Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-39 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 79-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE APPROVAL NO. 79-10 LOCATED AT 9900 ARROW ROUTE IN THE R-3 ZONE. WHEREAS, on March 27, 1979, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape. 2. That the site has adequate access. 3. That the proposed use will have no- adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 5. That the conditions listed in this report are necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on April 25, 1979. SECTION 3: That Site Approval No. 79-10 is approved subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall contact the Planning Division for compliance with the following conditions: 1. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' and directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. Ail two-way widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 5. Ail landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the M~ster Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 8. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 9. Ail roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and Building Official. 10. The main sanctuary shall be limited to 344 seats. If additional seating is desired, then a revised plan must be submitted to the Planning Division showing additional parking. 11. The City reserves the right to require the owners of this site to grant a reciprocal access easement to the west property for shared access in the event it is needed to meet the City's'access policy. Applicant shall contact the Building Division for compliance with the following conditions: 12. The applicant shall comply 'with the latest adopted'Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. 13. The approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Grading Ordinance and to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Applicant shall contact the Engineering Division for compliance with the following conditions: 15. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of- way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 16. ~proved street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of encroachment pe~it. 17. Ail street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 18. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the p~lic improvements, prior to issuance of building pe~its. 19. Construct the following missing improvements on the - following streets: Arrow Route - curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approach, street trees, and street lights. 20. Pavement striping and marking plan shall be required. 21. ~ approved grading plan and soils report in accordance with the City grading standards will be required. 22. ~1 proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground. 23. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the appropriate utility companies and the City Engineer. 24. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. ~plicant shall contact the Foothill Fire District and the Cucamonga County Water District for compliance with the following conditions: 25. Water supply and sanitary sewer facilities shall be provided to the specifications of the Cucamonga County Water District and the City Engineer with all incidental fees paid by the developer. 26. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. 27. Emergency access shall be provided and maintained free and clear at a minimum of 24 feet at all times during construction to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. ~PRO~D MD ~OPTED HIS 25~ DAY OF ~RIL, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THECI~O~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:~~Re,~~/~/'~a~n~__~-// Sec~tary of the Planning Co~ission ~/ I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April, 1979, by the following vote to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JONES