HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-283 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 06-283
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS
PLANNING RELATED MUNICIPAL SERVICES
A. RECITALS.
1. On September 15, 2004, the City Council adopted their Resolution No. 04-293
establishing a new comprehensive fee schedule for the provision of municipal
services provided by the City's Building and Safety and Planning Departments.
Costs to the City for providing these services have increased since those fees
and charges were last established.
2. California Government Code Section 66014 (subdivision b) allows the City to
establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and
charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the
service to which the fee or charge applies.
3. On September 6, 2006,the City Council gave first reading to their Ordinance No.
768 amending the Development Code requirements for public hearing
notification.
4. Section 753.5,Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations(Assembly Bill 3158
effective January 1, 1991) authorizes the County Clerk to charge a processing
fee payable at the filing of the Notice of Determination (NOD). Currently, the
project applicant gives the City a check, made payable to the County, that the
City sends with the NOD to the County Clerk within 5 days after action on the
project. Oftentimes,the project applicant fails to give the City a check which can
delay or prevent filing a NOD. To simplify the process for both the City and
project applicants, staff recommends including the fee in the Initial Study fee
which would allow the City to pay the NOD processing fee. The County Clerk
currently charges $35 for the processing fee. Staff estimates that this will
increase the City's cost by $18; therefore, the Initial Study fee should be
increased by $53 ($35 + $18).
5. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted a thorough and
comprehensive study to determine actual costs to the City in providing certain
planning services involving a public hearing for which the various fees and
charges set forth herein apply.
6. All data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service for which
the fees and charges set forth herein was made available to the public at least
ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing referred to in Recitals (7),
below.
Resolution No. 06-283
Page 2 of 4
7. On September 6, 2006,the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed
public hearing as required by law concerning the fees and charges proposed to
be adopted by this Resolution.
8. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds
and resolves as follows:
1. All facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based on the staff reports, fee study, data and oral comments presented to this
City Council at the public 'hearing identified in Recitals (7), above, the City
Council hereby finds and determines that the fees and charges set forth in
Exhibit 'A," attached hereto, and incorporated by reference herein, do not
exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee
or charge is levied.
3. Subject to the provisions of Section 4, below, the fees and charges set forth in
Exhibit"A"are hereby approved and adopted as the fees and charges applicable
to the respective services listed therein, and shall take immediate effect, except
as hereinafter provided. In accordance with California Government Code
Section 66017, those fees and charges set forth in Exhibit"A"that constitute "a
fee or charge...upon a development project...which applies to the filing,
accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or
entitlement to use" shall become effective and payable sixty(60) days from the
date of adoption of this Resolution.
4. Each fee and charge set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be adjusted annually
commencing October 1, 2006, and each year thereafter,without further action of
the City Council, in proportion to the percentage change in the Consumer Price
Index, All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles — Anaheim — Riverside
statistical area, during the 12-month period ending on December 31st of the
immediately preceding year. If the Consumer Price Index is discontinued, then
the replacement index in Use and accepted as the industry and business
standard for Southern California, as determined by the City Council, shall be
utilized.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Please see the following page
for formal adoption,certification and signatures
Resolution No. 06-283
Page 3 of 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6'h day of September 2006.
AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
William J. Arder, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adam , MC, City Clerk
1, DEBRA J.ADAMS,CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held
on the 6'h day of September 2006.
Executed this 7`h day of September 2006, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
6", 4&'
Deb4 J. Adam C, City Clerk
Resolution No. 06-283
Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT A
Application Fee
Appeal of Planning Director decision $1,753
Appeal of Planning Commission decision $1,990
Appeal of Tentative Tract/Parcel Ma $1,895
CUP $5,093
CUP — Non-Construction $2,251
Development District Amendment $7,092
Entertainment Permit $4,066
General Plan Amendment $10,200
Initial Study $1,358
Landmark Application $2,880 a
Landmark Alteration $1,746
New Specific Plan/Community Plan $8,929
Street Name Chane $4,673
Tentative Parcel Ma $6,150
Tentative Tract Ma $11,295
Variance $1,854
Variance less than 4 dwelling units per acre $1,857
(a) No fee for residential and small business
Applications
Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum set at three
times the base fee.
Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee
Specific/Community Plan Amendment` $3,140 $300.00 per $9,420
acre
'Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment.