HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-119 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 00-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP
FROM LOW-MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL;
COMMUNITY FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL;
OFFICE PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR
APPROXIMATELY 232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST,
FUTURE CHURCH STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH
AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE CIRCULATION AND PARK AND
RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18,
22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38;
227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40.
A. Recitals.
1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment
98-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject General
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution
99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application.
3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and
September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
4. On September 22, 1999, the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold
indefinitely.
5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the
City.
6. On November 8, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held
a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-119
GPA 98-02 —AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO.
November 8, 2000
Page 2
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 8,2000, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land, generally bounded by
Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, future Church Street and Victoria Loop
Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said
property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High
Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential,
High Residential, and Village Commercial and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping
center, and partially undeveloped land,which is approved for single-family residential. The property
to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor, and is
undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoria
Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office
Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under
construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and
is undeveloped.
C. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and
attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"modifying the Circulation Element to extend Victoria Park Lane,and
modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" to the proposed City Council resolution.
d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 98-02 as shown in the
attached City Council resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-119
GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO.
November 8, 2000
Page 3
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000.
PLANNING CO MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
arty T. M i I, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad B creta
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-02 CHANGING THE LAND USE MAP FROM LOW-
MEDIUM, MEDIUM, AND MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL; COMMUNITY
FACILITIES; REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL; OFFICE
PROFESSIONAL; AND PARK TO MIXED USE FOR APPROXIMATELY
232.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD
TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA AVENUE TO THE EAST,FUTURE CHURCH
STREET AND VICTORIA LOOP ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND DAY CREEK
CHANNEL TO THE WEST; AND MAKING CHANGES TO THE
CIRCULATION AND PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 227-201-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28 THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36;
227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND
25; AND 227-211-40.
A. Recitals.
1. American Beauty Development Co. filed an application for General Plan Amendment
98-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject General
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On July 7, 1999,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution
99-148, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the application.
3. On June 9, 1999, and continued at the request of the applicant to July 14, and
September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application.
4. On September 22, 1999,the applicant requested that his application be placed on hold
indefinitely.
5. On August 30, 2000, the applicant resubmitted essentially the same application to the
City.
6. On November 8,2000,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held
a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date.
7. On 2000,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly
noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date.
8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved by the Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO.
Page 2
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, PartA,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 8, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 291.8 acres of land,generally bounded by
Base Line Road to the north,Etiwanda Avenue to the east,future Church Street and Victoria Loop
Road to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west, and is presently undeveloped. Said
property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential, Medium Residential, Medium-High
Residential, Park, Regional Related Commercial/Office, Office Professional; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential,
High Residential, and Village Commercial, and is partially developed with a winery, a shopping
center, and partially undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential. The
property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utility Corridor,and is
undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential within the Victoria
Community Plan, Low-Medium Residential within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and Office
Professional within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and is partially undeveloped and partially under
construction for single-family houses. The property to the south is designated Regional Center and
is undeveloped.
C. The applicant proposes changing the subject site to Mixed Use as shown and
attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"modifying the Circulation Element to extend Victoria Park Lane,and
modifying the Park and Recreation Element to show a school and a park, as shown and attached
hereto as Exhibit"B".
d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element;
and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 98-02—AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO.
Page 3
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,and 3 above,this
Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 98-02 subject to the condition set forth below.
Planning Division
1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action
brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of
the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such
approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or
employees, for the Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its
agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a
result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at
its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this
condition.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted bythe
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 8th day of November 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
PROPOSED LAND USE FOR
VICTORIA ARBORS
P RAIL SPRR
LM LM
INE L
U LM D
Z
y
L I MU Q
= PARK LM
MU (ESP)
Q
MU w
' K MU MU
{O
HURCH
U
MU
O
rY �
FOOTH LL =' :......-..._..`. .::_. ::-::::-.: LEGEND
H= High Residential
. LM = Low-Medium Residential
• M = Medium Residential
.; MH = Medium-High Residential
,ww:•:::..•:••. MU = Mixed Use
OS = Open Space
RC = Regional Center
RR = Regional Related Commercial
ARROW •� VC = Village Commercial
N Project boundary
.*a:Village boundary
GPA 98-02
VCPA 98-01
ESPA 98-01
EXHIBIT 'A! N
_._._._._._._._._._._._._, Figure III- 3
f CIRCULATION PLAN
PROPOSED
` R.O.W.
___—_—__--_
' ' _ LOCATION
R,% 4 COLLECTOR --------
! SECORY
MAJOR ART
......
o AJOR DIVIDED ,,,,,,,,,.,
c.-----. ..---= — — ARTERIAL
% 41 EXISTING INTERCHANGE
`""'"" '— — ' Sum ° O PROPOSED INTERCHANGE
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
'\ a —�Iniil •_ewvy __ _—_ L FREEWAY TO FREEWAY,NO LOCAL ACCESS
I I GRADE SEPARATION
INTERSECTION FOR
\ _ "" POSSIBLE WIDENING
FI _. - - - +^--•--��-- ,»—« i-- SPECIAL BOULEVARD
• ...Qa�w SPECIAL DESIGN
SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE
9 11h
f°ollnll r • -
jh -
GPA
98-02
VCPA 98-01
_- -_-_ -_ -_-_ ESPA 98-01
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Exhibit "B"
111-6
._._.-------------._._._._._.------ ;_._. ,.------- --- ;r- -.--.- - , PARKS AND
RECREATION PLAN
- �• aT
_____ ' • 1 l I ` �� 1
P
0 I F O g i ' PARKS
--{'.;:;' PROPOSED PARKS
EXISTING PARKS
I : I` _ 1 FLOATING DESIGNATION
•' Q I If___ _ _____ -
1�-� \\.QP
• _
` e.-... • / j i R ,*i • I '_' SCHOOLS*
uw = O I EXISTING SCHOOLS
�- - - - i , .i I _ 1 '; ___ __ ;'____ / •v" PROPOSED SCHOOLS
-� ,•, _ ® - ;•, - - O SPECIAL USE FACILITY
,
•\❑E c
i I Y= E �•-®.' 1_ E e ,
PARKS
ARK•S RCP RANCHOca
eauf ufCrtlo[Pw,wuoniowN•eoO•pur CENTRAL
sa.
lM.mRnK
� _ u,n. CP-1 RED HAL COMPIRANY PARK n
ci.
�" ✓• • CP-2 NEIiRIDE COMMYIOTY NiRN
E • I ® i I •I BEAR GI MRK
tua, ij
N
♦ , I N-2 EAST BERYL PERK
B ' W �L
Wit CHIMHS EFT MRK
®w\I 1 • , \\ , i N3 COYOTE CANYON PARK
,•,m. :I , I N! DROVES PARK
MRMOSA MRK
\ DONS PARK
- M-S OLD TOWN PARK
' w•� `\ ' _ -- W10 SPRUCE AVENUE PARK
\„ _��_� • J WH WESTOREENWAY MNK
______- Y_ - N-12 IENVOK IIARK
MRK
_ V
1 N 14 KENYOM
` '
11-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA'GOCN60RMOOD CENTER
•�/wy-_ $$F-��2 MONS MRK COMMLDOTY CENTER
V•�CONFIYENCE MRN
SII�����.CIITTYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA