HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-202 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-202
A RESOI/3I~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CTI/AMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PlAN ~ 91-02, SUBAREA 2, AMENDING THE
FOOTHILL ~ SPECIFIC PlAN 1AND USE MAP FROM M~DIUM
RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWFrLYNG UNITS PER ACRE) TO A COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PlAN R~Q~ FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4.25 ACRES OF LAND 430 FEET NORTH AND 200
FEET EAST OF THE NOR/~IFAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BO~
AND ~A AVSI~UE (APN: 1100-161-01 AND 03), AND TO A
(I~4ERCIAL OFFICE DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN
~ FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES BORDERSD ON THE
NORPH AND WEST BY EXISTING MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED
LAND, ON THE EAST BY A UTTLITY CORRIDOR, AND ONTHE SOUTH
BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, (WESTERN PORTION OF APN:
1100-201-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERSDF -
APN: ll00-161-01AND 03 AND APORTION OF 1100-201-01
A. Recitals.
(i) On September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
through adoption of Resolution No. 87-505.
(ii) The City of Rancho Cucam~nga filed an application for Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-02 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
(iii) On May 22, 1991, the Planning Co~mission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 91-55
recommending to the City Council that said application be approved and a
Negative Declaration be certified.
(iv) On May 22, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on property owner initiated
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment applications 90-03 and 91-03 for
properties which are a part of this application and issued Resolution Nos.
91-51 and 91-53 reco~t=~nding to the City Council that Foothill Boulevard
Specific Planets 90-03 and 91-03 be approved.
(v) On July 17, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior
to its adoption of this Resolution.
(vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
Resolution No. 91-202
Page 2
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on July 17, 1991, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The remaining portions of Subarea 2 apply to approximately
4.25 acres, 430 feet north and 200 feet east of the intersection of Etiwanda
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, bordered on the north and east by existing
Medium Residential designated land, and is presently underdeveloped with a
single family residence in the northern portion; and approximately 1.5 acres
bordered on the north and west by existing Medium Residential designated land,
on the east by a utility corridor, and on the south by Foothill Boulevard.
Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre); and
(b) The properties to the north of the subject sites are
designated Medium Residential and are vacant; the properties to the east are
designated Medium Residential and Utility Corridor, and are vacant; the
properties south of Foothill Boulevard are designated C~t..Lercial and Low
Residential with the commercial portion vacant and the residential portion
developed with a single family residential tract; and the property on the west
side of Etiwanda Avenue is designated Co~rcial and is developed with a
vacant c~rcial structure; and
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and will provide for
development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
(d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
(e) That the properties located in Subarea 2 of the application
are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district and are
compatible with existing and proposed co;m~-~rcial land use designations along
this portion of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of the City; and
(f) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the find/rigs and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial Study of
this application and of General Plan Amendments 90-02B and 91-0lA; and
(g) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and
considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970
and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
Resolution No. 91-202
Page 3
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves those portions listed in the
title of this Resolution of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-
02, Subarea 2, amending the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to a Cu~,,~nity C~,,~rcial
designation with a Master Plan requirement for approximately 4.25 acres of
land, 430 feet north and 200 feet east of the northeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue (APN: 1100-161-01 and 03), and to a C~,,~rcial
Office designation with a Master Plan requirement for approximately 1.5 acres
bordered on the north and west by existing Medium Residential designated land,
on the east by a utility corridor, and on the south by Foothill Boulevard
(western portion of APN: 1100-201-01), as shown on Exhibit "Al."
5. The city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this R~solution.
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 1991.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams
NOES: None
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Debra J. Ad~s, City ~i~F
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho CMcamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of
July, 1991.
Executed this 18th day of July, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
~bra J.~A~ms, City cler~-
Resolution No. 91-202
Page 4
¥1¢TOIIIA
VL , .........
Amlndmentl 91-02
PROPERTIES CURRENTLY
?0 LOI MEDIUU R[SlD[NTIAL
~ x~ ~' ~T d (4-8 DIELLING UNIT~ PER ACRE)
~ .%% ~~ ~ m I ' ESPA Submreo Nos,
Rfg. ReI.C, r
[~.ESPA 91-03, FSP~ 91-02