HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/08/03 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
AGENDAS
· Redevelopment Agency
· City Council
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays ~* 7:00 p.m.
A1UGISST 3, 2005
AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern
Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member
L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member
Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session ................... Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
~.~I~ANCHO
[~UC. AMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE CiTY COUNCIL
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all pemons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There
is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca,us
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact lhe City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
Cb~MONGA
IIn. CALL TO ORDERI
1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __,
Michael Spagnolo__, and Williams__.
II ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
[] D. CONSENT CALENDARI
The,following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: June 8, 2005 (Special Meeting)
July 6, 2005
July 18, 2005 (Special Meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register 7/13/05 through 7/26/05 and Payroll
ending 7/26/05, for the total amount of $4,787,369.88. 1
3. Approval of a contract extension with Coastal Building Services (CO 32
00-102) for a maximum of six months not to exceed $175,321, which
includes $20,000 for anticipated extra work related to construction, to
be funded from 1001312-5304 ($173,503) and 1700201-5304
($1,818).
4. Approval of a piggyback contract for the purchase of one new, 33
dedicated CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) Street Sweeper from Kelly
Equipment of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in the amount of
$228,083.05, to be funded from Acct. 1188313-5603 (Integrated
Waste Management) as approved in the FY 05/06 budget.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 2
cRANcHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE
UGA.MONGA
5. Approval to renew a Professional Services Agreement in an annual
amount not to exceed $80,000 for the period of July 1, 2005 through
June 30, 2006, to Hu/s Environmental, LLC, with an option to renew
for additional one year periods, upon review and confirmation of
pricing and mutual consent, to a total of three years, to be funded
from 118-3135300.
6. Approval of vendor selection and award a contract to /BM for the
pumhase of an IBM Production Series Server for the Integrated
Financial Accounting System (IFAS) application, and appropriate
funds in the amount not to exceed $65,000.00 from Acct. 1714001-
5605.
7. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $998,694.00 to the
apparent Iow bidder, Laird Construction Co.,/nc. (CO 05-074), for the
Base Bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10%
contingency in the amount of $99,869.40 for the FY 2005/06 Local
Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various Streets, to be
funded from CDBG funds, Acct. No. 1204-314-5650/1527204-0 and
Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1022176-0 and
appropriate an additional amount of $410,000.00 to Acct. No. 1176-
303-5650/1022176-0 from Measure "1" fund balance.
8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $445,545.00 to the lowest
responsible bidder, Laird Construction Co., /nc. (CO 05-075), and
authorized the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$44,554.50 for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street
to Arrow Route, to be funded from SB 325 funds, Acct. No. 1180-303-
5650/1472180-0, TEA-21 funds, Acct. No. 1208-303-5650/1472208-0,
and Measure 'T' funds, Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1472176-0, and
appropriate $490,099.50 (Contract award of $445,545.00 plus 10%
contingency in the amount of $44,554.50) to Acct. No. 1180-303-
5650/1472180-0 ($105,118.86) from SB 325 fund balance, Acct. No.
1208-303-5650/1472208-0 ($314,000.00) from TEA-21 fund balance,
and Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1472176-0 ($84,000.00) from Measure
'T' fund balance.
9. Approval and authorization of a sole source Professional Services
Agreement between All City Management Services (CO 05-076) and
the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide school crossing guard
services.
10. Approval of the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Upland
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CO 05-077) for Street
Improvements on Grove Avenue located within the City of Upland,
and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement and City Clerk to
attest thereto.
11. Approval to enter into an agreement with the San Bernardino County
Flood Control District (CO 05-078) to lease property at 12158 Base
Line Road to facilitate the operation of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's Hazardous Waste Program.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
~J~rCHO HALL, 10500 C~VtC CENTER DRIVE
CUCAMONGA
12. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with SD&O, Inc. (CO 70
05-079), in the amount of $65,000, and authorize the expenditure of a ,
10% contingency in the amount of $6,500 to provide Fiscal Year
2005/2006 Topographical Design Survey services for proposed capital
improvement projects at various locations within the City, to be funded
from various individual project accounts as approved in the FY
2005/2006 budget, and appropriate $10,000 to Acct. No. 1110-303-
5650/1533176-0 (Cucamonga Creek Bike Trail) from Beautification
fund balance.
13. Approve a contract extension with WSA Security, Inc. (CO 01-060) to
June 30, 2006, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001312-5304 72
($120,000), 1133303-5304 ($120,000), 1700201-5304 ($70,380), and
1290606-5300 ($22,000) to cover monthly service and extra work for
Fiscal Year 05-06.
14. Approval to accept the Victoria Arbors Park Improvement Project from
Standard PacificJictoria Arbors, LLC, as complete, authorize the 75
filing of a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept the Maintenance Bond, and record the Grand Deed for
the property.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-233 76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR VICTORIA ARBORS
PARK AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
15. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No.
PRF8699474 in the amount of $285,166.00 for the Carnelian Street 77
Storm Drain and Street Rehabilitation Improvements from Vivero
Street to 19~h Street, Contract No. 03-058.
II ~, CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 4
C~[~rcao HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONC~
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ]
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING 79
THE 2005/2010 MEASURE "l" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TVVENTY-YEAR
TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2005/06,
AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE 'T' FUNDS
RESOLUTION NO. 05-234 81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010
MEASURE "1" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY-
YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING
IN FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1" FUNDS
2. STATUS ON VICTORIA ARBORS PARK (Oral)
3~ CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS 87
REPEALING COUNCIL ACTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THE
ETIWANDA CREEK PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT, CASE NO. RVC 081807
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 5
C[[~NCHO HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMON~
RESOLUTION NO. 05-235 94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS RESOLUTIONS
NOS. 04-211 AND 04-212
ORDINANCE NO. 747 (first reading) 95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS ORDINANCE
NO. 728
L COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three
minutes per Councilmember.)
2. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral Report)
3. DISCUSSION OF TOWN HALL MEETING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
J. ADJOURNMENTI
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on July 28, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
June 8, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Special Meetinq
II ^. CALL TO ORDER I
A special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Planning Commission was held
on Wednesday, June 8, 2005, in the Training Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:04
p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Planning Commissioners: Rich Fletcher, Larry McNiel, Cris McPhail, Pamela Stewart and
Chairman Rich Macias.
Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Kevin Ennis, Planning Commission Attorney; Brad Buller,
City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, Mike Diaz, Senior Planner; Gall Sanchez, Planning
Commission Secretary; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
II B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
No communication was made from the public.
II c. ITEM(S)OFDISCUSSION I
Cl. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS OF MUTUAL INTEREST
Chairman Macias thanked the City Council for allowing this opportunity to meet. He respectfully asked
that the City Council do this twice per year so they know the pulse of what the City Council wants in order
for them to do a good job. He stated the success of the Commission is because of the support of the City
Council. He mentioned the Foothill Boulevard improvements, and felt it was a great contribution to the
City. He stated Central Park is a great addition to the City. He hoped they can continue to grow the
relationship. He felt they should discuss the demand of housing. He stated the Commission would like to
hear the City Council's comments.
Commissioner McNiel stated they appreciate the support of the City Council. He felt what has been done
by both the City Council and the Planning Commission is very good. He stated the only thing that bothers
him is that people go through the process and already have the votes on a project from the City Council.
He advised everyone to be cautious of the commitments made to people before it goes to a vote. He
felt we have a fine City. He did not feel we could stop building houses.
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes
June 8, 2005
Page 2
Commissioner Stewart felt there would be more design awards this year. She stated they are trying hard
to get streetscape for the one-story houses. She stated the developers feel the Planning Commission is
making it difficult for them because of this. She felt the mall is great, but felt Arbor Lane is very special.
She felt 4th Street is developing very nicely and was glad to see this because of everything going in there.
She stated Central Park is also a great place and has also heard that people want to get soccer fields
going. She agreed with Chairman Macias about meeting twice each year.
Commissioner McPhail stated she appreciates when there is an appeal, and the Council sends the
project back to the Planning Commission to work on the issue. She felt this was supporting them when
the City Council does this. She felt it was the Planning Commission's job to give their opinion to the City
Council. She hoped the City Council would let them know if they are not doing their job. She appreciated
the leadership of the City Council.
Commissioner Fletcher stated he concurs with everything that has been said. He felt Rancho
Cucamonga has finally arrived. He commented on all the facilities at Central Park. He felt everyone
should be proud to live in Rancho Cucamonga. He stated kids are walking on sidewalks, which is a little
thing that some cities don't have. He stated he did like the idea of joint meetings a couple times per year.
He felt there would be pressure in the future to change some of the zoning, and that we would need to
look at what we want to enhance, and what we want to protect. He mentioned affordability of single story
homes and homes for first time homebuyers. He felt we should be looking at having about 20% single
story homes. He felt the main thing is what we want to protect and what we want to enhance. He felt the
City is a great place and will only get better.
Mayor Alexander stated we will need to look at the affordable housing issue within the next few years. He
stated he knows the decisions of the Planning Commission are hard. He agreed the mall has got lots of
compliments and appreciates the hard work of everyone. He stated when there is an appeal he is not
aware people are coming to the City Council first prior to it going to the Planning Commission. He asked
when there is an appeal, is it appropriate to meet with two people of he Planning Commission first.
Kevin Ennis, Planning Commission Attorney, stated the decision of the City Council should be based on
the information presented to them. He stated if the Council does find out other information outside the
hearing, they should bring that information into the record so that all Councilmembers have the same
information. He stated he would talk to City Attorney Jim Markman to make sure he is comfortable with
this opinion.
Mayor Alexander felt this might allow the Council to get additional information.
Kevin Ennis, Planning Commission Attorney, felt it would be a good idea to get the City Council receiving
all the information at the same time, but that he would check into this.
Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that possibly the City Council might want to listen to the audiotape of
the Planning Commission meeting. He felt if the Council wants to talk to the Planning Commission they
might want meet in an open forum to do this.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed the City Council and Planning Commission should meet at a
minimum of every six months. He stated he talks to people out in the community and everybody wants a
Trader Joes and a Nordstrom. He wished they were here right now, but the City is trying to get them. He
hoped there would be more staff added with the new budget and felt they really need that. He stated his
big concern is that after a new project is completed, he gets complaints from people about the developer
because they are not living up to their promises. He wished the residents most affected or adjacent to a
project could give their approval of the project once it is almost completed. He mentioned the Carriage
Estates and that some of the landscaping is not there anymore. He felt staff should make sure all of the
conditions have been met. He stated he wanted to make sure there are no lingering concerns when a
project is close to being completed. He stated he hears people love the mall. He stated they mention the
traffic and circulation and felt these things need to be worked on. He stated he has heard that people
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2005
Page 3
want more things at Central Park like a tot lot, etc. He stated he would hope there will be no more
development above the second set of utility lines in the mountains. He wants to make sure there is open
space preserved. He stated he was not aware of any commitments made to a developer prior to it
coming to the City Council. He stated sometimes a developer will contact a Council person to get feed
back about their project, and stated he would try not to go over that process. He felt there should be 40%
rate of single story homes. He wished we could request there be larger lots.
Mayor Alexander stated there could be an ordinance drafted to accommodate this.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt the community will need a good inventory of single story homes. He asked
if there was a view ordinance.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is no such ordinance.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated his big concern is that there is public input about a project once it is near
completion.
Mayor Alexander stated he was not sure it would be a good idea for a committee of residents to do this
and was afraid of this.
Councilmember Williams felt a list of items could be noted and made part of the package for the
developer to follow these standards.
Brad Buller, City Planner, advised everyone about the process a developer goes through to get a project
approved. He stated the Planning staff does try to document all concerns by residents about the project.
Commissioner Stewart talked about a project that had five neighborhood meetings and all the information
the Planning Commission got from these meetings.
Commissioner McNiel stated there have been a couple areas in the City, ie., Dogpatch and Northtown
that needed improvements made, and that has been done.
Councilmember Williams felt there are some areas in the City that have been lost in the dust. She stated
improvements are needed around Baker and Grove and that this needs to be addressed. She stated she
does not feel like she did before that there are standards that are being traded. She felt the new homes
are just wonderful. She stated just yesterday she talked to Randall Lewis about single story homes. He
told about what they do with people to give them more house for the money by building two story. She
felt before an ordinance is approved for requiring more single story that the city look at the market. She
hoped the City will continue with planning landscaping that doesn't require much water. She stated traffic
is a huge issue. She felt we need to look at every available parcel and make a plan for it based on
everyone's knowledge and experience. She wanted us to get the very best. She did not feel the City
Council should be working with a developer to design a project prior to it coming before the Planning
Commission.
Councilmember Michael complimented the Planning Commission and staff, and felt they were working
very effectively. He stated it is not his intent to overturn a Planning Commission decision because he felt
this would make them ineffective. He agreed they should meet again in November. He felt the City
should stay with the General Plan and only make changes when necessary. He felt we should also
protect the commercial/industrial area. He agreed that a project should go through the Planning
Commission before the Council gives their input. He hoped we can continue with annexations and turn it
into City territory. He thanked the Commission for all they do.
Councilmember Spagnolo stated he agreed with a lot of what has been said. He stated communication is
very important. He stated he cannot take any credit for Central Park and the mall. He said it was the
people before him that should get the credit. He felt staff is great and are committed to the community.
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes
June 8, 2005
Page 4
He felt Rancho Cucamonga is unique. He felt we should follow the general plan. He felt the City is doing
a good job and that we learn from our mistakes. He stated the idea of developers coming to the Council
to get their plans through is not a good idea and that he is not in favor of that.
Commissioner McNiel stated when Central Park was designed it was supposed to be a passive park, not
full of soccer fields. He also informed the Council the Commission has not had a raise since 1985 and
felt they needed one.
Councilmember Williams agreed and felt this should be done during the next budget meeting.
Councilmember McNiel stated everything that has been built has gone through staff, and that they make
the Commission's job very easy.
Commissioner McPhail said the Planning Commission does very little, that it is the Planning staff that put
the projects together. She commended them for what they do.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt the Planning Commission should get a raise.
Councilmember Williams stated Central Park was always supposed to serve the people around it, but did
not feel a couple picnic tables would hurt it. She felt it would still be a passive park. She felt a tot lot is
very important to the some of the residents. She agreed this should not be full of soccer fields, but would
go along with the tennis complex.
Commissioner McPhail thanked Brad Bullet, City Planner, for keeping track of them.
Commissioner Fletcher stated it is a very difficult position for the Council when developers come to them
about projects. He stated Brad Buller, City Planner, has always been a good coach for him to keep him
out of any trouble. He felt all the staff is excellent. He did not feel economics should play a part in what
the Planning Commission approves as it relates to single story homes. He felt this would depend on the
aging of the community.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated he felt we have gone too far in home building to put an ordinance in
effect to say we should have 30 or 40 percent of single story homes.
Councilmember Williams felt we do need single story homes, but did not think it should have a number
placed on it. She stated she does support the push for single story.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, complimented the Planning Commission for their hard work because of their
commitment.
D. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk/Records Manager
Approved by Planning Commission: July 27, 2005
Approved by City Council: *
July 6, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meet nq
II ^. CALL T0 ORDER I
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 6, 2005, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Director; Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager; Sid Siphomsay, Information
Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Jon
Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Mike Diaz, Sr. Planner; Trang Huynh,
Building Official; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Alison Rowlen, Code Enforcement Officer;
Julie Lobios, Public Services Technician I; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer,
Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain
Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst II;
Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
II B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ]
No announcements/presentations were made.
[I c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [
C1. Jim Townsend, Rancho Cucamonga firefighter, stated they have not received a confirmation about
the three fire stations that need to be built. He stated they are waiting for the study to be completed and
fire response time information to be provided to him that he requested. He did not feel other city services
should be made a priority over emergency services. He stated their report is on their website.
C2. John Lyons, Etiwanda area, questioned why we have over built in the City, and stated he would like
to see a moratorium. He talked about Rancho Cucamonga being one of the fastest growing cities in the
nation. He talked about the settlement for the County and the Colonies project and how that relates to
Rancho Cucamonga. He felt we should be talking to the County about this to protect our City. He felt the
City should look into the loans the developers are using for their homes because he is hearing the loans
are going to have problems in the future. He felt the City should set up a crisis center to help people
when this happens.
C3. Lois Smith stated she wanted to speak about Valencia Commons and the fire they recently had at
that complex. She stated the fire started because a woman was smoking in bed. She thanked the Fire
Department for the great job they did to put the fire out.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 2
C4. Jeff Grover of the Fire Safe Council stated they are working on the Wild Fire Protection Plan and told
how it will help the City and surrounding areas. He stated they would be going out to the public soliciting
information about fire hazards there might be in the City. He stated the City needs to come up with this
plan so the it can get funding to reduce fire problems for the future. He hoped that in six months they will
have information to present to the City Council.
C5. Leslie Grimes mentioned the settlement with the Colonies project and the County. She did not think
the Colonies should get the property in question and hoped the City would so we have control over it.
She said she questions how the settlement talks have gone and if they were done correctly with
attorneys. She stated she is not in favor of the Colonies project.
[1 D. CONSENT CALENDAR [
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register 6/8/2005 through 6/29/05 and Payroll ending 6/29/05 for the total
amount of $6,684,864.07.
D2. Approval of the plans and specifications and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting
Bids" for the Etiwanda Avenue at Church Street Traffic Signal Improvements, located in Phase lB(a) of
Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from CFD 2001-01, Acct. No. 1612-303-
5650/1442612-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA AVENUE AT CHURCH
STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS" LOCATED IN PHASE
lB(a) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 IN SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D3. Approval of the plans and specifications and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting
Bids" for the Victoria Gardens Lane Median Island Rockscape Improvements from Day Creek Boulevard
to Church Street, located in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, to be funded from CFD
2003-01, Acct. No. 1614-303-5650/1442614-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA GARDENS LANE MEDIAN
ISLAND ROCKSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD TO CHURCH STREET" LOCATED IN PHASE 3A OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval of a Maintenance Agreement, as a sole-source, with IBM for hardware and software for
Fiscal Year 2005/2006 in the amount of $61,153.82 from Acct. No. 1001-209-5300.
D5. Approval for the purchase of one (1) graffiti removal vehicle from Dispensing Technology
Corporation in the amount of $100,673.60, to be funded from Acct. No. 1244-302-5604.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 3
D6. Approval to purchase Caltrans excess property located north of the 210 Freeway and south of
Highland Avenue between Archibald Avenue and 750 feet east of Archibald Avenue, as shown on
Caltrans R/W Map. No. 437511-15, to be funded from Acct. No. 1120-305~5650/1335120-0, and approval
of an appropriation of $107,260 to Acct. No. 1120-305-5650/1335120-0 from Park Development (Fund
120) fund balance.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY AGREES
TO ACCEPT PARCEL NO. DD007627-01-01 LOCATED NORTH OF
THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 750 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE
D7. Approve a reimbursement of $523,674.50 from CFD 2003-01 fund balance, Acct. No. 1614-303-
5650/1442614-0, to Forest City Commercial Development, and appropriate $523,674.50 to Acct. No.
1614-303-5650/1442614-0 from CFD 2003-01 (Fund 614) fund balance.
D8. Approval of a Maintenance Agreement, as a sole-source, with Active Network Class Program &
Facility Management Software for FY 05/06 in the amount of $26,163.72 from Acct. No. 1001-209-5300.
D9. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street
Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16090, located at the northwest corner of Milliken
Avenue and 7th Street, submitted by Fairway Business Centre, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16090
RESOLUTION NO. 05-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16090
D10. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $341,601.65 to the apparent Iow bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc. (CO 05-068) for the
Base Bid and Additive Bid Alternates Map G, Map H, and Map I of their proposal, and authorize the
expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $34,160.17 for the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - Slurry of Various Streets, to be funded from Gas Tax funds, Acct. No. 1170-303-
5650/1022170-0 and Measure "l" funds, Acct. No. 1176-303-5650/1022176-0.
D11. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Austin Foust Associates, Inc. (CO 05-069) to
provide a Traffic Circulation Study for the reopening of 19th Street/Highland Avenue between Haven
Avenue and Milliken Avenue in the amount of $27,420 and authorization of 10% contingency, to be
funded from Acct. No. 1124~303-5650/1361124-0. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 4
D12. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $1,620,500.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company (CO 05-070) for
the Base Bid and Additive Bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in
the amount of $162,050.00, for the Phase 01/03 Final Work of CFD's 2001-01 and 2003-01 for Final
Street Overlay, Final Striping, Median Island Construction and Landscaping, Traffic Signal Modification,
etc., on Foothill Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to 1-15 Freeway, to be funded from CFD 2003-01
funds, Acct. No. 1614-303-5650/1442614-0 and appropriate $1,797,550.00 (Contract award of
$1,620,500.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $162,050.00 plus construction soils and materials
testing in the amount of $15,000.00) to Acct. No. 1614-303-5650/1442614-0 from CFD 2003-01 fund
balance.
D13. Approval to appropriate $96,960 to Fund 176 (Measure "1" - Acct. No. 1176-305-5650/1020176)
and approval for award and execution of Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $88,140.00 to
VanderHawk Consulting, LLC (CO 05-071), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $8,814.00 for the update of the City's Pavement Management Program, to be funded from
Fund 176 - Measure "1", Acct. No. 1176-305-5650/1020176.
D14. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with Associated
Engineers, Inc. (CO 04-094), Dan Guerra & Associates (04-095), Dawson Surveying, Inc. (04-096) and
SB&O, Inc. (04-097), for annual construction survey services for proposed capital improvement projects
for FY 2005/2006, and approval of amendment to such contracts to include an updated and revised fee
schedule (Exhibit "C") reflecting reasonable, annual cost-of-living increases, to be funded from various
individual project accounts as approve in the FY 2005/2006 budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF
AGREEMENTS WITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC., DAN
GUERRA & ASSOCIATES, DAWSON SURVEYING, INC., AND SB&O,
INC., FOR ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION SURVEY SERVICES FOR
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR FY
2005/2006, AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO SUCH
CONTRACTS TO INCLUDE AN UPDATED AND REVISED FEE
SCHEDULE (EXHIBIT "C") REFLECTING REASONABLE, ANNUAL
COST-OF-LIVING EXPENSES
D15. Approval of a Resolution renewing the Professional Services Agreements with Krazan &
Associates, Inc. (04-098), Ninyo & Moore (04-099), and RMA Group (04-100), for annual soils and
materials testing services for proposed capital improvement projects for FY 2005/2006, and approval of
amendments to such contracts to include an updated and revised fee schedule (Exhibit "C") reflecting
reasonable, annual cost-of-living increases, to be funded from various individual project accounts as
approved in the FY 20052006 budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF
AGREEMENTS WITH KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., NINYO &
MOORE, AND RMA GROUP FOR ANNUAL SOILS AND MATERIALS
TESTING SERVICES FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS FOR FY 2005/2006, AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS
TO SUCH CONTRACTS TO INCLUDE AN UPDATED AND REVISED
FEE SCHEDULE (EXHIBIT "C") REFLECTING REASONABLE,
ANNUAL COST-OF-LIVING EXPENSES
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 5
D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for ~hUblic storm drain improvements for PM 16167,
located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 9 Street, submitted by ON Vineyard, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
PUBLIC STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR PM 16167
D17. Approval to accept Improvements, retain a portion of the Labor and Material cash deposit
($11,750.00) in the amount of $2,350.00 for the required maintenance security, and file a Notice of
Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00650, located on the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Malachite Avenue, submitted by James & Maria Kypreos.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00650 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D18. Approval to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Improvements for
PM 15692, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Ms.
Patricia Prutting.
D19. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15783, located on the west side of
Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & D Construction.
D20. Approval to accept the Landscape Public Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for only the
Landscape Improvements for Parcel Map 16033, generally located east and west of Day Creek
Boulevard south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by O & S Holdings, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16033 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16253, located at Victoria Street, west
of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Crestwood Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-21§
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16253 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D22. Approval to accept the 6th Street Storm Drain, Railroad Crossing Improvements and Pavement
Rehabilitation from Archibald Avenue to 380' west of Hermosa Avenue, Contract No. 04~080 as complete,
release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final contract amount of $631,249.49.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 05-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TM STREET STORM
DRAIN, RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO 380' WEST OF
HERMOSA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 04-080 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NQTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D23. Approval to accept the Devon Street Storm Drain from Archibald Avenue to Malven Avenue,
Contract No. 04-181 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release
the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve
the final contract amount of $417,041.68.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE DEVON STREET
STORM DRAIN FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO MALVEN AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 04-181 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D24. Approval to accept the Banyan Community Trail from Sapphire Street to the west City limit,
Contract No. 05-008 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release
the labor and Material Bond, and authorize the city Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve
the final contract amount of $110,630.50.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BANYAN
COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM SAPPHIRE STREET TO THE WEST CITY
LIMIT, CONTRACT NO. 05-008 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Motion: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item Dll. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM Dll. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Austin Foust
Associates, Inc. (CO 05-069) to provide a Traffic Circulation Study for the reopening of 19th
Street/Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue in the amount of $27,420 and
authorization of 10% contingency, to be funded from Acct. No. 1124-303-5650/1361124-0.
Councilmember Williams stated she wanted to make sure the study will include the opportunity to give
input into the study so that it is part of the completed document.
Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated the Council would have that opportunity.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked what the study will determine.
Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated it is to determine if it is a significant street and if it should remain
open.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked what will happen when there are about 200 people asking to keep the
street open.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 7
Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated the study is to collect information and provide it to the City Council
so they can make a finding if it is a significant street or not. He stated this is the first step in this process.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve item Dll. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
E. CO SE T O I CES [
El. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) PURSUANT
TO AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 744.
ORDINANCE NO. 744 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 643 AND
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) PURSUANT
TO AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF
APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
744. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEMS F1 AND F2 WERE DISCUSSED AT ONE TIME.
Fl. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-00106
RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the land use designation
from General Commercial to Park for 3.36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrene Avenue,
between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use designation from General
Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwe ng units per acre) for 5 54 acres of land, located
on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Aven~e - APN: 0207-262-18
(portion of) and 27. Related files: Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220.
Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
F2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005
00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the zoning
designation from General Commercial to park for 3.36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone
Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use designation from
General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwe ng un ts per acre) for 5 54 acres of land,
lO · u, . ·
cared on the north s~de of 9 Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue - APN: 0207-262-
18 (portion of) and 27. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005~00220. Staff
has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
A staff report was presented by Mike Diaz, Sr. Planner.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 8
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
MQTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve Resolution No. 05-222. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-222
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2005-00106, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR
3.36 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE
AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD
DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-
14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.54 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY
600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262~18 (PORTION OF) AND 27
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 745.
ORDINANCE NO. 745 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE
ZONING DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK
FOR 3.36 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND
RICHWOOD DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
5.54 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TM
STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262-
18 (PORTION OF) AND 27
MOTION: Moved by Michael seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 745 for the July 20, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 9
II ~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I
H1. REPORT ON THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER {EOC) OPENING, JUNE 1,2005 (Oral)
A staff report and power point presentation were given by Fire Chief Peter Bryan (which is on file in the
City Clerk's office).
ACTION: Report received and filed
H2. PRESENTATION ON NEIGHBORHOOD CLEAN-UP DAY (Oral)
A staff report and power point presentation were given by Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor
and Alison Rowlen, Code Enforcement Officer, (which is on file in the City Clerk's office).
Councilmember Michael thanked Code Enforcement for the great job they do.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.)
Councilmember Michael hoped everyone had an opportunity to see the fireworks at the Epicenter on 4th
of July. He stated it was a fine program. He commented on the General Plan Amendments approved on
Madrone Avenue near Cask and Cleaver, and felt this was going to be a real amenity for this area.
Councilmember Williams stated she was at Code Enforcement's clean up day and what a great event it
was. She stated late last night the Governor announced there is an agreement on the budget with the
first vote to occur tomorrow morning. She stated it was announced there would be early repayment of the
Vehicle License Fees to the cities. She stated Rancho Cucamonga would hopefully get back $4.2 million.
She stated there is $6.8 million to go to back to San Bernardino County to repair streets and roads, of
which Rancho Cucamonga will get some of this money for our streets. She stated the City is in support of
the agreement. She felt it has taken courage for the Governor to do some of the things he has done, and
that she is impressed with his actions. She stated there would be no new taxes and no new borrowing in
this Agreement.
Rex stated the 4th of July event was a great event. He stated he would like to get a report on the police
and fire department's efforts for that evening. He commented on the streetlights and added they need to
get fixed. He stated there are many areas on the freeway that have dead landscaping and felt it was a
fire hazard. He stated he has talked to some residents and they would like more street sweeping. He
talked about an accident on Rochester and Base Line and the people trying to help with this. He felt
people in the City really care about each other.
12. CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO
APPOINT NEW MEMBERS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
A staff report was presented by Deborah Clark, Library Director.
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the appointment of Dobbin Lo, Sharon
Nagel and Robert Coberly to the Library Board of Trustees. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 10
13. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO INSTALL A SIGN AT CENTRAL PARK REGARDING THF
FREEDOM'S FLAME SCULPTURF
A staff report was presented by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were:
Dennis Stout stated this project has been worked on for over four years. He stated the
Resolution first approved by the City Council does not indicate where the Freedom's Flame
should be placed. He stated they are requesting that Central Park be the place for the Freedom's
Flame. He stated in order to avoid sales tax issues with this monument, it should belong to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. He stated he would like to get this process started to find a location
within Central Park for this. He stated they are currently raising money for this project, but that a
lot of the donors are asking where it will be placed. He stated they have raised hundreds of
thousands of dollars, but that this will cost millions.
Councilmember Spagnolo felt the City should make the commitment to the land at Central Park for this
monument, and to approve the sign to go up to show support for this. He did not feel the City should turn
its back on this type of project because of the impact 911 has had on this Country. He stated the items
we have from this tragic event are very important and that the City should make a commitment to use a
piece of land at Central Park and also allow the sign to go up with information about this project.
Mayor Alexander commented when the fire truck that was brought up to Chaffey College from the 911
disaster.
Kevin ??? (did not give last name) stated he had the privilege of bringing the fire truck back to Rancho
Cucamonga. He stated this is America's memorial. He stated he was given photos from the Pentagon
that no one else has and how important this is. He stated this is his passion to see this memorial built.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to commit to designating this to Central Park and
place the appropriate signage.
Councilmember Williams stated she is concerned because she feels this is putting the cart before the
horse. She stated when the decisions are made for phase II of Central Park then consideration can be
given to putting the sign up. She felt there should be more discussion as to what phase II of Central Park
would include. She stated she is concerned about making a decision tonight.
Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is for the project. He felt this was too premature at this time. He felt
like he was being put on the spot to gauge his loyalty or patriotism. He stated he just has concerns.
Councilmember Michael felt they should first work with staff to find the best place for this and then come
back to the City Council with their conceptual plan.
Dennis Stout felt Councilmember Michael's comments were very good. He stated he would be
more than willing to work with staff to come up with a conceptual presentation to come back to
the City Council. He felt it might not hurt to have conversations with the Water District as well.
Mayor Alexander stated he would like to change the wording to "conceptually commit to", as opposed to
"commit to." He stated he would like to leave the motion as is with this change in wording. He repeated
the motion as "to conceptually commit to designating the area for Freedom's Flame art feature and
placing appropriate signage at Central Park."
Motion Fail 2-3 (Gutierrez, Michael and Williams voted no).
City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 11
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to direct the Freedom's Flame Foundation to work
with Community Services Staff, or any other staff designated by the City Manager, to develop some
conceptual plans of site location at Central Park and the feasibility of locating that conceptually, and to be
brought back to the Council in the form of a Resolution committing this.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
July 18, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetinq
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, July 18, 2005, in the
Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager and Dr. Bill Mathis, Facilitator
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM
Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item.
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM
No communication was made from the public.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CITY MANAGER PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54957..
The meeting adjourned at 4:00 p.m. with the City Council concurring that discussions would continue at a
future meeting - date to be determined.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
Approved: * City Clerk/Records Manager
~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~ Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP-00225087 7/13/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 143.74
AP- 00225087 7/13/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 131.99
AP - 00225088 7/13/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 34.83
AP- 00225088 7/13/2005 ACTION AWARDS 1NC. 34.83
AP- 00225088 7/13/2005 ACTION AWARDS INC. 23.22
AP- 00225089 7/13/2005 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00
AP- 00225090 7/13/2005 AGA 100.00
AP-00225092 7/13/2005 ALPERTPRINTING 2,165.83
AP - 00225094 7/13/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 586.52
AP 00225094 7/13/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. 1NC. 175.51
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 504.52
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 60.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 19.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROW~-IEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225097 7/13/2005 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 550.00
AP 00225098 7/13/2005 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 27,884.50
AP 00225098 7/13/2005 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 19,871.00
AP 00225099 7/13/2005 ASSOCIATED GROUP 155.00
AP 00225100 7/13/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,113.93
AP 00225100 7/13/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 67.08
AP 00225100 7/13/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 990.00
AP 00225101 7/13/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,148.02
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC 144,462.59
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC -37,200.00
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC -61,712.80
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC -375.00
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BAR_NHARTINC -14,446.26
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC 3,750.00
AP 00225102 7/13/2005 BARNHARTINC -26,671.25
AP 00225103 7/13/2005 BILLIARDS AND BARSTOOLS 24,325.32
AP 00225103 7/13/2005 BILLIARDS AND BARSTOOLS 92.99
AP-00225104 7/13/2005 BOCTOR, ALFRED 70.00
AP - 00225105 7/13/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 231.92
AP-00225106 7/13/2005 CALSENSE 6,400.29
AP-00225107 7/13/2005 CAMERON WELDING 36.42
AP- 00225108 7/13/2005 CARTE GRAPH SYSTEMS 17,438.78
AP - 00225109 7/13/2005 CENTRAL RESTAURANT PRODUCTS 18.75
AP - 00225110 7/13/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 3,501.87
AP - 00225110 7/13/2005 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 307.08
AP - 00225112 7/13/2005 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 39.99
AP - 00225113 7/13/2005 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 2,447.01
AP - 00225113 7/13/2005 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 29.99
AP - 00225114 7/13/2005 CITY RENTALS 108.90
AP - 00225115 7/13/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 2,315.00
AP - 00225115 7/13/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 708.75
AP- 00225115 7/13/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 12,920.00
AP- 00225115 7/13/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 3,205.00
AP- 00225116 7/13/2005 CLARK, CRYSTAL 250.00
AP - 00225117 7/13/2005 CLARKE MASONRY 20.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~' 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check l~lo. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225118 7/13/2005 CLOUT 20.00
AP - 00225118 7/13/2005 CLOUT 20.00
AP - 00225118 7/13/2005 CLOUT 20.00
AP - 00225118 7/13/2005 CLOUT 20.00
AP - 00225118 7/13/2005 CLOUT 20.00
AP - 00225119 7/13/2005 CMS INC 8,285.98
AP- 00225121 7/13/2005 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 589.00
AP-00225123 7/13/2005 COX, JACQUIE 6.07
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,203.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 687.08
AP- 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 355.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 183.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 682.63
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.08
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 328.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 586.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,995.03
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103.88
AP- 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,519.41
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 187.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 319.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 706.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 631.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.08
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.08
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.78
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 357.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41.78
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 227.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 68.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 460.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 464.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.68
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.08
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 907.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.68
AP- 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 18.40
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,274.96
AP- 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.28
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.88
AP- 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.49
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,418.48
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~,~ 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTIL[CT 12,246.25
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 737.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 605.48
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,486.88
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,203.55
AP - 00225125 7/13/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 324.08
AP- 00225127 7/13/2005 D 7 CONSULTING INC 300.00
AP- 00225128 7/13/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 33,475.00
AP- 00225129 7/13/2005 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 215.00
AP- 00225131 7/13/2005 DON LA FORCE ASSOCIATES 171.10
AP - 00225132 7/13/2005 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 84.69
AP- 00225133 7/13/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 218.29
AP - 00225133 7/13/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 3,969.53
AP- 00225133 7/13/2005 EWINGIRRIGATION PRODUCTS 15.53
AP - 00225133 7/13/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 222.70
AP - 00225133 7/13/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 298.48
AP 00225134 7/13/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.44
AP 00225134 7/13/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.53
AP 00225134 7/13/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 17.44
AP 00225135 7/13/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00
AP 00225135 7/13/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 667.25
AP 00225135 7/13/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00
AP 00225135 7/13/2005 F1NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00
AP 00225135 7/13/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 603.50
AP 00225136 7/13/2005 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 75.42
AP 00225137 7/13/2005 FLUORESCOLIGHTING 1,450.00
AP 00225138 7/13/2005 FOUNTAINOLENPROPERTIES LLC 7,953.12
AP 00225139 7/13/2005 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,940.00
AP 00225140 7/13/2005 GAILMATERIALS 880.00
AP 00225140 7/13/2005 GAILMATERIALS 495.65
AP 00225140 7/13/2005 GAILMATERIALS 111.30
AP 00225141 7/13/2005 GARCIA, VIVIAN 10.12
AP - 00225143 7/13/2005 GIBBYS FENCING MATERIALS 700.00
AP - 00225144 7/13/2005 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPANY 27,101.34
AP - 00225144 7/13/2005 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPANY 18,725.94
AP - 00225144 7/13/2005 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPANY 30,763.08
AP - 00225144 7/13/2005 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPANY 8,845.20
AP- 00225145 7/13/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 105.25
AP- 00225145 7/13/2005 GOLF VENTURES WEST 3.62
AP - 00225146 7/13/2005 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00
AP - 00225147 7/13/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 100.00
AP - 00225147 7/13/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 789.46
AP - 00225147 7/13/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 24.51
AP- 00225148 7/13/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 415.00
AP - 00225148 7/13/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 113.70
AP - 00225149 7/13/2005 HALEY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 9.27
AP - 00225150 7/13/2005 HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS 164.32
AP-00225151 7/13/2005 HILL'S TOWING 55.00
AP - 00225152 7/13/2005 HOLIDAY PRINTING 4,837.94
AP- 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 248.04
AP - 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 44.37
AP - 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 710.67
AP- 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 7.65
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlrait Layout Time: ~,,~ 15:46:0
, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,~ Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 134.47
AP - 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES -7.80
AP 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 19.79
AP 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES -85.31
AP 00225153 7/13/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 67.15
AP 00225154 7/13/2005 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 837.86
AP 00225155 7/13/2005 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES INC 211.46
AP 00225156 7/13/2005 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARD1NO VALI 700.00
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 245.34
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 19.20
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 71.09
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 505.08
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC 118.61
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 468.71
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC 8.69
AP 00225157 7/13/2005 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTS [NC 135.89
AP 00225158 7/13/2005 ICI DULUXPA1NT CENTERS 1,102.84
AP 00225159 7/13/2005 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 103.03
AP 00225160 7/13/2005 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 795.00
AP 00225161 7/13/2005 ]NTOXIMETERS]NC 226.81
AP 00225162 7/13/2005 JDCINC 5,314.00
AP 00225163 7/13/2005 KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES ]NC 2,500.00
AP 00225164 7/13/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS ]NC 352.15
AP 00225164 7/13/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS [NC 1,170.03
AP 00225164 7/13/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS ]NC 0.05
AP 00225165 7/13/2005 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 103.99
AP - 00225166 7/13/2005 KEN ROGERS JR 500.00
AP - 00225167 7/13/2005 KIBRITJIAN, TOROS 70.00
AP - 00225168 7/13/2005 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES INC 1,980.00
AP-00225170 7/13/2005 LAMBARD INC 3,288.60
AP- 00225170 7/13/2005 LAMBARD ]NC -328.86
AP - 00225171 7/13/2005 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 1,500.00
AP - 00225172 7/13/2005 LASTING IMPRESSIONS PRINTING CO 892.45
AP - 00225173 7/13/2005 LAWSON PRODUCTS [NC 93.75
AP - 00225173 7/13/2005 LAWSON PRODUCTS [NC 72.27
AP- 00225174 7/13/2005 LDC COUGAR 7,953.12
AP - 00225175 7/13/2005 LIFEGUARD STORE ]NC, THE 132.75
AP-00225176 7/13/2005 LILSTITCH 301.70
AP-00225176 7/13/2005 LILSTITCH 529.05
AP- 00225176 7/13/2005 LIL STITCH 46.33
AP- 00225177 7/13/2005 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 350.00
AP- 00225178 7/13/2005 LOPEZ, ROBERT 131.00
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 306.43
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 3,513.26
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 15,786.26
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 5,029.69
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,454.75
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 766.73
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIFOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 1,040.66
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MAKIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,661.42
AP- 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 517.36
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTLrRAL ENT [NC 1,379.81
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 318.20
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 55.09
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~, I 15:46:0
~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,, Agenda Check ReRister
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225179 7/13/2005 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,005.49
AP- 00225180 7/13/2005 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES 1,800.00
AP- 00225181 7/13/2005 MCKINNEY, MICHAEL 250.00
AP- 00225182 7/13/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 56.97
AP- 00225182 7/13/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 87.96
AP- 00225182 7/13/2005 MIDWEST TAPE 68.97
AP - 00225184 7/13/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 387.63
AP - 00225184 7/13/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 25.00
AP - 00225184 7/13/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 130.20
AP - 00225184 7/13/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 2.97
AP - 00225184 7/13/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 28.17
AP - 00225185 7/13/2005 MR TS 24HR TOWING 125.00
AP - 00225186 7/13/2005 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL 248.25
AP- 00225187 7/13/2005 NATIONS RENT 116.90
AP 00225188 7/13/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 160.00
AP 00225188 7/13/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 250.00
AP 00225188 7/13/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS [NC 160.00
AP 00225188 7/13/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 36.85
AP 00225188 7/13/2005 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 860.00
AP 00225189 7/13/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS ' 46.39
AP 00225189 7/13/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.39
AP 00225189 7/13/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.39
AP 00225189 7/13/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 53.14
AP 00225190 7/13/2005 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 702.00
AP 00225191 7/13/2005 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 203.00
AP 00225192 7/13/2005 NOLO PRESS 47.71
AP 00225193 7/13/2005 OAKMONTINDUSTRIALGROUPLLC 100.00
AP 00225194 7/13/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFC 83.94
AP 00225194 7/13/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 47.50
AP 00225194 7/13/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 132.94
AP 00225194 7/13/2005 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF(3 83.94
AP 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 8.74
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 629.34
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 47.69
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 23.02
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 47.65
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 3.95
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 224.93
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 577.00
· AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 130.58
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 347.30
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 20.45
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 45.58
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 163.66
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -47.29
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 92.50
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 518.59
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 7.35
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 99.43
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 267.22
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -131.56
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 131.56
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -131.56
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 273.66
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.'~e 15:46:0
~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
: Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 thxough 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -189.64
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 215.28
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -131.56
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1,073.19
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 86.62
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 208.22
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 351.07
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 143.84
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -1,066.29
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 6.95
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 25.54
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 136.92
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5.86
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 176.81
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 9.86
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 96.51
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 291.98
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 18.53
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 37.31
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 188.22
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 37.86
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 364.67
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 49.28
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 12.56
AP - 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 18.12
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 296.55
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 158.63
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -108.72
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 14.98
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 24.77
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 3.86
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -3.86
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -626.09
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 370.57
AP - 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 190.83
AP - 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 106.14
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 139.78
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 23.68
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 601.16
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 841.86
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 18.90
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 24.31
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 517.02
AP - 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 21.92
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 130.00
AP - 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 118.69
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 990.44
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -77.60
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 79.40
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 4.57
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 66.92
AP- 00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 587.19
AP-00225197 7/13/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 6,933.07
AP-00225198 7/13/2005 OTANEZ, CAROLA 76.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_KEG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ] 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00225199 7/13/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 6.14
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 127.50
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 43.10
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 170.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 170.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 454.97
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 45.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 255.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 490.26
AP 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 517.20
AP- 00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP-00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 127.50
AP-00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 253.21
AP-00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 239.89
AP-00225201 7/13/2005 PEACOCK SYSTEMS 85.00
AP- 00225202 7/13/2005 PEP BOYS 230.46
AP- 00225202 7/13/2005 PEP BOYS 23.82
AP-00225202 7/13/2005 PEPBOYS -160.12
AP-00225202 7/13/2005 PEPBOYS 22.85
AP - 00225205 7/13/2005 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 150.00
AP- 00225206 7/13/2005 PITNEY BOWES 266.52
AP - 00225207 7/13/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,618.05
AP- 00225207 7/13/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,413.07
AP - 00225208 7/13/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00225208 7/13/2005 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP- 00225209 7/13/2005 PSOMAS 600.00
AP-00225210 7/13/2005 QWEST 2.09
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE 1,233.25
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE 127.28
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 427.17
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 519.98
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 44.89
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND RAUTOMOTIVE 29.38
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 38.76
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE 627.92
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 41.92
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 33.21
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 321.25
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 32.89
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE 138.32
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 298.55
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 605.56
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 41.92
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 58.97
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 56.92
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda.Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ,,,..,~, 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 865.12
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 330.47
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 717.41
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND RAUTOMOTIVE 307.59
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 400.77
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE 28.95
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 313.86
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 55.00
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 44.89
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 1,615.18
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 213.63
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE 341.96
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 514.07
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 409.74
AP- 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND RAUTOMOTIVE 35.80
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 42.89
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 324.25
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 332.43
AP - 00225212 7/13/2005 RAND R AUTOMOTIVE 40.99
AP 00225212 7/13/2005 RANDRAUTOMOT1VE 31.92
AP 00225213 7/13/2005 RADULESCU, ELIADE 140.00
AP 00225214 7/13/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 15.00
AP 00225214 7/13/2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 15.00
AP 00225215 7/13/2005 REDWING SHOESTORE 119.06
AP 00225218 7/13/2005 RIVERSIDEBLUEPR1NT 421.84
AP 00225218 7/13/2005 RIVERSIDEBLUEPR1NT 328.51
AP 00225221 7/I3/2005 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600.00
AP 00225222 7/13/2005 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 14,446.26
AP 00225222 7/13/2005 SAN DIEGO NATIONAL BANK 375.00
AP - 00225223 7/13/2005 SANTOS, MANNY 70.00
AP - 00225224 7/13/2005 SAXE-CLIFFORD, SUSAN 350.00
AP - 00225226 7/13/2005 SHOETERIA 116.36
AP - 00225227 7/13/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 763.00
AP- 00225227 7/13/2005 SIMPLOTPARTNERS 800.00
AP - 00225227 7/13/2005 S1MPLOT PARTNERS 493.78
AP- 00225227 7/13/2005 SIMPLOTPARTNERS 1,139.24
AP - 00225227 7/13/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,000.45
AP - 00225227 7/13/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 872.22
AP - 00225228 7/13/2005 SMART AND F1NAL 88.36
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,777.52
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41,110.35
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CAL1FORNIAEDISON 587.36
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,909.46
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.94
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.19
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.97
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.29
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.88
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:g 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.80
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.15
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.61
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.82
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.69
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.46
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.91
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.10
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALlleORNIA EDISON 14.57
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,812.97
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.08
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.12
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.92
AP 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.68
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.61
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t 19.05
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.74
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.19
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.96
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.27
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.17
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.74
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.56
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.64
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERIq CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,287.50
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.79
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.12
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.60
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.43
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.99
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.10
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.49
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHER2q CALIFORiqIA EDISON 15.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 418.81
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time:~l, 15:46:0
¥
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP ~ 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.49
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7.90
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 204.32
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 197.30
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.15
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.96
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.11
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.72
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.62
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.02
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.28
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,922.85
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.65
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.68
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.43
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.48
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.91
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.92
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.84
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUq~ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.35
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.87
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.63
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.35
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.60
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.87
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.29
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.29
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.17
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.31
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.59
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,788.11
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.77
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.21
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.70
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.31
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.60
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.89
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27,671.72
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, m15:46:0
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 333.25
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.28
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 395.44
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,481.91
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.44
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.55
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.67
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.94
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.71
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.79
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.98
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.74
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.30
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP- 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.92
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.44
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.48
AP - 00225233 7/13/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP- 00225234 7/13/2005 SPARKLETTS 7.50
AP- 00225235 7/13/2005 SPORT CHALET 252.53
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL 1NC 17,793.02
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL [NC 52,564.83
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 ' STANDARD DRYWALL [NC 2,356.69
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL [NC -1,779.30
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL [NC -5,256.48
AP - 00225236 7/13/2005 STANDARD DRYWALL INC -235.67
AP- 00225237 7/13/2005 STOVER SEED COMPANY 323.25
AP - 00225239 7/13/2005 SUNSHINE GROWERS 50.37
AP - 00225240 7/13/2005 SUPERIOR DOOR SYSTEMS [NC 13.28
AP - 00225242 7/13/2005 SYNERGY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 2,668.00
AP 00225244 7/13/2005 THOMSON GALE 148.44
AP 00225244 7/13/2005 THOMSON GALE 26.62
AP 00225245 7/13/2005 TOMARK SPORTS [NC 976.44
AP 00225246 7/13/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 40,708.91
AP 00225247 7/13/2005 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 4,000.00
AP 00225248 7/13/2005 UMPS AREUS ASSOCIATION 160.00
AP 00225248 7/13/2005 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,657.00
AP- 00225253 7/13/2005 UPS 17.54
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 525.74
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 27.85
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timel / 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 59.74
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 60.34
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 28.41
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VEI~IZON 146.41
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 33.80
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.66
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 27.41
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.56
AP - 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 77.47
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 188.07
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 1,200.05
AP - 00225257 7/13/2005 VEPdZON 56.83
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 49.83
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.48
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 690.83
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 393.66
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.62
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 322.92
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 28.41
AP q 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 96.93
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.57
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 86.70
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 251.23
AP - 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 28.84
AP - 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 29.45
AP-00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 467.75
AP- 00225257 7/13/2005 VERIZON 176.00
AP - 00225258 7/13/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 550.00
AP-00225259 7/13/2005 VISTAPAINT 189.04
AP-00225259 7/13/2005 VISTAPAINT 334.47
AP- 00225259 7/13/2005 VISTA PAINT 16.96
AP-00225259 7/13/2005 VISTAPAINT 3.51
AP-00225259 7/13/2005 VISTAPAINT 79.21
AP 00225259 7/13/2005 VISTA PAINT 138.01
AP 00225259 7/13/2005 VISTA PAINT 26.29
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 169.56
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 47.40
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,140.40
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,454.02
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,000.00
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 195.00
AP 00225260 7/13/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 926.38
AP 00225261 7/13/2005 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 953.59
AP- 00225263 7/13/2005 WILLDANASSOCIATES 38,932.50
AP - 00225264 7/13/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,552.64
AP - 00225264 7/13/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,793.36
AP - 00225264 7/13/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 4,122.78
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:l ~n 15:46:0
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name. Amount
AP - 00225264 7/13/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 748.86
AP - 00225264 7/13/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,748.50
AP- 00225265 7/13/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 176.33
AP- 00225266 7/13/2005 YEE, LARRY 110.00
AP-00225267 7/13/2005 YNIGUEZ, TRACY 26.33
AP - 00225268 7/13/2005 YORK INDUSTRIES 711.15
AP - 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICAL 1NC 113.03
AP- 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICAL ]'NC 122.68
AP- 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICALINC 93.89
AP- 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICALINC 77.80
AP- 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICALINC 45.80
AP - 00225269 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 67.29
AP - 00225270 7/13/2005 AACT - MEMBERSHIP 55.00
AP-00225271 7/13/2005 ABLAC 273.17
AP - 00225273 7/13/2005 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 177.01
AP-00225274 7/13/2005 ASCAP 1,091.88
AP - 00225277 7/13/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 22.50
AP- 00225278 7/13/2005 CAPRCBM 165.00
AP- 00225279 7/13/2005 CCPOA REGISTRATION COMMITTEE 195.00
AP- 00225280 7/13/2005 C1RCUITCITY 751.29
AP- 00225281 7/13/2005 CITY OF CLAREMONT 20.00
AP- 00225283 7/13/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP- 00225284 7/13/2005 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP- 00225285 7/13/2005 DELTA DENTAL 31,620.09
AP-00225287 7/13/2005 FATLAND, SANDRA 150.00
AP- 00225289 7/13/2005 GUARDIAN 2,405.96
AP- 00225290 7/13/2005 HERTZ RENTAL CO. ! 12.02
AP- 00225291 7/13/2005 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00225293 7/13/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.80
AP - 00225294 7/13/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.80
AP - 00225295 7/13/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00225295 7/13/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00225295 7/13/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP - 00225295 7/13/2005 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 35.00
AP-00225296 7/13/2005 MSA 190.00
AP - 00225297 7/13/2005 N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD 5.54
AP- 00225298 7/13/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 29,908.62
AP- 00225299 7/13/2005 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 71,855.95
AP- 00225300 7/13/2005 PICON, ADRIAN 31.19
AP- 00225301 7/13/2005 PMI 1,134.00
AP - 00225302 7/13/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 136.20
AP- 00225304 7/13/2005 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 9,500.00
AP- 00225305 7/13/2005 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP-00225307 7/13/2005 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50
AP- 00225308 7/13/2005 RIVERBLUE 950.00
AP 00225309 7/13/2005 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 250.00
AP 00225310 7/13/2005 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 1,646.64
AP 00225312 7/13/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 10,700.00
AP 00225313 7/13/2005 SAN BER.NARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 213.50
AP 00225314 7/13/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 322.50
AP 00225315 7/13/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM 408.00
AP- 00225316 7/13/2005 SBC 1,342.59
AP- 00225316 7/13/2005 SBC 6,658.49
AP- 00225317 7/13/2005 SCOTT, DIANA 250.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAiT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pora'ait Layout Time:~ an 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225318 7/13/2005 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 281.59
AP - 00225319 7/13/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 400.00
AP - 00225319 7/13/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 400.00
AP - 00225320 7/13/2005 SLUKA, SUSAN 600.00
AP-00225321 7/13/2005 SMITH, STEVE 37.71
AP- 00225322 7/13/2005 SONSATIONALACTIVITIES 6,300.00
AP- 00225323 7/13/2005 STOFA, JOSEPH 15.00
AP - 00225324 7/13/2005 SWANK MOTION PICTURES 1NC 271.00
AP-00225325 7/13/2005 UNITEDWAY 554.32
AP- 00225327 7/13/2005 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP-00225328 7/13/2005 WARD, DESIREE 452.50
AP- 00225329 7/13/2005 WILDLIFE COMPANY, THE 285.00
AP- 00225330 7/13/2005 WlRZ, MIKE 57.10
AP- 00225331 7/13/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 505.85
AP - 00225332 7/20/2005 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 302.46
AP - 00225332 7/20/2005 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 296.00
AP - 00225332 7/20/2005 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 50.00
AP - 00225332 7/20/2005 A AND A AUTOMOTIVE 106.21
AP - 00225333 7/20/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 86.81
AP - 00225333 7/20/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 66.80
AP - 00225333 7/20/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 422.30
AP - 00225333 7/20/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,138.45
AP - 00225333 7/20/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.46
AP - 00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 62.84
AP - 00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 15.09
AP-00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS \ 889.36
AP - 00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 114.00
AP - 00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 52.50
AP - 00225334 7/20/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 72.50
AP - 00225335 7/20/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,023.00
AP - 00225336 7/20/2005 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 350.00
AP- 00225337 7/20/2005 ALLCITIES TOOLS 584.93
AP- 00225338 7/20/2005 ALLWELDING 188.56
AP - 00225339 7/20/2005 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 9,051.00
AP - 00225340 7/20/2005 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00
AP - 00225341 7/20/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. 692.63
AP - 00225342 7/20/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 148.68
AP- 00225343 7/20/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191.99
AP- 00225343 7/20/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191.99
AP- 00225344 7/20/2005 ANAHEIM, CITY OF 223,385.28
AP - 00225345 7/20/2005 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,375.00
AP- 00225346 7/20/2005 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 10,141.40
AP - 00225347 7/20/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 12,210.00
AP - 00225347 7/20/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,766.00
AP- 00225348 7/20/2005 AUTO BODY 2000 1,140.02
AP- 00225348 7/20/2005 AUTO BODY 2000 109.25
AP- 00225349 7/20/2005 AUTO SPECIALISTS 381.51
AP- 00225349 7/20/2005 AUTO SPECIALISTS 702.16
AP- 00225349 7/20/2005 AUTO SPECIALISTS 383.96
AP- 00225349 7/20/2005 AUTO SPECIALISTS 379.74
AP - 00225350 7/20/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 59.93
AP - 00225350 7/20/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 62.16
AP - 00225350 7/20/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 403.14
AP - 00225350 7/20/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 14.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTILAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:! ,~ 15:46:0
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount.
AP - 00225350 7/20/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 537.67
AP - 00225351 7/20/2005 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 9,240.00
AP - 00225351 7/20/2005 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 6,965.00
AP - 00225351 7/20/2005 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 4,240.00
AP - 00225352 7/20/2005 BEARFNGS AND DRIVES ]NC 117.34
AP - 00225353 7/20/2005 BEST WESTERN HERITAGE INN 959.00
AP-00225354 7/20/2005 BIAS, GORDON 102.89
AP - 00225355 7/20/2005 BILLIARDS AND BARSTOOLS 24,325.32
AP - 00225355 7/20/2005 BILLIARDS AND BARSTOOLS 92.99
AP- 00225356 7/20/2005 BILTMORE PROJECTS 1NC. 1,199.66
AP- 00225357 7/20/2005 BROCK, DON 150.56
AP - 00225358 7/20/2005 BURR CYCLES INC, JOHN 52.43
AP - 00225358 7/20/2005 BURR CYCLES ]NC, JOHN 46.57
AP - 00225359 7/20/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN ]NC. 331.68
AP - 00225360 7/20/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 1,095.89
AP - 00225360 7/20/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 710.36
AP - 00225360 7/20/2005 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 724.55
AP - 00225361 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 225.00
AP - 00225361 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 190.00
AP - 00225361 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 150.00
AP - 00225361 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 305.00
AP - 00225362 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 503.75
AP-00225363 7/20/2005 CALSENSE 8,455.94
AP-00225364 7/20/2005 CAMEOHOMES 9,412.00
AP- 00225365 7/20/2005 CARON, RON 250.00
AP - 00225366 7/20/2005 CARTER CONSTRUCTION 800.00
AP - 00225366 7/20/2005 CARTER CONSTRUCTION 1,800.00
AP - 00225367 7/20/2005 CHARLES SHERWOOD 250.00
AP - 00225368 7/20/2005 CHARTER MEDIA ]NC. 2,016.00
AP - 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS [NC 12,640.00
AP - 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 780.00
AP - 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 440.00
AP - 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 13,660.00
AP- 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,721.25
AP - 00225369 7/20/2005 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 12,760.00
AP - 00225370 7/20/2005 CLEARWATER POOLS INC. 189.22
AP- 00225371 7/20/2005 COAST RECREATION ]NC 791.81
AP - 00225372 7/20/2005 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES [NC 27,378.00
AP - 00225372 7/20/2005 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES 1NC 1,382.00
AP ~ 00225373 7/20/2005 COASTAL PUBLISHING 199.00
AP- 00225374 7/20/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 219.33
AP - 00225374 7/20/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 276.17
AP - 00225374 7/20/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 40.35
AP - 00225374 7/20/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 76.55
AP - 00225374 7/20/2005 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 29.38
AP - 00225376 7/20/2005 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 775.00
AP- 00225376 7/20/2005 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 213.00
AP - 00225377 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA ESTATES 52 LLC 124.50
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,000.69
AP- 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,172.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,254.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 77.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 889.28
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,076.48
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time:t~ 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,684.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 549.11
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 93.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 631.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT · 512.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,463.83
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 506.23
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 964.28
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 478.88
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.88
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 958.88
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.44
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.44
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,445.59
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.80
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,444.88
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 562.88
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,159.28
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 291.68
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,244.48
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 858.08
AP 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,550.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 560.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,404.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,878.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.78
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 932.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,561.28
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,286.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 669.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.58
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,118.48
AP ~ 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 263.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.28
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 627.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 331.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 713.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 771.08
AP- 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 107.69
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 717.76
AP- 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.38
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 91.28
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.18
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 143.59
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 356.75
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,764.63
AP- 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.68
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:t / 15:46:0
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 thxough 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 495.91
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,027.28
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I49.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 989.48
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 318.08
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 696.68
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 433.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 355.88
AP - 00225380 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 360.68
AP - 00225381 7/20/2005 CUCAMONGA VENTURES 3,150.00
AP - 00225382 7/20/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 474.10
AP - 00225382 7/20/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 301.70
AP - 00225382 7/20/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 608.79
AP - 00225382 7/20/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 709.00
AP - 00225382 7/20/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 560.30
AP - 00225384 7/20/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 4,899.03
AP - 00225385 7/20/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 736.61
AP - 00225385 7/20/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 309.44
AP - 00225385 7/20/2005 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 140.67
AP- 00225386 7/20/2005 DMJMHARRIS 571.60
AP- 00225387 7/20/2005 DOWNS, DALE 290.00
AP-00225388 7/20/2005 DRACHAND, MELISSA 363.00
AP - 00225389 7/20/2005 EMCOR SERVICE 570.00
AP - 00225390 7/20/2005 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 559.83
AP- 00225391 7/20/2005 EMPIRE MOTOR SPORTS 155.81
AP - 00225392 7/20/2005 EN PO1NTE TECHNOLOGIES 1,402.90
AP - 00225392 7/20/2005 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 34.48
AP - 00225393 7/20/2005 ESPINO'S COP SHOP INC 498.50
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,326.15
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 177.55
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 465.61
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 79.53
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 662.15
AP - 00225394 7/20/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 107.15
AP- 00225395 7/20/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 191.48
AP- 00225395 7/20/2005 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 191.48
AP - 00225395 7/20/2005 EXPRESS BILAKE SUPPLY 60.06
AP - 00225396 7/20/2005 FASTENAL COMPANY 87.54
AP - 00225397 7/20/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.74
AP - 00225397 7/20/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.74
AP - 00225398 7/20/2005 FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND ASSOCIATES 7,112.94
AP - 00225399 7/20/2005 FILARSKY AND WATT 400.00
AP - 00225400 7/20/2005 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE INC 140.18
AP- 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00
AP - 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00
AP- 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 667.25
AP - 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 625.50
AP- 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00
AP- 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 840.00
AP- 00225401 7/20/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 720.00
AP- 00225402 7/20/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1,188.53
AP- 00225402 7/20/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 72.65
User: VLOPEZ - Veromca Lopez Page: 17 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time:~ ~15:46:0
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225402 7/20/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 124.75
AP - 00225402 7/20/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 98.17
AP-00225403 7/20/2005 FLEETGLASS 60.00
AP - 00225404 7/20/2005 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 413.00
AP - 00225406 7/20/2005 GALAXY CAMPERS 271.34
AP - 00225407 7/20/2005 GAYLORD BROTHERS 204.53
AP - 00225408 7/20/2005 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL 165.00
AP - 00225408 7/20/2005 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL 110.00
AP 00225409 7/20/2005 GIORDANO, MAKIANNA 261.00
AP 00225411 7/20/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 160.39
AP 00225411 7/20/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 23.47
AP 00225412 7/20/2005 H AND H VALLEY TRUCK 3,744.97
AP 00225413 7/20/2005 HARRIGAN'S 1,681.00
AP 00225413 7/20/2005 HARRIGAN'S 600.00
AP 00225414 7/20/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCKCO INC 217.66
AP - 00225414 7/20/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 159.64
AP - 00225414 7/20/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 190.99
AP- 00225414 7/20/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 412.97
AP - 00225415 7/20/2005 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTKIC INC 70.04
AP - 00225416 7/20/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 44.37
AP - 00225416 7/20/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 67.82
AP - 00225416 7/20/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 577.82
AP - 00225417 7/20/2005 HOSE MAN INC 47.45
AP - 00225417 7/20/2005 HOSE MAN INC 4.67
AP - 00225418 7/20/2005 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 542.18
AP - 00225419 7/20/2005 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIES INC 323.26
AP - 00225420 7/20/2005 HULL AND ASSOC, BRUCE W 25,000.00
AP - 00225421 7/20/2005 HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC 5,262.50
AP - 00225422 7/20/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 207.44
AP - 00225422 7/20/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 312.83
AP - 00225422 7/20/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 581.93
AP - 00225422 7/20/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 124.75
AP - 00225422 7/20/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 21.93
AP - 00225423 7/20/2005 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 1,102.84
AP - 00225423 7/20/2005 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 93.81
AP - 00225423 7/20/2005 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS -97.13
AP - 00225423 7/20/2005 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 93.81
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 184.50
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 175.56
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 175.56
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 175.56
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 175.56
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 184.50
AP - 00225424 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 425.60
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 655.20
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 488.40
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 338.40
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 336.00
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 338.40
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 645.60
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ t~ 15:46:0
I
b
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 673.20
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 157.20
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 603.60
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 294.00
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 566.40
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 315.60
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 676.80
AP - 00225425 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 201.60
AP - 00225426 7/20/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 240.91
AP - 00225426 7/20/2005 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 351.84
AP - 00225427 7/20/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC 80.00
AP - 00225428 7/20/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED 280.35
AP - 00225428 7/20/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED -28.04
AP - 00225428 7/20/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED 1,342.38
AP- 00225428 7/20/2005 ISEC INCORPORATED -134.24
AP - 00225429 7/20/2005 J D C INC 172,670.50
AP-00225430 7/20/2005 JABCO 108.28
AP - 00225431 7/20/2005 KAMRANI, JOSEPH 31.00
AP - 00225432 7/20/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,195.24
AP - 00225435 7/20/2005 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 3,650.00
AP - 00225439 7/20/2005 MANSOURI MSCE PE, IRAJ 2,160.00
AP - 00225440 7/20/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 61.42
AP - 00225440 7/20/2005 MARK CHRIS INC 76.03
AP - 00225441 7/20/2005 MARSHALL AND MCKNIGHT TOWING INC 50.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUM~ING 607.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -151.75
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -83.25
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -159.25
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -39.25
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 157.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -31.25
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 125.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -39.75
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 159.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 637.00
AP - 00225442 7/20/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 333.00
AP - 00225443 7/20/2005 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 120.00
AP - 00225443 7/20/2005 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00225444 7/20/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 351.91
AP - 00225444 7/20/2005 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 185.81
AP - 00225445 7/20/2005 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00
AP - 00225446 7/20/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA Il' 5,002.81
AP - 00225446 7/20/2005 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA I~ -500.27
AP-00225447 7/20/2005 MMASC 12.00
AP-00225447 7/20/2005 MMASC 12.00
AP- 00225447 7/20/2005 MMASC 15.00
AP-00225447 7/20/2005 MMASC 12.00
AP - 00225447 7/20/2005 MMASC 12.00
AP - 00225448 7/20/2005 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP 312.48
AP - 00225450 7/20/2005 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 108.72
AP - 00225451 7/20/2005 MR TS 24HR TOWING 125.00
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 74.66
AP- 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPAAUTO PARTS 83.48
AP- 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.09
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:I/~ 15:46:0
l
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.37
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32.11
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.34
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 369.74
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.77
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 46.71
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.47
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 86.40
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32.27
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.52
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 17.86
AP - 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.16
AP 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 27.33
AP 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 109.97
AP 00225452 7/20/2005 NAPA AUTO PARTS 23.12
AP 00225453 7/20/2005 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 143.52
AP 00225454 7/20/2005 NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES 671.33
AP 00225455 7/20/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 139.17
AP 00225455 7/20/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 84.80
AP 00225455 7/20/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 85.90
AP 00225455 7/20/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 60.02
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 18.54
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 689.49
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT -79.80
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 27.91
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 81.09
AP 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 13.06
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 22.67
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 19.14
AP - 0Q225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 54.76
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 256.26
AP - 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 5.98
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 657.71
AP- 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 30.13
AP - 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 23.00
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 26.47
AP- 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 159.66
AP - 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 17.02
AP- 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 162.80
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 248.00
AP- 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 370.57
AP - 00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 315.72
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 242.69
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 88.96
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 462.00
AP-00225456 7/20/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 217.88
AP - 00225457 7/20/2005 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 864.85
AP - 00225457 7/20/2005 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 665.90
AP - 00225457 7/20/2005 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 252.56
AP- 00225458 7/20/2005 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 714.39
AP - 00225458 7/20/2005 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 952.51
AP- 00225459 7/20/2005 OPEN APPS 616.63
AP- 00225459 7/20/2005 OPEN APPS 1,623.95
AP- 00225459 7/20/2005 OPEN APPS 82.63
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlxait Layout Time:~ _15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225460 7/20/2005 ORACLE CORP 868.59
AP - 00225461 7/20/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 275.00
AP - 00225462 7/20/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 62.82
AP - 00225462 7/20/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 25.64
AP- 00225462 7/20/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 159.45
AP - 00225462 7/20/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 542.63
AP - 00225462 7/20/2005 OWEN ELECTRIC 663.73
AP - 00225463 7/20/2005 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 394.85
AP - 00225464 7/20/2005 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 656.50
AP - 00225465 7/20/2005 PAR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS IONC 500.00
AP - 00225465 7/20/2005 PAR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS IONC 500.00
AP - 00225466 7/20/2005 PARK PLACE RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 3,200.00
AP - 00225467 7/20/2005 PEREZ, CARLOS 1,425.00
AP - 00225468 7/20/2005 PERVO PAINT CO 910.11
AP - 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 126.73
AP - 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,039.89
AP - 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 372.52
AP- 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 381.74
AP - 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 196.66
AP - 00225469 7/20/2005 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC -196.08
AP - 00225470 7/20/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 945.55
AP - 00225470 7/20/2005 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 3,016.62
AP - 00225472 7/20/2005 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 1,112.87
AP 00225473 7/20/2005 PRAXAIRDISTR1BUTIONINC 97.21
AP 00225473 7/20/2005 PRAXAIRDISTRIBUTIONINC 118.16
AP 00225473 7/20/2005 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 77.62
AP 00225474 7/20/2005 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 686.93
AP 00225475 7/20/2005 PROTECH TRANSMISSION SERVICES 2,000.00
AP 00225475 7/20/2005 PROTECH TRANSMISSION SERVICES 484.21
AP 00225476 7/20/2005 QUICK WRAP BAGS 441.89
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 666.65
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 279.54
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 93.26
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 383.89
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 235.99
AP - 00225477 7/20/2005 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 243.59
AP - 00225478 7/20/2005 R H F INC 142.23
AP- 00225480 7/20/2005 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 198.88
AP - 00225481 7/20/2005 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00
AP - 00225481 7/20/2005 RED WING SHOE STORE 132.79
AP - 00225482 7/20/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 48.50
AP - 00225483 7/20/2005 RICHLAND 1NVESTMENYS 908.50
AP - 00225484 7/20/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 40.36
AP - 00225485 7/20/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 241.00
AP - 00225485 7/20/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 163.00
AP - 00225485 7/20/2005 ROBLES SR, PAUL P 95.00
AP - 00225486 7/20/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 191.25
AP - 00225486 7/20/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 190.00
AP - 00225486 7/20/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240.00
AP - 00225489 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,323.82
AP - 00225489 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 3,005.79
AP - 00225489 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4,380.28
AP - 00225490 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,000.08
AP - 00225490 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 992.36
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:,~,~ I 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225491 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARD1NO COUNTY 1,270.00
AP- 00225493 7/20/2005 SBC LONG DISTANCE 614.97
AP- 00225495 7/20/2005 SIERRA SPRINGS 316.50
AP - 00225496 7/20/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 131.46
AP - 00225496 7/20/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 592.63
AP - 00225497 7/20/2005 SIGTRONICS CORPORATION 2,208.44
AP - 00225497 7/20/2005 SIGTRONICS CORPORATION 0.98
AP - 00225498 7/20/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 768.26
AP - 00225498 7/20/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 406.22
AP-00225498 7/20/2005 SIMPLOTPARTNERS 717.62
AP - 00225499 7/20/2005 SMOKE DETECTORS, THE 1,435.00
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 36.33
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 737.08
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 257.92
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 85.54
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 197.32
AP - 00225500 7/20/2005 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,141.87
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERlq CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.87
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.93
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOR3IIA EDISON 32.28
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.82
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.98
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.01
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.43
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 814.38
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.79
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.29
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.93
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.77
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.94
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.64
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.24
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.21
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP ~ 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.19
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP ~ 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOR2qIA EDISON 58.72
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.30
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP- 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.66
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.47
AP ~ 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLtt EDISON 102.72
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.25
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOILNIA EDISON 32.95
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ~n15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.56
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.08
AP- 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.06
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.59
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.86
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 981.17
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.60
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.43
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.64
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.84
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.90
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.28
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.80
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.53
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 732.22
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.25
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.81
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.14
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.76
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.11
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.28
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.07
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.23
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.45
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.66
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.38
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.09
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.93
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.73
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.55
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,060.26
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 940.66
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03
AP- 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.13
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 25.02
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.11
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 182.82
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.91
AP- 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 179.98
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.02
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.46
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.98
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.63
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.93
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP- 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.29
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time.'~ ~[5:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Re~ister
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.28
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.80
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.39
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.65
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.70
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOLrlX-IERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.04
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.57
AP 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.17
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.01
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.67
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.27
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.75
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.48
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.98
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.41
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.34
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.56
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.33
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.27
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.05
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225504 7/20/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225505 7/20/2005 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 913.00
AP - 00225506 7/20/2005 SUNRISE FORD 98.25
AP-00225506 7/20/2005 SUNRISE FORD 20.32
AP - 00225506 7/20/2005 SUNRISE FORD 37.99
AP - 00225507 7/20/2005 SUNSHINE WINDOWS 6,950.00
AP - 00225507 7/20/2005 SUNSHINE W1NDOWS 4,100.00
AP - 00225508 7/20/2005 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 314.69
AP - 00225509 7/20/2005 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,527.17
AP - 00225510 7/20/2005 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 221.79
AP - 00225511 7/20/2005 TAYLOR PORTABLE WELDING 1,000.00
AP- 00225512 7/20/2005 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 11,859.48
AP - 00225513 7/20/2005 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 189.00
AP - 00225514 7/20/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 415.05
AP- 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 25.61
AP- 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 43.86
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 118.13
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 652.85
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 118.13
AP- 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.62
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 716.45
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.61
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 675.99
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 24 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ ~ ~15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 119.83
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UN]FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 118.13
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 43.57
AP- 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 75.61
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 715.34
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.61
AP - 00225515 7/20/2005 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 43.57
AP-00225516 7/20/2005 UPS 23.18
AP-00225516 7/20/2005 UPS 21.45
AP - 00225516 7/20/2005 LIPS 20.16
AP-00225516 7/20/2005 UPS 21.24
AP- 00225516 7/20/2005 UPS 17.01
AP- 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 129.84
AP - 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 52.20
AP - 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.57
AP- 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 183.75
AP- 00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP-00225519 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP - 00225520 7/20/2005 VISTA PAINT 39.96
AP - 00225520 7/20/2005 VISTA PAINT 51.94
AP - 00225521 7/20/2005 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 413.13
AP - 00225522 7/20/2005 VULCAN MATERIALS LA DISTR 144.73
AP - 00225523 7/20/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 20.28
AP - 00225523 7/20/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 54.15
AP - 00225523 7/20/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 17.07
AP - 00225523 7/20/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 22.03
AP - 00225523 7/20/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO -60.93
AP - 00225524 7/20/2005 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 447.68
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 193.20
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 329.72
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 80.86
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 526.02
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 84.30
AP - 00225525 7/20/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 441.18
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 292.40
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 179.18
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 465.12
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 355.30
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 279.48
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 392.36
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 379.78
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 383.86
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 286.96
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 392.70
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 457.64
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 415.82
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 190.74
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 28.22
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 78.10
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 59.18
AP- 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 110.66
AP- 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 59.62
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timg& ~15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 71.50
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 100.98
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 51.92
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 97.02
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 49.72
AP - 00225526 7/20/2005 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 67.76
AP - 00225527 7/20/2005 WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES 8,032.00
AP- 00225528 7/20/2005 WILSONAND BELL 82.58
AP- 00225528 7/20/2005 WILSONAND BELL 105.50
AP - 00225529 7/20/2005 WORK MILL PUBLISHING 475.00
AP- 00225530 7/20/2005 WOW VISUAL CONCEPTS 568.06
AP - 00225531 7/20/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 7,118.50
AP - 00225531 7/20/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,836.55
AP - 00225531 7/20/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,661.90
AP - 00225531 7/20/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 2,760.00
AP - 00225532 7/20/2005 YORK INDUSTRIES 775.80
AP - 00225532 7/20/2005 YORK INDUSTRIES 587.22
AP - 00225533 7/20/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 779.51
AP - 00225533 7/20/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 606.90
AP- 00225534 7/20/2005 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00225535 7/20/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 660.00
AP - 00225537 7/20/2005 ALLISON, ANGELA 360.00
AP - 00225538 7/20/2005 ALPERT, MELANIE 1,500.00
AP - 00225539 7/20/2005 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 35.44
AP - 00225540 7/20/2005 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 500.00
AP- 00225541 7/20/2005 BALDEON, CARLOS 315.00
AP - 00225542 7/20/2005 BALLARD, ROBIN 250.00
AP - 00225543 7/20/2005 BALNEG, RAFAEL 400.00
AP - 00225544 7/20/2005 BANEGAS, SILVIA 150.00
AP - 00225544 7/20/2005 BANEGAS, SILVIA 46.00
AP - 00225545 7/20/2005 BANKENBUSH, MARISSA 76.00
AP- 00225546 7/20/2005 BEENE, NICOLE 40.00
AP - 00225547 7/20/2005 BOCTOR, ALFRED 48.00
AP - 00225548 7/20/2005 BODY SHOTS 689.79
AP - 00225549 7/20/2005 BOPKO, CHRISTOPHER 200.00
AP- 00225550 7/20/2005 BRUCE, INGRID 500.00
AP - 00225551 7/20/2005 BRUNO, ELSIE 250.00
AP - 00225552 7/20/2005 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 423.50
AP - 00225553 7/20/2005 BURKE, KAREN 315.00
AP - 00225554 7/20/2005 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 231.92
AP - 00225557 7/20/2005 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ASSOC 2,240.00
AP- 00225558 7/20/2005 CARAWAY, ROBIN 18.00
AP - 00225559 7/20/2005 CARRILLO, TRINA 354.38
AP - 00225561 7/20/2005 CENTER ICE ARENA 56.00
AP - 00225562 7/20/2005 CHA, JOHN 80.00
AP- 00225563 7/20/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00225564 7/20/2005 CLAPPER, JOHN 40.00
AP- 00225565 7/20/2005 CLARK, KAREN 592.50
AP - 00225566 7/20/2005 CLEARS 25.00
AP-00225567 7/20/2005 CLOUD, DON 467.25
AP- 00225568 7/20/2005 COLORME MINE 285.60
AP - 00225569 7/20/2005 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 2,841.30
AP - 00225570 7/20/2005 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 270.00
AP - 00225572 7/20/2005 CURTIS, SANDRA 40.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~,,~ Jl 5:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 throug~ 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225573 7/20/2005 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY 1,036.80
AP- 00225574 7/20/2005 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,641.60
AP - 00225575 7/20/2005 DAVENPORT, JAY E. 632.00
AP - 00225576 7/20/2005 DAVIS, MARCELLE 120.00
AP - 00225577 7/20/2005 DE SILVA, ALLAN 84.00
AP- 00225578 7/20/2005 DELANY, DANI 147.00
AP- 00225579 7/20/2005 DELEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP-00225580 7/20/2005 DELGADO, JILL 156.00
AP - 00225581 7/20/2005 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 107,100.00
AP- 00225582 7/20/2005 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP- 00225582 7/20/2005 DICK, ERIC 50.00
AP - 00225584 7/20/2005 DRACHAND, DI ANNE 990.00
AP- 00225585 7/20/2005 DRACHAND, MELISSA 363.00
AP - 00225586 7/20/2005 DUARTE, WENDY 21.00
AP - 00225587 7/20/2005 DUFFY, RICK 2,112.25
AP- 00225588 7/20/2005 DUGAN, ALLISON 395.25
AP- 00225589 7/20/2005 DYAN, DIANE 838.50
AP- 00225590 7/20/2005 DYNASTY GYM 2,180.40
AP - 00225591 7/20/2005 EACRETT, STEPHANIE 45.00
AP - 00225592 7/20/2005 EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIO]? 616.00
AP - 00225593 7/20/2005 EXPERIAN 50.00
AP - 00225594 7/20/2005 FERMIN, VICTOR 36.00
AP - 00225595 7/20/2005 FIGUEROA, CAROLYN 51.50
AP - 00225599 7/20/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 107.50
AP - 00225600 7/20/2005 FOWLER, CHRISTINA 45.50
AP - 00225601 7/20/2005 FURMAN, ROLAND 500.00
AP - 00225602 7/20/2005 GAMEZ, MARK 1,500.00
AP - 00225603 7/20/2005 GATMEN, MARY JANE 50.00
AP - 00225604 7/20/2005 GIBBYS FENCING MATERIALS 800.00
AP - 00225605 7/20/2005 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 228.00
AP - 00225606 7/20/2005 GUERRA, KELLY 200.00
AP - 00225607 7/20/2005 HAMPTON, ANTONIA 595.20
AP - 00225608 7/20/2005 HANGER 18 LLC. 420.00
AP - 00225609 7/20/2005 HEILIG, KELLY 793.20
AP - 00225610 7/20/2005 HERNANDEZ, AL 75.00
AP - 00225611 7/20/2005 HERNANDEZ, HECTOR 56.00
AP - 00225612 7/20/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 99.17
AP - 00225613 7/20/2005 HOYT, RAYMOND 889.50
AP - 00225614 7/20/2005 HYATT HOTELS & RESORTS 1,243.13
AP - 00225615 7/20/2005 HYATT HOTELS & RESORTS 1,243.13
AP - 00225616 7/20/2005 HYATT HOTELS & RESORTS 497.25
AP - 00225617 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 172.80
AP - 00225618 7/20/2005 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 2,785.20
AP - 00225620 7/20/2005 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 250.00
AP- 00225621 7/20/2005 JOHNSON, JOSEPH 51.40
AP - 00225622 7/20/2005 KANERIA, NALIN 500.00
AP - 00225623 7/20/2005 KAPLAN, DENEAN 890.40
AP- 00225624 7/20/2005 KELLY EQUIPMENT 50.99
AP - 00225625 7/20/2005 KELLY, SEAN 1,800.00
AP- 00225626 7/20/2005 KIDSART 1,037.40
AP - 00225627 7/20/2005 KlM, STEPHEN 50.00
AP - 00225628 7/20/2005 KLEWER, CANDACE 200.00
AP - 00225629 7/20/2005 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 2,800.00
AP- 00225630 7/20/2005 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 3,546.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veromca Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Por~-ait Layout Tim~;~15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225631 7/20/2005 LANDRUM, RANNAL 250.00
AP - 00225632 7/20/2005 LASALVA, JANUARY 65.00
AP-00225633 7/20/2005 LEE, SANDY 56.00
AP - 00225634 7/20/2005 LIM, HEATHER 784.80
AP - 00225635 7/20/2005 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 765.60
AP - 00225636 7/20/2005 LONESCU, GUADALUPE 56.00
AP-00225638 7/20/2005 LOW,CHOY 56.00
AP - 00225640 7/20/2005 LY, CHANI-I 72.00
AP- 00225641 7/20/2005 MAD SCIENCE 1,750.50
AP - 00225642 7/20/2005 MAGRUDER, KAREN 375.00
AP - 00225643 7/20/2005 MALLON, CHRISTINA 96.95
AP - 00225644 7/20/2005 MANNION, KELLI 65.00
AP - 00225644 7/20/2005 MANNION, KELLI 34.00
AP - 00225645 7/20/2005 MARRIOTT HOTELS & RESORTS 632.61
AP - 00225646 7/20/2005 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,300.80
AP - 00225647 7/20/2005 MCKIERNAN, STACIE 40.00
AP - 00225647 7/20/2005 MCKIERNAN, STACIE 4.00
AP - 00225648 7/20/2005 MCK1NSTRY, PATRICE 49.00
AP - 00225649 7/20/2005 MEDLOCK, DOLLY 36.00
AP - 00225650 7/20/2005 MILLS, CAREY 645.00
AP - 00225651 7/20/2005 MITCHELL, TUWESHA 205.00
AP - 00225652 7/20/2005 MMASC 25.00
AP- 00225653 7/20/2005 MOE, JOHN 459.00
AP - 00225654 7/20/2005 MORALES, CYNTHIA 48.00
AP-00225656 7/20/2005 NASH, JESSICA 395.25
AP - 00225657 7/20/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 17,311.39
AP - 00225658 7/20/2005 NATIONS RENT 70.58
AP - 00225659 7/20/2005 NICHOLS, GARY 735.00
AP - 00225660 7/20/2005 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 72.00
AP- 00225661 7/20/2005 NURMI, SUE 18.87
AP - 00225662 7/20/2005 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 705.60
AP - 00225663 7/20/2005 ORTIZ, DEENA 72.00
AP - 00225664 7/20/2005 ORTIZ, VIRGINIA 45.50
AP - 00225665 7/20/2005 OSONGCO, ARSENIO 40.00
AP - 00225666 7/20/2005 OTSUKA, DENNIS 48.00
AP - 00225667 7/20/2005 PADFIELD, NELLY 500.00
AP ~ 00225668 7/20/2005 PAINO, NICHOLAS 48.00
AP - 00225669 7/20/2005 PEREZ, HECTOR 48.00
AP - 00225670 7/20/2005 PILONIETA, MANUEL 400.00
AP- 00225671 7/20/2005 POLLOCK, RADINA 80.00
AP - 00225672 7/20/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81
AP- 00225673 7/20/2005 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,413.30
AP - 00225674 7/20/2005 RAMOS, GRETTA 360.00
AP- 00225676 7/20/2005 RANSOM, JOANN 90.00
AP - 00225677 7/20/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 48.49
AP-00225678 7/20/2005 RCPFA 7,171.13
AP - 00225679 7/20/2005 ROBERTS, ERIKA 36.00
AP - 00225680 7/20/2005 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 85.00
AP - 00225681 7/20/2005 ROWLAND, DARRYLYN 800.00
AP - 00225682 7/20/2005 RUBEL, SHANNYN 200.00
AP- 00225683 7/20/2005 SALCEDO, BEVERLY 80.00
AP - 00225684 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 31,171.50
AP - 00225687 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 159.90
AP- 00225688 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,544,260.50
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tim_~ ~ 15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Yendor Name Amount
AP - 00225688 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 13,642.50
AP - 00225688 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 40,955.00
AP - 00225688 7/20/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 17,570.00
AP - 00225689 7/20/2005 SANCHES, MANNY 50.00
AP - 00225690 7/20/2005 SAUNDERS, ROBIN 80.00
AP - 00225692 7/20/2005 SCOTT, STEPHANIE 72.00
AP - 00225693 7/20/2005 SHERATON SAN DIEGO HOTEL & MARINA 747.32
AP - 00225694 7/20/2005 SHERATON SAN DIEGO HOTEL & MARINA 747.32
AP - 00225695 7/20/2005 SHERATON SAN DIEGO HOTEL & MARINA 624.49
AP - 00225696 7/20/2005 SHERMAN, MARLO 55.00
AP - 00225697 7/20/2005 SHIELDS, ANA 4.00
AP - 00225697 7/20/2005 SHIELDS, ANA 62.00
AP - 00225697 7/20/2005 SHIELDS, ANA 95.00
AP - 00225697 7/20/2005 SHIELDS, ANA 90.00
AP - 00225698 7/20/2005 SIPHOMSAY, S1D 400.00
AP - 00225700 7/20/2005 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 400.00
AP - 00225704 7/20/2005 STEEVE, ELMER 5.00
AP - 00225705 7/20/2005 STRATFORD, GAYLE 135.00
AP- 00225706 7/20/2005 STRONG, HILA 58.00
AP - 00225707 7/20/2005 SULLIVAN, RHIANNON 32.00
AP - 00225708 7/20/2005 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 271.00
AP - 00225709 7/20/2005 TERRY, DONNA 586.25
AP- 00225710 7/20/2005 THEWES, KRISTINE 585.00
AP - 00225711 7/20/2005 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 58.32
AP - 00225712 7/20/2005 TOLBERT, JUDITH 78.00
AP - 00225713 7/20/2005 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC 153.54
AP- 00225714 7/20/2005 TUTORWHIZ INC 891.80
AP - 00225715 7/20/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 2,841.91
AP - 00225715 7/20/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 33,391.06
AP - 00225716 7/20/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ !,339.15
AP - 00225717 7/20/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00
AP - 00225718 7/20/2005 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 2,145.60
AP - 00225720 7/20/2005 VALENTIN, NATHALIA 85.00
AP- 00225721 7/20/2005 VENTURA, LOUIS 500.50
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 87.74
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 475.32
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 59.79
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 1,262.96
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 131.01
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 91.50
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VEPdZON 29.29
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 153.68
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 36.32
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 93.65
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 90.59'
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 25.31
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.88
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 29 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~d~,l 5:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 56.61
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 42.68
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.74
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 140.86
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.47
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 113.22
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.30
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 38.79
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 38.79
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 41.06
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 74.25
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 53.81
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16'
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 22.96
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.37
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VEKIZON 89.22
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.37
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 60.78
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 31.30
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.75
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.37
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.04
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.48
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 27.41
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.05
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.04
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 133.23
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 32.17
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.37
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.04
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.29
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VEPdZON 29.00
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.88
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92A6
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 304.52
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VEKIZON 161.43
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 44.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 50.66
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.88
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 423.36
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.88
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VEPdZON 33.03
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 30 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time. in. ~l[15:46:0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/13/2005 through 7/26/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.26
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.41
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.93
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 90.64
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VEP, JZON 20.55
AP-00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.76
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VEKIZON 126.72
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERJZON 28.94
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 92.04
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP- 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 20.55
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 21.94
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 29.26
AP - 00225724 7/20/2005 VERIZON 28.75
AP - 00225725 7/20/2005 VIC'TORINO, VALERIE 13.94
AP - 00225726 7/20/2005 VIGILANCE, TEILRENCE 598.00
AP - 00225727 7/20/2005 WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES 14,502.64
AP - 00225~728 7/20/2005 WESTERN, DARNELL 45.50
AP - 00225729 7/20/2005 WONG, WINNIE 20.00
AP - 00225729 7/20/2005 WONG, WINNIE 15.00
AP - 00225730 7/20/2005 WYNDHAM PALM SPRINGS HOTEL 329.85
AP-00225731 7/20/2005 YEE, LARRY 14.00
AP - 00225732 7/20/2005 ZAILO, ROBERT 532.80
AP- 00225733 7/20/2005 ZEE MEDICALINC 215.50
AP - 00225734 7/20/2005 ZEIGLER, STEVEN 43.65
AP - 00225735 7/20/2005 ZETTERBERG, BOB 47.00
AP - 00225736 7/21/2005 LAMBARD INC 3,288.60
AP-00225736 7/21/2005 LAMBARD INC -328.86
AP- 00225737 7/21/2005 RANCHO ETIWANDA 685 LLC 179,724.09
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 37.65
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 35.59
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 186.58
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 68.72
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 58.82
AP - 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 79.66
AP- 00225738 7/26/2005 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 558.99
Total for Check ID AP: 3,973,224.52
Total for Entity: 3,973,224.52
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 31 Current Date: 07/27/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_PdEG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Timed~/ 15:46:0
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffR ort
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Superintendent
S~: APPROVE A CONTRACT EXTENSION WITIt COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES (CO 00-
102) FOR A MAXIMUM OF 6 MONTItS NOT TO EXCEED $175,321 WItlCIt INCLUDES
$20,000 FOR ANTICIPATED EXTRA WORK RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION TO BE
FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($173,503), AND 1700201-5304 ($1,818)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract extension with Coastal Building Services (CO 00-102) for
a maximum of 6 months not to exceed $175,321 which includes $20,000 for anticipated extra work to be funded from
1001312-5304 ($173,503) and 1700201-5304 ($1,818)
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On January 5, 2005, City Council approved a contract extension with Coastal Building Services to provide janitorial
services at city-wide facilities for fiscal year 2004-2005. This contract is under consideration for re-bid; however,
while bid specifications are updated to include the Cultural Arts Center (which will require special cleaning
considerations), staff recommends extending the contract with Coastal Building Services in the interim. Staff has
received a letter from the vendor acknowledging their desire to continue this contract and has requested a "cost of
living" increase, which is the first rate increase they have requested since the initial contract awarded in June 1999.
Staffhas evaluated the request by the contractor and recommends a rate increase of 4.2% be granted. This increase is
based on the May 2005 Consumer Pr/ce Index for Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County index as listed on the
"Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average" published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor. Any additional scope of work identified during the term of the contract would also be charged
at this adjusted rate·
The City has received good response from this vendor and recommends a rate increase of 4·2% and extending their
contract until the formal bid process has been completed.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
T H E C I T Y 0 F
~ANCHO C~UCA~ONGA
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Greg Gunski, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PIGGYBACK CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE
OF ONE NEW DEDICATED CNG (COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS)
STREET SWEEPER FROM KELLY EQUIPMENT OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $228,083.05 TO
BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1188313-5603 0NTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT) AS APPROVED iN THE FY 05/06 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council approve a piggyback purchase of one dedicated
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) street sweeper from Kelly Equipment of Rancho
Cucamonga California in the amount of $228,083.05 to be funded from account
1188313-5603 (Integrated Waste Management) as approved in the FY 05/06
budget.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
SCAQMD rule 1186.1 mandates that the city purchase alternative fueled street
sweepers such as CNG-powered units when replacing or adding to the fleet.
Currently, there are only two manufacturers of street sweepers that meet these
requirements. These are the Elgin Broom Bear from Haaker Equipment and the
Schwartz M-6000-SE-CNG from Kelly Equipment. Staff from both the Fleet and the
Street Maintenance sections evaluated both models and mutually agree that the
Schwartz M-6000 best meets the needs of the department.
A budget amount of $242,500.00 was requested and approved for the new sweeper
in the 2005/06-budget year. Since the time when that amount was approved several
changes have occurred. Due to the limited demand for CNG chassis, large truck
PURCHASE OF ONE NEW DEDICATED CNG STREET SWEEPER
August 3, 2005
Page 2
manufacturers no longer offer a CNG powered chassis for which to build the
sweeper on, leaving the sweeper manufacturers to buy a chassis minus the engine
and then have a separate outfitter install the CNG power plant and fuel system. This
alone adds over $20,000.00 to the cost of the street sweeper. With the rise in steel
prices, a $5,000.00 "steel surcharge" has also been added to the price of current
year street sweepers from Schwartz Industries.
A proposal was received in June of 2005 from Haaker Equipment for a comparable
Broom Bear street sweeper in the amount of $263,967.50, which is markedly higher
than the previous year. Kelly Equipment has one of last year's model chassis
reserved with Schwartz Industries and is offering it to the City as a piggyback
opportunity with the City of Los Angeles World Airports at a significant cost
avoidance of over $35,000.00. Due to the three year bumper-to-bumper warranty
period specified in this piggyback opportunity the City would also realize a
substantial savings in repairs over the standard one-year warranty. Therefore staff
is recommending the piggyback purchase on one CNG powered Schwartz M-6000-
SE-CNG from Kelly Equipment.
Respectfully Submitted,
Will!~ J. O'Neil
City'Engineer
WJO:GG:ju
l~ A N C H 0 C Il C A M 0 N G A
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO RENEW A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN AN
ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $80,000 FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1,
2005 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006, TO HULS ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, WITH AN
OPTION TO RENEW FOR ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, UPON REVIEW
AND CONFIRMATION OF PRICING AND MUTUAL CONSENT, TO A TOTAL OF
THREE YEARS, TO BE FUNDED FROM 1189-3135300
BACKGROUND
In order to meet the mandated 50% diversion rate, the City of Rancho Cucamonga hired Huls
Environmental LLC, to perform a waste audit and help develop and implement new ordinances and
programs to reach this mandate.
In order to meet the requirements of the State granted time extension the City will need to monitor
the progress of these programs and report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board
on a quarterly basis this will be done by City Staff and Huls Environmental LLC.
The review gives the City the opportunity to review the progress made in reaching AB 939 goals
and identify steps that would be necessary to achieve the mandated diversion rate of 50% by
December 31, 2006, as stipulated by the time extension granted by the California Integrated Waste
Management Board.
ANALYSIS
Huls Environmental Management, LLC is performing on going analysis of the City's Solid Waste
Management Program. In requesting our time extension we indicated that we would begin and
establish multi-family recycling programs plus establish a restaurant food waste-composting
program as soon as a facility was established.
We also are evaluating the select load program, C&D Ordinance recycling and school recycling
programs. Huls Environmental is performing these audits and reviewing the waste characterization
studies.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Professional Services Agreement with Huls Environmental, LLC
August 3, 2005
Page 2
RECOMMENDATIONS
Approve a professional services agreement with Huls Environmental LLC, monitor the commercial
sector, restaurant & multi-family waste diversion programs established by ordinance and assist the
current staff in implementing and operating the program. A consultant brings with it, its own trained
staff and expertise in implementing and monitoring a successful commercial, restaurant & multi-
family waste diversion programs. The consultant would work in conjunction with City staff to bring
the waste diversion plan on line in the shortest amount of time and train staff to perform these
functions. Funds for this consultant are budgeted in the 2005-06 City Budget.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
AD ~INI&T~ATIVE ~VIC~&
Staf:f Re rt
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor William J. Alexander, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Direct.~
BY: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager'/'/"
Dawn Haddon, Pumhasing Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVE VENDOR SELECTION AND AWARD A CONTRACT TO IBM
FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN IBM PRODUCTION SERIES SERVER
FOR THE INTEGRATED FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEM (IFAS)
APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED ~65,000.00 FROM ACCOUNT 1714001-5605
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the vendor selection and award a
contract to IBM for the purchase of an IBM Production Series server for the Integrated
Financial Accounting System (IFAS) application and appropriate funds in the amount
not to exceed $65,000.00 from account 1714001-5605.
BACKGROUND
The City has been using the IFAS application services to provide core financial and
human resources functions for over five years. Regular software upgrades are
necessary to maintain vendor support levels. This IBM computer server is required to
support our IFAS application services, including a major application upgrade planned for
this calendar year. This upgrade is required to maintain vendor support and will provide
enhancements that will improve services and reduce the cost of managing IFAS.
Additionally, this server will also provide a test and development platform that is
necessary to support this project as well as on-going maintenance and future upgrades.
The Information Systems Division (IS) provided specifications to Purchasing to develop
the request for bid. Purchasing prepared a formal Request for Bid and sent it to 18
vendors.
Page 2
August 3, 2005
IBM Server
Three (3) vendors responded and Purchasing prepared an analysis for IS review. IS
and Purchasing have determined that IBM is the apparent lowest, responsive bidder in
meeting all of the required specifications.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
[~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ,,V,,~
BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineet,,/_,N '~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~'t~ ~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $998,694.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., FOR THE BASE BID OF THEIR
PROPOSAL, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY
IN THE AMOUNT OF $99,869.40 FOR THE FY 2005/06 LOCAL STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, TO BE
FUNDED FROM CDBG FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 12043145650/1527204-0 AND
MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1022176-0 AND
APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $410,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO.
11763035650/1022176-0 FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $998,694.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Laird
Construction Co., Inc., for the Base Bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10%
contingency in the amount of $99,869.40, for the FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation
- Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from CDBG funds, Account No. 12043145650/1527204-
0 and Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1022176-0 and appropriate an additional
amount of $410,000.00 to Account No. 11763035650/1022176-0 from Measure I fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 28, 2005, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $935,373.75 for the Base Bid. Staff has reviewed all
bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any
irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and
finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The construction of this project is to rehabilitate local streets in various neighborhoods throughout
the City. The scope of work includes clearing and grubbing, cold milling, crack sealing, asphalt
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Awa~ and Execute Contra~forthe FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay
August3,2005
Page 2
concrete overlay, re-striping and replacing pavement markings. Also, protect and/or adjust valve
covers, protect existing survey monuments and manholes. The contract documents call for forty-five
(45) working days to complete this construction.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil' ~ O. ONeil
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:Is
Attachment
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 28, 2005 Apparent Low Bidder
FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - ENGINEERS COST
Overlay of Various Streets ESTIMATE Laird Construction Co., Inc. Silvia Construction, Inc.
UNIT I UNIT I BID CORRECTE£ UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST , AMOUNT COST i AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
O. 12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface I ] '
1. 18397 TONS preparation and protection of existing utilities $40.00 [ $45.60]
survey monument, re-striping and pavement $735,880.0C $42.00, $772,674.00 $772,674.01] $838,903.20
markings I I
Variable cold plane (0-0.12' 6') from edge of
2.
8791~
[ $1.00 $87,915.00[ $87,915.01] $1.00 $87,915.00
SY
~avement as shown on detail, see specifications $1.251 $109,893.75
3.! 88 EA Adjust manhole frameto finish grade $250.00 $22~000.01] $250.001 $22,000.00[I $22~000.00 $430.001 $37~840.00
4. 216 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $150.00 $327400.01] $50.001 $10~800.001 $10~800.0~ $31.00 $6~696.00
5. 21 EA Adiust waterMeter to finish grade $200.00 $4~200.01] $185.001 $3~885.001 $3~885.0C $340.00 $7~140.00
6. 4 EA Adiust sewercleanout to finish grade $250.00$1~000.01] $185.00 $740.00l $740.01] $205.001 $820.00
7. 1 ES Fraffic Control $30,000.00[ $30,000.01] t;100,680.00 $100,680.00[ $100,680.013 $71,000.001 $71,000.00
I
TOTALBASE BID [ $935,373.75 [ $998,700.013 $998,694.00 :$1,050,314.20
ADDITIVE BID MAP "K" ALTERNATE I
0.12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface
8. 872 TONS preparation and protection of existing utilities
survey monument, re-striping and pavement $40.00 $34,880.00 $42.00 $36,624.00 $36,624.00 $45.55 $39,719.60
markings
9. 4167 SY Variable cold plane (0-0.12' 6') from edge of $1.25 $1.00
~avement as shown on detail, see specifications $5,208.75 $4,167.00 $4,167.00 $1.02 $4,250.34
10. 8 EA Adiust manhole frame to finish grade $250.00 $2,000.00 $250.001 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $430.00 $3~440.00
11. 9 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $150.00 $1:350.00 $50.001 $450.001 $450.00 $54.00 $486.00
12. 4 EA Adiust water Meter to finish grade $200.00 $800.00 $185.001 $740.00 $740.00 $340.001 $1~360.00
13. 1 LS Traffic Control $2~000.001 $2~000.00 $11~250.001 $11~250.00 $11~250.00 $6~850.001 $6~850.00
~ I
TOTALi MAP "K" ALTERNATE ADDITIVE BID II $46~238.75 $55,231.00I~ $55,231.00 i $56~105.94
ADDITIVE BID MAP "L" ALTERNATE - ' I I
0.12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface
14. 1147 TONS preparation and protection of existing utilities
survey monument, re-striping and pavement $40.00 $45,880.00 $42.00 $48,174.00 $48,174.00 $45.00 $51,615.00
markings
15. 5480 SY Variable coldplane (0-0.12' 6') fromedge of $5,480.00 $1.00
>avement as shown on detail, see specifications $1.25 $6,850.00 $1.00 $5,480.00 $5,480.00
16. 11 EA Adiust manhole frame to f'mish grade $250.00 [ $2~750.00 $250.001 $2~750.00 $2~750.00 $425.001 . $4~675.00
17. 13 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $150.00I, $1~950.00 $50.00 $650.00 $650.013 $41.00 $533.00
18. 1 EA Adiust water Meter to finish grade $200.00 I $200.00 $185.00 $185.00 $185.00 $340.00 $340.00
19. I LS Traffic Control $2~000.00I $2~000.00 $11,250.001 $11~250.00, $11~250.00 $8~350.00[ $8~350.00
Sheet 1 TOTAL BASE AND ADDITIVE BID $1~041~242.50 $1,122,420.00 $1~122~414.00 I$1~177,413.14
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 28, 2005
FY 2005/06 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -
Overlay of Various Streets Vance Corporation Matich Corporation
UNIT I UNIT
NO QTY UNIT i DESCRIPTION COST i AMOUNT COST i AMOUNT
0.12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface I
1. 18397 TONS preparationandprotectionofexistingutilities $54.001 $993,438.00 $53.001 $975,041.00
;urvey monument, re-striping and pavement
markings [
2. 87915: SY Var ab e coldplane (0-0.12' 6') fromedge of [ I
pavement as shown on detail, see specifications $1.00/ $87,915.0£ $1.20i $105,498.00
3. 88 EA Adiust manhole frame to finish grade $310.001 $27~280.00 $225.001 $19,800.00
4 216 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $58.00 $12~528.012 $100.001 $2L600.00
5. 21 EA Adiust water Meter to finish grade $100.00 $2~100.012 $385.00 $8~085.00
6. 4 EA Adiust sewer cleanout to finish grade $200.00 $800.00 $200.00 $800.00
7. LS Traffic Control $71~800.001 $71~800.00 ~;159J58.001 $159,158.00
I
TOTAL BASE BID i$1,195,861.00 151,289,982.00
ADDITIVE BID MAP "K" ALTERNATE
0.12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface '
8. 872 TONS preparation and protection of existing utilities
survey monument, re-striping and pavement $54.00 $47,088.00 $53.00 $46,216.00
markings
9. 4167 SY Variable cold plane (0-0.12' 6') from edge of $2.00
mvement as shown on detail, see specifications $8,334.00 $1.20 $5,000.40
10. 8 EA Adiust manhole frame to finish grade $310.00 $2,480.00 $225.001 $1,800.00
11. 9 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $69.00 $621.00 $100.001 $900.00
12. 4 EA Adiust water Meter to finish grade $105.001 $420.00 $385.001 $1~540.00
13. 1 LS rrafficControl $5,500.001 $5~500.00 $12~611.601 $12~611.60
I
TOTAL MAP "K" ALTERNATE ADDITIVE BID $641443.00 [ $68,068.00
ADDITIVE BID MAP "L" ALTERNATE
0.12' Asphalt Concrete Overlay including surface
14. 1147 TONS preparation and protection of existing utilities
survey monument, re-striping and pavement $51.00 $58,497.00 $53.012 $60,791.00
markings
15. 5480 SY Variable cold plane (0-0.12' 6') from edge of $1.20
~avement as shown on detail, see specifications $1.50 $8,220.00 $6,576.00
16. 1 EA Adiust manhole frame to finish grade $300.00 [ $3~300.00 $225.00 $2~475.00
17. 13 EA Adiust water and gas valve to finish grade $50.00 $650.00 $100.00 $L300.00
18. 1 EA Adjust water Meter to finish grade $105.00 I $105.00 $385.00 $385.0C
19. 1 LS Traffic Control $5~300.00] $5~300.012 $9~991.00 $9~991.012
TOTAL MAP "L" ALTERNATE ADDITIVE BID I $76,072.012 $81,518.012
I $11439,568.00
Sheet 2 TOTAL BASE AND ADDITIVE BID [$1,336~376.00
VICINITY MAP
.~1/ / F~-c -J '-~ -
: t,_.._l..._.l_.."~%~.'_~..,,~._.._..~.,.
, , ·
,, ~~i~ I ~.",~ I. \
~-~7'-x-~ ~[ ' ~ I ~ ii ii ~ I z
I 'iLl~~--~~ X~_~ W~~ /~ I~
~ ~ L ',, 1=__-.2
RE FOR REH~.
(&c. o~
~ gO0~/O0 PAYMENT RE~I~TATION
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRepol¢
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria Perez, Associate Engineer \,'. ~(~"
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~)J~)
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $445,545.00 TO THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., AND AUTHORIZE
THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,554.50
FOR THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO
ARROW ROUTE, TO BE FUNDED FROM SB 325 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
11803035650/1472180-0, TEA -21 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
12083035650/1472208-0, AND MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
11763035650/1472176-0, AND APPROPRIATE $490,099.50 (CONTRACT AWARD
OF $445,545.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,554.50) TO
ACCOUNT NO. 11803035650/1472180-0 ($105,118.86) FROM SB 325 FUND
BALANCE, ACCOUNT NO. 12083035650/1472208-0 ($314,000.00) FROM TEA-21
FUND BALANCE, AND ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1472176-0 ($84,000.00)
FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $445,545.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, Laird
Construction Co., Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$44,554.50, for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8m Street to Arrow Route, to be
funded from SB 325 funds, Account No. 11803035650/1472180-0, TEA-21 funds, Account No.
12083035650/1472208-0, and Measure I funds, Account No. 11763035650/1472176-0, and
appropriate $490,099.50 (Contract award of $445,545.00 plus 10% contingency in the amount of
$44,554.50) to Account No. 11803035650/1472180-0 ($105,118.86) from SB 325 fund balance,
Account No. 12083035650/1472208-0 ($314,000.00) from TEA fund balance, and Account No.
11763035650/1472176-0 ($84,000.00) from Measure I fund balance.
CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Bids Received and Award Contract - Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th St. to Arrow Rte.
August 3, 2005
Page 2
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on July 12, 2005, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $412,545.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities
to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
The construction of this project is to rehabilitate Grove Avenue from 8th Street to Arrow Route
consisting of, but not limited to, saw cutting, removal of existing asphalt concrete, cold milling, crack
sealing, placing crushed aggregate base and base paving, installing concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, drive approaches and cross gutters. Additionally, the project includes a minor correction
to the cross-gutter at San Bernardino Road and Grove Avenue to improve drainage flow. The
contract documents call for forty-five (45) working days to complete this construction.
The City of Upland approached staff relative to frontage improvements on the west side of Grove
Avenue within Upland. Staff has prepared an agreement for the City of Upland to reimburse Rancho
Cucamonga for the improvements placed. The Upland podion of the bid currently stands at
$28,000.00. Upland City Council has approved the expenditure of up to $35,000.00, leaving plenty
of funds for unforeseen changes within their podion of the project.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP/RO:Is
Attachment
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JULY 12, 2005 APPARENT LOW BIDDER
Grove Avenue Street Improvements ENGINEERS COST Laird Construction Co., Sully-Miller Contracting R.J. Noble Company
from 8th Street to Arrow Route ESTIMATE Inc. Company
UNIT] UNITI UNIT UNIT i
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST [ AMOUNT
1. I LS Clearing&Grubbing $15,000.00[ $15,000.00 $26,066.001 $26,066.00 $5,000.00' $5,000.00 $27,000.00[ $27,000.00!
2. 72390 SF RemoveA.C. Pavement, including ACberm and sawcuttir $0.50 $36,195.00 $0.35 $25,336.50 $0.27 $19,545.30 $0.42[ $30,403.80
3. 4 EA Remove Tree $500.00 $2,000.00 $250.00 $ i,000.00 $200.001 $800.00 $190.001 $760.00
4. 3 EA Relocate Mailbox $80.001 $240.00 $250.00 $750.00 $200.00[ $600.00 $240.001 $720.00
5. I LS Removeexistingpipeson private property. Pipes maybe $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $16,400.00] $16,400.00
6. 1440 CY Jnclassified Excavation (F) $t5.00 $21,600.00 $30.001 $43,200.00 $32.001 $46,080.00 $29.001 $41,760.00
7. 2400 TON 2.onstruct6"CrushedAggregateBase $18.00 $43,200.00 $23.5ol $56,400.00 $27.00] $64,800.00 $21.ool $50,400.00
8. 220( TON 3onstruct Asphalt Concrete Pavement $45.00! $99,000.00 $45.001 $9%000.00 $52.ool $114,400.00 $51.6ol $113,520.00
9. 100£ TON ~,sphaltOoncreteOveday, including crack seal and weed $45.00 $45,000.00 $45.00 $45,000.00 $52.ool $52,000.00 $54.50 $54,500.00
10. 285(; SY ¢ariable Cold Plane 0' - 0.10' $2.50 $7,125.00 $3.00 $8,550.00 $1.751 $4,987.50 $3.40 $9,690.00
11. 380(2 S¥ nstall Pavement Reinforcing Fabric. Including Tack Coat $1.40 $5,320.00 $1.15 $4,370.06 $1.001 $3,800.00 $1.06 $4,028.00
12' 16 EA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $400.001 $6,400.00 $275.00! $4,400.012 $350.00 $5,600.00 $300.00 $4,800.00
13 14 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $200.00 $2,800.00 $50.001 $700.05 $150.00 $2,100.00 $32.00 $448.00
14 EA Adjust Storm Drain Manhole to Grade $500.00 $500.00 $250.001 $250.0¢ $350.001 $350.00 $300.00 $300.00
15. 160 SF Grouted Rock Rip Rap $10.00 $1,600.00 $15.001 $2,400.0(; $11.00[ $1,760.00 $50.00 $8,000.00
16. EA Construct Undersidewatk Drain $3,000.001 $3,000.00 $4,500.001 $4,500.0(3 $4,500.00] $4,500.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00
17. 360 LF Construct 8' P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter, including removal i $2o.ool $7,200.00 ' $27.501 $9,900.0(2 $26.ool $9,360.00 $31.50 $11,340.00
18. 185 LF Construct 6" P.C.C. Curb & 18" Gutter, including removah $18.00 $3,330.00 $30.001 $5,550.0(3 $25.001 $4,625.00 $31.50 $5,827.50
19. 720 SF Construct 6" P.C.C. Driveway Approach, including remora $7.00 $5,040.00 $6.50[ $4,680.00 $8.001 $5,760.00 $9.20 $6,624.00
20. 2430 SF Construct S" P.C.C. Driveway Approach, includingremova $9.00 $21,870.00 $7.501 $18,225.00 $8.001 $19,440.00 $7.901 $19,197.00
21. 1050 SF Construct 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $4.00! $4,200.00; $5.251$5,512.5(3 $6.001 $6,300.00 $8.20 $8,610.00
22. 185 SF Construct P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $7.001 $1,295.001 $1o.ool $1,850.00 $8.001 $1,480.00 $7.10 $1,313.50
23. 2070 SF ConstructPC.C. CrossGutter&Spandrels $9.001 $18,630.0( $9.501 $19,665.00 $9.ool $18,630.00 $9.20 $19,044.00
24. 250 LF Construct Retaining Curbs $20.00] $5,000.0C $25.00 $6,250.00 $23.001 $5,750.00 $20.00 $5,0o0.00
25. 2 EA AdjustWaterMeterBoxto'Grade $150.00 $300.0(; $150.00 $300.0 $150.001 $300.00 $215.00 $430.00
26. 39 EA ReptacelnductiveLoopDetectors $300.00 $11,700.0(3 $210.00 $8,190.00 $200.001 $7,800.00 $200.001 $7,800.00
27. 1 LS Restore Landscape and Irrigation System $1,000.00 $1,000.0(3 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00! $2,500.00 $1,600.001 $1,600.00
28. 1 LS Traffic Stdping and Signs, includingremovalofexisting $12,000.001 $12,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.001 $?,500.00 $8,563.201 $8,563.20
29. 1 LS Traffic control $20,000.001 $20,000.0(3 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $46,932.201 $46,932.20 $13,000.00 $13,000.00
.30. 4 EA Construction Notification Sign $500.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $2,000.0O $450.001 $1,800.00 $480.00 $1,920.00
31. 1 LS SWPPP $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00
~ Page 1 TOTAL [*412,545.00 15445,545.00 $469,000.00 15479,999.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JULY 12, 2005
Grove Avenue Street Improvements Gentry Brothers, Icc. All American Asphalt Matich Corporation Hardy & Harper, Inc~
from 8th Street to Arrow Route
UNITI UNIT UNITI UNIT
NO QTY~ UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST ANIOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1~ LS Clearing&Grubbing $75,ooo.ool$75,000.00 $13,000.00, $13,000.0(3 $105,147.00 $105,147.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.0(2
2. 7239C SF RemoveA.C. Pavement, including AC berm and sawcuttir $0.501 $36,195.00 $1.451 $104,96550i $0.60 $43,434.00 $1.50 $108,585.0C
3. q EA Remove Tree $800.00 $3,200.00 $25o.ool st,coo.co; $1,ooo.ooI $4,000.00 $660.00 $2,640.0£
4. 3 EA Relocate Mailbox $100.00 $300.00 $250.00 $750.0(3 $900.001 $2,700.00 $500.001 $1,500.00
5. LS Remove existing pipeson private property. Pipes may be $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
6. 14413 CY Unctassified Excavation (F) $50.00 $72,000.00 $40.001 $57,600.00 $37.001 $53,280.00 $50.00 $72,000.00
7. 240(3 TON Construct 6" Crushed Aggregate Base $20.00 $48,000.00 $30.001 $72,000.00 $26.50 $63,600.00 $35.00 $84,000.00
8. 220(3 TON Construct Asphalt Concrete Pavement $43.00 $94,600.00 $49.001 $107,800.00 $59.50 $130,900.00 $60.00 $132,000.00
9. 1000 TON Asphalt Concrete Overlay, including crack seal and weed $45.001 $45,000.00 $55.00 $55,000.00 $59.50 $59,500.00 $70.00 $70,000.00
10. 2850 SY VariableOoldPlane0'-0.10' $2.ool $5,700.00 $2.55 $7,267.50 $3.20 $9,120.00 $3.00 $8,550.00
11. 380(3 SY Install Pavement Reinforcing Fabric. Including Tack Coat $1.251 $4,750.00 $0.70 $2,660.00 $1.10 $4,180.00 $2.50 $9,500.00
12. 16 mA Adjust Manhole Frame & Cover to Finish Grade $300.001 $4,800.00 $500.001 $8,000.00 $325.00] $5,200.00 $250.00 $4,000.00
13. i4 EA Adjust Water Valve Box & Cover to Finish Grade $20.00 $280.00 $175.00 $2,450.00 $225.00 $3,150.00 $200.00 $2,800.00
14. EA Adjust Storm Drain Manholeto Grade $300.00 $300.00 $500.00 $500.00 $325.00 $325.00 $200.00 $200.00
15. 1613 SF Grouted Rock Rip Rap $8.00 $1,280.00 $23.00, $3,680.00 $26.00 $4,160.00 $53.00 $8,480.00
16.' EA Construct Undersidewalk Drain $800.00 $800.00 $6,500.001 $6,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $4,900.00 $4,900.00
17., 360 LF Construct S" P.C.C. Curb & 24" Gutter, including removal , $25.001 $9,000.00 $38.00[ $13,680.00 $45.00! $16,200.00 $28.00 $10,080.00
18.[ 185 LF Construct 6" P.C.C. Curb& 18"Gutter, including removal , $23.001 $4,255.00 $30.00 $5,550.00 $52.501 $9,712.50 $28.00 $5,180.00
19. 720 SF Construct 6" P.C.C. Driveway Approach, including remov~ $5.00[ $3,600.00 $8.30 $5,976.00 $11.50 $8,280.00 $9.00 $6,480.00
20. 2430 SF Construct8"P.C.O. Driveway Approach, includingremov~ $8.001 $19,440.00 $11.101 $26,973.00 $9.75 $23,692.50 $6.50 $15,795.00
21. 1050 SF Construct4" P.C.C. Sidewalk $4.001 $4,200.00 $5.451 $5,722.50 $9.00 $9,450.00 $7.00[ $7,350.00
22. 185 SF Construct P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp $7.ool $1,295.00 $8.1ol $1,498.50 $20.50 $3,792.50 $7.00 $1,295.00
23. 2070 SF ConstructP.C.C. Cross Gutter & Spandrels $7.00 $14,490.00 $11.10 $22,977.00 $8.75 $18,112.50 $7.00 $14,490.00
24. 250 LF Construct Retaining Curbs $20.00 $5,000.00 $25.00 $6,250.00 $38.00 $9,500.00 $20.00 $5,000.00
25. 2 EA Adjust Water Meter 8ox to Grade $50.00 $100.00 $250.00 $500.00 $375.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
26. 39 EA Replace lnduc(3ve Loop Detectors $250.00 $9,750.00 $175.001 $6,825.00 $200.00 $7,800.00 $205.00 $7,995.00
27. LS Restore Landscape and Irrigation System $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,000.001 $11,000.00 $13,000.001 $13,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.0(3
28. 1 LS Traffic Stdping and Signs, including removalofexisting $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.0(3
29. 1 LS Traffic control $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $43,000.00 $43,000.00 $39,000.00 $39,000.00 $50,000.00! $50,000.0(3
30. 4 EA Construction Notification Sign $300.00 $l,200.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,200.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.0(3
31. I LS SWPPP $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0(3
,,~ Page 2 TOTAL $502,035.00 $629,425.00 $686,686.00 I $729,120.0(2
VICINITY MAP
GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FROM 8TH ST. TO ARROW RTE.
AND "'
SAN BERNARDINO RD. CROSS GUTTER
FROM GROVE AVE. TO APPROX. 100' E/O GROVE AVE.
PROJECT
LOCATION
Hillside R~
,, ~ m · u./.-,,mlson Av
- Route 30
~g~: hland Ay
Base ;a~:e L~ne Rd'
w Rt
4th
.
T H E C I T Y O F
l~A N C H 0 C U CA~I 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Fabian A. Villenas, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF A SOLE SOURCE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETVVEEN ALL CITY
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO PROVIDE SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD
SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a sole source
Professional Services Agreement with All City Management Services to provide
school crossing guard services to be funded from 1001701-5300.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City has provided crossing guards at elementary schools for a number of years,
with an expansion to some junior high schools several years ago. The City provides
the funding for the program. Crossing guards are requested by the schools and
reviewed by the Engineering and Police Departments as to the need. Our Personnel
Division recruits for the crossing guards and the Police Department supervises the
program.
Over the last several years, several issues have arisen regarding the program such
as the difficulty in recruiting crossing guards and the increasing number of requests
for guards from the School Districts. As the number of crossing guard locations
increases due to the growing community, so does the cost and the challenge for
recruiting and retaining crossing guards. An enormous amount of time and effort is
needed in order to administer, train, recruit, schedule, and supervise the 48 crossing
guards needed to cover all the elementary schools (and some middle schools) within
the city limits. Currently, this task is assigned to a Sheriff's Service Specialist, who
spends a minimum of fifty percent of her time overseeing the crossing guard
program, preventing the Sheriff's Service Specialist from responding to the more
Page 2
August 3, 2005
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF A SOLE SOURCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO PROVIDE SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
routine calls for service in the community, and thus not freeing up sworn deputies to
respond to more critical calls.
The crossing guard program also suffers from a chronic shortage of crossing guards.
At any given time, the program is short 8-10 crossing guards. In the past, Sheriff's
deputies were asked to fill in for absent crossing guards, which, as you can imagine,
is costly and takes them away from true law enforcement efforts. Throughout this
time, the school districts have periodically requested more and more crossing
guards.
The difficulties and drain of law enforcement resources in running the crossing guard
program forced staff to explore other options. At its retreat earlier this year, the City
Council had also asked staff to "think outside-the-box" in considering alternatives to
this issue. Options considered were:
School District Financial Support: In July 2004, the City asked Alta Loma School
District, Etiwanda School District, Central School District, and Cucamonga School
District to assist by equally sharing the costs of the crossing guard program. A letter
was sent to each School Superintendent asking each District to contribute 50% of
the cost according to the number of hours crossing guards work in each District. All
four school districts rejected the request.
Volunteers: Outreach efforts were made to utilize volunteers for unfilled crossing
guard locations. Flyers were printed and volunteer requests were made of the
Citizens Patrol and with other volunteer organizations. Additionally, the School
Districts and individual schools were asked to solicit volunteers from the parents.
There was little if any response.
In addition to not being able to recruit volunteers, it should be noted that it is difficult
to run a crossing guard program with volunteers. Because they have no contractual
obligation or financial incentive, crossing guard volunteers cannot always be relied
upon to consistently show up for duty, something that is extremely important for
crossing guards. Also, liability issues are a concern with having volunteers crossing
children in traffic. Equity issues also exist when some crossing guards are paid
while others are not.
Contracting Out: Police Department staff has solicited a proposal from All City
Management Services (ACMS) to take over the administration of the crossing
guards in the city. The proposal charges a flat rate of $13.79 per hour, per guard for
an estimated total of $271,388 annually ($13.79 per hour x 19,680 hours). This rate
includes all supervision and administrative costs.
Page 3
August 3, 2005
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF A SOLE SOURCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO PROVIDE SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
ACMS is a full service contractor. They assume full responsibility for screening,
recruitment, staffing, training, equipment, payroll, and field supervision. ACMS
maintains alternate guards, a paging system and a 24 hour 800 message center to
ensure adequate back-up and immediate back-up for absent crossing guards. The
contractor will be required to maintain a two million dollar ($2,000,000) liability
insurance policy as well as workers' compensation insurance.
All of our current crossing guards would be retained at their current pay rate and
become employees of the vendor. ACMS currently provides crossing guard services
for many local cities including Upland, Ontario, Montclair, Claremont, Colton, and
Fontana. The vendor would be able to draw from this large pool to fill in absent
crossing guard locations. Staff has not been able to identify another vendor that
provides such a service in this area.
The table below compares the cost of ACMS's proposal versus the current in-house
crossing guard program, including the administrative costs (50% of Sheriff's Service
Specialist salary and benefits) associated with the program.
The current crossing guard program also creates indirect costs that, although difficult
to measure, can be significant. The City's Personnel division recruits, does
background checks, and processes new hires. As City employees, the crossing
guards increase the City's liability exposure and workers' compensation exposure.
All City Management City Run Program
Services Proposal
Direct Costs $271,388 $193,848
Other Costs 0 $26,000 (SSS salary)
Indirect Costs 0 Can be Significant
Total $271,388 $219,848
Difference ($51,540)
Although the ACMS proposal costs are $51,540 higher, staff feels that it would lead
to a more efficient use of police resources and, when factoring many of the indirect
costs associated with the current program, is comparable to the current costs.
Page 4
August 3, 2005
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF A SOLE SOURCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO PROVIDE SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
The FY 2005-2006 adopted budget has $291,550 budgeted in anticipation of
transferring to a private vendor. The City will only pay for actual hours worked and is
not committed to any minimum monthly charges.
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional
Services Agreement with All City Management Services for school crossing guard
services to be funded from 1001701-5300.
Respectfully Submitted,
Fabian A. Villenas
Management Analyst II
Attachment: Professional Services Agreement
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is entered into this 3rd day of August, 2005 by and between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and All City Management
Services, Inc., a private corporation ("CONTRACTOR").
RECITALS
A. CITY has determined that it requires a contractor to provide Crossing Guard
services at certain times and locations with the City o£Rancho Cucamonga.
B. CONTRACTOR represents that it is fully qualified to provide such services by
virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise, and that of its principals and
employees. CONTRACTOR further represents that it is willing to accept responsibility for
performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions herein
contained, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as £ollows:
1. CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES
A. Scope of Services. CONTRACTOR shall provide Crossing Guard services as
more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
CITY shall have the right to request, in writing, changes in the scope of work, the services to be
per£ormed, and work schedules and/or locations. The parties agree that the total number of hours
o£ Crossing Guard services to be per£ormed shall not exceed Nineteen Thousand Six Hundred
Eighty (19,680) hours per year, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
B. Time for Performance. CONTRACTOR shall commence the services as
scheduled by the CITY, at the times and locations set forth in Exhibit "B."
C. Standard of Performance. CONTRACTOR shall perform all work to the highest
professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall
comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations.
CONTRACTOR shall provide adequate supervision of its crossing guards to ensure that the
Crossing Guard services are being properly and timely performed as required by this Agreement.
D. Personnel. CONTRACTOR represents that it will provide fully trained, qualified,
uniformed and equipped, and competent persons to serve as crossing guards and to perform the
services required under this Agreement. CITY shall designate in writing a representative who
shall have direct responsibility for management of CONTRACTOR'S services under this
1
RC-agreement-crossing guards
Agreement. CONTRACTOR understands ~nd agrees that the nature of each crossing guard's
duties will involve contact with minors. In order to fully protect the health and safety of such
minors, CONTRACTOR agrees and warrants that no person serving as a crossing guard pursuant
to this Agreement has been or is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to California
Penal section 290 or comparable state or federal statute, or has ever been convicted of any crime
against, or involving, a minor, under the laws of any state or country. CONTRACTOR agrees
that CITY shall have the right to require, on a non-discriminatory basis, any or all crossing
guards to be fingerprinted or be subject to "livescan" at CONTRACTOR'S expense for purposes
of conducting a criminal background check to ensure compliance with this subsection.
E. Permits and Licenses. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and maintain during the
Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision
of services under this Agreement, including a City of Rancho Cucamonga business license.
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement shall be One (1) year(s) and shall be effective as of the date
of mutual execution and for such term thereafter as the parties may agree upon.
3. COMPENSATION
CITY agrees to compensate CONTRACTOR for the services provided under this
Agreement, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full satisfaction for such services, the sum
of Thirteen Dollars and Seventy-Nine Cents ($13.79) per hour of Crossing Guard services
provided. The parties agree that the total cost for providing the number of hours of Crossing
Guard services specified in Exhibit "A" shall not exceed Two Hundred Seventy One Thousand
Three Hundred Eighty Eight Dollars ($271,388) per year, unless otherwise agreed upon in
writing.
4. METHOD OF PAYMENT
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY an invoice, on a monthly basis or less frequently,
for the services performed pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall itemize the services
rendered during the billing period and the amount due. Within ten business days of receipt each
invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of any disputed amounts included on the
invoice. Within thirty calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY shall pay all undisputed
amounts included on the invoice. CITY shall not withhold applicable taxes or other authorized
deductions from payments made to CONTRACTOR. At any time during regular working hours,
all records, invoices, and other materials accounting the services shall be available for review and
audit by CITY.
2
RC-agreement-crossing guards
5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All reports, documents or other written material developed by CONTRACTOR in the
performance of this Agreement, including any and all intellectual property and proprietary rights
arising therefrom, shall be and remain the property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon
their use or dissemination for any purpose by CITY. To the extent any such ownership rights are
determined to not have been transferred pursuant to the £oregning provision, then
CONTRACTOR hereby assigns all o£ said rights to thc CITY as the same arise, and without
further compensation.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR will act hereunder as an independent contractor. This Agreement shall
not and is not intended to constitute CONTRACTOR as an agent, servant, or employee of CITY
and shall not and is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture or
association between CITY and CONTRACTOR.
7. CONFIDENTIALITY
All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
CONTRACTOR or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and
shall not be disclosed by CONTRACTOR without prior written consent by CITY. CITY shall
grant such consent if disclosure is legally required. All CITY data shall be returned to CITY
upon the termination o£this Agreement. CONTRACTOR'S covenant under this section shall
survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CONTRACTOR hereby warrants for itself, its employees, and subcontractors that those
persons presently have no interest and shall not obtain any interest, direct or indirect, which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services contemplated by this
Agreement. No person having such conflicting interest shall be employed by or associated with
CONTRACTOR in connection with services to be performed hereunder. CONTRACTOR
hereby warrants for itself, its employees, and subcontractors that no such person shall engage in
any conduct which would constitute a conflict of interest under any CITY ordinance, state law or
federal statute.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
A. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold
harmless and defend CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims and losses, liabilities, costs and/or expenses for any damage due to death or injury
to any person and/or damage to any property or other loss of any nature resulting from any acts or
3
RC-agreement-crossing guards
omissions, including but not limited to, alleged intentional, reckless or negligent acts, errors or
omissions, of CONTRACTOR or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, or
subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include
reasonable attorneys-- fees and experts' costs incurred by the CITY using counsel of its choice.
B. CONTRACTOR'S obligations under this or any other provision of this
Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any workers compensation act or similar act.
CONTRACTOR expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to the
CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
C. CITY does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against
CONTRACTOR because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any insurance
policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and
indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are
determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense.
CONTRACTOR agrees that CONTRACTOR'S covenant under this section shall survive the
termination of this Agreement.
D. CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to
CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any and
all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against CITY by reason of the independent
contractor relationship created by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the
workers' compensation laws regarding CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR'S employees.
CONTRACTOR further agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any failure of
CONTRACTOR to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. CITY shall have the
right to offset against the amount of any fees due to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement any
amount due to CITY from CONTRACTOR as a result of CONTRACTOR'S failure to promptly
pay to CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.
10. INSURANCE
A. CONTRACTOR shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry,
maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:
1. Commemial General Liability Insurance with minimum limits of Two Million
Dollars ($2,000,000) for each occurrence and in the aggregate for any personal injury,
death, loss or damage.
2. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle
used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits of One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
4
RC-agreement-crossing guards
B. CONTRACTOR shall require each of its subcontractors to maintain insurance
coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement.
C. The policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in
the State of California and with a rating of at least A:VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance
Guide.
D. CONTRACTOR agrees that if it does not keep the insurance required in this
Agreement in full force and effect, CITY may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if
insurance is available at a reasonable cost, CITY may take out the necessary insurance and pay,
at CONTRACTOR'S expense, the premium thereon.
E. Prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall file
with CITY'S Risk Manager a certificate or certificates of insurance, together with endorsements,
showing that the insurance policies are in effect in the required amounts.
F. CONTRACTOR shall provide proof that policies of insurance expiring during the
term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the
same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the
coverages.
G. The general liability and automobile policies of insurance shall contain an
endorsement naming CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as
additional insureds. All of the policies shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies
cannot be canceled or reduced except on thirty (30) days' prior written notice to CITY.
CONTRACTOR agrees to require its insurer to modify the certificates of insurance to delete any
exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation
imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions.
H. The insurance provided by CONTRACTOR shall be primary to any other
coverage available to CITY. Any insurance or self-insurance maintaine, d by CITY, its officers,
employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of CONTRACTOR S insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
I. No insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall prohibit
CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR'S employees, agents or subcontractors, from waiving the
right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONTRACTOR hereby waives all rights of subrogation
against CITY.
J. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be approved by CITY. At the
option of CITY, CONTRACTOR shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured
retentions with respect to CITY, or CONTRACTOR shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment
5
RC-agreement-crossing guards
of losses and expenses, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CITY.
K. Procurement of insurance by CONTRACTOR shall not be construed as a
limitation of CONTRACTOR'S liability or as full performance of CONTRACTOR'S duties to
indemnify, hold harmless and defend under this Agreement.
11. MUTUAL COOPERATION
A. CITY shall provide CONTRACTOR with all pertinent data, documents and other
requested information as is reasonably available for the proper performance of
CONTRACTOR'S services.
B. In the event any claim or action is brought against CITY relating to
CONTRACTOR'S performance in connection with this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall
render any reasonable assistance that CITY may require.
12. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS
CONTRACTOR shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters
covered under this Agreement for a period of at least three (3) years. CITY shall have access,
without charge, during normal business hours to such records, and the right to examine and audit
the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents,
proceedings, and activities.
13. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for any reason or for no
reason on thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of such notice.
CONTRACTOR shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause.
B. In the event of termination or cancellation of this Agreement by CITY, due to no
fault or failure of performance by CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR shall be paid based on the
percentage of work satisfactorily performed at the time of termination. In no event shall
CONTRACTOR be entitled to receive more than the amount that would be paid to
CONTRACTOR for the full performance of the services required by this Agreement.
14. FORCE MAJEURE
CONTRACTOR shall not be liable for any failure to perform if CONTRACTOR presents
acceptable evidence, in CITY'S sole judgment, that such failure was due to causes beyond the
control, and without the fault or negligence, of CONTRACTOR.
6
RC-agreement-crossing guards
15. NOTICES
Any notices, bills, invoices, or r~orts required by this Agreement shall be deemed
received on: (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during
CONTRACTOR'S and CITY'S regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day
following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as set forth below, or to
such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing.
If to CITY: If to CONTRACTOR:
Attn: Jack Lam, City Manager Baron Farwell, General Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga All City Management Services
10500 Civic Center Drive 1749 S. La Cienega Boulevard
P.O. Box 807 Los Angeles, CA 90035-4601
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91720
16. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
In the performance of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any
employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or
sexual orientation or other basis prohibited by law. CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action
to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national
origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.
17. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT
CONTRACTOR shall not delegate, transfer, subcontract or assign its duties or rights
hereunder, either in whole or in part, without CITY'S prior written consent, and any attempt to
do so shall be void and of no effect. CITY shall not be obligated or liable under this Agreement
to any party other than CONTRACTOR.
18. ATTORNEY'S FEES
7
RC-agreement-crossing guards
In the event that CITY or CONTRACTOR commences any legal action or proceeding for
breach, or to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this
Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this
Agreement and provisions of any document incorporated by reference, the provisions of this
Agreement shall prevail. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between CITY and
CONTRACTOR with respect to the subject matter herein. No prior representation, promise or
other oral or written agreement not set forth herein shall be binding on the parties. Any
modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and executed by CITY and
CONTRACTOR.
20. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any litigation shall be the Superior Court of the County of San
Bemardino, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
21. SEVERABILITY
Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a
manner as to be valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement, is determined by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions
shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect.
22. CAPTIONS
The captions used in this Agreement are solely for reference and the convenience of the
parties. Said captions are not a part of the Agreement, in no way bind, limit, or describe the
scope or intent of any provision, and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation
of any provision herein.
8
RC-agreement-crossing guards
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga CONTRACTOR All City Management
Services
By:
Mayor
By:
9
RC-agreement-crossing guards
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. The Contractor will provide personnel equipped and trained in appropriate procedures for
crossing pedestrians in marked crosswalks. Such personnel shall be herein referred to as a
Crossing Guard. The Contractor is an independent Contractor and the Crossing Guards to be
furnished by it shall at all times be its employees and not those of the City.
2. The City shall have the right to determine the hours and locations when and where Crossing
Guards shall be furnished by the Contractor. The Contractor shall notify the City in writing
of any changes which may need to occur in hours of work or locations. The City further has
the power to add to, delete from, or revise the work schedule/locations at any time.
3. The Contractor shall provide supervisory personnel to see that Crossing Guard activities are
taking place at the required places and times, and in accordance with all items of this
Agreement.
4. The Contractor shall maintain adequate reserve personnel to be able to furnish alternate
Crossing Guards in the event that any person fails to report for work at the assigned time and
location.
5. The Contractor shall provide personnel properly trained as herein specified for the
performance of duties of Crossing Guards. In the performance of their duties the Contractor
and employees of the Contractor shall conduct themselves in accordance with the conditions
of this Agreement and the laws and codes of the State of California and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
6. The Contractor shall train, schedule, provide, and supervise personnel in accordance with
the contract and the rules and regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Crossing
Guards shall perform their duties as trained and within the City's rules for such guards.
7. Persons provided by the Contractor as Crossing Guards shall be trained in the laws and codes
of the State of California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga pertaining to general
pedestrian safety and school crossing areas.
8. Crossing Guard Services shall be provided by the Contractor at the designated locations and
at the designated hours on all days on which the designated schools in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, are in session.
9. The Contractor shall provide all Crossing Guards with apparel by which they are readily
visible and easily recognized as Crossing Guards. Such apparel shall be uniform for all
persons performing the duties of Crossing Guards and shall be worn at all times while
performing said duties. This apparel must be appropriate for weather conditions. The
Contractor shall also provide all Crossing Guards with hand held Stop signs and any other
safety equipment which may be necessary. Apparel and equipment shall be pre-approved by
the City Manager or the designee.
10
RC-agreement-crossing guards
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Alta Loma School District
Alta Loma Elementary School Amethyst & La Grande 2 hrs
Amethyst & Monte Vista 2 hfs
Hellman & La Grande 2 hrs
Alta Loma Jr. High 9000 Lemon/In front of school 2 hrs
Banyan Elementary School Mirador Dr & Chandon PI 2 hfs
Fredericksburg & Banyan 2 hrs
Lemon & Semillon 2 hfs
Carnelian Elementary School La Vine & Emerald 2 hrs
Deer Canyon Elementary School 19th & Cartilla 2 hrs
Mignonette & Hermosa 2 hrs
19th & Hermosa 2 hfs
Floyd Stork Elementary School Sapphire & Orchard 2 hrs
Jasper & Omhard 2 hrs
Hermosa Elementary School Wilson & Hermosa 2 hrs
Jasper Elementary School 19th & Jasper 2 hrs
18th 8~ Jasper 2 hfs
Victoria Groves Elementary School Emerson & Fairmont 2 hrs
Cucamonga School District
Rancho Cucamonga Middle School Hermosa & Feron 2.15 hrs
Cucan~onga Elementary School
Los Amigos Elementary School Baker & Salina 2 hfs
9th & Baker 2 hrs
11
RC-agreeraent-crossing guards
Central School District
Central Elementary School Archibald & Foothill 2.45 hrs
Archibald & Tryon 2.45 hrs
Coyote Canyon Elementary: Spruce & Terra Vista 2 hrs W
2.45 hrs
Ruth Musser Middle School: Hampton & Terra Vista 2.30 W- 3.15
(For both schools) Mtn View & Spruce 2.30 W- 3.15
Cucamonga Middle School Hellman & Church 2 hrs
Hellman & Palo Alto 2 hrs
Dona Merced Elementary School Hermosa & Church 3.15 hrs
Church & Center 2.30 hrs
Haven & Church 3.30
Etiwanda School District
Etiwanda Intermediate School Etiwanda & Victoria 2 hrs
Etiwanda S/of Victoria 2 hrs
Carleton Lightfoot Elementary School Lucera & Kenyon Wy 2.15 hrs W- 4
Victoria Pk & Kenyon Way 2.15 hrs W- 4
Caryn Elementary School Vintage & Sierra Crest Loop 2 hrs
Sierra Crest Loop & Mt Waverly 2 hrs
Rochester & Vintage (vacan0 2 hfs
Colony Elementary Banyan & Ashton 2 hrs W- 3 hrs
Grapeland Elementary School Etiwanda & Craig 2 hrs M- 3 hrs
Etiwanda & Baseline (vacant) 2 hrs M- 3 hrs
John L. Golden Elementary School Banyan & Bluegrass 2 hfs M - 3hfs
Banyan & Day Creek (vacant) 2 hrs M - 3hfs
Bluegrass & Wilson {proposed)
Terra Vista Elementary School Terra Vista / Mt View 2 hrs M - 3hrs
12
RC-agreement-crossing guards
Church & Terra Vista (proposed)
Windrows Elementary School Victoria Park & Victoria Windrows Loop 2 hfs
Peach & Bougainvillea 2 hfs
13
RC-agreement-crossing guards
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E, Perez, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF UPLAND AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STREET
IMPROVEMENTS ON GROVE AVENUE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF
UPLAND AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT
AND CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THERETO
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement, authorize the Mayor to sign the
agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSiS
This project will improve pavement and provide for four driving lanes and a two way left turn lane
from Arrow Route to the south City limit. The City of Upland has approached staff with the request
to include frontage improvements at the northwest corner of Bowen and Grove.
The City of Upland has executed an agreement and appropriated funds to reimburse Rancho
Cucamonga for the portion of construction within their City. The total project is currently estimated
at $446,000. The estimated amount of improvements within Upland is $28,000. In good faith
Upland has appropriated $35,000 for the construction reimbursement.
The project awards tonight and is expected to begin construction in mid September.
Respectfully submitted,
willia~ J. o Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MEP
Attachments: Vicinity Map
VICINITY MAP
GROVE AVENUE "STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FROM 8TH ST. TO ARROW RTE.
AND "'
SAN BERNARDINO RD. CROSS GUTTER
FROM GROVE AVE. TO APPROX. 100' E/O GROVE AVE.
i PROJECT
LOCATION
B~n
Route 30
19~ ~ ~land Ay
Base e Rd
Rt
Freeway
THE C I T Y O F
I~AN Cll 0 C U CAM 0 N GA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO LEASE PROPERTY AT 12158 BASE
LINE ROAD TO FACILITATE THE OPERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA'S HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM
BACKGROUND
The City Of Rancho Cucamonga's Household Hazardous Waste Facility has resided within the
confines of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Etiwanda Yard in conjunction with Fire
Station 173 since 1989. Fire Station 173 is relocating to their new facility on Day Creek Blvd in the
near future.
The District has requested that the HHW Facility vacate its' current site inside th~'existing fenced
area. The current HHW site occupies over 9,000 square feet of the fenced area and excluding the
entrance and exit of customers.
ANALYSIS
The Engineering Division/Integrated Waste/NPDES Section entered into negotiations with the
District to allow the HHW Facility to remain on the site that residents have become accustom to
since 1989. The District has agreed to allow the HHW Facility to remain so long as the operation is
move outside the fenced area.
A lease has been agreed upon by the City Of Rancho Cucamonga and the County Flood Control
District at a rate of $1,000.00 per year and the City may make improvements to the land between
the existing fence and Base Line Road.
Staff has begun developing conceptual designs for the site with improvements that will
accommodate the existing program and future program expansion.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Agreement with San Bernardino County Flood Control District-HHW Site
August 3, 2005
Page 2
RECOMMENDATIONS
Approval to enter into an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to lease
property at 12158 Base Line Road to facilitate the operation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's
Household Hazardous Waste Program.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DA]E: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY:
Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer ~v~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSION/~ SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SB&O,
INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $65,000 AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF
A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,500 TO PROVIDE FISCAL
YEAR 2005/2006 TOPOGRAPHICAL DESIGN SURVEY SERVICES FOR
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
WITHIN THE CITY, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL PROJECT
ACCOUNTS AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2005/2006 BUDGET, AND
APPROPRIATE $10,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11103035650/1533176-0
(CUCAMONGA CREEK BIKE TRAIL) FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUND
BALANCE.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with
SB&O, Inc., to provide fiscal year 2005/2006 topographical design survey services, for proposed
capital improvement projects at various locations within the City, and authorize the Mayor to
sign said agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Requests for proposals to provide design survey services for proposed capital improvement
projects at various locations within the City were sent to the four consulting firms that we
currently contract with for providing construction survey services. Three firms responded, and
after review and rating of the proposals, the proposal submitted from SB&O, Inc., was accepted
as meeting the best needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, and lowest
overall cost.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments
ONTAP--.IO CITY LIMIT
LEGEND
DESIGN SURVEY PROJECTS FY 2005/2006
VICINITY MAP
r~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffR ort
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Catron, Facilities Supervisor
S~: APPROVE A CONTRACT EXTENSION WITIt WSA SECURITY, INC. (CO 01-060) TO JUNE
30, 2006 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 ($120,000), 1133303-5304 ($120,000), 1700201-5304
($70,380), AND 1290606-5300 ($22,000) TO COVER MONTHLy SERVICE AND EXTRA WORK
FOR FISCAL YEAR 05-06
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract extension with WSA Security, Inc. (CO 01-060) to June 30,
2006 to be funded from 1001312-5304 ($120,000), 1133303-5304 ($120,000), 1700201-5304 ($70,380), and 1290606-
5300 ($22,000) to cover monthly service and extra work for Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On January 5, 2005, City Council approved a contract extension with WSA Security, Inc. to provide security services at
the Metrolink Station, Civic Center, Epicenter, Library and add Central Park to their scope of service. Th s contract is
up fo~- re-b~d, however, w~th the construchon of the Cultural Arts Center which is 91,000 sq. ft. and will require special
security considerations, staff recommends extending the contract with WSA Security, Inc., until June 2006 to maximize
our ability to start up the new building effectively. This current contract cycle will include the addition of the Cultural
Arts Center. Staff has received a letter from WSA Security, Inc. acknowledging their desire to continue this contract and
have requested a "cost of living" increase, which is the first rate increase they have requested since January 2002. City
staffrecommends that a rate increase of 4.2% be granted based on the May 2605 Consumer Price Index for Los Angeles-
Riverside-Orange County index as listed on the "Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average" as
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor and any additional scope of work be charged at
this adjusted hourly rate.
The City has received excellent response from this vendor and recommends a rate increase of 4.2% and extending their
contract to June 30, 2006.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi, La'm .~. O'Neil
City'Engineer
WJO:DC:dlw
July 13, 2005
Mr. Gregory R. Riggin
Vice President & General Manager
WSA US Guards, Co., Inc.
10311 S. LaCienega Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Dear Mr. Riggin:
SUBJECT: Contract Extension for Security Guard Services (CO 01-060)
I am in receipt of your intent to continue security guard services for the city of Rancho Cucamonga
through June 30, 2006. In your letter, you have requested a "cost of living" increase. Based upon the
length of the original contract and last year's extension of this contract for an additional year at no
additional rate increase, the city proposes a rate increase of 4.2% which is based on the May 2005
Consumer Price Index for Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County index as listed on the "Consumer Price
Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average" as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor.
I have enclosed 3 sets of contract extension documents that will need to be signed and returned to me for
approval by our City Council. A fully executed document will be returned to you for your files.
We look forward to continue working with you in meeting the city's security service needs. Please give
me a call at (909) 477-2730, ext. 4090 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Dale B. Catron
City Facilities Superintendent
cc: William J. O~Neil, City Engineer
Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Contract flies
Enclosure: Contract Extension Document
Contract Extension
with
WSA Security, Inc.
for project titled:
"Security Guard Services at Various Locations City-Wide"
(CO-01-060)
This contract extension will serve to confirm the extension of Contract Number 01-060 to June 30, 2006. This contract shall run from the
effective date of the Contract through June 30, 2006, and may be extended on a year-to-year basis, up to a maximum of two additional one-
year periods beginning July 1, 2006 by mutual written agreement of the City Engineer and the Contractor, provided that any extension shall
be on the terms and conditions stated herein. The Contractor may request, by submission ora written request at least 30 days prior to the
contract extension date, and the City Engineer may approve a cost-of-living increase based upon the May index of the current year for the Los
Angeles-Riverside-Orange County index as listed on the "Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average" as published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Such cost-of-living factor shall be applied to all hourly rates and fees identified in the
contract and the resultant product shall be added to the existing fee. The new sum, produced by adding the cost-of-living amount and the base
fee, shall become the new fee that will remain in effect for the remainder of the term of the Contract. Any additions to this contract will be
billed at the current rates. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement remain intact.
Annual Estimated Billing for FY 2005-2006
~includes 4.2% CPI!
Regular Regular Regular Overtime Overtime Overtime Holiday Holiday Holiday Annual
Location Hours Bill RateSub Total Hours Bill Rate Sub Total Hours Bill RateSub Total Totals
City Hall 2,412 $11.98 $28,896 0 $17.97 $0 84 $17.97 $1,509 $30,40:,
Central Park 4,686 $11.98 $56,138 $17.97 $£ 9E $17.97 $1,761 $57,8~';
Epicenter/Si)ods Complex 2,856 $11.98 $34,215 $17.97 $£ 5E $17.97 $1,006 $35,221
Library(Archibald) 1,534 $11.98 $18,37~ (;$17.97 SC C $17.97 $0 $18,3/~
Vletrolink 5,809 $11.98 $69,59; 39¢ $17.97 $7,008 119 $17.97 $2,13~ $78,73-
Totals 17,297 $11.98 $207,21~ 390 $17.97 $7,008 357 $17.97 $6,41,~ $220,64;
Approved by the City Council on August 3rd, 2005.
CONTRACTOR: CITY:
WSA Security, Inc. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
By:
Contractor
· ~ By: BY:
"~ Title Date William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
R A C H O C U CA M O N GA
I~ N Gl N E E R I N G D E PA R TItlE N T
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE VICTORIA ARBORS PARK IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT FROM STANDARD PACIFIC/VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC, AS
COMPLETE, AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION,
AND RECORD THE GRANT DEED FOR THE PROPERTY.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept, as complete, the Victoria Arbors Park Improvement Project, located
at 7429 Arbor Lane, on the northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Long Meadow Drive; authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and record the Grant Deed for the property submitted
by Standard Pacific/Victoria Arbors, LLC.
BACKGROUND
The 8 acre Victoria Arbors Park Improvement Project, located at 7429 Arbor Lane (see attached
map), has been completed by Standard Pacific/Victoria Arbors, LLC, in accordance with the
Development Agreement for the Victoria Arbors Project dated March 7, 2001, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer. It is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the park improvement
project from Standard Pacific/victoria Arbors, LLC as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file
a Notice of Completion for the work, and record the grant deed for the property~
Resp?cff,~lly su.b. mitted,
Williar, h J. O'Neil
City Engineer
attachment
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENCINE£I~INC DE PAi~TlVl E NT
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE VICTORIA ARBORS PARK IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT FROM STANDARD PACIFIC/VICTORIA ARBORS, LLC, AS
COMPLETE, AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION,
RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT THE
MAINTENANCE BOND, AND RECORD THE GRANT DEED FOR THE
PROPERTY.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept, as complete, the Victoria Arbors Park Improvement Project, located
at 7429 Arbor Lane, on the northeast comer of Arbor Lane and Long Meadow Drive; authorize the
City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and record the Grant Deed for the property submitted
by Standard Pacific/Victoria Arbors, LLC; and, authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND
The 8 acre Victoda Arbors Park Improvement Project, located at 7429 Arbor Lane (see attached
map), has been completed by Standard Pacific2Victoda Arbors, LLC, in accordance with the
Development Agreement for the Victoria Arbors Project dated March 7, 2001, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer. It is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the park improvement
project from Standard PacificNictoda Arbors, LLC as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file
a Notice of Completion for the work, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and record the grant deed for the property.
Respectfully submitted, .
,!li~ J. 0 Nell
Cit~7 Engineer
attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR VICTORIA ARBORS PARK, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Victoria Arbors
Park Project, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, TI-tRREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino.
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT
StaffR ort
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil,. City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. PRF8699474 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $285,166.00, FOR THE CARNELIAN STREET STORM DRAIN
AND STREET REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS FROM VIVERO STREET
TO 19TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-058
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the' City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. PRF8699474 in the amount of $285,166.00 for the Carnelian Street Storm
Drain and Street Rehabilitation Improvements from Vivero Street to 19th Street, Contract No. 03-
058.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI,~
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street and storm drain
improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc.
8737 Helms Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachments
'77
ONTA~O CI~ LIMIT
P~OJECT ' '
LOCATION
MM~: ~0 ~ TO 19~
~ ~~08 ~0~
~CINI~ ~ ,
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2005/2010
MEASURE "1" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND
TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR
2005/06 AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE "1" FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local
Measure "1" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan
as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure
"1" Funds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Measure 'T', the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local
jurisdiction receiving revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which
those funds shall be expended.
Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan schedule to be
adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments
for informational purposes. The Five-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for
spillage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "1"
expenditures. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at
each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Five Year Capitallmprovement Program/Twenty Year Transpodation Plan
August3,2005
Page 2
SANBAG has advised us the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan for Local Measure "l" Funds
can be a list of projects for a 20-year period or narrative policy statement estimating the
types of projects Local Measure "1" Funds are to be used for, and the percentage of funds
allocated for each type of project. Since it is difficult to list actual projects 20 years in
advance, Staff recommends Council approve the policy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. ~'-43.'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
2005/2010 MEASURE "1" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TVVENTY-YEAR
TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR
2004/05 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE '1" FUNDS
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "1" in
November, 1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent
retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated
territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be usebl for transportation
improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans
set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of Authority; and
WHEREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction
receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of
the local jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local
jurisdiction annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure "l" Five-Year
Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which
is attached to this resolution.
~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2005/10
~ YEAR ISTREET &_~___~LIMITS
05/06 J IMPROVEMENT Cost Estimate
~ Corrective Measures - Cit)~ Wide ~n ramps and drivewa~ modificat~ $ 100,00~
I 'Archibald Av - 19th St to Banyan St IPavement ~it~
---- $ 300,000
2 Archibald Av - Base Line to 19th St I Pavement Rehabilitation $ 385,00~
3 _ ~ Arrow Rte - Archibald to Hermosa Pavement Rehabilitation $
4 I Arrow Rte - at Etiwanda Traffic Signal Modification 2,000
5 _ -- Arrow Rte- W/O Etiwanda to ECL Pavement Rehabilitation $ 100,000
6~ ~ Banyan St - Sapphire to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation $ 10,00~
~7 _ ~ Bas~ee Line Rd - Carnelian St to Lion $ 10,000
-- Pavement Rehabilitation $ 290,000
8 , Base Line Rd - Haven~ to Dee~rk Channel - Pavement Rehabilitation
9 _ Base Line Rd - Ramona to Hermosa IPavement Rehabilitation and Storm Drain $ 266,000
10 ~ Base Line Rd - West City Limits to Carnelian ~Pavement Rehabilitation -- $ 2,000
11 ~ Bell St - Cielito to 19th Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,0~
~ $ 95,o0~o
12 Church St - Archibald Av to Hermosa Av Pavement Rehabilitation $ 300,000
Contract Services Concrete Maintenance $ 500,00u
13 Grove Av - 8th St to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 86,000
14 Hellman Av - W/O Hellman Av t° Ameth~t S~ Pavement Rehabilitati°n' Widening' and St°~m~Jn $ 2,144,000
15 Hermosa Ay - Highland to Banyan Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 2,000
16 __ Hermosa Ay - N/O-Base Line to N/O RXR Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening $ 2,000-
___~ Lo~_~l Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation $ 1,002,000
,,Pavement Management Evaluate Pavement Condition $ 97,00~00
17 __ Sa~hire St - 19th St to Bany~an St T~avement Rehabilitation $ 2,000
06/07 FY 05/06 Total $ 5,995,00~
~ ADA Correctiv~e Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modiflcation~ss $ 100,00o
1~88 __ Archibald Ay - Ban an St to Hiliside Rd Pavement Rehabilitation
19 Arrow Rte - Hermosa ~~ Pavement Rehabilitation
2~ I -- ~ ~ $ 300,000
Arrow Rte - W/O Etiwanda to ECL ~ $ 250,000
Pavement Rehabilitation
_$ o,ooo
Local Streets- Cit?Wd~ ~ _$ 450~
r
Y 06~07 Total $ 2,300,00~
Page 1 of 2
7/26/2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE FIVE YEAR PLAN 2005/10
STREET & LIMITS ~ENT Cost'-'~"-'~stimate
ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and drivewa~ modifications $ 100,000
23 nelian to Be~ Pavement Reha~bi~i~ation $ 200~
24 Haven Av - 4th St to 7th St Pavement Rehabilitation ~$$ 300,00~0
25 Hermosa Av - Foothill to Effen Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 450,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation I $ 800,00~0
26 Wilson Av - Archibald to Haven Street widenin~g an~d pavement rehabilitation $ 400,000
FY 07/08 Tota~l $ 2,250,0~
ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications 100,000
27 Haven Ay - Jersey Blvd to Foothill Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation 300,00~-
28 Hillside Rd - Carnelian to B~_I Pavement Rehabilitation 250,000
Local Streets - City Wide - Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800~
29 Terra Vista Prkwy~- Spruce to Milliken Pavement Rehabilitation $ 200,000
30 th to--Foothill Pavement Rehabilitation $- 550,00~-
-- FY 08/09 Tota_l $ 2,200,00-~-
~ Corrective Measures - City Wide -- Intersection ramps and driveway modifications -- $- 100,000
31 I I Ban_y_~ Beryl to Archibald' Pavement Rehabilitation
32 J IHill.~i~ Rd - Beryl to Archibald $ 400,000
Pavement Rehabilitation $ 35010~
Local Streets - City Wide -- Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800,00~-
33 Milliken Av - 7th to Arrow Pavement Rehabilitation $ 600~
FY 09/10 Total $ 2,250,000
I Five Year Tota~ 14,995~
Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Yrs.) from SANBAG $ 12,716,000
Rancho Cucamonga Measure I Fund Balanc~ $ 4,501
Total Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Yrs.~ $ 17,217,~
Contact: Je~ Senior Civil ~ 477-2740 Ext, 4037
Page 2 of 2 7/26/2005
UPLAND
FONTANA
I
LEGEND:
MEASURE I
.,,,~ FIVE YEAR PLAN
o~ ONTARIO (~oo5 ?o ~,o~o)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EXPENDITURE STRATEGY
2005/06
The City intends to expend its Measure I funds generally as shown on our 20 year plan
(attached). However, at present, we show funds being expended in FY 2005/2006 for
one large project, the Hellman Avenue storm drain and widening from west of Hellman
Avenue to Amethyst Street ($2,144,000). These funds could be reallocated in any given
year depending upon a change in priorities.
Including the projects budgeted for FY 2005/06 and projects encumbered during FY
2004/05; the City is projecting a Measure I fund balance of $1,253,000 at the close of FY
2005/06. These funds will be budgeted in FY 2006/07.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
20 YEAR LOCAL MEASURE I TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The 20 Year Local Measure I Transportation Plan for the expenditure of Measure I funds
will use the City's General Plan Cimulation Element as a basis (copy attached). It is
anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the following manner:
Percent Type of Improvement
30 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of Existing Roadways
10 Traffic Signal Improvements
20 Street Widening
10 Intersection Improvements
10 Railroad Crossing Improvements
20 Slurry and Chip Seal of Existing Streets
CONSTRUCTION OF VICTORIA ARBORS
PARK
Victoria
Lane, ju~
The 8 acre park site was devetopea Pl cific
Homes as oart of the Victoria Arb, at Community.
Construction of the park ~ ember 2004
And proceeded o uite ~e course of
approx mately 8 months, Construction included
the foltovv~ng ~
A Group Picnic Shelter with
barbecues and seating for 30
A 60 FOot Ballfield
Exercise Equipment
7
Accessible Play Area fo
Children Ages 1 - :[2
A Full Basketball Court
And large areas of turfed open
space
GRAND OPEN NG
G~-an4 Opening an4
i
~o~
7z~29 A~bot Lane
Cross Streets are Aibor Lan & Churct~ St.
Saturday, Ausust 13t~' 10:O0 a.m, I:00 p,m,
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CUCANONGA
Stllff Report
DATE: August 3, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS REPEALING COUNCIL ACTIONS IN
REFERENCE TO THE ETIWANDA CREEK PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT, CASE NO. RVC 081807.
BACKGROUND: This request has been placed before the City Council at the request of the
City Attorney (Exhibit A). An adverse CEQA ruling by the Superior Court, Case No.
RCV 081807, requires the referenced actions, attached hereto for reference.
ANALYSIS: The Court required actions will not have a material effect on the previous
annexation of approximately 300 acres into the City completed in April 2005, but will revert the
land use changes from Low Density (2-4 Dwelling Units per Gross Acre) and Resource
Conservation to Very Low Density (.01-2 Dwelling Units per Gross Acre) to the General Plan
and Etiwanda North Specific Plan for the area north of Wilson Avenue and between East
Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road.
City Planner
BB:LH\ma
Attachments: Exhibit A - Letter from James L. Markman to Debra J. Clark dated July 19, 2005
Exhibit B - Copy of Superior Court Judgment for Case No. RCV 081807 dated
June 20, 2005
Resolution of Repeal of City Council Resolutions Nos. 04-211 and 04-212
Ordinance of Repeal of City Council Ordinance No. 728
?'7
I|,li,' J RICHARDS j WATSON J GERSHON
~[~ ^TTORN£YS AT LAW-A PROF[SSIONAL CORPORATION
1 Civic Center Circle, P.O. Box ~o59, Brea, California 92822-~o59
Telephone7~4.99o.ogol FacsimJle714.99o.623o~ ~ ~ ~~
~oo,~. ,,~,,,,~,~, City of R~cho Cucmonga
~'~"~ ~' '"~ 10500 Civic Center Dhve
~o~. [~, P.O. Box 807
~o~ ~.~t~o~ R~cho Cucmmonga, Califo~a 91729-0807
'~' ~. ~'* Re: Ordin~ce ~d Resolutions Repealing Co~cil Actions in Reference to
~,c.~,~o, Etiw~da Creek Project
~ o. ~ De~ Debbie:
,- ,~-,,~,~ As I believe you ~e aw~e, ~e lawsuit involving the Etiw~da Creek ma~er, ~
,~ ~o~ whch the City received ~ adverse decision, ~ well ~ o~er suits, were finally
~,~ ~. ~o~ sealed. The resulting co~ order req~res ~e Ci~ Co~cil to repeal ~e actions it
~,~,,~ ,. ~,,, took on ~e Etiw~da Creek project, ~clu~g Ordin~ce No. 728 ~d Resolution
'~'~'~. ~'~' Nos. 04-211 ~d 04-212. T~s ~1 must be ~ly accomp~sh~ before ~e end of
· ,~.o.~o Accor~ngly, I ~ provi~ng to you here~ a Co~cil resolution ~d ore,ce
~"'. ~"~ w~ch ~11 repeal ~ose prior actions. Plebe place ~ese items on ~e Ci~ Co~cil
~a~'~' ~ agenda for its meet~g of Au~st 3 M~ second read~g of~e ord~ce scheduled
,~,~,,~ ~ ,o,~ofor Au~st 17. ~s will accomplish the r~eals ~ ~e ~e ~orded by ~e Co~.
,o~ ,~,,~[ Plebe c~l if you have ~y questions.
· ~ ...... '"~ Ve~ ~ly yo~s,
~,m~ ~. ~, Ci~ A~omey
~o, ~,~ o~,,, Ci~ of R~cho Cucmonga
Enclos~e(s)
RICHARDS j WATSON J GERSHON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Debra J. Adams
July 19, 2005
Page 2
cc: Brad Buller (Encl.)
Mitch Abbott (Encl.)
l1231-0001\830822vl.doc
,Jul O1 2005 12:14PH C~'~lg R. Sherman, EseI. 611~0292S1 p.~
I 3~ES L. ~~ (State B~ No. 43536)GO~
CITY A~O~Y
2 CI~ OF ~CHO CUC~ONGA
3 ~C~S, WATSON & GE~HON
A Professio~ Co~oration 8~i L E D
4 ~C~LL E, ~OTT (State B~ No. 64990) ¢Ou n~on
G~A L. GIO~CO ~S~ate B~ No. 227140) ~ ~r 8~n
5 355 South ~dAvcnuc, 40 Floor
~s ~gcles, California 90071-3101 JUN ~ 0
6 Telephone: (213) 626-8484
Facs]~le: (213) 626-0078
8 A~omeys for Respondent,
C~ of Rancho C~a~nga
10 S~E~OR CO~T OF T~ STATE OF C~I~O~A
11 CO~ OF S~ BE~A~O
1 ~ SPI~T OF ~E SAGE CO~CIL, a Case No. RCV 081807
non-profit associatio~
~ CEQA
Petitioner,
c~ ov ~c~o cuc~o~a~, a U~n~: ~y u, 200s
17 public 9n~l ~d ~ES ONE ~ough T~e: 8:30 a.~
18 ~, m~lffs~ve Dept.: R-20
R~dents. ~gn Shana S. Sa~
19 ~uage of ~e Superior Cedi
20 S~ BE~~O CO~TY Action Filed: J~y 15, 2004
FLeD CO~OL. DIST~CT; A&J
2~ ~SO~CES, ~C. ~d DOES S~
22 ~ough F~ ~D, ~clusive,
Re~ P~es ~'~te~st.
23
24 "
25
26
27
Facsimile Received on 7/1/2005 1:32:46 PM
O1 2005 12:147M C~g R. Sherman, Esq. 6197029291~
I The petition for writ of mandate came on regularly for hearing pursuant to
2 order of the court on May 12, 2005 in DePartment R-20 of the above-entitled
3 court, Honorable Shahla S. Sabet, Judge presiding. Petitioner, Spirit &the Sage
4 Council, appeared through its attorneys of record, the Law Office of Craig A.
5 Sherman, by Craig A. Sherman. Respondent, City of Rancho Cucamonga,
6 appeared through its attorneys of record, Richards, Watson & Gershon, a
7 Professional Corporation, by Mitchell E. Abbott and Ginetta L. Giovinco. Real
8 party in interest San Bemardino County Flood Control District appeared through
9 its attorneys of record, the Office of County Counsel, by Charles Scholastico,
10 Deputy County Counsel. The court having received in evidence the 19-volume
11 Certified Administrative Record and having considered the briefs submitted by the
12' parties, and having heard and considered the'argument of counsel, and being fully
13 advised in the premises, now therefore,
14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
lS petition for writ of mandate be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and a peremptory
16 writ of mandate shall issue under seal o£this court ordering, compelling and
17 mandating as £ollows:
18 1. That respondont, City of Rancho Cucamonga, forthwith vacate and
19 annul City of Rancho Cucamonga Resolution No. 04-211,' City of Roncho
2o Cucamonga Resolution No. 04-212, and City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance
21 No. 728.
22 2. That respondont, City of Rancho Cucamonga, take no steps toward
23 adoption of the substance of Re~olution No. 04-211, Resolution No. 04-212 or
24 Ordinance No. 728 unless and until an Environmontal Impact'Report has first beon
25 prepared.
26 3. That respondent, City of Rancho Cueamonga file and serve a return to
27 the peremptory writ of mandate within 60 days after the writ is serVed
28 demonstrating its compliance with the tem~ oft. he peremptory writ.
-1-
Judgment
112~D0138~221~1-~
Facsimile Received on 7/1/2005 1:32:46 PM
01 2005 12:1~PH C~; FI. Sherman~ E~q. 61~?02~32910 P'~
1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that,
2 pursuant to Government Code Section 56375(e), no subsequent change may be
3 made to the general plan for the annexed territory or zoning for a period of two
4 yeoxs after the completion of the annexation, except as provided by law.
5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED~ ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
6 court retains jurisdiction to make such further order as may be necessary to ensure
7 compliance with this judgment.
8 IT IS FURTHIgR ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
9 petitioner shall be entitled to recover from respondent its costs of suit, pursuant to
10 Code of Civil Procedure Section 1032, and its attorney's fees, in an amount to be
11 fixed by the Court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5.
12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
13 petitioner shall take nothing by its petition against real party in interest, San
14 Bemardino County Flood Control District.
15 The Clerk is directed to enter this judgment.
16 Dated: June ~0. 2005.
18
~bama ~. ~abet
1~ Judge of the Superior Court
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
1123BO138L322131,5
Facsimile Received on 7/1/2005 1:32:46 PM
01 2005 12:lSPM C~g A. Sherman, Esq. G1~029281 p.5
I APPROVED AS TO FORlVl AND CONTENT:
2 LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG A. SHERMAN
4 By:
Craig A. Sherman
5 Attorney for Petitioner,
Spirit of the Sage Council
6
7 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
A Professional Co~orafion
8 MITCHELL E. ABtlOTT
GINETTA L. GIOVINCO
10 By:
Mitchell ii. Ab'6ott '
I I A_ttomeys for Respondent,
City of Rancho Cftcamononga
13
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
iud*meat
11231'O138~t2213 I.~
Facsimile Received on 7/1/2005 1:32:46 PM
RESOLUT,ON NO. Z$ 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS RESOLUTIONS NOS.
04-211 AND 04-212.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Resolution Nos. 04-211 and 04-212 of this Council hereby are repealed.
2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2005
Mayor
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of
August 2005, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting on the City Council of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of August 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
A ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ITS ORDINANCE NO. 728.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 728 of this Council hereby are repealed.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall cedify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2005
Mayor
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of
August 2005, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting on the City Council of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of August 2005, by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAINED: COUNClLMEMBERS
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive 9. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
AGENDAS
· Redevelopment Agency
· Fire Protection District
· City Council
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays 9- 7:00 p.m.
JULY 20, 2005
AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern
Rex Gufierrez ............................ Member
L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member
Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
4:00 p.m. Special Closed Session .................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting .. Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ............ Council Chambers
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
~l~CHO
TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIl
The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length
of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief, if others have already expressed your position, you may simply
indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your
entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping,
booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk
behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally
limited to 5 minutes per individual.
!f you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There
~s opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution.
To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your
name for the record and speak into the microphone.
All items to be placed on a City Couhcil Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00
p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIAL ,~
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the
Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are
rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has
added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
~.u, cam,onga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandw dth (DSL/C~ble Modem) or Low bandwidth (Dial u
~nternerservice. ' ' ' P)
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucarnonga.ca, us
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M.
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ]
c[~CHO HALL, f 0500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
II A. CALLTO O ,ER I
1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __,
Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONSI
1. Presentation in recognition of County Supervisor Paul Biane for his
ongoing commitment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Presentation of a Proclamation to SCAG in recognition of 40 years of
dedicated service to the Southern California Region.
3. Presentation of a Proclamation to Children's Network for their "Fun in
the Sun, Safe Summer."
4. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to donors and sponsors of
the "Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo."
5. Announcement by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Team in
Training Program.
[I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS [
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
I[o. CONSENT CALENDARI
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: June 2, 2005 (special meeting)
June 9, 2005 (special meeting)
June 15, 2005 (Spagnolo absent)
June 16, 2005 (special meeting-
Spagnolo absent)
July 6, 2005 (special meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/30/05 through 7/12/05 and 1
Payroll ending 7/12/05 for the total amount of $2,223,479.66.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 2
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
,..,]:~u~NCHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
3. Approval of a request from American Youth Soccer Organization 15
(AYSO) Region 65 for a Waiver of Fees and Charges for use of the
soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Adult Sports
Complex on September 1 O, 2005, for their picture day.
4. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services 17
Update.
5. Approval of a payment in the amount of $4,315,000 to the County of
San Bernardino Flood Control District that will serve to transfer the 31
Regional Mainline Drainage Fees collected by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, as provided for in Agreement No. CO 02-139 to meet the
City's funding obligation for the Upper Etiwanda Creek Improvement
Project, and approval of an appropriation of $4,315,000 to Account
No. 11143035650/1358-0 from the Drainage Etiwanda/San Sevaine
(Fund 114) fund balance.
6. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for removal and replacement of 33
Grand Prix Fire damaged fencing located along the Skyline, Monroe
Canyon, David and Hermosa Easement Community Equestrian Trails.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-223 34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF GRAND PRIX FIRE
DAMAGED FENCING LOCATED ALONG THE
SKYLINE, MONROE CANYON, DAVIS AND
HERMOSA EASEMENT COMMUNITY
EQUESTRIAN TRAILS AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
7. Approval to accept the Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street 35
Improvements (CO No. 03-128) as Complete, approval to appropriate
$22,000.03 to Account No. 11243035650/1283124-0 from
Transportation Fund Balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond
as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond and authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final
contract amount Of $496,330.03.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-224 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE
ROAD AT THE 1-15 TRAFFIC AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 03-128
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 3
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
cRANcHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
6. Approval to accept the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and 39
Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to Banyan Street,
(CO No. 05-011) as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond
as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve
the final contract amount of $243,288.70.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-225
41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERMOSA
AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HIGHLAND AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 05-011 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
9. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 6205444 in 43
the amount of $36,674.00, for the Modification of Traffic Signals and
Safety Lighting at Archibald Avenue and 19t~ Street, Contract No. 03-
067.
10. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. SU 500-6064 45
in the amount of $78,868.00, for the Highland Avenue Landscape
Improvements East of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-019.
11. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 92929
9798 in the amount of $15,985.52, for the 2003/2004 Local Street 47
Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract
No. 03-068.
12. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 49
16334, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the
Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way submitted by Richmond
American Homes of California, Inc.
13. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 51
14496, located north of Wilson Avenue on the west side of Day Creek
Boulevard submitted by Granite Homes.
14. Approval of a Contract Amendment and additional appropriation for
RJM Design Group in the amount of $152,575 into account number 53
11203055300, purchase order number 46655 and for Dan Guerra and
Associates in the amount of $59,755 into account number
11203055650/1343120-0, purchase order number 47724 to be funded
from Fund 120 Fund Balance due to contractor related delays and
additional work required for the Central Park Senior/Community
Center Project. Delay related costs will be recovered from the project
contractor.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 4
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
cl~cHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
15. Approval and authorization to execute a Professional Services 55
Agreement with Butsko Utility Design, Inc., (CO 05-072) for electrical
system planning and continued mechanical electrical engineering
support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Service Area
to be funded from 17053035309.
16. Approval of an Agreement between the County of San Bernardino 57
(CO 05-073) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reimburse the
City for erosion control measures north of the Barret Basin,
appropriate $45,782 from General Fund to Account No.
10013075650/1501001-0 and authorize the additional award to Grand
Pacific Contractors, Contract 05-009, in the amount of $45,782.
17. Approval of Map, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the 60
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 16565, located on
the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Victoria Street, submitted
by Vernon Morrison.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-226 60-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
16565, AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 05-227 60-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 16565
18. Approval of a Map, Parcel Map 16714, located at the terminus of 61
Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Drive, submitted by Cecil
R. Carney and Cathy A. Carney, and Shueri I. Yaghi.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-228 64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
16714
~9. Approval of the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 3B and Street Lighting maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, and 6 for 65
Tract 16648, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and
the 210 Freeway Eastbound On-Ramp Submitted by Aim All Storage
210, LLC.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 5
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
CRANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
UCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 05-229 68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, AND 6 FOR TRACT MAP
NO. 16648
20. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Cash
Deposit for public street improvements and Development Review 81
Project DRC2002-1023, located on the southwest corner of Arrow
Route and White Oak Avenue, submitted by Stor-N-Lock Partners
#18, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-230 82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT
DRC2002-01023
83
21. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security Cash
Deposit, for public street improvement, and Ordering the Annexation
to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review Project
DRC2002-00864, located on the west side of White Oak Avenue north
of Elm Avenue, submitted by AIlyn B. Scheu and The L. & J. Scheu
Living Trust.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-231 84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DR2002-
00864
RESOLUTION NO. 05-232 85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT DRC2002-00864
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 6
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
i~ITEAMONGAI~'~NCHO HALL, t 0500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE J
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES Ii
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
DISTRIGT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107 - RANCHL~
CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change
the zoning designation from General Commercial to park for 3.36
acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between
Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use
designation from General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5.54 acres of land,
located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of
Madrone Avenue - APN: 0207-262-18 (podion of) and 27. Related
files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and
Development Review DRC2005-00220. Staff has prepared a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
94
ORDINANCE NO. 745 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING
DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL
COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 3.36 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
MADRONE AVENUE, BET~NEEN /
SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD
DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
(SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-
14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.54
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF 9TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600
FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 0207-262-18 (PORTION OF) AND 27
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 7
THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CUCaMONm
[I F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGSI1
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE 98
AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030 use
regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV
parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related files: Conditional Use
Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704.
Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 746 (first reading) 232
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A
REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.030
USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC
STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING
OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY
CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO 98
CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration
of a memorandum of Understanding for the use of Southern
California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some
commercial/industrial uses in selected areas as allowed by the
General Plan.
II u. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF 'BNO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES 236
AGREEMENTS (JCFA) WITH THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRIC~
(CO 05-074, AND CO 05-075). Request from the Et/wands School
District that the City of Rancho Cucamonga enter into two separate Joint
Community Facilities Agreements with the Etiwanda School District and
the owners of certain property located within the City pertaining to the
financing of public facilities, including facilities to be owned by the City,
through the Pinehurst Public Facilities Community Facilities District No.
1 proposed to be formed by the Et/wands School District.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 20, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. 8
THE MEETING TO BE HELD In THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
RANCHO HALL, '10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
2. REPORT ON STATUS OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION 237
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three
minutes per Councilmember.)
2. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES 243
SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDIN~
APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD
DIRECTORS
J. ADJOURNMENT I
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on July 14, 2005, seventy-two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
June 2, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
F~RE PROTECTION DISTRICT M~NUTES
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetin¢~
A.
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City
Council was held on Thursday, June 2, 2005, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center located at
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/President/Mayor William J.
Alexander called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m.
Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam
Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I; Trang Huynh,
Building Official; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara
Layne, Finance Officer; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst;
Helen Leeds, Sr. Accountant; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation
Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Karen Silhanek, Community Services
Technician; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Manager; Michelle Perera,
Reference Services Coordinator; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter
Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst I~1; and
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No communication was made from the public.
C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS
C1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the budget document, including the budget summary, has been
presented to the Agencymembers, Fire Boardmembers and the City Council. He stated this also includes
his budget message, which is part of the budget package.
A power point presentation (on file in the City Clerk's Office) was presented by Mr. Lam, which explained
the budget that was presented to the Council.
Jack Lam, City Manager, added the budget is balanced.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 2, 2005
Page 2
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander stated it has previously been discussed to enhance public safety
services, but did not feel there has been enough done in this area. He stated the City is losing key
people and that we cannot continue to over work them. He felt we have failed to look for alternate
sources of income. He felt we need new fire stations and felt this could be done through the development
community or possibly beginning a utility tax, which could provide revenue for this need. He did not think
we could expect anything from the State and did not agree that they gave themselves an increase. He
stated he knows we need the Fire Administrative Building, but felt a new station is more important. He
also felt we need to continue to work with the schools.
AgencymembeflBoardmember/Councilmember Michael asked about the backfilling of police positions
and other new positions that would be added.
Jack Lam, City Manager, reported to him what was in the budget.
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Michael confirmed that there would be six paramedic
positions added through this budget.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there are three this year and six next year.
Chief Bryan also commented on the staffing that would be added and the service this would provide.
Chairman/PresidentJMayor Alexander asked where the defibrillators would be located.
Chief Bryan informed him where these would be located.
AgencymembedBoardmember/Councilmember Michael stated he does not disagree about going to the
voters for funding for more public service. He felt if a tax was approved it could always be taken down to
zero once it was not needed anymore.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the problem with new facilities is the operating costs once they are built.
He stated cost recovery programs can help generate revenue, which the City is in the process of doing.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael felt maybe this Council needs to look for a
funding mechanism for future programs. He stated he is glad to see some of the positions backfilled in
Planning. He stated he is glad about the things going on in the Community Services Department, and
added he would like to meet with Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, to talk about a possible
survey for services for the community.
AgencymenmbeflBoardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked when the strategic fire plan will be
presented.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he is not sure when it'will be done, but in the near future.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the strategic plan would include things
that are not in the budget.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it will raise some policy questions, which will need to be addressed by
the Council. He stated all the staff can do is present to the Council what's in the current budget.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked if public safety services are the same
throughout the City.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it has always been that new development should pay its own way
through the developer. He stated this will be a policy decision the Council will need to address.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 2, 2005
Page 3
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Gutierrez asked about the quick response squad that
could be implemented in the northwest podion of the City. He stated he felt one was needed in the
parking lot of a senior complex and felt they would pay for it. He felt the City needed to use its
imagination with this. He stated he is proud of the budget that was presented and everyone's work.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Spagnolo stated Councilmember Gutierrez has a lot of
good ideas, but felt it should be left up to the Fire Chief where the quick response squad should go. He
stated he would like to know how much the Fire Chief needs to implement some of the safety programs,
ie., DARE, CPR, etc. He felt we are moving in the right direction with the squad and response times, but
wished we could do this much quicker. He stated we need to keep moving to get more protection in the
northwest portion of the City. He still felt senior transportation is needed, but didn't see it in the budget.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated the YMCA has said they will continue funding the
existing program at least for another six months. He stated the University of LaVerne is going to help with
an analysis for these transportation needs. He stated the City will be looking for funding sources over the
next several months.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Spagnolo stated there are so many staff leaving the City
and felt this needed to be addressed. He stated he is concerned about this.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated some staff are leaving because of moving up in their career path. He
stated the Council will also see a lot of people retiring in the next 5 years, which could potentially be about
20% of the staff. He felt succession planning is important in all of the departments.
AgencymembedBoardmember/Councilmember Williams stated she endorses all the comments that have
been made. She felt our City has done more with less than any other city. She stated customer service
is high and is glad to see that training will be reinstated. She hoped that as some of our good people
leave we will attract other good people from other cities. She hoped that the City will have the budget in
place to take care of the things that are in the strategic plan. She hoped that our budget is flexible to take
care of the needs as they occur. She felt there should be a mid-year budget review to go over things.
She agreed that there needed to be a 10-year plan looked at for the City. She stated possibly we might
need to go to the voters to fund more public safety services.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he did not feel the building of the Fire Administrative Building will take
away from building any new station. He stated it is always the maintenance that costs so much.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Michael felt the Council needs to be cautious of the
burden that is placed on staff. He thanked staff for all that they do.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City has an outstanding reputation and people want to work here.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 2, 2005
Page 4
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk/Records Manager
Approved: *
June 9, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetin.q
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City
Council was held on Thursday, June 9, 2005, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center located at
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/President/Mayor William J.
Alexander called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam
Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Chairman/President/Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II; Trang Huynh,
Building Official; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara
Layne, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Helen Leeds, Sr. Accountant; Dave Moore,
Recreation Superintendent; Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician; Deborah Clark, Library
Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst III; and Debra J. Adams,
City Clerk.
Il B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
No communication was made from the public.
II ¢. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS I
C1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated at last week's meeting it was summarized what has changed in the last
few years and what is proposed in this year's budget. He stated department heads are here to answer
any questions the Council might have. He continued to mention some of the things that have been
changed.
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Spagnolo commended Chief Pete Ortiz for following up
on the request for programs for the Sheriff's Department and appreciated the information. He stated the
Council still hadn't talked about the DARE program and felt a non-sworn position should be able to run it.
He stated this would allow a deputy to be on the street. He felt funding should be found for this. He
suggested possibly corporate sponsors could be used.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 9, 2005
Page 2
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the DARE organization does not allow this to be handled by a non-sworn
person as far as distributing the materials.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander stated Ontario does have a DARE program and does not have
sworn people run it.
Chief Ortiz stated as long as DARE materials are not used, you do not need a sworn person.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Williams asked if any of the Sheriff's department cities
have developed their own programs.
Chief Ortiz stated no.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City is paying for all the crossing guards, etc., and that the schools
are not putting any more money into law enforcement programs.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander felt we need to protect and educate school kids.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Michael suggested that Mayor Alexander and
Councilmember Spagnolo meet at the quarterly school district meeting and talk to the superintendents.
Jack Lam, City Manager, suggested they meet with the school board President, not the Superintendent.
AgencymembedBoardmember/Councilmember Spagnolo suggested that Chief Ortiz also meet with them.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt if we develop our own program it would be cheaper for us to do that and
that possibly the program could be abbreviated to reduce the cost. He stated some of the schools did not
feel they are getting their fair share when it comes to sharing and not charging for things.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they would be happy to set the meeting up.
Jim Frost, City Treasurer, asked how much it cost not to run the program.
Chief Ortiz stated he did not know.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander stated if one kid is saved, then it is worth the cost.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Spagnolo mentioned the great affect the "Every 15
Minute Program" has on everyone.
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Michael stated one of the things talked about during the
goals meeting was more public safety awareness programs.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Spagnolo asked if we could get a stat report on the
number of deputies we are getting with this budget and what the ratio would be for our population.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is .75.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Spagnolo stated that still leaves us behind, and felt the
numbers need to change to keep us with population growth.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated some cities' stats come out better because of the way they report their
information.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 9, 2005
Page 3
Agencymember/Beardmember/Councilmember Spagnolo stated he is talking about the ratio of deputies
to population, not stats.
Chairman/PresidentJMayor Alexander mentioned Opticom, and asked who uses it.
Chief Bran stated police, fire and ambulance should use it.
Chairman/President/Mayor Alexander stated all the expense come out of fire budget.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is a fire program, but not a fire expense.
Chairman/PresidentJMayor Alexander stated he felt we should start right now and identify funding for a
station to be located in the northwest portion of the city. He heard the west side is using the fire service
more than the east side where most of the fire personnel are.
Jack Lam, City manager, stated $400,000 is set aside for acquisition of another station.
Agencymember/Boardmember/Councilmember Michael asked if once they find the parcel of land,
wouldn't that be coming back to the Council for appropriation to purchase it, and asked if that would come
from reserve funds.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes.
AgencymembedBoardmember/Councilmember Gutierrez asked who would pay for the operations and
maintenance of it.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that would be identified per a Council policy or resolution.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Gutierrez stated he felt some parts of the City are paying
into the system and other parts of the City are not. He felt this should be looked at to make this fair.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Michael stated once the strategic plan is done this will
help to identify the needs and how we will pay for them.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Williams hoped all of this would be identified in the
strategic plan.
Chief Bryan stated it would be identified in the strategic plan.
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Michael asked about animal control services and if the
new things to be added would come from reserves.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes, that we do not know what the cost will be at this time.
Agencymember/BoardmembedCouncilmember Michael asked questions about various line items and
received clarification from staff. He also inquired about crossing guards.
Pam Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated this will be studied by the City Manager's office and staff will be
coming back to the Council with information with the possibility of a new program for September.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Williams asked about increasing the stipend for the
Planning Commission.
Special Redevelopment Agency/Fire Board/City Council Minutes
June 9, 2005
Page 4
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Commissions by state law cannot receive salaries, but can receive
reimbursement for expenses. He stated a resolution in 1984 it was established to give the Planning
Commission $100 per month.
AgencymembedBoardmembedCouncilmember Williams asked if this could be changed at a regular
meeting.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this could be an item to come back on the Consent Calendar to approve
the increase.
AgencymembedBoardmember/Councilmember Williams felt the Park and Recreation Commission should
receive $50 per month and the PC to receive $150 per month.
Chairman/PresidentJMayor Alexander stated he would like to think about this, and felt it should be
discussed at a future meeting. He was not ready to make this decision tonight.
Agencymember/BoadmembeflCouncilmember Spagnolo stated he agreed with Councilmember Williams'
suggestion.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he could place this on the budget adoption agenda.
The City Council concurred.
The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk/Records Manager
Approved: *
June 15, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 15, 2005, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:27 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Diane Williams and Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Office; Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems
Manager; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Mike Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Ingrid
Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer;
Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor;
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer,
Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; JoAnn Gwynn, Recreation Coordinator;
Ryan Samples, Recreation Coordinator; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho
Cucamonga Police Depadment; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly
Thomas, Management Analyst ~11; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst II; Shirr'l Griffin, Office
Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Sam Spagnolo
I] B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Acceptance of Inland Empire Section APA (American Planning Association) Award for Outstanding
Planning Project - Victoria Gardens.
Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the award to the City Council with a power point presentation given
by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner.
Il c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I
C1. Leslie Grimes congratulated the Planning Department on doing such a wonderful job with Victoria
Gardens. She stated she is concerned about what she has been reading in the papers regarding the
Board of Supervisors and the Colonies Development. She stated she has always felt perception is
everything. She commented on Jim Brulte working with the Colonies. She stated he is a personal friend
of one of the Colonies people. She stated the judge ruled in favor of the Colonies and now it is going to a
Court of Appeals. She stated she felt an attorney should be involved in the settlement of this. She felt
the public should be aware of this and hoped they would look up the information. She felt people should
express their outrage in the newspaper.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 2
C2. John Lyons, Etiwanda, stated he went to a Chamber lunch today and the President stated he went to
the ICSC Conference and commented on how well known Rancho Cucamonga is. He stated developers
are wanting to use City services and not pay for anything and felt the City should take a closer look at
this. He stated Victoria Gardens is a great place except for the three story apartment buildings.
C3. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, commented on the per capita cost for police department. He felt the Police
Department does a great job and that the City always continues looking to see if it is efficient to continue
with the County or have our own police department. He complimented the City Council on the opening of
the Central Park project. He stated he looks forward to the next phase of Central Park. He stated he was
with a group of motorcyclist involved in the Run for the Wall Event, which is a POW/MIA awareness
event. He stated it is a way for veterans to come to terms with what has happened in their lives. He
stated he would like to see if Victoria Gardens might be a starting place to start this run next year.
Councilmember Michael encouraged him to meet with the General Manager of Victoria Gardens to
discuss this.
C4. A man (did not identify himself) congratulated the veterans for getting home from their ride. He
congratulated the City for the opening of Central Park. He asked that the Council discuss at the next
meeting the possibility of placing at Central. Park a sign for identifying that the Freedom's Flame would be
located there.
C5. Hilda Phillips of Terra Vista felt the ground zero tribute is very important. She felt other people would
also appreciate the Freedom's Flame going in at Central Park. She asked the City Council to consider
this. She commented on how great the Senior Center is. She stated the City is very beautiful.
I
D1. Approval of Minutes: May 18, 2005
June 1,2005
June 1,2005 (Special Meeting)
D2. Appr~val ~f warrants~ Register 5~25/2~~5 thr~ugh 6/7~2~~5 and Payr~~l 5.25.2~~5 thr~ugh 6/7/2~~5~
for the total amount of $2,699,860.68.
D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31,2005.
D4. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update.
D5. Approval for the purchase of one (1) lot of IBM Notebooks, Thinkcenter CPU's, Monitors, Imagine,
Warehousing, and Deployment services to the lowest responsible bidder, Insight Public Sector, in the
amount of $371,676, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1001209~5200 (MIS Maintenance and Operations) for
monitors in the amount of $65,558, Acct. No. 1001209-5300 (MIS Contract Services)for warranties in the
amount of $61,100 and Acct. No. 1001209-5605 (MIS Capital Outlay Computer Hardware) for desktop
and notebook computers in the amount not to exceed $245,018, for the Citywide Downstream Upgrade
and Replacement Program.
D6. Approval for the single source purchase of Motorola radios and accessories from Comserco
Communications, of Riverside, in the amount of $53,715.00, funded from Acct. No. 1382105-5603
(COPS/Dreier EOC Grant - Capital Outlay-Equipment), and authorization to transfer $1,161.00 from Acct.
No. 1382105-5152 (Computer Software) and $21,649.00 from Acct. No. 1382105-5300 (Contract
Services) to Acct. No. 1382105-5603.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 3
D7. Approval of Amendment to the CDBG Budget for Fiscal Year 2004/05 by appropriating $18,736.35 to
Acct. No. 1204304-5650-1342204 for improvements to the Norton Fisher House and $16,500.00 to Acct.
No. 1204314-5650-1230204 for the Home Improvement Program; and appropriating $35,236.35 into
grant revenue Acct. No. 1204000-4740.
D8. Approval to establish an "Integrated Waste Management Fund" (Fund 188) to account for revenues
and expenditures associated with the collection of AB939 recycling fees; authorization to transfer AB939
fund balance of $1,665,071 and estimated current year net AB939 revenues of $246,170 (total of
$1,911,241) from the General Fund to the Integrated Waste Management Fund; and authorization to
transfer appropriations in the amount of $1,911,241 into Acct. No. 1188000-8001 and $1,911,241 into
Acct. No. 1001001-9188.
D9. Approval of a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes for a waiver of rental fees associated
with a Family Fun Fest to be held at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter on July 6, 2005.
D10. Approval of a request by Alta Loma and Citrus Little Leagues and District 21 for a light variance
requested for Major (11-12) Division Ali-Star Tournament hosted by Alta Loma and Citrus Little League
on July 5 - July 20, 2005, at Heritage Park and Red Hill Park.
Dll. Approval of Amendment to the City's Salary Resolution No. 04-313 to include Animal Services
Director Classification.
D12. Approval of a Resolution to supercede Resolution No. 85-130 which will amend the list of officers
who are authorized to participate in the Local Agency Investment Fund for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-85-130A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LIST OF OFFICERS
WHO ARE AUTHORIZED TO ORDER THE DEPOSIT OF
WITHDRAWAL OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT
FUND FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
D13. Approval to execute an Addendum to the Software License and Support Agreement between
SunGard Bi-Tech, Inc., and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the total amount of $87,378 ($32,250 for
software license fees funded out of Acct. No. 1001209-5152; $5,328 for first year support and $49,800 for
professional services funded out of Acct. No. 1001-209-5300); and authorization to purchase three (3)
IBM X Series 336 Servers from IBM Corporation in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to support the
software upgrade (funded out of Acct. No. 1001209-5605).
D14. Approval to increase the contract amount for gasoline and diesel fuel for Fleet Maintenance and the
Police Department from Poma Distributing Company, Inc., of San Bernardino, in an annual amount not to
exceed $270,000, funded from Acct Nos. 1001317-5255 and 1001317-5256 and an annual amount not to
exceed $210,000, funded from Acct. No. 1001701-5255, as approved in the FY 04/05 amended budget.
D15. Approval of release of a deposit and payment in the amount of $179,724.09 to Rancho Etiwanda
685, LLC, for a developer deposit associated with the formation of Landscape Maintenance District 10
and approval of an appropriation of $179,724.09 to Acct. No. 1140-303-5650/1026140-0, to be funded
from LMD No. 10 (Fund 140)fund balance.
D16. Approval to reject all bids received for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to
Arrow Route as non-responsive to the needs of the City, and approval to authorize the re-advertising of
the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route, to be
funded from Acct. Nos. 1180-303-5650/1472180-0 and 1208-303-5650/1472208-0.
City Council Minutes
June 15,2005
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 05-194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO RE-ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR THE
"GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO
ARROW ROUTE"
D17. Approval for award and execution of Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $79,760.00
to AKM Consulting Engineers (CO 05-056), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $7,976.00 for the update of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Master Plan and Fees
Update, to be funded from Fund 001 - General Fund, Acct. No. 1001305-5300.
D18. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $37,352.50 to the apparent Iow bidder, Athletic Field Specialists, Inc. (CO 05-057), for the base
bid and additive bid of their proposal, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount
of $3,735.25 for the "Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park" project, to be
funded from Park Development funds, Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1222120-0.
D19. Approval of an agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Foothill Crossing, LLC (CO 05-058), authorize the expenditure of funds for the purchase
price and appropriate $6,532,579.50 (purchase price) to Acct. No. 2660801-5650/1360660-6312 from the
2004 TAB Bond proceeds.
D20. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $1,084,270.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, H & H Genera/Contractors, Inc. (CO 05-059),
and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $108,427.90 for the "Foothill
Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa
Avenue" project, to be funded from General Engineering Project Management funds, Acct. No. 1001307-
5650/1506001-0, and appropriate an additional amount of $200,000.00 to Acct. No. 1001307-
5650/1506001-0 from General Engineering Project Management fund balance.
D21. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Maximus (CO FD 05-060) in the amount of
$25,000 to perform a comprehensive review of Fire District fees, to be funded from Acct. No. 1016301-
5300.
D22. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $174,945.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Roadway Engineering, Inc. (CO 05-061), and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,494.50 for The Northeast Corner of
Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Avenue Curb Return project, to be funded from Transportation funds, Acct.
No. 1124303-5650/1466124-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $16,000.00 to Acct. No. 1124303-
5650/1466124-0 from Transportation fund balance.
D23. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount
of $38,405.00 the apparent Iow bidder, Sadie Construction, Inc. (CO 05-062), of Atwood, California, and
authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,840.00 for "Citywide Street Name
Sign Replacement, Phase 3" project, from the Capital Reserve Acct. No. 1025001-5300 as approved in
the FY 04/05 budget.
D24. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2001-00572, located at 9649 Foothill
Boulevard on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by McDonald's
Corporation.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 05-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00572 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D25. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRC2003-00732, located on the north and south
sides of Jack Benny Drive, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Bates-Evergreen Partners, LLC &
Stadium Plaza South, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-196
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DRC2003-00732
D26. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DRCDR00-79, located at the southwest corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-197
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUGAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DRCDR00-79
D27. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of
Completion for the perimeter improvements for Tract 15814, located on the southwest corner of Highland
and Rochester Avenues, submitted by Fieldstone Communities, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-198
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRACT PERIMETER IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 15814 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D28. Approval to accept the Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 03-073 as
complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $10,488,241.41.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-199
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE lB OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONTRACT NO. 03-073
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D29. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials
Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 05-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACEMENT, PHASE 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
Motion: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously Rex 4-0-1 (Spagnolo
absent).
l] E. CONSENT ORDINANCES I
El. CONSIDERATION OF 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEFD
LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 743.
ORDINANCE NO. 743 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
743. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent)
l] F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PROPOSFD
MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD
OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AND THE BOND AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT)
Mayor Alexander stated this is the time and place for the combined public hearings relating to Community
Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit). He added these public hearings re[ate to the proposed
modifications to the facilities authorized to be financed by such district, the rate and method of
apportionment of special taxes authorized to be levied within such district and the bond authorization for
such district. He asked the City Clerk to report on the notice of the public hearings.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, stated the notice of the public hearing has been given in the form and
manner as required by law.
A staff report was presented by Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 7
Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor, stated there has been no protest count of registered voters
or owners relating to this.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-201
A RESOLUTION OF THE C~TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED
MODIFICATIONS TO THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE
FINANCED BY SUCH DISTRICT, THE RATE AND METHOD OF
APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED WITHIN
SUCH DISTRICT AND THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
FOR SUCH DISTRICT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF
FOR SUCH DISTRICT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 05-201. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, canvassed and announced the results of the election by stating Proposition
A, B and C received 130 votes in favor and there was no opposition.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-202
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A
SPECIAL ELECTION TO AUTHORIZE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED, THE RATE AND METHOD OF
APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES TO BE LEVIED AND THE
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 05-202. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
RESOLUTION NO. 05-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN
ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT)
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 05-203. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
Mayor Alexander read the title of Ordinance No. 744.
ORDINANCE NO. 744 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 643 AND
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) PURSUANT
TO AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD OF
APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 8
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 744 for the July 6, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
No items Submitted.
Ii I-I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF R~PORTS II
H1. APPROVAL OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL STATUS AND REJECTION OF ALL
BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM
AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II) AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS
OF THE CITY.
A staff report was presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Councilmember Michael asked when he would be going out to bid for phase I and 2.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated if the Council follows staffs recommendation, they should be able to
finish up the design on the Haven to Etiwanda piece in the next three months and in the fall they would be
going out to bid so that construction should start in January 2006 on both phases.
Councilmember Gutierrez asked Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, to explain what the trail would look like.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, explained this.
Councilmember Williams asked if Brad Buller, City Planner, and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, have looked at
this to see if anything can be taken out to lower the amount of the project.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that is a possibility and something to be looked at for the next bid
process.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, added the signals add a lot to the total amount of the project.
Councilmember Williams asked if there was any opportunity for grant applications.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they ara always looking for these.
Mayor Alexander opened the item for public comment. There being no response, public comment was
closed.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve staffs recommendation. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
H2. UPDATE ON PROGRAMS AT THE CENTRAL PARK JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER AND
GOLDY S. LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER (Oral)
A staff report and power point presentation were given by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Ryan
Samples, Recreation Coordinator; and JoAnn Gwynn, Recreation Coordinator.
City Council Minutes
June15,2005
Page 9
ACTION: Repod received and filed
]] I. COUNCIL BUSINESS ]
I1. DISCUSSION ON COST CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO THE TRANSITION FROM A COUNTY
TO A CITY OPERATED ANIMAL SHELTER
A staff report was presented by Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, who stated City staff has been
working with County staff on the Transition Agreement for the two agencies as we transition January 31,
2006 to a City operated facility. She stated as part of the proposal by the County, they have stated they
plan on a $377,000 transition attrition cost to cover the County staff that currently run the shelter, which
will not have jobs with the County once the transition is completed. She stated the County has asked the
City to pay for this cost until they are absorbed into vacant positions at the County. She stated Mayor
Alexander and Councilmember Spagnolo have expressed concern for this and wanted to make the entire
Council is aware of this.
Mayor Alexander felt this is a form of extortion and did not feel they deserved any money to phase out
their obligation. He did not feel the City is obligated to supply employment for the County of San
Bernardino once the City takes over this facility. He stated our budget is already tight and did not feel it is
the City's fault that the County did not heed what the Council was asking for as far as obeying the law,
and did not feel they did the things they were supposed to do. He hoped this would be an amiable
transition and hoped they could keep their jobs for a period of time, but he did not feel the City should pay
them $377,000.
Councilmember Michael asked for clarification of this process.
Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, outlined the steps that would be taken to complete the transition
process. She stated they have an aggressive role to complete this by January 31,2006.
Councilmember Michael stated this is the County's first attempt to come up with an amount.
Pamela Easter, Deputy Manager, stated the City will be working with the County to reduce this cost they
are asking for.
Councilmember Michael asked if we paid a transition cost when we transitioned the Library.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this should be done in an orderly way for the City to take over the
service. He stated with the Library we had a little over two years. He told the process that occurred to
complete this transition. He stated the County transition was a little over $750,000, which was paid over
10 years. He stated this could not be done with the shelter because there is no tax to be paid.
Councilmember Williams asked if it is possible that some of these people might have jobs once the
transition is completed. She felt they should be treated fairly and do what we need to do.
Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, confirmed this.
Mayor Alexander asked how much consideration was given to Library employees when their transition
was done. He also asked how we transition a contract employee out of the City.
Jack Lam, City Manager stated the difference is a contract employee vs. contract services and we are
paying them transition cost. He stated on the Library side, we negotiated that differently because we
were able to put those transition costs into the transfer of the taxes to be paid, and added there are no
taxes to be paid here.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 10
Councilmember Gutierrez asked if this is common practice to pay this money.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is common to have transition costs.
Mayor Alexander did not feel we are obligated to pay this and felt it was taking away from our residents.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt if this is common practice and we expect the County to help us to be on our
own it might be warranted and felt this should be explored.
Councilmember Michael stated it if was the City, we would try to absorb them into our system some way.
He felt if some of these County employees have 60 to 70% of the qualifications for a position, they should
be absorbed into other types of positions. He asked Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, to put this as
a negotiating point with the County.
,Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the staff would do its best to negotiate this transition process.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were:
A lady (did not identify herself) stated she agreed with the Mayor and felt this was too much
money. She stated they are breaking the law and felt they should be penalized. She stated
Nicole Myerchin keeps reporting to her about the animals that are being killed at the shelter. She
stated there are other issues at the shelter also. She felt someone needs to be down there
policing the lives of the animals now while the transition is going on. She hoped the Council
would go down to the shelter and see for themselves what is going on.
John Lyons felt this should be put on the ballot for an election because it needed some tax base.
He felt by July 1 we should get volunteers to run the shelter. He felt Code Enforcement could
also do animal control.
Leslie Grimes stated she goes along with the Mayor and did not understand the $377,000 cost for
the transition. She did not feel we should be absorbing their salaries until they find a job.
Ted Myerchin stated this money would pay for a full time Vet and other services for a full year.
He felt we needed to get the right people in the shelter before we remodel. He felt this would be
paying extortion fees if we do this.
Councilmember Williams felt we need a good business plan in place before we start quoting numbers.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated we are working on the business plan and then the Council can decide if it
is a good plan or not.
Leslie Grimes hoped the City will go to Riverside's shelter and talk to their people to get an idea
of their costs. They could also be talked to about how they get their volunteers.
Councilmember Gutierrez felt this is very scary to do this transition. He felt Rancho Cucamonga is a
volunteer City and would hopefully get many people to volunteer at the shelter.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.)
Councilmember Michael stated we are approaching a great celebration on July 4th. He stated because
he is an former Fire Chief, he wanted to remind the public that fireworks are not allowed in the City. He
hoped people would keep the City as safe as possible. He commented on the volunteer event this past
weekend. He encouraged people to join the Fire Safe Council and volunteer to help keep the City safe.
City Council Minutes
June 15, 2005
Page 11
Councilmember Williams also commented on the volunteer celebration and stated it was wonderful. She
stated there are some volunteers at the Library that have been doing this a very long time and stated her
hat is off to them. She also informed everyone about the steel going up at Victoria Gardens for the
Cultural Center. She stated July 15th there would be a topping off celebration for the Cultural Center
because it will be the tallest piece of steel installed, which would be at least 70 feet. She stated in less
than one year this facility will be open.
Councilmember Gutierrez endorsed everything that has been said about fireworks and stated it is a safety
issue. He felt it was a good thing what the City is doing to save the lives of the animals. He told about
traffic problems in some of the neighborhoods and the speed that is occurring through these
neighborhoods. He asked everyone to slow down.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated that due to the fact we did not have a quorum at 5:30 when
closed session began, he is assuming the Council would like to handle this matter at this time.
He stated there is now a need to add an item to the closed session agenda regarding pending
litigation with the Spirit of the Sage Council.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to add the closed session as indicated above.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
II J. ADJOURNMENT [
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn to closed session. Motion carried
unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:21 p.m. with no action taken in closed
session.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
June 16, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetinfl
II A. CALL TO ORDER II
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, June 16, 2005, in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 5:16 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Diane Williams and Mayor William J.
Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Robert Lemon,
Management Analyst II; Erica Darplee, Management Analyst I; Brad Buller, City Planner; Trang Huynh,
Building Official; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara
Layne, Finance Officer; Helen Leeds, Sr. Accountant; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager; Kevin
McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Manager;
Michelle Perera, Reference Services Coordinator; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Pam Pane, Management
Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was Councilmember: Sam Spagnolo
No communication was made from the public.
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
O1. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
C2. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT (CO 05-063) FOR CITY FUNDING FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES
C3. APPROVAL TO RESCIND AND UPDATE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 84-191 PERTAINING
TO REIMBURSEMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
RESOLUTION NO. 05-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-191
IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ESTABLISHING NEW PROVISIONS FOR
REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR EXPENSES INCURRED WHILE SERVING AS MEMBERS OF
THE COMMISSION
Special City Council Minutes
June 16, 2005
Page 2
C4. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE LEVEL OF F~SCAL RESERVES FOR THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 05-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE LEVEL OF FISCAL
RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
C5. APPROVAL TO AMEND SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-313 REFLECTING POSITIONS
AND SALARY RANGES FOR 2005-2006
RESOLUTION NO. 04-3,13A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF
RESOLUTION NO. 04-313 TO REFLECT POSITIONS AND SALARY
RANGES FOR FY 2005-2006
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
D1. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIII-B APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT
A staff report was presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
RESOLUTION NO. 05-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR
2005/2006 BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO. 05-207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII-B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006
MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution Nos. 05-206 and 05-207.
Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Spagnolo absent).
Special City Council Minutes
June 16, 2005
Page 3
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1
(Spagnolo absent).
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
July 6, 2005
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meeting
11 A. (2ALL TO ORDER II
A special meeting of the Rancho Gucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 6, 2005, in the
Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez (arrived at 3:08 p.m.), L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo,
Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; ~ngrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Chris Bopko, Special
Districts Analyst; Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
II P nic ¢OMM IC^TIONS [
No communication was made from the public.
C. ITEM(S) OF DISCUSSION
C1. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT POLICIES AND GOALS,
iNCLUDING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFA)
Jack stated they wanted to stad with a review of the CFD's so the City Council would have more
information about them to see if modifications are needed.
Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor, introduced Warren Diven, Bond Counsel & Disclosure
Counsel with Best, Best & Krieger LLP; Jim Fabian, Financial Advisor with Fieldman, Rolapp &
Associates, and David Taussig, Special Tax Consultant & CFD Administrator from David Taussig &
Associates.
Messrs. Diven, Fabian and Taussig gave a power point presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
Jack Lam, City Manager, felt it was good to review these policies and give any suggested changes the
City Council would like.
Mayor Alexander did not feel we should be burdening anyone and felt there should be a cap.
Various members of City Council commented the presentation was well done, and that most of their
questions were answered during the presentation.
Special City Council Minutes
July 6, 2005
Page 2
Councilmember Williams felt when this is presented it should be done in a way that is over-simplified for
people.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated a staff report would be presented when this comes before the Council for
adoption.
Councilmember Williams felt the more disclosure to the homebuyer the better.
Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor, stated they do go to the sales offices of a development to
be sure this is being done so that people are aware of what is being charged to them.
Councilmember Williams felt it would be good to have a brochure to hand out to people so when they go
to buy a home they have something in writing identifying what will be charged to them.
ACTION: There was consensus to bring the policy to an upcoming meeting agenda at the earliest
convenience.
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Spagnolo to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1
(Spagnolo absent). The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00224761 6/30/2005 HAKIMI, SUSAN 488.91
AP - 00224762 7/6/2005 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 6,041.21
AP - 00224763 7/6/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 319.99
AP - 00224763 7/6/2005 AA EQUIPMENT 78.87
AP - 00224764 7/6/2005 ABC LOCKSMITHS 29.05
AP - 00224765 7/6/2005 ADAMSON, RONALD 495.00
AP - 00224766 7/6/2005 ADT SECURITY SERVICES [NC 349.35
AP - 00224767 7/6/2005 AIRGAS WEST 32.30
AP - 00224769 7/6/2005 ALL AIR APPLIANCE MASTERS 325.00
AP - 00224769 7/6/2005 ALL AIR APPLIANCE MASTERS 104.24
AP - 00224770 7/6/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 398.75
AP - 00224770 7/6/2005 ALL CITIES TOOLS 193.02
AP - 00224772 7/6/2005 ALVAREZ, GULLERMO 40.00
AP - 00224773 7/6/2005 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION [NC. 184.88
AP - 00224774 7/6/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. 697.13
AP - 00224774 7/6/2005 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. [NC. 227.61
AP - 00224775 7/6/2005 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191.99
AP - 00224776 7/6/2005 ANUMBA, ETHEL 196.00
AP - 00224777 7/6/2005 ARBOR NURSERY [NC 260.74
AP - 00224777 7/6/2005 ARBOR NURSERY INC 300.00
AP - 00224778 7/6/2005 ARCHULETA, TOMMIE 62.00
AP - 00224778 7/6/2005 ARCHULETA, TOMMIE 95.00
AP - 00224780 7/6/2005 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 54.18
AP - 00224781 7/6/2005 ASSI SECURITY 175.00
AP - 00224782 7/6/2005 AUFBAU CORPORATION 14,352.00
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 545.11
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 75.71
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 525.17
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 72.52
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 359.26
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -179.94
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 59.80
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 270.45
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,113.93
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 85.79
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 57.80
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 587.71
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 467.20
AP - 00224783 7/6/2005 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 55.95
AP - 00224784 7/6/2005 BABCO CONSTRUCTION 1NC 1,000.00
AP - 00224785 7/6/2005 BAKER, JILL 90.00
AP - 00224786 7/6/2005 BANEGAS, SILVIA 72.00
AP - 00224786 7/6/2005 BANEGAS, SILVIA 36.00
AP - 00224787 7/6/2005 BARLOW, MARIA 20.00
AP - 00224788 7/6/2005 BARNASH, SHANNON 34.00
AP - 00224788 7/6/2005 BARNASH, SHANNON 34.00
AP - 00224789 7/6/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE 641.24
AP - 00224789 7/6/2005 BARNES AND NOBLE '32.58
AP ~ 00224790 7/6/2005 BASSLER, DYAN 60.00
AP - 00224791 7/6/2005 BEARINGS AND DRIVES [NC 109.65
AP - 00224792 7/6/2005 BEI BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 124.00
AP - 00224793 7/6/2005 BERCH, ANNA 40.00
AP - 00224794 7/6/2005 BIGLOW, LAKEISHA 48.00 ~
AP - 00224795 7/6/2005 BISHOP COMPANY 432.07
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224796 7/6/2005 BLOOMENSTEIN, SHARI 40.00
AP - 00224797 7/6/2005 BODINE, JASON 36.00
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 8.90
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 28.36
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 23.65
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 5,833.11
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 172.32
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 18.23
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 13.61
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 8.90
AP - 00224798 7/6/2005 BRODART BOOKS 1,649.54
AP - 00224799 7/6/2005 BUL, TOAN 156.00
AP - 00224800 7/6/2005 BURNING-PEREZ, ARHLENE 70.00
AP - 00224801 7/6/2005 BURRIGHT, TERI 72.00
AP - 00224802 7/6/2005 CABALU, MARJORIE 45.50
AP - 00224803 7/6/2005 CABANA, DEBBIE 39.99
AP - 00224804 7/6/2005 CALBO 130.00
AP - 00224804 7/6/2005 CALBO 97.50
AP - 00224805 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 1,496.03
AP - 00224805 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 756.24
AP - 00224805 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 175.61
AP - 00224805 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 128.26
AP - 00224805 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 145.20
AP ~ 00224806 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 297.78
AP - 00224806 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 208.75
AP - 00224807 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 225.00
AP - 00224808 7/6/2005 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 2,192.36
AP - 00224809 7/6/2005 CALSENSE 383.78
AP - 00224809 7/6/2005 CALSENSE 6,400.29
AP - 00224810 7/6/2005 CAMERON WELDING 36.42
AP - 00224811 7/6/2005 CARRASCO, ELAINE 40.00
AP - 00224812 7/6/2005 CASILLAS, CHRISTINE 85.00
AP - 00224813 7/6/2005 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 31.25
AP 00224814 7/6/2005 CHEMSEARCH 286.46
AP 00224814 7/6/2005 CHEMSEARCH 149.47
AP 00224815 7/6/2005 CHEON, SUNNY 100.00
AP 00224816 7/6/2005 CITY RENTALS 792.00
AP 00224817 7/6/2005 CITY WIDE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 55.90
AP 00224818 7/6/2005 CLEAN STREET 895.00
AP 00224819 7/6/2005 CLOUGH, DEONI 90.00
AP 00224820 7/6/2005 CNOA REGION III TRAINING GROUP 47 35.00
AP - 00224820 7/6/2005 CNOA REGION III TRAINING GROUP 47 35.00
AP - 00224821 7/6/2005 COAST RECREATION INC 467.73
AP - 00224822 7/6/2005 COLE, NINA 10.72
AP - 00224824 7/6/2005 CONTRERAS, LORNA 555.00
AP - 00224825 7/6/2005 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 190.24
AP - 00224825 7/6/2005 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,623.48
AP - 00224825 7/6/2005 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 800.00
AP - 00224825 7/6/2005 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO ]NC 910.00
AP - 00224825 7/6/2005 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC !,620.00 ~
AP - 00224827 7/6/2005 CUADRAS, MIGUEL 46.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 601.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,153.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,495.69
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,358.03
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 586.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMOI~GA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 409.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 710.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.18
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 35.78
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.78
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 387.68
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 472.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,233.68
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 667.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,707.83
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,647.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 54.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 421.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.38
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 612.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.98
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 280.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 537.68
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,897.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.68
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 596.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 670.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 30.98
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 36.98
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 243.63
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 375.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 738.62
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.88
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 623.48
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 336.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 823.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,127.68
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 330.08
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,473.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,138.61
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,042.36
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,837.28
AP - 00224829 7/6/2005 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.88
AP - 00224830 7/6/2005 CUT ABOVE CONSTRUCTION 250.i)0
00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00 '~
AP
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 1,225.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES [NC 2,800.00
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES [NC 2,275.00
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES 1NC 350.00
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 350.00
AP - 00224831 7/6/2005 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,625.00
AP - 00224832 7/6/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 732.70
AP - 00224832 7/6/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 394.37
AP - 00224832 7/6/2005 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 474.10
AP - 00224833 7/6/2005 DAADOUCH, KASIBA 36.00
AP - 00224835 7/6/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 5,910.00
AP - 00224835 7/6/2005 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 30,000.00
AP - 00224836 7/6/2005 DAPPER TIRE CO 156.90
AP - 00224837 7/6/2005 DATA QUICK 93.50
AP - 00224838 7/6/2005 DELTA MICROIMAG1NG [NC 1,115.65
AP - 00224838 7/6/2005 DELTA MICROIMAGING [NC 3,088.14
AP - 00224839 7/6/2005 DIETER[CH POST COMPANY 191.27
AP - 00224840 7/6/2005 D1RECTV 59.90
AP - 00224841 7/6/2005 DRIVER ALLIANT SPECIAL EVENTS 482.26
AP - 00224842 7/6/2005 DUGAN, ALLISON 714.00
AP - 00224843 7/6/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 128.01
AP - 00224843 7/6/2005 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 247.66
AP - 00224845 7/6/2005 EBSCO 10.00
AP - 00224846 7/6/2005 ECOL[NE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 287.21
AP - 00224847 7/6/2005 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 25.86
AP - 00224848 7/6/2005 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT [NC 107.75
AP - 00224849 7/6/2005 ELLISON SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 2,127.58
AP - 00224850 7/6/2005 ESPINAL, NANCY 200.00
AP - 00224851 7/6/2005 ESR[ [NC 9,900.00
AP - 00224851 7/6/2005 ESR[ [NC 8,046.99
AP - 00224852 7/6/2005 ESTRADA, RACHEL 96.00
AP - 00224853 7/6/2005 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 964.49
AP - 00224853 7/6/2005 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 237.73
AP - 00224853 7/6/2005 EW[NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 227.88
AP - 00224854 7/6/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 172.40
AP - 00224854 7/6/2005 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 126.06
AP - 00224855 7/6/2005 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 200.00
AP - 00224856 7/6/2005 FABRIS-OTHMAN, SUSAN 20.00
AP - 00224857 7/6/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.69
AP - 00224857 7/6/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.29
AP - 00224857 7/6/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 25.95
AP - 00224857 7/6/2005 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 15.62
AP - 00224859 7/6/2005 F1NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 651.00
AP - 00224859 7/6/2005 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 630.00
AP - 00224860 7/6/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 265.04
AP - 00224860 7/6/2005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 326.29
AP - 00224861 ,7/6/2005 FOOTHILL CROSSINGS LLC 113,957.00
AP - 00224862 7/6/2005 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 417.00
AP - 00224863 7/6/2005 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER 655.48
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 687.72
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 37.08
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 196.15
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 108.99 ~
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 925.29
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porlxait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND INC 133.00
AP - 00224864 7/6/2005 FORD OF UPLAND 1NC 36.78
AP - 00224867 7/6/2005 FRIENDS OF READ LITERACY PROGRAMS 25.00
AP - 00224868 7/6/2005 FUENTES, SONIA 50.00
AP - 00224869 7/6/2005 FUERTE, MARGATITA 86.00
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAIL MATERIALS 1,450.30
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAlL MATERIALS 2,000.00
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAlL MATERIALS 229.28
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAIL MATERIALS 2,065.72
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAIL MATERIALS 200.00
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAlL MATERIALS 98.35
AP - 00224870 7/6/2005 GAlL MATERIALS 800.00
AP - 00224871 7/6/2005 GARRISON, GWENDOLYN 70.00
AP - 00224872 7/6/2005 GAUDY, JESSICA 70.00
AP - 00224873 7/6/2005 GIBBONS, TRACY 130.00
AP - 00224874 7/6/2005 GLADSTE[N AND ASSOCIATES 3,071.25
AP - 00224875 7/6/2005 GONZALEZ, ARLENE 40.00
AP - 00224876 7/6/2005 GRA1NGER 5,236.65
AP - 00224876 7/6/2005 GRAINGER 38.85
AP - 00224876 7/6/2005 GRAINGER 23.78
AP - 00224876 7/6/2005 GRAINGER -2,442.80
AP - 00224877 7/6/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 219.51
AP ~ 00224877 7/6/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUII>MENT 332.94
AP - 00224877 7/6/2005 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1.88
AP ~ 00224878 7/6/2005 GUARDADO, SILVIA 40.00
AP - 00224879 7/6/2005 GUINN, THOMAS 110.00
AP - 00224880 7/6/2005 GUTIERREZ, REX 241.74
AP - 00224881 7/6/2005 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 15,947.00
AP - 00224882 7/6/2005 HALLENBECK, CHRISTINE 32.00
AP - 00224883 7/6/2005 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 678.85
AP - 00224885 7/6/2005 HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER 14.58
AP - 00224887 7/6/2005 HENDRICKSON, ELLEN 100.00
AP 00224888 7/6/2005 HERNANDEZ, DIANA 251.50
AP 00224889 7/6/2005 HERNANDEZ, HECTOR 60.00
AP 00224890 7/6/2005 HERTZ EQUIP RENTAL 767.64
AP 00224893 7/6/2005 HILL, MICHELLE 46.00
AP 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 300.63
AP 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 300.37
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 313.81
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 224.13
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 108.83
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 293.35
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 1,301.62
AP - 00224894 7/6/2005 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 48.72
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 30.44
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 155.01
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 81.58
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 19.52
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 179.86
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 60.96
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 58.52
AP - 00224895 7/6/2005 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 65.19
AP - 00224896 7/6/2005 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS AND EDUCATI( 535.00 ~-
AP - 00224898 7/6/2005 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL [NC 306.94
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount
AP - 00224899 7/6/2005 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00
AP - 00224900 7/6/2005 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 244.38
AP - 00224900 7/6/2005 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 27.11
AP - 00224901 7/6/2005 HUNTER-EGANS, ERICKA 48.00
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS lINC 579.91
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 500.00
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 18.94
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 667.10
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 45.10
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 325.73
AP - 00224902 7/6/2005 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 500.00
AP - 00224903 7/6/2005 IGOE, TAMMY 72.00
AP - 00224904 7/6/2005 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 303.43
AP - 00224904 7/6/2005 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 62.48
AP - 00224904 7/6/2005 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 504.08
AP - 00224904 7/6/2005 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 795.66
AP - 00224905 7/6/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 1,248.25
AP - 00224905 7/6/2005 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 644.80
AP - 00224906 7/6/2005 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 20.00
AP - 00224908 7/6/2005 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 82.43
AP - 00224909 7/6/2005 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND [NC 25.00
AP - 00224910 7/6/2005 ISA 140.00
AP - 00224911 7/6/2005 ITE 95.20
AP - 00224912 7/6/2005 ITE 72.80
AP - 00224913 7/6/2005 IZQUIEDO, KARLA 40.00
AP - 00224914 7/6/2005 JAMES, AMY 62.00
AP - 00224915 7/6/2005 JIMENEZ, CRYSTAL 50.00
AP - 00224916 7/6/2005 JOHN, ANDREA 50.00
AP - 00224917 7/6/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 500.00
AP - 00224917 7/6/2005 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,353.52
AP - 00224918 7/6/2005 JONES, BOB 2,560.00
AP - 00224919 7/6/2005 KAITZ RESIDENCE 36.00
AP - 00224920 7/6/2005 KARATSU, ROBERT 32.00
AP - 00224921 7/6/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS [NC 1,420.15
AP - 00224921 7/6/2005 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS [NC 0.12
AP - 00224922 7/6/2005 KENDRENA, DONNA 214.28
AP - 00224923 7/6/2005 KIEFER & ASSOCIATES 5.25
AP - 00224923 7/6/2005 KIEFER & ASSOCIATES 345.48
AP - 00224924 7/6/2005 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 4,792.00
AP - 00224924 7/6/2005 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 4,792.00
AP - 00224924 7/6/2005 KiMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 4,792.00
AP - 00224924 7/6/2005 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 4,792.00
AP - 00224924 7/6/2005 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 4,792.00
AP - 00224925 7/6/2005 KLINEDINST, MARY 80.00
AP - 00224926 7/6/2005 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 129.09
AP - 00224927 7/6/2005 KRAM, FATNE 40.00
AP - 00224928 7/6/2005 LAMOUREUX, JULIE 120.00
AP - 00224929 7/6/2005 LASALVA, JANUARY 24.00
AP - 00224930 7/6/2005 LASHIN, DIANA 50.00
AP - 00224931 7/6/2005 LEE, JIYOUN 72.00
AP - 00224934 7/6/2005 MANSOURI MSCE PE, IRAJ 1,920.00
AP - 00224935 7/6/2005 MAR1N, MALINDA 56.00
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 316.47
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -68.87
User: VLOPEZ- Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -42.52
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -107.27
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -25.25
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -54.16
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -129.34
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 517.34
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 216.62
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 101.00
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 429.08
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 170.08
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING 275.49
AP - 00224936 7/6/2005 MARSHALL PLUMBING -79.12
AP - 00224937 7/6/2005 MAYOL, JOY 36.00
AP - 00224938 7/6/2005 MCBRIDE, J COLLEEN 4,800.00
AP - 00224939 7/6/2005 MCCULLOUGH, LLORI 40.00
AP - 00224940 7/6/2005 MCRAVEN, MICHAEL 16.00
AP - 00224941 7/6/2005 MILLWEE, DANIEL 500.00
AP - 00224942 7/6/2005 MONSTER MURAL LLC, THE 703.00
AP - 00224943 7/6/2005 MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES, J WILLIAM 1,000.00
AP - 00224943 7/6/2005 MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES, J WILLIAM 750.00
AP - 00224944 7/6/2005 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM 3,800.00
AP - 00224946 7/6/2005 NELWAN, FANY FRED 75.00
AP - 00224947 7/6/2005 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.39
AP - 00224948 7/6/2005 NGUYEN, HAl 102.13
AP - 00224949 7/6/2005 NIEL, BETSY 60.00
AP - 00224950 7/6/2005 NUNEZ, VERONICA 80.00
AP - 00224950 7/6/2005 NUNEZ, VERONICA 20.00
AP - 00224951 7/6/2005 O'BRIEN, MICHAEL 130.00
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 149.13
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 11.09
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 29.62
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 77.60
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 206.88
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 1,386.20
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 865.79
AP - 00224952 7/6/2005 OFFICE DEPOT 996.90
AP - 00224953 7/6/2005 OFFICE MAX 864.85
AP - 00224953 7/6/2005 OFFICE MAX 665.90
AP - 00224953 7/6/2005 OFFICE MAX 252.56
AP - 00224954 7/6/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 275.00
AP - 00224954 7/6/2005 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 842.05
AP - 00224955 7/6/2005 PARK, EUN SUNG 27.00
AP - 00224956 7/6/2005 PASCO, AIDA 88.00
AP - 00224957 7/6/2005 PATTON SALES CORP 80.70
AP - 00224958 7/6/2005 PERERA, MICHELLE 90.66
AP - 00224959 7/6/2005 PEREZ, KRISTINA 80.00
AP - 00224960 7/6/2005 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 2,044.20
AP - 00224961 7/6/2005 PHUNG, THU 60.00
AP - 00224962 7/6/2005 PICKRELL, JOHN 500.00
AP - 00224963 7/6/2005 POWER PLUS 25.00
AP - 00224963 7/6/2005 POWER PLUS 25.00
AP - 00224965 7/6/2005 PUNSALAN, MARIAN 36.00
AP - 00224966 7/6/2005 KANCHO ETlWANDA 685 LLC 179,724.09 ~
AP - 00224967 7/6/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 177.79
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 07/13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00224967 7/6/2005 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 54.95
AP - 00224968 7/6/2005 RCPFA 6,89t .91
AP - 00224969 7/6/2005 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 48.49
AP - 00224970 7/6/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 4,058.93
AP - 00224970 7/6/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 6,272.04
AP - 00224970 7/6/2005 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 20,822.19
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,806.70
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,861.60
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,888.88
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,987.20
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 33,441.87
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 25,260.40
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 561.60
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 45.00
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 681.00
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 56.00
AP - 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,045.45
AP 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 4,002.55
AP 00224972 7/6/2005 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,213.82
AP 00224973 7/6/2005 RISING STARS 930.00
AP 00224974 7/6/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 346.52
AP 00224974 7/6/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 28.12
AP 00224974 7/6/2005 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 85.53
AP 00224975 7/6/2005 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 4,307.50
AP 00224975 7/6/2005 RODRIGUEZ 1NC, R Y 2,906.38
AP 00224976 7/6/2005 RODRIGUEZ, PATRICIA 137.75
AP 00224977 7/6/2005 RPG ROOFING 16,500.00
AP 00224978 7/6/2005 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 699.77
AP 00224979 7/6/2005 SAN BER.NARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 2,157.00
AP 00224979 7/6/2005 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 812.00
AP 00224982 7/6/2005 SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY 4,483.35
AP 00224983 7/6/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 330.41
AP 00224984 7/6/2005 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 14,715.00
AP 00224985 7/6/2005 SAN BERNARD[NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 6,653.31
AP 00224987 7/6/2005 SANDOVAL, ANGELA 110.00
AP 00224988 7/6/2005 SAVALA, PAVLOR 20.00
AP 00224989 7/6/2005 SBC LONG DISTANCE 23.02
AP 00224989 7/6/2005 SBC LONG DISTANCE -2.00
AP 00224990 7/6/2005 SCHAEFER, TERESA 70.00
AP 00224991 7/6/2005 SEGOVIA, OSCAR 12.00
AP 00224992 7/6/2005 SELLECK, GEORGE 40.00
AP 00224994 7/6/2005 SHOETERIA 77.57
AP - 00224995 7/6/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 323.25
AP - 00224995 7/6/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 141.69
AP - 00224995 7/6/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 66.27
AP - 00224995 7/6/2005 SIGN SHOP, THE 180.70
AP - 00224996 7/6/2005 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 1,093.06
AP - 00224997 7/6/2005 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION [NC 20,911.00
AP - 00224997 7/6/2005 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION [NC -2,091.10
AP - 00224998 7/6/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,032.17
AP - 00224998 7/6/2005 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 986.72
AP - 00224999 7/6/2005 SMART AND FINAL 69.83
AP - 00224999 7/6/2005 SMART AND FINAL 37.63 ~
AP - 00225000 7/6/2005 SMITH, KIRK 61.50
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 07/13/200
RePort:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225002 7/6/2005 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED [NC 60.00
AP - 00225003 7/6/2005 SOTO, LORI 500.00
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 17.62
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 227.36
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.16
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.34
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.47
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.33
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.61
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.83
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.12
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.02
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 285.59
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.18
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.05
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.33
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 180.40
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.96
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.66
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.19
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.33
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.49
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.57
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.32
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.14
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.18
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.91
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.47
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.13
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.93
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.22
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.43
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.86
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.56
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.52
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.37
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.82
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.26
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.73
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.10
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.79 ~
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.56
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 07/1-4
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.33
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.52
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.30
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.84
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.10
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.04
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.26
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.47
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CAL1FOP,2NIA EDISON 16.25
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.53
AP 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.51
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.65
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.73
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 531.33
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.40
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.12
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.63
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.16
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.00
AP - 00225007 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.75
AP - 00225008 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30,000.00
AP - 00225008 7/6/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,402.30
AP - 00225009 7/6/2005 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 175.60
AP - 00225010 7/6/2005 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 185.60
AP - 00225010 7/6/2005 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP [NC 229.68
AP - 00225011 7/6/2005 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 6,050.00
AP - 00225011 7/6/2005 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 4,900.00
AP - 00225011 7/6/2005 STANDARD PACIFIC OF INLAND EMPIRE 4,850.00
AP - 00225012 7/6/2005 STATEWlDE RENT A FENCE 1,125.00
AP - 00225013 7/6/2005 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP - 00225014 7/6/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 76.71
AP - 00225014 7/6/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 301.46
AP - 00225014 7/6/2005 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 22.00
AP - 00225015 7/6/2005 STOKES, BRIDGETTE 90.00
AP - 00225016 7/6/2005 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,494.76
AP - 00225016 7/6/2005 STOVER SEED COMPANY 504.35
AP - 00225016 7/6/2005 STOVER SEED COMPANY 242.09
AP - 00225017 7/6/2005 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL 375.00
AP - 00225018 7/6/2005 SUDDEE, UKRIT 36.00
AP - 00225019 7/6/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY I05.00
AP - 00225019 7/6/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -2,100.00
AP - 00225019 7/6/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY -792.85
AP - 00225019 7/6/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 7,928.49
AP - 00225019 7/6/2005 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY 21,000.00
AP - 00225020 7/6/2005 SUNRISE LIFE DEVELOPMENT 556.09
AP - 00225021 7/6/2005 T MOBILE 44.91
AP - 00225021 7/6/2005 T MOBILE 44.91
AP - 00225022 7/6/2005 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 2,126.15
AP - 00225022 7/6/2005 TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC, DAVID 186.29 J~
User:VLOPEZ-VeronicaLopez Page: 10 Current Date: 07/137200'~'~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225023 7/6/2005 TEPPER, ROBERT 130.00
AP - 00225025 7/6/2005 THOMSON GALE 54.16
AP - 00225025 7/6/2005 THOMSON GALE 175.05
AP - 00225025 7/6/2005 THOMSON GALE 95.23
AP - 00225026 7/6/2005 TIME WARNER TELECOM 3,427.23
AP - 00225027 7/6/2005 TOMARK SPORTS 1NC 852.43
AP - 00225028 7/6/2005 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 6,184.30
AP - 00225028 7/6/2005 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,675.40
AP 00225028 7/6/2005 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 5,428.94
AP 00225030 7/6/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,649.28
AP 00225030 7/6/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,090.96
AP 00225030 7/6/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 13,555.36
AP 00225030 7/6/2005 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,350.00
AP 00225031 7/6/2005 TYPECARE 55.00
AP 00225032 7/6/2005 UNDERGROLrND TECHNOLOGY INC 650.45
AP - 00225032 7/6/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 461.25
AP - 00225032 7/6/2005 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 470.80
AP - 00225034 7/6/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR Pr 2,764.33
AP - 00225034 7/6/2005 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 32,479.33
AP - 00225035 7/6/2005 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INC 1,668.08
AP - 00225035 7/6/2005 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INC 477.42
AP - 00225036 7/6/2005 UPS 61.49
AP - 00225037 7/6/2005 URENDO, ALFONSO 40.00
AP - 00225038 7/6/2005 VALERO, LESLEY 40.00
AP - 00225039 7/6/2005 VEND U CO 75.90
AP - 00225040 7/6/2005 VENTURA, MIKE 36.00
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 86.39
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 574.95
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 467.75
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 52.73
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 56.85
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 31.48
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 1,291.52
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 64.58
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 133.23
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 47.41
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 48.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 467.75
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.87
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 179.91
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 153.96
AP ~ 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 59.73
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 89.58
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 162.21
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.31
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 27.85
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 44.97
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 86.59
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.24
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 85.38
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86 ll
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 07/137200
Report:CK AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.85
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.78
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP ~ 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 31.15
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VEKIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.78
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.85
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 584.23
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 781.44
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 347.90
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 141.27
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 V£RIZON 28.47
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 497.69
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 116.66
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 393.62
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 27.64
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 39.38
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 39.38
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 24.71
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 31.41
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VEKIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 93.64
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 90.73
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 30.03
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.91
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.22
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 57.45
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 322.90
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 29.86
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 413.44
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 150.45
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 28.86
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 89.13
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.13
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VEPdZON 92.16
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 92.16
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VEKIZON 90.79
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 467.75
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 206.98
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 0{/1~0
Report:CK_AGENDA_KEG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 83.37
AP - 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 42.85
AP ~ 00225044 7/6/2005 VERIZON 78.06
AP - 00225046 7/6/2005 VERIZON 142.50
AP - 00525047 7/6/2005 VERIZON 1,172.93
AP - 00225048 7/6/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 32.33
AP - 00225048 7/6/2005 VIDEO GUYS, THE 103.88
AP - 00225049 7/6/2005 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 400.00
AP - 00225050 7/6/2005 VISTA PAINT 608.04
AP - 00225050 7/6/2005 VISTA PAINT 562.53
AP - 00225050 7/6/2005 VISTA PAINT 270.24
AP - 00225051 7/6/2005 VUONG, ANNIE 68.00
AP - 00225052 7/6/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 10.12
AP - 00225052 7/6/2005 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 211.86
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,129.39
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 67.13
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 982.93
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 180.98
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 150.85
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 244.09
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 217.98
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 875.92
AP - 00225053 7/6/2005 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 934.19
AP - 00225054 7/6/2005 WEATH1NGTON, CHANEL 250.00
AP - 00225055 7/6/2005 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 26.47
AP - 00225056 7/6/2005 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 64.68
AP - 00225057 7/6/2005 WEST ROCK LLC 5,750.00
AP - 00225057 7/6/2005 WEST ROCK LLC 10,350.00
AP - 00225058 7/6/2005 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 498.34
AP - 00225059 7/6/2005 WlLLDAN ASSOCIATES 10,500.00
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO 1NC 2,975.63
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 5,848.02
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO 1NC 1,477.88
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO 1NC 2,622.00
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 6,448.51
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,462.61
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 8,331.77
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,053.43
AP - 00225060 7/6/2005 WSA US GUARDS CO INC 1,564.14
AP - 00225061 7/6/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 10,594.45
AP - 00225061 7/6/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 10,594.45
AP - 00225061 7/6/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 34.93
AP - 00225061 7/6/2005 XEROX CORPOP~TION 34.93
AP - 00225061 7/6/2005 XEROX CORPORATION 929.35
AP - 00225062 7/6/2005 ZEE MEDICAL INC 107.75
AP - 00225063 7/6/2005 ZEREHI, HADI 500.00
AP - 00225064 7/6/2005 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00225065 7/6/2005 AMERICAN BODY ARMOR & EQUIPMENT INC. 283.50
AP - 00225065 7/6/2005 AMERICAN BODY ARMOR & EQUIPMENT INC. 189.00
AP - 00225066 7/6/2005 BRUNER, MELVIN 400.00
AP - 00225067 ' 7/6/2005 CFIAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 4,347.60
AP - 00225068 7/6/2005 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00225069 7/6/2005 DELEISE, JENAE 519.24 m,
AP - 00225070 7/6/2005 HEIL, MICHAEL 900.00
User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date: 0~13/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
6/30/2005 through 7/12/2005
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00225072 7/6/2005 LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL 4,135.00
AP - 00225073 7/6/2005 MURADIAN, LESLIE 200.00
AP - 00225073 7/6/2005 MURADIAN, LESLIE 200.00
AP - 00225074 7/6/2005 NATIONAL DEFERRED 15,583.35
AP - 00225075 7/6/2005 PARSAC 68,006.00
AP - 00225075 7/6/2005 PARSAC 91,752.00
AP - 00225075 7/6/2005 PARSAC 60,456.00
AP - 00225076 7/6/2005 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERViCES [NC 6.81
AP 00225077 7/6/2005 RWB PARTY PROPS INC 584.55
AP 00225080 7/6/2005 SCWMF 25.00
AP 00225081 7/6/2005 SHERMAN CLIENT TRUST ACCT, CRAIG A 75,000.00
AP 00225082 7/6/2005 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 277.10
AP 00225083 7/6/2005 UNITED WAY 46.00
AP 00225084 7/6/2005 USPS/PITNEY BOWES 30,000.00
AP 00225085 7/6/2005 VISION SERViCE PLAN CA 8,145.36
AP 00225086 7/12/2005 U S DEPARTMENT OF STATE 60.00
Total for Check ID AP: 1,431,058.84
Total for Entity: 1,431,058.84
User: VLOPEZ- Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 0~/1J/200
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 17:37:2
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER
ORGANIZATION (AYSO) REGION 65 FOR A WAIVER OF FEES AND
CHARGES FOR USE OF THE SOCCER FIELDS AT THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA EPICENTER ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX ON SEPTEMBER
10, 2005 FOR THEIR PICTURE DAY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a request from the American Youth
Soccer Organization (AYSO) Region 65 for waiver of fees and charges for use of the
soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Adult Sports Complex on September 10,
2005, for their picture day.
BACKGROUND
At the request of staff, for the past 4 years AYSO Region 65 has held their annual picture
day activity at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex rather than at
our community parks to better accommodate the influx of over two thousand youngsters
and their families at this event. We believe that this location better serves the needs of
AYSO youth, their parents and residents of Rancho Cucamonga in terms of location,
parking and traffic flow. Since 2001, the City Council has approved AYSO's request for a
waiver of fees and charges for the use of the soccer fields at the Epicenter for their picture
day. It is staff's assessment that this arrangement worked well for all parties. The event
has proceeded smoothly and there has been no disruption to the community.
CITY COUNCIL
AYSO REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER FOR USE OF EPICENTER SOCCER FIELDS FOR THEIR PICTURE DAY
JULY 20, 2005
Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve this year's request for a waiver
of fees and charges for ^YSO for use of the Epicenter Adult Sports Complex soccer fields
on September 10, 2005, for their picture day.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Epicenter soccer fields are traditionally rented out to community groups for a cost of
$265.00 per field per day. There are no direct fees/charges associated with this event.
Therefore, should the Council approve this request for a waiver of fees the total fiscal
impact to the City for this action would be $530.00. AYSO would still be required to provide
certification of their $1 million comprehensive public liability insurance as well as a
refundable damage/security deposit in the amount of $200.00.
Kevin
Comr~ ~nity Services Director
hlOOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCounciAStaffRepo~ts~2OO5~AYSOFeeWaiver6.20. O5. doc
-2-
R A N C H O C u c A M O N G A
C 0 Mi~l U N ITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department, the Park
Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering and the Planning Division. This
report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only. No action need be taken
on this item.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Central Park:
· A Certificate of Occupancy was issued on May 21, 2005. Contractor continuing to work on
punch list items.
Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project:
· Site accepted by park landscape maintenance.
Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Project:
· Building construction proceeding well. Theater- Continuing to set and weld theater steel.
Lobby slab on grade installed. Event Center - Working on exterior wall framing. Library -
Working on framing overhead rough in for the Ist and 2"d floors. Working on framing the
interior wails.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Victoria Arbors Park:
· Maintenance period underway. Anticipate acceptance by park landscape maintenance in
early August.
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail:
· Grove to Base Line: City to start construction in Fiscal Year 2005/06 on widening of
Foothill Boulevard, including installing a new bridge where Pacific Electric crosses
Foothill Boulevard. Engineering staff is working on grant application under the state's
Bicycle Transportation Account funding to design and construct.
· Base Line Road to Amethyst: Planning staff has applied for Safe Route to School funds
for the Base Line Road to Amethyst reach.
· Amethyst to Archibald: Funded with $272,000 in state's Bicycle Transportation Account
money and local matching funds (beautification fees). Construction bid of $692,000 is
higher than available funding; therefore, City Council rejected bids on June 15, and
directed staff to combine with Archibald to Haven segment.
· Archibald to Haven: SANBAG approved $954,900 in Transportation Development Act
Funds (Article 3). Design and construction in Fiscal Year 2005/06.
· Haven to 1200' east of Etiwanda Avenue: Funded with $3.7 million federal STE grant
money and local matching funds (beautification fees). City's environmental consultant,
LSA Associates, Inc. is working on a response to Caltrans corrections to various
environmental documents to obtain the federal environmental clearance. This is a crucial
step that is required before we can get our allocation of the grant funding,
· Construction: Two short segments of the trail have been constructed in Rancho
Cucamonga along Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard in conjunction with the
construction of Central Park Phase I and Day Creek Fire Station, respectively. Both of
these are "re-routes" to new signalized crossings of these busy streets.
· Interim Use: The Planning Department and City Attorney have almost concluded
negotiations with Joseph Filippi Winery on an agreement that would allow Winery to
plant vineyards as an interim use down the middle of the railroad corridor. SANBAG,
who owns the corridor, requires that the middle 45 feet be reserved for future transit.
· The Rancho Cucamonqa Community Foundation on October 13, 2004, approved use of
their non-profit organization to become a donation collector for this important trail project.
To date we have raised $646 in donations,
· Non-Profit Orqanization: The Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail have formed a 501(c)3
non-profit organization and is working on a newsletter.
· Business Involvement: Outdoor recreation retailer REI has expressed a strong desire to
suppor[ this trail project through their community service program of volunteers who do
trail construction and maintenance. At REI's Tour de Rancho bike ride event held April 3,
2005 staff manned a booth with information about Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail.
REI store employees have nominated the trail for grant funding and staff has submitted
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
the grant application in conjunction with the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail. On the
basis of our grant application, REI corporate office has invited us to also submit a
nomination for a $20,000 REI Stewards for the Environment Award.
· Marketinq: The Planning Department and the Community Services Marketing Manager
have met with REI's special events specialist to brainstorm ideas for events promoting
the trail. If REI awards their grant, a special event could be held at their store. A charity
shopping night could be held in conjunction with REI's movie night where REI would
donate a percentage of their sales profits to the trail. Another idea is to film a
promotional video, which could include interviews at the City's first groundbreaking or
grand opening ceremony that could be shown as a public service announcement on
RCTV3.
Efiwanda Railway Station Property:
The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan identifies the station as a high priority
"signature trailhead". The Engineering Department has begun using the station property for
public works maintenance activities.
· Site Clean-up: Work completed, including demolition of accessory structures. Next
phase will be the historic depot building, pending funding availability, starting with
repairing roof, then environmental clean-up (e.g., removal of asbestos, lead paint, and
mold).
· Etiwanda Depot: A structural engineer has inspected the depot and is preparing a report
on needed work. Burglar alarms have been installed in the station building; however,
there are no fire sprinklers in the building. Engineering Department has estimated it
would cost approximately $253,000, including fire sprinklers, to bring station up to code
for occupancy by Public Works staff. $50,000 in Community Development Block Grant
construction funds approved in FY2004-05, mostly for demolition of accessory structures
on property. Mayor and staff met with restaurateur who is interested in leasing Station
building for an upscale steakhouse; however, before going any further, City Council
policy discussion needed regarding desired uses for property. If City wishes to sublease
Station, or a portion thereof, to a commercial business, then a Request for Proposals
should be issued.
· Alternative Land Use Concepts: The Planning Department has hired a design consultant
to draw three alternative schemes for the entire 4 +/- acre site to provide the basis for
consideration.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Programs and Services:
· Ice Cream Social & Karaoke, Wednesday, July 20, 1:30 p.m. Join us for an afternoon of ice
cream and all your favorite toppings. Don't be afraid to step behind the microphone sing
your favorite songs.
· Antique Road Show, Saturday, August 20, 2005, 9:00 a.m. We have our own version of the
popular television show. Bring that old vase or childhood toy that's collecting dust and get it
appraised by an antique expert. Registration taken at the door! Call (909) 477-2780 for
more information.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
· Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, September 26,
9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center.
Trips and Tours:
,, Kinq Tutankhamun's Exhibition, Saturday, July 23 & Saturday, August 27. Join us as we
visit the first United States venue and the only west coast showing of King Tutankhamun's
Treasures. We will battle the traffic and parking for you in our deluxe motorcoach. King
Tut's treasures will go on display for the first time in 27 years featuring the ancient ruler's
gold crown, carved dagger and a massive gold and cloisonn6 necklace, "Tutankhamun and
the Golden Age of the Pharaoh" will include about 130 of the 5,000 Egyptian artifacts found
in King Tut's tomb and additional ancient sites. After we see the treasures we will stop a
Lawry's for lunch (inc!uded in trip price). Cost: $77.00 per person.
Human Services:
The Doctor Is In: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. will present the following lectures at the Brulte
Senior Center in July and August:
Thyroid: Is it under active thyroid disease? - Tuesday, July 19, 2005, 12:00 p.m.
Are you forgetful? Is it Alzheimer's? - Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 7:00 p.m.
Facial Hair & Women: What's happening? - Tuesday, August 16, 2005, 12:00 p.m.
Back pain: Is it serious? - Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 7:00 p.m.
· Health Screeninq: Free health assessments are conducted by nurses from the San
Bernardino County Department of Public Health to individuals 60 years and better, and
included the following: health history, pulse, blood pressure, height, weight, hemoglobin
and blood sugar. Counseling and referrals were also available. The next health screening
will be on Tuesday, August 9, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., at the James L. Brulte
Senior Center.
· USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible
residents at the James L. Brulte Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the size
of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis. There is
a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and income
are required.
· USDA Food Commodities: The San Bernardino County Food Bank, along with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, distributes surplus food on the first Monday of every month to eligible
residents at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Eligibility is based on income and the
size of the household. Distribution begins at 1:30 pm on a first come, first served basis.
There is a homebound delivery program for the physically disabled. Proof of residency and
income are required. Our next distribution date will be: Monday, August Ist .
Mini-Resource Directory: The Human Services Division has created a Rancho Cucamonga
Community Services Mini-Resource Guide for the Inland Empire. The following
programs/services will be included: Abuse & Domestic Violence, Addiction Treatment., Anti-
Gang Programs, Basic Needs & Emergency Assistance, Children & Youth, Consumer
Information, Counseling & Mental Health, Education & Literacy, Employment &
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Volunteering, Family Planning & Parenting, Health & Medical Services, Hotlines, Housing,
Legal Assistance and Senior Services.
Volunteer Services:
· The table below summarizes the community Services Department volunteer usaqe for the
month of May 2005, and the totals from September 2004 through May 2005:
CSD Month: May 2005 September-May 2005
# of # of # of# of
Division Volunteers Hours $ Value' Volunteers Hours $ Value'
Senior Services 861 716 10,024 536 5,837 81,718
Human Services 3£ 106 1,484 369 1,349 18,886
Sports 9:' 660 9,240 1,015 15,536 217,504
Special Events 2,~ 106 1,484 109 477 6,678
Performing Arts 7 14 196 78 566 7,924
Teens 5~ 336 4,704 496 2,829 39,606
Youth Programs 2 72 1,008 8 175 2,450
~,dministration 15 21 £ 45 135 1,89¢
Totals 30; 2,025 28,35{~ 2,656 26,904 376,656
Based on rate of $14/hr.
Teens:
· The table below summarizes teen pmqram attendance for the month of June 2005:
Program/Activity Attendance - June 2005
Teen Center 940
Spruce Skate Facility 1,090
TRAC - Snack Bars 67
TI[AC - Babysitting 79 participants; 13 volunteers
Teen Connection/Summer Volunteen 102
Connection
· Teen Center - June was a busy month. School ended and the teens celebrated by getting
loose and having fun at the teen center. A variety of activities and competitions were
planned; Basketball shootout, Capture the Flag, Freeze Tag, Indoor Soccer, Frisbee
Football, Volleyball, and the ever so popular Dodgeball Tournament. To keep the teens
energy levels up they were provided with free treats; donuts, ice cream, chips & salsa, ice
cream floats, and the popular peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Summer hours are
Monday - Thursday from 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. and Friday from 11:00 a.m. until 8:00
p.m.
· Upcomin,q Teen Activities - Teen trips begin with Universal Studios on July 20th followed by
Pharaoh's Lost Kingdom on July 27~'.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
· The Spruce Skate Park - Staff meets with teens using the facility on the second Thursday of
the month. Items discussed generally include: park issues, new safety information, laws
and upcoming major events in other cities.
REAL Hi.qh School Advisory Committee - The REAL committee (acronym for Rancho
Cucamonga, Etiwanda, Alta Loma and Los Osos high schools) began discussing potential
special events for High School Students. The committee consists of 10 students from the
following High Schools A.S.B. (Associated Student Body): Etiwanda High School, Los Osos
High School, and Rancho High School and Alta Loma High School. Upcoming meetings are
scheduled for August.
· Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) - June starts the summer season of snack bars. The
ALHS snack bar began June 20 and is going very well. The concerts and movies begin in
July. The teens will be busy five days a week and four nights a week. This is their major
fund raising season.
· The TRAC Babysittinq program continues to grow. Parents are very comfortable with the
supervision and enjoy this program because it has a lot to offer, crafts, games, movies,
snacks and plenty of fun. It allows the parent's and their children an affordable night c~ut on
the town.
· Summer Volunteen Connection - This program allows young teens an opportunity to learn
job skills. Teens are required to complete an application, go through an interview and if
accepted into the program must attend a mandatory training. They are responsible for time
cards and assisting in the programs they have been assigned. At the end of their
assignment they receive a performance evaluation and certificate of completion.
Youth Activities:
· The table below summarizes youth pro.qram attendance for the month of June 2005:
Program/Activity Classes/Sites Re~listrants Attendance
Playschool Classes 51/4 686 14,350
Play Camp 56/3 821 7,263
Camp Cucamonga 9/1 702 5,112
Mobile Recreation 5 parks N/A 97
Lewis Partnership - 2 Sites - N/A 547
Kids Club Evergreen & Del
Mar Apartments
· Playschool Summary - Playschool 2004/2005 session will end Friday, June 3, 2005.
Playschool 2005/2006 will begin September 6, 2005.
~, Play Camp - 2005 Play Camp for children ages 1 - 5 runs Monday, June 27 - Friday August
19, 2005. Play Camp is located at Lions Center East and West and the Goldy S. Lewis
Community Center. Play Camp participant will enjoy arts and crafts, meeting new friends,
out door recreation play, learn socialization skills and build on large and small motor skills.
· Camp Cucamon.qa - 2005 Camp Cucamonga for children ages 5-12 at Alta Loma High
School began on Monday, June 20, 2005. Camp is nine (9) weeks long and will end Friday,
August 19, 2005. Participants will enjoy themed activity weeks, swimming on Tuesday and
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Thursday and exciting field trips on Wednesday along with arts and crafts, games, sports
and organized activities. Our Playschool 2005/2006 session will begin on September 6,
2005.
· Lewis Partnership Proqram - The summer has begun and has gone smoothly. June was by
far our best month with 547 participants. Kids Club celebrated the end of the school year
with Picnic Days at all 4 sites, with a huge picnic on June 16th at Terra Vista including tug at
war and potato sac races. Upcoming Lewis events include:
> 7/9 - Lewis Open House
> 7/15 and 7/22 - Movie Days
> 7/8, 7/12, 7/20, 7/28, 7/5, 7/15, 7/20 and 7/26 - Pool Days
> 7/8 and 7/22 - Friday Night Live
· Youngsters participating in the Mobile Recreation ProRram, "Fun on the Run" cannot wait to
do all the fun games and crafts that have been planned for each park. Ninety-seven (97)
children attended our Mobile Recreation program during the month of May.
Fun on the Run's summer session will run July 5th through August 26th from 11:00 am until
3:00 p.m. at the following parks:
Weekday Park Location
Monday Bear Gulch Park
Tuesday Hermosa Park
Wednesday Old Town Park
Thursday Heritage Park
Friday Windrows Park
Youth Sports:
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Aquatics 675 6months-adult N/A
Pee Wee Baseball 620 3-5/boys & girls 62
Youth Basketball 935 6-16/boys & girls 104
Youth Basketball Camp 40 8-14/boys & girls N/A
Youth Soccer Camp 40 8-14/boys & girls N/A
Youth Sports Camp - RC Family 160 6-12/boys & girls N/A
Sports Center
Youth Sports Camp - CMS 100 6-12/boys & girls N/A
Northtown Youth Basketball 59 6-17/boys & girls 6
Northtown Play Camp 23 6-13/boys & girls N/A
Cucamonga Middle School 80 8-adult N/A
(CMS) Judo
Cucamonga Middle School 140 8-14/boys & girls 14
(CMS) Youth Basketball Practice
RC Family Sports Center:
o The table on the following page provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the
reporting period:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Activity # Participants
Adult Basketball 414
Youth Basketball 856
Adult Racquetball 399
Youth Racquetball 80
Adult Volleyball 34
Youth Volleyball 16
Jazzercise 1,350
· The table below summarizes organized Adult Activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Racquetball 24 Adult/Male & Females N/A
Basketball (full court) 180 Adult/Males 18
Basketball (3-on-3) 60 Adult/Males 12
Adult Sports:
· The table below summarizes adult sport activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,640 165 Males/Females
Football 50 5 Males
Soccer 672 42 Males/Females
Tennis 36 N/A Males/Females
· There are four (4) adult softball tournaments scheduled for the month of July at the
Epicenter and Adult Sports Park.
Sports Advisory Committee:
· The next meeting of the Sports Advisory Committee will take place on August 11
Special Events:
· On Monday, July 4th, Community Services hosted our annual Fireworks Spectacular at the
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter with our sold out crowd of over 6,600 people. Stadium gates
opened at 7:00 p.m. with our live entertainment beginning at 7:30 p.m.
Mishon Ratliff, 13 years old, was our first performer. Mishon made his stage debut two years
ago on Steve Harvey's Apollo West. Jordyn Taylor, a 15 year old who has been singing and
dancing for most of her life was our second performer. She recently was crowned Miss
Young Inland Empire and Miss Teen Hollywood. Next performers were Showstoppers; a
group of 10 performers ranging in ages from 8 to 15 who perform & practice at our
Temporary Theatre Arts Center here in Rancho Cucamonga. JuST 3 performed our national
anthem. JuST 3 consist of three talented singer/songwriter/dancers from Southern
California. Each young lady has professional credits to her name and together they have
performed at numerous sporting and charity events. We also had an appearance by
Shakers Dance Team.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
At 9:00 p.m. we began our "Lights of Freedom" Fireworks Spectacular. Our show was over
18 minutes long and was truly amazing.
Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Toppinq Off Party - On Friday, July 15th, the Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center Topping Off Party will be taking place in the East Parking Structure
from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. There will an exclusive construction site hard- hat tour for donors
of $1,000 and above. Autograph singing of the last steel beam while on the hard-hat tour will
be for our Spotlight Donors ($5,000 and above). From 5:30 p.m. until to 7:00 p.m. we will
have updates of the project, announcements, hors d'oeuvres, champagne toasts,
entertainment and the official "Topping Off' of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center.
Concerts in the Park - Join us for an evening under the stars with our Concerts in the Park
series beginning on July 7th and running through August 25th on Thursday evenings at 7:00
p.m. at the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. This summer's lineup for bands include:
~' July 7th The Silverados (Country)
> July 14th Steve Copeland and Raging Sun (Jazz/Blues)
~' July 21st The Beatless (Rock and Roll)
> July 28th Jumpin Joz Band (Swing)
> August 4th LA Lyon (Top 40s)
> August 11th Upstream (Calypso/Reggae)
> August 18th Ronny & the Classics (Oldies)
> August 25th The Answer (Classic Rock)
Food will also be available for purchase beginning at 6:00 p.m. Join us for dinner at the Park
and enjoy everything from BBQ to Mexican, then settle in for the concerts with your funnel
cake and kettle corn!
Movies in the Park - Movies begin the week of July 11th and will continue through August
19th. This summer's lineup for movies includes: Shrek 2 (PG), Willy Wonka & the Chocolate
Factory (G), Racing Stripes (PG), The Wizard of Oz (G), Shark Tale (PG), The Sponge Bob
Squarepants Movie (PG).
~' *Mondays Central Park
> *Tuesdays Chaffey Town Square at Victoria Gardens
~' Wednesdays Windrows Park
> Fridays Red Hill Park
*New days & park locations!
All movies begin at dusk. Snacks will be available for purchase courtesy of our Teen
Recreation Activity Club (T.R.A.C.) at Central Park, Windrows Park, & Red Hill Park. In the
warmth of the summer nights ... grab your blankets and lawn chairs and enjoy our fantastic
flicks with the entire family.
Victoria Arbors Park OpeninR - Currently we are looking at Saturday, August 13~h' as a
tentative date for Victoria Arbors Park Opening. Join us for activities, which may include:
ribbon cutting ceremony, inflatables, food, activities, and giveaways. As the date comes
closer we will have more details and a set date.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Cultural and Performing Arts:
* After six weeks of rehearsals the 80+ community members, who make up the cast and crew,
will finally take the stage at Los Osos High School Theatre to present the City's summer
musical "Cinderella." Directors Barbara Hinrichsen, Melanie Alpert and Mark Gamez have
crafted a wonderful and whimsical presentation featuring the lovely music of Rodgers and
Hammerstein accompanied by elegant and fanciful costumes and sets. This production
marks the City's 9t~ community theatre production and the second presented at Los Osos
High School. Performances are scheduled for: July 15, 15, 17, 22, 23, & 24. Tickets are $10
general admission and $8 for senior citizens and children. The summer musical generally
attracts over 2,500 audience members of all ages.
e The City's Theatre Arts program and Chaffey College Fine Arts and Theatre Arts
Departments have collaborated for the third year to offer an arts-focused summer day camp,
Creative Camp 4 Creative Kids Pm.qram, for youngsters, ages 8 through 12 years.
Youngsters meet at the Chaffey College Wignall Museum/Gallery beginning at 8:00 a.m. to
begin their day of visual and performing arts experiences. Morning activities focus on visual
arts instruction and projects, while the afternoon session explores theatre arts with
exercises, theatre games and rehearsal for a final performance. The week concludes with a
stage presentation at the Chaffey College Theatre for family and friends, followed by
exhibition of the student's artwork in the Gallery. The weeklong program meets Monday
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. and is offered for four weeks throughout June and
July. Program fee is $150 per week. This summer's program met maximum enrollment of
20 students per week for all four weeks, with a growing waiting list. The City and College
plan to expand the maximum next summer to accommodate more art-curious youth.
Parks and Facilities:
· The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities
for the month of June 2005:
Park/Shelter Attendance # Applications # Rentals Hours of Use
Red Hill 4,092 56 86 266
Heritage 2,614 40 52 192
Milliken 1,240 31 36 156
Hermosa 717 17 20 60
Coyote Canyon 275 8 12 35
Civic Center 80 1 1 7
Courtyard
Amphitheatre 110 3 3 11
TOTAL 9,128 156 210 727
Equestrian Participants* 155 4 6 14
Spectators: 0
* Equestdan participants include drop-in use.
· The table below and on the next page displays buildinq rental and recreation contract class
attendance numbers for the month of June 2005:
Activity Program Number Attendance
Lions East Rentals 74 bookings 770
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Activity Program Number Attendance
Lions East Building 272 facility hours 6,200
Lions West Rentals 244 bookings 6,755
Lions West Building 531 facility hours 12,312
Lewis Center Rentals 28 3,461
Lewis Center Building 164 facility hours 6,922
Contract Classes 261 classes 2,747 -
(Summer session) registered
participants;
23,893 -
attendance
· Central Park rentals began on Saturday, July 2"d. Community interest in holding meetings,
events and special occasions at Central has proven to be even stronger than anticipated.
· Our recreation contract class pmqram is seeing consistent growth due to new residents and
new class sites and moms. The Class program is maintaining a high level of quality
instructors and classes to meet all the needs of our participants. Our summer session of
classes runs from June 18th through August 26th. Some of the new classes offered this
session include: Music Pups, Gmovin' Guitar, Bubble Maker Scuba, Red Hot Robots, Little
Bitty Workshops, Violin, Balance/Stability Ball Fitness, Youth and Adult Scuba and Just
Desserts Cooking.
· Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address
maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and
supportive of the City's efforts.
· Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in
need of assistance.
Departmental / City Marketing:
· Marketing efforts continue being developed and implemented for the promotion of the
Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and the Promotinq Arts and Literacy fundraisin.q
Campaiqn.
A direct mail campaign to educators from Covina to Colton was sent out late March with a
goal to receive on-line survey responses regarding programming, schedules and outcomes
at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center.
A drawing was held June 1st for the first winners in our promotion; two teachers from the
Etiwanda School District and a teacher from a parochial school in Ontario were drawn as
winners of the $250 gift certificate to CM School Supply, $200 gift certificate to "lucy" at
Victoria Gardens and a $100 gift certificate to Victoria Gardens. An electronic
announcement to the educators that responded to the survey was sent out with photos of
the winners.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
The City E-News announcement to obtain "opt-in" subscribers to add to our Victoria
Gardens Cultural Center subscriber database for news and updates on the project was
launched in April.
· Marketing for the Dedication of the Central Park Phase 1 project held on May 21st
consisted of utilizing the Grapevine, street banners, RCTV, fliers, and electronic
announcements to those subscribers of the Central Park Newsletter database.
Several pieces of collateral materials were created for the opening of the James L.
Brulte Senior Center and Goldy S. Lewis Community Center.
· Promotion of the new programs offered with the launching of the Theatre Arts Academy
was done through press releases and announcements in conjunction with the
Community Theatre Production "The World Goes 'Round".
· A launch of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Cimle of Friends" promoting volunteering
for the Friends of the Library and two new "Friends" volunteer groups: The Friends of
the Playhouse - to create an influx of new Volunteers to these three wonderful groups.
An Orientation for the interested community members will be coordinated to provide
information and sign-up interested parties.
· Marketing efforts were developed and implemented for promotion of the 4th of July
Fireworks Spectacular at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. This year we will be
offering tickets available for purchase on-line via a link from RCpark.com to the Quakes
ticketing system in addition to Epicenter Box Office and telephone sales, in order to
provide another avenue of customer friendly, 24/7, service for our community.
· March, April and May of 2005, saw "Hits" on the RCpark.com website of: 1.3 million, 1.1
million and 1.4 million respectively. One individual Visitor on the site can generate
multiple "Hits" as each page they review is registered as a "Hit". This is a milestone
mark, as this is the first consecutive three-month period with "Hits" over 1 million.
Epicenter Marketing:
· A mailing of over two hundred production companies in the entertainment industry was
completed, promoting the Epicenter Stadium for location shoots. Recipients were
offered tickets to enjoy a Quakes Game while at the same time they could scout the
location site for potential filming uses.
· Staff had the opportunity to capture a large corporate picnic event facility rental with
diqital photoqraphs with the renters' permission to use those photographs in future
marketing materials. Staff will continue to utilize events at the Stadium that will provide a
"snapshot" to potential renters for various rental uses.
Epicenter Rentals/Activities:
· The following activities/rentals took place during the reporting period:
> City - 4th of July Celebration - July 4, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium and Complex.
> Quakes/Principal - Family Fun Fest - July 6, 2005 - Epicenter Softball Fields and
Exterior Concourse Area.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
> National Adult Baseball Association - Champion Games - July 9, 2005 - Epicenter
Stadium.
> Diamond King Showcase - Champion Games- July 13, 2005 - Epicenter Stadium.
Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming rentals and activities:
AY$O - Picture Day - September 10, 2005 - Epicenter Soccer Fields.
WFS Financial - Used Car Sale - September 21-26, 2005 - Epicenter Special Event
Area.
Water of Life Church - Anniversary Service & Concert - October 9, 2005 - Epicenter
Stadium.
Rotary Club of Rancho Cucamonga - Festival & Go Cart Races - October 22, 2005 -
Epicenter Special Event Area.
Christian Okoye Foundation - Youth Holiday Event and 5/10K Run - December 10,
2005 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B and City streets.
>Freedom Films - Feature Filming - February/March 2006 - Epicenter Stadium.
>'Aray Artist - Music Festival - May 2006 - Epicenter Stadium.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meetinq of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday, July
21,2005. The following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon at this meeting:
Update on the Senior Advisory Committee.
Update on the Sports Advisory Committee.
Update on Central Park.
Quarterly update on Departmental programming
Review of proposed fees changes.
Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project.
Appointment to various Commission Subcommittees.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
A special meetinq on the Foundation Board of Directors is scheduled for Tuesday, July 19,
2005. The following items are scheduled to be reviewed/discussed at this meeting:
~ Approval of sponsorship funding fo'r the Community Services Department's production of
"The World Goes Round".
~' Consideration of sponsorship of volunteers for the "Mark Christopher Charity Classic -
Presented by Adelphia" to be held September 12-18, 2005.
Approval of a Resolution to supercede Resolution Number 88-004A, which will amend
the list of officers authorized to order the deposit and withdrawal of monies in the Local
Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) for the Ranch Cucamonga Community Foundation.
Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center project.
Update on programming plan for the Lewis Family Playhouse.
Review and discussion of fundraising activities.
Update on Promoting Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign events.
Discussion regarding future Gala program.
Update on additional Lewis Family Playhouse Initiatives.
Review and approval of the Foundation's Fiscal Year 2005-2006 annual operating
budget.
~' Election of Officers for the Community Foundation for the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year.
Mayor and Members of the City Council
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
July 20, 2005
Kevin McArdle J~e O'Neil , er
Community Services Director City Engineer ~City Planner
I:lCOMMSERV~Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffRepo~tsl2OO5~update7.20. O5. doc
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRe rt
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Approval of a payment in the amount of $4,315,000 to the County of San
Bernardino Flood Control District that will serve to transfer the Regional
Mainline Drainage Fees collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as
provided for in Agreement No. CO-02-139 to meet the City's funding
obligation for the Upper Etiwanda Creek Improvement Project, and approval
of an appropriation of $4,315,000 to Account No. 11143035650/1358-0 from
the Drainage Etiwanda/San Sevaine (Fund 114) fund balance
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve a payment in the amount of $4,315,000 to the
County of San Bernardino Flood Control District that will serve to transfbr the Regional
Mainline Drainage Fees collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as provided for in
Agreement No. CO-02-139 to meet the City's funding obligation for the Upper Etiwanda
Creek Improvement Project, and approve an appropriation of $4,315,000 to Account No.
11143035650/1358-0 from the Drainage Etiwanda/San Sevaine (Fund 114) fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of
Drainage Report on February 2, 1989 and thereafter on August 16, 1989 adopted a
resolution establishing a drainage fee over the same Master Plan Drainage Area. The
purpose of the fee is to provide funding for the regional flood control improvement of Upper
Etiwanda Creek and San Sevaine Creek systems to provide regional flood protection for
the easterly portion of the City.
The County of San Bernardino Flood Control District is the lead agency for the
Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System Project, of which the Upper Etiwanda
Creek Improvement Project is a part. The total cost of the project is expected to exceed
$120 million and the funding for the project is to be provided from a combination of federal
grants, federal loans, County of San Bemardino Flood Control District funds, City of Ontario
3!
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF THE TRANSFER OF REGIONAL MAINLINE FEES TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE UPPER ETIWANDA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS
JULY 20, 2005
PAGE 2
funds, City of Fontana funds, and City of Rancho Cucamonga funds. The City of Rancho
Cucamonga's funding obligation was established within the agreement (CO-02-139)
executed by the City and the District on January 28, 2003. This agreement stipulates that
the City will convey and/or deposit with the District all Regional Mainline Drainage fees
collected to date by the City and future drainage fees for the District's use in the design and
construction of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System Project.
The District recently awarded a construction contract for construction of the Upper
Etiwanda Creek improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga city limits.
Construction of the improvements is scheduled to begin in the upcoming weeks and will
continue thereon for the next 16 months. Accordingly, the District has made a formal
request to the City to transfer all Regional Mainline Drainage fees collected to date, less
$500,000 to offset an obligation of the District to pay the City $500,000 for the construction
of related street improvements. As of June 30, 2005, the total fund balance for the account
associated with the Regional Mainline Drainage fees was approximately $4,815,000.
Consequently, after accounting for the aforementioned $500,000 credit, the remaining
balance of $4,315,000 is the amount that must be transferred to the Flood Control District
to comply with the terms of the Agreement.
It is recommended that Council approve a payment in the amount of $4,315,000 to the
County of San Bernardino Flood Control District that will serve to transfer the Regional
Mainline Drainage Fees collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as provided for in
Agreement No. CO-02-139 to meet the City's funding obligation for the Upper Etiwanda
Creek Improvement Project, and approve an appropriation of $4,315,000 to Account No.
11143035650/1358-0 from the Drainage Etiwanda/San Sevaine (Fund 114) fund balance.
Respectfully Submitted,'
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
THE C I ~ Y OF
I~AN C 11 0 CIJ CAI~I O N GA
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
S~: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF GRAND PRIX FIRE DAMAGED FENCING LOCATED
ALONG THE SKYLINE, MONROE CANYON, DAVIS AND HERMOSA
EASEMENT COMMUNITY EQUESTRIAN TRAILS
RECOMMENDATION
The required trail fencing improvements along thc .Skyline, Monroe Canyon, Davis and Hermosa
Easement Community Trails have been completed m an acceptable manner, and it is recommended
that City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faith~l Per£ormance Bond in the amount of
$109,950.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previoas Council action, the bids for the Removal And Replacement O£Grand Prix Fire
Damaged Fencing Located Along The Skyline, Monroe Canyon, Davis And Hermosa Easement
Community Equestrian Trails project were received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder,
Golden State Fence Company. The subject project has been completed in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Landscape Improvements at the above mentioned locations by:
CONTRACTOR: Golden State Fence Company
Release: FaithfulPerformance Bond $109,950.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JB:ju
Attachment
.53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF GRAND PRIX FIRE DAMAGED
FENCING LOCATED ALONG THE SKYLINE, MONROE
CANYON, DAVIS AND HERMOSA EASEMENT
COMMUNITY EQUESTRIAN TRAILS AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Removal and Replacement of
Grand Prix Fire Damaged Fencing Located Along the Skyline, Monroe Canyon, Davis and Hermosa
Easement Community Equestrian Trails have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Beruardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~NGINI~I~I~ I NG DI~PAI~T~II~NT
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City .Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer ~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ,,~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BASE LINE ROAD AT THE 1-15 TRAFFIC AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 03-128 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO
APPROPRIATE $22,000.03 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1283124-0 FROM
TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND
AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $496,330.03
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that'the City Council accept the Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street
Improvements, Contract No. 03-128, as complete, approval to appropriate $22,000.03 to Account
No. 11243035650/1283124-0 from Transportation fund balance, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the
release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $437,437.00 six months after the
recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention
in the amount of $49,633.00, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of
$496,330.03.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street Improvements scope of work performed in
general consisted of installing a traffic signal on Base Line Road at the southbound 1-15 Freeway
on/off ramps, widening Base Line Road in order to provide two (2) westbound left turn lanes,
widening the southbound 1-15 Freeway on and off ramps to provide two (2) lanes, overlaying the
pavement on Base Line Road from East Avenue to a point 1040 feet west of East Avenue, and
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street Improvements
July 20, 2005
Page 2
installing new traffic signs, striping and pavement markers. Pertinent information of the project is as
follows:
> Budgeted Amount: $502,000.00
> Account Numbers: 11243035650/1283124-0
> Engineer's Estimate: $552,170.00
> City Council's Approval to Advertise: October 1, 2003
> Publish dates for local paper: October 7 & 14, 2003
> Bid Opening: November 4, 2003
> Contract Award Date: November 19, 2003
~ Low Bidder: All Amedcan Asphalt
> Contract Amount: $437,437.00
> 10% Contingency: $43,743.00 ·
> Final Contract Amount: $496,330.03
> Difference in Contract Amount: $58,893.03 (13.46%)
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of four (4) contract change orders and
final quantities being higher than estimated contract quantities. Notable overages were Contract
Change Order No. 1 additional cost for the traffic signal pole caused by the delay with the start of
construction and the significant escalation of steel costs. Aisc, Contract Change Order No. 4 was
needed to complete extra work that was requested by the Caltrans inspector. This work included
grinding, repaving and re-striping the southbound on-ramp, miscellaneous electrical work, and
installing guardrail.
Res~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAG/RO:Is .~
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO- 05'~~
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
BASE LINE ROAD AT THE 1-15 TRAFFIC AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 03-128 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Base Line Road at the 1-15 Traffic and Street
Improvements, Contract No. 03-128, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
· work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino
County.
VICINITY MAP
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E NGIN EEI~ lNG DI~pAI~TFIE NT
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~, i~,~'
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techmclan"-~-~;;~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BANYAN STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 05-011 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND
MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF
$243,288.70
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and
Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to Banyan Street, Contract No. 05-011, as
complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance
Bond as a Guarantee Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$252,777.40 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and
authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $24,328.87, 35 days after acceptance. Also,
approve the final contract amount of $243,288.70.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to
Banyan Street scope of work consisted of grading, cold milling, adjustment of all utilities to new
grade, installing a new concrete curb and gutter, retaining curb, sidewalk, driveways, asphalt
concrete pavement, and asphalt rubber hot mix oveday. Pertinent information of the project is as
follows:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Accept Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project
July 20, 2005
Page 2
> Budgeted Amount: $510,000.00
> Account Numbers: 11763035650/1299176-0
~ Engineer's Estimate: $252,945.00
> City Council's Approval to Advertise: December 15, 2004
~ Publish dates for local paper: December 21, 2004 & January 4, 2005
> Bid Opening: January 11,2005
> Contract Award Date: February 2, 2005
> Low Bidder: Silvia Construction, Inc.
~ Contract Amount: $252,777.40
> 10% Contingency: $25,277.74
> Final Contract Amount: $243,288.70
> Difference in Contract Amount: -$9,488.70 (3.75%) (savings)
The net decrease in the total cost'of the project is a result of final quantities being lower than
estimated contract quantities. Most notably during the pre-construction meeting, the Contractor and
staff negotiated at the contractor's request to reduce the crushed aggregate base by substituting
with additional asphalt concrete. However, because of less asphalt removals dudng construction,
the substitution did not increase the quantities of asphalt concrete or asphalt rubber hot mix,
therefore the reduction of crushed aggregate base along with other bid quantity differences with
constructed contract quantities resulted in a net reduction in contract cost despite a contract change
order to rework drive approaches and gates at 6413 Hermosa Avenue (Soehnel property).
Respec. e.e~ully submitted, ' _
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:Is
Attachments
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
HERMOSA AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HIGHLAND
AVENUE TO BANYAN STREET, CONTRACT NO. 05-011
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Hermosa Avenue Street Widening and Pavement
Rehabilitation from Highland Avenue to Banyan Street, Contract No. 05-011, has been
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
I~.RMOS& &VENU~ STREET ]U])ENINO AND PAYEtII~.NT REHABILITATION
mCINiTY M~
R A C HO C U C A M O N G A
~NGIN~I~ING D~PAI~TM~NT
Sti f Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni~ian
SUBJECT': RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 6205444 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $36,674.00, FOR THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-067
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance
Bond No. 6205444 in the amount of $36,674.00 for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety
Lighting at Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, Contract No. 03-067.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Steiny & Company, Inc.
12907 East. Garvey Avenue
P.O. Box 8100
Baldwin Park, CA 91706-0993
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JTH/RO:Is
Attachments
F'i~OJEGT o~,~o ~,,~r~
LOCATION-'~ -: '.'
~ at Arehfbald Avenue and 19 S
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEDARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO.- Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer .
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni/:ian
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. SU 500 6064 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $78,868.00, FOR THE HIGHLAND AVENUE LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-019
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful' Performance
Bond No. SU 500 6064 in the amount of $78,868.00 for the Highland Avenue Landscape
Improvements East of Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 04-019.
I~ACKGROUND/ANALYSlS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the landscape improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Nature Tech Landscaping, Inc.
1760 Marlborough Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Noil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachments
· _/ . . .'.]. ':.' : . ...../LOCATION.
ONTARIO crib' UMIT
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
E N Gl ~ I~ I~ I N G DI~PAI~T~II~N T
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer '
BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~ "5
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techn~c"~,~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 92929 9798 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $15,985.52, FOR THE 2003/2004 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO.
03-068
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. 92929 9798 in the amount of $15,985.52 for the 2003/2004 Local Street
Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 03-068.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Valley Slurry Seal Company
P.O. Box 1620
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:CH/RO:Is
Attachments
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRepor
DALE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16334,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SUBMITTED
BY TRACT 16334
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16334, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and
the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, submitted by Richmond American Homes of
California, Inc.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER Richmond American Homes of California, Inc.
2191 5th Street, Ste. #105
Norco, Ca 92860
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #B21882419 $36,720.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO;tch
Attachment
N
C~ OF ~:~
RANCHO CUCA~0NGA TITL~~
EN~G DIVISION ~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
l~ NGINI~I~DIN G DI~PADT~I~NT
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 14496,
LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY GRANITE HOMES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14496, located north of Wilson Avenue on the west side of Day
Creek Boulevard, submitted by Granite Homes
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
DEVELOPER Granite Homes
1901 Main St., #300
Irvine, Ca 92612
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #B34226989 $33,333.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WdO:tch
Attachment
'BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION
NORTH fl NTS
CITY OF lIEU: Tract~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vici~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
CO~IUNITY c~ I~ I~ VI C E &
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJEC'r: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT AND ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION FOR RJM DESIGN GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF
$152,575 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 11203055300, PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER 46655 AND FOR DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES
IN THE AMOUNT OF $59,755 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER
11203055650/1343120-0, PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 47724 TO BE
FUNDED FROM FUND 120 FUND BALANCE DUE TO CONTRACTOR
RELATED DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED FOR THE
CENTRAL PARK SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT. DELAY
RELATED COSTS WILL BE RECOVERED FROM THE PROJECT
CONTRACTOR.
RECOMMENDATION
To approve the contract amendment and additional appropriation for RJM Design Group
in the amount of $152,575 into Account Number 11203055300, Purchase Order Number
46655 and for Dan Guerra and Associates in the amount of $59,755 into Account
Number 11203055650/1343120-0, Purchase Order Number 47724 to be funded from
Fund 120 Fund Balance due to contractor related delays and additional work required
for the Central Park Senior/Community Center Project.
ANALYSIS
Due to contractor delays on the Rancho Cucamonga Central Park Senior/Community
Center Project and additional work directly attributable to Douglas E. Barnhart, General
Contractor for the project, Project Architects RJM Design Group and Civil Engineering
firm Dan Guerra and Associates have incurred additional costs over and above their
original contracts. In addition, during the construction process, additional construction
related services were required by the City.
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION FOR RJM DESIGN GROUP AND DAN GUERRA
July 20, 2005
Page 2
The sum of the additional charges for RJM Design Group and their sub-consultants is
$152,575. $86,755 is directly attributed to Douglas E. Barnhart due to additional weekly
meetings and consultant office work beyond the original scope of the project. These
charges will be passed along to Douglas E. Barnhart as a deductive change order to
their contract, which will result in a credit for the City. The balance of $65,820 includes
additional design costs for the bridge element, the teen center and playschool
courtyards, the monument sign at the corner of Base Line and Milliken Road, additional
project signage, as well as reimbursable expenditures. These charges are additions to
RJM's contract and will be paid as a supplement to their existing Pumhase Order.
The sum of the additional charges for Dan Guerra and Associates is $59,755. $24,470
is directly attributed to Douglas E. Barnhart as survey restaking charges and additional
meeting charges resulting from the extended construction period. These charges will be
passed along to Douglas E. Barnhart as a deductive change order to their contract,
which will result in a credit for the City. The balance of $35,285, is for the additional
staking required for the added bridge element and the temporary parking lot, as well as
the preparation of legal descriptions for the street dedication, sidewalk and public water
easements resulting from construction of the project. These charges will be paid as a
supplement to the existing Purchase Order.
Ully sul~mitted, ~ ~
Kevi lo W. il~m J. O'Neil
Community Services Director Ci~ Engineer
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~NCIN E E DIN G DI~PADTr4 E NT
StaffRoport
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resource Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC., FOR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PLANNING AND CONTINUED TECHNICAL
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT WITHIN THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA TO BE FUNDED
FROM 17053035309
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement with Butsko Utility Design Inc., for electrical system planning and continued
technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
service area to be funded from 17053035309
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and
operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services.
Subsequently,
A critical element of the City's plans to serve this area was the construction of an electrical
distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with
Southern California Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast corner of
Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway, to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan area. Council
initiated the preliminary design and final design of the offsite electrical distribution system
via the approval of professional services agreements with Butsko Utility Design on
December 18, 2002 and April 16, 2003, respectively. The project was separated into two
major sections: 1) Conduit and Substructure Section; 2) Cabling, Connections, and
Equipment Section. Both sections of these projects have currently completed construction.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC.
FOR VARIOUS SERVICES RELATED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
JULY 20, 2005
PAGE 2
Staff has identified on-going consultant services that will be required to address operational
and technical issues for the Municipal Utility. Staff has solicited a proposal for these
services from Butsko Utility Design, Inc.
The City Council approved fiscal year 2005-06 budget includes appropriations for these
services based upon the anticipated number of hours of assistance that will be required for
the fiscal year 2005-06. However, the City will only pay for a service actually rendered and
is not committed to any minimum monthly charges.
As the designer of the electrical distribution system, Butsko is uniquely qualified to provide
on-going inspection, design and project management services for the municipal utility.
It is recommended the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services
Agreement with Butsko Utility Design Inc., for electrical system planning and continued
technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
service area to be funded from 17053035309.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
T H C I T Y O F
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Associate Engineer('~'~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO
REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
NORTH OF THE BARRET BASIN, APPROPRIATE $45,782 FROM
GENERAL FUND TO ACCOUNT 10013075650/1501001-0 AND
AUTHORIZE THE ADDITIONAL AWARD TO GRAND PACIFIC
CONTRACTORS, CONTRACT 05-009, IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,782
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the agreement between the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of erosion
control measures north of the Barret Basin, to be reimbursed $45,782 by the County
of San Bernardino, authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement and appropriate
$45,782 to Account No. 10013075650/1501001-0 from General Fund and authorize
the additional award to Grand Pacific Contractors in the amount of $45,782.
BACKGROUND
The City was notified in the fall of funds available to assist with erosion control/flood
control issues needing address at City/County boundary or within the City at County
property. City staff proposed several locations of potential projects. The most
practical and accessible to the City is the north edge of the Barret Basin.
The Barret Basin is located at the north City limit, east of Archibald Avenue. During
the 2003/2004 winter season, significant damage occurred to the Barret Basin as
well as the property to the north from mudslides. The City has repaired the basin
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Re: Approval of the Agreement between the County of San Bernardino and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for erosion control measures north of the Barret Basin
July 20, 2005
Page 2
slopes but corrections were needed north of the basin to ensure proper drainage or
movement of debris through the property north of the basin.
The City's contractor has completed the necessary corrections and repaired the
basin. The subject agreement will allow the County to reimburse the City for work
completed.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO/MEP
TRACT
RANCHO ClII~AMONGA LOCATION: Bonnet erepertyNeL
ENGINEERING DIVISION ,' EXOIBIT: A
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT, AND ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP
16565, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF
VICTORIA STREET, SUBMITTED BY VERNON MORRISON.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map
16565, accepting the subject monumentation cash deposit, and ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 2 and
authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BAC KG ROU N D/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 16565, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Victoda
Street, in the Low (L) Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March
9, 2005. This project is for subdivision of 1.2 acres of land into three lots on Jonquil Drive (a
pdvate egress/ingress access and drainage easement).
The Owner, Vernon Mordson, is submitting a monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the
placement of surveying monuments in the following amount:
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,550.00
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:CA:dlw
Attachments
°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL]YORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16565 AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16565, submitted by Vemon Morrison and consisting
of a subdivision of 1.2 acres of land into three lots on Jonquil Drive (a private egress/ingress
access and drainage easement), located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Victoria
Street, in the Low (L) Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March
9, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16565 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Monumentation Cash Deposit
by Vernon Morrison, as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by
said developer be and the same are hereby approved and that said Parcel Map No. 16565 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
off.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDEKING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL
MAP 16565
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 1, Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the
annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XHID of the Constitution of the State of
California ("Article XIIlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to
levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on
the territory proposed to be annexed to such dislxiets; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, ail of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or
Article XII1D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Ten'itory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all mae and correct
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from
the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders
the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
3 PM 16565
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owners of the Property are:
Vernon R. Morrison and Sarah Ann Morrison, Husband and Wife
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL MAP NO. 16565 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2,
OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1571 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 92,
RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-1 PM 16565 ~[~'~ ~/
CITY OF rrm~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnn,E~-
EN~NEzan~ D~ON
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LIVID gl) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of
parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites tl~oughout the City. These
sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the
entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district
area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon
development
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry
monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and
West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga
Senior Center.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance Dislhct No. 1 (SLD Itl) is used to fend the maintenance and/or installation of
street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this
district, being located on arterial streets, have been detemdned to benefit the City as a whole on an equal
basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is
assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial
streets within the hghts-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD It2) is used to fund thc maintenance and/or installation of
street lights and traffic signals locat~xl on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas
already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses thc residential area of the City
west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the
City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion
thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
B-1 PM 16565
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006)
For Project: PM 16565
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...............
SLD # 2 ...............
Community Trail Tuff Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD# 1 ............
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU S 1 S 2 L 1
B-2 PM 16565 ~o7
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance Dislrict No. 1 (General City):
# of Physical # of Rate Per
Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 757 1.0 .7951 $92.21 $733,161.71
Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70
Corem/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 . $184.42
TOTAL $1,062,535.83
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16565) is:
3 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $276.63 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16565) is:
3 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. -- $53.31 Annual Assessment
C-1 PM 16565 ~
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes thc assessment rate for S~reet Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50
Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43
Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86
Total $280,073.79
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16565) is:
3 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $I 19.91 Annual Assessment
C-2 PM16565 ~ ~
CERI'IIqCATE OF SUIqqCIENCY
CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION
FOR TRACT MAP 16565
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WILLIAM J. O~EIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows:
That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
That on the 25th day of May, 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to
the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance Dislrict, a copy of which is on file in the Office of
the City Clerk.
That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination
revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation had been signed by the owners of all of the property
within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District.
That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
EXECUTED this 25th day of May, 2005, at Rancho Cucarnonga, California.
/ ' crrY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
R A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A MAP, PARCEL MAP 16714, LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE SOUTH OF SAN MARINO
DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY CECIL R. CARNEY AND CATHY A. CARNEY AND
SHUERI I. YAGHI.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tentative
Parcel Map 16714, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to cause said map to
record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 16714, located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue,
south of San Marino Drive, in the Industrial Park Development District, was approved by the
Planning Commission on December 8, 2004 for the division of 1.48 acres into 3 parcels.
The estimated cost of the public improvements is less than $5,000.00 and does not require
an agreement or security. Said improvements will be noted on the Building Permit hard card
and shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to occupancy.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms previously signed by the Developer of Parcel
Map 16118, which Map 16714 is a subdivision, are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MB:pjb
Attachment
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
FOOTHILl BOULEVARD
ARROW ROUTE
CHARLES
6TH STREET
S~MARINO~ ~ I'
4TH STREET
PROdEC~ SIT[
City of Item: ParCel Map 16714
Rancho Cucamonga Title: VICINITY MAP
ENGINEERING EXHIBIT: 1
DIVISION
Parcel Map EXhibit
~i5~-,~-,~---~ [ ITEM: PARCEL MAP 16714
TITLE: parcel Map
EXHIBIT "A"
Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonfla
RESOLUTION NO. ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 16714
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 16714, submitted by Cecil R. Carney and
Cathy A. Carney and Shueri I. Yagchi, and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southern
terminus of Chades Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Drive being a division of 1.48
acres of land was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on December 8, 2004, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map
Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16714 is the final map of the division of land approved
as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for
dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and
the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication,
easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 16714 is
hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
recorder to be filed for record.
I~ a N C H 0 C U C a m 0 N G a
ENGINI~EI~ING DEPA~T~]~NT
$ Repol
DATE.' July 20, 2005
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
~iOM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENACE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 6 FOR TRACT 16648, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE 210 FREEWAY
EASTBOUND ON-RAMP SUBMITTED BY AIM ALL STORAGE 210, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1,2 and 6.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map No. 16648, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and
the 210 Freeway eastbound on-ramp in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units
per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2004 for the division
of 7.8 acres into eight (8) total lots, seven (7) Single Family lots and one (1) lot for the
purpose of a public storage facility.
The Developer, Aim All Storage 210, LLC has previously submitted an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements, with Development
Review DRC2003-00850. City Council approved this project, agreement and security
on January 5, 2005. The final Tract Map was approved by the City Council on May 18,
2005.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16648 - AIM ALL STORAGE SR210, LLC
July 20, 2005
Page 2
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's Office.
Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office
(DRC2003-00850).
Respectfully Submitted,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERING DIVISION
City Engineer
WJO:MB:pjb
Attachments
VICINITY· MAP
· NOT TO SCALE
LEMON 3TI~£ET
Project
Location 4~R
~ RING $ T
19TH ST
City of Item: Tract No. 16648
Rancho Cucamonga Title: VICINITY MAP
ENGINEERING EXHIBIT: l
DIVISION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 6 FOR
TRACT MAP NO. 16648
WHEREAS, THE city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 3B, and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2 and 6 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIlID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply ~o the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
1 TR 16648 b~'
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Temtory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all tree and correct.
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel fi.om the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the
levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth
in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
2 TR 16648
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
Aim All Storage, LLC
The legal description of the Property is:
TRACT NO. 16648, LOTS 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE; BEING A SUBDWISION OF
PARCEL NO. 2 AND PARCEL NO. 3 OF PARCEL MAP 7237 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 74, PAGES 87-88 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-I TR 16648 70
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIsTRIcT NO. I
STREET LIGHT/NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
HEATHER STREET
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOrCTt,
COUNTY OF SAN BERb/ARDINO TRACT IqO. lr,,fo
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A-z s~- ~o~Z ~'~'
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
L~'DscA~- r,~m~L=~A~CS VIS'CT ~O. ~
S~ET LIG~G MA~CE DIS~ NOS. I AND 6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT N0.
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LIVID #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88
acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the
City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City,
but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do
not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within
this district have been annexed upon development
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street
trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear
Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park
and the Rancho Cucarnonga Senior Center.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived fi.om the landscape installation can be directly attributed
to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial.streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
B-1 TR 16648
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but
excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses
the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally,
this area encompasses the indnstrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been
determined that thc facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
B-2 TR 16648
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed addition to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006)
For Project: TR 16648
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLMD #1 ...... 4 ......
SLMD #2 1 ............
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LMD #1 ...... 5,005 6
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Lot DU Acres SLMD #1 SLMD #2 SLMD g6 LIVID #1 LMD #3B
1 1 --- 1 1 --- 1 --
2 1 --- ! 1 --- 1 ---
3 1 --- 1 1 -~- 1 ---
4 1 --- 1 1 --- 1 ---
5 1 --- 1 1 --- 1 ---
6 1 --- 1 1 --- 1 --
7 1 --- I I --- ! -..
8 --- 6.14 12.28 --- 6.14 --- 6.14
B-3 TR 16648
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
Tract No. 16648, Lots I through 7, Inclusive - Residential
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City):
# of Physical # of Rate Per
Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Factor UUlts Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 757 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71
Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70
Comm/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42
TOTAL $1,062,535.83
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
7 DU x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $645.47 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment trait (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land TIKe TInit T~ne ITnlt~ IInlt~ g'antnr Tin/tS TTnit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Multi-
Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
7 DU x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $124.39 Annual Assessment
C-1 TR 16648
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50
Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43
Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86
Total $280,073.79
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
7 DU x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $279.79 Annual Assessment
C-2 TR 16648 7~
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
Tract No. 16648, Lot 8 - Commercial
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2005/2006. Thc following table
summarizes thc assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Usc Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 771,520.68
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
6.14 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $2,166.19 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l.nntt IT~e Il'nit Tx, ne Ilnlt~ IInit~ Factor Ilnit~ ll'nlt l~evenn~
Single
Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Multi-
Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
6.14 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $218.22 Annual Assessment
C-3 TR 16648
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2005/2006. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Tnnd IIce ITnif Txrne ITnife IInlt~ Fnetnr ITnlf~ Unit geve:n,m
Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16648) is:
6.14 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $315.60 Annual Assessment
C-4 TR 16648 7~
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY
CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION
FOR TR 16648
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B,
STREET LIGHTING MAI~NrrENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BEKNARDINO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WILLIAM J. O~XIEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows:
That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
That on the 20th day of July, 2005, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to
the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of
the City Clerk.
That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination
revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the
property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District.
That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
EXECUTED this 20th day of July 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A
1~ NGINI~I~IN C DI~PAI~ TblI~N T
StaffR port
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DRC2002-01023, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY STOR-N-LOCK PARTNERS #18, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject
agreement and securities and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Development Review Project DRC2002-01023, consisting of two new commercial buildings
located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 8), was approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2003.
The Developer, Stor-N-Lock Partners #18, LLC, is submitting an agreement, and security, to
guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Improvement Security Cash Deposit $18,600.00
Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectively submitted,,
City Engineer
WJO:CA:dlw
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 0~~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DRC2002-
01023.
WHEREAS, Development Review Project DRC2002-01023, submitted by Stor-N-Lock
Partners #18, LLC, and consisting of two new buildings, located at the southwest comer of Arrow
Route and White Oak Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), was approved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 12, 2003; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the development
project by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Security by
Stor-N-Lock Partners #18, as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N G a
E NGINI~I~ING DIVI&IO~
Repor
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO;. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH
DEPOSIT, FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET
LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT DRC2002-00864, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WHITE OAK AVENUE
NORTH OF ELM AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY ALLYN B. SCHEU AND THE L. & J.
SCHEU LIVING TRUST.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject
agreement and securities, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B
and Street Light Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said
agreement.
BAC KG ROUN D/ANALYSIS
Development Review Project DRC2002-00864, consisting of two new industrial/commemial
buildings located on the west side of White Oak Avenue north of Elm Avenue in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 7), was approved by the Planning Commission on June 9, 2003.
The Developer, Allyn B. Scheu and the L. & J. Scheu Living Trust, is submitting an agreement, and
security, to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts:
Improvement Secudty Cash Deposit $ 32,400.00
Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's
Office.
Re?e_~tfully submitted, '
willi~J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:CA:dlw
Attachment(s)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY CASH DEPOSIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROJECT DRC2002-
00864.
