Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-210 - Resolutions RESOLUI~ON NO. 91-210 A RESOI/3TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMflNGA, CAr~FORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN ~ 91-02B, SUBAREA 6, A PdDQUFS~ TO AMEND THE GENERAL PlAN LAND USEMAP FROM~~ID~/AL (8-14 DW~I.~G~ PER ACRE) TO LOW M~DIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DW~I.TNG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 11.09 ACRES OF 1AND BORDERED ON THE NORI~ BY BASE LINE ROAD, ON THE SOUTHEAST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREtSqAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW M~Di-dM RESIDt~lW~AL DESIGNATED LAND, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORP THERSDF - APN: 1100-051-01 AND 02 AND 1100-061-01 A. Recitals. (i) On April 6, 1981, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the General Plan through the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (ii) On March 15, 1991, the City of Rancho Cucal~onga filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (iii) On May 22, and continued to May 29, 1991, the Planning CoJ~ut~ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and following the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No. 91-61 recommending to the City Council t_hat said application be denied. (iv) On July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearingprior to its adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongadoes hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Resolution No. 91-210 Page 2 (a) Subarea 6 of the application applies to approximately 11.09 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land as shown on Exhibit "A," and is presently vacant Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (b) The properties to the north of the subject site on the opposite side of Base Line Road are designated Medium Residential and are developed with a c~tut~rcial plant nursery. The property to the southeast is designated freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the west is designated Low Medium Residential and is underdeveloped with a single family residence; and (c) This am~t may conflict with ~he Land Use Policies of the General Plan and may not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment may not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) That the properties located in Subarea 6 of the application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are ~tible with existing and surrounding land use designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the southwest by a freeway on-ramp and on the north by a major arterial road and freeway off-ramp intersection; and (f) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findir~s and concl%.~-ions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study but that land use inco~3at ~ities may result; and (g) Tha% ne proposed amendment may not be in conformance with the General Plan due tc the potential of establishing ~tible land use relationships with single family uses and significant vehicle traffic activities. 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in c~mpliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council does not issue a Negative Declaration because the land use c~e may not promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 6 a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map fr~ Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 11.09 acres of land bordered on the north by Base T.~ne Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land as shown in Exhibit "A". Resolution No. 91-210 Page 3 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 1991. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None ABS~T: Wright I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CI.ERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of July, 1991. Executed this 18th day of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~bra J~n~, City Clerk Resolution No. 91-210 Page 4 Etiwlndm Area General Plan Amendments 9 LM - Lind Use Designation ~ [] PROPERTI[$ CURR[#TL¥ ......... .' D[S~NAT[D W[DIUB RESIDENTIAL (~-14 DIELLING UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER ~ CONSIDERATION FOR REDESIGNATION TO LOW ~DIUW RESIDENTIAL Off. (4-8 DIELLIK UNITS PER ACRE) LM . I . Subarea Nos. el4 park Comm. ~'-- Subirll 2 if. ended pit©ill L M ~ [TEM: GPA 91-02B CiTY OF' R.A~CHO CUCAMONGA · · - TITLE:General PIIn Amend. Location Map ,~i' _- PLANNING DMSION = EXHIBIT~ 'A' SCALE: ~. · ~ -