HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO 2026-094 - Arcardis US Inc.PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 1
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
AGREEMENT FOR
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3rd day of June,
2026, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
(“City”) and Arcadis U.S., Inc., a Delaware Corporation (#2798426) (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the
following design professional services: Design and Construction Support Services for the
Traffic Signal Synchronization for Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III (“the
Project”).
B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services
described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner
set forth and more fully described herein.
D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws
of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a
good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the
mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Consultant’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and
design professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not
limited to design services to upgrade City's communication network, to redesign and
implement traffic signal timing along multiple corridors,, all as more fully set forth in the
Consultant’s proposal, dated March 17, 2026 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached
hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level
of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work
and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between
the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall
control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the
Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2026-094
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 2
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a
revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to
this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten
percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in
writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under
this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for
professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth
in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is
attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into
this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to
undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant
hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing
the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement,
Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant
(a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has
carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the
facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard
of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably
acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or
unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant
shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s
risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year
and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties’
signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not
be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been
fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year
increments to a total of three (3) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section
14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to
pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless
otherwise provided in writing by the City.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 3
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant
shall not exceed $561,172.00 (Five Hundred Sixy One Thousand One Hundred Seventy
Two and Zero Cents), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional
compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state
or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten
percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in
such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for
services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance
with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall
compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the
Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra
services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate
documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in
Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other
records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for
review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Alberto Felix, Traffic Engineer,
or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall
be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of
the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions
that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein,
any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City
Representative.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 4
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement,
Paul Frislie is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant
authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all
decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly
understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant’s
Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of this
Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to
personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible
Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Consultant’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under
Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including,
without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with
the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and
subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social
Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to
be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents
serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability,
damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s
violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City
shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this
Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to
promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.
6.5 Consultant may perform the Services through a combination of its
own employees and employees of its affiliates and that the use of such affiliate labor shall
not be deemed a subcontract for purposes of this Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 5
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files,
drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared,
created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any
and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same
(collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the
benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach
of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without
restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes,
sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under
this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its
representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no
circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings,
reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery,
notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment,
performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of
this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project,
shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of
this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above,
the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its
subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory
copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to
the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights
whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.
City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but
not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding
and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents
that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any
instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists,
including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of
the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full
legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the
role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a
claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual
provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.
Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 6
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or
incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event
City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use
thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to
continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a
license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non-
infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times
remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to
incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of
City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or
employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes
on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold
City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against
City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant
and Consultant’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting,
statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants
that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not
be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant
such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to
City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section
shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to
information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the
Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide
information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably
necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim. However, the
City agree that Consultant may retain one copy of such data or information pursuant to
Consultant’s normal and customary record retention policy, provided that such is kept
confidential in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 7
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. Consultant or its
employees may be required to disclose financial interests that may foreseeably be
materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement pursuant to California
Government Code § 87100 et seq and regulations promulgated by the Fair Political
Practices Commission.
10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained
any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant,
to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person
or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee,
commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of
this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right,
at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or
to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any
such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise,
in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to
the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if
such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable
laws as described in subsection 10.1.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 8
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
11. Indemnification.
11.1 Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, the Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated
volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 11.0), from and
against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of
action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature
whatsoever, including fees of accountants and other professionals, and all costs
associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of defense
(collectively “Claims”), whether actual, alleged or threatened, to the extent arising out of,
pertaining to, or relating to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful
misconduct of the Consultant, and/or its officers, agents, servants, employees,
subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity
or individual for which or whom the Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the
performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design
professional,” as the term is defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c). The
indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance
obligations contained in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required
by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is
charged to Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
11.2 Other Indemnities. With respect to claims and liabilities which do
not arise in connection with the performance of professional services by a “design
professional”, as that term is defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c),
including, but not limited to, those claims and liabilities normally covered by commercial
general and/or automobile liability insurance, and to the maximum extent permitted by
law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and
indemnify the Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses,
liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens,
stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants,
attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and the payment of
all consequential damages (collectively “Damages”), in law or equity, whether actual,
alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of
Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen,
suppliers, or contractors, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or
individual for which or whom Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of
this Agreement, except to the extent the Damages arise from the active or sole negligence
or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or
court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the
Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Damages with counsel
of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’
fees and experts’ costs as they are actually incurred in connection with such defense.
Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs
incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith. The indemnification obligation
herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 9
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Agreement.
. 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that
they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit
with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.
11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under
or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the
termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which
Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to
an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment
against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under
this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives,
employees and subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State
of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the
City, having an extended reporting period of not less than
three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall
provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the
Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 10
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent
insurable.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no
less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $3,000,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or
the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence
limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the
aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $3,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
(5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the
greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by
the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements
shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in
excess of the specified limits and coverage required which
are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City.
No representation is made that the minimum insurance
requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the
obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the
limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required
insurance policy and endorsements.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City,
its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability
arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of
Consultant; products and completed operations of
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 11
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its
officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
City officials which are not also limitations applicable to
the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be
excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except
after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has
been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for
non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty
(30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of
a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall
expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against
City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials.
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company
approved in writing by City, which is licensed to do
business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII
or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating
Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with
reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 12
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required
to be provided.
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting
and/or defending any claim against any insured, including
court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to
and shall not deplete any policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance,
endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any
request for proposals applicable to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this
Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance
coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s),
(2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability
declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements
shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf.
All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before
Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend
beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or
endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the
expiration of any required policies of insurance.
12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors
performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of
this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they
apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its
subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same
extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of
its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub-
subcontractor.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City
relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an
amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to
Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall
pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the
termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant
shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 13
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured
more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the
City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment
Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for
any Additional Services required because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of
delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s
regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other
addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the
provisions of this Section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department
Justine Garcia, Deputy Director
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Consultant: Paul Frislie, Principal
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
320 Commerce Suite 200, Irvine, CA 90602
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the
performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee,
subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer
any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s
obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein,
any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time
Consultant performs the Services. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 14
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the
payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public
works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an
applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage
Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply
with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations
can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm
Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft,
classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested
parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business
and at the Project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected
officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability
arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of
any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a
waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the
making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by
City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of
Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or
prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover
its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material
discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any
document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San
Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement
shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the
party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement
or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 15
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and
integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior
oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be
amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the
parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Consultant Name: Arcadis U.S., Inc.
By: ______________________________
Name: Paul Frislie Date
______________________________
Title: Principal ITS Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name: L. Dennis Michael Date
_________________________________
Title: Mayor
By: ______________________________
Name: Gabriel Murillo Date
______________________________
Title: North America ITS and Connected
Mobility Market Sector Leader
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:________________________________
Name Date
_________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Principal ITS Engineer
6/5/2026 | 10:56 AM PDT
6/5/2026 | 12:11 PM PDT
North America ITS and Conn Market Leader
Mayor/President
6/5/2026 | 1:02 PM PDT
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 16
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, EXHIBIT "A-1"
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”) #25/26-010
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
FOR THE
ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PHASE III
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 29
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................. 5
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 5
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 6
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 6
1.7. BRAND NAMES ......................................................................................................................................... 7
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 7
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 7
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 8
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 8
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE ...................................................................................................................................... 8
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES ................................................................................................................................... 9
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT................................................................................................................................ 10
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 10
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 11
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ........................................................................................................................ 11
3.4. PROJECT APPROACH ................................................................................................................................. 11
3.5. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .............................................................................................................. 12
3.6. PROJECT TEAM ........................................................................................................................................ 12
3.6.1. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 12
3.7. PROJECT SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................. 13
3.8. LINE-ITEM PRICING AND FEE SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 13
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 13
3.9.1. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 13
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 29
3.9.2. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 14
3.9.3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 14
3.9.4. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 14
3.9.5. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 14
3.9.6. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 15
3.9.7. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 15
3.9.8. COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 15
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................... 15
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 15
4.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................................................. 16
4.2.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 16
4.2.2. AGENCY COORDINATION ........................................................................................................................... 16
4.2.3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SIGNAL EVALUATION ................................................................................................. 16
4.2.4. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................................................................... 16
4.2.5. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE .................................................................................................................. 17
4.2.6. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES (PS&E) ............................................................................................. 17
4.2.7. SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS ............................................................................................................................ 17
4.2.8. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 17
4.2.9. CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND INTEGRATION ...................................................................................... 18
4.2.10. PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING ........................................................................................... 18
5. EVALUATION AND VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS .............................................................................................. 18
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 18
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 18
5.3. REFERENCE CHECKS .................................................................................................................................. 19
5.4. PRESENTATIONS / INTERVIEWS................................................................................................................... 19
5.5. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................... 19
5.6. VENDOR SELECTION ................................................................................................................................. 20
5.7. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 20
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” ........ 21
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 29
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” ............................................. 22
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” .................................................................................... 23
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ....................................................................................... 24
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” ............................................................ 25
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ......................................................................................................... 26
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ................................................................................................... 27
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET ...................................................................................................... 28
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 29
1. OVERVIEW
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Vendors (hereinafter “Vendor”) to submit
a proposal response for Request for Proposals (“RFP”) #25/26-010 for Design and Construction Support Services
for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services
indicated herein.
The ATMS Phase III Project will be funded with Local and Federal dollars requiring the Vendor to follow all
pertinent local and Federal laws and regulations for construction phase.
Vendors wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Vendor on Planet Bids through the
City website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement. Only those responses received from
registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Vendor that has downloaded
the RFP. Submitting a response under a vendor name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list
will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration.
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete RFP responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified
in the Schedule of Events below. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be
responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post RFP January 22, 2026
Questions Due February 24, 2026, by 9:00 am
Addendum Issued March 5, 2026
RFP Response Due Date March 17, 2026, by 9:00 am
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Vendor.)
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 29
Vendors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any
part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears no
responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP
and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP.
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This RFP should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Proposal in
accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP
responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the
RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify
your RFP response submittal. Vendors must submit signed RFP responses by the due date and time as specified
herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this RFP and
any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the
requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City
has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement
signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the
due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in
the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the
above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this RFP until a Vendor is awarded, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with
any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site
visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
All materials submitted in response to this RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be
returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Vendor submitting the RFP response. A copy of the
RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Vendor considers
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 29
as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act
may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or otherwise.
1.7. BRAND NAMES
Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not
restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFP responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality
specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFP response clearly describes the article
offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Vendor specifies otherwise, it is understood that
the Vendor is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to
determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand
name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and samples.
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Vendor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to
ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all
requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or
instructions will be at the Vendor’s sole risk.
Vendors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and in
this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide
notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Vendors by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however, it is
the Vendor’s responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFP due
date.
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered into by
the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
· Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure.
· Reject any or all RFPs.
· Reissue a Request for RFPs.
· Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including
deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment,
or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs.
· The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service,
and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 29
· The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with
any or all responsive and responsible Vendors who submit RFP responses.
· Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means.
· Determine that no project will be pursued.
· The City reserves the right to inspect the Vendor’s place of business prior to award or at any time
during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Vendor’s capabilities and
qualifications.
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, public records
are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right
to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall
be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted
by law.
Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this
RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or
omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty
to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public
Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary, or exempt, and state the legal basis
for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information
is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for
the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public
disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal
basis to do so.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Vendor awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no
later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected
Vendor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties
required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout
the term of the Contract.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 29
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES
Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the
provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected Vendor(s)
shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an exemption from
the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code § 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC
§ 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this RFP that such an exemption will apply or that
prevailing wages will not be required for the scope of work covered by this RFP.
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Vendor require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in
this RFP, the awarded Vendor will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right,
title, or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Vendor to assign, transfer,
or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
The awarded Vendor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged
in performing the Services including Vendors subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded
Vendor or under the awarded Vendor’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications,
permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Vendor shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits
and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation,
unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Vendor certifies that it is
aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured
against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of
that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
In case of default by the Vendor, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited
to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and may
deduct from unpaid balance due to the Vendor, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the
City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of
payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Vendors for
delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Vendor.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall be Alberto Felix,
or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall be the Vendor’s
responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 10 of 29
services, and the Vendor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City-to-City Representative. Unless
otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City
Representative.
Vendor Representative:
The response to this RFP shall designate the representative of the Vendor authorized to act in its behalf with
respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Vendor’s
Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the
Vendor’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the Vendor.
Therefore, the Vendor’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement for directing all
activities of Vendor and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful
Vendor may not change the Vendor’s Representative without the prior written approval of City ’s
Representative.
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Vendor personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being
conducted. While on City property, the Vendor’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no
circumstances shall the Vendor’s or Vendor’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City.
Vendor or Vendor’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City.
Vendor's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when
interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Vendor's personnel shall be required to
work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Vendors, and the public. Nothing
contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Vendor the sole right to supply personal or contractual
services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order.
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Submission of a Proposal Response and associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and
evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely, Vendors must comply with the format and submission
requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation
process.
If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with
an RFP review and negotiations.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 11 of 29
RFP responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be
submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFP responses will be accepted. RFP responses must include
the information required by this RFP.
The total maximum page limit (inclusive of all tabs, covers, and Table of Contents; but exclusive of Exhibits A-
H) for this RFP is 80 pages.
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
RFP responses must include a cover letter including the Vendors business name and address of Vendor and the
name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. The cover
letter shall condense and highlight the contents of the Vendor’s RFP response to provide the Evaluation
Committee with a broad understanding of the Vendor’s approach, proposal, experience, and staffing. A
signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be
considered confirmation of the Vendor’s ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This
section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by
sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the RFP response will be separated
by a title page at the beginning of each section.
3.3. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Outline the Vendor’s understanding of the project. This section can include any unique approaches or strengths
you may have related to this project
3.4. PROJECT APPROACH
Describe the Vendor’s proposed approach to the scope of services listed in this RFP. Include a full, detailed task
breakdown that outlines assumptions, exclusions, and deliverables clearly for each task. Vendors may include
modifications or enhancements to the scope of work for the City’s consideration.
A table detailing the full list of anticipated plans shall be included in the project approach. The table should
indicate whether existing traffic signal plans will be referenced, or new traffic signal plans will be created, along
with the sheet count, scale, the party responsible for preparing and reviewing each plan, and the milestones for
submission of each sheet.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 12 of 29
3.5. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
To be considered for this project, the Vendor must have a minimum of five (5) years of experience developing,
fully implementing, and/or performing similar Scope of Work. The Vendor shall demonstrate their qualifications,
experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide an overview of the
Vendor’s qualifications and experience, including.
· The number of years in business, main business focus, locations that will primarily support the project.
· If the firm is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed solution
or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services.
· A statement as to whether your firm is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or private
nonprofit firm, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
· Five projects with a similar scope of work completed within the last five years. Must include the project
scope of work, Vendor’s team members that worked on the project, and timeline of the project delivery.
The Vendor shall provide additional information as necessary for the City to consider in the evaluation of the
submitted proposal.
3.6. PROJECT TEAM
This section should introduce the key staff that the firm commits to the project. A proposed Organization Chart
shall be included. Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the city.
Resumes shall include the following information:
· Project Role,
· Length of time with the Company,
· Years of Experience,
· Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described
herein,
· Educational background,
· Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein,
· Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
3.6.1. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Vendor intends to subcontract any portion of the work, a detailed list of any subcontractors, partners, or
third-party Vendors who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services should be included in
this section. Information provided on subcontractors Vendors shall include:
· Description of subcontractor’s role in the project.
· Description of the Vendor’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors,
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13 of 29
· Resumes with the same format as specified above for the key team members of the subcontracting
team,
3.7. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Prepare a detailed project schedule including estimated review for the appropriate agencies. The City will be
looking for a realistic, well- conceived schedule. The contract documents and permits should be ready to
advertise for construction bids within 18 months from NTP.
3.8. LINE-ITEM PRICING AND FEE SCHEDULE
Line-item pricing for this RFP must be provided directly in the Planet Bids system under the “Line Items” tab.
The line-item pricing shall be shown as one lump sum item for the total cost of the professional services as
described above.
A PDF of the detailed fee schedule shall be submitted separately on the planet bids portal. The total price on
the fee table shall match the total lump sum value included under the line-item pricing on Planet Bids. The fee
shall correspond to the task list as outlined in the Vendor ’s proposed scope of work and shall include a detailed
estimate of hours, billing rates per classification, direct costs and any subconsultant costs. The hourly rates shall
be set for the base term of the contract effective until the end of 2028.
While Line-item pricing accompanies your RFP response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP
response other than the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. No references to cost shall be included in the technical
proposal. The City will not be obligated to any estimated pricing or pricing not identified in the “Line Item” tab
in Planet Bids. Failure to provide the required Line-Item pricing in the required format will cause Vendor’s RFP
response to be considered as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process.
Any questions or clarifications regarding how to correctly submit Line-Item pricing and fee schedule should be
submitted by the “Questions Due” date and time indicated in the schedule of events.
3.9. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet
Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G and Exhibit H. Failure to comply with this instruction
will deem your RFP submittal as non-responsive.
3.9.1. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed
“Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the
Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14 of 29
3.9.2. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Vendor will be required to enter
into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City ’s bid
system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Vendor and signed by
both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general provisions
which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Vendor will be deemed to have
agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services Agreement Exceptions
Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the PSA language in writing.
Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to
any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G”.
3.9.3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Vendors must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to
comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of Insurance
Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The awarded Vendor
will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the
Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Vendor, will not be
accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types,
Exhibits A – G.
3.9.4. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Vendor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Vendor’s
responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been
posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become
part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. Vendors must indicate their acknowledgement of
any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted
under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
3.9.5. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Bidding Vendors must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Vendor Certification Form” that they are not
listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the
guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689
(3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax
delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response
Types, Exhibits A – H.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 15 of 29
3.9.6. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Vendors shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet Bid
Response Types, Exhibits A – G. This will indicate a Vendors agreement to or not to allow other entities to utilize
the RFP response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
3.9.7. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Unsigned RFP responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Vendor has carefully
examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and hereby
proposes and agrees, if the Vendors RFP response is accepted, Vendor agrees to furnish all material in
accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit cost amounts
set forth in the Vendors RFP response.
3.9.8. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are
being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years.
“Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the
“Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your RFP
response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit
H” in Planet Bids.
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is continuing its citywide effort to enhance regional mobility, reduce congestion,
and improve multimodal travel through advanced traffic signal coordination and communication
infrastructure. Following the successful completion of ATMS Phase I (Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard)
and ongoing construction under ATMS Phase II (Milliken Avenue, 19th Street, Arrow Route, Rochester Avenue,
and Day Creek Boulevard), the city is initiating ATMS Phase III.
This phase will implement signal synchronization, signal interconnect design and traffic infrastructure
improvements along:
· Archibald Avenue (between 8th Street and Banyan Street) including fourteen (14) signalized
intersections including the freeway on-ramps and off-ramps at Archibald Ave and SR-210
· Base Line Road (between Alta Cuesta Drive and East Avenue) includes twenty-seven (27) signalized
intersections.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 16 of 29
· Freeway on-ramps and off-ramps at Milliken Avenue and SR-210 and Day Creek Blvd and SR-210.
4.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.2.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Coordinate and lead project kick-off meeting.
Prepare and maintain current project schedule with all the deliverables and timelines
including any required agency permits or reviews.
Vendor to identify progress meetings as needed but no less frequent than monthly to provide
updates, obtain any new information, and discuss design and implementation issues that
arise during the project.
4.2.2. AGENCY COORDINATION
Coordination with utility agencies, Caltrans, San Bernardino County Flood Control District
(SBFCD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USAEC) and neighboring jurisdictions (e.g. City of
Upland) if applicable.
Obtain all necessary permits and right-of-way clearances.
4.2.3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SIGNAL EVALUATION
Collect ADTs, intersection turning movement counts and pedestrian data at AM Peak, PM
Peak and mid-day.
Develop corridor-wide traffic models using Synchro to optimize the proposed signal timing.
Prepare summary report with recommended traffic signal timing modifications based on the
results of Synchro analysis for City review and concurrence. Summary report shall include
phase timing, controller options, preemption/transition charts for splits, offsets and cycle
lengths through the corridor in accordance with City standard practice and industry best
practices.
4.2.4. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS
Identify and gather all existing as-built drawings and documentation.
Develop an initial inventory of the relevant information including but not limited to the
cabinets, existing pull boxes, and all existing conduits and field verify each location. Any
information that is not available is assumed to be the responsibility of the Vendor to field
verify to ensure accuracy.
Coordinate and obtain existing as-builts from all the utility companies and show on the
project plans. Coordinate any potential conflicts or relocations with utility companies.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 17 of 29
4.2.5. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Prepare the Project Environmental document. Consultant to recommend the appropriate
level of environmental document and any necessary technical studies.
The environmental scope shall also include obtaining all required environmental permits,
including but not limited to a Section 408 Permit for work associated with the Deer Creek and
Cucamonga Creek crossings at Base Line Road, or any other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
jurisdictional channels impacted by this project.
4.2.6. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES (PS&E)
Submit 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%, and final construction plans. Plans shall be submitted in
both AutoCAD and PDF formats using City CAD standards.
o Prepare fiber optic interconnect plans for all locations including any new pull boxes
and existing utilities in accordance with City and Caltrans Standards. Plans shall
include but not be limited to existing roadway features such as curbs, gutters, and
driveways, pull boxes, service cabinets, signal poles, and signal cabinets that might
interfere with the installation of the subject improvements.
o Prepare plans for all locations showing fiber optic splice charts for the cabinet and
connection to the hub.
o Prepare signal modification plans for up to sixteen (16) locations showing controller
upgrades, cabinet upgrades, UPS, CCTV and video detection systems.
Prepare corresponding construction cost estimates for the 30%, 60%, 90% and 100%
milestones.
Prepare draft and final specifications per Caltrans and City standards starting at the 90%
submittal.
4.2.7. SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS
Develop new time-of-day timing sheets for weekday peak, weekday off-peak, and weekends
conditions for all locations. Timing sheets shall be submitted in the Cobalt controller format, in
both electronic and hardcopy form for use during cabinet installation.
Include up to two rounds of revisions and City comment on the timing sheets.
4.2.8. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Provide technical assistance during construction bidding including responding to RFIs, RFCs
and preparing addenda as necessary.
Construction support services including attendance at the pre-construction meeting,
submittal reviews, and response to RFIs and RFCs.
Prepare as-builts, based upon redline plans provided by the contractor.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18 of 29
4.2.9. CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND INTEGRATION
Implement new proposed timing into City’s central management system for all intersections
including creating intersection nodes for Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue signals; not
limited to signal timing, phasing configuration, and IP addresses.
4.2.10. PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING
Conduct after studies monthly for up to one (1) year after construction is complete.
Studies shall build on task 4.2.3 to evaluate operational improvements and prepare a
summary report with visuals demonstrating the travel time improvements. Report shall
document any recommended timing adjustments and the benefits including time savings to
the motoring public and environmental benefits (i.e., GHG reductions) of the signal timing
improvements.
5. EVALUATION AND VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those
RFP responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the RFP requirement as indicated herein will
proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by
an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10),
ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will
be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Project Understanding 25
Project Approach 25
Project Team Experience 30
Company Expertise 20
Evaluators do not see the Vendor References or line items pricing
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 19 of 29
5.3. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and the requesting
department may or may not be present during the process. The reference checks may be conducted by phone
with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Vendor ’s reference
contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score
from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with
the criteria scores. It is imperative that Vendors provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact
information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Vendor ranking.
5.4. PRESENTATIONS / INTERVIEWS
Upon completion of the RFP evaluations, if necessary, selected top ranked Vendors will be provided an
opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to further expand on their RFP response.
Vendor interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of zero (0) through ten (10), ten being the
highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as stated within the RFP.
Interviews will be conducted in person at City Hall. All Vendors shall be available to interview in person if they
are selected for the short list and if staff determine interviews are necessary. Short listed firms will be notified
a minimum of ten days in advance of the interview.
5.5. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
Vendors that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its firm’s
financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department. Should a
Vendor wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon completion of the
review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation will be required of
each Vendor on the short-list:
· A copy of the Vendor’s most recent annual report.
· Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years.
· If audited data is not available, Vendor shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the past
three (3) years.
· Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by
the Vendor.
· Indicate all applicable information regarding Vendor ownership changes in the last three (3)
years.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 20 of 29
5.6. VENDOR SELECTION
The final Vendor selection is based on which Vendor is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s requirements,
offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the lowest price
proposal.
The City may also negotiate contract terms with the selected Vendors prior to award. The City, at its sole
discretion, reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part
thereof, either separately or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined
to be in the best interest of the City.
5.7. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Vendor selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all
participating, responsive Vendors. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing
Vendors unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may
negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Vendor or withdraw the RFP entirely.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 29
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT”
It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such
conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for
Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Vendors.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to
the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010 for Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced
Traffic Management System Phase III.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any
RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not
limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP
response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and
agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Vendors)
_______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 29
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”
Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Vendors accept the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Vendors propose exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as
“Exception Summary”, which shall include the Vendors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each
exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the
submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 29
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________
(President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative)
of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the
(Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010 for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III have been
read and understood and that our Vendors is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA.
Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for
immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the
contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 29
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Vendors hereby acknowledge the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Vendors understand failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered
non-responsive. It is the Vendors’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number
of addenda that have been posted.
· __________________
· __________________
· __________________
· __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 29
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”
I certify that neither _____________________________ (Vendor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are
not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in
accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986
Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed
subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Vendors or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or
debarment by a local, state, or federal government entity, or if Vendors or any of its subcontractors
subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26 of 29
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may
utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of
_______ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner
or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of
such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of
its own order placement and payments of the Vendors.
Successful Vendors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please
specify.
YES, _________ NO, _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 27 of 29
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and
conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO
MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name:
Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address:
Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print)
Title:
Signature:
Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28 of 29
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 29
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All Exhibit H, References Worksheet must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits H.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Questions
Please confirm which forms (if any) need to be
completed by any subcontractors, partners, or
third-party Vendors who will be involved in the
implementation of the proposed services.
Archibald Ave/210 on and off ramps involve
any physical modifications to the ramp termini
points? If so what type of modifications are
proposed? If no physical modifications are
proposed or if they are limited to negligible
disturbances, please confirm.
proposed at the SR-210 ramps at Milliken Ave
and Dry Creek Blvd?
within existing publicly owned right-of-way?
Any need for TCE’s outside of those right-of-
way limits anticipated?
Addendum No. 001
right-of-way. However, the project limits extend
into areas under the jurisdiction of other public
agencies. Therefore, the Vendor shall be
responsible for obtaining all necessary permits
and right-of-way clearances from the respective
agencies, including Caltrans, the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District (SBFCD), and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Request for Proposal RFP #25/26-010 Design and Construction Support Services for the
The prime vendor is required to complete and
submit Forms A through H. No sub-vendor will
be required to fill out any of these forms.
along Archibald Avenue/SR-210 is not required.
The scope of work is anticipated to include, but
is not limited to, signal interconnect
enhancements, system synchronization, and
targeted signal equipment upgrades.
intersections at Milliken Avenue and Day Creek
Boulevard consists of designing a connection
from the City’s existing fiber network to the
Caltrans traffic signal cabinet, including but not
limited to pullbox upgrades and conduit
replacement.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Are there any secondary utilities relocations
required? If so, has prior rights been
established and the location of the relocated
utilities been identified?
acceptable.
can we include more than five projects?
location?
project?
Can the city provide the as-built design
plans including the fiber breakout details
from ATMS Phase II?
At this time, no utility relocations are
anticipated under the RFP. However, if any
utility conflicts are discovered during the course
of the project, the Vendor shall be responsible
for providing solutions to resolve such conflicts.
RFP. However, their use should be limited to the
presentation of graphs, images, diagrams, or
conceptual exhibits rather than narrative text.
via Planet Bids.
Communication is restricted to:
Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician
City of Rancho Cucamonga
No paper submissions are accepted.
provision. All proposals will be evaluated based
on the listed criteria in the RFP.
listed criteria in the RFP. Points will not be
allocated per locations.
for design.
construction is completed.
of work completed within the last five years.
Proposals will be evaluated on a proposal basis,
with emphasis on overall qualifications and
approach. Cost will only be evaluated in the
event that the proposed fee exceeds the City’s
estimated budget.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 17
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
CONSULTANT PROPOSAL, EXHIBIT "A-2"
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Design and Construction
Support Services for
the Advanced Traffic
Management System Phase III
Submitted to
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
March 17, 2026
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
1. Cover Letter / Introduction
March 17, 2026
ATTN: Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: RFP #25/26-010 - Design and Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Dear Ms. Combs and Members of the Evaluation Committee:
Arcadis U.S., Inc. is pleased to submit our proposal to provide design and construction support services for the
Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Phase III Project. The City’s continued investment in intelligent
transportation systems (ITS) and communications infrastructure reflects a strong commitment to improving corridor
operations, safety, and mobility. ATMS Phase III builds on that momentum by extending system upgrades and optimized
operations along Archibald Avenue, Base Line Road, and key SR-210 interchange locations.
Arcadis is a national leader in Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO), ITS, traffic engineering,
and signal communications design. Our team brings deep experience delivering corridor signal synchronization, fiber
interconnect, central system integration, and performance monitoring programs for California municipalities and
regional agencies. We understand the technical, operational, and coordination challenges associated with implementing
signal interconnect systems and timing optimization across complex, high-volume corridors and freeway interchange
environments.
Our proposal is organized around three differentiators: People, Process, and Projects, to ensure this program is
delivered efficiently, transparently, and with a clear focus on operational results.
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
18401 Von Karman Ave, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
www.arcadis.com
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III 2
People: Experienced Leadership and Local Knowledge
ATMS design success depends on the people delivering it. Arcadis proposes a dedicated team with direct experience in
southern California corridor operations, signal systems, and multi-agency coordination. Several of the team members
delivered Phase I of this initial project.
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III, will serve as Project Manager and will be the City’s primary point of contact, leading the effort
from kickoff through construction support. He is supported by a multidisciplinary Arcadis team and key partners selected
for their alignment with the City’s systems and needs:
• LLG, providing hands‑on familiarity with the City’s network infrastructure, fiber systems, and monitoring platforms
• Dudek, leading CEQA and NEPA compliance with proven Caltrans Local Assistance experience
• AimTD, supporting traffic data collection to inform corridor modeling and timing optimization
This team structure minimizes transition risk, preserves institutional knowledge, and ensures accountability throughout
delivery.
Process: A Disciplined, Transparent Delivery Model
Arcadis’ approach emphasizes predictability, quality, and City visibility. We begin with a structured kickoff to confirm
scope, schedule, communication protocols, and decision-making pathways. Progress is managed through disciplined
internal controls, regular coordination, and documented actions.
Quality is embedded throughout the process via task‑level reviews, Project Manager oversight, and senior peer review
when appropriate. Schedule and budget are actively managed using detailed work planning and internal tracking tools.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
To enhance transparency, Arcadis will provide a Project Management Dashboard integrating schedule progress,
submittals, approvals, procurement status, and short‑ and long‑term risk tracking, giving the City real‑time insight into
project health and emerging issues.
As an added value, Arcadis will provide the City with direct access to our inSIGHT AM Asset Management Platform to
create and maintain a comprehensive digital inventory of ITS and communications infrastructure for both corridors. This
intuitive platform streamlines asset tracking, lifecycle management, and maintenance planning by consolidating data
from current and previous corridor projects. By offering real‑time visibility and easy‑to‑use tools, inSIGHT AM empowers
City staff to efficiently manage assets throughout the project lifecycle, ensuring thorough documentation, improved
operational control, and enhanced long‑term decision‑making.
3The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
1. Cover Letter / Introduction
Projects: End-to-End Delivery Focused on Results
ATMS Phase III is an operational improvement program, not just a design effort. Arcadis supports the full lifecycle:
from existing conditions evaluation and corridor signal optimization, through PS&E development and permitting, to
construction support and system integration.
We advance optimized signal timing informed by corridor conditions such as school-related surges, geometric
constraints, and freeway ramp interactions. PS&E documents are delivered through 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%
submittals in accordance with City, Caltrans, and CA MUTCD standards. During construction, Arcadis remains actively
engaged to preserve design intent, minimize changes, and deliver accurate as-built documentation. Following
implementation, we support central system integration and performance monitoring to quantify improvements and guide
future refinements.
Commitment
Arcadis understands Rancho Cucamonga is seeking a partner who can deliver ATMS Phase III reliably while maximizing
the return on the City’s transportation technology investments. Our proposal reflects that commitment, supported by the
right people, a proven process, and relevant project experience.
We appreciate the opportunity to support the City and look forward to continuing the conversation.
Sincerely,
Ramin Massoumi, PE | Interim Global President, Mobility | Arcadis U.S., Inc.
18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612
Tel. 562.221.2118 | Fax. N/A | ramin.massoumi@arcadis.com
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
2. Contents
1.Cover Letter / Introduction.............2
2.Table of Contents.............................4
3.Project Understanding....................6
4.Project Approach..............................13
5.Qualifications and Experience.......22
6.Project Team.....................................27
7.Project Schedule...............................42
Submitted Separately:
8.Line-Item Pricing & Fee Schedule
9.Exhibits A through H
4
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
3
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
6
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Rancho Cucamonga’s Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Phase 3 project brings upgrades to two major
corridors within the City, Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. The corridors will receive upgrades for video detection
system, CCTV cameras, fiber optic communications, traffic signal controllers and cabinets, and signal timing. The Base
Line Road corridor consists of twenty-seven signals and Archibald consists of fourteen signals. Both corridors will
require coordination with Caltrans District 8 for work within the ramps at the I‑15 and I‑210 freeways. The primary goal
of this project is to deploy new ITS communication infrastructure to support the management of Rancho Cucamonga’s
transportation network and implement optimized coordination timing plans to achieve optimal traffic flow. Having the
latest technology in-place will enable agencies to improve safety and signal operations, while reducing traffic impacts
within the local community.
Signal Equipment Observations
The Arcadis team conducted comprehensive preliminary field investigations, which did not include opening any traffic
signal cabinets or pull boxes, alongside a thorough review of the City’s ITS Master Plan. Leveraging valuable insights and
technical expertise gained from the Phase 1 project, such as the use of IT conduit and manholes for fiber installations,
the strategic placement of field hubs, and the successful integration of the main backbone ring, this integrated approach
enabled the team to accurately identify the specific needs and requirements at each project intersection. These efforts
laid the foundation for a tailored preliminary design scope of work. The results of the field and master plan reviews
are summarized in the table on Page 10 and depicted in the project map on Page 11, providing clear visualization and
documentation of key findings. This scope will be further refined through collaborative meetings with City stakeholders
and more detailed fieldwork to ensure alignment with evolving project objectives and on‑the ‑ground conditions.
Corridor Operations
The Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue corridors both exhibit recurring operational challenges driven primarily
by school‑related surges, misaligned coordination between adjacent signals, constrained roadway geometry, and
downstream capacity limitations. Across both corridors, school start times significantly shape the AM peak, producing
heavy, localized queues that disrupt progression and propagate upstream. Several intersections also experience
efficiency losses due to lane drops or uncoordinated freeway ramp signals, each contributing to unpredictable stops and
broken platoons. Together, these factors illustrate how closely corridor performance is tied to the interaction between
land use (particularly schools), traffic signal timing, and physical constraints.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
3. Project UnderstandingDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
7
Along Base Line Road, westbound operations are heavily influenced by school traffic and downstream bottlenecks.
At Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, westbound queues routinely extend back through numerous cycles due
to heavy demand generated by Grapeland Elementary School and the immediate drop from three to two westbound
lanes downstream of the intersection. From Milliken Avenue to Haven Avenue illustrates room for improvement for
progression. The main westbound platoon departs Milliken Avenue but is repeatedly interrupted, first by a short stop
at Spruce Avenue, which causes half the platoon to be held and thus arrive late to Valencia Avenue. At Haven Avenue,
westbound vehicles experience a long stop, serving higher cross-street demand, while another downstream lane drop
again reduces throughput capacity. Between Carnelian Street and Vineyard Avenue, operations are further influenced by
Alta Loma High School, with recurring congestion visible near 8:30 AM.
The Archibald Avenue corridor faces its own operational
constraints, particularly near the I 210 interchange and
along school-heavy segments around Foothill Boulevard.
Between Highland Avenue and the westbound I 210
ramp (shown in the picture to the right), vehicles often
become trapped within very limited storage space due to
insufficient coordination between City-operated signals
and Caltrans ramp signals; improved synchronization,
potentially via GPS clocks and updated coordination plans,
would help reduce these recurring blockages. Further
south, Central Elementary School traffic significantly
impacts operations between San Bernardino Road and
Foothill Boulevard. Southbound vehicles often stop at San
Bernardino Road and then fail to reach Foothill during
the next green, indicating a misalignment of offsets even though Foothill itself clears its stored queue during service.
Further south, between 8th Street and Arrow Highway, Cucamonga Elementary School traffic creates additional morning
congestion, with queue spillback that can affect upstream intersection performance.
Overall, both Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue demonstrate how corridor flow can be impacted by school-generated
surges, constrained geometry, and partial signal coordination. These observations highlight opportunities for refining
offsets, balancing splits, coordinating with external agencies, and adjusting timing plans to better accommodate
predictable school patterns and known physical bottlenecks.
Traffic Signal Network Understanding
Our subcontractor, LLG, brings valuable local expertise to the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s ongoing network
infrastructure upgrades and operational improvements. With hands‑on experience supporting the city’s full migration
from Cisco IE-3000 and IE-2000 switches to Etherwan edge switches, LLG has ensured a seamless transition while
maintaining Cisco IE‑5000 or newer switches at HUB aggregation points. Their familiarity with the city’s network
architecture extends to integrating SolarWinds SNMP monitoring across all field network elements, enhancing the city’s
operational resilience and proactive management capabilities.
Our team’s deep understanding of the City’s existing network topology and past splicing work positions us to deliver
targeted improvements that will reduce operational friction and improve long term performance. Currently, field teams
are splicing individually to each signal cabinet and treating each cabinet as its own VLAN, with some locations using
daisy chain connections rather than a standardized approach. That ad hoc practice, combined with varied splice methods
encountered during troubleshooting, made field diagnostics tedious and led to grouping attempts of only 5–6 locations
to limit scope. Through ongoing conversations with the City IT team, we believe the observed latency affecting fiber
communications devices is tied to the current VLAN and splicing configurations rather than hardware limitations.