WHEREAS, development review project DRC2002-00864, submitted by Allyn B. Schen
and the L. & J. Scheu Living Trust, and consisting of two new industrial/commercial buildings,
located on the west side of White Oak Avenue north of Elm Avenue in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 7), was approved by the Plann/ng Commission of the City of Rancho
Cueamonga on June 9, 2003; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval by the City
Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Security Cash Deposit. by
Allyn B. Scheu and the L. & J. Schen Living Trust, as developer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreemem and Improvement
Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
IVlAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MA/NTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-
00864
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State
of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the fight of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within
the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIlID of the Constitution of the State
of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization
to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts
on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the
"Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual
assessments to fmance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto
(the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A
Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the
"Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the
annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIlID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed
annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory
to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory
in amounts not to exceed the mounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct
SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvements.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from
the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders
the levy of ennual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
2 DRC2002-00864 ~
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owners of the Property are:
Allyn B. Scheu and the L. & J. Scheu Living Trust
The legal description of the Property is:
Parcel "B" as per plat attached to Certificate of Compliance No. 430 for Lot Line Adjustment,
recorded February 5, 1999, Instrument No. 99-048000, Official Records, being described therein
as follows:
That portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 10696, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bemardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in book 120 of Parcel Maps, page(s) 8
and 9, records of said county, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast comer of Parcel "A" as per Map attached to Certificate of Compliance
.for Lot Line Adjustment No. 274, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County or San Bemardino,
State of California, recorded July 7, 1988, Instrument No. 19880219282, Official Records;
thence along the easterly line of said Parcel "A" 'and the westerly line of said Parcel 3 the
following courses: north 00 deg. 42' 48", 309.04 feet and notch 39 deg. 21' 46" east, 256.90 feet
to the easterly line of said Parcel 3, said easterly line being a non-tangent curve concave
southwesterly, having a radius of 656.00 feet, a radial line to said curve bears north 39 deg. 21'
46" east; thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 3 the following courses: southeasterly
427.00 feet along said curve through a central angle of 37 deg. 17' 41", south 13 deg. 20' 33"
east, 103.48 feet to the beginning ora tangent curve concave westerly, having a radius of 656.00
feet and southerly 51.35 feet along said curve through a central angle of 04 deg. 29' 05" to the
easterly prolongation of the southerly line of said Parcel "A"; thence south 89 deg. 53' 38" west
422.79 feet along said easterly prolongation to the Point of Beginning.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-1 DRC2002-00864 ~7~
121.41
~AC._ AC Par. Par.
·
"- ~ z. 1 58 AC. .41AC'.
,~,
Par.8'..... (
CITY OF :r~l~:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trr~.~,; 4NN F~X ~_.D ~AF. CF~ L-
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed
to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, enmy monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets
throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally,
this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been
determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of
Foothill Boulevard.
B~i DRC2002-00864 ~
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2005/2006)
For Project: DRC2002-00864
Numbgr of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 -- 3 .........
SLD # 6 ...............
Community Trail Turf Non-Tuff Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LIVID # 3B ......... 17
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU or Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B
1 3.5 7.0 3.5 3.5
B-2 DRC2002-00864 90
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2005/2006
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIALflNDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2005/2006. The following table
summ~zes the assessment rate for Landscape Mamtenenc~ District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial):
# of Physical # of Rate Per
Physical Units Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/lnd Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 771,520.68
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00864) is:
3.5 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $1,234.80 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2005/06. The following table
summarizes the assessment rote for Street Light Maintenance Dislrict No. 1 (Arterial Slreets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27
Family
Multi-
Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80
Family
Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99
TOTAL $612,207.06
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00864) is:
3.5 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $124.39 Annual Assessment
C-1 DRC2002-00864 ~/
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2005/2006. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use ][Init Tyne Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00864) is:
3.5 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $179.90 Annual Assessment
C-2 DRC2002-00864 ~
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY
CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION
FOR DRC2002-00864
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B,
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COLrNTY OF SAN BEKNARDINO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WILLIAM J. O~NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows:
That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
That on the 7th day of July, 2005, I rev/ewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to
the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of
the City Clerk.
That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination
revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property
within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District.
That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
EXECUTED this 7t~ day of July, 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
STATE OF CALIFORN~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING
DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 3.36 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN
SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD DRIVE AND TO CHANGE THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5.54
ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET,
APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262-18 (PORTION OF) AND
27.
A. Recitals.
1. Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP requested a change to 'the Development
District land use designations, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 251h day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. On the 6th day of July 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts,set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on July 6, 2005, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to 12.8 gross acres of land within the General
Commercial and Industrial (Sub Area 1) districts, consisting of restaurant/offices, surface
parking, small residential cottages, a non-conforming industrial use, and undeveloped land; and
b. Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to
the north; vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to the south (across 9th
Street); non-conforming industrial uses to the east; and townhome and single-family
development to the west (across Madrone Avenue); and
c. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA DRC2005-00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP
July 6, 2005
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with
the General Plan and with related development; and
b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code and the General Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, this Council finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and adopts ~ Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA
guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of this Council; and, further, this
Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the facts associated with the proposed project, no significant
adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, this Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to this Council
during the public hearing, the Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107 by the
adoption of the attached Exhibit A.
6. The Secretary to this Council shall cedify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
9TH
........... 1 ..... I 1 I I ill! ..... li ...... l! .......................... 1! ............ !~
~_~SITE BOUNDARY
J~,' ISP SUBAREA 1 BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT 300 0 300 600 Feet
DE3/ELOPMENT DIS,T. AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107
DRC2005-00107 DDA
!
iii~ RICHWOC
"~;~ ~::: :::..~ ~
300 0 300 600 Feet
~ I
~,~ SITE BOUNDARY
EXISTING ISP SUBARF_.A1 BOUNDARY
IP EXISTING ZONING
Gl . DRC2005-00107 DDA
FO
THE CITY OF
I~flNCHO CUCAM ONGA
StaffRe rt
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend
Section 17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including
outdoor RV parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related Files: Conditional
Use 'Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGNSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON A Memorandum of
Understanding for the use of Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for
recreational trail use and some commercial/industrial uses in the selected areas
as allowed by the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 by adoption
of the attached Ordinance and, by Minute action, authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum
of (MOA) Understanding for the City.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144: This amendment would amend the
Development Code to allow, subject to a conditional use permit, public storage facilities,
including outdoor RV parking in the Utility Corridor District. This amendment is similar to the
regulations that already exist for other locations in the Industrial zoned areas that are
designated OS (Open Space) on which Utility Power lines are located. The City has found that
these types of uses are beneficial and reasonably compatible with adjacent uses including
residential. Related Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 (for a public storage facility on
5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings
totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management off~ce of approximately 1,430 square feet,
located on the nor[h side of BaseJ.~e_Road~ east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DCA DRC2003-01144 AND MOA DRC2005-00078
July 20, 2005
Page 2
the SCE power line corridor) was approved by the Planning Commission on Apdl 13, 2005,
subject to the City Council approval of the required Development Code Amendment
DRC2003-01144. There was some neighborhood concern with the public storage facility at the
April 13, 2005, Planning Commission hearing (Exhibit B), and although there was no appeal
filed, the applicant (Southern California Edison Company) requested that the Development
Code Amendment be delayed in order for them to contact the concerned residents. It is the
applicant's request to proceed with the amendment and they expressed that desire in a letter to
Planning staff dated June 14, 2005 (Exhibit C).
Memorandum of Understandinq DRC2005-00078: The City of Rancho' Cucamonga (City) and
Southern California Edison (SCE) for several years have been engaged in discussions
regarding the desire of SCE to develop right-of-ways under ownership or jurisdiction of SCE
located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the City has
planned for the use of portions of the SCE right-of-ways as community trails, parks, and/or
ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General Plan. As a result, SCE and the
City have developed the attached City of Rancho Cucamonga - SCE Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) of SCE's right-of-ways dated January 26, 2005, (Exhibit A) which depicts
SCE's right-of-ways and the land uses which the City and SCE desire to develop and use on
said right-of-ways.
Each of the proposed land uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review
and approval actions including, but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes,
conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan
checks, depending upon the nature of the proposed land use and its location in the City.
The City and SCE reCOgnize that should the SCE right-of-ways be developed according to the
land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized manner,
and the projects must be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all
other applicable regulations and policies.
Implementation of the City's Master Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan attached for
reference are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use within the portions of SCE
right-of-ways where each use is proposed.
Trails Advisory Committee: On February 9, 2005, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed and
recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 as
presented.
Parks and Recreation Commission: On February 17, 2005, the Parks and Recreation
Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the SCE Memorandum of Understanding
DRC2005-00078 as presented.
PlanninR Commission: Reviewed all the Applications on April 13, 2005, and approved or
recommended approval as applicable.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DCA DRC2003-01144 AND MOA DRC2005-00078
July 20, 2005
Page 3
CONCLUSION: Staff finds the proposed changes in the Development Code for the subject
application to be appropriate and an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives
of the General Plan. Proposed Memorandum of Understanding DRC2005-00078 will encourage
orderly development of the sites which will be consistent with the similar type development
throughout the City, and will assure the long term recreation trail use of appropriate areas.
City Planner
BB:LH\ma
Attachments: Exhibit A - Southern California Edison Memorandum of Understanding
DRC2005-00078
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Reports and Minutes dated April 13, 2005
Exhibit C - Southern California Edison letter dated June 14, 2005
City Council Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU")
Concerning the Development of Southern California Edison Right-of-Ways within
the Corporate Limits and Sphere .of Influence of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga
The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and Southern California Edison ("SCE") for several
years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop Right-of-Ways
under ownership or jurisdiction of SCE located within the corporate limits of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. In addition the City has planned for the use of portions of the SCE Right-of-Ways
as community trails, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted General
Plan. As a result SCE and the City have developed the attached "City of Rancho Cucamonga -
$CE MOU - Master Plan" ("Master Plan") of SCE's Right-of-Ways dated January 26, 2005, and
attached hereto as Exhibit A, which depicts SCE's Right-of-Ways and the land uses which the
City and SCE desire to develop and use on said Right-of-Ways.
The City has reviewed the proposed uses depicted on the Master Plan and has determined that
the proposed uses are, in general, contextually appropriate to the location where each use is
proposed.
Each of the proposed land uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to review
and approval actions including but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes,
conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building and fire plan
checks, depending upon the nature of the proposed land use and its location in the City.
The City and SCE recognize that should the SCE Right-of-Ways be developed according to the
land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized fashion, and
the projects must be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and all other
applicable regulations and policies.
After considering the community planning issues associated with the development of SCE
Right-of-Ways within the City the following understanding and considerations have been
determined:
1. The Land Uses depicted on the Master Plan dated January 26, 2005, are, in general,
contextually appropriate to the location where each use is proposed.
2. Each development project proposed by SCE will be subject to, and consistent with
the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all other applicable regulations and
policies.
3. Implementation of the City's Master Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan
dated January 26, 2005 are, in general, conceptually appropriate for use within the
portions of SCE Right-of-Ways where each use is proposed.
4. Implementation of each City Recreation Facilities and/or ancillary use(s) shall be
subject to SCE's review and approval of individual License Agreements, which
includes the operating requirements and limitations of SCE.
.Memo~ndUm of Understandings-
City of R~ncho'Cucamonga: ....
Mayor William Alexander Date
Sou~herfi'CalifOmla Edison: * ' "' ' '
'~,-Manager
Real'E~te Revenue D~sion
CorpOrate Real Estate Department
EXHIBIT "A"
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPOSED RECREATION SITES
RC- 1 A poition of SCE "fee owned" Right of Way (Lugo-Serrano 500kV
Transmission Line) located on the west side of East Ave. for use as a graded dirt lot for
special event parking up to twelve (12) times per year for equestrian related events
consisting of car, track and horse trailer parking.
RC - 2 A 2.00 - 3.00 acm portion of SCE "fee owned" Right of Way located on
the east side of the Day Creek Channel, north of the Wilson Ave. for use as an unpaved
parking lot for trail user(s) vehicles and possibly rest room facilities. It should be noted
that SCE is currently evaluating the future of, this property and the possibility of
disposition.
RC - 3 Trail use for existing 2.50-mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Lugo-
Serrano 500kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" and "easement"
property east of the Day Creek Channel, north of 25th St. to the eastern City limits.
RC-4 Trail use for existing 1.77-mile section of the SCE Right of Way
(Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" property
north of Summit Ave., east of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly City limits.
RC- 5 Trail use for existing .90-mile section of SCE Right of Way (Middle
Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property
northeast of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly city limits.
RC - 6 Trail use for a section of .58 mile of the SCE Right of Way ( Etiwanda-
Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property south of
Almond St. and adjacent to Turquoise Avenue.
RC - 7 Trail use for a .68 mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua
220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" property north of Almond
Avenue and east and west of Carnelian Street.
RC - 8 Trail use for a 3.00 miles of SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-Padua 220kV
Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee-owned" and "easement" commencing just
east of Hermosa Ave. along the northern City limits and ending at the easterly City limits.
6/29/2005 PAGE1 /~
EXHIBIT "A"
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA
SCE - CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SITES
SCE - 1 Power Storage
North Side of Baseline Rd. East of Rochester
8.00 acres (Self Storage)
Etiwanda - Pauda 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 2 Guardian Storage (Phase II)
North Side of Arrow Route, East of Rochester Ave.
14.50 acres (Recreational Vehicle Storage)
West Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 3 Allstate Recycling
East side of Etiwanda Ave, South of Arrow Route
1.00 acre (Material Storage & Parking)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 4 R. Critchfield
North side of 4th Street, East of 15 freeway
6.00 acres (Self Storage)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES
SCE - 5 Future Site
South side of Arrow Route, West of 15 freeway
3.94 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 6 Future Site
South side Foothill Blvd, west of Day Creek Channel
4.67 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 7 Future Site
North side Foothill Blvd., West of Day Creek Channel
1.00 acres (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use)
West Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 8 Future Site
North side Foothill Blvd. to Baseline Rd., East of Day Creek Channel
36.00 acre (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or Mixed Use)
Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way
6/29/2005 PAGE2 /~
EXI-IIB IT "A"
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SCE MOA
SCE - FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES - (continued)
SCE - 9 Future Site
South side Baseline Road, West of Day Creek Channel
+_ 36.00 acres (Possible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 10 Future Site
North side Baseline Road, West Of Day Creek Channel
_+ 20.00 acres (Possible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture)
West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 11 Furore Site
South side of Highland Ave., east of Orange Ave.
_+ 15.00 acres (Possible Use: RV & Boat Storage)
Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way
6/29/2005 PAGE 3
THE CITY O'F
II
~ANCI{O CgCAMO'NCA: ·
DATE: Apd113, 2005
TO: Chairman and Membem of the Planning Commission
FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson,'AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section
17.16.030 use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV
parking, in the Utility Corridor District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit
DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff has prepared a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideretion.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request for a public
storage facility on 5.38 acresin the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV
parking, six storege buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of
approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the north side of Base Line Road,
east of DaY Creek Flood Control Chanriel within the Edison power line corridor - APN:
1089-03!-12. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144, Tree
Removal Permit DRC2004-00847, and Preliminary Review DRC2002~00704. 'Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideretion.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION.:..
A. Project Density: The proposed project is an outdoor RV parking and a public storage facility
on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, consisting of six storege buildings· totaling 71,175
square feet, and a management office Of approximately 1,430 sc uare feet.
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin.q:
North ~ Vacaqt/UtilityCorridor
South - Base Line Road and Vacant Land/Open Space
East Temporery Fire Station, Household Hazardous Waste collection
Center/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) . .
West Day Creek Flood Control Channel to the west/Open Space
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT .
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 2
C. General Plan Desi.qnafions:
Project Site - Flood Control/Utility Corridor
North' - Flood ContmlAJtility corridor
South - Flood control/Utility corridor '
East - LOW-Medium Residential (4;-8 dwelling Units per acre)
West - Flood Control/Utility corridor ·
D. Site Characteristics: This site is a Southern California Edison (SCE) power line corridor with
permanent .towers and transmission lines. The easterly 35 feet is reserved for a future
· ' transmission line. Previously, the site was used as a landscape nursery with no permanent
structures. The site toPOgraphy falls from north to south at approximately 2 1/2 percent, and
dm ns to Base Line Road and then eastward towards an existing drain inlet. There are two
mature trees near the southeast comer that are proposed to be removed (DRC2004-00847).
E. Parkin Calculations:
Number of Number of
~ ~ S aces Previded
Public StOrage 6 ' 12
ANALYSIS:
A. General: This project includes three components. The first is an amendment of Section
17.16.0[}0 the Utility Corridor District use regulations to. allow public storage facili~es,.
including outdoor RV parking in the Utility corridor District with a conditional use permit. The
second component consists of plans for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility
Corridor District, along 'with 'outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175 Square
feet, and a management office.of approximately 1,430 square feet, located on the north side
of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood control Channel within the SCE power line
corridor. The third component, which does notrequire Planning Commission action, is the
°n
processmg of a Memorandum of Agreement between SCE and the City for the master
· planning of future public recreation use and private commercial use of fee owned SCE
properties within the City.
Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130! The architectural plans submitted are of a high
quality design which meets the City's design guidelines and applicable General Plan policies.
The architecture design is Mediterranean with a strong tower element at the main entrance.
· Building materials include decorative comice, stucco walls, ledger stone wainscot, and
decorative block perimeter walls consistent with the adjacent Victoria Planned Community. ·
Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144: 'This Amendment would amend the
Development Code to allow, subject to a conditional use permit, public storage facilities,
including outdoor RV parking in the Utility Corridor District. This amendment issimilar to the
regulations that already exist for other locations' in the Industrial zoned areas that are
designated OS (Open Space) on which are located Utility Power lines. The City has found
that. these types of uses are beneficial and reasonably compatible with adjacent uses
including residential.
.- .
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 3 :
B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee reCOmmended approval at its March 1, 2005,
meeting.
C. · Technical Review Committee: The Committee reCOmmended approval with COnditions.
D. Environmental Assessment.: Staff has prepared an Initial Study and has reCOmmended a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Development of
the site. under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies COnstruction-related
emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation
measures would further reduce emission evels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air
quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were COmpleted.
The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of
people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will·
ensure impacts ara at less-than-significant levels in COnnection with the approval of the
COmponent of this project which is the subject of the approval of the Conditional Use Permit
and by the .imposition of site-specific mitigation measures on futura applications for self
storage facilities in the Utility Corridor District..
FACTS FOR FINDING: See 'attached Resolutions for applicable findings.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley DailY
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: .Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Negative
Declaration'and approve the attached Resolutions approving Conditional USe Permit
DRC2003-01130 and reCOmmending that. the City Council approve Development Code
Amendment DRC2003-01144 and adopt the Negative Declaration. Final approval of the
Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon City Council approval of the Development Code
Amendment.
Respectfully submitted,
City Panner
BB:LHVna
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map · ·
· Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
F_,~ibit "C" -. LandScape Plan
Exhibit "D" - FlOor Plan
Exhibit 'E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Initial Study
Drafat Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2004-01144
Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130
~"~'ZONE
Go~.t. Lot 5
ENTRY ~m ~AnON
~ VICINI,
_ I ~,~,~w~.~o. 2_~-~
' c~- , -'--. '----. ~-~ ~
- ~... .. , '~~
'= --..--.. ~ ~ IIIllllllll~lllllll{llilllll1111~4~-~J?
. ... · . - ,
~-~ ~
:.:' POWER· STORAGE RANCHO CUOAMONGA, Lm PRELIMINARY
~NCHO OU~ONG~ ~
~ ·
~~T ~'~ PI.AHT PAL.t: i I ~- · '
~llllllllffilllllll~illllllllffillilllill~lllllllli~ ~'.__ ..
pOwER STORAGE .RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC PRELIMINARY
~CHO CUiNg, ~
6 OF8
Al POWER STORAOE PREUMINARYUNITMIX PLAN ~,.~ ~ .~'I1~ ~.~v~
RANOHO OUOA~ONGA, OA $ R 0 U '
,,
...... EAST ELEVATION-BUILDINI~ A NORTH ELEVATION . OFFIOE~ BUILDING .~ :.
I .... ''Il · :.
801.~, £LEV~TIO~. B~SELllq£ ROAD
7 OF8
" POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ LLC PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS -,"" ~ L~
m~'~'~ RO U P
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA :
--~O-P, TH ELEVATION. BuILOIN~-B
80~THELEVATION BUILDING B, NORTH AND
_. 80UTH ELEVATIONS BUILDING ~, D, E AND F 81MILAR
· .. ' · / ~.,,:,-,.., '/. ~.-...- . · · ............... ~=-~-'- .
· . ...:.. //-.
·...--.-....
I ' ' ' :' '
__~:.,. ,.. ~___ . .., . , ,. .~:_.:.~.l. ll ...... '..: ...... ~ ·/~ , .. ~ . ~._.
.'~"-t;."-'----~ ' ~'.''.*~. :'"~ ' ':.: .
,..... .. ______ .
· - ' ~L~T ELEVATION- OFFICE, BUILDING B AND C
- . ~4~m ' "~.~.-,~ ~u ' · · . EAST ELEVATION BUILDIN~ B ANn C SIMILAR .' .
///-.---- /. · .._ ...... :.__ .......... :....._._.:...,.:.. ......... _
Jr-: - .~. ....id./,, b. I ~ / ' · '
'~ ' : ..... '" " ":" '" ":~ ' ~'
: '~ .. ' ' ' ' ' . ' /"'~' ~N-BUILDING~D, EAND~ '
...... - ..... EAI~T ELEVATION ~UiLDiN~ i), ~= AND F ~iLAR
~ oE'a..
POWER STORAGE P, ANCHO CUCAMONGA~ LLC PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
· .' .~: :.:. ENVIRONMENTAL
'" INFOR FORM
· .. }(Part
INGOMPI-~ I t~J~PU cATIoNS INIU. NOT BE PROCESSED. Ple~ note teat it Is tee m.~ of ~ ~ to et~d4~, tJ
t~e appliceSon Is complete at.tl~ time of ~W~n~tal; City ~ ~-not I~e a~iisbis ~o ~ wo~ required ~ ~ ~
~..~~.~~.~. ,-,.... O~fo~. ·
~ .... 'i~. :~- .' PI~-..
· ..: ' ..~ ~ ~ ~ '.. ~ . _
-
I~NI~I~OR~R~N~1,~D ~ ~ · .' ~ ~
8)InclUde a descripUon of all pe~nit= which will be ne~sat~ f~m the City of R~ncho Cucarno~ga and olher govemmet~al
agencies in otder to fully implement ~ ptojet~ . .
· I,tlll ,ltll~lll~";ll:llqAI ~F~RMS'~C, OUNTER~INITSTDt.Wi:~ 3/00 ;. P~ge 3
. w/~ tesu/t from b~e ~ project Ind/cate ff ~em are proposed phases for deve.l~..ment..the extent of dev.e__~** ~o.
~,cur with each plm.,,'e, and b~e ar~ctpaled complegon of esch lnctemenL AU.ach addigonal .sheet[*) lf nece~saO': · * ..
· ~ tnd~t~ W ~ o~and use (re.VUen~e~, commerces, e~). ~nten-vty or,and use (one-f,,r~, ~ ~.
~ Ue~mer~ ~ etc.) ~nd ~e o~Ueve~ment (~e~t, ~, ~ee:~*, re~ryan~
:
,. affect adjacent properties ~ on-site use.s. What me--.of,soundproofing are proposeoT
17') lndicat~ any bodle~ of wa , ..
259t. *.
~) .~v~p ,~d ~ ...
· 's~,~(~) . ~ '. s
., ~ReM. (permonth) $
22) Spe~/ ,u,~r o~ b~n~oms t
· ATTACHMENT A
Water Usage '
· Average u~e per da;/
R~sldentlal
· ' - Single Fart~y 600 gal/day.
.. Apt/Condo 400 gal/day.
commercla I/Industrial
· ' ' General and Regional Co .n~nerclal 3000 gal/day/a~
Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/day/ac
1500 gal/day/ac
General Induslflal
induslrlal Park 3000 gal/day/au
Peak Usage
For ell uses .
· .average .use x2.0
Sewer Flows
Residential 270 gal/day
s~g~ Famay
.a~ot/Condoe 200 gal/day
Commerclal/industrlaJ 2000 g~l/day/a¢
General ~ 100-1500 gal/clay/a~
Neighbodlood Commercial
GeneraHnduslrlal ' 2000 gal/day/ac=
Heavy I~clusl~d 3000 gal/dayla~..
8ou~e: 'Cucamonga County Water District. Master Plan, 9/88
i..U~NiNG~iNAL~FORMb~UN~NITSTO1 .WPD 3/00 -
· Contac~ tt~ school distri~ for your area for amount and payn~nt'of school fees:.
E~menlalrySchooIDIstd°t~ ' ' ' '
9350 Base Une Road, Suite F · '' ~ · i' '
Rancho cucarnonga,. CA 91730" . :. . . .
'(909) e87~768' -' .. .-
.- ~0601 Chu..r~. Slree~,Suite 1i2
" (~0~) e8e-e54~
Cucanx~ga
· 8776 Archlbakf ~venue . .. · :.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(0O9) 087-8042 . - ·
Et~a~a :' "
.5959 East Avenue
" P.O. Box 248
.Ran,hoCucanm . ' '.
;
(909) 988-85~ 1
VALLI
ARCHITECTURAL
GROUP
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC
pROJECT NO. 0t-260
July 14, 2003
City of Rancho Cucamonga'
Community Development Department
10500 Civic. Center. Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: . Power Storage Ranch° Cucamonga, LLC
Project No: 01-260 . '
· We would like to request YOur app~val of a Conditional Use Permit, for the proposed 72,843
square feet serf storage facility consisting of a 71,408 square feet of self-stOrage. 1.435 square
feet management office, and outdoor RV parking spaces.
The. site is on the northerly side of Baseline Road between the streets Rochester Avenue and
' Day Creek Blvd. The western property line lies 30 feet east of the easement for the Day Creek.
Channel. Currently, the site is being used as a nursery with no permanent structures. The .
existing sheds are dated and have no foundalJons.
· The site topography is relatively fiat, and it falls from the'north to the south at approximately 2.5
%. The site currently drains to Baseline Road.
Benefit to the CommUnity
The project objective is to'Provide a quality self storage facility that will bettar serve the needs
of the community. The demographics of the tenant profile for this include local business
professionals who usually store records and office equipment, home based businesses, and
households within the community.
Self storage prelects have proven to be excellent neighbors both for commercial and residential
neighbors alike. It requires minimum city services from water, sewer, police and fire
departments. It adds minimum traffic to the neighborhood as most Storage tenants visit their *
unit'dudng off-peak .hours and on weekends. It also brings to the city a much needed tax base.
Minimum Traffic impact '
According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (iTE), self-storage generates the lowest
level of traffic commercial~ retail, office or industrial land uses.
Serf-storage peak hours vehicle trip rate is 0.17 trips/i,000 SF to 0.258 trtps/1,000'sF. 'For this
project this data translates to 11.5 to 17.5 vehicle trips at peak hour use periods. This happens
usually in the mornings during the week. The average traffic generated (14.5 peak hour vehicle
trips) during a nine hour weekend business day would total less than 130 trips/day with four
employees.
The new building addition with its traditional Califomia architecture will greatly enhance the
overall character of the facility, bdnging a much needed improvement to the Baseline Road
street scape.
The building is well articulated. Its design incorporates various roof heights and masses,
projections and recessed wall planes. Further intarast is created through the use of different
building materials, such as stucco and mission tile roofing,-and architectural details and colors.
The state-of-the-art design will elevate the Standards for new development in the area and
serve as a catalyst for other quality developments.
Current operation hours will be kept. The office will typically be open from 8am to 6pm from
Monday to Sunday..
There will be 2 to 4 employees working at the site. Two emploYees'will work at the facility dudng
business hours, occupying the office at all times from opening to dosing.
The new self-storage addition will boast a new state-of the-art security system with individual
door alarms~ security cameras, and an infrared alarm system. The site will also have a new
computer[zed gala system.
Summary
The proposed Power StOrage facility will be a modem aesthetically pleasing project with slate-
of-the att security systems. It will be a major benefit to the community with minimum impact to
existing public utilities, services and traffic.
·
We respectfully submit the proposed additiOn for your review andrequest YOur appmvel of a
Conditional Use Permit..
Ariel L Valli
President, Velll Architectural Group
.i
·
POWER STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC PHOTO LOCATION PLAN
'RANCHO cUO/~OHC-~A, CA . --,.,~.
....
City of Rancho Cucarnonga'
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART I1,.
BACKGROUND .
1. Project File: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 and ConditiOnal Use Permit
DRC2003-O1130
· es: it DRC2004-00847 ~y R DRC2002'00704
2. Related Fil Tree Removal Perm and Prelimina evlew
~. Description of Project= A request to amend section 17.16.030 the Utility Corridor District.uss
regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking and a request for a public
storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor DiStrict, along with outdobr.RV parking, six
storage buildings totaling 71 175 square feet, and a roanagemant office of approximately 1,430
square feet to be located on the north side of Base. Erie Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control
Charms with n the Edison power line corridor - APN: 1089031-!2. '
4, project Sponsor's Name and Address: '
Southern Califorola Edison.
Michael Orduno, CClM Land Development Manager
14799 Chestnut Street
· westmln'stbi~, CA 92683' ~
.5. General Plan Designation: Flood ControVUfllity Corridor. ' · '
5. Zoning: Utility corridor.
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Utility Corridor to the north, Day Creek Flood Control
· Channel 'to the west, Tempo[afl Fire Station, Household'Hazardous Waste Oollectlon Center, and
· Flood Control D strict Maintenance Facility to the east, Base Line Road and Utility Corridor to' the
SOUth.
5. Lead Agency Name end Ad.dr~:' ·
City of Rancho Cucernonga . .. . ·
Planning Deparlmant
10500 Civic Center Drive ·
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ..
'~. Contagt Person and Phone Number=.
'Larry Henderson, AIGP, Pdnolpal Planner
(SOg) 477-275O
10. Other agencies whose approval Is' 'required. (e.g., permlt~, financing .apprOval,. or
particlpatton agreement): Calitomla Public Utilities Comroisalon
· GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used In this report: ..
· ~ CVWD - Cuca~.onga Valley Water District · .
EiR- Environmental Impact Report -. ·
· FEIR ~ Final Environroental Impact Report
NPDE$ - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systaro
NOx ' Nitrogen Oxides
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases.'
PMm - Fine Particulate Matter
RWQCB- Reglonal Water Quality Control Board
$CAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan .
UROEMIS?G - Urban Emissions Model 7G
Initial Study for · City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01130 . Page 2
ENViRoNMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by'this projeCt,'lnvoMng at least
one Impact that is o. 'Potentially Significant Impact,' "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
;.co,-pu~a~r' or 'l_ess Than' Significant Impact' as IndiCated by the checklist on the following pages.
I() AesthetiCs () AgriculturalReso-~ces (X)AIrQuality : ·
( ) Bio oglca ReSources (X)Cultural Resources' ' (X) Geology & Soils ' ..
( ) Hazards & Waste Materla s (X) Hydrology & Water Quality ' ( ) Land Use & planning
L ~ ~,,,,,~ r~mmuross ' ' OQ Noise ( )'population & Housing
I~ ~ b~lities & Service Systems (). Mandatory Findings of SIgnificanse
DETERMINATION ' '
on the basis of this Inlital evaluation:
( ) I find that the propound project C°ULD NOT have. a algnificsnt effect on the environment. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could 'have a significant effeo~ on the environment, there
.... will nat be a significant effect In this case because revisions In the proJec~ have been made by, or
agreed to, by the.proJect, proponenL A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be pmporad..
() I find that fie proposed project 'MAY have a significant effect on the envlronment~ and. an
ENVIRONME.NTAL IMPACT REPORT is requlrecl. ·
· () find that fie proPOSed project MAY have a 'patentl~lly Significant Impact' or "Potentially '
· Adequately analy-zao n an earlier eocumem pursuanz zo appuCaom
;~d-~-e~se(J by mltlga' tlon measures based on Ifle earlier analysis as described On attache(3 sr~eels..
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but It must.analyze only the effects that
(..) I find that although th~ Proposed project could have a significant effe~' on the envlronmant,
because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately In an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, Including revisions or
mitigation measures that am Imposed upon the proposed project,, nothing furthor is required.
Prepare Date:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for .- . Page 3
DRC2003-01130. '
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .
1. AESTHETICS. wOUld the project: · ( ) ( ) ( ) . (.') "'
. a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista?
b) Substantially dai~uge suu~;c, resources, Including, · ( ) ( ) : ( ) (v')
but not limited, to, Ireas, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? ·.
c) ' Substantially degrade the ex~[i~ visual r,h~ac;.e,- ( ) ( ) . ( ). (~')
· or ?J~!!ty of the'sEe endlts surroundings?
· d) Create a new source of sub=[a,,;Jal light or ylu[u, ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
which would, adversely affect day or nighttime
;~---~-~ In the area?
a) · There am no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project Site. 'The site Is not within a
vtaw corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15.
b) The project sEe contains n~ scenic'resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic
Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucemanga.
c) The site Is located on'the norlh Side of Base. Une Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control
· Channel within the Edison power line corridor and Is characterized by a mix of residential,
utility, and institutional devalopmerit to the north, south, east, and west. The visual quality of
the area will not degrade as a result of this. pmjest. Design review Is required prior to
approval. City standards require.the developer t° underground existing and new utility lines
and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures
In' a~cordance with Planning Commisblan Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said
Resolution.
d) The project WOUld Increase the number of sb-eetiights and security lighting 'used In the
Immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on' Site Plans
which require review for consistancy with. City standards that requlrea shielding, diffusing, or
Indlra(;t lighting to avolcl glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of
illumination to wilhin the project stie; The impact IS not considered slgnlflcent.
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the project:' .. ( ) () (e~) ' ( )
a) Convert Pdme Farmland, Unigue Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
" shown, on* the maps pmparod pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and MonitOring Program of the
Callfomla Resources AgenCY,'to norkagdcuttural
· use?
b) Conflict with existing ZOning for aG~cultural use, or ( ) · ( ) . ( ) (v')'
· ' a Wllllamson Act contract?
· · o) Involve other changes In the existing environment, ( ) ( ) (
which, due to their location or nature, could result In
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
a) The site is nOt designated as Pdme Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of statewide"
Importance. The site Is located.on approx matalY 6.48 acres of land· and is characterized by
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for- Page 4
DRC2003-01130
uttilty corridor development to the 'north and south, institutional use to the east, and flood
conlml channel to the wesL There ara approximately 1,3Q0 acres of prime Farmlands,
Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Stetewide Importance'within the City. of Rancho
Cucamonga, of which about one-third Is either developed or ~ommltted to development
acoording to General Plan Table IV-2. The major conCentrations of designated farmlands ara
located in the Southern and eastern portions of cur City that Is characterized by exIsting and
planned developmenL Furlher, two-thirds of the designated farmland parcels are small,
ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their'economic viability Is doubtfal; therefore, they are
not Intended to be retained as farmland In the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General
Plan Final EnvirOnmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the convarslon of farmlands to
urban Uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding
Considerations was ultimately adopted, by the City Council. The pmpoead project Is
consistant ~ the Ganeral Plan for which lhe FEiR was prepared and Impa~S evaluated.
There is no agriculturally zoned lend'within, the City .of Rancho Cusamonga. There'ere no
b) Willlamson Act contracts within the CRy;
¢) The site is located on apprOximately 6.48 acres of land and is characterized by utility corridor
development, and to utility corridor development to the north and south, Institutional use to
the east, and flood control channel to the west. The.nearest agricul~l u.se~ Is mom than
a) Conflk=t with or obst~uct'lmplementati°n of the
appLIc~_b!e air quailty plan? ·
b) Violate any air quality s~ai~ard or c~,,;,;;~te () (V) () ()
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
c) Result In a cumulatively conside[a~;e net ina ~a~ ( ) ( ). ( ) (v').
of any criteria pollutant for which the project region
is non-attainment under an applicable. Federal or
State ambient air quality standard 0ncludlng
: releaelng emeslone that exceed, quantitative -.
threshold_- for ozone precursors?
· d) Expose sensitive recep~,~-~ to sub~,,~;a; pollutant . (. ) . (v') () ()
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable uGo~ a,,~e~,G,y a subs~i~al ( ) ( ) ()
· .number of ~_,~,?!e?
e) As noted In the General Plan FEIR (SectiOn 5.6), continued development Will contribute to the
pollutant levels In the Rancho Cucamonga.araa, which already exceed Federal and State
standards. The General Plan FEIR Identified .lfle cltywide InCreaSe In .eml.~slone .aa
significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations
was ultimately adopted by {fie Clty. Councti; The proposed project is consistent wllh the
. General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated, *
b) During the constructi°n phases of development, on-site 'statiOnary aoumes, heavy-duty
consl~uction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions.
In addition, ~gltive ·dust would also be generated during grading and constrp, cflon actlylties.
While most of the dust would setlte on or near the project site, smaller particles would remeln
In the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an
on-going Indusb'y In the Rancho Cucemonga area.. Construction workers and equipment
City of Rancho Cucam0nga
· Initial Study for
DRC2003-01130 ' . . . Page 5
work and operate at one development site until their tasks am complete. They then transfer
to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with
c6nstrUction activities am not new to the Rancho Cucamonga ama and they would not violate
an air quality standard or women the existing air.quality In the region. Nevertheless, fugitive
. dust and equipment emissions ara required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-speCific basis. Therefore, the following
mitigation measures sba be implemented to reduce impacts to less-~an-signlficant levels:.
'i) .NI construction equipment shall be maintained In g0od operating condition so .
· as to. reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment Is being properly serviced and maintained as per
manufacturara' specifications. Maintenance records shall, be available at the
construction site for City verification. · .
2) Prior to the Issuance of any Grading Pennlta, the developer shall submit
construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected
'equipment uae. construction contractors shall provide evidence that
Iow.emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use
was Inyeetlgated and found to be Infeaslbta for the proJe,~'t. Contractors shall ..
also conform to any constructten measures Imposed by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as.well as City Planning staff.
3) All.painta and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In
SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or
high-volume, Iow-praeeura spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In sCAQMD Rule
5) All construction equipment shall comply"wlth SCAQMD Rules 402 end 403
Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisionS:
· Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through Seeding and
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul road~. ' .' . .
· · Phase grading to. prevent the susceptibility of !erge areas to. ereslon over
· extended periods of time. "· ' '
·Schedule activities to mlnlmtae the' ~,mounts of exposed excavated
during and afte~ the end of work periods. . .
· · Dispose of surplus excavated material In accordance with local ordinances .
and use.sound engineering practices: .
· ' * Sweep ctrae~s according to a schedule established by the City If silt. Is
carried 'over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur· as a result of
hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time Of year of construction.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds (I.e~,i'wlnd sPeeds
exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule'403 requiramento.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or =over
payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]}' dally to reduce
Fine Particulate Matter (PM¢) emlssl0ns, In accordance.with SCAQMD Rule 403. '
· City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for'' : Page 6
DRC2003-0! 130
Chemlcel soil.stabilizers (approved by $CAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to
ail Inactive constructl°n areas that remain inactive for96 hours er more to
reduce PM~, emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall· uUIIze electric or clean, alternative
fuel-powered equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction grading plans Include
· a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use.
· . . After implementation of the preCeding mitigatiOn measures, sh(xt-teml constTUCtlon air
quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section
5.6). Based Upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEM S7G) model estimates In
Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases
(ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~0) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for
significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated
on a project basis to a level lees-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR Identified the
city,,vide Increase In emissiOns as a significant unavoidable adverse tmpaot for which a
Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council.
In the Iong-tarm; development COnsistent with the General Plan' would result in
elgnificent operational vehicle emissions based .upon the uRBEMIS?G model
estimates In Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively
elgnificent if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant.
The fo!lowfllg mitigation measures shall be Implemented:
t0) All Industrial and commercial facllltiea shall post signs requiring that trucks shall
not be left Idling for prolonged periods (I.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
t~1) .All Industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential Parking for '
vanpools.
.12)'All Industrial and commercial slta tenants with 50 or more employees shall be
required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules In conspicuous smal-
l3) NI Industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be
required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to
the extent reasonably feealble.
14)'. NI residential and commercial structures Shall be required to Incorporate.
hlgh.effiotency/Iow-pollutlng heating, air conditioning,' apl~l!ance~, and water
heaters. ·
15) NI residential and Commerotal structures shall be required .fo Incorporate
· · thermal pane windows and weather-ntripplng. · ·
After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan' FEIR .
identified the eltywide increase In operational emissions as a significant unavoidable
'adverse impact for which a Statement of. Overriding Considerations was ultimately
adopted by the City Council.. "'
c) As noted In the' General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to
the pollutant levels In the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State'
standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase In emissions as a
signifiCant and adverse mpact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was .
· City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Steady for ~ Page 7
DRC2003-0t 130 . · ' '
uitimately adopted by the CIty Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General
Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated.
d) Sensitive receptors are defined as .populations that' are more susCeptible to the effects of
latton at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive
DOI ution than the popu .......... . ntere convalesCent.Centers,
[-eceptors: long,term health care racmu~.~, m ......... tion ce ,
~eflrement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care canters, and athletic'facilities-'
Aoc~rding to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create Significant Jmpaots If they
are located within % mile of sensitive receptors and would' emit toxic air contaminants
/ identified in SCAQMD Rule '1401. According to the sCAQMD, projects have the potential to
~reate significant Impacts If they are located'within % mile of sensitive receptors and would ·
· emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located
within % mile fTom the nearest sensitive reCeptor:, single-familY residences to the west and
nOdh, The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce Impacts to a level of
lesS.~en-SlgnifieanL
e) TYPically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse Impacts are
anticipated. ' '. ' .. ' '
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would.theproJe~
· a) Have a substantial aclveme effect, either dlrenfly Or
through habitat modifications, on any
identified es a candidate, sensitive, or.
status species In local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S~ Fish and Wildlife Service?
a substantial .adverse effect on
habitat or other .sensitive natural community
identified In local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and WildlIfe Service?
a substantial adverse effect on
protectad wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Aat (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etC.) Ihrough dlre~
removal, filling, hydrological Interruption, or other
means?
substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or .with established native resident or migratory
wildlfe corridore, or Impede the'uea of native
wildlife nursery sites?
with any local policies or ordinances
· protecting biolegjcal, resources, .. such. as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
with' the provisions of
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
conservation Plan, .or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat conservatio..n plan?
a). The project site is located In an' area developed With Utilities and Institutional 'useS. The site
has been previously disrupted, dUdng previous use as a Nursery and disclng for we~5,~
Initial Study for.' City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
DRC2003-01130 ·
abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan
FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore,
development will not adversely affect mm or endangered species of plants or animals
· because of the fact that the project Is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent
with the General Plan Land Use Plan.
b) The project site Is located In an urban area with no natural communities. N° riparian habitat
exists on-site,.meaning the pmjest will not have any Impacts.' ·
· c) No wedand habitat is present on~slta. As a result, project Implementation would have' no
Impact on these resources;
· ' ' is being developed, thereby disrupting any
d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or
wildlife con,dom that may have existed. No adverse impaCts are anticipated.
e) There are two heritage trees near the southeast comer of the project site. The proposed
project design Includes over a dozen new trees along Street frontage. The applicant has filed
a reques! for Tree Removal permit DRC2004-00847..
The project alta Is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan,
Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No confficts with habitat conservation
plans will occur.
CULTURAL R£$OUR¢£$, Wo~/d the pro/eof: ~
e)Causa e aubstantial adverse changa In theI '.
significance of e historical resource es defined In
pursuant to § 15064.57~ ' ·
Comment~:
'a} The project site has not been identified as a."Histodc Resource' per the standards of RanChO.
Cucamonga Municipa Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation}- There.will be no Impact.
b} There are no know~ archaeOlogical sites or resources recorded on'the project site; however,
the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been 'inhabited' by Native Aman~an~
according, to the General Plan FEIR ($e~on 5, tl}. Construction activity, parilcola~
grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing eno
potential archaeo!ogical resources. The fo Iow ng mitigation measures shall be implemented:
t) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are' encountered before or durinl]
grading, the, developer Will retain a ·qualified archaeologist to 'monitor
· construction activities, to'take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them.,
for study. With the assistance of the archaeelogl.t, the ,City of'Rancho
Cucamonga will:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for Page 9 ·
DRC2003-01130 '
· Enact Interim measures to protect· undesignated sites from demolition or
significant modification without an opportunity for the City t° establish Its.
archaeological value. · . ..
· Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological
sites within new developrnenta, using their special qualifies as a theme or -
· focal ix)Int. .. ·
· PursUe educating the public about'the area's archae010glcai he, ritage~
· ~ropose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to
· eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and Unique
prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines;.
· prepare s teohnlcal resources' management report, documenting the
Inventory, evaluation, and proposed mltigation of resouroeS within the
project area. ·Submit one copy of the completed report with original
Illustrations, to the San. Bernardino County Archaeofogical Information
Center for permanent arohivlng.. '.
c) The General Plan FEIR (SeCtion 5.11) Indicates that the RanCho cucamonga area is on an -
· alluvial fan.' According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or
resources have been recorded within the City of RanCho' Cucam°nga or the sphere-of-
Influe'nca, including the project site; however, the area has. a high sensitivity rating for.
paleontological resources. The older allUVium, whiCh would have'been deposited during the
wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of'
the Quctemary period, when the last 'ica Age' and the appearance of modern man occurred,
may COntain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quatamary
alluvium per General Plan Exhlbit'V-2; bherefore, the following mlUgatlon measures.shall be
Implemented:
'2) A qualified 'paleontologist shall conduct a prec0nstructlon field survey of the
· project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also
c recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (I.e.,
· provide speclfl ............ ri,to. Where mitigation
paleontological monltor!ng) tnat may oe app~,p . . .........
monitoring Is appropriate, the program must Include, but not De ilmlte¢l to, toe
following measure/:
· Assign a paleontological rm)nitor, trelned and equlppod to allow th® rapid
removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time'
during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. '
· Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert
earth.disturbing activities .elsewhere until the monitor has completed
Salvage. If construction personnel mal(e the.. disC°Very, the grading
contractor should Immedlataly divert, construFflon a~td notify the monitor
· · , of the find. ' " ·
· · Submit a summary 'report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer
collected specimene with 'a copy of the report to. tho San Bernardlno
· County Museum.'
d) The proposed project Is in an area ·that has already' been disturbed by development. The
project site has already been dis;upted by previous use as a Nursery, and constnjctlon of
infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual dishing for weed abatement..No known
religious or ~aored sites exist within the project area. No evidence is In place to suggest the
sad for human burials. The' California Health and Safety Code
ecl site has been. u · · '. no further disturbance
pmj . t If uman remains ara disCOvered on-site,
[Llle~o~rO5uOr~l L~ete~ot~una~ ~oUroner has made. detam~inatlon of origin and disPosltlon~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10'
DRC2003-01130
pursuant to Public Resources Cede Section 5097.98: As adherence to State ~.eguisfions is.
required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains·
are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. ..
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Wouldthepro~.'
a).Expose people o~ structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss,, injury, or
· .death involving:
· .I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent AJquist-Pdolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map 'issued by the
· State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refar'to Division of Mines and Geology
S_L0ectal Publication 42.
ill) Seismic-related ground failure, Including
Landslides? '
b) Result in substantial s-'"--~il 'erosion or the .loss'of
topsoil?
c) Be' located on a geologic unit or s0il .that IS
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result In on- or off-site
· landslide, lateral spreading,
Ilquofactlon or collapse? '
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table
18-1-B of the Unlfom3 Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastawater
disposal systems where sewers are not ava able
for the disposal of Wasfawater?'
a) NO known faults pass through the site and It is not In an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is It In the
Rancho Cucemonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General
Plan Exhibit V-I, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within
1.04 milos north of the site, and the Cucamanga Fault Zone Iies approximately 3.36 milos north.
These faults are both capable of preducing M~ 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. ALso, the San Jaclnto fault,
capable of producing up to M,, 7.5 earthquakes, is 8 to 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the
San Andrees, capable of up'to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, Is 8 to 10 miles northeasterly of the site.
Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code
will ens .ure that geo!ogic impacts am less-than-significant. ·
'The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site
soils. The Rancho CucamOnga area Is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during
September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and craates erosion problems.
Construction activities may.temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblOwn sand, resulting
In temporary problems of dust control; however, development of-this project under the
.. General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts In the area as pavement, roads,
buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation
'.measures shall be implemented to reduce Impacts to less-than-significant levels: ' ·
' City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for * * Page 11
'1) The site shall be treated with Water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by
SCAQMD. and RWQCB) dally to reduce PM~0 emissions, In accordance with
'SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping aa soon as
possible ' .*
2) ·Frontage public streets shall be Swept according to a schedule, established by.
the City to reduce PM~0 emlssions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-
site, T ming may vary depending upon the time of year Of construction;
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind spoeds exceed 25 mPh to
minimize PM~o emissions from the site during,such episodes,
4) chemical s0il,stabillzers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be.applied to
all inactive construction areas that· remain .inactive for 96 hours or* more to
reduce PM~0 emlssiorm,
c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5,1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with
large decreases or withdrawals of water from 'the aquifer, '.The project WOuld not*withdraw
water from the existing aquifer, The site isnot within a geotechnical hazardous area or other
unstable geologic unit or .soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2, Soil types
On-site consist of TvC Soil association aocord!ng to General plan FEIR Exhibit 5,1-3, No.
adverse Impacts are anticipated. "· :
d) The maJority of Rancho Cucam0nga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil
deposits These types of soils are. not consi.de_r, ed to be expansiVe. Soil types on-site consist
of TvC Soil association according [o ~eneral I~mn Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit
5.1-3. These soils are typically Gravelly LoamY Sand. No adverse Iropacts ere anticipated.
e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing.local Sewer system for wastewater '.
disposal. 'No septic tanks or aitematlve wastewater disposal is proposed.
?. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS..
· ' City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for . Page 12
DRC2003-O1130 ·
' ~ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') . '
" would the project result In · safety hazard forI
people residing or worktng in the project am_a7 ...I ,,
g) ' Impair implementation of or physically t,~t~ with I (
an adopted em.ergency response plarl"1 .' I .I I · I
ememanC evacuat,onp an? .... I., I ,, I ,, I I
h) Expose people or structures to a signl;;~a~, ris_k of l (
loss, Inju~J or death Involving wild,~l~cendntflre~l. / I I I
· · ncludng where wildlands are aajacen[ mI I I I I
· u an,,ed arcee or whero re,]den areI I I 1 I
· Intermixed with wlldlands?
a) The project w]it not Involve the transport, use, or' disposal of hazardous meterials. · The City
participates In a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous
Materials Division that Is more comprehensive that any othor in the state. The City has adopted
a Standardized Emergency Management System Mulfi-H~7~rd Furlctiorlel Plan to respond to
chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the
etorege and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste Nil raduse Ihe potential for significant
.. impacts to a level less-thamsignificant No adverse impacts ere expectS.
b) The propOsed project does not include the use of hazardous rnaterlals or volatile fuels. The City
part, pates In a countywide Interagency coalition that is considered a full Se~ice Hazardous
Materials Division that Is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted
a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functtenat Plan to respond to
chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and Iocal regulations COncerning the
storage and handling .of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for '
elgnificant ImPacts to a level less'than-significant-' No adverse impacts ere anticipated.
C) There are no'schocta located within ~ mile of the project site. The projest site is located within
.57 mile of the' nearest existing (Carlton P. Lighffout and Windrow atementmy) or proposed
school (Arbors elementmy). No impacts are anticipated.
d) The proposed proJect Is not listed as a'hazardous waste or substance matarlats site. Resent site
Inspection did not reveal the p.resence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous
materials. No impad is.anUctpated.
e) The site Is not located within an airport land use plan and'Is not withIn 2 miles of a PUblic alrporL
The proje~-t site Is located approximately 3 miles nodherty of the Ontario Airport and is offset
north of the flght path. No Impact is. anticipated.
f) The nearest Private aimtflp; Cable Airport, Is located aPproximately 2 ~ miles to the west of the
Cites westerly limits. No impact Is anticipated..
g). The city's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which Is updated every two years; Includes policies and
procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Disb'ict In the event of a disaster.
· Because the project includes at least two points of publio street access and Is requlrad to comply
with ell applicable City codes, Including local fire ordinances, no adverse impa~S are anticipated.
h) Rancho Cucamonga fames the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-drIvan fire In the Urban
Wlldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according'to the Fire Diatflct
Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project she is not located within a high fire
hazard area according to.Ganerel Plan Exhibit V-7.. ' '
· ' City of. Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study roi- · Page 13
DRC2003-01130. - '
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the
a) Violate any water quality standards'or waste
Substantially deplete groundwata~ supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
.. such that there would be a net deficit In aquifer
~ · volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table
level (e.g., the production rata of pre-existing
nea'rby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing ·land uses or planned uses for
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
the slta or area, including through the alteration.of
the coume of a stream or river, In a manoer, which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
d) Substantially' alter the existing drainage'pattern of
the site or area, including through the alteration of ..
the course .of a stream or .river, or substantially i
increase the rata or amount of surface runoff In a
manner, which would result. In flooding on- or off-
slto?
e) Create or contribute, runoff water which Would
exceed the capacity of existing er planned
stormwatar drainage sYStems or provide substantial
additional sources of runoff?
Otherwise substantiall water ~
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area
as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurence Rate Map er other flood hazard
tt) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures that would impede or redlrest flood
flows?
I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death Involving flooding, including
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by ealche, tsunami, or mudflow?. ( ) ·
--Comments: . .
a) Water and sewer Service is ~rovided by the Cucamonga'Valley Water Distriof (CVWD).
project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of Califomla
Is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
S~stam (NPDE$) permit under Section 402 of' the Clean Water Act. The General
Construction Permit treats any construction activity over t acre as an industrial .activity,'
· requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource
Conlml Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa
Aha Rag on, adm nisters these permits. .. · · '
Conalmoflon activities covered under the State's General construction permit Inctude
remOVal of vegetation, grading, excavating, er' any other' activity for new development or
significant redevalopmenL Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger
· ' · City of Rancho Cucamonga
Initial Study for.. Page 14
DRC2003-01130
mUst Submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) tO obtain coverage under the General PermlL 'The
General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during constructiOn
· activities, including site clearance'and grading:
:. DeVelop'and implement a sto~-m Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would
specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants
from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from
moving off-site.Into receiving waters. ..
.. "Eliminate or reduce' non-storm water dis~arges to storm sewer systems and other
waters of the nation.
· perform Inspections of all BMPs..
Waste discharges Include discharges d'storm'Water and construction project discharges~ A
COnstruction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDE$
permlL Construction project proponents ara required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with
the NPDE$, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepara an SWPPP
during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan 0NQMP) for post-
construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a
WQMP, prepared by RMA on February 21, 2005, that identifies Best Management practices
(BMPs) to minimize Ihs amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage
System after construction. Runoff fi'om dri,~,eways, made, and other Impermeable surfaces
· · · must be COntrolled through 'an on.site drainage system. BMPs Include both structural and
non-structural control' methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water POllutant
levels include detention basins, 0il/grit separators; and porous pavemer~t: Non'clmctural
controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through Implementing Erosion
· and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any
businesses that store and use hazardousmatedals, practices, such as periodic parking lot
sweeping,,can substantially reduce the amount o[ pollutants.entering the storm drain system.
The following mitigation measures WOuld be required to control additional storm water
t. PriOr to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to
Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ($WPPP)
specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPS) that shall be used on-
· site to reduce pollutants during construction actlvitleSentoring.the storm dra!n
system to the maxlmurn extent practlcal~
2. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, Included In the Grading' Plan, and
Implemented for the proposed project that Identifies speclflo measures to control
dh-site and off-elto erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities ere
Initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Include
the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify thetlmlng of grading and
construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced In southern
.. Caitfornla, and b) An Inspection and ma ntenance program shall be Included*to
ensure that'any erosion which doss occur either on-silo or off-elto as a .result of
this project will be corrected through a ramedlatlon or restoration program
within a specified time frame.
· ' 3. During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags Or gravel dikes must
be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the slto when there II
rainfall or other runoff.
.. "
·; City of Rancho CUcamonga
Initial Study for Page 15
DRC2003-01130 __
~.
4; Durlng construction,· to remove pollutants, street cleaning 'will .be performed
prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to. control duet In order to
.p~evant discharge of debris or sedlmant from the sits..
Post- Construction Operational: · .'
S. The developer s~ali Implement' the BMPS Identified In .the Water QualIty
Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by RMA on February'2¶, 2005, to reduce
po lutsnts after construction entering the storm drain system to the .maximum
extent prsctlcel,
6. LandScaping Plans shall Include provlslons for confl'olllng and minimizing the
use of fertlliZers/pestlcldeslherbicldes; Landscaped areas shall be monitored
and malntslned for at least two yearS to ensure adequate coverage and stable
· growth. Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provisions for a minimum of
two years, shall be Submitted to the City for review and approval prior, to the
Issuance of Grading Permlto,
· to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water Is' curren§Y provided from ground water In
b) According
the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates
demand needs until the year 2030... The proposed, pmjeot will not deplete groundwater
supplies, nor will It interfere With recharge because Itis not within an area designated as a
recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The'
development of the sIte will require the grading of the sIte and excavatiOn; hqwever, would ·
not affe~ the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet· below the ground
surface. As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywlde
will ncrease water needs and Is .a slg. nlfic?.t !mpac~;_._h_o~we~e~r,...CWND has plans to meet this
__---.~ -~.~ throunh the cons~ructlorl o[ llJ~urs wa(or mumu~.
"¢) The pmJect Will cause.changeS' In absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and
amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape
proposed on a sIte; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river.
runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle
the flows.. The project design includes landscaping of ell non-hardscape areas to prevent
erosInn. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City
Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, the projeot will'not result In
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-sita. The impact is not cons! .clarad significant.'
.d) The proJect will cause changes In absorption rotes, drainage patterns, and the rate and'
· amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscapa
proposed on a sIte; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. ,NI
runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facllltles~ which have been designed to handle'
the floWs. 'A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City
Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, Inc~mase In runoff from the site will
not result In flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated.
'e) The pmject will cause changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate end'
amount of surface water runoff because of the ~mount of 'new building and hardscape
proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities,
which have been designed to handle the flows.. The project will not result In substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the
Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading permits. Therefore, Increase
" In runoff from the site will.not result In flooding on- or off-site. No Impacts are ehflclpatod.
activities associated with the construction period could result In a temporary increase
0 Grading . . .
in th~ amount of suspended solids In surface flows during a.conourrant storm event, thus
' City of Rancho.Cucamonga
Initial Study for Page 16
DRC2003-01130 . i
resulting In surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant
redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution:
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
prior to Issuance of building permlts, the applicant shall submit to the CRy
Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and Identifying
BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system
to the maximum extant practicable.. The WQMP shall Identify the structural and
.non.structural measures conslstent with the Guidellnos for New Development
and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004.
8. Prior to Issuance of Gradlng or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a
Notlse of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimlnatlon System (NPDES) General Construction Storm .
Water Permit f~om the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that thle
has been obtained (I.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)
shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES.
General Construction permit. ,
g) No housing units ara proposed with. this project. No adverse impacts are expected.
h)The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to Genera! Plea
Exhibit V~. No adverse Impacts ars expected.
I) The Rancho 'cucemonga area IS flood p~otectad, by ea extensive storm drain system
designed to convey a 100-ysar storm event. The system Is substantially Improved and
provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing 'system
includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined
channels, and underground storm drains as shown In General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project
site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5.
No adverse Impacts are expected.. _
'* near the project site; therefore, Impacts from Selche
j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs
and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area .s. lts at the base of the steep
eastam San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams.
Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the
level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debds dame
and levees north of the City, and spread ng grounds both within and norlh of the City.
· g. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the pro./e~~ ' (v')
~ ~'anen~ronmentaleffect? .. ,, ~, )' ~
c .() '
· a) The site is located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day. Creel( Flood control
Channel within the Edison power line corridor and is characterized by a mix of residential,
utility, and institutional development to the north, south, east, and we~t. This project will be of
Initial Study for. City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 17
DRC2003-01130
~nd Institutiona-'~development to the north, south, east, and west~ This project will be of
similar design and size to surrounding development. The project will beCOme a part of the
. larger community.. NO adverse impacts are anticipated.. -. ·
b) The project site land'use designation Is Flood control/Utility Con'idorl The pmpesed project
is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental
protection. As such, no Impacts am anticipated. .
c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan ama.
According to the General Plan Exhibit .IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the
project site Is not within an area of sensitive blologicaI resources; therefore, development will
not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that-
the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General. Plan
Land Use Plan.
t0. MiNERAL RESOURCES. Would the proje~
a) 'Result in the lass of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be Of value to the region and
the residents of the State?
mportant mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan or other land
use lan? ..
a)' The see Is not designated as a State Aggregate· Resources Area according to the City
Genera Plan, Figure IV-I and Table IV-I; therefore, there is no Impa~L
b) The see is i~ot designated by the General Plan~ Figure IV-1 and Table N-I, as e Valuable
mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there Is no impact..
~roJect result In:
a) Ex~ure of Demons to 'or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established In the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground borne vibration, or ground borne noise
levels?
~ermanent'increase In ambient noise
· levels In the projeCt vicinity above levels existing
without the p..~Lect?
.. ~ substantial temporary or periodic Increase. In
ambient noise levels in the proJeqt vicinity above
e) For a project located ~n an airport land use
or, where such'a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public a!fport or public uae airport,
would the preject expose people .residing .or
working In the project area to exceeslve noise
leve~s?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01130 ~ ~ Page 18
I f). For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate ai,:~ip, 'J ( ) I ( ) I ( ) I (~').
would the project expose people residing ;orI ' '1 I
working in the project area to excessive noise I I I I '
· levels? · ' I I I I
· Comments: '
a) The 'prOject site Is Within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to
General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out because of traffic noise along' Base Uno Road;
however, the proposed public storage use would 'not provide long-term exposure .to noise
leVels. No adverse Impact Is expected. '
b) . The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce, grOund borne vibretlone;
As such, no Impaots are anticipated.
c) The primarY'source of ambient noise levels In Rancho Cucamonga Is traffic. The pmpesed
activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to Increase the
ambient noIse levels.wtih~n the vicinity'of'the prOject.
d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, On-sits
· . stationary sources, heavy-duty. COnstruction vehicles, and' construction equipment, will
generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate
. . - the short-tarm noise Impacts:
1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday.
2) Construction o~' grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified In
Development Code Section' 17.02.1204), as measured at the property tin®. The
"developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly nots® level monitoring as
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may
be requlrad by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to
the Building Official within 24 hours; however, If noise levels excsed'the above
standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Planning Department,
If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be
· reduced In Intensity to a level of comPliance with above noise standards or'
halted. · ·
3)' The' perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible In first phase.
The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site
construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the
lransport of construction materials and debris.. The following mitigation measures shall
then be required: · ·
4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hOurs of 8;00 p.m. and 6:30
a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national
holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally
flips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall
prepare a Noise Mitigation:Plan denoting any construction traffio haul routes. To
the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that donor pass sensitive
· land uses or residential dwellings. · ·
citY of RanCho Cucam.onga ·
Initial Study for Page 19.
DRC2003-01130
e) The. site is not located Within an airPort land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public
airport. The site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the ontario Airport and is offset
north, of the flight path. No impact is anticipated.
f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable AirPort, is located approximately 2 ~ miles to the west of
the City's westerly limits. No impact Is anticipated.
a) ' nduca substantiaI population groWth in an area, I
either directly (for example, by proposing n.ewI ·
· ' · homes and bu~i~esses) or Indirectly (for example, I
~,l ~' constmctlor/ of replacamant I ' '
Comment~ ' ..
a) The project is located In a predominantly developed area and will not induce population
growth. Construction activities at the site wtl be shod-term and Will not attract n.e~.
· employees to the area. once constructed, the proposed project will have a I mlted number or
employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing aa a majority of the
employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities, NO Impacts
am anticipated. ·
b) 'Tbe proj s te co;,ta,,,.o ex*sU.g ;ou. ng un . No a Ver-- Ir.Pact expoota,.
~) The prOject site Is vacant land. No Impacts am anticipated.'
· "'" '_..~.~,,~/,u ~dVerse ehVSlcal ir.pacts assoclateo w~m ~r~
eroviston of new or physically a~erod govemme , · I ·
~..,'~e n~d for new or i~hYsical~y altered govemmenr~ l ·
· . e"n;~on~nental Impect~. in .o.~,r to rna.{ntaln e~.epma~e I I
servia retS, response ume or ..mer pe rmanoe l () I ()
. a) The =ite is located on the north Side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control
Channel within the Edison· power line corridor, would be served by a fire station located
· appmxlmately ½ mile fror. the ~)roject site. The project will not require the construction of
· . any new facilities or alteration of any existing fa=ilittes or cause a decline in the levels of
sen, Ice, which could cause the' need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of
Initial Study for .City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-O1130 ... Page 20
approval from the UnEorm Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no
· impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated.
· b) Additional police protection Is not required as the addition of the project will not: change, the ·
·pattem of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase In
property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. '
c) The slfa'is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School .District and the
· Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as
· - prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated.
d) ' The site Is In'a.deveioped area, curren0y served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
nearest park is located % mile from the project site. The project will not require the
construction of any new facilities or altera{ion of any existing facilities or cause a decline In
· the levels of service, which cou d cause the need to conslnJct new facilities. No mpacts are
anticipated.
e) The proPOsed proJec~'Wlll 'utilize existing public facitit!as. The see is In a developed area,
currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project Will .not require the.
construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline .in
the levels of service~ which could Cause the need to construct.new facilities. Cumulalive
development within Rancho Cucamonga Will increase demand for library serVices. According.
to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase In library space under the
General Plan Will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the
cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a
Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The
· proposed proj'ect is consistent with the General Plan for which the Environmental Impact
Repo~ (EIR) was prepared and impacts evaluated.. Since the adoption of the General Plan,
· ' the City has planned.a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping conter of
· ·approximately 22,000 square feet, which is In excess of the projected need of 15,500 square
feet at build-out of the City.
· '14. RECREATION. Wouldtheproje¢~ () () *()
e).. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ·
regional parks or other.recreational facilities euch
' * that substantial physical 'deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelemt~l?
b)' Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) () . (v')
require the construction or expansion of.
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse
· physical effect on the environment? "
a) The site is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucare°riga. The
nearest park, Ellena Park, is located .47 mile from the project site. This project is not
proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an Increase In
the use of parks or other recreational facilities. No impacts are antiCipated.
b) See a) response abOVe. '.
Initial stUdy for · City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01130 . Page 21
CommentS;
a)' The' proposed project Includes the development of outdoor R¥ parking, slx storage, buildings
totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of spproxlmatolY 1,430 square feel
The Rancho Cucamonga Trefflo Model estimates that the total uses will generate 48
dally. As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will
contributa to the trafc load In the Rancho Cuoamonga area. The proposed project ia
consistent with the. General Plan for which the F£1R was prepared, and ImpaCtS eva uatod.
The project Is In an area that ia mostly developed with street Improvements existing or
included In project design. The project will not create a substantial Incroaoa In the number of
vehicle trips, tref~ volume, or congestion at InterseCtions- The project site will be required to
· provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, end sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site
per City roadway 'standards. In addition; the City has established a Transportation
Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits.
Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate
olroulal~t. No impacts are anticipated.
b) The project will generate 12 two-way peak hour trips, which is' less than' 250 two-way peak
hour'trips for non-retail; therefore, is below the threshold of the San. Bemardino Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The project ia In an
area that Is mostly developed with all-street Imp~:ovementa existing. The project will not
negatively Impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be
required to provide street improvements (CUrb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage
of the site. No Impacts are anticipated. '" ' '
O) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario AirpOrt. the site ia Offset north of the
flight path and wil not change air traffic patternS. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The project Is In an area that is mostly developed. The project will b~ req~Jlred to provide'
Im rovements (CUrb, guffer,.and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The
street p .......... ,,~/._. nr da aerous intersections or farming'uses.
project design aoes nm incluae any sharp ~; ........ n. . .
City of Rancho CuCamonga
Initial Study for ' Page 22
DRC2003-O1130
The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design
feature. No Impacts are anticipated.
e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency Vehicles a~d will, theref°re,
not create an inadequate e~mergency access. No impacts are anticipated.
0 The project design has adequate parking in compliance- with .standards of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code and will,- therefore, not create an Inadequate parking
capacity.' No impacts are anticipated.
g) .The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting
transportation and vehicle trip reduction {e.g., bus bays, bicycle recks, carpool parking, etc.).
16. '[)TILITIEB AND .SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the () .() () . (v")
proj
a) Exceed Wastewater tmatmant requlrarnente of the~
applicable Regional water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
· cause slgr~;~,ca~ env;~u~r.e~tal effects?"
· · · . c) Require or result in the cu~,~,u~;u- of new storm ( ) () (.)
water drainage f~cillites or.expansion of .existing .
fa~lities, the construction 'of which could cause ..
si~.;;;cant environmental
d! Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () . ( ) ()
the projeot from existing enflflemente and
' ~ resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
e) .Result In a determination by the wastewator (). () () (v')
t~eatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project, that It has adequate capacity to serve the
projects Projected demand In addition, to the
· provlder's existing co~-,r~ltments? ' ' '
0 Be. served by a landfill wl~ ~ufficient permitt~. - ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
capacity to accommodate the pmjeot's solid waste
disposal needs? ·
g) Comply w~th Federal, Stale, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) . (v')
regulu[io~s related to-solid waste?.
a) The proposed project Is served by the CW/VD Sewer system, which has'waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment :plant located within Rancho
Cucamonga. The project Is required to meet the requirements .of the Santa Aha Regional
Water.Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No Impacts are anticipated.
b) The' p~-oposed project Is served'by the CVVVD sewer sYStem, which has waste treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga '.
and RP-1 located within City Of Ontario, neither Of which are at capacity. The project Is
required to meet the requirements of the Santa Aha Regional Water Quality Control Board
regarding wastawatar. No Impacts are anticipate~l. ..
c). Ail runoff will-be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to
· handle the itows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Offt~al
..
Initial'Study for ' C!ty of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 23
DRC2003-01130
and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact Is not considered
significant.
d). The'project is served bY the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply
available to the City of Rancho Cucam0nga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated.
e) '~l'he proposed project Is served by the cV~ND Sewer system, which has waste'treated by the
Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 I~eatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga
and RP;t located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are
anflclpated~
0 Solid waste disposal wiJl be provided by the current city contracted hauler who disposes the
refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal
g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding Solid
waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga COntinues to implement waste reduction procedures
consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no Impacts are anticipated.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife ~pectes, cause a fish or
wildlife population to .drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to e Imlnato a plant or animal
· community, reduce the number or restriot the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate Important examples of the .major periods
of Califomla hlst~
'"'""'----"~oes the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(-CumulatiVely considerable' means that the
· incremental'effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future
~v~loes the project have environmental effeots that
II cause substantial adverse effects on human
~ 'bein s eitherdl orindirecti .'
e) The site is not loCated In an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the CRy of
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally;, the area .surrounding the site is
· developed, Based on previous development and street improvements, it Is unlikely that any
endangered or rare species-Would Inhabit the site.
b) If the proposed prOject were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the
sl{e In accordance with the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General
Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a.
Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-
out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General
Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland,
quality, the acoustical envimnmant, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources.
Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they .would not
' ~/~:i iii" ... ' "' ' Cityof Rancho Cucamonga
Intal Study for :::.~ . ' '
DRC2003-0i 130~;' ',~ , ~ page 24
. · . reduCe impacts to less-than-significant levals' As such, the. City adopted a Statement of
Overridi~ig Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan
update ~against th~ significant unavoidable adveme: impacts (CEQA' Guidelines Section
~15092 and 15096(h)), . These'benefits include less overall traffic volumes, by deveioplng
mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open
sPa~e..With these findings and the Statement of Ove~iding Considerations, no further
disCUssiOn or evalUation °f cumulative impacts is required.'.
· c) ' D~velopment of the site Under the proposed land use change' would not cause substantial
adverse effects On human beings, either directly or i.ndir, ecfly, .The..In.}tial. S.tu. dy I.d,e_nt~es
construCtiOn-related emissions of criteria pollutants as nawng a pomntlally slgnmcan~ ~mpa~
.. proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, Impacts
resulflng~from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construCtion activities
were completed. The Initial SfiJdy identified potentially significant impacts associated with
the exposure of people to Increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained In this Initial
Study will ens. ure impacts ara at less,than-significant levels.
EARLIER ANALYSES
" t0the tiering, prOgram EIR, or other CEQA process, one
Earlier' analyses may be used where, pursuant
er more effects have been adequately analyzed .in an eadior EIR or Negative Deciaration per Section
15063(c)(3XD). The. effects dentEied above for this project were*within the Scepe of and adequately
analyzed In the following earlier document(s) pursuant toapp cable legal standards, and such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.' The following earlier analyses
were utilized In completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, planning DeParlment offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
('~) Biological Assessment (ECOlogical Sclencas, November 24~ 2002)
(~/) General Plan FEIR* '
(SCHff200006.1027. Certified OctOber 17, 2001) . .
(,") Mastei Environmental Assessment for the i989 General Plan Update .
· (scH ;[~-88020115,.cartified January 4' 1989) '
Victoria Planned Community EIR ..
(Certified May.20, 1981)
Initial Study for' City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2003-01130 'Page 25
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknOwledge that I have
read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or
proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed roitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the
· effects to a point whem.,r, te~rly n~o sj~ant environmental effects would occur, t / --
.. "' City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The folloWing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review In accordance with the
California Environmental Qualiiy Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Pubflc Resources Code.
project File No~: Developmant Code Amandmant DRC2003-01144 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003'01130
Public Review period CloSes: April 13, 2005
Project Name: prOject Applicant: Southern California Edison Company
Project Location (also see attached map): North side of Sase Line Road, east of Day Craek Flood Control
Channel within the Edison power line corridor- APN: 1089-031-12.
Project Description: A request to amend 'Development Code sectio~ 17.16.030 to change the Utility Corridor
District use regulations to allow public storage facilities including outdoor RV parking and a request for a public
storage facility on 5.38 acres in the Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage
buildings totaling 71,175 square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet to be
located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within the Edison
power line .corridor. Related files: Tree ·Removal Permit DRC2004-00847 and Preliminary Review
DRC2002-00704.
FINDING
This Is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
· Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and la
prOposing this Negative Declaratton based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the' project may.have a signlfmant
effect on the envlranmenL
[] The nitia Study identified potentially.significant effects but:
(1) Revisions In the project plans· or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects toa po!nt where cleady no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There.is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environmenL .
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be rOqulred,
Reasons to support this finding are included In the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
re ated documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning .Department at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public Is Invltsd to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
Data of Determination · Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO. 05-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, TO AMEND
SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC STORAGE
FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING, IN THE UTILITY.
CORRIDOR DISTRICT? AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
.1.' The 'City of Ranch° cucam°nga filed .an appl cafi°n f°r Development C°de Ame'rtdment
DRC2003-01144, as described in the title of th~s Resolution. Hereinafter n this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
nl 2005, the Planning Commission. of the City o.f Ran .cho
' 2. On the 13th day of Ap ! ........... ~;.-ofion and concluded sa,d heanng
Cucamonga conducted a duly nofice;I puoqc neanng on mu
on that date.
3~ All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
· t'ntial evidence presented' to this commission d.urin, g th.e. abov.~
2. Based upon the subs _ ........ ....... o,.a oral stat reoorts, together
referenced public hearing on April 13, 2005, ~nc~ua~ng w.,,=- .....
public testimony, this commissi°n hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to preperty Iccated within the City;, and"
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
· rial ewdence prese'nted to this commission during the above-
3. Based upon the substan ' - .......... · forth in paragraphs t and 2
referenced public hearing and upon the specit~c t.;nalngs o~ ~a~.= ==,.
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
ant does not conflict with the Land Use Policies.of the General Plan
a: This amendm ........... -'-, :-. ~ ,..anner consistent with the General Plan
and will prov,de for development, wttmn me aJ=u~, ,. .... . . ·
and with related development; and
b. .This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;.
and ' 'c
The ro osed amendment Will not be detrimental to ~e pubh health, safety, or
c. · · P! .P --' .... ,-,~.,. Or imnrovemants in the vicinity;, and
welfare or matena ly njun0us tv pru~,=, ,,~o r .
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
PLANNING C°MMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-26 .
DRC2003-O1144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA : ..
April 13, 2005 '
Page 2 . ·
e. The proposed amendment'is in conformance with the General Plan.
: 4. Based upon. the facts and information .contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports ~ncluded for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a Significant effect upon the environment and recommends.the City Council adopt the
Mit gated Negative Deciaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incoq3omted herein by
this reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;'that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declarati°n identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects will be reduced
to a less than significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component of the project
that involves development approval for a public storage use on a specific site and by the imposition
'of site specific mitigation measures as applications for self-storage fecilifies, are approved in the
future..
Pursuant to'the provisions Of section 753.5(c) of T~e 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows:' In considering the record as a wholes the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative. Declaration for the project, there is. no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Furtherl based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and eXhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Tflle 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations.
5.. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs .1, 2, 3, and 4 'above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144
by the adoption of the affached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Seci'etary to this Commission shall certify to the.adoption of this ResolUtion.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005..
pLANNi'NG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Rich Macias, Chairman ·
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary __ .
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-26
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 13. 2005
Page 3
I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and r~gulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 13th day of April 2005, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 'COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO.
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,' APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND
SECTION 17. i6.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC
STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING,
IN THE .UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING
'FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. ' Recitals.,
1. On ,April 13, 2005, the Planning,c°mmission of the City of Rancho C~Jcemonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced DRC2003-01144
and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.' 05-**, recommending that the
City Coundl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Code Amendment.
2; On *****, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance. - ·
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
~: This.City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on *****, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically, finds as follows:
a. 'The application applies-to property loCated within the' City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a signifiCant impact on the
environmenL
c. This amendment does not conflict ~vith the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and Will provide for development, within .the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related develoPment; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development
Code; and
e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the ·public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
- SECTION~3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports' included for the environmental
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.'
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
assessment for the application, the City Council finds 'that there is no Substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect upon'the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. '1'~. at the Mitigated Negative Declaration has b. een prepared, in__c_o_m.pllan..ce..wlth
the California Enwronmental Quality Act of 1970, as amendec~, and the State CEMA guloe~nes
promulgated thereunder;, that sa d Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment Of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the .Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects will be
reduced to a less than significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component
of the project that involves development approval for'a public storage Use on a specifiC site and
by the imposition of site specific m tigation, measures as applications for self-storage facilities
are approved in the future.. . .
.c pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title ;14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In Considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse' impact upon wildlife resources or the. habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the sUbstantial evidence contained In the Mitigated
'Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City
Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse
effe~ as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: The. City Of Rancho Cucamonga DevelOpment Code is hereby amended to
change SECTION !7.16.030, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A.'
sECTION 4: If .any section, subsection, sentence, .clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
· Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless
of the. fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, pht'ases, or words might
· subsequently be declared invalid or.unconstitutional or preempted by. subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
cirCUlated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. Califomia.·
/??
EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL· ORDINANCE NO.
i7.16.030 Use regulations. .
Uses listed in Table 17116.030(A) shall be alloWable in one or more of the open space districts as
indicated in the columns beneath each district. Where indicated with the letter 'P,' the use shall be
a permitted use in that district. Where indicated With the letter "C,' .the use shall be a conditional
use subject'to the conditional use permit process. In the event there Is difficulty In categorizing a '
given use in one of the 'districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 use determination
shall be followed. All uses are subject to the development review process as described In Chapter
17.06. The city planner may approve accessory uses and structures, .and agricultural uses
involving no mprovements under the minor development review process.
Table t 7.;16.030(A)
USE REGULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS
........ I District
u. I.qs .... IFc IUc
1. single-family dwellings (not to exceed an average density
of ! unit pe~ 40 aores): P -' -
2. Caretaker quarters:
a. Permanent · P P P
b. Temporary .................. I .C ..I c. I c
3. Home occupations:
4. Accessory structures (such as detached garages,
carports, cabanas, guest houses, bam~, storage sheds,
corrals): .
a. Related to on-site slng!e-fa_rnll~'dwelllng I P I - [ -
.. b. Not related to on-site dwelling P. . - ' -
5. Agricu tural uses:
· p P P
~ . a. Row crops, truck gardens
:1 b. pent'storage or propagation ..... P' P P
t c' ' Orchards' vineyards' Christmas and °ther tree J I J
· p P ..P
farms ·,
P P P
d. Community gardens ..
e. Greenhouses P ' P P
[ f. Livestock grazing, breeding (no feed lots) . P P P
g. Hydroponic culture · P P P '
' h.' ' On-site sales of products grown on site ' i P. I P ' I P
I6. Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, columbadums,
and related uses: C - - - ..
7. Wildlife preserves and sanctuaries: P P P
8. Forest ma ntenanca tacilities~renger station: P P P .
9. Renreat~onal uses: ·
a. Parks, picnic areas, playgrounds P P P '
b. Hiking, biking, equesMen trails P. P P
F c. · Gresnways ' P P P
EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY couNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
d. Golf courses I C I C C
e. Riding schools (equestrian) C' ; C' I ' c
.......... :1 c" IC ..... Ic
f. Commercial stables
g. country C!U_b.~nd [elated Us..e~-. t c I c.I c .
10, Preservation and use of h storic landmarks and related I I · I I '
uses such as museums, art ga! eries and food services ·
to accommodate on-site uses: ' C
J11. FI°odc°ntmi'structure;a~dfadlities: ' J"'P .I P' I P '
~12 LIght vehicle parking and stOrage in areas sub=ian{ a y . ! '
i3 Ut tv';~h~i~fi0r~s ire at~d equ' pment and struc'~ures) c ' c c
· surrounded by industrial uses:: ' . , . :1 ' - · I C.. I '. C .
:J 14. Public Storage and Recreational Vehicles~
p = Permitted Use
C = Conditional Use Permit required
(Ord. 211 § 6 (part), 1983)
Not permitted Within the Etiwanda North Specific plan Area.
. /??
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01144
SUBJECT PROPERTIES .'
300 FT.NOTICE DRC2003-01144
3000 0 - 3000 6000Feet ~~
RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
· A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT DRC2003-01130 FOR A PUBLIC STORAGE FAClMTY INCLUDING
RV STORAGE ON 5.38 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF DAY CREEK FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL WITHIN THE EDISON POWER ·LINE CORRIDOR, IN THE
UTILITY .CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF- APN: 1089-031-12.
A. Recitals.
1. Southern California Edison filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit
DRC2003-01130, as described in the title of this Resolution.* Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subjeCt Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. .On the 13th day of April 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning commission
· of the city of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, ·
Part A, of this Resolution am true and correct.
· 2. Based upon.' the'subst.,antial evideice presented to this Commission during the abov. e-
referenced public heanng on Apnl 13, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with
pubiic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a.' The application applies to a 5.38 ac~e property Io .c~..ted on the north side of Base
Une Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control channel, within the Edison power line corridor with a
street frontage of 277 feet and I°t depth of 859 feet, and which was previously used as. a plant
nursery;, and
· b. The property to the north of the subject site is addit onai Utility Con~dor, the property
to the south consists of Base Une Road and Utility Corridor;,' the property to the east is San
Bemardino County Maintenance Building, a temporary Fire Stat on, and household waste canter, and
'the property to .the west is Day Creek Flood Control Channel and Utility Corridor;, and
The application proposes construction of six buildings totaling 71,175 square feet~
plus a manager's office.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and
2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 2
a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of. the
Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
· · b. The prOposed use~' together with the conditions applicable thereto, will .not be
detrimental to the ·public health, safeb/, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
'The proposed use complies with each of the applicable Pr°visions of the
Development Code.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports ncluded for the environmental assessment for
the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon'the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this referenca, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. · That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the. Planning Commission; and, further, this
commission has reviewed and considered the information COntained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been.
reduced to a level that is less than signifiCant by the imposition of mitigation measures on the
component of the project that involves development approval for a pub c storage use on a specific
site. The sEe-specific mitigation measures imposed on the development approved with this project
are listed below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife' resources orthe habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of T~e 14 of the Califomia code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each'and every condli~ion set forth below
and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
1) Along the perimeter walls, provide vine pocket openings sufficient to
.allow for coverage of.the exterior wall surface to minimize potential ·
graffiti.
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005 ..
Page 3
2) All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
3) The approval of this appliCation is contingent upon City Council
approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144.
Enaineerin{3 Department
1)Base Line Road shall be improved in accordance with City "Major
Divided Arterial Street" standards as required and including:
a) protect eXisting curb and guffer, as required.
b) Provide curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV streeflights,
and street trees.
c)Protect eXisting' R26(s) signs along Base IJne Road or replace as
required.
d) The main driveway of the project shall be a right-rum in and
right-tum out only and shall be the commercial type per City
· Standard 101, Type C.
e) No median opening will be permitted on Base line Road.
2) The existing overhead Utilities (telecommunications and electrical,
except for the 66 kV electrical) on. the project side of Base line Road
shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of the easterly
bounda~J to the first pole off-site west of the Day Creek Channel, prior
to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs
first. All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at
the same fim~. The developer may request a reimbursement
agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding .
from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street.
-. If the developer fails to submit ,~aid reimbursement within 6 months of
the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the
developer to reimbursement shall terminate..
· 3) The existing Base Line Road median shall be landscaped from the
existing, landscaped portion of the median (constructed under· Tract
16051) up to the median nose fronting the project, per City Standards,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer may request a .
reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost ~
median landsCaping from future development as it occurs on the.
opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said
reimbursement agreement within six months of the improvements being
accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall
terminate.
4) The emergency access shall be a limited access curb per City Standard
105-C. Remove the proposed drive approach. The area between the
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 -; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 4
aCCess curb and the curvilinear sidewalk shall be rockscaped and the
material to be installed in the area between the sidewalk and the
property line shall be determined during plan check.
5) Additional parkway landscape easement shall be required for the Base.
Une Road Beautification Master Plan.
6), ' Within the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) area, landscaping
shall be installed according to current City standards, similar to the
landscaping nstalled with Tract 16051 to'the west.'
7) Conduit for a future fiber optic cable link shall be installed within the
parkway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8) Orange Empire ~cres Map Book 20/1 dedicated an alley and Railroad
Avenue South adjacent to this property, process a street vacation and
incorporate the land within this development.
9) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan 0NQMP), t° the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best ·Management
practices (BMPs) on the grading plan..
Environmental Miticiatlon
Air QualEy
1) ' All COnstruction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
COndition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall
ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per manufacturers' specifications,. Maintenance records
shall be available at the COnstruction site for City verification..
2) Prior to the issuance of any' Grading Permits, the developer shall
submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule
and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide
evidence that I°W'emlssion mobile construction equipment will be
utilized, or that their use Was investigated and found to be infeasible for
the project. Contractors shall also COnform to any COnstruction
measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards'
noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints andcoatings shall be applied
either by hand or high volume, IOW'pressure spray.
4)Ail asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1108.
5) Ail construction equipment Shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402and
403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions:
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27 .
DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
· April 13, 2005 . .
Page 5
Reestablish ground 'cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering..
· Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
· phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
: erosion Over extended periods of time.·
· Schedule activities to minimize .the amounts of exposed
excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
· Dispose of surplus excavated material in aCCOrdance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
· : · ' by the City if
· · Sweep streets according to a schedule establ,shed
silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a
result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of
year of construction.
· Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e~, wind speeds
· ' exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403
requirements.
· Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul bucks or
cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Qualit3f Control Board
[RWQCB]) daily to reduce F ne Particulate Matter (PMto) emissions, in '
accordance with $CAQMD Rule 403.
7) 'Chemical Soil-stabilizers (approved by ScAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that. remain inactive for 96
hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions.. '
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or dean alternative fuel.
powered equipment where feasible. ·
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction'grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
not in use.
10) All 'industrial and commercial fact ities shall post signs requiring that
bucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10
minutes).
1'1) All indust~al and commercial facilities shall'designate preferential
parking for vanpools. · ·
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORN A EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 6
12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees
shall .be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in
conspicuous areas.
.13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees
shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the
Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible.
14) Ail residential and commercial structures shell be required to
incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning,
appliances, and water heaters.
15)Ail 'residential and commercial structures shall be required to
incorporate thermal pane windows and weathor-s~pPing.
Cultural Resources
' 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or'
during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to
monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect
or preserve them for study. With the assistanco of the archaeologist,
the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
· Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from
demolition Or significant modification without an opportunity for
the City to establish its archaeological value,
· Consider establishing previsions to require incorporation of
archaeological Sites within new developments, using theirspecial
qualifies as. a theme or focal point.
· Pursue educating the public about the area'$ archaeological
heritage.
· Propose mitigation measures and reCOmmend conditi°ns of
approval, to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,
important, and unique prehistoric resources, following approp~ate
CEQA guidelineo.
· Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting
the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources
within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,
with' original illustrations, to the San Bemardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent archi~ing.
2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preCOnStruction field survey of
the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that
will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation
measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN. CALIFORNIA EDISON
.April 13, 2OO5
Page 7
Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include,
but not be limited to, the following measures:
.' Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allOW
the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the
site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
· Should fossils be fOund within an area being cleared or graded,
divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has
completed salvage, f construction personnel make the
discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert
construction and notify the' monitor of the find.
· Submit a summary report to the. City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Transfer co ected specimens with a copy of the report to the San
Bemardino County Museum.
Geology and Soils
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions,
in accordance With SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought
resistant landscaping as soon as possible.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule
established by the 'city to reduce PM~o emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may Vary depending upon the
time of year of construction.
3)Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes.
4) chemical soil stab izers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inaGtive for 96
hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions.
t-~/ology and'Water QuelEy . · .
1) Prior to'issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant Shall submit to
'Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) specifically identi~ing Best Management Practices (BMPs)
that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction
activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent
practical.
2)' An Erosion Control' Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading
Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific
measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground
disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This
Erosion Control Plan shall inclUde the following measures at a
pLANNING COMMISSION-RESOLUTION NO. 05-27
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005 ·
Page 8
minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize'
soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b)
An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure
that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of
this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration
program within a specified time frame. ·
3) During construction, temporary berm$ such as sandbags or gravel
dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the
site when there is rainfall or other runoff.
4) During .construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be
· performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to
control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from
the site.
5) The develoPer shall implement the BMPs identified in the water Quar~/
Management Plan (WQMP) praparad by RMA on February 21, 2005, to
reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to
the maJdmum extent practical.
6) Landscaping Plans shall include Provisions for controlling and
minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped
areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to
ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas,
including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of
Grading Permits.
7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the
City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description.
and identifying BMPs that will.be used on-site to reduce pollutants into
the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP
shall identify the structural and non-structural measures ccnsistent with
the Guidelines ifor New Development and Redevelopment adopted .by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga in Jun· 2004.
8) Prior to issuance of Grading 'or Paving Permits, the applicant shall
obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General
Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water· Resources
Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copyofthe
Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the
City Building Offidal for coverage under the NPDES General
Construction Permit.'.
PLANNIN(~ cOMMISSiON RESOLUTION NO. 05;27
DRC2003-01130 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 9
Noise
1) Construction or grading shall not take place ~etween the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, inciudin Saturday, or at any
· time on Sunday or a national holiday.
2) Construction or grading noise levels shell not exceed !he standards
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at
the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform
weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code
Section i7.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the
Building. Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the
Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the
above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the
Planning Department. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then
construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of
· coropliance with above noise standards or halted.
3)The perimeter block'wali shall be constructed es early as possible in
the first phase.
4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used
for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the
construction site), then the deve oper sha prepare a noise mitigation·
plan denoting any COnstruction traffic haul routes. To the extent
feasiblei the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive
land uses or residential dwellings..
6. The Secretary to this Commission Shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2005.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: _
Rich Macias, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
~edify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
commission held on the 13th day of April 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: "- . .
pLANNiNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO; 0~27
DRC2003-01130 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
April 13, 2005
Page 10
AYES: · COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
MiTIGATIo y °f Ranch° cucam°'ng'
MONITORING .
PROGRAM
Project File No,=' Develc;pment Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 end Conditional Use permit
DRC2003-O1130
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in ~mplement~ng the mitigation
measures identified In the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Rel~ort) for the
above.listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that'
adopted mitigation measures a.re implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code)~
P'rogram Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as Impact mitigation measures are recorded with the ac'don and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the prejecL
2..A-procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates Who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be rePOrted. . .
3. The MMP has been designed .to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses,' changes, to · compliance procedures, may be. necessary based .uPOn
recommendations by those responsible for the program,
Program Management - The MMP will be'in place through all phases of the projecL The project
planner, assigned by the city Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
. and proper action is taken on each mitigation, Each City department shall ensure compllanceof the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that.department.
Procedures - The following stepSlwil! Se folloWed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. . ·
1. A'fee covering all costs and expenses including any consultants' fees, incurred by.the City In
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the' applicant.
2, A MMP Reporting 'Form will be prepared for each potentially significant Impact and its
corresPOnding mitigation'measure identified in the Mitigation MonitoringCheckllst, attached.
hereto. Th s procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and ·
to Whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and rePOrting documentation will
be 'kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
. project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
'City Of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency ;.
.(Planning Department) ".
10500 Civic Center Drive
'Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 ; .
Mitigation Monitoring Program
DRC2003-01144 AND DRC2003-01.130
Page 2
3; ' ApproPriate specialists Will I~e retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff'S ii needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitOr specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate-written approvals to the project planner.
4. The' project Planner Or responsible City department will approve, by signature and data, the
completion of each action.item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for COmpliance, no further action is required for the specific phase ~
development. ..
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form. : :
6. Unanticipated Circumstances may arise requiring, the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project Planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
. An MMP Reporting Form willbe COmpleted bythe project planneror responsible Citydeparlment
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, cOnstruction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the. authority to Stop the wonk of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wrlttan
notification has been issued. '['he project planner or responsible City depari~ient also has the
authority to ho d certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not ocourring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all m tigation measures are implemented..
8. Any conditions (mitigation)· that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the .
applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds
shall be used by the CItyto retain COnsultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report
on the 'm flgation measure for the required period of time. . · '
9. In those instances requiring Iong-tarm project monitoring, the applicant shall Provide the cit~
· with a plan for momtonng the m t gation activ ties at the project site and reporting the monitoring.
results to lhe City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
· COnform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or ·
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. .
=,,,~=~;ur~ MUplliURINGCHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) '.
project File NO.: DRC2003-01130 · ' Applicant: Southern Edison Calif°mla
Initial.Study prepared by: Larry HenderSon Date: February 22. 2005 · :
NI construction equipment'Shell be maintained.in good CP C Review of p ;ms NC 2/4
operating condition so as to redUce operational
emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment IS being properly sewlced and
maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available et the '
construction site for City verification.
Prior to the issuance of any G~a~i.g Pem~lts, the CP/BO' C Review of plans C 2
developer shall submit construction plans to the City '
denoting the proposed schedule and projected
equipment use. Construction contractors shell provide
evidence that Iow-emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was
.investigated and found to be Infeasible for the project.
Contractors shall also conform to any construction . '
measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality ·
Management District (SCAQMD) as Well as City '
Planning staff. .
NI paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Revlewofplens NC '" 2/4
performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.
Paints and coatings shall be appltsd either by hand or
high volume, Iow-preasure spray;
Nlasph~ltshatimeatorexceadpeffmmance~,,-,~.~',~ BO B Review of plans NC 2
noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. '
NI construction equipment shal comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans NC 2/4
Rules· 402 and 403.' Additionally, ~dractom shall
Include the following provisions: ' '
· Reestablish ground cover on the cons~.site BO C Review of plans NC 2/4
· Phase grading to prevent the' susceptibility of large BO C Rovtsw of plans NC 2/4.
areas to erosion over extended periods of time.
· Schedule 8ctlvltlee to ~;i~;.,lz~ the amounts of C Review of plans NC 2/4
exposed excavated soil dUring and 'after the end.of
· Dispose of surplus eXcavated material BO C Review of plane. A
accordance with local ordinances and use eeu~l . 4
engineering practices.
· SWeep streets according to a schedule established ! BO C During A
by the City. if silt is cerried over to adjacent public 4
thomughfaree or 'occurs as a result of hauling, constoJcflon
· Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of
,constructlon~
· .!SUspend grading ope[-.[;ons during high v,1~G~ (i.e.. BO C . ' Dur~g . A 4
· wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) In accordance with construction
SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements'
· Ma]i~;a;, a minimum 24-inch freeboa,-~ ratio on ~ BO C During A 4
haul tracks or cover Payloads using tall:)e or other
suitable .means. · Construofion
The. s!ta shall be ~-~;,~cl with water or other BO C Dudng ' ' A 4
soil-stabilizing agent (approved by sCAQMD and constructton
Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dally
to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in ·
:accordance with $CAQMD Rule 403. '
Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4.
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inastJve construction constriction'
areas that remain Inactive for~ 96 hours or more to .. ·
reduce PM~o emissions.
The construction contractor shall utilize electric or dean BO C "' Re~ of plans NC ' ' · 4
alternative fuel-p0wered equlpmant where feealble. .
The 'canstmctlon contrac~-or shall ensure that BO C Revtsw0fplans NC. 2/4
conslrUctlon-gredlng plans Include a i~,;~=mant that work
crews yell shut off equipment when not In use.
Ail Industrial and commercial facilities shell post Signs BO C Revlew of plans A
requiring that tracks shaft not be left Idling for prolonged 4
periods (i.e., in excess of 10 rclnutes).
Ail Industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C
preferential parking for Vanpcols. · Review of NC 2/3
All Industrial.and commercla! site tenants ~ 50 or CP
more employees shell be required to post beth bus end C Review of plans D. 2/3
Metrolink schedules In Conspicuous areas.
'All industrial and Commercial site tenants with 50 CP C Revlewofplens, D
more employees shall be required to Configure lhelr 2/3
operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to
~he extent reasonably feasible. .
Ail residential and commercial structures~ shall BO
required to inCorporate 'high efficiency/Iow POlluting C/D Review of Plans C 2/4
heating, air Conditioning, appliances, and water heaters.
Ail residential and C~mmerctal' structures shell be BO C/D Revlewof C
to incorporate thermal pane windows and 2/4
weather-stripping. - -
If any. prehistoric archaeological resources am
enCountered before or during grading, the develOPer will
retain a qualified archaeolOgist to monitor construction ~ ·
activities, to take appropriate measures to prefect or "'
preserve them for study..With the assistance of the ..
archaeologist, the Cty of Rancho Cucamonga will: ..
.. 'Enact ;~teHm measures to p~u;,uct undesignated Cp/Bo C Review of report ND 3/4
sites 'from demolition or Significant modification' ~'
witho(Jt an opportunity for the City to establish its .
· archaeological value. . . . .
· Consider establishing previsions to require CP/BO C Revlewof report ND 3/4
· Incorporation of archaeological sites v,~thln new ·
developments, using their special' qualities as a . .
'theme or focal point.
· Pursue educating the public ab)ut lhe area's CP/BO C Review of report ND 3/4
archaCologlcal heritage.
· Propose mitigation measures and recommen~l CP/Bo C Review'of mpa Ti ND ' 3/4.
conditions of approval to eliminate edveme project · -'
effects on significant, Important, and unique
·pre. h. is..todc resources, follOWing appropriate CEQA
guIoellnas.
Prepur. a [echn|ca[ re__~_~.=c..~ ~-,-,,agement report, CP C Re~ of roport ND
documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and
' proposed mitigation of resources within the project
area; Submit one copy of the completed report, with
original illustrations, to the San Bemardino County
Archaeological Information Center for permanent
A qualified pa;eu,,tu;oglst shall conduct a prec~r,=;,~,~-~ CP B Review of repe~t ND 4
field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall
submit a report of findings that will also provide speolfic
recommendations regarding further mitigation measures
(i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be
appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate,
Ihs .program must include, but not be limited to, the
following measures:
· Assign a paleon~o;~,~;ca; monitor, trained and CP B Rovlewofrepert ND 4
! equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with
' minimal constrUction delay, to the site full-fires
., during the Intowal of earth-disturbing activities.
JShould fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report ND 4
or graded,' divert earth-disturbing' activities '
elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.
'if construction perSOnnel make the discovery, the
grading contractor should · Immediately divert
constmc'tion and notify the monitor of the tlnd.
· . submit'a summary report to the Ctiy of Rancho CP D. Review of ropmt D 3
· I Cucamonga. Transfer coliected specimens with a
. copy of the report to the San Bemardlno county
, Museum.
The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4
stab{lizlng agent (app~3Ved by SCAQMD end RWQCB) construction
daily to reduce PM~o emissions, In accordance with
$CAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant
landscaping as soon as possible.
r,u.~uge public st,-eeL~ shall be swept ~=~--.~;ng to a BO C During A'' 4
schedule established, by the City to reduce PM~o construction
emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil
off-site. 'liming may var~ depending.upon the time of
year of consthJctlon.
Grading op6ra[~ons shall be suspehded v.~,e. BO.' C · During ' A
speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions ~ 4
from the site during such episodes, construction
Chemical soil stabl;i/.eiu (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4.
RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction construction
areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to
reduce PM~o'emissions. · ·
Priortolssuanceofgradlngpermlts, thepermltappllcant BO B/c/D Revlewofptens NC 2/4
shall submit to Building Official 'for approval~ St°rm · .
Water Pollution preVention Plan (SWPPP) specifically
Identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that
shall be used on-site to reduCe pollutants during
construction activities entering the stetro drain system to
the maximum extent pmcticel.
5 of'8
An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, Included In BO B/C/13 Review of plans NC 2/4
the Greding Plan, and Imp!emented for the proposed
project that Identifies specific measures to control on-
site and off-site erosion from the time of ground
disturbing activltlea are InlUated through Completion of
grading. This. Ereelon Control Plan shall· Include the
following measures at a minimum: a) Specify t~e timing
of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to
rainy periods experienced. In southern California, and b)
and maintenance program shall be
to ensure that any erosion which does occur
either on-site Or off-site as a result of this project will be
corrected lhr0ugh'a remedlatlon or restoration program
within a specified time frame. · '
Dudng construction, ~e.~p~raF~ be,~a such as BO B/C/D Revtewofplana NC 2/4
sandbags or. gravel dikes must be used to prevent
~siS~. arge of debris or sedlmant from the site wflan there
ralnfell or other runoff. · · .
During cons~,~ction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Revtew~ plarm NC 2/4 "
cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and
after the use of water trucks to control dust In order to '
prevent discharge of debris or Sediment from the site.
The developer shall Implement ~e BMPs identified In CE B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4
the Water Qualib/Management Plan (WQMP) prepared
by RMA on February 21,2005, to reduce pollutants alter
:construCtion entering the storm drain system to the
maximum extent practical. ·
I-'~ndscoplng Plane shall Include 'pmvisloea ~ BO B/C/13 Review of plans NC . 2/4'
controlling and minimizing, the use "
be monitored and maintained for at least two years to . · ·
ansura adequate'coverage and stable gruwlh. Plans for .. .
these areas,, including monitoring .provisions for a
minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for .
review and approval prior to the issuance of G .mdlng
Permits.
6of8
ce o u Iding permits, the applicant shall CE B/CE) Review of plans NC .i - ' I 2/4
submit to the City Engineer for apProval of a WQMP, ' ..
~eas. ures consistent with the Guidelines for New . . )1 -.
Including a project description and Identiyng BMPs that .
will be used on-site to reduce' po utanto Into the storm ' . .
drain system to the maximum extent practlcab e.' The · ·
WQMP shall Identify the sthJctural and non-structural ·
~Rae~e_~pm_ ect and R~.evelopment adopted by the City of
with Obtaining coVerage under the National Pollutant ·
. Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General . · · .
ConstrUction Storm Water Permit from the State Water · ..
B_.uilding Official for coverage Under the NPDES General , P .
ResoUrces Cohtml Board. Evidence that this has been ' . . .
obtained (l.e., a copy of' the Waste Discharger's
Identification Number) shal be submitted to the City~ ., '
Coi~sb~c'~oi~orgradlngshallnottakeplacebebveanthe' BO C During . ... '. 44
hours of 8:00 'p:m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, . construction '1
Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or e
national holiday, .
Cons~c;~o~a or ~a~;~0 noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During
standards specified in Development Code Sectlo~ construction
i?.0:~.120-D, as measured at the property line. The
developer shal h re a consultant to peri=grin week y
noise eve monitoring as specified In Development ..
Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may
be required by the Building Official. Said consultant · ·
shall report their findings to the Building Ofi~tal within 24
hours; however, If n01se levels exceed the above
standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify
the Planning Department. If noise levels exceed the,
abOve standards,'then construction activities shall be . . '
reduced in Intensity to a level of compliance with above .
noise standards or halted.
7of8 . .
The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A
. as possible in the first phase
Haul track dellve~ shall not take place bekeeen the PO/BO C During A 4/7
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6~30 8.m. on waskday~, cdnstrucflon
.. Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a
national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for
hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (Counting both to .
and from the Construction site), then the developer shall ·
prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any
construction traffic haul routes.. To the extent feasible,
the plan shall denote haul mutes that do not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
Key.to Checklist Abbreviations ..
A - With Each New .Development A - O~-~lte I. nspes~3n 1 - Withhold R.eco~datlon of Final
CP - .C~ Planner er designee B - Prior To Constructioa B - Other Ag Pem~t
- CE-CityEnglnaerordeslgnna'--'~ . C-'~-'~houtConsthjc~erl -- C-Plan.Chesk
·
'-
. . . 5 - Retain Depeslt er Bonds__
6- Revoke CUP
8of8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
3TANDARD CON.DITIONS
:OJECT #: DR02003-01130
~BJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLICANT: souTHERN cALIFORNIA EDISON
CATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE ·LINE ROAD, EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL
.L OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY. TO YOUR PROJECT.
PLICANT sHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR
MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
General Requirements.
1. The applicant'shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __/ /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant Shall reimburse' the. City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of sUch action. The City may, at its SOle
discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation
· shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Copies of the signed planning Commission Resolution of Approval NO. 05-27, Standard / I
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the pans (full size). The
sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the construction/grading activities and
· are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architact. ..
Time Limits · · '
1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Developmant/Design Review approval shall expire .__/__1
building permits ara not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date
of approval. No extensions are allowed. '
Site Development
1. The site Shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include I I
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grad ng on file Jn the Planning Department,. the conditions conta ned herein, and Development.
Code regulations.' · ·
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ..~__1 I
Of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. -- --
Coma~etlon [
oCCUpancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Cede and · I /
3.
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with, Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Department to show compliance,. The buildings shall be inspected for'compliance prior to
occupancy!' .
4. All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation; and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved.
use has commenced, whichever comas itrsL
· 5. Approval of this request ShaJl not waive compliance with all sections ~fthe DevelOPment Code, all. I /
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
6. A detailed On-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~__ I
by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall Indicate style, Illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to
adversely affect adjacent properties.
7. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards.' The itnal design, locations; and ...~/ /.
the number of trash receptacles shall be.subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the
Issuance of building permits.
8. .All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as iransformere, AC condensers, etc., shall be .~/
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combinatiOn of.concreta
or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single-
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed i~ underground vaults.
9.'All building numbers and individual units shall be Identified Irt a clear and concise manner,
including proper Illumination.
10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanentty maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance sha be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior .to
the issuance 'of building permits.
D. Building Design .'
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or .~/~/_
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered f~om.adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Deparlment. Such screening shall be architecturally
· integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City planner. Details
shall be Included In building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular AcceSs (Indicate details on' building plans)
· 1. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho __
. Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum..around space
In front of the gate and a sepa .rata visitor lane with call box to avoid care.stacking into the public
right-of-way.
2. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any pa~king space abuts ..__/ ·/_
· a building, wa, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide. · ' ' I
3. All parking lot landscape Islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall ...._/
I
contain a 12-inch we!k adjacent to the.parking stall (including curb). ·
2
Cc~oletio~
4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, I I__
and exits shall be striped per City'stsndards.
Landscaping
t. A detailed landsCape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in I I
the Case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for C~ Planner.review and approval prior to the issuance of. building permits or prior
· final map approval.in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Wtihinparkinglots, treas shall be planted at a mte of one15-ga ontreaforeverythreaparklng '--/_~/
stalls..
3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public'vieW adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ..._/.__/
. ' lea per 30 linear feet of building.
4.' Ail private slopes of 5 feet or mOre in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1.__./..__/
slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required bythis section shall include a permanent rrlgatinn system to be
.. installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. 'Ail private slopes In excess of 5 feat, but less than 8 feet in vertiCal height and of 2:1 or greater ...__/.__/
slope shall be landsCaped and'irrigated for.erosion control and to soften their appearance as ·
fellows: one 15-gallon or larger size trea per each 150 sq. ft~ of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq. ft. Of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, Slope banks
in excess of 8 feat In vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ff. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted In
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent Irrigation. system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy~
6. For multPfemily residential and non-residential development; prop~ ownem are responsible for .__../__J
the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas
with n the public right-of-way. Ail landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and
maintained In healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, · '
and I]'tmming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replace~ within
30 days from the date of damage. . ·
7.. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in __-
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
. . Englneadng Department.
8.speCial landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size bees, meandering / I
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line
9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be ins'tailed Wi~in the public right-of-way on the .__/__/
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
10. Landscaping and Irflgafion shall be designed .to COnserve water through the pri~clplea of -._._/--/
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucem°nga Municipal Code.
Signs
1. · The signs indicated on the submitted plans am conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /._..I
Any signs proposed for this development Shall comply with the S gn Ordinance and shall require
separate appliCation and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs.
H. Environmental
t. ' Mitigati°n measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _._/ /.
implementing sa d measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required fo
· post cash, 'letter of credit, or other forms of guarantae acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount .of $474.00 prior fo the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfecto~y
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by Ihe City to
retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.
Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be
considered grounds for forfeit.. .
I. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Sewice fo determine the appropriate type and location
of mailboxes. Multi-family residential deve opments shall provide a solid overhead st]'ucture for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead Structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of
· building permits.
APPLICANT'SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT~ (909) 477'2710,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: :.
NOTE: ANY REViSiONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDmONAL REVIEW(S)
· J. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: .----/ /-
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan; . .
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size
of servise entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; :
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, Ihcluding Isometrics, undergrOUnd diagrems; water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and . .
g; I~lannlng Department Project Number (DRC2003-01130) dearly identified on the outside of
· Soils report. ~ / /
2. Submit two'sets of structural calculations, energy COnservation calculations, .and a
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. ~ '
3. ' Contractors must shew proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage toI ' / I
' the City prior to permit Issuance,
4, Separate permits are required for fanclng and/or walls, --/' /
5. Business Shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy Issued by the
Build ng and Safety Department.
K. Site Development ''
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and apProved prior to constrUction. All plans shall be I
marked with the project file number (DRC2003-01130). The applicant shall comply with the latest
4
·. Project No. DRC2003-01130
· Comole§on Date.
adopted California Codes, ahd all Other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at
the time of permit application. C~ntact the Building and Safety Department f°r availability °f the
Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. ·
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new'cemmerclal Or indbstrlal development project or ' /'
major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Suchfees may
include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee~ Drainage Fee Transportation
Development Fee, permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program
deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provida.a copy of the school fees receipt to
the Building and.Safety Department prior to permits issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /__
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. · Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __1 /._._
through Saturday, with no construction on SundaY or holidays. ..
5~ Conslmct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public I I
ceuntor). ·
New Structures : '
1. provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for properly line clearances ..~./--/
considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness..
2. provide compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separations. ~/._._/
3; · Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, In accordance w~th CBC .__/..._./
Section 1505.
4. E. xtedor walls shall be COnstructed of the required fire rating In accordance with CBC Talkie 5.-A ._._./.~/
5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5--A. .__./
6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be m~led. ' ' '.__/
Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall beln accordance with California Building Code, City Grading /
Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shell be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
~: A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfomla to '...~/ /
perform such work.
3. A geological roi)od shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geOlogist and submitted at the /.~_/--
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compacfion reports shall be completed, I__1__
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the ssuance of building
5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new C°natnJction projects and for ..__/
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
registered Civil Engineer..
Project No. DRC2003-O
C~mDletion
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 41'7-21'40, FOR'
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. Dedication and'Vehicular Access '
t. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dediCated to the City for all interior public streets i
commun~ treils, public peseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plansand/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilitie~ (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) sha!l be
· reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentatJve map. . '
2. Dedication Shall be made of the following rights-of, waY on the perimeter ~treets (measured from /
street centarline): · .
/
60 total feet on Base Line Road.
3. Easements for public sidewalks and/or s~eet troas placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be I
dedicated to the City.
O. Street Improvements . ..
t. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, peseos, landscaped /' '.~/~
areas, etc.) shown on the plans shall be constmctad to City standards. .
2. purSuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, ho person shall make connections froma SOUrce __/ · /
of energy, fuel or pOWer to any building sen, ice equipment which is regulated by technical codes
and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition toany and all other codes, regulations and
ordinances, all improvements requi['ed by these conditions of development approval have been
completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than'
one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of
those buildings, or units proportionate to the 'completion of improvements as required 'by
·. conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or
Units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all. Improvements required by
these condiitons of approval of development.
3. Construct the following peHmetar street improvements including, but not limited to: /
[' lc..,& I ~.¢. I s,~- I Dr~ I S~,*t I St.~ I Co~,..I M.~=. I' a~. I , I
I°~*' I ~ I ...,k I *""" I"s~' I ~ I ~' I ~""~ I Tr.,, I O~ I
Street
Name
.l~._.~_~UneRo~d |X J X. I C Ix I X I X I I ' I I I
Notes: (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
' reconsthJction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If So marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilJnear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
4. Improvement Plans and Construction:~ . · .
a. Street imprOvement plans, including street trees,'street lights, and interSection safetylights I.~/_
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil. .
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed ~o the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the city
Attomey guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first...
b. prior to any work being performed In public right-of-Way, fees' shall be paid and a /
construction permit shall be obtained f~om the City Engineer's Off'me in addition to any
other permits required.
6
ComPletion Date
C.' · Pavementstrip~ng~m~rking~traffics~gn~ng~streetnamesigning~tra~csignalc~nduit,and !----/
interCOnnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with'any new construction or reconstruction / !
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring, pull boxes shall be placed on both s des Of the street at 3 feet ~utside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
NoteS: .
1) pull boxes shall be No. 6 at Intersections and No. 5 along sb'eets, a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. -
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pul! rope or as specified~
e. Handicapped access ramps Shall be installed on all comers of intem'ecfions per City __1 /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. ' Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all limes With / /.__
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. Acash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grad ng and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
· g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks; Under Sidewalk drains shall be .__/ I
insta ed to City Standards, except for single family.residential lots. .'
h. Street names shall be approved by the city Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / /
5. Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets With connection
through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, F'FTC). The size, placement, and
location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to City
Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval,
whichever comes first... .
6. . Street trees~ a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per C~ Standards In I I
accordance with the City's Street bee program.
/ I
7~ Install street trees per City street tree' design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes Shall.appear on ~e tilie page of the street
improvement plans. Street improvement' plans shall include a line item within the construction
legend stating: 'Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet I typically sheet
1).' Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the
public landscape Improvementplans~ · · .
The City Engineer reserves the fight to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables. For additional information cor!fact the Project Engineer.
Street ~;~,m,; Botanical Name ~ommon Name 3paca . Spacing .., Qty.
ASE LINE ROAD
E/O HAVEN AVENUE
Foreground Tree
~UM ~ / Tda~ulatad .
p.A. Le4~ than 8 fL o~
under power fines Ivlagne~[a omndifiora dCN
~St Mary' / Tdangulatad'
PA 8 fi. or gmab!,'
· / Idinlmum Infon~al,
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
· 1) All street trees are to t~e planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior. to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill coil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All s[reet trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department.
4) Street trees.are to be planted per public Improvement plans only. . . : ,
8. Intersection line of sight designs' shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance'with; I__1
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or.
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted a-~ required.
p, Public MaintenanceAreas'
1. A separate Set of landscape and Irrigation plans Per Engineering Public Works Standards shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of bu ding permits, whichever occurs first ' The following 'la. nd.s. ca.ped .parkway, m. edians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed nto Ina Lanescape Maln[enenee
District: Base Line Road.
2. Public landscape areas am required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or I_._/.
other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. · · '
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting .__./ /.
D stricts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to fir!al map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first.. Formation Costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained' by the /___/.
developer Until accepted by the City.
5. ParkwaY landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective. / /.
Beautification Master Plan ~.
Q. Drainage and Flood control
1. Adequate previsions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entenng the .
property fTom adj .acant areas.
2. A permit from the San Bemardino County FI°od Control District and Southern California Edicon / I
are. is required for work within its right-of-way. -
R. Utilities ,.
1. Provide separate utility services to each I~arcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, I
electric power, telephone, ahd cable TV (all underground)· in' accordance with the Utility
· Standards. Easements shall.be provided as required..
2. The developer shall be responsible.for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. I.
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ..__/ /.
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from
the CVWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been' Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits In the case of all other residential ·
projects. ·
8
.' ~,~mpletion Dat~
4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. ..._./._._/
Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them. ·
General Requirements and Approvals '
1. A nOn-refundable deposit shall be paid to the city, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /
: new streetl ghts for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance If no map is Involved.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall / /._..1
' be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program=. The deposit is fully refundable if
at least 50% of all' wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from
landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to theCity. Form cD-1 shall be submitted to
' the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and
Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Deperlment within 60 days following
the completion Of the constmctfon end/or demolition project.
'PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE D,E. PARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR
IMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. .~/~/
These areas Should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensomd cell. ' ~
2~ Ail buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with ..~/__/
direct lighting to be provided by all enbyways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire
development. .
Security*Hardware :
1. One-inch single cyfinder dead bOlts Shall be installed on all entrance doors, ffwindows are within ~/.__1
40 Inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shal! be used
2. Ail garage or rolling doors' shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. ~/._._/
Security Fencing ' . . ' · . ' · :J
1. i Ail busineSses Or'residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police I .~/.---/
· to the POlice Crime
with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted
Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change In personnel or for any
other reason, the new code must be.supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at
(909) 941~1488. or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 °r
extension 2475. ·
Building NUmbering ' ·
1. Numbers and ~e beckgrounds shell be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
~LicANT sHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION
~.NNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
SEE ATTACHED
RANCHO CUCAMONGA'FIRE DISTRICT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
September 21, 2004. :
Power Storage · ·
Southem California Edison
N/S Baseline Road, E/O Day Creek Boulevard (SCE Corridor)
Public Storage and Exterior RV Parking
DRC2003-01130
' THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT.
FSC-I Public and Private Water Supply
1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing an¢
location of fire hydrants:
a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet.
No portion of the exterior Wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fir~
hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feel
b. · The preferred locations for fire hydrants ara:
i. At the e~trance(s) to a commercial; industrial or residential project from the public
roadways.
il. At intersections.
iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
iv. As required by the Fire 'Safety District to meet operational needs of the Fire District.
v. A minimum of 40 feet from any building. '
c. If any'portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant
measured on an approved route aroiJnd the exterior of the facility or building, additional
private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be
provided.
d, Provide one' fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fra~on thereof.
FSc-2 Fire Flow
1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,000
gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects
a 50 percent reduction for the installation.of an approved automatic fire sprinkler .system in
accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance
with the California Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances.
2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide
the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent
property shal! not be used to provide required fire flow.
3. Fire pmtection"water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to
or onto the site. Building permits will not be Issued until fire protection water plans are
approved.. '
4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of the
proposed project site. ·
FsC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Firs Sprinkler Systems.
