Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/05/18 - Agenda PacketF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center 0rive ~* Ran~:h~ CUCamonga,~CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS Redevelopment Agency Fire Protection District City Council ]~GULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. MAY 18, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. ORDER OF BUSINESS Closed Session ................... Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers · Regular CitY Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~.~RANcHO TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all pemons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility, Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and Pagers while the meeting is in session. cl~c~o UCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN IHE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander__, Gutierrez __, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May t5-2`1, 2005, as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week. 2. Presentation of Plaques of Appreciation to donors and sponsors of the Rancho Cucamon§a Wellness Fair held April 30, 2005, at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center. 3. Presentation of an Award for "Best Walking Cities" by the California Podiatric Medical Association, the American Podiatric Medical Association and Prevention Magazine. 4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May '15-21, 2005, as "Blue Ribbon Week" in recognition of "National Police Week 2005." 5. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 15-21, 2005, as "Public Works Week." 6. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition in appreciation of years of service to: Joyce Womack, Library Board, and Paula Pachon, Library Foundation. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Check Register 4/27/05 through 5/10/05 and Payroll 4/27/05 through 5/10/05, for the total amount of $5,240,984.01.  I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD mN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 2 cRANcHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2005. Approval of a Public Convenience and Necessity, DRC2005-00360 - Han Maeum Market, for a Type 21 off-sale liquor license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M- APN: 0208-301-16. RESOLUTION NO. 05-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2005-00360 FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND AN ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE, LOCATED AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-301-16 Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2004/05 appropriations. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 05/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1176303560/1022176 (Measure "r'), 11703035650/1022170 (Gas Tax) and 12043145650/1527204 (Community Development Block Grant). RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 05/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 05/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure "1", Acct. No. 11763035650/1022176 for construction of said projects. 27 33 44 46 112 115 120 ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MELTON6 TO BE HELD I. THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIT¢ 3 C[:~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA 10. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 05-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFiCATiONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 05/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAiD CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to appropriate $15,500 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award Fund balance into Acct. No. 1366702-5603, for the purchase of two (2) Segway People Transporters and related equipment. Approval of Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. Approval to negotiate a contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure, to be funded from Capital Reserve funds, Acct. No. 1025001-5602. Approval of Map located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp submitted by Aim All Storage 210, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16648 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16487, located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16487, iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS 123 128 134 145 147 150 151 154 cR~cHo UCAMONOA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 4 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. RESOLUTION NO. 05-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16487 Approval of Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173 - Amanda Lopez-Castanon, to designate the Buehler House as a Designated Local Landmark, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208- 131-12. Related File: Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179. RESOLUTION NO. 05-162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2005-00173 DESIGNATING THE BUEHLER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9650 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-131-12 Approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179 (CO 05-044) with Amanda Lopez-Castanon to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Buehler House, currently applying for Historic Landmark status, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208-131-12. Related File: Landmark Designation DRC2005- 00173. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Mathis & Associates (CO 05-045) to assist the City Council in an evaluation of the City Manager. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP95-25, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Sahga Group, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 05-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING {MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP95-25 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2002-00519, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway northbound on ramp, submitted by Fountainhead Delta, LP. 155 163 177 163 192 219 222 223 , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD [N THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY 5 cR,~ceo HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG^ 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23, 24. RESOLUTION NO. 05-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002- 00519 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16512, located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16512 Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between La Grand Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corporation. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-67, located on the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, .submitted by Ironwood Apartments, LLC. Approval of the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659, located south of Wilson Avenue, east of Hanley Avenue (Bluegrass Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-2, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-3, located on the southwest corner'of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-4, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16105, located between East Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, south of Base Line Road, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes (formerly Rancho Cucamonga Land Co., LLC). 226 227 230 231 233 235 237 239 241 243 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCAMONGA 25. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 245 16193, located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Empire Homes II, LLC. 26. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of the 247 Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16302, located on the northeast corner of Smokestone Street and Mulberry Street, submitted by APHRC23, LLC. 27. Approval to accept Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, II & III Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept 249 Maintenance Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for the Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, I1 & III Improvements for Rancho Etiwanda, located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard North of the 210 Freeway, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-166 251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA (LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE I, I~ & III) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF 2N° READING OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIME LIMIT TO REPAY INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33670 ON ACCOUNT OF THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 ERAF PAYMENT ORDINANCE NO. 742 (second reading) 252 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(e)(2)(D)  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~UGAMON~A ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS l The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REVISING FEES IN THE 255 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION FEE SCHEDULED APPLICABLE TO ClTYVVlDE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS TO LEVELS MANDATED BY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MEASURE "1", PASSED BY VOTERS ON NOVEMBER 2, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 05-167 257 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO REVISE CITY-WIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING ELECTRIC 260 RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RESOLUTION NO. 05-168 262 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN 264 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 21 3A1 3B, 41 5, 6, 7, 81 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED.  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 ,~,M'~.CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE ~'~*UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 05-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 4. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 5. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION iMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 05-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 266 267 269 270 272  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 (~,RANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS ] Tho following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. .. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION 273 OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ACCELA, INCORPORATED (CO 05-046) FOR $83,034.35 AND TELE-WORKS, INCORPORATED (CO 05-047) IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,045.00 FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN INTER- ACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE SYSTEM, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND 2. UPDATE ON LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM (Oral) lhe following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion, lhey are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. UPDATE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR SINGLE 277 FAMILY HOMES ON THE WEST SIDE OF KLUSMAN AVENUE, NORTH OF DIAMOND AVENUE - Development Review DRC2003- 00015 - Carney. (CONTINUED FROM MAY 4, 2005) 3. CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR ANIMAL CARE AND 284 CONTROL SERVICES (CO 96-047) AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES (CO 96-048) AND DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS  I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 18, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 10 RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE J. ADJOURNMENT I I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 12, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Check No. AP-00222224 AP-00222225 AP-00222225 AP-00222225 AP-00222225 AP-00222226 AP-00222228 AP-00222229 AP-00222229 AP-00222230 AP-00222231 AP-00222233 AP-00222235 AP-00222236 AP-00222236 AP-00222236 AP-00222237 AP-00222237 AP-00222238 AP-00222239 AP-00222240 AP-00222241 AP-00222242 AP-00222243 AP-00222243 AP-00222244 AP-00222246 AP-00222247 AP-00222248 AP-00222248 AP-00222248 AP-00222248 AP-00222248 AP-00222248 AP 00222249 AP 00222250 AP 00222250 AP 00222250 AP 00222250 AP 00222250 AP 00222251 AP 00222252 AP 00222253 AP 00222255 AP-00222257 AP-00222258 AP-00222259 AP-00222259 AP-00222260 AP-00222261 AP-00222261 AP-00222262 AP-00222263 AP-00222265 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ADAMSON, RONALD ADAPT CONSULTING INC ADAPT CONSULTING INC ADGRAPH ALLEN, CHRIS ALTA DENA DAIRY INC. AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ASSI SECURITY ASSOCIATED GROUP AT AND T AUTO RESTORATORS INC AVILA, GILBERT B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY BATTAFORANO, RAQUEL BEN CLARK TRAINING CENTER BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION BORGER, JANEEN BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BULLER, BRAD BURRIGHT, TERI BURTON, OTILIA CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALSENSE CALSENSE CARL'S JR. SPECIAL EVENTS DEPT. CHICKS SPORTING GOODS 1NC CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC CITY NATIONAL BANK CLABBY, SANDRA CLOUD, MICHELLE Amount 4.35 17.78 172.52 56.66 275.00 16.39 1,155.00 490.95 478.45 50.55 254.05 154.56 54,336.91 223.03 37.71 534.42 1,229.45 1,329.74 235.00 1,636.59 2.62 108.00 30.00 280.88 699.11 265.67 60.00 146.00 60,791.45 49,747.50 36.94 -6,079.15 -3.70 -4,974.75 30.00 1,068.7I 987.58 755.86 870.12 328.10 117.61 50.75 59.00 315.92 72,238.07 3,919.51 223.91 1,236.94 1,805.00 300.24 1,147.15 4,349.83 1,000.00 44.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~ 17:55:4 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222266 4/27/2005 AP - 00222268 4/27/2005 AP - 00222269 4/27/2005 AP - 00222270 4/27/2005 AP - 00222272 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP.- 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4~27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 AP - 00222275 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CLOUT CONENGR CORP COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS [NC CROOK, CATHERINE CSUS/OTS SUMMIT 2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 1,000.00 9,250.00 88.00 705.00 77.06 44.06 34.83 120.67 125.29 83.54 171.56 154.23 83.34 216.81 212.72 131.86 107.99 60.25 273.94 46.36 71.98 75.43 229.48 69.33 114.88 465.63 259.78 87.38 157.88 114.98 79.33 128.78 85.08 121.08 93.48 72.78 37.13 87.73 102.23 71.63 45.48 38.58 135.70 167.91 67.03 414.11 109.53 143.90 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: 17:55:4 Cheek No. AP-00222275 AP ~00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP~00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP 00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 37.16 491.31 486.68 398.67 301.39 347.27 227.05 120.29 189.09 218.78 288.32 286.00 262.89 213.17 231.66 52.14 292.93 235.13 89.78 174.08 138.28 82.85 144.06 179.62 170.72 68.99 69.00 213.01 ' 126.42 124.15 42.57 42.58 37.14 83.54 387.31 128.78 123.00 60.23 308.81 80.52 155.24 117.21 56.72 127.89 95.49 111.71 52.84 52.84 123.00 133.39 87.47 335.33 221.21 22.49 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: 17:55:4 CheekNo. AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP-00222275 AP~00222275 AP-00222276 AP-00222276 AP-00222277 AP-00222278 AP-00222279 AP-00222280 AP-00222281 AP-00222282 AP-00222282 AP-00222283 AP-00222284 AP-00222284 AP-00222285 AP-00222286 AP-00222287 AP-00222288 AP-00222289 AP-00222290 AP-00222291 AP-00222292 AP-00222293 AP-00222293 AP-00222294 AP-00222294 AP-00222294 AP-00222295 AP-00222296 AP-00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP 00222296 AP-00222296 AP-00222296 AP-00222296 AP-00222296 AP-00222297 AP-00222298 AP-00222299 AP-00222300 AP-00222300 AP-00222300 AP-00222300 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DAPPER TIRE CO DARREL NEWKIRK DATA QUICK DAVIS, TAMARA DE LEISE, JENAE DEL MECHANICAL DEL MECHANICAL DELTA MICROIMAGING INC DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK DIRECT MORTGAGE 1NC. DOMINGUEZ, ROBERTO DP SOLUTIONS INC DUARTE, M1UREL DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP ENMAN, NICHOLA EVERETT, ROY EVERETT, ROY FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL JOBS DIGEST FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FIRST QUALITY PAINTING FOOTHILL CROSSINGS LLC FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC Amount 162.40 106.83 33.53 145.10 129.90 25,185.00 9,750.00 829.13 500.00 93.50 75.00 519.24 533.98 876.07 559.42 203.26 135.00 23.50 1,155.00 1,500.00 64.00 18.80 15.09 1,978.00 250.00 90.00 200.00 27.87 11.74 17.1I 112.50 868.00 840.00 868.00 720.00 414.00 544.00 396.00 612.00 680.00 680.00 680.00 780.00 720.00 595.00 780.00 840.00 14.50 322,866.63 69.50 82.69 52.24 49.95 17.63 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time:q 17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222301 AP-00222302 AP-00222303 AP-00222304 AP-00222304 AP-00222305 AP-00222305 AP-00222306 AP-00222307 AP-00222308 AP-00222309 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222310 AP-00222311 32-00222312 AP-00222313 AP-00222314 AP-00222314 AP-00222315 AP-00222315 AP-00222320 AP-00222321 AP-00222322 AP-00222323 AP-00222324 AP 00222325 AP 00222326 AP 00222327 AP 00222327 AP 00222328 AP 00222329 AP 00222330 AP 00222331 AP 00222333 AP 00222333 AP 00222334 AP-00222336 AP-00222337 AP-00222338 AP-00222341 AP-00222343 AP-00222344 AP-00222345 AP-00222346 AP~00222347 AP-00222348 AP-00222349 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 tl~rough 5/10/2005 Vendor Name FRAYEH, DAVID GALE GROUP,THE GOTCHA TOWING INC. GRAINGER, WW GRAINGER, WW GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC GRAND PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC HESS, LEDYA HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE HILL, GREGORY HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES INC HUMBURG, LORI IBM CORPORATION IBM CORPORATION IIMC IIMC IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP J.M. POOL & SPA INC JAMES, TONI JIMENEZ, MARIA JOBS AVAILABLE INC JOHNSTON, RICHARD KAHN, RICHARD KEVIN KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC KAMRANI, JOSEPH KEITH COMPANIES, THE KING, DAN KLUSMAN LLC KORANDA CONSTRUCTION KORANDA CONSTRUCTION KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC LEONARD CHARLES LEWIS AND LEWIS LEXINGTON TECHNOLOGY INC LOPEZ, NOEMI MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES INC MARES, LUIS MARIN, SHANNON MASTERCRAFT HOMES MATTHEWS, BATHSHEBA MCI MIJAC ALARM COMPANY Amount 254.05 56.47 103.10 66.34 45.73 253,291.13 -25,329.11 250.00 231.25 254.05 2,400.00 16.15 50.34 23.73 136.42 46.30 153.27 21.52 129.52 2.54 101.99 208.14 30.00 622.11 893.11 125.00 91.00 386.00 81.00 48.00 64.00 422.28 68.00 72.13 71,685.82 480.92 48.14 165.00 254.05 4,500.00 6,646.50 3,735.00 3,280.00 500.00 302.29 304.17 113.00 1,108.92 250.00 165.00 27,793.00 16.00 539.20 96.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~l~ 17:55:4 CheckNo. A?-00222349 AP ~00222350 AP-00222351 AP-00222353 AP-00222354 AP-00222355 AP-00222357 AP-00222358 AP-00222359 AP-00222359 AP-00222359 AP-00222359 AP-00222360 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP~00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP- 00222362 AP-00222362 AP-00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222362 AP 00222363 AP 00222364 AP- 00222364 AP-00222365 AP-00222366 AP~ 00222367 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2OO5 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MR TS 24HR TOWING MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING NATHANI, NEETA NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONS RENT NBSGOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS NIETO, EVA-MARIE OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ONTARIO WINNELSON CO ORKIN PEST CONTROL ORKIN PEST CONTROL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION GROUP PARADA, JAVIER PATTON SALES CORP Amoun[ 96.00 155.00 200.00 120.00 143.52 15,597.92 63.82 14,465.34 92.56 46.28 46.28 92.56 85.00 8.01 166.17 96.96 19.17 7.18 15.23 8.23 14.35 174.64 8.30 79.40 439.38 33.35 192.53 348.22 10.37 192.47 2.67 6.95 365.88 131.08 165.23 34.08 370.57 58.10 182.40 141.89 626.40 439.75 808.30 5.09 21.42 103.91 1,033.54 9.07 1,061.11 579.16 842.05 1,000.00 195.20 32.54 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~ 17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222370 AP-00222371 AP-00222374 AP-00222374 AP-00222374 AP-00222374 AP-00222374 AP-00222375 AP-00222376 AP-00222378 AP-00222379 AP-00222380 AP-00222382 AP-00222383 AP-00222384 AP-00222386 AP-00222387 AP-00222388 AP-00222389 AP-00222389 AP-00222389 AP-00222389 AP 00222390 AP 00222391 AP 00222392 AP 00222393 AP 00222394 AP 00222394 AP 00222395 AP 00222396 AP 00222397 AP 00222397 AP 00222398 AP 00222400 AP 00222401 AP 00222402 AP 00222402 AP 00222403 AP 00222403 AP 00222405 AP-00222406 AP-00222407 AP-00222408 AP-00222408 AP-00222409 AP-00222410 AP-00222410 AP-00222410 AP-00222410 AP-00222411 AP-00222412 AP-00222413 AP-00222413 AP-00222415 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name PFF BANK & TRUST P1MENTAL, FRANCES POUK AND STE1NLE INC. POUK AND STE1NLE INC. POUK AND STEINLE INC. POUK AND STEINLE INC. POUK AND STEINLE INC. PRASLIN, ALICIA PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRINCIPAL LIFE PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY QWEST RAMIREZ, SANDRA RAMOS, ERICA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENTAL CARE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOU? RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF RANCHO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBROIDERY RCPFA REED, LISA RELIANT ENERGY ETIWANDA LLC RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHTER, LINDSEY RIDGELINE ROOFING RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROTH, SHELLEY SB AND O INC SCTC SCTC SCTC SCTC SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SANTA ANITA BUSINESS PARK LLC SBC LONG DISTANCE SBC SBC SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC Amount 3,300.00 129.00 30,726.50 33,511.56 326,645.87 5,524.37 62,171.80 75.00 6.81 1,955.00 499.32 7.00 6.86 101.25 25.11 350.00 1,325.84 2.00 20.00 26.00 36.00 48.00 766.91 6,860.51 61.00 2,867.21 716.00 558.03 50.00 475.70 218.72 43.64 68.00 75.00 635.00 120.00 120.00 40.00 80.00 9,515.39 10,200.00 43.25 50.00 188.00 856.24 1,330,355.98 23,426.67 5,844.00 780.35 48.90 0.44 55.61 55.80 41,606.74 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time:7 17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222416 AP-00222416 AP-00222417 AP-00222418 AP-00222419 AP-00222419 AP-00222420 AP-00222421 AP-00222423 AP-00222424 AP-00222425 AP-00222425 AP-00222425 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC SEQUEL CONTRACTORS 1NC SHERATON MARINA HOTEL SHERATON MARINA HOTEL SHOETERIA SHOETERIA SIERRA SPRINGS SIGN SHOP, THE SLOYER, DEBBIE SMART AND FINAL SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 13,379.20 56,039.69 243.22 243.22 150.00 106.66 60.00 219.02 30.00 126.40 393.76 1,327.14 260.96 3,578.89 15.07 14.49 14.97 15.68 14.47 14.37 17.87 20.39 14.47 55.13 15.48 87.70 14.98 121.96 38.40 81.98 43.32 14.50 14.50 14.57 14.47 104.50 17.42 1~.26 15.10 23.70 100.80 21.89 18.86 14.00 14.60 86.48 269.00 86.31 107.43 18.82 14.47 14.47 111.56 14.60 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: ~ 17:55:4 CheekNo. AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-B0222430 Check Date , 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALiFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFOR2qIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 14.00 47.09 28.39 14.97 16.41 14.49 77.57 14.47 14.47 29.72 26.35 14.97 69.58 14.00 15.07 60.42 1,894.85 49.60 14.47 18.92 14.96 58.39 39.73 14.97 76.05 84.26 14.97 27.74 27.74 25.20 149.90 14.47 14.47 14.00 14.50 14.97 14.50 20.73 15.07 47.41 15.68 14.00 14.47 14.47 14.97 15.70 14.50 25.29 14.00 155.49 14.00 14.00 90.28 14.57 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: q 17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP 00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222430 AP-00222431 AP- 00222432 AP-00222433 AP-00222434 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS SPERLING TRANSCRIPTION Amount 55.37 15.19 14.47 108.22 37.52 144.02 20.67 15.68 15.57 19.78 14.47 14.47 14.96 15.19 186.82 32.68 18.53 14.97 14.00 14.47 2,580.33 14.50 52.21 100.91 14.49 14.10 14.84 114.75 83.89 17.10 14.47 14.00 14.47 17.53 57.79 14.83 14.47 14.47 74.87 84.68 15.46 14.60 15.07 15.07 14.50 14.47 14.00 14.60 15.07 15.57 1,111.77 332.00 490.00 18.09 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~ D 17:55:4 Check No. AP 00222435 AP 00222436 AP 00222436 AP 00222437 AP 00222438 AP 00222438 AP 00222438 AP 00222438 AP 00222438 AP 00222438 AP-00222438 AP-00222439 AP-00222439 AP-00222439 AP-00222440 AP-00222440 AP-00222440 AP-00222440 AP-00222440 AP-00222440 AP-00222441 AP-00222442 AP-00222443 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP-00222445 AP 00222445 AP 00222445 AP 00222445 AP 00222445 AP 00222445 AP 00222446 AP-00222447 AP-00222447 AP-00222448 AP-00222448 AP-00222448 AP-00222448 AP-00222449 AP-00222449 AP-00222450 AP-00222452 AP-00222454 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name STERLING COFFEE SERVICE SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY TABBA, HAYAT TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL 1NC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TOMARK SPORTS INC TOMMY AUSTINS FLORIST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TRUGREEN LANDCARE TUCKER & SON INC, J G UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR UNITED WAY UPS VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE Amount 271.01 43,498.30 -4,349.83 48.00 224.88 219.25 226.45 289.00 186.25 225.72 381.10 70.00 70.00 35.00 26,324.94 -2,145.40 -4.85 -2,632.50 21,454.00 48.51 566.32 63.03 236.16 401.47 3,045.87 23,112.28 13,502.32 1,926.08 1,128.76 603.34 14,808.94 15,954.64 50.37 18,964.86 63,765.35 1,700.00 33,145.84 1,658.27 330.86 390.58 2,219.92 359.87 312.06 3,657.00 160.00 585.40 376.30 654.00 701.00 2,763.65 32,471.44 46.00 64.00 500.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time:// 17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP-00222457 AP 00222458 AP 00222459 AP 00222459 AP 00222459 AP 00222460 AP 00222460 AP 00222460 AP 00222460 AP 00222460 AP 00222462 AP 00222463 AP-00222464 AP-00222465 AP-00222466 AP-00222467 AP-00222467 AP-00222467 AP-00222467 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 Check Date 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VIGILANCE, TERRENCE WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST, JERRY L WESTERN CHAPTER ISA WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY WHITTIER FERTILIZER WILLIAMS, MYRA · XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION Amount 28.86 29.37 20.70 29.37 20.55 28.41 29.37 29.00 20.55 20.55 28.91 20.55 20.60 20.55 32.33 28.86 22.51 21.52 20.97 20.76 20.55 20.55 60.34 29.37 56.83 88.14 20.55 29.37 28.41 550.00 67.86 131.69 62.10 254.76 41.85 19.70 519.48 490.48 1,000.00 40.00 218.08 263.99 100.00 150.53 1,794.04 150.53 59.74 164.90 32.58 250.00 758.80 70.15 43.47 80.22 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: 17:55:4 Check No. . AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222468 AP-00222469 AP-00222470 AP-00222471 AP-00222472 AP-00222473 AP-00222473 AP-00222473 AP-00222473 AP-00222473 AP-00222473 AP-00222474 AP-00222475 AP-00222476 AP-00222476 AP-00222476 AP-00222476 AP-00222476 AP-00222476 AP-00222479 AP-00222480 AP-00222481 AP-00222481 AP-00222482 AP-00222482 AP-00222482 AP-00222484 AP 00222485 AP 00222486 AP 00222487 AP 00222487 AP 00222488 AP 00222488 AP 00222489 AP-00222489 AP-00222489 AP-00222490 AP-00222490 Check Date 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 4/28/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION SHERATON MARINA HOTEL SHERATON MARINA HOTEL A AND R TIRE SERVICE A OKAY GLASS AND SCREEN ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC AMADOR, ELEAZAR AMAZON.COM CREDIT AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER ASSI SECURITY AUDIO EDITIONS AUFBAU CORPORATION AUFBAU CORPORATION AUTO RESTORATORS INC AUTO RESTO1LATORS INC AUTO SPECIALISTS AUTO SPECIALISTS AUTO SPECIALISTS B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE Amount 525.54 480.35 45.85 754.94 1,273.56 237.05 117.07 95.24 340.18 459.90 477.30 30.54 75.00 89.28 32.94 164.05 38.46 243.22 243.22 6,811.21 226.80 5.39 9,022.99 837.73 121.22 10.78 18.86 273.17 349.35 1,I37.50 1,575.00 525.00 1,662.50 2,275.00 1,050.00 54.90 177.64 155.40 213.45 146.31 146.31 146.31 67.89 t35.00 17.16 489.2O 8,982.80 97.20 758.87 379.09 41.50 61.75 302.75 5.42 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~,517:55:4 Check No. AP-00222490 AP-00222490 AP-00222490 AP-00222490 AP-00222491 AP-00222491 AP-00222493 AP-00222494 AP-00222495 AP-00222496 AP-00222497 AP-00222498 AP-00222499 AP-00222499 AP-00222500 AP-00222501 AP-00222502 AP-00222503 AP-00222504 AP-00222505 AP-00222506 AP-00222507 AP-00222508 AP-00222509 AP-00222511 AP-00222512 AP-00222513 AP-00222514 AP-00222515 AP-00222516 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP-00222517 AP 00222518 AP 00222518 AP 00222519 AP 00222520 AP 00222520 AP 00222521 AP 00222521 AP 00222521 AP-00222521 AP- 00222522 AP-00222522 Check Date 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 CLASS 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BALLOONS & ALL THINGS TOLE BALLOONS & ALL THINGS TOLE BENGTZEN, WANDA BICKMORE RISK SERVICES BIO CYCLE BISHOP COMPANY BODY SHOTS BONGARDE BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BROWN, LLOYD BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES BURKE, KAREN BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN CA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALSENSE CARR, PAIvl CENTER ICE ARENA CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS 1NC CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT CLARK, DEBORAH CLARK, KAREN CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC COMP USA INC COMP USA INC CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTP,.A MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] Amount 49.83 60.66 80.33 69.38 258.60 149.30 175.00 3,855.00 73.00 38.83 976.50 219.00 330.23 1,156.38 576.00 378.00 114.00 1,122.79 365.00 22.50 25.00 232.33 1,519.00 85.00 84.00 872.94 90.00 110.04 538.20 306.81 7,642.00 12,810.00 592.27 271.25 992.77 67.81 29.60 542.50 2,170.00 875.00 7,000.00 3,500.00 382.00 133.35 66.68 2,373.60 120.65 173.05 604.00 457.00 335.00 21.00 129.30 21.85 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Xime~ q 17:55:4 CheckNo. AP-00222523 AP-00222524 AP-00222525 AP-00222526 AP-00222527 AP-00222528 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP- 00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-0022253I AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 Check Date 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2OO5 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN CORDOVA, CLAUDIA COSCO FIRE PROTECTION COURT TRUSTEE COURT TRUSTEE CPRS DISTRICT XI CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 10.00 100.00 380.00 118.50 200.00 50.00 133.51 79.49 262.92 844.14 89.29 781.54 1,485.91 583.23 987.21 33.68 121.10 864.34 1,489.53 150.79 132.44 44.15 183.96 119.62 372.36 66.68 26.00 179.59 119.06 128.68 64.37 41.82 95.77 1,216.29 376.96 386.38 605.59 646.99 509.33 1,216.85 64.83 226.82 128.73 139.31 133.51 255.54 179.46 61.91 223.26 147.18 164.43 178.31 186.43 44.11 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pom-ait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time~517:55:4 Check No. AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-0022~531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP 00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP- 00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222531 AP-00222532 AP-00222533 AP-00222533 AP- 00222534 AP- 00222534 Check Date 5M/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5/4~2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5~005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5M/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5~005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4~005 5~/2005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5M/2005 5/4/2OO5 5~/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5/4~005 5/4~005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT D 3 EQUIPMENT D 7 CONSULTING 1NC D 7 CONSULTING 1NC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY Amount 56.86 164.78 34.84 128.68 93.34 134.05 77.52 108.57 121.91 70.14 108.00 55.71 82.91 72.44 82.91 75.90 92.17 84.07 38.31 112.64 121.90 145.83 168.83 125.29 124.14 1,192.39 72.48 116.16 360.20 105.68 71.92 27.17 219.24 26.00 116.36 364.79 514.50 263.28 257.66 1,230.60 1,692.91 14.71 59.49 175.83 110.79 25.99 39.49 59.22 100.35 129.35 375.00 412.50 680.98 581.85 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 TimT~17:55:4 Check No. AP-00222534 AP-00222534 AP-00222534 AP-00222535 AP-00222537 AP-00222538 AP-00222540 AP-00222541 AP-00222541 AP-00222542 AP-00222543 AP-00222544 AP-00222545 AP-00222546 AP-00222547 AP-00222548 AP-00222548 AP-00222548 AP-00222549 AP-00222550 AP-00222551 AP-00222552 AP-00222553 AP-00222553 AP-00222554 AP-00222555 AP-00222556 AP-00222557 AP-00222559 AP-00222559 AP-00222559 AP-00222559 AP-00222560 AP-00222561 AP-00222562 AP-00222562 AP-00222563 AP-00222564 AP-00222565 AP-00222566 AP 00222566 AP 00222567 AP 00222568 AP 00222569 AP 00222570 AP 00222571 AP 00222572 AP 00222573 AP 00222573 AP 00222575 AP 00222576 AP-00222577 AP-00222578 AP-00222579 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/t 0/2005 Check Date Vendor Name Amount 5/4/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 784.42 5/4/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,176.63 5/4/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,017.35 5/4/2005 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 972.00 5/4/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 45,902.50 5/4/2005 DANCE TERRIFIC 2,944.78 5/4/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 1,251.42 5/4/2005 DEL MECHANICAL 246.28 5/4/2005 DEL MECHANICAL 166.25 5/4/2005 DELANY, DANI 189.00 5/4/2005 DELGADO, DIANE 45.00 5/4/2005 DELTA DENTAL 35,006.48 5/4/2005 DIETERICH INTER_NATIONAL TRUCK 106.15 5/4/2005 DMJM HAILKIS 19,427.64 5/4/2005 DONALD ANDERSON 500.00 5/4/2005 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 540.00 5/4/2005 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 570.00 5/4/2005 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 270.00 5/4/2005 DUFFY, RICK 2,142.00 5/4/2005 DUN~ EDWARDS CORPORATION 135.08 5/4/2005 DWAMENA, EVA 100.00 5/4/2005 DYAN, DIANE 760.50 5/4/2005 DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION 110,630.50 5/4/2005 DYE AND BROWNING CONSTRUCTION -11,063.05 5/4/2005 DYNASTY GYM 2,637.60 5/4/2005 EASTER, PAMELA 6.79 5/4/2005 EBSCO 7,155.41 5/4/2005 EGGERS, ROBERT A. 671.50 5/4/2005 EMPIRE HOMES 1,000.00 5/4/2005 EMPIRE HOMES 1,000.00 5/4/2005 EMPIRE HOMES 1,000.00 5/4/2005 EMPIRE HOMES 1,000.00 5/4/2005 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 7,820.00 5/4/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 64.58 5/4/2005 EZ RENTALS 177.81 5/4/2005 EZ RENTALS 214.35 5/4/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 250.00 5/4/2005 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 32.81 5/4/2005 FIBRWRAP CONSTRUCTION INC 500.00 5/4/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 5/4/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 5/4/2005 FLEET GLASS 206.01 5/4/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 35.73 5/4/2005 FORECAST HOMES 50,000.00 5/4/2005 FREEMAN, TRICIA 70.25 5/4/2005 GADABOUT TOURS INC 2,712.60 5/4/2005 GALLS INC 409.34 5/4/2005 GARCIA, VIVIAN 24.30 5/4/2005 GARCIA, VIVIAN 22.27 5/4/2005 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 261.00 5/4/2005 GLOBAL PRESENTER 21,475.00 5/4/2005 GOLD'N WEST SURPLUS 1,038.00 5/4/2005 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPANY 20,533.68 5/4/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 158.23 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 05/11/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTP,~IT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlrait Layout Time:, a,t 17:55:4 ! -/ CheckNo. AP-00222580 AP-00222580 AP-00222581 AP-00222582 AP-00222583 AP-00222584 AP-00222584 AP-00222584 AP-00222585 AP-00222585 AP-00222586 AP-00222587 AP-00222588 AP-00222588 AP-00222588 AP-00222588 AP-00222588 AP-00222590 AP-00222590 AP-00222590 AP-00222590 AP-00222590 AP 00222590 AP 00222591 AP 00222592 AP 00222593 AP 00222594 AP 00222595 AP 00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222596 AP-00222598 AP-00222598 AP-00222599 AP-00222599 AP-00222600 AP-00222601 AP-00222601 AP-00222602 AP-00222603 AP-00222603 AP-00222604 AP-00222605 AP-00222606 AP-00222607 AP-00222608 AP-00222609 AP-00222610 AP-00222612 Cheek Date 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/20O5 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 '5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/412005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name GUARDIAN GUARDIAN GUY EVANS INC. HAKIMI, SUSAN HAMPTON, ANTONIA HANGER 18 LLC. HANGER 18 LLC. HANGER 18 LLC. HAPPY ELVES DECORATING HAPPY ELVES DECORATING HARDY, BRADLEY HEILIG, KELLY HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOSE MAN INC HOYT, RAYMOND HSU, STEVE HUNTER, ALEXIS HURST, CHERYL HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1NLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TR~NSPORTATIC INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY INSIGHT DIRECT INSIGHT DIRECT INTERNATIONAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA INTERSTATE BATTERIES INTERSTATE BATTERIES JERRY WILKINS CONSTRUCTION JETER, SAUNDRA JONES, BOB JOUD CONSTRUCTION KAPLAN, DENEAN KEYS, EMMA KIDSART KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY Amount 2,782.16 2,553.40 69.79 312.67 660.60 84.00 126.00 63.00 4,455.00 4,050.00 260.50 819.90 213.70 492.98 404.89 273.15 531.73 38.79 462.40 387.38 51.01 237.13 126.82 5.89 744.30 378.00 34.00 288.50 255.20 100.00 100.00 17.45 93.07 56.74 200.00 100.00 615.00 1,148.00 538.00 302.31 1,764.90 678.83 4,103.41 32,585.08 175.39 44.50 500.00 100.00 2,112.00 1,000.00 1,155.60 25.00 945.00 116.59 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Tim? g 17:55:4 CheckNo. AP-00222614 AP-00222615 AP-00222616 AP-00222616 AP-00222616 AP-00222616 AP-00222616 AP-00222617 AP-00222618 AP-00222619 AP-00222620 AP-00222622 AP-00222624 AP 00222625 AP 00222626 AP 00222628 AP 00222629 AP 00222629 AP 00222630 AP-00222631 AP-00222632 AP-00222633 AP-00222634 AP-00222635 AP-00222636 AP-00222637 AP-00222638 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222639 AP-00222640 AP-00222641 AP-00222642 AP-00222642 AP-00222643 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 AP-00222644 Check Date 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/412005 5~005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5~/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5M/2005 5M/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5/4~2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5M/2005 5/4~005 5M/2005 5/4/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~005 5M/2005 5~/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE KYPREOS, JAMES G LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO LASER TECHNOLOGY INC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND LIM, HEATHER LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE LOPEZ, D£BBIE LUCKOFF, HANS LUQUE, SUSAN MAGRUDER, KAREN MARSHALL, SYLVIA MIDWEST TAPE MIDWEST TAPE MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MILLS, CAREY MITCHELL, WALTER Z MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP MOE, JOIfN MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAiR N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOC NATIONS RENT NATIONS RENT O C B 1LEPROGRAPHICS INC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFG OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF© OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(~ OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF© Amount 3,259.67 23,500.00 1,469.70 476.10 7,127.70 16,565.75 33,809.95 355.34 138.00 600.00 475.20 34.95 50.30 34.00 67.50 1,212.00 184.92 157.93 96.00 710.40 525.00 312.48 499.50 389.43 120.13 5.54 -20.86 580.14 -22.69 38.05 26.58 150.17 128.80 20.86 181.77 44.75 9.37 337.31 40.35 22.69 27,038.22 70.00 48.49 67.35 35.56 59.29 33.21 112.85 65.19 84.87 13.53 65.19 129.40 81.80 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Tim? q 17:55:4 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222645 5/4/2005 AP - 00222646 5/4/2005 AP - 00222647 5/4/2005 AP - 00222648 5/4/2005 AP - 00222649 5/4/2005 AP - 00222650 5/4/2005 AP - 00222650 5/4/2005 AP - 00222650 5/4/2005 AP - 00222651 5/4/2005 AP - 00222652 5/4/2005 AP - 00222653 5/4/2005 AP - 00222655 5/4/2005 AP - 00222655 5/4/2005 AP - 00222655 5/4/2005 AP - 00222656 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222657 5/4/2005 AP - 00222658 5/4/2005 AP - 00222659 5/4/2005 AP - 00222660 5/4/2005 AP - 00222660 5/4/2005 AP - 00222661 5/4/2005 AP - 00222662 5/4/2005 AP - 00222663 5/4/2005 AP - 00222664 5/4/2005 AP - 00222665 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OMNITRANS ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER OPEN APPS ORELLANA, NANCY OTT, LAURA OTT, LAURA OTT, LAURA OWEN ELECTRIC P.C. ELECTRIC INC PAILKER, SHANNON PEACOCK SYSTEMS PEACOCK SYSTEMS PEACOCK SYSTEMS PERVO PAINT CO PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PETES ROAD SERVICE [NC PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PETES ROAD SERVICE INC FETES ROAD SERVICE INC PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC PINCOTT, CARRIE PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES 1NC PRECISION GYMNASTICS PRINCIPAL LIFE PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES L.P. PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Amount 17.04 14.36 40.40 48.38 59.05 2.76 36.18 234.54 83.49 72.26 161.22 87.46 513.41 241.63 20.69 540.61 56.81 23.26 88.66 5.53 61.55 2.09 4.91 33.09 314.50 806.40 500.00 2.00 333.00 120.25 135.00 149.23 110.26 360.00 55.00 208.56 247.83 649.19 498.38 93.01 59.85 400.36 92.94 179.74 60.00 65.00 109.20 13.48 173.71 143.01 1,519.00 16,249.98 191.57 7.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Report:CKAGENDA KEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout CurrentDate: 05/ll/200 Tim~l~17:55:4 Cheek No. AP-00222666 AP-00222667 AP-00222668 AP-00222669 AP-00222669 AP-00222669 AP-00222669 AP-00222670 AP-00222672 AP-00222673 AP-00222673 AP 00222673 AP 00222673 AP 00222674 AP 00222675 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP 00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222676 AP-00222677 AP-00222678 AP-00222678 AP-00222678 AP-00222678 AP-00222678 AP-00222679 AP-00222681 AP- 00222682 AP-00222683 AP-00222684 AP-00222684 AP-00222684 AP-00222684 AP-00222685 AP-00222686 AP-00222687 AP-00222687 AP- 00222688 AP-00222689 AP-00222690 AP-00222691 AP-00222692 AP-00222693 AP-00222693 Check Date 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name PUNO, CLAIRE QUINN, MELBA QUINTANA, ZITA RHFINC RHFINC RHF 1NC RHF INC RAMOS, GRETTA RAYON, SHIRLEY RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA REXEL CALCON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROJAS, JEROME SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYI~ SCOTT, DIANA SENECHAL, CALVIN SENECHAL, CALVIN SENECHAL, CALVIN SENECHAL, CALVIN SHAFER, DAYNA SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES SIGN SHOP, THE SIGN SHOP, THE SILVER, EDNA SIMMONS, ARLENE SLUKA, SUSAN SMART AND FINAL SMIDERLE, BEA SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES Amount 102.00 50.00 193.00 87.00 70.00 70.00 87.00 225.00 77.00 12.46 242.43 518.71 250.68 282.50 204.68 492.00 745.50 1,574.00 3,423.71 13,156.09 1,321.48 3,584.00 1,246.10 8,575.29 26.00 17,991.22 23.89 232.50 175.00 250.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 65.00 90.00 300.00 92,075.00 213.50 250.00 192.50 84.00 59.50 97.00 252.00 27.29 41.70 193.95 510.00 87.00 499.80 8.29 800.00 200.00 300.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Time: 17:55:4 £/ Check No. Check Date AP - 00222693 5/4/2005 AP - 00222693 5/4/2005 AP - 00222693 5/4/2005 AP - 00222693 5/4/2005 AP - 00222694 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP ~ 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP ~ 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIF BROADCASTERS ASSOC SC£ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 1,012.50 1,087.50 200.00 200.00 35.00 14.42 14.82 14.44 27.01 14.88 132.21 14.88 14.49 2.17 419.50 14.44 14.44 14.81 14.82 14.82 14.98 39.60 93.56 16.43 t5.90 16.05 2.73 80.51 79.50 78.19 504.00 16.08 14.47 466.50 15.64 15.35 18.49 14.88 15.35 14.88 79.54 14.98 14.88 14~88 14.44 15.02 14.32 2.53 14.79 3.12 14.46 393.16 14.26 14.47 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Tim~217:55:4 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 0.0222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP ~ 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222697 5/4/2005 AP - 00222698 5/4/2005 AP - 00222699 5/4/2005 AP - 00222700 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFOP,_NIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC STE1NY AND COMPANY 1NC Amount 131.88 15.97 117.95 75.88 131.26 15.01 14.35 15.41 130.17 15.14 14.35 41.32 83.23 118.87 27.84 14.73 15.11 45.47 44.04 172.06 19.13 78.73 65.15 16.54 14.88 13.53 107.11 16.55 76.67 14.62 525.08 24.85 22.23 22.24 12.91 97.44 122.93 714.84 100.76 46.42 15.83 71.02 122.59 65.88 15.38 111.91 14.68 12.63 23.44 49.43 14.96 300.00 57.00 59,210.92 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Tim~ ~ 17:55:4 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222700 5/4/2005 AP - 00222700 5/4/2005 AP - 00222700 5/4/2005 AP - 00222701 5/4/2005 AP - 00222702 5/4/2005 AP - 00222703 5/4/2005 AP - 00222704 5/4/2005 AP - 00222705 5/4/2005 AP - 00222706 5/4/2005 AP - 00222706 5/4/2005 AP - 00222706 5/4/2005 AP - 00222706 5/4/2005 AP - 00222706 5/4/2005 AP - 00222707 5/4/2005 AP - 00222708 5/4/2005 AP - 00222709 5/4/2005 AP - 00222709 5/4/2005 AP - 00222709 5/4/2005 AP - 00222710 5/4/2005 AP - 00222711 5/4/2005 AP - 00222712 5/4/2005 AP - 00222713 5/4/2005 AP - 00222713 5/4/2005 AP - 00222714 5/4/2005 AP - 00222714 5/4/2005 AP - 00222716 5/4/2005 AP - 00222717 5/4/2005 AP - 00222717 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222718 5/4/2005 AP - 00222719 5/4/2005 AP - 00222720 5/4/2005 AP - 00222721 5/4/2005 AP - 00222722 5/4/2005 AP - 00222723 5/4/2005 AP - 00222723 5/4/2005 AP - 00222724 5/4/2005 AP - 00222724 5/4/2005 AP - 00222724 5/4/2005 AP - 00222726 5/4/2005 AP - 00222729 5/4/2005 AP - 00222729 5/4/2005 AP - 00222729 5/4/2005 AP - 00222729 5/4/2005 AP - 00222730 5/4/2005 AP - 00222731 5/4/2005 AP - 00222732 5/4/2005 AP - 00222733 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 4/27/2005 'through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name STEINY AND COMPANY INC STE1NY AND COMPANY INC STEINY AND COMPANY INC STERICYCLE INC STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT STOFA, JOSEPH STORAGE WEST STRATFORD, GAYLE SLrNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE FORD SUNRISE LIFE DEVELOPMENT SWRCB FEES T AND D INSTALLATIONS T AND D INSTALLATIONS T AND D INSTALLATIONS TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TEREX UTILITIES WEST TERRY, DONNA THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE TOOLS R US TOOLS R US TUTORWHIZ INC TYPECARE TYPECARE UN[FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UN[FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UN[FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS UNITED WAY UPLAND TENNIS CLUB UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC UPS UPS UPS VENTURA, LOUIS VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL VICTORINO, VALERIE VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VISION SERVICE PLAN CA Amount 10,000.00 -15,397.93 10,000.00 223.82 806.72 15.00 821.80 135.00 22.78 23.68 18.19 43.83 18.19 744.10 1,469.00 371.20 290.21 569.47 285.46 628.93 227.50 77.13 1,566.16 140.53 361.77 1,440.60 37.71 37.71 692.46 722.58 24.59 41.91 106.73 40.91 23.99 146.23 1,333.27 64.25 549.32 1,713.60 320.00 126.41 44.56 17.19 24.81 318.50 100.98 27.41 50.60 29.51 200.00 521.84 475.00 8,281.44 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Timid, ql 7:55:4 Check No. AP-00222734 AP-00222735 AP-00222735 AP-00222737 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222738 AP-00222739 AP-00222740 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP- 00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP-00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222741 AP 00222742 AP 00222743 AP-00222744 AP-00222745 AP-00222745 Check Date 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~2005 5/4~2005 5/4~2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 ,5/4~2005 5/4/2005 51412005 5~4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4~2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 5/4/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Vendor Name VOLM, LIZA WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WARD, DESIREE WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WEST VALLEY MR~ LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MR.F LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRY LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WEST VALLEY MRF LLC WESTERN SYSTEMS POWER POOL WHITE, CLIFF WILBERTON, DENISE WILLDAN ASSOCIATES WILLDAN ASSOCIATES Amount 112.50 92.96 12.59 452.50 1,339.55 270.10 584.33 117.27 96.41 47.05 406.83 406.83 246.56 199.51 130.21 349.20 281.23 847.71 349.20 1,027.42 26,146.62 437.47 294.44 392.70 325.72 51.70 97.90 180.62 180.18 124.74 83.60 61.82 46.42 67.32 54.78 139.26 95.48 42.68 64.90 69.30 330.82 237.32 224.06 394.40 486.54 367.54 302.26 200.94 377.40 25,000.00 500.00 264.00 15,000.00 62,870.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Tim2 417:55:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 4/27/2005 through 5/10/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00222746 5/4/2005 WILSON AND BELL 345.04 AP - 00222747 5/4/2005 WILSON COMPANY, THE H W 146.00 AP - 00222748 5/4/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35 AP - 00222749 5/4/2005 YANCY, MICHELLE 186.68 AP - 00222750 5/4/2005 ZAILO, ROBERT 57.60 AP - 00222751 5/4/2005 ZEE MEDICAL [NC 408.97 AP - 00222751 5/4/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 37.77 AP - 00222751 5/4/2005 ZEE MEDICAL [NC 31.36 AP - 00222751 5/4/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 61.31 AP - 00222751 5/4/2005 ZEE MEDICAL [NC 131.35 AP - 00222752 5/4/2005 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 994.78 AP - 00222753 5/4/2005 ZETTERBERG, BOB 124.66 AP - 00222755 5/9/2005 LAM, JACK 100.00 Total for Check ID AP: Total for Entity: 4,462,878.36 4,462,878.36 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/11/200 Timbal 7:55:4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Value Value Book % of Value Portfolio Days to YTM YTM Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Investment Agreements 22,882,795.54 22,882,795.54 22,882,795.54 1,515,000.00 1,508,968.94 1,515,000.00 125,750,000.00 123,192,302.37 125,688,175.00 5,000.000.00 4,948,437.50 4,985,546.88 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 Investments 170,747,795.54 168,132,504.35 170,671,51 7.42 13.41 1 1 2.690 2.4~/ 0.89 733 120 2.150 2.180 73.64 1,488 947 3,139 3.182 2.92 1,070 744 3.184 3.229 9.14 I 1 3.682 3.733 100.00% 1,134 721 3.121 3.164 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 617,166.69 617,166.69 617,166.69 (not included in y~eld calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 11333 113.33 Subtotsl 617,280.02 617,280.02 Total Cash and Investments 171,364,962.23 168,749,784.37 171,288,797.44 I I 0.493 0.500 1,134 721 3.121 3.164 Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 439,297.26 4,348,719.05 Average Daily Balance 168,719,811.95 169,259,054.49 Effective Rate of Return 3.17% 3.08% I certify that this report accurately reflscts all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6, 2004. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months est[mated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (tDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the pdor month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bend dccuments govem the management of these funds. On October 21,2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegor~rransamerica in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will eam interest at 6.00% par annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that pedod. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will ~__~_~tere~t ~ 3'he averag~ annual rate of retum over the five year pedod is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above.  - Fr~s~l'ro~surer Portfolio CITY CP un Date: 05,~cj/2005 - 16:57 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2005 Page2 Average Local Agency Investment Fund Par Value Madmt Value Book Value 22,882,795.64 22,882,795.54 22,882,795.54 22,882,795.54 22~82,795.54 22,882,795.54 2.727 2.690 I 2.690 I Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0605OEBQ3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal and Awrage 1,515,000.00 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,508,968.94 1,515,000.00 1~15,000.00 1,5(~,968.94 1,515,000.00 2.150 120 08129/2005 2.150 120 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331QK55 1199 31331QM79 1205 31331QN78 1207 31331Q7C5 1226 31331TFG1 1231 31331TND9 1244 31331'PNH0 1253 31331'PNJ6 1254 31331TG62 1263 31331TU25 1272 3136F6YQ6 1278 31339XJJ4 1210 31339~78 1211 31339X1.~8 1212 31339XPL2 1213 31339YHG0 1218 3133Xl P27 1237 3133X3DX8 1247 3133X4MR9 1255 3133X4XF3 1256 3133X5WA2 1264 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/19/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/0912003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/13/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/13/2004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/22/2005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/1 2/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/16/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/'2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/'2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 FEDERAL ROME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/1 2/2003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 2,500,000.00 2,432,031.25 2,496,875,00 2,000,000.00 1,950,000.00 2,0CO,000.00 5,500,0(X),00 5,357,343,75 5,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,940,000.00 2,995,312.50 2,000,000.00 1,971,250.00 1,996,562.50 2,000,000.00 1,963,750.00 2,000,C00.00 2,000.000.00 1,926,875.C~ 2,000.000.00 4,000,000.00 3,861,250.00 3,997,5CO.00 3,500,000.00 3,468,281.25 3,479,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,989,687.50 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,988.125.00 1,998,600.00 5,000,000.00 4,873,437.50 5,000,000,00 3,000,000,00 2,922,187.50 3,000,000.00 2,000,000,00 1,947,500.00 2,000,000,00 2,000,000.00 1,931,875.00 2,000,000,00 3,000,000.00 2,924,062.50 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,980,312.50 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,971,250,00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,914,062.50 5,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,946,250.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,958,750.00 2,000,000,00 1,000,000.00 996,250.00 1,000,0~0.00 1 ,(X)O,000.00 994,375.00 999,750.00 5,000,000.00 4,916,504.67 4,993,750.00 3,000,000.00 2,939,996.80 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,875,479.74 4,000,000.00 5,000.000.00 4,849,005.13 4,998,500.00 2,000,000.00 1.937,981.87 2,000,000.00 3.120 3.104 1.114 05/19/2008 3.210 3.166 1,129 06/03/2008 2.440 2.407 677 03/09/2007 3.050 3.049 834 08/13/2007 3.375 3.374 876 09/24/2007 3.970 3.916 1,143 06/17/2008 3.240 3.196 1,051 03/17/2006 3.550 3.517 1,296 11/17/2008 3.920 4.012 1,275 10/27/2008 4.000 3.945 953 12/10/'2007 4.(:00 3.970 1,027 02/22/2008 2.650 2.614 771 06/11/2007 Portfolio CITY CP Federal Agency Issues - Coupon FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP.' FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 125,688,175.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2005 Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Page 10/0~2003 4,000,000.00 3,947,644.04 3,997,600.00 2.800 2,782 504 09/17/2006 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,976,911.78 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,429 03/30/2009 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,234,227.56 1,248,750.00 3.650 3~626 1,102 05/07/2008 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,949,325,87 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 901 10/19/2007 04/26/2004 1,000,000.00 982,707.06 1,000,000.00 3.280 3.235 908 10/~6/2007 3.139 947 Treasury Securities - Coupon 912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average 0~/09/2004 5,000,0GO.00 4,948,437.50 4,985,546.88 3,125 3.184 744 3.184 744 05/15/2007 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON / TRANSAMERICA SubtOtal and Average 15~00,000.00 Total and Average 168,719.811.95 10/21/2004 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 170,747,795.54 168.132,504.35 170,671A17.42 3.682 3.682 1 3.682 1 3.121 721 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PR~_PM2) SymRep~ V6.21 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash April 30, 2005 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value 617.166.69 Market Value Book Value 617,166.69 617,166.69 YTM Days to 360 Maturity 0.493 1 Page4 Average Balance Total Cash and Investmentss 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 Subtotal 617,280.02 617,280.02 171,364,962.23 168,749,784.37 171,288,797.44 3.121 721 Run Date: 0Ev09/2005 - 16:57 Portfolio CITY CP Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal 136,958.48 Certificates of DeposlVNeg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Run Date: 05/09/2005 - 16:57 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Activity By Type April 1, 2005 through April 30, 2005 Stated Transsctlon Purchases 0,500 480,208.21 Redemptions or Withdrawals 0.00 Subtotal 1,515,000.00 Subtotal 125,688,175.00 Subtotal 4,985,546.88 Subtotal 15.gnn,nnn nq Total 171,077,038.28 8,111,645.83 Ending Balance 617,166.69 125,688,175.00 Page5 portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21 Report Vet. 5.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended March 31, 2005 Bond Issue Assessment District No 93-1 Masi Plaza Trustee and/or Pavine Aeent US Bank Purchase Account Name Investment Date Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Reserve Fund N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A Maturity Date N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A N/A Yield 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A Cost Value $ 257,658.79 242,837.06 2.57 $ 500,498.42 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Suberd) US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 711/1999 Cash N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 711/1999 Cash N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 Cash N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 Cash N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A 0.00% N/A 1,41% N/A 1.41% N/A 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A 1.41% N/A $ 584,402.66 1,097,891.21 105,175.11 $ 1,787,468.98 $ 2,287~67.40 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. i:~mance~Cash with Fiscal Agents.xls 5/10/2005 2:36 PM RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 1,2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY ,~ooS"-oo,~,O~;~~*'- Hah Maeum Market - A request to issue a Public Convenience and Necessity for a Type 21 off-sale liquor license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M - APN: 0208-301-16. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the determination of Public Convenience and Necessity for Han Maeum Market through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, and forward a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). ANALYSIS Background: The Hah Maeum Market is located at the southwest corner of Ramona Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, as shown on the attached Site Plan (Exhibit "A"). The applicant's establishment specializes in Asian food products including meats, produce, and packaged goods. They do not sell videos nor do they have coin-operated amusement devices. They are open from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sundays. Requirements from Department of Alcohol Bevera.qe Control: The ABC regulates the distribution of liquor licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of liquor licenses to the population of the census tract. According to ABC staff, the off-sale and on-sale licenses in this census tract (0021) total 22. This is 5 over the limit of the 17 licenses and thus, necessitates the City adopting a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. Additionally, the ABC staff stated that a finding of Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) is required by the local agency (as governed by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00360- HAN MAEUM MARKET June 1,2005 Page 2 Code), because of a moratorium on all new ABC licenses within San Bernardino County. The legislation purposely left the term Public Convenience and Necessity undefined so that the local legislative body, in this case the City Council, would have the greatest latitude for discretion based on the local conditions and circumstances. C. Facts To Support A Public Convenience And Necessity Determination: The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience and Necessity: Fact: A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business. Fact: Fact: The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is suited for this type of business. The census tract in which the site is located (0021) is very large, essentially encompassing all land south of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. This census tract also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of the residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district. Fact: The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. The nearest school, Central Elementary, is located 1,200 feet away on Amhibald Avenue, one block north of Foothill Boulevard. Fact: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of alcoholic beverages to the current selection of Asian food products offered by the market. CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the off-sale (Type 21) license at the site will not have a negative impact to the surmunding uses. City Planner BB:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Census Map Exhibit "C" - Aerial Exhibit "D" - ABC Application Work Sheet Exhibit "E" - Census Tract 0021 Alcohol License Survey Resolution of Approval for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2005-00360 rn FOOTHILL BLVD. 0 rn Han Maeum Market 9849 Foothill Blvd Suite M EXHIBIT 'C' 23958.4 B & P APPLICATION WORK SHEET PREMISES ADDRESS_: . 1. CRIME REPORTING DISTRICT :Jurisdiction unable to provide statistical data. Reporting District: Total number of reporting districts: Total number of offenses: Average number of offenses per district: 120% of average number of offenses: Total offenses in district: Location is within a high crime reporting district: Yes/No 2. CENSUS TRACT UNDUE CONCENTRATION Census Tract: ~1 Population /County Ratio Number of licenses allowed: Number of existing licenses: Undue concentration existst/~O.(~7~- ' ' Letter °f public ~on~enience or n~3a~ required: G~overning Bo~/Applican Three time publicahon required~fiNO Person Taking Application Investigator Supervisor EXHIBIT 'D 04-28-05 CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WITH ADDRESS PAGE: 1 10:12 AM WHERE COUNTY IS 36-SAN BERNARDINO AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0021. Census License Licensee Tract Types Status Num Premises 0021. 20 ACT 396593 0021. 47 ACT 220980 0021. 47 ACT 225562 0021, 47 ACT 391455 0021. 47 ACT 410773 0021. 47 ACT 340038 0021. 48 ACT 256121 0021. 41 ACT 420520 0021. 47 ACT 323121 0021. 41 ACT 324102 0021. 41 ACT 324199 0021. 41 ACT 326201 0021. 47 ACT 376666 0021. 41 ACT 327007 0021. 41 ACT 327010 0021. 47 ACT 412565 0021. 47 ACT 350392 0021. 47 ACT 338589 0021. 47 ACT 333875 0021. 41 ACT 339389 0021. 20 ACT 335652 0021. 41 ACT 403739 ANILCO INC 790 N ARCHIBALD, ONTARIO CA 91764 EL TORITO RESTAURANTS INC 3680 INLAND EMPIRE BLVD, ONTARIO CA 91764 ARG ENI M~PRISE8 INC 3640 PORSCHE WAY, ONTARIO CA 91764 CRABBY BOBS FRN~H~SE CORP 3660 PORSCHE WY, ONTARIO CA 91764 INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC 700 N HAVEN AVE; ONTARIO CA 91764 INNSUiTES HOTELS INC 3400 SHELBY ST, ONTARIO CA 91764 MCDONALD STANLEY LLOYD 750 N ARCHIBALD AVE B, ONTARIO CA 91764 ARLINE PARK CORPORATK~N 790 N ARCHIBALD STE B, ONTARIO CA 91764 DAVE& BUSTERS INC 4821 MILLS CIR, ONTARIO CA 91764 HOST MARRIOTT SERVICES USA INC ONE MILLS CIRCLE STE Fl, ONTARIO CA 91764 HOST MARRIOTT SERVICES USA INC ONE MILLS CIRCLE STE F11 & F12, ONTARIO CA 91764 4360 MILL ClR, ONTARIO CA 91764 ~ BROILER ONTARIO LLC 4557 MILLS CIRCLE, ONTARIO CA 91764 HOST MARRIOTF SF_RV~ES USA INC ONE MILLS CIRCLE STE F6, ONTARIO CA 91764 HOST MARRIOTT SERVICES USA INC ONE MILLS CIRCLE STE FS, ONTARIO CA 91764 960 ONTARIO MILLS DR, ONTARIO CA 91764 WDI INTERNATIONAL INC 3550 PORSCHE WY, ONTARIO CA 91764 I MILLS ClR 4541, ONTARIO CA 91764 MILL RING RESTAURANT PARTNER8 L-PSHIP 950 N ONTARIO MILLS DR, ONTARIO CA 91764 980 N ONTARIO MILLS DR STE A, ONTARIO CA 91764 CRO~A[~ AUTO SERVICE LLC 1090 N ONTARIO MILLS DR, ONTARIO CA 91764 TRILLIONS INVESTMENT GROUP INC 990 ONTARIO MILLS DR STE H, ONTARIO CA 91764 EXHIBIT 'E' 04-28-05 CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WITH ADDRESS PAGE: 2 10:12 AM WHERE COUNTY IS 36-SAN BERNARDINo AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0021. Census L~can~e Lt~erl~ee Tract Types Status Num Premises 0021. 47 ACT 338162 0021. 47 ACT 375961 0021. 47 ACT 422153 0021. 20 ACT 352811 0021. 70 ACT 356989 0021. 21 ACT 371428 0021. 20 ACT 375148 0021. 20 ACT 386475 0021. 20 ACT 376960 0021. 47 ACT 379534 0021. 41 ACT 381577 0021. 41 ACT 381960 0021. 47 ACT 382656 0021. 41 ACT 383589 0021. 47 ACT 380635 0021. 41 ACT 395063 0021. 41 ACT 424158 0021. 47 PE~D 410479 0021. 41 47 ACT 412174 0021. 41 ACT 413284 0021. 47 ACT 94 0021. 20 ACT 384227 BENIHANA ONTARIO CORP 3760 E INLAND EMPIRE BLVD, ONTARIO CA 91764 RAINFOREST CAFE tNC 4810 MILLS CIRCLE, ONTARIO CA 91764 CHEVYS RESTAURANTS LLC 4551 MILLS CIR, ONTARIO CA 91764 4421 MILLS CIRCLE, ONTARIO CA 91764 COUNTRY SUITES ONTARIO MILLS L-PSHIP 4370 MILLS CIRCLE, ONTARIO CA 91764 SAMS WEST INC 951 N MILLIKEN AVE, ONTARIO CA 91764 MIWKEN FUEL LLC 4321 ONTARIO MILLS PIG. VY STE A, ONTARIO CA 91764 BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC 911 N MILLIKEN AVE, ONTARIO CA 91764 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 791 N MILLIKEN AVE, ONTARIO CA 91764 ONTARIO STEAKHOUSE L-PSHIP 4492 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY, ONTARIO CA 91764 BAR~A MANAGEMENT INC 4451 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY B, ONTARIO CA 91764 ONTARIO WINGS I.LC 728 N MILLIKEN AVE, ONTARIO CA 91764 COMEDY CLUB OF BREA LLC 4555 MILLS ClR, ONTARIO CA 91764 4423 E MILLS CIR, ONTARIO CA 91764 FOURTH ST & MILLIKEN AVE SEC, ONTARIO CA 91764 RJ KNJ CORP 4320 E MILLS CIR STE A, ONTARIO CA 91764 KlM JAY 14WAN 730 N ARCHIBALD AVE A & B, ONTARIO CA 91764 TOKYO WAKO ONTARIO INC 4480 E ONTARIO MILLS PKWY, ONTARIO CA 91764 B& FLLC 3496 E CONCOURS ST D & E, ONTARIO CA 91764 951 N HAVEN AVE C, ONTARIO CA 91764 C & C ORGANIZATION THE 8689 NINTH ST, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 WANIS BASSAM 8847 ARCHIBALD AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 04-28-05 CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WITH ADDRESS PAGE: 3 10:12 AM WHERE COUNTY IS 36-SAN BERNARDINO AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0021, Census Ucense Licensee Tract Types Status Num Premises 0021. 48 ACT 422858 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021. 0021 0021 0021 0021. 52 ACT 150777 21 ACT 176035 41 ACT 351021 21 ACT 343852 21 ACT 378891 20 ACT 220704 21 ACT 37144O 41 ACT 420777 41 ACT 391976 41 ACT 236704 20 ACT 390331 41 ACT 397023 0021. 21 ACT 255181 0021. 41 ACT 366649 0021. 41 ACT 322261 0021. 41 ACT 278662 0021. 41 ACT 397991 0021. 20 ACT 281881 0021. 41 ACT 424022 0021. 47 ACT 410926 WPJGHT Pt=~ =R A; ~ 8108 SAN BERNARDINO RD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 VFW POST 8680 8751 INDUSTRIAL LN, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CHOWRUSM~EKUL ~RINUCH P 10080 ARROW HWY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 STEER N STEIN CUCAM(:~GA INC 8348 ARCHIBALD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 81730 SAMOUH JAMIL 8114 ARROW HWY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CHB-iAYED JRIS 8939 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 UM IKE KYO 10120 25TH ST, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 DAYAL SUKET 9755 ARROW HWY AG, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 KlM DEBORAH SONG 10970 ARROW RTE 101, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 MR WOK RANCHO CUCAMONGA INC 10877 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 HORTA LUIS A 9223 ARCHIBALD AVE H, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION 8514 VINEYARD AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 FERNANDES BRLaJ~I ~IMON 9640 CENTER AVE STE 150, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 WANIS GHASSAN 8880 ARCHIBALD AVE A, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 8880 ARCHIBALD AVE ~ t'F_ G, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CRAVEZ DAVID 10062 ARROW ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CHANG KO FANG 9028 ARCHIBALD AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 VALLEY CONCESSIONS INC 8408 ROCHESTER AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 SHEHADEH JAMAL ISSA 8694 ARROW I-M/Y, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 PAK7_AT AHMAD 9615 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 OAK CREEK RANCH GOLF CLUB INC 11015 SIXTH ST, RANCHO CUCANtONGA CA 91730 04-25-05 CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WITH ADDRESS PAGE: 4 10:12 AM WHERE COUNTY IS 36-SAN BERNARDINO AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0021. Census License Licensee Tract Types Status Num Premises 0021. 47 ACT 411833 0021, 20 ACT 386468 0021. 41 ACT 327748 0021. 41 47 ACT 367819 0021. 75 ACT 412076 0021. 20 ACT 383685 0021. 21 ACT 328590 0021. 47 ~ 422128 0021. 47 ACT 355714 0021. 47 ACT 409178 0021. 47 R65 389178 0021. 47 ACT 375884 0021. 47 ACT 380642 0021. 47 ACT 390683 0021. 41 ACT 396208 0021. 41 PI~XO 425091 0021. 41 ACT 402069 0021. 41 ACT 402058 0021. 20 ACT 406433 0021. 41 PEND 401571 ~OURMET SY~= ~S OF CAUFORN~ INC 10709 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 BP WEST COAST PRODUCT~ LLC 11768 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 10909 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 DELAPIEDRA ALMA V 11815 FOOTHILL BLVD UT E, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 MCCARTHY MICHAEL JOHN 11837 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 ABSCO EI~rERPRISE INC 10075 ARROW RTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 ZAYER EVELYN ELIAS 11897 FOOTHILL SLVD D, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 ABSOLUTELY ITAUAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA INC 8153 ASPEN AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 N&L NILAR CORPORATION 8153 ASPEN AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 MMPACS LLC 11849 FOOTHILL BLVD UNIT A, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 BELLISSIMO PIZZA & PASTA INC 11849 FOOTHILL BLVD UNIT A, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 WABI ~ABI JAPANESE RESTAURANT LLC 11837 FOOTHILL BLVD B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CHIPOTLE IF~D(ICAN GRILL INC 10811 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 I~LANDS RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 11425 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 9625 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 LEYVA LUlS ENRIQUE 9339 FOOTHILL BLVD UT I, RANCHO CUCAMONOA CA 91730 PARK SUN YOUNG 9319 FOOTHILL SLVD E, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 SHAATH GLOBAL GROUP INC 11669 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 ALCHEHAYED MANSOUR 9465 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 PEI VVEI ASIAN DINER INC 8220 HAVEN AVE STE 100, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 90'd ~£S0 ~& 606 ~D ~0 3±~1S &£:0~ S00~-8~-~ ~/~ S0' d ]U/O/ CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WITH ADDRESS WHERE COUNTY IS 36-SAN BERNARDINO AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0021. PAGE: 5 Census License Licensee Tract Types Status Num Premises 0021. 47 PEIn) 404913 0021. 41 PEM3 409174 0021. 41 ACT 409581 0021. 41 ACT 411185 0021. 20 ACT 412408 0021. 47 ~ 412522 0021. 20 ACT 417315 0021. 47 ACT 418635 0021. 41 PEND 419880 0021. 21 PE~D 418502 0021. 20 ~ 425374 UM CHANG WHE 11260 FOURTH ST, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91761 PASTA POMODORO INC 8220 HAVEN AVE STE 101, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 GN RBPIZZA INC 10455 FOOTHILL BLVD S'rE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 FIE ENTERPRISES INC 8140 HAVEN AVE STE 101, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 CHEVRON STA]3ONS INC 8801 FOOTHILL BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 BJS RESTAURANTS INC FOURTH ST & RICHMOND PL NWC, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 SEARS GRAND LLC 8250 DAY CREEK BLVD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 SUNSET WINGS L-PSHIP 8188 DAY CREEK BLVD 140, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 JOSES MEXICAN FOOD INC 11226 FOURTH ST, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 LEE SEONG JIN 9849 FOOTHILL BLVO M, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 7 ELEVEN INC SIXTH ST & HAVEN AVE NVVC, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 RESOLUTION NO. 05- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2005-00360 FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND AN ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE, LOCATED AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-301-16. A. Recitals. 1. Han Maeum Market filed an application for Public Convenience and Necessity DRC2005-00360, as described in the title of this Resolution, for a Type 21 (off-sale) license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination that the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 1st day of June 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on June 1, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. A retailer of alcoholic beverages, specialty foods, and other related items is a common and accepted business; and b. The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue; Foothill Boulevard is designated as a major thoroughfare, and the site is suited for this type of business; and c. The census tract in which the site is located (0021) is very large, essentially encompassing all land south of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. This census tract also includes the Ontario Mills shopping center in the City of Ontario, which has a large number of restaurants with alcohol licenses. The Ontario Mills shopping center is physically separated from the majority of residential neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga by an industrial district; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 04- DRC2005-00339 - HAN MAEUM MARKET June 1,2005 Page 2 d. The site is not close to sensitive users, such as day care facilities, schools, and/or churches. The nearest school, Central Elementary, is located 1,200 feet away on Archibald Avenue, one block north of Foothill Boulevard; and e. Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient shopping opportunities with the addition of alcoholic beverages to the markets current selection of Asian food products. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Han Maeum Market will not have a negative impact to the surrounding uses. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby determines that the issuance of an off-sale liquor license for Hah Maeum Market will service the Public Convenience and Necessity. 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. TH E CITY OF I~AN CII 0 C U CAM 0 NGA SlaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council approve the attached fiscal year 2004~05 budgetary adjustments for all City funds. BACKGROUND When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated appropriations fourteen to sixteen months ahead of anticipated needs. In general, the attached schedules adjust estimated expenditures to reflect a more current snapshot in all funds. Funding for items included in the adopted budget are increased or decreased to reflect more recent experience. Adjustments have been made for the reallocation of resources when a particular line item has not been fully expended and is utilized for another area of operations. Also included in the adjusted figures are two additional items: 1) funding for purchase orders that were originally budgeted but were carried over from fiscal year 2003/04; and 2) funding for various expenditures approved by the City Council during the course of the current fiscal year. Carryover Purchase Orders. At the end of each fiscal year, there are a varying number of financial commitments outstanding, due primarily to timing issues, which are recorded in the City's financial records as purchase orders. A portion of the City's reserves is procedurally set aside each year for funding these commitments in the subsequent fiscal year. Although the initial budget appropriation for these purchase orders was approved in the prior fiscal year, the outstanding commitment carries over into the current fiscal year and must be funded in the current year's Amended Budget out of reserves. Generally, these outstanding commitments are for capital projects or contract services that are completed subsequent to the fiscal year in which they were approved. Total carryover purchase orders for the City's General Fund amounted to approximately $772,520. i:~financelbudget2OO51City Council staff reports~staff report-amended budget-City-04-05, doc City Council Approved Changes. During the course any fiscal year, the City Council approves appropriation changes for items not anticipated during the budget preparation process, including emergency repairs. Annually, the City Council (Council) adopts the amended appropriations. There has been no shift of estimated expenditures which deviates from the direction the Council has requested of staff. Capital improvement programs, as they are addressed, ara approved as separate Council items throughout the year. The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year's budgeted revenues and expenditures, the current year's (2004/05) adopted budget amounts, and the 2004/05 amended budget amounts in each account area. Respectfully submitted, Tamara L. Layne Finance Officer Attachments -2- City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year 2004/05 Budget REVENUES Fund/Description CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND 2003/04 Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Amended Budget Budget 001 GENERAL FUND 003 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT 006 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS 008 CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS 016 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND 025 CAPITAL RESERVE 073 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY 100 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN 101 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 105 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 110 BEAUTIFICATION 112 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL 114 DRAINAGE-ETIWANDPdSAN SEVAINE 116 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 120 PARK DEVELOPMENT 122 SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 124 TRANSPORTATION 126 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE 130 LMD #1 GENERAL CITY 131 LMD #2 VICTORIA 132 LMD #3A HYSSOP 133 LMD #3B MEDIANS 134 LMD #4 TERRA VISTA 135 LMD #5 TOT LOT 136 LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY 137 LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 138 LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 139 LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA 140 LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA 151 SLD #1 ARTERIAL 152 SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL 153 SLD #3 VICTORIA 154 SLD ;?4 TERRA VISTA 155 SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY 156 SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA 157 SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 158 SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 170 GAS TAX 2105/PROPI 11 172 GAS TAX 2106-2107 176 MEASURE "I" 180 SB 325 182 AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF 184 CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGKAM 186 FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS 204 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT 205 CDBG - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 208 TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 214 PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 44,813,450 47,485,280 54,957,840 15,000 15,000 15,000 54,750 55,770 96,200 78,840 82,860 84,220 398,400 334,600 831,560 2,088,000 2,370,580 3,059,200 200,000 200,000 330,000 673,960 652,810 724,370 251,320 0 250,560 189,240 157,240 156,630 5,600,950 4,846,880 2,603,600 3,967,780 2,451,700 4,298,520 150,700 607,480 4,307,480 51,070 33,540 351,530 6,839,510 4,014,600 5,715,780 280 280 280 12,480,460 13,468,180 13,767,620 188,740 124,420 146,490 1,232,760 1,523,120 1,526,760 2,573,470 2,851,200 2,902,420 4,890 4,890 4,720 948,850 1,009,430 1,083,440 1,602,950 1,783,790 1,807,000 7,400 21,660 21,110 433,850 461,220 461,920 637,930 684,920 698,370 31,340 56,780 56,780 463,720 517,170 526,330 361,950 378,620 363,860 605,050 631,670 647,370 292,230 334,100 334,100 260,060 267,800 283,320 182,130 149,400 148,830 65,800 65,410 65,410 116,750 116,840 121,530 68,630 65,620 65,320 255,300 291,710 292,610 805,110 1,355,080 1,364,430 2,275,030 1,923,460 1,951,010 3,218,410 2,743,950 2,722,370 2,180 107,000 107,000 211,290 5,740 500 100,000 100,000 0 51,880 53,260 56,720 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,430,760 0 0 500,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 16,000 4,000 7,920 Fund/Description CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND 2003/04 Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Amended Budget Budget 216 PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND 225 CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT 226 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 230 REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV 232 SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT 234 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 236 PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT 237 PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL 238 PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP 239 FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DREIER 240 MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION 244 CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM 250 RECREATION SERVICES 252 YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT 258 SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT 290 LIBRARY FUND 298 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 308 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT 310 PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 352 COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL 354 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE 365 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 368 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 369 COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT 370 OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT 371 OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT 372 OTS 2005 STATE SEAT BELT GRANT 380 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT 382 COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT 384 OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT 388 PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION GRANT 600 AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL 602 AD 84-1 DAY CREEIUMELLO 604 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL 606 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT 612 CFD 2001-01 614 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND 615 CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER 700 SPORTS COMPLEX 705 MUNICIPAL UTILITY 712 EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 714 COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND 801 AD 82-1R RESERVE FUND 805 CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND 812 CFD 88-2 ETlWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT 813 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDAfHIGHLND IMPR 815 CFD 88-2 POLICE 838 AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON 930 930 930 38,660 38,660 61,590 42,270 42,270 55,950 0 0 313,720 100,000 0 0 199,990 18,700 19,000 1,500,000 0 341,590 10,000,000 4,667,500 5,328,430 1,000,000 0 839,440 50,000 0 854,740 2,000,000 0 0 0 102,850 130,270 2,033,860 2,488,980 2,486,100 315,400 0 24,940 1,000 1,000 0 1,816,180 1,873,990 2,826,280 50,020 47,210 48,430 26,870 26,180 26,520 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 125,000 0 0 120,900 220,870 291,380 2,320 0 0 0 50,770 109,540 160,000 120,000 203,830 0 8,580 8,580 0 0 125,260 0 0 30,150 0 114,990 141,430 0 140,510 155,980 0 0 23,960 0 0 21,750 166,440 166,000 3,750 29,000 15,000 24,500 21,520 3,510 3,510 53,390 53,340 53,340 257,000 445,300 5,638,000 14,073,100 230,000 6,467,000 5,814,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 1,446,960 1,455,080 1,449,950 0 5,955,840 8,794,660 450,000 350,000 393,880 504,410 176,550 388,250 3,380 0 0 1,861,390 1,825,450 1,795,940 314,410 290,530 296,540 106,170 59,000 72,000 800 710 800 36,050 62,280 63,780 Fund/Description CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND 2003/04 Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Amended Budget Budget 841 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER 842 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 848 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND 850 PD 85 RESERVE FLrND 852 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN 854 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION 856 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP 860 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION 861 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE 862 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION 863 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE 864 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN 865 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE 866 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN 867 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 0 251,770 252,450 432,390 445,360 432,390 2,000,240 2,013,890 2,030,950 54,000 31,500 901,850 167,250 135,580 137,860 539,550 540,590 541,330 553,680 544,790 546,720 1,136,900 1,142,480 1,242,920 22,000 22,000 22,000 86,200 84,420 86,170 2,500 2,500 2,500 1,379,220 1,020,140 1,070,040 1,535,610 30,110 30,110 271,000 191,280 193,930 299,370 5,870 5,870 150,089,160 134,135,870 171,945,590 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget GENERAL FUND (001) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4102 - Property Taxcs-CY Unsecured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4105 - Property Taxes-Supplemental 4106 - ProperVy Taxes-Unitary 4107 - Property Transfer Tax 4120 - Sales and Use Tax 4121 - Prop 172-Half Cent Sales Tax 4122 - Sales Tax In-Lieu (Triple Flp) 4125 - Transient Occupancy Tax 4130 - Franchise Fee-Gas & Electric 4131 - Franchise Fee-Resid. Refuse 4132 - Franchise Fee-Comm. Refuse 4133 - Franchise Fee-Cable 4201 - Business Licenses 4202 - Bicycle License 4207 - Building Permits 4220 - Other Licenses & Permits 4301 - Vehicle Code Fines 4302 - Parking Citations 4306 - Vehicle Release Fees 4307 - Citation Proof of Corr Fees 4308 - General Ordinance Fines 4309 - False Alarm Fees 4310 - Loud Party Ordinance Fines 4311 - Booking Fees Reimbursement 4314 - Red Light Fines 4401 - Interest Earnings 4419 - Other Rental/Lease Income 4440 - Sale of Fixed Assets 4501 - Plan Check Fees 4507 - Building & Safety-Special Serv 4508 - Planning Fees 4509 - Planning- Special Services Fee 4510 - Engineering Fees 4511 - Engineering - Special Services 4519 - Information Technology Revenue 4525 - Emergency Prep Spec Prog Fees 4560 - Fingerprint Fees 4563 - Candidates Filing Fees 4564 - Returned Item Charge 4565 - Passport Processing Fees 4567 - Passport Photo Fees 4570 - Sale of Printed Materials 4701 - Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Fees 4702 - Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF 4705 - Off-Highway License Fees 4710 - Homeowners Property Tax Relief 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 1,880,490 1,745,070 2,117,220 112,910 110,220 109,870 104,330 113,240 116,350 88,330 105,250 138,350 75,630 64,390 259,960 118,150 117,750 122,190 730,540 762,390 1,538,130 14,626,000 17,113,130 14,917,170 299,500 328,370 357,660 0 0 4,052,830 206,690 252,540 233,080 2,423,180 2,211,250 2,368,000 1,173,370 1,260,140 1,180,600 1,309,000 1,540,040 1,559,950 889,260 981,660 1,008,930 1,700,000 1,730,600 1,850,000 90 180 90 2,676,200 2,488,000 2,788,000 80,000 70,000 70,000 300,000 350,000 335,520 114,000 114,000 91,240 115,000 120,000 154,670 800 870 1,460 72,180 62,080 93,990 12,000 25,000 33,410 700 700 350 0 0 1,920 442,500 151,760 159,530 500,000 504,000 538,790 68,830 52,360 70,320 30,000 30,000 28,270 1,640,000 1,617,000 1,617,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 50,000 300,000 300,000 1,209,680 1,292,100 1,457,000 50,000 100,000 60,000 0 0 125,500 15,000 15,000 0 10,000 10,000 40,000 0 12,000 6,150 460 750 550 25,000 50,000 40,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 110,000 115,000 100,500 8,582,310 8,445,520 1,973,520 0 0 8,607,970 3,700 4,950 5,760 69,220 73,050 71,890 13,500 15,450 892,630 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4901 - Other Revenue 4905 - Contributions/Fund Raising 4910 - DARE Program Reimbursement 4911 - Reimbursement from Other Funds 4914 - Nun-Abated Reimbursements 8705 - Transfer In-Municipal Utility 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 001: 6,000 6,000 408,050 15,000 15,000 15,000 140,180 0 0 1,735,190 2,060,470 1,990,470 5,000 50,000 50,000 0 75,000 75,000 161,530 0 0 44,813,450 47,485,280 54,957,840 REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003) 4303 - Parking Cit Surcharge-State 4304 - Parking Cit Surchrge-Cnty Jail 4305 - Parking Cit Surcharge-Cnty Crt Total For Fund 003: 6,000 6,000 6,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 54,750 54,750 95,200 0 0 1,000 0 1,020 0 54,750 55,770 96,200 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006) 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 006: CAL TRAINS REIMBURSEMENTS (007) CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008) 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursenmt 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 008: 78,840 78,840 82,000 0 0 240 0 4,020 lt980 78,840 82,860 84,220 COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND (016) 4401 - Interest Eanfmgs 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 016: 15,000 15,000 49,290 383~400 319,600 782,270 398,400 334,600 831,560 CAPITAL RESERVE (025) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4740 - Grant Income 4911 - Reimbursement from Other Funds 4914 - Nun-Abated Reimbursements 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 025: 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,388,620 0 0 16,580 588,000 588,000 588,000 0 0 426,630 0 282,580 639,370 2,088,000 2,370,580 3,059,200 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073) 4401 - Interest Earnings 94,080 94,080 142,630 ..4'3 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 073: ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund Total For Fund 100: AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 101: 105,920 105,920 187,370 200,000 200,000 330,000 9,330 2,000 20,000 664,630 650,810 691,290 0 0 13,080 673,960 652,810 724,370 242,820 0 0 8,500 0 0 0 0 250,560 251,320 0 250,560 AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4740 - Grant Income 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 105: BEAUTIFICATION (110) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4740 - Grant Income 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 4801 - Beautification Fees 4809 - In Lieu Fees 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 110: DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 4806 - Storm Drain Fees 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 112: DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE (114) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4807 - Secondary Regional Fee 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 800 800 800 153,570 153,570 153,570 0 0 650 34,870 2,870 1,610 189,240 157,240 156,630 66,110 66,110 66,110 3,522,810 3,522,810 0 0 0 168,470 377,000 283,840 903,600 0 0 65,000 0 0 160 1,635~030 974,120 1,400,260 5,600,950 4,846,880 2,603,600 121,060 121,060 121,060 0 0 2,030,340 654,450 888,550 1,430,320 3,192,270 1,442~090 716,800 3,967,780 2,451,700 4,298,520 64,990 64,990 64,990 85,710 49,860 320,770 0 492,630 3,921,720 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 114: 150,700 607,480 4,307,480 11,070 11,070 11,070 40,000 22,470 340,460 51,070 33,540 351,530 145,480 145,480 145,480 766,820 877,250 974,070 0 0 2,550 5,927,210 2,991,870 4,593,680 6,839,510 4,014,600 5,715,780 280 280 280 280 280 280 ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4807 - Secondary Regional Fee Total For Fund 116: PARK DEVELOPMENT (120) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4800 - Park Development Fees 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 120: SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (122) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 122: TRANSPORTATION (124) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4740 - Grant Income 4804 - Transportation Fee/Backbone 4805 - Transportation Fee/EV Preemptn 4809 - In Lieu Fees 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 124: LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4806 - Storm Drain Fees 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 126: LMD #1 GENERAL CITY (130) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance 288,000 288,000 288,000 0 800,000 800,000 2,039,700 2,123,530 4,585,700 20,600 0 46,320 0 0 27,460 0 0 27,840 10,132,160 10,256,650 7,992,300 12,480,460 13,468,180 13,767,620 19,910 19,910 19,910 168,830 0 126,580 0 104,510 0 188,740 124,420 146,490 977,560 1,039,190 1,057,430 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,500 3,000 3,000 52,690 26,000 26,000 650 10,000 10,000 0 0 3,390 176,360 429,930 411,940 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 130: 1,232,760 1,523,120 1,526,760 LMD #2 VICTORIA (131) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 131: 2,113,720 2,258,220 2,302,850 40,000 40,000 40,000 2,500 7,250 7,250 82,680 42,000 42,000 0 10,500 0 0 0 24,060 334,570 493,230 486,260 2,573,470 2,851,200 2,902,420 3,310 3,310 3,720 1,580 1,580 1,000 4,890 4,890 4,720 LMD #3A HYSSOP (132) 4101 - Proper~ Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 132: LMD #3B MEDIANS (133) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 ~ Interest Earnings 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 133: 733,540 778,640 839,730 15,000 10,500 5,500 2,500 1,250 1,000 56,380 27,500 27,500 0 1,500 500 0 0 6,310 141,430 190z040 202,900 948,850 1,009,430 1,083,440 LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 134: 1,379,910 1,482,550 1,483,080 15,000 15,000 12,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 85,720 37,500 37,500 0 0 23,610 119,820 246,240 248,310 1,602,950 1,783,790 1,807,000 LMD #5 TOT LOT (135) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 135: 4,630 4,580 4,580 100 200 100 20 50 20 2,650 1,300 1,300 0 15,530 15,110 7,400 21,660 21,110 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 136: LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4419 - Other Rental/Lease Income 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 137: LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Propei~y Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 138: LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8001 - Transfer In-General Ftmd Total For Fund 139: LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA (140) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Eammgs 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund Total For Fund 140: SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 292,610 302,050 302,050 4,270 5,250 6,500 700 830 1,250 24,270 11,000 11,000 0 0 710 112,000 142~090 140,410 433,850 461,220 461,920 442,030 470,460 470,460 9,000 12,250 9,500 2,810 2,810 2,810 40,060 50,060 25,000 0 0 18,930 0 5,330 0 0 0 4,950 144,030 144,010 166,720 637,930 684,920 698,370 21,080 25,200 25,200 760 350 350 90 90 90 3,250 3,250 3,250 6~160 27,890 27,890 31,340 56,780 56,780 454,410 506,610 506,610 1,500 2,500 7,000 150 400 1,000 7,660 7,660 11,500 0 0 220 463,720 517,170 526,330 359,450 374,970 359,450 2,500 3,650 3,650 0 0 760 361,950 378,620 363,860 570,190 609,620 625,320 .5'7 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee Total For Fund 151: SLD 6{2 RESIDENTIAL (152) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 152: SLD #3 VICTORIA (153) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 153: SLD//4 TERRA VISTA (154) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee Total For Fund 154: SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 155: SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Propexty Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Propen'y Taxes-Penalties/int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 7,500 7,500 7,500 1,750 1,750 1,750 22,810 10,000 10,000 2,800 2,800 2,800 605,050 631,670 647,370 · 260,460 272,050 294,550 6,000 4,500 4,500 1,450 1,000 · 1,000 9,050 1,000 100 500 750 1,500 14,770 54z800 32,450 292,230 334,100 334,100 233,990 250,050 266,820 5,950 4,500 4,500 1,180 900 900 15,470 9,600 9,600 2,640 2,750 1,500 830 0 0 260,060 267,800 283,320 160,590 135,020 135,100 1,850 1,850 1,850 380 380 380 19,310 11,500 11,500 0 650 0 182,130 149,400 148,830 40,990 41,880 41,880 1,110 1,110 1,110 220 220 220 5,570 2,500 2,500 17,910 19,700 19,700 65,800 65,410 65,410 102,090 108,730 112,580 1,550 1,550 650 310 310 150 10,800 5,600 7,500 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee Total For Fund 156: SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 - Developer Energizing Fee Total For Fund 157: SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4808 ~ Developer Energizing Fee Total For Fund 158: GAS TAX 2105/PROPlll (170) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4720 - Gas Tax 2105-Prop 111 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 170: GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4721 - State Gas Tax-2106 4722 - State Gas Tax-2107 4723 - State Gas Tax-2107.5 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 172: MEASURE "I" (176) 4401 - Interest Earmngs 4715 - Measure I Local St Allotment 4745 - Other Intergov'tl Reimbursemnt 8001 - Transfer In-Genera/Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 176: 2,000 650 650 116,750 116,840 121,530 54,400 59,140 58,320 1,380 1,380 900 280 350 200 6,570 4,500 5,500 6,000 250 400 68,630 65,620 65,320 246,320 282,160 280,260 650 1,500 4,000 150 250 650 6,180 4,800 7,700 2~000 3,000 0 255,300 291,710 292,610 21,470 21,470 21,470 738,000 857,600 840,740 0 0 8,640 45t640 476~010 493~580 805,110 1,355,080 1,364,430 13,970 13,970 13,970 465,770 535,080 523,160 1,049,230 1,040,000 1,111,710 10,000 10,000 10,000 . 0 0 31,110 736,060 324,410 261,060 2,275,030 1,923,460 1,951,010 113,370 113,370 113,370 1,236,170 1,393,650 1,516,280 0 0 40,000 0 0 3,950 1,868,870 1,236,930 1,048,770 3,218,410 2,743,950 2,722,370 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget SB 325 (180) Total For Fund 180: 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 182: CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (184) 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 184: FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186) 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 186: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204) 4740 - Grant Income 4741 - Program Income 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund Total For Fund 204: CDBG - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (205) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 205: TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208) 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 208: PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214) 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 214: PROP 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND (216) 2,180 2,180 2,180 0 104,820 104,820 2,180 107,000 107,000 5,740 5,740 500 205,550 0 0 211,290 5,740 500 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 650 51,880 53,260 56,070 51,880 53,260 56,720 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,411,110 0 0 10,600 0 0 9,050 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,430,760 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 16,000 4,000 4,000 0 0 3,920 16,000 4,000 7,920 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 216: CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225) 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 225: USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226) 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 226: REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV (230) 8124 - Transfer In-Transportation Fd Total For Fund 230: SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232) 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 232: SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 234: PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 236: PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL (237) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 237: PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 238: FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DREIER (239) 930 930 930 930 930 930 36,120 38,650 40,700 2,540 I0 20,890 38,660 38,660 61,590 42,000 42,000 36,800 270 270 19,150 42,270 42,270 55,950 0 0 313,720 0 0 313,720 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 199,990 0 0 0 18,700 19,000 199,990 18,700 19,000 1,500,000 0 341,590 1,500,000 0 341,590 10z000~000 4~667~500 5~328~430 10,000,000 4,667,500 5,328,430 1,000~000 0 839,440 1,000,000 0 839,440 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 239: MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 240: CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 244: RECREATION SERVICES (250) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4520 - Recreation Fees 4571 - Sale of Taxable Items 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 250: YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252) 4740 - Grant Income 4741 - Program Income Total For Fund 252: SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 258: TEEN AFTER SCHOOL PROG GRANT (260) TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE (266) TARGET LITERACY GRANT (268) LIBRARY FUND (290) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4102 - Property Taxes-CY Unsecured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4105 - Property Taxes-Supplemental 4312 - Library Fines and Fees 4401 - Interest Earnings 4410 - Media Rentals 4512 - Library Card & Merchndse Sales 4514 - Technology Center Revenue 50,000 0 804,740 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 854,740 2~000,000 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 102,850 130,270 0 102,850 130,270 20,920 19,000 19,000 1,915,000 2,343,600 2,272,590 750 0 0 0 0 42,160 97,190 126,380 152,350 2,033,860 2,488,980 2,486,100 308,800 0 24,940 6,600 0 0 315,400 0 24,940 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,287,560 1,380,960 2,017,220 48,000 55,670 63,150 44,500 57,200 72,230 32,000 53,160 152,960 118,000 120,000 142,140 15,000 18,000 39,420 88,000 95,000 82,000 0 0 50 8,000 8,000 8,000 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 290: 4515 - Information Service Fees 4570 - Sale of Printed Materials 4740 - Grunt Income 4906 - CLSA Direct Loan 4907 - Private Contributions Library 4908 - Public Library Foundation 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT (294) CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298) 4740 - Grant Income 4909 - RC Library Foundation Support 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8290 - Transfer In-Library Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 298: LIBRARY SERVICES & TECH. ACT (302) FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308) 4740 - Grant Income 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8290 - Transfer In-Library Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 308: PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310) 4740 - Grunt Income Total For Fund 310: COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL (352) 4740 - Grunt Income Total For Fund 352: 1,500 1,500 1,500 5,000 4,500 4,500 0 0 6,000 0 0 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 0 62,280 38,620 0 34,830 50,000 0 0 1,816,180 1,873,990 2,826,280 5,000 26,400 26,400 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 1,160 35,020 1,400 1,400 0 9~410 9,470 50,020 47,210 48,430 13,000 0 0 0 0 730 13,870 12,470 12,470 0 13~710 13,320 26,870 26,180 26,520 0 5,000~000 7,270,020 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 125,000 0 0 125,000 0 0 20,900 8,300 8,300 100,000 100,000 228,390 0 112,570 54,690 120,900 220,870 291,380 COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4740 - Grant Income 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balunce Total For Fund 354: LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 (365) 4401 - Interest Earnings 2,320 0 0 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 365: CA LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (366) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2001 (367) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368) 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 368: COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT (369) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 369: OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT (370) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 370: OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT (371) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 371: OTS 2005 STATE SEAT BELT GRANT (372) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 372: DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 380: COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 382: OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT (384) 4740 - Grant Income Total For Fund 384: PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION GRANT (388) 4740 - Grant Income 2,320 0 0 0 50,770 109,540 0 50,770 109,540 160~000 120~000 203~830 160,000 120,000 203,830 0 8,580 8,580 0 8,580 8,580 0 0 125,260 0 0 125,260 0 0 30,150 0 0 30,150 0 1141990 141,430 0 114,990 141,430 0 140,510 155,980 0 140,510 155,980 0 0 23~960 0 0 23,960 0 0 21,750 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 388: 0 0 21,750 AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL (600) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 600: AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 602: AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 604: 2,000 0 3,750 164,440 166,000 0 166,440 166,000 3,750 29,000 15,000 24,500 29,000 15,000 24,500 500 100 60 21~020 3,410 3,450 21,520 3,510 3,510 1,000 0 260 52,390 53,340 53~080 53,390 53,340 53,340 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 606: CFD2001-01 (612) Total For Fund 612: 4401 - Interest Earnings 4930 - Advances from Other Funds 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 4930 - Advances from Other Funds 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 614: CFD 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER (615) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 615: SPORTS COMPLEX (700) 100,000 100,000 100,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 lOOlO00 288,300 5,481,000 257,000 445,300 5,638,000 183,820 183,820 183,820 8,706,310 0 0 2,458,720 0 0 2t724,250 46,180 6,283,180 14,073,100 230,000 6,467,000 114,000 114,000 114,000 5,700,000 0 0 0 5,586~000 5,586,000 5,814,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 700: 4126 - Admissions Tax 4220 - Other Licenses & Permits 4411 - Special Event Rental 4425 - Stadium Lease-Parking Lt Reimb 4426 - Stadium Lease-Minimum Rent 4427 - Stadium Lease-Addt'l Rent (%) 4428 - Stadium Lease-Office Rent 4520 - Recreation Fees 4562 - Maintenance Fees 4573 - Concession Sales 4580 - Stadium Security Reimbursement 4582 - Special Events 4583 - Baseball Security Reimb. 4585 - Parking Fees-Sports Complex 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705) 4601 - Monthly Srvc Fee-Electxic Util 4602 - Commodity Fee-Electric Util. 4603 - New Srvc Activation Fee-Util. 4604 - Dist Line Ext Fee-Elec Utility 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8025 - Transfer In-Capital Rsrv Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 705: EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 712: COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4540 - Intragovermnental User Fees 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 714: AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND (800) AD 82-1R RESERVE FUND (801) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 801: 29,000 30,000 30,000 500 500 300 36,000 36,000 36,600 72,000 72,500 66,100 70,000 67,250 67,250 20,000 30,000 53,000 4,150 4,150 4,150 396,880 411,050 315,150 24,000 24,000 17,000 4,500 2,400 2,800 71,250 73,500 73,750 400 400 200 42,000 37,000 42,500 29,000 30,000 30,000 12,000 12,000 13,500 635,280 624,330 527,800 0 0 169,850 1,446,960 1,455,080 1,449,950 0 27,000 27,000 0 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 280,000 2,800 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 4,410 0 1,148,840 1,148,840 0 0 3,111,610 0 5,955,840 8,794,660 450,000 350,000 350,000 0 0 43,880 450,000 350,000 393,880 170,000 130,000 130,000 334,410 27,850 258,250 0 18,700 0 504,410 176,550 388,250 3~380 0 0 3,380 0 0 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4935 - Contributed Capital 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 805: 761,390 754,250 773,430 32,500 8,000 55,000 7,500 1,500 1,500 85,000 34,000 34,000 975,000 975,000 0 0 52,700 932,010 1,861,390 1,825,450 1,795,940 AD 84-2 REDEMPTION FUND (807) AD 86-2 REDEMPTION FUND (810) CFD 88-2 ETIWANDAfHIGHLND DEBT (812) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxcs-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 812: 262,280 263,280 263,240 5,500 5,500 5,500 1,250 1,750 2,300 45,380 20,000 25,500 314,410 290,530 296,540 106,170 59,000 72,000 106,170 59,000 72,000 100 10 100 700 700 700 800 710 800 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND IMPR (813) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 813: CFD 88-2 POLICE (815) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8812 - Transfer In-AD 88-2 Debt Srvc. Total For Fund 815: AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 838: 27,170 30,410 30,410 500 500 850 80 80 150 8,300 4,100 4,100 0 0 1,500 0 27,190 26,770 36,050 62,280 63,780 AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 841: 0 248,270 248,950 0 3~500 3~500 0 251,770 252,450 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842) Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 842: PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings 4901 - Other Revenue 8001 - Transfer In-General Fund 8850 ~ Transfer In-PD 85 Reserve Fund 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 848: PD 85 RESERVE FUND (850) 4401 - Interest Earnings 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 850: CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Proper~ Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Property Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 852: AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4103 - Property Taxes-PY Sec & Unsec 4104 - Proper0/Taxes-Penalties/Int. 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 854: CFI} 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 856: CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings 423,890 423,890 423,890 8,500 8,500 8,500 0 12,970 0 432,390 445,360 432,390 1,692,440 1,742,860 1,050,940 25,000 25,000 25,000 6,500 6,500 6,500 50,300 25,000 25,000 8,500 8,250 8,250 0 0 13,410 0 0 901,850 2177500 2061280 0 2,000,240 2,013,890 2,030,950 54,000 31,500 31,500 0 0 870,350 54,000 31,500 901,850 166,250 135,080 131,610 0 0 5,000 0 0 750 1~000 500 500 167,250 135,580 137,860 520,670 527,590 528,130 2,500 1,500 1,500 380 250 450 16,000 11,250 11,250 539,550 540,590 541,330 532,390 543,040 542,720 21,290 17750 4,000 553,680 544,790 546,720 0 1,132,480 1,241,920 0 10,000 1,000 Object CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 8999 - Transfer In From Fund Balance Total For Fund 860: CFD 2001-01 SERIES A RESERVE (861) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 861: CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 862: CFD 2001-01 SERIES B RESERVE (863) 4401 - Interest Earnings Total For Fund 863: CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds Total For Fund 864: CFD 2003-01 SERIES A RESERVE (865) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds Total For Fund 865: CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866) 4101 - Property Taxes-CY Secured 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds Total For Fund 866: CFD 2003-01 SERIES B RESERVE (867) 4401 - Interest Earnings 4921 - Long-Term Debt Proceeds Total For Fund 867: 1,136,900 0 0 1,136,900 1,142,480 1,242,920 22,000 22,000 22z000 22,000 22,000 22,000 85,450 83,920 83,920 750 500 2,250 86,200 84,420 86,170 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 1,000,140 1,069,040 0 .20,000 1,000 1~379,220 0 0 1,379,220 1,020,140 1,070,040 30,110 30,110 30,110 1,505z500 0 0 1,535,610 30,110 30,110 0 188,280 193,830 0 3,000 100 271~000 0 0 271,000 191,280 193,930 5,870 5,870 5,870 293,500 0 0 299,370 5,870 5,870 150,089,160 134,135,870 171,945,590 Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year 2004/05 Budget EXPENDITURES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Description GENERAL FUND (001) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 101 CITY COUNCIL 102 CITY MANAGEMENT 103 CITY CLERK 104 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 105 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 204 BUSINESS LICENSES 205 CITY FACILITIES 206 FINANCE 207 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM5 209 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTE~ 210 PERSONNEL 211 PURCHASING 212 RISK MANAGEMENT 213 TREASURY MANAGEMENT 302 BUILDING AND SAFETY 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 304 ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION MGT 305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 306 ENGINEERING - NPDES 307 ENGINEERING - PROJECT MGT 308 ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC MGT 312 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 313 INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. 314 PLANNING 315 PLANNING COMMISSION 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. 317 VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MAINT. 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO? 420 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION TOTAL FOR GENERAL FUND: 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 3,278,500 3,042,190 3,604,140 218,030 56,500 392,090 90,850 89,390 100,420 801,140 829,000 861,310 371,430 414,560 461,300 452,250 435,700 463,240 122,090 43,340 29,860 377,170 400,620 417,190 209,380 219,800 229,870 1,485,860 1,558,660 1,560,000 604,650 638,790 663,410 304,890 316,870 303,150 1,938,140 1,663,730 2,622,590 291,270 310,340 376,800 340,890 370,600 369,010 167,220 169,830 159,720 3,640 3,680 3,690 4,142,290 3,876,990 4,038,630 332,760 342,990 364,420 825,700 0 0 1,186,290 1,790,840 2,350,040 492,720 536,870 567,840 144,280 466,940 3,064,950 220,710 233,000 252,370 1,903,950 2,454,820 2,604,960 624,310 630,380 661,400 1,749,700 1,988,700 2,043,160 9,570 8,840 8,920 3,648,130 3,502,740 4,344,370 854,740 898,330 1,017,100 2,337,520 2,642,680 2,640,200 2,730 1,530 1,530 15,280,650 17,546,030 16,799,680 44,813,450 47,485,280 53,377,360 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Descr!ption REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND (016) 301 COMMUNITY DEV-ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL RESERVE (025) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073) 002 NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105) 208 GRANT MANAGEMENT (AQMD) BEAUTIFICATION (110) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA]SAN SEVAINE (114) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION PARK DEVELOPMENT (120) 305 ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT TRANSPORTATION (124) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #1 GENERAL CITY (130) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #2 VICTORIA (131) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #3A HYSSOP (132) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #3B MEDIANS (133) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #5 TOT LOT (135) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138) 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 15,000 15,000 15,000 54,750 55,770 89,450 78,840 82,860 84,220 398,400 334,600 831,560 1,013,590 2,370,580 3,037,220 200,000 200,000 330,000 631,750 609,300 675,520 247,180 0 250,560 189,240 157,240 156,630 5,600,950 4,846,880 2,603,600 3,967,780 2,451,700 4,298,520 11,170 607,480 4,307,480 26,000 23,370 269,260 6,839,510 4,014,600 5,715,780 12,480,460 13,468,180 13,767,620 84,420 124,420 0 1,232,760 1,523,120 1,526,760 2,573,470 2,851,200 2,902,420 3,870 3,810 3,810 948,850 1,009,430 1,083,440 1,602,950 1,783,790 1,807,000 5,360 21,660 21,110 433,850 461,220 461,920 637,930 684,920 698,370 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Description 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION LMD #10 RANCHO ETIWANDA (140) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL (152) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #3 VICTORIA (153) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #4 TERRA VISTA (154) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #7 NORTH ETI~VANDA (157) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION GAS TAX 2105/PROPlll (170) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION MEASURE "I" (176) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SB 325 (180) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (184) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186) 316 STREET AND PARK MAINT. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204) 314 PLANNING CDBG - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (205) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 31,340 56,780 56,780 101,650 87,170 88,010 226,670 252,680 260,440 594,040 598,190 598,190 292,230 334,100 334,100 260,060 260,840 260,840 149,030 146,680 146,680 65,800 65,410 65,410 107,080 106,930 106,930 30,070 29,850 29,850 26,610 29,120 29,120 805,110 1,349,060 1,364,430 2,275,030 1,911,390 1,951,010 3,218,410 2,743,950 2,722,370 0 107,000 107,000 211,290 0 0 100,000 0 0 51,880 53,260 56,720 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,430,760 0 0 500,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 16,000 4,000 7,920 38,660 38,660 61,590 42,270 42,270 55,950 100,000 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Description SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 303 ENGINEEKING - ADMINISTRATION PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL (237) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DREIER (239) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244) 302 BUILDING AND SAFETY RECREATION SERVICES (250) 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATIO~ YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252) 401 COMMtBx~TY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~ SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258) 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~ LIBRARY FUND (290) 601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 603 AFTER SCHOOL LEARNING PROGRAM 604 BOOKMOBILE SERVICES 605 LIBKARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOTAL FOR LIBRARY FUND: CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298) 601 LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308) 602 GRANT MANAGEMENT PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310) 602 GRANT MANAGEMENT COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT (369) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION OTS-"DRINK~DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT (370) 702 GRANT MANAGEMENT OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT (371) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION OTS 2005 STATE SEAT BELT GRANT (372) 701 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382) 105 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 0 18,700 19,000 1,500,000 0 341,590 10,000,000 0 5,328,430 1,000,000 0 839,440 50,000 0 854,740 2,000,000 0 0 0 102,850 130,270 2,033,860 2,488,980 2,486,100 309,960 0 7,040 990 990 0 1,693,320 1,756,500 2,679,780 24,860 26,290 26,960 96,150 89,220 94,050 1,850 1,980 1,980 1,816,180 1,873,990 2,802,770 44,980 47,210 48,430 25,720 26,180 26,520 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 0 220,870 291,380 0 50,770 109,540 160,000 120,000 203,830 0 8,580 8,580 0 0 125,260 0 0 30,150 0 114,990 141,430 0 140,510 155,980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Description OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT (384) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION GRANT (388) 501 FIRE ADMINISTRATION AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL (600) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFD 2001-01 (612) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFI) 2003-01 CULTURAL CENTER (615) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES (617) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFD 2004-02 RANCHO SUMMIT (618) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION SPORTS COMPLEX (700) 201 ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 401 COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATIO~ TOTAL FOR SPORTS COMPLEX: MUNICIPAL UTILITY (705) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714) 001 NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGItLND DEBT (812) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION PD 85 RESERVE FUND (850) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION CFI) 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852) 303 ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 0 0 23,960 0 0 21,750 166,440 166,000 0 2,000 0 0 21,520 3,510 3,510 53,390 53,340 53,340 257,000 445,300 5,638,000 11,333,850 230,000 6,467,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 0 0 105,160 0 0 122,250 1,052,400 1,064,700 1,120,210 390,940 390,380 329,740 1,443,340 1,455,080 1,449,950 0 5,955,840 8,794,660 314,900 255,500 393,880 211,770 176,550 363,000 1,827,060 1,825,450 1,795,940 290,320 286,470 264,260 35,570 62,280 63,780 0 251,520 248,480 421,070 445,360 407,180 2,000,240 2,013,890 2,030,950 0 0 901,850 191,810 124,200 123,600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY ENTITY, FUND, DIVISION Fund/Description Division/Description AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866) 203 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS TOTAL FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Budget Budget Budget 539,170 522,550 521,940 530,330. 540,630 540,890 1,136,900 1,132,480 1,137,110 85,450 84,420 91,690 1,379,220 1,002,840 489,420 271,000 188,280 68,530 142,009,220 128,051,810 167,905,290 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget GENERAL FUND (001) 001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 9186 9204 9250 9281 9282 9290 9298 9308 9700 9705 9838 9848 TotaI Division: 001 002 -NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5314 - Red Light Fines Administration 5410 - Property Insurance 5411 - Other Insurance 5416 - General Liability Insurance 5505 - Booking Fees 5510 - Property Tax Admin. Fee 5599 - ERAF Payment to State of CA 9006 - Transfer Out-Fund 006 9008 - Transfer Out-Fund 008 9100 - Transfer Out-Assess Dist Admin 9105 - Transfer Out-Fund 105 9110 - Transfer Out-Fund 110 9120 - Transfer Out-Fund 120 9124 - Transfer Out-Transportation 9130 - Transfer Out-Fund 130 9131 - Transfer Out-Fund 131 9133 - Transfer Out-Fund 133 9134 - Transfer Out-Fund 134 9136 - Transfer Out-Fund 136 9137 - Transfer Out-Fund 137 9139 - Transfer Out-Fund 139 9140 ~ Transfer Out-Fund 140 9170 - Transfer Out-Fund 170 9172 - Transfer Out-Fund 172 9176 - Transfer Out-Measure "I'' - Transfer Out-Fund 186 Transfer Out-Fund 204 Transfer Out-Recreation Srvcs Transfer Out-Fire Fund Transfer Out-CFD 85-1 Transfer Out-Libra13, Fund Transfer Out-CA Literacy Cmpgn Transfer Out-Families for Lit. Transfer Out-Sports Complex Transfer Out-Municipal Utility Transfer Out-Fund 838 Transfer Out-Fund 848 0 0 2,180 0 0 2,360 29,500 19,000 35,330 25,800 25,800 25,800 58,100 50,100 52,600 26,000 23,000 23,000 553,300 607,900 735,310 363,000 406,080 391,080 72,970 126,820 81,500 1,440 2,690 3,000 64,440 72,930 80,090 420,000 480,000 548,800 64,670 67,900 76,000 0 0 679,310 0 0 1,000 0 0 240 0 0 13,080 0 0 650 0 0 160 0 0 2,550 0 0 27,840 0 0 3,390 0 0 24,060 0 0 6,310 0 0 23,610 0 0 710 0 0 4,950 0 0 220 0 0 760 0 0 8,640 0 0 31,110 0 0 3,950 0 0 650 0 0 9,050 0 0 42,160 925,380 535,640 45,800 0 0 33,050 38,620 0 34,830 0 0 1,160 0 0 730 635,280 624,330 527,800 0 0 4,410 0 0 1,500 0 0 13,410 3,278,500 3,042,190 3,604,140 7'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004105 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 002 101 - CITY COUNCIL Total Division: I01 102 - CITY MANAGEMENT Total Division: 102 103 - CITY CLERK Total Division: 103 104 - ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 5040 - PARS 161,530 0 5053 - Workers' Compensation Claims 0 0 5060 - Tuition Reimbursement 10,000 10,000 5065 - Coffee Fund 2,000 2,000 5285 - Safety Gear & Equipment 25,000 25,000 5300 - Contract Services 19,500 19,500 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 ~ Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Sot%vare 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations &.Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5203 - O & IvFComplex Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 263,290 31,800 10,000 2,000 25,000 60,000 218,030 56,500 392,090 53,200 53,200 54,220 19,680 23,940 23,940 8,440 5,540 10,040 1,500 750 750 3,700 2,960 3,410 4,330 3,000 2,000 0 0 1,490 0 0 4,570 90,850 89,390 100,420 551,390 554,420 563,650 1,000 500 500 204,010 249,490 253,900 5,700 1,950 3,850 10,840 10,840 10,840 9,000 7,200 5,800 660 0 700 4,540 3,450 3,450 2,500 650 1,250 4,000 500 1,000 7,500 0 11,800 0 0 4,570 801,140 829,000 861,310 187,150 177,800 186,650 750 0 1,600 40,480 46,090 47,470 72,890 84,160 85,570 820 0 0 1,300 1,300 1,300 4,800 4,800 4,830 5,000 2,750 3,500 1,330 750 750 49,880 59,880 74,880 7,030 37,030 54,750 371,430 414,560 461,300 500 500 650 12,650 0 0 382,800 380,700 408,090 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 104 105 - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Total Division: 105 201 - ADMIN SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 201 204 - BUSINESS LICENSES Total Division: 204 205 ~ CITY FACILITIES 5304 - Contract Sere/Facilities 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5401 - Gas Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5205 - O & M/Reimbursable 5300 - Contract Services 5303 - Contract Sere/Reimbursable 5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Eqtfipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5151 - Postage 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5400 - Telephone Utilities 4,500 4,500 4,500 3,500 2,800 2,800 3,800 3,200 3,200 3,500 3,000 3,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 452,250 435,700 463,240 60,470 0 0 22,370 0 0 160 160 160 1,150 5,000 5,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 280 280 0 250 250 250 10,750 10,750 10,750 5,000 5,000 0 2,660 900 900 10,000 10,000 0 8,000 8,000 9,800 122,090 43,340 29,860 265,490 267,080 281,530 98,230 120,190 122,310 550 550 1,250 5,300 5,300 5,300 4,000 4,000 4,000 500 500 500 100 0 0 3,000 3,000 2,300 377,170 400,620 417,190 136,470 136,470 143,140 0 0 320 15,540 15,540 16,010 51,890 62,810 63,890 100 100 0 2,000 2,000 1,950 100 100 0 3,000 2,500 2,480 280 280 390 0 0 1,690 209,380 219,800 229,870 55,000 55,000 50,000 0 100,930 71,960 106,260 5,330 12,750 293,100 293,900 299,790 334,000 346,000 346,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 205 206 - FINANCE 5401 - Gas Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contxact Services Total Division: 206 207 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 207 209 - MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contxact Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip Total Division: 209 210 - PERSONNEL 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 50,000 52,500 52,500 30,000 32,000 32,000 617,500 673,000 673,000 0 0 22,000 1,485,860 1,558,660 1,560,000 403,520 405,140 424,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 16,690 16,690 19,000 150,800 183,810 187,030 1,600 1,600 2,000 600 600 1,440 4,900 4,900 4,900 8,000 8,000 8,000 1,230 1,200 1,200 880 950 1,140 9,430 8,900 7,900 5,500 5,500 5,300 604,650 638,790 663,410 186,280 189,090 169,100 68,920 85,090 86,590 3,500 3,500 3,690 3,500 2,000 1,500 2,000 2,000 8,500 330 190 190 17,000 15,000 9,820 23,360 20,000 23,760 304,890 316,870 303,150 679,100 681,850 694,440 11,730 11,730 33,660 251,270 306,830 312,250 5,180 4,390 4,390 5,220 5,220 5,220 7,500 7,500 7,500 102,220 99,720 160,490 1,010 1,010 1,010 500 500 500 39,000 39,0~0 129,800 300,930 0 241,410 534,480 505,980 752,350 0 0 279,570 1,938,140 1,663,730 2,622,590 166,800 171,000 179,520 2,000 1,000 1,000 61,720 76,950 78,310 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 210 211 - PURCHASING Total Division: 211 212 - RISK MANAGEMENT Total Division: 212 213 - TREASURY MANAGEMENT Total Division: 213 302 - BUILDING AND SAFETY 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 700 700 780 100 100 0 3,000 2,800 1,300 450 490 460 300 300 590 26,700 27,300 30,500 29,500 29,700 84,340 291,270 310,340 376,800 202,860 210,650 189,700 39,210 41,170 42,410 78,590 98,500 100,170 0 0 100 300 300 50 1,050 1,100 1,900 520 520 520 7,200 7,200 5,200 11,160 11,160 28,960 340,890 370,600 369,010 76,690 76,090 79,880 28,380 34,240 34,840 0 0 200 800 800 800 100 200 300 5,250 4,500 4,500 56,000 54,000 39,200 167,220 169,830 159,720 610 610 620 230 270 270 550 600 600 200 200 180 200 200 200 550 500 520 1,300 1,300 1,300 3,640 3,680 3,690 1,531,510 1,498,400 1,540,000 566,660 674,280 686,190 1,750 1,750 1,200 500 300 2,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 10,000 13,000 13,000 1,220 1,220 2,500 1,580 1,480 1,480 16,500 15,000 14,900 1,992,770 1,651,760 1,756,760 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 302 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 303 304 - ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION MGT 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5150 - Office Supplies & Eqtf[pment 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5306 - Contract Serv/CFD Total Division: 304 305 - ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 5306 - Contract Serv/CFD Total Division: 305 306 - ENGINEERING - NPDES Total Division: 306 307 - ENGINEERING - PROJECT MGT 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5102 - Training 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5102 - Training 15,000 15,000 15,000 4,142,290 3,876,990 4,038,630 225,030 219,670 236,800 83,260 98,850 100,600 3,110 3,110 3,110 4,800 4,800 4,800 8,170 8,170 7,640 0 0 950 990 990 990 3,000 3,000 5,130 4,400 4,400 4,400 332,760 342,990 364,420 396,130 0 0 2,000 0 0 146,570 0 0 1,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 78,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 825,700 0 0 532,950 681,090 702,900 0 0 1,000 38,640 38,640 39,800 197,430 306,700 312,110 590 590 1,240 1,200 1,700 1,000 1,020 1,020 330 1,100 2,100 11,600 363,360 559,000 1,067,110 50,000 100,000 112,950 0 100,000 100,000 1,186,290 1,790,840 2,350,040 227,900 227,900 239,560 15,000 15,000 15,000 84,320 102,560 104,370 23,000 8,000 7,500 20,000 35,000 35,000 122,500 148,410 166,410 492,720 536,870 567,840 97,470 231,720 243,260 0 0 1,500 36,060 85,740 104,270 900 900 900 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BLTDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 307 308 - ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC MGT Total Division: 308 312 - FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Total Division: 312 313 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT. Total Division: 313 314 - PLANNING 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5306 - Contract Serv/CFD 5650 - Capital Project 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5160 - Membership Dues 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5501 - Adnfin./General Overhead 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 3,200 3,700 3,700 450 180 0 1,200 2,200 2,200 5,000 42,500 68,730 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 2,540,390 144,280 466,940 3,064,950 153,650 153,650 171,960 56,850 69,140 70,360 170 170 630 2,180 2,180 1,560 2,000 2,000 2,000 4,860 4,860 4,860 200 200 200 600 600 600 200 200 200 220,710 233,000 252,370 537,830 667,350 699,880 95,000 97,000 97,000 86,750 197,640 203,570 206,810 318,100 323,410 660 660 660 237,000 282,400 289,030 2,500 2,500 2,500 737,400 889,170 988,910 1,903,950 2,454,820 2,604,960 264,450 264,440 275,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 12,000 12,000 12,360 98,930 120,080 122,180 2,000 2,000 1,500 960 960 960 2,000 2,000 2,000 470 400 400 36,000 36,000 53,000 116,500 101,500 103,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 624,310 630,380 661,400 1,028,580 954,860 877,140 34,000 34,000 35,020 381,250 430,370 437,960 1,940 1,940 1,940 5,370 5,370 5,370 8,000 8,000 8,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 314 315 - PLANNING COMMISSION Total Division: 315 316 - STREET AND PARK MAINT. Total Division: 316 317 - VEHICLE AND EQUIP. MAINT. 5152 - Computer S of~ware 0 5160 - Membership Dues 1,410 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 810 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 21,300 5283 - Depreciation-Compnter Equip 1,640 5300 - Contract Services 215,400 5303 - Contract Serv/Reimbursable 50,000 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 5606 - Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixtures 0 5000 - Regular Salaries 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 0 380 1,410 1,410 810 890 25,900 26,450 1,640 990 224,400 300,660 300,000 336,660 0 7,040 0 3,250 1,749,700 1,988,700 2,043,160 6,040 6,040 6,120 3,230 2,500 2,500 300 300 300 9,570 8,840 8,920 5000 - Regular Salaries 1,094,880 5005 - Overtime Salaries 95,000 5010 - Part Time Salaries 97,780 5030 - Fringe Benefits 413,910 5100 - Travel and Meetings 800 5102 - Training 15,600 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 7,000 5152 - Computer Sot'tware 0 5160 - Membership Dues 8,350 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 330 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 509,600 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 16,500 5280 - Equip operations & Maint 18,000 5300 - Contract Services 1,225,010 5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal 23,480 5400 - Telephone Utilities 3,700 5402 - Water Utilities 104,400 5403 - Electric Utilities 13,790 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5102 - Training 5200 - operations & Maintenance 5250 - Vehicle operations & Maint. 5255 - Gasoline 5256 - Diesel Fuel 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 1,161,260 1,215,680 97,000 97,000 142,660 146,940 535,400 544,630 440 520 17,800 17,800 7,000 7,000 0 2,720 8,000 8,000 330 330 508,620 523,380 16,500 16,500 18,000 18,000 828,360 1,579,110 23,480 23,480 3,700 3,700 120,400 120,400 13,790 13,790 0 5,390 3,648,130 3,502,740 4,344,370 235,910 235,900 247,780 8,000 8,000 8,100 31,600 38,870 40,040 90,130 109,660 111,540 700 700 700 70,100 70,100 70,640 122,300 139,100 139,100 102,500 102,500 140,000 112,000 112,000 130,000 6,500 6,500 8,500 75,000 75,000 113,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment Total Division: 317 Total Division: 322 401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 401 420 - PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance Total Division: 420 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 701 5010 5030 5101 5102 5150 5152 5160 5161 5200 5201 5202 5250 5255 5282 5300 5301 5303 5606 - Part Time Salaries - Fringe Benefits - Travel, Meetings/D.A.R.E. - Training - Office Supplies & Equipment Computer Software Membership Dues Publications & Subscriptions Operations & Maintenance O & M/Reserve Program O & M/D.A.R.E. Program Vehicle Operations & Maint. Gasoline Veh & Equip MaintfD.A.R.E. Contract Services Conlxact Services/D.A.R.E. Contract Serv/Reimbursable Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixtures Total For Fund 001: 0 0 7,700 854,740 898,330 1,017,100 0 0 0 1,158,230 1,142,380 1,194,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 372,010 506,480 436,490 449,500 547,970 557,050 3,800 5,200 4,200 1,700 1,700 1,700 6,310 6,310 6,310 19,050 24,270 25,360 0 0 900 4,820 5,050 5,050 2,500 2,650 2,650 122,250 158,930 163,290 192,350 239,740 241,200 2,337,520 2,642,680 2,640,200 1,350 150 150 350 0 0 1,030 1,030 1,030 0 350 350 2,730 1,530 1,530 217,110 274,810 274,810 4,340 5,500 5,500 5,500 0 0 10,400 10,400 15,400 32,000 32,000 34,000 0 0 410 4,800 2,000 2,000 600 600 600 81,100 71,200 71,200 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 0 0 260,000 260,000 320,000 160,000 166,400 210,000 5,000 0 0 14,254,920 16,713,120 15,805,760 194,880 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 10,000 15,280,650 17,546,030 16,799,680 44,813,450 47,485,280 53,377,360 75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget REIMB ST/COUNTY PARKING CIT (003) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5200 - Operations & Maintenance Total Division: 701 Total For Fund 003: 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 CVWD REIMBURSEMENTS (006) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 006: 5000 - Regular Salaries ' 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services CAL TRANS REIMBURSEMENTS (007) Total Division: 316 CNTY OF S. B. REIMBURSEMENTS (008) 316 - STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 316 Total For Fund 008: COMM DEV TECHNICAL SRVCS FUND (016) 301 - COMMUNITY DEV-ADMINISTRATION 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5152 - Computer Software 5200 - operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip Total Division: 301 Total For Fund 016: CAPITAL RESERVE (025) 001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - 0 & M/Facilities 27,190 26,390 59,860 10,060 11,880 12,090 5,500 5,500 5,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 54,750 55,770 89,450 54,750 55,770 89,450 0 0 0 6,200 6,200 6,390 2,290 2,790 2,840 70,350 73,870 74,990 78,840 82,860 84,220 78,840 82,860 84,220 0 0 9,800 0 0 200 0 0 61,500 0 0 2,250 398,400 334,600 708,810 0 0 49,000 398,400 334,600 831,560 398,400 334,600 831,560 0 0 29,660 0 0 3,150 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 001 Total For Fund 025: 5300 - Contract Services 174,000 135,000 5304 - Contxact Serv/Facilities 46,000 36,000 5401 - Gas Utilities 3,600 0 5402 - Water Utilities 2,500 0 5403 - Electric Utilities 25,000 25,000 5416 - General Liability Insurance 210,990 228,390 5417 - General Liability Claims 381,000 381,000 5602 - Capital Outlay-Bldg & Imprvmnt 105,500 77,000 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 235,000 5606 - Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixtures 15,000 0 5650 - Capital Project 0 104,350 9290 - Transfer Out-Libra~ Fund 50,000 0 9705 - Transfer Out-Municipal Utility 0 1,148,840 841,980 24,000 0 0 29,900 161,490 361,000 29,740 218,400 45,370 143,690 0 1,148,840 1,013,590 2,370,580 3,037,220 1,013,590 2,370,580 3,037,220 200,000 200,000 330,000 200,000 200,000 330,000 200,000 200,000 330,000 BENEFITS CONTINGENCY (073) 002 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL Total Division: 002 Total For Fund 073: 5000 - Regular Salaries ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ADMIN (100) 202 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN Total Division: 202 Total For Fund 100: AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (101) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS Total Division: 203 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5102 - Training 5105 - Mileage 5152 - Computer Software 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 9841 - Transfer Om-AD 93-1 348,730 344,640 354,980 129,030 155,090 157,830 7,000 7,000 7,000 400 400 430 0 0 10,670 103,150 62,700 77,320 3,670 950 4,390 39,770 38,520 42,540 0 0 20,360 631,750 609,300 675,520 631,750 609,300 675,520 1,500 0 0 240,490 0 0 3,430 0 0 1,760 0 0 0 0 250,560 247,180 0 250,560 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 101: AB2766 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (105) 208 - GRANT MANAGEMENT (AQMD) 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 208 Total For Fund 105: BEAUTIFICATION (110) 316 - STREET AND PARK MA1NT. Total Division: 316 Total For Fund 110: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5300 - Contract Services 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project 9612 - Transfer Out-CFD 2001-01 DRAINAGE FAC/GENERAL (112) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 112: 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project DRAINAGE-ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE (114) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 114: ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (116) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project 247,180 0 250,560 16,260 17,090 17,600 6,020 7,690 7,830 95,760 131,260 60,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 70,000 0 70,000 189,240 157,240 156,630 189,240 157,240 156,630 5,880 4,180 4,310 2,180 1,880 1,910 492,640 117,240 752,480 56,550 42,580 42,580 5,043,700 4,681,000 1,760,320 0 0 42,000 5,600,950 4,846,880 2,603,600 5,600,950 4,846,880 2,603,600 98,160 133,280 133,280 3,869,620 2,318,420 4,165,240 3,967,780 2,451,700 4,298,520 3,967,780 2,451,700 4,298,520 11,170 7,480 7,480 0 600,000 4,300,000 11,170 607,480 4,307,480 11,170 607,480 4,307,480 6,000 3,370 3,370 20,000 20,000 265,890 26,000 23,370 269,260 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 116: 26,000 23,370 269,260 PARK DEVELOPMENT (120) 305 - ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT MGT 5000 - Regular Salaries 67,150 5030 - Fringe Benefits 24,850 5100 - Travel and Meetings 1,000 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 0 5152 - Computer Software 0 5160 - Membership Dues 210 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 3,500 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 0 5300 - Contract Services 137,000 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 0 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 0 5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 0 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 0 5606 - Capital Ouflay-FurrffFixmres 0 5650 - Capital Project 6,605,800 Total Division: 305 Total For Fund 120: TRANSPORTATION (124) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 124: 5000 5005 5010 5030 5152 5200 5283 5300 5501 5650 9230 9612 67,150 69,160 30,220 30,750 1,000 1,000 0 35,000 0 52,520 510 540 3,500 120,000 0 3,040 111,000 471,550 65,800 65,800 0 600,000 0 94,090 0 180,000 0 550,000 3,735,420 3,442,330 LOWER ETIWANDA DRAINAGE (126) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 6,839,510 4,014,600 5,715,780 6,839,510 4,014,600 5,715,780 - Regular Salaries 770,460 727,720 749,550 Overtime Salaries 0 0 560 Par~ Time Salaries 7,410 7,410 7,630 Fringe Benefits 285,220 327,620 333,400 Computer Sol3ware 3,180 9,000 9,000 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 200 Depreciation-Computer Equip 1,900 0 0 Contract Services 15,000 95,000 75,000 Admin./Geneml Overhead 309,040 318,530 318,530 Capital Project 11,088,250 11,982,900 11,918,380 Transfer Out-Regional Transit 0 0 313,720 Transfer Out-CFD 2001-01 0 0 41,650 5650 - Capital Project 12,480,460 13,468,180 13,767,620 12,480,460 13,468,180 13,767,620 84,420 124,420 0 84,420 124,420 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 126: 84,420 124,420 0 LMD #1 GENERAL CITY (130) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 130: LMD #2 VICTORIA (131) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Vet Rent 5280 - Equip Operatiom & Maint 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contxact Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project 5000 - P-~egular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contract Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 53,720 61,710 63,560 16,400 35,030 36,080 21,360 30,920 31,410 0 260 260 64,520 64,720 64,970 16,000 16,000 16,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,800 4,800 4,800 640 640 640 647,790 831,660 871,660 19,000 19,000 19,000 49,000 51,300 51,300 3,500 4,000 4,000 154,000 154,000 154,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 53,800 80,040 80,040 79,230 80,040 80,040 0 40,000 0 1,232,760 1,523,120 1,526,760 1,232,760 1,523,120 1,526,760 544,140 546,810 563,210 1,000 1,000 1,050 84,600 110,240 113,550 208,940 255,980 260,330 0 850 850 64,400 67,150 67,150 8,000 18,000 18,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 750 750 1,010 1,010 1,010 1,020,690 1,176,120 1,203,230 11,000 22,000 22,000 46,000 62,500 62,500 1,790 1,790 1,790 323,000 323,000 323,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 28,480 29,300 29,300 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004~05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 131: 5501 - Admin./Geneml Overhead 167,920 173,700 173,700 2,573,470 2,851,200 2,902,420 2,573,470 2,851,200 2,902,420 LMD #3A HYSSOP (132) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 132: 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 440 440 440 2,130 2,230 2,230 630 630 630 210 210 210 40 50 50 420 250 250 3,870 3,810 3,810 3,870 3,810 3,810 LMD #3B MEDIANS (133) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 133: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5203 - O & M/Complex Maintenance 5204 - O & MfFacilities 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5280 - Equip operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Adrahaistrafion 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5603 - Capital Outlay-Eqinpment 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 144,240 147,160 151,570 2,500 2,500 2,500 20,000 24,250 24,980 55,170 68,400 69,570 0 90 90 52,550 52,550 52,550 0 12,650 12,650 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 324,480 346,820 346,820 124,800 127,000 196,400 35,300 37,000 37,000 3,360 3,360 3,360 70,000 70,000 70,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 3,250 3,660 3,660 60,560 59,390 59,390 0 3,100 1,400 1,140 0 0 948,850 1,009,430 1,083,440 948,850 1,009,430 1,083,440 LMD #4 TERRA VISTA (134) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 593,490 598,710 616,670 1,000 1,000 1,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 134: 5010 - Part Time Salaries 14,450 5030 - Fringe Benefits 220,890 5100 - Travel and Meetings 0 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 59,270 5204 - O & M/Facilities 14,000 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 6,000 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 3,750 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 150 5300 - Contract Services 363,790 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilifies 16,000 5310 - Tree Maintenance 13,200 5400 - Telephone Utilities 2,940 5402 - Water Utilities 131,000 5403 - Electric Utilities 25,410 5500 - Assessment Administration 17,930 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 111,230 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 7,450 29,540 30,430 272,080 276,840 170 170 59,270 60,370 14,000 14,000 6,000 6,000 1,000 1,000 3,750 3,750 150 150 448,100 446,600 16,000 16,000 13,900 13,900 2,940 2,940 160,000 160,000 25,410 25,410 19,270 19,270 112,500 112,500 0 0 1,602,950 1,783,790 1,807,000 1,602,950 1,783,790 1,807,000 LMD tt5 TOT LOT (135) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 135: LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY (136) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maiut. 5300 - Contract Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities '5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maiut. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5300 - Contract Services 300 300 300 500 500 500 70 70 70 1,800 1,890 1,890 1,000 1,000 1,000 540 540 540 260 260 260 240 240 240 650 360 360 0 16,500 15,950 5,360 21,660 21,110 5,360 21,660 21,110 13,630 13,790 14,200 0 6,140 6,320 5,040 6,760 6,870 0 170 170 13,030 13,030 13,030 1,000 1,000 1,000 100 100 100 257,770 273,230 273,230 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 136: LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (137) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 137: LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (138) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 138: LMD #9 LOWER ETIWANDA (139) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5250 ~ Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5200 - operations & Maintenance 5250 - Vehicle operations & Maint. 5300 - Contract Services 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 25,200 26,450 26,450 81,800 81,800 81,800 5,200 5,200 5,200 6,940 6,900 6,900 24,140 26,650 26,650 433,850 461,220 461,920 433,850 461,220 461,920 108,470 111,000 114,330 15,900 24,740 25,480 41,560 52,180 53,060 39,370 39,370 39,370 6,000 6,000 6,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 500 500 50O 500 500 500 270,170 284,630 293,130 9,000 9,000 9,000 13,100 13,650 13,650 3,150 3,150 3,150 65,000 75,000 75,000 17,100 17,100 17,100 8,570 8,780 8,780 37,040 36,820 36,820 637,930 684,920 698,370 637,930 684,920 698,370 2,080 2,080 2,080 800 800 800 21,560 26,560 26,560 0 20,000 20,000 530 530 530 3,230 3,230 3,230 420 700 700 830 960 960 1,890 1,920 1,920 31,340 56,780 56,780 31,340 56,780 56,780 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 139: 5010 - Part Time Salaries 9,050 7,190 5030 - Fringe Benefits 810 650 5100 - Travel and Meetings 0 170 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 7,150 2,150 5204 - O & M/Facilities 2,000 2,000 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 200 200 5300 - Contract Services 32,140 21,000 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 4,000 4,000 5310 - Tree Maintenance 2,050 2,100 5402 - Water Utilities 5,440 5,440 5403 - Electric Utilities 780 780 5500 - Assessment Administration 3,250 3,270 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 34,780 38,220 7,410 650 170 2,150 2,000 200 21,000 4,000 2,100 5,440 1,400 3,270 38,220 101,650 87,170 88,010 101,650 87,170 88,010 LMD#10RANCHOETIWANDA(140) 303- ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 140: 5005 - Overtime Salaries 1,000 1,000 5010 - Part Time Salaries 14,000 25,250 5030 - Fringe Benefits 1,260 2,270 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 11,650 12,150 5204 - O & M/Facilities 4,000 4,000 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 1,000 1,000 5280 - Equip Operatiom & Maint 1,000 1,000 5300 - Contract Services 103,080 105,140 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 9,000 9,000 5310 - Tree Maintenance 2,250 2,350 5402 - Water Utilities 37,000 37,000 5403 - Electric Utilities 11,000 21,000 5500 - Assessment Administration 3,280 3,400 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 27,150 28,120 1,000 26,010 2,270 12,150 4,000 1,000 1,000 105,140 9,000 2,350 37,000 28,000 3,400 28,120 226,670 252,680 260,440 226,670 252,680 260,440 SLD #1 ARTERIAL (151) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 151: SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL (152) 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 500 500 500 428,500 428,500 428,500 119,660 122,560 122,560 45,380 46,630 46,630 594,040 598,190 598,190 594,040 598,190 598,190 qq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 152: SLD #3 VICTORIA (153) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 153: SLD #4 TERRA VISTA (154) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 154: SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY (155) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTIL4.TION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 155: SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA (156) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5403 - ElechSc Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./Geneml Overhead 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5280 - Equip Operations & Maim 5300 - Contract Services 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 238,300 280,000 280,000 33,120 33,230 33,230 20,810 20,870 20,870 292,230 334,100 334,100 292,230 334,100 334,100 5,000 5,000 5,000 207,370 207,370 207,370 28,250 29,100 29,100 19,440 19,370 19,370 260,060 260,840 260,840 260,060 260,840 260,840 880 500 500 38,640 38,640 38,640 77,920 77,920 77,920 17,930 19,270 19,270 13,660 10,350 10,350 149,030 146,680 146,680 149,030 146,680 146,680 5,000 5,000 5,000 50,270 50,270 50,270 6,940 6,900 6,900 3,590 3,240 3,240 65,800 65,410 65,410 65,800 65,410 65,410 800 800 800 400 400 400 36,300 36,300 36,300 57,810 57,810 57,810 3,010 3,280 3,280 8,760 8,340 8,340 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 156: 107,080 106,930 106,930 107,080 106,930 106,930 SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA (157) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 157: 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 15,080 15,080 15,080 9,840 10,180 10,180 5,150 4,590 4,590 30,070 29,850 29,850 30,070 29,850 29,850 3,770 3,770 3,770 3,690 3,830 3,830 19,150 21,520 21,520 26,610 29,120 29,120 26,610 29,120 29,120 SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA (158) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 158: 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administxation 5501 - Admin./General Overhead GAS TAX 2105/PROPlll (170) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 170: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5300 - Contract Services 5650 - Capital Project 232,740 227,550 234,380 86,110 102,400 104,210 610 610 610 478,650 613,500 620,230 7,000 405,000 405,000 805,110 1,349,060 1,364,430 805,110 1,349,060 1,364,430 GAS TAX 2106-2107 (172) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5251 - Depreciation - Vehicles 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5281 - Depreciation - Equipment 5403 - Electric Utilities 767,980 755,880 778,560 10,000 10,000 18,500 61,700 80,850 83,280 289,700 347,430 353,440 17,540 17,540 17,540 7,500 7,500 7,500 111,410 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 17,010 0 0 990,190 690,190 690,190 2,275,030 1,911,390 1,951,010 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Obi ect Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 172: 2,275,030 1,911,390 1,951,010 MEASURE "I" (176) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 176: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5300 - Contract Services 5650 - Capital Project 109,320 104,100 107,220 40,450 46,850 47,680 105,640 350,000 0 2,963,000 2,243,000 2,567,470 3,218,410 2,743,950 2,722,370 3,218,410 2,743,950 2,722,370 0 107,000 107,000 0 107,000 107,000 0 107,000 107,000 211,290 0 0 211,290 0 0 211,290 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 SB 325 (180) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 180: 5650 - Capital Project AB 2928 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF (182) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 182: CMAQ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (184) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 184: FOOTHILL BLVD MAINT-CALTRANS (186) 316 - STREET AND PARK MAINT. 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rem 5255 - Gasoline 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 5320 - Hazardous Waste Removal Total Division: 316 Total For Fund 186: 17,250 17,250 17,770 6,380 7,760 7,900 5,000 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,750 12,750 15,550 3,000 3,000 3,000 51,880 53,260 56,720 51,880 53,260 56,720 "/7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRNT (204) 314 - PLANNING 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 314 Total For Fund 204: CDBG - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (205) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 205: TRANSP ENHANCEMENT ACT (TEA)21 (208) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 208: PEDESTRIAN GRANT/ART 3 (214) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 214: 5650 - Capital Project CA RECYC/LITTER REDUCTION GRNT (225) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 225: USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT (226) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 276,060 238,520 241,830 102,140 107,340 108,820 0 0 5,160 1,639,570 852,090 1,074,950 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,430,760 2,017,770 1,197,950 1,430,760 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 2,650 0 0 0 314,000 314,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 2,650 314,000 314,000 16,000 4,000 7,920 16,000 4,000 7,920 16,000 4,000 7,920 21,060 21,060 15,000 17,600 17,600 33,660 0 0 12,930 38,660 38,660 61,590 38,660 38,660 61,590 10,000 10,000 11,180 2,000 700 700 30,270 31,570 44,070 42,270 42,270 55,950 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 226: REGIONAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV (230) Total Division: 303 SIGNAL COORDINATION GRANT (232) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 5650 - Capital Project Total For Fund 232: SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM (234) 303 - ENGINEER_lNG - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 234: PROP 12 PARK BOND ACT (236) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 236: 5650 - Capital Project PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-SPECIAL (237) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 237: PROP 40 PARK BOND ACT-PER CAP (238) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 238: FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS-DREIER (239) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 239: 5650 - Capital Project 42,270 42,270 55,950 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 18,700 19,000 0 18,700 19,000 0 18,700 19,000 1,500,000 0 341,590 1,500,000 0 341,590 1,500,000 0 341,590 10,000,000 0 5,328,430 10,000,000 0 5,328,430 10,000,000 0 5,328,430 1,000,000 0 839,440 1,000,000 0 839,440 1,000,000 0 839,440 50,000 0 854,740 50,000 0 854,740 50,000 0 854,740 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget MILLIKEN LAND TRANSACTION (240) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 240: 5650 - Capital Project 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (244) 302 - BUILDING AND SAFETY 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5285 - Safety Gear & Equipment 5300 - Contract Services 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip Total Division: 302 Total For Fund 244: 0 0 1,200 0 0 1,220 0 2,930 8,790 0 10,000 14,000 0 89,920 87,110 0 0 17,950 0 102,850 130,270 0 102,850 130,270 RECREATION SERVICES (250) 401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contract Services 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip Total Division: 401 Total For Fund 250: 242,290 316,880 326,390 773,610 1,004,540 954,580 127,500 190,950 193,470 650 650 0 0 2,000 3,180 272,920 265,520 248,720 770 770 3,400 616,120 707,670 727,600 0 0 26,680 0 0 2,080 2,033,860 2,488,980 2,486,100 2,033,860 2,488,980 2,486,100 YOUTH ENRICHMENT GRANT (252) 401- COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000 5010 5030 5100 5200 5300 Total Division: 401 Total For Fund 252: Regular Salaries 53,120 0 2,620 Part Time Salaries 171,906 0 330 Fringe Benefits 29,570 0 20 Travel and Meetings 3,300 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 32,600 0 4,070 Contract Services 19,470 0 0 309,960 0 7,040 309,960 0 7,040 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget SENIOR OUTREACH GRANT (258) 401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 401 Total For Fund 258: TEEN AFTER SCHOOL PROG GRANT (260) Total Division: 401 TEEN CONNECTION GRANT-STATE (266) Total Division: 401 TARGET LITERACY GRANT (268) Total Division: 401 LIBRARY FUND (290) 601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 93O8 TotaI Division: 601 603 -AFTERSCHOOL LEARN1NGPROGRAM 5000 5030 5100 5150 Total Division: 603 604 - BOOKMOBILE SERVICES 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Software 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5283 - Depreciation-Computer Equip 5300 - Contract Services 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5599 - ERAF Payment to State of CA 5650 - Capital Project 9298 - Transfer Out-CA Literacy Cmpgn - Transfer Out-Families for Lit. 5200 - Regular Salaries - Fringe Benefits - Travel and Meetings - Office Supplies & Equipment - Operations & Maintenance 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 990 990 0 990 990 0 990 990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 627,490 627,490 646,320 298,780 273,260 275,210 242,740 295,240 300,230 2,000 2,000 2,000 5,800 5,800 5,800 0 15,000 6,000 0 0 500 2,350 2,150 2,210 190,000 146,690 183,430 20,270 0 800 162,000 99,000 103,950 18,000 15,000 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 72,000 69,000 69,000 0 189,000 189,000 0 0 399,820 0 0 463,640 35,020 1,400 1,400 13,870 12,470 12,470 1,693,320 1,756,500 2,679,780 17,820 17,820 18,350 6,590 8,020 8,160 250 250 0 0 200 200 200 0 250 24,860 26,290 26,960 45,930 48,270 49,720 23,000 10,250 16,000 17,450 21,930 22,310 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004105 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 604 605 - LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Total Division: 605 Total Division: 607 Total For Fund 290: 5105 - Mileage 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5283 - Depreciation-Con'~uter Equip 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5160 - Membership Dues 100 100 100 0 500 500 2,250 2,000 2,000 2,420 2,420 2,420 5,000 3,750 1,000 96,150 89,220 94,050 1,500 1,630 1,630 350 350 350 1,850 1,980 1,980 0 0 0 1,816,180 1,873,990 2,802,770 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN (298) 601 - LIBRARY-ADMINISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5105 - Mileage 5160 - Membership Dues 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 601 Total For Fund 298: 26,730 26,730 27,530 5,000 5,000 5,000 9,990 12,130 12,340 500 500 400 150 200 210 180 220 220 500 500 800 1,930 1,930 1,930 44,980 47,210 48,430 44,980 47,210 48,430 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT (308) 602 - GRANT MANAGEMENT 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance Total Division: 602 Total For Fund 308: PUBLIC LIBRARY BOND ACT-2000 (310) 602 - GRANT MANAGEMENT 5650 - Capital Project Total Division: 602 Total For Fund 310: 8,910 8,910 9,180 13,000 13,000 13,000 3,560 4,270 4,340 250 0 0 25,720 26,180 26,520 25,720 26,180 26,520 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 0 5,000,000 7,270,020 0 0 0 COP'S GRANT - UNIVERSAL (352) Total Division: 701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget COP'S PROGRAM GRANT-STATE (354) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 701 Total For Fund 354: 5300 - Contract Services 0 220,870 291,380 0 220,870 291,380 0 220,870 291,380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,770 94,210 0 0 15,330 0 50,770 109,540 0 50,770 109,540 160,000 120,000 203,830 160,000 120,000 203,830 160,000 120,000 203,830 0 8,580 8,580 0 8,580 8,580 0 8,580 8,580 0 0 70,280 0 0 13,980 0 0 41,000 0 0 125,260 0 0 125,260 0 0 30,150 0 0 30,150 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLK 2000 (365) Total Division: 701 CA LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (366) Total Division: 702 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2002 (368) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5604 - Capital Outlay~Vehicles Total Division: 701 Total For Fund 368: COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT (369) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 701 5300 - Contract Services Total For Fund 369: OTS-"DRINK,DRIVE,LOSE" GRANT (370) 702 - GRANT MANAGEMENT 5300 - Contxact Services Total Division: 702 Total For Fund 370: OTS TRAFFIC SAFETY PRGM GRANT (371) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles Total Division: 701 Total For Fund 371: OTS 2005 STATE SEAT BELT GRANT (372) 701 - POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total For Fund 372: 0 0 30,150 DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRNT (380) 501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5290 - Specialized Tools & Equipment 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles Total Division: 501 Total For Fund 380: 0 0 4,270 0 0 22,170 0 114,990 114,990 0 114,990 141,430 0 114,990 141,430 COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT (382) 105 - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Total Division: 105 Total For Fund 382: 5152 - Computer Software 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5290 - Specialized Tools & Equipment 5300 - Contract Services 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5605 - Capital Outlay-Compnter Equip 0 12,780 12,780 0 0 2,910 0 1,420 390 0 30,090 30,090 0 30,400 52,380 0 65,820 57,430 0 140,510 155,980 0 140,510 155,980 0 0 23,960 0 0 23,960 0 0 23,960 0 0 21,750 0 0 21,750 0 0 21,750 166,440 166,000 0 166,440 166,000 0 166,440 166,000 0 OTS FIRE EQUIPMENT GRANT (384) 501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 501 Total For Fund 384: 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION GRANT (388) 501 - FIRE ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 501 Total For Fund 388: AD 82-1 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL (600) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 600: 5650 - Capital Project AD 84-1 DAY CREEK/MELLO (602) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 602: 5650 - Capital Project 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 21,440 0 0 80 3,510 3,510 21,520 3,510 3,510 21,520 3,510 3,510 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL (604) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 604: 5300 - Contract Services 5501 - Admin./General Overhead AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DISTRICT (606) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 606: 5300 - Contract Services 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5650 - Capital Project CFD 2000-02 RC CORPORATE PARK (608) Total Division: 203 CFD 2001-01 (612) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 5152 - Computer Software 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5650 - Capital Project Total For Fund 612: 53,240 0 0 150 100 100 0 53,240 53,240 53,390 53,340 53,340 53,390 53,340 53,340 0 0 0 0 300 300 7,000 5,000 6,690 250,000 40,000 630,010 0 400,000 5,001,000 257,000 445,300 5,638,000 257,000 445,300 5,638,000 CFD 2003-01 PROJECT FUND (614) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 614: 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5650 - Capital Project 5710 - Bond Issuance Costs 2,000 6,000 5,000 3,321,000 24,000 1,047,000 7,430,000 200,000 5,415,000 580,850 0 0 11,333,850 230,000 6,467,000 11,333,850 230,000 6,467,000 CFD2003-01CULTURALCENTER(615) 303- ENGINEERING -ADMINISTRATION 5650 - Capital Project 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 615: CFD 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ES (617) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 617: CFD 2004-02 RANCHO SUMMIT (618) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 618: 5300 - Contract Services SPORTS COMPLEX (700) 201 - ADMIN SRVCS-ADM1NISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5203 - O & M/Complex Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5252 - Emergency & Routine Vet Rent 5300 - Contract Services 5302 - Contract Serv/Complex Maint. 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5401 - Gas Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities Total Division: 201 401 - COMMUNITY SRVCS-ADMINISTRATION 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5206 - O & M/Recreation Programs 5305 - Contract Serv/Recreation Prgs Total Division: 401 Total For Fund 700: MUNICIPAL UTILITY(705) 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 0 0 105,160 0 0 105,160 0 0 105,160 0 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 187,440 189,180 194,860 33,000 33,000 30,270 139,290 139,290 146,200 81,890 97,670 99,170 38,500 34,000 34,000 50,600 50,600 58,850 3,000 2,500 2,500 45,000 45,000 45,000 6,800 5,000 5,800 119,300 121,080 156,180 3,000 2,800 2,800 9,600 9,600 14,400 66,730 66,730 66,730 268,250 268,250 263,450 1,052,400 1,064,700 1,120,210 83,520 83,520 86,030 100,740 95,280 64,910 35,950 41,980 42,640 200 200 200 55,460 54,320 42,560 115,070 115,080 93,400 390,940 390,380 329,740 1,443,340 1,455,080 1,449,950 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 705: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5100 - Travel and Meetings 5102 - Training 5150 - Office Supplies & Equipment 5152 - Computer Sofavare 5160 - Membership Dues 5161 - Publications & Subscriptions 5209 - O & M/Electric Utility 5309 - Cuntxact Srvc/Electric Utility 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5603 - Capital Outlay-Eqtfipment 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Eqinp 5650 - Capital Project 9001 - Transfer Out-General Fund 0 116,200 119,690 0 52,290 53,210 0 3,200 3,200 0 1,000 500 0 1,000 1,000 0 75,650 143,650 0 2,600 28,180 0 300 300 0 3,090,300 2,991,330 0 1,156,000 1,329,000 0 1,300 1,600 0 95,000 154,770 0 11,000 31,000 0 1,275,000 3,862,230 0 75,000 75,000 0 5,955,840 8,794,660 0 5,955,840 8,794,660 118,900 255,500 365,410 196,000 0 28,470 314,900 255,500 393,880 314,900 255,500 393,880 EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT (712) 001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL Total Division: 001 Total For Fund 712: 5603 - Capital Outlay-Eqfftpment 5604 - Capital Outlay-Vehicles COMP EQUIP/TECH REPLCMENT FUND (714) 001 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL 5152 - Computer Sol%vare 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5300 - Contract Services 5605 - Capital Outlay-Computer Equip Total Division: 001 Total For Fund 714: 35,000 35,760 45,560 1,200 330 1,440 148,520 126,270 140,150 27,050 14,190 175,850 211,770 176,550 363,000 211,770 176,550 363,000 0 0 0 AD 82-1R REDEMPTION FUND (800) Total Division: 203 CFD 84-1 REDEMPTION FUND (805) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,680,000 830 830 36,390 36,390 36,390 109,170 109,170 109,170 0 117,560 88,050 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget ' Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 805: 5701 - Principal Repayments AD 84-2 REDEMPTION FUND (807) Total Division: 203 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLND DEBT (812) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admm./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments 9815 - Transfer Out-AD 88-2 Police Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 812: AD 91-2 REDEMPTION-DAY CANYON (838) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5000 - Regular Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 838: AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER (841) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 841: CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE (842) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTR/CTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 0 1,560,000 1,560,000 1,827,060 1,825,450 1,795,940 1,827,060 1,825,450 1,795,940 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 1,500 238,480 830 830 15,630 15,630 15,630 34,010 34,010 34,010 0 148,800 126,590 0 85,000 85,000 700 700 700 290,320 286,470 264,260 290,320 286,470 264,260 21,450 21,450 22,090 0 22,940 23,630 7,940 11,710 11,880 2,060 2,060 2,060 4,120 4,120 4,120 35,570 62,280 63,780 35,570 62,280 63,780 0 1,500 1,500 0 3,350 3,300 0 3,390 3,390 0 1,760 1,760 0 161,520 158,530 0 80,000 80,000 0 251,520 248,480 0 251,520 248,480 1,500 1,500 1,500 384,000 1,250 830 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 842: 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments 13,340 13,340 · 13,340 22,230 22,230 22,230 0 257,040 219,280 0 150,000 150,000 421,070 445,360 407,180 421,070 445,360 407,180 PD 85 REDEMPTION FUND (848) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 848: 5000 - Regular Salaries 5005 - Overtime Salaries 5010 - Part Time Salaries 5030 - Fringe Benefits 5200 - Operations & Maintenance 5204 - O & M/Facilities 5250 - Vehicle Operations & Maint. 5252 - Emergency & Routine Veh Rent 5280 - Equip Operations & Maint 5300 - Contract Services 5304 - Contract Serv/Facilities 5310 - Tree Maintenance 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5400 - Telephone Utilities 5402 - Water Utilities 5403 - Electric Utilities 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5603 - Capital Outlay-Equipment 5650 - Capital Project 334,330 334,330 344,360 2,500 2,500 2,500 11,400 23,940 24,660 124,730 152,600 155,260 108,450 92,450 92,450 15,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 23,940 17,800 23,150 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,600 12,600 670,000 670,000 670,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 108,150 108,150 108,150 128,810 128,810 128,810 139,720 139,240 139,240 133,710 133,710 133,710 0 11,600 9,900 150,000 133,660 133,660 2,000,240 2,013,890 2,030,950 2,000,240 2,013,890 2,030,950 0 0 901,850 0 0 901,850 0 0 901,850 PD 85 RESERVE FUND (850) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 850: 9848 - Transfer Out-Fund 848 CFD 2000-01 SO ETIWANDA RDMPTN (852) 303 - ENGINEERING - ADMINISTRATION 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 69,000 1,500 1,500 108,990 2,300 2,300 8,290 8,290 8,290 5,530 5,530 5,530 0 76,580 75,980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Obi ect Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 303 Total For Fund 852: 5701 - Principal Repayments 0 30,000 30,000 191,810 124,200 123,600 191,810 124,200 123,600 AD 1999-1 REFUNDING REDEMPTION (854) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 854: 524,000 1,000 830 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,170 5,170 5,170 0 186,380 155,940 0 320,000 350,000 539,170 522,550 521,940 539,170 522,550 521,940 CFD 2000-02 RC CORP PARK RDMP (856) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 856: 1,500 1,500 1,500 484,540 2,300 2,300 17,720 19,630 19,630 26,570 26,570 26,570 0 400,630 400,890 0 90,000 90,000 530,330 540,630 540,890 530,330 540,630 540,890 CFD 2001-01 SERIES A REDMPTION (860) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 5701 - Principal Repayments Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 860: 0 1,500 1,500 0 1,750 1,750 30,000 27,000 27,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 866,900 862,230 866,860 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,136,900 1,132,480 1,137,110 1,136,900 1,132,480 1,137,110 CFD 2001-01 SERIES B REDMPTION (862) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense 0 1,500 0 0 1,750 1,750 7,000 2,720 2,720 3,000 3,000 3,000 65,450 65,450 74,220 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 AMENDED BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2003/04 Fiscal Year 2004/05 Adopted Adopted Amended Object Budget Budget Budget Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 862: 5701 - Principal Repayments 10,000 10,000 10,000 85,450 84,420 91,690 85,450 84,420 91,690 CFD 2003-01 SERIES A REDEMPTN (864) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTKICTS/CFDS 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Interest Expense Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 864: 0 1,500 1,500 0 2,000 2,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 1,339,220 959,340 445,920 1,379,220 1,002,840 489,420 1,379,220 1,002,840 489,420 CFD 2003-01 SERIES B REDEMPTN (866) 203 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/CFDS Total Division: 203 Total For Fund 866: 5300 - Contract Services 5330 - Payment to Trustee 5500 - Assessment Administration 5501 - Admin./General Overhead 5700 - Imerest Expense 0 1,500 1,500 0 2,000 2,000 7,000 3,700 3,700 3,000 3,000 3,000 261,000 178,080 58,330 271,000 188,280 68,530 271,000 188,280 68,530 142,009,220 128,051,810 167,905,290 Total for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: III R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E ×Gl N E E R I N G D E PA RTt'IE N T Staff Report DATE: May 18,2005 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Enginee APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11763035650/1022176 (MEASURE T), 11703035650/1022170 (GAS TAX) AN D 12043145650/1527204 (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of VariOus Streets to be funded from account no. 11763035650/1022176 (M easu re '1'), 11703035650/1022170 and 12043145650/1527204 (Community Development Block Grant) and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The scope of work for FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay for various local streets consists of, but not limited to clearing and grubbing, cold planing, crack sealing, A.C. overlay, re-striping and pavement markings. The project will be funded from Measure "1" funds, Account No. 11763035650/1022176, Gas Tax funds 11703035650/1022170 and Community Development Block Grant funds, Account No. 12043145650/1527204. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article, Section 15301© of the CEQA guidelines. I12,. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay - Advertising May 18, 2005 Page 2 The Engineer's estimate for FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Oveday is $1,091,200 and legal advertising is scheduled for May 24 and June 7, 2005, with bid opening scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday June 14, 2005. Respectfully submitted, Willig~'J. O Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachments 113 VICINITY MAP UPIJ~D LEGEND: STREET FOR REHAB. (~.c. OV~Ri~Y)  CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA O FYg005/06 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION A.C. OV~RILAY N.T.S. I/~, RESO,UT ON NO. $° ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on June 14, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a 115 RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 2 similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 ~ercent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 4 thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City' Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "2005~2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4066 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 18th day of May, 2005. Publish Dates: May 24, 2005 and June 7, 2005 RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" This project is partially federally financed by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (24 CRF, Part 57) for the purpose of providing improvements pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and is subject to certain requirements including the payment of Federal prevailing wages, compliance with "Section 3 - Affirmative Action Requirements", Executive Order #11246 and others. The aforementioned are described in the "Special Federal Provisions" section of the bid documents. Additional information pertaining to the Federal requirement is on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community Development Department. Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on June 28, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 May 18, 2005 Page 2 Bids will be publicly opened and road in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS." A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING is scheduled for Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. All Prime Contractors aro required to have a representative attend and sign in at the pro-bid meeting. Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder's proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the pre-bid meeting, Section 3 requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the required Section 3 documents in the bid proposal. Award of the project will be contingent on the content of these Section 3 documents. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, in consideration of the award. MINIMUM WAGE RATE: Notice is hereby given that this project is partially funded with U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and that the rate of wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic employed under this contract shall be not less that as specified under the U. S. Department of Labor General Wage Decision in the locality in which the work is to be performed as modified within ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date as required under the Davis-Bacon Act. Notwithstanding the conditions hereinabove, the California Labor Code Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 & 2, stipulates that not less that the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in the locality in which the work is to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California shall be paid to all workmen employed. Where a discrepancy exists between the federal and state prevailing wage rages, the policy of the California Department of Labor is to require that the higher of the two prevailing wage rates shall apply. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and aro available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not moro than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 May 18, 2005 Page 3 such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the previsions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractdrs on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 May 18, 2005 Page 4 comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 May 18, 2005 Page 5 Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4066 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 18th day of May, 2005. Publish Dates: May 24, 2005 and June 7, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: May 18, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engine~ APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE~A-ECCERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE 'T', ACCOUNT NUMBER 11763035650/1022176 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Measure "1", Account No. 11763035650/1022176. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The scope of work for FY 2005~06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal for various local streets consists of, but not limited to weed killing and removal, crack sealing, slurry sealing and striping. The project will be funded from Measure "1", Account No. 11763035650/1022176. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal - Advertising May 18, 2005 Page 2 The Engineer's estimate is $314,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 24 and June 7, 2005, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday June 14, 2005. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachments VICINITY MAP (.4L~".) LEOEND:  STREET FOR REHAB. (SLURRY SEAL TYPE II)  CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~.~,.~.~ FY2005/06 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM ... RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY OF VARIOUS STREETS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on June 14, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY OF VARIOUS STREETS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY OF VARIOUS STREETS." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 2 similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to 'any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on.an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 3 journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply.with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed t6 execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done /2.5 RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 4 thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY- FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General ProvisionS, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 5 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "2005/2006 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to: Cindy HackeR, Associate Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4066 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 18th day of May, 2005. Publish Dates: May 24, 2005 and June 7, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A POLICE D E PAR T~IE NT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager Ortiz, Chief of Police ~) Pete T.A. Nicassio, Lieutenant SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $15,500.00 FROM THE 2003 CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM (CLEEP) GRANT AWARD FUND BALANCE INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1366702-5603, FOR SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF TVVO (2) PEOPLE TRANSPORTERS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT FROM SEGWAY, OF ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA. RECOMMENDATION: The Police Department recommends that the Council approve the appropriation of $15,500.00 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award Fund balance into account No.1366702-5603, for the purchase of two (2) People Transporters and related equipment from Segway, of Anaheim, CA. The approximate expenditure total: $15,500.00 (the final cost will be determined through the Purchasing Department). BACKGROUND: The CLEEP award allows for the purchase of equipment and law enforcement related technologies. The Segway People Transporter is a battery operated, two wheeled, gyroscopically balanced vehicle that look somewhat like a chariot. They are able to carry an officer in the standing position with little or no chance of falling. They are currently in use by numerous law enforcement agencies throughout the United States for specialized patrol and enforcement. They allow for high visibility and rapid response. They are to be used primarily at Victoria Gardens, but can also be used as needed throughout the City. These transporter are approved as Homeland Security devices. -2- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $1,501 AND ABOVE The below information is provided in supped of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. Vendor: ~-)¢~ LLt3,~ Commodity/Serw?ce: ~ Estimated expenditure: $ Extent of market search conducted: Date: Your Name: ~¢~L~ Price Reasonableness: Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar' contract actual arrangements? NO DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or servicbs that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested), If needed, attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE ~-q THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE [---~(check one). 1. [ I SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed). 2. I I THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum). Single/Sole Source Justification Form Page 2 3.1 I 4.1 I THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memoraodum with details of specialized function or application). UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue.) THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request). NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM, The undei'signed rbquests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole sourc~/~r the service or material~. Depadment Head:I/~, ,~/1~_.~ C. ~ ~.~.,.)~ Department:[~ . '~, I v"lAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S DISAPPROVE Comments: $1,501 - $19,999 APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: $20,000 AND ABOVE See comments above by Purchasing Division Attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Date: Segway I Business Solutions I Police and Private Security Page 1 of 2 Sitemap Help Search ContaotUs GET MOVING: Home "> Segway HT ~ Business Solutions -~ Police and Private Security HOME SEGWAY HT A Closer Look Models & Specifications Accessories & Parts -> Business Solutions Case Studies Commercial Dealers Customer List Increase Productivity Robotic Mobility Platform Personal Solutions University Solutions SHOP CONNECT SUPPORT ABOUT US THE SEGWAY HT IS ON PATROL FOR POLICE AND PRIVATE SECURITY. The Segway~ Human Transporter (HT) places you a head above the crowd. That means you can be seen when you want your presence felt. And you have superior sight lines in parking lots and in crowded areas. [Enter ZlP code ] [] ~-~Manufacturing and the Segway HT []Police and the Segway HT Segway HT I~-lKeeping Up Has Never Been So Easy [] Print Friendly Version ~?¢~ Email to a Friend BECOME MORE APPROACHABLE The Segway HT is the ultimate icebreaker. Its mere presence facilitates conversation and encourages effective community policing. You're more approachable than you are in a cruiser or on a bike. And you get all the attention of horseback patrols without any of the feeding, grooming or housekeeping. COVER MORE GROUND IN LESS TIME Got a lot of area to patrol and fewer officers to cover it? The Segway HT can move you, smoothly and quietly, at 2-3 times walking speed. It can easily double the amount of area you can cover, and can transition immediately from walking speed (3 mph) to sprinting speed (12.5 mph) when you need to get somewhere fast without causing alarm. Approved Homeland Security Device POLICE AND SECURITY CASE STUDIES Police City of Chicago Police Department The Chicago Police Department was looking for a more efficient way for its officers to patrol O'Hare International Airport and provide a secure environment to the 200,000 people who move through the facility each day. The department employed Segway HTs to patrol vast distances in the airport terminals and respond quickly to security issues. Ventura County Sheriff's Department - Bomb Squad Disc(~ver how the Segway HT helps a police department's bomb squad react better http://www.segway.com/segway/police_and_security.html 5/11/2005 Segway Orange County 1187 N. Tustin Ave. Anaheim, CA 92807 Name / Address Victoria Gardens Mall 7743 Kew St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Estimate Date Estimate # J 5/l 1/2005 05110502 Project Description Qty Rate Total Segway Hr il 80, Midnight Blue, Lilon Extended Range Batteries 2 4,995.00 9,990.00T Bag, Lover Cargo Structure, i & e-Series, pair 2 399.95 799.90T Bag, Upper Cargo Structure i & e-Series 2 135.00 270.00T Lock Kit, Wheel, Kryptonite 2 17.95 35.90T Headlamp, ARC with Bracket & Fast Charger Kit 2 419.95 839.90T 2-year extended warran[y (3-year total) 2 800.00 1,600.00T Hitch Hauler, 2 inch Receiver 2 319.95 639.90T This is the proposal you requested Subtotal $14,175.60 Sales Tax (7.75%) $1,098.61 Total $15,274.21 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A CoI'4IqU NITY c~I~DVICE& SlaffReport DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department, the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and the Planning Division. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: Contractor working on punch lists. Continuing work on exterior monument signs and exterior'finishes and furnishings. Dedication is scheduled for May 21st. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · Contractor installing bridge element and working on the final area to receive landscape material. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: Building construction proceeding well. Theater Basement - Working on layout and trenching the remaining theater footings. Event Center - Receiving and setting steel. Library - Installing library window block wall. Backfilling library stem walls. Continuing to set library steel and decking. Backfilling and fine grading library slab on grade. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Victoria Arbors Park: · Continuing hardscape and landscape installation. Finishing gazebo roof. Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail: · Grove to Base Line: Engineering staff is working on grant application under the state's Bicycle Transportation Account funding to design and construct. · Base Line Road to Amethyst: Planning staff has applied for Safe Route to School funds for the Base Line Road to Amethyst reach. Amethyst to Archibald: Funded with $272,000 in state's Bicycle Transportation Account money and local matching funds (beautification fees). Anticipate advertising for construction bids in May 2005 and completing construction September 2005. Archibald to Haven: On March 16, 2005, the SANBAG Plans and Programs Committee (which includes Mayor Pro Tem Williams) recommended approval of $954,900 in Transportation Development Act Funds (Article 3). Assuming SANBAG Board final approval in April, it is estimated that this segment could be completed within 12 months. Haven to 1200' east of Etiwanda Avenue: Funded with $3.7 million federal STE grant money and local matching funds (beautification fees). City's environmental consultant, LSA Associates, Inc. is working on a response to Caltrans corrections to various environmental documents to obtain the federal environmental clearance. This is a crucial step that is required before we can get our allocation of the grant funding. Two short seqments of the trail have been constructed in Rancho Cucamonga along Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard in conjunction with the construction of Central Park Phase I and Day Creek Fire Station, respectively. Both of these are "re-routes" to new signalized crossings of these busy streets. The Planning Department and City Attorney have almost concluded negotiations with Joseph Filippi Winery on an agreement that would allow then to plant vineyards as an intedm use down the middle of the railroad corridor. SANBAG, who owns the corridor, requires that the middle 45 feet be reserved for future transit. The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation on October 13, 2004 approved use of their non-profit organization to become a donation collector for this important trail project. To date we have raised $646 in donations. The Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail have formed a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and is working on a newsletter. Outdoor recreation retailer REI has expressed a strong desire to support this trail project through their community service program of volunteers who do trail construction and maintenance. At REI's Tour de Rancho bike ride, event held April 3, 2005, staff manned a booth with information about Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. Representatives from the Planning and Community Services Departments met with REI's special events specialist to brainstorm ideas for events promoting the trail. If REI awards 155 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 their grant, a special event could be held at their store. A charity shopping night could be held in conjunction with REI's movie night where REI would donate a percentage of their sales profits to the trail. Another idea is to film a promotional video, which could include interviews at the City's first groundbreaking or grand opening ceremony that could be shown as a public service announcement on RCTV3. Etiwanda Railway Station Property: The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan identifies the station as a high priority "signature trailhead". The Engineering Department has begun using the station property for public works maintenance activities. Site Clean-up: Work completed. Next phase will be the historic depot building, pending funding availability, starting with repairing roof, then environmental clean-up (e.g., removal of asbestos, lead paint, and mold). Etiwanda Depot: A structural engineer has inspected the depot and is preparing a report on needed work. Burglar alarms have been installed in the station building; however, there are no fire sPrinklers in the building. Engineering Department has estimated it would cost approximately $253,000, including fire sprinklers, to bring station up to code for occupancy by Public Works staff. $50,000 in Community Development Block Grant construction funds approved in FY2004-05, mostly for demolition of accessory structures on property. Mayor and staff met with restaurateur who is interested in leasing Station building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before going any further, City Council policy discussion needed regarding desired uses for property. If City wishes to sublease Station, or a portion thereof, to a commercial business, then a Request for Proposals should be issued. · Community Garden: Conceptual garden plan is complete. Architerra agreed to donate their services to prepare community garden construction plans. Alternative Land Use Concepts: The Planning Department will be contracting for the preparation of three alternative schemes to provide the basis for consideration for the entire 4 +/- acre property site. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: The Senior Center hosted a Mother's Day Brunch on Saturday, May 7, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. We honored those mothers and grandmothers that were unable to share this special day with their children. Come join us for warm company, good food, and great entertainment. Reservations were required as seating was limited. · Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, May 23, 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Trips and Tours: California Strawberry Festival, May 15, 2005. The delicious heart-shaped fruit of Oxnard is ripe and the California Strawberry Festival is ready to tempt the taste buds of Southern Californians everywhere. One of the nation's most popular weekend celebrations, the event is held May 14th and 15th and pays tasty tribute to the luscious fruit garnered from the City's Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 bountiful 6,600 berry acres. Presented by the California Strawberry Festival Committee, the multi-faceted event serves up a menu of delectable strawberry delights from strawberry pizza and shortcake to chocolate dipped and more, along with non-stop entertainment, and participatory activities for berry lovers of all ages. Cost: $34.00 per person. Human Services: The Doctor Is In: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. presented the following lectures at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center in May: -Chest Pain: Is it your heart? - Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 12:00 p.m. -How to Prevent Hip Fracture - Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. will present the following lectures at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center in June: -Polypharmacy: Are you on too many pills? - Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 12:00 p.m. -Dizziness: Is it your brain or ears? - Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Health Screeninq: A free health screening was held on Tuesday, May 10, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Health assessments were conducted by nurses from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health to individuals 60 years and better, and included the following: health history, pulse, blood pressure, height, weight, hemoglobin and blood sugar. Counseling and referrals were also available. The next free health screening will be on Tuesday, June 14, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible residents at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income are required. Our next distribution date will be: Monday, June 6th. Home Maintenance Services: The Oldtimers Foundation provides seniors with an on-going home maintenance service. Services include minor plumbing, electrical and carpentry repairs. For more information, call the Oldtimers Foundation at (909) 622-4493. Wellness Fair: The 4th annual Rancho Cucamonga Community Collaborative Wellness Fair was on Saturday, April 30, 2005 from 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. and was located at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center. There were approximately 70 vendors that participated in the event. The fair offered a variety of health, safety and educational resources for all ages. All services and refreshments were free. Mini-Resource Directory: The Human Services Division has created a Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Mini-Resource Guide for the Inland Empire. The following programs/services are included: Abuse & Domestic Violence, Addiction Treatment, Anti- Gang Programs, Basic Needs & Emergency Assistance, Children & Youth, Consumer Information, Counseling & Mental Health, Education & Literacy, Employment & Volunteering, Family Planning & Parenting, Health & Medical Services, Hotiines, Housing, Legal Assistance and Senior Services. 15'1 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Volunteer Services: · The table below summarizes the Community Services Department volunteer usaqe for the month of March 2005, and totals from September through March 2005: Community Month: March 2005 Timeframe: September-March 2005 Services Department # of # of # of # of Division Volunteers Hours $ Value Volunteers Hours $ Value Senior Services 4~ 543 7,602 368 4,481 62,734 Human Services 36 121 1,694 271 932 13,048 Sports 4~ 312 4,368 839 14,120 197,680 Special Events 01 0 0 85 371 5,194 Performing Arts 8 54 756 55 358 5,012 Teens 59 381 5,334 391 2,155 30,17C Youth Programs 0 0 C 3 82 1,148 Administration 5 15 21 £ 3£ 9(; 1,26£ Totals 203 $1,426 19,964 2,04? 22,604 $316,45( Based upon rate of $14/hour. Teens: · The table below and on the next page summarizes teen proqram attendance for the month of April 2005: Program/Activity Attendance - April 2005 Teen Center 503 Homework Room Closed for repairs Spring Fling Dance 280 TRAC - Babysitting 106 participants; 20 volunteers TRAC - Monthly activities 37 participants TRAC - Snack Bars 6 volunteers Spruce Skate Park 765 Teen Connection 45 volunteers; 109.5 hours Career Expo 2,100 Teen Trips - Spring break took place during the 2nd week of April. Sixty-seven (67) teens enjoyed a trip during their break to Magic Mountain. The Spruce Skate Park - Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws and upcoming major events in other cities. During the month of May, Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) members will visit a Senior Assisted Living Facility and will participate in a fun game of bingo with the residents. Our food distribution to those in need took place on May 10t~ at our Lady of Mount Carmel Church. May 18th is our last TRAC meeting for the year until the fall. On May 19th our Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Annual TI{AC Volunteer Recognition Ceremony will take place at the City's Park and Recreation Commission meeting. REAL (Rancho Cucamonqa, Etiwanda, Alta Loma, Los Osos) Hi.qh School Advisory Committee continues to meet monthly to plan and develop new programming for high school students. The committee anticipates having some really fun and exciting activities planned for summer. Youth Activities: Playschool registration for our winter session is currently at 720 students in 47 classes. Waiting lists still exist for some of our classes. April's Playschool attendance was 11,156. Our annual Playschool graduation will take place on Tuesday, May 31st from 6:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. at Los Osos High School. Youngsters participating in the Mobile Recreation Proqram, "Fun on the Run" cannot wait to do all the fun games and crafts that have been planned for each park. Two hundred and eighty-one (281) children attended our Mobile Recreation program during the month of April. A special Mobile Rec Birthday Party (our 4th) was held on April 27th at Old Town Park. Participants partied to a "Super Hero" theme and even had the opportunity to meet Spider Man! Two hundred (200) community members attended our birthday bash and had a great time. The table below illustrates our park locations and program timeframe during the spring (April 4th through June 10th) session. Weekday Park Location Program Time Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Tuesday Hermosa Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Wednesday Old Town Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Thursday Ellena Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Friday Windrows Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Lewis Partnership: Kids Club operates Monday through Friday from 2:30 p.m. until 4:30pm at Del Mar Apartments, Terra Vista, Evergreen and Carmel on alternating days of the week. This after school Club is for youngsters, ages 6-12. Attendance continues to be strong totaling 270 youngsters during the month of April. · Lewis Operating Corp. has discontinued their Teen Center program at the apartment complexes due to space availability. Youth Sports: · The table below and on the next page summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity Pee Wee Soccer Inland Valleys Youth Track and Field - Meet - 250 3-5/boys & girls 25 65 8-14/boys & girls N/A Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Youth Volleyball 65 8-14/boys & girls 8 Cucamonga Middle School - 35 6-13/boys & girls N/A Youth Sports Camp Cucamonga Middle School 20 8-adult N/A (CMS) Judo Cucamonga Middle School 120 8-14/boys & girls 8 (CMS) Youth Volleyball Practice RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 609 Youth Basketball 1,105 Adult Racquetball 429 Youth Racquetball 88 Adult Volleyball 23 Youth Volleyball 16 Jazzercise 1,200 · The table below summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Racquetball 20 Adult/Male & Females N/A Basketball (full court) 260 Adult/Males 26 Basketba (3-on-3) 70 Adult/Males 14 Adult Sports: · The table below summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,736 171 Males/Females Tennis 25 N/A Males/Females · There are three (3) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of May at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · The Sports Advisory Committee met on May 11,2005. The fall (August 1, 2005 - January 31, 2006) field request forms were reviewed at this meeting. Special Events: · Staff is busy planning for our long awaited Central Park Dedication. On Saturday, May 21st we will be conducting two ribbon cutting ceremonies at the facility; one for the James L. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Bruite Senior Center and the other for the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center. The schedule for the day's festivities include: 9:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10:30-2:30 p.m. James L. Brulte Senior Center Dedication Ceremony Goldy S. Lewis Community Center Dedication Ceremony Community Open House featuring self-guided tours, special occasion and activity/program showcases, entertainment and light refreshments. North Town Housing Development Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department sponsored our annual Cinco de Mayo celebration again this year. The event was held at Old Town Park on May 7, 2005 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Entertainment, food booths, face painting, game booths, pony rides, inflatable rides and activities and much more were all be pad of this fun-filled community event. · The City's 2005 4th of July Fireworks Spectacular "Liqhts of Freedom" will be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on Monday, July 4th. Stadium gates will open at 7;00 p.m. and live on-field entertainment will start at 7:30 p.m. Our fireworks show will begin at 9;00 p.m. This year all tickets sales will be handled through the Quakes. Advance ticket sales will begin on June 1st and will continue through July 3rd or whenever the event sells out. Tickets will be for assigned seats so there will be no need for families to rush into the Stadium to save their seats. Pre-sale tickets are $5.00 per person. Tickets on July 4th will be $8.00 per person. Tickets will be available at the Epicenter Ticket Box Office, on-line or by calling the Quakes Box Office at (909) 481-5252. Our Celebration will also include a Fun Zone for children with interactive run rides and games. The Fun Zone will be open from 4:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. Ticket price is $5.00 per child for unlimited rides. Tickets will be available at the Fun Zone gates only on July 4th. There will be no pre-sale tickets for the Fun Zone. · Other events we are currently in the creating and planning process for include: Concerts in the Park, Movies in the Park. Cultural and Performing Arts: · The City presented their first adult-oriented community theatre production with the April presentation of Kander & Ebb's musical revue "The World Goes Round". Eleven adults and three teens comprised the cast and, for the first time, attracted an ail-adult audience. The show was presented at the RC Senior Center, which will soon become the RC Theatre Arts Center, a temporary location for the City's performing arts programs until the opening of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center in 2006. Over 500 audience members attended the show, in the intimate performance space which seats up to 80, over the eight-performance run. The City received several emails following the closing of the show encouraging the creation of more productions of this nature. A variety of new classes and workshops began mid April as part of the new RC Theatre Arts Academy. The most popular programs include Beginning Acting for Adults, RC Children's Chorus, Scene Study, and Youth Theatre Workshop, which filled to capacity. Other programs include Musical Theatre Workshop, Character Make-Up and Design, Beginning Acting for Kids, and Singing for a Lifetime. A total of 124 participants registered for the Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 spring session. The programs are offered at the soon-to-be RC Theatre Arts Center, currently the RC Senior Center. New and expanded programs will be offered in the academy for the summer session. Auditions were held in April for the formation of the City's newest performance group called Showstoppers. Ten youngsters, eight girls and two boys, were selected to become the City's performance ambassadors who will learn a variety of musical numbers to perform at City and community events and activities. Don Cloud an accomplished music director, composer & performer, assisted by choreographer Parris Aguirre, directs the Showstoppers Performance Troupe. Showstoppers will make their first appearance at a City event at the July 4th Spectacular at the Epicenter. This summer's community theatre presentation will be the beloved and well-known tale of "Cinderella", with music by Richard Rodgers and lyrics & book by Oscar Hammerstein I1. This production will be directed by Barbara Hinrichsen who also directed past productions for the Citv including "The Music Man," "Once Upon a Mattress," "Bye, Bye Birdie," and 'q'he Sound of Music.' Audit ons for C~ndereila w~ll be held on May 5 and May 7 at the RC Theatre Arts Center (the current home of the RC Senior Center) at 9791 Arrow Route. The summer musical typically includes a large cast of youth, teens and adults, with approximately 60-70 cast members from the community. The show will presented at the Los Osos High School Theatre on July 15, 16, 17, 22, 23 & 24. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of April 2005: Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use Red Hill 2,355 46 51 193 Heritage 1,126 21 23 82 Milliken 360 12 15 51 Hermosa 390 15 16 56 Coyote Canyon 375 10 15 38 Courtyard 200 I 1 9 Amphitheatre 104 3 3 11 TOTAL 4,930 '108 '124 440 Equestrian Participants* 340 7 13 31 Spectators: 105 · Equestrian participants include drop-in use. - The table below and on the next page displays buildinq rental and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of April 2005: Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Rentals 91 bookings 510 Lions East Building 528 facility hours 9,762 Lions West Rentals 799 bookings 4,065 Lions West Building 741 facility hours 15,663 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Activity Program Number Attendance Contract Classes 247 classes 18,350 (Winter session) Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: · Staff is working with the following applicants for upcominq rentals and activities: Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Memorial Ron Ives Bike Rodeo - June 4, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - All Star Practice and Game - June 6th and 8th, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremony - June 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. National Adult Baseball Association - Champion Games- June 18, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. City - 4th of July Celebration - July 4, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Complex. Quakes/Principal - Family Fun Fast - July 6, 2005 - Epicenter Softball Fields and Exterior Concourse Area. ~, Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meetin,q of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, April 21,2005. The following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting: Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. Update on the Central Park project. Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project. Update on Epicenter activities. Consideration of field allocation proposal for youth sports groups for fall/winter 2005/2006 season. > Annual TRAC recognition program. > Annual review of "Proof of Residency Requirements Policy" and its impact on City programs. · On June 6, 2005, the City Council and Park and Recreation Commission will hold a joint meetinq to discuss items of mutual interest. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS. RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE May 18, 2005 Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The Executive Committee and the Foundation Board of Directors will next meet on Wednesday, June 8, 2005. Agenda items for these meetings are currently being identified. Respect Kevin M, ully submitted, :Ardle Community Services Director J~e O'Neil / B.~r. ad Buller v City Engineer City Planner k[COMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncil~StaffReports~2OOS~update5,18, 05. doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: May 18, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tecl~nician~ SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL RESERVES FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1025001-5602 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to negotiate a contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure to be funded from Capital Reserves funds, Account No. 1025001-5602. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, however, no bids were received at the May 3, 2005 bid opening for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $20,000.00. Pursuant to the Public Contract Code, when no bids are received, City Council may authorize City Staff to negotiate a contract. Staff will return to Council with a recommendation regarding results of the negotiation. Respectfully submitted, ( City Engineer WJO:JD/RO:ls Attachment AVF ~ANYAN OT~ ~T G'TH 5T ~TH 5T ONT^~IO CITY UMIT t=P-.OJ ECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMON~fA FAMILY SPORTS ~'rati GKNERATOR ENCLOSURE VICINITY MAP C h 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE 210 FREEWAY EASTBOUND ON-RAMP SUBMI'I-rED BY AIM ALL STORAGE 210, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 16648, and authorizing the City Clerk to sign and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract No. 16648, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2004, for the division of 7.8 acres into eight (8) total lots, seven (7) Single Family lots and one (1) lot for the purpose of a public storage facility. The Developer, Aim All Storage 210, LLC, has previously submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements, with Development Review DRC2003-00850. City Council approved this project, agreement and security on January 5, 2005. lq7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16648 - AIM ALL STORAGE SR210, LLC May 18, 2005 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office, along with approved agreements and securities for DRC2003-00850. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office (DRC2003-00850). Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MB:pjb Attachments LEMON VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ~T~EET Location ST . RINGST ~TH ST City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Tract No. 16648 Title: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: 1_ RESOLUTION NO. O *,~'" J ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16648 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16648, submitted by Aim All Storage, 210, LLC and consisting of 8 lots located on the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 28, 2004, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16648 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16648 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. R A N CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Slaff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16487, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK AVENUE AND LAUREL STREET, SUBMITTED BY OASIS HOMES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 16487, accepting the subject agreement and securities, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tentative Parcel Map 16487, located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 7), was approved by the Planning Commission on April 14, 2(~04. This project is for single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes. The Developer, Oasis Homes, Inc., is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond $ 9,300.00 $ 4,650.00 151 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 16487 May 18, 2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Willi~tm J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CA:dlw Attachments ?~R~EL ~ / / P~ROEL I PARCEL 1 FOR 1 .20 ACRES N 'rm',~,,--t~ M .... I ~'5 'B 7 .... CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA E~NGINEERING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. ~),~'-/~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16487, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16487, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc., and consisting of 1.20 acres of land for single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium Purposes, located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7)was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on April 14, 2004; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16487 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities by Oasis Homes, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No. 16487 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16487 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PM 16487 March 18, 2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the trlevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Oasis Homes, Inc., a California Corporation The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 11236 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 124 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 68 AND 69 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 PM 16487 PARCEL 1 / · =~.s2' 1.20 ACRES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N ~TNGINR. I~[NG DIVISION /5g Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004~2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 PM16487 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004~2005) For Project:SUBTPM 16487 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 1 SLD # 2 I Community Trail Turf Landscaping DGSF SF Non-Turf SF Trees EA LMD # 3B 9 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 2 L 3B 1 2.4 1.2 1.2 B-2 PM16487 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessmen Assessmen Assessmen Land Use Unit Type Units t t t Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16487) is: 1.2 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. -- $423.36 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004~05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessmen Assessmen Assessmen Land Use Unit Type Units t t t Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercia I Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16487) is: 1.2 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. -- $42.65 Annual Assessment C-1 PM 16487 / ~ / STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessmen Assessmen Assessmen Land Use Unit Type Units t t t Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16487) is: 1.2 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $61.68 Annual Assessment C-2 PM 16487 THE CITY OF I~A N C H 0 C U CA~I ONC. A SlaffReport DATE: June 1, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Candyce BurneR, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00173 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON - A request to designate the Buehler House as a Designated Local Landmark, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208-131-12. Related file: Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179. MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2005-00179 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Buehler House, currently applying for Historic Landmark Status, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208-131-12. Related file: Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommends designation of the Buehler House as a Designated Local Landmark and approval of a Mills Act Agreement by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Mills Act Agreement. BACKGROUND: The proposed designated landmark at 9650 San Bernardino was built as part of a group of turn of the century residences built on smaller City lots near the Cucamonga town center for business owners and merchants. The home was purchased by Walter A. Buehler in 1920. Mr. Buehler established the Buehler Tank Works, which was a major local employer of the community during World War II. ANALYSIS: The attached Historic Preservation Commission staff report provides a detailed analysis of the historical and cultural significance of the Buehler House. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. City Planner " BB:CB\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated April 13, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173 Mills Act Agreement for Mills Act Application DRC2005-00179 THE CITY OF i~ANCflO CUCAHONGA 'II StaffRe rt DATE: April 13, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Candyce Burnett, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00173 -AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON - A request to designate the Buehler House as a Designated Local Landmark, located at 9650 San Bemardino Road- APN: 0208-131-12. Related file: Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179. MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2005-00179 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Buehler House, currently applying for Historic Landmark Status, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN 0208-131-12. Related file: Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173. BACKGROUND A. Historical Si.qnificance: The 'Buehler" home was constructed pre 1913 by an unknown Amhitect and Builder near the Cucamonga town c~nter. The dwelling is part of a group of tum of the century residences built on smaller City lots instead of large agricultural lots · that were standard in Cucamonga. The memhants and business owners lived in these homes because of their proximity to their businesses. In 1920, Walter A. Buehler purchased the home and lived there with his wife Lillian and their two sons and two daughters until 1944. He established Buehler Tank Works, which was a. major local industry and employer of the community during World War II. Site 'Characteristics: The house sits on an 11,880 square foot parcel (.27 acre) on the north' side of San Bernardino Road as.part of a group of tum of the century residences, surrounded by residential and commercial areas. The land use zoning of the site and the surrounding area is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwellings per acre). Bo ANALYSIS Genera!: The house was first surveyed in 1987 (see Exhibit 'D"). The house is a two-story, wood-framed building with a composite shingle roof. It is rectangular in shape with wood clapboard siding and double hung windows. An addition appears to have been ITEMS A & B HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00173 - AMANDA LOPEZ - CASTANON April 13, 2005 Page 2 added on to the west elevation of the dwelling in the late 1920s; with the exception of the front door and the 1920s addition, the home retains its original construction. Landmark Designation: The subject site qualifies for landmai'k designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical, cultural, neighborhood, and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings section. The requested designation is for the structure that is greater than 50 years in age. The purpose of the designation is to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate a significant feature that contributes to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga. Mills Act Aqreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference (Exhibit C). The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the property owner to reinvest the money saVed from the reduced property tax on the improvements. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. Staff estimates the property tax savings to the owner could be as much as $1,368 per year. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate .at the time of the assessment. D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption.of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS F°R FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Findinq 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, 'style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: Fact/s: The property is an excellent example of life in eady Cucamonga, as the residents needed to locate themselves towards the Cucamonga town center to be closer to their businesses. The dwelling is part of a grouping of structures built at the tum of the century on smaller City lots that was different from the previous development of large agricultural lots. Findinq 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact/s: The dwelling was built pre 1913. Findinq 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00175 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON Apd113,2005 Page 3 FacEs: Walter A. Buehler lived in the dwelling from 1920 until 1944. He established Buehler Tank Works, a major local industry, and was a large employer during World War II. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: F ndin.q !.: The proposed landmark materially benefits the histodc character of the neighborhood. FacEs: Findin,cl 2: The proposed landmark contributes to the character of the histodc neighborhood as part of a group of turn of the century homes and represents the evolution of small City lot development from large agricultural lots in eady Cucamonga. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. FacEs: The proposed Landmark is part of a larger group of historic dwellings located close to the original Cucamonga town center. CORRESPONDENCE: The Histodc Landmark designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173 and Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet City Planner BB:CB\ge Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Photographs of Buehler House Exhibit "C" - Agreement Schedule Exhibit "D" - Histodc Resources Inventory (Completed 1987) Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2005-00173 DRC2005-00173 ~ ESTAClA 300 0 300 600 Feet ~ I EXHIBIT "A" DRC2005-00173 SUBJECT PARCEL 300' NOTIFICATION PARCELS 9650 San Bernardino Road City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission MILLS ACT AGREEMENT sUpPLEMENTAL: (To be completed by the Applicant) Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years. List them in order of owner's priority. YEAR IMPROVEMENT 2005- Replace/repair siding, Paint exterior, re-roof home and garage building, 2009 replace/repair windows 2005- Remove chain link fencing and replace with picket fencing, re-sod and 2007 landscape, tdm trees 2005- . Restore outbuildings including brick stove and outdoor kitchen area 2015 I certify that I am presently the legal owner of the subject property. Fqrther, I acknowledge the supplemental informatiOn on this form will be used as an exhibi~.attached to the Mills ActAgreemen~ ~ /"',~'~Z' "~--~ '- Date: S~ur~i~ -' /' J EXHIBIT "C" OEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANO RECREATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IHABS UTM: "' ~ 1730 - 51 - { . Se,.No. HAER Loc SHL No, NR Status __ A 11-445225-3775170 C 8 D iDENTIFICATION Pool House 1. Common name: 2. Historic ne_me: _ 3. S~reet or rural address: Buehler House 9650 San Bernardino Road City Rancho Cucamonga Parcelnumber:_ 0208-131-12 91730 Counw_ San Bernardino 5. Present Owner: Wendell clw Rancho Cucamonga 6. Present Use: _ Residence and Donna Pool .Address:_ 9650 San Bernardino Rd._ zip 91730 Ownership is: Public _Private X _ , .Original usa: _ Resi dance Architectural swle: N/A ' Briefly de~ribe the present phy~cal appea~nce of Ga site or structure and describe any major alterations from i~ original condition: A tWO StOry, rectangular structure of wood construction. Roof is medium gable roof, side gable domer with 'composite shingles. Rafters and eaves are exposed. Knee braces are located at the corners of the walls. Siding is wood clapboard. Hindows are double hung, with wide wood. ]intel and molding and narrow wood ]ugsill. Side windows in groupings of two. Doo~ is not o~iginal and is covered wi~h an aluminum screen do~r. Appears to have been an addition made along ~he wes~ side of the structure, since a break in'the siding occurs. Roof is con- ~inuous with no apparent change in rOOf line over this' addition. Foundation material is rough cast block with poured concrete on west side of s[ruc~ure. Concrete s~eps extending straigh~ Out from the door complete the s~ruc~ure. Landscaping features include three ]a~ge trees in the front and rear, a concrete retaining wall along side-walk and along driveway ex[ending ~0 reef Of property. Driveway extends to a single story garage of corrugated iron a~ rear of property. Structure is tied into street scene by by large mature palm trees extending en- tire length of street. DESCRIPTION 7a. 7b. EXHIBIT "D" At~ach Photo Envelope Here 8. Construction da~e: Estimated ~re 1913 Factual __ .. 9. Architect_ Unknown 10. BuilderL Unknown 1 I. ApproX. pmpertV size .(in feet) Fron~ ~6 Oepth~ 1~ D~e(s) of en~o~ ~OtO9r~(s July 1987 - DPR 523 (Rev. 11/85) '/?/ 13. Condition: Excellent Good '~..~._._ Fair Deteriorated No longer in iXistence 14. Alterations: · Addition on west side of house sometime after 1929. 15. Surroundings: (Check more than oneif necessary) Open land Residential. X Industrial Commercial X Other: 16. Threats to site: None known X~Private development Zoning Vandalism Public Works projec~ Other: Scattered buildings Densely built-Bp X 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical amd/or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site.) This structure is significant to the' community, since it is one of a group of structures built around the turn of the century that were near the Cucamonga town center. Previously, most homes were located on large tracts of agricultural land. This group was built on smaller, city type lots. Merchants or business owners lived in these homes that were located near to their bu£inesses. The particular structure was the home of W. A. Buehler who established Buehler Tank Works, a major local industry that employed many people from the community. This industry was a very large employer during World War II. Buehler owned the house from 1920 until 1944. 20, Main theme of me historic resource: (If more than one is checked, number in order of importance.) Architectum Arts & Leisum Economic/Industrial .[~ Ex plorafion/Set~lement Government . Military Religion ~ocial/Educafion 21. Sources (List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews and their dates). "A Field Guide to American Houses:, Virginia and Lee McAlester; Sanborn Map Company Cucamonga Ma[~ Sept. 1913, November 1929 2~. Dateform prepared October 12~ 1987 By (name) Lynn Merril.1 Organization Addr~s: City z~p · Phone: Locadonal sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): /?2. · MASTER FILE HIST,.,..,'I~ :tESOURCES DATA ENCODIN(~ S NOTE: The numbers in parentheses indicate either the number of character~ (letters, numbers, punctuation marks, epaces) that may be entered or the nmnper of fines that may be checked. 1.' Ser. No. [730 - _ 5[- - CiW Zip (4) Form No. (1-4) Prop. No. (0-4) USGS Quad Map No. (4) 2452 i - 17) A I1 B D Property Name: Common Name (30): Pool House Historic Name (40}: Buehler House Parcel No, (0-17) 0208-131-12 10. Regis~'ation Status (1): __1) listed --date (8) / / ~4) may become eligible ~2) determined eligible -- __5) eligible local listing Year (2) __6).ineligible for above ~X3) appears eligible ~7) undetermined 11. Property Given Regisb'ation Status as (1): ~1) part of disaist X 2) individual properW __3) both of above 12. NR Class Category (1): _~,1) district --No. of properties (0-3) ~2) si~ X3) building ._4) structure __5) ob|ect 4. Address: 9650 Number (0-5) San Bernardino Rd. Street Name (4-20) Nearest Cross Street (0-21X) _ Rancho Cucamonqa City/Town (3-20} 9[730 Zip code (5) County 3-letter designatm (3) Vicinity of City/Town (~/) SBD 5. Type of Ownership (1-7): __1) unknown X 4) private 2) federal 5) county ~ 3) state 6) city 7) special district 8. Present Uso (1-6): ~1) unknown 4) private non-comm. 2) commercial ~ 5) public '~[--3) residential 6) none 7. Year of Initial Consa'ucl~en: individual Property'(4) pre 1913 District (8}. -- 8, Architect(s) (0-25): unknown 13. Other Registration (o-g) 1)Historic Am. Big. Survey -~.6) Cal. Historical Landmark 2) Historic Am. Eng. Re~ _y.7) County Pt. of Hist. Interest ~3) National Hist. LandmarkL.X.8) Local Listing ~4) State Historic Park ~9) Counw/Regional Park ~5) other 14. Property At'tributes: __ 1) unknown X 2) sing. family brop. 3} muir. family prop. 4) ancillary big, ~5) hotel/motel 6) comm. big. 1-3 st. ~ 7) comm. big. over 3 st. ~ 8) indusaial big, ~ 9) public utility big- __10) theatre __11) engineering struct __12) civic auditorium __13) cmnty cntr/$oc, hail __14) govemment big. __15) educational big. __16) religious big. --17) R/R depot --18) train __19) bridge ?0) canal/aqueduct ~1) dam ?2) lake/river/reservoir --23) ship ?4) lighthouse .--25) amusement perk __26) monumentYmurai/greveetone __27) folk art _28) street furniture __29) landscape architr. __30) trees/vegetation ._31) urban open space ._,32) rural open space __:)3) farm/ranch __34) military property __:35) CCC/INPA structure __36) ethnic minority property ethnic group (5-20) ~.37) highway/trail __38) women's property _..40) cemetery J9) osher Builder(s) (0-25): unknown ~"' 15. Amitemral Plans and Specifications: Yes X No 9. ' Year of Survey (2): 1987 OPI~ 660 (Rev. 12/83) RESOLUTION NO. 05-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2005-00173, DESIGNATING THEBUEHLER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9650 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-131-12. A. Recitals. 1. Amanda Lopez-Castanon filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On April 13, 2005, the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately .27 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 9650 San Bemardino Road. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 13, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: Fact/s: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic pedod, type, style, region, or way of life. The property is an excellent example of life in early Cucamonga, as the residents needed tolocate themselves towards the Cucamonga town center to be closer to their businesses. Fact/s: Findin~ 2: The dwelling is part of a grouping of structures built at the turn of the centu~ on smaller City lots that were different from the previous development of large agricultural lots. The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact/s: The dwelling was built pre 1913. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-02 DRC2005-00173 - AMAN DA LOPEZ-CASTANON Apdl 13, 2005 Page 2 Findin.q 3: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact/s: Walter A. Buehler lived in the dwelling from 1920 until 1944. He established Buehler Tank Works, a major local industry, and was a large employer during World War I1. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the character of the historic neighborhood as part of a group of tum of the century homes and represents the evolution of small City lot development from large agricultural lots in early Cucamonga. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or City. Fact/s: The proposed Landmark is part of a larger group of historic dwellings located close to the odginal Cucamonga town center. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation on the 13th day of April, 2005. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATI'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1'75 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-02 DRC2005-00173 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON April 13, 2005 Page 3 I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Histodc Preservation Commission held on the 13th day of Apdl 2005, bythe following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 5' / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2005-00173 DESIGNATING THE BUEHLER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9650 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0208-131-12. A. Recitals. 1. Amanda Lopez-Castanon filed an application for Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On Apdl 13, 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and recommended approval. 3. On June 1, 2005, the City Council held their meeting and approved Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part"A," of this Resolution are tree and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately .27 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 9650 San Bemardino Road. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including minutes of the public headng by the Histodc Preservation Commission on Apdl 13, 2005, wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: FACT FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural SiRnificance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. FacEs: The property is an excellent example of life in eady Cucamonga, as the residents needed to locate themselves towards the Cucamonga town center to be closer to their businesses. FacFs: The dwelling is part of a grouping of structures built at the turn of the century on smaller City lots that were different from the previous development of large agricultural lots. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2005-00173 - AMANDA LOPEZ-CASTANON June 1, 2005 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. FacEs: The dwelling was built pre-1913. Finding 3: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. FacEs: Walter A. Buehler lived in the dwelling from 1920 until 1944. He established Buehler Tank Works, a major local industry, and was a large employer during World War II. B. Neighborhood and Geoqraphic Settinq: Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. FacEs: The proposed landmark contributes to the character of the histodc neighborhood as part of a group of rum of the century homes and represents the evolution of small City lot development from large agricultural lots in eady Cucamonga. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or FacEs: The.proposed Landmark is part of a larger group of historic dwellings located close to the original Cucamonga town canter. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption (historical resource/restoration/rehabilitation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173. 6. The Mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RECORDZNG REQUESTED BY and when RECORDED HAIL TO: city clerk, City of Rancho cucamonga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 HISTORIC PROPER~f PRESERVATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of 3une 2005, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "city") and Amanda Lopez-Castanon (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"). WTTN ESS ETH : A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code section 50280, et seq. authorize cities to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance; (ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property, together with associated structures and improvement~ thereon, commonly known as the 8uehler House and generally located at the street address 9650 San Bernardino -1- Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property"). A legal description of the Historic Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference; (iii) On June 1, 2005, the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and, (iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of Division 1 of the california Revenue and Taxation Code. B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditiohs set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term of Aqreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on June 1. 2005, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2, below. 2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of nonrenewal i.~ mailed as provided herein. If either Owner or city desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal date of the Agreement. Unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least g0 days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by city to Owner at least 60 days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. Owner may make a written protest -2- of the notice. City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner of nonrenewal. If either City or Owner serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions: a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement. b. owner shall, where necessary, restore 'and rehabilitate the property according to the rules and regulations of the office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the applicant and approved by the City Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "C." c. owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the county Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, state Board of Equalization, and the city, as may be necessary to determine Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4.. Provision of Information of Corporation. Owner hereby agrees to furnish city with any and all information requested by the city which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms .and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as set forth in california Government code Sections 50280, et seq., may cancel this -3- Agreement if it determines that Owner breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property, city may also cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. In the event of cancellation, Owner may be subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. 6. Enforcement of Aqreement. zn lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, city may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within 30 days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then city may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. city does not waive any Claim of default by Owner if city does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in city's regulations governing historic properties are available to the city to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. NO waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement Shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereinunder. 7. BindinQ Effect of Aoreement. The Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, -4- and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. city and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that Owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner. 8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. TO city: city of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 civic Center Drive P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: city Planner To Owner: Amanda Lopez-Castanon 9650 San Bernardino Road Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 -5- g. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. Owner agrees to and shall hold city and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the city and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. c. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. ..... d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any. partyor parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. -6- e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of california. 10. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the city shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of san Bernardino. The Owner shall be responsible for any fees required by the County for recording this Agreement. 11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: william J. Alexander, Mayor Dated: By: Amanda Lopez-Castanon Dated: By: Owner -7- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , Kathy Scott, Deputy city Clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared WILLIAM 3. ALEXANDER, personally know to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) Kathy Scott Deputy City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga On the day of , 2005, before me Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and the by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the per~o~(~) acted execgted the instrument. . .... WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Amanda Lopez-Castanon 9650 San Bernardino Road Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 Mailing: Same as above Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: PTN SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC 3 TP lS R 7W BEG 345FT W OF INTERSECTION C/L SAN BDNO RD ANDARCH1BALD AVE TH N I80 FTTH W 66 FTTH S180 FTTH E 66 FTTO POB Exhibit "A" -9- THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its originally intended purpose. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8.Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction project. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall nqt be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not_destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Exhibit "B-i" -10- PROPERLY ~t4INTENANCE Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, similar items; such as automobiles, cans, containers, or 4. Stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas; Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location. EXHIBIT "B-2" -11- POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS For Amanda Lopez-Castanon 9650 San Bernardino Road Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation commission's staff. ITEM YEAR TASK 1. 2005-2007 2. 2005-2009 3. 2005-2015 Remove chain link fencing and replace with picket fencing. Re-sod and landscape, trim trees. Replace/repair siding, paint exterior, re-roof house and garage, replace/repair existing windows. Restore outbuildings including brick stove repairs and outdoor kitchen areas. EXHIBIT "C" -12- Assessor's office County of san Bernard/no APPLICATION FOR REASSESSMI~'r PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEABLE RESTRICTION (HI,~roRICAL) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: NAME OF OWNER: SITUS ADDRESS: 0208-131-12-0000 Amanda Lopez-Castanon 9650 San Bernardino Road. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 NOTE: You must attach a copy of the recorded .contra~ (or agreement). I 'certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury Under the laws of the State of California,· that the foregoing and all information herebn, including any accompanying statements or documents, is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and beltsf;.. Owner or Agent · ' . Date Phon~ · (8:00 s,~m.-4~O0 p,m.) A,P~091 . :. ' :1:". 31-20 ~AN Cfi 0 C U CAIVl 0 N GA CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 11,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jim Markman, City Attorney APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MATHIS & ASSOCIATES TO ASSIST THE CITY COUNCIL IN AN EVALUATION OF THE CITY MANAGER Recommendation It is respectfully recommended that Mathis & Associates be retained to assist the City Council in an evaluation of the City Manager for an amount not to exceed $5,000 and enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Mathis & Associates. Approve the appropriation of $5,000 from reserves to the General Overhead Account 1001002-5300 to pay for the services. Discussion At the request of the City Council, I contacted firms who have experience in assisting City Councils in performance evaluations of City Managers. Two firms submitted proposals, Mathis & Associates and CPS Executive Search. The following are the professional fees that the firms would charge to assist in the work. Mathis & Associates $5,000, including expenses CPS Executive Search $7,500, plus reimbursement of directly related expenses The process will include interviews, meetings with the City Council, and then with the City Council and the City Manager. The work will also include an evaluation of comparable compensation. The Mathis & Associates proposal as well as a Professional Services Agreement between the City and Mathis & Associates is attached. Page 2 City Manager Evaluation After reviewing the proposals, it is recommended that Mathis & Associates be retained. Mr. Mathis is available to begin the work immediately. Attachments AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement is entered into this day of ,2005 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and Mathis and Associates, a , by and through R. William Mathis, Ph.D. (sometimes collectively referred to as "CONSULTANT"). RECITALS A. CITY requires the performance of professional services necessary to conduct and provide in writing to the City Council, a comprehensive evaluation of CITY's City Manager, and related services. B. CONSULTANT represents that he is fully qualified to perform such services by virtue of his experience and the training, education and expertise, and that of his principals and employees. CONSULTANT further represents that he is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. C. It is the intent of the CITY and CONSULTANT in entering this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions applicable to CONSULTANT's performance of the services required by CITY, as described above. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows: 1. CONSULTANT'S SERVICES A. Scope of Services. CONSULTANT shall perform the services identified in CONSULTANT's Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, CONSULTANT shall conduct interviews, perform assessments, conduct or cause a salary survey to be conducted as directed by CITY, and shall conduct and provide to the CITY a comprehensive, written evaluation. Hereinafter, the services to be provided by CONSULTANT are collectively referred to as "the services". CITY shall have the right to request, in writing, changes in the scope of work or the services to be performed. Any changes mutually agreed upon by the parties, and any increase or decrease in compensation, shall be incorporated by written amendment to this Agreement, or by separate letter agreement. B. Time for Performance. CONSULTANT shall commence performance of the services at the rates and within the times set forth in Exhibit "A", upon receipt of CITY's verbal or written notice to proceed. RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION C. Standard of Performance. CONSULTANT shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations. D. Personnel. CONSULTANT represents that R. William Mathis, Ph.D., will personally perform the services required under this Agreement and all persons assisting CONSULTANT shall be qualified to assist in the performance of such services. R. William Mathis, Ph.D., shall have direct responsibility for management of CONSULTANT's services under this Agreement. E. Permits and Licenses. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain during the Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision of services under this Agreement. 2. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement shall commence upon CITY's providing CONSULTANT with the notice to proceed, and shall continue in effect until CONSULTANT has completed all services required hereunder to CITY's satisfaction, which period for completion shall not exceed sixty (60) days unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of sections 3. COMPENSATION CITY agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for the services provided under this Agreement, and CONSULTANT agrees to accept in full satisfaction for such services those amounts set forth in Exhibit "A." 4. METHOD OF PAYMENT Unless otherwise provided in Exhibit "A", CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice, on a monthly basis or less frequently, for the services performed pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall itemize the services rendered during the billing period and the amount due. Within ten business days of receipt each invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of any disputed amounts included on the invoice. Within thirty calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY shall pay all undisputed amounts included on the invoice. CITY shall not withhold applicable taxes or other authorized deductions from payments made to CONSULTANT. At any time during regular working hours, all records, invoices, and other materials accounting the services shall be available for review and audit by CITY. RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION 2 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All reports, documents or other written material ("written products") developed by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement shall be deemed to be works made for hire and all of the written products, including any and all intellectual property rights arising from their creation, shall be and remain the property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use or dissemination by CITY. To the extent any of the written products are found to not be works made for hire, then CONSULTANT hereby assigns all rights and ownership interest in the same to the CITY. 6. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT CONSULTANT will act hereunder as an independent CONSULTANT. This Agreement shall not and is not intended to constitute CONSULTANT as an agent, servant, or employee of CITY and shall not and is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture or association between CITY and CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that he shall not be entitled to receive any benefits or compensation except as expressly provided in this Agreement. 7. CONFIDENTIALITY All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by CONSULTANT or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by CONSULTANT without prior written consent by CITY, except as may be required by law. All CITY data shall be returned to CITY upon the termination of this Agreement. CONSULTANT's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST CONSULTANT hereby warrants for himself, his employees, and subcontractors that those persons presently have no interest and shall not obtain any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement. No person having such conflicting interest shall be employed by or associated with CONSULTANT in connection with services to be performed hereunder. CONSULTANT hereby warrants for himself, his employees, and subcontractors that no such person shall engage in any conduct which would constitute a conflict of interest under any CITY ordinance, state law or federal statute. 9. INDEMNIFICATION A. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold free and RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION 3 harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all tort liability, including liability for claims, suits, actions, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest and defense costs including expert witness fees, where the same arise out of, or are connected with, in whole or in part, the acts or omissions of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees or contractors in the performance of this Agreement, and which result in personal injury, death or property damage to any individual or entity, including the employees or officials of CONSULTANT. In addition to the foregoing, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers and employees from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees and costs to the extent the same are caused by negligence of CONSULTANT, or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees or contractors, in the performance of professional services pursuant to this Agreement. B. CONSULTANT's obligations under this or any other provision of this Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any workers compensation act or similar act. CONSULTANT expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to the CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. C. CITY does not waive any rights that it may possess against .CONSULTANT because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any ~nsurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense. CONSULTANT agrees that CONSULTANT's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. D. CONSULTANT agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against CITY by reason of the independent CONSULTANT relationship created by this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT's employees. CONSULTANT further agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement any amount due to CITY from CONSULTANT as a result of CONSULTANT's failure to promptly pay to CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION 10. INSURANCE A. CONSULTANT shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows: 1. Commercial General Liability Insurance with minimum limits of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000), or such other amount as agreed to in writing by CITY, for each occurrence and in the aggregate for any personal injury, death, loss or damage. 2. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) or such other amount as agreed to in writing by CITY, per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California. B. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subcontractors to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement. C. The policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of California and with a rating of at least A:VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide. D. CONSULTANT agrees that if he does not keep the insurance required in this Agreement in full force and effect, CITY may either immediately terminate this Agreement. E. Prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall file with CITY's Risk Manager a certificate or certificates of insurance, together with endorsements, showing that the insurance policies are in effect in the required amounts. F. CONSULTANT shall provide proof that policies of insurance expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. G. The general liability and automobile policies of insurance shall contain an endorsement naming CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds. All of the policies shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies cannot be canceled or reduced except on thirty (30) days' prior written notice to CITY. CONSULTANT agrees to require its insurer to modify the RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION certificates of insurance to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. H. The insurance provided by CONSULTANT shall be primary to any other coverage available to CITY. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not contribute with it. I. All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not prohibit CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT's employees, agents or subcontractors, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives all rights of subrogation against CITY. J. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be approved by CITY. At the option of CITY, CONSULTANT shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to CITY, or CONSULTANT shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CITY. K. Procurement of insurance by CONSULTANT shall not be construed as a limitation of CONSULTANT's liability or as full performance of CONSULTANT's duties to indemnify, hold harmless and defend under this Agreement. 11. MUTUAL COOPERATION A. CITY shall provide CONSULTANT with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information and assistance as is reasonably available for the proper performance of CONSULTANT's services. B. In the event any claim or action is brought against CITY relating to CONSULTANT'S performance in connection with this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall render any reasonable assistance that CITY may require. 12. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS CONSULTANT shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement for a period of at least three (3) years. CITY shall have access, without charge, during normal business hours to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities. RC-PSA~CITY MGR EVALUATION 13. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for any reason or for no reason on thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice to CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of such notice. CONSULTANT shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause. B. In the event of termination or cancellation of this Agreement by CITY, due to no fault or failure of performance by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT shall be paid based on the percentage of work satisfactorily performed at the time of termination. In 'no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to receive more than the amount that would be paid to CONSULTANT for the full performance of the services required by this Agreement. 14. FORCE MAJEURE CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any failure to perform if CONSULTANT presents acceptable evidence, in CITY's sole judgment, that such failure was due to causes beyond the control, and without the fault or negligence, of CONSULTANT. 15. NOTICES Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on: (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during CONSULTANT's and CITY's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as set forth below, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing. If to CITY: Attn: City of If to CONSULTANT: RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION 16. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANT shall not delegate, transfer, subcontract or assign its duties or rights hereunder, either in whole or in part, without CITY's prior written consent, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no effect. CITY shall not be obligated or liable under this Agreement to any party other than CONSULTANT. 17. ATTORNEY'S FEES in the event that CITY or CONSULTANT commences any legal action or proceeding for breach, or to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and provisions of any document incorporated by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT with respect to the subject matter herein. No other prior oral or written agreements are binding on the parties. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and executed by CITY and CONSULTANT. 19. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for any litigation shall be the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. 20. SEVERABILITY Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be vapid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement, is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. 21. CAPTIONS The captions used in this Agreement are solely for reference and the convenience of the parties. Said captions are not a part of the Agreement, in no way RC-PSA-CITY MGR EVALUATION bind, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provision, and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF CONSULTANT By: Mayor By: RC-PSA-ClTY MGR EVALUATION Exhibit A CONSULTANT' S PROPOSAL MATHIS & ASSOCIATES 3435 Valle Verde Drive · Napa, CA 94558 · Phone: (707) 252-2151 ,, Fax: (707) 252-1349 Dr. Mathis: mathisl~napanetnet O: mathis~,napanet.ne~ www. MathisAssociates,com March 16, 2005 James L. Markman, City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga Richards, Watson, Gershon P.O. Box 1059 Brea, CA 92822-1059 Dear Mr. Markman: Re: City Manager Evaluation 050317 Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for you and Council to review. Following is an explanation of my process: Phase I: The Performance Evaluation Process I meet with each Council member individually to conduct an extensive question-and- answer interview which lasts an hour to an hour and a half to ensure a thorough examination of all segments ofthe City Manager's responsibilities. Interview guidelines are established to ensure consistency and honest, candid responses are encouraged, based on an agreed upon rating scale. Responses are always summarized so that confidentiality and anonymity of individual comments are protected. In addition to the interview process, each Council member can fill out written personal evaluation forms. The City Manager is interviewed on background, issues, examination of city goals and objectives, Manager's accomplishments list, and current work objectives. The following issues are addressed when conducting the evaluation: · Pre-evaluation interviews and assessment - review background information for Council as well as analyze Council's goals, vision, and mission. · The City Manager's key relationships with the City Council, with all city staff, and with the public (private citizens and the business community). · The City Manager's responsibilities and individual abilities to meet these. · The City Manager's personal styles, such as communication, leadership qualities, flexibility, etc. · Specific programs, objectives, or assignments Council members feel are important to discuss with the City Manager. Phase I1: Data Gatherin.q and Summarizinq Once all of the interviews are conducted with the City Council, responses are gathered and summarized into one combined report and an overall rating is established. The contents of the evaluation are reviewed in a facilitated meeting between the Council and myself without the City Manager present, to combine opinions and ensure a high comfort level with the information to be shared with the City Manager. In the second part of the same session, the Council and City Manager discuss the evaluation with my assistance. During this discussion, the City Council is invited to present to the City Manager any additional comments or amendments to the evaluation. Contracts/compensation may be reviewed. The City Manager is then invited to comment and respond to the evaluation and is also asked to comment about the general working environment and City Council expectations. Schedulin.q: Two days to include one day for interviews and one day at least a week later for compilation of interview data and to present information to Council and City Manager in a closed Council session. I can start immediately. Cost: $5,000, including expenses. See enclosed Fee Schedule. Additional work will be billed on an hourly basis. Attached please find brochures on City Manager and City Attomey Evaluations, an article written by George Caravalho on my evaluation process, and another article I recently co-authored, "Don't Drop the Ball with your Council." Aisc, please visit my website at www. MathisAssociates.com for additional articles I have written and information about my services. I would be pleased to talk with you at your convenience. I can be reached by calling my office or on my call at 707-333-2095. I look forward to headng from you. Sincerely, R. William Mathis, Ph.D. Management Psychologist RWM:kk Enc. 2 MATHIS & ASSOCIATES 3435 Valle Verde Drive · Napa, CA 94558 · Phone: (707) ')52-2151 · Fax: (707) 25'~-1349 ]Dr. Mathis: mathisl~napanct.net O: mathis~napanct.nct www: MathisAssociates.com Fee Schedule Year 2005 Costs Daily Rate: Hourly Rate: Associate Consultants: Associate Consultant Travel Time: $2,000.00 plus expenses * $ 250.00 plus expenses $ 150.00 per hour plus expenses $ 75.00 per hour Please note that the cost is for 8 hours per day. Any additional hours beyond the scope of this proposal will be invoiced at the rate of $250.00 per hour. Expenses: Expenses will be invoiced at cost, including travel time, mileage, meals, lodging, telephone, mailing, printing, and supplies. Support service and word processing expenses will be billed at the rate of $55.00 per hour. Travel time is billed at $125/hour. Mileage is billed at $.48 per mile. DISC Personal Profiles are invoiced at $75.00 each. Proeram Description communication to take place iu a city i~ the perlbru~aucc 'evahla6on of ~l~e city's ~'~1~ manager by its City Council. Maihis & Associates proposes ~ha~ ~ be conlracted wifl~ your City to undertake a facilitated Cily Manager Ewduation by The key to snccess of this process is providing Che City CCm~cihnembers with the opportunity Io discl~ss the City candidly within lhe defined areas. Under theofl~er c~rcun~s~a~ces, ~lfis realm of ]imilcdvalue. The Conneil may group al)pr:riser,aud individual evahmJhm. All good City Managers want extensive, clear communication and feedback, and this process offers the only real opportunity for City Council to discuss/reflect back on the performance of the City Manager. The evaluation, conducted with the City Manager present at the facilitated session, focuses on the following two major categories: "Performance Factors" and "Strength and Areas Needing Improvements" Council s C ide to EValuating : YOur R. William Mathis, Ph.D. Mathis & Associates 3435 Valle Verde Drive Napa, CA 94558 Phone: 707/252-2151 Fax: 707/252-1349 E-Mail: Mathisl~napanet.net www. MathisAssociates.com City Ma'nager "A Progressive Approach to the Evaluation Process What Does Mathis & Associates Provide? A ~'m~ pai,' method fiw giving anmml feedback lo fl~e City ~anagc~-. A Lacihtated discussion with candid dialogue he,wee, Council and City Manager. Commil with a clear. A written perfin*nnaace review to be signed by all Commi]members. Clear ~oals and objective A mechanism to help divided Ccmm:fls throogh a ¢Hfficolt Ex~erieoced theilDamr wi~h 25 years of city eom~scli,g cxpen%,ce. Customize your evaluation by choosing.fi'om the.[bllowi,g options: Prior to evahmtion, consultant will consolidate, analyze and assess the following background information for Council. · :' Council's goals · :' Prior evalnations and recommendations · :. City Manager's yearly accomplishments · :' Vision or mission statements Council Teambuilding sessions. Individual interviews with each Conneilmember to establish performance appraisal concepts and parameters, and define objectives of the formal process. + Confidential comments in both a structured and candid format will be obtained prior to the evaluation session. Interview with the City Manager ISq conducted prior to the evaluation to discuss his/her issues. The consultant will also assist the City Manager in a self- evaluation during this step. This is helpful for City Councils who have not performed a thorough assessment in the pas~ Conduct a separate procedure to discuss tile issue of salary/benefil adjustment. · :' Council should always determine the amount of compensation separate fi'om tb~ evaluation/performance appraisal. Discussion with Mayor and Council on contract issues. · :' Special Benefits · :- Merit Issues · :' Termination Process A formal evaluatiou process facilitated by the consultant involving tile Mayor, the Council and the City Manager. PRODUCT Pn'e~en*ed Back To City C~muci~ ,F~:,' Signature And Placemen~ la Thc C~'y Manager's Personnel Manager Appraisals Can Be Nothing but a Benefit For nearly 20 years as city manager in three cities, one of the authors, George Caravalho, has insisted that city councils meet with him at least once a year for an evaluation process. During this period, he has seen many different reactions to holding such a session with the council. In some cases, the mayor and coundl have felt that this was time well spent; in other cases, councilmembers have refused to participate for one reason or another. Nevertheless, in every city in which he has. served, the process has been successful in opening the lines of communication and, in some cases, in averting serious potential problems. veryone wants to hear what kind of'job he or she is doing, espedally when the response comes from ~the boss." Local government man- agers are no exception and truly deserve to re- ceive regular feedback. Why, then, does gaining manager evaluations often feel like pulling teeth, and why are they usually instigated by the manager? Review Oriented In Santa Clarita, California (population 147,600; incorpo- rated in 1987), CaravaLho, the first permanently hired city manager, came on board in 1988. In the early 1980s, ployment agreements had been emerging in California, and Caravalho's amounted essentially ~v ,~ l~t~ of agrccmcnt. Over time, the agreement has expanded to become a more comprehensive employment document that now contains a paragraph on regularly reviewing the manager's performance. According to the agreement, the city manager is evalu- ated by the council on an annual basis, through a process of review that has proved to be worthwhile and productive. The evaluation process in Santa Clarita uses a third-party facilitator. This approach often a myriad of advan- tages for both the council and the man- ager. Here is a step-by-step outline of the city's proceas. Crud~l pll~Ses The first step is to obtain a mutually agreed-upon, third-party facilitator. The next involves the facilitator and the manager in outlining such items for in- clusion in the evaluation as current is- sues in the local government, the rela- tionship of the council and the manager, and the individual and group dynamics between the manager and the council. Following an interview with the manager, the facilitator interviews each councilmember privately. These inter- views normally take from half an hour to two hours, depending on the needs of individual councilmembers. During the interviews, the facilitator focuses on sev- eral key areas. These may include com- munication, relationships, work priori- ties, and general opinions. In Santa Clarita, they encompass: Key relationships between the man- ager and the council, city staff, the public, city committees and com- missions, and other governmental agencies. Opinions on the manager's responsi- bilities and abilities, along with the manager's personal style, strengths, and areas for improvement. · Topics relating to budgeting, public relations, program management, and employee relations. Councilmembers are asked to provide an overall rating of the manager on a scale of 1 to 10, and at this time there may be a discussion regarding compen- F requently, the performance evaluation process is viewed as a potential calamity that instills trepidation or stress in the parties involved. This need not be the case! sation. After the facilitator has com- pleted discussions with councilmembers; a dosed-session meeting takes place for approximately three hours with all coun- cilmembers present. The first hour of the meeting is devoted to the facilitator's addressing the counc~menbers and pro- viding the information they each have supplied in individual meetings. Infor- mation is given in the aggregate, and a summary of each discussion area is re- viewed by the group as a whole. Subsequently, each councilmember identifies an area on which he or she Mll provide feedback to the manager. At this point, the manager is invited to join the remainder of the closed session, and each councilmember presents informa- tion, which that is given from the group's perspective. This process involves a report pre- pared by the facilitator that covers (1) the goals and objectives of the manager, as outlined previously by the council; (2) the manager's accomplishments for the ),ear; (3) the individual comments of the councilmembers; (4) the overall rating; and (5) other notes that the facilitator may have gleaned from these discussions. good part of the time--perhaps up to an hour--listening to the feedback and tak- ing notes on each of the councilmem- bets' comments. The next part of the meeting gives the manager a chance to respond to any of the councilmembers' comments or questions. At this point, the council and man- ager discuss specific issues, including performance items and additional goals that may be desired by individual coun- cilmembers. This session is informal and free-flowing. At the end of the pro- tess, specific action statements are de- vdoped. (Then, within six months, a follow-up report describing progress on the action items ia provided to the coun- cil flora the manager.) The meeting concludes with cotm- cilmembe~ agreeing to an overall, sum- mary evaluation of the performance of the manager,' which is signed by the mayor and all cotmcilmembers. The fa- cilitator is requested to prepare a short paragraph summarizing the results of the evaluation. This summary, along with any salary increase proposal, is provided to the press and placed in the manager's personnel file. The director of human re- sources sometimes assists in'this process. Top 10 Benefits Here, then, are the authors' ideas on the top 10 benefits of an annual manager evaluation: 1. The annual evaluation process pro- vides a regular time for the manager and council to sit down as a group in closed session and talk about the working relationship between the council (board of directors) and the manager (CEO), providing feedback they may not give or receive on a day-to-day basis. 2. The annual evaluation allows each councilmember to explore whether his or her individual feelings are shared by the rest of the council or whether they are just the feelings of one individual member. It also al- lc;v: the ceunci! to ~o,,;~,,, its man- ager responsibly, with a well- thought-out strate~ for evaluation. 3. The facilitator is able to ask direct questions and listen to the coun- cilmembers' responses without be- coming personal or defensive. A real effort is made to bring to the surface and eliminate hidden agendas. This process allows for open and candid communi~ation by cotmcilmembers. 4. The annual process of evaluation of the manager--when done with hon- est intentions, forethought, and planning-Z-has the ability to head off potentially serious problems simply by making all of the parties involved aware of the issues. 5. The annual evaluation proves an ex- cellent opportunity to deal with cases in which there are sensitive personnel issues. The process gives the manager an opportunity to hear about and ad- dress a situation or to develop a pm- gram for making specific personnel changes and improvements. 6. Another bentqlt of the annual evalua- tion is recognition. Council meetings can carry he'aw/ agendas, and often there is not adequate time to talk about successes. During an evaluation, the council can spend time talking about accomplisl:hments and how the man- ager has been working, along with other staff, to achieve the objectives of the couno3 and.the community. 7. A significant outcome of the annual review is an action plan, which may cause the manager to shift priorities and resources to accomplish things that probably were not as clear as they should have been. The benefit is that the council is able to redirect ef- forts, and staff members are able to carry out those tasks that are viewed by the council as most important. 8. ^ third-party facilitator for the evalu- ation contributes to a better, more dearly defined, professional process that strengthens the council-manager relationship. (Based on Santa Clarita's experience, facilitator costs can nm from about $5,000 to $5,0000 9. In some sessions held in the public arena, councils are reluctant to bring up the point of a compensation in- crease. The dosed-session evalua- tion process offers an excellent op- portunity to bring up this question. 10. This process may give the manager a chance to offer feedback to the council from department heads and citizens concerning its performance. Frequently, the performance evalua- tion process is viewed as a potential calamity that instills trepidation or stress in the parties involved. This need not to be the case! Even in worst-case scenarios, with a divided or argumenta- five council (and most managers and governing bodies have been there), a wall-planned evaluation process that in- dudes a third-party facilitator can suc- ceed in mending fences and focusing positively on the future. Jo Anne Darcy is the mayor of Santa Clarita, California, and George Caravalho is city manager, Santa Clarit~ This procedure-" Manager Appraisals" was introduced by Dr. Mathis and is being used today by many City Councils 3435 Valle Verde Drive o Napa, CA 94558 Phone: 707/252-2151 Fax: 707/252-1349 w v,,~v.M~t!~isA ssoc i~tes, c e,.,~-~ 211 And our flag was still there... MATHIS & ASSOCIATES 3435 Valle Verde Drive · Napa, CA 94558 Phone: 707/252-2151 Fax: 707/252-1349 E-Mail mathisl~.napanet.net www. MathisAssociates.com Don't the Your oun The nature of the job for elected officials puts their local government business into the combined time squeeze of work, home life, family, and recreation. Unless the elected official enjoys "retirement," the juggling act for the cit- izen-turned-elected-offi- cial can be chaotic if the local government manager, staff, and citizens do not support the effort to govern. Managers can develop consis- tent and helpful strategies for support- ing their elected officials (referred to as the coun- cil in this article) and for dispelling fears that things may fall through the cracks or that council ~von't follow up. They need to remind staff that councilmem- their elected officials for granted and, as a result, council did not feel respected. We get busy with hectic schedules and crises, and there doesn't seem to be enough time in the day to get our own things taken care of. When everybody has his or her own important agenda to carry out, it be- comes easier to work with and see a councilmerhber as "just another city employee" who may become disregarded, or one we hope to avoid if possible. A councihnember might, after all, have yet another request, suggestion, question, or something that may take too much time, and maybe we can't really help. That could be even xvorse. Unhappil); there has been more turnover in 1o- bers are the elected officials of their communities and tend to get busy and distracted. Neglecting this point has gotten a lot of staff and local gov- ernment ~nanagers into trouble because the)' took calities' managers and assistant city managers as councils have become disillusioned with top management. Some of this could have heen avoided if councihnembers had felt and believed Ihcm, took notes, and followed through for them, then got back m then] so the), [<new they were being heard and responded BASIC GROUND RULES Honor confidentiality and Fair- ness. Treat cacln com]cilmenlber fairly and equally. (This is nmhing new, just sometiums overlooked.) Do not pla), COLInCJ['S view Of the prolessiona] manager--who can listen and assisl them in expressing their views better. Communication is not enough. Take uotes at every mecting. There are no informal meetings when coun- cilmembers or hoard members are present. Make sure tlnat you always have pen and paper with you ora des- ignated slafl member who under- stands tile menlbcrs' initiatives to take favorites with councihncmbers; this notes of all sugges ons, requests, and xvill spell disaster for the manager. Do ideas during a meeting not repeat confidential conversations Discuss and delegate certain Iopics with councihnembers Io others, tf and when necessary, have the local governments attorney or the man- ager's confidential assistanl present when issues need to be docu- mented. Councilmembers will un- derstand this Have your police chief present if a meeting iuvolvcs information regarding crime or fol- [ow-lhrough on crimes. Sometimes, councihncmbers will share gossip, frustrations, or whal grates on their minds. ¥lnere is no problem in just listening to what is being said and not feeling thc need ID answer or "do something.' In a few cases, however, cotm_cilmern- bets will share concerns that cannot bc kept in confidence, such as sus- peeled illegal activities, malfeasance in office, or dishonorable public prac- tices, and these concer~ls ii, us[ be acted on with either the council or the city or county attorney. Also, it is im- portant for the manager to give guide- lines ID councihnembers after each new election. Keep confidences. Confideuces often add up ID councilmcmbers' expressing ideas jnsl to []ear how lhey sonnd and to ruminate or practice on file manager befolc presentation in public. These confidences shmdd be kept and valued because Ihcy indicate lrusl in the man- agerk wisdom and abilily lo appropri- atOy an~!yze an idea Managers shmdd nol develop thc idea thai "if you IcH nit. il shouh[ be shared wilh all membms of dae coun cil to show fairness and ' " ; equity. Telling evmyune wouhl undercut ~hc No elected official wants to be out of the 'i0 p With no answers and no strategies, when something goes wrong or a crisis Occurs. lO slafl for more infol-mation after thc meeting. Staff may already have inlor- nlation available because a coun- cilmembcr has mentioned thc topic earlier, lhen, follow through in an- other COl]Versalion to make sure thai any rcquest is still valid. If it was.just an idea for the moment and [lot ii hcarffeh request, the mat!er may end there. 'Fake notes during ~elephone calls [',:qn councilmembcrs. Don't blow an elected official off as just another caller who likes tu hear himself or herself mil<. If councihnembcrs prefer to send c-mail ~nessagcs, make sure ti]ese messages are followed through on. Ioo. Delegate requests to Iht dc- partmeut []cads who can follow up. And ge~ hack m councihnemhers. Vv'hen giving information lc) a cihnemhcrs. Be fair and equal Elected officials need Io be oriented to ho~v a corns. An undcrstandmg of thc man ager's thought 'process will help COLIn cilors appreciate the managerk smcer- it); organization, and willingness to listen actively add then respond. COUNCIL'S DESIGNATED STAFF MEMBER Managers should be sawy enough to designate an intclligcnl staff member to the councilmembers, one who can serve then] in several ways. The slaff member should be able to: IJnderstand d~eir needs. Understand alt personalities. ~ Serve as a concierge. - Provide directions to the places they will travel. - Make hotel reservations (with confirmation numbers). - Reserve automobiles (gel coun- cihnembers' vehicle preferences). Make airline reservations. - Make conference reservations, and confirm them. - Keep au extra copy of all reser- vations, contrirmations, phone nmnbers, and addresses in case councilmembe/-s want Ibis in formation again. Notify mayor ana:l all councihnem- bers of public e~.'ents, meetings in Iowa, or lunclions requesting council's presenoe. Follow through for mayor and councilmembers on all city or count>, events. Follow through on council's e- ntails, and respond to them. Clue in the manager on what is going on. Do not leave tine man- ager out ol the loop on anything Copy the manager on councilmem- bets' reqeests and messages Io de- partment heads. Prepare a room for all meetings with an),' at'id a~l councilmembers in thc local go'~,ermnent buihling or specified place o[ meeting. - Have coffee on- desired beverages ready prior ti:, meetin~ time - Be prepared for councilmem- hers; think al'~cad for them. - Prepare councihnembers tor their meetings, and solicit ques- lions before n~eetings R. Iq ' \Vben bad things happen ox' a crisis occurs, make sure thc elected body is informed by you, the manager, and not by the press, other staff members. or callers. No elected official wanLs to be out of the loop, with no answers and no strategies, when something goes wrong or a crisis occurs. Keep yonr councilors informed up-front. Also, be prepared with strategies and options for councihnembers so they can be reasonably prepared to make a response to whatever might take place. TWO SYSTEMS THAT WORK Complaint Tracking System. One manager reports: "Our citizen complaint process is processed through Ihe manager's office. (In an attempt to lessen the negativity of the word "complaint," the term has been modified to "customer service request.") The idea is not only to have a centralized processing area but also to ensure that the man- agerg staff is aware of the issues presently of interest to the commu- nitS h also provides us with the opportunity, for example, to track trends of issues and problem areas." When asked how a complaint ready been or will bc taken lo reined), tfic concern. If no rcspousc is received by that date, a reminder is sent to the department. This is rarely necessary "If a service requesl comes through a councilmember on behalf of one of his or her constituents, we usc the same process, in Ibis case, of course, we would notify the councilmember of the resuhs as well." Calendar Reminders. The biggesl cmnplaints from staff usually involve manager's staff form a unique and eclectic partnership that is ............ I electorate. The manager must develop staff members to be able to meet the challenges. management system works, the man ager replied: "The staff processes thc : a councihnember forgetting or losing requests using a Microsoft Access pro- a reminder about a significant cmn- gram and records a service number, ~ raunity date or event. The biggest department(s) to whom the request is i need for a governing body might be a routed, service address, description, ' centralized calendar and special auto- name of person making the request, and Iris or her telephone number. "Generally speaking, we do not ac- cept anonymous comments. If the staff person believes the issue is cmn- pelling enough to investigate--for ex- ample, an allegation of a major heahh or safety issue--we wifi notify the ap- propriate department and ask thai il be checked out. spond to the request and report back to the manager's office of their find- ings within 10 days. Additionally; the department is required to notify thc been completed and if action has al- matic reminders, such as wake-up calls at hotels, signals of upcoming civic events, memos of appointments, and the like. A busy council will des- ignate highly sophisticated systems to complete Ibis task. Regular e-mail contacts or daffy cellphone reminders often work well. This activity should not be considered babysitting but a necessary part of tracking ha~inczz f~r c!cctcd afficials. PANDERING OR BABYSITTING VERSUS SUPPORT To a great exlent, if a councJJnaelnber believes that a certain level of support is important to him or her or to his or bet constituency, it doesn't maucr if staff members consider it pandering, babysilting, or anything dsc they might want to call it. Staff members must realize that they look m thc world through different-colored glasses than do elected officials. Managers are the protessiona[s who ensure Ihat things are done as ef- liciently and effectively as possible, whereas elected officials look at things from a political perspective and want to see results that will en- hance their political positions. It is imperative, however, that adminis- tralive staff recognize that coun- cilors have indeed been elected by the residents of the cotncnunity and are the ones that know the pulse of the constituents. So, from the management per- spective, as long as a councilment bet's request doesn't violate any local mles or regulations or Ihe ICMA Code of Ethics, the manager is going 1o make sure tl~e elected official is accommodated (even down to the question "Where are we going to dinner tonight, nov,, that we're at the league's annual conference?"). From a jaundiced perspective, managers are some- times indeed the "hired help." WHAT ARE THE SMALL IRRITANTS THAT COULD BECOME LARGER? Here are some personal statements that answer the question "Do small things matter?" "1 know a manager who was fired be- cause, ahhough he was great with the big-picture items, hc didn't get the potholes fixed that councilmembers had told him needed to be done" "Cotutcilmembers frequently pa}, a lot of attention to their pa), and benefits getting all they're due, staff is sure to hear about it." "Councilnrcmbers want Io be sure they're treated with the respect they think they're due because of the office Important Issues I. Get the facts straight, 2, Don't jump ahead of councilors. 3. Give them the public spotlight: 4. Prepare them for facing public issues. they hold. if they don't think staff re- spects them, things can get really tough." "An offhand remark at a public gath- ering that's perceived as being nega- tive toward a councilmember will invariably get back to that council- member and can easily come back to bite you." FOLLOWING THROUGH ENSURES YOUR CREDIBILITY When your councilmember has a re- quest, mandate, or suggestion, make sure it is followed through on immedi- ately, even before the job has been com- pleted. Many times, it will take several hours, days, or maybe weeks before the request can be completed. The coun- cihnember, however, should be notified as soon as the task is delegated, con- cerning the timeline, the work backlog, and the equipment needed. Councilmembers need'to know that their requests were taken seri- ously and that they were heard. See- mg that this is so will save a lot of h~stration and misconceptions down the road. SHOW UPI heard from an elected official is that the manager doesn't show up at pub- lic events. Managers need to make an effort I~ pick the~events that are most important to be seen (by council) and to attend them. For many events, des- ignate the assistant manager or deputy manager and, in some cases, a department head to attend. Managers need to be seen by the mayor and councilmembers as being participants in the communit)~ COUNCILMEMBERS SHOULD KNO~V THEY COUNT Councilmembers feel more comfort- able when they know they count as their localities' elected officials. They also need to know they count as peo- ple; they have feelihgs, and they know when they are being brushed off and disregarded. They are the bosses; they are elected to make changes and to make a difference, and staff members are hired to follow through for them. The council's "pet peeves" should not be revisited over and over again. A manager should remember what they are. The manager also should make sure that councilmembers know they have been heard, that action will be taken when needed, and that there will be follow through. Council and the manager's staff form a unique and eclectic partnership that is chosen by the electorate. The manager must develop staff members to be able to meet the challenges inher- ent in their jobs. The ideas identified in this article represent some of the most common issues and resolutions. You certainly don't have to drop the ball when it comes to your elected officials' needs. Bill Garrett is president, California City Management Foundation (CCMF), and city manager of El Cajon, California. Janice Schreuder is former deputy city manager of Pomona, California, and currently human California. Bill Mathis, Ph.D., is a CCMF board member and management psycholo- gisr~ Napa, California. ICMA.org In the course of solving problems, adding a key team, council or staff member, or learning how to work with each other better, your answer may lie in having Mathis & Associates establish a program in which your team can learn at 100% effectiveness! Mathis & Associates provides consultation in a vast array of the following matters: · Refreat lraci/itaUon - City Council - Management teams · Customer Service - * Department - * Council - * Staff · KeyExecutive Assessment Authority & responsibility City Manager County Manager Police / Fire Chief Deputy / Director. · City Councifs Guide to · Human Resources ~_ yaluab'ng your C~y Management Manager Studies of management - A progressive approach to the evaluation process · Transition Management Public entities Non-Profit Police · City Councils Guide to Eva/uaNng A #orney Services - Every City deserves the best legal services at the lowest cost! Compensation Classification Training needs assessment Performance evaluation systems Policy & Procedures manual Focused recruitment Employee/community surveys o Situational Leadership magbJsT~napane£net Training R. H~illiam Mathis, Ph.D. fl/,1UlJ$ & Associates 3435 Valle Verde Drive Fax 2~2- I ~.~ MATH[$ & ASSOC A7 ES 3435 Valle Verde Dr., Napa, CA 94558 Ph: 707-252-2151 Fax: 707-252-1349 Dr. Mathis E-M: mathisl@naAtanet, net Office: mathis@nal~mzet, net Since 1971 we have been helping organizations like yours make changes through strategic planning to achieve high performance, achieve superior levds of employee morale, and to move their organizations forward to the next level. You are known as having a good organization, run by good managers. We believe we have some tools, techniques and approaches that will make your organization and your directors even better. Dr. Bill Mathis is committed to help make your work more productive and even more fun and would be pleased to discuss with you, without charge, any of the following topics you might be interested in or feel your group could benefit from: · Conducting crucial conversations - advanced dialogue and communication skills · Manager coaching skills - turning good managers into greater managers · Teambuilding skiil~ ~ blending directors and staff into a cohesive successful group · Strategy and business pIanning- management approach to setting and evaluating goals · Conflict management - discovering how our personal style either helps or hurts us in getting what we want · Virtual organization assessment - how to do a speedy audit of your organization's strategy · Conducting the City Manager's, City Attorney's, or Board Executives' annual evaluation and setting goals and objectives for the following year Mathis & Associates has over thirty years of professional management experience in the public and private sectors and formal education and training in organizational development and change. We hope you will take advantage of a conversation with Dr. Bill Mathis. You may reach him at 707-252-2151. Please take a look at the following website: www. MathisAssociates.com ..... I -. ,~ to move ahead! RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR port DALE: May 18, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR CUP95-25, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY SAHGA GROUP, L.P. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIR Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for CUP95-25 were approved by the City Council on July 16, 2003, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $364,300.00 $182,150,00 Due to unfortunate delays, the developer, Sahga Group, L.P., is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments BASE UNE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENC_dNEER1NG DIVISION. N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP95-25 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 18, 2005, by Sahga Group, L.P., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said CUP95-25; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SbffReport DALE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2002- 00519, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY NORTH-BOUND ON RAMP, SUBMITTED BY FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA, LP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSlR Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2002-00519 were approved by the City Council on March 17, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $36,400.00 $18,200.00 Due to issues with the CaI-Trans on-ramp the improvements have not yet been completed. The developer, Fountainhead Delta, LP, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments Fountainhead Development April 19, 2005 Ms. Tasha Hunter Public Service Tech 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Improvement Agreement DRC2002-00519 NEC Foothill & 1-15 Dear Ms. Hunter: Fountainhead Delta, LP, developer of the subject property, hereby requests a one (1) year extension of the Improvement Agreement for DRC2002-00519. We have been working diligently with our contractor, Inland Empire Builders, and civil engineer, Saxon Engineering to resolve the issue with the Cal-Trans on-ramp. Unfortunately, due to Saxon Engineering's lack of prompt response, we have been unable to complete the improvements in the time permitted under the Improvement Agreement and request an extension to complete the improvements. We anticipate having the civil engineering required to complete the improvements completed shortly. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (949) 752-2515. Sincerely, FOUN. T, A1NHEAD DELTA, LP FC. rHa i~iot hp'gMee nat~ aLg~ General Partner 1400 Quail Street, Suite 135o Newport Beach, CA 92660 949/752-2515 * Fax 949/752-7442 BASE UNE RD. ,.,~ ~MILLER FO m BLVD. W RT. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIN~.m~I~0 DWISlON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00519 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 18, 2005, by Fountainhead Delta, LP, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway north-bound on ramp; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2002-00519; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RAN C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 16512, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 16512 were approved by the City Council on May 5, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $246,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $123,000.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,900.00 The size and scope of the project has prevented the completion of all the improvements within the one year stipulated. The developer, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments April 28, 2005 Mr. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 16512 Dear Mr. James; KB Home requests an extension of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 16512. The request is necessary in order to complete both in-tract and off site improvements. The size and scope of the project has prevented the completion of all the improvements within the one year stipulated in the Improvement Agreement. Thank you for your consideration in this matter, if you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 618-1449. Sincerely yours Senior Project Manager KB HOME INLAND VALLEY 801 CORPORATE CENTER DR. SUITE 201 POMONA,CA 91768 TEL 909 802 llO0 FAX 909 802 1111 KBHOME COM II TERRA I! VICINITY MAP hi. TS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION TITLE: EXHIBIT: ~q RESO .UT ON HO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16512 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 18, 2005, by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 16512; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G ^ ENGINEERING DE PARYblENT DA'IE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR DR00-60, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET BETWEEN LA GRANDE STREET AND LOMITA DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION Pt is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for DR00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between La Grande Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Northtown Housing Development Corporation BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Northtown Housing Development Corporation 10271 "B" Trademark St. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer #M105881 $16,880.00 WJO:tch Attachment 19lb FOOTHILL ( ROUTE 66 ) z ROAD ~I'R££T BOUI~"VARD City of Rancho Cucamonga ENGINEERING DIVISION Item: Staff Report Title: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: RANC H O ENGINEERING C U C A M O N GA DEPARTMENT Sta rt DA~: TO: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR DR00-67, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMII-rED BY IRONWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for DR00-67, located on the north side of 4th Street west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Ironwood Apartments, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSI.~ The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Ironwood Apartments, LLC 5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, Ca 92121 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #1845895A Respectfully submitted, $47,190.00 William J. ©'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment CITY OF RANOHO CUCAMONGA N n~, DR 00-~7 ENGINEERING DIVISION c H O CUCAMONGA ]~NGINEEI~ING Dg PAt~?t41~NT StaffRepor DATE: May 18, 2005 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCED FOR MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12659, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF HANLEY AVENUE (BLUEGRASS AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 12659, located south of Wilson Avenue, east of Hanley Avenue (Bluegrass Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Centex Homes 2280 Wardlow Circle, Ste. #150 Corona, Ca 91720 Release: Faithful Performance reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond: #5944050 $54,470.00 Respectfully submitted, William d. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment City ofRancho Cucamonga Eng~neenng Department Tract 12659 WILSON AVENUE NORTH R^ NC h 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCED FOR MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12659-2, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TM STREET (WILSON AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Pedormance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 12659-2, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIR The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Release; Centex Homes 2280 Wardlow Circle, Ste. #150 Corona, Ca 91720 Faithful Performance reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond: #111 27324181 $4,900.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department Tract 12659-7_. WILSON AVENUE .-'~--- 12659-3 NORTH RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1~ NGIN E El~l N G D E PAl~ TlVl E N T DALE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12659-3, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TM STREET (WILSON AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 12659-3, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue 24" ' and Street (W Ison Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Centex Homes 2280 Wardlow Circle, Ste. #150 Corona, Ca 91720 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond: #111 4162 4863-1 $127,580.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment City of Rancho Cucamonga Eng~neenng Department Tract 12659-3 I,/I LSON AVENUE I I I I -~. 12659-3 NORTH RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCED FOR MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12659-4, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TM STREET (WILSON AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 12659-4, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes BACKGROUND/ANALy$1R The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Centex Homes 2280 Wardlow Circle, Ste. #150 Corona, Ca 91720 Release: Faithful Performance reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond: #5927989 $83,200.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department Tract 12659-~- WILSON AVENUE 12659-3 NORTH RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT DAI~: TO: FROU: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16105, LOCATED BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES, (FORMERLY RANCHO CUCAMONGA LAND CO., LLC) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16105, located between East Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, south of Base Line Road, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, (formerly Rancho Cucamonga Land Co., LLC) BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes, (formerly Rancho Cucamonga Land Co., LLC) 3536 Concourse Street, Suite 100 Ontario, Ca 91764 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Respectfully submitted, William J 0 Nell City Engineer #BE 2634350-M $142,000.00 WJO:tch Attachment BASELINE ROA z PROJECT SITE ~_ II ~ OTHILL ///]~'ff,,~/ (R¥ 66) BOUL~D ~ FOOTHILL. ..,_ _ . ROU~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGI3~.