Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998/12/16 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. December 16,1998 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander , Biane Curatalo , Dutton and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition commending Jimmy Schafer and Amanda Bratvoid of Alta Loma High School for being selected to play in the Pasadena City Rose Bowl Band. Presentation of a Proclamation commending the Pop Warner Panthers Midget Division and Braves Junior Midget Division on their Mount Baldy Conference Championship and the Pop Warner Eagles on its American Football Conference (A.F.C.) Division Championship. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/25/98 and 12/2/98 and Payroll ending 11/18/98 for the total amount of $2,591,312.36. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 1998. 10 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 2 o Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO98-069) between the San Bernardino Associated Governments/San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the funding of the construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the construction of Day Creek Boulevard (Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project). RESOLUTION NO. 98-217 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS/SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHLAND AVENUE/DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Base Line Road to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9710 and Account No. 22-4637-9710. RESOLUTION NO. 98-218 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment. Approval to appropriate $27,000 from the Data Processing Replacement Reserve to fund the Library's LAN Network project. 15 19 20 22 27 43 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 3 Approval of Parcel Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 15170, located on the east side of Hellman, north of Wilson, submitted by Hillside Cove Associates, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 98-219 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 15170, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 98-220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEHC ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 15766, located on Base Line Road, approximately 800' west of Victoria Park Lane, submitted by R. C. Apartments L.L.C., a Developer. RESOLUTION NO. 98-221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENTSECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766 RESOLUTION NO. 98-222 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766 44 46 47 52 53 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 4 10. 11. 12. 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the Installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain System relating to Tract 14534-2, located in Victoria Park Lane, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 98-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2 Approval to reject all bids for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Canopy Addition Project because the bids substantially exceed the Engineer's Estimate. Approval to award and authorization for execution of Contract (CO98-070) for the construction of landscaping and irrigation for the Haven Avenue Beautification Project between Base Line Road and Church Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9709. Approval to accept the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, Contract No.98-008, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $157,761.95. RESOLUTION NO. 98-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-008 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the traffic signal lighting at the intersection of Arrow Route and Red Oak Avenue, Contract No. 98-022, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $119,373.00. 56 58 60 61 63 64 65 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 5 14. 15. 16. RESOLUTION NO. 98-225 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-022 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Tapia Via Street Improvements, from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $195,194.41. RESOLUTION NO. 98-226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TAPIA VIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Spruce Park Skate Park, Contract No. 98- 032, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $120,079.80 RESOLUTION NO. 98-227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SPRUCE AVENUE SKATE PARK, CONTRACT NO. 98-032, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approve of the improvements, Release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for improvements for PM 15074, located on the north side of La Vine Street 230 feet east of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Mr. Denning M. Perdew, Executor for the estate of John L. Perdew. 66 67 68 69 71 72 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 RESOLUTION NO. 98-228 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15074, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 73 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-18 through 21. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 592 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UN ITS PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0227- 091-18 THROUGH 21 74 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 6 acres of land on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and for 2 ½ acres of land approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, and 43. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 593 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOR 2 Y2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43 78 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 82 City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 ORDINANCE NO. 594 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 595 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF SUBDIVISION MAPS ORDINANCE NO. 596 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS AND EXTENSIONS 87 89 93 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following requirements. testimony. items have no legal publication or posting The Chair will open the meeting to receive public No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 9 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS 2. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SIGNAGE TASK FORCE 3. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 2. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library 3. Stadium 4. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility 5. Heritage Park 6. Etiwanda Creek Park 7. Central Park B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Facilities 8. The Grapevine 9. Contract Classes 10. Community-wide Special Events 11. Proposed Boxing Program 12. Senior Transportation Program 13. Trips and Tours 14. Human Services 15, Park and Recreation Commission 16. Epicenter 95 104 132 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. City Council Agenda December 16, 1998 10 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS: PROPERTY CLAIM SETTLEMENT PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT BERYL, BETWEEN 19TM STREET AND HIGHLAND; LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON ETIWANDA AVENUE AND VICTORIA AVENUE, NEGOTIATING PARTY BRAD BULLER, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 10, 1998, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODi 12-02-98 (98/99) RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 5121 DE VOOGHT, SCOTT J. 360.00 6050 JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY 150.00 4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY ~1.36 ** CHECK# OVERLAP 3448 ALL WELDING MAINTENANCE REPAIRS # 133701- 1,185.00- {~4 133702 - 134000 47~3 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING 134001~ 765.00- <44 134002 - 134102 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134103* RECREATION REFUND 134104* 4<4 134105 - 134106 PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES # 134107 4{{ 134108 - 134108 10 A & R TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 134109 1 A A EGUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 134110 81.60 391~ A.& M. EOUIPMENT AND SERVICES REBUILD KIT 134111 133.23 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134112 38.79 7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134113 ~4.21 3785 ACTION ART RECREATION SUPPLIES 134114 982.68 57~2 ADAM, ROBERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134115 5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134116 1,800.00 5509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134117 13~.~7 6024 AIRGAS RECREATION REFUND 134118 192.79 4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SERVICE # 134119 170.00 3448 ALL WELDING MAINTEN~NCE REPAIRS 134120 355.00 3778 ALPERT, MELANIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134121 1,365.00 5650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134122 1o~00.00 5~50 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134123 300.00 4763 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING 1341~4 765.00 20971 ANDREWS, THERE8E RECREATION REFUND # 1341~5 43.00 5321 APOLLO WOOD RECOVERY, INC. SUPPLIES & SERVICE # 13412~ 132.22 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS 134127 41.68 402 AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134128 128.33 4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134129 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134130 36.43 5~9 BBR SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS COoINC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134131 15~.77 5791 BELETTO, NANCY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134132 260.00 ~5~ BENEFIELD, KINGSLEY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134133 43.20 5119 BENSON, MAURY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134134 46~9 BORDNER, MARGIE INSTRUCTOR PMT 134135 943.~0 20974 BROADWAY MY WAY ENTERTAINMENT 12/05/98 134136 300.00 4369 BRODART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 134137 1,&80.34 1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134138 6007 BUDCO RECREATION REFUND # 134139 5591 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134140 175.50 552 BURK-BLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN INSTRUCTOR PMT 134141 3,668.20 5746 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134142 3,198.20 20972 C & G CONSTRUCTION, INC. DEPOSIT REFUND 134143 1o000.00 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134144 ~64. 10 69 CHAFFEY dOINT UNION H.S. DISTRICT RENTAL - AUDITORIUM R.C.H.S. 134145 405.00 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 134146 870.60 74 CITY RENTALS EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 134147 279.21 949 CLARK, KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134148 252.00 5407 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134149 324.00 20970 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH SETTLEMENT CLAIM 134150 34~.95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-02-98 (98/99) RUN DATE: I2/02/98 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. CHECK# OVERLAP &43 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 5373 COST CONTROL ASSOCIATES MAINTENANCE # 5~51 COVOC CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 20~73 CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS DEPOSIT REFUND 534~ CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134156 - 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 23~ D & K CONCRETE CO 2512 D.A.R.E. AMERICA 4488 DA~HDEVIRIAN, KATHY 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC 2478 DAPPER TIRE 1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 5138 DIAMOND FENCE CO. 5875 DINGEY THE CLOWN AND FRIENDS 5788 DUFFY, RICK/USKO 36506 DUNCAN, LAURA 57~7 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES° INC. 5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 22~ EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 5~17 FASTENAL COMPANY 364~2 FELIPE'S TAGUERIA 124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND, INC~ 155 FILARSKY & WATT 724 FLORIO, ~OAN 2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. 1082 FRANKLIN GUEST CO. 5502 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 4632 GLOBAL TELE-DATA CORPORATION 5312 GOODHEART, PAULA ~50 GRAINGER~ W.W 3827 GREEN ROC~ POWER EGUIPMENT 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 4486 GUARDIAN 5~09 HASTY AWARDS 820 HEARD P.H.D. , EDWARD 3334 HEILIG, KELLY 5460 HIDALGO, CARLO ~58 HIGGINS, MARTI 4~28 HOCKEY WEST 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. 4033 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 3~33 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRgMS & EDUCATION 1~I HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. 241~ HOYT, RAYMOND 4188 I.D. BURR 42~4 IBM CORPORATION 5804 INACOM COMMUNICATIONS 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS STREET MAINTENANCE D.A.R.E. MATERIAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND PERSONNEL SERVICES # PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # IRRIGATION SUPPLIES # MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFRESHMENTS FOR MEETING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # MONTHLY SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PARTS & INSTALLATION INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 4<< 134184 - MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # MEDICAL PREMIUM RECREATION SUPPLIES # INSTRUCTOR PMT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CERT SUPPLIES RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1341c~4 - # 134151 12,440.87 134152 268.32 134153 295.00 134154 500.00 134155 1,615.0o 134157 134158 19,846.25 13415~ 134160 2,112.22 134161 347. lO 134162 16.35 134163 30400.07 134164 70.00 134165 8&O. 00 134166 270.00 134167 5~0.00 134168 55.00 134169 42~.57 134170 ~,099.00 134171 165.75 134172 57.09 134173 134174 1,192.4~ 134175 405.00 134176 132.00 134177 1,893.80 134178 13417~ 134180 50.00 134181 744.00 134182 993.24 134183 271.10 134184 134185 1,808.67 134186 627.~0 134187 681.30 134188 134189 1,011.60 134190 3~.50 134191 42.08 134192 70.03 134193 2,100.67 1341~4 134195 2,540,04 134196 588.00 134197 317.87 134198 1,824.70 134199 134200 1,509.&4 134201 134202 538.7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 12-02-98 (98/99) RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 134203 453.00 1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES # 134204 5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 134205 684.90 3885 INLAND LAWNMOWER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 134206 36.16 4718 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134207 86.20 2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134208 108.62 5616 ISA MEMBERSHIP # 134209 230.00 612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134210 546.01 5214 JOHNSON, SANDRA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134211 18.00 4700 JONES, KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134212 316.80 6050 JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY RECREATION REFUND 134213 150.00 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 134214 27,171.48 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134215 593.44 4982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.D.B.G. 134216 234.50 172 KOZLOVICHo DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134217 2,637.00 518 KUHN, MARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134218 40.00 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 134219 11,222.55 339 LAM, JACK LEAGUE MEETING 134220 18.90 521~ LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134221 &3.00 5134 LEWIS & LEWIS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134222 288.81 979 LEWIS HOMES REFUND OF DEVELOPMENT FEES 134223 8.50 588~ LIGHTNING FENCE CO. COMMUNITY TRAILS 134224 41,418.45 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 134225 16.56 349 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 134227 63,623.88 72 MARK CHRIS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134228 248.11 4701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA RECREATION REFUND 134229 619.50 250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE TOWING SERVICE8 134230 45.00 3907 MASTER-SORT, INC. PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 134231 98.13 3871 MATT'S HARDWARE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 134232 5283 MAYER, COBLE & PALMER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 134233 1,187.50 31060 MCG ARCHITECTS REFUND 134234 25.00 2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. #3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134235 17.70 4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 134236 140. 12 5987 MOUNTAIN FRESH DRINKING WATER SYS. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134~37 37.00 31061 NASCIMENTO, IAN MISC 134238 31064 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CENTER SUBSCRIPTION 134239 36.90 31062 NELSON, ARCHIE RECREATION 134240 10.00 5568 NET 10 TECNOLOGIES 2 ON-SITE CLASSES 134241 3,000.00 3600 NIELSEN, NETTIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134242 5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 134243 740.00 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134244 346.2~ 6025 NTIS RECREATION REFUND 134245 47.~0 5~7 OLYMPIC STUDIOS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134246 2,407.50 5393 OMLOR, AMY COMMUNITY SERVICES ENTERTAINMT 134247 54.00 3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134248 458.91 5702 ON WITH LEARNING, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134249 374.63 3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134250 748.80 134251 134252 134253 ~{4 134251 - 5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # ~461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1,894.28 42.47 ! I ! I ! ! I ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-02-9S RUN DATE: 12/02/9S PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. CHECK# OVERLAP 310~3 OTANEZ, CAROLA RECREATION 134254 38.00 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134~5~ 6,477.68 31059 P.C. ELECTRIC, INC. REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT 134256 549.34 1441 PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134257 57.01 4223 PAPER DIRECT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 134258 236.65 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 134259 134.80 44~ PARK SPECIALITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 134260 111,0S0.8~ 540~ PARTSMASTER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1342~1 757 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1342~2 94.52 3~3 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 134~63 5720 PERVO PAINT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134264 45~.77 ~87 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS MONTHLY SERVICE 134265 55~7 PHOTOMAX SUPPLY CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134266 1,055.~8 4554 PITASSI, PETER J. ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT 134267 10,140.54 7~1 PMI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 134268 104~ POMONA VALLEY KAWASA½I VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13426~ 441.72 2719 PONCHAUD, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134270 65.40 5177 PORT SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134271 ~58.70 30~71 POTTER, MELISSA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 134272 37.17 6~3 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO. , INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134273 165.~2 758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 134274 99.83 5316 PRECISION GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134275 223.80 ~026 PRICE RIGHT EMB. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 134276 168.87 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 2,87~.61 4668 PULLTARPS MANUFACTURING 257.91 58~9 GUALTIY ONE ENGRAVERS ~4.82 (~ 134277 - 134277 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134278 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13427~ OFFICE SUPPLIES # 134280 ~ 134~81 - 134281 VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 134282 SOIL TESTING SERVICES # 134283 TGIF MINI PLAN # 134284 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134285 MEMBERSHIP MEETINO # 134286 PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 134287 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134288 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES # 134289 PRINTS # 134290 PROGRESS ESTIMATE # 134291 ELECTRICICAL SUPPLIES 134292 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134293 SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 1342~4 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134295 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 1342~6 PRINTING & MAIL SERVICES 134297 UNDERGROUND TANKS 134298 MAINT SUPPLIES # 1342~9 RECREATION REFUNDS 134300 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134301 STAFF MTG LUNCH 134302 OFFICE SUPPLIES 134303 MAINT SUPPLIES 134304 ~51 R & R AUTOMOTIVE 1,8~4.87 418 R M A GROUP 5,445.00 4451 R.C. GUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL 4o000.00 ~64 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 7.74 70 RANCHO CUCAMON~A CHAMBER 1&~.00 1050~ RANCHO PACIFIC DEV CORP 500.00 4130 RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE ~.3~ 5~14 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 39.18 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 428.9~ 4257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 6,153.20 2082 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 23.6~ 4704 RUSH, CHRIS 254.10 3745 SAFELITE GLASS CORP. 28D. 45 5~67 SALITO, SHARON 60.00 5538 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 148.13 261 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 35.10 5029 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPT. 15.39 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC 437.47 111~8 SANCHEZ, RICHARD 5.00 5317 SANTANA, LIVIER 304.20 11170 SAVORY 225.00 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. 435.00 351 SIGN SHOP, THE 242.44 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-02-98 (98/99) RUN DATE: 12/02/98 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. *~ CHEC½# OVERLAP ~0~6 SLOUCH~FRIENDS, INC., THE RECREATION, ENTERTAINMENT 134305 100.00 135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC REGISTRATION 134306 5~03 SOLIS, EDWARD CONTRACT SERVICES 134307 ~4 134308 - 134310 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 134311 37,316.71 5281 STERICYCLE, INC. SHARPS PROGRAM # 134312 174.22 11138 SUBWAY MEETING SUPPLIES 134313 43.20 5658 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 134314 113.14 5410 T & D INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES 134315 347.56 2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 134316 28.&5 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES # 134317 10,172.08 456~ TEE'S PLUS POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES 134318 11o974.15 3942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 134319 847.00 2718 TERRY, DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134320 231.00 1~19 TOMAR½ SPORTS INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 134321 648.64 5~7 TRIMBLE NAVIGATION COMPUTER PROGRAM & SUPPLIES # 134322 12,434.36 1116~ TRUONG, G.C. RECREATION REFUNDS 134323 5455 TYPECARE TYPEWRITER REPAIRS 134324 47.40 4558 U.S. GUARDS CO., INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 134325 2,052.31 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE # 134326 82.00 535~ VILLICANAo DEBORAH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 134327 48.60 4~ VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLIN~ 134328 4714 VPD LIBRARY SUPPLIES 13432~ ~4.37 ~4 134330 - 134330 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 134331 6,309.72 50~ XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 134332 &~.57 2021 YORA INDUSTRIES GRAFFITI REMOVER # 134333 2,058.03 TOTAL 520,520.17 'k CITY 3F R~NCHO CUCAMONGA LiST OF WARRANTS N~R PERIOD: 11-25-98 VENDOR 5155 20942 4635 $832 5957 1826 440? bo7 3637 ~0967 6153 4441 4407 20968 481 2096~ 5746 1061 2470 130 4O18 5401 4545 5~1 4205 9?? 3364 6041 229 3088 4895 744 4540 39~Z 38~7 5387 137 137 RUN DATE: i1/24/93 P~GE: 1 NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMY. ~ CHECKa OVERLAP U.S. BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT 132496~ 4,050.00- (4( 132497 - 133320 CRIUARO, DOLLRES RECREATION REFUND 133321~ 24.00- <<< 133322 - 133678 >>> COSTCO RECREATION SUPPLIES 133679~ 565.60 <<< 133680 - 133924 >>> A ~ K PHOTOGRAPHy PHOTO OEVELOPING ~ SUPPLIES 133925 43o78 ACEKA PROTECTION SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 133926 3,459.8~ ADVANCED SYSTEMS APPL. & PRODUCTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 13392? 17,015o22 <(< 133928 - 133928 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS ~ 1333~9 2,413.30 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS C~. INSTaLLATION/SERVICE 133930 212.~0 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 133931 33~.00 <<< 133932 - 133932 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ViS~ MONTHLY BILLINGS ~ 13~933 £,6U0.45 ASPA M~MB£RSHIP DUES 133934 50°00 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133935 16.66 BANDHOLTZ, BOB RZCREATION REFUND 133936 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS CC~ TITLE 19 COMPLETE AMENDS 133937 I15.00 BEST 6U¥ CJ., INC. ]~FIC~ SUPPLIES e 133938 1,019.92 BETTER ENERG~ IDEAS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 133939 1,70!.21 B[LASH, ANN RECREATION REFUND 133940 30.00 BLUE $HIELD/CAR~ AMERICA MEDICAL PREMIUM 133941 BETT~N~ THERESA RcCRE~TION REFUNO 1339&2 ~0.00 BR~DART BOG~S LibRARY SUPPLIES ~ 133943 3,152.79 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES M~INT[NANCE SUPPLIES m 133944 3,2BT.55 CHAMPION AWARDS ~ SPECIALITIES kNGRAVED PLAQUE ~ 133945 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 133946 373.b9 COMPUTER S~RVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 133947 0,22~.46 CkEATIVE LIGHTING MAINT~NANC£ SUPPLIES 133~48 1,~00.00 <<< 133949 - 1339~1 CUCAMDNGA C2 WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS m 133952 16,~32.44 CUSTOM MICROFILM SYSTEMS~ INC. OFFIC~ SUPPLIES ~ 133953 2,468.51 DATAZ, INC. OxFICE SUPPLIES 133954 793.77 DEPT. 3F TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTRCL PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES 133955 04.00 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 133956 53.10 E S R I, INC. SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 133957 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 133958 400.30 EMERY, KAREN REIMEURSEMENT 133959 12.50 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 133960 186.53 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 133961 250.00 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133962 10~743o75 FUNDSEL~CT DEFERRED COMP 133963 2,132.00 GALE RESEARCH~ INC. LIBRARY ~30KS 133964 112o65 G[BBY'S FENCING MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133965 1,761o55 GOMEZ, RICK REIMBURSEMENT 133966 19.60 GREEN ROCK POW~R E~UIPM~NT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133967 861.98 GOT TELECOM CALIFORNIA INTERNET SERVICES 133968 1,060.00 ((( 133969- 133969 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS ~ 133970 2,661.79 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 133971 61,892.60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 11-25-98 (98/99) RUN DATE: 11/24/~ PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM ION WARR NO WARR. AMT. *~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 6029 GTR TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13397Z 4525 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133973 5699 HARALAM805 BEVERAGE COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES I33974 31049 HASBROUCKt ALISA RECREATION 133975 1Z34 HO~EMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I33976 495 HYORD-SCAPE PRODUCTSt INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133977 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-AS7 DEFERRED COMP I33978 588Z ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 01 # 133979 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133980 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 13398! 5193 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133982 855 INTERSECTION DEVELOPMENT CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133983 1941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRONt INC. MAINT SUPPLIES . 133984 5~29 KiNGSLeY DEPOSITORY CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES ~ 133985 5059 KINKO'S COPIES RECREATION SUPPLIES 133996 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 133987 4982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION C.O.B.G. 133988 17Z RDZLOVICH~ DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYNENT 133989 4764 KULI IMAGE INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES e 133990' 4217 LADNER COATINGS EMERGENCY INSTALLATION 133991 31050 LAVERTUt JUOITH RECREATION 133992 849 LAWSON PRODUCTSt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 133993 1455 LONG°S ORUGS FILM PROCESSING 133994 566Z LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 133995 ((( 133996 - 133996 3~56 LU°S LIGHTMCUSE~ INC. OIL &NALYSZS ! 133997 2448 LUBRICATION ENGINEERSt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 133998 31051 MAN~ALAt ANNETTE RECREATION 133999 7Z MARK CHRISt INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134000 ½T63 MARKS CAbLEVISION ADVERTISING 134001 2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. g3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 134002 5301 NZW WEST SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 134003 Z361 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES MAINTENANCE ~ 13400& 3600 NIELSEN. NETTIE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134005 ½3~ NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 134006 6025 NTIS RECREATION REFUND 13400T 31052 NUNEZ, MIKE R~CREATION 134008 .0~8 OLO HICKORY CONSTR~TION CHA~FEY GARCIA BaRN CONST. ~ 134009 31055 OLEN, PHYLLIS RECREATION 134010 3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. ~IRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 134011 Z24 ORANGE COd~TY STRIPING SVC~ INC. ~USINESS LICENSE 134012 4904 OTTt LAURA INSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCISE CLASS ~ 134013 Z35 OWEN ELECTRIC M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134014 338 PACIFIC E~UIPT & IRRIGATION. INC. M~INTE~ANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134015 31057 PACIFIC POCLS 6U$INE$S LICENSE 134016 5.09 PARTSMASTERt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 134017 .57 PATTON SALES CORP. M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 13A018 ~1~56 P£ARCEt ANdREa REC~ATION 134019 31054 PEREZt MARC~ RECREATION 134020 z55 POMA OISTRI6uTING CO VEHICLE M~INTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES ~ 134021 758 PRAXAIR DISTRISUTIONt INC. MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 1340~Z 345.00 gl.00 431.55 38.00 76.6;> 1t161.82 7ZO.00 6t944o71 597.01 453.00 1,179.96 740.28 3tZ77.61 316.T9 275.24 587.50 61.20 593.57 5,000.00 52.00 1,022o26 7.53 197.77 8Z.54 35.00 434.91 765.00 5~.52 1,809.75 225.00 30.00 216.57 37.50 45.00 48,084.47 24.00 93.00 3,328.53 231.00 3 ~638..~5 59.90 11.66 12.0T 74.00 £0.00 12,331.82 96.30 J ,j VENDOR 31053 4025 27 05 264 5w~ 545 5665 11101 276 16 5072 .301 301 301 3249 336~ 3896 11162 692 1327 319 5903 ~432 2~7 902 ~008 5658 ~733 .- 5869 11,%1 1261 39~Z 1919 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 11-25-98 C98/99) RUN DATE: 11/24/'98 PAGe: 3 = === === = = = = = = = NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WAR~. AMY. = = ~= ~= =====: === ========================================= *'::-'~ CH2CK# (]VE~LAP PUTTNKDWSKI, CINDY RECREATION ~ 134023 R g R AUTOMOTIVE V~HICLE M21NT,SUPPLIES&SERVICE 134024 R d SUPPLY CO* M~INTEN~NCE SUPPLIES 134025 R.H.F., INC. V~HICL~ M&~NT SERVICECSUPPLIES 134026 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 134027 ~EO WING $HJc STORE S~F~TY 600TS ~ 13402~ RED WING SHOE STORE S~FETY ~00TS 134029 REGULaTICN COMPLIANCE, iNC. T?&iNiNG SERVICES 134030 R£PPEY, KRIS R£CREATION REFUNDS 134031 RIVERSIDE bLUEPRINT P~INTS ~ 134032 ROBLES, R~bL Po, SR. T~RE ~EP~IR 134033 ROSS ~IST~IBUTING CSRPU2~TION, RDN M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 134034 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134035 RT LAWRENCE CORPORATION COMPUTER CONSULTANTS " 134036 SAN BERN C6 AGRICULTURE DEPT. W~EO ABATEMENT SERVICES 134037 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE # 134038 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CSNTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 134039 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS C2~TR~CT SHERIFFS SERVICE 134040 SAN BERN CO SHERIFES C~NT2ACT SHS2IFFS SERVICE e 134041 SAN ~ERN CO ~klS wAST. MGMENT ~q~NT~LY S~kVIC~ 134042 SAN ~E~NARCZN3 COUNTY C~L-~ PT?GRAM 134043 SAN B~NARCIN2 COUNTY ~SCUNZNTARY HANDLING FEE 134044 SAN BERN&R£IN3 COUNTY FILING ~E 134045 SCHWAAB, INC. SU~FLIES m 134046 SEAL FURNITURE C SYST£MS INC. OPFICE SUPPLIES 1340~? SEFAC LiFT & E~UIPM~NT CORPORATION SERVICE &NO SUPPLIES ~ 134048 SENECHAL, CAt INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT # 13~049 SHARE~ TECH. FAIRCHIL~ TELECOM, INC TELEPHONE SERVICES ~ 134050 S~cLTON, KIMBERLY RECREATION REFUNDS 134051 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 134052 SIGN SHOP, THE MAINT SUPPLIES 134053 SIR SPEEDY FAXES 134054 SMART ~ FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 134055 <<< 134056 - 134056 SO CALIF E~ISDN CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS ~ 13405T SO CALIF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS BILLS 1~4058 SOLIS, EDWARD CONTRACT SERVICES 134059 <(( 134060 - 134066 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ~ 134067 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC. VEHICL£ M~INT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 134068 STANDARO PACIFIC REIMB TEMP UTILITIES 134069 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT,, INC. SERVICE ANO SUPPLIES # 13~070 STATE 2F CAeDEPARTMENT OF TRANS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 134071 STATE OF CALIF. LIBRARY FOUNDATION RECREATION REFUND 13~071 SUMMIT SAFETY PROOUCTS SUPPLIES 13~073 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 13407~ SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SOFTWARE AND MAINTENANCE e 134075 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 134076 TELEqUESTIDNS EVALUATION TELECOMM EQUIPMENT 134077 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 134078 TSMARK SPORTS INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 134079 130.00 ~l. OT 30~.40 104.3t ~T?.7~ 279.1~ b,405.15 ~o.00 47.50 134.05 195.1o 502.3o 31.25 d3o,2S..4£ 4,19~.60 51,57~.1~ 45,4~.00 33,221.7o 35.00 7.00 89.17 109.0~ 2,908.5Z 220.50 1,610.33 200.00 14~827.00 296.62 32.33 94.59 82,437.48 410.90 235.00 8,3bZ.44 91.55 1,290.00 22,872.00 8,236.20 69.15 64.71 250.76 8,593.03 245.00 400.00 420.00 206.44 CITY gF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: ll-ZS-98 (g8/99) RUN DATE: 11/24/98 PAGE: ~ VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHECKJ OVERLAP 11166 TORWALDSON, STEVE DISMISSED PARKING CIT PMT 13¢080 ~l.00 4558 UoS. GUARDS COot INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 13¢081 Zt031.88 350 U.S. POSTMASTER POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER 13¢082 g958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES # 13¢083 3t169.00 4788 UNDERGROUND SVC. ALERT OF SO. CALIF UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 13¢08¢ Z12.75 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES # 13¢085 465.63 ¢206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 15T AID KITS ~ 134086 238°39 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE $ 134087 56°40 gGSg UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 134088 5285 VIKING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES 134089 80o00 1103 VISTA PAINT MA:NT SUPPLIES 134090. 46~09 ¢78 WARREN : CO., CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS # 13409! 866.04 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAZNT SUPPLIES i ~34092 3,334.13 4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 134093 ~,I05.77 5526 WEST GROUP PUBLISHING ~ 13¢094 30BO WHITTIER FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES # ~34095 BOg.?4 X~63 WILLIAMS, ANGELIA RECREATION REFUNDS I34096 Z5~00 ¢BZ7 WORLD BOOK DIRECT MARKETING LIBRARY SUPPLIES 134097 Zl.gO 675 WYNN°S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # I3~09B 518.~1 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 1340gg 303.78 1l~64 ZAROUR, MANAL R~CREATION REFUNDS 134X00 65.00 34B ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # 13410! 217.73 ~l165 ZUNIGA, NANCY RECREATION REFUNDS 13410Z ZB.T5 TOTAL Investments ~tes o~ De~W~ - Bank Loc;d Agency Investment Funds Total Inve~tm~lts and Avm~l~m City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 1998 Cash Accrued Interest at Purchase Tolal Cash and Purchase Interest Total Clah and Invegtments Total Earnings Current Year Average Daily Balance /-) Par Market Book Value Value Value 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 15.941,372.24 15,941,372.24 15,941,372.24 59,515,000.00 59,949,637.50 59,485,865.60 2,000,000.00 2.022.600.00 1.996.250.00 100,591.82 104,342.26 95,648.00 85,867,496.26 86,328,484.20 85,829,666.04 1.318,206,18 87,185,702.44 November 30 Month Ending 488,070.89 87,317,983.09 Date 1,318,2o6.18 1,570.74 1,319,776.92 87,648,261.12 Fiscal Year To Date 2,262,223.96 87,670,508.79 6.16% 1,318,206.18 1,570.74 1,319,776.92 87,149,442.96 % of Days to YTM 3~0 YTM 365 Portfolio Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv. 9.68 365 138 5.438 5.512 18.57 1 I 5.481 5.557 6g.30 1,711 1,379 6.132 6.217 2.32 728 608 5.400 5.475 0.11 7,130 2,681 9.400 9.530 100.50% 1,246 987 5.930 6.012 Days to YTM 380 YTM 365 Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv. 1.973 2.000 1,246 987 5.930 6.012 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 7, 1998. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end mad(et values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pdcing service. Run Date: 12/0711998 · 17:0~ Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRe134 VS.00g CUSIP Imm~tment # Iseuer 243-954720 01013 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 243-954752 01023 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 6509-28~49 ~ 01012 SANWA 650928649 ~ 01014 SANWA 6509-28649 ~ 01021 SANWA Subtotal end Average Average Balance 6,310,532.20 Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 16,934,705.57 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAl. HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 31331RDX0 00996 31331RMS1 01002 3133IRMA0 01004 31331RPZ2 01008 31331RUG8 01022 31331HRC3 01027 31331RYP4 01028 313393VK3 00971 3133~"YK5 00989 31331~TU5 00997 3133~ O1OO3 3133M2TM9 01005 3133M3KQ7 01011 3133~1 01019 3133M5874 O1O29 3133MSFX3 01031 3134A1LB4 00994 3134Al1'145 01 050 3134A13B4 01007 3134A14F4 01009 31~,A14R8 01010 3134A2PN2 01030 3134A2XJ2 01033 31354CRP5 00981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 1998 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value 03/18/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 06/09/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 03/05/1998 1.000,000.00 1,000,000.00 03/16/1998 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 05/28/1998 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6,310,532.20 6,310,532.20 15,941,372.24 15,941,372.24 15,941,372.24 15,941,372.24 03/27/1997 2,000,000.00 2,041,800.00 07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2,079,400.00 01/07/1998 1,000,000.00 1,011,900.00 01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,021,200.00 02/05/1998 2,500,000.00 2,504,750.00 05/27/1998 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00 08/06/1998 1,515,000.00 1,518,787.50 08/1111998 2,000,000.00 2,011,200.00 03/1911996 1,000,000.00 1,001,900.00 04/02/1997 2,000,000.00 2,008,800.00 07/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1.009,400.00 01/06/1998 1,000,000.00 1.050,000.00 12/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1,055,600.00 02/27/1998 2,500,000.00 2,501,500.00 05/28/1998 2,000,000.00 2,001,800.00 08/27/1998 2,000,000.00 1,991:200.00 08/2611998 2,000,000.00 1,996,200.00 06/25/1997 3,000,000.00 3,054,300.00 10/22/1997 2,000,000.00 2,040,600.00 02/02/1998 1,000,000.00 998,800.00 02/18/1998 2,000,000.00 1,996,200.00 02/19/1998 1,000,000.00 997,800.00 08120/1998 2,000,000.00 1,996,800.00 11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 111291199~ 2,000,000.00 2,019,400.00 Page 2 Stated YTM 360 Day~ to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date 2,000,000.00 5.500 5.500 107 03/18/1999 2,000,000.00 5.400 5.400 190 05/0911999 1,000,000.00 5.500 5.500 98 03/0911999 1,810,532.20 5.400 5.400 105 03/16/1999 1,500,000.00 5.400 5400 176 0B/26/1~ 6,310,532.20 6.438 138 15,g41,372.24 15,~41,372.24 5.557 5.481 1 5.481 I 2,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 1,212 03/27/2002 1,999,375.00 6.240 6.162 1,324 07/17/2002 1,000,000.00 6.330 6.243 1,498 01/07/2003 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 1,497 01/06/2003 2,500,000.00 6.140 5.973 1,527 02/05/2003 1,999,375.00 6.290 6.211 1,638 05/27/2003 1,514,303.10 5.500 5.472 245 08/03/1999 2,000,000.00 6.130 6.046 1,714 06/1112003 995,312.50 5.880 5.970 105 03/16/1999 2,000,000.00 6.540 6.450 853 04/02/2001 1,000,000.00 6.544 6.454 1,337 07/30/2002 1,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 1,497 01/(~/2003 1,000,000.00 6.110 6.028 1,123 12/28/2001 2,500,000.00 6.100 6.016 1,184 02/27/2002 2,000,000.00 6.130 6.048 1,274 05/28/2002 2,000,000.00 6.140 6.056 1,730 08/27/2003 2,000,000.00 6.050 5,g18 1,364 08/26/2002 3,000,000.00 6.630 6.537 1,150 01/24/2002 2,000,000.00 6.320 6.233 1,421 10/22/2002 99g,375.00 6.183 6.113 1,520 01/29/2003 2,000,000.00 6.160 6.076 1,540 02/16/2003 1,000,000.00 6.135 6.051 1,541 02/lg/2003 2,000,000.00 6.050 5.967 1,723 08/20/2003 2,000,000.00 5.790 5.711 1,819 11/24/2003 2,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 1,094 1112912001 Run Date: 17J0711996 - 17:08 Portfolio CITY CP (P~F_P~v~2) SymRe~ vs.oog CUSIP Investment # Federal Agency Issue~ - Coupon 31364CSJ8 00~4 31364CJ58 00992 31264FQE4 01O06 31384FC33 01016 31364FG96 01018 31364GBE8 01032 Treesuni Securities - Coupon 9126274M1 01026 Mortgage Backed Securities 3134OLWW7 0o071 3126(~J21 00203 36215wx74 ooo02 36215XZS4 00069 Average Issuer Balance FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL IvrrG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal and Avenge 58,864,0~8.73 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average 1,996,250.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 96,653.75 Total Inv#t~ta and Aver~ 86Ao2Ato.25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 1998 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value 12/1 2/1996 2,000,000.00 2,001,800.00 05/05/1997 2,000,000.00 2,056,500.00 0112711998 4,000,000.00 4,006,400.00 05/04/1998 3,000,000.00 3,048,900.00 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,027,600.00 10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,983,800.00 59,515,000.00 59,949,637.50 08103/1998 2,0~,600.00 02/23/1987 14,909.92 15,182.77 09115/1987 59,481.57 62,241.51 06/23/1986 24,507.74 25,171.90 05/23/1986 1,692.59 1,746.08 100,591.82 104,342.26 85,867,496.26 88,328,494.20 Page 3 Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date 1,980,000.00 6.160 6.291 1,109 12/14/2001 2,000,000.00 7.070 6.973 1,254 05/08/2002 3,998,125.00 0,150 6,077 1,518 0112712003 3,000,000.00 6.280 6.194 1,616 05/05/2003 2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 1,630 05/1912003 2,000,000.00 5.670 5.592 1,770 10/06/2003 59,,485,665.60 6.132 1,379 1,996,250.00 5.375 5.400 608 0713112000 1,996,250.00 5.400 608 14,802.70 8.000 8.219 1,127 01/0112002 54,946.10 8.500 10.018 4,292 09/0112010 24,170.76 8.500 8.778 893 05/12/2001 1,726.44 9.000 8.547 835 03/15/2001 85,646.00 9.400 2,861 85,8~,6~6.04 5.6~ ~7 Ru~ Date: 12/071199~ - 17~3~ Portfolio CITY CP (PRF_P~!2) SymRe~ rS.00; CUSIP Investment # ~ Checking/Savings Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Cash Subtotal and Average ~ Interest at Purchaa4 Total Cash and Pu~ Interest Total Cash and Investments Average Balance 1,115,772.85 87,317,983.09 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash November 30, 1998 Purchase Date Par Value 87,185,702,44 Market Value 1,318,206.18 87,648p~61.12 Stated YTM 360 Day~ to Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity 1,318,206.18 1,318,206.18 1,570.74 1,319,776.92 87,149,442.96 2.000 1.973 I ~7 Page 4 Ru~ Dete: 12/07/199~ - 17:08 P(xtfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PId2) SymRept VS.00g Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type November 1, 1998 through November 30, 1998 Page 5 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases CUSIP Investment ~ Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits Certificates of Deposit - Bank Subtotal 8,310,532.20 Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.557 1,000,000.00 Subtotal 17,741,372.24 1,000,000.00 Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2.000 3,368,000.00 Subtotal 581,206.18 3,368,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31339BZZ8 00940 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.240 11130/1998 0.00 3134A2XJ2 01033 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 5.790 11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 Subtotal 58,428,834.35 2,000,000.00 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 1,996,250.00 313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 11/16/1998 0.00 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 11125/1998 0.00 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 6.500 11/t6/1998 · 0.00 36215XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 11/16/1998 0.00 Subtotal 97,422.90 0.00 Total 87,155,617.87 6,368,000.00 Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals 2,800,000.00 2,800,000.00 2,631,000.00 2,631,000.00 942,968.75 0.00 942,968.75 496.65 397.66 823.36 59.23 1,776.90 6,375,745.65 Ending Balance 8,310,532.20 15,941,372.24 1,318,206.18 58,4asAs6.~0 87,147,872.22 Ru~ Date: 12.~7119cJ6 - 17.1)6 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep~ V5.00g CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: December l 6, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS / SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE FUNDING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD (HIGHLAND AVENUE / DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG (Contract No. 99-0 ! 5) for the funding and construction ofthe Highland Avenue Realignment and the construction of Day Creek Boulevard (Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project). A certified copy of the Resolution along with the executed copies of the Cooperative Agreement will be forwarded to SANBAG for their execution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In accordance with both CalTrans and SANBAG policy, Day Creek Boulevard must be in place prior to the construction of the Route 30 Freeway in order for the Day Creek Boulevard interchange to be constructed. The City is therefore moving forward with the construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Base Line Road. To allow for the construction of the Day Creek Boulevard interchange, Highland Avenue must be substantially realigned to the south. This is required in order to provide room for the east bound interchange ramps and to provide adequate separation, per CalTrans standards, between the ramp intersection at Day Creek Boulevard and the intersection of Highland Avenue with Day Creek Boulevard This realignment needs to be complete prior to the construction of the Day Creek Boulevard interchange. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SANBAG AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 16, 1998 Page 2 The Day Creek Boulevard construction and the Highland Avenue realignment are closely related and should occur in the same general time frame, therefore the two projects will be constructed together. Under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will administer the contract and pay all costs associated with the construction of Day Creek Boulevard SANBAG will reimburse the City for all costs associated with the construction of the Highland portion, and will either directly provide construction management support or reimburse the City for those costs. SANBAG will also provide plans, utility relocations, and right of way for the realignment project. The City will administer the overall contract. The Agreement was approved by the SANBAG Board of Directors on November 4, ! 998. On November 4, 1998, the San Bernardino Associated Governments Board of Directors approved by minute action the Cooperative Agreement. This agreement provides $1,518,743 of Measure I Valley Project funds for construction plus of $225,000 for construction engineering, for a total of $1,743,743. The proposed cooperative agreement does not save SANBAG any costs, but it ensures that two critical components necessary to allow Route 30 construction to proceed on schedule will be in place. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachment 5- ,~2ozzcr ! L NT,$, FUTI/RE ~UTE 3Q FIT': IIIGIi'uLID AV &,q,SE LJIE RD $UGMGITiI PROJECT LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DAY CREEK BL. PROJECT NTS RESOLUTION NO. q ?.-,~,7 / 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS / SAN BERMARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHLAND AVENUE / DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City"), has for its consideration and execution, the Cooperative Agreement with the San Bernardino Associated Governments / San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to as "SANBAG") for the proposed Highland Avenue / Day Creek Boulevard Project and WHEREAS, SANBAG and the City are in mutual accord with the conditions specified in the attached Cooperative Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I--fEREBY RESOLVES that said Cooperative Agreement be approved and accepted and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this resolution to all copies of said Agreement and mail said copy to SANBAG. /q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BASE LINE ROAD TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32.-4637-9710 AND ACCOUNT NO. 22- 4637-9710 'RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of the Highland Avenue Realignment and the Construction of Day Creek Boulevard from Highland Avenue to Base Line Road, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGRO UN D/A NA LYS IS: Highland Avenue Realignment is from 1,247 feet west of Day Creek Boulevard to 787 feet east of Day Creek Boulevard, the scope of work to be performed consists of, but is not limited to the construction of asphalt concrete roadway, storm drain, concrete curb and gutter, installation of a traffic signal, street lights, signing and striping. Day Creek Boulevard is from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue, the scope of work consists of but is not limited to the construction of the west half of the asphalt concrete roadway, storm drain, earthen channel, street lights, concrete curb and gutter, traffic signing and striping. The project is to be funded from Measure 'T' funds, Account No. 32-4637-9710 and Transportation System Development funds, Account No. 22- 4637-9710. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD December 16, 1998 Page 2 The Highland Avenue Realignment plans were prepared by Parsons, Brinckerhoff of San Bernardino under the direction of SANBAG and approved by the City Engineer. The Day Creek Boulevard plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved be the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for Highland Avenue is $1,331,260, the Engineer's estimate for Day Creek Boulevard is $2,242,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 12, 1999 and January 26, 1999, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 16, 1999. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:leh Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7-':;Z / ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE REALIGNMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN' SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WI-IEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "The Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment and The Construction of Day Creek Boulevard From Highland Avenue to Base Line Road Improvement Project". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hourof2:00 P.M. on February 16, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the "The Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment and The Construction of Day Creek Boulevard From Highland Avenue to Base Line Road Improvement Project" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of"The Construction of Highland Avenue Realignment and The Construction of Day Creek Boulevard From Highland Avenue to Base Line Road Improvement Project". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro- visions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or go When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or Go When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjoumeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (I 00%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 16th day of December 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 16th day of December 1998. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: January 12, 1999 January 26, 1999 ...F'- NT.S. ORJG/HAL POOR QUALITy LOCATION DAY CREE'~ BLVD. CITY OF R,LNCHO CU,fA!'/,ONCA - CJTY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY- OWNED EOUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION That City Council approval be given to surplus the City-owned equipment on the attached listing which is either no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. BACKGROUND The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property: material and supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City to request that the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Manager to dispose of City property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of surplus can be transfer to another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply disposing of the equipment. The majority of items to be surplused is computer-related equipment. If Council is in agreement, this equipment will be given to the Detwiler Foundation Computer for Schools Program which is based in La Jolla, California. This organization, in conjunction with the California Department of Corrections, refurbishes and upgrades equipment and in turn donates it to area schools. All City school districts were contacted and declined the City's offer of donation of these computers. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence i~ Attach. SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Echo PB 400E Backpack Blower, Tag E5166, S/N 236966 Key Duplicating Machine, Fixed Asset #637 Dictaphone Transcription Unit, Fixed Asset #00767 Unit 512, Fixed Asset #0026, 1984 Chevrolet C20 Pick Up Truck Mita DC-111 Copier, Fixed Asset # E677 Unit 514, Fixed Asset #0764, 1988 Ford Pick Up Truck HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 1 HP ERGO MONITOR 2 HP VECTRA CPU 3 HP ERGO MONITOR 4 HP VECTRA CPU 5 HP ERGO MONITOR 6 HP VECTRA CPU 7 HP ERGO MONITOR 8 HP VECTRA CPU 9 HP ERGO MONITOR 10 HP VECTRA CPU 11 HP ERGO MONITOR 12 HP VECTRA CPU 13 HP ERGO MONITOR 14 HP VECTRA CPU 15 HP ERGO MONITOR 16 HP VECTRA CPU 17 HP ERGO MONITOR 18 HP VECTRA CPU 19 HP ERGO MONITOR 20 HP VECTRA CPU 21 HP ERGO MONITOR 22 HP VECTRA CPU 23 HP ERGO MONITOR 24 HP VECTRA CPU 25 HP ERGO MONITOR 26 HP VECTRA CPU 27 HP ERGO MONITOR 28 HP VECTRA CPU 29 HP ERGO MONITOR 30 HP VECTRA CPU 31 HP ERGO MONITOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED B Y: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. BOX # KR42355176 G.D. 14 3424A05900 01288 G.D. 14 KR42456213 G.D. 15 3419A00365 01317 G.D. 15 KR43402126 G.D. 16 3424A04885 01300 G.D. 16 KR42354835 G,D. 17 3424A04783 01260 G.D. 17 KR42355140 G.D. 18 3419A00359 01243 G.D. 18 KR42355175 G.D. 19 3424A05010 01312 G.D. 19 KR54267390 G.D. 20 3419A01136 01223 G.D. 20 KR42354973 G.D. 21 3424A05757 01291 G.D. 21 KR42051504 G.D. 22 3424A04985 01311 G.D. 22 KR42354999 G.D. 23 3424A05008 01316 G.D. 23 KR42354994 G.D. 24 3424A04781 01315 G.D. 24 KR42355173 26 3424A05814 01289 26 KR42355159 27 3424A05009 01318 27. KR42051426 28 3424A06063 01287 28 KR42353737 29 3424A04798 01268 29 KR33401555 30 11/17/98 COMMENTS DAWN BATES DAWN BATES KAREN FINCHER KAREN FINCHER GEORGE RIVERA GEORGE RIVERA DIANE MONROE DIANE MONROE LARRY TEMPLE LARRY TEMPLE BRIGIT TATE BRIGIT TATE GUEST (GIS) GUEST (GIS) JOAN KRUSE JOAN KRUSE RONDA CONNELLY RONDA CONNELLY MARY ANN SALAIZ MARY ANN SALAIZ SUSAN FERNANDEZ SUSAN FERNANDEZ CHUCK VARNEY CHUCK VARNEY CAROLE GONZALEZ CAROLE GONZALEZ DENISE UDELL DENISE UDELL SHIRR'L GRIFFIN SHIRR'L GRIFFIN KATHY SCOTT PAGE 1 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 32 HP VEGTRA CPU 33 HP ERGO MONITOR 34 HP VECTRA CPU 35 HP ERGO MONITOR 36 HP VECTRA CPU 37 HP ERGO MONITOR 38 HP VECTRA CPU 39 NBI SYSTEM LOCAL DATA INC. QUIET 4O 300 41 COMPUSCAN 42 CALCOMP 1044 43 HP ERGO MONITOR 44 HP VECTRA CPU 45 HP ERGO MONITOR 46 HP VECTRA CPU 47 HP ERGO MONITOR 48 HP VECTRA CPU 49 HP ERGO MONITOR 50 HP VECTRA CPU 51 HP ERGO MONITOR 52 HP VECTRA CPU 53 HP ERGO MONITOR 54 HP VECTRA CPU 55 HP ERGO MONITOR 56 HP VECTRA CPU 57 HP ERGO MONITOR 58 HP VECTRA CPU 59 HP ERGO MONITOR 60 HP VECTRA CPU 61 HP ERGO MONITOR 62 HP VECTRA CPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. 11/17/98 SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX# 3424A05826 01269 30 KR41542705 31 3424A06007 01270 31 KR42355158 32 3424A04928 01265 32 KR42355153 33 3424A04862 01266 33 452571 00463 34 81205475 738D004 KR42355171 3419A01139 KR42354836 3424A04788 KR42355182 3424A05006 KR53459406 3419A00353 KR42355185 3424A05815 KR42353696 3424A04754 KR42355131 3424A05816 KR42355167 3424A04863 KR42456199 3424A05941 KR42051841 3424A05656 00274 35 E608 36 00501 37 38 01259 01248 01295 01297 01242 1307 01244 01331 01336 01346 PAGE 2 COMMENTS KATHY SCOTT DIANE O'NEAL DIANE O'NEAL JERRY FULWOOD JERRY FULWOOD DEBBIE ADAMS DEBBIE ADAMS MARTI HIGGINS 38 MARTI HIGGINS 39 JANA ELLIS 39 JANA ELLIS 40 BLDG SAFTY CASE 40 BLDG SAFTY CASE 41 BLDG SAFTY COUNTER 41 BLDG SAFTY COUNTER 42 MELISSA MORALES 42 MELISSA MORALES 43 BEA SMIDEALE 43 BEA SMIDEALE 44 DONNA AUSTIN 44 DONNA AUSTIN 45 LUCI URIBE 45 LUCI URIBE 46 TAMMY PELTZER 46 TAMMY PELTZER 47 JOI SIMPSON 47 JOI SIMPSON HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 63 HP ERGO MONITOR 84 HP VECTRA CPU 65 HP ERGO MONITOR 66 HP VECTRA CPU 67 HP ERGO MONITOR 68 HP VECTRA CPU 69 HP ERGO MONITOR 70 HP VECTRA CPU 71 HP ERGO MONITOR 72 HP VECTRA CPU 73 HP ERGO MONITOR 74 HP VECTRA CPU 75 HP ERGO MONITOR 76 HP VECTRA CPU 77 HP ERGO MONITOR 78 HP VECTRA CPU 79 HP ERGO MONITOR 80 HP VECTRA CPU 81 HP ERGO MONITOR 82 HP VECTRA CPU 83 HP ERGO MONITOR 84 HP VECTRA CPU 85 HP ERGO MONITOR 86 HP VECTRA CPU 87 HP ERGO MONITOR 88 HP VECTRA CPU 89 HP ERGO MONITOR 90 HP VECTRA CPU 91 HP ERGO MONITOR 92 HP VECTRA CPU 93 HP ERGO MONITOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. 11/17/98 SERIAL NUMBER F/A # KR42355267 3424A04929 01322 KR3371195 3424A04882 01323 KR52955332 3424A04905 01271 KR42353697 3424A04889 01332 KR33812729 3424A04921 01321 KR42352393 3419A00371 01320 KR42776986 3419A01137 01308 KR43403030 3434A03850 00308 KR43400113 3424A06103 01334 KR42354787 3424A04855 01298 KR33813985 3419A00347 01220 KR33711133 3419A00356 01241 KR33711197 3424A05904 01281 KR42355157 3424A0478 01258 KR42051474 3424A04769 01275 KR42355009 LOC. BOX # COMMENTS 48 JEANENNE SPIKES 48 JEANENNE SPIKES 49 SONIA MULLIGAN 49 SONIA MULLIGAN 50 MARY LOU GREGG 50 MARY LOU GREGG 51 JOYCE KESSLER 51 JOYCE KESSLER 52 GAlL SANCHEZ 52 GAlL SANCHEZ 53 NINA MONTANO 53 NINA MONTANO 54 MARY VOSS 54 MARY VOSS 55 RICK GOMEZ 55 RICK GOMEZ 56 COMM. SVCS. GENERAL 56 COMM. SVCS. GENERAL 57 RAMON RAMIREZ 57 RAMON RAMIREZ 58 PAT MORRISON 58 PAT MORRISON 59 TRIClA ASHBY 59 TRIClA ASHBY 61 JERRY DYER 61 JERRY DYER 62 MIKE LONG 62 MIKE LONG 63 SUE DODRILL 63 SUE DODRILL 64 LINDA BEEK PAGE 3 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 94 HP VECTRA CPU 95 HP ERGO MONITOR 96 HP VECTRA CPU 97 HP ERGO MONITOR 98 HP VECTRA CPU 99 HP ERGO MONITOR 100 HP VECTRA CPU 101 HP ERGO MONITOR 102 HP VECTRA CPU 103 HP ERGO MONITOR 104 HP VECTRA CPU 105 HP ERGO MONITOR 106 HP VECTRA CPU 107 HP ERGO MONITOR 108 HP VECTRA CPU 109 HP ERGO MONITOR 110 HP VECTRA CPU 111 HP ERGO MONITOR 112 HP VECTRA CPU 113 HP ERGO MONITOR 114 HP VECTRA CPU 115 HP ERGO MONITOR 116 HP VECTRA CPU 117 HP ERGO MONITOR 118 HP VECTRA CPU 119 HP ERGO MONITOR 120 HP VECTRA CPU 121 HP ERGO MONITOR 122 HP VECTRA CPU 123 HP ERGO MONITOR 124 HP VECTRA CPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIALNUMBER F/A# 3424A04913 01257 KR43503076 3419A01130 01222 KR42355019 3419A00362 01256 KR42354880 3424A04872 01279 KR42355141 3419A00870 01273 KR42354984 3424A04986 01276 KR42051513 3424A05903 01277 KR42353658 3424A04950 01254 KR42354841 3424A04977 01253 KR42051518 3419A00350 01249 KR42354988 3419A00342 01255 KR4235165 3424A05828 01335 KR42355134 3424A04766 000109 KR33711202 3424A04930 01282 KR42355292 3419A00357 01221 KR42051498 3424A04940 01293 LOC. 11/17/98 BOX # COMMENTS 64 LINDA BEEK 65 LUCI SAUNDERS 65 LUCI SAUNDERS 66 JUDY ACOSTA 66 JUDY ACOSTA 67 LINDA WYMAN 67 LINDA WYMAN 68 VICKI DAY-CHILICKI 68 VICKI DAY-CHILICKI 69 ENG. SECRETARY POOL 69 ENG. SECRETARY POOL 70 DIANE WHYTE 70 DIANE WHYTE 71 AKBAR RIZVI 71 AKBAR RIZVI 72 MIKE OLIVIER 72 MIKE OLIVIER 73 JON GILLESPIE 73 JON GILLESPIE 74 JIM HARRIS 74 JIM HARRIS 75 COMM. SVCS. OLD REG. 75 COMM. SVCS. OLD REG. 77 BARRYE HANSON 77 SURPLUS 2 78 KAREN MCQUIRE-EMERY 78 KAREN MCQUIRE-EMERY 80 LAURA BONACORSI 80 LAURA BONACORSI 81 RON NEE 81 RON NEE PAGE 4 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 125 HP ERGO MONITOR 126 HP VECTRA CPU 127 HP ERGO MONITOR 128 HP VECTI:~, CPU 129 HP ERGO MONITOR 130 HP VECTRA CPU 131 HP ERGO MONITOR 132 HP VECTRA CPU 133 COMPAQ CPU 134 COMPAQ MONITOR 135 HP ERGO MONITOR 136 HP VECTRA CPU 137 HP ERGO MONITOR 138 HP VECTRA CPU 139 HP ERGO MONITOR 140 HP VECTRA CPU 141 HP ERGO MONITOR 142 HP VECTRA CPU 143 HP ERGO MONITOR 144 HP VECTRA CPU 145 COMPAQ CPU 146 COMPAQ MONITOR 147 HP ERGO MONITOR 148 HP VECTRA CPU 149 HP ERGO MONITOR 150 HP VECTRA CPU 151 COMPAQ MONITOR 152 HP VECTRA CPU 153 COMPAQ CPU 154 COMPAQ MONITOR 155 COMPAQ CPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX# KR42051357 85 3424A04780 01252 85 KR42355053 86 3424A05605 01285 86 KR42355174 87 3424A04963 01286 87 KR42051907 88 3420A00865 01215 88 CNT75MBF74A 01153 90 0281454~4N585 90 KR52956198 91 3420A00521 01213 91 KR42456200 92 3424A0770 01250 92 KR43403035 93 3434A0249 000191 93 KR43499252 94 3424A04799 0000111 94 KR43808579 95 3434A04237 000197 95 6247HBN20852 000002 96 2274260H9605 96 KR47051445 97 3419A03687 01274 97 KR42051501 102 :3424A04891 01294 102 334401U293 105 3419A00338 01208 105 A339HER31756 01157 106 33442601U291 106 A339HER341384 01156 108 PAGE 5 11/17/98 COMMENTS KEN FUNG BARRYE HANSON LORETTA LOIKO LORETTA LOIKO CHRIS PITTENGER CHRIS PITTENGER LIRIO ROSAS LIRIO ROSAS LIBRARY LIBRARY PARTS WAREHOUSE PARTS WAREHOUSE ANTHONY ALVAREZ ANTHONY ALVAREZ CURT LANCE CURT LANCE ROB BOCK ROB BOCK MARIA PEREZ MARIA PEREZ LOUISE LANTZ LOUISE LANTZ POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE JOE HENRY HAR.DWAR DESCRIPTION 156 HP ERGO MONITOR 157 COMPAQ MONITOR 158 HP VECTRA CPU 159 ASI MONITOR 160 HP VECTRA CPU 161 COMPAQ CPU 162 COMPAQ MONITOR 163 HP ERGO MONITOR 164 HP VECTRA CPU 165 HP ERGO MONITOR 166 HP VECTRA CPU 167 HP ERGO MONITOR 168 HP VECTRA CPU 169 HP ERGO MONITOR 170 HP VECTRA CPU 171 HP ERGO MONITOR 172 HP VECTRA CPU 173 HP ERGO MONITOR 174 HP VECTRA CPU 175 HP ERGO MONITOR 176 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU 177 HP ERGO MONITOR 178 HP VECTRA CPU 179 HP ERGO MONITOR 180 HP VECTRA CPU 181 HP ERGO MONITOR 182 HP VECTRA CPU 183 COMPAQ 386 CPU 184 COMPAQ MONITOR 185 COMPAQ MONITOR 186 HP VECTRA CPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # KR34218781 02814544N812 3424A04809 01272 0384U1C2124 3424A05759 01330 A339H ER31047 01155 3.34426E+ 11 KR33813062 3424A05989 01328 KR33813064 3424A04931 01310 KR42353665 3424A05028 KR33813060 3420A00530 01216 KR42355001 3419A01133 01225 KR33813072 3424A04771 01261 KR42051838 3415S00659 01201 KR33812725 3424A05702 01290 KR33812732 3424A05589 01278 KR33812721 3419A01138 01251 4034HT8H 1444 00867 02814544N400 02814544N975 3424A05906 01284 LOC. 11/17/98 PAGE 6 BOX # COMMENTS 108 JOE HENRY 111 111 112 112 113 113 115 115 116 116 118 118 119 119 120 120 122 122 123 123 124 BRAD BULLER 124 BRAD BULLER 125 DAN COLEMAN 125 DAN COLEMAN 126 126 127 127 128 128 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 2O9 210 211 212 213 214 215 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION HP ERGO MONITOR HP VECTRA PENTIUM CPU CTX MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU NBI 2000 WORKSTATION W/KEYBOARD DIABLO 630 PRINTER NBI CPU SYSTEM W/ SAMSUNG MONITOR HP LASER JET III HP LASER JET IIID HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU HP DESKJET 2686A APPLE CPU APPLE MONITOR HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU APPLE CPU APPLE MONITOR HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR HP VECTRA CPU HP DESKJET 660C APPLE CPU APPLE MONITOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIALNUMBER F/A# LOC. BOX# KR42354838 129 US72707113 286 28064907071 3424A05007 01283 GAl186018 00306 48325 AA1735008 00329 135 310FJD5782 136 B3022J16530 00843 137 KR42355151 139 3419A00361 01327 139 MY53418667 140 3419A00348 01236 140 KR42355164 141 3419A00108 01224 141 KR42355178 142 3424A04959 01303 142 2424179549 00128 143 F8459THM5030 00683 144 5113640 144 MY52602279 145 3420A00697 01212 145 FC4201EX2Q4 01348 147 5036337 147 KR42355005 148 3424A05846 01302 148 SG55B130KF 150 F1045KXOC53 00868 151 5494918 151 11/17/98 COMMENTS RENEE TOBIN 129 RENEE TOBIN 131 LIBRARY CHILD. ClRCUL. 131 SURPLUS 2 133 PERSONNEL 134 PERSONNEL MIS COMPUTER ROOM PLANNING PLANNING PAGE 7 HARDWARE DESCRII:'TION 216 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 217 HP VECTRA CPU 218 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 219 HP VECTRA CPU 220 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 221 HP VECTRA CPU 222 COMPAQ 386 CPU 223 COMPAQ KEYBOARD 224 COMPAQ MONITOR 225 AMADEX DP96258 226 AMDEK MONITOR 227 APPLE COLOR MONITOR 228 APPLE COLOR MONITOR 229 APPLE COLOR MONITOR 230 APPLE COLOR MONITOR APPLE COLOR RGB 231 MONITOR APPLE EXTENDED 232 KEYBOARD 233 APPLE IMAGE WRITER II 234 APPLE IMAGEWRITER 235 APPLE LASER IIG 236 APPLE LASER PRINTER 237 APPLE MAC II 238 APPLE MAC MONITOR 239 APPLE MACINTOSH II APPLE MACINTOSH 240 KEYBOARD APPLE MACINTOSH 241 KEYBOARD APPLE MACINTOSH 242 KEYBOARD APPLE MACINTOSH 244 MONITOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. KR33813084 3424A04932 01280 KR42355004 3424A05033 01292 KR42354840 3424A04858 01325 4026HAN10618 00851 21808 23042601 C757 U03039 00305 87622837 SURPLUS 2 5012673 SURPLUS 2 5040525 SURPLUS 2 5049290 SURPLUS 2 5236002 SURPLUS 2 7044282 219087 SURPLUS 2 TF0441Q 1%C0090LLA 472399 SURPLUS 1 CA1123GV%M6000 FA00848 SURPLUS 1 FA190BOM5030 00566 SURPLUS 2 5101715 SURPLUS 2 F8048S8 SURPLUS 2 AP0411HN SURPLUS 2 MA1132SF SURPLUS 2 N/A N/A SURPLUS 2 HT124XA8M0404 SURPLUS 2 BOX # ~52 152 ~§3 PAGE 8 11/17/98 COMMENTS HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 245 APPLE MACINTOSH SE 246 APPLE MACINTOSH SI 247 APPLE MACINTOSH SI 248 APPLE MONITOR 249 APPLE MONITOR 250 APPLE MONITOR 251 APPLE MONITOR 252 APPLE MONITOR 253 APPLE SCANNER 254 AST BRAVO 386 255 AST BRAVO 387 256 AST BRAVO 388 257 AST BRAVO 389 258 AST BRAVO 390 259 AST BRAVO 391 260 AST BRAVO 392 261 AST BRAVO 393 262 AST MONITOR 263 AST MONITOR 264 AST MONITOR 265 AST MONITOR 266 AST PC 267 AST VGA MONITOR 268 ATT MONITOR 269 ATT PC 270 BERNOULLI HARD DRIVE 271 CARD KEY CENTRONIC LASER 272 PRINTER 273 CLONE PC 274 CLONE PC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. F8494UM5010 SURPLUS 2 F114245MC53 SURPLUS 2 F11447WJC53 SURPLUS 2 5048317 5055844 SURPLUS 1 5101715 SURPLUS 1 5118845 SURPLUS 1 7044275 8470764 00657 SURPLUS 1 TWB3052248 SURPLUS 1 TWB3051914 SURPLUS 1 TWB3053533 SURPLUS 1 TWB3052269 SURPLUS 1 TWB3051570 SURPLUS 1 TWB3053484 SURPLUS 1 TWB3053577 SURPLUS 1 TWB3052238 SURPLUS 1 038441C2337 SURPLUS 1 0384U1C2075 SURPLUS 2 0384UIC2337 SURPLUS 2 0384ULC26149 SURPLUS 2 TWB352238 SURPLUS 2 0384U 1 C2330 0384U1C1866 SURPLUS 2 627280 SURPLUS 1 7710320046 SURPLUS 1 11-0530-05 SURPLUS 1 66208419 00135 SURPLUS 1 321024721 SURPLUS 2 N/A N/A SURPLUS 2 BOX # PAGE 9 11/17/98 COMMENTS HARDWAR~ DESCRIPTION m 275 CLONE PC 276 COMPAQ 3 PORTABLE 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 3O2 303 3O4 305 COMPAQ 3 PORTABLE COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 386 CPU COMPAQ 38620E COMPAQ CPU COMPAQ CPU COMPAQ DESKPRO 386 COMPAQ FLOPPY DRIVE COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ MONITOR COMPAQ PROLINEA DEST SCANNER 1000 DIGITAL MONITOR DYNA FILE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER 1726AL2B0040 1730AL2B1017 4034HT8H1713 4034HT8H2321 4034 HT8H2513 4034HT8H2549 403HAN20182 4844HS4H0285 4929HT2H0189 4036HS8H0173 4032HAN201189 4041 HS8H0020 4034HT8H2519 1038AAK10149 37145440623 37145440629 02814544N374 02814544N391 02814544N594 02829816M903 14714544M1457 23042601 C787 4034HT8 H 1394 4202HBR10716 82114544B530 94514544E924 A339HER31375 8A72505567 TA635D3454 DF16533 F/A # LOC. 00101 SURPLUS2 00497 SURPLUS 2 00492 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 00869 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 00856 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 00838 SURPLUS 2 21809 157 00837 158 00864 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 21311 157 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 158 01153 SURPLUS 2 00626 SURPLUS 1 00746 SURPLUS 2 BOX # PAGE 10 11/17/98 COMMENTS HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 306 DYNAFILE 360K 307 EPSON FX100 PRINTER 308 EPSON LQ 2550 PRINTER 309 EPSON PRINTER 310 EPSON PRINTER 311 HP 1280 17" MONITOR 312 HP 7475A PLOTTER 402 HP DESKJET 520 313 HP DESKJET 660 314 PRINTER/FEEDER 315 HP ERGO 316 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 317 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 318 HP ERGO 1024 MONITOR 319 HP ERGO MONITOR 320 HP ERGO MONITOR 321 HP ERGO MONITOR 322 HP LASER III D 323 HP LASER JET lid 324 HP LASER JET IV PLUS 325 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU 326 HP PENTIUM 586 CPU 327 HP PLOTTER 328 HP VECTRA 486 329 HP VECTRA 486 330 HP VECTRA 486 331 HP VECTRA 486 332 HP VECTRA 486 333 HP VECTRA 486 334 HP VECTRA 486 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. DF04828 00571 SURPLUS 1 545534 00133 SURPLUS 2 00F0007200 F00669 SURPLUS 2 4011237 00266 SURPLUS 1 11015308 00517 SURPLUS 1 JP41512933 SURPLUS 2 2807V85916 00687 US45Q1502F SURPLUS 1 BOX # SG55A130BG MY4952M031 KR42051500 KR42051519 KR42355150 KR53964277 3490O 176 KR41037061 KR60190711 3022J165228 2934H19021 JPFF014118 3415500589 3415500667 2517A23463 3419A00036 3419A00340 3419A00341 3424A04743 3424A04841 3424A04993 3424A05005 00846 00825 012O0 01203 01327 01236 O1237 OO118 01264 01309 01304 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 160 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS I SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 PAGE 11 11/17/98 COMMENTS 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 401 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION HP VECTRA 486 HP VECTRA 486 HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU HP VECTRA 486 CPU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. 3424A05604 01301 SURPLUS 2 3425A05748 01238 SURPLUS 2 3419A00351 01227 3419A00354 01326 3419A00364 01206 SURPLUS 1 3419A01134 01235 SURPLUS 1 3420A00463 01234 3424A04861 01305 3424A04868 01299 3424A04870 01306 3424A04934 01262 3424A04995 01313 3424A05616 000121 3424A05617 000141 SURPLUS 1 3424A05827 01245 3424A05876 01240 3424A06060 01263 3434A04611 01361 3424A05853 01246 SURPLUS 1 353 HP VECTRA PENTIUM US71705764 01662 SURPLUS 2 354 HP VECTRA PENTIUM US72707381 01657 SURPLUS 2 355 HP VECTRA PENTIUM 586 3415S00672 01202 SURPLUS 1 356 IBM PC 51621066654 SURPLUS 1 357 IBM XT 3026621 SURPLUS 2 358 IBM XT 5.1621E+11 SURPLUS 2 359 IRWIN DISK DRIVE 0001149BX-01 00510 SURPLUS 1 360 LEAR MONITOR 9003 361 LINE MISER 00173 SURPLUS 1 362 MAC II F47466L5 00538 SURPLUS 2 363 MAC II F820087 SURPLUS 2 BOX # 11/17/98 COMMENTS PAGE 12 HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 364 MAC II Cl 365 MAC PORTRAIT DISP. 366 MACINTOSH CPU 367 MACINTOSH II 368 MACINTOSH II 369 MACINTOSH II Cl 370 MCG MONITOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER F/A # LOC. F11521C8724 F114241TC53 01128 F11517E0724 SURPLUS 1 F8190BOM5030 00566 SURPLUS 1 F849UVM5030 00681 SURPLUS 1 F1141FWM724 SURPLUS 1 HYCB300894 SURPLUS 2 BOX # 1/17/98 COMMENTS 371 MGC MONITOR H1CB300894 159 372 MTI PC 373 CASH/PRINTER 374 CASH/PRINTER 375 NEC MONITOR 002-0020893730 02-0020893730 71D08803C O0100 00773 00773 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 376 NEC MONITOR 377 NEC SPINWRITER 378 PRINTER 379 OKIDATA PRINTER 380 ONYX C5000 381 PANASONIC KX-P1123 382 PANASYNC MONITOR 383 POLAROID PALLET PLUS 74D08562W 5420617781 5420617781 185258 12906 2BMDL53527 KH2141488 WM7218C OO473 00221 00221 00118 00304 SURPLUS SURPLUS SURPLUS SURPLUS SURPLUS SURPLUS SURPLUS 384 POWER BOOK LaPtOP 385 POWER BOOK MONITOR 386 MONITOR SFC409NOL23L CY4024Y9132 R335GAKPO 00036 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 1 POLICE 387 SAMSUNG MONITOR 283900373 SURPLUS 2 388 TEKTRONICS PRINTER 389 PRINTER 390 PRINTER 391 TOSHIBA PRINTER J025028 ZA19912 ZA46257 ZA12702 0O183 00618 SURPLUS 1 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 2 SURPLUS 1 PAGE 13 ¥/ HARDWARE DESCRIPTION 392 TOSHIBA PRINTER 393 TOSHIBA PRINTER 394 TOSHIBA PRINTER 395 TOSHIBA PRINTER 396 TOSHIBA PRINTER 397 TOSHIBA PRINTER 398 MODEM 399 UPS SYSTEM 400 WANG TERMINAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SURPLUSED HARDWARE PREPARED BY: INFORMATION SYSTEM DEPT. SERIAL NUMBER 'F/A # LOC. ZA13978 00469 SURPLUS 1 ZA43516 SURPLUS 1 ZA46002 SURPLUS 1 ZA46244 SURPLUS 1 ZA46249 00696 SURPLUS 1 ZA46250 SURPLUS 1 66036608 SURPLUS 2 23828 SURPLUS 1 6334 SURPLUS 1 BOX # 11/17/98 COMMENTS PAGE 14 ¥2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Approval to Appropriate $27~000 From the Data Processing Replacement Reserve to Fund the Library's LAN Network Project Recommendation: Recommend the appropriation in the amount of $27,000 from the data processing replacement reserve to fund the Library's LAN network project. Backeround: Currently, the City's Library is connected to City Hall's wide area network (WAN). The recommendation is to create the Library's own local area network (LAN). This move will reduce and minimize the Library's down time, will stabilize the Library's on-site file and print services, up grade the Library's CD ROM peer to peer network, increase storage and functionality and add a "new service" for youth which will add four (4) CD ROM terminals to the Library's network to form a Back to Basics Learning Center on the second floor of the Library. The Library received $8,000 in State grant funds for this project and those funds will be applied to the project. The remaining balance is funded through the City's data processing replacement reserve. This reserve is designed to augment and supplement the funding of computer programs and improve future technological capabilities for City services. Also, funding through the reserve will allow existing Library funds to be used for the annual purchase of more books and periodicals for the Library. R~llly ~~ Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170, LOCATED ON THF_, EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN NORTH OF WILSON, SUBMITTED BY HILLSIDE COVE ASSOCIATES, LLC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15170, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map ! 5170 located on the east side of Heilman Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue in the Very Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1998 for the division of 2.52 acres into 3 parcels. The Developer, Hillside Cove Associates, LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the offsite improvements in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $55,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 27,500.00 CITY COUNCIl, STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 15170 - HILLSIDE COVE ASSOCIATES, LLC December 16, 1998 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: dlw Attachments KESOLUTION NO. ? ~- ~[~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15170, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15170, submitted by Hillside Cove Associates, LLC, and consisting of 3 parcels located on the east side of Hellman north of Wilson Avenue, being a division of 2.52 acres was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on July 22, 1998, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15170 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Hillside Cove Associates, LLC as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15170 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. q g~- ~ o~ 0 A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STKEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRiCT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15170 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. I, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFOKE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION i: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. /-/7 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ORIGINAL POOR QUALITY CITY OF ITEM: Parcel Map 15170 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXmBrr: "A" ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 15170 STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L SI --- S2 4 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L LANDSCAPING: Dist. LI Community Equestrian Trail D.G.S.F. Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. ...... 16 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel DU S1 S2 L1 1 1 I Annexation Date: December i 6, 1998 Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766, LOCATED ON BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800' WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, SUBMITTED BY R.C. APARTMENTS L.L.C, A DEVELOPER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number 15766, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 15766, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, in the Victoria Community Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 8, 1997, for the condominium subdivision of ! lot for 264 units on 22.2 acres of land. The Developer, R. C. Apartments, L.L.C. is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $851,809.00 $425,904.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City C!erk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. ~esp. ectil ~~ilte~/~7 City Engineer WJO:DJ:dlw VICINITY NIAI' v~ eros,/ TItACT 15766 CITY O1,' RAINClIO CUCAMOIN(;A COUNTY OF 8AN BEItNARDINO 5'i'A'1'1¢ O1,' CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. ~>- 6~d/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15766 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, submitted by R.C. Apartments, L.L.C., and consisting of 264 units located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, being a condominium subdivision of 1 lot for 264 units on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential District was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 8, 1997, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15766 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by R. C. Apartment L.L.C. as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15766 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ -~:;~,fi~fi, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15766 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation v~thout notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT "A* ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7-- STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND .5 ORIGINAL POOR QUALITY , ~," I~ ","' 'I" 'i" ""'" "'," II' ,.' TnACT 13013 MO 227/15-10 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: TRACT MAP NO. 15766 STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L S1 9 S3 3 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22,000L 27.500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L2 Turf Non-Tuff S.F. S.F. --- 6510 Trees Ea. 19 Decorative Hardscape SF 7950 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District DU S 1 S3 L2 264 264 264 264 Annexation Date: City Council Date December 9, 1998 Form Date 11 / 16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2, LOCATED ON VICTORIA PARK LANE, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED B WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek boulevard relating to Tract 14534-2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14534-2, located on the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the City Council on May 21, 1997. The Developer, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation, had submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek Boulevard relating to Tract 14534-2 in the following amount: Faithful Performance- Irrevocable Letter of Credit $474,073.90 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 14534-2 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC. December 16, 1998 Page 2 The submittal of said Agreement and Security will allow the Developer to extend the original requirement date of installation prior to January 1999. The anticipating installation will start by February 1999 and expected to be completed within three months from start of construction. Copies of the Agreement and Security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN SYSTEM RELATING TO TRACT 14534-2 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14534-2, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation, located at the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, was approved by the City Council on May 21, 1997, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, the Developer, William Lyon Homes, submits for approval an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security for the installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain System in Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Channel easterly to Day Creek Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N FROM: BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REI'ORT December 16. 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack l,am, AICI'. ('it,',' Manager ORIGINAL %Villiam J. ()'Nell, City Engineer POOR QUALITY Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector/~,/~ RI;JECT ALl. IllDS I:OR TIlE RANClIO CIJC,;\NI()N(i..\ CIVIC CENTI:.R CANOPY ADI)ITION PROJECT BI',.CAIE,;t! '1'111,'. BIDS SIIII.'qTANTI.,\I.I.Y EXCEED TItE F]NGINt.~ER'S ESTIMATI~ !,IECOMM ENI)ATION: It is rcctm'm~.cndcd that the City Cot,nell reject all bids lbr the Rancho Cucamcmga Civic Center Canopy Addition lh-ojcct because the bids substantially exceed the I')~ginccr's estimate BACI~.(; R() UN I)/ANA !,Y,%IS: l'cr previous Council action. bids wcrc solicited, received and opened on l)cccmhcr 8, 1998, lbr the subject project. [Jnity Construction is the apparent 1oxvcst bidder, with a bid [1111Ol. 111t ol $68, )(~8.0(). The I:ng~nccr s estimate was $_7,800.00. Respect t'ully sublllittcd. William .I. O'Neil City Engineer W,IO:MI)I,:Is DATE: December 16, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer (.~ Laura J. Bonaccorsi, Associate Park PlanheretiC/ SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION FOR THE HAVEN AVE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND CHURCH STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 21- 4647-9709. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Haven Avenue Bcautification Project between Base Line Road and Church Street, to Golden Bear Arborists, Incorporated, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9709. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on December 8, 1998, for the subject project. Golden Bear Arborists, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest bidder, with a bid amount of $177,821.40 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $185,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MDL:Is Attachment Bid Summary for Landscaping of the west side of Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road B~ds opened on Tuesday, December 8, 1998 ~ 2:00 PM Golden Bear Arborists Unit Item Description Qty Unit Price Price I Clearing & Grubbing I LS 52,800.00 $2,800.00 2 Unclassfied Excavation 490 CY $25,50 $12,495.00 3 Install 4" / 5" Pots 4792 EA $I 70 $8. 146.40 4 Automahc Imgation 1 LS $66,250.00 $66,250.00 5 Mulch 475 CY $21.00 $9,975.00 6 Soils Preparation/Fine Grading 38410 SF $0.12 $4,609 20 7 Maintenance Period ! 20 Days $33.50 $4,020.00 8 1 Gallon Shrub I 172 EA $4.75 $5,567,00 9 5 Gallon Shrub 862 EA $17.00 $14,654.00 10 15 Gallon Tree 80 EA $75.00 $6,000.00 11 PCC Mow Strip 2830 LF $12.00 $33,96000 12 Boulders - 24" 126 EA $30.00 $3,780.00 13 Boulders - 36" G0 EA $6300 $3,78Q00 14 Trash Receptacle 2 EA $892.40 $1,784 80 TOTAL AMOUNT BID $177,821.40 Nature Tech LandscapJng Unit Price Price $ I 00 $1.00 $26.00 $12,740.00 $100 $4.792.00 $100.64800 $100,648 00 $20.00 $9,500.00 $0.10 $3,841.00 $2500 $3,000.00 $5 00 $5,86Q00 $12.00 $10.344.00 $7500 $6,00Q~JO $6.00 $16,98000 $4500 $5.670 DO $7000 $4,200 (~0 $500.00 $1,000 o0 $184,576.00 S & M Landscape Unit Item Description Qty Unit Price Price 1 Clearing & Grubbing 1 LS St,000.00 $1.000.00 2 Unclassfied Excavation 490 CY $50.00 $24,500 00 3 Install 4" / 5" Pots 4792 EA $3.00 $14.376.00 4 Automatic Irrigation 1 LS $76,537.00 $76,537.00 5 Mulch 475 CY $30.00 $14.25000 6 Soils Preparation/Free Grading 38410 SF $0.30 $11,523,00 7 Maintenance Period 120 Days $27.00 $3,240.00 8 I Gallon Shrub 1172 EA $5 00 $5.860 00 9 5 Gallon Shrub 862 EA $13.00 $1 t,20G 00 I0 15 Gallon Tree 80 EA $150.00 $12,000 00 11 P C C. Mow Str~p 2830 LF $700 $19,810 00 12 Boulders - 24" 120 EA $25.00 $3,150 O0 13 Boulders - 36" 60 EA $50.00 $3.000 00 14 Trash Receptacle 2 EA $700.00 $1,400 00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID $201,852.00 Mariposa Horticultural Unit Price Price $2,624.00 $2,624,00 $60.61 $29,698.90 $204 $9.77568 $93,100.00 $93,100.00 $31 00 $14,725.00 $0.27 $10,370.70 $6 25 $75000 $8 00 $9.376.00 $t9 00 $16,378.00 $80 00 $6.400.00 $9 68 $27,394,40 S3787 $4.77162 $40 00 $2,40000 $67500 $1,35000 $229,114.30 DATE: TO: CITY ()l" RANCII() C[:CAM( STAFF REPORT December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members o1' the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FR. OM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Enginccr Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works lnspcctor/2'~/-f'~ ACCEPT THE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT No. 98-008, AS COMPLETE, REkI:ASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE Tt[E CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $157,761.95 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, Contract No. 98-008, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and r~tain the Faithful Performance in the anlount of$154,226.75 to bc used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of{he Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of$154,226.75, six months after the recordation of said Notice if no claims have bccn received. Also, authorixc the release of the retention in the amount o1'$15,776.19, thirty-live days after the apprt)val of the final contract amount ors i 57,761.95. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been complctcd in accordance with the appmvcd plans and specifications and to the satisthction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $157,761.95, which includes onc contract changc order in the amount of $2,300.00 for the removal and replacement o foyer-saturated subgrade under a proposed block wall.. The original amount approved by Council was $169,64{).42 City Engineer WJO:MDL:Is Attachment J No. ox 0t A RESOLUTION OFTlIE CITY COUNCIL OFTfIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCF~P'FING THE PUBLIC IMI~'ROVEMENTS FOR TI-tE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT EX PANS ION I'ROJ ECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-008 AN D AUTHORIZING THE FILING ()F A NOTICE OF' COMH.,ETION FOR'FIIE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements tbr the Senior Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, Contract No. 98-008 has bccn completed to the satislhction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filccl, ccrti13, ing the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the Courtty R. ecorder o£ San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: CI'I'Y ()F RANCII() ('1 STAFF REPOI/T December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council .Jack Lain, AICP. City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil. City Engineer Michael D. Long. Supervising Pt, blic Works Inspector f~'04-" SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT TIIE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE, CONTICACT NO. 98-022, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE 'FILE BONDS AND AUTIIORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPI. ETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $119373.00 lIECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that tile City Cotmcil accept tile Traffic Signal and Satiety Lighting at tile intersection of Arrow Route and Red Oak Avcnt,e. Contract No. 98-022. as complete. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. and retain the Faithlid Perlbrmancc in tile amot, nt of $.108.585.00 to bc used as the Maintenance Bond and at, thorizc the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in tile arnou,~t o1'$108.585.00 six months after the rccordati{m of said Notice if no claims have been received. Also. authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $5,968.65. thirty-five days nficr the approval of tile 1inal contract amount ofS119.373.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been complctcd in accordancc with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The 1inal coutract amount. based on pro. jcct documentation, is $119.373.00. which includes three contract change orders in tile amot, nt of $ I 0.788.00 tbr the constrt,ction oFa signal ir~tercomleCt with the White Oak/Arrow signal. mast arm brackets and the reconstruction of a handicap ramp. The original wnount approvcd by Cottaell was $I 19.373.00. City Engineer W.IO:MDL:Is Attachrncnt RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-022 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Traffic Signal Lighting at the Intersection o fArrow Route and Red Oak Avenue, Contract No. 98-022 has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector?'?'~_ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE TAPIA VIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $195,194.41 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the Tapia Via street improvements, from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice o'f Completion, and retain the Faithful Performance in the amount of $178,100.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $178,100.00 six months after the recordation ofsaid Notice if no claims have been received. Also, authorize the release of the retention in the amount ors 19,519.44, thirty-five days after the approval of the final contract amount of $195,194.41. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $195,194.41, which includes one contract change order in the amount of $10,482.91 for the reconstruction of sewer manholes and right-of-way delay by the Gas Company. The original amount approved by Council was $196,750.00. Respectfully submitted, Wi 11~J. O~Nei~lc/~7 City Engineer WJO:MDL:Is Attachment sot vto ??- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TAPIA VIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM GROVE AVENUE TO RANCHERIA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 98-012 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Tapia Via Street Improvements, from Grove Avenue to Rancheria Street, Contract No. 98-012, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: '1'(): I?ROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 16. 1998 Cit'V ()l: R,.\NCI l() ('1 '('.\TXl()Nt STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Litill. AICI'. City Manager William J. ()'Ncil. City Engineer Micllacl D. Long. St, pervising Public ORIGINAL wl?,, sg, R QUALITY nspector ACCEPT THE SPRUCE PARK SKATE PARK. CONTRACT NO. 98-032, AS COMPLETE. RELEASE TIlE BONDS AND AUTIIORIZE TIlE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COblI'I.FJI'ION AND AI'i'ROVE TIlE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $120,079.80 RECOMMENI)ATION: 14. is recommended that City Council accopt the Spruce Park Skate l'ark. Contract No. 984)32. as complete. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. and retain the Faithlhl Pcrlbrmancc in the amount o f S112.957.00 to bc used as the Maintenance llond and authorize the release of the I.abor and Materials l)ond in the amount of 5112.957.00. six months after the recordation of said Notice if no claims have bccn received. Also. authorize the release of the retention in the amount orS12.079.80. thirty-five clays after the approval of the fired contract amount of $120.079.80. BACKGROUN!)/ANALYSIS: 'File subject project has been completed in accordancc with tile approved plans and spccilicatio,ls and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Tile final contract amount. based on project documcr~tation. is $120.079.80. which includes contract change order in thc amount of $7,040.00 for the nlodification of the pyramid and the addition of drainage lines. The original anlount approved by Cotmcil was $124.253.00. R 71s ~,t.~)' submittcd. - Ncil City Engineer W.IO:MDL:Is Attachment RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calilbrnia 91729 WHEN RECORDED lVIAII, TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF IL~NCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho (._'ucalllOllg;.I, Calitbrnia 91729 NOTICt'~ OF COMI'I,E'I'I()N NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TIIAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hcrcinalicr described rcal property, the nature of which interest or estate is: All public rights-olLway- within the boundaries of CO 984132 2. The lidl name and address of' the undersigned oxvncr is: CITY ()F RANClIO CUCAMONGA, 10500 Civic Center l)rivc, P.O. Box 807, Rancho ('tlCalllOllga Calitbrnia 91729. 3. ()n the 16'h day of[)cccmbcr, 1998, there was completed on the hcrcinalicrdcscribcd real property the work of improvement set lbrth in the contract documents lbr: Spruce l'ark Skate l'ark 4. The name of the original contractor tbr the work of improvement as a whole was: Nature Tcch Landscaping 5. The real property relkrred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucanlonga, County of San Bernardino, Calilbmia, and is described as tbllows: Spruce ['ark Skate Park CITY ()F RANCII() CI~('AM()NGA, a Municipal Corpt)ration. ( )kx'llcr William.l. ()Nell ~ C. ity Engineer 7O A RF~SOI,t.ITION OF TI IE CITY COt IN(_'II. ()1:'1'1 I1.i ('ITY ()F RANCII() CUCANION(iA, CAI.IF()RNIA. ACCt';I'TIN(i TIll:, I'[JI/1,1C IMI'IU)VI':MI';N'I'S I:()R TI I1'; SI'R. UCt! I'ARK SKA'I'Ii PARK, C()NTI~.A£"I' ANI) AI~TII()RIZIN(i Till! FII,IN(i ()1: A N()'I'ICE ()1: COMI'I.t.;'I'I(IN I:()R. TI IF, WORK WI I!7. REAS, the construction of public improvoncnts for the Spruce I'ark Skate Park, Contract No. 98-032 has been completed to the satisfaction of the ('it,.' I!nginccr: and WI IEREAS. a Notice ol'Coml~lction is required tt)bc 1~ led. ccrti I}.'ing the work complete. NOW, TtlEI,'.EFOI~.IL the ('it>' C. ouncil of the ('it',' of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hcrcbx aCCCl')tcd and the ('it.',' l:~nginccr is authorized it) sign and lilt a Notice of Completion with the County [?,ccordcr of Sail l)crmtrdino Countx.'. 7/ DATE: '1'(): FRO M: BY: SUBJECT: CI'['V ()F R:\NCII() STAFF REPORT December 16. 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, ,,\ICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer l~inda R. Beck, .It'. Engineer ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFIlL PERFORMANCE BOND, AND FII...F: A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMI'ROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL ;'VIAl' 15074. LOCATED ON THE NOR. T[ I SIDE OF LA VINE STRF. ET 230 FEET EAST ()F HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MR. DENNING M. PERDEW, EXECUTOR FOR TIlE ESTATE OF JOIIN L PERDEW RECOM MEN DATION: '['bc required improvements Ibr l'arcel Map 15074, have been completed in an acceptable manner, m~d it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithfid Pcrlbrnmncc Bond. IIACKG!I. OUND/ANA!~YSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15074, on the north side ofl,a Vine Street. 230 l;,:¢t cast of [Iclhnan Avenue. the applicant was required to complete street improvements. It is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Pcrlbrmancc [~,ond. Developer: Mr. Denning M.. Perdew, Executor fbr the Estate of John L. Perdew 2595 Montgomery Avenue Cardiff by the Sea. CA 92007 Release: Faithful Pcrlbrmance Bond: Investment CD $8,000.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. ()'Ncil City l:,nginccr W.I():I,RB:Is A RI.~SO[.UTION OF THE CITY ()F R:\NCIIO CUCAMONGA, CAI,IFORNIA, ACCEP'I'IN(; 'l'llli PUB[,IC IN'lI'R()VIiMIiNTS [:OR PAI~.(?l![~ MAP 15074, AND AtJTII()RIZIN(i TIlE FILING OF A N()TI('I'; ()F COMI'I,Ii'I'I()N FOR Tt IF, WORK WHER. I!AS. the construction of public improvements lbr Parcel Map 15074 have bccn completed to the satisthction of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS. a Notice of Completion is rcqt, ircd to bc filed. ccrtitying the work complete. NOW TH I~RI".FORE. be it resolvcd. that the work is hereby acccptcd and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice oi' Completion with the Cot, nty Recorder of San Bernardino County. 73 ORDINANCE NO. 592 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 17 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 0227-091-18 THROUGH 21. A. RECITALS. 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency filed an application forVictoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 28, and continued to November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) and Civic/Community to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). 4. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application to the City Council. 5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-04 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Civic/Community to Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). 6. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Ordinance 592 Page 2 B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to four parcels of land totaling approximately 17 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and which is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facility; and b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned Community. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a fire station. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant and partially developed with a public storage facility. The property to the south, on the south side of Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element and the Victoria Community Plan; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: Ordinance 592 Page 3 a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and ¢. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98- 03 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ordinance 592 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN E D: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of December, 1998, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of December, 1998. Executed this 17th day of December, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ?7 ORDINANCE NO. 593 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOR 21/2 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-091-22, 25, AND 43 A. RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue. 3. On November 10, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the application to the City Council. 4. On December 2, 1998 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment No. 98-05 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue. 5. On December 2, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Ordinance 593 Page 2 B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on December 2, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 6 acres and one 2½ acre parcel, all of which are basically rectilinear in configuration. The first two parcels (6 acres) are located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,100 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and are presently developed with a fire station and the third parcel (2½ acres) is located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and is vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and b. All of the surrounding properties are within the Victoria Planned Community. For the parcel 1,100 feet east of Rochester Avenue, the properties to the north are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to the west is designated Utility Corridor and is developed with electrical transmission lines and flood control channels. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on the south side of Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant. For the parcel 2,000 feet east of Rochester Avenue, the properties to the north are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant with an unused railroad right-of-way. The property to the west is currently designated Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) and is being changed to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with the approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-03 and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. The property to the south, on the south side of Base Line Road, is designated Regionally Related Commercial and is vacant; and Ordinance 593 Page 3 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element and the Victoria Community Plan; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area by a General Plan Master Plan designation with adjacent properties; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and ¢. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife Ordinance 593 Page 4 resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98- 04 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN E D: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of December, 1998, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of December, 1998. Executed this 17th day of December, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ¢/ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS The City of Rancho Cucamonga takes various actions in the review of development applications. The activities include subdivision review, review of grading plans, design review, issuance of permits, and the granting of time extensions for project approvals. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, these actions are divided into two categories: ministerial and discretionary. CEQA environmental review requirements apply to discretionary projects approved by the City (e.g., approval of subdivision map), but do not apply to ministerial projects (e.g., issuance of a building permit). The purpose of these amendments is to bring City codes into compliance with State law and to clarify that certain actions are ministerial activities. These amendments were brought before the Planning Commission in July 1998 and the attached Planning Commission staff report describes the proposed changes in detail. The Planning Commission adopted resolutions recommending approval of the proposed ordinances. SUBDIVISIONS The State Subdivision Map Act allows for an initial approval period for subdivisions of up to three years, plus up to five years of extensions, for a total of eight years before the final map must be recorded. The City's Subdivision Ordinance is more restrictive and provides for a initial two-year approval, subject to up to three years of extensions, for a maximum life of five years. During California's recession in the first half of the 1990s, the state legislature granted three years of automatic time extensions, above and beyond whatever time extensions cities may grant. For those projects which received such an automatic time extension from the state, the maximum life is eight years (five years of City approvals with extensions, plus three years of state extensions) under our current regulations. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 2 One such project, Tentative Tract 14875, has exhausted all possible time extensions and will expire on January 9, 1999. The applicant has not submitted for plan check; hence, cannot record their final map before it expires. The applicant has requested that the City consider amending our regulations to allow time periods up to eight years, which is the maximum time period authorized by state law. This request was brought to the Planning Commission on Wednesday, December 9, and it was the consensus of the Commission that the maximum time limit should remain at five years, as previously recommended by the Commission. The Commission was concerned that if an eight year time period were approved, coupled with the three years of automatic time extensions by the state, this would extend the maximum time period to eleven years for not only Tract 14875 but possibly others. They felt eleven years was too long. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The proposed amendments are not a "project;" hence, are exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No correspondence has been received regarding this item. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 22, 1998 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated July 22, 1998 Ordinance Approving Amendment to the Grading Ordinance Ordinance Approving Amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment 98-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 22, 1998 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga takes various actions in the review of development applications. The activities include subdivision review, review of grading plans, design review, issuance of permits, and the granting of time extensions for project approvals. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, these actions are divided into two categories: ministerial and discretionary. CEQA environmental review requirements apply to discretionary projects approved by the City (e.g., approval of subdivision map), but do not apply to ministerial projects (e.g., issuance of a building permit). The purpose of these amendments is to clarify that certain actions are ministerial activities. ANALYSIS: Grading Ordinance: California courts in certain jurisdictions have reasoned that issuance of grading permits can be considered discretionary approval subject to CEQA. The current language in our Grading Ordinance could be interpreted that review of grading plans and issuance of grading permits was a discretionary act which triggers CEQA review at the grading stage because it allows for discretion to apply conditions. Obviously, this was not the intent when the Grading Ordinance was adopted. The attached amendment to the Grading Ordinance clarifies the intent that a normal grading application and the issuance of a grading permit does not involve discretion on the part of the City. The exception to this is the Hillside Grading Ordinance. There, the general grading guidelines and specific type of grading which will occur must be considered discretionary. Subdivision Map Extensions: Case law does not answer the question of whether there is due process right or fundamental property right in a person near a project to receive notice and the opportunity to be heard at a hearing for an extension of Subdivision Maps. The Map Act does not specify a hearing for extensions of Tentative Maps. The City Attorney has advised staff that a public hearing process should be required for a time extension. The City's Subdivision Ordinance currently gives the City Planner authority to grant time extensions of Tentative Maps. Currently, Tentative Maps are approved for an initial two- year period, subject to extensions in 12-month increments upon request. of the applicant. To be consistent with the Map Act, it is recommended that the Subdivision Ordinance be amended to provide for a three-year approval period with time extensions up to two years consistent with the Map Act. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GRADING REVIEW & TIME EXTENSIONS July 22, 1998 Page 2 Conditional Use Permits, Development Reviews, Variances and Minor Exceptions: Currently, the City grants approval for two years. Extensions may be granted by the city Planner, without a public hearing, in 12-month increments for up to five years from the original approval date. It is recommended that the Development Code be amended to provide for a five-year approval period without time extensions. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed amendments are exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Grading Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Development Code Amendment. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC:Is Attachments: Resolution Recommending Approval of Grading Ordinance Amendment Resolution Recomending Approval of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment PUBLIC HEARINGS B. CONSIDERATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING GRADING REVIEW AND TIME EXTENSIONS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. There was no testimony and Chairman Barker closed the hearing. Commissioner McNiel asked if the purpose of the amendment was to bring the Code into compliance with State law. Mr. Coleman confirmed that was correct. Motion: Moved by Bethel, seconded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Code Amendments regarding grading review and time extensions. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15926 o CARNEY - A residential subdivision of 5 single family lots on 1.33 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge_ Lane - APN: 202-041-67. Cecilia Gallardo, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Michael Ross, 6850 Pepperidge Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he owns the property adjacent to. Lot 1. He expressed concern that the design be in keeping with the rest of the houses in the area. He questioned the height of the wall adjacent to his property and the size of the houses in relation to the existing homes. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, that the average lot size is 11,380 square feet. He said the houses will be developed on an individual basis and should be consistent with the surrounding houses. Chairman Barker stated that the houses will be reviewed by either staff or the Planning Commission. Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated that staff would review the plans if they are submitted individually. He stated that it is asked that the houses be compatible with the neighborhood but that is a very subjective matter. Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 22, 1998 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. A. Recitals. 1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-44, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: Section 15.12.220 Appendix Section 7006 -- Plans and specifications subsections (d) and (e) are hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: (d) Soils Engineering Report. The soils engineering report required by subsection (c) shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures and design criteria for corrective measures including buttress fills, when necessary, and opinions and recommendations covering adequacy for the intended use of sites to be developed by the proposed grading as affected by soils engineering factors, including the stability of slopes. Recommendations included in the soils engineering report ~ approvod by thc building official shall be incorporated into the grading plan or specifications. (e) Engineering Geology Report. The engineering geology report required by Subsection (a) shall include an adequate description of the geology of the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. GRADING ORD. AMEND. o CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 2 site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development, and opinions and recommendations covering the adequacy for the intended use of sites to be developed by the proposed grading as affected by geological factors. Recommendations included in the report and approvcd by thc building of"fieiel shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications. SECTION 4: Section 15.12.250 Appendix Section 7010 amended -- Fills subsections (a) and (e) are hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: Section 7010 (a) Fills. Unless otherwise recommended in the approved soils engineering report and approved by thc building official, fills shall conform to the provisions of this Section and to Figure A, Typical Lot Cross- section for Fills. EXCEPTION: The provisions of this section may be waived by the Building Official for minor fills not intended to support structures. (e) Compaction. All fills, including backfill in utility trenches, shall be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Fills exempted elsewhere in this ordinance and where the building official determines that compaction is not a necessary safety measure to aid in preventing saturation, settlement, slipping, or erosion of the fill. 2. Where lower density and expansive types of soil exist, permission for lesser compaction may be granted by the building official upon showing of good cause under the conditions provided herein. 3. Alternate methods of filling and compaction may be utilized on utility trenches or other specific projects when recommended by the soils engineer and approved by thc building official. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. ~'/-?,_D~' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF SUBDIVISION MAPS. A. Recitals. 1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly-noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Municipal Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-45, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: Section 16.16.160.A. is hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: 16.16.160 Expiration. A. The approval or conditional approval of a tentative subdivision map shall expire three years twcnty four months from the date of the adoption of the resolution by the planning commission approving or conditionally approving the map. An extension to the expiration date may be approved as provided in Section 16.16.17(X-B,). SECTION 4: Section 16.16.170 is hereby amended to read in words and figures, as follows: 16.16.170 Extensions. A. Request by Subdivider. The subdivideror his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative subdivision map by written application to the community development department. The application shall CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 2 be filed not less than sixty days before the map is to expire, and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension. D. City Planncr Action. Thc city planncr may 6xtcnd thc approval of a tcntativc tract map if hc finds that thorc has bccn no significant changcs in thc gcncral plan land usc otcmcnt, dcvclopmont codc or othcr applicablc spccific/oommunity plan, character of thc arca within which thc map is Iocatcd, or currcnt planning policy or past practicc that would causc thc approvod map to bocomc inconsistent or non conforming. Ifthc city planncr finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc city planncr shall rcfcr thc cxtcnsion rcqucst to thc planning commission for considcration. B. Planning Commission Action. All time extension requests shall be processed in the same manner as the original tentative subdivision map in accordance with Chapter 16.16. C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted for a period or periods not exceeding a total of-three two years. D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a tentative tract map, after conducting a public hearing, the city planncr or planning commission may impose new conditions or revise existing conditions on the approved tentative map as they find necessary. All public hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply. E. Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any action of the city planncr to thc planning commission, or any action oft-he planning commission to the city council, within fifteen days of such action in conformance to Section 16.16.130. F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the City's Master Fee Resolution. G. Findings. The granting of an extension shall require the planning commission to make all of the findings in accordance with Section 16.16.100. all of thc following findings to bc madc by thc approving 1. Thc previously approvcd tcntativc map is in sub'3tantiat compliancc with thc city's currcnt gcncral plan, 3pccific plans, ordinanec3, plans, codc3 and policics; 2. Thc cxtcnsion of thc tcntativc map will not cau3c significant inconsistcncic3 with thc currcnt gcncral plan, specific plans, ordinancc3, plans, codc3 and policic3; CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 3 3. Thc cxtension of the tcntativc map i3 not likcly to cause public hcalth and safcty problcms; 4. Thc cxtcnsion is within thc timc limits prc3cribcd by Statc law and local ordinancc. Unlcss all of thc abovc findings arc madc by thc approving body, thc rcqucstod cxtcnsion shall bc dcniod. SECTION 5: Section 16.20.090 is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: 16.20.090 Expiration. The approval or conditional approval of the tentative parcel map shall expire three years twcnty-four months from the date of adoption of the resolution by the planning commission approving or conditionally approving the map. The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map shall terminate all proceedings and no parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within such tentative parcel map shall be filed without first processing a new tentative parcel map. SECTION 6: Section 16.20.100 is hereby amended to read in words and figures, as follows: 16.20.100 Extensions. A. Request by Subdivider. The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development director. The application shall be filed not less than sixty days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension. B. City Enginoor Action. Thc city cnginccr may cxtcnd thc approval of a tcntativc parccl map if he finds that thcrc has boen no significant changc3 in thc gcncral plan land u'3c olorncnt, dcvclopmont codc or othor applicablc spocific/community plan, charactor of thc arca within which thc map is Iocatod, or current planning policy or past practicc that would causc thc approved map to bocainc inoormistent or non conforming. if thc city cnginocr finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc city cngineor shall rcfcr thc cxtcnsion rcqucst to thc planning commission for considcration. B. Planning Commission Action. All time extension requests shall be processed in the same manner as original tentative parcel map in accordance with Chapter 16.20. C. Time Limit of Extension. Extensions may be granted for a period or periods not exceeding a total of-t~nme two years. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION ORD. AMEND. - CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 4 D. Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a tentative parcel map, after conducting a public hearing, thecity c~ginecr or planning commission may impose new conditions or revise existing conditions on the approved tentative parcel map as they find necessary. All public hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply. E. Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any action of the city cnginocr to thc planning commission or any action of thc planning commission to the city council, within fifteen days of such action in conformance to Section 16.16.130. F. Fee. The fee for processing an extension shall be pursuant to the city's master fee resolution. G. Findings. The granting of an extension shall require the planning commission to make all of the findings in accordance with Section 16.20.060. SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of c(~mpetent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. ~______~ (~::~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS AND EXTENSIONS. A. Recitals. 1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 98-46, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On December 16, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B: Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: Section 17.02.100 hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: Section 17.02.100- Lapse of Approval and Extensions Lapse of Approvals. Approvals for development review, conditional use permits, variances, and minor dcvietions exceptions shall lapse and become void 2<1 months five years from the approval date, unless a different expiration date is specifically established as a condition of approval and unless one of the following actions occur: A building permit is issued in accordance with the approved entitlement and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or, CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 98-01 - CITY OF R.C. December 16, 1998 Page 2 2. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Extcnsions. An cxtcnsion may bc grantcd by thc City Planncr for lapsc of approval for projects dc3cribod in subsection A of this section. Extcnsions may bc grantcd in 12 month incrcmcnts and not to cxcced a total of ~1 ycars from thc original datc of approval, unlc3s othcrwisc provided for by statc law. All requcsts for cxtcnsions should bc filcd with thc City Planner at Icest 30 days prior to thc cxpiration datc. Thc City Planncr may cxtcnd thc approval of a project if hc finds that thcrc have bccn no significant changcs in thc Land Usc Elcmcnt, Dcvclopmcnt Codc, or othcr applicablc specific/community plan; charactcr of thc arce within which thc projcct is located; or currcnt planning policy or past prattitc that would causc thc approved project to bccomc inconsistcnt or non-conforming. Also, granting of an cxtcnsion should not bc dctrimcntal to thc safcty or wclfarc or matcrially injurious to propcrtic3 or improvcmcnts in thc vicinity. If thc City Ptanncr finds that thcrc is significant changc, thc City Planncr shall rcfcr thc cxtcnsion to thc Planning Commission for considcration. SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of c6mpetent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in theInland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Attached for your review is the current listing of the City Council's Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions. Staff has added the most current City Council Delegates for the General Plan and Central Park Subcommittees. The City Council may wish to discuss their current designations or have the designations remain as is. Re~ ectfull,y S#bmitted, Jack Lam, AICP City Manager Attachment: City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commission List CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS As Designated from December 16, 1998 City Council Meeting The following is a brief synopsis of each of the Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions. AB 939 SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE This is a state mandated task force created by San Bernardino County and is made up of the Board of Supervisors, elected representatives from each City within San Bernardino County and 10 non-elected representatives. The purpose of the task force is to coordinate the development of the County and City's Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and to coordinate a cost effective regional solid waste management system. Meets on a Quarterly Basis; the Third Thursday of Each Month from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Fisk Auditorium of the San Bernardino County Museum. DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Dutton AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) COMMITTEE Provides liaison with the South Coast Air Quality Management District regarding air quality issues. Meets as Needed at the AQMD Headquarters in Diamond Bar DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Biane BALDY VIEW PUBLIC PRIVATE COALITION (CLOUT) Provides a program of action for the public and private sectors of the Baldy View region on issues of area- wide importance. Meets the fourth Thursday of each month, 7:30 a.m., Ontario Marriott Hotel DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Williams CABLE TELEVISION SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the cable television franchises and to develop the public access portion of the franchise agreement. Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Curatalo and Biane CENTRAL PARK TASK FORCE Master Plan phasing priorities for Central Park. Meets as Needed at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Curatalo and Williams CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE Provides liaison between the Chamber of Commerce and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in coordinating projects and items of mutual interest. Meets Second Wednesday of Each Month at the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber office DELEGATE: Dutton ALTERNATE: Williams City Council, Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 16, 1998 Page 2 CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE The City Selection Committee is made up of all of the Mayors for San Bernardino County and its purpose is to select elected representatives to various bodies which include: Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and the Air Quality Management District. The regular meeting of the committee is held on the last working day of April of every even numbered year at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino in conjunction with SAN BAG agenda business starting at 9:30 a.m. Mayor is Representative COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE Monitors the activities of the Foundation and items of mutual interest. Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Dutton ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/FOOTHILL BLVD. TASK FORCE Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to discuss and recommend to Council a course of action for reassessment of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor from both a land use and economic development perspective. Meets as needed DELEGATES: Williams and Biane FIRE DISTRICT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Reviews employment eligibility lists prior to certification and other related personnel matters. Meets as Needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center in accordance with Fire Dep=~ment Rules and Regulations DELEGATES: Alexander and Biane GENERAL PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE To generate an Issues Report that will establish the scope of technical and policy matters that will be evaluated by the entire City Council and Planning Commission. Meets as needed DELEGATES: Biane & Dutton, Macias and Mannerino HISTORIC CULTURAL RESOURCE MITIGATION TASK FORCE Formulates standard procedures for mitigation of adverse impacts to identified cultural or historic resources. Meets as needed DELEGATE: Williams ALTERNATE: Alexander City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 16, 1998 Page 3 HOUSING SET ASIDE SUBCOMMITTEE Reviews affordable housing needs and develops strategy and programs for agency set-aside money. Meets first Tuesday of February at 8:30 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Biane and Alexander INLAND EMPIRE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES The Inland Empire League is one of fifteen divisions within the League of California Cities and functions as an "arm" of cities. The League also provides training, legislative tracking, and research for associate cities. Meets monthly and/or quarterly as needed; location changes each month DELEGATE: Biane ALTERNATE: Curatalo LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - ECONOMIC, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & SUBCOMMITTEE Reviews and discusses statewide policy and legislation affecting these topics. Meets quarterly on the 2nd Friday of the month; location changes DELEGATE: Biane HOUSING LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE Provides a liaison on library issues. Meets the first Tuesday of February at 9:00 a.m. and as needed at the Rancho Cucam_ onga Civic Center. DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander MOBILE HOME ACCORD REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the City's Mobile Home Accord and contract negotiations. The Accord is a contract between the owners of the City's mobile home parks and the City and addresses rent stabilization for the mobile home parks. Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:00 a.m. and as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander ALTERNATE: Biane MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT/SIGNAGE TASK FORCE Ad Hoc Task Force assigned to work with two members of the Planning Commission to review sign ordinance. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Curatalo and Alexander City Council, Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 16, 1998 Page 4 NORTH ETIWANDA PRESERVE Established by the City Council at their February 4, 1998 meeting. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Alexander OMNITRANS OMNITRANS is a Joint Powers Agreement which coordinates the busing needs of its associate cities. Meets the first Wednesday of each month at Omnitrans Headquarters in San Bernardino at 8:00 a.m. DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Williams ONTARIO CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY Established by the Redevelopment Agency at their January 21, 1998 meeting to review proposed activities. Meets as Needed Delegate: Biane ALTERNATE: Williams PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the construction of park and recreation facilities and items of mutual concern. Council determined that whole Council should review subject matter on an interim one year basis to determine future direction of Subcommittee. Meets first and third Wednesdays at 5:00 p.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Council Subcommittees for these Commissions conduct the interviews for the expired terms and vacancies as they occur and provide liaison for items of mutual interest. Park & Recreation Planning/HPC DELEGATES: Dutton and Williams DELEGATES: Alexander and Dutton PUBLIC SAFETY SUBCOMMITTEE Provides a liaison for public safety issues. Meets first Tuesday of February at 10:30 a.m. & as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo City Council Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as Designated from December 16, 1998 Page 5 PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for public works projects throughout the City. with this subcommittee.) (Law Enforcement Subcommittee combined Meets first Tuesday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Biane RAILS TO TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE Established by the City Council at their October 15, 1997 Meeting to review multi-use Community Trail along the Southern Pacific Rail (SPRR) Line. Meets as Needed DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams REDEVELOPMENT MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE Provides liaison for the marketing of the City and reviews agency marketing budget. Subcommittee combined with this subcommittee.) (Regional Mall Meets first Tuesday of February at 9:30 a.m. & as needed at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DELEGATES: Williams and Dutton ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Created August 3, 1994 in response to residents' desire for input into the Route 30 Corridor. Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Tri-Communities Conference Room. DELEGATES: Alexander and Williams ALTERNATE: Curatalo ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR DESIGN JPA Created January 19, 1994, to address Route 30 Corridor concerns for San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties. Meets the second Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m., meeting site rotates DELEGATES: Williams and Curatalo AL TERNATE: Alexander SANBAG SAN BAG is the regional planning authority of which the City participates in through a Joint Powers Agreement. Meets the first Wednesday of each month at the Norman Feldhym Library in San Bernardino at 9:30 a.m. DELEGATE: Alexander ALTERNATE: Williams City Council, Committees, Subcommittees and Commissions as designated from December 16, 1998 Page 6 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - REGIONAL COUNCIL SCAG is an association of County and City governments and is a Council of Governments (COG). The purpose of such councils is to provide a forum where members can reach agreement on issues of common concern and develop regional planning approaches. Meets 1st Thursday of each month, and Annual meeting held in March of each year; location changes (the last two years meetings were held in Brea) DELEGATE: Alexander AL TERNATE: Biane SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - SOLID WASTE SUBCOMMITTEE Discusses regional solid waste issues. Meets 1st Tuesday of the month; location changes. DELEGATE: Biane SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) - COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Discusses regional community and economic development policy. Meets 1st Thursday of each month; location changes. DELEGATE: Alexander COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS December 16, 1998 Alexander Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT) City Selection Committee Fire District Personnel Committee Historic Cultural Resource Mitigation Task Force Housing Set Aside Subcommittee Library Subcommittee Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee Multi-Family DevelopmentJSignage Task Fome North Etiwanda Preserve Omnitrans Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Planning/Historic Preservation Subcommittee Rails to Trails Subcommittee Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Rt. 30 Corridor Design JPA SAN BAG SCAG Regional Council SCAG Community & Economic Development Subcommittee DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Biane AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Committee Cable Television Subcommittee Economic Development/Foothill Blvd. Task Force Fire District Personnel Committee General Plan Subcommittee Housing Set Aside Subcommittee Inland Empire League of California Cities League of California Cities Economic, Comm Dev & Hsg Subcorn Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee Ontario Convention & Visitors Authority Public Works Subcommittee SCAG Solid Waste Subcommittee SCAG-Regional Council DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS December 16, 1998 Curatalo Cable Television Subcommittee Central Park Task Force Inland Empire League of California Cities Library Subcommittee Mobile Home Accord Review Subcommittee Multi-Family Development/Sign Task Force Public Safety Subcommittee Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE Dutton AB939 Solid Waste Task Force Chamber of Commerce Representative Community Foundation Subcommittee General Plan Subcommittee Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee Planning/Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Williams Central Park Task Force Chamber of Commerce Representative Community Foundation Subcommittee Economic Development/Foothill Blvd. Task Force Historic Cultural Resource Mitigation Task Force Ontario Convention & Visitors Authority Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee Public Works Subcommittee Public Safety Subcommittee Rails to Trails Subcommittee Redevelopment Marketing Subcommittee Rt. 30 Ad Hoc Task Force Rt. 30 Corridor Design Authority Baldy View Public Private Coalition (CLOUT) Omnitrans SAN BAG DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE DELEGATE Alternate Alternate Alternate h: Donna\data\ccsu bcom.98 CITY OF RANC! IO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 16, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Signage Task Force Brad Buller, City Planner and Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SIGNAGE TASK FORCE - A consideration of the recommendations of the Task Force. RECOMMENDATION The Task Force recommends the City Council approve the strategy for addressing sign maintenance, support the recommended priority for enforcement efforts and amend the Sign Ordinance to set a minimum letter height for monument signs. BACKGROUND The Task Force conducted seven workshops and one field trip to review and discuss various issues and topics on signs such as the appropriate sizes of sign area for monument signs, and wall signs, flexibility for sign logos, letter styles, and colors, the proliferation of illegal signs, and the lack of maintenance of signs. The Task Force reconvened in April and May 1998 when Councilman Jim Curatalo replaced former Councilman Rex Gutierrez as a member. The Task Force concluded their assessment of sign issues and forwarded the recommendations to the Planning Commission for consideration. The Commission reviewed the information at the September 23, 1998, meeting and unanimously supported the Task Force recommendations. ANALYSIS This section of the report summarizes the Task Force discussion, conclusion and recommendations based on a series of workshops. Minutes of the workshops, field tour and survey summary are attached. A. Summary of Discussion: Monument Signs (Tenant Identification): The Task Force was concerned with the illegible sizes of businesses' names on the monument signs. Based on the field tour of monument signs around the City, the Task Force recommended that the letter height for a tenant's sign should be no smaller than 8 inches. This recommendation CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SIGNS TASK FORCE December 16, 1998 Page 2 would necessitate an amendment to the Sign Ordinance because the current codes only suggest a minimum of 8-inch letter height. The Task Force was also concerned with the sign area for the monument sign and had considered reducing it from 48 to 36 square feet. Because the City had amended the Sign Ordinance in 1994 to increase the sign area from 24 to 48 square feet, the Task Force concluded that the current size of 48 square feet should be maintained. Tenants' Wall Siqns: The Task Force raised two primary concerns with tenants' signs: 1) whether small tenants within a center should enjoy the same flexibility as major tenants with bigger and more signs since they (small tenants) are the least exposed to street frontages, and 2) whether there should be more flexibility in allowing logos, colors, letter styles, cannister style signs, etc., for all sizes of tenants signs. To assess and better understand their concerns, the Task Force conducted a field tour of signs in various shopping centers within the City. The purpose of the tour was to view the signs as to the differences in letter height, sign area, colors and placement, among major anchors, large and small tenants, as well as the different styles of sign programs from cannister to individual letters. A developer typically would create a sign program with a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of tenants, in response to the City's request; and, owners of shopping centers such as Lewis Homes have stated that retailers (small or large) have accepted the fact that major anchors are given the most flexibility in the size and number of signs because they generate the most customers to a center. Developers also include criteria having flexibility in letter styles, logos, and graphics, or letter symbols in a "can" next to the individual letter sign copy provided the logo is the same sign height. The Task Force concluded that a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of tenants should be maintained, and sign criteria for placement, area, colors, and the preference of individual letters instead of cannister styles of signs should be continued. Lack of Maintenance of Signs and Enforcement of 111eqal Siqns: The consensus of the Task Force was that they believed illegal signs have increased within the City and that some permanent signs in shopping centers were not well maintained, which lead to the perception of a declining neighborhood. In reviewing the issues, the Task Force invited the City's Code Enforcement staff to present an overview of the status of sign enforcement. The purpose was to assist the Task Force in developing recommendations that would be forwarded to the Council to address the issues. Based on Code Enforcement staff input, the Task Force believed that educating and reminding property owners of shopping centers to properly maintain signs would address the issue. However, the Task Force also believed that a notice and abatement process should be developed and only used as a last resort when property owners fail to address the maintenance issue. Summar~ of Task Force Recommendations: Siqn Maintenance: The Task Force recommends that the Council review and rank the proposed strategies below in addressing the sign maintenance issues, and direct Code Enforcement staff to begin the program. The strategies are as follows: /D_5' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SIGNS TASK FORCE December 16, 1998 Page 3 Send notices to property owners and/or property managers, which stress the importance of well-maintained signs and the need to fix signs in disrepair in a timely manner. Prepare a Chamber of Commerce newsletter article about the impodance of well designed and maintained signs. Conduct a citywide survey of all signs that require maintenance and, at its conclusion, begin a notice and abatement process. Staff Comment: Staff will prepare a standard letter for sending notices to property owners on the need for sign maintenance, and an educational article about the importance of well designed and maintained signs. Staff will work with representatives of Chamber of Commerce to have the educational article published in their newsletter. Additional resources (an increase of number of person-hours) for Code Enforcement staff would be needed to conduct a citywide survey of signs that need maintenance and to develop a notice and abatement process. Enforcement of Illeqal Sians: The Task Force recommends that the Council establish the following priorities for Code Enforcement staff in the enforcement of illegal signs: A-frame signs placed within public right-of-way and within street landscape setback area (not allowed by Code). b. Display of multiple banners (Code allows display of one banner at a time). Display of hot air balloons (not allowed except under a Temporary Use Permit for a grand opening event over a weekend). Display of pennants or flags (not allowed except under a Temporary Use Permit for a grand opening event). e. Permanent window signs exceeding 30 percent of the glass area. Display of multiple window neon signs (Code allows display of two window neon signs of generic words and with a size of 2 square feet each; or, one window neon sign of a mix of graphics symbols and generic words and with a size of 4 square feet). Staff Comment: Code Enforcement Division has concentrated the abatement of illegal signs such as A-frames, multiple banners, window signs on all convenience markets within the City. Based on the recommendations from the Task Force, the Council should direct Code Enforcement staff to extend the abatement of illegal signs listed in Items "a" through "e." Window neon signs (item f) were removed from the list because at the November 10 meeting, members of the Task Force directed staff to further study the concept of using neon lights as an architectural feature integrated with the building design. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SIGNS TASK FORCE December 16, 1998 Page 4 Amend the Sign Ordinance to set an 8-inch minimum letter height for tenant's identification for the Tenant ID Monument Sign. Respectfully submitted, William Alexi~e~ Rich Macias WA/JC/RM/PT: N F:mlg JJJames Curatalo o,sto Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Task Force Minutes dated February 26, March 26, April 23, July 23, September 12 (field tour), and November 12, 1997, and April 8, and May 13, 1998 Exhibit "B"- Summary of Task Force Surveys Completed July, 1997 and May 1998 February 26, 1997 CI-i-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, February 26, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; Planning Commissioner Rich Macias; and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy. Absent was Mayor Bill Alexander. Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Brad Buller, City Planner, went over the areas highlighted on the multi-family land use map displayed in the meeting room and provided statistics regarding the City of Irvine's current detached/attached housing ratio (33 percent/67 percent). Councilmember Gutierrez asked questions about the status of development regarding some of the parcels. He said the map was most helpful and asked if it could also indicate the land use designations surrounding the vacant multi-family parcels. The pros and cons of locating multi-family development along Foothill Boulevard were discussed. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, provided a handout and analysis of the City's goals for low cost housing within the RDA area and responded to questions from the Task Force. Other issues discussed included: 'Shuffle zoning" -trading existing multi-family zoning in sensitive areas to other, more appropriate areas. Identifying existing multi-family properties for aggressive development programs by City and RDA. Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes February 26, 1997 Page 2 Mr. Buller stated that eventually, if another City-wide review is desired, staff could work up an analysis on each vacant parcel for consideration by the Task Force. For the next meeting, a revised City map will be prepared showing the vacant multi-family land with the surrounding land use designations. B2. SIGNAGE Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the purpose of the meeting was to identify issues with regard to signs and to develop a scope of work. He informed Task Force members that the Planning Commission and City Council will be considering a number of sign appeals regarding including extraneous information on advertising. He mentioned that staff is in the process of addressing subtenant signs within service stations. He asked the Task Force members to list their sign issues. Councilmember Gutierrez said he would like to see more flexibility in the sign programs as to the choice of colors, letter styles, and logos. Mr. Buller explained to the Task Force that the City's Sign Ordinance does not limit colors. He indicated that a sign program is proposed by the property owner and approved by the Planning Commission for each development. He said the sign program sets the number of colors, letter styles, etc. Councilmember Gutierrez stated that he is concerned with small tenants who are far away from the street frontages and are not readily seen by the public. He suggested perhaps tenants from a pad building need not be identified on the monument signs because they are closer to the street frontages, which would then leave additional spaces to identify the smaller tenants. He also noted his concern for the number of temporaw signs he is seeing. Commissioner Tolstoy pointed to one of the pictures taken by sf~ff that showe, d a proliferation of windows signs and asked Task Force members whether this is the quality of life the City wants. Commissioner Macias and Councilmember Gutierrez agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy and stated that there is a distinctive difference between the City and surrounding communities with regards to signs. Mr. Buller suggested that the Task Force members begin to list their issues or concerns on signs. The following list of issues was developed: Subtenants' signs in a small free standing building Subtenants' signs in major anchors Flexibility in policies Signs pollution Identification versus advertising/marketing Priorities on code enforcement of signs Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes February 26, 1997 Page 3 Because of time constraints, Mr. Buller suggested that the Task Force adjourn the meeting to March 26, 1997. He recommended that the Task Force members make a list of issues for discussion at that meeting so as to determine the scope of the project, the implementation, and the staff resources. He also suggested that at some point the Task Force should invite the Chamber of Commerce to participate. He recommended that a scope of the project be established before involving the Chamber of Commerce. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The next meeting was scheduled for March 26, 1997. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. The meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: March 26, 1997 March 26, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, March 26, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor V~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; Planning Commissioner Rich Macias; and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy. Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 26, 1997 The minutes of the meeting of February 26, 1997 were approved by the Task Force. B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Councilmember Guiterrez began by stating he had studied the maps that were provided by staff and that they had been helpful in understanding the land use relationships in the community. Brad Buller, City Planner, briefly described the process that staff went through in providing analysis of a few vacant multi-family sites. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, provided simple land use analysis for one site at Lemon and Highland and for three sites in the Victoria area. The committee members acknowledged that there are not many multi-family parcels left in the city and few that are isolated in predominately single family areas. Discussion also included various methods of informing the public about existing land use plans and policies. Periodic General Plan meetings throughout the community, inserts in the Grapevine, or investigation of setting up a signing program for all vacant parcels (identifying their intended land use) were mentioned. Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes March 26, 1997 Page 2 Mr. Buller stated that once the Task Force makes recommendations on how the City should proceed, he will work with the City Manager to develop a work and funding program for City Council consideration. For the next meeting, the Committee asked for similar analysis with maps of other areas of the City. Mayor Alexander requested figures be provided regarding the disbursement on existing multi-family units throughout the community. He suggested that the figures be provided in quadrants around the intersection of Haven and Base Line. B3. SIGNAGE Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that this meeting was a continuation of a dialogue between members of the Task Force in identifying sign issues. Councilmember Gutierrez brought up the issue of fairness for a small commercial center to have the same number of monument signs and the same size of sign area as a larger commercial center. He cited the example of a larger commercial center such as Masi Plaza and pointed to the photos that showed the monument signs for the smaller centers along Foothill Boulevard. He thought smaller tenants in a larger commercial center are being penalized with regard to signs. Mr. Buller responded that Masi Plaza can have more than one monument sign and stated that the issue is a request from the applicant to double the height of the monument to 16 feet, which would require an amendment to the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Buller informed the Task Force that there is a series of sign appeals that deal with national registered logos, colors, and advertising messages. He cited Oil Max as an example. He asked the Task Force how far the City should go in allowing advertising messages such as "10 minute oil change" or corporate colors. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the marketing of a business changes with the market trend and advertising message would change with times. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The next meeting was scheduled for April 23, 1997. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes March 26, 1997 Page 3 The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: April 23, 1997 April 23, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, April 23, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:03 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and Planning Commissioner David Barker (Alternate). Absent were Task Force members: Planning Commissioners Rich Macias and Peter Tolstoy. Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 26, 1997 The minutes of the meeting of March 26, 1997 were approved by the Task Force. B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Brad Buller, City Planner, bdefiy described the process that staff went through in providing analysis of a few vacant multi-family sites at the previous meetings. Additionally, he provided information on the school impaction issues and a breakdown of the distribution of existing rental units around the intersection of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, provided simple land use analysis for one site at Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, one site at Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue, one site north of Foothill Boulevard between the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, and for three sites around the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road. Councilmember Gutierrez brought up the site north of Highland Avenue for additional study. He asked if staff could work up a conceptual single family tract layout similar to those surrounding it to see if the parcel configuration makes the site acceptable for a potential single family project. He also led discussion on the potential for shifting multi-family units to the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway. Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes April 23, 1997 Page 2 Mr. Buller discussed the benefit to retail and service businesses of having residences located near the Foothill Boulevard corridor. He also provided insight into the issues needed to be studied when contemplating introducing residential projects into areas where residential uses were not previously planned. Shed Rojo, 12477 Tamarisk, Rancho Cucamonga, asked for clarification on some of the land use designations in Terra Vista near Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Mr. Buller stated that once the Committee makes recommendations on how the City should proceed, he will work with the City Manager to develop a work and funding program for the City Council's consideration. The next meeting was scheduled for May 28, 1997, and the commit'tee requested that Ms. Rojo let her neighbors know of the next meeting and inform staff of how many express interest in attending. It was confirmed that all of the committee meetings are open to the public. B3. SIGNAGE It was determined that Signage would be discussed at the next meeting. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Signage will be added to the next agenda. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no public comments at this time. The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: July 23, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CAI L TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, July 23, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:18 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander;, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez (arrived at 5:30 p.m.); and Planning Commissioners Rich Macias and Peter Tolstoy. Staff present were: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, and Alan WarTen, Associate Planner. B. ITFMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTFS; Apdl 23, 1997 The minutes of the meeting of April 23, 1997 were approved by the Task Force. B2. MULTI-FAMILY DFVFLOPMFNT This item was discussed after B3. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, bdefiy described the general land use issues concerning the vacant multi-family sites in the Victoda and Eftwanda areas. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, responded to Task Force member questions. The Task Force concurred with the concept of using multi-family projects as a step up in land use intensity next to commercial sites. It was agreed that where commercial sites are surrounded by streets, single family development could be acceptable next to the commercial. The Task Force members agreed to the following: 1. The Highland Avenue and Deer Creek site should be reconsidered by the City. 2. The Etiwanda sites along the 1-15 Freeway, just north and south of Base Line Road, need not be reconsidered at this time. Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 2 The Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue site need not be further reviewed because there is an approved map. Recommendations on the remaining sites should be discussed at the next meeting A. East of the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard. B. Northwest of the mall site to the future freeway. B3. SIGNAGE Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, stated that the purpose of this mee~ng was for the Task Force t~ review the sign issues listed in the staff report, and provide direction or a conclusion to them. She said that the sign issues were compiled based on discussions at previous meetings. The Task Force reviewed the first item in the staff report and recommended that the business community should be better educated on the changes. Mayor Alexander asked whether staff has records showing the City has notified the owners/property managers of shopping centers of the changes; i.e., allowing an additional monument sign and additional sign copies on the monument sign. Ms. Fong replied that staff will provide those records to the Task Force. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested that the best way to educate the business community is through the Chamber of Commerce. Mayor AJexander stated that he will be giving the State of the City speech at the September Chamber meeting and he could include signs information in his speech. Ms. Fong indicated staff will provide the necessary information for the Mayor in time for the September meeting. The Task Force reviewed the second item in the staff report and recommended no further discussion on the subject. Mayor Alexander asked how the City can encourage the property managers to be more responsive to the needs of the tenants. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, informed the Task Force that typically the manager of the shopping center will wait until the tenants' leases are up for renewal before negotiating with them for additional signage if they desire. Commissioner Macias felt the City's codes are already generous in allowing logos, colors, and letter styles. //? Recommendations on sites: Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes July 23, 1997 Page 3 The Task Force agreed and recommended no further discussion for Item 3 in the staff report. Councilman Gutierrez arrived at 5:30 p.m. The Task Force reviewed Item 4 in the staff report and agreed that the Council needs to establish a priodty list for code enforcement and that additional staff would be needed to accomplish the goal. Councilman Gutierrez stated that he is concerned with the size of the tenants' names on monument signs. He felt the smaller letter size affects the readability of the business names. He asked if staff would provide samples of monument signs of 24, 36, and 48 square feet in size, which would show the differences in the letter sizes and their readability. Mayor Alexander suggested that the best way to see the difference is to go on a field tour in the City. He suggested noon time. The Task Force agreed. It was requested that a field tour be set after August 10, 1997. Nancy Fong summarized that the four items listed in the staff report have concluded and staff will provide additional information on monument signs and arrange a field tour after August 10, 1997. C, IDENTIFICATION OF ITFM$ FOR NFX'r MFFTING East of the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard and Northwest of the mall site to the future freeway. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUB! IC There were no public comments at this time. The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. F. ADJOURNMFNT Respectfully submitted, Approved: Brad Buller City Planner September 12, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY/SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES A FIELD TRIP TO VIEW RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMERCIAL SIGNS Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special field trip of the Rancho Cucamonga Signage Task Force was held on Friday, September 12, 1997. The field trip was called to order at 12:10 p.m. The Task Force departed from Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center and visited various sites within the City. Present were Task Force members: Mayor VVilliam J. AJexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and Planning Commissioner Rich Macias. Absent was Task Force Member: Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES; July 23, 1997 The minutes of the meeting of July 23, 1997 were approved by the Task Force. B2. SIGNAGE FIELD TRIP Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, described the different monument signs as the Task Force visited them at various sites in the City. She explained that the readability of the signs is affected by the letter size, style, colors, and length of the sign copy. She stated that script letter styles, blue or green colors on a white background, sign copies with too many words, and too many signs on the monument make signs harder to read. She observed that because the Sign Ordinance only recommends an 8-inch minimum letter size, staff cannot require it as a standard. Councilman Gutierrez thought a 36 square foot monument sign may be better than a 48 square foot one because the number of sign copies could be reduced, increasing the readability. There was consensus from the Task Force to discuss the size of the monument signs at the next scheduled meeting. The Task Force also agreed to discuss the possibility that the 8-inch minimum letter size should be a standard and not a recommendation. Councilman Gutierrez asked why staff does not allow can signs. Signage Task Force Minutes September 12, 1997 Page 2 Brad Buller, City Planner, responded that there are centers and sign programs that require can signs but the Planning Commission has established a design policy encouraging individual letters instead of can signs for all new centers. He stated that typically all sign programs for shopping centers have been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. He indicated the only exception was Masi Plaza, which was directed to the City Planner by the City Council. He suggested the Task Force discuss the issue further and provide direction or specific guidelines for staff regarding can signs versus signs with individual letters. The Task Force agreed that the issue of can signs should be further discussed in the next scheduled meeting. The Task Force also stated that they have a concern with the maintenance of signs which could lead to the perception of a declining neighborhood. Brad Buller suggested that the Task Force discuss the maintenance issue at the next scheduled meeting and forward a recommendation to the City Council on establishing policies and priorities for the maintenance of signs in the City. The Task Force agreed that staff will set another meeting to discuss the identified issues. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MEETING The size of monument signs and can signs versus signs with individual letter. There were no public comments. The field trip was adjourned at 1:30 p.m. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC E, ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Approved: Brad Buller City Planner November 12, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor W~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Rex Gutierrez; and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Absent was Task Force member: Planning Commissioner Rich Macias Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner. B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 22, 1997 The minutes of the meeting of October 22, 1997 were approved by the Task Force. B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT This item was discussed after B3. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the issues should be thoroughly discussed by the Task Force prior to completing the survey and forwarding the results as a recommendation to the City Council. The Task Force members agreed that another meeting, solely to discuss land use issues, should be scheduled. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff would set up a meeting as requested. B3. SIGNAGE Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, and Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, were invited to the meeting so that they could make a presentation to the Task Force about the resources and priorities with regards to sign enforcement. Mr. Alcom informed the Task Force that the sign enforcement program is in a reactive mode. He stated that the sign complaints received are prioritized according to the following categories: highest are the legal or Multi-Family Development and Signage Task Force Minutes November 12, 1997 Page 2 illegal signs that are public safety hazards, second are the illegal signs that Codes do not allow, and lastly the signs without permits that could be legalized. Commissioner Tolstoy brought up the issue of the proliferation of illegal banners in commercial centers. Mr. Makshanoff stated that when staff responds to sign complaints in a commercial center, it is necessary to review any other sign violations in the same center. He added that staff cannot be selective in the enforcement of sign violations. He informed the Task Force that the proposed enforcement program is to first conduct a photo survey of commercial centers and document the sign violations before the actual enforcement of codes. Mayor Alexander added that the Council has approved one additional staff position for addressing enforcement of codes whether they are sign violations or property maintenance violations. The Task Force supported the procedures that once a sign complaint has been received, staff will review all other sign violations within the same center and enforce them comprehensively. The Task Force also recommended that Code Enforcement staff complete the photo survey of commercial centers and pro-actively address the sign violations. Mr. Buller requested that Task Force members complete the survey in the Summary of Discussion and return it to staff before the next scheduled meeting. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Summary of issues for Signs and Multi-Family development. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no public comments at this time. The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Approved: Brad Buller City Planner April 8, 1998 CI'T-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, Apdl 8, 1998, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor W~lliam J. Alexander; Councilmember Jim Curatato; and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Absent was Task Force member: Planning Commissioner Rich Macias Staff present were: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Brad Buller, City Planner, highlighted issues and recommendations reviewed at previous meetings for new Task Force Member Councilmember Curatalo. It was requested that members complete the site surveys for discussion at the next meeting. B2. SIGNAGE Mr. Buller explained why the item of window neon signs was on the agenda. He stated that Dr. Rosenstein, a local businessman who owns an optometrist shop, requested that the Task Force review the window neon tubes around storefront windows of his shop and determine whether they would support an amendment to the Sign Ordinance to allow such neon tubing. He explained that Dr. Rosenstein's request was in response to a notice he received to abate the neon tubing, which was the result of a complaint from former. Councilmember Gutierrez. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, informed the Task Force that Dr. Rosenstein has agreed to take care of the health and safety hazards of the exposed neon tubing. He added that staff would put a hold on enforcing this case until the Task Force has provided directions on neon tubing. The consensus of the Task Force was to continue the item to the next meeting on May 13, 1998, so that members could visit Dr. Rosenstein's shop to review the neon tubing around the windows and assess the request. Multi-FamiLy Development and Signage Task Force Minutes April 8, 19987 Page 2 Mr. Buller also reminded the Task Force to complete the Summary of Sign Task Force Discussion survey and returned it to staff. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Summary of issues for Signs and Multi-Family development. D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There were no public comments at this time. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. E. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Approved: Brad Buller City Planner May 13, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNAGE TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A, CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Multi-family Development and Signage Task Force was held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor William J. Alexander, Council Member Jim Curatalo, Planning Commissioner Rich Macias, and Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; and Alan Warren, Associate Planner B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 12, 1997 April 8, 1998 The minutes of the meetings of November 12, 1997, and Apdl 8, 1998, were approved by the Task Force. B2. MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT- Discussion of Multi-Family Housing Properties in Three Areas This item was discussed after B3. The Task Force agreed that Area 1, the northeast comer of Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue, should be included in the next available General Plan Amendment cycle. It agreed the remaining areas could and should wait until a General Plan update or be considered in conjunction with development proposals in and around the specific study areas. The Task Force discussed the General Plan revision/update issue. It was recommenced that a community-wide visioning out-reach program should be considered prior to a decision on how or when to revise the General Plan. It was felt that in this way, the citizens could help identify what issues need to be focused on. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION ON SIGNS SIGN TASK FORCE MEETING OF JULY 23, 1997 Staff informed members of the Task Force that changes have been made to the Sign Ordinance which allow additional project ID and tenant ID monument signs, and that owners of shopping centers have not taken advantage of the new codes. The Task Force believed this information is not widely known. ~ mmunity on th~ educate the business co [~ No further discussion needed More discussion necessary Modification needed Members of the Task Force raised concerns that small tenants within a center are being penalized because they have the least number of signs and are the least exposed to street frontages. Staff informed the Task Force that owners of shopping centers ( Lewis Homes) have stated that retailers (small or large) have accepted the fact that major anchors are given the most flexibility in the size and number of signs because they generate the most customers to a center. The Task Force did not raise additional issues on this subject. Better educate the business community on importance_of appropriate,signs f%major tenants More discussion necessary Modification needed sign opportunities and Members of the Task Force raised the issue that there should be more flexibility in allowing logos, colors, letter styles, etc. Staff explained to the Task Force that a sign program, which sets the number of signs, colors, letter styles, etc., is proposed by the property owner and approved by the City. The Task Force did not indicate to staff how far the City should go in allowing variation in colors. Most of the sign programs in place allow a tenant to have a graphic logo with no restrictions on design and colors as long as it meets the sign heighl and is within the maximum sign area. ~J Nor rthe~ More discussion necessary Modification needed -2- Members of the Task Force were concerned with the level of code enforcement of illegal signs. Staff recommended that the Task Force make recommendation to the City Council to establish a priority on the code enforcement of signs. [~ No further discussion needed. More discussion necessary orce ' o F ard a recommendation to the Council regarding sign enf SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION SIGN TASK FORCE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 COMPLETED ON MAY 13, 1998 At the September 12 special field trip, the Task Force visited various shopping centers within the City to review existing monument and wall signs. Council Member Gutierrez suggested reducing the monument sign area from 48 to 36 square feet and increasing the readability by reducing the number of allowable tenant signs on each monument sign. Staff Comments: Based on the recommendations of a previous sign task force that involved members of the community, representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, Planning Commission, and City Council, the City amended the Sign Ordinance to allow a 48 square foot sign area for monument signs. To date we have two centers that took advantage of the new sign codes and installed the 48 square foot monument sign. Therefore, staff does not recommend reducing the sign area. No further discussion needed More discussion needed Modification needed (Task Force action) The consensus of the Task Force was to establish a minimum letter height of 8 inches to increase the readability of the sign copies on a monument sign. Staff Comments: Staff agrees. By requiring an 8-inch letter height for each line of sign copy and the spacing between the lines, it would increase the readability of the signs. This 8-inch letter height standard would indirectly reduce the number of tenant signs on the monument sign. However, this recommendation would trigger an amendment to the Sign Ordinance. Amend the Sign Ordinance (Task Force action) More discussion needed [~ No further action The consensus of the Task Force was that the lack of maintenance of signs would lead to the perception of a declining neighborhood. The Task Force agreed that a recommendation should be forwarded to the City Council for establishing priorities for the maintenance of signs in the City. Staff Comments: Staff has invited Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, to give an overview of the sign maintenance situation at the meeting His information may assist the Task Force in formulating recommendations to the City Council. The following lists some suggested approaches in dealing with sign maintenance. Send notices to any property owners and/or property managers with signs in disrepair. The notice will stress the importance of well-maintained signs and the need to fix disrepaired signs in a timely manner. b. Prepare a Chamber newsletter article about the importance of well designed and maintained signs. c. Conduct a City wide survey of all signs and, at conclusion, begin notice and abatement process. [~ d. Maintain status quo and respond to complaints only. e. A combination of the above. (Task Force recommended a combination of items a, b and c) The Task Force was concerned with the proliferation of illegal signs in the City. Examples are banners, neon lights/signs, A-frame wood signs, etc. The consensus of the Task Force was to recommend that the City Council establish priorities in the enforcement of illegal signs. Staff has prepared the following list of types of illegal signs for the Task Force to rank the priority of enforcement. (1 is highest and 4 is lowest) The following are Task Force ranking by priority: Display multiple banners (Code allows display of one banner at a time). Rank No. 2 Display multiple window neon signs (Code allows display of one window neon sign. Size is limited to 2 square feet for generic words and 4 square feet for a mix of graphics symbol and generic words). Rank No. 3 A-frame signs placed within public right of-way (not allowed by Code) Rank No. 1 A-frame signs placed within street landscape setback area (not allowed by Code) Rank No. 1 Display hot air balloons ( not allowed by Code) Rank No. 4 Display of pennants or flags (not allowed by Code except under a TemporaW Use Permit for a grand opening event). Rank No. 5. Permanent window signs exceeding 30 percent of the glass area (Code allows the use of up to 30 percent of the glass area) Rank No. 6 o At the September 12 field tour and the October 22 meeting, the Task Force discussed the issue of "can" versus "individual channel letter" signs. The Task Force did not come to a consensus as to mixing the two styles of signs within a center. Staff comments: Because of a lack of a consensus and direction, staff has prepared the following information and questions to assist the Task Force in focusing on the issues and arriving at a consensus and/or direction to staff. How and when do we set up a Sign Program? VVith the development of a shopping center, comes the establishment of a Uniform Sign Program. The developer is asked by the City to create sign criteria for the different types of tenants in the center. The City reviews the criteria to ensure compliance with the Sign Ordinance and the established Sign Design Guidelines and Policies. A Planning Commission sign design policy is to encourage the use of individual channel letter signs instead of can signs for new centers. The use of can signs is accepted only if the architecture of the buildings is such that it cannot accommodate individual channel letter signs. An example is the Sunrize Center at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue. Once the Uniform Sign Program is approved by the Planning Commission, the developer and the City jointly implement it, thus fostering a private/public partnership in ensuring quality signs. Staff routinely reviews and approves signs over the counter if the proposed sign is consistent with the approved Uniform Sign Program. In essence, the established sign program streamlines the sign permit approval process for the tenants. What is in a Sign Program? A center would normally have major anchors, single user pad tenants, and in-line retail/service tenants. Tenants normally want the biggest signs and the most colorful signs that they can get. An acceptable practice by commercial property managers is to set up a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of tenants. Major anchors (over 50,000 square feet) are given the most flexibility in the size of the sign area, colors, letter style, logos, etc. Examples are Montgomery Wards, Target, Best Buy. The next set of criteria is for Sub-major anchors (5,000 to 50,000 square feet) with some restrictions on sign area for ensuring proportionality but still allowing flexibility in colors, letter styles, and logos. Examples are Big Five, Ace Hardware, etc. Single user pad tenants are the next level of sign criteria, with similar restrictions as the Sub-major anchors. Examples of single user pad tenants are Chili's, Wells Fargo Bank, Blockbuster Video, Hollywood Video, etc. In-line shops may have the most restrictive sign criteria, limiting the sign area, height, and color choice. In all instances a sign program has a built-in flexibility to include a logo, graphic, or letter symbol in a "can" next to the individual letter sign copy, provided the logo is the same sign height. Tenants' Signs Conflict with Sign Program. Businesses change their identity in response to their marketing needs. The change in identity may require changes to their name, the logo design, a switch to can signs showing graphics and letters instead of channel letters, etc. Such a change could conflict with the sign program. Staff has responded by amending sign programs to accommodate tenants' needs as long as the integrity of the program is intact. Questions for the Task Force? Should a 1,000 square foot florist tenant enjoy the same sign criteria as a Target store? No (Task Force action) Should the City continue to maintain a hierarchy of sign criteria for the different types of tenants? Yes (Task Force action) Should the City/developer continue to set up criteria for sign location, area, colors, content, and individual channel letter style of signs? (Graphics showing centers with signs that comply with these sign criteria will be available at the meeting for discussion) Yes (Task Force action) Should the City/developer set up criteria for sign locations and area only, leaving the judgement of content, colors, and style of signs to the developer? (Graphics showing centers with signs that are regulated on location and sign area only will be available at the meeting for discussion.) Yes (Task Force action) NOTES (Please use space below to jot down notes if needed): I&l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON*GA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center: · Lewis Homes is continuing to address several warranty issues, including replacement of the carpeting in the Jazzercise room. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library: · The construction project was awarded to Schechtman Construction Company on November 4, 1998, existing landscape and irrigation has been relocated and the new concrete slabs have been poured. Interior improvements began on December 7 and are progressing on schedule. · A storage container has been set at the extreme northwest corner of the Library to store donated books for the Friends of the Library during the Library expansion project. This container is expected to stay on-site for 3045 days. Stadium: The first plan check for the addition of the Softball field ramps at Sports Complex for ADA compliance has been completed by staff and returned to the design engineer for corrections. · The Cross Aisle Waterproofing bid opening was November 25. Final preparations are being made to award the contract. · Specifications have been received for the re-paint/repair of the exterior stadium grandstand and have been distributed to staff for review. · Bulbs were replaced in all the light fixtures (70-75) in Lot G and sports field (45). This project was done in-house. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 2 Stadium turf renovations will be complete this week. Sports Complex soccer field renovations are undenvay now that the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall is gone. A temporary fence was installed to keep players off the field during the renovation period. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility: · The Skate Park has been completed and grand opening ceremonies were held on December 3, 1998. The park has become a huge success with very good dally turnouts. Heritage Park: · An evening meeting was held with City Staff, Riding Club representatives, and other users of the Heritage Park equestrian arenas. The footing in the two arenas and ways to improve it was discussed. Regrading occurred the next day and user reports have been good. Communication will continue with the users, and additional improvements made as needed. Eftwanda Creek Park: · The costs estimates are being prepared by staff for the addition of two scoreboards and will be provided to City Council for approval in January 1999. Central Park: · Proposals for the community survey have been received from four consultants and are being analyzed by staff. · A Task Force meeting was held on Tuesday, December 8, from 6 - 8 p.m. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: · The December 28, 1998, meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee has been canceled due to the holidays. The next meeting date for the Committee will be January 25, 1999. At the time this report was prepared the agenda for the January meeting had not been set. · On Tuesday, November 24, 1998, between 9:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. the Senior Center hosted its annual 'Crafty Seniors' Craft Show. Hand made crafts and baked goods were featured at the sale. · Sleigh bells will ring in the holidays on Tuesday, December 22, 1998, from 10:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Special holiday entertainment and refreshments will make this a joyous event for all. · The New Year will be rung in early at the Senior Center. Join us on Wednesday, December 30, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. to toast in the new and remember the old. Entertainment and refreshments will be part of the festivities. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 3 Teens: Youth · The Teen Center has begun a staff training program in cooperation with West End Family Counseling, a local mental health provider in the corn munity. The training is geared towards helping staff understand social issues and pressures faced by teens and how to recognize signs that may alert them to a teen with a serious problem. The Center is also gearing up for its extended hours for the school's holiday break. During the two week break, the Center will be open from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on Fridays. Special events and prize drawings are planned during this time. In January the Teen Center will host a Super Bowl Party. The Teen Center is starting up a new schedule of monthly special events. January features an all night "who-dun-it" mystery, the Cucamonga Caper. In February, the 70's return for a special disco party. In March, a triple sport challenge is planned. These events are scheduled for the fourth Friday of each month. In January and February our Teen Trips program will hit the slopes with two very popular ski trips to Mountain High. These annual trips are planned on the school holidays for Martin Luther King Jr., January 18, 1999 and President's Day, February 15, 1999. The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) had avery successful fund raiser at the Founders Day Celebration. The twice monthly "Night on the Town" program has been very successful this year. The program offers an all day babysitting program in December for busy parents who need time to shop for the holidays. In January, Teen Workshops begins its 1999 year with the popular Babysitters Workshop on January 23, 1999. Representatives from the Police and Fire Departments discuss safety measures and how to handle emergencies. Community Services Department staff will discuss how to entertain children. In March, 1999, the Job Skills Workshop returns to train teens on how to find a job. Both of these workshops are free. Activities: The Playschool program has been submitted for a Program Excellence Award for the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). The addition of the integrated program at the Mulberry Learning Center has been so successful, that this element of the program was highlighted in the awards packet. Award winners will be announced at the CPRS annual conference to be held in Santa Clara this year in February. The annual Breakfast with Santa was held on Saturday, December 5, 1998, at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. This year the City restructured the event to be able to accommodate more children and their parents. At the time this report was prepared, approximately 250 were expected to attended. The event is co-sponsored by the Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 4 Youth · Sports: The Sports Advisory Committee will next meet on Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.. At the time this report was prepared agenda items had not been identified. The staff field allocation proposal for the Spring/Summer of 1999 was adopted at the Committee's November 18, 1998 meeting. This field allocation proposal covers the time frame of February 1, 1999 through August 31, 1999. One hundred and twenty-eight (128) three to five year old boys and girls registered for the Fall Pee Wee Deck Hockey program which began on November 30, 1998. This program continues through January 10, 1999. The program takes place at the RC Family Sports Center. The program is offered Mondays from 6:00-7:00 p.m., Tuesdays from 6:00-7:00 p.m. and Saturday mornings from 8:00-9:00 a.m. and 9:30-10:30 a.m. Registration for the Pee Wee Basketball program began on November 2, 1998 and continues through January 14, 1999. Approximately 250 boys and girls ages 3-5 are expected to register for the program. Three hundred and five (305) boys and girls ages 5-17 are participating on 37 teams for the Fall season of the Youth Roller Hockey program. The season began games on November 9, 1998 at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. Playoffs will begin during the first couple of weeks of January, pending weather. Youth Basketball registration ended November 25, 1998. There are 954 boys and girls ages 5-17 registered. Practices will begin on December 21, 1998, with the first games of the season scheduled for Saturday, January 12, 1999. Youth Indoor Soccer takes place at the RC Family Sports Center. One hundred and fifty (150) boys and girls ages 6-14 are participating on 17 teams. The season began on October 28, 1998 and concludes on December 18th. Playoff games will follow the conclusion of the regular games. Thirty (30) children are participating on three teams in the Youth Indoor Volleyball program which takes place at the RC Family Sports Center. The participants are young girls ages 11- 13. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center: · The facility continues to be extremely busy. During the last month (November 1-22, 1998) facility usage for open/drop in play was: Adult Basketball - 319 participants; Youth Basketball - 460 participants; Adult Racquetball - 276 participants; Youth Racquetball - 55 participants; Adult Volleyball -32 participants; Youth Volleyball - 9 participants. · The RC Family Sports Center has been submitted for a Park Planning and Design Excellence Award to the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). CPRS annually recognizes outstanding achievements in facility design and operation. The winners will be announced at the annual CPRS Conference which this year will be held in February in Santa Clara. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 5 Adult Sports: Registration for Adult Leagues for Basketball, Racquetball and Volleyball at the RC Family Sports Center is being taken through the first week in January, 1999. Currently 2,624 men and women are participating on 164 Adult Softball teams. The Fall season concludes at the end of December. Adult Softball registration takes place for Winter leagues between December 14-22, 1998. Registration is currently being accepted for Adult Soccer. Leagues are scheduled to begin play in January, 1999. Facilities: · Requests for facility rentals for Lions Center West have been increasing steadily since the facility opened in October. Staff is researching ways to actively market the facility and has stepped up the customer service level to those who are renting the building. · With the addition of new facilities, staff is in the process of reviewing policies regarding facility rentals and related fees and charges. Any recommended fee changes will be incorporated into the City's report to Council detailing suggested changes to our comprehensive fee schedule. · Lions Center East will be in a down mode when classes and Playschool are on holiday hiatus. Staff uses this time to do through cleaning and maintenance checks on the building. Facility maintenance staff is still working with Lewis Homes and vendors to address the punch list items for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Cable television access for 'the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center, and the Teen Center in particular, continues to be an issue being addressed by staff. The Grapevine: · The Winter issue of The Grapevine is due to be distributed in early December, 1998. The cover story focused on the importance of healthy businesses to the local economy. Contract Classes: · The Fall session of contract recreation classes comes to a close in December. The Winter session begins in January. Community Wide Special Events: · Founders Day Parade and Celebration was held Saturday, November 14, 1998. The theme for this year's event was "American Pride: A Tribute to Our Veterans". The parade was a great success and featured Honorary Grand Marshals that were resident veterans, one from each branch of the military. The Honorary Grand Marshals selected ranged in age from 68 to 82. The Celebration began at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex at 10:00 a.m. To assist hungry vendors during their booth set-up on the day of the event, the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 6 Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club came out beginning at 8:00 a.m. to serve a hearty Pancake Breakfast. Festivities for the day also included the parade award ceremony, an art and craft fair (80 art/craft vendors and in-home businesses), continuous entertainment, fun activities and rides for the children, great food vendors. This year, new to the event, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce held their Business Expo in conjunction with our Founders Day Celebration. Approximately 25 business vendors participated in the event at the Epicenter. There were two unfortunate disappointments this year associated with the event -- we had to cancel both the Farmers Market and the Car Show due to lack of participation. Next year staff will need to market these activities earlier and network with other cities and agencies to attract participants for both of these activities. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facility Opening - On December 3, 1998, a ribbon cutting ceremony was held at the Skate Facility. The event was attended by City Council, members of the Park and Recreation Commission, Department Heads, Active Ride Shop representatives, members of the skate facility task force, and members of the community. Amusing Children's Theater (ACT) will return on the third Saturday of each month beginning in January, 1999 and will run through April, 1999. Staff is in the process of planning and contracting a variety of entertainment and performances for the entire family. All performances will be held at Lions West. Proposed Boxing Program: · Staff is currently researching community organizations who potentially may be interested in providing a boxing program. Senior Transportation Program: The bus for the senior transportation program has been received by the City. Since the vehicle was purchased through the State of California Procurement Department the title of the vehicle must be issued directly to the City. The YMCA has requested that the City pay the $1,308 transfer of title fee. It is anticipated that transfer of title will be accomplished within the next 4-6 weeks. Staff is working with the vendor for the installation of the base station and radios that were purchased by the City to augment this program. The YMCA and the City have been working with a graphic artist for the development of a design for the program and the bus. Staff is seeking bids for the installation of the design onto the bus. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 7 Trips and Tours: · Huntington Harbor"Cruise of Lights" - December 19, 1998. A wonderful trip is planned to view the beautifully decorated waterfront homes in Huntington Harbor. Along the hour voyage participants will see hundreds of twinkling lights outlining the homes as the boat winds its way through the Huntington Harbor channels. Cost of the trip is $26 per person. Two buses for this trip are sold out. · Rose Parade - January 1, 1999. Participants will not only get to see the world famous Rose Parade and its giant floral floats, bands and equestrian units but they get there in style and without any hassle. Parade goers will ride the Metrolink to Arcadia where they will then board buses to take them to their special grandstand seats on Colorado Boulevard. (Sorry, trip is sold out.) · Long Beach Aquarium - January 23, 1999. Participants will discover the wonder of the sea on this trip. Everything from massive sharks to the bright orange Garibaldi fish native to Califomia. Cost for this trip is $26. (At the time this report was prepared there were 20 spaces available.) Human Services: · Commodity Distribution - First Monday of the month from 1:30 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. USDA surplus food products are distributed to low income Rancho Cucamonga residents on a first come, first served basis. Food will be distributed on January 4, 1999. · The Doctor is In - Free monthly seminars on topics of interest. All seminars take place at the Senior Center between 12 noon and 2:00 p.m.. January 19 - "Osteoporosis: What's New, What's Old and What the Future Holds. Featured speaker: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen. · Elder Law Seminars - Monthly seminars for senior citizens. All seminars take place at the Senior Center between 11:00 a.m. and 12 noon. December 18 - "Does A Reverse Mortgage Make Sense for Me?" January 22 - "How Does the New Tax Law Affect the Capital Gains on the Sale of my Home". · Senior Information and Assistance - Referral service available at the Senior Center by appointment on the 4th Thursday of the month between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 12 noon. Services are provided by the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult Services. Park and Recreation Commission: · During the reporting period the Park and Recreation Commission discussed or took action on the following items: - Consideration and discussion of recommendation from Route 30 Task Force relating to parking at West Beryl Park. - Consideration and discussion of recommendations for establishment of a Community Services Network. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE December 16, 1998 Page 8 - Review and update of Community Services Department's grant awards and potential funding opportunities. - Consideration of 1999 Spring/Summer Youth Sports Group Field Allocation proposal. - Consideration and discussion regarding waiver of December 17, 1998, Park and Recreation Commission meeting. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. - Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. - Consideration of waiving December 28, 1998, Senior Advisory Committee meeting. Epicenter: · Since the last reporting period the following activities have taken place at the Epicenter: -Community Services Department - Founders Day Celebration (November 14, 1998) -Commercials While U Wait - Agrarfrost (German frozen food commercial) (December 9 & 10, 1998; rain date: December 11, 1998) · Staff is working with the following representatives for future events at the Epicenter: -Community Services Department - Children's Concert (April 3, 1999) -Calvary Chapel Chino Hills - Sunrise Easter Services (April 4, 1999) -Califomia Association of School Transportation Officials - School Bus Roadeo (April 16/17, 1999) -Hillside Community Church - Soapbox Derby & Community Fair (May 30/31, 1999) -AB Miller High School - 1999 Graduation (June 16, 1999) -Rancho Cucamonga High School - 1999 Graduation (June 17, 1999) Staff is in the process of preparing marketing information conceming the Epicenter for inclusion on the Intemet. ed, Cc r~unity Dev~opment Director Community Services Director R~. :KM:KME