Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004/01/14 - Agenda Packet
JANUARY 14, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A enda 2-7 A Develo ment Review DRC2003-00965 8 - 67 B Vacation of Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map 68 - 72 No 13692 V-192 -Crestwood Cor oration C, K, L Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract Map 73 - 194 S U BTT 16554 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-00358 Minor Exce tion DRC2003-00726 D, E, M Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract Map 195 - 318 S U BTT 16542 Variance DRC2003-00604 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-00602 F Tentative Tract Ma SUBTPM16365 319 - 337 G, H, I Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract Map 338 - 459 SUBTT16445 Environmental Assessment & Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 Variance DRC2003-01012 J Tentative Parcel Ma SUBTPM16180 460 - 481 N Environmental Assessment & Development Review 482 - 555 DRC2003-00324 O Develo ment Review DRC2003-00782 556 - 578 P Consideration of Appeal of Environmental Assessment & 579 - 598 Develo ment Review DRC2002-00116 • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO cUCAMONGA JANUARY 14, 2004 - 7:00 PM Cucamonga County Water District Board Room 10440 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Macias Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 10, 2004 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be rouLne and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for discussion A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00965 -MANNING HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 23 single- family homes on 13 6 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue - APN 1061-571-04, O8, 09, 21, and 22 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430, Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00575, Mills Act Application DRC2003-00576, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 On August 13, 2003, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~~HO JANUARY 14, 2004 CUCAMONGAZ On August 13, 2003, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negatwe Declaration B VACATION OF IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP NO 13692 (V-192) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION -Located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-34 Related file Tract Map SUBTT16237 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned ind~wduals may voce their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address AlI such opinions shall be l~mrted to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A residential subdivision of 6single-family lots on 1 68 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00358, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16542 - J T STORM - A request to subdwide 4 92 acres into 11 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue -APN 0227-071-24 Related Ftles Development Review DRC2003-00602, Variance DRC2003-00604, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00603 Staff has prepared a Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E VARIANCE DRC2003-00604 - J T STORM - A request for a Variance for wall height on the east and south sides of the property, totaling 13 feet in height in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue -APN 0227-071-24 Related Files Tentatwe Tract Map SUBTT16542, Development Review DRC2003-00602, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00603 • • • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~~HO JANUARY 14, 2004 CviceuoNCn g F TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC - A request to subdivide 11 84 acres into 5 parcels plus public right- of-way dedication for a retail shopping center consisting of multiple pads, including adrive-through lane, and anchortenants totaling 112,000 square feet of bwlding area in the Regional Related Office/Commeraal and Mixed Use Distracts of the Victoria Community Plan at the northwest corner of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards -APN 0227-201-39 and 44 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00617 and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00246 Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN 0227-171-06 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, Variance DRC2003-01012, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES -The development of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN 0227-171-06 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445, Variance DRC2003-01012, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration I VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to allow up to a 10 7 foot high combination wall along the south property boundary and 8 foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet, for the development of 23single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN 0227-171-06 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA i JANUARY 14, 2004 ~~Ha Cucnt~oNCn q J TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16180- L D KING, INC -Arequest to subdivide 3 37 acres into 4 lots in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 Dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Banyan Street and Greenwood Place - APN 0225-171-23 and 26 Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308 This project is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions) VI. NEW BUSINESS K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of bwiding elevations and detailed site plan for 6 single- familylots on 1 68 acre of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Base Line Road -APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration L MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2003-00726 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -Arequest to allow an 8-foot high wall for sound attenuation purposes along the northern and eastern boundaries of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, and to allow up to a 7-foot high wall by adding 1 foot to an existing wall along the southern boundary of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 for privacy purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted for a residential subdivision of 6single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, Development Review DRC2003-00358, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 M ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM -Arequest to develop 11 single-family homes on 3 93 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue -APN 0227-071-24 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542, Variance DRC2003-00604, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00603 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C CJ n U - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 14, 2004 R~~HO Cuc~oNCn 5 N ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00324 -DRS GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS - A request to construct a 13,855 square foot office and retail bwldmg on 1 70 acre of land in the Neighborhood Commeraal District, located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road -APN 1076-191-10 Related File Preliminary Review DRC2002-00337 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration O DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00782 - HK CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct a 5,928 square foot single-family home on 55 acre of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on Lot 8 of Tract 12650-1 at the westerly terminus of Deer Canyon Drive -APN 1074-331-10 This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - Infill Development) P CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 -EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - An appeal of a Design Review Committee decision denying a request to change an exterior bwldmg material for a 25,622 square foot warehouse on 1 25 acre of land in the Industrial District (Subarea 13), located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-283-02 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time lfitems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00504 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ~NCHO JANUARY 14, 2004 CUCAMONGA 6 1, Gatl Sanchez, Planning Commtsston Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 8, 2004, at least 72 hours pnorto the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic CenterDnve, Rancho Cucamonga and at 10440Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga ~/~~M7c/~*. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing unpaved u r1 LJ C~ • Vicinity Map Planning Commission January 14, 2004 o SPHERE O F I N F L U E N C E c ~ _ _ .~ _ ~ v _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 ~ -[ - y, - -a -2 -oW0`-~ ~ I HILLSIDE W . W' a~ ~ ~ ~VVILSON ~ = W y cQi~J- ~ --~----~-- U ~~ ~ i 1 O v _ i i i BANYAN i ~ >~ a ! ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ cl J ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~~ ~r~- """~ ,_ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ B -' ABASE LINE D, E, M ~- -'- - - ''- - -- F -~ , - ~ ~ - ; ~ ~~ ~ - --a--- FOOTHILL - it -~-~ ~ ~ ARROW -- -I-W- ~ L___ I = Q ~ Q ~ Q W O , vp p _ y ~_ _~ O W _ _ Z ' ~ ~ ~ ~- -U- - ~--~~- J- ~ Q C7 2 Q = =I ~i ® 4 ~ W W - - ~ 4TH S P Meeting Location Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct Offices 10440 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 * City Hall N City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 T Y L~ kLANCHO C:UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 14, 2004 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00965 -MANNING HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 23 single-family homes on 13.6 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue - APN• 1061-571-04, 08, 09, 21, and 22. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430, Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00575, Mills Act Application DRC2003-00576, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 On August 13, 2003, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration BACKGROUND. On August 13, 2003, the Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430, Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917, and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00575 and recommended approval of Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574 and Mills Act Application DRC2003-00576 On September 17, 2003, the City Council approved the Landmark Designation and Mills Act Application. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 1 7 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Demens-Tolstoy House; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Grandma Isaac House and Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre) ITEM "A" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00965-MANNING HOMES January 14, 2004 . Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: Protect Site -Single-Family Residential; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The 13 6 acre site is on the west side of Archibald Avenue, between Hillside Road and Wilson Avenue. The site slopes southerly at approximately 8 percent. The site has three remnant Eucalyptus windrows and numerous other trees scattered throughout the property. The site is primarily vacant with one existing single-family home and barn, and empty water retention basin near Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road The site also includes a partially developed Edison substation with block walls at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue that will be demolished The substation never became operational because equipment was never installed The site is currently being graded for future tract development, including relocation of the historic home. The site is surrounded by existing single-family developments to the north, south, east, and west that are zoned Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). To the north of the site is the historic landmark, the Demens-Tolstoy Ranch House, and to the west is the Grandma Isaac House • ANALYSIS. A. General• The project consists of the development of 22 single-family homes, and the relocation of the historic Toews (pronounced "Taze°) residence onto Lot 19 of Tract 16430, approved on August 13, 2003. The new homes will all consist of two-story structures ranging in size from 4,668 to 5,477 square feet. A total of three floor plans will be available with building elevations comprised of a mixture of Bungalow, French Country, Traditional, and Old California styles The home on Lot 18 that sides-on Archibald Avenue will have a usable wrap around porch in its design The other homes that side-on to Archibald Avenue do not have elevations to allow wrap around porch designs. The floor plans and architecture have been staggered so that identical plans are not located on adjacent lots The homes have also been designed to comply with the 30-foot building envelope and other development standards required by the City's Hillside Development Ordinance and Development Code None of the homes, including the Toews residence, are expected to block the views of the surrounding property owners to the north or west All of the homes have been designed with front-on garages Plan 3 is the only plan that also includes a 2-car side-on garage The garages include built in window features facing the street B Historic Toews Residence The Landmark Alteration previously approved by the Planning Commission will relocate this historic home to Lot 19 (Exhibit "H") The home will be plotted facing north, rather than its current south-facing orientation Another significant change would be demolition of the existing wooden barn Anew, detached three-car • garage/barn emulating the architectural design of the removed barn will be bwlt to serve the home Other proposed alterations include installation of hardscape, landscaping, walls and fences, and interior improvements as necessary to make the house habitable A2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00965-MANNING HOMES . January 14, 2004 Page 3 C. Design Review Committee• On November 18, 2003, the Committee (McNiel, Fletcher, Buller) reviewed the protect and recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subject to staff's comments with the additional condition that the applicant dress-up the rear of each building elevation to include more architectural elements (Exhibit "G") The Committee asked the applicant to work with staff to resolve the issue The applicant has since added additional roof wrap around elements to the rear elevations to satisfy the Committee's condition, as shown in the attached elevations (Exhibit °D°). D. Technical and Grading Review Committees: The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. E Tree Removal Permit• Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 was approved by the Planning Commission in August 2003 To meet replacement requirements, environmental mitigation and conditions of approval required the following. 1) all Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, and 2) The applicant shall design the new site of the relocated Toews Residence so that it meets the spent and intent of the original site layout, to the satisfaction of the City Planner In addition, staff recommended the applicant preserve and relocate two existing, mature Oak trees from the southeast corner of the site to the northeast corner of the site where the Toews residence is to be relocated. The applicant agreed to preserve and relocate the trees. In addition, the applicant also suggested relocating four additional Oak trees from another location in the City where he is doing construction. The relocated trees would be located on each side of the entrances to the two cul-de-sac streets Staff approved the applicant's suggestion. F Neiohborhood Meetinp• On December 4, 2003, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the home product design. There were approximately 12 people that attended the meeting. The residents asked general questions about the protect and how it would affect existing surrounding development Among other things, the residents were mainly concerned with relocation of the historic Toews residence The owner of the historic Tolstoy residence, lust north of the protect site, explained that he was concerned with the height of the Toews residence after it is relocated to the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue. He felt the home would block and/or take away from his home when it is moved to its current proposed location He felt the home should be sunk down to reduce its impact to the other historic home The developer explained the location (Lot 19 is significantly lower than Hillside Road) and height of the Toews residence would not take away from the Tolstoy home and, in fact, would add to the look of the area because the exterior of the home would be refurbished with new paint and roof material There would also be a new garage built and special landscaping provided to enhance the character of the historic home. In addition to the historic home issues, the residents on the west side of the protect were concerned with proposed grade changes and one of the • proposed private equestrian trail easements. Mr and Mrs Thompson, at 5599 Klusman Avenue, were concerned with the finish pad level of the proposed home on Lot 13 because it would create slopes in the side and rear yards of the new home that may not be maintained by the future homeowner(s) They indicated that it could look unattractive on their side and bring their property values down The developer stated that he would I~.~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00965-MANNING HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 look into the issue and work with the City to resolve the issue if possible The developer has since relocated the wall on Lot 13 to the bottom of the slope to eliminate possibility of maintenance issues by future homeowner(s). Additionally, Mr. and Mrs Scott, at 5625 Klusman Avenue, stressed that they did not want to have the proposed pnvate trail easement between Lot 5 and 13 to terminate at their rear yard because it would allow visibility into their property. This trail is an important linkage that would meet, and form a T-intersection with, an existing 10-foot equestrian trail on the Scotts' property. The Scotts' live in Tract 9588, which has a continuous north-south 10-foot equestrian trail along the shared boundary with Tentative Tract 16430. The location is consistent with the previously approved subdivision map. Staff does not support any changes to the location of this trail RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2003-00965 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Re ully s itte Brad Buller City Planner BB•W MUna Attachments. Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibd "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit °G" Exhibit "H" Draft Resol - Site Utilization Plan - Site Plan - Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections - Elevations - Floor Plans - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated November 18, 2003 - Historic House Relocation Exhibit ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00965 i A~ ~~ ~~ A -z-~! as ~ M a~ FW- Z V N W Z~~~ ~~~ N 5; ~~ ~i ~ ~ e ~.no~ e o ~~R ~" y~? :~ `a ~pE _~ ~ R!p ~io a 5 ~~~"~# ~ ~~~ e ~ ~ ~ 6 p~ NYr W le~~~~ ~; e; 9,lil zo ~ ~ ea~~ ~~ I~ii~ ; W Z ° 8 ~ ~E,~~a4 kIE 8~7I d@gR~ t • p R ~~ ~ ~I ~ 8 €I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~-~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~°~14lffl~l~ 4~~;•~ ~~ ~1 I' !'fie '~ 1 1 rl r ~~ _ ~~ ,'°~I , ,~~ :~ ~' t ' ~ , '~ i~ ~' ,. ~." ~_ ',i, ~~ ;, 4! L70kLL -,, 'T~ ~\ ~ 1, ,i F . 1 g o ~ . R ~ ,~g = _ ~ . i = ni-~~ n u~ .~ ~ ~~ . ;. ~~ t~. ~, ,~ ,~t ; ~, ~, '; r a ~, ~~ I .1~ ~~ , ~ , ~' ~'~ ~L i~ ~, `i ~ F , i C ~' ;~ A`k ~ jll }~ ij liil 1 0 =: €~~ t ., ° €~~ ~ . ~~~ W O R = ~~~ °0 ~M~ F ~ ~ g O ~A # 05 Q ~ ~ ~ C ~~ O ~ W Z ~ ~' ~~ `~~d ~ ~ r ' 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ pp 1 8 ~~~~E~~~~I~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~I."~iili~yl~ 4~d.~~•~ i P w tom, ~ 1 1 1 i 1 ~~ = ,; ~~~. 1 1 L 1 ~fi i l'` 1, x ',~,J ~a~ i .~ ~c F . •` `9 ~ ~~ ~'4L f a~~ ~ !s :; ~~~~ .° ~ ,_ ~ ~3s ~ s ~~~ W O R ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~~~ ~ 6~g _. ww F W ~ F ~Og# ~ eppp& ~ Qr W q ~ n~ $~ • Z i ~ g `~ y3 ~ ~ ~ V ~ Q ~ OG F ~~~ 4 P~ ~ I '~~ l~~ 'N i i+;, x+~ M~ ~~~~ ' • e sy_iY;~-%~,,r,J T.4 ^ ~-'7 11 7i ,:,Yam Y' I 1 ,,;~ ::~t ;..,, .:~ '~ i 4~ r F B` i a. k, ._:,. ~~ ~~ I /1 1 l~ I W ~~ B ~~~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ 0 W tBq ~~ ar ~ y ~~ m 1 ~~~E ~.. Z~ ~ ~ Z ~~ mi ~~~ ~ ~ ~ !~!!~ W Z o o ~ gi ~ ~ ~ ~ • iii/ ~ dye g ~3~ S r ,~ s i ¢ € =o g~E y: se o a- Iar ~ a~~i 1. F~! ~~:~+~g ~~~~ag 3; #~ 5E 3<4i 6e ~~ 3 7 m - - - ~~o- M < ~ ~ Q ~ O Q g ~ o $ Q ~ ~I • ~I~ ij TRADff70NAL ELEVATION RAN 1 -FRONT flFVATION ~.® ~_ ALTA LOMA 23 g~L~gM .~L~q„=v A03 luninuluwmtlpmnnl ~ n c w rt s c* s c ALTA LOMA, WFORNA .wa MANNWG E10ME5 .eew Qgl • 3 3 ~ gg °g $ ?~ ~~ €?E ~ 4 e u ~J® L--t:l__I `> 0 0 z~Ag ~e 4: e o <- [aB ~ ybyl ~1 <. i C/ZW ~i~p~ ~~~la <6 I~E 3<~i 6e M N Q O ~ g o F- J ~ Q 1 1 • i`~ g~~ g ~~ \~ O 5 ~n Q € xo 04? ~: vv v I b~bj !~ i F°~ ~i:~a~g f~~~v ~a 0~E 3<€i 0e M N <Q O < ~ 0 u J f t; O 7t F f J ~ Q 9 E ¢gl • ~~EE ~z p p [- iap z~ a^i ~, ~aUi B ~~. ~~~ fz( pp Qu a1 kE 3~in v 3 <Et 6i M N g O" J F O I.... F- J ~ Q J Q @ su i¢E ,z Ot t (- teB ai pt ~~~ 41 Wt ~x~~a t fz~ o ~o I~E 3<~i ii M N< O o Q < f"' ~ J Q pi 6 ___ u ~L--~--- -- - 6 ® ALTA LOMA 23 W,,,,,M~ ~„,.,~„ A w8 Iwnnnlnninnlninind 0vc~ir sue.. ~'s~wvc, ALTA LOMA, GLFORNIA `vww. unw .~ ws .s. . MANNPJG HOMES w'~vw'swwv m+m s • • C~ rn ; Q € =~~,'s ;=~o <- ~ se e, ~, Fit ~~~~e ~_~ o 'Q 4e 6i 3<ff~6e i M N Q O O ~ ~. J ~ Q ,-- , e ¢g ~~BA ~E 9:,e o Q' X60 O~ ~~ ~fu~ ~ A SAS 3i~ ^E 3; eA BA ~o 3<6~ Ra M N ~ z 0 0 Q ~ H 7 J Q 6 v~ • CJ i e a ~r Li ~~c r. .a _, ~, -p ~ t t tr ~ < y fr z ~ ~ r ~ V `V -' I i r 6 N ~ e Q € sJ ~O 0 ~20A 0 <- ~,e 1 31 ~! 1 (~! ~~ Nu' ~i~§ g F~~~e ~a 0~0 3<Bi 6m N ~~g O" J F J Q 5 ~` M e Q 4 x~~p pe ~z e!a <- ia6 ~ ^6~~s 1 Nom[ ~ ~ UC ~S~Y 6 fx~~o 30~~~° A 0 3<FiGe M N ~ Y O~g J ~ O < F ~"" ~ J Q A 8 a • • ~~ b Y oX f T £ ~ & i i ~s3 ~ ~tl~ Y i b # ~ ~ ~ ® - P}~ A / / r EI p I ~j k=~ ~ I I ~ o ff ~ ® ~ o Pb P 0 ~~ tE ALI l~ Q @ =~e~ ;: e v (- IaB x ae ~ i_v+ g ~~w'~~ f~~ v 3; a~ ~! 3<Ei Wi M N ~~ J O J ~ Q BW - -P~'L\------- - -------- ~A ¢~ ~~i. 0 W ~~ 4 su@O ~E ,z 1 t 6- lel j Ydl ~l ~ ~~Y ~~yyU pp Sri ~' F~~ °a 3p4a4o 3<€16e M N O~g Q o ~~ H J ~ Q i 6 W A ~_ ~ Q Y su B R ~z ~R ! <- !a/ ~ 61 ~1 (U! ~. ~]~ 4 Ii1 0 ~a R~! 3<6i Re M N 0 0 Q < F- 7 J Q 4 E ~~ a e 'S " g ~ 8 4 ~ t i y I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ® ~ ~ ZZ Q 0 ~ ` ~ Q I > I r' O ~ ~ < o ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~i ® I O i ® I ~\ N \ \ \ \ _ F~ kG X - 3 c~ 5~ ~ o _ Ob P y a % Df~ - - _-y~ '-- Q 4 x~gs r Vi 6R ~~ <- !eB i a~ ~ ~~ <: ~1~ ~i:~+~g ?~~'Y 3<4i 6m M <N ~ < ~ V O F O J ~ Q fl e 6 • • C J 3 1 C ~~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 0 6 ~ ~ ~ f G .~ 3$ ~ ~ ~ /~ 9 / ~ I / i ; / -0 1 F O I t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .~ ~ I W ~ ' .~ ~ I ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ a rc O ® ~ 1 l~~ t r ~:3: c I p~ i.-, c ry ,~ ~ ~£#.I ~ s ~~ ~ ~ i <-0, oa>.~ W A ~ e Q g ~~89 ? .~pR ~i ~ y6yl ayaayl 4nf#p ~~ ii _ w + A 2.W.~ ~~~~o ;6 R~. 3<4i Rs N Y Q u ~ ~ O F J ~ Q gd - -L ~~~--- -- ---- BUNGALOW ELEVATION 'U OLD CAIFORMA ELEVATION RAN 3 -FRONT EIEVAT10N5 m ALTA LOMA 23 WIWAM MEZ' LHALON A.20 hwnntlniwwlmmwl m ~e=~BC i s r,°v m, ALTA LOMA, CALFORNA MANNPJG HOMFS ~ ~ m s • i ;-ice I I • nuanoHU nEVnnoH R.AN 3 - FltOHf FIEVATION ALTA LOMA 23 w,~~A-~~L„.~=„ A~.21 ALTA LOMA, CAIFORNA MAMRJG HOMES 0 `> ~t N N Q f xu ~4 e 9=ae o j a.°a ~ <"~ ~wr x ~ ~ fi~~Q au I~E a4e a 3<`si 4B M N Q ~ Q ~ ~ o Q < f-- ~ J Q 1 6 1 EL ~ ~ c~ :i 3 Y F Ti ~~~ 7 ~ C L C ' ~ E ~ e ~ o ~ g p 3 ~ ~ t ~ ~~~ 6 ~ p ~ S ef ~' y 3 3 5 .$ i 3 ~ ~ i~£i y ~ C 5 ~ ~`D~~ 5 i i i ~ _ r`~ ] ~ 4 ® F y ; ~ 5S ~ ~ ~ o I ® ~ ~ I ~ ~p.:~ ~'I ~ £' I L' b b IG. ~~ . ~ y J ~ n ~ i~ ~~ i ~ Ek `~~ Q±~ ±Q F ~ ~ h T s~ PR P p PR N Q 4 ~z~d 0 6l ~8 bP ~P ~~ a_~p~ ~2. i~~ FI ~'P `6 ,~! 3<~i Go M N ~ Q ~ ~ 5 ~ 0 O H ~ 7 Q i 6 d RZ~ ~~~a~ ~N~o 4 •.uw ir.• - ~~ ~ ®® ~ nuav mvraw..w REAR ELEVATION ' 1 ~ - ~ `. ~ ~ J \ ~ /.. ~~~' R ~ s.i ~ } l a f ~ - - - - W ~ W ~ K. ~ I I ~ -uwiM•~.mucx um RtOM ELEVATION l PLAN 3 -OLD CAL6CNtMA Fl20NT AMID REAR ELEVATIONS a~4~ ALTA LOMA 23 ~~ III~~.'I'I ImnunbWnutl~uuunl eacni.[c~s iNc • ~ u 61<•NP.M~ID~sM P. L'RMCw A.24 ALTA LOMA, CALffORMA « •n.. c. MANNWG HOMES >ne v.~ee m Z 7 ~ ~ ~~ i $ ~ ~ 5 333_ U E s ~' ~_ E € q 5 6 i ~ 4 ! ~ ~ M ~ f1 /~ r I ^ ~f F.. r ~~I ~~ ~ ~ ^ I I E ~ °o ^ ~-~ rr o.Fr.r.S ~ r rr < ~ ~ z c ;tk +-. ~ ~ a ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ I r w ~ r ~ ~ ~ } r -' oc I t I r 6 ' i _ f Y I ~ r 3 i r 9 ~ }~} F ` y ~ ' i o „z 3 P N Q F x~§g 4e ~z ev v Q- Sa6 i a~ ~ ~~ a: ~1 ~ v~i9 ~i~~Eg Fz 1~v (u RRB 3<~i Re M u 0 O F f J ~ Q S J ~~~ _-_ REAR ELEVATK)N III ~~ I PUN 3 - TRADfT10NAL FRONT AND REAR ElEVAT10N5 ® ALTA LOMA 23 WILLIAM MEZ ~ LMAICM A.26 ~111111111~III111111~I11111111~ Pi A~nM_uR~_w<`0a111 ALTA LOMA, CALFORNA Ms9 MANJBJG HOMES w. arts w.n~nas~ i • • N Q s xu E~E ~z EA 0 Z 3l Sj ^^l [.i _`n~p+ ~ ~Zra q f1~ p au I~E 3<~i 6e M N Q Ogg o ¢< F- ~ A 6 ~~ ~rn . FN OQ i ~u 9~A ;z 6e a <- ! ee x e~~i ~~ z~~ o~ 2.~ ' Ii~ a 'o- 4i ~v 3<ff~se M N 0 J O Q < J Q ~ v 6 Ha ~.J - -------- --t I > II.,~.,L,~.~.,~. - ~ ~w~~,~,.~.lml ?lrYiflYll~1r11uG n _ R xvwrncu u+wn<rnlur~s INI BYI6 4 CCO S N N YdIM WKt WIrtS xpOOGI\IIY LER ELEVATION wu.+rm. rrs.+succo f rncro uz.ro.ym.. - -_ wawr.cu euumc. - womu .cam ' RIQi( HFVATION .~..,..ti .W,..~,....~~... WRAP AROIRJD PORCH CONDITION PLAN 3 - TRAIXLIONAL SDE ELEVATIONS V ALTA LOMA 23 ~t LOT 18 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WpLLIAM HEZMA 4A~LCM A o30 ALTA LOMA. UlK7RNA sao.N~.~~~ I'"~...m9 MANNPIG HOMES ~o~ec unv.ur ~ ° ~ ~ Ai -~ 'I a. 1 ~~ _ ~1 - i ___ _ _t_y y.t X \ i^ ,K ~ pry, i~. it I i i ~~ T. /` f ~, J, ~° ~ / U 1 ' ~I' ~ `--~-~ i i ~ , p I i a~ i ~ /` -- h k l ~ q4 F ~ ' ~ p I / ~ I ~, c /~ %'<- f. __ _v_ ___ ___ h $ ~ , t i O r:°v __ :_ .=-c -~ ~ I 4 ___________________ _____ _________ _ ~ .~,~(- ~~ i ______ ~__________~__F__lr._, ~~T~ ~`r~ i '~ ~ ~~ JI ~ ~ N][ Q i ~< ~` ~ l~ i i ----- -- --'--'- '- ' ~~ ~ A a r--. ~ ~_~...._._ j ,~ t i e' - -- ,. ~ ~ i is ig C....._._,..1- 3 , + _ 6B 13 i t :6i ~ \ ~r ._.3_ ~ i~ A~ V ()~~~I -I H ~~m~~ Zn \ 6 ._-______ ! ~ ~ V C' y ~ oB ~~tONC -oo ` /, ' ~. _ ~ ~_- '~ 4 Q •i sub®~e ~z ap v <- ipB ? vz ~p ~~ a_"€~ ~i:~~g Fz~~p ac i~E ~p p 3<<t 6e M N ~ Z a l~ u J ~ 6 6 f J < Q 5 G • s • ~,~ ~, -- 0"'°71 U ~~~,;,; - PATIO ;. ,. BORM S -'- ~ , ~, ~. T~' y.ti. >. ' r. .J - (--~ > 7 ~N- -~y .--- ~ iy s r -'i IRPFR LEVa - un sf PLAN 2 - S1I7 TOTAL BUJWLOW PIEVATII 5 BDRM / 4 i/2 BATH / OPT BDItM 6 4 CAR GARA(~ • ' ,1 1 Ll -~ T .~~,_ ;,~~ STY ~~, POBa •• i• LowPR LEVa -use sF ALTA LOMA 23 00~~.._~e=M_~«0a~~ A.10 lunmulmmnibunwtl n rz c« n s c r s i rv c ALTA LOMA, CAIdORN1A MANNPJ('i HOMFS rl i ~ ~ IJ i . L ---1 - - II 1 ~~ - , ~'°~^9 n~ ' ' l ~ couarvARo y. 'a r -I \ L~ ~ ~ ; ~~ i....~ ~ o ~, , Pwpt ; lam: n I~. • - - -- --- ` ~~ . . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -. - -- M e~TM ^ -~ -- -; • ~ t m 7 M ~~ - - ~i , ~ ~ BDRM 7 = - - „ i „ ., ~. , ; .. ,' ~ ' ! t I , .__ , - ----------------- -~r ~ ~MS YHl I' LRPER LEVEL - 2686 SF 1" ~M 2 „ ~ ---- ~T% I ~? nJ -_- _- i i PLAN 3 -5477 OlD ULFORNIA I {gBQRM / 5 rr I BATFV STIIDV/ N OPT BSI --~---------• 121 2 CAR C ----- ,.~ - sATM 5~ , O - -- ;~; _ ~ Y~ ~,~'~? C- ~ ,~r." RA ) m ~ ~yy ,K~~ ~Y.'. i ( I ~ 1 __ ; -_ - ti } = ~~v,_ ~ ------- ---------- - r . / 1 ~ o I ..- a POR01 S1:UDY r-(«.(1 _I _I", _4J-_ - -- ---- -- 1-_ TOTAL SF EIFVATION JD RM/ RETREAT/ BCMM M 7_ ---_---- - ARA(~5 LOWER LEVEL - 2791 SF '~~ b ~, ALTA LOMA 23 Wp~~A=~~~ ~„,«„ A^19 ALTA LOMA, CALFORNIA InminNuninOnnmW maw„ n s c i s.mann MAM~JG HOMES • • CJ i~ ~1 .~ B ~~ ,. ~~ sal l~l ~ J '~ _r~ ~' 1 b~ - ~ I ~ , , e 61 _6! ~ ,- a ~ ~~~ , O ~~f •~~/`r/"\~ ~,~~ i~ ., ~~.~ i. X, ~_. ~~ se ~~~ ~ d i} ~ ___________, _ ______ ________ ___/ ~~--;o .__ ! i~ ~ Iii 'i .- 3 ~-_ F , __ ~ _ ~ 3 ~ '__~~ I t -- ; N~--_ ~~_ ~<~~ .~.f ~ ~~ --------------n - a ~s~; ~ --- .~ ~~~ i --------- j --;. ~'- O ~ $~ ~ -_ ~ I ~~ ...._._ - a t ~ ~ ._,~ _ ~ --- •. ,, .., I ------- - J , __~ ~ t €. 1 ~- ---- -~-- - ~ ~ m ------• - ~- -__ g ~ ~ - ~ : ~ ' s, ~ , .y ~ ~ ~ - -- ~ - --- ~ ~ r---•--,_ ~ - -- .I -- i , ~ - ---F--- -------------- ----------- --------------=' ~4 i~~, i s :~o~i - ~ _._.~ @, , FN a 00 0Q a~~i ~s 1 51 ~1 ~C N~~t of ~i~~. ~ 3:~~¢ ;e ,9f fa o 3<`Ef `n6 M Qg~ O~g ~° J ~ Q p~ 0 4 e I W Ntlld 3dtlJSONtlI ANtlNIWIl3Nd ~~ 9 F"~ ~ ~~e~ ~. eg=' !{~~ ; 2 i__ i d ,I u~ C 3 ~' °I Ct ~ ~1 ;q ~3 ~ t r~ 3F ~ ~V Y~~ .~4e 5 nor i Y~X \~ 1~~~ 0 8 .s"S3lNOH ONINNtlW~u YINN(TJI1VJ tlpNOWVppJ OIONVk IIFWI I]ViLL~ .sa.~e~,ssvwrnvi~v. ~~,=y~}~°.,`j~-j-- g $ ~ E ! 6 '~ W a ~ _O ~---- ----- J I ~ - 6 2 Y J 6 §~I U e Z ~ z ~ 8 °- ; a 4 Q ,i± ~~ p ~~~11(Jtiiif J{ ~ ~ i 5 s s Z ~; i ~ 4 ~;,gs ~~ i~9P13~€,ii;~did X31 9~ s 5 4~© ®~ I.If~. a + p ;i P 9 9 0 9 } i !L t. ~~p~ ~ J g3!p 3f ~~i~ s. d~ ~' d~ #i , i; y1~. ~' 1~ ~~~, ~ 1~ ?~ ~3 ii ~ ~~ pi~l~ ~~ ~i i~di ~~e~EaI~~B®o0o ~ p' J S~. v f e s t W 2 o ~ _ I ~~ ~~ ,- • • i ,, Ago d DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p m Warren Morelion November 18, 2003 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00965-MANNING HOMES-Thedesign reviewof building elevations and detailed site plan for 23 single-family homes on 13 6 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue - APN 1061-571-04, 08, 09, 21 and 22. Related File• Tentative Tract SUBTT16430, Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574, Landmark Alteration DRC2003-00575, Mills Act DRC2003-00576, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 Design Parameters The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16430 on August 13, 2003. The project consists of the development of 22 new single-family homes and relocation of the historic Toews residence onto Lot 19. The new homes will all consist of two-story structures ranging m size from 4,668 to 5,477 square feet A total of three floor plans will be available with building elevations comprised of a mixture of Bungalow, French Country, Traditional, and Old California styles The two Plan 3 homes that side-on Archibald Avenue will have usable wrap around porches. The floor plans and architecture have been staggered so that identical plans are not located on adjacent lots The homes have also been designed to comply with the 30-foot bwldmg envelope and other development standards requued bythe City's Hillside Ordinance and Development Code None of the homes, including the Toews residence, are expected to block the views of the surrounding property owners to the north or west All of the homes have been designed with front-on garages The Plan 3 is the only plan that also includes a 2-car side-on garage These garages include built in window features facing the street Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project None -The applicant has worked hard with staff to resolve all major issues Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Although it is not shown, the applicant has indicated that all of the homes meet the Hillside Ordinance building envelope requirements If the homes do not meetthe regwrements, then they should be redesigned to comply with the height and bulk restrictions The building envelopes should be included on the Elevation sheets as part of the final submittal package All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative block material Replot home on Lot 2 to comply with 10- and 15-foot side yard setbacks Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion ~1 1 All river rock material used on the project shall be real (not manufactured) ~~ ~~\ DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00965 -MANNING HOMES November 18, 2003 Page 2 2. To enhance the natural appearance of the lots, the applicant should incorporate the large rock boulders that may be unearthed during grading into the front yard and sloped area designs. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and approval subtect to the above listed comments Design Review Committee Action. Members Present. Larry McNiel, Richard Fletcher, Brad Buller Staff Planner Warren Morelion The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subtect to the above-mentioned comments with the following additional condition. Dress-up the rear of each building elevation to include more architectural elements The Committee asked the applicant to work with staff to resolve the issue The applicant agreed C~ r1 LJ Ay2 I --~ / w,".rl ~-(r,".-~~---~ -- , ;~ --a ~` . ~ ~ -~~- _ Ili i l' , ~/ i I J -, 13' ~;~ 1 - i , , - , ,Ill i , r Tj~ 130 5 a_', ~ I, ~I'~11~y11 ~p~~! ~~ -_ _ _ f--t2! t _ `.~r~~',; I ~I i ~~ ~ Ill (, DRNEWA 1 1 rs'%a1 ~i ~ ~ ~-~ i l_ _ 7 I I ~ -_- 1. _ I - I- - - -` _I-- f- - ~~ ' -- - f~ ~ ~` " ' 1 3=-- -- ~'-- - ~FtOPOSE~ 3 1 J ' ~ARAC,~ lI_I---- --- -- - FOR HIST --- -1= ~ ,- '-u'- - _ _ ~ -°- _24_ r i -„ - 1855 8 ;1858 ~ ___~~_ '- ~1nfl Ti AI ~, I-- Il - 4'IQ' `RWII~ /~ I~I -- ~ ~j, V~'ll _. ~~ .w I~- --~ ;~I ~~'~ Ili - ~ l ` 1~-- - " 'I I I - 1 ;- ' Ill I ' I , ~~~ r~ I II ip, ,l~ li-- ' I~~ 7 t' ~ .~~ `~4 ~a~ ~~~ ;::^~i`ry. = D' v5r ,' ;..I' ~iUt,'z I I- _ -,' ll 1 ~r ~~~E ~; .~ ~ ~ ~~`; ~ ~ ~ ...~~; _ ,s~ti ~ .,.,~..v~,-~~,. ~~. I ~ ~0~, ~ r i-I y 'rfn.}4. r ~'~'~~"; ~ i"~'e' ` z X~~'.ty.'~' 1- _ /i I \ ~\ I a$,~%.NS~ '~.jz x;;-41 d 3<s_ ~'vr ~~~V3 i ";`~~"=a ~ -~`' ~ , ~ ~ _ -- _ - --'_ ~~' ~'-- " ~ ~-~; sl;=~, ,-:;.,° , J ~~ _ PARK PF~Af~ erF.. `~ ,.... -- - -~ ~ ~ 1838? "~ I I .,.. .. _o_ ___ °°" ' ~"' TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16430 I HISTORIC LOT 19 ~'~ ~ HISTORIC HOUSE ' M MOMFNC ~ RELOCATION EXHIBIT DATE PREPARED: JULY 22, 2003 m,s, ~.ar. z.,~ ,~,.,,~;,,,,,~' SCALE \"=50' CfTY OF RANCFIO Cl1CAMONOh COUNTY OF SAN BB~'IAFlDIdO, SPATE OF CALFORNA ` ~~j F\~N~WKTnFmre9m+erte.y ~/2~/w ~~ _\ • RESOLUTION NO 04-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00965 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 23 SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES ON 13 6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1067-571-04, 08, 09, 21, AND 22 A Recitals 1 Manning Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-00965, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, between Hillside Road and Wilson Avenue The property contains the histoncToevos Residence and bam, a partially developed Edison substation, and numerous trees, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is improved with the histonc Demens- Tolstoy Residence, the property to the west is improved with the histonc Grandma Isaac Residence, and the properties to the south and east consist of single-family tract development, and c The site was previously subdivided for 23 lots (Tract 16430) on August 13, 2003 In conjunction with the proposed subdivision, the Planning Commission and Histonc Preservation Commission also approved Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00575 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 and recommended approval of Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574 and Mills Act Application DRC2003-00576 (subsequently approved by the City Council on September 17, 2003) for the Toews Residence to designate the home a histonc landmark and relocate it to Lot 19, to be created by the proposed tentative tract, and d The lot sizes range from 20,140 to 28,185 square feet in size, with an average lot size of 22,570 square feet, and A~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0401 DRC2003-00965 -MANNING HOMES January 14, 2004 . Page 2 The home designs meet all Hillside and Development Code standards, and The site wll gam access from two cul-de-sac streets from Archibald Avenue 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the wcirnty 4 On August 13, 2003, a Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) All Conditions of Approval from Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16430, Landmark Designation DRC2003-00574, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00575, Mlls Act Application DRC2003-00576, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00917 shall apply with approval of this protect 2) All extenor retaining walls, freestanding walls, and open view fencing visible to the public shall be made of a decorative matenal v~nth plasters and cap The plasters shall have a stone treatment and be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size The final design and location of the walls, including number of pilasters, shall be subtect to the satisfaction of the City Planner Enpineenna Division 1) All pertinent conditions of Tract Map SUBTT16430 shall apply 2) The final map for Tract SUBTT16430 shall be recorded pnor to the issuance of bulling permits Aas PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-01 DRC2003-00965 -MANNING HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 3 3) Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project 4) Provide a drainage report with the Rough Grading plan submittal to appropriately size the 'V' gutter along the private equestrian trails Environmental Mitioation Measures 1) This project shall implement all mitigation measures adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No 03-107, approving TentaLve Trail Map SUBTT16430 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS A~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00965 SUBJECT: 23 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: MANNING HOMES LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, tts _J_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The appltcant shall reimburse the City, tts agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-01, Standard _/ /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to ail parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and . grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-10-03 1 Protect N o DRC2003-00965 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldtng, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldtng permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be /~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~~_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 10 All bwldtng numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, -/-/ - including proper illumination - 11 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed ~~_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developershall upgrade and construct ail trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced _/ / with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" togs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/~_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-toot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora ~ / distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching _ _ the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail _/_/_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at ~_/ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with _ appropriate fencing 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/_/_ animals where zoning regwrements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdiwsions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs SC-10-03 2 ~ \V Project No DRC2003-00965 Comoletion Date 13 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ . Homeowners' Assocation are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Ariorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs tirst A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Divjsion a list of the name and address of then officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 14 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 15 The protect contajns a designated Hjstorical Landmark The site shall be developed and _/~ maintained m accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No DRC2003-00575 Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subfect to Historic Preservation Commission revew and approval 16 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/ /_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter. 17 Construct block walls between homes (j a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ • wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 18 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 19 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 20 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant _/_/_ 21 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk _/_/_ 22 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Detajls shall be included in bwlding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street _/_/_ • SC-10-03 3 / ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-00965 Comoletian Date F. Landscaping i A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~_/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/~ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/___/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously ~_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development ~~_ Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~~_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/ /_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 10 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear _/_/_ feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall complywith the Citys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) G. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit • SC-10-03 4 A~ Protect No DRC2003-00965 Comoletion Date H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and locatior of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provde a solid overhead structure foi mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of th6 overhead structure shali be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance o1 bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Diwsion Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the prolect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential prolect or mafor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school tees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ ~-/_ ~~- -/-/- -/-/- SC-10-03 5 ~S` Protect N o DRC2003-00965 Completion Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/~ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~~_ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Bwlding Code, Cdy Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sails report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Oiticial prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the ~~_ standards contained in the Hdiside Development Regulations Section 17 24 070. 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 33 total feet on Hillside Avenue _/~_ 44 total feet on Wilson _/_/ 44 total feet on Archibald Avenue ~_/~ 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ SC-10-03 6 ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00965 Completion Date N. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Archibald Avenue X X X X X X Wilson Avenue X X X X Hillside Road X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays wlli be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item ~~ • Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size• Oty HILLSIDE ROAD Lagerstromemia White Crape Myrtle 3 ft 20 ft o c 24•inch FIII-in indica'Natchez' Hybnd box WILSON AVENUE P A less than 8ft Lasgerstroemia Lavender Crape aft 20 fl o c 24-inch indica'Muskogee' Myrtle Hybnd box P A greater than 8ft Cinnamonium Camphor Tree 8ft 30 ft o c 15-gal camphors ARCHIBALDAVENUE Foreground Tree Pyrus calleryana Bradford Pear 3 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal P A less than 8ft 'Bradford' STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR LMD PLAN REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS ARCHIBALDAVENUE Background Tree Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Accent Tree Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch indica Hybrid-Dark Pink box SC-10-03 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERW ISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutnent deficiencies may require backidl soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only T ~~~ __J_% ~~- Protect No DRC2003-00965 ComoleUOn Date O. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Pubitc Works Standards shall ___/~_ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Archibald Avenue 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or ~~_ other acceptable non-Irrigated surfaces 3 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~~_ ~~ Bec Mast Archibald Avenue APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors ~~_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within ~~_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices ~~ ~' ~1: Windows y 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking dewces and should not be able to be Irfted ~~_ from frame or track in any manner (J ~. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~~_ visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-10-03 8 ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00965 N. Street Improvements All public Improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, communlrytralls, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street Improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Ilghts, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not Ilmited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Archibald Avenue X X X X X X Wilson Avenue X X X X Hillside Road X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Clvll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the CIty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permts regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch (at Intersections) or 2-Inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the CIty Engineer Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots Completion Date ~~- ~~- ~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~~- ~-~- ~. -~ SC-10-03 7 ~ f~ Protect No DRC2003-00965 Comoletion Date , Street names shall be approved by the Ciry Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~ ~~_ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per Clty Standards in ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program ~ Install street trees per CIry street tree design guideline~~ards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the publlc landscape Improvement plans The Ciry Engineer reserves the right to adfust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spading Slze' Gty. HILLSIDE ROAD Lagerstromemia White Crape Myrtle 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-Inch FIII-in Indica'Natchez' Hybnd box WILSON AVENUE P A less than B ft Lasgerstroemia Crape Myrtle a ft 20 fl o c 24-Inch indica "Muskogee' Hybnd -Lavender box P A greater than 8ft Clnnamonium Camphor Tree 8 ft 30 fl o c 15-gal camphors ARCHIBALDAVENUE Foreground Tree Pyrus calleryana Bradford Pear 3 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal P A less than 8 ft 'Bradford' STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR LMD PLAN REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS ARCHIBALDAVENUE Background Tree Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Accent Tree Lagerstroemia Crape Myrtle 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-Inch Indlca Hybnd-Dark Pink box 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the CIry Inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per publlc improvement plans only O. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the CIry Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Archibald Avenue 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces ~-~- ~~- ~~. SC-10-03 8 ~~ Project No DRC2003-00965 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Comolet~on Date All regwred public landscaping and vrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the I ~_/_ developer until accepted by the City Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respectroe _/~_ Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue P. Drainage and Flood A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~~~, approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the ~_J_ property from adjacent areas Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk Q. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~ ~_J_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map wail be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them R. General Requirements and Approvals ~~_ A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for ail I ~~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permd issuance if no map is involved ~- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used ~~- ~_/- SC-10-03 9 ~ `~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT/FILE #: DRC2003-00965 APPLICANT NAME: Archibald Adventures PROJECT NAME: Alta Loma 23 tract 16430 OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 LOCATION: Archibald s/o Hillside FLOOR AREA (S): Approx. 4545 sq ft DATE: 12-02-2003 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: _Type V-N PLAN TYPE: SFR tract, public streets FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi PLANNER: Warren Morelion ANNEXATION possible Fire: Non-High Hazard THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply. Water (fire) plans must be approved by RCFPD and CCWD prior to permit issuance 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants mcommercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-faintly residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fve hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 tt d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fve hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft e Fire hydrants are to be located i At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks u At intersections m On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs v The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire vi Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building ~~ 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residu pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provde the required tare flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide requred fire flow 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size. FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Number of Fire Hydrants Prowde one fue hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spacing and distribution requirements FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined• Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The mrnimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driwng surtace shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 3 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fve vehicles Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Building permits will not be issued until the water (fire) plans are submitted and approved by CCWD and Fire Construction Services Complete the following: R~ 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on- site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at ail times, in accordance with Fire District Standards 3 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead- end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire Distract standards r ~l 1 . T H E C I T Y O F ANCtlO UCAMONGA StaffReport DATE: January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, V-192; LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE-APN201-1t32~4. RelatedFle:TR.16237 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On July 30, 1992, Parcel Map 13692 recorded with an Irrevocable Offer of Parcel °A°. Parcel °A° was offered as dedication for said map's master plan, providing for future public access to Parcel 2. The proposed development of Tract Map 16237 has reconfigured the master plan street configuration, thereby, making Parcel "A° unnecessary and unusable. On February 13, 2003, Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 16237 per Resolution No. 02-26 with the condition to vacate the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A°. Replacement access to Parcel 2 has been provided through Lot 5 of Tract Map 16237. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ Dan Jame Senior Civil Engineer ITEM "B" DJ:hh Attachment: Vicinity Map Exhibit "A° -Legal Description Exhibit "B° -Vacation Exhibit era -2- A r ~~ ~f _ I t N `~ ~ _ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~3 rrE~: V/~/N/TY MAP ~~: SU~VAC l92 EXHIBIT A (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) SHEET 1 OF 1 PARCEL "A" PARCEL MAP NO. 13692 P. M. B. 167 / 94 - 95 The land described herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, as per Map recorded in Book 167, Pages 94 and 95 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Parcel "A" as shown on said Parcel Map No. 13692; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Parcel Map No. 13692, South 00° 51' 13" West, 31.67 feet to the beginning of anon-tangent curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 50.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears South 04° 43' 19" East; thence Westerly and Northwesterly along said curve, 64.19 feet through a central angle of 73° 33' 15" to a point on the Northerly line of said Parcel Map No. 13692, a radial line through said point bears South 68° 49' 56" West; thence Easterly along said Northerly line, South 89° 52' 40" East, 51.21 feet to the Point of Beginning. Contains 1216.75 Sq. Ft. or 0.028 acres, more or less. As shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. p NANO SVR ~m BRIAN K. MIC ELSON, L S # 7320 Exp. 06/30/05 MY LICENSE EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2005 s No 7320 ~. OF CAS-~FO~ SHEET 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT B (SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION) PARCEL "A", PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, P.M.B. 167 / 94-95 I I r J ~~1.~ r~ 1 ~/,i i ~~ PJr~ rlJ~~l i i ~ ~~ i ~ r r r l J l~l ) J P.o B. I f ~~ r~ ~ .E LEGAL ~ ~ l 6g°A9y6'~ DESCRIPTION l ~IJ N, ~~ 330 08' I ~ (~~ ~C~ [?~~ N 89°52'40" W ~~~ l ~/ -- --- 0 51.21' ~ ~~ ~ °~ , ~° PARCEL ';~ c~' ~` ~~ /~ 11 ~ ~ ~ .P iS' !'1 ~ o ~ ~ f~ 1 T I `. ~ _. L °64.19 ~ ~\~~~' / / / h J1~J r~ ~ ~ ~ g~ i I~ .~/ ~~lJ, l~~J~ ~ ~o ary~~ ~ Z ~~% %~ I / ~ ,~ r,l~~J.~, l ~ ~ / J f~ ~ J ~ ~' c~ ~ ~~ r I , ~ ~I COI N h ~p 3V to e~ osr~oros BRIAN K MICKELSON, L S. # 7320 SCALE sTq} No 732o~~C' MY LICENSE EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2005 1" = 20' T H E A N C H O O F UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -A residential subdivision of 6 singlA-family lots on 1.68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue - APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00358, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 6single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest wmer of Hermosa Avenue and Base Line Road -APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2003-00726 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A request to allow an 8-foot high wall for sound attenuation purposes along the northern and eastern boundaries of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, and to allow up to a 7-foot high wall by adding 1 foot to an existing wall along the southern boundary of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 for privacy purposes, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted for a residential subdrvision of 6 single-family lots on 1.68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-041-57 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, Development Review DRC2003-00358, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 57 dwelling units per acre ITEMS "C,K,L" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16554 AND DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 2 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninc: North - Multiple Family Residential (condominwms)/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family ResidentiaULow Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Edison Substation/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Medum Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Charactenstics• The 1.68 acre site slopes gently to the south, with two mature trees on each side of the Minor House, a designated historic landmark. The Minor House will be preserved by relocating to one of the proposed lots. Both trees will be preserved and incorporated into the rear yard of Lot 1. The existing cobble wall will be demolished on the Base Line Road frontage. Portions of the cobble wall along the Hermosa Avenue frontage will be removed to allow the proposed cut-de-sac to take access off Hermosa Avenue. ANALYSIS A. General. The density of the protect will be 3 57 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the Basic Development Standards of the Development Code. The house product consists of two floor plans, ranging in square footage from 3,409 for Plan 1 to 3,600 for Plan 2. Portions of the elevations on both plans have been designed with wood siding and decorative wood bracing, thereby incorporating a design element of the historic Minor House Each floor plan has been designed with ledge stone on the entire wall plane over the entryway, providing a rich focal point A detached two-car garage matching the materials and Craftsman architectural style of the Minor House will be constructed adjacent to the relocated Minor House on Lot 6. All lots will have decorative driveways and garage doors that complement the Craftsman architectural style of the detached garage for the Minor House. The Minor House, a designated historic landmark, is presently located at the northeast corner of the protect site Concurrent with the Development Review and Tentative Tract Map applications on the subject site, a Landmark Alteration Permit (DRC2003-00711) has been filed to relocate the Minor House to Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision. The Landmark Alteration Permit is on the Historic Preservation Commission's January 14, 2004, agenda for consideration A. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554. The applicant is proposing a 6-lot infdl subdivision. Lot sizes for the proposed subdivsion range from 9,400 square feet to 12,200 square feet, which are substantially larger than the subdivision directly to the west All lots meet or exceed the Basic Development Standards for width, depth, frontage, and area. B Minor Exceotion DRC2003-00726. The protect includes an application for a Minor Exception (DRC2003-00726) to allow a perimeter wall height of 8 feet along the northern boundary of the C.~\L~L 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16554 AND DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 3 project and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 for sound attenuation purposes, and to allow up to a 7-foot high wall by adding 1 foot to an existing wall along the southern boundary of proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 for pnvacy purposes The standard height limit for walls m residential districts is 6 feet The proposed perimeter wall along the Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue frontage will be decorative, consisting of two contrasting types of split-face block, with ledge stone pilasters at 10 feet on center. An acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed, and the study concluded that all lots would be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA. The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with a 6- to 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed around the northern boundary of the project and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1. The pad elevations of the proposed subdivision have been engineered to be as low as possible, but because of a natural grade difference and an existing retaining wall near the south property line, there is an approximate 4-foot grade difference between Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the proposed subdivision and the existing lots to the south Staff believes the request for a Minor Exception is fustified for sound attenuation and pnvacy purposes. C. Desion Review Committee: The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) on November 4, 2003 The Committee recommended approval, subtect to minor • design modifications that have been included as conditions in the attached Resolution of Approval D. Gradino Review Committee: The protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on November 4, 2003 The Committee regwred that drainage easements be indicated on the Tentative Tract Map, driveway grades be speafied, and pad elevations on Lots 1, 2 and 3 be lowered in order to reduce driveway grades The applicant made the requested revisions, and the revised protect was reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee on December 2, 2003, with conditions that have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Technical Review Committee. The Techrncal Review Committee reviewed the protect on November 4, 2003. The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. F Environmental Assessment• Part 1 of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study. Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out At build-out, the protect site will be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA within 199 feet of Hermosa Avenue, and greater than 60dBA within 368 feet of Base Line Road. Accordingly, an acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed, and the • study concluded that all lots would be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with a 6- to 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed around the perimeter of the protect's boundary The study concluded that with standard construction requirements of the California Bwlding Code, the proposed houses will C~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16554 AND DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 4 meet the interior noise level regwrements of 45 dBA or less The masonry wall and adherence to California Building Code will reduce the noise impacts to a less than significant level The Minor Exception DRC2003-00726 is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). The protect is within an urbanized area with an average slope of less than 20 percent and does not in any way change the land use or density. There are two mature trees on both sides of the Mmor House, a Frwtless Mulberry and an Avocado A certified arbonst evaluated both trees, and both trees were found to be healthy. The Avocado tree does not meet the criteria for a heritage tree. A mitigation measure has been included requiring that the Fruitless Mulberry tree be saved by transplanting or replaced with the largest nursery grown specimen available to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The protect site has been identified as a'Histonc Resource° because it contains the Mmor House, a designated local Historic Landmark, per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed to identify all potentially significant cultural and archaeological resources The report reviewed historical records, literature, and archives Afield reconnaissance survey was conducted by walking a • series of parallel transects across the protect site and meandering transects around the residence No prehistoric or historic resources of any kind were discovered during the course of the investigation. Although the report found no definitive evidence of a forge or forging area, it is possible that Charles Mmor had a forge in the barn located immediately south of the house. The report recommended that a qualified archaeologist be present during grubbing and grading of the northeast quadrant of the property, near the barn slab. A mitigation measure has been included regwring the following. During grading and grubbing of the protect site, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actroities and take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The archaeologist will monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, with an emphasis in the area of the of the barn slab. The mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to a less than sigmficant level. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING• The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on October 21, 2003 (15 residents attended). Residents had questions about the square footage of the floor plans, prices, and perimeter wall heights and expressed concern that both plans were two-story designs Residents were primarily concerned about impact the two-story homes would make on their neighborhood. The applicant indicated that these issues would be mitigated by the large rear yard setbacks The proposed lots are larger than the surrounding neighborhood; hence, in all cases the proposed setbacks are sigrnficantly greater than City standards CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were matled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site Staff regwred the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice. c,~-,~ a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTTi 6554 AND DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • January 14, 2004 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, Development Review DRC2003-00358 and Minor Exception DRC2003-00726 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, uller City Planner BB:DG:mlg Attachments. Exhibit °A° - Site Utilization Map Exhibit °B° - Site Plan Exhibit °C° - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit °D° - Tentatve Tract Map • Exhibit "E° Exhibit °F° - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Bwlding Elevations Exhibit °G° - Floor Plan Exhibit "H° - Design Revew Committee Action Agenda dated November 4, 2003 Exhibit °I° - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00358 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2003-00726 • C\~L~~ OVEN =EAD IlTRJTY PLAN [[~~'~-~-~------- ..~.~...rr 0066_______ eweruarxuc ~_______ ra~rwar~ i ~ ________r~r~ LLLII _pq~~~µ~ d _ RPfAIO!! t _ fINHIPtff r _ OIMWAY ~RErOTILQATION MAP ~ --------..~~...a ~_______ooeriuar~oc ~____ __ra~nariaarioe 'rMB1YR LLLL --------rq}aryil! ZR ~~€ [[~[~~~~~]]]]]]` ~yy 4 ~z[9 ~Q ~' ~~~~ ~Z ~ ~ ~~ h ~~ p.o n ~E ~ ~ aai ~~ Qs W ~~ Z A1.02 ~ ~ - -- I I jig ~ ~i' ~ I o ---- ~ ~~ ~ ~;! ! i e, i j I , i ------ ~ ~ ~ . ~ o I i it l I ,~ ~ fly ~ _~ ~ .~~ ~t7_ ! 6 ~ ~ i ~ , ~ ~ s , ~ ~,- ~ \ I ~ ~ ! ~ I I ~ ~ ~ N \Tt\\f ~ ~ , I % I ~ ~ ` I d I ` ' I , ~` J ~ I -- ---- ~I ~ 1 s ~ ; ~ s I ~ I~ 6 m ~ \~ ~ ~ ~- s I ~-- ~ ~` ~ j I -n ~ I I ~ qe ~ ~ 1 • ~ ~ i i ^ cC i_ ~ ~;~ ~~ ~ I q ~~ .. 's Si -~ s s ~~ ~ • pi _ y _ `• ~ NeaMO3A COURT oer~am srre ww I I I I I I~ ~i f~i~l~~~"I PINE~VAVE ~~I 1 ,,,,,,~„„„„„, I I L , ~, N.P; DESIGN ANDENGINEER/NC ' c ~ E ~ ~ ~ I I g l 1 amp, Coem„p, G f11D g p T Nr ~I , ~ ,nn rcr~ r„~rt s.c „uvr r.~ nr„ C 9 1 d ~'°;,~,m, ~ ~ b~iC i `JNlN:~9N!`JN3 QNd N~JlS3Q ~~~~~d ~~ . ~. e1 Z I g I Z ~ I :I F 'I W ~I ~I ~I ~ Ntlld 9NIOV210 Tdflld30N00 .~~ E~ ep ~ ' OfLl6 WJ YONONVO(10 0lgNVtl CIlI6 q Qil`I avoa 3Nf13SVe 6800{ , P a ~r._ 4' (I~s llNn 9) ianoo vsowaaN ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ @ . d~ -- ~c~-~a~ c --- .~.. ~ivi~:'~.Sm 5.n': ~~~1~ Nb'ld `JNIOV2!`J lVflld30N00 v,.w e ff ~9e 0[Ll8 WJ YONOVIVOIIO OlANYtl ~ ~ E q Oi JNIX33Nl~N3` .0NV N~JIS30 aroa 3NM135Ve eB001 ~ , ~ a ~~. ~~LA~~~ (Hj5 llNfl 9) 121f100 tlS0YVi13H i ~ Q y g ~Qe g a D ~a J a w z 0 1 lOs~i e .i ~•~ ii e ~ g' ~' iI iSl9~ IEiI eel ~'SS ~~i @~~~ ~: .~ Y ~l ~l4 ~'a ~ {;~ ~f~ 1 ~~ 1 ~;~~€@ ~~~s~~~Bi ~eillle aeSiSseli §6~~il8i ~Illi; lii~~~ Il~r .. iilii iiiaa .i ;- ~9 .. ~~ 9 e ~d - - g ~ ~~~ g ! ~ ~• : ~~ ~ i S _ I '~ , iB ~~ .s a ~ S' ~~ --- E - d i@ ~~ .; iB i~ s ~ ~ e i I~~~ i ~EIEa Is i _ Q ~. tl~ I9 ~ ~ c! y -' d8 ~6 'EX~~-~ ~ ~!° a f a aR c~ ~i ~~ 9i ~ !'~ R~'l~fi ~ 9 i~~ !_ !_ i i ~ iii d ' ~ i °r i ~~ i ! j i ~, i~r 83~ ~~x9 ..i iR I is! :'s °s ~~! i 0! a i i ~ 1~ a •~ [e ~,, ~ p T~ ' i' ~t ~ ~I~l; ~l.l E~RMOSA COURT I 'ffi'r"'rveT"ac' "'"r IWl9Bvllw Rad I i RurLe Conmee{4G919l0 ~~~~ 6~ ~ ~ ££. O~Ia ~~'B #39i j~4~ iii i~°~ ~;i d~~ ~ s i~ ii ! ! a H~ ' g~~ ~ i !°~ h ~ ; PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING ~r~r/ a~~~-o.'ru~~i.~-vww~ .~.-.. ~ ......._..1~ .~ WIC ,~,~~~ ~n rJNI?I.~.~NIJN~QNVN~JIS.~Q irk '~~ ~ 'I~~ y,,,„`,, °u16Y~ ~o ~ ,e,,,,,,,p., urnoo vsoweaH ~A~'AS~I1IId ilili~ E1ii~ 8 ~ II II II II II II 3 .2t 6538 H ~ __ Ndl1'J1430-_-_-~ c ,6 SC _ AiL _ LL m ~J m ~` ~J ~ : =_ ~~ d p [ J O p #~ OJ c p ~ ONp ~ ~ O ~ Wed [ mf a ~ -o r p O j _~ u i " v i i ~ ' 0 i ~ i s + ~ 40~6~'4 `~ b ~~ . ! ! ! _ as ' ~ ~ e •i .__ G E` ~ ,. uwV~ o- _ o o~ ~ F-. e ~ ~ 1 , ' (# }- -{ y a rv6 ^~ O O LL ~ m LL (J~O f n W O O ~ q J F^ Z R pp= p p ~ ~'p J pHN J J xx N ~ JJII ~ ~~ m f l 1~ W S m A 0 5~ a W . 0 5 Q W 2 y"y V D W 2 J Q h f 2 .~.._. ~.> ~...,.._.. ~, ~ GL~ ~JNIX~~iVIJN~ t7Nd NfJIS.~O dA~AA~1~IId Vii, ~n ~~ril.L r~ ;llrl~~1!!f . P I ,p w I ~ i ® S . X 3 1 t 7 ~ t i Q t © ~ ~ ~; ~i 0 x~~~ ~~ , •D •D KLl6 YJ ~^J OP+wtl P.M ~IP~O W00[ NOI1V/313-~9K1300W 1tl110~VSOWl73H Q Il~~ o 3 ~l ~1 1 !~ !~t'I I I ~ ! 1 ~~ `11 t ~~ ~t ~~ tt 1'I tt t P! fl Iti li 4 t 1: II !i I~ ~ o 0 0000000 td~ ~t I~lPIt~~~~ !~ I sj t~' ! j P i I `°~i! ~!~ I~t ~P~ Ei I• ~~ ~ iE ii ~P ~ ttt fl tl :1 ! it :! tl o 0 00000000 t tE ~ tt tE ltfit~tilii( 1 P;'~ I j '~'~ i (t ~t ~t il'.I!t.. t !R !i ; X111 !1 t cl Ps I, E Pt !~ I! (t o©ooooo0 i e~ 3 i Ei ~ t ~~ •I `I PP; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ -~~ .uu -n urin ~rs .wo. avea w~. JNI?I~BNIJN~ QNV N~JIS9Q ~A~'AS~I~IId -3 E ~~ ~i wurn~~ I curt v~'~~w+ee rnM nw~3nuwro3a sAa..m~a umc sw~yran-n aaow 1Hf100 tlSONtl3H -O 3 s ~` ~i I16~ ~~~ a ~~'t ~ S' I I~!l~~ili~l li ~~ 1~ ~ t i t~ t i~ i~ it t t i jt i t iill I's ~ i~'li~I 6I lit !I id I li II !i ~! oa o 000000 $ i . ~ ~ la (~ ~I I I ' jE~,il;j(,~~,Ij I,tt t Ith+I~'! i,i 'j; it i; ~i (~ ~i !i ! j t ~:ietlt~illal~li~i oooomooooom it t~l~ i t; i; t ~i ~i I IIII 1! I! ~i mmm ,p 3 g 3~ ~~ •v .~ 3 is 5~ ~i ~' t~! li; 'I~ =n~llll ii e ~ :~ r t ~ ?! `JNIU.~,~NI`JN,~ ONd N~/S.~Q ~~~~~ F r----------- ,_ ~ m ~ ~~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ , t ~, \ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' Y ~~ ~ i ----+ ~ - ~~ ~~ C ,' 6~ T\ i .~.~a~, .mdwau-e~rn t3aow 1Hf10~VSONl13H s -.. Iw a., ,.,.y. mI •d ~I~1~ {pry. . 1 wu, ~a urw •are vio, m,m tww ,I'II~~7 d KLIf YJ ~J ^Pmtl ! ~ N `JNI?l.~.~NIJN~QN6'/N~~JIS.~Q ~I~~f,~~rNly'.~'~ f f 1tlf10 tl OWfwol : e M y I{I "I . ...~~~ "' ~ Ill~{II III ~ ~ NVld li.%)li [Q)KT34Y1 W ~~~ f ~ 11 /L~ ~cuss-tt G-~ '~f~' DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 15 p m Donald Granger November 4, 2003 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A residential subdivision of 6single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-041-57. Related Files DRC2003-00358. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358-PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design rewew of building elevations and detailed site plan for 6 single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer of Hermosa Avenue and Base Line Road -APN 1077-041-57 Related Fles• Tentatve Tract Map SUBTT16554. Background• The Minor House, a designated historic landmark, is presently located at the northeast corner of the project site Concurrent with the Development Review and Tentative Tract Map applications on the subtect site, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711 has been filed to relocate the Minor House to Lot 6 of the proposed subdivision. Desion Parameters The 1 68 acre site slopes gently to the south, with two mature trees on each side of the Minor House. Both trees will be preserved and incorporated into the rear yard of Lot 1 The existing cobble wall will be demolished on the Base Line Road frontage Portions of the cobble wall along the Hermosa Avenue frontage will be removed to allow the proposed cul-de-sac to take . access off Hermosa Avenue. The applicant is proposing a 6-lot infill subdiwsion, with house development Lot sizes for the proposed subdiwsion range from 9,400 square feet to 12,200 square feet, which are substantially larger than the subdmsion directly to the west The house product consists of two floor plans, ranging in square footage from 3,409 for Plan 1 to 3,600 for Plan 2 Both plans have roof plans that have strong variation in the roof plane, utilizing hip and gable elements A ledge stone base with a decorative foam molding cap on both plans provides a materials contrast from the tan stucco exterior Both floor plans have foam window surrounds and decorative cornices on all elevations. Portions of the elevations on both plans have been designed with wood siding and decorative wood braang, thereby incorporating a design element of the historic Minor House Staff believes that the design philosophy should not mimic the Craftsman style, because to do so would detract from the impact of this historic landmark Our design approach is to celebrate what is urnque about the Minor House by letting the landmark stand out from the neighborhood as it does today Each floor plan has been designed with ledge stone on the entire wall plane over the entryway, providing a rich focal point A detached, two-car garage matching the materials and Craftsmen architectural style of the Minor House will be constructed adtacent to the relocated Minor House on Lot 6 All lots will have decorative driveways and garage doors that complement the Craftsman architectural style of the detached garage for the Minor House The protect includes an application for a Minor Exception (DRC2003-00726) to allow a perimeter wall height of 8 feet along the northern boundary of the protect and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 for sound attenuation purposes The proposed perimeter wall along the Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue frontage will be decorative, consisting of two contrasting types ofsplit-face block, with ledge stone plasters at 10 feet on center • F-zctasg-~ ,.N,~ DRC COMMENTER SUBTT16554 & DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN & ENGINEERING November4, 2003 Page 2 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues• None -The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all mator issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The houses should be plotted with substantial front setback variation, in order to provide variation and visual interest in the streetscape All of the dwelling units are plotted at the same front yard setback Front yard setbacks should have substantial variation of+/- 5 feet, at a minimum as required by Development Code 2 Since the subdivision is only six lots, the colors of the stucco and ledge stone base should vary on each lot in order to prowde casual interest Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Plamm~g Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 No wood fenang is allowed Construct block walls between homes (i.e along interior side and rear property line) for permanence, durability, and design consistency 2 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 3 All interior private yard slopes are regwred to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 4 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone maybe used Stone veneers are not permitted Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that with Secondary Issue addressed, the Committee recommend approval to the Plamm~g Commission Design Review Committee Action: Members Present• Cnstine McPhail, Pam Stewart and Nancy Fong Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the protect and recommend approval with the following conditions The houses shall be plotted with substantial front setback variation, with a variation of +/- 5 feet, at a minimum Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval during the precise grade plan submitted for plan check F~Ct~B~-C~~l~ ~~~ .~ .;a- ' rnyaaanaw tacaawrpa Dnision ~soe~anaeo Inforr alien, ,.~~,, ;\~E~~~~p16~1GP ~ ,~ pQR 15 203 ENVIRONMENTAL ~~~111~~~ORMATION FORM ^"~ (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type a print clearly uslny inAc Use,the tab key fo move hom one I/ne tp the next p~ Applkatlon Numberfor the project ro xftkh this tam pertahtr 2.ot~3 - o o c f~c~ l ~ .J_~... ~_ I Please note thatlf is the respons/d7ityafthe epptTCant fa enstae Net ' wr7l~not~be- evadable to perform wnrh mqulred to proNde mtsstng Project Title: os~q Name d Address of project otmer(s); H ~ L c~ ~ogAL k Nu ~ sus,aN uu ~.tc., 160 `' r4V~ Name6Addressoldevelop~raprojectsponsor: ~~Mi< AS ~ABaV~ - conraaParsa,aAddress: "~.R~c ,4U pl~aWsve pes~4nr 8c r.,~ .. 'zl e l~ CoMME2cE i `~ t iNj~ Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (d ddferent from above); _ 5AP1 ~ ~4S t'{{pvOV ~ LJ •' Telephone Number q~`~. 869. 5~ Env4onmenfallnfoFonnl.doC Pace 10rs • z .• 2) Provide a set of cdorPhotographs that slrow representative views L the site Irom the rrorti, south east and News L and horn the sne /corn tire primary access points that serve the sne; and re significant features jr~ the site. lndude a maP show4+9location d each plrotogiap ti~ ~ws o/ 3) 13yrred Location (descdbej: ~ 00 -~~ ~+ H~MosA . ar_ av~ . sW co +) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addmonel sneer Hnecesmry): Q PN (p~.~. _ p4l - 5 s) Goss SlleArea (adsq, fzk ~. 6 g ~(e. . •c) Net Sne sea (total site she minus area dpublic streets a - - dedl~tio.,s): wopOSeO I.6 3 A c . 7J Qesame enYProPo~d general Plan emenc6nent orzane change wtddr would arras the p'ra)ed aria (almdr eddrtianal sneer d new: N~1~ pRc~POS~D BIN~I~ ~.4MIl Y un.~c>= n......... . ,._.. _.._... , ~~ldER-pt, pl.Arl A~/1fia,IDME.ni'~' -[FIE~>` IS -JO ~`c~ C.NA~rJCi,~. a+~b 1T w~u.. n~pl nYFE~-T ~'tE °~uWLOL1ND~r1~ tilEtE,HBu+Rttso~ _ 8) Include a description ofanpemdra which win be necessa the qty ofliancho Grcananga and other govvmmenta/agendas in aderto Iu0ylnrplerrrerd tire w 9) Describe the Pny~alse~ling ogre site asn exists belon~ the prated Indud/ng Inlormatlon on A~pography son stability, plaids and animals mature trees bans and roads, drainage courses and scenk aspects. Describe any existing sbvdures on site (mduding age and condition) and the use o1 tine sbuduros. Attach phdographs of significant ieaturos described. In addition, cite an sources airirom>atlon (le., geo%glcal andkr hydrologic studies, biotic and archedoglcelsurveys, balfic studies): 1H~ SIZE 6P-I~ I~StTE I I,~~ bC' ~T IS C~C~ Fb fist-'~ LMSt~ s~aCt lT t~ dat,`~ ~ I-o' pRof' ~Rolq fas~T~} T'o souT~l RuNNisC~ ,4P~T 3~1~ b" ~i.oNy H~MaG~ ,t+/~ituE "1t-1e SI"[E lS AvEe~cGst Y 2t-U4 ~BawE TF{2._ SCE ~~.• ~ ri~~ ~s No 4 P~ Ire C W l F3, Foun~C k Tt~_ c ~ ~t}CFf EnWronmentallnfoFortnl doe o_..,. ~ _... C • ~.~ `Q In/amation Indceted by an astedsk (y Is not required o/non-consbuetlon CUP's unless otherwise mquasted by afaH. •1) Provide a luAscale'(81/2 x 11) bopy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whkh bxiudes the protect site, and Indkate the site bourrdarles • SPettt}l.. ~lhKTs • >}N t--tats M~1r}IURe 1'~s ~ lF-A+~ A,.~ Roans URA~gc~~ • CovRS~s . eWO ~~N~ Ast~cTt (~uE= ~jcIST~~cv ~ltaZne~rt}~. Si1~6C~ ~MII,Y l-~btSS~ I,~/ DeTA4k Crr4RaL~t: IS ~fSlS~1h ftT t~R~.t- ~aaT • _ C~KF Ct a~ ll-t~ l.oT . ~~ t} tyas~ ~s t>v C4oo1~ A+sD F IJ 1Qf Desalbe the Avawn cu/drral and/or histadcel aspects of the site. Clte e6 sources o/trdormetion (books pubOshed spats and Orel /Jslory): No S ~c c kt.1oW-J Cul.Tut~4 aR Ht ORttl4 tie ec s ~ ND . U ~rl,C/~ r l / s~~ f 1J af7esalGe any mdse sources and thetrlevels that ~w affect the site (ekaaR. reedwey nolsa, etc) eraf how tl~ey wi proposed uses "R-1~ stT~ ~s of tteFMes(t #~rE-au~ hltt~, rtaT C~eNtwYT~ ~, M~Ui Nots~ ~lS ~ ~+4~,~ 'F-Rt,in dasF. ta.sz g f1J l>esalbe the proposed protect In detalX This should provide en adequate desatpfion d the site In terms of uldrrmte use that wID rasu/t from the proposed prefect lndreate 1/there are proposed phases for devebpmerr; the extent d development to Qatar with each phase, and the antklpated completion of each increment Attach addrt/alal sheet(s) necessary: ~ to 2 z S Zb I ~, ~ so. ~[ ~. si t~ ~~L~V~f FEO~SF~ f4P-E. FDs~e 1.44-Q e.. .-T T. ~ d.0 _ _ ,_ „ ~_ .. _ ~_~ ErnironmentallnfoFOrm1 doe oe„e o ..r o _ _ <+-ecr.c,.~s~y cvL•c.,y.~ ~eF~~o.+¢.c-~S ~~pee-c 13) Desrnbe the surroundrng p+oPerties lndudmg InforrnatFon on plants and animals and arty t~ddrral, hkrorlc~ or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of fend use (residentJal, commerdef, eta), IrdensJly otland use (orre-fam~y. ~~nt houses shops deparbnent stares eta) end scale ofdevebpmerrt (helgh~ lrorrfage, setback rearyarq, AvEtl l~ 14) Wr7l the I~Posed Pa9~ct drange the pattern, scale or drarader o1 the sungmding general area o1 the prgtect7 ~. w s N V ND'~.U l.0 W "l~~q. A ~~. I PRo~ 1.~~u, r~sr G~4-~b,~ Tim 4~F-t'[~.R-.s scams. a~ u+hRgeTeltz o~ °•, , ` `^""~. ~.~. ~ ~ F ova, ~W l,.tN~h1 ?HE C>;-s~'~k~sctt~a fs) Indicate the type o1 shad-teem and lwng-term ndse ro be generated, kiduding sowce arKl anarmt How wry these ndse levels affect ad)acerd properties and onsfte uses. Whatme~hods o/aoundproolirg are proposed9 CS~1STk~)[Ti~~~ W«,I,SE'Donc~ I.dl'0{lN n.[~ YCAb Tu:......,.-- ~uneT - •1s) lndrcete proposed removals end/arnplacemerds o/rrrahna arscenk trees OR S 17J Mdreate any bodies of water (Inducting domestic water supptiesJ Into which tire site drains: . -~ ~~ Ro -~ STEM ErMronmentallnfoForm t.doc C ~\ Paoe 4 0/ a ~ 2\ __ 18) tndkateezpectedamounto/waterusage. (Sea AttechmemAtorusageestlmates). For/w(herdanficagon,please tooted the Cucamonga County WaterDisbict at 987-?591. - a Reslden5al (gatrday) ~ p~k use (9~a1~ ~2~ b. CommerdaNnd. (gatrday/ac) N A Peak use (gat/min/ac) N~+4 ~ - 19) Indicate prepared method olsewage dlsposaL ^ Septk rank ~ serer. Nsepgc Tanks are pnmposed, attach pen;olabon tests. Ndisdlarge to a sanltarysewage system k pmposedlndkate expededdapysewagegeneretron (Sae AUachmentAWrusagees5mates). Fwlurtherdardicatkn,pkasecontad the Cucamonga County Water Dishict et 987-259f. a Resklen5al (9e4dayJ A Conunerdat/Indusbfal (!latrday/ac) N /}. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Numberofresldengalurrks~ tote renge o/parcel ~ minhnum kxsJza and maxirmrm kx stza: = 7.Z`7 z `{,zyZ I~1; S88 S. = !4,888 • _P,ARcf L ~ ° t ~. CBS S.E~ 4~ttached(kxlcate»deaarunttsaie.enmtortarsatawltts): iFi,L, U-~11TS 1~11~.t~ R~ fi91z SA{,~, 21) AnddpatadrangedsaleprkaeserxLtxrer~fs seta Prloe(s) i 5 00,0 0o m S 5zo oyo Rent (permai8r) S_ N/A ro i N A ~ spadrynum6erotbadroornsbyuntttypa: _ ~~UfZ ~3'~DpmoMS ,~Nb ONE ~ PST ~oM PEe VN1T 231 Indicate anbdpated household size by unit type: ~1c PEC-TIN ~ q. - S M~M$~t [~ U WT . EmUonmenlallnfoForml.doc 't • • • • 24) /ndlcate the expelled number of school chr7dren who will be residing wdhin tire pr%ck Conpd ti>e appropriate Scholl Disbicts as shown in Attachment e. Eiemerdary. b. JunbrMgh c Serrkrl8glr 5 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 251 Descnbe type d use(s) and mayor function(s) of ccrrunerdal, lrrdustrpl ar 6rstifutiorral uses 26) Total Boar area d carnnrercial, Mdustdal, orhrstitutiorraluses by ypa; 1~ Indcate hours of operation: • 28) Numberofempbyaes 29) Provide breakdotm olerr&Jpated/ob dassl8ca6ons; 7ndudfng wage and salary ranges, as ~1 as an brdicaUcn of fhe rate a~hlre for each dass/lica[ian (attadr additbrral street Ilnecesmry): 30) Estimation of the numberol xror)rers to be hired that currerrtiyreside in the ~' ~1) For commercial end Industdal uses ony, Indicate the source, type and amount of atr poJ/utkn emissions. (pap should be ventied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Disbic~ at (818) 572-6283): Toph. Maz4rwm Sh!!t Time olMaxlmum S7rHt ~,L23 EmtrorunentallMoFormt.doc Page a o/9 r~ne~ew ,,.. ~,,,.,. ....... . ........ ' '' - ALL PROJECTS ' 3~ Have the water sewer, !'ire, and Rood conbd agencies serving Mo project been cronfacted to determine Me1r a60rYy M • ~ provide adequate servke to the proposed projed7 I/so, please Indicate theirresponse. _Suaye~r At~C~ H~zMos,/ A~vue ~orz THE uTY 33) M the Mown hlstay ot'thls property, has Mere been any use. storage, ordkcharge dhazardous and/gr toxic materials? Examples olhazardous arxt/ortoxlc materials Include, but are trot Cmfted M PCB's; radioacWe substances; pestiddes and herbkJdes; luel~ a7~ salverds, and oMer Aamrnable fpulds and gases. Also note underground storage of any o/Me above. Please bst the materials and desrnLe Melrose, storage, arrdkrd~scharge on Me property, es ne/ es Me dates d use, nkpwrr. _(SO-.SE of ZHOS~ acT~v~Tt~s '~o~Nt~ IN TN~s t'~o~t+~'Y 34) t,Yin the proposed project nrvoMe Me temporary orrong-ram, use, stovage or dlsMage anaza%us andror toxic • materials, Indudurg but not UiNted m Moss exarr~les nsted above? nyes, provide an nrverday ofall such materials to be used and proposed method ddlsposa!- Ina lacatlan dsuch uses along with Me storage and sh/wnent areas, shaAbe shown end labeled on ti,e eppGcation plans. 7NE ~~04+EP ~K-0T£r;"~' WIU. N6'~ Iuvt)w~ THe US*G 0~ ,4.u`~ l Hereby certify Mar Me statements fumished ebare and in Me attacdred exhlWts present data and lnlormation raqubed Ier adequate evafuatlon dMls pro/ed ro Me best olmyatxTity, Marble /ads, statemerrls and eonprese<dedarattue andoared tot he best o/mylcawledga and belie/. I furMerurMerstand that addrtional inlom~ation ma requbad to be submfCed beWre an adequate evaluation can be made by the Clry d Rarxia Cucamanoa. Dale: O~- ~ (5 ~0~ Signature: rrge: rr/~%>~i C,\L~L 2~ ErMronmenfallnfoFonnl doe Page 7 or 9 r.e~.w .._ ~.,~ .................. i i • Water Usage Average use per day ResidenUai Single Family ApUCorxlo ATTACHMENT A l~ 600 gaVday 400 gaUday CommerclaUlndustrlal General and Regional Commerdal Neighborhood Commercial General industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 20 Sewer Flows Residential Single Famffy ApUCondos CommerciaUlnduslrial General Commercial Neighbortaod Commerdal General Industrial Heavy bndustrial Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Phan, 6100 EnNmm~entalln toFam 1.doc 3,000 gaUday/ac 1.500 gaUday/aC 2,500 gaVday/ac 3,000 gaVday/ac 270 gaUday 200 gaUday 2,000 gaVday/ac 1.000 gaUday/ac 1,500 gal/daylac 3,000 gaUday/ac C,\~~~ 2s Pega a wa '~ GeafM ,... crnnrv» ~.no a• j • ATTACHMENT B Contact the schod district for your area fa amount and payment of school foes; Elementary School Districts Alfa Loma 9350 Base tine Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0768 Central 10601 Church Street, Sure 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 9119-8541 Cupmonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chatfey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontarb, CA 91782 (909) 988-8511 ~J Em4ronmenialln/oFam 1.doc Paae 8 of 9 fro>IM nn SA7/7M'~ i.nn n„ i • !~~ 210000 FEE7;(5) 117°~°( 3 /F/ GUASTI QUADRANGLE CALIFORNIA 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) SE/4 ONTARIO IS' OUADRANOLE~- :+~ h u l .~ h 3 0 0 v a v c,~.,~- 2a City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II I \PLANNING\Donald\Cega\DRC2003-003581S doc BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2003-00358 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 and Landmark Alteration Permd DRC200300711 and Minor Exception DRC2003-00726 3. Description of Protect: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A residential subdivision of 6 single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwellrg units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Base Lme Road and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-041-57 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 6single-family lots on 1 68 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer of Hermosa Avenue and Base Line Road -APN 1077-041-57. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Pmewave Design and Engineering 21017 Commerce Pointe Drive Walnut, CA 91789 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unds per gross acre) 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per gross acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site presently is the location of the Minor House, a local historic landmark, that is proposed to be relocated to one of the lots created by the new subdivision The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and west To the west is asingle-family subdivision; to the north, across Base Line Road, is amulti-family condominwm development, and to the south is a single-faintly subdmsion To the east, across Hermosa Avenue, is an electrical substation 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: • Donald Granger, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None C ~`~1.. ~L. 2~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-00358 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx - Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model • C ~~,~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' or °Less Than Significant Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the foilowmg pages. (/) Aesthetics () Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services () Utilities/Service Syster /) Agricultural Resources /) Cultural Resources /) Hydrology/Water Quality j Energy and Mineral Resources /) Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significa (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning () Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this mitial evaluation I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared. (/) 1 find that although the proposed project could have a signiflcant effect on the envlronment, there will not be a signiflcant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I fmd that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a °potentially significant impact' or °potentially significant unless mitigated° impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed m an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but R must analyze only the effects that remam to be addressed () I fmd that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred. Prepared By Date O 03 Reviewed By ' ~ Date ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Len 711m1 Slpnifiwe Len Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pae~ely 9pmficent wN, Mitipetlan rneo $IpNrICel1I No I Into retetl 1 ecl I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime wows in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site Although Hermosa Avenue is within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15, the proposed subdivision will not obstruct the north-south view corridor on Hermosa Avenue. All dwelling units will either meet or exceed all building and streetscape setbacks. Additionally, the goal of Citys General Plan is to "frame' view corridors as new development occurs The proposed homes will not obstruct the north-south view corridor of Hermosa Avenue b) The protect site contains a mature, large Mulberry tree on the east side of the historic Minor House, however, this lone tree is not designated as a scenic resource by the Citys General Plan The protect site contains no other scenic resources There are no state scenic highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The applicant is proposing a 6 lot single-family subdivision at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and west. To west is asingle-family subdivision, to the north, across Base Line Road, is amulti-family condominium development, and to the south is asingle-family subdivision. The site presently is the location of the historic Minor House, an example of Craftsmen/Bungalow architecture The Minor House will be preserved and relocated to one of the lots created by the new subdivision The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently mostly vacant The design and placement of Tight fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant c,~.,~ 32 Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 ~ m., sorvricam ~. Issues and Supporting Information Sources. ~ m ~ 0 M,`""" 9anm T181 s~.ram rw ~ ~~ ~~ i i 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or () () () (/) a W illiamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes rn the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The applicant is proposing a 6 lot single-family subdvision at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue. The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and west To west is a single-family subdvision, to the north, across Base Line Road, is amulti-family condominwm development, and to the south is asingle-family subdmsion. To the east, across Hermosa Avenue, is an electrical substation The Minor House will be relocated to one of the lots created by the new subdivision There are approximately 1,300 acres of prime farmlands, unique farmland or farmland of statewide importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Counal. The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the Crty c) The applicant is proposing a 6 lot single-family subdivision at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and west To west is asingle-family subdivision, to the north, across Base Line Road, is amulti-family condominwm development, and to the south is a single-family subdivision The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 4 miles southwest of the prolect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the prolect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Leaa 7Mn soMant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources. 5°'°"'~"Y y~acarn w"" mmoasa, '"'" soNrwanL ra ~ m~ t~ ~ i b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation? c) Result m a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any cntena pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () () concentrations? e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments• a) As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development wrfl contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a signrficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the Cary Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain m the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry m the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equpment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction actmties are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existrng air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are regwred to be assessed by the South Coast Av Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintalned In good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. r-1 U ~-~ LJ ~J C,~~,L ~y • Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 ~ rnm, aa~em ie~ Issues and Supportin Information Sources P01Bn1B0i' `"'" '""' g Sipnfwun ALbp•oon Siperficanl No 1 Ba Irkn ratetl 1 1 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to Clty denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures Imposed by the SCA~MD as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCA~MD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material In accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (I.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. . 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~, ~ SlpNfiwrt um Issues and Supporting Information Sources. So,~"~;,~, ~ ~~, s,~rKem ,~ ~ ~o ,~a i i Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM10 would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant il they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less than significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in sigmficant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates m Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less than sigmficant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR . identified the citywide increase m operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a sigmficant and adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prolect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care faalities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic faalities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create sigmficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The prolect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor homes on the adjoining properties to the north, south, and west. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than- significantlevels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are • anticipated Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 ~ n,d, sa.ficam Lae Issues and Supportin Information Sources PotBntlpA~' "'"' "'°" g : Sipruficenl ALOpaoon SlpnficeM No 1 Inco rated 1 I 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro~ech a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S. Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limded to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlfe corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sRes~ e) Conflict with any local pollees or ordinances () (/) () () protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? i) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Camments• a) The protect site is located in an area developed with similar residential uses The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and west To west is a single-family subdivision, to the north, across Base Line Road, is a mufti-family condominium development, and to the south is asingle-family subdivision To the east, across Hermosa Avenue, is an electrical substation According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources C-,~-.~-- 3`~- Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Len,nao awmam ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources. 's;~i ~ M~ ~ ~, s~ ~m ro d) The surrounding area has been or ~s being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are two mature trees on both sides of the Minor House, a Frwtless Mulberry and an Avocado Both trees were evaluated by a certified arborist (Rede, May 23, 2003), and both trees were found to be healthy Both trees would regwre pruning prior to mowng the historic Minor House. The Avocado tree does not meet the criteria for a heritage tree. The proposed protect would requve removal of both trees for grading cut The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) The Fruitless Mulberry tree shall be saved by transplanting or replaced with the largest nursery grown specimen available to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The tree shall be planted on the lot with the relocated Minor House. The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Pian, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect~ a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () (/) ( ) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5 b) Cause a substantial adverse change m the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Dvectly or indvectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has been identified as a °Historic Resource° because it contains the Minor House, a designated local Historic Landmark, per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation). The Minor House is an excellent example of a 1920's Craftsmen Style Grove House The Minor House is the last remaining Craftsman Style Grove House in Rancho Cucamonga that has not been altered This house was owned by Charles J Minor, who was both a citrus grower and possibly the last blacksmith within Cucamonga area. A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared (Archaeological Associates/Eilar Associates, July 7, 2003) The study concluded that, with the exception of the Minor House, there are no other historic sites on the subtect property Concurrent with the Development Review application, a Landmark Alteration Permit is being processed that wdl permit the Minor House to be preserved and relocated to one of the lots created by the new subdivision The impact is considered less than significant b) The protect site has been identified as a "Historic Resource° because it contains the Minor House, a designated local Historic Landmark, per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) A Cultural Resources Assessment (Archaeological Associates/Eilar Associates, July 7, 2003) was pertormed C,\L,L ~ C Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 L•as RI•n 9profi°Bnt laa Issues and Supportin Information Sources' '°'°""etlj' "'"" '"°" g SipNfic•m MNpeom Slpnfieeril No I acl Intro ted I I to Identify all potentially significant cultural and archaeological resources. The report reviewed historical records, literature, and archives. Afield reconnaissance survey was conducted by walking a serves of parallel transects across the protect site and meandering transects around the residence. No prehistoric or historic resources of any kind were discovered during the course of the investigation. Although the report found no definitive evidence of a forge or forging area, it is possible that Charles Minor had a forge in the barn located immediately south of the house. The report recommended that a qualified archaeologist be present during grubbing and grading of the northeast quadrant of the property, near the bam slab The There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been Inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1) During grading and grubbing of the project site, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The • archaeologist will monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, with an emphasis in the area of the of the barn slab. Also, with the assistance of the archaeologist, the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact Interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish tts archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented C \~~\~ J Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 ~~ SpNfitOm leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources. soN ~~ wUU~ ~ s~~r~c r~o i ~~ ~~~ ~ i 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Immediately divert construction and notfly the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is m an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted as a result of weed abatement No known religious or sacred sties exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, rntury, or death mvolwng i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Algwst-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) m) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? rv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result m substantial soil erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsod~ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse u C C ,~~L. y~ • Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Lett 7Ten SloNnmrn Leta Issues and Supporting Information Sources. ~,9ry "~, a,,,~~t~, s, rb d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Budding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Comments: a) The inferred Red Hill Fault passes through the site, hence, the subiect property ~s wthin a low ground rupture potential zone, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR This buried/uncertain segment connects the Red Hill Fault wdh the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp. According to the General Plan, subsurtace explorations for the fault found no evidence of tts existence, therefore, speaal studies are only regwred for critical facddies. Single-family residences do not meet the defindion of a critical facddy. The Red Hill Fault passes within 1 8 miles west of the stte, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.1 miles northwest of the protect sde These faults are both capable of producing M„ 6.0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectNely. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producng up to Mt, 7 5 earthquakes is 8 miles northeastery of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 10 miles northeasterly of the stte. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signdicant. b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subiect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction acbwties may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels• 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAaMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~a emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 ~ ~, slvNn~.m Lns, Issues and Supporting Information Sources soNfi°~'~,,; nu,",r'"' petlan 7181 Sipnfioenl No I M Irim le0 I I withdraw water from the existing aqurfer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic and or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types onsite consist of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated c) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of sods are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam. Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3 These soils are typically have gentle slopes, ranging from 0-2 percent No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. b) HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the enwronment~ c) Emd hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a sigmficant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () ( ) () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public avport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? f) For a protect within the wcimty of a private airstrip, () ( ) () (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere wdh () ( ) () (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a sigmficant risk of () ( ) () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wddlands~ • r~ U Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 ~~ s~a~ficam leaa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources '°'~1b81y `"'0i '"'" pp g . SIQNficarll Mroyaaon Sipnficant No I act Inco rateC I I Comments: a) The protect is asingle-family subdivision and will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to level less than significant. No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect is asingle-family subdivision and does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Pian to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no public schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site. The nearest private school, aday care facility on Base Line Road, is located approximately .15 miles east of the site Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 3.25 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Mufti-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 uas 7nen sicr+man ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~° ~',,,'r ~ ~~, s,o~ „ ,,, ~ ~ ~~ i i 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste () () () (/) discharge regwrements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () (/) () ( ) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficd in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permRs have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-sde~ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water qualms () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood fiows~ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death mvolwng flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements The proposed protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area i • • Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 ~Tn., s~nmm ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. PP 9 P°'"i0a1h s~pNeoam `""' ~.unoaeon '"°" soNno.m oa designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development atywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented. 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be Integrated Into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bulding and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect design includes landscaping to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the prolect wdl not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant. d) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Offical and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not resuR in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the as a result of amount of new bwldmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing stone drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site wtll not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, it is regwred to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented i 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WIMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain ~~~~ ~{ Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 ~~ apr.bcem ~, Issues and Supporting Information Sources. so ~ ~ ~«~ sw~ ~ system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shat) Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 3) Prior to Issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) If residential include this sentence The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-5. No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debrs dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drams as shown in General Plan Exhibd V-6. In 2003, the City completed construction of a storm dram in Hermosa Avenue, including uphill and downhill of the prolect site The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect sde, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance with City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. l.flhm l1SE AND PLAf~CJNts Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established commumty~ () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan u • C ~~.~L ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Lea 7hm SI9Nficem Len Issues and Supportin Information Sources• P°'~ibB°Y `""' '"°" g Sipnfiwlt MnipaCan 9pnficant No I ecl In:o tetl I I Comments: a) The site is located within an area characterized bysingle-family homes. The applicant is proposing a 6 lot single-family subdivision at the southwest corner of Base Llne Road and Hermosa Avenue The 1 68 acre site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south and west. To west is asingle-famlly subdivision, to the north, across Base Line Road, is amulti-famlly condominium development, and to the south is a single-family subdivision To the east, across Hermosa Avenue, is an electrical substation. This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding single-family lots to the west and south. The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). At 3 57 units per acre, the proposed protect is consistent with allowable density range as specified in the General Pian. The protect does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. \_J c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the poect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • 11. NOISE. Would the protect result in. a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels () (/) () ( ) in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels C,~..~L y`~- Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 ~ rte, s~omn~.rn i~ Issues and Su ortin Information So ' Pma~d'r "'"" '^B" pp g urces SiprufiwU MNpetlm $IQfYfiGlll No I Irlco rate0 I I c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? d) A substantlal temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels exlstmg without the protect? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out At build-out, the protect site will be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA within 199 feet of Hermosa Avenue, and greater than 60dBA within 368 feet of Base Line Road. Accordingly, an acoustical analysis (Filar Associates, July 3, 2003) of the protect site was completed, and the study concluded that all lots would be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA The exterior noise level can to mitigated to less than 60 dBA with a 6- to 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed around the perimeter of the protect's boundary The study concluded that with standard construction requirements of the California Building Code, the proposed houses will meet the interior noise level requirements of 45 dBA or less The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along the northern boundary of the subdivision, fronting Base Line Road, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1. A 6-foot high masonry wall shall constructed along the western and southern boundary of the subdivision, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 6. 2) The plans submitted for plan check shall have STC 28 dual-Insulated windows and STC 33 solid core exterior wood doors with seals. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 ~~ soNfimm ,... Issues and Supporting Information Sources °oten°etly SipNfieem win, Mitlpetlan 7181 Siprvficenl No I ecl IMO ,steE I azt 1 may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundbome vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATIONAPIDHOUSQJG Would the prolect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c.~,~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 ~~ SiOmflcam Lma Issues and Supporting Information Sources. ~,~„ ~y M~~ ~, ~"'°~,,, „~ ~ ~ ~~~o ~~~ ~ ~ i c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction actwities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site is the location of the Minor House that will be preserved and relocated to one of the lots created by the new subdwision. The prolect site contains no other existing housing units No adverse impact expected. c) See response to a) No adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services. a) Fve protection? O U U (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1-mile from the prolect site The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not regwred as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school distracts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Distracts are not considered significant C~~\~ SD • Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 ~~~ s~oNfioam Im Issues and Supporting Information Sources '°'a"°°"Y """ T"'^ 9prvficatt ALtipetlm Si9rvficerlt No 1 Into teE I 1 d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than 1-mile from the protect site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing factlities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. • e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilties. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victona Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 74. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilely would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located less than 1 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above • C,~~~~ s` Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 ~~ ~~~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 5°'~,entla°r~,,,, a ~""" OeBm '"°" siWncem W I en Ir,co teE ~ ~ 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect. a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congesbon at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g., fans equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted pollees, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g ,bus tumours, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect wdl not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street- frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate approximately 6 two-way peak hour trips (Rancho Cucamonga Trip Generation Methodology), which is less 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requmng a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are antiepated • • Initial Study for DRC2003-00356 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 ~.m~ ~m+raem leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources s ~ cd M1';f"" petlm """ am+ream Ho ~ i~ ~ i i c) Located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontano Avport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the Bile. The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacty. No impacts are anticipated • u g) There are bus stops at this intersection and a bike lane on Base Line Road. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Qualdy Control Board? b) Requue or result in the construction of new water or () () ( ) (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Regwre or result in the construction of new storm () () ( ) (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause sigmficant environmental effects. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () ( ) (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () ( ) (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that rt has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () ( ) (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () ( ) (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the C,~L~I~ S3 Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Lav Then sP.rc.m ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP fd P°'°`"B0'' SlpNficarlt `""' Miup9GOn ^"" SlpYficerlt No I Imo ~ I I requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water QualRy Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The prolect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer, prior to issuance of grading permRs The impact is not considered significant u d) The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. • Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are regwred for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling unds, 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use prolect including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other prolect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit prolect, and 8) any prolect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is required when 1) a prolect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a prolect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision The City has determined that the prolect does not meet one of the regwrements, therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required The prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this prolect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment . plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated \_ J `.J Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 r~~ SOni°c°m i.wa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PatBnL81ry `"'" "'°" pp g Sipruficenl Mi°q°°on SipNfic°N No I Izro ret~ 1 I f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This protect complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (.7 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory't b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Pian was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the Ciry adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Secticn 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space C ~~~L. s5 Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 ~.nm, so,+n~ w, Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~r~m M. ~~ s~ rw i i~ ~~~ i i Wdh these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activdies were completed The Initial Study identfied potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negatroe Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Diwsion offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply). (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Envvonmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certdied January 4, 1989) (/) Acoustical Analysis Report, Eilar Associates (dated July 3, 2003) (/) Cultural Resources Assessment, Archaeological Associates (dated July 7, 2003) (/) Arborist Report, Jonathan Rede, Tree °R° Us (dated May 23, 2003) ~, ~~. sc~ i Initial Study for DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature ~~ `` t _ Date ~b . 2 ~- O Pnnt Name and Title .SLt~~Ct2l ~ll.~-i ~ V r`~ /~~"~~~~' I ~plannmg~final~cegaMstudy pt2-4-03rev doc C ~~L~L ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 and Development Review DRC2003-00358 Public Review Period Closes: January 14, 2004 Project Name. Hermosa Court Prolect Applicant: Pinewave Design and Engineering Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest comer of Base Lme Road and Hermosa Avenue - APN 1077-041-57 Project Description: A residential subdmsion and the design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan of 6 single-family lots, including the relocation of a historic house, on 1 68 acre of land m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Related Files Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00088 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477.2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod. January 14, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By C ~~~~ ~ RESOLUTION NO 0402 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. SUBTT16554, A SUBDIVISION OF 1.68 ACRES OF LAND INTO6 NUMBERED LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 1077-041-57 A. Recitals. 1. Pinewave Design and Engineering filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No SUBTT16554, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic hearing on January 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a. The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Base Ltne Road and Hermosa Avenue with a street frontage of approximately 216 feet on Base Line Road and approximately 315 feet on Hermosa Avenue and presently contains the Minor House, a designated Historical Landmark, and b. The property to the north of the subject site across Base Line Road is developed with condominiums, the properties to the south and west are developed with single-family homes, and the property to the east is developed with an electrical substation; and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, v~nll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the viamty, and d. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on October21, 2003, attended by 15 residents, to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain their feedback, and e The project, in contunction with Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711, will relocate the historic Minor House to Lot 6 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 and become part of a neighborhood, a desirable goal, and C ~\L~~ S°1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 2 f. All lots of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 meet or exceed the Banc Development Standards for area, width, frontage, depth, and budding setbacks 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable m~ury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4 Based upon the facts and rnfonnation contamed in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contamed in said Mitigated Negatve Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contamed m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning C~~1..,~~. (00 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0402 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING . January 14, 2004 Page 3 Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subfect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 2) Where freestanding penmeter walls meet a slope condition, the penmeter wall shall be placed at the top of slope, behind a 1-foot bench 3) All conditions of approval per Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No 04-01 for Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711 . shall apply Engineering Division 1) Protect existing traffic signing and striping on Base Line Road Protect or modify ewstmg traffic signal equipment in Base Line Road Protect ewstmg traffic signal egwpment, signing, and striping on Hermosa Protect ewstmg R26 signs on Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue or replace as required Revise ewstmg improvement plans for Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue as needed to show new improvements. 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicationsand electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Hermosa Avenue shall be paid to the City, pnor to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the southerly property boundary to the northerly terminus pole just south of Base Line Road. 3) The existing driveways on Base Lme Road and Hermosa Avenue shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter and sidewalk 4) The existing overhead electrical and telecommunication service lines to the existing house shall be undergrounded and the utility pole removed • 5) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the conceptual grading plan C~V_.\L l~l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0402 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 . Page 4 6) The final map for Tract 16554 shall be approved, pnor to the issuance of building permits 7) The follovnng shall appy for dnveways downhill from street 6 feet at 6 percent (14 percent maximum between grade breaks) and 18feetflat in front of garage (could be 13 feet at 5 percent to flow Ime, then up 5 feet at 2 percent). 8) All improvements vv~thin public nghts-of--way shall be constructed per public improvement plans v~nth a 2 percent slope within the nght-of-way from the property line to the top of the curb. 9) Install private landscaping and imgation systems in the parkways of comer Lots 1 and 6 along Hermosa Avenue pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City (Side-on to Artenal streets, where rear-on would be Landscape Maintenance Distnct) 10) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related admirnstrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided • to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division v~nthin 60 days folloHnng the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 11) Construct concrete 'V' gutter along Lots 4, 5, and 6 Environmental Mibaation !Lr Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. 2) Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff C~~L.~L l~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • January 14, 2004 Page 5 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the folloHnng prowsions• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to mimmrze the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods a • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time ofyearof construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds p e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all madive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible C~~L,~ (~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0402 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 6 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be requred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane ~nnndows and weather stnpping. Biological Resoun~s 1) The Frwtless Mulberry tree shall be saved by transplanting or replaaad ~nnth the largest nursery grown speamen available to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The tree shall be planted on the lot with the relocated Minor House Cultural Resources • 1) Dunng grading and grubbing of the prolect site, the developerNnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and take • appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study The archaeologist wdl monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, with an emphasis in the area of the bam slab. Also, with the assistanaa of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga v~nll. • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, folloHnng appropnate CEQA gwde6nes • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, • with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 7 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field surveyof the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speGfic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological momtonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance vinth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions Hydrology 1) Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best c,~.,~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 6 Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or pawng perrnits, the applicant shall submd to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply vnth obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along the northern boundary of the subdivision, fronting Base Line Road, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 A 6-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the western and southern boundary of the subdivision, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 6 2) The plans submitted for plan check shall have STC 28 dual-insulated windows and STC 33 solid core extenor wood doors with seals 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then consUucUon activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance ninth above noise standards or halted 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the C ~~L.~~ (elP PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 SUBTT16554 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING . January 14, 2004 Page 9 construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Mauas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wnt AYES• COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• e ,~,~ c~- City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use rn implementing the mitigation measures identified rn the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. Thrs program has been prepared rn complrance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -Thrs MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure complrance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained rn the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of complrance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. Thrs procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when complrance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the Crty Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action rs taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure complrance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the Crty rn performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure rdentrfred in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. Thrs procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when complrance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Division) • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C~V-~L ~ Mitigation Monitoring Program • DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 Page 2 2. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Citystaff's ~s needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 3. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 4. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 5. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 6. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 7. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 8. In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The momtoring/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: DRC2003-00358 and SUBTT16554 Applicant: _ Pinewave Design and Engineering Initial Study Prepared by: _ Donald Granger Date: May 5. 2003 r .. _ ~, All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational y4 emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venhcation Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAOMD as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Rewew of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C throw h seedin and waterin Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 . 1 0~ • .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large .. , areas to erosion over extended eriods of time CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of CE C Rewew of Plans A/C ti4 work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound CE C Rewew of Plans A 4 en ineenn radices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public CE C Dunng A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations durng high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with i g0/CE C Dunng A 4 Rule 403 re wrements Construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other CE C Review of Plans A 4 swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Ruie 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Review of Plans A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high effidency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 2 of 7 n iLL r' r .. , ., .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C yq regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological , , _ ', , , ~; ~r~ The Frwtless Mulberry tree shall be saved by CP C Rewew of A/C yq transplanting or replaced with the largest nursery grown Plans/During specimen available to the satisfaction of the City Construction Planner The tree shall be planted on the lot with the relocated Minor House. < Cultural Resources ~ i.el .~ , _ ~ ~ ~"r - ~_ ^ti k`ttE j p M . <<~~w~fi^~. n{ ~ ~fR 41P j~' 2'~14XnAeMra..[`rY.. 4~4 1 During grading and grubbing of the prolect site, the CPBO ~ C Rewew of A/C y4 developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to momtor Plans/During construction activities and take appropriate measures to Construction protect or preserve them for study The archaeologist will monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, with an emphasis in the area of the barn slab Also, with the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modrfication Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines 3 0 r it 1 -N • -, • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP -• C Review of A/D .. documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report 3/4 proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report q submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils ' . ;. - _ ~ ` ,, - _ `_ . .° s r,~ ~ . ""' - .~ , f- _ „ The site shall be treated with water or other sotl BO/CE C Durng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance wdh SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4of7 l' 1~ L .. .. -. .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During q q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Durng q q RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 86 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~. ± `~ ' ` ;~, >"~°~y"y:~~~~" .. J, .3""~~`kv2'N7"!"1`. k~~~~ "`~; ~' i; .w ar ,x~„ ,~ ~~ xe€t6 ~ ~& ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 x;~ - ~-~ ~;,<t„~,.. ~ `~ " ~ -... x ~ i ,d~ aA~' .. i~mS''lY 's&`k Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pils, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C y4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shali identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit • 5 a~ • r- i r_ .-.a. l.r • • - .. ... .. ~ _ ~, ~ Noise ~ 9, ~.° A ~`~~~~y, 4rLny'lK,ihxi~ i4 <°~ 'm^w~ b'` "` ''''`;" ~ ~., ~ {* ~y„ka~~-,~.,,~-~e~~, ~ µ An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along BO/CP C/D Review of A/C/D ~l-`~.-~ v.i.... the northern boundary of the subdivision, fronting Base Plans/Dunng 2,3 Line Road, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 A Construction 6-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the western and southern boundary of the subdivsion, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 6 The plans submitted for plan check shall have STC 28 BO/CP C/D Review of A/C/D dual-insulated windows and STC 33 solid core exterior 2,3 wood doors with seals Plans/Dunng Construction Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During q hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During p standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning D~wsion Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A q as possible in first phase Construction 6of7 • .. -• .. Haul truck detlverles shall not take place between the POGO C Durtng A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m on weekdays, constructlon tncluding Saturday, or at any tlme on Sunday or a national holiday Addttlonally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the constructlon site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mltlgatton plan denoting any constructlon traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings nKey to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ .: " ~'' _~ ~.-,, CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or designee BO - Bwlding Offiaal or designee PO -Police Captain or designee FC - Fve Chief or designee - Monitoring Frequency A -With Each New Development B - Pnor To Construction C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion E -Operating u, a ~ , ;Method of Verlficallon„~y' ' ~ '~ A - On-site Inspection _w B -Other Agency Pertnd /Approval C -Plan Check D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) _, ~Sarictions`,,_`; ;' ~~, 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 - W rthhold Grading or Building Permit 3 - W rthhold Certificate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation F "r I \planning\flnal\cegaMmchklst-revs-03final doc • 7 O~ •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 SUBJECT: 6-LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, as agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ciry, rts agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Rs sole discretion, participate at its own expense rn the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentatve tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Drwsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Comole6on Dete ~~ ~~- -/~- -~-~- -/~- SC-10-03 ~ , ,1 \~\ Protect No SUBTT16554 Completion Dete D. 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with ail sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~~_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/,_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits. 8 The prolect contains a designated Historical Landmark The site shall be developed and ~~_ maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No DRC2003-00711 Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the prolect perimeter If a double wall ~_/ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining ~ property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~~ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 OS 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~J_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent vrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~~_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 6 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy SC-10-03 ~ \\, \~ Protect No SUBTT76554 Completion Date 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Dmsion 7 Landscaping and vrtgation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8 Atl walls shall be provided with decoratroe treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Drotsion. E. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. • 3 Mitigation measures are regwred for the prolect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the Crtyto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~. ~~. ~-/. SC-10-03 3 ~ \~ \~ ,~/a H. J. Prote ct No SUBTTi6554 Completion Date c. Floor Plan; d Cetltng and Roof Framing Plan, • e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams water and waste , diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. ~~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet° signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~_/ the Ctty pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requved for fencing and/or walls. ___/~ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ___/~_ contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect fde number (i e , SUBTT16554). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations rn effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division for avadabddy of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not Itmded to• City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwldmg and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~ recordation and pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwldtng Code for regwred occupancy separations ~_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~~_ Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be to substantial conformance with the approved grading plan SC-10-03 q C \\~\~ ~O Protect No SUBTT76554 Comoletion Dete u 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall lie prepared, stamped, and signed by a Callfomia registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, streettrees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Base Line Road 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets Base Line Road. 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty. L. Street Improvements All public Improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to • Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Treil Median Island Blke Trell Other Base Line Road x x x x Hermosa Avenue x x x x "A" Street x x x x x x Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil ~~- ~-~_ _/~- ~~- ___/~- __J-~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~- -~_~. -/~_ SC-10-03 5 C \~\~ ~` Prgect No SUBTT16554 Completion Date 4 Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnorto • final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ~~_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and ~~_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal condut with pull boxes shall be installed wcth any new construction or reconstruction ~~_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wuing Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied. e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Ccty ~_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~~_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permts are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and pawng, which shall be refunded . upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~~_ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the Citys street tree program. SC-10-03 C,~~ L. ~Z 6 Project No SUBTT7&554 Comoletion Date 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adfust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name 9otanleal Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size' f]ry Base Line Road 3~ Foreground tree Magnolia grandiflora NCN 30' o c 15-gal Fdl P A 8' or greater 'Samuel Sommer formal in P A less than 8' or Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' o c 15-gal under power lines 'St Mary' formal Background tree ' Liquidambar Amencan Sweet Gum 8' 25' o c 15-gal P A 8 or greater sryraciflua informal Accent tree l~gerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybnd- 3' 20' o c 24' 'Natchez' white box Hermosa Avenue 8' or greater p a Platanus acenflola London Place tree 8' 30' o c 15-gal 8' or greater p a Lagerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybnd- 3' 20' o c 24' under utilities 'Catawba' multi dark purple box Smaller than 8' p a Lagersteomia indica Crape Myrtle Hybnd- 3' 20' o c 24' no utilities 'Catawba' standard dark purple box •Use Sycamores as on-site background tree within inadequate room necessitates Crape Myrtles Cul-de-sac provide Select tree from the street name approved Street Tree List for Rancho Cucamonga 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees. 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Cary inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient defiaencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Tines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred ~. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public W orks Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance SC-10-03 7 C \\~\l -/~- ~~. ~-~_ N. O. P Prge ot NO SUBTT76554 Completion Dete of budding permits, whichever occurs ftrst. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed Into the Landscape Maintenance District Base Line Road 2. Public landscape areas are requtred to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or _/~_ other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or tssuance of bwldtng permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4 All requtred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~~_ developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/~_ Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~_J_ approval or the tssuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requtred by the Ctty Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the ~J property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm dram pipe measured _/~_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage to a ~ / sump catch basin on the public street _ ~ Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~___/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred. 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing uttltttes as necessary. ~_J 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the _/_/ Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or tssuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval to the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits to the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all uttltttes and other interested agencies involved ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map wail be subject to any requirements that may be received from them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance tf no map is involved sc-~o-os s Protect No SUBTT76654 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR . COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ sc-~o-os C9~~L. ~3S FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00358 (DRC2003-00088) &SUBTT16554 PROJECT NAME: Des Marais DATE: November 16, 2003 PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: < 3600 Souare feet Type V FD REVIEW BY: Molses Eskenazl, Sr. Plans Examiner PLANNER: Donald Gran~er~ __ THE FOLLOW/NG STANDARD CONDITIONS MAY APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS 8~ REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to project FD-03- 0914 and DRC2003-00088 / DRC2003-00358 & SUBTT16554: FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and IocaGon of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft b. Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At mtersecUons 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As requred by the Fire Safety Dvision to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire Contact the Fire Safe Division 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III- A, as amended Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification of fire flow availabtlity for the proposed protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 H drants Used to Su I Fire Flow. Public fire h drants located within a 500-foot radws of the ro osed • C ~`-~.~~ "gyp L • • protect maybe used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fue District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fire Safety Division (909)477-2770 4. Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: basting fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 5 Single-family Residential Plans: For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fve Distract and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delroering any combustible budding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submd a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing 3 Combustible Construction Letter- Required Letter: Pnor to the issuance of a budding permd for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submit a letter to the Fire D~stnct on company letterhead stating that the minmum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal is placed on-sde The roadway shall be maintained at all times. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Construction Access: Fire Distract access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum dear height shalt be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards Contact the Fue Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minmum flinch numbers on a _ contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry ~,~.,~ ~~ RESOLUTION NO 0403 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2003-00358, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 6 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-041-57 A. Recitals. 1. Pinewave Design and Engineenng filed an application for Development Review DRC2003-00358, the Design Revew of Tentative Trail Map SUBTT16554, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is refer-ed to as "the application." 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Base Une Road and Hermosa Avenue vnth a street frontage of approximately 216 feet on Base Line Road and approxmately 315 feet on Hermosa Avenue and presently contains the Minor House, a designated Histoncal Landmark, and b The property to the north of the subject site across Base Irne Road is developed vmth condominwms, the properties to the south and west are developed with single-family homes, and the property to the east is developed with an electncal substation; and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the wcirnty; and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on October2l, 2003, attended by 15 residents, to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback, and e The project design meets or exceeds the Basic Development Standards for lot area, lot width, lot frontage, lot depth, and bwlding setbacks, and C,~~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0403 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 2 f The project, in contunction with Landmark Alteration Pennit DRC2003-00711, moll relocate the Minor House to Lot 6 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 and become part of a neighborhood, a desirable goat; and g. The design and exterior materials of the single family homes incorporates wood siding and decorative braces, architectural elements found on the historic Mmor House, thereby fostering a continuity design, a goal of the General Plan 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and conGudes as follows. a That the proposed project is consistent with the obtecbves of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together vvith the conditions applicable thereto, vvill not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mfunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports mGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect moll have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaretion and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mdigated Negative Decaretion has been prepared in compliance moth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Decaretion with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations C ~~ ~~ `~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-03 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • January 14, 2004 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~on set forth below and in the Standard Condtions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) The houses shall be plotted with substantial front setback vanation, with a variation of +/- 5 feet, at a minimum Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval dunng the grease grade plan submitted for plan check. 2) The colors of the stucco and ledge stone base shall vary on each lot in order to provide visual interest. Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the regwred variations in the stucco color and ledge stone base. 3) A Model 2 plan shall be plotted on Lot 1 4) All Model 1 plans shall have an additional architectural feature or site design, such as a front porch or a decorative dnveway vinth unique scored lines, to provide vanation in the streetscape Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the additional architectural feature. 5) The developer shall provide each prospectve buyer of comer lots wntten notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer poor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 6) Pnor to issuance of building pemuts, the developer shall submit documentation to the Planning Division that the property owners of the lots that share the southerly boundary of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 have agreed to a 1-foot high extension to the existng wall on the southerly boundary line of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554 7) Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a matenat more durable than wood gates Acceptable matenals include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and plastic 8) All conditions of approval per Histonc Preservation Commission Resolution No 04-01 for Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2003-00711 shall apply Enaineenna Division 1) Protect existing traffic signing and stnpmg on Base Line Road Protect • or modify existing traffic signal equipment in Base Line Road Protect existing traffic signal equipment, signing, and stnpmg on Hermosa Avenue Protect existing R26 signs on Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue or replace as regwred Revise existing improvement plans for C ,~L.~L X10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-03 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 4 Base <Jne Road and Hermosa Avenue as needed to show new improvements. 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Hermosa Avenue shall be paid to the City, prior to the issuance of building permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted urnt amount times the length from the southerly property boundary to the northerly terminus pole lust south of Base Line Road. 3) The existing driveways on Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue shall be removed and replaced month curb and gutter and sidewalk. 4) The existing overhead electrical and telecommurncation service Imes to the existing house shall be undergrounded and the utility pole removed. 5) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the conceptual grading plan. 6) The final map forTract 16554 shall be approved prior to the issuance of budding permits 7) The follov~nng shall apply for driveways downhill from street- 6 feet at 6 percent (14 percent maximum between grade breaks) and 1&feetflat in front of garage (could be 13 feet at 5 percent to flow line, then up 5 feet at 2 percent). 8) All improvements within public rights-of-way shall be constructed per public improvement plans with a 2 percent slope within the right-of--way from the property Ime to the top of the curb 9) Install private landscaping and imgation systems rn the parkways of comer Lots 1 and 6 along Hermosa Avenue, prior to public improvements being accepted by the City (Side-on to Arterial streets, where rear-on would be Landscape Maintenance District) 10) Prior to the issuance of budding perrots, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Fore CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Diwsion when the first budding pernit application rs submitted to Budding and Safety Forn CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days follovnng the completion of the construction and/or . demolition project 11) Construct concrete 'V' gutter along Lots 4, 5, and 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0403 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 5 Environmental Mitioation Air Qualdy 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficaUon. 2) Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment moll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management D~stnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied • either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall complyvnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall inGude the follovnng provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Gty if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a . result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of yearof construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high vends (i a ,vend speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements ~- ,`~-,`- ~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0403 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 6 Maintain a minimum 24inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated wfth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMro emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use. 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane v~nndows and weather stnpping Biolograal Resources 1) The Fruitless Mulbery tree shall be saved by transplanting or replaced with the largest nursery grown speamen available to the satisfaction of the City Planner The tree shall be planted on the lot v~nth the relocated Minor House. Cultural Resources 1) Dunng grading and grubbing of the protect site, the developervnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study The archaeologist will monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, vwth an emphasis in the area of the barn slab Also, with the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga vwll Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • C~\~~~ ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-03 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 7 Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate. Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes ~~~~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-03 DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 8 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the appl~aant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall ideniify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving pertnds, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Pernrt Noise 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along the northern boundary of the subdivision, fronting Base Line Road, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1 A 6-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the western and southern boundary of the subdivision, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 6 2) The plans submitted for plan check shall have STC 28 dual-insulated windows and STC 33 solid core extenor wood doors with seals 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speafied in Development Code Section C \`~- ~~-- 1~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-03 ' DRC2003-00358 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • January 14, 2004 Page 9 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division v~nthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immedratey notify the Planning Drvision If noise levels exceed the above standards, then consUuction actrvitres shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance wrth above noise standards or halted. 5) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 6) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, mGudmg Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich MaGas, Chairman Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the folloHnng vote-to-Nnt~ AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitonng • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the onginal authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Diwsion) . 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program . DRC2003-00358 AND SUBTT16554 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to momtor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may apse regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written . notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. B. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Diwsion shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits. • C `~ \ L- I 0 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-00358 and SUBTT16554 Applicant: Pinewave Design and Engineering Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: Mav 5. 2003 f- f .. ., -• .. Air Quality `~ =~,' _ ~ ~'r- +„ .~, '~ ' s All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utd~zed, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C y4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 s ' °i • • - -. ., . . • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of CE C Rewew of Plans A/C y4 work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound CE C Review of Plans A 4 en ineenn ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE by the City if silt is carved over to adfacent public C During A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., gO/CE C wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wdh During q 4 Ruie 403 re wrements Construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other C Rewew of Plans A 4 suitable means - The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Review of Plans A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C y4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be 80 C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 requued to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters n ~ r ~ 2 of 7 - .. , ~ . .. All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Revew of Plans C y4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological ~ '~ ~ ``2-~ ~a~z,,k;~, Y`riY~}°~ ,,. ~ ~ ' e. +d^~H?_r'iv JN~`R"q~ .. ~ The Frwtless Mulberry tree shall be saved by CP C Review of A/C y4 transplanting or replaced with the largest nursery grown Plans/Dunng specimen available to the satisfaction of the City Construction Planner The tree shall be planted'on the lot with the relocated Minor House Cultural Resources ,y. , ~~r,. a ~, ~ ~ , ~ Durng grading and grubbing of the protect site, the CPBO C Revew of A/C y4 developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor Plans/During construction activities and take appropriate measures to Construction protect or preserve them for study The archaeologist will monitor the northeast quadrant of the property, with an emphasis in the area of the barn slab Also, with the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sties from demolition or signficant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Revew of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines i 3 of~ • • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrUCtion .. CP P C ewew of Report .. A/D -. /4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall B Rewew of Report A/D 4 submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Rewew of A/p q egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities '/ r Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or r d d d BO B/C Review of A/p 4 g a e , ivert earth-disturbing activties Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and Hold the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Rewew of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum ~ f Geoldgy.Bnd,Sails~ ~, x ~.~°~~~~-~.~ ~ ~~~ , The site shall be treated with water or other sod BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a Construction emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4 of 7 I' r 1 .. . .. .. . -~ .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During q q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During q q RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to Construction reduce PM,o emissions HytJrologyandWater~Quahty '~ '`~';,;;°~_~,`~~~~,x ~;~,. - ,~~~., Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C yq be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/q submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 5 0~ • .. Norse ` ` ..`i~;.r, rc c -"s,,~ 1 ~ ti ~~ ~vpQx ' `i;s~. cY. ~ ~ i ~ ~ ;?~~. : ',~a"~~'.~ ~t~' rn~'~ An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along BO/CP v L C/D . Revew of A/C/D CC ~cc egg ,~A~i -i]p'D` the northern boundary of the subdvision, fronting Base Plans/Dunng 2,3 Line Road, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 1. A Construction 6-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the western and southern boundary of the subdivision, and along the eastern boundary of Lot 6 The plans submitted for plan check shall have STC 28 BO/CP C/D Review of A/C/D dual-insulated windows and STC 33 solid core exterior 2,3 wood doors with seals Plans/During Construction Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction rncluding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C Dunng q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Dwision If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A q as possible in first phase Construction r g 6 of 7 .. . . . ... . . .. Haul truck dellverles shall not take place between the POGO C During q q~7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, constructlon Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and f rom the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any constructlon traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations 7 r Responsible Person ->~" `~~< ,Monitoring Frequency~~~~ Method of-Verification -~ ,Sanctions ~-,~," = - - ~ "; , CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection - , 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -Cary Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWCtion B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit CE -Cary Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - Wdhhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Flre Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cltatwn i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-revs-03final doc 7 D~ •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358 SUBJECT: 6-LOT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HERMOSA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aaemattve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense to the defense of any such action but such parttapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Development Review DRC2003-00358 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16554 and Minor Exception DRC2003-00726 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-03, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/gradrng activates and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenVDesign Review approval shall expire tf bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations ComoleBOn Date ~~- ~~ ~_/_ ~_/_ -J-/_ SC-10-03 1 C ~~ ~`,-, ~~ Protect No DFC2003-00358 Comoletion Date 2 Prior to any use of the prolect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ___/~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits. 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwiding, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~___/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldmg permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with ~___/_ all receptacles shielded from public view. B All ground-mounted utildy appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All bwldmg numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~ including proper illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 11 The prolect contains a designated Historical Landmark The site shall be developed and ~~_ maintained in accordance with Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No DRC2003-00711 . Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the bwldings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the prolect perimeter If a double wall ~~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 13 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 14 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 15 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 16 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk ~_/ S SC-10-03 2 C \~' ~ \`~ Protect No DRC2003-00358 17 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Dmsion Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwiding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier to accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved to place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods i 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, vrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4 Ali private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, ail slope planting and vrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each indmdual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required perthe Development Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Dmsion • 8 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line Road SC-10-03 3 C, ~~ ~~ \~ Completion Date ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~ -/_J- J~- ~~- ~~- -~-~- ~~. Prgect N o DRC2003-00358 Completion Date 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~___/ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ___/~_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. JJ_ Any signs proposed for this development shall complywith the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to Installation of any signs H. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to the ~~_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and If appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report. 2. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustlcal engineer that all recommendations of ~~_ the acoustical report were Implemented In construction, including measurements of Interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Division prior to final occupancyrelease of the affected homes. 3 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of ~___/ Implementing saki measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Cary Planner In the amount of $719 00 pnor to the Issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory • pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds maybe used by the Clty to retain consultants and/or pay for Clty staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building penults APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following ~_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, SC-10-03 4 ~ ~~. \ ~ \~ Protect No DRC2003-00358 Completion Date e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and s¢e . of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. ~,_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet° signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/~ the City prior to permit issuance. 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~~_ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~~_ contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements. K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or mafor addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m Monday ~_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations ~J_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~~ M. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bwldmg Code, City Grading ~_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan . 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work SC-10-03 5 C `~ \~ `\D Protect No DRC2003-00358 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bulldinc permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and foi existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more o' combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Callfomis registered Crvii Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Base Llne Road O. 3 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets Base Line Road 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty Street Improvements All public Improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shali be constructed to Clty Standards. Interior street Improvements shall Include, but are not Ilmited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not Ilmited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Base Llne Road x x x x Hermosa Avenue x x x x °A" Street x x x x x x 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Completion Date ~~_ ~~ • ~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~~ ~~_ ~~ ~.~- ~~- ~~. ~~~ SC-10-03 6 C ~ 1~ \ \ 1 Protect No DRC2003-00358 Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d. Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnorto submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be perthe public landscape improvement plans ComoleM1On Date ~~- ~~. ~~. ~J- ~~. ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~~ SC-10-03 7 C ~~ \~ 1\~ Protect No DRC2003-00358 Comoleaon Dflte The Ctty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze' Oty Base Line Road 3' Foreground tree Magnolia grandiflora NCN 30' o c 15-gal Fill P A 8' or greater 'Samuel Sommer' formal in P A less than 8' or Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20' o c 15-gal under power lines 'St Mary' formal Background tree Liquidambar American Sweet Gum B' 25' o c 15-gal P A 8' or greater styraciflua informal Accent tree Lagerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20' o c 24' 'Natchez' white box Hermosa Avenue 8' or greater p a Platanus ecenfloia London Place tree 8' 30' o c 15-gal 8' or greater p a Lagerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20' o c 24' under utilities 'Catawba' multi dark purple box Smaller than 8' p a Lagersteomia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20' o c 24' no utilities 'Catawba' standard dark purple box 'Use Sycamores as on-site background tree within inadequate room necessitates Crape Myrtles Cul-de-sac provide Select tree from the street name approved Street Tree List for Rancho Cucamonga 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required P Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public W orks Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Base Line Road Lots 1-3 ~~- -~-f_ SC-10-03 8 C, ~~ ~~ ~,~~ Protect No DRC2003-00358 Completion Date 2 Public landscape areas are regwred to incorporate substantial areas ( % of mortared cobble _/___/_ . or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~ /_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or tssuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~~_ developer until accepted by the Ctty 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~~_ Beauttftcation Master Pian Base Line Road Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~~_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entenng the ~_/ property from adjacent areas 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured ~~ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows to the event of a blockage to a _/~_ sump catch basin on the public street ~R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~._/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) to accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/~_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ~~_ Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the tssuance of permits to the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies tnvolved ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that maybe received from them S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or priorto building permit issuance tf no map is tnvolved CJ SC-10-03 9 (`, \~ \~ \ \~ Protect No DRC2003-00358 Comotetion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR . COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all stidtng glass doors. _/_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within ~_/ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 Ali garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. JJ_ U. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted ___/~_ from frame or track m any manner V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for mghtttme _/~_ vtstbthty APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • sc-~o-os io C ~~ ~ ~, `~S FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00358 (DRC2003-00088) &SUBTT16554 PROJECT NAME: Des Marals DATE: November 16, 2003 PLAN TYPE: SFR Tract APPLICANT NAME: Des Marais OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): < 3600 Square feet TYPE CONSTRUCTION• Type V FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED none LOCATION: SW corner of Baseline and Hermosa FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi, Sr Plans Examiner PLANNER: Donald Gra ge _ _ n ; o ~~ THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS MAYAPPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS 8~ REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to project FD-03- 0914 and DRC2003-00088 / DRC2003-00358 & SUBTT16554: FSC-1 General Requirements for Pubfic and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general guidance for the spaang and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft U Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire Contact the Fire Safet Diwsion 909 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow. The required fire flow for this protect is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III- A, as amended Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification of fire flow availability for the proposed protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 H drams Used to Su I Fire Flow Public fire h drams located within a 500-foot radws of the ro osed C~~ ~L ~~~ pro/ect maybe used to provide the regwred fire flow sub/ect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fire Safety Division (909)477-2770 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 5. Single-family Residential Plans• For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located withrn 600-feet of the proposed project sde PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the project Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water Distract inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing 3. Combustible Construction Letter- Regwred Letter Prior to the issuance of a building perinrt for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Insta//aLon o(ReFlectrve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2. Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Dvision (909) 477-2770 3 _ Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry r~ LJ c,~,~ ~~~ RESOLUTION NO 04-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2003-00726, A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE PERIMETER WALL HEIGHT ALONG THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT TO 8 FEET, AND TO EXTEND THE PERIMETER WALL HEIGHT ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT TO 7 FEET, FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00358, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 6SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16554 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-041-57. A Recitals. 1 Pinewave Design and Engineenng, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Exception DRC2003-00726, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day January 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to Development Review DRC2003-00358 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16554, a 6-lot single-family m-fill project, located at the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue, and b. The property to the north of the subject site across Base Line Road is developed with condominiums, the properties to the south and west are developed with single-family homes, and the property to the east is developed Huth an electncel substation, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the viGrnty, and d The Minor Exception request is to extend the penmeter wall height along the northern and eastern boundary of the project to B feet, and to extend the penmeterwall height along the southern boundary of the protect to 7 feet, and C ~~~~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-04 ME DRC2003-00726 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 14, 2004 Page 2 e Literal enforcement of the standard wall height would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by making it infeasible for the protect to meet the extenor noise standards of the City, and f There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subtect property that do not apply to a majority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area because the protect is bounded on the north by an arterial street and on the east by a secondary street, which make the site subtect to noise levels greater than 60dBA, and g Literal enforcement of the wall height standards would deprive the applicant of development enjoyed by other properties in the Haven Avenue Overlay Distnct by requinng the applicant to significantly alter the proposed design of the project in order to meet the required noise levels, and h. The granting of the Minor Exception moll not constitute a special pnvilege because there are unique site conditions (i a ,traffic noise levels generated on two frontages of the project site greater than 60dBA) and the granting of the Minor Exception moll not constitute a special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone in that Minor Exceptions for wall heights have been granted for other projects for sound attenuation purposes 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the General Plan and intent of the Development Code. b. That there are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c That the stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would depnve the applicant of pnvileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same distnct d That the granting of the Minor Exception moll not constitute a grant of a special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and moll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Minor Exception identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines All requirements for use of that exemption have been satisfied, including, but not limited to, land use, density and average slope 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~ion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference C ~~~ ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 03-04 ME DRC2003-00726 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING . January 14, 2004 Page 3 1) Minor Exception approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval 2) Approval is to extend the penmeter wall height along the northern and eastern boundary of the probed to 8 feet, and to extend the penmeter wall height along the southern boundary of the probed to 7 feet. 3) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No. 04-03 approving Development Review DRC2003-00358 shall apply 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the follovnng vote-to-w~t AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES' COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS • •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00726 SUBJECT: MINOR EXCEPTION FOR 8-FOOT PERIMETER WALL APPLICANT: PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: r~A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematNe, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code . regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City )Planner SC-10-03 1 ~ ~ `~ ~ ~, \~` Completion Date .~~- ~~ -/~- ~-/- ~-/_ Protect No DRC2003-00726 ComoleLOn Date 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for I ~_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, • building, etc) or prior to final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdrotsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all I ~~_ other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance L~ • SC-70-03 2 C t~~ ~ ~ 12Z T H E C I T Y O f RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Emily Wlmer SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16542 - J T STORM - A request to subdivide 4 92 acres Into 11 lots in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etlwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue - APN 0227-071-24 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00602, Variance DRC2003-00604, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00603 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM - A request to develop 11 single family homes on 3 93 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), of the Etlwanda Specific Pian, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue - APN 0227 071-24 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542, Variance DRC2003-00604, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003- 00603 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2003-00604 - J T STORM - A request for a Variance for wall height on the east and south sides of the property, totaling 13 feet in height in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etlwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue - APN 0227-071-24 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542, Development Review DRC2003-00602, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003- 00603 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density 2 23 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Etlwanda High School West - East Avenue -Vacant Property, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS "D,E,M" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16542 AND DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 2 C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Etiwanda High School West - East Avenue D Site Characteristics The protect site is located on the east side of East Avenue south of Highland Avenue The site is predominately a vacant parcel with a slope of 2 percent Located on site are Eucalyptus windrows on and near the north, east, and southern property lines The parcel also contains asingle-family residence and a large detached garage that are both proposed for demolition The parcel is bounded by an existing housing development to the north, Etiwanda High School to the southeast, a residential lot to the south, and East Avenue to the West ANALYSIS A General The site will be developed under the Low Residential Basic Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan The proposed average lot size is 15,567 square feet, which meets or exceeds all Speafic Plan regwrements The applicant is proposing to construct 11 single-family homes that will range in size from 3,760 square feet to 4,159 square feet The three home elevations proposed consist of a Spanish Colonial, a Tuscan, and a European Cottage A total of six floor plan options and six elevation options are being proposed The home designs exhibit a high level of design and integrity The East Avenue theme wall wdl be constructed as part of the development and incorporate authentic aver rock walls and terraced planters B Variance The applicant is proposing a Variance to increase the southern perimeter wall height from 6 feet to approximately a13-foot high block wall on the southern property line including Lots 1-3, 5, and 6 The Variance is necessary because of the significant grade differential from the properties to the south The wall will be constructed to retain a portion of the slope Approval for the Variance for wall heights would be compatible with the surrounding conditions The walls proposed are a combination of perimeter wall and retaining wall C Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on November 4, 2003, and recommended approval subtect to the revisions, which included additional ledger stone Approval was subtect to staffs comments with the additional condition that the applicant dress-up the rear of each bwlding elevation to include more architectural elements The Committee asked the applicant to work with staff to resolve the issue (Exhibit "F") The applicant has since added additional wrap around elements to the rear and side elevations to satisfy the Committee's condition, as reflected in the attached elevations (Exhibit "E") D Technical Review Committee The Grading and Technical Rewew Committees have reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions attached D,E, ~'c12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16542 AND DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 3 E Tree Removal Permit The applicant agreed to preserve and relocate as many trees as possible An arbonst report was prepared that concluded the Eucalyptus trees are in poor condition and are poor candidates for transplanting with a low survrvabdity rate As mitigation for their removal, new Eucalyptus windrow trees will be planted per the Etiwanda Specific Plan The arbonst recommended relocating the two Palm trees on-site F Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on September 15, 2003, at City Hall. A total of 3 residents attended, and they were generally accepting of the layout and the architectural style of the homes Tree removal was of a concern to the neighbors . G Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II Staff determined that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact through short-term air quality impacts during the site preparation, such as grading, equipment, and exhaust Staff also determined that there might be noise impacts resulting from the traffic along East Avenue, as well as biological impacts resulting from tree removal The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level A noise study was prepared that concluded the traffic noise from East Avenue would be the dominant noise impact from the area The report proposed • sound attenuation measures to mitigate the noise to comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga noise control standards CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT16542, Development Review DRC2003-00602, and Varance DRC2003-00604 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, .~- Brad -- City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location/ Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Design Revew Committee Action Comments dated November 4, 2003 . Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Draft Resolut ion of Approval for SUBTT16542 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2003-00602 Draft Resolut ion of Approval for Variance DRC2003-00604 fl ~~ ~C<~ 3 1090J-fMLJdH HNY 1K911IH115 ruL, vs..r ee9 - - ..a.w Ian - ann KT~ ~ 9~ )N/Nr 999v n.. In ..w.. n orr~ n...9. nusw I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~__ i I ~_L___________________ I I ~ ` I LO) ONl3NYd ON1151X] ' \ ~ )OONJS HOIH / / ~ I ~ \ I / YONYMI!] ~ X I ~ / I ~ / ~ ( l / ONIN07 ONl/SIX] I ~ A/1SN30 MO) / ~ - \ )YI1N30I53N ONIl srX3 ~I I /'~-~- --~• ~ O9 ~ ~ ~ I I; _JYS-30-707 ]UQ1NJ I _ I ~, ,.~_ _____ I I OOy ~ I )Y11N30/5]b I ~ \ I I/ISN]0 M01 ONINOZ 9NNSIX] I \ I /NYJYA I ~ I - - -__ I I )nm]Ors]H I I` AIISN]0 MO)JNIN01 JNIISIX] 700HJS NOIN _ _ '11 I YONYMII3 - - I` 11]X15 l ICI -1-_ ryl ~I 1 1 I LNYJYA I I I 9N/ I OrL15/XJI I I I )YI1N1015]H N]01 ]H OI~I151X] ~ }~} __ _ _ ~ 1 AlI5N30 MO) ON/NOI 9NII f/X] I I I W / 1NYJYA i ~ / _ _ _ J _ I - 1 g _ _ _ I~~''-Y11NJ0 tl l _ i 9 I)JHIS )NOlfla'Onf ~ I Ir 009 % G 1/SN]0 M01 9N/NOZ 9NI~lXJ ~ ^ I \ % g ~- _ i 1H70If]H ONI 1X3 ~ I __L_ __ ~~ r-1-T7 l s ^ 1115N]O MO) ON/NOd 9NNSAY3 \~ In ~ - I i w r I !Y/lN]'0/53¢' JNI1S~] ~ I mns Yemn ~ _ F==r _ ~_;- __ -_-- I ~ --1 ~ ~--~ -~ I I ! i I~ ~- -- II ~ ~I ~ T~ U~ ~ ~` ^ `- ] ~t I l^ _ __ I 4 _I .I l i 'I - J ,r_~ I ~ ------, ~-- - - ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 I 13N S]bJr Olfb SLOI 1~ SSCtlJ fltlil 9P'gf CWL iNT C ~ N.w a.s< xo-.~.av ~~. ~~~o~< .na ay ~••u~ YlN303OYJ .i0 31Y15 'ON/O8YN83HV NYS JO AINNOJ ~w ~ ,1-1 YONOHYJ/IJ ONJNYN d0 ALJ 3N1 NI ^~ I Zt99T ON .L.~ d2f.L BALL d.LN~.L +VI derv Nou dznun aus V 0 9 ~S I ~ ~ I I ~ o]are]xd sand ~ _ , Y ~ 7 1 „ r , t ' NJO AIIJ si ' } I T Ol/Y hf91119J5 LL r _ _ r .~~GU Pm 1 F I _ 1 I `. ao.,.o. ,,.+ s 7O0H05 NOIN 4' ;_y-.,_-y - - .., S - f t ,.f _ Z° s.l I,I r J q VONVYA/13 L r„ I{15,'L9Z'OZ 35 OZO 4I J5 S99 fl 35 008 f l -J$ 66L f( 15 OZZ bl I i 1 I r r I 1 ,. .-. ua _ II I r I h r' ' ` ~ : I In mn~ r>:m I _ ..w wu VIII I i 1 f -. . •r uV •.aw P- - -kJ3NtS- - a4_ _ l _ __ L it ~ I C, 't^i. r~u wr..r ,.. I _ ~„Ir~~, • r r j~ ~l ~ ~ r~ ...~.mr.~, ~». ,~Ilj~,~ I- _ _ ,. ~~ I ,, l ~ i ~ i I _ ~ _ . b p [, carman ~ I I _ t - I ~ I r I~ ~ ~ I ~ n 1 I ~ ~ _ I ~^^' e - __ _ -I 35 6B5 OZ 35 9694! .. 35 f9641 35 Sf941 ~ d5 69OLl, I .~...=' ~'A =_~_- ~ mac' a L, 8 - 6 01 '" _ - l1 I ~ I I~'~ ~- _ -_ -__ _ -~jV_ - __ ' _ r ~ _ _- - -- r,~~I F --~._ -'__ ~-_ '- if _r_ s" r~ 1 C _ -•r _ I + '- ,.I _ y.l. __ _ __"ICI. ,I ~ r I I ~1 ~ ~ ~~°'°~~~` ~ ~ ~ I-~~~ ~1 ~rlr~- '~ ~ ,I. ~ ~~ I I( ~i ~ ~~a ~I~~~__ r6 ~.r ,~ IIE a ~ ~, ~ i . ^r~~~l:tegC, ~::uL -r tn, _. I „__ _ 't _Il~ .r - f r __ ~' I ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ., r I ~ _ I`L0_NI15/X3 - I I]N (b'JV 0116 ~n LOl rr SS0.YJ Sltlly 9{W S (O'JL lx/Y Q~~{LtV Y/NN01flq d0 3l YLS ~ONIONYNN3B aNY5 JO .f1Nr70J 'I _ YDNOHYJIIJ ONJN18 i0 AAJ JHl NI gllpl z~ss r o/v ,c.~ v~uc ,~nr,c v.cN,~,t db'{N l~dl~L 3~1/l b'1N31 ' - -' Q l~~'t+ t X w rtfP(5 9 ~ ~ ~ {~ i ~ xt se YA ~ e !p , ~ ' ~ 5 l ~! ~ a lag s~ ~i 8 ! ~ l !8 8 ~ l ~ F6a~ee~~ye kY ~~ C Y f k a FF~ py{ i7~~~i ~~yd! S ~ r P, 5~"REI -S:l~ ~~t ~ p5 i o `: EY !Y !~ SaC ~€als; ~~::fl p f e ~Ela ~ isle ~ l i 52 : `o , ~ SS IPe~"~:5~?i ~~lPl, ; ~p l Od~Y9l al1~ a f !~ ~ 3 v ~ ~l;za@ ; g }kY1'5p' T i it gty€SFEa92Y~1~jp '- ~y=~~~?ecaYe ~ Y - 4 ~ l I' II AAA f ~ f , i II I 4~ yqs X ~ aa pp ~ 5 i A } ti' ~I - 0 4 I. 3 tl j p ~ II II d J, 93t II ~ 2 ! + A Q ~ e eJ pp I I Z" 8 ~~, iY ~ I r.! lW ~ O o 5! cp9 F' Uo~ ~ ~ p S~ ~~ ~!i ~ C.J iZ y ~~ 9s' ~>e@ ~ C :, . ! : 3,~l, ~ e a af= Y i /~ ~ ~m CS ~ i I `l ~ 2 ~A U ~ ? ~ ,! =a 0 ~ ~ ~ V U ~ - W P ~ ~ ~ d { _- I e' ' L y 1 I e Y e 'c c -~~~~ W v v D _~: Z 4 a UI I ~ ~ I I ¢Itnl I = W I I U I. I =I f v~-- _- J-_~ i 10900-rE0iJY0 OHI LN w +M1A Oen nW usi 6 ~I LN N'N~E IIJMI yN}I ISr) r f Tuf r. +r w a-.. .-,] /I n N LN 7-7 N0I103S -] ] Nolloai 1. -0+ .~ // (O] pxWJ/H- SIN 3-3 NOl1035 .... 11 Wv slN a-a Nouo3s r .,..~::.°.~. H, ., ~ i anti, . '1' ~ TJu TII M as.~. '~ t`~'~ u' II /urrr ~ aif I~-Y YpI Ytl+~ 0/ lv] r I)/I 5)yJI OIr6r 5101 11 SS0.YJ 53tlJ1 9Rtl f f[di ]//tt YINNOdRYJ JO 31Y1S]ONIO3YN339 NYS d0 A1NlIOJ 'YJNONYJ/IJ ONJNYX 30 ,lllJ 3N1 N1 ztss t onr ,co Luc ,~ntc e~cN,~,t Nd~d JNIOb'NJ ~b'/lld3ONOO $IN 0-0 NOlL03S Y: tip;=`- ~;~ ~r ~ ~~ I' ~ li n .' 4 ~F. w ~w y ~ ~ Jm LN d-d NOIL 035 ° / 1.- .~' I~ D u'r I. 4 ~~ °"~ ! . I u nw nM •4~ ~l ~~~ N-H NO1103S ~J~ :~ I ~~ ~~rGTrY'zT~4L-'~'Y '-'1 ~. .~f _ ~- nrob wvn ~~~~~~ _r-` ~4 __--- ~==mad )scab ~usu)~ ~ FSS-~iLS~`~~~ I SPI i m mms r IYO/NYI ./Y~ IYONYY/ ~~ I SPi UXIS ,I, M/Y IbObIN llrv 5]bJ, Oi(6( AO/ a SSUb9 5_tl_v 9BUOS fOUC p/rc Y/N80d17YJ d0 3l C{g/ONIO8YN839 NYS d0 A1N/10J YONOWYJOJ OHJNYN ./0 .lllJ 7N1 NI ztS9 / ON .L.~ 6'2f.1 BALL t.LN,~.L Nb'7d JNIOb'dJ 7d/]1d3ONOO Y)d tlOf 03tlvd3tld fNY) IJtl3d5 IONYMII )J OHJNYtl JO .I11J -f00tbU Orv. 6S941IO5 700NJ5 N~IN ~~'~~ VONVM/13 .d.,~.m....Y s avn ~w~r. a.m,.a ~~ --_Ar: »» it I - I-'~ --Y+.9.'Lfr~i _ ~ I ~ 9 ,- ^~ • f ~z 1 - i I I + I I Iii i~ra" alm l/, o ~ ~ ~ - I -u < ~~ - .- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _v e n I i ~~.v-zm ~a~l ~'_- _-_ ~y IZ I 1NVJVA I ( M ~1 b +11 ~`` h r inl 1 -` Iii.' °~'S+-, l ~~ ~ ~ -~s.Rl::'.'0Y `Si S~ ~ ~ I T_ "~.x ..8. x r6. .O%. V4, u "// ;. ~ iii ...., ....~ I --mss rr-n:l j I ~ ul I ~ i'I W I , ~i it i N , a ~_ -- ' ~ JI I -- - it -- ~uslx3 - I AV ONV7HJIH i -~---- I I - -, lix 5]NJ. OIf6f SIOf a SSOYJ 9bly 9iW S f0.'L ixT ~ Y/,NNOdl9Yl f0 31 Y1S'ONIONYNN36 NYS d0 11N110J _ YJNOWYJOJ ONJNtlB d0 t11J 3Nl N/ --~- ~~G91 ON .L,7d2f.G .~~II.L6.LN.~.L Nb'7d 31/S 037Id13~ .p ,~ .9 's x • • ~ w lI5 - lUAI.:Ai~l PLAN 1 EAST AVENUE 11 ~,~~~ ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC .~ -_... SUB]T 16542 wND DRC2003-00603 p~ lA -SPANISH COLONIAL 1 C -EUROPEAN COTTAGE • RIGHT REAR LEFT PLAN 1 A SPANISH COLONIAL EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J_T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2 LLC SUB]116392 AND DRC2003-00602 D` ~ 1~ `~ SIE9AT_KNi R6TE • EW W(.~ SLR MO FFAC 6tPMTIOIS AS SLNM SHMl. Gi]IR Ot1Y 011045 IX104D i0 MGC /O:ER j11t5E {C,~ OFE Ret(fl pi 1019 16 j p MD 11 C(LM QF fN:IOI EEry@X~2yy1 [E RftIRD 5 OPfCM$ M N1111bnE5 „~ - ~ ~ ,,,K.~K _ rt. .~.a ~~'. ,~,,,.a.m.~ ~ 9..~ ,~ ~..~ (lnr n c Y) RIGHT LL' 1' 1 r u u TLECIAT_ICf~. HATE' swu.¢'aln aar a was wama ro rwic rnxs PLAN 1B _~~~`~'~ TIl!$E Ig1E5 ME fl~~~dl 1x19 1,6,'I~D ru it TUSCAN • oxxs a~rusra e¢r¢.a src eE aes~ orrlals w ru. „ canes . EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO.~2, LLI~/C ,~"~„'„ SURTTl6593 AND DRG3003-00603 ~ `~ ~ \ ~ \ \ [~ l~l MK IIITi[ REA1Z arorvc webs ~~ 1'Clasri 1 emornxiA REAR ~~ LEFT PLAN 1 C EUROPEAN COTTAGE Iffi EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC SUBTI'16542 AND DRC2003-00602 O \~ `'~ ` \~ ~va7~Y_tnx~. . EIAW~ID ° MID P69q EtP.NiidLS A55bN. SITYl.0.~h ONLY Oi wa5IX1n4n TO PYBt1GKLfSS TMese was axe Pmrea ow en i s,Y,o..o ~i ~cx~rasrea etamfsawt cs 0l`xFJ@O rc oPre«s w au. ii wncs L13 - ~l~ll~(:AlV PLAN 2 ~~ EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J_T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC ,W.. _,,,, SUBT[16W2 AND DAC200S-00602 O` E\ ~ \a 2A -SPANISH COLONIAL 2C -EUROPEAN COTTAGE --.- ~J ~ ~~~ RIGHT REAR PLAN 2A SPANISH COLONIAL EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC SVflTT16592 AND DRC200J-00602 D 1 ~ \~ \S _ „~,"., „~ ~~UATIaN-NOTE sW.1-Ot~IM1 0`Lr a Ib1E5 4WD m PRUGItl:Pc+. TMLSf Ia+ES AAC fltlli[nW en i,0,7,b+e 11 • DK] a 4F fM3}CR DFIYQMSAWI Cf OIfEf£O i6 OPfCNS WALL 11 Ib'IOa • l~l tTll 1 k W ~tt ]iqp K H:AK ti ~..,~6 LEFT C _~ TI FvATroN NOTE. SW1L KYl.0. OtAY 09IYHES WD3D TD PINGATPf PLAN 2B ~"~~"~"""'~"'~"" TXE+E ICME" nFF Rrni(n aN iGm i,6 ~,nwo ii TUSCAN . ceaS O~r+ASreit eFlrmii5swt eE aFrel~o rs o7rens ~++a,. n xmnc~ EAST AVENUE 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D~E~1 ~ \ ~Y~ J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC _.. _..~ SUDTT16342 AND DRC2003-00602 } RVJ IG9TI MV®IY1M LEFT ~Lb9Zkkl.flOTE • ¢IYWK.BJ SCEa AND F£M FJ-LMTCKS AS AVMf~ PLAN 2C 5~~"~Ya~ES°~°,~"'""'~ ~YESE HMS PRC flrn1FDa~ IO15 ~ 6,T,b µO ~~ EUROPEAN COTTAGE • `~°~"""°1°~"'~'"LLT~~° opnx+s ~ ~„ tee; • EAST AVENUE 11 ~ £ m `~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I ~ J.T. STORM DEVELOPMENT NO. 2, LLC ~_ _._ SUHTI16512 AND DRC2003-U0602 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 9.00 p.m. Emily W finer November 4, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00602 - J.T. STORM - A request to develop 11 single family homes located in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre) on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue - APN: 0227-071-24. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTi 6542 - J.T. STORM -A request to subdivide 4.92 acres into 11 lots in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue - APN: 227-071-24. Design Parameters: The protect is located on the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue. The average lot size is 15,567 and a maximum lot size of 20,892. The site slopes north to south with a 2-4 percent slope with Eucalyptus windrows on or near the north, east, and southem property line. The property also includes asingle-family residence and a large detached garage that are both proposed for demolition. The protect is surcounded by an existing housing development to the north, Etiwanda High School to the east, a residential lot to the south, and East Avenue to the west. The property is bordered by unique features including a partial Eucalyptus window on the north • property line, a partial windrow on the southem property line, just south of the protect, and a few scattered trees to the east abutting the school district properly. The developer is proposing to transplant two Palm trees on-site The developer has worked diligently with staff to retain the Eucalyptus trees and the root structure to the fullest extent possible. According to the Certified Arbonst, Jim Borer, in order to reduce systemic shock to the root system, the developer is proposing a shallow (12-inch) continuous footing to be installed every three feet along the existing soil surface. The continuous footing should be hand dug, and a temporary fence will be installed at the nearest encroachment to the trees to prevent any trauma to the trees during grading and construction. The developer is also proposing a 3-foot retaining wall system across the south and east property Imes. W rought iron fencing will be used on the matonty of the property lines. The trees will also be trammed to reduce the possibility of shedding branches, and the entire root zone will be treated prior to grading to assist with tree stability during construction operations. The developer is proposing two separate floor plans with three elevations styles for each plan. This will incorporate six elevations for ten lots. The elevation styles consist of Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, and European Cottage The square footage ranges from 3,760 to 4,159 square feet. The front elevations of all homes include great articulation with the use of pot shelves with corbels, wrought iron accents, exposed rafter tails, and additional rustic features. A total of six floor plan options and six elevation options are being proposed. Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion • regarding this protect 1 Plan 1 -The side and rear elevations shall emulate the style and characteristics of the front elevations Continue accent features on all architectural styles as follows• DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16542 AND DRC2003-00602 - J.T STORM November 4, 2003 Page 2 a. Continue the wrought iron gall work on the smaller square windows located on the right and left elevations of Plan 1 A. b. Provide a Spanish style type of relief (i.e. archway, wrought iron, terra cotta) on the rear elevation of Plan 1A. c. Change balcony from stucco to "rustic ledge' veneer on the rear elevation. This will incorporate the ledge stone on the left elevation as well and provide 360-degree architecture. d. Add wood corbels and decorative shutters to the sides and rear of Plan 1 C. e. Repeat the decorative wood vent with corbels on the gable roof for the rear elevation of Plan 1 C. 2. Plan 2. The side and rear elevations shall emulate the style and characteristics of the front elevations. Continue accent features on all architectural styles as follows: a. Add wood shutters to the left elevation on the first floor of Plan 2A. Also, prowde a decorative feature on the rear elevation to enhance the exterior garage wall. b Continue ledge stone on the balcony of Plan 26. This will incorporate ledge stone on the left and rear elevations. c. Incorporate the European accents on the rear and left elevations, including arched stucco Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Retaining walls proposed on the east and south elevation shall be decorative block with a decorative cap. 2. Corner side yards shall have a minimum of 5 feet between the sidewalk and property line wall. This area shall be fully landscaped and irrigated. Any 2. 1 slope shall require lute netting for erosion control. 3. The developer shall work with the adtommg property owners to ensure a smooth transition between slopes and planter areas between the adtoming rear yard property Imes. Jute netting is also required. Policy Issues. The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion• 1 No wood fencing is allowed. Construct block walls between homes (i.e along interior side and rear property Imes) for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 2 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 3. Fifty percent of the finished product shall provide garage doors with windows as a standard feature. Windows shall follow the design of the elevations. p~~`(`(~ `0, DRC COMMENTS SUBTTi 6542 AND DRC2003-00602 - J.T.STORM November 4, 2003 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the condition that the applicant revise the elevations to address the above design issues Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cnstine McPhail, Pam Stewart and Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Emily Wimer The applicant revised the elevations to include Spanish style relief on Plan 1. Ledge stone was added to the balcony on the rear elevation, additional shutters were added to the windows, and a faux window was added on the garage side elevation. Corbels were added on the gable side elevations. The applicant revised Plan 2 to include additional wood shutters on the left elevation. Ledge stone was added to the balcony as well. Foam tnm arched over the accent windows was also included. The Committee recommended approval of the protect subject to the approval of slopes and retaining walls at the rear of lots. The revised plans wdl be submitted for City Planner review, pnor to Planning Commission heanng. ~.J ~,E,i'c~ Zo ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Coy of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pool clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one Ilne to the next Ime J Planning Dmsron (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the applicafion is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing mformahon Application Number (or the protect to which this form peRains ~~/ W I ~ ~ ~~ Protect Tdle • Name 8 Address of protect owner(s) J T Storm Development No 2 LLC P O Box 2428 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-2428 Name 8 Address of developer or protect sponsor J T Storm Development No 2, LLC P O Box 2428 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-2428 Contact Person & Address Jay Ahluwalla Member P O Box 2428 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-2428 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if dl(/erent from above) Telephone Number D1F.~1;'C~ 2.\ EnwronmentallnfoForm 1 -East Ave Protect -Des. Dev, TTM Paget Created on 6/16/2003 10 35 AM ~' Information indicated by an asterisk (') /snot required of non-conshucbon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the prolect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the noRh, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the sae Include a map showing IocaUon of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) 6717 East Ave Rancho Cucamonqa CA 91739 The protect is South of Highland Avenue North of Victoria East of East Ave and West of Ettwanda High School 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addibonal sheet it necessary) 0227-071-24-0-000 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq ft) 4 92 '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 3 93 7) Oescnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would aNect [he protect site (attach additional sheet it necessary) N/A 8) Include a description of all permds which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ed Grading bwlding mechnical electrical blockwalls engineering enroachment 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the pro/ect including in/ormation on topography, sal stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (mcludmg age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs of significant (eatures described In addition, cite all sources of information (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) • The site is located in the Ebwanda area of the City of Rancho Cucamonqa It is bounded by an existing housing development to the North Ebwanda High School athletic fields to the East, a residential lot to the • _ South and by East Avenue to the West D,E, c~ 22 EnvironmentallnfoForml -East Ave Pro/ect -Des, Dev, TTM Page 2 Created on 617 6/2003 10 35 AM Topographically the property is essentially planar, sloping to the South at about a 2 percent grade • Elevations range from approximately 1,380 to 1 385 feet above sea level Vegetation consits primarily of native grasses and several large eucalyptus trees Man-made features consist of a residential structure and a garage 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crte all sources of rnformat~on (books, published reports and oral history) None i 11) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses None 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect in detail Thrs should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach addrhonal sheet(s) if necessary The proposed protect consists of 11 single family residences and is anticipated to be done in one phase The completion date will be 10 months after building permits are issued D,~,t~ 23 EnvironmentallnfoForml -East Ave Protect -Des, Dev TTM Page 3 Created on 6/16/2003 10 35 AM 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including informahon on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land uae (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The site is bounded by an existing housing development to the North Etlwanda Hlgh School athtectic field to the East a residential lot to the South and by East Avenue to the West Vegetation consists primarily of native grasses and several large eucalyptus trees The land will be used to develop 11 two storied single family homes with the maximum height of roof being 30 feet These homes well meet all city criteria In the Basic Development Standards of the Etlwanda Specific Plan 14) Wdl the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the profect~ No 16) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term noise associated with construction I e sawing hammenng etc '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees The project Involves removal of all trees as recommended by the Arborist report except for the two Palm trees which will be relocated The protect Involves planting of 64 trees of various types and numerous shrubs on the front yards and streets 17) Indicate any bodies o(water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drains None • ~ EnvironmentallnfoFOrm1 -East Ave Protect • Des, Dev, TTM Page 4 Created on 6/16/2003 10 35 AM 18) Indtcate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County WaterOtstnct at 987-2591 a Restdenhal (gaUday) 7.755 00 Peak use (gal/Day) b Commeraal/Ind (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indtcate proposed method of sewage disposal ®Sept~c Tank ^ Sewer if septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests ll discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591 a Restdenhal (gal/day) b Commercial/Industrial (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Num6ero/restdenhal unds 11 Detached (indicate range of parcel sues, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Average 15,567 Range of parcel sizes 13,415 - 20,892 SF Mln lot size 13,415SF Max lot size 20,892 SF Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or for sale units) 21) Anhctpated range of sale prices and/or rents Sale Price(s) $600 000 00 to $650 000 00 Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number oI bedrooms by unit type Model 1 5BR Modell 66R 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type Model 1 4 Modell 4 D, ~. , m 2S EnvironmentallnfoForml -East Ave Project -Des Dev, TiM Page 5 Created on 6/16!2003 70 35 AM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary 6 b Junior High 6 c Semor High 10 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o/use(s) and ma/or function(s) o/ commercra/, industrial or mshtuhonal uses 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Numbero/employees Total Maximum Shift Time o/ Maxmum ShrR 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated /ob c/assiticatrons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o(the rate of hire for each classification (attach adddional sheet i/necessary) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City '31) Forcommemial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount ofairpollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) \~.m 2.~ EnvironmentallnfoFormi • East Ave Prgect -Des. Dev, TiM Page 6 Created on 6116/2003 10 35 AM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, tire, and flood control agencies serving fhe protect been contacted to determine their ability [o • provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ 1/ so, please indicate them response Water - CCWD has been contacted Formal application well be filed after the tentative tract map has been approved Sewer - N/A Fire -Need to annex to CFD 85-1 for fire protection services Flood control -City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeennq department has reviewed proposed drainage discharge into Interim Basin No 5 and has confirmed necessary capacity based on first come, first served order 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not Irmrted to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, it known None disclosed by Land Owner 34) Will the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed abovev if yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~ ~~ ~.--3 Signature v ~- c~~ 1'l~~''~t/1~6L Tdle Member • EnvironmentallnfoFOnnt -East Ave Protect -Des, Dev, TiM Page 7 Created on 6/16/2003 10 35 AM LE 30" •.., ROAD CLASSIFICATION ~~o~v ~' y Hearyduty"_ _ Light~duty__ ~s4v~ Medmm-duly- Ummproved dirt...-..... Interstate Route ~ U S Route O State Route GUF Purple tint indicates a#ension of urban areas Rid/cRSIDE BIUEPRiNTUCAMONGAc IPE AK~ocALIF. au~Dn~r+ctrtDOLnoN 4245 }.t,i+,t STnEET 3x117-B5-TF-024 Rlvr-.;;';,F CA 92501 Revisions shown m purple and woodland com0~led~t{9!P ~ ~UO-Q5 ,3~ 1966 " aerial photographs taken 1985 and other source d }}~a ~ 1 ~\ ~ ~ PHOTOREVISED 1988 Partial check by U 5 Forest Service Map edited 1988 DMA 252 11 NE-SERIES V895 Y Q ~~ ear ~ r v i[Lf~ I Of ~ ~ ~ A - _~ o~ G e ~ n i9 as I h M M1 1 n h m 1 ~ "' 3 ~ ~ r ~ 1- I ~ i ar ~( 6 N If „ `N`` ~~ o R <r ~ ~ o ~ ,_ «~ 1 ~ s,95 K ~~ g , .sa rsg n ~ ~1 L_ I a ~ s , ~ , ~.~ I _ i2a ~~ O ..~. - ~ - ~~ _ ~- D, E~ a8a -~ ll7 fD r O N t` O m 3 0 a N N 7 c d 'o v f _a frl 3 p~E,c`(~'~J r - , ~'~, ;~ ~~ .~ ~~ .~ • ~•.i, ~. ~"'., i p~E,~ 33 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: SUBTT16542 i£ DRC2003-00602 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00603, Variance DRC2003-00604 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16542 - J T STORM - A request to subdivide 4.92 acres into 11 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the east side of East Avenue, 150 feet south of Highland Avenue -APN 0227-071-24 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM - A request to develop 11 single-family homes on 3 93 acres located in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) on the east side of East Avenue, 150 feet south of Highland Avenue -APN 0227-071-24 4. Prolect Sponsor's Name and Address: J T. Storm Development No 2 LLC P.O Box 2428, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-2428 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The setting consists of a predominantly vacant parcel of land with a slope of about 2 percent with Eucalyptus windrows on or near the north, east, and southern property lines The parcel contains asingle-family residence and large detached garage that are both proposed for demolition The parcel is bounded by an existing housing development to the North, Etiwanda High School to the east, a residential lot to the south and East Avenue to the West. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is requued (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases ~ t ~ , • i f~ J Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or °Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 (x) Aesthetics () Biological Resources OHazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems (x) Agricultural Resources ()Cultural Resources (x) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (x) Noise ORecreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (x) Air Quality ()Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a signrficant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a °Potentially Significant Impact° or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required Prepared By Date ) Z' I b G Reviewed B Date ~~ e G D, ~,~ 3S Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Lssv 71ten $,pvficant LelS Issues and Supporting Information Sources $,pryficant Mi paom SiptYfirent No I Into etl I I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect. a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantlally damage scenic resources, Including, but () () (/) ( ) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantlally degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and Its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime wows in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 r~ LJ b) The protect site contains a Eucalyptus windrow on the north property line The applicant • will remove the trees and replace at a 1 to 1 ratio on site There are two Palm Trees that the applicant will transplant on site The Etiwanda Specific Plan allows for removal and replacement of trees, therefore, the impact is considered less than significant No scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways wlthln the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the east side of East Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and south, Etiwanda High School by the East, and East Avenue to the west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract • D\c~~~ ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 ~~ 5 ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~n °~°",,; µ ~~, s, ~,,a i i .m ~ i c) Involve other changes m the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the east side of East Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and south, Et~wanda High School to the east, and East Avenue to the west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-thud is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located m the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a signrficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the Cdy c) The site is located on the east side of East Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and south, Etiwanda High School to the east, and East Avenue to the west. Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated. u 3. AIR t]UALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitatnre thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sens~trve receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () Q concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people D~ E, ~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTTi6542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less 71bn SpNfioeM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ~f°°'~ Ipuficent "'"" A4upsnon T"~" Sipsfirerll No I I t~ I I Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development well contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the prolect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specdications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Las 71bn 9pNficant Lma Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ r ~ ~~, s, N, • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (I.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) In accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. • 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water duality Control Board [W~CB]) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain sigmficant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 56) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 56-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be requved to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-strapping. Q , E, ~c'~ `~1 Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 ~., ~ s~oNrcam Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~~'"°'~„'; M, ~~, s~ „~ i ~., ~~ ~~a i ~ After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels m the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide mcrease in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overndmg Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified m SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic av contaminants identified m SCAOMD Rule . 1401 The protect site is located adtoining sensitive receptors, including residences and a high school The mitigation measures listed under b above will reduce impact to a level of less than significant e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either dvectly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any speces identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means • D, ~. ~ r(1 y,0 • • Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~~ siptlbcvil tma Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~„~,~cel„ Mitlyebm Sip bn do Nu I ed Inco rotetl I m:l 1 d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or wdh established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (/) () Q protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments• a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Pfan FEIR, the prolect srte is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are a total of 37 heritage trees on-site including two Palm trees and the Eucalyptus windrows located along the north property line The applicant has filed a Tree Removal Permit application DRC2003-00603 to remove ail trees There are also Eucalyptus windrows located off-site near the south and east property lines that may be adversely impacted by proposed construction An arborist study (Borer, April 29, 2003) was prepared to assess the health and condition of the on-site trees The study concluded that the Eucalyptus trees were in poor condition, with gross structural defects, hence, recommended removal The study concluded that the Palm trees were healthy and suitable for preservation by relocation on site Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The two Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting on site. • 2) The Eucalytus windrow shall be removed and replaced along the north property line with 15 gallon Eucalyptus Maculate (Spotted Gum), planted 8 feet on center and irrigated. If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soli, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Lw Tun Siprcficem Lana Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~~~~ 0 M wan patron m.a SpnlficaM No I nn Inco ed 1 act I act movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. 3) Special construction techniques shall be used along the south and east property lines to protect the off-site Eucalyptus windrows. No trenching or grading (cut or fill) shall be done within 10 feet of the tree trunks. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site, including the existing residence and detached garage proposed fro demolition, has not been identified as a °Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. p, ~~c`n y2 Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 ~~ sipruficBnt Les9 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'BnOa'Y $ipnficant w"" Miugaoon '"°" 9prvfiraM No I loco atetl ~ ~ Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEGIA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last °Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated. D,E,~y3 Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 ~,m~ e~~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources. ~~~;'„ ~ ~~, s ,,o i c ~~ ~ ~ ~ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect• a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist forthe area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Drvision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction nr) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that woukf become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result m on- or off-sde landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or coliapse~ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is R in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Faun, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill FaulUEtiwanda Avenue Scarp, passes within 1 75 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Faun Zone lies approximatety 2 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producng Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„. 7 5 earthquakes is 11 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Bulding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant ~~ b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction actroities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following O,E,c`n `'~`~ Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 ~ m~ spa~nc Lms Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,a„ °~;,; M, ~~, 5p ~,,, r,,, ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated . with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The prolect would not withdraw water from the existing agwfer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Tulunga Gravelly Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The malonty of Rancho Cucamonga, including the prolect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Sod types onsite consist of Tulunga Gravelly Loamy Sand association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils are typically slow to very slow runoff with little erosion hazard due to gravelly surface layer. No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school p,E,~ yS Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 ~, meo Sit>trfinre Lela Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PotentB1y sie~~ """' M,upaem Th8" Sipaficam No I act Inco feE I I d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous matenals sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the enwronment~ e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the wcindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impav implementation of or physically mtertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () (/) () loss, injury or death mvolwng wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Matenals Diwsion that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous matenals and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant, impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Matenals Diwsion that is more comprehensive than any other m the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There is a high school adjoining the project site to the east Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated D~t~~ ~~ • Irntial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 ~~ s,w+r~cem ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po'~ °~;;,; M„~,~ s, ~„ No e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Prolect site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • g) The Citys Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes pollees and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District in the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticpated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire m the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the Cily according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005 The proposed prolect site is located w~thm an area of high probability of fire risk according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 Anew fire station is under construction on East Avenue, approximately 1 mile to the north The prolect has been designed with two points of access and to accommodate access by emergency vehicles The prolect developer will be regwred to pay their fair share of Commurnty Facilities District fees for construction of new stations and fire personnel The prolect will install new fire hydrants The level of impact is considered less than significant. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ech a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (} (/} regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit rn aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) 0 , E, c~ `'~`~' Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 ~~ svNno~l I.ms Issues and Supporting Information Sources so~~;;,; µ"r"" petlon Th°" SipNfna,l No 1 IMro ~ I I g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed project will not deplete • groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Pian Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a signficant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and • amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 ~~ Siproficam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources 9ryfi~'"91~,,'; M„~ on s~, ~ Ne I an Irico t~ I ct ~ en and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is not mare than 1 acre, therefore, is regwred to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce levels to less-than-significant levels 2) Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit.. g) If residential include this sentence The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system ~s substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 ~,1n., s~ncem ~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 P"Bn°a'Y sy,urcem "~"' Mmpanm "'°' s,oryr~~ No i ~nco ~aa i ~., i the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proled. a) Physically dmde an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located on the east side of East Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and south, Etiwanda High School by the East, and East Avenue to the west The protect will become a part of the larger community The protect design includes a public street connecting to the existing neighborhood to the north No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Pian 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, speafic plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact ~1~~~ So • Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Las., men SipNM1CaN LBSa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g ?otanaelly Sipnificent wnn MNpason men Significant No I p Inco rates I ect I b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result tn~ a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protlsct~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Future noise levels are expected to exceed 60dBA and 65dBA within 171 and 79 feet, respectively, of the centerline of East Avenue according to General Plan Table V-6 A noise study was prepared (BridgeNet, August 7, 2003) that concluded exterior and interior noise levels would exceed City standards. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Noise barriers, 5.5 feet higher than house pad grade elevation, shall be constructed along the west property line of the lots adjacent to East Avenue and shall wrap around their north and south property lines. 2) An interior noise analysis of all homes in this project shall be prepared prior to issuance of building permits. The analysis shall determine appropriate sound attenuation methods to provide at least a 21.5 dB of exterior-to-interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's standard of 45dB. The home design shall implement the recommendations of the interior noise analysis. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and generate noise exceeding City standards The following mitigate the short-term noise impacts D,E,rn 5~ a construction phase, on-site construction equipment, will measures are provided to Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 I.eaa m~ SipnificaM I... Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P0'e""~'Y Significant v""' Mltlpatlan TI'°" Sipmflcarlt No I Inco ratetl I act I acl 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible In first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • r1 I._J p, E, cc~ 52 Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 ~~ $ipnfKaM Lav Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'~nh~"Y SiBlaficanl W"" Miupaoon '"°" SipNficant No 1 act Into tetl I act I 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the prolect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated. b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected L_ J c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the prowsron of new or physrcally altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause srgnrf~cant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other peAormance ob/ect~ves for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments. a) The site is located on the east side of East Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and south, Etiwanda High School by the East, and East Avenue to the west Anew fire station is under construction on East Avenue, approximately 1 mile to the north The prolect has been designed with two points of access and to accommodate access by emergency vehicles The prolect developer will be required to pay their fair share of Community Facilities District fees for construction of new stations and fire personnel The prolect will install new fire hydrants The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated D,E~c~ S3 Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Lae., lnen 9pNfieem Lmv Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Frnerroally s~pruficaN wM MNpaeon 1T~ SipNficent Na I IMO tad I I b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site Is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union Hlgh School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school Impact fees Wuh this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park Is located 3/4 of a mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decllne in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facllltles A standard condition of approval will requlre the developer to pay park development fees No Impacts are anticipated LJ e) The proposed protect will utilize exlsting public facllltles. The site Is In a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the constructlon of any new facllltles or alteratlon of any existing facllltles or cause a decllne In the levels of servlce, which could cause the need to construct new facllltles Cumulative • development within Rancho Cucamonga will Increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected Increase in Ilbrary space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR Identified the cumulative Impact on Ilbrary servlces as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which Is In excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faculties such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect Include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing . any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an Increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No Impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above D `~ \ ~ CJU Initial Study for SUBTTi6542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Leas Than 9pnficent Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. PP g vmerma~lr Significant wnn Mibpabon Than SipMficam No 1 act Inco n3tad I ad I 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project a) Cause an Increase In traffic which Is substantial In () () () (/) relation to the existing trafflc load and capacity of the street system (I a ,result in a substantlal increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections) b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result In a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results In substantlal safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or Incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result In inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in Inadequate parking capaclty~ () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development well contribute to the trafflc load In the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. The protect Is In an area that Is mostly developed with street improvements exlsting or Included In protect design The protect will not create a substantial Increase In the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the Clry has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, Is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic Impact analysis The protect Is in an area that Is mostly developed with all street Improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect well be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and well not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 ~, me„ Significant lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g '°'a'"~"Y SignifieeM W"" Miogason '"a" 9pnificant No I act Inco raleC I I d) The prolect Is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous Intersections or fanning uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No Impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an Inadequate emergency access No Impacts are anticipated The prolect design has adequate parking In compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an Inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The prolect design Includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the prolect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result In the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new stone () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing faculties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that It has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste L_J L_~ Comments a) The proposed prolect Is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The prolect Is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated D,~~t~ 5~ Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 ~ ~, Sipnficenl Lus Issues and Supportin Information Sources P~Bn°~"Y `""" "'°" g Sipnifiegnt MNgatlon 9gmfitent No I en Ineo o2ted I I acl b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant. i d) The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • 77. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 ~~~ Signficant LeAv Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'8n0B1y Spmfirant win, Mnigaogn '"°" 9gruficent No I eci Inco tetl I I e[t i Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, d is unlikely that any endangered or rare speaes would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwldout in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement • of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update a (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) D, E., tY1 ~d Initial Study for SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602- JT Storm City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 (x) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) Arbonst study (Borer, April 29, 2003) Geotechnical Investigation (RMA, May 21, 2003) Soil Percolation Report (RMA, May 13, 2003) • p~E , ~ 5~ Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16542 & DRC2003-00602- JT Storm Page 27 . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Inltlal Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Irntial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no~sign~ific/aunt environ/mental effects would occur Applicant's Signature• ~~ "`~~ ~` 41~Lc~~- Date ~ Z - ~~ ~ 0 3 Pnnt Name and Title ~ Y ~ t-U l~ -A- (i,~ ~ "~'~_7 ~ ~ iL . i \plenrnng\hnaf~pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-OOfi02_is revdoc doc `.J D, E, t`n lefl i City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the Cali/ornra Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 and Development Review DRC2003-00602 Public Review Period Closes: January 14, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: J T Storm Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the east side of East Avenue, 150 feet south of Highland Avenue - APN~ 0227-071-24 Project Description: A request to subdivide 4 92 acres tnto 11 lots and to develop 11 single-family homes on 3 93 acres m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan FINDING This is to advise that the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine If the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate~he effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the prolect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period January 14, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO 04-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO SUBTT16542, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 11 LOTS ON 4 92 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATEDAT 6717 EASTAVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-071-24 A Recitals 1 J T Storm filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No 16542, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherHnth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 6717 East Avenue with a street frontage of 330 feet and lot depth of 589 feet and is presently vacant with one residence slated for demolition, and b The properties to the north and south of the subtect sde are single-family residential, the property to the east is Etiwanda High School, and the property to the west is vacant, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on September 15, 2003, to mfonn the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain feedback, and . 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows D, E., ~ l~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0405 SUBTT16542 - J T. STORM January 14, 2004 Page 2 a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4 Based upon the facts and infomtation contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wall have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there ~s no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Decaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference D.Et(~ ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0405 SUBTT16542 - J T. STORM January 14, 2004 Page 3 Plamm~g Division 1) All Conditions of Approval of Development Review DRC2003-00602 and Variance DRC2003-00604 shall apply 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00603 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site. The applicenUdevelopershsll be regwred to remove, relocate, and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources Conditions The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of bwldmg and/or grading permits 3) The perimeter wall along East Avenue shall be made of a decorative material and designed as the East Avenue theme wall was intended with a combination of real river rock, pilasters, and planter areas, consistent with the Etrvvanda Speufic Plan. 4) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall material, subject to review and approval by the City Planner 5) The applicant shall get written permission from adjacent property . owners for any off-site grading, prior to issuance of grading permts. 5) The developer shall provide a 12-inch continuous footing to be installed every 3 feet along the southern property Ime of the existing sod surface The continuous footing shall be hand dug, and a temporary fence shall be installed at the nearest encroachment to the trees to prevent trauma to the trees during grading and construction 6) The Eucalyptus gees, which are being retained, shall be trimmed to reduce the possibility of shedding branches, and the entire root shall be treated, prior to grading to assist with tree stability Enomeenna Division 1) Prior to issuance of bwldmg permts, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Dmsion when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety. Fore CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 2) East Avenue frontage improvements to be m accordance with "Special • Collector" and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following D, E, ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J T. STORM January 14, 2004 Page 4 a) Provide curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, street trees, and asphak pavement, per Figure 5-28 of the Etrvvanda Specafic Plan b) Provde theme wall per Figure 5-28A of the Etrvvanda SpeGfic Plan c) No dnveways shall be constructed on East Avenue frontage d) Prowde or protect existing 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights perCdy Standards e) Provide R26 "No Pariang" signs and traffic stnpmg and signage, as required 3) Proposed internal street improvements to be in accordance with "Local Residential" standards, including, but not limited to, the follownng. a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, dnve approaches, street trees, and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights per Gty Standards. c) Provide traffic stnpmg and signage, as regwred d) Proposed cul-de-sac shall be designed per City Standard No. 111. 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncel, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of the northerly protect boundary to the first pole off site south of the southerly project boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted costfor undergroundmg from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within suc months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall tertninate 5) Development vwthm Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is requred to install master plan storm drains and mtenm basins as follows a) Intenm Basin No 5 and the storm dram m East Avenue were constructed by Tract 15912 Subfect project can satisfy its condition to install storm drams through the payment of fees However, those fees do not cover the mtenm basin The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related D, E,rc~ l~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J.T. STORM January 14, 2004 Page 5 facilities (outlet, etc ). They must request reimbursement with suc months of public improvement acceptance by the City Therefore, this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912 If reimbursement is not requested within suc months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned b) The Final Drainage Study shall assess the existing basin capacity taking into account areas tnbutary to the catch basins on the north side of the East Avenue/Victona Avenue intersection and on the north side of Victona Avenue at Pecan Avenue. Calculate 0100 from the proposed tract to venfy the capacity of East Avenue (010 dry lane) and the basin. c) Any mitigation measures identiried m the Final Drainage Study (local stone dram, enlarge basin) shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 7) The dnve approach for Lot 1 shall be constructed as far from the "End of Curb Return" (ECR) as possible to reduce conflicts between backing out and blind nght turn movements from East Avenue. 8) The developer, pnor to public improvement acceptance by the Gty, shall install pnvately maintained landscaping and imgation along the side yards of Lot 1 and 11 along East Avenue Improvements are to be installed to the street curb Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, with the exception of street trees 9) This pro/ect is connected to or ~nnll disrupt an existing Crty-maintained landscape and imgation area along East Avenue Pnor to new construction, a point inspection and documentation of the exstng area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing imgation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required, pnor to the City's acceptance of the new area Environmental Mitigation Arr Oualrty 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall '~ ~ ~ ~'(`~ IQIP PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0405 SUBTT16542 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 6 ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficetion. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submd construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planrnng staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance Huth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Gty if sik is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high Hnnds (i a ,Hand speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance Huth Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board ~t~~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J T STORM • January 14, 2004 Page 7 [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize elednc or Gean altemaLve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure thatconstruction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping . Bro/ogica/ Resources a) The two Palm shall be preserved by transplanting on site b) The Eucalyptus windrow shall be removed and replaced along the north property line Huth 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) planted 8 feet on center and imgated If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed, and buned at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges Nnth soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing Irve borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5. c) Special construction techniques shall be used along the south and east property lines to protect the off-site Eucalyptus windrows No trenching or grading (cut or fill) shall be done wdhin 10 feet of the tree trunks Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to morntor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect • or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Nell V t Eta SOU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 • Page 8 • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites ~nnthin new developments, using their speGal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of • the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the follov~nng measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allowthe rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bemardino County Museum Geologic Prob/ems 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 D, E, ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J T STORM • January 14, 2004 Page 9 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated v~nth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration inGude Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and becks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the • City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that vnll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the stone dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 3) Pnorto issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply vnth obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Pennit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Pemnt Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Noise bamers, 5 5 feet higher than house pad grade elevation, shall be • constructed along the west property line of the lots adjacent to East Avenue and shall wrap around their north and south property lines D, E, ~ ~-o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0405 SUBTT16542 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 10 3) An interior noise analysis of all homes in this protect shall be prepared prior to issuance of bwlding permits The analysis shall determine appropriate sound attenuation methods to prowde at least a 21.5 d6 of exterior-to-intenor noise reduction in order to meet the City's standard of 45dB The home design shall implement the recommendations of the interior noise analysis 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planrnng Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Diwsion If noise levels exceed the above standards, then constructwn activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance v~nth above noise standards or halted 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I•-1 U C~ • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-05 SUBTT16542 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 11 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the folloHnng vote-to-vdt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS• NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS D, E, ~`f1 '~-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As momtonng • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provde appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances regwring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. QtE,~ ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16542 and DRC2003-00602 Applicant: J.T Storm Develoament Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Wimer. Assistant Planner Date: December 9, 2003 ... .. •. .. Air Quality - ~ - _ .e~~, ' : -' 4 }w ti ,. ;t51~ ~ K e ~ '~5,: w a ,i„ x °.w, ~ , , ha i ~r~-. ~~~ =-~-}ar3~x~ ~ 4k 4w.„'h+r : ate' a `~ ?'~ All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permds, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 _C 1 0! . . .. . . . . . ... .. . • -. ~. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended perods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C During A q by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordancewith construction Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,e emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters c 1? 7 2of7 ~i .. ,. .. ~ .. .. . .. . . All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources ~ ~ , ,. The two Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting CP C/D During A 3/4 on site Construction The Eucalyptus windrow shall be removed and replaced CP C/C During A 3/4 along the north property line with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Construction Maculata (Spotted Gum), planted 8 feet on center and irrigated If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 Special construction techniques shall be used along the CP C During A 4 south and east property lines to protect the off-site Construction Eucalyptus windrows No trenching or grading (cut or fill) shall be done within 10 feet of the tree trunks Cultural Resources ~ ~ " ;:~~~: ` - a , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiw4es, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value . 3 0~ .. . ~ .. ~ ~. . .. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3l4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D p documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report 3/4 proposed mitigation of resources within the protect ~ area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of AID q field survey of the protect sde The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limded to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notdy the monitor of the find 4 of 7 C .. .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum .. .. - ~ 'Geologic Problems - ` ~" "°` ~ ' ;;%~~ , ~ '~ y , - . h ..h ~ aS ~' 4 The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BOlCE C Dunng A T ~ 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shaii be swept according to a CE C During q schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During q 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng q 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or mare to reduce PM~o emissions .-., Hydrology anii Water Ouahty~, " ~ ' v 'u ~s ~,'S~,~•`~~'ti,~; - -~., -, , tie d' re ~ 'l~~°: x - - ~ ' ~~~ '`'y `~~~i~~"" ~ ~ , v~;5, Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C Z4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins 5 0~ .. ... , ~. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and ~dentitying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 214 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise - - ;~' ;`k '.~,,,,,:~• i .r' :~Fe S - ` .`N •,:~-, ~t• Q~ .. n ~, ~ s~•;.x:•. i., - - '~' ~: ~,,.-, ;w. Pn-.,'~"33'~2 .'f,h ~ , ;•, gr •.':sr "~~~' a F` . ^ ~~ ~ U -~ ~,.. s:~. j"~~ t(: ~ ~~ ~ _ . a . ~7; ^:in+~ . :~4." ~-s . .,e~ ik ~'tv ~ ~. e.~f 5 ).'ta :f:tn ..» Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Noise barriers, 5 5 feet higher than house pad grade CP D During AIC 2/3 elevation, shall be constructed along the west property Construction I~ne of the lots adjacent to East Avenue and shall wrap around their north and south property lines An interior noise analysis of all homes in this project CP/BO B/C/D Plan Check 8 AIC 2/3 shall be prepared prior to issuance of bulding permits During The analysis shall determine appropriate sound Construction attenuation methods to provide at least a 21 5 dB of exterior-to-interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's standard of 45dB The home design shall implement the recommendations of the interior noise analysis 6of7 C m .. " ... -. ~. . ~. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C Durng q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development ' Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ _~, "' 'MonltoringFrequert`cy-na~'t~t~ ,Method, ofVerificatioriry~~~~`?~,~"'""'x' ~ ',Sanctions;~',',""4`-'~~`-" ~~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspedion 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construdicn C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certficate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposd or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation i lplanning\final\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-00602mmcklst doc 7 O~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16542 SUBJECT: A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 4 92 ACRES INTO 11 LOTS APPLICANT: J.T. STORM LOCATION: 6717 EAST AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, as agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relmgwsh such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date oithe approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits • 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Comoletion Date ~~- ~~- ~___/ ~~. -/~. SC-10-03 1 D I Et ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT16542 Completion Date 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~ ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldtng permit Issuance . 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~__J_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ~~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's penmeter D. Landscaping 1. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included to ~~_ the requred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Division. 2 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering ~~_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along East Avenue. 3. Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~_ penmeter of this project area shalt be continuously maintained by the developer 4 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located In public maintenance areas, the ~~ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. Environmental E . 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the ~~_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwldtng materials and construction techniques provided, and rf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of ail mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Clty staff time to monitor and report on the mtigation measures. Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit. F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits sataos s ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT16542 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR S COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Diwsion Protect Number (i e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet° signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Bulding and Safety Diwsion staff for information and submittal requirements H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e., SUBTT16542) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and ali other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mafor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-10-03 3 D I ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~___/. ~~- ~~- ~~. -/~- -/~. Protect No SUBTT16542 Comolehon Dete 1. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property Irne clearances considering use, area, and fve-resistiveness. Provde compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'high wind" instructions. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwldtng and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia registered Crvil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, communitytrails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the City ~~ -/___/ ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~_ ___/~_ ~___/_ ~~ r~ LJ sc-~aos a fl ~ t ~ ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT16542 Completion Data L. • Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefaalities, communltytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bwlding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as requred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to' Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Sido- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trell Other East Avenue x x (e) x (f) 4 Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) 5 feet wide. (f) provide theme wall per Figure 5-28A of Etiwanda Specific Plan. Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the CIry Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condut with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~. ~-~_ -~-~- SC-10.03 5 ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT16542 Completion Date f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure perinits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mln. Grow Street Name Botanical NamO Common Name Space Spaeing Slze' Oly. Brownstone Place P.A greater than Magnolia NCN 8' 30' o c 15-gal RII in 8' grandiflora P.A less than 8' Magnolia NCN 3' 20' o.c. 15-gal G randiflora 'St Mary Provide Street Select appropriate Name tree from the approved street tree list for Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Foreground tree Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30 o c 5-gal camaldulensis Use in larger planters as a Genera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o c. 15-gal background tree 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees. 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Droision 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required ~~ ~~- ~ ~~- ~~_ J~ ~~ SC-10-03 6 ~) ~ ~ ~ v~ Protect No SUBTT76542 Comoletion Date . M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to Loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permtts whichever occurs fvst Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. N. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permtts, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requtred by the City Engineer 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is requtred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first • Such letter must have been Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involved A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • ~~_ ~~- ~J- ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~. ~~ ~~- sc-to-os 7 ~I~~m $~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS • FD PLAN REVIEW#: DRC2003-00602 PROJECT #: DRC2003-00602 PROJECT NAME: Tract 16542 DATE: September 10, 2003 PLAN TYPE: 11 home sites SFR APPLICANT NAME: Watkins OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): 4800 + inc garage. TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED None LOCATION: 6717 East Ave FD REVIEW BY: Mosses Eskenazi, Sr plans examiner PLANNER: Emil,W.me:,.,,,,,.,,~,,,.,,,.~ri.~,,,,~~„ THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Please pay the balance of fees owed to the Fire District. Pay $132.00 at the FCS counter. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, and Technical information applicable to the above project. FSC-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing ai location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft b Fire hydrants are to be located 1)At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisioi and industrial parks D,E,m ~~ 3)On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4)As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5)The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6) Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any bwlding Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains• Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 4 Single-family Residential Plans• For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants. Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Retlechve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be wsible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Fire Distract Forms and Letters Note. If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Planning Division referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included. Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters. The forms and letter are also found m previously issued Fire Distract comments. p, E, m X10 . RESOLUTION NO 04-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-00602 TO DEVELOP 11 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 3 93 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 6717 EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-071-24 A. Rentals 1. J T Stonn filed an applicatron for the approval of Development Review No DRC2003-00602, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to property located at 6717 East Avenue with a street frontage of 330 feet and lot depth of 589 feet and is presently vacant with one residence slated for demolition, and b The properties to the north and south of the subtect site are single-family residential, the property to the east is Etiwanda High School, and the property to the west is vacant, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on September 15, 2003, to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain feedback, and e The proposed use is in close proximity to a transportation network that is consistent with community goals. The protect would in-fill single-family residences near the 210 Freeway 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~ ~ ~~ C'c1 ~1\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 • Page 2 a The proposed project is consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherv~nth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negabve Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance v~nth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the ~ independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wdh regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) All Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 and Vanance DRC2003-00604 shall apply. p ~ E, t^cl ~Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J T. STORM • January 14, 2004 Page 3 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00603 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site. The applicanUdevelopershell be required to remove, relocate, and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Biological Resources Conditions The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading perrnRs 3) The perimeter wall along East Avenue shall be made of a decorative matenal and designed as the East Avenue theme wall was intended with a combination of real over rock, pilasters, and planter areas, consistent with the Etrvvanda Specific Plan 4) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 5) The applicant shall get written permission from adjacent properly owners for any off-site grading poor to issuance of grading permits. 6) The developer shall provide a 12-inch continuous footing to be installed every 3 feet along the southern property line of the existing soil surface . The continuous footing shall be hand dug, and a temporary fence shall be installed at the nearest encroachment to the trees to prevent trauma to the trees dunng grading and construction 7) The Eucalyptus trees, which are being retained, shall be trimmed to reduce the possibility of shedding branches, and the entire root shall be treated poor to grading to assist with tree stability Enaineennra Division 1) Prior to issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Gty. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Forrn CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project 2) East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Special Collector" and the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards, including but not limited to the following a) Provide curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, street trees, and asphak • pavement, per Figure 5-28 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan b) Provide theme wall per Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan ~ ~ ~ ~ n1 ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J T. STORM January 14, 2004 . Page 4 c) No dnveways shall be constructed on East Avenue frontage d) Provde or protect existing 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights per City Standards e) Provide R26 "No Parlung" signs and traffic stnpmg and signage, as required 3) Proposed internal street improvements to be in accordance v~nth "Local Residential" standards, inGuding, but not limited to, the following a) Provide curb and gurier, sidewalk, dnve approaches, street trees, and asphalt pavement, as requred. b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights per City Standards c) Provide traffic stnpmg and signage, as required d) Proposed cul-de-sac shall be designed per City Standard No 111. 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, • except for the 66 kV electncal) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of the northerly protect boundary to the first pole off site south of the southerly protect boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for laid reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate 5) Development within Etnvanda/San Sevaine Area 8 is required to install master plan storm drams and intenm basins as follows a) Intenm Basin No 5 and the storm dram in East Avenue were constructed by Tract 15912 Subject protect can satisfy its condition to install storm drains through the payment of fees However, those fees do not cover the intenm basin The developer of Tract 15912 is eligible to request reimbursement for the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) They must request reimbursement with suc months of public improvement acceptance by the City Therefor:, this development will need to deposit $5,000 per gross acre with the City for the purpose of reimbursing the developer of Tract 15912 If reimbursement is not requested within suc months of public improvement acceptance, the deposit will be returned D, E, m ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 5 b) The Final Drainage Study shall assess the existing basin capacity taking into account areas tnbutary to the catch basins on the north side of the East Avenue/Victona Avenue intersection and on the north side of Victona Avenue at Pecan Avenue. Calculate Q100 from the proposed tract to venfy the capacity of East Avenue (Q10 dry lane) and the basin. c) Any mitigation measures identified in the Final Drainage Study (local storm dram, enlarge basin) shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 7) The dnve approach for Lot 1 shall be constructed as far from the "End of Curb Retum" (ECR) as possible to reduce conflicts between backing out and blind right tum movements from East Avenue. 8) The developer, pnor to public improvement acceptance by the City, shall install pnvately maintained landscaping and imgation along the side yards of Lot 1 and 11 along East Avenue Improvements are to be installed to the street curb Plans for these areas will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, with the exception of street trees. 9) This protect is connected to or will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and imgation area along East Avenue Pnor to new construction, a toint inspection and documentation ofthe ewsLng area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the Gty inspector The existing imgation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required, pnor to the City's acceptance of the new area Environmental Mtigation Arr Qua/dy 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading pennits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide D,E,m ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 6 evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment moll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Qualty Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibildy of large areas to erosion . over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance ninth local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if siR is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high mends (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions D, E, m ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM • January 14, 2004 Page 7 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altemaUve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditiornng, appliances and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane wnndows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) Transplanting on-site shall preserve the two Palm trees 2) The Eucalyptus windrow shall be removed and replaced along the north property line with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculate (Spotted Gum) planted • 8 feet on center and imgated If any Eucalyptus wood is infested wrath borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of suc months, sealing the tarp edges wrath sod, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing hve borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or traders is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5 3) Special construction techniques shall be used along the south and east property lines to protect the off-site Eucalyptus wnndrows No trenching or grading (cut or fill) shall be done within 10 feet of the tree trunks Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wall • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speual qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage D, E~ m ~~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 • Page 8 Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdelines. ^ Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wnthin the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, month onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the foltovnng measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils v~nth minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities . • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speGmens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum Geologic Problems 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance month SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated wrath vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be . applied to all inadrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions D t ~ ~ (n ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 9 Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, ten'aces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Pnor to issuance of budding pennits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the mawmum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2000 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining . coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineerforcoverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Noise bamers, 5 5 feet higher than house pad grade elevation, shall be constructed along the west property line of the lots adjacent to East Avenue and shall wrap around their north and south property lines 3) An intenor noise analysis of all homes in this protect shall be prepared pnor to issuance of building permits The analysis shall determine appropnate sound attenuation methods to provide at least a 21 5 d6 of extenor-to-intenor noise reduction in order to meet the City's standard of 45dB The home design shall implement the recommendations of the intenor noise analysis 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Plannng Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning fl~E~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-06 DRC2003-00602 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 10 Drvision within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance vwth above noise standards or halted 5) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 6) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the follovnng vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. L _~ r~ Dt~t~ ,~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00602 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect Reports wtll be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D,~,r~ log Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-00602 Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the Cary staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to momtor specific mitigation actmties and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible Cary department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible Cary department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. D,E~ tt1 1~Z MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16542 and DRC2003-00602 Applicant: _ J T Storm Development Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Wlmer. Assistant Planner Date: December 9. 2003 .. . - .. . ~. ~. Air Qualdy _ .. ,,~~, ~ + t #w:i~r~:• ~ 4 _ ~~~r Ail construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Rewew of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply wdh SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 _C _~ i d \}' 1 of 7 .. ~ -. . .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to mirnmize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a mirnmum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During p~ 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters ~ 2 °i • ~ • i .. .. .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C yq required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources - h _ ,. =;~ ;~= .t :r.; ; , ~;,, The two Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting CP C/D Dunng A 3/4 on site Construction The Eucalyptus windrow shall be removed and replaced CP C/C During A 3/4 along the north property line with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Construction Maculata (Spotted Gum), planted 8 feet on center and irrigated If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 Speaal construction techniques shall be used along the CP C Dunng q q south and east property lines to protect the off-site Construction 3 Eucalyptus windrows No trenching or grading (cut or fill) shall be done within 10 feet of the tree trunks 7 Cultural Resources - - -, .~ ' ~ ~ - - - -:-- If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to morntor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value 3of7 C l r~ .. -. ' -. .. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroing A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of AID 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately droert construction and notify the monitor of the find . 40~ • .. ... .. -. .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum `Geolo is Problems ~~`- °~ ~ . ~~ .;".~.;'~"<,~~ •;'`t~ • ` . - k".S f+. a < " ' '~ '' a " ' ` ~ ~ ' ~, ..~ ,.~;, u . The site shall be treated with water or other soil- e ~k i s a 1 a BO/CE i Yi C + ~ .~ +tkii J! Vr'~_ $° C~{'Se~~~u~s`~F~:-?' stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) During C q 4 daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with onstruction SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During q schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a Construction 4 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wmd BO/CE C During q 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Ouahty. , a '; ~~,` ;e,~,=°. .°~-~s -, .. ,.; . ~ ~ „ . S t ,Ck a.. ')~y' ~ ~~ "~ ~~aa~"~a ~ '~Fffi'+d F 6 '" ~V ""`'~ i ~ ~~ ~,*'" „~ ~~ 95'~ ~_ro~~~~"~y4M ~~ ~ ° ~ ' "~-~>.q~ ~ ~;, ~ t t~ ~" ° k i~ ~ , s . x : ~s 7^.fF" ~it d.'.. ! ~'Yc~i` "` T 'r h~ 7ie}'u a%A Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-sde shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 5of7 0 rn 3 .. . . . . .. .. . . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Revew of Plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdel~nes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit - ,.,.. ~; .~>~~~~a;?Hr Noise - .. - ,- ~ Y ~! :J ' ` i ,» t ~~~ '~ ~ `" v '~°T ~ '4 ~~~"°>~~§" ~~ f k; ~ • : ' S y ~ ( ,~; ~~r ~ " ~~~s,~- x~ ~~_' _~ 3~ ~ ~ + . t _ ..a n " . . . .. k wr 'h > w :.iii ~ =~~ s"i~ ~t ~ «v'gs,' Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any pine on Sunday or a national holiday Noise barriers, 5 5 feet higher than house pad grade CP D During AIC 2/3 elevation, shall be constructed along the west property Construction Ime of the lots adtacent to East Avenue and shall wrap around their north and south property lines An interior noise analysis of all homes in this protect CP/BO B/C/D Plan Check & AIC 2/3 shall be prepared prior to issuance of building permits During The analysis shall determine appropriate sound Construction attenuation methods to provide at least a 21 5 d6 of exterior-to-interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's standard of 45dB The home design shall implement the recommendations of the interior noise analysis 6 0~ .. . , ~. .. Constructlon or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Constructlon 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ilne Developer shall here a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Sectlon 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Sald consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Dlvlslon within 24 hours, however, if noise Levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Dlvlslon If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Dunng A A as possible in the first phase construcbon ' Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Constructlon including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall / prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations ,ResponsiblePer'son ~- , „ ::~;,~'~ ~~„$ CDD -Community Development Director or designee ;~IlAonitoririg~Frequeitcy~~; A -With Each New Development ~Methoil.of-,Ve~iflcatioit"v`~', t~'`"~' '='-''^ A - On-site Inspection ~Senction"sib"''~'M;~~;~~;;a'~x~~;i`T~~'><~rL' 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwldmg Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCtion C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certif rate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports (Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation I \planning\6nal\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-00602mmdclst doc 7of7 •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00602 SUBJECT: A DEVELOPMENT OF 11 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 3 93 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: J T STORM LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: iA. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, far any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Development Review is granted subtect to the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 and Variance DRC2003-00604 B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire rf building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulabons . 2 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District and the Bwldtng and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy Completion Date -~-~- -~ ~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 1 D t ~ ` m ~~O Protect No DRC2003-00602 Comolehon Date D. E. F 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordrnances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 7 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8 All butldmg numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, _/ /_ including proper dlummahon 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 10 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency ~ 11 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 12 For residential development, return walls and corner sidewalls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 13 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk _/_/_ 14 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/ products Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street _I_/_ Lan dscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/~ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision SC-10-03 2 D I ~ ` ~ `\\ Protect No DRC2003-00602 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground coverfor erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent vrigatton system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, scope banks in excess of 8 feet to vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted to staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thrmng condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan This regwrement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included to the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along East Avenue 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and tf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained to the final report 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building 8 Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 3 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used bythe Cttyto Completion Date -/-/- -~ /_ -/-/- -~ /_ _/_/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-10-03 3 p 1E1 ~ \\~ Protect N o DRC2003-00602 Comoletion Date retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forted H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _! / of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ _ mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements t Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Drnsion Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Ctty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the City pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fenang and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Droiston staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00602) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to SC-10-03 4 ~ I ~` ~ 1\~ Protect No DRC2003-00602 Comolehon Date City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits _ 4 Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Prowde compliance with the Califomia Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Prowde compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/ / 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions / / L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be m accordance with Califomia Buildrng Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to _/ / pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ • time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /_/ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Offictal prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for _/ /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Caltfomta registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/ / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment _ and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue / / . 3 Corner propert line cutoffs shall be dedicated er Cit Standards _ _ _ / / y p y _ _ _ S~.,o-03 s p, ~., ~ 1\~ Protect No DRC2003-00602 Comolekon Date N. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the City Street Improvements 1 All public Improvements (interior streets, drainage faalities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street tights, and street trees 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Councl, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as requred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trell Median Island Bike Trail Other East Avenue x x (e) x (f) 4 Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) 5 feet wide (f) Provide theme wall per Figure 5-28A of Etiwanda Specific Plan Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Ctvll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office to addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer _/_/~ -/-/- -/-/- -~ /_ -/-/- _/ / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • SC-10-03 6 V , ~1 ~ 1\~ Protect No DRC2003-00602 Comole6on Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at ail times with adequate detours dunng construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engtneer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check u Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spaung Size• ~ Brownstone FII in Place P A greater than Magnolia NCN 8' 30' o c 15-gal 8' grandiflora P A less than 8' Magnolia NCN 3' 20' o c 15-gal Grandiflora 'St Mary Provide Street Select appropriate Name tree from the approved street tree list for Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Foreground tree Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30 o c 5-gal camaldulensis Use in larger planters as a Gegera parviflora Australian W iliow 5' 20' o c 15-gat background tree SC-10-03 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans _/ /_ _/ / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- _/ / Protect No DRC2003A0602 Completion Date 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Ctty inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all pro/ect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as regwred O. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/ /_ Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer P. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/ / approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adtacent areas Q. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/' electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_I_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _I_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requrements that may be received from them R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_I_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prged No DRC2003-00602 ComoleGOn Date S. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors Ifwindows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devces T. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irked from frame or track in any manner U. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED _~ ~- / / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 9 Di~\~ l\~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: DRC2003-00602 PROJECT #: DRC2003-00602 PROJECT NAME: Tract 16542 DATE: September 10, 2003 PLAN TYPE: 11 home sites SFR APPLICANT NAME: Watkins OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): 4800 + me garage TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: None LOCATION: 6717 East Ave FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi, Sr plans examiner PLANNER, Eml~ W mer , ~ ,..,,,.,.~,.,~,,,., „~,.,.,,~~~~,,,,~,.,,,,,,,.,.,..,,,.,.,,,,,,z,,,,,,,,.~,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,~,,,.,.~,.,,,. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Please pay the balance of fees owed to fhe Fire District Pay $132.00 at the FCS counter. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS SREQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, and Technical information applicable to the above project. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft b Fire hydrants are to be located 1)At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivision and industrial parks ~ t E, ~'~l ~~`~ i 3)On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4)As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5)The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire Distract to control a fire 6) Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any bwlding Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 4 Single-family Residential Plans. For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants• Prior to issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible budding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Dvision Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "/nstallahon of Refiechve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Address Single-family. New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Fire Distract Forms and Letters Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions issued by the Planning Dvision referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included. Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters The forms and letter are also found in previously issued Fire District comments. ~~~t ~ X20 RESOLUTION NO 04-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO DRC2003-00604 TO INCREASE WALL HEIGHTS FROM 6 FEET TO 13 FEET ON THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16542 IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UINTS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 6717 EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-071-24 A Recitals 1. J T. Storrs filed an application for Vanance No. DRC2003-00604, as descnbed in the tdle of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Revew request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public heanng to consider the application, and conGuded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, detennined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referencedpublic heanng on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a. The application applies to property located at 6717 East Avenue; and b The properties to the north and south of the subted sde are single-family residential, the property to the east is Etiwanda High School, and the property to the west is Vacant; and c The applicant is requesting a Vanance (DRC2003-00604) in contundion vnth Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16542 and Development Review DRC2003-00602 for the expansion of the wall heights to allow up to a 13-foot high combination wall along to south property boundary(Lots 1-3, 5 and 6), in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a mawmum height of 6 feet. d Stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship, in that limiting wall heights at the rear of the lots would create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," with slopes that are hard to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards . e There are exceptional or extraordinary urcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct, in that the property is surrounded by residential development Creating a terrace wall design on-site would create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," v~nth slopes that are hard to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards D,E~fCI 12~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-07 DRC2003-00604 - J T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 2 f Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speufied regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvdeges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct, in that ~t would essentially reduce the usable lot sizes for those lots on the south side of the property, and create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," with slopes that are hard to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards. g Granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvdege inconsistent moth the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct, in that other properties with similar site and wall conditions would warrant the granting of a Vanance. h. Granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity, in that the wall moll be constructed per budding code and moth a decorative matenal to match existing penmeterwalls in the area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, inctuding wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds and conctudes as follows a. That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent moth the objectives of the Development Code • b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct. c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct d That the granting of the Vanance moll not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties Gassified in the same distnct e That the granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Ad (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Division 1) The penmeterwall along the south property boundary shall be made of . a decorative matenal, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0407 DRC2003-00604 - J.T STORM January 14, 2004 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chaimtan ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary • CJ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES. COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• p , E ~ ~rt1 ti23 T H E I T Y O ANCNO CUCAMONGA Sl.C.1.LL ~~~ DATE: January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY: Alan Warren, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC. - A request to subdivide 11.84 acres into 5 parcels plus public right-of-way dedication for a retail shopping center consisting of multiple pads, including a drive-through lane, and anchor tenants totaling 112,000 square feet of building area in the Regional Related Office/Commercial and Mixed Use Districts of the Victoria Community Plan at the northwest corner of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards - APN: 0227-201-39 and 44. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00617 and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00246. Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Victoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999; and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning: North - Undeveloped, Victoria Community Plan Mixed Use South - Undeveloped, Victoria Community Plan Regional Related Office/Commercial East - Undeveloped, Victoria Community Plan Mixed Use West - Utility corridor and flood control channel, Open Space and Flood Control B. General Plan Designations: Pro~ecl Site - Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - General Commercial East - Mixed Use West - Flood ControVUtility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: The site is generally level with a slight grade to the south. With the development of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, of which this site is a part, rough grading operations have been initiated on the land. A major shopping center of 45 acres ITEM "F" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP January 14, 2004 Page 2 is proposed opposite this site on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, and a shopping center extension of the Mall complex is proposed on the northeast comer. Multiple- family residential projects are antiapated north of the site. ANALYSIS: A. General• On December 10, 2003, the Planning Commission approved the development of a shopping center at the northwest corner of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards by the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00617. The applicant has submitted a parcel map to divide the site into five parcels, subfect to the site and development provisions of the approved site plan. B. Development Review Grading and Technical Review Committees: Tentative Parcel Maps are exempt from Committee Reviews, pursuant to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The shopping center plans were reviewed by the committees and the applicable conditions are incorporated into the accompanying resolution for the parcel map. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION: Since the shopping center development has been approved by the Planning Commission, staff recommends that it would be appropriate to approve the parcel map by the adoption of the draft Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:Is Attachments: Exhibit 'A° - Location Map Exhibit °B° - Tentative Parcel Map Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPMi 6365 F2 s s SUBTPM16365 .. L V O N Exhibit A ~~ Location Map Tentative Parcel Map wwe oel arw v~ura anuww- «w ~-~~, „r ; r9 YONOM1I9q piONYY '+9 4~1PR7 °°o~ ~4°Y~ 'MAY 7~'J AYG Y OAIB T1LL001 ~D ONW - Mil1a~ AYAAa1rO rWOl0Y1 w, ~~ M r _ ~~ Z~ a -- w` v' oc a.- W ~`, `~_ • ^ LW r P~' , p Iie~ ~ ~ ~ j i i ~t16 i i~ ~i tip 9309 ~ it i ° ~j 0 ~ i a ! ! ( ~ ~ ~iid E0liS ~ . ee ~° ~ ~~~ 1 i! t # `E ~~lE to ~ s ~ j ~ ~{~ ~ i 4 ~S9 ! y~ ti Fs i, .F.' ~i o ~ ~ ~ .: ,.. ~~~ ip4 s~ ~y p! ~ ~i !5t eY93~ 9 4i C i ~i ~3~ ~Y i~~~ e i s ~i~ 3~ Sid A~~~ 1~1 9~i'i ~~~~ ~ t' !' Q~ S is t i ii 3~. i~ g$9g ~ , g ~ ~~ . Fe! e a g s g !~y~ alit i `~'~ !€~4~ ~ 94 ! 9 t: ii;E ~ ~9, ~ 3i:e ~ o e s11 ~ 99i il~ ~~~~ 6i[~ SP1+ >'ii~ 9 9~ i,~ ~ II II i i! i! IU I - II II - -- !I ~ II I I , ~~ II 'III I e 'I i 11 p! I~ I I rye ~~ 1; I I 1 I ~ ~ i• i. ~ i ~J!!• i•l r~ ~~ f•7; ~e r ~~ e I I ,o eC i f 4; ~ I'o m I , I I J _ ~ _ __ J ~~ \ i ~ ~ ~~ If i O LL M1 ~ i / ~~ I• O. S! ~ ~ eve ueleT IIpY RESOLUTION NO. 0408 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. SUBTPM16365, A SUBDIVISION OF 5 PARCELS AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON 11.84 ACRES OF LAND IN THE REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIALAND MOOED USE DISTRICTS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARDS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-201- 39 AND 44. A. Recital . 1. Regency Realty Group, Inc filed an application to subdivide Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16365, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved an associated application, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00617, authorizing the development of an 11.84 acre shopping center on the subject site. 3. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 14, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northwest comer of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards, with a total street frontage of approximatey 1,000 feet and lot depth of 660 feet, which is presently unimproved; and b. The property to the north and east of the subject site is undeveloped within the Victoria Community Plan Mixed Use category, the property to the south is undeveloped within the Vctona Community Plan Regional Related Office/Commercial category, and thepropertytothewest is developed as a flood control and utility corridor, and c. The application proposes the subdivision of land proposed for a retail shopping center, with a fast food restaurant with a dove-through lane (Conditional Use Pertnd DRC2003-00617), for uses which are permitted within the Victoria Community Plan. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-08 SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP January 14, 2004 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map and proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b. The tentative parcel map and proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The tentative parcel map and proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Through the preparation of an Initial Study, this action has been determined to be within the scope of the supplement to the Vctoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on Juy 7, 1999; and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed projected is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condkion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninsa Divis'wn 1) All pertinent conditions and provisions of DRC2003-00617 shall applyto this approval as specified in Planning Commission Resolution No. 03-184. 2) The Activity Center plaza, as designed, shall be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity for the life of the probed Enaineerina Division 1) All pertinent conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-24 for Parcel Map SUBTT15641, Planning Commission Resolution No. 01- 25 for Tentative Tract 15974, and the Arbors Development Agreement shall apply. 2) The Traffic Impact Analysis fair share traffic mitigation for improvements within the City shall be accomplished through the City's established Transportation Fee Program. The Traffic Impact Analysis fair shah; traffic mitigation for improvements outside the City limits shall be proportionally paid prior to each final map recordation. The fair share amount is $19,812 24. 3) Day Creek Boulevard shall be improved and/or maintained in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Arterial" standards including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, street lights, signing, and stnping. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0408 SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP January 14, 2004 Page 3 4) Foothill Boulevard shall be improved and/or maintained in accordance with the City's "Maior Divided Artenal" standards including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, street Irghts, signing, and striping. 5) The proposed median break on Foothill Boulevard will not be permitted. 6) The driveways shall be designed in accordance v~nth the City's d shall accommodate emergency vehicles as well l " " an icy Driveway Po as truck/treder turning movements. ~ The design at the intersection of the extension of victoria Gardens Lane and Day Creek Boulevard at the traffic signal locations shall be a street type entrance with curb returns. The public nght-of--way will terminate westerly of the East Curb Return (ECR). 8) A reciprocal ioint use access and maintenance agreement shall be required vwth the property to the north. 9) The traffic signal equipment shall be protected, modified, and relocated as required A traffic signal easement shall be required. Concrete pavers may be constructed within the loop detection area. All work shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Gty Engineer. 10) No pavers will be permitted within the public street right-of--way at any dnveway entrance. 11) Prowde a catch basin upstream from the main dnveway entrance at Day Creek Boulevard to eliminate cross gutters. 12) Access other than at traffic signal locations shall be per City Standard No. 101 Type "C." 13) A Water Quality Management Plan (1NQMP) is required and shall meet the approval of the Crty Engineer pnor to Grading Pernik approval. 14) Street trees shall be planted per the City's Street Tree Requirement and Policy. 15) A storm drain manhole shall be regwred at the pnvate/public connection to the sattsfaction of the City Engineer. 16) The bus shelter on Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed outside of the public right-of--way and maintained by the developer/owner 17) Pnor to the issuance of budding pernits, a Drversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Forth CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division F`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-OS SUBTPM16365 -REGENCY REALTY GROUP January 14, 2004 Page 4 when the first building permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demoldion project. 18) The Developer shall offer all newly constructed electrical distnbution facilities for dedication to the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Utility and requinng all such developments to be served electrical service by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. Environmental Mitioation Measures: General 1) The project shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures as contained in the vdoria Arbors Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Cleannghouse No. 98041137) that was certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999 and the Mitigated Negative Dedaretion adopted by the Planning Commission on December 10, 2003 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS• NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: ~v ~J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM16365 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: REGENCY REALTY GROUP INC. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARDS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, rts _J~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftemative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, rts agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at rts sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conddion. 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 03-184 for Conddional ~J_ Use Permit DRC2003-00617, Standard Conditions, and all envvonmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information onty to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Archdect. B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expos, unless extended by the Planning ~~ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Condtions ~~ Cdy Planner. of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the g ~ SC-10.03 1 1 Project No SUBTPM16385 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and ~_ /~ State Fue Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prtor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bwiding and Safety Dnnston to show compliance. The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _J~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwtding permts. 5 All sde, grading, landscape, urtgation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~ consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved yse has commenced, whichever comes first. 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-sde lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permts. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermtng, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner. For stngle- famdy residential developments, transformers shall be placed to underground vaults. ~ 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified to a clear and concise manner, _J~ including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Crty Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwiding pernds. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter. If a double wall ~~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter. 13. Where cobble rock is used, d shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured ~_/ products. Shopping Centers 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcen ~~ shall be subject to separate DevelopmenUDestgn Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, ~~ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permds. 3. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Cdy ~~~ Planner. a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). ~~- SG70-03 2 ~\O Protect No SUBTPM16365 Completion Date b Separate pedestrian access that does not requue the opening of the main doors and to ~_J- include self-closing pedestrian doors h bins t t t h d J~ . ras a e wo to accommo c. Large enoug d. Roll-up doors. -J-J- e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. ~~ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. -~-~- g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed ~~- to be hidden from view. 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours J~ 5 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and ~~- debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for °no overnight parking° and for "employee parking only.' J_/- 7. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an ~_J- exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m. until 7 a.m and 65 d8 during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or ~_/ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, bulding materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m. and 7 a m. unless othervvise specrfied herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 6. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. ~~ They shall be of brickttde pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All future bulding pads shall be seeded and vngated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be J~ included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submtted for Planning D'nnsion approval poor to the issuance of bulding permts. 10 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza ~~- area fighting fixtures, budding fighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures. 11. All future projects wthin the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent ~~ with the architectural program established. 12 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the buildng faces and shall not extend into ~~- the pedestnanwalkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved bythe City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 13 Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping ~~ carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each workday. E. Bui lding Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or ~~ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in bulding plans. 2. For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~_J- budding colors. SG70-03 9 ~\` Prgect No SUBTPM76365 Completion Date F. G. H. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parkmg spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. W hen a side of any parkmg space abuts ~~ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided ~~_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~J and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commeraal and office facilities with 25 or more ~~_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~~_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall prowde motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multrfamily J~ residential protects of more than 10 unds Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall prowde bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parkmg spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. - 2 Transd improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus ~~_ shelters shall also include an adfoinmg bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping m ~.J the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2. W Rhin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking ~~ stalls. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5.1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 ~~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet m vertical height and of 2:1 or greater ~~ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet m vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted m staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for ~_J- the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas 3G,0.08 a ~\2 Project No SUBTPM16365 Completion Date within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced wthin 30 days from the date of damage 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 7. Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Day Creek Boulevard. B Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Dmsion poor to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permts. J. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques provided, and ff appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance wdh City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Dmsion poor to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 3. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the Cdy to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding periods ~~J ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ J~ J~ ~~- ~-1 ~~_ 5~.,~ 5 F~~ Proleci No SUBTPM16365 Comoletion Dete APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1 Submit flue complete sets of plans including the following: ~~- a. Site/Plot Plan; b Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ilne diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including Isometrics, underground diagrams, water andwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearty identrfied on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. ~-J Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet° signature are requred pnor to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and Clty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ~~- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~ Building and Safety Division. M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction. All plans shall be ~~ marked with the protect file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall complywlth the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or ~~ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~ recordation and prior to Issuance of bulding permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6 30 a m. Monday ~~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Dmsion's public ~~- counter). N. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for properly line clearances ~~ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. SG111-o3 B F\~ Project No SUBTPM18365 Completion Date 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for requred occupancy separations. ~~- 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~~- Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~- 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. ~~- 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed. ~~- O. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, Cdy Grading ~~- . Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to J~- perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submtted at the _/~- time of application for grading plan check. 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding J~ permits. 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ,J~ . existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cml Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access t Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _JJ- street centerline): Vanes total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard. ~~- Varies total feet on Footh(II Boulevard. ~~ 2. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. -1--~ 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or by ~~- . deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or poor to the issuance of bwldmg permits, where no map is involved. 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ' JJ- . s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qud-claimed or delineated on the ~~- final map. 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be ~~- dedicated to the City. SG16-03 ~ ~~~ Project No SUBTPM1fi365 Comole4on Date Q. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Treil Other Day Creek Boulevard X X X X X X Foothill Boulevard X X C X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 2 Improvement Plans and Construchom a. Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pnvate street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Ciry Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan check. 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program 4 Install street trees per CIry street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed ' legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans `J / / / / / / -~ f~ / / / / / / / / / / / / _/_/~ SC~10-03 tt ~ ~~ Project No SUBTPM16365 Completion Date The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size' Qly. Foothill Boulevard At Victona Gardens Washington robusta Mewpn Fan 3 R 25 ft O.C 15ft. min FIII In Day Creek Boulevard Minimum of 5 R Palm Double row or B T H , to first dnveway to the away from street light across or match N,~ sidewalk esbmated heights Non-AcUvily Centers - Rhus lances Afican Sumac 5 ft 20 R O C. 15-gal. Pnmanly in Rightof- Informal Way groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Non-Activity Centers - Piatnaus acenfolla London Plane 8 ft Space per 15-gal On-site Tree on-site plans -30ft OC. suggested Thrs pnmary theme tree for Foothill must be behind the nght~of-way per Caltrans Day Creek Boulevard Street Tree Washington robusta Mewcari Fan 4 R 25 ft O.C. 15 ft min minimum of 5 ft way Palm Staggered or B T.H , from street light rows on or match altemate estimated sides of walk heights Street Tree Pyrus callerena NCN 4 R 25 ft O.C. 15-gal "AnstocraC staggered Mahfied rows on standards altemate sides of walk Informal Back round Gei era arvifolla Australian Willow 5 ft 20 ft O C 1 al *TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees. 1) All sfreet trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient defiaencies may require backfill Boll amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Dlvrsion. 4) SVeet trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only SC-10-03 8 ~` ` Project No SUBTPM16365 Comole4on Date R. S. T. Design Notes. 1) Street trees on new streets are to be selected from the City's approved street tree list Based upon available planting area (typically between back-of-curb and the sidewalk) Established streets should already have designated tree species Contact Cam Amos at 909-477-2740, Extension 4023 for information 2) Street trees are to be shown on street or other public improvement plans signed by the City Engineer, and constructed per the same 3) Street trees shown on Planning Division submittals are conceptual only 4) Interior streets will be regwred to select deciduous trees for east-west streets and evergreen trees for north-south streets from the City's approved street tree list Wind- prone areas may be required to utilize a more decduous palette 5) Indicated spacings and sizes are regwrements for City-maintained trees only Where the tree concept goes beyond areas of influence near public improvements and/or any City maintenance easement, spacngs and sizes will be per the on-site plans approved by the Planning Division. On-site and off-site plans shall be coordinated 6) Street improvement plans shall reflect the legend and notes indicated below In some cases, when details about parkway sizes or utilities are unavailable at the time of conditioning, options are provided for various situations It is the designer's responsibility to ascertain the context of the tree planting, select the appropriate tree option, and omit any erroneous information on the final legend. 7) Street improvement plans shall reflect a line item within the construction legend to state: Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ? (TypuxllySheetl). 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as requred. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/ / approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage faalities shall be installed as requved by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/ property from adjacent areas. 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred. til t / /~ ies as necessary. i 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing u _ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from SC-10-03 ~ 0 ~~ Project No SUBTPM16365 Completion Date ft`J ~_~ the CCW D is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them. U. General Requirements and Approvals Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bwlding permit issuance d no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting to exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures W. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 3. All roof openings giving access to the bwldtng shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed X. Windows Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation to case of fire Y. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. All developments shall submit an 8 %z" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: -~ ~- / / / / /_ / / / / / / / / / / / / f \planning\final\pingcomm\subtpm16365 stdcond 1-14 dac SC-10-03 ~~ ~`~ • T H E C I T Y O F RANCUO CUCAMONGA StaffRepol-t DATE: January 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 6.55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Dlstnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN. 0227-171-06. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES -The development of 23 single-famlly lots on 6.55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN: 0227-171-06. Related File. Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to allow up to a 10 7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary and 8-foot high combination wall between Lot 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet, for the development of 23 single-family lots on 6.55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road - APN 0227-171-06. Related Flle Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 5 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zornng• North - Vacant Land, Etiwanda Specific Plan, units per acre) South - The Gardens Banquet Facility, Victoria East - Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan, units per acre) West - Vacant Land, Etiwanda Specific Plan, units per acre) ITEMS "G,H,I" Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling Planned Community, Mixed-Use Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16445, DRC2002-00682, AND DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 2 C. General Plan Desionations• Protect Site - Mixed-Use North - Mixed-Use South - Mixed-Use East - Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Mixed-Use D Site Characteristics• The 6.55 acre site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway. The site slopes southerly at approximately 2 percent and has previously been disked for weed abatement. The site is vacant with existing remnant Eucalyptus windrows. The site is bordered on the east by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (Tract 16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891), a local historic landmark; on the north and west by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (Tract16301 -Centex Homes); and on the south by "The Gardens" banquet faality. ANALYSIS: A General• The project consists of 23 single-family lots located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area The protect is a subdivision only, with no home product proposed at this time. The lots proposed range from 7,632 to 21,040 square feet m size. The average lot size is 10,000 square feet The overall tract lot sizes and pattern are consistent with the proposed Centex Homes subdivision (Tract 16301) to the north and existing John Laing Homes subdivisions (Trects 15947 and 15948) at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road. The proposed subdivision is designed with lots that face north and south along one east-west street, with the exception of the two large lots at the east end of the site, which are requred to face Etiwanda Avenue. The protect is designed to primarily gain access from Etiwanda Avenue, but can also be accessed from the future Victoria Park Lane to the west, through Tract 16301. The applicant has provided a Master Plan concept of Tract 16301 owned by the Centex Homes, which is currently being processed through the City. The Centex tract includes 47 single-family lots that will be accessed from Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. The applicant has gained the necessary agreements from Centex Homes and °Victoria Arbors° for access to Victoria Park Lane. B. Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682• The protect is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, which regwres a conditional use permit to ensure that development along Etiwanda Avenue is consistent with the historical character and quality of the street There are speaal development criteria in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District that regwre homes along the Avenue to face the street, maintain a minimum separation of 25 feet between structures, and provide speaal streetscape design. To meet the overlay requirements, the two lots fronting Etiwanda Avenue are 16,303 (Lot 13) and 21,040 (Lot 12) square feet, which is considerably larger than the typical Low-Medwm lots in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area Future development of these lots with home product will require them to take access from the rear or side of the lots, with no direct access allowed from Etiwanda Avenue The applicant has submitted an exhibit for future development of the lots (Exhibit °F") Special enhanced design will also be required for the fencing material used along Etiwanda Avenue. The fencng material will be required to be similar in design and quality to the material proposed along Etiwanda Avenue for the • • f,~ ~ ~~,T. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16445, DRC2002-00682, AND DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 3 Centex Homes tract to the north, and used along Etiwanda Avenue for the John Laing Homes tract at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road C. Variance DRC2003-01012: The applicant has submitted a Variance application for the expansion of the wall heights to allow up to a 10.7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary (Lots 1-12), and an 8-foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet. As proposed, the design includes a retaining wall of up to 4.7 feet with a 6-foot freestanding perimeter wall constructed on top for the lots along the south property boundary, for a total combined height of 10.7 feet. The wall between Lots 10 and 11 will have up to a 2.5-foot retaining wall with a 6-foot freestanding wall on top, for a total combined height of 8.5 feet. However, for calculating total combination wall heights in the City, the wall is measured up from the middle of the retaining wall, giwng the wall along the south property boundary a maximum measured height of 8.35 feet, and the wall between Lots 10 and 11 a maximum height of 7.25 feet. In the residential zone, a wall height can be extended above 8 feet through approval of a Variance, so long as compatibility with surrounding uses is maintained The Variance is necessary to increase wall heights to eliminate the need to construct 2 1 slopes that would create a °no man's land° at the rear of Lots 1-12, which would lead to maintenance problems and would allow visibility into the rear yards from properties to the south The applicant has been in negotiation with the adiacent property owner of The Gardens banquet facility to create a terrace wall design that would eliminate the need for a Variance; however, that owner declined the design because it would regwre improvements on the banquet faality's property Staff believes that to create a logical design of the rear of Lots 1-12, a Variance to extend both wall heights is warranted for this protect. D. Design Review Committee: On December 2, 2003, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval, subiect to staff's comments with the exception that the perimeter wall on the south side property did not regwre river rock pilasters in its design. The applicant suggested the wall be made of a slumpstone material to match the wall on the south side of The Gardens banquet facility, and the Committee agreed (Exhibit "G"). E. Technical and Gradino Review Committees The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subiect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. F Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365• Existing Eucalyptus windrows occur on-site, which the applicant proposes to remove An arbonst report (Steve F. Andersen, Arbonst Services, August 12, 2003), that shows all of the trees, with the exception of one Eucalyptus tree, are in an average or dead condition, with most having structural problems, and Borer beetle infestation The report recommends that the trees be removed for health and safety reasons To mitigate the removal of trees, a Condition of Approval will require that all Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards G Neighborhood Meeting On November 24, 2003, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the protect. Other than one representative from The Gardens banquet faality, no G,~,~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16445, DRC2002-00682, AND DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 one attended the meeting. The banquet faality's representative was in favor of the protect H. Environmental Assessment: The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II. It was determined the protect could have a sigmficant adverse environmental impact on the following: 1. Short-term air quality dunng site grading; 2. Cultural resources if any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading; 3. Biological in terms of tree removal, and 4 Drainage and noise dunng construction The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impact to less than significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi6445, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, Variance DRC2003-01012, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, rad fa City tanner BB.W ~m Attachments' Exhibit "A° - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B° - Site Map Exhibit °C" - Conceptual Grading Plan with Sections Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445 Exhibit "E" - Varance Exhibit Exhibit "F" - Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 Typical Exhibit Home Plotting Exhibit "G" - Design Review Committee Comments, dated December 2, Exhibit "H" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2003-01012 with 2003 ~,`~,_`~ u ~~o z °a ~~N ~~1= ~~~ H ~ ~ oI .~ ~6 ~ O C`O ~ ~~ e ~~ 4 r ~~~ ~o~~ ~" Q~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~ ~ e `` ~j~~~ ~~ ~ .9 E ~~ ~~ ~~ • ~ ~ O III i00j; ~III11.111111111111~'Il ~:... ... y ~~ t~ sy ~~ ~~~~ 0 Z U ~Q w U z O U ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ I ~~~ Is T ~- .~ -~, ~ ~ ~~ e g 4 I 0 p t e 4 a p~ f 6 ~~~ ~Z 0 Z~~~~~ ~ ''~ 0 ~J 1 0 ~~~ U ~,~~< U ~ ~ Z ~ ° ~ ~ a s 9 1 r /~ ss m ~Z~ 1 N(nBIBLI ~ ..._ ~ Z~ Q 9 - ~~lF~ ~~ U ~s "~ U ~ ~ Z ~ rL ~~ '~ c`vQ~B6991 ^ ! ° ', ... b rti ~ ,~ ~o~~~~~ ~~ :It~ I'll 9lssES~S°~ i F- / \ ~ ° alb !III ,mml 11 ~ 1 V ~ U ,r L ~~ ~! ` 6 j: E 1@ IIt (~ uiu~l~ll( Ihtla !!;! ! `,~!ii j tilt t IiL'tttl ~! ~~ _~~- .,. ~ i G,H,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ o~s~~l l l~„ ~~~~~~1 •~ I~Il~sii EEnE IIIII:ttt q S: I e ~~~ ~ ~j`~~ III;~ ~' ~• i" ~ -_ CJ I I I I I I I~ b I I I I i t, ~ \\ l~ 35 ~, ' f,~ ---- ;i~ .\ `__ i_ i ~_ '20 ~~.I ~ ]s ~ 1 iii ~ []"II - -- ~~~~~] ~ '"~~~ ~' ~ ; .~~ 4 _ "_ _ _ l imp ~~ , ~'~~ :_ i I I -o-- \ 2 - ~ , 27 . Icy l~ . ~ '~ _E' _~ ;3 ,~• ~ ~~ -~ o ~ '~ ~`' _ - _ ~r ~ irk ~~~~^ ; s ~ '~ , 5 a~ g 24 T - - E - ~- ~ ' ~ '~I - - ~ 0 J 1~, l'F, ~ -~ LE FAMILY , ~~~ , --- : ~ ~~ may. ~y1p lAL9 -~B , ~NIHEK~ o, s Lek ,, ; -, - ~I®1 ~';~ ~ ~~~~; ~'' ` - ~ - - - ~ r s ' ~' a-p -~7f~Q~l '4a ( g aS i6 - ' 29, ; II ~ ~ , ~ - '1' 4i RMi ~ - ~ 4 -_ 'I elj -~ ,.r ru o ~ ~ , I I-$~JTII - - ~ y o u o '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~I r1 b ~ ~ 7 I ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~{ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 - ~I .i ~ i ~ ~ zs 3T .A ~ ~~ \ 3 ' ~ _ ~ 7 ~ ~ ----~_ ~ i i ~~~ ~n ~~ ~ ~~ sa' EXCEED B, ~' ~ ~ ~( ~` '; N HEK~iT - b `= 1 I 2 z ~ ~ ~ e . ~ ~ ~~i - - - _- - _- -- -= -- ~ --_ - --=-=-_ -= ~- ---__-_-_~~--- =-i- - _--------------_-_ --~`~ _ _ _ Ef11MA1mA_ - _ AVEMIE - - ~ - -- ~ ~ - ' ~ - - . _x - .- -- - -- - - ~ -- - - - > ron ~~>~>•~6 Neyon Bwch Colhanio 97660 TEl (9~9) 8333600 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16445 ~,~ ~,, RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-23 ~ ~~~. NORTH RETAINING WALL _w~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~"~~~~~ ~ ,z ~~ VARIANCE EXHIBIT S~ i"=140' DATE PREPARES OCTOBER 13, 2003 CRY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONOA COlN1Y OF 3AN B~NARDRKI SfAIE OF CALFOfi1A ,4j i / ,~ !! ,i` i ~ ,r ,11 .i ~~I. ,'I ~~~ .r ^' .; 97' l- r' ~ ~ BSL~~~ ~~. N M a ~- - ~ c :~ i t- flRIVEWA~' ,., - 'ACCESS ~ 11 ~ I (~ I L' ~ `i- l~~ 1 - ~_~_~-~ ~ ~-- I o ~-, ,- ;" .2 '~ `" . -, .: I I G~'~ i~e~ ~ .._. _--- ~' PF~AIi® FOR ~~ ,- ~In18II1 I.jRIII ~IdIIle3~ •' ~I`/ ~fj~ _R'.;•~ i /~ ~ I ~ ~~+~~~~ 110' ,~~a: -YARD FENCi~-` - 200' ETIWANDA"'AVENUE OVERLAY,'bISTRICT. '- ~' ' ; ~ 142' 4 1 ~ Iwl `` I 1 ~ ~I~ I ~ '~ ~~ ~~~ r ~, ~h . ~ ;1~4,,~i~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~~ SCA ,. r i '~I I ~~ i I L. i ~ III I ~+ I, ~- _, `, i ~~ _t i I ,i o u~! ,~ d ` I ~ \ \ ` ~ II ~ ~. ~9, I, ~ ~ r,4 ~ ~, i , ~ I~ _I ~~_ ~~ ~' i -1- i, ~~, I I i ~.'' "I ~ ! , ~ !li ``, I I ,, I ;i ;I i ~ I~ f '~a ~ "~~ 1 I ~ NousE F~oTTNCS ARE TYPICAL ~I " I ~ ONLY. FWAL ARCI~iECTUF;E;TO _- -7 ~_ ~9E'BUBAfi®AT A LATBi DATE ~~~_---- _ ~ ---~~_ ----1------, ~ i _ ; ; , ~, -~--~_~~~~ ~~-~ - -'rte ~~--TENTATIVE TRACT No.164~ PI~AI~ 9Y. ;;', RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-23 .. wn_ ~~~c~ EXHIBITS '"' l ~ ~ `~ `Z DATE REVISES OCTOBER 22, 2003 DATE PREPAFIE~ JUNE 10, 2003 crrv nc neucir~ diceucwne txv urv nc aeu p~7ueanu~ c'e,c nc nei w... DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.00 p.m. Warren Morelion December 2, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16445- WILLIAM LYON HOMES-A residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN• 0227-171-06. Related Files. Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, Variance DRC2003-01012, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES -The development of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Lme Road -APN 0227-171-06. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16301, Variance DRC2003-01012, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to allow up to a 10.7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary and an 8-foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet, for the development of 23 single-family lots on 6.55 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN• 0227-171-06 Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16301, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. Design Parameters• The protect consists of 23 single-family lots located in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan area. The protect is a subdvision only, with no home production proposed at this time. The lots proposed range from 7,632 to 21,040 square feet in size The average lot size is 10,000 square feet The ESP requres minimum 7,200 and average 10,000 square foot lots. The two lots fronting Etiwanda Avenue are 16,303 (Lot 13) and 21,040 (Lot 12) square feet, which is considerably largerthan the typical Low-Medium lots in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The overall tract lot sizes and pattern are consistent with the existing Centex homes subdivision (Tract 16301) to the north and John Laing Homes subdiwsions (Tract 15947 and 15948) at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road. The protect is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, which requires a Conditional Use Permit to ensure that development along Etiwanda Avenue is consistent with the historical character and quality of the street. There are special development criteria in the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District that require homes along Etiwanda Avenue to face the street, maintain a minimum separation of 25 feet between structures, and provide specal streetscape design The applicant has designed the two lots along Etiwanda Avenue large enough to meet the overlay regwrements. Future development of these lots with home product wtll require them to take access from the rear or side of the lots, with no direct access allowed from Etiwanda Avenue Special enhanced design will also be requred for the Penang material used along Etiwanda Avenue. The fenang material will be required to be similar in design and quality as the material used along Etiwanda Avenue for the tracts to the north Attached is a typical site plan exhibit for the two lots fronting Etiwanda. The applicant has submitted a Variance application for the expansion of wall height to allow up to a 10 7- foot high combination retaimng/freestanding wall along the south property boundary and an 8-foot high combination/freestanding wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet The Variance is necessary to increase the perimeter wall height and eliminate the need to construct 2.1 slopes that would create a "no mans land" that would lead to ` maintenance problems and would allow visibility into the rear yards from properties to the south ~~ DRC COMMENTS TT16445, DRC2003-00682, AND DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES December 2, 2003 Page 2 A tree removal permit has also been submitted requesting the removal of a remnant Eucalyptus windrow that runs along the north boundary of the site. The windrow includes 21 Eucalyptus trees, two Ligustrum trees, one Citrus tree, and one Walnut tree An arborist report has been prepared that shows all of the trees, with the exception of one Eucalyptus tree, are in a poor or dead condition. The report recommends that the trees be removed for safety reasons. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: None -The applicant has worked with staff to resolve all mator issues. Secondary Issues• Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and trine permitting, the Committee wll discuss the following secondary design issues: To further enhance community character and flavor, the perimeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue should be designed to be open with combination of real aver rock and wrought iron fencing. All river rock pilasters should be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size to match the residential developments to the north. 2 Enhanced landscaping should be provided forthe lots with street frontage along Ettwanda Avenue to further enhance the character of the community 3. The perimeter wall on the south side of the protect should be made of a decorative material that is consistent in design with Tentative Tract 16301 to the west. The wall should include real aver rock plasters a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size 4. The retaining wall at the southeast corner of the protect site (Lot 12) shall be limited to a maximum of 3 feet in height in the front setback along Etiwanda Avenue The wall should include real aver rock plasters a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size 5. The retaining wall between Lots 10 and 11 should be made of a decorative material where it wll be visible to the public. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval subtect to the above-mentioned comments. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Pam Steward, Cristine McPhal, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Warren Morelion The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subtect to the above-mentioned comments with the following revision to Secondary Issue #3. • Use slump stone with decorative cap and no plaster for the perimeter wall on the south side of the protect ~,1~ t~ \~ • t' _ - CRy of Rancho Cucamonga P/ann~ng DiNSion (e09j X77-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (P/ease type or pant clearly using ink. Use the taA key to move Irom one line to the next Ime ) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed - project so that the City may`~evievr the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and .- Guidelines; the- California _Environmental",'Quality~~Act;>and,;the~.City's :Rules=,and ^ Procedures to Implement CEQA:.It is important that the information requested in this` application lie"provided mfull ~~ ~ °''=~~` ~= -~ _ - - ~ '` - "~'~-<=~''`. ~.~`-' -` _ - - - INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWILLNOTBEPROCESSED Please notethatdistheresponsibilityoltheapplicanttoensurethat the application is complete at the bins o/ submittal, City staf/ will not be available to peAorm work 2qulred to provide missing mlormahgn Application Number for the protect to which this (orm pertains Tentative Tract 16445 ProlectTrtle Tentative Tract 16445 NameBAddressolproledowner(5J _ William Lyon Homes 4490 Von Karman Avenve Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name 8 Address oI developerorprolect sponsor (same as above) ContacfPersonBAddress Mark Thomas (William Lyon Homes) (same as above) Name & Address of person prepanng this form (I(d~Herent lrom above) Stanley C. Morse ~` MDS Consulting 17320 Redhill Avenue, Suite 350 Irvine, CA 9261(r4` U Telephone Number (9441 7 51 -RR 91 ~ 1 4 " ~ ~ ~~ PROJECT INFORMATION d DESCRIPTION: Inlormabon indicated by an asterisk (•) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless othenwse requested bys~a~/ '1) Provide a lull scale (73.1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ect site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representative wews into the site Irom the noRh, south, east and west, wews into and Irom the sde hom the primary access points that serve the site, and representative wews o/ significant /eatures /rom the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) ProleclLocat~on(descnbe) 7576 Et>.wanda Avenue. The project is south of Baseline and north of Church Street. The project Ls adjacent to the northerly yroperty line of "The Gardens" facility 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (atach add~bonal sheet i/necessary). '5) Gross Site Area (adsq K) 6.55 'SJ Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 5.23 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would eKect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet it necessary) None. 8) Include a description of al/ permits which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect Tree removal and trading. 9) Describe the physical setting o/the site as if exists belore the protect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant lectures described In adddion, cite all sources of inlonnation (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) The site slopes from the northerly property line to the southeast and southwest corners. A small north to south ridge bisects the site in half with natural ilia, naon rn rhP Tact and we t The ex>,stine h>,eh point elevation clop the northerly property line >,s 1283 and falls to elevation 1270.8 >_n the southeast EnwronmenWllnlaForml doc Page 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~-~ ~~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM corner and 1271.8 in~e southwest corner. Th>.s >_s ~ange of 12 feet and 11 feet, respectively. The s>.te >_s covered with native grasslands and a few eucal yptus trees. There are no ext.stt.ng structures w>_thin the protect boundary. _ The p rotect will t.mprove Etiwanda Avenue along the p roject frontage to the „ltim ate half w>,dth. All streets within the protect are public and dest.¢ned to a 60-foot City standar d width. 10J Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o(the site Cde all sources of m/ormatron (books, published reports and oral history) None. 11) Describe any notse sources and them levels that now affect the site (arroraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will a(lect proposed uses, Nnna_ 12) Describe the proposed protect m detail Ihrs should provide an adequate description o(the stte m terms o(uftrmate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate i(there are proposed phases /or development, the eMent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment Attach add~t~onal sheet(s) d necessary The 6.55-acre site >.s proposed to be developed with 23 single-fam>,ly detached residential lots with a m>,n>.mum lot size of 7200 SF and a gross density of 3.51 DU/AC. The pr>,mary access >,s from Et>wanda Avenue and future access would be through Tentative Tract 16301 with egress to Victoria Park Lane. The protect is bordered by Etiwanda Avenue to the east, The Gardens facility to the south. proposed s>.n¢le-family residential to the west and north (Tentative Tract 16301). thin the EnvugnmenlallnloFOrm1 tlac Page3 ~ `~~ ct boundary. Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM All axis Avenue right-of-way improvements will be removed. The project may be developed in multiple phases Phasing will be determined during final approvals. 13) Descnbe the surrounding properires, rncludrng rnformatron on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenrc aspects Indicate the type o/land use (residential, commemral, etc), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, n;ar yard, etc ) East: Etiwanda Avenue, vacant and a single-family residence South- The Gardena facility West Proposed sin>zle-family residences (TT 16301) North: Proposed single-family residences (TT 16301) 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the prolect7 ^^ The oroiect will convert the existinK native vegetation into 23 single-family residences. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term norse to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How wdl these norse levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproo(ng are proposed? Short-term noise will be generated by construction activity during the development of the tract. Long-term noise will be vehicular traffic leaving / entering the site. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenrc trees' See arborist report. 17) Indicate any bodes o! water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None. G~~~~~~ FnvvnnmentallnfnFnrml dnr Paoe 4 Created on 5l22/20C~ 4 09 PM • 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For lurther clanficahon, please ' contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnd at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gaUday) 13.800 Peak use (gal/Day) 27 , 600 b CommeroraUlnd (gal/day/ac) -- Peak use (gaUmm/ac) -- 19) Indreate proposed method o(sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank [~ Sewer ll septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests I1 discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For /urther clanricatron, please contact the Cucamonga County Wafer Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gaUday) 6 , 210 b CommertraUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number ofresrdential units 23 Detached (md~cate range of parcel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze The prod ect proposes constructing 23 lots. The minimum lot size is 7,600 SF, a maximum lot size is 21,600 SF and an average lot size of 10,000 SF Attached (indicate whether units are rental or /or sale units) 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ N/A to Rent (per month) $ N/A to $ 22) Specrly number of bedrooms by unit type N/A 23) Indreate anticipated household srze by unit type N/A ~~ EnvironmentallnfoFOnn1 doc Page 5 Created on 5!22!2002 4 09 PM 24J Indicate the expected number of sclioo/children who will be residing wdhin the pm~ect Contact the appropriate Schoo/ Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary b Junior Hrgh 16 c SeniorH~gh 4 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and maforluncbon(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses 26) Total Noor area ofcommercial, industrial, or instrtuhonal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28J Numberofemployees Total Maximum Shift Time of Mazimum Shift 29) Provide breakdown o/antrcrpatedlob classifications, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classrtlcation (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Cdy '31) For commercra/and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be ven(ed through the South Coast AirOualrty Management District, at (818) 572-6283) ~ N . Z. 20 EnvironmentallnfoForml doc Pageo Created on 5!22!2002 4 09 PM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the wafer, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, p/ease indicate their response Yes. Water is available to the site located within Etiwanda Avenue. Sewer will be available through Tentative Tract 16301 and facilities located within Victoria Park Lane Storm water runoff within the protect will be collected and conveyed through proposed catch basins and storm drain lines connecting to proposed facilities within Victoria Park Lane through Tentative Tract 16301. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, rdd~oacbve substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Bammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o/any o/the above Please list the malenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known No 34J ill the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic malenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory o(all such malenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No. t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation or this pro/ect to the best ofmyabit~ty, that the (acts, statements, andrn/ormation presented are true and conect tot he best oI my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional i /ormation may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date c_ 2j'~~ Signature ~/~~ Title ~~~'t~/ ~~.~ EnwronmentallnfoFOrm1 tloc Page 7 Created on 5 2212002 4 09 PM II T=~~ -~ ~yQ ~~ . /x/600 /~ ~ Summi[~ •~ ~~ i I _~~ _ .I ; t~F~ E P / I _ __ ~S MIT ~ ~1 ~ I ~_';a \ i __ --'le____}_=Yi°-° 153a ® 28 1505 / I 7 I '~,, n~atilve .~r-met-1~~ i • I:. /__ ~ ~;'~ I. II II , ~;•=~ ~ II II II • .I -; ~~ ~ ~~ ast~ II ;, ;~ ~ • ; ~ • -• - ~ ' - II .I II II II W ® ~ I `_ I j ~" ~ ad--- rap II ~ -_-- II ;~ u9e U I I AVENUE ~ IL " a ' _~11 II -~I Gagreg e: ,-,-, s_• Tara '" /. _ I ~J` .y+.,w fir, I ~ Hk ;'~ 5. rv 3 ~ _.. ~ 1401••...• I ~~Iw~ ___F ,• .el •s r Station ~r it ~/ = '.`~;'t~a T' I ~L; ° "~> E~~: 33 •w I II '~ ~ ~ 9" 1359 E 1 • •: a II i (~ I _ II ; ~ • I I •~A- ~g a ., - o ( K • =v- .I ; i Etiwanda is ` ` II_t J~'-F~I r I ~ ,~ ~,v _. 3r7gooo m ry i _-- _-' _ _'__ -- - - '- -sr~urau° - - I • = ~'` ~ A ~l7{/TN~RN - PAE/FI ---~"-- 3 ~- -~ I~ .J'~ _ - / ~ II '1- - A t/~I \ _ II ~ \~• q ~' ~~ n ' 1 aT ~ m o II J -~I / I J~ I - ~'' `~ 5 li d ~' ° ~° 3 ~?h~,no MLLE ~.,.r, i -~' /~•,, \' O;~ITANA- ~~ ~. T~tat~Y - ~~c 44'5 y1 =z ~- ~ / ' % ¢m II;------Jv ~-i~~~ II ~ oQ zoi ~~- -` Foor i :.: ~ er_vo %r~ I CORP "O° ° ~ \ "" .. LI -~r.~ ; - • iJJ I • /~1^_~-'' ~Y.r`~~~~/ \ ••~`3 • r~ b -xl i • ~\ 220000 A . ~7 II ~ r ~ ~ • 7 ~b Wat _Td'IT s --~~ ~~ r~~ i ~ ` / •• ~~~ ~ Tan .Park '.~ ` • FEET (5) ~~ x ~, Q ~~~; _ ..... •99--~ '-~ Mt ARROW ROUTE -~~'• ••~`• • c - •.n I •o• i 3773 ll a ~ ~e~ II50 ~~1 ~ ~1 •• . o O /i50 Wi _ _ ii i ~~.. 1.. ~. •• •. ~ ~• _- _•• • Ettwand6 ~ '~ • i _ __ _I ~ r- I .,,a- ~-~ ++a---CSvaa~i' d _ ` 'S~. 'aa~~'~o~~~~Y'3i$~"rC ran;' ¢,~L• \ 1 ,':.` 1 eoal<n ~vw.une ~ -~ `1 `Water Tank ~I~T'ry~~~'!.~.^~:rS.'~!~•~' <. O / 4A6gTS~ IJI~'~nait - a Q r FEE(D~ER „ ~~- _ __ _ _ _ rt_ Ins 'IAelNetas ru •,raroe ___ '1 fi.'„)``],~~ ~~''~-r i;~ .~ r °° n72 _ l.,_~, _~at-~-~-li#~~7~i sue' __ " V i !/ ~ ~ ,n~i i f~l )_f--- ~~ _ ;,I ~r .^c-- Yf i~l~i(-~i ~; I 4 ~1_E1 ~1 ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ .,~ ~ i fz . 1 F ~ ,- " ^= Is' E tf F ~ I t ~ ,~' '? ' ~' Ill - ~= ' e i ~ ~ _ -3 ' ~ , i-. :~ , ~ , ~ ~,~,` - ~ '__, , , o ~ ~_ ` -`~' _ ` "I Z~~~/ `~~~a;~._~' S1 ~ ~ ~'~' -r=te-- -~ ~~' ;~ ,k - ~~id-1~ w~ ., a - .F; ~ ~ ~ i - y II~, ^ ~~ ,Ir ~ -j' ~ ~ ~I - -~-- -~-~ _ SUI'\` -ems` } 1 ~I ~ I "~glh a .~ J1~ 'j ~, / r y~~l -_~ v - ~6 l+ asl •1 ~' ~ I' ~=1yc S i j ~ ~~~11~ T, i _ - ~!~~ESri~,E!E1tiFsi(~~' ';I~ '_' _~ ,'L~°- r, ';_ ~~ ~~ ;fir - PREPAReD Sri ~ .,.. RB'AF~ f'~ ~~ ~Ie~ w>>~>~>,>~. NOFlH s°~ '~=,5°' TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16445 G i~TZ23 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-23 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP DATE PREPARE MARCH 1, 2003 CRY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN . STATE OF CALFOFNA y r~ ~ S ~ } ~ ' ` ~ry Yr ' xrrw .r C Y~ f tt~ Y '. ~Y~~O~~ ~ t r ' ."1_r 2~£ si ~..1 y.l ~ ~ ~^4 .~, i~ 'r t:1 i~.`.k _ tr ` F- t r 3 „ f . ~ : ' ` ' ~ ' ~~ v ~r r;ry ,,;~,~, .r rv.e ,'y,,,_ -. r ',.^ tn`~-r v' ~ : ~v rvr~•' , ~ lJS'~ rv _ -.`Fl k M1-. :^r-.f ~' ~~~Y M1~~a 4~. ~1i1 t1 We.s ~, rv.~. ~ " ' r- f X12 ~'5 V ' ~ ` .~ r { x 4 r . 1 i ~r~ 6 .. rry ~~ Y T a alp x i `Y'y} K ~ t ' ~~~5r»tl~Nrt`{~5• . Y~Y _ _ ~?y . ~! r '~ > 4 . . ., N ( ~ ` ~ .' ~ r .£r lv ~ . Sr ~ Y.r r < _ ~ ~ Y- -' r.~cA JN 'Ji: itr ~ a• ~ Y' ^' 5 `r v °fi: r r r ~ ., ~,rc •r ~ Tl ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~z 'rQ ~ r y ..!y- .r - '2 ' P~Ai~ BM .r. oYW~ • .r.• ~~ 1. w~t~,r>~ TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16 RESIDENTIAL LOTS G,~,~2~ PHOTOGRAPH No.1 DATE PFlB'AREQ MARCH t, 2003 CRY OF RANCFp GICAIAONOA COUNfY OF BAN BEiirUltU~iOr STATE OF CALFO(f7A P~BAF®B1Y~ PF~AJ~ FOR -_ ~,~ TENTAl1VE TRACT No. 16445 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-23 G. a,z 25 PHOTOGRAPH No. 4 DATE PREPAREQ MARCH 12003 CRY aF RANCFIO CUCANCNOq CCUNfY OF SAN BERiARDNO, SPATE OF CALFOFNA _ a ...Sr _.Y ^ f YaI~ *~'. / '+w ~5s+.^•_~ jGS~yi, }4„ .L?} c ~ •". _ ~ ~ ~~ r1fs"`J ~` "f., ,. .S-r~S ?-~„Xd3 ~•: ~~~, s .+.. {(•a1 s {~-~a "b~^r $.~~;n .,{?~„~~.°.• c~. ~~~ ~~t ~ , ,.. _ ~ t. .i ' r{ 4.~~ ~: a p:, .e ;'a t. ,•;.o~.Pt lrfi~-j: ~, ,'• Js~Y-ri •aA j. r ••], ;ti tw'.r- ,.,.,. ..r ,~ >'y' ~ 1` `~ .~ .-tl';.,.c p•' frt'r °M",.~s'' n~'~~ j n t `y~3 '-~r'k , rY.' :W nv~.~ U~o<<L..j ',. `•n. ~~•a" •.+ f - , t' .~ ra;' 3:a~e ~, >...• ~~ .. „lc, ,~'~ •,Zy.`r cGsy_ i e~..~C"PL 5.~,~ ~ "^~' ~ .• `V' ".: •i~u `.:,;`,:~. - •rt i ~~, ~; `~.v . : : NA'.•~.~~•,~~rt+C~9yciirs'[s 4~'i,. ~•'r s 1 ` ~. a a. 3+~`~. ..'~sYf s r ~` r ` ~ . - i '< ~ ~ F tx ~ -~ v.Y. ~ ~q a a' q. - 1,"-s" '024;•' r ~~'M "rwt•t, ;~•i5'a'r: F ' sm ,~~•'r~~7.„': "~i"N Si*~i'"a .5~r°_~~nh +, q2 ya~4. tl.r ~w,`w 3 bx..s ,..w rrn .~" s .. n• ~ ~ rvyi,L'-' ,. s: d ~rcK rz~~; ,.,~i. r~.^ti-se a.• ~5a'w`:" ~au~,i. ~T~s*--a~~.«r.<r: ~%~ ~. ' d` ,d n `w. n nr by,.c < ~- ` 4"q a~>~ - • YT: r. q Y. ~ s ~ `.r .• ~ ~ a; ~ ' } ~ i ~ ~ t 4 .~ .w s~•r~4p Y,"ry"~"'i~ ~.'-ats~~~ PR•~AF~ Bri "~~~0" TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16 ~~ RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-23 i`,,,,.~ ~,, ~,T-2e PHOTOGRAPH No. 6 ~+ DATE PF~ARED: MARCH t 2003 CITY OF R4NCFI0 CUCMION~4 CCURY aF 8AN BB~lAtO!!D, BTAIE OF CAlFOAiA t~AR®en ~~ ~ /`~ ~,~. TENTATNE TRACT No. 16445 RESIDENTIAL LOTS t-23 G, N ,~.2`~ PHOTOGRAPH No. 8 DATE PREPARED: MARCH L 2003 CITY OF RANCFID CUCAMON~4 CO~MY OF 3AT1 Bt3~1/J~WJ, STAIE OF CN.FOHiA City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract SUBTT16445, Conditional Use Pennd DRC2003-00682, and Variance DRC2003-01012 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permd DRC2003-00365 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT 16445 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwellmg units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Lme Road -APN 0227-171-06 Related Files. Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, Vanance DRC2003-01012, Minor Exception DRC2003- 01012, Tree Removal Permd DRC2003-00365. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES -The development of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN. 0227-171-06 Related Files Tentative Tract SUBTT16301, Variance DRC2003-01012, Mrnor Exception DRC2003-01012, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to allow up to a 10 7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary and 8-foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 6 feet, for the development of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road -APN 0227-171-06. Related Fdes Tentatnre Tract SUBTT16301, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Wtlliam Lyon Homes 4490 Von Karman Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Etiwanda Specific Plan, Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 6 55 acre site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway The site slopes southerly at approximately 2 percent and has previously been disked for weed abatement The site is primarily vacant with existing remnant Eucalyptus windrows The site is bordered on the east by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (TR16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891) a local historic landmark, on G, ~1tz ~ Initial Study for S U BT T 16445/D R C2003-00682 the north and west by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (TR16301 - Centex Homes), and on the south by °The Gardens° banquet faality 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval Is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used In this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a °Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or °Less Than Significant Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the following pages City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 (/) gesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Matenals ()Mineral Resources (/) public Services () Utilities/Service Systems (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Sods ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportationlfraffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed prolect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Rev 7/22/03 ~ 1 y' 1 ~ `~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16445/DRC2003-00682 Page 3 () I fmd that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I fmd that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or °Potentially Sigmficant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed m an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NE TIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation r}ieasurv`s that are impo~SecyNpop the pr~osed pro),ect, nothing further is required Prepared By ~ Vie: /~~ ~ '- Q Reviewed By Date ~( ~~ ~~ ~~ Rev 7/22/03 ''' 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~^' f• J Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 ~~, s~cNn~.rn ~, Issues and Supporting Information Sources `s°o'N °:~'; M, ~~ s,w'~"~n~.,,, No ~ i~o t~ ~ ~ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect. a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substant~aily degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a caeca corridor according to General Plan Exhibd III-15. • b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no histonc bwldings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road and is characterized by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (TR16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891) a local histonc landmark to the east, by vacant land that is also proposed for single-faintly development (TR16301 -Centex Homes) to the north and west, and by "The Gardens° banquet facility to the south. The easternmost portion of the site occurs within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract The purpose of the overlay district is to protect and enhance the casual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings Special regwrements of the overlay distract include onenting the front of the homes to Etiwanda Avenue, a 25-foot setback from Etiwanda Avenue, and a minimum 25-foot setback between structures While there is no specific architectural style required, proposed styles are requved to reflect traditional styles found along Etiwanda Avenue The site utilization plan shows two lots occurring within the overlay district Actual homes will likely occur a minimum of 50 feet from Etiwanda Avenue The proposed prolect will meet regwrements of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, and will blend with existing surrounding development Design review is requred prior to approval City standards will also require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant Rev 7/22/03 ~ t ~ t ~ ~\ Initial Study for SUBTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 ~ ~, a~n~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources gory ~,'Y ~,~ ~, ~,~ ,,, 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Mondoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nom-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,OOOfeet south of Base Line Road and is characterized by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (TR16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891) a local historic landmark to the east, by vacant land that is also proposed for single-family development (TR16301 -Centex Homes) to the north and west, and by "The Gardens' banquet facility to the south There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga there are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road and is characterized by vacant land that is proposed for single-family development (TR16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891) a local historic landmark to the east, by vacant land that is also proposed for single-family development (TR16301 -Centex Homes) to the north and west, and by "The Gardens" banquet facility to the south The nearest agricultural use is a landscape nursery, Inland Nursery at 13194 Base Line Road, approximately 5 miles northeast of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 7/22/03 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ /~ Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 ~ m.~ so~ifi~am I... Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Po1B1hB"Y Siprvficerlt '""" MNpatlon """ Sprvfirant No I act IeMO teG I ecl I ect 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air qualrty violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the tollowing mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected Rev 7/22/03 G,~,z ~ Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Leis Than SlOryficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources. 5p~~,fi"~ M, ~';~, sow No i em ~~~o gee i ~, i equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt Is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, Rev 7/22/03 (" t ~ I ~ ~3-,~ • i Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~,~~ SipNficeM Lav Issues and Supporting Information Sources o',~t81„Y, Mn ~~ so ~,,, No therefore, would all be cumulatively significant rf they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmf~cant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively sigmficant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Pian FEIR identified the citywide increase m operational emissions as a sigmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels m the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor single-family residences Potential impacts to av quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 7/22/03 " 1 t ~ t -" Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 ~ ~, SIpNfiCBM lW Issues and Supporting Information Sources soN Ali M~I~ «+ s,p ~„ r.,, I ect Inro te0 I I 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S. Fish and W ildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (/) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 7/22/03 `-'i l ~ l r ~ ` Initial Study for SU BTT16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 LeA4 man S,gnficanl Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g a°'aaaa~'Y Signficant vim, MNgeEOn roan Sigrnficam No I an Into tea ~ I e) Existing Eucalyptus windrows occur onsite Development of the site will remove these trees Ordinance Number 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on prorate property, regwres that no person remove or relocate an woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single truck circumference of 15 inches or more and multi-trucks having a circumference of 30 inches or more, without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City In April 2003, the applicant submitted the application for a Tree Removal Permit with appropriate fees An arborist report (Steve F Anderson, Arborist Services) was prepared on August 12, 2003, that shows all of the trees, with the exception of one Eucalyptus tree, are in a poor or dead condition The report recommends that the trees be removed for health and safety reasons The following mitigation measure, as requred in the Tree Ordinance will ensure impacts from the removal of trees are less than signrficant. 1) All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculate (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Pian, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ech a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5 c) Directly or indvectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemetenes~ , Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) Across Etiwanda Avenue stands the Koch House (c 1891) a local historic landmark The proposed protect design includes oversized lots (21,040 square feet and 16,303 square feet) fronting Etiwanda Avenue, Eucalyptus windrow planting within the parkway, and rock cobble curbs, to preserve the character of the street scene There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented Rev 7/22/03 ~ t "1~ `~~ Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 ~~ S~Brufieetrt ~+ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g a«am,•ly SIBNfiC'dllt w"" MiLBatlan m•n SiGefic•trt No I act Into teE I I 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish ks archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. . c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age° and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibd V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (I.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Rev 7/22/03 "I 1 ~ l~ /'~' Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 I .e. men $ipmficant Late Issues and Supporting Information Sources 5,°`~; ~„ 0 M,"r"" 7aDCn me" S,pnlfleem No 1 ecl Inco weta0 I 1 act d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated. L J 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shaking? O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-sde landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 16-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and d is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fault, axording to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hdl Fault, passes within 2 miles northwest of the sde, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 8 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 8 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„. 6 2 earthquakes, is approximately 11 5 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant Rev 7/22/03 C,,N~~ ~ Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D R C 2003-00 682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 ~~~ rvlpYficvn Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources sow °~;,; M,;, na„ s„'N"fi~,,,, „o I an IrKn IaE ~ act ~ b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to Apnl, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting m temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts m the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitroe dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, In accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. s 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the agwfer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand Soil (Tv6) association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibd 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand Sod (TvB) association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3 The Tujunga serves consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils that formed on alluvial fans m granitic alluvium Sods are present at slopes of 0 to 9 percent m elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet Tujunga loamy sand has a profile descriptive of the series. These soils are very rapidly permeable Runoff is very slow and the hazard of water erosion is slight, but the sod will blow if left unprotected The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed Rev 7/22/03 ~ (a (~ to i i Initial Study for SU BTT16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than 9pn~ficam Lem Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pia"'""Y Sipnifieent wan Minpafion TT8" SlpMficaM No I aM Inco rated I ad I act 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area? f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than signdicant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, Rev 7/22/03 G 1 ~ (~, ~1, Initial Study for SU BTT16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 I~ss ma, S,prvficarit Lma Issues and Su ortlnn Information Sources PP fd ameml~lly $ipnificani wpm MiGpatm rr~ $ipnificaM NO I act Inco ated I I ecl and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels well reduce the potential for significant Impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the prolect site. The prolect site is located approximately 28 miles from the nearest existing school (Grapeland Elementary) and directly east from the nearest proposed school (Victoria Arbors Elementary) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site Inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or Illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Project site is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated. s f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits. No impact is anticipated g) The Cltys Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which Is updated every two years, includes policies . and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District In the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wlldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () () () (/) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site Rev 7/22/03 ~t~(~ y2 Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page i6 ~~ S,P.f~cem ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources s;~ar~n ~ ~o~ spa ~ No d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-situ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows Q Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the sde will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to Rev 7/22/03 G, H,~ y3 Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D R C2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 ~~ SipNficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,°`~~°~ p M„w"" paGOn "'°" Sipn,fieent No I act Irico tatl 1 I handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of ail non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer, prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. ~J e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer, prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts. The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water duality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (ie, a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected Rev 7/22/03 ""1 t ' `t~ ~~ • Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 ~~ SgxficaM Leu Issues and Supporting Information Sources Spry °~a,'„ p MI'""" paban '"°" SipNfiOaM No I ect IMO ted I ect I The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system Is substantially improved and provides an Integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows Thls existing system Includes several debris dams and levees north of the Clty, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The protect site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore Impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system Includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ech a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road and Is characterized by vacant land that Is proposed for single-family development (TR16454 - KB Homes) and the Koch House (c 1891) a local historic landmark to the east, by vacant land that Is also proposed for single-family development (TR16301 -Centex Homes) to the north and west, and by "The Gardens" banquet facility to the south This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and proposed residential development to the south, east, and west. The protect well become a part of the larger community No adverse Impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation Is Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) The proposed protect Is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan Rev 7/22/03 ~ t ~ t Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 ~~ Siprvficent Lav Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,9',~"~eO,Y, a,;,~,,,, s,u ~, N, ~ ~ ~~o ~~~ ~ an ~ 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect. a) Result m the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area accordmg to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the protect result rn. a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels m () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase m ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect viandy above levels existing without the protect? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase m () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels m the protect vianity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive noise levels i Comments: a) The proposed protect is the residential subdivision of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres m the Low-Medium Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Et~wanda Specific Plan that is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards (65dBA) accordmg to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Future new construction or development should only be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features are included in the design of the homes Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply system of air conditioning will normally suffice, as indicated in Exhibit V-11 of the General Plan The Rev 7/22/03 G t ~ I J- I~ Initial Study for S U BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 La9e m~ S~prvficant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g r°'eMially Significant wrot Miupabon Then SiBrvficent Na 1 eel Inco oretetl I act I eci General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques to be included in the construction design of the homes. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Sa1d consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in Intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible In first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-sde construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above Rev 7/22/03 ~ (~ I Y 1~ Initial Study for SUBTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 I ..° 7fien Sipruficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potermally Sipnfirant WM Mitlpatlon lllen Sipnificenl No I act Inco rated I act I e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and Is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site Is located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No Impact Is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, Is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact Is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth In an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not Induce population growth Construction activities at the site well be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No Impacts are anticipated. b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facrl~tres, need /or new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construchon o/ which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other performance ob/echves /or any of the public services. a) Flre protection? O O O (~) b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools O O U (~) d) Parks O O O (`~) e) Other public faclllties~ () () () (~) Comments: ~J a) The site, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of • Base Line Road, would be served by Flre Station 173 located at 12158 Base Llne Rcad, approximately 1-mile northwest of the prolect site The prolect well not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Rev 7/22/03 G t 1 t =, 4~ Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/ D R C2 003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less man $,pnhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Prne""allY $ignficant wnn MNpaean Than $~pNhcaN No I act Inco ratetl I act I conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest existing park, Windrows Park, is located approximately 1/2 miles to the northwest A neighborhood park within Victoria Arbors is planned within 28 miles west of prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments. a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest existing park, Windrows Park, is located approximately 1/2 miles to the northwest A neighborhood park within Victoria Arbors is planned within 28 miles west of prolect site Rev 7/22/03 (~ `'~ 1'f' ~~ Initial Study for SU BTT16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less man S,pMhcant Lsa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. Pp g Pmem~miy SiBmhcant wnn Miagetlon m.n Sipmhcam Na 1 act Into rateE I 1 This protect is not proposing any significant amount of new housing or a large employment generator that would cause a substantial increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect includes the subdivision of 23 single-family lots Based on the number of lots and residential land use, the proposed subdivision will generate approximately 23 two-way peak hour vehicle trips (Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model-RCTM, Austin-Foust Associates, Inc) The proposed protect is consistent with the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that designates the area aLow-Medium Residential ~J Rev 7/22/03 ~ t N t '_ • Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D RC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Lela man S,prcflcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g POtentlelly Sipnifsent WM M,tipatlon Than Significant No I ael Inca oreletl I ad 1 District The prolect will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour taps for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 4 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated. e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated u The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated. g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect• a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signficant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments Rev 7/22/03 G,~It~.s~ Initial Study for S U B TT 16445/D R C 2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 yam man SipraficaM Lean Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant wim MNpafim man Sipniflcant NO I ace Inco orate0 I aq I ace f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's soled waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The prolect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facliities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this prolect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This prolect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Rev 7/22/03 ~ t ~ t Initial Study for SU BTT16445/DRC2003-00682 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less man SigrvficaM Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g awenna~ly Sipmficant WM Maigaoon Than Significant No I act Inco oretea 1 aet I 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site Existing eucalyptus windrows occur on-srte Development of the site will remove these trees Ordinance Number 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate an woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single truck circumference of 15 inches or more and multi-trucks having a circumference of 30 inches or more, without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City In April 2002, the applicant submitted the application for a Tree Removal Permit with appropriate fees An arborist report (Steve F Anderson, Arborist Services) was prepared on August 12, 2003, that shows all of the trees with the exception of one Eucalyptus tree are in a poor or dead condition The report recommends that the trees be removed for safety reasons Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts from the removal of trees are less than significant b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, water quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant Rev 7/22/03 ~ r C 1 ~ 1_ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16445/DRC2003-00682 Page 27 levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancrng the • benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as hawng a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Pian FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Etiwanda Specific Pian EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (/) Arborist Report prepared by Steve F Anderson, Arborist Services (August 12, 2003) Rev 7/22/03 ~ t ~ t Initial Study for S U BTT 16445/D R C2003-00682 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby~grse-to~he~proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signifycar~ environmental effects would occur Applicant's Print Name and Title City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 Date i \planning\fina~cegeWstudy pt2-5-03revfinal dx Rev 7/22/03 ~I I ~l y City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract SUBTT16445, Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682, and Variance DRC2003-01012 Public Review Period Closes: January 14, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: William Lyon Homes Project Location (also see attached map). Located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road. APN. 0227-171-06 Project Description: A residential subdivision and the development of 23 single-family lots on 6 55 acres of land includrng a request to allow up to a 10 7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary and an 8-foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Related Files Mrnor Exception DRC2003-01012, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine If the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially signrficant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project fde and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 14 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By G,~,~s~ RESOLUTION NO 04-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445, A SUBDIVISION OF 23SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 6 55 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0227-171-06. A. Recitals 1 William Lyon Homes filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Trail Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, detennmed, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to 6 55 acres of vacant property located on the west side of Etrvvanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Lme Road, and b The property to the north and west of the subject site is vacant and proposed for development (Centex Homes -Tract 16301), the property to the south consists of 'The Gardens" banquet faulity, and the property to the east is vacant and under construction with single-family homes (Tract 16454), and c The protect consists of the subdiwsion of 23 single-family lots in the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan area, and d The lot sizes range from 7,632 to 21,040 square feet, with an average lot size of 10,000 square feet, and e The two lots on the east end of the site (Lots 12 and 13) fall under the Etrvvanda Avenue Overlay Distnct and will accommodate the design of homes fronting on Etiwanda Avenue, and f The subdrnsion design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible with the Low-Medwm Distnct and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distnct of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and G t N, ~ S`}~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0409 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 2 g A Tree Removal Pertmt (DRC2003-00365) has been submitted because development of the site will regwre the removal and replacement of trees on-site, and h. A Vanance application (DRC2003-01012) has been submitted in contunction with the tract for the expansion of the wall heights to allow up to a 10 7-foot high combination wall along the south property boundary (Lots 1-12), and an 8-foot high combination wall between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a mawmum height of 6 feet. i. The site v~nll gam access from Etiwanda Avenue and the future Victona Park Lane through access agreements from Centex Homes and '~ctoria Arbors." 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a That the tentative tract is consistent v~nth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent v~nth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict vnth any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a sigmficant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval `-' I i ~ 1 J- ~.~CJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-09 SUBTT16445-WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 3 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application sub/ect to each and every cond~Lon set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannmo Division 1) All Conditions of Approval from Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 and Vanance DRC2003-01012 shall apply Huth approval of this proled. 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365, is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site The applicant/developer shall be required to remove and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Number 1 under Bro/ogical Resources listed below The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of budding and/or grading permits 3) Because of the Borer beetle infestation, all Eucalyptus tree wood shall be chipped, removed, and buned at a dump site, or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges Hnth sod, to prevent emerging Borer beetles from reinfestmg other trees or wood State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 prohibits the movement of Eucalyptus wood containing Irve Borer beetles or their larvae m trucks or traders. 4) If construction, such as for grading or block walls, results m damage or undermines the stability of newly planted vegetation that runs along the south end of the site, the vegetation shall be replaced by the applicanUdeveloper sublect to the permission of the property owner, and to the satisfaction of the City Planner 5) The penmeter wall along Etiwanda Avenue shall be made of a decorative matenal and designed to be open with a combination of real nver rock and wrought iron fencing, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 6) Prowde enhanced landscaping for lots with street frontage along . Etiwanda Avenue 7) Use slumpstone block with decorative cap and no plaster wall on the south side of the protect, to the satisfaction of the City Planner C9, t N, Z 5°1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0409 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 6) All plasters shall be made of real over rock with a decorative cap and be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size 9) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, sub/ect to review and approval by the City Planner 10) Remove the proposed retaining wall m the front setback on the south side of Lot 12 and replace with slope/mounding. 11) The applicant shalt coordinate moth Centex Homes to ensure the penmeter wall along the entire north side of 'The Gardens" banquet faclity is the same matenal and design. 12) The applicant shall get permission from adjacent property owners for s-~~`~~ any off-site grading Enaineenna Division 1) A separate detailed Stnping Plan for Etiwanda Avenue shall be required along with the Street Improvement Plan. 2) Etiwanda Avenue shall be fully improved in accordance with City "Secondary Highway" standards, including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, and sloping 3) Provide a separate nght tum lane on Etiwanda Avenue at the "Entry Street " 4) No dnveways wll be pernitted directly to Etiwanda Avenue 5) Etiwanda Avenue requires rock curb per City Standard No 105-8, which reflects a 10-inch curb face instead of a standard 8-inch curb face. 6) Provide fora "Class II" Bike Lane along Etiwanda Avenue frontage. 7) All internal local streets shall be improved to City "Local Street" standards, including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnpmg. 8) The Etrvvanda-San Sevaine Drainage Area is that portion of property lying mnthin 500 feet of the centerline of Etrvvanda Avenue The developer shall be regwred to pay the City's adopted drainage fee (Master Plan and Regional), as well as reimbursement to other development for over sizing of drainage faclities as determined by the City Engineer Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-wide detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related faclities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 00 per acre and shall be paid poor to recordation of the Final Map G , ~ (T • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-09 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 8) All pilasters shall be made of real nver rock with a decorative cap and be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches m size 9) All retaining walls visible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, sub/ect to revew and approval by the City Planner 10) Remove the proposed retaining wall in the front setback on the south side of Lot 12 and replace with slope/mounding 11) The applicant shall coordinate with Centex Homes to ensure the penmeter wall along the entire north side of "The Gardens" banquet facility is the same matenal and design 12) The applicant shall get permission from ad/scent property owners for any off-site grading f .~ 13) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the adjacent winery The wntten notice must disclose the uses and operation within the winery and be m a format approved by the City Planner pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 14) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the Victona Gardens Regional Center and the Cultural and Library Center The standard format for the wntten notice shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer prior to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 15) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of their obligation to maintain the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 16) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the adjacent 1-15 Freeway The standard format for the wntten notice shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of budding permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer prior to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 17) Provide condwt to connect to the street and pre-wire houses/bwldmgs for fiber-optic use (minimum Category 5 and RG-6), pnor to release of occupancy Plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits ~--` Enaineenng Division 1) A separate detailed Stnpmg Plan for Etiwanda Avenue shall be regwred along with the Street Improvement Plan G,N,~'~o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0409 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 5 9) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommumcationsand electncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City pnor to the issuance of budding permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted urnt amount times the length of the protect frontage Based on the street frontage, the fee is $35,202.51. 10) The developer shall tom the newly formed CFD 01-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including mterest (Resolution No. 01-066) for development of the infrastructure. The fee shall be paid m full (lump sum) pnor to recordation of the Final Map The fee amount for the anniversary date, March 1, 2004, is $24,925 38 The actual fee v~nll be determined at time of recordation 11) The developer shall also loin the newly formed CFD 2003-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including mterest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) pnor to recordation of the Final Map The fee amount for the anniversary date, March 1, 2004, is $4,818 22. The actual fee wdl be determned at time of recordation. 12) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is regwred and shall meet the approval of the Gty Engineer pnor to grading permit approval 13) Install pnvate landscaping and imgation systems m the parkways along Etrvvanda Avenue pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City. 14) Any catch basin m a sump condition shall be designed as two separate, independent catch basins, or equivalent, with a Q100 inlet for each to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15) Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rfat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to the Budding and Safety Division Forth CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction P~~.r•~ and/or demolition project G`" Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is beiing,w,property serviced and ~1 ~1 ~ W' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-09 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 6 maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading pertmts, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted rn SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted rn SCAQMD Rule 110t3 5) All construction equipment shall comply ~nnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to mrmmize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal ~n accordance Huth local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City If silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high Hnnds (r e., wand speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board ~. N, z. lp2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-09 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 6 12) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is regwred and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer pnor to grading permit approval 13) Install pnvate landscaping and imgation systems in the parkways along Etiwanda Avenue pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City 14) Any catch basin in a sump condition shall be designed as two separate, independent catch basins, or equivalent, with a 0100 inlet for each to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 15) Pnor to the issuance of bwiding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to the Bwlding and Safety Division Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 16) Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber- to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subtect to City Engineer review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits or ~ final map approval, whichever comes first 1 Environmental Mitigation Arr Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-09 SUBTTI(i445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 7 [RWOCBJ) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ~ Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews vnll shut off equipmentwhen not in use 10) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping Bro/ogical Resources 1) All Eucalyptus ~nnndrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on a3nter, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Speafic Plan standards Cultural Resoun,es 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga vwll. • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification vnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, G , N, ~. ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 0409 SUBTT16445-WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 8 important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropnate CEOA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report ~nnth onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate. Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities i Should fossils be found vnthin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soi/s 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdu.ing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated vwth vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hourto minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Cam,, N, s loa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-09 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 9 Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate. Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that vnll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submkto the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineerforcoverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit. Norse 1) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques to be included in the construction design of the homes 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of B 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, incuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04.09 SUBTT16445 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 10 4) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certdy to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Mauas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES• COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT COMMISSIONERS' ~~Nt~(~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 SUBJECT: 23-LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: WILLIAM LYON HOMES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements como~etwn Data 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ~~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copes of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-09, Standard ~~ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner sago-os 1 ~ , `I(~- l[~~ Protect No SUBTT16445 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection Distract and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sechons of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval m accordance with the ~__J_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved priorto the issuance of bwldtng permits. 9 Stx-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter. If a double wall ~~_ conditions would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the protect's perimeter. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archdect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of buddng permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barner in _/_/ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All prroate slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~~ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~_/ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy sc-io-oa z ~ t ~ ~ ~- Protect No SUBT716445 Completion Date 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engmeenng Dmsion 7. Landscaping and vrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engmeenng Division 9 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordmance (RCMC 19 08 100). E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the Issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of ail mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the destgn of the overhead structure shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSRATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, ~-/_ ~~- ~~_ ~ ~~- J~- ~~_ ~~_ ~~- SC-10-03 3 ~ ( 1 (~ Protect No SUBTT16445 Comoletion Date H. J. f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Prolect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls. ~~_ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~~_ contact the Building and Safety Diwsion staff for information and submittal regwrements Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the prolect file number (i e., SUBTT16445) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant ~~ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6 30 a m Monday ~_J_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for regwred occupancy separations. ~~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~~_ Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~_/~ time of application for grading plan check SC-10-03 4 ~ ( N ( ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT76445 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided L. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Completion Date -/-(_ -/-/- / / /-/- /_/ /_/~ /-/ /-/ / / / / -/-/- -/-/ SC-10-03 5 G, y, z` 7/ Project No SUBTT76445 Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size' Oty Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30' o c 5-Gal Fill in camaldulensis `TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERW ISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only SC-10-03 Comoleoon Date -~-~. ~~. -~-~- -~-~ -~_/. -~-~ -/-/ -/-/ Protect No SU8TT16445 Completion Date 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Cary Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residenttal street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _/_/_ sump catch basin on the public street O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, /_/ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/ /_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requrements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involve _____ ~~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-10-03 G, Lr .Z 7~ ~ Protect No SUBTT16445 Comoletion Dete 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Satety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred far all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomta registered Ctvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~ G J / / ~~- sc-i o-os s~ t N I~~ 1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION RCFPD STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Tract Map SUBTTt 6445 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 PROJECT NAME: Lyon Tract 16445 DATE: November 5,2003 PLAN TYPE: Tract Map Rewew APPLICANT NAME: William Lyon Company OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): Unknown TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: Sprinklers to mdigate access only on lots 1-4 and 20-23 _ Etlwanda South of Baseline Moises Eskenazi, Sr. Plans Examiner Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS ~ Before permit issuance The water supply and fire department access must be inspected by RCFPD staff and accepted. Call FCS for inspection at (909) 477-2713. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any bwlding , the Fire TIT l~ C ~~ 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fue flow for this protect is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Single-family Residential Plans: For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following Structures that do not meet fire department access gwdelines 2 Access Mitigation: Any structure or bulding that does not meet minimum Fire District access regwrements shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants: Pnor to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fue District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fve hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga,Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installat~on of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Building Department 3. Address Single-family. New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bulding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry ~l BIZ ~3 City of Rancho Cucamonga as MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Morntoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~,N,z~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract SUBTT16445 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ~J G, N ,~ ~5 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 Applicant: WILLIAM LYON HOMES Initial Study Prepared by: WARREN MORELION. ASSISTANT PLANNER Date: November 17. 2003 y _a 1 ~ . - ~ . . . Air Quality ' : ~~yyy~~ ~I ~ , :, ~4' I :~, ro All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Av Quality Management District SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering 1 0~ . -. .. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m CE C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other ~ swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction W ater Quality Control Board [RW OCBj) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use _~ '-Y ...t 2 of 7 .. .. -. .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 requred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Revew of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological ~?~x~," ~t ~. ,ra~~ ~?._ "_ ~.,°~ .si} ~. ~,- . , >t;.~ ~ .~~ ,~, All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall CP D Review of Plans A/C 2/3 be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) trees), 8 feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Speafic Pian standards Cultural Resources , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 t sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Revew of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines y r -a 30~ • s • 5 N .. ... _ .. .. . .. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate W here mtigation morntonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods ~ r :. ; ~~ <,4%~:-~~ ' :. :~;,,;~>~.i°a ~ - ~ =~~-u~ ;~~..y..~•n~ °.', ~u;~yi': •' -z-'~s~ ~':, '"~ , , The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 4of7 ... .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod oft-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and WaterOuahty :'~Cv ;~~~~~~ . ~ r~,._,, ; ~ ~,,,~~~= ~~- .g ~ ~ ~ ~~-~~ ,.,,,b ~~.^~^ :,; T D ;,~;~~^~~±;;'' `;r ,; ' . ,.aifur~G F<'X'Yo :eli '4 v.-o 4~na ..aa' ~ d`x~- .e~+',T*;7a ~} a ~"3R . ; , SBFiciJ:a f3 , ".~ Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall I CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the Cdy Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 N c 5 S N oZ -. .. Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nolse z- . ~>,yy^~~~. ~ , ~ ~ z: ~rA°s u r~ ~~~*:~u; . ~'{~~• ~ ,._- .~,~.~` A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City CP B Revew of report D 2/3 Planner review and approval, prior to the issuance of bwlding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques to be included in the construction design of the homes Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C Dunng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report then fmdings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actwities shall be reduced rn intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 6 of 7 .. ... -. -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Addibonally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shat) denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings zKey to Checklist Abbreviations "s Y~ N Responsible Person Monltorlrig Frequericy~'' ' Method of Vet•itication ~~ ~ ~, Sanctions~~" N,v,"~~ a ~ ~,;;~;~,• CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 - W dhhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCtion C -Plan Check 3 - W rthhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\ENVDOC\subtt16445 mmchecklist.doc 7a~ RESOLUTION NO 04-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 23SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 6 55 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0227-171-06. A Recitals. 1 William Lyon Homes filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Penmt DRC2003-00682, as descnbed rn the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Pennit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 14, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows• a The application applies to 6.55 acres of vacant property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road, and b The property to the north and west of the subject site is improved with single-family homes (Tract 16301), the property to the south consists of "The Gardens" banquet facility, and the property to the east is vacant and under construction with single-family homes (Tract 16454), and c The protect consists of the subdivision of 23 single-family lots in the Etrvvanda Specific Plan area, and d The lot sizes range from 7,632 to 21,040 square feet, with an average lot size of 10,000 square feet, and e. The two lots on the east end of the site (Lots 12 and 13) fall under the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distnct, which requires a Conditional Use Permit to ensure that development along Etiwanda Avenue meets all Specific Plan and Overlay development standards, and is consistentwith the histoncal character and quality of the street, and ~,(N,Z ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0410 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 2 f. The two lots fronting Etiwanda Avenue are 21,040 and 16,303 square feet (Lots 12 and 13, respectively), which is considerably larger than the typical Low-Medium lots in the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan area, and g Lots 12 and 13 wall accommodate the design of front-on homes along Etiwanda Avenue v~nth access from the side or rear, and h The subdivision design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible vnth the Low-Medum Residential Distnct and Etrvvanda Avenue Overlay DistnG of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and i A Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-00365) has been submitted because development of the site wdl require the removal and replacement of trees on-site, and ~ The site will gain access from Etiwanda Avenue and the future Vctona Park Lane through access agreements from William Lyon Company and "vGona Arbors." 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows. a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtedrves of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vic~nrty c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4. Based upon the facts and inforrnatron contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect well have a significant effeG upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative DeGaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mrt~gated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wdl result if the protect is approved, all sigmficant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 3 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condlion setforth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planrnna Droision 1) All Conditions of Approval from Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445 and Vanance DRC2003-01012 that relate to this application shall applywRh approval of this project. 2) Future development of the site with home product shall comply with all Etiwanda Specific Plan and Etrvvanda Avenue Overlay Distnct development standards 3) The penmeter wall along Etnvanda Avenue shall be made of a decorative matenal and designed to be open with a combination of real nver rock and wrought iron fencing, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) All pilasters shall be made of real nver rock with a decorative cap and be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size 5) The applicant shall coordinate v~nth Centex Homes to ensure the penmeter wall along the entire north side of 'The Gardens" banquet fatality is the same matenal and design 6) Use slumpstone block with decorative cap and no plaster wall on the south side of the project, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 7) The applicant shall get permission from adjacent property owners for any off-site grading 8) If construction, such as for grading or block walls, results in damage or undermines the stability of newly planted vegetation that runs along the south end of the site, the vegetation shall be replaced by the applicanUdeveloper subject to the permission of the property owner, and to the satisfaction of the Gty Planner 9) The existing nver rock curbs along Etiwanda Avenue shall be restored and/or reconstructed in conformance with adopted City standards ~I ~ ~~~ ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0410 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 10) Enhanced landscaping shall be provided for lots with street frontage o~"~ • ~~ along Etiwanda Avenue. ~(~•~,,..~i-~"''!!!'' Enameenna Division 1) A separate detailed Stnping Plan for Etrvvanda Avenue shall be required along v~nth the Street Improvement Plan 2) Etiwanda Avenue shall be fully improved in accordance vnth City "Secondary Highway" standards, including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, sigmng, and striping 3) Provide a separate nght tum Zane on Etiwanda Avenue at the "Entry Street " 4) No dnveways will be permitted directly to Etnrvanda Avenue 5) Etiwanda Avenue requves rock curb per City Standard No. 105-8, which reflects a 10.mch curb face instead of a standard &inch curb face. 6) Provide fora "Class II" Bike Lane along Etrvvanda Avenue frontage. 7) All internal local streets shall be improved to City "Local Street" standards, including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping. 8) The Etiwanda-San Sevaine Drainage Area is that portion of property lying within 500 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue The developer shall be required to pay the City's adopted drainage fee (Master Plan and Regional), as well as reimbursement to other development for over sizing of drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-~nnde detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 00 per acre and shall be paid prior to recordation of the Final Map 9) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and eledncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the Cdy pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the length of the proled frontage Based on the street frontage, the fee is $35,202 51. 10) The developer shall loin the newly formed CFD 01-01 and pay the necessary fav share portion, including interest (Resolution No 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) pnor to recordation of the Final Map The fee amount for the ~t~t= ~~Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 10) Enhanced landscaping shall be provided for lots with street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue 11) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the adtacent winery The wntten notice must disclose the uses and operation within the winery and be m a format approved by the City Planner pnor to issuance of buildrng permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 12) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the Yctona Gardens Regional Center and the Cultural and Library Center The standard format for the wntten notice shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of bwlding permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 13) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of their obligation to maintain the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 14) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the adtacent 1-15 Freeway The standard format for the wntten notice shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 15) Provide conduit to connect to the street and pre-wire houses/buildings for fiber-optic use (minimum Category 5 and RG-8), pnor to release of occupancy Plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits Engmeenna Diwsion 1) A separate detailed Stnping Plan for Etiwanda Avenue shall be regwred along with the Street Improvement Plan 2) Etiwanda Avenue shall be fully improved m accordance with City "Secondary Highway" standards, including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, and stnping 3) Provide a separate nght tum lane on Etiwanda Avenue at the "Entry Street " 4) No dnveways will be permitted directly to Etiwanda Avenue 5) Etiwanda Avenue regwres rock curb per City Standard No 105-B, which reflects a 10-inch curb face instead of a standard 8-inch curb face G,~,sB~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 6 15) Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Gty Fomt CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building perrnit application is submitted to the Budding and Safety Division Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division vnthin 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition oroiect 16) Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber- to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of budding perrnits or final map approval, whichever comes first Environmental Miligation Arr Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be mamtamed ~n good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and mamtamed as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply v~nth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering G, H, ~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 5 anniversary date, March 1, 2004, is $24,925.38. The actual fee will be deterrnined at time of recordation 11) The developer shall also loin the newly formed CFD 2003-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including interest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) pnor to recordation of the Final Map The fee amount for the anniversary date, March 1, 2004, is $4,818 22 The actual fee wall be deterrnined at time of recordation. 12) A Water Cluality Management Plan (WQMP) is regwred and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer pnor to grading permit approval C~ - 13) Install pnvate landscaping and imgation systems in the parkways along Etiwanda Avenue pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City 14) Any catch basin in a sump condition shall be designed as two separate, independent catch basins, or egwvalent, with a Q100 inlet for each to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15) Pnor to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable dat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the Gty. Form CD•1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to the Bwlding and Safety Dmsion Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficat~on 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment well be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Staff G , N t Z ~`~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 6 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphak shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rute 1108. 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance wrath local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high wends p e., v~nnd speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) m accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements. • Mamtam a minimum 24-mch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemattve fuel powered egwpment where feasible `-' 1 l ~ I J- U U PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 7 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resoun:es 1) All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8-feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etnvanda Speafic Plan standards Cultural Resoun~s 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or . during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction adrvities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga vinll. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites wnthin new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse proled effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, folloNnng appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudion field surveyof the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that ~I N,~ $~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0410 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 8 will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures• • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sor/s 1) The site shall be treated wrath water or other soil-stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hourto minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration indude Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 9 pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval Pnor to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of intenor noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding matenals and construction techniques to be included in the construction design of the homes 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times maybe required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then constrvcbon activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings G,H,z ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0410 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 10 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the folloNnng vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. ~I ~t~ ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2003-00682 SUBJECT: 23-LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: WILLIAM LYON HOMES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-10, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requved to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentatve parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of thre~,CityJ~Planner SC-10.03 1 vl I t 11~ ~3 Completion Dete ~~- _/~ / / -/-/- ~_/- Project No DRC2003-00682 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Diwsion to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~ submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 Ail site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwiding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~~ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engrneer rewew and approved pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits 9 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ~___/_ conditions would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoimng property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing wails/fences along the profect's perimeter. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping m ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdvision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier m ~~ accordance with the Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 ~~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~~ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or largersize shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy sc-io-os z ~ , Cl f ~ ~~ Prgect No DRC2003-00662 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously • maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included In the required landscape plans and shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decoratwe treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 9 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and Irrigation of these trees shall comply with the Citys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100). E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner In the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures . Failure to complete all actions requued by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forted. F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSRATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Fioor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, . e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, Comoledon Date ~~_ ~~_ _/___/_ ~ ~~- ~~. -J___J_ ~~- ~~- SC-10.03 3 ~ t ~ ~~ ~ 1 Protect No DRC2003-00682 Comoletion Dete H. J. f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls. _/~- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~~_ contact the Bulding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00682) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drarnage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Offiaal after tract/parcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Califomia Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'high wind' instructions ~~_ Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading ~_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/~_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~~ time of application for grading plan check SC-10-03 4 ~ . ~ 1 ~ 1\Q Protect No DRC2003-00682 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 3 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the publlcright-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided L. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefacilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drrve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffc signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Completion Date I / I / / / -//- _/_/_ / / / / /-/- / / / / / / -/. SC-10-03 5 / Uj S p Protect No DRC2003-00682 Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Ctty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash \ deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded J upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size' Qty Etiwanda Avenue Eucalyptus Red Gum 8' 30' o c 5-Gal Fill in camaldulensis 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient defiaencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Completion Date ~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / I / / / -~-~- SC-10-03 6 6, / ~ ~ 1i O 7// Protect No DRC2003-00682 M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overFlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Completion Date / / / / / / / I / / / / I / -/-/- / / / / -/- - SC-10-03 7 G 11 ~ g '7 Protect No DRC2003-00682 Completion Date 4 The final grading, appropriate submitted, and approved by the permds certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, Bwlding and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwlding A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civt1 Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ,~~_ i ~_~- ~~- SC-10-03 5 ~ ~ ~ ( 1.. ~ l FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION RCFPD STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Tract Map SUBTT16445 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 PROJECT NAME: _Lyon Tract 16445 DATE: November 5.2003 PLAN TYPE: Tract Map Review APPLICANT NAME: William Lvon Com OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): Unknown TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: Moises Eskenazi, Sr Plans Examiner Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS -' Before permit issuance The water supply and fire department access must be inspected by RCFPD staff and accepted. Call FCS for inspection at (909) 477-2713. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply uenerai uwaance ror rare riyaranrs: i ne rouowing prowaes general gwcance ror me spacing aria location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants. a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs. 5 The location of fue hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fve District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building ~ Contact the(F,~ire Safety Divi1sion (909) 477-2770 i 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The regwred fire flow for this protect is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This regwrement is made in accordance with Fue Code Appendix III-A, as amended Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Single-family Residential Plans: For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fve District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following Structures that do not meet fve department access gwdelines 2 Access Mitigation: Any structure or building that does not meet minimum Fve Distract access regwrements shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notiee Required plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Bulding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, HeaRh and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any bwiding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water Distract On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Dvision Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: Ali fve hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fve hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers ° On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Building Department 3 Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bulding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~, ~ N,Z loo Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract SUBTT16445 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated arcumstances may arse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. ~-~I I ~f~i Iv1 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16445 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00682 Applicant: WILLIAM LYON HOMES Initial Study Prepared by: WARREN MORELION. ASSISTANT PLANNER Date: November 17. 2003 N 0 N .. . - ... •. .. Air Quahry E• ~` : ~ ° *~°x x ! Ali construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speaficahons Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Rewew of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering 1 ~' .. .. ... .. . . • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of plans •A/C y4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Rewew of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other ~ suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C Durng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction i Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabtlizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 2 of 7 .. .. • - -. .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate high efficiencyAow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C Z4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biological w -~'~~ r ~_j ~°y~~"'}; v k All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall CP D Review of Plans A/C 2/3 be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) trees), 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Spastic Plan standards Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualdied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demoldion or significant modittcation without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines 7 s i s 3 7 s ~' LJ .. ... -. .. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Rewew of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be I~mited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Rewew of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area berng cleared BO B/C Rewew of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actiwties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage _ If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the fmd • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Rewew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum tGeology and Sods ~, ~ . , .,,~_,~ ~, ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~~ ~.~ ~~ ~ . K w The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 4of7 ~' ,s i J J ... -. .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A q RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~ "~w:w°;_~~ ~~~~ ° ~ ~ ~ p'~~ ;,~• t, ~~~~,~.~~ ~,. Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and ~dentitying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 ~ 5o~i s N i -, • .. ... -. . . . . . . .. . . . Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 shall submit to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit NOISO )~y)+..a~ ~ .~ °°~,ti °~7c"<A~~ny^y~''~~"y.',~ ~ " " t ~~ fi`*,. ~- un'" ~ r = L'x =i'p~^~ '" +MS r1..~v . d bt.1'N Y r`df. ..A a~~~., a A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City CP B Review of report D y3 Planner review and approval, prior to the issuance of bwlding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques to be included in the construction design of the homes Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specit~ed in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 6 of 7 • .. -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings zKey to Checklist Abbreviations s Responsible Person ~ Monitoring Frequericyx"' •Method of Vet'ification ~~""i~~'" ~~' ._~.. -Sanctions ~`>~; ~'~~`'~,. CDD -Community Development Duector or designee A - W dh Each New Development A - On-sde Inspection 1 - W rthhoid Recordation of Fnal Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ('.OrIStNCtIOn C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separete Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Ober PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdation l ~I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\ENVDOC\subtt16445 mmcheckllst doc 7 . RESOLUTION NO. 04-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 TO INCREASE WALL HEIGHT TO ALLOW UP TO A 10.7 FOOT HIGH COMBINATION WALLALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOTS 1-12), AND AN &FOOT HIGH COMBINATION WALL BETWEEN LOTS 10 AND 11, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDAAVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN. 0227-171-06. A. Recitals 1. William Lyon Homes filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DRC2003-01012 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Vanance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidenn: presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 14, 2004, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to 6 55 acres of vacant property located on the west side of Etrvvanda Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line Road, and b. The property to the north and west of the subject site is vacant and proposed for development (Centex Homes -Tract 16301), the property to the south consists of 'The Gardens" banquet fanlity, and the property to the east is vacant and under construction with single-family homes (Tract 16454), and c The applicant is requesting a Vanann: (DRC2003-01012) in contunction with Tentative Tract Map 16445 for the expansion of the wall heights to allow up to a 10 7-foot high combination wall along to south property boundary (Lots 1-12), and an 8-foot high combination wall • between Lots 10 and 11, in a residential zone where the Development Code allows a mawmum height of 6 feet d Stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship in that limiting wall heights at the rear of ~t~t~ \~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0411 VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 2 the lots would create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," with slopes that are hard to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards. e There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances orcondilions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generely to other properties in the same district, in that the property is surrounded by development, with proposed residential development (Tract 16301) to the north and west, Etiwanda Avenue directly to the east, and the ewsting 'The Gardens" banquet faalrty to the south, that limits the creative capability of plating walls along the property boundanes Creating a terrace wall design on-site would create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," with slopes that are harct to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards f Stnd or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of pnvileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnd, in that it would essentially reduce the usable lot sizes for those lots on the south side of the property, and create a double wall condition that would create a "no man's land," with slopes that are hard to maintain and that would allow visibility into the rear yards. g Granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties Gassified in the same district, in that other properties with similar site and wall conditions would warrant the granting of a Vanance h Granting of the Variance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, in that the wall will be constructed per building code and with a decorative matenal to match existing perimeter walls in the area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the spegfied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistentwith the ob~edrves of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or condtions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnd c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specfied regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct d That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district e. That the granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-11 VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 3 (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below Plamm~a Division: 1) All Conditions of Approval from Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16445 and Conddional Use Permit DRC2003-00682 that relate to this application shall appy v~nth approval of this pro~ecl 2) The penmeter wall along the south property boundary shall be made of a decorative matenal, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) If construction, such as for grading or block walls, results in damage or undermines the stability of newly planted vegetation that runs along the south end of the site, the vegetation shall be replaced by the applita3nt/developer subject to the pertmssion of the property owner, and to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner 4) All retairnng walls wsible to the public shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, sub~ecl to review and approval by the City Planner 5) The applicant shall coordinate with Centex Homes to ensure the penmeter wall along the entire north side of "The Gardens" banquet fatality is the same matenal and design The applicant shall get pertmssion from adjacent property owners for any off- site grading 6 The SetaBtary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Richard Mataas, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0411 VARIANCE DRC2003-01012 -WILLIAM LYON HOMES January 14, 2004 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the folloHnng vote-to-wd AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: \_ J T H E C I T Y ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner gy Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16180 - L.D. KING, INC. - A request to subdivide 3 37 acres into 4 lots in the Very Low Residential District (.1-2 Dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located at the southeast corner of Banyan Street and Greenwood Place - APN: 0225-171-23 and 26. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308. . PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Protect Density: 1.19 dwelling units per acre. B. Surroundmo Land Use and Zonma~ North - Single-Family Residential and Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Estate Residential (.1-1 dwelling unit per acre) South - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Speafic Plan, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations: Prolect Site - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics The subtect property is within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District The protect is surrounded by single-family residential . development to the north, south, and west Immediately to the east is a vacant undeveloped parcel In which the applicant has created a Conceptual Master Plan for future development (Exhibit "D") The site slopes from north to south with one single- family dwelling located directly on the southeast corner of Banyan Street and ITEM "J" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16180 - L D. KING, INC. January 14, 2004 Page 2 Greenwood Place The site has one existing remnant Eucalyptus windrow that runs along the center of the property. ANALYSIS' A. General• The applicant is proposing to subdivide 3 37 acres of land into four parcels, which wdl include three parcels for single-family development and one for the identified existing single-family home that is to remain. The three new vacant lots wdl all gain access from Greenwood Place. As a condition of approval, access to Banyan Street for Lot 1 will be eliminated also only allowing it access from Greenwood Place. The project includes the development of a local feeder trail at the rear of Lots 2 through 4. In addition, a Community Tract is proposed across the frontage of Lot 1, on the south side of Banyan Street where the existing home is located. The average lot size is 36,724 square feet which exceeds the 25,000 square foot average required in the Very Low Residential Distract of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan. The proposed lot sizes are as follows: Parcel 1 (with existing residence) 33,625 square feet Parcel 2 37,992 square feet Parcel 3 37,791 square feet Parcel 4 37,489 square feet 36,724 average square feet B. Desion Review Committee On November 18, 2003, the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Fletcher, Buller) reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to staff comments with the additional conditions that the Community Tract along the north side of the project frontage be improved and the existing drive access on Banyan Street be eliminated (Exhibit "F"). C. Technical Review and Gradino Committees: The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee recommended approval of the project subtect to the deletion of Condition No. 2, which required vehicle gates, since it was not applicable in this case In addition, a condition to provide a Fence Wall Master Plan for Planning Commission consideration in conformance with the Trail policies was recommended. A condition of approval will require a uniform wall design for the protect, subtect to review and approval by the City Planner u E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308. The applicant is requesting removal of a remnant Eucalyptus windrow consisting of 21 trees The existing windrow runs more or less in the center of the site and includes 6 Eucalyptus camadulensis trees (Red Gum) and 15 Eucalyptus globu/oust trees (Blue Gum). An arborist report was prepared for the site (Jim Borer, March 7, 2003) that concluded that the trees are in very poor condition, in fact dead or dying, particularly from Borer beetle infestation. The study concluded that PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16180 - L.D. KING, INC. • January 14, 2004 Page 3 removal is unavoidable. To meet replacement requirements, conditions of approval require all Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal to be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. F. Environmental Assessment: This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions). The prolect is within an urbanized area zoned for residential use, involves the division of property into fewer than five parcels in conformance with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, no variances are required, all utility services and street access to the parcels meeting local standards are available, the property has not been part of a subdivision within the last two years, and the parcels do not have an average slope of greater than 20 percent. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the prolect site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16180 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308, through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•WM:mlg Attachments• Exhibtt'A' - Site Utilization Map Exhibit °B' Exhibit °C' Exhibit "D° Exhibit °E° Exhibit `F° Draft Resol - Conceptual Grading Plan - Tentative Parcel Map - Conceptual Master Plan - Horse Corral Exhibit - Design Rewew Committee Action Agenda dated November 18, 2003 ution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16180 0 r W r > ~ _ O E' F' Z~- ~ a F~ ~ ~ _t Z ~ W J o N ~V ~ ~` 1 I 1 f~ ii ~~ i I~ ;~~ ~ja + ~!: -~,,! ~3~~~F~ ~i i~; 1.Fi~ ~._#~ ~1„ „t~t~i s~ei. ~~~ ~I I~ ~I _ ~~ ~!° ~ !i u } ~ ~~ 4 a... ~ ~----- Lr_-__ I~ I~ bq I ~m .s "1""+ r v ~e •~ .r I I 5 6 ~ ~ ~ _ > o ~ -z c~ a d J Fa _~ W W ~ V ~ ~ ~ d o~ ~ 3 k W ~ ~ ~ O F. _ ~ a b ~~ a Z ~ W J ~~~ ~~ 0 ~~ :! i~~ --, a~ jo ~ -- a ~ ~ ie~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ i{ t~ #,~ ~9 s#~~ ~tL~#fi ~ 3d~ ~ ii ! ~ i 1 ~ 1 ~ i ~~~1~Ii ~ d j, ei~ ; -- ~ i~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ 1 v ~ W ~ ,~ O a S v 0 ~$ ~~ ~; i ~- ~ d e ~~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ~WW p: W O i i i i I 1 ~ ~ ~. •~ a i ; ~ i i3 ~ i ~ ~! 1 1 ~ I I~~ 'dam I; t i ~ ml"_ I a 11~ I ml 1r-1------------------------------------------1 'S, I '1 I I II 9 z/ z e w L ___ 1 64 N Y'1 ANOl07 tl4 N YM 117 I I o I _I / / \ ~ uc ~. n1a ~ - -------------r-- N I I ~ 1 -------a- +- ------ ---r- , ----- ---=-r- m • ~i i' r('~~ ~ I g I 1~ I I~ I __a c~ Z I I~ ' 1\ i 1 ~ I 1~ / I ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~/ ' \ ' / 1 1 Y u i~ i ° ---, ' r----, I i---- ~~ G ~ I i ~ f ; ~ I~ I I ~I I ~ I yl I ~- ~e ~ ~7 I ~ I I ~ ' ~ A 1 I I~,,,,,r 1 1 I 11~~ ` ______ _ --~ i L_ J i L---- ~ I y~ // 1 ~ I' ~ p i i i =- m o ~ I ' ,~________~ ~ / o It}I ""~ i e -z -- z'~ - - - -boy - aoanN33a 4 I i - - 31~ ~ . n -' I I' ~ 1'-, __ u l i~ ~ i ~~~ i t i i it i '' ili i ~ --lip l~ ~j I ~ F ------ -----' ! ~----- •----' 1 1 __-J 1 1 IGL+fi~/fLZ fW I ZMZNl L~VNl I I' 1 ~ ~l ~ u J DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:20 p.m. Warren Morelion November 18, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPSUBTPM16180-LD KING- A request to subdivide 3.78 acres into 4 lots in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Banyan Avenue and Greenwood Place - APN: 0225-171-26 and 23. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308. Design Parameters: The subject property, located at the southeast corner of Banyan Avenue and Greenwood Place, and is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestnan Overlay Distract. The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, south, and west. Immediately to the east is a vacant undeveloped parcel. The site has a slight slope from north to south with one single-family dwelling located directlyon the southeast corner of Banyan Avenue and Greenwood Place. Existing Eucalyptus windrows are proposed to be removed; hence, would regwre replacement planting in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan standards. The parcel map proposes subdivision into four lots (three parcels for single-family residential development, with one lot created for the identified existing single-family dwelling that is to remain. The three new lots would all access from Greenwood Place. The proposed project includes a local feeder trail to the rear of each residential lot In addition, a CommunityTrad rs proposed across the frontage of Lot 1 (the south side of Banyan Avenue). The average lot size is 36,724 square feet which exceeds the 25,000 square foot average required by the Etiwanda Speafic Plan As requested by staff, the applicant has provided a master plan showing how the property to the east (the last remaining piece in the block) could be developed. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide a decorative block wall around the project penmeter. Where there is an existing or proposed equestrian trail, the wall should be located on the inside edge (house side) of easement, with appropriate gates to access to the rear of each lot. 2. Replace Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrows in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan standards: replace with Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) spaced 8 feet on center generally along 330-foot x 660-foot grad, at a rate of 50 linear feet per acre. Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends approval of the project subject to the comments noted above. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present. Larry McNiel, Richard Fletcher, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Warren Morelion The Committee reviewed the project and recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subject to the above-mentioned comments with the following additional conditions: 1 '~ 1. Improve the Community Trail along the north side of the project frontage. 2 Eliminate the existing drive access on Banyan Street. RESOLUTION NO 04-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16180, A SUBDIVISION OF 4 PARCELS ON APPROXIMATELY 3 37 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN AVENUE AND GREENWOOD PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF- APN. 0225-171-23 AND 26. A. Recitals. 1. L D. King, Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No.16180, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic heanng on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwAh public testimony, this Commission hereby speufically finds as follows: a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Banyan Street and Greenwood Place, and b. The properly is presently improved vv~th one existing single-family home at the northwest comer of the site; and c. The property to the north of the subject site includes-single famiy development and vacant land, the property to the east consists of vacant land, and the properties to the south and west include single-family development, and d. The application is to subdivide approximately 3.37 acres of land into 4 parcels consisting of the following square footages; and Parcel 1 with existin residence 33,625 s uare feet Parcel 2 37,992 s uare feet Parcel 3 37,791 s uare feet Parcel 4 37,489 s uare feet 36,724 avers e s uare feet J `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0412 SUBTPM16180 - L D KING, INC. January 14, 2004 Page 2 e. An ewsting remnant Eucalyptus windrow consisting of 21 trees runs through the center of the sde; and f. The applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308 forthe removal of the 21 Eucalyptus trees on-site; and g. A Community Trail exists on the south side of Banyan Street at the north side ofthe project site, and h. A local equestrian feeder trail is proposed at the rear of Lots 2 through 4, and i. Access into all four lots will be from Greenwood Place. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commrssion hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the . General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physicaly suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable rntury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f. The desrgn of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. The Planning Commission concurs with the staff deterrnination that this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Class 15 Exemption -Minor Land Divisions). All requirements for use of that exemption have been satisfied, mduding but not limited to, zoning, number of parcels, utility service and access, prior subdivision and average slope. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannmc Division 1) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have unifomt design compatible to those m the area, to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0412 SUBTPM16180 - L D KING, INC January 14, 2004 . Page 3 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00308 is hereby approved. All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus macu/ata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Speafic Plan In addition, new windrows shall be planted at a rate of 50 linear feet per acre per Etiwanda Speafic Plan 3) Because of Borer beetle infestation, all Eucalyptus tree wood shall be chipped, removed and buned at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with sod, to prevent emerging Borer beetles from reinfesting other trees orwood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live Borer beetles, or their larvae, in trucks or traders is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. 4) Improve a CommunityTrail within the parkway of Banyan Avenue. 5) Relocate the perimeter wall on the north side of the project so it is on the property line. 6) Provide crossing over 'V' gutter along south tract boundary to allow access for equines and vehicles into the rear yard of the lots The crossing shall be concrete with roughened textured finish and a minimum 10 feet wide. 7) Install minimum 10-foot wide gates in trail fencing to provide access to the rear yard at all lots. Enoineering Division 1) Banyan Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Local Street" standards and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Figure 5-39, including but not limited to the following: a) Protect existing curb and gutter, streetlight, R26(s) "No Stopping" signs and asphalt pavement or repair as required. b) Install Community Trail improvements per City Standards DraHnng No. 1003 (front-on) c) The existing dnveway for Parcel 1 to be relocated to Greenwood Place. 2) Greenwood Place frontage improvements to be in accordanaa with City "Local Residential" standards, including but not limded to the following• a) Protect existing curb and gutter, streetlights, sidewalk, and asphalt pavement or repair as regwred. S~'L. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-12 SUBTPM16180 - L D. KING, INC January 14, 2004 Page 4 b) Install drive approaches and street trees perCity Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, upon development. 3) Revise City Drawing Nos. 1587 and 1417 to reflect the above public improvements to the satisfaction of the Gty Engineer. 4) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and identity applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plans. 5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Forth CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engneenng Division when the first Building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Division. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division ~nnthin 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS , ABSENT' COMMISSIONERS: ~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM16180 SUBJECT: FOUR-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: L.D KING, INC. LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND GREENWOOD PLACE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sots expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its, agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Diwsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes lust. '~"~ SC-10.03 1 ~1 `~ Completion Date ~~ ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM76180 Completion Date D. E. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the ~ time of bwlding permit issuance. 5. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Forsingle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed ~-J- control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developershall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in confunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced ~~ with two-rail, 4-inch Iodgepole °peeler° logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. b. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _J~- distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official c. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail ~~_ with a maximum slope of 5.1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. d. For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at ~~ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. the e wne t rohibit the kee in h ll CC&R ~~! g p p g a no s) s 7. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions ( animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdmsions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 8. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ~~ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs fvst. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of then oNicers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage drnreways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street ~~ Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. S~_,~ 2 ~s Protect No SUBTPM18180 Comoletwn Date 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or largersize shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 21 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each indroidual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner revew and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Division. 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S. Postal Service to determine the appropnate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permRs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements Submd five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and ~_~_ ~J- ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~ ~~ SC-10-03 3 ~~ PrgectNo SUBTPM16180 Completion Date H. J. g. Planning Dvision Protect Number (i e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearty identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet° signature are regwred poor to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~-I the Cary poor to permit issuance. 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~~- 5 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can ~~ contact the Building and Safety Diwsion staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~~ marked with the protect file number (i e., SUBTPM161 SO). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Division foravailabdiryof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Poor to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant ~~_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may rnclude, but are not I~mded to: Cary Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division poor to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map ~~ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permts. ~ 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 6'00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. Monday ~~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. New Structures 1 Provde compliance with the Califomia Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2. Provide compliance with the Calrfomia Bwlding Code for regwred occupancy separations. ~~ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'high wind° instructions. ~~ Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be rn accordance with Califomia Building Code, Cdy Grading ~~ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to -J~- pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engrneer or geologist and submitted at the ~~ time of application for grading plan check. 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~ submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official poor to the issuance of budding ~ permits sc-~o-o3 a S~~ Protect No SUBTPM16180 Completion Date 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomla registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access L. Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and vrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this rtem. Improvement Plans and Construction: ~~ Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, streettrees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faalities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communltytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bulding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buldings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements requred by these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Banyan Street x x x x Greenwood Place x x SC-10.03 5 ~~ _~_~_ ~~- ~~_ ~J- ~~- ~~ ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16180 Comoletion Date b Pnor to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wuing Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shalt remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are requir9d A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and pawng, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer. Mln. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size• qty. Banyan Street Platanus acerifolia London Plane tree 8' 30' o c. 15-gal Greenwood Place Cercis Canadensls Eastern Redbud 5' 25' o c. 15-gal 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. ~~i ~J ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~_ ~~- SC-10-03 ii ~' Protect No SUBTPM16180 Comolehon Date s Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for ail protect intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as requred M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to Loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be ailed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. N. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacent areas. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sc-,0-oa 7 S2S~ -,- ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT '~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: SUBTPM16180 PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: SUBTPM16180 TPM16180 September 8, 2003 PLAN TYPE: 4 - SFR Parcel map APPLICANT NAME: L D King, Inc. OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: Unknown None 12715 Plans Examiner PLANNER: Warren Morelion Z uiiuiii i oii~ouo , iiriiiiuuu ii, ~,iuii, ,.ui,.,ii 'oi , ,i, uuii~i,~,i, uisuuumiii~u~i,.v ioium' ,loin uiiuui,~ THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS MAY APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, must be complete during the plan check process and construction of the project. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1. Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this protect is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Contact CCW D to request the available fire flow. 2. Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fve District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size. 4 Single-family Residential Plans: For single-family residential and accessory structures show all fve hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. v L~ PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Public Installation: All requued public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fue Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fue hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fue hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, 'Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers.' On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 2 Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or extemaliy illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible Trom the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. Fire District Forms and Letters Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions Issued by the Planning Division referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included. Contact the Fire Safety Division }or copies of forms or letters. The forms and letter are also found in previously Issued Fire Distract comments. S2Z • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONt Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS - A request to construct a 13,855 square foot office and retail building on 1.70 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-191-10 Related Flle. Preliminary Review DRC2002-00337 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonmg• North - Multiple-Family Residential, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Shopping Center, Neighborhood Commercial East - Mobile Home Park; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Retail Building, Neighborhood Commercial B General Plan Designations: Protect Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Neighborhood Commercial C. Site Characteristics The project site is a grass pad located within an existing shopping center that was entitled under Conditional Use Permit 134-13 The project site originally was master-planned for an 18,000 square foot retail building. Hollywood Video is located on the adjacent parcel to the west D, Parking Calculations . Tvoe of Use Veterinary Office Restaurant Retail Parking Totals Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Footage Ratio Required Provided 6,234 1/200 31 1,113 1/100 11 6,520 1/250 26 68 73 ITEM "N" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 • Page 2 ANALYSIS' A General. A condition of approval for the shopping center to the west (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) regwres that future bwldings be consistent with the Mission architectural style. The proposed office and retail building has been designed to incorporate elements of the Mission style and blend with the adtacent Hollywood Video bwldmg by matching the form, Spanish file roof, exposed rafter tads, and columns. A colonnade exists on the south elevation, and partial colonnade is located on the east elevation and wraps around to a portion of the north elevation The project is designed to accommodate a veterinarian hospital in the rear portion of the budding and small retail shops and a restaurant use near the plaza area. The proposed design also introduces new architectural elements, including a stacked stone tower with spandrel glass that will be backlit and acrescent-shaped outdoor plaza at the southeast corner of the bwldmg. B. Design Review Committee• The protect was reviewed on November 18, 2003 The Committee (Fletcher, McNiel, and Buller) recommended approval, subtect to minor design modifications that have been included as conditions in the attached Resolution of Approval. . C Grading Rewew Committee• The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on November 18, 2003 The Committee recommended approval, with a condition requinng a landscape planter and a concrete walkway adtacent to parking stalls near the westerly property line The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. D Technical Review Committee The Techrncal Rewew Committees reviewed the protect on November 18, 2003, and recommended approval subtect to the standard conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist Staff concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on November 24, 2003, at a nearby elementary school No residents attended the meeting CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, and the property was posted with a large 4-foot x 8-foot'Notice Of Filing' sign. . NZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Development Rewew DRC2003-00324 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Br uller City Planner BB DG:mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Grading Plan Exhibit °D" -Floor Plans Exhibit °E° - Bwlding Elevations Exhibit "F° -Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" -Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated November 18, 2003 Exhibit °H° -Initial Study Draft Resol ution of Approval for Development Rewew DRC2003-00324 N3 V9NOWVJf1J OHJNV?J NOll]f121JSNOJ M3N dZ d'Id ~S~g H~1~Id2I g~~~Pw ~ ~~~s $ w ~ „ y~ ,ca-f~zT ~~~~ n l ynnln;.;y ~(~] nu~nlyv I I I I ~I NOLLJfRiJSNOJ M3N °nm ~ dZdZd ~ ~ ~^^°u ~• n ~~' ~® m'„_ Sg r~ ~sdg x~Ndx ~~ ~ ~ ~ it ~~=~o ~,~ 0 II ~~~;:I. .i! ' I ,. . II II Lr I I I li' u I I I II I I I II II a = i ^ O ~1 IC ~ m I" -a~a =_,,,~= ~~ I: I I- 1 I I :~ I I - i~ o . ~ __ 5 -_-- ----- '---5.-...-. L....---------------------- --------'-----,d..-rr------ rr--X t't`L~~~ g a W C: ~ ~o ~~~ dig' ~Ie.si~E~ ~ig~lg{~~~! ~~Po°`iiiaiii ~ aa aii II ~~igli9f~~i~l.~e I . ~ ~~ b i I - V `JNNWVJ(1~ OHJNt/?J -~~ NOIJ~f1bJSNOJ AA3N VZV'Id ~S~'g H~I~Id2I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~® f I - ----f" ---- -- ~ !ii I r I ~~ - ----- - - - - ---- - - ~ I _' II I ` _~' I I I , 1 ~ ~_~L,r, ~® ~® o°~ ~ ill ,` --,rC I I 4 I •1 I ~ o I 1 7 ~ ~ ~ ~' I t I ' I Y ® I ~ c ~~ I ~ l f 1 1 ` 4 k ~ ~ ~ l~ I - y ; ` LI .,I tc z ~ E 9 _ ; ~®~ ~ : -- .. - '.. .~.. ~ - - ~ I - -- - I 1 , , ~ _ I = W III ~ 1 m 1 ~ I C I o I ~ ' d , ~ I , ;, / I ~ ~ ~ .r . I I g J Y ! ` ~ I !T ~ 93 ~ , ~ II I ~~ ' ~ I I I „G"~W =ae z~ ~"-J~~ ~~ ~,$P, ~~ I A P1 _ -~~ P I .~ ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-4~ I 555 I, ,I ^ ^ 1 ~. .mow----'._ ly •I , ~' ~ m 'I 1~ I ~ r1 • F~ i _____~-1 -! II~_-~_--_________-L I ____----__~______ I ` I awl .... - ______ 1~ r_ -__.________~1______----__~~____ I - 11 ~ I. 90 1r ~ % i I I I _ _ _ 1• I I ~ ~ _ - ,~ I ~ l ~ i. __~ ~ li ' ~ I - ----- I 1 I I I `, 1 \ ' 1 I I ~I ~I ~ ~\ I -_ ! I 1\ r 1 ~, =1 :~ ----- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ~C~~zT ~ _ -------~ __ W r_ W V W Z w ` N m g a c~ a9Z t~ g ~~ Z~ _~ ~; i A HJI ~.In I"IH'~1(~'1 flN ~)MHZJ y ~ ~ ~ ~ q NOJ M3N NOLLOf121J5 ~ j ~SdH H~I~Id2I IIIB~ ~ ~ s aaa~ ~ Q la ~ si E ~I !~ c Z '~g~ ~ ~~.~~~ N v U ~ ~ ~ $m~B=~ ~~,~~~~~~s~~~r~ ~~~~ ~p ~~~ a ~ ws ~ 5 ~ ~=~az~~o~_pa=COW3 ~Q~'t~~ saQ{1N~~ ~~~a a ~~ ~W~~W C FJ~N ~~Vym~~$~~~~Y ~ Y wYW ~ ~~~ 'q ~ ~ W o ~"~Y ~s~~~;F~ :~~ g~5 ~ 4 °o'm i'aW"°a~W~W~;'z ~ z~y'e ~~ W~~ a ss_gW E ?`o auto°aoa~~m "~F~+h;~_~~~~b-~ -~ v~o~~ ~ °g~ ~ s~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~a a ~~~~~ ~~~~~ g~ na~~~$~~~ ~~ s Na~~~ ~~~=~ ~an~x p8 ~~e~°o°' ~~ F+r 38~ M G„ ~g~~V~ ~~ ''. ~~~ o~4 Wg~ b~ C7 p c ~. t /k ~ s Y9t V 9 N`~ e W 9L W 9 I _ ~ ~ ~ o n e a NOIL~ 2ll~SN00 M3N ~ 5~ tl Z tl '1 d I I~ ~ m~~ ~SVH H~Nd2I IIIg ~ -~ r 00 ~O O O O ® J00 I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~/ t I j II ~~ I i~ I II I o- --- - ~ - ~_ __- -__~ ® I I II I e L__ II I O =___= i r-- - _-~ ~.. 1 -- -~-- I~-- -- I , I ~ I II I II I O L ,~ I~-~~r- , i ~ o- ---- I ~ ~) I .i j ~\ I Q - ---- w I ~ I~ v e I ~~ I r~ i0 I I i+ I I I i I i li'i i ~i ,»w i L J \/ I I _-___ I _f _-_ __ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~; ~~ Y ~~~~ 6i u \\ \\ 1 u Ipo j j -l I I I --~- ---- I I I I I I ~ I ~ Y I j ~ '® j '' 43 I, I ;~ 8 ~ _~, !__ II I I I ~ I I; Zge I I ~ I I; 6 LJ --T~ - ~ I I , ~` C ~ I I pl I ® I;~°~ j I ~ II a~~ I , II ~ ---- I I l I ~ I ~ II I I ' j ~ I I , -~ j , I , I I ---- I I II I ~ I ' --~ I II I I ._~~ _-___-~-__ - -~I "-__ r~norr..~ao~rm ~~ , ~ ~ NOIL~f12i1SN00 M3N ~' Y ~ °a ?pJ~ ~ w qqi ~i~i ~~ d Z d 7 d I I B; ~ Yr=.~ ~di~ ~ 9 m.~ ~Sdg H~I1F+2I 11130 ~ ®` <~ B ~ ~~ dda -~ r ~~ ~ as ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ ~ '~~ >$ ~ ~; S~~ t ~~16F ~~gs a ~ t eB -_ _- -- 4 i " ~-- a ~ ~ file ~ -- ~ ~^ '~ ^ ~ ~ i ~ ; ; 0 -- -- B ~~ a ~I ~ ~~ - - -- -- ---- -- ~-- ~Ci~~ -- ~ i _ , .. ~ , ~ ~~ ,~ ~. ~ -, J wm+ i . (1 i ~ -~ g ~~ ,M~ i ~~ ~-- --- -- W ~ II i F p ~~ ~ fF g i ~i fi i i !$FB 9E ~i B i e„~~ ~A9 I. Q-- ~ S - ~ ~ -- ~--~, fie ~ ~ J 1~# F I~B / i 1 3 ! i -l E ~ p ~~ Ou-1 i ~_ _- ~ p ~ E _(~; _ ~- aye *9ea _- ~1 1 al8i ~~ ® ~ ~ i i ~ ~1 ii __ ~' 1 F O 6 I1 O 1 ~8 a it ~~~ a8 ~~ AB~~ ~~ ' ~ 1,1A ~~ fi Z~ ' `~ F~C~~z~iT E VJNOIYdJfYJ OH~NVN ~~ NOLL~f12i15N0~ M3N I I (~ ~ s vzvza ~~ ~ ~~~ ~Sdg H~I~IH2I ~~~¢ ~ dda ~ ~ W ~~ e~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ n d9NO WF/J(1J ~H7NHb LL7f1b15NOJ M3N ~ ~ m „ ~ ~ NO „ mx _ ~ n ^~ N a ~S~'g H.7 I1t~2I ~ ~ ~ s E~ ~"W gP ~ 4 4 4 8 ~ @'® ~ s = ~ ~. 1. I I '~ I ~e ~~ ~ ~ ~~ E B e ~ ? ? ! Cg o Y S ~ v ~ ~ W G I~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ KI ~ \\ ~ - x W Z K W H r (~ 2 W _ U ~l W U __ J W N 6 m i i i j I 4 ~~ i ,r=r= ®, a DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Donald Granger November 18, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00324 -DRS GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS - A request to construct a 13,855 square foot office and retail building on 1 70 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commeraal District, located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road - APN 1076-191-10 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2002-00337 Design Parameters• The protect site is located on the north side of Base Lme Road, east of Archibald Avenue, within an existing shopping center developed under Conditional Use Permit 84-13 The protect site originally was master-planned for a retail bwlding Hollywood Video is located on the adtacent parcel to west, and amulti-family protect is north of the protect site To the east is a mobile home park. A condition of approval for the shopping center (CUP 84-13) regwres that future buildings be consistent with the Mission architectural style The proposed office and retail building has been designed to incorporate elements of the Mission style and blend with adjacent building by matching the form, Spanish file roof, exposed rafter tails and columns of the adtacent Hollywood Video building A colonnade exists on the south elevation, and partial colonnade is located on the east elevation and wraps around to a portion of the north elevation The bulding includes recessed arches on the north and west elevations, and a curvilinear parapet on the south and east elevations provide variation to the roofline The proposed design also includes new elements such as stacked stone a tower with spandrel glass that will be backlit and acrescent-shaped outdoor plaza at the . southeast comer of the budding provides an attractive focal point Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect South and East Elevations -The slightly curving flat parapet elements, flanking the tower, appears too modem and out-of-synch with the overall character of the building There is no functional reason for this element as evidenced by the fact that spandrel glass was chosen for the upper half to hide the utility space between the ceding and the roof. Delete and replace with design consistent with matority of budding by extending tale roof colonnade Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The pavement in the plaza area near the tower should be decorative, with scored lines and colored concrete, complementing the tower feature Additional landscaping should be provided in the following areas Tree planting wells should be provided along the east elevation lust north of the plaza Along the north elevation, landscape planters should be added adtacent to the wall plane from the northwest corner of the building east to the two columns near the center of the • building „ ,, N 12 DRC COMMENTS DC2003-00324 -DRS GEORGE MAKKAR & AMIRA BOUTROS November 18, 2003 Page 2 The 2-foot high recessed band at top of the tower should be eliminated so that the exposed rafter tails are located at the roof/wall plane function, matching the roofline of the rest of the building and the adfacent Hollywood Video building Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion All signs shall conform to the existing Uniform Sign Program Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the protect and recommend review and approval by the Planning Commission subfect to the above recommendations Design Review Committee Action Members Present• Larry McNeil, Rich Fletcher and Brad Buller Staff Planner: Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the protect and recommend approval with the following conditions 1 The slightly curving flat parapet elements, flanking the tower, along the south and east elevations, shall be modified to be flat The spandrel glass feature shall remain The final design shall be subfect to City Planner review 2 The pavement in the plaza area near the tower shall be decorative, with scored lines and colored concrete The final design shall be subfect to staff review dunng plan check 3 Large size potted plants shall be installed along the north elevation 4 The tower element, with the 2-foot high recessed band at the top of the tower, shall remain as proposed Spandrel glass shall extend from the top of the tower to the concrete walkway along the south and east elevations .1 i~ N13 .~N ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL - ~ INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ~, orRaay,o Cucr (Please type or prim clearly using ink. Use the tab key ro move Iran one tlne ro the next Una.) Pkvuung Dlvidarr (atl9) 477+27aa The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review.the project pursuant to,City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines;'_the~~ California. Eriviron`mental ,Quality, Act; and tFie Citj?s; F2ulesr and _ Procedu~ s`tomplement CEQA,. Ifs important~tFiat the iriforrriatton requesterJ~in this aPPiicatio b ~prov'ideil~iriYfu7~x~~•~ ;" _ =;r= ~~''• ',,°'''''=``x~~ = ~ ... rt°~. _ __ " Project Title: RANCH BASE PLAZA Name & Address of project owner(s): B.M. BROS 714WEST FIRST STREET TUSTIN CALIFORNIA 92780 Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor: B.M BROS DR. AMIRA BOUTROS 714 WEST FIRST STREET TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780 Confect Person 8 Address: MICHAEL ICIROLLOS 283340 SYCAMORE DR. SANTA CLARITA, CA 91350 Name 8 Address of person preparing this /orm (d ddierent Irom above) Telephone Number. (661) 714 3891 EnvlronmenlallnloFOrml.doc Page 1 of 9 Created on 5/222002 4.09 PM INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWILLNOTBEPROCESSED. Please notethatltumeresponsronnyormeeppncamwo~~.~oero: the application k complete at the tlme of submdtal; ChY stall will not be evadable to per/orm work regwred to provide missln~ lnlormaNon. ~Q/~ J~~ Application Number tar the project to which thRs form peRa(ns: //~ ' `~ ~3 ~~ ~ `~ r •1) Provide a full scale (81/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the pro)ect site, and indicate the sNe boundaries. 2) Provide a set o/color photographs that show representative views rnto the sRe /rom the north, south, east and wash views info and figm the sde from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of signrfrcant lectures /r,~m the site. Include a map showing focafion of each photograph. 3) Profect Locagon (deSCdDe): NORTH EAST ARCHIBALD & BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addlNonal sheet 1/necessary): 1076-191-10-0-000 •5) Gross She Area (er/sq. ft.): 2.026 Ac / 88287 sa FT •6) Nei She Area (total site size minus area of public sheets B proposed dedications): 1.709 Ac / 74450.2 sa FT 7J Descdbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whkh would afteci the pro)ed site (attach ditlonal sh t Nnecessery): as >Jo~rc 8) Include a description of ell permds which will be necessary from the Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies In order to fully Implement the pro)ed: BUILDING PERMIT 9) Descnbe the physical setbng of the site as it exists before the project including in/ormagon on topography, soil slabllrty, plants and animals, mature trues, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of signr~cant lectures descnbed In addition, cite all sources of rnformabon (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheofogrca/ surveys, trelrc studies): , CURRENTLY THE SITE IS A VACANT PAD COVERED WITH GREEN LAWN EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONSISTS OF A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING TYPE OF TREES. .JACARANDA, NEPAL PRIVET, CANARY ISLAND PINE, LONDON PLANE TREE, AUSTRALIAN ~/~/ILLOW. Fmmm~montallnlnF~rtn1 doC Paae 2 of 9 r r ~'~ Created on 522!2002 4.09 PM Inlormafion Jndlcated by an astensk (•) !s not required o1 nonconshuction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stet/. THE SITE IS SURROUNDED •T• OLLOWING: EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE MOBILE HOME PARK ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE • A COMMERCIAL STORE ~ HOLLYWOOD VIDEO" WITH 5' OFFSET ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE BASE LINE RD. ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. EXISTING ASPHALT PAVED PARKING SPACES SURROUND THE SITE FROM NORTH SOUTH AND EAST. WITH EXISTING 25'-O" TO Z6'-O" WIDE RIVE WAYS. fo) Descnbe are loioN+r cuaurei arrd/wmstodcal aspects ofare ana. Cite au sources alnforrrraaon (books, puWlshed reports and orel hkrory): NEITHER CULTURAL NOR HISTORICAL ASPECTS EXSIT ON THE SITE. 11) Describe any noise sources end fhe/r levels aret pg~v elled Me alts (akcraR, roedwey ndse, eta) end how grey w!A ea'ecf proposed uses: ONLY ROADWAY NOISE FROM BASE LINE RD. MAY EXSIT. THIS LEVEL OF NOISE WILL NOT AFFECT THE PROPOSED USES OF THE NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. 12) Describe fns proposed pro/eet In detaA. This should provrde an e e descr! the alts Mterms o/ uaimete use that wN/ result from fns proposed prgect Indicate N there a pha /or evelopmerrf, fns extend o/ devebpmerrt ro occur wdh each phew, and are antlcipet aon of each krcreme t. Attach addlaonal meet(s) Hneoessery.' THE GROSS ARE OF THE NEW BUILDING WILL B ~.~ ~,~_~ ~, 6511 SO FT WILL BE USED AS A VETERINARY IjIOSPITAL. 1615 SO FT WILL BE USED FOR FOOD SERVICE 6034 SO FT WILL BE USED AS GENERAL RETAIL A 1400 SO FT EXTERIOR PLAZA WILL BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING 4 WASHINGTON PALMS AND WOODEN PERGOLA WILL ADD MORE SHADE TO THIS PLAZA A CONTINUOUS COLONNADE WILL EXTEND ALONG_ I(JJjH THE SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS. ErMronmenlallnfoFortnl doc pig 9 ~ g IAII \IW_ ~te~ an yZypppp Ob9 PM • ~~ 13) Desgibe the surrounding properties, lnduding In/ormation on plants and animals and any adtural, historical, or spank espeda. Irxlrcare the pye ollend use (resrdenbal, commercJel, etc ), Inrenstiy M land use (ov~e-fem6y, aparLnerd houses, shops, depeRmeM stores, etc.) and stele o1 development (height fronrepe, setback rear yard. eta.): EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX ALONG THE NORTH LINE, MOBILE HOME PARK ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AND A COMMERCIAL STORE ~~ HOLLYWOOD VIDEO~~ WITHJ~ OFFSET ALONG THE WEST PROP. LINE THE PNV OF BASELINE RD IS THE SOUTH PL.THE SETBACKS ARE N (HH~-5~~). E ~96~-4~~) S (JF)~-4~~) AND E ~ 5~-O~~)- HIGHT IS Z7~B" AND HEIGHT IS Z7~-B~~ AND FRONTAGE IS 'I5Z~-O" 1Q Wtp the prgoosed prcfed tdienge the petlem, scale or Grerader of the surrounding general area o1 the pr%ct7 No 15) Indicate the type d alrorf-term and longterm rrolse ro 6e generated, ~Ing spume end emamt hbw w~ these noise levels eflecf adjaoerd propeRres and on-efts uses. Whar meUads asaardpooRng ere praposad7 THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL AND LIGHT RETAIL STORES WILL NOT GENERATE SHORT OR LONG TERM NOISE ON SPECIAL OCCASIONS, SMALL TRUCK DELIVERIES MAY TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 9 00 AM AND 4 00 PM ~~'~7(irliLr /~/S ii CY~C/if ~r~1/G7~a7L •16) Irdlcare proposed removals endror replacements olmebue orscenk bees NONE 17) Indroere any bodies d water (Including domestic water supp/Jea) into whkh the s1re drains: THERE IS AN EXSITING BARRIEL CULVERT AT THE S/E CORNER OF THE PROPERTY EmlrormerdallntoFO/m1.dx Pepe 4 of B Croaud on Sr22/10021:08 PM N ~`~ 18) Indkate expected amount ~t• ga. (See Ataachmerd A for usage e • )~ further darificetton, please tooted the Cucamonga County Water Dlsbxd et 887-2591. a. Resldenttal (gal/day) 0.00 Peak use (geunay) 0, 00 D. Commenxal/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 1.500,00 Peak use (galhnlNae) 3 000,00 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal. ^ septic rank ®sewer. H septik tanks ere proposed, attach percdafion tests. H discharge to a santtary sewage system Is proposed Indlca0a expelled dally sewage generation. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further dadfication, please tooted the Cucamonga County Water Dlsbkx at 987-2591. a. Resldentlal (gavdey) N/A 1.000,00 b. CovmrerdaYlndusMal(geYdaY~cl Number d resldenttel tmtts: Q@(g~ (Indicate renge of parcel sizes, rrdnlmum k# size and merdmum k# size: e~~gQ (indk~ whether uMts ere rental a /or sale units): 21) Antklpated renge of sale sale Prloe(s) S Rerd (permonlh) S ~ SpecNy number N bedrooms by unit 1, 23) Indicate antkipated household size by untt type: FsWronmenlallnfoForml.doc N~~ Pape 5 of 9 Created on 5f27/20021:u8 PM •~ ~~ a the expected number o/school ch8dran who wdl be res~dmg withk+ th pro/ect Goofed Me aPWoP~~ Districts es shown in ACechment B: a. ~7e¢+erdarY• b. Junkx High: a Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type oI use(s) and mayor /unc8on(a) o/ commercial, Jndusbiel or lnstifu8onal uses: VETERINARY HOSPITAL, PROFESSIONAL OR RETAIL SPACE, SEPITING RESTAURANT ~ PIZZA AND FASTFOOD 26) Tatel floor area d carunerclel, IndusMal, a instllutbnal uses by type: VET HOSPITAL 6511 SO FT RESTAURANT Ss FASTFOOD .1615 SO FT PROFESSIONAL OR RETAIL . 6034 SO FT 27) lndicatehoursofapere8on: 6 OO AM TO 11'00 PM 28) Number d empbyees: TataF i_, ZC ~° I 8-S M - sr'+T Maximum Shllt _ lime o/Maximum Shpt ~ 'S M-SPrT' __ 29) Plourde breakdown o/anfrdpeted)ob dassificafkxrs, krduding wage and salary renges, as we9 es en Jndlcatlon d the rate d hire for each dasslficadon (attach additranal aheet d necessary): 30) EsBmation o/ the number of workers to be hired that currently reskle In the 10 TO 16 '31) For commemJa/ and IndusMal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o/ air polu8on endssrons. (Date should be verified thrtwgh the South Coast Arr Quality Management Dlsfrk4 at (818) 572-8283): FsvlronrnenmllnfoFoimt dot Page 8 of 9 CreeOed on 527/2002 4:09 PM • ALL PROJECTS ~~ 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, end flood contrd agencies serving the project been contacted to detemUne their abHlty ro provrde adequafe seance to the Proposed pm/ect9 hso, please Mdreete their rosponse. ADEQUATE SERVICE CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE PROPOSED SUBJECT 33) In the Mwwn history o/ flrls property, has there been any use. storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxk meterials7 Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not lindted ro PCBS; radloecflve substances; pestkrdes and herbicides. fuels, offs, sal~rents, end other flammable Ipuids and gases. Also note underground atorags of any of the above. Please list the materiels end describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as wet es the dates of use, dlarOwn.' THIS PROPERTY HAS NEVER BEEN USED FOR STORAGE OR DISCHARGE OF HAZARDOUS AND / OR TOXIX MATERIALS. 34) W1fl the proposed Project Involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hamrdous and/or oxic materiels, Inducting but act limited ro those examples listed abova9 Ryas, provide an Inventory of all such matedals ro ba used and proposed method W disposal. The loceflon o/such uses, abng wdh the storage and ahlpmerd arses, shefl be shown end labeled an the appllcetlon plans. THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT BE INVOLVED IN A TEMPORARY OR LONG-TERM USE FOR STORAGE OR DISCHARG OF HAZARDOUS AND 7 OR TOXIX MATERIAL I hereby cartlly that the statements fumisired above end In the adadred exhibits present the date and lnlormation required to- adequate eva/uaflon of this project ro the bast ofmy ability, that the /acts, statements, and Jnfanneflan presented are true end correct tot he best o1 my lowwledge and belief. I lurtlrer understand that addrlionel Inromraflon may be required ro ~ su6M~ before en adequate eva/uaflon can be made by the City of Random Cucamonga I \t1~` 1\I Date: 04/07/03 SlgnetUle:) MICHAEL KIROLLOS ~: PROJECT MANAGER r-~ 'u Emnronmental InfoForrn 1.doc ~12~ Page 7 of B Creates «, 5!222002 409 PM ~~{ 19: N~ i i DRC2003-00324 LOCATION MAP ~~ 0 480 960 1440 1920 2400 2880 N • JTERIOR EY ~wnnnll 11 ,I:/C. .IL.. :,r:.~f~ • :; €~_ ~~ ~~~I ~Gi/T ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNI ARTMENT OF WATER RES( 2452 11 NE ~q5 X46 35 X47 I R 7 W. (C UCAMONGA PEA 0 0' ~ _ Cucamon¢e pp 7 ~ _ ' IIII ~ ~~ ; ROAD CLASSIFICATION ~JI~_ ,~ _ Heavy-duH--- Ught~duty----- ~~~ / v:r = „oo ~ •, Medwmduty_ _ Ummproveddlrt=...._... _ 1 ~ EKA .z •• sr T U S Route ~ State Route ~ ~ II :::-_ _ :_ ::: •• ~ Interstate Route Q ~r I~ n ~, "-~~°,4 FEEDER\-_ \®Re~ il~~ II .U `T~ _ II n ~~ °~~ '~• __~~ GUASTI, CALIF ~ I~ ~~~~ • J~ ~~ A 1~~090 SE/4 ONTARIO IS OUADRANC LE II _ j ~OJ ~ko I~ '' ~~ N3400-W31730/7 5 --~ ~~~ ~- 1 ~` ~ ~ ^~ G >~ II °_ ~_~~ t _ '~ ~_(i ^~ ~ ~ 1966 _ I~ I ~--~f;i, I ~ - 5T 1- i^ / I' PHOTOPEVISED 1881 --grN=-__-=====ir _ If 11 Well ='sr°°\-'- -L Ji c• 15 DMA 2452 II SE-SERIES VB95 II II • II ~I II ~ ` r oo= j „ o ii .o ~`' ~. -~ ~ II n ii 0 Tr r 'I '; ~ IJ~i050 e ~ ~ f I -~I IO50 II Park ' W ~ -'~ ___ ~ I it _~ % H ~ ¢ , Q •~i - ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~Y k ~~ ___ ~ ~ ~ AN ~~~ R ROINO i ~~ i A VE -i- - RANCHO ~ a'ker ~~=Well ~!. ° 6NfAHT(1'_ - 's ~:..=.a I ~ c ==cc_== ~J ~I ~ ~~i_ ' n ~`~, ~^/~~ (' ''`-A- ~`-'_1116 ='~ \-_-. ' /I~'` 010 _"~_ _4\, ~11I _ e F--==t ~, ~ %~'~-OP~~fQR10 MOTjJ)~`;~k~EDWAv ;', - - ~. L,ppl~Czr1C~ NOgT!\ Y -azas..,._._ r .. o' y ' - - ... -_ Nair. wooo~ LADED ~ BUIDING~ PIC H 1 OF 4 N2~ v BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2003-00324 2. Related Files. Preliminary Review DRC2002-00337 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00324 - DRs GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS - A request to construct a 13,855 square foot office and retail bwlding on 1 70 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commeraal District, located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road - APN 1076-191-10 Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2002-00337 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Drs George Makkar and Amira Boutros 741 West First Street Tustin, CA 92780 5. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial 8. Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The applicant is proposmg a 13,855 square foot office and retail building on a previously graded pad that is located within an existing shopping center The shopping center was originally approved as Conditional Use Permit 84-13, and was master- planned to have a office/retail bwlding at the this location The 1 70 acre protect site is located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road On the adtacent parcel to the west is a Hollywood Video store, and further west is a gas station and mini- market To the north is amulti-family residential protect, and northwest of the protect site is a fast-food use and a commercial strip center To the east is a mobile home park, and to the south, across Base Line Road, is a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a grocery store. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g , permits, fmancmg approval, or partiapation agreement). None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model i.~ 2~ • Irntial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 (/) Aesthetics ()Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services () Utilities/Service Systems /) Agricultural Resources /) Cultural Resources /) Hydrology/W ater Quality Energy and Mineral Resources /) Noise Recreation /) Mandatory Findings of (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Sods ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a sigmficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "potentially significant impact° or °potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigatiopn ,measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared By ^~°"~~'" Date S Reviewed By Date Z () I find that although the proposed protect could have a sigmficant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or ~~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 La55 man Sipnihcant lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources POlenhally SiBnd¢ant w~~n Mmpaaon man Spmfcent NO Im act Into rated I atl I acl EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no signficant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a state scenic highway There are no state scenic highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The 1 70 acre protect site is located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road, and is characterized by commercial development to the west, south, and northwest To the north is a multi-family residential protect, and to the east is a mobile home park The protect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for aoffice/retail building (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans, which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The Impact is not considered significant AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract ~~ N2~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Lase than SI9a~fcent Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources sonncem M pznon sum ~~ Na I an Ir,co oretatl ~ an I act c) Involve other changes in the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result m conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The 1 70 acre prolect site is located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road, and is characterized by commercial development to the west, south, and northwest To the north is amulti-family residential prolect, and to the east is a mobile home park The prolect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for aoffice/retail bulding (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) There are approximately 1,300 acres of prime farmlands, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The 1 70 acre prolect site is located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road, and is characterized by commercial development to the west, south, and northwest To the north is amulti-family residential prolect, and to the east is a mobile home park The prolect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for aoffice/retail building (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) The nearest agricultural use is approximately 1 42 miles south of from the prolect site, therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the prolect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan b) Violate any au quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the prolect region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () Q concentrations N 2`} Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less 7Ten Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aolensally Sigmhcent wnn Miogafion rnan Significant No 1 ed Inco ratetl I en I act e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the prolect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) on aprolect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the prolect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD, as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. N2~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Lau Than Sipnificani Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sipmhcant WM Mnipauon Tllan Spnificant No I ecl Into ratetl I aq I ad • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWoCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, In accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. ~~ 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceeding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,o would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. N2°~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Then Signbcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pdennally Sgmla ant wan Mifigauon man Spnificant No I en Inco rated I act I eq 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prolect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, prolects have the potential to create significant impacts ii they are located within 1/4-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, prolects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCACMD Rufe 1401 The prolect site is located within 1/4-mile of a sensitive receptor, apartments to the north and mobile homes to the east Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Satety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the proposed prolect, consisting of professional offices and small-scale leasable suites less than 1,500 square feet for retail use, do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service N~ i Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than S,pnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pctanaaliy Signihcam wan Mmpavon man Sipmbcem No Im act Inco oratatl I an I act c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict With any local policies or ordinances protecting ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance Conflict with the provisions Conservation Plan, Natural Plan, or other approved local, conservation plan of an adopted Habitat ( ) Community conservation regional, or state habitat Comments: (/) (/) a) The prolect site is located in area developed with commercial, multi-family residential, and a mobile home park The site is located on a building pad that was previously graded and planted with grass as part of a master plan and conditional use permit that was approved in 1964 According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are numerous heritage trees or mature trees on the prolect site These are located along the property lines and are proposed to be preserved in place by the prolect design, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ O O U (/) N31 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Lese Then Significant Lev Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgn icanlt Mi ga4on Sim ant No Irtpact Inca orataC 1 act I act b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/ ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemetenes~ Comments: a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has been previously rough graded The prolect site is part of master plan that was approved in 1984 and planned for a future retail/office building There will be no impact c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has been previously rough graded The prolect site is part of master plan that was approved in 1984 and planned for a future retail/office building No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has been previously rough graded The prolect site is part of master plan that was approved in 1984 and planned for a future retail/office building No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) nQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) hquefactioM ~~ M Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sgnficant Lev Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fnan"ally Sgmhtant wan Mingahon Than S,gnifcent No I an Inco rated I en I ecl iv) Landslides () ( ) () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () ( ) () (/) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () ( ) () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () ( ) () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () ( ) () (/) of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, axording to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The protect site is located within the buried/uncertain segment of the Red Hill Fautt This segment connects the Red Hill Fault with the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp According to the General Plan, subsurface explorations for the fault found no evidence of its existence, therefore, special studies are only required for critical facilities Office and retail buildings do not meet the definition of a critical facility The Red Hill Fault passes within 25 miles southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 1 miles north of the protect site These faults are both capable of producing M„ 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes is 8 0 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 10 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unform Building Code wail ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant b) The site is located on a building pad that was previously graded and planted with grass as part of a master plan and conditional use permit that was approved in 1984 The parking lot was also paved, therefore, no impacts are anticipated c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sand Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sand Loam Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils typically have gentle slopes, ranging from zero to 2 percent No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed ~~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 less Then Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potent,ally SiBndicanl wnn MiLgaaon man Signditant No I act Inco oraletl Im acl I d 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (/) (/) (/) (/) e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than that of any others in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than signdicant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any others in the state The N ~-1 C~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Srpmhcent lass Issues and Supportin Information Sources Potanirally WrVt Than g Srgnrlrcant Mrtrpa4on SrpnrirceM No Irtpact Inco oratetl 1 aq I ael City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools existing or proposed located within a 1/4-mile of the prolect site The protect site is located approximately 38 miles east of the nearest existing school, which is Alta Loma Elementary Typically, the proposed uses, office and retail, do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 3 25 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirementsv b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or oft-site ~~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Then 9pmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signd¢ant With Mmgetion Then Significant No I an Into oratee I an I act d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete, lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows \_J N~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Lass Than frgni(cem less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant WM Mmganon Than Significant No I act Into rate0 I act 1 acl The proposed protect site is a previously graded building pad, and on-site storm drain faculties (undersidewalk drains, cross-gutters, curb and gutter, etc) have been installed and have sufficient capacity to direct stormwater flows into existing storm drain facilities The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signdicant. d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows- A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated , e) The protect will cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bulding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is not more than 5 acres, therefore, the site is not required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution No impacts are anticipated g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains, whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance with the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City I v J~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Lass man Sipmhcanl Leas Issues and Su ortm InformaLon Sources PP g Palamiany s~pn~nwm wro, MM1ipanon man si9nificani No Impael Inco raletl I acl I act 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically diwde an established community O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The 1 70 acre prolect site is located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road, and is characterized by commercial development to the west, south, and northwest To the north is amulti-family residential prolect, and to the east is a mobile home park The prolect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for an office/retail building (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) This prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding commercial development to the north and west The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is Neighborhood Commercial The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3 and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1 as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact N34~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less men Spndcent Lass Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Spnihcanl wpm MiOgation man Sgnificant No I atl Inco oratetl Im act I eh 11. NOISE. Would the protect result to a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () ( ) (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments. a) The protect•site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Within 171 feet of Base Line Road, noise levels exceed 65dBA The City's Development Code requires that all commercial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impacts to the proposed use or employees is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards There are residences adtoining the protect site's north and east property lines The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shalt not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or ha Ited. , ` Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Lau Then Signdicenl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g ae+eneellr Sigmhcent wnn Mnigaeon Then Sigmfcent No I eh nco ofated I C I ad The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be regwred 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The proposed protect, consisting of office and retail uses, normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels m Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See response a) above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The proposed protect is located approximately 3 25 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the tlight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: i a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated V ~IV Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Lass roan Sipnlfitant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pq~an~~my wan man Sigmhcant Mmgaoon Sigrnficant No I ad Inco atetl I act 1 xi b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No demolition of existing residential structures will occur No adverse impact expected. c) The protect site ~s vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wdh the provision of new or physically altered governmental tacilihes, need for new or physically altered governmental faalrtres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other per/ormance ob/echves /or any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schoois~ () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments• a) The protect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for a office/retail bwlding (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) The site, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Archibald Avenue, would be served by the existing Amethyst Fire Station located approximately 1 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not requre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase m property to be patrolled, as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The prolect will be regwred to pay school fees as prescribed by state law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest parks, Lions Park and Hermosa Park, are located less than 1 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline In the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public faalities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new tacilities Cumulatwe Nyl Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less man Sipmficant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g a°'e""°"Y $ipruficanl "`"" Miogaaon man $ipnifitent N° I an Inca rated I ael 1 atl development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect is located 15 miles from the existing City Library on Archibald Avenue, lust south of Base Line Road. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build- out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational faalities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest parks, Lions Park and Hermosa Park, are located less than 1 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities The protect site is part of master-planned shopping center that was planned for an office/retail building (Conditional Use Permit 84-13) A standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See response a) above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks LJ Nye Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less men Spniheant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Foleneally Signibcam w,m Mmpanan Tnan Spnificant No I acl Inco oreteE I act I acl d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections All street frontage improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) have been completed In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate approximately 235 two-way peak hour trips (Rancho Cucamonga Trip Generation Methodology) for all land uses proposed within the protect (office, medical, retail, and fast-food without drive-thru) Since the maximum two-way peak hour trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for a combination office/retail land use, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with alt street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 25 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is developed Ail street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) have been installed along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will therefore not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access The Fire District has reviewed and approved the Fire Access Plan of the proposed protect No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated N~3 Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Then Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanaally S,grvhcant w,ln Miopahon Then Sigrvfcani No I an Into rateE 1 ael I act g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () ( ) () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () ( ) () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () ( ) () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity () () () (/) to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant Nab Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Then Spndsent Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources Potentially wnn rnar, g $ignihCant Mitigation Significant No I ap Inco rateE 1 act I ecl d) The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent The proposed protect would include the construction/operation of 1 office/retail building totaling 13,855 square feet, and is estimated to employ less than 60 people for all proposed uses Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221, and therefore would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CCW D has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilities Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the Ceneral Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) -1~ Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Tnen Spndsent Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially sigmfi[ant won Mnipaeon roan SiOnificaM No I act Inco rated 1 ep I c) Does the protect have environmental effects, which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, edher directly or indvectly~ Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more etects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaraticn per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) tL J (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Nye u Initial Study for Development Review DRC2003-00324 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signs a envi•onmental effects would occur. Signature Date c7~~0 - ZLt] ? _ Print Name and Title ~j~a~~ ~ro/jOS Ny~- City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Revew DRC2003-00324 Public Review Period Closes: January 14, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Dr's George Makkar and Amva Boutros Project Location (also see attached map): Located approximately 300 feet east of Archibald Avenue, on the north side of Base Line Road - APN• 1076-191-10 Project Description: A request to construct a 13,855 square foot office and retail bwlding on 1 70 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. . January 14, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By Nye RESOLUTION NO 0413 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-00324 TO CONSTRUCT A 13,855 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND RETAIL BUILDING ON 1 70 ACRES OF LAND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATEDAPPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1076-191-10 A. Rentals 1 Drs George Makkar and Amira Boutros filed an application for Development Review DRC2003-00324 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as '4he application " 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterrnined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, mcludmg wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows. a The application applies to property located within an ewsting shopping centeron the north side of Base Lme Road, approximately 300 feet north of Archibald Avenue, vnth a street frontage of approximately 230 feet on Base Lme Road and a lot depth of approxfmatey275 feet, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is developed with apartments, the property to the south is developed with a shopping center, the property to the east is developed with a mobile home park, and the property to the west is developed with a retail bwlding, and c The proposed use, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally m~unous to properties or improvements m the vianity, and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on November24, 2003, to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback, however, no residents attended, and e The protect design meets or exceeds the Basic Development Standards for technical regwrements, mcludmg, but not limited to, parking stalls and setbacks, and N ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0413 DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 2 f The project site was onginally master planned for a retail building underConditional Use Permit 84-13, and g The application contemplates the operation of vetennanan and retail uses, both permitted uses within the Neighborhood Commeroial Distnct, and h The architectural design of the proposed protect, with a colonnade, exposed rafter tads, Spanish the roof, and similar form and massing, is compatible with the adtacent buldng, will provide design contmwty, and make a positive statement along Base Line Road, a design goal of the General Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows. a That the proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and • c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d That the proposed design, together moth the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the wunity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wilt have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon N~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-13 DRC2003-00324 -DRS GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 3 which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) All signs shall comply with the existing Umfortn Sign Program (USP #30) and shall require separate review and approval. 2) There shall be a minimum of one tree per 30 linear feet of building wall and 30 percent of all trees shall be 24-inch box size or larger. 3) The slightly curving flat parapet elements, flanking the tower, along the south and east elevations, shall be modified to be Flat The spandrel glass feature shall remain Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review dunng plan check 4) The pavement in the plaza area near the tower shall be decorative, wilh scored lines and colored concrete. The final design shall be subtect to Planning Division review dunng plan check. 5) Large size potted plants shall be installed along the north elevation. Landscape plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the potted plants 6) At the tower feature, spandrel glass shall extend from the top of the tower to the concrete walkway along the south and east elevations. 7) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real, or native fieldstone Other fortes of stone may be manufactured products 8) A raised concrete walk shall be installed adjacent to parking stall No. 57, and a landscape planter shall be installed adtacent to space No 1 Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the walk and landscape planter Engineennq Division 1) Install one streetlight, 16,000 Lumens, HPSV and one "R26S" street sign, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Revise existing street improvement plans, City Drawing No 835 Sheets 1 and 2, as required by the City Engineer b) Secunty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing ~JS~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-13 DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 . Page 4 completion of the street improvements, pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits c) Pnor to any work being performed in the street nght-of--way, fees shall be paid and a construction pernit shall be obtained from the City Engineers office m addition to any permits required 2) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan. 3) Pnor to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City. Forth CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect. Environmental Mitigation Arr Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Pnor to issuance of any grading perits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• N52 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0413 DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 5 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time ofyearof construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e., Hnnd speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated v~nth water of other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall tie applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactwe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercal facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools N53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0413 DRC2003-00324 -DRS GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 6 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather stnpping. Hydrology 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, pre-cast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weeky noise level monitonng as speGfied in Development Code Section 17 02 120. Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Plamm~g Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) Haul truck delwenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 datly tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N~-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0413 DRC2003-00324 -DRS. GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS January 14, 2004 Page 7 BY. Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-Hnt. AYES COMMISSIONERS• NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS I'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00324 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of Approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Development Review DRC2003-00324 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City's staff is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits N 5~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00324 Applicant: _Drs. George Makkar and Amira Boutros Initial Study Prepared by: _Donald Granger Date: _ Mav 12, 2003 .. • _ ' -• • .. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational y4 emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speatications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C p shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be uttlized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern Cahforma Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C throw h seedin and watenn Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Z s ' °~i ~ ~ -. . .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work enods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Rewew of Plans A q accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public Rewew of Plans A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds CE C Rewew of Plans A 4 (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 re wrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Rewew of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Rewew of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools 2 of 4 Z -• .. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Hydrology and Water Quality x=- ~,~,;.~. `. ~~; _sr,-e<"a''~ ~ ~'' d EN~I ~~~ ~ ~_~ , ~? Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/t:./D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, dnrersions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Noise . ,'" ~~ ~ '~ .,b .,~ .3 ~, .. ~,- ,~ ~ ~, ~~„ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C Dunng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Dmsion If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 30~ .. ~ ~ -. ~. . . .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency ws~«~° Method of VerHicatiort;~e;;~;~~~~ ~ ~ Sanctions , CDD -Community Development Director or A -With Each New A - On-site Inspection , , 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final designee Development Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Budding Ottiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies 4 -Stop Work Order / Plans) PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 4 of 4 •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00324 SUBJECT: OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING APPLICANT: DRS GEORGE MAKKAR AND AMIRA BOUTROS LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD EASTOF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A G l R i t Completion Date ~ . enera equ remen s 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ~~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-13, Standard ~_J_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenVDesign Review approval shall expve if ~___/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Droision, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/___/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner sc-io-o3 t N~'~ Protect No DRC2003-00324 Completion Date D. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~~_ State Flre Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division • to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~_ submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldtng, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 8 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans In effect at the time of bwldtng permit Issuance. 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the Issuance of bwldtng permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permlts. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be Identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~ including proper illumination. 11 Atl parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Clty Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits. Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, ~~ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permlts. 2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City ~~_ Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) _/~_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not regwre the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_/_ d Roil-up doors T h b th t - ht d l d _/~_ ~~ ras ins wi coun er weig e i s e SC-10-03 2 ~ W~ Protect No DRC2003-00324 f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed t h dd f b i en rom view o e 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 during the hours of 7 a m until 10 p.m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, bwlding materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 6 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 7 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall Include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 8 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed Into the bwlding faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Clty Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally Integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included In bwlding plans. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12•inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards SC-10-03 3 Nay Completion Date ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~-/_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ -/~/ ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~_/_ ~~. Protect No DRC2003-00324 Completion Date G. H. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more ~~_ parktng stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~~_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parktng spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parktng area Ii covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/___/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within ~~ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4 Within parkmg lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking ~_J_ stalls. 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/___/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent vrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multifamily residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/~_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage SC-10-03 4 ~ W Proled No DRC2003-00324 Comoleuon Date 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 1. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Anysigns proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Diwslon prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, . d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~~- _/_/ SC-10-03 5 N~ Protect No DRC2003-00324 Comoletion Dete Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Division Project Number (i e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sobs report. ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet° signature are requred prior to plan check submittal 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverageto ~~_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ~~_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~_ Building and Safety Division M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction Atl plans shall be ~~ marked with the prolect file number (i e , DRC2003-00324) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabdityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development prolect or ~~_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6'30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~J_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Bulding Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/~_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 6 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 ~~_ 7 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed ~~~ SC-10.03 6 N) Prgect No DRC2003-00324 Completion Date ~O. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permts. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for existing buldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy pnor to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwldmg permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Uttlity Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects SC-10-03 7 ~~~ ~~ ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~_ ~~ ~~ ~~- ~_~- ~_~. Project No DRC2003-00324 Comoletion Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map wdl be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them . S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~_/ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. ~~ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All bwldmgs shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, wRh ~~_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be mvandal-resistant fixtures -J-J- U. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wdhm ~~_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2. All roof openings giwng access to the bwldrng shall be secured with edher iron bars, metal gates, ~~ or alarmed V. Windows 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic ~~_ 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede ~~ entry to burglars W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~~ wsibihty. 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be ~~_ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. X. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 ~~~ SC-10-03 8 I `4~ 1 Protect No ORC2003-00324 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-,0.03 9 N`~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: PRJ2003-00113 PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS. FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION• FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED. LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: PLANNER: DRC2003-00324 Ranch Plaza rll 14 Tlm Feleran, Fire Inspector Donald Granger „„y,~,~,~,~,~,~,~ „~~ ~~ „„~: ~~~ ,~~,~,~,~ FIRE DISTRICT USE ONLY „„~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,~,w,~,~,~,~,~~,~,~,~,~,~, ,~~ *,~ f Outstand~ina,F~iPe'District Issues Status-"Cleared" when required information is entered below i Protect application complete - - - i ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - General, Procedural, Technical, or Operational Information that shall be Included, Corrected, or Completed as noted below. The following is applicable to the above project. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Pnvate Water Supply General Guidance for Fire Hydrants The following provides general guidance for the spaang and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants mcommercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and mdustnal parks ~J 13320 square feet 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Dvision to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any bulding Contact the Fve Safe Dvision 909 477-2770 2 Mm~mum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers. The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mams: Existing fue hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance. When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bwldmg, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution regwrements Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 FSC3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet Contact the Fire Safety Dvision (909) 477-2770 FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum speaficahons for private fire disVict access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c The outside turn radws shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs ~s 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches N'tZ f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffc lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnwng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 3 Fire Lane Identification• All requred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits-Technical Comments The below indicated permit regwrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or bwlding construction As noted below Speaal Permits maybe required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information Note• Carefully review the items below There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italiazed text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract amendment 1 General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Drnsion will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" fonn along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Retlectrve Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 s l~~~ 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bulder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit. Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Sprinkler Momtonng The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immedrately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers m Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupances Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Droision for specific details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 7 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8 Address- Other Than Single-family New buldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 9 Multi-unit Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwiding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings The Fire Distract shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 10 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property Contact Frre Safety Division (909) 477-2770 Fire Distract Forms and Letters Note: If these conditions are part of the final Standard Conditions Issued by the Planning Division referenced Fire Distract forms and letters are not included Contact the Fire Safety Division for copies of forms or letters The forms and letter are also found in previously issued Fire Distract comments. rare uistnct Itewew Letter (t'&E)- Template SL 10/31/02 Revision N~'~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00782-HKCONSTRUCTION-Arequest to construct a 5,928 square foot single-family home on .55 acre of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) located on Lot 8 of Tract 12650-1 at the westerly terminus of Deer Canyon Drive - APN: 1074-331-10. ANALYSIS: A. Applicable Regulations. The proiect will result in a 7- to 8-foot cut to accommodate a lower level garage, utility room, and laundry room. For a cut and/or fill equal to or exceeding 5 feet in vertical height, Planning Commission review and approval is required according to the Hillside Development Ordinance (Section 17.24 020 B 2 and 3 of the Development Code). B. Proiect Site: The protect site is a custom lot within Deer Creek, a subdivision at the northeast comer of Haven and Wilson Avenues. The site is located at the west end of Deer Canyon Drive in a cul-de-sac at the northwest end of the subdivision (see Exhibit "A"). The lot is rectangular in shape and slopes southeasterly at approximately 11 percent A 15-foot private equestrian easement exists along the front of the property. C. Proposed Proiect: The applicant isproposing tobuild atwo-story, single-family home within the City's Hillside Overlay District. The home is essentially designed as a one-story structure with a 4,575 square foot main level and 1,353 square foot lower level that includes an 824 square foot garage and 529 square foot basement area (utility and laundry rooms). The total lot coverage of the proiect is 24 percent, which includes eaves and patio/decks. The applicant is proposing to exceed 5 feet of vertical cut to accommodate the lower level of the proposed home. The lower level is designed to "tuck under" the rest of the home to reduce the visual impact of the structure, and though the "tuck under" garage does not entirely limit grading, it does give the appearance from the exterior of the home that grading has been reduced, which are both required by the Citys Hillside Ordinance. As a result of its design, the home falls well below the 30-foot maximum height allowed in the district as measured from finish grade, and therefore would be appropriate for the hillside development. D. Grading Committee. On November 18, 2003, the Grading Committee reviewed the project and approved the grading concept; however, recommended it not be approved until the driveway was redesigned to keep the retaining wall out of the equestrian trail easement. The Committee also asked that the applicant show the existing driveway apron. On December 2, 2003, the Committee reviewed the protect again and did not recommend approval because the applicant did not fully address the ITEM "0" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00782 - H.K. CONSTRUCTION • January 14, 2004 Page 2 previous Grading Committee comments from the November meeting On December 16, 2003, the Committee reviewed the protect for the third time and recommended it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval based on the new redesign of the driveway. E. Desion Review Committee• On November 18, 2003, the Committee (Fletcher, McNiel, Buller) reviewed the protect and recommended that project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subject to staff comments (Exhibit "G"). F. Technical Review Committee: On November 18, 2003, the Committee reviewed the protect and determined that it would have to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval because it exceeds 5 vertical feet of cut. The protect is consistent with all other applicable standards and polices in the Development Code. The Committee recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. G Environmental Assessment: The protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2003-00782 through the adoption of the attached draft Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, rad B er City Planner BB:W M:mlg Attachments• Exhibit °A° Exhibit °B° Exhibit 'C° Exhibit °D° Exhibit °E° Exhibit 'F° Exhibit °G° Draft Resol - Location Map and Site Plan - Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections - Elevations - Building Sections - Floor Plans - Roof Plan - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated November 18, 2003 ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00782 r.., f a w DRC2003-00782 ~' n-n-~ rn ~ 0 480 960 Feet Location Map A 0 N a w ,~ ~; ~~ ~~ _~__ ,; .•~ , __ ~.~ %4E-I6E (Ga6) ELLI6 Y~'SYWIO NYS ~ '°~""'~"O1 93Lf15 '3AY 1~YtlY111~ M3I105 LEV 3~N30153tl SUMO zat NYId 3115 '~NI `JNRi33NIJN3 NVANfIa , ~_\ ~ \ ` \ ~ ~/(E~ y~y No F ~`J ~~ ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~, o ~~ ,, .~ .~ .. ... _ ._ ~_ ~~~ _o N~yll O b pq tl pP ~ y Y Q "~~ ~ ~ t/ i~~ 9~'`1 M i t i 8 - - ~~ ~ y %YE-%E(508) ELLT6 YO'SYWIO NYS n n~ ~ .,.~~ ~° b O 9 ]11115 3AY 1JYtlY1Y0 H1005 LEY 39N301S3tl SUYO ~~yd ~ ~ a ' 2~Lp0-f00YJY0 '~NI JNItl33NIJN3 NVANf121 ""'"'N10""° ~ ,,,,~,,,,,s ~ a d d I! S n~~ $ ~ 4 d a Ei-a~$E€~$Ia 4e C $ ~t~ a$ $3t Pg s $1 ~' B f a r ~ ' a '~ ~ ~ dl~~#~,~$ pyil~a ! s y Gino !j i ~n g- ~ ~ `\ 3 ¢ 9 L y d t i p ~ ., ~' c,1 P' ~ 6 _ _ .1 _ A O ~\ ~ b- A iiEE M i d • I { `~ ~ ~3~~~~~;~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~;i ~,~'i I a ¢~i~q~rna~ Pln~a !§43d ~~dd fi~~ t9. 6 { i ~ ' ~ 1 e le ssli e j: ~ ~7 n ~ l~ a ~_ ~ ~q p ¢ e w~ tt~ L ~YI 6 ~ {~E } ~ dS p N ~a d..l ,° `.! ~ ~: 3 !p ~ ~ 3'~ li ~$ ~€ s ~,~ X11 ~~ a ~~ ~ ' # t b33p \ ~ . ~ Z ~ J ~ \ ~i ~ '~ ~ Z ~ f I \\ _. O 0 \i a i ~ ~. _ '~~; _~ ---'I _ -- Q , -~ _ ___ __ _ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ --__ ____ _ / ~ I ~} "- I d « r _ _ _ _ 7 ~+~ _ ~_ _ _ ~w.r u i~ • ~~ ~ I / / i ~;I,~'i N ~ ~il, ~ R ~ i 1: a - -+-~ ~ '~ __ _.. i ~} ~ ~ , ~ --- t ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I •I ~ ~ ~ , ,~ a a m m ~ -- m I ~ o ~~ C s ~ ~z _-,. _ ~ ~ J n ,m e ,' { 9R { •~ ,~ _ ~ O RAUINO 8EOTION9 oRCZOOZba~ez DAVIS RESIDENCE a~ ~~ RUNYAN ENGINEERING, INC. c 437 SOUTH CATARACT AVE SURE 6 ~ SAN DIMAS, G 91773 (909) 39b34% ~~ Y,• ' y.i ~` , 969E%E(6061 ELLi6 Y7'EYNIO NYE 93110E 3~Y 17YUY1Y] N1l10E LE4 '~NI `JNIa33NIJN3 NVANf1M ~,~u..~ . g i ;~: ..u .~,.r', .'> ±~:~q," #h~~,~', 4`},-, _` ,;,YS,, ~r~ e _ I ~- ,~ ---:~~ a 3 i r I I I I h F~ I I i i I 1 ~` s •~ L ~~ .,,~ 4r :cam . t , ~. f~ t S~ ~~ m 3 h m ff ;, d .~ :1 ,. ~ ;'~ J ~, i ~. .I 1 . _ i ~~,~, A_ ~ ~ C "~ ._ s w.~ ~.7 I ~" ~ ~ i . a 7 .:r: _ 969EY6E (6061 ELLI6 MJ'StlW10 WVS ' 931165 '3~tl L~tlNtlttl] NL106 LEY '~NI 1JNRI33NIJN3 NtlANfl2! 3JN301536 r ~-~ ~- ~ i ~ ~ ~S € 4 ~: FE - i JI ~ ~ ~ 1~ F II !2 III~~q-~I'I I ~ 1 ~I t~ ~ ~~ IM1 =r~ QI6 3 ml S ~' ' r Q `~,f~, s D. I ~I At n 1 i ~ { y __ I i C i l 1 -" i I .. , t i 1 , ,, ' ~ , ~, { ' i ~ 1 c~ ~ , . ~~ ~ ' 1- ,i ~ n .5. I ,, JJ a { "1 '~ti , ' ~ ~~ :~trn<t: y ~ ~J .~. ~` ~ '1 y'' I ~ ., .~ may, R . Y,' f _ ~ <1 K~~ L ~ „ ~ ~~ t n~ 1 ~ 4 _ =n 9! 1 ~ ~ ~ .. . }r F .. ~ _... „i .~ m n a io I 4 :_U~ i a ~ ~~__~~ SEGT3ON3 RUNYAN ENGINEERING, INC. m N D g ~ ~ ~ ~ ^1p~Q Osv18 wES~oE NCE 63750UTN CATARACT AYE 6UITE6 i ~ S1N DIMA$, CA 93])3 (809) 3943696 N i i ,, ~~ ~, ~~ -- L---T i *. I --~- -- ~9' ~R~ I~ A'9 i ~ ~~ ~ i}~ t Z ~ ~~~ :~ i I </~S E a2a •I a 1 '"~ PLOOR PUN -MAIN LEVEL mexooa-oozez DAVIS RE910ENCE RUNYAN ENGINEERING, INC. a3790U1N CATARACT AVE 9UITE6 9AN OIMA9, CA 91713 (909) 39b34% ~~ ~\0 r~ 9 ~~ ~, .I t, e~ `+ s ~ ~i ~t ~~ 1_ z ~ _ PSG _-~ ^ 1 a; 1 ~ '~~ t ~ 4 I w o I I I I I I 1 ^ I ' r~ ~ I ~ I ' -J I I ------- ----, I I ~, I _ rJ I I r.-__~ I I ~ ^ I I I I I I I '~ -' L__ LJ ~ I ~\ L__ _ ~_ I i i ! I I l ~. I `_---- __.___.J Z-_____._______ I I y %VE96E (608) ELLL6 YJ'fiYW10 NY9 awn w.++m b ~ M O 9 31108 7~Y 1]tltlY1tl0 N1009 Lk1 3JN301938 61~Y0 amrau ~ ~ ,'/ ~ b 13A3l NIYW~ n aoov x ~ ~ ~ Q ' '~NI'JNRi33NIJN3 NVANfkI s. i .. ~ t~ i i i I ^ i J __J i i ~-----1 0\2 9 ~y\''.~,~lc -------~ ~ 8 ~ ~I ~ ~li DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8.40 p.m. Warren Morelion November 18, 2003 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2003-00782 - HK CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct a 5,770 square foot single-family home on 55 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) located on Lot 8 at westerly terminus of Deer Canyon Dnve - APN: 1074- 331-10. Design Parameters. The lot is located within Deer Creek Estates and is an uphill condition sloping north to south (front to back). The applicant is proposing to construct a single-family home that will step southerly with the lots' natural grade. In an effort to avoid a significantly steep drive approach, the applicant is proposing a meandering driveway with aside-on three-car garage. A basement is proposed immediately adtacent the garage. The basement provides atwo-story design, with onlya one-story single-family home visible from the street. The proposed architecture is compatible with the neighborhood and complies with the Citys design requirements. The construction of the protect will require a vertical cut of more than 5 feet. Because the cut exceeds 5 feet in height, this protect requires Design Review Committee review and recommendation and Planning Commission action, according to the Hillside Development Regulations. The purpose of this review is to ensure that the proposed protect meets the intent of the Hillside Development Regulations. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Gradin .The primary issue is whether the proposed project meets the intent of the Hillside Development Regulations. The purpose of the Hillside Development Standards is to minimize the grading and bwlding mass Although two-thirds of the house is a flat pad, the creative design solution includes a garage and utility room °basement° underneath the west wing. The cut of 9 feet in the middle of the home does exceed the maximum 5 feet of cut allowed by the Hillside Ordinance; however the 9-foot cut is for an interior basement that is not wsible from public view, and therefore the visual impact is avoided. The proposed basement creates a stepped transition between the garage and home, and allows the proposed single-story structure to step up the natural slope and completely fit within the building envelope requirement. Secondary Issues: Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. All walls and fences shall be of decorative material. 2. Consider balusters to replace the wrought iron proposed on the east elevation (the balusters should match those identified on the south elevation) R 3. Consider adding the ledge stone veneer to the column bases and chimney identified on the north elevation. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed protect. Design Review Committee Action• Members Present. Larry McNiel, Richard Fletcher, Brad Buller ~~ Staff Planner Warren Morelion The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval subtect to the above-menOt`~n=,ed comments RESOLUTION NO 04-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00782, A REQUESTTO CONSTRUCTA 5,928 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON 55 ACRE OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON LOT 8 OF TRACT 12650-1 AT THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF DEER CANYON DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1074-331-10. A. Recitals. 1. H K Construction filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-00782, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The applicant isproposing atwo-story, single-family home with a 4,575 square foot main level and 1,353 square foot lower level that includes an 824 square foot garage and 529 square foot basement area (utility and laundry rooms); and b. The application applies to property located at the westerly terminus of Deer Canyon Drive, and The project is within the Hillside Overlay District; and d. The property to the north is improved with a flood control channel The property to the west is vacant, and the properties to the south and east have been developed with single-family homes; and e The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than weeds, and f. A 20.foiit private equestnan easement exists along the front of the lot which is located along the south side of the property, and ~~-\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-14 DRC 2003-00782 - H.K CONSTRUCTION January 14, 2004 Page 2 g The proposed development is consistent with single-family development in the area in terms of size and design, and h. The applicant is exporting 550 cubic yards of soil from the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives ofthe Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Division 1) Approval is for a 5,928 square foot single-family home located on Lot 8 of Tract 12650-1 at the westerly temm~us of Deer Canyon Dnve. 2) All retaining, perimeter, and return walls in public view shall be made of a decorative material, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Enoineenng Division 1) Revise existing Street Improvement Plans, Drawing No. 979, as required by the City Engineer. 2) Protect in-place and/or repair existing improvements within the public nght-of--way. 3) Pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits, Fomt CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Single-family residential projects are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0414 DRC 2003-00782 - H K CONSTRUCTION January 14, 2004 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Macias, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wd: AYES: COMMISSIONERS• NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS• O\~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-00782 SUBJECT: 5,928 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE RESIDENCE APPLICANT: HK CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: LOT 8 OF TRACT 12650-1 AT THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF DEER CANYON DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, rts agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematNe, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conddion. 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-14, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Drvision, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of theCCi~fy Planner SC-10-OS 1 O~ \ Camoletlon Date ~~ ~~ ~J ~~- ~J Protect No DRC2003-00782 Camoletion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwiding Code and ~~~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits. 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~J_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance. 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with ___/~ all receptacles shielded from public view. S All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~J_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _J~ including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permts. 11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ~~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the projects perimeter 12. Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~~ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 14. For residential development, return wails and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. ~~ Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~~ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Diwsion Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans sc-lo-o3 2 ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-00782 Comolehon Date E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent trrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l -gallon or larger stze shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. tt. of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and vrigatton shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Diwsion to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred perthe Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting. a~ 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subfect to Cary Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, ~J ~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~- J~ ~~ SC-10-03 3 ~\~ Protect No DRC2003-00782 Completion Date f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Division Protect Number (t e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4. Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls. ~~ H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00782). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Bwlding and Safety Division for availabildyof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant ~~ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not IimAed to• City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permrt and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Offiaal after tract/parcel map ~~_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6 30 a.m. Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwldtng Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind° instructions ~~ J. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading ~~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be to substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to ~_1- perform such work. 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~ time of application for grading plan check. ~ sc-i aos a ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00782 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwl Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limped to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Troll Other Deer Canyon Drive x 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnorto final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first. b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes. 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Comolehon Date _J_~- ~J- ~~ ~~- ~~_ J~ ~~- ~~- ~~- SC-10-03 5 O C..~ Protect No DRC2003-00782 Completion Date f. Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ___/_/~ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~~ L. Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_J_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days priorto final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~_ J sc-taps s ~22 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT/FILE #: DRC2003-0782 APPLICANT NAME: PROJECT NAME: Davis Residence OCCUPANCY CLASS: LOCATION: Deer Canyon road lot 8 FLOOR AREA: DATE: 12-02-03 TYPE CONSTRUCTION: PLAN TYPE: PLANNER: SFR FD REVIEW BY: Kart Coury HK Construction R-3 5928 sq ft. V-n Moises Eskenazl Non-High Fire Hazard RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS. FSC-1 Prior to bwiding permit issuance complete the following: 1 The regwred fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended. Contact CCWD for a fire flow test. Please allow 10 working days for test results Submd the fue flow letter from CCW D to FCS (909) 477-2713. 2 Illustrate the location of the closest fire hydrants to the property on the site plan to be submitted. FCS- 2 Prior to occupancy final or final complete the following: 1 Address Single-family New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during penods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 023 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 - EAGLE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - An appeal of a Design Review Committee decision denying a request to change an exterior building material fora 25,622 square foot warehouse on 1.25 acre of land in the Industnal Distract (Subarea 13), located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 0229-283-02. BACKGROUND/CHRONOLOGY: The original application was deemed complete by the City on July 8, 2002. The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on three separate occasions: August 6, 2002 - . Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) recommended conditional approval, particularly the use of Solar gray glass. The applicant's original design that was approved included exterior materials consisting of Travertine stone and painted concrete tilt-up walls with recessed horizontal bands with textured paint to match the color of the Travertine stone. The Travertine stone was used as the second primary building material and was featured on the office entrances and corners of the building facing Charles Smith Avenue The rear elevation, facing the I-15 Freeway, featured painted concrete tilt-up walls, with closely spaced horizontal reveals, that were painted to match the color of the Travertine stone. • October 1, 2002 -The Committee continued this protect because the applicant was unable to attend the meeting. The item had been rescheduled because the applicant wanted to change the glazing from Solar gray to clear glass. Staff recommended denial because it could lead to window displays and illegal signs. November 5, 2002 -The Committee (Mannerino, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the applicant's request to use clear glass. The Committee recommended denial March 17, 2003 -The City Planner approved the application with a condition requiring opaque or reflective glass. ITEM "P" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00116-Lewis Eagle January 14, 2004 Page 2 • September 18, 2003 -The applicant contacted staff to discuss a revision to the exterior of the building It was explained to the applicant any change of a main architectural material must be approved by the Design Review Committee. • October 14, 2003 -The applicant was placed on the DRC agenda to propose the change of Travertine stone to split-faced block. On the same day, the applicant withdrew the proposal to rewew his options (Exhibit °A°). • October 22, 2003 -The applicant met with staff to propose changing from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete Staff supported the proposed change because it was consistent with primary material gwdelines of Development Code Section 17.30.O60.J.7 and other bwldings in the area. Staff told the applicant that his request would be docketed on the November 4, 2003, agenda. • November 4, 2003 -The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) denied the proposed change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete; however, stated they would consider alternate materials similar to Travertine stone. The Committee felt that the heavy sandblasted concrete was not of equivalent quality to the Travertine stone. The applicant did not attend. • • November 13, 2003 -Applicant fled an appeal (Exhibit °C°) claiming that he was never . notified of the November 4, 2003, DRC meeting and his belief that heavy sandblasted concrete is appropriate. One week prior to the meeting, the applicant, and his engineer, were notified of the meeting by City's letter dated October 27, 2003. (Exhibit °D°). Staff had already verbally notified the applicant during a meeting with him on October 22, 2003. The applicant has not submitted any alternative materials RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request to change exterior material from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete, thus upholding the decision of the Design Review Committee. Respectfully submitted, Bra uller City Planner BB:EW~ma Attachments: Exhibit "A° - Exhibit "B° - Exhibit °C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit °E° - Exhibit °F° - Draft Resolut Applicant's Letter of Withdrawal from the October 14, 2003, DRC Meeting DRC Action Minutes dated November 4, 2003 Applicant's Letter of Appeal dated November 13, 2003 DRC Agenda Notification Letter October 27, 2003 Site Plan Approved Elevations (with Travertine stone) on of Denial PZ October 14, 2003 Fmily Winter 17ear Emily, EAGLE PROPERTIES Commercial and Industrial Real Estate Development tt61 EAST WAtNIJTSTREET CARSON, CALIFORNIA 80748 (370) 5378190 • FAX (370) G04-4880 -//r~~~ arc 's"U '~FCc/l~c` / 1 i~~j cGC'9~~yG~4 . ~,A Q~ `9~y~~G This is to inform you that I wish m cancel the platuted meeting with the Planning Review Committee scheduled for tonight The reason is because T want to xe~vaittate my options. Please let me know who I may see to pick up the material submitted to you in the event that you are not available. Sin , Lewis Eagle ~xh~ b;}'~~- T~TO'd 0B8G V09 0T£ P3 213JItl1N07-3i!IIdbL~ cO:TT £60Z-7T-170 CONSENT CALENDER COMMENTS Emily W liner November 4, 2003 7:10 p.m. EA nIROLIMETED PARTNERSHNP A equesEto deveop aE 5I 622 DSquare0footOwarehouseLn F Industrial District, Subarea 13 on a 1.25 acre site, located at 9275 Charles Smith venu - APN: 229-283-02. Design~e~' The project is located on the east side of Charles Smith Road on the south by Cardlock f Ilmg statnona and oethe north by an rindustnal warehouse building.aThe building is a 25,622 square foot speculative warehouse and includes a 5,104 square foot mezzanine. The applicant has asked t roved ib tthe Des gn Rev erw Committee andaPlanning Comm ssionaln travertine stone, was app y licant has submitted plans, which would change the October of 2002. Since the approval, the app exterior materials of ~e ovading. Staff informed the applicant thatthe change would require Design Review Committee app The applicant is proposing the second primary exterior material, travertine Stone, be replaceof the heavy sandblasted concrete. The sandblasted concrete would be used mainly along the west lass. The proposal elevation faamted t Itrup oncrete and features horizontal bands ofso?ar grey g he malon building is P affect the hohnzontalibands ontthe exterio~of tlheobued ngtlwhich weapoa ound t anent ety of the building The original color proposed matched the tan travertine stone. The proposed split-face block would change the horizontal reveals to a gray hue similar to the painted concrete of original nesihbosrtiood IaRende~ings and samp a of sandblasted concreite w II be available at t ei meetinge g rove the request. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee app Desi n Review Committee Action: Members Present: Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart and Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Committee did not approve the proposed material of heavy sandblasted concrete. The Committee stated they are open to review other material similar to travertine stone. ~g•' p~ EAGLE PROPERTIES Commerolal and InduaMal Real Estate Development 1187 EAST WALNUY STREET CARSON, CALIFORNIA 80748 (310) 537.8190 • FAX (310)8044880 November 13, 2003 Planning D1vislon City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Atta.: Piaaaing sevisx commutes Ra: 9275 Cherries Smith Ad., jtaar~c Cuaamoa4a (ABJR: 228-283-02) Dear Sir or Madam: I am a principal of Eagle Family Limited Partnership (the Partnership), owner of the above-reference~hero~peign~Review per architectural plans pzeviously approved by Committee (the DRC), the Partnership has proposed to build an industrial building on the above property. By this letter, the Partnership is appealing to the ofathenuseiofssand-blasted9concrete on portionseof the proposed building=a exterior, instead of travertine stone as originally approved. Enclosed for that purpose is a check, made payable to the City, in the sum of $62.00. I first learned of the DRC=s denial of our request in a November 10. 2003 a-mail I received from assistant planner Emily Wiener. In that a-mail, Ms. Wiener infozmed me that the DRC riad reached the foregoing decision on November 4, 2003" ealspFriod that the PartOSedstopbe1a11ottedtafterfdenials,dey apP that is supp Neither Ms. Wiener=s a-mail, nor tha DRC=s "Consent Calendar Comments" (the Comments) for November 4 cite any specific reasons why the DRC denied our request and overruled the recommendations of its staff, so Y can only speak to the issue generally. Sand-blasted concrete, as an exterior material, fully complies with the City=s Development Code and Design Guide;ines, because it is compatible with surrounding land use and architecture. Many other buildings in the area already use that ~Xh1b~+C,~ ~ Planning Division Page 2 November 13, 2003 material, and it has proved to pzovide a visually attractive, high-quality, durable finish. Sand-blasted concrete is specifica~~erialefornindustrial buildings@ asectponper primary building 17.30.060(J). There is a factual error in the Comments which 2 need to address. The Comments say that the "proposed split-face blocx would change the horizontal reveals to a gray hue similar to the painted concrete of original design." This is incorrect. Neither the original plans nor the request for modification proposed the use of split-face block, which produces a rough- textured exterior surface. Sand-blasted concrete, by contrast, provides a fairly smooth surface. The error reflecMed.in the Comments might indicate that the DRC misunderstood the change that we requested. Had I been present on November 4, I could have corrected any misapprehensions. But I never received advance notice from the DRC that our request was on its agenda that day. Due to the very short time given us to appeal, I have not had a full chance to review the Development Code, but it does look like we should have gotten advance notice. According to Section 17.02.070, any request for a change in conditions of approval is to be considered a "major revision, "rovalaproeedurerandsauthority to be processed through the same app which ggranted the original approval. Section 17.06.010(E)describes the original approval process. It =ays that, after a completed application is accepted for design review, the project shall be set on the first available agenda for committee reviews and that the applicant, among others, is to be notified at least ten days prior to the meetings. Please bring this appeal on for hearing as soon as possible, since the Partnership suffers financial loss each and every day that construction continues to be delayed. Ms. Wimer told me that the first available date is January 14, ?.004. If at all possible, I ask that you move this hearing date up. Also, please give me the DRCas specific grounds for denying the modification request so that I can participate more meaningfully in the appeal. I have worked hard to make sure that the proposed building will have visual appeal. T take pride in the fact that the building, i! constructed, would serve to enhance the community, both aesthetically and economically. = regret the necessity o~ having to initiate this appeal, but I am confident that, once the Planning Division has the opportunity to hear and consider my Planning Division Page 2 November 13, 2003 presentation, it will be persuaded to grant our request. We look forward to working with the City to make this project an unqualified success. Very ruly yours, Lewis Eagle LJ .vrsa.n...mc `1 J 1 ~,~ ~A THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M Wui.rnra J. nuxwoF~.R Mayor RroTrm Duxe Wniumrs Cou Rnc G Roerxr J. HowDxsrrnu. Dorw.o J. KuRrtt, M.D. Gty Marr~~aagg~n Jn« I.nnt, AICP jZANCIIo ~',UCAMONGA October 27, 2003 Eagle Family Limited Partnership 1161 E. Walnut Street Carson, CA 90746 Dear Applicant Your project, DRC2002-00116, has been scheduled to be reviewed at the following dates and times. To assure the successful completion of your project, your participation at these meetings is requested. The meetings are held at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive (2 Ys miles north of the I-10 Freeway at Haven Avenue). DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: November 4. 2003. ~ 7:10 o.m. These Committees are an essential part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Development Review Process. The Committee's review allows major development issues and technical problems to be addressed prior to Planning Commission. This process is described fully in 'The Development Review Process' guidebook available in the Planning Division. A copy of staffs comments to the Design Review Committee are attached. Please review these comments and develop appropriate responses. In order to expedite the process, applicants are encouraged to resolve these issues at the stafflevel priorto 1Commlttee review, whenever possible. It is expected that the applicant will come prepared with revised plans or sketches to show the Committee which address the attached comments. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Emity Wimer at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Cinrwraly. DC:EWUrra Attachment ~~ ~.. _.- .... ........ ..n , nnn ~.,-r n-~nn . c_ on01'T/_~IIGO r warm n_nn[~o-ClIf2mOI1Q~.dLL4 Principal Planner . ~. ,-..,~u ._ . 1E Q7Y OF R,wcNO CU(MfONGA 500 Cm< Cen[u Dave ~ Sox 807 • Rancho Cuwnon~, CA 91729-0807 Eagle Family Limited Partnership 1161 E. Walnut Street Carson, CA 90746 • OP RnNGHO G1KJIMONG 1500 Cmc Cmn:r Drne 7 Box 807 • Rancho Cuamonga, CA 91729-0807 Richard Cartozian Nazarian Engineering 24254 Hawthone Torrance, CA i P°~ a 4 EXlS11NG BUILD/NG n ~ I o®®®® .I~LW.W.W~ 1QIL~11..~J.Il1[~ r EX/S77NG BU/LD/NG y I m I Gi ®®®®® ®®®® Z Exrsn c euicDiNC g -l~ ~~ li ~I ~I ,I V/~V y CANOPY ~.®.~ • a C / f g •( L ~ ~ ~ _~ __ 1 ~`1 4 1 ~ _. ~E ~ I h '1 y1 I ~ ~~ ~4 F ~Y~ ~ ~C ~~ I rF ~ Y~ %~ :~ { `h ~~~ I •~ ~~! ' ti~ `I~' iv I ,s I ~' 3 ^' i ~i 1 ~ I ~i I I :.~ 3`~ jtf i ~ L i~' I ?~ 1 ~i }~~ ~€ x L L: A I k 0 ' 1 I I r i I J I I I "4 r I e ~ 1 I .I e ~ L ' F I ~ t 1 II T^ ~~~3~ ~' I , y f ~;};~ 9r f _l i ay ' 9~ >* ti ~ } t~ t • a 2 •; c V W~ A ~' i .~ _}Fr i;.' a r;R ~.I ~,r, .;~. :::1 a i t~ 7. f~ of :~ :~ 3j 1~ 2; !. ~ ~~~,~ i~ r~ 6 ~` ~ is 9 i;~~ ~ ~~e 3t~ €~ :~' :~ %°_ aaL s 4 t t z s ~. ~ i. ~ J L ~ _} ~; Yi S ~' ~. r } E :~ ~e z~,yi ~i` i Q~~ .f i ~ a ~ •~ ' 1 ~ .! i ~ ~ ~' . ~ ~ ~ L~ ( e i 1 ~ L I r• c i I a I ~ 'J i ~~ I Z a ~ ~ I < . i >, , ~ ~ ~ I Y1= _ I ~1.~ w r x S f= t ~ LL ~,~ F~- ' ~ t C ` : ~ ^ ~~ V~ l• ' ~\~ o ' ~ L r I ~ Ci = 1 ,] I ~IR.I ~ I i •~ :4 1 a F =1 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ \ •r ` II { } \) 1/ ~~ ~ ~ ~j ~~ O ` , +~ F • ~ I , t _J -- } x f ~ i i t 1 j P~3 i i a i a Ss C i~ ~* t~~ Rr ~_~_ L t~ }~} F~ ~ti l~ ~~~ i~ C i, ~~ O~ n a`O~ O~~ti i~~~ ~'l v s z i F a \~ f 1~-- t o 3 Z -.~ ~ a u 1 ~~ L ~~ ): S 111 RESOLUTION NO 0415 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE REQUEST TO CHANGE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS FROM TRAVERTINE STONE TO HEAVY SANDBLASTED CONCRETE FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116, A 25,622 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATED AT 9275 CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-283-02. A. Recitals. 1. On March 17, 2003, the City Planner conditionally approved Development Review DRC2002-00116. The development plans, stamped and signed "City Planner Approval," spenfied Travertine stone and painted concrete tilt up walls with recessed honzontal bands with textured paint to match the color of the Travertine stone. 2. Lewis Eagle filed an application to modify the approved exterior budding materials for Development Revew DRC2002-00116, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafterin this Resolution, the subtect modification request is referred to as "the application" 3 On November 4, 2003, the Design Review Committee, a subcommittee of this Planning Commission, considered the applicant's request to change the matenals. The Committee derned the request on the basis that the proposed heavy sandblasted concrete was not of equivalent quality as the Travertine stone The Committee indicated they were willing to consider other materials similar to Travertine stone The applicant did not attend the meeting. 4. The derision of the Design Review Committee was timely appealed to this Commission. 5. On the 14th day of January 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application proposes to change the second primary exterior building material from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete on the west, north, and south elevations. The budding is designed with painted concrete tilt up walls ~nnth recessed honzontal bands with textured paint to match the color of the Travertine stone; and P \~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-15 DRC 2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE January 14, 2004 ,r Page 2 / b. The application to change from Trave ne stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is contrary to the intent of Rancho Cucamonga Municip Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 30 Industnal Distncts, Section 17 30 060 Gener Design Guidelines, Subsection 17 30.060 J 7 Architecture and Design, to require "creatwe u of budding materials" because Sandblasted concrete is an exterior budding material that is mmonly used in the Industnal area, whereas, the Travertine stone is a unique design material at is rare m the Industnal area On the approved development plans, the Travertine stone is t e exterior matenal prominently featured on the office entrances and comers of the budding face Charles Smith Avenue, and c The application to cha a from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is contrary to the intent of the City of R ncho Cucamonga General Plan Community Design Policy 6 4.1.8 to "continue to implement d update, as necessary, our City's comprehensive design guidelines for residential, commerc I, and industnal development." 3 Based upon the sub antial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon t speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and ncludes as follows a. The propo ed project is not consistent vnth the objectives of the General Plan, and b. The pro osed use is not in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the dist ct in which the site is located, and c The roposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions ofthe Development Code. 4. Based pon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission ereby denies the application vvithout prejudice to refile with alternate materials similar to Trave ine stone 5. Tt~ Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PL BY. AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Macias, chainnan Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit. 1 \~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-15 DRC 2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE January 14, 2004 Page 2 b The application to change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is contrary to the intent of Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 30 Industnal Distncts, Section 17 30 060 General Design Gwdelines, Subsection 17 30 060 J 7 Architecture and Design, to regwre "creative use of budding matenals" because Sandblasted concrete is an extenor budding matenal that is commonly used in the Industnal area, whereas, the Travertine stone is a unique design matenal that is rare in the Industnal area On the approved development plans, the Travertme stone is the extenor matenal prominently featured on the office entrances and comers of the budding faang Charles Smith Avenue, and c The application to change from Travertine stone to heavy sandblasted concrete is contrary to the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Community Design Policy 6 4 1 8 to "continue to implement and update, as necessary, our City's comprehensive design gwdelines for residential, commercial, and industnal development " 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed protect is not consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and -~ b The proposed a:FS2 prOj@Ct is not in accord with the obtectroes of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and y c The proposed tdS2 prOj@Ct is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the application without pretudice to refile with alternate matenals similar to Travertine stone The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution BY APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit i°/~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0415 DRC 2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE January 14, 2004 Page 3 AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: \~ Z0 d ~H101 DECLARATION OF JACK NAZARIAPT I am a licensed structural eagtneer. Lewis Eagle retained me with respect to to the induatnal building he proposes to build at 9275 Charles Smith Rd., Rancho Gl~eameaga. I mm submitting this declaration is support of Mr. Eagle's appeal of the Design Review Commission's November 4, 2003 desist of his request fnr modificatrotL Bach fact staled in this declaration is within sty personal knowledge, and I am willing and competent to testify as to each. 2. I river mceivod say advance notice from the City of Rancho G~uamonga (or from any of its agencies, divisions, commissions or departments), either is waling or otherwise, that, on November 4, 2003, the Deatgrr Review Committee (DRC) would be considering Mr. Eagle's request for approval of the use ofsand-blasted concrete oa the exterior of the proposed building. I bad no idea, prior to November 4, 2003, that the DRC world be considering Mr. Eagle's request or that any aspect of the protect would be on its agenda that day. Had I received advance nohee from the City of the November 4, 2003 pmceediaga, I would have aamediately utformed the pmjert arrhttect, Richard ICaztoaan, orlKr. Eagle, and, if the notice was in writing, I would have imraediatclypUOVided them wi8t a copy of the notice. I declare turde; peraiiy of perjury under fne laws of the State of Caliiomia that the foregoing is true and coaeet Bxecuted this 7 ~ day of January, 2004, at s, Califvmia. /L`' or~l~,p~~~ Jack Nazariaa (/O %C/"l Tf11.LlYJ~1w1/fw t.-Y ~. r. ..~ ~. ~~ Z0iZ0'd 088b b09 0t£ a3NIFilNOJ-321IdW3 LS:ZT b00Z-L0-Ntit 0T d 1tl101 i z a EAGLE ~~ + PROPERTY ~~ CARDLOK GAS ~~ STATION ~ , 5 BUILDINGS NEW DEVELOPMENT ~'~ SAND BLASTED CONCRETE DESIGN ~_ 1 5 .. L I 1 1 I 1 I I I . _ i ~_.!t Mb~lfp .~.~ G _ ~ F _~ s Y - ~ ~_ i • ~ N 0Ti0i'd 088h b09 0T£ b3N[tl1NOJ-3aIdW3 90 •£T d00Z-£I-Ntlf ~ ,ii