Standardizing splicing practices, adopting consistent strand allocations per route, and consolidating logical segmentation
will simplify troubleshooting, reduce latency, and improve resilience.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
3. Project UnderstandingDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
8
Looking ahead, there are clear, practical steps to future proof the traffic and IT networks. Ensuring a documented,
citywide splicing standard and consistent VLAN design will enable predictable behavior across cabinets and daisy chain
locations and make network monitoring (SolarWinds/SNMP) far more effective. On the transport side, the existing
1 Gb links to the edge and 10 Gb aggregation to the HUBs (TMC/City Hall/traffic network) meet current needs, but
discussions about upgrading HUBs to 40 Gb are warranted and would provide meaningful headroom for future traffic
growth and advanced services. With our local experience and prior involvement in the City’s switch migrations and fiber
documentation, we can lead implementation of these standards, reduce field troubleshooting time, and help the City
achieve a more reliable, higher performance network now and into the future.
For example, signals located between two hubs may want to be respliced to communicate with both hubs. The figure
below illustrates local switches will communicate with two separate hubs to provide an extra level of redundancy for the
network especially if the mainline cable is cut for any reason.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
3. Project Understanding
Additionally, LLG has played a key role in facilitating shared use of dark fiber infrastructure between the city and the
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, significantly improving the reliability and uptime of police camera systems
city‑wide. Their support also includes assisting with the city’s ramp‑up of ISP services over RCMU fiber connections
to commercial and residential properties. Moreover, LLG has contributed to the comprehensive documentation of
fiber cabling, strands, and routes in ArcGIS, leveraging data from recent fiber improvement projects. This deep local
knowledge and active involvement position LLG as a critical partner in advancing the city’s traffic and IT network
modernization efforts.
Asset Management
With the City’s recent work in gathering and documenting their fiber infrastructure it is imperative to document the
current and future assets in the field. Arcadis’s inSIGHT AM solution is a comprehensive asset management and
maintenance platform designed for ITS devices, infrastructure, and related assets. It is used by transportation agencies
directly, and Arcadis on behalf of our clients, to centralize collection and updating of asset data, manage maintenance
throughout the assets’ lifecycle from purchase to retirement through intuitive web and mobile user interfaces. inSIGHT
AM empowers our clients to optimize maintenance and resource management, enhance budgeting accuracy, and
ultimately saving money through smarter, data-driven decisions.
• Simplify complex asset and intersection data collection and updates across thousands of devices
• Enhance field efficiency with barcode/QR scanning, automatic GPS location updates, photo uploads, task response and
completion times.
• Reduce downtime by shifting from reactive to predictive maintenance models
• Minimize overtime and maximize the availability of skilled labor, vehicles, and equipment with detailed maintenance
task management and assignment capabilities.
• Reduce administrative overhead and improve contract compliance with maintenance contractors
• Predict maintenance and replacement costs, track depreciation, and plan capital expenditures
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
9
For the purposes of the ATMS Phase 3 Project, Arcadis proposes to utilize our inSIGHT AM solution for the efficient
capture of Rancho Cucamonga’s asset / device / intersection data, provide the collected data to the City and support
generating the project reports. At the City’s request, Arcadis will provide a demonstration of the solution, and will provide
temporary access to inSIGHT AM following data collection.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
3. Project UnderstandingDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
No.Main Street Cross Street CCTV EVP VDS Cabinet Type Cabinet Location BBS ELBOW CONNECTOR Hub Cabinet SVC Cabinet Other Equipment Notes NEW CCTV NEW VDS NEW CABINET NEW BBS NEW CONTROLLER
1 Banyan Street -ALL SW Only Type R NE -TYPE III -Equestrian PPBs for E/W crossing -
2 Lemon Ave -ALL -Type P NW -TYPE III -Type R
3 Highland Ave -ALL -Type O SE -TYPE III License Plate Readers Type R
4 Archibald Ave
(N-S)19th St -ALL ALL Type O NE -TYPE III MAST ARM POINTED SOUTH VECTOR VDS Type R
5 -ALL -Type R NE -TYPE III -
-Baseline Rd
6 Church St -ALL -Type R SE -TYPE III -
7 Tyron St -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE II -
8 San Bernardino Rd -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE III -NO VECTOR VDS -
9 Foothill Blvd SE ALL ALL Type O NE 334 TYPE III -Type R
10 Arrow Route -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE III --
11 -ALL ALL Type P SW -TYPE III -NO VECTOR VDS Type R
12 Archibald Ave
(N-S)8th St -ALL ALL Type O NW -TYPE III POINTING EAST,
WIRELESS POINTING NORTH ON EVP ON SW AND NW POLE ARE BIDRECTIONAL Type R
13 Alta Cuesta Dr -NB/SB -Type P SE -TYPE III -BRIDGE / NO PULLBOXES ON BRIDGE / RC FIBER PULLBOXES Type R
14 Carnelian St -ALL EB Type R NE -TYPE III License Plate Readers VECTOR VDS -
15 Vineyard Ave -ALL ALL Type P SE -TYPE II -VECTOR VDS FOR EB/WB Type R
16 Beryl St -ALL -Type R SW -TYPE III -FYA SEEMS FAIRLY RECENTLY INSTALLED -
17 Hellman Ave -ALL ALL Type R NW -TYPE III -NO VECTOR VDS -
18 -EB/WB -Type R NW -TYPE III -NEW VDS NOT NEEDED FOR TRAIL XING -
19 Amethyst Ave -ALL ALL Type P NW -TYPE III -VECTOR VDS FOR EB/WB Type R
20 Archibald Ave -ALL -Type R NW 334 TYPE III --
21 Ramona Ave -ALL ALL Type P SW -TYPE III -VECTOR VDS FOR EB/WB Type R
22 Hermosa Ave -ALL -Type P NE -TYPE III --Type R
23 Haven Ave NE ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE II -ALL VECTOR VDS -
24 Valencia Ave -ALL -Type R NE -TYPE III -FYA FOR EB/WB -
25 Spruce Ave -ALL ALL Type R SE -TYPE II --
26 Central Park -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE III -ALL VECTOR VDS -
27 Milliken Ave -ALL ALL Type R NW -TYPE III NO VECTOR VDS -
28 Ellena West -ALL ALL Type R NW -TYPE III -NO VECTOR VDS -
29 Mountain View Dr -ALL ALL Type R SE -TYPE III --
30 Rochester Ave NW ALL ALL Type R NW 334 TYPE III --
31 -ALL ALL Type P NW -TYPE III -VECTOR VDS FOR EB/WB Type R
32 Day Creek Blvd -ALL ALL Type P NW -TYPE III ANTENNA ON NE POLE NO VECTOR VDS Type R
33 San Carmela Ct -SB/EB/WB ALL Type R NE -TYPE III -VECTOR VDS FOR EB/WB -
34 Base Line Rd
(E-W)Victoria Park Ln -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE III --
35 Base Line Rd
(E-W)Etiwanda Ave -ALL ALL Type R NW -TYPE III LICENSE PLATE READERS -
36 Base Line Rd
(E-W)Shelby Pl -ALL (SEE
NOTE/PICS)ALL Type R SE -TYPE III --
37 East Ave -ALL ALL Type R NE -TYPE III -NO VECTOR VDS -
EXISTING EQUIPMENT PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
See No. 20
3. Project Understanding
10The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
ATMS PHASE 3 PRELIMINARY INVENTORY
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PROJECT IMPROVEMENT AND OBSERVATION MAP
LEGEND:
Caltrans Signal
City Signal
H Ex. Type 334 Communication Hub
Video Detection System (VDS)
Wireless Radio (To Be Removed)
288 SMFO in Ex. Conduit
CCTV Camera
Type R Cabinet on Ex Foundation
Cobalt Controller
Proposed Improvements:
288 SMFO in New Conduit
Ea
s
t
A
v
e
Ar
c
h
i
b
a
l
d
A
v
e
Base Line Rd
H
H
H
Banyan Str
Lemon Ave
Highland Ave
19th St
Trail Xing
Church St
Tyron St
San Bernardino Rd
Foothill Blvd
Arrow Route
9th Str
8th Str
Al
t
a
C
u
e
s
t
a
D
r
Sh
e
l
b
y
A
v
e
Et
i
w
a
n
d
a
A
v
e
Vi
c
t
o
r
i
a
P
a
r
k
L
n
St
C
a
r
m
e
l
a
C
t
Da
y
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
Da
y
C
r
e
e
k
Mk
t
p
l
Ro
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
V
i
e
w
D
r
El
l
e
n
a
W
e
s
t
Mi
l
l
i
k
e
n
A
v
e
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
r
k
Sp
r
u
c
e
A
v
e
Va
l
e
n
c
i
a
A
v
e
Ha
v
e
n
A
v
e
He
r
m
o
s
a
A
v
e
Ra
m
o
n
a
A
v
e
Am
e
t
h
y
s
t
A
v
e
Tr
a
i
l
X
i
n
g
He
l
l
m
a
n
A
v
e
Be
r
y
l
S
t
Vi
n
e
y
a
r
d
A
v
e
Ca
r
n
e
l
i
a
n
S
t
CALTRANS
There appears to be existing
communication conduit across
the I-210 overpass on the
eastside of Archibald. An
encroachment permit will be
needed to see if CT will allow
the City to use the conduit.
Installing/strapping new
conduit to the bridge will be
too costly and cause delays.
CREEK CROSSING
Located the existing conduit
infrastructure crossing the
creek. There is a pull box on
each side.
CREEK CROSSING
Could not locate existing
conduit infrastructure.
According to documents,
multiple conduits pass
through here.
CREEK CROSSING
Located the existing conduit
infrastructure crossing the
creek. There is a pull box on
each side.
CALTRANS
The project will include
connecting the ramp signals
at Milliken/I-210 and Day
Creek/I-210 using the
existing fiber installed as
part of the Phase 2 project.
The encroachment permit
will include use of existing
conduit and installing
proposed equipment within
the cabinets.
Ex. SMFO in Ex. Conduit
TIMING:
Equestrian timing
considerations at
the two Trail Xing
Signals and
Banyan Street
3. Project Understanding
11The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
PROJECT IMPROVEMENT AND OBSERVATION MAP
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
4
PROJECT APPROACH
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
13
PROJECT APPROACH
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Arcadis strongly believes that excellent project management is essential to the successful completion of any project.
Successful completion does not only mean finishing the project but also completing the project to the client’s satisfaction
within budget and on schedule. Paul Frislie will lead this project from Arcadis’ Irvine office and will ensure an efficient
and coordinated project development process, delivery of a high‑quality product, and deployment of the project
components within budget and on schedule. This can be achieved with good initial planning at the onset of the project,
followed by monitoring the progress of each task and sub-task, and making necessary corrective actions should issues
arise. A well‑qualified team of local and regional ITS and transportation technology experts will support Paul with contract
management and technical guidance, as needed. Arcadis is joined by LLG to provide integration and central system
services, Dudek will use the expertise in the environmental space, and AimTD will provide efficient and timely turning
movement counts and ADTs.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
Arcadis aggressively pursues its commitment to quality for every task, deliverable and service. Every project deliverable
will be reviewed by the task leader and project manager. In the case where Mr. Frislie is also serving as the task leader,
then Arcadis’ Senior Advisor, Mr. Gabriel Murillo, will review the deliverable. Arcadis’ QA/QC program will include the
following procedures:
• Arcadis Project Manager, Mr. Frislie, will have the complete authority to direct all project efforts and call upon
corporate resources as required to satisfy the project’s needs.
• An internal (Arcadis team) kick‑off meeting will be held with key team members to clearly define the scope of services,
set responsibilities, establish schedules and identify goals and milestones.
• Project decisions will be documented and supported by appropriate data that will clearly show the choices evaluated
and the basis for Arcadis’ recommendations.
Schedule Control
Schedule control begins with the preparation of a detailed schedule that includes milestone completion dates for specific
tasks and the overall project. Arcadis will develop, as done for every project, a work plan that allocates person‑hour
commitments by individual for each task. Mr. Frislie will review weekly reports generated by Arcadis’ Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) system showing actual effort expended on each task. This internal control allows us to quickly make any
adjustments needed to maintain schedule and stay within budget.
Meetings
Arcadis understands that City staff have other duties to perform outside of this project, therefore Arcadis will strive
to be as efficient and effective as possible with your time. Thus, project management techniques will be modified to
meet the City’s needs. A project kick‑off meeting will be held with the City and appropriate stakeholders to determine
project goals, discuss the project schedule, and define lines of communication, as well as design criteria, requirements,
and procedures. Frequency of communication can vary depending on specific project needs, phase of the project, and
individual needs and styles of those involved in the project, from both the client and consultant perspective. Submittal
review meeting and monthly progress meetings (in person or over Teams) with City staff will be conducted throughout
the life of the project, as agreed to, based on further discussion with City staff. Arcadis will provide all agendas and
meeting minutes. Arcadis will also be responsible for submitting monthly progress reports to the City.
Project Management Dashboard
Throughout the course of the project, the Arcadis Team will use their comprehensive Project Manager dashboard
to provide detailed Project Status Reports to the City on a monthly basis. The dashboard will integrate the MS
Project Schedule sharing progress and dependencies, track submittals, checklists, equipment procurement status,
resource allocation, approvals, and critical tasks into a single user interface. The user interface will provide alerts,
activity dashboards, and reports. To ensure transparency and accountability, the status of each workgroup or project
workstream will be clearly delineated within the dashboard, providing the City with a detailed representation of team
efforts and overall project progress.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project ApproachDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The dashboard will identify both short‑term risks (those affecting the project within the next thirty days) and long‑term
risks (those extending sixty days or more into the future). For each risk, Arcadis will note the nature of the risk, potential
solutions, required actions for resolution, and the estimated duration needed to implement corrective measures. This
structured, proactive approach to status reporting will help the City maintain clear oversight of project health, anticipate
challenges, and ensure timely resolution of any emerging issues or risks.
14The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project Approach
Deliverable(s):
• A detailed project schedule encompassing the full scope of work to be provided at kickoff meeting.
• Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports
• Meeting Agendas and Minutes
TASK 2: AGENCY COORDINATION
Arcadis will coordinate with all affected agencies and stakeholders that are affected by the project. This includes Caltrans
District 8, San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBFCD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USAEC), neighboring
jurisdictions such as Upland, and all affected utility agencies. Arcadis will obtain all necessary permits and right‑of‑way
clearances.
Deliverable(s):
• Encroachment Permits
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
15
TASK 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS SIGNAL EVALUATION
Arcadis’s sub, AimTD will collect the necessary counts along both project corridors. The following counts are assumed to
be collected:
• ADT’s: 24‑hour bi‑directional for seven days
• Turning Movement Counts: 2 hours for 1‑day on the weekday (AM, Midday, PM) and 4‑hour peak on weekend.
Based on the counts and field inventory, the team will develop corridor-wide traffic models using Synchro software
to optimize the proposed signal timing. This process includes a detailed analysis of traffic flow patterns along the
corridor, enabling the identification of timing adjustments that improve overall traffic efficiency. Following the modeling
and optimization, a comprehensive summary report will be prepared to present the recommended traffic signal timing
modifications. This report will be submitted for City review and concurrence.
The summary report will detail key elements such as phase timing, controller options, and preemption/transition charts.
It will also include information on splits, offsets, and cycle lengths throughout the corridor. All recommendations will be
developed in strict accordance with City standard practices as well as industry best practices, ensuring that the proposed
signal timing enhancements are both effective and compliant with regulatory requirements.
Deliverable(s):
• Counts
• Summary Report
TASK 4: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS
The Arcadis team begins by meticulously identifying and gathering all existing as-built drawings and related
documentation to establish a comprehensive foundation for the project. Drawing on years of ITS and traffic signal
construction experience and lessons learned from previous projects, the team understands that accuracy in field reviews
and investigations is paramount to successful outcomes.
With this in mind, a detailed inventory will be conducted that includes critical components such as cabinets, controllers,
existing pull boxes, and conduits. Each of these elements is thoroughly field-verified to confirm their precise locations,
sizes and condition, recognizing that any discrepancies can significantly impact project execution. The field inventory and
review will be summarized into a detailed matrix similar to the one provided in the Project Understanding, the data will
also be used to produce high quality base plans for the design. As an added‑value, the inventory, data and pictures will
be inputted into Arcadis’ inSIGHT AM Platform to start tracking all the existing assets along both corridors.
Furthermore, the team will proactively coordinate with all relevant utility companies to obtain existing as-built records,
ensuring these are accurately reflected on the project plans. Any potential conflicts or required relocations are addressed
through close coordination with utility providers, minimizing risks and delays. This rigorous approach exemplifies the
Arcadis team’s dedication to precision and reliability, ensuring that all field data and documentation support a smooth
and efficient construction process. Arcadis will keep a utility log updated as the project progresses.
Deliverable(s):
• Field Notes and Pictures
• Detailed Inventory
• Utility Log
• inSIGHT AM Database and Platform Access
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project ApproachDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
16
TASK 5. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
As an integrated member of the Arcadis team, Dudek will work in concert with their leadership and leverage our
expertise and experience completing the environmental entitlement process in a timely and predictable manner. Their
capabilities will rely upon a high-level of institutional knowledge of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual and
the corresponding federal oversight and approval processes. Understanding the procedural steps is further enhanced by
their history working with the lead Caltrans technical reviewers and know what type of key issues they look for in both
technical and summary deliverables. The scope of work, deliverables, and assumptions provided below are based on the
referenced knowledge and expertise and will serve the City well with the completion of an expedited project approval.
CEQA Categorical Exemption
Dudek assumes the project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301(c). We will prepare
a Notice of Exemption (NOE) with supporting documentation and file it with the State Clearinghouse and San Bernardino
County Clerk. Filing fees are included.
NEPA Analysis
Dudek will draft the PES Form per LAPM Chapter 6, including project description and required attachments (location
figures, site photos, FTIP listing, air quality checklist, VIA questionnaire, IPaC species lists, wetlands/critical habitat
figures, FEMA flood hazard figures). We will conduct desktop research for historic properties and a CHRIS records
search (up to $1,840). If Section 106 is required, technical studies will be completed under Optional Task 5.
Assuming Caltrans concurrence, Dudek will prepare the NEPA Categorical Exclusion and submit for review to Arcadis,
City, and Caltrans. We anticipate up to two full review cycles and one refinement cycle.
Technical Studies
Dudek will conduct a Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA) per Caltrans and ASTM standards, evaluating potential
contamination, hazardous materials, and Caltrans-specific mitigation. The ISA will include review of uses, environmental
concerns (asbestos, lead, treated wood, hazardous electrical equipment), and temporary construction easements. A
licensed environmental professional will oversee the process.
Deliverable(s):
• Draft/Final NOE (MS Word & PDF)
• Draft/Final cover letter for NOE submittal (MS Word & PDF)
• NOE upload to State Clearinghouse (CEQA Submit)
• Hard copy NOE/cover letter mailed to Clerk of the Board
• Draft/Final PES Form with attachments (MS Word & PDF)
• Draft/Final NEPA Categorical Exclusion with Continuation Sheets (MS Word & PDF)
• Draft/Final Phase I ISA (MS Word & PDF)
TASK 6: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES (PS&E)
Plans
Based on the field review and preliminary design discussions with the City, the Arcadis Team will provide as needed
design plans, cost estimates and specifications documents for the improvements. Based on project understanding and
our preliminary field investigations, it is anticipated that the plans will include the following sheet counts, scale, and QA/
QC lead for each submittal It is understood that the overall design and sheet count may change after full detailed field
work is completed and the scope is refined after discussions and meetings with the City.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project ApproachDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
17
The plans will conform to the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will reference the latest edition of the
CA MUTCD and the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. Arcadis will meet with the City at each review to discuss
the design and address comments.
Arcadis will prepare the plans to be submitted to the City for review at the 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% level. The Final
plans will be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer.
Specifications
Arcadis will prepare specifications and contract documents using the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s boilerplate. The
specifications will be submitted along with the plans to the City with the 90% and final submittals for approval. Arcadis
will also prepare any technical special provisions relating to the design work, if needed, and will follow the most recent
City format. All the traffic engineering design will conform to the Caltrans standard specifications and Standard Plans.
Cost Estimates
Arcadis will prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate to be included in the 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% submittals.
A final Contract Item List (Bid Sheet) for all work items shown on the plans will be prepared for the final submittal. The
cost estimate will include quantities and unit costs with back‑up information as necessary.
Deliverable(s):
• 30%, 60%, 90%, 100% Plans and Cost Estimates
• 90% and Final Specifications
TASK 7: SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS
The Arcadis team will develop new time-of-day timing sheets tailored for each traffic condition, weekday peak, weekday
off‑peak, and weekend, for all signal locations within both project corridors. These timing sheets will be prepared in
the City’s required Cobalt controller format and delivered in both electronic and hardcopy versions to facilitate accurate
cabinet installation and controller configuration.
The Arcadis Team bring in-depth, practical experience with Cobalt controllers and the EOS firmware, gained from multiple
deployments and field integrations. This expertise ensures the timing sheets are not only technically correct but also
optimized for real-world controller behavior and firmware nuances, reducing commissioning time and minimizing the
need for in‑field adjustments.
To ensure full alignment with City needs, the deliverables include up to two rounds of revisions to incorporate City
comments. This collaborative, iterative approach combined with our controller-specific knowledge, ensures the final
timing sheets meet operational requirements, streamline installation, and deliver reliable, efficient signal performance
across the corridor.
Deliverable(s):
• Timing Sheets
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project Approach
Type # of Sheets Scale Milestones QA/QC Leads Comments
Title Sheet 1 N/A
General and Construction Notes 1 N/A
Communication (Fiber in New Conduit)3 1"=40'Archibald b/t Banyan to Highland and 210EB Ramp to Lomita
Communication (Fiber in Existing Conduit)20 1"=40'
Traffic Signal Modification Plans 18 1"=20'These plans will be mainly be for VDS and CCTV installations. We will want to be
accurate for new cable installs in existing conduit and fill ratios.
Overall Communication Schematic 1 N/A
Fiber Assignment Details ~5 N/A
Traffic Control Plans ~4 1"=40'
General Details ~4 N/A Details may cover conduit, pull box, camera installations
Approx. Total ~57
Gabe Murillo and
Paul Frislie will
Lead the QA/QC
effort for all
Submittals
30%
60%
90%
Final
(For All
Sheets)
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
18
TASK 8: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Arcadis will provide construction support to City inspection staff. During construction, Arcadis staff will help the City
staff approve traffic control, review RFIs, daily reports, etc. Arcadis will make onsite inspections to check the quality and
quantity of the work performed by all trades, if needed. This will assist the City in avoiding defects and deficiencies in the
work of the Contractor. As necessary, Arcadis will inspect construction to evaluate the Contractor’s compliance with the
intent of the construction documents. In support of this task, Arcadis will conduct the following activities:
• Provide support during the bid process for any RFI’s submitted by potential contractors.
• Help the City prepare any needed addendums before bid opening pertaining to the PS&E package.
• Attend the pre-construction meeting and provide technical guidance with regards to the PS&E package.
• Review project construction schedule.
• Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) and, if necessary, revise and/or modify plans based on construction
changes made in the field.
• Be available for construction site visits to assist with resolution of problems that arise during construction.
• Respond to RFIs & revise and/or modify plans based on construction changes made in the field.
• Assist City staff in the preparation of contract change orders.
• Participate in the final walk‑through ensuring compliance with construction requirements and providing a thorough
“punch‑list” of items that must be corrected and/or completed to satisfy the project requirements.
Following construction, Arcadis will coordinate with the City Inspector/Construction Manager to develop as-built
drawings. The City will provide Arcadis with the red-line markups of changes made during construction and Arcadis will
transfer that information to the CAD drawings to provide the City with full size reproducible as-built plans.
Deliverable(s):
• Final As-Builts
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project Approach
TASK 9: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND INTEGRATION
As part of the project scope, the new proposed signal
timing will be implemented into the City’s central
management system for all intersections within the
corridor. This implementation will include creating
intersection nodes specifically for the Base Line
Road and Archibald Avenue signals. The process
encompasses not only updating signal timing and
phasing configurations but also establishing and
assigning the necessary IP addresses for each
intersection. These efforts will ensure that all
intersections are fully integrated into the central
management system, enabling coordinated control
and real‑time monitoring in alignment with the City’s
standards and operational requirements. Once the
project is complete, a final inventory will be performed
to log all the proposed assets that were installed during
construction. It will be logged into the inSIGHT AM
platform and allow the city to have a real-time database
of what was installed with the ability to expand city-wide.
Deliverable(s):
• Updated IP Schema
• Final Timing Plans
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
19
TASK 10: PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING
Following the completion of construction, monthly after-studies will be conducted for up to one year to assess the
effectiveness of the implemented signal timing improvements. These ongoing studies will build upon the analysis
conducted in Task 3, with a focus on evaluating operational enhancements throughout the corridor.
A post-implementation evaluation will measure key performance indicators such as travel time, intersection delay, and
stop frequency. Field adjustments will be made as needed to fine ‑tune operations. Comprehensive documentation
of the final timing plans and their benefits will be provided to support ongoing monitoring and future optimization
efforts. Arcadis developed advanced tools to obtain immediate feedback with the measured improvements along the
corridors. The image below displays this tool comparing operations performance month to month as well as year to year
along the project corridor with multiple key performance metrics to verify the optimized timing provides the expected
improvements for traffic. This type of information is extremely valuable to verify improvements obtained after fine-tuning
and to ensure the performance is maintained during the post construction phase.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project Approach
A comprehensive summary report will be prepared to present the study findings. The report will include clear visuals
that illustrate travel time improvements and will thoroughly document any recommended further timing adjustments.
Additionally, the report will quantify the benefits realized from the signal timing modifications, such as time savings
for motorists and environmental advantages, including reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This approach
will ensure that the City and stakeholders are provided with transparent, data-driven insights into the operational and
environmental impacts of the project.
Deliverable(s):
• Monthly Summary Reports
Exclusions:
• Civil/roadway design related to sidewalk, ADA ramps, pavement, etc.
• Utility relocation design
• Potholing for new conduit, or possible signal pole. It is anticipated that new signal poles will not be needed for this project.
• Items or submittals not specifically mentioned are excluded.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
20
OPTIONAL TASK 11. CULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL STUDIES
Cultural Resources
If Caltrans determines the project is not a screened undertaking under its Section 106 Programmatic Agreement, our sub
Dudek will conduct cultural resources technical studies to comply with Section 106 of the NHPA and CEQA.
• Caltrans Consultation: Conduct three coordination meetings with Dudek cultural staff, project engineers, Caltrans, and
the City.
• Area of Potential Effects (APE) Map: Develop and provide up to three versions of the APE map on aerial backgrounds,
incorporating project details from City GIS/CAD data.
• Coordination with NAHC: Review Sacred Lands File, notify Native American contacts via certified mail/email, and follow
up by phone. City will lead tribal consultation under CEQA; Caltrans will manage Section 106 tribal consultation.
• Cultural Resources Survey: Conduct field survey of 10 built environment resources (2 historians for 2 days),
archaeological survey of undeveloped areas (1 archaeologist for 1 day), windshield survey of developed areas.
Assumes no access issues or Native American monitor needed, and no cultural resources found.
• Archaeological Survey Report (ASR): Prepare report documenting archaeological survey results, assuming no
previously recorded resources requiring updates.
• Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER): Evaluate 10 historic-era resources; assume none are significant so
no Finding of Effect report needed. Provide up to three electronic versions (2 drafts, 1 final). Assumes only editorial
comments from City/Caltrans/SHPO.
• Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR): Prepare narrative report compiling APE map, ASR, HRER, and attachments
for Section 106 compliance. Up to three revision rounds anticipated. No SHPO review expected.
Biological Resources
Dudek will prepare a Natural Environmental Study for Minimal Impacts (NES ‑MI) based on a field survey and desktop
review to characterize biological resources impacts consistent with Caltrans requirements.
• Desktop Review: Analyze CDFW CNDDB, CNPS, USFWS species lists, USGS soils/elevation, hydrography, and wetlands
inventory to identify sensitive species or habitats within project and 100‑foot buffer.
• Biological Resources Survey: Conduct field inventory of plant and animal species and map observable sensitive
resources.
• Natural Environmental Study for Minimal Impacts: Prepare NES ‑MI report including project description, survey
methods, environmental setting, impact discussion, avoidance/minimization measures, and summary of consistency
with conservation policies. Briefly discuss potential mitigation.
Deliverable(s):
• Draft/Final APE Map, HRER, ASR, and HPSR
• Draft/Final NES-MI Report
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
4. Project ApproachDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
5
QUALIFICATIONS &
EXPERIENCE
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
FIRM PROFILE
Year Founded
Arcadis U.S., Inc. was founded
in 1957, and our Parent
Company Arcadis N.V. was
founded in 1888
Form of Organization
Corporation
Number of Employees
13 offices in CA with
700+ Employees
Local Office
Irvine, CA
18401 Von Karman
Avenue, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Headquarters
Highlands Ranch, C0
630 Plaza Drive,
Suite 200, Highlands
Ranch, Colorado, CO
Project Manager
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III
M +1 562-234-5286
paul.frislie@arcadis.com
Arcadis is a global engineering, construction management, and environmental
consulting firm with more than 36,000 employees in over 70 countries, dedicated
to improving quality of life.
Our mobility practice supports the planning, design, implementation, and operation
of transportation systems, including traffic signal infrastructure, intelligent
transportation systems (ITS), and advanced traffic management systems (ATMS).
With the integration of IBI Group in 2022, Arcadis expanded its capabilities in
smart mobility, digital infrastructure, and technology-enabled transportation
solutions.
Arcadis maintains a strong presence across California with more than 700
professionals statewide, providing engineering, planning, and program
management services to local and regional agencies.
Types of Services and Capabilities
Arcadis provides extensive services and capabilities in Southern California
and across the United States in the following areas:
PENDING LITIGATION
Arcadis U.S., Inc., and its related and affiliated North American entities (collectively, “Arcadis”), has various
legal proceedings pending at any given time. Such claims are disputed and not reasonably expected to be
adversely determined, applicable insurance is available, and/or such claims are not reasonably expected to
materially impact the financial condition or the operations of Arcadis, nor will they affect Arcadis’ ability to fully
perform the applicable services. These occurrences represent a nominal percentage of Arcadis’ total projects
at a frequency understood to be commensurate with or below industry standards for companies of similar size
doing projects of similar type and volume. Please refer to the 5‑year Litigation History on the following page.
120+
offices
70+
countries
40,000+
projects annually
8,700+
employees
36,000+
employees
NORTH AMERICA
WORLDWIDE
IMPROVING QUALITY
OF LIFE SINCE 1957
700+
employees
68+
years
5. Qualifications & Experience
22The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
• Traffic Engineering and Traffic Studies
• Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS) and ATMS Engineering
• Traffic Signal Design and Operations
• Signal Timing Optimization and Corridor Synchronization
• ITS Systems Integration and
Communications Infrastructure
• Transportation Planning and Corridor
Studies
• Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Planning and Deployment
• Fiber Optic Interconnect and
Communications Design
• Environmental Documentation and
Permitting
• Roadway and Complete Streets Design
• Utility Coordination and Agency Coordination
• Construction Support and
Construction Management
• Program and Project Management
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
5. Qualifications & Experience
23The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Updated Q4 2025
Litigation Five-Year History:Arcadis U.S., Inc. and All Affiliates
Plaintiff Defendant (Arcadis
Affiliate)Date Suit Filed Nature of Incident Type of Claim Jurisdiction Business Line Government
Claim (Y/N)
Resolution
1 = Case Ongoing
2 = Dismissal
3 = Resolved/Settled
4 = Judgment
5 = N/A
Longo-En Tech De
Puerto Rico, LLC Arcadis Caribe, PSC Aug-25 Contractor alleges it was improperly defaulted and terminated on Vega
Baja Truck Sewer project Prof. Liability San Juan Water N 1
Ilidio Duarte Arcadis of New York, Inc.Jul-25 Plaintiff claiming personal injury on project site General Liability Bronx Cnty, NY Water N 1
Longo-En Tech De
Puerto Rico, LLC Arcadis Caribe, PSC Jul-25 Contractor alleges it was improperly defaulted and terminated on Los
Angeles and Loiza projects Prof. Liability San Juan Water N 1
Adolph Coletti Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jul-25 Former employee claims wrongful termination Employment Sussex Mobiliy N 1
Cuellar/Parra Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-25 The estate of Victor Parra alleges wrongful death claims.Prof. Liability Cobb County, GA Mobiliy N 1
Narendra and Bela
Desai Arcadis U.S., Inc.Mar-25 Plaintiff N. Besai is claiming personal injury for a trip and fall. Plaintiff B.
Besai is filing a loss of consortium claim.General Liability Los Angeles Cnty,
CA Env N 1
Mora, Aristoteles Arcadis of New York, Inc.Mar-25 Plaintiff claiming personal injury near project site due to trip and fall.General Liability Bronx Cnty, NY Water N 1
Tsai et al.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-25 Plaintiffs claiming damages related to work performed at East
Palestine,OH derailment of Norfolk Southern Railway Company.Prof. Liability Cuyahoga Co., OH Env N 1
Hickman et al.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-25 Plaintiffs claiming damages related to work performed at East
Palestine,OH derailment of Norfolk Southern Railway Company.Prof. Liability Franklin Co., OH Env N 1
Taylor et al.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-25 Plaintiffs claiming damages related to work performed at East
Palestine,OH derailment of Norfolk Southern Railway Company.Prof. Liability Franklin Co., OH Env N 1
Schuller Contractors,
Inc.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jan-25 Plaintiff claim personal injury due to negligent traffic pattern direction in
construction zone.Prof. Liability Orange Cnty, FL Water N 1
Vassiliou, Andreas Arcadis U.S., Inc.Dec-24 Former employee seeks damages due to loss of time.Employment Queens Cnty, NY Corp N 1
Jahangiri, Jay Arcadis U.S., Inc.Dec-24 Plaintiff and former employee claims discrimination and wrongful
termination.Employment California Corp N 1
Jones, Joseph Arcadis Canada Inc.Dec-24 Employment action filed by Plaintiff and former employee.Employment Canada Corp N 1
Kayani, Iqra Arcadis U.S., Inc.Dec-24
Plaintiff claims wrongful termination in violation of the California Fair
Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), as well as Title VII of the Federal
Civil Rights Act.
Employment California Corp N 1
Kessler, Jayne Arcadis U.S., Inc. (FKA The
Rise Group, LLC)Nov-24 Plaintiff claims personal injury at project site.General Liability Cook County, IL Places N 2
Benjamin, Sarah Arcadis U.S., Inc.Oct-24 Plaintiff claims discrimination and wrongful termination in violation of the
California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”).Employment California Corp N 1
Pollard, Angela Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-24 Plaintiff claiming damages for negligence on performance of indoor
assessment.Prof. Liability Dallas, TX Env N 1
Caycedo, Juan Arcadis Inc.May-24 Former employee of IBI seeks injunctive relief from post-employment
restrictions, allegedly due to Arcadis Inc.'s breach of contract. Breach of Contract Delaware Env N 1
CPL Architects,
Engineers, Landscape
Architect, D.P.C.
Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-24 Plaintiff claiming breach of contract.Prof. Liability Gwinnett Mobiliy N 3
O'Dwyer, Aidan DPS Holding Company LLC Mar-24 Former employee litigation.Employment Corp N 3
Vettes, Patricia DPS Holding Company LLC Mar-24 Former employee litigation.Employment Corp N 1
Belanger, David Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jan-24 Plaintiff claims personal injury for failure to maintain safe work area.General Liability Juneau, AK Places N 1
Wil-O's Seafood LLC Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-24 Plaintiff claiming damages due to flawed water testing methodology.Prof. Liability Iberville Parish, LA Env N 1
Everett, et al.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jan-24 Plaintiff claiming discrimination and retaliation arising out of GDOT District 7 MEI
contract.Other N. District Atlanta Mobiliy N 3
Walbridge Arcadis G&M of North Carolina,
Inc.Jan-24 Plaintiff alleges project did not meet design requirements and claiming damages for
redesign.Prof. Liability TBD Places N 3
Sicilian, Paul Arcadis U.S., Inc. / Elevated
Solutions JV Nov-23 Plaintiff claiming personal injury caused by exposure to epoxy.General Liability Cook County, IL Mobiliy N 1
Calderon, Efrain Arcadis Caribe, P.S.C.Sep-23 Former employee claiming dismissal without cause.Employment Bayamon, San Juan Corp N 3
Olmert, Keith DPS Advanced Technology
Group, Inc.Aug-23 Plaintiff claiming unlawful discriminatory practice.Employment NY State Division of
Human Rights Corp N 3
Romero and Olmos Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-23 Motor vehicle accident between Plaintiffs and Arcadis vehicle operated by employee.General Liability Middlesex, NJ Env N 3
Kirk and Kirk Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-23
Motor vehicle accident occurred within Arcadis construction work zone on client's
project. Arcadis employee witnessed accident and provided a statement. Arcadis
was served as a third-party defendant.
Prof. Liability Nassau County, NY Env N 2
Hiestand Arcadis U.S., Inc. / Elevated
Solutions JV Aug-23 Plaintiff claims personal injury for failure to maintain safe work area.General Liability Cook County, IL Mobiliy N 3
Beach and Beach Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jul-23 Employee driving an Enterprise rental vehicle and was allegedly involved in a motor
vehicle accident with the Plaintiffs. Auto Camden, NJ Env N 3
Robert Rivers Arcadis CE Jun-23 Plaintiff claiming personal injury at project site due to trip and fall.General Liability New York Water N 1
GS Labs LLC Arcadis U.S., Inc.May-23 Plaintiff filed demand and is seeking reimbursement from Cigna for COVID testing
provided under Arcadis U.S., Inc.'s self-funded health plan (Cigna). Employment Colorado Corp N 3
Arcadis U.S., Inc.USACE NDNODS Apr-23
Appeal before Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of COFD’s decision
denying Plaintiff’s claim regarding differing site conditions/cardinal change under
Contract Order No. WD912DR18F0689
Appeal ASBCA Env Y 1
Jean, Javon Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-23
Plaintiff claiming personal injury at property allegedlly owned by Arcadis in NY.
Arcadis does not own the property. Subsequent third party action filed by Defendant
Alliance Energy against Arcadis seeking indemnification and defense.
General Liability Kings Cnty, NY ---N 1
Melito Construction (Stop
& Shop)Arcadis of NY, Inc.Jan-23 Third party complaint seeking indemnification and defense due to allegations of
personal injury on job site.General Liability New York Env N 1
Dulcio, Mark Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jan-23 Plaintiff is alleging violations of Federal, State and Local laws and seeking damages.Prof. Liability Fed. Dist. Ct. - S.D. Fla.Env N 3
Marrerro, San Juanita Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-22 Employee driving an Arcadis-owned vehicle was allegedly involved in a motor vehicle
accident with the Plaintiffs. Auto Nueces, TX Env N 3
Byrkett, Anthony Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-22 Plaintiff and former Arcadis employee alleges non-payment of overtime wages.Employment Northern District, IL Corp N 2
Garnett, Brian Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-22 Plaintiff alleges insufficient surveying services provided by Chesapeake Bay Site
Solutions, Inc. owned by former Arcadis employee Prof. Liability Virginia Beach, VA Water N 2
Griffin, et al. Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-22 Plaintiff alleges breach of fiduciary duty, interference with contract, implied
contractual indemnity, and unfair competition.Other Los Angeles Cnty, CA Places N 1
Hyland, Kevin Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jun-22 Plaintiff alleges personal injury at project site General Liability Mahoning County, OH Water N 3
Asif, Mahmood Arcadis Canada Inc.Apr-22 Plaintiff claiming personal injury at project site General Liability Canada N 1
Tompkins Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-22 Plaintiff alleges negligence at project site resulting in serious injury Prof. Liability Allen Cnty, IN Water N 1
Ayala-Hinkle, Prince Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-22 Plaintiff alleges negligence at project site resulting in physical, mental, and emotional
well-being Prof. Liability Sacramento Cnty, CA Env N 2
University Spine Arcadis U.S., Inc.Mar-22 Plaintiff seeks recovery from employee medical plan after out-of-network procedure Other Passiac Cnty, NJ Corp N 2
Commonwealth Edison Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-22 Plaintiff filed claim for damages due to utility strike General Liability Cook County, IL Env N 3
Tucker, Jerry Arcadis U.S., Inc.Nov-21 Plaintiff alleges personal injury due to trip and fall at Hillairy Avenue project site General Liability Morris Cnty, NJ Env N 3
BHC Arcadis U.S., Inc. / Arcadis CE Nov-21 Plaintiff claim is for damages and injunctive relief alleging Defendants were
substantial factors causing and/or contributing to the Woolsey Fire in 2018 Prof. Liability Los Angeles Cnty, CA Env N 2
The following is a summary of all litigation for the preceding five years. Such claims are disputed and not reasonably expected to be adversely determined, applicable
insurance is available, and/or such claims are not reasonably expected to materially impact the financial condition or the operations of Arcadis.
ARCADIS Confidential
*Without Prejudice
Page 1 of 2
CONFIDENTIAL
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
5. Qualifications & Experience
24The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Updated Q4 2025
Litigation Five-Year History:Arcadis U.S., Inc. and All Affiliates
Plaintiff Defendant (Arcadis
Affiliate)Date Suit Filed Nature of Incident Type of Claim Jurisdiction Business Line Government
Claim (Y/N)
Resolution
1 = Case Ongoing
2 = Dismissal
3 = Resolved/Settled
4 = Judgment
5 = N/A
The following is a summary of all litigation for the preceding five years. Such claims are disputed and not reasonably expected to be adversely determined, applicable
insurance is available, and/or such claims are not reasonably expected to materially impact the financial condition or the operations of Arcadis.
Brice Environmental
Services Corp.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-21 Plaintiff claims Arcadis' use of soil washing technology infringed on patent.Other USDC AK Env N 3
AG3 Group, LLC Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-21 Alleged cyber incident claiming Arcadis systems were compromised causing
misdirected wire transfer.Other Bexar Water N 3
Holmes/Cleveland Arcadis U.S., Inc.Sep-21 An Arcadis employee was allegedly involved in a motor vehicle accident with the
Plaintiffs. Auto Ouachita Parish, LA Water N 2
Sondhi, Rajiv Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-21 Former employee discrimination dispute related to employment agreement and
benefits (EEOC) Employment Highlands Ranch, CO Corp N 3
Edgewater Pearl Cond
Assoc.Arcadis U.S., Inc.Aug-21 Plaintiff alleges negligence in consulting related to contamination of soils General Liability Bergen Cnty, NJ Env N 1
Greenberg, Solomon Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jul-21 Plaintiff alleges injury due to trip and fall General Liability Palm Beach Cnty, FL Infra N 2
B.L. Harbert Int'l, LLC Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jul-21 Plaintiff alleges refusal to amend contract due to change orders impacting contract
price and completion date Breach of Contract Jefferson Cnty, AL Infra N 2
Beer, Robert Arcadis U.S., Inc.Jun-21 Former Arcadis employee was allegedly involved in a motor vehicle accident with
Plaintiff Auto Allegheny County, PA Env N 3
NYCDEP Arcadis of NY / AECOM JV Jun-11 Plaintiff alleges damages due to schedule delays, breach of contract and design
errors Breach of Contract New York, NY Water N`1
Cameron et al.Arcadis U.S., Inc. / Arcadis
G&M of NC Jun-21 Plaintiffs as employees of the City of Durham’s Waste Management Department
alleged exposure to hazardous levels of arsenic and lead Prof. Liability Durham, NC Env N 3
Davis, Andrew Arcadis U.S., Inc.May-21 Software development ownership litigation Other Austin, TX Env N 3
Sanchez, Adrian Arcadis U.S., Inc.May-21 Plaintiff alleges discrimination (EEOC)Employment New York, NY Corp N 2
Aguirre, Jacquelyn Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-21 Plaintiff alleges wrongful death due to failure to maintain premises in a safe condition Prof. Liability Fresno, CA Infra N 2
Helwig, Tonya Arcadis U.S., Inc.Apr-21 Plaintiff alleges a personal injury due to a slip and fall General Liability Philadelphia, PA Env N 3
Bagley Arcadis U.S., Inc.Feb-21 The estate of Justin Bagley alleges wrongful death claims General Liability Clayton County, GA Infra N 3
Gonzalez CTR Joint Venture Dec-20 Plaintiff alleges personal injury as a result of a fall from bicycle in construction zone General Liability Cook County, IL Water N 3
Gallagher Arcadis U.S., Inc.Oct-20 Plaintiff alleges personal injury due to failure to maintain premises in a safe condition General Liability San Diego, CA Infra N 3
Perez Arcadis U.S., Inc. / Arcadis CE Oct-20 Plaintiff alleges failure to maintain premises in a safe condition.General Liability New York, NY Water N 3
ARCADIS Confidential
*Without Prejudice
Page 2 of 2
CONFIDENTIAL
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
5. Qualifications & Experience
25The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS The table below highlights representative Arcadis projects that demonstrate our team’s capabilities in traffic engineering, traffic signal operations, and ITS planning within the last five years. All work shown
reflects experience completed by current Arcadis staff proposed for this on-call contract.
Relevant Project Name Location Brief Summary of Project Project Timeline Team Member
Involvement
Kraemer Blvd/Glassell St/
Grand Ave Corridor Regional Traffic
Signal Synchronization
Santa Ana, CA
This design‑build project modernizes a 15‑mile, 61‑intersection regional corridor spanning six jurisdictions by upgrading traffic signal and
communication infrastructure. The work includes deploying new fiber optic and wireless radio systems, installing advanced traffic signal
controllers and cabinets, and optimizing timing at four Caltrans ramp intersections to improve coordination with adjacent arterials. By integrating
a robust, modern ITS network, the project enhances real‑time traffic management capabilities, reduces congestion, and strengthens regional
mobility for the communities served.
2025 - 2028
Braulio Ramirez
Paul Frislie
Alex Ingoglia
Evan Shipley
Ciera Fernandez
OCTA Baseline
Countywide Signal Timing Orange County, CA
Baseline is a signal timing optimization project that involves optimizing over 2,500 intersections. The Arcadis portion is about 450 intersections in
South Orange County from Mission Viejo to the County Line in San Clemente. Arcadis is developing a modern approach to signal timing analysis,
optimization and on-going operation and maintenance for the region of signals by utilizing modern probe data collection systems, probe safety
data systems and innovative new AI algorithms developed by Arcadis Engineers.
2025 - 2029
Gabriel Murillo
Alex Ingoglia
Evan Shipley
Ciera Fernandez
Matt Glasser
OCTA Harbor Boulevard Pilot
Innovative Transit Signal Priority
(TSP) Study
Orange County, CA
Arcadis supported OCTA in evaluating innovative Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and multimodal detection technologies along the 12‑mile Harbor
Boulevard corridor serving more than 10,000 daily bus riders across five cities. The project included analysis of 60 signalized intersections and
development of a corridor‑wide TSP conceptual plan to improve bus speed and reliability. Arcadis led project management and technical analysis,
including corridor operations assessment and proof-of-concept TSP deployment in the City of Fullerton. Based on the success of the study and
pilot, Arcadis was recently selected by OCTA to support the next phase of corridor-wide TSP expansion.
2024 - 2026
Paul Frislie
Gabriel Murillo
Matt Glasser
Patrick Jacks
McFadden Avenue
Transit Signal Priority (TSP)
Pilot
Santa Ana, CA
Arcadis led the planning, evaluation, and concept design for a cloud‑based Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system along McFadden Avenue to
improve travel time and reliability for OCTA Route 66. The project included a needs assessment, vendor demonstrations, and concept plan
development leading to the recommended TSP solution, which is now being procured, deployed, and evaluated in coordination with OCTA and the
City.
2025 - 2027
Paul Frislie
Gabriel Murillo
Alex Ingoglia
Brianne Garcia
Ciera Fernandez
Matt Glasser
Patrick Jacks
City of Orange On-Call Traffic
Engineering Services Orange, CA
Arcadis was recently awarded an on-call contract with the City of Orange to provide as-needed traffic engineering services in support of municipal
operations and capital projects. Services will include traffic studies, traffic signal design and timing, ITS support, plan check, construction support,
traffic control plans, and general traffic engineering services to augment City staff capacity.
2025 - 2028
Paul Frislie
Braulio Ramirez
Gabriel Murillo
Evan Shipley
Alex Ingoglia
City of Tustin On-Call Traffic
Engineering Services Tustin, CA
Arcadis was recently awarded an on-call contract with the City of Tustin to provide traffic engineering and transportation support services.
The contract allows the City to issue task orders for services including traffic signal operations, ITS integration, traffic and civil design, and
transportation planning. Arcadis will deliver PS&E packages, traffic signal and ITS design, traffic control plans, and construction support while
coordinating closely with City staff and ensuring compliance with applicable City, state, and federal standards.
2026 - 2029
Paul Frislie
Braulio Ramirez
Gabriel Murillo
Evan Shipley
Alex Ingoglia
City of Fountain Valley Citywide
ITS Support Services Fountain Valley, CA
Arcadis provided support to the City of Fountain Valley to provide advice with changes being implemented on the City’s fiber optic communication
system and Ethernet networking configurations. This contract was focused on the continuity of services that Arcadis Engineers have been
providing the City for over 15 years while at another company.
2024 - 2028
Gabriel Murillo
Paul Frislie
Braulio Ramirez
Alex Ingoglia
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
6
PROJECT TEAM
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
TEAM ORGANIZATION
Arcadis, a global leader with a strong presence in California, operates offices in key cities such as Irvine, Los Angeles,
San Diego, and San Francisco. This strategic network enables the firm to allocate significant resources to specialized
areas like Traffic Engineering, Traffic Signal Synchronization, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) throughout the
state. The proposed project team structure, detailed in the table below, underscores Arcadis’ commitment to assembling
a highly skilled and efficient team focused on exceeding project expectations.
The depth and breadth of Arcadis’ local, national, and global resources enable the company to respond quickly and
effectively to the demands of complex projects, delivering timely and efficient completion. Arcadis has a proven track
record of providing innovative solutions and has earned a reputation for excellence in the industry.
For this project, Arcadis has assembled a multidisciplinary team with clearly defined responsibilities to deliver the City’s
ATMS Phase III improvements. Paul Frislie will serve as Project Manager and lead Tasks 1 and 8, overseeing project
management, agency coordination, and construction support to ensure efficient delivery and seamless integration with
the City’s existing signal and communications infrastructure. Evan Shipley will lead Tasks 2 and 4, supporting existing
conditions evaluation, traffic analysis, and signal timing development. Alex Ingoglia will lead Tasks 3, 7, and 10,
managing PS&E development, central system integration, and performance monitoring activities. Braulio Ramirez will
lead Task 6, supporting signal timing sheet development and implementation.
Our subconsultant partners provide specialized expertise to support successful project delivery. Jason Reynolds of
Dudek will lead Task 5, overseeing environmental documentation and permitting, while Felipe Ortega of LLG will lead
Task 9, supporting construction engineering and system implementation. Gabriel Murillo will serve as Senior Advisor,
providing strategic guidance on ATMS architecture, traffic signal operations, and ITS systems integration. Together, this
team brings extensive experience delivering corridor signal synchronization, ITS deployments, and ATMS improvements
for public agencies throughout Southern California.
Arcadis has partnered with LLG, a local engineering firm with extensive experience supporting the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s traffic signal and communications infrastructure. LLG will support Tasks 7, 8, and 9, contributing expertise
in system integration, communications infrastructure, and construction services. Their team has recently assisted the
City with upgrades to field network switches, integration of devices into the City’s SolarWinds network monitoring
platform, coordination of shared dark fiber infrastructure with the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, and
documentation of the City’s fiber network in ArcGIS. This recent work provides LLG with strong familiarity with the City’s
communications systems and will support efficient project implementation.This collaboration strengthens the Arcadis
project team’s understanding of the local context, allowing us to deliver solutions that are both relevant and impactful for
the communities we serve.
Arcadis has also partnered with Dudek, an environmental, planning, and engineering consulting firm with extensive
experience supporting public infrastructure projects throughout California. Dudek will support Tasks 2 and 5, providing
expertise in environmental review, regulatory compliance, and planning coordination. Their team brings strong
familiarity with regional permitting requirements and has previously collaborated with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
on infrastructure and planning initiatives. Dudek’s experience navigating complex regulatory processes will help ensure
project improvements advance efficiently while meeting all applicable environmental requirements.
In addition, Arcadis has engaged AimTD to support traffic data collection for the project. AimTD will assist with field data
collection efforts, including turning movement counts, pedestrian counts, and traffic volume data needed to support the
corridor traffic analysis and signal timing development. Their experienced field teams and proven methodologies will
provide accurate and reliable data to support Synchro modeling and the development of optimized signal timing plans for
the project corridors.
6. Project Team
27The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
LEGEND
Task Lead Arcadis (A)
Key Personnel Dudek (D)
LLG Engineers (LLG)
AimTD (AIM)
TASK 4 Preliminary Investigations
TASK 5 Environmental Compliance
TASK 3 Existing Conditions Signal Evaluation
TASK 8 Construction Support
TASK 9 Central Management System and Integration
TASK 10 Performance Monitoring and Reporting
TASK 2 Agency Coordination
TASK 7 Signal Timing Sheets
TASK 1 Project Management TASK 6 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III A
Braulio Ramirez, PE A
Evan Shipley A
Ciera Fernandez A
Samantha Hernandez A
Karen Iniguez, PE A
Evan Shipley A
Megan Enright D
Ciera Fernandez A
Evan Shipley A
Alex Ingoglia, TE A
Braulio Ramirez, PE A
Ciera Fernandez A
Samantha Hernandez A
Karen Iniguez, PE A
Jason Reynolds D Samantha Robinson D
Alex Ingoglia, TE A Olga Polunin AIM
Ciera Fernandez A
Alex Ingoglia, TE A
Evan Shipley A
Gabriel Murillo, TE, PE A
Ciera Fernandez A
Felipe Ortega LLG
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III A
Braulio Ramirez, PE A
Evan Shipley A
Felipe Ortega LLG
Felipe Ortega LLG Alex Ingoglia, TE A
Alex Ingoglia, TE A
Gabriel Murillo, TE, PE A
Matt Glasser, PE A
Patrick Jacks A
Senior Advisor
Gabriel Murillo, TE, PE A
T
E
A
M
O
R
G
A
N
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
6.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
T
e
a
m
Th
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
R
a
n
c
h
o
C
u
c
a
m
o
n
g
a
|
R
F
P
#
2
5
/
2
6
-
0
1
0
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
&
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
T
M
S
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
I
28
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III | Project Manager /
Tasks 1 & 8 Lead
Paul Frislie is a Principal ITS Engineer and Project Manager with more than 25 years
of experience delivering traffic engineering and ITS projects for public agencies
throughout California. His expertise includes traffic signal design and coordination,
communications systems, ITS integration, and construction support, with a strong focus
on constructability and operational reliability. As Project Manager, Paul will serve as the
City’s primary point of contact, leading project coordination, schedule management,
and agency collaboration to support efficient delivery and integration with the City’s
traffic signal and ATMS systems. He will lead Project Management, overseeing progress
meetings, stakeholder coordination, and milestone delivery. As Construction Support
Lead, Paul will also provide technical oversight during bidding and construction, including
submittal review, RFI responses, contractor coordination, and system acceptance to
ensure improvements are installed correctly and operate reliably.
Relevant Experience
Design and Construction Support for Traffic Signal System for ATMS Phase 1 | City of
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Paul served as the QA/QC lead for all PS&E package related to the designing traffic signal
modifications and upgrading interconnect systems. He provided field review and conduit
tracing supporting the deployment of new ITS communications infrastructure to improve
traffic signal operations and safety.
Pacific Coast Highway Traffic Signal Synchronization Project | OCTA & City of Newport
Beach, CA
Paul served as Design Task and Construction Support Lead for the upgrade and
integration of a corridor-wide signal communication system along an 11-mile corridor. He
developed PS&E for fiber optic interconnect, CCTV, and DMS infrastructure; upgraded
controllers for Caltrans compatibility; and developed coordinated timing plans. Paul also
supported post-implementation operations and maintenance, ensuring communications
reliability and signal performance.
Euclid Street Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) |
Multiple OC Cities, CA
Paul served as System Design Lead and Interim Project Manager for this multi‑
jurisdictional project synchronizing 67 signals with 69 offsets across six cities. He led
communications system analysis, oversaw engineering and construction management
activities, and supported inspection and implementation. Following deployment, Paul
managed three years of operations and maintenance, ensuring ongoing system reliability,
performance monitoring, and coordination across agencies.
Harbor Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Project | OCTA & City of Santa Ana, CA
Paul served as QA/QC Lead and Construction Manager overseeing system integration
and deployment across 46 intersections. The project included signal synchronization,
equipment upgrades, multi‑period timing implementation, and major Traffic Management
Center upgrades. He supported system fine-tuning and ensured reliable integration with
agency operations.
Education
MBA, University of
Phoenix
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Irvine
Years of Experience
Total - 25 years
With Arcadis - 1.5 years
Licenses/Registration
Civil Engineer (PE), CA
#72982
International Municipal
Signal Association
(IMSA) Traffic Signal Field
Technician Level III, Fiber
Optic Technician, and
Inspector for Advanced
Technologies Certifications
Areas of Expertise
9 Traffic Signal & ITS
Design and Corridor
Coordination
9 Signal Interconnect
and Communications
Systems (Fiber &
Wireless)
9 Traffic Signal Plan
Review, Standards
Compliance & QA/QC
9 Construction Support,
Field Coordination &
System Acceptance
9 Central System
Integration & Traffic
Operations Support
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
29
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Oxnard ITS Master Plan Design & Integration Project | City of Oxnard, CA
Paul led design and integration of an Ethernet-based ITS network supporting approximately 150 intersections. The
project included fiber and wireless communications, controller upgrades, CCTV deployment, video detection upgrades,
and development of a new Traffic Management Center. He supported installation, acceptance testing, and staff training
to ensure reliable system deployment.
Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization Project | OCTA & Multiple Cities, CA
As System Construction Task Lead, Paul oversaw infrastructure upgrades at 45 intersections along an 8-mile corridor.
Improvements included fiber and Ethernet communications, controllers, cabinets, detection, CCTV, EVP, and Bluetooth
travel-time monitoring. He supported corridor retiming and coordinated implementation to maintain system operations
during upgrades.
Yorba Linda Boulevard Regional Signal Synchronization Project | City of Yorba Linda, CA
Paul served as Project Manager overseeing design coordination, signal timing development, and implementation to
improve corridor operations and system reliability.
Lake Forest Traffic Signal Management On-Call Services | City of Lake Forest, CA
Paul provided construction support and technical plan review for traffic signal and ITS projects, including fiber
communication and RTSS corridor improvements. He supported signal modifications, fiber planning, system turn-ons,
and ensured compliance with standards and reliable implementation.
City of Long Beach Mid-City Signal Coordination Project | City of Long Beach, CA
Paul managed signal coordination improvements to enhance traffic flow and operational performance, including design
coordination, implementation support, and performance review.
Citywide Traffic Signal Design & Inventory | City of Manhattan Beach, CA
Paul managed a citywide signal inventory and long-term upgrade plan, and supported design and construction of signal
modifications to improve system reliability and maintainability.
I-405 Improvement Project (Design-Build) | OCTA, CA
Paul served as Transportation Management System Engineer supporting planning and deployment of ITS infrastructure
and temporary systems to maintain traffic operations during construction, coordinating with agencies and corridor
signal improvements.
OCTA Harbor Boulevard Innovative TSP Pilot Study | OCTA, CA
Paul provided lead design support for deployment of advanced detection technologies and safety analytics across 60
signalized intersections along the 12‑mile Harbor Boulevard corridor. The project evaluated innovative Transit Signal
Priority (TSP) solutions to improve bus speed, reliability, and safety across five cities serving more than 10,000 daily
riders. Following the successful study and pilot deployment, Arcadis was recently selected to support the next phase of
corridor-wide TSP expansion.
McFadden Avenue Transit Signal Priority Pilot | City of Santa Ana, CA
As Project Manager, Paul is leading planning and deployment of a cloud‑based Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system
along the McFadden Avenue corridor serving OCTA Route 66 and 19 signalized intersections. The project included
evaluation of five cloud‑based TSP vendors, development of agency requirements, system demonstrations, and
recommendation and procurement of the selected solution. Paul is overseeing controller configuration, signal timing
updates, and corridor deployment in coordination with the City of Santa Ana and OCTA, with ongoing monitoring and
performance evaluation to improve transit reliability while maintaining traffic operations.
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA III | Project Manager / Tasks 1 & 8 Lead
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
30
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Gabriel Murillo, TE | Senior Advisor
Gabriel Murillo has more than 34 years of experience in Intelligent Transportation
Systems (ITS) planning, design, and operations for public agencies nationwide.
His expertise includes traffic signal operations, regional signal timing analysis,
communications systems, detection technologies, and transit signal priority systems.
Gabriel has extensive Traffic Management Center experience, where he managed daily
operations and traffic optimization strategies supported by more than 20,000 detection
devices. He has overseen operations for over 2,500 signalized intersections and led the
deployment of Adaptive Traffic Control Systems across more than 1,500 intersections.
As Senior Advisor, Gabriel will provide strategic guidance on ATMS architecture, signal
timing strategies, and system integration to support reliable and efficient corridor
operations.
Relevant Experience
Design and Construction Support for Traffic Signal System for ATMS Phase 1 | City of
Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Gabriel served as Technical Advisor for the communication
system design during the PS&E development to provide support for the high-level
communication system design. He provided design review and system architecture
analysis supporting the deployment of new ITS communications infrastructure to improve
traffic signal operations and safety.
San Bernardino Valley (SBV) Coordinated Traffic Signal System (TSS) San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), San Bernardino County, CA: Gabriel served
as the Technical Advisor for a $4 million project assisting 16 local agencies in the San
Bernardino Valley (SBV) to improve traffic progression. He led the development of
signal coordination master plans for five sub-regions, updated coordination timings for
over 400 traffic signals, and conducted semi-annual assessments to ensure optimal
performance. Gabriel also provided system support services to resolve technical issues
and helped implement ITS improvements along Haven Avenue in Ontario and Rancho
Cucamonga, including center-to-center communications between the cities and Caltrans.
Katella Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Project, OCTA, Orange County,
CA: Gabriel served as the Project Manager for the Design‑Build project that provided
operational improvements along the 17-mile Katella Avenue corridor, spanning the City of
Los Alamitos, Cypress, Stanton, Garden Grove, Anaheim, County of Orange, and Caltrans
jurisdiction. The project included multimodal enhancements, such as bicycle detection to
improve operations for cyclists, the installation of new fiber optic cable throughout the
corridor, and the development of a new Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) in
the City of Los Alamitos. Additionally, the project provided new high‑definition (HD) CCTV
surveillance cameras, upgraded ATC traffic controllers at all intersections, and optimized
traffic signal timing across the entire corridor.
Education
MBA, University of
California, Irvine
BS, Electrical Engineering,
Marymount University, Los
Angeles
Years of Experience
Total - 35 years
With Arcadis - 3 years
Licenses/Registration
Traffic Engineer, CA, #1843
Areas of Expertise
9 Traffic Signal
Operations &
Performance
Optimization
9 Regional Signal
Coordination &
Synchronization
9 Advanced Traffic
Management Systems
(ATMS)
9 Traffic Management
Center (TMC)
Operations
9 ITS Systems
Engineering,
Communications &
Detection
9 Adaptive Traffic Control
Systems
9 Technical Advisory &
Program Oversight
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
31
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) TSS Project, City of Newport Beach, CA: Gabriel served as Project Manager for the
Design‑Build project aimed at delivering operational improvements along the 12‑mile PCH corridor within Caltrans right‑
of‑way and the City of Newport Beach. The project implemented multimodal enhancements, including bicycle detection
to improve operations for cyclists, as well as the installation of new fiber optic cable throughout the corridor with a
two-gigabit backbone supporting separate networks for the City and the State. Additional improvements included: Five
new high‑definition (HD) CCTV surveillance cameras for enhanced traffic monitoring; Upgraded ATC traffic controllers
at all intersections; Optimized traffic signal timing across the entire corridor; Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) at the north
end of the corridor to improve motorist communication, particularly during the summer peak season when beach traffic
increases. This corridor presented unique challenges due to seasonal traffic fluctuations, requiring a strategic approach
to system integration and optimization.
Brookhurst Street TSS Project, OCTA, Orange County, CA: Gabriel served as the Integration Lead for the Design-Build
project that provided operational improvements along the Brookhurst corridor spanning the cities of Anaheim, Garden
Grove, Westminster, Fountain Valley, and Huntington Beach. The project included multimodal enhancements, such as
bicycle detection to improve operations for cyclists, the installation of new fiber optic cable throughout the corridor,
and a two ‑gigabit backbone to support the system. The project also included the installation of new high‑definition (HD)
CCTV surveillance cameras, upgraded ATC traffic controllers at all intersections, and optimized traffic signal timing
across the entire corridor.
La Palma TSS Project, City of Anaheim, CA: Gabriel served as the Deputy Project Manager for this Design‑Build project,
which aimed to enhance operational efficiency along the 12‑mile La Palma corridor in the City of Anaheim. The project
incorporated multimodal improvements, including bicycle detection to improve cyclist operations, the installation of
new fiber optic cable throughout the corridor, and a redundant gigabit backbone to strengthen network reliability.
Additionally, the project implemented eight high‑definition (HD) CCTV surveillance cameras, upgraded ATC traffic
controllers at all intersections, and optimized traffic signal timing across the entire corridor. A segment of the corridor
was also designed to incorporate adaptive traffic operations, further enhancing real-time traffic flow and efficiency.
Orangewood TSS Project, City of Anaheim, CA: Gabriel served as the Deputy Project Manager for this Design‑Build
project, which provided operational improvements along the four‑mile Orangewood corridor in the City of Anaheim and
City of Orange, including two Caltrans ramp intersections. The project incorporated multimodal enhancements, such
as bicycle detection to improve cyclist operations, the installation of new fiber optic cable throughout the corridor, and
a wireless network within the City of Orange. In addition, eight high‑definition (HD) CCTV surveillance cameras were
installed to enhance traffic monitoring, and all intersections were upgraded with ATC traffic controllers. The project also
optimized traffic signal timing throughout the corridor, including a segment designed for adaptive traffic operations to
improve real-time traffic flow. By integrating advanced traffic management technologies and multimodal infrastructure,
this project significantly enhanced corridor efficiency and mobility.
Citywide ITS Support Services, City of Fountain Valley, CA: Gabriel is currently serving as the Systems Engineering
and Integration Lead for the installation of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements throughout the City of
Fountain Valley and its Traffic Management Center (TMC). He has played a key role in designing and integrating the
city's transportation system over the past 16 years, and as part of this project, he is providing system management
services to support ongoing upgrades while maintaining seamless operations and enhancing overall system capabilities.
This initiative is part of a sole‑source project awarded to oversee the operations and modernization of the City’s
transportation and ITS infrastructure. Gabriel's expertise ensures that system enhancements align with operational
needs, optimizing performance and future scalability.
Harbor Boulevard Pilot Innovative Transit Signal Priority Study, OCTA, Orange County, CA: Arcadis supported OCTA
in evaluating innovative Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and multimodal detection technologies along the 12‑mile Harbor
Boulevard corridor serving more than 10,000 daily bus riders across five cities. The project included analysis of 60
signalized intersections and development of a corridor-wide TSP conceptual plan to improve bus speed and reliability.
Arcadis led project management and technical analysis, including corridor operations assessment and proof‑of‑concept
TSP deployment in the City of Fullerton. Based on the success of the study and pilot, Arcadis was recently selected by
OCTA to support the next phase of corridor-wide TSP expansion.
Gabriel Murillo, TE | Senior Advisor
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
32
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Evan Shipley | Tasks 2 & 4 Lead
Evan Shipley is a Traffic Engineer at Arcadis with eight years of experience supporting
traffic engineering, traffic signal operations, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
projects for public agencies throughout Southern California. His expertise includes traffic
data collection and analysis, signal timing evaluation, corridor operational assessment,
and Synchro network development to support data‑driven traffic operations.
Evan has supported numerous Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP)
projects, assisting with turning movement count analysis, traffic modeling, and corridor
performance evaluation. For this project, Evan will lead Task 2 ‑ Agency Coordination
and Task 4 - Preliminary Investigations, coordinating with City staff and partner agencies
while supporting field data collection, corridor analysis, and development of technical
inputs that inform project design and signal timing improvements.
Relevant Experience
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) – Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive
| City of Orange, CA (Multiple Orange County Cities)
Evan served as Project Engineer supporting signal coordination and timing improvements
along the Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive corridor spanning 54 signalized intersections
across six cities and Caltrans facilities. His responsibilities include analyzing turning
movement counts, supporting signal timing plan development, and preparing before-
and‑after corridor analysis to quantify operational improvements. The project includes
infrastructure upgrades, coordination timing development, and performance evaluation.
Euclid Street Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) | City
of La Habra, CA (Multiple Orange County Cities)
Evan served as Project Engineer supporting synchronization of 67 traffic signals and 69
offset signals across multiple jurisdictions. His role includes assisting with signal timing
analysis, supporting communication system evaluations, and contributing to operational
performance assessments. The project includes multi‑year operations and maintenance
services supporting ongoing signal system monitoring.
San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) | San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), San Bernardino County, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer, assisting with traffic signal cabinet inventories,
generation of basic timing parameters, Synchro network development, and analysis of
turning movement counts to support corridor-level signal coordination across multiple
regional corridors.
Von Karman Avenue / Tustin Ranch Road RTSSP | City of Irvine, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer on this multi‑jurisdictional signal synchronization project
involving 30 signalized intersections, including Caltrans crossings. His work included
generating coordinated timing plans, calculating bicycle minimum green times, assisting
with timing implementation and fine-tuning, and preparing before-and-after studies to
demonstrate corridor performance improvements.
MacArthur Boulevard Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) | City
of Irvine, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer, supporting generation of basic timing parameters,
development of Synchro networks, and coordination of before-study data collection.
The project includes retiming of 23 signalized intersections and traffic signal equipment
upgrades across multiple jurisdictions.
Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Irvine
Years of Experience
Total - 8 years
With Arcadis - <1 year
Areas of Expertise
9 Traffic Data Collection
& Turning Movement
Analysis
9 Existing Conditions &
Corridor Operations
Evaluation
9 Traffic Modeling &
Synchro Network
Development
9 Level of Service (LOS)
& Operational Analysis
9 Signal Timing
Performance
Assessment
9 Before-and-After
Operational Studies
9 Agency Coordination &
Technical Support
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
33
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Marguerite Parkway Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) | City of Mission Viejo, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer supporting traffic signal synchronization and timing upgrades along Marguerite
Parkway. His responsibilities included participating in timing implementation and fine-tuning, responding to resident
feedback related to corridor performance, and preparing before‑and‑after comparison studies and final project reports
documenting operational improvements.
Tweedy Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Project | City of South Gate, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer, supporting traffic signal timing field work and development of synchronized
timing plans along the Tweedy Boulevard corridor. The project included analysis of operational conditions, design of
communications infrastructure, and timing optimization to improve corridor performance and safety.
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) – Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project | Orange
County, CA
Evan served as Support Staff on this countywide initiative to realign signal timing for more than 2,500 intersections. His
work supports data-driven performance assessment, signal timing optimization, and documentation of network-wide
operational conditions, contributing to improved efficiency and consistency across the regional signal system.
Barranca / Muirlands Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (O&M) | Cities of Irvine, Mission Viejo, Lake
Forest, and Caltrans
Evan supported the operations and maintenance phase of this regional corridor project, assisting with performance
monitoring, coordination of data collection activities, and timing updates to address operational concerns and resident
feedback.
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services – Trabuco Road Signal Synchronization (O&M) | Cities of Lake Forest and
Mission Viejo, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer supporting monthly operational monitoring and performance assessments. He
prepared recurring O&M observation reports documenting corridor performance and contributed to final operational
reporting.
Burbank Traffic Responsive Signal System Project | City of Burbank, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer supporting retiming of 63 signalized intersections. His responsibilities included
developing Synchro base maps, generating timing parameters, collecting field data, and conducting before-condition
studies to support evaluation of traffic-responsive operations.
Traffic Management Center (TMC) Staffing Event Management– City of Pasadena, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer on this Traffic Management Center Staffing project for the City of Pasadena to act as
an extension of City Staff to manage traffic during events in the city and at the Rose Bowl. His responsibilities included
the remote monitoring of traffic via live video feeds, on-the-fly changes to signal timing in response to live demand,
and coordination with the Pasadena Police Department to adjust timing based on their observations. He also prepared
staffing reports to summarize the changes made during the staffing shift and offer recommendations to improve signal
timing for future events.
Traffic Management Center (TMC) Staffing Event Management– City of Santa Monica, CA
Evan served as Project Engineer on this TMC project for the City of Santa Monica. His previous firm was contracted to
serve as an extension of the City’s MC staff during the summer and winter months. The goal of the project was to bring
together all participants involved in managing traffic during large influxes in and out of the City. Evan provided field staff
support.
Evan Shipley | Tasks 2 & 4 Lead
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
34
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Alex Ingoglia, TE | Tasks 3, 7, and 10 Lead
Alex Ingoglia is a Traffic Signal Operations Engineer at Arcadis with more than eight years
of experience supporting municipal traffic signal operations, signal timing coordination,
and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation for public agencies
throughout Southern California. His expertise includes signal system monitoring, signal
timing optimization, corridor synchronization, and communications troubleshooting to
support reliable traffic signal operations.
Alex has supported numerous Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP)
projects and signal operations contracts, providing hands‑on support for traffic data
review, signal timing development, Synchro modeling, field implementation, and
operational performance assessment. For this project, Alex will lead Task 3 ‑ Existing
Conditions Signal Evaluation, Task 7 - Signal Timing Sheets, and Task 10 - Performance
Monitoring and Reporting, supporting corridor analysis, preparation of new timing plans,
and evaluation of post-implementation operational improvements.
Relevant Experience
Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project | OCTA Orange County, CA
This large-scale signal timing optimization effort encompasses over 2,500 signalized
intersections countywide. Arcadis’ scope includes approximately 450 intersections in
South Orange County, extending from Mission Viejo to the county line in San Clemente.
Arcadis is developing a modern approach to signal timing analysis, optimization, and
ongoing operations and maintenance by leveraging probe-based traffic data, probe safety
data, and innovative AI algorithms developed by Arcadis engineers. As Project Engineer,
Alex is assisting with signal timing development and optimization activities.
Tustin Avenue – Rose Drive Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) |
City of Orange, CA (Multiple Cities)
Alex served as Project Engineer, assisting with signal timing efforts across 54 signalized
intersections spanning six cities and Caltrans facilities. His responsibilities included
developing Synchro models and proposed timing updates to support corridor-wide
coordination improvements. He also supported the installation of communication devices
and integration efforts.
Culver Drive / Bonita Canyon Drive / Ford Road RTSSP | City of Irvine, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer, assisting with development of optimized signal timing
plans and leading implementation of new coordination timing. He also supported
preparation of before-condition operational analysis to support evaluation of corridor
performance improvements.
Euclid Street Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) | City
of La Habra, CA (Multiple Orange County Cities)
Alex served as Project Engineer supporting synchronization of 67 traffic signals and 69
offset signals across multiple cities along the Euclid Street corridor. His role includes
assisting with signal timing development and implementation, supporting communication
system analysis for select cities, and providing assistance with engineering, construction
support, inspection, and administrative tasks. Following implementation, the project
includes multi-year operations and maintenance services.
Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
Years of Experience
Total - 8 years
With Arcadis - <1 year
Licenses/Registration
Traffic Engineer, CA, #3121
Areas of Expertise
9 Traffic Signal
Operations & System
Monitoring
9 Signal Timing
& Corridor
Synchronization
9 Signal Timing Sheets
Development
9 Synchro Modeling &
Signal Timing Analysis
9 Centracs ATMS
Operations &
Diagnostics
9 Traffic Signal
Communications
Troubleshooting
9 Performance
Monitoring &
Operational Reporting
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
35
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) | San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA), San Bernardino County, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer, assisting with semi‑annual operational assessments, Synchro network development,
and basic signal timing analysis for a regional program supporting more than 500 traffic signals. He also supported
system monitoring and troubleshooting for signals experiencing communication outages, directly aligning with proactive
operations and monitoring responsibilities.
Kraemer Boulevard / Glassell Street / Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
(RTSSP) | City of Santa Ana, Orange County, CA
Alex is currently serving as a Project Engineer for this multi‑jurisdictional RTSSP corridor spanning approximately 15
miles and 61 signalized intersections across the cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Placentia, and Brea, including
Caltrans facilities. The project includes PS&E development, ITS communication upgrades, ATC controller deployment,
system integration, construction management, and coordination with OCTA and the Countywide Baseline Project to
support corridor‑wide signal synchronization. Alex is assisting with equipment procurement, network integration, and
construction support.
McFadden Avenue Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Pilot | City of Santa Ana, CA
Alex is serving as a Project Engineer, supporting planning, evaluation, and concept design for a cloud‑based TSP
system to improve transit travel time and reliability. The project includes needs assessment, vendor demonstrations,
and concept plan development, and is currently moving through procurement, deployment, and evaluation in
coordination with OCTA and the City. Alex is supporting development of new TSP timing and optimized signal timing.
