Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/06/15 - Agenda Packet I= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Redevelopment Agency · Fire Protection District · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS '1st and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. JUNE 15, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Guflerrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting .. Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............ Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ..~RANcHO ~...~UCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages frae expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spakesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at '10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, cLrancho-cucamonga, ca. us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. .~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 1 [~NCHO HALL, 10500 C~VIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER I 1. Roll Call: Alexander I, Gutierrez __, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ] 1. Acceptance of Inland Empire Section APA (American Planning Association) Award for Outstanding Planning Project - Victoria Gardens. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR I The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: May 18, 2005 June 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 (Special Meeting) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 and 1 Payroll 5.25.2005 through 6/7/2005, for the total amount of $2,699,860.68. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 25 2005. 4. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services 31 Update. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 2 RANCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE 5. Approval for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM Notebooks, 43 Thinkcenter CPU's, Monitors, Imagine, Warehousing, and Deployment services to the lowest responsible bidder, Insight Public Sector, in the amount of $371,676, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001209-5200 (MIS Maintenance and Operations) for monitors in the amount of $65,558, Acct. No. 1001209-5300 (MIS Contract Services) for warranties in the amount of $61,100 and Acct. No. 1001209-5605 (MIS Capital Outlay Computer Hardware) for desktop and notebook computers in the amount not to exceed $245,018, for the Citywide Downstream Upgrade and Replacement Program. 6. Approval for the single source purchase of Motorola radios and 45 accessories from Comserco Communications, of Riverside, in the amount of $53,715.00, funded from Acct. No. 1382105-5603 (COPS/Dreier EOC Grant - Capital Outlay-Equipment), and authorization to transfer $1,161.00 from Acct. No. 1382105-5152 (Computer Software) and $21,649.00 from Acct. No. 1382105-5300 (Contract Services) to Acct. No. 1382105-5603. 7. Approval of Amendment to the CDBG Budget for Fiscal Year 2004/05 by appropriating $18,736.35 to Acct. No. 1204304-5650-1342204 for 47 improvements to the Norton Fisher House and $16,500.00 to Acct. No. 1204314-5650-1230204 for the Home improvement Program; and appropriating $35,236.35 into grant revenue Acct. No. 1204000-4740. 8. Approval to establish an "Integrated Waste Management Fund" (Fund 188) to account for revenues and expenditures associated with the 48 collection of AB939 recycling fees; authorization to transfer AB939 fund balance of $1,665,071 and estimated current year net AB939 revenues of $246,170 (total of $1,911,241 ) from the General Fund to the Integrated Waste Management Fund; and authorization to transfer appropriations in the amount of $1,911,241 into Acct. No. 1188000- 8001 and $1,911,241 into Acct. No. 1001001-9188. 9. Approval of a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes for a 50 waiver of rental fees associated with a Family Fun Fest to be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter on July 6, 2005. 10. Approval of a request by Alta Loma and Citrus Little Leagues and District 21 for a light variance requested for Major (11-12) Division All- 53 Star Tournament hosted by Alta Loma and Citrus Little League on July 5 - July 20, 2005, at Heritage Park and Red Hill Park. 11. Approval of Amendment to the City's Salary Resolution No. 04-313 to 58 include Animal Services Director Classification. 12. Approval of a Resolution to supercede Resolution No. 85-130 which will amend the list of officers who are authorized to participate in the 59 Local Agency Investment Fund for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1S, 2005 - 7.'00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY [~RANcHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA I RESOLUTION NO. 05-85-130A 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LiST OF OFFICERS WHO ARE AUTHORIZED TO ORDER THE DEPOSIT OF WITHDRAWAL OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY iNVESTMENT FUND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 13. Approval to execute an Addendum to the Software License and 62 Support Agreement between SunGard Bi-Tech, Inc., and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the total amount of $87,378 ($32,250 for software license fees funded out of Acct. No. 1001209-5152; $5,328 for first year support and $49,800 for professional services funded out of Acct. No. 1001-209-5300); and authorization to purchase three (3) IBM X Series 336 Servers from IBM Corporation in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to support the software upgrade (funded out of Acct. No. 1001209-5605). 14. Approval to increase the contract amount for gasoline and diesel fuel 64 for Fleet Maintenance and the Police Department from Poma Distributing Company, Inc., of San Bernardino, in an annual amount not to exceed $270,000, funded from Acct Nos. 1001317-5255 and 1001317-5256 and an annual amount not to exceed $210,000, funded from Acct. No. 1001701-5255, as approved in the FY 04/05 amended budget. 15. Approval of release of a deposit and payment in the amount of 65 $179,724.09 to Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, for a developer deposit associated with the formation of Landscape Maintenance District 10 and approval of an appropriation of $179,724.09 to Acct. No. 1140- 303-5650/1026140-0, to be funded from LMD No. 10 (Fund 140) fund balance. 16. Approval to reject all bids received for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route as non-responsive to 67 the needs of the City, and approval to authorize the re-advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1180- 303-5650/1472180-0 and 1208~303-5650/1472208-0. RESOLUTION NO. 05-194 72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RE- ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR THE "GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE"  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY ,..~RANc O HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~UCAMONG^ 17. Approval for award and execution of Professional Services Agreement 77 in the amount of $79,760.00 to AKM Consulting Engineers (CO 05- 056), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,976.00 for the update of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Master Plan and Fees Update, to be funded from Fund 001 -General Fund, Acct. No. 1001305-5300. 18. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $37,352.50 to the apparent 80 Iow bidder, Athletic Field Specialists, Inc. (CO 05-057), for the base bid and additive bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,735.25 for the "Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park" project, to be funded from Park Development funds, Acct. No. 1120305- 5650/1222120-0. 19. Approval of an agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Foothill Crossing, LLC 84 (CO 05-058), authorize the expenditure of funds for the purchase price and appropriate $6,532,579.50 (purchase price) to Acct. No. 2660801-5650/1360660-6312 from the 2004 TAB Bond proceeds. 20. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 86 execution of the contract in the amount of $1,084,270.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, H & H General Contractors, Inc. (CO 05-059), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $108,427.90 for the "Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue" project, to be funded from General Engineering Project Management funds, Acct. Ne. 1001307-5650/1506001-0, and appropriate an additional amount of $200,000.00 to Acct. No. 1001307-5650/1506001-0 from General Engineering Project Management fund balance. 21. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus (CO FD 92 05-050) in the amount of $25,000 to perform a comprehensive review of Fire District fees, to be funded from Acct. No. 1016301-5300. 22. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $174,945.00 to the 117 apparent Iow bidder, Roadway Engineering, Inc. (CO 05-061), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,494.50 for The Northeast Corner ef Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Avenue Curb Return project, to be funded from Transportation funds, Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1466124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $16,000.00 to Acct. No. 1124303- 5650/1466124-0 from Transportation fund balance. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5 C[~d'4CHO HALL, 10500 C~VlC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONG^ 23. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the 121 execution of a contract in the amount of $38,405.00 the apparent Iow bidder, Sadie Construction, Inc. (CO 05-062), of Atwood, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,840.00 for "Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3" project, from the Capital Reserve Acct. No. 1025001-5300 as approved in the FY 04/05 budget. 24. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for 123 improvements for DRC2001-00572, located at 9649 Foothill Boulevard on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by McDonald's Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-195 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00572 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2003-00732, 125 located on the north and south sides of Jack Benny Drive, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Bates-Evergreen Partners, LLC & Stadium Plaza South, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-196 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003- 00732 26. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRCDR00-79, 129 located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-197 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRCDR00- 79 27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for the perimeter improvements 133 for Tract 15814, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues, submitted by Fieldstone Communities, Inc. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ,.~¢NCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE __{~.~ UCAMONOA RESOLUTION NO. 05-198 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRACT PERIMETER IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOP, THE WORK 28. Approval to accept the Phase lB of Community Facilities District 135 2001-01, Contract No. 03-073 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $10,488,241.41. RESOLUTION NO. 05-199 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-073 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 139 and Labor and Materials Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2. RESOLUTION NO. 05-200 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY cRANcHo HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE I2CAMONGA E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS ORDINANCE NO. 743 (second reading) 141 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS II r. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Ii The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE 143 RELATING TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) RESOLUTION NO. 05-201 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY SUCH DISTRICT, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT AND THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR SUCH DISTRICT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF FOR SUCH DISTRICT .Ra c.o CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 8 CUC~ONG^ HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE RESOLUTION NO. 05-202 170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO AUTHORIZE MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED, THE PATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED AND THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 05-203 173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) ORDINANCE NO. 744 (first reading) 195 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 643 AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) PURSUANT TO AN AMENDED AND RESTATED PATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX Tho following items have no legal publication or posting requirements, lhe Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted.  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 15, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 [,,..~,~&NCHO HALL, 10500 CIWC CENTER DRIVE UGAMONGA H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. APPROVAL OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL 210 STATUS AND REJECTION OF ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II) AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY. 2. UPDATE ON PROGRAMS AT THE CENTRAL PARK JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER AND GOLDY S. LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER (Oral) L COUNCIL BUSINESS ] The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. DISCUSSION ON COST CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO THE TRANSITION FROM A COUNTY TO A CITY OPERATED ANIMAL SHELTER 2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) I, Debra O. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 9, 2005 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 18, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES Il ^. CALL TO ORDER I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, May 18, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. Il B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) James Markman, City Attorney stated it is requested to add an item to the agenda to discuss pending litigation consultation with legal counsel concerning Spirit of the Sage vs. City of Rancho Cucamonga (Etiwanda Creek Case). He stated the agenda had already been posted and a court decision came in after that. It is now necessary to talk to the City Council about this. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Michael to add the above stated item as indicated by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Il C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. [[ D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS The closed session recessed at 6:35 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetin.q A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 18, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:54 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Manager, Michelle Perera, Reference Services Coordinator; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan and EMS Administrator Stephanie Rasmussen, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst Ill; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. II ~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS [ B1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 15-21, 2005, as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week. The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation 1o Fire Chief Peter Bryan and EMS Administrator Stephanie Rasmussen. Chief Bryan and EMS Administrator Rasmussen told about the EMS training they were doing this week. B2. Presentation of Plaques of Appreciation to donors and sponsors of the Rancho Cucamonga Wellness Fair held April 30, 2005, at the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center. The Mayor and City Council, including Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent, and Gina Truman, Recreation Coordinator, assisted with the presentation of the plaques. B3. Presentation of an Award for "Best Walking Cities" by the California Podiatric Medical Association, the American Podiatric Medical Association and Prevention Magazine. Dr. Jan Tepper made the presentation to the City Council. B4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 15-21, 2005, as "Blue Ribbon Week" in recognition of "National Police Week 2005." The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to Captain Pete Ortiz and his staff. B5. Presentation of a ProcLamation declaring May 15-21,2005, as "Public Works Week." City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page ;3 The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to the following: Richard Smiderle, Lead Maintenance Worker, Streets Paul Corona, Mechanic, Fleet Michael Claeys, Maintenance Worker, Facilities Anthony Vasquez, Maintenance Worker, Parks Richard Smidede, Lead Maintenance Worker, stated on May 26, 2005 there will be a trade show at the Epicenter to display the equipment the Maintenance staff uses. B6. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition in appreciation of years of service to: Joyce Womack, Library Board, and Paula Pachon, Library Foundation. The Mayor and City Council, along with Deborah Clark, Library Director, presented the certificates to 3oyce Womack and Paula Pachon and thanked them for their service. II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I Cl. Steve Renteria, Victoria Groves, stated there was an accident near the school in his neighborhood and felt a stop sign should be installed at Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont, which would be across the street from the school. He asked that the City Council consider this and take action. He stated this is a safety issue because a child was lost in this accident and he hoped the Council would do the right thing. C2. John Lyons, Etiwanda, talked about the three-story apartment buildings behind the new Circuit City, which is adjacent to the Victoria Gardens Shopping Center. He felt the gateway into the City should have something better than three-story buildings. He referred to this as "apartment row." C3. Peter Bryan, Fire Chief, asked the public to program their cell phones so they have quicker access when they need emergency police or fire service. He stated the numbers are: 941-1488 for police and 983-5911 for fire. He reminded everyone that when calling from a residence, people can continue calling 911. C4. Nicole Myerchin mentioned the newspaper article today about the animal shelter. She felt the City Council should seriously consider whom they have run the animal shelter so they are not euthanizing animals. II ~,. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Check Register 4/27/05 through 5/10/05 and Payroll 4/27/05 through 5/10/05, for the total amount of $5,240,984.01. D2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2005. D3. Approval of a Public Convenience and Necessity, DRC2005-00360 -Han Maeum Market, for a Type 21 off-sale liquor license for an Asian food store in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue at 9849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit M - APN: 0208-301-16. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 05-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2005-00360 FOR A TYPE 21 OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND AN ASIAN FOOD STORE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE, LOCATED AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT M; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0208-301-16 D4. Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2004/05 appropriations. D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 05/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1176303560/1022176 (Measure "l"), 11703035650/1022170 (Gas Tax) and 12043145650~1527204 (Community Development Block Grant). RESOLUTION NO. 05-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 05/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval to authorize the advedising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 05/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, to be funded from Measure "1", Acct. No. 11763035650/1022176 for construction of said projects. RESOLUTION NO. 05-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 05/06 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D7. Approval to appropriate $15,500 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award Fund balance into Acct. No. 1366702-5603, for the purchase of two (2) Segway People Transporters and related equipment. D8. Approval of Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. D9. Approval to negotiate a contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure, to be funded from Capital Reserve funds, Acct. No. 1025001-5602. D10. Approval of Map located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp submitted by Aim All Storage 210, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16648 City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 5 Dll. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16487, located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street, submitted by Oasis Homes, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16487, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 05-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16487 D12. Approval of Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173 - Amanda Lopez-Castanon, to designate the Buehler House as a Designated Local Landmark, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208- 131-12. Related File: Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179. RESOLUTION NO. 05-162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2005-00173 DESIGNATING THE BUEHLER HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9650 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-131-12 D13. Approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2005-00179 (CO 05-044) with Amanda Lopez-Castanon to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce prbperty tax on the Buehler House, currently applying for Historic Landmark status, located at 9650 San Bernardino Road - APN: 0208-131-12. Related File: Landmark Designation DRC2005-00173. D14. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Mathis & Associates (CO 05-045) to assist the City Council in an evaluation of the City Manager. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN LYONS. D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP95-25, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Sahga Group, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 05-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP95-25 D16. Approval of improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2002-00519, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway northbound on ramp, submitted by Fountainhead Delta, LP. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 05-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00519 D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16512, located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16512 D18. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between La Grand Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Nodhtown Housing Development Corporation. D19. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR00-67, located on the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Ironwood Apartments, LLC. D20. Approval of the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659, located south of Wilson Avenue, east of Hanley Avenue (Bluegrass Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. D21. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-2, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. D22. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-3, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. D23. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond reduced for Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12659-4, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. D24. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16105, located between East Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, south of Base Line Road, submitted by K. Hovnanian Forecast Homes (formerly Rancho Cucamonga Land Co., LLC). D25. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16193, located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Empire Homes II, LLC. D26. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16302, located on the northeast corner of Smokestone Street and Mulberry Street, submitted by APHRC23, LLC. D28. Approval to accept Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, II & III Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for the Landscape Infrastructure Phase I, II & III Improvements for Rancho Etiwanda, located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard North of the 210 Freeway, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA (LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE I, II & Ill) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item D14. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D14. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Mathis & Associates (CO 05-045) to assist the City Council in an evaluation of the City Manager.. John Lyons stated he thought it was strange that the City Attorney was asking for an evaluation of the City Manager. James Markr~an, City Attorney, stated the City Council wanted to get a third party, independent evaluator to do the service of evaluating the City Manager. He stated this is being brought to the City Council per the Council's direction. Mr. Lyons inquired if this would be done annually. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it is not done annually, but this City Council wanted to do an independent evaluation. Councilmember Michael stated Rancho Cucamonga does one of the finest City Managers around, but that this is a process they are going through. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve item D14. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. l[ E. CONSENT ORDINANCES ] El. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIMF LIMIT TO REPAY INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33670 ON ACCOUNT OF THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 ERAF PAYMENT ORDINANCE NO. 742 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(e)(2)(D) Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 742. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 742. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to discuss item 12 at this time. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The minutes will remain in agenda order. Il F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I Fl. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REVISING FEES IN THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVF TRANSPORTATION FEE SCHEDULED APPLICABLE TO CITYWlDE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS TO LEVELS MANDATED BY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MEASURE "1", PASSED BY VOTERS ON NOVEMBER 2, 2004 A staff report and power point, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, were presented by Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I. Councilmember Williams wished there had been adjustments made along the way instead of such a large jump now. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO REVISE CITY-WIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 05-167. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A staff report was presented by Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager, who stated this would be an increase of about $235 per commercial user. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve Resolution No. 05-168. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ITEMS F3, F4 AND F5 WERE CONSIDERED TOGETHER. F3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005~2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. A staff report and power point presentation, which are on file in the City Clerk's office, were given by Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 6, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo to approve Resolution Nos. 05-169, 05-170 and 05-171. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Michael left the room and was absent for the vote). F4. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. SEE DISCUSSION UNDER ITEM F3. RESQLUTION NO. 05-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FE. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006; NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. SEE DISCUSSION UNDER ITEM F3. RESOLUTION NO. 05-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 10 l] G. PUBLIC HEARINGS [ No items submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ACCELA, INCORPORATED (CO 05-046) FOR $83,034.35 AND TELE-WORKS, INCORPORATED (CO 05-047) IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,045.00 FOR THF PURCHASE OF AN INTER-ACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE SOFTVVARE AND HARDWARE SYSTEM, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND A staff report was presented by Trang Huynh, Building Official. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve CO 05-046. Motion carried unanimously H2. UPDATE ON LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, were given by Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I. ACTION: Report received and filed. II ,. COUNCIL"USINESS I I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Coun¢ilmembor.) Councilmember Michael stated he does not see the issue of fire response times as very controversial. He stated the northwest portion of the City has another station planned for that area of the City. He stated the strategic plan is being worked on by the Fire Chief, which will answer some of these questions. He hoped the public will bear with the City while the study is being done. He stated this Saturday is the opening of Central Park. Councilmember Williams wanted to thank the coaches from many of the schools in Rancho Cucamonga for assisting with the Rotary Club's track meet. She felt the teachers of the schools should also be thanked for their work. She stated she went to Sacramento last week to meet with legislators on issues concerning the City. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he wished we had all the answers to the public safety concerns, but knew that the Fire Chief is working hard on the strategic plan. He felt all public safety emp oyees should th be supported. He stated on June 4 , the Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo will be held at the Epicenter, which will educate the public about bicycle safety. He stated the Fire Department will be having a car show on June 26tn at Red Hill Park. He also commented on the opening of the Senior Center at Central Park this Saturday. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 11 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he will be at the Relay for Life event at Los Qsos High School this Saturday before attending the Central Park dedication. He wished the Announcement/Presentations could be done earlier in the day or another night and possibly televised. He stated on 19th Street as it goes east, and at Fairmont where it ends, there are barricades and felt something permanent needs to be done. He stated Tyler Dickinson was killed last week by a truck and that the neighborhood wants to look at this issue. He asked that the meeting be adjourned in his name. He did not think the accident was the driver' fault. He felt speed in the City also needs to be looked at because of the accidents it is causing. He stated there are a lot of streetlights that are out throughout the City and felt this needs to be addressed. He also commented he is waiting for the restaurant rating meeting to occur in order to work with some of the restaurants. 12. UPDATE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE WEST SIDF OF KLUSMAN AVENUE, NORTH OF DIAMOND AVENUF - Development Review DRC2003-00015 - Carney. (CONTINUED FROM MAY 4, 2005) A staff report was presented by Brad Buller, City Planner Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: A lady, did not identify herself, asked if there has been any resolution because she stated there is a west-facing window and that all of her privacy is gone because the window is not obscured. She felt the window should be obscured and not operable. Mitch Ochio talked about the homes that were built that look down into their yards and homes. He stated there were trees that were removed which the developer stated would not be removed. Cheryl Ochio stated she has a view of the fourth house on the end. She stated she went into the homes with Brad Buller, Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Spagnolo and stated you can see right into her yard and home. She stated it was her understanding that every west-facing window would be tiptoe or obscured, and stated they are not. She felt like she has been led astray and is disappointed about the window that faces west. She stated it had been designed with enhanced landscaping and architectural changes which was to help this problem. She felt the developer should change out the windows on the last house so you cannot look into the homes of the people below. Mayor Alexander suggested that this be worked out with two City Councilmembers, Building Official Trang Huynh, and City Planner Brad Buller to come to an understanding about this. Councilmember Michael stated he agreed and felt the developer should be pad of the meeting also. Mayor Alexander stated he did not feel the developer should be punished any more in order to correct this. The Council concurred that Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Gutierrez would be the members for the Ad Hoc Subcommittee to work on this issue. Mayor Alexander felt the City was trying to help these people by having this special Ad Hoc Subcommittee to resolve this matter. Joel Cascadden, Developer of the new homes, stated he would like to be part of any meeting. He stated he has problems with changing out any windows as suggested by Councilmember Gutierrez. He added this would be very costly to do this. He stated the fourth house was never mentioned in any previous meetings. He stated to bring these windows into question at this point is unfair. He stated he is willing to talk about additional landscaping. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has nothing against the developer, but is concerned about the view looking into the homes below this project. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 12 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to organize an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Gutierrez to meet with the residents and developer to find a resolution to this matter. Councilmember Williams asked about the trees that were removed and wanted to make sure they had a permit. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes they did have a permit. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 13. CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES (CO 96-047) AND ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES (CO 96-048) AND DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS A staff report and power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's office, were given by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III. James Markman, City Attorney, informed the Council the provider can terminate the contract with a 30- day notice. He stated it would better if the City sits down with the County and work out the transition Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City has had this experience before when it was done with the Library. He informed the Council of the process that occurred. He stated this would have to be done in an ordinary, systematic fashion with the assistance of Mr. Winograd. Mayor Alexander felt this is different than the Library transition. He hoped this could be done as quickly as possible. Councilmember Michael stated he is concerned that the transition is handled properly. He hoped that Nathan Winograd can help with this. He stated he is excited about a change for the shelter so it is a "no kill" shelter and that it is a City run facility. He stressed again that he felt it should be well-planned. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed. She felt the fault for these problems is on the City and felt the contract should have been looked at closer. She felt the City should sit down with the County and that it is up to the City to get what we want. She felt the City should listen to Mr. Winograd and wait for his recommendation. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he would like the City to hire a Manager/Director to work with Mr. Winograd. He felt this should be looked at very carefully. Councilmember Williams stated when the Library transition started, someone was hired to develop the plan. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what this entire transition would cost. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated she did not know, but that Mr. Winograd has been asked to include this in his report. Councilmember Gutierrez felt it would be irresponsible to do this not knowing the cost to do the transition. He hoped that volunteers could help with the transition. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: John Lyons felt the shelter should be taken over right away by hiring a Director and using volunteers. He felt possibly the cost of this should go to the voters. He stated he would like to see it go out to bid for animal control services. He stated the cost does have to be looked at. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 13 Nicole Myerchin felt by having a "no kill" shelter would help to generate revenue. She stated they are asking both contracts with the County to be terminated and for the termination to be done within one year. She stated she hoped updates could be given at each meeting how this is progressing. She did not feel the County staff should be kept and that it should be a whole new transition. She stated it is important that this be completed within one year and that it is a "no kill" shelter. Susan McGuire stated she has fostered 44 animals and will continue with this. She asked for the City Council's assistance at the shelter. A lady, (did not identify herself), stated she fosters animals. She felt the contract should be pullecl and that a Director be hired. Julie Yost, Upland, asked that the City Council be open to a City run shelter. She felt Mr. Winograd can help the City through this. She stated she would be happy to volunteer. A man, (did not identify himself), felt this issue should come to an end and felt the City should get started. Jenna Bell, a volunteer for Cats in Need, felt it was important to have a Director during the transition. She felt both County contracts should be terminated and that it should be a City run shelter. Bill McCliman did not understand how the contract can go for another year. He felt the contract should be terminated today and have Upland run the shelter until we can start our own. Councilmember Spagnolo stated we have a proposal from Mr. Winograd and felt it should be accepted. He stated he would like to make that motion because it contains everything that is needed and would like to also hire a Director. Mayor Alexander stated he does not understand the County's attitude with this issue. He stated he would like to add to the motion that we shoot for a period not to exceed nine months. He felt the City is not receiving the service from the County that is in the contract. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City can approve the termination of the contracts, and then bring back an amendment to Mr. Winograd's contract at the next meeting. Councilmember Michael felt getting someone on board is a first step for this transition. He felt there should be a complaint proceeding like every other depadment has to try to resolve problems. He felt no less than nine months was needed for the transition. James Markman, City Attorney stated the contract termination period with the County can always be extended if it needs to be. Councilmember Michael stated he would like to see the transition plan negotiated. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Michael to direct staff to terminate the County contracts by January 31, 2006 at the close of business and to negotiate the transition. Councilmember Michael stated he is also concerned about dog bite issues, vicious dogs, etc. He asked how this would be taken care of. He asked if we should transition the shelter and animal control at the same time. Councilmember Wirliams felt this should all come under one department and should be done in tandem. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes May 18, 2005 Page 14 James Markman, City Attorney, stated for clarity the Council has just instructed the City Manager to give the County notice of termination on both contracts effective January 31, 2006 and instruct the City to negotiate an orderly transition of the services. Councilmember Williams felt what we expect from the County needs to be in writing as it relates to the transition process. [[ J. ADJOURNMENT [ MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael to adjourn in the memory of Tyler Dickinson. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 1, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, June 1, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session items. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTIES: (1) Real property owned by Allyn B. Scheau, et al and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") 0209-143-02. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owner, Allyn B. Scheau et al. (2) Real property owned by Tony L. Chan, et al and identified as APN 0209-251-05. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owner, Tony L. Chan, et al. (3) Real property owned by KVL and identified as APN 0209-242-08 and 0209-251-11. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owner, KVL. (4) Real property owned by SKW-MBT Operations, Inc. SKW-MBT Operations, Inc. and identified as APN 0209-251-14 Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owner, SKiN-MBT Operations, Inc. (5) Real property owned by Hofer Properties, LLC pardi and identified as APN 0209-131-02. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regardingNin~ructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owners, Hofer Properties, LLC. (6) Real property owned by D.R. Landmark, Inc. and identified as APN 0209-131-01. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owners, D.R. Landmark, Inc. (7) Real property owned by Manuel and Rita Corral and identified as APN 0209-242-07. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owners, Manuel and Rita Corral. (8) Real I:,roperty owned by Armando and Yadira Amador and identified as APN 0209-242-06. Negotiating parties, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price. Negotiating parties may negotiate with the property owners, Armando and Yadira Amador. City Council Minutes June 1,2005 Page 2 [I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session items. The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS The closed session recessed at 6:48 p.m. with no action taken. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meet nq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 1, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Mike TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Ryan Samples, Recreation Coordinator; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst ~11; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. City Council Minutes June 1, 2005 Page 3 ]] B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Announcement by Fire Chief Bryan regarding reporting of emergencies by cell phone. Fire Chief Peter Bryan informed everyone about the emergency numbers to be used when using a cell phone. He suggested everyone program these numbers into their cell phones for easier access. The numbers are: 941-1488 for police and 983-5911 for fire. B2. Presentation of California Park and Recreation Society District XI 2005 Layman's Award to Elmer and Wilma Steeve of Rancho Cucamonga. The Mayor and City Council, along with Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent, and Ryan Samples, Recreation Coordinator, presented the awards to Elmer and Wilma Steeve and Jane Penney. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of National Trails Day, June 4, 2005. The Mayor and City Council presented the Proclamation to members of the following equestrian organizations: Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy, Rancho Rebels 4H Club, Alta Loma Riding Club, and Rancho Cucamonga Equestrian Patrol B4. A Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to resident Megan Ridley in honor of her recent recognition at the Jurupa Rodeo. The Mayor and City Council presented the certificate to Megan Ridley. Il c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [ C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda, congratulated the City on the opening of the Central Park project. He commented on the event and its success. He stated the City has spent two years talking about the animal shelter. He felt the City should keep the County's animal control services. He felt there should be an election for people to vote to pay a tax to cover the shelter costs. He felt there should be some changes within the fire department in order to improve response times. He felt someone with experience should be hired to be the director of the animal shelter and felt it should be Nicole Myerchin. He stated he liked the cell phone program that Chief Bryan has been talking about. C2. Lynn Christy wanted to talk about senior housing. She felt the seniors in Iow income housing are being priced out of their homes. She felt the City should help with this problem and felt there should be rent control for people over 60 years old. She asked that this be agendized for the next meeting. Mayor Alexander stated it would be agendized. C3. Leslie Grimes felt spaying and neutering should also be focused on when talking about the problems at the animal shelter. She felt Riverside should be contacted about their program. She suggested people volunteer and get involved. C4. Deputy Greg Hill of the Police Department talked about the Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo to be held this Saturday at the Epicenter parking lot from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. He stated they have 25 bikes to be given away and also 400 helmets. He stated there would be free food and that it would be a great day. Councilmember Spagnolo stated this is a great way to memorialize Ron ~ves. City Council Minutes June 1, 2005 Page 4 I] ~,. CONSENT CALENDAR I D1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 2005 April 20, 2005 April 26, 2005 (Special Meeting) May 4, 2005 D2. Appr~va~ ~f warrants' Check Register 5/11/~5 thr~ugh 5/24/~5 and Payr~l~ 5/11~~5 thr~ugh 5/24~~5~ for a total amount of $4,822,507.47. D3. Approval to purchase an HP Design Jet 5550PS 60-inch plotter from Americomp Infosystems utilizing a Western States Contracting Alliance Contract, in the amount of $18,550, and authorization to appropriate $18,550 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund into Acct. No. 1714001-5605. D4. Approval of a change order in the amount of $30,000 with Butsko Utility Design, Inc. for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. D5. Approval of single source replacement purchase of one Leeboy 7000 Asphalt Paver from Nixon-Egli Equipment Company of Santa Fe Springs, California in the amount of $67,343.75 and the replacement purchase of a Zieman Model 2650 Paver Special Trailer from Scott Equipment of Fortrans, California in the amount of $11,046.80 funded from Account No. 1712001-5603 (Equipment Replacement fund) approved in the 2004-2005 budget. D6. Approval of the single source purchase of a replacement traffic signal controller assembly for the traffic signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Drive from Econolite Control Products, Inc., in the amount of $28,865.14, to be funded from Capital Improvement Funds, Acct. No. 11703035300 (Contract Services), and appropriate an additional $29,000.00 from 170 (Gas Tax 2105/Prop 111) Fund Balance to Acct. No. 11703035300. D7. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $140,000 from Measure 'T' fund balance to Acct. No. 11763035650 for the East Avenue and Base Line Road Improvements in cooperation with the City of Fontana. D8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $278,100.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Pouk & Steinle, Inc., (CO 05-048) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $27,810.00, for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 KV Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections, Equipment Project, to be funded from Municipal Utility funds, Account No. 17053035650/14857505-0 and Account No. 17053035650/1487705-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $7,000.00 to Account No. 17053035650/1485705-0 from Municipal Utility fund balance. D9. Approval to accept the bids and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $119,762.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Fleming Environmental, Inc., (CO 05-049) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $11,976.20, for the Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from PD 85 funds, Account No. 18483035650/1224848-0. D10. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No. 14759-1 located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue submitted by Pulte Homes - APN: 226-102-17. RESOLUTION NO. 05-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14759-1 RESOLUTION NO. 05-173 City Council Minutes June 1, 2005 Page 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14759-1 Dll. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16461, located on laomosa Street, west of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis and James and Bernice Dunn. RESOLUTION NO. 05-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16461, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 16461 D12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16297, located at the corner east of White Oak Avenue and Elm Street, submitted by Lot Number One Partnership, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16297, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16297 D13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16507, located on both Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, north of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by LC Rochester Avenue, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16507, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-179 City Council Minutes June 1,2005 Page 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16507 D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for DRC2005- 00088, located on 12735 Banyan Street, east of Greenwood Place submitted by Michael Helm. RESOLUTION NO. 05-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2005- 00088 RESOLUTION NO. 05-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR DRC2005-00088 D15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Driveway Easement, Construction and Maintenance Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape maintenance District no. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map No. 16237 located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard submitted by B/DC Partners, L.P. A California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 05-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16237, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, DRIVEWAY EASEMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 05-183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16237 D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. City Council Minutes June 1,2005 Page 7 D17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15174, located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Rochester Avenue submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. D18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15902, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street submitted by US Home Corporation. D19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 16042, located at the southwest corner of 8th Street and Center Avenue submitted by Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, LLC. D20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16398, located at the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th Street submitted by W. F. Construction, Inc. D21. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond retained as Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16189, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street submitted by Aphrck, LLC. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II ,;. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. II ,~. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I No Items Submitted. Gl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A staff report was presented by Jori Gillespie, Traffic Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if Milliken is still 50 miles per hour. Jori Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated it is south of Banyan. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to address this at a future meeting. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 743. City Council Minutes June 1, 2005 Page 8 ORDINANCE NO. 743 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 743 for the June 15, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Councilmember Williams asked how soon after this is approved do the signs get posted. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated this is already done. Items H1 through H10 were discussed at the same time. H1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, (MASI PLAZA) AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE A staff report was presented by Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor. James Markman, City Attorney, stated these are Community Facilities Districts' annual levies to service bonds. He stated these amounts were originally established by a landowner vote. He stated for the most part, they remain status quo. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 05-184 through 05-193. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 H2. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATF SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) City Council Minutes June 1, 2005 Page 9 H3. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THF CURRENT RATE SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 {DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) H4. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 {IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-R SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B H5. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 {IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A H6. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 {IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7), SERIES B WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THF CURRENT RATE SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7), SERIES B H7. APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES A WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. City Council Minutes June 1,2005 Page10 RESOLUTION NO. 05-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & S), SERIES A HS. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000~02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) Hg. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATF SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) H10. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATF SEE ITEM H1 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. RESOLUTION NO. 05-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS H11. CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,149.00 AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2004), ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, INTO ACCT. NO. 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $440.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE), $5,800.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5200 (OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE), AND $59,909.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-EQUIPMENT); AND APPROVAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM COMSERCO COMMUNICATIONS, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $59,452.07, FUNDED $434.81 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5152, $911.42 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5200, AND $59,452.07 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5603. A staff report was presented by Peter Bryan, Fire Chief. City Council Minutes June 1,2005 Page 11 MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. H12. UPDATE ON ANIMAL SERVICES (Oral) A staff report and power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office) were presented by Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager. Councilmember Michael stated he is pleased to see the County working with the City on the transition. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. ACTION: Report received and filed. H13. CONSIDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NO KILL SOLUTIONS (CO 05-050) FOR ANIMAL SERVICES CONSULTATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,000, TO BF FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 1001-104-5300. A staff report was presented by Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager. Councilmember Michael wanted to make sure Mr. Winograd understands the scope of service on the agreement. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated yes he does. Councilmember Gutierrez asked when we would know from Mr. Winograd how much this would cost. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated it would be part of the final report that Mr. Winograd would have completed in the fall. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he will be curious to see what this cost will be. He asked which account this money will come from. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated it is from the animal control account and that money has been appropriated from reserves. Mayor Alexander felt volunteers will help to decrease the cost to run the Shelter. Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated that volunteers will be invaluable. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve CO 05-050. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I[ I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo talked about the Ron Ives Rodeo and encouraged people to support it. He stated the fire fighters will be having their Burn Survivor's Car Show at Red Hill Park later in June. City Council Minutes June1,2005 Page 12 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to look at the street light outage issue and get them all to work. He stated there are hundreds that are not working and felt this needs to be looked at. He felt the synchronization of signals also needs to be looked at. He felt there should be a fire truck at the top of Sapphire that could quickly respond to the west side of the City. He stated the Central Park facilities are beautiful. He stated people are anxious to keep going on the Central Park site. He asked people to be kind to each other. Councilmember Michael stated on May 21 the Senior Center and Community Center opened, and he wanted to thank previous Councilmembers that had been pad of this. He thanked the Lewis' and Jim Brulte and Congressman Dreier for their help to get this done. He stated the EOC opened on the third floor of the Police Department building. He thanked Congressman Dreier for getting federal money to help develop this. Councilmember Williams stated the EOC was very well done. She stated it will be a great regional asset. She stated the City is very grateful to Congressman Dreier. She commented on the eight new fire fighters that have completed the fire academy. She stated she and other City Councilmembers attended a Playschool Graduation the other day. She stated the opening of Central Park was a joyous occasion. Mayor Alexander also commented on the wonderful Central Park facility and thanked staff for their work and for keeping the City Council on track with this. 12. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (oral report) Councilmember Williams thanked Congressman Dreier for what he did to assist with the EOC. She also presented information on the State's budget situation. Il J. ADJOURNMENT I MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * June 1,2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, June 1, 2005, in the Emergency Operations Center of the Civic Center located at 10510 Civic Center Drive in the Police Building, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Chairman William J. Alexander. Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Brad Buller, City Planner; Pete Odiz, Police Chief; Peter Bryan, Fire Chief; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. No communication was made from the public. I C. ITEM OF BUSINESS I C1. OPENING AND DEMONSTRATION OF NEW EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) Fire Chief Peter Bryan welcomed everyone to the new EOC and made introductions of those present. The City Council presented Congressman Dreier with a plaque thanking him for his assistance with funding for the EOC. Congressman Dreier presented the City Council with an American Flag. Fire Chief Peter Bryan demonstrated the technology in the EOC. [ D. ADJOURNMENT I The meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223220 5/25/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 102.28 AP- 00223220 5/25/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 30.98 AP-00223220 5/25/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 204.36 AP- 00223220 5/25/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 142.08 AP - 00223221 5/25/2005 AAA PORTABLE RESTROOM CO 670.00 AP- 00223222 5/25/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.70 AP- 00223222 5/25/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 121.15 AP- 00223222 5/25/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 194.26 AP- 00223222 5/25/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 222.10 AP- 00223222 5/25/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 114.44 AP- 00223223 5/25/2005 ABLAC 16.39 AP- 00223224 5/25/2005 ABLETR.ONICS 46.55 AP- 00223225 5/25/2005 ADAMS, DEBRA 838.95 AP- 00223226 5/25/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,122.00 AP- 00223226 5/25/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,188.00 AP- 00223229 5/25/2005 AIR.GAS WEST 30.70 AP - 00223230 5/25/2005 ALL AROUND PEST AND TERMITE 1,861.00 AP - 00223231 5/25/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 11.86 AP - 00223232 5/25/2005 ALLAN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER. CORP 245.10 AP - 00223233 5/25/2005 ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL 5,000.00 AP - 00223235 5/25/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 26.94 AP - 00223235 5/25/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 213.45 AP - 00223235 5/25/2005 AMEPdCAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 213.45 AP - 00223235 5/25/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 484.69 AP - 00223235 5/25/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 484.69 AP - 00223236 5/25/2005 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 152.50 AP - 00223237 5/25/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 13.97 AP - 00223237 5/25/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 283.40 AP - 00223238 5/25/2005 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 10,033.88 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 91.48 AP- 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 97.39 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 25.78 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 42.00 AP- 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 116.14 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 432.43 AP- 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 290.86 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 477.30 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 109.94 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 241.52 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION t,602.15 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 737.70 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 525.00 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 652.59 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 96.00 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 408.66 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 738.52 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 238.62 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 190.19 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 193.90 AP 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CP~EDIT UNION -149.95 AP- 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 211.88 AP - 00223241 5/25/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 525.00 AP- 00223242 5/25/2005 ASSI SECURITY 325.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~, 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223243 5/25/2005 ASSOCIATED AIR BALANCE INC 8,315.00 AP- 00223244 5/25/2005 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,735.63 AP - 00223246 5/25/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,115.00 AP - 00223247 5/25/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 88.32 AP - 00223247 5/25/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 98.00 AP - 00223247 5/25/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 388.29 AP - 00223247 5/25/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 223.65 AP - 00223247 5/25/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 177.79 AP- 00223248 5/25/2005 BRICKLEY ENVIRONMENTAL 33,007.50 AP - 00223248 5/25/2005 BRICKLEY ENVIRONMENTAL 33,007.50 AP- 00223249 5/25/2005 BRYNGELSON PRINTS 1,302.43 AP- 00223250 5/25/2005 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 863.90 AP- 00223250 5/25/2005 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 262.98 AP - 00223251 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,418.00 AP - 00223251 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN 1NC. 3,626.00 AP - 00223252 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 472.86 AP - 00223252 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 17.20 AP - 00223252 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 148.31 AP - 00223252 5/25/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 2,951.92 AP- 00223254 5/25/2005 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 76,512.20 AP- 00223255 5/25/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 56.25 AP- 00223256 5/25/2005 CALSENSE 384.59 AP- 00223257 5/25/2005 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 6,250.00 AP - 00223258 5/25/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 86.20 AP - 00223258 5/25/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 86.20 AP- 00223259 5/25/2005 CHARTER MEDIA 1NC. 2,016.00 AP - 00223260 5/25/2005 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT: 252.00 AP- 00223261 5/25/2005 CITY RENTALS 162.03 AP- 00223261 5/25/2005 CITY RENTALS 429.85 AP - 00223262 5/25/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,350.00 AP- 00223262 5/25/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 12,760.00 AP- 00223262 5/25/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 780.00 AP- 00223262 5/25/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 900.00 AP - 00223263 5/25/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP- 00223264 5/25/2005 CLEAN STREET 5,355.00 AP 00223265 5/25/2005 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 17,678.00 AP 00223265 5/25/2005 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 303.00 AP 00223266 5/25/2005 COLLETTE, PETE 30.00 AP 00223267 5/25/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 11.10 AP 00223267 5/25/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 37.72 AP 00223268 5/25/2005 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 316.25 AP 00223271 5/25/2005 CREWS, SHIRLEY 250.00 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.77 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 365.47 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 453.44 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 552.80 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.22 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 287.62 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 402.21 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,182.19 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 99.14 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 308.26 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 28.45 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 299.44 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 877.82 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.30 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 393.76 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.57 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.84 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 739.69 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 355.98 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 550.75 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 320.56 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.27 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 510.65 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.77 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.78 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 496.91 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.40 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 31.20 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 589.03 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.86 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,102.83 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 454.21 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.11 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 388.05 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 236.82 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.30 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 269.23 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 390.42 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 180.98 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.00 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 762.23 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 724.57 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312.77 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 357.65 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.90 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 12.16 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 533.73 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,768.27 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.31 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.04 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.43 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 329.l 1 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 158.84 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.51 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.74 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.44 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 214.81 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.01 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.33 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 510.41 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.83 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.47 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.68 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 149.39 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270.02 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:sn 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date. Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.58 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.16 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.16 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.93 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.22 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.26 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 242.72 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 700.98 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 359.13 AP 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 691.55 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.48 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 647.29 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 575.30 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 930.74 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 386.98 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 479.96 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.06 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 685.57 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 20.t 8 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312.77 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 526.01 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.66 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.42 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 217.17 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 217.18 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 641.26 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 533.66 AP - 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 155.34 AP -00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.41 AP- 00223274 5/25/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.05 AP - 00223275 5/25/2005 D & N CONSTRUCTION 500.00 AP - 00223276 5/25/2005 D 7 CONSULTING INC 229.12 AP- 00223279 5/25/2005 DATA QUICK 93.50 AP- 00223280 5/25/2005 DAVEY ELECTRIC 20.00 AP- 00223282 5/25/2005 DELEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00223283 5/25/2005 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 110.00 AP- 00223284 5/25/2005 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 124.20 AP- 00223285 5/25/2005 DESERT STATIONERS 1,136.11 AP - 00223287 5/25/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 79.34 AP - 00223288 5/25/2005 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 141.91 AP- 00223289 5/25/2005 EAST GATE ESTATES 924.80 AP - 00223290 5/25/2005 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,631.72 AP- 00223290 5/25/2005 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 0.08 AP- 00223291 5/25/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 8,920.42 AP- 00223291 5/25/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 3,647.53 AP- 00223291 5/25/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 2,000.00 AP - 00223292 5/25/2005 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,050.00 AP- 00223293 5/25/2005 EMPIRE MOTOR SPORTS 541.63 AP- 00223293 5/25/2005 EMPIRE MOTOR SPORTS 490.00 AP- 00223294 5/25/2005 ENPOINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP - 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP - 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP - 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 367.51 AP- 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:I/ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP- 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP- 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP - 00223294 5/25/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 125.00 AP- 00223295 5/25/2005 ESKENAZI, MOISES 250.00 AP- 00223295 5/25/2005 ESKENAZI, MOISES 220.00 AP- 00223295 5/25/2005 ESKENAZI, MOISES 97.00 AP- 00223296 5/25/2005 ETHRIDGE, SANDIE 175.00 AP- 00223297 5/25/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 64.65 AP - 00223298 5/25/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 250.00 AP- 00223298 5/25/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 793.83 AP- 00223298 5/25/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 179.50 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 133.45 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 20.74 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 2.39 AP-00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENALCOMPANY 69.56 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 20.57 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 76.94 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENALCOMPANY 58.98 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 285.86 AP- 00223299 5/25/2005 FASTENALCOMPANY 106.23 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.91 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.27 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8.45 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.39 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.88 AP - 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP - 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP . 16.97 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP- 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP - 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.75 AP 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.72 AP 00223300 5/25/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.09 AP 00223301 5/25/2005 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 1.06 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 924.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 510.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,170.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 930.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00 AP 00223302 5/25/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 780.00 AP 00223305 5/25/2005 FLEET GLASS 139.08 AP 00223305 5/25/2005 FLEET GLASS 150.00 AP 00223306 5/25/2005 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00 AP 00223307 5/25/2005 FORD OFUPLAND INC -15.73 AP 00223307 5/25/2005 FORD OFUPLAND 1NC 17.28 AP 00223309 5/25/2005 FRENCH, CHARISSE 250.00 AP 00223310 5/25/2005 FRONT BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES 850.00 AP 00223311 5/25/2005 GARNER, CATHLEEN 49.41 AP 00223312 5/25/2005 GEIST, STEVE 57.10 AP 00223313 5/25/2005 GIRON, GABBY 10.00 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAINGER 3,448.00 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAxINGER 26.57 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAINGER 277.34 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.'~~ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAINGER 219.27 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAYNGER 52.97 AP-00223314 5/25/2005 GRA1NGER 845.24 AP ~ 00223314 5/25/2005 GRA1NGER 16.99 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAINGER 16.99 AP- 00223314 5/25/2005 GRAINGER 680.95 AP - 00223314 5/25/2005 GRA[NGER 172.28 AP - 00223314 5/25/2005 GRA1NGER 283.17 AP - 00223314 5/25/2005 GRA1NGER 1,475.10 AP- 00223315 5/25/2005 GRIFFITHCOMPANY 1,000.00 AP- 00223316 5/25/2005 GUEST SUITES 833.28 AP - 00223316 5/25/2005 GUEST SUITES 833.28 AP- 00223317 5/25/2005 HILEMAN CO, THE 4,714.00 AP- 00223318 5/25/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 139.91 AP 00223318 5/25/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 376.30 AP 00223319 5/25/2005 HOMELESS OUTREACHPRGMS AND EDUCATI( 533.00 AP 00223319 5/25/2005 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 533.00 AP 00223320 5/25/2005 HOSE MAN 1NC 66.65 AP 00223321 5/25/2005 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP 00223321 5/25/2005 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00 AP 00223323 5/25/2005 HUGHES SUPPLY [NC 2,503.83 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 990.00 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS [NC 569.94 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 150.00 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS [NC 300.00 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 221.20 AP 00223324 5/25/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 220.00 AP 00223325 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 1,185.25 AP 00223325 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 912.37 AP 00223325 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 105.40 AP 00223326 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 883.96 AP 00223326 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 450.80 AP 00223326 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 206.64 AP 00223326 5/25/2005 IBM CORPORATION 348.24 AP 00223327 5/25/2005 IMPERIAL SCOTT SPECIALTIES [NC 467.88 AP 00223328 5/25/2005 [NDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 45.16 AP 00223328 5/25/2005 INDUSTRIAL SLrPPLY COMPANY 130.14 AP 00223329 5/25/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 780.46 AP 00223329 5/25/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,137.66 AP 00223330 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.80 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 434.70 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 148.35 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 399.05 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 118.45 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 637.10 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 338.10 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 259.90 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLET[N 680.80 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 279.45 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 676.20 AP 00223331 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLET1N 297.85 AP - 00223332 5/25/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 85.95 AP - 00223333 5/25/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 60.51 AP-00223333 5/25/2005 [NTERSTATEBATTERIES 39.82 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time'S_ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00223333 5/25/2005 1NTERSTATEBATTERIES -45.00 AP - 00223334 5/25/2005 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 316.45 AP- 00223334 5/25/2005 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 449.25 AP - 00223335 5/25/2005 IRRIGATOR TECH TRAINING SCHOOL 200.00 AP - 00223336 5/25/2005 J L CONSTRUCTION CO 1,000.00 AP - 00223337 5/25/2005 JOHNSTON AND ASSOCIATES INC 5,000.00 AP - 00223338 5/25/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 250.00 AP - 00223338 5/25/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 2,520.31 AP - 00223339 5/25/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1NC 67,749.57 AP - 00223339 5/25/2005 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 931.24 AP- 00223340 5/25/2005 KB HOME 828.36 AP - 00223341 5/25/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,173.40 AP-00223342 5/25/2005 KELLY EQUIPMENT 230.87 AP- 00223343 5/25/2005 KING, DAN 7.52 AP - 00223345 5/25/2005 L A SANTA ANITA LLC 31,718.13 AP - 00223346 5/25/2005 LARRY MURDOCK 500.00 AP- 00223349 5/25/2005 LEWIS OPEKATING CORP 1,105.40 AP - 00223350 5/25/2005 LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL 321.00 AP- 00223352 5/25/2005 MAHAR, DAVID 60.00 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 13,103.85 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,449.15 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 1,081.89 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 3,376.73 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,279.01 AP - 00223354 5/25/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 541.67 AP - 00223355 5/25/2005 MARK CHRIS 1NC 280.11 AP - 00223355 5/25/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 159.51 AP- 00223356 5/25/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 225.00 AP- 00223356 5/25/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -56.25 AP-00223357 5/25/2005 MCI 1,139.85 AP - 00223358 5/25/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 466.56 AP 00223358 5/25/2005 MCMASTERCARRSUPPLYCOMPANY 350.21 AP 00223358 5/25/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 129.46 AP 00223358 5/25/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 403.63 AP 00223359 5/25/2005 MERRITT, JOY 90.00 AP 00223360 5/25/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 308.26 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.65 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 49.33 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 114.95 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTOPARTS 84.62 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPAAUTO PARTS 23.20 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPAAUTO PARTS 68.57 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPAAUTO PARTS 242.00 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPAAUTO PARTS 47.30 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 113.19 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 93.05 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.79 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS -3.99 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2tl.75 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 68.40 AP 00223362 5/25/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.77 AP- 00223364 5/25/2005 NATIONAL DEFEP, R~D 15,585.08 AP- 00223365 5/25/2005 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATI 20.00 AP- 00223366 5/25/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 52.39 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 10:26:0 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 th. rough 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223366 5/25/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 92.78 AP- 00223366 5/25/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.39 AP-00223367 5/25/2005 NEWREAL INC 500.00 AP- 00223368 5/25/2005 NIGCO'S HAIR SALON 47.00 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 123.52 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 88.58 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 34.39 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 33.84 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 56.37 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 213.94 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 14,574.27 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5,922.24 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5.34 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 83.51 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 10.60 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 97.48 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5.18 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 196.99 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 146.28 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 179.31 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -25.25 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1.68 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -22.93 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 193.94 AP-00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -47.15 AP - 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 47. t5 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -23.69 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 57.08 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 220.89 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 196.32 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 201.47 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 38.36 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -38.36 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 560.55 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 32.09 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 91.19 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 10.60 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 58.44 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 64.63 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 104.22 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 30.00 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 29.08 AP- 00223370 5/25/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 12.13 AP- 00223372 5/25/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 75.57 AP - 00223372 5/25/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 93.72 AP - 00223372 5/25/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15.04 AP - 00223372 5/25/2005 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAILE 53.86 AP-00223373 5/25/2005 OTSUKA, DENNIS 100.00 AP- 00223374 5/25/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 8,157.64 AP - 00223375 5/25/2005 PACIFIC CREST COMM. 110.00 AP - 00223376 5/25/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 51,343.77 AP- 00223377 5/25/2005 PARK SPECIALTIES 921.50 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 517.20 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel~ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 thmugh 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP-00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP-00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP - 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 31.25 AP-00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 170.00 AP - 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 349.11 AP ~ 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 346.96 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 253.21 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 170.00 AP- 00223379 5/25/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 192.87 AP - 00223381 5/25/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC 599.98 AP- 00223381 5/25/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC 796.94 AP - 00223381 5/25/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC 736.14 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,805.70 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,422.32 AP - 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 12,048.24 AP - 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,253.27 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 10,590.91 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,669.28 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,148.92 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,724.59 AP- 00223382 5/25/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,828.88 AP- 00223383 5/25/2005 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 5,887.13 AP- 00223384 5/25/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 18,520.43 AP- 00223384 5/25/2005 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 33,360.38 AP-00223385 5/25/2005 POWERPLUS 25.00 AP- 00223386 5/25/2005 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTION INC 78.64 AP- 00223387 5/25/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00223388 5/25/2005 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,818.15 AP- 00223389 5/25/2005 PRINCIPAL LIFE 16,300.00 AP - 00223390 5/25/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP-00223392 5/25/2005 RCPFA 6,891.91 AP- 00223393 5/25/2005 REXEL CALCON 29.97 AP- 00223393 5/25/2005 REXEL CALCON 134.46 AP- 00223393 5/25/2005 REXELCALCON 37.72 AP - 00223393 5/25/2005 REXEL CALCON 631.42 AP- 00223393 5/25/2005 REXEL CALCON 26.73 AP- 00223394 5/25/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 287.37 AP- 00223394 5/25/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 32.26 AP - 00223395 5/25/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 70.00 AP - 00223395 5/25/2005 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 135.00 AP - 00223395 5/25/2005 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 63.00 AP - 00223395 5/25/2005 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 85.00 AP- 00223395 5/25/2005 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 70.00 AP - 00223396 5/25/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 246.79 AP - 00223396 5/25/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 190.00 AP - 00223396 5/25/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 190.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:/~ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223396 5/25/2005 RODRIGUEZ [NC, R Y 357.52 AP - 00223396 5/25/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00 AP- 00223397 5/25/2005 SAFELITEAUTOGLASS 216.61 AP- 00223398 5/25/2005 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY 300.00 AP- 00223399 5/25/2005 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY 267.00 AP- 00223400 5/25/2005 SAN BERNARD]NO COUNTY 45.00 AP - 00223401 5/25/2005 SAN BERNARD[NO CTY LAND USE SERVICES E 92.00 AP - 00223402 5/25/2005 SAN BERNARD]NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 248.00 AP- 00223403 5/25/2005 SBC LONG DISTANCE 14.64 AP - 00223403 5/25/2005 SBC LONG DISTANCE -1.56 AP 00223404 5/25/2005 SBC 55.78 AP 00223404 5/25/2005 SBC 55.78 AP 00223404 5/25/2005 SBC 1,379.05 AP 00223405 5/25/2005 SHOETERIA 150.00 AP 00223405 5/25/2005 SHOETERIA 96.96 AP 00223405 5/25/2005 SHOETERIA 116.36 AP 00223405 5/25/2005 SHOETERIA 140.60 AP 00223405 5/25/2005 SHOETERIA 116.36 AP 00223408 5/25/2005 SIMPLOTPARTNERS 429.92 AP 00223410 5/25/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 180.57 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,555.52 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.22 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.57 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.80 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.48 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.60 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.62 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.26 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I3.63 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.31 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.29 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.85 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.43 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.59 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.66 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.95 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.31 AP 00223413. 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.37 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.81 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.11 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.11 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,397.13 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.10 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.15 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.69 AP - 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.67 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.29 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~, ~ 10:26:0 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 thxough 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.31 AP - 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.42 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.69 AP - 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.14 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.77 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.79 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.69 AP- 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.87 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.58 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.66 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.94 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHEILN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.98 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.80 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.20 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.64 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.84 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.76 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.22 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223413 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223414 5/25/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,593.00 AP 00223415 5/25/2005 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 975.25 AP 00223416 5/25/2005 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 175.60 AP 00223416 5/25/2005 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 175.60 AP 00223417 5/25/2005 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 1,510.39 AP 00223417 5/25/2005 STEELWORKERS OLDT1MERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP 00223418 5/25/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 269.70 AP 00223419 5/25/2005 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 37.00 AP 00223419 5/25/2005 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 37.00 AP 00223420 5/25/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 2,725.00 AP 00223422 5/25/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,428.20 AP 00223423 5/25/2005 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,427.00 AP 00223423 5/25/2005 UMPS AREUS ASSOCIATION 240.00 AP 00223424 5/25/2005 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 177.80 AP 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 43.61 AP 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 639.77 AP - 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 41.91 AP- 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 35.54 AP - 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 114.59 AP - 00223425 5/25/2005 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 113.08 AP - 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 647.64 AP- 00223425 5/25/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.56 AP - 00223426 5/25/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 1,351.70 AP- 00223427 5/25/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00 AP- 00223428 5/25/2005 UPS 25.12 AP- 00223428 5/25/2005 UPS 20.14 AP-00223428 5/25/2005 UPS 38.69 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time// 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223429 5/25/2005 URS CORPORATION 9,625.45 AP- 00223430 5/25/2005 VALDEZ, JOSE 20.00 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERiZON 83.37 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 42.85 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 206.98 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 467.75 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 48.16 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.37 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 150.42 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.37 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.41 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 90.87 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 92.13 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 92.11 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 393.80 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.72 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.41 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 92.02 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 92.13 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 33.88 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.80 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 208.29 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 633.09 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VEPdZON 92.13 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 56.83 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.91 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 88.14 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.85 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 497.25 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 322.96 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.86 AP - 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 411.05 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 36.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 60.34 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 29.02 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 2.87 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.86 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VEP-dZON 20.55 AP-00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 59.74 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 89.56 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.41 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.31 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 27.85 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 56.84 AP - 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 31.56 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~q 10:26:0 Id.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 133.19 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 28.41 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 47.41 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 467.75 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 574.95 AP- 00223432 5/25/2005 VERIZON 78.06 AP- 00223433 5/25/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 550.00 AP - 00223434 5/25/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER [NC 500.00 AP - 00223434 5/25/2005 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER [NC 500.00 AP- 00223435 5/25/2005 VISTA PAINT 27.90 AP - 00223436 5/25/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY 136,520.01 AP - 00223436 5/25/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY 55,836.68 AP - 00223436 5/25/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY -13,652.00 AP - 00223436 5/25/2005 W AND W STEEL COMPANY -5,583.67 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 13.14 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 118.83 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 129.34 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 46.34 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 155.16 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 95.04 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 187.56 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 572.42 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 95.87 AP - 00223438 5/25/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 135.77 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 657.03 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 397.26 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8.30 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 94.78 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 573.58 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 600.00 AP- 00223439 5/25/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 927.86 AP-00223440 5/25/2005 WEST GROUP 194.35 AP - 00223441 5/25/2005 WEST PAC HAWAII AGENCY [NC 15.00 AP - 00223444 5/25/2005 WLP EVERGREEN APARTMENTS LLC 5,000.00 AP - 00223445 5/25/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 11,251.37 AP-00223445 5/25/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP- 00223445 5/25/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP- 00223445 5/25/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04 AP- 00223446 5/25/2005 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES [NC 712.60 AP - 00223448 6/1/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 293.82 AP - 00223448 6/1/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 1,271.28 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 17.24 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 24.24 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 4.85 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 143.92 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 242.50 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 477.47 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 112.50 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 289.51 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 312.58 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,212.18 AP - 00223449 6/1/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 208.70 AP - 00223450 6/1/2005 ABLAC 273.17 AP - 00223451 6/1/2005 ABLETRONICS 9.28 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timet~ ,~ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223452 6/1/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 622.08 AP - 00223452 6/1/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 45.36 AP - 00223453 6/1/2005 ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOFTWARE 450.00 AP - 00223456 6/1/2005 AMERISERVE REPIPING 24.86 AP - 00223457 6/1/2005 ARC CONSTRUCTION 190.00 AP - 00223458 6/1/2005 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00223459 6/1/2005 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 48.18 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 401.26 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 327.96 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 254.27 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 155.20 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 120.46 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 79.78 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 71.56 : AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 28.45 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 300.80 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 18.21 AP - 00223460 6/1/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 541.80 AP - 00223461 6/1/2005 BALDY FIRE AND SAFETY 93.00 AP - 00223462 6/1/2005 BALLY TOTAL FITNESS 547.50 AP - 00223463 6/1/2005 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 63.00 AP - 00223463 6/I/2005 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 882.87 AP - 00223464 6/1/2005 BUSINESS 21 PUBLISHING 547.55 AP - 00223465 6/I/2005 C.B.A. PRODUCTIONS 399.00 AP - 00223466 6/1/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 231.92 AP - 00223467 6/I/2005 CALBO 97.50 AP - 00223469 6/1/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25.00 AP - 00223470 6/1/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50 AP - 00223471 6/1/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 232.33 AP - 00223473 6/1/2005 CASILLAS, TONY 397.00 AP - 00223474 6/1/2005 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 559.52 AP - 00223475 6/1/2005 CENTRAL RESTAURANT PRODUCTS 2,023.76 AP - 00223475 6/1/2005 CENTRAL RESTAURANT PRODUCTS 989.98 AP - 00223475 6/1/2005 CENTRAL RESTAURANT PRODUCTS 1,060.00 AP - 00223476 6/1/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 1,422.30 AP - 00223477 6/1/2005 CHILD CARE DEPOT 2,216.57 AP - 00223478 6/1/2005 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. I 11.97 AP - 00223481 6/1/2005 CLEAN STREET 3,575.00 AP - 00223482 6/1/2005 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,567.76 AP - 00223483 6/1/2005 COAST FULFILLMENT CORP. 1,389.36 AP - 00223484 6/1/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 1,300.00 AP - 00223484 6/1/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 1,000.00 AP - 00223484 6/1/2005 COAST RECREATION [NC 1,000.00 AP - 00223484 6/1/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 857.42 AP - 00223485 6/1/2005 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 1,198.72 AP - 00223486 6/1/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00223487 6/1/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.55 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 720.49 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 839.18 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.01 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.86 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 396.47 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 331.19 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timei~/.J 10:26:0 /-/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.79 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 244.54 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,480.64 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 260.77 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.92 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 474.81 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.69 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.56 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 436.15 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 181.93 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,054.78 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.19 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP ~ 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,188.12 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.06 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.89 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.05 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.14 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 27.29 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122.33 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 657.59 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.45 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.33 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105.68 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 317.11 AP - 00223488 6/1/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.26 AP - 00223489 6/1/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 44,992.50 AP - 00223490 6/1/2005 DARPLEE, ERICA 750.00 AP - 00223491 6/1/2005 DEPARTMENT ISSUE INCORPORATED 759.63 AP - 00223492 6/1/2005 DMJM HARRIS 5,789.15 AP - 00223493 6/1/2005 DOMINGUEZ GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTK/ 94,460.51 AP - 00223493 6/1/2005 DOMINGUEZ GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTR/ -9,446.05 AP - 00223495 6/1/2005 ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP 8,267.38 AP- 00223496 6/1/2005 EMPIRE MOTOR SPORTS 461.63 AP - 00223497 6/1/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 13,553.49 AP - 00223498 6/1/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 96.27 AP - 00223498 6/1/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 187.01 AP - 00223499 6/1/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 41.89 AP - 00223499 6/1/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 39.85 AP - 00223499 6/1/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 14.33 AP - 00223499 6/1/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 3,615.43 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.75 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 13.32 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORE 15.32 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.03 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 35.31 AP - 00223500 6/1/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.74 AP - 00223501 6/1/2005 FEDEX KINKO'S OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES 107.75 AP - 00223502 6/1/2005 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 242.44 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time}, ~a 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 thmugh 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223503 6/1/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00223503 6/1/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00 AP - 00223503 6/1/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP - 00223505 6/1/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 138.49 AP - 00223506 6/1/2005 FRAME ART 392.00 AP - 00223508 6/1/2005 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 121,588.80 AP - 00223508 6/1/2005 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 121,063.85 AP 00223509 6/1/2005 GEOGRAPHICS 4,335.21 AP 00223510 6/1/2005 GRAINGER 168.18 AP 00223511 6/1/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 25.22 AP 00223511 6/1/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 624.95 AP 00223511 6/1/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 235.39 AP 00223512 6/1/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 33.28 AP 00223513 6/1/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 380.89 AP 00223514 6/1/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 4.65 AP 00223514 6/I/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 34.37 AP 00223514 6/1/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 38.77 AP 00223514 6/1/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 44.45 AP 00223517 6/1/2005 HUNT, JENNIFER 22.37 AP 00223517 6/1/2005 HUNT, JENNIFER 36.60 AP 00223518 6/1/2005 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP 00223519 6/1/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 94.90 AP 00223519 6/1/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS INC 162.66 AP 00223519 6/1/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS INC 20.52 AP 00223520 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 28.80 AP 00223521 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLET1N 683.45 AP 00223521 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 492.90 AP 00223521 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 299.70 AP 00223521 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 294.55 AP 00223521 6/1/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 294.55 AP 00223522 6/1/2005 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 110.16 AP 00223522 6/1/2005 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 99.36 AP 00223523 6/1/2005 JOHNSON'S ACCUPUNCTURE & HERB, PATTY 17.00 AP 00223524 6/1/2005 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 60.00 AP 00223525 6/1/2005 KONE 1NC 814.19 AP 00223526 6/1/2005 LARSON, KIRK 74.25 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 450.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 600.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 170.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 600.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 550.00 AP 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 550.00 AP - 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 400.00 AP - 00223528 6/1/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 550.00 AP - 00223530 6/1/2005 LOPEZ, GUADALUPE 26.27 AP - 00223531 6/1/2005 LOS ANGELES METRO PUBLIC PURCHASING A~ 50.00 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 14,086.77 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 517.36 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,029.69 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,661.42 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5t3.57 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel*J 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 236.13 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 58.70 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 69.86 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,454.75 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTUR.AL ENT 1NC 2,740.15 AP - 00223532 6/1/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 766.73 AP - 00223533 6/1/2005 MARSHMAN CONSTRUCTION ][NC 150.50 AP - 00223534 6/1/2005 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP ~ 00223535 6/1/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 116.50 AP - 00223538 6/1/2005 MMASC 705.00 AP - 00223539 6/1/2005 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC ]NC 1,486.72 AP - 00223540 6/1/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 357.83 AP - 00223541 6/1/2005 MR TS 24HR TOWING 170.00 AP - 00223542 6/1/2005 MSA 235.00 AP - 00223544 6/1/2005 N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD 5.54 AP - 00223545 6/1/2005 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 143.52 AP - 00223546 6/1/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 28,209.68 AP - 00223547 6/1/2005 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16,920.00 AP - 00223548 6/1/2005 NEWPORT PRI-NTING SYSTEMS 84.07 AP - 00223548 6/1/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 84.07 AP - 00223548 6/I/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 84.07 AP - 00223548 6/1/2005 NEWPORT PPd~',IT]NG SYSTEMS 46.39 AP - 00223548 6/1/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS I85.56 AP - 00223550 6/1/2005 NIELSEN, NETTLE 55.79 AP - 00223551 6/1/2005 NIKKIS FLAG SHOPPE 1,359.35 AP - 00223551 6/1/2005 NIKKIS FLAG SHOPPE 629.65 AP - 00223551 6/1/2005 NIKKIS FLAG SHOPPE 15.92 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 31.19 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 570.56 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 42.73 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.98 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 74.00 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -2.67 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 140.02 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 76.14 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -19.40 AP-00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 6.59 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 44.74 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 360.98 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 2.86 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 318.01 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 163.42 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -4.05 AP - 00223552 6/1/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 4.05 AP - 00223553 6/1/2005 OLD COUNTRY BAKERY 155.48 AP - 00223554 6/1/2005 ONTARIO FLOWERS AND SUPPLIES 92.00 AP - 00223555 6/1/2005 OUTDOOR DIMENSIONS 500.00 AP - 00223557 6/1/2005 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 163.80 AP - 00223558 6/1/2005 PHONG, LORRAINE 55.79 AP - 00223559 6/1/2005 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 169.90 AP - 00223559 6/1/2005 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 53.95 AP - 00223560 6/1/2005 POMONA PRINT STOP 56.57 AP - 00223561 6/1/2005 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 53.47 AP - 00223562 6/1/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES ]NC 136.20 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time'~/~ 10:26:0 Il CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223563 6/1/2005 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 988.82 AP - 00223563 6/1/2005 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 611.09 AP - 00223563 6/1/2005 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 834.35 AP - 00223563 6/1/2005 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 722.95 AP - 00223564 6/1/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00223564 6/1/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00223567 6/1/2005 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME1 100.00 AP - 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 35.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 35.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 25.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 25.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 25.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 35.00 AP 00223568 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 35.00 AP 00223569 6/1/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGAQUAKES PROFESSION~ 280.00 AP 00223571 6/1/2005 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP 00223572 6/1/2005 REITER, AUGUST 1,560.00 AP 00223574 6/1/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,471.35 AP 00223575 6/1/2005 RICO, ERIC 19.01 AP 00223576 6/1/2005 RIVERA, GEORGE 19.01 AP 00223577 6/1/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 85.53 AP 00223577 6/1/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 2,200.43 AP 00223577 6/1/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 124.77 AP 00223578 6/1/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00 AP 00223579 6/1/2005 ROWLEN, ALISON 99.59 AP 00223580 6/1/2005 RSCS LLC 580.00 AP 00223581 6/1/2005 S B AND O 1NC 3,600.00 AP 00223582 6/1/2005 SAFELITE AUTOGLASS 216.61 AP 00223583 6/1/2005 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 271.53 AP 00223584 6/1/2005 SALAZAR, MARK 19.01 AP 00223585 6/1/2005 SAN BERNARD1NO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.50 AP 00223586 6/1/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 322.50 AP 00223587 6/1/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 125.67 AP 00223587 6/1/2005 SAN BERNARD1NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 68.13 AP 00223589 6/1/2005 SCCCA 30.00 AP 00223591 6/1/2005 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 33.24 AP 00223591 6/1/2005 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 33.80 AP 00223592 6/1/2005 SCOTT, DIANA 250.00 AP 00223593 6/1/2005 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 281.59 AP 00223595 6/1/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 1,185.25 AP 00223596 6/1/2005 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 1,321.42 AP 00223596 6/1/2005 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 608.68 AP - 00223597 6/1/2005 SILHANEK, KAREN 55.79 AP - 00223598 6/1/2005 SIR SPEEDY 308.17 AP - 00223600 6/1/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 137.20 AP - 00223600 6/1/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,497.10 AP - 00223600 6/I/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 333.08 AP - 00223601 6/1/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 800.00 AP - 00223601 6/1/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,500.00 AP - 00223601 6/1/2005 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00 AP - 00223602 6/1/2005 SONSATIONAL ACTIVITIES 2,700.00 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,314.68 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timej ~ 10:26:0 / O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.79 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.11 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.79 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.55 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.67 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.10 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.79 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.10 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.44 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.28 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.73 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 292.26 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.61 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.68 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.97 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.37 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.92 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.7I AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.62 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.28 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.29 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/I/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.07 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.99 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.84 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout TimeI/~ 10:26:0 1 -t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 tbaough 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.02 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.18 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.95 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.72 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.52 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.48 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 423.74 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1SON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.35 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.39 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.92 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.19 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.29 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.92 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 410.97 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.83 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.83 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.62 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.30 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.52 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.92 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.87 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.19 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.26 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.70 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.70 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.05 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.79 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.31 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.31 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.02 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time~/~I10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.43 AP ~ 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.88 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.44 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.64 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 382.03 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.69 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.39 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.07 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,175.39 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.21 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.47 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.62 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.60 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.29 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.27 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 176.65 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.53 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.21 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 158.18 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP ~ 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 459.31 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.13 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.68 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.49 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.39 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.08 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ] 10:26:0 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.38 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.09 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.78 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.67 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.72 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.98 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.84 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 284.76 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.17 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNL~ EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.33 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.79 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.43 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.45 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.07 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.55 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.87 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57 AP - 00223608 6/1/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.39 AP - 00223610 6/1/2005 SPARKLETTS 30.75 AP 00223611 6/1/2005 SPECTRA COMPANY 2,308.00 AP 00223612 6/1/2005 STEINY AND COMPANY 1NC 18,700.00 AP 00223612 6/1/2005 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -1,870.00 AP 00223612 6/1/2005 STEINYAND COMPANY 1NC -1,321.40 AP 00223612 6/1/2005 STE1NYAND COMPANY INC 13,214.00 AP 00223613 6/1/2005 STEVES TOW1NG AND TRANSPORT 43.00 AP 00223614 6/1/2005 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00 AP 00223615 6/1/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 2,725.00 AP 00223615 6/1/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 3,275.00 AP 00223616 6/1/2005 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 70.00 AP 00223619 6/1/2005 TOUCH VISION INC 541.13 AP 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,900.00 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 798.26 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 65,204.25 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 50.37 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,808.94 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,128.76 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 294.97 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,533.33 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,832.38 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,442.13 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 679.77 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 165.40 AP - 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 603.34 AP 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 15,954.64 AP 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 18,964.86 AP 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 23,112.28 AP 00223620 6/1/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 74.18 AP 00223621 6/1/2005 TUCKER & SON INC, J G 86.73 AP 00223622 6/1/2005 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00 AP 00223624 6/1/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 2,758.92 AP 00223624 6/1/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 32,415.82 AP 00223625 6/1/2005 UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS 27.96 AP 00223625 6/1/2005 UNITED CALIFORNIA FACTORS 28.55 AP 00223626 6/1/2005 UNITED WAY 554.32 AP 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 118.52 AP 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 829.67 AP 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOC1TA WIRELESS 385.20 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 177.79 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 29.62 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 957.55 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 239.39 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 29.93 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 29.92 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 179.54 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 209.46 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 389.00 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 837.86 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 119.69 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 29.63 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 207.42 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 237.05 AP - 00223627 6/1/2005 VELOCITA WIRELESS 948.19 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 49.34 AP - 00223630 6/I/2005 VERIZON 21.05 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 20.65 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 20.80 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VE1LIZON 20.69 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 29.37 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 29.37 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 28.41 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VERIZON 20.55 AP - 00223630 6/1/2005 VEILIZON 20.55 AP - 00223631 6/1/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 251.94 AP - 00223632 6/1/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 550.00 AP - 00223633 6/1/2005 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00223634 6/1/2005 VSPI 1NC 2,250.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porn'alt Layout Time~ '~ 10:26:0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/25/2005 through 6/7/2005 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00223636 6/1/2005 WARD, DESIREE 452.50 AP - 00223637 6/1/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 783.37 AP - 00223637 6/1/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 191.15 AP - 00223639 6/1/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 216.59 AP - 00223641 6/1/2005 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 726.28 AP - 00223642 6/1/2005 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 46,807.50 AP - 00223643 6/1/2005 WUMBUS CORPORATION 654.04 AP - 00223645 6/1/2005 YEAGER SKANSKA 1NC 192.07 AP - 00223646 6/6/2005 CALRO 125.00 Total for Check ID AP: 1,909,009.88 Total for Entity: 1,909,009.88 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 06/08/200 Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim~ ~d~0:26:0 ] City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31,2005 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 29,582,795.54 29,582,79554 29,582,795.54 16.68 1 1 2.690 2.727 Certificates of Deposg/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,510,242.90 1,515,000.00 0.85 733 89 2.150 2.180 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 125,750,000 O0 123,675,603.01 125,688,175.00 70.86 1,488 916 3.139 3182 Treasury Securities - Coupon 5,000,000 O0 4,956,250.00 4,985,546,88 2.81 1,070 713 3.184 3.229 Investment Agreements 15,600,000.00 15,600,000 O0 15,600,000.00 8.80 I 1 3.682 3.733 Investments 177,447,795.54 175,324,891.45 177,371,517.42 100.00% 1,091 670 3.104 3.148 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 501,543~08 501,54308 501,543.08 I I 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 113.33 113.33 Subtotal 501,65641 501,656.41 Total Cash and Investments 177,949,338.62 175,826,547.86 177,873,173.83 1,091 670 3.104 3.148 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 465,756.32 4,814,475.37 Average Daily Balance 177,672,051.09 170,037,570.60 Effective Rate of Return 3.09% 3.08% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 6, 2004. A copy of the investment bolicy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govem the management of these funds. On October 21,2004 the City entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegee/Transamedca in the amount of $15,600,000. The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6.00% per annum through June 28, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period. Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21,2009, the Investment Agreement will earn interest at 2.41%. '~l~)average annual rate of return over the five year peded is 3.682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above. Ja~, ~:r ea~r Portfolio CITY CP n Date: 06/07/2005 - 18:24 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody*s 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS00005 0(~05 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 29,582,795.54 29,582,795.54 29,582,795.54 2.727 2.690 1 Subtotal and Average 29,269,892.31 ~29,582,795.54 29,582,795.54 29,582,795.54 2.690 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 0605OE6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,510,242.90 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 89 08/29/2005 Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,510,242.90 1,515,0(]0.00 2.150 89 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2,500,000.00 2,443,750.00 2,496,875.09 3.120 3~104 1,083 05/19/2008 31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/05/2003 2,000,000.00 1,960,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 1,098 06/03/2008 31331QN78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5,500,000.00 5,372,812.50 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 646 03/09/2007 31331Q7C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/13/2003 3,000,0~0.00 2,949,375.CO 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 803 08/13/2007 31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,0CO.00 1,977,500.00 1,996,562.50 3.375 3.374 845 09/24~2007 31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,972,500.00 2,CO0,000.00 3.970 3.916 1,112 00/17/2008 31331TWH0 1253 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,000,000.C0 1,936,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.240 3.196 1,020 03/17/2008 31331TWJ6 1254 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 4,000,000.00 3,885,000.00 3,997,500.00 3.550 3.517 1,265 11/17/2008 31331TG62 1263 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3,500,000.CO 3,482,500.00 3,479,000.00 3~920 4.012 1,244 10/27/2008 31331TU25 1272 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3,000,C(X).O9 2,997,187.50 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 922 12/10/2007 3136F6YQ6 1278 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/22/2CO5 2,000,000~00 1,995,000.00 1,998,600.00 4000 3.970 996 02/22/2008 31339XJJ4 1210 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 00/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,893,750.00 5,000,0C0.00 2.650 2.614 740 06/11/2007 31339XB78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/15/2003 3,000,000.00 2,933,437.50 3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 653 03/10/2CO7 31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,956,250.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 748 06/19/2007 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 2,000,0(X100 1,941,250.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 847 09/26/2007 31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/1~(X)3 3,000,000.00 2,936,250.00 3,000,000.00 2.540 2.506 684 04/16/2007 3133XlP27 1237 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 2,990,625.00 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,244 10/27/2008 3133X3DX8 1247 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,980,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 880 10/29/2007 3133X4MR9 1255 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 5,000,000.00 4,926,562.50 5,000,000.00 2.750 2.713 573 12/26/2006 3133X4XF3 1256 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,000,000.00 1,955,000.00 2,000,CO0.00 3.500 3.452 940 12/20/2007 3133XSWA2 1264 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000,000.00 1,967,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.167 973 01/30/2008 3133XAR25 1277 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 1,000,000.00 999.375.00 1.000,000.00 4,0~0 4.024 1.174 08/16/2008 3133XAM~N4 1279 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 1,000,000.00 997,812.50 ~99,750.00 4.000 3.954 996 0W22J2(X)8 3128X1BD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,000.00 4,942,095.18 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,083 05/19/2008 3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/26/2003 3,000,000.00 2,946,708.07 3,0~0,000.00 2.500 2.466 545 11/26/2006 3128X1OK0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/'25/2003 4,000,000.00 3,895,072.02 4,0CO,000.00 3.100 3.058 910 11/26/2007 3128XIJDO 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 5,000,000.00 4,879,479.98 4,998,500.~) 3.030 2.995 1,106 06/11/2008 3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 00/12/2~03 2.000,(X30.00 1.946.488.04 2.000,000.CO 2.400 2.367 740 06/11/2007 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 06~07/2005 - 18:24 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6~.1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management page3 Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated Y'rM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Market Value Book Value Rata Moody's 360 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128XIL96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/08/20(O 4,000,000.00 3,954,227.90 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 473 09/17/2006 3128X2.P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,988,464.81 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,398 05/30/2009 3128X07G8 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/12/2004 1,250,000.00 1,240,376.28 1,248,750.00 3650 3.626 1,071 05/07/2008 3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/19/2004 2,000,000.00 1,959,043.88 1,997,600.00 2.920 2.916 870 10/19/2007 3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/25/2004 1,000,000.00 987,351.07 1,0oO,O00.00 3280 3.235 877 1 0/26/2007 3128X3CS0 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/29/2004 5,000,000.00 4,954,650.12 5,000,000.00 3.450 3.403 880 10/29/2007 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/24/2004 3,000,000.00 2,989,458.16 2,999,C~2.50 3.750 3.708 905 11/25/2007 3136F3VO6 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/2712003 7,000,000.00 6,818,437.50 6,996,500.00 2.500 2.479 723 05/25/2007 3136F3Q82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/15/2003 4,000,000.00 3,891,250.00 4,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 775 07/16/2007 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/2912003 4,000,000.00 3,926,250.00 3,993,750.00 3.300 3.289 1,154 07/29/2008 3136F4B45 1243 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/12/2003 2,000,000.00 1,970,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 559 12/12/2006 3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2004 3,000,000.00 2,971,875.00 2,999,062.50 3.750 3.707 1,286 12/08/2008 3136F5GP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4,CO0,000.00 3,982,500.DO 4,000,000.00 4.040 3.985 1,384 05/15/2009 3136F5PB1 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1,000,000.00 980,937.50 1,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 863 10/12/2007 Subtotal and Average 125,688,175.00 125,750,000.00 123,675,603.01 125,688,175.00 3.139 916 Treasury Securities * Coupon 912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE 06~9/2004 5,000,000.00 4,956,250.00 4,985,546.88 3.125 3.184 713 05/16/2007 Subtotal and Average 4,985,546.88 5,0~0,000.00 4,956,250.00 4,985,546.88 3.184 713 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON / TRANSAMERICA 10/21/2004 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 3.682 1 Subtotal and Average 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 15,600,000.00 3.682 1 Total and Average 1'r/,672,051.09 177,447,795.54 175,324,891.45 177,371,517.42 3.104 670 Portfolio CITY CP  ate: 0E¢07/2C~5 o 18:24 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details - Cash May 31, 2005 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 0~07/2005 - 18:24 PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~Rept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Activity By Type May 1, 2005 through May 31,2005 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Inve~L,,,=,~t # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.727 g,7CO,000.00 3,000,000.00 Subtotal '~.~.795.54 9,700,0(]0.00 3,000,000.00 29,582,795.54 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 SANK OF AMERICA 0.500 0.00 115,623.61 Subtotal 617,166.69 0.00 115,623.61 501,543.08 Certificates of DeposltJNeg. - Bank Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Subtotal ~;.~.175.00 125,688,175.00 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 4,985,546.88 4,985,546.88 Investment Agreements Subtotal 15,600.n~n rm 15,600,000.00 Total 171~88,684.11 9,700,000.00 3,115,623.61 177,873,060.50 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) Sym Rept V6~21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended April 30, 2005 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturffy Cost Bond Issue Pavina Aaent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.00% $ 258,097.09 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/411997 N/A* 0.00% 243,250.14 Reserve Fund N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 81411997 N/A 0.00% 2.75 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 501,349.98 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 NIA* 0.00% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/111999 N/A* 1.41% 585,396.77 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.41% 1,099,738.76 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.41% 105,348.97 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,790,484.50 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,291,834.48 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~ a N C H O C U C a M O N G A DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III ~' Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department, the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and the Planning Division. This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken on this item. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · Certificate of Occupancy issued on May 25, 2005. Contractor continuing to work on punch list items. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · Contractor finishing landscape installation. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project: · Building construction proceeding well. Theatre-Continuing to set and weld theatre steel. Working on the rough-in for the basement overhead. Event Center - Steel for roof decking has been set and welded. Forms for roof deck are in place and scaffolding is set. Working on fireproofing the steel. Library-Concrete has been poured for the slab-on-grade. Roof decking has been welded and second floor concrete has been poured. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 Victoria Arbors Park: · Continuing hardscape and landscape installation. Starting general clean-up of site. Anticipate placement of sod by July 1. Heritage Park: · An Eagle Scout project was completed which involved the installation of some new plant material along the slope north of the main parking lot. Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail: · Grove to Base Line: City to start construction in Fiscal Year 2005/06 on widening of Foothill Boulevard, including installing a new bridge where Pacific Electric crosses Foothill Boulevard. Engineering staff is working on grant application under the state's Bicycle Transportation Account funding to design and construct. · Base Line Road to Amethyst: Planning staff has applied for Safe Route to School funds for the Base Line Road to Amethyst reach. · Amethyst to Archibald: Funded with $272,000 in state's Bicycle Transportation Account money and local matching funds (beautification fees). Anticipate advertising for construction bids in May 2005 and completing construction September 2005. · Archibald to Haven: SANBAG approved $954,900 in Transportation Development Act Funds (Article 3). Design and construction in Fiscal Year 2005/06. · Haven to 1200' east of Etiwanda Avenue: Funded with $3.7 million federal STE grant money and local matching funds (beautification fees). City's environmental consultant, LSA Associates, Inc. is working on a response to Caltrans corrections to vadous environmental documents to obtain the federal environmental clearance. This is a crucial step that is required before we can get our allocation of the grant funding. · Two short segments of the trail have been constructed in Rancho Cucamonga along Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard in conjunction with the construction of Central Park Phase I and Day Creek Fire Station, respectively. Both of these are "re-routes" to new signalized crossings of these busy streets. · The Planning Department and City Attorney have almost concluded negotiations with Joseph Filippi Winery on an agreement that would allow then to plant vineyards as an interim use down the middle of the railroad corridor. SANBAG, who owns the corridor, requires that the middle 45 feet be reserved for future transit. · The Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation on October 13, 2004 approved use of their non-profit organization to become a donation collector for this important trail project. To date we have raised $646 in donations. · The Fdends of the Pacific Electric Trail have formed a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and is working on a newsletter. · Outdoor recreation retailer REI has expressed a strong desire to support this trail project through their community service program of volunteers who do trail construction and Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 maintenance. At REI's Tour de Rancho bike ride event held April 3, 2005, staff manned a booth with information about Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. · Staff from the Planning Department and Community Services Department, met with REI's special events specialist to brainstorm ideas for events promoting the trail. If P, EI awards their grant, a special event could be held at their store. A chadty shopping night could be held in conjunction with REI's movie night where REI would donate a percentage of their sales profits to the trail. Another idea is to film a promotional video, which could include interviews at the City's first groundbreaking or grand opening ceremony. These videos could be shown as a public service announcement on RCTV3. Etiwanda Railway Station Property: The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan identifies the station as a high priority "signature trailhead". The Engineering Department has begun using the station property for public works maintenance activities. · Site Clean-up: Work completed, including demolition of accessory structures. Next phase will be the historic depot building, pending funding availability, starting with repairing roof, then environmental clean-up (e.g., removal of asbestos, lead paint, and mold). · Etiwanda Depot: A structural engineer has inspected the depot and is preparing a report on needed work. Burglar alarms have been installed in the station building; however, there are no fire sprinklers in the building. Engineering Department has estimated it would cost approximately $253,000, including fire sprinklers, to bring station up to code for occupancy by Public Works staff. $50,000 in CDBG construction funds approved in FY2004-05, mostly for demolition of accessory structures on property. Mayor and staff met with restaurateur who is interested in leasing Station building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before going any further, City Council policy discussion needed regarding desired uses for property. If City wishes to sublease Station, or a portion thereof, to a commercial business, then a Request for Proposals should be issued. · Alternative Land Use Concepts: The Planning Department will be contracting for the preparation of three alternative schemes for the entire 4 +/- acre property to provide the basis for consideration. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · A number of new classes have been added to the roster of activities for semors. These include: Tap Dancing, Sculpting Techniques and Ballroom Dancing. · Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, June 23, 9:00 a.m. at the Brulte Senior Center at Central Park. Trips and Tours: · Paqeant of the Masters at The Festival of the Arts - Thursday, July 14. California's finest summer event is staged in a six-acre canyon park neat Laguna Beach. Participants will enjoy exhibits, workshops, demonstrations and musical entertainment. The festival's most famous display 'q'he Pageant of The Masters", is a ninety minute production of "living Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 pictures" with real people posing like their counterparts in the original pieces of art. Cost: $65.00 per person. · Mystery Trip, Saturday, July 16. This trip is for the adventure seeker and the quizzical. If you are willing to take a step into the unknown then this trip is for you. There will be no need for a map, compass, or even a GPS we will rely on the stars to guide our path. If we knew where we were going we would say more. Here's a clue, 1 meal is included. Cost: $78.00 per person. · Kinq Tutankhamun's Exhibition, Saturday, July 23 & Saturday, August 27. Join us as we visit the first United States venue and the only west coast showing of King Tutankhamun's Treasures. We will battle the traffic and parking for you in our deluxe motorcoach. King Tut's treasures will go on display for the first time in 27 years featuring the ancient ruler's gold crown, carved dagger and a massive gold and cloisonn(~ necklace, "Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaoh" will include about 130 of the 5,000 Egyptian artifacts found in King Tut's tomb and additional ancient sites. After we see the treasures we will stop a Lawry's for lunch (included in trip price). Cost: $77.00 per person. Human Services: · The Doctor Is In: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. will present the following lectures at the Brulte Senior Center in June and July: -Polypharmacy: Are you on too many pills? - Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 12:00 p.m. -Dizziness: Is it your brain or ears? - Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00 p.m. -Thyroid: Is it under active thyroid disease? - Tuesday, July 19, 2005, 12:00 p.m. -Are you forgetful? Is it Alzheimer's? - Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 7:00 p.m. · Health Screeninq: A free health screening was held on Tuesday, May 10, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Health assessments were conducted by nurses from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health to individuals 60 years and better, and included the following: health history, pulse, blood pressure, height, weight, hemoglobin and blood sugar. Counseling and referrals were also available. The next free health screening will be on Tuesday, July 12, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. · Herb Garden Class: Home Instead Senior Care will be providing a free Herb Garden Class on Tuesday, June 28th from 9:00 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. at the Brulte Senior Center in the Mesa Courtyard. Seniors can grow fresh herbs in personal containers to keep and use in their favorite recipes. · USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible residents at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income are required. Our next distribution date will be: Monday, July 11th. · Mini-Resource Directory: The Human Services Division has created a Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Mini-Resource Guide for the Inland Empire. The following Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 programs/services are included: Abuse & Domestic Violence, Addiction Treatment, Anti- Gang Programs, Basic Needs & Emergency Assistance, Children & Youth, Consumer Information, Counseling & Mental Health, Education & Literacy, Employment & Volunteering, Family Planning & Parenting, Health & Medical Services, Hotlines, Housing, Legal Assistance and Senior Services. Volunteer Services: · Annual Volunteer Reco.qnition - On Sunday, June 12th the City hosted its annual Volunteer Recognition at the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center at Central Park. The event included a slide show of volunteers in action, refreshments, recognition pins and lanyards. This event is an opportunity for the City to acknowledge and thank its valuable volunteers for all their hard work and dedication. · The table below summarizes the Community Services Department volunteer usa.qe for the month of April 2005, and totals from September through Apdl 2005: Community Month: April 2005 Timeframe: September-April 2005 Services Department #of #of #of #of Division Volunteers Hours $ Value Volunteers Hours $ Value Senior Services 82 640 8,960 450 5,121 71,694 -luman Services 68 311 4,354 339 1,243 17,40;_ Sports 83 756 10,584 922 14,876 208,264 Special Events 0 0 0 85 371 5,194 =erforming Arts 16 194 2,716 71 552 7,728 teens 50 338 4,732 441 2,493 34,902 Youth Programs 3 21 294 6 103 1,442 ~,dministration ." 15 210 40 120 1,680 Totals 307 2,275 31,85{3 2,354 24,879 348,306 Based upon rate of $14,~our. Teens: · The table below and on the next page summarizes teen preRram attendance for the month of May 2005: Program/Activity Attendance - May 2005 Teen Center 1,191 Teen Center Rentals 70 Spruce Skate Facility 728 TPAC - Meetings/Special ProJects 99 TRAC - Babysitting 78 participants Teen Connection 63 volunteers · The Spruce Skate Park - Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws and upcoming major events in other cities. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 · During the month of May, Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) members visited a Senior Assisted Living Facility and participated in fun games with the residents. Our food distribution to those in need took place on May 10t~ at our Lady of Mount Carmel Church. May 18th was our last TRAC meeting for the year until the fall. On May 19th our Annual TRAC Volunteer Recognition Ceremony took place at the City's Park and Recreation Commission meeting. TRAC members working our summer snack bar locations also participated this month in mandatory snack bar training. The training provided guidelines for good customer service, food handling, inventory control and responsible equipment handling. · REAL (Rancho Cucamonqa, Etiwanda, Alta Loma, Los Osos) Hiqh School Advisory Committee continues to meet monthly to plan and develop new programming for high school students. The committee anticipates having some really fun and exciting activities planned for summer. Youth Activities: · Playschool registration for our spring session is currently at 720 students in 47 classes. Waiting lists still exist for some of our classes. May's Playschool attendance was 13,903. Our annual Playschool graduation took place on Tuesday, May 31st from 6:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. at Los Osos High School. Two hundred eighty-two (282) 4 and 5 year olds went through the graduation ceremony while 2,200 family and friends shared in their special night. · Youngsters participating in the Mobile Recreation Proqram, "Fun on the Run" cannot wait to do all the fun games and crafts that have been planned for each park. Three hundred and forty-two (342) children attended our Mobile Recreation program during the month of May. The table below illustrates our park locations andprogram timeframe during the spring (Apdl 4th through June 10th) session. Weekday Park Location Program Time Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Tuesday Hermosa Park 2:30 Dm - 5:00 pm Wedn~-~d~y Old Town Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Thursday Ellena Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Friday Windrows Park 2:30 pm - 5:00 pm Fun on the Run's summer session will run July 5"' through August 26th from 11:00 am until 3:00 p.m. at the following parks: Weekday Park Location Monday Bear Gulch Park Tuesday Hermosa Park Wednesday Old Town Park Thursday Heritage Park Fdday Windrows Park Lewis Partnership: · Kids Club operates Monday through Friday from 2:30 p.m. until 4:30pm at Del Mar Apartments, Terra Vista, Evergreen and Carmel on alternating days of the week. This after school Club is for youngsters, ages 6-12. Attendance continues to be strong totaling 450 Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 youngsters during the month of May. · Upcomin.q Lewis events include: June 8th & 15th -- Father's Day Craft Day; June 14th~ Flag Day June 16th - Picnic Day at Terra Vista celebrating the last day of school; June 17 - Ice Cream social; and June 14t~ - Friday Night Live events for all Lewis community res dents. Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Aquatics 643 6months-adult N/A Pee Wee Baseball 620 3-5/boys & girls 62 Youth Basketball 935 6-16/boys & girls 104 Youth Volleyball 120 8-14/boys & girls 14 Northtown Play Camp 23 6-13/boys & gids N/A Northtown Youth Basketball 59 6-17/boys & girls 6 Cucamonga Middle School 80 8-adult N/A (CMS) Judo Cucamonga Middle School 140 8-14/boys & girls 14 (CMS) Youth Volleyball Practice RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 555 Youth Basketball 904 Adult Racquetball 421 Youth Racquetball 65 Adult Volleyball 35 Youth Volleyball 28 Jazzemise 1,050 · The table below summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity I # Participants Age/Gender # Teams RacquetballI 24 Adult/Male & Females N/A Basketball (full court) 180 Adult/Males 18 Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 12 Adult Sports: · The table below and on the next page summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,640 165 Males/Females I Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Football 50 5 Males Soccer 672 42 Males/Females Tennis 36 N/A Males/Females · There are Four (4) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of June at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park. Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · The fall/winter field allocation for 2005/2006 (August 1, 2005 - January 31, 2006) was approved at the May 11~h Sports Advisory Committee meeting. The next meeting of the Sports Advisory Committee will take place on August 11th. Special Events: · On Saturday, May 21, 2005 we celebrated the dedication of Central Park. Thousands of residents came out to step foot into the City of Rancho Cucamonga's newest centers. At 9:00 a.m. we hosted the James L. Brulte Senior Center Dedication at the Senior Center Main Entrance. At 10:00 a.m. the Goldy S. Lewis Community Center Dedication took place at the main entrance to the Community Center. After the formal dedication ceremonies, until 2:30 p.m., a Central Park Open House was available for the public. The Open House featured a special occasion showcase in Rancho Cucamonga Hall, class and project displays, activities and program showcases, as well as YMCA activities. · The City's 2005, 4th of July Fireworks Spectacular "Liqhts of Freedom" will be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on Monday, July 4~. Stadium gates will open at 7:00 p.m. and live on-field entertainment will start at 7:30 p.m. Our fireworks show will begin at 9:00 p.m. This year all tickets sales will be handled through the Quakes. Advance ticket sales will begin on June 1st and will continue through July 3~ or whenever the event sells out. Tickets will be for assigned seats so there will be no need for families to rush into the Stadium to save their seats. Pra-sale tickets are $5.00 per person. Tickets on July 4~h will be $8.00 per person. Tickets will be available at the Epicenter Ticket Box Office, on-line or by calling the Quakes Box Office at (909) 481-5252. Our Celebration will also include a Fun Zone for children with interactive run rides and games. The Fun Zone will be open from 4:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. Ticket price is $5.00 per child for unlimited rides. Tickets will be available at the Fun Zone gates only on July 4th. There will be no pre-sale tickets for the Fun Zone. · Arbors Park Openinq - Currently we are looking at Saturday, July 23~ as a tentative date for Arbors Park Opening. As the date comes closer we will have more details and a set time. · Concerts in the Park - Join us for an evening under the stars with our Concerts in the Park series beginning on July 7th and running through August 25th on Thursday evenings at 7pm at the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. This summer's lineup for bands include: > July 7~ The Silverados (Country) ~' July 14th Steve Copeland and Raging Sun (Jazz/Blues) > July 21r~ The Beatless (Rock and Roll) > July 28th Jumpin Joz Band (Swing) Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 > August 4th LA Lyon (Top 40s) > August 11th Upstream (Calypso/Reggae) > August 18th Ronny & the Classics (Oldies) > August 25~h The Answer (Classic Rock) Food vendors (from BBQ to Mexican to funnel cakes and kettle corn) will also be available for purchase beginning at 6:00 p.m. · Movies in the Park - Movies begin the week of July 11t~ through August 19~h. This summer's lineup for movies includes: Shrek 2 (PG), Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (G), Racing Stdpes (PG), The Wizard of Oz (G), Shark Tale (PG), The Sponge Bob Squarepants Movie (P(~). ~ Mondays Central Park* ~, Tuesdays Chaffey Town Square at Victoria Gardens* > Wednesdays Windrows Park > Fridays Red Hill Park *Note: New days & park locations! All movies begin at dusk. Snacks will be available for purchase courtesy of our Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) at Central Park, Windrows Park and Red Hill Park. In the warmth of the summer nights ... grab your blankets and lawn chairs and enjoy our fantastic flicks with the entire family. Cultural and Performing Arts: · Auditions for the City's summer musical, Rodgers & Hammerstein's Cinderella were held in May, and drew over 130 youth and adults trying for the roles in this popular production. The show, with a selected cast of 80 performers, will be presented in July (15th, 16th, 17th, 22nd, 23~, and 24th) at the Los Osos High School Theatre. The show is currently rehearsing 4 days a week at the RC Theatre Arts Center. Tickets for the two-weekend run of Cinderella go on sale beginning June 20th. · Several Theatre Arts Academy classes and pro.qrams will conclude their 8-week session with a performance recital on Saturday, June 11th'at the Theatre Arts Center. Performances by the Youth Theatre Workshop, RC Children's Chorus, Singing for a Lifetime, Showstoppers Performance Troupe, Adult Scene Study and Beginning Acting for Adults will all be represented at the Open House/Recital. Performances begin at 11;30 a.m. and continue throughout the day and evening. Approximately 100 students, youth and adults, will participate in the final performances. · The City's new performance troupe, Showstoppers, will make their debut at the City's annual Volunteer Recognition Reception on Sunday, June 12th at Central Park. The group consists of ten youth between the ages of 8 - 14 years who were selected from an open audition in Apdl. The Showstoppers will also perform at the July 4th Fireworks Spectacular at the Epicenter. Parks and Facilities: · The table on the next page provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of May 2005: Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use Red Hill 2,560 37 52 165 Heritage 1,115 20 22 86 Milliken 696 17 24 80 Hermosa 475 18 19 81 Coyote Canyon 305 7 12 29 Courtyard 250 3 3 7 Amphitheatre 135 3 3 14 TOTAL 5,536 105 135 462 Equestrian Participants* 345 5 10 23 Spectators: 90 * Equestrian pa~cipants include drop-in use. , The table below displays buildin.q rental and recreation contract class attendance numbers for the month of May 2005: Activity Program Number Attendance Lions East Rentals 91 bookings 1,550 Lions East Building 636 facility hours 6,240 Lions West Rentals 338 bookings 3,300 Lions West Building 915 facility hours 15,051 Lewis Center Rentals N/A N/A Lewis Center Building 163 facility hours 182 Contract Classes 334 classes 5,910 (Spring session) · Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups ara very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Epicenter Rentals/Activities: · The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period: ), Maintenance Superintendents Association Training and Trade Show - May 26, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B. > Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Ron Ives Memorial Bike Rodeo - June 4, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. ), Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - All Star Practice and Game - June 6t~ and 8th, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremony - June 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 · Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming rentals and activities: City - 4~ of July Celebration - July 4, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Complex. Quakes/Principal - Family Fun Fest - July 6, 2005 - Epicenter Softball Fields and Extedor Concourse Area. National Adult Baseball Association - Champion Games - July 9, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. >Diamond King Showcase - Champion Games- July 13, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. >VSPI - Used Car Sale - August 10-16, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event Area. > A Ray Fuller Productions/Chaffey Foundation - Jazz Concert- August 20, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium. > Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10, 2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets. ~,Freedom Films - Feature Filming - February/Mamh 2006 - Epicenter Stadium. Park and Recreation Commission: · On June 6, 2005, the City Council and Park and Recreation Commission held a joint meeting to discuss items of mutual interest. · The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, June 16, 2005. The following items ara scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting: Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. Update on Central Park. Review of fees for the Victoda Gardens Cultural Center. Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project. Appointment to various Commission Subcommittees. Consideration of waiver of the Regular Park and Recraation Commission meeting scheduled for July 21, 2005. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · Foundation Board of Directors met on Wednesday, June 8, 2005. The following items were reviewed/discussed at this meeting: > Approval of sponsorship funding for the Community Services Department's production of "'rhe Wodd Goes Round". Consideration of sponsorship of volunteers for the "Mark Christopher Charity Classic - Presented by Adelphia" to be held September 12-18, 2005. > Approval of a Resolution to supercede Resolution Number 88-004A, which will amend the list of officers authorized to order the deposit and withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) for the Ranch Cucamonga Community Foundation. Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project. Update on the Victoda Gardens Cultural Center marketing activities. Update on programming plan for the Lewis Family Playhouse. Review and discussion of fundraising activities. Update on Promoting Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign events. Discussion regarding futura Gala program. Update on additional Lewis Family Playhouse Initiatives. Mayor and Members of the City Council PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE June 15, 2005 > Review and approval of the Foundation's Fiscal Year 2005-2006 annual operating budget. ~ Election of Officers for the Community Foundation for the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year. Respecl ally submitted, Kevin M ' / ~.~y OE~g~eer Community Services Director City Planner I:iCOMMSERV~Council&Boards~CityCouncil~StaffReportst2OO5~update6. 'i 5.05. doc TH E C I T Y 0 F ]~A N Cfl 0 C U CAl~l 0 iq C,A DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: AWARD THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) LOT OF IBM NOTEBOOKS, THINKCENTER CPU'S, MONITORS, IMAGING, WAREHOUSING, AND DEPLOYMENT SERVICES TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, IN THE AMOUNT OF $371,676, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 10012095200 (MIS MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS) FOR MONITORS IN THE AMOUNT OF $65,558, ACCOUNT NUMBER 10012095300 (MIS CONTRACT SERVICES) FOR WARRANTIES iN THE AMOUNT OF $61,100 AND ACCOUNT NUMBER 10012095605 (MIS CAPITAL OUTLAY COMPUTER HARDWARE) FOR DESKTOP AND NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $245,018, FOR THE CITYWlDE DOWNSTREAM UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM Notebooks, ThinkCenter CPU's, monitors, imaging, warehousing, and deployment services to the lowest, responsible bidder, Insight Public Sector, in the amount of $371,676, to be funded from account numbers 10012095200 (MIS Maintenance and Operations) for monitors in the amount of $65,558, account number 10012095300 (MIS Contract Services) for warranties in the amount of $61,100 and account number 10012095605 (MIS Capital Outlay Computer Hardware) for desktop and notebook computers in the amount not to exceed $245,018, for the citywide downstream upgrade and replacement program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Best practices for maintaining a healthy computing environment dictate that computers should be replaced on a regular cycle. In conjunction with these practices, the City implemented a computer replacement program. This program ensures that computer equipment remains reliable and capable of supporting current and near term technology. The computer replacement process is designed to maximize the City's investment in existing and new computers by defining a rotation wherein only one third of the City's computers are replaced in IBM Notebook and ThinkCentre Computers June 15, 2005 Page 2 a cycle. The remaining computers are reassigned such that the oldest one third of the computers are retired from service and ultimately disposed of as surplus. The Information Systems Division (IS) provided specifications to Purchasing to develop a request for bid for 170 CPU's, monitors, and related options to create a complete workstation based on the user type. In addition to providing new product, staff requested information on offering imaging, warehousing, and deployment services to assist and streamline the receiving process. Various local Cities and Counties that have utilized these services have commented they've experienced great success and highly recommend the outsourcing of these types of services. Additionally, due to the successful competitive pricing acquired through the bid process, IS is requesting the purchase of forty notebooks (laptop computers) to be added to this purchase. Purchasing will conduct a negotiated purchase for the notebooks to acquire these from Insight based off of previously competitively bid pricing or better. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Bid and sent it to 18 vendors. Four (4) responses and one (1) "No Bid" were received. Purchasing complied and prepared an analysis of the bid responses. After review of the analysis, the IS Division and Purchasing have determined that Insight Public Sector is the apparent lowest, responsible bidder that meets all required specifications for this bid. Upon award, Insight will work closely with the IS Division to develop a deployment schedule for the receiving of the new product. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence Temple Administrative Services Director R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM COMSERCO COMMUNICATIONS, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $53,715.00 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1382105-5603 (COPS/DREIER EOC GRANT - CAPITAL OUTLAY-EQUIPMENT), AND AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $1,161.00 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1382105-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE) AND $21,649.00 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1382105-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) TO ACCOUNT NO. 1382105-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the single source purchase of Motorola radios and accessories from Comserco Communications, of Riverside, in the amount of $53,715.00 funded from Account No. 1382105-5603 (COPS/Dreier EOC Grant - Capital Outlay-Equipment), and authorization to transfer $1,161.00 from Account No. 1382105- 5152 and $21,649.00 from Account No. 1382105-5300 to Account No. 1382105-5603. The grant is 100% funding with no matching funds required. BACKGROUND The Congressman Dreier Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant was approved and accepted by City Council on January 21, 2004. The grant funds were appropriated for purchases of technology equipment to improve the operations in the EOC. The purchase of computers, software, a complete audio/visual system, and miscellaneous items has been completed. The District is requesting a transfer of the remainder of the Computer Software and Contract Services funds into the Capital Outlay-Equipment account to purchase the remainder of the Motorola radios as needed for the EOC. The COPS Technology Coordinator has approved this change in number of radios. /-/5 Page 2 June '15, 2005 Approval for Motorola Radio Purchase The District provided the equipment list and specifications to Purchasing along with a single source justification request. After review and approval, Purchasing obtained a current quote, based on a piggyback purchase on the County of Los Angeles contract, to include the various radios, and accessories with acceptable terms and conditions and represents the best price currently available. Purchases of this product are direct from Comserco, Motorola's Manufacturer Authorized Representative. Respectfully submitted, Fire Chief -2- TH E CITY O F l~.A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CDBG BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 - An authorization to appropriate $18,736.35 to Account No. 1204314-5650-1342-204 for improvements to the Norton Fisher House and $16,500.00 to Account No. 1204314-5650-1230-204 for the Home Improvement Program; and appropriate $35,236.35 into grant revenue 1204000-4740. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize an amendment to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) budget for fiscal year 2004-2005 in the amount of $35,236.35 (Account No. 1204314-5650); and $35,236.35 into grant revenue (Account No. 1204000-4740). ANALYSIS: The requested appropriation is essentially a timing issue for the payment of work completed during the 2004-2005 program year. Established accounting principals require that work completed during a program year be paid out of funds appropriated to that program year. Following preparation of the 2005-2006 CDBG budget, no additional work was anticipated in the subject activities; however, improvements have progressed on the ongoing rehabilitation of the Norton-Fisher House and under a loan provided by the City',~, Home Improvement Program, thus necessitating the appropriation. This is not an appropriation of new funds, but an appropriation of current year funds that were programmed into the 2005-2006 CDBG budget. These activities include: Norton-Fisher House · Account: 1204314-5650-1342-204 · $18,736.35 Home Improvement Program · Account: 1204314-5650-1230-204 · $16,500.00 Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:TG/Is T H E C I T ¥ O F l~AN Cll 0 C U CAM 0 N C,A Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH AN "INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT FUND" (FUND 188) TO ACCOUNT FOR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLECTION OF AB939 RECYCLING FEES; AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER AB939 FUND BALANCE OF $1,665,071 AND ESTIMATED CURRENT YEAR NET AB939 REVENUES OF $246,170 (TOTAL OF $1,911,241) FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT FUND; AND AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,911,241 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1188000-8001 AND $1,911,241 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001001-9188. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council provide authorization to establish an "Integrated Waste Management Fund" (Fund 188) to account for revenues and expenditures associated with the collection of AB939 recycling fees; authorization to transfer AB939 fund balance of $1,665,071 and estimated current year net AB939 revenues of $246,170 (total of $1,911,241) from the General Fund to the Integrated Waste Management Fund; and authorization for appropriations in the amount of $1,911,241 into account number 1188000-8001 and $1,911,241 into account number 1001001-9188. BACKGROUND The City currently collects franchise fees from businesses providing commercial and residential refuse collection services within the City. The franchise fee of 15.75% is based on gross revenues and is comprised of the following: 10% franchise fee, 5% Assembly Bill 939 (AB939) fee and .75% Household Hazardous Waste Charge. The .75% Household Hazardous Waste Charge is currently being segregated into a trust fund and can only be used for the City's Household Hazardous Waste Disposal Page 2 June 15, 2005 program. Assembly Bill 939 is a law that was passed by the State of California that mandates that all cities divert a specified percentage of their solid waste from their landfills in accordance with established deadlines. The AB939 fee has historically been recorded as revenue in the City's General Fund and has only been used for the City's integrated waste management activities. Due to the restrictive nature of the AB939 fee, staff believes it would be more prudent from an accounting standpoint to account for these revenues and related costs in its own separate fund. As such, staff is requesting City Council's authorization to establish a new Integrated Waste Management Fund (Fund 188) to account for AB939 revenues and related expenditures. In order to establish the new fund, staff is requesting a transfer of the June 30, 2004 Integrated Waste Management fund balance held in the City's General Fund to the new Integrated Waste Management Fund. Additionally, staff is requesting the transfer of all AB939 receipts net of Integrated Waste Management expenditures for Fiscal Year 2004/05 to be transferred to the new fund once final revenues have been recorded for the year. At this time, it is estimated that these net revenues will be $246,170; however, this amount is subject to change based on actual revenue and expenditure activity. There is no change in how AB939 funds are utilized. The remaining 10% franchise fee will continue to be reflected as revenue in the City's General Fund to be used to fund ongoing operational activities. Respectfully submitted, Tamara Layne Finance Officer h:~tlayne1City Council staff reportslAB939 fund establishment 06-15-05. doc R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A (~OMMI~NITY ~EDVIC~& DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III ~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES FOR A WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH A FAMILY FUN FEST TO BE HELD AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER ON JULY 6, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from the Quakes to waive rental fees associated with a free Family Fun Fest to be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter on July 6, 2005. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes to hold a free Family Fun Fest at the Epicenter on July 6, 2005. This event would be held in conjunction with Entertainment and Sports International, a nationwide provider of baseball's biggest traveling fan festival. The event is proposed as a pre-game activity to the Quakes' annual Day Care/Day Camp day baseball game at the Epicenter on Wednesday, July 6th. The Quakes ballgame will begin at 1:15 p.m. and the proposed Family Fun Fest will operate between 11:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. This event will allow youngsters attending the Quakes' ballgame to participate in a pre-game "fun zone". The Fun Fest will consist of inflatable games, slides, a video game trailer and a sports museum. The Fun Fest will be set up in parking lot B at the Epicenter ensuring a smooth transition of set-up and tear-down with no interference to the softball fields that will be used later that same day for adult sports activities. As this game is an early afternoon game, the lost of Parking Lot B will not directly impact the Quakes ability to park cars, as attendance is generally under capacity for afternoon games at the Epicenter. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM THE QUAKES FOR A WAIVER OF RENTAL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH A FAMILY FUN FEST AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONG^ EPICENTER ON JULY 6, 2005 JUNE 15, 2005 Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of fees associated with the proposed free youth baseball clinic as the event directly supports the City's intent for the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes to host positive youth programs and events at the Epicenter with character building, anti-drug, anti-gang and pre-education themes for the youngsters of our community. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees associated with this event is approximately $500. Community Services Director Attachment ~:~C~MMSERV~c~unci~&B~rd$~nci~StaffRep~t$t2~5~FeeWaive~uakesFami~yFunFest6~ 15.05. doc -2- May 31, 2005 TO: City Council of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: North Johnson, Rancho Cucamonga Quakes RE: July 6 event at Epicenter On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, the Rancho Cucemonga Quakes are hosting our annual Day Care/Day Camp day game at the Epicenter. Our game will begin at 1:15pm and gives local day cares/camps the opportunity to see our nation's pastime at one of our nation's most beautiful ballparks. In conjunction with this game, we have contracted with Entertainment and Sports International to provide a pre-game '~un zone" for the children in attendance. The fun zone will consist of inflatable games, slides, video game trailer and sports museum. The Fun Zone will be set up in parking Lot B to ensure a smooth transition of set up / break down and no interference of the softball fields. As this is a free event for all who attend, we respectfully request a waiver of the temporary use permit and any fees that might be associated with the event. I may be reached at 909-481-5000 if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued support of the Quakes! Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Professional Baseball Club 8408 Rochester Avenue · P.O. Box 4139 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Administration (909) 481-5000 · Ticket Office (909) 481-5252 · Fax (909) 481-5005 · www. RCQuakes.com Cac,for.~a I. eaSue 9~ff, c~a~e of ~he BriBer, RANCHO C U CA M O N GA COMMUNITY SER¥1CES Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO:. Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services D~r~ctor BY: Rob Bock, Recreation Supervis~~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR MAJOR DIVISION ALL-STAR TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY ALTA LOMA AND CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUES ON JULY 5 - JULY 20, 2005, AT HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council approve a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow use until 11:00 p.m. on the 60' fields at Heritage and Red Hill Parks July 5 - July 20, 2005 (excluding Sundays). Any use after 10:00 p.m. will be limited within those parameters as mentioned below and per the requirements listed in the attached Light Variance Policy. BACKGROUND Traditionally, the Park and Recreation Commission reviews all the light variance requests and forwards their recommendation to the City Council for approval. However, due to the limited time available to consider this request, staff is submitting this request directly to City Council for its consideration. District 21 Little League, on behalf of Alta Loma and Citrus Little Leagues, who is hosting this regional Major All- Star tournament, is requesting this item. The current sports field policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. If a variance to the Light Use Policy is approved, this allows games to continue past 10:00 p.m. because injuries, extra innings, or other reasons have caused the game(s) to last longer than scheduled. Most games will conclude by 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted. The Community Services Department did not receive any complaints during the 2002 - 2004 Little League Ali-Star Competitions held at Heritage and Red Hill Park. CITY COUNCIL LIGHT VARIANCE REQUEST FROM ALTA LOMA AND CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUES June 15, 2005 Page 2 Some of the more important requirements that the little leagues will be bound to are listed within the policy and include, but are not limited to the following: 1. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to the parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. 2. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. Announcing will be limited to: · General welcome · Introduction of teams · Announcement of player to the plate · Recap of runs and score between innings · Play-by-play announcing will not be permitted 3. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, whichever is closer. 4. The P.A. system use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. No lights are permitted on Sunday. ANALYSIS The requested variance would apply specifically to the two diamonds (60' baseball fields) located on the northwest side of Heritage Park and northeast side of Red Hill Park. Staff requests the City Council continue with their current policy of providing curfew variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings, which is necessary for tournament play. Community Services Director Attachment hCOMMSERWCouncil&Boards~ParkRec\StaffRep~005\LightVarianceAItaLomaCit rusLJttleLeagues.061505 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY POLICY NO.: 500-40 PAGE 1 OF 3 EFFECTIVE: 11/1/92 REVISED: January, 2001 APPROVED: 10/18/92 CC SUBJECT: LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PURPOSE: To specify guidelines for the request and use of sports field lights after normal operating hours. POLICY: The following procedures will be followed by all community based youth sports groups who desire to request and use lighted sports fields after normal operating hours. GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: There are some occasions throughout the year that may require a youth sporting event to exceed the normal 10:00 p.m. sports fields' light curfew. However, it is important to develop some procedures that insure that neighboring residents are not negatively impacted by an approved light variance. Outlined below is a set of guidelines that specifies a process for requesting such a variance and how it should be implemented. 1. Non-profit community based youth sports groups may request a variance to extend light use for City park sports fields beyond normal operating hours. Current operating hours conclude at 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and no use of lights is permitted on Sundays. 2. The request must be for a special occasion of some type such as Regional Little League All Star Playoffs, etc. The variance is limited only to games that were scheduled to conclude by 10:00 p.m. but because of injury, extra innings, or other unforeseen circumstances the game was not able to finish in time. Normal league play or practices are not eligible for consideration under this request. 3. A request must be submitted in writing to the Community Services Director two months prior to their requested use. This allows the department to review their request and submit it for review and approval to the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council. 4. The request must then be presented to the Park and Recreation Commission for their review and approval. LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 2 of 3 5. The Park and Recreation Commission must then forward their recommendation to the City Council for their final review and approval. 6. If such a request receives final approval from City Council then that organization must provide home phone numbers and a fact sheet giving details of the tournament. Furthermore, it must be distributed by the leagues or organization to homeowners within two blocks of the parks two weeks before the tournament or event. The flier must be delivered in person to each resident or weighted in some fashion to their doorstep. The flier will include home phone numbers of a district or regional representative and any league presidents. In addition, any pay or designated phones at the fields will also be provided so immediate contact can be obtained with the tournament directors. This will be accomplished at league expense. 7. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. 8. A separate flier will be distributed to league or tournament participants stating that no noisemakers are allowed and that participants/guests are requested to leave the park area quietly. 9. Overflow parking will be monitored by the requesting organization and signage provided directing participants to park at additional parking facilities nearby. Prior approval must be obtained to use these parking facilities. 10. Organized scheduled athletic events sound amplification equipment will be allowed in City parks, but limited to public address systems, stereo equipment, stationary and portable components and bull horns, subject to the following conditions: a.Request to use the Public Address (P.A.) System must be included on the field use application or submitted separately prior to any usage. b. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament or event and a "lock off" device used to prevent the audio from being turned up. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. A fee of $90 will be paid in advance to cover monitoring costs. If additional monitoring is needed, it will be billed at $10.00 an hour. Announcing will be limited to: · General welcome. · Introduction of teams. · Announcement of player to the plate. · Recap of runs and score between innings. c. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the soume or property line, which ever is closer. No sound LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 3 of 3 from a Community Services approved event can exceed a noise level (slow, 74dBA, "A" weighted scale) measured at the nearest property line, for a cumulative period of not more than five (5) minutes in any one hour, whether or not the sounds are live, recorded, amplified or necessary to the event (i.e. generators). d. All users will be responsible for guaranteeing the sound level not exceed 74DBA by installing permanently an automatic control system to be tested and approved by the City prior to the start of the tournament. e. The direction of sound from the P.A. System speakers will be toward spectators and/or bleacher areas and away from residential areas. f. The P.A. System use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. g. Only persons 18 years and older will be allowed to operate the Public Address System. h. All Public Address System use for athletic events must pertain to the game being played. Special announcements should be kept to a minimum. In no case will play-by-play announcing be permitted. i. Failure to comply with the above requirements by user groups will result in one of the following: · First Offense: Verbal warning followed by written communication. · Second Offense: Payment of staff time to monitor sound system at rate set in Music and Amplification Policy at the next set of games. · Third Offense: Loss of system use. 11. Lights are to be turned off as soon as possible after the completion of the last game, but not to exceed 11:00 p.m. I:COMMSE RV',Policies~Policies-App rovedPolicies\LightVadancePolicy.5.4.00 R A N C H O C u c A M 0 N G A CITY M^SAGg~'~ Orricr Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, Ci~ M.~ana~r Pamela S. E .~,"D'bputy City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment ~o the City's Salary Resolution No. 04-313 to include Animal Services Director Classification Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the City's Salary Resolution No. 04-313 to include the new classifications of Animal Services Director at a monthly salary range of $6689 (minimum step) to $9484 (maximum step). Discussion: With the City Council direction to begin the transition from a County contracted operation to a City operated animal services program, it is necessary to proceed with the hiring of an Animal Services Director to assist with the transition as well as to operate the City's program after the transition. The position of Animal Services Director will be a department head position, reporting to the City Manager's Office. After the approval of the salary range by the City Council, staff plans to proceed with the recruitment for the position. THE CITY OF ~ANC~O CUCAHONGA Staff DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Sandra G. Ramirez, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution to Supercede Resolution No. 85-130 which will Amend the List of Officers who are Authorized to Participate in the Local Agency Investment Fund for the City of Rancho Cucamonga RECOMMENDATION: Since inception of the City, Council policy has been to invest funds in the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). Recently, LAIF did an audit and notified the City to update the current list of City officers allowed to participate in investment programs. This City Council Resolution is required to update the list of current City officers from old officers. The updated resolution allows for the change of future officers and no future amendments will be required. The updated resolutions are required for Redevelopment Agency, Fire District and City. BACKGROUND: The City's participation in the Local Agency Investment Fund was approved by the Mayor and Members of the City Council in May 1985 with a limited list of authorized Officers. It is a permitted investment under the authority of Government Code and the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Staff recommends this amendment to the Resolution to update and re-certify current Officers and staff who are authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Deputy Treasurer/Administrative Services Director Attachment: Resolution Treasury \City Staff LAIF 05.doc -2- RESOLUTION NO. 85-130A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LIST OF OFFICERS WHO ARE AUTHORIZED TO ORDER THE DEPOSIT OR WITHDRAWAL OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, Pursuant to Chapter 730 of the Statutes of 1976 Section 16429.1 was added to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein is in the best interests of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Agency Investmem Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information provided in that regard. BE IT FURTItER RESOLVED, that the following officers or their successors in office shall he authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. James C. Frost Tamara L. Layne City Treasurer Finance Officer Jack Lam Lawrence I. Temple City Manager Deputy City Treasurer Sandra G. Ramirez Management Analyst III PASSED APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this 15t~ day of June, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED T H C I T Y O F I~ANCH © CUCAH ONCA $ Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members Of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ SUBJEC'r: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUNGARD BI-TECH INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $88,178 ($32,300 FOR SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES FUNDED OUT OF ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001209-5152; $6,078 FOR FIRST YEAR SUPPORT AND $49,800 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUNDED OUT OF ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001209-5300); AND AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE THREE (3) IBM X SERIES 336 SERVERS FROM IBM CORPORATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000 TO SUPPORT THE SOF-I-VVARE UPGRADE (FUNDED OUT OF ACCOUNT NUMBER 1001209-5605). RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the City Council provide authorization to execute an Addendum to the Software License and Support Agreement between SunGard Bi-Tech Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the total amount of $88,178 ($32,300 for software license fees funded out of account number 1001209-5152; $6,078 for first year support and $49,800 for professional services funded out of account number 1001209-5300); and authorization to purchase three (3) IBM X Series 336 Servers from IBM Corporation in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to support the software upgrade (funded out of account number 1001209- 5605). BACKGROUND In August 1999, the City selected SunGard Bi-Tech's (Bi-Tech) Integrated Fund Accounting System (IFAS) as its software solution for financial, payroll and human resources information technology needs. Periodically, Bi-Tech offers enhancements to its software which incorporate either additional functionality or solutions to programming issues encountered by clients. Typically, these enhancements have been provided to the City at Page 2 June 15, 2005 no additional cost. However, recently Bi-Tech's financial and personnel system was completely redesigned to take advantage of Web functionality. Using Internet Explorer and a PC, all IFAS users at the City would be able to perform their daily tasks using a comfortable and easy-to-use browser-based environment which allows viewing of multiple screens at one time as compared to the current text-based environment which allows for viewing of one screen at a time. The advantages of this new technology are quite numerous, both for the end-users and the technical support staff. Some of the benefits are described below: · Users access IFAS 7i screens via Internet Explorer which is very user-friendly. · Greatly reduced IT management of software updates as upgrades only occur on servers rather than on individual workstations as is currently done. · Greatly enhanced "Find" capabilities with the ability to search on any field, or combination of fields, on every IFAS 7i screen. · Screen consolidation (e.g., entering a purchase requisition would be done via one screen compared to three screens on the current version of the software). · Web and e-mail based Workflow for routing information and approvals throughout the organization electronically. · TimeCard Online which provides for Web-based time entry for payroll. The implementation of IFAS 7i requires the purchase of three (3) servers -one is for the test database, one is for the production database and one is for a backup production database. The backup server for the production database allows staff to have continuous access to the system and avoids interruption of daily business even in the event of a server crash. Since the IFAS 7i software will be residing on the server only, as compared to residing on each workstation under the current version of the software, it is imperative to have a redundant system in the event of any system problems. The IBM X Series 336 Servers requested by staff can only be purchased from IBM Corporation directly. As such, no competitive bidding of this purchase was performed. Implementation of the IFAS 7i upgrade will provide for increased staff productivity and also reduce the labor intensive processes involved when the IT department has to install software updates to all end users of the software. Staff anticipates completing the upgrade during the Fall of 2005. Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director TH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffR port DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Greg Gunski, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FOR GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL FOR FLEET MAINTENANCE AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FROM POMA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., OF SAN BERNARDINO, IN 'AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $270,000 FUNDED FROM FUNDS 1001317-5255 AND 1001317-5256 AND AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $210,000 FUNDED FROM 1001701-5255 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 04/05 AMENDED BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the increase in contract amount for gasoline and diesel fuel for Fleet Maintenance and the Police Department, from Poma Distributing Company, Inc., of San Bernardino, in an annual amount not to exceed $270,000 funded from funds 1001317-5255 and 1001317- 5256 and an annual amount not to exceed $210,000 funded from 1001701-5255 as approved in the FY 04/05 amended budget. BAC KG ROUN D/ANALYSIS On February 5, 2003, the City Council approved the award of a piggyback contract for the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuel from Poma Distributing Company, Inc. for Fleet Maintenance and the Police Department. Since this approval, the cost for fuel has increased by approximately 50%, necessitating an increase in the contract amount. Respectfully submitted, William O. O'Neil City Engineer JO:dlw T H E C I T Y 0 F ]~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RELEASE OF A DEPOSIT AND PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $179,724.09 TO RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC., FOR A DEVELOPER DEPOSIT ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10 AND APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF $179,724.09 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1140303-5650/1026140-0 TO BE FUNDED FROM LMD NO. 10 (FUND 140) FUND BALANCE. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve a reimbursement payment of $179,724.09 to the developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, for the deposit made in February 2002 to cover the initial maintenance costs associated with the formation of LMD No. 10, and approve an appropriation of $179,724.09 to Account No. 1140303- 5650/1026140-0 from LMD No. 10 (Fund 140) fund balance. BACKGROUND: In 2001 staff began the process of forming LMD No. 10, per the request of the developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. This was a request stemming from a large residential development project in an undeveloped portion of the City that was required to cover its own costs in terms of landscape and park maintenance in the public right-of-way areas. A public hearing and election was held on October 3, 2001, which established voter approval for the annexation of the entire development into the newly formed LMD No. 10. A condition of LMD formation is the requirement that the developer make a deposit to the City in an amount that will sufficiently cover six months of the new LMD's Page 2 A Recommendation to Approve a Reimbursement Payment to the Developer for an Initial Deposit made in the Formation of LMD No. 10 operating costs (as assessments are only collected every six months). This deposit is to be released to the developer at such time that enough new assessable units are added to the tax rolls to create a positive cash flow and the required reserves in fund balance. On February 19, 2002 Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC issued a check to the City in the amount of $179,724.09 to cover the initial operating expenses of LMD 10. Staff has examined the fiscal health of LMD No. 10 and determined it to be in good financial condition. Currently, LMD No. 10 has a healthy fund balance of $760,801.67 and is collecting funds sufficient to meet its needs in terms of park and landscape maintenance costs, as well as utility usage. Staff has concluded that a reimbursement payment of $179,724.09 to the developer is appropriate and will not negatively impact LMD 10 operations. Respectfully Submitted, William/ J. O'Neil City Engineer R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A EXGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria Perez, Associate Engineer ', k:'"~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technicianf¢~ SUBJECT: REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE AS NON- RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AND APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE RE-ADVERTISING OF THE "NQTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11803035650/1472180-0 AND 12083035650/1472208-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reject all bids received for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route as non-responsive to the needs of the City and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the City Clerk to re-advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 24, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $419,545.00. All bids received significantly exceeded the Engineer's Estimate and budgeted amount. The consfruction of this project included a portion of work in the City of Upland with the understanding the City of Upland would fund that portion of the work. The bid item of crossing conduits for future under-grounding within the intersection of Arrow and Grove, for the Upland portion, was disproportionately high. Upland has chosen to re-evaluate how to establish the under-grounding at a later date without impacting Rancho Cucamonga streets. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route June 15, 2005 Page 2 Staff intends to re-bid the project. The plans have been revised to delete the item of concern. Respectfully submitte.d, Willia[n/J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MP/RO:Is Attachments BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 /IPPARENT LOW BIDDER Grove Avenue Street Improvements ENGINEERS COST Laird Construction Co. Sully-Miller Contracting from 8th Street to Arrow Route ESTIMATE Inc. Company R.J. Noble Company UNIT] UNIT I UNITI UNITI NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST ~ AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS 2.1earing&Grubbing $15,000.00[ $15,000.00 $9,$66.5ol $9,866.50 $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $27,000.00! $27,000.00 2.7239C SF RemoveA.CPavement, includingACbermandsawcutti~ $0.501 $36,195.00 $0.501 $36,195.00 $0.251 $18,097.50 $0.421 $30,403.80 3. 4i EA RemoveTree $500.001 $2,000.00 $250.00[ $i,000.00 $200.001 $800.00 $190.001 $760.00 4. 3 EA Relocate Mailbox $80.001 $240.00 $250.001 $750.00 $200.001$600.00 $240.001 $720.00 5. LS Remove existing pipes on private property. Pipesmaybe $8,000.001 $8,000.00 $7,500.001 $7,500.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $16,400.001 $16,400.00 6 1440 CY Unclassified Excavafion (F) $15.00] $21,600.00 $3o.ool $43,200.00 $32.ooI $46,080.00 $29.ool $41,760.00 7 2400 TON Construct 6" Crushed Aggregate Base $18.ool $43,200.00 $23.50 $56,400.00 $27.ool $64,800.00 $21.00! $50,400.00 8 2200 TON ConstructAsphaltConcretePavement $45.00r $99,000.00 $45.00 $99,000.00 $52.ooI$114,400.00 $51.6oI $113,520.00 9. 1000 TON Asphalt Concrete Overlay, including crack seal and weed $45.00 $45,000.00 $45.001 $45,000.00 $52.001 $52,000.00 $54.501 $54,500.00 10. 2850 SY Variable Cold Plane 0' - 0.10' $2.50 $7,125.00 $3.001 $8,550.00 $1.751 $4,987.50 $3.401 $9,690.00 11. 3800 SY install Pavement Reinforcing Fabric. Including Tack Coat $1.401 $5,320.00 $1.00 $3,800.00 $1.00 $3,800.00 $1.061 $4,028.00 12. 16 IEA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $400.00 $6,400.00 $265.00 $4,240.00 $350.00 $5,600.00 $300.001 $4,800.00 13. 14 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $200.00 $2,800.00 $50.001 $700.00 $150.00 $2,100.00 $32.001 $448.00 14. I EA Adjust Storm Drain Manhole to Grade $500.00J $500.00 $265.001 $265.00 $350.001 $350.00 $3oo.ool $300.00 15. 160 SF Grouted Rock Rip Rap $10.00 $1,600.00 $15.00 $2,400.00 $11.001 $1,760.00 $4.8ol $768.00 16. I EA Construct Uodersidewalk Drain $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $4,500.001 $4,500.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00 17. 360 LF Construct 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter, including removal r $20.001 $7,200.00 $27.50 $9,900.00 $26.00 $9,360.00 $31.50 $11,340.00 18. 185 LF Construct 6' P.C.C. Curb & 18" Gutter, including removal i $18.001 $3,330.00 $30.001 $5,550.00 $25.00 $4,625.00 $31.50 $5,827.50 19. 720 SF Construct 6' P.C.C. Driveway Approach, including remora $7.001 $5,040.00 $6.50 $4,680.00 $8.00 $5,760.00 $9.20 $6,624.00 20. 2430 SF ConstructS" P.C.C. DdvewayApproach, including remora $9.ool $21,870.00 $7.50 $18,225.00 $8.001 $19,440.00 $7.90 $19,197.00 21. 1050 SF Construct 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $4.001 $4,200.00 $5.251$5,512.50 $6.001 $6,300.00 $8.20 $8,610.00 22. 185 SF Construct P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $7.001 $1,295.0(3 $10.001 $1,850.00 $8.001 $1,480.00 $7.10 $1,313.50 23. 2070 SF Construct P.C.C. Cross Gutter& Spandrels $9.ool $18,630.0(~ $9.50 $19,665.00 $9.ool $18,630.00 $9.20 $19,044.00 24. 250 LF .~onstruct Retaining Curbs $20.00 $5,000.00 $25.00 $6,250.01: $23.00 $5,750.00 $20.00 $5,000.00 25. 2 EA ~,djust Water Meter Box to Grade $150.00 $300.00 $125.001 $250.01: $150.00 $300.01: ' $215.00 $430.00 26. 39 EA Replace lnducfive Loop Detectors $300.00 $11,700.00 $200.001 $7,800.01: $225.00 $8,775.0(: $200.00 $7,800.00 27. LS Restore Landscape and Irrigation System $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.0(3 $2,500.001 $2,500.0(3 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 28. LS TralficStripingandSigns, including removal of existing $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $8,250.00[ $8,250.00 $8,500.001 $8,500.0(3 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 29 LS Traffic control $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.001 $25,000.0(3 $31,905.00] $31,905.0(3 $12,895.20 $12,895.20 30. 4 EA Construction Notification Sign $500.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $2,000.0(3 $450.00[ $1,800.0(3 $480.00 $1,920.00 3 I. LS SWPPP $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $3,000.0G $3,000.06 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 32. 1 LS Construct Edison, Verizon andAdelphia Conduitscrossim $7,000.001 $7,000.00 $53,5oo.ool $53,5oo.oo $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $56,400.00 $56,400.00 ~ Page 1 TOT3~L I $419,545.00 $495,549.00 I $498,000.00 $531,999.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 Grove Aveime Street Improvements Hillcrest Contracting, Vance Corporatioo from 8th Street to Arrow Route Gentry Brothers, Inc. All American Asphalt Inc. UNIT ! UNIT ~ UNIT I UNIT i NO I QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST i AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST ] AMOUNT t. t LS C,e~ring&Grubb~r,g $76,'95.001 $76,195.00 $16,700.001 $16,700.0G $48,ooo.ool $48,000.0G $15,000.00! $15,000.00; 2.7239( SF RemoveA.C. Pavement, including AC berm and sawcuttir $0.501 $36,195.00 $0.701 $50,673.00 $0.551 $39,814.50 $0.401 $28,956.0£ 3. 4 EA RemoveTree $500.00J $2,000.00 $188.00! $752.00 $190.001 $760.00 $750.001 $3,000.00 4. 3 EA Relocate Mailbox $100.001 $300.00 $100.00r $300.00 $100.001 $300.00 $250.001 $7S0.00 5. I LS Remove existing pipes on prJvate property. Pipes may be ; $5,000.001 $5,000.0C $16,ooo.ooj $16,000.00 $10,000.00i $10,000.00 $7,500.00J $7,500.00 6. 1440 C¥ Unclassified Excavation (F) $4o.ooI $57,600.00 $33.001 $47,520.00 $28.00 $40,320.00 *30.001 $43,200.06 7. 2400 TON 0onstruct6" Crushed Aggregate Base $20.001 $48,000.00 $19.50 $46,800.00 $25.00 $60,000.00 $24.001 $5?,600.00 8. 2200 TON 3onstruct Asphalt Concrete Pavement $43.001 $94,600.00 $46.00 $101,200.00 $48.50! $106,700.00 $46.00 $101,200.00 9. 1000 TON ~,sphalt Concrete Overlay, including crack seal and weed l $43.00 $43,000.00 $49.ool $49,000.00 $47.001 $47,000.00 $46.00 $46,000.00 10. 2850 SY Cariable Cold Plane 0' - 0.10' $2.512 $7,125.00 $2.65 $7,552.50 $2.80 $7,980.00 $4.00 $11,400.00 11. 3800 SY nstall Pavement Reinforcing Fabric. Including Tack Coat $1.00 $3,800.00 $0.70 $2,660.00 $1.10 $4,180.00 $1.50 $5,700.00 12. 16 EA ~,djust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $300.00 $4,800.00 $325.001 $5,200.00 $375.001 $6,000.00 $600.00 $9,600.00 13. 14 EA ~,djust Water Valve 8ox & Cover to Finish Grade $25.001 $350.00 $200.00 $2,800.00 $75.001 $1,050.00 $100.001 $1,400.00 14. EA ~,djust Storm Drain Manhole to Grade $300.001 $300.00 $325.00 $325.00 $3?5.00 $375.00 $600.001 $600.00 15. 160 SF Grouted Rock Rip Rap $10.001 $1,600.00 $16.501 $2,640.00 $12.00 $1,920.00 $20.001 $3,200.00 16. EA Construct Undersidewalk Drain $1,800.001 $1,800.00 $4,700.00[ $4,700.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.00 17. 360 LF Construct 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24' Gutter, including removal $25.00 $9,000.00 $28.00 $10,080.00 $26.ool $9,360.00 $45.ool $16,200.00 18. 185 LF Cons ruct 6" P.C.C. Curb & 18' Gutter, including removal $25.00 $4,625.00 $28.00 $5,180.00 $25.001 $4,625.00 $40.001 $7,400.00 19. 720 SF Construct 6" P.C.C. Dd','ewa¥ Approach, including remov~ $6.001 $4,320.00 $7.701 $5,544.00 $8.001 $5,760.00 $10.00[ $7,200.00 20. 2430 SF Construct 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach, includingremow $6.501 $I5,795.00 $10.40 $25,272.00 $9.001 $21,870.00 $12.001 $29,160.00 21. 1050 SF Construct 4" P.C.C Sidewalk $4.001 $4,200.00 $5.15 $5,40?.50 $6.501 $6,825.00 $6.501 $6,825.00 22. 185 SF Construct P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $8.00 $1,480.00 $7.75 $1,433.75 $8.501 $1,572.50 $15.001 $2,7?5.00 23. 2070 SF ConstructP.C.C. Cross Gutter & Spandrels $6.50 $13,455.00 $10.401 $21,528.00 $9.501 $19,665.00 $12.001 $24,840.00 24. 250 LF Construct Retaining Curbs $16.001 $4,000.00 $21.00 $5,250.00 $20.00 $5,000.00 $25.00 $6,250.00 25. 2 EA Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade $50.001 $100.00 $250.00 $500.00 $130.00 $260.00 $250.00 $500.00 26. 39 EA ReplacelnductiveLoopOetectors $240.001 $9,360.00 $172.001 $6,?08.00 $195.001 $7,605.00 $250.00 $9,750.00 27. 1 LS Restore Landscape and Irrigation System $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 28. I LS Traffic Striping and Signs, including removal of existing $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 29. 1 LS Traffic control $20,000.001 $20,000.00 $18,500.00 $18,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $80,669.00 $80,669.00 30. 4 EA Construction Notification Sign $450.00 $1,800.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $750.001 $3,000.00 $600.00 $2,400.00 31. I LS SWPPP $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 32. 1 LS Construct Edison, VerizonandAdelphiaConduitscrossinc $55,000.001 $55,000.00 $62,000.00 $62,000.00 $60,000.001 $60,000.00 $24,000.00! $24,000.00 I I I ~ Page 2 TOT,,&[, I $546,300.00 $547,225.75 [ $552,442.00 I $575,575.00 VICINITY MAP GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TH ST. TO ARROW RTE. AND SAN BERNARDINO RD. CROSS GUTTER FROM GROVE AVE. TO APPROX. 100' E/O GROVE AVE. PROJECT LOCATION Almond Rd -- Banyan ' : Route 30 19th; hland Av RESOLUT,ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RE-ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements, which were approved at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 20, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the plans and specifications for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive, at the Office of the City Clerk, in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m., on Tuesday, July 12, 2005, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. RESOLUTION NO. June 15, 2005 Page 2 ,. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. RESOLUTION NO. June 15, 2005 Page 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract RESOLUTION NO. June 15, 2005 Page 4 which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" may be directed to: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4036. RESOLUTION NO. June 15, 2005 Page 5 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 15th day of June, 2005 Publish Dates: June 21, 2005 and June 28, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 15th day of June, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor A~I-EST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15~h day of June, 2005. Executed this 15th day of June, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: June 21,2005 and June 28, 2005 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ N G I N I~I~ ~ I N G D £ PA P TFI[ N T Staff Report DA[E: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR AWARD AND EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,760.00 TO AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,976.00, FOR THE UPDATE OF THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN AND FEES UPDATE, TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 001 -GENERAL FUND, ACCOUNT NO. I 001 305 5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve an award and execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $79,760 to AKM Consulting Engineers, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,976 for the update of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Master Plan and Fees Update. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1989 the City last updated the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Master Plan. That update consolidated various independent studies into one concise report. That report addressed not only the City's master plan drainage facilities, but, for the first time, incorporated county maintained Secondary Regional and Regional Mainline facilities into the review, and the drainage and fiscal impact those county facilities would have on properties within Rancho Cucamonga. The adoption in 1989 of that Master Plan established a mechanism to identify required drainage improvements, which would allow development to occur within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area, as well as a method of funding and constructing those needed improvements. Since the adoption of that master plan sixteen years ago there have been periodic updates to the drainage fee amount to keep up with inflation. There has also been a minor adjustment to the drainage areas to reflect changed conditions. However, during the last sixteen years there has been a substantial development and redevelopment within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage area. This development activity has prompted the need to update the Master Plan of Drainage ;'7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE June 15, 2005 Page 2 within that area. This study will consolidate the individual hydrology studies created in the past as well as the drainage improvements constructed by development, the City, and the County. It will identify what drainage improvements are still necessary to allow development to continue and it will recreate a nexus relating all improvements within the area, to their corresponding benefit to these properties within that area. This nexus will identify and recommend a revised fee structure for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine area. Respectfully submitted, Will j/am J. O Nell City Engineer W JO: WCS VICINITY MAP Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Master Plan 17 A N C H O C U C A ~ O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTFIENT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech~ician.,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,352.50 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, ATHLETIC FIELD SPECIALISTS INC., FOR THE BASE BID AND ADDITIVE BID OF THEIR PROPOSAL, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,735.25 FOR THE RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK, TO BE FUNDED FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11203055650/1222120-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $37,352.50 to the apparent Iow bidder, Athletic Field Specialists Inc., for the Base Bid and Additive Bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,735.25, for the Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from Park Development funds, Account No. 11203055650/1222120-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 24, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $40,910.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Award the Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park Pr~ect June 15, 2005 Page 2 The construction of this project is to re-grade and re-sod two Red Hill Community Park baseball fields at the infield/outfield interface. The contract documents call for twenty (20) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JD/R©:Is Attachment BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 Appareut Low Bidder RENOVATION OF TWO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL ENGINEERS COST Athletic Field Specialists TruGreen LandCare, Belaire West COMMUNITY PARK ESTIMATE Inc. Branch 6169 Landscaping, Inc. UNITI UNIT] UNIT] UNITI NOI QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Irrigation Work (remove and reinstall) ] $1,000.001 $1,000.013 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 $3~000.00[ $3,000.00 2. 15950 SF Turf Removal I $0.501 $7~975.0(3 $0.451 $7~177.50 $0.501 $7,975.00 3. 17175 SF Brick Dust Grading I $0.40 $6~870.0~ $0.251 $4~293.75 $0.24 $4~122.00 4. 16120 SF New Grass (Sod) I $0.50 $8~060.013 $1.251 $20,150.00 $1.00 $16,120.00 5. 53 CY New Brick Dust I $75.001 $3,975.00 $50.001 $2~650.00 $150.001 $7,950.00 TOTAL BASE BID I $33,803.00 I $27,880.00 [ $35,271.25: I $391167.00 ADDITIVE BID ( Little League Baseball Field Renovation I I I [ 6. LS Irrigation Work (remove and reinstall) I $2~000.00 $2~000.00 $500.001 $500.0C $2~000.001 $2~000.00 7. 2375 SF turf Removal I $0.501 $I~187.50 $0.45 $1~068.75 $0.52 $1~235.00 8. 742 SF Brick Dust Grading $0.40 $2~970.00 $0.25 $1~856.25 $0.24 $1~782.00 9. 318C SF New Grass (Sod) $0.50 $1,590.00 $1.251 $3,975.0C $1.00 $3,180.00 10. 23 CY New Brick Dust $75.001 $1~725.00 $50.001 $1,150.013 $150.001 $3~450.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE BID I $61924'00 I $9~472.50 I $8~550.013I $11;647.00 TOTAL BASE AND ADDITIVE BID I $401727.00 $37~352.50 I $43,821.25 I $50,814~00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 RENOVATION OF TWO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL America West Mariposa Horticulture Enterprises, COMMUNITY PARK Landscape, Inc. Inc. Mega Lighting, Inc. UNIT UNIT[ BID ~ORRECTE[ UNITI NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT I AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT 1. 1 LS Irrigation Work (remove aud reinstall) $8~028.78 $8,028.78 $1,783.001 $1~783.00 $1~783.00 $28~000.001 $28~000.00 $28~000.00 2. 15950 SF Turf Removal $0.47 $7~496.50 $1.27 $20~256.50 $20~256.50 $1.001 $15,950.001 $15,950.00 3. 17175 SF Brick Dust Grading $0.23 $3~950.25 $0.75 $12,881.251 $12~881.25 $0.251 $4,293.751 $4~293.75 4. 16120 SF New Grass (Sod) $1.131 $18,215.60 $1.101 $17,732.001 $17~732.00 $1.00 $16,120.00 $16,120.00 5. 53 CY New Brick Dust $166.831 $8~841.99 $201.001 $10~653.001 $I0~653.00 $90.00 $4,770.00 $4,770.00 TOTAL BASE BID I $46,533.12 I $62'808'551 $63,305.75 I $69,133,001 $69,133.75 I ~ ADDITIVE BID ( Little League Baseball Field Renovation) I [ I I I 6. 1 LS Irrigation Work(remove and reinstall) $8~028.78 $8~028.78 $950.00 $950.00[ $950.0C $50~000.001 $50~000.00 $50~000.0C 7. 2375 SF Turf Removal $0.47 $1~116.25 $2.98 $7~077.50 $7~077.5C $1.101 $2~612.50 $2~612.513 8. 7425 SF Brick Dust Grading $0.23 $1~707.75 $0.631 $4~677.75 $4,677.75 $0.60 $4~455.001 $4~455.013 9. 3180 SF New Grass (Sod) $1.13 $3~593.4C $1.14 $3~625.20 $3~625.213 $1.10 $3~498.00 $3~498.0G 10. 23 CY New Brick Dust $166.831 $3~837.09 $205.00 $4~715.00 $4~715.0G $150.001 $3~450.00 $3~450.013 ~ TOTAL ADDITIVE BID I $18,283.27 $21,045.45 $21,045.45 $64 015.50i $64,015.513 · '~ I [ I $133,148.50[ ['~'~ Sheet 1 TOTAL BASE AND ADDITIVE BID I $64~816.39 $83,854.001 $84~351.20 $133~149.25 ~T~ ~T NTS ~TM 5T ONTAP-.IO CITY LIMIT P'P-,,OJ ECT LOCATION CITY OF RANCHO CUC~MONGA RED HILL column' lln: ~/"~h~ ~ R~NOVATION OF ~0 ~ ~S ~CINI~ ~ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ N G IN l~l~ D IN G DI Vi &ION StaffR port DATE: June 15, '2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FOOTHILL CROSSING, LLC, AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE PRICE AND APPROPRIATE $6,532,579.50 (PURCHASE PRICE) TO ACCOUNT NO. 266080'15650/1360-660-6312 FROM THE 2004 TAB BOND PROCEEDS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Agreement, and authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the Purchase and Sale of Real Property between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Foothill Crossing, LLC, authorize the expenditure of funds for the purchase price and appropriate $6,535,579.50 (purchase price) to Account No. 26608015650/1360-660-6312 from the 2004 TAB Bond Proceeds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The real property is being secured at this time for right-of-way for the future interchange improvements at the 1-15 Freeway and Arrow Route. The City and Foothill Crossing have come to' terms on the sale of the real property. The City is acquiring two parcels of land on Day Creek Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard. The agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. A similar item appears on the Redevelopment Agency agenda, Re~,ectfu~ly submitted, Willi~'a/~Neil~fl~/~ City Engineer WJO:JAD:fs Attachments: Vicinity Map RIGHT-OF-WAY AQUI$ITION, 1-15 FREE~AY INTERCHANGE AT ARROW RT. 24TH ST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E~GINEERING DEPARTHENT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO- Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer . BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~'X~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,084,279.00 TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $108,427.90 FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM GENERAL ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 10013075650/1506001-0 AND APPROPRIATE AND ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $200,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 10013075650/1506001-0 FROM GENERAL ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, except that submitted by Sequel Contractors, Inc. as non-responsive to the needs of the City, and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,084,279.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, H & H General Contractors, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $108,427.90, for the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from General Engineering Project Management funds, Account No. 10013075650/1506001-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $200,000.00 to Account No. 10013075650/1506001-0 from General Engineering Project Management fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 24, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $1,320,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements, except that submitted by Sequel Contractors which contained a unit price error. Sequel Contractors contacted City staff after bids were opened to report they had made a unit price error and requested they be allowed to CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Award the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue June 15, 2005 Page 2 withdraw their bid. This request was made in writing within five days of the bid opening as required in Section 5100-5107 of the California Public Contract Code. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The Foothill Boulevard portion of this project is to install curb and gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay and storm drain improvements; cold milling, adjusting utilities to new grade, replacing traffic signal detector loops and striping. The Devon Avenue and Archibald Avenue portion is to install asphalt concrete pavement and asphalt rubber hot mix overlay; cold milling, adjusting utilities to new grade, replacing cross gutter and striping. The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, Will~am O. O Nell City Engineer WJO:CH/RQ:Is Attachment ?? BID SUM[MARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 Bid Withdrawn Lowest Responsible Bidder Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement ENGINEERS COST H & H General Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue ESTIMATE Sequel Contractors, Inc. Contractors, Inc. KZC Construction, Inc. UNITi UNITi UNIT [ UNIT l NO QTY UNIT ~DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST ! AMOUNT COST ] AMOUNT I. LS Clearing and Grubbing, includes all removals, unclassified; $25,000.001 $25,000.00 $15,000.00i $15,000.00 $151,000.001 $151,000.00 $63,891.00] $63,891.00 2. EA Remove existing 60-inch tree, including roots and stump $5,000.00] $5,000.00 $2,000.001 $2,000.00 $2,160.00] $2,160.00 $7,290.00! $7,290.00 3. 1190 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pavement prei $65.00[ $77,350.00 $57.00! $67,830.00 $58.00i $69,020.00 $80.001 $95,200.00 4. 1430C SY ColdPlane, 0.12'Deep $3.o0l$42,900.00 $1.19] $17,017.00 $1.301 $18,590.00 $1.46! $20,878.00 5. 48C TONS Asphalt Concrete Pavement (indudes all removals and s $50.00] $24,000.00 $130.001 $62,400.00 $94.00[ $45,120.0C $69.00i $33,120.00 6' 2 EA Catch Bas'n W=28 , including local depress on $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $10,000.00] $20,000.00 $6,816.00[ $13,632.0C $9,477.00] $18,954.00 7 130 SF Construct local deppression only, per City of Rancho Cuc~ $15.00 $1,950.00 sic.col $1,300.00 $21.5oI $2,795.00 $1o.3oI $1,339.00 8. 4 EA Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $500.00! $2,000.00 $1,000.00] $4,000.00 $654.00] $2,616.00 $729.001 $2,916.00 9. 6 EA Junction Structure No 2 $6,ooo.ool $36,000.00 $3,700.00] $22,200.00 $I,2OO.OO] $7,200.00 $2,059.00 $12,354.00 10. 5 EA ManholeNo. 2 $10,000.001 $50,000.00 $7,000.00 $35,000.00 $3,400.001 $17,000.00 $5,346.00 $26,730.00 11. 1 EA Manhole No. 4 $10,000.00] $10,000.00 $6,800.00 $6,800.00 $5,160.001 $5,160.00 $6,986.00 $6,986.00 12. 4 EA Breakinintoexistingcatchbasinormanhole, andjoin, ren $2,000.00] $8,000.00 $3,100.001 $12,400.00 $1,?I0.001 $6,840.00 $2,430.001 $9,720.00 13. I LS Remove interfering portions of existing storm drain pipe or $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $3,200.001 $3,200.00 $14,000.001 $14,000.00 $35,500.001 $35,500.00 14. 350 LF Sawcut, remove and Construct curb and gutter per City of $35.001 $12,250.00 · $20.001 $7,000.00 $52.00 $18,200.00 $26.701 $9,345.00 15. 2500 SF Sawcut, romove and replace cross~utter and spandrel pe $37,500.00 $9.00 $22,500.00 $10.00 $25,000.00 $10.301 $25,750.00 16. 1 LS Bracing or Shoring 17. 912 LF 84"RCP(1800D) $600.00 $547,200.00 $38o.ool $346,560.00 $390.001 $355,680.00 $475.001 $433,200.00 18. 487 LF 72'RCP(1500D) $500.001 $243,500.00 $300.00 $146,100.00 $404.001 $196,748.00 $436.00 $212,332.00 19. 4 LF 48" RCP (1500D) $400.00] $1,600.00 $4,000.00 $16,000.00 $75o.ool $3,000.00 $349.00 $1,396.00 20. 86 LF 36"RCP(1500D) $300.001 $25,800.00 $250.00 $21,500.00 $308.00 $26,488.00 $212.001 $18,232.00 21. 130 LF 24'RCP(1500D&2000D) $250.001$32,500.00 $150.00 $19,500.00 $206.00 $26,780.00 $142.00[ $18,460.00 22. 1 EA .3onstruct concrete collar per City of Rancho Cucamonga: $1,000.00] $1,000.00 $900.00] $900.00 $720.001 $720.00 $1,215.001 $1,215.00 23. 16 EA .%nstruct support for conduits across trenches per City of $500.00[ $8,000.00 $150.00] $2,400.00 $300.00] $4,800.00 $1,215.001 $19,440.00 24. 18 CY :ill all existing CMP pipe with concrete slurry, 1 sack, to th $250.00[ S4,500.00 $2o7.ooI $3,726.00 $80.00 $1,440.00 $121.50 $2,187.00 25. 2 EA Construct concrete blanket protection per City of Rancho ( $500.00 $1,000.00 $450.00 $900.00 $720.00 $1,440.00 $1,215.00 $2,430.00 26. EA Cons ruc p pe c osure, Type "A" per S.B.C.F.CD. Std. PI $500.00 $500.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $72o.ool $720.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 27. LS Pothole all existing utilities crossing pro~osed storm drain$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $13,680.001 $13,680.00 $13,365.00 $13,365.00 28. 10 EA Install inductive Iccp detectors, complete in place $350.00 $3,500.0C $210.00 $2,100.00 $347.001 $3,470.00 $365.00 $3,650.00 29' LS Traffic Signing, Striping aad Pavement Markings, perplan, $10,000.00 $10,000.0C $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,250.001 $8,250.00 $10,325.00 $10,325.00 30. LS Traffic Control, including1300'+ofK-Rail $20,000.00 $20,000.0C $1o,496.ooI $10,496.00 $22,200.00] $22,200.00 $15,795.00 $15,795.00 31. LS SWPPP $10,000.00] $10,000.00 $7,500.00 $?,500.00 $10,680.00[ $10,680.00 $6,000.00] $6,000.00 ~3~ Page 1 TOTAL ]$1,320,000.00 $893,729.0C 151,084,279.00 $1,143,000.0~ oca , BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue CCI Construction, Inc. Garcia Juarez Steve Bubalo Construction Construction Inc. Co. KEC Engineeriog UNIT I UNIT I UNIT ~ UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT COST ! AMOUNT 1. LS Clearing and Grubbing, includes allremovals, unclassified:$80,000.001 $80,000.00 $5,000.001 $5,000.00 $100,000.001 $100,000.00 $76,000.00i $76,000.0C 2. EA Remove existing 60-inch tree, including roots and stump $1,500.001 $1,500.00 $1,000.00[ $1,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $3,400.001 $3,400.00 3..__.2 119.___0 TON____~S Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pavement prep $72.001 $85,680.00 $75.001 $89,250.00 $80.00] $95,200.00 $78.00l $92,820.00 4. 14300 SY ColdP , ~ . ~~ lane, 0.12 Deep $1.401 $20,020.00 $1.301 $18,590.00 $1.20[ $17,160.00 $1.50T $21,450.00 5.~ 48_____0 TON..___~S Asphalt Concrete Pavement (includes all removals and sa~ $90.001 $43,200.00 $70.00~ $120.001 $57,600.00 $100.00J $48,000.00 6. 2 E._.._~A 3atchBasinW=28',indudinglocaldepressioa $125 $24,000.00 $6,000.00] $12,000.00 $8,500.001 $17,000.00 $9,700.00[ $19,400.00 7~ 13.____0 S~F :onstruct local deppression only, per City of Rancho Cu~ $22.001 $2,860.00 $12.00] $1,560.00 $12.001 $1,560.O0 $18.00[ $2,340.00 8. 4 E..__~.__A ' Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $450.00J $1,800.0C $1,000.001 $4,000.00 ~ $3,200.00 $1,100.001 $4,400.00 9~ ~ E.._~_A Junction Structure No. 2 $4,000.00'5 $24,000.00 $2,000.00[ $12,000.00 $1,500.001 $9,000.00 $1,700.001 $10,200.00 10.5 EA MaoholeNo. 2 $6,000.00[ $30,000.00 $6,000.001 $30,000.00 $6,ooo.oo[$30,000.00 $4,550.00 $22,750.00 11__._; ____1 E..__~AManhole No. 4 $7,000.00~.00 *5,000.00~ $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $6,'---~00.0-~ $'---~6,400.00 I2~ 4 EA Breakinintoexistingcatchbasinormanhole, andjotn, rerr $8,000.001 $32,000.00 $2,000.00~.0C $2,0~ $1,800.0'~--~'~ $7,200. 13_~ ~1 L.__~__S Remove intedering portions of existing storm drain pipe or ~ $5,~ $2,500.001 $2,500.00 $34,800.00] $34,800.0C 14..~ 35~0 L~F Sawcut, remove and Construct curb and gutter per City of $44.001 $15,400.00 $30.00J $10,500.00 $40.00[ $14,000.00 $36.001 $12,600.O0 15.~ 250~0 S._..__~_F 3awcut, remove and replace cross~utter and spandrel pe~ $11.00~ $12.00 $30,000.00 $12.00 $30,000.00 $10.001 $25,000.O0 16~__ L.._.~_S ~racing or Shoring $10,000.00~ $220,000.0'-~"--'~~ $25,000.0"~"~ $25,000.00 $15,300.00[ $15,300.00 17..~d 91~2 LF 84"RCP(1800D) $550.001 $501,600.00 $525.00[ $478,800.00 ~ $500.0~ $456,000.00 18. 487 LF 72" RCP (1500D) "~'- ~ ~~ --~--~ ~ $475.00 $231,325.00~ $465.00 $226,455.00 19.4 LF 48" RCP (1500D) ~~ ~~ -- -- -- ~ ~ SS00.00 $2,000.00 ~0 $940.00 $3,760.00 21.130 LF 24" RCP (1500D & 2000D) -- i E^ Construclconoroteoo,arperC lyo, Rancho0uoamongsl $1,000.001 23~ 16 EA 3onstruct support for conduits across trenches per City of $1,000.00[ $16,000.00 $1,000.001 $16,000.00~~ 24. 18 CY =itl all existing CMP pipe with concrete slurry, 1 sack, to th $550.001 $9,900.00 ~ $2oo.ooj $3,600.00 -- -- -- $1,000.0~0 $2,000.0~0 ~ $1,940.0~0 $3,880.0~ 26. Eh Construct pipe dosure, Type"A' perS.B.C.F.C.D. Std P ~ $1,500.00,[$l,500.00 .............. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 27~ ~1 L.._._~_S Pothole all existing utilities crossing proposed storm drain $8,800.001 $8,800.0C ~ $7,500.001 $7,500.0C ~ lO E^ $500.0-----; 29~ ~1 L~S Traff~Sigeing~ment Markings,perplan $4,700.00 $4,700.00 ~ $5,000.0"~"~---~ $5,000.0'"~'--'--~ ~0 30. I LS Traffic Control, including 1300' +of K-Rail ~ --~-- $30,000.00J $30,000.00 $15,000.00J $15,000.00 $7,500.00[ $7,500.00~ $3,ooo.ool $3,ooo.o BID S MMAR¥ FOR BID OPENING MAY 24, 2005 ~ Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabili ation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue Beador Construction Company, Inc. Gentry Brothers, Inc. UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT BID [ CORRECTED NO QTY DESCRIPTION COST ! AMOUNT AMOUNT COS~T AMOUNT ] AMOUN~T I. I Clearing and Grubbing, includes a removals, unclassifie, $8,900.00[ $8,900.00 $~ $449,000.00 $449,OOO.OOI $449,000.00 2. 1 Remove existing 60-inch tree, including roots and stump $3,000.00[ $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,ooo.--'-----oo $3,ooo.ool 3. 1190 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay, including pavement$85,oor$101,150.00 $101,150.00 $70.0'-~'~'~' $83,300.00r $83,300.00 4. I4300 3old Plane, 0.12' Deep $1.20[ $17,160.00 ~ $2.0'~0 $28,600.001 ~ 5. 48C (includes all removats and s $130.00r $62,400.00 $62,400.06 $75.00$36,ooo.oor 6 2 Catch Basin =28, ncludlng ocal depress on $14,700.00[ $29,400.00 ~ $10,000.00 $20,000.001 $~ W ' ~ $36,000.00 7. 130 Construct local deppression only, per City of Rancho C~ $23.00r $2,990.00 $2,990.00 ~ $1,040'~'~'~00 [ $1,040.00 8. 4 Monolithic Catch Basin Connection $1,200.001 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $700.00$2,8oo.oor$2,800.0C 9. 6 Junction Structure No. 2 ~ $ l 0,800.0~ $1,600.0'~"'-'"~ $9,6oo, $9,600.00 10. 5 Manhole Nc. 2 $4,700.00 $23,500.00 $23,500.00 $ 7,000.0'~'---~'-~ 1l. Vlanhole No. 4 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 ~~~ ~ ~ $10,000.00[ $10,000.00 12. 4 3reakin into existing catch basin or manhole, and join, $2,350.001 $9,400.00 $9,400.00 $3,800.00 $15,200.001 ~ 13. Remove interfering portions of existing storm drain $1,175.001 $1,175.00 $1,175.0C $10,000.0'-~-~ ~ 14~ 35.0_ Sawcut, remove and Construct curb and gutter per Ci $44.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $30.-l~0~$1o,5oo.oor $1o,5oo.oo 15. 2500 Sawcut, remove and re¢ace cross~3utter and spandrel $15.00 $'~37,500.00~ ~ $25,000~001 $25,000.00 16. I Bracing or Shodng $6,000.00] $6,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00~ 17. 912 84" RCP (1800D) $700.00 18. 487 72"RCP(1500D) $490.00 $446,880.001 $446,880.0(3 19. 4 ~,8" RCP (1500D) $411.00 $1,644.001 $1,644.00 $290.'--'--'~--~0 $1,160.001 $~ 20 86 36' RCP (1500D) $27,606.00] $27,606.00 $ 240.-'"~"~0 $8,640.001 $20,640.00 21. 130 24" RCP (1500D & 2000D) $217.O01 $28,210.001 $28,2lO.00 $200~.06 $26,~ 22. 1 ~lar per City of Rancho Cucamonga $2,350.001 $2,350.00] ~ $700.'----"~'~0 $700.0~ 23. 16 Construct suppor[ for conduits across trenches $18,800.00 $1,800.'--"'~--~0 24. 18 Fill all existing CMP pipe with concrete slurp $650.0 $11,700.00 ~ $400.00] $7,200.001 $7,200.00 25. 2 Construct concrete blanket protection per City of Rancho ( $2,35o.oor $4,700.00 $4,700.0~ $1,800.00 $3,600.001 $~,6~.06 26. 3onstruct pipe closure, Type "A" per S.B C F.CD. Std. ------ $2,350.00 ~~ $2,700.'--l~00 $2,700.00~ 27. ~othole ail existing utilities crossing proposed storm drain $8_~~ $ 8,500.0'----~1"'~ $8,500.001 ~ 28 10 inductive Iccp detectors, complete in place $411.00] $4,110.00 $4,110.0'~"~ $300."'--'~0 29. 1 Traffic Signing, Striping and Pavement Markings, $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00, $6,000.0"~-~"--~' ~ 30. I ,including1300'+ofK-Rail ~ ~ $80,000.00 ~ 3 I~~ __ SWPPP ~pa~e7 , ~ $40,000.00 $40,000.00] ~ F00THII.I. BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND PAVEMENT REHABILATION (FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE) V' --"'~ F"l FC~3THILL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Slaff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Mike Bell, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 WITH MAX]MUS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FIRE DISTRICT COST OF SERVICE/USER FEE STUDY AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $25,000 INTO ACCOUN1- NUMBER 1016301-5300 FROM THE COMMUNrl'Y DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus in the amount of $25,000 to provide consulting services related to the preparation of a Fire District Cost of Service/User Fee Study, to be funded from Account Number 1016301-5300 from the Community Development Technical Services (Fund 16) fund balance. BACKGROUND The California Fire Code, 2001 Edition (adopted by ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga) Section 103.3.1.1 states: "The fire prevention bureau shall inspect, as often as necessary, buildings and premises....for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be corrected any conditions which would reasonably tend to cause fire or contribute to its spread, or any violation of the purpose and provisions of the Fire Code and of any other law or standard affecting fire safety." The frequency of these inspections is set by the authority having jurisdiction except in the case of certain state regulated occupancies such as schools, apartments, institutions and high rise buildings which must be inspected annually. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Fire Prevention Bureau has, among other assignments, the primary task of conducting the required inspections of all commercial, retail, industrial and state-regulated occupancies in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. C:\WiNNT\Temporary Intemet Files\OLK1D\Council Report Fire Feesl.doc In 2003/04 the District analyzed the city's building stock and established priorities within the parameters of available resources to ensure that certain occupancies would be inspected at appropriate intervals. These priorities and the resource assigned are as follows: Types of Inspections Amount Frequency Assi~]ned Resource State Mandated 250 Annual 1 FTE- 40 hr. Public Assembly 320 Annual 1 FTE- 40 hr. Permitted Occupancies 1000 1-2 years 100 assigned to 56 (haz mat/high pile stock, hour staff (3) flammable liquids) 900 unassigned Light/Moderate Hazard 2830 Once every Engine Companies three years (24) PTE (FPA-3) Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) 100 Annual No resoume available Fuel Modiflcaton (approx) These totals do not reflect any of the many other activities performed by Fire Prevention Bureau staff. These would include Fireworks displays, temporary use permits (events), underground tank installations, complaint inspections, support for Fire Construction Services, public education, emergency incident support etc. It does factor in the expected annual workload of a full-time inspector including report writing, 3ublic contact and follow-up inspections. The 56-hour inspectors have a full workload responding to and mitigating incidents involving fire alarms and actual fires. Many of their responses create cases requiring immediate and thorough follow-up. Thus, their availability to conduct regular inspections is limited. There is a gap of approximately 900 moderate to high hazard occupancies that are not being inspected routinely. Additionally, no established program for an annual inspection of the many parcels in the WUI requiring fuel modification currently exists. Furthermore, the District currently has no system in place, nor resource assigned the task of specializing in Hazardous Materials inspections, record keeping and response support. The gap between the demand for service and the available resources represents a critical need for the Fire District to identify and secure the means to fund and staff additional positions within the Fire Prevention Bureau. Based on the numbers indicated above and the projected work load for a given full time employee, the District is recommending a plan that would eventually bring four additional full-time inspection personnel, one additional full-time supervisor, and one Office Specialist II onto the staff. -2- Two of these positions could be classified as Fire Prevention Specialist 1, two as Fire Prevention Specialist II and one as a newly created Fire Marshal (non-safety). This staffing increase is necessary to meet the increasing demands placed on the District due to the major growth of commercial/retail/industrial/schools & multi-family establishments in the community during the past several years. This building boom is expected to continue and further add to the workload of the District's Fire Prevention staff. SUMMARY: In summary, current Fire Prevention Bureau staffing prohibits us from meeting our fire and life safety inspection goals. Given current resources the Fire Prevention Bureau will not be able to inspect approximately 580 occupancies in a given year. This issue is compounded annually and with the continual development of commercial and residential properties requiring inspection. This analysis and the implementation of its recommendations will enable the District to develop a secure revenue source to adequately fund and staff its growing fire and life safety inspection programs, most of which are mandated by state law and adopted fire codes. This approach has been adopted by several agencies in our area, and in fact, as been standard procedure in places like Chino, West Covina and Ontario for many years. Respectfully submitted, Fire Chief PMB/crf Attachment -3- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST TO UTILIZE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND RESERVES DATE: June 8, 2005 AMOUNT REQUESTED: $25,000 REQUESTING DEPT.: Fire DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST AND HOW IT PERTAINS TO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY: This is to fund a Cost of Service/User Fee Study for the Fire District. The study will focus primarily on activities conducted by the Fire Prevention Bureau including fire inspections required by fire code and state mandates. Increased development has resulted in the construction of many new buildings requirinf) annual inspections. This demand has surpassed the Fire Prevention Bureau's ability to conduct required inspections on a timely basis. The results of the study may lead to an adjustment in existing fees and the creation of new fees to recover the costs of providing inspection services and help provide fundin9 for staff increases. Many jurisdictions and most city depadments have conducted fee studies recently. It has been ever 10 years since these fees have been reviewed. Study to be done by Maximus FUNDING A VAILABILITY VERIFIED FINANCE OFFICER: IDATE: l/i~ AUTHORIZATION DEPARTMENTHEAD//,,(~'-~/,,,~ ~ DATE: ~//~/,~-~'-'~ - I I Approved L-J Denied CITY MANAGER: DATE: DISTRIBUTION ORIGINAL: Attach signed original to Purchase Requisition submitted by department COPY: Forward copy of signed original to Finance Department i&finance~budget2OO2~CD Tech Srvcs Fund request, xls 7 5 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAXIMUS PROPOSAL TO PERFORM A COST OF SERVICE/USER FEE STUDY for the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MAXIMUS May 3, 2005 Manfred Endres, Senior Vice President Western Region Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectioh District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study ~V~AXIMUS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR NEEDS MAXIMUS works closely with our clients to ensure a full understanding of your needs. By establishing a common understanding of the client's problems and needs at the project initiation stage, MAXIMUS is able to deliver a superior product. The District is charged with three primary missions: (1) fire suppression, (2) emergency response, and (3) structural inspection for fire safety issues. Our proposal will document the overall costs for each area, but concentrate on developing costs for specific services in mission 3. Governmental jurisdictions are funded through a variety of revenue "streams": taxes, subventions, grants, and fees. With a given level of expenditures, any subsidy created by less than full cost recovery means taxes have to rise (difficult to accomplish) or services need to be reduced. Our firm's basic fee-setting philosophy is that an individual or group/business getting a specific benefit from a governmental service that is not either given or requested by the general population should fully pay for that service. Anything less requires a subsidy that must be made up elsewhere, or overall services reduced (assumes a steady-state revenue/expenditure balance). Fire service fees are similar - and also dissimilar - than other fees typically charged by local governmental jurisdictions. In planning situations, for example, there would be no need for a planning department - or fees - if the jurisdiction was completely built out and no new infill was contemplated. In this regard, fire new construction fees are similar to planning (or building & safety) fees. What is dissimilar are services for fire inspection of existing structures, where there is a benefit not only to the recipient - even though not necessarily requested - but also to the community at large. As a growing, dynamic city, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (and the District) play a vital role in the orderly development of its geography and the protection on its citizenry. New growth requires initial fire structural plan checking and inspection services The District also has a substantial on-going inspection obligation, including the following occupancies: · State mandated inspections (250 annually) · Public Assembly (320 annually) · Permitted occupancies (1,000; 1-2 years) · Light/Moderate Hazard (2,830; once every three years) · Wildland Urban Interface fuel modification (100; annually) Note: the District is also charged with specialized plan checking and review of new construction. While most of new construction plan checking and inspection services are managed by the City's Building Department (and studied under a previous contract), the District does perform selected, primarily fee-limited reviews/inspections. May 3, 2005 I Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectio~ District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAX1MUS The District clearly recognizes the general opportunity to modify its fee levels to align better with actual costs, including overhead. Whether or not it is the primary goal of the City, the immediate benefit of this result is usually an overall increase in fee revenues to the City. A HA×:rMUS study will help you achieve your objectives, and many others. Benefits include an analysis that: · Is supportable and defensible--to the Fire Board, the City Council, the public, local industry, and the courts. · Is consistent with local, state, and federal cost recovery requirements, and allow for future program changes. · Identifies new fees and other opportunities for the District to increase the scope and breadth of its fee revenue generation ability. · Creates an empirical basis for allocating costs fairly and equitably to the users of specific services. · Complies with State laws and their interpretations. · Increases revenue to the Fire fund--within the bounds of proper and defensible accounting treatments. PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION I,'._2~XIRUS knows local government issues and practices from the inside, but we also listen to our clients' needs and special circumstances. This intimate approach, combined with our larger experience, helps lVl/~XVRIJS customize our excellent study methods for you to achieve your goals. EFFECTIVE WORK PLAN MAXIIqUS employs a very detailed and rigorous work process to perform cost of service/fee studies. The documentation of the entire process would be extraordinarily voluminous, and any review of it would be overly burdensome. The summary shown below provides an overview of our approach. We will customize the individual tasks, add or delete tasks, and make other changes necessary to adapt to the specific circumstances we may find in the District. In summary, we will: Interview and work cldsely with the respective Fire divisions to identify the most appropriate of our methodologies and analytical models to employ for the District's study. Guide the District through the necessary data collection processes. Conduct careful analysis of data, including validation and'vetting to ensure reasonableness and accuracy. Provide multiple iterations of results and opportunities for District review and input. Communicate the process, results, and findings to the District. May 3, 2005 2 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectio~ District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAXlMU$ QUALITY CONTROL (QC) A study is not complete until it is right. MAXIMUS employs a multi-step quality control (validation and vetting) process to ensure that the assumptions, data, analysis, results, and conclusions are accurate and meaningful. This QC process starts with clear and understandable instructions to those District staff involved in the study, and continues at each project step with testing and cross-checking of the data, applications of our experience for reasonableness tests, and balancing of various key elements in the results. The integrity of the study process and the consultants is paramount. 'The District deserves a study that you can use with confidence and present to your constituents with certainty. COMMUNICATION A study is not useful if nobody understands it. MAXIHUS wants to ensure that the involved District staff, management, executive leadership, and Fire Board all understand the study and its results. To this end, we included two presentations (kick-off and final) and a series of other on-site meetings. During these working meetings, we devote a significant amount of time to discussing the various issues, processes, data, and results with those who will be responsible for using the study. We expect that our processes will leave the District with a clear understanding of the principles and practical applications of fee analysis and results. The District also has the opportunity for us to provide additional meetings and presentations with the Fire Board or other groups. In past studies, we have conducted formal presentations and discussion forums with Chambers of Commerce, Building Industry Associations, Community Development Task Groups, governing body sub- committees, multi-jurisdictional local government associations, and a variety of other private and non-profit community groups. SERVICES AND PRODUCTS INCLUDED TO MEET YOUR GOALS I~IMUS customizes our project tools and methods to reflect the best business practices and needs of each client. Our flexible, yet rigorous, methods ensure that MAXIMUS is able to deliver great accuracy and useful results. In addition to the intrinsic value of the study process itself, MAXIMUS will provide the District with the following specific' deliverable products: · Cost of Service (User Fee) Study: MAXlMUS will conduct a study of the actual full cost of providing user fee-related services in the respective Fire divisions, including all direct, indirect, and support costs. Other parts of this proposal describe the details, but in general, the outcome of this study will be individual cost schedules (detail and May'3, 2005 3 qq Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectioh District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study M XIMUS summary) 'of potential fees for each Fire division analyzed for this study. The cost schedules will also illustrate comparisons and potential revenue impacts of fee changes to cost levels. · Summary Report: HAXirHUS will prepare a fee study report (necessary drafts and final) to describe our general methodologies and findings (and recommendations, if applicable). HA×IHrJS will provide copies of each document, as well as electronic files. · Meetings and Presentations: H~XIHUS will facilitate the necessary on-site meetings with District staff and management to accomplish the goals of this project. We anticipate two on-site visits to kick-off the project and facilitate the study processes, with multiple meetings during each trip. In addition, H~XZHUS will participate in one presentation to Fire Board/City Council at the end of the project to explain the project processes and results. · Expert Guidance and Advice: Throughout the course of the project, H/~Xi[[vltJS will provide a variety of information to District staff and mariagement to help them return data worksheets, consider relevant issues, make informed decisions, optimize implementation, and better understand the cost analysis process and the eventual results. We intend to impart much of our experience on the District staff involved in the study, thereby facilitating their assistance to us; and, more importantly, ensuring that the District can use the results and further communicate the outcomes and the processes to the citizens and other customers of the District's services after H~XIHUS is gone. DIVISIONS AND SERVICES iNCLUDED IN THE USER FEE STUDY A good rule of thumb for determining'whether a fee should be included in the study is whether staff can identify their time spent performing that service. If the District cannot provide time data (including estimates), the fee is likely excluded from this study. In addition, the ability to provide cost of service results is limited by the availability of cost data, so programs and activities without definable costs are also excluded. The primary goal is to develop an annual permit renewal inspection program and recovery potential for the Districts overall fire inspection program. We anticipate analyzing the following activities: new construction plan checking and inspection (areas not covered in the original Building Division fee analysis), permitted occupancies, light/moderate hazard occupancies (routine inspections), the Wildland Urban Interface Fuel Modification program, weed abatement (new potential service), and false alarms. These service areas will include defining costs within the Fire Prevention Bureau, and the Suppression Division. We anticipate using both our NEXUS building computer model, and our MAXFEE computer model in the study. NEXUS'was designed (originally for building departments) to analyze new construction fees where it is necessary to provide a fee schedule that correlates services to varying construction categories and structural square footages. We May 3, 2005 4 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectie~ District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study ~MAXIMU5 anticipate using the model developed for the City's Building Department as the basic framework for the Fire analysis. In this way the output will be consistent, leading to a user friendly implementation and acceptance by the community. MAXFEE is our software application used for specific fees where more definite time per activity data is known. This application is typically used in planning, engineering, police, and permitted/routine fee analyses. Both models were used in the prior City of Rancho Cucamonga fee studies. They have been completely vetted by governmental jurisdictions and industry groups in hundreds of studies throughout California and the West Coast. A decided side-benefit of our systems is the capability to project future staffing requirements based on anticipated time-to-complete activities. In this way, staff will gain knowledge of personnel gain/loss based on anticipated volume and service times. Note: this information is ancillary to the proposed project. MAXIMUS would be pleased to work with the District in crafting a more formal analysis and report of our findings under a scope addition work order. PROJECT SCHEDULE MAXIMUS works with our clients to develop and adhere to a project schedule that balances the needs for quality, client reviews, and expediency. The steps necessary to conduct the fee study for the District is reasonably well defined. In addition to our work processes, we solicit data, issue resolution, document review, and general feedback from various district staff at appropriate points in the project. We have the staff resources necessary to complete the project in a timely manner. However, the ultimate schedule (and timeliness) of the project relies upon the responsiveness to our requests for information, data, review, and feedback. We are able to provide results sooner than scheduled if the District shortens its review and response times. At the outset of the project, we will meet with District representatives to establish appropriate timeframes for the various project tasks, including reasonable review periods for the District. If desired, the result can be a diagrammed schedule that both parties agree will guide the project. As circumstances warrant, we will adjust the schedule after consultation with the District. FUTURE UPDATES Annual adjustments to fee levels and cost plan allocation levels are important to ensure that the District does not fall behind in its cost recovery objectives. However, for most jurisdictions we study, MAXIMUS does not recommend annual updates of the fee study. Unless the District experiences significant changes in its organizational structure or operational practices, the general fee structure and baseline costs we identify can be used for three to five years with only minor annual adjustments necessary. May 3, 2005 5 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prot6ctio~ District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study ~ MAXIMUS QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE, & PROPOSED TEAM MAXIMUS is the nation's leader in government cost analysis. We have served more clients than any other firm, defined the industry, and set the standards for quality and innovation for over 27 years. MAXIMUS MAXIMUS is the dominant provider of cost of service and fee analysis services to government in California and the nation. Our experience summary includes the following: · In California, we have provided fiscal studies to over 300 cities, counties, and special districts, including the city of Rancho Cucamonga. · Since 1983, we have performed over 100 user fee studies for more than 70 clients. · We have conducted (completed and in progress) about 40 NEXUS cost-based Building Fee studies. We seek to identify not only the full cost of each current user fee service, but also all services for which the client might not currently be charging a fee (new fees). We bring innovation to our studies, an example of which is the creation of our NEXUS building fee system. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, our studies can be implemented with minimum imposition on District staff and with confidence in knowing that the numbers are right. MAXIMUS, Inc. is a public corporation formed in 1976 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (MMS). In FY 2004 the company had revenues of $605 million and employed 5,300 staff, which reflects the company's continual growth. David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. merged with HAXIMUS in 1998 to become the Cost Services Division. The firm is the nation's largest consulting company specializing in local and state government financial, operations improvement, systems, and health care applications. The Cost Services Division comprises 150 professionals serving over 1,000 governments, universities, and other public sector and not-for-profit organizations each year. INNOVATION AND EXPERIENCE The Cost Services Division of MAXIMUS has served local government in California for over 27 years. We became the dominant cost consultants in the West by creating the industry standards for cost allocation plans and fee (cost of service) studies, and by providing consistent quality and value. As the local government finance environment has changed, we have maintained the pace with innovative solutions and increasingly skilled staff. Our goal, as always, has been to enhance service and quality to our customers. May 3, 2005 6 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectio~ District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study ~ MAX1MU5 .We continue to distinguish ourselves by employing the most advanced analysis theory to develop practical approaches and the most effective tools in the industry. Examples of our new developments include: · Building Fee Analysis: We developed and enhanced the NEXUS cost-based solution for building and fire fees. This analytical approach and model identifies the actual costs for building plan checks and inspections, as well as other services, to help our clients more directly comply with the requirements of state law. · Activity-Based Costing: We developed specific expertise in this proven method (and software) to identify and calculate costs at an even more detailed level-- which identifies targets of opportunity for management intervention, process improvement, and reengineering. · Performance Measurement: We developed a large database of performance measures and the techniques to help you identify and implement relevant measure for your jurisdiction. · Software: We developed a series of Excel-based analytical models, which allow greater flexibility and potential future updates by our clients. PROJECT TEAM The team assigned to this project is as follows: Projoct Director: Manfred Endres, Sonior ¥i¢e President Manfred Endres is the region's senior vice president. As a principle officer in the firm, Mr. Endres will be involved with contract negotiations, provide general project oversight, and marshal appropriate company resources to complete the project in an expeditious and quality fashion. Mr. Endres has managed and directed hundreds of cost analysis projects during his career with MAXIMUS. Mr. Endres has more than 25 years of accounting, financial reporting, budgeting, property taxation and financial analysis experience in the governmental and not-for-profit sector. He has conducted cost for service studies and directed user fee engagements over the last 15 years at MAXIMUS. His range of project experience includes the following: Development and implementation of cost allocation plans System analysis, design, development, and' implementation Program impact analysis Re~,enue maximization Program management Although he is our Western Region Senior Vice President, Mr. Endres remains involved in projects as a hands-on project Director. He is located in our Irvine office, and will always be available to the City and to the rest of the project team. May 3, 2005 7 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectio~ District Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAXIMUS Richard Pearl, Manager - Client Services Mr. Pearl is the firm's most experienced user fee specialist. He is the co-creator of the firm's MAXFEE concept (1983) and the "godfather" of NEXUS (2000). His tenure with MAXIMUS spanned 1976 through 2005. Until his retirement in January 2005 he led the Western Region as Senior Vice President and Regional Director. He is arguably the State's leading expert in user fee analysis, and has presented seminars on cost and revenue issues to local, state, and international finance groups. Mr. Pearl is currently associated with the firm as the Region's Client Services and Special Projects manager. He will accept a limited number of direct engagements, and we are pleased to have him associated with this project as an on-site consultant. Nicole Kissam, Consultant Nicole Kissam is a consultant inthe Cost Services Division of H~XIHUS. Since joining H~XIHUS in early 2003, Ms. Kissam has assisted or developed Cost Allocation Plans and enhanced User Fee Studies for a number of California clients, including the cities of San Buenaventura, Hercules, Livermore, Lancaster, Paso Robles, Santa Maria, and Vallejo; and the counties of Butte, Napa, and E1 Dorado. Ms. Kissam has prior direct experience in budget and revenue analysis for local government, as well as consulting experience in management, marketing, and public relations for private companies. She will be responsible for the on-site interviews and analysis for selected function(s). She will also provide support analysis and data collection activities independently and under the guidance of the project manager. Ms. Kissam earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Brian Foster, Senior Manager Brian Foster returned to MAXIMUS after serving for three years as the City Treasurer and Financial Services Manager with the City of E1 Cerrito, California. As such, Mr. Foster has extensive experience in preparing financial reports and analyses, developing fee schedules, preparing State Controller's Reports, etc. Since he returned to MAXIMUS, Mr. Foster has conducted User Fee Studies for the City of Brentwood and the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District. Mr. Foster's previous appointment within MAXIMUS, for about three years, was in the Management Studies Group, where he provided expert analysis and advice to cities, counties, and special districts on how to improve their operational processes in virtually all facets of governmental finance and operations, including planning, building, and public works--skills that will prove quite valuable in this assignment. Mr. Foster will be responsible for on-site interviews and analysis for selected function(s). Mr. Foster holds a master's degree in Public Policy and a bachelor's degree in Political Science and Economics (double major), from the U. C. - Berkeley. May 3, 2005 8 Rancho Cucamonga Fire ProtectiOh District Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAXlMUS GENERAL OOST PROPOSAL INFORMATION ta_3~]:M~S focuses on value to the client. Our proposed prices reflect a solid value for the work we will perform, and our flexibility allows our clients to customize the project to meet their needs and desired expenditures. PROPOSED PROJECT COST MAXIMUS will deliver the proposed Cost of Service Study for a fixed fee of $25,000 including all expenses. Our fixed cost is based upon our estimated use of consultants at the following rates: Consultant Hourly Consultant Level Hourly Level Rate Rate Vice President $ 215 Senior Consultant $115 Director $175 Associate $100 Senior Manager $150 Consultant $ 75 Manager $140 Support Staff The above price assumes one formal, public, presentation at the conclusion of the study (governing body or special interest group) and a brief report of our findings and fee recommendations. The report and data tables will include current fee levels, full cost of each fee and service area, and our recommendations/suggestions for specific fee increases. The report will also include our findings and recommendations of potentially new fee areas. Additional presentations, or a detailed, expansive report would be provided at MAXIMUS current billing rates (above) after specific scope(s) is negotiated. Our goal is to provide the District with the most cost/effective product, but we are always pleased to expand our services to the client to further their objectives. In our initial discussion with the District, interest was expressed in having MAX1MUS: (1) .augment the proposed study to present a management perspective of future staffing requirements and (2) assist the District in some of the specific results implementation (work load~flow). We are very willing and capable of assisting in these areas, but believe both the District's, and our firm's, best interests can be furthered by waiting to propose on these areas until the study is fairly well in progress so that we might have a more. specific understanding of the scope and desired outcomes. Time Line Since we are under existing contract to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the contracting process should be straight forward. We are prepared to begin the project within two weeks of contract execution. With reasonable response time to questions, and review of results, the study numbers should be available within two to three months. Thereafter, it becomes difficult to May 3, 2005 9 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protectidfl District ~ Proposal to Perform a Cost of Service/User Fee Study MAXIMUS forecast completion times due to senior management review and critique of the final report, and scheduled presentations to the governing body or special interest groups. BILLING MILESTONES NAX I HU $ proposes to invoice the District for completed work according to the following schedules of milestones: · Completion of user fee initial interviews and data collection: 30% · Delivery of draft user fee analysis: 35% · Delivery of draft user fee report 20% · Delivery of final user fee report: 10% · Completionofall services:. 5% COST CONTROL HAXIIqUS always conducts user fee studies under a "fixed fee" arrangement. In this manner, our clients know the entire cost of the project prior to the commencement of the engagement. Furthermore, this approach eliminates the perception or potential perception that our determination of costs and fees was influenced by possible increases to our own bottom line (as could be the case of a contingency fee basis). The HAXIHUS cost proposal assumes that we are able to employ our effective standard approach to this Cost of Service study, which includes a specified number of on-site visits: two kick-off/process visits and one final presentation/meeting. The travel and work time could result in excessive costs if the District is unable to participate effectively in our normal process. The proposed on-site visits and our follow-up methodologies/communication procedures should be sufficient to collect the necessary data and facilitate effective District and MAXIMUS review of the results. Problems occur when a client fails to perform expected tasks within the agreed-upon time, are absent from key meetings, require extra personal interaction from the consultants, or otherwise demand additional on-site meetings. If the District requires excessive on-site visits (over two), due to District-caused delays, lack of participation in earlier meetings, District staffing changes, management actions, or other factors not caused by HAXIHUS, we will identify and communicate the potential cost of these additional visits in advance to allow the District to make an informed decision whether to request supplemental visits. Our price also assumes that we devote not more than 16 hours of professional time to this project after delivery of our draft report, for further editing, research, meetings or work of any kind related to this project (except proposed presentation/meetings). Should we need to devote time in excess of 16 hours after delivery of the draft, we would ch~ge our actual time and expenses for the additional services at our standard hourly rates. Actual time spent after delivery of the draft is unlikely to exceed 16 hours. May 3, 2005 10 MAXIM-OS -- City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of June 8, 2005, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection district, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and MAXIMUS, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). A. Recitals. (i) The CITY seeks to enter into an Agreement with a qualified CONSULTANT to assist the CITY to provide professional and consulting services with respect to assistance in the preparation and/or analysis of Fire Protection District user fees paid to the CITY; and (ii) CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for providing these professional and consulting services, and the CITY has determined that CONSULTANT'S proposal should be accepted and an Agreement entered into; and (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iiiv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The research and preparation of a User Fee Study and Report and implementation support. A proposal and schedule of work (including deliverables) is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The anticipated date of completion of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public Page 1 of 9 /~7 MAXIM'US -- City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT hearings shall be as set forth by mutual consent at the initial Project kick-off meeting and revised as circumstances warrant. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all final charts, models, worksheets, surveys, reports, and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical and fiscal documents, as described in Exhibit "A" within the time specified in Section Bl(c). CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents, and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary and appropriate and as limited in Exhibit "A." The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section BI(c) may be extended upon mutual agreement of CITY and CONSULTANT. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT for this project except as specified in the proposal or upon the · prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A." (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the "Billing Milestones" identified by CONSULTANT in Exhibit "A." Invoices shall be submitted by CONSULTANT after CITY receives such milestone deliverables and those invoices shall be Page2 of 9 MAXIMUS - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT's proposal. (c) (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental fiscal documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in CONSULTANT'S Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Documentation regarding the methods and standards hereto practiced in regards to the evaluation and implementation of the CITY'S current fee schedule. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in any attachment hereto, any and all intellectual property or other proprietary data owned by the Consultant prior to the effective date of this Agreement ("Preexisting Information") shall remain the exclusive property of the Consultant even if such Preexisting Information is embedded or otherwise incorporated in materials or products first Page 3 of 9 H3,XII,~S - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT produced as a result of this Contract or used to develop such materials or products. The City's rights under this section shall not apply to any Preexisting Information or any component thereof regardless of form or media. 6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated, on a pro-rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, charts, models, worksheets, surveys, reports, data, studies, surveys, and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall not commence work under this contract until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies reasonably acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Contract the following policies of insurance: (a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all of the CONSULTANT's employees-carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California for no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. Further, such policy of insurance shall provide that the Page 4 of 9 //~ I~_gXII~3S - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY and its elected officials, officers, employees and agents. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract." (b) For all operations of the CONSULTANT or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: (1) Commercial General Liability (occurrence) - for bodily injury, death and property damage for products/completed operations and any other activities undertaken by the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. (2) [deleted] (3) Commercial Automobile Liability (occurrence) - for bodily injury, death and property damage insuring against Consultant's liability arising out of the use of any vehicle. (4) Professional Errors and Omissions Liability insuring against Consultant's liability arising out of professional errors and/or omissions, providing protection of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence for errors and/or omissions and wrongful acts of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. If any such policy and/or policies have a retroactive date, that date shall be no later than the date of first performance of work or services on behalf of CITY. Each such policy or policies shall include a standard "notice of cancellation "provision. (5) [deleted] (6) The policies of insurance required in this Section b shall have no less than the following limits of coverage: (i) $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) for bodily injury or death; (ii) $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars) for property damage. (iii)The total of the limits specified in subsections (i) and (ii), above, where a combined single limit is provided. Page 5 of 9 /// I~XI~JS -- City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (c) Thc policies of insurance rcquired in subsections (I), and (2) and (3) of Section b., above, shall: (1) Be subject to no deductible amount unless otherwise provided, or approved in writing by CITY; (2) Be issued by an insurance company reasonably approved in writing by CITY, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A- or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide; (3) Names as additional insureds the CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, attorneys and agents, specified by CITY to be included; (4) Specify that it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; (5) Specify that it applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability; (6) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by CITY of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." (7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided to the additional insureds; (8) Specify that the insurer waives all fights of subrogation against any of the additional insureds; and (9) Specify that costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (10) Otherwise be in form reasonably satisfactory to CITY. (d) Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original Certificates of Insurance-evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates of Insurance-shall be signed by a person authorized Page6 of 9 //2 MAXIMUS - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All Certificates of Insurance-shall be received and reasonably approved by the CITY before CONSULTANT commences performance. If Performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one (1) year, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with the required Certificates of Insurance-evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold CITY and CITY Personnel harmless from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, demands, judgments, attorneys' fees, costs, damages to persons or property, losses, penalties, obligations, expenses or liabilities (herein "Claims" or "Liabilities") that may be asserted or claimed by any person or entity arising out of the willful or negligent acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT or its employees in the performance of any tasks or services for or on behalf of City. 10.. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. [deleted] 12. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employees, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 13. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 15. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein Page 7 of 9 //3 MAXIMUS - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. Page 8 of 9 //~ I~mXlmls - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: MAXIMUS, Inc. Manfred Endres Date Senior Vice President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Municipal Corporation William J. Alexander Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Recommended for Approval: Approved as to form: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer City Attomey Page 9 of 9 //5 MAXIMUS - City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Exhibit A: Proposal To Perform A Fire Protection District User Fcc Study Exhibit A //b R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTPIENT Stllff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria Perez, Associate Engineer ',~z"~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $174,945.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, ROADWAY ENGINEERING INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,494.50 FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND BANYAN AVENUE CURB RETURN PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1466124-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $16,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1466124-0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $174 945.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Roadway Engineering Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,494.50, for The Northeast Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Avenue Curb Return Project, to be funded from Transportation funds, Account No. 11243035650/1466124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $16,000.00 to Account No. 11243035650/1466124-0 from Transportation fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 2, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $141,235.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential Staff has completed the required backgroun'd investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The construction of this project is to saw-cut and remove existing asphalt concrete; cold plane, crack seal, place crushed aggregate base and asphalt concrete paving; install curb and gutter, II'I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Bids and Award the Northeast Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Avenue Curb Return Project June 15, 2005 Page 2 cobble curb and gutter, drive approaches, and modify the traffic signal to standard phasing. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, William J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MP/RO:Is Attachments BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 2, 2005 APPARENTLOWBIDDER The Northeast Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Avenue Curb Return Project ENGINEERS COST Roadway Engineering -- ESTIMATE Inc. NO QTY' UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT i UNIT I · COST I AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS Clearing and Grubbing $20,000.00] $20,000.00 $20,000.001 $20,000.00 2. 151( LS RemoveA.C. Pavement, including sawcutting $3.00! $4,530.00 $1.60 $2,416.00 3. 45 TON Construct 4" Crushed Aggregate Base $80.00[ $3,600.00 $94.00 $4,230.00 4. 30 TON Construct Asphalt Concrete Pavement $7o.oor*2,100.0C *150.00r *4,500.00 5. 390 TON Variable Asphalt Concrele (0.10' to 0.78') $70.001 $27,300.00 $88.001 $34,320.00 6. 910 SY Variable Cold Plane (0.00' to 0.10') $3.50 $3,185.00 $5.60] $5,096.00 7. 2 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to finish grade $650.00 $1,300.00 $700.00[ $1,400.00 8. 5 EA a'djustWaterValveB°x&C°vert°finishgrade $150.00] $750.0( $220.00 $1,100.00 9. EA a, djust Pressure Regulator & Cover to finish grade $150.00 $150.00 $220.00 $220.00 lO 4 EA Adjust Pull Box & Cover to finish grade $100.0( $400.00 $220.00] $880.0( Il I EA Construct catch basin perCity Standard 301, W=14', including Iocaldepression and removalofexistir $8,000.001 $8,000.00 $16,000.00[ $16,000.00 12. 130 LF Cons ruct 8" P.C.C Curb & 24" Gutter $30.00J $3,900.00 $20.001 $2,600.00 13. 160 LF Construct P.C.C. Cobble Curb & Gutter (varies 8" tO 12"), including removal of existing $35.00] $5,600.00 $48.00] $7,680.00 14. 1500 SF Construct6 P.C.C.D'vewayApproach $?.00[ $I0,500.0C $5.80[ $8,700.00 15. 430 SF onstruct 6 P.C.C. D~vewayApproach w~ h Cobble Curb Return $9.00[ $3,870.00 $7.50 $3,225.00 16. 23C SF P.C.C. Wheelchair Ramp, Including retaining curb and removal of existing $7.00 $1,610.00 $4.00 $920.00 17. 24 LF 2.onstruct P.C.C. Splash Curb $35.00 $840.00 $22.001 $528.0(3 18. 120 SF Construct Rockscape $20.001 $2,400.00 $33.001 $3,960.00 19. 1 EA Adjust Water Meter Box to Grade $100.001 $100.00 $220.00[ $220.00 20. 21 LF Construct 18" Diameter Reinforced Concrete Pipe, including excavation, backfill, trench repair and re~ $200.00] $4,200.00 $220.001 $4,620.00 21. 23 EA R~ place Inductive Loop Detecetors $3oo.ooj $6,900.00 $250.001 $5,750.00 22. 1 LS Relocate and InstalIPedestrian Push Buttons $3,000.00[ $3,000.00 $550.001 $550.00 23. 1 LS Restore Landscaping and Irrigation System $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 24. LS Traffic Control Gt,O00.O0 $1,000.0(3 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 25. LS 'l'raffic Striping and Signing $5,000.001 $5,000.0(3 $2,630.00 $2,630.00 26. LS Traffic SignaI Modification per City Drawing No. 2038, Sheet3 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,400.00 $30,400.00 I TOTAL ]5141,235.00 [$174,945.00 VICINITY MAP NEC ETIWANDA AND BANYAN AVE. CURB RETURN PROJECT PROJECT-- LOCATION Banyan St '.:' ~ ~Reute30 tgth St ~l~d AV B~se Line Rd ~d' A~ow R~ 8th St t0 Freeway__. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R 1' M E N T StaffR x rt DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Maintenance Superintendent SUIIIECr: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,405.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SADIE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED OF ATWOOD, CALIFORNIA, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,840.00 FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3 FROM THE CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT 1025001-5300 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 04/05 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $38,405.00 to the apparent low bidder, Sadie Construction Incorporated of Atwood, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,840.00 for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3 from the Capital Reserve account 1025001-5300 as approved in the FY 04/05 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 (see attached Bid Summary). The funding for this project was approved in the FY 04-05 budget for $60,000. Staff has reviewed all bid documents and found Sadie Construction Incorporated to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. The project specifications were bid as a standard Public Works contract for the third phase replacement of the old County box blade signs that are no longer reflective. Bids include 284 nine inch street name signs to be placed at the following locations: Grove Ave., Archibald Ave._ Hermosa Ave., Haven Ave., Milliken Ave Roches Etiwanda Ave. East Ave 4t~ ~t ^--~--. n ..... · ........ ', te.[ Ave., Day. Creek Blvd. . -., .... , ,~uw r,t~., rootmu mvu., t~ase Line Rd., and 19u' St. The b~d work sheets required bidders to submit unit prices for six specific configurations of sign mounting in accordance with City standard drawings and bid totals were based on the sum of those specific unit prices. This project will upgrade the size and visibility of the City's street name signs to aid the general public, service providers and emergency responders in navigating throughout the City. Res/pe~ii'~lly submitted, willia~ .~. 0 Neil City Engineer WJO:GV:dlw BID SUMMARY CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT~ PHASE Bidder's Name Total Bid Stemdahl Enterprises, Inc. $54,360.00 Sudhakar Company Int'l. $41,000.00 ..__~ &_. S 5(g~__Co. mp~y,__J~nc__. _ $39,478.00 . : Sadie Constm¢fion,:In¢. $38,405.00~' * Sadie Construction, Inc. apparent low responsive, responsible bidder R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T StalT Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00572, LOCATED 9649 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MCDONALD'S CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DRC2001-00572 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2001-00572, located 9649 Foothill Boulevard on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, East of Archibald Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it' is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: McDonald's Corporation Release: Faithful Performance Bond #6239211 $33,000.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #6239211-0001 $3,300.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) RESOLUT,ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00572 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2001-00572 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, 'certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEEDING DEPADTHENT StaffR ort DA'I~: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRC2003- 00732, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF JACK BENNY DRIVE, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY BATES- EVERGREEN PARTNERS, LLC & STADIUM PLAZA SOUTH, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI~ Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRC2003-00732 were approved by the City Council on June 16, 2004, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $866,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: $433,050.00 Due to an elongated construction period it ~s necessary to request an extension. The developer, Bates-Evergreen Partners, LLC & Stadium Plaza South, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respe~ively submitted-, City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments 4 THE BATES COMPANY BROKERAGE INVESTMENTS MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT May 25, 2005 Ms. Tasha Hunter City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2003-00732 Dear Ms. Hunter: We are in receipt of your letter dated May 17, 2005 concerning the above-referenced item. Due to an elongated construction period we indeed do need to request an extension of the subject Improvement Agreement for DRC2003-00732. Please find enclosed the executed Improvement Agreement Extension you had included with your letter along with a check for $298 for the processing fee. Please contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, The l~ates Company Chris Atldnson / Vice President I47 East Olive Avenue . Monrovia, CA91oi6 3407 · Phone626 305-5338 · Fax626 3o5 www,TheBatesCompany.com . CITY OF RAN(~Ho CUCAMONGA No-writ ' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO sT^T~: oF C^.FO~i^ 65- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00732 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 15, 2005, by Bates-Evergreen Partners, LLC & Stadium Plaza South, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north and south sides of Jack Benny Drive, east of Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2003-00732; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARYMENT StaffR 1 ort DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AIcp, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR DRCDR00- 79, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY BURNETT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DRCDR00-79 were approved by the City Council on January 15, 2003, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $614,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: $307,100.00 The project is substantially complete, except for one additional Phase to be completed. The developer, Burnett Development Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectively submitted, . W~am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachments COMPANIES April 25, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Attn: Tasha Hunter RE: RANCHO CUCAMONGA IOWN SQUARE - TRACT NO. 16179 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DRCDR00-79 Dear Ms. Hunter: Enclosed please find the Improvement Agreement Extension executed by Developer, in triplicate, to extend the above referenced agreement. Although substantially complete, the project has one additional Phase to be completed that may possibly impact the street improvements. Therefore, we are requesting the extension of our Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to complete these improvements. Thank you for your assistance and prompt attention to this request. Sincerely, BURNETT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION C. Lynn Burnett President CLB:Imw Enclosure FOOTHILL BOULE'YARD .c~v~c ~.. ~> .~ .Iai A~ .OUT~ g SITE N CITY OF rr~ ~_~~~ n~cno cuc~o~A ~~ ENGINEEHINfl DIVe. ON RESOLUTION NO. ~'~ I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRCDR00-79 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cai forn a, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 15, 2005, by Burnett Development Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRCDR00-79; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Secudty be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R TM E N ~[ Staff Report DALE: June 15, 2005 TO' Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Service Tech I SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE PERIMETER IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY FIELDSTONE COMMUNITIES, INC. RECOMMENDATION: The required tract Perimeter Improvements for Tract 15814 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said perimeter improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the final Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15814, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The tract Perimeter Improvements have been completed and maintained and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond Perimeter (Highland, Lark & Rochester). Due to the lapse in time, no Maintenance Bond is required. Developer: Fieldstone Communities, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 3SM 917 396 00 $1,240,000.00 (Bond No.) The Faithful Performance Bonds for the Interior tract Improvements for Tract 15814 were released on April 7, 2004 and a Notice of Completion for the Interior tract Improvements was filed. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:TCH Attachment(s) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRACT PERIMETER IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the tract Perimeter Improvements for Tract 15814 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer /¢~.~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni~'ian ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-073 AS, COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $10,488,241.41 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001- 01, Contract No. 03-073, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $8,657,106.85 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $1,048,824.14, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $10,488,241.41. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001-01 along Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Arbor Lane and Victoria Park Lane scope of work consisted of constructing reinforced concrete box and pipe storm drain with appurtenant structures; street improvements including curb and gutter, asphalt concrete paving and base, medians, bus turnouts, traffic signals, safety lighting, signing and striping; water distribution system with appurtenant structures, sanitary sewer mains with appurtenafit structures; decorative lighting, landscaping and appurtenant structures. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: /55 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Phase 1BofCFD 2001-01 June 15, 2005 Page 2 > Budgeted Amount: $9,508,531.84 > Account Numbers: 16123035650/1442612-0 & 17053035650/1382705-0 > Engineer's Estimate: $10,389,021.90 ,~ City Council's Approval to Advedise: April 2, 2003 >' Publish dates for local paper: April 8 & 15, 2003 > Bid Opening: July 1, 2003 >- Contract Award Date: July 16, 2003 >' Low Bidder: Sully-Miller Contracting Company > Contract Amount: $8,644,119.85 > 10% Contingency: $864,411.99 >' Final Contract Amount: $10,488,241.41 > Difference in Contract Amount: $1,844,121.56 (21.33%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of seventy-one (71) contract change orders. Notable overages were Change Order No. 1 for nearly a half million dollars to have conduits for the City utility power grid and decorative lighting installed on Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road; Change Order No. 14 for $34,826.21 for water revisions to avoid conflicts on Victoria Park Lane; Contract Change Order No. 15 for $27,709.65 for sewer revisions to add five (5) additional sewer laterals on Day Creek Boulevard; Change Order No. 44 for $169,326 for asphalt concrete cap on Base Line Road, Church Street, Day Creek Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue previously to be constructed under a different contract; Change Order No. 58 for $63,000 for temporary traffic signals at the intersections of Victoria Gardens Lane and Day Creek Boulevard, and at North Mainstreet and Day Creek Boulevard; and various developer related change orders totaling approximately $400,000 to be reimbursed to the CFD by obligated developers. In addition, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility reimbursed approximately $405,719 and the City and RDA from other funding sources reimbursed approximately $170,680 for portions of the contract change order work. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01 EXHIBIT A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, CONTRACT NO. 03-073 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OFA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001-1, Contract No. 03-073, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. [ H E C I ¥ y OF I~AN C H O C U C A H O N C.A Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Street Maintenance Superintendent S~: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALS BONDS, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CITYWlDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 2 RECOMMENDATION The required street name sign replacements have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Per£ormance and Labor and Materials Bonds in the amount of $116,666. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, the bids for the Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2 project were received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, Sadie Construction, Inc. The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements at the above mentioned locations by: CONTRACTOR.: Sadie Construction, Inc. Release: Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds $ I 16,666.00 Respectfully submitte, d, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:GV:ju Attachment SOL' TIONNO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. ORDINANCE NO. 743 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. RECITALS (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that the City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii)The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit/mph) Speed Limit (mph) 1. Banyan Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Blvd. Not Posted 45 2. Banyan Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Etiwanda Avenue Not Posted 40 3. Church Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Blvd. Not Posted 45 4. Church Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Victoria Park Lane Not Posted 40 Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph) 5. Church Street, Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue Not Posted 40 6. Day Creek Blvd., Foothill Blvd. to Church Street Not Posted 45 7. Day Creek Blvd., Church Street to Base Line Road Not Posted 50 8. Day Creek Blvd., 1-210 Freeway to Banyan Street Not Posted 45 9. Day Creek Blvd., Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Not Posted 45 10. Ellena West, Base Line Road to Base Line Road Not Posted 35 11. Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue Not Posted 40 12. Milliken Avenue, Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Not Posted 45 13. Victoria Gardens Lane, Day Creek Blvd. to Church Street Not Posted 35 14. Victoria Park Lane, Church Street to Base Line Road Not Posted 45 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv)The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1/./2 T H E C I T Y © F I~^NC"° CUC^~O~C^ Staff'Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members ofth/e City Council Jack LaI~) A~dglanager FROM: Pamela ¢~ Deputy City Manager S~: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO TIlE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony on the proposed modifications to the facilities authorized to be financed by Community Facilities District (CFD) 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) ("CFD No. 2000-03"), the existing rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes authorized to be levied within CFD No. 2000- 03 and the existing bond authorization for CFD No. 2000-03 to finance the provision of certain public services and the acquisition o£ certain public facilities. During this hearing it is also recommended that the City Council take testimony regarding the proposed modifications. Immediately following the conclusion of the public hearing and assuming that a majority protest has not been filed regarding the proposed modifications, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution making determinations and authorizing submittal of propositions regarding the proposed modifications to the qualified electors of CFD No. 2000- 03 (the "Resolution Making Determinations"). Upon adoption o£the foregoing resolution, the City Clerk will need to canvas the ballot bom the landowner within CFD No. 2000-03. Upon completion o£ the canvas, the City Clerk will make an oral report o£the election results to the City Council. After the votes are canvassed, and if the propositions receive the affirmative vote of 2/3rds of the qualified electors voting in the election, then it is recommended that the City Council Page 2 June 15, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) approve the resolution declaring the results of the election, adopt a motion to introduce and waive the first reading of the ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax and approve the resolution approving the acquisition financing agreement between the City and the developer. These actions are brought to you in accordance with the request of the property owner and pursuant to City policy. BACKGROUND: CFD No. 2000-03 was originally formed at the request of Lennar Communities Inc., predecessor to Pulte Home Corporation ("Pulte"), the current owner of the property within CFD No. 2000-03. CFD No. 2000-03 was originally formed for the purpose of financing the acquisition of public improvements required for the development of Tract 14759 (Rancho Summit). The development in question is located south of Summit Avenue on the east and west sides of Wardman Bullock Road. Attached is a boundary map showing the exact boundaries of CFD 2000-03. When originally formed, CFD No. 2000-03 was authorized to finance park improvements including cleating and grading of such park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape (the "Authorized Facilities") as well as maintenance of the park sites to be developed within CFD No. 2000-03. Pulte has requested that the Authorized Facilities be modified to authorize CFD No. 2000-03 to also finance landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. in addition to the Authorized Facilities. Both the Authorized Facilities and the additional facilities will serve the residents in the northeast region of the community by providing three needed parks, park hardscape and restrooms; landscaping of the parks and parkways; and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more; beautification improvements along the public streets, and street improvements. In addition, this CFD will fund the maintenance for these parks and the public landscaping in this tract, much like the landscape maintenance districts we use in other parts of the City. In order to pay for the Authorized Improvements and the additional improvements as well as the park and parkway maintenance, Pulte has also requested that the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes authorized to be levied within CFD No. 2000-03 when originally formed (the "Existing RMA") be modified. The special taxes will be levied only on the properties in CFD No. 2000-03. The special tax, as proposed to be modified, will be based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential property. The proposed special tax rates are listed in Table 1 below. June 15, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) TABLE 1 Special Tax A Land Use Description Residential Floor Assigned Special Class Area Tax A* 1 Residential Property < 1,850 sq. ft. $1,707 per unit 2 Residential Property 1,850 - 2,049 sq. ft. $1,899 per unit 3 Residential Property 2,050 - 2,249 sq. ft. $2,027 per unit 4 Residential Property 2,250 2,449 sq. ft. $2,046 per unit 5 Residential Property 2,450 - 2,649 sq. ft. $2,061 per unit 6 Residential Property 2,650 - 2,849 sq. ft. $2,235 per unit 7 Residential Property 2,850 - 3,049 sq. ft. $2,462 per unit 8 Residential Property 3,050 - 3,249 sq. ft. $2,527 per unit 9 Residential Property 3,250 3,449 sq. ft. $2,677 per unit 10 Residential Property >-- 3,450 sq. ft. $2,696 per unit 11 Non-Residential Property NA $12,600 per Acre * The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A, identified in thc table above, shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. TABLE 2 Special Tax B Description Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax B* Final Residential Subdivision $945 per unit Final Non-Residential Subdivision $4,683 per Acre * On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. These rates for the proposed special taxes are consistent with thc City policy to insure that thc total taxes on any property do not exceed 2%. These special tax rates have been reviewed by Pulte and they arc in concurrence with the revised rate and method of apportionment for the special taxes. Page 3 June 15, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) TABLE 1 Special Tax A Land Use Description Residential Floor Assigned Special Class Area Tax A* 1 Residential Property < 1,850 sq. ft. $1,707 per unit 2 Residential Property 1,850 - 2,049 sq. ft. $1,899 per unit 3 Residential Property 2,050 - 2,249 sq. fi. $2,027 per unit 4 Residential Property 2,250 - 2,449 sq. ft. $2,046 per unit 5 Residential Property 2,450 2,649 sq. fi. $2,061 per unit 6 Residential Property 2,650 - 2,849 sq. ft. $2,235 per unit 7 Residential Property 2,850 3,049 sq. ft. $2,462 per unit 8 Residential Property 3,050 3,249 sq. fi. $2,527 per unit 9 Residential Property 3,250 - 3,449 sq. fi. $2,677 per unit 10 Residential Property >= 1,850 sq. ft. $2,696 per unit 11 Non-Residential Property NA $12,600 per Acre * The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A, identified in the table above, shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. TABLE 2 Special Tax B Description Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax B* Final Residential Subdivision $945 per unit Final Non-Residential Subdivision $4,683 per Acre * On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2006, thc Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. These rates for the proposed special taxes are consistent with the City policy to insure that the total taxes on any property do not exceed 2%. These special tax rates have been reviewed by Pulte and they are in concurrence with the revised rate and method of apportionment for the special taxes. Iq5 Page 4 June 15, 2005 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) Finally, in order to finance the facilities in question, it is necessary for CFD No. 2000-03 to incur a bonded indebtedness. The debt service for these bonds will be paid from the proceeds of the special tax levied in CFD No. 2000-03. No other property owners or residents will be responsible for this debt. When originally formed, the authorized bonded indebtedness for CFD No. 2000-03 was $3,000,000 (the "Existing Bond Authorization"). Pulte has requested that the total amount of authorized bonded indebtedness be increased to $10,000,000 in order to enable CFD No. 2000-03 to finance the Authorized Facilities as well as the additional facilities described above. In order to approve the proposed modification to the Authorized Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization, the qualified electors of CFD No. 2000-03, i.e., the property owners, need to vote on these matters. The Resolution Making Determinations contains the language of the ballot propositions. If the City Council decides to approve the Resolution Making Determinations then the matter will be put before the property owner for a vote. If the vote is successful, the City Council would then need to approve the resolution declaring the results of the election, introduce and waive the first reading of the ordinance authorizing the levy of the special tax pursuant to the revised rate and method of apportionment, and approve the resolution approving the Acquisition/Financing Agreement between the City and Pulte. After these actions, the staff will be authorized to levy the special taxes and sell the necessary bonds to see that these needed public facilities are financed and the park maintenance is provided. These actions are consistent with established City policy on CFD formations and comply with the necessary state regulations regarding these matters. Respectfully submitted, Pamela S. Easter Deputy City Manager Attachments: Map Resolutions Ordinance PROPOS'ED BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) CITY OF R~CHO CUCgMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT LOCATION TRACT 14759 INTERSTATE10 INDEX MAP ,._....,.,,,..___.. PROPOSED BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA · WARDIvlAN BULLOC~ ROAD PROFOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES OIS3~ICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMrr) BOUNDARY COUNTY DF ~AN 3ERNAR;D[ND, STATE OF' CALIFnRN~, AS PER PLAT REcnR~E9 IN BDDX c.u~T~, //.-~' - --~ -- HIGHLAND AVENUE SOLUTION NO. OS- 0 / RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY SUCH DISTRICT, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT AND THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR SUCH DISTRICT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF FOR SUCH DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI]7ORNIA (the "City Council") has previously undertaken proceedings to create and did establish a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District is referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District, voting in a special election held on October 11, 2000, approved the authorization to (a) finance park improvements including cleating and grading of such park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape (the "Authorized Facilities); (b) levy special taxes within the District pursuant to a rate and method of apportionment of such special taxes (the "Existing RMA") and (c) to incur a bonded indebtedness of the amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the "Existing Bond Authorization"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the District and such election, Pulte Home Corporation, the current developer of the property within the District, has requested that the City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, initiate proceedings to consider modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities to be financed fi:om the proceeds of bonds issued by the District which are secured by the levy of such special taxes, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, this City Council has adopted its Resolution No. 05-_ declaring its intention to consider modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, notice of a public heating to consider the proposed modifications has been given in the form and manner required by the Act; and WHEREAS, such public heating was held on Jure 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received from 50% or more of the registered voters residing within the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District to the proposed modifications or any one of them; and WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the District for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the questions of authorizing the modifications to the Authorized Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization to the landowners of the District, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS. It is determined by this City Council that: A. all proceedings related to the proposed modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. the proposed modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization conform with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities Districts; C. the Additional Facilities (as defined below) proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the District are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the District. D. written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing within the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District to the proposed modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities, (b) the Existing RMA or (c) the Existing Bond Authorization; E. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the 2 public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, slSall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the District; F. the public hearing regarding the proposed modifications as required by the Act was held on June 15, 2005; and G. the qualified electors have consented to the shortening of time for conducting the special election to present the questions to authorize the modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization, therefore, such special election may be conducted less than 90 days following the date of the public hearing to consider such modifications. SECTION 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE AFFECTED. The area to be affected by the proposed modifications to the Author/zed Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization is all of the District. SECTION 4. PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT. This City Council hereby approves, subject to the approval by the qualified electors of the District, the modification of the Authorized Facilities to authorize the District to finance the additional facilities set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Additional Authorized Facilities" and together with the Authorized Facilities, the "Modified Facilities"). SECTION 5. PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING RMA. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Modified Facilities, this City Council hereby approves, subject to the approval by the qualified electors of the District, changes to the Existing RMA to authorize the levy of special taxes within the District pursuant to the modified rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Modified P_MA") set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Such modified special taxes shall be secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property within the District, shall be levied annually therein, and shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, or in such other manner at this Board or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. Under no circumstances will the special tax levied against any parcel used for private residential purposes be increased by more than 10% as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels within the District. A parcel shall be considered "used for private residential purposes" not later than the date on which an occupancy permit or the equivalent for private residential use is issued for such parcel. The Modified RMA sets forth the conditions under which the special tax obligation for any parcel within the District may be prepaid and permanently satisfied in whole or in part. SECTION 6. PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING BOND AUTHORIZATION. This City Council hereby approves, subject to the approval by 3 the qualified electors of the District, the modification of the Existing Bond Authorization by increasing such authorization from $3,000,000 to $10,000,000 (the "Mod/fled Bond Authorization"). SECTION 7. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this City Council hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes described in Section 5 above: A. Such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes set forth in Section 5 above. B. The proceeds of the levy of such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5 above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of such special tax shall be deposited. D. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the City Council as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 8. BOND ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 53410) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, this City Council hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to any bonded indebtedness incurred by or on behalf of the District: A. Such bonded indebtedness shall be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the acquisition or construction of the Modified Facilities, appurtenances and appurtenant work and any and all of those applicable incidental costs described in and authorized by Government Code Section 53345.3. B. The proceeds of any such bonded indebtedness shall be applied only to the applicable specific purposes identified in paragraph A above. C. The document or documents establishing the terms and conditions for the issuance of any such bonded indebtedness shall provide for the creation of an account into which the proceeds of such indebtedness shall be deposited. D. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with this City Council as required by Government Code Section 53411. SECTION 9. ELECTION. The propositions to authorize the District to (a) finance the Additional Facilities, (b) levy special taxes within the District pursuant to the Modified RMA and (c) issue bonds secured by such special taxes in a principal amount not to exceed $10,000,000 shall 4 be submitted to the qualified electors of the District, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within the District. The special election shall be held on June 15, 2005 or such other date as the City Clerk, acting as the election official for such special election (the "Election Official"), and all of the qualified electors within the District may agree and consent. If the proposition to authorize the District to finance the Additional Facilities receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on such proposition, the District may finance the Additional Facilities as provided for in this Resolution. If the proposition to authorize the levy of the special tax pursuant to the Modified RMA receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on such proposition, the special tax may be levied pursuant to the Modified RMA as provided for in this Resolution. If the proposition to authorize the District to incur a bonded indebtedness for the District in an amount equal to the Modified Bond Authorization receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on such proposition, the District shall be authorized to incur such bonded indebtedness as provided for in this Resolution. SECTION 10. BALLOT. The ballot proposals to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A Shall City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), revise the facilities authorized to be financed by such District to finance additional facilities to include landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more? PROPOSITION B Shall City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), subject to the accountability measures set forth in Governmental Code Section 50075.1 and following, be authorized to levy a special tax therein pursuant to the amended and restated rate and method of apportionment as attached to the official ballot as Exhibit A thereto? PROPOSITION C Shall the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), subject to the accountability measures set forth in Government Code Section 53410 and following, be authorized to modify the existing bond authorization by increasing such authorization from $3,000,000 to $10,000,0007 SECTION 11. VOTE. The appropriate mark placed in the box before the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition voted upon, and the appropriate mark placed in the box before the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. 5 SECTION 12. ELECTION PROCEDURE. The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the District. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED FACILITIES · Landscaping of parks and parkways; and · Park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. /55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) EXHIBIT "B" AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES A Special Tax hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property in Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("CFD No. 2000-03") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, through the application of this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2000-03, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map. The square footage of an Assessor's Parcel is equal to the Acreage of such parcel multiplied by 43,560. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2000-03: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the Trustee; the costs of the Trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under the Indenture; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof of complying with arbitrage rebate requirements; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof of complying with disclosure requirements applicable to CFD No. 2000-03 and/or the City associated with applicable federal and state securities laws and of the Act; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; the costs associated with the release of funds from any escrow account; and the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advancedbythe City or CFD No. 2000-03 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2000-03, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. "Assessor's Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. "Assigned Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A for each Land Use Class of Developed Property as determined in accordance with Section C. 1 .(b). below. "Backup Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A applicable to each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in each Zone, as determined in accordance with Section C. 1 .(d). below. "Bonds" means any bonds or other debt (as defined in Section 53317(d) of the Act), whether in one or more series, issued by CFD No. 2000-03 under the Act. "CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities and the Special Tax Requirement for Services and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFD No. 2000-03" means City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "Consumer Price Index" means, for each Fiscal Year, the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2000-03. "County" means the County of San Bemardino. "Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property, for which the Final Subdivision was recorded on or prior to January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year and a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2004 and prior to March 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. /$7 "Final Subdivision" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual lots for which building permits may bc issued without further subdivision. "Fiscal Year" means thc period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indenture" means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 below. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable. "Maximum Special Tax A" means the maximum Special Tax A determined in accordance with Section C below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Maximum Special Tax B" means the maximum Special Tax B determined in accordance with Section C below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit permitting the construction of one or more non-residential units or facilities has been issued by the City. "Outstanding Bonds" means all Bonds which are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture. "Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, anyproperty within the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. "Proportionately" means, for Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Assigned Special Tax A is approximately equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and that the ratio of the actual Special Tax B levy to the Maximum Special Tax B is approximately equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property. For Undeveloped Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax A per Acre is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property. The term "Proportionately" may similarly be applied to other categories of Taxable Property as listed in Section D below. "Public Property" means property ~vithin the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 owned by, irrevocably offered or dedicated to, or for which an easement for purposes of public right-of- way has been granted to the federal government, the State of California, the County of San B-3 Bemardino, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or any local govermnent or other public agency, provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage of living area within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area. The determination of Residential Floor Area for an Assessor's Parcel shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit permitting the construction thereon of one or more residential dwelling units has been issued by the City. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B, as applicable. "Special Tax A" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities. "Special Tax B" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Services. "Special Tax Requirement for Facilities" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for CFD No. 2000-03 to: (i) pay debt service on all Outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year; (ii) pay periodic costs on the Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year; (iii) pay a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for all Outstanding Bonds; (v) pay for reasonably anticipated Special Tax A delinquencies based on the delinquency rate for the Special Tax A levy in the previous Fiscal Year; less (vi) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax A levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to the Indenture. "Special Tax Requirement for Services" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for CFD No. 2000-03 to: (i) pay the costs of park maintenance due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year as determined by the CFD Administrator; (ii) pay an amount necessary to fund an operating reserve for the costs of park maintenance; (iii) pay a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses; less (iv) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax B levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "State" means the State of California. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. B-4 /.~ "Taxable Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor's Parcels of Property Owner Association Property that arc not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E below. "Taxable Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor's Parcels of Public Property that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E below. "Trustee" means the trustee or fiscal agent under the Indenture. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. "Zone" means Zone 1 or Zone 2, as applicable. "Zone 1" means Assessor Parcel number 0226-102-13 (as designated on the County Assessor's Roll for Fiscal Year 2004-2005) and the land area geographically identified as Parcel A in Tentative Tract Map No. 14759 approved by the Planning Commission of the City on November 10, 1999. Zone 1 may be subject to amendment from time-to-time or modification pursuant to a final map or precise site plan for such property at the sole discretion of the CFD Administrator provided that such amendment Or modification will not reduce the amount of Maximum Special Tax A below the amount required to equal at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. "Zone 2" means the land area geographically identified as Parcel B-1, Parcel B-2, and Parcel C in Tentative Tract Map No. 14759 approved by the Planning Commission of the City on November 10, 1999. Zone 2 may be subject to amendment from time-to-time or modification pursuant to a final map or precise site plan for such property at the sole discretion of the CFD Administrator provided that such amendment or modification will not reduce the amount &Maximum Special Tax A below the amount required to equal at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and fin'ther classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property. Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment determined pursuant to Sections C and D below. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property containing mom than one Land Use Class shall be determined pursuant to Section C below. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX 1. Developed Property (a). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax A or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax A. The Maximum Special Tax B for each Land Use Class of Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the Maximum Special Tax A plus the Maximum Special Tax B. (b). Assigned Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Assigned Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property in City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Land Use Residential Floor Assigned Special Maximum Special Class Description Area Tax A Tax B 1 Residential Property < 1,850 s.f. $1,707 per unit $945 per unit 2 Residential Property 1,850 - 2,049 s.f. $1,899 per unit $945 per unit 3 Residential Property 2,050 - 2,249 s.f. $2,027 per unit $945 per unit 4 Residential Property 2,250 - 2,449 s.f. $2,046 per unit $945 per unit 5 Residential Property 2,450 - 2,649 s.f. $2,061 per unit $945 per unit 6 Residential Property 2,650 - 2,849 s.f. $2,235 per unit $945 per unit B-6 161 Land Use Residential Floor Assigned Special Maximum Special Class Description Area Tax A Tax B 7 Residential Property 2,850 - 3,049 s.f. $2,462 per unit $945 per unit 8 Residential Property 3,050 - 3,249 s.f. $2,527 per unit $945 per unit 9 Residential Property 3,250 - 3,449 s.f. $2,677 per unit $945 per unit 10 Residential Property => 3,450 s.f. $2,696 per unit $945 per unit 11 Non-Residential Property NA $12,600 per Acre $4,683 per Acre (c). Increase in the Assigned Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A, identified in Table 1 above, shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. On each July. l, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B listed in Table 1 above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six pement (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. (d). Backup Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 shall equal $9,601 per Acre or portion thereof. The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 shall equal $14,824 per Acre or portion thereofi The Backup Special Tax A applicable to Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. (e). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined /AZ by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a). Maximum Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $14,824 per Acre or portion thereof. (b). Maximum Special Tax B The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $4,683 per Acre or portion thereof. Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not. be subject to a Maximum Special Tax B. (c). Increase in the Maximum Special Tax The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property identified in Section C.2.(b). above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. Special Tax A Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities and shall levy the Special Tax A until the total Special Tax A levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities. The Special Tax A shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax A shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Propertyin an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax A; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax A on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 and Zone 2 whose Maximum Special Tax A is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax A shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax A up to the Maximum Special Tax A for each such Assessor's Parcel; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first three steps have been completed, then the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property. Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax A in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax A pursuant to steps two through four above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities; and (ii) all authorized Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2000-03. 2. SpecialTax B Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Services and shall levy the Special Tax B until the total Special Tax B levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Services. The Special Tax B shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year was located within a Final Subdivision, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the second step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year was not located within a Final Subdivision, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; E. EXEMPTIONS 1. Special Tax A No Special Tax A shall be levied on up to 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and up to 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax A under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax A and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the fourth step in Section D. 1 above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. 2. Special Tax B No Special Tax B shall be levied on Public Property and Property Owner Associatiofi Property in Zone 1 and/or Zone 2. F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the mount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2000-03. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the mount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes o£ clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. B-lO G. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax A and Special Tax B will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2000-03 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A The following additional definitions apply to this Section H: "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Year, all Outstanding Bonds that are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture after the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued, maybeprepaid. The SpecialTax Aobligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2000-03 may only be prepaid after all authoriz6d Bonds have already been issued, or after the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A levy under this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Parcel to pay any Special Tax A may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor's Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax A obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator may charge a reasonable fee for providing this service. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to the next occurring date that notice of redemption of Bonds from the proceeds of such prepayment may be given by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. The Special Tax B may not be prepaid. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond Redemption Amount plus Redemption Premium plus Defeasance Amount plus Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit less Capitalized Interest Credit Total: equals Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows: Para~ranh No.: 1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. 2. For Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Parcel. 3. (a) Divide the Assigned Special Tax A computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total estimated Assigned Special Tax A for CFD No. 2000-03 based on the Developed Property Special Tax A which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Parcels for which the Special Tax A has been prepaid, and (b) Divide the Backup Special Tax A computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total estimated Backup Special Tax A which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Parcels for which the Special Tax A has been prepaid. 4. Multiply the larger quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price-100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amotmt from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Year Special Tax A levy until the earliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Tax A levied on the Assessor's Parcel in the current Fiscal Year which has not yet been paid. 8. Add the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7. 9. Compute the net present value of the amount computed pursuant to paragraph 8, using as a discount rate the rate of return reasonably assumed for the conservative investment of these funds by the CFD Administrator (the "Defeasance Amount"). 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2000-03 are as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the larger quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund or account under the Indenture after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "CapitalizedInterest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax A prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9 and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 11 and 12 (the "Prepayment Amount"). From the Prepayment Amount, thc amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, 11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to retire Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments. The amount computed pursuant to paragraph 10 shall be retained by CFD No. 2000-03. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax A levy as determined under paragraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax A levy for such Assessor's Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Parcel for which the Special Tax A obligation is prepaid in full in accordance with this Section H, the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Special Tax A and the release of the Special Tax A lien on such Assessor's Parcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax A shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax A prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Tax A that may be levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 (after excluding 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2 as set forth in Section E) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Previously Issued Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. I. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax A shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, provided however that the Special Tax A will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined that all required interest and principal payments on the Bonds have been paid. The Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Services. SOLUTION NO. - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO AUTHORIZE MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES TO BE HNANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED AND THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council") has previously undertaken proceedings to create and did establish a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District is referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District, voting in a special election held on October 11, 2000, approved the authorization to (a) finance park improvements including cleating and grading of such park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape (the "Authorized Facilities); (b) levy special taxes within the District pursuant to a rate and method of apportionment of such special taxes (the "Existing RMA") and (c) to incur a bonded indebtedness of the amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the "Existing Bond Authorization"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the District and such election, Pulte Home Corporation, the current developer of the property within the District, has requested that the City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, initiate proceedings to consider modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities to be financed from the proceeds of bonds issued by the District which are secured by the levy of such special taxes, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, this City Council did initiate such proceedings and did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified electors of the District separate propositions relating to the proposed modification of the Authorized Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measures voted upon and each such measure did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified electors voting thereon, and this City Council desires to declare the results of the election in accordance with the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS. This City Council hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the City Clerk, acting in her capacity as the Election Official, said Statement identifying the measures voted upon and the number of votes given for and/or against the measures voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. ELECTION RESULTS. The City Clerk is hereby directed, pursuant to the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California, to enter in the minutes the results of the election as set forth in said STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. PASSED, APPROVED, And ADOPTED this day of June, 2005. AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk 2 Exhibit "A" CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) SPECIAL ELECTION in said City, held June 15, 2005. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measures in said District in said City, and the totals of the [espective columns and the totals as shown for the Measures are full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION A: YES NO ffI. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION B: YES NO IV. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION C: YES NO WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this day of June, 2005. CITY CLERK ELECTION OFFICIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 172. RESOLUTION NO. 05 - ~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-3 (RANCHO SUMMIT) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council") has previously undertaken proceedings to create and did establish a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District is referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITiES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District, voting in a special election held on October 11, 2000, approved the authorization to (a) finance park improvements including clearing and grading of such park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape (the "Authorized Facilities); (b) levy special taxes within the District pursuant to a rate and method of apportionment of such special taxes (the "Existing RMA") and (c) to incur a bonded indebtedness of the amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the "Existing Bond Authorization"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the District and such election, Pulte Home Corporation ("Owner"), the current owner and developer of the property within the District, has requested that the City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, initiate proceedings to consider modifications to (a) the Authorized Facilities to be financed from the proceeds bonds issued by the District which are secured by the levy of such special taxes, (b) the Existing RMA and (c) the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, this City Council did initiate such proceedings and did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified electors of the District separate propositions relating to the proposed modification of the Authorized Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, the qualified electors of the District approved the modification of the Authorized Facilities, the Existing RMA and the Existing Bond Authorization; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the purposes of the District, the City and the Owner have negotiated the terms and conditions pursuant to which the Authorized Facilities are to be acquired or constructed by the City and bonds are to be issued to finance the acquisition or construction of such Authorized Facilities and such terms and conditions have been memorialized in an Acquisition/Financing Agreement by and between the City and the Owner (the "Acquisition/Financing Agreement"), the form of which has been presented to this City Council for its consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2. The form of Acquisition/Financing Agreement, herewith submitted, is approved substantially in the form submitted. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute the final form of such agreement on behalf of the City. The City Manager or his designee, subject to the review of the City Attorney and Best Best & Kfieger LLP, Bond Counsel, are each authorized to approve changes in such agreement deemed to be in the best interests of the City, approval of such changes to be evidenced by the execution of such agreement. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day o£June 2005, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a charter city duly organized and validly existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, (the "City") acting for and on behalf of itself and COMMUNITY FACILITI~ES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), and PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation (the "Developer"). A. Pursuant to the request of Developer's predecessor, the City has formed a community facilities district under the terms and conditions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," as amended (Government Code Section 53311 and following) (the "Act"), for the purpose of financing the acquisition or construction of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the jurisdictional limits of such City, such community facilities district known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILIT1~ES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) (the "Community Facilities District"). B. The Developer, in order to proceed in a timely way with development of its property within that portion of the City known as Rancho Summit (the "Development"), desires to construct certain public improvements that are to be owned, operated and maintained by the City and that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, through the Community Facilities District, namely, the public improvements as set forth and described in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A" (each, an "Improvement"). C. An estimate of the cost of the Improvements is also set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. D. The City and Developer are in agreement that the Improvements may be acquired by the City through the Community Facilities District at prices and increments determined pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. E. It is the intent of this Agreement that Developer shall, upon the completion of the construction of the Improvements and the sale of bonds by the Community Facilities District, be entitled pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement to be paid for the Improvements at the prices as determined by the City pursuant to this Agreement. F. The City is willing to acquire the Improvements from Developer subject to the requirements of the Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities Districts adopted by the City Council (the "Goals and Policies") and this Agreement, and Developer desires that the City acquire such Improvements. NOW, TI~EREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED between the respective parties as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and co~ect. SECTION 2. Plans and Specifications. All plans, specifications and bid documents for the Improvements (the "Plans and Speci~cations") shall be prepared by the Developer at the Developer's initial expense, subject to City approval. The costs of acquisition of such Improvements shall 1 /75 include costs of the preparation of the Plans and Specifications and all related documentation as set forth in Section 7 below. Except as provided below, Developer shall not award bids for construction, commence construction or cause commencement of construction of an Improvement until the Plans and Specifications for such Improvement have been approved by the City. The foregoing requirement shall not apply to the bids previously solicited by Developer for the installation of the parkway landscaping or to the bids to be solicited by the Developer for the installation of the Park A landscaping or the construction of the Park A improvements so long as the Plans and Specifications for such improvements are approved by the City subsequent to the solicitation of bids for such improvements and the Developer complies with the provisions of Section 3 below pertaining to the award and construction of such Improvements. SECTION 3. Construction of Improvements. Developer covenants and agrees that each Improvement to be acquired from Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall be constructed A. in substantial compliance with the approved Plans and Specifications for such Improvement; B. in a good and workmanlike manner by well-trained adequately supervised workers; C. in strict compliance with all governmental and quasi-governmental rules, regulations, laws, building codes and all requirements of Developer's insurers and lenders; D. free of any material design flaws and defects; and E. in compliance with the requirements of this Section 3. Developer shall solicit or has solicited at least three (3) bids for the construction of such Improvements and shall award or has awarded the bid for the construction of such Improvements to the lowest responsible bidder. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall prohibit the Developer from including more than one Improvement in a single solicitation for bids. In the case where the Developer does include more than one Improvement in a single solicitation for bids, the Developer shall award the bid for the construction of such Improvements to the bidder submitting the lowest aggregate bid for the construction of such Improvements. The description of the Improvements in Exhibit A is preliminary and general in nature. The final nature and location of the Improvements will be determined upon the preparation of final Plans and Specifications. The description of the Improvements and their budgeted cost may be modified or Improvements substituted as long as the modified or substituted Improvements provide a service substantially similar to the Improvements currently described in Exhibit A. Any such modification or substitution shall be set forth in a supplement to Exhibit A approved by the City Engineer. SECTION 4. Inspection and Acceptance of the Improvements. The construction activities relating to the Improvements shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection by authorized representatives of City. Once the construction of an entire Improvement to be acquired by City is 1%, substantially completed in accordance with the approved Plans and Specifications (including any change orders reasonably approved by City), then such Improvement shall be eligible'for acceptance by the City for purposes of paying the Base Increment of the Pumhase Price (each term as defined in Section 7 below) for such Improvement. Prior to acceptance of any Improvement by City for purposes of paying the Retained Increment (as defined in Section 7 below) of the Purchase Price, the Developer shall provide to the City Engineer of the City, or his designee (the "City Engineer"), the documentation set forth in Section 7(c)(2) below and obtain approval of as-built drawings in accordance with the process described below in this Section 4. The Developer's engineer of record for the Improvement ("Engineer of Record") shall file a request with the City Engineer for a punchlist of any items which must he completed prior to payment of the Retained Increment. Within 20 working days of such filing, the field inspector of the City ("Field Inspector") shall issue and transmit to the Engineer of Record a letter requesting as-built drawings for such Improvement and a punchlist of any items which must be completed prior to payment of the Retained Increment. Within 20 working days of receipt of the Field Inspector's letter, the Engineer of Record shall prepare redline as-built drawings and submit them to the Field Inspector. Within 10 working days of the Engineer of Record's submittal, the Field Inspector shall review the redline as-built drawings and provide comments. The Engineer of Record shall revise the redline as-built drawings per the Field Inspector's comments and resubmit within 10 working days. The Field Inspector shall make his final review within 5 working days of the Engineer of Record's resubmittal and notify the Engineer of Record to prepare mylar as- built drawings and a microfiche copy and submit both to the City Engineer or his designee. The City and Developer shall make best efforts to perform within the time periods described above. The inability of City or Developer to perform within each time period, notwithstanding its best efforts, shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement. SECTION 5. Warranty of Improvements. Prior to payment of the Retained Increment of the Purchase Price for an Improvement, the Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the Improvement at the Developer's expense. The Developer shall be obligated for a period of twelve (12) months after the date City pays the Retained Increment to repair or replace any defects or failures resulting from the work of Developer, its contractors or agents. Upon the expiration of such twelve (12) month period, Developer shall assign to City and the Community Facilities District its rights in and to any warranties, guarantees or other evidence of contingent obligations of third persons with respect to such Improvement. As a condition precedent to the payment of the Retained Increment (as defined in Section 7 below) of the Purchase Price, Developer shall post a maintenance bond in a form reasonably approved by the City, cause a maintenance bond to be posted, or assign Developer's rights under such a bond naming City and/or the Community Facilities District as beneficiary in an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the Purchase Price of the Improvement in order to secure Developer's obligations pursuant to this Section. Such maintenance bond will be released upon the date which is 12 months past the date on which the City pays the Developer the Retained Increment for such Improvement. Upon posting of such maintenance bond, the City shall release any performance, labor and material bonds for such Improvement. The City shall provide the Developer with five (5) days written notice of any required 17q maintenance (unless such maintenance is required to avert an imminent threat to the public safety in which case such notice shall not be required) prior to making any demand or draw on the maintenance bond. In the event that the Developer initiates such maintenance within such five (5) day period and diligently completes such maintenance, the City shall not make a demand or draw on the maintenance bond. In the event that the City does make a demand or draw on the maintenance bond and the Developer nevertheless undertakes such maintenance at Developer's expense, any proceeds of such demand or draw shall be used to reimburse Developer for the expenses incurred by Developer in undertaking such maintenance. In addition, the City shall make a demand or draw on the maintenance bond to pay for the required maintenance of parks included among the Improvements only if and to the extent that the City has not received revenues from the levy of special taxes on property within the District owned by the Developer for the purpose of financing the maintenance of such parks. SECTION 6. Notice of Completion and Lien Releases. Developer shall notify the CityEngineer in writing upon completion of each of the Improvements to be acquired hereunder and shall prepare and execute a Notice of Completion for such Improvement in the form prescribed by Section 3093 of the California Civil Code and shall record such notice in the Official Records of the County of San Diego. Developer shall cause its contractors to provide unconditional lien releases for such Improvement or all Improvements thereof in accordance with Section 3262 of the Civil Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City may waive the requirement for a Notice of Completion and lien releases if City determines that as of the date of payment of the Retained Increment of the Purchase Price for an Improvement, title to such Improvement or portion thereof satisfies the requirements for Acceptable Title (as hereinafter defined). SECTION 7. Payment of Purchase Price. A. Amount of Purchase Price. The amount to be paid by City for the Improvements to be acquired 15om Developer (the "Purchase Price") shall, as to each such Improvement, (i) be determined by City in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7, (ii) equal the lesser of the cost or the value thereof, (iii) include the reasonable cost or value of eligible appurtenant public facilities, (iv) include the costs of the title insurance policy described in Section 9 (a), and (v) include all other costs of construction and incidental costs eligible under the Act and the Goals and Policies as a part of the cost of the Improvements, including the following: 1. Usual and customary design and engineering costs including civil engineering, soils engineering, landscape architecture, survey and construction staking, utility engineering and coordination, construction administration and supervision, plan check and inspection fees. 2. Costs of acquisition of off-site rights-of-way and/or easements including the following: a. Appraisal and title insurance costs; b. Costs ofprepahng acquisition plats; c. The appraised value or actual cost of right-of-way or easement, whichever is less. d. Legal fees and costs related to eminent domain proceedings approved by the City Attorney of the City (the "City Attomey"). 3. Costs of environmental review, permitting and mitigation related to the Improvement. In no event shall the cost or value of the construction of the Improvements be deemed to exceed the sum of the construction contract prices set forth in the contracts and change orders approved by City and the incidental expenses identified in paragraphs 1 through 3 above. B. Incremental Payment of Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for an Improvement shall be payable in not to exceed two increments: the "Base Increment" which shall be an amount not to exceed 85% of the Purchase Price for such Improvement and the "Retained Increment" which shall be an amount not to exceed the remaining, unpaid portion of the Purchase Price for such Improvement determined pursuant to the provisions of subsection A. above. C. Requisition for Incremental Payment of Purchase Price. 1. Base Increment. The Developer may submit a written request to the City Engineer for the payment of the Base Increment for an Improvement upon the substantial completion of the construction of such Improvement in accordance with the approved Plans and Specifications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, 100% of the Purchase Price of any grading Improvement shall be paid upon substantial completion of such work. The criteria for determining "substantial completion" of each Improvement is described in Exhibit A and shall mean generally that construction, or work with respect to the Improvement has progressed to the point where it is sufficiently complete so that the Improvement can be utilized for the purpose for which it was intended. Each Base Increment payment request must be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and conform to the requirements of subsection D. below. 2. Retained Increment. The Developer may submit a written request to the City Engineer for the payment of the Retained Increment for an Improvement upon the completion of such Improvement in accordance with the approved Plans and Specifications. Such Retained Increment payment request must be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C and conform to the requirements of subsection D. below and, unless previously provided to the City, must be accompanied by (1) evidence that the Developer has posted a maintenance bond for such Improvement as required by Section 5 hereinabove, and (2) evidence of the satisfaction of the requirements of Section 9, hereinbelow directly related to such Improvement. D. Documentation. Any payment request submitted by Developer shall be properly executed and shall include all supporting documents referred to in the payment request. E. Review of Payment Request. The City Engineer shall review each payment request. If the City Engineer finds that any such payment request is incomplete, improper or otherwise not suitable for approval, the City Engineer shall inform Developer in writing within twenty (20) working days after receipt thereof, the reasons for his finding. Developer shall have the right to respond to this finding by submitting further documentation and/or to resubmit the payment request within thirty (30) days after receipt of the denial. A resubmittal shall be deemed a new payment request for purposes of this Section. The City Engineer shall review any resubmitted payment request and inform Developer of his approval or denial of it in accordance with this Section within ten (10) working days after receipt of the resubmission. Costs incurred under a construction contract entered into pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement and pursuant to change orders approved by City shall be deemed to be reasonable. The City Engineer shall, after the sale of Bonds (defined in Section 18 below) pursuant to Section 18 and the receipt of the proceeds of such Bonds which are intended to be used to acquire the Improvements and after his or her approval of a payment request, immediately forward a request to the Finance Director of the City notifying the Finance Director of his or her approval of the payment request and requesting that such payment be made to the appropriate payee. The Finance Director shall process any such request of the City Engineer pursuant to the applicable procedures of the Finance Department and shall make or authorize such payment pursuant to such procedures and subsection F. below. F. Payment. The increment of the Purchase Price for each Improvement shall be paid to Developer within fifteen (15) days after the date of the City Engineer's approval of the payment request for any such Improvement; provided, however, no Retained Increment may be paid for any Improvement prior to (i) completion of all punch list items as specified in the letter from the Field Inspector to the Engineer of Record pursuant to Section 4 above, (ii) receipt of the maintenance bond as required pursuant to Section 5 above, (iii) the date which is thirty-five (35) days after the recording of a Notice of Completion for such Improvement as required pursuant to Section 6 above unless the requirement for such Notice of Completion has been waived by the City pursuant to such section, (iv) receipt of unconditional lien releases for such Improvement as required pursuant to Section 6 above unless the requirement for such unconditional lien releases has been waived by the City pursuant to such section and (v) receipt of Acceptable Title as required pursuant to Section 9 below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Purchase Price or any increment thereof shall not be due and payable to the Developer except to the extent of available funds solely from the proceeds of the sale of Bonds as provided in Section 18 hereof, after all costs of formation of the Community Facilities District and all costs of issuance of such Bonds have been paid and deposits of accrued and capitalized interest to the redemption fund and the initial deposit to the reserve fund have been made. Beyond the amount of such available proceeds, the City shall have no obligation to pay for the Improvements contemplated hereby. In addition to the foregoing, the City shall have the right to withhold payment of the Purchase Price or any increment thereof of any Improvement if(a) the Developer is delinquent in the payment of any assessment installments or special taxes levied by the City or a community facilities district established by the City on properties then owned by the Developer within the Coaununity Facilities District or (b) the City Engineer reasonably determines that the Developer is not then in substantial compliance with all applicable conditions and obligations imposed upon the Development pursuant to the land use entitlements approved by the City of the Development, including but not limited to, payment of all applicable fees, dedication of all applicable rights-of-way or other property and construction of all applicable public improvements. The City Engineer shall provide written notice to the Developer of the decision to withhold any such payment and shall specify the reason for such decision within five (5) business days of the later of(i) receipt of the applicable payment request or (ii) the date upon which the City Engineer is made aware of such delinquency or substantial non- compliance. If the payment is withheld as a result of the delinquency in the payment of assessment installments or special taxes, the notice shall identify the delinquent parcels and the amount of such delinquency. If the payment is withheld as a result of substantial non-compliance with a condition or obligation, the notice shall specify such condition or obligation and what action will be necessary by the Developer to substantially comply with such condition or obligation. Upon receipt by the City Engineer of evidence reasonably satisfactory to the City Engineer of the payment of the delinquent special taxes or assessments or upon the determination by the City Engineer that the Developer has substantially complied with the subject condition or obligation, the City shall forthwith make any payment which has been withheld pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph. SECTION 8. Audit. The authorized representatives of City shall have the right, upon two (2) days prior written notice to Developer and during normal business hours, to review all books and records of Developer pertaining to costs and expenses incurred by Developer in construction of the Improvements. SECTION 9. Ownership and Transfer of Improvements. The conveyance of the Improvements by Developer to City shall be in accordance with the following procedures: A. Improvements Constructed on Land not Owned by City. As a condition to the payment of the Retained Increment of the Purchase Price, Developer shall cause an irrevocable offer of dedication to be made to City or an outright grant of a fee interest or easement interest as appropriate, in the sole discretion of the City of the appropriate right, title and interest in and to the portion of the applicable property related to the applicable Improvement, including any temporary construction or access easements. Developer, whether or not it is the entity constructing the Improvements, agrees to execute and deliver to the City the documents required to complete the transfer of Acceptable Title. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Acceptable Title" shall mean title to the portion of the property to be conveyed free and clear of all taxes, liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, except those non- monetary encumbrances and easements which are reasonably determined by the City not to interfere with the intended use of the portion of the property. As a further condition to the payment of the Retained Increment of the Purchase Price for any Improvement, Developer at its sole cost and expense, subject to reimbursement pursuant to Section 7, shall cause to be issued a policy of title insurance for such portion of the property in an amount not to exceed the Purchase Price and in the form reasonably required by City in connection with the dedication of land for subdivision improvements and containing such title endorsements as may be reasonably requested by City. City's final acceptance of the portion of the property and the Improvements constructed thereon shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. B. Improvements Constructed on Land Owned by City. If Developer is authorized to construct an Improvement on land owned in fee by City or on land over which the City owns an easement Developer shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits to enter such land for purposes of constructing such Improvement. City shall cooperate with Developer in issuing such encroachment permits. The Improvements shall be inspected by City on an ongoing basis. 7 SECTION 10. Grading and Subdivision Improvement Bonds. Except as provided below, Developer shall be required to post bonds or other security acceptable to thc City to gnarantec completion of the Improvements in accordance with City's standard subdivision requirements and conditions of approval of thc Development (the "Conditions of Approval"). Performance and labor and material bonds for specific Improvements shall not bc required or may be released if: (1) such Improvements constitute a portion of the required subdivision improvements, (2) Bond proceeds to construct or acquire such Improvements arc available, and (3) the Improvements arc to bc constructed or acquired entirely with the proceeds of thc Bonds. Provided that conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied, if an Improvement is to bc constructed or acquired only in part with the proceeds of the Bonds, performance and labor and material bonds shall not be required for that portion of the Improvements to be so constructed or acquired except with respect to the portion that will not bc acquired or constructed with Bond proceeds. City will cooperate with Developer in the termination or exoneration of any performance and labor and material bonds assuring completion of Improvements for which bonds have been sold or in accordance with Section 5 above. SECTION 11. Indemnification by Developer. Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, directors, employees and agents, and the Community Facilities District, its officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, including court costs and reasonable attorneys fees by reason of, or resulting from, or arising out of the design, engineering and construction of the Improvements; provided that any claims which relate to the Improvements shall be limited to those arising out of personal injury or property damage caused by actions or omissions by Developer or Developer's employees, agents, independent contractors or representatives which occurred during the period prior to the transfer of title to the Improvements to the City, whether or not a claim is filed prior to the date of acceptance of the Improvements. Nothing in this Section 11 shall limit in any manner the rights of the City and/or the Community Facilities District against any of the architects, engineers, contractors or other consultants employed by the Developer which have performed work in connection with construction or financing of the Improvements. Except as set forth in this Section 11, no provision of this Agreement shall in any way limit the extent of the responsibility of Developer for payment of damages resulting from the operations of the Developer, its agents, employees or contractors. SECTION 12. Obligation of City. Except as provided in this Agreement, neither the City nor the Community Facilities District has a legal or financial obligation to construct or finance the actual construction of the Improvements. All costs incurred for actual construction of the Improvements, including all incidentals thereto, shall be borne by Developer. The obligations of the City are limited to the acquisition of the Improvements pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 13. Failure by Developer to Construct Improvements. At any time that the construction of the Improvements is not progressing within a reasonable time in accordance with the Conditions of Approval or the Developer fails to demonstrate a continuing ability to complete the construction of the Improvements in accordance with the Conditions of Approval, the City may give written notice of such failure of performance to the Developer. Developer shall have sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of such notice to cure such failure of performance by demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City during such cure period reasonable progress in the construction of the Improvements and a continuing ability to complete the construction of the Improvements in accordance with' the Conditions of Approval. Should Developer fail to satisfactorily demonstrate such reasonable progress or such continuing ability, this contract may be terminated by the City by providing ten (10) days written notice to the Developer. Upon termination, the City may in its sole discretion then proceed to advertise and bid the balance of the Improvements, and there will be no further obligation on the part of the City for payment due to Developer pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that the City chooses not to advertise and bid the balance of the Improvements following such a termination, any monies remaining in the improvement fund for the Community Facilities District and not appropriated or subject to appropriation for eligible expenses of the Community Facilities District previously incurred shall be transferred to the redemption fund for the Community Facilities District and used to call outstanding Bonds. SECTION 14. Agreement Contingent. This Agreement is contingent upon the successful sale of Bonds and it shall be null and void if such Bonds are not sold within a three (3) year period following the date of this Agreement, or any mutually agreed upon extension. The City may, at its option, suspend the performance of its obligations under this Agreement if any legal challenge is filed relating to the validity or enforceability of this Agreement, the Community Facilities District proceedings or the issuance of the Bonds. The obligations of the City hereunder shall be reinstated upon the entry of a final judgment in any such proceedings upholding the validity and enfomeability of the Agreement, the Community Facilities District proceedings and the issuance of the Bonds. In the event that a final judgment is entered invalidating or declaring unenforceable this Agreement, the Community Facilities District proceedings or the issuance of the Bonds, the City may, at its option, terminate this Agreement. SECTION 15. Notice of Special Tax. Developer, or the successor or assigns of the Developer, shall provide written notice to all potential pumhasers of lots in a form satisfactory to City so advising the potential owner of the existence of the Community Facilitie~ District and the levy of the special taxes, with such document being executed by the potential purchaser. Such notice shall be provided to the potential purchaser a reasonable time before the potential purchaser becomes contractually committed to purchase the lot so that the potential purchaser may knowingly consider the impact of the special tax in the decision to pumhase the lot. A copy of all such notices executed by actual purchasers shall be sent to the City Engineer. SECTION 16. Relationship to Public Works. This Agreement is for the construction and acquisition of certain Improvements by City and the sale of the Bonds for the payment of construction and acquisition costs for such Improvements and such other amounts as are herein provided, and is not intended to be a public works contract. In performing its obligations under this Agreement, Developer is an independent contractor and not the agent of City. City shall have no responsibility for payment to any contractor or supplier of Developer. SECTION 17. Sale of Bonds. The City shall initiate proceedings to issue and sell bonds secured by the levy of special taxes within the Community Facilities District (the "Bonds") to be issued pursuant to the Act only upon the receipt of a written request from the Developer that the Community Facilities District initiate proceedings to issue and sell such Bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds shall be used in the following priority to (i) fund a reserve fund for the payment of principal and interest with respect to the Bonds; (ii) fund capitalized interest on the Bonds in an amount not to exceed the amount required to pay interest on the Bonds until sufficient special taxes of the Community Facilities District are collected; (iii) pay for costs of issuance of the Bonds including, without limitation, underwriter's discount, bond counsel fees, printing, and paying agent fees; (iv) reimbursement for the costs of forming the Community Facilities District and undertaking the 15roceedings to modify the Improvements authorized to be financed by the Community Facilities District, the rate and method of apportion of the special taxes and the bond authorization; and (v) pay for the costs of the construction or acquisition of the Improvements pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The timing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds, the terms and conditions upon which the Bonds shall be issued and sold, the method of sale of the Bonds and the pricing of the Bonds shall be determined solely by the City and shall conform to the Goals and Policies and this Agreement. The sale of the Bonds shall be subject to receipt by the City of a competitively bid or negotiated bond pumhase agreement which is acceptable to the City. The aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed one-fourth (1/4) of the value of the property within the Community Facilities District subject to the levy of special taxes as determined by an independent appraisal undertaken for the City utilizing appraisal assumptions approved by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a value-to-lien ratio of less than 4:1 but equal to or greater than 3:1 may be approved, in the sole.discretion of the City Council, upon determination by the City Manager, after consultation with the Finance Director, the bond counsel, the underwriter and the financial advisor, that a value-to-lien ratio of less than 4:1 is financially prudent under the circumstances of the Community Facilities District. The City may, in its sole discretion, accept a form or forms of credit enhancement such as a letter of credit, bond insurance or the escrow of bond proceeds to offset a deficiency in the required value-to-debt ratio. The amount of the Bonds to be issued shall be determined in accordance with the Goals and Policies such that the maximum projected annual special tax revenues equal 110% of the projected annual gross debt service on the Bonds. Developer agrees to provide all information regarding the development of the property within the Community Facilities District, including the financing plan for such development, which is necessary to ensure that the official statement for such Bonds complies with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Rule") and all other applicable federal and state securities laws. Additionally, Developer agrees to enter into a continuing disclosure agreement to provide such continuing disclosure pertaining to the Community Facilities District, the development thereof and the Developer as necessary to ensure ongoing compliance with the continuing disclosure requirements of the Rule. SECTION 18. Conflict with Other Agreements. Except as specifically provided herein, nothing contained herein shall be construed as releasing Developer from any condition of development or requirement imposed by any other agreement with City. In the event ora conflicting provision, such other agreement shall prevail unless such conflicting provision is specifically waived or modified in writing by City. SECTION 19. General Standard of Reasonableness. Any provision of this Agreement which requires the consent, approval, discretion or acceptance of any party hereto or any of their respective employees, officers or agents shall be deemed to require that such consent, approval or acceptance not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, unless such provision expressly incorporates a different standard. SECTION 20. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement and the agreements expressly referred to heroin contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein and no prior or contemporaneous agreement or understandings, oral or written, pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived, amended or added to except by a writing signed by the party against which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment or addition is or may be sought. SECTION 21. Notices. Any notice, payment or instrument required or permitted by this Agreement to be given or delivered to either party shall be deemed to have been received when personally delivered or seventy-two (72) hours following deposit of the same in any United States Post Office in California, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Developer: Pulte Home Corporation[Developer] 1351 Pomona Road, Suite 200 Corona, California, 92882 Attn: Larry Craddick City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Attn: City Manager Each party may change its address for delivery of notice by delivering written notice of such change of address to the other party. SECTION 22. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenfomeable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. SECTION 23. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Developer may not assign its rights or obligations hereunder except upon written notice to City within ten (10) days of the date of such assignment indicating the name and address of the assignee. Upon such notice and the assumption by the assignee of the rights, duties and obligations of the Developer arising under or fi.om this Agreement, Developer shall be released by City from all future duties or obligations arising under or from this Agreement. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Developer may assign its ri~jats and obligations hereunder as security to lenders for the purpose of obtaining loans to finance development within the Community Facilities District, but no such assignment shall release Developer from its obligations hereunder to City. SECTION 24. Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State o f California, Additionally, this Agreement and the construction of the Improvements shall be subject to all City ordinances and regulations relating to the requirement of improvement agreements, land division, improvement security or other applicable development requirements. SECTION 25. Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by any other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights under the default of any other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by any other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. SECTION 26. Singular and Plural; Gender. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shall include the feminine. SECTION 27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. SECTION 28. Construction of Agreement. This Agreement has been reviewed by legal counsel for both the City and the Developer and shall be deemed for all purposes to have been jointly drafted by the City and the Developer. No presumption or rule that ambiguities shall be construed against the drafting party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. The language in all parts of this Agreement, in all cases, shall be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to achieve the objectives of the parties hereunder. The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of construction. Signature Page to Acquisition/Financing Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Pulte Home Corporation EXECUTED by and between the parties hereto on the day and year first hereinabove written. "CITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA "DEVELOPER" PULTE HOME CORPORATION A Michigan corporation By: Title: s_, EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND COST ESTIMATE June 6, 2005 Park Improvements (a) Total Park A $944,318 Park B 1,448,600 Park C 1,552,748 Sub Total 3,945,666 LMD Parkways (a) Engineering 16,000 Landscape (Irrigation, Shrubs, Trees, Turf, Maim. Period) 1,667,589 Park Entry Sign 16,340 Street Sidewalk 113,650 Grading (Rough, Fine, Soil Preparation) 269,330' 12' Wide Equestrian Trail 123,914 sub Total 2,206,823 Offsite Banyan Street (a) Engineering 121,305 Grading (Rough, Fine, Soil Preparation) 50,000 Water 333,490 Storm Drain 265,955 Street Improvements 209,256 Sub TotaI 980,006 Total Facilities $7,132,495 (a) Preliminary estimates per Pulte Homes budget, 10/13/04. EXHIBIT "B" BASE INCREMENT PAYMENT REQUEST NO. __ The undersigned (the "Developer") hereby requests payment in the total amount of $ for the Base Increment of the Purchase Price of the Improvements (as defined in the Acquisition/Financing Agreement by and among the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and Developer (the "Agreement") and described in Exhibit A to that Agreement), all as more fully described in Attachment 1 hereto. In connection with this Payment Request, the undersigned hereby certifies, represents and warrants to the City as follows: 1. He(she) is a duly authorized officer of Developer, qualified to execute this Payment Request for payment on behalf of Developer and is knowledgeable as to the matters set forth herein. 2. The Improvements that are the subject of this Payment Request have been substantially completed in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement. 3. The Purchase Price for the Improvements has been calculated in conformance with the terms of the Agreement. All costs for which payment is requested hereby are eligible costs (as permitted in the Agreement) and have not been inflated in any respect. The Base Increment for which payment is requested has not been the subject of any prior payment request paid by the City. 4. Supporting documentation (such as third party invoices, change orders and copies of checks or other evidence of payment) is attached with respect to each cost for which payment is requested. 5. The Improvements for which payment is requested were constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement. 6. Developer is in compliance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement. 7. Except as otherwise permitted pursuant to the Agreement, no mechanics liens or other encumbrances have attached, or to the best knowledge of Developer, after due inquiry, will attach to the Improvements. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above representations and warranties are true and correct. DEVELOPER: Dated: CITY Payment Request Approved for Submission to Finance Director City Engineer Dated: ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF PAYMENT REQUEST NO. __ Base Increment Description of Purchase Price Disbursement Improvement for Improvement Base Increment Requested [List here all Improvements for which payment is requested, and attach supporting documentation] EXHIBIT "C" RETAINED INCREMENT PAYMENT REQUEST NO. The undersigned (the "Developer") hereby requests payment in the total amount of $ for the Retained Increment of the Purchase Price of the Improvements (as defined in the Acquisition/Financing Agreement by and among the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and Developer (the "Agreement") and described in Exhibit A to that Agreement), all as more fully described in Attachment 1 hereto. In connection with this Payment Request, the undersigned hereby certifies, represents and warrants to the City as follows: 1. He(she) is a duly authorized officer of Developer, qualified to execute this Payment Request for payment on behalf of Developer and is knowledgeable as to the matters set forth herein. 2. Developer has submitted or submits herein to the City, if applicable, as-built drawings or similar plans and specifications for the Improvements and such drawings or plans and specifications, as applicable, are true, correct and complete. 3. The Purchase Price for the Improvements has been calculated in conformance with the terms of the Agreement. All costs for which payment is requested hereby are eligible costs (as permitted in the Agreement) and have not been inflated in any respect. The Retained Increment for which payment is requested has not been the subject of any prior payment request paid by the City. 4. Supporting documentation (such as third party invoices, change orders, lien releases and copes of checks or other evidence of payment) is attached with respect to each cost for which payment is requested. 5. The Improvements for which payment is requested were constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement. 6. Developer is in compliance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement. 7. No mechanics liens or other encumbrances have attached, or to the best knowledge of Developer, afler one inquiry, will attach to the Improvements. C-1 IqZ I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above representations and warranties are tree and correct. DEVELOPER: By: Dated: CITY Payment Request Approved for Submission to Finance Director City Engineer Dated: C-2 ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF PAYMENT REQUEST NO. Retained Increment Description of Base Increment Disbursement Improvement Purchase Price Previously Paid Requested [List here all Improvements for which payment is requested, and attach supporting documentation] C-3 ORDINANCE NO. ~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 643 AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000~03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) PURSUANT TO AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of thc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors authorizing the levy of separate special taxes within a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, previously enacted Ordinance No. 643 to authorize the levy of special taxes therein pursuant to a rate and method of apportionment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated proceedings, held a public heating, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors of the District authorizing the levy of special taxes therein pursuant to an amended and restated rate and method of apportionment thereofi TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA, California, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council does, by thc passage of this ordinance, authorize the levy of special taxes on taxable properties located in the District pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Amended and Restated Rate and Method"). SECTION 2. This City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, is hereby further authorized, by Resolution, to annually determine the special tax to be levied within the District for the then current tax year or future tax years; provided, however, the special tax to be levied therein shall not exceed the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Amended and Restated Rate and Method. SECTION 3. The special taxes herein authorized to be levied within the District, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, 'procedure, sale and lien priority'in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, the District may utilize a direct billing procedure for any special taxes that cannot be collected on the County tax roll or may, by resolution, elect to collect the special taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations. SECTION 4. The special taxes authorized to be levied in the District shall be secured by the lien imposed pursuant to Sections 3114.5 and 3115.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, which lien shall be a continuing lien and shall secure each levy of the special tax. The lien of the special tax shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied and canceled in accordance with Section 53344 of the Government Code of the State of California or until the special tax ceases to be levied by the City Council in the manner provided in Section 53330.5 of said Government Code. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall, upon becoming effective, amend and supercede any and all provisions of Ordinance No. 643 pertaining to the authorization to levy special taxes within the District. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk 2 EXHIBIT A AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) A Special Tax hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property in Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("CFD No. 2000-03") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, through the application of this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2000-03, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map. The square footage of an Assessor's Parcel is equal to the Acreage of such parcel multiplied by 43,560. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2000-03: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the Trustee; the costs of the Trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under the Indenture; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof Of complying with arbitrage rebate requirements; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof of complying with disclosure requirements applicable to CFD No. 2000-03 and/or the City associated with applicable federal and state securities laws and of the Act; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2000-03 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; thc costs associated with the release of funds ~rom any escrow account; and the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2000-03 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2000-03, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. "Assessor's Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. "Assigned Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A for each Land Use Class of Developed Property as determined in accordance with Section C. 1.(b). below. "Backup Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A applicable to each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in each Zone, as determined in accordance with Section C. 1.(d). below. "Bonds" means any bonds or other debt (as defined in Section 53317(d) of the Act), whether in one or more series, issued by CFD No. 2000-03 under the Act. "CFI) Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities and the Special Tax Requirement for Services and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFI) No. 2000-03" means City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga. "Consumer Price Index" means, for each Fiscal Year, the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2000- 03. "County" means the County of San Bemardino. "Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property, for which the Final Subdivision was recorded on or prior to January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year and a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2004 and pr/or to March 1 of the pr/or Fiscal Year. A~2 "Final Subdivision" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indenture" means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 below. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable. "Maximum Special Tax A" means the maximum Special Tax A determined in accordance with Section C below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Maximum Special Tax B" means the maximum Special Tax B determined in accordance with Section C below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit permitting the construction of one or more non-residential units or facilities has been issued by the City. "Outstanding Bonds" means all Bonds which are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture. "Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. "Proportionately" means, for Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Assigned Special Tax A is approximately equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and that the ratio of the actual Special Tax B levy to the Maximum Special Tax B is approximately equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property. For Undeveloped Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax A per Acre is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property. The term "Proportionately" may similarly be applied to other categories of Taxable Property as listed in Section D below. "Public Property" means property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 owned by, irrevocably offered or dedicated to, or for which an easement for purposes of public right-of-way has been granted to the federal government, the State of Califomia, the County of San A-3 /'lq Bernardino, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or any local government or other public agency, provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage of living area within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area. The determination of Residential Floor Area for an Assessor's Parcel shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit permitting the construction thereon of one or more residential dwelling traits has been issued by the City. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B, as applicable. "Special Tax A" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities. "Special Tax B" means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Services. "Special Tax Requirement for Facilities" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for CFD No. 2000-03 to: (i) pay debt service on all Outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year; (ii) pay periodic costs on the Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year; (iii) pay a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for all Outstanding Bonds; (v) pay for reasonably, anticipated Special Tax A delinquencies based on the delinquency rate for the Special Tax A levy in the previous Fiscal Year; less (vi) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax A levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to the Indenture. "Special Tax Requirement for Services" means that amonnt required in any Fiscal Year for CFD No. 2000-03 to: (i) pay the costs of park maintenance due in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year as determined by the CFD Administrator; (ii) pay an amount necessary to fund an operating reserve for the costs of park maintenance; (iii) pay a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses; less (iv) a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax B levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "State" means the State of California. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2000-03 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. ^-4 "Taxable Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor's Parcels of Property Owner Association Property that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E below. "Taxable Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor's Parcels of Public Property that are not exempt fi.om the Special Tax pursuant to Section E below. "Trustee" means the trustee or fiscal agent under the Indenture. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. "Zone" means Zone 1 or Zone 2, as applicable. "Zone 1" means Assessor Parcel number 0226-102-13 (as designated on the County Assessor's Roll for Fiscal Year 2004-2005) and the land area geographically identified as Parcel A in Tentative Tract Map No. 14759 approved by the Planning Commission of the City on November 10, 1999. Zone 1 may be subject to amendment fi.om time-to-time or modification pursuant to a final map or precise site plan for such property at the sole discretion of the CFD Administrator provided that such amendment or modification will not reduce the amount of Maximum Special Tax A below the amount required to equal at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. "Zone 2" means the land area geographically identified as Parcel B-l, Parcel B-2, and Parcel C in Tentative Tract Map No. 14759 approved by the Planning Commission of the City on November 10, 1999. Zone 2 may be subject to amendment from time-to-time or modification pursuant to a final map or precise site plan for such property at the sole discretion of the CFD Administrator provided that such amendment or modification will not reduce the amount of Maximum Special Tax A below the amount required to equal at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment determined pursuant to Sections C and D below. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. The Maximum Special Tax for Residential Property shall be based on the Residential Floor Area of the dwelling unit(s) located on the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for Non- Residential Property shall be based on the Acreage of the Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property containing more than one Land Use Class shall be determined pursuant to Section C below. A-5 C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX 1. Developed Property (a). Maximum Special Tax Thc Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax A or (ii) thc amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax A. The Maximum Special Tax B for each Land Use Class of Developed Property is shown below in Table 1. The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be thc Maximum Special Tax A plus the Maximum Special Tax B. (b). Assigned Special Tax A Thc Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A for each Land Usc Class is shown below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Assigned Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property in City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Land Use Residential Floor Assigned Special Maximum Special Class Description Area Tax A Tax B 1 Residential Property < 1,850 s.fi $1,707 per unit $945 per unit 2 Residential Property 1,850 - 2,049 s.f. $1,899 per unit $945 per unit 3 Residential Property 2,050 2,249 s.f. $2,027 per unit $945 per unit 4 Residential Property 2,250 2,449 s.f. $2,046 per unit $945 per unit 5 Residential Property 2,450 2,649 s.fi $2,061 per unit $945 per unit 6 Residential Property 2,650 - 2,849 s.fi $2,235 per unit $945 per unit 7 Residential Property 2,850 - 3,049 s.f. $2,462 per unit $945 per unit 8 Residential Property 3,050 - 3,249 s.f. $2,527 per unit $945 per unit 9 Residential Property 3,250 - 3,449 s.f. $2,677 per unit $945 per unit 10 Residential Property => 3,450 s.f. $2,696 per unit $945 per i~nit 11 Non-Residential Property NA $12,600 per Acre $4,683 per Acre (c). Increase in the Assigned Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Assigned Special Tax A, identified in Table 1 above, shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B listed in Table 1 above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. (d). Backup Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 shall equal $9,601 per Acre or portion thereof. The Fiscal Year 2005q2006 Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 shall equal $14,824 per Acre or portion thereof. The Backup Special Tax A applicable to Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. (e). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Pamel. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. 2. Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property (a). Maximum Special Tax A The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $14,824 per Acre or portion thereof. (b). Maximum Special Tax B The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 or Zone 2 shall be $4,683 per Acre or portion thereof. Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not be subject to a Maximum Special Tax B. A-7 (c). Increase in the Maximum Special Tax The Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property, Taxable Public Property, and Taxable Property Owner Association Property shall not be subject to change and shall therefore remain the same in every Fiscal Year. On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2006, the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property identified in Section C.2.(b). above shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. Special Tax A Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities and shall levy the Special Tax A until the total Special Tax A levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities. The Special Tax A shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax A shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax A; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax A on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 and Zone 2 whose Maximum Special Tax A is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax A shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax A up to the Maximum Special Tax A for each such Assessor's Parcel; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities after the first three steps have been completed, then the Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property and Taxable Property Owner Association Property. Notwithstanding the above the Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax A in step one (above), when (i) the Council is no longer required to levy the Special Tax A pursuant to steps two through four above in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Facilities; and (ii) all authorized Bonds have already been issued or the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2000-03. 2. Special Tax B Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for Services and shall levy the Special Tax B until the total Special Tax B levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for Services. The Special Tax B shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year was located within a Final Subdivision, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for Services after the second step has been completed, the Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year was not located within a Final Subdivisiofl, at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property; E. EXEMPTIONS 1. Special Tax A No Special Tax A shall be levied on up to 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and up to 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Public Property or Property Owner Association Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. Public Property or Property Owner Association Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax A under this section shall be subject to the levy of the Special Tax A and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the fourth step in Section D.1 above, at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owner Association Property. ^-9 2. Special Tax B No Special Tax B shall be levied on Public Property and Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and/or Zone 2. F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident who feels that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in error may submit a written appeal to CFD No. 2000-03. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal and if the CFD Administrator concurs, the amount of the Special Tax levied shall be appropriately modified. The Council may interpret this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment for purposes of clarifying any ambiguity and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals. Any decision of the Council shall be final and binding as to all persons. G. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax A and Special Tax B will be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that CFD No. 2000-03 may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A The following additional definitions apply to this Section H: "Previously Issued Bonds" means, for any Fiscal Year, all Outstanding Bonds that are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture afier the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year. Only an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued, may be prepaid. The Special Tax A obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2000-03 may only be prepaid afier all authorized Bonds have already been issued, or afier the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by the Special Tax A levy under this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. The obligation of the Assessor's Parcel to pay any Special Tax A may be permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor's Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax A obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount for such A-lO Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator may charge a reasonable fee for providing this service. Prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to the next occurring date that notice of redemption of Bonds from the proceeds of such prepayment may be given by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. The Special Tax B may not be prepaid. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond Redemption Amount plus Redemption Premium plus Defeasance Amount plus Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit less Capitalized Interest Credit Total: equals Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows: Paragraph No.: 1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel. 2. For Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid. For Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property for which building permits have already been issued, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel to be prepaid as though it were already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has been issued for that Assessor's Parcel. 3. (a) Divide the Assigned Special Tax A computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total estimated Assigned Special Tax A for CFD No. 2000-03 based on the Developed Property Special Tax A which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Parcels for which the Special Tax A has been prepaid, and (b) Divide the Backup Special Tax A computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total estimated Backup Special Tax A which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development in CFD No. 2000-03, excluding any Assessor's Parcels for which the Special Tax A has been prepaid. 4. Multiply the larger quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the Previously Issued Bonds to compute the amount of Previously Issued Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the "Bond Redemption Amount"). A-11 5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption .premium (e.g., the redemption price-100%), if any, on the Previously Issued Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium"). 6. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date not covered by the current Fiscal Year Special Tax A levy until the earliest redemption date for the Previously Issued Bonds. 7. Determine the Special Tax A levied on the Assessor's Parcel in the current Fiscal Year which has not yet been paid. 8. Add the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 7. 9. Compute the net present value of the amount computed pursuant to paragraph 8, using as a discount rate the rate of return reasonably assumed for the conservative investment of these funds by the CFD Administrator (the "Defeasance Amount"). 10. The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2000-03 are as calculated by the CFD Administrator and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses"). 11. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a) the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture), if any, associated with the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of Previously Issued Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. No Reserve Fund Credit shall be.granted if the amount then on deposit in the reserve fund for the Previously Issued Bonds is below 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture). 12. If any capitalized interest for the Previously Issued Bonds will not have been expended as of the date immediately following the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the larger quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund or account under the Indenture after such first interest and/or principal payment (the "Capitalized Interest Credit"). 13. The Special Tax A prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9 and 10, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs ! 1 and 12 (the "Prepayment Amount"). A-12 From the Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 9, 11 and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to retire Previously Issued Bonds, as applicable, or make scheduled debt service payments. The amount computed pursuant to paragraph 10 shall be retained by CFD No. 2000-03. The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount may be insufficient to redeem a full $5,000 increment of Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of Bonds or to make scheduled debt service payments on such bonds. Upon confirmation of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax A levy as determined under paragraph 7 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax A levy for such Assessor's Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Parcel for which the Special Tax A obligation is prepaid in full in accordance with this Section H, the Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Special Tax A and the release of the Special Tax A lien on such Assessor's Parcel, and the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax A shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax A prepayment shall be allowed unless, at the time of such proposed prepayment, the amount of Maximum Special Tax A that may be levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 2000-03 (after excluding 21.88 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 1 and 38.41 Acres of Public Property and/or Property Owner Association Property in Zone 2 as set forth in Section E) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Previously Issued Bonds, plus the Administrative Expenses. I. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax A shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, provided however that the Special Tax A will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined that all required interest and principal payments on the Bonds have been paid. The Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to meet the Special Tax Requirement for Services. A-13 R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PART,lENT Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ,X~ ~ SUBJECT: PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL STATUS AND REJECTION OF ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVE. TO ARCHIBALD AVE. (PHASE II) AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reject all the bids received for The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Ave. to Archibald Ave. (Phase II) as non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Pacific Electric Trail is approximately 7 miles in length and part of the larger bi-county project that utilizes historic Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way to develop 26 miles of 'rai~ trail' and 'rail~ with-trail, which when complete will provide a premier regional bicycle and pedestrian trail for commuting and recreation; linking San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties, and ten cities serviced by the corridor. The corridor through Rancho Cucamonga is currently broken into four phases. Phase I - Haven Avenue to east of Etiwanda Avenue; Phase II - Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue; Phase III - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue; and Phase IV - Grove Avenue to Amethyst Avenue. For the segment between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Phase II), per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 31, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $562,446.70. All bids received significantly exceeded the Engineer's Estimate and budgeted amount. It should be noted, this phase is mostly funded through a grant received from the Bicycle Transportation Account. As mentioned above, Phase II of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail is just one of four phases which will construct throughout the City. Phase III, between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue will be the next phase staff will advertise for construction. At that time, this Phase II will be re- advertised for construction with Phase III. Staff believes the economy of scale of a larger project CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Pacific Electriclnland Empire Trail June 15, 2005 Page 2 should realize lower unit costs. Even though the two phases are funded through different outside sources, staff can account for the two phases separately. Construction for Phase II and Phase III is expected to commence in January of 2006. Construction is expected to take no more than five (5) months. Respectfully submitted, Will- ~m~J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WS/RO:Is BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 31, 2005 Apparent Low Bidder Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction l¥om ENGINEERS Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase 2) ESTIMATE CS Legacy Construction, Inc. Grand Pacific Contractors, Inc. UNIT i UNIT ! BID ICORRECTED UNIT [ BID CORRECTED N© QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT ] AMOUNT COST i AMOUNT AMOUNT I. I LS Clearing and Grubbing S4~000.001 $4?000.0G $6]7180.001 $617180.001 S617180.00 $2,000.001 $2~000.001 $2~000.00 2. 2614 SF Remove A.C. Pavement $5.00 $13~070.00 $1.501 $3,921.00[ $3~921.00 $1.501 $3~921.001 $3,921.00 3. 281 SF Remove P.C.C. Pavement $ .00 $3~091.00 $3.00 $843.00 $843.00 $1.501 $421.501 $421.50 4. 97 LF Remove P.C.C. Curb and Gutter $11.00[ $1~067.00 $8.00 $776.001 $776.00 $9.00[ $873.00 $873.00 5. 100 LF Remove P.C.C. Curb $5.00 $500.00 $8.001 $800.0C $800.00 $9.00 $900.00 $900.00 6. 70 SF Remove P.C.C. Drive Approach $ .00 $770.00 $11.00 $770.001 $770.00 $2.00 $140.00 $140.00 7. 631 SF Remove P.C.C. Sidewalk $11.00 $6~941.00 $2.00 $1 ~262.0C $1 ~262.00 $1.50 $946.50i $946.50 8. 600 CY Unclassified Excavation $20.00 $127000.00 $36.00 $21~600.00 $21,600.00 $20.001 $12,000.001 $12~000.00 9. 13( CY Unclassified Fill $15.001 $1,950.00 $40.001 $5?200.00 $5~200.00 $20.001 $2,600.00[ $2~600.00 10. 16~ LF Channel Excavation $2.50 $415.00 $8.00 $1~328.001 $1,328.00 $19.001 $3,154.001 $3~154.00 I1. 7~ LF Remove Stone Wall $8.00 $560.00 $ .00 $770.00 $770.00 $9.00 $630.00 $630.00 12. 413~ SF Remove Landscaping & Parking Area $3.001 $12~390.00 $0.301 $17239.00 $1,239.00 $3.50 $147455.00 $14~455.00 13. 232 LF Remove Rail $10.00 $21320.00 $6.00 $1~392.00 $17392.00 $20.00 $4,640.001 $4,640.00 I4. 3 EA Remove Post $50.00 $150.0( $300.00 $900.001 $900.00 $50.001 $150.00[ $150.00 15. 500 LF Saw cuttin~ $10.001 $5,000.0( $2.50 $1~250.00l $1,250.001 $1.501 $750.001 $750.00 16. 24 CY Crushed Ag~'egate Base $50.001 $1~200.0( $49.00[ $1,176.001 $1,176.0( $20.001 $480.001 $480.00 17 2 EA Surface Coating for Manholes $500.001 $1,000.0( $769.00 $1~538.00 $17538.0£ $500.001 $1~000.001 $1~000.00 18 80 TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $80.001 $6?400.0( $121.00 $9,680.00 $9~680.0£ $157.40 $12~592.001 $12~592.00 19 422 LF Zold Plane (5' Widc) $25.00] $10~550.0( $8.00 $3,376.001 $3~376.0£ $15.31 $6~460.82l $6,460.82 20 16819 SF P.C.C. Pavement $6.00 $100~914.0( $2.75[ $46,252.251 $46~252.25 $4.45 $747844.551 $74,844.55 21. 2 EA Adiust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $250.00 $500.0£ $600.00 I $1,200.00 $1 r200.0~ $500.001 $1~000.001 S 1~000.00 22. 212 SF Decomposed Granite Trail $21.501 $4~558.0( $121.00 $25,652.00 $25~652.0~ $37.501 $7,950.00 $7~950.00 23. 1 LS 3' X 1' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert $4r300.00 $4~300.0£ $6~000.00 $6~000.00 $6,000.0C $7,000.00[ $7~000.00 $77000.00 24. 1333 SF River Washed Granite Cobblestones $ 4.00 $18~662.0C $8.00 I $107664.001 $10~664.0~ $45.001 $59,985.00 $59,985.00 25. 15 EA River Washed Granite Boulders $1S0.00l $2~250.0C $148.00 $2~220.001 $2~220.00 $4oo.ool $6~000.00 $6~000.00 26. l0 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb $15.001 $150.0~ $6 .00 $610.00 $610.00 $21.851 $218.50 $218.5( 27. 266 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $22.001 $5~852.013 $23.00 I $6,118.00 $6,1 I8.00 $27.60 $7~341.60 $7~341.6( 28. 38 SF 8" P.C.C. Drive Approach $5.50 $209.01~ $53.00 ' $2~014.00 $2,014.00 $5.25 $199.50 $199.5( 29. 1984 SF 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $5.00 $9~920.00 $4.00 $71936.00 $71936.00 $4.50 $81928.001 $8,928.0( 30. 785 SF P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramps $11.001 $8~679.00 $9.00 $7~101.00 $7~101.00 $5.551 $4~378.951 $4~378.95 31. 3255 LF P.C.C. Concrete Header $15.00 $481825.00 $I0.00 $321550.00 $321550.00 $11.651 $37,920.751 $371920.75 32. 171~ LF Relocate Existing Fence $ 6.00 $2,720.00 $36.00 $61120.00 $61120.00 $39.101 $6,647.00[ $6~647.0£ · ~33. 56C~ LF Tubular Steel Fence $40.001 $22,400.00 $118.00 $66,080.001 $66,080.00 $134.551 $75~348.001 $75t348.0C Sheet IA I UNIT I UNIT BID ]CORRECTED~ UNIT ] BID CORRECTED NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST [ AMOUNT COST AMOUNT i AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT AMOUNT 34. LS 2" Water Service Connection Assembly $4,300.001 $4~300.01 $5,380.00 I $5,380.001 $5,380.00 $1,495.00 I $1,495.001 $1,495.00 35. LS 3" Water Service Connection Assembly $7~300.00! S7,300.0( $5,477.00 I $5,477.001 $5,477.001 $1,725.00 [ $1,725.001 $1,725.00 36. LS Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Archibald Ave. S66,000.00[ $66.000.0( $142,193.00 [ $142,193.001 $142,193.0£ $137~556.10 I $137,556.101 $137~556.10 37. LS Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Amethyst Ave. $30~000.00l $30,000.0( $52~251.00 [ $52,251.001 $52,251.0( $50,547.10 [ $50,547.101 $50,547.10 38. 2 EA Street Identification Signs and Pilasters $7,500.00[ $15~000.01 $11r886.00 $11~886.001 $23~772.0£ $1r200.00 [ $2,400.00[ $2~400.00 39. 6915 SF lnstall Ground Cover $o.451 $3,111.7: $0.70 $4,840.50[ $4,840.5C $1.15 I $7,952.251 $7~952.25 40. LS Automatic Irrigation System $45,690.00 $45,690.0( $657510.00 I $65~510.001 $65,510.01 $85,502.50 I $82,502.501 $85,5o2.5o 41 6915 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.20 S1,383.01 $0.70 I $4,840.501 $4,840.5( $1.45 $10,026.751 $107026.75 42. LS Maintenance Period $700.001 $700.0( $5,210.00 I S5,210.00 $5,210.01 $3,450.00 $3~450.00[ $37450.00 43. 145 EA Gallon Shrubs S6.501 $942.51 $15.00 I $2~175.00 $27175.01 $11.50 $1,667.50[ $1,667.50 44. 175 EA Gallon Shrubs $22.751 $3~981.25 $19.00 $3,325.00 $37325.01 $28.75 $5,031.25[ $5~031.25 45. 17 EA 24" Box Tree $275.00 $47675.01 $397.00 $6~749.00 $6~749.01 $345.00 I $5~865.001 $5?865.00 46 86 CY Bark Mulch $ 4.00 $1,204.01 $28.00 $2,408.001 $2,408.0(; $109.25 I $9~395.501 $91395.50 47 2 EA Install Temporary Pro, iect Construction Signs $17000.001 $2,000.0( $531.00 I $1~062.001 $1,062.0C $150.00 [ $300.0C $300.00 48 I EA Install Permanent Interpretive Sign $2,500.001 $2~500.01 $1~065.00 I $17065.00 $1~065.0C $500.00 I $500.01] $500.00 49. 2472 SF Remove Existing Markings and Stripings $2.50 $6~180.01 $2.60 $6~427.20 $6~427.21] $2.50 I $6~180.01] $6,180.00 50. 1700 LF Fraffic Striping $0.45 $765.0C $3.22 $57474.00 $5~474.0C $0.45 I $765.01] $765.00 51. 1 LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.0C $3:762.00 $3,762.001 $37762.01] $5,000.00 I $5,000.01] $5~000.00 52. 12 EA Traffic Signs $150.001 $1~800.01] $267.00 i $3,204.001 $3,204.01] $500.00 I $6~000.00 $6?000.00 53. 690 SF Pavement Markings $2.001 $1~380.01] $1.70 I $¥73.00 $1~173.01] $5.00 $3~450.00 $3~450.00 54. 5 EA Removable Posts $400.00 $2~000.01] $276.00 [ $17380.00 $1,380.01] $500.00 $2,500.001 $2~500.00 55. 1 EA Relocate Sign $100.00 $100.01] $692.00 i $692.00 $692.01] $250.00 $250.001 $250.00 56. 2 EA Relocate Warning Post $200.00 $400.01] $500.00 $17000.00 $1,000.01] $250.00 $500.001 $500.00 57. 1 LS SWPPP $8~000.00i $8~000.0~ $2,900.00 $2,900.001 $2~900.01] $4,350.00 $4,350.ool $4~350.00 I [ I TOTAL BASE BID $532,725.50 I $6791902.451 $6911788.45 I $715,284.621 $718~284.62 I I I ADDITIVE BID I I $0.7o I 58. 1058 SF lnstall Ground Cover $0.451 $476.10 $740.60 $740.60 $1.15 [ $1~216.701 $1~216.70 59. LS Automatic Irrigation System $1,330.001 $1~330.00 $47~150.00 I $47~150.001 $47~150.00 $85,502.50 I $85~502.50[ $85~502.50 60. 1058 SF Soil Preparation/ Fine Grading $0.201 $211.60 $2.00 I $2,116.001 $2,116.00 $1.45 I $17534.101 $1,534.10 61. LS Maintenance Period $110.001 $110.00 $4,895.00 I $4,895.001 $4,895.00 $3,450.00 I $3,450.001 $3,450.00 62. 758 EA I Gallon Shrubs $6.5ol $4,927.00 $8.00 I $6,064.001 $6,064.00 $11.50 I $8,717.00[ $8,717.00 63. 13C EA 5 Gallon Shrubs $22.7_' $2,957.50 $21.00 $2~730.00[ $2,730.00 $28.75 I $3~737.501 $3~737.50 64. 65 EA 24" Box Trees $275.0( $17,875.00 $324.00 $21,06o.o01 $21~060.00 $345.00 I $22;425.001 $22~425.00 65. 131 CY BarkMulch $14.00[ $1~834.00 $34.00 $4~454.00 $4~454.00 $109.25 I $14~311.751 $14,311.75 I I ~ TOTAL ADDITIVE BID I $29~721.20 I $89,209.60 $89~209.60 $140~894.55 $140~894.55 I I ~ TOTAL BASE BID & ADDITIVE BID I $562~446.70 I $780~998.05 $856,179.171 $859~179.17 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 31, 2005 Pacilic Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase 2) Mega Way Enterprises Sequel Contractors, Inc. UNIT BID ]CORRECTED UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOlffNT [ AMOUNT COST AMOUNT I LS Clearing and Grubbing $45~000.001 $45~000.00[ $45~000.0( $10~000.00[ $10~000.0(3 2 261, SF Remove A.C. Pavement $1.501 $3,921.00 $3,921.0( $3.5ol $9,149.00 3 281 SF Remove P.C.C Pavement $3.ool $843.00 $843.0( $4.00 $1,124.0(~ 4 97 LF Remove P.C.C. Curb and Gutter $12.00 $17164.00 $1~164.0( $ 4.00 $1,358.01~ 5. 100 LF Remove P.C.C. Curb $9.00 $900.00 $900.0t $13.o01 $1~300.00 6. 70 SF Remove P.C.C. Drive Approach $10.00l $700.00[ $700.0I $5.00 $350.00 7. 631 SF Remove P.C.C. Sidewalk $2.50 $1~577.501 $1~577.5( $4.50 $2~839.50 8. 600 CY Unclassified Excavation $45.00 $27,000.00 $27~000.0£ $55.00 $33,000.00 9. 130 CY Unclassified Fill $30.00 $3~900.00 $3~900.0£ $110.001 $14~300.00 10. 166 LF Channel Excavation $100.001 $16~600.00! $16~600.0£ $25.001 $4,150.00 l 1. 70 LF Remove Stone Wall $45.001 $3~150.00 $3,150.0{: $65.00 $4~550.00 12. 4130 SF Remove Landscaping & Parking Area $2.50[ $10,325.00 $101325.0£ $3.00 $12~390.00 13. 232 LF Remove Rail $15.001 $3~480.001 $3,480.012 $40.001 $9~280.00 14. 3 EA Remove Post $50.001 $150.00 $150.0C $50.001 $150.00 15. 500 LF Saw cutting $2.001 $1~000.00 $1~000.0C $2.50 $1~250.00 16. 24 CY Crushed Aggregate Base $40.00[ $960.001 $960.01~ $250.00 $6~000.00 17. EA Surface Coating for Manholes $250.001 $500.00 $500.0C $300.001 $600.00 18. 8C TON Asphalt Concrete Pavement $100.00] $8~000.00 $8~000.0C $125.00 $10,000.00 19 422 LF Cold Plane (5' Wide) $5.251 $2,215.50 $2~215.5~ $ 0.00 $4,220.00 20. 1681' SF P.C.C. Pavement $5.50 $92~504.50 $92,504.51~ $4.00[ $67~276.00 21. 2 EA Adiust ManhoIe Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $5.00 $1,000.00 $10.00 $1~000.00 [ $2~000.00 22. 212 SF Decomposed Granite Trail $60.00] $12,720.001 $12~720.00 $200.00 $42~400.00 23. LS Y X 1' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10~000.00 $10~000.00 $10~000.00 24 1333 SF River Washed Granite Cobblestones $9.00 $1 ~997.00 $11~997.00 $9.00 $11~997.00 25 15 EA River Washed Granite Boulders $150.00 $2~250.001 $2,250.00 $200.00 I $3,000.00 26 10 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb $50.00 $500.00 $500.00 $20.00 I $~200.00 27 266 LF 8" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter $36.00 $9,576.00 $9,576.00 $20.00 I $5~320.00 28 38 SF 8" P.C.C. Drive Approach $12.00 $456.00 $456.00 $15.00 [ $570.00 29. 1984 SF ¢" P.C.C. Sidewalk $5.50 $10~912.00~ $10,912.00 $8.00 I $15~872.00 30. 789 SF P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramps $8.00 $6~312.001 $6~312.00 $8.50 $6~706.50 31. 3255 LF P.C.C. Concrete Header $8.00 $26~040.00 $26~040.00 $13.00 $42~315.00 32. 170 LF Relocate Existing Fence $45.00[ $7,650.00 $7,650.00 $25.00 $4t250.00 33. 560 LF Tubular SteeIFence $207.25] $116~060.001 $116~060.00 $65.00 I $36,400.00 Sheet 2A ] UNIT i BID CORRECTED UNIT '; NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST . AMOUNT ; AMOUNT COST i AMOUNT 34. LS 2" Water Service Connection Assembly 85,000.001 $5~000.001 $5~000.0( $8,000.00 [ $8,000.00 35. LS 3"Wa er Service Connection' Assemb V $6,o0o.ool $6,oo0.0oi 86,000.0I 810,000.00 I 810,000.00 36. LS traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Archibald Ave. 8140.000.001 $140~000.001 $140~000.0( $150,000.O0 I $150,000.00 37 LS I'raffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Amethyst Ave. $140,000.001 $140~000.00] $140,000.0( $70~000.00 I $70,000.00 38 2 EA Strict Identification Siens and Pilasters $2,500.00 $5,000.001 S5,000.0( $15~000~00 I $30~000.0~ 39 6915 SF lnstall Ground Cover $0.60 $4A49.001 $4,149.0( SI.00 I $6,915.00 40 I LS Automatic Irrigation System $75~000.001 $75~000.001 S75,000.0£ $150,000.00 I $150,000.00 41. 6915 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.801 $5,532.001 $5~532.0£ $0.60 I $4~149.00 42. I LS Maintenance Period $3,500.00[ $3~500.001 $37500.0C $17500.00 $17500.00 43. 145 EA I Gallon Shrubs $8.001 $1,160.001 $I,160.0C $18.00 $2~610.00 44. 175 EA 5 Gallon Shrubs $18.001 $3~150.001 $3,150.0C $25.00 I $47375.00 45. 17 EA 24" Box Tree $300.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.013 $450.00 I $7,650.00 46. 86 CY Bark Mulch $35.00 $3,010.00 $3,010.00 $40.00 I $3,440.00 47. 2 EA Install TemporaryPrqiect Construction S gns $150.001 $300.001 $300.00 $200.00 $400.00 48. I EA Install Permanent Interpretive Sign $250.013 $250.00[ $250.00 $300.00: $300.00 49. 2472 SF Remove Existing Markings and Stripings $1.013 $2,472.00 $2~472.00 $2.00 [ $4~944.00 50 170£ LF Traffic Striping $2.00 $3~400.00 $3,400.00 $1.00 I Sl,700.00 51. LS Traffic Control $1~000.001 $10~000.001 $1~000.00 $46,320.00 I $46?320.00 52. 12 EA Traffic Signs $100.00 $1~200.00 $1~200.00 $175.00 I $2,100.00 53. 6913 SF Pavement Markings $2.00 $1~380.00 $1,380.00 $2.00 I $1,380.00 54. 5 EA Removable Posts $200.001 $17000.00 $1~000.00 $600.00 $3,000.00 55. EA Relocate Sign $250.001 $250.00 $250.00 $200.00 $200.00 56. 2 EA Relocate Warning Post $250.00 $500.00] $500.00 $350.00 I $700.00 57. LS SWPPp $2,000.00 $2~000.001 $2,000.00 $5~000.00 I $5~000.001 I I I TOTAL BASE BID I $858,716.501 $848~726.50 I $889,000.0£ ADDITIVE BID [ [ I 58. 1058 SF install Ground Cover 1.51 $I,587.001 $1~587.0( $1.00 $I~058.013 59. I LS Automatic Irrigation System 65000 $65~000.001 $65~000.0( $10,000.00 I $10,000.013 60. 1058 SF Soil Preparation/Fine Grading .5 $1,587.00l $1~587.0( $0.60 I $634.80 61. I LS Maintenance Period 3500l $3,500.001 $3,500.0£ $600.00 $600.00 62. 758 EA I Gallon Shrubs 9[ $6,822.00 $6,822.0C $10.00 $7~580.00 63. 130 EA 5 Gallon Shrubs 3~ $2,860.00 $2,860.0£ $25.00 $3,250.00 64. 651 EA 24" Box Trees $22750.001 $221750.012 $400.00 $26,000.00 65. 131 CY Bark Mulch 601 $7~860.00 $7~860.0C $40.00 $5~240.00 TOTAL ADDITIVE BID $111~966.00 $111,966.00 $541362.80 ~' TOTAL BASE BID & ADDITIVE BID I $970,682.501 $960~692.50 [ $943,362.80 [ Sheet 2B J Phase: Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail