Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-119 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 00-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW-MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST, FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment 98-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the City. 6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-119 GPA 98-02 —AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8,2000, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land,which is approved for single-family residential. The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoria Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and is undeveloped. C. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"modifying the Circulation Element to extend Victoria Park Lane,and modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "B" to the proposed City Council resolution. d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 98-02 as shown in the attached City Council resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-119 GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. November 8, 2000 Page 3 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING CO MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arty T. M i I, Chairman ATTEST: Brad B creta I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW- MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY 232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST,FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND MAKING CHANGES TO THE CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment 98-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 7, 1999,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the application. 3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On September 22, 1999,the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold indefinitely. 5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the City. 6. On November 8,2000,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 7. On 2000,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 2 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, PartA, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land,generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north,Etiwanda Avenue to the east,future Church Street and Victoria Loop Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential, High Residential, and Village Commercial, and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor,and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoria Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and is undeveloped. C. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"modifying the Circulation Element to extend Victoria Park Lane,and modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit"B". d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,and 3 above,this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 98-02 subject to the condition set forth below. Planning Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for the Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PROPOSED LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS P RAIL SPRR LM LM INE L U LM D Z y L I MU Q = PARK LM MU (ESP) Q MU w ' K MU MU {O HURCH U MU O rY � FOOTH LL =' :......-..._..`. .::_. ::-::::-.: LEGEND H= High Residential . LM = Low-Medium Residential • M = Medium Residential .; MH = Medium-High Residential ,ww:•:::..•:••. MU = Mixed Use OS = Open Space RC = Regional Center RR = Regional Related Commercial ARROW •� VC = Village Commercial N Project boundary .*a:Village boundary GPA 98-02 VCPA 98-01 ESPA 98-01 EXHIBIT 'A! N _._._._._._._._._._._._._, Figure III- 3 f CIRCULATION PLAN PROPOSED ` R.O.W. ___—_—__--_ ' ' _ LOCATION R,% 4 COLLECTOR -------- ! SECORY MAJOR ART ...... o AJOR DIVIDED ,,,,,,,,,., c.-----. ..---= — — ARTERIAL % 41 EXISTING INTERCHANGE `""'"" '— — ' Sum ° O PROPOSED INTERCHANGE FREEWAY INTERCHANGE '\ a —�Iniil •_ewvy __ _—_ L FREEWAY TO FREEWAY,NO LOCAL ACCESS I I GRADE SEPARATION INTERSECTION FOR \ _ "" POSSIBLE WIDENING FI _. - - - +^--•--��-- ,»—« i-- SPECIAL BOULEVARD • ...Qa�w SPECIAL DESIGN SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE 9 11h f°ollnll r • - jh - GPA 98-02 VCPA 98-01 _- -_-_ -_ -_-_ ESPA 98-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Exhibit "B" 111-6 ._._.-------------._._._._._.------ ;_._. ,.------- --- ;r- -.--.- - , PARKS AND RECREATION PLAN - �• aT _____ ' • 1 l I ` �� 1 P 0 I F O g i ' PARKS --{'.;:;' PROPOSED PARKS EXISTING PARKS I : I` _ 1 FLOATING DESIGNATION •' Q I If___ _ _____ - 1�-� \\.QP • _ ` e.-... • / j i R ,*i • I '_' SCHOOLS* uw = O I EXISTING SCHOOLS �- - - - i , .i I _ 1 '; ___ __ ;'____ / •v" PROPOSED SCHOOLS -� ,•, _ ® - ;•, - - O SPECIAL USE FACILITY , •\❑E c i I Y= E �•-®.' 1_ E e , PARKS ARK•S RCP RANCHOca eauf ufCrtlo[Pw,wuoniowN•eoO•pur CENTRAL sa. lM.mRnK � _ u,n. CP-1 RED HAL COMPIRANY PARK n ci. �" ✓• • CP-2 NEIiRIDE COMMYIOTY NiRN E • I ® i I •I BEAR GI MRK tua, ij N ♦ , I N-2 EAST BERYL PERK B ' W �L Wit CHIMHS EFT MRK ®w\I 1 • , \\ , i N3 COYOTE CANYON PARK ,•,m. :I , I N! DROVES PARK MRMOSA MRK \ DONS PARK - M-S OLD TOWN PARK ' w•� `\ ' _ -- W10 SPRUCE AVENUE PARK \„ _��_� • J WH WESTOREENWAY MNK ______- Y_ - N-12 IENVOK IIARK MRK _ V 1 N 14 KENYOM ` ' 11-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA'GOCN60RMOOD CENTER •�/wy-_ $$F-��2 MONS MRK COMMLDOTY CENTER V•�CONFIYENCE MRN SII�����.CIITTYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA