HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-354 - Resolutions REMOVED FROM AGENDA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-354
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TIME
EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW NO. 88-03, AND DENYING THE
APPEAL THEREOF, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 20 APARTMENT UNITS ON
1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE
END OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE, WEST OF EDWIN STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) Alan Smith, on behalf of the A.E. Smith Company, has filed an
application for approval of a Time Extension for Design Review No. 88-03 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Time Extension of Design Review 88-03 is referred to as "the Time
Extensi on."
(ii) On August 8, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the Time Extension, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted
their Resolution No. 90-106 thereby approving the Time Extension.
(iii) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval
represented in said Resolution No. 90-106 on the basis on a condition
contained in said Resolution. The condition appealed is described as follows:
(a) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the
establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District pertaining to the project site to provide,
in conjunction with the applicable School District,
for the construction and maintenance of necessary
school facilities. However, if any School District
has previously established such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the
alternative, consent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing
District prior to the issuance of building permits.
Further, if the affected School District has not
formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District
within 12 months of the date of approval of the time
extension and prior to the recordation of the Final
Map or issuance of building permits for said
project, this condition shall be deemed null and
void.
(iv) On the 5th of September, 1990, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal of the
Time Extension and, on said date, concluded the public hearing.
Resolution No. 90-354
Page 2
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been
reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated negative
Declaration issued on August 8, 1990.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above referenced September 5, 1990 hearing, including written staff
reports, the minutes of the above-referenced August 8, 1990 Planning
Commission meeting and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No.
90-106, this Council specifically finds as follows:
(a) The Time Extension applies to property located at
the terminuses of Main Street and Sierra Madre
Avenue (APN 207-251-22) within the Medium-High
Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per
acre);
(b) The property to the north, west, and south of the
subject site is within the Medium-High Residential
Development District and is currently developed with
single family homes and apartment units to the north
and west, respectively, with the A.T. & S.F.
railroad and vacant land to the south;
(c) The Time Extension is for the development of a 20-
unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres of land;
(d) The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution
No. 90-106, specifically Condition No. 3.(c) - (The
School Mitigation Condition) is necessary for com-
pliance with Urgency Ordinance No. 395, pertaining
to the evaluation of adequate school facilities for
proposed residential development;
(e) The Chaffey Joint Union High School District inform-
ed the City that there is insufficent capacity to
handle this project and that a Mello-Roos District
is being formed.
Resolution No~ 90-354
Page 3
(f) The Time Extension, with the addition of the
standard school condition, as specified, is
consistent with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan and Development Code of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and is not likely to cause public
heal th and safety problems.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) The Time Extension is consistent wi th the General
Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga;
(b) The design or improvements of the Time Extension are
consistent with the General Plan and Development
Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(c) The subject site is physically suitable for the type
of development proposed;
(d) The design of the proposed development is not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or avoid-
able injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The development is not likely to cause serious
heal th problems; and
(f) The design of the development will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed development.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the applicant's appeal and
approves the Time Extension subject to all of the Conditions set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-106.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Alan Smith of A.E. Smith
Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented
by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed
to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith
transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-
receipt requested, to Alan Smith at the address identified in City records.