HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-365 - Resolutions RESOLUTI(INNO. 91-365
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(]tO
~, CALIFORNIA, D~qYING G~tERAL PLAN ~
91-03, SUBAREA K, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE G~AL PLAN
LAND USE MAP FRC~ M~Di-b~ RESIDentIAL (8-14 Eg~LI.TNG UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW~IL~ RESID~qTIAL (4-8 D~m~.LrNG UNITS
PER ACRE) FOR 7.895 ACRES OF IAND I/)C2tT~) BEIWRFN
APPRDXIMATELY 892 FEET AND 1,200 FE~T NO~PH OF THE FUTURE
VICIORIA PARK LANE ~SION ON ~HE WEST SIDE OF THE
SUPPOR~ THEREOF - APN: PO~i~ON OF 227-021-03 AND 13
A. Recitals.
(i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the
enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40.
(ii) On August 5, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an
application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea K, as described in
the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
General Plan ~t is referred to as "the application."
(iii) On October 9, 1991, the Planning C~m~,~ssion of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and follc~ing the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution
No. 91-171 recommending to the City Council that the application be approved.
(iv) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing
prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
(v) Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:
1. ~his Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to 7.895 acres of land located
between approximately 892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria
Park Lane extension on the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard and is
presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and
Resolution No. 91-365
Page 2
(b) ~ne property to the north of the subject site is designated
Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant; the
property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) and is vacant; the property to the east is designated Flood Control/
Utility Corridor and is vacant; and the property to the west is designated
Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is vacant; and
(c) ~nis amendment conflicts with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
(d) This amendment does not prc~ote the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Element; and
(e) ~ne properties located in Subarea K of the application are
not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are not
compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations; and
(f) ~nis amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and
conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study; and
3. This Council hereby fir~ that the project has been reviewed and
considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
and, further, this Council hereby issues a Neqative Declaration.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment
91-03, Subarea K, a request to amend the General Plan T~nd Use Map frc~ Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium R~sidential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) for 7.895 acres of land located between approximately
892 feet and 1,200 feet north of the future Victoria Park Lane extension on
the west side of the future Day Creek Boulevard as shown in Exhibit "A."
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this R~solution.
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPI~D this 20th day of November, 1991.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright
NOES: None
~)e~nis L. Stout, Mayor
Resolution No. 91-365
Page 3
E~ra J. A~, City Clerk
I, Df~RA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said city Council held on the 20th day of
NoveK~oer, 1991.
Executed this 21st day of N~, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
D~}rra J. ~am~, ',-z, clerk
Resolution No. 91-365
Page 4
HIGHLAND AVENUE
EXHIBIT 'A'