Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004/12/08 - Agenda Packet
DECEMBER 8, PLANNING COMMISSION 2004 AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A enda 2 - 5 A Environmental Assessment and Development 6 - 120 Review DRC2004-00061 B, E Environmental Assessment and Development 121 - 253 Review DRC2004-00564 Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16714 C, F Development Review DRC2004-00692 254 - 284 Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16574 D Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16455 285 - 303 G Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16657 304 - 320 H, I Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 321 - 416 SUBTT16812 Variance DRC2004-00566 J Hillside Desi n Review DRC2003-01071 417 - 441 • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA n C CAMONGA December 8, 2004 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ~ Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Maaas _ Vice Chairman McNiel _ Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION OF COMMENDATION TO NANCY FONG III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 10, 2004 November 10, 2004, Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without d~scuss~on If anyone has concern over any dem, ~f should be removed for discussion A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 15single-family lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-02 Related Files Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Minor Exception DRC2004-00662 On January 9, 2002, a Mitigated Negative PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA December 8, 2004 RnNCeo CUCAMONCA 2 Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 The California Environmental QualityAct provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for w. subsequent prolects or minor revisions to prolects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00564 - CECIL R CARNEY -The development of 3 industrial bwldings totaling 15,501 square feet on 1 48 acre of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES - A review of 4single-family homes on 90 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7388 Teak Way -APN 1077-041-56 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16574 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-fill Development) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wart to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Comm~ss~on by stating your name and address Atl such opm~ons shall be limited to 5 minutes per ind~wdual for each project Please sign in after speaking D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16455 -HAIFA - A request to subdivide 1 9 acre of land into three parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and W ilson Avenue -APN 1074-261-02 This protect is categorically exempt from the requrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 - CECIL R CARNEY - A request to subdivide 1 48 acre into 3 parcels for industrial purposes in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue - APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00564 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration • • C~ • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~~HO December 8, 2004 Cuc,ufoNCn 3 F TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16574 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES - A request to subdivide 90 acre into 4single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7388 Teak Way "' -APN 1077-041-56 Related file Development Review DRC2004-00692 This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelmes Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Diwsions) G TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - SUBTPM16657- FUSCOE ENGINEERING - A request to subdivide 710 net acres of land into a single parcel subdivision for industrial tenant space in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, north of Arrow Route -APN 0229-021-34 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00732 This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelmes Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 -BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC - A request to subdivide 8 85 gross acres of land into 30single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue -APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, and 34 Related file Variance DRC2004-00566 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration I VARIANCE DRC2004-00566 -BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for an increase in wall height above 8 feet to reduce freeway traffic noise for 30 single-family lots proposed in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue - APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, and 34 Related file Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16812 VI. NEW BUSINESS J HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS & CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS - A request to construct a 2-story single-family residence with a total floor area of about 7,500 square feet (footprint approximately 3,900 square feet) on a 20,300 square foot parcel that includes excavation in excess of 5 feet (the maximum permissible in the Hillside Overlay) in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre), located at 10946 Carriage Drive -APN 1074-561-25 This protect is categorically PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA December 8, 2004 Itnxctto 4 cUCAMONGA exempt from the requirements of the Callfornla Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) (Class 3 Exemption -New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS I This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/oumment time If dems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS DRC2004-01072 -ABUNDANT LIVING CHURCH 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 2, 2004, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours poor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired n u • • ~ Vicinity Map Planning Commission December 8, 2004 Hl, • C, n U * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga A CS,C T H E C I T Y O r RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE December 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 15 single-family lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-02 Related Files Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Minor Exception DRC2004-00662 On January 9, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commisslon for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 The . California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Densltv 1 63 dwelling units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family residentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Demens-Tolstoy House Estate and vacant IandNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-family residentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant IandNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) C General Pian Designations Protect Slte -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site is bounded on the east by Archibald Avenue, to the south by the historic landmark Demens-Tolstoy Ranch House and an approved 11-lot single-family . subdivision under construction, to the west by asingle-family residence and vacant land, and to the north by existing single-family houses All properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) ITEM "A" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The project site has a recorded final map (Tract 16262) and an approved Development Revew (DRC2001-00584) for semi-custom house product The original applicant, Piedra Development, has graded the site, installed utilities, and paved Alexis Avenue Piedra Development has since sold Tract 16262 to Toll Brothers Toll Brothers is proposing to develop the subdroision with their own house product The proposed protect consists of four floor plans that range in square footage from 4,466 square feet to 5,864 square feet Architectural styles include Spamsh Colonial, Tuscan, Craftsmen, Mission, and Manor The protect site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which regwres architectural design techniques that minimize the amount of grading and allow the house to follow the natural grades The protect has been designed so that all floor plans have stepped pads, with elevation changes ranging from a minimum of 3 feet to a maximum 5 8 feet, thereby meeting the design goals of the Hillside Overlay District All plans have variation in the footprints and articulation in the wall planes, thereby, avoiding "box on box" bwlding forms All plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong variation, and are within the 30-foot high bwlding envelope requirement Ail horse corrals meet the 70-foot radius regwrement from all adtacent dwelling units, and the Community Trail on Archibald Avenue is requred to be installed with the proposed protect B Minor Exception DRC2004-00662 The protect site includes a Minor Exception (DRC2004-00662) that was previously approved by the City Planner The Minor Exception will allow up to 8-foot high combination retaining/freestanding walls for grade differential purposes for Lots 9 through 15 The standard height limit for walls in residential districts is 6 feet Because of the native grades on the protect site, several lots require wall heights in excess of the standard 6-foot height limit All retaining walls wdl be within the maximum allowable 4-foot height limit C Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fong, McPhail, and Stewart) on September 14, 2004 At the meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings, in response to staff comments The Committee reviewed the protect and did not recommend approval The Committee indicated that although the applicant had made some improvements to the side and rear elevations, additional enhancement to the side and rear elevations would be required in order to meet the 360- degree architectural requirement The Committee directed the applicant to add substantial amounts of architectural elements to the side and rear elevations including, but not limited to, divided light windows, recesses, decorative wrought iron accents, corbels, pot shelves, Craftsman style windows, shutters, and arched windows as appropriate to each architectural style At the October 19, 2004, meeting (Fletcher, McPhail, Buller), staff presented revsed drawings, noting that the applicant had modified the plans to include substantial enhancements to the side and rear elevations on all floor plans Staff pointed out that the following architectural elements had been added, where appropriate to the selected architectural style (e g Spamsh Colonial, Craftsman, etc) divided light windows, shutters, . base treatment with battered cap, stucco recesses with wrought iron accents, faux wrought iron balconies, arched windows with decorative sills and surrounds, wood siding to wall ~-a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 Page 3 planes, and stone or siding to chimneys The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval D Grading Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Grading Review Committee on September 14, 2004 The Committee approved the protect, subtect to the following condition Final design and materials used to prowde access from the horse corrals to the trail shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval during plan check The Committee's condition has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval E Technical Rewew Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on September 14, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval Environmental Assessment The proposed Development Review is for the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously recorded tract map (SUBTT16262) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on January 9, 2002, for the 15-lot subdivision (SUBTT16262) The protect will be regwred to implement all mitigation measures adopted m the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, thereby, ensuring that any potential impacts of the protect will remain less-than-significant Staff is of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because (1) all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately under the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted on January 9, 2002, for Tract 16262, (2) the proposed Development Review will not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration No new environmental information has been presented that would raise or create new or adverse impacts not already considered m the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, and (3) the California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration G Neighborhood Meeting The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on May 27, 2004 In summary, the five residents m attendance had general questions about the architecture of the houses, height of the houses, and concern over the temporary impacts of construction (dust, trash, etc) Planning staff and the applicant answered the residents' questions At the neighborhood meeting, Mr Darnel Pearson, who resides at 9639 Whirlaway Street, which is located in the subdivision immediately north of protect site, voiced concern over his historic use of the protect site to access his horse corral He noted that at the Public Hearing for Tract 16262 on January 9, 2002, there was public discussion and a requirement placed on the Development Rewew (DRC2001-00584) by Piedra Development requiring the applicantto work with staff to facilitate a mutual agreement between the applicant and abutting property owners to the north for access to the private trail of Tract SUBTT16262 Since the neighborhood meeting, Planrnng staff has monitored the progress of the condition requiring a mutual agreement between Toll Brothers and the Pearson property for equestrian access Toll Brothers has drafted and presented an access agreement for equestrian purposes to the Pearsons At the time of the writing of this report, the final details of the access agreement were being negotiated between Toll Brothers and Mr Pearson ~}- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised ~n the Inland Valley Daiiy Bulletin newspaper Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2004-00061 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Bul er City Planner BB DG\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Draft Reso - Site Utilization Map -Site Plan -Conceptual Grading Plan -Conceptual Landscape Plan - Floor Plans - Building Elevations and Roof Plans - Building Envelope Sections - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated October 19, 2004 - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 9, 2002 - Irntial Study ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00061 -`t ~~ SITE UTILIZATION MAP THE ENCLAVE ~` BY TOLL BROTHERS TR NO 16262 w 0 ®~ VICINITY MAP Nor ID scar - lFfpVP r~'1.~1~ p,, no. 6 r i r N O• xrvi r ~ 7 ' ~ ~ RKI 1 m ,a A .P,n ~.,, I ® _,...m ~ 4p ~,<. w. ~..~ , o ,,. ~ ~. ~y I .,. ~.~ ~....o,.,a Cltt Oi RANCHO CUCANONGA iR NO 16262 °"`°'°' ' DRC200~-00061 PRFPAFCD flY ®^I~NSAKE 0.H `~SSO C~ATM~S lya~ we ura~ nNNy~w ~rt AIAY~Yn Toll 1JroLhers, Inc ne lown .xo covxrar xmo swrz soo ()II) 9lf-Y )(p !~~ ()~~) 9)5-9111 DETAILED SITE PLAN THE ENCLAVE BY TOLL BROTHERS ~~ TR. N0. - 1 6262 LEffAa ~osm ,. , ~ .,,M„~,.~.rt,~.~, rn a~~fl..w _..... ® ~rt~.a.. m~,~A_ ,_o „~~~..,~,.ne_o,.~, ~e. M,,R~r I ~ ~ ~ I _ . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TR NO 16262 ~RC1004-00061 HUNSA KER & ASSOCIATES i e ~ c n.wwc womrc ~ suwrwc ,..w.....uw ..~.. o.. Ruw om., Toll Drothcrs, Inc ~,s .e.,, o ~,,,,.. ~.4 .u.~ OP NE( [~ 9)!6p ()11f s.~ IIY ()~~f en-9)11 • w.um 031V4 „, .. I. C~ ,G~ W W ~y0 W J U W a v V U W a 5]5 :§4:5 s~ _ .E 8 i.. 9. ~~ ;~ 46 F~i € i ~ FY u<~ ~!i" ~ ~ ~~i b u~t ~ ~a: ~~ ~- r ig6 b,~;idt Z§ ~~ 8 ~~ v €e 5',€ db 9 > i ~~'bd~~~~ =F, t€d€,~E s;9~ €FB7n$~ F, de$d ~d39d~ 4~gdC ~e'€tikyd ~ dd~dd66 b ' wl ~ 'u e ~ ~ i ~~ peiiiSBiE 36th! ~~'df~~~"ii~~ „I i e r~ €~i f~ €c i ~ €€9191€f€3:tx ~ a1,,~~J ®I ~1<~ `o ~~ ~i 5 s,oills~s~l~R~~i33 3i i!iilSi9ildlb!€ii~g~il Y@ ~ e k ~s ~ ~ 'e ~ i y~qg e~ g i~ p~~ @` ~ $?~c ~~ dg~~ $~~~ ~ ~` qj ~ p~y$ y e a~ ~ b ~e ~~ ~ ~~ €~~;~ ~~ 3~~g~ yp;~~ g~ ~i~ ~~~ ~ ~~ s~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ la ~ a ~~ : I~ ~~ ~3 9 s' pp 2a€€. a; ~d;e a ed•a aSi Ye dsE ~ 3d ~~ dd ~_ ~ ~ ~d 3dd ~~ e` i €F Eta ~y8~ ~ ~`~ $tl a €c ~i ~ n " '9 ty` b9 ~ €aa a ~~d° yggC~ g#d ~°, ~sp`u a ~~ $; ~ ~ ~ dl ~@~ 2C ~ ~ g~ ~` se~ 8~= 8a ~$ ode ¢C ~~ ~~ k` ~~~ < a iY 'k~e ga @x- a~ ~ ~g3g IS~ ~~ ~ w~ ~£££ ~~ ~4 a~ ~ q ~ a `~' ' p ~~ 8 t~ €ee° S e Ya wp Y 3 ~- # ~ d@~ ~y~ $a„ 1a~8 §e~ iilb q~'% pqd ''gi a~ ~~~ '~ €€ ~€ ~ °~ ~ a ~ Ba ~~d ~q@~ ~ g e~d alb 8 ~I~ ~ ~ ~ Y e `4 ~ ~ °e ~ d~~ g € klCg ~ ~~~e~ sd~ ~ € d d ~ ~ ~ ~d h d~ W dg~ ° ~ ~~ ds§ ~~6~ ~~ e~~~ e~~~ ~°- €~ ~°g€ 3d ~~~ B~ ~~ ids ~ d~ ~ n~~ d~a ~~ ~~e ~~~~"s ~a~ t3€~~ d€rd e~ ~~ a~$d a~ tad sl e~ ~e~ a YE ~i;Y I€~ ~I€ i ~~5 ga• ~a3 Ye ~3 de- ~~ P~ ~~ ~~ S ~I ~~~ k3 ~ ~ Z u~~~a G 5a~~ °o~~~~ o m rm y ~ b .. e a i rc~tNO ~ maN U J(]~ O Z 0 0 x ra ~ m~0 Z U Z > r, N F o SwU w c Q C a~ U W H a d ~ si`. 3d'3g °g '' yaF~' d a~5€~2 Q $' pd 5e pt@e~~ ~` as @Si9 ~ ~~yg€g€~ pyaptl~Q6 ~gg 6e Aa~4d~y~ deg~d~ €E Id ~~~~~~~~ $i"~~~~ ~~ ip ~ a $ e F ~~~~~@~ 8t ~eEs ~eye @~~~~ ~~a~~~ 3Y B~~ ~g5 ~fbf~~ Ea@ ~€ Eg7 €~a~4~~ kSe~ ;'1 33 ~F .e ``s • '~ =I U~ _ .:e ~; ~~$ ~~~~ g md~8 a Y 5 4 E _ ~~€ e5~e >C ° ~ ~ b 1 ~C'. s ~ ~~ nd{4€~~A li3€~id ° W~€ ~~~~~ g~~ =E~ ~~~~ns I:li! ! as i3 ~iit ip3 I tl u i!b ~ u3 as. 3 Si yy p t ii • Fpm Qul gif~l ~d'b ~I a 1 B ' d P ~ ui "~ e d `. ^~ 1 I ~~ ~~ ~~ „~ ~ IY tli ~~ I p7 d ~~ ~ ~ y i I O CC g ~ ~ ApA I.~+!~ 4~ ~d dli-~;[[ ~ ~ ~ r t ilil= o glpB¢aeaR Vp~/'/®N~ y(i~ 1~'iE X64 C~CS~y~y~ ry~ryd~~@~~~ ~l~•~(EJg ~t~:i _ 311 k~E b n~ .Y Z ~T~ ~d~li ~~y / N W ~! < -.: y z A Y i/ ~~/ / ~~e;~ ~iA4A yy .a d e y ~ ~ ~~ ! ~ ~ ~ ge < ~~ .F ~§~~~ as ~ ~ v 4 e &e ~ `s ~q F a'% ~ ~y ° e ;~ g ~~ ~ e~ v F` ` e# , ~~ F ~; ~ ~C~;~f L 4FL~°~ Sg S EaF ~ as Sg FFF v d i. z xeeS s'F~ q s`_~ ~. , .~ ~~ '~X4~'~UvT G-\ a E~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~5~ .~ ~ i ~. ~e~ ~~ it ~y p°~ ai.i ~ 4~~ `~ ~d! I 0 ~: ~ 4 o g Gg~ ~aa~~ S~ s a °` ~ ~ e F i~ _ 4~`a~ ~y3 ~ ~ ~ u €_ ~tt d !~g ~~I ~~ I .-pe ~$ 16 IS .~~ c Y \ ' 1 J F j~ ,_ ~ F I IiF ~ ~ ~ • f ~4 y ~~ a~n~ iY ~ ~ ~ F ~ °S L: O o F G o °33 ~,~d ~e~ ~~~ >. s^„ 6 f~-- S I,J '[fo b~ ~p~ ~° 4 i~ y ?aj ~'', 3 ~y~ a ~i~4 F p~p ~ C 4IA~9~e t Q ~ ~g~ ~ ~ k~;~ ~ Y~~ x~+ $@Le a _ ~p• 8 '- ~-lg ~I ~a~( V O'•I c"< I @~.~F l¢l¢ e -•I .~., a z ~ ~~ ®~ c {~ ~ f ~i ~ Ug ~~ ~~~9 qqa m`i1a@ Fn c h G ~$ U II 0 0 N b 2 N ass's ~' hA, pY a rY 8.$ ~ ~F 1 pgFi Q~~@~ ~ e ei= F ppll ~~Q~i r a 6g~SlSSS~yg~@~ipge. ~ ~FFi16tQlF o Y n O r U '^ F o ,o =e8 ~ Y W o _. 5 ~ P AP e ~~ p a} ~ ~eA e,~y^ .~ ~ a e °~F F W F~ ~~ ~ N~ t~~~ @~~~~~~ ~d~d ~,~p~a~ ~~~~6~~ b °~- ~¢ - A.r< «.P ..q , .,, M. ~J I SECTION 8A x LO(T 8 I_ ,„_. j .M ~ [vc nv2M If E (~ I ~ Iwm I ~ I ~ I l I SECTION 7C '` ~ -x s s a r .n w.. m.- .ww _ _ rca~' g IR jib SECTION 7B m^ s _ ~~ ,.p« y - •I ~.-ma SECTION 7A LOT 7 g"~~ ~ f 1~ I i • SECTION 6B I HS'w'"...' i...>I n -moo .., ,~ .h ms r-mw I"~ ^ „ I _ LOT 6 SECTION 6A .x s T • x ` ' LOT 5 SECTION 5A SCALE 1 20 HORIZ 1 20 VERT y~~. ,- i .~ Ia,,, .,,., ww~, P l 1 4 ~ ~ wKK 9^. .. 4 SECTION 4B ....: ,w>. ~ ~ I ^ n act ~ \ A i ni SECTION 4A LOT 4 '• v` I ~o ~ i ,...~ „ I~ o.~ 11dd 1 I SECTION 3A LOT 3 ...- n4 a.. I.y.' ~ ~ ~_ v. ... ..,. , „ , ' ,.~,o ~a..bR. ~~ i 1 ~~ I,.~ ~ ~ s I SECTION 26 I v„ I ~ _~V~ ' ~n~.m., . ~ ~ j~ l l I C I I~ _ LOT 2 SEC110N 2A ..z~ w~ ~ ~ d -~-~ DRCYG SECTION 1A ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM~ nmAao sr PR ECISE GRADING PLAN NUNSASE0. 6 ASSOCIATES T R NO 16262 Tall Br o~ers. nW ~...'- ' . .ow n.lr - ~~ .:a„I «n c vxu . A V"` '1; " I /moo cev. r_mtl, ` IiON] tY ] ~.MO OW '~ "°®°"°"~"._ ~- +'"~ SECTION ~9A I l I k LOT 9 s ~ ! I,~ . , °^ ~` ECTION IOBx ti ~ ~I ~ ms ~ ~. ~ T s. " - ~ ,.,,..,.z ~.,.. r .~~., ... ' SECTION 10A ~ LOT 7 0 , , W; ~ . , "°°"°° „~ i SECTION 1 1C _~ ~~° `°` J°n~°' 7 ° >... '"°""°"' K r"° :a~ _ ,.,,, m.. S~CTION FIIB ?I _ x ~ ~~J ~ ~ ~ ~ I ; ° SE TION 11A I =1 ?~aa ? ? LOT 1 1 LOT 12 "°~°^ 'm ~. `~ ~ ~ SFyCTION ~9C y '~ rnl ~~ eb ° w "'°°'°" ~„.., ~1 ~''`~ ~ ~ SECTI0N,~13B ~ ' ~. '* ~ ` },M ~~^~ S CTIO N 13A ~ M ~ , ~~ SCALE LOT 13 _ A y p^ I °, r. 1 20 HORIZ ~^ 4C CTA N I : 1 20 VERT I. ~~ I° a - ~~^ '_ "' ," ~. ~SE"110N °148 _ zl ~ I I ,w~ ,. „ ~ r _ '~,~ _ ~ "~^ ~ ~SECT fON 14A ~ ^ ~ _, ^ T ~ LO 14 ~ ~ ~, ^°~°^ s SE TION 158 i I C _ ~`" I ~_~~ II ~ ~ ~~ ~'~ KK PR ECISE GRADING OT 1 S XONSAKFIt 6 ASSOCIATES ®~ T R NO 16: -~ -~- ~-~ roll B ro~ ers, Inc ^ ~ ~E . ~. a ...m. ~ »., F,,.,...~. ~,,.,..~.,,, k g ~ ~k B ~~y ~ i ar°P~- Par ~ ~' "kx kE R~ e .. K,. .. a s^~a __ 3ia .. P,. _.. P., ; Q'ec"$_ ~ iYi. i?'a s 'si3 se"s' ~ i3 ^ `l° I ' $ ~ LOT 4 -"- i g LOT 2 . - - - _ LOT c 1 a j j I^ r~ LOT 6 ~ ~n k R a `s gkk _ PP~~I~R~g a 4 aa~~V 5'? -g ~' ~ sl:~i~ as a_ _ s- - s inan~__~i.. M., -.. M., a.~;??:~.a _ i ~ ~ LOT..u3 ~I a4 LOT 2 n? ij i ,.G7.. _„D7., as a LOT 6 sus a n ~~ - 1' ~ I 1 ` - LOT 1 ~ '\ -- °I LOT 5 m .. m.,",m „"w - gssgaag g n A^ kA 9 sg^na 5p M7' - M7 49 04 1- i_... ~~ i~ ~~ s~aas •D7 _..07.. gaaA i~Si=i'^- LOT 4 ~ ;;~~ ..! f° ak „k '~?dp LOT 6 °'" 5 • ,~ a aa° °•~ s ~ _ _ ~ e LOT 7 r' ' t - (' - - ",A ~"d,° a ge, ~ gkA a ., 5.. -.. 5,. i kPAr s .,..,, ~ ~ ~ SCALE as ~; '" 3 y- a? ' ? ~ i'-'-~g LOT 8 ~ii ; „ a A a g-°__ -4 LOT ~ ,. ., ,. ^.. .,P7„ ..P7,. . , =' s ~ ~yy ~ c ~=la¢6 1 20 VERT A k s r ~ ~ g` ~ ~ V g: si'~ 9 LOT 5 ~n ? .D,. -.. D., a Ra: a~ a ..J 7„-..J7,. ^ ; ~~Yl i t '~ SIDE YARD SECTIONS ~ s LOT 8 p a Ei-; "'°"'""°`. :;- W ~3 _ p SEE PLAN LOT 7 _~x s9 a $k,I~ ELI '~ i a - '~ LOT 9 " :x~; LOT 13 ? ?~ ~ ~p pp e^ ?o " ,~ a Yn~sss'¢ gA ? 3.3s-g LOT 15 'k P ~ r ._.~ Pk ke LOT 12 a_ ~' a a LOT m 13 ` - .,,~. „~Fi' Y ~ _ ti -? _ a ~ a LOT 11 ag ~_"~~ ° 11 _~ LOT 12 ~ ~s x€ a 4~e.. " 4 g ~ - - - ~ "a~s_3 ~y,>=LOT 14 ~ :4? -~9-x a LOT 1 5 `gk elneP3 ~ 2"sn z.^- k„>,,°r: a o, ,. ,.,,°, ., ~~ a? . ,LOT ~.~,~., xa 3 x ~~~ LOT 1 1 a w a 4 ~ , .r g ~ @ $ a ~ ~ a a ~ .. Z., _.. Z,. a ,. R,. -., R.. a a a a : : .. , a a 3 3 a , ai =4ka4 q~ ~~aA _$ ' LOT 13~~ a°a atca_ LOT 15 ~~~ i ai 84Sa- as i.T t„_.. T7.. :a:kg: •• „>° a ,u:>, ,, Y a' aaaaa a•ae"g^-~~ --- .~ LOT 11 '~~ ~- ~Fl,._..F7., ;~:2s~~a ~o, .,Z7.._„Z7„ ~.u»., .w. 'an?i ga .,E1 E1' ~~ a- 2 a a_a'_ ^ n A _ ~ LOT '°° °^F ., = ~ 3 14 ~ ~ Cltt Gf FANCHG CUCAYONGA GG g.:~ ~ g'°~a e~e~ Ri"-"R1" nus ,.»>s.. g a L1' -' L7' sa ^ - -' - ~ PRECISE GRADING PLAN a'ry. ~~' '~. - ~^"~°I' I~'^'~ - LOT 1 2 HUNSAK~E~0. 4 ASSOCIATES TR NO 7 6262 ~W~ LOT 10 U~I~ ®~~ ®--•---`- ...~ Tolgl Brothergs, (nc `,~", ,~ w~ s_r ~_ x x 0 0 0 t 0 i 0 ` ~~ . as ~~ X x i --.,,, 69--fa. ~ ;a w s &~~;~i 4 ~~6 ~~ € w ~ {G~ d AA m ~' "~ 1 ~~~5 ~~ ~° ? '~ a ~ <, I p ml~5 yy/ "~ ; "9 x_ f F@ ~ ®~ 6 a e Q ~ e ~ a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ :~3 ~~sa:9 pp /~~ ~ > d i "~ae5 b.~ k ~a ~ ~~ ~~ d~E`yt-a~ F ~~5~5 ~~~i~. '~.~ 9~~p ~`pC~~~ l~ ~o `- . _ ~ F ';:; ` x ~oo~ „ ~ { ~ V ]l0 ~ ~~ y~ ~ G =^ I _ _ rc ''~L ~ Y • • p~0 it ~6~ U O d u ~ U~ _ U' ~ •~ ~ O'• C"< Yi g v~~= v_Y41 Eag x ue~. 0 44e ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~_ } ~s ®! a vs _ 9 ~_ LO fAI ti~ ~ J ~ti SOI - e ~ ; •I V -1 g. ` 0~ ~~ 1 X 19BB f ~~ ~~ 3~ ' O U ~ ® ~ 'I 1~ U ~~ £a5 S U~ <y tik _ V ~_ ~ a 4~ n e ~Ea~ `4, s.~F ~ ,o~E`~g r<- i ~ ro9~d x z y' -~~ ®E b p ~ o v ~ 04 I z m °o ~ 3N i; e ~ 1 u ~ my ~ _ D Z~ I O U U~ -u I' ~ U K K OZ v~ '~_ w ~.x ~~~' ~"~~ tl ~~ ~~ e ~~~~~~~ € . I ~ G L. e a c _ ~ a ~1 e I ~~ w • ~j ~ ~ ~ F ! epC~p ~ } 4 X ~Y Y kk a i g E B~~Y g~& Y q 4~ a4 w ~6 "~ " a~ e3 n c !2 Ee•y e,~ 5~ €€ e~a ~° a~p~ ~aa5 ~F EB~E fee €~ ~~~~i 8~~@~:~ ~~~r ,drrr~ 6l hn: r b Leo ~ ~ $,° ~ Y '~~L~J~~WJ 1 uQ , N ~- i F- i `r f P 4 °z 1 1 °~ ~ ~F~F ~G W 1 ~~ ,Q t 1~I ~ i~'u Y~I ,`sips I ~Y =~~~ °~ 5. E ^~a V F 0- ~j ~ ~ W~EL d. { ~ ~: e}[ w ° F 5e3 O gyp' `.~na Y C Gl~ea t = ~~ ~~ C ®~ { RS i la ~~ ~R^RFR R____ _____~µ_~.1 ~ __ 4 ~ ` Yy ~F~ ~~ 1~ q~€ B_ ~ " e - -~Y e~ ~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ e ~ °•°~~ ': 4 &~~ ~~i o 6 h~ ~ 1 FFO ~ Inq a ~~~r gI ~ . v a ~ F ~~~ F!~ ~~~ ~ p ~ a F ~~~ >~~ ~~~~ a ~1 ~~~a ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ bib ~` i YI W U 'r ,~ d; -~ FENCE -WALL ;E ~E~ ~~:~~ RAVT PALETTE o : .....~.... ~..... C.> : ..~~.......~ .._..... ©® .....o..e., ~a F.1__1 _.~.~ ul~o FfDESTRIAN GATE ~~ ~'° ,~ a~ I - SPLR FACE %OLK WALL SRIi FACE BLCIX PILASTER RAILRJAD TIE 51EP5 ~~ ~~A 3 RAIL VRl11 WRSE FENCE 3 RAIL valtt FIORSE GATE WI HORSE GATE The Enclave By Toll Brothers Tra,=16262 ~~.N Pp Rancho Cu nga, California _ 5,.N5MR 5 " ' ~~ ~ :cmm Preliminary Landscape Plan DRC2004-00061 ~ ~ i Preliminary Landscape Plan ~{~1 DRC2004-00061 1 •-•6_• i£NCE_WdLLMEGEIm W / / /~ .~.n~... ~~~ - - -~ ~ I ~ _m~. .~ r =, ~..~ .~ 6.. BPLII FdL£ BLOIX YWIl. 9PLIt FdLE gLOpC PILPBIER RAILR]HD 11E B1EPo ~~~ J t4R vMiL W.hGf F@CE ] pM KIt'L NORSE G41E YY HORSE GPIE The Enclave By Toll Brothers ~ ~ ~~ Tract 16262 0 ~' ~'-~ Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma - ~p~~~ ~~ 9LN19NIIX IJ9Of (U r_r rr_ r H99 989 9 ~ O ~ O js ~s N ~O 0 10 Q 0 N C W z W W F O z O~ W ~S/ Q ~I ~ fi Q W tf` ~LL vz N Q ~ ~ C ~ r 1 LJ ~. ~ . ~ h a CJ X~j ~1 ~1 1 ,~{: ,a1 L SA SECOND FLOOR PLAN - 9PAN19N COLONIAL EJ(TERIOR ~I-oll brothers f DRC 2004-00061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN ~voyoa 2 ~~ ~~ OPT BONUS ROOM OVER DINING ROOM H ~~ f~ LSA aouwne soorwae moll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN tvoaroa 76 FIRST FLOOR PLAN -MISSION EXTERIOR _...... . _ ', .~.r o .,r. .~. -- -- --- NR9TER ~ ~ p ~ ~ BEOROOI.1 ^ E~ k-' ~ BEDROOMS ^ - ,11 O OPEN TO e... `-~ BELOrY/ J OPI%l1ML } ~` Y-I RO.'M IIrL^~J'I~ s e~TN o i ~ ~~~ 91fTMO IV1L2 O , i INMNNN PNtl ~ tl D ~ ~~- ~I~I ~ W IC / _ __ I ll In u WIC ~ \\ / I I y ' I ~ DEDR001.~~ ®o ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ EOw ° P O i / Pi R \ f ~ ~ fr ~ 1 O --- O ~ ~ , N~ ~ I W BEDROCM3 .. ID ® ------- ZE° '^ P 1 ~~ ~~ SECOND PLOORPLAN -MISSION EXTERIOR `Toll brothers DRC 200400061 { THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA DOWN SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN ,voaoe 17 OPT. BON08 ROOM OVER DINING ROOM I.~Xn~] \• T - • L SA Y ______ Ca ~~ I ~ E O®O ! ® 7 + ' FMIR1 O ~' "~ _, ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ • n ~ uRaa . ~ FpIEN ~ V~ ® ® 4 ~ I I ~_- __ O e~m u _ jp ~ r _~ F urtm T ®° ®° - ~'i Fl ~ v~we ~ ~ ~~ MQ1 ___; _ , _ I UIWRY R-~ I~ I F t ~ I R , t I FIRST FLOOR PLAN -MISSION EXTERIOR BW11NE FOQfAIi W w rt GI~oll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN »royoa 30 .s ~ s 11' X I I I I } I _ ' ~l I i i 3 :. i i -,~~~~ e I J~ s t ' ' I~ ~ Y ~ - BWMEFOOf~OE moll brothers " DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ CARLSBAD DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN ....~,..,... ,.. t vozoa FIRST FLOOR PLAN -CRAFTSMAN EXTERIOR 44 G` ____ ~ _ O ®~ ~ + ® Y -~ ^k w~ pup[ __ _ I ~ owxo . .-. ~ I I I ~rav [f Ytn i I I I I . i_ _________~ ~ ir.~xo ~ i ® O • ~ ~_ I . ~ RIRMEN ~ ~ I F~ ~ ® ~19R/~Py L.. eAm Firtm ~ ®° ®` ~ C 1 i wi~i z aewmoue wvn~~ tuna 1 ,•~ y t W1Q•l1 p- I ~ ` ~W I P-tI II I r I I ~ : ~ I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I I GI~MGEf ~ I I ' I ~ I ~ I ~__ ~ C ~~ 111' ' J V • L SA ~* `Or 6 i , ~, - ~ yi ~ ^~° ®~ ~ ~ A OO ~ b REHEAT ~ ~ '~ wm ~ war~ReoRwx ~ ~~ I r A ~rnooez A l eEwwR a r _ ~ qE MTR ~ 9ELUYro . 1 s ~ ___ TM• _ aim O w ; 1 m _____ ®° iy ~' ~ 1 A o A ____ i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ o A b , , , ~~ ~ r D D ~I - ----- ~ .. }----- ' - ~ -----n, ---- ~ .. ~ 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN -CRAFTSMAN EXTERIOR OPTIONAL FIREPUIGE moll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CARLSBAD DOWN SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN ++rozoa 45 ~_ `Toll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO GUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO UPSLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN ~~rozon LSA FIRST FLOOR PLAN - SPANISH COLONULL EXTERIOR wuum rooTAae i ~ m- .,,,, .,~,~, 50 ~ s ~ • ! • L SA -- -- ; _ o ~ ~.. .~ o 0 o ~ 1 ~.I ,.. . ~ ~ -- -- -- ®® a ~ _ ~d ~~ x... Q ~- d I TM~ H~1 .. .. ~ ~ o ~oo~ ; _~ _ _ ~ o~ ____ txo ~amo~ 4 4 4 7 f II _ ~____________ I _______ _____________L ~ o:. ~~,.a OPf10NAL LOFT ~Zoll brothers DRC 2004-00067 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO UPSLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN ,voyoa f !lCONO FLOOR PLAN - DPANION COLONIAL CIRlIUOR souwee roorAOe ....o..,~ roe.. 51 omoNAL eoNUS Roots OPTIONAL PRINCE51 lOITE R% ~' 0_ `lo/I brothers L SA FIRBT FLOOR PLAN • SPANIRN COLONIAL lXTCRIOR ~J DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONG/ CAPISTRANO DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN ~~rovoa wuum rom~oe 56 # ~ ~ ~ow~ Foams OPTIONAL BOND! ROOM LSA ---- -- ~ ~ o 0 ,,. . ,,,,,.,, aenow ~° ~ i YfY~T ®® _____ _ •uTx -y ii ^^ ...., wu !. ~ • a® uenoo~: 3 uTx ~' . .. s wtn ~ ~ - ° _4 _ _~ aF.~.. --- ~o ..~ FOMOOY~ ~ I 0 ~___________ ___________ ____ _______~ _ 1 L RECOND PLOOR PLAN • DPANIEM COLONIAL EXTERIOR ~.. ~~,.. .x ~-n OPTIONAL LOFT moll brothers DRC 2004-00061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO T DOWN SLOPE SECOND FLOOR PLAN T 110tl04 WYAR! FOOTAO! TKm4.~ ,,,,.. 57 OPTIONAL PRINGEDB 8017E ~~ N_ ~Zoll brothers DRC 2004-00061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEL VERDE DOWN SLOPE FIRST FLOOR PLAN E1107100 ~~ FIRDT FLOOR PLAN • MANOR !7[T[RIOR EWMEPOOf~OE ~IY31 fLLL 2166 SQfI SCCML fLYM ]JB S¢~l mlr~ ~wL s~¢n 4MnGC 9W fl 62 ,, ~J L SA RECOND FLOOR PLAN -MANOR EILTERIOR i GZ'oll rothers RG-PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE 1NCH0 CUCAMONGA DEL VERDE DOWN SLOPE COND FLOOR PLAN ,,,Duos ~aune raauae rlPit Rml 2r66 SOLI sc~v Rm+ zvx sorl rvei .ao. '" m" 63 Z M 0 a a N y s 3 d tag ~ W s k a a ~~ o~ O Q W W -~ ~$ `~}~~~o6gu~QOa ,•~ w .~~a9~ ~ o = O m JZ ~ ac` E~3o u y - F d ~E3~`'~cg:: N W O Q d~ „kir ~„ ~ r o f=„ Z Q u ~ ~ ~ N ! a Z r ,. ~~--- ~~ 1 ~ i~. s~ 'b ~R A oo O ;, 00 ;p oo i . ^, ~^ ,. ~ o !~ i O W ~ o a ~ u ~~ I ----__-- !~! s 9 i~~~y~! ~~ ~~ ~~SB~'~ • CJ ~c~ m _~._.a. _a....~~--- --- ------------- ~_ s ~ .~ w .. _______r________. __i____. - w~ _s _____ ______ ____________ ___ . ~ i i TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES _ _ -v"v=:r J-Yr-v-vr~?w~v~erlYr `; ~ sy ~ `:n ~ ~'' i ; ~ ` oo.~rk F.wc- ~.r ore. i i ~ ~~ ~ .. d_____ un fl - e[ ovr~ ew ueeniw orwe RtO1R ELEVATON R~ ,LL DRC 200400061 f THE ENCLAVE moll brothers RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA ~~ UPSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION ....~,....,. ~.. ~~rovoa 4 4 ~~ W_ c s ,+ NlAR TYPIC4L ELEV4TION NOTES - ..~cw ...c .,.er.~..w. w.. ROOF PU1N DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE moll brothers SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION ~~roxros u 5 ~7 • ~~ u ~ Q O F ~ W z OC ~ o e ~>om Q oy s. ''%o qo~QO'dW~ >~y s ;eSa: : O= V m J W w .YLC en`s"`:~3 a N W O a d= f ....a ____^A Q y 4YU r a~ 0 0 ~~ 6 TTPIC4L ELE`J4TION NOTES L SA moll brothers ~~rowe 7 DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE TUSCAN ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION TOSG/1N' RIONT ELEVATION'7UDCAN' ao r .'~'s.T ~ rt N S y W 6 Z ~ ~ a ~ ~[~~' ~ d ~t~~~~~€~: a ~, ~ z o o ~ ~ °ga ~ W d a ~ q o Z v m W W ~=~ Z ' a c~~ ~ 7 F ti 't~ O ~' .~ a 0 C1~ `~ • L SA FRONT ELEVATION moll brothers TYPICAL ELE V~TIDN NOTES DRC 2004-00061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SANTA BARBARA UPSLOPE CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION ,vozoa 9 • 0 ZO ~; Y3 ~ q ° F ~ W Z S Q >80~~~~~~ ~~~ 'ga~d~ ~y'ys`=u'~~~~~~a. $z'myz Y 9 C as F :. N W V Q Q ~ ! a c ,., e, ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ v ;,$ c~ €: a`.o -, .. ~~ ______ __-_____ E2- n - i ~ i i i ~ 1 ~1 4 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ' e r rl ,~ ' \ ~ O ~ i _ i ~ ~ ___ 2 _ ~ O £ a ti W i6 dS r ~ f~~ u ' e r,i .. ~: F ii '~Xa~.z~~ ~ -8 ~~~ / t .. ri _~r}____9 ___________ w. ~ ? ~ ~ .b ~I 2 O i ~ ... 'o • ~ ~; , Q ~ I,~, `c~ ---------- ~ W i ~ Q ' o~0a y1 W a: .4 ~~ ~5a~d~ --' '- g~~acW ~ i -k_ gz~m~z Q .'~. ,e W Q .. zE ttW=f~~ .., --... e r 'r S, oe=uZ M --- .:. --- - e ~ oP °f=a ~ --- a------ ~ a° I ~ ~ } ~`~ Y Vii} ~, ~ `~xF~~Y ° ~ s ~ w, I ~~E~~~~ox$e~~~~ O ® Y =i~ ~ ~ a ~-~. pf.aFa 44 'y l ~g ® I I W r, !~ ~; II ,.- 1 O II I I ~ ~ ,;~ 1 ® „® C rr-- I t `q , I A______ 1 ~ '{L___ ____ 11~~ __ c 5rE FyI ~~ W y 1 ~~ a r~ ~ ,: ~: -~X~~s~--C ~-~-iii L~ ~---~D [~ x ~~ i 'a_ FRONT ELEVATION TYP104L ELE`/dTION NOTES ~~~~~ DRC 200400061 ` THE ENCLAVE pp~ moll brothers RANCHO CUCAMONGA ..<.,,.<.... ,.. SANTA BARBARA DOWN SLOPE MISSION ELEVATION ,voaros 18 o~ N w F O o$ 33oz§~ ~ W 2~ W F~ w ~..~~~ ~> o a d a w °~~" °' '' ° ~ a ~ O > e a ~~9~:9~'~' o Z v m Z W a r -.~.. _-. C W v ~ O~ of~QCy w ~ I '" 4 ~ e. § !, s ' I I ' ~ ~, ~__- ~, _ _______r L_~__(___~___(~ i ~ i i i i i i ~ '~('~{ ~ , ~ ~ ti=UUUU O -,. ~~N<,. ~ ~ 3~~: ~-- mfr rv .- <~ b - O - -~ o ~ ~-- o ~ >S -- ~ p• 5 ~ ;-"' 3~~ n J ~~~ ~ Bs i !i pi ~ ~: -~~Et3-s.~~s: T ~~ ~~ ~ i i ~~ O N U b ff N w O Z O ~ ~q ae~y Y ~~~~x odY~ ~... -- Q Z O og~ ~ oa g=y m "~ ~ z uWS Fa- 3p e~= a p~ M. ti '~ O 0 ~S T N oa y Z~ ~W W H ~a m ~°O 6 J > o C O = ~V a~oa~c~Wt1m Z W ° " ~ •?~~ ~ u W x F- ~ ~` a~ii€g^p O O O Z Fza -.... =_..A ~M a~ 0 ~q • 0 • ~ H J C~ \~ ~ ~ '~Y.k1'sT~S'Y'C ~-\3 N N C m r, ~ 's~ o se ~; ~ g ::°~ ,di u y3sa5~3~;€ a ~Ecs~ee:°: r Q c~ W = O ~ W Z o a~ m p F a ..~~ ~ e}V~ ° Zt7 Q m W Z J W o uWS c f,= ~ a 0 0 0 Q C w. ti N +~J 0 f ~! ~s ii ~~_\~~~ • ~ h J b w ~e D ? Y~ p E o Q ~_ 33~ J i~ 4Y~ u ~'~a°3gG' Y N ~Eaa~it~ qa Z ~ WZ6 ~m o~ 0 > H J °oZvm vW°xH ; ~ o F= a G Z ~~ ~ ti a~ 0 O • Q h J e~ N LJ u `~ ~~S a N ti a~ 0 O .~ h a ~X~~~C ~ 'F -\~~ Z o s~ r W 2~ W f z q s ~> O Q d Q o a;z 80 404 'Fmp~ F~ ~a. ~` ~~ dVvQMW w $~ „y~,~~~~,~~ s o Z~ m Z W ~i~'~3::egi3R Y O= Z Z O V - ~~~ ~ .., ~ q.~rl ~` i ~ r, ~= ~~ ~ 7 N N w 3 % Z o b a~ O o ~a. ae ~ m> Ca ~ ; w ~~.~`~5gE.~ SS~ f ~, O W w '~,~ 'pe"a}9 V V V Q ~~ ..~.=~'i~w~u ~. o Z 7 m W ~$" o v Z ~ ~E~~~3as4ixs;R~ V W= a 3 Z -..:... ~ ~ Z ~ Q oF~~~; ~~ ~ F' a €~3 iiL' dE' ~ta ti O 0 • m N N ~ Y z ~ Y i S ~_ a ~ ~rv~gs9~~a y kt2~~aa~gto.~5 F ~.... _____. Z ~ W Z m W F og~ o <6' g J > W °oZvm W W =f 3 ~ c~W oF=a D ~ W ~ 4 ` r ti a~ 0 8 e ~' -\a~ ~ • ~ h J ~~ ~_ TYPIC4L ELEYdTION NOTES O ~~ L SA `loll ~rotliers DRC 200400067 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE MISSION ELEVATION „mzw 32 s • • =1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ vk ~ ~ ' ~ i u F RIONT EIEVATON L S A moll brothers TYPIC4L ELEJ4TION NOTES DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCNO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE MISSION ELEVATION t vows 33 a ,, N_ TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES A ~'~oll brothers DRC 200400067 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE MISSION ELEVATION ++ro~ros 34 wCIUI CLCY/1TION ROOF PLAN N e~ • • ~~" ~>oo Wa y;' ~:3~ oWVd, MW t~~~ea~ecs§~~~ o = _ ~ Z ~E xa i.?~° F ~ C~ a~ 0 • ~ h a m M w ~. a 6 a"~o ~~i3 y 9E~~5 pp3d:C lg2t~ -....a ___..Ah ~ Z ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ° W Q d> o a N W v~ V W = a M W ~ ~ of;V ZZ w. G ti a~ 0 O .~ i C_J u Z~ ~ N P~ y FO oE• 4 Z aa~ S O ~ X~~ Y a a ~ a~=~a a . w ~ o~~~s~~ye~+ a y` 3~ yo L9 yF'~~ F Y~~9~aY~'t y~F3 ~' F -.~..a s. evc'-R z o o ~ ~ ° ~ m W Q d~ o a N W v ~ ~ W f~W= Q ~~ oFZ V z ti a~ ~' • Q h J W g V z W W f oC vm ~J V ~ Oa S V V ti a~ 0 0 • E c.~ J z 0 Q ~ W J J W ' ~ Q V ~" n b a aS3§; ~ ~ Ro ~yR~o~g`~~u 5 O ~... ___^_A 61 O \~ I1 "~1C~SBS-'~ ~ ZS t~ TYPICAL ELEVATION NOTES fit moll brothers DRC 200400067 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO GUCAMONGA CARLSBAD UPSLOPE TUSCAN ELEVATION „royoe 39 ~[sr [~cvwnox ~\~~~ p~ ~~ a ~, z o m9o ~g~ o a d a > o Z ~ J ~ W z 3 _ NWG ~ d = q ~=~ € o v ~ Q V g m F~ 6 ~ 7 F N V y° 0 8 g w .e,~za~al; F F _,..... ___~A ti a~ 0 0 i 0 a m a C~ '~yk~S6~sT 1st-Z,a' i _ a N ~ W ~O z l ~~ ro o~OQ ~~ fm 4 g S; a € $~ o Q ,~ ~ V7J ;` ~g~s°~ °~~g gx o W CtOL w2~,'-~~•~.~ oho. V W G~ F-"• - c_ c a R ~ fi F F A e a~ 0 z 0 a W J W a F W d O J M Z O O ~~ • e h r~ -~ I yy a W N a 6 0 0$ ~ Z o~ s°€ ~ m ~ ~ Wa w ~ ~ ~ E ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 y ~ ~ O Q ~ ' c~W=taiO~ ., ~ C=u pM ~ © _ ~ ~ i' ~ -. ,~s ~,~ ..~ ,~ ,; - Eva I ~ rE' ~o~ 4 ,' m - Y i ~M~JI ~ a --'-- V ~~ .o• ~ ~ B B Ifni S _ ~ lV i 0 -~ F a r iS, w ~s ~$ ~,i ! a ~., ~Y ~ .. ~ ..+' .. "s ~" ~O~ t~ U_ TYPiC4L ELEV4TiON NOTES ~.."cwe..~ a,.~~.,a. L S A moll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD DOWN SLOPE CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION tvoyoa 48 ROOF PLAN ~--(od {~1 N L S A L~ moll brothers ~J TYPiC4L ELEVATON NOTES DRC 200400061 f THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO UPSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL „roza 53 LEFT ELEVATION 7PANIbN COLONULL' RIOHT ELEVATION ^bPANIbN COLONIAL' f news eLevAnoM ,~ TYPIC4L ELEV4TION NOTES r~l `Toll brothers • DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO UPSLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ~ vowa i 54 HOOF PLAN ~X~~~~~ 1~ -~y'~ y n_ e `y~ o ~~~~Fi~¢~~ S 0 0 0 N O z 0 a Q W zOW~ a~~a ~' z vHZ O o d;~ Qz v OV C = G ~1 Z W W f Q d a~ 0 0 C h J N t TYPIC4L ELE`l4TION NOTES rrl moll brothers DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANGNO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO DOWN SLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION woyoe 59 i Leer eLevanoN -sPAx1aN COLONIAL- R1611T ELEVATON'BPAN18N COLONIAL' s ~,~ ~_ TYPIC4L ELEV4TION NOTES RmO~P PLAN DRC 200400067 # THE ENCLAVE moll brothers RANCNO CUCAMONGA ~~ CAPISTRANO DOWN SLOPE SPANISH COLONIAL ELEVATION •..•,,..,... ,.. ,vovw 60 RlAR lLCVATION a s ~ a z w a. ~ ~ o o~ ~~~ oo~a~°>X ~,~, 1~ tti ' i w a ~a-'v" ~ °o Z V ~ Z {J11 2 ` F `~ ~ c~~y'~.~sc".~Ct W~ W 3~ ~ ~t,(~ ,F~~~~ a F F ~ ~ 2~ .~, f ~s, ;, ~ ~ ~ D `~ ~ ~O §" '' - a~r f d ~~~ 1 ' < 00~ ~ O ~ 00 ! O ~', F ,1,\ ` [y,~k °' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~-- ` ~` ~~~`~ „~ ~„ °1~ .. =1 x.15 u /a--(O K N 10 a ~ z o m~ p W W goqg~o~ H a oV~WJ W y z N W O J= -~ W V W=W~i OC °F-Z~C z ~ 4. ~ ti '~ O 0 ~~ ~ 9 ~~kc3g t~~~~~~3~U~ i ~--6q ~i~ i~ TYPIC4L ELEVATION NOTES 2011 brothers r~~ • i ~r-.. ,~ ROOF PLAN DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEL VERDE DOWN SLOPE MANOR ELEVATION ~voyoq sg • RFJ~R ELEVATION ti m ~~ z r; ~ ~ ~ g - ~WZ Wa o v .fi $ z s t o~ O W d W ~ .~~.. t. . g~c o o~ ~tl~~~ ~ ~ a q a} V W M W ?~ $ ~ ~E $ g a~6 ~ ° SW 3~ : I~W F INi ti a~ 0 0 h J `_~ ~\TT ~ ~ ~ 1 ~' so c ~~ E~ E'. z W 0 m ` j p W d W q°o a e d V~ D W O W W oZtt 9 Z 5 Z 2 a t1WS o = W 0 ; p ~ F F W V ti a~ 0 ~ • 0 i F P ~ v O y z e~ s8 a o f ~ a e j g~8~~~~- ~a~ _~i a c t' 9 o Y 4} 4 Y a~ L r ~E~'3~~n:m;a. r- -..~.. _; Air r~.. ~: ~--7a as 1r1, u ~~ra~T F ; ~ o a ~ ~ % _: e ~~ s ~ w y ` $~iro F .~ _ _ _ e R~ f~FR z 0 a ~>o W F > °o ~ ~ p C W qq dC1vW ~ N W t~ °oZt Z Z ~ ' t1WSW O O ; Q ~ F Q f C ~, V ti a~ 0 ti ~' . e h N r Q ~~O Q °og a ~ d~ & -- --- o Z u m J C N W a ~ J ~~~ t1WS ~~ ~~ oFZ a q~ ~ ~ f6 <L\~ \\ V`\\o \\\~ b ~____________________ ~V ~~~ _~ ~ ~\~~ V~ ~ ~~ = AFB , ~` ~' -I€ ~~~~' ~~ .o-.ac ~ ~~ J :~~ ' ~ ~~~wl . ~ ~ ~~; ,`~, ~ ~; i \\ N ~~_\\ I I m 'o ? N ~~~ O i \~ ~~ • a ~ : A\V` ~~. ~~T' ~~ ~` ,~~ ~~. &_____ a ° ~ ~ ~ W ~- ~--- o=~ W jr ace N W O ~ 4, J ~H~ O ~ _ ~ 7 f`~ II~i 4 N VA ,~ ', .a-,a -~ \ ~ ~ ~~~'~ ~ ~ O \~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ 3 e ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~. ~~ ~ ~ O .,~~\ ~~ ~~~~__~ - V ~~A~~~~~~A\, n 3 ~- . ~ e~ o ~ ° a &-~---- ~ g ~ m W V ~ ~ g °oZu m O~ ° ~~~ vW= Q dJ O== Z' ~~ ~ C ~ 6 '`L ~ Y r ~~~ ~\\\ \~~~~~ ~ \ ._~ _ Ni \\\~\ \ ~ a, \'vJ ,~ , \~ ~ ~; o \ ,~ ~ \ ~} ~ ~ i i \.. w _ ___ ~ ~; i \~ \ y ~ O s~ \ ~ \ Q ~~;~,~ ~~ .. ~,\~ .o_;~ m o N K F \___ Z O K ~~ ~ ~ i ~X~'s~s`~ ~ Z~ lJ f~---'76 I N a a c~ m>~ o & -- --- °o ~ < m d a °o Z ~ J J H ~~ C1W= QdJ •. O=_ ~' F ., `~`JI~, ~ ~ f o \~ \\\\ \\N~~ .\~\~Rjsi~ \\\ __ ~____ \~~,) ~ ~ ~~ V ~~ .o-,oc ~,~y ! i ~~ .~ ~ ~v~ ~~~°~` ~ 0 ,~~~ ~~ I y ~ \\ \\ ~ .0., ~ _ ~' I ~ ,ig ~ ~~ ~, ,, ~ I \\\ F\~~ I V ~,~ 0 ~~. ~\~ O &_______________~~.1 ~ \ \ \~~ Z I \\ \`\\\\\\\\ `~~ W ~~~~ N W F .0-,51 y f J O N S ~- a C F 3 _ I O 2 i ~~ iJ ~x,~-~~ss-~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ a m>o °o~~ m W ~ V ~ d 1p N W J O ~=v a F d ~ orz a y \~~` .~~~~> ~~~ ~ I \~. ... ~~~ \" ~~~ N a~ ~O o U WN C N O N i I \~ ~l r a m > o ° ~ f ~ W ~-- °o Q Q d _ dt>; yOFB _ °oWV Jyp ~ tiles O Z ~' J F w $6 ""' a ~Y c` I~ .~~\ \~A o \ \\\\\ \T\~~\\~\ h - i \~ \lal\' _ \\\i ~______ o \~~\,~ i , :~\\ \ ~, f ~ ..~, ~ i .~\~\ \; ~ ;\` \\ ~' I i~~ \\ ° ;~ ~ o ~ ~ \; i ~~ . \; ~~ .~ ~v~:.vv y v . ~ N F m y ~~ ~ •\ ~~~~ W J \\\\\\ ~\ ~\\ W \ \v \~ _ m 0 3 2 ~~ p C~-S o~~ gZ W Z ~ F J O NWC NUJ. O = Z V F- ~~~~ ~~ ,o-. ., •~ ~~ -~x~.esz-~ G-co ~~~`\\ :\~~~~~: ~\.~~ N \\\ ~ .O~,OE MI \~~ N ~~ ~,~ E i :~~~; \~~ s ~, ~~~ ~` / \'; i ~~ ~.. ~. o ~~~~ , .~ ,~ ~, 3 ~- a~ ~ ~ 0 ~• T ~~ \\, \~. \~ \~ ~~ ~\ .\`\\\\\ \ \ __~_____ ~~ ~~ S ~ ~ ~ ,9-,bL \\~ ~ ~~~~ \ \ \\ j ~ ~ ~ ~~ \` ~~J \ \ \ \ ~ ~Q ~ ~\'' y ~\~LL .~` v ~~\ V~i \~\\ ~ \\\i Q W ~ ~\~`\~ :~ . ~~ ~ \ o ~ f g ; m a W ~~~ Z N W T a J = ~ d ~ Z ~, o z w N a~ O m K • e h J, // ~-------------6 . ~`: ~~ ~~ , .A~~ ~ . w .~~ ~~~( y ~ ~ `;1 :~~~~ ~~.y t p.~ .~ ,\`VV9f-I--- ~~` a .,; \~. ..,. ';,:•. ~~ . ~. ~ \ 9 d' N W 3 0 ti a m90 W d °o~a ~ j01 o V~ rWV W J H H~ Z~'• V W = W 3 o== F ~ C w e ti '~ O y ~~-c ~' ~ , n N ~ ~ O Q d °o~~ m ~O o Z~ m y F O , O=v = O ~ ~ ~ 4 S ~ ~; ~\ ~\~~~ ,~~, `~' . ~~ a-,o~ ~ \\ \~! ~ V V~' \~~ i \~ I ~' B \~ ~ ,.~ - \\. ~~\ ~ ~.,o- '~ O 0 s J u l J t~ __ - - -- ,~ P_ .._ - ~- -;~ EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (T7-T1) LOT 11 ~ i /~i I_ ___ _ ~i , l G _ ___ _ _ __ _~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ /~~ ~ ~ -_ ~ ~ i 1919 0 FC NoaTTI / souTN sITE secnoN DRC 200400061 Lon1 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA moll brothers DOWN SLOPE pp1 LOT 11 ....~,..,... ,.. ,I~rox/oa 71 • • • N °o~~ m0 N oZv m~~ Zp ~Wx fC, N~~ = v Z a 3 ,:..~.~ .~;; ,,~ V~~ --'~~s_~, ~.~`' ~ s 4~ '~' ' ~ ~~~~~ 9 ~ '; :~ ;~„ ~,~; 3 n z V~~: ' ~'~ EI ., ~ ~ ~ - G \ ~ a 9 w \\i ~~~~~~V~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~1 _ O J ~ d ~~ \ a/v_^ f 2 f6~ Z ~~ F 1i U m W / N f 1 N Z 2 ~ ~_ N N &_ _~' M1' r Z O r 1~ 1~ ~ D~ v a e`Wjp W o ~ O d e+> g=am ~N~o NWO d.Z j: vWI a~' IIr C=Z V ~ \ ~ZI __~ r K P_ 5 ~~ ~\\ \ ,0-,SI, ~~~ ~ .o-,oe ' ~~~ ~ `~ - \~ ~~ ~~~ - ~ i ~ .~,' 4v \~~ ~ ' O i \:, ~~~ ( I I ^~ ~\ ; _ LL ~, ~~,, ,, f C .o si --_- ,--- - \. \ o~ s ~ f~ 6 2 ~ O r U O Wy ~ O W m LL N J N 2 S ~ F ~ Z O ~ ~S ~'~CP V ' ~_ ,i u ~~ EAST /WEST SITE SECTION (E1-E1) LOT 74 L S A i /.~ i iii /_~L ~, „~ e_ L~ ~ /~ / ~ ~ ~// i %i it ~/ /i :... ,fie vx ~ j ~ ,~ -sr.~- ~ ~. i / R ry~Z Qom. 29.A1/N 1917 5 ~,Pi%% FC NORTH I SOUTH SITE 9ECTION LOT 74 moll brothers R/w DRC 200400061 THE ENCLAVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPISTRANO DOWN SLOPE LOT 14 ~~rozos 61 N ~ e ~ O d G ~ ~ m O N ~ V ~ Z Q m ~ F Z J = = Z C O ~ ~ (~ ti a~ 0 ~" ~ z ~ U N o~ n l WW C ~ ~ ) Z v1 I 2 F N ~ O ~ __~6 Z • ~ h a • L u . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.20 p m Donald Granger October 19, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of bwldmg elevations and detailed site plan for 15single-family lots on 9.23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-02. Related Files• Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Minor Exception DRC2004-00662 I Design Parameters The protect site has a final map (SUBTT16262) and has been graded, and Alexis Avenue has been paved The site is bounded on the east by Archibald Avenue, to the south by the historic landmark Demens-Tolstoy Ranch House and an approved 11-lot single-family subdivision, to the west by vacant land, and to the north by existing single-family houses All properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). The proposed protect consists of four floor plans that range in square footage from 4,466 square feet to 5,864 square feet. Architectural styles include Spanish Colonal, Tuscan, Craftsmen, Mission, and Manor The protect site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which regwres architectural design techniques that minimize the amount of grading and allow the house to follow the natural grades The protect has been designed so that all floor plans have stepped pads, with elevation changes ranging from a minimum of 3 feet to a maximum 5 8 feet, thereby, meeting the design goals of the Hillside Overlay District. All plans have variation in the footprints and articulation in the wall planes, thereby avoiding "box on box" building forms. All plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong variation, and are within the 30-foot high bwldmg envelope regwrement All horse corrals meet the 70-foot radws regwrement from all adtacent dwelling units, and the Community Trail on Archibald Avenue will be regwred to be installed with the proposed protect Background The Design Review Committee reviewed the protect at its September 14, 2004, meeting and did not approve the protect The Committee directed the applicant to revise the plans and to work with staff on the following Malor Issue• The Committee indicated that additional enhancement to the side and rear elevations would be regwred in order to meet the 360-degree architectural regwrement The Committee directed the applicant to add substantial amounts of architectural elements to the side and rear elevations, including, but not limited to, divided light windows, recesses, decoratve wrought ucn accents, corbels, potshelfs, Craftsman style windows, shutters, and arched windows as appropriate to each architectural style. The applicant has made substantial enhancements to the side and rear elevations of all plans The applicant has added the following architectural elements where appropriate to the selected architectural style (e g Spanish Colonial, Craftsman, etc.) divided light windows, shutters, base treatment with battered cap, stucco recesses with wrought iron accents, faux wrought iron balconies, arched windows with decorative sills and surrounds, wood siding to wall planes, and stone or siding to chimneys Staff is pleased with the enhancements and is of the opinion that no other modifications are necessary the meet the 360-degree architectural regwrement. Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion A n ~X~xs~~ ~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS, INC October 19, 2004 Page 2 Major Issues: There are no major issues The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all motor issues Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues There are no secondary issues Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1. All interior private yard slopes are regwred to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 2 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used. Stone veneers are not permitted 3 Provide decorative pavement on driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdiwsion. 4. No wood fencing is allowed Construct block walls between homes (i a along interior side and rear property line) for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 6 Taper three or four-car driveways down to standard two-car width at the street. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission Desion Review Committee Action Members Present. Buller, Fletcher, McPhail Staff Planner Donald Granger At the September 14, 2004, Design Rewew Committee (DRC) meeting, the Committee indicated that substantial enhancement to the side and rear elevations would be regwred in order to meetthe 360-degree architectural regwrement At the October 19, 2004, DRC meeting, staff presented revised drawings which satisfied the Motor issues the Committee raised at its September 14, 2004, meeting The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval ~-"1 Q Ms Meier stated that the wail decreases in height as you approach Miller Avenue to about a 6-foot height Chairman McNiel asked Mr Chambers if that is correct Mr Chambers stated that is his understanding Ms Gallegos stated that she lives on the end of Miller Avenue adjacent to the freeway She asked if it is a 6-foot wall is at the top of the slope at the same level of the freeway Mr Buller clanfied that this applicant would not be regwred to place a wall between her property and the Caltrans nght of way property He stated that the wall would be bwlt at the applicant's most westerly property line He asked Ms Meier to show Ms Gallegos her property on the map to clanty the placement of the wall in relation to her property He stated that the applicant's wall would be to the east of her property and not to the north. Chairman McNiel clarified that her property is not contiguous to the applicants' development Ms Meier indicated on the map that her property is one of three existing residences that face Miller where Etiwanda Avenue meets the freeway Ms Meier clarified that if they are correct in identifying her property on the map, the wall would not come down to her north property line, but would run along the west property boundary Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing Motion Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00689 and Variance DRC2001-00758 Motion carved by the following vote• AYES. MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES NONE ABSENT: NONE .:... D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRADEVELOPMENT CO -The design rewew of house elevations and detailed site plans for 15 lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN. 1061-561-02 -Related files' Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00585. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262-PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to subdivide 9.23 acres of land into 15 single family lots in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061- 561-02 Related files Development Review DRC2001-00584 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00585 -Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration 1~ Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that he must abstain from hearing Items D and H and therefore excused himself from the Council Chambers at 8 02 p m Planning Commission Minutes -7~~I January 9, 2002 ,~ Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report He explained that staff believes this protect fulfills the intent of the Hillside Residential Development Standards in that the homes embrace the contours of the hillsides as single-story designs and then become 2-story designs as they follow the slope of the hillside below and that each home is unique in design with no reverses He noted that the resolution has a revision on Page 104 of the agenda packet and that copies of the changes are in front of the Commissioners Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing Bill DeCasas, Piedra Development Company, 851 Calle Serra, San Dimas, thanked Mr Bullerand Mr W arren for their help in meeting their time lines during the development process. He noted that they had worked hard to present designs that are not "boxy " Commissioner Mannerino asked if the issue regarding access to the trail for the one homeowner has been resolved Mr. DeCasas stated that their legal counsel has indicated that allowing a neighboring property owner to access private property may expose their homebuyers to liability, and therefore, even though they would like to resolve the issue, they feel they cannot resolve it. Commissioner Mannenno clarified that it is only one homeowner that is affected Mr DeCasas stated that is correct, it is Mr. Pearson. Dan Pearson, 9639 W hirlaway, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he is the affected homeowner and he also sent a letter regarding the trail access issue He explained that they have owned a horse for 15 years and to place a permanent fence barring access to the trail would make it impossible to keep the horse and devalue their property He asked that he retain access to the trail He also asked that his view not be obstructed by the construction of the new homes and also requested that tall trees or potential tall growing trees not be planted. AI Silva, 9577 W hirlaway Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he lives behind Lot 8 at the end of the street and would like access to the trail He added that he has an easement for an alley and a horse trail He thought because of his location at the end of the street, he may not have any problems, but he would like the easement removed Brad Buller, City Planner asked that Exhibits D & H-15 be displayed to clarify the location of his property. Mr Buller asked where the trail access has been blocked Mr. Pearson said that all of the homes in the area indicated have been blocked from the trail because the existing homeowners have erected fences, outbwldings, and tennis courts He commented that he did not feel he is in a position to ask his neighbors to remove the obstructions. He added that if the developer is willing to put up an access gate that should be easy enough to accomplish Mr Silva indicated that because he is at the end of the street, access should not be a problem Charlene Anza, 8435 Pumalo Street, stated that she is a member of the Alta Loma Riding Club She thanked the Commissioners for ensuring that we maintain our equestrian heritage She asked that when considering future development, that heritage continue to be maintained. Mr Buller stated that staff is fully in favor of the applicant making every effort to allow equestrian access to the local trail that will run east and west He commented that before legal counsel Planning Commission Minutes ~~ January 9, 2002 '~X~'sg~rt•"s 1,~ determines issues of liability, that staff be given a chance to resolve the issue of access He asked if there are conditions in the resolution about access S Mr. Warren stated that there is not a condition at this time He explained that what is being proposed and what staff is supporting is that the perimeter tract wall be located on the inside of the easement line The fence that the owners are concerned about is a 2-rail trail fence Staff's position is that if the homeowner wants to put m a gate for access, and the developer agrees, they would support that Chavman McNiel clarified that the issue is only the white 2-rail trail fencing that borders the trail Mr Warren stated that staff is not opposed to either a gate or a removable section of fence being placed for the homeowner's access as long as the design conf//orms Chairman McNiel stated that he believes the developer would be willing to do that Mr DeCasas stated that it is not a public easement, but is an easement belonging to the tract, but he does not have a problem with providing the gate with ratling He stated he believes something can be worked out, but could not determine exactly what it would look like Mr Buller suggested the City Attorney be asked if minute action for this discussion is acceptable to require the applicant to make every effort possible to provde access or if a condition could be added to the prolect whether it be for this one homeowner or future homeowners to have equestrian access Kevin Enms, Assistant City Attorney, asked if the applicant has actually agreed to this Chairman McNiel replied that the applicant gave non-specific agreement in that he does not have a design for a gate or opening, but that he concurs that an opening m the fence will be created at his expense and that the gate to the homeowner's property will be provided by the homeowner, outside of his tract Mr DeCasas stated that is correct He reiterated that if he does provide access, he may have a possible problem with any new buyer he sells to. Commissioner Mannerino asked Mr. Ennis if the Commission could approve the prolect reserving the issue of bridle trail access and if this issue cannot be resolved, it be brought back before the Commission Mr. Ennis stated that it could and that the Commission could also impose an additional provision on the approval that states that the applicant is to work with staff to resolve the issue and that if it cannot be accomplished, that the issue be brought back before the Commission for further review Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, offered clarification regarding the use of the easement for the homeowners located to the north of the prolect Mr Coleman stated that according to the California Vehicle Code and the Rancho Cucamonga codes, the easement is not for vehicles, construction deliveries or RV use, it is strictly for horse access to the trail and for vehicles for deliveries related to horses and the medical treatment of horses Cheryl Pearson, 9639 Whirlaway Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that she is the owner of the horse m question She thanked the developer for his willingness to work with them towards trail . access She stated that when they purchased their property, they were informed that they were required to maintain the trail. She noted that none of their neighbors complied She added that when they put in their back fence, they allowed easement to the trail for equestrian access to the Planning Commission Minutes ,; 9-„~ January 9, 2002 trail She asked for clarification regarding public access to the trails for people on horseback so that they would not have to be on the streets Mr Buller clarified by stating that the local trails are for the purpose for lots that abut the trail to get access to the community trails He said that every tract has its own trail for its own lots within their tract and that is why they are called prwate trails for that tract Chavman McNiel asked when her home was built Mrs Pearson stated in 1978 Chairman McNiel responded that about that time, Rancho Cucamonga incorporated as a City and therefore her home was probably developed under county guidelines. He indicated that they designed the tract with horse trails and sold them as horse property but never dedicated the trails and that is why people bwlt structures, tennis courts, etc on them and the City could not do anything about it He added that the City is now limited as to what they can do to rectify the situation because they were not dedicated trails. Now the trails are dedicated and are kept unobstructed Mrs Pearson asked if it would be possible, she would compromise by giving up her easement so that the new trail could come onto her property. Chairman McNiel stated he did not believe that would be possible. Mr. Buller commented that this Commission is strongly in favor of her gaming access to the trail and that if that cannot be accomplished, the issue is to be brought back to the Commission He commented that every attempt would be made to resolve the issue, and based upon Mr. Ennis' remarks, a condition can be added to the resolution Chairman McNiel concurred that they would do whatever they can to ensure horse access to the trail from her property. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing Mr. Ennis clarified the issue by referring to the resolution on page D-126 of the agenda packet He stated that the new condition should be worded as follows The applicant shall work with staff to facilitate a mutual agreement between the applicant and the abutting property owners to the north for access to the private trail and dsuch an agreement cannot be reached, the item will be referred back the Planning Commission for further review. Commissioner Mannerino stated that with the added condition he would make a motion to approve Chairman McNiei commented that this protect is gwte unique and that Mr Warren was very exerted with the design of the homes He complimented the developer for then hard work on the protect and stated that we will be proud of these homes when they are bwlt Commissioner Stewart added that she is excited to see that it is the first protect that meets the new equestrian setbacks and is pleased that it is a quality protect Motion. Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias to adopt the Resolution of Approval for SUBTT16262 and to issue a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts with the added condition stated above. Motion carved by the following vote •• n • • Planning Commission Minutes „-1 q;~ January 9, 2002 r~ U City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Development Review DRC2004-00061 2. Related Files: Tract Map 16262 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061 - TOLL BROTHERS, INC -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 15 single-family lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-02 Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592 On January 9, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration The 9 23-acre site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Hillside Road The proposed Development Review is for the design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for a previously recorded tract map (SUBTT16262) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on January 9, 2002, for the 15-lot subdivision (SUBTT16262) The proposed Development Review will not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration No new environmental information has been presented that would raise or create new or adverse impacts not already considered in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Toll Brothers, Inc 13157 Mueller Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 9 23-acre site has been mass graded for Tract 16262, a previously approved 15-lot subdivision The site is bounded on the east by Archibald Avenue, to the south by a proposed subdivision (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16592), to the west by future Tolstoy Ranch Road, and to the north by an existing single-family neighborhood Initial Study for Development Review DRC2004-00061 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None DETERMINATION On the basis of this irntial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect Signed ~~~ ~ "'°""Y`- Donald Granger Assistant Planner May 11, 2004 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the t~enng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 Mitigated Negative Declaration (/) Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 Mitigation Monitoring Program • ~~`~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2004-00061 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur r ~_%^y Sgnature ~~.~-~ Date Print Name and Title ~ ~' S /t awe ^~ ~~ i RESOLUTION NO 04-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 15 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES FOR TRACT MAP 16262 IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 1061-561- 02 ,. A Recitals 1 Toll Brothers, Inc filed an application for Development Rewew DRC2004-00061, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Development - Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth ~n the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located west of Archibald Avenue and north of Hillside Road, with a street frontage of approximately 472 feet on Archibald Avenue, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is developed with single-family dwelling units and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the south has an approved tentative map (SUBTT16262) and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the east is developed with single-family dwelling units and is zoned Very Low Residential, and the property to the west is vacant land and is zoned Very Low Residential, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viamty, and d The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain their feedback, and . e The protect design meets or exceeds the Very Low Residential Distnct Basic Development Standards, and ~~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-119 DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 ' Page 2 f The design of the single-family houses accomplishes 360-degree architectural treatment by the application of complementary primary and secondary materials and architectural elements to all sides of the dwelling units, therefore, the architectural design of the protect meets the design goals of the General Plan and Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds and conGudes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed desigri ~s in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vnll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mlunous to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 A Mitigated Negative Decaration was adopted on January 9, 2002, for Tract SUBTT16262 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental • review or Mitigated Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration Based upon the facts and mforrnation contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral n;ports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that requre ma~orrevisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the arcumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require mayor revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase m the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted that shows any of the following 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed m the Negative Declaration, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, . but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative ~!~ O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-119 DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS • December 8, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Where slope conditions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow accessonto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading permits 2) The plans submitted for plan check shall be consistent v~nth plans on file with the Planning Department as approved by the Design Review Committee on October 19, 2004 3) The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall indicate the matenal used for the access steps leading to the corral area on each lot Final design and matenals used for the access steps shall be subject to City Planner review and approval 4) Feeder Trail, 20-foot to 15-foot Transition Vehicle Gate with Gty Standard "Unauthonzed Vehicles Prohibited" signs, and side step-through for horse access shall be installed at each local trail access point on Tolstoy Ranch Road and Archibald Avenue, per City Standard Drawing No 1006-B 5) A 5-foot, double solid non-wood gate (10-foot total width) shall be installed at each trail access location to the horse corral area 6) Trail improvements shall be installed per City Standard Dravnng No 1003 (Side Area Parkways) for the Commumty Trail on Archibald Avenue 7) A 6-foot high split-face wall shall be constructed with nver rock plasters along the east property lines of Lots 1 and 15 adjacent to the Commumty Tral along Archibald Avenue, and along the west property Imes of Lots 8 and 9 faGng Tolstoy Ranch Road The plasters shall be placed at the rear comer of each lot Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 8) Provide decoratrve penmeter fencing (i a ,masonry) attract edges and along streets "Decorative" means stucco finish, split-faced block, or simlar textured surface with native stone plasters and a cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable 9) Retaining walls exposed to public view are to be decoratve masonry 10) Retum walls and comer sidewalls are to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style If more than one style of house design exists, then a simple wall design is preferred ~-~a ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-119 DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 Page 4 11) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 12) Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a matenal more durable than wood gates Acceptable matenals include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and plastic 13) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real, or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 14) All intenor side and rear walls shall be of block matenal 15) The developer shall process a request with the Planning Department to change the name of the local street (Alexis Avenue) for Tract 16262 Engineenng Department 1) All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No 02-05 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 shall apply 2) The developer shall process a certificate of compliance with the Engmeenng Department to change the name of the local street (Alexis Avenue) for Tract 16262 Environmental Mitigation 1) The applicant shall implement all mitigation measures adopted for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 on January 9, 2002, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No 02-05 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ~--~oa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-119 DRC2004-00061 -TOLL BROTHERS December 8, 2004 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS J i ~--l03 ~h~! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00061 I SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 15 LOTS APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC LOCATION: APN 1061-561-02 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-119, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire If building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~--r~xf Com lehon Da / / / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2004-00067 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated far consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the DevelopmerN Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 10 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in contunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rad, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be regwred by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate Penang 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' assoaations for amendments to the CC&Rs 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Assoaation are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the Comolehon Date / / I I -/-/- I / / / / I I I -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~}--~o~ Project No DRC2004-00061 Comolehon Date D. E. City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permds 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoinmg property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, ail contiguous property owner at feast 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 15 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and fear properly lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 16 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 17 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 18 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot walllfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 19 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier to accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods ~-~v ~ 3 / / I I -/-/- -/-/- -/-/T / / i l / / / / / / / / / I Protect No DRC2004-00061 Comole6on Date 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or mare in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Diwsion 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit H. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits / / / / / / / / I / / / -/-/- / / / / ~_I on 4 Project No DRC2004-00061 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a SitelPlot Pian, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, r e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00061#) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Budding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00061) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Diwsion prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays Comolehon Date I I I / _/_l~ / I / / / / / I / / / /_ -- ~0 g Protect No DRC2004-00061 Comolehon Date ~K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _I_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Caltfornia Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _I_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the _I_/_ standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17 24 070 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for _/_!_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLI ANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. De dication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 52 total feet on Archibald Avenue _/-/- 40 total feet on Klusman Avenue _/_/- 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map ~-~da s Prgect No DRC2004-00061 ComoleLOn Date N. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, dove approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Cdy Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred /_/~ / / / / / / I / / / / / /- / / / / / / / / I ~~ 10 Protect No DRC2004-00061 ComoleGOn Date O. Public Maintenance Areas ~ 1 A signed consent and waiver form to /oin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respecttve _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue P. Drainage and Flood Control 1 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed _/_/_ from the pro/ect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _I_/_ property from ad/scent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overtlows in the event of a blockage in a _/_I_ sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls ~. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_I_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_I_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection DisVict, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be sub/ect to any requirements that may be received from them R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved ~ I~I Protect No DRC2004-00061 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors -/_/- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _I_I_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolitng doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ T. Windows ~ 1 All sltding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _I_I_ from frame or track to any manner U. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ wsibdity APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~J ~--ria • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS December 1, 2004 Enclave Madand Hank SFR Tract DRC2004-00061 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APP~:Y TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply "~" 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500- feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250- feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200- feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. ' 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow t. The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provde the required fire flow subject to Fire Distract review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 Caldorma Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). • 2. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. ~--//3 FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property bne; or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owners association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shal- include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, tum radii and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall wmply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Provide service to adjacent properties; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Frre Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemardino. noloQical Summary of RCFPD PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water mairi~system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is require pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-sit combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD ~~~Y 6. Fire Alarm System. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 7. Access Control Gates: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. ~~~ 9. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-itch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercialhndustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated dunng periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation • numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all sudes. 11. Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Diwsion. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction, Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. i 5~~ `~~~ T H E C I T Y O F ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report. DATE December 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 - CECIL R CARNEY - A request to subdivide 1 48 acre Into 3 parcels for Industrial purposes in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue - APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00564 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00564 - CECIL R CARNEY -The development of 3 industrial buildings totaling 15,501 square feet on 1 48 acre of land In the Industrial Park District `(Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue - APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 A Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant (Approved Entitlement fora 5-Building Industnal Project), General Industrial (Subarea 13) South - I-15 Freeway and 4th Street off-ramp East - I-15 Freeway West - Industrial Development, Industrial Park (Subarea 12) and General Industrial (Subarea 13) B General Plan Designations Project Slte - Industrial Park North - Generallndustrial South - I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway West - General Industrial and Industrial Park ITEMS "B" & "E" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S U BT P M 16714/D R C2004-00564 December 8, 2004 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The protect site is located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue Historically the project site was used for vineyards, but now is primarily comprised of invasive, weedy vegetation The site slopes southerly at approximately 1 5 percent and has previously been disced for weed abatement purposes The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, to the north, five industrial buildings, which have an approved land use entitlement that are in plan check review, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street off-ramp to the „south The I-15 Freeway is approximately 6 feet higher than the site Access into the site is from Charles Smith Avenue D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Souare Footage Ratio Required Provided Building A Office 4,664 sq ft 1/250 19 spaces Warehouse 1,555 sq ft 1/1000 2 spaces 21 spaces 23 spaces Budding B Office 4,055 sq ft 1/250 16 spaces Warehouse 1,352 sq ft 1/1000 1 spaces 17 spaces 20 spaces Budding C Office 2,906 sq ft. 1/250 12 spaces Warehouse 969 sq ft 1/1000 1 spaces 13 spaces 15 spaces Total 15,501 sq. ft. 51 spaces 58 spaces ANALYSIS A General In contunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel map to subdivide 1 48 acre of land into three separate parcels and develop three industrial buldings The buildings are proposed on Parcels 1 through 3 and range from 3,875 to 6,219 square feet in size Since the protect site is master planned, the Development Code gives the Planning Commission the authority to allow the creation of parcels that are less than the standard regwrement of a 1-acre minimum Ail three bwldings will share access from one driveway on Charles Smith Avenue, and atl three buildings are designed with separate parking and loading areas The loading areas are on the south side of each bwlding away from public view All bwidings have strong vertical articulation The buildings are constructed of painted tilt-up concrete with sandblasting incorporated as a second primary material The sandblasting is primarily used as an accent material on recessed areas (above and/or below reflective or spandrel glass) Other architectural elements on the buildings include reflective and spandrel glass and metal canopies at the north and west elevations All buildings have recessed window bays and columns that will provide shadow ~,~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S U BTP M 16714/D RC2004-00564 December 8, 2004 Page 3 The protect is located next to the I-15 Freeway where it is highly visibly from public view As a result, the buildings have been designed so that all roof-mounted equipment is completely screened from the elevated freeway by the parapet (Exhibit "F-1") Because of the location of the protect, landscaping within the freeway right-of-way or an m-lieu of construction cash deposit for future development will be required B Design Review Committee The Design Rwiew Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, Buller) reviewed the protect on October 19, 2004 At the meeting, the Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval, subtect to the folla~ing condifions 1) on Bwldings A, B, and C, the tower element shall include a decorative cornce, and the wall planes at the tower element shall have reveals in a block pattern, and 2) the existing chain link fence on the east property line shall be replaced with a wrought iron fence, thereby, providing continuity of fencing materials with the existing wrought fence along the west property line The developer shall have the option to use a concrete tilt-up wall, or a combination of wrought iron fence and tilt-up wall The final design of the cornice, wall/fence, spacing, and materials will be subtect to City Planner review and approval during plan check The applicant has revised the building elevations to incorporate the Committee's conditions of approval (Exhibit "F"). All conditions have been included in the attached resolution of approval . C. Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on October 19, 2004, and recommended approval D Technical Review Committee The Technical Committee reviewed the protect on October 19, 2004, and recommended approval. , E Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant Staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Umt for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997 In October 2003, Compliance Biology performed aHabitat-Based Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the DSF The report also evaluated the project site for habitat suitability and evidence of additional special-status wildlife species known from the area Results of the survey indicated that the project site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF because of 1) presence of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) primary historical use of the site in grape cultivation, 3) there is no apparent connectivity to the subtect site from the nearest known DSF population, 4) no DSF have been observed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 5) the site is isolated from undisturbed or natural habitats These disturbance-related factors collectively contribute to reduce the occurrence potential of DSF Based on the conclusions of the habitat suitability evaluation as summarized above, the • occurrence potential of DSF is considered to be low and the subtect site does not support optimal DSF habitat Long-standing surface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development activities, have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Also, the subject site would not likely be considered an essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding ~~E 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SU BTPM 16714/DRC2004-00564 December 8, 2004 Page 4 commeraal and office developments, and overall absence of swtable habitat on or adtacent to the site Staff concluded that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to aless-than-significant level. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Bra Bu City Planner BB DG\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Photo Exhibit "B" - Sde Uhhzation Map ~ Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan with Sections Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Tentative Parcel Map for SUBTPM16714 Exhibit "H" - Design Review Action Comments dated October 19, 2004 Exhibit "I" - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00564 i i ~~~ ~ ~~ P ~a ~~ ~a ~~ I~ pi ~ pg3 E ~~SS ~~ .® ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .~» Ol-b ~. avw Nouvznun aua ~! m m ~~ 9D A ~- >a = W C T N= ~~ =N dy n a Z 9 m - ~..o -~ _ _ ~~ ~o~refre n-~ ~ 3 AYM33LL! i AYM~Ii t \ _ _ ~- ~~ `N . u f~J YWtlOl/rJ YDMMY~Iq OI/JMYtl jjj I~.p i 311N3Ar N11~8 Y3'Nr1I7 ~~ qq ! j - ~' dINStl3N1tlVd fi C~ e ~B ~ 3tl1N3~ SS3NIS/19 SL AYM33ad ~~ ~i E ~ g ~Q `; . ~ ~~ p € a ~ it s°I~Eilili ~~ E i i' E~ P; I4E~yI~'~I gg Il~~d ~ -~~~8 ~ iE~ 4 layiPlslpl~~I~E'•E~';iP€91~!ij1!EE9~~~p~Iiti~P~P I ~ ~ Il~~p?19~~~iIII~~~~~t~~~~Rf~at~~tsl~911~ .,t <„~ ~ °_ ~ .. ~ ~ p. ... .. ..aau.e tlatl.tl a tla otla.atl ~ I~j~i 9~ ~~~ ~ tl O t ~ ~Yi o a U ~a~~~~ °~ • .. • . ~ • : ,; . a . ~; • ~ - E1 P e a. ,I '~~ 1 i I ii ~~ 111 P !nL . 3 r r: e eY r o; ~ ' ~ a~ u P i a, e e ,~ ,. , ~ . E ~'"T iil I~~ ~ ~1 ~ i~ ,ell ~!!Ir r q r s = [~ r ~ e, e ' :e q E ? i S 3 i =a 1 ~a~ iES 'Ei' :;1 a I~ se ll life ~N+'~ C- s ~~ s~ -- t I i T ri a~ r a ~ yyyC~~~ gk t0 Y e .' / ,' ~ ,~ ~~ r ~s5oo-~ooz a~a ~t~,sT~aians ~~ I~ s °o q~ c I 0 o I I I I i ~, \ ~, ,.- _ ~~ 1 ~i ~ ~,, , ~~ W Z Z O ~~ V ~ ~ ~~-W Z X m T ~i ~ I i p I s ~~ _°s ~jc.~sB'z'T ~v-\~~ 8 ~ 8 8 S ~i o s ~ o ~~ .~~ I S'I ,~-~ ~~ ~I I s 0 U ~n ~ Ir ~, a m.. m. ~ a° ;H goo o '8 ~ o ~~~ ~~~ F ~~ II I I I I ~~. ~I ~~ gw III Wf `; iE s s s s s a ~ ~ ~~ L ~~c7 J YmMil-J YgIOIIYJIU oNJM~'M i ~~ pAA 3M[iAY MIME S~IMY/q 4 ~ ~~ 1~ ~~ O. L /p dIHStl3N1tlYd 7]y(e ~~ gg ~ III '~-~ "'- 3tl1N3~ SS3NISfiB 41 AtlM33tld ~ i g 47 ~ e acu r~ tmaf u. vuanv.®eee~ ~~ avu®avurwmlvl ~.v~rseam~smn~ "JJ > pp Y ~~ ~~ ~ s Y ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I ~ a --®OOO Y ~ ~ ~~ o ~~ , ...«. s~ R~ ~~ ~~; ~ ~~ ~~~ w u z 0 u w 0 z g ~~„ l~~E/D ~s ~~ rwao~ 'reiMOwrxaoxanx ~~~~~ ~ ~ I e~ Q E 5' a a~ra~r xiws a~xaa z ~ i S 3H1N3~ SS3NISfiB Sl AYM33!!d 5 ~T . L ~¢ ~~ dINS83N1tlYd ----------------------_• 0 o_ a n A t i e p A~t [ 9 i°A f4~ 13 6 ~ ~B~gilt 6 3~~~ fAE S I~i~~~l~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~e 519 z z N o: ¢¢5 ~~ O 7 ~ '` ` o T ~ Y l IRIItlOlT'9 YWYOwraq a/JN1~tl I~ 'p p ~• ~Il3AI Nll~$i3'pINJ •R• t' ! ¢ t ~~F +` dINStl3N1tlYd R y ~ pp '= 3tl1N3~ SS3NISIlB SF AYM33tld 6 6 i Q~ • ~I I ~ = y ~t I \ ~E \ ~ o \ Mi \ I 9 ' e e` !~ I ~! 9~ F z n .•- .,. m~ 0 Z= 9 y §' ~y A "4 0 n ~PY ~~ 9 !~ i t lip Z F I 4 } } R ! °8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~b ~k ~~~ia ~~ Q~ i1 ~ el iP;I ~I 81 ~I 0 i O ~~~~ ~~ •WtlOiII~ YONOwY~Yq ONJNrtl 3~MfiAI /11118 831~'IG u { S ~a ~ ~ S _ eiNSa3Nlava ci p - 3tl1N3~ SS3NIS(18 9t AYM33tld R M ~ ... U .a .+ .. _ --- ------ - - - ! Y si i a i ~ = r s '~ ~ / ~ u '_ Y ~~,, 4 ! 3 y 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a 8 ~ ~ Y YI' I 9 e ~~ s m F o£. ~~: ~4 !~ a ~~ z ~ < 1 ~ T O ¢ O O r k~ ~ ~ r • 1~ ~ ~ ~ %~~ ` %'~ n ry A i 1-1 b ~ ~ ~ @9 '{. a~ II ~ i3~E"l 3 ~s5oo-~ooz ~xa ~t~,sT~asgns ;'lil~,~ ~' ~ ~ m ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~;~ ~~~~+ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~k@~ ~sE~E ~~~QP ~~?sE :~i~~ ~€~i9€ ~~~~ z ~ ~g ~ ~ ¢~ F_ W ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ a ~ ~~~~ y!~~ ~bs ?~ ~ a eil'pp/ F~li9sa°~ 1 991[ ° 9 ~ j '1'IIA14 le6i,~i~.1~ ,i i~119F~, ~I;~ ~ H j ~ImAei~ jij~~'jli i ii~fii~~j ''~~' °. ~'~s` i~~,isi ui, i' iii; i~~~s~~~ - - ;~ gBs;iol tje! ~I~,~i i~; il'pli~';F i~~~~t'o Ii:iQ~O II'17i:tePB~ ~I{ ~~9~09!9!i ~IIl~~ g; i ~~ ex ~sQ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ § ~ ® e e I E 6 3 O f N FZV N R W J t 1 ~~ i~ 0 I ~ ~`~~ ~~W¢~'p W~aG Ciii®i ~ j~ w a ~ ~~/ ~ ~ ~ g ~~ / // - ~,-- I~ pi~ 1 ~~ 88~ I R_ ~~~ ~QgBm ~ ~~~~~ 1MMId ~iEl • hill r.~_;. E.xvrs8~ c'~'~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 40 p m Donald Granger October 19, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 - CECIL R CARNEY - A request to subdivide 1 48 acre into 3 parcels for industrial purposes in the Industrial Park Distract (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue - APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00564 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration , ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00564 - CECIL R CARNEY-The development of 3 industrial buildings totaling 15,501 square feet on 1 48 acre of land in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 12), located at the southern tenninus of Chades Smith Avenue - APN 0229-321-21 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Desion Parameters The 1 48 acre protect site at located is the southem tertmnus of Charles Smith Avenue Historically the protect site was used for vineyards, but now is pnmanly compnsed of invasive, weedy vegetation The I-15 Freeway (4th Street off-ramp forthe I-15 Freeway) begins lust • east of the site, hence, the site is visually prominent from the freeway The site slopes southerly at approximately 1 5 percent and has previously been disced for weed abatement purposes The surrounding properties include Industnal development to the west, five industrial buildings which have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street off-ramp to the south The I-15 Freeway vanes from 8 to 12 feet higher (north to south through the protect site) than the budding pad elevations The applicant is proposing to subdivide 1 48 acre of land into three separate parcels and develop three industrial bwldmgs The buildings are proposed on Parcels 1 through 3 and range from 3,875 to 6,218 square feet in size All three bwldmgs will share access from a driveway on Charles Smith Avenue All three bwldmgs are designed with separate parking and loading areas The loading areas are on the south side of each budding away from public view The buildings have a sculptural feel due to the articulation of wall planes both honzontally and vertically The bwldmgs constructed of painted tilt-up concrete with sandblasting incorporated as a second primary material The sandblasting is pnmanly used as an accent matenal on recessed areas (above and/or below vision and spandrel glass) Other architectural elements on the buildings include vision and spandrel glass and metal canopies atthe north and west elevations All buildings have recessed window bays and columns that will provide shadow Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 All bwldmgs should have additional sandblasted concrete in order to fulfill the requirement of having two primary building materials Sandblasted concrete should be added in larger proportions at all office areas/entrances for all buildings Staff suggests the following enhancements ,~~~ ~.~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16714 AND DRC2004-00564 - CECIL R CARNEY October 19, 2004 . Page 4 Bwldings A, B, and C Sandblast the entire wall plane on the north and west elevations at the office area/bwlding entrances The protect has a frontage along the I-15 Freeway, and requues enhanced architectural treatment to the north and east elevations visible from the I-15 Freeway Staff suggests that the following enhancements be made. Buildings A, B, and C At the northeast corner of all buildings on tMe north and east elevations, the entire extended wall plane should be sandblasted. Secondary Issues• Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The existing chain link fence on the east property line should be replaced with a wrought iron fence, thereby, providing continwty of fencing materials with the existing wrought fence along the west property line. Policy Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1. All roll-up doors shall be painted to match the building. 2. Outdoor employee eating areas should pre-cast concrete furniture, including tables, chairs, • and trash receptacles Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the protect sublect to the Major and Secondary Issues addressed as recommended above Design Review Committee Action. Members Present. Buller, Fletcher, McPhail Staff Planner: Donald Granger At the meeting, the Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval, sublect to the following conditions• Bwldings A, B, and C. The tower element shall include a decoratroe cornice, sublect to City Planner review and approval Buildings A, B, and C. The wall planes shall have additional vertical articulation including, but not limited to, score lines and reveals Final design shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval The existing chain link fence on the east property line shall be replaced with a wrought iron fence, thereby, providing continuity of fencing materials with the existing wrought fence along the west • property line The developer shall have the option to use a concrete tilt-up wall, or a combination of wrought iron fence and tilt-up wall The final design of the walUfence, spacing, and materials will be sublect to City Planner review and approval during plan check r~x~tz~rT "H-1~~ ~~~ ~~ `~ C~ ~~~~o®~aa~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ Ei'-ice s€~ muR' ..... art t t ~ _. .. "`='°`°``..ca ~ `.. ` ~ 'i Y p~j Fti F .:'c i~ ? r' S. `~!~ q. Frr s .t'~i ri.-i` *r K ~ r~ 5 •: ~.yi>a ~~,s_.y_~," ~ rs~~ ~~. y) ~ ~.. ~ w 1•, jj{(;y~j~ g - ~. $ $g L^ ~ Tr t~~ i~ ~t~{~i`f~u f jjjj~~}{}{((~~ 'F. 1. !~."«~' JIf".~1~ :}"~.!t g~ ~~48 kFF: 1r . ~#j.~ ~ ~:; ~ =l~~s~p5~~'"'rf _ b``~f 4 g ~~~d l~l ~ YTc.. _' "~# tSJji' ~^1 ^~..~~*M'"=rv~~it'-ikF r"~'~ ~~+ "r ~ ~ ~ ~e~~ F+ u~~ ;t "~t~r'r-y",,~.,~'~~~. r, o'rc.^is, w-~ ~~~ t ':, "' a .' 1, r ?y`ti~ "~T. r -. s q_ r y"r ~ .u: u,'~+fy.*a to rr~~ • _ ~ 1 ~ s. ~ti VI f~ i ~~x ~ C$ 'Gy~))1" yt • ~- L' ~ FYt~y~}i~~f~' Q~j~N.Y{ W~W ~y T. ~ _~ ~ ~Y.Il~ ri~•~Ctt~Y - ~i r ~t ~~L r ,~r~" t ~r . u ~ ~. ~ ~"j yi r:H }i. ` 3pfl~~; ` ~: t1YY~f a; ~~s4 p~~hH ~t ~ ; r i fQ~ ~C ' ~ ~• - r' ~ 1 s 3~ «~1-~<. 4 4}i I ~'t'"~6 ~ ~i*"F 4m`t -~ ~t`+~, v i z{aY:.'~~1'~/F'ie V P p ~rz ~_;°p ~1`-s. ~ S~fa ,)~ "r" ~..r ~,' ~•AI~~z~l lr ~~~5'. * 4-~~~ ffi~~ ~ i r t ~ $ >5 t~ h^f~...s. t \-ir Y i n1t,' ~ "t i`«7.1.•,.>~i«r ,~Y':~ '~' ~""Ft 1 ~ p ~';'~ `L'W n a ' ~'r.' .fN ""'>"t R A'` ~C; "~ fr'TLT:-~-.-.~..'", r" . "ir'~:, ~'~ e~)~ ~' ~~ r~'r ~"' ~~ ~4rt~ ~ _ ~ . t .if.~ .-,. _ 'F t • yyTt~~S?Y _ ~~G"' _ ~`. F~ e ~ t ~ _ -~ A r tai .F'rY{ .~ «.~c - ti«sV ,~ 1 ~~.3 a~, r. r i ,. ~s~.w ~nr ~n ~+bv «~ ~~ti X3„1 J'~' s ~ ,- _ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Crly of Rancho Cucamanpa (Please type or pent clearly using mk Use the tab key to move from one Ime to the neM Ime J Planning Omsron (908)477-2750 of this form is to inform the City of the basic componen it the City may reviewthe project pursuantto City Policie they California Environmental Quality Act; and the o~,lrriplemen# CEQ7~.'.It is important that the informat%or ep'rovidej in fullm~,nxs_. ,~ _, .. -., t' `~ r ~ ri;';;'~ w` I` ,,~ .~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that Itls the responslblllty o/the applicantto ensure that the appl~cabon Is complete at the time of submittal, Clty staff well not be available to perform work required to provide missing mformabon Appbcabon Number for the project to which this form pertains DRC 2004-001 Pro/ect Title FREEWAY 15 BUSINESS CENTRE Name 8 Address ofpro/ect owner(s) CECIL R CARNEY 12841 NEWPORT AVE ,TUSTIN, CA 9278-2711 Name & Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor SAME AS ABOVE Contact PersonBAddress C R CARNEY, INC 12841 NEWPORT AVE TUSTIN, CA 92780-2711 -CONTACT CECIL R CARNEY, ARCHITECT Name B Address of person preparing this form (~f different from above) SAME AS ABOVE Telephone Number 714-665-9500 r~ LJ 04-100 EnvuonmentallnfoFonn doc Page 1 of 9 ~ CY~ /~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM ~XMsC~xt '~" Y '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SOUTH END OF CHARLES SMITH AVE AND WEST SIDE OF FWY 15 ~_~ 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addrt~onal sheet rf necessary) 0229-321-21-0-000 `5) Gross Sde Ama (ac/sq ft) 1 48 AC/64,469 SF 'S) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedicahons) 1 48 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect fhe protect site (attach add~honal sheet rf necessary) NOT APPLICABLE 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permits whrch will be necessary from the Crty o(Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ect BUILDING PERMIT 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the pro/ect rncludmg information on topography, sod sfabrlrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (rncludmg age and cond~t~on) and the use of the stmctures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite alt sources of reformation (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheologrcal surveys, traffic studies) THE SITE CONSISTS OF ONE LOT IT WILL BE SUB-DIVIDED INTO THREE PARCELS THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY IS A NATURAL 1 5% - 2 5% DOWNWARD SLOPE TO THE SOUTH THE SOILS REPORT DOES NOT INDICATE ANY UNSTABLE SOILS THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT SCENIC ASPECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SITE 04100 EnvironmentallnfoFonn doc Page 2 0(9~ ~~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM Information rnd~cated by an asterisk (') rs not required of nonconstruct~on CUP's unless othenv~se requested by staff ~.J 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or histoncal aspects of the srte Cite all sources of mformat~on (books, published reports and oral history) NOT APPLICABLE 11) Descnbe any nose sources and theulevels that now affect the site (arroraff, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl afled proposed uses SEE ENCLOSED SOUND REPORT 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect m defer/ Thts should provide an adequate descnpt~on of the sde m terms of ultimate use that wdl result from the proposed protect Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the anhcrpated completion of each increment Attach addihonal sheet(s) tf necessary THE PROJECT WILL CONTAIN THREE SINGLE-STORY OFFICE/LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS THERE WILL BE NO PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT 04-100 EnwronmentallnfoForm doc Page 3 qj,9 /~_ ~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc J, intensity of land use (one-/amtly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, mar yard, etc) ~ SEE ENCLOSED PHOTOS NORTH FUTURE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES EAST FWY 15 SOUTH VACANT LAND, FWY OFF RAMP WEST EXISTING INDUSTRIAL FACILITY 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, state or character of the surrounding general ama of the pro/ed9 NO 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How wdl these noise levels af/ecf ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing am proposed9 THERE WILL BE TYPICAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SITE NOISE THERE WILL BE TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL VEHICAL NOISE THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY EFFECT ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT '16) Indicate proposed mmovals and/or mplacements of matum or scenic tines NOT APPLICABLE 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic water supp6esJ into which fhe site drams NOT APPLICABLE 04-100 EnvironmentallnfoForm dot Page 4 of 9 ~/J ~~ ^ ~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 ~ 5 AM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficatron, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercral/Ind (gal/day/ac) 3.000 00 Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 6 000 00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Sephc Tank ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUday) b Commerc~aUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) 2,000 00 l) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: '~ 20) Number of rnsdent~al urnts 0 Detached (md~cate range of parcel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze NOT APPLICABLE Attached (md~cate whether units are mntal or for sale unds) NOT APPLICABLE 21) Anticipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $0 00 to $0 00 Rent (per month) $0 00 to $0 00 22) Spealy numberof bedrooms by unit type NOT APPLICABLE 23) Indicate ant~crpated household see by unit type NOT APPLICABLE 04100 EnvvonmentallnfoForm doc Page 5 of 9~ ~~ ~_ Created on 5/24!2004 8 15 AM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the project Contact the appropnate School Distracts as shown in Attachment B • a Elementary b Junior High 0 c Senior High 0 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, rndustnal or institutional uses NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME ~,,,,, 28J Total floor area of commercial, rndustnal, or instrtut~onal uses by type BLDG A 6218 SF, BLDG B 5407 SF, BLDG C 3875 SF TOTAL 15500 SF OFFICE /WAREHOUSE USE 27) Indicate hours of operation NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME 28) Number of employees Total 0 Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift 29) Provide bn=akdown of ant~cipatedlob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the 2te of hire /or each classification (attach additional sheet rf necessary) NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME 30) Est~mat~on of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City 0 '31) For commercial and rndustnal uses only, rnd~cate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Qualdy Management Distract, at (818) 572-8283) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME 04-100 EnvrronmentallnfoForm doc Page 6 of 9K Y ~ Created on 5/24/2004 6 15 AM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies sery/ng the protect been contacted to determine them ability to • provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ If so, please indicate their response 33J In the known history of this property, has there been any use,, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenalsv Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but arelIlnot limited to PCB's, radioachve substances, pesbades and herbicides, fuels, ods, solvents, and otherBammable hgwds<and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, if known NO 34) tMll the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above if yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans I hereby certdy that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation ofthis protect to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~ ~ ~~ Signature G~~~G sue/ - Title 0' ~U~ /i~V lr `„~/ r 04-100 EnvnonmentallnfoForm doc Page 7 of 9 {~ f/,ca~/ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM ATTACHMENT A . Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family ApUCondo Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family ApUCondos Commercial/lnd ustrial General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Generallndustnal Heavy Industrial 600 gal/day 400 gal/day 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 2,500 gal/day/ac 3,001 gal/day/ac 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 w. 04-100 EnvironmentallnfoFonn doc Page 8 of 9~' ~p~~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sulte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 MIME ~J • 04-100 EnvvonmentallnfoForm doc Page 9 of 9 ~ ~ , `f~ Created on 5/24/2004 8 15 AM w a ROUTE ~ ~~ PROJECT ITE ~, ~ ' J O 2' 6TH STREET Z a N w 4TH STREET CHARLES SMITH AVE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00764 LOCATION MAP ~~~~~ II II a -~ ~ II III a nn_f~ - Aoki ... __ 0 ~' /1 W e ARROW f • e . ~iy0 1/5 _L~ hn. ,• ~I ill ~ ?~ • I ~ Ehw ~ 1 leel °l n /iap • : - NT/G <i FE AT EKA N u aT Rochester - 1 , ,..,.,~ .,,, e e ~ " ~ - ~ Power Ia 4 - e ~ - A D - ..u...~.... - - ~ ^ 1 1100' ~/ e I l p Dili I ",®nu ®` - t_ 100- , ' e e 1 ~.... .; a ... .,, _ _ e e e u a .. . ova ~ I e C3UASTI, CALIF. 'e° ~ ~ 1 e ~ 3E/4 ONTARIO 13' WIADRANOLE o n a N3400-W11730/7 5 ii e I • \ ~ / 19 v n II -J /~ e e e 66 PHOTOREVISED 1881 DMA x434 1 os 11 8E-SERIEB V883 Well q 0 ~ g RANCHO CORP BDY `I _ ____ -__= BOUN AR I SA _____ ` II Il .. • r pl oReserYp \ l li e f ~ i 11 I ' n \. ~ f~W III/ li ,,ee , e II ~\ /om \;\ _ - ~~ 1I e, ~I • .. , • i li ~. R e O _ _ __ ___ a L4E-____ -~~ ~_~_____-~ II I II • - _ Ifl~( 2~ __ _ _ _ O O ~} L 'E / s ~<ne A FREEWAY ~ ~ I • . ( \ 9 . 1990 ~ _. _ .. - 5 c I 9g~~ .Wi ~ ~ 'O nn • • 96J • B •. n~ L __ ill II II N " ~~ II ;I I 31 O )9 I ~ V - I 950 u ~ I E ~ n II II II " II II " ~ it I I I I I V.. ll ~ Q~ II II II II II II II ' 'I I I 950 I ' O I ~ :il' 9~ II _.. li ____ )wem I ii ! i II I ________ I __________ 9J6 ~ ~. _ __ __ I ~~ ~k t ~ " t , t _. ~ ~ Y ,_ y Viewing South -fi. r~.,,,~ _ .. _w _ ~ _ ~_ ~ ~ - 7~Y. .~~.-.-~ ~ yxp ( ~ -xzeE-_~~. r _ ~ ~ i. ~., r ~'~nk`~rY+~y~{Uiti-~+r °.=S ~M .e 4 r rX ~* t r ~ ' ~ 4 u ' ^ ~ vyj i} ~~ ~v.W'W..e ~}S ~~ kyT ~ _ .. eN :. a a ~ T i 4 ~' 4- ~ ,. ,. 1 . a ~ ~ _ ~ a Q 9 x'rdt t~L'v* t 0 ~ + s<~ rah x x ~° t asP 53 l$`• { ; ~ i ~• ~ ~5~0~ `arc V~e~sn~ Nest ~ ~~a9 FRE~i~'~4 ~' I S CENTRE Viewing South ~' ~,, _ ; ,. k, J, ° a , A r ~~ ~t1 ' "~~ ~, a ~ ~ _ ~' Vie~vYng West • ~~~3d City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2004-00171 ~ ~ 3. Description of Project. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 - CECIL R CARNEY - A request to subdivide 1 48 acres into 3 parcels for industrial purposes in the Industrial Park Distract (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-321-21 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00564 - CECIL R CARNEY -The development of 3 industrial bwldings totaling 15,500 square feet on 1 48 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-321-21 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Ceal R Carney 12841 Newport Avenue Tustin, CA 92780-2771 5. General Plan Designation Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 12) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 1 48 acre protect site at located is the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue Historically the protect site was used for vineyards, but now is primarily comprised of invasive, weedy vegetation The site slopes southerly at approximately 1 5 percent and has previously been disced for weed abatement purposes The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, 5 industrial buildings that have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street offramp to the south The I-15 Freeway is approximately 6 feet higher than the site Access into the site is from Charles Smith Avenue The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site 8. Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number Donald Granger, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None ~~~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR-Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District "`""' URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics (/) Agncultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Matenals (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing () Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic () Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed pro/ect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the envronment, there wdl not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared () I find that the proposed pro/ect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Rev 5/24/04 {~~~aa u n L..J ~1 U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004 ~)05~4 Page 3 Prepared By Reviewed ~~~ 33 Date Date Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Develdpment Review DRC2004-00564 Page 4 • Less,nan S9n'fimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polentia4y Sigiufinnl WM A4tlge0m 7han 9grvfipnt No ~ n ~~ te0 ~ ct ~ ct EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () ~„ () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, bit () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, ahd historic ' bwldings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or ad/scent to the pro/ect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The 1 48 acre prolect site is located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue The site slopes southerly at approximately 1 5 percent and has previously been disced for weed abatement purposes The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, 5 industrial buldings that have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street offramp to the south The visual quality of the area wdl not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards requre the developer to underground existing and new uttlity lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect sde The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract Rev 5/24/04 /v ~~3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 5 Less Than Signifipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenhally Significant wtn MNgahon Than Significant No Im tl Into ted I p I tl c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments ~. a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands,/ Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The 1 48 acre protect site i$ located is the southem terminus of Charles Smith Avenue The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, 5 industrial buildings that have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street offramp to the south There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant • unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The 1 48 acre protect site is located is the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue `The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, 5 industrial buildings that have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street offramp to the south The nearest agricultural use is more than 1/2 mile east of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality wolatwn~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations ~ ~~ ~~ Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Maq SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 6 Lrss Than Sigmfirant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant WAN Mitigation Than &gMicanl No I C Inco ted I ct I n e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~) number of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued developmeht will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ~ ~~ ~~ r1 LJ Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 7 Liss Than Sismfirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrvfirant win MNgatian titan SlBrvfipnt No I d In ted I h I d • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work period. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~g would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented . 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools /~ ~~~/~ Rev 5/24/04 !~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 8 Less Than 9gnfiont Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenOally Sigrvfinnl Wilh hL~gatlm Than SIgNB®nl No i a mw teo I i 12) All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules m conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules arougd, the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute . to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create s~gmficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants ident~ed in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The nearest sensitive receptor, apartments located at the northwest corner of Milliken and 4th Street, is located 3/4 of a mile away Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated e) Typically, the industrial uses proposed do not create obiectionable odors Further, the protect site is located in the Industrial Park District and does not permit land uses that create odors that are perceptible outside the bwlding Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticpated ~~~~~ • Rev 5/24/04 ~~ Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 9 Less Than SigNfionl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotenlw711y Sigmficanl WN MN~IIOn Than S~gmfinnt No i a m ied I a i a 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status w„ species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and'Wildhfe Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildirfe Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local polices or ordinances () () () (~) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) Historically the protect site was used for vineyards, but now is primarily comprised of invasive, weedy vegetation The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual disking for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997 In October 2003, Compliance Biology pertormed a Habitat-Based Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the DSF The report also evaluated the protect site for habitat suitability and evidence of additional special-status wildlife speces known from the area Results of the survey indicated that the protect site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF because of 1) presence of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) primary historical use of the site in grape cultivation, 3) there iys/~~n~io, apparent connectivity to the subject site from Rev 5/24/04 ~T`~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 10 Leas 7nan ' Signifimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant win Miogatlon Than Signifinnl No 1 cl In tetl I p I cl the nearest known DSF population, 4) no DSF have been observed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 5) the site is isolated from undisturbed or natural habitats These disturbance-related factors collectively contribute to reduce the occurrence potential of DSF Based on the conclusions of the habitat suitability evaluation as summarized above, the occurrence potential of DSF is considered to be loy/ end the subtect site does not support optimal DSF habitat Long-standing"su'rface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development activities, have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Also, the subtect site would not likely be considered and essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commercial and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adtacent to the site b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans Hell occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the O O O (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or umque geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O O (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments' a) The pro/ect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamong{~a_ area is known to have been inhabited by Native Rev 5/24/04 /Z„Jt ~Cr'~TCY/1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 11 ~~' sum°~ Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g P°'en°°ny Sig~ufimnt """ A4p7dOm Th90 SigrvfimM N° i n i°~ i•a i n i Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented ~, 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ~1 L_J • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvwm per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading Rev 5/24/04 /J ~ `~~ Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 12 Less 7tun Sig'ufirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°""~a0y SiB~fiaml `"" Ahhg3hon ~"° Sigrvficant No i a i°m lea i a i a contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. NY d) The proposed prolect is in an area that h8s already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual diskirig for wet;d abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are antiapated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect , a) Expose people or sVuctures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Dmsion of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shaking? O O O (/) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) `Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? O (/) O ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the prolect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Specal Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 3 5 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles north of the site These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 10 miles nolrt~/h^e~ast of the site and the San Andreas, Rev 5/24/04 ~° ~ G ~ 'l • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 13 Less Twi S,gmfitant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P0'"'~fiY Sigrufimnl win MNg34°n Than Sigrvfinnt No i a m lea i a i a capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 13 % miles north of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind ,&onditions durng September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activdies may temporanly~exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWoCB) daily to reduce PM~fi emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~fi emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction . 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~a emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Fine Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of sods are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Fine Sand Sod association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils typically have very slow runoff, and the hazard of soil blowing is moderate, but can be high if soil is unprotected Delhi fine Sand can be nearly level to strongly sloping The project site has gentle grades in southerly direction No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The pro/ect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed Rev 5/24/04 /~ ~~~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 14 Less Tian Sigrnficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentally $igruficanl WM MNgaeon Than S,grvfimnt No I cl In teo I tl I d 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals~ µ„ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( () O O (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conddions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ' within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ' () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) ,Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O O (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide/in~teragency/co~ahbon that is considered a full service Rev 5/24/04 /u ~~7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 15 Less Than S~gmfiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PalenWlly Significant Wih MiGgaOOn Than SiBnifiwnt No I C Into tetl I d I cl Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for signif'icent impacts to a level le$S than sign cant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 4 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each~Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 2 Y, miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated , g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wlldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • r~~~~ Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 16 Less man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenbaliy Sgmficant WN MNgabon Than 9gnrfipnl No I h In tetl I atl I C 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) r substantially with groundwater recharge such that r there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments. • r ~ IL_ J a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over one acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these per~m//its~//~/~ Rev 5/24/04 ~ 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 17 Lass 7hari SigNfieanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g `~•+°al'Y Significant vim ALbpaban Tian Sign,ficant No I ct Inc letl I d I tl Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of one acre or more Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit regwres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading ,,,, • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off- site into receiving waters • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation • Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect resulting in the disturbance of 1 acre or more requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are requred to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Ceal Carney, 2004, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage stone water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Constructon Activdies 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either Rev 5/24/04 ~ ~~ ~'/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 18 Leas Than Slgniflcsnt less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g 1=°tenLaily SlBnlfirent w,ln MNgaaon Then $Ignlfi®nt N° 1 d Inco letl I d I acY on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction; to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sedtment from the site Post- Construction Operational 1) SD-10 Stte Design -Parking lot grading will be designed to direct on-site flows through a filtering system (See MP-40 below) before discharging to the local street. 2) SD-12 -Efficient Irrigation - To reduce the amount of nuisance flows and the accompanying transport of sediment or waste, efficient irrigation design and methods will be employed. 3) SD-13 Storm Dratn Stgns - As a deterrent against the dumping of waste and chemicals, appropriate storm drain signs will be paroled on all drainage inlets 4) SD-32 Trash Enclosures -Each parcel will have a constructed trash enclosure to reduce the dispersion of trash. 5) MP-40 Media Filter -Runoff is expected to leave the individual parcels via curb drains, which can have media filters inserted for the collection of debns, trash, sediment and/or soils. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented Rev 5/24/04 ~~ `f"~ i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 19 Las Than si9nifia,nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~~nifinlnt g MN'non pa Sl ltan gmfia+nl No i n inw lea i a i a 7) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. ,,,,,, c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect Hall not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signficant ' d) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a sde, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site wdl not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff wdl be conveyed to existing stone drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result m substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated wdh the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimmat~on System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 20 Less Than Signifiont Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentally SigniBOnt WUi Minga4an Tian Signifipnl No I act Into lea 1 C I act h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debrs dams anal levees n~rth of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown m General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected /) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict wdh any applicable habdat conservation plan O O O (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The 1 48 acre pro/ect site is located is the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue The site slopes southerly at approximately 1 5 percent and has previously been disced for weed abatement purposes The surrounding properties include industrial development to the west, 5 industrial buildings that have an approved land use entitlement that are in the plan check review to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and the I-15 Freeway/4th Street offramp to the south This prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding development to the north and west The protect will become a part of the larger industrial community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Industrial Park The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources ~~~~o Rev 5/24/04 C J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 21 Less Than Slgn,fiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~t~fi~~ i e Mlw,eon ea S't'an mafim,t Mo i a m tee i i a The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish 8 Wtldlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997 In October 2003, Compliance Biology performed aHabitat-Based Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the DSF The report also evaluated the project site for hab,~at suitability and evidence of additional speaal-status wildlife species known from the area Results of the survey indicated that the project site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF because of 1) presence of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) primary histoncal use of the site in grape cultivation, 3) there is no apparent connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known DSF population, 4) no DSF have been observed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 5) the site is isolated from undisturbed or natural habitats These disturbance-related factors collectively contribute to reduce the occurrence potential of DSF Based on the conclusions of the habitat suitability evaluation as summarized above, the occurrence potential of DSF is considered to be low and the subject site does not support optimal DSF habitat Long-standing surface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development actmties, have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Also, the subject site would not likely be considered and essential • or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commercial and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adjacent to the site 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the iresidents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE Would the project result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) ~ () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels Rev 5/24/04 ~~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 22 Les Than Signfignt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sigmfipnt WiN A4bgahon Than S,g,ufNant No I cl Inca tea I ct I d c) A substantial permanent Increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels In the pro)ect vicinity above levels existing without the pro)ect~ d) A substantlai temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the pro)ect vicinity above levels existing without the pro)ect~ ~ e) For a pro)ect located within an airport'land use plan or, O O O (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the pro)ect expose people residing or working In the pro)ect area to excessve noise level5~ f) For a pro)ect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the pro)ect expose people residing or working in the pro)ect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The pro)ect site Is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A noise study was prepared (BridgeNet, July 27, 2004) to evaluate the impacts of traffic noise on the proposed pro)ect The greatest traffic noise exposure for the proposed pro)ect will on occur on the eastern side of the three buildings The east elevation of the buildings will be exposed to noise levels up to 78 3 dBA from the I-15 Freeway The type of construction (9-inch tilt-up concrete) for the three buildings will provide an interior noise level for the three buildings of 42 dBA or less Accordingly, no building upgrades are required The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected Surrounding development consists of tilt-up concrete industrial building that provides sufficient noise attenuation b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The Citys Development Code requires that all Industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the pro)ect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The pro)ect Is located approximately 2 1/4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No im[p/~act is a~nitici/pa~t~ed~, Rev 5/24/04 rCJ ~v `~' ~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 23 Less Than Slgn,finnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Polenl~ally Sigrvfitant wU MiogaOOn Than Significant No I,rQatl Incappaletl Inpatl Irr~d 72. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing,housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere ~ ' c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments' a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protection? O O O (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facildies~ O O O (/) Comments. a) The site, located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 3/4 of a mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated ~ ~~ ~3 Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 24 less man Slgmfipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PaenlWlly Sigrcficant wU, fiLe~oon man s~~efiont No i n m fee i a i a b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga+6chool District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuancetof bwiding permits No impacts are anticpated ] ~ "~ d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, the Epicenter Sports complex, is located approximately 1 1/4 miles from the protect site The protect will not requite the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are antiapated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR ident~ed the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the Cary has planned a new library within the Victona Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facihhes or O O O (~) regwre the construction or expansion bf recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 1/4 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above ~ ,'I~ ~S"//J t~/ JT Rev 5/24/04 ~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 25 Less T,en SigNfiesnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Polen°elly Signfi°ant wlm MifigaEOn Tien Sipnifimnl No 1 d In teE I I 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the prolect a) Cause an Increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase In ,,,,, either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, ether indroidually or cumulatively, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change In air traffic patterns, Including () () () (/) either an increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results In substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result In inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result In inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) ~ Implementation of the proposed prolect will generate 122 vehicle trips dally The proposed prolect includes the development of a total of 17,500 square feet of light industrial The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each 1,000 square feet will generate 6 97 trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load In the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or Included in prolect design The prolect well not create a substantial increase In the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the Clty has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The three-building prolect will generate 18 two-way, peak hour trips, which Is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, the proposed prolect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each 1,000 square feet of floor area will generate 1 04 two-way peak hour trips dally The proposed prolect includes a total of 17,500 square feet The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on,,/adlacent arterials The prolect will be required to Rev 5/24/04 ~ „/C/ ~~ IrnUal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 26 Less Tian Signfiram Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotenWlly Signficanl Wih MNgaOm Than Signfiont No I a In Ie0 I a I a provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No Impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 2 1/4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and well not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated d) The prolect is in an area that Is mostly developed ~lrhe prolect well be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter end sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect wili be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The prolect design Includes, or the prolect well be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the prolect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result In the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing faculties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that It has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand In addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landhll wdh sufficient permitted O O O (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Rev 5/24/04 //1 ~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 27 Less man S~pNficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PolenUally S~gnifirant Wflh AMUpaOOn Than Sipniflmnl No i n i Leo i n i a Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastetlhater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacty The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the sties of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent The proposed protect would include the construction/operation of 3 industrial buildings totaling 15,500 square feet Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall ~ iYnder the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221, and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CCWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilities Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The pro/ect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distnct water system There is currently a suffiaent water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticpated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with suffiaent capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticpated Rev 5/24/04 ~ ~~ Imtlal Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Page 28 Less Than Signifipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 a°~enbaliy Sigmfifanl vim MNgabon Tna° Sigrvfifant No i a m fee i a i a 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () (/) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cgrrlmunity, ~ ,/ reduce the number or restrict the rdmge of a rare or endangered plant or animals or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future pro/ects)~ c) Does the pro/ect have environmental effects that will () () ~ () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human bungs, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The site is located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) as identified within the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF dated September 14, 1997 In October 2003, Compliance Biology performed aHabitat-Based Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the DSF The report also evaluated the protect site for habitat suitability and evidence of additional special-status wildlife speaes known from the area Results of the survey indicated that the protect site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF due to 1) presence of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) primary historical use of the site in grape cultivation, 3) there is no apparent connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known DSF population, 4) no DSF have been observed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 5) the site is isolated from undisturbed or natural habitats These disturbance-related factors collectively contribute to reduce the occurrence potential of DSF r~ LJ ~-1 t~ Based on the conclusions of the habitat suitability evaluation as summarized above, the occurrence potential of DSF is considered to be low and the subtect site does not support optimal DSF habitat Long-standing surface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development activities, have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Also, the subject site would not likely be considered and essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commercial and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adjacent to the site ~~ Rev 5/24/04 Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga . <Insert Protect Name> Page 29 b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The Ctty made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balanang the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15Q92 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by' developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction actiwties were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) \ The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Cmc Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Speaflc Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Industrial Area Speafic Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) (/) Water Quality Management Plan, Cecil Carney (July, 2004) (/) Habdat Swtabddy Evaluation, Compliance Biology (October, 2003) ~ ~~ ~~ Rev 5/24/04 Initial Study for <Insert Project Name> City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 (/) Noise Analysis, Bridge Net International (July, 2004) M`i ~ ~~ ~ r 1 L_J 1 II u Rev 5/24/04 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga <Insert Protect Name> Page 31 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur r~ Applicant's Signature ~s ~U1~6' Date ~~i,~,n./ ! ~ ~"T Pnnt Name and Tdle v~x' ' ~~~~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2004-00564is doc ~ ~~~~/ Rev 5/24/04 City of Rancho Cucamonga . NEGATIVE DECLARATION The fol/owing Negatrve Declaration rs being circulated for public review rn accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 0/the Public Resources Code. Project File No.• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 Public Review Period Closes. December 8, 2004 r I Pro/ect Name: Prolect Applicant. Cecil R Carney Project Location (also see attached map)• Located at the southern terminus of Chades Smith Avenue - APN 0229321-21 Project Description: A request to subdivide 1 48 acre into 3 parcels and the development of 3 industrial buildings totaling 15,501 square feet FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the pro/ect may have a sigmhcant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negatrve Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negatrve Declaration means that an Envvonmental Impact Report will not be required Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The pro/ect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mvrted to comment on the proposed Negatrve Declaration during the review period December 8. 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By r ~ LJ • ~ ~~ ~a . RESOLUTION NO 04120 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714, A SUBDIVISION OF 3 PARCELS ON 1 48 ACRE OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATEDAT THE SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-321-21 A ReGtats 1 CeGI R Camey filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is, referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occun•ed B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. . 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Parl A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, including wnrien and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to vacant properties located at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, totaling 1 48 acre, and b The property to the north of the subtect site has an approved entitlement for five industnal buildings and is zoned General Industnal, the property to the west ~s improved vwth an industnal budding and is zoned Industnal Park and General Industnal, and to the south and east of the site is the I-15 Freeway, and c The application proposes the subdivision of a 1 48 parcel site into three parcels ranging in size from 46 acre to 57 acre All parcel sizes are permitted since the project site is part of a previous entitlement that contained a master plan (Tentatve Parcel Map SUBTPM16118 and Development Review DRC2003-01038), and d The application, m contunction with Development Review DRC2004-00564, proposes the development of three industnal buildings totaling 15,501 square feet, and e The subdivision, togetherwith the recommended conditions of approval, complies • with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga by ~~~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY . December 8, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is donsistent vwth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdiviswn 4 Based upon the fads and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative . Decaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significent effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information coniained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration vnth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the proled, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of • adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every cond~on set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~p Department 1) All conditions of approval for Development Review DRC200400564 shall apply Engmeenng Department ~, 1) Install pnvate storm drams to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drams The cost of pnvate storm drams shall be borne by this development , a) For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to handle Qioo and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the Quo if the sump outlet is plugged b) Sumps m the pnvate storm drain system shall be designed for Oioo and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches m automobile parking areas and 18 inches m truck parking areas 2) Development will be regwred to install all missing public improvements Charles Smith Avenue public improvements shall include curb and gutter, pavement, sidewalk, dnve approaches, drainage devices, streetlights, and street trees per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Install street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a speGes and spaced in accordance with the City's street tree program. b) Construct dnve approaches m accordance vnth Standard Drav~nng No 101, Type C, minimum 35 feet wide c) Relocate one existing 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlight out of the proposed new dnveway location Provide up to four additional 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights (if not previously installed) d) Provide and/or protect existing street improvements including traffic signing and stnpmg, R26 "NO PARKING" signs, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement, storm drams, and drainage faalities, etc 3) The Caltrans area to the east of the property and adjacent to the southbound I-15 Freeway may need to be landscaped m accordance vnth Caltrans specifications Contact Caltrans (Distnct 8) about their highway planting improvement agreements The applicant shall secure an agreement with Caltrans to provde all necessary landscape and imgation to the I-15 Freeway landscaped area, and to provide ~ ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 4 maintenance service m accordance with the Caltrans requirements and for all expenses thereof 4) On-site storm drams shall be pnvately maintained to their connection points on the mainline (street function structures) Prowde a drainage study for on-site storm dram system, include all flows tnbutary from the properties to the north Pnvate storm drains with sump catch pasms shall be designed to handle O~~ Provide secondary overflow routes for all sump catch basins including sump trenph dram type balm In sump catch basin conditions, the maximum ponding for on-site stone drains at O~oo shall be 12 inches m automobile travel and parking areas and 18 inches in truck travel and parking areas 5) The parcel is subject to storm water overflow drainage per Covenant recorded January 26, 1997, as per Instrument No 97-0029486 The surface overflow drainage easement shall be graded to conyey overflows in the event of blockage in the sump catch basin on Charles Smith Avenue and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls or other obstructions placed across the easement a) Provide/obtain a surface overflow drainage easementvnth the sde to the west to be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage m the pnvate sump catch basin at the south end of Parcel 3 (SUBTPM 16714) and make provisions for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement For sump conditions, the storm dram from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to handle Qin~ and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the O~~ if the sump outlet is plugged b) If the sump catch basin m Charles Smith Avenue were to become blocked, the overflow surface drainage would breach the street nght-of--way and could inundate the protect site or portions thereof Provide an easement m favor of the City for stone drain overflow surface drainage across the project property Surface overflow shall be conveyed to the existing drainage easement comdor across the site to the west (Bradshaw) and the Costco site into 4th Street 6) Obtain permission from the adtacent property owner(s), and provide proof of such to the City, to enter and construct storm drain facilities across any portion of their property 7) An easement for a tomt use dnveway and dnve aisle between the three proposed parcels shall be completed and shown on the final map pnor to issuance of bwlding permits 8) Maintenance of Best Management Practice (BMP)s identified m the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) The responsible party for Operation and Maintenance of these shall record ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 5 with the County of San Bernardino the appropnate WQMP Template Attachment included with the Model Water Quality Management Plan Gwdance Handout 9) Adequate provisions and appropnate permit(s) shall be obtained ~nnth Caltrans to grade, accept, and dispose of surface drainage vnthin their adtacent nght-of-way or entenng the project site from Caltrans to a point of discharge of Caltrans' choice or other public storm drairf 4aality as approved by the City Engineer Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equpment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to the Gty denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment v~nll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3)~ All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include tyre follovnng provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods ~ ~~/~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 ' Page 6 • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Gty if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations,dunng hig6~ words (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in abcordance wdh Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daffy to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance wilh SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All industnal and commercial facilities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (~ e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parlung for vanpools 12) All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industnal and commercial site tenants v~nth 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters ~_~ ~~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY December S, 2004 ' Page 7 15) All residential and commerGal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeGal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the proled area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the moni~itor/of the find ~v !~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714-CECILR CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 8 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emis`"lions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 / 2) Frontage public streets, shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated wrath vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inadrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PMia emissions Hydrology and Water Qualrty 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submd to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent ~ practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to ~~~~ r-1 ~J ~J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714-CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 9 control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) SD-10 Site Design -Parking lot grading wdl be designed to direct on- site flows through a filtenng system (See MP-40 below) before discharging to the local street 6) SD-12 - Effiaent Imgation - To reduce the amount of nwsancer^flows and the accompanying transport of sediment or waste, effiGent in'igation design and methods wdl be employed 7) SD-13 Storm Dram Signs - As a deterrent against the dumping of waste and chemicals, appropnate storm drain signs wdl be painted on all drainage inlets 8) SD-32 Trash Enclosures -Each parcel will have a constructed trash enclosure to reduce the dispersion of trash g) MP-40 Media Filter- Runoff is expected to leave the individual parcels via curb drains, which can have media filters inserted for the collection of debns, trash, sediment and/or sods 10) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including morntonng provisions for a minimum of iwo years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits 11) Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-sde shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 12) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submdto the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit - The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~~'I/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-120 SUBTPM16714- CECIL R CARNEY . December 8, 2004 Page 10 BY Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST ' Brad Buller, Secretary ~,l ~~ ~„ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning ~bmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES. COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS CJ f'v ~~ 72- • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implem2hting the mitigation measures identified in'the Mitigated Negative Declaration for tht;above-fisted protect This program has been prepared,in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported i 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ ~E ~I3 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM16714 AND DRC2004-00564 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no furtheY action is required for the specific phase of development ,,, All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may apse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design,,construction, or operational personnel. • The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if wmpliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten • notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Diwsion shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~ ~~ 2~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No. Applicant: Cecil R. Carnev Initial Study Prepared by: _Donald Granger. Assistant Planner a Date: June 28. 2004 ~- .. . - .. •. • . . Air Quality ~ ~ ~~,~ . ,N ..»M,,,~ ~~ •~, *~,-,~„,. ~.~,.~,x. ~ .. ~ ~ 5 m , All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records - shall be available at the construction site for City - - venficahon - Pnor to the issuance of any grading permds, developer CP/BO C Review of plans- C - 2 shall submit construcbon plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use - - Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC - 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 - Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 1 of 8 ,. . - - . ~ ., .. . .. . • • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC p/4 • Phase gradin to r t th g p even e susceptibility of large BO - C R f areas to erosion over extended periods of time eview o plans AIC z/4 Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of BO C Review of plans AIC z/q work periods • Dispose of su l rp us excavated material in BO C Review of plans A q accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public Dunng q q thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction ~ Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A q stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordancewith SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction ~ areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 2 ~~ " . -. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Revew of plans AIC 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to - the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans - C 2/4 required to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters - All residential and commercal structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualrfied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Revew of report AID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value V 3of8 p~ ,. .~ ,. , . . . . .. ... .. . . •. .. • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report Ali 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educatin the ubl b ' CPIBO g p ic a out the area s archaeological heritage C Review of report P/O 3l4 Propose mitigation mea CP/BO sures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate advers C Review of report A/~ 3/4 e prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical CP resources management report, C R f A/~ 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and eview o .report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect - area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent - - z archiving _ A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report aD 4 field survey of the pro/ect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wdl also provide specific recommendations regarding further mi6gatwn measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mdiga4on monitoring is appropriate, _ the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report a0 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO BIC Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 4 0~ W (~ `tl • .. ... .. ... .. . . Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a CP D Review of report D 3 copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils The site shall be treated w th i water or other soil- t b BO C During A s a ilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) q daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets h ll b s a e swept according to a BO C D schedule established by the City to reduce PM,p uring construction q 4 emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of ear of y construction _ _ Gradin o er t h g p a ions s all be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to mmim¢e PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes - -_ - _ Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A q RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~ -~ Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that - shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 5 of 8 • .. ... ~. ~ ~, .. . An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and aff-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actrodies are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to _ rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent _ discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site SD-10 Site Design -Parking lot grading will be designed BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 to direct on-site flows through a filtering system (See MP-40 below) before discharging to the local street SD-12 - Effiaent Irrigation - To reduce the amount of BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 nwsance flows and the accompanying transport of sediment or waste, efficient ~rngation design and methods will be employed SD-13 Storm Drain Signs - As a deterrent against the BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 dumping of waste and chemicals, appropriate storm drain signs will be painted on all drainage inlets SD-32 Trash Enclosures -Each parcel will have a BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 constructed trash enclosure to reduce the dispersion of trash 6 a~ W • - . -~ .. MP-40 Media Filter -Runoff is expected to leave the BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 individual parcels via curb drains, which can have media filters inserted for the collection of debris, trash, sediment and/or soils Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of lwo years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO B/CID Review of plans PJC - 2/4 be integrated into the design of the pro/ect where - appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, - - diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge = basins -- _ - - Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Op 7 of 8 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method'of Verification, - ~ . ' Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A- On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Butldmg Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReporislStudiesl Plans) 4 - Stop W ork Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP - 7 -Citation i \plannmg\final\cega\mmchklst-revs-04final doc W ,~At7 ~1 • 8 °• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Mai PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16714 I °~ SUBJECT: THREE PARCEL SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: CECIL R LOCATION: APN 0229-321-21 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comoleaon Date . A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemabve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation discretion t shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel No 16714 is granted subject to the approval of Development _/_/_ Review DRC2004-00564 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Piamm~g _/_/ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ . of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~~~ ~3 Pro~ecl No SUBTPM16714 Comoletton Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/. State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, ail _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance w„ 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permane~itly maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 pnor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Pro/ect Number (SUBTPM16714) clearly identified on the outside of all plans ~ 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/ ed prior to plan check submittal ir Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requ ( ~ ~~,1~~1 Protect No SUBTPM16714 Comolehon Date 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City pnorto permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fenang and/or walls ~ _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Bulding and Safety Division F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _I_/_ marked with the protect file number (SUBTPM16714) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and SafetyrDivision for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.. // „ ~,~ 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development protect or _/_I_ ma/or addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees;~Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _I_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays . 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _I_/_ counter) G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code far requred occupancy separations _/_I_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/_/_ H. Grading 1 Gradrng of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check ~~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16714 Comoletlon Date The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOIL COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved Reciprocal parking agreements for ail parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring tolnt maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map J. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvml Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Troll Other Charles Smith Avenue (b) X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic sigrnng and striping as required Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro)ect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer /~ ~~~~ _~_~~ I / / / -~-~- -~-~ / / / / / / -f-~ 4 Protect No SUBTPM16714 Comoletion Date ~1, Ir....J Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Englneer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the Clty Englneer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction oft/he City Engineer """ g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks lfnder sidewalk drains shall be installed to'City Standards, except for smgl~ family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size City. Chades Smith Avenue Brachychiton populneus Bottle tree 5 ft 25 ft o c 15-gal FIII-In Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sub/ect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only r~ ICJ Public Maintenance Areas K. A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control L. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas / / -/-/- -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / ~ ~~~7 Protect No SUBTPM16714 Comole6on Date M. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 N. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred «. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed acid constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the rase of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requrements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, pnor to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED / / / I / / -/-/- / / / /~ / / ~~ /~ ~~ ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS August 17, 2004 Freeway 15 Business Center Partnership S/end of Charles Smith SUBTPM16714, DRC2004-00564, & DRC2004-00171 w° r THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gudelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commeraal/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i. At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways n. At intersections m On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a faality or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of requred fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances ~ ~~ 8~ The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflect a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system i~ accordance with NFPA 13 with central station momtonng This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. ~.. 5. On all site plans to be submitted far review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site ~~"' FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specfications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping' Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans ' FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code; and/or any oth~ applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Group "A" Occupancies 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons 4 All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (see Fire Access) 5 When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 6 When the building access does not meet the regwrements of the 2001 Califorrna Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the Califorrna Bwlding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Califorrna Fire Code Prior to the installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwiding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 ~ ~E ga FSC-6 Fire District Site Access • Fire District access roadways include public roads, 'streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet r r b The maximum inside turn radws shall li'e'24-feet c The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent • h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all required openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width ~~~y~ When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not regwred to be motorized 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits ~Mi~. Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products Application of Flammable Finishes Automobile Wrecking Yards Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants Dust-Produang Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Frwt Ripening Plants Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Magnesium Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating . Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Speaal Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be~ required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility ~ ~~9a 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property rn writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied wdh the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials m accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application ~„ / Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted~on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 rewew fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access: a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwldmg, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for rewew and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemardmo To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a. The current title report to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement The assessors parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement. The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or /~ ~~R3 b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adtacent properties, or' . d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the prroate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. , Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9~1, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All requred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded wit. the County of San Bernardino /°v ~'~9~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflectroe Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, de~{ehoper, and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the 4est A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow availabl2 The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate'of Occupancy, the fire alarin system shall be installed, inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested, and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&Rs, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial ~7C~ ~~ and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Insp,~,ctor 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 YZ" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector ~1 LJ ~ ~~ 9~ RESOLUTION NO 04-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00564, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 3 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 15,501 SQUARE FEET ON 1 48 ACRE OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-321-21 A Recitals r r 1 Cecil R Camey filed an applicatwn fb~approval of DRC2004-00564, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On December 8, 2004, the Planning G`ommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to the development of three industnal buildings on 1 48 acre of land at the southern terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, and b The property to the north of the subtect site has an approved entitlement for five industnal buildings, the property to the west is improved with an industrial bwlding, and to the south and east of the site is the I-15 Freeway, and c The site is a remnant grape vineyard that is vacant and presently composed of invasive, weedy vegetation, and d The applicant is proposing to construct tilt-up concrete buildings for light industnal uses, a permitted use within the Industnal Park Distnct, and e The protect, togethervnth the recommended conditions of approval, complies wdh all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and f The protect will prowde industnal faalities for a vanety of small-scale industnal uses, a land use goal of the Industnal Park Distnct, and ~ ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 2 g The proiect design incorporates an outdoor employee eating area, the use of two pnmary matenals, spandrel and reflective glass, and a tower element on each building, thereby, meeting the design goals of the Industnal Park Distnct by providing ahigh-level of architectural design 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specficalty finds and concludes as follows "'" a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan and Development Code, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is incompliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherHnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a ~ ` That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance v~nth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wdl result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~ ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnna Department 1) A Uniform Sign Program for the proled shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval The Umfortn Sign Program shall be submitted pnor to bwldmg permit issuance / 2) Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptaGes, bollards, etc) shall be uniform 3) All conditions from Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 shall apply. 4) On Buildings A, B, and C, the tower element shall include a decoratroe cornice, and the wall planes at the tower element shall have reveals in a block pattern, per the plans on-file with the Planning Drv~sion 5) The existing chain link fence on the east property line shall be replaced with a wrought iron fence, thereby, providing continwty of fenung • matenals with the existing wrought fence along the west property line The developer shall have the option to use a concrete ttlt-up wall or a combination of wrought iron fence and tilt-up wall The final design of the cornice, wall/fence, spacing, and matenals wdl be subtect to City Planner review and approval dunng plan check 6) Decorative pedestnan paving with score lines shall be provided at the ~ employee outdoor eating area of each bwldmg Enaineennp Department 1) Install pnvate storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drains The cost of pnvate storm drains shall be borne by this development a) For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capaaty to handle Q,oo and a secondary overFlow shall be provided to handle the O~oo if the sump outlet is plugged b) Sumps in the pnvate storm dram system shall be designed for Q,~ and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches in automobile parking areas and 18 inches in truck parking areas 2) Development wdl be regwred to install all missing public improvements • Charles Smith Avenue public improvements shall include curb and gutter, pavement, sidewalk, dnve approaches, drainage devices, streetlights, and street trees per Gty standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer ~ ~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 4 a) Install street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a speaes and spaced in accordance with the City's street tree program b) Construct dnve approaches in accordance v~nth Standard Drav~nng No 101, Type C, minimum 35 feet wide c) Relocate one existing 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlight out of the proposed new dnveway location Provide up to four additional 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights (if not p~$viously installed) ~ ~ ,,,,~~ d) Provide and/or protect existing street improvements including traffic signing and stnping, R26 "NO PARKING" signs, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement, storm drains, and drainage facilities, etc ' 3) The Caltrans area to the east of the property and adtacent to the southbound I-15 freeway may need to be landscaped in accordance with Caltrans specifications Contact Caltrans (Distnct 8) about their highway planting improvement agreements The applicant shall secure an agreement with Caltrans to provde all necessary landscape and imgation to the I-15 Freeway landscaped area, and to provide maintenance service in accordance with the Caltrans regwrements and for all expenses thereof 4) On-site storm drains shall be pnvately maintained to their connection points on the mainline (street function structures) Provide a drainage study for on-site storm drain system, include all flows tnbutary from the properties to the north Pnvate storm drains with sump catch basins shall be designed to handle O~oo Provide secondary overflow routes for all sump catch basins including sump trench dram type basin. In sump catch basin conditions, the maximum ponding for on-site stone drains at O~~ shall be 12 inches in automobile travel and parking areas and 18 inches in truck travel and parking areas 5) The parcel is sub/ed to storm water overflow drainage per Covenant recorded January 28, 1997, as per Instrument No 97-0029486 The surface overflow drainage easement shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in the sump catch basin on Charles Smith Avenue and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls or other obstructions placed across the easement a) Provide/obtain a surface overflow drainage easementvnth the sde to the west to be graded too convey overflows in the event of blockage in the pnvate sump catch basin at the south end of Parcel 3 (SUBTPM 16714) and make provisions for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capaaty to handle O,oo and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the Quo, if the sump outlet is plugged ~ ~G boa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 5 b) If the sump catch basin in Charles Smith Avenue were to become blocked, the overflow surface drainage would breach the street right-of-way and could inundate the probed site or portions thereof Provide an easement in favor of the City for storm drain overflow surface drainage across the protect property. Surface overflow shall be conveyed to the existing drainage easement comdor across the site to the west (Bradshaw) and the Costco Ili site into 4th Street 6) Obtain permission from the a~ltacent property owner(s), and provide proof of such to City, to enter and construct storm drain faa6hes across any portion of their property. 7) An easement for a toint use dn'veway and drive aisle between the three proposed parcels shall be completed and shown on the final map prior to issuance of budding permits 8) Maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan t1NQMP) shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) The responsible party for Operation and Maintenance of these shall record with the County of San Bernardino the appropriate WQMP Template Attachment included with the Model Water Quality Management Plan Gwdance Handout 9) Adequate provisions and appropriate permit(s),shall be obtained v~nth Caltrans to grade, accept, and dispose of surface drainage within their adtacent right-of-way or entering the project site from Caltrans to a point of discharge of Caltrans' choice or other public storm drain faality ` as approved by the City Engineer Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Gty verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Cbnstruction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment v~nll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Qualty Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff ~~ ~Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 6 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • ~ Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time ' • Schedule activities to mirnmize the amounts of exposed excavaied soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance v~nth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adiacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high vends (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance ~nnth Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactnre for 96 hours or more to reduce PMro emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use ~ ~ ~`D~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY • December 8, 2004 Page 7 10) All industrial and commeraal faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industnal and commeraal faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industnal and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more empbyees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industnal and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stopping . Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wall • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwn: incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse probed effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropnate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, ~ ~j6103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY December 8, 2004 Page 8 with ongmal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruGion field survey of the proleG site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological momtonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must mGude, but not be limited to, the following measuresf / Assign a paleontological~momtor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construGion and notify the rriomtor of the find Submit a summary repbrt to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated ~nnth vehiGe tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inacive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submR to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities enlenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical ~ ~~~o~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY • December 8, 2004 Page 9 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included m grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) SpeGfy the timing of grading and construction to mmim¢e soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or~off-site as a result of this ' iemediation or restoration program protect wdl be corrected through a vnthin a specified time frame , 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning v~nll be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) SD-10 Site Design -Parking lot grading wdl be designed to direct on- • site flows through a filtering system (See MP-40 below) before discharging to the local street. 6) SD-12 -Efficient Imgation - To reduce the amount of nwsance flows and the accompanying transport of sedimert or waste, effiGent imgation design and methods wdl be employed 7) SD-13 Storm Dram Signs - As a deterrent against the dumping of waste and chemicals, appropnate storm dram signs will be painted on all drainage inlets 8) SD-32 Trash Enclosures -Each parcel will have a constructed trash enclosure to reduce the dispersion of trash 9) MP-40 Media Filter-Runoff is expected to leave the individual parcels via curb drains, which can have media filters inserted for the collection of debns, trash, sediment and/or sods 10) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits • 11) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the probed where appropnate Measures that maybe ~~ ~Q~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-121 DRC2004-00564- CECIL R CARNEY • December 8, 2004 Page 10 used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration inGude Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 12) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submd to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply vnth obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from thd""State Water Resources Control Board Evidence tha} this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C ~ ~~~ /OG City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project Fde No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16714 and Development Review DRC2004-00564 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implemenLng the mitigabon measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declafation fortfteabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to,ensure t at adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has~been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form wdi be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ ~~ ~~ Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM16714 AND DRC2004-00564 Page 2 • 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for theµspecific phase of development ~ 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forin 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that requre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indroidual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits C~ /~ ~~ /OS ~ i i MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Maa SUBTPM16714 and Develoament Review DRC2004-00564 Applicant: Cecil R. Carnev Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Assistant Planner Date: June 28. 2004 W .. ~ .. -. ~ . .. Air Quality .. .~ ,~~ .i t.,~, ,,;- , ~r,<~.~.; .,~~- ~*~-+~.~ ~c_ ~ , ..,,,, .~-,,-~.~ ;;•, r All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficaUon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South - Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as Cdy Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions 1 of 8 • .. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City rf sdt is carried over to ad/acent public construction - thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction _ _ Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction _ areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 0 2~ W ~- •. .. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commeraal faalities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods Q e , m excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Revew of plans AIC 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D _ 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to configure their _ operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting _ heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters _ All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C 2l4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will - retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will - • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Review of report AID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value 3of8 ~(Q 9.. .. . ~ ~. ~. • Consider establishing provisions to require CPIBO C Review of report AID 3l4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's CPIBO C Review of report AID 3l4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A!D - 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report '0JD 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent ' archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall - submit a report of findings that will also provide specific I recommendationsregardingfurthermitigahonmeasures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be - appropnate W here mdigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being Geared BO BIC Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately droert construction and notify the monitor of the find 4 'CC i .... .. Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a - copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods ~' ~ ~+_ '- -, .:" - ~~~~ - . I The sde shall be treated wdh water or other sod- BO C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) construction - daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes - .- Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ; ,.k: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent pracbcal 5of8 W '~ .. .. .. ~ -. ' • ~ . .. . . An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading - This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of j grading and construction to minim¢e sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Califorrna, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff - - Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C - - 2/4 cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site _ SD-10 Sde Design -Parking lot grading wdl be designed BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC ~ 214 _ to direct on-site flows through a filtering system (See - MP-40 below) before discharging to the local street SD-12 -Efficient Irrigation - To reduce the amount of BO B/CID Review of plans A/C _ 2/4 nwsance flows and the accompanying transport of sediment or waste, efficient irrigation design and methods wdl be employed SD-13 Storm Drain Signs - As a deterrent against the BO B/C/D Review of plans AlC f 2/4 dumping of waste and chemicals, appropriate storm drain signs wili be painted on all drainage inlets SD-32 Trash Enclosures -Each parcel will have a BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 constructed trash enclosure to reduce the dispersion of trash 6 l~$ `C~ s . ... .. .. ... .. . . .... .. . .: : . MP-40 Media Filter -Runoff is expected to leave the BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 individual parcels via curb drains, which can have media filters inserted for the collection of debris, trash, sediment and/or soils Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of ferthzers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to - ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where - appropnate Measures that may be used to mmimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National .~ Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit # 7of8 Key to Checklist Abbrevtattons Responsible Person MorUtoring Frequency'. Metfiod~of Verification= _ ~ Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bulding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certifcate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submdtal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposd or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee - 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-revs-04final doc - - ` - i • a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2004-00564 ~ / SUBJECT: THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS_~_ ~ _ APPLICANT: CECIL R CARNEY LOCATION: APN 0229-321-21 ' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 01-121, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Completion Date / / / / / / / / -/-/- ~~~~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00564 Comolehon Date D. E. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/ State Fue Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _I_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _I_I_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect ad/scent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _!_/_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ pro/ections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad/scent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraal and industrial pro/ects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _I_/_ a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_~ contain a 12-inch walk ad/scent to the parking stall (including curb) ~ ~~~rg 2 Proiecl No DRC2004-00564 Comoletton Date F G. 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped Trip Reduction ~, Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercal, offipe, industrial, and multifamily residential pro/ects of more than 10 units Mimmvm spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent ofthe required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Landscaping 1 A detatled landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial pro/acts, and a mrnimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, properly owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and ~,~E// 9 / / / / I I / / 1 / -/-/- / / -/-/- / / / / / / -/-/- Protect No DRC2004-00564 Comole4on Date H. maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems requued to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenancewareas, the _I_I_ destgn shall be coordinated with the Engineering DiYision designed to conserve water through the prinaples of ing and irrigation shall be 11 Landsca _/_/_ , p Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 12 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the _/_/_ freeway nght-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shalt be prepared to conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way Signs , 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_~ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _/_/_ approval pnor to issuance of budding permds Environmental 1 Mlttgation measures are requred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provde a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permds ~ ~siav 4 Protect No DRC2004-00564 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEWIS) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, r r , d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, ~ ~~' "• e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddionrng, and g Planning Department Pro/ect Number (DRC2004-00564) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect'slEngineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -- _/ / the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~ -/-/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the -/-/- Building and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be -/~/- marked with the pro/ect file number (DRC2004-00564) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or -/-/- matoraddition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map -/-/- recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays ~~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00564 Comolehon Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _I_l~ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant Improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, CdyGrading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading'plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/~ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permts 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined`cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California fegistered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Recprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/_/_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of budding permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ' _/_/_ s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map _, 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map ~~ /~a- Proiecl No DRC2004-00564 ComoleGOn Date • P. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limped to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Charles Smith Avenue (b) X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Traffic signing and stnpmg as requred Improvement Plans and Construction r ) a Street Improvement plans, Including streeC trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic'signal'plans shall be prepared by a registered Clwl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the pu6hc and/or pnvate street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Pnor to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty' Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduct shall be Instaged to the satisfaction of the Cdy Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro/ect along mayor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shalt be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the CIty Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer I g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be - Installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program / / -/-/- I / / / -/-/- / / I / _/-/. / / / / ~~~~ Prgect No DRC2004-00564 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size l]ty Chades Smith Avenue Brachychiton populneus Bottle tree 5 ft 25 ft o c 15ya1 Fdl-in Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutnent deficiencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Q. R. S. T. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacent areas Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for Parcel Mao SUBTPM16714 Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Disfrict, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Comole6on Date _/_/. / / / / / / / / / / / / 8 Protect No DRC2004-00564 Comole6on Date • i Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diberted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City FPrm CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to BuOding and Safety Form CD=2 shall be submitted to the Eng~neenng Dvision within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shalt have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighttng to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, wdh duect lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting to exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures W. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches bf any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices X. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibdtty Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / I / ~ ~'~~ a.s RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS August 17, 2004 Freeway 15 Business Center Partnership S/end of Charles Smith SUBTPM16714, DRC2004-00564, & DRC2004-00171, "' ,, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gudelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spaang and IocaUon of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustnal protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways ii At intersections w On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Prowde one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Append III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances ~ ~~~~~ 2 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects • a 50-percent reduction for the installation of 'an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Budding permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. µ. 5 On all site plans tq be submitted for, review, show all fire ~iydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site ~~" FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code, and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Group "A" Occupancies 3 "E" Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons 4 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 5 When requred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 6 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to the installation of the building fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction . Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 f3 ~~ ia-7 2 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are ~., a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 4'5-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% . Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or ma/or fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all requred openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward • b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of requved width ~3 ~~ ~a-8 c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet ~~ L~ Gates are not required to be motorized Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits ~, Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with tl~e business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required wdh'the permd application for approval of the permd, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property , • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogerncs Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Fruit Ripening Plants Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Speaal Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or FUr Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility ~ ~~~/2~9 2 Any busmess that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property m writing stating that the busmess is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied wdh th~ provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5 working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buddmgs and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials m accordance with the 2001 California Bwldmg, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construcbon Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement. The plan as submitted indicate that the requred Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property Ime; or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoGation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal• a. The current title report to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwre~ private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or /J~~ /vU Crosses a property line, or c Prowde service to adiacent properties, or ' d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino , , Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard C'brrdrtions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: ~ , 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans; specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwldmg & Safety Diwsion and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber,is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved ~n accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino ~~ ~ l31 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnn~kler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perrorm the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subtect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspecte~ tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipmen is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be, inspected, tested, and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&Rs, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all requred fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will b required on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commera~ l~ ~~/3a- and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites • 10 Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business ,Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Ins~,ector 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of/Occupancy, a 8 '/:" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • ~~~ /3 3 ,$ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE December 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Emily Wimer, Associate Planner II~rv SUBJECT• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16574 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES - A request to subdivide 90 acre into 4single-family lots in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7388 Teak Way APN 1077-041-56 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES - A review of 4 single-family homes on 90 acre of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7388 Teak Way APN 1077-041-56 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 51 dwelling units per acre Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -\ Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Teak Way -Single-family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unit per acre) West - Single-faintly homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • C General Plan Designations Qrotect Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Teak Way -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D Site Charactenstics The site on the east portion of the site located on site that will be re existing single-faintly housing ANALYSIS is predominantly vacant with asingle-family home located that is proposed for demolition A few scattered trees are noved at the time of grading The parcel is bounded by A General The developer is proposing 4 single-faintly lots averaging with 2,365 square foot homes The neighborhood is predominantl The applicant is proposing all single-story floor plans, with two rev ITEMS "C" & "F" 9,763 50 square feet y single-story homes erse footpnnts The PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16574 - DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES December 8, 2004 Page 2 Development Code does not regwre a minimum number of floor plans because the application is only four lots The applicant has submitted for Design Review of the project as well, however, a review of the elevations is not required for four homes or less The applicant has worked with staff to incorporate window shutters, pot shelves, mullions, and rockwork to all homes B Design Review Committee The Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, BulfSr) reviewed the project on October 19, 2004, and recommended A~pproval subtect to several small revisions The applicant agreed to the fewsions, as v4ell as adding courtyard areas to the front elevations of the homes C Technical Review Committee The Committee Reviewed the protect on October 19, 2004 The protect was conceptually approved ' D Tree Removal Permit The applicant submitted a tree removal permit for approximately four trees, which will be replaced on site in the front yard area of the homes All other trees that are not located within the footprint of the homes, will be kept on-site. E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on October 14, 2004, at City Hall A total of four residents attended, and they were generally accepting of the lots, . as well as the architectural style of the homes CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site ' RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommends approval through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, B City Planner BB.EW\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16574 Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C"- Exterior Elevations Exhibit "D"- Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit "E" - Design Review Committee Action Comments Dated October 19, 2004 Draft Resolution of Approval for SUBTPM16574 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2004-00692 . C ~l' ~ • i • ~~ i ! ~ o z 6 ~ ~~ t ~ ¢¢~~ ~ i~i ! ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ e, ~~ ~ ~ ~ t l ~ ~ i 1 1 i ~ ~ : E I ~ ~ (~ 1 ~ f i I ~°' ~ op (I ( _ a ~~ ~ ~- y Ii/ ~ ~ ~~~ ' A~ ~ ~®~ y l lF' ~ ~ ~f , g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ .-l U '~~ ---e o ; '! ~ ' ~9 ~ 1 E ~` ~~ m ~ ! ~E a __ ~ -~----C~ti- ~ ~; lie$ e~Qe ~ B ~-+ E L] 5 ~ L Q E ~~ • , I a Z ~ a~ I ~ ' -- ~ F~-_--,, _ i FI --- ~ N~ ~- r P ~ ~ - I /i Y i /r/! a r ~ \ ~ ~~~ t ~ - ~--"- ~ E e~ ~ `o'3?JH -I`d111~13a153?J --y ~ ~ _~~ _ ----e- I1 ,, !~ ~ ~`L~~~~----- ~E I z ~~~bl~ I ~ .- ~ ' ~, bi{ ,,~n EE ; EI l ~ m~ - i EI Et EE ~ E `~~~ v r c~~3 E _ __J ~ -- ~ ~ rEl ,. ~ser.m.aw ~ °vL iY°RNtiq jE d° 1 ~ I ~~.~....,.,~.._ ~ ~~i1~~~1~~1~ ~ p~yyjp [~ g 8g6ya ~ J Q0116WlIAYJ LLl°IV'91f ~~ ail I I I I I 1HYlG0.utWI-rtWl vvy' ~~PO 2 E `°~~ »~ Gsa Q>mCY H ..m.a s '° 's w~ ~ .,,.n.. $~~ 3 ~ ~1 e~~ j u ~~ [ ;~ ~ r=~I~ E, ~~ ~ i °~3 ` ~ ~.~rl ax z gss •< yy gg i~ ~ C3 g g ~ ~ f~l8 ~~ ~4 ~~~~es t~lF 44§ € kE I .. ,1, ` ~ I ' ~---- -_-_~- _ f Y ~ ~~il {` I t ' -- ~ `~ LIII 1 tl _- -JIy31-,1'SLLti~-~ ~} Y ' LIII r ~ ~ is I ~C L9Y4 '° f 1~~ ... ~p 1 ~` ~ ~ I~ ,v.~+nu, z , 3+,..'~i~ a §, rwa. iii ~ 16~, ~.n`s .'",''' ~~ .U~.'~f~'ik •.'v,~i l iii a - ~--- " 'L --- : = ij ~'p'lEi -___ $~` ~ I a - ---AVM YV31 _ _ al: ( ~ ~ III ~ 4 _ _ ~~' ~ -_ 1 I ~g v~ d SS333` \t III - _,_..~~ ~\ 1T e',`; ;; ,,. ., \.~ $' sR ~ ~ 0_ l ~ II; , ~ i., hi . , ,,,v ~ v ~ , J~ , ~ y .;.;.,,~,,,~~~ I L 5 @ p i , ,11 ~\\\~ 1 ~ . O Yt ; AR_' n t . ~ ti~OYw Ml1 ' ~ I TiIF ~ .U:, `i t\ v.S.'Tt tFi _ I ~ las~ E~,a a,~h~ ' it,` ,t Ilj I ~ III I \L III III w I I - III W~ ~ I ' ~ ~2 z~ Ilj III No~ t 1~ ' G ° {~I o ~ - Z ° °I '" 5 ~n I --- --- anv aai eI' - - - - -- - - ~ ~pd ' ------ ~ ~ \ ' i °° ~ - - - l i r ~ ~ X hibi ' p ~ g ~ ') ~= .~ NI ~, ~~ ASR t Y. vti~,i T~., 9!E'" .' v.~ it qvj'~. ~- - ... -, `~ - -- - - C~F~ ~' E~ Ie N j 4 -- - _ - _ ,~ r IJ C U __ _ ~l= - \Y - 4 --- ~ 1--~ of _r ~~, , ' ~ I '~ - 1 \ ` - _ ``-- ~; I --- I • I• Ye pp I oa.rsv YOOaura ~ qii gigsq iy (V sam~rxa inn wnivarnw~ tli ~ ~i ~~a~~m~~cv.`u~ 15~0~~~ ~D91~ f~3~1~1~ ~ Y Q e ~~0~ ~0~~ er p N Z Q F W F 1 wom so~...sr. yz_ S 1-~' ,~ i ----~-- i ~ ~ I _-\7un~no-__ --. '~1 _ _ ~I .~"" xsaz e ------ ,,l , ~ I, I . ;e ~I ., i '~~ I '1 c~ I p I ~i~ `EI ~ i--,~I. ___-__-__~ '6 II ~ol~ II ~ ~ 9~'r - ~ ~i Is 3 . ~ ~- _ - _ 3AV 3YINS~2 _ _ _ ~__wuso_- _. -- _€q~ ------ EE - _ \\ // F~Cln~b'i ~ D ~ yn I~ ~ i . @p ~ ~ vp I ~Itl>•I~•II~I~I~ -)1~bli ___ (611 __ __ -~r~l~f•.Nl~ T _~~f-u~ M i ~ c ~` i .. ,_ ~, i -- - - i F i I~8 I~ l =-~ --- v ~~( ~rE W"/ _- ..- ~¢~~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~~° ~ a~~ ~ ~ 1 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 9 00 p m Emily Wimer October 19, 2004 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16574 -MARTINEZ PROPERTIES - A request to subdivide 90 acre into four single-family lots in the Low Residential District, located at 7388 Teak Way - APN 1077-041-56 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00692 -MARTINEZ PROPERTIES -A review of•foursingle- famdy homes on 90 acre of land in the Low Residential District, located at 7388 Teak Way - APN 1077-041-56 ~ "~' Desion Parameters• This corner property totals 90 acre The neighborhood is predominantly one-story homes Located on-site is one single-family home which will be demolished. The applicant is proposing to remove nine trees which are located within the footpnnt of the homes, three of the trees are heritage trees and wdl requue replacement per the Tree Preservation Ordinance The developer is proposing four single-family lots averaging 9,763 50 square feet The applicant is proposing all one-story floor plans, and two reverse footprints The Development Code does not regwre a minimum number of floor plans because the application is only four lots The applicant has requested to submit for design review of the protect, however, it is not regwred The applicant has worked with staff to incorporate window shutters, pot shelves, mullions, and rockwork to all homes Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues. The following broad design issues wdl be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project Is there sufficient architectural vanety~ Lots 2 and 4 will incorporate ledge stone, Lots 1 and 3 will incorporate stacked stone rock veneer Separate color schemes wdl help provide variation as well The homes facing public view (Lots 2 and 4) have been upgraded with additional eves and window detail Because the site is only four homes, the Committee shall review and deade whether or not movement of the footprint is necessary to create less of a box like footpnnt. 2 Does the single footprint provide sufficient architectural interest in form and massing The rear of the house is a simple box without any articulation The Committee should provide direction whether their policy encouraging articulation applies to single-story homes Although no floorplans were provided (see Roof Plan for an indication of interior layout), it should be possible to introduce apop-out element Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 To create casual variation between the four homes, provide a low wall and courtyard area on two of the four homes (see attached example) ~Xh~bit `'~,~ C ~r~ °l DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16574 AND DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES October 19, 2004 Page 2 2 Because of the large expanse of driveway for the three car garages, scored and textured concrete shall be provided for all dnveways 3 Continue the rock work on all pilasters all the way to the roof eaves Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion ~, ~, 1 Construct decorative block walls along interior side and rear property lines, and decorative return walls between homes, rather than wood fencing, for permanence, durability, and design consistency Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a matenal more durable than wood gates (acceptable gate materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC) All block walls facing public view shall be constructed of decorative matenal including a tnm cap detail. 2. Replacement trees are required at a one to one ratio, minimum 15-gallon sized Uee for all hentage trees removed Chimneys should be designed consistent with the architectural style of the homes Although not shown on Elevations, the Roof Plan indicates that homes will have a fireplace Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee review the protect in light of the Mator issue and Secondary Issues and recommend review and approval by the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Buller, Fletcher, McPhail Staff Planner Emily Wimer The architect presented revised elevations which incorporated courtyard areas on the front elevation of the homes The Committee then approved the protect subtect to the conditions as noted below Provide two separate roof colors which contrast differently from the onginal proposed colors 2 Provide stone detail under the main window on the front elevation on all four homes 3 Provide decorative front door entnes on all four homes. Provide brushed and stamped concrete with borders on each driveway for all four homes Provide individual landscaping palates for each home pnor to approval of construction drawings ~~F ~ RESOLUTION NO 04-122 A Rentals A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16574, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 4 LOTS ON 90 ACRES OF LAND, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 1077-041-56 1 Martinez Properties LLC filed an application for th~e~approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16574, as descnbed m the title of tNis~Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at 7388 Teak Way with a street frontage of approximately 331 feet and lot depth of 149 feet and is presently improved with curb and gutter only, and residential, and The property to the north, south, east, and west of the subtect site is single-family c The application is to subdwide approximately 90 acre of land into four parcels consistrng of the following square footages, and Parcel 1 9,600 square feet Parcel 2 9,600 square feet Parcel 3 9,600 square feet Parcel 4 10,254 square feet Average Parcel size in square feet 9,763 5 square feet d The applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-01205 forthe removal of five Hentage trees on-site, and C~F9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-122 SUBTPM16574 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC December 8, 2004 Page 2 Access onto all four lots will be from Ironwood Street 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent v~nth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and r b The design or improvements of'the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mfury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property wnthin the proposed . subdivision 4 The Planning Commission hereby determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15315 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) The application is a subdmsion of property into four parcels in an urbanized area zoned for residential use, no variances or exceptions are required, all utility services and street access to the protect site are available and meet local standards, the property was not subdivided in the past two years, and the property does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) No block walls shall be installed within the front yard area except in conformance with Gty standards The proper Ime-of-sight shall be provided for drivers egressmg onto Ironwood Street or Teak Way 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-01205 is hereby approved for the removal of 51 trees identified in the arbonst report (Knapp, August 2003) subted to replacement at a 1 1 ratio, 15-gallon minimum The location and speaes shall be included m the detailed Landscape Plan to be approved by the Cdy Planner G ~~ia PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-122 SUBTPM16574 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC December 8, 2004 Page 3 Enpineennq Diwsion 1) Special Conditions a) Lots 1 and 2 shall drain to Ironwood Street b) Lot 4 shall have a 5-foot drainage easement at the rear of the lot, in favor of Lot 3, to allow drainage to Teak Way Drainage from only one lot (Lot 3) shall flow through only one other lot (Lot 4) Cross-lot drainage shall be contained in aconcrete/rock fined Swale or reinforced concrete pipe (12 inches minimum diameter) c) House and dnve approach on Lot 1 shall be located as Gose to the east property line as possible, because of line-of-site concerns with existing landscaping on ad/scent property to the west d) Owner of Lot 4 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said Lot along Teak Way e) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to . 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages f) Single-family residential pro/ects, up to four units, are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program Nevertheless, pnor to the issuance of budding permits, the "Exempt Protects" form shall be submitted to the Engineenng Diwsion when the first budding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety '6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chavrnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary • I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit c ~~ ii PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-122 SUBTPM16574 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC . December 8, 2004 Page 4 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ ~,, C~ G ~Fl a- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME T STANDARD CONDITIONS µ PROJECT #: SUBTPM16574 ~ SUBJECT: FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS APPLICANT: MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TEAK WAY AND IRONWOOD STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YDUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-122 and Standard Condtions, shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the constructionlgrading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code i Comoletion Date / / / / / / / / SC-11-04 1 c~~~3 Prgect No SUBTPM76574 Completion Date D. APPL COM NOTE: E. 1 2 3 4. 5 F. SI 1 SC-1-04 2 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~=~ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwiding permits 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/~_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the„,tssuance of building permits I (CANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR PLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air ° conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM16574) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~_/_ the City prior to permit issuance Separate permits are regwred for fenang and/or walls ~~_ Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements 'te Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~ /~ marked with the project file number (i e , SUBTPM16574) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Division for availability of ~~~/~ Project No SUBTPM76574 Comolehon Date the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limded to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school tees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Droision prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ___/~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits G. New Structures wµ, 1 Prowde compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. ~~_ 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/_ Health Services prior to issuance of bwlding permits H. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Calfomia Building Code, City Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work _/_/_ 3 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 4 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for ~_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califonia registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, ~~_ community tratls, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~~_ street centerline) 30 total feet on Teak Wav ~_/_ 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -J-, SC-1-04 ~/~ Protect No SUBTPM76574 Completion Dete J. 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map ' 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interiorstreets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any budding sernce equipment whichris regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In adc~iticn'to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Ironwood Street X X X X Teak Way (f) X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) ADA ramp at Ironwood Street, (f) Construct C & G at removed drive approach Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer _/_/~ -~-~- ~~_ -~~. ~-~ L J ~-~_ ~~ -~~- / / i SC-1-04 c ~~ i~ Project No SUBTPM16574 Completion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 20( feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Cih Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Cary roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refundec upon complebon of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer ~,,~, g Concentrated'drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Ciry Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a mwmum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards to accordance with the Citys street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on 'the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spaefng Size Gty Teak Way Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20' O C 15 Gal Fill In Ironwood Street Tree Selection to match existing street trees on specified street Refer to ~ ~ Approved Street Tree List for Rancho Cucamonga for additional tree information, such as O C spacing and size Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Cary inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) Ail street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only K. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Cary Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer _/~_ ~~- ~~- ~~ _/-1- _/_1_ -/-J- SC-1-04 C Cj~C ~ Prgect No SUBTPM16574 ComoleLOn Date L. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/~_ property from adfacent areas ' M. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, ~~_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for All Dublic improvements N. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitaryf~sewerage system, water, gas, ~~ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all'%underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/~_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ~_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects , 0. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/~ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to budding permti issuance rf no map is involved SC-1-04 ~%~ / 0 C` RESOLUTION NO 04123 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00692, LOCATED AT 7388 TEAK WAY IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE),AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-041-56 A Recitals ~, 1 Martinez Properties LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2004-00692, as described in the ,title of this Resolution ~ Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subled Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 8th day of December 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on December 8, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 7388 Teak Way with a stn;etfrontage of approximately 331 feet and lot depth of approximately 149 feet and is presently improved wdh curb and gutter only, and b The property to the south, east, and west of the subject site is single-family residential, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on October 14, 2004, to inforrn the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain feedback, and e The application proposes the development of single-story homes on lots similar in size to the surrounding neighborhood 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the . above-referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and c~F /9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-123 DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES December 8, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vnll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally mjunous- to properties or improvements m the vicinity ~ 4. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEC]A Guidelines (Class 32 Exemption '~ In-fill Developments) The application is a subdivision of property into four parcels m an urbanized area zoned for residential use, no vanances or exceptions are required, all utility services and street access to the protect site are available and meet local standards, the property was not subdivided in the past two years, and the property does not have average slope greater than 20 percent , 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below . and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnng Department 1) All Conditions of Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16574 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-01205 shall apply 2) No block walls shall be installed within the front yard area except in ~ conformance with City standards The proper line-of-sight shall be provided for dnvers egressmg onto Ironwood or Teak Way 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-01205 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site The applicanUdevelopershatl be required to remove, relocate, and replace trees The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading permits 4) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall material, subtect to review and approval by the City Planner 5) The applicant shall obtain wntten permission from adtacent property owners for any off-site grading pnor to issuance of grading permits 6) Two separate roof colors shall be provided, which contrast differently from the onginal proposed colors 7) Stone detail shall be provided under the main v~nndow on the front elevation on all four homes 8) Decorative front door entnes shall be provided on all four homes C ~~ao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-123 DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES . December 8, 2004 Page 3 9) Prowde brushed and stamped concrete with borders on each dnveway for all four homes, as well as individual landscaping palates for each home pnor to approval of construction drawings Enoineennq Deaarfinent 1) Speaal Conddwns w,~, a) Lots 1 and 2 shall dram to Ironwood Street b) Lot 4 shall have a 5-foot drainage easement at the rear of the lot, in favor of Lot 3, to allow drainage to Teak Way Drainage from only one lot (Lot 3) shall flow through only one other lot (Lot 4). Cross-lot drainage shall be contained in aconcrete/rock lined swale or reinforced concrete pipe (12 inches minimum diameter) c) House and dnve approach on Lot 1 shall be located as close to the east property line as possible, because of line-of-site concerns with existing landscaping on adtacent properly to the west • d) Owner of Lot 4 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said Lot along Teak Way e) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages f) Single-family residential protects, up to four units, are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion ~ ~ Program Nevertheless, pnor to the issuance of budding pennds, the "Exempt Protects" form shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Buller, Secretary C ~G~l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-123 DRC2004-00692 - MARTINEZ PROPERTIES December 8, 2004 ' Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~ ~ r .,,, • u ~~%aa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS w, PROJECT #: DRC2004-006'92 ~ SUBJECT: FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TEAK WAY AND IRONWOOD STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comolehon Date • A. General Requirements 1 The appltcant shall agree to defend at hts sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of DRC2004-00692 is granted sub/ect to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map / / SUBTPM16574 _ _ _ - 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-123 and Standard _/_/_ Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations sc-,,.04 ~~'f' ~ 3 Protect No DRC2004-00692 Completion Date 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be . submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Developm$'nt Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community orr6peafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance ~ ' „~ 6 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such a5 transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in'underground vaults 8 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape ~ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of building permits 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad/pining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter ~ 11 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property Imes), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 12 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 13 For residential development, return walls and corner sidewalls shall be decorative masonry _/ /_ 14 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Oily Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _1_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated SC-11-04 ~ ~~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00692 Comole4on Date with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwiding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdwiston 2 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtac2nt to and long structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of budding 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover far erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or'greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent trngation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each indiwdual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and trrigatton shall be requred per the Development Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Diwston 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer G. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pennits SC-11-04 c~r ~," -~ ~- / / / / / / -~-~- / / / / Protect No DRC2004-00692 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, w,. c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, ~,, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the stze of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ime diagrams, f Plumbrng and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00692) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Archdect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Ctty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _I_ the Ctty pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permtts are regwred for Penang and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Developers wishing to partiapate rn the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) aan _/_/ contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/ /~ marked with the protect file number (t e , DRC2004-00692) The applicant shall complywlth the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permd application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabdityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permtts for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Constructton and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Butlding and Safety Offiaal after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permtts 4 Constructton activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _!_/~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-11-04 4 ~~Fa~ Proled No DRC2004-00692 ComoleGon Date New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for regwred occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions K. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code~Cdy Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in '~Ilbstantlal conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Buldng and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centedine) 30 total feet on Teak Wav 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be gwtclaimed or delinea)ed on the final map SC-11-04 c~~ a~ / / / I I / / / _/-/. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2004-00692 Comolehon Date M. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefaalities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentatroe map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees Pursuant to City Counal Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Counal, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of ~if~provements as required by conditions of approval of development , In no as$e shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completioh'and acceptance of all improvements requred by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Ironwood Street X X X X Teak Way (f) X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item fe) ADA ramp at Ironwood Street ff) Construct C & G at removed drive approach Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shalt be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied / /~ / / / / / / ! / / / / / SC-11-04 5 c~,~Fa~" Protect No DRC2004-00692 ComoleUOn Date e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requinng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer i Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficienaes may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program I 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed, per the notes and legend on sheet 1 Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans Min Grow Street Name 6otaniwl Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Teak Way Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20'O C 15 Gal Fill in Ironwood Street Tree selection to match existing street trees on specified street Refer to Approved Street Tree List for Rancho Cucamonga for additional tree information, such as O C spaang and size Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin andlor form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adfacent areas P. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for all public improvements SC-11-04 ~'Ai ~' ~ I / / / / / I I / / / /_/ Project No DRC2004-00692 Comolehon Date ~ . Q. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final rnep approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential I i~ protects ~ R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_I_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance tf no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures -/ T. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors -/-/- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors Ifwindows are within _/_I_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ U. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be irfted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ wsibdity APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-04 8 C ~~ vo • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 18, 2004 Martinez Properties L L C Ironwood & Teakwood Sub-division for (4) SFR SUBTPM16574 My„~ THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this protect is 1000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is~made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances For structures m excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 3 On the site plans to be subrrutted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. Additional hydrants may be required at the time of public water plan submittal Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire COiIS[NCUOn Services 2. Address: Note on the plans that pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-farruly dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. ~~~ 3 • ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE December 8, 2004 ~ ~ ~ TO Chairman and Members ~of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16455 -HAIFA - A request to subdivide 1 9 acre of land Into three parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and W ilson Avenue - APN 1074-261-02 This protect is categorically exemptfrom the requirements of the • Callfomla Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Detlsity 0 63 units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zomng North - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Hermosa Elementary School, Low Resldentlal (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Resldentlal (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Public Facilities (Elementary School) East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential D Site Characteristics The protect site has a street frontage of 295 feet along Hermosa Avenue and 305 feet along Wilson Avenue The lot contains an existing residential structure, which will be located on Parcel 1 of the proposed subdivision The site is generally level with a slight slope to the south with low grass and shrubs dominating the vegetation None of the existing trees surrounding the existing residence will be removed ITEM "D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16455 -HAIFA December 8, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into three parcels with the lots oriented in a north-south direction All of the proposed parcels wdl have a lot depth of approximately 277 feet, the lot frontage will measure approximately 103 feet for Parcel 1, 90 feet for Parcel 2, and 80 feet for Parcel 3 Parcel 1 contains an existing re,~idence, however, no development proposals have been submitted for either Parcel 2 or Parcel 3 Any future development will be regwred to comply with all City standards including, but not limited to, site development, design, grading, and construction requrements B Committee Review On October 19, 2004, the Design Review, Grading, and Technical Review Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions C Environmental Assessment This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) The protect is within an urbanized area zoned for residential use and involves the division of property into fewer than five parcels m conformance with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance No variances are regwred All utility services and street access to the parcels meeting local standards are available The properly has not been part of a subdivision within the last two years, and the parcels do not have an average slope of greater than 20 percent CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB TG\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Vianity Map Exhibit "B" -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16455 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16455 r1 LJ ~-a 1 ~ -i¢= U '._ • t 9ua1TM I~r145 ,. ~,~ . s,yr• , ~_ 3~ ' - .~ . t.-.~_ ~ y. ,. ' iw~, r~i„ t ~~' C' ` ~~ "~ t i ~ , . ~ r ' _ ~ ~ a '~ .fx~ +`~` ' ~~~~`'~~ ~j _ ~ f ~ ~ . ~ _ _ :5 , r r~~+2 r~ij, i ~ty~~ Y a ~'z t'3', 1 ~ 'M2 ~ "y ~ i Y s, ~, '>17 .~ 3 ^ " , y± PI ?g y~ y~~ s i2"1rr~~~.y, ©e,~}• >-~s" x..cn t"'F` 4 AtRI & f u"~ r ~ o 3 , y ' - l ~ ~ ' vs"x~ v1 Y: C, 4 db, ~F ~ 1 ~ 2L' -^n1r ~ k ~ `t ~ ` s , ~ t.r~ ~nsY 'V ~ti o2q~;n", .~ N s y ' L : t n ~ `~ ' . ; y .,y 2 i E' ~, ~~(ts r, '.s,~ic ~ ~"~ q~ ~ •w ~,•t ~ ~a ,# r, ' ' ' _ ~~. x Z~ • t ~r ~.:' r~ .b~~ 5~„ ? ~ , ~zr. t ~ , ~._ ~"~ . 4i r ~' ~t _ .ar ~I ~N =l~'~F't i ~ss%\rt} ~rr'.~VV«n '"k ~~•~ ~i~ ,r„ .•Fr _~.~ ' ' ir u, ~.' °.,'ve'~ 5 ., n~` ~ r .! ~ ,, ~~'' -----------_---_I_ -~-V' • •~T~ ~~~ --- c u I~oq~b5 ~~ ~ "~~ ---~'i ~ C _~ ~ i '~~\ i ° ~ ~g 8y fe!! 1 L. -I ~~ ~3 ~ 8 11 1 ~ ~t 1 ~ S~ fl~~ Ai~~ ~.. -- a ~~~ ~~ °' ~~ ~~ cS d' :: ~Q ii ~ F~ ~j i 0 c ~, c7 N 1 4? ~ ~i 4. ~~ ~~ 2U' ~~ ~~ K ~~ v J ~E ~i ~= ~ '~ `~C ~~ if g c ~ i~ ~I ~~ z ~._ i ~~ '' I_~ `:. €% ~Z « a 's F-, ~. ~ :_ ~ ail F-~ ,. ! ! t~ ~i`~Ili~'~ 1 ~ l19~oat~~la ^ ~RlOI~Ic ~~P +IjY ~f~wlt~~55 ~,Y4tts~iiT ~,~j,~ ~~ ~ ~,~ { ^ ~1 D-4 ~• ~_~ `I n m yt 9 ~~~~ ~~,i 4p59F a¢f-.. i~t~ ~{ RESOLUTION NO 04-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16455, A SUBDIVISION OF 3 LOTS ON 1 9 ACRE OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER --- - ACRE),LOCATEDATTHENORTHEASTCORNEROFHERMOSAAVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF- APN: 1074-261-02 ~, A Rentals 1 lyad Haifa filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16455, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and Wilson Avenue, with a street frontage of 295 feet along Hermosa Avenue and a lot frontage of 305 feet along Wilson Avenue, and is presently improved with one single-family home, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family homes and is zoned Very Low Residential, the property to the south is developed v~nth the Hermosa Elementary School and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the east is developed with asingle-family home and is zoned Very Low Residential, and the property to the west is vacant and zoned Very Low Residential, and c The application proposes the subdivision of land for residential purposes, and d The subdivision, togetherwith the recommended conditions of approval, complies • with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows D-5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-124 SUBTPM16445 -HAIFA December 8, 2004 Page 2 a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely tp cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable infury to humans and wildlife ~or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict wdh any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or for the use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15315 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) The application is a subdivision of property into three parcels in an urbanized area zoned for industnal use, no vanances or exceptions are required, all utility services and street access to the protect site are available and meet local standards, the property was not subdivided in the past two years, and the property does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, ariached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Provide vehicle gates, with side step-through for horse access at all Local Feeder Trail entrances per City standard 2) Provide a 10-foot comer cut-off at a 45-degree angle where Local Feeder Trail easements intersect or change direction 3) The rail fence shall be installed along inside edge (south edge) of the 15-foot Local Feeder Trail easement line No fences or wall shall encroach into this trail easement 4) No block walls shall be installed within the front yard area except in conformance with the City standards The proper line-of-sight shall be provided for dnvers egressing onto Wilson Avenue to the satisfaction of the Cdy Engineer Engineering Department 1) Dedicate an additional 8 feet on Wilson Avenue (52 feet the from centerline) for Community Trail purposes ~_~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04124 SUBTPM16445 -HAIFA , December 8, 2004 Page 3 2) Wilson Avenue frontage improvements are to be m accordance with "Secondary Artenal" standards, including but not limited to, the following a) Provde curb and gutter, community trail, street trees, and asphalt pavement, as required b) Provide two 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights r ~ c) Protect existmg~ R26 "No, Parking" signs, traffic striping, and signage, or replace as requred d) Each parcel shall be required to have a circular or hammerhead dnveway e) Provide a Class II Bicycle Lane along Wilson Avenue frontage 3) Community trail shall be constructed along the entire protect frontage Use Standard Drawing 1003 if the proposed lots front-on Wilson Avenue, 1002-A for side-on lots Trail fencing shall not encroach on the dnveway Imes-of-sight a) The City will maintain the trail only All landscaping shall be pnvately maintained and imgated b) Driveways crossing the community trail shall be a medwm-broom finish 4) Hermosa Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance wdh the "Collector Residential" standards, including but not limited to, the following a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and asphalt pavement, as required b) Provide two 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights c) Protect existing R26 "No Parking" signs, traffic stnpmg, and signage, or replace as required d) If Parcel 1 takes access from Hermosa Avenue, the dnveway shall be designed as a circular or hammerhead dnveway e) Provide traffic stnpmg and signage, as required 5) Construct an access ramp at the comer of Wilson and Hermosa Avenues per City Standard No 102 6) Provide dnve approach on Hermosa Avenue for access to a pnvate local feeder trail D -'1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-124 SUBTPM16445 -HAIFA December 8, 2004 Page 4 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the protect side of Wilson Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending to the first pole on the west side of Hermosa Avenue to the first pole east of the east protect boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Wilson Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreementto recovero~half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the Gty, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 8) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entenng the property from adtacent areas 9) A signed consent waiver form to tom and/or form the appropnate landscape and lighting distncts shall be filed with the City Engineer pnor io the final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first 10) Street Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Pnor to any work being performed inpublic nghts-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers office. Secunty shall be posted and an improvement agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Ariomey guaranteeing ,~ completion of the public improvements, pnor to final map approval 11) Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covenng the estimated cost of operating all new regwred streetlights for theirfirst suc months of operation, pnor to final map approval 12) Install missing street trees along the protect frontages per the "Street Tree Regwrements" table previously given Revise existing improvement plans as needed 13) Process a grading plan for the purpose of installing local trail, including cross-lot drainage facilities, and Best Management Practices pnor to final map approval The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o-g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-124 SUBTPM16445 -HAIFA December 8, 2004 Page 5 BY -- - Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ! I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wrt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~J L ~'Q ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN* STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16455 // ' 'r, SUBJECT: THREE LOT SUBDIVISION , APPLICANT: IYAD HAIFA LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Coin lehon A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to reiingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapabon shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom tot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first SC-11 A4 ~ _ ~^l Prgect No SUBTPM16455 Comole4on Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all • other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 4 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, Penang, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and pnor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including Penang and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material µ b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, mcluding,,a 17-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Bwlding Offiaal d Prowde a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landsa3ping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by flits section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy For single-family residential development, all slope planting and urigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition / / I / / I / / / I / I -~-~- / I / / / I SC•1-04 p?( I Proied No SUBTPM~6455 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Pian, , F INS e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and , g Planning Department Prc/ect Number (SUBTPM16455) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the pro/ect file number (SUBTPM16455) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro/ect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits / / _/_/_ / / / / / / / / / / C_~ SC-1-04 p 3~a Protect No SUBTPM16455 Comolehon Dale 4 For pro/ects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all _/_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of . Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Offical prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and pnor to issuance of bwiding permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department _/_/_ for approval G. Grading .. 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_I_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final gradirfg plan shall be in substantial ~ ' conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_I_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /_I_ submitted, and approved by the Bwiding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds 5 As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met _/_/- . a Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site _/_/_ drainage faalities necessary for dewatenng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to renal map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits b Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage waterthat are conducted onto or over _//_ ad/scent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and building permits c On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatenng and protecting the subdivided _/_/_ properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be sub/ect to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested d Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division _/_/ for approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits (this may be on an incremental or composite basis) e All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or _/_/_ planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Offiaal In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided This requirement does not release the applicanUdeveloper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17 08 040 of the Development Code 6 In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the _/_/_ standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17 24 070 SC-1-04 p4-13 Protect No SUBTPM16455 Completion Date A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or ten"~~ative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, Idcal feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans andlor tentative fnap 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 52 total feet on Wilson Avenue 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Camm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Wilson Avenue X X X X X X CI II Hermosa Avenue X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) ADA ramp at Wilson Avenue _/_/~ / / / / / / / / / / / I_ - -. / / / / / / ~~ SC-1-04 5 ~` ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16455 Comole6on Date 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first - b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal osndwt, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~~ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables Far additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mtn Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Hermosa Avenue Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' o c 24" Fill Indica "Catawba" Hybrid-Dark Purple std box in Background Platanus acerifolia London Plane 8' 30" o c 15 Fill gal in Wilson Avenue Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' o c 24" Fill Indica "Muskogee" Hybrid-Lavender box in 6 p-Is SC-1-04 -~-~- / I / / I / ~-~~ / / / / / / -~-~- / / Project No SUBTPM'16455 Comolehon Date J. K. L. M. Street Trees f N t or o es Construction 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Cary standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Cdy inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutrient defiaencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sublect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intg'rsections and commercial or • industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or•form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_I_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_I_ property from ad/scent areas Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for all public improvements Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _I_I_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be sublect to any requirements that may be received from them SC-1-04 7 ©-~~ Protect No SUBTPM16455 Completion Date N. General Requirements and Approvals Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffiaent improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days fotlowmg the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect r APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 8 p-~~ -~-~- / / ~1, l..J RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS August 18, 2004 lyad Hayfa 10114 Wilson Avenue SUBTPM16455 .. r THE FOLLOWING STANDARIa CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are• 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways 2. ` At intersections 3. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this protect will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances A fire flow letter must be obtained from CVWD to prove the available water supply 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved p-Lg 4 On all site plans to be submitted for revew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review ail requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee w.. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delroering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 2 l~- I~ i • ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE December 8, 2004 ~/ TO' Chairman and Members~of the Planning Commission FROG Brad Buller, Clty Planner gy Emily Wimer, Associate Planner SUEUECT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - SUBTPM16657 - request to subdivide 7 10 net acres of land Into condominium purposes) for industrial tenant space (Subarea 8), located on the east side of Rochester APN 0229-021-34 Related Flle Development protect is categorically exempt from the re Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Subarea 8 South - Vacant and self-storage facility, General Industrial, Subarea 8 East - Recreational Vehicle Storage, Utility Corridor West - Industrial past Rochester Avenue; General Industrial, Subarea 8 FUSCOE ENGINEERING - A a single parcel subdivision (for in the General Industrial District Avenue, north of Arrow Route - Review DRC2003-00732 This gwrements of the California rtate CEQA Guidelines SecLon Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Sports complex parking lot beyond approved industrial buildings, General Industrial, General Plan Designations Protect Slte - General Industrial North - Generallndustrial South - General Industrial East - Utility Corridor West - Generallndustrial Site Characteristics The site is currently being graded for construction of the nine Industrial buildings that were approved by the Planning Commission December 10, 2003 The surrounding land uses include a vacant property to the south, a parking lot utilized by the Quakes Stadium to the north, recreational vehicle storage to the east, and existing industrial to the west ITEM "G" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16657 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING . December 8, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS - A General The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property for condominiums on the southern portion of the master planned Stadium Business Park The applicant intends to sell tenant spaces to indmdual owners of 5 large bwldings on the south side of Jack Benny Dnve According to the applicant, the common area landscaping, paving, and bwlding exteriors wdl be maintained by an association of owners Reciprocal parking access wdMalso be provided B Environmental Assessment On December 10, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the industrial development portion of the project and found that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment The proposed subdroision is to facilitate the approved ndustnal development. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption - Minor Land Divisions). , CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel a Map SUBTPM16657 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad er City Planner BB EWVs Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Master Site Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for SUBTPM16657 LJ ~- a I I i i a ~~ ~ OBI -~z- ~ o ~Z ~ / N4i N 1 1 ~~ 1 ~ ~ 1 _ _ ~ y~/qp I®C Aq ~ -------i---~---,-------~ j ~----- ~ I ; ~~ I i i i ~~~ ~ I ~-------E- I ----I I ~ i ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~ i I i~~ ~I ~ i ~ ~d~ ---, ~ ~ i i --- ----- I ~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I i ~ ~i i a -_ _ ----~ .~}~.~ - ~------- -- 1----- -~----'---1---- ~y - iuuaaor ------- --- L \ e I 6B ~ 1 ~~ ~, ~ ~ _~j, E~~b~'A" C7 -3 a a ~ w ~o ~ o ~< ~ ~ ~~~ a~ o° .o ~~ w o ~~~ ~z ~o~ 0 N v~ ~ o z ~ w ~ H a ~({~11 PT h~p 11 ~~ s qi it S~ Iii ~ i Ala ~ 116w 1 ~ 1~ 1 q l li 1 u 1 Ij I ~ltai;liA~ti~ 1: 61~olat ., . 1 1 ~~ ., lili i!i Inii lsi t ,~ ~,. ~~ 1 ~~i $~ ~p~ ii ~ . -! ~ _ __ _. .___ ______ __ _ _-_ _ _ _i'._ _ lhYLM"RJ 'l9NW19XU fAU~E ~>~ull ~I~IlhI ~. I .. , .. ::::::::.. ......::: ' ~~ed ssauzsng m~iPeaS ~~ ~E I Q .a 4,.v..pY ~~Q •t~W :t/~i V ~ ~ [LNfDR JBU mR6T] 6A o~ ~ i 1. ~~- 9 __ - ~-~'~ 1_ i • ~ ~ I I w y __~_-_ SY{, ___-_91M0 AV 9 ~(t ~ ::t ~i I --- ~ 3 3t ! n ,~ -_~_ _ ii ~ ~ ~tl! •55 ~S5i I ~ i ~ :2t~! 1 ~:! ~5qq5 15; 5 i5 ~ 4 iiif 55 I ~ ~ i !55 5 5 5555 ~I S 5~5 1 ~ ;5 5 5 ~ , i. SS ' S 55f ' i ii~~ !i ~ ; i ~ i ; 3 at,! L 3ii313 ! #i#€il „I ~l I , ~~ 0 ~d ~ ! at~! ; 3 3~!## 9 !Si!## 9 ! i131' ; , F ~Sst ~' ~ ~F ~31! ~ii 1 #~~ ~ ~ ~ ~1" ? ! ~ ~i3i ~li~~ i~ ~~~ 1111 ## i i ~ , { ' 1 ! , u !1 1s r~ mm, BIZ i' I~ i^~ ~~ , I -r I b i I i e ' ~ i, I i t~ , i ~ - ; i ' ~ ' .a I ' , ~i~ ' t+- - i L- -- ---_ L-,_ _ . _. ____- _ ---.____ ____ _ ~_ _ ~,~h~blt 1.G~, U-5 RESOLUTION NO 04-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16657, A SUBDIVISION OF 1 LOT FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON 710 NET ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-021-034 A Rentals 1 Fuscoe Engmeenng filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No 16657, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, vnth a street frontage of approximately 737 feet and a lot depth of approximately 921 feet and is presently being graded, and b The property to the north of the subject site ~s the sports complex parking lot, the property to the south consists of vacant property and self storage, the property to the east is recreational vehicle storage, and the property to the west is mdustnal beyond Rochester Avenue, and c The parcel map proposes the development of 5 mdustnal buildings with one condominium map, and d The property, including the parking, paving, landscaping, and extenor elevations, shall be maintained by an association of owners, and e The developer intends to have separate owners within the budding space ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-125 SUBTPM16657 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING December 8, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 _ above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific ~lans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the parcel map ,is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The parcel map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the parcel map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 This protect is cetegoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion setforth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Department 1) The conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2003-00732, as contained m Planning Commission Resolution No 03-189, shall apply to this protect 2) Reciprocal access agreement shall be provided for all owners located on said Parcel Map 16657. 3) Any addition of gates or gated access shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department pnor to construction 4) The Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) and ArtiGes of Incorporation of the Owners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engmeenng Departments and the CityAttomey They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Owners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the names and addresses of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information chang~e7s ~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-125 SUBTPM16657 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING December 8, 2004 Page 3 Engineenng Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Plamm~g Commission Resolution No 03-189 approving Development Review DRC2003-00732 shall appy 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this„~esolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~b COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN= DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16657 ~I SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP/STADIUM BUSINESS PARK APPLICANT: FUSCOE ENGINEERING LOCATION: SEC JACK BENNY DRIVE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Com letion A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_ complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) C. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, SC-11-04 ~ ~j i \planning\final\pingcommisubtpmt6657cond12-8 doc l Project No SUBTPM16657 Comole6on Date c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , SUBTPM16657 clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permd issuance ~~ ,,,, 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or.Walls 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bulding and Safety Division , D. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM16657) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Dmsion for availability of • the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits. 4. Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area a Provide a reduced site plan (8 %z" x 11 "), which indicates the non-bwldable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of aNon-Buildable Easement " which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) E. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance wrath Calfomia Building Code, City Grading . Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan SC-1-04 / / / / / / I / -/-/- / I / / / / / / / / i~planning~inallpingcomm~subtpm16657cond12.8 doc v rfo PrgeG No SUBTPM16657 Comolehon Date 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfomla to /_/~ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ bme of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and fbr /_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Calrfomla registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning commission Resolution No 03-189 approving _/ /_ DRC2003-00732 shall apply , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED . • Sc-1-o4 i lplanning\final\pingcommisubtpm16657cond12-8 doc v ~ ` • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS October 13, 2004 Stadium Plaza South Tentative Parcel Map Condominium Purposes SUBTPM16657 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS P~ OJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Also see the approved alternative method for this project. a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercal/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwidmg, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Flre Fiow 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Firewater plans are regwred for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other . applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in commeraal or mdustnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet ~~ la• FSC-5 Fire Alarm System Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is requred to monitored by a listed centra~ station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 1S` story exterior wall shall be located within 150- feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions +«~ 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside tum radws shall be 46-feet d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-Peet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehice weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Departmer~ apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings. 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates. Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width. c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d. Gates are not regwred to be motorized Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be include in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval ~-(3 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Altematrve Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or - - operation not spec~cally described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to Ide or property • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies ~.,, Compressed Gases r • Public Assembly ,,, • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems • Repair Garages ' • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certrfied Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 Califomia Building, Fire, Mecharncal, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards ~~~`T FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdi review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access. a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property line, or M. c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an own'er's assoaation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distract The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwiding or other structure shall be placed wthin the dedicated access wdhout Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site, plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement. c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radu and slope o~ roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements o the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #g-7 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required prvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property line, or c. Provide service to adiacent properties, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation, or e. Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plan specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any bulding G-ls perrnit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Diwsion and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the _ __ locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-6. All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services sF~all inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD: Fire ~onstrucUon Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: i. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) -~ 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is~ placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #g-2 by Fire Construction Services 8. Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and` acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the requued annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 9 Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercialhndustnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated dunng periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commerGal and industnal bwidings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front an~ back of all suites 10. Hazardous Materials. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect buldng or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino 13. Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/i" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector ~-i n R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE December 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Dan Coleman, Pnnapal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC - A request to subdivide 8 85 gross acres of land into 30 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelimg units per acre), located on the north side of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue -APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, and 34 . VARIANCE DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT - A request for an increase m wall height above 8 feet to reduce freeway traffic noise for 30 single-faintly lots proposed in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue -APN 0225 161-19, 32, 33, and 34 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 4 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Single-family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - 210 Freeway East - Single-family residences, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Prolect Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) South - 210 Freeway East - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The vacant property contains alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation This site is surrounded to the north and east by single-family homes, to the west by vacant land, and to the south by the 210 Freeway off ramp ITEMS "H" & "I" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 & DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The applicant is requesting approval for 30 lots that would ultimately be developed with single-family homes, however, no housing product is proposed at this time The lot sizes are consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods Currently, the only available access to the site is from Stable Falls Avenue along the east tract boundary Eventually a secondary access will be provided from the west when the adtoining property develops Until then, the Fire District has accepted fire sprinklers in the homes that will be developed within this tract (Lots 1-25) B Design Review Committee The Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, Fong) reviewed the protect on August 3, 2004 The Committee recommended approval subtect to several modifications These modifications are reflected in the attached revised plans Subsequently, the developer reverted back to the original concept of five lots along Stable Falls Avenue The Committee indicated that would be acceptable provided there was neighborhood support C Technical and Grading Review Committees The Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval D Newhborhood Meeting The applicant conducted a meeting on August 28, 2004, with surrounding residents to explain the protect and obtain their input Fourteen residents attended the meeting and asked general questions about the timing of construction, housing product, construction access, and the future disposition of the vacant property to the west The applicant is not proposing any homes at this time E Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant level A noise study was also prepared to evaluate the impact of the freeway traffic noise on the proposed residential lots The study concluded that sound attenuation walls, similar to those on surrounding tracts, would reduce noise to acceptable levels If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS The applicant is requesting a variance to allow wall heights greater than 8 feet The site adtoins the 210 Freeway, hence, is subtect to traffic noise levels that exceed the City's standards The acoustical analysis indicates sound attenuation walls up to 16 feet high (including retaining walls), plus acoustic upgrades in homes will reduce noise levels to acceptable levels The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards, however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve the request The following are facts to support these findings ~ ~s ~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 & DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC . December 8, 2004 Page 3 1 Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code FacUs The applicant has requested flexibility with the regwred wall height in order to construct sound attenuation walls to reduce traffic noise in compliance with the City's standards Variances for similar wall heights were granted previously for surrounding tracts ~ 2 Findin That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district FacUs The protect site is unusual because it is located adtacent to a freeway 3 Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district FacUs Without the Variance, the protect would be deprived of pnwleges entoyed • by other owners within the same district to develop single-family residences and to construct sound attenuation walls necessary to protect said homes from excessive traffic noise levels The proposed wall heights are consistent with those on surrounding properties for which the Planning Commission has granted variances or that were constructed as part of the freeway 4 Findin That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the wcinity Facts Because the location of the site adtacent to a freeway is unique, the proposed protect will be in the spirit of other variances that have been approved in the general area Findin That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the warnty Facts Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity On the contrary, granting of the variance will reduce noise levels to levels consistent with City standards, hence, prevent exposure of residents to excessive noise levels . Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are suffiaent facts to support the findings ~-~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 & DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 4 i CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval, and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, through adoption of the attached Resolutions Respectfully submitted, Brad B~ City Planner BB DC\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Wall Variance Plot Plan Exhibit "F" - Vanance Justification by Applicant • Exhibit "G" - Design Rewew Action dated August 3, 2004 Exhibit "H" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT16812 Draft Resolut ion of Approval for Vanance DRC2004-00566 • ~~ ~< ~~ iqq' ~Il ..Y e~ ~~ ~~~~: ~ _~~; \~ _~- =_, ,i '~:'-~ ~~ ~~1 i ,,~. ~~ -~~ - - N ~ ~ a~aaa m ~ ,,.. ~ V ~~ ^~ Q ~~~e~~ a f ? r ~ ~ O !! ! ~ z w Z J= Q ~~~sa~~ f Nm~S z ~ ia: ~ ¢F~ ~ ~ o`V, 1 !ii Q W ~ w ¢ m ~ N !ilia m w ~ KUa^ Q ~ mw=m ~ ~ O M ' rC_o¢ y ~JJ'^•^ ^~° m a LL w ~~ 2 y, W ~ ~ ~ Q ~~ r i r .~ f ~~ i ~4 ~' ~~ ', ~f ; d~ f," E ~, ~~~ ,;i I ~`~ rf_. r~ ,"' ,4 ~~i A a . ~-. '.-'---- -- --- - _~ -_ -- L - TR w I ooxM .o.Y w.ie (EXlSI W FAMBI.Y t ! ~ sn . , _ ~ ~n' o '~ a o ----- -- \ ----- -- - ~ a~ ~~ ~ - " I ~+~~ ~ m' • L I 1' M ~ - ~ I ~ ~ ~ a ~- ~ .. v + I a ~ -~ s .DEVELOPMENT, INC. al ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~ ~ DFIVE _____ 17760 FITCH STREET, SURE 120 ! , `_ ' _ ` _____ .____. ______ . ___ IRVINE CA 82814 1 a ' ~ ~ PHONE (949)863-1065 a _ ~ ~ FAX (949)863-0065 7 I y14~~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~, a ° ~ ~ ~ a a 1 - u,:.b..~ ~.» A 8 J RESOURCES, INC - "'~! "~{~ p~''' ~ - aTRACT 13612 17~A1®9M _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ FAMILY RFSDENFIAU •. _ .....•. ...~. . „ - ~' ~ ' _ - ~ ~ ~ _ TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 sraTE Roure ® ~ RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-30 SfT'E UTILIZATION MAP OlRI~001d1101 ptR dmM9~fOd MRIl1d•JLl\d W!1!d•A~!) d oRle,l/Mm/R4d tlIY OF flMIpM) CICA110116q COIIIItCR BAN ~MD, HG1E aF CiLLF01aaA 91$T 3 CIF 8 z ~ 13 F _~ VL °°~.~.~~° "~,.~o~o.~.. VL ' ;.,,..b,..~,..,. ~~ ii ~ X67@ it ~,w.r,~.r w .1 I ~ ~IIIIIIII u .~ f ~S 1~ IH8 ~ 14 ~EIIIES'~ IIlllllliil: I I a a ~ ,> -- ~ 1 I __________.__L__._________- _J 1~ ~' i i ~!!!~ I, ,E I ~d 1 f j qE:i j l~li~ ~ a i~ I:°i~ ~~~ ~ S `IC~ ~ ~ li ~+~1 i$E j ~~~ ~E!~~ MI'E/~ ~: ~~B 9 11 S d `js; ~ Y ~ ~~ ~iLiili~ m •pr.r Z J ~~aa~ 55i~J!ln~a Q V 1101tl,1,~1 ~ ~ a 1l91g! 111111~11~1 1 L 1 ~ Q 1 1 ~ lI.S! IIS= ,IieE '. ~ $E7~.1 ~ <E~ I dai 3 1':11 _ !4 IliilE ,_„ ~ 7 jv"`d N WQ~ U ~ N W a S = W xx u~2LL n n U Z W Cr N lr '!Q ~` ~~ r -- - ' " - -- --- --- - --- /.--- /%l TR ~~ ~ M8 (EX1S w w y FANfl.Y ~ - w. ~l ' .nom n n I 9• 6~ r~ one t ~~ e ~ __ - i ~, .~~ ~'°° AM• t IN nA ~ 1.A . E ml ~m y ~ V' nom ~ ~, I . - ". ww ~i~ ~ >t~~ m ® '- p~ ~ ~ ~ ~P BTAIE ROUTE e I ° ~ I >• t2• ig .~ - 1 -~~---- I -- ~ r ~'N~~ A ~ e 9 A_ ' d m a ~ ', ,T• _. _ ~~ e• ® -7. 5~ N 0• .Y M r , ,tin 1 M ~~~ ~a nem~°~r-swan ~4.d0 I.~t4 ~- ~ s TRAC713B$ ~_ _ ~_ rt& 299/86-03 ~ -s- e KE:TYJG SCi9LE - _ _ ILY RESbENMU ~~~ N _ oo~es~oe . ~r.s R3:TJ"'~ pfj~ ~ ~~ - ° ~ • ~ i mw°°as _ _ ~~~ ... e ~_.. y ' y . ~I ~~~ 'I ~ TYPICAL FVfURE LOT ~;~ r~ DRAMAGE DETAR. °°~wR1Ot ~ 1 •p 4W~W ~, ~_` /~ ROOEO ~`. ®;~ ~_>'- ~ DEVELOPMENT, INC S~,S&'l6R.. nneo~~o 17780 FITCH STREET SUITE 120 °°'°°~° IRVINE CA 92610 PHONE (949) 863-1055 '~~~TRALT 13812 FAX (949) 883-0065 ~ 299~e-oa iun ~~ppbb(~~~ 5~1~ ' A 8 J RESOURCES INC ~FAnm.r RESbENFW_) , I ® .m ~. # 'r~iR~ (aLerT teetzl ~ ~ TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 RES~BJIIAL L0T31-30 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Wm ~~q0~1 t b ~.. y~d _~ ~..~ _ f °Rlnlllm Ml~l on GIT GF R4JICID CUCddldgd, COUIIY GF BNI ®WIIpD, STATE OF CAlFdf1M at+gr a of a C_~ -., ~~ ~~~aaaa ~ f I i ' ~ U~ ~~ 'Ld v~..~S, LL~_ i ~ ~~ ~..i il` X14 ~iw sJ _n S"_s~___ __ _ ~~.1~' 1 ~I _ W `wt; -; L~L Q 1 ~9 .'~.,, r l1 . ~+ = i ~ mss" . ~ ... ....____ ._____-f._____ _ ________________..___.'---~ r__ _ __ _ . _ _ r.______ v ~,~_~i._.._______ r _ " _ , III I _ _~. L"ii ~„ i! o A • ! i ^ t I III ~ I '~ I _~t _~~~ _ ii1 _°";ru;:= I. t-a--r~-: r;ti, 1. ~r i r ! ~ ~ ~ 'tix,~i'~It'_ ii ' 1, .• _ ' ' :~ ~ _ - 1 I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , , .~ v. ~ "I LI~i ~.1_ ~~~; r r ='a' a ~ " mot,; -. ;- ~I' _ ~1 i~11` ~ -~ - ~ ~ ~ ~d 1 ' - ~- l.~ r I n ~ ~~ I I ' 1- _ I i ) ~ _ I % - - _ ~ - ~~~ I,_ -~ - ~._ . - ..,,,, ~~" ~ - fl , '10,~ ter' _ _ ' ~ ~ ~~ \"^~ `'9`~F;B„ate' ~ _ ( ~ --~. - "~\ ~ ; ~ PROPOSED COMBINATION RETAMING WALL --- -°-_ AND SOUND WALL TO EXCEED 8 FEET - - W HEK;IiT ~X~l.~i-1~ Q~~ kef" /1/0~ ~ ~i t ~ /~ ~~` .. y ski v.:ion ~?' ~x~-dr~, 5~ 9'° ~„,~ ~, NOTE _ APPROXIMATE SOUND WALL HEIGFii ~ .... - ALONG SOUTI-~iN TRACT BOUNDARY v LOTS 1-11, 616 FEET PR~AR~ FOfi (SUB TT 16812) = TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 DEVELOPMENT, INC. RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-30 5°"" '~=,5°. RETAINING WAL 17760 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 / IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949)863-1055 ~ ~~` VARIANCE EXHIBIT FAX (949) 863-0066 AND D DATE PREPARES JUPE 07, 2004 A & J RESOURCES, INC CR1, OF RANCHO CUCAAIOIKiA, COIRlIY OF &W BE<~WiDNp SfAIE OF CALFOfWA ~~monmommw~-me~.v WM Variance Request The applicant is requesting approval of a variance that would allow the combination perimeter wall and retaining wall to exceed the eight-foot limit. The variance requests that the proposed wall heights along the project's southerly property line are allowed to exceed the maximum eight feet. The proposed lots that have walls on their rear property lines exceeding the eight-foot height limit are lots 1-11. The proposed wall heights along the southerly property Ime are required to mitigate the existing freeway traffic noise. The wall heights proposed under this variance have been identified m the submitted Noise Impact Study under File No. SUBTT76812. This variance request is compatible with a similar situation that existed on the adjacent tract In Tract 13812, the homes that back onto the freeway have constructed asixteen-foot block wall to mitigate the existing freeway traffic noise .~ ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p m Brent Le Count August 3, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC -A requestto subdivide 8.85 gross acres of land into 30single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of the 210 Freeway west bound off-ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue - APN. 0225-161-19, 32, 33, and 34 Design Parameters The site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, and is surrounded by single-fam0y homes. To the north is zoned Low Residential and the smallest adtoining lot area is 7,500 square feet To the east is zoned Very Low Residential and the smallest adtoinmg lot area is 20,000 square feet. While the site has a relatively gentle slope, it has been the recipient over the years of large boulders making for a very rough terrain. Removal of the boulders itself will do much to making the site more livable The developer has master planned the land to the west so that there will eventually be a thru connection for secondary access In the meantime, the site will act as an 1,100-foot long cul-de-sac where Fire Protection Distract regulation limits cul-de-sac lengths to 600 feet The developer's solution, which the Fire Protection District has accepted, is to install fue sprinklers in those homes that extend beyond 600 feet of cul-de-sac length. The site is regulated by the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) and is within the Day Creek neighborhood theme area of said Plan, however, no house product is proposed at this time The protect design meets all regwred Basic Development Standards as shown below Required by ENSP Proposed by Applicant Minimum Net Average Lot Area 10,000 square feet 10,040 square feet Minimum Net Lot Area 7,200 square feet 7,215 square feet Lot W idth C~ Front Setback 65 average +/- 5 feet 60 feet mirnmum Corner Lot Width 70 feet 80 feet Lot Depth 100 feet 120 feet Mirnmum Frontage ~ Front P.L 40 feet 60 feet Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Lot Pattern -The proposed tract is at the boundary between the Low Residential Distract (proposed tract) and the Very Low Residential District (existing tract to the east) Should Lots 26 through 30 be reduced to three lots of similar width as the three'/z-acre lot across Stable Falls Avenue for compatibility? The applicant has indicated that their neighborhood meeting will not occur until after the Committee meeting Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the ', Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues r~ U CJ DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT,INC August 3, 2004 Page 2 1 Provide a decorative sound wall as necessary to effectively mitigate noise from the 210 Freeway The design of the freeway sound wall and retaining wall shall match that of the existing sound wall to the east The proposed design is a combination of a retaining wall up to 10.3 feet and a 16-foot high sound wall (see Grading Plan Section D-D) similar to the existing freeway sound attenuation walls Therefore, the applicant has filed a Vanance application (see attached Retaining Wall Vanance Exhibit). w~ 2 There is an existing 10-foot wide water easement, and a portion of an existing storm drain easement along the east tract boundary at Lot 1 (see Grading Plan Section C-C) Landscaprng should be provided using awater-conserving ground cover Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1. Lot 2 is proposed to dram across Lot 1 Planning Commission Resolution 92-17 states that drainage from single-faintly lots shall flow directly to the streets If cross-lot drainage is determined to be necessary, "drainage from only one lot shall flow through only one other lot.° Cross-lot drainage shall be contained m aconcrete/rock Imed swale or reinforced concrete pipe (12-inch mirnmum diameter) . Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of Tentative tract 16812 with appropnate dvection regarding Maior Issue Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Fong, McPhail Staff Planner Brent Le Count The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the protect subiect to the following conditions 1 Provide transition of density by eliminating one lot along Stable Falls Avenue 2 Provide soundwall per staff comments 3 Address all technical and grading issues to the satisfaction of staff 4 Modify Street C and the master plan to the west per staff's design 5 Rewse development plans to address the above items prior to Planning Commission review L._J ~~~ • ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using !nk Use the tab key to move from one Irne to the next Ime ) Planning Denman (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. / Application Number for the pro/ect to which this /onn pertains SUBTT16812 Protect Tdle Tentative Tract No 16812 ~o~ G~~~jS Name & Address of protect owner(s) .1ti~' ..yt A&J Resources, Inc 0~ ~~ 1100 Avondale Road \1~ Sin Marino, Callfomla 91108 Name & Address of developer or protect sponsor 16CA Development 17780 Fitch Street, Swte 120 Irvine, Callfomla 92614 Contact Person 8 Address Ben Anderson 17780 Fitch Street, Suite 120 Irvine, Cahfomia 92614 Name & Address of person preparing this form (~f dd/erent /rom above) Sheryl Horn, LSA Associates, Inc 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 500 Riverside, Callfomla 92507 Telephone Number 951 781-9310 Ini I turfy Part 1 doc Page o ~~ Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at fhe time of submittal, City staff wdl not be available to peAorm work required to provide missing information PROJECT INFORMATION 6 DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an astensk (') is not regwred o(non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff •1) Prowde a full wale (8-112 z 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ect sde, and indicate the site boundanes $~ Attached. 2) Prowde a sat of color photographs that show representabve wews into the site from the north, south, east and west, wews into and from the site from the pnmary access points that serve the site, and representabve wews of signitlcant features /rom the site Include a map showing location of each photograph See Attached. 3) Pro/ect Location (descnbe) The proposed protect is located to the north of Interstate X10 east of Day Creek Boulevard, south of Secretariat Drive, and west of Stable Falls Avenue 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 225-161-19,225-161-32,225-161-33,225-161-34 •5) Gross Sde Area (ac/sq tt) g g5 acres (385 506 sq ft) •6) Net Sde Area (total srfe size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 6 92 acres (301,435 sq ft) 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the prolect site (attach add~t~onal sheet d necessary) The prolect does not Include any proposed general plan amendment or zone changes 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permits which will be necessary from the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ect NPDES -Regional Water Quality Control Board 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the sde as it exists before the prolect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, dreinage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features descnbed In addition, ute all sources of in/ormation (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, trefrc studies) The 8 85-acre protect site is within a suburban area It is surrounded on three sides by land zoned for residential development and on the fourth by Interstate 210 No existing structures are present on the protect site Soils on-site consist of Tutunga Loamy Sand and Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit V-3) These sods are typically excessively drained, moderately Initial Study Parl 1 doc Pagp $ o}~ ` /~ Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM sloping Boll forming on alluvial fans These soils are not considered expansive The protect site Is not located within a geothechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type (General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2) The protect site Is not within designated or proposed critical habitat for threatened or endangered species The protect site supports alluvial fan sage scrub, however the habitat value of this site Is substantially reduced and well continue to decline due to the small size of the site and Its Isolation from other habitat areas No trails or roads are present on the protect site The protect site Is largely surrounded by existing residential development and Interstate 210, and does not contain substantial scenic resources 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or htstoncal aspects o/the mte Gte all sources of m(ormation (books, published reports and oral history) The protect site has not been Identified as having a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site Acwrding to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Including the protect site 11) Descnbe any noise sources and !hart levels that now affect the site (aircreR, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl aflect proposed uses Existing traffic noise levels surrounding the protect site are mainly from traffic noise generated on the adtacent Interstate 210 and arterial roadways The protect site Is located interior to any arterial roadways The southern edge of the property is adtacent to Interstate 210 and Its westbound offramp for Day Creek Boulevard 12) Describe the proposed pro/act in detail This should provide an adequate description o(the site in terms of ultimate use that will result /tom the proposed protect Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) dnecessary The proposed protect consists of the construction of a 30 lot single-family residential development located to the north of Interstate 210 east of Day Creek Boulevard south of Secretariat Drive, and west of Stable Falls Avenue In the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The proposed protect wilt consist of 30 single- family residences covering a total of 8 85 acres with a density of 3 4 DUTAC All site Improvements well be constructed m one phase Lot sizes will range from a minimum of 7,215 square feet to a maximum of 24 195 square feet The average lot size well be 10 040 square feet Initial Study Pan 1 doc Page 3 of 9 / ~ Created on 7!21/2004 9 26 00 AM 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and an/ma/s and any cultural, histonral, or scen/c aspects Indicate the type of land use (res/dential, commercial, etc ), lntens/ty of land use (one-faintly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The existing land uses surrounding the site are single-family/low-densely residential (<0-4 DU/AC) to the _ north Interstate 210 to the south single-family resldentlal (very low density, 0-2 DU/AC) t$ the east, and low density residential (0-4 DU/AC) to the west Land to the west is not currently developed Land to the north and the east are developed with residential uses 14) Wd/ the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ No The proposed protect is consistent with adtacent land uses All development well comply with City development standards and will be consist with the existing pattern scale, and character of the general area surrounding the protect site 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How well these • nose levels affect ad/acent propert/es and on-s/te uses What methods of soundproo(ng are proposed2 Temporary increases in ambient noise levels will occur dunnq construction of the proposed protect All off-road construction equipment is required to have a properly operated and maintained muffler `.J EquipmenUvehicle staging will be conducted as far as practible from occupied dwellings The protect will comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance An increase In traffic volume associated with the completion of the proposed protect will not perceptibly detenorate existing ambient noise levels '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o(mature or scenro trees No mature or scenic trees are present on the protect site 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into wh/ch the sde drams The protect site does not drain into any bodies of water Initial Study PaA 1 doc Page 4 0/ ~ Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estrmates) For further clanficatron, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 , a Resrdentral (gal/day) 18.000 00 Peak use (gal/Day) 36.000 00 • b Commercralllnd (gal/day/ac) 0 00 Peak use (gal/mmlac) 0 00 19) Indreate proposed method o(sewage disposal ^ Septrc Tank ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolatron tests I! discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estrmates) For further clan(catron, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenbal (gal/day) 8.100 00 b Commeroialllndustnal (gal/day/ac) 0 00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number ofresidenbalunits 30 Detached (indicate range of parcel saes, minimum lot size and maxrmum lot srze The minimum lot size is 7 215 square feet The maximum lot srze is 24 195 square feet The pad sues range from a minimum of 6 071 square feet to a maxrmum of 21 535 square feet Attached (indicate whether units are rental or /or sale units) 21) Antcipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $600.000 00 to $800.000 00 Rent (per month) $ to $ 221 Speufy number of bedrooms by unit type Housing product is not detailed at this time, however, ased on adjacent neighborhoods, pnces are xpected to range from $600,000 to $800,000 Number of bedrooms by unit type is not determined at this time however units are anticipated to be 3-5 23) Indicate anbcipated household srze by unit type Anticipated household s¢e is not determined at this time • • Ini0al Study Part 1 doc Page 5 0} y /~ ~ ~ Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be res~dmg within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate • School Districts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary Not determined at this time b JumorH~gh Not determined at this time c SemorMgh Not determined at this time COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o(use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mshtuhonal uses w, 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or mshtubonal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operehon 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Shift Time o(Mawmum Shift 29) Provide breakdown of anhcipated/ob class~ficahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdmatton of fhe rate of hire (or each c/assi(cahon (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30) Est~mahon o/the number of workers to be hued that currently reside m the City •31) For commercaa/and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Duality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) Imlial Sludy Part 1 doc Page 6 of ~ ~ ~ Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their abikty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please indicate their response Protect sponsors have contacted and met with the Rancho Cucamonqa Flre Protection Dlstnct (RCFPD) to ensure that the protect can be serviced by the RCFPD The RCFPD has approved an application for the addition of sprinklers to residential units in a cul-de-sac situation with a length greater than 600 feet The Cucamonqa Valley Water Dlstnct (CVWD) has determined that It can provide adequate fire flow to the roiect site The CVWD also provides wastewater treatment and Is antiapated that the CVWD has the abl11Y to orovde adequate wastewater service to the proposed protect 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any u§e, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals2 Examples of hazardous and/or towc matenals mGude, but are not limited to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, pestic/des and herbicides, /ue/s, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o/any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well es the dates of use, if known In the known history of this property there has not been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals at the protect site 34) Will [he proposed profect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans The protect well not generally Involve the use storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Construction activities may Involve the temporary use and storage of hazardous and/or toxic materials at the protect site Such materials may Include (but are not Ilmited to) fuel, oils solvents, lubricants, and paints Handling and disposal of materials will comply with Federal State and local regulations I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and informabon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I /urther understand that /information maybe required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cuc onga ~~ Date ~+•~ Ztr 4~~~ Signature Title ~•~~'~"'~ • r~ L_J L Initial Study Part 1 doc Page 7 of 9~ ~O Created on 7!21/2004 9 26 00 AM ATTACHMENT A Water Usaoe Average use per day Restdenttal Single-Family ApUCondo Commerctal/Industnal General and Regional Commerctal Nelghborhood Commerclal General Industnal Industnal Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Restdentlal Single-Family ApUCondos • Commerctal/Industnal General Commerclal Nelghborhood Commerctal General Industnal Heavylndustnal Source Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct Master Plan, 6/00 600 gal/day 400 gal/day 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 2,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac w. 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac Initial Stutly Parl 1 doc Page B,of 9 ~~ ( Created on 7/21/2004 9 26 00 AM ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Distracts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sutte F Rancho Cucamonga, Callfomla 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla 91739 (909) 899-2451 Hlgh School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West Sih Street Ontano, Callfornla 91762 (909) 988-8511 r1 Irotial Study Part 1 doc Pa e 9 ~~~ Created on 7127 /2004 9 26 00 AM W 0 _~__~z_.fe. am zazz _r,-+~. /~ •Tenk I~ I ~ 4 r li ~ .r t~~ Jv~r~ 1 ' I -Tr'I ~ 1 ( / PI ~rsro II / / ~ 11`1 1 ~`^ l I~~ ~ ~~ ,I 1 ` \,\ I.~-' / J; ill `911 __ 1 ~a _,r• \ 1 ~----' ;I y j .. ______ ,ao. f •_•___~ _ / II 4 \~ `~~`\ ~~ II \ _y1 •~•._~--r 1 I /`rsaa ~ ~ ---,1~ ~c~ i _ ~,.._._-r~`.~,"~-~`~~ o ,~~fTe~ativ Tract 168k • '.,~ ~.s~ 1 I ~~ A D I _ MIT I ~I 1\ '~_ .q`~i~ ~._ ~'/ \ i=-: p =r==eec _=11===v 153d ® 28 150 II 1 II ~y II 1 11 ~ . ~~~ ~l ;~ 1 ~JI/ 11 11 ~ ~ ~ 11 11 11 ii / ~ n ~ir6JG 1 ~ i All I ~~~ it II 11 Q ~ 1'-- II II 1 / IR I r1- 11 li _ 4` ~ I ~ vl~ 11 II II T-~ 1 ~f. ,1 ill! 1 _ ° n- --~~~` ~ ¢' ;1 /' 11513 1 -" in98 L\ q I-'AVENUE 11 _.i 1 1 u 1( Ga41nq . - ; _.-.. . „, 1 • . I lain III SIdt10n ~ r+ 't j .. A US s / r II I 1 II II ~ ( \~~'~~ ~ ~ _g~~~~ ~ • ~~ I' I I II ~ r ~~ '~ I ~ II II 1 ~ ~ G°) _ ~ I _, r~, L' i ~ ill I~ 1.1 'I k` - _ ~ _ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ x ; _~, F ~_. • ~ =Nass,r==axsm s.aa... I ~ ~ IJI 1 .. i ._==i. :.:~___= II_-=F~ ___ ---~~- ~ s:e. nE ___ t1 i u r... ~r :. Iwantla ~. it Q 1 ' ~~-'r"' ..ea.cw- Tli-: ciwel. ` 1 ';III "` yE a4 Frte.. ~. ~~- it i w _ w.. uv ssl uv , rl ~i _..,;,y;v _ Station _ u s „.-~1 -t •11 .[w u.rz rile wfdwils r '~` ~ III ; '_ _ _ . ~ •-J~ 1' I' ~t~N NISfS fNO1MEEf5 S [TOfS +-1.--/ III _ ~w'/ ~ ^•• I~. _y_ ~ _ ____ __-_ _a ________ -- 1 -, i5 ~,.../~^,~i~,~~ '~'I - -_____x359 E 1.. 1 . `I ` 1' ~I II i I VIII _ ; ~ _ ~ ~ •i li 11 II II '1 . '( 1~~ ______ 1 I' I I' II Y-- ~ _ 11 I~ III _ ~~~(~ _ , . ~ Etiwanda • I _, InGrapeland I it it In . -,u; ~~ v'L._:.. ~ '_'- ____ _____________________________ ,.. -- von on• ~ nGt 459aWm F nainuJ~ - ,'~- - - -_ --- - _ i ---___ _ - ~.=n~..--=-=~ T _. _, ; . _ n ~~~~~ Nd ~T ~L- r ~ r ar I 20 12 I 19 13 r - - - I ~ ~ ~ 15 16 10 / 9 /8~ 4~ ~ ~~~ n ~A~ erE :::. - rn~ur~^~ • DEVELOPMENT,INC 17780 FITCH STREET. SUITE 120 IRVINE. CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1055 FAX (949)863-0065 AID A & J RESOURCES, INC 0 SCALE f=150' 21 1 ~ 24 ~ 7 h - - 5 14 13 ~ 2 s -Q 29 ~ ~~, 27 -2s e ~~; --- _9e 1 I la-: I .~ ~~ , ~I a FAA 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APR 0 6 2004 RECEIVED -PLANNING TENTATIVE TRACT No.16~ I RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 i~5"i --'rr.,. -aa,",e9 z ~, a PARED BYE ~ .,.. PARS FDk DrVtLOPM@NI, INC ~ 77780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1055 FAX (949) 863-0065 ANJ A &J RESOURCES, INC TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-30 ~~s' PHOTOGRAPH N0.1 ~~.~d~.~' DATE PREPARED APPoL 5, 2004 CRY CP R4NCH0 CUCAMONOA COUMY OF 8AN BEFiNAROND, STATE OF CALFOFiWA .~®w.~mam,row-iu.~.....c w~. ~ ~' -b~ ' 't µ a ~ a a~ ® :;~ ~= ~,~ ~ ~DEYEiOPMENR, IPIC 17786 FITCH STkEET, SUITE t20 ~~~~~ TRACT No.16 RESIDEN?lAL LOTS IRVINE, OA 92814 PHONE (949) 863-1050 I~~Z~ PAPS o ~ FAX (949) 863-0055 /~~~ AKD ~~~.qY! DATE Pf~PARED~ APPoL 5, 2004 A & J RESOURCES, WC ~. ~ ea~cH~ ~,~,,~y y ~ ~ a,,~aTt: of ca~.rowaa I ,- ~~ ,. ~~ ~ :;:. ~~r~ rev(-io~r~~tii, e~c 17180 FITCH STREET, SUITE 12G IRVINE CF, 92614 PrIONE (949) 86~+1055 FAX (4~9) 863-0065 ~1~ A 8 J RESOURCES, fNC ><'~. N +~ r. '€v .~, ~ tY v '- %' :'K~y . ~-(F~ ~ tom: l~w~ _. ¢K ~ r,M r r :."'. c t"e t p'h'i ;3,i1{ PFI~A1~ Bri ~ .,.. PF~I~^F\OFi DEVrLOPMENI, INC 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-7065 FAX (949) 863-0065 AMID A & J RESOURCES, INC TENTATIVE TRACT No.16~ RESIDENTIAL LOTS ~~a~ PHOTOGRAPHaN0.24 CITY OF RANCFIO WCAMONnYa CIX1MY OF 9AN BBiNAFiDMO, BTATE OF CALFOF78A ~,A . - k~d..~¢ ~ •~ w 'mo - ^Myt_Ik-1~->`_ _ ~ 4 ` y~.}, Y y~~ >~ - ..~ ~8pi• ~y a 1 ' uC.~+;,t , 4, `~uM - s ~-_ ~ - -~ y Y'. ~ ~ _y , ri:nS 5 s h~ t ~`-~h~~~ ' ii~at; L;~~~"~' - ` ` _ ~=t ' ~ . , : ' ... s _ -'L LL' ~ } 5 2;*~ '~~ ~. , ,( t n „ M ai~~ - ..- -4 ~ ~.r + +-' ^Y ~ ~~ i ` a . ^~^ y ~ ' r ,~' r. - " ~ ~- i ` , v r? ~` t :. - . . _ r` ~ ~,~ . , . . t - .~ .+ ` Fa~f ,t.~" 1 'ar: «~ .dun 3 --a~»-. .y.,?~,~,~.W fir` -. ^'; ,~'i ~`~t.j{}r .-. ~~ * 1"H. ~ r+~ ...L t. ° -r °- ~'(r C~ `~ ~? ~`~ '~' T~ ' ^ _ ,q F.-' . a Y ' *~ " w.+. -~ri ;c ,,.2 - ,@.'~_^S. .a -`+na` ,.r t' ?" 'ii i r"s ~ ~ :~ P':i. °E ' ~ x 3 ` !-~: ~"3 -'" 'Ra T ` -~ , _ .. . 6 ; ... y ar..,,.v - . ; „ pr y,. ~'.. - s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~~ - 'y ~-'",' ~ ~~~4 ; ~"~t~lv wy „ r ~ ~ y .'. - ew: '~e~ _ -i.~#~4 _ ~ ~~`*4-.'Z_ i+R~~ _ ' "~' '~..t rr~,~"__ ;~~ iF w^v~.~ ..°,^eM-, i'J,1 ~ ej ••`.Ar~ .. s ~ n' " . ~ ` ` ~ ~ ~ . -r,R . _ ~4 - Yrr'r ~`-.!a"!S. ~. ..a~ . _ PFI~AF~ Sri .i.. ~` rli~/YnI rMT ~ DEVELOPMENT, INC TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 720 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-30 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949)863-1055 S NO FAX (949)863-0065 . `~~aa PHOTOGRAPH A~ 2004 D APPoL 5 , DATE PREPARE INC A & J RESOURCES , CRY OF RANCh10 CUCAMONOA COLMY OF 9AN B6N,4R01~10, SiAlE OF CALEOFWA ~v -ti ~r .~~ . •_~X" _ ~ ' € .t~~ mro•~R~ fyda F^ _ _-_ _ y a °'AiY.. ~_ t~ gg w. a~f. iRd` ^f Il, i :ni~'i a= ' ~: /F H-~ ' - r r ~ ~.~ _ yam', 4 £y'gy~y `~ V' \ y f ~ ~~"~ -_ ~~3 n y- }emu i'^'WS~...~+''+~t~'vx,..t~'~.~~ s N •'~vc~f~}Yt~a:~4q> ~ .- -~._ ~. x'10, - _ rY._ - _ - __.. PF~AFi®Bri ~ .,.. PF~'AF /~^F\~OFA DEVEIOPMENI, INC. 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1055 FAX (949)863-0065 APD A & J RESOURCES, INC Ip - -~ •'1'L- _ ~~,2 " `; ~ - 1~" .. _. t ~ - t V ' tl~~~y~Y ,. ~ ~ a; ar 5,r~~ry,` ,-_W ,~' "_ w,.y 4F~ z s Y r ~ ~, , ':f '4'T~S6yY ., ,r J. =c T TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16~ RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 ~~-30, PHOTOGRAPHpN0.26 CRY OF RANCkO CUCAMONOA COUMY OF 8AN 89WARDNO, STATE CF CAt.FOW~GA x- ter. ~ _ •+~ ui!-°~i}155 .mil _ y ~ ., fy rte, f f ~ ~ _ .. ..• ~ ,I`~ - KEH ~ xy a1[ - '_ r ~ -^• l - s.jti,! y '~.r.= ' ' _- `v{. '-r'•-:.~.. ':~-S-e~ ~*'~++~f`:`~>~ ~;r ~~X- -~2f-~''I ,. -.. I '_q`;rss':.S h'6- s~ k~Yf~ `'4nTi c,'`a.~--. 4 ~ ~~^- SJ4 .FeJ[1, %[ 1 ~~ s ~ ~ a _ _ _ f ~ a°.4• Tt .,,,6. 'kid ~`~#'fi:a ~f ~~w~.~y~„fN~~F-F'1~ .l".`-~jj .~at _w 'p_ g~ F %s.i n..r ' ',Y`4.• •~' ~,'!d- ~Y. ~ t ' ~d ^ ~ a ~- r~ti r~14~ ~~b ~ ~f ~ 3 y 3 . V t...riLi`}' ~ ' ' ~ 4 ~ - ~~; v ~r7-'.. t c~ ~ 'i$~Y3~ i ~) :'y',7 ~~tA+ `i, ~~~~~t~F-:y F - -' p .. ~ ''' '' ^J'°~lt~- .i~ff~-'i-''°)__%~ i:.7,- " t . . _ -~_ -fr _. ~` ~~u'`-S ` r~f`,t :=''--=+. ~~~,,,YYY Y ~p`,• 11 -~1,3.~`y? ~~=-, r: ,1: ,'4.,~' .`r :` £ ` T r `" .a-'. ' ' - -'r F' 'F ~' Y 4 -t ry, .- v - `+.. ,•~• -.. _ ~ -,, " _ ;r ~V' _ ". i .5 vN _ ( , * :c ``>` , c 4 r l_b f _ [ , , :. F;T~ 1 b~ iF`i f i'"?R.t. i r - a q~aX` -d j''~' ~f- ` ~ ,w z ~ ' ~ " ~ , :r ,y _ _ .3,~=: .. , w v~,~~-~. ~ a~~~ ?9"^j1~'~-tzb ~=2_': _ - -~ ''- s~'y i fA ~ -Ai ~/~f •i" { -'~ l - '~f ~' t i f Vii -.` c'-•` 9 yl ~~ r ~ ' Sp y • ~n~.. .a "' 3 ~ X#xy,~%~,^ a,..~ _ ^~~"7; ~r "?Yy.'.` y'~.,`,"'L'!r tf~. ,~,'t-'<;i: ~ °~- ' , ` ~ ' ; ` ~ , K r 7 . A `... > e~'. `'~i..~ r= _ a 't, fr~.€. } ~-~'~ f ,h . :r ear '~t __ ._ y~ ~<-fir- ~": P..y : ~ _ :, y y~ ~.` ~' ~T §~ ~~ ~ _ y " "di''--'c .;-l'^. ` 1 p . i?'~' !r. - _ ~~-~3~{t3f~y n ~~'~FRI '1 -tl ~ ~`~9~1 ~•~~:.rn: '.Ls`~ r'te' r. `' v ~=,.y"__ , ,,i ,,.-,yt iii:^'~rc`Y`Y ;'~~«' S` ,C-f '~ M1 ~ ~ ~ #,..y~,i_CF ~{ ~ ~~^~, r~i ~`alT 'xF.;-. '<•" "'I,}'Sk-': r` ~A ~ ` ' ~~ -r In ': 4u ~ }` ~-a ~ ~ . .eY.~.~ 5 ri'•t~ ~ ~k 4 L lf~ -~Pf'~ _ _ . ~ ~ ' _ ~ : . i >. fc.. t'`» .rr °i^F S..tiv j a .3' . ~. ~-ivt _ ` ' _ P ° mo ~ ' \ '-} _ S- `~'4.T.'ei!y d + _ rlQl~/ v1 ~ n.. PF~AFI® PDFO DEVELOPMENT, INC TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-30 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949)863-1055 FAX (949) 863-0065 7 ' I ~~ 2 I PHOTOGRAPH NOe / h Y '~ Y ` J DATE PREPARED APPoL 5, 2004 INC A & J RESOURCES , CIfY C)F RANCHO OUCAMONQ0. COUIQiY OF SAN BEFWAF~NO, STATE OF CALIFORBA ~~m.a.~memAO~ouartx d; 4esroi ,. - - ~°~-,~ t~=~~ _ 1. r st ~ v',F :aE=~--•'L i - • , , r ~NR nits {'+A'i r'"M f. S...S hR< Ti'~'Y~y~i'' ~ ~' + ~ ~ - i - _ a v ", ~ ~_ .'-F ri¢~ ' I-,~~c~ ti'i!'.`SP V. R` l~C .~,}. ''S, -~=3 .,,,• 43u y~ ..,.2- ~ q"FS~R ~~ ~~qU~ ~¢ ~ ~ _ . ,.a ~y, t' >w~haf~.•' ~'`~~-~',z •a; _ t ,~ z~,i,.~ .Ye ° s^; S ~c tit ~ b, ~e s -f' ' . y ` ~ c ' ~:-`_~'~ ~ p~~ h ~.`)q~ eta ~ .$YLT ~ l ~ TM V`tf, ~ (~;y3 it„x~_ytt~ }~.,~ ~ Y ~ WtF -2 0 _o - y - _ _ •%h o ± y ~ +~ ~~ ' ~~ ~ `~ ..~` ~ ~ ,- t l `' ` SJ , i-Y, + ac~y . R t ~~ a ~ S~H~ " ~~ a: J ~ ~ ~ i " FS a'~' : % S - " ;~ `=n . € , .; ' ~ e`'1~"~~i~~,`T;~3~~`Sr-3,'it~ _. , 6L' . v ~y 4', ~ - .. - i ?. n'~c1~~, 33 ~a~~ S - _ r 4'£`_ --_ti .n~ i ~~-. .r~i"^,S.~~4'rY_ x µ't'r'jii~,i :~F' , . , } ~y ? °f:'~~'~~yc~~~*~^!~%5 _ -~~' t7~~~,+= ~ , ` _ i'~tu' ' _ 1 L Y~ ~ $ _ ~ r ~4 ' ' '.~ ~ ~' ! t :..".`.iY ' +L ~ ` h ' ~ ~~ ~ - ~~ : aa4ily ~ . +t4rr. VS "`' 3i '<'rh«: E~'' }` ~^c„~ ':`..." 7 - "-., -, ~ { 4 ~ _E C V ' ~ i ` S , f i ~. t .. 4ti ( i~ o '_ - '1.' ~ y -. ~. ~.~~C ':-'~ ti: Cvvf tYa.. ~ rt :I t' m ' ;(~ Y ` f { ~ '! „j $ !, t~ `~a_Y i^ ~y~~r~j a5+'\:Y~_*3a~ ' - , _ _ f~ .- LL d~"'-S .r§i. ~.t?#- - r y ,. ~ f I s ~ . ' rt'~ ~ ^ r ~~; e ~ t { °'•: ~x i~% . ~ ` - e ~i i- t.~- i.1i..~ - . ',-:,`.~,' - at' u 7'_`?y,''~VA~,~, .- (• ~ . ' R iF , ~ M1 ' ^ .,] , , , iJB ±t"~~,L`~}y,,"5L.4i`4^,jt Z»lt~j. "'(.c,, ° ~Y C } '.,~ ~G ~.i'~t ( ?w'a c" - a ~ ;~~ ~ . , 't ~FS ~~t o ,k+Y ~ { , " F f i: ~ -IAi 'w:•~, ~Ri M1bi' {.ti 3r'L S' ~ - " ' '-J~„,~ i' : , _ ~q'a;z, ~+siS: ir^~~,F -, ~~y mY~T,) , v _ ,y y }, ~.k;.o ~H , i°~" is'7 - ' _ _ ~ rr- ~ _ - -,x'•~r._~F4-' ` ~ ;;r ;~rk'~,~~~~~.~~*r~jS,a,~k~~;~ t ~ ; ti, f r ~ -,--a~:..: ^z~ t;,`"'",=~.k, _...;f"°:*,;~;~~r'"f~ t "~~ • ~ ' ~ sit ~pp.~.tiy~.; '~1 ~~ .v~'r : 1 _ > ~ v >"{YwH~-," O . -°~`~~u ~. „ r - a _ 1 ' =~. ~ Y ' ~ ~ -32 ~ - cE ,~ 5 - 4» +G`•. $ Yt t ' :~~s '~ ~ ~ ~'Y.=l Y V ~~, r i . .y Y Z -, y . PREPARED eri n,. OEVELOPMENI,INC TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16~ 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1055 FAX (949)663-0065 ~~ PHOTOGRAPH N0.8 '~ DATE PREPARED APPoL 5, 2004 INC A & J RESOURCES , CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNfY OF SAN SSOiAfiDIJO, STALE OF CALEORIdA ,msia ~.~ ~ - ~ , : t ~.~j~'~,f - - ~~~,r ~"~ 'y;, ;~, ~,2 ' X4'1 a w -r f;, i : t ,w i e ..-,. +~,- .~P:T4~1 k l e b4s.::¢'7i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + `rte f'; w ;.d#' ~~_. a r" y-_ ~ ~fiTy: # _ a_~i ,~ ra 94 ..y`3 y t }~ ~ Y ~~ i '_3, \~u ,jaw .~rq„y ._ .~"": ;.i .:-~.f .Y._./,4„ '4' f -akr :'L 4' ~Q f 'f ~ ~ .fi" .. _ ,. . i.i g ,' 'i• rte'. i•d~ p' f.`~~e'j~~m~'``4PC.. ~' ~R. . _ ~ ~: ' _ ;..~ ",-:if., .~~•J',•{-x r?y ~9`~"- eo C. ;.~d .~ 14. ~. 1~~ ~cE~{ ' ' -~ ~ ~ ; ~ _ ~ , c ] c=:S"~`:& -A 'F ps~si i ~ ~~`-• ~ .. is~J ',R,f-'"vf ,t+ '•~ *+~~q 'c1c ) 'rY~4..~, '~:"'T[ a.~ , A ~ .. , a'" ~^) ~ ~ ..,;,~' f 1 ~", rY~,~~RSr' .`1.'.i i e'r vi•wl~..r~y,~;~[y~ ' ^, s~ Ff +~~ ~~ I ~ P~ f ~~• .~ m' ~o'r "• ef^'. cT'~`~`.y, ~' t6 rt' 1 ' ~,~ i ' i _ r'~ Y~ i'.~n'. •" i' V . y ' eit~ ~:~ ' i S"R, .~sV,,iri~• ~f. ~ ~'~ : ~~ ~ < tli A tb °.:4 :~ r"~"~ ~it~fJ'S' ` ' AT ~ M1' I'.! f '~„ ~jM~t ~a{T'~3• ~'>y yF ~ ~~Y~S u' kY~l "~~H~~ j~ as^~t -:~, ca.' ~_ 45;~~, -+~ =c, if ., r: f`'-.';+ =- .,:.w:':ye4i.:x'. ;s'~ ~ ,~N ~ + t~;~:~ , , L , _p V~ c :., ~`w" Pf~AF® Sri ~ .,.. F~Ok PF~AI~ ^ DEYELOPMENI, INC TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 RESIDENT1AL LOTS 1-30 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 863-1055 PHOTOGRAPH N0.9 FAX (949) 863-0065 /' ~~ f al " APID F DATE PflEPARED APPoL 5, 2004 A & J RESOURCES, INC cm cF y,NCfp acaMONOA, courrrr of sAN e~NnROno, STATE aF cA~.FORwa Y .G.~'^4~`'$..j, '\M /i ~F4~x'~Z'$1' ,"'~`-~y{'~:e-lw` Li~ Yr - 'e^~`L ,^jtr ~~i-6t•~' %vi6a any ` ~w++'^~ Iw a ' jn'!°' _ f - ms's a~ a r )~ ~1L!J;~ } > r ~ ~ ~ ~g~. wry r aka u r ~-S - ~~ C ' '1 ~~z ' ^ ,{ y ;er- i i -:fry,.1~T'~.x t4 iL`•~i~~ t,1rv F ~`1 '6% ~ ~~ y~~ ~~ f ` , ~~" + ~ 3 ' a'yKr 4w Y-3c.~y' \~ ~~'7`i "~ ~~f~i r'~:. ~ r' :'"J+ ~ _- , ~ i~jl ' '.t' ya_".K7r°~ivg;~~v t'~1•g4~}~~S,wAFSSnt?;G~a~.ti` °.",~'' t ` vA`'.i-~:i•. aS 4 > 1- d" t ~~•~ ' '; 4 1: I _4}`~ `: a ~ ~ iyy Sv i it `L~v` ~~d'a.\'FI"CI.~ 1 Y to 1 _ ` 4 ' ~ .''. 'xa 4\ ~~.:- .r.y;• -",~'ii~~.i~~~3: 4>.'lc - _ ~y :+ . ' a ^~[:`%G'• r~ F ?t ~ * ~' Y " yr ~1p~f,. , _ 'G <.- S~.y,G.a /~;.~~,.~L^MC?V~E ~-" :, ; ay~ ~L+~ r h uy A~ ~i ` ~ ~~ } . i+ 4 ~ ~ >' } ~a'P •,~i~j~_}<G K //A'y!.'. ~ <C !. • ~~_:tryaf' ~7- fan ~, o ~+4'aTM... '" -f'^[. . : - ~ .. . _ ~~. 4i: ,. '.~.. Ti .'yam.- "~ r•+ ~: =:r~h~ ~. .- ~ ua :i~ .~ •°- ^'~l^ ~. ' v ~1~~t ~Q'-`^ ' 'y. ~ ~, ^s En w r_ . h. r'.. •s. v -^. '~' •¢'. ~. .} -k:. ....',lam' ~ g L°.'.' }t -t :...-`Cx v' +• '=`!_- `.a cis-. ^,zr - _ .3 ~ ,~ ~.'"t .ter.. ~;, - ri: t ~' : ^ ` .. , . ,, Z-~. : c a r .ln ' ~~ ' / •.iCw 3r~;,r'>,.•n ~-,., ~~ .,4=ys:... _ 1~~: '~~~~ -~' ~•~, pc•' ~ ` ~ ~ • ' - ..F _ v~r a ^. ~- _- ~- ,^".+..i't°. r~s}AS.;~+'#'_~•lt l ~ c^X' ,1 y .l"~ av^'K"• o-s ~,~ .• _ ^`~,r ~i .~ y3 f ~c ~,wv , _ +'. e v'x ~-L . - " ` r•'r ` " .' .." i ,a. ti ' ar r . ' PF~AF~ 8Y• ~ ... PI~AF~ FOFi NORTH DEVELOPMENT, INC SCALE ,°=,50~ TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16> ~ 17780 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 663-1055 ~~. ~~ PHOTOGRAPH N010 FAX (949) 863-0065 A!D DATE PR~AFlED~ APFt~ 5, 2004 A & J RESOURCES, INC CRY OF RANCFIO CUCAAIOPK'aT; COIRtIY OF SAN B6WA(~p, SfAIE aF CM.FdNA ° ' '. '~w~ _f.,'.',i3 5' t ~~~ ~A`'3~ ~~ ~ ,,,.~., . ~: _ ' c ~xs.~=-:? ,~ s: ~'"~4 _ '' ~. ~ __ a .,._ -~...~ ~, ~ . _ ~ ~. _ . _,,, ~~, q ~y } ~~ ~ `<Yv2isaudl$SY6'S1"r•6 u f~ ~a ~'.a ~Yy.rY ., t.-t c~ >r ~ ~~4 ~ ~y ~ ~ ' ._ .a°^y i s ' ^ "fir,.. ~` ` ` ~ „o ' ~'..~.` . ea :F` ,` ", a_a .~` Jay ' n . 3~. r.-•-• `~. ; y ~ ~ .+ . -V+!x~ } ' V YF, ,1, -s. ~' ;; ~ ---~ _ '' ~! Y ~~' Y K .S ~ !~'~ tr H*>tiii T: ~~~r M"',r ~ it }.;ytr A ', .--e~'~- rr~nr®aw ~ .... rn~~^ra~ - \ NORTH DEVELOPMENT,INC u 5°"~E '~='S°' TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16812 17760 FITCH STREET, SUITE 120 RESIDEMIAL LOTS 1-30 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE (949) 663-1055 PHOTOGRAPH N011 FAX (949) 663-0065 ~ / ~/ e~--~ A!D YM`'S7~L A & J RESOURCES, INC DATE PREPARED' APR 5, 2004 ClfY OF RANCHO CUCAYON('.fi CX%1NfY OF 34N B3iNAROHO, SPATE OF CALFOFM~lA F t t -- -- . ~ - - ,,_ ,, ',h, ~H. -1,r~. , . ~ _. , , - ~- _ ,~ ~r . . '. ~~, ~ ~- ~~ f,~~.. +• y+(» _ :,~ .-.a~~~';~.- '.- f ,.~ ~ "4 !. s N, , Lt^,f?~!~l£~s,,y~ ~°4,~ir~r„~•'r, ~ '~ .3.. ~"G a T ~e'a --`'.s , :^x''~. , . l_ ~.,a..a f i ,~ ~'~` .r,,. tlet';x w ~fha.,,.Lt .~~_ ~,, i., '+ » '> T'~"'+ to ~K :~_ '~5 -"i, , c'~ .i` ~h t, !-' , ~ _ ~S trY~ ~ i u' i!y ~i41 Y. il. t'~ - , ,4 Y j '. ~. er - - J". - ~ -c i .fii ' 3 - ~ ,3_ ~""~" i d~ d 4 ~ .'~- ~"~'' } 1 't-fin ~ q _ -, - :"'~ ~`:: ~ '~-~i,'~ti~r. ~. _~ ~,~./ ~~C.- Lt 'Tti _,.~, "]w.~{~.+dli}^e~".;~~3n",Y ~Sf ~, Q, `. _ . . "4.~e ,~~r a1•G '~): may;. F e^~:-:'~,.~` Ll/r tj. iS. .. X14• •i Y`y~ _~Fl=K'. _" ~~'Y` Y-'' V ` \ e.11~ "~_S iYlr r .%J~a' ~-73v: ~.. ~'g ~~^C,Y 3I yx1 @,~5. ~~t Y. Pii~Ai~ T3Y= W D. ~ ... f~ARi/?}~FII~ iDEVEC~PP4Eki, iPtC 17780 FITCH STREET, S~iTE 120 IRVINE CA 92814 PHONE (944) 863-105E FAX (84?)B83-OOE5 AP<D A & J RESOUPCES, fNG ` / F '."'= ,•=750' 1`EY~A~~ ~i,4Gl' 6\90.1 { E~SIDEMIAL LOTS ~ ~ ~.~~~ ~~~~~G~~~~ ~I® ~~ DfiTE PREPARffi" APWL 5, 200=. C(tY OF RANCHO CUCA6iC~iKiA:, COUNTY ~ SAtd ~dAtiaW STATE OF CALJFOF~4L ~,° ', n".+~x-~.:+W.,{C { V ~ .v. w ...~~., nm x.,-- ^+1- .Jr Y +. r-rv a,>f."` -'t' ie^~..pK'': ~~ _ ~ , "! _ _ ,~ 3 ~ y ~ .. t~ -t ~ j mod. ~ ~~ -~r { ~~r L.~:;xib~'~~ti "~~ ~ ~, s: v,~,,,t+~ ,F,,~ ~~. v.i n '~,4. ice: +, ..~ a ~ T ~ /.~_, ~ ~~~~~~ ` ,a ~ 5y ' ' _ ,y^T Y 's, f .. i' m. •'~.. evC.'Y >, ~'~, 4 ~ , ~ ]' ~: }, ' ~~.'~ T^{53 ~,y ~~ Y;_J_a_`";`=}.r a*~~]ti",t~ k.: ~i, ~v. +C~~it-X;~,.' %Y°.3 ,+ _ '%; = F ~ ~ , ~ ~ r ':b C'y~fiv YJ ^,iv`.^N,S~~ i5'. ~~~~ ."~'• '" ` x Y~ - ir~ ; o ~~,. O ~st}'„^, e r, _j 1 x •-~c, • ,} ; ry .'.~i rju ^..1. ~, ~ ,~ ~7: .y ~.. ~d+ ~-1{1 a ~' .'.a.... '°'t . 4 + h' '.r' - e ~ c `e z _ « ~ .. LL-'gam^' .:5'a v,., ,.: y' - +° .fig` ~ `..7. , ' t.. ~ e-... ~-BSI 't • v d - i'4,-~r °.Ay"~;~'f ~ 9'"l~' ~ '4`t' aw'+`L .r ~,~ _ -. _ ~ ~~,~,~~.' qty , - ~kd '~+t ~~~a9 `~~'~~~y. ~ ~~~ ter':` ~-:: "fin ~ ~ _.i ~-. S^ ' Pi~Ai~ HIF a D ~ :::, ~a~ r~ ti~ ~OF~E1ilPMFwT, ItvC, +' V~ lllll~~~~JJ~~J!!! S,. ` _,~~• ~ ~~q~~;~1V~ TflACT ~o. 1~~12 17780 FITCH STREET', SUfie 120 RESIDEMIAL LOT31-30 IRVINc CA 92614 PHONE (949)863-1056 ~ /y~~ ~~/~~/^1 ~/"~~ /~ ~p (i (~ p~ ~~ FAX (S4~)86.^x7066 (r~/'//' {(~1~~ 1w1~111~`./i~J /IpJ~~I W ILI\UVI A~ DATE PR6'AFIED' AFPo15, 2004 A & J RESOURCES !NC CITY ~ FiAttGYiO CUCAA~Ait6P, ~1)YtY OF SAM SERItA[iC~'O, STATE OF CALFOE~A City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: SUBTT16812 2. Protect Description. TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16812 -BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC - A request to subdroide 8 85 gross acres of land into 30 single-family lots~in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) located on the north '9~de of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue - APN 0225-161-19, 0225-161-32, 0225-161-33, and 0225-161-34 3 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: BCA Development, Inc 17780 Fitch Street, Suite 120 Irvine, CA 92614 4 General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 5 Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is surrounded to the north and east by existing . single-family residential development, to the south by the 210 Freeway westbound off-ramp onto Day Creek Boulevard, and to the west vacant land with Day Creek Boulevard lying further west 7. Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8. Contact Person and Phone Number Dan Coleman, Prinapal Planner (909)477-2750 9. Other agenaes whose approval is regwred (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -Regional Water Quality Control Board Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Valley Water Distract -Water and Sewerage connection permits GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water Distract EIR-Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ~ ,f~ WQMP -Water Quality Management Plan 57(i • Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages Biological Resources Hazards & Waste Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities & Service Systems Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology & Water Quality Noise Recreation (x) Air Quality (x) Geology & Soils (x) Land Use & Planning () Population ~ Housing () Transportationlfraffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (x) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or °Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared Reviewed B /iN ~/Uate /~~~ Q~ B r nt Le ~~,~D~ate JuIk2004 ~~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less T1,en .SleeInCBN Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potennelly S~en'ncant vino Mrtigenon mar. sipnincent No i eM i~~ rayed i a<+ i en EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buldings w~thm a State Scenic i~ighway~ c) Substantially degrade the existing ,visual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway and the surrounding area is characterized by vacant land and single-family home development to the north and east The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect and, in fact, given the weedy appearance of the mixed vegetation on-sde, the development will tend to °clean up" the appearance Design review is required poor to approval City standards requre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of Olumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Pnme Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh ewstmg zoning for agncultural use, or O O O (/) a W illiamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses tE-~'I ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Lass men Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotanha~~y Sig^~ficant wain Mihpahpn man Significant No 1 an Inco n3tad I act I an Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located in a tightly built surrounded area with the 210 Freeway running along the south of the site, some vacant land to the west used for illegal dumping, and single-family homes to the north and east There are approximate'1y 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located in a tightly built surrounded area with the 210 Freeway running along the south of the site, some vacant land to the west used for illegal dumping, and single-family homes to the north and east The nearest agricultural use is more than a mile south from the prolect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/act () () () (/) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the a) I applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase O O O (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the prolect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations ~~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Lass Then Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotanoaAy Spnihcent With Mingafion Then Significant No I ea Inco retetl I as I act was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protest site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the~Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures Imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAt3MD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ~~~a. C~ • • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Clty if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operatjons during thigh winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph),m accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water fguality Control Board [RWaCB]) daily to reduce PMfp emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain sigmficant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,p would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatrvely significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result m significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters u Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Lass mangy $ipnitlcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potannally $,pnd¢ant wdn Miopet,on man Spmucant No I act Incv rated I C 1 act 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 11) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-strapping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase In operational emissions as a significant unavoidable ~~~~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Lea4 man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenhally Sipnihcant wan Mmpeaon man Sip,nhcent No I ect Into tea I acY I ct adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR' identified the citywide increase irY emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identfied in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor (adtacent residential homes) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be . generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-signficant levels e) Typically, the home construction and the occupation of homes as proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Senrice~ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () (~) ( ) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means l~~ ~ C~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Sipmfcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pmenbally SipnNCent wan MNpabon man Sipnihcent No I act Into ,atetl I act I act d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (~) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory ' wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (~) protecting biological resources, ,such as a tree ~ preservation policy or ordinances " f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with single-family homes with the 210 Freeway along the south side of the site The site has been previously disrupted during construction of the 210 Freeway and surrounding residential development According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, the protect site is within an area identified as Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat sensitive biological resources A biological assessment was prepared for the site by LSA Associates (August 24, 2004) including field surveys conducted in May and August 2004 The survey documents that the site supports alluvial fan sage scrub, a vegetation type of the region that is considered sensitive by State and Federal resource agencies The survey also found wildlife species known to live in alluvial fan sage scrub community None of these observed wildlife are listed as threatened or endangered species by State and Federal resource agencies The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) reports California gnatcatcher (federally listed as threatened species) sighting one mile south of the site (1998) and about two miles north of site (1994) The CNDDB also reports one record of a San Bernardino "Merriam" kangaroo rat (federally listed as endangered species) from about two miles northeast of site (2000) Substantial development of homes has occurred within atwo-mile radius of the site since these reports were documented in the CNNDB According to Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, a sensitive habitat must be 1), one which plays a special role in perpetuating a species using the habitat on the protect site, and 2) without which would be substantial danger that the population of that species would drop below self perpetuating levels In order to have a substantial effect, loss or harm of habitat would have to 1) cause a species or a native plant or animal community to drop below self-perpetuating levels on a statewide or regional basis, or 2) cause a species to become threatened or endangered The biological assessment concluded that it is highly unlikely that the California Gnatcatcher or San Bernardino kangaroo rat are present on the subtect property The development site is surrounded by existing development and roadways and not part of a migration corridor Therefore, it is unlikely that development will adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals The impact is considered less-than-significant b) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the protect site is within an area identified as Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat sensitive biological resources A biological assessment was prepared for the site by LSA Associates (August 24, 2004) including field surveys conducted in May and August 2004 The survey documents that the site supports alluvial fan sage scrub community of the mature "climax" stage of ecological succession, however, concludes that the sites isolation has eliminated the natural fire, flooding, and erosion ecological processes ~-~~~s~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Lass man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aatanaalY Significant wan Mmpa4on man Sipmfirant No I act Into ratatl I act 1 en needed to support the community No riparian habitat exists on-site The impact is considered less-than-significant c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources ~, d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur , 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project O O O (`~) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (~) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O ('~) O ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) ~ Disturb any human remains, including those O O O (~) interred outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activrty, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) I( any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• ~~ ~~ • Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sipraficant Lau Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pofanllally Sigmhcanf Wah Mnipaoon Than Sipnifiwnf No I act Inco rafetl 1 act I acf • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project ~ effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- mfluence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstructlon field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 t Less 7nen Sigrvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Po~enLel~r Sgntl¢em wen Mnigseon ,nen S,pnificent No I ect Inco ,atoE I ect I etl d) The proposed prolect is m an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been at least partially disrupted by (construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated w.. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, injury, or death involving ~) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist far the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (~) ' uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction ro) Landshdes~ O O O (~) b) Result in substantial sod erosion or the loss of () (~) () ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (~) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result ~ of the prolect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (~) use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments. a) The site is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, however, the Red Hill Fault passes 5 mile to the northwest of the site The fault is capable of producng Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„ 7 5 earthquakes, and the San Andreas fault, capable of up to M,„ 8 2 earthquakes, are both located northwesterly of the site Each of these taults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bulding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant ~~ • Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Leaa rnan Sgrvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially 9gnificant wren lNOgafion rnan Signhtant Ne I act Inca ated I act I C b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to lest-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~q emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,q emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~q emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Greenfield Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Greenfield Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils are typically slightly vulnerable to erosion, have low runoff potential, and slight soil pressure allowance No adverse impacts are anticipated A soils study is a routine requirement for all construction projects on raw land and the report will identify any site specific areas of concern and methods to address e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed ~_~ 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project () () () (~) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or dis osal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment ~~~~9- Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less men S,p~uficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Paeneally Significant wnn Miagaton Tnen Siprificanl No I el Into tetl I I ct c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existin or ro osed school d) Be located on a site which Is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials saes compiled pursuant to w~ Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would It create a significant hazard to the ublic or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result In a safety hazard for eo le residin or workin in the ro ect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for eo le residm or workin in the ro ect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with () () () (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emer enc evacuation lane h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wlldlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not Include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide Interagency coalition that Is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that Is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels well reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse Impacts are anticipated C~ c) The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the residential use does not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums but did reveal some minor illegal ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant Wah MNgaban Then Significant No 1 x1 Into tatl I cl I C dumping of what appeared to be old couches and bedding Beyond that, no potentially hazardous materials were discovered on-site No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly hinds No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 r-~ LJ 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect O O (/) ( ) a) Violate any water qualdy standards or waste dischar ere uirements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () (/) () ( ) intertere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which ermits have been ranted ~ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff f Otherwise substantiall de rade water ualit ~ / ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Then 5,9~ficanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g ru~enwnr 5igrvfioN wuh MNpaton Than Sipmfinnt No I ct Inca tetl I a I n g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (~) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation ma ? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (~) structures that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including floodin as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by se~che, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (~) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and .will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems A construction protect resulting in the disturbance of one acre or more regwres an National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The developer is regwred to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Adherence to measures included in the SW PPP will reduce potential water quality impacts to aless-than-significant level b) According to the CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins The CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it ~s not wthin an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excevabon, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, the CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the consVuction of future water faalities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bulding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river A Hydrology Report (MDS Consulting, June 2, 2004) was prepared and concluded that the protect will not adversely impact downstream properties All runoff will be conveyed to existing stone dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the Flows The proposed storm flows that drain into Day Creek Drainage Basin will be collected and conveyed into a proposed storm drain system which will connect to an existing 30-inch storm drain line within Stable Falls Avenue and which eventually connects to th/e~exdis~'t]in'~g Day Creek Flood Control Channel A Grading l t j -i~ .~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Sgnifipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sigmfirant WN MNgaOOn man Significant No I act Into orale0 I d I ct and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site A Hydrology Report (MDS Consulting, June 2~ 2004) was prepared and concluded that the protect will not adversely impact downstream properties All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than one acre, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (MDS Consulting, June 7, 2004) was prepared that identifies the following Best Management Practices (BMPs) mitigation measures 1) Roof runoff will be directed to vegetated swales in private yards for partial cleansing before entering the streets. 2) Efficient irrigation techniques will be detailed in prospective buyer disclosure packages. 3) An educational packet will be distributed to all homeowners upon final walk-hrough to provide information on recycling, pesticide, and fertilizer use and good house keeping practices. 4) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect ~~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Sigmfinnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially s,emfirsnt Wiln Mnigaoon Than significant No I ct Incro ateE I n I Lti site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected t) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the pro/ect a Ph sicall divide an established communit ~ () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mill atin an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () (/) ( ) Ian or natural communit conservation lane Comments• a) The site is sort of a pocket of undeveloped land surrounded by existing recently developed single-family homes Development of the protect will simply be an extension of the existing surrounding development b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential which allows a density range of 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre (the site is proposed to be developed at a density of 3 3 dwelling units per acre) c) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the protect site is within an area identified as Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat sensitive biological resources A biological assessment was prepared for the site by LSA Associates (August 24, 2004) including field surveys conducted in May and August 2004 The survey documents that the site supports alluvial fan sage scrub community of the mature "climax" stage of ecological succession, however, concludes that the sites isolation has eliminated the natural fire, flooding, and erosion ecological processes needed to support the community No riparian habitat exists on-site The impact is considered less-than-significant 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use lane ~~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Sigrvfionl Las Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgnificant with M,Oga4on man Sigmfipnt No I h In letl I d I d Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact ~ ~ LJ 11. NOISE Would the protect result m () (/) () ( ) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other a encies~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise O O O (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the ro ect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existin without the ro ect~ e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicmrty of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out due to proximity to the 210 Freeway along the south site boundary A Noise Impact Study was prepared for the protect (Giroux and Associates, October 21, 2004) that recommends wall heights ranging as high as 16 feet along the south tract boundary to reduce noise levels to below established thresholds The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Construct sound attenuation barriers along the south tract boundary per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Giroux and Associates, October 21, 2004). This sound barrier shall be constructed as early as possible during construction of this project 2) Construct homes with special sound attenuating features per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Giroux and Associates, October 21, 2004). ~ ~'s~s Initial Study for SUBTT16612 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Leas roan Significant Las Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenaally Significant NNn MNpa4on roan Sipnficanl No i n into tea i n i n 3) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 4) The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, mcludmg Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6) constructton or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Sectton 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 7) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) Residential use is not expected to generate ground vibration As such, no impacts are anticipated ~~~ ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Thin Sigrufimn~ Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pa~entuliy Sipn,fion~ wU, A4UgaUOn Thin Sigrufiranl No i n inm im i n i n c) The primary source of ambient nose levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient nose levels within the vicinity of the protect Noise from the 210 Freeway to the south will be mitigated per sound wall installation as specified above d) See a)response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan hor within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 6 miles northerly~of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticpated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticpated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect () () (~) ( ) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other mfrastructure)7 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect consists of the development of 30 homes Based upon on the California Department of Finance's 2004 Population and Housing Estimates, the average person per household m Rancho Cucamonga is 3 183 persons per unit The protect would cause an approximate increase in population of 95 people The protect will make additional housing units available, however, since the protect does not include any fob generating uses (other than construction fobs), and due to the relatively small size of the development compared to the total amount of residential development currently existing in the area, the impact is considered to be less-than-significant Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area b) The protect site contains no existing housing units and conversely will foster the construction of more housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Signifiranl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenYally S,gnifinnt wM MiUgaUOn Thin Sigrvfipnl No I ct Inco led I cl I c1 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant w environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other performance () (~) () ( ) ob/echoes for any of the public services a) Flre protection b) Police protections O O O (~) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Parks () () () (~) e) Otherpubhcfacdities~ O O O (~) Comments: a) The site, located on the north side of the 210 Freeway east of Day Creek Boulevard, would be served by a fire station located approximately one mile from the protect site The protect well not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities The proposed design would create a public street in excess of 600 feet from nearest secondary access, hence, would significantly impact response times and fire protection service The Fire District has approved an alternate method for a single point of access The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Residential fire sprinklers shall be installed on Lots 1 through 25. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval well require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Distracts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than a mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect wtll not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the ~~Z ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than $ign,fipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Folen6any SiBn~finnt wnn Mmga4on man Significant No I C In IeE 1 h I C General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the proleclted need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City , 14. RECREATION. Would the prolect () () () (~) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and , regional parks or other recreational faahties such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or O O O (~) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than a mile from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above • 15. TRANSPORTATIONlTRAFFIC Would the prolect () () (~) ( ) a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersechons)~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () () (~) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (~) feature (e g, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) ~`~ Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Sigrofirant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Votenfially Sigrufitant win Mmgaaon man Sign,ficant No 1 h Into te0 1 ct I ct f) Result in inadequate parking capaaty~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus tumours, bicycle racks) Comments a) The protect will generate 300 vehicle trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of 30 single-family homes It is estimated that each unit will generate 10 trips daily, 7 trips in the a m peak hour and 1 trip in the p m peak hour As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards The City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Because of existing development surrounding the proposed protect site and compliance with City ordinances, the increase in traffic generated by the proposed protect is considered less-than-significant b) As discussed above, the quantity of vehicular trips generated by the proposed 30 homes is minimal The protect will generate 210 taps in the a m peak hour and 30 taps in the p m peak hour, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trip threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all area street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) ~~~ ~~ • Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less man Sig~ufifanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pole^luily $~grufitanl wm MNgafion man Sigrvfionl No I ct In tetl 1 d 1 C UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the 16 . project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the a licable Re ionat Water Qualit Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () ,. () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause si nificant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause si nificant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the rovider's existin commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste dis osal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) re ulations related to solid waste Comments. a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional - Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated C_~ c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signficant d) The protect is served by the CVW D water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatm/,ent plant located within Rancho Cucamonga ~~ W I Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less roan Signifinnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources FolenGally SiBmfirant won MNpa4on roan Siprufiont No I n In lea I C I ct and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction an~ Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50, percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Division Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction andlor demolition protect g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures ..~Mc.d ..,,lh ea oza Thnrafnre nn Imnartc are antiaoated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (~) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California histo or rehisto ~ b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually O O O (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of robable future ro ects ~ c) Does the protect have environmental effects that O O O (~) will cause substantial adverse effects on human bean s, either direct) or indirect) ~ Comments: a) The 8 85-acre protect site is within a suburban area surrounded on three sides by residential development and on the fourth by the 210 Freeway Although native habitat is present on the site, it has been degraded by on-site disturbances including trespassing and illegal dumping Habitat value of the site is further reduced by its isolation from larger blocks of native habitat and by the exclusion of natural ecological process The site is not within designated or proposed critical habitat for threatened or endangered species, it is highly unlikely that threatened or endangered species are present on the site No significant cultural, historic, or paleontologic resources have been identified within the protect limits Adherence to standard City and State measures related to the discovery, recovery andlor recordation of cultural resources and/or human remains during construction ~~ i Initial Study for SUBTT16812 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Tian Signfipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Parentally sign,fipm WN MNga4on TTan Sigrufiont Na 1 C Inw oratetl I [1 I cl activities will ensure no significant Impact to cultural resources will result from implementation of the proposed protect b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along the certification of a Program FEIR, Flnding5 of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result In significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse Impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include ,reduced overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space Wlth these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts Is required c) Development of the site as proposed would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions • of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Mitigation measures, identified In the Initial Study, would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed ~s~ 3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16812 Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (x) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 19$9) (x) Hydrology Report (MDS Consulting, June 2, 2004) (x) Revised Noise Impact Study (Giroux & Associates, October 21, 2004) (xi) Biological assessment (LSA Associates, August 24, 2004) (x) Water Quality Management Plan (MDS Consulting, June 7, 2004) • • [t ~~~7 Nov-03-O4 03:09vm from-BCA 8499630065 T•i 2 F If2/002 F••2Ti Irirtiel Study for Ck~~ of Renoho ~, ut>cmanga SUBTl"1881Z ~-.~_~- Face28 APPLICANT CER71F1CgTI0N I certify that 1 am the appNrarrt for the proles[ described in this Initial Study. I aclvxrnredn. Ufa: I h~rve read this In~al Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, !have r: vistul ttn prajaot plate or proposals and/or hereby agree to Ute proposed mftlgatlon measures to avoid t,io ef};cs or nfttlgat,t fte effects to a pour[ whe srgnificard mental efferas would occur AppllcanYs Signature: per- a%_!LLS^a ~'_Y w PrvrtNameandTlfle: ~~•+ c.A~t>~s.S+.r ~~I~a~.- ~U'F~, i • ~ ~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being arculated for public review m accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Project Fde No : Tentative Tract SUBTT16812 Prolect Name. Public Review Penod Closes: December 8, 2004 Prolect AppliEant: BCA Development, Inc Prolect Location (also see attached map):, Located on the north side of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue - APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, and 34 Prolect Descnption• A request to subdivide 8 85 gross acres of land into 30 single-family lots in the Low Residential Distract (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Related file Variance DRC2004-00566 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The prolect fde and all related documents are available for review at the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review penod. December 8. 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By u ~~~~ • RESOLUTION NO 04-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812, A SUBDIVISION OF 30 LOTS ON 8 85 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 210 FREEWAY OFF RAMP AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND THE WEST SIDE OF STABLE FALLS AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, AND 34 A Recitals ~. 1 BCA Development, Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16812, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located north of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue, wrath an approximate street frontage of 400 feet and lot depth of 660 feet and is presently vacant, and b The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residences on mirnmum 7,500 square foot lots, the property to the south consists of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp, the property to the east issingle-family residences on minrmum 1/2 acre lots, and the propertyto the west is vacant, and c The applicant has proposed to install fire spnnklers in the homes bequse the street length exceeds 600 feet, and there will be no secondary access until the adtoming vacant propertyto the west is developed, and 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 2 b The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envvonmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause senou~ public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict vnth any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines • promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibds, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition setforth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Enaineenna Deaartment 1) Stable Falis Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance vnih i City "Local Residential" standards, including, but not limited to, the follovnng J~ !1/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 3 a) Provide property line-adjacent sidewalk, street trees, and residential dnve approaches b) Protect existing curb, gutter, and asphalt pavement, or replace, as regwred c) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required Protect existing streetlights, or replace, as regwred d) Provide traffic stnping and signage, as regwred 2) Internal streets to be improved in accordance with the City "Local Residential" standards, including, but not limited to, the follovnng a) Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, properly line-adjacent sidewalk, street trees and dnve approaches, as regwred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide traffic stnping and signage, as required d) Provide curbside drain outlet for pnvate drainage fatality along north side of Lot 11 3) Developer shall make a good faith effort to obtain off site nghts-of--way for grading and drainage from the property to the west a) Obtain nght of entry to install pnvate drainage fatality off site, north of Lot 11, to be maintained by adtacent property owner, wdh penmeter wall placed on the property line If unsuccessful, said fatality shall be located on Lot 11 in a drainage easement in favor of the adtacent property The design of said faality shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer Provide a gate for maintenance access by owner of Lot 11 Inlet to curbside dram outlet shall be located in front yard of Lot 11, not outside penmeter fencing b) If adtacent property owner does not approve the off-site grading on the west side of Street C, an intenm retaining wall is acceptable on site 4) Revise existing public improvement plans to show new improvements vnthin the Stable Falls parkway and connections to the existing storm drain 5) Drainage from only one lot shall flow through only one other lot Cross- lot drainage, from Lot 2 across Lot 1, shall be contained in a concrete or rock-lined swale or 12-inch reinforced concrete pipe Provide a pnvate drainage easement on the map ~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 ' Page 4 6) Owners of Lots 14, 17, 25, and 26 shall maintain the proposed parkway and the planting area between the back of sidewalk and penmeterwall along the side yards Side yard walls shall not protect beyond the front of houses, so these areas are clearly visible to the homeowner 7) Penmeter block wall on north side of Lot 11 shall stop at building setback line 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 peroent from the top of the curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages ' Building & Safety Deaartment 1) The developer shall make a good fadh effort to obtain a drainage easement on the property adtacent to the north side of Lot 11 at the southwest comer of the protect if the developer demonstrates that he has exhausted all options to obtain this easement, the drainage ditch on this lot shall be finished with nver rock and a wntten response shall be provided to the prospective owner of Lot 11, that they are responsible for the maintenance of this drainage facility Environmental Mingahon Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permds, the developer shall submA construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment vmll be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follovwng provisions ~~s~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 5 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time ,. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance vnth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc orGean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stopping ~~ ~ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 ' Page 6 Cultural Resoun;es 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga vnll Enact intenm measures to protect un~lesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Gty to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follownng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the proled area Subrhit one copy of the completed report, vnth onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudion field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speufic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological momtonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found vmthin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardino County Museum ~oL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 • Page 7 Geology and Sorts 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assouated vnth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when vend speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions ' Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Roof runoff will be directed to vegetated swales in pnvate yards for partial cleansing before entenng the streets 2) Efficient imgation techniques will be detailed in prospective buyer disctosure packages 3) An educational packet volt be distnbuted to all homeowners upon final walk through to provide information on recyGing, pesticide and fertd¢er use and good house keeping practices 4) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building OffiGal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pernit Noise 1) Construct sound attenuation bamers along the south tract boundary per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Giroux and AssoGates, October 21, 2004) This sound bamer shall be constructed as early as possible dunng construction of this protect 2) Construct homes with special sound attenuating features per the • recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Gvoux and AssoGates, October 21, 2004) ~~ ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 8 3) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the budding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance moth the mitigation measures contained in the final report 4) The applicant shall submit certification from an coustical engineerthat all recommendations of the acoustlcal repo were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes ' 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 7) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Public Services 1) Residential fire sprinklers shall be installed on Lots 1 through 25 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 ~~ /T PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04126 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 9 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich MaGas, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary Mu I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-~nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS LJ ~~~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT16812 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the~bove-tasted protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law,to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelmes As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16812 • Page 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actiwties at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdrndual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. ~~ ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16812 Applicant: Ben Anderson (BCA Development) Initial Study Prepared by: Brent Le Count Date: Mav 11.2004 .. Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C - 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City - denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide - evidence that low-emission mobile construction - egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was - investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC ~ 2/4 . ~7 . +' . ~ -. .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO ~ C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Revew of plans C 2l4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters {~ 2of7 .. . . .. . . . . . ... .. . . -. .. All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources - ;~. ~~, ' v'=rtai+~„ ;~. ,.c,~; ~ ~, _ ",~r,,t ~ ~ ' = : x"' °='~ ~;`"•~ ~ 1 :. : { ~3:e., L`+~3.i ~Klk' ~ s :?~9i` ,'Ya7„'. 'w5a , , , ,Y.f±~°d'$aa..u ;..rs. , , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point _ • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AID 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving , ~ ~' i i ~ • ... .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .: : : . A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the " following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils - The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During . A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- sde Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes 4 of 7 ~. .. Chemical soli-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~ ~ r .i„ `~?~~.F .`'. Y ~ ;,. ;«-; ~~" i rw A: , "', a, "'I Roof runoff will be directed to vegetated swales in BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 private yards for partial cleansing before entering the streets Efficient irrigation techniques will be detailed m BO B/CID Revew of plans A/C 2l4 prospective buyer disclosure packages An educational packet will be distributed to all BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 homeowners upon final walk through to provide information on recycling, pesticide and fertilizer use and good house keeping practices Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Nonce of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Ehm~nation System (NPDES) General - - Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water - Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been i obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's I Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Construct sound attenuation barriers along the south BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 tract boundary per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (G~roux and Assocates, October 21, 2004) This sound barrier shall be constructed as early as possible during construction of this protect Construct homes with special sound attenuating CP/BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 features per the recommendations of the Noise Impact Study (Giroux and Associates, October 21, 2004) Oc' ~. ~7 . .. ... ~. ~. ~. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City CP/BO B Review of plans C 2/4 Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for " conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report The applicant shall submit certification from an BO D Review of study D 2/4 acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified rn Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwldmg Offiaal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 6of7 . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Public Services Residential fire sprinklers shall be Installed on Lots 1 FC B Plan review C 2l3 through 25 d0 '~ICey to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWclion B -Other Agency Permit /Approval ' 2 -Withhold Gredmg or Butlding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation ~7 •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS w PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16812 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 30 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS APPLICANT: BCA DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF 210 FREEWAY, EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTEMNT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall ogre agents, officers, or emp relingwsh such approv employees, for any Co employees maybe requ discretion, participate at shall not relieve applica 2 Approval of Tentative T DRC2004-00566 B. Time Limits e to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its Ioyees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to al The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or urt costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or fired by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation nt of his obligations under this condition ract No SUBTT16812 is granted subject to the approval of Variance This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expve, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first SC-1-04 1 Comolehon Data -~~~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~Z- ~5 Protect No SUBTT16812 Completion Date D. E. 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Diwsions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the d t th h ll b d i a e provi e o e copy s issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 The developer shall submit a construction access' plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice , regwrements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing Building Design 1 For all residential development, provide conduit from each uniUlot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street Provide interior structured wiring for each house/bulding with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval pnor to issuance of bulding permits La ndscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_!_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground coverfor erosion . control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 3 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _I_I_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition SC-1-04 ~Z~$6 Pro)ect No SUBTT16812 Comolehon Date 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineenng Diwsion F. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bulding & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4 Mitigation measures are regwred for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be . considered grounds for forfeit G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i e , SUBTT16812) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts SC-1-04 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ~ ~~ ~~ Proteot No SUBTT16812 Completion Dale 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division pnor to permd issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _I_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits I. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Bwlding Code, City Grading _I_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan / 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _I_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction pro/ects and for _I_I_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer . APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. De dication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans andlor tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 30 total feet on Stable Falls Avenue _/_/- 3 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 4 Prvate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_I_ noted on the final map 5 All existing easements Tying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_I_ final map SC-1-04 ~~-~ ~g Protect No SUBTT16812 Completion Date K. Street Improvements 1 All public Improvements (interior streets, drainagefacilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing mare than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a pereentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Treil Other Stable Falls Avenue X X X X 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along ma/or or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer -/-/- I I / I / / / I / / / / / / SC-1-04 ~i ~~ Protect No SU8TT16812 Completion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Ctty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Ctty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the tale page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engmeer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engmeer Mm Grow Streel Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Stze Qty Rodeo Dnve Pyrus calleryanna No wmmon name 3' 20' O C 15 Gal Fdl in 'Anstocraf Stable Falls Avenue Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20' O C 15 GaI Fill in Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Pnor to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient defiaencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way Retaining wall along 210 freewav / / -~-~- / J / / ~~ / / / / SC-1-04 ~.~ g o Protect No SUBTT16812 Comole6on Date L. Public Maintenance Areas r_1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of butldtng permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer M. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalihes shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage At7tering the property from adjacent areas N. Utilities L~ O. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way Cucamonga Vallev Water Distract. Caltrans Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwldmg permit issuance tf no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits rn the case of all other residential projects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agences involved Approval of the final parcel map wdl be subject to any requirements that may be receroed from them General Requirements and Approvals -/-~ -/-/- -/-/- _/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -~ /_ -/-/- -/-/- sC-~ -oa ~~ a ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 23, 2004 Tract 16812 SEC Stable falls Ave & Rodeo Dr SUBTT16812 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. Fire Sprinklers are required on the homes and garagesbuilt on lots 1-25 in accordance with the approved alternative method mitigated for a single point of access. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gn~delmes for Ftre Hydrants The following provides design gmdehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m single-family residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants aze 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Frre D~sfnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bu~ldmg FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project will be established m gallons per minute at a mmtmum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch based on the size of the structures This requirement ~s made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located wtthm a 500-foot radins of the proposed project maybe used to provide the requred fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans aze required for all projects that must extend the ex~stmg water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wrthrn 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes regwre approved Fire Distnct vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction ~-~ as FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have approved a request for an alternative method. The approved form must be reproduced on the architectural plans. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants wrtlun a 600-foot radms of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All requued public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fue Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 3 Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD is on file. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services if the current letter has expired PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker md~cating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkers" On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Public Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with mm~mum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be mtemally or externally illuminated dunng penods of dazkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, add~t~onal 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 4 Fire Sprinklers: The automatic fire sprinklers required on lot 1-25 must be installed suspected and accepted. ~~q 3 RESOLUTION NO 04-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO DRC2004-00566 TO INCREASE WALL HEIGHTS ABOVE 8 FEET FOR SOUND ATTENUATION PURPOSES ALONG THE 210 FREEWAY IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 210 FREEWAY WESTBOUND OFF RAMP AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND THE WEST SIDE OF STABLE FALLS AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-161-19, 32, 33, AND 34 A Rentals 1 BCA Development, Inc filed an application for the issuance of Vanance No DRC2004-00566, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Vanance request is referted to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurted B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwilh public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located north of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue, with an approximate street frontage of 400 feet and lot depth of 660 feet and is presently vacant, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is single-family residences on minimum 7,500 square foot lots, the property to the south consists of the 210 Freeway westbound off ramp, the property to the east issingle-family residences on minimum 112 acre lots, and the property to the west is vacant, and c The applicant has requested flexibility with the required wall height m order to construct sound attenuation walls to reduce traffic noise m compliance with City standards Vanances for similar wall heights were granted previously for surrounding tracts, and d The protect site is unusual because it is located adtacent to a freeway, and e Without the Vanance, the protect would be depnved of pnvileges entoyed by other owners within the same distnct to develop single-family residences, and to construct sound attenuation walls necessary to protect said hom~e.(s_f(r~o, m exLce~ssive traffic noise levels The proposed { ' `l~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-127 DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 2 wall heights are consistent with those on surrounding properties for which the Planning Commission has granted vanances or that were constructed as part of the freeway, and f Because the location of the site adjacent to a freeway is unique, the proposed project wdl be in the sport of other vanances that have been approved m the general area, and g Granting of the Vanance wall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be matenally mtunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity On the contrary, granting of the vanance wdl reduce noise levels to levels con~stent with City standards, hence, prevent exposure of residents to excessive noisedevels 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific,findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would not result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code LJ b That there are exceptional or extraordinary urcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same distnct c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvdeges entoyed by the owners of other properties m the same distnd d That the granting of the Vanance wall not constitute a grant of speaal pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified m the same distnct e That the granting of the Vanance wdl not be detnmental to the public heath, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and detennines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Gwdelmes 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) The wall shall be constructed to match the matenals, colors, and design of the adjoining freeway sound attenuation walls 2) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or `~~~ `~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-127 DRC2004-00566 - BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC December 8, 2004 Page 3 employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition ~, 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chamnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannmg Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~'~i ~ 1 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE December 8, 2004 ~/ TO• Chairman and Members of the Planrnng Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner ~~ SUBJECT• HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS & CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS - A request to develop a 2-story single-family residence with a total floor area of about 7,500 square feet (footprint approximately 3,900 square feet) on a 20,300 square foot parcel that includes excavation in excess of 5 feet (the maximum permissible in the Hillside Overlay) in the Very Low Residential Dlstnct ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 10946 Carnage Dnve - • APN 1074-561-25 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) (Class 3 Exemption - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). BACKGROUND The proposed single-family residence is located in the Very Low Residential Distnct and is included in the Hillside and Equestrian Overlay Districts Development proposed in the Hillside Overlay is subject to the Hillside Development Regulations, Section 17 24 of the Development Code The intent of these regulations is to minimize grading and ensure that the house's form, mass, profile, and architectural features are designed to blend with the natural terrain, preserve the character and profile of the slope, and give consideration to the lot size and configuration Typically, the Hillside Design Review applications are reviewed and approved by the City Planner However, because the protect includes excavation equal to or exceeding 5 feet in vertical depth, the application requires the review and approval by the Planning Commission ANALYSIS A General The protect site is located on the north side of Carriage Dnve on a parcel of 20,300 square feet The existing topography slopes from about 2,234 feet on the north (rear) side of the lot to about 2,212 feet on the south (front) side The applicant is proposing to construct a 2-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage The first floor of the house will have three stepped pads with finished floor elevations of 2,222 feet, 2,220 feet, and 2,218 feet (moving from the rear to the front) The garage will be located partially below the first floor and will have a finished surface elevation of 2,211 feet (Exhibits "D" and "F") The depth of excavation, or "cut" that will be required to ITEM "J" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS December 8, 2004 Page 2 construct this "tuck-under" garage will vary between 4.5 feet at its front to 10 feet at its rear. As seen from the outside, the east elevation and the surrounding slope will generally nse to about the midpoint of the garage and then °level" off at 2,216 feet. Because of this, the depth of cut at the rear of the garage will not be apparent (Exhibit "E"). The remainder of the proposed house will comply with the Hillsifl6 Development Regulations which includes limiting maximum depths of excavations and fills to 5 feet high or less for features such as a patio and planter area, and limiting the height of the retaining walls to 4 feet high or less Furthermore, the proposed home will be within the bwlding envelope as described in the regulations, and its height will be 30 feet or less as measured from the finished grade. The lot coverage will be significantly less than 25 percent, the maximum permissible in the Very Low Residential Distnct. B. Grading and Desgn Review: Both the Grading and Design Revew Committees recommended approval of the protect as submitted at their meetings on October 19, 2004. C Environmental Review: The protect is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Enwronmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2003-01071 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Standard Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Bra City Planner BB MS\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit °D° Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit °G° Draft Resol - Information Sheet -Hillside Design Review - Protect Site Map -Site Plan -Grading Plan - Elevations -Floor Plan - Roof Plan ution of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2003-01071 i ~-- a INFORMATION SHEET HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW L FILE NO PROJECT NAME APPLICANT LOCATION FLOOR AREA . LOT COVERAGE SITE SIZE: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING ZONING EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE ZONING Hillside Design Review DRC2003-01071 Single-faintly residence Andrews and Chapman Architects for Tito/Alicia Ortiz Lot 101, Carriage Dnve, APN 1074-561-25 7,508 square feet (2 stones, including patios, decks, and garage) 3,932 square feet (19°/P) including roof overhangs 20,300 square feet (0 47 acre) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Vacant ' Residential North Very Low (VL) Residential (1-2 du/acre) South Very Low (VL) Residential (1-2 du/acre) East: Very Low (VL) Residential (1-2 du/acre) West Very Low (VL) Residential (1-2 dulacre) LAND USE single-faintly residence (Related file DRCDR 98-34) vacant, single-family residence under construction (Related file DRC2003-00932) vacant, Htllside Design Review pending (Related file DRC2003-01070) vacant, single-faintly residence under construction (Related file DRC2004-00029) EXHIBIT `A' ~ 3 •. ~.~• umru l.t ~ .g~~. ~.~.~.~.~>r314'$IIlL~7~.`~J .~ ~.\ •~.~ i ~, • ~ AIM-OND ST ~inrut. ~ ~ " D Y~y- {~ y _w~w~Paw • d -s yrAOwav g~v~ LL C ,~ ~~/ a \ _~EN_ ~ ~°°' ~'~~ 8 \`~ ---~~ ~ ` \' PROJECT SITE cAmwc sr ~ cwAN~ n f a k X~~~R~ ~ RN` ulwn~ SSS ~R ' >~- ~ n VISUOROVE~S~rW 5 f °R~"~ a ~~j~vf~q `_ R~ ~OOIIaGIN wG NJC" ' ~ Q®~`~ N ~ q~^"~"' d s• ~RD vNlEnwsr k±c.w~R~~~d ~ ~ a ~ a`~ ~. RYMYVEW YYY P ~ 5pp d 3 ,o NILISIDE RD > Y HILLSI ERD 6 ~~ ~, ~~ r ~ y„ gyp{ w ~' w+c+nn ~Im~au<i1~EM 6 I ~ aswn_crlW rreoimffm ~' Eg i Rf aer w tau P ~Q I 31 I q Z _ i ~f I IWILAONAVE .k raauvn > WILSON AVE L'r I t e~nuwrt ! . [~ I S I I ~HERMOSA '-,--- ~i ~~ I ~ EI ' •w~~nom!/i k rvawM <~ #3 4 r wmHO~ av °" o~ ~ , ~ 3 I ~ _ w oEms um~m mi++n°T R ~ q .WM s YVPIMI~q_ W,W/MA ~~Ra MltlEl}Ybl~ ' ~ ~~ c~ cT tl rcAs y' unaw q, _ .y .c ~~ ~ zai WP rt cousr S { . n.."""ic+w NNU t1 y a i tt~ °'G "'n ~ BANYAN ST % r • SIeUw~j51~ Y i ~ C wF~ ~ ~~--' lu '®^. gYI s ~ ~I I uaaul I f Irnu..cr ggE~-Y4'g3 G L M ~~ i '°"m~n yl~ ~~~5 d ~RYN nA ~5~~'[F} p G Y G gg r r _i gip' ~, s/n'.~m Imx ~, ar~rart~R~ ~ ~ ' ~~' :"~~:, .Awl 7~ Y;±~...g/~ ..~_ ~~v n n s~-=~ n rt l sA~ru[n ~ I .e' n v wyuc ~ --~ t _ _ _ -~-_ tia`n e. :.a ~i ~ m.. t I t VINEYARD ~ y~ ~ _ ~~ ~~~ n"`°""."~'-"-^.. .•..~.n Iw ~~~a~~ !--`, ~~ I ~ a t k (., 4°Fa _t..+,.n " ~~ 4u. ~.,:_ r e"u~o~_- I ~.. 'inEn ~ ; ~ • 'P a '°'.' a w"' (ro •HIGHLMIGAYE:::Y--___. __ _.t pctCD AYE .. ... ..... .. ...Y ____ _. ._}._..~ .. ...._ ___ .. _: ... ... ~ n v. , camvuw ~ • i ~ ~rvd'_w fl t f ~ V,,. ti ~ ~ ~ I3 r ~ao sa'• S<" .... A~~ c I r Cc I r ~ ><' 8Ntlm /t AwAarrarw ur yy aa c~ c i~ ~~o I~'/ .}y~:+,;n ~ - „'~+c'~'J[--p KEVY varR 'fir F ~ S~ ! $~ ~_'"~ ~ / cl w.~`s-`-` .,~~~~E?!I ~Wi ~~~t di ~~~,n ~ y~I, ~`€I~, ~ .,~. ~~~.1E ..~ ! ~ ~ a wu k~e AvE ~ ~ I - a~"-' '~ ab ~ ~ ~ , Pet t I °ym~+. w n ~ ~ rt ~ xou. t~ n~ ~" '~ ~' ~~ }}pp^^ t au ~'-~~'f`! 4~I[ ~ e \~5~ ~ ~ WCA , ~E{~ VILTORIA~f Si t s ~'-~ `- i0 ~n ESr. $'P! ~.V/~•\:5 r YC~ e 3K t°° mho- u~ y ~ I wash6666 ~ ~ v E ~~"~°~~r \ `~ix •'I ~ c a_ _ e n n ~ ~I ~ ~I ~ f .aom r a ~ "TM' euwut ~~F~ I~ b `~ I c ~, ram I ~ g ~ ~ ~ E~~ f ° r/-~ •'' ~.,,.,a• _ r ~.'S.I~E .3w~ ,~'y~ F` ~~I . ii i s autwn I~ ~ g ~7 _ I uvilcrt I; s- unsn ~ 1. c ~ ° ~° ~ I ' ! ~ ;' 3 4 t " H ~ i ~aa avo... E ~ rw.iow cww _,O'I Iq+~m H w~! Y Ld = 4~e.uy'T ' uv_a6 t !~ .,~i~, / a ~ Q_~~~I ~ ~wTm . S .J~ } 'y}f ./ I IS_4 r 4'm~~ ( mm. i i I aJ ~~ i ~n I~ ~a 9F I I ~~~_ 9}Fll n VgO1 ~~~UB • ~ I >-^-^-L_ I namoaort~ f.. ~I t aeuaa t a_~s ~~ ~ ~S a ' i .~a,n~i...~9c t~ ~~ ~~ n F ° ~ ~ Ar/ ~ ~ r r~ `~a~~ ~ DONNA Ivi'es' •r~-41'v' a ¢-r' F I.n.mon ~`i°1°-°'t ~, I lin --g MEREED ~ a ~m~_~ I ~ .wu^" T __ J' / • t ~w~.-,-$ 3' vALO am sr i `n,wrt _ vun rosy '3 `r ~ (€ 6 P P "+o, '{` ~g • ~' ,o°° ~ pR BAISAST ~~ 3 wMn ' ~~--~- 1~.f ~ ~ ~^r~~Y~ A ' ~ ~ ~ww, Y ~~~ ~ 1p4~ 05~ @€¢ QG g} ron' / ,{ ° ~1~~ fir, / ~ n.~.e M^57~--~~---~~ .ww°o"wmmfpp~0.0.I ~vb ~ 8 3 ~ti~ 34~a w MUSSER t ,.~..ea°f ~ ~,arg~['r F"} \~ ~~AGw'~°¢ ~wu~y,n ~ wmlwn I i , SP ~ ~~~ @ t _ 9~° n ~• `S" L AVE l P r, E !r' ~~.-__ ~~ _ a S 3~ ~~ca~n / ;Y`° E EN 10 x3smn_ wwol m t .q 4a $~ t v~ Al ~.'` r tky - ~n ~~ w e •VMCA yQ 1~~ ~_, EXHIBIT ~B~ ;~$~n - ~9 ., m _ _m_ _ - ~=_._~, "°-~`_ ~ TERRAVISTA~~`#'-- ---`` I ~~~ ° TOWN CENTER RANCHO ~ ~,« 1 ~ i ~ SAN 1lf~ONl(1 I r ~ . Y_~ ' ~I~I;li1111111 ~~If' A ~ ~ ~ g~g``; ~sgn yiy 33 'r'r' I R~® ~~a~~ ~9R~~~ ~ 91~111~1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i;i~iji s~t1 ~~ r y~ Qg~7gg h .,A~. ~ Y a __...y, t s ~+_. ~ e a., `i t~~ v a..a '~ a~~g~~g ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ., :M .i ~~~g~ ~~~~ s x it ~} N EXHIBIT `C' . ~"_~ EXN ou~e n raxa~rana oxaN.a as aoarcan aw ~m am -~' d0 ALO .sfcomn NOL9AI0 ONINa8t60N8 YONO/1YJ[L~ OILONY9 _ B d ~ S pe @ ~ ] ? p 1 R E @ ~ ~ C 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ i W a ,a vev.p leeee~ivl ee v ~!~ ~~ ~~ . A l~lJ~~~ „v~,i E ____i A Qp ~~! p - ~, -~~ # M'• iZh L9 N 6t y~ ~d f -y" . , ~uva groia,r,s~n ~ -- M~,69,Zf19 N ~ I ~~,Na l 6 l l v 9 st 1 rl -~ ~ ;' J .~~ .Y / / / / ~ / / / /q~ ~ / $a~,a e / pp i s~l ./ . ~ ~ / i ~ ~ ~ ,e i -- ~ -- // / / / - -/ 'y . ~ ~ ice ice ~/ - /'~ m ~ o _~~ / i ~ q'i ~ s~ . ~ _ ___ i -C i - i I • - e s ~ __ / - ~~ b~ ~ p ~ ONR13yp-.C1111vd i i e'fONi6 ANOaS-911A ®60d6Nd ~ -~ e.~ p y ., e / ~~ / _ i ,y ~ i .e ~p~/1~ - / u ~.u s- ~ ~ i Y ~ ~ ' a //'~-~ r- '~A ~ //te / j L n ' / '' v~. v `` ~ ~~ -~- __ ~ N / ~ ~ ` / • ' - ~ / ~/ / '~ d rY .a ~ l .9599 0 / _ y :_ '~______ ~ __ __ ~ _ _\ _ _ Z s ~ v ~ pU ~ ~ ~ 00 i _ 10001 ~_O _. ___~_ t0 ____~_~ M rv-1 U 1 O ,19,9599N U Q - ~p(2,CzE~~e ~(ttvE --- IRIT `D' S~ `_~ 9uu n •axo~xu oxaxre na 9orreena am ~o~ im -~ 19Y_ [oorA NO®dIU ~Illi323tII,JN3 Y'JII011~'~ll~ OHJNYN d0 AtU 6 v e ,y en~u° q gi~ s( Q~ A~ a~ie: °~;( 'Q g g$i ~~ Q i u s~ ~ q~Q~@( e+ F ~ 8Q Ar gi~AAA - ~3:~ ~~ ~~ "a ~ 9~g ~~Qa pQ~ ~ lpe~ e1 A i ° ~ ~ p° 51°gQg°a A # Cd~Fi A° 1 Q!+ ( i ~ ~EA [ pepQ~C ~a Q aai 7 A~ a e (A i i ~i ~ t~iE~ g9 1 A'1 ~~ Q~~•~~ F, 1{. (i IA t t~d Q~ ~' Q~ Q(~i88~ 9°d~~ i e aa~ ( A e ! (a .(v ° .idQ i A~ ~ gd 6~~A 1~ (!i ~ i ~ (J S ,adi 7{;9~ A eA ~~ 1Q i¢¢, A, s~ IA I a ~°e A~ A ~ 1 (Q 8 s~A:> ~~ ~ s~~i i :Q ~~ ( QSi ( A ~ ('i•d q[ a 7d }@i ~A ~ g~ 5g8 a~A A i AA (~J ~g ji ~Q ~ ~` E ~ •+i t~ j b , as (~ i( QA1 ;: Aiv~B e6~~i ~a a S~ 9 ~ :B4° e ~ ° ;~ q ~ E i~~~8 e Ayg oA~F i9 ~Qi~iQ i. )iti j ; { ''+ 1 )~t~ el ° t. a dA a lice s 3 ~Q A gg d A s ~ d~ A a' i~ 9 ~E( Al16QQ ~ ~ffli ( al ! ti('{ ~~ ~~ ~ eS g6' ~~ ° ~~ ~~~~~ Q~}(p aj g~j~ ~ ~9 ~ A ~ d ~: A °f i ~~ f' ~A , f g~ i}APR`( ! (1,A ] t { A R ,. r gRe `i i~,Rs (^~.~ i Agc ~ v~Re Y ' eF ( i '( 1 ((d.pp° C~ A~ . 1 Qe P(a ~i tQt' ~ ~ ~ ~ i a ~~slf ~~ R ~ 4 dpp i~ ~ ~9 N ~ aiiiiiiAi i Rv' ~y A pp Q °Q~49 ~ g9 ~~ ~ .A9pa~t8g ~.!! ,1 ~~ ~ { vj d R ~{ R6 d~a ~°i~ ~'~ 5 RA~ ( '49 R A! dY A Ai , 9 As i ~d Q7 ` QA~A.fi ~ `iF, 1 1) ( I• ~~~1 e u. A 6 Ae ° e j( v ~~ Q~R ~gJp ~~ R 3 ' ggtg~i :°~~~'g8ii R ~~.. 64 ~~~~ ~gg ~ : ~i ~g' ~ a°g R'~I~. ~~ ~~ ~a~~ ~~ ~i ~g;~q: i~# ial((fij ~~ :-! •(.•{,+#~ 6~~:E ~~3 ~~~ v~$ ~~ ~886~8 ~~~:~ ~i! ~~ ~~=~ ~6 ~iai ~E ~ i 4d d@ R :8 ~ iel9i 64 RR ~~~€ 4: Ai{~&i! ~ei'.i~! j'.I ~: {1} ~f l~1li .. . _ 3 a S _ ! e t tl 1 .,n ,. l I I I''• I I~~ ;l i; e e .~. ~ I' I. I `,, I I ,~ a _. I ~ -~---- 7t ~ ~________ i i X '~^v~ i W YI i ~~ i i i ~ ve m ~ 9 ~ ~. s ~ Y s_ ~ I I I. I I I I '~, I 1 ~ o ......--i 1 1 z` 1 1 ~ ' '^---' a. 1 ° ~~ ._9 1' ~y o ' ~.. ~. , y ~ ~ 111 ~... -------'-'~ y ~ 1 g Tm BA ~~ ~ i C i A ---- ~~ ' :A A + ______ w _ 1 ~~ 1 ~° a1 B 1 ~ ~ ~ O' 1 z e y9' I +~ F - O ~ ~ejt 1 L W~ 1 U i~O~I ~ l` ~ i \ \ i ,~__ \ i `_ _ ~ >m ~ .e. i >.n .>a i ~ i ~, I I I I ~ ~ ( ..,.~°>m ,.e a °.>°>m° ~ ,i1111;1;1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1"N ~ 6 tl~lilll I I I I I I i ~ ~~~ 1 11 & ~I~I~I~I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,1..1, ~ 9 fl~ ~~ s ~~ a66ai~~~~~~~~I~€ ~oooooooao®o 00 0 ~~ ~I ~' EXHIBIT `E' ~ g € ~~ ~~ 0 0 0 o a'~ 1 3 a z 0 >a W w z 0 6 r 3 '~ _~_ --- ~_I i ~T~ i~ it ~`1 i Q ~ Y gi ~J ~ ~8, ~. I ~ - ~ - r~ _ T ' iL- _I -- ~ S ~ ~ ~~= ' ~ I ~~ ' - k Q v_ _ w -+ --T. -T. J ' 1 i ~, 0 t __ __ __ __ i- I '--------- -- 3'~ ~b3Z.!b60EI~01 ~~~~•~i{~l19~~ii~ i:~o_ ~ao~a~~o goo i ' ~ ~ i!~~ ~', ry ~ r at ~~ r- s r ,~ _ _ ~ ' ~~ ` L ; ~~ ~ 1 .r --- -. - ~ -: ,- rrtr~ t t ~ ti a~ ~ ~ ~9 ;~ t ~~ 29b6-9b£ C£2) H~ki FRi4lddViJ+51'C~VH~WO~ 02~0i , b002-b-l1aJ ~~ 1~19i;iiiiiii SIN Q Efffigy ~iji~t _~E~ ~t i E 1~idi~i ~ i i i i i t.r..~. 69..E ~~~~ s ~ „, , I ~ /Ia r i Q 3 1 F ~ R ~ ~~i~ ~ 6a$A O 3 3: I .~ ~ti'e=A3 A ~ ~ ~ $~a i D ~ ~ a ~P s a ~k~.^ ~~ a ~ a a ~~ O b g a~ Qgq kbL e.° !eb 4 4 ~ ~O8 Abe O _ O F ~~. ~§~ EXHIBIT `F' -~o li~41;~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~rN N ' i'l ~liilili l i i i i i ~,c fl 1 I E • $IE ~„ ~,, y$~ ~J ~ ~, ~I~Ijl~1111111 ~,.~, s f y!Pi Q E~IiE I I ,iyi ~ ~ € ~I~I~I~IIIIIII ~~I„1, `~ S z g 0 0 EXHIBIT `G' ~-~a RESOLUTION NO 04-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-01071, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 2-STORY SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 7,500 SQUARE FEET (FOOTPRINT APPROXIMATELY 3,900 SQUARE FEET), ON A PARCEL OF 20,300 SQUARE FEET THAT INCLUDES EXCAVATION IN EXCESS OF 5 FEET (THE MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE IN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY), IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (01-2 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE), LOCATEDAT 10946 CARRIAGE DRIVE, ANDMAtCING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 1074-561-25 A Recitals 1 Andrews & Chapman Architects, on behalf of Tito and Alicia Ortiz, filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2003-01071 as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subbed Hillside Design Review is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of December 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on December 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property in the Very Low (VL) Residential Distnd located at the north side of 10946 Carnage Dnve -APN 1074561-25, and b The subbed property has an area of 20,300 square feet with a streetfrontage of 100 feet and lot depth of about 196 feet, and c The subbed property slopes from north to south with an elevation of 2,234 feet on the north (rear) side and an elevation of 2,212 feet on the south (front) side; and d The applicant proposes to construct a2-story single-famiy residerice of about 7,500 square feet with a lot coverage of 19 percent, and e The proposed residence will have a first floorwith three stepped pads with finished floor elevations of 2,222 feet, 2,220 feet, and 2,218 feet, moving from the north (rear) to the south (front), and ~-- ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04128 DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS December 8, 2004 Page 2 f The proposed residence includes a'tuck-under" 4-car garage that will be located partially under the first floor of the house and will have a finished surface elevation of 2,211 feet The depth of excavation required m order to do this vanes from 4 5 feet at the front of the garage to 10 feet at the rear of the garage, and g. Excavations on the remainder of the property will be limited to 5 feet or less, and the quantity of excavation will be 947 cubic yards with minimum fill, and h. The property to the east is vacant with a smg~¢-family residence currently under review by the City, on the properties to the squ)h 'and west there are single-family residences currently under construction, and on the ,property to the north there is an existing single-family residence, and The site is vacant and contams• ho vegetation other than native grasses, and j The proposed residence is consistent Huth other single-family residential developments m the area, and k The proposed residence meets 'the intent and gwdelines of the Hillside Development Regulations 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows The proposed project is consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is m accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~unous to properties or improvements m the wGmty 4 The Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified m this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualdyAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department . 1) Approval is for the construction of a 2-story, single-family residence of 7,508 square feet, located on the north side of 10946 Carnage Drive ~"~`L PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04128 DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS December 8, 2004 Page 3 2) The applicant shall obtain a wntten approval of the proposal from the Haven View Estates Homeowners' Association This document shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of Precse Grading and Building Permits 3) Architectural details, finishes, tnm, matenals, and color shall be undone m appearance and design, and shall be applied on all elevations of the house I 4) If a new perimeter wall or fence'is proposed on the west and east sides of the sub/ect property, a good faith effort shall be made to coordinate the design and construction of this wall with the property owners to the west and east to ensure that any grade differences are mmim¢ed and that there are no "double-wall" conditions. Although separate, approved bwlding permits are regwred pnorto construction of thiswall, its location shall be shown m its entirety and wdh dimensions and elevations (top/bottom of wall) on the PreGSe Grading Plan 5) A minimum horizontal distance of 3 feet (inside dimension) shall be provided between all retaining walls and include appropnate landscaping between them All walls shall have a decorative finish and a 2-inch decorative Gap The maximum allowable height of any retaining wall is 4 feet, measured from finished grade Although separate, approved budding permits are required pnorto construcbon of these walls, their location shall be shown on the PreGSe Grading Plan 6) A decorative gate shall be provided along the north perimeter wall/fence to provide maintenance and horse access to the equestrian ~ trail The location of this gate shall be shown on the PreGSe Grading Plan. 7) Vertical cuUfill shall not exceed 5 feet in depth anywhere on the property, as measured from the natural grade, except at the "tudc- under" garage as identified m the Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections. 8) Detailed landscape and imgation plans shall be submitted at the time of plan check to the Planning Department for review and approval A minimum of 30 percent of the landscape material shall be large size (minimum 24-inch box size trees, 10-gallon shrubs) within the front yard and visible portions of the side yard m order to create a mature appearance The detailed landscape and imgation plans must be approved by the Gty Planner pnorto the issuance of budding permits 9) Front yard landscaping shall be installed pnorto release of occupancy 10) Sloped banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height vnth 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at a minimum, imgated and landscaped with appropnate ground cover for erosion control In ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04128 DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS December 8, 2004 Page 4 addition, meandenng and varying slopes shall be created to eliminate unstable or unnatural appeanng conditions 11) Any revisions to the Grading Plan, including changes in the quantities or depth of cuUfill, will regwre the review and approval by the Grading Review Committee and Planning Commission Enoineenng Department ,., 1) Install dnve approach, curbside drains, and street trees per The City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Drawings, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer ' a) The removal of the existing' dnve approach and its replacement with curb and gutter shall be done in conformance with the City's standard Drawing, No 104, type A2-8 The new dnveway approach shall be done according to Drawing No 101, type R-1 b) Street trees shall be per the attached Street Tree Requirement Form c) Pnvate concrete walkway location shall allow for as many street trees as possible d) The parkway, from the nght-of-way to the top of curb, shall slope downward ~nnth a 2 percent cross slope e) Rewse existing street improvement plans, Drawing No. 1289, as regwred by the City Engineer f) Pnor to any work being performed in the public nght-of--way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office, in addition to any other pertmts required 2) Protect in place and/or repair existing improvements within the public nght-of-way 3) Pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits, form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Single-family residential projects are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program 4) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04128 DRC2003-01071 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS December 8, 2004 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ~, Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 2004, by the following vote-to-~nnt AYES- COMMISSIONERS +~ NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS L_~ ~~ 1 F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01071 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW ~~ APPLICANT: ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS LOCATION: 10946 CARRIAGE DRIVE - APN: 1074-561-25 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: a B. C. General Requirements com ~e~~o~ 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _J~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relrngwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2. Copies of the signed Plamm~g Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-128, Standard ~~_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actnrities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved ~~_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained to accordance with the approved plans which include ~_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, Iandscapmg, sign program, and grading on fiie in the Plamm~g Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations SC-11-04 7 tg Protect No DRC2003-01071 Comolefton Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Cade and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, owapproved use has commenced, whichever comes first r 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units Hnth _I_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a,clear and conase manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad/oining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 10 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fenang for permanence, durability, and design consistency 11 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 12 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/ 13 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers maybe manufactured _/ / products. D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ pro/ections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturailyiritegrated with the bwidrng design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street _/_/_ SC-1-04 -I Protect No DRC2003-01071 Comole6on Date F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting shall be prepared by a licensed _/_/_ landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but Tess than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size slope banks round cover In addition ro riate l rea and a h 100 ft f , g , pp p sq o s ope a shrub per eac in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or gtmater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Dmsion to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development /_/_ Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/~ the regwred Landscape plans and shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems requved to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/ /_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/ /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/~ a Site/Plot Plan, SC-1-04 3 ~~U Protect No DRC2003-01077 Comole6on Date b Foundation Plan, . c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterand waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i a ,DRC2003-01071) clearly ident~igd on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-01071) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in • effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for avadabdityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limded to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division pnor to perrrtit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures Provide compliance,with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califoma Building Code for regwred occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions K. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shalt be in accordance with Califoma Bwldng Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC-1.04 4 ~~\ Protect No DRC2003-01071 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work ' 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17 24 070 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for ail new construction protects and far existing buildings where improvements being proposetl will gener to 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepafed, stam~i~d, and signed by a California registered Crvd Engineer ' ' "+"~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Street Improvements All public improvements (intenor streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Carnage Dnve (e) X X (f) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this dem (e) Replace curb and outter at removed drive aooroach (fl Curbside drain outlets 3. Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer SC-1-04 5 ~- ~ Comolehon Date _/_/~ / / I I / I / I / I -/-/~ / / / / 1 I Protect No DRC2003-01071 Comole6on Date d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer ~~~„, f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detqurs during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be'provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer ~ ~ Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Carnage Drive Brachychiton Austrailian Flame Tree 5' 30' O C 15 gal fill in acenfo6us Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only M. Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary SC-1-04 -~-~ -~-~- _/ -~-~- _/ / _~ ~- _/ / -~ ~- `~ a3 Project No DRC2003-01071 Completion Date N. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Security Lighting ~~ ~,; 1 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/-/_ P. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/ ~_ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors Ifwindows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_!_ Q. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner R. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/ /_ wstbildy S. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and /_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system wtll reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/ /_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 S7a~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS DRC2003-01071 November 18, 2003 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. ., ~rJ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD C(hNDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS FSC-1 Prior to building permit issuance complete the following: t. The required fire flow for this project is 2250,gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended. Contact CVWD for a fire flow test. Please allow 30 working days for test results. Submit the fire flow letter from CVWD to FCS (909)477-2713 2. Illustrate the location of the closest fire hydrants to the property on the site plan to be submitted. FSC- 2 Pnor to occupancy final or final complete the following• 1 New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Page 1 of 1