1; . prior tO Su'bmitting plans for an overhead automatic fire Sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit
plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping.~
Approval of the underground supply piping system mUst· be obtained prior to ~ubmitting the..
overhead fire sprinkler system plans.
FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15; the 2001 California .Fire Code and/or any other
applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in:
1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet,
2. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access).
3. when required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure..
¢,. when the building access does not meet the requirements of the*2001 California Building Code
and the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lane Standard #9-7
3. When anY applicable code or standard requires the structure tO be sprinklered.
:SC-5 Fire Alarm System
h .The California Building Code' the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the 'California Fire.
Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring.Central Station Fire Alarm. Prior to the installation of
the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services! plan check approval and a building
permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services
in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6.
:SC-6 Fire District Site Access · · .'
:ire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads,
treets drive aisle~ and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access
{oadways Std #9-7.
1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior Wall shall be located within
150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the
building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences ara deemed
obstructions.
2. specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are:
a. The minimum Unobstructed width is 26 feet,
b. The maximum inside tum radius sha!l be 24 feet,
c. The'minimum oUtSide turn radius shall be 50 feet,
d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet.
e. The minimum vertical clearance is ;14 feet, 6 inches.
f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side,
g. The ang e of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent.
h. The maxJmum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed -12 percent.
1, Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW).
j.. Trees and shrubs Planted adjacent to the fire lane ·shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of
14 feet, 6 Inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct. Fire
Department apparatus. ·
3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, aCCessible without the use of a ladder,'shall be provided
as follows: '
a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001
Califomia Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards.
b. in buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in' each 100 lineal feet or
major fraction thereof, of the exterior ·wall that faces the required access roadways. When
railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required
openings,
4. Access Wall(ways: Hardscaped access walkways 'shall'be pro.vided from the fire apparatus
access road to all required building exterior openings.
5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate 'installed across a Fire Depafb3~ent access road shall be
in accordance with Fire District Standard f~-2. The following des gn requirements app~
a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward.
b. All. gates must open at the rate of one Second for each one-foot of required width. ..
c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20 feet.
d. Gates are not required to be motorized. '
3 ·
6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identi~'the fire lanes. A Site Plan
illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be
included in the architectural p!ans submitted to the Building and Safety Department for approval. '
7. Approved Fire DePartment Access: Any approved 'mitigation measures must be clearly noted on
the Site Plan. A copy of the approved 'Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be
reprOduced on the architectural plans submitted to Building and Safety Department for plan review.
FSC-IO Occupancy and Hazard Control permits
Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building
construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field
inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit sha;I be required for any activity or
operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce
conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. ~
· Hazardous Materials
· Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures
· Liquefied Petroleum Gases .
· LPG Fuel Vehicles
e Wood Products/Lumber Yards
F$C-t I Hazardous Materials - Submittal to the County of San Bernard!no
The San Bemardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency .Plan
[or compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bemardino county Fire, Hazardous Materials
Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The county Fire Department is the Cai/EPA
.Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ·
I. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of OccuPancy issued by Building & safety.will not be
finalized until the'San Bemardino County Fire Department reviews your Business
Emergency/contingency Plan. · Califomia Government Code..Section 65850.2 prohibits the City
from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific
· hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP).may also be
required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility.
Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a'plan, is also
required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is
subject to the 'Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with .the
provisions. The tenant must prOvide a copy of the plan to the prOperty owner within five (5) working
'days, if'requested by the owner.
;$C-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire ConStruction Services
'lans shall be submitted and apprOved prior to constrUction Of buildings and/or the installation of
quipment designed to store,, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001
:alifornia Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39
nd other imp emented and/or adopted standards~ '
FSC-13 Alternate Method Application
Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for altamate method, whet
submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distdct "Application for Alternate Method" fora
along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee.
· ChronoloRicaI.SUmmary of RCFPD Standard Conditions
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF.' BUILDING PERMITS W Please complete 'the following prior to the
Issuance of any building permits: .'
1.' Private Water SuPply (Fire)' Systems: The applicant shall submit constructiOn plans,
specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review anc
approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire .District Standards.
Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building;
permit issuance for any structure on the site. PriVate on-site combination domestic and fire suppl)
system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2, and #10-4. The
Building and Safety Department and Fire Construction Serv ces. will perform plan checks and
inspections. :'.
All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable priOr to delivering an~
combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services.will inspect the installation,
witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped.
2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The aPplicant shall submit a plan showing the
locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and
Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a
600-foot radius of the project.. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure
Standard.
All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any
combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and
witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction.Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of
the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction services must grant a clearance before
. lumber is dropped.
3. ' Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in. accordance with all the requirements
of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard f~-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed
· 'at least 14 feet; 6 inches above the finished Surface of the mad.
Fira Flow: A currant fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The appliCant is responsible for
obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter, to Fire Construction
5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: Ail easements and.agreements must be recorded with
the County of San Bemardino.
PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY pOWER
The building construction must be substantiallY completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services'
"Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures."
5
PRioR TO oCcUpANCy OR FINAL INSPECTION - Please complete the following:
1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire
hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance With· the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers.' On private property,
the markers shall be installed at the centertine of the fire access mad, at each hydrant location.
Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance~ a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the'
presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-
site fire hydrants.. The underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for
hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction
Services Verifying the fire flow available. The :fire flow available must meet or exceed the required
fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. .
3.. Firs Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler
system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
4. Firs Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler
monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler
monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion .:
of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of POWer). ·
5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be .inspected,
tested, and accepted by Firs Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment
· is placed in service~ '.
Firs Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall
be installed, inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services.
?. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must
be. inspected, tested, and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards fl9-1 or ~9-2 by Fire
Construction Services.
3. Firs Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of oCCUpancy, the fire access
roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire
· construction Senaces;
The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other apprOved documents shall be recorded and
contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking,, specify the
method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and
the maintenance of all required fire access.readwaysT
t. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerCiaI/industrial and multi-
family .buildings shall.post the address with minimum &-inch 'numbers on contrasting background,
visible from the street and 'electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building
setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non.illuminated 6-inch minimum
number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be
required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in muiti-tenant commercial
and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the .front
and back of all suites. :
0. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance'of a Certificate of Occupancy, the aPplicant must
demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting, the Risk
Management .PIan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the; San Bemardino
County Fire Department, Hazardous' Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division
The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services.
11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancht
Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provide~
contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building c
property...This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector.
12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 ~/~-inch by 11-inch o
11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revism
by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in thl
standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector.
~HE C TY. OF
I
,,~AN Ct~ 0 C~CAMONCA
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning COmmission
FROM: Br~d Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, AIcp~ Principal Planner ' ..
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COnsideration of a
Memorandum of.Understanding for 'the use of Southern Califomia Edison Utility
corridors for recreational trail use and some commercial/industrial uses in selected
· areas as allowed by the General Plan.
BACKGROUND: For several years the City of Ranch0 Cucamonga and Southern California
Edison (SCE) have been engaged, in discussions regarding SCE's desire to develop right of
ways under ownership or judsd'ction of SCE, located within the corporate limits of the City of'
Rancho Cucamonga. in addition, the City has planned for the use of POrtions of the. SCE dght
of ways as community trails, parks, and/or ancillary recreation related uses through the adopted
General Plan. As 'a result, SCE and the City have developed the attached "Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Conceming the Development. of 'Southern California Edison Right of
Ways.' Attached to that document is a Master Plan that depicts SCE'S dght of ways and the
land uses which the City and SCE'desire to develop and use on said right of ways.
A. General: The City has reviewed the proPOsed uses depicted On .the attached Master Plan
and has determined that the proposed uses are, in general, contextually appropriate to the
location where each use is .proposed.
Each of the proposed land Uses depicted on the Master Plan, however, are subject to
review and approval actions including but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone
' changes, conditional use permits, development review permits, parcel maps, and building ·
and fire plan checks, depending upon the nature of the propOSed land use and its location
in the City.
The City and SCE reCOgnize that Should 'the SCE right of ways be developed aCCOrding to
the land use depicted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized
manner, and the projects must be consistent with the Clty"s General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance, and all'other applicable regulations and policies.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2005-00078 '- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON'
April 13, 2005
Page 2
Implementation of the citY's Ma~tsr Plan of Trails as depicted on the Master Plan attached
for reference am, In general, conceptually appropriate for use within the portions of SCE
right of ways where each use is prOposed
implementation, of each City Recreation Facilities 'and/or ancillary uSe(s) shall 'be subject
to SCE's review and-approval of individual License Agreements, Which includes the
operating requirements and limitations of SCE. .
Trails AdvisorY Commiffee: On February 9, 2005; the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed and
recommended approval of the SCE MOU as p .resentad.
Parks and Recreaflbn Commission: February i7, 2005, the Parks and. Recreation Commission
reviewed and recommended approval of lhe SCE MOU as presented.. '
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that, through minute action;' the Plannlhg
Commission recommend that the City Council approve the MOU and Master Plan as presented.
in order.to implement the City General Plan Trails Master Plan.
"
City Planner ·
BB:LH/ma
Attachments: Exhibit 'A" ~'-. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
... ' ' Memorandum ofUnders~nding (".M. OU") . ''
· 'COncerning the Development of Southern Cahfornia Edison Right of Ways within ....
..: the CorPorate Limits and Sphere of Influence of-the -
· ' ' · City of Rancho Cucamonga ·
' The City:of 'Rancho .cucam0nga ("City') and 80uthem California Edison' ('SCE") for several.
· years have been engaged in discussions regarding the desire of SCE to develop Right of Ways
under Ownership or jurisdiction of 8cE located with n the corporate limits of the City of Rancho
Cuca'monga. In addition the City has planned for .the use of portions, of the SCE Right of Ways .
· as community trslls~ parks, and/or ancillary reoreatlon related uses through the adopted General
. Plan. AS'a result SCE and the City have developed the attached "City of Rancho Cucamonga -
SCE MOU - Master Plan' ("Master Plan") of SCE's Right of Ways dated ' .. 2005,': '
andattached hereto as Exhlbl~ A, which depicts SCE's Right of Ways and the land uses which ':
the City and SCE desire'to develop and use on said Right of Ways. ' ' ..
The City has mvlewed the proposed uses depicted on the Master Plan and has dstermined that .
the proposed uses are, In general, .contextually appropriate to the location where each. use la '..
· proposed.
Each of thepmposed land Uses depicted on the M~ster Plan, however, are subjeot to review '
and approval actions including but not limited to, general plan amendments, zone changes,
· conditional use permits, development review permits,' parcel maps, and buildthg and fire plan
che~:ks,.depending uPOn the nature of the proposed land use and:.its:location in the City.
· The city and $cE rec0gnize that should the 8CE Right,of Ways be developed aco°rdlng to the
land use dePi~ted on the Master Plan, the development must occur in an organized fashion, and '
· the project, must be consistent with'the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance~ :and all other
aPPlicable regulations.and polities.
- · .. : '.. - ---. :,-~--,-- iS;uss a"soc~ated with the develoPment of $CE Right:
r conslaenng me communm/p,u,,,,,-u, . ·
.oAfl~ays within the City the .folio~ng understanding and considerations have been determined:.
-1. The Land Uses depicted'on the Master Plan dated ~005. ere, in..
general; contextually appropriat® to the location where each use is proposed. ...
· ' 2. Each development project proposed bY'$cE will be Subject to, and consistent with'the
City's General. Plan, .Development Code,. and all othe~: applicable, regulations end .
3.' ImplementatJ~n of t~e City's Master Plan of Trails as' depicted on the Master Plan dated.
" ' 2005 are, in general;, conceptually appropriate for .use within, the
" :. of Ways wh ra e. ach use la prOposed...- ..
· . 4:' implementation of each Clty'Recreation Facilities :'and/or ancillary. USe(e) shall be
.. subject to 8CE'e'review and approval of individual ucense AgreementS,. which includes
the.operating requ!rements and limitations of SCE. ' .... ' . .. .. .. '
Exhfbft *~A" . I
.Memorandum of U~derstanding . ....
C~ of R~nCho'Cucamonga:" ' ' ' ' ·
Mayor William Alexander ' ., Date
S0uthem CalifOrnia Edison: ' · -
. ~ Manager
Real Estate Revenue DMslon ". ..
Corporate Real Estate Department.· ..
RANCHO eLICAMONGA - $CE MOA,
'RANCFI(~ CUCAMONGA PRoPosED REcREATI0~ SITES
RC- 1- A 'portion of SCE "fee owned'' Right Of Way (Lugo-Serran0 500kV
Transmission Line) located on the west side of East Ave. for use as a graded dLrt lot for
special event' parki.ng up to twelve (12) times pe~ year for'equestrian related events
consisting of car, truck and hOrse trailer parking.
RC - 2. A 2.00 - 3.00 acre portion of SCE "fee Owned" Right of Way located on
east' side of the Day Creek Channel, north of the Wilson Ave. for use as an unpaved
~king lot for trail users) vehicles and poss~ly rest room facilities. It should be noted
that $CE i~ currently evaluating the future of.this property and the possibility of..
dispositio~ "
RC - 3 Trail use for existing 2.50-mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Lugo-
Serrano 500kV Tran-~aission line) consisting of SCE "fee oTM and "easemeat"
Cr k of 2 th St to the City amity.
R_C._4 . Trail use for existing 1.77-mile section of the SCE Right of Way
(Etiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE 'Tee'Owned'' property
north of Summit Ave., east of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly City limit8.
RC- 5 Trail use for existing .90-mile section of SCE Right o£ WaY (Middle
500kV Transmission Line) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property'
Lugo-Mira Loma . ' ."--'ts
northeast of the Day Creek Channel to the northerly city mm .
RC - 6 Trail use for a section of~58 mile of the SCE Right of Way ( Etiwanda-
.Padua 220kV Traw~mission l~.ine) consisting of SCE "fee owned" property south of
Almond St. and adjaceot to Turquoise Aveaue.
RC -~ 7 ' Trail use for a .68 mile section of the SCE Right of Way (Etiwanda-padua
220kV Transmission'Line) consisting of SCE "f~-owned" property nOrth .of Almond .
Aveaue and east and weat of Carnelian Street
RC- '' Trail use for a 3.00 miles of SCE Right 0fWay 01tiwanaa-padua 220kY
· 8 .......... ,~-__ __~.,n,, and "¢asemellt" commen¢illg jllst
Tra~n~mlssion line).conslsung oi a~,t~ l~.,~,~,,~ . Cityllm!ts.
east of Ho'mosa Ave. along the northern City limits and ending at the easterly
· EXHIBIT "Ar
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' SCE MOA '
SCE - CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SlTES
SCE - 1 Power Storage
North Side of Baseline Rd. East of Rochester
8.00 acres (Self Storage).
· Etiwanda 7 Pauda 220kV Transmission Line Right of Way ·
SCE- 2 Guardian StoraRe (Phase I~ .
North Side of An'ow Route, East of Rochaster Ave.
14.50 acres (Recreational Vehicle Storage) ..
West Lugo-Mira Lorna 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE - 3
East side of Etiwanda Ave, South of Arrow.Route . .
1.00 acre (Material Storage & Pariclng)
· West Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right o~Way
SCE-4 ~
North side of 4= Stre~ East ell5 freeway . ' ·
6.00 ac~s (Self Storage)
West I,ugo- Mira Loma 500kV Transmi~°n ~Jne Right of Way
SCE - FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITI~$
SCE-5 Future'Site
South ~de of Arrow Route, west of 15 freeway
3~94 acres (Possible' Uses: Commeroial, Industrial or 'Mixed Use)
West Lugo~ Mira Loma 500kV Transmission Line Right of Way
SCE -'6 Future site
south side Foothill Blvd, west of Day Creek Chn~nel
4.67 acres ('Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrlal or Mixed Use)
West Lugo - Mira Loma $00kV Tran~mi~ion Line Right of Way' · .
SCE ~ 7 Future Site
North side Foothill Blvd., West of Day Creek Channel
"1.00 ~ (POssible Uses: Commercial, Induslrial or Mixed USe)
West Lug°-Mira Loma 500kV Transmission tine Right of Way
SCE - 8 _Future'Site
North side Foothill Blvd. to Baseline'Rd., East 0fDay Creek Cbnnnel
36.00 acr~ (Possible Uses: Commercial, Industrial or ~V~/xed Use)
Efiwanda~Padua 220kV Transmission ~ Jne Right of Way ·"
· 4/5/2005 · ],AGB Z·
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - SeE MOA
SCE -FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITES - (continued)
SCB- 9 Future site
south side Baseline Road, West of Day Cr~k Cbnn~el '
+ 36.00 acres (Possible.Uses: Horticulture,/Agriculture)
~Vest Lugo -Mira Loma $00kV Transmission l.~ne Right of Way
SCE- 10 'Future Site.
North side Baseline Road, West of Day Creek Cbnnnel
+ 20~00 acres (Possible Uses: Horticulture / Agriculture)
V~est Lugo - Mira Loma 500kV Tra~.~nission Line Right of Way
SCB- 1 ! Future Site
South side of Highland Ave., east of Orange Ave.
' + 15.00 acres (Poss~le Use: RV & Boat Storage)
~tiwanda-Padua 220kV Transmission ~.ine Right of Way · ·
' ~ sPECIAL EVENT DIRT PARK]NO
· PROPOSED TRAIL HEAD
ExhibitA1 I "0 · 1 2 Miles "~'a'"~SCETRAILAGREEMENTSEGM~ SCEEASEMENTS
'Rancho Cucamoncla - SCE , I. · I~lEl.~SC~ =FF-~ ~O~N=E~v
Daryl Christian, 3 Jenner Street, Suite 180, Irvine, stated he is the applicant. He noted that this
application for the subdivision is the final step of the wrap up in processing this map. He thanked
staff for their assistance in the process.
Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public headng. He commented that this is considered a routine,
clean-up matter.
Motion: Moved by Stewart seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent), to approve
Tentative Tract Map Subtt16987 as presented by staff by adoption of the Resolution of Approval with
conditions.
AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MAC[AS - carded
B. ENVIRONMENTAL A~SESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.16.030
use regulations to allow public storage facilities, including outdoor RV parking, in the Utility
Corridor District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 and Preliminary
Review DRC2002-00704, Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01130 -
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request for a public storage facility on 5.38 acres in the
Utility Corridor District, along with outdoor RV parking, six storage buildings totaling 71,175
square feet, and a management office of approximately 1,430 square feet to be located on the
north side of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Flood Control Channel within the Edison powe~
line corridor- APN: 1089-031-12. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2003-
01144, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00847, and Preliminary Review DRC2002-00704. Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, gave the staff report noting that the applicant provided a more
recent exhibit for the plant palette since the distribution of the agenda. He reported that the plant
paleffe is essentially the same as shown on page B & C-6 of the agenda packet.
Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Adel Valli, Valli Architectural Group, 81 Columbia, Suite 200, Aliso Viejo, stated he represents the
applicant. He said he is available to answer any questions or concerns and he thanked staff for their
assistance during the review process..
Vice Chairman McNiel asked what he anticipates as a timeline for construction purposes on the
project.
Mr. Valli replied that assuming the Development Code Amendment is approved by City Council, he
would anticipate a 6-week window for the preparation of working drawings and then another 4
months for permits before construction can begin.
Lloyd Dearinure, 12167 Avon Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that consideration should be given
for the homeowners that live adjacent to the Edison Corridor. He reported several concerns about
the proposed project. 1) He believes the City's General Plan calls for agricultural uses in the
corddor. He said he does not want to live next to businesses and to allow businesses there would
Planning Commission Minutes -2-. April 13, 2005
be unfair to the homeowners; 2) He believes his property value will go down as a result of the
project; 3) He believes the project will negatively affect his quality of life in that he lives north of trail
and it will be visually unappealing; 4) He believes allowing RV storage will create traffic concerns,
particularly for access and egress from the project site.
Vice Chairman McNiel noted that the proposal is for the property specifically between Base Line
Road to the railroad tracts and that the project does not affect Victoria Park Lane. He said the
Development Code Amendment may in the future allow additional uses in the other corridors shown
on the map, but it is not part of this project being considered tonight.
Mr. Dearinure continued and said that he had visited existing storage facilities and noted several
other problems; 5) There would be further impacts from security lights from the project; 6) The
project will create a new source of noise; 7) The project will attract a crime element and possibly
meth labs; 8) The project decreases open space enjoyed by the homeowners. He noted that
Southern California Edison advertises on their website the possibility of carwashes being built on
these corridors. He commented that the residents live in the neighborhood, not Southem California
Edison (SCE).
Kathleen Munson, 11996 Sagemont Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, said she agrees with Mr. Dearinure.
She remarked that the rear of her home faces north and she lives between Rochester and Day Creek
Boulevard. She said she researched the corridor property before she purchased her home and
thought the corridors would remain open. She remarked that much of Rancho Cucamonga is
designed after the Irvine area and that it has evolved into a well-planned community. She
commented that there were plans to develop a jogging path and that it did not get developed as
scheduled because of a lack of funds. She expressed concern that once the property is re-zoned,
the use could change. She said she has observed high school students gather in the trail area and
that there is drug and alcohol use along with the illegal running of motorized vehicles in the trail ama.
She said she loves the area and its proximity to her job. She added that she would not consider
buying a home next to a storage facility and that her home value will be affected. She said she
believes the project will attract crime and sometimes families are discovered living in these storage
facilities. She said these facilities often have razor wire along their fencing. She said she received a
citation from the City for having a trashcan in the front of her house and it seemed out of place to
allow this project in comparison. She asked the Commission to be sensitive to the homeowners.
Randall Taylor, 7177 Westhaven Place, Rancho Cucamonga, said he is in law enforcement and his
backyard faces the Utility Corridor. He said he echoes the concems of the previous speakers. He
added that he spent a great deal of time searching for his home before purchasing in terms of a new
neighborhood, a good place to raise his children. He said they had hoped for a new park. He said
he hears stories about storage facilities attracting crime. He commented that he drives I hour and
15 minutes to work everyday, but considers it worth the drive because he feels he is safe.where they
live but if the project were approved, it would not be the same; the project would bring down the
neighborhood.
Mado Avola, 12168 Avon Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he has worked for the Los Angeles
County Sheriff's department for 15 years. He said the community is beautiful and that he loves what
he sees so far but that he does not want to look at dirtyboats and RV's from the back of his property.
He repeated the same concerns mentioned by the previous speakers adding that he would not have
purchased his home had he known this type of development would ever be allowed.
Donald Bomemann, 7137 Westhaven court, Rancho Cucamonga, echoed the previous speakers'
concerns. He commended SCE for notifying the residents about the development proposal. He said
he was not informed by Richland (the developer that built his neighborhood) that any of ~his was
being discussed. He said $CE did not submit any plans for the proposal until after all the escrows
were closed in his housing development. He commented that a storage facility Would become a
dumping ground. He added that he believes there would be a liability issue if 50,000 volts of
Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 13, 2005
electricity were to strike a metal storage building if the power lines came down. He said the City
would gain more tax revenue if it allowed housing on the properly rather than commercial property.
Deborah Dearinure, 12167 Avon Court, Rancho Cucamonga, added that she too searched for her
home before making the purchase. She said the proposed business would be unpleasant to look at.
and would cheapen the vista .provided by Victoria Park Lane. She commented that she understands
the portion near her home is not one of the corridor areas slated for development at this time. She
added that they would not want to have to fight this issue in the future. She noted that she felt the
notice sent out was unclear in presenting the project and the direction/purpose of the notice. She
said her neighbors did not know anything about it.
Maria Segoriano, 7142 Westhaven Place, Rancho Cucamonga, said she has lived here for 3 years
and she loves the schools and would hate to leave but they would consider moving if the storage
facility goes in. She expressed concern about the view from her upstairs windows, the value of her
home, and crime.
Brad Buller, City Planner thanked the residents for their input and clarified that there are 3 distinct
components to the project being presented: 1) the Development code Amendment, 2) the
conditional Use Permit, and 3) the Memorandum of Understanding. He reported that most of the
speakers commented on the corridor space that abuts their homes. He clarified that this specific
conditional Use Permit project does not apply to those areas directly abutting their homes. He said
the site has a flood control channel and utility corridor to the west and an existing fire station to the
east. He remarked that all of the speakers referred to the project as a variance and he clarified that
it is not a variance, but a Development Code Amendment. He remarked that the Utility corridor
already has a list of uses allowed and that the amendment would expand that list to include another
commercial use/public storage. He added that in regard to property value, storage units have in
some cases made excellent buffers between uses, some are better land uses as a transition than
others and some have been welcomed. He noted that as long as the propen'y remains a utility
corridor, the City has very little control over it. He said to allow storage on the property could be a
way of better protection of the property than leaving it as open space. He said that the Commission
has the option to modify the request being presented tonight to include only certain portions of the
corridor for storage depending on how comfortable they are with the proposal. In response to an
earlier comment from a resident, he pointed out that the City actually has fewer homes than the
density allowed by the City's first General Plan. He commented that much mo~e space has been
allotted for parks and open space than originally planned. He commented that to the north of the
proposed self-storage facility is a proposed linear park known as "Rails to Trails." He suggested that
the residents might respond differently to the Conditional Use Permit portion of the project proposal if
the Commission chose to limit the development of certain portions of the corridor that might directly
affect them. Ha gave the public another opportunity to address the Commission with their specific
comments in that regard and asked them if they would still be directly opposed or just opposed in
general.
Randall Taylor returned to the podium and said he would feel the same; the project would bdng noise
and glare. He said the area separating the homes from the project may seem large, but it is not. He
asked if the zone change would include the entire corridor.
Mr. Buller said it includes the areas indicated on the map all the way up to the 210 Freeway. He said
there is also the site specific conditional Use Permit and then the Memorandum of Understanding
that enters into a general agreement with SCE that identifies portions of the utility corridor for trails
and park services.
Mr. Taylor asked if similar facilities could be constructed in the corridor adjacent to his property..
Mr. Buller said they could. He said to limit which corridors could be included is within the Planning
Commission's discretion. He pointed out that many commercial uses are currently allowed in the
Planning commission Minutes -4- April 13, 2005
corridors including uses such as agriculture, hydroponic culture, green houses, livestock grazing and
breeding, on site sales, cemeteries, crematoriums, mausoleums, stables, trails, country dubs, flood
control structures, and elect~cel substations to name some.
Lloyd Dearingure commented that it is possible many people threw out the notice of this meeting
because it was not clear as tO what the notice was about. He felt many more would have come out
in opposition had they understood more about the project.
Commissioner Fletcher remarked that the number of people that came to.the meeting tonight is a
significant representation compared to the number that usually come to the meeting'for a specific
item.
Kathleen Munson added that she still would object to the proposal; she visually enjoys the open
corridor and the development would be an eyesore. She said she favors agriculture or a golf course.
She said that would beautify the area. She reiterated that the project would de-value her home and
it would be discouraging to see that. She said she is waiting for the jogging/bike-path to be
developed and she is concerned about the potential increase of crime.
Donald Bomemann reported that all the homes to the west of the project site are 2-story homes. He
said many homeowners paid premium prices for decks outside of the 2nd floor master bedroom. He
said they were discouraged when $CE removed the trees in the corridor. He said he has some glare
already from the fire station to the east and lights from the project would impact him. He said the
project is about 300 feet away and that is not that far away. He added that it would be unattractive
visually and he is against it.
Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Stewart commented that this is a difficult decision. She noted that the decision
tonight is site specific and that development would only be allowed with the processing of a
conditional Use Permit. She said the Planning Commission has the authority to control what goes
into those noted areas regardless of the zone change. She noted that the zone change does not
specifically mean a storage facility would have to go on that site. She added that the commission
could bring the use back for review if we experience problems with the use. She said that the use
could be modified, revoked and shut down if necessary. She commented that they have spent a lot
of time reviewing storage facilities in Rancho Cucamonga and the code for their development is very
restrictive. She added that this facility would have secudty cameras and a security gate. She said
we do not allow razor wire or metal buildings. She said the buildings are high end architecturally.
She said she believes this would be a compatible use for the utility area and that it already has a
hazardous waste collection facility and a temporary fire station. She commented that the
commission may say '~es" to this one but not necessarily to others in the future; that each one will
be considered individually, uniquely and on their own merit.
Commissioner McPhail stated that this site is not directly behind homes and is buffered by the flood
channel and in the proposed trail to the north. She said that this project has been through the
Design Review Committee and the Committee has required a "high-end" of detail and it would be
architecturally attractive from all sides. She said that in this case, for this site, she believes it would
be a good use, but that each one will be looked at carefully and the impacts they will have on
residents.
commissioner Fletcher commented that they are trying to be sensitive to the residents. He .noted
that the Development code Amendment lends flexibility for the uses that can be used in the corridor
and gives direction to SCE as to what uses would be acceptable. He commented that each
application will have to go through the Design Review process and will have to conform to our strict
standards. He noted that every time a storage facility is proposed, we hear concems about the
increase in noise, traffic and crime. He remarked that we do not see that happening in Rancho
Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 13, 2005
Cucamonga in the facilities we are approving. He said we perform a detailed review of the
surrounding streets and neighborhoods before approving storage facilities. He commented that
there is a storage facility near his office and they are good neighbors; they do not create traffic
issues, there are no loud parties, there are no businesses conducted in the units; there are no meth
labs; no concertina wire. He added that the facility would be allowed under a Conditional Use
Permit, which means if there are problems, the residents can report them to the Planning
Commission and the use can be brought back for review. He said the flexibility of different uses
allowed with the Development Code Amendment would be good.
Vice Chairman McNiel said that they are charged as a Commission is to provide services needed by
the residents of the community. He noted that if you have ever tried to rent storage space in
Rancho, it is likely you will have to go on a waiting list, that there is a shortage of these facilities. He
said that we have very few problems with the facilities that we do have. He stated he does
understand the residents' concerns and appreciates their desire for open space but that we do not
have view rights in Rancho. He added that this project would serve the community at large and he
supports it. He said the project was '~'ell done."
Mr. Bullet asked what the height of the wall is along the flood control channel side of the project.
Mr. Valli confirmed it is 8 feet along the channel and around the perimeter of the facility. He added
that all the security lighting is in "shoebox" housing and the light will shine straight down to minimize
the impact of glare on the adjacent properties. He said the lights mounted on the walls will be at
about a 9-foot height level and those in the parking lot will be about 15 feet high.
Mr. Buller then encouraged the homeowners to view the specific plans of the project. He directed
staff to have site lines available provided by the architect that depict the landscaping and screening
on the west side of the project.
Jim Markman, City Attomey, clarified that the Planning commission will be taking action on the three
specific item~ being considered: 1) the Resolution recommending approval of the Development Code
Amendment; 2) the Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit and 3) the Memorandum of
Understanding. He added that the Conditional Use Permit application is not effective until the City
Council approves the Development Code Amendment. He added that this action (for the conditional
Use Permit) can be appealed and there is a 10-day appeal period. He noted the Code Amendment
and the Memorandum are automatically forwarded to the City Council for final action,
Commissioner Fletcher remarked that development in Rancho Cucamonga is not rampant although it
may be rapid. He explained that everything proposed in these items is allowable in the General Plan.
He said in response to the residents that fear rampant development, that there is concern when
open space is developed. He added that along with tract homes that are topping the one million
dollar-mark come expensive motor homes. He added that we do not allow motor homes to be
parked on the Street and therefore we need to provide facilities for their storage. He said this facility
is upscale in design. He noted that he believes this would be a good solution for the utility corridor.
Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Stewart to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts, to approve the conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01130 (noting the corrected
plant palette), to recommend approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 to be
forwarded to the City Council for final action, and to approve by minute Action the Memorandum of
Understanding and Master Plan as presented.
AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MACIAS - carried
Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 13, 2005
NEW BUSINESS
D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00078 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA/SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding for the use of
Southern California Edison Utility Corridors for recreational trail use and some
commercial/industrial uses in selected areas as allowed by the General Plan.
This item was discussed in conjunction with items B and C.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No additional comments were made' at this time.
_ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by McNiel, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent), to adjoum; The
Planning Commission adjoumed at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: April 27, 2005
Planning Commission Minutes -7- April 13, 2005
Region Manager
An EDISON INTERNATIONAJ Company
June 14, 2005
Larry Henderson
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'729
RE: Environmental Assessment and Development Cede Amendment
DRC2003-01144
Dear Mr. Henderson:
Thank you for your patience on this matter. Southern California Edison has contacted
property owners who attended thePlarmingCommission rne~tingof ~:~,i{ t3, 2005~
We believe that while neighbors may still have some concem, that most of their issues
were addressed.
Southern California Edison and Preferred Investments are requesting that the City
move forward with the Environmen{at Assessmer~ and Deveto~ Cede Amendmen{
DRC2003-01144 and bring this matter to the City Council for their consideration if
required.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
Neil Deny
co: Mike Orduno
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~:~ E. ~,~i, s~-t JUN 16 2005
O~ario, CA 91761
~o9-~o-~5oi 9o9-930-s4o7~)
s~~.~ RECEDED - PLANNING
July 14, 2005 ,!0( i 8 200~
Plaming Depa,ment '- '~ / !¥P'I[N~
City of Rancho Cucmonga
P.O. Box 807
R~cho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: Development Review DRC2005-00078 - City of Rancho Cucamonga / Southern
Califomia Edison
Dear Planning Department:
I have received notice of the proposed building of public storage facilities and outdoor
RV parking in the Edison corridor off of Victoria Park Lane. I wish to express my strong
opposition to such a project. I live in the uppermost north home to the east of the trail that is
being considered to be destroyed. Only a brick wall separates my back yard from this trail.
Building a public storage facility and RV parking lot would be hideous!!
I have several reasons for my opinion. First of all, this "project" would be built smack in
the center of homes. The families su~ounding this site would be subject to increased pollution
from the RYs being moved in and out, not to mention the increased noise and traffic. I already
have had several problems from the Ralphs Shopping Center built directly behind my home, such
as trash thrown into my yard, shopping carts thrown over the fence into yards and increased
security risks from bank robberies. These are things that would be compromised further by
executing on this proposed project. Also, by having property sitting in a lot, the neighborhood is
at risk of thieves jumping into our yards or even burglaries. ! xvould not be surprised, and even
expect crime rates go up.
I am quite surprised that the city would consider such a proposal. This proposal denies
hundreds of families from the enjoyment of their homes. Instead of looking out our windows and
seeing the mountains, we would have public buildings and a huge parkin~ lot stating at our faces.
Many residents have balconies facing this lot. This project would render using these balconies a
trial versus a pleasure. No one wants to sit outside staring at an unseemly sight and breathing
exhaust fumes.
Another issue to consider is the removal of our walking trail. This land is currently used
by hundreds of people as a walking trail. It allows residents to enjoy a xvalk without the
interference of traffic or stop signals. Why would the city consider taking this away from us?
The closest park is almost a mile away and to get to it we have to cross a very busy Day Creek
Blvd. Why should we have to compromise safety and convenience?
This land is also home to wildlife, mainly rabbits and squirrels. As it is, I have a hard
time keeping them out of my yard. I can just image what it will be like if construction begins.
These animals will have nowhere to go but into our property ~vhere they will proceed to eat all
flowers and greenery. I know this from experience. This is exactly what happened when
construction for the Ralphs Shopping Center began. I do not want to go through this headache
again.
I purchased my home as a new home from William Lyons Development. When I
purchased my property I specifically asked about the empty land behind my home. I wanted to
know if anything would ever be built because that was a high decision-making point for me. I
was assured that nothing would ever be built because it was an "Edison easement". I cannot
express how disappointed I am that I was deceived.
I have spoken to several of my neighbors and they too are against such a project. Please
consider our strong opposition to this project when deciding upon its approval. The cons far
outweigh the pros. Also, please note, that I for one will consider a court action against the city if
this project is approved for depriving me and my family fi.om enjoyment of our home. Thank
you for/Iak ,~,,~ny vje~vs into consideration.
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ SCE
MOU - MASTER PLAN
ORDINANCE NO. 7~1~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2003-01144, A REQUEST TO AMEND
SECTION 17.16.030 USE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW PUBLIC
STORAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING OUTDOOR RV PARKING,
IN THE UTILITY CORRIDOR DISTRICT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. .Recitals.
1. On April 13, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public headng with respect to the above referenced Development
Code Amendment DRC2003-01144 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 05-26, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
adopt said Development Code Amendment.
2. On July 20, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on July 20, 2005, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed, amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development
Code; and
e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2003-01144 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects will be
reduced to a less-than-significant level by imposition of mitigation measures on the component
of the project that involves development approval for a public storage use on a specific site and
by the imposition of site specific mitigation measures as applications for self-storage facilities
are approved in the future.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City
Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse
effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 4: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code is hereby amended to
change SECTION 17.16.030, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit A.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sen~tence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated Jrl the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
17.16.030 Use regulations.
Uses listed in Table 17.16.030(A) shall be allowable in one or more of the open space districts as
indicated in the columns beneath each district. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be
a permitted use in that district· Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditional
use subject to the conditional use permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a
given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 use determination
shall be followed. All uses are subject to the development review process as described in Chapter
17.06. The city planner m~y approve accessory uses and structures, and agricultural uses
involving no improvements, under the minor development review process.
Table 17.16.030(A)
USE REGULATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS
District
Use OS FC I UC
1. Single-family dwellings (not to exceed an average density ....... .*~;~ ............. .'2. .........
2. Caretaker quarters:
a. Permanent P P il P
3. Home occupations: il P '- !1 '-
4. Accessory structures (such as detached garages,
carports, cabanas, guest houses, barns, storage sheds,
l
corrals):
.. Agricultura uses:
a. Rowcrops, truck gardens ti. P P JI P
i c Orchards, vineyards, Chnstmas and other tree il P P
farms ~ P
......... .f,: ~¥esto_ck grazlng~ breeding (no feed Iots~) P
g. Hydroponic culture .~L P P .ii P
6. Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, columbariums,
7. Wildlife preserves and sanctuaries: il P .iI~ P i[ p
8. Forest maintenance fac t es/ranger stat on P i P P
a. Parks, picnic areas, playgrounds .II P L P il P
b. Hiking, biking, equestrian trails ii P JI P il P
c. Greenways - P P ~ P
EXHIBIT A (DRC2003-01144) OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
e. Riding schools (equestrian) .il C i[.__,C_~_,~_i[ C
f. Commercial stables i! C ii C ii C
10. Prosecution and use of historic landmarks and related ~
uses such as museums, aA galleries, and food se~ices
to accommodate on-site uses: C C C
11. Flood control structures and facilities: ~1 P ~[ P }[ P
12. L ght vehicle parking and storage in areas substantially
14. Public Storage and Recreational Vehicles'
P = Permi~ed Use
C = Conditional Use Permit required
(Ord. 211 { 6 (paA), 1983)
Not permitted Within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Area.
T H E C I T Y 0 F
L
[~AN C 11 0 C1J CAM 0 N C.A
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
BY: Pamela S. Easter, Deputy City Manager
Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager
S~: CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES
AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL
DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the request of the Etiwanda School District
(the "School District") that the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") enter into two
separate Joint Community Facilities Agreements (each, a "JCFA" and collectively, the
"JCFAs") pertaining to the financing of public infrastructure through the Pinehnrst Public
Facilities Community Facilities District (the "School District CFD"), a community £acilities
district proposed to be formed by the School District pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act o£ 1982 (California Government Code Section 53311 and following) (the
"Act"). Upon completion o£ the City Council's consideration of the School District request, it
is recommended that the City Council take one of the £ollowing actions:
1. Agree to enter into each JCFA and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving such
agreement and making a determination that the JCFAs would be beneficial to the residents o£
the City;
2. Adopt a motion to continue consideration o£ the School District request until the City
Council has considered proposed amendments to the City's Statement o£ Local Goals and
Policies for the Use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Goals and
Policies") to insure that the proposed School District CFD con£orms to the City's Goals and
Policies as revised; or
3. Adopt a motion to decline to enter the JCFAs.
Page 2
July 20, 2005
CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
BACKGROUND:
The following information regarding the proposed JCFAs, the applicable statutory authority,
the proposed facilities to be financed and the proposed special taxes to be levied by the
School District CFD is provided to assist the City Council in its consideration of the School
District request.
The JCFAs.
The School District has requested that the City enter into the following separate JCFAs:
· Joint Community Facilities Agreement by and among the City, the School District
and Richland Tracy, Ltd. ("Richland"); and
· Joint Community Facilities Agreement by and among the City, the School District
and Hill Country, S.A. Ltd. ("Hill Country" and, together with Richland, the
"Developers").
The Developers are the owners of approximately 150 acres (Hill Country owns
approximately 130 acres and Richland owns approximately 20 acres) in the City which the
Developers intend to develop with approximately 358 residential dwelling units. This project
is proposed to be located on the north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and
East Avenue. The Developers have approached the School District and requested that the
School District undertake proceedings to form the School District CFD to finance
infrastructure required for such development including school facilities to be owned and
operated by the School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District ("Chaffey")
and other public improvements to be owned and maintained by the City, the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District ("County Flood") and the Cucamonga Valley Water District
("Water District").
Applicable Statutory Authori~,.
Under the provisions of the Act, the School District may form a community facilities district
to finance facilities to be owned or operated by a public agency other than the School District
only pursuant to a joint community facilities agreement adopted pursuant to the Act.
Government Code Section 53316.2(a). in addition the legislative bodies of both the School
District and any other public agency agreeing to enter into such a joint community facilities
agreement must adopt a resolution declaring that such an agreement would be beneficial to
the residents of that public agency. Government Code Section 53316(b). in the instant case, if
the City Council desires to enter into the JCFAs with the School District, the City must adopt
a resolution in which the City Council declares that the JCFAs will be beneficial to the
Page 3
July 20, 2005
CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
residents of the City. Finally, the School District may not have primary responsibility for
formation of a community facilities district unless that the School District is reasonably
expected to have responsibility for providing facilities to be financed by a larger share of the
proceeds of special taxes and bonds of the community facilities district than any other public
agency entering into a joint community facilities agreement with the School District
pertaining to that community facilities district. Government Code Section 53316.2(e).
It should be noted that under the existing statutory framework, the School District has the
authority to form the School District CFD whether or not the City elects to participate and
approve the proposed JCFAs. Additionally, the School District CFD could finance public
facilities to be owned by other public agencies even if the City elects not to participate and
approve the JCFAs.
Advantages to School Districts to Form Community Facilities Districts.
There is a significant advantage to school districts to agree to form community facilities
district to finance not only school facilities but also other public improvements to be owned
by other public agencies such as the City. School districts are restricted under the state law to
the collection of statutory school fees from developers to mitigate the impact of new
development on the need to provide additional student housing unless the school district can
negotiate a mitigation agreement with developers to provide additional financing for school
facilities. Statutory school fees and state funding for the construction of new schools are not
adequate to finance the full cost of construction of those school facilities. The financing of
public infrastructure required for new development projects through community facilities
districts can provide significant economic advantages to the developers of such projects and
hence an incentive for developers to enter into mitigation agreements. Consequently, school
districts may negotiate mitigation agreements with developers requiring the payment of
amounts over and above the statutory school fees in exchange for the school district agreeing
to form a community facilities district to finance school facilities and public facilities for
other public agencies as well. According to figures provided by the School District as
reflected below, the School District CFD would finance significantly more school facilities
for the School District than the projected $2,675,74l in statutory school fees to which the
School District would otherwise be entitled.
Public Facilities Proposed to be Financed.
In the proposed JCFAs, the School District CFD would be authorized to finance public
facilities for the previously mentioned public agencies in the following approximate dollar
amounts:
Page 4
July 20, 2005
CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Public Agency Amount of Facilities to be
financedO)
School District $12,282,360®
City 9,841,128
Chaffey 1,305,864
Water District 5,902,988
County Flood 1,553,240
Notes:
(1) Source: School District
(2) Includes approximately $5,835,313 in bond proceeds and $6,446,047 representing the
present value of surplus special taxes levied through fiscal year 2040-41 which is projected to
be five (5) years atter the term of the bonds to be issued for the School District CFD.
While the School District will, according to its calculations, be reasonably expected to have
responsibility for providing facilities to be financed by a larger share of the proceeds of
special taxes and bonds of the School District CFD than the City when taking into account
the $6,446,047 present value of surplus special tax revenues, it is clear that the City will be
expected to have responsibility for providing facilities to be financed by a significantly larger
share of the bonds of the School District CFD ($9,841,128 for City facilities and $4,835,313
for School District facilities). It appears from the projections provided by the financial
consultant for the Developers that the special tax will be levied for a period of five (5) years
beyond the term of the bonds to be issued for the School District CFD in order to generate at
least a portion of the surplus special taxes. The City has approved a prior joint community
facilities agreement with the School District in which the City had responsibility for
providing facilities to be financed by a larger share of the bonds of the applicable community
facilities district but the discrepancy was significantly smaller than that proposed in the
present case. The City Council may want to consider whether in the present case there may
be a perception, justified or not, among future tax payers within the School District CFD of
greater participation or responsibility on the part of the City regarding the special taxes levied
within the School District CFD as a result of the value of the City facilities proposed to be
funded from the proceeds of bonds issued by or for the School District CFD.
Proposed School District CFD Special Taxes - Conformance with the Ci~, 's Current
Goals and Policies and Proposed Revisions to the Goals and Policies.
The special taxes proposed to be levied within the School District CFD are proposed to range
as follows:
Page 5
July 20, 2005
CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Dwelling Unit Size Special Taxes/Year
Less than 3300 square feet $4,892
3300-3500 square feet 5,017
3501-4000 square feet 5,693
greater than 4001 square feet 5,792
Source: Development Planning and Financing Group, financial advisors to the Developers
Based upon information provided by or on behalf of the School District, the aggregate tax
burden on such parcels (ad valorem taxes, special taxes, assessments, standby charges) would
range from $11,860 for the smallest units to $12,947 for the largest units. The aggregate tax
burden as a percentage of the projected sales prices of the homes would be approximately
1.94%.
The special taxes as proposed by the School District do comply with the City's current Goals
and Policies. However, the special taxes would not be consistent with certain revisions that
the City Council is considering to the current Goals and Policies.
The current Goals and Policies would permit the aggregate tax burden for properties within a
community facilities district to equal up to 2%. The City Council is considering amendments
to its Goals and Policies which would limit the aggregate tax burden to 1.85%.
The special taxes to be levied within the School District CFD are proposed to be escalated at
2% per year. The current Goals and Policies are silent on the issue of escalation of special
taxes. The City Council is considering amendments to its Goals and Policies which would
prohibit the escalation of special taxes on future community facilities districts to be formed
by the City which would include residential development.
The current Goals and Policies are silent on the question of whether the City would enter into
a joint community facilities agreement with a public agency proposing to form a community
facilities district where such community facilities district would not be consistent with the
City's Goals and Policies. The proposed revisions to the City's Goals and Policies to be
considered by the City Council would include a statement that the City will not enter into a
joint community facilities district unless the applicable community facilities district conforms
to the City's Goals and Policies.
In light of the pendency of the proposed revisions to the Goals and Policies, the City Council
may want to consider whether it should take final action on the request of the School District
until to the City Council may consider such request in light of any revisions to the revised
Goals and Policies. The School District will have the option to continue with the formation of
the School District CFD to finance school facilities and public improvements for the other
public agencies or the School District may delay the formation of the School District CFD
until the City can consider its request.
Page 6
July 20, 2005
CONSIDERATION OF TWO JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (JCFAs) WITH THE
ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Staff will be prepared to answer specific questions which the City Council may have
regarding the proposed JCFAs or the proposed School District CFD.
Deputy City Manager GIS/Special Districts Manager
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~ANCHO CUCAH ON C.A
Staff Report
DATE: July 20, 2005
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: James Harris, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a rapidly growing community with many new streets
and traffic signals. In 1987, the City owned and operated approximately 30 traffic signals.
Today, the City is currently responsible for the maintenance and operation of 152
signalized intersections. In addition, twenty-nine (29) traffic signals are jointly owned with
Caltrans, and the Cities of Ontario, Upland, Fontana and the County of San Bernardino.
The expansion of the City's traffic signal inventory is largely due to the vast growth and
development the City has been experiencing in recent years. Also, the City took over all
signals previously owned and maintained by CalTrans on Foothill Boulevard, 19th Street
and Highland Avenue in May 2003. This acquisition alone counted for the addition of 35
new signals.
CURRENT SIGNAL TIMING PRACTICES
Currently, there are three (3) areas that are time base coordinated to allow for optimum
traffic flows. These areas include Haven Avenue, Amhibald Avenue and the Victoria
Gardens Mall perimeter streets. The remaining traffic signals that are owned and
operated by the City are all equipped with inductive loop detectors or "loops", and utilize
"full traffic actuated" operation. In fully traffic actuated operation, the traffic signal
controller is able to sense the presence of vehicles via the loops. When a vehicle is
sensed by the signal, the signal will change to provide exactly the amount of green time
needed to clear all of the waiting traffic. The length of the green light can vary from 5 to
40 seconds depending on the number of vehicles. This is the most efficient way to
operate an individual intersection because there is no set cycle length and the controller
Page 2
July 20, 2005
Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
is free to serve the traffic demand in every direction on every cycle. The benefit of full
traffic actuated operation is that the delay to vehicles waiting on the side streets is
minimized. The downside of full traffic actuated operation is that there is no
synchronization or "green light band" between traffic signals on major streets.
The method currently being used to coordinate the City's traffic signals is time base
coordination. With time base coordination, time clocks are used to coordinate the traffic
signals. These time clocks are accurate to within 5 to 10 seconds a month. Therefore,
they must be manually reset by technicians every a month in order to keep the signals in
synchronization. In order for signals to be coordinated, all of the signals in the system
"must" operate on the exact same background cycle length. A cycle is the time it takes to
serve traffic in all directions, and to then start over. For example, if northbound and
southbound green are the first phases to be served a green light, then the time it takes to
serve all of the other directions, and to then begin serving green to the northbound and
southbound direction again is the time required for one cycle length. Wide intersections
with protected left turn arrows will typically have a longer minimum cycle length than
intersections with narrow streets and no left turn arrows. Haven Avenue at Foothill
Boulevard is 134 ff wide. A pedestrian is assumed to travel at a maximum speed of 4 ft
per second. Therefore, the minimum pedestrian clearance interval is 34 seconds. The
shortest cycle that the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue can run on is
120 seconds. This means that all of the signals coordinated with Foothill Boulevard,
including the north/south streets must run on a 120 second cycle in order to be
synchronized.~ During a cycle, each vehicle or pedestrian phase can be served only
once. Therefore, if a 120 second cycle is used, the side street will be allowed a "window"
for green time only once every 120 seconds.
In order to coordinate traffic signals without using time clocks, the ability to communicate
directly with each traffic signal must be present. This can be done with cell phones,
radios, or hardwire communication cable. Each method has its pros and cons and they
are explained below.
SIGNAL COORDINATION METHODS
There are four different methods to coordinate signals on an arterial street:
1. Time base coordination: In a time based coordination system, signals are
coordinated using time clocks. A time based coordination system is the cheapest
to install, however, the clocks are only accurate to within a few seconds a month.
Therefore, a time based coordination system is the most labor intensive to
maintain because the time clocks need to be manually re-synchronized. Also,
~ The minimum cycle length is determined by calculating the minimum green time for each vehicle phase or
direction, including the minimum time for a pedestrian to safely cross the street. Wide streets will have long
pedestrian clearance times, therefore, they will have a longer cycle length.
Page 3
July 20, 2005
Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
every time a new signal is added to the system, the coordination timing plans must
be redesigned.
It has been 16 years since the last traffic signal coordination timing plans for
Haven Avenue, Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road were designed. The last
coordination project occurred in 1989, when the City received a grant from the
State of California to coordinate the signals on Haven Avenue, Archibald Avenue
and Base Line Road.
2. Hardwire direct interconnect: This method involves the physical connection of
each signal to a grid of communication cable that interconnects all signals to each
other, much like streetlights are connected to an electrical system. This system is
also linked with a computer network that has the capability of communicating with
each individual signal in order to adjust their timing patterns. This is the most
reliable method of signal interconnection, but the most expensive as it involves the
undertaking of a major capital project including excavation, conduit placement,
pulling cable and pavement resurfacing.
In 2003, the City received grants in the amount of $100,000 from the San Manuel
Indians and $100,000 from State Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) for
the installation of direct hardwire intemonnect for 16 traffic signals on Base Line
Road. This project included the preparation of coordination timing plans and the
installation of an underground conduit with fiber optic communication cable from
Alta Cuesta to Etiwanda Avenue. The total cost of this project was $1,600,000,
and included the installation of extra conduits for the City owned fiber optic
communication system. This system on Base Line Road will form the backbone
communication system to which we will eventually connect all of the City's traffic
signals. The underground conduit and fiber optic communication cable has already
been installed. The tasks remaining include the connection of the fiber optic cable
to the traffic signal controllers and implementation of the coordination timing plans.
This project also includes setting up the City's master controller at City Hall. From
this master controller, a signal technician will be able to observe traffic conditions,
and make adjustments to signal timing from his desk at City Hall. This project
should be completed within the next several months.
3. Radio interconnect: This method involves the linking of an individual signal to a
radio that has the capability of communicating with other radios in order to re-
adjust timing and signal patterns. In a nutshell, a technician operates a two-way
radio that has the capability of calling up individual radios at signal boxes and re-
setting their time clocks so as to ensure all signals are running at the same time
and in the same pattern. This method can be convenient, in that it is easy to
install the radio and begin operation, however, the radios have an approximate 5-
year lifetime and they can be expensive to replace. Currently, there are no signals
utilizing this method.
Page 4
July 20, 2005
Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
4. Telephone/Cellphone interconnect: This method is the exact practice as explained
above in the radio interconnect method, except technicians utilize phones to
communicate with each individual signal. This is also a convenient method in
practice in that it is simple to acquire the phones and install them, however, it is
expensive, as each phone requires monthly payments for service. Currently, there
are no signals utilizing this method.
OPERATIONAL AND INTERAGENCY ISSUES
CaITrans
The traffic signals inherited from Caltrans on Foothill Boulevard, 19th Street, and
Highland Avenue have Type 170 controllers. Type 170 controllers are
interconnected and may be universally controlled by a computer, however, they
run off of a DOS based operating system developed by Caltrans and City staff
does not have access to this software. Added to that, City traffic staff plans to use
Type 90 controllers that were developed more recently. These controllers run off
of the Microsoft Windows operating system and cannot be converted, nor are they
compatible with Type 170. Therefore, the City is in the process of replacing the
old State Type 170 signal controllers on Foothill Boulevard and 19th Street with
new Type 90 controllers. This will allow for the synchronization of signals on
Foothill Boulevard, and on the north/south streets that cross Foothill Boulevard.
These replacement controllers have been included in the FY 2005/06 budget.
The traffic signals at the 1-210 and 1-15 on/off ramps are owned and maintained by
Caltrans. These traffic signals also have Type 170 controllers, and cannot
communicate directly with City owned Type 90 controllers. However, the biggest
problem for coordinating between Caltrans and City owned traffic signals is cycle
length. Caltrans prefers to use a short background cycle length because their
priority is to clear the off-ramps, and to prevent traffic from backing up onto the
freeway mainline. These on/off ramp signals often use a cycle length that is much
shorter than can be utilized by City owned signals2. To date, Caltrans has been
unwilling to increase the cycle length of their signals at the freeway on/off ramps in
order to coordinate with City owned traffic signals. For example: The freeway
on/off ramps on Carnelian Street currently operate at a 70 second cycle. The
shortest cycle the signal at Carnelian and 19th can operate at is 90 seconds. In
order to coordinate these signals, either Caltrans must increase their cycle by 20
seconds, or the City must remove the proteted left turn arrows from the signals at
19th Street. Caltrans has been unwilling in the past to change from their "optimal"
cycle length for the benefit of signal coordination on the crossing artedal Street.
The primary reason that the CalTrans signals can operate on a shorter cycle
length than City owned signals is because Caltrans does not allow pedestrians to
2 cycle length is longer for City signals because City signals are timed to allow for pedestrian crossings.
Pedestrians are assumed to travel at a maximum speed of 4 ft per second.
Page 5
July 20, 2005
Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
cross at freeway on/off ramps, and therefore, they do not have to provide minimum
pedestrian clearance timing.
SANBAG
SANBAG is currently using County CMAQ funds for two signal coordination
projects that will affect the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The first project will
coordinate the signals on 4th Street. This project should be ready to advertise
within the next two months. The next project includes funds for preparing new
signal timing plans for all of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. A consultant
was selected to design this project in 2004, and the project is now near
completion.
RECENT SIGNAL PROJECTS
Ten (10) new traffic signals have been installed around the perimeter of the Victoria
Gardens Mall. These traffic signals am currently coordinated using time clocks and time
based coordination. These signals will eventually be interconnected via a fiber optic
communication cable, and will be capable of monitoring and control from City Hall.
Underground conduit and communication cable has been installed throughout the Terra
Vista area. Signals in the area bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue,
Milliken Avenue or Base Line Road, will all be interconnected to the Base Line Road
interconnection system when it is complete.
The traffic signals on Carnelian Street, from Vivero Street to La Vine/La Grande, have
underground conduit and cable installed and will also be connected to the Base Line
Road intemonnection system shortly after it is completed.
FUTURE SIGNAL PROJECTS
The City has plans to install a new signal on Archibald at San Bernardino Road. This
project will include synchronizing the signals on Archibald Avenue between Foothill
Boulevard and Base Line Road.
Them am many other signals where underground conduit and communication cable has
been installed. These pieces were installed as conditions of approval for new
developments and are waiting to be connected to the City's backbone system.
The primary reason that traffic signals have not been coordinated is due to the fact that
new signals are continually added to the City inventory, and. each time a new signal is
added, a new timing plan must be drawn up. In order to eventually implement timing
coordination and interconnection throughout the City's major throughways, two new staff
members will need to be added to the Transportation Development Section staff. One to
oversee the physical maintenance needs of the signals in the field, and one to monitor
Page 6
July 20, 2005
Report on the Status of Traffic Signal Coordination
the controls from the Master Controller computer. In addition, a new workstation will
need to be built to accommodate the Master Controller, its equipment, and its monitors.
The City's new Transportation Fee Program includes $4,517,000 for the installation of
additional underground conduit and communication cable to interconnect all of the City's
major arterial streets. This amount is intended to cover the costs of design and
construction for the entire underground system.
Not all of the City's traffic signals will be coordinated. When coordinating traffic signals,
the benefit of creating a green band on the arterial street must be weighted against the
delay to the side streets. If the minimum cycle length to operate the intersection of
Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue is 120 seconds, it may not be desirable to operate
every signal in the City on a 120 second cycle if this results in a minimum wait of two
minutes before the side street can get a green light. It may be more efficient to let some
signals operate fully actuated and traffic responsive. Also, it may not be possible to
coordinate some City signals with the freeway on/off ramps without removing left turn
arrows from City signals or convincing Caltrans to increase the cycle length at their
signals.
There are currently seven (7) additional signals that are in-design or are under
construction. All seven will be completed within the next 6 months. In addition, the City
has a list of 56 intersections where it is anticipated that traffic signals will be needed in
the near future. It is expected that the City will own and operate at least 215 signals by
the time the City is fully developed.
Respectfully Submitted,
City Engineer
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
COHHUNITY SERVICES
DA'II~: July 20, 200§
ID: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack I_am, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
~IJI~IECI': CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIl_ COMMUNITY SERVICES
SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS
TO THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Council Community Services Sub-
Committee's recommendation regarding reappointing Tony Mize, Chuck Buquet and
Harvey Cohen to the Community Foundation Board of Directors for four-year terms of office
and to accept the resignation of Michael Arreguin.
BACKGROUND
The terms of office for Community Foundation Board Members Tony Mize, Chuck Buquet
Michael Arreguin and Dr. Harvey Cohen are now due to expire. The City Council
Community Services Sub-Committee met on July 11t' to consider their requests for re-
appointment to the Board of Directors, and a resignation submittal from Member Michael
Arreguin. The Sub-Committee will present their recommendation to the Council at their
July 20th meeting.
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
hic~MMSERvic~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~Sta~Rep~rts[2-~5~c~mrnF~undAppts~72~5~d~c