HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/05/19 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~- Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
AGENDAS
[] Redevelopment Agency
[] Fire Protection District
[] City Council
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m.
MAY 19, 2004
AGENCY, BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro leto
Rex Gutierre:, ............................ Member
Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member
Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
.,.~RANcHO
~jUCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
!f you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Communications". There
~s opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the stafftable. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, cLrancho-cucamonga, ca. us
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
1
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
[~ANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
CUGAMONGA
A. CALLTO ORDER I
1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __,
Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__.
IIANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Rancho Cucamonga
High School Percussion Ensemble for receiving "Gold" at the 2004
Winter Guard International Championships.
2. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "Public Works Week,
May 16 -22, 2004."
3. Presentation of California Park and Recreation Society District XI
2004 Layman's Award to Northtown Housing Development and
Calvary Chapel Church of Rancho Cucamonga.
II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
II ,. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Il
This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the
City Council on matters not on the agenda.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: May 5, 2004
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 2
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
C~¢NCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE
UCJtMONGA
2. Approval of Warrants, Register April 28 through May 11, 2004, and
Payroll ending May 11, 2004, for the total amount of $5,696,169.76.
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 27
30, 2004.
4. Approval to adopt the resolution approving the Application for Land
and Water Conversation funds for a walking trail/open space project 28
at Central Park.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-154 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER
CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR A WALKING
TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT AT CENTRAL
PARK
5. Approval of Resolution authorizing the implementation of the 32
Provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 414(h)(2) and allowing
City employees to participate in the Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan
for the purpose of purchasing CaIPERS service credits.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-155 33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION
414(h)(2) AND ALLOWING CITY EMPLOYEES
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PRE-TAX PAYROLL
DEDUCTION PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PURCHASING CalPERS SERVICE CREDITS
6. Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2003/04 appropriations. 35
7. Approval of the Emergency Procurement of Reconstruction Services '100
without competitive bidding, pursuant to Resolution 04-150.
8. Approval for the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed to remove
grading and drainage easements granted to construct improvements 104
under Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01 for
property located east of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill and
south of Church.
9. Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105 - City of 106
Rancho Cucamonga - A request to designate six residences located
at 9424 Foothill, 9434 Foothill, 9456 Foothill, 9474 Foothill, 9482
Foothill, 9494 Foothill as an Historic Point of Interest and allow
relocation of demolition of all or some of the subject structures.
Related files: DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-
00105 and SUBTT16567 - APN: 208-141-08, -08, -09, -11, -13, -14.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 3
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
cRANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONG~.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-156 130
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2004-00105,
DESIGNATING SIX HOUSES BUILT BY THE
KLUSMANS, AS A HISTORIC POINT OF
INTEREST, LOCATED AT 9424, 9434, 9456,
9474, 9482, AND 9494 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-141-06, 08,
09, 11, 13, AND 14
10. Approval to appropriate from the 2003 United States Department of
Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) $33,000.00 to 132
Acct. No. 1368701-5603, for the Taser Inc. Less Than Lethal
Electronic Weapons System; $15,000.00 into Acct. No. 1368701-5604,
for two Suzuki Enduro motorcycles and related emergency
equipment; and $10,000.00 into Acct. No. 1368701-5603, for the Q-
Star Company Flash-Cam Anti-Graffiti Camera System, for a total
appropriation of $58,000.
11. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for 135
Development Review Project DRC2003-00302, located on the south
side of Arrow Route and west of Heilman Avenue, submitted by West
Rock, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-157 138
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT DRC2003-00302
12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, 139
Ordering the Annexation to landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map
No. 15716-2 located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Victoria Gardens, LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-158 141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 15716-2 AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 4
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANCHO HALL, 10500 C~v~c CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-159 142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP NUMBER
15716-2
13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 149
Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 8 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for
Tract Map 16542, located at 6717 East Avenue, north of Victoria
Street, submitted by J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-160 152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
16542, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
iMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-161 '153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16542
14. Approval for award and execution of Professional Services 161
Agreement in the amount of $205,000.00 to Dan Guerra and
Associates (CO 04-048), and authorize the expenditure of a 10%
contingency in the amount of $20,500.00 for Construction Survey
and Administration Services for Phases 3B(a) and 3B(b) of CFD
2003-01, to be funded from Fund 614 - CFD 2003-01, Acct. No.
16143035300/1442614-0.
15. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement by and among the Ontario 167
Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Jefferson on Fourth, L.P. (CO 04-049) regarding installation of 60"
storm drain and other related improvements with no City funds
involved for Parcel Map 16245, located nodh of 4th Street, west of
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Jefferson on Fourth, L.P.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 5
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
c~,NCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 04-162 170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE ONTARIO
REDEVELOISMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON
ON FOURTH, L.P. REGARDING
INSTALLATION OF 60" STORM DRAIN AND
OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO
CITY FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL MAP
16245
16. Approval to award designated Professional Services Agreements to
the specified Civil Engineering Consultants for the preparation of 171
plans, specifications and cost estimates for the emergency erosion
control projects necessary in the wake of the fire, and authorize the
expenditure of a 10% contingency for each agreement, to be funded
from Capital Reserve Acct. No. 10250015300 and authorize an
appropriation into Acct. No. 10250015300.
17. Approval to authorize the execution of an Agreement and accept 173
surety for encroachments into City easement or right-of-way between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Pomona First Federal Bank and
Trust (CO 04-050), at a location within Fifth Street, east of Milliken
Avenue.
18. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Best Best &
Kreiger, LLP, (CO 04-051 ) for Bond Counsel Services for a proposed 175
Community Facilities District (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) in an
amount not to exceed $25,000 for formation services and an amount
not to exceed $59,500 for debt issuance services, to be funded by
the project developer.
19. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with David Taussig &
Associates (CO 04-052) for Special Tax Consultant Services for a 177
proposed Community Facilities District (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) in
an amount not to exceed $40,000, to be funded by the project
developer.
20. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Empire 179
Economics (CO 04-053) for Market Absorption Services for a
proposed Community Facilities District (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) in
an amount not to exceed $15,750, to be funded by the project
developer.
21. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Fieldman,
Rolapp & Associates (CO 04-054) for Financial Advisory Services for
a proposed Community Facilities District (Rancho Etiwanda Estates)
in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for formation services and an
amount not to exceed $43,000 for debt issuance services, to be
funded by the project developer.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
6
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY
HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
22. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Bruce W. Hull & 183
Associates (CO 04-055) to perform Appraisal Services in conjunction
with a proposed Community Facilities District (Rancho Etiwanda
Estates) in an amount not to exceed $30,000, to be funded by the
project developer.
23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion 185
for Improvements for Parcel Map 16042, located at the southwest
corner of 8th Street and Center Avenue, submitted by Park Place
Rancho Cucamonga, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-163 '187
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO.
16042, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion 188
for Improvements for Tract 13316/DR 98-10, located on the east
side of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Street, submitted by Barratt
American, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-164 19'1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13316/DR 98-
10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
25. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14120-3, 192
located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of Etiwanda
Avenue, submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC.
26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 194
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion
for Improvements for Tract 14522, located on the south side of
Vintage Drive, West of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Young
California Homes, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-165 '196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14522 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 7
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
,,~R~,,CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
(~JCAMONGA
27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 202
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bend, and file a Notice of Completion
for Improvements for Tract 16147, located on the southwest corner
of Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Pacific Crest
Communities, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-166 204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16147 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
28. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion 205
for Improvements for Tract 14496, located north of Wilson Avenue
on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Granite
Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-167 207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA1
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14496 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
The followin§ Ordinanees have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to he routine and non-
oontroYersial. The Couneil will act upon them at one time without
discuesion. The City Clark will read the title. Any item eon be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 8
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY
RANCHO HALL, '10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. APPROVAL TO A RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND 208
COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND
10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED
RESOLUTION NO. 04-168 210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE
AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET 211
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND
8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED
RESOLUTION NO. 04-169 213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
3. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND 214
COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85)
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 9
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RESOLUTION NO. 04-170 216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND
RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.
PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL
COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES 217
- A request to change the zone from Community Commercial to
Mixed Use for a .7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill
Boulevard Districts, located north of Foothill Boulevard, between
Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-151-20 thru 23.
Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development
Review DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC200400139,
and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105. Staff has prepared a
Mitigated Negative Declaration' of environmental impacts for
consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 723 (first reading) 332
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MIXED-USE
FOR A.7 ACRE PORTION OF SUBAREA 3 OF
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS,
LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND
MALACHITE AVENUES - APN: 0208-151-20
THRU 23; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC 335
PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH
ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to
allow RV storage for the southwest parcel of 9.87 acres of land in
the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at
the southwest corner of the 210 and 1-15 freeway interchange -
APN: 0228-011-31. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-
00048. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 10
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
~:~NCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ORDINANCE NO. 724 (first reading) 405
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-
00047 TO ALLOW A CREATIONAL VEHICLE
STORAGE FACILITY ON 9.87 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 210 AND
1-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0228-011-31
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
III. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS II
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input,
1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE MEASURE 'T' 408
EXPENDITURE PLAN PREPARED BY SANBAG FOR MAJORITY
APPROVAL BY SANBAG'S MEMBERSHIP IN ORDER TO PLACE
THE MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 2004 BALLOT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-153 412
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE THE MEASURE
'T' EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR REVENUES
EXPECTED TO BE DERIVED FROM THE
PROPOSED CONTINUATION OF MEASURE
'T', SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'S ONE-HALF
OF ONE PERCENT TRANSACTIONS AND
USE TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 19, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 11
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
C[~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
II J. COUNCIL BUSINESS ]
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 414
UPDATE
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT
MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
II g. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
I, Oebra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on May 13, 2004, seventy two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
May 5, 2004
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, May 5, 2004, in the Tapia
Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The
meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; William P. Curley III,
Deputy City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; and George Rivera, Administrative
Services Manager.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item.
B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE
RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER; PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER;
AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE
MEET AND CONFER PROCESS - CITY
II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No communication was made on the closed session item.
[I D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
The closed session began at 5:35 p.m.
The closed session recessed at 6:48 p.m. with no action taken.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 5, 2004, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane
Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; William P. Curley III, Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
RDA Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director;
Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Mike Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner;
Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Peter Bryan, Fire Marshal Mike
Bell and Emergency Medical Services Coordinator Stephanie Rasmussen, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst
II; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
I} B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS [
81. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of"Business Appreciation Week, May 10-14, 2004."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Chamber of Commerce representatives Rosemary
Faust, Chairman of the Board, and Norm McKenzie, PresidentJCEO.
B2. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Costco Wholesale for receiving the Inland Valley
Economic Development Corporation BRACE Award for "Retail Business of the Year (2003-2004);" and
Vineyard Bank for receiving the Inland Valley Economic Development Corporation BRACE Award for
"Service Business of the Year (2003-2004)."
Mayor Alexander presented the Certificates of Recognition to Brian McCutcheon, General Manager of
COSTCO, Joe Schumacher, Manager of COSTCO, and Ron Sakala, Sr. Vice President of Vineyard
National Bank.
B3. Presentation of a Proclamation to West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District in recognition of
"Mosquito and Vector Control and West Nile Virus Awareness Week, May 3 - 9, 2004."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation of Dr. Min-Lee Cheng, District Manager of West Valley
Mosquito and Vector Control District.
B4. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of"Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week, May 16
- 22, 2004."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation of Stephanie Rasmussen, EMS Coordinator.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 3
B5. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "Wildfire Awareness Week, May 9 - 15, 2004."
Chief Peter Bryan made some introductory comments about Wildfire Awareness Week and the
importance of the Fire Safe Council.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to the Fire Safe Council members that were present.
B6. ADDED ITEM - Presentation of a Community Television Video from Charter Communications
entitled: "After the Firestorm: A Documentary on the Grand Prix and Old Fires."
Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, introduced Ruth Leal from Charter Communications.
Ruth Leal, Charter Communications, gave an introduction and presented the video.
B7. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is an item staff is requesting to be added which would
designate a voting representative and an alternate for the League of Cities General Assembly
Meeting to be held May 13, 2004. (ITEM LISTED UNDER COUNCIL BUSINESS)
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to add the item. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda, saluted the Fire Department in fighting the Grand Prix Fire. He wished
everyone a happy Cinco de Mayo. He felt people should always think about bike safety and obey traffic
laws.
C2. Hilda Phillips, Terra Vista, stated it was good to have the students at the Council meeting so they
can learn. She commented about the groundbreaking of Central Park on Milliken and presented pictures
of this event to the Council.
C3. Leslie Grimes, Alta Loma, reminded everybody this is an election year and encouraged students and
all residents of the City to register to vote. She mentioned the annexation items on tonight's agenda and
reminded the Council that some of them ran on the platform of open space and hoped they would stick to
their word. She asked that the Council keep open space in the City.
C4. Melanie Ingram, Rosebud, stated when the recall effort ended, their committee promised to keep
people informed as to what was going on. She stated they came before the Council in January and told
about Dr. Kurth stating he was "running for re-election" when he is running for office for the first time in
November 2004. She continued to talk about the process the Council went through to appoint
Councilmembers Kurth and Howdyshell and felt it was not handled legally. She asked people not to vote
for them in November 2004. She stated she will keep a watch on how the campaigns are going. She
wanted to tell people out in the community to come forward and tell the Council what they are thinking.
She stated she will keep these issues in the forefront until November.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 4
I] D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS [
D1. Councilmember Kudh stated he had been to Washington, D.C. with some doctors to meet with
legislators regarding drug addiction program funding. He stated last week he was in Sacramento to meet
with legislators regarding providing medical treatment for all people. He also mentioned that on Saturday
he went to a Cinco de Mayo celebration at one of the City's parks.
D2. Councilmember Williams mentioned the City's volunteer recognition program and how important the
volunteers are to the community. She felt this was her opportunity to speak out when an untruth is said
and felt it was her obligation and responsibility to correct it or give her side of a story. She stated it was
earlier stated that she did not want a special election, which was not correct because she did vote for
that, but it was voted down. She stated that left the Council with appointing someone to fill the vacancies.
She stated there was no Brown Act violation and that she has been on the Council too long to make such
a foolish move. She stated it is her responsibility to set the record straight. She stated this Saturday is
the Rotary Club Track Meet at Chaffey College with about 600 kids participating.
D3. Councilmember Gutierrez thanked all of the volunteers that help the City. He congratulated all
students that were present tonight and especially the seniors. He congratulated the Class of 2004 and
was glad they had a good.prom.
D4. Mayor Alexander mentioned the Etiwanda High School Music Program's Silent Auction to be held
May 8 in the Etiwanda High School gym. He also mentioned there was a mariachi band playing at
Chaffey College today and how wonderful they were.
I] E. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item E32 has a revised Resolution that has been placed before the
Council.
El. Approval of Warrants, Register April 13 through April 27, 2004, and Payroll ending April 27, 2004, for
the total amount of $3,553,510.65.
E2. Approval of a Public Convenience and Necessity - DRC 2004-00225 - Beverages & More - a
request to consider the issuance of a Public Convenience and Necessity for a specialty retailer of beer,
wine, spirits, gourmet food, and related items in a leased space of 10,000 square feet within the Victoria
Gateway shopping center in the Mixed use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located at the
northwest corner of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards - APN: 0227-201-38, 39 and 44.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-130
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2004-00225 FOR A
SPECIALTY RETAILER (BEVERAGES & MORE) OF BEER, WINE,
SPIRITS, GOURMET FOOD, AND RELATED ITEMS, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK AND FOOTHILL
BOULEVARDS; AND MAKING FENDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0227-201-38, 39, AND 44
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 5
E3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the ADA 2003/2004 Access
Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards
generally located along Base Line Road, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 12143035650/1017214-0,
12143035650/1150214-0, and 11763035650/1150176-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ADA 2003/2004 ACCESS RAMP AND
DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
E4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Carnelian Street Landscape
Improvements from Vivero Street to 1000' south of Vivero Street, to be funded from Acct. No.
11103165650/1172110-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE CARNELIAN STREET LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS FROM VIVERO STREET TO 1000' SOUTH OF
VIVERO STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of 2004~2005
Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Acct. No.
11703035650/1022170 (Gas Tax).
RESOLUTION NO. 04-133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF 2004~2005 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID
CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of the 6th Street
Storm Drain, Railroad Crossing Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to
380' west of Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No. 11243035650/1081124 (Transportation).
RESOLUTION NO. 04-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6TM STREET
STORM DRAIN, RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO 380'
WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E7. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of a Bus Bay
located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No.
11053035650/1238105-0 (AB2766 Air Quality Improvement Fund).
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 04-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS BAY ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE,
IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
E8. Approval of City Co*Sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Star Game at the Rancho
Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on June 3rd (practice game) and June 8, 2004 (game date).
E9. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2001-00589, located on the west side of Maple Place,
approximately 750 feet north of Arrow Route, submitted by Wayne S. Carey and Debra J. Carey.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-136
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00589
El0. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00006, located on the south side of Ninth Street,
approximately 250 feet east of Helms Avenue, submitted by David R. Moore and Gall Moore.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-137
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3B
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
FOR DRC2002-00006
Ell. Approval to vacate Center Avenue, located north of Trademark Parkway, and setting the date of
Public Hearing for June 2, 2004.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-138
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
VACATE CENTER AVENUE LOCATED NORTH OF TRADEMARK
PARKVVAY, APPROXIMATELY 66 FEET WIDE AND 243 FEET LONG
E12. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for DRC2003-00319, located at
the cul-de-sac terminus of Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue and south of Almond Street,
submitted by ERH22, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2003-00319
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 7
E13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Storm Drain
Improvement for Parcel Map 16167, located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9TM Street,
submitted by ON Vineyard, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-140
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16167
E14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Drainage Acceptance
Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map 16512, located at the northeast corner of Milliken
Avenue and Church Street, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16512,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
4 FOR TRACT MAP 16512
E15. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $1,388,377.70 to the lowest responsible bidder, Sequel Contractors, Inc. (CO 04-041), and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $138,837.77 for Phases lB(B), 3B(A),
and 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 and 2003-01 funds, Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0 ($294,342.35) and
16143035650/1442614-0 ($1,232,873.13) and appropriate $294,342.35 (Fund 612 share of contract
award of $267,583.95 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $26,758.40) to Acct. No.
16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 Fund balance.
E16. Approval of a Reimbursement A~lreement (CO 04-042) for Installation of Portions of Master Plan
Storm Drain Line 3-E in connection with development of Tract 13930, located on Wilson Avenue from
Amethyst Street to Alta Loma Channel, submitted by Hix Homes, DRA-28.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT DRA-28 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PORTIONS OF
MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN LINE 3-E, LOCATED IN WILSON
AVENUE FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ALTA LOMA CHANNEL
E17. Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement SRA-31 (CO 04-043) for Median Landscaping on Wilson
Avenue, between Etiwanda Avenue and Cervantes Place, in conjunction with the development of Tracts
14380 and 13527, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue west of I::tiwanda Avenue, submitted by
Mastercraft Homes, to be funded from Trust Acct. No. 1882-000-2324.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 8
RESOLUTION NO. 04-144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR MEDIAN LANDSCAPING ON WILSON AVENUE,
BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CERVANTES PLACE, SRA-31
E18. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR00-60, located on the east side of
Amethyst Street between La Grande Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Northtown Housing
Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR00-60 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2001-00345, located at 7576 Etiwanda
Avenue, submitted by The Gardens, LLC.
E20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Cash Deposit) for DRC2001-00493, located on
the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Fifth Street, submitted by Lindsay-Ontario, LLC.
E21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond (Cash Deposit), accept a
Maintenance Bond (cash deposit), and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRCDR00-17,
located on the north side of Arrow Route, west of Day Creek Channel, submitted by Southern California
Edison and Secured Equities Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRCDR00-17 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14208, located on the north side of
Base Line Road and west of Alta Cuesta Drive, submitted by Ralph G. Rittenhouse.
E23. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond and Guarantee of Performance Bonds for Tract
15727-6, located at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel,
bordered by Sixth Street, submitted by Centerpointe 257, LLC.
E24. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond and Guarantee of Performance Bond for Tract
15727-8, located at the intersection of Fourth Street and the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel,
bordered by Sixth Street, submitted by Centerpointe 257, LLC.
E25. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 15866, located on the southeast
corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive, submitted by APHRC24, LLC.
E26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of
Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 15732, located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue
and Dorset Street, submitted by W.F. Construction, Inc.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 04-147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15732 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E27. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tract 15871-1, located on the northeast
corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc.
E28. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds and Guarantee of Performance (Cash Deposit)
for Tract 15871-2, located on the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park lane,
submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc.
E29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16026, located on the west side of
Amethyst Street, north of Valley View Street, submitted by Amethyst Estates, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-148
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16026 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E30. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16128, located on the northwest corner
of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court, submitted by D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company.
E31. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as the Maintenance Bond,
and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16302, located on the northeast corner of
Smokestone Street and Mulberry Street, submitted by APHRC23, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-149
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16302 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E32. Approval of a Resolution ratifying and authorizing the emergency procurement of professional
services (Clayton Group Services (CO 04-044) and Belfor USA Group (CO 04-045) without competitive
bidding in response to the City Hall fire. (SEE REVISED RESOLUTION)
RESOLUTION NO. 04-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.08 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports as contained in the Consent Calendar with the corrected Resolution for item E32. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 10
I] [
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2001-00534 - CABOT
iNDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P. - Request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Park
Development District, Subarea 6, to eliminate Center Ave. from 6th St. south to Trademark Parkway,
submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties - APN's 209-072-06 -11, -16, -17 and -35.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 722.
ORDINANCE NO. 722 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534, TO AMEND THE STREET
CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF CENTER
AVENUE FROM 6TM STREET SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY BY
AMENDING SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURE 17.30.080-H OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 722.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
[] G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HE),RINGS I
Gl. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDIN~
ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 - A review of the federally required Annual Action Plan,
which includes the final selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,180,000.
Staff report and video were presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner.
Councilmember Kurth stated he felt the list was excellent and did not have any changes.
Councilmember Williams thanked Tom Grahn again for the great job he does with this program.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing.. Addressing the City Council was:
Dianna Lee Mitchell, YMCA, thanked the Council for their support, and especially for the senior
transportation program. She also stated the teen center is possible because of the City Council.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to adopt the Annual Action Plan so it can be
forwarded to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for their consideration. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 11
II .. ", AR,NCS I
No items Submitted.
II I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS ]
I1. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX (DRC2003-01164) - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Approximately 300 acres of land generally located north of Wilson Avenue
between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-05, 06, 07, 08, and 09; and 0226-
081-05, 06, 07, 08, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2003-
01162, and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-01163.
Staff report and power point presentation were given by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, which is on
file in the City Clerk's office.
Councilmember Kurth inquired how much of this will be open space.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated a majority of it will be in the conservation area.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked why would the City want to annex more land into the City, why would the
County be willing to do this, and what would happen to it if it were not annexed?
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated the County has recently changed their philosophy on
development in the unincorporated areas. They feel as a subregional agency development is not
something they should spend time on. They feel it is better left in the hands of local jurisdictions who are
providing most of the infrastructure anyway. He stated most of the land that has been annexed both in
the past and for the future is zoned by the County at three units per acre. He stated ail of these projects
are coming within the average County range. He stated if we don't annex the land, the property owner
involved has the right to apply and be granted approval by the County for those densities.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if this isn't annexed would it be developed under the County.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yes.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated if this is adjoining our City and really looks like it is part of our City, would
we prefer it is annexed.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated yes.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the North Etiwanda Preserve.
Larry Henderson, stated it is north of this area and administered by a County Board. He stated they are
looking to fence the area and prevent dumping.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked how much open space will there be in 10 years.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated the majority of it will be open space or conservation areas.
Councilmember Kurth felt it is important to preserve as much open space as possible. He pointed out
development is going to occur whether the City owns it or not, but felt if the City has it, we can control
what is being developed.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 12
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-151
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO PURSUE A
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (APPROXIMATELY 300
ACRES - DRC2003-01164) GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
WILSON AVENUE BETVVEEN EAST AVENUE AND WARDMAN
BULLOCK ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBITS "A" AND "B,"
A'F~-ACHED AND AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "C," THE ATTACHED
PLAN FOR SERVICES
Councilmember Williams pointed out this is the beginning of a process to annex this property.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to approve Resolution No. 04-151. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
12. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF iNTENTION TO ANNEX (DRC2003-00753)
Approximately 100 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located within the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0225-084-04, 0226-081-09 and 10,
and 0226-082-28 and 29. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-1-16324, General Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00750, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00751.
SEE DISCUSSION OF ITEM I1 FOR THIS ITEM.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO PURSUE A
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (APPROXIMATELY 100
ACRES - DRC2003-00753) GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION WITH COLONBERO ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" AND "B" ATTACHED AND AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "C,"
THE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SERVICES
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to approve Resolution No. 04-152. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 13
J. COUNCIL BUSINESS
J1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral Report)
Councilmember Williams thanked the citizens for signing the petitions to protect City revenues. She
stated there are approximately 1.1 million signatures, so it can go before the voters on the ballot. She
stated she is waiting to see how Sacramento will be making cuts in their operations. She stated on April
15, when the petitions were submitted, there was information from the legislature with a proposal to only
take money from the cities for two years. She fett the Governor is now listening to what cities have to say.
She stated she testified at a Senate Committee last week against a bill that will hurt cities. She stated
next week she and City Manager Jack Lam will be going to Sacramento for Legislative Days and for the
Special General Assembly meeting.
Councilmember Kurth stated the real kudos go to Diane Williams for leading the charge to collect the
signatures.
J2. ADDED ITEM - DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND A ALTERNATE FOR THE
LEAGUE OF CITIES GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager, who stated it is suggested the Council select Diane
Williams since she will be attending the General Assembly meeting to be held May 13, 2004.
MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to select Diane Williams. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
II K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING I
No items were identified for the next meeting.
II L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
May 5, 2004
Page 14
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209470 4/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 229.91
AP - 00209470 4/28/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 58.24
AP - 00209471 4/28/2004 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00209472 4/28/2004 ADAMS, RENE 39.00
AP - 00209474 4/28/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,155.00
AP - 00209477 4/28/2004 ALAM, KANDAKAR 140.00
AP - 00209478 4/28/2004 ALIGAEN, IRMINA 65.00
AP - 00209480 4/28/2004 ALLISON, BILL 47.00
AP - 0020948 t 4/28/2004 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 175.00
AP - 00209482 4/28/2004 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 53.92
AP - 00209483 4/28/2004 AMERICAN RED CROSS 120.00
AP - 00209485 4/28/2004 AQUAMAR 118.40
AP - 00209486 4/28/2004 ARMANI, MONICA 200.00
AP - 00209487 4/28/2004 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 600.00
AP - 00209487 4/28/2004 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 399.00
AP - 00209487 4/28/2004 ARNOLD IqELDS PAINTING 300.00
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 35.79
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 31.51
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 38.09
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 158.86
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 5,338.00
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 15.00
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 127.25
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 371.08
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 19.92
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 21.54
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 209.90
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 48.55
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 110.43
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 294.91
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 380.63
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 78.66
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 146.06
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 341.16
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 69.16
AP ~ 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 29.83
AP ~ 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 385.57
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 354.69
AP - 00209488 4/28/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 8.92
AP - 00209489 4/28/2004 AURORA PICTURES INC. 404.00
AP - 00209490 4/28/2004 AYRES SUITES 1,186.66
AP - 00209491 4/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 673.44
AP 00209491 4/28/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 90.09
AP 00209493 4/28/2004 BARNES AND NOBLE 47.32
AP 00209494 4/28/2004 BARROW, KELLY 56.50
AP 00209497 4/28/2004 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND 400.00
AP 00209498 4/28/2004 BLUM, DOLLY 47.00
AP 00209499 4/28/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED 30.00
AP 00209500 4/28/2004 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORE 1,262.83
AP 00209501 4/28/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 6.47
AP- 00209501 4/28/2004 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 6.47
AP - 00209502 4/28/2004 BORJA, JANELLE 40.00
.... AP--_0_020950_~ ._ 4/28/2004 c~W~pRIv~ CO~Rb_CTgRS ............... 2_0,452.00 ....
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
./
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209505 4/28/2004 C.W. DRIVER CONTRACTORS 20,452.00
AP - 00209506 4/28/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK INC. 8,960.00
AP - 00209507 4/28/2004 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 72,808.16
AP - 00209508 4/28/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 3,193.98
AP - 00209509 4/28/2004 CAMPBELL, VASHTI 77.00
AP - 00209510 4/28/2004 CARBERRY, WAYNE 115.00
AP - 00209512 4/28/2004 CERRILLO, ROBERT 7.50
AP - 00209513 4/28/2004 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 420.00
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 125.32
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 31.33
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 31.33
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 187.98
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,002.53
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 877.22
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 250.63
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 219.31
AP - 00209514 4/28/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 407.28
AP - 00209515 4/28/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 12,960.00
AP - 00209515 4/28/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,360.00
AP - 00209516 4/28/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00209517 4/28/2004 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 186.95
AP - 00209519 4/28/2004 COASTAL PUBLISHING 199.00
AP - 00209520 4/28/2004 COLLINS, SONIA 34.00
AP - 00209522 4/28/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 118.50
AP - 00209522 4/28/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 167.10
AP - 00209523 4/28/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 188.56
AP - 00209526 4/28/2004 CRAIG, LAIRD 65.00
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.94
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 245.21
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.40
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 393.81
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 329.57
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.85
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.27
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.16
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.70
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 341.94
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 453.75
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.70
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.27
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.45
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.25
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.08
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.09
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.57
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.50
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.37
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.38
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 87.69
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.58
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.83
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.28
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 188.74
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.70
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 2 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.45
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 78.29
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 754.46
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 600.26
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 592.50
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 519.28
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 711.20
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 362.86
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 559.21
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 410.55
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 269.61
AP - 00209528 4/28/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 480.31
AP - 00209530 4/28/2004 D'AMBRA, MARIA 200.00
AP - 00209531 4/28/2004 DANIEL, LEANN 65.00
AP - 00209532 4/28/2004 DAVENPORT, JAY E. 513.50
AP - 00209534 4/28/2004 DAZALLA, MICHELLE 100.00
AP - 00209535 4/28/2004 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP - 00209536 4/28/2004 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 75.30
AP - 00209537 4/28/2004 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 64.00
AP - 00209538 4/28/2004 DIRECTV 30.08
AP - 00209539 4/28/2004 DOLLAR TREE STORES #2445 202.64
AP 00209540 4/28/2004 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC 100,276.00
AP 00209540 4/28/2004 DOUBLE D PIPELINE INC -9,116.00
AP 00209541 4/28/2004 DRAPER, KIMBERLY 60.00
AP 00209542 4/28/2004 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,278.99
AP 00209545 4/28/2004 ESPINO'S COP SHOP 1NC 476.79
AP 00209545 4/28/2004 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 242.33
AP - 00209546 4/28/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 75.00
AP - 00209547 4/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 235.72
AP - 00209547 4/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 827.00
AP - 00209547 4/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 53.10
AP - 00209547 4/28/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 209.63
AP - 00209548 4/28/2004 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 400.00
AP - 00209549 4/28/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.78
AP - 00209550 4/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 821.06
AP - 00209550 4/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00
AP - 00209550 4/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00
AP - 00209550 4/28/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00
AP - 00209551 4/28/2004 FLETCHER, RICHARD 348.25
AP - 00209552 4/28/2004 FLORES, ELODIA 65.00
AP - 00209554 4/28/2004 FREMONT, WILHELMINA 15.00
AP - 00209555 4/28/2004 GALE GROUP,THE 13.53
AP - 00209556 4/28/2004 GARCIA, CHRISTINE 34.00
AP - 00209557 4/28/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 33.00
AP - 00209557 4/28/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 28.13
AP - 00209557 4/28/2004 GARCIA, VIVIAN 12.00
AP - 00209559 4/28/2004 GEIGER, VERNON 65.00
AP - 00209560 4/28/2004 GLESEKE, CHRIS 14.00
AP - 00209561 4/28/2004 GONZALES, CARLOS 60.00
AP - 00209562 4/28/2004 GONZALEZ, PATRICIA 30.00
AP - 00209563 4/28/2004 GREGORY, CHERI 57.00
AP - 00209564 4/28/2004 GUARDIAN 2,753.98
AP - 00209565 4/28/2004 HERRING, ANDREA 32.00
AP - 00209566 4/28/2004 HOLIDAY INN SACRAMENTO NORTHEAST 95.33
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No.. Check Date Vendor Name. Amount
AP - 00209567 4/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,047.87
AP - 00209567 4/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 33.09
AP - 00209567 4/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 357.86
AP - 00209567 4/28/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00209569 4/28/2004 HP EXPRESS SERVICES 1,899.00
AP - 00209570 4/28/2004 HUANG, PRUDENCE 1,425.00
AP - 00209571 4/28/2004 HUBER, PAULA 32.00
AP - 00209572 4/28/2004 HUSSAIN, OMAR 200.00
AP - 00209573 4/28/2004 HUSSAIN, ROSE 60.00
AP - 00209574 4/28/2004 IBM CORPORATION 13,373.50
AP - 00209575 4/28/2004 IBM CORPORATION 417.38
AP - 00209575 4/28/2004 IBM CORPORATION 1,104.43
AP - 00209576 4/28/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.80
AP - 00209578 4/28/2004 IZQUIERDO, KARLA 48.00
AP - 00209579 4/28/2004 JANUARY, DONISHA 100.00
AP - 00209580 4/28/2004 JOBS AVAILABLE 82.80
AP - 00209581 4/28/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 412.50
AP - 00209581 4/28/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 335.40
AP - 00209582 4/28/2004 JONES, BOB 2,560.00
AP - 00209583 4/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN iNC 54,200.52
AP - 00209583 4/28/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 1,822.16
AP - 00209585 4/28/2004 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,566.00
AP - 00209587 4/28/2004 LEE, JUDY 56.50
AP - 00209588 4/28/2004 LEIIq~'ER, LUKAS 216.00
AP ~ 00209589 4/28/2004 LEONARDO, DEBBY 200.00
AP - 00209590 4/28/2004 LEWIS INVESTMENTS 3,227.00
AP - 00209592 4/28/2004 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,984.00
AP - 00209593 4/28/2004 LIL STITCH 280.15
AP - 00209595 4/28/2004 LOPEZ, GRACIELA 200.00
AP - 00209596 4/28/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00
AP - 00209597 4/28/2004 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 311.59
AP - 00209598 4/28/2004 LOYOLA, LISA 70.00
AP - 00209600 4/28/2004 MADD-SAN BERNARDINO 250.00
AP - 00209601 4/28/2004 MAGIC AND VARIETY ENTERTAINMENT 250.00
AP - 00209602 4/28/2004 MAIN STREET SIGNS 40.41
AP - 00209603 4/28/2004 MARECEK, JOSEPH FRANK 1,508.40
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 328.82
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 497.46
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,718.70
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICLrLTURAL ENT INC 1,631.13
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,559.06
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,245.99
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 737.24
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,282.99
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,845.19
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,280.00
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,605.17
AP - 00209604 4/28/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,191.52
AP - 00209605 4/28/2004 MATRIX INSTIUTE-IE 1,350.00
AP - 00209606 4/28/2004 MATTHIS, KRISTIN 50.00
AP-00209608 4/28/2004 MCI 647.10
AP - 00209609 4/28/201M MEDRANO, DANIELA 200.00
AP - 00209610 4/28/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 72.25
AP :0_0209_610 4/28/2004 MICROAGE ~OMPUTERMART 427.85
User: AHAWORTH- Ann Haworth Page: 4 Curr'~nt Date: 05/1~/2~C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount.
AP - 00209610 4/28/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERIVIART 626.95
AP - 00209611 4/28/2004 MISSION HILLS MORTGAGE 170.96
AP - 00209612 4/28/2004 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46
AP - 00209612 4/28/2004 MOBILE MINI INC -84.80
AP - 00209612 4/28/2004 MOBILE MINI INC -84.05
AP - 00209612 4/28/2004 MOBILE MINI INC 130.38
AP 00209613 4/28/2004 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 3,903.59
AP 00209615 4/28/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 12,755.15
AP 00209616 4/28/2004 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOC 70.00
AP 00209617 4/28/2004 NAVARRO, ISABEL 58.85
AP 00209618 4/28/2004 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 525.00
AP 00209619 4/28/2004 NEWFER, GENA 100.00
AP - 00209620 4/28/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00209620 4/28/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00209620 4/28/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00209621 4/28/2004 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 130.00
AP - 00209622 4/28/2004 O'BRIEN, LISA 30.00
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 19.57
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.81
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 27.58
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 9.50
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 69.94
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 24.14
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 91.82
AP ~ 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 24.67
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -666.13
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 789.44
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 33.98
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 10.35
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 13.37
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.02
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 9.98
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 22.67
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 2.44
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 4.70
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 6.97
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 35.44
AP- 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 315.08
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 46.93
AP - 00209623 4/28/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 2.45
AP - 00209624 4/28/2004 OMNITRANS 405.50
AP - 00209625 4/28/2004 PADEN, MICHAEL 48.00
AP - 00209626 4/28/2004 PANATTONI CONSTRUCTION 2,611.97
AP - 00209627 4/28/2004 PARR, JACKIE 152.00
AP - 00209628 4/28/2004 PARSAC 2,972.00
AP - 00209628 4/28/2004 PARSAC 166.50
AP - 00209629 4/28/2004 PARSONS, ANGELA 39.00
AP - 00209630 4/28/2004 PEREZ, H~CTOR 50.00
AP - 00209631 4/28/2004 PERLA, HEATHER 55.00
AP - 00209632 4/28/2004 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 40.00
AP - 00209633 4/28/2004 PRASLIN, JAIME 200.00
AP - 00209634 4/28/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81
AP - 00209636 4/28/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 13,575.94
AP - 00209637 4/28/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,642.20
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 05/12/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name. Amount
AP - 00209638 4/28/2004 QWEST 3.55
AP - 00209639 4/28/2004 RANCHO AMIGOS INVESTORS LLC 15.00
AP - 00209640 4/28/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00
AP - 00209642 4/28/2004 RCPFA 6,245.46
AP - 00209643 4/28/2004 REDINGER, TOM 65.00
AP - 00209644 4/28/2004 REED, KATRINA 48.20
AP - 00209645 4/28/2004 REYES, MIGUEL 90.00
AP - 00209646 4/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,016.71
AP - 00209646 4/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,030.50
AP - 00209646 4/28/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 4,872.48
AP - 00209647 4/28/2004 RIKER, ANACRISTINA 100.00
AP - 00209648 4/28/2004 RIVAS, MIGUEL 90.00
AP - 00209650 4/28/2004 RMA GROUP 3,460.25
AP - 00209651 4/28/2004 ROJAS, CARLOS 11.25
AP- 00209651 4/28/2004 ROJAS, CARLOS 12.71
AP - 00209652 4/28/2004 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 3,082.84
AP - 00209653 4/28/2004 SALAMA, MIRA 200.00
AP - 00209654 4/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 25,667.60
AP - 00209654 4/28/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 25,667.60
AP - 00209655 4/28/2004 SAN BERNARDI~O COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT/R~ 3,816.93
AP - 00209656 4/28/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 437.44
AP - 00209657 4/28/2004 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY COLLEGE 1,000.00
AP - 00209658 4/28/2004 SARRATT, JENNIFER 65.00
AP - 00209660 4/28/2004 SBC 4,854.89
AP - 00209661 4/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 210.00
AP - 00209661 4/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 49.00
AP - 00209661 4/28/2004 SENCHAL, CAL 74.00
AP - 00209663 4/28/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 275.14
AP - 00209664 4/28/2004 SILVER, EDNA 390.00
AP - 00209665 4/28/2004 S1MPLOT PARTNERS 992.59
AP - 00209665 4/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,800.00
AP - 00209665 4/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 4,357.05
AP - 00209665 4/28/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,700.00
AP - 00209666 4/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 823.51
AP - 00209666 4/28/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1 i8.46
AP - 00209667 4/28/2004 SORIANO, HELEN 200.00
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,841.39
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.94
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.11
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.85
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.03
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.27
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.14
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.68
..... Ap - ~)02096_74~ 4~/28~/200_4_. _S OUT _H~__P,N~ CALIFOR_ NIA_E_DIS_O N 12.57
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 05/12/2012
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.64
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.88
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.50
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.14
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.60
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.07
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 429.46
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.88
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.72
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.95
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.19
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.07
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.74
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.03
AP 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.45
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.50
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.64
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.23
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.84
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.24
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.48
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,947.77
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.87
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.52
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.85
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON i2.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.35
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.32
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.08
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.40
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.79
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.00
__ _ AP~- 00209_674_ ~4/28/~2994__ SOU_T_~HERN._CALIFO~RNI_A_EDI~_O_N 12.47
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.77
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.89
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.87
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.80
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.40
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.61
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 408.10
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.69
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.56
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.02
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.87
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.18
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.39
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.14
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.58
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.00
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.08
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.78
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.75
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.19
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 732.70
AP q 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.79
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.06
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.74
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.35
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.17
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.60
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.56
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.34
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP ~ 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.72
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.80
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.33
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.13
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.60
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I3.25
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.83
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.46
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.29
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.68
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I3.33
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.10
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.89
AP - 00209674 412812004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.79
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.62
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.82
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.81
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.12
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.39
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.03
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.34
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.97
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.42
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.65
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.56
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.41
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.14
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.60
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.13
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.19
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON i6.38
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.39
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP- 00209674 4/28/200~; SOUT_HE_R_N C~ALIFORNIA EDISON
...................... 12.90
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 9 Current Date: 05/1-2/-2~C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.66
AP ~ 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.79
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.71
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.32
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.77
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.17
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.83
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.65
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.74
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.57
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.45
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.67
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.73
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.14
AP - 00209674 4/28/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.46
AP - 00209677 4/28/2004 STALEY, GARETT 55.00
AP - 00209678 4/28/2004 STEELE, ROBERT 94.00
AP - 00209679 4/28/2004 STERLING COI~I~EE SERVICE 398.59
AP - 00209680 4/28/2004 STETKEVICH, OREST 40.00
AP - 00209682 4/28/2004 SURFCONTROL [NC 6,648.75
AP - 00209682 4/28/2004 SURFCONTROL INC 108.00
AP - 00209683 4/28/2004 SWAN-PRUNG, JUNE 50.00
AP - 00209684 4/28/2004 SWRCB FEES 2,560.00
AP - 00209685 4/28/2004 TAHRAMANIS, DENISE 59.13
AP - 00209686 4/28/2004 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1.19
AP - 00209686 4/28/2004 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 949.68
AP - 00209686 4/28/2004 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 674.46
AP - 00209687 4/28/2004 TARGET 61.70
AP - 00209687 4/28/2004 TARGET 75.69
AP - 00209690 4/28/2004 THAMS, JULIE 80.00
AP - 00209691 4/28/2004 THOITS, STACY 64.00
AP - 00209692 4/28/2004 TIMES COMMUNITY NEWS 504.00
AP - 00209693 4/28/2004 TOVAL[N, DOLORES 98.00
AP - 00209694 4/28/2004 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS [NC 253.55
AP - 00209694 4/28/2004 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,465.59
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 806.58
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 3,238.18
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 62.57
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,941.23
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,238.33
AP - 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,415.77
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 05/12/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 581.00
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 681.60
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 13,882.38
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 48.72
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 60,284.08
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREENLANDCARE 315.03
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 489.29
AP 00209695 4/28/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,119.75
AP - 00209696 4/28/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,426.50
AP - 00209698 4/28/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR Pr 2,611.95
AP - 00209698 4/28/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 22,201.56
AP - 00209699 4/28/2004 UNIQUE CREATIONS 35.10
AP - 00209699 4/28/2004 UNIQUE CREATIONS 228.97
AP - 00209700 4/28/2004 UNITED WAY 49.00
AP - 00209702 4/28/2004 US HOMES INLAND DIVISION 900.00
AP - 00209703 4/28/2004 VALTIER, ANTHONY 60.00
AP - 00209705 4/28/2004 VEND U COMPANY 114.35
AP - 00209706 4/28/2004 VERDUSCO, LETICIA 95.00
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 85.87
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 464.25
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.45
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 1,234.35
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 43.69
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 77.46
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.88
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 27.91
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 86.65
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 166.58
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 43.02
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 50.60
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 60.52
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 115.93
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.65
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.41
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 89.73
AP-00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.16
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.61
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 31.23
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.48
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 27.74
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.16
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.18
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.18
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 172.96
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.88
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 494.95
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 113.39
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 11 Current ~)ate: -0-5~12/20~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC _ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
//
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 38.93
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 38.93
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 89.73
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.16
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.19
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 89.73
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.18
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 136.84
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 30.23
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.82
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 56.70
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.50
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.71
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 24.01
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 20.41
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 28.88
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 33.29
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 27.91
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.18
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.16
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 91.18
AP 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 83.13
AP - 00209708 4/28/2004 VERIZON 89.73
AP - 00209709 4/28/2004 VILLEGAS, MANUEL 90.00
AP - 00209710 4/28/2004 VISTA PAINT 115.72
AP - 00209710 4/28/2004 VISTA PAINT 57.86
AP - 00209711 4/28/2004 VIZICAST MULTIMEDIA INC 3,689.13
AP - 00209712 4/28/2004 WALIYAR, ABDUL HAKIM 70.00
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 158.05
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 29.48
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 394.15
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 441.37
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 666.16
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 558.43
AP - 00209713 4/28/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 690.95
AP - 00209714 4/28/2004 WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION 8.00
AP- 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 153.12
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 233.97
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 207.24
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 122.76
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 99.44
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 130.90
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 69.08
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 129.36
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 97.46
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 99.00
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 69.30
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 231.00
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 193.05
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 149.82
.... AP - 00_2__09~716 __ .4/28/2004.. WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 112.86
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 05/12/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
/2.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY IVlRF LLC 369.93
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 205.59
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 226.05
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 231.99
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 242.22
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 302.28
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 182.16
AP - 00209716 4/28/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 216.15
AP - 00209717 4/28/2004 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN AND SMART 5,490.23
AP - 00209718 4/28/2004 WYNN, LAURI 48.00
AP - 00209719 4/28/2004 YAHOO CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 38.00
AP - 00209720 4/28/2004 YEE, LARRY 75.00
AP - 00209721 4/28/2004 YOUNG, MISTY 300.00
AP - 00209722 4/28/2004 ZEIGLER, LARRY 500.00
AP - 00209722 4/28/2004 ZEIGLER, LARRY 55.00
AP - 00209723 4/28/2004 ALL CITIES TOOLS 463.00
AP - 00209723 4/28/2004 ALL CITIES TOOLS 964.33
AP - 00209723 4/28/2004 ALL CITIES TOOLS 465.51
AP - 00209731 4/29/2004 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC 125.00
AP - 00209732 4/29/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT 212,422.23
AP - 00209732 4/29/2004 DAVIES INC, ALBERT -32,648.49
AP - 00209734 5/3/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 20,547.50
AP - 00209735 5/3/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 18,647.50
AP - 00209736 5/3/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 24,715.00
AP - 00209737 5/5/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 17.00
AP - 00209737 5/5/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 16.63
AP - 00209737 5/5/2004 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 5.48
AP - 00209738 5/5/2004 AA EQUIFMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 27.95
AP - 00209738 5/5/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 1,445.38
AP - 00209738 5/5/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 71.43
AP - 00209739 5/5/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 70.05
AP - 00209739 5/5/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 62.45
AP - 00209739 5/5/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 288.30
AP - 00209739 5/5/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 8.08
AP - 00209740 5/5/2004 ABLAC 281.36
AP - 00209741 5/5/2004 ABLETRONICS 15.96
AP - 00209741 5/5/2004 ABLETRONICS 7.56
AP - 00209741 5/5/2004 ABLETRONICS 14.93
AP - 00209742 5/5/2004 ADAMS, DEBRA 383.58
AP - 00209743 5/5/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,254.00
AP - 00209743 5/5/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,221.00
AP - 00209743 5/5/2004 ADAMSON, RONALD 42.67
AP - 00209744 5/5/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 331.14
AP - 00209746 5/5/2004 AGUILERA, CONCETTA 15.00
AP ~ 00209748 5/5/2004 ALEGRIA, MELANIE 39.00
AP - 00209749 5/5/2004 ALL WELDING 160.00
AP - 00209750 5/5/2004 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 102.33
AP - 00209751 5/5/2004 ALUMINITE SOUTH INC. 301.30
AP - 00209752 5/5/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00
AP - 00209753 5/5/2004 AQUINO, GIOVANNA 25.00
AP - 00209753 5/5/2004 AQUINO, GIOVANNA 45.00
AP - 00209754 5/5/2004 ARCH WIRELESS 392.45
AP - 00209755 5/5/2004 ARCO NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO. 1,479.33
AP - 00209756 5/5/2004 ASSI SECURITY 75.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 05/12/2012
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209757 5/5/2004 ASSOCIATED AUTO BROKERS 23.00
AP - 00209758 5/5/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 14,136.00
AP - 00209759 5/5/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 257.80
AP - 00209759 5/5/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 101.33
AP - 00209759 5/5/2004 AUTO RESTORATORS INC 471.80
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 592.63
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 67.07
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 500.00
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 21.93
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 290.82
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 114.56
AP - 00209760 5/5/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 55.19
AP - 00209761 5/5/2004 BAKER, SHARI 600.00
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC 521,077.09
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART iNC 83,981.93
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC 127,953.18
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC -6,255.82
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC -12,795.32
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART [NC -12,238.26
AP - 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART [NC -8,398.19
AP 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC -52,107.71
AP 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC 122,382.60
AP 00209762 5/5/2004 BARNHART INC 62,558.19
AP 00209764 5/5/2004 BERKOWITZ, RON 65.00
AP 00209766 5/5/2004 BEVERIDGE, GEORGE 65.00
AP 00209767 5/5/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED 30.00
AP - 00209768 5/5/2004 BODY SHOTS 1,232.00
AP - 00209769 5/5/2004 BOGDANOFF, MICHAEL 65.00
AP - 00209770 5/5/2004 BONNEVILLE, SHIRLEY 40.00
AP - 00209770 5/5/2004 BONNEVILLE, SHIRLEY 40.00
AP - 00209771 5/5/2004 BORDNER, MARGIE 707.40
AP ~ 00209772 5/5/2004 BOYER SAFETY SERVICES 84.95
AP - 00209773 5/5/2004 BRODART BOOKS 234.91
AP - 00209774 5/5/2004 BROWER, DENISE 264.00
AP - 00209775 5/5/2004 BROWN, JACK 28.03
AP - 00209776 5/5/2004 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 535.70
AP - 00209777 5/5/2004 BRYNGELSON PRINTS 84.05
AP - 00209778 5/5/2004 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE 680,519.06
AP - 00209778 5/5/2004 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE 36,529.79
AP - 00209778 5/5/2004 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE -68,051.90
AP - 00209778 5/5/2004 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO,STEVE -3,652.98
AP - 00209779 5/5/2004 BURKE, KAREN 120.00
AP - 00209780 5/5/2004 C.W. DRIVER CONTRACTORS 20,452.00
AP - 00209781 5/5/2004 CADY, CORY 600.00
AP - 00209782 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK INC. 5,670.00
AP - 00209783 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00
AP - 00209783 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 22.50
AP - 00209784 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL 75.50
AP - 00209785 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,216.00
AP - 00209785 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 480.00
AP - 00209785 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 473.00
AP - 00209785 5/5/2004 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 238.00
AP - 00209786 5/5/2004 CAMERON, WILLIAM 20.00
AP - 00209787 5/5/2004 CAMPOS, MARIA 15.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
/¥
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209788 5/512004 CARBERRY, WAYNE 50.00
AP - 00209789 5/5/2004 CASTll J O, JESSIE 200.00
AP - 00209789 5/512004 CASTILLO, JESSIE 335.00
AP - 00209789 5/5/2004 CASTILLO, JESSIE 100.00
AP - 00209790 5/5/2004 CENTRAL SCHOOL PTO 72.58
AP - 00209791 515/2004 CHANCA, FERNANDO 65.00
AP - 00209792 5/5/2004 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 420.00
AP - 00209793 5/5/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 93,674.38
AP - 00209793 5/5/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 59,642.80
AP - 00209794 5/5/2004 CITY RENTALS 506.58
AP - 00209795 5/5/2004 CLARK, KAREN 398.00
AP - 00209796 5/5/2004 CLARK, KAREN 40.00
AP - 00209796 5/5/2004 CLARK, KAREN 40.00
AP - 00209797 5/5/2004 CLAYTON, JANICE 75.38
AP - 00209798 5/5/2004 COASTLINE COVER COMPANY 387.90
AP - 00209799 5/5/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 31.29
AP - 00209799 5/5/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 30.64
AP - 00209800 5/5/2004 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 1,881.00
AP - 00209801 5/5/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS ! 1.69
AP - 00209801 5/5/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 135.62
AP - 00209801 5/5/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 59.29
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORY', DAN 40.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN I0.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 20.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP - 00209802 5/5/2004 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 10.00
AP - 00209803 5/5/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP - 00209803 5/5/2004 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP - 00209804 5/5/2004 CRLJENICA, ANNETTE 30.00
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,752.10
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,640.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.18
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.06
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.60
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 284.21
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.53
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.77
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.95
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.19
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 334.96
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 502.93
AP ~ 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.51
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.07
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.56
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.59
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.28
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,272.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.33
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.45
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.24
AP - 0020980? . _ 5/~/2_004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364.51
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 15 Current Date: 05/12/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
/.5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.81
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 81.63
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.47
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.70
AP 00209807 51512004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 719.40
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,949.77
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.78
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 422.57
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 478.93
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.70
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 25.58
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 338.36
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 269.50
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT !,506.67
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.73
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,800.07
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 794.93
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,032.56
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 421.22
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.89
AP 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 27.82
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.14
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 31.20
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 28.96
AP - 00209807 5/5/2~4 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.38
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.73
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 385.00
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,169.83
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,020.96
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.62
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,853.93
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 287.88
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 737.78
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 959.95
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 324.95
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 322.72
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 731.63
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 575.51
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,525.75
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.53
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 543.14
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 412.29
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 973.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,193.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/20~M- CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 887.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,294.71
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.37
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.80
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.24
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,288.43
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 433.66
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.30
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 390.80
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 16 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:__ 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No.. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 528.62
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.03
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,445.31
AP - 00209807 5/5/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 299.32
AP - 00209808 5/5/2004 CUE, DONALD 64.00
AP - 00209809 5/5/2004 CUNNINGHAM, PATRICK 50.00
AP - 00209810 5/5/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 875.00
AP - 00209810 5/5/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 700.00
AP - 002098 l0 5/5/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP - 00209810 5/5/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 4,025.00
AP - 00209810 5/5/2004 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 1,050.00
AP - 00209811 5/5/2004 D AND B VISIONS 500.00
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 213.35
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 684.22
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 558.15
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 383.59
AP ~ 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,029.02
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 441.78
AP - 00209812 5/5/2004 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 515.05
AP - 00209813 5/5/2004 D.W. Mc CASLAND INC. 104.91
AP - 00209814 5/5/2004 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 626.40
AP - 00209816 5/5/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 47,131.25
AP - 00209816 5/5/2004 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 12,136.25
AP - 00209817 5/5/2004 DANCE TERRIFIC 3,294.82
AP - 00209818 5/5/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 582.32
AP - 00209818 5/5/2004 DAPPER TIRE CO 223.25
AP - 00209819 5/5/2004 DATA QUICK 93.50
AP - 00209820 5/5/2004 DAVIES, REBECCA 5.00
AP - 00209821 5/5/2004 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 160.00
AP - 00209822 5/5/2004 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 175.91
AP - 00209822 5/5/2004 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 273.16
AP - 00209823 5/5/2004 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 1,087.00
AP - 00209823 5/5/2004 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 898.01
AP - 00209823 5/5/2004 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 449.54
AP - 00209824 5/5/2004 DOMINGUEZ, EMILIA 20.00
AP - 00209825 5/5/2004 DOWNEY, KEISHA 49.00
AP - 00209826 5/5/2004 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 1,140.00
AP - 00209827 5/5/2004 DUI~YY, RICK 2,180.25
AP - 00209828 5/5/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 120.49
AP - 00209829 5/5/2004 DYAN, DIANE 721.50
AP - 00209830 5/5/2004 DYNASTY GYM 3,588.30
AP - 00209831 5/5/2004 ECOLOGY CONTROL INDUSTRIES 13,500.00
AP - 00209831 5/5/2004 ECOLOGY CONTROL INDUSTRIES 685.75
AP - 00209832 5/5/2004 EFFYCHIOU, AUDREY 150.00
AP - 00209834 5/5/2004 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 31.25
AP - 00209835 5/5/2004 ERIKSEN, ARNE F 250.00
AP - 00209836 5/5/2004 EWELL, MILENA 39.00
AP - 00209837 5/5/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 38.79
AP - 00209837 5/5/2004 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 422.38
AP - 00209838 5/5/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.54
AP - 00209839 5/5/2004 FELIX, ADRIAN 65.00
AP - 00209840 5/5/2004 FELIX, PAT 25.00
AP - 00209841 5/5/2004 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 412.82
AP - 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE~P_ERS_O._NNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00
--Dser:--A~IAX~V-ORTI~-- ~nn~H-awort~- Pa-g~'~ ~ ........ Current l~ate: ~)'~)12/~0~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
/'7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00
AP - 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 652.50
AP - 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00
AP - 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 783.00
AP 00209842 5/5/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 486.00
AP 00209843 5/5/2004 FLUORESCO LIGHTING 349.50
AP 00209844 5/5/2004 FOOTHILL AUTO BODY 1,271.84
AP 00209845 5~5~2004 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP 00209846 5/5/2004 FOUNTAIN OF LOVE FELLOWHIP INC. 305.00
AP 00209847 5/5/2004 FOX WEATHER LLC. 66.70
AP 00209848 5/5/2004 FYDAQ COMPANY INC 150.00
AP 00209849 5/5/2004 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING 13, 768.00
AP 00209850 5/5/2004 GIANT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER 252.91
AP 00209851 5/5/2004 GIN, CATHERINE 30.00
AP 00209852 5/5/2004 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 345.00
AP - 00209853 5/5/2004 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS 7 t5.00
AP ~ 00209854 5/5/2004 GONZALEZ, TINA 40.00
AP - 00209855 5/5/2004 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 2.00
AP - 00209856 5/5/2004 GUTIERREZ, REX 85.64
AP - 00209857 5/5/2004 HAKIMI, SUSAN 181.92
AP - 00209858 5/5/2004 HANG, RICHARD 30.00
AP - 00209859 5/5/2004 HANGER 18 LLC. 224.00
AP - 00209860 5/5/2004 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50
AP - 00209862 5/5/2004 HEILIG, KELLY 1,240.00
AP ~ 00209863 5/5/2004 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH 2,000.00
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 246.49
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 367.97
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 314.10
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 299.04
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 259.14
AP - 00209864 5/5/2004 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00209865 5/5/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 94.82
AP - 00209865 5/5/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 221.37
AP - 00209865 5/5/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 21.42
AP - 00209865 5/5/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 68.36
AP - 00209865 5/5/2004 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 36.12
AP - 00209866 5/5/2004 HOOPER, ALISON 750.00
AP - 00209867 5/5/2004 HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION 534.00
AP - 00209868 5/5/2004 HOSE MAN INC 646.79
AP - 00209869 5/5/2004 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00
AP - 00209871 5/5/2004 HOYT, RAYMOND 1,242.30
AP - 00209872 5/5/2004 HSU, STEVE 450.00
AP - 00209873 5/5/2004 HUGHES, BAMELGA 200.00
AP - 00209874 5/5/2004 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00209875 5/5/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 365.46
AP - 00209875 5/5/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 19.97
AP - 00209875 5/5/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 53.00
AP - 00209876 5/5/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 706.09
AP - 00209877 5/5/2004 IIMC 215.00
AP - 00209877 5/5/2004 IIMC 95.00
AP - 00209878 5/5/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 465.65
AP - 00209878 5/5/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 837.28
.... ~ - 0020_9_880 5/5/2004 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 527.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 18 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: __ 14:32:1
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209882 5/5/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 841.14
AP - 00209882 5/5/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 807.02
AP - 00209884 5/5/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.80
AP - 00209885 5/5/2004 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,462.50
AP - 00209886 5/5/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 28.01
AP - 00209886 5/5/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 187.16
AP - 00209889 5/5/2004 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 143.44
AP - 00209890 5/5/2004 INTUIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTI£ 4,552.50
AP - 00209890 5/5/2004 INTUIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTI£ 1,975.00
AP - 00209891 5/5/2004 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 189.73
AP - 00209892 5/5/2004 JACKETTI, WANDA 20.00
AP - 00209893 5/5/2004 JENNINGS, NANCY 65.00
AP - 00209894 5/5/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 675.00
AP - 00209895 5/5/2004 JONES, BOB 1,920.00
AP - 00209896 5/5/2004 JONES, JAMES 372.60
AP - 00209897 5/5/2004 JRC HOUSING 750.00
AP - 00209898 5/5/2004 JW'S AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 295.00
AP - 00209899 5/5/2004 K B HOMES 446.12
AP - 00209900 5/5/2004 KITAZAWA, YOSHIO 20.00
AP - 00209901 5/5/2004 KLEIN, BETHANY 64.00
AP - 00209902 5/5/2004 KNAPP ASSOCIATES 225.00
AP - 00209903 5/5/2004 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 4,100.00
AP - 00209903 5/5/2004 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 753.00
AP - 00209903 5/5/2004 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 708.50
AP - 00209904 5/5/2004 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 3,003.90
AP - 00209905 5/5/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 620.00
AP - 00209905 5/5/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 2,360.00
AP - 00209905 5/5/2004 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 176.03
AP - 00209906 5/5/2004 LAING, STEVE 65.00
AP - 00209908 5/5/2004 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 70.00
AP - 00209909 5/5/2004 LEII~'I~ER, LUKAS 328.50
AP - 00209910 5/5/2004 LEONHARDT, EILEEN 40.00
AP 00209911 5/5/2004 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS DIGEST 45.00
AP 00209912 5/5/2004 LIM, HEATHER 894.00
AP 00209913 5/5/2004 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS 1,297.14
AP 00209914 5/5/2004 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 737.70
AP 00209915 5/5/2004 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
AP 00209916 5/5/2004 MAGRUDER, KAREN 198.00
AP 00209917 5/5/2004 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENTINC 3,379.68
AP 00209917 5/5/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,656.03
AP 00209917 5/5/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,159.84
AP 00209917 5/5/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,975.13
AP 00209917 5/5/2004 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,664.31
AP 00209918 5/5/2004 MARK CHRIS INC 39.50
AP - 00209919 5/5/2004 MARQUEZ, ADRIANA 32.00
AP - 00209920 5/5/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 101.00
AP - 00209920 5/5/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 880.45
AP - 00209920 5/5/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 140.00
AP - 00209920 5/5/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 173.19
AP - 00209920 5/5/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 1,825.55
AP - 00209921 5/5/2004 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,018.70
AP - 00209922 5/5/2004 MARTINEZ, ARLENE 25.00
AP - 00209922 5/5/2004 MARTINEZ, ARLENE 21.00
AP - 00209923 5/5/2004 MARTINEZ, RAMON 15.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 19 Current Date: 05/12/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
lq
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209924 5/5/2004 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 108.34
AP - 00209925 5/5/2004 MCLEOD PLUMBING INC, SCOTT 77.40
AP - 00209926 5/5/2004 METROCALL [NC 474.03
AP - 00209928 5/5/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 35.98
AP - 00209928 5/5/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 138.95
AP - 00209928 5/5/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 17.99
AP - 00209928 5/5/2004 MIDWEST TAPE 66.97
AP - 00209929 5/5/2004 MILLIKEN, KEELY 1,200.00
AP - 00209930 5/5/2004 MITCHELL, WALTER Z 787.50
AP - 00209931 5/5/2004 MMASC 50.00
AP - 00209932 5/5/2004 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 145.34
AP - 00209933 5/5/2004 MOE, JOHN 360.00
AP - 00209934 5/5/2004 MOIJNTA[N VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 29.63
AP - 00209935 5/5/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 61.22
AP - 00209935 5/5/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 125.35
AP - 00209936 5/5/2004 MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING 300.00
AP - 00209937 5/5/2004 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 8.31
AP - 00209938 5/5/2004 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45
AP - 00209939 5/5/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 26,837.85
AP - 00209940 5/5/2004 NATIONS RENT 64.65
AP 00209941 5/5/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP 00209942 5/5/2004 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 100.00
AP 00209943 5/5/2004 NINYO AND MOORE GEOECHNICAL 850.00
AP 00209944 5/5/2004 NONSTOP PICTURES INC 133.00
AP 00209944 5/5/2004 NONSTOP PICTURES [NC 1,500.00
AP 00209945 5/5/2004 NYEHOLT, KATHRYN 70.00
AP 00209946 5/5/2004 OCLC LNC 49.80
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.93
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 58.38
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 65.77
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 67.67
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 18.02
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 461.65
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 11.40
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 94.04
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 137.22
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 138.95
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.09
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 25.86
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 298.46
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 454.10
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 253.72
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 354.39
AP ~ 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 3.89
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 60.61
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 139.88
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 28.40
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 58.70
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT i 18.27
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -85.80
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -83.09
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -14.16
AP- 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -13.93
A~°__- 90207_9~48 5/5_/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 28.73
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 20 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/I 1/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 63.62
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 174.70
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 126.14
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 7.05
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 203.67
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 6.09
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 18.36
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 3.20
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.70
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 966.52
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 315.99
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.41
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OVIqCE DEPOT 532.72
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 60.37
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.48
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -16.37
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -105.86
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -21.53
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -3.20
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 45.18
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 120.43
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 544.50
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 82.40
AP - 00209948 5/5/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 37.11
AP - 00209949 5/5/2004 OLIVIER, EVA 196.00
AP - 00209950 5/5/2004 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 722.40
AP - 00209951 5/5/2004 ONYX PAVING COMPANY INC 190.78
AP - 00209952 5/5/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 260.00
AP - 00209952 5/5/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 549.00
AP - 00209952 5/5/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 275.00
AP - 00209953 5/5/2004 OTT, LAURA 108.00
AP - 00209953 5/5/2004 OTT, LAURA 351.00
AP - 00209953 5/5/2004 OTT, LAURA 126.75
AP - 00209954 5/5/2004 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 60.12
AP - 00209955 5/5/2004 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 655.50
AP - 00209956 5/5/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUC'rS INC 700.00
AP - 00209956 5/5/2004 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 49.03
AP - 00209957 5/5/2004 PARCELL STEEL COMPANY INC 131.80
AP ~ 00209958 5/5/2004 PARKER, SHANNON 252.00
AP - 00209959 5/5/2004 PEP BOYS 27.96
AP - 00209959 5/5/2004 PEP BOYS 1.65
AP - 00209959 5/5/2004 PEP BOYS 43.49
AP - 00209959 5/5/2004 PEP BOYS 32.81
AP - 00209960 5/5/2004 PEREZ, HECTOR 40.00
AP - 00209961 5/5/2004 PEREZ, MANUELA 110.00
AP - 00209963 5/5/2004 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 5,186.00
AP - 00209964 5/5/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 12,360.59
AP - 00209966 5/5/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 715.50
AP - 00209966 5/5/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 762.75
AP - 00209967 5/5/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 879.99
AP - 00209967 5/5/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 297.52
AP - 00209967 5/5/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 270.44
AP - 00209967 5/5/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 69.32
_._ _A~__- 002~0_9967- 5/_5/2004_ P_O__MONA_ VALLEY KAWASAKI 88.30
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 21 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No.. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00209967 5/5/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 57.48
AP - 00209968 5/5/2004 POWER PLUS 25.00
AP - 00209969 5/5/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 170.25
AP - 00209970 5/5/2004 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,401.40
AP - 00209971 5/5/2004 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 998.74
AP - 00209972 5/5/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00209972 5/5/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8.00
AP - 00209973 5/5/2004 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00209974 5/5/2004 RADULESCLI, ELIADE 60.00
AP - 00209975 5/5/2004 RAMOS, JEANNE 30.00
AP - 00209976 5/5/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00
AP - 00209976 5/5/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00
AP - 00209977 5/5/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 14.82
AP - 00209977 5/5/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 1.89
AP - 00209977 5/5/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 16.27
AP - 00209978 5/5/2004 RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL 325.00
AP - 00209979 5/5/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00
AP - 00209979 5/5/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00
AP - 00209980 5/5/2004 REESE, JUNE 25.00
AP - 00209981 5/5/2004 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 7,625.74
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,808.00
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 791.00
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 32.00
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,012.45
AP q 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 336.00
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 15,740.98
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,695.77
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,766.17
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 15,718.05
AP - 00209982 5/5/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 13,978.47
AP - 00209983 5/5/2004 RIGGIO, LEANNE 65.00
AP - 00209984 5/5/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 465.48
AP - 00209985 5/5/2004 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP - 00209986 5/5/2004 ROBERT HALF TECI-INOLOGY 1,056.00
AP - 00209987 5/5/2004 ROMERO, EDMUND 27.00
AP - 00209988 5/5/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 128.53
AP - 00209988 5/5/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 88.44
AP - 00209990 5/5/2004 SALVIATI, MARTHA 216.00
AP - 00209991 5/5/2004 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 97.37
AP - 00209992 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 200.00
AP - 00209994 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS 171.28
AP - 00209995 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 273.00
AP - 00209996 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AGRICULTURAL COM3 8,472.61
AP - 00209997 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYIE 233.50
AP - 00209998 5/5/2004 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.00
AP - 00209999 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 276,699.36
AP - 00209999 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 12,933.06
AP - 00209999 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 44,595.60
AP - 00209999 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 55,864.12
AP - 00209999 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 26,452.58
AP - 00210000 5/5/2004 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 187.49
AP - 00210001 5/5/2004 SAN MANUEL BOTTLED WATER GROUP 9.60
AP - 00210002 5/5/_2004 _~NBAG/SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOV 6,578.55
User: AHAWOR~H - Ann Haworth Page: 22 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00210003 5/5/2004 SCACEO 65.00
AP - 00210004 5/5/2004 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 115.00
AP - 00210005 5/5/2004 SHRIVER, LORI 408.00
AP - 00210006 5/5/2004 SIERRA SPRINGS 94.35
AP - 00210007 5/5/2004 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 2,734.82
AP - 00210008 5/5/2004 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 140.08
AP - 00210009 5/5/2004 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00
AP - 00210011 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APWA 100.00
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.40
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.62
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.08
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.33
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.71
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.93
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SoIYr HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.92
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.39
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.82
AP 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS ON 22.77
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.76
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.70
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.71
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.04
AP - 00210012 5/5/20tM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.30
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.01
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.44
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.59
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.20
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47
AP - 00210012 5/5/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04
AP - 00210013 5/5/2004 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 405.16
AP - 00210014 5/5/2004 SPARKLETTS 94.50
AP - 00210015 5/5/2004 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 269.86
AP - 00210016 5/5/2004 STATEWIDE RENT A FENCE 455.80
AP - 00210017 5/5/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00210018 5/5/2004 STERLING COI~I~EE SERVICE 45.75
AP - 00210018 5/5/2004 STERLING COI~YEE SERVICE 247.55
AP - 00210019 5/5/2004 STETKEVICH, OREST 60.00
AP - 00210020 5/5/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 30.00
AP - 00210021 5/5/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 936,743.76
AP - 00210021 5/5/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -59,642.80
AP - 00210021 5/5/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -93,674.38
AP - 00210021 5/5/2004 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 596,427.97
AP - 00210023 5/5/2004 SUN, THE 160.80
AP - 00210024 5/5/2004 SUNAHARA, SEAN 25.00
AP - 00210025 5/5/2004 SUNRISE FORD 56.14
AP - 00210025 5/5/2004 SUNRISE FORD 60.58
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 23 Current Date: 05/12/20¢
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00210027 5/5/2004 TARGET IMPORT WAREHOUSE 40.00
AP - 00210028 5/5/2004 TARGET 45.98
AP - 00210029 5/5/2004 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GROUT 4,012.50
AP - 00210030 5/5/2004 TERRY, DONNA 612.00
AP - 00210031 5/5/2004 TIME WARNER TELECOM INC 1,278.70
AP ~ 00210032 5/5/2004 TOBIN, RENEE 11.83
AP - 00210033 5/5/2004 TOMMY AUSTIN'S FLORIST 140.08
AP - 00210033 5/5/2004 TOMMY AUSTINS FLORIST 142.23
AP - 00210034 5/5/2004 TORREZ, T1NO 50.00
AP - 00210034 5/5/2004 TORREZ, TINO 42.00
AP - 00210035 5/5/2004 TRACY, NANCY C 30.00
AP - 00210036 5/5/2004 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 6,585.86
AP - 00210037 5/5/2004 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL SERVICES INC 502.90
AP - 00210037 5/5/2004 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL SERVICES INC 717.08
AP - 00210038 5/5/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,995.00
AP - 00210038 5/5/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,066.00
AP - 00210038 5/5/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,795.00
AP - 00210039 5/5/2004 TUTORWHIZ INC 1,443.40
AP - 00210040 5/5/2004 TYPECARE 55.00
AP - 00210041 5/5/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 120.00
AP - 00210041 5/5/2004 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,001.50
AP - 00210043 5/5/2004 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 592.17
AP - 00210044 5/5/2004 UNITED WAY 586.32
AP - 00210045 5/5/2004 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 1,368.00
AP - 00210046 5/5/2004 UPLAND, CITY OF 858.41
AP - 00210047 5/5/2004 UPS 52.71
AP - 00210049 5/5/2004 VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 11,873.55
AP - 00210050 5/5/2004 VELASCO, BETTE 60.00
AP - 00210051 5/5/2004 VENTURA, LOUIS 364.00
AP - 00210052 5/5/2004 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 32.45
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 82.74
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 464.25
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 47.79
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 570.62
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 56.12
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 28.35
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 29.34
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 28.34
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 1,169.39
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 29.35
AP 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 57.05
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 74.04
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 29.28
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 28.35
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 402.55
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 28.88
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 29.12
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 131.96
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 47.06
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 42.54
AP - 00210053 5/5/2004 VERIZON 205.43
AP - 00210054 5/5/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00
AP - 00210054 5/5/2004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00
AP - 00210055 5/5/2004 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,034.85
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 24 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00210056 5/5/2004 VIZICAST MULTIMEDIA INC 22.86
AP - 00210057 515/2004 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP - 00210058 5/5/2004 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 237.05
AP - 00210059 5/5/2004 WARD, DESIREE 525.00
AP - 00210060 5/5/2004 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 77.12
AP - 00210060 5/5/2004 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 305.28
AP - 00210060 515/2004 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 358.80
AP - 00210060 5/5/2004 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 1,000.00
AP - 00210061 5/512004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 77.70
AP - 00210062 5/5/2004 WATSON, EILEEN 125.00
AP - 00210063 5/5/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 141.10
AP - 00210063 5/5/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 42.52
AP - 00210063 5/5/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 795.84
AP - 00210063 5/5/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 932.36
AP - 00210063 5/5/2004 WAX]E SANITARY SUPPLY 176.34
AP - 00210064 5/5/2004 WENGER, TWILA 39.50
AP - 00210064 5/5/2004 WENGER, TWILA 10.50
AP - 00210065 5/5/2004 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 490.14
AP - 00210066 5/5/2004 WEST GROUP 921.79
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 191.07
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 37.95
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 24.75
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 216.81
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 224.07
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 251.13
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY IvlRF LLC 202.62
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 176.22
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 227.37
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 159.06
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 174.90
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 243.21
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MR LLC 330.66
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 72.93
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 75.24
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 148.17
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 244.86
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 316.14
AP - 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 306.24
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WESTVALLEYMRFLLC 102.30
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 26.40
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 34.32
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 38.28
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 62.04
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 113.96
AP 00210067 5/5/2004 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 64.46
AP - 00210068 5/5/2004 WHITE, LARRY 50.00
AP - 00210070 5/5/2004 WRIGHT, JANET P 40.00
AP - 00210071 5/5/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 11,271.89
AP - 00210071 5/5/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00210071 5/5/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04
AP - 00210071 5/5/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00210071 5/5/2004 XEROX CORPORATION 112.86
AP - 00210072 5/5/2004 YEE, LARRY 69.00
AP - 00210073 5/5/2004 YELLOWSTONE CONSTRUCTION INC 200.00
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 25 Current Date: 05/12/20E
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 14:32:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
4/28/2004 through 5/11/2004
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00210074 5/5/2004 YWCA OF THE WEST END 165.00
AP - 00210075 5/5/2004 YWCA OF THE WEST END 1,027.51
AP - 00210076 5/5/2004 YWCA OF THE WEST END 165.00
AP - 00210077 5/5/2004 ZAILO, ROBERT 259.20
AP - 00210078 5/5/2004 ZWISSLER, JAMES 70.00
AP - 00210079 5/5/2004 CHiCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 420.00
AP - 00210081 5/5/2004 WALIYAR, ABDUL HAKIM 35.00
AP - 00210082 5/5/2004 MMASC 50.00
AP - 00210083 5/6/2004 GEOGRAPHICS 3,939.68
AP - 00210084 5/6/2004 LAM, JACK 50.00
AP - 00210084 5/6/2004 LAM, JACK 150.00
AP - 00210085 5/6/2004 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00
AP - 00210086 5/6/2004 YANCY, MICHELLE 15.00
AP - 00210087 5/10/2004 TANGRAM INTERIORS 967.68
Total for Cheek ID AP: 4,967,908.46
Total for Entity: 4,967,908.46
User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth
Page: 26 Current Date: 05/12/20C
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:
~,~i~14:32:1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
April 30, 2004
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency investment Funds 30,315,019.69 30,315,019.69 30,315,019.69 17.47 1 I 1.425 1.4zl5
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,520,482.33 1,515,000.00 087 733 485 2,150 2.180
Commercial Paper- Discount 8,000,000.00 7,989,261 67 7,989,261.67 4.61 47 16 1.021 1.036
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 133,750,000.00 132,352,029.05 133,658,418.75 77.05 1,526 1,270 3.245 3.290
Investments 173,580,019.69 172,176,792.74 173,477,700.11 100.00% 1,184 984 2.815 2.854
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking 1,282,91371 1,282,913.71 1,282,913~71 1 1 0.493 0,500
(not inciuded in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase 2o,989.65 2o,989.65
Subtotal 1,303,903.36 1,303,90336
Total Cash and Investments
174,862,933.40 173,480,696.10 174,781,603.47 1,184 984 2.815 2.854
Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Currant Year 384,884.30 3,758,861.78
Average Daily Balance 166,507,789.95 160,515,388.05
Effective Rate of Return 2.81% 2.80%
I certi~ that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted Mamh 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)~lnteractive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
govern the management of these funds.
Ja~ Tre surer
Portfolio CITY
CP
~ Date: PM (PRF_PM1) S~Rept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2004
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Market Value Rook Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Data
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYS00005 0c005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 30,315,019.69 30,315,019.69 30,315,019~69 1.445 1.425 1
Subtotal and Average 37,290,149.89 30,315,019.69 30,315,019.69 30,315,019.69 1.425 1
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050E6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,520,482.33 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 485 08/29/2005
Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,520,482.33 1,515,000.00 2.150 485
Commercial Paper - Discount
45974MEA2 1251 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 03/12/2004 5,000,000.00 4,991,641.67 4,991,641.67 1.020 1.022 9 05/10/2004
45974MEU8 1265 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 04/35/2004 3,000,000.00 2,997,620.00 2,997,620 O0 1.020 1.021 27 05/25/2004
Subtotal and Average 5,091,562.34 8,000,000.00 7,9~8,261.67 7,~9,261.67 1.021 16
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331LM88 1127 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/07/2002 2,000,000.00 2,000,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 5129 1,101 05/07/2007
31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,453,12500 2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 1,479 05/19/2008
31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2,000,000.00 1,967,500~00 2,000,CO0.00 3.210 3.166 1,494 06/05/2008
31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.00 6,403,750.00 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 1,042 05/09/2007
31331Q7C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0~15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,976,562.50 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 1,199 05/13/2007
31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 1,996,562 50 3370 3~370 1,241 09/24/2007
31331TGV7 1236 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,985,000.00 3,000,000.00 3.010 2869 1,091 04/27/2007
31331THR5 1241 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/10/2003 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.170 3.127 1,104 05/10/2007
31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,983,750.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 1,508 06/17/2008
31331TWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/17/2004 2,000,000.00 1,939,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3196 1,416 03/17/2008
31331T~NJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,867,500.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 1,661 11/17/2008
31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,000.00 3,502,187.50 3,479,000.00 3.920 4.012 1,640 10/27/2008
3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,018,750.00 2,984,531~25 6.230 6265 47 06/17/2004
31339X J J4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5,000,0~0.00 4,914,062.50 5,000,000 00 2.650 2.614 1,136 06/11/2007
31339XB78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0~1 5/2C03 3,000,000.00 2,945,625 00 3,000,00000 2.430 2.397 1,049 05/16/2007
31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,963,750,00 2,000,000.00 2,625 2.589 1,144 06/19/2007
31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/2003 2,000,000.00 1,943,125.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2~417 1,243 09/26/2007
31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,948,437.50 3,000,000.00 2.540 2.506 1,080 04/15/2007
3133XIP27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 3,005,625.00 3,000,000.00 4.000 3~945 1,640 10/27/2008
3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,996,250~00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3310 1,276 10/29/2007
3133X3E25 1248 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,C~30,000.00 1,994,37500 2,000,000.00 3~320 3.275 1,276 16/29/2007
3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 5,000,000.00 4,973,437.50 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 969 12/26/2006
3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 00/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,963,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.4.53 1,336 12/25/2007
Portfolio CITY
!
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2004
A~rage Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
CUSIP Invesbaent # issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133X5WA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,980,000.00 2,000,CO0.00 3.210 3.167 1,369 01/30/2008
3128X1BDE 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,971,720.13 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,479 05/19/2008
3128Xl FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 3,000,000.00 2,974,68613 3,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 941 11/28/2006
3128XIDK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP 05/28/2003 4,000,000.00 3,959,871.83 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 1,306 11/2~/2007
3128X1JDO 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 0~c~12/2003 5,00/),000.00 4,883,014.68 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 1,502 06/11/2008
3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,955,772.09 2,000,000.00 2.400 2.367 1,136 06/11/2007
3128XIL96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/08/2003 4,000,000.00 4,003,35205 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 869 09/17/2006
3128X12K2 1239 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/03/2003 4,0~O,000.00 4,010,471.80 3,983,125.00 4.010 4.048 1,635 15/22/2008
3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/30/2004 3,0~0,000.00 2,982,317.96 3,0CO,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,794 03/35/2009
3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,249,290.09 1,248,750.00 3.650 3.626 1,467 05/07/2008
3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,972,305.91 1,997,600.00 2920 2.916 1,266 10/19/2007
3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 996,799.01 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 1,273 10/26/2007
3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 5,005,239.87 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 1,276 10/29/2007
3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,005,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 753 05/24/2006
3136F3VQ6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 7,000,000.00 6,866,562.50 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 1,119 05/25/2007
3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 4,000,000.00 3,911,250.00 4,000,000~00 2500 2.466 1,171 07/16/2007
3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,C(30.00 3,936,250.00 3,993,750~00 3.300 3.289 1,550 07/29/~008
3136F4B45 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,991,875.00 2,000,000.00 3300 3.255 955 12/12/2006
3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,978,437.50 2,999,062.50 3.750 3707 1,682 12/08/2008
3156FSGP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/15/2004 4,000,000.00 3,987,500.00 4,000,000.00 4040 3.985 1,780 00/16/2009
3136F5PB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 988,750.00 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 1,259 10/12/2007
Subtotel and A~erage 122,454,917.08 133,750,000.00 132,352,029.05 133,658,418.75 3.245 1~70
Totel and Average 166,507,789.95 173,580,019.69 172,176,792.74 173,477,700.11 2.815 984
Portfolio CITY
CP
R.~3at e; PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
H
Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
April 30, 2004
Average Purchase Stated Y'FM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts
SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 1,282,913~71 1,282,913.71 1,282,913.71 0.500 0.493 1
Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 20,98865 20,989.65 1
Subtotal 1,303,903.36 1.303,903.36
Total Cash and Inveatmeatss 166,507,789.95 174,862,9~3.40 173,480,696.10 174,781,603.47 2.815 984
..~ Portfolio CITY
R~n Date: 05/12/2004 - 15:00 CP
~ PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 5
Activity By Type
April 1, 2004 through April 30, 2004
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
SYS(X)005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 1.445 5,131,863.85 12,400,000.00
Subtotal 37,583,155.84 5,131,863.85 12,4C~),000.00 30,315,019.69
Savings/Miscellanocus Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS00180 00180 SANK OF AMERICA 0.500 1,165,606,63 0.00
Subtotal 117,307.0~ 1,165,606.63 0,00 1~82,913.71
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,006.00
Commercial Paper - Discount
45974MEU8 1265 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 1.020 04/30/2004 2,997,620.00 0.00
Subtotal 4,991,641.67 2,997,620.00 0.O0 7,989,261.67
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331TGY1 1234 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT SANK 3.625 04/16v'2004 0.00 3,000,000.00
31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3920 04/29/2004 3,479,000.00 0.00
3133X5WA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3210 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 0.00
3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3650 04/12/2004 1,248,750.00 0.00
3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 2.920 04/19/2004 1,997,6(X).00 0.00
3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3.280 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 0.00
3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 3.450 04/29/2004 5,000,CO0.00 0.00
3136FSPB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 3.020 0/~12/2004 1,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 120,933,068.75 15,725,350.00 3,0(]0,000.00 133,658,418.75
Total 165,140,173.34 25,020,440.48 15,400,0~0.00 174,760,613.82
I[~ Portfolio CITY
~ cP
I~un Date: 05/12/2004 - 15:00 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended March 31, 2004
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Payinq Aqent Account Name Inveetment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment Distdct No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.47% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.47% 242,600.57
Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.46% 96.84
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 500,015.19
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.46% 580,734.82
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.47% 1,000,980.55
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.47% 119,587.03
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,791,302.40
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,291,317.59
* Note: These investments are money mad(et accounts which have no stated matudty date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
~ i:lfinanca~Cash with Fiscal Agents.xls 5/12/2004 2:43 PM
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~ANCHO CUCAH ONGA
StaffRepor
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVALOFAPPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR A WALKING
TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT FROM THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND GRANT
PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution that
authorizes staff to submit the grant application for funds for a walking trail/open
space project from the State of California Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant
Program.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City is interested in applying for a $300,000 grant from the Land and Water
Conservation Fund Program (LWCF) for a walking trail/open space development
project that would be located in Central Park. The proposed Project will provide
unpaved and paved trails and paths, shade structures, open turf area and
arboretum, restroom facilities, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking area,
fencing and walls. The walking trail/open space project is consistent with both the
recreational element of the City's General Plan and the Master Plan for Central Park.
The cost of the Project is estimated at $871,500. LWCF Program requires the City
to provide a "dollar to dollar" match. If the City's grant application is approved by the
State, the City will have to provide funds from other potential resources, such as
Park Development Fund. Since LWCF is a reimbursement program, the City is
expected to fund the entire Project. Upon completion of the Project, the City shall be
reimbursed for eligible costs up to the grant amount.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LWCF - WALKING TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION
May 19, 2004
Page 2
In 1958, President Eisenhower established the Outdoor Recreation Review
Commission to recommend future directions for conservation and outdoor
recreation. The Commission produced a report that has since shaped the nation's
conservation and outdoor recreation agenda. The most important recommendation
of the report led to the creation of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act by
Congress in 1965. Under the LWCF Program, the State established a "Priority
Recreation Venue Chart" which lists their priorities for evaluating grant applications.
Of nine recreational venues listed, trails ranked Priority 1 while open turf ranked
Priority 4. Campgrounds and arboretums ranked Priority 2 and 3, respectively.
The LWCF Program has been the single most important source behind the creation
of federal, state and local park systems. Additional federal legislation authorized the
LWCF Program to continue until December 15, 2015.
The State's allocation for FY2004 is $7.8 million. Of that amount, $4.2 million will be
divided between northern California (40%) and southern California (60%).
Respectfully ~ubmitted,
City Engineer
RESOLUTION "O.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER
CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR A WALKING
TRAIL/OPEN SPACE PROJECT AT CENTRAL PARK
WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized the
establishment of a federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant-In-Aid Program,
providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for
acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for
administration of the program in the State, setting up necessary rules and procedures
governing applications by the local agencies under the Program; and
WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Department of
Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of
applications and the availability of eligible matching funds prior to submission of said
applications to the State; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Walking Trail/Open Space Project at Central Park is
consistent with the Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Resoumes Plan: California
Outdoor Recreation Plan - 2002; and
WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those
jurisdictions immediately surrounding project:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY:
1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and Water Conservation Fund
assistance; and
2. Certifies that said agency has matching funds from the following source(s): Park
Development Fund and can finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will
be reimbursed; and
3. Certifies that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those
jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and
4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent of the Applicant to conduct all negotiations
and execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications,
contracts, amendments, payment requests, and compliance with all applicable
current state and federal laws which may be necessary for completion of the
aforementioned Project.
Approved and adopted on the 19th day of May, 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~ANCH 0 CU CAFiONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approval Of Resolution Authorizing The Implementation Of The
Provisions Of Internal Revenue Code Section (414)(h)(2) And
Allowing City Employees To Participate In The Pre-Tax Payroll
Deduction Plan For The purpose Of Purchasing CalPERS Service
Credits
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City council adopt the resolution authorizing the City to
implement the provisions of IRS Code Section 414(h)(2) and allowing City
employees to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan for the purpose of
purchasing CalPERS service credits.
BACKGROUND
The passage of Assembly Bill 719 allows eligible CalPERS members to purchase up
to five years of additional service credits that can be used towards retirement,
effective January 1, 2004. IRS Code Section 414(h)(2) allows employees who wish
to avail of this benefit to pay the cost through a pre-tax payroll deduction. To
implement a pre-tax payroll deduction for the purpose of purchasing service credits,
CalPERS requires the governing body of the agency to pass a resolution authorizing
its implementation and allowing the participation of its employees. The attached
resolution complies with CalPERS requirement described above.
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
H:\City Staff Repor[-Pre-tax Payroll Deduction.doc
RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'1/-' /~"~"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS
OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 414(h)(2) AND ALLOWING CITY
EMPLOYEES TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION
PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING CalPERS SERVICE CREDITS
WHEREAS, the Board of Administration of the Califomia Public
Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) at the April 1996 meeting approved a
pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service credit purchases under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) section 414(h)(2); and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has the authority to
implement the provisions of IRC section 4124(h)(2) and has determined that
even though implementation is not required by law, the tax benefit offered by this
section should be provided to those employees who are members of CalPERS;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga elects to participate in the
pre-tax payroll deduction plan for all eligible miscellaneous employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) will implement the provisions of
IRC section 414(h)(2) by making employee contributions for service credit
purchases pursuant to the California State Government Code on behalf of
its employees who are members of CalPERS and who have made a
binding irrevocable election to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction
plan. "Employee contributions" shall mean those contributions reported to
CalPERS which are deducted from the salary of employees and are
credited to individual employee accounts for service credit purchases,
thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions.
2. That the contributions made by the City to CalPERS, although designated
as employee contributions, are being paid by the City in lieu of
contributions by the employees who are members of CalPERS.
3. That the employees shall not have the option of choosing to receive the
contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid by the City to
CalPERS.
4. That the City shall pay to CalPERS the contributions designated as
employee contributions from the same source of funds as used in paying
salary, thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions.
5. That the effective date for commencement of the pre-tax payroll deduction
plan cannot be any eadier than July 1, 1996, or the date the completed
resolution is received and approved in CalPERS, whichever is later.
6. That the City Council of the City shall participate in and adhere to
requirements and restrictions of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan by
reporting pre-tax payroll deductions when authorized by CalPERS for
those employees who have elected to participate in this plan.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga this day of. 2004.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
By:
William Alexander
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, Secretary
TH E CITY OF
I~ANCiIO CU CAHONC, A
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 APPROPRIATIONS
RECOMMENDATION
It is requested that the City Council approve the attached fiscal year 2003/04 budgetary
adjustments for all City funds.
BACKGROUND
When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated
appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs.
In general, the attached schedules adjust estimated expenditures to reflect a more
current snapshot in all funds. Funding for items included in the adopted budget are
increased or decreased to reflect more recent experience. Adjustments have been
made for the reallocation of resources when a particular line item has not been fully
expended and is utilized for another area of operations. Also included in the adjusted
figures are two additional items: 1) funding for purchase orders that were originally
budgeted but were carried over from fiscal year 2002/03; and 2) funding for various
expenditures approved by the City Council during the course of the current fiscal year.
Carryover Purchase Orders. At the end of each fiscal year, there are a varying number
of financial commitments outstanding, due primarily to timing issues, which are recorded
in the City's financial records as purchase orders. A portion of the City's reserves is
procedurally set aside each year for funding these commitments in the subsequent
fiscal year. Although the initial budget appropriation for these purchase orders was
approved in the prior fiscal year, the outstanding commitment carries over into the
current fiscal year and must be funded in the current year's Amended Budget out of
reserves. Generally, these outstanding commitments are for capital projects or contract
services that are completed subsequent to the fiscal year in which they were approved.
Total carryover purchase orders for the City's General Fund amounted to approximately
$1.35 million.
i.'~finance~budget2OO4~staff repo/t-amended budget-City 03-04.doc
City Council Approve(;/Changes. During the course any fiscal year, the City Council
approves appropriation changes for items not anticipated during the budget preparation
process, including emergency repairs.
Annually, the City Council (Council) adopts the amended appropriations. There has
been no shift of estimated expenditures which deviates from the direction the Council
has requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are addressed, are
approved as separate Council items throughout the year.
The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year's budgeted
revenues and expenditures, the current year's (2003/04) adopted budget amounts, and
the 2003/04 amended budget amounts in each account area.
Respectfully submitted,
Tamara L. Layne
Finance Officer
Attachments
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Amended Fiscal Year 2003/04 Budget
REVENUES
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
FundfDescription Budget Budget Budget
001 GENERAL FUND 43,957,590 44,813,450 45,507,395
003 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT 16,000 15,000 15,000
006 CCWD REIMBURSEMENTS 75,000 54,750 55,280
007 CAL TRANS REIMBURSEMENTS 42,010 0 2,750
008 CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS 80,000 78,840 78,960
016 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SP, VCS FUND 529,800 398,400 719,580
025 CAPITAL RESERVE 3,420,920 2,088,000 9,651,260
073 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY 217,620 200,000 500,000
100 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN 605,560 673,960 686,160
101 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 246,820 251,320 0
105 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 152,750 189,240 225,050
110 BEAUTIFICATION 1,929,970 5,600,950 2,407,380
112 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL 5,202,730 3,967,780 4,081,520
114 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE 254,800 150,700 586,850
116 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 416,730 51,070 144,430
120 PARK DEVELOPMENT 5,417,010 6,839,510 5,249,260
122 SOUTH ETIWANDA DKAINAGE 700 280 280
124 TRANSPORTATION 12,803,690 12,480,460 5,596,930
126 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 24,630 188,740 230,310
130 LMD #1 GENERAL CITY 1,195,820 1,232,760 1,237,375
13l LMD #2 VICTORIA 2,512,260 2,573,470 2,598,180
132 LMD #3A HYSSOP 4,760 4,890 4,890
133 LMD #3B MEDIANS 822,410 948,850 962,250
134 LMD g4 TERRA VISTA 1,564,750 1,602,950 1,642,040
135 LMD #5 TOT LOT 7,500 7,400 6,130
136 LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY 430,130 433,850 434,110
137 LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 595,570 637,930 650,020
138 LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 25,420 31,340 31,620
139 LMD #9 LOWERETIWANDA 157,780 463,720 319,820
140 LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA 123,220 361,950 317,720
151 SLD#I ARTERIAL 584,480 605,050 601,090
152 SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL 290,410 292,230 333,930
153 SLD #3 VICTORIA 256,400 260,060 260,060
154 SLD g4 TERRA VISTA 153,370 182,130 149,030
155 SLD #5 CAP. YIN COMMUNITY 65,980 65,800 65,800
156 SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA 106,530 116,750 139,020
157 SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 44,040 68,630 60,910
158 SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 95,280 255,300 186,860
170 GAS TAX 2105/PROP111 1,352,940 805,110 927,540
172 GAS TAX 2106-2107 1,978,010 2,275,030 1,989,800
176 MEASURE "I" 4,119,620 3,218,410 6,955,460
180 SB 325 9,690 2,180 2,180
182 AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF 314,100 211,290 404,240
184 CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 100,000 100,000 0
186 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS 0 51,880 500,000
204 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GR2qT 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
208 TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 4,650 2,650 2,650
214 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 37,000 16,000 16,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
SLrMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget
216 PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND 930 930 930
225 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT 42,620 38,660 65,750
226 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 57,360 42,270 69,620
230 REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV 0 0 20,000
232 SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT 100,000 100,000 100,000
234 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 168,700 199,990 199,990
236 PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
237 PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL 10,000,000 10,000,000 4,667,500
238 PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
239 FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DRIER 50,000 50,000 854,740
240 MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
244 CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM 0 0 87,780
250 RECREATION SERVICES 1,866,410 2,033,860 1,996,350
252 YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT 385,820 315,400 306,930
258 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT 1,000 1,000 1,000
266 TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE 29,550 0 0
268 TARGET LITERACY GRANT 0 0 5,000
290 LIBRARY FUND 1,891,680 1,816,180 2,468,630
298 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 53,490 50,020 49,150
302 LIBRARY SERVICES & TECH. ACT 6,650 0 0
308 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT 26,870 26,870 20,640
310 PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 0 0 800,000
352 COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL 125,000 125,000
354 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE 284,450 120,900 283,490
365 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 2,320 2,320 0
367 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2001 2,160 0 0
368 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 0 0 71,250
369 COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT 0 160,000 160,000
370 OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT 0 0 8,580
380 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT 0 0 32,790
382 COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT 0 0 15,470
384 OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT 0 0 27,000
600 AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL 162,900 166,440 4,000
602 AD 84-1 DAY CREEKfMELLO 750,000 29,000 15,000
604 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL 41,880 21,520 100
606 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT 0 53,390 180
608 CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK 553,680 0 0
612 CFD 2001-01 18,462,610 257,000 15,896,430
614 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND 0 14,073,100 14,201,850
615 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER 0 5,814,000 5,814,000
700 SPORTS COMPLEX 1,470,240 1,446,960 1,482,120
705 MUNICIPAL UTILITY 0 0 8,584,850
712 EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 712,810 450,000 508,880
714 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND 625,500 504,410 212,750
800 AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND 258,970 0 0
801 AD 82-IR RESERVE FUND 158,760 3,380 0
805 CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND 1,827,060 1,861,390 1,786,780
812 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT 313,130 314,410 406,990
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Fund/Description Budget Budget Budget
813 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR 126,700 106,170 59,000
815 CFD 88-2 POLICE 1,990 800 710
838 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON 38,840 36,050 39,480
841 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 0 0 251,770
842 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 429,560 432,390 484,930
848 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND 1,993,630 2,000,240 1,877,190
850 PD 85 RESERVE FUND 61,870 54,000 31,500
852 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN 170,370 167,250 143,780
854 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION 525,750 539,550 565,180
856 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP 0 553,680 534,140
860 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION 0 1,136,900 436,200
861 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE 0 22,000 22,000
862 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION 71,980 86,200 84,420
863 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE 0 2,500 2,500
864 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN 0 1,379,220 . 543,890
865 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE 0 1,535,610 1,535,610
866 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN 0 271,000 104,480
867 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE 0 299,370 299,370
Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 142,241,980 150,089,160 171,315,120
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
(001)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,820,500 1,880,490 1,888,030
4102 - Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 109,780 112,910 104,970
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 94,500 104,330 107,850
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 81,980 88,330 100,240
4105 - Property Taxes-Supplemental 53,680 75,630 61,320
4106 - Property Taxes-Unitary 119,430 118,150 119,380
4107 - Property Transfer Tax 571,900 730,540 1,043,040
4120 - Sales and Use Tax 14,200,000 14,626,000 15,800,000
4121 - Prop 172-Half Cent Sales Tax 283,210 299,500 322,560
4125 - Transient Occupancy Tax 188,890 206,690 248,080
4130 - Franchise Fee-Gas & Electric 3,554,840 2,423,180 2,300,000
4131 - Franchise Fee-Resid. Refuse 1,074,680 1,173,370 1,207,500
4132 - Franchise Fee-Comm. Refuse 1,250,460 1,309,000 1,475,700
4133 - Franchise Fee-Cable 803,210 889,260 981,660
4201 - Business Licenses 1,500,000 1,700,000 1,700,000
4202 - Bicycle License 90 90 180
4207 - Building Permits 2,355,000 2,676,200 2,700,000
4220 - Other Licenses & Permits 48,000 80,000 69,860
4301 - Vehicle Code Fines 300,000 300,000 353,800
4302 - Parking Citations 110,000 114,000 114,000
4306 - Vehicle Release Fees 110,000 115,000 120,470
4307 - Citation Proof of Corr Fees 800 800 870
4308 - General Ordinance Fines 41,820 72,180 59,490
4309 - False Alarm Fees 12,000 12,000 45,000
4310 - Loud Party Ordinance Fines 700 700 1,800
4311 - Booking Fees Reimbursement 0 0 1,600
4314 - Red Light Fines 0 442,500 70,380
4401 - Interest Earnings 840,000 500,000 503,950
4419 - Other Rental/Lease Income 50,400 68,830 52,060
4440 - Sale &Fixed Assets 30,000 30,000 115,510
4501 - Plan Check Fees 1,300,000 1,640,000 1,700,000
4507 - Building & Safety-Special Serv 25,000 15,000 8,400
4508 - Planning Fees 700,000 800,000 800,000
4509 - Planning- Special Services Fee 50,000 50,000 373,430
4510 - Engineering Fees 2,200,000 1,209,680 1,580,600
4511 - Engineering - Special Services 50,000 50,000 100,000
4525 - Emergency Prep Spec Prog Fees 15,000 15,000 15,000
4530 - DARE Program Promo & Cont 0 0 50,000
4560 - Fingerprint Fees 10,000 10,000 10,000
4563 - Candidates Filing Fees 6,900 0 0
4564 - Returned Item Charge 670 460 750
4565 - Passport Processing Fees 11,000 25,000 45,000
4567 - Passport Photo Fees 7,000 7,000 7,500
4570 - Sale of Printed Materials 107,000 110,000 115,100
4701 - Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Fees 8,026,770 8,582,310 5,921,790
4705 - Off-Highway License Fees 2,710 3,700 4,750
4710 - Homeowners Property Tax Relief 60,100 69,220 70,000
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 13,160 13,500 15,450
4901 - Other Revenue 6,000 6,000 440,540
4905 - Contributions/Fund Raising 0 15,000 15,000
q/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4910 - DARE Program Reimbursement 132,250 140,180 32,980
4911 - Reimbursement from Other Funds 1,548,160 1,735,190 1,765,870
4914 - Non-Abated Reimbursements 80,000 5,000 5,000
8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 0 0 49,510
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 161,530 711,425
Total For Fund 001: 43,957,590 44,813,450 45,507,395
REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003)
4303 - Parking Cit Surcharge-State 6,500 6,000 6,000
4304 - Parking Cit Surchrge-Cnty Jail 4,750 4,500 4,500
4305 - Parking Cit Surcharge-Cnty Crt 4,750 4,500 4,500
Total For Fund 003: 16,000 15,000 15,000
CCWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006)
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 75,000 54,750 54,750
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 530
Total For Fund 006: 75,000 54,750 55,280
CAL TRANS REIMBURSEMENTS (007)
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Rcimbursemnt 13,500 0 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 28,510 0 2,750
Total For Fund 007: 42,010 0 2,750
CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (608)
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 80,000 78,840 78,840
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 120
Total For Fund 008: 80,000 78,840 78,960
COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND (016)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 15,000 15,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 529,800 383,400 704,580
Total For Fund 016: 529,800 398,400 719,580
CAPITAL RESERVE (025)
4401 - Interest Eurnings 2,097,960 1,500,000 1,500,000
4911 - Reimbursement from Other Funds 588,000 588,000 588,000
8110 - Transfer In-Beantification 155,000 0 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 579,960 0 7~563,260
Total For Fund 025: 3,420,920 2,088,000 9,651,260
BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073)
4401 - Interest Earnings 217,620 94,080 94,080
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
8999 - Transfer In Frum Fund Balance 0 105,920 405,920
Total For Fund 073: 217,620 200,000 500,000
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100)
4401 - Interest Earnings 9,330 9,330 3,500
4901 - Other Revenue 583,700 664,630 682,050
8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 0 0 610
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 12,530 0 0
Total For Fund 100: 605,560 673,960 686,160
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 239,320 242,820 0
4401 - Interest Earnings 5,320 8,500 0
8999 - Transfer In Frnm Fund Balance 2,180 0 0
Total For Fund 101: 246,820 251,320 0
AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105)
4401 - Interest Earnings 2,620 800 800
4740 - Grant Income 135,980 153,570 153,570
8999 - Transfer In Frnm Fund Balance 14,150 34,870 70,680
Total For Fund 105: 152,750 189,240 225,050
BEAUTIFICATION (110)
4401 - Interest Earnings 115,540 66,110 66,110
4740 - Grant Income 0 3,522,810 0
4801 - Beautification Fees 253,400 377,000 550,000
4802 - Developer Participation 350,000 0 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 1,211,030 1,635,030 1,791,270
Total For Fund 110: 1,929,970 5,600,950 2,407,380
DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112)
4401 - Interest Earnings 116,980 121,060 121,060
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 1,200,000 0 0
4806 - Storm Drain Fees 585,000 654,450 1,700,000
8999 - Transfer In Frnm Fund Balance 3,300,750 3,192~270 2,260,460
Total For Fund 112: 5,202,730 3,967,780 4,081,520
DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE (114)
4401 - Interest Earnings 122,400 64,990 64,990
4807 - Secondary Regional Fee 132~400 85,710 521,860
Total For Fund 114: 254,800 150,700 586,850
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116)
4401 - Interest Earnings 18,350 11,070 11,070
4807 - Secondary Regional Fee 224,800 40,000 133,360
8999 - Transfer In Fgom Fund Balance 173,580 0 0
Total For Fund 116: 416,730 51,070 144,430
PARK DEVELOPMENT (120)
4401 - Interest Earnings 217,330 145,480 145,480
4800 - Park Development Fees 1,044,300 766,820 2,175,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 4,155,380 5,927,210 2,928,280
Total For Fund 120: 5,417,010 6,839,510 5,249,260
SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (122)
4401 - Interest Eamfl~gs 700 280 280
Total For Fund 122: 700 280 280
TRANSPORTATION (124)
4401 - Interest Earnfltgs 353,190 288,000 288,000
4804 - Transportation Fee/Backbone 1,813,090 2,039,700 4,415,400
4805 - Transportation Fee/EV Preemptn 18,310 20,600 41,600
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 10,619,100 10,132,160 851,930
Total For Fund 124: 12,803,690 12,480,460 5,596,930
LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126)
4401 - Interest Earnings 24,630 19,910 19,910
4806 - Storm Drain Fees 0 168,830 133,360
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 77,040
Total For Fund 126: 24,630 188,740 230,310
LMD #1 GENERAL CITY (130)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 954,100 977,560 1,020,490
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 9,380 15,000 15,000
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 7,130 10,500 3,000
4401 - Interest Earnings 52,690 52,690 26,000
4901 - Other Revenue 0 650 22,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 172,520 176,360 150,385
Total For Fund 130: 1,195,820 1,232,760 1,237,375
LMD #2 VICTORIA (131)
4101 - Proper~ Taxes-CY Secured 2,060,330 2,113,720 2,175,100
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 28,000 40,000 40,000
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,760 2,500 7,250
4401 - Interest Earnings 82,680 82,680 42,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4901 - Other Revenue 0 0 10,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 338,490 334,570 323,330
Total For Fund 131: 2,512,260 2,573,470 2,598,180
LMD #3A HYSSOP (132)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 3,180 3,310 3,310
4401 - Interest Earnings 1,580 1,580 1,580
Total For Fund 132: 4,760 4,890 4,890
LMD #3B MEDIANS (133)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 686,780 733,540 742,780
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 33,600 15,000 10,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 7,290 2,500 1,250
4401 - Interest Earnh~gs 56,380 56,380 27,500
4901 - Other Revenue 0 0 1,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 38~360 141,430 178,720
Total For Fund 133: 822,410 948,850 962,250
LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,298,480 1,379,910 1,419,250
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 15,180 15,000 15,000
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 3,040 2,500 2,500
4401 - Imerest Earnings 85,720 85,720 37,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 162,330 119,820 167,790
Total For Fund 134: 1,564,750 1,602,950 1,642,040
LMD #5 TOT LOT (135)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4,730 4,630 4,580
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 100 100 200
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 20 20 50
4401 - Interest Earnings 2,650 2,650 1,300
Total For Fund 135: 7,500 7,400 6,130
LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 292,380 292,610 302,050
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4,270 4,270 5,250
4104 - Property Taxe*-Penalties/Int. 590 700 830
4401 - Interest Earnings 24,270 24,270 11,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 108,620 112,000 114,980
Total For Fund 136: 430,130 433,850 434,110
LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 404,570 442,030 456,610
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BIYDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 14,060 9,000 12,250
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,810 2,810 2,810
4401 - Interest Earnings 40,060 40,060 50,060
4419 - Other Rental/Lease Income 0 0 18,390
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 134,070 144,030 109,900
Total For Fund 137: 595,570 637,930 650,020
LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 21,320 21,080 21,780
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 760 760 350
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 90 90 90
4401 - Interest Earnings 3,250 3,250 3,250
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 6,160 6,150
Total For Fund 138: 25,420 31,340 31,620
LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 150,120 454,410 309,260
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 0 1,500 2,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 0 150 400
4401 - Interest Earnings 7,660 7,660 7,660
Total For Fund 139: 157,780 463,720 319,820
LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA (140)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 89,860 359,450 314,070
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 2,500 3,650
8999 - Transfer In Frnm Fund Balance 33,360 0 0
Total For Fund 140: 123,220 361,950 317,720
SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 526,100 570,190 579,040
4103 - Propemy Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 10,870 7,500 7,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 2,170 1,750 1,750
4401 - Interest Earnings 22,810 22,810 10,000
4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 4,820 2,800 2,800
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 17~710 0 0
Total For Fund 151: 584,480 605,050 601,090
SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL (152)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 248,400 260,460 269,200
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4,030 6,000 4,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,450 1,450 1,000
4401 - Interest Earnings 6,570 9,050 1,000
4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 6,650 500 1,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 23,310 14,770 56,730
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 152: 290,410 292,230 333,930
SLD #3 VICTORIA (153)
4101 - Property Taxe:~-CY Secured 227,490 233,990 240,050
4103 - Property Taxe:~-PY Sec & Unsec 5,950 5,950 4,500
4104 - Propeay Taxes-Penalties/Ira. l, 180 1,180 900
4401 - Interest Earnings 15,470 15,470 9,600
4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 2,640 2,640 4,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 3,670 830 510
Total For Fund 153: 256,400 260,060 260,060
SLD #4 TERRA VISTA (154)
4101 Property Taxe3-CY Secured 122,250 160,590 130,930
4103 Property Taxe3-PY Sec & Unsec 1,850 1,850 1,850
4104 Property Taxe:~-Penalfies/int. 380 380 380
4401 Interest Earnings 19,310 19,310 11,500
4808 Developer Energizing Fee 9,580 0 1,250
8999 Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 3,120
Total For Fund 154: 153,370 182,130 149,030
SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 40,960 40,990 4t,880
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 1,110 1,110 1,110
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 220 220 220
4401 - Interest Earnings 5,080 5,570 2,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 18,610 17,910 20,090
Total For Fund 155: 65,980 65,800 65,800
SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156)
4101 - Proper~ Taxes-CY Secured 94,330 102,090 130,310
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 1,550 1,550 1,550
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 310 310 310
4401 - Interest Earnings 8,870 10,800 5,600
4808 ~ Developer Energizing Fee 1,470 2,000 1,250
Total For Fund 156: 106,530 116,750 139,020
SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 32,440 54,400 54,430
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 1,380 1,380 1,380
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 280 280 350
4401 - Interest Earnings 6,130 6,570 4,500
4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 3,810 6,000 250
Total For Fund 157: 44,040 68,630 60,910
6/7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158)
4101 - Property Taxcs-CY Secured 88,590 246,320 174,310
4103 - Property Taxcs-PY Sec & Unsec 400 650 1,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 60 150 250
4401 - Interest Earnings 5,780 6,180 4,800
4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 450 2,000 6,000
Total For Fund 158: 95,280 255,300 186,860
GAS TAX 2105/PROPlll (170)
4401 ~ Interest Earnings 55,820 21,470 21,470
4720 - Gas Tax 2105-Prop 111 793,800 738,000 738,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 503,320 45,640 168,070
Total For Fund 170: 1,352,940 805,110 927,540
GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172)
4401 - Interest Earnings 27,280 13,970 13,970
4721 - State Gas Tax.-2106 456,600 465,770 465,770
4722 - State Gas Tax-2107 1,028,800 1,049,230 1,049,230
4723 - State Gas Tax.-2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 455,330 736,060 450.830
Total For Fund 172: 1,978,010 2,275,030 1,989,800
MEASURE "I" (176)
4401 - Interest Earaings 196,950 113,370 113,370
4715 - Measure ! Local St Allotment 1,155,800 1,236,170 1,236,170
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 2,766,870 1,868,870 5,605,920
Total For Fund 176: 4,119,620 3,218,410 6,955,460
SB 325 (180)
4401 - Interest Earnings 9~690 2,180 2~ 180
TQtal For Fund 180: 9,690 2,180 2,180
AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182)
4401 - Interest Earnings 37,600 5,740 5,740
4740 - Grant Income 276,500 0 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 205,550 398,500
Total For Fund 182: 314,100 211,290 404,240
CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (184)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 100,000 100,000 0
Total For Fund 184: I00,000 100,000 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186)
4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 0 0 500,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 51,880 0
Total For Fund 186: 0 51,880 500,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204)
4740 - Grant Income 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
Total For Fund 204: 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 4,650 2~650 2,650
Total For Fund 208: 4,650 2,650 2,650
PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 {214)
4740 - Grant Income 37,000 16,000 16,000
Total For Fund 214: 37,000 16,000 16,000
PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND (216)
4401 - Interest Earnings 930 930 930
Total For Fund 216: 930 930 930
CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225)
4740 - Grant Income 36,120 36,120 36,120
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 6~500 27540 29~630
Total For Fund 225: 42,620 38,660 65,750
USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226)
4740 - Grant Income 54,300 42,000 42,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 3,060 270 27,620
Total For Fund 226: 57,360 42,270 69,620
REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV (230)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 20,000
Total For Fund 230: 0 0 20,000
SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total For Fond 232: 100,000 100,000 100,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234)
4740 - Grant Income 168~700 199,990 199,990
Total For Fund 234: 168,700 199,990 199,990
PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236)
4740 - Grant Income 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Total For Fund 236: 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL (237)
4740 - Grant Income 10,000,000 10,000,000 4,667,500
Total For Fund 237: 10,000,000 10,000,000 4,667,500
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238)
4740 - Grant Income 1,000~000 1 ~000~000 974,250
Total For Fund 238: 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DRIER (239)
4740 - Grant Income 50,000 50,000 854,740
Total For Fund 239: 50,000 50,000 854,740
MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240)
4740 - Grant Income 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Total For Fund 240: 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 87,780
Total For Fund 244: 0 0 87,780
RECREATION SERVICES (250)
4401 - Interest Earnings 20,920 20,920 19,200
4520 - Recreation Fees 1,758,750 1,915,000 1,956,120
4571 - Sale of Taxable Items 750 750 0
8025 - Transfer In-Capital P. srv Fund 0 0 4,960
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 85,990 97,190 16,070
Total For Fund 250: 1,866,410 2,033,860 1,996,350
YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252)
4740 - Gram Income 385,820 308,800 305,390
4741 - Program Income 0 6,600 1,220
8025 - Transfer In-Capital P. srv Fund 0 0 320
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 252: 385,820 315,400 306,930
SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258)
4740 - Grant Income 1,000 1,000 1,000
Total For Fund 258: 1,000 1,000 1,000
TEEN AFTER SCHOOL PROG GRANT (260)
TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE (266)
4740 - Grant Income 29,550 0 0
Total For Fund 266: 29,550 0 0
TARGET LITERACY GRANT (268)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 5,000
Total For Fund 268: 0 0 5,000
LIBRARY FUND (290)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,176,130 1,287,560 1,836,650
4102 - Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 42,430 48,000 53,020
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 35,990 44,500 54,480
4105 - Property Taxes-Supplemental 14,520 32,000 50,630
4312 - Library Fines and Fees 120,000 118,000 120,000
4401 - Interest Earnings 33,990 15,000 18,000
4410 - Media Rentals 80,000 88,000 95,000
4514 - Technology Center Revenue 10,000 8,000 8,000
4515 - Information Service Fees 3,000 1,500 1,500
4570 - Sale of Printed Materials 8,000 5,000 4,200
4906 - CLSA Direct Loan 89,000 0 65,000
4907 - Private Contributions Library 80,000 80,000 60,000
4908 - Public Library Foundation 110,000 0 52,000
8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 38,620 38,620 0
8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 50,000 50,000 50,150
Total For Fund 290: 1,891,680 1,816,180 2,468,630
ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT (294)
CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298)
4740 - Grant Income 7,750 5,000 31,470
4905 - Conlxibutions/'Fund Raising 0 0 1,580
4909 - RC Libra~ Foundation Support 10,000 10,000 0
8290 - Transfer In-Library Fund 35,020 35,020 16,100
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 720 0 0
Total For Fund 298: 53,490 50,020 49,150
LIBRARY SERVICES & TECH. ACT (302)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4740 - Grant Income 6,650 0 0
Total For Fund 302: 6,650 0 0
FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308)
4740 - Gram Income 13,000 13,000 0
8290 - Transfer In-Library Fund 13,870 13,870 20,640
Total For Fund 308: 26,870 26,870 20,640
PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 800,000
Total For Fund 310: 0 0 800,000
COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL (352)
4740 - Grant Income 125,000 125,000 0
Total For Fund 352: 125,000 125,000 0
COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (35,1)
4401 - Interest Earnings 20,900 20,900 8,360
4740 - Grant Income 100,000 100,000 219,360
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 163,550 0 55,770
Total For Fund 354: 284,450 120,900 283,490
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK '98 (362)
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 (365)
4401 - Interest Earnings 2,320 2,320 0
Total For Fund 365: 2,320 2,320 0
CA LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (366)
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2001 (367)
4401 - Interest Earnings 2,160 0 0
Total For Fund 367: 2,160 0 0
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 45,690
8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 0 0 12,210
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 13,350
Total For Fund 368: 0 0 71,250
COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT (369)
4740 - Grant Income 0 160,000 160,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 369: 0 160,000 160,000
OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT (370)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 8,580
Total For Fund 370: 0 0 8,580
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 32~790
Total For Fund 380: 0 0 32,790
COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 15,470
Total For Fund 382: 0 0 15,470
OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT (384)
4740 - Grant Income 0 0 27,000
Total For Fund 384: 0 0 27,000
AD 82-I 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL (600)
4401 - Interest Earwigs 4,140 2,000 4,000
8801 - Transfer In-82-1R Reserve 158,760 0 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 164,440 0
Total For Fund 600: 162,900 166,440 4,000
AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602)
4401 - Imerest Earnings 48,700 29,000 15,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 701,300 0 0
Total For Fund 602: 750,000 29,000 15,000
AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 500 100
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 41 ~880 211020 0
Total For Fund 604: 41,880 21,520 100
AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 1,000 180
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 52,390 0
Total For Fund 606: 0 53,390 180
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK (608)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 532,390 0 0
4401 - Interest Earnings 21,290 0 0
Total For Fund 608: 553,680 0 0
CFD 2001-01 (612)
4401 - Interest Earnings 250,000 100,000 100,000
4930 - Advances from Other Funds 0 57,000 57,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 18,212,610 100,000 15,739,430
Total For Fund 612: 18,462,610 257,000 15,896,430
CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 183,820 183,820
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 8,706,310 8,706,310
4930 - Advances from Other Funds 0 2,458,720 2,458,720
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 2,724,250 2,853,000
Total For Fund 614: 0 14,073,100 14,201,850
CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER (615)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 114,000 114,000
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 5,700,000 5,700,000
Total For Fund 615: 0 5,814,000 5,814,000
SPORTS COMPLEX (700)
4126 - Admissions Tax 146,400 29,000 29,300
4220 - Other Licenses & Permits 500 500 400
4411 - Special Event Rental 36,000 36,000 34,000
4425 - Stadium Lease-Parking Lt Reimb 72,000 72,000 72,000
4426 - Stadium Lease-Minimum Rent 0 70,000 68,440
4427 - Stadium Lease-Addt'l Rent (%) 0 20,000 45,890
4428 - Stadium Lease-Office Rent 4,150 4,150 4,150
4520 - Recreation Fees 387,600 396,880 402,990
4562 - Maintenance Fees 24,000 24,000 33,000
4573 - Concession Sales 2,400 4,500 2,800
4580 - Stadium Security Reimbursement 70,000 71,250 71,500
4582 - Special Events 0 400 200
4583 - Baseball Secm'ity Reimb. 42,000 42,000 37,000
4585 - Parking Fees-Sports Complex 35,000 29,000 31,000
4901 - Other Revenue: t2,000 12,000 12,000
8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 638,190 635,280 635,280
8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 0 0 2,170
Total For Fund 700: 1,470,240 1,446,960 1,482,120
MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4601 - Monthly Srvc Fee-Elec~ic Util 0 0 1,340
4602 - Commodity Fee-Electric Util. 0 0 27,660
4603 - New Srvc Activation Fee-Util. 0 0 12,000
4604 - Dist Line Ext Fee-Elec Utility 0 0 289,000
8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 0 0 8,254,850
Total For Fund 705: 0 0 8,584,850
EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712)
4401 - Interest Earnings 712,810 450,000 350,000
8999 - Transfer In From Ftmd Balance 0 0 158,880
Total For Fund 712: 712,810 450,000 508,880
COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714)
4401 - Interest Earniugs 291,090 170,000 130,000
4540 - Intragovernmental User Fees 334,410 334,410 35,120
4914 - Nun-Abated Reimbursements 0 0 14,970
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 32,660
Total For Fund 714: 625,500 504,410 212,750
AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND (800)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 258,970 0 0
Total For Fund 800: 258,970 0 0
AD 82-1R RESERVE FUND (801)
4401 - Interest Earnings 3,380 3,380 0
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 155,380 0 0
Total For Fund 801: 158,760 3,380 0
CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 715,980 761,390 768,280
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 32,500 32,500 8,000
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 7,500 7,500 1,500
4401 - Interest Earnings 52,100 85,000 34,000
4935 - Contributed Capital 975,000 975,000 975,000
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 43,980 0 0
Total For Fund 805: 1,827,060 1,861,390 1,786,780
AD 84-2 REDEMPTION FUND (807)
AD 86-2 REDEMPTION FUND (810)
CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT (812)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 262,580 262,280 263,280
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 5,000 5,500 5,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 1,250 1,250 1,750
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4401 - Interest Earnings 44,300 45,380 20,000
8842 - Transfer In-CFD 93-3 0 0 116,460
Total For Fund 812: 313,130 314,410 406,990
CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR (813)
4401 - Interest Earnings 126,700 106,170 59,000
Total For Fund 813: 126,700 106,170 59,000
CFD 88-2 POLICE (815)
4401 - Interest Earnings 1,290 100 10
8812 - Transfer In-AD 88-2 Debt Srvc. 700 700 700
Total For Fund 815: 1,990 800 710
AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 30,220 27,170 30,410
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 500 500 500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 80 80 80
4401 - Interest Earnings 8,040 8,300 4,100
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 4,390
Total For Fund 838: 38,840 36,050 39,480
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 0 0 248,270
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 0 3,500
Total For Fund 841: 0 0 251,770
CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842)
4101 - Property Taxea-CY Secured 423,890 423,890 423,890
4401 - Interest Earnings 5,670 8,500 8,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 0 52,540
Total For Fund 842: 429,560 432,390 484,930
PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 1,642,750 1,692,440 1,727,030
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 43,030 25,000 25,000
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 8,610 6,500 6,500
4401 - Interest Earnings 50,300 50,300 25,000
4901 - Other Revenue 14,460 8,500 16,500
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 234,480 217,500 77,160
Total For Fund 848: 1,993,630 2,000,240 1,877,190
PD 85 RESERVE FUND (850)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4401 - Interest Earnh~gs 61,870 54,000 31,500
Total For Fund 850: 61,870 54,000 31,500
CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 166,250 166,250 143,280
4401 - Interest Earnings 4~ 120 1,000 500
Total For Fund 852: 170,370 167,250 143,780
AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854)
4101 - Proper0~ Taxes-CY Secured 484,830 520,670 552,180
4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 1,250 2,500 1,500
4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 380 380 250
4401 - Interest Earnings 12,880 16,000 11,250
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 26,410 0 0
Total For Fund 854: 525,750 539,550 565,180
AD 1999-1 REFUNDING RESERVE (855)
CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 0 532,390 532,390
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 21,290 1,750
Total For Fund 856: 0 553,680 534,140
CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860)
8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 0 1,136,900 436,200
Total For Fund 860: 0 1,136,900 436,200
CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE (861)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 22,000 22,000
Total For Fund 861: 0 22,000 22,000
CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862)
4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 69,370 85,450 83,920
4401 - Interest Earnings 2,610 750 500
Total For Fund 862: 71,980 86,200 84,420
CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE (863)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 2,500 2,500
Total For Fund 863: 0 2,500 2,500
CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 1,379,220 543,890
Total For Fund 864: 0 1,379,220 543,890
CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE (865)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 30,110 30,110
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 1,505~500 1,505,500
Total For Fund 865: 0 1,535,610 1,535,610
CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866)
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 271,000 104,480
Total For Fund 866: 0 271,000 104,480
CFI) 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE (867)
4401 - Interest Earnings 0 5,870 5,870
4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 0 293,500 293~500
Total For Fund 867: 0 299,370 299,370
Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 142,241,980 150,089,160 171,315,120
Cil~ of Rancho Cucamonga
Amende, d Fiscal Year 2003/04 Budget
EXPENDITURES
-59
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
GENERAL FUND (001)
001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 3,299,470 3,278,500 3,385,850
002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 102,000 218,030 243,400
101 CITY COUNCIL 102,050 90,850 92,070
102 CITY MANAGER 812,940 801,140 828,430
103 CITY CLERK 389,270 371,430 397,130
104 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 452,250 452,250 549,890
105 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 137,660 122,090 39,250
201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATION 377,270 377,170 386,470
204 BUSINESS LICENSES 212,740 209,380 202,580
205 CITY FACILITIES 1,456,260 1,485,860 1,506,860
206 FINANCE 674,670 604,650 636,430
207 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMfi 338,060 304,890 296,010
209 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTE~ 1,986,400 1,938,140 1,731,550
210 PERSONNEL 300,670 291,270 305,850
211 PURCHASING 321,220 340,890 344,870
212 RISK MANAGEMENT 184,600 167,220 154,780
213 TREASURY MANAGEMENT 4,890 3,640 3,650
302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 3,502,790 4,142,290 4,142,810
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 365,630 332,760 326,780
304 ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION MGT 839,880 825,700 787,050
305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 1,629,480 t,186,290 1,586,150
306 ENGINEERING - NPDES 481,900 492,720 487,940
307 ENGINEERING - PROJECT MGT 140,060 144,280 124,020
308 ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC MGT 222,860 220,710 233,170
312 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,949,460 1,903,950 1,996,280
313 INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. 563,140 624,310 635,940
314 PLANNING 1,815,050 1,749,700 2,007,200
315 PLANNING COMMISSION 17,140 9,570 9,650
316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 3,765,630 3,648,130 3,554,840
317 VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MAINT. 801,450 854,740 887,530
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIOI~ 2,382,220 2,337,520 2,269,310
420 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 6,760 2,730 2,130
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 14,321,720 15,280,650 14,851,960
TOTAL FOR GENERAL FUND: 43,957,590 44,813,450 45,007,830
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDIT~S
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003)
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 16,000 15,000 15,000
CCWI) REIMBURSEMENTS (006)
303 ENGINEERING - ADM]INISTRATION 55,240 54,750 55,280
CAL TRANS REIMBURSEMENTS (007)
316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 42,010 0 2,750
CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008)
316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 78,890 78,840 78,960
COMM DEV TECHNICAL SR¥CS FUND (016)
301 COMMUNITY DEV-ADMINISTRATION 529,800 398,400 719,580
CAPITAL RESERVE (025)
001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 3,420,920 1,013,590 9,651,260
BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073)
002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 200,000 200,000 500,000
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100)
202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN 605,560 631,750 654,890
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 246,820 247,180 0
AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105)
208 GRANT MANAGEMENT (AQMD) 152,750 189,240 225,050
BEAUTIFICATION (110)
316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 1,929,970 5,600,950 2,407,380
DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112)
303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 5,202,730 3,967,780 4,081,520
DRAINAGE-ETI~VANDA/SAN SEVAINE (114)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 37,000 11,170 511,170
ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 416,730 26,000 120,710
PARK DEVELOPMENT (120)
305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 5,417,010 6,839,510 5,249,260
TRANSPORTATION (124)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 12,803,690 12,480,460 5,596,930
LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 84,420 230,310
LMD gl GENERAL CITY (130)
303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 1,195,820 1,232,760 1,237,375
LMD #2 VICTORIA (131)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 2,512,260 2,573,470 2,598,180
LMD #3A HYSSOP (132)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 3,860 3,870 3,870
LMD 03B MEDIANS (133)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 822,410 948,850 962,250
LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134)
303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 1,564,750 1,602,950 1,642,040
LMD #5 TOT LOT (135)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 3,860 5,360 5,360
LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136)
· 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 430,130 433,850 434,110
LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137)
6/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
303 ENGINEERING ~ ADMINISTRATION 595,570 637,930 650,020
LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 22,650 31,340 31,620
LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139)
303 ENGINEERiNG-ADMINISTRATION 71,750 101,650 91,680
LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA (140)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 123,220 226,670 258,960
SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 584,480 594,040 594,040
SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL (152)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 290,410 292,230 333,930
SLD #3 VICTORIA (153)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 256,400 260,060 260,060
SLD #4 TERRA VISTA (154)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 129,760 149,030 149,030
SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 65,980 65,800 65,800
SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156)
303 ENGINEEPdNG - ADMINISTRATION 106,170 107,080 107,080
SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 24,510 30,070 30,070
SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION I3,540 26,610 26,610
GAS TAX 2105fPROPlll (170)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 1,352,940 805,110 927,540
GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 1,978,010 2,275,030 1,989,800
MEASURE "I" (176)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 4,119,620 3,218,410 6,955,460
SB 325 (180)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 0 1,020
AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 203,000 211,290 404,240
CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (184)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 100,000 100,000 100,000
FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186)
316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 0 51,880 52,210
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204)
314 PLANNING 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 4,650 2,650 2,650
PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 4,000 16,000 12,000
CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 42,620 38,660 65,750
USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTP-~ATION 57,360 42,270 69,620
REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV (230)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 0 0 20,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DMSION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund[Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 100,000 100,000 100,000
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 168,700 0 100,890
PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,504,710
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-I~PECIAL (237)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 10,000,000 10,000,000 9,335,000
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238)
303 ENGINEERING ~ ADMINISTRATION 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DRIER (239)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 50,000 50,000 854,740
MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244)
302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 0 0 87,780
RECREATION SERVICES (250)
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~' 1,866,410 2,033,860 1,996,350
YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252)
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO]? 385,820 309,960 306,230
SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258)
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~ 990 990 990
TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE (266)
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATIO~' 29,330 0 0
TARGET LITERACY GRANT (268)
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO]: 0 0 5,000
LIBRARY FUND (290)
601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 1,760,560 1,693,320 1,703,460
603 AFTER SCHOOL LEARNING PROGRAM 27,850 24,860 25,210
604 BOOKMOBILE SERVICES 99,920 96,150 98,470
605 LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 3,350 1,850 980
TOTAL FOR LIBRARY FUND: 1,891,680 1,816,180 1,828,120
CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298)
601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 53,490 44,980 47,810
FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308)
602 GRANT MANAGEMENT 26,520 25,720 20,640
PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310)
602 GRANT MANAGEMENT 0 0 800,000
COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL (352)
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 100,000 0 0
COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354)
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 284,450 0 283,490
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368)
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 0 71,250
COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT (369)
701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 0 160,000 160,000
OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT (370)
000 NOT APPLICABLE 0 0 8,580
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380)
501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 0 0 32,790
COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382)
105 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 0 0 15,470
OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GI~J~NT (384)
501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 0 0 27,000
AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL (600)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 2,760 166,440 0
AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 750,000 2,000 0
AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 41,880 21,520 80
AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 0 53,390 150
CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK (608)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 526,140 0 0
CFD 2001-01 (612)
303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 18,462,610 257,000 15,896,430
CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 0 11,333,850 14,201,850
CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER (615)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 0 5,700,000 0
SPORTS COMPLEX (700)
201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 1,088,790 1,052,400 1,087,130
401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~ 381,450 390,940 389,200
TOTAL FOR SPORTS COMPLEX: 1,470,240 1,443,340 1,476,330
MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705)
303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 0 0 8,584,850
EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712)
001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 477,550 314,900 436,380
COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714)
001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 356,200 211,770 212,750
AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND (800)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 258,970 0 0
AD 82-1R RESERVE FUND (801)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 158,760 0 0
CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 1,827,060 1,827,060 1,771,740
CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT (812)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 276,310 290,320 256,640
AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTI~CTS/CFDS 36,180 35,570 39,480
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 0 242,440
CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842)
203 ASSES SMENT DISTRIC~S/CFDS 415,090 421,070 484,930
PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848)
303 ENGINEERING- ADMINISTRATION 1,993,630 2,000,240 1,877,190
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003~04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Fund/Description Adopted Adopted Amended
Division/Description Budget Budget Budget
CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852)
303 ENGINEERING-ADMINISTRATION 126,240 191,810 124,400
AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 525,750 539,170 504,480
CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 530,330 490,640
CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 1,136,900 436,200
CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 69,370 85,450 83,200
CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 1,379,220 533,890
CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866)
203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 0 271,000 104,480
TOTAL FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 140,566,860 142,009,220 ! 65,570,955
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
GENERAL FUND (001)
001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL
5100 - Travel and Meetings 27,800 29,500 29,500
5105 - Mileage 25,800 25,800 25,800
5160 - Membership Dues 58,600 58,100 58,480
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 26,000 26,000 26,000
5300 - Contract Services 541,390 553,300 781,680
5314 - Red Light Fines Administration 0 363,000 339,000
5410 - Property Insurance 42,130 72,970 66,970
5411 - Other Insurance 1,440 1,440 2,690
5416 - General Liability Insurance 72,700 64,440 25,470
5505 - Booking Fees 350,000 420,000 527,730
5510 - Property Tax Admin. Fee 61,010 64,670 64,670
9281 - Transfer Out-Fire Fund 1,392,260 925,380 802,580
9283 - Transfer Out-CFD 88-1 23,530 0 0
9290 - Transfer Out-Library Fund 38,620 38,620 0
9700 - Transfer Out-Sports Complex 638,190 635,280 635,280
Total Division: 001 3,299,470 3,278,500 3,385,850
002 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONrNEL
5040 - PARS 0 161,530 161,530
5060 - Tuition Reimbursement 10,000 10,000 I 0,000
5061 - Management Development 65,000 0 0
5065 - Coffee Fund 2,000 2,000 2,000
5285 - Safety Gear & Equipment 25,000 25,000 25,000
5300 - Contract Services 0 19,500 44,870
Total Division: 002 102,000 218,030 243,400
101 - CITY COUNCIL
5000 - Regular Salaries 53,200 53,200 54,420
5030 - Fringe Benefits 19,680 19,680 19,680
5100 - Travel and Meetings 16,640 8,440 8,440
5105 - Mileage 1,500 1,500 1,500
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 3,700 3,700
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 8,030 4,330 4,330
5300 - Contract Services 3,000 0 0
Total Division: 101 102,050 90,850 92,070
102 - CITY MANAGER
5000 - Regular Salaries 548,690 551,390 565,020
5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000
5030 - Frmge Benefits 203,020 204,010 204,010
5100 - Travel and Meetings 14,350 5,700 7,200
5105 - Mileage 10,840 10,840 10,840
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 9,000 9,000
5152 - Computer Software 0 660 660
5160 - Membership Dues 4,540 4,540 4,850
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 2,500 2,500 2,500
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 13,000 4,000 4,310
5300 - Contract Services 15,000 7,500 19,040
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total Division: 102 812,940 801,140 828,430
103 - CITY CLERK
5000 - Regular Salaries 183,820 187,150 194,370
5005 - Overtime Salaries 750 750 900
5010 - Part Time Salaries 40,480 40,480 43,810
5030 - Fringe Benefits 71,650 72,890 72,890
5100 - Travel and Meetings 4,560 820 820
5102 - Training 0 1,300 1,300
5105 - Mileage 4,800 4,800 4,800
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 5,000 5,000
5152 - Computer Software 600 0 0
5160 - Membership Dues 1,330 1,330 1,330
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 54,880 49,880 64,880
5300 - Contract Services 26,400 7,030 7,030
Total Division: 103 389,270 371,430 397,130
104 - ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 500 500 500
5203 - O & M/Complex Maintenance 12,650 12,650 14,210
5300 - Contract Services 382,800 382,800 474,880
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 4,500 4,500 4,500
5400 - Telephone Utilities 3,500 3,500 3,500
5401 - Gas Utilities 3,800 3,800 2,300
5402 - Water Utilities 3,500 3,500 3,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 41,000 41,000 47,000
Total Division: 104 452,250 452,250 549,890
105 - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
5000 - Regular Salaries 64,120 60,470 0
5030 - Fringe Benefits 23,720 22,370 0
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,100 160 190
5102 - Training 0 1,150 1,150
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 2,100 1,000 1,000
5160 - Membership Dues 330 280 280
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 250 250 250
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 18,750 10,750 10,720
5205 - O & M/Reimbursable 6,000 5,000 5,000
5300 - Contract Services 2,290 2,660 2,660
5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 10,000 10,000 10,000
5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 8,000 8,000 8,000
Total Division: 105 137,660 122,090 39,250
201 - ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 261,730 265,490 274,890
5005 - Overtime Salaries 300 0 0
5030 - Fringe Benefits 96,840 98,230 98,230
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,300 550 550
5105 - Mileage 5,300 5,300 5,300
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 4,000 4,000
5160 - Membership Dues 500 500 500
5161 ~ Publications & Subscriptions 300 100 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5,000 0 0
5300 - Contract Services 5,000 3,000 3,000
Total Division: 201 377,270 377,170 386,470
204 - BUSINESS LICENSES
5000 - Regular Salaries 145,110 136,470 113,070
5010 - Part Time Salaries 5,000 15,540 32,840
5030 - Fringe Benefits 53,790 51,890 51,890
5100 - Travel and Meetings 800 100 100
5105 - Mileage 200 0 0
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 2,000 1,800
5160 - Membership Dues 100 100 100
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 7,500 3,000 2,500
5300 - Contract Services 240 280 280
Total Division: 204 212,740 209,380 202,580
205 - CITY FACILITIES
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 55,000 25,000
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 138,260 106,260 151,260
5300 - Contract Services 294,500 293,100 299,100
5400 - Telephone Utilities 330,000 334,000 334,000
5401 - Gas Utilities 46,000 50,000 50,000
5402 - Water Utilities 30,000 30,000 30,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 617,500 617,500 617,500
Total Division: 205 1,456,260 1,485,860 1,506,860
206 - FINANCE
5000 - Regular Salaries 444,000 403,520 429,740
5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,500 1,500 2,500
5010 - Part Time Salaries 14,490 16,690 18,620
5030 - Fringe Benefits 165,580 150,800 150,800
5100 - Travel and Meetings 6,380 1,600 1,600
5102 - Training 0 600 430
5105 - Mileage 4,900 4,900 4,910
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 8,000 7,500
5160 - Membership Dues 1,290 1,230 1,050
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 1,600 880 920
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 21,030 9,430 8,900
5300 - Contract Services 13,900 5,500 9,460
Total Division: 206 674,670 604,650 636,430
207 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
5000 - Regular Salaries 184,290 186,280 182,570
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 660
5030 - Fringe Benefits 68,190 68,920 68,920
5100 - Travel and Meetings 10,650 3,500 390
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 2,000 3,500 1,950
5152 ~ Computer Software 3,000 2,000 3,550
5160 - Membership Dues 340 330 190
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 100 0 0
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 12,000 17,000 15,000
5300 - Contract Services 57,490 23,360 22,780
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total Division: 207 338,060 304,890 296,010
209 - MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
5000 - Regular Salaries 702,320 679,100 690,960
5005 - Overtime Salaries 11,730 11,730 14,100
5030 - Fringe Benefits 259,860 251,270 251,270
5100 - Travel and Meetings 21,560 5,180 4,390
5102 - Training 0 5,220 5,220
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 7,500 7,500 6,500
5152 - Computer Software 87,970 102,220 99,720
5160 - Membership Dues 5,980 1,010 1,010
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 1,400 500 500
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 38,500 39,000 39,000
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 300,930 300,930 0
5300 - Contract Services 548,650 534,480 618,880
Total Division: 209 1,986,400 1,938,140 1,731,550
210 - PERSONNEL
5000 - Regular Salaries 161,770 166,800 165,730
5005 - Overtime Salaries 2,000 2,000 1,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 59,850 61,720 61,720
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,800 700 200
5105 - Mileage 100 100 100
5150 ~ Office Supplies & Equipment 0 3,000 2,000
5160 - Membership Dues 450 450 490
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 1,500 300 410
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 57,200 26,700 50,200
5300 - Contract Services 15,000 29,500 24,000
Total Division: 210 300,670 291,270 305,850
211 - PURCHASING
5000 - Regular Salaries 193,220 202,860 203,310
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 1,010
5010 - Part Time Salaries 39,210 39,210 39,970
5030 - Fringe Benefits 75,020 78,590 78,590
5100 - Travel and Meetings 4,500 0 0
5105 - Mileage 300 300 300
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 1,050 1,050
5160 - Membership Dues 520 520 520
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 8,450 7,200 7,200
5300 - Contract Services 0 11,160 12,920
Total Division: 211 321,220 340,890 344,870
212 - RISK MANAGEMENT
5000 ~ Regular Salaries 77,060 76,690 66,450
5030 - Fringe Benefits 28,510 28,380 28,380
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,100 0 0
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 800 600
5160 - Membership Dues 880 100 100
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 18,050 5,250 5,250
5300 - Contract Services 58,000 56,000 54,000
Total Division: 212 184,600 167,220 154,780
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
213 - TREASURY MANAGEMENT
5000 - Regular Salaries 610 610 620
5030 - Fringe Benefits 230 230 230
5100 - Travel and Meetings 1,600 550 550
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 200 200
5160 - Membership Dues 200 200 200
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 200 0 0
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 750 550 550
5300 - Contract Services 1,300 1,300 1,300
Total Division: 213 4,890 3,640 3,650
Total Division: 301 0 0 0
302 - BUILDING AND SAFETY
5000 - Regular Salaries 1,541,040 1,531,510 1,468,980
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 5,860
5030 - Fringe Benefits 570,180 566,660 566,660
5100 - Travel and Meetings 9,000 1,750 1,750
5102 - Training 0 500 300
5105 - Mileage 4,800 4,800 4,800
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 10,000 ! 3,000
5152 - Computer Software 0 1,220 1,220
5160 - Membership Dues 1,480 1,580 1,580
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 25,500 16,500 15,000
5300 - Contract Services 1,325,790 1,992,770 2,055,260
5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 25,000 15,000 8,400
Total Division: 302 3,502,790 4,142,290 4,142,810
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 247,380 225,030 218,980
5030 - Fringe Benefits 91,530 83,260 83,260
5100 - Travel and Meetings 5,360 3,110 3,110
5105 - Mileage 4,800 4,800 4,800
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 8,170 8,170
5152 - Computer Software 0 0 70
5160 - Membership Dues 990 990 990
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 11, t 70 3,000 3,000
5300 - Contract Services 4,400 4,400 4,400
Total Division: 303 365,630 332,760 326,780
304 - ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION MGT
5000 - Regular Salaries 405,900 396,130 322,640
5005 - Overtime Salaries 2,000 2,000 2,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 0 0 1,840
5030 - Fringe Benefits 150,180 146,570 146,570
5100 - Travel and Meetings 750 0 0
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 1,000 1,000
5160 - Membership Dues 50 0 0
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 3,000 2,000 2,000
5300 - Contract Services 278,000 78,000 111,000
5306 - Contract Serv/CFD 0 200,000 200,000
Total Division: 304 839,880 825,700 787,050
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
305 - ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT
5000 - Regular Salaries 609,460 532,950 579,980
5010 - Part Time Salaries 38,640 38,640 38,640
5030 - Fringe Benefits 226,270 197,430 197,430
5100 - Travel and Meetings 1,990 590 590
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 1,200 1,200
5160 - Membership Dues 820 1,020 1,020
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 2,300 1,100 35,100
5300 - Contract Services 650,000 363,360 580,000
5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 100,000 50,000 152,190
Total Division: 305 1,629,480 1,186,290 1,586,150
306 - ENGINEERING - NPDES
5000 - Regular Salaries 243,720 227,900 231,230
5005 - Overtime Salaries 15,000 15,000 15,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 90,180 84,320 84,320
5100 - Travel and Meetings 3,000 0 0
5102 - Training 0 23,000 2,890
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 40,000 20,000 38,000
5300 - Contract Services 90,000 122,500 116,500
Total Division: 306 481,900 492,720 487,940
307 - ENGINEERING - PROJECT MGT
5000 - Regular Salaries 97,310 97,470 77,480
5030 - Fringe Benefits 36,000 36,060 36,060
5100 - Travel and Meetings 100 0 0
5102 - Training 0 900 900
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 3,200 3,200
5160 - Membership Dues 450 450 180
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 6,200 1,200 1,200
5300 ~ Contract Services 0 5,000 5,000
Total Division: 307 140,060 144,280 124,020
308 - ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC MGT
5000 - Regular Salaries 154,380 153,650 166, I 10
5030 - Fringe Benefits 57,120 56,850 56,850
5100 - Travel and Meetings 920 170 170
5102 - Training 0 2,180 2,180
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 2,000 2,000
5160 - Membership Dues 4,260 4,860 4,860
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 200 200 200
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5,280 600 600
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 700 200 200
Total Division: 308 222,860 220,710 233,170
312 - FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
5000 - Regular Salaries 534,490 537,830 503,020
5005 - Overtime Salaries 95,000 95,000 100,640
5010 - Part Time Salaries 58,500 86,750 86,750
5030 - Fringe Benefits 203,030 206,810 206,810
5160 - Membership Dues 550 660 660
5204 - O & M/Facilities 237,440 237,000 242,300
7/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITL~,~ES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Obi ect Budget Budget Budget
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 2,500 2,500 2,500
5300 - Contract Services 84,800 0 13,850
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 733,150 737,400 837,600
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 2,150
Total Division: 312 1,949,460 1,903,950 1,996,280
313 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 289,680 264,450 272,700
5005 - Overtime Salaries 15,000 16,000 26,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 15,000 12,000 12,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 108,530 98,930 98,930
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,000 2,000 2,000
5105 - Mileage 960 960 960
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 2,000 2,000
5160 - Membership Dues 470 470 400
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 55,000 36,000 36,450
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 116,500 109,500
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 75,000 75,000 75,000
Total Division: 313 563,140 624,310 635,940
314 - PLANNING
5000 - Regular Salaries 1,053,000 1,028,580 973,560
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 320
5010 - Part Time Salaries 34,000 34,000 34,000
5030 ~ Fringe Benefits 390,290 381,250 381,250
5100 - Travel and Meetings 7,740 1,940 1,940
5105 - Mileage 5,370 5,370 5,370
5 ! 50 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 8,000 8,000
5160 - Membership Dues 1,410 1,410 1,440
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 810 810 810
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 26,300 21,300 23,850
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 1,640 1,640 1,640
5300 - Contract Services 244,490 215,400 199,950
5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 50,000 50,000 373,430
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 0 0 1,640
Total Division: 314 1,815,050 1,749,700 2,007,200
315 - PLANNING COMMISSION
5000 - Regular Salaries 6,040 6,040 6,120
5100 ~ Travel and Meetings 10,800 3,230 3,230
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 300 300 300
Total Division: 315 17,140 9,570 9,650
316 - STREET AND PARK MA1NT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 1,092,930 1,094,880 1,074,690
5005 - Overtime Salaries 95,000 95,000 124,910
5010 - Part Time Salaries 84,000 97,780 97,780
5030 - Fringe Benefits 411,940 413,910 413,910
5100 - Travel and Meetings 5,350 800 860
5102 - Training 0 15,600 15,600
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 7,000 7,000
5160 - Membership Dues 10,840 8,350 8,650
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5 ! 61 - Publications & Subscriptions 0 330 330
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 534,370 509,600 517,460
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 16,500 16,500 16,500
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 18,000 18,000 18,000
5300 - Contract Services 1,353,010 1,225,010 1,100,940
5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 22,770 23,480 29,280
5400 - Telephone Utilities 2,730 3,700 3,700
5402 - Water Utilities 104,400 104,400 104,400
5403 - Electric Utilities 13,790 13,790 13,790
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 7,040
Total Division: 316 3,765,630 3,648,130 3,554,840
317 - VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MA1NT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 231,940 235,910 238,530
5005 - Overtime Salaries 8,000 8,000 8,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 31,600 31,600 31,600
5030 - Fringe Benefits 88,660 90,130 90,130
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,050 0 0
5102 - Training 0 700 700
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 66,400 70,100 72,350
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 122,300 122,300 122,300
5255 - Gasoline 82,000 102,500 102,500
5256 - Diesel Fuel 87,000 112,000 112,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 6,500 6,500 6,500
5300 - Contract Services 75,000 75,000 102,920
Total Division: 317 801,450 854,740 887,530
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTKATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 1,150,380 1,158,230 1,108,480
5005 - Overtime Salaries 5,000 5,000 9,740
5010 - Part Time Salaries 352,030 372,010 354,920
5030 - Fringe Benefits 443,320 449,500 449,500
5100 - Travel and Meetings 15,560 3,800 3,800
5102 - Training 0 1,700 1,700
5105 - Mileage 5,770 6,310 6,310
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 19,050 21,050
5152 - Computer Software 0 0 80
5160 - Membership Dues 6,130 4,820 4,410
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 2,000 2,500 1,900
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 178,330 122,250 117,700
5300 - Contract Services 223,700 192,350 189,720
Total Division: 401 2,382,220 2,337,520 2,269,310
420 - PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
5100 - Travel and Meetings 5,410 1,350 750
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 350 0
5160 - Membership Dues 1,000 1,030 1,030
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 350 0 350
Total Division: 420 6,760 2,730 2,130
Total Division: 501 0 0 0
701 ~ POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5010 - Part Time Salaries 190,020 217,110 223,240
5030 - Fringe Benefits 3,800 4,340 4,340
5100 - Travel and Meetings 10,000 0 0
5101 - Travel, Meetings/D.A.R.E. 5,900 5,500 5,500
5102 - Training 0 10,400 10,400
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 32,000 32,000
5160 - Membership Dues 4,800 4,800 1,770
5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 600 600 600
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 117,600 81,100 70,550
5201 - O & M/Reserve Program 10,000 10,000 I0,000
5202 - O & M/D.A.R.E. Program 40,000 40,000 40,000
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 260,000 260,000 295,000
5255 - Gasoline 143,000 160,000 160,000
5282 - Veh & Equip MainffD.A.R.E. 5,000 5,000 5,000
5300 - Contract Services 13,347,150 14,254,920 13,926,950
5301 - Contract Services/D.A.R.E. 183,850 194,880 54,400
9368 - Transfer Out - LLEBG 2002 0 0 12,210
Total Division: 701 14,321,720 15,280,650 14,851,960
Total Division: 801 0 0 0
Total For Fund 001: 43,957,590 44,813,450 45,007,830
REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003)
701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 16,000 15,000 15,000
Total Division: 701 16,000 15,000 15,000
Total For Fund 003: 16,000 15,000 15,000
CCWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 27,550 27,190 27,720
5030 - Fringe Benefits 10,190 10,060 10,060
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5,500 5,500 5,500
5250 - Vehicle operations & Maint. 10,000 10,000 I0,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 1,000
5280 - Equip Opemfions & Maint 500 500 500
5300 - Contract Services 500 500 500
Total Division: 303 55,240 54,750 55,280
Total For Fund 006: 55,240 54,750 55,280
CAL TRANS REIMBURSEMENTS (007)
316 - STREET AND PARK MA1NT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 17,340 0 0
5030 - Fringe Benefits 6,420 0 0
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maim. 5,000 0 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 2,500 0 0
5255 - Gasoline 3,000 0 0
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 2,000 0 0
5300 - Contract Services 2,750 0 2,750
5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 3,000 0 0
Total Division: 316 42,010 0 2,750
Total For Fund 007: 42,010 0 2,750
CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008)
316 - STREET AND PARK MAINT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 6,230 6,200 6,320
5030 - Fringe Benefits 2,310 2,290 2,290
5300 - Contract Services 70,350 70,350 70,350
Total Division: 316 78,890 78,840 78,960
Total For Fund 008: 78,890 78,840 78,960
COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRYCS FUND (016)
301 - COMMUNITY DEV-ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 529,800 398,400 719,580
Total Division: 301 529,800 398,400 719,580
Total For Fund 016: 529,800 398,400 719,580
CAPITAL RESERVE (025)
001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL
5100 - Travel and Meetings 0 0 590
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 0 3,540
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 102,000 0 145,120
5255 - Gasoline 0 0 590
5256 - Diesel Fuel 0 0 4,520
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 0 0 320
5300 - Contract Services 199,000 174,000 326,890
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 57,000 46,000 36,640
5401 - Gas Utilities 0 3,600 0
5402 - Water Utilities 0 2,500 0
5403 - Electric Utilities 0 25,000 44,320
5416 - General Liability Insurance 169,620 210,990 69,020
5417 - General Liability Claims 250,000 381,000 472,000
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 263,300 105,500 51,240
5606 - Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixtures 0 15,000 23,400
5650 - Capital Project 2,330,000 0 3,700
9001 - Transfer Out-General Fund 0 0 49,510
9100 - Transfer Out-Assess Dist Admin 0 0 610
9250 - Transfer Out-Recreation Srvcs 0 0 4,960
9252 - Transfer Out-Youth Enrich Grot 0 0 320
9281 - Transfer Out-Fire Fund 0 0 52,690
75"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
9282 - Transfer Out-CFD 85-1 0 0 37,690
9283 - Transfer Out-CFD 88-1 0 0 16,120
9290 - Transfer Out-LibraE~ Fund 50,000 50,000 50,150
9620 - Transfer Out-Administration 0 0 300
9700 - Transfer Out-Sports Complex 0 0 2,170
9705 - Transfer Out-Municipal Utility 0 0 8,254,850
Total Division: 001 3,420,920 1,013,590 9,651,260
Total For Fund 025: 3,420,920 1,013,590 9,651,260
BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073)
002 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL
5000 - Regular Salaries 200,000 200,000 500,000
Total Division: 002 200,000 200,000 500,000
Total For Fund 073: 200,000 200,000 500,000
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100)
202 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN
5000 - Regular Salaries 340,380 348,730 363,100
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 610
5030 - Fringe Benefits 125,940 129,030 129,030
5100 - Travel and Meetings 7,000 0 0
5102 - Training 0 7,000 7,000
5105 - Mileage 400 400 400
5152 - Computer Software 0 0 460
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 89,750 103,150 86,700
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 3,670 3,670 3,670
5300 - Contract Services 38,420 39,770 61,220
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 0 2,700
Total Division: 202 605,560 631,750 654,890
Total For Fund 100: 605,560 631,750 654,890
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 1,500 0
5330 - Payment to Trustee 240,130 240,490 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 3,430 3,430 0
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 1,760 1,760 0
Total Division: 203 246,820 247,180 0
Total For Fund 101: 246,820 247,180 0
AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105)
208 - GRANT MANAGEMENT (AQMD)
5000 - Regular Salaries 15,370 16,260 16,570
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5030 - Fringe Benefits 5,420 6,020 6,020
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 95,760 95,760 131,260
5300 - Contract Services 1,200 1,200 1,200
5650 - Capital Project 35,000 70,000 70,000
Total Division: 208 152,750 189,240 225,050
Total For Fund 105: 152,750 189,240 225,050
BEAUTIFICATION (I 10)
316 - STREET AND PARK MAINT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 69,450 5,880 5,990
5030 - Fringe Benefits 25,700 2,180 2,180
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 80,000 0 6,500
5300 - Con~'act Services 25,800 492,640 658,160
5501 - Adr~n./General Overhead 38,020 56,550 56,550
5650 - Capital Project 1,536,000 5,043,700 1,678,000
9025 - Transfer Out-Capital Reserve 155,000 0 0
Total Division: 316 1,929,970 5,600,950 2,407,380
Total For Fund 110: 1,929,970 5,600,950 2,407,380
DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112)
303 ~ ENG/NEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 48,560 0 0
5010 - Part Time Salaries 0 0 20,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 17,970 0 400
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 87,750 98,160 98,160
5650 - Capital Project 5,048,450 3,869,620 3,962,960
Total Division: 303 5,202,730 3,967,780 4,081,520
Total For Fund 112: 5,202,730 3,967,780 4,081,520
DRAINAGE-ETIWANDAJSAN SEVAINiE (114)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 30,000 11,170 11,170
5650 - Capital Project 7,000 0 500,000
Total Division: 303 37,000 11,170 511,170
Total For Fund 114: 37,000 11,170 511,170
ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116)
303 - ENGINEEP,~NG - ADMINISTRATION
5501 - Admm./General Overhead 33,730 6,000 6,000
5650 - Capital Project 383,000 20,000 114,710
Total Division: 303 416,730 26,000 120,710
Total For Fund 116: 416,730 26,000 120,710
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
PARK DEVELOPMENT (120)
305 - ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT
5000 - Regular Salaries 60,730 67,150 68,440
5030 - Fringe Benefits 22,470 24,850 24,850
5100 - Travel and Meetings 1,000 1,000 1,000
5160 - Membership Dues 510 210 210
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 22,000 3,500 3,500
5300 - Contract Services 137,000 137,000 685,590
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 2,800 0 0
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 10,000 0 400
5650 - Capital Project 5,160,500 6,605,800 4,465,270
Total Division: 305 5,417,010 6,839,510 5,249,260
Total For Fund 120: 5,417,010 6,839,510 5,249,260
TRANSPORTATION (124)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 678,070 770,460 692,780
5010 - Part Time Salaries 7,410 7,410 7,410
5030 - Fringe Benefits 251,040 285,220 285,220
5152 - Computer Software 1,650 3,180 3,180
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 1,900 1,900 1,900
5300 - Contract Services 15,000 15,000 15,000
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 274,720 309,040 309,040
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 10,000 0 0
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 18,500 0 0
5650 - Capital Project 11,545,400 11,088,250 4,282,400
Total Division: 303 12,803,690 12,480,460 5,596,930
Total For Fund 124: 12,803,690 12,480,460 5,596,930
LOW.ER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 0 84,420 230,310
Total Division: 303 0 84,420 230,310
Total For Fund 126: 0 84,420 230,310
LMD gl GENERAL CITY (130)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 53,150 53,720 54,760
5010 - Part Time Salaries 8,000 16,400 31,740
5030 - Fringe Benefits 19,830 21,360 21,360
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 64,520 64,520 64,520
5204 - O & M/Facilities 13,000 16,000 16,000
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 3,000 3,000 3,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 1,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5280 - Equip Operations & Maim 4,800 4,800 5,740
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 640 640 640
5300 - Contract Services 632,450 647,790 632,450
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 13,000 19,000 21,135
5310 - Tree Maintenance 49,000 49,000 49,000
5400 - Telephone Utilities 2,630 3,500 4,000
5402 - Water Utilities 154,000 154,000 154,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 45,000 45,000 45,000
5500 - Assessment Administration 52,420 53,800 53,800
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 79,380 79,230 79,230
1,195,820 1,232,760 1,237,375
1,195,820 1,232,760 1,237,375
5000 - Regular Salaries 536,620 544,140 554,600
5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 54,600 84,600 90,740
5030 - Fringe Benefits 203,460 208,940 208,940
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 72,400 64,400 64,400
5204 - O & M/Facilities 8,000 8,000 8,000
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 10,000 I0,000 10,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 t,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 3,000 1,500 750
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 1,010 1,010 1,010
5300 - Contract Services 1,011,550 1,020,690 1,029,550
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 11,000 11,000 11,000
5310 - Tree Maintenance 46,000 46,000 46,000
5400 - Telephone Utilities 1,790 1,790 1,790
5402 - Water Utilities 323,000 323,000 323,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 33,000 50,000 50,000
5500 - Assessment Administration 27,570 28,480 28,480
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 167,260 167,920 167,920
2,512,260 2,573,470 2,598,180
2,512,260 2,573,470 2,598,180
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 430 440 440
5300 - Contract Services 2,130 2,130 2,130
5402 - Water Utilities 630 630 630
5403 - Electric Utilities 210 210 210
5500 - Assessment Administration 40 40 40
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 420 420 420
3,860 3,870 3,870
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 132: 3,860 3,870 3,870
LMD #3B MEDIANS (133)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 129,820 144,240 147,020
5005 - Overtime Salaries 2,500 2,500 2,500
5010 - Part Time Salaries 12,000 20,000 20,000
5030 - Frmge Benefits 49,110 55,170 55,170
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 52,550 52,550 53,430
5204 - O & M/Facilities 1,000 1,000 1,000
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maim. 1,500 1,500 1,500
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 2,000 2,000 2,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 12,000 12,000 12,000
5300 - Contract Services 309,180 324,480 332,790
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 40,000 124,800 127,370
5310 - Tree Maintenance 35,300 35,300 35,300
5400 - Telephone Utilities 3,360 3,360 3,360
5402 - Water Utilities 70,000 70,000 70,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 40,000 35,000 35,000
5500 - Assessment Administration 3,330 3,250 3,250
5501 - Admm./General Overhead 58,760 60,560 60,560
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 1,140 0
Total Division: 303 822,410 948,850 962,250
Total For Fund 133: 822,410 948,850 962,250
LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 580,170 593,490 604,910
5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 11,000 14,450 20,590
5030 - Fringe Benefits 215,650 220,890 220,890
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 59,840 59,270 59,270
5204 - O & M/Facilities 14,620 14,000 14,000
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 6,000 6,000 6,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 1,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Mahit 3,750 3,750 3,750
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 150 150 150
5300 - Contract Services 344,350 363,790 357,650
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 16,000 16,000 16,000
5310 - Tree Maintenance 13,200 13,200 13,200
5400 - Telephone Utilities 2,940 2,940 2,940
5402 - Water Utilities 131,000 131,000 160,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 25,410 25,410 25,410
5500 - Assessment Administration 17,880 17,930 17,930
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 109,340 111,230 111,230
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 4,000 0 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 7,450 7,450 6,120
Total Division: 303 1,564,750 1,602,950 1,642,040
Total For Fund 134: 1,564,750 1,602,950 1,642,040
LMD #5 TOT LOT (135)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 300 300 300
5204 - O & M/Facilities 0 500 500
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 70 70 70
5300 - Contract Services 1,800 1,800 1,800
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 0 1,000 1,000
5402 - Water Utilities 540 540 540
5403 - Eleclxic Utilities 260 260 260
5500 - Assessment Administration 240 240 240
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 650 650 650
Total Division: 303 3,860 5,360 5,360
Total For Fund 135: 3,860 5,360 5,360
LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 14,150 13,630 13,890
5010 - Part Time Salaries 0 0 6,140
5030 - Fringe Benefits 5,240 5,040 5,040
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 13,190 13,030 13,030
5250 - Vehicle operations & Maint. 1,000 1,000 1,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 100 100 100
5300 - Contract Services 251,630 257,770 251,630
5310 - Tree Maintenance 25,200 25,200 25,200
5402 - Water Utilities 81,800 81,800 81,800
5403 - Eleclxic Utilities 5,200 5,200 5,200
5500 - Assessment Administration 6,940 6,940 6,940
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 25,680 24,140 24,140
Total Division: 303 430,130 433,850 434,110
Total For Fund 136: 430,130 433,850 434,110
LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 105,450 I08,470 110,560
5010 - Part Time Salaries 7,500 15,900 22,040
5030 - Fringe Benefits 39,170 41,560 41,560
5200 - operations & Maintenance 40,170 39,370 39,370
5204 - O & M/Facilities 4,000 6,000 6,000
5250 - Vehicle operations & Maint. 2,500 2,500 2,500
5252 - Emergency 8,: Routine Veh Rent 500 500 500
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 500 500 500
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5300 - Contract Services 264,030 270,170 264,030
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5,000 9,000 9,000
5310 - Tree Maintenance 13,100 13,100 13,100
5400 - Telephone Utilities 3,150 3,150 3,150
5402 - Water Utilities 49,000 65,000 75,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 17,100 17,100 17,100
5500 - Assessment Administration 7,930 8,570 8,570
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 36,470 37,040 37,040
Total Division: 303 595,570 637,930 650,020
Total For Fund 137: 595,570 637,930 650,020
LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 2,080 2,080 2,080
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 800 800 800
5300 - Contract Services 12,780 21,560 21,560
5400 - Telephone Utilities 530 530 530
5402 - Water Utilities 3,230 3,230 3,230
5403 - Electric Utilities 420 420 700
5500 - Assessment Administration 830 830 830
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 1,980 1,890 1,890
Total Division: 303 22,650 31,340 31,620
Total For Fund 138: 22,650 31,340 31,620
LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5010 - Part Time Salaries 1,000 9,050 6,940
5030 - Fringe Benefits 20 810 810
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 7,150 7,150 2,150
5204 - O & M/Facilities 2,000 2,000 2,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 200 200 200
5300 - Contract Services 24,750 32,140 20,000
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 4,000 4,000 4,000
5310 - Tree Maintenance 2,050 2,050 2,050
5402 - Water Utilities 5,440 5,440 5,440
5403 - Electric Utilities 780 780 780
5500 - Assessment Administration 2,270 3,250 3,250
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 11,440 34,780 34,780
5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 10,650 0 9,280
Total Division: 303 71,750 101,650 91,680
Total For Fund 139: 71,750 101,650 91,680
LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA (140)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 1,000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5010 - Pan Time Salaries 6,000 14,000 23,200
5030 - Fringe Benefits 120 1,260 1,260
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 19,000 11,650 11,650
5204 - O & M/Facilities 4,000 4,000 4,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 1,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 2,000 1,000 1,000
5300 - Contract Services 6,000 103,080 93,880
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 9,000 9,000 9,000
5310 - Tree Maintenance 2,250 2,250 2,250
5402 - Water Utilities 37,000 37,000 37,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 11,000 11,000 21,000
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 3,280 3,280
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 27,150 27,150
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 3,000
5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 24,850 0 19,290
Total Division: 303 123,220 226,670 258,960
Total For Fund 140: 123,220 226,670 258,960
SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 500 500 500
5403 - Electric Utilities 428,500 428,500 428,500
5500 - Assessment Administration 112,360 119,660 119,660
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 43,120 45,380 45,380
Total Division: 303 584,480 594,040 594,040
Total For Fund 151: 584,480 594,040 594,040
SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL (152)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5403 - Electric Utilities 238,300 238,300 280,000
5500 - Assessment Administration 31,750 33,120 33,120
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 20,360 20,810 20,810
Total Division: 303 290,410 292,230 333,930
Total For Fund 152: 290,410 292,230 333,930
SLD #3 VICTORIA (153)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 2,350 5,000 5,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 207,370 207,370 207,370
5500 - Assessment Administration 27,360 28,250 28,250
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 19,320 19,440 19,440
Total Division: 303 256,400 260,060 260,060
Total For Fund 153: 256,400 260,060 260,060
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
SLD #4 TERRA VISTA (154)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 0 880 880
5300 - Contract Services 22,000 38,640 38,640
5403 - Electric Utilities 77,920 77,920 77,920
5500 - Assessment Administration 17,860 17,930 17,930
5501 ~ Admin./General Overhead 11,980 13,660 13,660
Total Division: 303 129,760 149,030 149,030
Total For Fund 154: 129,760 149,030 149,030
SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5,000 5,000 5,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 50,270 50,270 50,270
5500 - Assessment Administration 6,940 6,940 6,940
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 3,770 3,590 3,590
Total Division: 303 65,980 65,800 65,800
Total For Fund 155: 65,980 65,800 65,800
SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 800 800 800
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 0 400 400
5300 - Contract Services 36,300 36,300 36,300
5403 - Electric Utilities 57,810 57,810 57,810
5500 - Assessment Administration 2,940 3,010 3,010
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 8,320 8,760 8,760
Total Division: 303 106,170 107,080 107,080
Total For Fund 156: 106,170 107,080 107,080
SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5403 - Electric Utilities 15,080 15,080 15,080
5500 - Assessment Administration 5,910 9,840 9,840
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 3,520 5,150 5,150
Total Division: 303 24,510 30,070 30,070
Total For Fund 157: 24,510 30,070 30,070
SLD 88 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5403 - Electric Utilities 3,770 3,770 3,770
5500 - Assessment Administration 2,710 3,690 3,690
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 7,060 19,150 19,150
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total Division: 303 i3,540 26,610 26,610
Total For Fund 158: 13,540 26,610 26,610
GAS TAX 2105/PROPlll (170)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 234,550 232,740 237,220
5005 ~ Overtime Salaries 0 0 100
5030 - Fringe Benefits 86,780 86,110 86,110
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 0 2,450
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maim. 610 610 610
5300 - Contract Services 524,000 478,650 583,500
5650 - Capital Project 507,000 7,000 17,550
Total Division: 303 1,352,940 805,110 927,540
Total For Fund 170: 1,352,940 805,1 I0 927,540
GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 780,060 767,980 782,750
5005 - Overtime Salaries 10,000 10,000 10,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 57,800 61,700 61,700
5030 - Fringe Benefits 293,820 289,700 289,700
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 17,540 17,540 17,540
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 7,500 7,500 7,500
5251 - Depreciation - Vehicles 111,410 111,410 111,410
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 2,000 2,000 2,000
5281 - Depreciation - Equipment 17,010 17,010 17,010
5403 ~ Electric Utilities 680,870 990,190 690,190
Total Division: 303 1,978,010 2,275,030 1,989,800
Total For Fund 172: 1,978,010 2,275,030 1,989,800
MEASURE "I" (176)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salahes 101,180 109,320 111,420
5030 - Fringe Benefits 37,440 40,450 40,450
5300 - Contract Services 0 105,640 350,000
5650 - Capital Project 3,981,000 2,963,000 6,453,590
Total Division: 303 4,119,620 3,218,410 6,955,460
Total For Fund 176: 4,119,620 3,218,410 6,955,460
SB 325 (180)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 0 0 1,020
Total Division: 303 0 0 1,020
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTI34ATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 180: 0 0 1,020
AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 203,000 211,290 404,240
Total Division: 303 203,000 211,290 404,240
Total For Fund 182: 203,000 211,290 404,240
CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRANI (184)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total Division: 303 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total For Fund 184: 100,000 100,000 100,000
FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186)
316 - STREET AND PARK MAi%IT.
5000 - Regular Salaries 0 17,250 17,580
5030 - Fringe Benefits 0 6,380 6,380
5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 0 5,000 5,000
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 0 2,500 2,500
5255 - Gasoline 0 3,000 3,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 0 2,000 2,000
5300 - Contract Services 0 12,750 12,750
5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 0 3,000 3,000
Total Division: 316 0 51,880 52,210
Total For Fund 186: 0 51,880 52,210
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204)
314 - PLANNING
5000 - Regular Salaries 267,550 276,060 281,370
5030 - Fringe Benefits 98,990 102,140 102,140
5650 - Capital Project 1,175,750 1,639,570 1,677,570
Total Division: 314 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
Total For Fund 204: 1,542,290 2,017,770 2,061,080
TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 2,650 2,650 2,650
5650 - Capital Project 2,000 0 0
Total Division: 303 4,650 2,650 2,650
Total For Fund 208: 4,650 2,650 2,650
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 4,000 16,000 12,000
Total Division: 303 4,000 16,000 12,000
Total For Fund 214: 4,000 16,000 12,000
CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5010 - Part Time Salaries 0 0 3,200
5030 - Fringe Benefits 0 0 290
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 22,620 21,060 22,560
5300 - Contract Services 20,000 17,600 23,400
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 16,300
Total Division: 303 42,620 38,660 65,750
Total For Fund 225: 42,620 38,660 65,750
USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5005 - Overtime Salaries 10,000 10,000 10,000
5100 - Travel and Meetings 2,000 2,000 2,000
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 37,360 30,270 57,620
5300 - Contract Services 8,000 0 0
Total Division: 303 57,360 42,270 69,620
Total For Fund 226: 57,360 42,270 69,620
REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV (230)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 0 0 20,000
Total Division: 303 0 0 20,000
Total For Fund 230: 0 0 20,000
SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total Division: 303 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total For Fund 232: 100,000 100,000 100,000
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234)
303 ~ ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 168,700 0 100,890
Total Division: 303 168,700 0 100,890
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITI~ES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 234: 168,700 0 100,890
PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,504,710
Total Division: 303 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,504,710
Total For Fund 236: 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,504,710
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL (237)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 10,000,000 10,000,000 9,335,000
Total Division: 303 10,000,000 10,000,000 9,335,000
Total For Fund 237: 10,000,000 10,000,000 9,335,000
PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
Total Division: 303 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
Total For Fund 238: 1,000,000 1,000,000 974,250
FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DRIER (239)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 50,000 50,000 854,740
Total Division: 303 50,000 50,000 854,740
Total For Fund 239: 50,000 50,000 854,740
MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Total Division: 303 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Total For Fund 240: 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244)
302 - BUILDING AND SAFETY
5152 - Computer Software 0 0 2,990
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 0 4,990
5285 - Safety Gear & Equipment 0 0 4,400
5300 - Con~cact Services 0 0 5,460
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 8,460
5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 0 45,260
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 0 16,220
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total Division: 302 0 0 87,780
Total For Fund 244: 0 0 87,780
RECREATION SERVICES (250)
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 239,520 242,290 246,950
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 1,930
5010 - Part Time Salaries 700,810 773,610 778,720
5030 - Fringe Benefits 124,420 127,500 127,500
5105 - Mileage 950 650 650
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 0 2,000
5152 - Computer Software 0 0 3,500
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 290,780 272,920 270,710
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 770 770 770
5300 - Contract Services 509,160 616,120 563,620
Total Division: 401 1,866,410 2,033,860 1,996,350
Total For Fund 250: 1,866,410 2,033,860 1,996,350
YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252)
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATION
5000 - Regular SaIaries 50,720 53,120 46,200
5010 - Part Time Salaries 159,830 171,900 144,030
5030 - Fringe Benefits 27,600 29,570 27,270
5100 - Travel and Meetings 5,300 3,300 2,300
5105 - Mileage 0 0 300
5152 - Computer Software 1,500 0 120
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 48,700 32,600 19,980
5300 - Contract Services 53,670 19,470 66,030
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 3,000 0 0
5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 26,000 0 0
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 4,500 0 0
5606 - Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixtures 5,000 0 0
Total Division: 401 385,820 309,960 306,230
Total For Fund 252: 385,820 309,960 306,230
SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258)
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 990 990 990
Total Division: 401 990 990 990
Total For Fund 258: 990 990 990
TEEN AFTER SCHOOL PROG GRANT (260)
Total Division: 401 0 0 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE (266)
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5010 - Part Time Salaries 8,560 0 0
5030 - Fringe Benefits 770 0 0
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 20,000 0 0
Total Division: 401 29,330 0 0
Total For Fund 266: 29,330 0 0
TARGET LITERACY GRANT (268)
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 0 5,000
Total Division: 401 0 0 5,000
Total For Fund 268: 0 0 5,000
LIBRARY FUND (290)
601 - LIBRARY-ADM1NISTP,~TION
5000 - Regular Salaries 637,590 627,490 639,560
5010 - Part Time Salaries 348,200 298,780 305,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 247,460 242,740 242,740
5100 - Travel and Meetings 4,000 2,000 2,000
5105 - Mileage 5,800 5,800 5,800
5160 - Membership Dues 2,350 2,350 2,350
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 206,000 190,000 190,000
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 20,270 20,270 20,270
5300 - Contract Services 142,000 162,000 164,000
5400 - Telephone Utilities 18,000 18,000 15,000
5402 - Water Utilities 3,000 3,000 3,000
5403 - Electric Utilities 77,000 72,000 77,000
9298 - Transfer Out-CA Literacy Cmpgn 35,020 35,020 16,100
9308 - Transfer Out-Families for Lit. 13,870 13,870 20,640
Total Division: 601 1,760,560 1,693,320 1,703,460
603 - AFTER SCHOOL LEARNING PROGRAM
5000 - Regular Salaries 17,010 17,820 18,170
5010 - Part Time Salaries 3,280 0 0
5030 - Fringe Benefits 6,360 6,590 6,590
5100 - Travel and Meetings 500 250 250
5200 - Operatiom & Maintenance 700 200 200
Total Division: 603 27,850 24,860 25,210
604 - BOOKMOBILE SERVICES
5000 - Regular Salaries 41,540 45,930 48,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 20,660 23,000 23,000
5030 - Fringe Benefits 15,780 17,450 17,450
5100 - Travel and Meetings 500 0 0
5105 - Mileage 100 100 100
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 6,000 2,250 2,500
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003~04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 2,420 2,420 2,420
5400 - Telephone Utilities 10,000 5,000 5,000
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 2,920 0 0
Total Division: 604 99,920 96,150 98,470
605 - LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
5100 - Travel and Meetings 3,000 1,500 630
5160 - Membership Dues 350 350 350
Total Division: 605 3,350 1,850 980
Total For Fund 290: 1,891,680 1,816,180 1,828,120
CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298)
601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 26,860 26,730 27,240
5010 - Part Time Salaries 10,000 5,000 2,500
5030 - Fringe Benefits 10,140 9,990 9,990
5100 - Travel and Meetings 1,600 500 500
5105 - Mileage 380 150 200
5160 - Membership Dues 180 180 220
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 1,400 500 5,230
5300 - Contract Services 2,930 1,930 1,930
Total Division: 601 53,490 44,980 47,810
Total For Fund 298: 53,490 44,980 47,810
FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308)
602 - GRANT MANAGEMENT
5000 - Regular Salaries 8,950 8,910 9,080
5010 - Part Time Salaries 13,000 13,000 8,000
5030 - Frmge Benefits 3,570 3,560 3,560
5100 - Travel and Meetings 500 0 0
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 500 250 0
Total Division: 602 26,520 25,720 20,640
Total For Fund 308: 26,520 25,720 20,640
PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310)
602 - GRANT MANAGEMENT
5650 - Capital Project 0 0 800,000
Total Division: 602 0 0 800,000
Total For Fund 310: 0 0 800,000
COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL (352)
701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 100,000 0 0
Total Division: 701 100,000 0 0
¢/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 352: 100,000 0 0
COWS PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354)
701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 284,450 0 283,490
Total Division: 701 284,450 0 283,490
Total For Fund 354: 284,450 0 283,490
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 {365)
Total Division: 70I 0 0 0
CA LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (366)
Total Division: 702 0 0 0
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368)
701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 0 0 55,000
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 0 16,250
Total Division: 701 0 0 71,250
Total For Fund 368: 0 0 71,250
COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT 069)
701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 0 160,000 160,000
Total Division: 701 0 160,000 160,000
Total For Fund 369: 0 160,000 160,000
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380)
501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION
5102 - Training 0 0 3,630
5290 - Specialized Tools & Equipment 0 0 13,060
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipmem 0 0 16,100
Total Division: 501 0 0 32,790
Total For Fund 380: 0 0 32,790
COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382)
105 - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
5290 - Specialized Tools & Equipment 0 0 970
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 14,500
Total Division: 105 0 0 15,470
Total For Fund 382: 0 0 15,470
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT (384)
501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 27,000
Total Division: 501 0 0 27,000
Total For Fund 384: 0 0 27,000
AD 82-1 6TIt ST INDUSTRIAL (600)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 0 166,440 0
9800 - Transfer Out-AD 82-1R Redemp. 2,760 0 0
Total Division: 303 2,760 166,440 0
Total For Fund 600: 2,760 166,440 0
AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5650 - Capital Project 750,000 2,000 0
Total Division: 203 750,000 2,000 0
Total For Fund 602: 750,000 2,000 0
AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 37,000 21,440 0
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 4,880 80 80
Total Division: 303 41,880 21,520 80
Total For Fund 604: 41,880 21,520 80
AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 0 53,240 0
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 150 150
Total Division: 303 0 53,390 150
Total For Fund 606: 0 53,390 150
CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK (608)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 0 0
5330 - Payment to Trustee 480,350 0 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 17,720 0 0
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 26,570 0 0
Total Division: 203 526,140 0 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total For Fund 608: 526,140 0 0
CFD 2001-01 (612)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTKATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 55,000 7,000 15,590
5300 - Contract Services 2,010,000 250,000 1,774,270
5650 - Capital Project 16,397,610 0 14,106,570
Total Division: 303 18,462,610 257,000 15,896,430
Total For Fund 612: 18,462,610 257,000 15,896,430
CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 2,000 10,000
5300 - Contract Services 0 3,321,000 3,681,000
5650 - Capital Project 0 7,430,000 9,930,000
5710 - Bond Issuance Costs 0 580,850 580,850
Total Division: 303 0 11,333,850 14,201,850
Total For Fund 614: 0 11,333,850 14,201,850
CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER (615)
303 - ENG1NEEKING - ADMINISTRATION
5650 - Capital Project 0 5,700,000 0
Total Division: 303 0 5,700,000 0
Total For Fund 615: 0 5,700,000 0
SPORTS COMPLEX (700)
201 - ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 188,070 187,440 191,050
5005 - Overtime Salaries 33,000 33,000 44,000
5010 - Part Time Salaries 139,290 139,290 139,290
5030 - Fringe Benefits 76,630 81,890 81,890
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 28,000 0 0
5203 - O & M/Complex Maintenance 38,500 38,500 38,500
5204 - O & M/Facilities 40,600 50,600 52,600
5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 3,000 3,000 3,000
5300 - Contract Services 45,000 45,000 45,000
5302 - Contract Serv/Complex Maint. 6,800 6,800 6,800
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 133,800 119,300 137,420
5400 - Telephone Utilities 7,800 3,000 3,000
5401 - Gas Utilities 8,720 9,600 9,600
5402 - Water Utilities 66,730 66,730 66,730
5403 - Electric Utilities 268,250 268,250 268,250
5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvrnnt 4,600 0 0
q¥
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
Total Division: 201 1,088,790 1,052,400 1,087,130
401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 78,110 83,520 85,130
5005 - Overtime Salaries 0 0 1,620
5010 - Part Time Salaries 98,030 100,740 101,430
5030 - Fringe Benefits 33,720 35,950 35,960
5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 200 200
5206 - O & M/Recreation Programs 57,820 55,460 49,580
5305 - Contract Serv/Recreation Prgs 113,770 115,070 115,280
Total Division: 401 381,450 390,940 389,200
Total For Fund 700: 1,470,240 1,443,340 1,476,330
MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 0 0 51,800
5030 - Fringe Benefits 0 0 19,170
5209 - O & M/Electric Utility 0 0 146,600
5309 - Contract Srvc/Elcctric Utility 0 0 701,820
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 0 957,230
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 0 4,520
5650 - Capital Project 0 0 6,703,710
Total Division: 303 0 0 8,584,850
Total For Fund 705: 0 0 8,584,850
EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712)
001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL
5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 75,050 118,900 47,280
5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 402,500 196,000 389,100
Total Division: 001 477,550 314,900 436,380
Total For Fund 712: 477,550 314,900 436,380
COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714)
001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL
5152 - Computer Software 101,500 35,000 35,000
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 1,200 1,200
5300 - Contract Services 91,680 148,520 145,630
5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 163,020 27,050 30,920
Total Division: 001 356,200 211,770 212,750
Total For Fund 714: 356,200 211,770 212,750
AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND (800)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTR/CTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 256,210 0 0
95-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
9600 - Transfer Out-AD 82-1R 2,760 0 0
Total Division: 203 258,970 0 0
Total For Fund 800: 258,970 0 0
AD 82-1R RESERVE FUND (801)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
9800 ~ Transfer Out-AD 82-1R Redemp. 158,760 0 0
Total Division: 203 158,760 0 0
Total For Fund 801: 158,760 0 0
CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 1,500 4,300
5330 - Payment to Trustee 1,680,000 1,680,000 830
5500 - Assessment Administration 36,390 36,390 36,390
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 109,170 109,170 109,170
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 131,050
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 1,490,000
Total Division: 203 1,827,060 1,827,060 1,771,740
Total For Fund 805: 1,827,060 1,827,060 1,771,740
AD 84-2 REDEMPTION FIJND (807)
Total Division: 203 0 0 0
AD 86-2 REDEMPTION FUND (810)
Total Division: 203 0 0 0
CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/ItIGHLND DEBT (812)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 1,500 3,450
5330 - Payment to Trustee 225,170 238,480 830
5500 - Assessment Administration 15,630 15,630 15,630
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 34,010 34,010 34,010
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 122,020
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 80,000
9815 - Transfer Out-AD 88-2 Police 0 700 700
Total Division: 203 276,310 290,320 256,640
Total For Fund 812: 276,310 290,320 256,640
CFD 88-2 POLICE (815)
Total Division: 203 0 0 0
AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5000 - Regular Salaries 0 21,450 21,860
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITL~,ES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5010 - Part Time Salaries 0 0 3,500
5030 - Fringe Benefits 0 7,940 7,940
5300 - Contract Services 30,000 0 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 2,060 2,060 2,060
5501 - Adm/n./General Overhead 4,120 4,120 4,120
Total Division: 203 36,180 35,570 39,480
Total For Fund 838: 36,180 35,570 39,480
AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 0 0 1,500
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 0 3,430
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 0 1,760
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 160,750
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 75,000
Total Division: 203 0 0 242,440
Total For Fund 841: 0 0 242,440
CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 1,500 1,500
5330 - Payment to Trustee 378,020 384,000 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 13,340 13,340 13,340
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 22,230 22,230 22,230
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 211,400
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 120,000
9812 - Transfer out to Fund 812 0 0 116,460
Total Division: 203 415,090 421,070 484,930
Total For Fund 842: 415,090 421,070 484,930
PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5000 - Regular Salaries 335,540 334,330 340,760
5005 - Overtime Salaries 2,500 2,500 2,500
5010 - Part Time Salaries 10,800 11,400 17,540
5030 - Fringe Benefits 124,370 124,730 124,730
5200 - Operations & Maintenance 108,450 108,450 111,000
5204 - O & M/Facilities 15,000 15,000 15,000
5250 ~ Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5,000 5,000 5,000
5252 ~ Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 4,000 4,000 4,000
5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 11,000 11,000 11,000
5300 - Contract Services 17,800 23,940 17,800
5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 12,000 12,000 13,630
5310 - Tree Maintenance 12,000 12,000 12,000
5330 - Payment to Trustee 670,000 670,000 670,000
?7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5400 - Telephone Utilities 4,200 5,500 5,500
5402 - Water Utilities 108,150 108,150 108,150
5403 - Electxic Utilities 128,810 128,810 128,810
5500 - Assessment Administration 138,420 139,720 139,720
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 135,590 133,710 133,710
5650 - Capital Project 150,000 150,000 16,340
Total Division: 303 1,993,630 2,000,240 1,877,190
Total For Fund 848: 1,993,630 2,000,240 1,877,190
CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852)
303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION
5300 - Contract Services 1,500 69,000 3,500
5330 - Payment to Trustee 110,920 108,990 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 8,290 8,290 8,290
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5,530 5,530 5,530
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 77,080
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 30,000
Total Division: 303 126,240 191,810 124,400
Total For Fund 852: 126,240 191,810 124,400
AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5330 - Payment to Trustee 510,580 524,000 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 10,000 10,000 10,000
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5,170 5,170 5,170
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 159,310
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 330,000
Total Division: 203 525,750 539,170 504,480
Total For Fund 854: 525,750 539,170 504,480
CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5300 - Contract Services 0 1,500 2,800
5330 - Payment to Trustee 0 484,540 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 17,720 17,720
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 26,570 26,570
5700 - Interest Expense 0 0 363,550
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 0 80,000
Total Division: 203 0 530,330 490,640
Total For Fund 856: 0 530,330 490,640
CFD 2001-01 SER/ES A REDMPTION (860)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTR/CTS/CFDS
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 AMENDED BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
2002/03 Fiscal Year 2003/04
Adopted Adopted Amended
Object Budget Budget Budget
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 30,000 30,000
5501 - Admin./Geneml Overhead 0 20,000 20,000
5700 - Interest Expense 0 866,900 386,200
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 220,000 0
Total Division: 203 0 1,136,900 436,200
Total For Fund 860: 0 1,136,900 436,200
CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5330 - Payment to Trustee 65,450 0 0
5500 - Assessment Administration 2,610 7,000 7,000
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 1,310 3,000 3,000
5700 - Interest Expense 0 65,450 63,200
5701 - Principal Repayments 0 10,000 10,000
Total Division: 203 69,370 85,450 83,200
Total Division: 303 0 0 0
Total For Fund 862: 69,370 85,450 83,200
CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 25,000 25,000
5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 15,000 15,000
5700 - Interest Expense 0 1,339,220 493,890
Total Division: 203 0 1,379,220 533,890
Total For Fund 864: 0 1,379,220 533,890
CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866)
203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS
5500 - Assessment Administration 0 7,000 7,000
5501 - Admin./Geneml Overhead 0 3,000 3,000
5700 - Interest Expense 0 261,000 94,480
Total Division: 203 0 271,000 104,480
Total For Fund 866: 0 271,000 104,480
Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 140,566,860 142,009,220 165,562,375
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Stafl Report
DAIfi: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT': APPROVAL OF THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF
RECONSTRUCTION SERVICES WITHOUT COMPETITIVE
BIDDING, PURSUANT TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 04-150
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the emergency
procurement of reconstruction services without competitive bidding to recover from a
fire that happened at City Hall.
Backqround
On Saturday, April 24, 2004, a small fire broke out in an area under construction
inside City Hall. Fortunately, the fire sprinklers were able to contain the fire but
extensive damage was caused by the smoke and by the water from the sprinkler.
Because this was an unanticipated emergency that could have adverse affects on
public health and safety and because of the short time frame available, it would be
impossible to use the competitive bidding process. The Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code has provisions allowing for the suspension of the competitive
bidding process in certain circumstances. The emergency surrounding the City Hall
fire and subsequent water damage qualify under the suspension provisions of the
Municipal Code. At its regular meeting on May 5, 2004, the City Council approved
Resolution 04-150. This Resolution authorized the procurement of services related
to the response and recovery from the fire and related damage without competitive
bidding. The resolution also required updates to the City Council until the
emergency work is completed.
The first phase of the recovery has been completed. All areas damaged by fire,
smoke or water have been removed or dried. The .building has been certified by an
industrial hygienist as free of moisture that would contribute to mold growth and free
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF RECONSTRUCTION SERVICES
WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING, PURSUANT CITY COUNCIl.. RESOLUTION 04-150
of contaminants in the air systems. The next phase of the recovery has now
begun. This phase is the actual reconstruction of damaged areas. This work
involves the replacement of drywall, ceiling tiles, base coving and carpet as well as a
thorough cleaning and repainting of the affected areas.
In consultation with the City's insurance adjuster and the insurance adjuster for the
contractor doing the seismic retrofit work at City Hall, it was decided that the City
contract with Belfor USA Group, Inc. to perform all work necessary for
reconstruction. This is the same company that did the initial fire recovery work for
the City. Belfor USA Group is a company that specializes in fire and flood recovery
on large scale projects and buildings and was recommended by the City's insurance
adjuster.
Belfor's contract was for time and materials with an estimated amount not to exceed
$210,000. Since starting this phase of the work, Belfor has worked with shifts
around the clock to complete all the reconstruction activities. Because of these
efforts, the reconstruction is expected to be substantially complete by Monday, May
17, 2004.
All of the work being performed is done in close consultation with the City's
insurance adjuster, McLarens Young. The costs for the recovery and reconstruction
will be paid by our insurance and will subsequently be subrogated to the insurance
company of the general contractor responsible for the fire, DRP National, Inc. The
City's insurance deductible is $5,000 and we will seek that amount from DRP
National's insurance.
It is anticipated that when the reconstruction work is completed, the emergency
response to the recovery from the City Hall Fire will be done. Staff will issue a final
report at that time and no further professional services will need to be procured
without competitive bidding. Because these actions were necessary to insure the
immediate' and long-term health of our employees and the public as well as the
safety of the building, it is recommended that the City Council approve and ratify the
procurement of reconstruction services per the provisions of City Council Resolution
04-150.
R~/~ectfully submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 04-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RATIFYING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITHOUT COMPETITIVE
BIDDING
A. RECITALS.
(i) Chapter 3.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and California
Public Contract Code § 20162, generally require contracts for the
procurement of goods and/or services in excess of the City's established
purchasing limits, and contracts for public works in excess of the statutory
amount, respectively, to be competitively bid.
, (ii) Said Chapter, and Public Contract Code § 20168, permit such bidding to be
dispensed with when the City Councit determines by passing a resolution
by four-fifths vote that the public interest and necessity demand the
immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health or property.
(iii) On April 24, 2004, a fire occurred within the City's City Hall, causing severe
smoke and water damage, and creating an immediate risk of injury or harm
to employees and other persons inside City Hall. Due to these emergency
circumstances, and in order to more fully protect the public health, safety
and welfare, the City Manager authorized and did immediately procure the
services of an environmental hygienist and a company or companies
specializing in repair and remediation of smoke and water damage,
demolition and reconstruction activities, without competitive bidding.
(iv) It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in
adopting this Resolution to ratify and approve the emergency expenditure
of funds, the procurement of professional services, and emergency
reconstruction, without competitive bidding, as described in Recital (iii),
above, and to approve, in advance, any such further emergency
expenditures, without competitive bidding, necessitated by said fire, as
deemed necessary by the City Manager, in order to safeguard life, health,
and property, and thereby more fully protect the safety of the public and
employees of the City.
(v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds and resolves as follows:
1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and
correct.
Resolution No. 04-150
Page 3 of 3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May 2004.
AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Howdyshell, Kurth, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None ~.--,
ATTEST:
De ra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting
of said City Council held on the 5th day of May 2004.
Executed this 6th day of May 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adam~y~MC~ City Clerk
i
TH E C I T Y OF
l~AN C H 0 C IICAH 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO' Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED
TO REMOVE TEMPORARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS UNDER COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF 1-15,
NORTH OF FOOTHILL, AND SOUTH OF CHURCH.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute a quit claim
deed on behalf of the City and Community Facilities Districts to remove temporary
grading and access easements to construct public improvements.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
During the formation of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01, the City
Council and Community Facilities District were party to the recordation of grading and
access easements to allow public improvements to begin construction along the Day
Creek Boulevard and Church Street borders of the Victoria Gardens site. The
easements were recorded against the property, but were intended to be temporary and
replaced with permanent right-of-way easements once final maps were recorded for the
property.
The City Council has previously approved the final map for Victoria Gardens, and will
take action on this agenda to consider the final map for the Route 66 portion of the
property, which is south of Victoria Gardens Lane and north of Foothill. With approval
of both maps, the final easements will be recorded and the temporary easements are no
longer needed. Once the Quit Claim Deed is recorded, the temporary easements will
be cleared from the property.
Respectfully submitted,
Redevelopment Director
-2-
T H E CITY OF
]~AN Cfl 0 C U CAH ONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Shonda Bello, Planning Aide
SUBJECT: HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to designate six residences located at
9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard as a Historic Point of
Interest and allow relocation or demolition of all or some of the subject structures
- APN: 0208-141-06, 08, 09, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files: Development District
Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development
Review DRC2003-01036, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139.
RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends approval of
Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105, subject to the conditions in the attached
resolution as final action.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: George and Henry Klusman constructed most of the six
residences circa 1932. The houses were constructed to be used by field workers in the
Cucamonga area. The Klusmans were well known in the Cucamonga area and were
responsible for building many important structures including reservoirs, houses, and the Virginia
Dare Winery.
These residences currently occupy the land proposed for a condominium complex. These
homes would be demolished or removed in order to establish a new 156-unit condominium
complex. The project site is located in a neighborhood characterized by older single-family
homes interspersed with a variety of commemial and office uses along Foothill Boulevard. The
loose and bifurcated arrangement of the residences occupying the site are not bound by a
common link and would not fall into the category of a community or historic district.
CONCLUSION: The subject sites and structures qualify for Point of Interest designation based
upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including historical
and cultural significance. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the
Facts for Finding section of the Historic Preservation Commission staff report dated
April 14, 2004. The requested Point of Interest designation relates to these sites only. Several
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00105 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 19, 2004
Page 2
of the residences have been altered since construction, and most have deteriorated
significantly.
The house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard appears to be the most significant structure (Craftsman
bungalow design) from an architectural and relocation feasibility standpoint and therefore an
appropriate mitigation (attempt to re-locate off site) is provided.
Although the structures have not retained their historical context, the history of the Klusmans
involvement in the area warrants designation as a Historic Point of Interest. In addition, staff
has included conditions to assure that the historical information concerning the structures is
contained on the site for informational purposes.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SB/Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 2004
Exhibit "B" - Minutes of the April 14, 2004 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
Resolution Approving Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105
T H E CITY OF
l~A N C H 0 C U CAH 0 N C,A
Staff Report
DATE: April 14, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to designate six residences located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474,
9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard as a Historic Point of Interest and to allow relocation or
demolition of ail or some of the subject structures - APN: 0208-141-06, 08, 09, 11, 13, and
14. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract
Map SUBTT16567, Development Review DRC2003-01036,,and Tree Removal Permit
DRC2004-00139.
BACKGROUND:
A. Historical Siqnificance: Most of the six residences were constructed by George and Henry Klusman
circa 1932. The houses were constructed to be used by field workers in the Cucamonga area. The
Klusmans were well known in the Cucamonga area and were responsible for building many
important structures including reservoirs, houses, and the Virginia Dare Winery.
B. Site Characteristics: Each house sits on approximately 0.14 acre. The land use zoning of the sites
and the surrounding area is designated Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 3), Mixed Use.
ANALYSIS
General: The Klusmans built the houses in the early to mid 1930s. The six homes were built to be used
by local fieldworkers. These residences currently occupy the land proposed for a condominium complex.
These homes would be demolished or removed in order to establish a new 156-unit condominium
complex. The project site is located in a neighborhood characterized by older single-family homes
interspersed with a variety of commercial and office uses along Foothill Boulevard. The loose and
bifurcated arrangement of the residences occupying the site are not bound by a common link and would
not fall into the category of a community or historic district. Exhibit "A" contains the Primary, Building,
Structure and Object Records for the contributing buildings on the properties.
Historic Point of interest Desiqnation: The subject sites and structures qualify for Point of Interest
designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including
historical and cultural significance. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the
Facts for Findings section. The requested point of interest designation relates to these sites only.
Several of the residences have been altered since construction, and most have deteriorated significantly.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
DRC2004-00105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 14, 2004
Page 2
The House at 9494 Foothill Boulevard appears to be the most significant structure (Craftsman bungalow
design) from an architectural and relocation feasibility standpoint and therefore an appropriate mitigation
(attempt to relocate off site) is provided.
Although the structures have not retained their historical context, the history of the Klusmans
involvement in the development of the area warrants designation as a Historic Point of Interest. In
addition, staff has included conditions to assure that the historical information concerning the
structures is contained on the site for informational purposes.
A. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31
exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
FACTS FOR FINDING:
A. Historical and Cultural Siqnificance:
Findinq 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a historic period, type,
style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The properties were the location of housing for several families of fieldworkers, who
were important to Cucamonga's agricultural era.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or
a local personality.
Fact/s: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area, primarily for their aptitude in
construction.
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once
common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The properties were used by several families involved with local agriculture, which is no
longer a common occurrence in the Cucamonga area.
CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Point of Interest designation was advertised as a public hearing in
the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property
owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend
approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105, subject to the conditions in the
attached resolution, to be forwarded to the City Council for final action.
City Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Primary and Building, Structure, and Object Records
Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation
DRC2004-00105
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewar Date
Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or # Laing Hemes' DuP. Dili_(]enc~. for Parcels Along Foothill Boul~.vard
PI. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS T.5' Quad Guasti, CADate 1981 T1S;R7~_ ;__'l/4of l/4ofSec3;B.M.
c. Address 9424 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give mom than one for la~ge and/or linear resources) Zone 10 '__ mEJ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN: 0208-141-14
*P3a. Description: The property consists of a one story single-family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival
style; it is of wood frame construction and has a fiat roof. There are protruding architectural details at
each of the comers of the roof. Basically rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing extending from the
asymmetrical fa§ade. Thera is also a wood frame addition with wood siding at the back elevation. The
exterior walls and chimney are clad with original stucco. A dropped secondary porch roof at the front
entrance is covered with terra cotta tiles. The primary elevation has a decorative detail of three mission
terra cotta tiles embedded in a triangular shape. The wood windows appear to be original with a six pane
casement window as well as two adjacent double hung sash windows on the fa(~ade. There ara mostly
double hung sash windows on the other elevations. The front door has been replaced. The building is in
fair condition. Its integrity is good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family pmperb/
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] District []Element of District []Other (Isolates,
etc.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (view,
'"......~._.~-"~" -"' ~ ~" ', date, accession #)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Historic [] Prehistoric
[] Both
aDDroximatelv 1932
*P7. Owner and Address: Huani:I
Family Trust c/o Arthur Huang
~ 17121 Los Robles Circle
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
Lori Shdver- Planninq Aide
10500 Civic Center Drive
RRn~hn ~,llP.;~mnn_~ ~A 91730
*Pg. Date Recorded: ~
PI0. Survey Type: Section 106 Compliance Project Review
*Pll. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter"none".) Survev bv Christeen Taniouchi. ADdl 3. 2003
*Attachments: []NONE []Location Map []Continuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
I'-IArchaeological Record E]District Record ~--ILinear Feature Record [~]Milling Station Record []Rock Art Record
I'-IArtifact Record []Photograph Record []Other (List):
*Required information//0
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI #
*NRHP Status Code 6Z
Page ;~ of ? *Resource Name or # Lain.q Homes' Due Dilii:lence for Parce s Aon.q Footh Bou evard
__ B1. Historic Name: nor~e
B2. Common Name: none
__ B3. Original Use: Single family resider]ce
__ B4. Present Use: sinqle family residence or qreenhouse
__ *B5. Architectural Style: Spani.~h Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The building was constructed circa 1932, There is a one story wood addition at the back of the
property.
*B7. Moved? No ~F~3Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*BS, Related Features:
The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage.
B9a. Architect:unknown b. Builder: unknown
*B10, Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga
Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family dwelling Applicable Criteria: N/A
The building was constructed circa 1932, according to tax assessment records for San Bemardino County. This, along
with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman
Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry, with H.H. Thomas. They were constructed for
the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bemardino
County. The houses were described as "five room modern homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the
building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property
until it was transferred to Laurabel Gardiner in 1946. The Klusman family figured prominently in the eady development
of Rancho Cucamonga. Although still a single family residence in appearance, the building is listed as a "greenhouse"
under the current Use Code by the San Bemardino tax assessors.
The property has a wood frame single story addition in the back. Otherwise there appear to be no significant changes
to the building exterior, and Jt is in overall fair condition. It is in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits
similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that were built at a similar time by the
same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not otherwise associated with a recognized
architect or a significant type, perior, or method of construction. Based on this review, the property is not eligible for
listing in the Nationa~ Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National Register historic
district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing
as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the city's agricultural industry.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: {List attributes and codes) HP2- Single familv dwellir~q
*B12. References: 4/3/2003 studv bv Christeen Tanigu(;hi Sketch Map with north arrow required.
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planninq Aide
*Date of Evaluation: February 3, 2004
(This space reserved for official comments)
III
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 8Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or # Lain_~ Homes' DuP. Dili_oence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard
Pl. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County San Bernardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti, CADate 1981 T1S;R7~_ ; 1/4of l/4ofSec3;B.M.
c. Address 9434 Foothi!l Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 ' mE/ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as apprepdate)
APN: 0208-141-13
*P3a. Description:
This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame
construction and has a fiat roof. There are protruding architectural details at each of the comers of the roof. Basically rectangular
in plan, there is a shallow wing extending from the asymmetrical facade; the wing shares a continuous terra cotta file roof with the
front porch. The extedor walls are clad with odginal stucco. The pdmary elevation has a decorative detail of three mission terra
cotta tiles embedded in a triangular shape. The wood windows appear to be odginal with a non-original (but eady addition) awning
above the center windows; most of the others are double hung sash windows, The front door and screen door appear to be
original, The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attribufas and codes) HP2- Single family property
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] Disthct []Element of District ['-]Other (Isolates,
etc.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #) February 19, 2004
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Historic [] Prehistoric
[] Both
am3mximatelv 1932
*PT. Owner and Address: Rancho
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonoa. CA 91730
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
Lori Shriver- Plannina Aide
10500 Civic Center Drive
~n~hc~ ~..IlC..qmnn?~ ~A
*P9. Date Recorded: 02/03/2004
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review
*PI'I. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, orenter"none-.) SurvevbvChristeenTaniauchi. Aoril 3. 2003
*Attachments: [~NONE []Location Map [Continuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
[]Archaeological Record []District Record []Linear Feature Record J-]Milling Station Record []Rock Art Record
r-lArtifact Record []Photograph Record []Other (List):
DPR 523a (1/95) *Required information//~_..~
State of California -The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI Ct
*NRHP Status Code 6Z
Page 2 of 3 *Resource Name or Ct Laing Homes' Due Diligence for Parcels Alon,q Foothill Boulevard
BI. Historic Name: none
B2. Common Name: none
__ B3. Original Use: Single famil.v residence
__ B4. Present Use: sinqle family residence
__ *B5. Architectural Style: Sp~ni.~h Colonial Reviwl
*B6, Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The property has an original concrete driveway but does not appear to have a garage.
*B7. Moved? No [~]Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage.
B9a. Architect:unknown b. Builder: unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: Cucamonga
Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family dwelling Applicable Criteria: N/A
The building was constructed circa 1932, according to tax assessment records for San Bernardino County.
This, along with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between
Archibald and Hellman Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry, with H.H.
Thomas. They were constructed for the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of
life within Cucamonga and San Bemardino County. The houses were described as "five room modern
homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the building's construction, George A. Klusman
was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property until it was transferred to Steve
and Lillie DeAmbrogio in 1942. The Klusman family figured prominently in the early development of
Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence. (continued)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Sinale familv dwellinq
*B12. References: 4/3/2003 study by Christeen Taniouchi Sketch Map with north arrow required.
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planninq Aide
*Date of Evaluation: February 3, 2004
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET HRI #
Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder)
Record by: Lori Shriver, Plannin,q Aide Date: February 3, 2004
[] Continuation [] Update
Primary_ Record for 9434 Foothill Boulevard. Rancho Cucamonga. CA !continued)
There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is in the
Spanish Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same
block that were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not
otherwise associated with a recognized architect or a significant type, perior, or method of construction. Based on
this review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a
contributor to a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity
and appears to be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally
important family and the city's agricultural industry.
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
State of California -The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or# Laing Homes' Due Diliaence for Parcels Alono Foothill Boulewrd
Pl. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County San Bemardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T 1S.; R7~_ ; '1/4 of 1/4 of Sec 3; B.M.
c. Address 9456 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 -- mE/ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN: 0208-141-11
*P3a. Description:
This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood flame
construction and has a fiat roof. There are terra cotta tiles along the cornice. Neady rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing
extending from the asymmethca] fac..ade with an extended terra cotta tile roof; the adjacent porch has a dropped roof also clad with
identical tiles. The extedor walls and chimney are clad with odginal stucco. The wood windows appear to be original, although
there is one newer metal frame window on the west elevation. The front door and screen door appear to be original. The building
is in fair condJfies. Its integrity is good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family properb/
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] District []Element of Distdct []Other
PSb, Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #) February 19,2004
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Historic [] Prehistoric
[] Both
aoDroximately 1932
*P7. Owner and Address:
Yuzo Hayashi
P.O. Box 578
Alta Loma, CA 91701
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
Lori Shriver- Plannina Aide
10500 Civic Center Driy~
R.~nchn ~Hc~mnn_n~ CA ~117R0
*P9. Date Recorded: 02/03/2004
*PI0. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review
*Pll. Report Citation: (Cite survey mport and other sources, or enter "none".) Survev bvChristeen Taniauchi. ADtil 3. 2003
*Attachments: []NONE ~]Location Map []Continuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
[]Amhaeological Record []District Record /--~Linear Feature Record E]Milling Station Record ~'-lRock Art Record
['-IArtifact Record []Photograph Record I--1Other (List):
DPR 523a (1/95) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
· DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI #
*NRHP Status Code 6Z
Page 2 of 2. *Resource Name or # Lain.q Homes' Due Dili,qence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard
__ B1. Historic Name: nor~
B2. Common Name: n~n~
__ B3. Original Use: single family residence
__ B4. Present Use: single family residence
__ *BS. Architectural Style: Sganish Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The building was constructed circa 1932 and retains its original plot size.
*B7. Moved? No []Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage.
B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architectur~ Area: Cucamonga
Period of Significance: c. 1932 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: N/A
The building was constructed circa 1932, according to tax assessment records for San Bemardino County. This, along
with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman
Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry, with H.H. Thomas. They were constructed for
the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bemardino
County. The houses were described as "five mom modem homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the
building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property
until it was transferred to Mary C. Klusman in 1953. The Klusman family figured prominenfiy in the eady development
of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence.
There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish
Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that
were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated
with a recognized architect or a significant type, ped0d, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally
significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, pedod, or method of construction. Based on this
review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to
a potential National Register histodc district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to
be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic disb'ict for its association with a locally important family and the
city's agricultural industry.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Sinale familv residence
*B12. References: 4/3/2003 studv bv Christeen Taniouchi
B13. Remarks: Sketch Map with north arrow required.
*B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Plannin.q Aide
('This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523J (1/95) //~
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 8Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or # Laino Homes' Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard
Pl. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County San Bemardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T 1S; RT~_ ; 1/4 of 114 of Sec 3; B.M.
c. Address 9474 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 __ mE/ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN: 0208-141-09
*P3a. Description:
This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame
construction and has a fiat roof. Nearly rectangular in plan, there is a wing with gable roof extending from the fagade; at the
junction between the wing and the rest of the house the main roof is slanted to accommodate the gable. The ectedor walls are clad
with odginal stucco. The wood windows appear to be odginal with three adjacent six pane windows prominent on the fagade.
There are mostly double hung sash windows on the other elevations. One window on the fagade was replaced with those that
lowered. The front screen door has been replaced with a recent metal security door. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is
good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family property
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] District []Element of Distdct I-lather (Isolates,
etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Histodc [] Prehistoric
[] Both
aeeroximatelv 1929
*P7. Owner and Address: Huang
Family Trust c/o Arthur Huang
17121 Los Rabies Cirde
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
Lori Shdver- Planning Aide
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rant. ho ~nr-~mnngn ~A ~q1730
*Pg. Date Recorded: 02/12/2004
*PI0. Survey Type: (Describe) Section l06 Compliance Project Review
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Survev bv Chrfsteen Taniauchi. Aadl 3.2003
*Attachments: F-INaNE I-]Location Map r-rContinuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
(-]Archaeological Record []District Record []Linear Feature Record E~Milling Station Record I'-IRock Art Record
J~Artifact Record []Photograph Record []Other (List):
//?
DPR 523a (1195) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI #
*NRHP Status Code 6Z
Page 2 of Z *Resource Name or # Laing Homes' Due Diliqence for Pamels AIon,q Foothill Boulevard
B1. Historic Name: none
B2. Common Name: none
__ B3. Original Use: single family residence
__ B4. Present Use: sinqle family residence
__ *BS. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The building was constructed circa 1929 and retains its original plot size.
*B7. Moved? No ~3Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*BB. Related Features:
The property has an original concrete driveway and what appears to be an original garage.
B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: ResidentialArchitecture Area: Cucamonoa
Period of Significance: c, 1929 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: N/A
The building was constructed circa 1929, according to tax assessment records for San Bemardino County. This, along
with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Archibald and Hellman
Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman bmthem George and Henry, with H.H. Thomas. They were constructed for
the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bemardino
County. The houses were described as "five room modem homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the
building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records, He owned the property
until it was transferred to Ralph and Vivian Santolucito in 1941. The Klusrnan family figured pmminentty in the eady
development of Rancho Cucarnonga. The building retains its original use as a single family residence.
There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish
Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that
were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated
with a recognized architect or a significant type, pedod, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally
significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this
review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to
a potential National Register histodc district. It does, however, retain its original architectural integrity and appears to
be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important family and the
city's agricultural industry.
Bll. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Sinole familv orooerty
*B12. References: 4/3/2003 studv bv Christeen Tani(~uchi
B13. Remarks: Sketch Map with north arrow required.
*B'I4. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Plannin.q Aide
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523J (1/95) //~
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 1 of 2 *ResourceNameor#LainaHnmes'DueDili_~P. ncef~rParcelsAl~ngFo~thillBoulevard
Pt. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County San Bemardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS T.5' Quad Guasti, CADate 1981 TI..~.S;R7~_ ; 114of ll4ofSec3;B.M.
c. Address 9482 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for la~ge and/or linear resources) Zone 10 '__ mE/ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN: 0208-141-08
*P3a. Description:
This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Spanish Colonial Revival style; it is of wood frame
construction and has a fiat roof. There are terra cotta tiles along the cornice, which has a modified step design. Basically
rectangular in plan, there is a shallow wing with dropped gable terra cotta file roof extending from the asymmetrical fac~ade
cylindrical terra cotfa files embedded into the wall above the porch as a decorative detail. There is an eady wood addiUon at the
back of the house, with a half gable roof. There is also a wood structure with wood doors that lead into the basement. The
windows on the fac..ade have been replaced with those that are metal frame; this includes a prominent picture window. The odginal
wood frame windows on the other elevations appear to be intact. The front door does not appear to be original, and the screen
door has been replaced by a metal security gate. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List atfributes and codes) HP2-Singlefamilyprapert¥
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] Distdct [~Element of Distdct I-]Other (Isolates,
etc.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Histodc [] Prehistoric
[] Both
aDoroximately 1929
*PT. Owner and Address: Rancho
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonoa. CA 91730
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
Lori Shriver- Planninq Aide
10500 Civic Center Drive
R~nnhn ~llc~mnn_n~ ~A ~173{')
*P9. Date Recorded:
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Section 106 Compliance Project Review
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Survev bv Chdsteen Taniauchi. Aodl 3. 2003
*Attachments: []NONE []Location Map []Continuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
r-]Amhaeological Record []District Record []Linear Feature Record []Milling Station Record i--]Rock Art Record
[]Artifact Record ['-]Photograph Record []Other (List):
DPR 523a (1/95) .Required informatl (!~
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI #
*NRHP Status Code 6Z
Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or # Laing Homes' Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard
BI. Historic Name: none
B2. Common Name: none
__ B3. Original Use: sinqle family residence
__ B4. Present Use: single family residence
__ *B5. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The building was constructed circa 1929 and retains its original plot size.
*B7. Moved? No [] Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
The property has what appears to be an original garage with an early masonry addition at its east side.
B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown
*BI0. Significance: Theme: Residential Amhitecture Area: Cucamonqa
Period of Significance: c. 1929 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: N/A
The building was constructed circa 1929, according to tax assessment records for San Bemardino County. This, along
with the other Spanish Colonial Revival style houses on the same side of the block between Amhibald and Hellman
Avenues, was constructed by the Klusman brothers George and Henry, with H.H. Thomas. They were constructed for
the workers in the agricultural industry as that was the common way of life within Cucamonga and San Bernardino
County. The houses were described as "five reom modem homes" in The Cucamonga Daily Report. At the time of the
building's construction, George A. Klusman was listed as the owner in tax assessment records. He owned the property
until it was transferred to Henry Klusman in 1936. In 1946, the property came under the ownership of Julio and Monica
Danzo. By 1947, the property was owned by John and Rosaria Camesi. The Klusman family figured prominently in
the eady development of Rancho Cucamonga. The building retains its odginal use as a single family residence.
There appear to be no significant changes to the building exterior, and it is in overall fair condition. It is the Spanish
Colonial Revival style, and exhibits similarities in appearance to other single family residences on the same block that
were built at a similar time by the same developers (the Klusman brothers). However, the property is not associated
with a recognized architect or a significant type, pedod, or method of construction. The property is not architecturally
significant and does not embody characteristics of a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this
review, the property is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Histodc Places individually or as a centdbufar to
a potential National Register historic district. It does, however, retain its original amhitactural integrity and appears to
be potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district for its association with a locally important famiJy and the
city's agricultural industry.
Bll. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Sinale family property
*B12. References: 4/3/2003 study bv Christeen Taniouchi
Sketch Map with north arrow required.
B13. Remarks:
*B14.Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or # Lain_a Homes' Due Dilioence fnr Parcels Alon_a Foothill Boulevard
PI. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: [] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted
*a. County San Bemardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti, CA Date 1981 T 1S; R7~/._ ; 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec 3; B.M,
c. Address 9494 Foothill Boulevard City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 ' __ mE/ mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
APN: 0208-141-06
*P3a. Description:
This five room property consists of a one story single family residence in the Craftsman style with cross-gable roof; there are a total
of seven gables located on all but the west side of the house. The roof is of asphalt shingles, a non-original matedal used. There
are three columns with battered sides at each of the outer comers of the L-shaped porch with concrete stairs leading up to it. The
building has exposed roof beams and rafter tails with wide, unenclosed eave overhangs. The chimey is red bdck. The wood
windows with multiple panes are typical of the Craftsman style. Those at and near the rear of the house tend to be double-hung
sash windows. The front and rear doors have replacement metal secudty doors. The building is in fair condition. Its integrity is
good.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Single family property
*P4. Resource Present: [] Building [] Structure [] Object [] Site [] District [-]Element of Distdct r-Iother (Isolates,
etc.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (view,
date, accession #) 2/19/2004
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: [] Histodc [] Prehistoric
[] Both
aonroximatelv 1927
*P7. Owner and Address: Huang
Family Trust c/o Arthur Huang
17121 LOS Robles Circle
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
*P8. Recorded by:
(Name, affiliation, and address)
_ori Shdver- Plannina Aide
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rnnr:.hn ~l~nnmnn_nn CA 917~0
*P9. Date Recorded: ~
*P10. Survev Tvr~e: Section 106
Compliance Project Review
*Pll. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Survey bv Chdsteen Taniauchi. April 3. 2003
*Attachments: I'-INONE E]Location Map I--]Continuation Sheet []Building Structure, and Object Record
I'-JArchaeological Record []District Record [~Linear Feature Record E]Milling Station Record []Rock Art Record
I'-~Artifact Record I--IPhotograph Record [-IOther (List):
DPR 523a (1/95) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD HRI #
*NRHP Status Code 67
Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or # Laing Homes' Due Diligence for Pamels Along Foothill Boulevard
BI. Historic Name: none
B2. Common Name: none
__ B3. Original Use: sinqle family residence
__ EN. Present Use: single family residence
__ *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman Bunqalow
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
The building was constructed circa 1927 and retains its original plot size.
*B7. Moved? No [] Yes [] Unknown [] Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:
The property has a masonry garage that was built at an unknown date, but is not original.
Bga. Amhitect: unknown b. Builder: unknown
*BI0. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: Cucamon,qa
Period of Significance: c. 1929 Property Type: single family residence Applicable Criteria: N/A
Henry W. Klusman was the owner of the property when tax assessment for the builiding began in 1927. He had
obtained the property from his brother George Klusman in 1926 when it was assessed for land only. Henry Klusman
was the owner until at least 1953. The Klusman family figured preminentiy in the early development of Rancho
Cucamonga.
This Craftsman style house appears to have retained most of its significant architectural features and is in good
condition. However, the property does not contribute to a cohesive neighborhood and is not otherwise associated with
a recognized amhitect or a significant type, period, or method of construction. Based on this review, the property is not
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places individually or as a contributor to a potential National
Register historic district. It does, however, appear to be potentially eligible for local listing for its association with a
locally important family and for being an intact example of its architectural style.
Bll. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2- Sinale familv oroDertv
*B'I2. References: 4/3/2003 study by Christeen Taniguchi Sketch Map with north arrow required.
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Lori Shriver, Planninq Aide
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST
DRC2004-00105, DESIGNATING SIX HOUSES BUILT BY THE
KLUSMANS, AS A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT
9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, AND 9494 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208~141-06, 08,
09, 11, 13, AND 14.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Histodc Point of Interest as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is
referred to as "the application."
2. On Apdl 14, 2004, the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. .Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.85 acre of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, and 9494 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above-
referenced public hearing on Apdl 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this
Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of a
historic pedod, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The properties were the location of housing for several families of
fieldworkers, who were important to Cucamonga's agricultural era.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone
renowned or important or a local personality.
.Fact/s: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area, primarily for their
aptitude in construction.
/ 2:2,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
HISTORIC POINT OFINTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105
Apd114,2004
Page 2
Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use,
which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The properties were used by several families involved with local
agdculturs, which is no longer a common occurrence in the
Cucamonga area.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Historic Point of Interest Designation is
exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption
(historical resource restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designations. The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Histodc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 on the 14th day of April, 2004,
subject to the following conditions:
1)The house (structure) at 9494 Foothill Boulevard shall be offered to the
public for relocation or salvage for a period of 30 days pdor to demolition.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City
Planner plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to
preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified structures.
Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed prior to
the first occupancy of any Motor Court town home.
6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Rich Macias, Chairman
A'I-I'EST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular
meeting of the Histodc Preservation Commission held on the 14th day of April 2004, by the following
vote-to-wit:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-04
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105
Apdl 14, 2004
Page 3
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL
/25
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Apd114, 2004
Chairman Macias called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman
Macias then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Para Stewart
ABSENT: Cristine McPhail
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullet, City Planner;, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan Coleman,
Principal Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Douglas Fenn,
Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Assistant Planner; Betty Miller,
Associate Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Secretary;
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Bid Bullet, City Planner, welcomed students from Rancho Cucamonga High School and gave a
brief overview of the meeting ~rmat and public headng process.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stewart, carried 3-0-1-1 (McPhail absent, Macias abstain),
to approve the minutes of February 11, 2004.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Brad Bullet, City Planner, suggested the public hearing for Item A of the Historic Preservation
Commission be opened and then concurrently open the public hearing for Planning Commission
Items A, B, and C, so that the Historic item could be heard in conjunction with the related Planning
Commission items.
Chairman Macias then opened the public headng.
A. HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to designate six residences located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482,
and 9494 Foothill Boulevard as a Histodc Point of Interest and allow relocation or demolition of
all or some of the subject structures - APN: 0208-141-06, 08, 09, 11, 13, and 14. Related Files:
Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567,
Development Review DRC2003-01036, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139.
Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that the public headng was still open for the Historic
Preservation item, Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105, and that it would be heard
concurrently with the related Planning Commission Items A, B, and C as noted above.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report noting that a few minor corrections
were being made to the resolutions. He commented that the resolutions delineate the 18 single-
family structures as condominiums and that since each property owner will own the individual lots,
the resolutions should indicate that they are single-family detached homes. In addition, he noted that
on page 142, A-C of the agenda packet, that condition #3 would be revised to read, "The buildings
along the west boundary shall be adjusted to provide a minimum 20-foot setback and a continuous
buffer of the Podocarpus evergreen trees shall be provided along the project boundary." He added
that on page 160, A-C of the agenda packet, condition #15 would be changed to read, "Six foot
decorative block walls shall be constructed along the east and west project perimeter. For perimeter
walls, if a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with
the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous
property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project
perimeter."
Chairman Macias asked the Commissioners if there were any questions.
Commissioner Stewart asked why the other homes were not being relocated like the one at 9494
Foothill Boulevard. She asked whywe did not require the developer to payto have all of the homes
moved for preservation. She commented that from a histodc preservation perspective, she
wondered if offering the homes for purchase or salvage is enough. She was concerned that pen~aps
we have not done enough to save these structures and that from the larger perspective of the
Etiwanda Historic Study Task Force; she knows Etiwanda is looking for historical structures.
Mr. Henderson responded that the Craftsman house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard is an example of
classic Craftsman architecture and that it has been well cared for. He commented that it is the only
home of the group that has architectural significance and is unique. He remarked that the other
homes are very simple and have been structurally altered and are not in very good shape. He added
that they did not consider the homes as a group in the sense of being a historical district either
because they are not really linked by design or arrangement and the area has been split apart with
various commercial businesses. He noted that the other homes are also quite small (800-900
square feet) and it would be difficult to find someone that would be willing to invest in and rehabilitate
such small homes.
Commissioner Stewart said she had overlooked the size of the homes. She commented that the
City now has the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force that is trying to get more significant
historic homes moved into the historic area. She noted that she wants to be cautious about
destroying homes that may have merit and at the same time post a plaque giving Klusman
recognition and then not do the appropriate thing by destroying homes. She remarked that she
believes the Task Force will want the relocation of the Craftsman house.
Mr. Bullet responded and noted that we (the City) do not want to see a loss of our historic resources
because of relocation or rehabilitation costs. He remarked that the other homes moved to the
Northtown area are larger and that this particular group of homes not being considered to be
relocated or restored tonight are not recommended for preservation because of their small size and
because their architecture is not representative of the historic element found in Etiwanda and even
the one on 9494 may not be the appropriate age or size for the Etiwanda area.
Rhonda Kneeley, John Laing Homes, 255 East Rincon Street, Corona, stated that they had
contacted the Northtown Housing Development representatives to discuss their possible interest in
the old homes. She remarked that their only interest was in the Craftsman home at 9494. She
added that they would continue to work with staff on Commissioner Stewart's suggestion. She
HPC Minutes -2- Apd114, 2004
/2.7
added that there are other conditions that they are requesting to be revised including the conditions
found on pages 113, 128, and 130, A-C of the agenda packet, which, with the revisions, will
specifically allow the building permits for the model homes to be issued prior to; 1) the precessing of
the Vacation of 2nd Avenue; 2) the recording of the final Tract Map; 3) the recording of the CC&Rs
and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association, and 4) the submission of the Street
Improvement Plans.
Chairman Macias opened the public hearing.
Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton Street, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he is excited and happy
with the new proposed project over the project proposed a year ago. He remarked that he likes the
design and believes the project will enhance the property values adjacent to the project. He
commented that the developer was responsive to their concerns regarding public safety and he is
pleased they are putting in a traffic signal at the intersection of San Bemardino Road and Archibald
Avenue. He pointed out that a number of people were in attendance at the meeting with him and he
asked them to stand showing their support of the project (5 people stood). He reported that this is a
democretic process and that it works well. He noted for the benefit of the high school students in
attendance that when the previous project was proposed for this site, 400 people came out in
opposition. He remarked that if you are going to come out and complain about a preject that you also
have the responsibility to come out in support (of a good project).
Gilbert McCoy, 9340 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he and his wife own Foothill
Mobile Manor trailer park. He reported that he is supportive and excited about the new project. He
said the project will make a wonderful neighbor and should help with the difficulties they now
experience with drug activity on the property and people jumping the fence who cause damage to the
trailer park. He added that many of the residents were in attendance in support of the project and
that he said of the 90 units in the park, there is almost 100 percent support of appreval for the
project.
Jayme Walinga, 11357 Mountain View Drive, #132, Rancho Cucamonga, asked fora definition of the
term "seller/salvage" and if the home became a Historic landmark, would the designation keep that
from happening.
Commissioner Stewart explained that it is her understanding that if the home is not sold then the
home could be dismantled and sold off in pieces. She noted an example would be that someone
could come and buy the bathroom fixtures and someone else might buy the doors or hardware from
the house. She said specifically that they are considering relocating the home at 9494 at the least
and to consider the feasibility of relocating all of them. She added that the Point of Interest requires
the developer to place a commemoretive plaque but does not require the preservation or habilitation
of the structures.
Krystal Hereford, 10730 Church Street, #88, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the home at 9494 Foothill
Boulevard is the largest of the homes in question. She asked what would be accomplished if the six
residences are relocated or demolished and if that would that bring in more executives or businesses
to the area.
Chairman Macias closed the public hearing.
Mr. Buller responded and explained why would we remove or demolish severel homes. He explained
that because these homes front the Old Route 66, it is no longer an appropriate place for single-
family detached homes. He added that our goal is to build projects that are good neighbors to the
existing residences and businesses and that as old homes are removed, they are replaced with new
stock that are designed to be better neighbors. He commented that along Foothill Boulevard, we
give a little to get better development for the community. He noted that this project will provide more
HPC Minutes -3- Apd114, 2004
homes for families and they are designed to be moro compatible with the businesses that arc now
located along Foothill Boulevard and they will benefit the businesses as well.
Commissioner Stewart commented that she believes it is a good project although she never roally
was a proponent of the "motor court" concept, but she is in favor of this one because it is mixed use
and Foothill Boulevard needs some attention in that aroa and the design thematically reflects Route
66 with the motor court concept. She added that a condition of the project requiros the developer to
place commemorative plaques along Foothill Boulevard that point out the significance of Route 66.
She added that she appreciated the neighbors' participation and their support.
Commissioner McNiel said he felt is it a good project. Mr. McNiel asked if there is a perimeter block
wall between the single-family home section and the condominium section. He also asked the
developer to be conscientious about keeping the construction dust down and being mindful of the
allowable hours for construction.
Mr. Buller roported that the project has been designed to actually integrate the two sections of the
project and therefore there is no block wall separating them.
Commissioner Fletcher stated that he is in agroement with the other Commissioners and that he is
thdlled and glad about the support of the neighbors and it shows the applicant worked well with them
and addrossed their concams. He added that the new project ties in with the Route 66 motor courts
and the 18 single-family homes provide an excellent transition to the condo project and is excellent
for the homeowners along San Bemardino Road. He added that the visual enhancement would help
revitalize Foothill Boulevard and the west end part of the City.
Commissioner McNiel added that he agroes with Commissioner Stewart in rogard to the rosidence at
9494 Foothill Boulevard and that we should do whatever we can to proserve it. He commented that
we had several homes in the City we attempted to proserve that were never relocated; one was up
on blocks and eventually it fell apart. He commented that he only has a real interest in the
Craftsman home. He noted that he understands why we do not have interest in the other homes.
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, asked if there is any direction or clarification from Engineering
and if the changes to the engineering conditions mentioned would meet with their approval.
Betty Miller, Associate Engineer, stated that allowing Building Permits to be issued for the model
homes pdor to the other conditions being met is not an uncommon roquest and that it would be
acceptable.
Mr. Buher commented that it has been a "good marriage" with John Laing Homes and commended
them for working with the neighborhood and for the neighborhood working with John Laing Homes.
He thanked them and Mrs. Kneeley for their hard work.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stewart, to recommend approval of Historic Point of
Interest DRC2004-00105 and Development Distdct Amendment DRC2003-01037 to be forwarded to
the City Council for final action and to approve Tentative Tract Map SU BTT16567, and Development
Review DRC2003-01036 and to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
and to accept the various revisions to the Conditions of Approval and the Resolutions of Appreval as
noted during the prosentation and public headng. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: McPHAIL - carried
HPC Minutes -4- Apd114, 2004
RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'//- /~'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2004-00105,
DESIGNATING SIX HOUSES BUILT BY THE KLUSMANS, AS A
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 9424, 9434, 9456,
9474, 9482, AND 9494 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0208-141-06, 08, 09, 11,
13, AND 14.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Historic Point of Interest
Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Landmark is referred to as "the application."
2. On April 14, 2004, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval.
3. On May 19, 2004, the City Council held their meeting and approved the Historic Point of
Interest designation.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part"A,"
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 0.14 acre of land per lot, .84 acre in total,
basically rectangular configuration, located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, and 9494 Foothill
Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including minutes of the
public hearing by the Historic Preservation Commission on April 14, 2004, written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Siqnificance:
Findinq 1: The proposed point of interest is particularly representative
of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The properties were the location of housing for several
families of fieldworkers, who were important to
Cucamonga's agricultural era.
Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with
someone renowned or important or a local personality.
Fact/s: The Klusmans were a well-known family in the area,
primarily for their aptitude in construction.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2004-00105
May 19, 2004
Page 2
Findinq 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a
business or use, which was once common but is now rare.
Fact/s: The properties were used by several families involved with
local agriculture, which is no longer a common occurrence
in the Cucamonga area.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated there under, as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Class 3.e.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for
historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark
designations. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Historic Point of
Interest DRC2004-00105 on the 19th day of May 2004, subject to the following conditions:
1) The house (structure) at 9494 Foothill Boulevard shall be offered to the
public for relocation or salvage for a period of 30 days prior to demolition.
2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the
City Planner plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the
site to preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified
structures. Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be
installed prior to the first occupancy of any Motor Court town home.
6. The Mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF MAY 2004.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Memorandum
DALE: May 19th, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager
FROM: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
BY: Paul Kellner, Lieutenant
SUBJECT: AMENDED STAFF REPORT ~ APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE AND
EXPEND MONEY FROM 2003 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG)
AWARD.
Attached you will find an amended Staff Report dated May 19th, 2004, entitled;
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE AND EXPEND MONEY FROM 2003 UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK
GRANT (LLEBG) AWARD. This Staff Report is related to City Council Meeting
Agenda item #132. So there is no confusion, each page of the amended Staff
Report has been marked in the bottom left corner with A-1. Please disregard the
previous Staff Report.
DA[E: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager
FROM: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
BY: T.A. Nicassio, Administrative Lieutenant
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE AND EXPEND MONEY FROM THE
2003 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) AWARD, ACCOUNT
NO.1368000-4740 (GRANT INCOME) BY APPROPRIATING NO MORE
THAN $33,000.00 INTO ACOUNT NO. 1368701-5603, FOR TWENTY-
FIVE TASER INC. X26 LESS THAN LETHAL ELECTRONIC WEAPONS
SYSTEMS; NO MORE THAN $15,000.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO.1368701-
5604, FOR TWO SUZUKI DR-Z400S ENDURO MOTORCYCLES AND
RELATED EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT; AND NO MORE THAN
$10,000.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1368701-5603, FOR THE Q-STAR
COMPANY FLASH-CAM 530 ANTI-GRAFITTI CAMERA SYSTEM.
