HomeMy WebLinkAbout569 - OrdinancesORDINANCE NO. 569
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING A NEW SECTION 17.02.600 TO
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING
COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON
PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES
(NONCONFORMING USE).
A. RECITALS.
1. On December 11, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion
thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 96-72, recommending that the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
2. On February 19, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject
amendment to the Development Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the subject
amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
guidelines promulgated thereunder pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of
Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3. A new Section 17.02.600 hereby is added to Chapter 17.02
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
17.02.600 - Commercial Parties Prohibited in all Residential Zones
and Property used for Residential Purposes.
Purpose and intent. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council
by the adoption of this section to prohibit parties conducted in a
commercial manner within all residential zones and upon any
property within the City actually utilized for residential purposes not
Ordinance 569
Page 2
withstanding the zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses) in
order to preserve the rights of residents to the quiet enjoyment of
their property.
B. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words and
phrases shall have the meanings set forth herein:
1. "Admission charge" means a tangible benefit, monetary or
otherwise, which is expressly or implicitly required as a condition of
admittance to a party. Customary courtesies and clearly
noncommercial activity such as gifts by guests and voluntary sharing
of expenses for meals shall not be considered to be an "admission
charge." "Admission charge" shall not include donations for political,
community service, charitable, or religious purposes.
2. "Party" means three or more persons meeting together for
social, recreational, or amusement purposes.
Admission Charge Prohibited. No person or group of persons shall
require, implicitly or expressly, any admission charge to any party
conducted in any residential zone or upon any property within the
City actually utilized for residential purposes notwithstanding the
zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses).
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative
enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words
might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by
subsequent legislation.
SECTION 5. Penalties for violation of Ordinance.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any
provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby
adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this
Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty
of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding
six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm,
partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each
and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the
provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person,
firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as
provided in this Ordinance
Ordinance 569
Page 3
SECTION 6. Civil Remedies Available.
The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall
constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means
of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner
provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances.
SECTION 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published within fifteen days after its passage at least once in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1997.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Gutierrez
None
Williams
ATTEST:
William J.
Debra J. Ad~f-ns, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held on the 19th day of February, 1997, and was finally passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of May, 1997.
Executed this 8th day of May, 1997, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adar~, CMC, City Clerk