~G DIVE. ON N RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINI~I~DING Dl~p^l~"g~l ENT Staff Report DALE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16193, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY EMPIRE HOMES II, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16193, located at the southeast corner of Hillside Road and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Empire Homes II, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIR The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Empire Homes II, LLC 20 Corporate Park, # 240 Irvine, Ca 92606 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Respectfully submitted, William d. O'Neii City Engineer #B3 4217699 $72,790.00 WJO:tch Attachment VICINITY MAP' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND RETAINED IN LIEU OF THE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16302, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SMOKESTONE STREET AND MULBERRY STREET, SUBMITTED BY APHRC23, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16302, located on the northeast corner of Smokestone Street and Mulberry Street, submitted by APHRC23, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER APHRC23, LLC 4959 Palo Verde, Suite B-110 Montclair, Ca 91763 Release: Faithful Performance in lieu of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond: #B36005276 $218,100.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment STAT[ HIGHWAY 30 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENC~,~NG DIVISION m~.,, T~T RANC H O CUCAMONGA E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DALE: May 18, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE I, II & III IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE I, II & III IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA, LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY, SUBMri-I'ED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC RECOMMENDATION: The required Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) improvements for Rancho Etiwanda (Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, II & II) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds and accept Maintenance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of Development Agreement No. 00-02 for Rancho Etiwanda, located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard north of the 210 Freeway, the applicant was required to complete landscape maintenance district improvements. The LMD improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds. Developer: Release: Accept: Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC Faithful Performance Bonds (Landscape Infrastructure) Phase I: #3SM 044 752 00 $1,022,500.00 Phase Ih #3SM 044 753 00 $1,715,300.00 Phase Il: # $ 399,300.00 Maintenance Bonds (Landscape Infrastructure) Phase h #SU6001717 $ 102,500.00 Phase Ih #SU6001712 $ 171,530.00 Phase Il: #SU6001750 $ 39,930.00 Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION LMD 10 ~ Creek Boulevard_ · Median, 210 Fwy to Wilsom · Both sides, Vintage to Wilson · West side north of Wilson Vintage Drive · North side with Paseo Banyan Street · Trail (T) on south side, Rochester to Bluegrass · North side, SCE to Rocking Horse Wilson Avenue · Median, Day Creek to Bluegrass · Trail (T) on south side, SCE to Bluegrass · North side, SCE to Day Creek Bluegrass Avenue · West side, School to Wilson Existing Interior Paseos (5) are Concrete (C) with no landscaping May 2005 NORTH ~' 1"= 1000' Vicinity Map LMD 10: Rancho Etiwanda Landscape Infrastructure RESOLUTION NO. ~5"' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA (LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE I, II & III) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public landscape maintenance district improvements for Rancho Etiwanda (Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, II & III) have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. 742 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(e)(2)(D) RECITALS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), adopted Ordinance No. 166 on December 23, 1981 approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on August 13, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 316A, approving and adopting Amendment No. 1 to the Redevelopment Plan (the redevelopment plan for the Project, as amended by Amendment No. 1, is referred to herein as the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, on November 17, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 537, establishing certain time limitations with respect to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 721, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6 (e)(2)(C) to extend by one year the limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness or receive property taxes from the Project; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has been designated as the official redevelopment agency in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to carry out the functions and requirements of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 33681.12, which was added to the Health and Safety Code by Senate Bill 1096, requires the Agency during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 fiscal years to make a payment for deposit in the San Bernardino County's Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund; and WHEREAS, with respect to redevelopment plans adopted on or before December 31, 1993 for which the time limit for the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan is more than 10 years but less than 20 years from the last day of the fiscal year in which an ERAF payment is made pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33681.12, Section 33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code was amended by Senate Bill 1096 to provide that when a redevelopment agency is required to make a payment pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33681.12, the legislative body may amend the redevelopment plan to extend by one year the time limit on the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 by adoption of an ordinance, without the necessity of compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 33354.6 or Article 12 (commencing with Health and Safety Code Section 33450) or any other provision of the California Redevelopment Law related to the amendment of redevelopment plans, including, but not limited to, the requirement to make the payment to affected taxing entities required by Health and Safety Code Section 33607.7 provided the City Council makes certain findings with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency will make the Fiscal Year 2004-05 ERAF payment to the Los Angeles County Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33681.12 on or before May 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council desire that the Redevelopment Plan be amended to extend by one year the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to the Health and Safety Code Section 33670 on account of the Agency's Fiscal Year 2004-05 ERAF payment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Findinqs. The City Council hereby finds and determines with respect to the Project as follows: (a) Funds used to make the Fiscal Year 2004-05 ERAF payment would otherwise have been used to pay the cost of projects and activities necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. (b) The Agency is in compliance with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2. (c) The Agency has adopted an implementation plan in accordance with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33490. (d) The Agency is in compliance with subdivisions (a) and (b) of Health and Safety Code Section 33413. (e) The Agency is not subject to sanctions pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33334.12 for failure to expend, encumber or disburse excess surplus. SECTION 2: Public Hearin,q. On May 4, 2005, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Effectiveness. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)(D), December 23, 2023 is hereby established as the date upon which the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan shall be deemed to be terminated. SECTION 4: Repayment of Indebtedness; Receipt of Tax Increment. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)(D), except as provided in Health and Safety Code subsections 33333.6(g) and (h), December 23, 2033 is hereby established as the latest date on which the Agency shall pay indebtedness related to its activities or receive property taxes from the Project pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670. SECTION 5: Full Force and Effect. Except as amended by this Ordinance, the RedeveJopment Plan is unchanged and is in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. SECTION 6: Severability. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance if such invalid or unconstitutional portion thereof had been deleted. SECTION 7: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and is hereby directed to publish or post this Ordinance in accordance with law. T H E C I r Y O F l~AN Ci~ 0 C UCA FI 0 N G^ Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION REVISING FEES IN THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, TO LEVELS MANDATED BY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MEASUREI, PASSED BY VOTERS ON NOVEMBER2,2004. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council pass Resolution No.O.~-/~,~, which will revise fees in the existing Transportation Fee Schedule, bringing the City into compliance with the San Bernardino County Measure I Ordinance. BACKGROUND: At the March 16, 2005 meeting of the City Council, staff presented information pertaining to the Measure I extension passed by voters in November 2004. The new measure requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development so as to ensure that all development pays its fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. Agencies that do not comply with the new Measure I Ordinance will risk the loss of Gas Tax funding, as well as Measure I funding for all projects within their jurisdictions that are included in SANBAG's Development Mitigation Nexus Study. Upon the conclusion of the presentation at the meeting March 16th, Council directed staff to prepare a new Transportation Fee schedule and resolution that will update the fees and bring the City into compliance with the new Measure I ordinance. Council also directed staff to place the item on the agenda of a future meeting where the passage of a resolution approving an updated fee schedule would be considered. This item appears before the Council at present, via this staff report. Page 2 A Resolution Approving the Passage of an Updated Transportation Fee Schedule Staff has completed an evaluation of the impacts to the City's existing Transportation Fee structure based upon a new comprehensive project list for the Transportation Fee Program. Information utilized in calculating the new fees include the developer fair share percentage for the three Rancho Cucamonga projects identified in the Nexus Study, updated costs for all proposed projects, deletes completed projects, and includes some additional projects. The updated schedule has 14 different land use classifications illustrated below: Project Type Existing Fee Proposed Fee % Increase $ Change Single-Family Dwelling Unit $1,710/unit $3,342/unit 95% $1,632/unit Multi-Family Dwelling Unit $1,026/unit $2,264/unit 121% $1,238/unit Commercial Shopping Center $2.565/sf $5.487/sf 114% $2.922/sf Apartment $2,195/unit New Category New Category Senior Housing (Attached) $732/bedroom New Category New Category Congregate Care Facility $342/bed $732/bed 114% $390/bed Industrial Park $1.026/sf $2.195/sf 114% $1.169/sf Warehouse $1.829/sf New Category New Category Office/Business Park $2.052/sf $4.390/sf 114% $2.338/sf Hotel/Motel $1,368/room $2,926/room 114% $1,558/room Self Storage $34/unit $73/unit 114% $39/unit Day Care $427/student $914/student 114% $487/student Convenience Store w/Gas $8,550/pump $18,290/pump 114% $9,740/pump Respectfully Submitted, Williflm J. O'Neil City Engineer transportation Type Single Famil? Multi-Family Apartment Senior Housing Corem Shopping Ctr Congregale Care Fac Industrial Park Existing Fee $1,71 O/unit $1.026 unit $2,565, sf $342/bed $1.026/sf Proposed Fee S3.342/unit 52.264 unit $2.195/unit S732 perb&qn S5.487/sf $732/bed 52.195/sf Type Commercial Existing Fee Proposed Fee Sx.565/-~f 5.614 'sf YVarehouse S 1.829/sf Ot'fice/Business Park S=.052 sf ?,4.390/sf Hotel/Motel $ 1,368/room S2_926 room Self Storage S34/unil S73/unit Da5, Care S427 student 5914/student COBX~ enlence Slole ' S8.550/pump $ l 8.290 pump w/Gas Pumps Rancho Cucamon~a Transportation Proiects RESOLUTION NO. ~""/~ ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO REVISE CITY-WIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in March, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Division is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate; and WHEREAS, the revised cost estimates and fee calculations were available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing, and WHEREAS, the 30-year extension of the Measure I half-cent transportation sales tax was approved by voters of San Bemardino County on November 2, 2004, and a provision of this ordinance requires that each local jurisdiction in San Bernardino County adopt a development mitigation program that will address regional transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has prepared a nexus study to determine new development's fair share contribution for the improvement of certain described regionally significant transportation projects, and local jurisdictions are responsible for the collection of fees for the described projects that are located within their jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find as follows: A. The purpose of this fee is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and B. The fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities are consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 2 D. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and E. That there is also a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and F. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Definitions: (a) "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. (b) "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. (c) "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU. 2. .Payment of fee. The Transportation Development Fee shall be paid upon issuance of any building permit. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 3. Fee Schedule: The amount of the Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $3,803 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 4. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. May 18, 2005 Page 3 Land Use Type EDU Residential- Single Family Detached Unit Residential- Multiple Family Attached Unit Apartment or Condominium- Attached Unit Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) Nursing/Congregate Care- per bed Commercial- per 1,000 square feet Office/Business Park- per 1,000 square feet Industrial- per 1,000 square feet Warehouse per 1,000 square feet Hotel/Motel- per room Day Care- per student Self Storage- per unit Service Station- per pump 1.0 EDU O.6 EDU 0.6 EDU 0.2 EDU 0.2 EDU 1.5 EDU 1.2 EDU 0.6 EDU 0.5 EDU 0.8 EDU 0.25 EDU 0.02 EDU 5.0 EDU 5. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 6. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 7. Fee Review: The Engineering Division shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and. the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which this fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 8. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days following passage by the City Council. 9. Judicial Action to Challen.qe this Resolution: Any judicial action proceeding to attack. Review, Set aside, void or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption, RAN CH O CUCAMONGA 1~ N G IN E r 1~ I N G D E PAI~ T ~ ~ N T StaffR rt DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopt a Resolution amending the existing electric rates, fees and charges pursuant to the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga established a municipal utility on August 31, 2001. The City has subsequently undertaken the actions necessary or desirable to obtain electric power from energy suppliers and construct the necessary facilities to distribute the acquired electric power to retail customers within the City. The City Council has determined that the adoption of Electric Service Rules and Regulations is necessary to further the orderly distribution of the electric power to the City's retail customers. On April 14, 2005, Southern California Edison (SCE) has part of their recent rate change modified their electric rates between -0.003874& 0.013700 cents per Kilowatt Hour. The change in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Electric Service Rates is to maintain parity with (SCE) Electric Service Rates. The City Council has subsequently adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges, may be amended from time to time by resolution. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TILE 3 OD THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MAY 18, 2005 PAGE 2 The City has provided the required notification to the public by publishing notice of this hearing on May 3, 2005, and May 18, 2005, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local newspaper of general circulation, and posting notice in at least two separate locations within the City. The proposed revised rates have been available for public review in the City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first published on May 3, 2005. The City Council has assured itself that the amended rates; fees and charges reflect the City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an enterprise and do not establish unfair, unreasonable or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable costs of doing business. Respectfully Submitted, ~ City Engineer W JO:MT Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals. (i) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution. (ii) City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and charges that reflect the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and distribution of electric power to retail customers and are recommending that the City Council adopt the recommended fees. These rates do not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the development, maintenance and expansion of a municipal electric distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff to regularly review the operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the reasonable costs to the City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges that are in excess of the reasonable costs of providing the electrical services as set forth hereinafter. (iii) The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and has determined that the adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable potential to a result in a significant impact upon the environment and is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the City Council has determined that the adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive environmental review under I I231-0001\807726vl.doc Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital projects for system expansion are included in the proposed action. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. correct. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are tree and Section 2. The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 shall be as set forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2005. Mayor I, Debra Adams, City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ day of ,2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga l1231-0001\807726vl.doc ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS 200S ANNEXATIONS LMD'S/SLD'S The Division of Engineering/Public Works ggfilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 9 i 729 Tel: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.274 i Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved William J. O'Ne TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................... 18 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ............... 19 A. GENERAL .................................................................. 19 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 19 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 20 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................ 21 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 22 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 22.30 acres of landscape area, 1.31 acres of turf, 41.88 acres of parks and 17.98 acres of community trails, which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 SITE LOCATIONS Site # A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 Descriptive Locations The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet The north and south side of Diamond Court fi.om Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet 5 A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80' south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 16,870 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald fi.om 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet 6 A-18 A-19 A-20 A-21 A-22 A-23 A-24 A-25 A-26 A-27 A-28 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. .Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 35,540 square feet The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet 7 A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet There was 1,512 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00 A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of East~vood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista Ground Cover area: 500 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire; the west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland; the parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian; the west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. 8 A-41 A-42 A-43 Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,656 square feet The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to 23 feet north of Sunflower; and from Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet 9 A-44, The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from North star to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet A-51 Amber The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of To 270 feet south of Amber. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and westside of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feetMamh 30, 2005 A-55 The northside of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The eastside of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet 10 A-56 A-57 A-58 A-59 A-60 A-61 A-62 A-63 A-64 A-65 A-66 The eastside of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthom. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet The eastside of Hermosa From 115 north of Coca To 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet The Westside of Haven fi.om 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 squar~ feet The eastside of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 feet south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet The West side of The north side of Carrafl from Archibald to London. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet The eastside of Archibald fi.om Can'afl to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet. The southside of Almond street fi.om Carriage to Almond Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet. The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson fi.om Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet. The eastside of Archibald fi.om LaGloria to 328 feet north of LaGloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 Square feet. The eastside of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 Square feet. A-67 The Southside of 19t~ from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 Square feet. 11 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 The median on Blue Gum fi:om Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet The north side of 19th from Highland to Palm; the west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring; the east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 22,550 square feet The paseo from Sutter Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracina. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet The south side of Banyan fi:om Cabemet to 414 feet east of Cabemet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet The east side of Haven fi:om Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan; the north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet The south side of Banyan fi:om Muscat to Cabemet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito; the parkways on the east and west side of San Benito fi:om 19th to San Mateo; the east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east fi:om Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet 12 B-14 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21 B-22 north 517 Court. 562 B-23 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet The paseo from Yuba Ct. to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to feet north of Marbella. The tuff in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra The parkway on the north side Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The northside of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet. Turf Area: 6,390 square feet. The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope On the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet. There was 11,844 square feet of ground cover deleted from this site 7-1-00. 13 Bo24 The south side of Highland i~om 327 feet west Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet. B-25 B-26 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet. The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 Square feet 14 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-Il C-12 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa; the east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Tuff area: 9,423 square feet The entry monument on the north east and northwest comers of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,546 square feet The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. .Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tm/on to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet 15 C-13 C-14 C-15 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet The eastside of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet The north side of San Bemardino from Summerlin to 225' west of Summerin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet 16 D-1 D-2 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews 17 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Facilities Operations & Maintenance Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Equipment Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services - Trees Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. Contract Services - Facilities Subtotal Operations Capital Expenditures Outlay/Equipment Subtotal Capital Expenditures $90,550.00 $35,030.00 $47,520.00 $64,520.00 $16,900.00 $3,000.00 $1,000.00 $4,800.00 $154,000.00 $4,000.00 $47,250.00 $53,870.00 $448,550.00 $228,760.00 $3,150.00 $4,500.00 $19,000.00 $16,000.00 $173,100.00 $1,053,300.00 $16,000.00 Capital ProJect $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $136,480.00 Total LMD #t Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $1,418,880.00 $295,347.25 $1,123,532.75 ]8 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Non-Residential Improved EDU Value Multiplier 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) remain at $92.21 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 8115 1.0 8115 $92.21 $748,284.15 Multi-Family Pamel 8135 0.5 4067.5 $92.21 $375,064.18 Comm/Ind Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 Total $1,123,532.75 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 20 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3~3/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Landscape Maintenance District 19th S1 Base Line Rd Rd Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd ~rrow Rt 8th St P ~' 6th Legend ~ City Limits 4th St · = ~ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 o~ uJ~ ~ Miles' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAiNTENA2OCE DIgTRICT NO. ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISIRICT NOS. ! AND 2 0,182 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVI0I~GA COUNTY OF SAN BEI'~J'VAI;tl)INO STATE OF C_ALIFORNIA PARCEL I~AP 1603~ N 8948'28" 1~t93, EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 2 LOOP 659.g8' LOOP __ _ 6 LOOP AVENUE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTII LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT.NOS. I AND 2 I I STK-EET LI~I-/T~ 5~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII EXHIB{T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 BANYAN 0 STREET EGEND 2- ~-oo L STR~e~ LI~H/5 51- 3T~EET ~E~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 1~,5~5 NORTII~ AV.E. EXHIB{T "A"- ,~, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BEIr~NARDINO NORTII EXHIBIT "A' · ASSESSMEI',{T DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIqTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENPaNCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 TRACT 16430 LMD AREA--xxxxx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTII b~SSESSIYIEi~[T DIAGRA~ LANDSCAPE MAIN-~NANCE DISTRICT NO . STP~ET LIGHTfNG MAINTENANCE DIST~CT NOS. CIVIC CENTEF CtTM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH EXHIBIT "A'" - ~ '~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTEN~,NCE DISTRICT NO. 3B A. HD I · STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 III 6TH ST. PROJECT LOCATION ":Z I ., I 4TH ST. ,) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF C_A [.IFCU'~Nr~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ['rEM: ~.C 2 0O ~. - o0~ q£ TITLE: VICINITY NAP EXHIBIT: EXHIBIT ~A- ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ". ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · LANoSC^P~ ~n, rr~a~cs O~S-nUCT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~,,r.~, .r~' nl~ C. ALIFORNIA .o.-.,/ qb Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Apl ~illiam J. O'Neil, Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ..........................18 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ............... 19 A. GENERAL .................................................................. 19 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 19 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 20 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................ 21 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 22 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 SITE LOCATIONS Site # 2-1 VW-1 VW-2 VW-3 Descriptive Locations Arbor Lane from Church to Cul-de-sac at the roundabout. The frontage for the park not part of the site. Ground Cover area: 59,132 square feet Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet The north side of Base Line, 300 feet east and west of Swanson; the east and west sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province; the pasco from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore; the pasco from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore; the pasco from Saratoga to Etiwanda; the south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis; the north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Tuff area: 2,637 square feet 5 VW-4 VW-5 VW-6 VW-7 VW-8 VW-9 VW-10 VW-11 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet Tuff area: 10,242 square feet The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet The paseo nmning north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet The pasco running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9,188 square feet Turf area: 3,851 square feet The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct., to Dahlia Ct.; and the east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,398 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; the Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.; and the parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Tuff area: 24,187 square feet 6 VW-12 VW-13 VW-14 VW-15 VW-16 VW-17 The Victoria Park Lane median fi:om the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop west to the tract wall; the parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop, west to the tract wall; the parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane and; the parkway on the south side of Silverberry fi:om the wall to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet Tuff area: 38,842 square feet The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane fi:om the west tract wall to South Victoria Windrows Loop; and the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Tuff area: 16,476 square feet The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane; the parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to the wall; the parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star; and the parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way fi:om Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way and following that curb line to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry; the parkway on the north side of Silverberry fi:om North Victoria Windrows Loop to the tract wall; the pasco from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium; and the pasco fi:om North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Tuff area: 12,207 square feet The south side of Highland fi:om 455 feet east Day Creek to 534 feet west of Locust. The east and west side of Locust fi'om Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct.; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop fi:om Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Tuff area: 23,922 square feet This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. 7 VW-18 VW~19 VW-20 VW-21 VW-22 VW-23 VW-24 VW-25 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland, the Polka Palace to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose; the east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland; the south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda; and the horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum; the pasco from Tipu east to the open field; and the parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct., to the trail south of Kalmia St.; the trail and pasco from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kaimia St., to Etiwanda Ave., and north to the Fire Station; and the south side of Basil St., from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina Pl. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the north east comer of Windrows Park and from that comer to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop; the parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur; and the parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct., to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square l%et Turf area: 3,425 square feet The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Turf area: 4,730 square feet The north side of Baseline from from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet 8 VW-26 VW-27 The Paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area 7,021 square feet The southside of Baseline fxom 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. Baseline median fxom Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area 18,816 square feet This site had 2667feet of ground cover added from median 6-8-2005. 9 VG-1 VG-2 VG-3 VG-4 VG-5 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail; from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont; the turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont; the ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane, west of Milliken, from Fairmont to Milliken; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont; the Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane, south of the horse trail, from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet Turf area: 73,608 square feet The turf and ground cover, north of the sidewalk, on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct., and continuing on that curb line to York Pl.; and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong Pl., and continuing on that curb line to York Pl.; the ground cover on the west side of York Pl., from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York Pl.; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong Pl.; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola Pl. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester, including the pasco to Baylor; the ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct.; the turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet The pasco from Biola at Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet 10 VG-6 VG-7 VG-8 VG-9 VG-10 VG-11 The paseo beginning at the northeast comer of Victoria Groves park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet The pasco that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Dounelly to Pacific and the pasco from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane fi.om Milliken to Fairmont; the ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont fi.om 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way; the ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont; the turf on the south side of Kenyon fi.om Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Baltimore Court; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Drive from Fairmont to Vanderbilt; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown; the pasco from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the tuff on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken; the ground cover on the west side of Milliken fi.om Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane; the tuff and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany; the pasco from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Milliken from Baseline to the abandoned railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet This site was reduced on 4-1-2002 by 25, 718 sq. ft. of turf and 3, 037 sq. fi. of ground cover This site was added to on 10-2-2003. 11 VG-12 VG-13 VG-14 VG-15 VG-16 VG-17 VG-18 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmom from the southeast comer of Milliken and Fairmont along that curb line to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest comer of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along that curb line to Milliken; the tuffon the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Verona; from Verona to Napoli and Genova and to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Tuff area: 16,344 square feet Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following that curb line to Kenyon; the north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Tuff area: 62,999 square feet The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Railroad tracks to Base Line; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East; the Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East; the turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road; the turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Tuff area: 57,306 square feet The paseo from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Tuffarea: 11,529 square feet The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Tuff area: 40,291 square feet The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet 12 VG-19 VG-20 VG-21 VG-22 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast comer at Milliken heading east to Fairmont; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast comer of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandio Ct.; the Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet The ground cover on the east side of Parma; the ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln., from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane fi.om Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon; the turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad; the pasco from Kenyon to Rapallo; the pasco from Kenyon to Bari; the Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct. to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester; the Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct., to Rochester Ave.; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane (north of sidewalk) from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet 13 VG-23 VG-24 VG-25 VG-26 VG-27 VG-28 VG-29 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi; the ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano; the tuff and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west side of Rancho Cucamonga High School; the ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara; the ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi, from Kenyon to Brindisi; the turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane; the ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The pasco from southwest comer of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. The pasco from south west comer of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to W0odmff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet The pasco west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland; the turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest comer of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. .Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet The pasco from Brindisi Ct., to Messina; the turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct., to the end of the cul-de-sac; the tuff and ground cover on the west side of Messina fi.om the pasco to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland; the parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Reduced 1,670 square feet of G.C. on 7-1-00 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet The westside of Milliken fi.om Highland Kenyon. The Northside of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the eastside of Fairmont, east of sidewalk, from Kenyon to Highland. The southside of 210 freeway fi.om Kenyon to Milliken from the asphalt to the wall. Ground Cover area: 69,788 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Reduced 18,940 of turf on 7-1-00. 14 VG-30 The southside of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The southside of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet VG-31 The eastside of Brienza from Larino to Lefini.The westside of Tindari from Letini to Lafino. The Greenbelt on the southside of Marconi from Tfivento to Comisco. The Eastside of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet VG-33 The paseo from the Sapri to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-34 The paseo from Bronte to Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet VG-35 south Channel. The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Tuff area: 11,150 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Annadore. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet VG-38 The eastside of Milliken from 106' feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north & south of Spring Mist Drive From Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet 15 VG-39 VG-40 VG-41 VG-42 VG-43 VG-44 VG-45 VG-46 VG-47 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon pasco to 132' east of Milliken. The Kenyon Pasco outlet from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The Pasco from Victoria Park Lane to southwest comer of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland pasco to Highland pasco. The east side of Highland pasco from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland pasco to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet The Westside of Rochester from 294 feet South of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark From Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet The southside of Highland fi'om 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 18,464 square feet The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington Place from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Drive. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet The westside of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet The Baseline Median from 657 feet east of Virginia Drive to Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The outlet at Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet The north side of Baseline fi'om 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet. This site had an addition 6-8-2004 6,272 square feet of ground cover for median. 16 VG-48 The East side of Day Creek Blvd. And median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf Area: 3,234 square feet VG-49 VG-50 VG-51 VG-52 VG-53 VG-54 VG-55 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 5.1,459 square feet Turf Area: 3,930 square feet The West of San Carmela from 389 feet north of of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Dumess. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Paseo south of Saxon to Railroad right away. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet The southside of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf Area: 11,070 square feet The eastside of Rochester from Shenandoah to the railroad right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 6,684 square feet Paseo north of Westhaven to the railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. 17 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Overtime Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Facilities Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Equipment Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance CVWD Manditop/Annual Backfiow Cert. Contract Services - Facilities Subtotal Operations Capital Expenditures Outlay/Building Improvements Outlay/Equipment Subtotal Capital Expenditures $598,170.00 $1,000.00 $110,240.00 $303,020.00 $67,150.00 $19,860.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $750.00 $365,000.00 $1,790.00 $75,000.00 $1,127,310.00 $99,800.00 $66,680.00 $3,500.00 $22,000.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 $1,012,430.00 $1,859,840.00 $8,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $205,850.00 Total LMD #2 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $3,086,120.00 $475,951.88 $2,610,168.12 18 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Non-Residential Improved Vacant Multi-Family Single Family Residential 2.00 Acres 0.25 Acres 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $422.00 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Unit Type Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5678 1.00 5678 $422.00 $2,396,116.00 Multi-Family Parcel 310 1.00 310 $422.00 $130,820.00 Comm/Ind Acre 56.37 2.00 112.74 $422.00 $47,576.28 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84 Total $2,610,168.12 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 2O Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 PROJECT UNITS TR 16370 82 SF TR 16612 186 MF TR 16374 25 SF TR 16301 53 SF TR 16445 17 SF ANNEX DATE 2/18/2004 3/17/2004 4/7/2004 12/15/2004 12/15/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Hillside R Banyan S~ Landscape Maintenance District 2 · Wilson Av Foothill Blvd ~rrow Rt Rd 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles , ! ,~ ~s~\ ~'-'-'~. ~ ! I I X',:: _ Base Line Rd~ i othill Blvd ~ 8th St ............. , ,.. '~'~~ 4th St~ [I 14thSt Legend ~'%~.~ City Limits ~1~ LMD 2 TRACT 16371 ~5 LOT ~ LOT A LOT 1 6615 LONG ME~DOW TRACT 16373 TRACT 16615 VICTORIA ARBORS AT VICTORIA ARBOR8 ~T (D.R. := _-=- J~ NO. 15948 TRA~ NO. 15947 I/~'~ STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS Z z 0 0 Z TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 VICTORIA ARBORS Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2004/2005, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. · , %,~5~ Approved by'~~' ,,~- TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL ..................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS .............................................................. 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3^ and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section '1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (LMD #3A) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A SITE LOCATIONS Site# Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hysop from 7th street to the south end of the cul- de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #3A are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation System repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3A are as follows: Operations Operations Maintenance and Operations Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Subtotal Operations $440.00 $630.00 $220.00 $2,330.00 $3,620.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD #3a Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $300.00 $3,920.00 $610.08 $3,309.92 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Industrial 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $413.74 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate Per Physical Unit Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue Industrial Pamel 8 1.0 8 $413.74 $3,309.92 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roil, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A No Annexations Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: I Hillside Rdi Banyan 19th , Base Line Rd ! Foothill Bhtd Arrow Rt 8th St O · 6th E ~ o > ! ! ! l ! ! I Landscape Maintenance District SA , > >! ;-.- ! i ~ <" t.-.: ! i~ ! ! ! ~. I ! m I I Wilson Av Foothill Blvd ~,rrow Rt i ! ! Legend ~"%~,~ City Limits ~ LMD 3A ILl 0.250.5 I 1.5 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. ~/William J.-O'Neil~ity Engine( [! TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: ............................................. 3 SECTION 2 -ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES: ....................................... SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT: ..................... 2 A. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................... 2 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 2 C. ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS: ................................................................. : ..................... 4 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS: ................................................................. 5 III Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-B LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B SITE LOCATIONS J-2 J-3 J-4 J-5 J-6 J-7 Site # Descriptive Locations The monument at the northeast comer of Haven and 4th Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Turf area: 6,068 square feet The 6t~ street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Tuff area 9,060 square feet The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet The 6th Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 J-9 J-lO J-11 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4~897 square feet The 6th street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet The 6th Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 J-13 J-14 SCHEDULE V-B LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B SITE LOCATIONS The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet. 4 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #3B are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3B are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Overtime Salades Part-time Salades Fringe Bener~s Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Facilities Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Equipment Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Landscape Maintenance - Metrolink Facilities Tree Maintenance CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. Subtotal Operations Capital Expenditures Outlay/Equipment Subtotal Capital Expenditures $158,620.00 $2,500.00 $24,250.00 $79,900.00 $52,550.00 $13,740.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $70,000.00 $3,360.00 $36,760.00 $309,610.00 $38,850.00 $127,000.00 $39,350.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $265,270.00 $709,220.00 $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD #3b Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year Distdct Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $63,820.00 $1,038,310.00 $152,319.83 $885,990.17 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment:. A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDLI's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial / Industrial 1.00 Acre It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $352.80 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2511.31 1.0 2511.31 $352.80 $885,990.17 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 PM 16365 11.84 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00606 19.55 AC 3~3/2004 PM 16123 2 AC 3/3~2004 PM 16124 0.99 AC 3/3~2004 PM 16125 .87 AC 3~3/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2003-00869 16.88 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2002-00006 2.3 AC 5/5/2004 DRC 2003-00302 1.42 AC 5/19/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 DRC 2003-00732 18.10 AC 6/16/2004 4 Section $ - Assessment Diagrams: ! ! ! I i Landscape Maintenance District 3B I ~ <1 8! Base Line Rd Foothill Bk, d Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt ~row Rt 4th St Legend ~ City Limits ~1~ LMD 3B 0 0.25 0.5 I 1.5 ~ Miles Mixed Use Winery &6/Acre 19.7 ACres 9.6 Acre~ S~flgle Fam~ .'4-10t Acre · MiX~4 Use thitl Boulevard Th area is comprised of approximately: OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: NORTH , . EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . LANDSCAPE MA .IN'I'ENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIST~CT NOS. i AND 6 APIq, ZO~-Z ~ol- 19 LF---~E'N~ · ' ~ ST~E£T' L~GMT · - ' [6,00OL HpSV 8 STI~F~I~'T TI~E~ BLED, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTi~ DRCZ003-00~EO EXHIBIT"A" · ASs~ss~.m' n~a~dv~ LAlqDs~pE MAIlJ~ANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B BLDG. A LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA HORTil DRC~003-008~6 EXHIBIT "A~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAI?E MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND ~ I I' SAN MARINC3. PARCEL MAP I~,1 I$ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,~TATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTil ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LiGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTEICT NOS. I.AND 6 · ' ".. L C SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE ~ L~--RCZO0 I~ 005'7~.. ' '- POR IV 1/:2, HE 1/4 .AlE 1/4 SEc 10, T15 FITW SBIPI PER MAp OF C/JCAA4ONGA LAAIDS 185' I I 500' J15'. LtG'HT' I .50' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIF~o~ A NORTH ASSESSMENT DIACRAM LANDSCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT lqO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND ~ ~J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII VICINITY MAP ,S' CITY HALL' CITY OF R~,NCHO CUCAMONGA ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO , STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i. CIVIC CENTER cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r~oR'r. ~/ CITY OF R-ANcHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO · ASSESSMEt~IT DIAGRAIV[ LANDsCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTil FOOTHILL N 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PROPERTY OF .~ANCHO CUCAMONGA N DIVISION N.T.S. DRC20O2-00006 City of Rancho CucamonRa EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 --ELM'. PAROEL:5. (,, ar.I T .51.~. . 'p~ ,t,f.. -' 3TREETLIGH"C, -' 5800 LLI/'"IEN H?sV 3-STREET 'i-RE£5 ADDED CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERHARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NORTH- D~C~O0t EXHIBIT "A" - ~ ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE iVIAINTEN~NCE DISTRICT NO. 3B A.N,D I ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. l AND 6 ~ 6TH ST. LOCATION 4TH ST. Ill Z "Z .{ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO i LO'~RON MAP FOOTHILl. Subject __VI C~'OII. I A LEGEND Subject Site - Propoeed Shopping Canter Major St,re,ts Cily Boundary · ' · EXHIBIT ' ASsESSMEIVF DIACRANI LANDSCAPE MAINT~ANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~t'r~, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA D~d~g:~3-ff_a~/oq ~ ~ EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSIVIENT DIA. GRAJVI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING Iv[A~CE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 1 ./'2, SEC..- 14, , LOT I 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIST~CT NO. 3B STP,.EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICr NOS. I AND COURT L£CEND ~ ST,~£ET LIGHT 3 "- N~_W ST'P, EgT IG, O00 LUMEN HPSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CAL. IF_ORNIA NORTII EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAFN'I'~~ANcE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. LF_6F_.ND ~ ST,'~EETLiGHT I~,OOO LU,~EN ~..-. N~.W STI~.E.~T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND "~' ~'E~F-N~TREE5 ON H£fi't'lO5A ' o ..STRF-.E.T L { £'d-IT$ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII A~ENUE VICTORIA pARK CAN[ ROAD PROJEC'[ SITE FOO~IlU- VICTOR/A BOULEVARD VICINITY MAP cITY OF RANCHO CUcAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: _ TITLE: EXHIBIT:_ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE I'vLA.~CE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIOHTINO MAII',FFENAIVCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 'r),~ ~f EXHIBIT · ASSESSMENT DIAGRAlVl LANDSCAPE IvlAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ARROW ROUTE G~7.1 9' ~(~'l " 293.3 ~;30.20' LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .~TATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTil ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 STREET '$~£ET T~EES ' · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A:3 HOR, Til P.H~. I&OlO PARCEL MAP NO 1 003':7 · . . ' . '.'" ' ' m~ 'rm. cm~ OF .a~a:~o'Cu~.~,,~.a. ' -.' '. ;':. ' ...' ,~_ ' ' ' BEI~ A R~ V~SI~ ~ PA~ I0 ~ PAR~ ~ ~. ~.A5 P~ ~ ' ' · . r. , - '. .. . ' ~" '~ '",.".'. ~': ~ ." .' L'"....~ '. .' ','~ ~'" ~ ~ :.~"' · - .I ' :.. ;"a.C;E ~l~." . '~, ~7- "' ~i~'K. V~.RIP~ .R:C.E.."~7~ : ~ -. ..'" · ..' .::.~'.' :.~.' . - ,, _. ... . ... .. ........... Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March., 2005. Approved b y :/~/~i/[[a m~j .~O~., h/,, e.~i i C~~',-/> TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ........................... 14 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................ 12 A. GENERAL ................................................................... 12 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 12 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 13 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 14 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 15 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective pamels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No, 4 (LMD g4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to be associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park, West Greenway. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE V-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 SITE LOCATIONS Site # TV-1 Descriptive Location The monument on the southwest comer of Haven and Base Line; the Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel; and the south side of Base Line from Haven to Deer Creek Chaimel less the fi'ontage of the condominium complex. Ground Cover area: 18,091 square feet Tuff area: 21,799 square feet Base Line median from Spruce to Deer Creek Channel; the south side of Base Line from Deer Creek Channel to Spruce; the west side of Spruce from Base Line to Terra Vista Parkway; the north side of Spyglass from Spruce to Roxbury. Ground Cover area: 15,072 square feet Turf area: 18,858 square feet The Base Line median east of Spruce. Ground Cover area: 12,707 square feet Turf area: 18,820 square feet 5 TV-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf area: 12,659 square feet The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median fi'om Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet The nor'ch side of Church fi.om the Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway; the west side of Terra Vista Parkway fi.om Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet 6 Site # Descriptive Locations TV-10 TV-11 TV-12 TV-13 TV-14 TV-15 TV-16 TV-17 The southeast comer of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Term Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest comer of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Turf area: 2,306 square feet The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Elm. Ground Cover area: 3,749 square feet The east side of Valencia bom Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Tuff area: 18,634 square feet The pasco at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Tuffarea: 2,091 square feet The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View fi:om Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the pasco from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Tuffarea: 3,355 square feet The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belevedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the pasco south of Mountain View between Belevedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Tuff area: 8,430 square feet The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biardtz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Tuff area: 4,738 square feet The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast comer of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Tuff area: 20,884 square feet The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet 7 Site # Descriptive Locations TV-18 TV-19 TV-20 TV-21 TV-22 TV-23 TV-24 TV-25 TV-26 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway; the south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor; Terra Vista Parkway fi.om Mountain View to East G-reenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet .Turf area: 5,944 square feet The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View; the north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View; the west side of Mounta'm View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet The Church median fi.om Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet The Milliken median fi.om Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the northside of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo fi.om Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet 8 TV-27 TV-28 TV-29 TV-30 TV-31 TV-32 TV-33 TV-34 TV-35 TV-36 TV-37 TV-38 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and fi:om Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet The pasco at 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet The East Greenway Corridor fi:om Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 51,478 square feet The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet The paseo from Elm tl West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet The Greenwich paseo fi:om Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet The south side of Mountain View fi:om 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Tuff area: 1,853 square feet The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School fi:om Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 The north side Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet The north side of Meyers fi:om Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Tuff area: 5,300 square feet The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet 9 TV-39 TV-40 TV-41 TV-42 TV-43 TV-44 TV-45 TV-46 TV-47 The north side of Mountain View from 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The eastside of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16~751 square feet The southside of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover. area: 11,630 square feet. The paseo from south of Terra Vista parkway to Mountain View which is east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet The north side of Mountain View fi.om Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Church median and parkway fi.om Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet The southside of Church fi.om Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet The westside of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 20,693 square feet The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet The eastside of Terra Vista Parkway fi.om Church to Brandywine. The paseo fi.om Brandwine to Bunker Hill Drive. The eastside of Radcliff from Bunker to Malada. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet 10 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #4 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Overtime Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Facilities Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Equipment Maintenance Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities E~ectric Utilities Contract Services Parkway & Median Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. Contract Services - Facilities Subtotal Operations Capital Expenditures Outlay/Building Improvements Outlay/Equipment Subtotal Capital Expenditures $653,440.00 $1,000.00 $29,540.00 $322,850.00 $59,270.00 $14,320.00 $6,000.00 $3,750.00 $1,000.00 $180,000.00 $2,940.00 $26,680.00 $380,860.00 $86,750.00 $14,750.00 $1,700.00 $16,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,006,830.00 $794,020.00 $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD ~ Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $132,330.00 $1,933,180.00 $377,995.28 $1,555,184.72 11 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Multi-family 1.00 Unit Single Family 1.00 Parcel Commercial / Industrial 1.00 Acre Senior Housing 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at same rate for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Physical Unit Physical Assessment Assessment Rate Per Land Use Type Units Unit Units Assessment Unit Single Family Pamel 2653 I 2653 $252.50 Multi-Family Unit 3448 1 3448 $222.00 Senior Housing Unit 216 1 216 $148.36 Commemial Acre 229.25 1 229.25 $382.99 Total Revenue $669,882.50 $765,456.00 $32,045.76 $87,800.46 $1,555,184.72 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 13 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16512 168 MF 5/5/2004 14 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Hillside R~ ! Landscape Maintenance District 4 I Base Line Rd 9. Foothill Blvd Rd ~.rrow Rt i ! Legend ~'%~,~, City Limits ~1~ LMD 4 UJ ith St ~= .~ 0 0.25 0.5 1 o 1.5 EXHIBIT "A" - Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIST'/CT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTPaCT NOS. I AND 4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by: f//~t~A/ ~4~ ../William J. O'Neil, ~tyVE'ng]neer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B, ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................... 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section I - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped tot lot, located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the tot lot such that any benefit derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of this, assessment required for this district is charged to those specific parcels. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 SITE LOCATIONS Site # Descriptive Location The tot lot on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet LMD-5 TOTAL GROUND COVER: LMD-5 TOTAL TURF: 1,506 square feet 1,070 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landsc,3, pe maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Facilities Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Facilities Landscape Maintenance Subtotal Operations $300.00 $500.00 $70.00 $540.00 $280.00 $],000.00 $1,890.00 $4,580.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $600.00 Total LMD #5 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $5,180.00 $195.24 $4,984.76 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent 'Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family EDU Value Multiplier 1.00 Parcel It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $113.29 for the FY 200512006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Land Use Single Family # of Rate per Physical Unit #of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Pamel 44 1 44 $113.29 $4,984.76 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bemardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 No Annexations Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: r-J ! ! ! ! ! ! Hillaide P,~li Banyan il. ! ! I ! Landscape Maintenance District 5 i = I : ! ! ! 19th: ! Foothill Blvd Line Rd :oothill Blvd Arrow Rt i i Legend ~'%_~CityLimits LMD 5 .c ~ 0 0.250. 1 1.5 ;~ ~] u J== ~ Miles Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. ~ ~/'V~iliam ~'. O'~leil,~t~ I~r~girlt 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 9 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................ 10 A. GENERAL ................................................................... 10 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .................................... 10 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 11 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 12 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 13 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto.. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, and community trails.. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE III-A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 SITE LOCATIONS .Site # Descriptive Locations CC-1 The Southside of Banyan fxom 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The Westside of Milliken & Median from Banyan to 292 south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Tuff area: 17,945 square feet This site was reduced March 13, 2003 because of freeway right-a-way 15,176 Ground Cover and 4,077 square feet Tuff. CC-2 This site was deleted 7-1-00 and was combined with CC-1. Both sites had 7784 square feet of ground cover deleted and 4077 of tuff deleted. CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning from Morning Place to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Tuffarea: 124 square feet CC-4 The west side of Morning Pl., from Banyan to Starview Pl.; the north side of Star View Pl., from Morning Pl., to Star View CT. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Tuff area: 5,513 square feet 5 CC-5 CC-6 CC-7 CC-8 CC-9 CC-10 CC-II CC-12 CC-13 Silver Sun pasco from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage to Vintage. The Netherlands View Loop pasco from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Tuff area: 676 square feet The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer CT. to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Tuff area: 6,318 square feet The pasco from Hillview Loop to Vintage Drive. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Turf area: 22,752 square feet The south side of Vintage from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass CT. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Tuff area: 4,954 square feet The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls CT. to Vintage. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from the paseo to Rochester. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy CT. from Banyan to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Woodland CT. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet The separation pasco from Vintage to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Tuff area: 15,021 square feet The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak CT. to Vintage. The south side of Vintage From Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage to Mt. San Antonio CT. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet CC-14 CC-15 CC-16 CC-17 CC-18 CC-19 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage to Mt. Wilson CT. The south side of vintage from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop From Mt. Waverly CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge CT. to Woodland CT. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop CT. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop pasco from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman CT. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Tuff area: 7,699 square feet The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester. The north side of Vintage from Rochester to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson CT. to Mt. Cambridge CT. The Netherlands View Loop pasco from Vintage to Mt. Sterling CT. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Tuff area: 3,954 square feet The east side of Milliken from Vintage to Banyan .Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Tuff area: 9,088 square feet The north side of Vintage from Milliken to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage from 104 feet west of Hillview to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Tuff area: 3,889 square feet July 1, 2002 a reduction of 622 sq. feet of G. C. and4710 sq. feet of turf because a new street was installed south o Vintage. The Terrace View Loop pasco fxom Vintage to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,496 square feet Tuffarea: 15,617 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio CT. to E1 Capitan CT. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak Pl. to Mt San Antonio CT. .G-round Cover area: 20,627 square feet Tuff area: 20,017 square feet CC-21 CC-22 CC-23 CC-24 CC-25 CC-26 CC-27 CC-28 CC-29 The west side of Rochester fi.om Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet This site was re-landscaped due to freeway being installed and 18,692 sq feet was reduced fi.om this site and is now part of CC-26. The south side of Vintage fi.om Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview loop fi.om Vintage to Mt. Rainer CT. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet The south side of Banyan fi.om Milliken to Butler Peak Pl. The west side of Butler Peak Pl. fi.om Banyan to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop fi.om Butler Peak Pl. to Rainbow Falls CT. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet The north side of Terrace View Loop From E1 Capitan CT. to Butler Peak Pl. The east side of Butler Peak Pl. fi.om Terrace View Loop to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Butler Peak Pl. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak Pl. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet This site was moved to CC-13. This mainline was part of CC-13 and should not of been its own site. The east side of Rochester fi.om 210 freeway to Vintage. The north and south side of Vintage from to Rochester to Thunder Mountain. The wes[side of Rochester fi.om 317 feet south of Vintage to the 210 Freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Due to freeway being built this area was relandscaped January 7, 2005 and 16825 square feet was added to this side. The Milliken median and the westside of Milliken fi.om 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 Freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 The east side of Milliken fi.om Vintage to the 210 freeway right of way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet The Milliken median from Banyan to 1420 feet north of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 4,240 square feet 8 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #6 ara for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system rapair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 ara as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Part-Time Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Subtotal Operations $19,620.00 $6,140.00 $10,160.00 $13,550.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $81,800.00 $5,460.00 $285,830.00 $27,770.00 $35,920.00 $415,510.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD ~6 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $33,590.00 $485,020.00 $170,380.22 $314,639.78 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family EDU Value Multiplier 1.00 Parcel l0 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $246.97 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1274 1.0 1274 $246.97 $314,639.78 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor 'and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 No Annexations Section $ - Assessment Diagrams: !-'i '- r'-J ! ! ! ! Hillside Rd] ! ! % Banyan ~ Cth Baso Foothill 81vd Arrow Rt Landscape Maintenance District 6 Wilson Av 4th St Legend ~'%~,~ City Limits ~ll LMD 6 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March,, 2005. Approved by://~/xJ///[../~...,~ ~/~//~f~ ~/~/ill~-am J~ ~)~i!,~VE-~i~e~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 9 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................ 10 A. GENERAL ................................................................... 10 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .............................. ~ ..... 10 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 11 SECTION 4- ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 12 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 13 III Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roil states the net amount to be assessed upon ail assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE IH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 SITE LOCATIONS Site # EN-1 EN-2 San EN-3 EN4 to EN-5 Descriptive Location The Northside of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline: The Eastside of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia, The southside of Arcadia from Ridgeline to 77 feet east of Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet The Metropolitan Water District easement on the southside of Crescenta Way from Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet The Wilson Median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 15,706 square feet The Planters on the northside of the drainage easement that is between and parallel Highland and Arapaho east of Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet The southside of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The Landscape east of San Sevaine from 24th to south end tract. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet EN-6 Ridgeline EN-7 of as Turf area: 3,527 square feet The northside of Wilson fi.om Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The westside of from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from 24th street to 857 feet north Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet EN-8 EN-9 EN-10 feet EN-11 EN-12 EN-13 EN-14 The southside of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet The pasco from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet The pasco from Etiwanda to North Rim Way. The westside of Etiwanda from 175 north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prafie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7-16-01, however, this site is still the city's property. Old Ground Cover area:3,548 square feet Old Turf area: 800 square feet The cul-de-sac on the northside of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet The east side of San Sevaine fi.om Wilson to 136 feet north of Creseenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet The west side of San Sevaine from 150' north of Wilson to 136' north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet EN-15 EN-16 EN-17 EN-18 EN-19 EN-20 EN-21 EN-22 EN-23 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the lzail head to 254 feet north oftrailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guldera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 475 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotfi. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet The southside or Wilson from Estates Way to Hanley. Ground Cover area: 14,207 square feet The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson meidan from Etiwanda To Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda From Wilson To Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The eastside of Efiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet 7 EN-24 EN~25 EN-26 EN-27 EN-28 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34~707 square feet The eastside of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet The southside of Banyan fi'om Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet The southside of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The westside of Cervantes fi.om Cannel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo fi.om Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the westside of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the southside of Tejas fi.om Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet 8 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows: Personnel Regular Payroll Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Trees Parks Facilities Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Equipment Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance CVWD Manditory Annual Backflow Cert. Tree Maintenance Parks Facilities Subtotal Operations 140,690.00 24,740.00 71,170.00 $28,190.00 $3,000.00 $13,100.00 $6,000.00 $2,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $95,000.00 $3,150.00 $17,960.00 $260,730.00 $3,500.00 $14,680.00 $40,130.00 $9,000.00 $236,600.00 $497,940.00 Capital Outlay Vehicles Subtotal - Capital Outlay $16,000.00 $16,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $45,800.00 Total LMD #7 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $796,340.00 $287,558.15 $508,781.85 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel Comm/Ind 2.00 Acre ]0 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $307.05 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1647 1.00 1647 $307.05 $505,711.35 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50 Total $508,781.85 C. Assessment All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 1! Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 PM 16180 4 SF 9/15/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: Hillside Ri %. Banyan S~ Landscape Maintenance District 7 ¥ Limits LMD 7 ~~~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 EXHIBIT "A"-~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCP~PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 '2 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATUE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A"- ~}- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. [ AND 7 VIL S~N AVE s'r-P-E~-T 7-t~ ~ 17o ~-A. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTll Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (SoUth Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of Marc, h, 2005. Approved by///~/.. 1 Will(am J. O'Nei~i~gineer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 7 A. GENERAL ....................................................... ; ............. 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS .............................................................. 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda South Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those pamels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees and community trails. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS Site # SE-1 SE-2 SE-3 Descriptive Location The eastside of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa to 182 feet north of Catalpa. The north and south side of Catalpa from; East Ave. to Brownstone. Ground Cover area: Turf area: LMD-8 TOTAL GROUND COVER: LMD-8 TOTAL TURF: 10,355 square feet 6,258 square feet The south side of Highland from 361 feet east of East Avenue, to 210 feet East of Starstone. Ground Cover area: 16,686 square feet The south side of Fischer from 860 feet West of Mulberry to Mulberry. Ground Cover area: 6,630 square feet 33,671 square feet 6,258 square feet Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Vehicle Maintenance and Operations Utilities Water Utilities Telephone Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Subtotal Operations $2,080.00 $8OO.OO $3,230.00 $530.00 $740.00 $27,640.00 $21,000.00 $56,020.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD #8 Expenditure Budget Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $2,940.00 $58,960.00 $30,638.85 $28,321.15 6 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family EDU Value Multiplier 1.00 Parcel 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $151.45 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 187 1.0 187 $151.45 $28,321.15 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4- Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16542 11 SF 5/19/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: ! Hill$ido Rdi ! ! ! ! ! ! i Landscape Maintenance District 8 i Wilson Av Base Line Rd oothill Blvd Arrow 8th St E ~ 6th Arrow Rt i ! ! ...... j Legend ~"%~,,~ City Limits ~, LMD 8 uJ 4th St ~ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 -- EXHIBIT ~A~- ~. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREE~ LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 - I I ST~-E~T LI~-HT~ ~- ST, P--E'~z'T' T,P--~ E ~ ~4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) · ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. William J. O'Neil Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................. $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................. 8 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT .................. 9 A. GENERAL ..' ................................................................... 9 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 9 C. ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 10 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 1 t SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................. 12 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: SCHEDULE IV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 SITE LOCATIONS Site # 94 9-2 9-3 Descriptive Location The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 4,426 square feet Hardscape area: 7,360 square feet The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 feet north ofBrookfield. Brookfield fxom East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 5 9-4 9-5 9-6 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet The north side of Miller From 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet · Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 6 7 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #9 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #9 are as follows: Personnel Regular Salaries $4,180.00 Part-time Salaries $7,190.00 Fringe Benefits $2,700.00 Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping $7,650.00 Facilities $2,170.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental $200.00 Utilities Water Utilities $8,000.00 Electric Utilities $1,300.00 Contract Services Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Facilities Subtotal Operations $31,210.00 $2,210.00 $4,000.00 $14,070.00 $56,740.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Vehicles Outlay/Computer Subtotal Capital Expenditures $16,000.00 $0.00 $16,000.00 Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total LMD #9 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $43,410.00 $130,220.00 $525,367.04 $655,587.04 Section 3 - Method of AsseSsment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS PropertTType EDU Value Multiplier Single Family 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family 1.00 Unit 9 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $375.91 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 785 1.0 785 $375.91 $295,089.35 Multi-Family Unit 958 1 958 $375.91 $360,121.78 Comm/Ind Parcel 1 1 1 $375.91 $375.91 Total $655,587.04 C. Assessment All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 10 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 I Comm/Ind 3/17/2004 TR 16464 36 SF 8/4/2004 ]! Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: .i...J I I I i ! Banyan S~.~ ! i. ! ! I Landscape Maintenance District 9 ! , i Wilson Av Base Line Rd '! Foothill BlYd )ase Line Rd :oothill BIvd Arrow Rt i ! Legend ~'%-.~ City Limits M LMD 9 UJ · - ..c 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ ~ ;7, ~ Mile.' EXHIBIT "A- 5# ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. al STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 'i ST,~'T' L15-1-1T: 74- ~A. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH EXH1BFF "A '~ # ASSESSMENT DiAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET [;IGHTIN(~ 'MAINTEN'ANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 MILLER . PROJECT t FO O'.TH I.L L cn-v o~' r~ANCHO CVC^MONC^ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO. 80ULEVARD NORTH -' EXHIBIT 'A - " ASSESSMENT- DIAGRAM ' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND NORTH ...~ ~ ~-.~:~ EXHIBIT "A - ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTM NO. q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE'DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 STgEET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH TRACT TOLL 79 LOT NO. 16279 BROTHERS SUBDIVISION 1-210 ',% CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP t i tie; page Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved by//~ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................. 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................ 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................. 7 A. GENERAL .................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ..................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ............................................................. 9 SECTION 5- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................ 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Improvements The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Improvements: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (LMD #10) represents landscape sites throughout the Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and a neighborhood park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Ground, Cover, Shr~Jbs and Turf p~..~.,...- ._ - .. .... . .. , · . ; _',_ ~ - . :' ..,.,. : "TotalAr~a .... 10 40 A~ . . Ground .cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. 5 Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The budgeted costs for LMD #10 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover, shrubs and the neighborhood park. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing, are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #10 are as follows: Personnel Regular Salaries Over Time Part-time Salaries Fringe Bener~s Subtotal Personnel Operations Maintenance and Operations Landscaping Parks Facilities Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental Equipment Maintenance Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Contract Services Parks Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance Facilities Tree Maintenance Subtotal Operations $6,270.00 $1,000.00 $25,250.00 $5,340.00 $3,75O.OO $8,500.00 $4,000.0O $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $37,000.00 $32,000.00 $25,380.00 $84,570.00 $9,000.00 $2,46O.O0 $37,860.00 $208,660.00 Capital Expenditures Outlay/Vehicles Subtotal Capital Expenditures $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Reserve for Capital Maintenance and Improvements $0.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 31,780 Total LMD #10 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $286,300.00 $114,944.48 $401,244.48 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Non-Residential Improved Single Family Residential EDU Value Multiplier 2.00 Acres 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $597.09 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use T~/pe Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 672 1.00 672 $597.09 $401,244.48 Total $401,244.48 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16100 29 SF 9/15/2004 TR 14493 15 SF 10/6/2004 Section 5 - Assessment Diagrams: ! I Hillside R~I Banyan 19th St ~__ ! Foothill Blvd ! ! ! ! ! I Landscape Maintenance District 10 i ~ '<l t.-.~ ! ! ! I Wilson Av =e Rd Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt _ ~ o Arrow Rt Legend ~: ~"~...~ City Limits uJ LMD 10 .c ~ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ o o u~ ~ Miles n, 'O^gB ~33B0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: A-2 T L~b Io qS'- Annex to LMD 10, SLD 1 and SLD 7 TRACT 14493 EXHIBIT "A '"".~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET'LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 i I TeE e T $T~ZE ~f- ?BEES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTll Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bemardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant areas therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The urCdersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. ApprovedDated this 16th day of March, 2005. TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 'SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ....... : ........... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 ($LD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the citywide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon the energizing of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #1 are for electric utility charges for the streetlights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: ...................................................................................... Operations Equip Maintenance and Operations Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $500.00 $449,930.00 $450,430.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $178,570.00 Total SLD #1 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $629,000.00 $47,466.23 $676,466.23 Section 3 - Method of AssesSment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any fonwula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Commercial Multi-F'amily Single F.amily Residential EDU Value Multiplier 2.00 Acres 1.00 Parcel 1.00 Parcel It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $17.77 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Rate per # of Equivalent # of Equivalent Physical Physcial Dwelling Equivalent Dwelling Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Dwelling Unit Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 22,205 1.00 22,205.00 $17.77 $394,582.85 Multi-Family Parcel 10,449 1.00 10,449.00 $17.77 $185,678.73 Commercial Acre 2,706.94 2.00 5,413.88 $17.77 $96,204.65 Total $676,466.23 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bemardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 PM 16365 11.84 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16370 82 SF 2/18/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 T.R 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00606 19.55 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16123 2 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16124 0.99 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16125 .87 AC 3/3/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 .42 AC 3/17/2004 TI:{ 16612 186 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 200300569 16.88 AC 4/7/2004 TR 16374 25 SFD 4/7/2004 DRC 2002-00006 2.3 AC 5/5/2004 TR 16512 168 MF 5/5/2004 DRC 2003-00302 1.42 AC 5/19/2004 TR 16542 11 SF 5/19/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 DRC 2003-00732 18.10 AC 6/16/2004 PM 15716-2 13.3 AC 7/7/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 164,,.',,.',,.',,.',54 36 SF 8/4/2004 ']-rR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 DRC 2002-00018 2.71 AC 8/18/2004 PM 16118 4.49 AC 9/1/2004 PROJECT UNITS DRC 2003-00656 .32 AC TR 16100 29 SF TR 16421 8 SF PM 1618O 4 SF TR 16274 7 SF TR 14493 15 SF PM 16282 6.93 AC PM 16482 2 SF PM 16038 4 SF PM 16300 14.68 AC TR 16301 53 SF TR 16445 17 SF ANNEX DATE 9/1/2004 9/15/2004 9/15/2004 9/15/2004 9/15/2004 10/6/2004 10/20/2004 10/20/2004 11/17/2004 12/15/2004 12/15/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: 10 Street Light Maintenance District Hillside Banyan Wilson Av 19th Base Line Rd 3ase Line Rd Foothill Blvd 8th S~ ~'6thS Legend ~"..=~ City Limits ~ SLD I ~ ~ =~ 0 0.250. ~ ~.5 o L[J ~' ~ Miles Road N~ 19.7 Acres Winery 23.9 Acres Farni~ Acre TemPle Pr~par~ Mixed Use · ~ A~t~ J thlII Boulevard Ir/ rea is comprised of approximatelY-: OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM:· TITLE: EXHIBIT: A NORTH TRACT NO. 16279 ~ TOLL BROTHERS 79 LOT SUBDIVISION 1-210 ,:.:....,:.-.t':.:: ::~ L ,'::'-" I I',~ ......., ,. . . , ~.,..,,,,.~. ?,, . ~.o~,· ..-.~.' ',/ '~4~/~/~2p~,-.~ z..~~ · .....>. ....?.~..~ ~,~ .......... ~ ~, ~.;.~.5.~x ~..~ ..... - .,, I .... '... ,.~....-.x.. ~.~. "?'.? ~.~//~' ,.-?~. ~ ,/' ..'-.4, ~...., ...,..... ~,,,..:...:,.;.;~;~..,....-~ ~;~....,-.~..~.,,~. ~:~..? ~,~,~.~.~.~.~,,¢.~-,..,.....,., ~ ~cc:.mo,. title; ~0r. ....... .~.,~ :CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N u~7_ .> VICINITY MAP ~ m~n page / ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIgTRIGT NO. I STREET LIGHTI~/G MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 2 12095.26 sq. ft. 0.27a ac. LEGEND ,,~1['z.-$5'oo L sT. LIC~t-.IT$ $1 'I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY Or S~,S STATr O~ C_AU~Or~i^ NORTH -*. EXHIBIT ASSE$SIVIENT DIAGRAM ~DSCA~,S :~nvrS~ANCS D~Sr~UCT ~o. STREET Li~3HTirNo MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I.AND EASEMENT LINE PORN 1/:2. J~E 1/4 .NE 1/4 ,gEC, I0, TlS R7W SEtM PER MAP OF D,'Jc. Ait/]OiVEiA LANDs MB4/ps~9 LEGEND ' ~ ~ "~ ~ I&~ooo L HP,$V 5TRE£T LtGH"r' CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORN~,~ NORT/! TRACT 16371 LOT 2 LOT A ~ LOT I 15 TRACT 16373 TRACT 16615 VICTORIA ARBORS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 B ._j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBrr STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO~. I AND 6 .I SAN MARIN~. PARCEL N~A? 1~,118 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOR. Til PARCEL MAP 'O^gB ~33B0 ~33 3SaO~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t~.NGINEERING DIVISION 'O EX~IIBIT: A-2 '7 Lt~[~ Annex to LIVID 10, SLD 1 and SLD 7 TRACT 14493 · . EXHIBIT '%" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIC"F NO. STREET LIOHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 15 **"' 14 W-ILSON 2 LOOP 6 217.75' 16 5 ;/.q.) TI:tACT 1'40. 16274 6 LOOP (N 89'49'I0' E 659.98' LOOP 7 442.24' I ! AVENUE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTll EXHIBIT "A"-~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCA~PE MAIrNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STP~EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 '2 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(~A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STAT. E OF CALIFORNIA EX{IIBFr ASS~SS~:m' m^~m,dv~ LANDSCAPE MAIN'~NANC£ DIsTRIcT NO. 3B S'I'P~ET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 Building. A - 236,400 SFI /' ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ;:' gL DG, A BLb6. F jE,~$E Y' . . Bi- ! ! LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(~A COUNTY OF SAN BI~.RNARDINO sTATE OF CALIFORNIA NOR'i{ I DRczo05-O08~,6, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD/NO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII EXHIBIT "A"-',.~ 'ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~n STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTll · , ~ £XHIBIT ASSESSMEI~[T DIAGRAB,I LANDSCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B sTREET. LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND fi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY' OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRCZO03-OO~50 EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ':'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 BANYAN. o 5 6 2 8 9 10 [cOT -~ LEGEND 5 - $800 L ST~:£'r 1./6/'-/7J' 2- 95'00 L ~TR~:-T LICHr$ 3i- 5TREEY ~REE~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII~ EXHIB[T "A- 5~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. =1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND $ . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH EXHIBIT "A"- ,,~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM EAND$CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTI! EXHIBIT "A"-,~t- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STKEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 VIL S£N AVE 15 $ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA N 0 RT ! I EJ(HIBIT "A" ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 TRACT 16430 LMD AREa-xxxxx CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO VICINITY MAP I-I I I CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO#GA CITY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTil CITY OF R-A~cHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIINO A LANDSCAPE IvIAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO . STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT NOS. CIVIC CENTER cITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA COUNTY OF SAN BF. RNARI')INF~ i NORTH 9/ EXHIBIT "A"- ~Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 · I I ' I I I I I LI -HT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTll FOOTHILL N w . ~ SUBJ .'C S ARROW ROUTE g 8TH STREET VICINITY MAp NO SCALE PROPERTY OF .ANCHO CUCAMONGA N ~NOIN~.k~RrNG DIVISION EXPTT'R~:'~'S~ KOCK EXHIBIT "A" - ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. '4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .A NORTH -- HIIIIIIIIFJHI IIH I'1'1 IIIIIII1:::t I~t11111 IIIIII IIIIIIIii111111 E ,DRC2002-00006 City of Rancho Cucamon.q~ F.,XHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L&NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MArNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6 ---ELM'. )Rczoo -ooj.:_~.~3 PAROEL:5.. G ir~ ? · ROU'rF_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NORTH- .< Hlffi AV i=te.p~ .IflTH BANYAN LEMON AV <: VIC N. IT~ ~'I~OJEGT h4AF~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: P,~.C ZO0~. - O0.~qZ TITLE: V/E/I,.IlTY MAt:' EXHIBIT: /' EXHIBIT "A" - ~ ''~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B.^N.D I ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 6TH ST. ~' PROJECT, LOCATION 4TH ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT "A ~'~ # ASSESSMENT'DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET I4OHTING 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS; I AND 8 MILLER PROJECT FO O TH I.~L L ' ,r/y ef C~T¥ Ol~ r~tvc.o CvC^~oNc^ COUNTy op SAN BE~ARv~NO' BOULEVARD NORTH D~-V~I..oPMI~NT ~CTORIA AFIBOR8 ~' Al' ItIIIIttlIIttH! TRACT NO, 1S~48 'I~,ACT NO. 15947 [,~ STANDARD pACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15"/15 TRACT .INDEX Wn'H PLANNING AREAS \~I~ :'1"I ~RI .\ ~1~,1f( ~!,~~' :OOTHtLL subj LEGEND Subject Sits - Proposed Shopping Cenler Major St,feets City Boundary " ASSESSMENT DIAGRAIVI t. ANUSCA~£ MA~ANC£ D~S'n~CT NO. ~a STP~I~T C~Ol,'~l~O I~,A~ANC£ DtSTP, ICT NOS. ,~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i~ORTll COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A" ASsEssMrEI'gT DIAGRAM LAI';'q)sCApE IVlAIN'fENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 # a~',,14.:.~.- w aea.41' E. 1/"2, SEC... I 4, I LOT I ..3 I I .~'1 lt.' ~ ~'1' ~ I'. ~ I'-,' ~*~~~,., i{: --~l~.'l' S' le ' . .-- ~ _ ,,: . ~ 'l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~. EXHIBIT "A- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 BTF. EE 7- L/~-I-/TS ~TF-EET No~l- Tug? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT 'A" ASsESSMEHT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET L1GHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRJCT NOS. ! AND 6. ~ONROE COURT LE EKI'D ~ STRE. ET LIGHT I(~,000 LLI~EN HPSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7fl-lf NORTII EXHIBIT 'A' A~SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCA?E 1vIArNTEIqANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING I~INTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. COURT LF_( F_ND ~ STREETLi~NT IG, O00 LUM, F_.N 2.-- N~.W ST~F-gT HPSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RTATF. OF CALIFORNIA NORTil EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 38 sTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 6. "5TI-?~.ETLICd-IT$ ~-XISTIIq~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORT;I bR(.:2002-.-00(~00 EXHIBIT 'A - Z~' ASSESSMEN~ DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MA~ANCE DISTRICT NO. sTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA ~ I 0 :: 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 I TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 VICTORIA ARBORS AVENUE' VICTORIA pARK LANE PROJECT SITE FOOTHILL VI~TORIR GARDENS BOULEVARD VICINITY MAP cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA ENGINEERING DIVISION · ITEM: _ " TITLE: ~ EXHIBIT: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBIT *A" ASSESSMENT DIAGI~dVl LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B S'I'I~ET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND $ ARROW ROUTE ~0.99' ~ Nb9'24'13"1~ 3G5.34' 333.Z~' 332.34' WHI'I-rRAM AVENUE LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA COUNTY OF SAN BER1NARDINO .~TATE OF CALIFORiNIA NORTil b~.2ooz-o~i J · · ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · i.ANDSCApE MAINTENANCE DisTRIcT NO. STREE~ LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .ORT,E] ~b COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO EXHIBrr "A - ?-' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTM NO. q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 .{ STKEET L?r_d-IT~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH F._J(HIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A, NOR, Til 7¢ 4 PARCEL I I · Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved b y '~//~,~(~'/'> l~ ,// Wil~am J. (~'Neil,//Ci{y 'En-gi~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #2 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $294,000.00 $ 294,000.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD #2 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $ 54,930.00 $ 348,930.00 $ 55,028.99 $ 293,901.01 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the impro~/ements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial Multi-Family Single Family Residential 2.00 Acres 1.00 Unit 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $39.97 for the FY 2005/2008. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use T~/pe Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 6216 1.00 6216 $39.97 $248,453.52 Commemial Acre 25.02 2.00 50.04 $39.97 $ 2,000.10 Multi-Family Unit 1087 1.00 1087 $39.97 $43,447.39 Total $293,901.01 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the Distdct for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16432 28 SF 3/312004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/1512004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: Street Light Maintenance District 2 ~ I .I Wilson Av 19th Base Line Rd Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd An'ow Rt ~rrow Rt 8th St P ~ 6th Legend ~'~.,~, City Limits N SLD 2 -o~:~ Cth St m 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 u~ ~ Miles EXHIBIT "A"- ,~ ASSESSMENT DIA~P, AM LANDSCAPE MAII"Flr'EIVANCE DISTRICT NO, ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTI! EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM · LAIqDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 5 BANYAN. o STREET 8 2 9 10 LoT ~ EXISTS\lO TRACT LEGEND - $800 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII~ TR A V.E. '7-11 'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTI~ICT NOS. I AND 2 -4, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTll EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 N Iz~193, 2 1 LOOP 6 WlI~ON 5 :Lq.) a TRACT NO. 16274. 6~g.98' LOOP 6 LOOP ,1 AVENUE ,~.~.~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN~ NORTII EXH]BFi' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAND,qCAPE MAINTENANCE Dis~RICT NO. ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISIRICT NOS. I AND 2 3 790l .24 (LIE! 2 ~ LEC~EIVD ~f,, )g.~-seoo ~ s'c. 794,9.10 sq. ft. 0.182 ac. N 65.21' DIAMOND AVI~NU~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASsEsSlviENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO . STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "{~OP, T. (~/ COUNTY OF SAN RF. RNA~IMNC{ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION TITLE: EXHIBIT: EXHIBIT "A- ~-'~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 ~'T~.EET LI~-HT'~ 14 FA. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF. SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting 'Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of Mar.ch, 2005. ~ / William J. O'Nei~r~ Engin~?j~ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 10, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance,' operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #3 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $5,000.00 $217,740.00 $222,740.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD ~L3 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $51,800.00 $274,540.00 $6,593.76 $281,133.76 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value MultiPlier Commercial 2.00 Acres Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $47.15 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Equivalent Equivalent Rate per Physical Physical Dwelling Unit Dwelling Equivalent Land Use Unit type Units Factor Units Dwelling Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5678 1.0 5678 $47.15 $267,717.70 Multi-Family Parcel 310 1.0 310 $47.15 $5,846.60 Commercial Acre 69.32 2.0 138.64 $47.15 $6,536.88 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 Total $281,133.76 C. Assessment All assessed lots or pamels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16365 11.84 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16370 82 SF 2/18/2004 TR 16612 186 MF ' 3/17/2004 TR 16374 25 SFD 4/7/2004 PM 15716-2 13,3 AC 7/7/2004 TR 16301 53 SF 12/15/2004 TR 16445 17 SF 12/15/2004 Section $ -Assessment Diagrams: .r-!=== <.= =-=. o.- <=· ~= Street Light Maintenance District 3 l'-'~ ~ E E .- Hillside Rdi Banyan ! '= >i. ~ I _> i i '= · i '~ I - .~ \ 10th St ~ ~ ~ Base Line R~t~ f.~i ~thill Blvd~~ ~ow Rti I 8th St, ............. ~.~ > ~ ~*~"~ 4th ~ t...: ! .i I I ~ ! I ! Wilson Av Foothill Blvd Legend ~"*.,~ City Limits ~SLD 3 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 pmD~ TRACT 16371 LOT 2 LOT A LOT I 6615 TRACT 16373 "~"~"' TRACT 16615 J~7:::::-- ' ....... ' --=="'-" l VICTORIA ARBORS VICINITY MAP r~r · k CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pit DEVELOPMENT AT VICTORIA ARBOR8 VICTORIA ARBOR8 DEVEEOPMENT EXHIbiT TRACT I,'~ STANDARD PA~I FIC HOMES i615 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 45Yt6 TRACT INDEX WITH PLANNING AREAS LO'~ION MAP FOOTHILL Subj LEGEND Subject Bite- Proposed Bhopping Center Major Btreets City Boundary TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 45716 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16370 VICTORIA ARBORS V~CTOR~ pARK L~J~£ PROJEC'[ SITE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD VICINITY MAP c~'r,~ o~= .A.C,O cuC~ao"s^ ITEM: TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT:_ .,. 19.7 ACres Wine~/ SenSe Faro~/ 23.~ Acres · IO:b Acres Single Fami¥ ~- 10/Atre Single Fam~y 4-~ Acre I'~xed Use ,thH~ Boulevard area is comprised of approximately: OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: NORTH EXHIBIT: Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Term Vista Planned Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. , ' A p p rove d b y~.~{,~l ~//~ ~ ~Vil~iam J; b'Nei~, Ci~/Engin( [! TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL .................................................. . ................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 III Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon ail assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section 1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #-4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof ) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's apprevai. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district.street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD ~ are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Equipment Maintenance Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $38,640.00 $500.0O $81,820.00 $120,960.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $30,180.00 Total SLD #4 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $151,140.00 $26,471.68 $177,611.68 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the Single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial 2.00 Acres Multi-Family 0.5 Unit Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $28.96 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physcial Physcial Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Multi-Family Unit 6043 0.5 3021.50 $28.96 $87,502.64 Single Family Pamel 2653 1.0 2653.00 $28.96 $76,830.88 Commercial Acre 229.25 2.0 458.50 $28.96 $13~278.16 Total $177,611.68 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16512 168 MF 5/5~2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: r,-! Hillside R~ ! \ Banyan S~\ 10th St ,_~,%. Base Line Rd ! .i Foothill BlYd Arrow Rt 8th St ~ ~ 6th ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Street Light Maintenance District 4 ! I ~ ~ L...~. ! ~ m I ! Wilson Av rY Base Line Rd Legend ~'"%,,~ City Limits SLD 4 ~c '~ ~. ~ ~th St O .c 0 0.250.5 1 ~ ~ LU-- 1.5 E,~d-{IBIT "A" - ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIST~CT NO. 4 STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4.. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA No~m,I Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. $ (Caryn Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant sections therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. Approved ,/ William J. O'Nei~City Engin& 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION I - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. 4 Section I - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #5 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $5,000.00 $52,790.00 $57,790.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD #5 Expenditure Budget Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required $10,180.00 $67,970.00 $23,924.20 $44,045.80 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $34.60 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # Of Rate per # Of Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Unit Physical Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Land Use Type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 1273 1.00 1274 34.60 $44,080.40 Total $44,045.80 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and pamels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. $ No Annexations Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: :.-., : i ! I Hillside Rdj ! ! \. Banyan Base Line Rd Arrow Rt Street Light Maintenance District 5 = i r'---'- ...... >_ _~ l_.. ! -~ I ~ ! <= I I Wilson Av Rd Foothill Blvd ~rrow Rt ! Legend ~"~.,~ City Limits SLD 5 ~th St 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, pamels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of March, 2005. ~ Ap p roved by,~/~/~,,~, ,~/.,_~ i.,,~'~' ~/ I~/illiam J. O'Neil,/'City Enginee 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4- ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses 'An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section '1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #6 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Operations Maintenance and Operations Equipment Maintenance Contract Services Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $800.00 $400.00 $38,200.00 $60,700.00 $100,100.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD #6 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recover/ Assessment Revenue Required $12,020.00 $112,120.00 $9,350.54 $121,470.54 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which faidy distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Assessment Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Assessment Unit (AU) method of apportionment uses an acre as the basic unit of assessment. The AU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's AU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Commercial/Industrial EDU Value Multiplier 1.00 Acres 7 It is recommended that the rate per Assessment Unit (AU.) remain at $51.40 for the FY 2005/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: # of # of Rate per Physical Physical Assessement Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit type Units Unit Factor Units Unit Comm/Industrial Acre 2363.24 1 Revenue 2363.24 $51.40 $121,470.54 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels Within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2/4/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00606 19.55 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16123 2 AC 3~3/2004 PM 16124 0.99 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16125 .87 AC 3/3/2004 PM 16245 4.22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2003-00869 16.88 AC 4/7/2004 DRC 2002-00006 2.3 AC 5/5/2004 DRC 2003-00302 1.42 AC 5/19/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 DRC 2003-00732 18.10AC 6/16/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 DRC 2002-00018 2.71 AC 811812004 PM 16118 4.49 AC 9/1/2004 DRC 2003-00650 .32 AC 911/2004 PM 16282 6.93 AC 1012012004 PM 16300 14.58 AC 12/1/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: 10 Street Light Maintenance District 6 19th ~ Base Line Rd I Foothill Blvd Foothill BIvd Arrow Rt Arrow Rt 8th St ~ 6th ._= Legend ~'%*,.~ City Limits SLD 6 4th St -= 0 0.250.5 1 UJ n, 1.5 EXHIBIT ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM · LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STR. EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTPdCT NOS. ! AND 6 ,Fpo'tH! ILL LE.~E'ND · B L~/O. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTi~ l DRCZO03-O0~O ~HIBIT "A" t.~msc~, uan, rr~c~- uts-truer ~o. ~ STP,.EET LIGHTING IvIArNTEI'qANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(;A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTil DRC~_003-008~,,6. EXHIBIT ASSESSM]~INT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANe~ DISTraCT NO. 3B S~ET LIG~G ~EN~CE DIS~CT NOS. I AND 6 t I SAN MARINO. PARCEL MAP 1~,118 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE'MA[NTEN. ANC£ DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AI~D 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTi! -i~ ~?- ~ _ _ _ 550_0" .", -~.- 315' PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE T18 FI7W SBI~ PER MAp OF DUCAMON~A LAAID,..q MB4/p~9 POFI N I/_P. JVE 1/4 185' ~~_ 500' · ~ I~ooo L' HPSV 5TR~'ET · , Nt~d .STRF..ET TRE. E$ I-IGHT' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFOr~Nr,~ NORTil LANDSCApa MAINTENANC£ DISTRICT NO . STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i .' ' - _. C1¥1C CENTER · Q~-~T Z/ANTS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A NORTil CITY OF'R-ANcHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERHARDI~O STATE Cqq, ~a g.l~r~D~ ^ I I I cITy OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTil FOOTHILL ARROW ROUTE 8TH STREET VICINITY MAP PROPERTY OF :ANCHO CUCAMONGA N DIVISION F,X.~IT: ' .~,". ~' -q,l" N DRC2002-00006 City of Rancho Cucamon.qa EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIN 1 ~NANC£ DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHT/NO MAfNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND6 --ELM'. '~ 5800 LUMEN HPSV 3-STREET TR~£5 ADDED 'FO .L-A,~,D ~0. 5-~- : .PAR~L~ ~, ar~ 7' ?/v~ M I q. ti- · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOINGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH- " ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAI1WTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AN'i) I ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 6TH ST. Iii I~l PROJ LOCATION 4TH ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ASSESSMENT DIACRA~ s'r~-T ~orrr~o ~nTr~,~¢~_ ~STmCT ~OS. ~ ^~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r~oR'r~! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ S STATE OF CALIFORNIA Z)~,~.3-,,"~J~q EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STRE~I' LIGHTING MAI'NTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 °1 E. ~/2,. SEC... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTI[ EXHIBIT ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. 6AONROF-- COURT L£6F_ND -- ~ STRr-ETLIr~NT 3- N~-W sTRE£T IG, O00 LU/~EN "E'P,.~5 HPSV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA )TEll NORTII E2(HIBIT 'A" ^Ss ss :r T - LANDSCAPE MAINTEN~CE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAI]q'i'EN'~d~{CE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6. COURT L£(iF_.ND ~ STRF_.,ETLIGHT l~,O00 LUJ~EN CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~"rATle. OF CALIFORNIA NORTII EXHIBIT ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B 'sTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 ~T ~EE.T .ST, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 mi CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ~o~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~ ST~T~ o'~ CA~,~On~,~ ~~-d~4{ EXHIBIT "A" ' ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B sTREET LIGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ARROW ROUTE 333.~,9' ~2.~ 293.3 I.' N~9o24, 13,,E (330.20' WHITTRAM AVENUE LEGEND .STl~E~'fiLIqr~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~'r&T~. OF CALIFORNIA NORTII EXHIBFF ASSESSMEr~T DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 6 STREET 's~EET T~EES ' ' N.¥~$oP = I~ea. & ~ -- ~oe~.: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A-_'5 : NOI~Til 7(/ . Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District, The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council, Dated this 16th day of March?2005. Approved 'illiam J. O'Neil 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ 5 SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4 - AN NEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION 5 - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 3 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7, refer to the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. Section 1 - Description of'Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north 'of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the city. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #7 are for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities Subtotal Operations $15,840.00 $15,840.