HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-575 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 87-57 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN CliO
~3CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT C~ANGE
NO. 87-03, R~UESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
FROM OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR
3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT
AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202-151-33
A. Recitals.
(i) Weirick Properties has filed an application for the Development
District Change No. 87-03 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Change request
is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On Septenber 23, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application,
and issued Resolution No. 87-170 recommending to the City Council that said
application be denied.
(iii) On October 21, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucsmonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution..
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and
correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on October 21, 1987, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the southwest
corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue with a street
frontage of 523 feet and lot depth of 298 feet and is presently
vacant; and
Resolution No. 87-575
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the
property to the south of that site consists of a neighborhood
commercial center, the property to the east is apartments and
neighborhood commercial center, and the property to the west is
senior housing.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific
findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Council
hereby finds and concludes that the proposed amendment change is not
in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies of the General
Plan as follows:
(a) The Base Line/Archibald intersection is already saturated
with existing commerclal centers at all four corners. To expand
the commercial designation, as proposed with this application,
beyond its existing llmits would not be in the best interests of
the Community.
(b) There is a need in this locality for the provision of office
and support services to service the needs of adjacent residents.
The existing designation would meximize the site'e potential to
provide for these office/professional service uses.
(c) The existing Office deeignatlon affords ample opportunity
for the provision of retail commercial uses to balance the
primary office intent of the site.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1,
2 and 3 above, this Councll hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
6580 to 6585 of the Callfornia Government Code, that the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies on the 21st day
of October, 1987, Developant District Amendment No. 87-03.
NOT APPROVED