The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About91-211 - Resolutions RESOI/3TION NO. 91-211 A RESOI/IrION OF ~6E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~, CATIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWAA SPECIFIC PLAN AMfh~MENT 91-03, SUBAREA 4, A REQUEST TO AMflgD THE EITWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDI-t~ RESIDf]gTIAL (8-14 DW~[~.ING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDi-t~ RESIDf]gT/AL (4-8 DWR~I.ING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 11.09 ACRES OF IAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, ON THE SOUTHEAST BY~O~O (I-15) ~Y, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MfDIUM RESIDf]gT/3%L DESIGNATED LAND, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPO~ THflREOF - APN: 1100-051-01 AND 02 AND 1100-061-01 A. Recitals. (i) On July 6, 1983, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the ena=~nt of the Regulatory Provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan through the adoption of Ordinance No. 203. (ii) On March 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Ame_ndment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (iii) On May 22, and continued to May 29, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam~nga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No. 91-62 recommending to the City Council that said application be denied. (iv) On July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Resolution. (v) Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this council hereby specifically finds as follows: Resolution No. 91-211 Page 2 (a) This amendment may conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and my not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (b) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the land Use Element; and (c) That the properties located in Subarea 4 of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are incompatible with existing and surrounding land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the southwest by a freeway on-ramp and on the north by a major arterial road and freeway off-ramp intersection; and (d) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrour~ ~x~ properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions listed in Parts and II of the Initial Study, but that land use incompatibilities may result; and (e) That the proposed amendment my not be in conformance with the General Plan due to the potential of establishing incompatible land use relationships with single family uses and significant vehicle traffic activities. 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council does not issue a Negative Declaration because the land use change may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, Subarea 4, a request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 11.09 acres of land bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land as shown in tDdlibit "Al". 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of th_is Resolution. PASS,I), APPROVED, and ADO~ this 17th day of July, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABS~2~T: Wright Resolution No. 91-211 Page 3 Stout, Mayor 'D~a J. ~ City Clerk-- I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLR~K of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved,-and adopted by the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of July, 1991. Executed this 18th day of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. / / ~_bra J.-A~, ' ' Resolution No. 91-211 Page 4 ¥1¢TORI~ STrEeT , Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendments g1-03 i Foothill 131vd. Specific Plan Amendments 91-02 LM LM - District Designation ~ PROPERTIES CURRENTLY OESI~NATED NEOIUW RESIDENTIAL (I-14 OIELLIN$ UNITS PER ACRE} UNOER CONSIDERATION FOR RI:DESIgNATION TO LOI NEDIU¥ RESIDENTIAL 14-10IELLIN$ UNIT} PER ACRE) OP LM ~.~ / ' ESPA Subarea Nos. " - FSPA Subarea Hoc. LM ~ R FI~M:ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02 CITY OF RANCH° CUCAMONGA PLANNINGDIVISION TTTLE:Sp.cific Plan Amend. Location Mep EXHIBrT: 'Al' SCALF<