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD #7 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $15,220.00 $31,060.00 $34,213.88 $65,273.88 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Commercial/Industrial Single Family Residential 2.00 Acres 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $33.32 for the FY 2005/2006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: Equivalent Rate per Physical Unit # of Dwelling Unit # of Equivalent Equivalent Land Use Type Physical Units Factor Dwelling Unit Dwellin~ Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 1949 I 1949 $33.32 $64,940.68 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2 10 $33.32 $333.20 Total $65,273.88 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. 8 Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16113 23 SF 7/21/2004 TR 16100 29 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16180 4 SF 9/15/2004 TR 14493 15 SF 10/6/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: r": ! I Hillside R~. Banyan ! ! ! ! ! Street Light Maintenance District 7 Wilson Av Base Line Rd I .J Foothill Blvd Rd Arrow Rt 8th St · 6th ._ 4th Legend ~"%,.,~ City Limits SLD 7 4th St 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles EXHIBIT "A"-,,~t- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 VIL S#N AVE /! ST~-EET t_l~HTs 14- ~. STY-~T T~E~S 17o EA. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A NORTII EXHIBIT "A'""~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10. STREET'LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 111 i I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH EXHIBIT "A'o~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 '2 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTy OF SAr~ BE~A.O,NO STAT-E OF CALIFORNIA ;> 191 2O BANYAN STREET 1 2 5 5 6 7 [~' 4495 ~ ~ BLUE SPRUCE 8 9 22 21 (~) 14 15 12 11 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005/2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street.Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County, State of California This Report describes the District and all relevant zones therein including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2005/2006, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Bernardino County assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectively submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 16th day of Mar~h, 200~. ~ Approved by:/: ./V~/illiam J. O'Neil, C~'l~'ngin~ TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ............. : ........................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 - DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................ $ SECTION 2 - ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .............................. 6 SECTION 3 - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT ................... 7 A. GENERAL ...................................................................... 7 B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................... 7 C. ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 8 SECTION 4- ANNEXATIONS ................................................................ 9 SECTION $ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................. 10 Overview The FY 2005/2006 Annual Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Street Lighting and Light Act of 1972). Section 1 Description of Facilities The plans and specifications for improvements maintained by the Assessment District consist of a general description of the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements proposed to be maintained, and are attached hereto. Section 2 Estimates of Cost and Expenses An estimate of the maintenance cost of the improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for FY 2005/2006, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto. Section 3 Method of Assessment Apportionment Discuses the methodology used for calculating assessments in the District. The method reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for FY 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report Section 4 Annexations List the developments, which have annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District within Calendar year 2004. Section 5 Assessment Diagrams Shows the boundaries of the areas to be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and the general boundaries of the District. For details regarding the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8, refer to the San Bernardin0 County Assessor's maps. 4 Section '1 - Description of Facilities: Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district.. Section 2 - Estimate of Costs and Expenses: The majority of the budgeted operating costs for SLD #8 is for electric utility charges for the street lights and traffic signals within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Operations Electric Utilities $3,960.00 Subtotal Operations $3,960.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead Total SLD #8 Expenditure Budget Prior Year Deficit Recovery Assessment Revenue Required $27,340.00 $31,300.00 $333,112.75 $364,412.75 Section 3 - Method of Assessment Apportionment: A. General The 1972 Act permits the establishments of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment distdct may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. B. Assessment Methodology Equivalent Dwelling Units: To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate the different types of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent. Dwelling Unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one The Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDU's based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home (SFR). The EDU method of apportioning benefit is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for calculating benefit in districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from improvements are apportioned as a function of land-use type, size and development. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types to determine each parcel's EDU. LAND-USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Unit 7 It is recommended that the rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU.) remain at $193.75 for the FY 200512006. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for the district: #.of # of Equivalent Equivalent Rate per Physical Unit Physical Dwelling Unit Dwelling Equivalent Land Use type Units Factor Unit Dwellin~ Unit Revenue Single Family Unit 900 1 900 $193.75 $174,375.00 Multi-family Unit 958 1 958 $193.75 $185,612.50 Corem Acre 11.42 2 22.84 $193.75 $4,425.25 Total $364,412.75 C. Assessment All assessed lots or parcels within the District are listed on the assessment role, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer, and hereby made a part of this Engineer's Report, by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lands within the District for Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described on the County assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Engineer's Report. Section 4 - Annexations: Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE TR 16454-1 81 SF 2/4/2004 TR 16455 156 MF 2/18/2004 TR 16279-1 74 SF 3/3/2004 DRC 2002-00519 .42 AC 3/17/2004 TR 16542 11 SF 5/19/2004 TR 16454 36 SF 8/4/2004 Section 5 -Assessment Diagrams: 10 Hillside Re!, Banyan ! ! ! ! ! i. I Street Light Maintenance District 8 I · >.1 i ~ <~ L.-.~ -' ' Base Line Rd lase Line Rd Foothill Blvd Arrow RI 8th St E ~' 6th 4th St Rt Legend ~"%,,~ City Limits ~1~ SLD 8 O 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 TRACT NO. 16279 TOLL BROTHERS 79 LOT SUBDIVISION 1-210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ENGINEERING DIVISION title; page~ ~ EXHIBIT "A- ~# ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 STreET LICHHTS 74' ~. CITY OF RANCHO cUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTH EXHIBIT "A"- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 · I k STlZ~e~t T/ze E ~ 5-- E~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NORTit EXHIB IT "A ~- ~ # ASSESSMENT'DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ STREET Iz!GHTING 'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS.' 1 AND 8 MILLER PROJECT FO O'TH tLL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUnTy Or S^n BOULEVARD NORTH .55 ASSESSMENT mAGRAM L^1~OSCA?E ~^~rrEN^NC~. OIST~CT NO..q STREET LIGHTING b~dNTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 8.. ~TI~EI3T T~£g~, ~0~ [A. NORTH EXHIBIT "A - ~-' ASsEsSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTM NO. q STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE'DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 . ST~EEI' ~T'~EET' 'rt CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTH Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2005~2006 City of Rancho Cucamonga PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 Approved: William J. O'Neil, CiyEngineer TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report ............................ 3 Findings District Analysis .................... 3 Estimate of Work ..................................................................... 4 Method of Spread ............................................................... i ........ 6 Projected 2004/05 Assessments ................................................. 8 Calendar Year Annexations ................................................ 9 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PD-85 Fiscal Year 2005/2006 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2005~2006 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or pamel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972'Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the vadous areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall cf Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino; California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - 85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1. The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2. The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite reads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. The assessment rate for the 2004/2005 FY is $52.00; this rate will not increase for the 2005/06 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the district's maintenance and operation expenses for the 2005/06 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 4 Proposed Maintenance Budget: Personnel Regular Payroll Overtime Payroll Part Time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal: Operations & Maintenance Maintenance & Operations - Facilities Vehicle Maintenance & Operations Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equip. Rental Equipment Maintenance Contract Sen/ices Contract Sen/ices - Facilities Tree Maintenance Payment to Trustee Water Utilities Electric Utilities Telephone Utilities Subtotal: $362,250.00 $2,500.00 $23,940.00 $179,650.00 $92,450.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,000.00 $11,000.00 $17,800.00 $12,000.00 $13,240.00 $680,480.00 $108,150.00 $135,250.00 $5,500.00 $568,340.00 $1,099,870.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay/Equipment Assessment Admin. and General Overhead Gross Revenue Required Less Prior Year District Carryover Assessment Revenue Required: Subtotal: Subtotal: $73,800.00 $276,150.00 $73,800.00 $276,150.00 $2,018,160.00 $196,106.00 $1,822,054.00 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or pamels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A- includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size Range Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 Acres and 1,51 to 3.5 Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7,01 to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & larger 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units, The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. All properties currently tax exempt; All public ownership; Railroad mainline rights-of-way Major utility transmission rights-of-way; Mineral rights; Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2005/06, is $52.00 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $52.00 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2004/05, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3/50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres & larger Assessment per Parcel $26.00 $78.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 7 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 200512006 ASSESSMENTS: Single Family Pamels Multi-Family Pamels Less than 1.50 Acres (1084 Pamels) 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (381 Parcels) 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres (194 Parcels) 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (108 Parcels) 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (50 Pamels) 25.01 Acres or larger (18 Parcels) Number of Units 23,582 7,759 1,084 381 194 108 50 18 33,176 Assessment Rate $52.00 $52.0O $26.00 $78.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 Assessment $1,226,264.00 $403,468.00 $28,184.00 $29,718.00 $35,308.00 $39,312.00 $36,400.00 $23,400.00 $1,822,054.00 Calendar Year 2004 Annexations Parks and Recreation District - PD-8$ PROJECT UNITS ANNEX DATE PM 16010 5.95 AC 2/4/2004 PM 15966 10.73 AC 2~4~2004 DRC 2002-00499 264 MF 2/18/2004 DRC 2002-00511 2.5 AC 2/1812004 DRC 2002-00922 3.75 AC 2/18/2004 TR 16432 28 SF 3/3/2004 PM 16245 467 MF 3/17/2004 PM 16245 4,22 AC 3/17/2004 PM 15948 9.4 AC 4/7/2004 DRCDR 00-41 40.55 AC 6/6/2004 PM 16167 20.52 AC 7/21/2004 TR 16430 23 SF 7/21/2004 TTR 16545 10 SF 8/4/2004 PM 16118 4,49 AC 9/1/2004 TR 16421 8 SF 9/15/2004 TR 16274 7 SF 9/15/2004 PM 16282 6.93 AC 10/20/2004 PM 16482 2 SF 10/20/2004 PM 16038 4 SF 11/17/2004 PM 16300 14.58 AC 12/1/2004 Hillside F Banyan Assessment District 85-PD-R Wilson Av 19th: Base Line Rd Foothill Blvd Foothill BIvd Arrow R1 ~,n'ow Rt 8th St P ~ 6th r~ c Legend ~"~..,~. City Limits ~ AD-85-PD-R 'o~;~ 4th St O .~ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 = ~ Miles UJ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SlaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing and approve the Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS It is recommended that assessment rates not be increased in any of the Landscape Maintenance Districts for the FY 2005/2006. Recently imposed water and electricity rate hikes continue to be mitigated by the Districts' conservation efforts, including a program to continue computerizing the irrigation systems for the entire Districts' maintained landscape areas. These efforts are helping to keep costs down, allowing the assessment rate to be the same as the rates for FY 2004/2005. Back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties in many of the districts, which has resulted in increased revenue in those districts. In some districts, an increase in the amount of landscaped area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operations costs. This cost will be offset by an increase in revenue received from new developments in the district. In past years, any available prior year CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS May 18, 2005 Page 2 carry over was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This remains the case in some districts and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2005/2006 rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports for the Landscaping Maintenance Districts with the recommendation to Council to adopt the reports keeping assessment rates at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be added to the district's fund balance. Landscape Maintenance District Assessment Rate Per Assessment Unit LMD # 1 - General City LMD # 2 - Victoria Planned Commun'ity LMD # 3A - Hyssop LMD # 3B -Commercial/Industrial LMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community LMD # 5- Tot Lot LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community LMD # 7 - North Etiwanda LMD # 8 - South Etiwanda LMD # 9 - Lower Etiwanda LMD # 10 ~ Rancho Etiwanda $ 92.21 $422.0O $413.74 $352.80 $252.50 $113.29 $246.97 $307.05 $151.45 $375.91 $597.09 Respectfully Submitted, William'~/O. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:ED Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of March, 2005, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 05-112 to order the therein described work in connection with the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 which Resolution of Intention No. 05-112 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 for the Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 05-112, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 are hereby approved. R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE P^ RTYlENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing and approve the Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts maintain the increased expenditure levels that were instituted by the City last fiscal year as a response to the record-high Southern California Edison electric rate increases approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in 2001. Although wholesale electricity generation prices have dropped dramatically since California's electricity crisis has subsided, the CPUC projects that the increased rates may remain in effect through Fiscal year 2005/2006. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS May 18, 2005 Page 2 In the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY 2005/2006 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2005/2006 rates that are recommended to remain the same as FY 2004/05 rates. The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports for the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts with the recommendation to Council to adopt the reports keeping assessment rates at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District SLMD #1 - Arterial SLMD #2 - General City Local SLMD #3 - Victoria Planned Community SLMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Community SLMD #5 - Caryn Planned Community SLMD #6 - Commercial/Industrial SLMD #7 - North Etiwanda SLMD #8 - South Etiwanda Assessment Rate perAssessment Unit $17.77 $39.97 $47.15 $28.96 $34.60 $51.40 $33.32 $193.75' *This rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. Respectfully submitted, Willia~n J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:ED Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~) ~"~ / 7~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALWORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of March, 2005, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 05-114 to order the therein described work in connection with the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 05-114 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired .jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the .Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 05-114, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 are hereby approved. R A N C H O C U C: A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in this district for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 May 18, 2005 Page 2 The Public Works Sub-Committee has reviewed and approved the Engineer's Reports for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 with the recommendation to Council that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for fiscal year 2005~2006. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential Less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres 25.01 acres and Larger $52.00 $26.00 $78.00 $182.00 $364.00 $728.00 $1,300.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:ED Attachment RESOLUTION NO. DS"/~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 16th day of March, 2005, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 05-116 to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No. 05-116 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 2005/2006, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 05-116 be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 are hereby approved. THE C I T Y OF I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA DATE: May 18, 2005 TO: FROM: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lam, AICP, City Manager Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager /"' SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ACCELA,_INCORPORATED FOR $83,034.35 AND TELE-WORKS, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,045.00 FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN INTER-ACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE SYSTEM TO BE FUNDED FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize the execution of a purchase order between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Accela, Inc. in the amount of $83,034.35 for the purchase of an access system (APl) to interact with the Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and the purchase of e-connect software and services, $67,045.00 for a purchase order between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Tele-works, Inc. for Interactive Voice Response (IVR) software and hardware to implement the internet permit and voice response inspection system. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has been successfully utilizing the Accela (previously called Tidemark) computer system to process various types of construction permits in the City. Customers visit City Hall or call an employee on the phone to initiate many permit activities. To continue to enhance its existing operations, streamline existing permit processes, and offer additional public services to customers, City staff has explored the use of the Internet and Voice Response (IVR) systems to meet these needs. After a thorough evaluation process of various options on the market, the City has selected a combination of two systems to meet the defined needs: Accela's e-Connect product, which allows Internet access by citizens and developers, allowing them to schedule building inspections online, check the status of open inspections, as well as initiate permits and check building permit and plan check status. · Tele-Works, Inc. IVR gives citizens the ability to complete transactions and query information over the phone by directly accessing the Tidemark permit database. The combination of these two systems will allow customers not only the ability to walk into City Hall to initiate a transaction but now utilize a computer and/or phone away from City Hall's location to initiate these same high volume, routine transactions such as requesting an inspection. These services can be requested 24 hours per day/seven days per week, thereby increasing the City's ability to mots effectively service its customers. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The Building & Safety Department is requesting development of two key components to enhance both residents' and developers' ability to obtain services from the City, regardless of the City's open hours. 1. Inspection Schedulin,cI - The City desires Internet and/or telephone access to schedule an inspection as well as check the status of the inspection. This option will automate routine requests for scheduling inspections and inquiring on results. It will also provide real-time access for Inspectors to enter inspection results and reschedule inspections from the field without waiting for entering the information at the end of the day in the office. This will be accomplished through wireless cell phones. 2. Permit Processinlq - The City desires Internet and/or phone access to the Tidemark's permit software and database for the initiation of various types of "no plan" permits as well as checking the status on the disposition of the permits. "No Plan" permits can be processed on line and the applicants will not need to be at the permit counter in the City Hall. No plan permits include the following: a. Re-roof not requiring structural upgrade of roof framing b. Water distribution rs-pipe (residential only) c. Water heater replacement d. Plumbing fixture replacement (dishwasher, sink, etc.) e. Gas meter reset (test) f..Adding or moving electrical outlets g. Electrical meter reset h. Electrical panel upgrade (residential only) i. Temporary power pole j. Replacement of heating or air-conditioning unit -2- The advantages of utilizing Accela (Tidemark) and Tele-Works technology for this project are as follows: · Expands upon software products already owned by the City · The two systems will be implemented in concert with each other, allowing both Internet and phone access. The value to the City, of implementing the Accela and Tele-Works technology to meet the defined needs are as follows: · Improved customer service o Customers will have more access to up-to-date permit and inspection information, initiate and obtain simple permits and inspection services without having to come to the City Halt. · Improved employee productivity o Only 5% of inspection requests are done in person. The remainder are done over the phone or fax (approximately 1,800 calls per month). o 4-6 hours per day is spent by clerical staff in checking messages, responding to calls and inputting data to system - approximately 120 hours per month. o Staff will be able to focus On customers who come to permit counter for more complicated projects and permit process. IMPLEMENTATION It is the goal of the Building & Safety Department to implement these products in a phased approach: Phase 1 - Implement both Accela and Tele-works functionality for Inspection Handling Phase 2 - Implement both Accela and Tele-works functionality for Permit processing AEF Systems Consulting, Inc. (AEF) will be contracted with to manage the implementation of the two products and provide coordination of the two vendors with City staff. Once the contracts with both vendors have been executed, AEF will work in conjunction with the vendors to develop a detailed implementation plan that incorporates comprehensive staff training. It is estimated that successful implementation of all functionality will be completed within 6 months. PROJECT COST AND BUDGET ANALYSIS: The project cost is shown on the next page. The budget for this project has been approved through the IT-PAR process. Funding for this project will be provided by the Community Development Technical Services Fund and has been included in the FY 2004/05 Amended Budget which is being submitted for Council approval on May 18, 2005. -3- PROJECT COSTS: The project costs have been estimated as follows: Tele-works Components: IVR Software License eVision Platform Subtotal - Software (Account Number 1016301-5152) $ 8,000.00 $ 7,545.00 $ 15,545.00 Installation and Training for server $ 2,000.00 Inspection Application Development Costs Web interface and results posting from field Installation and Training for application Subtotal - Contract Services (Account Number 1016301-5300) Voice Ports (16) Fax Ports (2) TTY/TDD Port (1) Subtotal - Computer Equipment (Account Number 1016301-5605) Total Tele-Works Costs Accela Components Advantage eConnect plus Sales tax Subtotal - Software (Account Number 1016301-5152) APl from Tidemark needed by Tele-works to access Tidemark database 20,000.00 0,000.00 500.00 32,500.00 16,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 19,000.00 67,045.00 $ 45,944.6O $ 45,944.60 $ 9,589.75 Implementation Services plus travel costs Subtotal - Contract Services (Account Number 1016301-5300) Total Accela eConnect Costs Other Equipment Components Cell phones (15 @ $150 each) (Account Number 1016301-5200) 2 servers for eConnect (Account Number 1016301-5605) Total Other Equipment Costs $ 27,500.00 $ 37,089.75 $ 83,034.35 $ 2,250.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 32,250.00 Other Items Marketing of new program to the public (Account Number 1016301- 5300) Project Management- AEF (Account Number 1016301-5300) Total Other Items $ 670.00 $ 19,900.00 $ 20,570.00 Total One-time Costs $ 202,899.35 -4- 992 TO 1997 SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS 1998 to 2001 SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS 2002 f.o 2004 SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS 2005 PROPOSED SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS FROM 992 TO 2005 - First utdlzed in t999 - Now used each. ear Asphalt ag~m e~atu mixture 1999 TO 2001 OVERLAY PROJECTS 2002 TO 2004 OVERLAY PROJECTS 2005 OVERLAY PROJECTS PAVEMENT REHAB FROM 1992 TO 2005 (OVERLAY AND SLURRY) T H E C I T Y O F I~ANCH 0 CLICAH ONCA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner UPDATE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE WEST SIDE OF KLUSMAN AVENUE, NORTH OF DIAMOND AVENUE - Development Review DRC2003-00015 - Carney RECOMMENDATION: Review the information in the attached Staff Report. BACKGROUND: On May 4, 2005, the City Council continued this item to the May 18, 2005 meeting to give the council members the opportunity to visit the site and examine the homes under construction and the relationship of the houses to the neighboring properties. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:VP:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - City Council Staff Report dated May 4, 2005 THE C I T ¥ 0 F DAN Cfi 0 C II CA M 0 NGA Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 4, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner UPDATE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE WEST SIDE OF KLUSMAN AVENUE, NORTH OF DIAMOND AVENUE - Development Review DRC2003-00015 - Carney RECOMMENDATION: Review the information in this Staff Report and take no further action. BACKGROUND: At a public hearing held on November 5, 2003, and November 19, 2003, the City Council heard an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve Development Review DRC2003-00015, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16038, and Variance DRC2003-00017 (for lot depth) for a four lot single-family residential development. After consideration of the testimony and review of the case, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision on a 3-to-2 vote. The project subsequently proceeded through the plan check process and the permits were issued for construction in compliance with the conditions set in the several City Council Resolutions. It should be noted that the developer building this project is different from the developer who secured the planning entitlements. The previous project applicant did offer to the homeowners to the west that he would be willing to remove the second story windows from the west elevations. ANALYSIS: While under construction, the City Planner responded to concerns voiced by neighbors that the project was not being built according to the conditions set by the City Council. The City Pl~her reviewed the case file and the City Council Resolutions'and minutes and viewed the videotape for the November 2003 hearing to better determine the requirements for this project. The City Planner concluded from this review that the project was in compliance with the City Council decision. As a matter of responding to the neighbors and finding an appropriate conclusion, the City Planner met with the neighbors and the developer, separately and together, several times subsequent to reviewing the case information. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUBTT16038/DRC2003-00015 - CARNEY May 4, 2005 Page 2 The cdtical issue of concern was the visibility from the new homes into the property of the neighbors to the west. The condition set was: "The second floor windows on the west elevation shall be deleted or changed to non-vision glass." The developer opted to provide non-vision glass - the sort that creates a "fuzzy" obscuring view through which light without detail passes. The neighbor contended that nomvision glass was not sufficient to remove the visibility, as the windows on the west elevation were large and able to be opened. The neighbor wanted the windows removed completely, leaving the entire second floor of the west elevation blank. On February 15, 2005, in conference with the neighbors, the developer, and the Senior Building Inspection Supervisor, the City Planner worked out a compromise that retained the architectural design integrity and resulted in the shrinking of the bedroom windows to 2 feet by 2 feet, raising the sill height to 5 feet 9 inches. This solution was subsequently plan checked and approved. In addition, as a response to a verbal comment at the November 19, 2003, City Council hearing, the developer was requested to provide enhanced landscaping in the rear yards to assist in reducing visibility. The developer provided a revised landscape plan that incorporates an additional nine trees along the rear property line wall. Throughout this time, staff understands that the neighbors also met with members of the City Council to voice their concerns. Staff has made the drawings for the project available for review throughout this time. CONCLUSION: Review of this case has been careful and thorough. Except for the lot depth, the project is being developed within the same development standards as the surrounding neighborhood. The developer has responded beyond the original project approval in a way that improves the project significantly and materially solves the concerns of the neighbor. City Planner BB:VP:gs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations Exhibit "C" - City Council Resolution ~ mC)* Rear ~LT ELL'V. ; PUre , (.) ~, ................... KLUSMAN AVENUE ~- t/ 'q SITE PLAN RESOLUTION NO. 03- CITY COUNCIL DRC2003-00015 November 19, 2003 Page 3 a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California. Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, lurther, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, ail significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project whioh are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of T'rtle 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Councti finds as follows.' In considering th e record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Se~on 753,5(~-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission. and approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: PlanninR Division 1) The project shall be developed consistent with the altemalive Site Plan layout based upon a reduced radius turnaround as shown on the attached Exhibit 'A.' 2) This approval is granted contingent upon the approval of Variance footprint in order to meet the 20-foot rear yard setback, while- .... maintaining the 32-foot min.imum front setback.- 5) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00419 is hereby approved subject to rePlacement planting as required by Envirqnmentai Mitigation Measures contained herein. Enoineedn~ Division kqusman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Local Residential' standards including, but not limited to, the following: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03- ~-~ I DRC2003-00015 November 19, 2003 Page 4 a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, sheet trees, and asphalt pavement, as required. b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required per City Street Ughting Standard. Provide traffic stdping and signage, as required. d) Stop permanent improvements north of the southerly ddve approach on Lot 3 and provide interim asphalt pavement to sewe Lot 4 and the northerly driveway on Lot 3. The developer shall deposit cash in-lieu of construction, with the City for frontage improvements on Lot 4 and the north half of Lot 3 prior to final map approval. The deposit shall include removal costs for interim improvements. 3) Diamond Street frontage improvements are to be in accordance with "Local Residential' standards including, but not limited to, the following: a) Protect existing curb and gutter, and sidewalk, or repair as required. Protect existing traffic striping and signage, or replace as required. c) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required per City Street Ughting Standard. 4) Final Pare. el Map 16038 shall be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Environmental Miti,qation Air Quality All constructior~ equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construc~n equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufactureR' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any g rading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their uae was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, as well as City Planning staff. TH E CITY O F I~ANCH 0 CUCAHONGA TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III V~ May 12, 2005 Delayed Agenda Item re: Animal Shelter Issues The staff report for the following Council Business agenda item was not completed when the agenda needed to be printed: 3. The consideration of termination of contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal Care and Control Services and Animal Shelter Services and Discussion of Alternative Service Providers. We are waiting for additional information from No-Kill consultant Nathan Winograd to complete the staff report. Staff will deliver this staff report to you on Monday. cc: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager Adams, Debbie Page 1 of 1 From: Griffin, Shirr'l Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:55 PM To: Kendrena, Donna; Thomas, Kimbedy; Easter, Para; Daniels, Linda; Buller, Brad; Temple, Larry; Layne, Tamara; O'Neil, Joe; Blevins, Dave; Huynh, Trang; McArdle, Kevin; Bryan, Peter; Ortiz, Pedro; Clark, Deborah; 'JMarkman@rwglaw.com' Cc: Dawson, Michelle; Adams, Debbie; Scott, Kathy Subject: City Council Staff Report~_l~[~y l~th, Item I. 3. Attached Consideration of terminatl~f--c~ntracts with the County of San Bernardino for animal care and control services and animal shelter services and discussion of options for alternative service providers. Please add to the May 18th Agenda packet. Please contact the City Clerk's Office if you have any questions. Thank you. Shirr'l Griffin 5/17/2005 T H E C I 3' ¥ 0 F I~ANCtlO CIJCAHONGA II S Repo DA'rE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES (CO 96-047) AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES (CO 96-048) AND DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS Background At the May 4, 2005 meeting of the City Council, the Council discussed the animal control and shelter services currently provided to the City through contractual agreements with the County of San Bernardino. At that time, some members of the Council expressed a desire to make a motion to terminate the contracts with the County for the provision of these services. Per the advice of the City Attorney, no such motion was made since the item under discussion had not been agendized as a consideration to terminate the contracts. Therefore, the Council approved a motion to place an item on the May 18 Council agenda to consider the following items: Direct staff to request from consultant Nathan Winograd the cost and timeframe to expand the scope of services for his previous proposal to include the development of a Transition Plan to move from a County-operated to a City-operated Shelter; Direct staff to provide to the City Council information regarding the time frame for transitioning to a City-operated animal care, control and Shelter program as well as providing notice to the County of the intent to terminate the existing contract(s); 3, Consider the termination of the contracts with the County for animal control and shelter services. These items are more thoroughly discussed below: 1. Direct Staff to request from consultant Nathan Wino.qrad the cost and timeframe tn expand the scope of services for his previous proposal to include the development of a .'l'ranston Plan to move from a County-operated to City-operated Shelter. In March Uay 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardlno for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 2 of 5 2005, City staff prepared a Scope of Work detailing the specific expectations and products we desired in seeking consultation services for the No-Kill Shelter study. Per the direct[on of the City Council at the May 4, 2005 meeting to ask Nathan Winograd to expand his proposal to include a transition plan for the City, staff modified that Scope of Work and forwarded it to Mr. Winograd. We asked that Mr. Winograd, in addition to performing the No-Kill study, prepare a Transition Plan that would include the following: · Develop recommendations for defining the level of services for a municipally operated No-Kill Animal Shelter as well as identify required staffing levels and assist or provide advice in the development of job descriptions. · Develop a Transition Plan from the County-operated to City-operated programs that identifies the elements and time frames for implementation. · Identify the costs for transition and implementation, including service levels, staffing, equipment acquisition, systems, any necessary facility modifications, insurance and outside support services that will be necessary for the City to operate an animal, control, and Shelter program. · Develop the necessary policies, protocols, and procedures that need to be in place in order for the City to effectively operate the Animal Shelter and animal control program. Mr. Wlnograd's proposal for the initial No-Kill study was $12,000 plus expenses up to $2,000. He was unable to provide the City with a new proposal with this new scope of work as of the date of this memorandum. Therefore, at this time wa do not have a cost estimate or time frame for the preparation of a Transition Plan by Mr. Winograd. 2. Time frame for transitioninq to a City-operated animal care, control and Shelter proqram and providin.q notice to the County of the intent to terminate the existinq contract(s}. The transition to a City-operated program is complex and includes numerous elements to be considered and decisions to be made. Desired levels of service must be identified. These would include levels of veterinary care, programs and services that should be offered at the Shelter, the required staffing levels to provide these programs and services, the question of the Council's interest in employing animal license checkers to canvass the City enforcing license laws, and what equipment/vehicles would be required. Also, after identifying the positions needed, job descriptions, recruitments, and training would be required. Protocols, policies, and procedures must be developed, as well as a means for dispatching animal control calls 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Other considerations that need to be addressed include insurance coverages, the revision and/or adoption of animal control ordinances, and record keeping systems that are required by State law. An additional requirement will be the negotiation of revenues with the County and the consideration of how to restructure budgets. May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 3 of 5 It is critical that any transition have a rational and orderly plan of implementation. If the Council makes the commitment to operate the Shelter as a municipal-operated program, it must be organized properly so that the services meet the community's expectations. Ideally, the transition process would include the following steps: · Council gives notice to the County of the intent to terminate the contract(s) by a certain date. Ideally, that date will correspond with the completion of a well- defined orderly transition pedod. · Contract with Nathan Winograd to prepare a Transition Plan. · Council evaluates and approves all or part of the Transition Plan. · Council considers and establishes budgets for ,Shelter and animal control programs. · Authorize staff to commence implementation of the Transition Plan. · Negotiate the elements of the Transition Plan that require County cooperation, such as negotiating transfers of revenues. · Council allocates transfer of funds from reserves for transition and start up costs. · Begin provision of services at identified target date. The City would incur expenses during the transition period. The extent of these costs would be determined by the manner tn which the transition is achieved. The following examples illustrate different scenarios and options for the transition: · The City may, with the County's cooperation, phase in the transition by hiring a Manager/Director initially and then adding new employees In phases to allow time for the staff to be trained. In this scenario, the acquisition of equipment and materials could also be phased. The effectiveness of this phase in would depend upon the ability of the County to accommodate such a phase in. · The City may hire a Manager/Director and propose hiring current Shelter staff members as City employees and purchasing the existing equipment from the County. This would, of course, depend upon the willingness of County staff to become employees of the City. Additionally, some new equipment would need to be purchased depending on the compatibility of such items as computers, etc. with City equipment, as well as items that may have been shared among County- wide staff previously, such as vehicles. · The City may retain the services of a contractor to temporarily staff and operate the Shelter and provide animal control services during a transition period in which the City would staff up, set up systems, train and take over operations as of a certain date. Staff is only aware of one such provider in this area that would be able to provide these services. May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-~48) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 4 of 5 The costs for the above transition scenarios are unknown, however staff estimates that "start up" costs for equipment and materials such as vehicles {four trucks), computer hardware and software, etc. could be several hundred thousand dollars. In addition, there would be substantial costs for transitional staffing. Per our existing contracts, the County currently provides the equivalent of over 13 full time employees for Animal Shelter and animal control services. Specific costs will vary depending upon the factors of the transition and negotiations with the County. In order to achieve a full transition to City-run operations, the City would need to develop the Transition Plan, have the Council approve the Plan, approve a budget modification, commence implementation of the Plan, and then fully sever the County's involvement. It must be noted that two processes must take place concurrently: the City must transition to take over the operations of these programs and the County must develop a plan to withdraw from providing the services in a manner that will not result in County employees losing their jobs. Consultant Nathan Winograd has advised the City that "nine months to one year would be optimal" for the transition process. Staff agrees with this assessment, provided the transition does not run into any complications along the way. 3. Consider the termination of the contracts with the County for animal control and shelter service. The City has two separate contracts with the County for animal care and control services: one contract for animal control and one for the staffing and operation of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. In addition to the contract amounts listed below, the County retains all revenues collected such as licensing and adoption fees. Both of these contracts are automatically extended, unless they are terminated or modified: · Animal Control (field services): The City has contracted with the County for animal control services since 1983 and the contract amount of $62,700 has remained unchanged since that time. The City or the County may terminate this contract without cause at any time with a minimum written notice of 60 days. · Animal Shelter: The City has contracted with the County for Animal Shelter services since 1998 and the current contract amount is for $305,600 per year. The City or the County may terminate this contract without cause at any time with a minimum written notlca of 30 days. There are different options to consider with regard to terminating one or both of these contracts. Each of the following options has significant implications or consequences: · Terminate the contracts immediately by giving the County 30 days written notice of the termination of the Shelter contract and 60 days written notice of the termination of the animal control contract. The City has no structure in @~ace to immediately take over these operations and would need to contract with another provider to provide temporary staffing and operations for animal control and May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardlno for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047} and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 5 of 5 Shelter services, or cease operations until the City is ready to commence municipal services. · Give the County written notification of the termination of the contract(s) with an effective date of a certain number of months following the date of notification. The City would need to negotiate with the County on a phased approach to achieve a transition that meets the needs of both agencies. Should the City Council decide to terminate both of these contracts, they may consider phasing the terminations/transitions of the separate functions of Shelter services and animal control. For example, the Council may consider terminating the Shelter services contract with one effective date and terminating the animal control contract with a later effective date. This would allow City staff an opportunity to focus efforts on implementing effective Shelter operations before Implementing the animal control function imhouse. Following the City Council's review of this information, City staff will need to meet Immediately with the County to discuss any decisions approved by the City Council. It should be acknowledged that the County understandably might not be able to comply with the City's decisions regarding time frames for a transition. In many ways the County may dictate what choices the City has based upon their need to withdraw from the program in a timeframe suitable to their program, organizational, and budgetary needs. Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Anaryst II1 T H E C I T Y 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 18, 2005 Mayor and Members'of the City Council Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES (CO 96-047) AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES (CO 96-048) AND DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS BackRround At the May 4, 2005 meeting of the City Council, the Council discussed the animal control and shelter services currently provided to the City through contractual agreements with the County of San Bernardino. At that time, some members of the Council expressed a desire to make a motion to terminate the contracts with the County for the provision of these services. Per the advice of the City Attorney, no such motion was made since the item under discussion had not been agendized as a consideration to terminate the contracts. Therefore, the Council approved a motion to place an item on the May 18 Council agenda to consider the following items: Direct staff to request from consultant Nathan Winograd the cost and timeframe to expand the scope of services for his previous proposal to include the development of a Transition Plan to move from a County-operated to a City-operated Shelter; Direct staff to provide to the City Council information regarding the time frame for transitioning to a City-operated animal care, control and Shelter program as well as providing notice to the County of the intent to terminate the existing contract(s); 3. Consider the termination of the contracts with the County for animal control and shelter services. These items are more thoroughly discussed below: 1. Direct staff to request from consultant Nathan Winoqrad the cost and timeframe to expand the scope of services for his previous proposal to include the development of a Transition Plan to move from a County-operated to City-operated Shelter. In March May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 2 of 5 2005, City staff prepared a Scope of Work detailing the specific expectations and products we desired in seeking consultation services for the No-Kill Shelter study. Per the direction of the City Council at the May 4, 2005 meeting to ask Nathan Winograd to expand his proposal to include a transition plan for the City, staff modified that Scope of Work and forwarded it to Mr. Winograd. We asked that Mr. Winograd, in addition to performing the No-Kill study, prepare a Transition Plan that would include the following: · Develop recommendations for defining the level of services for a municipally operated No-Kill Animal Shelter as well as identify required staffing levels and assist or provide advice in the development of job descriptions. · Develop a Transition Plan from the County-operated to City-operated programs that identifies the elements and time frames for implementation. · Identify the costs for transition and implementation, including service levels, staffing, equipment acquisition, systems, any necessary facility modifications, insurance and outside support services that will be necessary for the City to operate an animal, control, and Shelter program. · Develop the necessary policies, protocols, and procedures that need to be in place in order for the City to effectively operate the Animal Shelter and animal control program. Mr. Winograd's proposal for the initial No-Kill study was $12,000 plus expenses up to $2,000. He was unable to provide the City with a new proposal with this new scope of work as of the date of this memorandum. Therefore, at this time we do not have a cost estimate or time frame for the preparation of a Transition Plan by Mr. Winograd. 2. Time frame for transitioning to a City-operated animal care, control and Shelter proqram and providin.q notice to the County of the intent to terminate the existinq contract(s). The transition to a City-operated program is complex and includes numerous elements to be considered and decisions to be made. Desired levels of service must be identified. These would include levels of veterinary care, programs and services that should be offered at the Shelter, the required staffing levels to provide these programs and services, the question of the Council's interest in employing animal license checkers to canvass the City enforcing license laws, and what equipmentJvehicles would be required. Also, after identifying the positions needed, job descriptions, recruitments, and training would be required. Protocols, policies, and procedures must be developed, as well as a means for dispatching animal control calls 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Other considerations that need to be addressed include insurance coverages, the revision and/or adoption of animal control ordinances, and record keeping systems that are required by State law. An additional requirement will be the negotiation of revenues with the County and the consideration of how to restructure budgets. May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 3 of 5 It is critical that any transition have a rational and ordedy plan of implementation. If the Council makes the commitment to operate the Shelter as a municipal-operated program, it must be organized propedy so that the services meet the community's expectations. Ideally, the transition process would include the following steps: · Council gives notice to the County of the intent to terminate the contract(s) by a certain date. Ideally, that date will correspond with the completion of a well- defined ordedy transition period. · Contract with Nathan Winograd to prepare a Transition Plan. · Council evaluates and approves all or part of the Transition Plan. · Council considers and establishes budgets for Shelter and animal control programs. · Authorize staff to commence implementation of the Transition Plan. · Negotiate the elements of the Transition Plan that require County cooperation, such as negotiating transfers of revenues. · Council allocates transfer of funds from reserves for transition and start up costs. · Begin provision of services at identified target date. The City would incur expenses during the transition period. The extent of these costs would be determined by the manner in which the transition is achieved. The following examples illustrate different scenarios and options for the transition: · The City may, with the County's cooperation, phase in the transition by hiring a Manager/Director initially and then adding new employees in phases to allow time for the staff to be trained. In this scenario, the acquisition of equipment and materials could also be phased. The effectiveness of this phase in would depend upon the ability of the County to accommodate such a phase in. · The City may hire a ManageflDiractor and propose hiring current Shelter staff members as City employees and purchasing the existing equipment from the County. This would, of course, depend upon the willingness of County staff to become employees of the City. Additionally, some new equipment would need to be purchased depending on the compatibility of such items as computers, etc. with City equipment, as well as items that may have been shared among County- wide staff previously, such as vehicles. · The City may retain the services of a contractor to temporarily staff and operate the Shelter and provide animal control services during a transition period in which the City would staff up, set up systems, train and take over operations as of a certain date. Staff is only aware of one such provider in this area that would be able to provide these services. May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services {CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 4 of 5 The costs for the above transition scenarios are unknown, however staff estimates that "start up" costs for equipment and materials such as vehicles (four trucks), computer hardware and software, etc. could be several hundred thousand dollars. In addition, there would be substantial costs for transitional staffing. Per our existing contracts, the County currently provides the equivalent of over 13 full time employees for Animal Shelter and animal control services. Specific costs will vary depending upon the factors of the transition and negotiations with the County. In order to achieve a full transition to City-run operations, the City would need to develop the Transition Plan, have the Council approve the Plan, approve a budget modification, commence implementation of the Plan, and then fully sever the County's involvement. It must be noted that two processes must take place concurrently: the City must transition to take over the operations of these programs and the County must develop a plan to withdraw from providing the services in a manner that will not result in County employees losing their jobs. Consultant Nathan Winograd has advised the City that "nine months to one year would be optimal" for the transition process. Staff agrees with this assessment, provided the transition does not run into any complications along the way. 3. Consider the termination of the contracts with the County for animal control and shelter service. The City has two separate contracts with the County for animal care and control services: one contract for animal control and one for the staffing and operation of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. In addition to the contract amounts listed below, the County retains all revenues collected such as licensing and adoption fees. Both of these contracts are automatically extended, unless they are terminated or modified: · Animal Control (field services): The City has contracted with the County for animal control services since 1983 and the contract amount of $62,700 has remained unchanged since that time. The City or the County may terminate this contract without cause at any time with a minimum written notice of 60 days. · Animal Shelter: The City has contracted with the County for Animal Shelter services since 1996 and the current contract amount is for $305,600 per year. The City or the County may terminate this contract without cause at any time with a minimum written notice of 30 days. There are different options to consider with regard to terminating one or both of these contracts. Each of the following options has significant implications or consequences: · Terminate the contracts immediately by giving the County 30 days written notice of the termination of the Shelter contract and 60 days written notice of the termination of the animal control contract. The City has no structure in place to immediately take over these operations and would need to contract with another provider to provide temporary staffing and operations for animal control and May 18, 2005 Staff Report: Consideration of Termination of Contracts with the County of San Bernardino for Animal care and Control Services (CO 96-047) and Animal Shelter Services (CO 96-048) and Discussion of Alternate Service Providers Page 5 of 5 Shelter services, or cease operations until the City is ready to commence municipal services. · Give the County written notification of the termination of the contract(s) with an effective date of a certain number of months following the date of notification. The City would need to negotiate with the County on a phased approach to achieve a transition that meets the needs of both agencies. Should the City Council decide to terminate both of these contracts, they may consider phasing the terminations/transitions of the separate functions of Shelter services and animal control. For example, the Council may consider terminating the Shelter services contract with one effective date and terminating the animal control contract with a later effective date. This would allow City staff an opportunity to focus efforts on implementing effective Shelter operations before implementing the animal control function in-house. Following the City Council's review of this information, City staff will need to meet immediately with the County to discuss any decisions approved by the City Council. It should be acknowledged that the County understandably might not be able to comply with the City's decisions regarding time frames for a transition. In many ways the County may dictate what choices the City has based upon their need to withdraw from the program in a timeframe suitable to their program, organizational, and budgetary needs. Respectfully Submitted, Michelle Dawson Management Analyst III