Traffic and Intelligent Transportation Systems Engineering Services – Katella Avenue | Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer, supporting timing implementation and field fine‑tuning through direct field work and
Traffic Management Center (TMC) operations. He also assisted with installation of communication equipment at project
intersections to support reliable controller connectivity. The project focused on deploying ITS equipment, optimizing
coordination timing plans, and improving operational performance for all roadway users.
Lake Forest Traffic Signal Management On-Call Services | City of Lake Forest, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer providing day‑to ‑day traffic signal operations support for the City of Lake Forest.
Responsibilities include monitoring traffic signal operations and communications, investigating City staff and resident
concerns related to signal timing, and implementing timing adjustments in response to construction activities and
changing traffic conditions. This role provides direct, hands-on experience with municipal signal system operations and
responsiveness.
Laguna Woods Traffic Engineering Services | City of Laguna Woods, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer supporting ongoing traffic signal operations and monitoring using the Econolite
Centracs system. Responsibilities include responding to resident complaints, recommending operational improvements,
coordinating with regional agencies on signal priority projects, and supporting special operational needs within the City.
Irvine Center Drive – Edinger Avenue RTSSP (O&M) | Cities of Irvine and Tustin, CA
Alex served as Project Manager for operations and maintenance support, assisting with ongoing monitoring and
operational needs for the coordinated corridor.
On-Call Traffic Signal Operations & ITS Engineering Services | City of San Marcos, CA
Alex served as Project Engineer, diagnosing communication issues and supporting traffic signal operations, ITS
hardware functionality, and Traffic Management Center systems. His work included restoring communication to signal
controllers, repairing CCTV equipment, and maintaining overall system functionality.
Pasadena Traffic Management Center (TMC) Staffing for Special Events | City of Pasadena, CA
Alex supported Traffic Management Center operations for major special events, including the Rose Parade and Rose
Bowl. His role included managing multiple central signal systems, implementing live timing changes based on CCTV
observations, and coordinating with police and field staff to respond to real-time traffic conditions.
Alex Ingoglia, TE | Tasks 3, 7, and 10 Lead
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
36
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Braulio Ramirez, PE | Task 6 Lead
Braulio Ramirez is a Principal ITS Engineer and Project Manager at Arcadis with more
than 22 years of experience delivering traffic signal operations, coordination, and
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects for public agencies throughout Southern
California. His expertise includes traffic signal design, signal timing and synchronization,
communications systems, ATMS integration, and construction support.
Braulio has served as Project Manager and technical lead for numerous Regional Traffic
Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) and ITS corridor projects, overseeing system
inventories, infrastructure upgrades, signal timing development, and multi-agency
coordination. For this project, Braulio will lead Task 6 – PS&E Development, overseeing
preparation of traffic signal plans, specifications, and cost estimates, supporting
signal timing sheet development, and coordinating with the project team to ensure
design solutions are constructible and compatible with the City’s existing signal and
communications infrastructure.
Relevant Experience
Professional Design and Construction Support for Traffic Signal System for ATMS | City
of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Braulio served as Project Manager, preparing coordination timing plans, designing traffic
signal modifications, and upgrading interconnect systems. He provided construction
support and integration services, supporting deployment of new ITS communications
infrastructure and optimized coordination timing plans to improve traffic signal operations
and safety.
Kraemer Boulevard / Glassell Street / Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Project (RTSSP) | City of Santa Ana, Orange County, CA
Braulio is currently serving as Project Manager for this multi‑jurisdictional RTSSP
corridor spanning approximately 15 miles and 61 signalized intersections across the
cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Placentia, and Brea, including Caltrans facilities.
The project includes PS&E development, ITS communication upgrades, ATC controller
deployment, system integration, construction management, and coordination with OCTA
and the Countywide Baseline Project to support corridor‑wide signal synchronization.
Brookhurst Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (RTSSP) | Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA
Braulio served as Project Manager for traffic signal and ITS equipment upgrades and
corridor-wide signal synchronization along Brookhurst Street, covering 59 signalized
intersections across multiple cities. Responsibilities included managing controller,
cabinet, communications, EVP, and CCTV upgrades, coordinating fiber-optic installations
to close communication gaps, and overseeing integration to support reliable, coordinated
signal operations.
Traffic and Intelligent Transportation Systems Engineering Services – Main Street
RTSSP | Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA
Braulio served as the Design, Integration, and Construction Support Lead for upgrading
traffic signal electronics and communications equipment and optimizing signal timing
along Main Street, a major north‑south corridor with 67 signalized intersections. The
project focused on deploying new ITS equipment and communication infrastructure to
enhance traffic signal operations and implementing optimized coordination timing plans
to improve traffic flow and safety for all users.
Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
Years of Experience
Total - 22 years
With Arcadis - 2 years
Licenses/Registration
Civil Engineer (PE), CA
#85189
Areas of Expertise
9 Traffic Signal & ITS
Design (PS&E)
9 Traffic Signal
Coordination &
Synchronization
(RTSSP)
9 Signal Timing
Development &
Optimization
9 Advanced Traffic
Management Systems
(ATMS / Centracs)
9 Signal Communications
Networks (Fiber &
Wireless)
9 Signal System
Integration &
Acceptance Testing
9 Traffic Signal Plan
Review & Construction
Support
37The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project TeamDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) – Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive | City of Orange, CA
This project included traffic signal infrastructure upgrades, signal coordination, and timing improvements for 54
signalized intersections across six cities and Caltrans facilities. Work included development of signal timing plans,
vehicle turning movement counts, and before-and-after corridor analysis to evaluate operational performance
improvements.
San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) | San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA), San Bernardino County, CA
As Project Engineer, Braulio led ITS design efforts for corridor‑wide signal system improvements, including center‑to‑
center communications between cities and Caltrans. He prepared design plans, supported equipment procurement, and
provided construction support to implement coordinated signal operations.
MacArthur Boulevard RTSSP | City of Irvine, CA
As Task Leader for Construction Support, Braulio supported signal timing updates and safety-related clearance
improvements while assisting with contractor submittals, RFIs, and schedule compliance during construction.
Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) | Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA),
Orange County, CA
Braulio served as Design and Construction Support Lead, coordinating ITS equipment upgrades, signal timing
improvements, and stakeholder needs across 45 signalized intersections to support regional synchronization.
Katella Avenue Traffic Light Synchronization Project (TLSP) | Orange County, CA
As Project Engineer, Braulio designed and implemented signal synchronization and equipment upgrades for 68 traffic
signals across nine agencies, including development of timing plans for multiple peak periods and communication
upgrades.
Harbor Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) | City of Santa Ana, CA
Braulio served as Design and Construction Support Task Lead, providing construction management support and
coordination among multiple agencies along the corridor.
Hamner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) | City of Eastvale, CA
As Lead Engineer, Braulio provided traffic/ITS design services including fiber-optic communication design, video
detection upgrades, and development of coordinated signal timing plans.
ITS Master Plan | City of Santa Ana, CA
As Project Manager, Braulio assisted with development of the City’s ITS Master Plan, including network design,
fiber management, data analytics, traffic signal controllers, CCTV, and related infrastructure. The team field-verified
305 signalized intersections, inventoried controller cabinet and pole‑mounted equipment, and developed GIS and
spreadsheet-based documentation to support system monitoring, maintenance planning, and future upgrades.
Alternative Signal Communication Demonstration Project | Orange County, CA
Braulio served as Project Manager for this pilot project focused on improving traffic signal communication reliability and
redundancy across multiple Orange County cities. Responsibilities included testing existing interconnect systems (fiber,
copper, wireless), procuring and configuring communication equipment, and deploying solutions to bring offline or
outdated intersections back online.
Fountain Valley Citywide Fiber Optic Maintenance and Support | City of Fountain Valley, CA
As Project Engineer, Braulio was responsible for operation, maintenance, and monitoring of the City’s fiber optic
and communication infrastructure supporting traffic signals and multiple City departments. His team responded to
communication failures and deficiencies, provided diagnostic and troubleshooting support, and met strict response
timelines for critical system issues—experience directly applicable to ongoing signal system monitoring.
Braulio Ramirez, PE | Task 6 Lead
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
38
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Jason Reynolds | Task 5 Lead
Jason Reynolds is Dudek’s Transportation Practice Director and a Senior CEQA/NEPA
Project Manager with more than 31 years of experience supporting environmental
compliance for transportation infrastructure projects. His expertise includes
environmental review and regulatory coordination for traffic signal upgrades, ITS
deployments, corridor operations improvements, and safety enhancement programs.
Jason has extensive experience preparing Preliminary Environmental Studies, CEQA
exemptions, and NEPA categorical exclusions for signal and intersection improvement
projects, including those requiring coordination with Caltrans and other regulatory
agencies.
For this project, Jason will lead Task 5 ‑ Environmental Compliance, overseeing
environmental documentation, regulatory coordination, and agency approvals needed to
support project design and implementation. His experience navigating state and federal
environmental processes helps streamline approvals and minimize project delivery risk.
Relevant Experience
Region-Wide Traffic Signal Synchronization Program | Coachella Valley Association of
Governments, CA
Jason serves as Project Director and Environmental Manager for the region‑wide
traffic signal synchronization program, supporting environmental clearance for multiple
corridor improvements. The project includes preparation of Preliminary Environmental
Studies (PES), CEQA categorical exemptions, and NEPA categorical exclusions. Jason
leads coordination with Caltrans and local agencies to streamline approvals and support
implementation of signal and ITS improvements.
HSIP Cycle 9 Traffic Signal Upgrades | City of Oceanside, CA
Jason served as Project Director for environmental clearance of traffic signal and safety
improvements at 93 intersections citywide. He oversaw preparation of the PES and
CEQA/NEPA categorical approvals and coordinated with Caltrans Local Assistance to
secure approvals with no iterative review cycles.
HSIP Cycle 9 Traffic Signal Upgrades | City of Cathedral City, CA
Jason served as Project Director managing environmental documentation and regulatory
coordination for intersection safety improvements across multiple corridors. He oversaw
preparation of the PES and CEQA/NEPA approvals and coordinated with Caltrans and
tribal agencies to support project delivery.
Manhattan Beach Boulevard & Peck Avenue Intelligent Traffic Signal Improvements |
City of Manhattan Beach, CA
Jason served as Project Director providing environmental oversight for traffic signal and
ITS improvements at a key intersection. He supported preparation of the PES and CEQA/
NEPA approvals and coordinated with Caltrans and City staff to advance the project
toward implementation.
Interstate 210 Soundwall Improvements | City of La Cañada Flintridge, CA
Jason served as Environmental Manager overseeing environmental documentation and
regulatory coordination for multiple soundwall improvement phases along Interstate 210.
He coordinated with Caltrans and resource agencies to secure environmental approvals
and provide compliance support during construction.
Education
BS, City and Regional
Planning, California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis
Obispo
Years of Experience
Total - 31 years
With Dudek - 6 years
Areas of Expertise
9 CEQA / NEPA
Environmental
Documentation
9 Transportation & ITS
Project Environmental
Compliance
9 Preliminary
Environmental Studies
(PES)
9 Caltrans Local
Assistance &
Regulatory
Coordination
9 Categorical Exemptions
/ Categorical Exclusions
9 Agency Coordination
& Environmental
Approvals
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
39
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Felipe Ortega | Task 9 Lead
Felipe Ortega is a Senior Signal Systems Specialist at Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG)
with extensive experience supporting traffic signal system integration, communications
infrastructure, and Traffic Management Center (TMC) operations for agencies throughout
Southern California. His expertise includes configuration and integration of traffic signal
controllers, central signal systems, and communications networks supporting Advanced
Traffic Management Systems (ATMS).
Felipe regularly supports agencies with system deployment, controller integration,
communications troubleshooting, and field implementation of signal and ITS
infrastructure. He also provides training and technical guidance to agency engineering
and maintenance staff on the use of traffic signal hardware, central system software,
and TMC equipment. For this project, Felipe will lead Task 9 ‑ Central Management
System and Integration, overseeing configuration, testing, and integration of traffic signal
controllers and communications systems to ensure reliable operation within the City’s
ATMS environment.
Relevant Experience
On-Call ITS Support Services | Multiple Southern California Cities
Felipe provides ongoing ITS and signal system integration support for numerous
municipalities including Rancho Cucamonga, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach,
Westminster, and others. His responsibilities include troubleshooting communications
networks, integrating signal controllers, and supporting central system operations.
Antonio Parkway Multi-Agency Signal Interconnect Project | Orange County, CA
Felipe led system integration and signal timing implementation for a multi-agency
corridor project interconnecting 26 signals across City, County, and Caltrans jurisdictions.
His work included communications system configuration, timing implementation, and
integration with the Orange County Traffic Management Center to support coordinated
signal operations.
SBCTA Tier 1 & Tier 2 Traffic Signal Synchronization Project | San Bernardino County, CA
Felipe served as Signal Systems Specialist and integrator for this regional signal
synchronization program covering 652 intersections. His responsibilities included
interconnect design support, central system installation, timing implementation, and
system monitoring across multiple jurisdictions.
Orange County RTSSP Corridor Projects | Multiple Cities, CA
Felipe supported system integration, signal timing implementation, and communications
upgrades for numerous RTSSP corridors across Orange County cities including Costa
Mesa, Fullerton, La Habra, Brea, and others. His work included controller upgrades,
Ethernet network integration, and central system connectivity.
Signal Interconnect Improvements and Coordination Timing | City of Indio, CA
Felipe assisted with preparation of communications plans and led system integration and
timing implementation for corridor signal synchronization improvements.
Traffic Signal & Street Improvements – Azusa Canyon Rd. & Nubia St. | City of Irwindale, CA
Felipe supported signal timing sheet preparation, timing implementation, and signal
turn-on activities while assisting with monitoring and fine-tuning of corridor coordination
timing.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
6. Project Team
40
Years of Experience
Total - 30 years
With LLG - 5.5 years
Licenses/Registration
IMSA Transportation
Center System Specialist -
Level I – CE _102877
IMSA Traffic Signal Senior
Field Technician - Level III
– CE_102877
Areas of Expertise
9 Central Traffic Signal
System Integration
9 Traffic Signal
Communications
Networks (Fiber &
Wireless)
9 Traffic Management
Center (TMC) Systems
9 ATMS Software
Platforms (Centracs,
QuicNet, Tactics,
Intelight, Transuite)
9 Traffic Signal Controller
Configuration &
Integration
9 Signal Timing
Implementation & Field
Fine-Tuning
9 ITS Hardware
Deployment &
Communications
Troubleshooting
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
7
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
42
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following page presents the proposed project schedule for competing each task in the RFP. Per the RFP, the
contract documents and any necessary permits need to be completed within 18 months of NTP. Per our proposed
schedule, the PS&E and permit process is planned to be completed within 12 months. The schedule reflects not only our
understanding of required activities, but also our extensive experience working with Caltrans, local agencies, equipment
vendors, and contractors on similar projects within Southern California.
It is known that working with Caltrans and obtaining an encroachment permit can delay any project. Early coordination
with Caltrans will be key to keep the design ahead of schedule. There are multiple ways to expedite the project schedule:
• Submit design early related to Caltrans ROW at Archibald, Milliken and Day Creek. Quick coordination with field staff
will be key to display intent to Caltrans for permit approval.
• Procure equipment separately from Contractor either by City or Consultant. This will allow for savings in the budget but
will advance the overall schedule.
• Procure and install controllers early in the schedule to allow for new timing implementation and fine tuning.
The schedule, individual tasks, and equipment and construction progress will be monitored in real time using Arcadis’s
Project Management Dashboard as described in Task 1 of the Scope of Work. This will allow for all the project
stakeholders to get up-to-date information on the schedule.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
7. Project ScheduleDocusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Task 1: Project Management 382 days?Wed 7/1/26 Thu 12/16/27
2 NTP Wed 7/1/26
3 Kick-Off Meeting Tue 7/7/26
4 Monthly Meetings 371 days Thu 7/16/26 Thu 12/16/27
23 30% Review Meeting 1 day Wed 12/2/26 Wed 12/2/26
24 60% Review Meeting 1 day Tue 3/9/27 Tue 3/9/27
25 90% Review Meeting 1 day Tue 5/4/27 Tue 5/4/27
26 Task 2: Agency Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
27 Caltrans Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
28 Caltrans Review Meeting 1 1 day Wed 12/9/26 Wed 12/9/26
29 Caltrans Review Meeting 2 1 day Wed 3/17/27 Wed 3/17/27
30 Agency Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
31 Task 3: Existing Conditions Signal Evaluation 94 days Tue 9/15/26 Fri 1/22/27
32 Counts 3 days Tue 9/15/26 Thu 9/17/26
33 Before Studies 3 days Tue 9/15/26 Thu 9/17/26
34 Synchro Analysis 54 days Mon 9/21/26 Thu 12/3/26
35 Draft Summary Report 1 day Fri 12/4/26 Fri 12/4/26
36 City Review 25 days Mon 12/7/26 Fri 1/8/27
37 Revise Report 9 days Mon 1/11/27 Thu 1/21/27
38 Final Summary Report 1 day Fri 1/22/27 Fri 1/22/27
39 Task 4: Preliminary Investigations 140 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 1/15/27
40 As-Builts/Data Collections 5 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 7/10/26
41 Field Review 10 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/24/26
42 Utilitiy Coordination 140 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 1/15/27
43 Base Maps 20 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/7/26
44 Task 5: Environmental Compliance 170 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 2/26/27
45 Compliance Forms and Approvals 170 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 2/26/27
46 Task 6: Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E)209 days Mon 8/10/26 Thu 5/27/27
47 30% Plans & Estimates 55 days Mon 8/10/26 Fri 10/23/26
48 City Review 23 days Mon 10/26/26 Wed 11/25/26
49 Caltrans Review 23 days Mon 10/26/26 Wed 11/25/26
50 60% Plans & Estimates 40 days Mon 11/30/26 Fri 1/22/27
51 City Review 30 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/5/27
52 Caltrans Review 30 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/5/27
53 90% Plans & Estimates 25 days Mon 3/8/27 Fri 4/9/27
54 City Review 15 days Mon 4/12/27 Fri 4/30/27
55 Caltrans Review 15 days Mon 4/12/27 Fri 4/30/27
56 Final Plans & Estimates 15 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 5/21/27
57 90% Specifications 15 days Mon 3/22/27 Fri 4/9/27
58 Final Specifications 15 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 5/21/27
59 Final PS&E Package Submittal 3 days Tue 5/25/27 Thu 5/27/27
60 Task 7: Signal Timing Sheets 50 days?Mon 1/25/27 Fri 4/2/27
61 Timing Sheet Development 29 days Mon 1/25/27 Thu 3/4/27
62 Draft Submittal 1 day?Fri 3/5/27 Fri 3/5/27
63 City Review 15 days Mon 3/8/27 Fri 3/26/27
64 Revise Timing Sheets 4 days Mon 3/29/27 Thu 4/1/27
65 Final Submittal 1 day Fri 4/2/27 Fri 4/2/27
66 Task 8: Construction Support 189 days?Tue 6/1/27 Fri 2/18/28
67 Bid Support 60 days Tue 6/1/27 Mon 8/23/27
68 Pre-Construction Meeting Wed 8/25/27
69 Construction Support 120 days Mon 8/30/27 Fri 2/11/28
70 Final As-Builts 5 days Mon 2/14/28 Fri 2/18/28
71 Task 9: Central Management System and Integration 40 days Mon 1/3/28 Fri 2/25/28
72 Integration 20 days Mon 1/3/28 Fri 1/28/28
73 Timing Implementation 10 days Mon 2/7/28 Fri 2/18/28
74 Fine Tuning 5 days Mon 2/21/28 Fri 2/25/28
75 Task 10: Performance Monitoring and Reporting (12 Months)262 days Mon 3/6/28 Tue 3/6/29
7/1
7/7
12/2
3/9
5/4
12/9
3/17
12/4
1/22
5/27
3/5
4/2
8/25
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MarQtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Qtr 1, 2027 Qtr 2, 2027 Qtr 3, 2027 Qtr 4, 2027 Qtr 1, 2028
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
Page 1
Project: RCP3_Schedule_030526Date: Mon 3/9/26
7. Project Schedule
43The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
18401 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
www.arcadis.com
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 21 of 29
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT”
It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such
conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for
Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Vendors.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to
the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010 for Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced
Traffic Management System Phase III.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any
RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not
limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP
response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and
agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Vendors)
_______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Ramin Massoumi, PE
March 17, 2026
N/A
Interim Global President, Mobility
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 22 of 29
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”
Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Vendors accept the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Vendors propose exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as
“Exception Summary”, which shall include the Vendors’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each
exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the
submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Ramin Massoumi, PE
Interim Global President, Mobility
March 17, 2026
X
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 23 of 29
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________
(President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative)
of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the
(Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional
Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010 for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III have been
read and understood and that our Vendors is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA.
Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for
immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the
contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Interim Global President, MobilityRamin Massoumi, PE
Ramin Massoumi, PE
March 17, 2026
Interim Global President, Mobility
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 24 of 29
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Vendors hereby acknowledge the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Vendors understand failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered
non-responsive. It is the Vendors’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number
of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Ramin Massoumi, PE
Interim Global President, Mobility
March 17, 2026
Addendum No. 001 - March 5, 2026
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 25 of 29
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT and SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”
I certify that neither _____________________________ (Vendor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are
not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in
accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986
Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed
subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Vendors or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or
debarment by a local, state, or federal government entity, or if Vendors or any of its subcontractors
subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
Ramin Massoumi, PE
Interim Global President, Mobility
March 17, 2026
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 26 of 29
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may
utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of
_______ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner
or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of
such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of
its own order placement and payments of the Vendors.
Successful Vendors will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please
specify.
YES, _________ NO, _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
X
1,095
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 27 of 29
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and
conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO
MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids
system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Arcadis U.S., Inc.
18401 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Interim Global President, Mobility
www.arcadis.com
March 17, 2026
562.221.2118
N/A
ramin.massoumi@arcadis.com
Ramin Massoumi, PE
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28 of 29
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 28 of 29
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum
of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted
comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
The City of Santa Ana
Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 647‑5626
crodriguez5@santa-ana.org
McFadden Avenue Transit Signal Priority Pilot: Arcadis is
partnering with the City of Santa Ana to implement a cloud
based Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system along McFadden
Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue Corridor
Regional TSSP: This design‑build project modernizes a
15-mile, 61-intersection regional corridor spanning six
The City of Anaheim
Jane Keely, Principal Traffic Engineer
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 765‑5202
jkeely@anaheim.net
Avenue to improve mobility and reduce transit delays. After nearly a year of collaboration, the City shifted from
Opticom to a cloud TSP solution based on Arcadis’ guidance and presentations. Arcadis is leading a multi‑phase
process that includes evaluating four qualified systems, guiding selection, managing deployment, and overseeing
pilot testing. Post-deployment, we will monitor performance using the Harbor TSP dashboard to assess transit
benefits and impacts on traffic flow. | Project Cost: $1.1M
jurisdictions by upgrading traffic signal and communication infrastructure. The work includes deploying new
fiber optic and wireless radio systems, installing advanced traffic signal controllers and cabinets, and optimizing
timing at four Caltrans ramp intersections to improve coordination with adjacent arterials. By integrating a robust,
modern ITS network, the project enhances real‑time traffic management capabilities, reduces congestion, and
strengthens regional mobility for the communities served. | Project Cost: $5.4M
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 29
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All Exhibit H, References Worksheet must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits H.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 29
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All Exhibit H, References Worksheet must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits H.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
Alicia Yang, PE, Senior Project Manager
600 S. Main Street, P.O. Box 14184, Orange, CA 92863
(714) 560‑5362
ayang@octa.net
Baseline Countywide Signal Timing: Baseline is a signal
timing optimization project that involves optimizing over 2,500
intersections. The Arcadis portion is about 450 intersections
City of Fountain Valley Citywide ITS Support Services:
Arcadis is providing as-needed support to provide advice
with changes being implemented on the City’s fiber optic
in South Orange County from Mission Viejo to the County Line in San Clemente. Arcadis is developing a modern
approach to signal timing analysis, optimization and on-going operation and maintenance for the region of
signals by utilizing modern probe data collection systems, probe safety data systems and innovative new AI
algorithms developed by Arcadis Engineers. | Project Cost: $1.3M
communication system and ethernet networking configurations. This contract is focused on the continuity of
services that Arcadis staff have been providing to the City for over 15 years, while at another firm. |
Project Cost: $50,000
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #25/26-010
for
Design and Construction Support Services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase III
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 29 of 29
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All Exhibit H, References Worksheet must be submitted
in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits H.
The City of Fountain Valley
Temo Galvez, Deputy Public Works Director / City Engineer
10200 Slater Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
(714) 593‑4517
temo.galvez@fountainvalley.gov
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Rancho Cucamonga ATMS Phase 3 - ARCADIS BAFO 042426
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Ta
s
k
8
L
e
a
d
Pa
u
l
F
r
i
s
l
i
e
Se
n
i
o
r
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
Ga
b
r
i
e
l
M
u
r
i
l
l
o
Ta
s
k
6
L
e
a
d
Br
a
u
l
i
o
R
a
m
i
r
e
z
Ta
s
k
3
,
7
,
1
0
L
e
a
d
Al
e
x
I
n
g
o
g
l
i
a
Ta
s
k
2
a
n
d
4
L
e
a
d
Ev
a
n
S
h
i
p
l
e
y
Se
n
i
o
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Ma
t
t
G
l
a
s
s
e
r
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Ci
e
r
a
F
e
r
n
a
n
d
e
z
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Pa
t
r
i
c
k
J
a
c
k
s
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Sa
m
a
n
t
h
a
H
e
r
n
a
n
d
e
z
Ad
m
i
n
Billing Rate 322 448 309 229 207 287 141 172 120 114
Task 1: Project Management 82 4 8 8 10 6 16 0 0 32 166 42,196.00$ 1,000$ -$ -$ 43,196.00$
Administration and PM 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 86
PMP 8 2 10
Project Safety Plan 8 2 10
Project Schedule 20 20
Project Status Reports/Invoicing 28 18 46
Project Meetings 18 4 8 8 10 6 16 0 0 10 80 1,000$
Kick-off meeting 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 18
Monthly meetings 14 2 6 6 8 4 14 8 62
Task 2: Agency Coordination 8 0 6 8 30 0 16 0 0 0 68 14,728.00$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ 19,728.00$
Caltrans Coordination 2 2 4 10 8 26
Caltrans Encroachment Permit 4 2 10 16 5,000$
Other Agency Coordination 2 2 4 10 8 26
Task 3: Existing Conditions Signal Evaluation 6 4 0 36 6 0 52 0 36 0 140 24,862.00$ 1,000$ -$ -$ 22,656$ 48,518.00$
Counts 2 6 8 22,656$
Before Studies 2 8 2 12 12 36 1,000$
Synchro Analysis, Reports 2 4 22 4 40 24 96
Task 4: Preliminary Investigations 10 0 18 32 82 0 88 0 80 0 310 55,092.00$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ 56,092.00$
Data Collection 2 8 8 18
Field Work 4 16 32 40 40 40 172 1,000$
Base Maps 2 2 30 32 40 106
Utility Coordination 2 4 8 14
Task 5: Environmental Compliance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ 70,085$ -$ -$ 70,085.00$
Environmental Compliance 0 70,085$
Task 6: Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) 30 6 104 0 180 0 250 0 270 0 840 149,394.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 149,394.00$
City Plans 22 2 80 140 200 220 664
Caltrans Plans 8 4 24 40 50 50 176
Task 7: Signal Timing Sheets 2 4 0 50 60 0 80 0 32 0 228 41,426.00$ -$ 14,166$ -$ 55,592.00$
Timing Sheet Development 2 4 50 60 80 32 228 14,166$
Task 8: Construction Support 28 4 20 34 12 0 20 4 20 0 142 33,166.00$ 750$ -$ 9,784$ -$ 43,700.00$
Pre-Con Meeting 4 2 4 4 4 18
Construction Support 22 2 12 30 66 750$ 9,784$
As-Builts 2 4 12 20 20 58
Task 9: Central Management System and Integration 4 4 0 52 40 0 0 0 0 0 100 23,268.00$ 2,500$ -$ 19,565$ -$ 45,333.00$
Timing Implementation 2 2 32 40 76 1,500$
Integration 2 2 20 24 1,000$ 19,565$
Task 10: Performance Monitoring and Reports 6 2 0 10 0 16 108 18 0 0 160 28,034.00$ 1,500$ -$ -$ -$ 29,534.00$
After Studies 2 10 84 96 1,500$
Reporting 4 2 16 24 18 64
Total 176 28 156 230 420 22 630 22 438 32 2,154 412,166.00$ 12,750$ 70,085$ 43,515$ 22,656$ 561,172.00$
Optional Task 11: Cultural and Biological Resources
Technical Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ 100,156$ -$ -$ 100,156.00$
Optional Studies 0 100,156$
Ta
s
k
T
o
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
T
a
s
k
H
o
u
r
s
Ar
c
a
d
i
s
T
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
Tasks
Arcadis
Du
d
e
k
Ta
s
k
5
a
n
d
1
1
L
e
a
d
LL
G
Ta
s
k
9
L
e
a
d
OD
C
Ai
m
T
D
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 18
Last Revised: 01/11/2018
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Task 1: Project Management 382 days?Wed 7/1/26 Thu 12/16/27
2 NTP Wed 7/1/26
3 Kick-Off Meeting Tue 7/7/26
4 Monthly Meetings 371 days Thu 7/16/26 Thu 12/16/27
23 30% Review Meeting 1 day Wed 12/2/26 Wed 12/2/26
24 60% Review Meeting 1 day Tue 3/9/27 Tue 3/9/27
25 90% Review Meeting 1 day Tue 5/4/27 Tue 5/4/27
26 Task 2: Agency Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
27 Caltrans Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
28 Caltrans Review Meeting 1 1 day Wed 12/9/26 Wed 12/9/26
29 Caltrans Review Meeting 2 1 day Wed 3/17/27 Wed 3/17/27
30 Agency Coordination 240 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 6/4/27
31 Task 3: Existing Conditions Signal Evaluation 94 days Tue 9/15/26 Fri 1/22/27
32 Counts 3 days Tue 9/15/26 Thu 9/17/26
33 Before Studies 3 days Tue 9/15/26 Thu 9/17/26
34 Synchro Analysis 54 days Mon 9/21/26 Thu 12/3/26
35 Draft Summary Report 1 day Fri 12/4/26 Fri 12/4/26
36 City Review 25 days Mon 12/7/26 Fri 1/8/27
37 Revise Report 9 days Mon 1/11/27 Thu 1/21/27
38 Final Summary Report 1 day Fri 1/22/27 Fri 1/22/27
39 Task 4: Preliminary Investigations 140 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 1/15/27
40 As-Builts/Data Collections 5 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 7/10/26
41 Field Review 10 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/24/26
42 Utilitiy Coordination 140 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 1/15/27
43 Base Maps 20 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/7/26
44 Task 5: Environmental Compliance 170 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 2/26/27
45 Compliance Forms and Approvals 170 days Mon 7/6/26 Fri 2/26/27
46 Task 6: Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E)209 days Mon 8/10/26 Thu 5/27/27
47 30% Plans & Estimates 55 days Mon 8/10/26 Fri 10/23/26
48 City Review 23 days Mon 10/26/26 Wed 11/25/26
49 Caltrans Review 23 days Mon 10/26/26 Wed 11/25/26
50 60% Plans & Estimates 40 days Mon 11/30/26 Fri 1/22/27
51 City Review 30 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/5/27
52 Caltrans Review 30 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/5/27
53 90% Plans & Estimates 25 days Mon 3/8/27 Fri 4/9/27
54 City Review 15 days Mon 4/12/27 Fri 4/30/27
55 Caltrans Review 15 days Mon 4/12/27 Fri 4/30/27
56 Final Plans & Estimates 15 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 5/21/27
57 90% Specifications 15 days Mon 3/22/27 Fri 4/9/27
58 Final Specifications 15 days Mon 5/3/27 Fri 5/21/27
59 Final PS&E Package Submittal 3 days Tue 5/25/27 Thu 5/27/27
60 Task 7: Signal Timing Sheets 50 days?Mon 1/25/27 Fri 4/2/27
61 Timing Sheet Development 29 days Mon 1/25/27 Thu 3/4/27
62 Draft Submittal 1 day?Fri 3/5/27 Fri 3/5/27
63 City Review 15 days Mon 3/8/27 Fri 3/26/27
64 Revise Timing Sheets 4 days Mon 3/29/27 Thu 4/1/27
65 Final Submittal 1 day Fri 4/2/27 Fri 4/2/27
66 Task 8: Construction Support 189 days?Tue 6/1/27 Fri 2/18/28
67 Bid Support 60 days Tue 6/1/27 Mon 8/23/27
68 Pre-Construction Meeting Wed 8/25/27
69 Construction Support 120 days Mon 8/30/27 Fri 2/11/28
70 Final As-Builts 5 days Mon 2/14/28 Fri 2/18/28
71 Task 9: Central Management System and Integration 40 days Mon 1/3/28 Fri 2/25/28
72 Integration 20 days Mon 1/3/28 Fri 1/28/28
73 Timing Implementation 10 days Mon 2/7/28 Fri 2/18/28
74 Fine Tuning 5 days Mon 2/21/28 Fri 2/25/28
75 Task 10: Performance Monitoring and Reporting (12 Months)262 days Mon 3/6/28 Tue 3/6/29
7/1
7/7
12/2
3/9
5/4
12/9
3/17
12/4
1/22
5/27
3/5
4/2
8/25
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MarQtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Qtr 1, 2027 Qtr 2, 2027 Qtr 3, 2027 Qtr 4, 2027 Qtr 1, 2028
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
Page 1
Project: RCP3_Schedule_030526Date: Mon 3/9/26
7. Project Schedule
43The City of Rancho Cucamonga | RFP #25/26-010 - Design & Construction Support Services for the ATMS Phase III
Docusign Envelope ID: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: E3339A5B-CF59-8524-829E-D36FF0B17515 Status: Completed
Subject: Complete with Docusign: CO 2026-094 PSA - ATMS III.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 104 Signatures: 3 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 5 Initials: 0 Janae Swaggard
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
janae.swaggard@cityofrc.us
IP Address: 2600:1700:9e50:
Record Tracking
Status: Original
6/4/2026 6:10:57 PM
Holder: Janae Swaggard
janae.swaggard@cityofrc.us
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Paul Frislie
paul.frislie@arcadis.com
Principal ITS Engineer
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 170.85.54.113
Sent: 6/4/2026 6:14:02 PM
Viewed: 6/5/2026 10:54:36 AM
Signed: 6/5/2026 10:56:42 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 6/5/2026 10:54:36 AM
ID: e2f704d0-b15c-46ac-9343-a425ca1fac1b
Gabriel Murillo
gabriel.murillo@arcadis.com
North America ITS and Conn Market Leader
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Drawn on Device
Using IP Address:
2607:fb91:285:1217:f4f8:119:64f7:ca4c
Signed using mobile
Sent: 6/5/2026 10:56:44 AM
Viewed: 6/5/2026 12:09:29 PM
Signed: 6/5/2026 12:11:07 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 6/5/2026 12:09:29 PM
ID: 9f315439-c809-49ce-9e74-d709a708761a
L. Dennis Michael
dennis.michael@cityofrc.us
Mayor/President
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 174.215.19.226
Signed using mobile
Sent: 6/5/2026 12:11:09 PM
Viewed: 6/5/2026 1:02:20 PM
Signed: 6/5/2026 1:02:44 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
City Clerk Services Department
ClerkContracts@CityofRC.us
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 6/5/2026 1:02:46 PM
Viewed: 6/8/2026 10:02:37 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 6/4/2026 6:14:02 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 6/5/2026 1:02:20 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 6/5/2026 1:02:44 PM
Completed Security Checked 6/5/2026 1:02:46 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office (we, us or Company) may be
required by law to provide to you certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the
terms and conditions for providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically through the
DocuSign system. Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can
access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to this Electronic Record and
Signature Disclosure (ERSD), please confirm your agreement by selecting the check-box next to
‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’ before clicking ‘CONTINUE’ within the
DocuSign system.
Getting paper copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper copy of any record provided or made available
electronically to you by us. You will have the ability to download and print documents we send
to you through the DocuSign system during and immediately after the signing session and, if you
elect to create a DocuSign account, you may access the documents for a limited period of time
(usually 30 days) after such documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to
send you paper copies of any such documents from our office to you, you will be charged a
$0.00 per-page fee. You may request delivery of such paper copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you decide to receive notices and disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time
change your mind and tell us that thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures
only in paper format. How you must inform us of your decision to receive future notices and
disclosure in paper format and withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically is described below.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. Further, you will no longer be able to use the DocuSign system to
receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign electronically documents
from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 2/22/2022 12:08:29 PM
Parties agreed to: Paul Frislie, Gabriel Murillo
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through the DocuSign system all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you
inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures
electronically from us.
How to contact City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to: jasmin.oriel@cityofrc.us
To advise City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office of your new email address
To let us know of a change in your email address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at jasmin.oriel@cityofrc.us and in
the body of such request you must state: your previous email address, your new email
address. We do not require any other information from you to change your email address.
If you created a DocuSign account, you may update it with your new email address through your
account preferences.
To request paper copies from City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office
To request delivery from us of paper copies of the notices and disclosures previously provided
by us to you electronically, you must send us an email to jasmin.oriel@cityofrc.us and in the
body of such request you must state your email address, full name, mailing address, and
telephone number. We will bill you for any fees at that time, if any.
To withdraw your consent with City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office
To inform us that you no longer wish to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your signing session, and on the subsequent page,
select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an email to jasmin.oriel@cityofrc.us and in the body of such request you must state
your email, full name, mailing address, and telephone number. We do not need any other
information from you to withdraw consent.. The consequences of your withdrawing consent for
online documents will be that transactions may take a longer time to process..
Required hardware and software
The minimum system requirements for using the DocuSign system may change over time. The
current system requirements are found here: https://support.docusign.com/guides/signer-guide-
signing-system-requirements.
Acknowledging your access and consent to receive and sign documents electronically
To confirm to us that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to
other electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please confirm that you have
read this ERSD, and (i) that you are able to print on paper or electronically save this ERSD for
your future reference and access; or (ii) that you are able to email this ERSD to an email address
where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference and access. Further,
if you consent to receiving notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic format as described
herein, then select the check-box next to ‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’ before
clicking ‘CONTINUE’ within the DocuSign system.
By selecting the check-box next to ‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’, you confirm
that:
You can access and read this Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure; and
You can print on paper this Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure, or save or send
this Electronic Record and Disclosure to a location where you can print it, for future
reference and access; and
Until or unless you notify City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office as described
above, you consent to receive exclusively through electronic means all notices,
disclosures, authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to
be provided or made available to you by City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office
during the course of your relationship with City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's
Office.