Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-10-22 - Supplementals5451 Moonstone Avenue SUBTPM20985 Tenta tive Pa rcel Ma p O ctober 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 PROJECT BACKGROUND SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 2 •Jaclyn McDowell on behalf of Mark Reynoso; •A request to subdivide an existing 76,782 - square -foot parcel into two parcels within the Very Low (VL) Residential Zone, Hillside Overlay Zone, and Equestrian Overlay Zone; •5451 Moonstone Avenue APN: 1061-251-32; • •Accepted on March 19th, 2025; •Deemed Complete on July 2nd, 2025. 5451 Moonstone Avenue Property fa cing Ea st on Moonstone Avenue Property fa cing South on Moonstone Avenue Tentative Parcel Map •Proposed subdivision of an existing 76,782 - square -foot parcel that is partially developed with a single -family residence that will be demolished; •Both parcels will be developed with single - family residences with Parcel 1 totaling 54,855 sq ft and Parcel 2 totaling 21,926 sq ft; •The final design package for the residences are currently being reviewed at the staff level. SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 6 PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 7 Development Standard Requirement Proposed Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Area 20,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 54,855 sq ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 21,926 sq ft Compliant Minimum Lot Area (Net Average)22,500 sq ft 38,391 sq ft Compliant Minimum Lot Width 90 ft Parcel 1 – 90 ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 142 ft Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 200 ft Parcel 1 – 319 ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 383 ft Compliant Minimum Frontage (Flag Lot)30 ft Parcel 1 – 30 ft Compliant Minimum Frontage 50 ft Parcel 2 – 93 ft Compliant •Per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions, the project is categorically exempt; •The project scope is for the subdivision of a residentially zoned lot into two separate parcels; •Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the subdivision will have a significant effect on the environment. SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 10 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW •Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet (48 property owners) on October 7th, 2025. The item was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, and the project site was posted with physical notices on October 8th, 2025; •Staff received inquiries and comments from two property owners located south of the subject site. SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 11 NOTICING RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2025 -037 for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20985 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SUBTPM20985 Tentative Parcel Map 13 9817 Base Line Road SUBTPM20935 Tenta tive Pa rcel Ma p O ctober 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 PROJECT BACKGROUND SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 2 •Robert Tobin on behalf of Adrian Buigues; •A request to subdivide an existing 19,252-square -foot parcel into two parcels within the Low (L) Residential Zone; •9817 Base Line Road APN: 1077-011-02; • •Accepted on November 6th, 2024; •Deemed Complete on April 9th, 2025. 9817 Base Line Road Property fa cing South on Ba se Line Roa d (Pa rcel 1) Property fa cing South on Ba se Line Roa d (Pa rcel 2) Property fa cing North on London Avenue Tentative Parcel Map •Proposed subdivision of an existing 19,252 - square -foot parcel that is partially developed with a preschool that will be demolished; •The subdivision will result in two new parcels with Parcel 1 totaling 11,582 sq ft and Parcel 2 totaling 7,501 sq ft; •An application for the development of Parcel 2 has not been submitted at this time. SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 7 PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 8 Development Standard Requirement Proposed Lots Analysis Minimum Lot Area 7,200 sq ft Parcel 1 – 11,582 sq ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 7,501 sq ft Compliant Minimum Lot Area (Net Average)8,000 sq ft Parcel 1 – 11,178 sq ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 7,334 sq ft Compliant Minimum Lot Width 65 ft Parcel 1 – 95 ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 65 ft Compliant Minimum Lot Depth 100 ft Parcel 1 – 118 ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 118 ft Compliant Minimum Frontage 40 ft Parcel 1 – 95 ft Compliant Parcel 2 – 65 ft Compliant SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 11 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW •Per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions, the project is categorically exempt; •The project scope is for the subdivision of a residentially zoned lot into two separate parcels; •Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that the subdivision will have a significant effect on the environment. •Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet (64 property owners) on October 7th, 2025. The item was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, and the project site was posted with physical notices on October 8th, 2025; •Staff received inquiries and comments from two surrounding property owners. SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 12 NOTICING RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2025 -038 for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20935 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SUBTPM20935 Tentative Parcel Map 14 Vinova - Lennar Prima ry Ca se File No. DRC2024 -00395 O ctober 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 PROJECT BACKGROUND DRC2024-00395 2 •Lennar Homes •Design Review, Variance, and Minor Exception for166 single-family homes •Approved Tracts 16072 and 16072 -2, NEC Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue • •Accepted on November 12, 2024; •Deemed Complete on February 4, 2025; •DRC on September 23, 2025. DRC2024-00395 3 PROJECT BACKGROUND (Cont.) •Approved Tracts 16072 and 16072-2, NEC Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue •Final map (2023) and grading permits (2024) issued •Part of larger single -family residential development in tandem with another developer (Toll Brothers) Project Area Property fa cing South on Ba se Line Roa d Property fa cing South on Ba se Line Roa d PROPOSED PROJECT – Housing Product DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE DRC2025-00117 11 ARCHITECTURE Contemporary Coastal “B” Contemporary Prairie “D” DRC2024-00395 15 DEVELOMENT STANDARDS DRC2024-00395 12 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2024-00395 12 VARIANCE DRC2024-00395 18 DRC2024-00395 12 Parks and Amenities •This application has been reviewed and approved by the Building and Safety Department, Engineering Services Department, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District •Relevant conditions of approval have been applied •There is sufficient water availability and Fire Department access during construction DRC2024-00395 20 INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW •City previously certified an Environmental Impact Report in 2004 (SCH 2002091053); •Letter received day before hearing; •Architectural review only. No further CEQA review required as: •There are no new or more severe impacts; •No substantial changes have occurred; •No new important information has been presented as part of this application; •No new mitigations feasible which could be imposed DRC2024-00395 21 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW •Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet (133 property owners) and published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on October 7th, 2025. The project site was also posted with physical notices on October 8th, 2025 •To date, staff has not received any correspondence related to the proposed project DRC2024-00395 22 NOTICING RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 2025 -036 for the approval of the Project subject to the attached Conditions of Approval DRC2024-00395 22 ADU Ordinance Update DRC2025 -00072 Municipa l Code Amendment O ctober 2 2 , 2 0 2 5 BACKGROUND DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 2 •Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance has been in place since 1982; •There have been several Code amendments to remain consistent with State Law in the following years: 1999, 2018, 2020. BACKGROUND DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 3 •To reflect recent changes to State ADU Law, make the construction of ADUs easier, and increase housing opportunities; •Counts towards housing units per Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). ADUS DEVELOPED DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 4 Year Permits Finaled 2020 5 2021 16 2022 31 2023 46 2024 62 2025 44 Data Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Housing Element Annual Progress Report BONUS ADU PROGRAM DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 5 •As part of the City’s Prohousing Designation awarded to the City in April 2024, the City committed to increase allowable density in low-density, single - family residential areas by permitting more than one ADU or JADU on lots zoned for single -family residences in our highest resources areas; •To honor this commitment, we created a bonus ADU program and Section 17.100.050 (Special Allowances) has been added to the Development Code; •For lots over 20,000 square feet, a second ADU or JADU may be constructed if they meet the development standards outlined in Section 17.100.060 for ADUs or Section 17.100.070 for JADUs. SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 6 •Objective standards •Detached garages •Occupancy change •Fire sprinklers •Permitting process •Concurrent permitting •Permitting agency denials •Demolition permits •Zoning and setbacks •Height limitations •Parking standards •Zoning nonconformance and building code violations •Multifamily dwellings •Permitting agency definition •Unpermitted ADUs •Enclosed uses •JADU separate entrance Assembly Bill 2221 (2022) SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 7 AB 1332 (2023) •Owner occupancy •Pre -approved ADU plans •Enforcement authority SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 8 AB 2533, SB 1211 (2024) •Updated government code sections •Unpermitted ADUs and JADUs •Objective standards •Livable space •Uncovered parking •Detached ADUs RESOURCES DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 9 City of Rancho Cucamonga •In lieu of mailed notice, the City placed notice of a one -eighth page in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on October 3rd, 2025; •To date, staff has not received any correspondence related to the code amendment. DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 11 NOTICING NEXT STEPS •The Planning Commission is the recommending body for the subject Development Code Amendment, and the City Council is the designated approving authority; •The City Council must find that the amendment is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; •A noticed public hearing shall be scheduled (date to be determined) for the City Council’s consideration of adopting the draft ordinance. DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 12 RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2025 -035 recommending that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DRC2025-00072 subject to the attached Draft Ordinance. DRC2025-00072 Municipal Code Amendment 14 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC BYLAWS PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 22, 2025 BACKGROUND DRC BYLAWS 2 •Established in 1979 •Resolution No. 79-61 •Ordinance 89 •Municipal Code section 17.04.020 •Boards/Commissions/Committees Staff Liaison Handbook BACKGROUND DRC BYLAWS 3 •Resolution No. 2025-033 o Repeals No. 79-61 o Establishes DRC Bylaws Section 1. Name and Authority Section 2. Operations Section 3. Member and Staff Responsibilities Section 4. Meeting Conduct DRC BYLAWS 4 Proposed Revision to the Draft Bylaws: Commencement and Adjournment Regular and Special Meetings shall begin at 6:00 p.m. and adjourn no later than 9:00 p.m. unless special circumstances dictate otherwise. If item discussions go beyond 9:00 p.m., the meeting may be extended with consent of the DRC members. Absences If a member cannot attend a meeting, they are required to inform the Planning Director. In the event of an absence, the alternate member shall serve on behalf of the absent member. If the alternate member is not available, any member from the Planning Commission can serve as a temporary alternate for that individual meeting. DRC BYLAWS 5 •Planning Commission to approve and adopt Resolution 2025-033 Next Steps •City Council to approve Ordinance that would repeal Ordinance 89 DRC BYLAWS 6 THANK YOU