RECOMMENDATION
Police Department Staff seeks approval to appropriate and expend money from the
2003 United States Department of Justice Local Law Enfomement Block Grant (LLEBG)
award, Account No. 1368000-4740 (Grant Income) by appropriating no more than
$33,000.00 into Account No. 1368701-5603, for twenty-five Taser Inc. X2.6 less than
lethal, electronic weapons systems; no more than $15,000.00 into Account No.
1366701-5604, for two Suzuki DR-Z400S Enduro Motorcycles and related emergency
equipment; and no more than $10,000.00 into Account No. 1368701-5603, for two Q-
Star Company FlashCam 530 Anti-Graffiti Camera system.
The total expenditure for all items described is not anticipated to exceed $58,000.00.
Actual costs are currently being reseamhed by the Purchasing Department.
A-1
BACKGROUND
In 2003, the Mayor and City Council approved the expenditure of these particular
LLEBG funds. The funds had been earmarked for the Police Headquarters helipad, and
the project was tentatively approved by the Department of Justice. The Police
Department then received notification that the helipad project did not qualify under grant
expenditure rules and the money would have to be spent within grant guidelines, which
includes the purchase of equipment for law enforcement.
A detailed background of the equipment being sought is as follows:
1. TASER X26 ELECTRONIC WEAPONS SYSTEMS. The "Tasers" are a less than
lethal weapon alternative for law enforcement. The weapon utilizes two wire
darts which are projected into violently resisting subjects and causes a disruption
of muscle operations by use of modulated electrical impulses. The Tasers have
been found to be completely safe for use on all types of subjects without fear of
long lasting effects or injury. The County of San Bernardino recently approved a
pilot program for the carrying of the Taser less than lethal electronic weapons
system by officers. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Station was chosen as one
of the testing sites for the weapons. County Purchasing, through a
competitive bid process, chose the Davidson Police Equipment Company
of Prescott, Arizona, as the supplier of the Taser units. The City of Rancho
Cucamonga will purchase the Taser units from the County of San Bernardino.
2. SUZUKI ENDRURO MOTORCYCLES. In an effort to explore different methods
of providing quality law enforcement to our community, the Police Department
looked at Enduro type motorcycles, to be used for patrolling parks, undeveloped
areas, horse trails and other areas were access might be difficult or impossible
for conventional police vehicles. After some intensive research by the Traffic
Office of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, it was decided that the
Suzuki DR-Z 400S motorcycle best meets the requirements for a police Enduro
type motorcycle. Enduro type motorcycles from Honda, Yamaha and Kawasaki
were also considered, but the Suzuki is the only water-cooled Enduro motorcycle
currently manufactured in this price range. The only other water cooled Enduro
type motorcycle is the BMW, which cost nearly twice as much per motorcycle.
Oil cooled motor cycles of this type are much heavier, less maneuverable and
more prone to engine problems. The water-cooling is considered imperative due
to the planned operation of the motorcycles and attached emergency equipment
in adverse conditions, such as heat and dust. The water cooled motorcycle
allows for a lighter, more maneuverable motorcycle with power on par with larger
oil cooled motorcycles and an engine that requires less maintenance and has a
longer service life. Another factor in the consideration of the water cooled engine
is the use of emergency lighting while idling.
A-1
-2-
There is a less likelihood of engine overheating and component failure with this
unit. The City of San Diego is currently using the Suzuki and when contacted
regarding their experience with it had nothing but high praise for its performance.
City purchasing has obtained competitive cost quotes for the motorcycles
through local Suzuki vendors.
3. FLASH-CAM ANTI-GRAFITTI CAMERA. Q-Star Technology, Chatsworth,
California, is the sole manufacturer and vendor of the FlashCam-530 anti-graffiti
camera system. Extensive research indicates that there is no similar system
currently being manufactured or distributed. The system consists of a film
camera enclosed in a metal housing, which can be positioned most anywhere.
The purpose of the system is to provide photographic evidence in areas were
vandalism, theft and graffiti might be widespread. The system integrates into the
current Department philosophy of Community Oriented Policing, and would
provide a valuable investigative and deterrent tool. The camera system has
been in use with the Los Angeles Police Department, City of Riverside Police
Department and the San Jose Police Department. Because Q-Star Technology
is the sole manufacturer of this product, police departments and sheriff
departments receive a "municipal" price for the cameras.
ANALYSIS
The reallocation of funds from this previously accepted Federal grant for use in
purchasing equipment essential to law enforcement will help the Department provide a
higher level of service to its residents.
There is no fiscal impact to the City, in that the funds are, essentially, already
encumbered for use by the Police Department.
A-1
-3-
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucarnonga City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager
FROM: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
BY: T.A. Nicassio, Administrative Lieutenant
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE AND EXPEND MONEY FROM THE
2003 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) AWARD, ACCOUNT
NO.1368000-4740 (GRANT INCOME) BY APPROPRIATING NO MORE
THAN $ 33,000.00 INTO ACOUNT N O. 1 368701-5603, F OR TWENTY-
FIVE TASER INC. X26 LESS THAN LETHAL ELECTRONIC WEAPONS
SYSTEMS; NO MORE THAN $15,000.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO.1368701-
5604, F OR TWO SUZUKI D R-Z400S E NDURO MOTORCYCLES AND
RELATED EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT; AND NO MORE THAN
$10,000.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1368701-5603, FOR THE Q-STAR
COMPANY FLASH-CAM 530 ANTI-GRAFITTI CAMERA SYSTEM.
RECOMMENDATION
Police Department Staff seeks approval to appropriate and expend money from the
2003 United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG)
award, Account No. 1368000-4740 (Grant income) by appropriating no more than
$33,000.00 into Account N o. 1 368701-5603, for t wenty-five T aser I nc. X 26 I ess than
lethal, electronic weapons systems; no more than $15,000.00 into Account No.
1368701-5604, for two Suzuki DR-Z400S Enduro Motorcycles and related emergency
equipment; and no more than $10,000.00 into Account No. 1368701-5603, for two Q-
Star Company FlashCam 530 Anti-Graffiti Camera system.
The total expenditure for all items described is not anticipated to exceed $58,000.00.
Actual costs are currently being researched by the Purchasing Department.
BACKGROUND
In 2003, the Mayor and City Council approved the expenditure of these particular
LLEBG funds. The funds at been earmarked for the Police Headquarters helipad, and
the project was tentatively approved by the Department of Justice. The Police
Department then received notification that the helipad project did not qualify under grant
expenditure rules and the money would have to be spent within grant guidelines, which
includes the purchase of equipment for law enforcement.
A detailed background of the equipment being sought is as follows:
1. TASER X2(~ ELECTRONIC WEAPONS SYSTEIMS. The "Tasers" are a less
than lethal weapon alternative for law enforcement. The weapon utilizes two wire
darts which are projected into violently resisting subjects and causes a disruption
of muscle operations by use of modulated electrical impulses. The Tasers have
been found to be completely safe for use on all types of subjects without fear of
long lasting effects or injury. The County of San Bernardino recently approved a
pilot program for the carrying of the Taser less than lethal electronic weapons
system by officers. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Station was chosen as one
of the testing sites for the weapons. County Purchasing, through a competitive
bid process, chose the Davidson Police Equipment Company of Prescott,
Arizona, as the supplier of the Taser units. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will
purchase the Taser units from the County of San Bernardino.
2. SUZUKI ENDRURO MOTORCYCLES. In an effort to explore different methods
of providing quality law enforcement to our community. The Police Department
looked at Enduro type motorcycles, to be used for patrolling parks, undeveloped
areas, horse trails and other areas were access might be difficult or impossible
for conventional police vehicles. After some intensive research by the Traffic
Office of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, it was decided that the
Suzuki DR-Z 400S motorcycle best me the requirements for a police Enduro type
motorcycle. Enduro type motorcycles from Honda, Yamaha and Kawasaki were
also considered, but the Suzuki is the only water-cooled Enduro motorcycle
currently manufactured in this price range. The only other water cooled Enduro
type motorcycle is the BMW, which cost nearly twice as much per motorcycle.
Oil cooled motor cycles of this type are much heavier, less maneuverable and
more prone to engine problems. The water-cooling is considered imperative due
the planned operation of the motorcycles and attached emergency equipment in
adverse conditions, such as heat and dust. The water cooled motorcycle allows
for a lighter, more maneuverable motorcycle with power on par with larger oil
cooled motorcycles and an engine that requires less maintenance and has a
longer service lifo. Another factor in the consideration of the water cooled engine
is the use of emergency lighting while idling. There is a less likelihood of engine
overheating and component failure with this unit. The City of San Diego is
currently using the Suzuki and when contacted regarding their experience with it
-2-
had nothing but high praise for is performance. City purchasing has obtained cost
quotes for the motorcycles through local Suzuki vendors.
3. FLASH-CAM ANTI-GRAFITTI CAMERA. Q-Star Technology, Chatsworth,
California, is the sole manufacturer and vendor of' the FlashCam-530 anti-graffiti
camera system. Extensive research indicates that there is no similar system
currently being manufactured or distributed. The system consists of a film
camera enclosed in a metal housing, which can be positioned most anywhere.
The purpose of the system is to provide photographic evidence in areas were
vandalism, theft and graffiti might be widespread. The system integrates into the
current Department philosophy of Community Oriented Policing, and would
provide a valuable investigative and deterrent tool. The camera system has
been i n u se with t he L os Angeles Police Department, City o f Riverside Police
Department and the San Jose Police Department.
ANALYSIS
The reallocation of funds from this previously accepted Federal grant for use in
purchasing equipment essential to law enfomement will help the Department provide a
higher level of service to its residents.
There is no fiscal impact to the City, in that the funds are, essentially, already
encumbered for use by the Police Department.
-3-
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ NC IN E E I~IN G D I~DAI~ TM I~N T
StaffRe rt
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cam Amos, Contract Engineer
st~j~rr: APPROVAL ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW PROJECT DRC2003-00302, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVE., SUBMI'I-rED BY
WEST ROCK, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution regarding
Development Review Project DRC2003-00302, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and
authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Development Review Project DRC2003-00302, located south of Arrow Route and west
of HeJlman Avenue, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3), was approved by the
Planning Commission on September 24, 2003. This project is for a 17,000 square foot
multi-tenant auto service center on 1.4 acres of land.
The Developer, West Rock, LLC, has signed a street improvement agreement and
deposited cash securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in
the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $ 11,500.00
Labor and Material Cash Bond $ 5,75000
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00330- SILVER OAK DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC
December 17, 2003
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Street improvement plans are substantially complete and a grading permit has been
issued. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on
file in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Wilr~aCn J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CA:tch
Attachments
FOOTHILL
ARROW ROUTE
8TH STREET
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
N
CITY OF 1T~:'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE:'~ONS £ N 7- ~ W~ 1 V~ ,'~ -
~IN~JNG D~ON EXHIBIT:'.~. ~ ST' ~OC K L L U
RESOLUTION NO. ~'~"'/57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTIiNG
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW PROJECT DRC2003-00302.
WHEREAS, Development Review Project DRC2003-00302, submitted by West Rock, LLC,
and consisting of a 17,000 square foot multi-tenant auto service center on 1.4 acres of land
located south of Arrow Route and west of Hellman Avenue, in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 3), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on
September 24, 2003; and
WHEREAS, signed Consent and Waiver Forms to join the appropriate Landscape and
Lighting Districts have been filed with the City Engineer as a Condition of Approval; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Consent and Waiver Forms submitted by said
developer be the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is here by authorized to sign said
Consent and Waiver Forms on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga..
~AN£flO C~CANONGA
Memorandum
DATE: May 18, 2004
TO' Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineei ~-/F'
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - E. 12-.- Consent Calendar
E. 12 APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 15716-2,
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD SUBMITTED BY
VICTORIA GARDENS MALL, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY
Please remove E. 12 from the City Council Agenda. The Developer was unable to
obtain signatures on the agreements at this time. This item will come back at a later
date.
WJO:tch
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ N GIN E E l~ IN C. I) E PAI~ TM ~ N T
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O2qeil, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15716-2
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD SUBMITTED BY VICTORIA GARDENS,
LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map No.
15716-2 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map No.15716-2, a phased development of Parcel Map 15716 approved by the Planning
Commission on January 23, 2002 for the development of 97 parcels and 39 lots for open space,
landscaping and maintenance purposes, is located on the northeast comer of Foothill Blvd. and
Day Creek Blvd.
The Developer, Victoria Gardens, LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $12,500.00 (Cash Deposit)
Labor and Material Bond: $ 6,250.00 (Cash Deposit)
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 15716-2 - VICTORIA GARDENS, LLC
May 19, 2004
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JS:tch
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15716-2 AND IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15716-2 (Phased Parcel Map No. 15716), submitted by Victoria
Gardens Mall, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and consisting of 16 numbered parcels
and one (1) lettered lot, located on the northeast comer of Foothill Blvd. and Day Creek Bl{,d., was
approved by the Planning comnmssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 23, 2003, and
is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant
to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15761-2 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on said Tentative Parcel Map No. 15716; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement by
Victoria Gardens Mail, LLC, as developer; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for
street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated
thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement submitted by said developer be and the
same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for
dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15716-2 is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be
filed for mcord.
Iql
RESOL ION NO. 0 q" /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl_, OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL~ORNL4, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 15716-2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintemmce district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIlD of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
PM 15716-2
May 19, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
VICTORIA GARDENS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMYYED LIABILITY COMPANY
The legal description of the Property is:
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AS
"DESIGNATED REMAINDER PARCEL - 6.050 AC." AND "DESIGNATED REMAINDER
PARCEL - 6.630 AC." OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15716-1, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FII.E IN
PARCEL MAP BOOK 199, PAGES 6 ! TO 81, INCLUSIVE; Al.l. OF LOT U OF SAID PARCEL
MAP NO. 15716-2; A PORTION OF VICTORIA GARDENS LANE AS SHOWN ON SAID
PARCEL MAP O. 15716-1; AND A PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON
SAID PARCEl. MAp NO. 15716-1, A! J. IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways,
street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres
associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance
building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arteriai streets within the ~-ights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this
area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north
of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this
district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by tl~e district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: Parcel Map 15716-2
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD# 1 --- 0 .........
SLD#3 0 ............
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 3B ---
--- 0 70
*Existing items installed with original project
Exhibit C
To
Consent And Waiver To Annexation
Of Certain Real Property To
A Street Light Maintenance District
And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments
On Such Real Property
Proposed Annual Assessment
FOR
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
(ARTERIAL STREETS)
FISCAL YEAR 2003/04
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue
Factor
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi-
Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercia
1 Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PARCEL MAP 15716-2) is:
14.195 acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $504.49 Annual Assessment
C-I PM 15716-2 /q7
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00
Multi-
Family Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,84660
Commercia
1 Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17
Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59
TOTAL $254,339.36
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (PM 15716-2):
14.195 acres x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,338.59
THE CITY OF
-~
I~AN CH 0 C U CA M 0 N ~A
$ Repo
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECI: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHT
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16542,
LOCATED AT 6717 EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF VICTORIA STREET,
SUBMITTED BY J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16542,
accepting the subject agreement, securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Light Maintenance.District Nos. 1 and 8 and authorizing
the Mayor to sign the said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map 16542, located at 6717 East Avenue, north of Victoria Street, in the Low
Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on
January 14, 2004. This project is for an 1 l-lot subdivision on 4.92 acres of land.
The Developer, J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC, is submitting an agreement, securities and
monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $107,$00.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 53,650.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,950.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16542 - J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC
May 19, 20(:4
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and
Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully sub~nltted,
~i,~/am J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:RG:tch
Attachments
INTERSTATE 210 FREEWAY
HIGHLAND AVENUE
SITE
VICTORIA STREET
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF ITEM: TI*ACT ?flAp No.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ~// ~/P, JITY' P/IAP
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: ~-
NO. pq. / ,tO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI.1FORNIA, APPROVING TRACT
MAP NO. 16542, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16542, submitted by J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC,
and consisting of a subdivision of 4.92 acres of land into 11 lots, located at 6717 East Avenue, north
of Victoria Street, in the Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 14, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16542 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on the Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by
the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities by J.T.
Storm Development No. 2, I.[ .C, as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
that said Tract Map No. 16542 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is
authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
/
NO. ,0 q- / /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHT
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP
16542
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No.8, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIlD of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'erritory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16542 - J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC
May 19, 2004
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and ail of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above mcitais are ail tree and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each pamel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
J.T. Storm Development No. 2, LLC,
A California Limited Liability Company
The legal description of the Property is:
THE NORTH V2 OF LOT 12, IN BLOCK G, ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF
SAID COUNTY.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
EXHIBIT "A"- ~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTll
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2003/2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA)
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda
South Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived
from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district.
Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees
and community trails.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the fights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA):
Street Light Maintenance District No. $ (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South
Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda
Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the inconporated area
of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within
this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area.
/57
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004)
For Project: TRACT 16542
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...............
SLD#8 5 ............
*Existing items installed with original project
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD # 8 ......... 34
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU S 1 S 8 L8
N/A 11 11 11 11
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2003~2004
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.8 (SOLTI'H ETIWANDA):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $151.45 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda):
# of Assessment # of Rate Per
Physical Units Assessment Assessment
Land I lse Tyne Units Factor I lnits I Init Revenue
Single Parcel 153 1.00 1153 $151.45 $23,171.85
Family
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16542) is:
11 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $151.45 Rate Per A.U. = $1,665.95 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi-
Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16542) is:
11 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1'95.47 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda):
# of Rate Per
Physical #of Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Physical Units Units Unit Revenue
Units Factor
Single
Family Parcel 497 1.00 497 $193.75 $96,293.75
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (TR 16542):
11 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.U. = $2,131.25 Annual Assessment
I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
E NGIN I~ DIN G DE DADT~I~N T
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Walter C Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR AWARD AND EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT IN TI-BE AMOLrNT OF $205,000.00 TO DAN GUERRA AND
ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10%
CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,500.00, FOR CONSTRUCTION
SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR PHASES 3B(A) AND 3B(B)
OF CFD 2003-01, TO BE FLrNDED FROM FUND 614 - CFD 2003-01, ACCOUNT
NO. 16143035300/1442614-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dan
Guerra and Associates to provide professional services for Phases 3B(A) and 3B(B) of CFD 2003-
01, including survey and construction administration services and authorize the Mayor to sign said
agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Community Facilities District (CFI)) 2003-01 funds the design and construction of necessary public
facilities integral with the proposed mall near Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway, as well as
future residential development north of the proposed mall site. This infrastructure has been,
designed and will be constructed in multiple phases. Phase 3B(A) and 3B(B) are the consist of the
installation of street, storm drain, sewer, and water facilities on Foothill Blvd. between Rochester
Ave. and the 1-15 Fwy. Below is a listing of all phases associated with the construction of public
improvements within the Victoria Gardens Mall sphere.
/?,,I
CITY COUNCiL STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, PHASES 3B(a) and 3B(b)
May 19, 2004
Page 2
# Phase Description Status
1 Ph lA Day Creek Blvd. north of Church St. and Church St. west of Day Creek Blvd. Mass Construction complete.
Grading of the residential area north of Church St. and water, sewer, traffic signals, and Improvements accepted.
major storm drain improvements
2 Ph lB(a) Day Creek Blvd. south of Chumh St., Church Sl. east of Day Creek Blvd., Victoria Park Under construction.
Lane north of Chumh St., Arbor Ln. north of Church St., and Base Line Rd. east of Day Completion Sept '04.
Creek Blvd. Also water, sewer, major storm drain, landscaping and traffic signals.
3 Ph lB(b) North side of Foothill Blvd. west of Day Creek Blvd. In addition storm drain, sewer and Requesting award.
water. Completion Sept. '04.
4 Ph lB(c) Sidewalk and landscaping on Day Creek Blvd north of Church St. Under construction.
Completion Aug. '04.
5 Ph lB(d) Traffic Signal at Church St. and Etiwanda Ave Awaiting Caltrans Permit.
6 ~ Ph lB(e) Landscaping on Arbor Ln. north of Church St. Completing design.
7 Ph 3A Street, major storm drain, and water on Victeqa Gardens Ln. Under construction.
Completion Aug. '04
8 Ph 3B(a) Foothill Blvd. east of Day Creek Channel. Requesting award.
Completion Sept. '04.
9 Ph 3B(b) Foothill Blvd. west of Day Creek Channel. Requesting award.
Completion Sept. '04.
10 Ph 3B(c) Mall public sewer and water Construction complete.
11 Ph 01/03 Final street cap, and cleanup work Under design.
For survey work on this phase staff has received a proposals from Dan Guerra and Associates that
meets all of the City's requirements. Dan Guerra and Associates has provided service to the City for
the previous phases of CFD improvements. The firm is uniquely aware of the problems inherent to
the site and has great deal of information already in their records that is being used for this project.
Other consultants wilt not be able to provide this level of service since they are not familiar with the
project which has been going on for over two years. In addition, Dan Guerra and Associates has not
changed their prices from the original proposal made over two years ago. Copy of the consultant's
price schedule is attached with this staff report. Based on the above, staff recommends the proposal
from Dan Guerra and Associates meets all the City's requirements in the amount of $205,000.00
funded from Account No. 16143035300/14426140-0. Staff recommends the City Council approve
this agreement.
Re~ully submitted,
W lli~fn J. O Neil
City Engineer
WJO: WCS
Attachments
, ..........
PROJECT I' ~
SITE "~,.
CITY OF RANCHO .CUCAMONGA
Phase lB(b), 3B(a) and 3B(b) of
.... ~AND SURVEYORS
~. ,.-~ f~AOE~ARK ~TREET, RANCHO CUCAUONGA, CALJFORNIA g17~0 [ ~
~ P,o,c: (90~) ~87-4~06 - FAX: ('909) 94~-1528 ~ ' -~ /. ~
STANDARD HOURLY RATES
PUBLIC
PR/NCIPAL ENGINEER
PROJECT MANAGER $160.00 per hour
$135.00 per hour
DESIGNER/DESIGNER CADD
$115.00 per hour
DRAFTSMAN/DRAFTSMAN CADD
$105.00 per hour
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
1-MAN SURVEy CREW* $I10.00 per hour
2-MAN SURVEy CREW * $160.00 per hour
3-MAN SURVEy CREW * $245.00 per hour
CLERICAL $315.00 per hour
$ 70.00 per hour
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERV/CES
Above rates include mileage, - . $105.00 per hour
materials and Supplies. equipment and instruments (eXclusive of rentals), use ofotficc space and
Rates exclude Use ofconsu/tants, equipment rental, blueprinting, photocom,in ...... ~._ ..
will be charged at Engineer's cost plus 15% adminis~ation, if incurred. ~': s, -'-g-uuucuons, etc., Which
Overt/me rates will be 50% greater than those rates
· (8) hours per day (tWelve (12) hours maximum), 40 hours per week and Saturday. Rates for SUnday and
Dan Guerra & Associates approved holidays and woi~tyd' Overt/me is defined aa Work in excess of eight
greater than those rates listed, m excess of twelve (12) hours per day will be 100%
· Rates exclude use of Global Positioning System Equipment. GPS use rates will be added at $925/day.
PHOI~'- (.909) 957-45,06 - FAX: (,909) ~41--1525
STANDARD HOURLY RATES
PUBLIC
$160.00 per hour
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
$135.00 per hour
PROJECT MANAGER
$115.00 per hour
DESIGNER/DESIGNER CADD
$105.00 per hour
DRAFTSMAN/DRAFTSMAN CADD
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES $110.00 per hour
$160.00 per hour
1-MAN SURVEY CREW*
$245.00 per hour
2-MAN SURVEY CREW *
$315.00 per hour
3-MAN SURVEY CREW *
$ 70.00 per hour
CLERICAL
$105.00 per hour
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Above rates include mileage, eqmpment and instruments (exclustve of rentals), use of
office space and materials and supplies..
Rates exclude use of consultants, equipment rental, blueprinting, photocopying,
reproductions, etc., which will be charged at Engineer's cost plus 15% administration, if
incurred.
Overtime rates will be 50% greater than those rates liste · Overtime is de£med as work in
excess of eight (8) hours per day (twelve (12) hours maximum), 40 hours per week and
Saturday. Rates for Sunday and Dan Guerra & Associates approved holidays and work in
excess of twelve (12) hours per day will be 100% greater than those rates listed.
· Rates exclude use of Global Positioning System Equipment. GPS use rates will be
added at $925/day.
Page 5 of 5
- PHONE: (gog) 987-4306 - FAX: (gOg).941,--157,.~ f~ ~
STANDARD HOURLY RATES
PUBLIC
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $160.00 per hour
PROJECT MANAGER ' $135.~}0 per-hour
DESIGNER/DESIGNER CADD $115.00 per hour
DRAFTSMAN/DRAFTSMAN CADD $105.00 per hour
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES $110.00 per hour
I-MAN SURVEY CREW* $160.00 per hour
2-MAN SURVEY CREW * $245.00 per hour
3-MAN SURVEY CREW * $315.00 per hour
CLERICAL $ 70.00 per hour
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES $105.00 per hour
Above rotes include mileage, equipment and instmmonts (exclusive of rentals), usc of
office space and materials and supplies.. '
Rates exclude use of consultants, equipment remal, bluepr~ting~ photocopying,
reproductions, etc., which will be charged at Engineer's cost plus 15% adminlntration, if
incurred.
' Overtime rates will be 50% greater than thos~ rmv_ listed~ Overtime is defined as work in
excess of eight (8) hours per day (twelve (12) hours maximum), 40 hours per week and
. Saturday. Ratgs for Sunday and Dan Guerra & Associates approved holidays and work in
excess of twelve (12) hours per day will be 100% greater than those rates listed.
· Rates exclude use of Global Positioning System Equipmant. OPS use rates wflll be
added at $925/day.
Page 4 cf;
,-,
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E N C IN I~I~D IN G DI~PAI~ T HI~N T
StaffRe rt
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, A1CP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG
THE ONTARIO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L.P. REGARDING
iNSTALLATION OF 60" STORM DRAIN AND OTHER RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO CITY FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL
MAP 16245, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TM
STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY JEFFERSON AT
FOURTH, L.P.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution for Parcel Map 16245,
accepting the subject Reimbursement Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk
to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 16245, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue, within the
Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the
Planning Commission on November 12, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of 2 parcels on
23.56 acres of land.
The Developer, Jefferson at Fourth, L.P., previously submitted an agreement and securities to
guarantee the construction of 4th Street 60"Storm Drain and other related improvements and was
approved by the City Council on March 17, 2004, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $ 380,800.00
Labor and Material Bond $190,400.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARCEL MAP 16245 .- JEFFERSON AT FOURTH, L.P.,
May 19, 2004
Page 2
One of the conditions of Parcel Map 16245 is that downstream storm drain systems provide
adequate protection for the development. As a result, the Developer has requested the Ontario
Redevelopment Agency and City of Ontario's approval for Developer to construct the 4th Street
60" storm drain and other related improvements that will enable Developer's project to be
constructed now rather than waiting until the Ontario RDA Agency constructs said
improvements later this year. Said improvements are located on the north side of 4th Street
between Cleveland and Milliken Avenues. As an accommodation to Developer's construction
schedule, the City of Ontario and it's Agency and City of Rancho Cucamonga are agreeable to
allow the Developer to install said improvements. Ontario Redevelopment Agency will
reimburse Developer the differential construction cost and City of Rancho Cucamonga will
provide inspections and maintenance pertaining to the 60" storm drain. This project will be done
at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga except for budgeted inspection costs.
The Developer is submitting a Reimbursement Agreement by and among the Ontario
Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Jefferson On Fourth, L.P., for the
installation of the 4~ Street 60" storm drain and other related improvements. Copies of the
agreement are available in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERING DIVISION
"Lc
Willi!m~J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:tch
Attachments
N
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~'~J~:~-~~~
ENGIN~.E~ZNG DIVISION EXICT~IT:~ ·
/~?,
RESOLUTION NO. ~/7/'' /~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE
ONTARIO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JEFFERSON ON FOURTH,
L.P., REGARDING INSTALLATION OF 60'" STORM DRAIN
AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITH NO CITY
FUNDS INVOLVED FOR PARCEL MAP NO.16245,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Jefferson On Fourth, L.P., the
Developer, for the installation of 4th Street 60" storm drain and other related improvements and
generally located on the north side of 4th Street between former Cleveland and Milliken
Avenues; and
WHEREAS, installation of such improvements, described in said Reimbursement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as Parcel Map 16245; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said
Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
TH E C ITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONCA
Mernorandtun
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manag~'---~"~,~
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineef~-//y(,
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - E.~6<- CONSENT CALENDAR - THE TILE
HAS CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
PPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH URS
CORPORATION, FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF
THE GRAND PRIX FIRE IN THE AMOUNT OF $171,460.00, AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN
THE AMOUNT OF $17,100.00, TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL
RESERVE, ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300, AND APPROPRIATE
$171,460.00 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$17,100.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300 FROM CAPITAL
RESERVE FUND BALANCE
The staff report submitted to City Council (Consent Calendar Item E-16) did not have
the proposal amounts. The attached staff report is an extension to the previous report
earlier submitted.
WJO:dlw
Attachments
T H E C I T Y 0 F
]~ANCHO CUCAMONGfl
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH URS CORPORATION,
FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COST
ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS
NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF THE GRAND PRIX FIRE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $171,460.00, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A
10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,100.00, TO BE FUNDED
FROM CAPITAL RESERVE, ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300, AND
APPROPRIATE $171,460.00 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $17,100.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300 FROM
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is submitted per Engineering Division staff report in Section E of the Consent
Calendar, Item 16 of this evening's agenda (copy attached). Staff recommends the
award and authorization of execution of a Professional Services Agreement with URS
Corporation for the preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates for
Emergency Erosion Control projects necessary in the wake of the Grand Prix Fire in the
amount of $171,460.00, plus a 10% contingency, to be funded from Capital Reserve
Account No. 10250015300 and authorize an appropriation into account No.
10250015300 in the amount of $171,460.00 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of
$17,100.00 from the Capital Reserve fund balance.
BACKGROUND:
On May 3, 2004, staff solicited three proposals (copies attached) for the technical
design of the emergency erosion control projects from three reputable, Civil Engineering
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF EROSION
CONTROL PROJECTS
May 19, 2004
Page 2
firms within the City. Two proposals were submitted in response to the request. The
proposal from URS Corporation cleady demonstrates an understanding of the project's
scope and provides for all of the necessary studies and area survey.
URS is familiar with FEMA's procedures to assure the reimbursement of the eligible
portions of the erosion control measures. URS has indicated they have the staff to
dedicate to the project to ensure that the designs are completed and ready for
construction by November 1, 2004.
Respectfully submitt~ed,
City Engineer
WJO:MEP
Location Map
City of Rancho Cucamonga
GIS Division
5/4/04
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS RESULTING FROM GRAND PRIX
~u LOCATION DRAINAGE NAME LEGAL AND PLAT
~ FOR EASEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION COST ESTIMATE
E9 NORTH OF ALMOND, WEST EAST FORK OF THE YES Phase 1 - 150' Debris rack north of Badiola Parcel reshape ravine walls to channel flow~ Phase 1
AND OF CARNELIAN CARNELIAN DRAIN ~o west side of canyon, Phase - 2 Replace private channel w~th concrete 5x4 concrete $246,375.00
E¶6
YES ~armel, RCB under Bella Vista and inlet/spillway Phase 2 $262,160.00
El 6 YES East Fork - Debris Rack in streembed, Increase Inlet Area, provide CMP riser for out~et, East Fork
AND -{ERMOSAAT ALMOND EAST FORK OF THE
E17 ALTA LOMA CREEK ~n 2 acre blanket drainage easement at northeast comer Hermosa and Sunny Slope, $247,430.00
NO West Fork - Debris racks, rip-rap at outlet, berm on east side of natural stream bed West Fork $275,060~00
E4 SKYLINE DR AT NORTH CITY
LIMITS YES Repair streambed, rock armour at curve, ptaca debris rack, add to inlet structure
$48,450.00
E7 PRIVATE DRAINAGE NORTH WEST FORK OF YES Construct debris rack o 70 LF,
AND ~)F LA COLINA AND VIA THE CARNELIAN $110,000.00
E8 PARAISO KNUCKLE DRIAN YES Construct inlet structure at north end of Channel $60,780.00
HUNTSWOOD, NORTH OF BARRET TRACT
E14 MEADOWOOD INLET NO Construct concrete down drain within existing basin to intercept flows from north
$19,887.50
E13 ~METHYST AT ALMOND DEMENS WASH YES Construct iow flow drainage system, series of 72" CMP - 2 sets, backfiiled with cancretE
reconstruct street, armour inlet and outlet $139,207.00
E11 KING'S RANCH RD, EAST OF KING'S RANCH YES Construct debris rack - 70 LF
;ATE-WAY $34,250.00
NORTH OF MOONSTONE TO
E12 31TY LIMITS RANCHO WASH NO Construct culvert crossing at Almond Trail $22,150.00
;RESTVIEW AT NORTH CITY
E3 LIMITS YES ~,dd 2' height to existing 580' long berm and grade as necessary
$10,000.00
TOTAL $1,475,749.50
T H E C t T Y 0 F
I~A N C Il 0 C ~l CA ~ 0 N GA
Slaff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD DESIGNATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS TO THE SPECIFIED CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS
SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF
THE FIRE, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10%
CONTINGENCY FOR EACH AGREEMENT, TO BE FUNDED FROM
CAPITOL RESERVE ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300 AND AUTHORIZE
AN APPROPRIATION INTO ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300
Staff has developed a list of emergency projects, necessary for the protection of the
residents in the wake of the Grand Prix Fire. In order to provide protection for the
residents before the beginning of the next rain season and secure FEMA Public
Assistance Funding the City must implement the design process as soon as
possible.
The preliminary construction cost estimate for the projects combined is
$1,500,000.00. There are nine project locations of the nine locations several have
been determined to be eligible for FEMA Public Assistance funding. Public
Assistance funding requires that the improvements be designed and implemented
within six months after the declaration of the disaster. The disaster was declared on
October 27, 2003 with the first six months expiring on April 27, 2004. Staff has
made the request to have the first extension granted. The regulations allow for a
limited number of time extensions to complete construction. Time extensions are
granted based on the advancement of the projects towards completion
Staff expects proposals for services from several consulting firms, it is our intention
to review the proposals and determine whether the projects will be designed by one
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL TO AWARD DESIGNATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO THE
SPECIFIED CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS
SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY EROSION CONTROL
PROJECTS NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF THE FIRE, AND A
consulting firm or divided among several to speed the design process and deliver
the facilities as soon as practicable.
The City Council/Redevelopment Agency agenda packets will be printed for
distribution on May 13, 2004 and the proposal amounts and the determination of
consultants will not be made prior to this date. Proposals will be evaluated upon
receipt and a report regarding staff's recommended action will be provided no later
than Tuesday, May 18, 2004 for action at the May 19, 2004 Council meeting.
Respectfully~ ,~ ~//{~'~ ' submitted,
Willia'rfi J. O Nell
City Engineer
WJO:MP:dlw
~"18-§4 04:48pm From-URS 8RD FLOOR 714 9?3 4086 ?-048 P002/008 F-?6g
May 18,.2004
Ma. Maria Perez
City of Rancho Cueamonga
10500 Civic Cemer Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Subject: Design of]Emergency ]Erosion Control Measures - Proposal
Dear Ms. Perez:
LIPS is pleased to submit o~ proposal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for design services for the
subject project. The purpose of this project is m assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the
design of emergency erosion control measures at eleven different locations throughout the northern
section of the City. Most of these projects have been reviewed by FEMA and have specific design
requirements to follow.
SERVICES
It is proposed that services by project be paid for on a time and materials basis per Attachmem A -
Cost Breakdown and Attachment B - Rate Schedule. UP, S will provide preliminary survey,
engineered drawhags, special provisions, and engineer's cost estimate, supporting technical reports,
and plats and legal descriptions. All drawings and reports will be signed and sealed by a Professional
Engineer. Some or all of those services are proposed for each project location as follows:
Special Teclmieal Plat &
Project Survey Plans Provisions
(Crew Memo or Legal
ID daysy (Sheets) & Cost Report2 Description
Estimate
E9 2 2 1 1 1
El0 I 4 1 1 1
El6 2 4 1 1 1
El7 1 4 1 1
E4 1 2 1 1 1
E7 I 2 1 1 1
E8 1 1 I 1 1
El4 1 1 1
El3 1 3 I 1 1
Ell 1 1 I 1
E3 I I 1 l
1) Ten total Crew Days have been estimated for these projects. If additional surveys are required aa directed by th~ City,
URS can provide these services for an additional fee, on a time and materials basis.
2) Technical reports will consist of 8. I-2 page technical memorandum and hydrology/hydmulic~ to support design.
05'18-04 04:49pm From-UR$ 3RD FLOOR 714 9T3 4066 T-049 p.003/005 F-769
Ms. Maria Percz
City of Rancho Cucamonga
18 May 2004
Page 2
We understand that Project El2 has been deleted from the scope of services.
A field visit fo~ each site will also be performed. We expect that all sitas may be visited in one day.
We also request any other available infonuafion that the City may have on these sitas to be provided
to I. YRS. We assume that wc will usc local or APWA standard drawings and details. No structural
calculataons are entzc~pa
L~RS proposes deliverables, as specified in thc table above, to be submitted to the City for up to two
reviews. Subsequently, URS will incorporate revisions, as directed by thc City, and resubmit. Thc
presented cost estimata assumes that LTRS will be awarded all of the sites, If the total quantity of
sites is reduced, LTRS requests thc opportunity to review the proposed project costs.
We also understand that a limited amount of environmental planning assistaace may be necessary
for some of these projects. If requastcd by thc City, UILS can provide these ~rvices for an additional
fee, on a time and materials basis.
URS is currently working with the City under agreed upon Terms and Conditions on other projects
and this project will use the same Terms and Conditions which are herein incorporated by reference.
The following items are attached to this Proposal: . Attachment A- Cost Breakdown
, Attachment B - Rate Schedule
We look forward to providing ~hese services to you. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Mr. Shannon Willits at 714.648.2749.
Sincerely,
URS CORPORAT. ION
Brian Wyrme
Vice President
Attachments
05--18-04 04:4gpm From-URS 3RD FLOOR T14 g73 4086 T-048 P.004/008 F-700
ATTACHMENT A - COST BREAKDOWN
':' :'' :." ~' :'~:': i'EMERGEN. C¥ ~ERO:SION ;CONTROL, : . :' ,: :' ..
Description I Cost
ID LOCATION
E9 NW Almond/Carnelian - Badiola Parcel $ 19,980
El0 NW Almond/Carnelian -Bella Vista $ 28,040
E16 Hermosa/Almond - East Fork $ 24,240
E17 Hermosa/Almond - West Fork $ 2~.,560
E4 Skyline $ 13,920
E7 La Colina/Via Paralso - Rack $ 13,920
E8 La Colina/Via Paraiso - Inlet $ 12,430
E14 I Huntswood/Meadowood $ 5,630
E13 Amethyst/Almond $ 20,270
Ell . King's RanchJGatewa~, $ 5,090
E3 Crestview $ 4,630
Environmental C~nsuJtation $ 750
TOTAL! $ 171,460
05~,18-04 04:5Open From-URS 3RD FLOOR 714 g?3 4086 T-040 P.005/005 F-T6g
ATTACHMENT B - RATE SCHEDULE
professional Classification
Iprlncipal _ -- 15
~eer / Planner
ineer $ 90
Enginee~ng · Sullying · Planning · Landscape Architecture
May 18, 2004
Ms. Maria E. Perez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
:[0500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re.' Design of Emergency Erosion Control Measures for Various Locations within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Affected by the Grand Prix Fire
Dear Ms. Perez:
In the aftermath of the Grand Prix Fire, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is faced with the threat
of mudflows, requiring immediate action in the form of emergency erosion control measures.
The team of professionals at Hall & Foreman, Inc. (HF]~) understands the urgency of this matter
for reasons of both public safety and federal project funding. To provide the City appropriate
expertise and attention, staffing resources from HFYs Rancho Cucamonga and Irvine offices will
be utilized.
HF]~'s experienced team of professional surveyors and engineers understands the expedited
project timeline and is able to meet it. The team recognizes the importance of mitigating the
threat of mudflows and HFYs familiarity with the affected area allows for increased efficiency.
The City's daily point of contact will be: Harold Garcelon, P.E.
9:[30 Anaheim Place, Suite 120
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909-484-9090
Proiect Understandin_q
HF[ has visited 7 of the 9 sites included in the RFP. There is significant evidence of heavy mud
flows that filled in and breeched natural channels and engineered inlet structures. The City,
with FEMA, has developed project scopes for each location that will manage the debris flows
while protecting public and private property. These project improvements and repairs need to
be confined to the existing channels and inlets as much as possible without creating large
detention basins that would silt up and become ineffective in future events.
Proiect Scooe
Project Priority No. ! and No. 2 are natural stream basins that enter an improved culvert or
channel. Debris will be carried by the high velocities in the channels. Debris racks and erosion
protection will reduce the runoff volume and define the inlet location to collect and discharge
the flows into a public facility. In No. !, a 550-foot 5' x 4' RCB will convey the flows south to a
5' x 6' RCB under Bella Vista, then continue south to the City drainage facility.
Ms. Maria E. Perez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
May 18, 200't
Page 2
Project Priority No. 3 will extend the 20' wide concrete channel west about 25' to interrupt flows
in the east/west channel that parallels the maintenance road. Work will include improving the
inlet to the channel.
Project Priority No. 4 - no information at this time
Project Priority No. 5 - Construct a concrete down drain to protect slope from erosion that
enters the basin. Includes an inlet structure and downstream dissipator.
Project Priority No. 6 - Demens Wash conveys a significant amount of flow across Almond.
Two pairs of 72" CMP culverts will be constructed below street grade and secured enough to
prevent the roadway from being washed 'away.
Project Priority No. 7 - no information at this time
Project Priority No. 8 - Eliminated
Project Priority No. 9 - Add 2' to berm height that was constructed to the east. This will
increase the protection to the property owners to the south.
Surve Pro'ect Sco e
HF~ proposes to establish horizontal and vertical control to serve as a basis for topographic
surveys of the 8 areas identified in the RFP. All sites will be tied together with a common
coordinate basis and vertical datum, of the City's choosing, using post-processed, rapid static,
dual frequency GPS equipment.
This control will serve as a basis for conventional topographic surveying sufficient to prepare a
base map that will include locations of existing structures, pavement, walls, fences, drainage
swales, tops and toes of slopes and culture that may impact construction within 100' of the
proposed improvements. The base map will include a digital terrain model, with contours, to
facilitate the design of each of the specified improvements.
Several of the areas, (#2, 3, 5, 6 & 9) are candidates for aerial topographic mapping since
these areas are free of tree cover and heavy vegetation. This aerial mapping will be sufficient
for design with supplemental conventional surveying, where appropriate. Aerial control and the
mapping for these areas will be provided at no additional cost since it will reduce the amount of
conventional surveying and processing that will be required.
Deliverables
· Plans for each location will be prepared on 20-scale plan only sheets. Each plan
will show the limits of grading, location of stream bed repair, including
dimensions for area, location of debris barriers, street repair, culvert locations,
typical sections, inlet and outlet structures.
Ms. Maria E. Perez
City of Rancho Cucamonga
May 18, 2004
Page 3
· The culvert design from Almond to south of Bella Vista will be plan and profile
including roadway RCP and inlet spillway.
· Cover Sheet
· Eight Plans
· Plan and Profile with Detail Sheet
· Engineer's Estimate
· Special Provisions
· Hydraulic Calculations will be prepared for engineered inlets for projects El0,
E16, E4, E8, E14, E13. Flow rates and hydrology for hydrograph purposes shall
be provided by the City or County.
· Plats and Legal Descriptions shall be prepared for record information provided by
the City or County. Surveys do not include boundary surveys.
Fees
HI:[ proposes to prepare plans, special provisions, engineer's estimates, 'hydraulic calculations,
plats, and legal descriptions for a fixed fee including surveys and deliverables for eight sites as
follows:
Task Fee
1. Topographic Survey and Base Maps $60,000
2. Engineering Drawings $115,000
3. Hydraulic Analysis and Reports $20,000
4. Legal Descriptions and Plats $25,000
5. Deliverables Signed and Sealed by a P.E. $7,000
Total $227,000
Schedule
HF['s proposed schedule is:
· Complete PS&J~ October 1, 2004
· Begin Construction November 1, 2004
On behalf of the entire HFI Team, I would like to personally take this opportunity to be of
service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We look forward to a long-term and positive working
relationship.
Sincerely,
Hall & Foreman, Znc.
Steve Shambeck, P.L.S.
President, Inland Empire Division / Principal
05/19/04 14:47 FAX 9094849084 HALL & FOREMAN ~002
Engineering. Surveying. Planning. Landscape Archit~'ture
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Effective November 1, 2003
OFFICE: $ ! 85.00/Hour
Principal $160.00/Hour
Sr. Project Director $150.00/Hour
Project Director $140.00/Hour
Project Manager $125.00/Hour
Project Engineer/Project Surveyor $130.00/Hour
Principal Planner $100.00/Hour
Planner $125.00/Hour
Senior Designer $110.00/Hour
Staff Engineer $100.00/Hour
Entitlement Coordinator $105.00/Hour
Designer $ 90.00/Hour
Drafter $115.00/Hour
Sr. Inspector/Resident Engineer $105.00/Hour
Inspector $ 65.00/Hour
Project Assistant $275.00/Hour
Expert Witness
SURVEY: $140.00/Hour
Survey Manager $105.00/Hour
Survey Analyst $225.00/Hour
3-Man Survey Crew $185.00/Hour
2-Man Survey Crew $130.00/Hour
1-Man Survey Crew
Note 1: It is Consultant's policy to meet all schedule requirements while maintaining a competent and professional
level of service. In return, it is expected that all invoices will be paid in a timely manner. It is agreed and
understood that all invoices will be considered rlelinquent sixty (60) days after invoice date. Ifinvoiee remains
unpaid on the sixty-first (61st) day after invoice date, a late fee in the form of 10 percent interest per annum will
begin accruing and Consultant will stop work on tiffs project. Ninety (90) days after invoice date Consultant will
lien the property.
Note 2: Client shall pay the cost, plus 15%, for any applicable governmental fees, rifle company charges, well
monuments, outside vendor reproductio~ costs, in-house reproduction cost, plotting costs, mileage and delivery or
messenger services incurred on Client's behalfi If requested, we will provide a computer printout which details these
costs. We do not typically provide any additional hack up for these generally nominal expenses as part of our fee.
Note 3: Miscellaneous fees shall be billed monthly a~ they are incurred. Invoices shall be considered due and
payable upon presentation.
Note 4: The above Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates is for straight time only. In the case of overtime, the rate
charged will be 1-1/2 times the houxly rates shown, and for Sundays and holidays, 3 times the hourly rate shown.
Note 5: The above Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates shall be adjusted ia accordance with Paragraph 26 of the
Standard Provisions of this Agreement.
Note.._.~6: The fee stated herein does not include any sales or use tax. In the event that a sales and/or use tax is
imposed by local, state, or federal authority, upon the services rendered hereunder, such sales and/or use tax shall be
in addition to said fee herein, and shall be the full responsibility of the Client.
T H E C ] T Y 0 F
l~^N C H 0 C UCAM 0 N CA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD DESIGNATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS TO THE SPECIFIED CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS
SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF
THE FIRE, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10%
CONTINGENCY FOR EACH AGREEMENT, TO BE FUNDED FROM
CAPITOL RESERVE ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300 AND AUTHORIZE
AN APPROPRIATION INTO ACCOUNT NO. 10250015300
Staff has developed a list of emergency projects, necessary for the protection of the
residents in the wake of the Grand Prix Fire. In order to provide protection for the
residents before the beginning of the next rain season and secure FEMA Public
Assistance Funding the City must implement the design process as soon as
possible.
The preliminary construction cost estimate for the projects combined is
$1,500,000.00. There are nine project locations of the nine locations several have
been determined to be eligible for FEMA Public Assistance funding. Public
Assistance funding requires that the improvements be designed and implemented
within six months after the declaration of the disaster. The disaster was declared on
October 27, 2003 with the first six months expiring on April 27, 2004. Staff has
made the request to have the first extension granted. The regulations allow for a
limited number of time extensions to complete construction. Time extensions are
granted based on the a. dvancement of the projects towards completion
Staff expects proposals for services from several consulting firms. It is our intention
to review the proposals and determine whether the projects will be designed by one
/7/
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL TO AWARD DESIGNATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO THE
SPECIFIED CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS
SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE EMERGENCY EROSION CONTROL
PROJECTS NECESSARY IN THE WAKE OF THE FIRE, AND A
consulting firm or divided among several to speed the design process and deliver
the facilities as soon as practicable.
The City Council/Redevelopment Agency agenda packets will be printed for
distribution on May 13, 2004 and the proposal amounts and the determination of
consultants will not be made prior to this date. Proposals will be evaluated upon
receipt and a report regarding staff's recommended action will be provided no later
than Tuesday, May 18, 2004 for action at the May 19, 2004 Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~fi J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP:dlw
/¢2-
R A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lan% AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician
SLIBJEIL-T: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND
ACCEPT SURETY FOR ENCROACHMENT INTO CITY EASEMENT OR
RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
POMONA FIRST FEDERAL BANK AND TRUST, AT A LOCATION
WITHIN F1FTH STREET, EAST OF MILL1KEN AVENUE.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve and authorize the execution of agreement for
Encroachment into City Easement or Right-of-Way between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Pomona First Federal Bank and Trust. Encroachment location is within Fifth Street, East of
Milliken Avenue, adjacent to parcels 9467 and 9531 Milliken Avenue.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Pomona First Federal Bank and Trust owners of properties located at 9467 and 9531 Fifth Street,
is requesting to install a Fiber Optic cable connection between their two buildings. They want to
interconnect their two buildings to facilitate corumunications between their sites, which are
located on the north and south sides of Fifth Street. The installation of three 1 IA" innerducts
within two four-inch conduits will be installed, under the street pavement, within the Fifth Street
public right-of-way and located below all utilities, causing no pavement or traffic disturbance.
A condition to issuance of the encroachment/construction permit for the installation, is a hold
harmless and additional special provisions agreement, between the City and Pomona First
Federal Bank and Trust. Prior to issuance of a construction permit, Pomona First Federal Bank
and Trust, was requested to execute the attached agreement, providing a surety of $5,000.00 and
joining the "Underground Service Alert" organization. The City Attorney has reviewed and
approved this agreement.
Respect(ully submitted,
Witl~Mn J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:VC:tch /73
T H C I T Y 0 F
I~AN C H 0 C U CAM 0 N GA
SlaffReport
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
BEST BEST & KREIGER, LLP FOR BOND COUNSEL SERVICES
FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (RANCHO
ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000
FOR FORMATION SERVICES AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$59,500 FOR DEBT ISSUANCE SERVICES. TO BE FUNDED BY
THE PROJECT DEVELOPER.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve A Professional Services Agreement
with Best Best & Kreiger, LLP to provide services as the bond counsel to the City in
relation to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount for these
services will not exceed $25,000 for the formation phase and will not exceed
$59,500 for the debt issuance phase. The developer requesting the formation of this
CFD will pay the total cost for these services.
BackRround
The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public
improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates
residential development This project consists of 632 single-family residential units.
The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The
CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard,
improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm drains, park fees
and school fees. The bond counsel works for the City to insure that the proposed
district is being formed in accordance with all applicable laws and coordinates the
preparation of agreements, documents and legal opinions to support district
formation.
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BEST BEST & KREIGER,
LLP FOR BOND COUNSEL SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 FOR FORMATION
SERVICES AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCE
The developers who are requesting this CFD are paying the cost for the bond
counsel. Because there is no impact to the City financially and because of the need
for an experienced bond counsel to assist in representing the City's legal interests, it
is recommended that this Professional Services Agreernent be approved.
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/73
T H C I T Y 0 F
[] ~{
~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES FOR SPECIAL TAX
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $40,000. TO BE FUNDED BY THE
PROJECT DEVELOPER.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement
with David Taussig & Associates to provide services as the Special Tax Consultant
to the City in relation to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The
amount for these services will not exceed $40,000. The developer requesting the
formation of this CFD will pay the total cost for these services.
BackRround
The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public
improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates
residential development. This project consists of 632 single-family residential units.
The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The
CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard,
improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm drains, park fees
and school fees. The Special Tax Consultant works for the City to insure that the
proposed district has a tax rate that is fair and equitable and is structured in
accordance with the law.
The developers who are requesting this CFD are paying the cost for the Special Tax
Consultant. Because there is no impact to the City financially and because of the
/77
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID TAUSSIG &
ASSOCIATES FOR SPECIAL TAX CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$40,000. TO BE FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELO
need for an experienced Special Tax Consultant to assist in representing the City's
interests, it is recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Sti ff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
EMPIRE ECONOMICS FOR MARKET ABSORPTION SERVICES
FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (RANCHO
ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $15,750.
TO BE FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement
with Empire Economics to provide market absorption services to the City in relation
to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount for these services
will not exceed $15,750. The developers requesting the formation of this CFD will
pay the total cost for these services.
BackRround
The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public
improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates
residential development. This project consists of 632 single-family residential units.
The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The
CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard,
improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm drains, park fees
and school fees. The market absorption study is necessary to insure that the
property in question is economically viable and will be able to support the special tax
for the CFD.
The developer who is requesting this CFD is paying the cost for the market
absorption study. Because there is no impact to the City financially and because of
the need for a market absorption study of the proposed CFD to insure the financial
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EMPIRE ECONOMICS FOR
MARKET ABSORPTION SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $15,750. TO BE FUNDED
BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER.
viability of the CFD, it is recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be
approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
T H C I T Y 0 ~
]~AN C H 0 C U CAH 0 N CA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY
SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$20,000 FOR FORMATION SERVICES AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $43,000 FOR DEBT ISSUANCE SERVICES. TO BE
FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement
with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates to provide services as the financial advisor to
the City in relation to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount
for these services will not exceed $20,000 for the formation phase and will not
exceed $43,000 for the debt issuance phase. The total cost for these services will
be paid by the developer requesting the formation of this CFD.
Backqround
The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public
improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates
residential development. This project consists of 632 single-family residential units.
The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The
CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard,
improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm drains, park fees
and school fees. The financial advisor works for the City to insure that the proposed
district makes financial sense and coordinates the preparation of studies, appraisals
and other documents to support that decision. The financial advisor also works for
/$/
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FIELDMAN, ROLAPP &
ASSOCIATES FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$20,000 FOR FORMATION SERVICES AND AN AMOUNT
the City during the negotiation with the underwriter to insure that the City receives
the most competitive rate possible if and when bonds are sold.
The cost for the financial advisor is being paid by the developers who are requesting
this CFD. Because there is no impact to the City financially and because of the
need for an experienced financial advisor to assist in representing the City's financial
interests, it is recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be approved.
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
T H C I T V 0 F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
BRUCE W. HULL & ASSOC. TO PERFORM APPRAISAL SERVICES IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $30,000 TO BE FUNDED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement
with Bruce W. Hull & Associates to provide appraisal services to the City in relation
to a proposed Community Facilities District (CFD). The amount for these services
will not exceed $30,000. The developers requesting the formation of this CFD will
pay the total cost for these services.
Background
The proposed CFD is being requested by BCA Development, Inc. to fund public
improvements and facility fees associated with the Rancho Etiwanda Estates
residential development This project consists of 632 single-family residential units.
The development is located at the northern terminus of Day Creek Boulevard. The
CFD is being contemplated to fund the extension of Day Creek Boulevard,
improvements to Etiwanda Avenue, new regional and local storm dreins, park fees
and school fees. The appraisal is necessary to insure that the property in question
has sufficient value to support the proposed bonded indebtedness per City policy.
Page 2
May 19, 2004
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRUCE HULL &
ASSOCIATES TO PERFORM APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
The developer who is requesting this CFD is paying the cost for the appraiser.
Because there is no impact to the City financially and because of the need for an
appraisal of the property in the CFD to insure compliance with City policy, it is
recommended that this Professional Services Agreement be approved.
Duane A. Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
R A C H O C U C A M O N G A
Ei~GIN ~ E~IN G DI~PAI~THI~NT
StaffRe[x: t
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech II
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16042, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF 8TM STREET AND CENTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PARK PLACE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
The required improvements for Pamel Map 16042 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond
and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~
As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 16042, located at the southwest corner of 8~h
Street and Center Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the
existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, LLC
Release Faithful Performance Bond: No. 208 23 50 $546,500.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond: No. 208 23 50-M $ 54,650.00
Re~spe~tfully submitted, 7-
'ty g'neer
WJO:KT:tch
Attachments
ARROW ROUTE
N '
~ II ,~ ET
I I "~ 7TH ST T
6TH STREET Il o
II
II
° "'11
~ ~11
/ ~ II
~ ~11
~ 5TH STREET ~ll
4TH STREET
N
CITY OF ~F.~: ~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLF~ ~
KNGINR, ERrNG DIVISION EXHIRIT:
RESOL IO O.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 16042, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION
CASH DEPOSIT
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 16042 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves,
that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of
Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
Skiff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13316/DR 98-10,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE NORTH OF
CARRARI STREET, SUBMITTED BY BARRATT AMERICAN, INC.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 13316/DR 98-10 have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recornmended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of DR 98-10, the houses for previously recorded Tract
13316, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue north of Carrari Street, the applicant was
required to complete street, storm drain, Community Trail and Landscape Maintenance District
improvements. Those improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds.
Developer: Barratt American Incorporated
5950 Priestly Drive, Suite 101
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Streets & Community Trails Storm Drains
Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 111 3351 2399 111 3351 2381
Bond Amount: $2,022,000.00 $2,430,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond No. 1'11 3351 2399 111 3351 2381
Bond Amount: $202,200.00 $243,000.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 13316/DR 98-10
May19,2004
Page 2
The Barratt American improvement agreement and bonds accepted on July 19, 2000, replaced
previous bonds from Friedman Homes, Inc., which allowed the latter to record Tract 13316. The
Friedman Homes bonds can also be released at this time:
Developer: Friedman Homes, Incorporated
10807 Laurel Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Bond No. Bond Amount
Release: Faithful Performance Street Improvements 995232S $2,100,000
Faithful Performance Drainage Improvements 995230S $1,300,000
Faithful Performance Utility Undergrounding 995231S $ 435,000
Faithful Performance Landscaping 995229S $ 380,000
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO/BAM/dlw
CITY OF ITEM: Tract 13316 (DR 98-10)
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING DIVISION / ~0 EXHIBIT: "A"
RESO"UT ON NO. ¢ ¢
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13316/DR 98-10 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13316/DR 98-10
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign
and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
~ A N C h O C U C A M O N G A
]~ NGIN EI~DING DI~PAI~?~II~NT
StaffReport
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 14120-3,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET, WEST OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CARRIAGE ESTATES, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14120-3, located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of
Etiwanda Avenue submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Carriage Estates, LLC
4141 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste. 345
Ontario, CA 91764
Release: Bond No. B32652343 $68,300.00
Respectfully submitted,
Will~am J. O Neil
City Engineer
WO:KT:tch
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7
~ ,
....... SUMMiTZ,AVENt
~ / ; I
CITY OF rrF~: Tract 14120-3
RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA TrrLE:Map
ENGINEERI~/G DMSION EXHIBIT: "A"
R A C H O C U C A M O N G A
RTMENT
StaffRe rt
DALE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14522, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF VINTAGE DRIVE, WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,
SUBMITTED BY YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L.P.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 14522 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14522, located on the south side of Vintage
Drive west of Day Creek Boulevard, the applicant was required to complete street
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bend.
Developer: Young California Homes, L.P.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. 184 95 81 $443,900.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond No. 184 95 81 $44,390.00
i ully submitted,
· O'Neil
neer
WJO:KT:dlw
Attachments
wl{L,.~o~
BOUNDARY OF' ANNEXATION
NORTH ~' NTS
CITY OF ITEM: Tract
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. ~)~"~"'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl_ OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14522 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14522 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of CompJetion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
04/~7,2004 0~:0'2 0~00~00~0~ 1111111 1!1111111111 ~L 02702
Bond #1849581
i:kENG'uMaintenance Bond
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEEBOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California,
Young Califo. lrl!j.~camon~a L.P. (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement
whereby principal agree~ to install and complete certain desi~ated public improvements, which said
agreement, dated __
South side of ViI!L.~a~.~. West of~_._.~L~ Bix,rt. ,20___, and identified a~ project Tract, 14522 located
is hereby refened to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, saki principal is required under the terms of smd agreement to furnish a bond for thc
faithful performance of said agreement, Section 16, guarsntech~g all improvements free of all defects for
period of (1) year after acceptance of ~.. by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and Instmarre of the
a~ held a~nd firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamon~,a therei~afte- --,,-^., ,,,-': ........ .as. surety,.
of the United Staten, for the puyr~e~'i Of which Sum well and truly to'be made, we'bh~d ourselves, our heir~,
successom, executors and administrators; jointly
and s~Verally¢ fu~fly by th~ presents.
he condition of this obligation is such that if the above bonded prin~pal, his or its heirs, executors,
administrators, successors Or ass.igns, .shall in ail things stmld to and abide by, and well a.ild ruby keep and
pcrforra the Covenants, conditions and ~rovislOus in the'said hg~ce~tent and ally alteration' thereof made as
therein spe,cified, and in alt Iespects according to their true intent and meanin . and shall mdc
hamdels Clty, ils OffiCers ........ .q ~..,_ '. . . , . g ' unify and
, --~ ...... u,~ ~mpwyees, as thi~tz:m stt luted, then this ob ' '
and void' ' . pu ligatton shall become null
, othenvise, ~t shall be and remam tn full force and effect
As a part of the obligation secured h~reby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there
.ah,all be included costs and reasonable expenses and fe~, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City
m successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs a~d included in m~y judgment rendered
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreements or to the work to be performed there~mder or the. specifications accompanying the
same shall in anyway affect its obligations mi this bend, and it does he{eby waive notice of any such change,
exlension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNEss WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly exec~ut, ed by the principal and surety above
named on _ l~ril 8 .20
DEVELOPER
SURETY
._Ypung C.alifornia Cucamon__~g~L._p.___ InsuIance Co~xgtly_af_ tha_W~ae_
Name
B~ --1,91 W~.~Sba~tiQ~~__ 93204
/7 Address
RoBer ta Voss ~
PLEASE ATTAcII POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS
SIGNATU]RE$ ?~[UST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE
/97
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Fresno
On f/~/t'~ 7 before me, Lyn Genito, Notary Public,
personally appeared RobertaVoss,
[] personally known to me -OR- [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the' person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
! ~<;~-'~'~ ^ ~- ~LY'~ G~'EN,T~"~ "~ ~ WI~ESS my hand and o~cial seal.
:, ~ COMM. g1390820 ~
? ~ NO~Y PUBLIC- CALIF~N~ ~
~ r S~fN6taff~
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
i PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
ATTORNEY4N-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
c^-:cw 2~ (voo) /~
No. 0002608
ICW GROUP
Power of Attorney
Insurance Company of the West
The Explorer Insurance Company Independence Casualty and Surety Company
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Insurance Company of the West, a Corporation duly orgsnizcd nndur the laws of the State of California, The
Explorer Insurance Company, a Corporation duly organized under the laws of thc State o f Arizona, and Independence Casualty and Surety ~6mpany, a Corporation
duly organized under the laws of the State of Tex0s, (collectively rcferred to as thc "Companies"), do hereby appoint
MATT DEFENDIS, LYN GENITO, STEPHEN E. HIGHEEy, JUSTIN SMIT, ROBERTA VOSS
their ~rue a~d lawflal At~omey(s)-in-Fact with authority to date, execute, sign scai and deliver on teha fofthc Companies fidelity and Sbrety bonds, undertakings,
and other simdar con.acta of suretyship, and any related dacumctns.
In witness whcreo f, the Companies have caused these prescnta to be executed by its dui}, autho6zed officers this 16th day of J~dary, 2001,
~°~ THE EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY
~- o INDEPENDENCE CASUALTy Ai~D SURETY
.~ o COMPANY
John H. Craig, Assistant Secretary John L. ltarmuro, Executive Vice Pt~td~nt
State of California } ss.
Couniy of San Diego
On December 5, 2003, before me, Mary Cobb, Notary Public, personally appeared John L. Hannum and John H. Craig pers6hall{, known to me o be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within thstmment, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authoriged ea'i/acities, and that by
their signatures on the instrument, the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the im;tn~ment.
Witness my hand and official seal.
Mary Cobh, Notary PuBlic
RESOLUTIONS
Ttds Power of Attorney is granted and is signed, sealed and notarized with facsimile signatures and seals under authority of the follo,Mhg ]'esolutions adopted by
the respective Boards of Directors of each of the Companies:
"RESOLVED: That the President, an Executive or Senior Vine President of the Company, together with the Secretory be aiiy Assistant
Secretary, are hereby authorized to execute Powers of Attorney appointing the person(s) named as Aitomey(s)-in-Fact to d~te: ekecute, sign,
seal, and deliver on hahaifofthe Company, fidelity and surety bonds, undertakings, and other similar contracts of suretyship; aiid any related
documents.
RESOLVED FURTHER: That the signatures of the officers mak ng the appointment, and the signature of any officer certi~,fi, ~ the validity
and current status of the appointmcmt, may be facsimile representations of those signatures; and the signature and seal of an~, i~6tary, and the
seal of the Company, may be facsimile representations of those signatures and seals, and such facsinfile representations shdfi have the same
force and effect as if manually affixed. The facsimile n:presentations refen'ed to herein may be affixed by stamping, [ni~ififi~, typing, or
photocopying."
CERTIFICATE
l, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of Insurance Company of the West, The Explorer Insurance Company, and Independence Casually arid Surety Company, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is in flail force and effect, and has not been revoked, and that the above resolutiofig Were duly adopted by the
respective Boards of Directors of the Companies, and are now in flu fi force.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand this ~ Eh day of. ~pr~.} 200~t
John H. Craig, Assistant Secretary
To verify the authenticity of this Power of Atlomey you may call 1-800-877-1111 and ask thr the Surety Division. Please refer to the P6wer iSfAttomey Number,
the above named individual(s) and dumils of the bond to which the power is attached. For information or filing claims, please contact Siil-ety Claims, ICW Group,
11455 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130~2045 or call (858) 350-2400.
TERRORISM COVERAGE DISCLOSURE
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (the "Act") establishes a pm/om under which
the Federal Government will share in the payment of covered losses caused by certain
acts of international terrorism. We are providing you with this notice to inform you of
the key features of the Act, and to let you know what effect, if any, the Act will have on
the premium.
Under the Act, insurers are required to provide coverage for certain losses caused by
international acts of terrorism as defmed in the Act. The Act further provides that the
Federal Government will pay a share of such losses. Specifically, the Federal
Government will pay 90% of the mount of covered losses caused by certain acts of
terrorism that is in excess of the statutorily established deductible for that year. The Act
also caps the amount of terror/sm-related losses for which the Federal Government or an
insurer can be responsible at $100,000,000,000.00, provided that the insurer has met its
deductible.
Please note that passage of the Act does not result in any change in coverage under the
attached policy or bond (or the policy or bond being quoted). Please also note that no
separate additional premium charge has been made for the terrorism coverage required by
the Act. The premium charge that is allocable to such coverage is inseparable from and
imbedded in the overall premium.
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Alameda SS
On Aprile 15, 2004 before me, Dianne Sievers, Notary Public
personally appeared Lewis J. Younq
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
~'~~LzL"'-'-'-'-'-'-'~A----- --DIAN ES EVERS -- "N" I------ ~ ~ h!s,,~l heir authorized capacity(ie~, and that by his/her/their
s~ n; ,(s) on the instrument th~p~rson(s), or the entity upon behalf of
._a ~_..j.~i[,~ Commission # 1323365 · icl ~ p~rson(s) acted, execu~e~ the instrument.
z ~ Natal/public - California ~
J ~,' Ssr,ta Clara County f .~ my hand and officia~
j~ "~a~ My Corem. ExDires Oct 2, 2005
~ SIGN/('TURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PARTNER(S)
LIMITED or GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S) NUMBER OF PAGES
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S( OR ENTITY(lES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
Staf:f Re rt
DA3~_: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J, O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tach II
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND AND ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16147, LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND ETIWANDA
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES, INC.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 16147 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16147, located on the on the southwest corner
of Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City
Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Pacific Crest Communities, Inc.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. BE2616854 $1,330,300,00
Accept: Maintenance Bond No. BE2616854 $ 133,030.00
Respec~,tfully submit!ed,
w,ti& J. O'Ne,
City"'Engineer
WJO:KT:dlw
Attachments
,,, WILSON 24TH, t ST.
AVE. ....
I ~ BANYAN STREET
u~ SITE ~i~
AVE.
VICTORIA AVE.
NTS " '
N
CITY OF rr~: ~'~-/- / l / d 7
]iNGII~.~-'RING DIV~ION F,X].n'mlT:
RESO,UT,O,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16147 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF: A NOTICE OF COMPLETION.FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16147 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members cf the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, CJty Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14496, LOCATED NORTH
OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,
SUBMITTED BY GRANITE HOMES.
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 14496 have been completed in an acceptable manner,
and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 14496, located north of Wilson Avenue on the
west side of Day Creek Boulevard, the applicant was required to complete street improvements.
The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release
the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Granite Homes
Release: Faithful Performance Bond No. B34226989 $333,300.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond No. B34226989 $ 33,333.00
ReslSe~ctf ully submitted
Wi~lia/m d. O'Neil
CiyEngineer
WJO:KT:dlw
Attachments
CITY
OF
ITEM: Tract
~NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: R~cho Etiw~da
ENG~EE~G DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map
.ESO' T O..O. Y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO OUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14496 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvernents for Tract 14496 have been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
I~NG1NI~I~DIN C DE DADT~I~N T
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY
AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing and approve the
Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments for Landscape
Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. It is also recommended
that there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year
2004/2005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~
It is recommended that assessment rates not be increased in any of the Landscape
Maintenance Districts for the FY 2004/2005. Recently imposed water and electricity rate
hikes continue to be mitigated by the Districts' conservation efforts, including a program
to continue computerizing the irrigation systems for the entire Districts' maintained
landscape areas. These efforts are helping to keep costs down, allowing the
assessment rate to be the same as the rates for FY 2003/2004.
Back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties in many of the districts which has
resulted in increased revenue in those districts. In some districts, an increase in the
amount of landscaped area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of
maintenance and operations costs. This cost will be offset by an increase in revenue
received from new developments in the district. In past years, any available prior year
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 19, 2004
Page 2
carry over was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue
requirements. This remains the case in some districts and has allowed the assessment
rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports,
identifies proposed FY 2004/2005 rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required
budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates.
The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports
for the Landscaping Maintenance Districts with the recommendation to Council to adopt
the reports keeping assessment rates at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year.
A tax delinquency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated
delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds
within the district can be added to the district's fund balance.
Assessment Rate
Landscape Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit
LMD # 1 - General City $ 92.21
LMD # 2 - Victoria Planned Community $422.00
LMD # 3A - Hyssop $413.74
LMD # 3B -Commercial/Industrial $352.80
LMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50
LMD # 5- Tot Lot $113.29
LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community $246.97
LMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $307.05
LMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $151.45
LMD # 9 - Lower Etiwanda $375.91
LMD # 10 - Rancho Eiiwanda $597.09
Respectfully Submitted, ,.~
Williad~-/J. O Nell
City Engineer
W JO:MT
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of
March, 2003, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 03-062 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10
which Resolution of Intention No. 03-062 was duly and legally published in the time, form and
manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention
on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity
for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having
now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION I: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and
10 for the Fiscal Year 2004/2005, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth
and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 03-062, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2004/2005 are
hereby approved.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY
AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing and approve the Resolution
authorizing the levy and collection of assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in
assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the
assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended
to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the
actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts maintain the
increased expenditure levels that were instituted by the City last fiscal year as a
response to the record-high Southern California Edison electric rate increases approved
by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in 2001. Although wholesale
electricity generation prices have dropped dramatically since California's electricity crisis
has subsided, the CPUC projects that the increased rates may remain in effect through
Fiscal year 2004/2005.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 19, 2004
Page 2
in the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments
within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY
2004/2005 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in
conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2004/2005
rates that are recommended to remain the same as FY 2003/04 rates.
The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports
for the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts with the recommendation to Council to
adopt the reports keeping assessment rates at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal
year.
The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows:
Street Lighting Maintenance District Assessment Rate per Assessment Unit
SLMD #1 - Arterial $17.77
SLMD #2 - General City Local $39.97
SLMD #3 - Victoria Planned Community $47.15
SLMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96
SLMD #5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60
SLMD #6 - Commercial/Industrial $51.40
SLMD #7 - North Etiwanda $33.32
SLMD #8 - South Etiwanda $193.75'
*This rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of
street lights to assessment units.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi~q'/J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:MT
Attachments
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLI.ECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of
March, 2004, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 03-064 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which
Resolution of Intention No. 03-064 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as
required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the
Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become
part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The
normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient
non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs
of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street
lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be
based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's
rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program of the district.
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the
contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the
Fiscal Year 2004/2005, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described
in said Resolution of Intention No. 03-064, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2004/2005 are
hereby approved.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA
]~ NC IN E El~ I N G D E PAl~ TMI~N T
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM. William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY
AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS
PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the attached
Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments within Park and
Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. It is also
recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in this district for Fiscal
Year 2004/2005.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~
This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance
the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage
Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre
facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill
Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road
and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the
Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85
May 19, 2004
Page 2
The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports
for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 with the recommendation
to Council that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for fiscal year
2004/2005. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule:
Definition Assessment per Parcel
Single Family Residential $52.00
Less than 1.50 acres $26.00
1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $78.00
3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $182.00
7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00
14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00
25.01 acres and Larger $1,300.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
W JO:MT
Attachment
NO. d' /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND
RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85
(HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of
March, 2004, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 03-066 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No.
03-066 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by
the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the
contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 2004/2005, and
said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No. 03-066 be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2004/2005 are
hereby approved.
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RAN ClIO C U CAM ONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the
zone from Community Commercial to Mixed Use for a .7 acre portion of Subarea 3
of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located north of Foothill Boulevard, between
Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-151-20 thru 23. Related Files:
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree
Removal Permit DRC2004- 00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached
Ordinance approving the Development District Amendment and the issuance of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved several applications on April 14, 2004,
to establish a requested Master Plan, Tract Map, and architectural plans for the development of
18 single-family detached condominiums fronting San Bernardino Road and 138 attached
condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping on the balance
of the property. A copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and minutes are attached for
reference (Exhibit "B"). As a mid-block in-fill project, this development has had a number of
significant challenges, which include relating to the Foothill Boulevard improvement
requirements on the south, while responding to the different surrounding land uses including
single-family detached homes to the north, commercial property to the east, and a mobile home
community to the west. The applicant has responded by using single-family detached units
along the San Bernardino Road (north side) frontage and extensive landscape setbacks on the
other three sides, in addition to providing multiple pedestrian connections to the Foothill
Boulevard frontage for strong linkage to adjacent commercial properties. Access to the site is
provided via gated driveways on Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road.
Additionally, the internal motor court design is reminiscent of the Route 66 Motor Courts
historically found along Foothill Boulevard in the past. The proposed development has
incorporated all of the City's recommended design criteria.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES
May 19, 2004
Page 2
ANALYSIS: A small, .7-acre portion of the 12.74-acre site, is being rezoned in conformance
with the Mixed Use Designation of the General Plan. The zone change is necessary in order to
make the project consistent with the adopted General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: On the basis of the Initial Study, the issuance of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is recommended.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site. A letter of support was received from Nell G. Surati
(the owner of a pre-school daycare facility, located at 9575 San Bernardino Road), and is
attached for reference (Exhibit "C").
City Planner
BB:LH/jm
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Development District Amendment Site Layout
Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes, dated April 14, 2004
Exhibit "C" Correspondence from Neil G. Surati
Draft Ordinance Approving Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037
L~N~
RESlDEN~AL gO~ MERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC
LR LOW DENSI~ RESIDENTIAL MU MIXED U8~ U UTILI~
SC SPEOIAL~ OO~ERClAL
O OFFICE p PUBLIC
~R LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL CC COMMUN~Y COMMERCIAL
CO COMMERCIAUOFFICE ---- ~STER P~N AREA
MR MEOIUM RESIDENTIAL RR6 RECITAL RE~TED COMMERCIAL
MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL INDUGTRIAL
SITE MAP FOR LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DRC2~-0] 037 (DDA)
DEVELOPME~ DISTRICT AMENDMENT LAND USE PLAN
THE CITY OF
I~ANC[IO C UCAH 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: April 14, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change
the zone from Community Commercial to Mixed Use for a .7 acre portion of
Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located north of Foothill Boulevard,
between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-151-20 thru 23. Related
Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development Review
DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of
Interest DRC2004-00105.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT16567 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12.74 net acres of
land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots for the development of 18 single-family
detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums with common
recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed Use District
of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San
Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues
APN: 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14,
and 19 thru 23. Related Files: Development District Amendment
DRC2003-01037, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit
DRC2004-00105, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2003-01036 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop
18 single-family detached condominiums fronting San Bernardino Road and 138
attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area
landscaping on 12.74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 3)
of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San
Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues
APN: 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14,
and 19 thru 23. Related Files: Development District Amendment
DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Tree Removal Permit
DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES
April14,2004
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT: A small, .7-acre portion of the site, is being rezoned
in conformance with the Mixed Use designation of the General Plan. The zone change is
necessary to make the project consistent with the adopted General Plan (Exhibit "A") and
consistent with the land use of the majority of this block. The Mixed Use District allows
residential development.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: 12.24 dwelling units per acre.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
NoAh - San Bernardino Road and Single-family Detached/Low Density Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre)
South - Foothill Boulevard and Retail Commercial/Community Commercial
East Commercial and Office/Community Commercial and Mixed Use
West Mobile Home Park and Single-family Residential/Mixed Use
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Mixed use and Community Commercial
North - Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - General Commercial
East Mixed Use
West Mixed Use
D. Site Characteristics: The site is composed of several existing parcels with only 11 of the
13 parcels that front on Foothill Boulevard that are occupied by older single-family
residences and some converted commercial and office uses. Most of the site is vacant
and has not been used for many years. The site has frontage on both San Bernardino
Road and Foothill Boulevard and gently slopes from noah to south at approximately
2 percent. There are several scattered mature trees that are in various stages of decline.
E. Parkinq Calculations:
Number of Number of
Square Parking Spaces Spaces
Type of Use Footaqe Ratio Required .Provided
18 Single-Family Plan 1 - 2,543 2.38 36 Garages 36 Garages
Detached Plan 2 - 2,858 5 Open 7 Open
138 Townhouse Plan 1 - 1,355 2.41 279 Garage 284 Garage
Condominiums up to 34 Open 49 Open
Plan 5 - 1,681
Total 354 376
22/
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567 - JOHN LAING HOMES
April 14, 2004
Page 3
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The Planning Commission conducted a Pre-Application Review workshop on
this project on June 11, 2003, and August 13, 2003. As a mid block in-fill project, this
development has had a number of significant challenges. The challenges include relating
to the Foothill Boulevard Improvement requirements on the south, while responding to the
different surrounding land uses including single-family detached homes to the north,
commercial to the east, and a mobile home community to the west. The applicant has
responded by using single-family detached units along the San Bernardino Road (north
side) frontage as a transition of density and extensive landscape setbacks on the other
three sides, in addition to providing multiple pedestrian connections to the Foothill
Boulevard frontage for strong linkage to adjacent commercial properties. Access to the
site is provided via gated driveways on Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardino Road.
Also, the internal motor court design is reminiscent of the Route 66 Motor Courts
historically found along Foothill Boulevard in the past. The proposed development has
incorporated all of the City's recommended design criteria.
B. Tract Map and Project Design: The following factors are noted about the Project:
· The Commission's policy on 360-degree architecture has been adequately
addressed, particularly on the most publicly visible units.
· Total open space provided at 53 percent exceeds 45 percent required at this density.
· Landscaping is adequate with a total of 588 trees proposed and 585 required. In
addition, 20 percent of the trees are 24-inch or larger.
· Because the applicant is providing a standard two-car garage per dwelling unit, there
are 5 garage spaces provided above the minimum requirement and, in addition,
there are 8 open parking spaces above the minimum requirement. The open
parking spaces appear to be reasonably distributed throughout the development with
33 spaces on the west side and 32 spaces on the east side. There are 22 extra
parking spaces above minimum Code requirements.
C. Master Plan: The Master Plan is provided for under Section 17.32.020 Foothill Boulevard
Districts of the Development Code and is required as part of the Mixed Use District. The
previously referenced section states in part: ... "Each Mixed-Use/Retail site shall provide a
master plan illustrating land use, site planning, circulation, access, and overall
architectural and landscape architectural design concepts (see Section 17.32.030 - Use
Regulations)." See Exhibit "B" attached for reference.
D. Neiqhborhood Meetinq: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 14, 2004,
which was well attended and generated a good discussion on the design and the concerns
of the neighborhood. A copy of the meeting minutes is attached for reference (Exhibit
"H"). During the meeting, the installation of a traffic signal at San Bernardino Road and
Archibald Avenue was requested. This request will be fulfilled by the applicant in
exchange for a Transportation Facility Fee credit.
,22
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES
April14,2004
Page 4
E. Design Review Committee: On March 2, 2004, the DRC Committee (McPhail, Stewart,
Fong) unanimously recommended approval of the project noting that there were only a
few minor issues to consider and that the overall project was appropriate for the Mixed
Use concept. A copy of the DRC action is attached for reference (Exhibit "i").
F. Technical Review Committee: On March 2, 2004, the TRC met and recommended
moving forward subject to the conditions attached to the Resolutions of Approval.
G. Environmental Assessment: On the basis of the Initial Study, a Negative Declaration is
recommended for Certification.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site. A letter of support from Neil G.Surati (Owner of
Property at 9575 San Bernardino Road, a pre-school day care facility) was been received and is
attached (Exhibit "J").
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Master
Plan by minute action and all other applications by adoption of the attached Resolutions.
City Planner
BB:LH\ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Development District Amendment Site Layout
Exhibit "B" - Master Plan and Development Plans (Provided under separate cover)
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Detail Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Master Plan
Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans and Building Elevations
Exhibit "H" - January 14, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting Minutes
Exhibit "1" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated March 2, 2004
Exhibit "J" - Letter of Support from Neil G. Surati
Exhibit"K" ~ Building Square Footage Summary
Exhibit "L" - Initial Study Parts I and II
Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Distdct Amendment DRC2003-01037
Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567
Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01036
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL COM NIERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC
LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MU MIXED USE U UTILITY
SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC
CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
MR MEDIUM RESIDENT~AL CO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE m ~ MASTER PLAN AREA
RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL
MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL ~
SITE MAP FOR U LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DRC2003-01037 (DDA)
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT LAND USE PLAN
Master Plan and Development Plans
Provided Under Separate Cover
EXHIBIT "B"
225-
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16567
MAP -. ~ ~ ~ .~
L.-..-2~-~y ~'
J5714-1715~tentative[TEN~R16567-S1-S2.dwa UTIt 17ATION 03/24/200409:06:45AM,
~ FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
~ ~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16567
',, ' to rsr crrr o., mmcso CUC~MONGA
, . ~, ,
;'"""; %
................ [ . .
, ,r ,.:::,
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16567
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16567
(:0 HCI;PTU.flL lIT. I; PLO H LOVOUT ~ ~.~?
(OH(I;PTUflL IL. CY,qTIOH ,qLOH~ .[:OOTIIILL.bO U L~IIIID ...........,.~_~-
(OIt(,CPTUIIL.CL.C¥1ITIOH flLOH~ ~qH .DCIIH.flADIItO AOfl~
-
Second Floor PI~ First Floor Plan Second Floor PI~ Fimt Floor Plan
Plan 2 - 13~ s.[ Plan I - 1355 s.[
~ UNIT PLANS
~'~ M A I N S T R E E T ~ A-~
'~ ~ ~ ~.~, .... s,~,. s,~. ,oo A T R O U T E 6 6.I~
Jolml~, Hones (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUBTT~I6567 DRC2003-01036
,,.~,.~, .... Rancho Cucamonga, California
Se~loor Plan ·
F--'--~---'~ / ~ I --
O O I~
First Floor Pl~ ' ~r*'~ leq' ~'~-- S*cond Floor Pl~ First Floor Plan
Plan 4 - 1334 s.f. Plan 3 - 1360 s.£
UNIT PLANS
MAIN STREET {~ A-2
~ ~l~ 25SE. Ri .... s,r¢c,, s,. ,o0 AT ROUTE 66~ -- KTG~y mOl.,IP ....
Second Floor Plan Second Floor Plan
First Floor Plan First Floor Plan
Plan 4-B - 1439 s.[ Plan 4A - 1334 s.f.
UNIT PLANS
MAIN STREET _~ A-3
.... ~,,.,~ Rancho Cucamonsa, California ~,~..: · -
Second Floor Plan Plan 5 - 1681 s.f. First Floor Plan
UNIT PLANS
M A I NR O uS T R E E TT E 6 6 ~ ~.T.~-V..~RCX~.~.,'~:.A'4
255 E. Ri .... Stree,, S,c. ~00 A T
Corona, California 92879-1330 a
Plan I
First Floor Plan
I0- PLEX BUILDING
M A I N S T R E E T ~ ^-s
Corona, California 92879-1330
Rancho Cucamonga, California ~"-'~' ~'~'~
Second Floor Plan
10-PLEX BUILDING
2~ E. Ri ....S,ree,. S,e. ~00 A T R O U T E 6 6 O~X.~o~,:..~ ....
Corona, California 92879-1330
(9091272-5100 FAX(909) 738-9454 R a n c h 0 C u c a m 0 n g a, C a I i f 0 r n i a i~'g" ':::=~"g'~
Roof Plan Elevation 'A'
10- PLEX BUILDING
Corona, Ca]ifornia 92879-1330
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Key Notes:
Front Elevation (~) ,.,,,~,a,-.,~
Side Elevation
Rear Elevation
10-PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "A"
MAIN STREET
~ 255E. Ri .... S,£eet, Ste. 100 AT ROUTE 66 O[.T.~.v,...mc~,~.,..,:'
Corona, California 92879-1330
Key Notes:
Courtyard Elevation (~)
Rear Cour~ard Elevation
~Fr~o.n~[..?.,.ourtyard Elevation
~ 10-PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION 'A"
~ ~ M A I N S T R E E T ~ ~i~' A-9
2s~ ~.~i .... s,,c~,, s~. ~oo A T R O U T E 6 6 ~X.~o~,.,~,
b~m~s (909) 272-5100 F~(909)738-9454 R ~ ~ ~ h 0 C ~ ~ ~ m 0 n g ~, C 8 I i f 0 r ~ i 8
Roof Plan Elevation 'B'
~ 10- PLEX BUILDING
~ MAIN STREET .~ ....... 3. .....A-10 A ....
255 E.P.i .... Streeh $t¢. I00 A T R O U T E 6 6 ~I
,,.~ ..... Rancho C ucamo n ga, California
Front Elevation (~)
Side Elevation
Rear Elevation
10-PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "B"
MAIN STREET ~ A-11
255 E. Ri .... Streeg Sic. '00 A T R O U T E 6 6 --~.T~Z~...~:,
Corona, California 92879-1330
(909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 8U~16567 DRC2003-01036
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Key Notes:
Courtyard Elevation (~) ~'~'~,
Rear Courtyard Elevation
Fro,~, n~.t.. ,C..our tyard Elevation
10-PLEX BUILDINO ELEVATION "B"
MAIN S T R E ET ~ A-12
255 n. RinconStreet, Ste. 100 AT R O U T E 66 ~KTGY~
(909)272-5100 FAX(909) 738-9454 ~ a n e h o C u c a m o n g a, C a I i f o r n i a ~'~ '=~
12 pl~ bnildins:
nuildins toUl: 2~9S f~.
First Floor Plan
~ 12- PLEX BUILDING
.~ ~ MAIN STREET~ ~ A-m3
255 E. Ri ....Str~¢t, St~. 100 A T R O U T E 6 6
,L~-,~ Rancho Cu camon g a, California
Second Floor Plan
12- PLEX BUILDING
MAIN STREET~ V A-14
25~E..~.~o.s.c~,.stc.~oo A T R O U T E 6 6 '~.v....mo~..:.~
Corona, California 92879-1330
Roof Plan Elevation 'A'
12- PLEX BUILDING
M A I N S T R E E T ~ A-15
~255 E. Ri .... Slreet, Ste. 100 A T R O U T E 6 6 ~..T:9~.~!~
Corona, California 92879-1330
Homes (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUBTT#16567 DRC2003-01036 ' ~ ~:,,.,.:,,,,g~;~,~
,~,.....~ Rancho Cucamonga, California
Key Notes:
Front Elevation
e ® ;2=7
Side Elevation
Rear Elevation
12-PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "A" ~*~"~"""
MAIN STREET .~~ ": '~': :",~: A-I6
255 E. Ri ....
Street, S,~. ~00 A T R O U T E 6 6
8UB~16567 DRC2003-01036
(909) 272-5100 F~(909)738-9454 R a
Key Notes:
Courtyard Elevation (~) ~ v,~
Rear Courtyard Elevation
Front Courtyard Elevation
12-PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION 'A'~
M A I N S T R E E T A-17
255 E. Ri .... Street, s,,. ,0o A T R O U T
E
6
6
Corona, California 92879-1330 ~
Rancho Cucamonga, California ~'-~ -~ '~'am
Roof Plan Elevation'B'
12-PLEX BUILDING
:~SE. Ri .... s~,~t,s~e.~0o A T R O U T E 6 6
Corona, California 92879-1330
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Key Notes:
Front Elevation
Side Elevation
~ Re~,~a~r ~!~vation
255 E. Rincon Strcet, Ste. I00 A T R O U T E 6 6
,,.~,.~, .... Rancho C ucam on ga, California ~:" '-~"~
Key Notes:
Right Courtyard Elevation (~) w~,r~m
Rear Courtyard Elevation
~F~r~o n~ t~ .C,.~ u r ty ar d Elevation
12~ PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "B"
255 E. Rin¢on Street, Sic. 100 AMAINT S T R E E T ~ A-20
R O U T E 6 6 ~.'r.,~ou~ ....
Corona, California 92879-1330 ~
COMMUNITY & POOL BUILDING
M A I N S T R E E T ~ ^-21
2~SE. Ri .... S,re~l,S,e. ~00 A T R O U T E 6 6 oK'r~.v,,~aou~
California 92879-1330
(909)272-~100 F~(909)73g-9454 R a n c h 0 C u c a m 0 n g a, C a I i f 0 r n i a ~ .... '~
....... , ................ ~- Key Notes:
I ~:',:',,::,:%,,',,',:,?::,?,',,',:,?::,'
Roof ~lan ...........
',',",":'?,':", ',":';",':",',",":':",':",',',,',?;,',,,, ,v,,,, ~ ~
Pool Side Elevation
Street / Right Elevation Rear Elevation
~ CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS COMMUNITY BUILDING
~ ,,, E.,.,,,,o,, s,,.,,,,,, s,,. ,oo A T R 0 U T E 6 6 O~j,...o~,..,...,.._____
Corona, California 92879-1330
SUB.F#16567 DR(~2003-01036 ' .~%~ ":,n ~ [}.~,~
blmL*tngHomes (909) 272-5100 FAX(909) 738-9454 R a n c h o C u ¢ a m o n g a, C a I i f o r n t a
Key Notes:
Roof Plan Right Elevation - J Plaza Elevation
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: _®
Slxeet / Rear Elevation Pool Side Elevation
~ CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS POOL BUILDING
.~ ~ MAIN STREET~ A-23
255 E. Ri .... Street, Sic. 100 A T R O U T E 6 6
Corona, California 92879-1330
~ · He, at, (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUBTT#16567 DRC2003-01036
~,~,~, ..... Rancho Gu camon ga, California ~'~
~~,v Key Notes:
i..:.~..:::.:..:.:.:..:~:..::~::::.:.:..:.:..::...:..::..:..:.:..::...:..:.:~:...~.:..:.~.:.....~...~? ® O®
'" ~",'"i::' F',",'";,':'7',"',",'";,':'? '"' '"":':
Plan 1 Elevation A - Ranch
-®
Plan 1 Elevation B - Americana
Plan 1 Elevation C - Craftsman
~ CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN l
~ THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-24
JehnL~tngHomes (909) 272-5100 FAX(909) 738-9454 R
Study /
ODtional Bdrm 4
CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN I - 2250 s.f.
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-25
A T R 0 U T E 6 6
n c h o C u c a m o n g a, C a I i f o r n i a
Left Elevation "A" Roof Plan
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN I-"A"
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-26
~.~i .... s,,~,,s~. 1oo A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ ~.T.~X.~o?...~:,
Corona, California 92879-1330 ~
Left Elevation "B" Roof Plan
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 -"B"
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-27
~,~ ~ 2SSE. R~ .... S,r~¢~,S,c.,o0 A T R O U T E 6 6
Corona, California 92879-1330
}olin H~nxes (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUBTT#I6567 DRC2003-01036
.~.i~.~,..~ Rancho Cucamon g a, California
Left Elevation "C" Roof Plan
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN I -"C"
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-28
Corona, California 92879-1330 A
(909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUB'F'F#16567 DRC2003-01036
R a n c h o C u ¢ a m o n
Key Notes:
Plan 2 Elevation A - Ranch @
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~
~,~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~l~lg
Plan 2 El~at~ O - Orafts~n
~ CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2
~ THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-29
f~ ~ ~.~.~ .... s,,.,.s,e.,oo A T R O U T E 6 6
,,~,,~,~,~ Rancho Cucam o n 8 a, California
$ ~droom 5
Porch ~ Porgh
CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 - 2458 s.£
2. E.R~ .... S,,cc,, S.. ~00 THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-30
A T R O U T E 6 6
Corona, California 92879-1330 ~k .I~,.T.,~,,.Y~o.~C-~O.I~,~id,~~
R a n c h o C u c a m o n g a, C a I i f o r n i a ~,~'-' '~'.~.a.~
Left Elevation "A" Root' Plan
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2 -"A"
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-3~
~ ~.~i~o. s,,.~, s.. Ioo A T R
O
U
T
E
6
6
Corona, California 92879-1330
R a n o h o C u c a m o n i a, C a 1 i f o r n t a ~ ~'~
Left Elevation "B" Roof Plan
; I*-*---*----* t ...... ............
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2-"B"
THE BUNGALOWS I~ A-32
255E. Rincon S,rcet, Sic. 100 A T R O U T E 6 6 .~ ~.t~y..~C~..:.,::,
Corona, California 92879-1330 A
(909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUBTT#I6567 DRC2003-01036
Rancho Cucamonga, California ~:--- ,am.ava
Elevation "C" Roof Plan
Right Elevation Drive Elevation
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2-"C"
THE BUNGALOWS ~ A-33
2~SE. Ri .... s,,.,.s..~oo A T R O U T E 6 6
Eoro... c.,.or~,. ~.,.o O ~,:~~~,x~o~ .....
(909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 SUB~16567 DRC2003-01036
Main Street at Route 66
DRC2003-01036 ' sUBTT16567
Community Meeting held 3anum3r 14, 2004
~oti _. - -, · ,- ~'-,~,~i~4on nofificaUon area ~.~, .,,...
i.~di~ated that thay aid not receive the invitation and anived to tho m~ag by word-of-
moulh. We advised that all who wanted to ~asore ~7~ipt of fulxtre notices, to sign
sig~-in sheet. Upon arcss-checki~ h'~ sign. in list with labels used for the ~ all but
two of those wao said daey ,,did. not ~ceivc an ~ ,t~ion had b~a seat one by r~galax U,S.
.Mail (lnvita:iv~s were mailed on D~~nb~r 22 .)
Al~:endeas:
1. Commuxity attendees per lhe attached sign-in sheet.
2. lohn Laiag He.mas
a. 'fire l~I~S, Vice presid~nI
b. l~onda Hecly, Senior Project Ma,~ger
¢. List. Bass, Projectlvianag~r
d. Grcgg Fotmr, Director of Land A~luisiti~.~oup (Land Planner)
3. Terry Galloway, President: of Thc Galloway
4. DaW K~lt, ptincipal, slid Charles A~-elinffloll' pl'ojecl D~sig~er, of KTGY
C-roup, Inc. (~-rchi+,ect)
Spaoth, '?rojeet Manager, of Madole & Associates, Inc. (Civil Engineer)
5, YreL '
6. 3_~id~r~ 'iCa~xwied~, President of Axchit~nxa Design G-rolxp (Lan&scape
~re~e~tatiq~:
I. ~.. 'Ncel} weleom~'d the ~ommtmity and introdue~ the Laing team. Shc
rextu~teC thax everyone sign in ffthey had not already done so.
Il. IL ;N'~ly provided an mtitlemmt history of the project in~luding:
a. pr,~'ivus devdoper proposed affordable multi-family for rent housing; the
cnrrnaunity objected lo this proposal
b. Laing is proposing single f_~mily attach~l and detached for sale housing;
In re.:pouse to previous meetings, support has been expressed by the day
care owner, the owner of Mobile Manor, and members of the community
tc i,~e north. Laing has incorporated the followin~ dmnges due
com::aunity requests:
L Th~ project has be~ gated to vehicular traffic to prevent through
truffle fxom Foothill Blvd.,
~i. The northern project entry was relocated to align with
vs. Layton
iii.. Pedestrian aec, ess was maintained to facilitate a~cess to
commercial use~ on l~ootlill Blvd.
i~'. Single family detached homes were inlxoduced along San
Bemarai-o Road as a buffer to existing re~idea~ to the north.
v. A block wall has be~n incnrporated on the eastern and western
project perimeters.
c. A fz,rmal application was made to the City in December 2003
d..k s piing pl,n,~ing Commission hearing is a~ficipatcd
21,:9: ~00~ ~ qaj
~ Power' Poi~ Presentation
i. ~ N~Iy ~ s~dcs d~ic~
~s w~ ~ a ~il~ ~to~ ~ome
· ~pos~. A ~ of a ~ ~ ~n-pmfit
for ~ w~ ~ ~hi~ ~
iL T. ~ow~y ~t~ sfi~ of ~e ~ific ~j~ p~o~
mcl~g ~ ~, ~ M~ P~ ~s~s~o~ of
d~ of ~ ~d p~
Qu~Rons ~d ~
but ~::~ ~W catego~) ~om
~ no~ ~d~ ~ be a word-for-wo~ ~pt'
b. ~u~fion: ~ ~'t ~
~d S~ B~~;an
~ R~,o~e: '~e Ci~ ~in~ ~c n~ for ~ese ~ of
~v~g ~d ~ ~gon o~ pmj~
~y. ~
~fion: "~y ~n'i you p~ a b~
Bo~e~d so ~ p~plc ~ ~ lcfl-~ ~ ~to
Ci~ for ~ r~c
,~ ~. ~."
~:s~on: "~ve you ~
l~:~e: '~. We r~i~ le~
~o~ ~ ~ ~ r~ m pay ~-~ted
gh~l f~s."
~[;~0n: "How ~ you go~
~}po~o: "~ of o~ homes
' we ~vc ~c~
~j~. ~, we ~ ~ ~ S~ B~
~ to im ~ ~t~f-way. Howcv~, ~hls is a
pubic m~ ~d
apply."
2
ram't we have both of your a~eesses on
Boulevard? The previous proposal had the n~ain aeces~
: on Foo~illY
l~.espons~: , '~B~se there would not be enough spacing between
the two entries. Also, the pzca4ous proposal was for
want a s~gle access on a busy
aF~,iments' Apa~nents avpwPfiat¢ for a for-sale
st~t for advvai$ing. It is
residential cou~unity to have two convenient safe
! Question: don't you move you~ northern access to line up
was ou~ ozlgi~sl design bui we relocated ix to its
R~poaS¢: cunent location due to strong community goncem about
lining up oUr ~ with Layton which is a thro%~h
Queo, uon: "How tall is the wall between Laing and the mobile
Rcsponsc: "Typically eight fcet or less composed of a six foot
garden wall on top of a two foot re~_;i,~ing wall. Tiffs
height is excelled for a sho~i distance on both thc
~.,e~tion: '~Do you have any historic sW~...~u,~,~ on site :.
"There are ~o structur*s which quar_ffT,,,for eitl~r state or
R .~nse: I na~onal ~egistry as historic stn~tures.
Overall th~ at~lienc~ Liked the project and appreciated the lower dea~sity of this proposal
~nd. tl~ fac~ :l~t wc responded to their earlier concerns. They valued the ~iu~e story
buffer a~d :~'~y ~sideraz expressed a desire t~ appear at the pl_.~-~$ Commi~ion
hemng in support.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m. Larry Henderson March 2, 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 - JOHN LAING
HOMES - A request to subdivide 12.74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots
related to develop 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums with
common recreation facility, common area landscaping, within the Mixed Use District of the Foothill
Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, and between
Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38; and
208-151-07, 14, and 23 thru 29. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-01036, Development
District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01035, and Historic Point of
Interest DRC2004-00105.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2003-01036 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to develop 18 single-family detached
condominiums facing San Bernardino Road, and 138 attached condominiums with common
recreation facility, common area landscaping, on 12.74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use
District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardino
Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31,33, 34,
35, 37, and 38; and 0208-151-07, 14, and 23 thru 29. Related File: Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT16567, Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tree Removal Permit
DRC2003-01035, and Histodc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105.
Background: The Planning Commission reviewed a Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00503 on
June 11, 2003, and again on August 13, 2003 (Exhibit "A"). A neighborhood meeting was
conducted by the developer on January 14, 2004. Since then, the developer has been working
closely with staff to address Commission and neighborhood concerns.
Master Plan: Pursuant to the City Requirements for the Mixed Use Designation, the applicant has
submitted a Master Plan which provides an illustrative Land Use Plan for the entire block and a
conceptual design features and development standards for the specific residential project that is
proposed. Subject to the DRC recommendations, staff is supportive of the overall concepts and
development standards as shown in the Master Plan.
Desiqn Parameters: As a mid block in-fill project, this development has had a number of significant
challenges. The challenges include relating to the Foothill Boulevard Improvement requirements on
the south, while responding to the different surrounding land uses including single-family detached
homes to the north, commercial to the east, and a mobile home community to the west. The
applicant has responded by using single-family detached units along the San Bemardino Road
(north side) frontage and extensive landscape setbacks on the other three sides, in addition to
providing multiple pedestrian connections to the Foothill Boulevard frontage for strong linkage to
adjacent commercial properties. Access to the site is provided via gated driveways on Foothill
Boulevard and San Bemardino Road.
Also, the intemal motor court design is reminiscent of the Route 66 Motor Courts historically found
along Foothill Boulevard in the past. The proposed development has incorporated all of the City's
recommended design cfiteda and, therefore, there are no outstanding major issues or policy
questions identified herein.
DRC ACTION COMMENTS
SUBTT16567 AND DRC2003-01039- JOHN LAING HOMES
March 2, 2004
Page 2
Other noteworthy details include the following:
1. Architecture: It appears that the Commission's policy on 360-degree architecture has been
adequately addressed, particularly on the most publicly visible units.
2. Total open space provided at 53 percent exceeds 45 percent required at this density.
3. Landscaping appears adequate with a total of 588 trees proposed and 585 required. Twenty
percent of the trees are 24-inch or larger.
4. Parking: Because the applicant is providing a standard two-car garage per dwelling unit, there
are five garage spaces provided above the minimum requirement and, in addition, there are
eight open parking spaces above the minimum requirement. The open parking spaces
appears to be reasonably distributed throughout the development with 33 spaces on the west
side and 32 spaces on the east side. There are 22 extra parking spaces above minimum
Code requirements.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: All major issues were addressed subsequent to the previous Pre-Application Review
conducted by the Planning Commission in 2003.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Site Plan - The Committee should review the proposed building setbacks along the project
boundary, particularly in relation to the adjoining mobile homes. The two-story multi-family
buildings propose setbacks varying from 19.9 feet (one third) to 29.9 feet (two thirds). The
minimum setback required is 20 feet. Note: in the areas with 19.9 feet setback (which include
private patio areas), no trees are provided as a buffer. At a minimum, staffwould recommend
a continuous buffer of the Podocarpus evergreen trees along the project boundary.
2. Motor Court - The Development Code requires a minimum of 24 feet wide ddveway access
for two-way traffic; whereas, only 20 feet is proposed in the "neck". The provision of the
required 24-foot wide ddveway with vine pockets only is acceptable.
3. Recreation Amenities- A total of five are required; however, the Development Code stipulates
the Planning Commission shall determine the number and locations of multiple tot lots for this
size project, whereas, the project only has one, and the applicant has proposed the Rose
Garden and Gazebo instead of an additional Tot Lot. The amenities shown are well designed.
4. Mailboxes - None are shown on plans for multi-family area. The preferred option is a
centralized mailbox within community building. Alternatively, gang mailboxes designed into
architectural structures (e.g., trellis) may be located throughout project.
5. Foothill Boulevard Landscaping - The following elements should be provided consistent with
the Suburban Parkway design of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan:
DRC ACTION COMMENTS
SUBTT16567 AND DRC2003-01039 - JOHN LAING HOMES
March 2, 2004
Page 3
· In addition to London Plane trees, the informal tree clusters should include California
Sycamore, and Purple Plum. Rhus Lancea is no longer the desired tree species in the
parkway.
· There should be greater meander in the public sidewalk, except where the right-turn lane
is located. This may necessitate sidewalk easement, slope changes and/or retaining
walls. The intent was for the sidewalk to meander within a 16-foot parkway (not 13 feet
as proposed).
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Xeriscape principles should be incorporated into landscape and irrigation design.
2. Air conditioning units located outside private patios should be screened by shrubs.
3. Ali stone veneer should extend below ground surface.
Desi.qn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Larry Henderson
The Committee recommended approval based on the applicant's response letter dated March 1,
2004, and with the additional following conditions:
1. The split rail wood fence be substituted with concrete rails.
2. All wood gates have metal f~ames as verbally indicate by the al~plicant.
Nell G. Surati (Gen. Manager)
1225 W. Beale Street
February 9, 2004 FEI 1 2004
JOHN IAI~G HOMES
INLAND DIVISION
To: Thc Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
R~ncho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Sub.: Proposed Tentative Tract 16567
Main Street at Route 66
Honorable Commissioner(s):
I am the US Citizen and the resident of State of Arizona. I own a Mixed used rental property in the city of
Rancho Cucamunga at 95?5 San Bemardino Road (parcel number: 02 08 151050000). My property is a
preschool and day care facility run by a private California citizen family members on a lease contract
basis. My property is in the neighborhood of the above-mentioned Tract No. ]6567. A private
development company, John Laing Homes, is planning to build and develop 156 single family homes on
this tract which is about 13.02 acres of mixed-use land.
This developer has noticed property owner's within the vicinity of their project regarding their proposal.
I received a letter and knew about this very nice proposal and also, I personally visited the developer's
office to see the whole project. ] was really impressed to see this project. There will be a very good
outcome from this project and ] believe it will be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community. I
strongly express my support as one of the neighborhood real estate property owners.
Thank you very much for considering my opinion as one of the property owners in making your decision.
I wish good luck to every individual party and department for the success of this beautiful project.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 928 - ?53 - 3881.
Neil G. Sumti
Main Street at Route 66
Rancho Cucamonga
DRC200301036 SUBTT16567
March 22, 2004
BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
Bungalows: S.F. DU Total S.F;
Plan 1 2,143 9 19,287
Plan 2 2,458 9 22,122
Total Bungalow S.F. 41,409
Motorcourts:
10-Plex
Plan 1 1,355 2 2,710
Plan 2 1,364 2 2,728
Plan 3 1,360 2 2,720
Plan 4 1,334 2 2,668
Plan 5 1,681 2 3,362
14,188
x 9 buildings
Total 10-Plex Sq. Footage: 127,692
12-Plex
Plan 1 1,355 2 2,710
Plan 2 1,364 2 2,728
Plan 3 1,360 2 2,720
Plan 4 1,334 2 2,668
Plan 5 1,681 4 6,724
17,550
x 4 buildings
Total 12-Plex Sq. Footage: 70,200
Total Motorcourt S.F. 197,892
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL S.F. 239,301
CLUBHOUSE S.F. 1,979
POOL BUILDING S.F. 650
E IRONMENTAL
....INFORMATION FORM
--'- (Part I - Initial Study)
City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink, Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.)
Planning Division
(909) 477-2750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and
Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and
Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this
application be provided in full.
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NO T BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing
information.
Application Numberfortheprojec, ,o which this formpertains: /~;~. /~I.C']Z' /~"7 ;
Project Title: Main Street ~ Route 66
Name & Address of project owner(s):
See a~ached
Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: WL Homes LLC dba John Laing Homes
255 E. Rincon Street, Suite 100
Corona, CA 92879-1330
Contact Person & Address: Rhonda Neel¥ - Project Manager - John Laing Homes
255 E. Rincon Street, Suite 100
Corona, CA 92879-1330
Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above):
Lisa Bass - Project Coordinator - John Laing Homes
255 E. Rincon Street, Suite 100
~orona, CA 92879-1330
J~._Telephone Number: 909 272-5127
EnvironmentallnfoForm - Route 66 Page I of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
Information indicated by an asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless othen~vise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project s/re, and indicate
the site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of
significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3) Project Location (describe):
North of Foothill Blvd. between Hellman and Archibald
4) Assessods Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary):
See attached
*5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.):
13.02 acres
*6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed
dedications):
12.74 acres
7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site
(attach additional sheet if necessary):
Project contemplates a Development District Amendment
8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other
governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project:
Tentative Tract Map, Final Map, Grading & Improvement Plans, Building Permits
9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Descdbe any
existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of
significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies,
biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies):
Topographically, the property is essentially planar, sloping to the south at approx, two percent grade.
Vegetation consists primarily of a moderate to heavy growth of annual grasses and weeds. A few
eucalyptus trees are present in the eastern and northern portions of the property. Onsite earth materials
and soils are suitable for placement as fill from a geotechnical perspective.
EnvironmentallnfoForm - Route 66 Page 2 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
No state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive species were encountered on the site
and none are expected to occur based upon the degraded condition of the habitat. No unique habitat
were encounted on the site. No jurisdictional Waters or Wetlands of the US or California State
Streambeds were identified on the site. Eight structures were detected. These structures were built
from 1927 - 1954 and consist mainly of Spanish Colonial Revival style single family residences.
There is also a Craftsman style single family residence as well as a venacular painted brick garage
built in 1947. All structures appear to be in fair condition.
1 O) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published
reports and oral history):
The exisiting structures were evaluated for significance and determined non-eligible under CEQA for
inclusion in the National or California Historic Registers, therefore, no mitigation is required or
recommended. The structures have been photo-documented by Brandman Associates.
11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will
affect proposed uses:
The site is impacted by traffic on Foothill Blvd. An accousticel study has been completed which requires
6' high noise barriers to protect certain exterior living areas.
12) Describe'the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate
use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)
if necessary:
The project consists of 18 single family detached bngalows and 138 single family attached motorcourt
condos with common recreation facility, common area landscaping and Foothill Blvd. improvements
consistent with the Visual Improvement Plan. Assuming project approval in January, 2004, we anticipate
the grading phase to be completed by September, 2004 and the infrastructure improvements phase to be
completed by December, 2004. We anticipate 13 building/construction phases with models to be
completed by June, 2005. First move-in's anticipated in May, 2005 (see attached phasing exhibit).
Environmental lnfoForm- Route 66 Page 3 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
13) Desc#be the surrounding properties, including information on p/ants and animals and any cultural, historical, or
scenic aspects. Indicate the type of/and use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of/and use (one-family,
apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard,
etc.):
TO the North - Single family detached residential neighborhood of single story homes meeting standard
setbacks. To the West - mobile home park neighborhood of approximately 90 residential units and
two single family residences. To the South (Foothill Blvd.) is Blockbuster Video and other compatible
uses. To the East - a day care facility, gas station and vacant field.
(See Arborist Report by Jim Borer and Cultural Resources Assessment by Brandman Associates)
14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project?
The proposed project will provide an infill development that is consistent with the scale and character of
the surrounding area and provides a transition between commercial development to the south and single
family residential development to the north. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and
implements the Foothill Corridor vision.
15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these
noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed?
Short-term noise - usual end customary construction activity.
Long-term noise - those associated with residential uses.
(See accoustical report by Mestre-Greve)
'16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees:
There is one tree on site that would merit consideration for boxing or relocation (see tree #55 in Arborist
Report) and miscellaneous palm trees. The oak would require a methodical boxing operating requiring
3-4 months of fop,yard preparation and future viability is not guaranteed. Do not recommend saving.
Palms are relocatable, however, replacing said palms would be more practical and would come with a
contractor's guarantee.
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains:
Project designed to tie into existing municipal infrastructure.
EnvironmentallnfoForm - Route 66 Page 4 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, p/ease
contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) 66,000.00 Peak use (gal/Day) 132,000.00
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/rain/ac)
1 g) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. [] Septic Tank [] Sewer.
If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a santtary sewage system is proposed indicate
expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, p/ease contact
the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number ~)f residential units: '/56
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size:
Approximately 3880 sq. ft. to 4885 sq. ft.
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units):
138 For Sale Units
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Price(s) $250,000.00 to $350,000.00
Rent (permonth) $. to $.
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type:
Single family detached bungalows - 4 & 5 bedrooms
Attached motorcourt townhomes - 2-4 bedrooms
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:
Single family detached = 4.2 persons
Townhomes = 3.5 persons
EnvironmentallnfoForm - Route 66 Page 5 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate
School Districts as shown in A~achment B:
a. Elementary: 9~3
b. Junior High;
c. Senior High 4~6
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses:
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type:
27) Indicatehoursofoperation:
28) Number of employees: Totah
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
29) Provide breakdown of anticipatedjob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the
rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reaide in the
City:
*31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should
be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
Environmental lnfoForm - Route 66 Page 6 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
ALL PROJECTS
32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to
provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response.
Yes. Cucamonga County Water District operates water facilities in both Foothill Blvd. and San Bernardino
Rd. which can provide domestic water and fire supply. In addition, CCWD operates a sewer line within
Foothill Blvd. which can serve this project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates flood control facilities
up to the intersection of Foothill Blvd. and Heliman Ave. which have the capacity to serve this project.
Direct run-off from this project will drain into Foothill Blvd.
33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but ara not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances;
pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage
of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well
as the dates of use, if known.
No recognized environmental conditions observed in relation to the project site.
Various items studied are not considered recognized environmental conditions in accordance with ASTM-
1527-00. These items may possibly include asbestos-containing materials, lead based paints, PCB's,
photo developing materials, automotive repair-related chemicals, anti-freeze "separator", drum storage
container and drums, chemical storage trailers, tires, numerous vehicles, underground heating oil tank,
septic systems, possible buried materials associated with existing soil piles.
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such rnate~als to
be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall
be shown and labeled on the application plans.
N/A (however, common pesticides may be used in normal course of landscaping).
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an
adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
EnvironmentallnfoForm - Route 66 Page 7 of 9 Created on 10/16/2003 11:49 AM
~~~~ . -~ ..-,.. ~ ~.' ,, ..
~1 ~ /'/..~~ ~'~L~~ ~~,~~L ......
*~ ~ · ~ ...... t. n~ ..... '~: -~
-, ~. ~ ~ .$t~ , . . ~ ~ ·
,: , .' ~ ~ IU ' .~ .~m ~ .............
~ ~., _~ r~ = · . , -~1 · · - ' '
I~ e ~ ~'~::~ ~ ~
. ~' , c
JOHN ~/NG HO~ES
255 E RINCON STRE~ SUITE 100 ~osol CHURCH S~ Sg~ 107
CORONA, CA. 92879 ~cHo CU~ON~
PH NO. (909) 272-5115
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
ON
AN APPROXIMATELY 13-ACRE PARCEL
, IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Prepared [hr:
John Laing Homes
255 East Rincon Street, Suite 100
Corona, California 92879
Prepared by:
Tom Dodson & Associates
2150 N. Arrowhead Avenue
San Bemardino, California 92405
March 2003
Certification: I hereby certit~ that thc statements furnished herein and iii the attached exhibits present data
and information required lbr this Biological Survey to the best of my ability, and the facts, statements
and information presented are true and correct to tile best of my knowledge and beliet~
Pamela M. Wright ~'
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................ I
METHODOLOGY 1
RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE 1 CNDDB OVERLAY
FIGURE I REGIONAL MAP .............................................. 4
FIGURE 2 VICINITY MAP
PHOTOS 1-2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................... 6
JL-031 Rancho Cuca redevelopm,nt parcel 2003,wpd -ii- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The purpose of this report is to assess the biological resources and the potential impacts associated with the proposal
to develop a 13-acre parcel in the City of Rancho Cucmnonga, San Bernardino County, California. (Please refer to
Figure 1 .) The site is located generally in the central third of the block west of Hellman Avenue and east of Klusman
Avenue and is directly bounded by San Bernardino Road on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south. (Please refer
to Figure 2.) The site is found i,n an unsectioned portion of Township I South, Range 7 West, SBM as shown on the
USGS - Guasti, 7.5 Minute Series Quadrangle. The site is an infill parcel surrounded by single-family residential
development to the north, a mobile home park tot he ;vest and mixed commercial development to the south and east.
The result of the general biological survey was that no state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive
species were identified on the site and none are expected to occur on the site. The site is not located within designated
critical habitat for any federally listed species.
While no bird nests were encountered during the surveys, the State of California prohibits the take of active bird nests.
Clearing and grubbing of the vegetation on the property should be conducted outside of the State identified breeding
season ofFebrnary 15 through September 1 to prevent the take of an active bird nest. Alternatively, the site would need
to be evaluated by a qualified biologist to determine if birds were nesting on the' site prior to initiation of ground
disturbance.
There are a number of trees on the site. Removing or dmnaging trees may require a pernfit from the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
METHODOLOGY
The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and literature references were examined to obtain information
on species occurrences in the project vicinity. Pamela Wright conducted field surveys on February 26, 2003 by walking
the property. Photos were taken to characterize habitut conditions. Disturbance characteristics and animal species were
recorded.
RESULTS
The project site consists of numerous parcels with diverse current land uses. The majority of the site is characterized
by disturbed, dense, normative grassland interspersed with ornamental landscaping species. Dominant species include
short-podded mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), several species of Bromus, wild radish (Rapbanus sativus), conm~on
mallow (Malva neglecta) and landscape oruamentals including tanmrisk (Tamarix ramosissima), eucalyptus trees
(Eucalyptus sp.), nolmative yucca (Yucca sp.), normative prickly pear (Opuntia sp.) and elderberry (Sambucus
mexicanusj. The normative grassland contains well worn bike paths with jumps and pits in addition to light littering.
The very southern portion of the site are currently mixed uses including vehicles storage and assorted commercial with
lots maintained as compacted dirt, concrete or mowed nonnative grasses. The animal species observed on the site were
Am~a's Hummingbird (Calypte anna), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and northern mockingbird (Mimus
polyglottos).
No state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive species were encountered on the site. No unique or
sensitive habitat was encountered on the site. A list of sensitive species which occur within the USGS Guasti
JL-031 Rancho Cuca rede~lopment parcel 2003.wpd -] - TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
Topographic Quadrangle per the Califomia Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and a discussion of their occurrence
potential is provided in Table l. In summary, the dense, tall growth of the grassland effectively out competes and
precludes native sensitive species from occurring ot~ the project site. The inhospitable habitat of the site, combined with
the biologically isolated nature of the site and the continuing disturbance create cimumstances where it is exceedingly
unlikel3f~that sensitive species documented from the Guasti Quadrangle could occur on the site.
Table 1. CNDDB Occuff'ence Overlav for Guasti USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Scientific COmmOn Status
Name Name Federal/State Typical Habitat Occurrence Potential
Navarretia prostrate none / S2.17 Grows on alkaline soils in The site is heavily disturbed.
prostrata navarretia grassland or vernal pools and no suitable habitat for
between 15 and 700 meters, this species occurs on the
project site. Therefore, it is
very unlikely that this species
could occur on the site.
Perognathus Los Angeles none/species hxhabits open ground with fine Moderately suitable habitat
longimembris pocket mouse of concern sandy soils in low elevation occurs in the portions of the
brevinasus grasslands and coastal sage site vegetated by coastal sage
conmmnities in the Los Angeles scrub and early successional
basin. May not dig extensive chaparral. No suitable
burrows, hiding under weeds habitat occurs on the portion
and dead leaves instead, of the site proposed for
development.
I
Phrynosoma San Diego none / species Inhabits friable, rocky, or The site is heavily disturbed.
coronatum homed lizard of concern shallow sandy soils in coastal and no suitable habitat for
blainvillei sage scrub and chaparral, this species occurs on the
Requires open areas for staining project site. Therefore, it is
and is most frequent in sparsely unlikely that this species
vegetated washes, could occur on the site.
Rhaphiomidas Delhi Sands endm~gered / This species only occurs in According to Figure 6.
terminatus flower-loving none areas of the Delhi Sands Ontario Recovery Unit of the
abdominalis fly formation in southwestern San USFWS Final Recovery Plan
Bernardino & northwestern for the Delhi Sands Flower-
Riverside Counties. It requires loving Fly, no Delhi Sands
fine, sandy soils on wholly or formation occurs on the
partly consolidated dunes and project site or immediate
sparse vegetation, vicinity. No suitable habitat
occurs on the project site, and
therefore this species will not
occur on the site.
JL-031 Rancho Cuca redevelopment parcel 2003.wpd -2- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
Coding and Terms
Federal Species of Concern: "taxa for which the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has information that
indicates proposing to list the taxa as endangered or threatened is possibly appropriate, but for which
substahtial data on the biological v~lnerability and threats are not currently known or on file to support
the i~mnediate preparation of roles." (Arnold). All of these species have a limited range. In hct, some
species are limited to the San B, emardino Mountains area, however, they are locally common.
State Species of Special Concern: An administrative designation given to vertebrate species that appear
to be vulnerable to extinction because of declining populations, limited acreages, and/or continuing
threats.
* Raptor and owls are protected under section 3502.5 of the California Fish and Game code: "It is
unlawful to take, posses or destroy any birds in the orders Falconifonnes or Strigifonnes or to take,
possess or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird."
State Plant Rankings:
SI - less than 6 element occurrences, or less than 1,000 individuals, or less than 2,000 acres
S2 - 6 to 20 element occurrences, or between 1,000 and 3,000 individuals, or between 2,000 and
10,000 acres
S3 - 21 to 100 element occurrences, or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals, or between 10,000
and 50,000 acres
S4 - No Threat Rank
S5 - No Threat Rank
R-E-D Code:
· 1 - very threatened
.2 - threatened
.3 - no current threats knoum
CONCLUSIONS
No state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive species were encountered on the site and none are
expected to occur based upon the degraded condition of the habitat. No unique habitat was encountered on the site.
No jurisdictional Waters or Wetlands of the United States or California State Streambed were identified on the site.
While no bird nests were encountered during the surveys, the State of California Fish and Gan~e Codes 3503 and 3503.5
prohibit the take of active bird nests (please refer to references for a full citation). Clearing and grabbing of the
vegetation on the property should be conducted outside of the State identified breeding season of February 15 through
September I to prevent the take of an active birds nest. Alternatively, the site would need to be evaluated by a qualified
biologist to determine if birds were nesting on the site prior to initiation of ground disturbance.
The project proponent is hereby informed that in the unlikely event that a listed species is observed within the
construction areas prior to or during grading/construction, that the loss of any listed species is considered an illegal take
under both state and federal law.
JL-031 Rancho Cuca redevelopment parcel 2003.wpd -3- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
FIGURE
Regional Map
~7.~ ~ h'":' ~2E~,~ ~E ':~-:' .'- ::"'- . : .' %, ,
E_~,',~ ., , 6:-,... ~ . .
Source: DeLorme TopoQuads
Tom Dodson & Associates
Environmental Consultants
FIGURE 2
Vicinity Map
m, ' (H,stFic~l
Source: DeLorme 'l'opoQuads
Tom Dodson & Associates
Environmental Consultants
IlSiTE TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
PHOTOGRAPHS
FIGURE
3
Environmental Consultants
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
References
Burr, William H. and Richard P. Grossenheider 1980. Peterson Field Guides: A field guide to the Manmqal: North
America north of Mexico, third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.
CalFlor'a: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. [web application]. 2000. Berkeley,
California: The CalFlora Database [a non-profit organization]. Available: http://*vww.calflora.org
California Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB). 2002 A:motated record search for special animals, plants and natural
connnunities. Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento, California.
Enunel, Thomas C. mad John F. Emmel 1973. The Butterflies of Southern California. Science Series 26. Natural
History, Museum of Los Angeles County.
Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
National Geographic Society 1999. Field guide to the birds of North America, third edition. National Geographic
Society, Washington, D.C.
Osborne, Kendall H 2001. Focused survey for the Delhi Sands Giant Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus
abdominalis) on the 32 acre site on the west end office Jnmpa Mountains. Unpublished survey report.
Stebbins, Robert C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles m~d mnphibians. Peterson Field Guides. Houghton
Mifflin Company, Boston.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2000. Final Detemfination of Critical Habitat for the Coastal California
Gnatcatcher; Final Rule. 65 FR 63679'63743.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service 1997. Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis)
Recovery Plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service 1993. Determination of Threatened Status for the Coastal California
Gnatcatcher. 58 FR 16742 16757.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service 1993. Determination of Endangered Status for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving
Fly. 58 FR 49881 49887.
California Fish and Game Code 3503 and 3503.5 read as follows.
3503: It is unlawful to toke, possess or needles'sly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird except aa'
otherwise provided by this code or any regulation made pura'uont thereto.
3503.5: It is unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes'
(birds-of-prey) or to take, possess, or des'troy the nest or eggs of any such bird except aa' otherwise
provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
JL4}31 Rancho Cuca redevelopment parcel 2003.wpd -7- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT16567, and Development Review DRC2003-01036
2. Related Files: Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 and Tree Removal Permit
DRC2003-01035
3. Description of Project:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the zone from Community
Commercial to Mixed Use for a .7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts,
located north of Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-151-
20 thru 23.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 - JOHN LAING
HOMES - A request to subdivide 12.74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots
related to develop 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums with
common recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed Use District
(Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San
Bernardino Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-141-06 thru 18,
29, 31,33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 - JOHN
LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop 18 single-family detached condominiums
fronting San Bernardino Road and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities
and common area landscaping on 12.74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use District
(Subarea 3) of the Foothill Bourevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San
Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN.' 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29,
31,33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
WL Homes, LLC dba John Laing Homes
255 East RJncon Street Suite 100
Corona, California 92879-1330
Attention: Rhonda Neely
6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use/Community Commercial
6. Zoning: Mixed Use/Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 3)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings):
The 12.74-acre site contains eight structures each built between 1927 and 1954. Seven of the
structures are built in the Spanish Colonial Revival styre, and one residence is constructed in the
Craftsman style. A variety of trees exist throughout the property, with remaining vegetation
comprising moderate to heavy growth of grasses and weeds. North of the project site is a single-
family residential neighborhood and south, on Foothill Boulevard, are commercial businesses.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT 16567 Page 2
East of the proposed development are two childcare facilities, gas station, small strip commercial
center, and vacant land. To the west is a 90-unit mobilehome park and two single-family homes.
8, Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9, Contact Person and Phone Number:
Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
(909) 477-2750n, Ext. 4303
10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, o~ participation
agreement):
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
Discharge Permit
· City of Rancho Cucamonga- Grading and Building Permits
GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report:
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
NOx - Nitrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
PMlo - Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board
$CAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
URBEMIS2002 - Urban Emissions Model
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
( ) Aesthetics (¢) Agricultural Resoumes (¢) Air Quality
(¢) Biological Resources (,/) Cultural Resources (¢') Geology/Soils
0 Hazards & Waste Materials (v') Hydrology and Water Quality (,/) Land Use/Planning
( ) Mineral Resources (¢') Noise (v') Population/Housing
(¢') Public Services ( ) Recreation (¢') Transportation/Traffic
( ) Utilities/Service Systems (,,') Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or
agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
() I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that ar.,.e ir~posed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Prepared By: ~~' '~ Date:
Reviewed By: ?~ ~,~ .,/~.~J~ Date:
,2.9?
·
Initial Study for C'~ty of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 4
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentialty SignificantThen
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) ("')
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic Highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
a-c) The project site is located within Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, which
requires specific landscape, architectural, and aesthetic standards to meet the goals and
policies of the City's General Plan and Development Code. The project's design would be
compatible with City standards for the Foothill Boulevard Districts and would incorporate
streetscape, building, and landscape elements to provide an overall positive identity for the
area in conformance with City objectives. No scenic highways exist within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Upon design review approval, visual quality of the area would not
degrade as a result of the project. No impact on aesthetics is expected.
d) All lighting, including security and street lighting, would be installed in accordance with
Development Code standards as specified in the Foothill Boulevard Districts design
standards. All lighting elements of the project would be approved by the City Planner. No
impact is expected from light or glare.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
Wifliamson Act contract?
c) involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a/c) The site is not designated Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide
importance. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland
Initial Study for .v of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 5
or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about
one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table
IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and
eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development.
Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from three acres
to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be
retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The site is within the southern
section of the City and was once used for agricultural purposes. Currently, much of the
land within this area of the City is undergoing residential or commercial development and is
characterized by existing and planned industrial, residential, and commercial land uses.
The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant
unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding considerations was
ultimately adopted by the City Council.
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally,
there are no Williamson Act contracts within the City.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (,") ( ) ( )
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) (¢') ( ) ( )
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable Federal or State
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
number of people?
Comments:
a-c) The proposed residential development would contribute to pollutant levels within the area.
The South Coast Air Basin is currently in non-attainment status for Ozone (03) and
Particulate Matter (PMlo). The addition of pollutants is an unavoidable significant impact for
which the City has adopted a statement of overriding considerations. In addition, the City
implements mitigation measures as standard conditions of approval to control emissions
using the best available control methods to reduce significant impacts from pollutants both
during the construction and post-construction phases of a project.
The residential development includes the construction of 18 detached single-family
condominiums and 138 attached condominiums on 12.74 acres of land. New development
wouJd add to polJutant levels in the area during construction and post-construction phases.
The criteria pollutants screened for using the URBEMIS 2002 model included: reactive
organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates
Initial Study for .v of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 6
(PM~o). Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Air quality impacts caused
during project development are discussed below in the Construction Emissions section,
and long-term impacts are discussed in the Operations Emissions section. The emission
levels listed in Tables 1 and 2 reflect the estimated summer season levels, which are
greater during the summer months than the winter months within the South Coast Air
Basin.
Construction Emissions
Generally, during the grading phase of construction, fugitive dust (PM~o) would be
generated and the site could exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM~0 and NOx. The project
site lies north of a large commercial development containing many different business types,
and south of single-family homes. The eastern portion of the project site borders a pre-
school and the western boundary is next to a mobile home park. The proposed project has
been tentatively phased by the applicant to last an estimated 35 months, starting in July of
2004 and finishing in May of 2007. Infrastructure would be completed in a single phase
(Phase I) and then housing units would be built in thirteen subsequent phases in groupings
of 10 to 18 units per phase. Table 1 depicts the calculated levels of emissions expected
during each year of construction.
Table 1
Estimated Daily Emissions
For Each Construction Year
(2004-2007)
Pollutant Threshold of Construction Construction Construction Construction Significant
Significance Year 2004 Year 2005 Year 2006 Year 2007 (Any Year)
ROG's 75 12.65 12.60 9.68 68.35 No
NOx 100 98.79 94.91 73.71 .21 No
CO 550 90.14 92.54 71.40 4.50 No
PM~0 150 13.81 4.35 3.45 .07 No
As shown, construction emissions remain at, or below, levels established for construction
activities. Settings within the URBEMIS model were modified to reflect actual equipment to
be used on-site and the realistic operational timeframes of the equipment. The emission
estimates listed include mitigation measures used for the control of PM~o, NOx, CO, and
ROG's. Since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone (03) and
suspended particulates (PM~o), and to control fugitive dust during construction activities,
potentially significant impacts would be mitigated by implementation of the following
measures:
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved
by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality
Control Board) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD
Rule 403.
2) Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be swept according to a
schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of
year of construction.
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB']-I'16567 Page 7
3) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) or vegetative
ground covers shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain
inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
4) Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at 15 m.p.h, or below at all
times.
5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition
so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be
available at the construction site for City verification.
6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit
construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow
emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that there use
was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall
also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff.
7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high volume, Iow-pressure spray.
8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD
Rule 1108.
9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over
extended periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil
during and after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances
and use sound engineering practices.
· Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is
carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of
hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds
exceeding 25 m.p.h.) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover
payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
Initial Study for [y of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 8
11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures would decrease, to the extent
feasible, construction emissions associated with grading, equipment exhaust, and exposed
soil surfaces.
Operational Emissions
The majority of the site is a vacant field co~;ered in grasses. Small residences or individual
commercial businesses occupy the frontage portion of the property. The site lies within
Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard District. South of the property is a large commercial
development and north of the proposed site are single-family neighborhoods. Once
completed, the site would contain 18 single-family detached condominiums, and 138
attached condominiums. The primary pollutant sources for the residential development
would be vehicle exhaust and natural gas combustion. Table 2 shows operational
emissions attributable to dwelling units on-site.
Table 2
URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary
(Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOx CO PM~o
Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit.
Area Source 7.84 7.84 1.27 1.27 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.00
Mobile Source 13.42 13.42 12.04 12.04 143.67 143.67 9.53 9.53
Totals 21.26 21.26 13.31 13.31 145.01 145.01 9.53 9.53
SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150
Significance No No No No No No No No
Emission data estimates show that operational pollutant levels would remain below
thresholds established by the SCAQMD and would not violate or contribute substantially to
any air quality violation. As noted in the City's General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued
development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which
already exceed federal and state standards. Mitigation measures included to control
emissions during construction and adherence to City standard conditions of approval for
energy efficiency (listed below) would result in less than significant impacts on air quality
within the project area.
12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water
heaters.
13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of
pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive
receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers,
retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic
·
Initial Study for i~ity of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 9
facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant
impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air
contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site borders a mobile home
park, and single-family residences, and the western edge of Pacific Coast Pre-school. The
above tables show that pollutants would not exceed established thresholds during
construction or post-construction of the proposed project. Mobile emissions of the
proposed residential development would minimally add to existing pollutant levels at
concentrations substantially below currently allowable thresholds. Pollutant concentrations
on sensitive receptors would be less than significant.
e) Typically, residential developments do not create objectionable odors. No impacts are
expected.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Than
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy
or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
Comments:
a) According to Exhibit IV-3, Sensitive Biological Resources, within the City's General Plan,
the project site is not located within or near a biological resource area. In March 2003, Tom
Dodson and Associates performed a biological assessment of the site to determine if
endangered, rare, or threatened species occur on-site.
Initial Study for , of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 10
The majority of the site is characterized by disturbed, dense, non-native grassland interspersed
with ornamental landscaping species. The non-native grassland contains well-worn bike paths
with jumps and pits in addition to light littering. No State or federally listed endangered,
threatened or sensitive species were encountered on-site and no unique or sensitive habitat was
encountered on-site. The existing conditions on-site including dense, tall grassland that
preclude native sensitive species from occurring on the project site. The site is biologically
isolated creating a circumstance where it is exceedingly unlikely that sensitive species would
occur on-site. While no bird nests were encountered during the biologist's site survey, the
following mitigation measure would protect birds potentially nesting on-site:
1) Prior to clearing and grubbing activities, a qualified biologist shall examine
the property to determine if birds are nesting on the site prior to initiation of
ground disturbance.
b-d) The site is characterized by dense, tall growths of grasses, which out compete native
species from occurring on-site. No jurisdictional Waters or Wetlands of the United States
or California State Streambeds were identified on-site. The site is considered biologically
isolated and would not support use as a migration corridor.
e) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has instituted a Tree Ordinance to protect "heritage" trees
such as eucalyptus, palm, oak, sycamore, pine, and others to preserve the scenic beauty,
prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution.
An ArborJst Report prepared in June 2003, by Jim Borer identified a total of 67 heritage
trees with trunk diameters of 15 inches or larger at a point 4.5 feet above the soil level on-
site. The avocado tree #68 does not meet the City's Tree Ordinance criteria of a heritage
tree because all fruit and nut bearing trees are exempt. Furthermore, of the 67 trees only
one heritage tree deserves special attention; a Coast Live Oak.
The Coast Live Oak is in typical condition for its type and maturity and has a good long-
term disposition in its present condition on-site. The Coast Live Oak is the only tree on-site
that would merit consideration for preservation. The arborist concluded that this tree could
be preserved in place by designating a preservation zone of non-disturbance at least as
wide as drip line; however, the proposed development plans would require removal or
relocation of tree due to conflicts with grading and improvements. The arborist indicated
that there is a high level of expectation for long-term survival if the this Coast Live Oak tree
were relocated under the supervision of a qualified and experienced contractor, as well as,
the use of side boxing and tunneling methods. Persistent attention to maintenance during
construction and after re-planting would be critical to ensure long-term survival. The
following mitigation measure shall be implemented:
2) The Coast Live Oak tree shall be moved or replaced in kind with mature
specimen in a location to be determined by City Planner.
Other trees on-site do not represent valuable resources. Eucalyptus trees occurring on-site
were generally declining and already represent a hazard for failure or collapse. Palm trees
could be saved, although, due to their small size, it would be more cost effective to plant
other palms at the time of site landscaping. The various other specimens of tree are no
longer used in ornamental landscaping because of surface rooting, growth forms, and early
maturity decline. The project design includes extensive landscaping, including a minimum
of 45 trees per acre of which at least 10 pement shall be 36-inch box size.
f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan
Exhibit IV-4, Open Space and Conservation Plan, or Exhibit IV-3, Sensitive Biological
Resoumes. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans would occur.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 11
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
of a historical resoume as defined in § 15064.57
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
of an archeological resoume pursuant to § 15064.57
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
resoume or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) (,/') ( ) ( )
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
a-c) In March of 2003, Michael Brandman Associates evaluated the proposed residential
development site for cultural resources in March of 2003. The report involved a cultural
resource record search, transect survey, examination of aerial photographs, evaluation of
the eight on-site structures, and a paleontological resource records review in accordance
with Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A paleontological records search was conducted on March 18, 2003, by the San
Bernardino County Museum. The records search revealed that previous geologic mapping
of the area showed a stratum of well-dissected Pleistocene fan deposits known to have a
high potential for fossil resoumes. The site visit and aerial photograph review showed that
the entirety of the project site has been utilized for agricultural purposes in the past and
currently contains single-family residences. Given the disturbances associated with past
land use it is unlikely that fossil resources would have survived to the present day. The
report concluded that the potential for impacts to any existing fossil resources was minimal.
The archaeological records search was performed by Archaeological Information Center
(AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum on March 4, 2003. The AIC examined current
lists of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historic
Resources (CRHR), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of
Historical Interest (CPHI). The AIC also reviewed the most current California State Historic
Resources Inventory (CHRI) for San Bernardino County to determine local resources
previously evaluated for historic significance, and archival maps. The search indicated that
the project area has never been surveyed, but several historical properties were identified
occurring within a one-half mile radius of the study area. The site survey revealed the
presence of one previously recorded cultural resource, the Santolucito House at 9474
Foothill Boulevard, and seven unrecorded structures more than 45 years old, all of which
are located on-site. Of the eight homes, those located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482,
9494 Foothill Boulevard are potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district
due to the association with a locally important family and the local agricultural industry. The
house at 9494 appears to be the most significant structure from an architectural and
relocation feasibility standpoint and therefore an appropriate mitigation is provided.
However, the eight identified structures within the study area do not qualify for National or
California Registers and are not considered significant under CEQA cultural resource
criteria. The City is considering designation of these eight structures as a Historic Point of
Interest concurrently with this project since the eight structures do not make a strong
enough physical presence to constitute a historic district. However the association to an
Initial Study for ~/of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 12
important family and local agricultural past will be adequately preserved as a Historic Point
of Interest and will include adequate signs and plaques on site to assure the historical
information is not lost. No additional cultural resources are known to occur within the
project area. However, should cultural resources be unearthed during earthmoving
activities the following mitigation measures would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less
than significant level.
1). Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard: The developer shall offer the
structure(s) to the public, for relocation or salvage, for a period of thirty days
prior to demolition.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit plans for
adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to preserve the
historical information relative to the eight identified structures to the City
Planner. Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed
prior to the first occupancy.
3) If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered during earthmoving
activities, earthmoving shall be stopped and uncovered resources shall be
tested for historical significance under the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation Criterion A, B, C, and D prior to continued impact.
4) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during
grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve
them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will:
· Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
· Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of
archaeological sites within new developments, using their special
qualities as a theme or focal point.
· Pursue educating the public about the ama's archaeological heritage.
· Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval
to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
· Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the
inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the
project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original
illustrations~ to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information
Center for permanent archlving.
c) No significant religious or sacred uses occur on-site. According to records used to
identify the potential for cultural resources no burial grounds or cemeteries were located
on the project site. To avoid impacts to potential buried remains the following mitigation
measure would ensure a less than significant impact:
5) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that if any human
remains are unearthed during construction, no further disturbance shall
occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin
Initial Study for Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 13
and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Than
0. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
, substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (-/) ( )
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ). ( ) (v')
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstabJe, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (-,/)
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
Comments:
a) The site is not located within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone for fault-rupture
hazard as defined by the AIquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act or within a City of
Rancho Cucamonga Designated fault hazard zone. The site lies one-mile southeast of an
uncertain segment of the Red Hill Fault. Subsurface investigations have found no evidence
of its existence, nor any evidence of near surface faulting. Surface rupture would not
impact the site.
The site is located in a seismically active area, as is the case throughout Southern
California. The two faults located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which could
directly affect the site, are the Red Hill Fault and the Cucamonga Fault. Other regional
fauits could produce shaking that could be fe~t at the site, but are not located within the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SU BTT16567 Page 14
The Red Hill fault is a thrust fault approximately 15.5 miles in length. Probable magnitudes
on the fault segment range between 6 and 7 moment magnitude (Mw). The eastern end of
the fault is believed to be more active than its western end, and possibly more related to
the Cucamonga Fault rather than a part of the Red Hill Fault. Based on subsurface
explorations of the Red Hill Fault, its existence has not been identified near the site.
The Cucamonga Fault is the most prominent seismic source in the vicinity of the site,
located about four miles north of the site at its nearest point. This thrust fault is the primary
fault along the southern front of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains separating the
crystalline bedrock of the San Gabriel mountains from the valley alluvium. Earthquakes as
large as 7.0 Mw are believed to be possible along segments of the Cucamonga Fault.
Ground rupture during a major event on this fault has been estimated at 6.5 feet.
To avoid significant adverse impacts associated with ground shaking, the applicant would
be roquired to adhere to the California Building Code and the recommendations presented
in the Geotechnical report, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed 200 Unit Townhouses
W/o Klusman RD E/o Hellman Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, prepared for the site by RMA
Group on March 6, 2003.
Groundwater was not encountered during subsurface exploration and was recorded at 550
feet below the surface. The potential for liquefaction is considered Iow due to the depth to
groundwater and compaction of near surface soils. The two percent surface gradient
should preclude the site from the potential for landslides or mudflows. No impact is
expected from liquefaction or landslides.
b) The site is located on a broad, coalescing alluvial fan that emanates from the San Gabriel
Mountains to the north. Subsurface investigation revealed the site is mantled with a thin
layer of loosed to medium dense brown silty sand that grades to yellowish-brown, medium
dense to dense silty sand. At depth, dense sand and gravelly sands with cobbles are
present. These soils lack sufficient amounts of clays to act as a binder and when disturbed
by grading, excavation, or fill activities can become loosened and subject to erosion.
To comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the
contractor must form a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) during
construction activities, and a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-
construction management of storm water run-off, to avoid sedimentation off-site. Storm
water quality management must be considered during a project's planning phase,
implemented during construction, and ultimately maintained for the life of the project.
Improperly managed run-off can be a significant source of water pollution causing impacts
to aquatic habitat, wildlife, and water-dependent beneficial uses. WQMP's are developed
as required under State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) order number R8-
2002-0012 and NPDES number CAS618036. Each storm water quality plan will
incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such
as eroded soils, entering the drainage system. The project proponent would be required to
submit, for agency approval, a proposal identifying the BMP's, or pollution control
measures, that would be incorporated into the project to control discharges into the storm
water system. A WQMP has been formed for the proposed John Laing Homes project,
which identifies BMPs for the post-construction management of storm water run-off. The
following mitigation measures would be required to control storm water effluent:
1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to City
Officials for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)
and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), specifically identifying Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants
entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical.
Initial Study for , of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 15
2) All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept moist or re-planted with
drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion
c) Alluvium at the site has been recorded at approximately 1,000 to 1,100 feet thick and rests
on a basement of granitic bedrock. The density of underlying material and compaction of
near surface soils would protect the site from impacts associated with an unstable geologic
unit.
d) The site is mostly vacant, with tall, dense grasses covering the open areas. Single-family
residences occupy the southern property boundary and a portion of the south-central area
is used for storing and parking of cars. In the past the site was used for citrus production
and as a nursery. According to expansion tests performed on soil samples taken from the
site, the expansion classification is very Iow. No impact is expected from expansive soils.
e) The project would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for
wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident considerations involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located ena site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically intedere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
Initial Study for Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 16
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) J (v')
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
I
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a-b) The proposed project would not be expected to be associated with the release, creation, or
exposure of persons to hazardous substances. A Phase I and limited Phase II site
assessment was performed by Petra Geotechnical Inc. for the site, which concluded that no
recognized environmental conditions were observed, and based on soil analytical data, no
soil removal was warranted. In addition, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was
prepared for the site to ensure typical pollutants associated with the residential
development would not impact adjacent water ways, or release pollutants beyond project
boundaries. Implementation of drain inserts, resident education programs, and efficient
irrigation would be used to control miscellaneous release of oil and grease, organic
compounds, and pesticides. No impact is expected due to the release or creation of health
hazards related to the residential development.
c) The project site is located next to and west of the Pacific Coast Pre-school. An elementary
school is located .25 miles east of the project site. A junior high school is located .52 miles
north of the project site. The project would not handle, or emit hazardous materials,
substances or wastes. No impact from hazardous wastes is expected on local schools.
d) The project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. The
database search of pertinent federal, state, and local regulatory agency data did not reveal
the presence of an unmitigated hazardous waste site. During the Phase I site assessment,
a gasoline spill was recorded, and remediation was performed to effectively remove the
identified contamination. The site would not pose a significant hazard to the public.
e-f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan, is not within two miles of a public
airport, and is not in the vicinity of a public airstrip. No impact is anticipated.
g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies
and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of
a disaster. City Staff would review site plans to ensure the proposed project does not
interfere with evacuation or emergency response. Approval by the City's engineering and
planning departments would ensure no impact from the project.
h) According to General Plan Exhibit V-7, the proposed project site is not located within a high
fire hazard area. According to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, Rancho
Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland
Interface area found in the northern part of the City. The project site currently contains tall,
dense grasses on-site. The initiation of construction would result in substantial grading
activities, leaving the site devoid of flammable vegetation. Upon construction completion,
the site would contain landscape elements consisting of natural vegetation and a program
for maintenance of the site instituted through a Home Owners Association. No impact is
expected due to flammable vegetation.
Initial Study for Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB']-r16567 Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poter~tialJy S~gnificant T~an
8, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intedere ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production
rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (-/) ( )
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) (¢') ( )
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) (-/) ( )
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, ( ) ( ) ( )
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a/f) A Phase I Site Assessment was conducted for the site. The report concluded that no
recognized environmental conditions as defined by the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) were identified. Although no existing conditions were found, the site
would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to protect off-
site water quality by contrelling storm water discharges from the proposed residential site.
Pollutants associated with activities of tenants may include trash and debris, oil and grease,
pesticides, or nutrients and sediments from landscaped areas. Source control Best
Management Practices (BMPs) chosen for the John Laing Homes development include site
design to allow storm water percolation through pervious surfaces before water can migrate
off-site, efficient irrigation to avoid over-watering, and stenciling of storm drains to inform
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB'i-r16567 Page 18
residents that run-off drains into a watemhed. Additional BMPs to be implemented at the
site would be media filters and drain inserts to remove gross pollutants such as trash,
debris, sediments, particulates and hydrocarbons. Implementation of suggested BMPs
would minimize impacts on water quality to less than significant.
b) According to Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), 43 percent of the City's water is
currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has
adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. According to
General Plan Exhibit IV-2, the proposed project would not deplete groundwater supplies,
nor would it intedere with recharge because it would not be within an area designated as a
recharge basin or spreading ground. CCWD has plans to meet the increased need through
the construction of future water facilities. The project site does not lie within an area used
for groundwater recharge. Groundwater basins within Rancho Cucamonga are replenished
by natural precipitation, and through a number of spreading grounds and percolation sites.
Groundwater pumping is also limited by a 1958 Superior Court judgment, which limited the
extractable amount to less than the sustainable yield. No impact on groundwater supplies
is expected.
c-d) All runoff would be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
handle the flows. The proposed project would not alter the course of a river or stream, but
would impact the current drainage pattern by use of pervious surfaces for parking,
sidewalks, and common use areas such as pool grounds or play grounds. To avoid
siltation or flooding off-site the project proponent has prepared a Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP), which would incorporate efficient design into the project to
retain sizable amounts of pervious areas such as recreation areas and vegetated slopes to
allow infiltration during storm events. The City Engineer must approve a grading and
drainage plan prior to issuance of grading permits. Adherence to the WQMP would ensure
that impacts from siltation and flooding are less than significant.
e) The site would drain into the Cucamonga Creek channel. The Cucamonga Creek channel
has undergone significant flood control improvements such as concrete lining in order to
handle significant storm water flows. Run-off from the proposed development would be
conveyed within private streets, catch .basins, and parkway culverts, which would then be
directed into public storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue to a
final destination of the Cucamonga Creek channel. A WQMP was formulated for the site to
control the addition of potential pollutants into the storm drain system. Measures such as
media filters and drain inserts would be used to remove trash, debris, sediments, and
particulates from site run-off, combined with storm drain signage and site design.
Implementation of WQMP measures would ensure impacts to water quality are less than
significant.
g-j) According te the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the site does not lie
within a 100-year flood zone. The site does not lie near any dams or levees. No standing
bodies of water exist near the site eliminating the risk of tsunami or seiche.
Initial Study for Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 19
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potemially SignificantThan
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) (-,,') ()
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habita! conservation plan or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) Eight single-family residences currently occupy the land proposed for the condominium
complex. These homes would be demolished or removed in order to establish a new 156-
unit condominium complex. The project site is located in a neighborhood characterized by
older single-family homes interspersed with a variety of commercial and office uses along
Foothill Boulevard. The loose and scattered arrangement of the residences occupying the
site are not bound by a common link and would not fall into the formal definition of a
community. A less than significant impact is expected on the established residences on-
site.
b) Land use in the vicinity of the project is a combination of single-family residential, multi-
family residential, and community commercial uses. Residential uses in conjunction with
retail establishments are the designed land uses for the Mixed Use designation with in
Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. Development of the proposed 156-unit
condominium complex would be in conformance with permitted uses, and would be
required to conform to architectural and landscape designs contained in the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code. Approval of the Development District Amendment, which
would include the conversion of 0.7 acre of land from Community Commercial to Mixed
Use, would reduce impacts associated with incompatible land use to a less than significant
level.
c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan
area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the project site is not within an area
known to contain sensitive biological resources; therefore, development would not
adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals or any conservation plans.
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 20
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significan: Tha~
Significant With Mifigafion Significant No
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the less of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a) According to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-l, the site is not designated
as a State Aggregate Resources Area; therefore, there is no impact.
b) According to the City's General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-l, the site is not designated
as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiafi SignificantThen
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (-,/)
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ( ) (-/) ( ) ( )
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( )
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) In October 2003, Mestre Greve Associates and Wieland Associates separately prepared a
Noise Analysis to identify noise impacts associated with the development of 18 single-
family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums. The report utilized the
City's noise standards, which are based upon the Community Noise Equivalent Level
initial Study for '"~ty of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 21
(CNEL) index. Standards adopted for the City of Rancho Cucamonga included a 65 CNEL
for exterior noise, and a 45 CNEL for interior noise.
The primary noise source in the project area is traffic noise from San Bernardino Road and
Foothill Boulevard. For the analysis, noise measurements were obtained along Foothill
Boulevard at throe representative cross section locations on the project site. In addition,
future traffic information was received from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
Federal Highway Administration's Highway Noise Model was used to compute equivalent
noise levels based on input information including, traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed,
and roadway geometry.
Results of the study concluded that units with first and second floor exterior living areas
along Foothill Boulevard would be exposed to maximum traffic noise levels of 68.7 CNEL.
Maximum noise levels for dwelling units along San Bernardino Road would be 61.5 CNEL.
Noise attenuation measures would be roquirod for units with first and second floor patio
exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard. Second floor condominiums along Foothill
Boulevard would also require a 23.7-decibel exterior to interior noise reduction to be
achieved through implementation of building upgrades during construction.
The following measures would be required to mitigate impacts to noise standards
established by the City of Rancho Cucamonga:
1) Noise barriers shall be required for units with first floor patio exterior living
areas along Foothill Boulevard. Buildings 3, 9, 10, and 11, will require 6-foot
high barriers and building 12 will require a 5-foot barrier. All barriers shall be
constructed with a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and
shall have no openings or gaps.
2) Noise barriers shall be required for units with second floor balcony exterior
living areas along Foothill Boulevard. Buildings 3, 9, and 11, shall require a
6-foot high barrier and building 12 shall require a 5.5-foot high barrier. All
noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square
foot and shall have no openings or gaps.
3) Plan 4 master bedrooms shall require a building upgrade of dual glazed
windows meeting a Sound Transmission Class 30 rating.
4) Mitigation measures recommended within the Noise Analysis shall be strictly
adhered to, and stipulated as a condition of approval by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
b) The rosidential development would not generate excessive groundborne vibrations or noise
levels. Groundborne vibrations could be generated during on-site grading or construction
activities but would only be short-term. No impact is expected due to excessive
groundborne vibration or noise.
c-d) During post-construction, the residential development would not exceed noise standards
established by the City of Rancho Cucamonga nor would noise levels exceed current
ambient noise levels. According to the noise analysis performed for the project site, the
primary noise source within the area is traffic noise associated with Foothill Boulevard and
San Bernardino Road. Implementation of mitigation measures within this section would
reduce elevated noise levels to a less than significant level.
During construction short-term ambient noise levels may rise due to construction-related
activities such as grading, hammering, or pneumatic tool operation. The following
Initial Study for "~'ty of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 22
mitigation measures would be enfomed to control short-term noise levels within the project
vicinity:
5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p,m.
and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or
a national holiday.
6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified
in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line.
Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. The Planning Division
may require monitoring at other times. Said consultant shall report their
findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels
exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the
Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then
construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance
with above noise standards or halted.
7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed
100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the
developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction
traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes
that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
e-f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and there are no public or private
airports within two miles of the site. The site is located approximately three miles northerly
of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signiiicant 31~an
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) (,,') ( )
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
the construct on of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a) The City of Rancho Cucamonga estimates the build-out population of the City to be
approximately 160,000 individuals according to the General Plan. The project applicant
has submitted a maximum occupancy of the 156-unit condominium complex to be 559
people. The additional individuals represent less than one percent growth within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga compared to population estimates obtained in January of 2003
(population of 137,119, January 2003, Planning Department). The project site is
surrounded by different types of residential and commercial development and would not
Initial Study for ! of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 23
require extension of infrastructure that might induce additional growth. Population growth is
considered a less than significant impact.
b-c) The eight houses currently occupying the site would have to be demolished or removed for
development of a 156-unit condominium complex. Although these houses would be
destroyed or displaced, and may be affordable, they are not substantial in number and
would be replaced with a larger amount of available housing. The displacement of
individuals from the eight housing units is considered I~ nificant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Than
13, PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for any of the
public services: ( ) ( ) (,,,) ( )
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) (,,') ( )
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) (~') ( )
Comments:
a) Fire Protection - The proposed project site is located north of Foothill Boulevard between
Hellman Avenue on the west and Malachite Avenue on the east. Fire station 172 is
situated on San Bernardino Avenue, approximately 500 feet east of the project site,
adjacent to Malachite Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval from the California
Building and Fire Codes would be enforced upon project approval. A less than significant
impact is expected on fire services.
b) Police Protection - Development of the site would incrementally increase the need for
routine police protection services. In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by
the City Council. This is a less than significant impact.
c) Schools - The proposed development would generate additional students. Based on a
156-unit condominium complex, a total of 72 students would be generated within the
Central School District (0.46 students per dwelling unit), and 32 high school aged students
would be generated within the Charley Joint Unified High School District (0.20 students per
dwelling unit). Total elementary/middle and high school aged children generated by the
project would be an additional 104 students. The applicant would be required to pay
appropriate school impact fees. The impact is considered less than significant.
d) Parks - The City standard for parkland is five acres for every 1,000 residents. The Quimby
Act allows for the collection of 3 acres of parkland, or in-lieu fees, for new residential
subdivisions. The City also supplements the park system by encouraging development of
private open space within large residential projects. The 156~unit condominium complex
includes recreational amenities such as barbeque/picnic areas, and tot lots, and would pay
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB'Fi'16567 Page 24
the appropriate developer impact fees as directed by City Planning Staff. No impact on
parks is expected.
e) Public Facilities/Services - Development of the site would incrementally increase traffic on
adjacent streets. In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the
applicant would pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council.
Impacts on Public Services are considered to be less than significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Comments:
a-b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan contains a park standard of five acres of
parkland per 1000 residents. The proposed development would add 559 additional
residents to the area, and would provide 6.7 acres of private usable open space to
include BBQ/picnic areas and tot lots. In addition, the City implements developer impact
fees as an alternative funding source to reach the objective for park acreage per resident.
The applicant would be required to pay any assessed impact fees and construction of on-
site recreational facilities would not create an adverse physical effect on the environment;
therefore no impact is expected.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SlgnJfican!Than
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( ) (/) ( )
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucarnonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB'~r16567 Page 25
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiaJly SignificantThan
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) (,") ( )
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) (,,') ( )
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Comments:
a-b) The project proposes the construction of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138
attached condominiums, which would generate an additional 1,070 vehicle trips per day.
Access is provided to the site via two gated driveways, one on Foothill Boulevard and one
on San Bernardino Road. Foothill Boulevard is a major east/west divided arterial street,
estimated to service 23,800 vehicle trips per day. Vehicle trips would increase by 4.5
percent due to the project. The Project is in conformance with County CMP and Rancho
Cucamonga Traffic Model which, calculates 77 two-way vehicle trips during peak hour.
The project will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land use;
therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan
(CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. Conformance to Foothill Boulevard
District design standards and implementation of street improvements associated with City
established standards would be required to maintain a Level of Sbrvice E or better at
intersections. As part of City designated standards, street improvements such as curb and
gutter, street lighting, and additional turning lanes would be installed along Foothill
Boulevard to relieve impacts associated with the increased traffic generated along this
major arterial. Installation of directed improvements and the payment of any fees
associated with the development would reduce the impacts from project-generated traffic to
less than significant.
c) The site is offset north of Ontario Airport by 3.1 miles and is approximately 1 mile north of
the Metrolink rail lines. The project would not interfere with air or rail traffic.
d-e) The project proposes the construction of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138
attached condominiums, which would generate an additional 1,070 vehicle trips per day.
The project would be required to conform to Foothill Boulevard District design standards
and implement street improvements associated with City standards of approval. As part of
City designated standards, street improvements such as curb and gutter, street lighting,
and additional turning lanes would be required along Foothill Boulevard. Street
improvements would ensure smooth traffic flow and increase access for emergency
vehicles. The project design includes two access points for emergency vehicles.
Installation of directed improvements and the payment of any fees associated with the
development would reduce the impacts from traffic hazards to less than significant.
f) According to the City's Development Code, a total of 354 parking spaces must be provided.
Of the total 156 dwelling units, 104 units require two spaces each, 26 of the units require
1.8 spaces each, and another 26 units require 2.3 spaces per unit. Additionally, for every
four units, one off-street parking stall is required. The proposed site plan includes a total of
376 spaces, which exceeds the City standard by 22 spaces; therefore, no impact is
expected.
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 26
g) Foothill Boulevard is an existing fixed route transit service corridor with the potential for
transfer points and park and ride facilities. Included in the Foothill Boulevard Districts are
requirements for sidewalks and pedestrian friendly areas. Also along Foothill Boulevard
are scheduled Class II bike lanes, which are located next to the curb or edge of paved
roadways and are a minimum of five feet in width. The proposed project would be required
to comply with adopted policies; therefore, no conflicts with alternative transportation
policies are expected.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantThan
16, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS, Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (-,/)
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
a-b/e) Existing housing on-site is served by underground septic systems. The septic tanks
would be removed in accordance with Environmental Health Department protocols, and
disposed of properly. The proposed project would tie into existing wastewater
infrastructure located within adjacent streets. The developer would make all needed and
necessary improvements. The project is estimated to create 32,500 gallons per day of
sewer flows. The Cucamonga County Water District operates the sewer line within
Foothill Boulevard south of the project and has indicated the ability to serve the project's
wastewater needs. No impact is expected on wastewater facilities.
c) Development of the project site would require the installation of storm water conveyance
structures such as curb and gutter systems, catch basins, and culverts. In addition, the
applicant has formulated a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes
·
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 27
signage on outlets to the storm water system, and the use of drain inserts to effectively
remove debris including trash, grease and oil, sediments, and particulates. The
Cucamonga Creek Channel would be the final receptor for storm waters, and any
additional improvements would be made to safely accept the additional flows. No impact
is expected on storm water drainage.
d} The Cucamonga County Water District has indicated the ability to serve the proposed
development. Existing water lines have been installed in both San Bernardino Road and
Foothill Boulevard and serve other residential and commercial developments located
north and south of the proposed project. New or altered water delivery systems are not
anticipated.
f) The current City approved solid waste provider would serve the proposed development.
No alterations in the type or scope of services would be required. No impact on solid
waste disposal is expected.
g) The project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding
solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction
procedures consistent with AB 939. No impact to Federal, State, or local regulations is
expected.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 3otentlally Signil~cantThan
17, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) No State or federally listed endangered, threatened, or sensitive species were encountered
on the site. Based upon the degraded condition of the habitat, none are expected to occur.
No unique habitat was encountered on-site. Mitigation has been proposed to protect
possible nesting birds according to State Fish and Game Codes 3503 and 3503.5. Eight
structures currently stand on-site, of which, none qualify for National or California Registers
and therefore are not considered significant under CEQA. No additional cultural resources
Initial Study for Rancho Cucarnonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 28
are known for the project area. The cultural assessment determined that no impact to any
existing or future fossil resoumes that may be located within the study area exists. A less
than significant impact is expected on cultural and biological resoumes.
b) Project related impacts associated with increased air emission and elevated noise levels
would be mitigated to less than significant. The project location has been disturbed for
many years dating back to the 1880s when the land was used for ranching and agricultural
activities. In 1928 residential structures were beginning to be established, followed by the
establishment of several surrounding commercial businesses. The residences currently
occupying the site are served by septic waste disposal systems. The new development
would utilize the City's sewer system and implement a Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) to control pollutants within storm, or site run-off. The residential development
would not be associated with significant emission of pollutants. Development of other
housing projects and some neighborhood commercial projects is occurring within the area.
These types of projects are encouraged by the City to meet both the housing and
consumptive needs of current and new residents. The new residential development would
contribute to cumulative impacts.
c) The project would not create substantially adverse impacts on humans either directly or
indirectly. Adding pollutants to an area where air quality is a problem would have an affect
on immediate achievement of clean air goals but ail operational pollutant levels are below
thresholds set to avoid adverse health effects. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial
Study will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamenga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(,/) General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001 )
(,/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, Certified January 4, 1989)
(,/) Tom Dodson and Associates, Biological Survey on an Approximately 13-Acre Parcel in
Rancho Cucamonga, Mamh 2003.
(v') Borer, Jim. Certified Arborist #496. Arborist Report, Project Location: Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 2008-141-06 Through 17, 33 Through 35, 37, and 38, 208-151-20 Through 23,
San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard Between Layton and Malachite
(Approximately) Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, June 12, 2003.
(v') Michael Brandman Associates. A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment,
Paleontological Records Seamh, and Architectural History Evaluation: Laing Homes' Due
Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
May 16, 2003.
(¢') RMA Group, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed 200 Unit Town Houses W/o
Klusman Road E/o Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, March 6, 2003.
Initial Study for of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 29
(v') Petra Geotechnical Inc., Environmental Division. Final Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment and Limited Phase II Investigation; 13 Parcels Located on Foothill Boulevard,
Bounded by San Bernardino Road to the North, Between Hellman Avenue and Klusman
Road, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, California, March 28, 2003.
(v') Mestre Greve Associates, Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 16567, City of Rancho
Cucamonga, October 10, 2003.
(,,') Wieland Associates, Acoustical Evaluation for Tentative Tract 16567, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA, October 9, 2003.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUB'I-I'16567 Page 30
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I ceriify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project pla~s or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.
Applicant's Signat~~"~ Date:
' Print Name and Title: ,~rto'n.(~,. ~X,~,..~\~.~ I ,~,~Oq.'~'C~.~'~"-
i:~olanning\final~plngcomm~envdoc\drc2003-01036i.s..doc
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037
Public Review Period Closes: May 19, 2004
Project Name: Project Applicant: John Laing Homes
Project Location (also see attached map): Located north of Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and
Malachite Avenues -APN: 0208-151-20 thru 23.
Project Description: A request to change the zone from Community Commercial to Mixed Use for a .7 acre
portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Deolaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
May 19, 2004
Date of Determination Adopted By
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Apd114, 2004
Chairman Macias called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart
ABSENT: Cdstine McPhail
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Larry Henderson,
Principal Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney; Douglas Fenn,
Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Assistant Planner; Betty Miller,
Associate Engineer; Lois Schrader Planning Secretary;
ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made at this time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stewart, carded 3-0-1-1 (McPhail absent, Macias abstain),
to approve the minutes of March 24, 2004.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-
A.
01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the zone from Community Commercial to
Mixed Use for a .7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located north of
Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN: 0208-151-20 thru 23.
Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-1'16567, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree
Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Histodc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105. Staff has
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 - JOHN
IAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12.74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered
lots for the development of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached
condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed
Use Distdct (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard
and San Bemardino Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-141-06
thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23. Related Files:
Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Development Review DRC2003-01036,
Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00105, and Histodc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105. Staff
has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 - JOHN
LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop 18 single-family detached
condominiums fronting San Bemardino Road and 138 attached condominiums with common
recreation facilities and common area landscaping on 12.74 net acres of land within the Mixed
Use Distdct (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard
and San Bemardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN: 0208-141-06
thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23. Related Files:
Development Distdct Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Tree
Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105. Staff has
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that the public headng was still open for the Historic
Preservation item, Histodc Point of Interest Designation DRC2004-00105, and that it would be heard
concurrently with the related Planning Commission Items A, B, and C as noted above.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report noting that a few minor corrections
were being made to the resolutions. He commented that the resolutions delineate the 18 single-
family structures as condominiums and that since each property owner will own the individual lots,
the resolutions should indicate that they are single-family detached homes. In addition, he noted that
on page 142, A-C of the agenda packet, that condition #3 would be revised to read, 'q'he buildings
along the west boundary shall be adjusted to provide a minimum 20-foot setback and a continuous
buffer of the Podocarpus evergreen trees shall be provided along the project boundary." He added
that on page 160, A-C of the agenda packet, condition #15 would be changed to read, "Six foot
decorative block walls shall be constructed along the east and west project perimeter. For perimeter
walls, if a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with
the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous
property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project
perimeter."
Chairman Macias asked the Commissioners if there were any questions.
Commissioner Stewart asked why the other homes were not being relocated like the one at 9494
Foothill Boulevard. She asked why we did not require the developer to pay to have all of the homes
moved for preservation. She commented that from a histodc preservation perspective, she
wondered if offedng the homes for purchase or salvage is enough. She was concerned that perhaps
we have not done enough to save these structures and that from the larger perspective of the
Etiwanda Historic Study Task Force; she knows Etiwanda is looking for historical structures.
Mr. Henderson responded that the Craftsman house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard is an example of
classic Craftsman architecture and that it has been well cared for. He commented that it is the only
home of the group that has architectural significance and is unique. He remarked that the other
homes are very simple and have been structurally altered and are not in very good shape. He added
that they did not consider the homes as a group in the sense of being a historical distdct either
because they are not really linked by design or arrangement and the area has been split apart with
various commercial businesses. He noted that the other homes ara also quite small (800-900
square feet) and it would be difficult to find someone that would be willing to invest in and rehabilitate
such small homes.
Commissioner Stewart said she had overlooked the size of the homes. She commented that the
City now has the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force that is trying to get more significant
histodc homes moved into the historic area, She noted that she wants to be cautious about
destroying homes that may have merit and at the same time post a plaque giving Klusman
recognition and then not do the appropriate thing by destroying homes. She remarked that she
believes the Task Force will want the relocation of the Craftsman house.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- Apdl 14, 2004
Mr. Buller responded and noted that we (the City) do not want to see a loss of our histodc resources
because of relocation or rehabilitation costs. He remarked that the other homes moved to the
Northtown area are larger and that this particular group of homes not being considered to be
relocated or restored tonight are not recommended for preservation because of their small size and
because their architecture is not representative of the histodc element found in Etiwanda and even
the one on 9494 may not be the appropriate age or size for the Etiwanda area.
Rhonda Kneeley, John Laing Homes, 255 East Rincon Street, Corona, stated that they had
contacted the Northtown Housing Development representatives to discuss their possible interest in
the old homes. She remarked that their only interest was in the Craftsman home at 9494. She
added that they would continue to work with staff on Commissioner Stewart's suggestion. She
added that there are other conditions that they are requesting to be revised including the conditions
found on pages 113, 128, and 130, A-C of the agenda packet, which, with the revisions, will
specifically allow the building permits for the model homes to be issued pdor to; 1) the processing of
the Vacation of 2nd Avenue; 2) the recording of the final Tract Map; 3) the recording of the CC&Rs
and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association, and 4) the submission of the Street
Improvement Plans.
Chairman Macias opened the public hearing.
Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton Street, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he is excited and happy
with the new proposed project over the project proposed a year ago. He remarked that he likes the
design and believes the project will enhance the property values adjacent to the project. He
commented that the developer was responsive to their concerns regarding public safety and he is
pleased they are putting in a traffic signal at the intersection of San Bemardino Road and Archibald
Avenue. He pointed out that a number of people were in attendance at the meeting with him and he
asked them to stand showing their support of the project (5 people stood). He reported that this is a
democratic process and that it works well. He noted for the benefit of the high school students in
attendance that when the previous project was proposed for this site, 400 people came out in
opposition. He remarked that if you are going to come out and complain about a project that you also
have the responsibility to come out in support (of a good project).
Gilbert McCoy, 9340 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he and his wife own Foothill
Mobile Manor trailer park. He reported that he is supportive and excited about the new project. He
said the project will make a wonderful neighbor and should help with the difficulties they now
experience with drug activity on the property and people jumping the fence who cause damage to the
trailer park. He added that many of the residents were in attendance in support of the project and
that he said of the 90 units in the park, there is almost 100 percent support of approval for the
project.
Jayme Walinga, 11357 Mountain View Drive, #132, Rancho Cucamonga, asked fora definition of the
term "seller/salvage" and if the home became a Histodc landmark, would the designation keep that
from happening.
Commissioner Stewart explained that it is her understanding that if the home is not sold then the
home could be dismantled and sold off in pieces. She noted an example would be that someone
could come and buy the bathroom fixtures and someone else might buy the doors or hardware from
the house. She said specifically that they are considering relocating the home at 9494 at the least
and to consider the feasibility of relocating all of them. She added that the Point of Interest requires
the developer to place a commemorative plaque but does not require the preservation or habilitation
of the structures.
Kuystal Hereford, 10730 Church Street, #88, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the home at 9494 Foothill
Boulevard is the largest of the homes in question. She asked what would be accomplished if the six
Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 14, 2004
residences are relocated or demolished and if that would that bdng in moro executives or businesses
to the area.
Chairman Macias closed the public headng.
Mr. Buller responded and explained why would we remove or demolish several homes. He explained
that because these homes front the Old Route 66, it is no longer an appropriate place for single-
family detached homes. He added that our goal is to build projects that are good neighbors to the
existing residences and businesses and that as old homes are romoved, they are replaced with new
stock that are designed to be better neighbors. He commented that along Foothill Boulevard, we
give a little to get better development for the community. He noted that this project will provide more
homes for families and they are designed to be moro compatible with the businesses that are now
located along Foothill Boulevard and they will benefit the businesses as well.
Commissioner Stewart commented that she believes it is a good project although she never really
was a proponent of the "motor court" concept, but she is in favor of this one because it is mixed use
and Foothill Boulevard needs some attention in that area and the design thematically reflects Route
66 with the motor court concept. She added that a condition of the project requires the developer to
place commemorative plaques along Foothill Boulevard that point out the significance of Route 66.
She added that she appreciated the neighbors' participation and their support.
Commissioner McNiel said he felt is it a good project. Mr. McNiel asked if there is a perimeter block
wall between the single-family home section and the condominium section. He also asked the
developer to be conscientious about keeping the construction dust down and being mindful of the
allowable hours for construction.
Mr. Bullet reported that the project has been designed to actually integrate the two sections of the
project and therofore there is no block wail separating them.
Commissioner Fletcher stated that he is in agreement with the other Commissioners and that he is
thrilled and glad about the support of the neighbors and it shows the applicant worked well with them
and addrossed their concerns. He added that the new project ties in with the Route 66 motor courts
and the 18 single-family homes provide an excellent transition to the condo project and is excellent
for the homeowners along San Bemardino Road. He added that the visual enhancement weuld help
revitalize Foothill Boulevard and the west end part of the City.
Commissioner McNiel added that he agrees with Commissioner Stewart in rogard to the rosidence at
9494 Foothill Boulevard and that we should do whatever we can to preserve it. He commented that
we had several homes in the City we attempted to preserve that were never relocated; one was up
on blocks and eventually it fell apart. He commented that he only has a real interest in the
Craftsman home. He noted that he understands why we do not have interest in the other homes.
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, asked if there is any direction or clarification from Engineering
and if the changes to the engineering conditions mentioned would meet with their approval.
Betty Miller, Associate Engineer, stated that allowing Building Permits to be issued for the model
homes prior to the other conditions being met is not an uncommon request and that it would be
acceptable.
Mr. Buller commented that it has been a "good marriage" with John Laing Homes and commended
them for working with the neighborhood and for the neighborhood working with John Laing Homes.
He thanked them and Mrs. Kneeley for their hard work.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stewart, to recommend approval of Historic Point of
Interest DRC2004-00105 and Development Distdct Amendment DRC2003-01037 to be fowvarded to
Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 14, 2004
the City Council for final action and to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, and Development
Review DRC2003-01036 and to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
and to accept the various revisions to the Conditions of Approval and the Resolutions of Approval as
noted dudng the presentation and public hearing.. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: McPHAIL - carded
The Planning Commission then returned to the remaining business of the Historic Preservation
agenda to its completion. At the close of the Historic Preservation Commission meeting at
7:42 p.m., the Commissioners returned to the business of the regular Planning Commission agenda
as follows.
D. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SU
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision ndustrial
condominium purposes on 1.2 acre of land, in the industrial Park District ~ located at
the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN: Related files:
Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map and
Development Review DRC2003-00988. Staff has prepared a Miti
environmental impacts for consideration.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOI ' - OASIS
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 16 foot office building on
1.2 acre of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), Io it the northeast comer of Red
Oak Avenue and Laurel Street -APN: 0208-352-11. files: Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM16487, Tentative Parcel Map SU Development Review DRC2003-
00988. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative lration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
Brad Buller, City Planner, noted that Item D would in conjunction with item I.
Donald Granger, Assistant Planner, I report.
Chairman Macias opened the public headl
Manny Badiola, 10431 AImol , Cucarnonga stated he represents Oasis Commercial
~d understand and concur with all the conditions of approval.
Development and that they
all of Mr. Granger's and Ms. Fong's assistance and that they
He noted
were wonder[ul to work with. that they are working on an adjacent site that will
mirror the image o enhance the development of the area. He added his thanks
to Mr. Bullet for his help as
Chairman M~' )preciation of Mr. Badiola's compliments and remarked that they are
good people to work
Seeing and further comment, Chairman Macias closed the public hearing.
:ommented that the proposed project is a fine development and that he is
work done by the Design Review Committee. He said the people on Design
Review a great job.
PI Commission Minutes -5- April 14, 2004
Nell G. Surati (Gen. Manager)
Knights Inn
1225 W. Beale Street
February 9, 2004 ~]' FEB 1 1 2004
J0,,mNc 0m
INLArtD DIVISION
To:The Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive G~'~
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Sub.: Proposed Tentative Tract 16567
Main Street at Route 66 ~r-
Honorable Commissioner(s):
I am the US Citizen and the resident of State of Arizona. I own a Mixed used rental property in the city of
Rancho Cucamonga at 9575 San Bemardino Road (parcel number: 02 08 151050000). My property is a
preschool and day care facility run by a private California citizen family members on a lease contract
basis. My property is in the neighborhood of the above-mentioned Tract No. 16567. A private
development company, John Laing Homes, is planning to build and develop 156 single family homes on
this tract which is about 13.02 acres of mixed-use land.
This developer has noticed property owner's'within the vicinity of their project regarding their proposal.
I received a letter and knew about this very nice proposal and also, I personally visited the developer's
office to see the whole project. I was really impressed to see this project. There will be a very good
outcome from this project and I believe it will be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community. I
strongly express my support as one of the neighborhood {cai estate property owners.
Thank you very much for considering my opinion as one of the property owners in making your decision.
I wish good luck to every individual party and department for the success of this beautiful project.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 928 - 753 - 3881.
Neil G. Surati
tt
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003~01037, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE ZONE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO
MIXED-USE FOR A .7 ACRE PORTION OF SUBAREA 3 OF THE
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETVVEEN HELLMAN AND
MALACHITE AVENUES - APN: 0208-151-20 THRU 23; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development
District Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 04-34,
recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development
District Amendment DRC2003-01037.
2. On May 19, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on May 19, 2004, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment; and
c. The application is in conjunction with a several applications on April 14, 2004 to
establish a requested Master Plan, Tract Map, and Architectural Plans for the development of
18 single-family, detached condominiums fronting San Bernardino Road, and 138 attached
condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping on the balance
of the property; and
d. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration was been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA
guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 04-**
DRC2003-01037 - JOHN LAING HOMES
May 19, 2004
Page 2
City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information
contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
SECTION 3: Section 17.32 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, is hereby
amended to change Subarea 3 Land Use Plan, in words and figures, as shown in the attached
Exhibit "A."
SECTION 4: The Rancho Cucamonga Development Districts Map is hereby amended to
read, in words and figures, to be consistent with Exhibit "A."
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC
LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MU MIXED USE U UTILITY
SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC
CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL CO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE ~ MASTER PLANAREA
RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL
01 MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL
~.~ ~ MASTER PLAri ,~PPRO'/ED INDUSTRIAL
pI_IP_~IJAi~T TO LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
g ~'~"~ ~ _',',,,4 LAND USE PLAN
TH E CiTY OF
I
I~AN C Il 0 CIICAMONGA
StaffRepor
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda
Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on 9.87 acres of land in the
Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of
the 210 and 1-15 freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-31. Related file: Conditional Use
Permit DRC2003-00048. Staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2003-00047 by adoption of the attached Ordinance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission adopted their Resolution No. 04-43
recommending approval of the Specific Plan Amendment at their April 14, 2004, meeting. At the same
meeting the Commission adopted their Resolution No. 04-44 approving the Conditional Use Permit for
the RV storage facility contingent upon City Council approval of this Amendment. Refer to the attached
Planning Commission staff report for analysis.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot
radius of the project site.
City Planner'
BB:DF:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 2004
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-43
Draft Ordinance Approving Etiwanda Specific Plan DRC2003-00047
THE CITY OF
I~A N C H 0 C II CA Iq 0 N C.A
DATE: April 14, 2004
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, MPA
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to
amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on
9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units per acre),
located at the southwest corner of the 210 and 1-15 freeway interchange -
APN: 0228-011-31.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-
00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to master plan and
develop a RV storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and 1-15
freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-31.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North 210 Interchange; 210 Freeway
South Vacant land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre).
East 1-15 Interchange, 1-15 Interchange.
West Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel; Open Space
B. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Low Residential
North 210 Interchange
South Low Residential
East 1-15 Interchange
West Flood Control/Utility Corridor
C. Site Characteristics: This "landlocked" vacant parcel has no mature trees on the site.
The site has a gentle north to south fall of 28 feet. The 210 and the 1-15 freeway
interchange border the site to the north and east. To the south is vacant land and to the
west is the Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
April 14, 2004
Page 2
D. Parkin.q: There are three parking spaces for clients and the manager caretaker complex.
In addition are five RV and boat spaces that will used as temporary spaces while the
clients negotiate for onsite storage space.
ANALYSIS:
A. Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment: In conjunction with the development proposal, the
applicant is requesting the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended to allow Recreational
and Vehicle (RV) and boat storage at the proposed location. This amendment would
only be in the Low (L) Residential District subject to a Conditional Use Permit and
special development criteria.
Because the applicant's proposed project is bordered by two major freeway systems,
and not directly adjacent to residential uses, staff agrees with the applicant's request.
This location would be better suited for RV and boat storage in comparison to single-
family and multi-family residences, which would be adjacent to the freeways. It is very
dubious that staff would receive any noise complaints caused by the proposed project.
Staff recommends that the language in the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended as follows:
Parr II Chapter 5, 5.22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS:
Add in the "L" District, .202 Other Uses Table, that "Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat
Storage" is a conditionally permitted use with the followinq footnote:.
"Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat Storage is permitted subiect to not beinq ad/acent to
single-family or multiple-family residences, and must be adiacent to both the 210 and 1-15
freeways."
GENERAL:
The project only includes approval of Phase I (see Exhibit "A"). Phase 2, located south of the
project site, is a master plan concept for future development and will require a separate
Conditional Use Permit application and approval. The project, a recreational vehicle and boat
storage facility, contains 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot
office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and
boats.
Access to the landlocked site will be from Victoria Avenue, just west of the 1-15 Freeway, along
a San Bernardino County flood control service road.
A. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building
elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping on July 15, 2003, and January 20,
and February 17, 2004. At the last design review meeting, the Committee (McPhail,
Stewart, Fong) recommended approval subject to design recommendations. A condition
of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been included in the
proposed Resolution of Approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
April 14, 2004
Page 3
B. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on July 15,
2003. The Committee recommended approval. A condition of approval incorporating
the Committee's recommendation has been included in the Resolutions of Approval.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committees reviewed the project
on July 15, 2003, and recommended approval subject to the standard conditions
outlined in the Resolutions of Approval.
D. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff
completed Part II and the Environmental Checklist. It was determined that the project
could have significant adverse environmental impacts to short-term air and water quality
during construction from grading, equipment exhaust, erosion, and water runoff.
Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air and water
quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant
level. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
would be in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 and that it be forwarded to the City
Council for final action. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions of
Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:DF:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit"B" - Building Elevations and Floor Plans
Exhibit"C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Design Review Comments
Exhibit"E" - Applicant's Amendment Justification Letter
Exhibit"F" - Initial Study
Draft Resolution of Approval for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00047
Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048
555
TYPICAL_ COVERED R/V STORAG_F.._PORT PARTIA_L~:_P. LAN
~_.PJCAL COVERED P,/V 8TORAOE PORT REAR / ROADWAY ELEVATION ~_.P~tCAL END ELEVATION
~TYI~.,ICAL COVERED R/V STORAOE PORT FRONT ELEVATION
'~ ENLARra;:n TYPICAL COVERED P,/V STORAGE PORT FRONT ELEVATION A3.~.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 P.M. Doug Fenn February 17, 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT D. RC2003-00048 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to constru(~t a recreational vehicle storage facility on
9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the
southwest corner intemhange of the 210 an,d. 15 Interstate Freeways intemhange -
APN: 0228-011-31.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Para Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Doug Fenn
The applicant requested that the Design Review Committee review the proposed revisions to the
project. He presented revised ~)lans that show the changes as required by the Committee at the
January 20, 2004 meeting. The changes were:
1. A landscape planter is provided along the south property line.
2. The applicant depicted the cl~anges to the rear of the buildings with higher pilasters, the four
decorative elements to be adjacent to each other in a row all facing the 210 Freeway on-ramp
as it merges into the 1-15 Freeway.
3. Additional trees at.the north portion of the property and changes to the Conceptual Landscape
Plan.
The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission with the
condition that the design of the Landscape Plan shall be subjected to City Planner review and
approval.
II
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:10 P.M. Doug Fenn January 20, 2004
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to
construct a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility including a caretaker's quarters on 9.87
acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest
corner interchange of the 210 and 15 Interstate interchange - APN: 0228-011-31.
Background: This project was review by DRC on July 15, 2003 and recommended for revisions.
Attached are the July 15, 2003 DRC Action Comments. The applicant was instructed to work with
Staff and return the project to DRC as a Consent Item. However, Issues still remain and staff is of
the opinion that progress on this project has been with a minimalist approach. Because of this,
Staff is not returning the project as a Consent Item and the below referenced items must be fully
addressed:
,Staff Comments:
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. The covered R.V. storage buildings should stronql¥ "reflect" the amhitectural "elements" of
the caretaker's residence.
2. The building wall along the south property boundary needs to be architecturally treated to
break up the monotonous design or provide a 20-foot landscape area.
3. Provide a Conceptual Landscape Plan showing the density of trees at the north side of the site
as required by the Planning Commission at the Pre-application meeting. Provide sight line
studies and illustrative sections to prove that the area is screened from freeway view.
Secondary Issues.: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide decorative pavement within drive entry threats (outside public right-of-way).
2. Access gates shall be opaque.
3. Provide the dver reck columns to the Detailed Shop.
4. Delete six parking spaces to the west of the project across the manager's office because of
conflict with the entry area.
5. No outdoor lighting shall spill over unto neighboring residential neighborhoods.
6. The applicant shall apply for a Uniform Sign Program.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee address major and secondary
issues and return before the Committee for review.
DESIGN REVIEW L;UMMI:N I ~
8:00 p.m. Doug Fenn July i 5, 2003
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2002-00544-
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct a recreational vehicle storage facility
including a caretaker's quarters on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling
units per acre), located at the southwest corner interchange of the 210 and 1-15 interstate
interchange - APN: 0228-011-31.
Design Parameters: The project is a single phased development. Phase two is located south of the
project site and is a master plan concept for future development. The project, a recreational vehicle
and boat storage facility, contains165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square
foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and
boats.
Access to the site will be via Victoria Avenue. No off site signage will be allowed and staff is
recommending that a. Uniform Sign Program be implemented because of the proximity of the
freeways and single-family residences to the south.
Staff Comments:
Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. The office and caretaker unit has a colonnade on the west and south sides with some dry
stack vertical elements. Because the site is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, the
building design should reflect a historic craftsman/bungalow style. Provide decorative
treatment and elements such as but not limited to battered shape fiver rock columns,
dormers, rafter tails, triangular braced supports, sidings, molding trim around windows, river
rock wainscot around the unit, and other rasidential elements to compliment the neighboring
residences to the west. Use flat tile for the roof instead of metal.
2. The covered R.V storage buildings should better reflect the architectural elements of the
caretaker's residence. The proposed surface material treatment nextto the 4-foot recessed
area should wrap to the recessed area. The material should be of river rock. Provide the
same river rock columns treatment to the ends of each covered storage building,
3. The building wall along the south property boundary needs to be architecturally treated to
break up the monotonous design or provide a 20-foot landscape area.
4. Provide a Conceptual Landscape Plan showing the density of trees at the north side of the
site as required by the Planning Commission at the Pre-application meeting. Provide sight
line studies and illustrative sections to proof that the area is screened from freeway view.
~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. provide decorative pavement within drive entry throats (outside public right-of-way).
2. Access gates shall be opaque.
3. Provide the river rock columns to the Detailed Shop.
DRC COMMEN¥~
DRC2003-00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
July 15, 2003
Page 2 =
4. Delete 6 parking spaces to the west of the project across the manager's office becau~se of
conflict with entry area.
5. No outdoor lighting shall spill over unto neighboring rf~sidential neighborhoods.
6. Applicant shall apply for a Uniform Sign Program.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee address major and secondary
issues and come back before the Committee for review.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Pam Stewart, Christine McPhail, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Doug Fenn
The applicant agreed to address the identified major and secondary design issues of the staff
comments. Staff stated n the meet ng that item no. 6 of the secondary issues would be taken~ care
of as a condition of approval. The Committee asked the applicant to provide a vertical element
treattnent to the recessed area for the covered RV storage building. The Committee directed the
applicant to work with staff in revising the plans to address all the identified issues. Once staff
determined that the revised plans have satisfactorily addressed the identified issues, then the
project could be forwarded back as a Consent Item.
Charles Jos_ _ph Associates
PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES
January 14, 2003
Brad Suller, City Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. BOX 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Re: Crossroads 210/15 Freeway R. V. Storage Facility
Request to Amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan
Dear Brad:
This is as a follow-up to a number of meetings and conversations with you,
Planning staff and City Pre-Application Review concerning the referenced matter.
This correspondence is to formalize our request that the Etiwanda Specific Plan
be amended to allow Recreational Vehicle/Self Storage as a permitted use in
Residential Zoning where the site is generally surrounded by freeway and flood
control facilities.
The proposed project is located at the SWC of the 210/15 Freeway Interchange
and east and adjacent the County Flood Control channel. Existing freeway and
interchange improvements generally surrounds the site on the north, east and
south. The property is zoned for Residential Land Use, however the site is
unsuitable for residential housing due to flood control channel and freeway
impacts that would be associated with any residential development at this site.
Our intention is to design and construct a full service Recreational Vehicle
Storage facility and to our knowledge, there are no existing facilities offering this
type of service in Rancho Cucamonga. This proposed use would be very
compatible with the existing residential uses located west of the flood control
channel, as our site access would be taken from Victoria Street and north into the
site using County Flood Control access roads. The proposed project will be open
seven days a week from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with restricted card key access
available until 8:00 p.m. for business tenants. This proposed project has been
reviewed with existing residents west of the site and has received favorable
response and preference over any additional residential development.
As you may be aware, driving and recreational vehicle travel has hit new demand
levels, and is currently the preferred mode of travel for security and convenience.
We also believe that this project will be a positive addition to the City and provide
a level of service and convenience that is needed in this community and should
serve to help reduce on-street recreational vehicle parking in the City.
Office 909e481-1822 800-240,1822 Fax 909e481e1824
City Center · 10681 Foothill Blvd., Suite 395 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 91730
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
As you will recall, this proposed project received favorable response by the
Planning Commission at the July 16, 2002, Pre-Application Review, and the
project design submitted to the City as part of this Design/Development Review
process is with the intent to incorporate this City feedback into this project.
We appreciate the continuing professional courtesy and assistance extended by
City Planning with our proposed project. Please feel free to contact me at your
earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional
information or assistance with this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles J. Buquet
Charles Joseph Associates
552-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JAN ~ ~ 2.003 ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
RECEIVED-PLANNING (Part I - Initial Study)
C, ily o~ Rancho Cucamo~e (Please type or ptfnt cleatfy using f~k. Use itte tab key to move from one line to lhe next line.)
(909) 477-2750
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pumuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and
Guidelines; the Califomia Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and
Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this
application be provided in full.
INCOMPLETE APPUCA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Ploase note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to pedotm work required to provide missing
information.
Application Number for the projec~ to which thi~ fon~ pertains: Pre-application filed July 16, 2002 DRC 2002-00544
Project TrEe: Crossroads R.V. Stoml~e
Name & Address of project owner(s): Bruno Mancinelli
7285 SVL Box, V'~towflle, CA 02392
Name & Address of developer or project sponsoc Charles Joseph Associates
10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Contact Person & Address: Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates
10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Narne & Address of person prepartng this form (if different from above): As shown above, Chades Joseph Associates
J~"" Talephone NumbeC. 909481-1822
Envi, Info. fo~m RC Created on 12./2./2002 4:40 PM
Information indicated by an asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's un/ess otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the ~SGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the
site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant
features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph.
3) Project Location (descdhe): Southwest of 210-15 Freeway Interchange
4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (eftach additional sheet if necessary): 0228-011-31-000
*5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 9.86 +/-
*6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed
dedications): 9.86
7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site
(attach additional sheet ff necessary):
Specific Plan Amendment to allow recreational vehicle/self storage as a permitted use in residential zone
where site is generally surrounded by freeway and flood control channels.
Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucarnonga and other
governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project:
Grading and Building Permits
9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and reads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any
existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use ofthe structures. Attach photographs of
significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies,
biotic and archeological suP/eys, traffic studies):
Currently vacant land with weeds/vegetation on site. There are no stuctures. See attached Biological Study
performed on November 24, 2002.
Envi. Info. form RC Created on 12/2/2002 4:40 PM
10) Desc#be the known cuitural and/or histodcal aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published
reports and oral history):
There are no known historical or cultural aspects on this site.
11) Descrtbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (eircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will
affect proposed uses:
Existing roadway and freeway noise that will not affect proposed use of property.
12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate
use that will result from the proposed project, indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of
development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)
if necessary:
RecreatJonial Vehicle Storage Facility consisting of surface storage stalls as well as car port storage
facilities. Maintenance/service bays, on site office and caretaker residential facility.
Envi. Info. form RC Created on 12/2_.~2002 4:40 PM
13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity ofland use (one-family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.):
North-210 Freeway
South-Undeveloped properlies owned by County Flood Control
East-15 Freeway
West-Undeveloped re~dential zoned property
14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, sca~ or character of the surrounding general area of the project ?
No, this project will enhance the area that is currently vacant land. The property is currently zoned for
residential RI, This project use will have less impact then residential and is a needed use for the area.
15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these
noise levels affect adjacent prcperties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed?
Short term construction noise only, no long term impacts.
'16) Indicate prcpesed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees:
None
f 7) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains:
County of San Bemardino Flood Control Facility directly west of and adjacent to project.
Envi. Info. form RC Created on 12/2/2002 4:40
Preliminary meeting with the Director of County Flood Control has determined they are amenable to
having our proiect site directly drain into their existing channel.
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage esfimates). For forther clarification, please
contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day)
b. Commercial/Ind. (gaYday/ac) 3,000 Peak use (gaYmin/ac) 6,000
19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. [] Septic Tank [] Sewer.
If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolabbn tests, ff discharge to a sanitary sewage syste~n is proposed indicate
expected daily sewage generation: (See A~tachment A for usage estimates). Forfu~ther clarification, please contact
the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day)
b. CommerciaYlndustrial (gal/day/ac) 2000
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units: N,/A
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A
Attached (indicate whether units ara rental or for sale units):
N/A
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents:
Sale Price(s) $_ to $.
Rent (per month) $. to $
22) Spec/fy number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:
N/A
Envt Info. form RC Created on 12/2/2002 4:40 PM(~T)~ 7
24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the apprep~fate
School Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary: nl._~a
b. Junior High:
c, Senior High
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Descdbetype~fuse(s)andmaj~rfuncti~n(s)~fc~mmercia~~industda~~rinstituti~na~uses:
Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility with maintenance faciliites and on site office/caretaker residence.
26) Totalflooraraaofcommercial, industdal, orinstitutionalusesbytype:
Office/caretaker 1,200 square feet-Vehicle Detail Area 1,800 square feet
Storage Area 101,096 square feet
27) Indicate hours of operation:
7 Days a week
Office/Caretaker 8 A.M. to 6:P.M. Card Key Access for tenants until 8:00 PM
26) Numberofemployees: Total: 3
Maximum Shift: 8
Time of Maximum Shift:
29) Previde breakdown of anticipatedjob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate
of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
One On Site Caretaker, Two maintenance staff.
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: unknown at this time
'31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be
verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6263):
RV Traffic in and out of the facility, Access to site will be via County Flood Control Frontage Roads from
Victoria Street.
Envi. info. form RC Created on 12/2/2002 4:40 PM(.~ ~..~
ALL PROJECTS
32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to
provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response.
All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide adequate sen/ice to the project site.
33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials?
Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides
and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the
above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates
of use, if known.
No
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
mafarials, including but not limifad to those examples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such matedals to
be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall
be shown and labeled on the application plans.
Regular vehicle maintenance materials such as an above ground hoist, oils, solvents, batteries.
Materials will be disposed of by a Ucensed Hauler. Business operations will be conducted consistent with all
applicable standards and requirements.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
tot he best of my knowledge and belie~ I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an
adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Date: 1/13/02 Signature: ~
President
T'~e:
Envi. Info. form RC Created on 12/2/2002 4:40 PM~,~
View to north from western properly boundan/
View to nortt~ near southeastern corner of properly
plate ~
S#e Photographs
,-- * E ,-~ c [ ~ 12-acre Site
November 2002
Dense stands of ~P.~u~ ~eilobata
View to east from near center of site
Etiwanda Flood Control Channel (concrete-lined)
View to south along western properly boundary
~o, o¢., ~,,, Stte Photographs
c. ~ e ~ ,,: F- ~ 12-acre Site
November 2002
City OF RANCHO CIJCIIMOIV~
JAN 1 ~ 2003
RECE/VEo. PLA/VN/N(~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Etiwanda Specific Plan DRC2003-00047 and Conditional Use Permit
DRC2003-00048
2. Related Files: None
3. Description of Project:
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
- A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on
9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the
southwest corner of the 210 Freeway and 1-15 interchange - APN: 0228-011-31.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A master
plan request to construct a RV storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District
(2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 Freeway and the 1-15
interchange - APN: 0228-011-31.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Charles Joseph Associates
10681 Foothill Blvd., Suite 395
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings):
The 210 Freeway off-ramp bounds the site to the north, which transitions into the 1-15 on-ramp to
the east. To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of
the proposed project (but is not part of this proposal). To the west of the site is a flood control
channel, and single-family homes beyond. The subject site is vacant with an overall fal~ of 28 feet
from north of the property to the south. There is no significant vegetation on the site and no
improvements.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Douglas Fenn
(909) 477-2750
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 2
10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement):
Access road rights from San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report:
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
NOx - Nitrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
PM~o - Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
( ) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality
) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology/Soils
Hazards & Hazardous (x) Hydrology/Water Quality ( ) Land Use/Planning
Materials ( ) Noise ( ) Population/Housing
Mineral Resources ( ) Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic
Public Services ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
Utilities/Service Systems
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or
agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
() I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
() I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 3
mitigated pursuant to that/~arlier E~,,~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that a~_ j~pose,~'ul:~on]the proposed project, nothing further is required,
Prepared By: Douglas Fenn ~~ : ~ Date: ~ '/~'4
Reviewed By' Dan Colom Date: ¢--/q--~ -
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 4
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significanl No
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,")
b) Substantially damage scenic resoumes, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic Highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new soume of substantial light or glare which ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within
a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15.
b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State
Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
c) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the 1-15 on-
ramp to the east. To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a
future phase of the proposed project (but is not part of this proposal). To the west of the
site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond. The subject site is
vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south. There is no
significant vegetation on the site and no improvements. The visual quality of the area will
not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City
standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities
to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in
accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said
Resolution.
d) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The
design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for
consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to
avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to
within the project site. The impact is not considered significant.
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ('") ( )
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resoumes Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( )
Williamson Act contract?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 5
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiatly With Than
Significant Mifigafion Significant NO
Irr~oact Incorporated Impact Impact
C) Involve other changes in the existing environment I () I () () (v')
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
I
conversion of Farm and, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance. The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which
transitions into the 1-15 on-ramp to the east. To the south is vacant land which the
applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed project (but is not part of
this proposal). To the west of the site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes
beyond. The subject site is vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property
to the south. There is no significant vegetation on the site and no improvements. There
are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is
either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The
major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern
portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further,
two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30
acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be
retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR
identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse
impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was ultimately
adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for
which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no
Williamson Act contracts within the City.
c) The site is not farmland. The nearest agricultural use (vineyard) is more than 1 mile
southwest from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (,,') ( ) ( )
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
number of people?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 6
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Tnar~
Comments:
a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to
the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and
State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as
a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding
Considerations conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed
project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts
evaluated.
b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty
construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate
emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and
construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site,
smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the
surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area.
Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their
tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again.
Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho
Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing
air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required
to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a
project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented
to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels:
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition
so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per
manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit
construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow
emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also
conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as
City Planning Staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high volume, Iow-pressure spray.
4)All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in $CAQMD
Rule 1108.
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.
Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and
watering.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 7
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
Impact h',c,~, ~ a[ed ~mpact Impact
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over
extended periods of time.
· Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil
during and after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
· Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is
carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of
hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover
payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved
by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to
reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or
more to reduce PM10 emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air
quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General P~an FEIR (Section
5.6). Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General
Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance;
therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project
basis to a level less than significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the 'citywide
increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement
of Overriding Considerations Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant
operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table
5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they
cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant. The fotlowing
mitigation measures shall be implemented:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003~00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 8
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks
shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for
vanpools.
12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water
heaters.
13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate
thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR
identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable
adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was
ultimately adopted by the City Council.
c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute
to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and
State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as
a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations
Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is
consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of
pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive
receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers,
retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic
facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant
impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air
contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. According to the SCAQMD, projects
have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of
sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule
1401. The project site is located within less than 1/4 mile from the nearest sensitive
receptor: single-family residences to the west across a flood control channel. Potential
impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element
within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility
of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed
under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels.
e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are
anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003~00048 Page 9
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Titan
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State
habitat conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The project site is located in an area developed with homes, freeways, and flood control
facilities. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed
abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General
Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources;
therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or
animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is
consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan.
b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian
habitat exists on site, meaning the project will not have any impacts.
c) No wetland habitat is present on site. As a result, project implementation would have no
impact on these resources.
d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting
any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 10
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Signi f~c~.nt Mitigation Significant NO
e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in
conflict with any local ordinance.
f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan,
Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation
plans will occur.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ~ ) (v')
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064.57
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ('") ( ) 0
significance of an amheological resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (*./) ( ) ( )
resoume or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resoume" per the standards of
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be
no impact.
b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the project site;
however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native
Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity,
particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate
existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall
be implemented:
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during
grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor
construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve
them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will:
· Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its
archaeological value.
· Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of
archaeological sites within new developments, using their special
qualities as a theme or focal point.
· Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage,
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 11
[*eSS Tha~
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Than
· Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to
eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
· Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the
inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the
project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original
illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information
Center for permanent archiving.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on
an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological
sites or resoumes have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the
sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity
rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been
deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the
Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the
appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The
project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore,
the following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the
project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also
provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e.,
paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation
monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the
following measures:
· Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid
removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time
during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
· Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert
earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed
salvage, if construction personnel make the discovery, the grading
contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor
of the find.
· Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected
specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum.
d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The
project site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement. No known
religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 12
Significant Less
issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially With Titan
Significant Mitigation Significant No
impact incorporated Impact Impact
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the projec~.
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( )
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (,-')
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
Comments:
a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in
the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the
General Plan Exhibit V-l, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault,
passes within 1.5 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies
approximately 2.25 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing M~, 6.0-7.0
earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw7.5 earthquakes is 5
miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is
7 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking.
Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than
significant.
b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during
September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion
problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown
sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this
project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area
as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 13
Less Than
Significant Less
Imoact Incorporated Impact Impact
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
S~gnif~cant Mitigation Significant No
fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-
significant levels:
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved
by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with
SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by
the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-
site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to
minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or
more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated
with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not
withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous
area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure
5.1-2. Soil types onsite consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand and Soboba Gravelly
Loamy Sand soil associations according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse
impacts are anticipated.
d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil
deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types onsite
consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand and Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand soil
associations according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3.
These soils are typically excessively or somewhat excessively drained nearly level to
moderately sloping soil on alluvial fans. Runoff is slow to very slow, and the hazard of soil
blowing is moderate to high on bare soil. In unprotected area, however, the hazard of soil
blowing is high. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for
wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed.
7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 14
Signilieam Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Titan
Significant Mitigation Significant No
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (-,,')
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The
City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service
Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The
City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard
Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State,
and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or
waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No
adverse impacts are expected.
b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels.
The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service
Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The
City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard
Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State,
and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or
volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level Jess than significant.
No adverse impacts are anticipated.
c) The Etiwanda High school is to the southwest of the project is just over a 1/4 of a mile
from the project site. However, this type of project will not generate students due to the
fact that it is a RV storage facility. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site.
Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping
of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 15
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~en~i~y with Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 4 miles of a public
airport. Project site is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is
offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airetrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west
of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies
and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of
a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is
required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no
adverse impacts are anticipated.
h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban
Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District
Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the preposed project site is not located within a high
fire hazard area according to Generel Plan Exhibit V-7.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a)' Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) ( ) (./)
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete greundwater supplies or interfere ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
substantially with groundwater recharge such that
there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would
drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of sudace runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or previde substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
g) Place housing within a lO0-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
g77
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 16
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Tha~
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/')
Comments:
a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD)
and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Project is
designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems.
b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground
water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that
estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete
groundwater supplies, nor will it intedere with recharge because it is not within an area
designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit
IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation;
however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet
below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued
development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however,
CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water
facilities. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented:
1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into
the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to
minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast
concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders,
seepage pits, and recharge basins.
c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river.
All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to
prevent erosion. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official
and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered
significant.
d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river.
All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official
and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from
the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Than
proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities,
which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by
the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore,
increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are
anticipated.
f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary
increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm
event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The following mitigation measures
shall be implemented:
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City
Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including
a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that
will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the
maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-
structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and
Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000.
3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the
City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General
Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control
Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste
Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit.
g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected.
h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General
Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system
designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and
provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing
system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds,
concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit
V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to
General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected.
j) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from
seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of
the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain
streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow
impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes
several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and
north of the City.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 18
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to, a general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
or natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
a) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the 1-15 on-
ramp to the east. To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a
future phase of the proposed project (but is not part of this proposal). To the west of the
site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond. The subject site is
vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south. There is no
significant vegetation on the site and no improvements. The project will become a part of
the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
b) The project site land use designation is Low Residential. A Specific Plan amendment is
proposed to allow this type of use on the property. This use may be more suitable than
residential because the site is adjacent to the 210 and 1-15 intemhange. With the
allowance of the Specific Plan Amendment, the proposed project would be consistent with
the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As
such, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan
area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan
FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resoumes; therefore,
development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due
to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Plan.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) '(,,') ( )
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
a/b) The southerly portion of the site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources
Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan,
Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1. The site's small size and access through residential areas
makes mining impractical, and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery due to
conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surface mining
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 19
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially W~ih Than
Significant Mitigation Signiticant NO
operations. Conversely, the open flood control basin to the south offers greater aggregate
mining opportunities. The impact is considered less than significant.
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (.~')
groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( )
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) ( ) ( )
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to
General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out; however, the proposed storage use would not
expose large numbers of people to noise. The project site is almost at the same elevation
as the freeway transition lane from the 210 Freeway to the 1-15. The construction of these
buildings will act as an additional sound barrier for the residential neighborhood to the
west. The storage use will not produce excessive noise. The primary source of noise
affecting the project is traffic from Route 210 and 1-15 Freeways. At build-out in the year
2020, future noise levels are estimated to be 65dBA and 60dBA within 1,464 feet and
3,155 feet, respectively, of the centerline of the 210 Freeway according to General Plan
Table V-6. At build-out, future noise levels are estimated to be 65dBA and 60dBA within
1,991 feet and 4,288 feet, respectively, of the centerline of the 1-15 Freeway. This
estimated noise level exceeds the City Noise standard that specifies that exterior living
areas shall not exceed 60dBA and the interior living space shall not exceed 45dBA,
between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Therefore, the following mitigation measures are
required for the manager's apartment for the storage facility:
1) A noise study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer prior to issuance of
building permits. The report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below 45dBA, the building materials and construction
techniques provided. The interior noise standard is to be met with windows
and doors closed. Therefore, ventilation is needed in order to provide a
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 20
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmentially With Than
habitable environment. The building plans will be checked for conformance
with the mitigation measures contained in the study.
2) The applicant shall submit certification from the acoustical engineer that all
recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction,
including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document
compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the
Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the manager's
apartment.
The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site
stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will
generate noise exceeding City standards. The residential tract to the west that is currently
under construction includes a tall sound attenuation wall along the flood control channel.
The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts:
3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.
and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday.
4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified
in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line.
Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times
may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their
findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels
exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the
Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then
construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance
with above noise standards or halted.
5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first
phase.
The preceding mitigation measures wiJl reduce the disturbance created by on-site
construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts due to the
transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall
then be required:
6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed
100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the
developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction
traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes
that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce groundborne
vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 21
Significent Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
c) The primary soume of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The
proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to
increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project.
d) See a) response above.
e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 4 miles of a public
airport. Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north
of the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west
of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would theprojecC
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) .(,,.')
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
necessitating the construction of repJacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population
growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new
employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited
number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a
majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding
communities. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected.
c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated~
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 22
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith 'G3an
d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
Comments:
a) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the 1-15 on-
ramp to the east. To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a
future phase of the proposed project (but is not part of this proposal). To the west of the
site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond. The subject site is
vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south. There is no
significant vegetation on the site and no improvements. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in
the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard
conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the
project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated.
b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change
the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in
property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled.
c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the
Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay school fees
as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are
anticipated.
d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
existing Etiwanda Creek Community park is located about 1 mile to the northwest of the
project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration
of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the
need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the
developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area,
currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in
the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative
development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services.
According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library
space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan
FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable
adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was
ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption
of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens
regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 sqbare feet, which is in excess of the
projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 23
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially W~th Than
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Comments:
a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Community Park, is about 1 mile northwest from the project
site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that
would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard
condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts
are anticipated.
b) See a) response above.
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢')
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Comments:
a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to
the traffic Icad in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 24
$i~ificant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is
in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in
project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle
trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to
provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the
site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation
Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits.
Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic
cimulation. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The project will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour trips; therefore, is below the
threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring
a traffic impact analysis. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street
improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service
standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street
improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts
are anticipated.
c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of
the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide
street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The
project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming
uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a
design feature. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will
therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated.
f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking
capacity. No impacts are anticipated.
g) The project site is landlocked; hence, the proposed development will not conflict with
alternative transportation goals.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects.?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 25
Significant Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With T'nar~
~ignificant Mitigation Significant NO
Irr~oact Incorporated [n~oact [n~oact
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,')
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system,
which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant
located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of
the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts
are anticipated.
b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system,
which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant
located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of
which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Aha
Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated.
c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official
and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered
significant.
d) The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. There is
currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve
this project. No impacts are anticipated.
e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system,
which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant
located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of
which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated.
f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes
the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste
disposal needs.
g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding
solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction
procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 26
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With T~an
17, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/)
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City
of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the
site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely
that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site.
b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop
the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001
General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of
Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations for significant adverse
environmental effects of buildout in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made
findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to
aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library
services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for
each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant
levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations
Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update
against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and
15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use
projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space.
With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations, no
further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.
c) Development of the site with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study
identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially
significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels.
Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 27
construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant
impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation
measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant
levels.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section
15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately
analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses
were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(v') General Plan FEIR
(SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001)
(v') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(,") industrial Area Specific Plan EIR
(Certified September 19, 1981)
(-") Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR
(SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994)
(,/) Biological Assessment (Ecological Sciences, November 24, 2002)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 Page 28
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.
Prepared By: ~ Date: '~__~/~'
Print Name and Title: (~'~, ~L~/-'~~ ''''
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for pub#c review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047
Public Review Period Closes: May 19, 2004
Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of the 210 and 1-15 freeway
interchange - APN: 0228-011-31
Project Description: A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage on the southwest
parcel of 9.87 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and to master plan and
develop a RV storage facility on that site. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
May 19, 2004
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO. 0443
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 TO ALLOW
RECREATIONAL AND BOAT STORAGE ON 9.87 ACRES OF LAND IN THE
LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF THE 210 AND 1-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE; AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0228-011-31
A. Recitals.
1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2003-00047, as described in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on Apdl 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The proposed amendment applies to properties located within the Low Residential
District within the Etiwanda community; and
b. The proposed amendment will not a have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The application is in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application
DRC2003-00048 to permit RV and boat storage on the subject site; and
d. The proposed amendment contemplates allowing RV and boat storage facilities
within the Low Residential District.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-43
DRC2003-00047 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
Apd114, 2004
Page 2
b. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
amendment will not have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2004-00047 by the adoption of this Resolution recommending approval of the attached
Ordinance by the City Council.
6. ' The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Richard Macias, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-43
DRC2003-00047 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
Apd114,2004
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of April 2004, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MAClAS, McNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF THE 210 AND 1-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0228-011-31
A. Recitals.
1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00047, as described in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted their
Resolution No. 04-43 recommending approval.
3. On May 19, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on May f 9, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to preper[y located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit to allow RV and boat
storage on the subject site; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 04-
DRC2003-00047 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
April 19, 2004
Page 2
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for
the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as
follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during
the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby approves the amendment subject to the text change as listed below:
Part II Chapter 5, 5.22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS:
Add in the"L " Dist 'nct, .202 Other Uses Table, that "Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat Storage" is
a conditionally permitted use with the following footnote:
"Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat Storage is permitted subject to not being adjacent to single-
family or multiple-family residences, and must be adjacent to both the 210 and I- 15 freeways."
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 04-
DRC2003-00047 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
April 19, 2004
Page 3
6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any
reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or
unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A
]~NCINE EI~ING DE PAI~TMENT
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO' Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Approval of the Measure I Expenditure Plan prepared by SANBAG for
majority approval by SANBAG's membership to place the measure on the
November 2, 2004 ballot
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council adopt Resolution No. 04-153 to approve the Expenditure
Plan for the revenues expected to be derived from the proposed continuation of Measure I,
San Bemardino County's one-half of one pement sales tax for transportation
improvements, tentatively scheduled for voter consideration on November 2, 2004 and
direct staff to forward the signed and dated resolution to San Bernardino Associated
Governments by May 28, 2004.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
San Bernardino County voters approved Measure I, the County's one-half of one percent
transactions and use tax for transportation improvements, in November 1989. Since its
inception, Measure I has provided funding for numerous transportation projects, including
freeways, local roads, major streets, interchanges, the Metrolink commuter train system,
public buses, traffic signals, and more. Measure I will expire in 2010, and a proposal is
underway to continue the existing tax.
San Bemardino Associated Governments, in its function as the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority, has been working with private sector stakeholders and city and
County representatives to prepare an Expenditure Plan for the revenues expected to be
derived from the continued Measure I tax, together with anticipated federal and state funds.
This measure is anticipated to be placed on the November 2, 2004 ballot.
If approved by voters, Measure I would authorize the collection of a one-half of one percent
sales tax for a 30-year period from 2010 to 2040, generating an anticipated total of $6
billion for local transportation projects, without raising additional taxes. These funds would
CItY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF THE MEASURE I EXPENDITURE PLAN
MAY 19, 2004
PAGE 2
remain in San Bernardino County and could not be borrowed or suspended by the state or
federal governments for any reason. A million more people are projected to live in San
Bemardino County by 2030, and Measure I will help fight traffic congestion with a long-term
funding source for freeways, highways, major streets, local streets, passenger trains and
bus fare discounts for seniors and persons with disabilities. Measure I will help improve
road access for emergency responders, such as police, fire and ambulance services and
will help repair badly deteriorated roads countywide. Measure I also will help boost San
Bernardino County's economy by providing construction-related jobs and manufacturing
jobs and by making the area more attractive to businesses that need an effective
transportation network for its employees and customers. Annual financial audits and an
Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee will ensure that funds are spent appropriately.
The Measure I Expenditure Plan ("Plan") specifies the allocation of tax revenue countywide
for the new measure, which would take effect upon the expiration of the current measure in
2010. Key elements of the Plan are as follows:
· The Plan retains the six county subareas and directs revenues generated from each
subarea to be expended on transportation projects of direct benefit to that subarea.
· Within the San Bernardino Valley Subarea, the funds collected from this subarea
would be used for projects of direct benefit to the Valley, using the following formula:
o 29% Freeway projects
o 11% Freeway interchange projects
o 20% Major street projects
020% Local street projects (Returned to local jurisdictions for priority
projects)
o 8% Metrolink/rail service
o 8% Senior and disabled transit service
o 2% Express bus/bus rapid transit service
o 2% Traffic management systems (signal synchronization, commuter
assistance, etc.)
· The Plan further would reserve 3% of the revenue generated in both the San
Bernardino Valley Subarea and the Victor Valley Subarea for improvements to the
Cajon Pass, which are critical for intra-county travel for residents of both subareas.
· As in the current Measure I, the Plan provides for all future development to pay its
fair share for needed transportation facilities as a result of the new development. No
Measure I revenue would be used to replace the fair share contributions required
from new development.
· The Plan also contains a requirement for annual financial audits of each jurisdiction's
expenditure of Measure I funds and establishment of an Independent Taxpayer
Oversight Committee.
San Bemardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bemardino County
Transportation Authority, approved the Expenditure Plan on May 5, 2004 for circulation and
approval by member jurisdictions. Public Utilities Code section 180206 requires that the
Expenditure Plan be approved by the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the
cities representing a majority of the population. Upon receipt of these approved resolutions,
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF THE MEASURE I EXPENDITURE PLAN
MAY 19, 2004
PAGE 3
the SANBAG Board of Directors will take action to adopt the final Expenditure Plan and to
request that the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors place the Measure on the
November 2, 2004 ballot.
The SANBAG Board of Directors, working with private sector stakeholders and city and
County representatives, developed the Measure I Expenditure Plan over the past year and
has approved it for circulation to the member jurisdictions.
Adoption of this Resolution will have no financial impact. Approval of the continuation of
Measure I by San Bernardino County voters will result in $6 billion in transportation revenue
countywide for the 30-year term. A total of $1.3 billion would be allocated to the
Mountain/Desert Subareas, $4.5 billion would be allocated to the San Bernardino Valley
Subarea, and $.17 billion would be allocated for improvements to the Cajon Pass. A total of
$92.7 million would be allocated specifically to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for local
transportation projects. As with the current Measure I program, the City would have
discretion to determine which local projects to pursue. A sample of such projects that the
City has initiated and/or completed, as well as future planned projects, is listed below:
COMPLETED PROJECTS AND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
· Milliken Avenue Street Widening (north of Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue)
· Carnelian Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements (south of Vivero Street to
19th Street)
· Day Creek Boulevard (west side from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue)
· Foothill Boulevard/Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain, Median, and Bridge (Foothill
Boulevard - Da,~ Creek Channel to Hermosa Avenue; Hermosa Avenue - Foothill
Boulevard to 19'" Street)
· Haven Avenue Street Widening (west side from Church Street to Base Line Road)]
FUTURE PLANNED PROJECTS
· 6th Street Storm Drain and Street Improvements (east of Archibald Avenue to
railroad crossing)
· Grove Avenue Street Widening (Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard)
· Hermosa Avenue Street Widening (Highland Avenue to Banyan Street)
· Wilson Avenue Extension (Wardman Bullock Road to East Avenue)
· Various Pavement Rehabilitation Projects (majodsecondary arterials, collectors,
local streets)
It is recommended that Council adopt Resolution No. 01-153 to approve the Expenditure
Plan for the revenues expected to be derived from the proposed continuation of Measure I,
San Bernardino County's one-half of one percent sales tax for transportation
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF THE MEASURE I EXPENDITURE PLAN
MAY 19, 2004
PAGE 4
improvements, tentatively scheduled for voter consideration on November 2, 2004 and
direct staff to forward the signed and dated resolution to San Bernardino Associated
Governments by May 28, 2004.
Respectfully Submitted,
Wi~l~m J. O'Neil
City Engineer
RESOLUTION NO. 04-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE THE
MEASURE I EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR REVENUES
EXPECTED TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROPOSED
CONTINUATION OF MEASURE I, SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY'S ONE-HALF OF ONE PERCENT TRANSACTIONS
AND USE TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the citizens of San Bemardino County approved passage of Measure I in
November 1989 authorizing San Bemardino Associated Governments, acting as the San
Bemardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent transactions
and use tax for transportation improvements, applicable in the incorporated and
unincorporated territory of the County of San Bemardino, and
WHEREAS, Measure I has provided funding for numerous transportation projects,
including freeways, local roads, major streets, interchanges, the Metrolink commuter train
system, public buses, traffic signals, and more; and
WHEREAS, the imposition of the one-half of one pement transactions and use tax is set
to expire in 2010, and
WHEREAS, San Bemardino Associated Governments, working with private sector
stakeholders and city and County representatives, has prepared an Expenditure Plan for the
revenues expected to be derived from the proposed continuation of Measure I, which is
anticipated to be placed on the November 2, 2004 ballot, and
WHEREAS, if approved by the voters, Measure I would authorize the collection of a one-
half of one percent sales tax for a 30-year period from 2010 to 2040, generating an anticipated
total of $6 billion for local transportation projects, and
WHEREAS, if approved by the voters, Measure I would not institute a new tax, but
continue the existing one-half of one percent sales tax for transportation, and
WHEREAS, revenues raised from the continuation of Measure I would remain in San
Bemardino County and could not be borrowed by the state or federal government, and
WHEREAS, Measure I would provide a long-term funding source to help fight traffic
congestion; improve local streets, major roads and highways; and enhance San Bemardino
County's economy by providing construction-related jobs, manufacturing jobs, and an
effective transportation system to meet the needs of residents and the business community, and
WHEREAS, Public Utilities Code section 180206 requires that the Measure I Expenditure
Plan be approved by the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities representing
a majority of the population.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, hereby approves the Measure I Expenditure Plan developed by the Board
of Directors of San Bemardino Associated Governments, acting as the
San Bemardino County Transportation Authority. (Attachment "A")
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 19th day of May 2004.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk
R A N C H O C U c A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: May 19, 2004
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Central Park:
· We have a building! Trusses have been placed and framing along with placement of the
mechanical, electrical and plumbing work in the walls is continuing. On site grading and
placement of berms is continuing. Underground work for the street signals and lights, as
well as the installation of sidewalks along Base Line, has been completed. Installation of the
curb and islands in the north parking lot has begun.
Senior and Community Center - Rolling Trusses
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Pouring Curb and Gutter along the interior road at Central Park
Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project:
· The Landscape Contractor, American Landscape, started work on May 3ru, and will be
working along side the General Contractor, Douglas Barnhart, in the placement of the
sleeves and irrigation system.
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Project:
· Work has been proceeding very well. Ali levels of the west structure will be poured by May
20, and work has begun on constructing the elevator tower. Slab on grade work has been
completed on the east structure and the deck pours are scheduled to begin in early June.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· The Senior Center will host a Mother's Da,/Brunch on Saturday, May 8, 2004, at 11:00 a.m.
We will honor those mothers and grandmothers that are unable to share this special day
with their children. Come join us for warm company, good food, and great entertainment.
Reservations are required as seating is limited.
· The V.I.P. Club will help raise funds for the new James L. Brulte Senior Center at their
annual Parkin,q Lot Sale at the Senior Center on Saturday, May 15, 2004, starting at 7:00
a.m.
· Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, May 24, 9:00 a.m.
at the Senior Center.
Human Services:
· Homeowners and Renters Rebate - Volunteers from AARP will soon be preparing
homeowners and renters rebate forms for all members of the community every Tuesday and
Thursday, from 12:30 - 4:30 p.m., through July 29. Appointments are not necessary; guests
will be assisted on a first come, first served basis. Please call (909) 477-2780 for more
information.
· Resoumes Directories - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center distributes three resources
directories for your reference, the Community Resource Directory, Senior Housing Directory,
and The Child Care Directory. Please call (909) 477-2780 for more information.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Trips and Tours:
· The Getty with lunch at Lawry's Prime Rib, June 5, 2004. We'll travel to the original Lawry's
Prime Rib restaurant where you'll enjoy a 3-coume meal including your choice of Prime Rib
or Salmon. Then it's off to the Getty museum, where the tour starts with a tram ride to the
summit, taking in unexpected views of historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum you can
watch a brief orientation film. From there you are free to experience all the Getty has to
offer at your own pace. Cost: $43.00 per person.
· "The Marriaqe of Fiqaro" ("Le Nozze de Fiqaro"), June 19, 2004. Ride with us to the
beautiful Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, home of the Los Angeles Opera, to enjoy the famous
opera, "Le nozze di Figaro" by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Before the show, we'll enjoy a
buffet dinner at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion catered by Patina Catering and continue to
the Grand Hall for an entertaining and informative presentation about "Le nozze di Figaro".
Then it's off to the show! From the opening notes of Mozart's masterpiece to the final
curtain, "Le nozze di Figaro" is a fast-paced tour de force with a poignant dramatic ending.
The Count's wandering eye has landed on Figaro's bride-to-be, and Figaro must do some
quick thinking if he's going to get her to the altar before the Count makes his move. In the
end, though, it's the women who out-scheme the men, saving the day and humbling a
husband. New production stars Operalia winners Isabel Bayrakdarian and Erwin Schrott as
Susanna and Figaro with Veronique Gens making her Company debut as the Countess.
Performed in Italian with English supertitles. Cost: $98.00 per person.
Volunteer Services:
· The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the
month of March 2004 and year-to-date:
Month: March 2004 YEAR TO DATE
If of If of
Volunteers # of Hours $ Value Volunteers # of Hours i Value
~.dministration 5 15 210 15 45 630
Sports 59 343 4,802 598 5,362 75,068
Sr &Human 64 441 6,174 185 1,357 18,998
Services
Special 38 261 3,654 52 289 4,046
Events
Youth Programs 85 246 3,444 210 553 7,742
Teens:
· The table below and on the next page summarizes teen pro,qram participation for the month
of April 2004:
I Program Attendance/Participation - April 2004
Teen Center 1,106
Homework Room 31
TRAC - Babysitting 68 participants
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Program Attendance/Participation - April 2004
TRAC - Monthly Activities 25 participants
TRAC - Snack Bars 6 volunteers/3.5 volunteer hours
Spruce Skate Facility 720
Teen Connection 70 volunteers/55.5 hours of service
Teen Workshop - Girls Self Defense 19
· Upcominq events for teens include: Annual TRAC volunteer recognition and awards
ceremony at the May 20th Park and Recreation Commission meeting; Summer Swim Party
at Alta Loma High School pool on June 26th; Teen Girls Self Defense Workshop on June
26th.
Youth Activities:
· Playschool registration for our spring session is currently at 659 students in 42 classes. All
classes are filling up quickly with waiting lists developing for many of our classes.
· The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a fun neighborhood event.
The Fun on the Run Unit program is going very well this winter. This past month, 685
children were served through the program at 5 park sites. The program continues from
March 1st through June 11th, Monday through Friday from 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm. The table
bellows outlines the parks being visited during the reporting period:
,r oca,,on
Monday Bear Gulch Park
Tuesday Hermosa Park _
Wednesday Old Town Park ....
Thursday Day Creek Park
Friday Windrows Park
Youth Enrichment Services Grant Program: ~ sFAN~ ~/I'E R ~S,~RT~, ~o
· The table below illustrates attendance/participation figures for programs/services provided
through the YES Grant for the month of April 2004.
Program Attendance/Participation
FACTS Center Visits 1,653
Parent Education Classes 12 classes; 45 participants
Car Seat Checks 35
Child Care 43
· Grant funding for the YES program will terminate at the end of June 2004. With a change in
funding priorities by the First 5 San Bernardino, the City will not be pursuing funding for
following fiscal year. As allowed by the Commission, materials purchased through the grant
will remain available to residents at our local library.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Youth Sports:
· The Sports Advisorv Committee met on May 12~. At this meeting the fall/winter field
allocation for fall/winter (August 1, 2004 through January 31, 2005) was reviewed. The next
meeting on the Committee will be on August 11,2004.
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Soccer 350 3-5/boys & girls 35
Track & Field Program 50 6-15/boys & girls N/A
Youth Volleyball 120 8-14/boys & girls 14
Cucamonga Middle School 220 8-14/boys & girls 14
(CMS) JudoNolleyball
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity # Participants
Adult Basketball 554
Youth Basketball 1,331
Adult Racquetball 440
Youth Racquetball 56
Adult Volleyball 17
Youth Volleyball 33
Jazzercise 1,326
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Racquetball 15 Adult/Males N/A
Basketball (full court) 180 AdultJMales 18
Adult Sports:
· Four (4) adult softball tournaments are scheduled at the Epicenter and Adult Sports
Complex during the month of May 2004.
· Thirty-six (36) adults are participating in our tennis leaques.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,400 150 Males/Females
Soccer 672 42 Males/Females
Flag Football 100 10 Males
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport leagues. For the reporting period,
10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 59,907 participants and spectators
enjoying our parks during both practices and game times.
Special Events:
· Staff is currently programming our upcoming summer events for 2004 including: the 4th of
July celebration that will take place this year at the Epicenter due to construction at Chaffey
College and the Concerts in the Park and the Movies in the Park series at Red Hill
Community Park.
Performing and Cultural Arts:
· The all American musical, "The Music Man" will be presented July 9, 10, 11, 16, 17 and 18th
at Los Osos High School. Auditions for the show were held April 28th and May 1st with 139
community members between the ages of 8 and 56 auditioning. Over 90 community
members were cast in show, directed by Barbara Hinrichsen.
· The RC Performance Troupe, directed by Keely Milliken and Alison Hooper, will conclude
their 9-month program with a Spotlight Showcase at Chaffey College Theatre on Saturday,
June 12th at 7:30 p.m. The 21 troupe members will perform all of the numbers they have
learned over the past three sessions along with a selection of solos and duets. The
performance is open to the public and tickets are $8 each.
· For the second year the Cultural Arts division is joining efforts with artists at Chaffey College
to present Creative Camp 4 Creative Kids, a summer day camp program offering both visual
and performing arts instruction and activities. The week-long program will be offered four
times over the months of June and July, each focusing on a different theme, and will be held
at the Wignall Museum/Gallery at Chaffey College. The camp program will meet Monday
through Friday, from 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. The morning hours will be dedicated to instruction in
the visual arts, and the afternoon portion will focus on performing arts. Cost is $150 per
week and includes all materials. Each week-long program will conclude with a performance
and art exhibit for family and friends produced by the students in the camp.
Park and Facilities:
· The table below and on the following page provides usage information for park picnic
shelters and special use facilities for the month of April 2004.
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications of
Processed Rentals
Red Hill Community Park Picnic 1,730 32 41 152
Shelters
Heritage Community 1,069 20 23 74
Park Picnic Shelters
Hermosa Park Picnic Shelter 439 16 17 67
Milliken Park Picnic Shelter 563 20 22 87
Coyote Canyon Picnic Shelter 245 7 12 35
Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications of
Processed Rentals
Amphitheater 100 2 2 13
Equestrian 270 3 3 13.5
· Not available due to Civic Center construction project.
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
· Equestrian Center usaqe for the month of May 2004 is shown in the table below.
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Rising Stars of May 2na ICC Dressage Show/7-4:00 p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
Alta Loma Riding Club May 6~h Board Meeting/7-8:30 p.m.
TBA May 8th Dressage Clinic/TBA
Equestrian Patrol May 13t" Meeting/6-9:00 p.m.
TBA May 16t" National Horsemanship Clinic with Roger
Dunning/9-5:00 p.m.
4-H Club May 17t~ Meeting/7-9:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club May 18~" Membership Meeting/7-8:30 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club May 22no Horse Show/9-3:00 p.m.
TBA - To be announced.
Facilities:
· The table below displays buildinq rentals and recreation contract class attendance numbers
for the month of April 2004.
Activity Program Numbers April
Attendance
Lions East Rentals 114 bookings 980
Lions East Building 535 facility hours 8,282
Lions West Rentals 200 bookings 3,369
Lions West Building 400 facility hours 6,463
Spring Session Recreation 300 classes 20,707
Contract Classes
· Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address
maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and
supportive of the City's efforts.
· Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in
need of assistance.
Departmental/City Marketing:
· Marketing efforts continue being implemented fro the promotion of the Victoria Gardens
Cultural Center and the Promotin.q Arts and Literacy (PAL) fundraising campaign.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
· "Buildinq the Dream - Central Park I1" show to air on RCTV 3 currently in production to
continue sharing construction progress to the community about the construction of Phase 1
of Central Park.
Epicenter Marketing:
· A postcard mailer is being developed to promote the designation of "Finest Class 'A"
Stadium in the Country" by Baseball America for mailing to film industry location scouts.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission is scheduled for May 20, 2004.
At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon by the
Commission:
Update on Senior Advisory Committee.
Update on Sports Advisory Committee.
Update on Central Park Project.
Update on Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project.
Update on marketing activities for the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter.
Review of proposed changes to the fee resolution.
Consideration of fall/winter 2004/2005 field allocations for youth sports groups.
Annual review of proof of residency requirements policy and its impact on City
programs.
Presentation of Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) end of the year recognition
awards.
> Status on Girl Scout Bridge Project at Central Park.
> Information regarding the City's field use policy.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The Rancho Cucamon.qa Community Foundation did not meet in May due to a lack of
quorum.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period:
> Mt. Baldy Boy Scouts of America - Scout-O-Rama - April 30 - May 2"~, 2004 -
Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex - Soccer Fields.
· Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the
Epicenter:
Maintenance Superintendents Association - Mini Equipment Show- May 27, 2004 -
Epicenter Parking Lots A & B.
RC Police Department - Bike Rodeo- June 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area.
Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - Ali-Star Game - June 8, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium.
Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation - June 10, 2004 - Epicenter
Stadium.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
May 19, 2004
Joe O'Neil
irector City Engineer
I:tCOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncil~StaffReportsl2.004tupdateS. 19.04. doc