HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-109 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 00-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-03,A REQUEST TO AMEND
THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL
TO HIGH RESIDENTIAL (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITH A
SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 1.31 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF MALVERN AVENUE AND
SALINA STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 209-041-47.
A. Recitals.
1. The Southern California Housing Development Corporation filed an application for
Development District Amendment No.00-03,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as"the application."
2. On September 27, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the an associated application and issued Resolution
No. 00-108, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No.
00-02B be approved.
3. On September 27, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 27, 2000, including written and oral staff reports,together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 1.31 acres of land,basicallyan"L"shaped
configuration, located south of the intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street, which is
presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated General Commercial and
is developed with a parking lot for use by the City's Senior Center and beyond there is a
neighborhood shopping center. The properties to the west are designated General Commercial and
are developed with office structures. The property to the east,on the east side of Malvern Avenue,
is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the Rancho
Cucamonga Senior Center, and further east the land is developed with single family houses. The
property to the south is within the Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)designation and is
developed with the Cucamonga Elementary School; and;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-109
DDA 00-03—SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.
September 27, 2000
Page 2
C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development through the land use review process of this application; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element
by designating appropriate land use designations for senior housing on the subject site; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties as evidenced by the findings of the environmental analysis.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, satisfying the location requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District,and
compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its close proximity to a
senior recreation center; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions listed in the Initial
Study Parts I and II; and
C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and with
the Development Code bythe consideration of a Development Agreement which contains provisions
for the Senior Housing Overlay District designation.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the projectwill
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission;and,further,this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations,which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c)of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project,there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-109
DDA 00-03—SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.
September 27, 2000
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment No. 00-03 to
establish an High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) District and accompanying Senior
Housing Overlay District at the site described in this Resolution and shown in Exhibit "A" of this
Resolution.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2000.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ;
La T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST: 's
>1411ler, Sk4efary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted bythe
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of September 2000, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
M
x
o�
r«
D DDA 00-03 - Development Districts Map
L,r �
�r
,L
l{ }I.Jh{ mullh(amity housing
8 church
no
Arrow Hwy.
Senior Center Application site
:::2:2222222«::U
.£.•................... Development Districts
...... 0 LOW
.....
industrial ;;i;; AI ine St.
DDA W-03 „ „ 0 LOW MEDIUM
office park Changeto ;;
High Residential • 2; MEDIUM
(24-30 tlwelling units/acre) •. C
G
•••••••••_••�• :. :: MEDIUM HIGH
:2:::•:::.::�?? HIGH
................
•'•"••••••••••• Salena St. OFFICE PROFESSIONAL
...• ; GENERAL COMMERCIAL
................ .. .
'22.222222:::::
........................ ............
••••••• ® GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
..... ........
.•...;;..:;.,,,,,.,•�;�;,,,,. .,.,.yv��� single family > ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
U �,,s,5,:.•:�;s.•:t•.�;�.•.�,• '''�.'•%`�'.ti.', ' . neighborhood Q
Cucamonga `. O
.. �:
Elements School r� ...:.....:.:...:..........::
Elementary v� p::
:: ....... .
N
no scale