Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-213 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-213 A RESOI/3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCID COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING G~ERAL PLAN ~ 91-02B, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, TO AM~D THE G~qERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FRC~ M~Di-t~ RESID~CIAL (8-14 [Y~Fr.LING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW M~Di-t~ RESIDenTIAL (4-8 DWFLI.ING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR ~XIMATELY 10 AC~ES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAI~AY, ON THE FAST BY FAST AV~qUE, ON THE SOUTH BY EXIglq]%~ OFFICE DESI~ LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW M~DIL~ RESID~fAL DESI~ LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66; AND D~YING THE FAST PORITON OF SUBAREA 8, TO AM~qD THE G~NERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE WEST PORTION FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOITUHERN PACIFIC ~Y, ON THE FAST AND SOUTH BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FRE~NAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EAST AVENUE - APN: 227-131-05, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THSRSDF A. P~citals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B as described in the title of this Resolu- tion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning C~L~,,~ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and reoc~m~_nded approval for the west portion and denial for the east portion by adoption of Resolution No. 91-65A. (iii) On November 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on application. (iv) Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ~solu- tion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Rmsolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidenoe presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 20, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Resolution No. 91-213 Page 2 (a) Subarea 8 of the application applies to approximately 20.34 acres of land bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific Railway, on the east by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the south by existing office designated land and the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land and divided in a north-south direction by East Avenue as ~ on Exhibit "A", and is presently underdeveloped with two single family residences. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling unite per acre); and (b) ~ne property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Office and is vacant. (c) ~%is amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, but land use incompatibilities may result on the east portion of Subarea 8 because the east area is adjacent to significant transportation facilities; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detri- mental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties, but land use inccm~atibilities my result for the east portion of Subarea 8. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the properties located in the west portion of Subarea 8 of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are compatible with existing and surrounding land use designa- tions as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and west by the same land use designatic~ and that the properties in the east portion are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district because the triangular site is bordered on three sides by significant transportation facilities; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the ~urrour~ing properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Environ- mental Study and that the proposed designation for the west portion of Subarea 8 would reduce the intensity of future residential development on the subject Resolution No. 91-213 Page3 (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by promoting the retention of Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in o~liance with the California Environmental Quality ~t of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby authorizes the issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that on the 20th day of November, 1991, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga approves General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, west portion of Subarea 8, amending the General Plan Land Use Map fr~m Med~ium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approxi- mately 10.00 acres of land and denies the land use change for the east portion of Subarea 8, as shown on Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPI~D this 20th day of Novemlber, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: Wright ABS~T: None Dennis L StOut, Mayor De~ra J. ~am~/City Clerk' I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY cLFRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of Nove~r~er, 1991. Resolution No. 91-213 Page 4 Executed this 21st day of November, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. D~hra J. Ad~, City ~l'erk~ Resolution No. 91-213 Page 5 VL : . .. . ' ' : i ,. General Plan Amendments I LM ~ LM i LM - Land Uae !I ~ / ~ PROla[RTI[$ CUIII~[NTL~ ......... .'. OES~,~T[O KO,U, ~ '~ R[5IOENTIAL (1-1~ ~ CON,lO[RATION FOR ~[O[~iGNAT'C~ Off- (~-I OI[LLING UNIT~ :LM ~ 1 . Subarea Nos. park Co~m. ~ Subarea 2 amended percale L M [~M- GPA 91-02B OF ~CHO C~C~ONGA