HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-121 - Resolutions RESOI//fIC~ NO. 91-121
A RESOLUTION OF ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(~O
~, CALIFORNIA, OF PRR~.r~INARY APPROVAL OF CITY
~G~'S ANN-dAL REPORT FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION
IMP~DV~4~T DISTRICT (PD-85)
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting A~t of 1972, the City
Engi~_r is required to make and file with tb~ City Clerk of the City an
annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected
to pay the costs of tb~ maintenance and/or improv~ent of said Park and
Recreation Improvement District (PD-85).
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of
said City a report, attached hereto, in writing as called for under and
pursuant to said Act, which h~.~ been presented to this Council for
consideration; and
WHEREAS, said Council ba-~ duly considered said report and each and
every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said re~ort is
sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be
modified in any respect.
NCW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby order as follows:
1. That the Engineer's estimate of itemized costs and exper~es of
said work and of the incidental expenses in connection there-
with, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby
preliminarily approved and confirme~__.
2. ~nat the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to
and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions
of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby prelimi-
narily approved and confirmed.
3. ~nat the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in
said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit
to be received by said subdivision, respectively, frc~ said work
ar~ of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said
report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engi~_r's Annual
Report for the fiscal year 1991/92 for the purposes of all
PASS~D, APPrOVeD, and ADOPI~D this 1st day of May, 1991.
Resolution No. 91-121
Page 2
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright
NOES: None
De~a J. Adm~ City Clerk'
I, DEMRA J. ADAMS, CITY f~.RRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamc~Fa,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of
May, 1991.
Executed this 2nd day of May, 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
' E~hra J. ~,' City Clerk
Resolution No. 91-121
Page 3
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Report
85-PD
Fiscal Year 1991/92
AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report for the 1991/92 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter
1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and
Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual
levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. 85-PD, thereafter
referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to
provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of
Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
FINDINGS
Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting ACt of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according
to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states:
'The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment
district may be apportioned by any formula or method which
fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or
parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is
contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the
Streets and Highways Code, State of California).
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district
into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the
improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving
substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous
or noncontiguous areas.
As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax;
and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as
a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the
particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad
mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, common areas, and non-
profit organizations (Le., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment.
The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage.
DISTRICT ANALYSIS
A. Improvement District Boundary
The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the
Resolution No. 91-121
Page 4
general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista
Planned Communities.
All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared
in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in
the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third
Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by
reference.
B. District Name
City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Improvement District No. 85-PD.
C. Facilities
The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows:
1. The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to,
grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting,
restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities,
athletic facilities, and walking, Jogging and equestrian trails.
2. The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to,
grading, planting, irrigation, onslte roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting,
waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic
facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, Jogging trail, underground storm
drain system, and adjacent public street improvements.
ESTIMATE OF WORK
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering
deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any
surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the
following fiscal year.
1991/92 Fiscal Year Estimated Costs & Budget Summary
Balance from 1990/91 Budget $ 25,000
Contributions (interest earned)
Redemption Fund/Limited
to Pay Bond Debt Service $ 30,(IX)
Special Reserve Fund/IAmlted
to Pay Bond Debt Serv/ee $ 15,(XX)
Total Estimated Available Funds $ 70000
County Special Charges $ 6157
Administration Charges $ 123,140
Consultant's Fees $ 0
Debt Service Installment (1/2/92) $ 240.000
Debt Service Installment {7/2/91) $ 580,000
Operation & Maintenance . ~
$1,149,297
Balance to Assessment $1,079,297
Resolution No. 91-121
Page 5
METHOD OF SPREAD
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by
any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the
District in proportion to the estimated benefits received.
A. Definitions
The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the
assessments as follows;
CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units
within certain ranges of parcel size.
CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined tn Category A or Category C.
CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching
the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the
Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search,
several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and
type codes of. for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back
into the rolls and assessed.
B. Formula
The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the
current San Bernardino Assessor's computer fries and Assessor's parcel maps.
Category A:
All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following
conditions.
N,rmber of Existing Res.
Parcel Size Range Dwelling Units/Parcel
Less than 1.5 acres and 1 or more dwelling units
1.51 to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units
3.51 to 7.0 acres and 4 or more dwelling units
7.01 to 14.0 acres and 8 or more dwelling units
14.01 to 25.0 acres and 15 or more dwelling units
25.01 acres & larger and 26 or more dwelling units
Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for
Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more
residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are
expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in
assessments due to new development.
Category B:
All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C.
Resolution No. 91-121
Page6
Category C:
All exempt parcels as defined below:
1. All properties currently tax exempt:
2. All public ownerships;
3. l~tlroad mainline rights-of-way;
4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way;
5. Mineral rights;
6. Pamels so small they currently cannot be built upon;
7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500
and 1.5 acres or less: and
8.Non-profit ori/anizations (i.e., churches).
C. Summary of PrelL- ....~ Assessment Amounts
Category A:
The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year
1991/92 is tk35.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category ,~ Category A parcels
containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount
equal to $35.00 times the number of dwelling units.
Category B:
The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year
1990/91 shall be according to the following schedule:
Definition Assessment Per Parcel
1.51 acres to 3. 50 acres $ 52.49
3.51 acres to 7.0 acres $122.48
7.01 acres to 14.0 acres $244.97
14.01 acres to 25.0 acres /~189.93
25.01 acres & larger $874.88
Category C:
The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels.
PROJECTED 1990/91 ASSESSMENTS
Single Family Units 27,279 at $ 35.00 = $ 854,751.44
Less than 1.50 acres 8/]9 at $ 17.50 = $ 15,730.50
1.5 acres to 3.50 acres 374at $ 52.49 = $ 19,631.26
3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 219 at $122.48 = $ 262]~.12
7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 146 at $249.97 = $ 35,763.62
14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 51 at gkt89.93 = $ 24~86.43
25.01 acres or larger 27 at 1i~874.88 =
$1,101,309.63
Resolution No. 91-121
Page 7
L986/87 1987/88 ~ 1989/{~0 1990/91 ~
Per Residential $.33.50 $33.50 $33.50 $33.50 $35.00 $35.00
Vacant Land
1.5 acres or less $16.75 $16.75 $16.75 $16.75 $17.50 $17.50
Vacant Land
1.51 to 3.5 acres $50.25 $50.25 $50.25 $.50.25 $52.49 $52.49
Vacant Land
3.51 to 7.0acres $117.25 $117.25 $117.25 $117.25 $122.48 $122.48
Vacant Land
7.01 to 14.0 acres $234.50 $234.50 $234.50 $234.50 $249.97 $249.97
Vacant Land 14.01
to 25.0 acres $469.00 $469.00 $469.00 $469.00 $489.93 $489.93
Vacant Land
25.01 acres or
larger $837.50 /~37.50 $837.50 $837.50 $874.88 $874.88