Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/02/11 - Agenda PacketFEBRUARY 11, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A enda 2 - 5 A Resolution to Change the Location of the 6 - 7 Plannin Commission Meetm s B Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015 8 - 31 C Environmental Assessment & Conditional Use 32 - 127 Permit DRC2003-00719 D Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract 128 - 211 Ma SUBTT16644 E, F, G Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract 212 - 373 Map SUBTT16651 Variance DRC2003-00848 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-00847 H Develo ment Review DRC2003-01246 374 - 397 • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CUOAMONGA FEBRUARY 11, 2004 - 7:00 PM Cucamonga County Water District Board Room 10440 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Macias Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS ~I~ III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 14, 2004 January 28, 2004 it IV. CONSENT CALENDAR ' The following Consent Calendardems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one time wdhout discussion If anyone has concern over any ttem, d should be removed for discussion A RESOLUTION TO CHANGE THE LOCATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings m which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wad to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Comm~ss~on by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaking PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ' FEBRUARY 11, 2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2 B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01015 -WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES - A request to establish an office use within the historic Norton-Fisher House, in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, and Community Services Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue APN - 0227-131-24 C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC -The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the Village Commeraal District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN. 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66 Related Files Preliminary Revew DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 3 33 acres of land into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling unts per acre) located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Ciehto Street -APN I 0202-741-64 and 0202-751-36 and 37 Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideraton E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivision for condominwm purposes on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel -APN 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Development Review DRC2003-00847, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration F VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS ATREDHILL) - A request to increase the maximum building height and maximum retaining wall height permitted m the hillside area, for a proposed 92 condomirnum development on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel -APN. 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651, Development Review DRC2003-00847, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 C~ C~ n ~J C~ • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 11, 2004 3 Rnxceo CUCAMONGA VL NEW BUSINESS G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) -The design review of bwldmg elevations and detailed site plan for 92 condominiums consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters on 6.90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER -The design review of elevations fora 12-plex Multi-Cinema, 2 story, 61,283 square foot movie theater (AMC) in the Mixed-Use District of the Victoria Community Pfan in the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center, located at the southeast corner of Cultural Center Dnve and Kew Avenue - APN 0227-201-35 This action is within the scope of the protect reviewed m an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Pian amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Said EIR was certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned in this notice is regwred pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the bme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planrnng Commission has adoptedAdm~n~strative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme If dems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 11, 2004 jtnxceo CIICAMONGA 4 Lors Schrader, Planning Dtviston Secretary of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my I , designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 5, 2004, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga and at 10440Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga ~. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the f tanning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaued • • • • • E, F, Vicinity Map Planning Commission February 11, 2004 Meeting Location Cucamonga County Water District Offices 10440 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 * City Hall N City of Rancho Cucamonga >rx• y w y T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE February 11, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Gall Sanchez, Planning Commisslon Secretary SUBJECT RESOLUTION TO CHANGE THE LOCATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS BACKGROUND As the retrofit protect at the Civic Center has progressed, the portion of the protect affecting the Council Chamber has been completed Therefore, the regular meetings of the Planning Commission will return to the Rancho Cucamonga City Hall Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, effective February 25, 2004 The meetings will continue to start at 7 00 p m on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached Resolution to change the location of the Planning Commission meetings Respectful submitted Bra uller City Planner BB GS Is Attachment Draft Resolution of Approval to change location of PC Meetings ITEM "A" RESOLUTION NO 04-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME, AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A Recitals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga relocated the Planning Commission meetings dunng seismic retrofitting of the CounGl Chamber at City Hall 2 The seismic retrofit of the Council Chamber at City Hall is now complete. 2. All legal preregwsites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Commencing with the February 25, 2004, meeting, regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission shall be held at the Rancho Cucamonga City Hail Councl Chamber, 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, Calrfomia, on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month Each such regular meeting shall commence at 7:00 p m APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Macias, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ~Z-- ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ ( \ T H E I T Y O F ANCt10 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE February 11, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01015 - WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES - A request to establish an office use within the historic Norton-Fisher House, in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract, and Community Services Overlay District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-24 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Background On September 21, 1988, the City Council designated the Norton-Fisher House a local landmark The house sat vacant for a number of years and in 1993 the property owner requested permission to demolish it In early 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission denied that request and recommended the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to further evaluate the proposed demolition request No further action was taken and again the house sat vacant for a number of years, except for being occupied by an occasional transient The Etiwanda School District chose to develop the property around the house for the Grapeland Elementary School, and in 2001 moved the house north approximately 500 feet, to its current location Dunng the last year various improvements were completed (i e , painting the exterior, replacing the roof, repairing and/or replacing windows and doors, and removing interior debris), funded through $63,500 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds For the 2003 program-year, the CDBG program funded an additional $160,000 for the restoration and historic preservation of the house These funds will be used to complete various interior and exterior improvements B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract, Community Service Overlay District, vacant railroad right-of-way, and the Etiwanda Depot South - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, Community Service Overlay District, and Grapeland Elementary School ITEM "B" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01015 -WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES February 11, 2004 Page 2 East - Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, Community Service Overlay District, and Grapeland Elementary School West - Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract, Community Service Overlay District, and an existing church C General Plan Designations Project Site - Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Open Space, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and Proposed Park Overlay South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The Norton-Fisher House is located on a finished lot on the site of the Grapeland Elementary School The site was graded for development of the overall school site The property slopes rather steeply along the north and west property lines, but levels out for a pad below the house The house was placed on a raised foundation that is situated on the westerly half of the project site The property is surrounded by a wrought iron fence, which allows for access from the south property line, adjacent to the school parking lot Currently, there is no landscaping on the project site. E Parking Calculations Tvoe of Use Professional Office Square Parking Foota a Ratio 1, 602 1 /250/250 Number of Number of Spaces Spaces Regwred Provided 7 See below No parking is provided directly on-site for the Norton-Fisher House, but parking is provided at the adtacent Grapeland Elementary School In July 2002, the City and the Etiwanda School Distract entered into a Joint Use Agreement to accommodate for any parking needs for both the school and the house The Joint Use Agreement identifies that the school district has exclusive use of the parking lot during school hours (7 00 a m to 4 30 p m ), and the City has exclusive use during non-school hours F Applicable Regulations The Etiwanda Specific Plan permits the development of professional and medical offices in the Community Service Overlay District, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes to complete on-site improvements and renovate the interior of the Norton-Fisher House and operate their family counseling services program, which is currently located in an office complex in Terra Vista These services include counseling, parent education classes, and training seminars The applicant will operate an office use with a staff of three persons between 9 00 a m to 3 00 p m , Monday C.bt PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01015 -WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES February 11, 2004 Page 3 through Thursday The clinical activities will occur in the afternoons and evenings between the hours of 3 00 p m and 8 00 p m ,Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday where they typically have between 3 to 7 participants, and occasionally up to 20 persons in attendance B Parkin The Joint Use Agreement between the City and the Etiwanda School District identifies when parking will be available on the school site for the exclusive use of either party As previously identified, the school district has exciusroe use of parking between 7 00 a.m and 4.30 p m., which conflicts directly with the ability of West End staff to access available parking during then scheduled daytime hours To operate their offices out of the Norton-Fisher House, the applicant will need to have parking opportunities available to them, and unfortunately there is not sufficient space to provide any additional parking spaces on the site of either the Norton-Fisher House or the Grapeland Elementary School. The school distract has verbally indicated that if parking spaces are available durng the time of their scheduled exclusive use, that West End staff may freely access any available spaces However, if West End's use of these parking spaces for either office or clinical use becomes a problem, or parking spaces are not available, there is the opportunity to access parking spaces at the Chaffey-Garcia House or the Chaffey-Isle House (after renovation is completed), as neither of these historic properties have any regular daytime uses. C Land Use Compatibility. Land use compatibility focuses on how the proposed use and any adtacent uses, or uses within a reasonable proximity essentially get along The focus of the compatibility question is the foreseeability of conflict between proposed activities of the applicant and the potential for conflict between adjacent uses The primary land use in the wcinity is the Grapeland Elementary School, which is located directly south and east of the Norton-Fisher House Aland use conflict between the school and the applicant is not antiapated, as the applicant's minor office uses will occur during school hours, and their more involved clinical activities will be scheduled after school hours when the possibility for conflict is extremely low In fact, the only activities conducted by the applicant that could impact the school are their larger training sessions, and these are often conducted for the benefit of, and include, school personnel. Other land uses in the vianity include the existing lumberyard to the north, and a church and two historic properties to the west The applicant does not conduct any office or clinical activties that could have a foreseeable impact to the lumberyard's operation The potential for conflict between the applicant and the properties to the west is extremely low, as these land uses do not have any regularly scheduled weekday or daytime uses There are residential uses beyond the land uses discussed, but because of the proximity of these residential uses to the Norton-Fisher House, no land use conflicts are anticipated D Environmental Assessment The application is exempt per Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act FACTS FOR FINDING The Etiwanda Specific Plan (Section 5 404(c)) identifies that the establishment of a commeraal or office use in the Community Service Overlay District requires the Planning Commission to make the following fi(n~din2gs V J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01 01 5-WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES . February 11, 2004 Page 4 Finding 1: The proposed use or protect will not have an adverse impact on the quality of surrounding residential areas, and FacUs The proposed use or protect meets the intent of the Community Services Overlay (CS/OL) District, and will enhance the visual and historical character of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015, subfect to the conditions in the attached Resolution. Respecttully submitted, ' Brad er City Planner • BB TG/Im Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant, dated August 11, 2003 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015 'Qi~ a ~~6.~ F~i -~~~ d I~ , ------ _ , y I ~ ~ 1324 I ~' ®,(( ~ 1323 ti j ' `~ 1322 ' ~ ~~/ `~ ~ C~ '~ ~» 36 ~ y Js V it / ga 1' 1321 ,I - '~~ 1----~ - ~,; Q ~ 1320 Y ;y i~ ~; 1319 ~- /~ i i i~ r f~ e ~ 15 ~./ ~ ~ ( ;~ ~I v Iro ass ~ ~~~ ~ y „ - ~ ~ J ° ~' 318 I I i ', ~ 0 1s' n i e r ~----------- r ~ 4~`b. Q(n p ~ I '~jy ~ , ZE O ~ I~ i P~ '~ '~ _ ~ ! 6.T ~ J6A/ - - ~ I~ ~ - k O ~ o @ ®®©®O®00 DO 00000 v~ O^'3 ~ ~~~9'd ~~Eaak ~~~~~ ~ NOR'fl~ 2 0 ~ R~$$$3$~SRR ~RRB% "o m} R Sg~~~~~ a~~ R$E3 g~ ~~ { 6~~~a~~ tae 'aaag o ice' ~ q; ~€~ gx~; n S ~°c, ~ ~€ h ~` e ~ oa<~.~N .NNI.p9E- B 8p auwuu wxnMe wo.i~+ W~6anu C~rao Arduu b W xo e. o+i[ p65Olianori - rn6mwse~~ae r D AI6iY110~A,i1WDOClCYOUAU ..,.~--- ~~ 2)6 NaM Sacatl Avenw ~ n uY AIDf6W CCUlSln mna uqw t.rewrr a+namm Y.. t'Or~3~~9 Boba ~M F eOSYet rmr • e ~% b ~i Fm S L J e° 2 4 4 3 w r________________ ----------------- I -------- _ _ _ __ ___ OSE _ 1 -.-.- ----. .ij"- -- --- --~-~.-_- ~ ~ ROOT1 a3 ' 'i ~ ~ ' I NORTH PORCH I; ~ )) I BEDRL'Of'I a ' ° BEDRC'OM p2 -~~~ , I;I; { - ~i~-~'~ I ~C pp ~q~ I (r 1 I I T' ,II ROOM a4 i k ( ~{~ d4 ~'~ I ~Iµ' 'N~j ' ' I I 4 :'9 II KITCHEN R001'1 a5 j `,9 _ ~,S I _ I I I I • ; : III I ENTRT 3' ?'T ~ d ' ; ; I '1 ~T RESTR \ DINING R00 3' ROOM ay ~ ~~ i j PORCH ' I 1 ."- I DEMOLITON K(YNOTE3 ` p ~ 6 $ ~ ~ ~ I ' LIVING RG101'I 410 I'vFff+______~ " ' $ $ @ SOUTH PORCH , .,~, I I II•' 8 J I . I ~ __.__----__..-_..-.------„_~.-.1J e--------------- n r_________________ L_______~ 11 I ~ § F~64 N 1 II 1 JI I L J EKISTWG CONDITION AND DEMOLITION PLAN v.+o r _____________ _ __ I _________ ~ ________________~ I n ' I ~I,I 1 1 S 1 CSI K6ld ^~ + ~ I NORTH PORCH i 4y i CEPTI ~ BUSINE5~5 OFFICE "' i i LOBBT/RE ~ g O I TCH OFFICE ~ _ _ _ _ I i NEW CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES ~ k g $ I ~ I I IIO IOT 3' I I 3' ~,S - I I 1 ly1RGE GROUP j - ----- ITEM9 TO BE DEMOLI9M~^ ITEM9 TO REM41N ~ , ~ I I I HALL ENTRT HALL 10'1 3' 109 IOB ~ , 3~ ''~ ROOI'I I 106 I i I I i ~ NEW CON9TRUGTICN _ _ _ _ CEILING 90FFIT / 11 ~~d ~~Tt I I I 3~ WEST PORCH REST~LL~TI ~ I I ~ I I I I I i L_____1 I ~ d j! ~ .' I ' OFFICE OFFICE :'[ 103 104 ; ____ ' ~yFO ~ ~~ I I SOUTH Po N i ~ ~~ ' L_ ______ ~ ~_________________~ n w ~.. m . e-e ~ I II I I m .nu ~ _______~I I L _J ~ ~ NEW CONDITION A? ~ ur+o LEGEND West End Faintly Counseling Services serving our communities since 1955 August 11, 2003 Tom Gratin City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE Norton Fisher House Renovation Dear Tom• In support of our request for a Conrhtional Use Permit for the Norton Fisher House property located at 7171 Ehwanda Avenue, enclosed please 5nd copies of the Existing Condr6on and Demolition Plan, New Condition Plan, and Site and Grading Plan, prepared by Williams Ctuao Architects As the plans indicate, we plan only minor alteration to the intenor plan with the intent of preserving much of the ongmal look and feel of the house, both inside and out The use we contemplate will be for the West End Family Counseling Sernces Family and Children's Center Counseluig, parent education classes, and training seiiiiiiars will be the activities at this site Hours of operation when clients will be visiting the facility are planned for Monday through Thursday from 2 00 PM until 8 00 PM A core staff of two or three persons may be present from noon unh18 00 PM Monday through Thursday to open the facility and to perform administrative functions The facility may be open occasionally on Saturdays for Etiwanda Histoncal Society tours and events The architect's plan calls out seven parking spaces It is our understanding that additional pazking is available across the street at the site of the other histoncal homes. This additional pazking may be used when occasional training achvmes occur in the afternoon or when the Histoncal Society conducts tours and events It is the intention of West End Family Counseling Services to renovate and maintain the Norton Fischer House in close consultation with the Etiwanda Histoncal Society and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Our Agency has conducted business in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for over three decades and has served the West Valley region since 1955 The Etiwanda Historical Society has reviewed and approved our proposed use of the Norton Fisher House and our Agency's volunteer Board of Directors has also approved the protect. We look forwazd to working the City to ensure that our use is compatible and enhances the neighborhood Please contact me if you require addmonal infonnahon. cerely, Jed Shafer President and Chief Executive Officer Cc• Max Williams, Williams Chiao Architects, LLP Tom Magian, Chai, Wes[ End Family Counseling Sernces Facilities Committee Jan Suttoq Etiwanda Histonca] Society .. _. ~_.ri.r 1\/ /~ Ontario Headquarters ~/.~t~ Rancho Cucamonga Office 655 North Euclid Avenue L~J/ 10630 Tawn Center, Swte 123-A Ontario CA 91762 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 [909) 963-2020 FAX (909] 963-6847 (909] 980.3004 FAX (909] 481-1519 RESOLUTION NO 04-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-01015, THE REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AN OFFICE USE WITHIN THE HISTORIC NORTON-FISHER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OVERLAY DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-131-24 A Recitals 1 West End Family Counseling Services filed an application forthe issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-01015, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sublect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 11th day of February 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 Ali legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearng on February 11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 39 92 feet and lot depth of 189 50 feet, and is presently improved with an existing local historic landmark (Norton-Fisher House), and b The property to the north of the sublect site is vacant railroad nght-of-way and a lumberyard, the property to the south and east consists of the Grapeland Elementary School, and the property to the west includes a church and the historic Chaffey-Garcia House and Chaffey-Isle House, and c The Norton-Fisher House is a single story structure, constructed on a raised foundation, that includes a total of 1,602 square feet, and d The applicant proposes to establish a minor office use to conduct counseling, parent education classes, and training seminars, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-21 DRC2003-01 01 5-WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES February 11, 2004 Page 2 e The applicant proposes to operate an office use with a staff of three persons between 9 00 a m to 3 00 p m , Monday through Thursday, and clinical activities during the afternoons and evenings between the hours of 3'00 p m and S 00 p m ,Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Clinical actvities typically have between 3 to 7 partiapants, and occasionally up to 20 persons m attendance, and f In July 2002, the City and the Etiwanda School District entered into a Joint Use Agreement to accommodate for any parking needs for both the school and the house. The Joint Use Agreement identifies that the school district has exclusive use of the parking lot during school hours (7 00 a m to 4 30 p m ), and the City has exclusive use during non-school hours 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mturious to properties or improvements m the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code d The proposed use or protect wdl not have an adverse impact on the quality of surrounding residential areas e The proposed use or protect meets the intent of the Community Services Overlay (CS/OL) District, and will enhance the visual and historical character of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Diwsion 1) This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other(Cit~y Ordinances t~ \ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-21 DRC2003-01015 -WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES February 11, 2004 Page 3 3) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adfacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use 4) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels 5) Any signs proposed for the faality shall be designed m conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance, and shall regwre review and approval by the City Planner prior to installation 6) No modification to the exterior of the Norton-Fisher House is permitted without the express approval of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission for review of a Landmark Alteration Permit 7) The applicant shall limit hours of operation to between 9 00 a m and 8 00 p m ,Monday through Friday, and the clinical hours of operation shall be limited to be between the hours of 3 00 p m and 8 00 p.m , Monday through Frday, except for occasional evening or weekend special events Any modification to the approved hours of operation will regwre a modification to this Conditional Use Permit 8) On a regular basis, the applicant shall coordinate the scheduling of events and activities with the Etiwanda School District to avoid conflicts and to ensure adequate parking is available 9) The applicant shall enter into a lease agreement with the City pnor to the issuance of any permits or the construction of any physical improvements to the Norton-Fisher House This lease agreement will regwre the approval of the City CouncU 10) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Enameenng Division 1) None 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-21 DRC2003-01015 -WEST END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES • February 11, 2004 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chauman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS 1/~\ ems... j . __ ., West End Fumlly Counselnsg Serv(ces l serveng our communities since 1955 ~1 \~ Z1 ~ Headquarters 855 North Euclid Avenue `~, Ontano, Cahforma 91762 w (909) 983-2020 Rancho Faallty 10630 Town Center, Sufte 123 Rancho Cucamonga, Callforma 91730 (909)980-3004 ;~,~ Leh ~`~~ Y. ~ O WES'C END FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES Serving our communities since 1955 ANNUAL REPORT 2002-2003 www. wefcs. org A United Way Agency Since 1956 Contract Provider San Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health Since 1970 Charter Member Agency California Council of Community Mental Health Agencies West End Family Counseling Services provides high-quality, affordable, innovative programs for the diverse communities the Agency serves 0 Serving our communtues Page 19 since 1955 United Way Annual Review Comments from the United Way Liaison Team: "West End Family Counseling Services pro- vides valuable programs and services to the community especially through its school- based counseling program and Rancho Cucamonga counseling program." "The agency has institutionalized outcome- based measurement, and appears to have adopted an "outcomes" culture " "The agency board is fully informed on the outcomes achieved." "Resources and activities dedicated to measuring program outcomes are sufficient, and the results are being utilized to improve the agency's programs..." RATING: Exceeds Expectations Page 13 West End Family Counseling Services Foundation Financial Highlights West End Family Counseling Services Foundation is an independent entity, the sole purpose of which is to provide financial support to the Agency Tota/Assets $107,092 Totel current and /ong term /iabddies 0 Net Assets, Beginning of Year 108,397 Net Assets, End of Year 107,092 Revenue Grants 10,000 Contributions 5,584 Board Challenge Matching Fund 3,225 /nterest 1,843 Co/%ction Boxes 37 Dividends 33 Totes/Revenue 20,722 Transfers to Agency 25, 000 End of Year Revenue Surp/us/increase in Net Assets (>,305J J Serving our communities since 1955 Pnge12 v Agency Financial Highlights The Agency receives an annual independent financial audit, conducted by Vavrtnek, Tnne, Day & Company, LLP Totes/Assets $601,779 Totes/currant and /ong term /iabtldies 403,262 Net Assets, Begtmm~g of Year 196,1 f7 NetAssets, End of Year 198,517 Revenue Behawora/Hea/th 897,090 Schoo/-based Counse/m9 361,795 Mount Ba/dy United Way 120,341 Program Service Fees 74,309 Foundation Transfers 25, 000 Community Services 6, 029 /merest 62B Misce//aneous /ncome 578 Totes/Revenue 1,485,770 Totes/Expenses 1,483,370 End of Year Revenue Surp/us//ncrease m Net Assets 2,400 1'ogel West End Faintly Counseling Services Annual Report Fiscal Year July 1, 2002 -June 30, 2003 West End Faint/y Counseling Services /s a private/y operated, nonprofit, pub/ic benefit chanty Headquarters 855 North Euclid Avenue Ontario, California 91762 (909) 983-2020 Rancho Facility 10630 Town Center, Suite 123 Rancho Cucamonga, Caltfomia 91730 (909) 980-3004 www.wefcs.org 0 Serving our communities West End ~, since 1955 Pa8e2 Pagell Family Couuseltg Servtces Our Mission West End Family Counse/ing Services provides high-qua/ity, affordab/e, innovative programs for the diverse communities the Agency serves Summary of Direct Client Servtces Schoo/-based Programs >3, 66> Behaviors/Health Contract Services 6,384 Parent Education 2, 318 Rancho Low-cost Counseling 1,434 Other Programs and Services 2,427 Totes/ Combined Hours of Direct C/lent Services 26,224 Net Cost per Hour of Direct Client Services $56 56 1 t~ _ Serving our commurseties ''~ Bence 1955 Agency Programs Other Programs and Services Parent Education Page 10 The Agency offers parent education workshops in English and Spanish at various locations within the communities we serve. The Agency provides specialized parenting classes for the Family Solutions project in south Ontario. No Cost Prescription Medication Dispensary Agency physicians oversee the prescribing and dispens- ing of the latest, most effective psychotropic medicabons. Donations from several major pharmaceutical companies allow the Agency to dispense over $50,000.00 worth of medications each year at no cost to Agency clients who cannot afford to purchase medications prescribed by our physicians as part of their mental health treatment. Intern Training Graduate students from several universities participate in structured supervised internships The Agency offers indi- vidual and group supervision, in addition to a training cur- riculumfor tomorrow's mental health professionals. Information, Free Screening, and Referral The Agency receives over 1,000 inquiries regarding men- tal health services each year. Many of these inquiries re- sult in direct services at one of our facilities. Each week, no-cost screening appointments are offered to assist indi- viduals in determining how to access mental health care that is most appropriate to their needs. Often our staff is able to direct people to other community resources that can most effectively meet the specific needs of those con- tacting the Agency for information or assistance. The Agency maintains a resource directory of available com- munity resources to assist individuals in finding help. Page3 West Eud Family Couuseleug Services Board Officers Chair Susan Melanson Vice Chair Lupe Perez Treasurer Jim Frost Secretary Joanne eoyajian Immediate Past President Paula Pachon Foundation President Stan Cruse Board of Directors Members Rene Biane Guy Eisenbrey Dee Hallock Tom Maginn Pat McArdle Katie Roberts Jodie D. Smith Bob Ulloa Serving our communitees Page4 ' since 1955 Chief Executive Officer's Message A YEAR OF CHALLENGES During these difficult economic times, the need for com- munity-based mental health services continues to in- crease. Despite fiscal constraints and new limits on ser- vices imposed by the Department of Behavioral Health, I am pleased to report that West End Family Counseling Services remains on the forefront of service delivery for the communities we serve. Our dedicated staff and volun- teers worked harder than ever to ensure that high stan- dards of care and service were maintained for all the peo- ple who depend on us. And we succeeded. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003, 26,224 hours of direct client services were provided. Revenue exceeded expenses and the Foundation maintained over $100,000 in cash reserves after donating $25,000 to the Agency. The Agency increased services to Spanish-speaking consum- ers and school-based services expanded. The Board made a strategic decision to discontinue providing bat- terer's treatment classes and to increase services to sur- vivors of domestic violence. Plans are proceeding to de- velop achild and family center in Rancho Cucamonga with a grand opening projected for late spring of 2004. As government reduces resources for community mental health, and needs for services conitnue to grow, our Agency is called upon to do more with less It is through hard work, dedication, and a commitmentto maintaining the highest professional standards, that the special people who work at West End Family Counseling Services con- tinue to earn the privilege of providing meaningful out- comes for the families who live and work within the many communities we serve. Jed Shafer Pnge9 West End Family Counseling Services Agency Programs Schoo%based Counse/ing School Contract Services Alta Loma School District Chaffey Joint Union High School District Cucamonga School District Etiwanda School District Mountain View School District OntariolMontclair School District The Agency provides a wide range of services for six school districts in our region. Services are provided by Agency counselors at thirty-eight public school sites Program ser- vices include short-term counseling for students at school, crisis intervention, enhanced counseling services for schools desiring customized counseling programs, in- service framing for faculty and staff, information and refer- ral services, and administrative consultation AB 2726/Children's Intensive Program The name A62726 refers to a State law mandating that mental health services be available to severely emotionally disturbed (SED) children while they are partiapating in a Special Education program at school. Our Agency provides mental health services for two County-administered class- rooms. The Children's Intensive Program offers innovative multi-family group services, specialized groups for adoles- cents, and other counseling opportunities for families ex- periencing serious challenges MKAP Progrem Making Kids A Priority provides Department of Behavioral Health funded services to families with school children en- rolled in selected schools in the West Valley. Highly-trained staff members provide family-focused treatment at schools and at our Ontario clinic. n Serving our communel~es PageB since 1955 Agency Programs Pages West End Family Counseling Services From the Board Chair MAINTAINING OUR MISSION Outreach Services Elder and Dependent Adult Outreach Our Elder and Dependent Adult Outreach Program pro- vides in-home mental health assessment services and spe- cialized training for other service providers. The Agency participates in a regional multi-disciplinary task force to coordinate and enhance comprehensive services for older and dependent adults who reside in the communities we serve. Newcomers School Outreach in collaboration with the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract, a team of the Agency's bi-lingual/bi-cultural staff members provides support groups at the Newcomers School on the Chaffey High School campus. Recent immi- grants, many of whom speak no English and have no social connections to our community, work with Agency staff to adjust to school and Iffe in our society. Collaboratives The Agency participates in the Focus West Collaborative, the Family Solutions Collaborative, and the Montclair Com- munity Collaborative. These important community partner- ships help human service providers leverage resources and share information about better ways to deliver services to the clients we share Parent Partner Program In collaboration with the County Department of Behavioral Health, our Agency was selected to provide no-cost out- reach and advocacy services to families with special needs school children residing within the West Valley region. Throughout this challenging year, our volunteer Board of Directors never lost sight of the importance of the Agency's mission to provide high-quality programs for the diverse communities West End Family Counseling serves The Board and the Agency's management team remained disciplined and focused as we worked to maintain pro- gram integrity and grow services within a balanced budget. Once again the Mount Baldy United Way found that our fine Agency exceeds expectations in all categories. This outstanding rating reflects the efforts of our Board volun- teers, the Agency's staff, and the executive management team, all of whom continue to advance the Agency's mis- sion with great skill and dedication. Last spring the Board was pleased to recognize the tenth anniversary of Jed Shafer's tenure as Chief Executive. During the first decade of Jed's leadership, the Agency has expanded services, increased revenue and cash re- serves, acquired and renovated the Ontario headquarters, and substantially increased services to diverse segments of the community. The Board recognizes the hard work and dedication of all the people who work for West End Family Counseling Services that have helped make the first decade of Jed's tenure such a success. The Board thanks Jed for his service to the Agency and we share his gratitude for the efforts of all those who contribute to the Agency's continuing prosperity and effectiveness. It is a continuing honor to serve as Board Chair for this great community resource. Susan Me/anson Serving our communities Page6 since 1955 u ' Staff Roster Jed Shafer, L C S W President and Chief Executive Officer Bryn M Hoffmann, L.C S W Assistant Director Lows F lacueo, M D Medical Director Pnscdla Sudberry Financial Sernces Coordinator Marine King Financial Sernces Specialist Penelope M Vondran Administrative Services Coordinator Jessica Ramos Client Services Supervisor Gina Ruesch Client Services Administrator Nikia Carcich AdmimstraUve Support Specialist Angel Mata Administrative Support Specialist Lisa Matthews AdminisUaUve Support Specialist Inns Trulock Bi-Lingual Administrative Support Specialist Barry Hamm Relief Receptionist S Denise Chnstensen, PhD , L C S W Tara Nowling, MA Jodi Smith, L C S W Program Coordinator Program Coordinator Program Coordinator Marty De Zeeuw, L.M.F T Cecilia Johnson, L C S W Natividad Vasquez-Silva, L.M F T Julie Hovrvmn, L M F T Luz M. Vieyra-Valadez, M S ,PPS C Senior Clinical Staff Senior Chmcal Staff Senior Clinical Staff Senior Clinical Staff Clinical Staff Cynthia Millford,L C S W Sr School-based Counseling Specialist Paige Bunch, M S School-based Counseling Specialist Elizabeth Gatt, M.S School-based Counseling Specialist Shelley Hultman, M S School-based Counseling Specialist Kristen Johnson-Phelps, M S School-based Counseling Specialist Nelly Saucedo, M.S W School-based Counseling Specialist Sara Nixon Client Services SpecialisUParent Partner Tina Pham Bi-Lingual Client Services Specialist Mubashir A Faroogi, M D Consulting Physician Niculina Tanase, M.D Consulting Physician Page 7 Wes[ End Family Couaseliag Services Agency Programs Behaviors/Hea/th Department of Behavioral Health Outpatient Services Our Agency's primary activity is providing clinic-based, outpatient counseling services to individuals, families, and groups through a contract with San Bernardino County De- partment of Behavioral Health (DBH). Under government guidelines, persons using DBH services must meet specific standards for medical necessity. DBH services are pro- vided at our Ontario facility, as well as in community loca- tions including schools, homeless shelters, and clients' homes. Each person using DBH services has a Case Coor- dinatorand aCoordinated Care Plan that is reviewed regu- larly to ensure the highest quality of care Rancho Low-cost Counseling For those individuals who do not fall within the medical ne- cessity guidelines for DBH services, the Agency offers low- costcounseling made possible through a Untied Way grant. Clients using this service receive the same high quality of care as DBH clients. Fees are based on a sliding scale with many clients paying a minimal fee. In the spring of 2003, the Agency, the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, and the Etiwanda Historical Society began a col- laborative pra~ect to restore the historic Norton Fisher House so that this fine old Victorian landmark can be used as a child and family counseling center. The Agency hopes to open this newfacility in the spring of 2004. When com- pleted, the Norton Fisher House will be the headquarters for the Agency's low-cost and school-based services. West End Family Counseling Services hati provided low cost,outpaaentcoun+ehng services since /955 The Agency currently provides over 20,000 hours of community mental health services each year from 2 cAnics, over 30 public school sues, and vanous communiq centers and facihnes For six decades, our staff has taken pnde in upholding the Agency's reputation as a place where people in distress can come for comfort, guidance, and support ;~t >f West End Family Counseling Services is a Privately Operated, Non-Profit, Publle Benefit Chanty. West End ~~ Faoni@y C®unseling Services Serving Our Communines Since 1955 A United Way Agenev Since 1956 Contract Provider Satt Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health Since 1970 e Charter Member Agetu~• California Council of Cominumt~• Mental Health Agencies West End Family Counseling Services provides high quality, affordable, innovative programs for the diverse communities the agency serves. Rancho Cucamonga 10630 Town Center (909) 980-3004 Fax (909)481-1519 Ontario Headquarters 855 North Euclid (909) 983-2020 Fax (909) 983-6847 ~t serving our communities since 1955 ~~ w . b O n ~ a- ~ b C o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ j y ~ O ~ ~ A ~ ~„ ~ n nb~ `° ° o ~ ~ 3 ~' p ~ A S~ p o ~ R o c 3 ~ . .. ~, ~ ~ ~' S ~ C O.. S ~ c ~ ~ y ~ n h~ A. n b ~ C 5 o ~ °p ~ o ~ c_, ~. Y ca ~,- o a ' n N ~ 0 .~., b0 n cp ~ '~7 ~ a ~ ~~~~' ~ ~, <~_ ~~ w ~, b ~ a ~ b . b ~" h7 ~ '~ b a ~ a. ~ n b ~ ~ A~~ soy p ~b s coo A ~ Y ~ ~ ~ y R ~ b Y ~ ='~ ~_ n o b ,. ~ ~ O tp cp t' ~ ~ ~, b ~~ ~, ~e ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ A m Z ~ ti ^ O < S~~A ~' a ~ O a ~ ~ ~ < ~^„ ~ C . b ~ ~ t'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z A Vin; b ~- ^ ~ ~: O ti t0 O H O ~ ^ n n '~ ~~ T~ ~ n d a l ty ~%, a n i .'~S m Y~ c~ ~ ° -o o Z c ~ 3 ~_ o 'y ~ C J 4 M1 ~ ~ ` O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ .~C~ o ~.s~ ~ 'i.o =_ a o a ~ ~ ~' ~ a ~ ~ , Y ti "' _ ~ ~ < ~ b Oq A 4 n A ~ 5 ti ~ O ~ ~ m ~ o n `e a. ~ ~ y ~ °~tiA~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 7~ .~, ~ O ~ A ~ ~ ~4'0~ n ctip' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~, R ~~b e Q2~os a. '\] ~ ~ ~ '~+ Q o~~~. ti ^G O ~" ~ a ~- ~ ~ o h y J ^ ~ ~. o.~ ~;~ ~ o ~ ~ < e ~ yc ` 4 5 n~ fi O ~ ~ ;? Oa r A O 3 A ~. n ~ ~ ~ 0. ~O ~ (: h v .~ ~ ~ ~ `°a ~~~~ z l Y R O 1 A n ~" ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~• ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~' 7 .~ ~ h r Y ~i Q ~ • ~ • 3 N '~ = ~ N f+~ ~ ,'' ~~ 7 ~- ~~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 11, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC -The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the Village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66 Related files Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North - Route 210 Freeway South - Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Victoria Community Plan East - Highland Avenue and Route 210 Freeway West - Future Gas Station and Fast Food, Victoria Community Plan B General Plan Designations Project Site -Neighborhood Commercial North - Route 210 Freeway South - Low-Medium Residential East - Highland Avenue and Route 210 Freeway West - Neighborhood Commercial C Site Characteristics The triangular site is bounded by Day Creek Boulevard, the 210 Freeway and Highland Avenue The site has an average grade of approximately 10 percent, sloping from north to south, and some areas have grades approaching 50 percent on existing, manufactured slopes The site has 20 feet of fall from the northwest corner of the parcel to the southwest corner of the parcel The site is constrained by the shape, and the existing topography ITEM "C" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11, 2004 • Page 2 D Parking Calculations• Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Regwred Provided Convenience 2,947 1/250 12 store Fast food 2,504 1/75 33 Totals: 45 45 BACKGROUND• On February 12, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant At the workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed protect to be highly sensitive to the neighborhood to the south, and that the protect was overbuilt. The Commission emphasized the importance of on-site circulation, the regwrement of outstanding architectural design, and the need to prevent glare on the residences to the south. In response to the Commission's comments, the applicant revised the elevations, reduced the floor area of the bwlding and designed the site with proper circulation ANALYSIS • A General The protect has been designed with a stacked stone base, a tower feature and wood trellis feature with posts mounted on stacked stone bases in the drive-thru lane Decorative concrete is used at both driveway entrances for a pedestrian connection from Highland Avenue and at the handicap parking stalls The pad elevation of the convenience store and fast food restaurant is at the lowest elevation possible in order to mirnmize the impact of the protect on the existing single-family neighborhood to the south The architecture is compatible with the shopping center and gas station under construction at the southwest and northwest corners of the intersection B Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart and Fong) reviewed the protect on January 6, 2004 At the meeting the applicant presented revised drawings, which satisfied several of the Major and Secondary Issues The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval, subject to the applicant revising the plans and scheduling the project as a Consent Calendar item at the January 20, 2004, meeting The applicant agreed to make all of the requested changes The Committee reviewed the revised project as a Consent Calendar item on January 20, 2004, and recommended approval C Grading Committee The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on January 6, 2004 The Committee recommended approval, subject to the following conditions 1) mounding shall only occur east of the east driveway in order to ensure adequate line-of- sight, 2) the frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and the slopes on the 210 Freeway eastbound onramp shall be landscaped, and 3) the bwlding pad shall be lowered to the maximum extent possible, raised only what is necessary to accomplish adequate Ca PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11, 2004 Page 3 drainage The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval D Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on January 6, 2004, and recommended approval subtect to the standard conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant Staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant Light fixtures have been designed to confine the area of tllumination to the protect site Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination to the protect site Alighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-faintly residences to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed protect The maximum foot candle illumination allowed from light standards on a protect site to an adtacent property is 5-foot candles, therefore, the protect meets the City's standard An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south The acoustical consultant concluded that there would be no impact because vehicular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, would far exceed any noise generated by the protect Staff concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed protect on January 5, 2004, at a nearby school (11 residents attended) Residents had questions about glare, traffic, the use of landscaping for screening purposes on the south side of Highland, the proposed hours of operation, the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store, and the pad elevation of the protect site The residents also had questions about the possible installation of a median on Highland Avenue and the installation of a right turn lane off Highland Avenue into the protect Staff offers the following responses to the residents concerns Pad elevation At the neighborhood meeting, several residents raised concerns about the pad elevation of the proposed convenience and fast food restaurant (1449 50) Since the neighborhood meeting, the applicant has lowered the pad to 1445 96 (3 5 feet) The pad elevation has been engineered to be as low as possible while still meeting the regwrements of drainage and containment areas as required under Water Quality Management Plan i Glare Light fixtures have been designed to confine the area of illumination to the protect site Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11, 2004 Page 4 to the protect site Alighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed protect Traffic The protect will generate a combined total of 200 two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station) The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour taps for retail land use, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The City's Traffic Engineer has informed the Planning Division that a traffic impact analysis is not required based upon the trip generation rates Median on Highland Avenue east of Day Creek Boulevard• The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the protect site and has determined that the proposed protect and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not regwre the construction of a median Right turn lane into the project from the westbound side of Highland Avenue• The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the protect site and has determined that the proposed protect and the traffic counts on Highland do not regwre the a right turn deceleration lane Landscaping for screening purposes on the south side of Highland Avenue• The Engineering Division has included a condition of approval in the attached Resolution of Approval requiring the installation of missing public improvements on the south side of Highland Avenue from the west boundary line of Tract 12046, extending east along Lots 36, 37, and 44 of said tract Improvements include a streetscape/rockscape-landscaping theme with street trees Hours of operation The applicant is requesting a 24-hour operation At the neighborhood meeting, several residents were opposed to a 24-hour operation Noise from the protect will not impact the neighborhood to the south An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south The acoustical consultant concluded that the vehicular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the protect A light study was prepared for the protect to assess the impacts of glare on the existing neighborhood to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed protect Therefore, since noise and glare will not impact the residences to the south, a request fora 24-hour operation is reasonable Sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store At the neighborhood meeting, several residents were opposed to the sale of alcoholic beverages from the convenience store because they felt that there would be enough stores nearby to purchase alcoholic beverages The protect is surrounded by a gas station with a convenience market to the west, and a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a mator grocery store that will sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption The City of Rancho Cucamonga has no regulation prohibiting or otherwise limiting the concentration of businesses selling alcoholic beverages The sale of beer and wine is allowed in the Village Commercial Distract, subtect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit The proposed Conditional Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine only for offsite consumption (Type 20 ABC license). L~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE, LLC February 11, 2004 Page 5 The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distnbution of liquor by setting limits on the different types in each Census Tract Because of a moratorium on all new licenses within San Bernardino County, a determination of public convemence will ultimately be required by the City Council, as governed by the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Council, has the greatest latitude based on local conditions and determinations A determination of Public Convenience and Necessity will be required from the City Council before beer and wine sales can commence. Staff believes that the applicant's request to include the sale beer and wine for offsite consumption to be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses and a common business practice associated with a gas station convenience store CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DG Is Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhtbd "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Exhibit "L" -Site Utilization Map - Site Plan -Conceptual Grading Plan -Conceptual Landscape Plan -Building Elevations -Trellis Elevations - Pump Canopy Elevations -Floor Plan - Roof Plan -City Monument Wall Elevations -Photometric Diagram -Design Review Comments and Action Agendas dated January and 20, 2004 Exhibit "M" -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 ~S ~ s • 4~ ~ ~~+~ ~y~ !~•' ~~~ ~ ~i~l ~ ~' !~I ICI I ~ i 0 a E a z a z w r N Q W O N w rr w r r N m ~® 1 O ~ o x ~i)r' N Q y~ ie 'R'_~. . t ~ v`i W W ~e ~ d~~f 6d8li6 df --a . ~ ..,_, LL~ ~ d WW ~ ~ I ~ ~ O N ~ C w ~~~~ 9~ ~ ! e ~ ~ W`" ~~` X111 dE"m ~ '~ ~ ep S la f 6 r?E `i J' as w z W ~~ ~! ~j1 ~ .I Iii i i ~ -' e ~ +~+g $ z= = iiiiii y~ d ' i 'i ~ d y~3g ~ `~ B 't p! i E~~ ~~ ; 9~~i~ ~~EE!"t; a~ ~~~ 1 i B ! I i~~~~~,~~~~E(~j~~~9~~9'l0~~~~~i; l~gpdifilfi gm ~ f ! d ~ i~le 3 9 60°~ '1 idif ~ ~ ~ it ~ it i~o ii d ~ i o~d ddi~~'~~dd ~ 191 ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~4~~i~! t ~ ~ d 9. N 000000000®©® ® o® ®~®®®® ~®®® oPl ~ _ o ~~ i ~i ~~'~; ~ ~~~~°~~~~ I , s . >,y a~l, ~ n ~.~~ ~ ~ ~i~;~6~6 °I~~~~~fd ,~- 1 ®~ I ®~ ~ ~ N ® 0 , 1 B9 Al ~ ° ~~1 SI I / a u i~YK! o U ~ ~~~ r J SNtlMlltl] A9 7NIdtl]SQNtlI ~~ o aavn3~noa ~•~ \ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `\ \\ ~~ ~ py ~~ b ~ 1 ~ \ ,~jy ~\ !O ~. r S2 \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~~ \~ iR~ c 1 N33?17Ad~ . ~~~-.-v.>_ ~ I~ ;r RTE _210_EASTBOUND ON-R II ~~ AMP _ `._ -_~. ~ I~ ° "ncn"- " " ~ o „ ---~, m ~ II ~ - ----~-'-- o E-3 ,/'' W '' - ~ '° ' f VAFIES ~~ ~ n - / / f ~~i ~' ~ p o n ~ ~ '~ ~ / ~I~.~ ± ~i ' i II - - _ E-1 - '~ , ~ i i E-1 -xa s=~ ,; ; '' '/ ~ y ~ ~ ___ w I ~Il~fY ~Y~ / 1 ~ - - i ~ O e 1 ~ ,, , r ~n~~.nw ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~; i ' / q ~:~_m~_ _ ~t,pw~ sal. Y ~ ~~~ y T 1 ~ } ~ NtIOR IO j ~~ y % / /'/ i ~ ~a u `_ vF ~Ol~ ~~ _- ~ , _v r ~r. ~• a •~.r ice,'' /i ~'' ' • s~~~er emsio~ v a~oa~ v ~uer~ ~~.au . rv ~~: ~ ''~ '~~ ~ ~~,~,..,~ GRADING PLAN NCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN •~~""'°~ ~ ,- - ' CO / ' PARCEL 1 AND 2 ®,~~~ o;;, r =° ~ " ~ ,/~ APN 1089-121-08 AND 1089-401-66 '" '~ ~~'/// e " .- N-2 ,~mKm,~,•, oacxooa-ao~to ~1CRMA i N-~ ll!! / !I ~_~ ve JR_ w WIR • t "I I SECTm/ N-3 ~p m'~ ~ ~ a 9 ~ ~ ~ ^M_~ a w - „ -_~.__ ~..~ gLTD11 M-2 ~~~ - ~ ~ OM_~ / I \ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ___ __~ (~ L0FYI1~ `/~ I _T / IBUIY M fftT¢N x-1 d~M ~ YM / `~~ ~~ ~--_ // \~~ ~ / ~u •a~ 161I~~YE GyNc 9aH }~ 1 ! ~ f 1VIV r~II W~IIr BECTON E-3 ve AFT. --1~____-~~_~_ MR1Eat lVL ffCTON E3 °~ w w+ 1_ 0 ~__-r. iwu IOIA~AK clam ^va 4 ~-- ~- - ~r wa~nw n[ ~`d ! BECTON E-1 _~r~ _ _ ~ IBM ~H M10mt tV{ CnpAk &ab T f® IV`1l W Y Il i~11 • I • _• - _ ~ _ ~ 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IIQi. VI 1, I 1 ~ ~ ; ~I$ a ~~'FF~ g~ 6 ,:°!. ~ ~7t`i t,~t{r :,. Oa ~r <~ z I J 1 1 x ~ I i ' n; I I 1 Iq I l ~IIF 1~ ~ I ~~I ;~ ~~ I ~~~ !! I 5 I I ! 1 ~ 1~ h I~ Fi I~ g 6 I a i ~• ii:~,E ~;.~:~ ~'=; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E 3 • ' 5 o~ '- i~ 5 = g ii c. iiii I I ~ 1 1 y~~j1 I III 1 I ~ QIII1 ~~i U F „„ II~~~~ e ~ i~ ,€~;. I I tA I ~~ g U ~ ~~ za o. a ' ~1Ff .1~ A !-• ~SIi O® ®00000~~, If:Yih 11 'Q~' ~ _ ~ ~ ~~t°t''~ Q • { ~2Q a ~~F Up ~l iill ~~~ ~~ I ~T Q Q ~~~ ~~~~ @ 1 \ \\ \ y ~ ~ p`E ~ ~ yy! Y~e~l 1~gy€l~ee ~ o ~CQI ~99g ` N W ~ O: r ~ ~ y r ~ \ \ ~ \ S a _ N \ U N k a ~ z ~ ~~ i ' ~` ~ • ~':~ ~` ~` _ g -- i I ~ °z ~ ^ A . ; . ~ . . mow!. .` ~~ . . ~ w N "~~~ ``~ \` \ W e yy •. J • ~ 1 ~ ~ ~\ ~\ ~ ` \ ~ ~~ ~ s~ ` ~. ~ .~ ~ ~~ .` ~ \ ~~ ~ ` ~ ~ R \ ~, ~~ 9 6 % ,, ro ~` ~~ ~ R ~ ~ ,1 ` `\ `\ \ 1 . ~ 1 1 .: ` \ ~ . • ..~ \ \ ~~l '~ tt t` X111 ~ \ `~ `' ~\ 4 tt I . . .. , 9NtWAb •lfi ltiN304NY[• t •I I i o ,~, e ~ .I i I _~ ~ i ~ ------------------~33a~i.dd-- ____aavn3~noa ~ I ----------- _ ., T-~ - do - ..~~ k~ rr~~-• ~f VM~_ ' Wr d _ ... ~ ~~ ~~ ` ! l : - II s •® i'1 WEST ELEVATION LYC a/~M1~ d ';'. ^ EAST ELEVATION scar. a/u•-,~d ~ .... ~ ~ o..~a.,..,ed.,. .,..s ~ ..~. n. ~ e.... CONVENIENCE STORE FASTF000 RESTAURANT (JITB) SERVICE STATION BUILDING LONG ELEVATIONS A-2.1 ,a .. u °_ _ n+m • v u ~ e e e ~ . `aa~lf ;+s.r cs Z N ~ ~ N a 0 0 ~ e9=a1. '~E; ~ LL~ ~ ~ ~ :,i~~T~ a ~(1 w w y~ ~ ~~et ~ w ~ = iiiiii m .,: ~. 2 ~_;_! `~ ~~o ~~~ ~ ~ m ~ il~ ,'i,9• !' ~~ __ i .; ~; i .,E~ '; ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~. _~ ~~- i of d , ~ ~ ~1. i i , ; i i ~ ~ '~ .~ ~ i ~~ ~ -.,F I~~ I I ~ I i ~ ~g ~,' ~ ~ '~; ~, ~v C\'~ ~, ~ e e ~ ~ ~ o e a e c e ~ s ~ 1~ •i ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ i ~ j H 1 ~ ~ i ~ ` ~ I~ i I S ~ I I ~ ~ ~ , ~~ I~ ! f ~ t o ~, ~~. !1 TRELLIS PLAN . \ . .i •I -- - -- '°° i __ ~ i .,~.. ~ ~ i iW ' ~ i ~ ~ ~. i ~...~ i ~__ i ____i ELE Luc r rl DETAIL 1 rrc r-~ -e' ELEVATION 2 YNL t/f-~d r1 DETAIL 2 ~~ SOUTH EAST ELEVA710N O / / / / / I / /J / / / cl II DISPENSER FRONT ELEVATION O SOUTH VEST EIE~ATION O BIB DI6Lf3A9"" ~•_ B7 ~...~~.... p. ~~.... p.~~.... o______ o mp,.-_ o aa~w- 8~~._ aaa~• c ~T~TEB~ ~,:. r^imr •o-.r.w.~.~.r " ~^ o ®eu+ c~s eR.ny a wrs CONVENIENCE STORE FASTFOOD RESTAURANT (JITB) SERVICE STATION CANOPY '- A ~3 n.w SIDE ELEVATION V_LOLUMNS O SIDE ELEVATIDN_ND LW U~MN O DISPENSER 6 LIGHTING PLAN O (ETAIL ~O ~ e y n i ~ [ .~ d - ~ - 7 ' z o / ~ ~ y A ;~asi~ ef==E. i . ~ - w Q r N ~ OP1H o 6 .~. I- ~ ~ LLu W z d I ~ ~ ~ o N ~~ s~ ' ' 1 i f!3 ~~~ -~`l~ i ~ ~ " ~ ' ~ 13 '~ ~, V m Q 4 ~ , ~ Yg p W~ ,11 1 111 .: I I • `.' ~ - oho ~~~ °~ i t I , ~ 2 gq a - L a, O O y I b~ . ~-1.ae~~zT ~~i 1 C~~ a o ~ < ., ., - I ~ I ; ; I L-J I I I 1 I I I I I I I I ~II ~ ~ I I II I I II II II ® ^ I I I I H V~IIII sl~l ill p ® ~ I I I II 11 p I ~ I I II II ® ~ I 1 ~ , I I II _ II I I ~~ ® I r ~ ® ~ I : ~- 1 ~ y I I I ~ f , I i I e I _ I ~ 1® --' I - r- I I ~ ~ I I ) I ) ~ I I r~ I r~ _ - ~_ ~ I r I I I 4 ~ 7 I I r- ~ ~ ~ - - I I I _ _ r ~ ~ _J I I ^ ~~ lll' I ~~ I ~ 1 I L_ 1 i ~~ ~ I I I I I I ~L I i i~ x .~ , -----------' u~. --------- - - J \ ~_ ~ ~• _ ~ r~.=_. _. - --- _- ~ I :, ;s __ ~ 7 ® ~~~ -~m ' .r=- N ~i .~ ~ R0~ e... ,~.•.~-r Z Zp~ a o-cxns.r. ~• _ to i LETTERING GENERAL NOTES c~ fa.o6 k t ^~' ~ .r ~& * f t~ ~ dM d d. ~ IF ~, IF cm Loco ~ ~ LEGEND nC b nw [ .•4./r.T D ~ ' ~ e a..<. Nae ..c oar M..~ M wa. iaun.oo•ss e....<...... ®~r_ CONVENIENCE STORE FASTFOOD RESTAURANT (JITB) SERVICE STATION I WA SECTIONS AND DETAILS • 4~, ~ DHC 200100638 ANO RPW 2(p201425 _-, - AS-6 '" ~ _ nam s . • .. a .a u v u v n u ~1 ri 1' N GMONGe "^ SOUTHWES T CORNER NDNUMENi SIGN WALL ELEVATION 13 ~~ NOTHWEBT CORNER MONUMENT SIGN WALL ElEVATIpJ 12 ,-(') +n+ 3 . •. ... ~ ~ f ~ T..." •u. O o .~ n 4 ~ O .. V' s .i.e.. w.e ` Y .. -. i uu..~e .n.. ~w~ ...,. : . rceu rm. r. mr ...... . .ua.. ~mn Q e~na ~ ~ u MPJOfl SIGN WALL SECTION ) BATTEflEO COBBLESTONE WALL SECTION 3 Y Y Y 4 b Y b Y Y Y Y L Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b b Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y EAS ••~~_k~ Y T gOl~ID1UN-RAMP Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ST~TFb R TE 210 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y b b y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y b Y Y Y b Y Y 4 b Y 4 b Y Y Y Y 1 / "C Y Y Y Y L Y b Y b• , Y Y Y 1 b Y Y Y /\ Y b (\ °Y Y b b Y b Y Y + 1 W Y W Y b Y Y Y Y ~ Y~ ' Y Y Y W • Y Y • Y Y W b b Y W L W ~ b Y Y b Y L Y W Y ]~ O ~ Y Y Y W ~ Y Y W Y W ~ I ~ W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~~ ~ Y Y V Y 1 Y b W 4 Y Y W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~ Y Y Y Y Y b 1 W W W Y r W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FLAT LENS Y Y Y 1 Y ` W Y W * W Y Y 4 Y Y Y b Y Y b Y Y ~ W W • ~ W Y Y Y b Y b Y Y Y b Y Y Y ENCORE Y Y Y Y Y ~ w ® vM Y b Y Y 4 W b W W b YY ~~ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b y ~ 4 Y W • W W Y 4 pd 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y W Y W 4 Y Y b Y b Y W W b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y 1 Y Y 1 Y Y C 1 Y { J Y U 4 1 4 4 L Y b b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y / Y Y R~ Y W W W Y V,9 Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b ~ Y 4 W Y Y 1 Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y / Y Y Y Y W ~ W W Y Y Y aY Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y CHALLENGER Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y b Y Y b b Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y 4 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y 4 Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y b Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y L Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YYITN4p f001G14C YµV6 AT OIMI. V4p 1 lS YM11O1MIQ IK IUI w~~~ i ~~~~K~~ ~-r~I~~~w~~~~r•w 1~ mossy DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Donald Granger January 6, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719- PACIFIC GLOBE LLC -The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the Village Commeraal District, located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66 Related files Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064 Background On February 12, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant At the workshop, the Commission directed the applicant to modify the proposed protect to be highly sensitive to the neighborhood to the south, and that the project was overbuilt The Commission emphasized the importance of good on-site arculation, the regwrement of outstanding architectural design, and the need to prevent glare on the residences to the south In response to the Commission's comments, the applicant has scaled down the square footages of the bwldings and designed the site with good arculation Design Parameters The project site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, on a triangular parcel created by the realignment of Highland Avenue and the 210 Freeway The site has an average grade of approximately 10 percent, sloping from north to south, and some areas have grades approaching 50 percent on existing, manufactured slopes The site has 20 feet of fall from the northwest corner of the parcel to the southwest comer of the parcel The site is constrained by the shape, and the existing topography The project has been designed with a stacked stone base, tower feature and wood trellis feature with posts mounted on stacked stone bases in the drive-thru lane Decorative concrete is used at both driveway entrances, for a pedestrian connection and at the Handicap parking stall Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Grading of the protect is critical to minimize the impact on the existing single-family homes to the south The proposed pad of the gas station and convemence store is approximately 2 to 9 feet higher than the Highland Avenue street elevation The proposed pad should be lowered several feet and be elevated only what is necessary to accomplish adequate drainage The applicant should revise the grading design to minimize the impact of the protect, even if retaining walls are necessary The battered, tapered architectural wall planes are typical and create awkward geometry in the form of the bwlding Staff does not encourage the uses of battered wall planes Strong consideration should be given to eliminating the battered wall planes and using traditional shapes that fit with overall bwlding form At the east elevation, the tower feature has an extensive amount of vertical wall plane that is void of enhancement The tower feature should be redesigned, with elements that provide variation, such as arches or porticos ~'~ ~~ oao ~~~~~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC January 6, 2004 Page 2 All aluminum awnings should be eliminated on the west and east elevations, and replaced with suspended, large-member, decorative wood trellis that protects from the wall plane a minimum of 2 '/2 feet The south and north elevations should receive some additional architectural enhancement, such as suspended wood trellis, quatrefoils, or accent file framed by a contrasting stucco surround Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design issues 1 Additional stacked stone should be added to the convenience store/fast food budding The 2-foot high stacked stone base is too small to provide a materials contrast from the stucco wall plane The stacked base should be raised to a minimum height of 3'/2 feet On the east elevation, stacked stone should be added to completely cover the trapezoidal wall plane over the entrance to Jack in Box 2 Colored concrete and enhanced paving should be used at the following locations • Colored terracotta concrete should be used under the pump island • Eliminate stamped concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection and replace with colored concrete with score lines 3 The six columns supporting the pump island canopy should have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap, thereby matching the architecture of the convenience store and fast food restaurant Stacked stone should extend from the base of columns up to a minimum of S feet 4 The columns supporting the wood trellis should be enlarged in order to make a greater architectural statement and presence Staff suggests the following dimensions 2 feet by 2 feet base with stacked stone carried to the bottom of the posts, and 12 inches by 12 inches wood posts 5 The monument signs should blend into the grades and berms Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion 1 The protect will regwre review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program 2 Undulating berms in the landscaped setback areas shall be provided to provided to create to visual interest and to screen parking areas 3 Ail lighting, whether mounted on the budding or on freestanding poles, shall be designed a confine the light canopy to the site boundaries 4 All lighting, whether mounted on the building or on freestanding poles, shall be architecturally compatible with the building design 5 The protect shall conform to the Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan and shall have 10-foot sidewalk, matching the protects to the north and south Cap DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC January 6, 2004 • Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee prior to being scheduled for Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action• Members Present Cnstine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Donald Granger At the meeting the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mator and Secondary Issues The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval with the following conditions The proposed pad shall be lowered several feet and be elevated only what is necessary to accomplish adequate drainage The battered, tapered architectural wall planes shall be eliminated and replaced with square wall planes 3 At the east elevation, the tower feature shall include an arch The Committee supported the revision made by the applicant, but indicated the tower need additional enhancement, such as accent tde framed by a stucco surround 4 All aluminum awnings shall be eliminated on the east and west elevations and replaced with suspended, large-member, decorative wood trellis that protects from the wall plane a minimum of 2 Yz feet If necessary, the wood trellis shall be suspended by wood, not cables 5 The south and north elevations shall rECeive additional architectural enhancement, in the form of score lines, matching the east elevation 6 Additional stacked stone shall be added to the convenience store/fast food building The stacked base should be raised to a minimum height of 3 '/z feet On the east elevation, stacked stone shall be added to completely cover the wall plane over the entrance to Jack in Box Black concrete shall be used under the pump island The stamped concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection shall be eliminated and replaced with colored concrete with score Imes 6 The six columns supporting the pump island canopy shall have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap, thereby, matching the architecture of the convenience store and fast food restaurant Stacked stone shall extend from the base of the columns up a minimum of 8 feet 9 The columns supporting the wood trellis shall be enlarged in order to make a greater architectural statement and presence The following dimensions shall be used 2 by 2-foot base with stacked stone carried to the bottom of the posts and 12 by 12-inch wood posts 10 The monument signs shall blend into the grades and berms Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 11 All cornices shall have finished ends and wrap around where the wall plane returns 90 degrees Caa. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC January 6, 2004 Page 4 12 The pumps island canopy shall have a mansard roof with file 13 The project will have a decorative concrete and a plaza, matching the protect at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that the project be scheduled for review on Consent Calendar at the January 20, 2004, Design Review Meeting The applicant agreed to make the requested changes Ca3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • CONSENT CALENDAR 7 00 P.M Donald Granger January 20, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 - PACIFIC GLOBE LLC. -The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the Village Commercial Distract, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089-121-08 and 1089-401-66 Related files Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre- Application Review DRC2003-00064 At the January 6, 2004, DRC meeting the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mator and Secondary Issues The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommend approval with conditions (see attached action comments). The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that the protect be scheduled for review on Consent Calendar at the January 20, 2004 Design Review Meeting The applicant agreed to make the requested changes REVISED PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission L Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Cnstine McPhail, Rich Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Donald Granger At the meeting, staff presented revised drawings, which satisfied the Mator, Secondary, and additional issues the Design Review Committee raised at its January 6, 2004, meeting The Committee reviewed the protect and recommend approval C~ y ' pty of Ranciro Cucamonga Planning Omswn tgosl an-2rso M ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or punt clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one Ime ro the next Ime.J The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components_of the proposed project sothat the City may,review the project pursuantto`City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines;~-~the~"Califor`nia~rEndironmental Quality-Act; and`~tFie~„,Cit~'s'-Rules and Proceiiu~s~toIrnplemenb.CEWA:~ It is important~tfiat the infonrriatiori ~eguested~in tFi•is applicator °b'exproavided~in~full=:`=-. _ ~ ~ ~_ : ; _ .w,°- `~, .,:'_.- " ~;~,._= __ ~Tl`=.=:'':;: _ .., _N Appl~cabon Number /or the pro/ed to which this /orm pertains Pro/ect T7tle ~AC~sFi G ~ Name 8 Address o/pro/ect owner(s) ~/a G'/~i L ~Loa~t-G Z~ /639 ~acr,/!GC ~Lyl7. U7L.4~a ~'A ~/7£rC Name B Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor ~.a Bi Fib ~ oT7.a c L ~ ~ _ Contact Person 8 Address '-/~~'e~ /~f~/•/Fi~ ~~ 733 ~ . !"7/}~•J s i Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (If different Jrom above) r I.s'.arc /1 .r C'o,..~n~r `y~sesa.J °• 'M Telephone Number EnvironmentallntoFormi doc _700 Page 1 of 9 ~~ ~ Created on 5/22!2002 4 09 PM INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d rs the responslbrlAy of the applicant to ensure mat the applicaGOn rs complete at the hme o/ submittal, City stall will not be evadable to peAorm work required to prowde mrssrng m/ormaGOn .~ •- ~ • - ~ Information indicated by an astensk () is not required o/non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundanes 2) ~ews into antd from the site fromhthehpnmary access poaMs that serve the site, and presentative views of nd west, significant features from the site InGude a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (descnbe): _~ fps ~aQN~,e pr ~c//~',r/`.0./O ~~£ - 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet i/necessary) /oY9- Z/-O -O o `5) Gross Site Area (adsq R.)• / y 7 9 Z A Cecs ~ ~f '1r/7 s o c r 'S) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications). / `/7 92 lleeE.s ~6'! N5~7 so ~'r 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach addrt~onal sheet it necessary) 8) Include a descnpt~on o/all permits which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to /ully implement the pro/ect. ~p~,.rY r3cThr : roo,ib cSs,P r ~ r Qe t'~ET = lJr+~tQ ,PocwD ~'vcc sysr~~? 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of signnc~ant features descnbed In addition, cite ail sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traf(c studies) £ cS/TL ~j7.iT er OG° O .•~ ~'r •vae /'7( C~'.rT ~?e~,c.~rCR r i ps A--,J c9v/,e Sr iX/L21~ F2fccrn / rs 7YJ 'T!!E _ •~ r'3/ ./fwLY ,Sr/rcT .Srl7C.//rAC TO % NG ~S o~T+t ..i,ri ^ - Pa9e 2 0(9 C p`,Q Created on 5!22/2002 4 09 PM EnvironmentallnfoForml doc . • A ~ ./o ~~//Cr7i~CS d~.4i.Cc„'TJ2C'S ~?0/ST~...~ Otif j 1~£~.r~,2vr`~ £r7 s~i£ 3tor"t /J~ i~.Par~EeTS~ ~s .c~o~- . `z// LS'oyT7lQleSr ~ri7 .(~i~+oy.J QN~RC/~/L ~a 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or histoncal aspects of the site Crle all sources o/in/ormabon (books, published reports and ore! history) o i cS/TZ' 11) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect fhe site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon of the site in terms of uWmate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate d there an; proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wrth each phase, and the anhcipated completion of each increment Attach add~bonal sheet(s) d necessary •-- U Page 3 of 9 Crealetl on srlu[uv~ q uy rm EnvironmentallntoForml doc • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any culfural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-faintly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.). ~}'.2 O QEEW P . S.~N i-E Ti.. Ec.~za7~ENTCA~L ~~-~ VYii-. rlLP^~l~ A l: 14) Will the proposed pro/ect change the paftem, scale or character of fhe surrounding general area of the prolect7 i o i7lf ~o iv-f ~- 15) Indicate the type oI short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How will these noise levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed? n ' L S r(/f3S l~ff"~ ,t~i'ff~JVCfJ rho.-i 7J7rE ~,ev~E'G'/"_ •16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains v .~c~z aY Sock li `i Tt ~ O G7/4T/!7~ Page 4 of 9 EnwronmentallnfoForml doc Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 18) Indicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dfstnct at 987-2591 u a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaVmm/ac) 19) Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer It septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests It discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dfstnct at 987-2591 a Resfdenbal(gaUday) b CommercfaVlndustnal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resfdenbal unds Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether unds are rental or for sale unds) i 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) to Rent (per month) $ to 22) Speci/y number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household size by and type EnvironmentallnfoForm7 doc c~ Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wilt be residing within the pro/ect Contact fhe appropnate School Drstncts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior Hrgh c Senior Hrgh COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercrat, rndustnal or rnstrlubonal uses S'f<F SP•edE X45 cSrai/D./ L//TA' G°- s i aet 1¢^~fJ ~/43'f Coen ,Zfs-j~i/Z,c..~i d//.-s/ L7ie/dE T//.e// 26) Total Moor area o/ commeroral, rndustnal, or rnstituhonal uses by type' f-AS fool) Z ZfrZ sgcr G~-s-oQ.£ Z 'low as 3=r_ 27) Indicate hours of operation 2~' ~OV zS - 28) Number o/employees Tatal ~~ Maximum Shdt r~ Time of Maximum Shift g/~-i-"t T ~M - 29) Provide breakdown o/anbcipated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o/the rate o/hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary). ~A.4/~/E.2S r/1sf Caoi~ dil~<~S/lES /arl~ Mrl...ne: E.e `//1(~'CS .tf7wJ/i~ ~.2oM frJiNi//Url !/R~^f i d /~~ r~~G A~iQ_ 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the ~ D City `31) For commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) `y~l,QyiT % U O~fe/l7-G W ZL CAL A S,i7,ni./t/~ ~.ed~"l -T.t'L fz Q ~/ /~ ~/s/i .s/ .v/~~ ,ate ~yocra-TPo Y~~av4~9 . ,4,/ E~//!idEl~../C/ 9rv~/ /~-,2orr 7'1,/L 9i1~YOV,•/r~ p F -Z1.P~~- ~u/ ~?or~osf~ i~/~'ou~l~ ~G/L /1i~~1lBiET/d./ ~.c~OG~e.pJ Page 6 of 9 G~~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM Environmentalln(oFonnl doc ALLALL P~ JECTS 32) pro de adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~clf so, please mdf ate thef eresponseed to determine thefr abddy to oe~-riolf' OTi/te iv0 G- ~fr-~ ~m...~Tfo >~-•- r~/~s Ti~E . 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matena/s include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o(any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/ use, d known ' e/ _ ~~ ~s 34) Wdl the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic be used and proposed method o~d sposal The location o~ such uses, alongrwdh the storage end shipment e2asals to shall be shown and labeled on the application plans L L ~y,2or~GL51 9i~-Tiar/ ~/~'~ QJ/ _ ~~ Tom,/,~s /},/~ ~,~ od/~L~ y~,a.cG ~~~E~- w' Est-r.ESmc ~L,o~rrs .4~. ~f/O'~ `~oci ~~ ~',e-r~~.,.G `lBrrIP1' ~s/ CK~C' OF 6eit.t'~J~i~ -.QLG ~alL a//~ /3t ~'o..ir~•~'t/> L'rJ T1l! JfC~N~i-fir/ cS{/.fTC/'7- 1 hereby certdy that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for tot he best of mytknowledge anfd belief el~urther undersitand that add do etl information maybe requ rod to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 7 /7 ~ 3 Signature Title /f/Al./~ P-T~ ,Q/~~UGf/F'r/~T i c~~. Page 7 of 9 Created on 5122/2002 4 09 PM EnvironmeniallnfoForml doc DRC2003-00719 LOCATION MAP ~~ '~~ ~I '~auuim . , , , ~ I I II I I i I i i I ~ ; - , I , , ~ Z\ o ~wI ' I , Ilil w I I ~ ~ i ~ri~ g I ;~ ~ ~~ ~~ I , . I ~ ~, ' ~ ~~. ~ N I I f, I I i' - L I I I i ROGEO ~~ ,I I I ~ ~ I I ~~ ~5~~~~I .-= i I s '~y"~y I_ ;i . of I '~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I i -~ -, ~ I -~&LK ONC, ~, ~i I ~ . . fIRETMGPN li MGRNING GLGRV I I ~' 1 ~ ' I'I 1 ~ a_ I -- i~7i I - ~ i_- 1 ~ ~_ ~ S _ Iz_ - , ~ + I I ~ GGVE TREE ~~ - I ~ ~ -j ;~ ' r I { ~ ,' '- I ESU ~ I I ~ I ( t I Iq I- '0 I ~ H1CKlESERRY , p v ' I I I '~ ill I li I I ~. ,I I Ili, I I .3 , I i~ i ,I ~• I I I , i , d„~ 'I~ ~ I ~ I ,' ~g~ ~ uuc I~l ~~ ~~ ~}! I - ~ TNISIlE 'h 'I rLtgp,,,,,. I ,~ o ~ , ~ ~~' - I IM' I~Tii ^~~IO I ~ I, ,I I ,' , ~~, ,I .I ,I I,'' , II ~,,, GA19Y tl~ s IANTANR I~ i,1 III I I,i I ` AUNT , ~ ~' m, t ,~ `I ~• - BLUE MISIT I i i ~ I I~ •I I~ _.,r_gN`n'~ ~' l s B~"" MGNGATE ~ ~ ~, , III ! I 1, 1 A I ~ ~ , I 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles i 6°0°'" N 5°0730" )' •,~ ROAD CLASSIFICATION .~ssoti9 Hearyduty- Light duty. s~'~ Medium duty Unimproved dut ~_____--- Interstate Route ~ U S Route O State Route CALIF • _ CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF RL/~-`'~~L~- ~`-~ll_FRINT NE /40NTARI015 QUADRANGLE QUADRANGLE LDCAiION 4GG` 1 't ~'`A t FG 34117-B5-TF-024 1"7 Rlv~..;','E, CA 92501 Revisions shown In purple and woodland compiled gam 1966 ~f i ., r,8~-05 ~0 aerial pholopiaphs taken 1985 and other sourced a ~2~ PHOTOREVISED 1988 Parlul Cluck by U.5 Forst Sainte Map edited 1988 // MA 2452 II NE-SERIES V895 0 2 1t~ r ~' J ~~' I N i City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Protect File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00063 and Pre-Application Review DRC2003-00064 3. Description of Project: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC - The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land in the village Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089-121-08 and 1089- 401-66 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Pacrfic Globe LLC 1639 W Foothill Boulevard Upland, CA 91786 Contact Tony Dehbozorgi 5. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial 6. Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The 1 48 acre site is bordered by the 210 freeway eastbound onramp to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Highland Avenue to the south and east The site is presently occupied by invasive weeds, and no structures occupy the site To south and east, across Highland Avenue, is an existing single-family subdivision To west, across Day Creek Boulevard, a gas station/convenience store with fast food that are under construction To the southwest is a neighborhood shopping center, including a grocery store, that is under construction 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number. Donald Granger (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report. EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Av Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a °Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or °Less Than Significant Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) gesthetics ()Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources O Public Services O Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions m the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain tc be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared By ~- ~ ~^"~~ Reviewed By Date December 22, 2003 Date ~2~7 D3 ~~ Rev 7/22/03 ~`-'° EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () Q (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adlacent to the prolect site The site is within the Day Creek Boulevard view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 Although the site is located within a view corridor, the buildings will be setback 51 feet from Day Creek Boulevard and 47 feet from Highland Avenue, which exceed the minimum setbacks The bwlding and canopy will be under the 25-foot height limit The buildings, site design and landscape palette will not obstruct wews of the north-south Day Creek Boulevard scenic corridor The impact is considered less than significant b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buldings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The 1 48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest To the north is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards requre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site Alighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the existing single-family residences to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed prolect The maximum foot candle illumination allowed from light standards on a prolect site to an adlacent property is 5 toot candles, therefore the prolect meets the City's standard The impact is considered less than significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract V J~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less roan Spnifiwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenbally Sipnificani won Mibpebon may Sipnihcam No 1 act Iran rete0 1 act I C c) Involve other changes in the existing environment O O O (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The 1 48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest To the north Is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third Is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubttul, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR Identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prcposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The 1 48 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest To the north is the 210 Freeway and eastbound onramp The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 mile to the southeast Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (Including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () () concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Rev 7/22/03 "" `'~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less man $ipnNCant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Falenfielly Sipnincanl wnn Mnipauon Than Sipnificam No I atl OCO fetetl 'dCl 1 2M Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surroundrng area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site2haqul roads. Rev 7/22/03 C `~ ` Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 ~~ ~,~ 9gmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fatenaally Sipnd¢ant wan Mitipaean man Sigtuhrant No I ace Inca ted I att I act • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWaCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,a would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect bases to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide Increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result In slgnlflcant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) Ail industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. L_~ Rev 7/22/03 Cy0 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less loan Sigrvhcent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aelam~auy S,gnil¢ant wan tNUpaaon Than Signhcant Na I acl Inco tad I am I C 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the Cdy Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prolect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated J d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, prolects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, prolects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The prolect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor single family residences Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O O O (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service Rev 7/22/03 C"~\ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Lass 711an Siprvhrant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotanaellr Sigrvficant w~tn MitlpaGOn man Siprvhrant No 1 act Irm retatl I ecl I c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation ptan~ Comments• a) The protect site is located in an area developed with single-family residences to the south and east, and future commercial to the west and southwest The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments, hence, is void of any significant vegetation According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments, hence, is void of any significant vegetation The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments, hence, is void of any significant vegetation There are no heritage trees or mature trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur L J Rev 7/22/03 ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Si9n~ficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenaelly Siprvhrant Wrth Mnipaoon Than 9pnhcant No I act Into ted I act 1 ect 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rev 7/22/03 Cy`~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sipruhcant Lass Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Sipruficant won MNpation man SiOnlhwnt No I act loco red I an I act sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvwm, which would have been deposited dunng the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age° and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvwm per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure, 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving l) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (/) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction ro) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) Rev 7/22/03 ~~_\ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than 9gnA¢ant La55 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PofenLally Significant won MNgaaon roan Signhcent No 1 R Into ate0 I C I an c) Be located on a geologic unit or soli that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments• a) No known faults pass through the srte and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 7 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fautt Zone lies approximately 2 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M„ 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 7 5 northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 10 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Although the site is located within the buried/uncertain segment of the Red Hill Fault, mitigation and special studies are only required for cntical facilities since subsurface investigations have not yielded evidence of its existence Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~q emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMig emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction ~~ 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~q emissions from the site during such episodes CAS Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Then 90nihcent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially SIQnIflCant vino FLapaaon man Sipnihcent No 1 act Into retetl I ect 1 act 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) Indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Soboba stony loamy sand, with slopes ranging from 2 to 9 percent, according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 Soboba stony loamy sand soils usually have slow runoff, and the hazard of erosion is minimal No adverse Impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Soboba stony loamy sand, with slopes ranging from 2 to 9 percent, according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 Soboba stony loamy sand soils usually have slow runoff, and the hazard of erosion is minimal No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would fhe protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area ~~t u Rev 7/22/03 • Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 LASS Than SiOmf¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pae"Dally SiBnificent w"" Mlapaa°O Tn°" Significant No I act Inco rated I act I an g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands~ Comments• a) The protect will involve the transport and use disposal of hazardous materials (automobile gasoline and motor oils) The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect does include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within a Yz mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, with the required safety precautions and applicable budding and fire codes, the proposed gas station and fast food uses do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated The protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport Land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated i) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Cdy's westerly limits No impact is anticipated s g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Rev 7/22/03 `''-\~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Lass Then Spnificent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g rrnem~a~ly Sipnihcant w~tn Miopehon man Significant No I ecl Intro retetl I act I an Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or oft-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that u Rev 7/22/03 ~- \~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less man sipnihcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially S~gnihwnt wnn IMUgaLOn man S~grutirant No I act Inco teE I tt 1 act estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect well not deplete groundwater supplies, nor well it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented Lys Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Leas man .SIBNbCanl ~6aa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Falanaally Si9nficanf wan Abbpabon Than S,Bruficant No I Into lad I an 1 en 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an Integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system Includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected t) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan ~~ J Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than &pnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pclemially Sipruhcent wan Miapaaon man SiBmficant No 1 an Inco ratetl I an I act Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south, and future commercial development to the west and southwest To the north is the 210 freeway and eastbound onramp This protect will be of similar design and size to planned commercial development at the northwest and southwest corners of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue The architecture, landscape design and site design will minimize the impacts of noise and glare on the adtacent neighborhood to the south The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Village Commercial The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated a c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area according to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR The protect site was previously graded when the 210 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard on ramp was constructed As such, the site does not presently contain any significant vegetation Therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use piano Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE Would the pro/ect result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect Rev 7/22/03 C~\ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less man SipruGCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g 1=oteneally S,puhcent wnn MNgaoon man Siprnftarlt No I act Inro tetl I C 1 atl d) A substantial temporary or periodic mcrease in ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect O (/) O ( ) e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect wdhm the wcindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The City's Development Code requires that all commercial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, therefore no adverse impact is anticipated on employees or customers of the protect An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south The acoustical consultant concluded that a detailed noise is not needed because the vehiclular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the protect A noise consultant also evaluated the traffic noise impacts to the interior dining area and recommended the following mitigation measures listed below wil I 1) The building shall be constructed with insulation in the walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the restaurant area The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted CSa L • Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Lass Tnan Sipn,M1Cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potanaally S~gmhcant With Mnipauon Than SignifiWnt No I act Inco rete0 I act I act The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect An acoustical consultant evaluated the site the determine the impacts of the proposed gas station and drive-thru facility on the existing neighborhood to the south The acoustical consultant concluded that a detailed noise is not needed because the vehiclular traffic on the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue would exceed any noise generated by the protect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan anti is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housmg, O O O (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating O O O (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments. a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited Rev 7/22/03 ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Lela Than SiBniM1Canf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially SBnihcant W,ih Mibpaban Tnan Significant No 1 act Into tee I act I eh number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The project site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service mhos, response times or other performance obfectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protectioM O O O (~) c) Schools O O O (~) d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other public faalibes~ O O O (~) Comments• a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, will be served by a fire station located approximately 1 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The project will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated ] L_J d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3/4 of a mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the Rev 7/22/03 C~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 less Than Signifitam Leu Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PManfially SiBnihcenf Wilh Mrtiganon Than S~gmficanf No 1 aq Into retetl I d I cf construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or O O O (~) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 of a mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlrRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at rntersections)~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks C~ Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less man Sipnifirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Futanaallr $ipruhcant wnn M,tipaaon men $ipnihGent No I act Into tetl I ael 1 act d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parkrng capacity O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate a combined total of 200 two-way, peak hour trips for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station) The amount of two-way trips is less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantialincrease in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated ~S~ ~~ Rev 7/22/03 L _J Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Lass man Spmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenvally Spnihcant With Mihpahon Than Sipnihcant No I act IncO retatl I act I ac( g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the prolect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Requre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing factlities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result m a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are antiapated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signficant C,S"~' Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Sign,hcenl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Sigmhcent With MNgation Then Sigmhcam No I h Inca retetl I t I an d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct water system Under Senate BIII 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or hawng more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) Industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or Industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use protect Including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and 8) any protect that accounts for an Increase of 10 percent or more In the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment Is required when 1) a protect that Is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more In the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision The Clty has determined that the protect does not meet one of the regwrements, therefore, a Water Supply Assessment Is not regwred The protect Is served by the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct water system There Is currently a sufficient water supply available to the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No Impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect Is served by the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within Clty of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No Impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The Clty of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated CSC Rev 7/22/03 Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less men Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pbtenbaliy Sipmficenl WM MNpebon Than $ipnifiCani No 1 en Into Ietl I en I n 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once Rev 7/22/03 ~~ \ Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable Iegai standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Letter from Ellwyn Erickson & Associates, Community Noise Assessments (dated September 11, 2003) (/) Light Study/Photometric Diagram (dated December 18, 2003) ~~ Rev 7/22/03 u i Initial Study for DRC2003-00719 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the prolect described In this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the prolect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no slgnlf ant envl ental effects would occur ~~tEUa~~R 2 p o .~ Applicant's Signature Date Print Name and Title ~; i \planning\final\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003.00719is doc ~~~ Rev 7/22/03 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negatwe Declaration is being circulated for public review rn accordance with the Callfornra Environmental Oualrty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719 Public Review Period Closes: February 11, 2004 Project Name. Pacific 76 Project Applicant: Pacific Globe, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the village Commeraal District, at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue - APN 1089-121-OS and 1089-401-66 Project Description: The development of a 2,947 square foot gas station and convenience store and a 2,504 square foot fast food restaurant on 1 48 acres of land FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negatwe Declaration based upon the following finding. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period February 11 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2003-00719 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially sigrnficant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wtll take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planrnng Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~.51~ Mitigation Monitoring Program . DRC2003-00719 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Form wdl be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requmng long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdmdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits i \plannmgVmal\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-00719mmp doc ~~~ . RESOLUTION NO 04-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO DRC2003-00719, FOR A GAS STATION WITH PUMP ISLAND CANOPY, AND A SINGLE BUILDING CONTAINING A 2,947 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE AND 2,504 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON 1 48 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1089-121-08 AND 1089-401-66 A Rectals 1 PaGfic Globe LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00719, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subbed Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 5th day of January 2004, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting, attended by 11 residents, to present the proposed probed and obtain community feedback 3 On the 11th day of February 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng • on that date 4 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detennined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on February 11, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherNnth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, with a total street frontage of approximately 893 feet and an average lot depth of approximately 150 feet, which is presently unimproved, and b The property to the north and east of the subfect site is the Route 210 Freeway, the property to the south is developed with single-family homes within the Vidona Community Plan, and the property to the west has an approved entitlement for a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant, and c The application proposes the construction of a gas station, convenience store and fast food restaurant with a dnve-thru lane, a Conditionally Permitted Use within the Vidona Community Plan, and C~.4~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 2 d The proposed building elevations exhibit a high level of archdectural design, incorporating stacked stone, score Imes, a tower feature, and decorative pavement, and The proposed protect has adequate off-street parking for all proposed uses, and f The proposed project has been designed vwth a pad elevation that is as low as possible, given the site constraints and engineenng tolerances regwred, in order to minimize the impacts of the protect on the existing single-family residences to the south g The existing grade of the project site sits higher than the adtoinmg public streets The proposed project grading scheme has been designed with a pad elevation of 1445 96 The pad elevation has been engineered to be as low as possible while still meeting the requirements of drainage and containment areas as regwred under Water Quality Management Plan h The protect design includes light fixtures designed to confine the area of illumination to the protect site Under the pump island canopy, lighting will be recessed, and will confine the area of illumination to the project site Alighting study was prepared to assess the impact of glare on the ewstmg single-family residences to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed protect i The protect will generate a combined total of 200, two-way, peak hour tnps for all three uses (fast food, convenience store and gas station) The amount of two-way tnps is less than • 1,000, two-way peak hour tnps for retail land use, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) cntena for requinng a traffic impact analysis ~ The City's Traffic Engineer determined a localized traffic impact analysis is not regwred based upon the tnp generation rates The City's Traffic Engineer has evaluated the protect site and has determined that the proposed protect and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant the construction of a median on Highland Avenue east of Day Creek Boulevard The Cdys Traffic Engineer has also evaluated the protect design and determined that the proposed prated and the traffic counts on Highland Avenue do not warrant a nght turn deceleration lane from the westbound side of Highland Avenue k The application contemplates a 24-hour operation, 7 days a week An acoustical consultant evaluated the site to detennine the impacts of the proposed gas station and dnve-thru faality on the existing neighborhood to the south The acoustical consultant concluded that there would be no adverse impact to surrounding homes because vehicular traffic noise from the 210 Freeway, Day Creek Boulevard, and Highland Avenue would far exceed any noise generated by the protect Alight study was prepared for the protect to assess the impacts of glare on the existing neighborhood to the south According to the light study, all residential lots to the south will have 0-foot candle illumination from the proposed protect I The application contemplates the sale of alcoholic beverages at the convenience store The sale of beer and wine is allowed in the Village Commercial Distnd, subtect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, in accordance with the zoning regulations of the Vidona Community Plan The proposed Conditional Use Permit application contemplates the sale of beer and wine only for offsite consumption (Type 20 ABC license) The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulates the distnbution of liquor by setting limits on the different types in each Census Tract Because of a moratonum on all new licenses within San Bernardino County, a determination of public convenience will ultimately be required by the City Council, as governed by ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 3 the provisions of Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code The legislation purposefully left the term "public convenience or necessity" undefined so that the local legislative body, the City Counal, has the greatest latitude based on local conditions and determinations The sale of beer and wine for offsite consumption is a common business practice assoGated vmih a gas station convenience store The protect is surrounded by a gas station with convenience market to the west, and a neighborhood shopping center anchored by a mator grocery store that will sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the meeting, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations C~ ` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0422 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 4 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) The project shall be developed in accordance with plans approved by the January 20, 2004, Design Review Committee meeting 2) The proposed bwlding pad shall be at an elevation of 1445 96 3) The bartered, tapered architectural wall planes shall be eliminated and replaced with square wall planes 4) At the east elevation, the tower feature shall mGude an arch and accent tde framed by foam trim 5) All aluminum awnings shall be eliminated on the east and west elevations and replaced with suspended, large-member, decorative wood trellis that protects from the wall plane a minimum of 2 1/2 feet If necessary, the wood trellis shall be suspended by wood, not cables Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 6) The south and north elevations shall receive additional architectural enhancement, m the form of score Imes, matching the east elevation 7) Additional stacked stone shall be added to the convenience store/fast food building The stacked base shall be of 3 1/2 feet On the east elevation, stacked stone shall be added to completely cover the wall plane over the entrance to the Jack m the Box restaurant 8) Black concrete shall be used under the pump island The concrete at the driveways and at the pedestrian connection shall be colored concrete with score Imes 9) The six columns supporting the pump island canopy shall have a stacked stone, and a decorative cap Stacked stone shall extend from the base of the columns up 8 feet 10) The columns supporting the wood trellis shall be large size timber The following dimensions shall be used 24-rnch base with stacked stone tamed to the bottom of the posts Posts shall be 12 inches by 12 inches Beams shall be 5 1/8 inches by 18 inches and trellis members shall be 4 inches by 10 inches 11) The monument signs shall blend into the grades and berms Final design shall be subtect to Gty Planner review and approval 12) All cornices shall have finished ends and wrap around where the wall plane returns 90 degrees The back side of raised architectural features on the parapet shall have decorative com~ces ~~ Q~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 5 13) The pump island canopy shall have a mansard roof with tile, and lighting under the pump island canopy shall be recessed 14) The protect v~nll have a plaza with decorative concrete, matching the protect at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue (DRC2001-00638) Final design of the plaza shall be subtect to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval The traffic signal controller box shall be relocated by the developer to either side of the entry monument sign The final location of the box shall be approved by the Gty Planner and City Engineer The budding plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the plaza area with decorative concrete 15) Berming within the landscape setback shall only occur east of the east dnveway in order to ensure adequate line-of-sight, therefore, pariang lots shall be screened by a combination of low decorative screen walls and continuous hedgerow 16) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance vnth the Day Creek Boulevard ScenidRecreation Comdor Master Plan, including, but not limited to, tree species and spacing, decorative hardscepe, and a 10.foot wide concrete Community Trail 17) The frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and the slopes on the 210 Freeway eastbound onramp shall be landscaped according to the approved landscape design by Caltrans 18) The sidewalk along Highland Avenue shall terminate at the pedestnan connection west of the westerly dnveway 19) No outdoor dining area, customer seating or tables, is permiried because of parlang limitations 20) No extenor neon lighting is allowed, except within a sign canister or inside individual channelized letters Enraineennp Diwsion 1) Day Creek Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with the Day Creek Boulevard SceniGRecreation Comdor Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the following a) Provide decorative street lighting and street trees b) Pnvately maintained landscaping shall match the adjacent landscape maintenance distnct to the south and conform to the Day Creek Boulevard Beautification Master Plan plant palette c) No dnveways shall be constructed on Day Creek Boulevard frontage ~_ \ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 6 d) Protect in place and replace/repair, as needed, the existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, stnping and signage, including R26(s) "No Stopping" signs 2) Highland Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with "Collectof' standards, including, but not limited to, the following a) Provde ultimate curb and gurier, street trees, streetlights and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide property-line adtacent sidewalk from comer of Day Creek and Highland Avenue to the pedestnan access c) Protect or replace existing R26(s) "No Stopping" signs Provide ultimate traffic stnping and signage, as regwred d) Stnpe a 260.foot dedicated left tum lane for westbound traffic approaching Day Creek Boulevard e) Stnpe an 80.foot left tum lane for eastbound traffic at proposed easterly dnveway with a 90.foot transition between this left tum lane and the lane in 2 d as noted above f) West dnve approach shall be nght tum only 3) Right-of-way on the north side of Highland Avenue shall allow a standard Collector Street parkway, 11 feet measured from the face of curt 4) City entry monument wall and comer treatment shall be consistent wdh the one approved for the northwest comer of Highland Avenue and Day Creek Provide wall maintenance and sidewalk easement encompassing pedestnan areas accessible to the general public 5) Developer shall complete the missing public improvements on the south side of Highland Avenue from the west boundary line of Tract 12046 extending east along Lots 36, 37, and 44 of said tract Improvements mGude streetscape/rockscape-landscaping theme wdh street trees 6) Secure a highway planting improvement agreement v~nth Caltrans to landscape along the 210 Freeway on ramp and to provide for maintenance service and expenses in accordance with Caltrans regwrements 7) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages Toes of slopes shall be located outside the dnveway lines of sight Speaal pavement treatments in dnveways shall be located outside the public nght-of--way C~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 7 8) Pnor to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable dat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Drv~sion when the first budding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division wnthm 60 days follownng the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect Police Department 1) Install and maintain a secunty camera for the convenience store in accordance vnth Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 9 28 020 (Ordinance No 548, 1995) Environmental Mmpation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and pro/ected equipment use Construction contractors shall prowde evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads l~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 8 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to mirnmize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance vwth local ordinances and use sound engrneenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed overto adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of yearof construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high vends (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance vnth Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altematrve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use 10) All industnal and commercial facilities shall post signs requmng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , m excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industnal and commercial faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas 1~..~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 9 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be requred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 14) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate themtal pane windows and weather-stnppmg Cu/tu2/ Resoun;es 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Hell retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actroities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspec~al qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with ongmai tllustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mtigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow . the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has c~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 10 completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain preGpitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (VVQMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharges Identification Number) shall be ~-`~y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 11 submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) The bwlding shall be constructed with insulation in the walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the restaurant area 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planrnng Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Macias, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary C-r'~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-22 DRC2003-00719 -PACIFIC GLOBE LLC February 11, 2004 Page 12 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS i s ~~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project Ffle No.: DRC2003-00719 Applicant: Pacific Globe LLC Initial Study Prepared by: __Donald Granger, Assistant Planner Date: August 13, 2003 .. .. -. .. Av Quality -R . n-~~, ~~~at, ti , All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venhcahon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern Calrforrna Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shail include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throu h seedin and waterin • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 X~ 1 of 6 -. .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Schedule actiw4es to mirnm¢e the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn radices Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Review of Plans A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , CE C Review of Plans A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 re wrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional ' Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , m excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools r_ 2 0~ .. , -. .. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conddionmg, appliances and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C y4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 sites from demoldion or significant moddicaLOn without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 archaeolo ical herita e Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of Report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin s 3 of 6 • .. . • A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of Report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide spec~fm recommendations regarding further mitigation measures Q e , paleontological mondonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and CP B RewewofReport A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunn the interval of earth-disturbm actvities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D RewewofReport D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils - . ' ~>`~~ s'%~=' `-' ` The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes r r C 4 0~ .. .. -. .. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactwe construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ,~ Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, dwersions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise The building shall be constructed with insulation in the BO/CP C During A 4 walls and ceilings, plus double pane windows in the Construction restaurant area ~ V 5 of 6 Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday BO C During Construction A .. 4 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Sald consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings L' Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Vergfcetinri ,- SencUOns CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Constmction C -Plan Check 3 • W ithhold Certificate of Occupancy 80 -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 • Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fue Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citation 6 O~ • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00719 SUBJECT: GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE AND FAST FOOD RESTAURANT APPLICANT: PACIFIC GLOBE LLC LOCATION: NEC OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: * A. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-22, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-10-03 t ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 Comolehon Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and -/-/- State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~-/- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for -/-/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all -/-/- other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved -/-/- bythe City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and -/-/- the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be -/-/- located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, andlor landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, -/-/- including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property -/-/- homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may bemanufactured -/-/- products Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, -/-/- free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City -/-/- Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) -/-/- b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to -/-/- include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins -/-/~ d Roll-up doors -/-/- SC-10-03 2 ~~~ e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids . f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis Protect No DRC2003-00719 Completion Date / / -/~- Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from wew 3 Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 00 a m and 7 00 p m only 4 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 5 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and to no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -Ail commercial acttwties shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 d6 during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB durng the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, bwldtng materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise speafied herein, to a manner which would cause a Horse disturbance to a residential area 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation atsie, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 8 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, bwldtng lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot fighting fixtures E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldtng plans For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ . recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards SC-10-03 3 C O~ _/-/. -/-/- / / ~~. -/~- -/-/- / / ~-/- -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / -/-/- Protect No DRC2003-00719 ComoleUOn Date 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet G. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bulding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Division B Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Dav Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue / / / / -/-~. _/_/~ / / / / / / / / / / _/_/~ SC-10-03 4 C~b~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 Comoletion Date 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All wails shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and vrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~_/_ Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval /_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits J. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following /_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report " ' " ' /_/_ signature are required prior to plan check submittal wet s stamp and s/Engineer Architect SC-10-03 5 ~ u~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the Ctty prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fenang and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Division L. Site Development - 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/~_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/ counter) ~ M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected to accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/~ time of application for grading plan check SC-10-03 6 ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, . submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal Is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Clwl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access .P 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) Varies total feet on Highland Avenue Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 4 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements requred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Islantl Bike Trail Other Day Creek Boulevard X X Highland Avenue X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, priorto final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first ~-~- -~-~. ~-~- _/_/_ -/~- / / / / -~-~- / / / / SC-10-03 7 C,.,n~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 Comoletlon Date Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, tees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the Cltys street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze' Oty Day Creek Boulevard Washingtonia Mexican Fan 4' 25' O C 15' Mln FIII Master Plan robusta' Palm B r n or In 'can be located 5' match est heights from 5ireet light Pyrys callerana Aristocrat 4' 25' O C 'Aristocrat' Pear Staggered rows on alternate sitles of walk Intortnal Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gal populneus Background where room Highland Avenue Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle 3' 20' O C 24" Box Indica Hybrid-Pink 'Muskogeel' -~-~- / / / / -~-~ / / / /_ -~ / • -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 8 ~ \v Protect No DRC2003-00719 Completion Date 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sublect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Diwsion 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 7 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way Day Creek _/_/_ Boulevard and the 210 eastbound on ramp Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan for Day Creek Boulevard 2 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Distracts shall be filled with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, ~_/_ telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilihes as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Bwlding permit issuance will be sublect to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agences for work within their right of-way Caltrans _/_/_ 2 Anon-retundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance rf no map is involved SC-10-03 9 ~ `~ Protect No DRC2003-00719 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwidings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures V. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All roof openings groing access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed W. Windows Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars X. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet m length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Completion Date / / _/~_ ~ ~ / / / / _/_/_ -~-~~ -~-~- S~_,o.03 ,o C~a RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Standard Conditions November 20, 2003 LHE Platte, LLC Pacific Globe, LLC 12340 Highland Convenience Store, Service Station and Fast Food Restaurant. DRC2003-00719 The applicant must submit to Fire Construction Services a Fire flow letter from CCWD when submitting for building plan check. FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS The following items are listed only as information to the applicant regarding procedures and requirements as thev relate to this oroiect. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fue hydrants in commerciaVindustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved lire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft e Fue hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regwred by the Fve Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire Distract to control a fire C°~3 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building Contact the Fire Construction Services Unit at 909-477-2713 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The requred fire flow for this prolect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Please see "Water Availability' attachment for required verification of fire flow availability for the proposed prolect Contact the Fire Construction Services Und (909) 477-2713 3 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this prolect is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 4 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed prolect may be used to provide the required fire flow sublect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fve flow Contact the Fire Construction Services UnR (909) 477-2713 5 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requved fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fue hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, sublect to standard spacing and distribution requirements Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed m any of the following i Group A Occupancies Contact the Fve Construction Services Unit (909) 477-2713 FSC-4 Fire Distract Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Location of Access. All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 2 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet ~~ cry b The inside turn radws shall be 24-feet c The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any prwate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 26-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the droving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 3 Fire Lane Identffication. All regwred red curbing and signage shall identify fire lanes A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard FSC-5 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or bwlding construction As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Dmsion for specific information Note• Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 Operate a place of public assembly 2 Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use) Rancho Cucamonga Fire Code prohibits storage of flammable and combustible liquids rn outside aboveground storage tanks 3 Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceedrng 100 gallons aggregate capacrty) On a scaled site plan show the occupancy or use of all buildings wrthrn a 3rz mile radius Storage exceedrng 100 gallons aggregate capacrty rs not permitted wrthrn F mile of residential areas 4 Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation FSC-6 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dwision at (909) 387-8412 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the Crty from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fue, Hazardous Materials Diwsion at (909) 386-8412 for forms and assistance CAS FSC-8 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fve protection systems and/or any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the prclect Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing 5 Combustible Construction Letter- Required letter: Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or drroeway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to Fire Construction Services 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit• Plans for the requred automatic fue sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Frre Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 i ~ \~ L_J 5 Sprinkler Monitorang The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Mondoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire Suppression System• Plans and specifications for the lire suppression system for the protection of commeraal-type cooking egwpment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 7 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 8 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 9 Address- Other Than Single-family: New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 12-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 10 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Service Construction Services Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 11 Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- County Review The plans for flammable or hazardous liquid storage tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Divis~onlfank Program Contact County Fue Dept at (909) 386-8407 12 Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- Fire District Review: The plans for hazardous or flammable liquid storage tanks shall also be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division Contact RC Fire Dept at (909) 477-2770 13 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 386-8412 14 Submittal to the Fve Distract: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs Contact Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 15 Risk Management Plan The applicant must demonstrate that the facility has met or is meeting all Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements if regulated substances are to be handled at the facility Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 387-8412 16 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fue District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bulding or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 C°~`~" T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAM ONGA Staff Report DATE Februrary 11, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Llsa Kuschel, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 3 33 acres of land Into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Ciellto Street - APN 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 and 37 Related Flle Tree . Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A Project Density 5 3 dwelling units per acre. B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Resldentlal (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low-Medium Resldentlal (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Low-Medium Residential North - Low-Medium Residential South - Low-Medium Residential East - Low Residential West - Low-Medium Residential D Site Characteristics The 3 33-acre site is located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Ciellto Street The site slopes southerly at approximately 3 percent and contains three homes that are proposed for demolition A row of five Palm trees currently located within the right-of-way will be relocated throughout the site to be made part of a future landscape palette Other existing vegetation consists of one Pine tree, two windrow trees, four mature Juniper bushes, and several other large bushes, which will remain at this time Lemon and orange trees are also found at the southern portion of the site ITEM "D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The protect proposes the subdivision of 16 single-family lots The protect is a subdivision only, with no home product proposed at this time The proposed lots range from 5,004 to 9,816 square feet in size and are substantially larger than the Hamilton Ranch neighborhood that abuts the profect's west and north boundaries. The average lot size is 6,393 square feet (6,000 sq ft required in the Low-Medium Residential District) and is consistent with neighborhoods to the south and east The subdivision proposes a new private street to be accessed by Beryl Street that terminates into a cul-de-sac Other public improvements include pavement widening, sidewalk, and curb/gutter along the property frontage The developer is deferring installation of perimeter block walls until the homes are constructed B Design Review Committee On December 16, 2003, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval The Committee indicated any minor exception or variance requests for reduced setbacks for future house products would not be supported given the "tight" layout for some of the lots C Technical and Grading Review Committees The Technical and Grading Committees . reviewed the protect and recommended approval subfect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval D Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365 A tree survey prepared by a landscape architect (David Evans & Associates, December 8, 2004) revealed a total of 1 B trees satisfy at least one criteria of the City's criteria for heritage trees Of these 18 trees, 12 trees are m poor health/form and are recommended to be removed, 4 are m good health/form and are recommended to be relocated, and 2 are in very good health/form and are recommended to be protected if possible The remaining trees on site are frwt or WaInuUPecan trees, which are not considered heritage trees and are proposed to be removed The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused within the protect landscaping Staff recommends a condition of approval consistent with the landscape architect's recommendation to preserve in place the Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11), if possible, by using curb adfacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wall around the tree drip Ime If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees could be removed and replaced The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced E Neighborhood Meeting On November 20, 2003, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the protect There were 12 residents m attendance All attendees appeared agreeable with the protect Only matters regarding the timeline of the proposed street improvements and type of development allowed on the property were of concern F Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II It was determined the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on Short-term air quality and dust during site grading, Cultural resources if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, Biological in terms of tree removal, Hydrology and Water Quality, and noise during construction oa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES . February 11, 2004 Page 3 The mitigations listed m the Initial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impacts to less than significant CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were matled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Tract Map SUBTT16644 and Tree Removal Permit attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Declaration Planning Commission approve Tentative DRC2003-01040 through adoption of the and issuance of a Mitigated Negatroe Respectfully submitted, Bra Iler City Planner BB LS/Is Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Grading Plan with Sections Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Design Rewew Committee Comments dated December 16, 2003 Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 03 ' n ~~ I~ SITE UTILIZATION PLAN Tentative Map No. 16644 PDRilOf150F 1018 8 ARD P UI BLO(X 180FTIQ CL1GAgN(aA HOIESTFM ASSOCIATION W THE COIA+iI' OF 8AN BERNARpNO STATE aF CALIPORNM AS PER PLAT RECORDED W BODIle OF 11AP5 PACE 4S REWR0.5 OP SPID COUNTY 600' RADIUS LINE NAMLLTp1 SIRPET WWI~TON STREET ' ~ ~ t• ~ , ' ` / ` , , ~ ` / ` / ~ / 1SDM01ETLE BiRFET N ` -- ` TAACf RD -rru ~ rs _ ra tnp~n ~ R~ ' ' -- vnLDPtowEr+ " Dburr ~ ~ = n F ~S~ s ' ~~ i1 r1 rP, 1 _ ~ P f9 ~ TRAVELER ~~ I T~~RUOD Dg1yE ~ , e- - - -Tr ~ - ~ i . ~ ., '; ~~ ' ra to p _ TM 1884{ ~C , ~+ I AVKON STREE T S , _^ X _ 555 PAAOD. 1. P8 N0. S8U ~ - _ _ 1 Prn n/r~m I . ,.~ - - _ u VEfWE DRP/E I ~ , ` °' TRACT RD rzew ra LsWo-az : e ~' - / A~.courrr S uc p ° ~ MOME VISU __ ~ ~ zg~ b p54 S } S rrr jjj ~ . _ __ _ ~ ` ~ , ` ' CELf fO 81RL£f ~ =BTREEf I _ pEIRO - STREET N • ~FF ji? j ~~a x eia a yi fie fi~~ ~~i~Q ~'fs~. ~~;f.m ~~,f_. ~~af x q ; ~~RT f:k ~yST F~ #:$ ~t59 pe; ia; IaEe 9?(E# filiigl 7°~a ~¢af ai iEl-t igfi! 3~f~t ~~ fi ~ 3 J ~~ Z ~ 0~ 1.1.. 0 '^ z v C W F- U Z O U ` . ___ ~' ~~ A S a ~ ~ @@ fi ax.i:5 as gyyg ~ FO p & ~, ery e E sF~~F&G i =~~~i § ~ i S~ gg E9E gg R 9 ~9 S~dG€~S eJ sai#5E9 82 ~ p 0 cE i • R ~ Ri. A B - ~ c5 ~~si >>a p a; Y Y F g ~ 4 ~ifg# €~fps ~#f~ s ~ i s -- R _' P ~: ~ ~. <_ ~ '. f~ $ '- S 'Rt iiiii99xixxax9ai i fi: ARSR.SRCRRaiRRS+ a t ~y~G`'Ra:a99R.iRR9RRRi a F5'k 3$3i'4i`-.i9iiE6°9~ ~ °4' ~.... ,_~__ Y fife c 0 ~ jI S ~ O c e t3 i c7 mm n f° -~__ jt :i ifi ~ .°' s F - w~ j °' i __~ 5 ~fi +~:,3f ~# e° ~ wfi j a 1~ f 9r !# '€ ~ <~ e ~., ii fa ~~ gi i R9 } 4 6 101-00~/$ll 6 rv Z/9C~ ON lOVtll { j~ i~l~,,_,~ + 3 `_, _ rte= ._ . iT" YiY~ ~'° ~' r `~ - i y ° `i 4 f a p i p ±`I rv ~I 6`; ~ ~w~ ~° ~ 2S ~ ~_ ~~r ~ p ~, o z~ Z" ~- I ,1.~ p? .m a~ ~ i , ' a ~ i- 9 '--- °-° I rr ~ i j f _ ~ r~ ~~ 1 i i~' d T f ~ i ~e ms' ( 1 r10Ni ~ ; t r i' j ~ 85-LS/9ll 8 rv j ' # ' ~' ry 4 ~ I_i-~ i i I~ i i - ! _,~ _- [CSC ON lOVill 1 t 1 ~ `- - ~ ~A~, ~ P ~ - T ' ~~- '- ~ ~ x j ~ ~ ,~ # i - 1 •, ~j ~ ~ ' ~ ~ p ~ p i~ q ~ ~ i ^ #8 tt n i~ ` m i .u ~ ~~ ;, y ~ { o \ _ ~ tY.nm Z m ,, ,a ,.i' 6 9 , i is-~~ _y~ ,fi t ____~n ,/ :4c ! ~~ = ! ~ a !y [ x~1 f7:ifli n f~, i,c` ij _ 1 + ~ i i ~ 1 ,.«` ~ Yg ,•: j,• fi a 5i W m, °--~~ .. ~€ .; eg ~3 e m :9 Shy pFpC E3 5g ~~_ Z G ~.~..g /_ Q W 1~ i~ pp ~~?~ i~{,z `p{9a~E S? Edee BB3/[61 ~9r~E~ Z~~~A [~f!n ~~ 3 [E~ @ • Y ~ A' X plc s- ~ aE ~a laaa ~~ P~ b! E{ 9E ¢ : E F F ab i@? R? R 89Sea: ~3e _ !n Y q ~ 4 p o d~( i~ a k F § `~a bS~' Or se aS~' 'pr ~ ~~ § EY~~ [~I gad!{ csee~~~aa €~€~ ~See~S~aa •99Qpb €~~yS~"S~pr§'S [~~~~ ~ @@§~ ~~ p. @@§es q~ EE"rP EgSPae 4aa 9a~aa e~EBeCS,~ £ s9a~~' e~°Sape~~~ i~~~ es¢a~~~~~ E °e $$ Caep-i ge S .£a Cbe- ge 45s~ YS9 ~~§a. W Eg~~~Y 5€~~3q~V pq~~~ ~ ~68 ~~4~~ y~y1~ ~cp 9~ ~yB~~Y g~~a~ G~~i'f8"SE r 2a~0 ~~4gF~gbL QppQf §€£~cSY7~'b~€i c S. F~ pp ;;a![~- brag pS•YgaT[~- ~~5~ 9gSn @~S~g ~S~~S~~ $!'nYt~[e~ ~ e°~~~ =~2~$g;~ ie~e8~ c[~9gQY~~.5'SE n '~ `_§C ~ A§€=a€yG'5]FS~Cay~G~ ~ S~SS~ ~§€~y€p a~a A~~¢¢~~ G~~6~~~`3~9~ '~ S2ab38e AgEgiG]C SI.!' Ag~~4~S@b S. 6r 5 4 101-001/$I$ B rv Zs9fl ON PvtLL 85-CS/9ll 8 rv f{5f ON lOViN { S1 ~u { SIBS f { t ~ 3 ° ° _ ____ _ ~~ ~_ -_- ~s _ ~ -- -~ ie .b3e ~~ ^ ~c _ - _ _ t i e Oe b -e ~ ae i ~ ~ °l ' ' ~ S a ~ ~;q ''a. ' ~ b 1 I M1, sa 6d ~ °9 f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t nrv ~ 1331 LL6 •Y '. II ' c ~ t a b~'9 ~ ~ ~ Z n ~ ~ ~ vv B I ' •~ o z ~ i ~ on v. y` a S ~n f ~ 1 1 a~ ~ ~ r ° F ` ^~ ~ ~~ `~~d~ e. p a ~` ° f O ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ ' ° ~ a " - ! - .£ ~F ~~ -- C ~ ~ '~ ~ i ~~ i iS~~ . g ~ p / ~ ~ t t i ~~ t y ~b - -- a:m awe sw~ 1 ~__ 1-- ^ -- ~ i ~~ #4 ysy; dyye fi4 ~p 5~ 9 c+ 9 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 P M Lisa Kuschel December 16, 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. The proposed subdvision of a 3 33 acre property into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN 0202-751-36, 0202-741-64, 0202-751-37 Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 Design Parameters The property slopes from north to south at a 3 percent slope and contains three homes that are proposed for demolition None of these homes appear to be historic A row of five Palm trees currently located within the right-of-way will be relocated throughout the site to be made as part of a future landscape palette Other existing vegetation consists of one Pine tree, two windrow trees, four mature Jumper bushes, and several other large bushes of which will remain at this time Lemon and orange trees are also found at the southern portion of the property Each of the 16 proposed lots complies with the minimum lot size (5,000 square feet) and minimum parcel width (50 feet average) required in the Low-Medum Residential Distract section of the Municipal Code No homes are proposed at this time The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on November 20, 2004, in which all attendees appeared agreeable with the protect Oniy matters regarding the timeline of the proposed street improvements and type of development allowed on the property were of concern Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Although the proposed subdivision meets the minimum net average of 6,000 square feet for Low-Medium Residential zone, more than 50 percent of the lots are less than 5,500 square feet Lots 2 and 6 are lust a bit above 5,000 square feet Lot 11 is constrained by 2 to 1 slopes and the regwred 15-foot flat usable yard Most of the larger lots are at the end of the cul-de-sac, however, are barely at the minimum 30-foot lot width standard Staff believes that there is room to adfust the lot lines of several larger lots so as to even out the size of the smaller lots Secondary Issues Once all of the mafor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues A retaining wall as high as 8 feet (at Lot 2) with a 5-foot high screen fence on top is being proposed along the south property boundary Minor Exception and/or Variance would be needed concurrent with any formal Development Review application for homes The applicant should work with the Grading Committee to reduce the height of the retaining wall Decorative material such as block with stucco, split face, and pilasters should be used for the wall . 2 The site contains a variety of trees that are proposed for removal, except some Palm trees that may be relocated to the parkway along Beryl Avenue An arborist report has not been M submitted yet U j~ Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be t'y/\ incorporated into the project design without discussion D~- DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES December 16, 2003 Page 2 The corner side yard wall shall set back 5 feet from the property Ime Recommendation Staff recommends that revised plans be submitted for Design Review Committee review under the Consent Calendar Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Pam Stewart, Cnstme McPhail, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Lisa Kuschel The Committee recommended approval of the subdivision The Committee stated that several lots are tight and that they would not support Minor Exception or Variance for setbacks for future house products The applicant acknowledged • L~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOV 2 0 2003 RECEIVED -PLANNING i ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the appl~cahon is complete at the hme o/ submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information Appl~cahon Number for the protect to which this form pertains Protect TTM # 16644, 16 Lat Tentatwe Trail Map Title # 16644 Name & Address of proled Phyllis 1 Brown, 6882 Beryl APN0202-741-64 owner(s) Michael S Sarrail, Heather S Gibbs, 6898 Beryl APN 0202-741-84 Jeffrey and Racquet Yamada 6928 Beryl APN0202-751-37 Name 8 Address of developer orpro/ect Charles Joseph Associates sponsor 10681 Foothill Blvd Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person 8 Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates Address 10681 Foothill Blvd Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone (909) 481-1822 Number Name 8 Add2ss o/person preparing this form (if different from above) Same as above Informahon indicated 6y astensk (J rs not requued of nonconstmcbon CUPS unless otherwise 2quested by staff '1) Provide a full scale (8-12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project sde, and indicate the sde boundanes 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representatwe wews into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the sde from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and rnprosentabve wews of srgnficant features from the site Include a map showing /ocahon of each photograph See attached 3) ProlectLocahon (descnbe) West side of Beryl Street, South of 19"' Street 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addrbonal sheet dnecessary) 0202-751-36, 0202-741-64 and, 0202-751-37 5) Gmss Sde Area (arJsq tt) 3 332 6) Net Sde An;a (total sde size minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cat~ons) 2 997 acres 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would aliect the pro/ect sde (attach adddional sheet d necessary None 8)Include a descnpt~on of all permits which wdl be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes rn order to fully implement the protect No permds needed at this hme, only Tentative Tract Map and Final Map Approvals ~~~ 9) Descnbe the physical setting o/the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features descnbed In addition, site all sources of information (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheolog~cal surveys, treffic studies) 0202-751-366696 eeM St Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9~701Single Family Residence See photo Survey 0202-741-64- 6862 BeM St Alta Loma, CA 91701 Family Residence See photo Survey 0202-751-37- Single 6928 BeM St Atta Loma, CA 9~701Single Family Residence See photo Survey Thee are a row of palm bees along Beryl that will be relocated within the site as part of the landscape palette throughout The site There are (1) pine tree, (2) windrow trees, (2) non-descnbe shrub bushes that have overgrown to look like trees (4) large funiper bushes, and (5) palm trees that will be relocated There are a number of dead and dying bees in Rearport~on of the propertes with some that have been partal chopped down as firewood There am venous crops Such as dying coin, fruit trees such as lemon and orange on the southern most property as well s 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects of the site Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known cultural or histoncal aspects of these sites 11) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Existing noise sources will not have an adverse impact on proposed uses, see attached noise study ~~ 12) Describe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms ofulhmate use which will result from the posed protect Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each incmment Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary The proposed proled is a 16/ot Tentative Tract Map, and wdl be consistent with the existing land use designation for this property 13)Descnbe the surrounding propertes, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (msidential, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The proposed project will provide for rosidential development that is consistent with the City's approved land use for this property There are no know historical significance to the site North is Low Medium rosidenhal, West is Low Medium residential, East is Low residential, South is Low Medium residential No building heights larger than 2 story '~~ 14)Will the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character o/the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ Minor changes that occur will be in conformance with the existing approved land use designation for this property • v\d 15) Indicate the type of short-term and longterm noise to be generated, including source and amount How will ttiese noise levels affect ad/acent properties and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing am proposed ShoR term construction noise, with constmchon act~wty that complies with City Building Permit n:quirements 16) Indicate proposed removals and/or 2placements of mature or scenic trees Applicable Tree Removal Pennrts v~nll be filed and protect vall be consistent wdh City Landscape requirements 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams WA 18)Indicate expected amount of waterusage (See Attachment A forusage eshmates) For furtherdanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaVday) 11.280 Peak use (gaUDay) 22.560 h CommeraaUlnd (gaVday/ac) Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank_x_ Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is pmposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987- 2591 a Residential (gaVday) 4 320 b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units 16 lots Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot srze Minimum 5,039 thru Maximum of 10,637 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) WA ~~ 21)Anhcipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ TBD to $TBD Rent (per month) S to 22) Specrly number of bednwms by unit type 23) Indicate anbcrpated household srze by unrt TBD type 24)Indreate the expelled number o/school children who will be resd~ng wrthm the pm/ect Contact the appropnate School Orstncts as shown rn Attachment 8 a Elementary 7 2 b Junior High 3 3 c Senior High 3 2 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and mafor function(s) of commercal, rndustnal or insMuhonal uses WA 26) Total floor area of commercial, rndustnal, or rnsMuhonal uses by type N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Number of employees Total N/A Maximum Shdt Time o(Maximum Shdt 29) Provide breakdown of anhapated/ob c/assficahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an md~cahon of the rate of hrn; for each Gassrficahon (attach addrtronal sheet d necessary) wA 30) Eshmahon of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside m the N/A City 31)For commeraal and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air polluhon emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) WA ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pm/ect~ If so, please indicate their response All Agencies contacted have indicated then abrl~ty to provide services to the site p~S 33)In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenalsv Examples o/ hazanfous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB 5, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbiades, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please I~st the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known Not applicable 34)Will the proposed protect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not l~mded to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The /ocahon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment auras, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans No I hereby cerMy that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluahon o/this pm/act to the best o(my abilRy, that the facts, statements, and informahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional in/ormation maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluahon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamong~ Date October. 21 2003 Signature Title Chuck Buauet Charles Joseph Assoaates D~~e 30' aaoo i+__ Iti `I r ~~~ ~~ U~ 1/a _ ` Wfs~ ____ __ Yi _ ~ _ ` _ '\ ~C - - _ _ • iI II .~ ~ E 7 • II eo o i a2oo n 0` b 1 FZO u '~ ^,a n •4b-_ _ __ __ J ~ __ -. - ___R T ;i / Ii 3180 • • • -- -- - n Waler _ t •~ oo „I • ater 1 ~ Tan I u' _ I II \ II . ~ I ~ • ROAO I I ' :! ' E_ G • ~ • •••• TanN ~° - , I. „ W - v79 : ~ _ _ ~ ~ = Q - • y : ~; a . _ ~ 4 - ~ _ . ...... •e c ri ' u n II i I~ i .•.E ~ TanN 1 ~_~ ••3~ .. ° ~ a_ - I I' Flooe •• R U i - BE 51 n• • __-----_~ _ I] I6~9 •• I s/ n78 ~ I N • it ~ Y ~° m .~ ^ Tanks J i°;•:: i i ~ I . l a.. oWel as ~.l~i: i' • i • • U • ::: = .... .0 .~ . • •• a •. f l ~ . I6<2 .• f ~ __ ____ ____ _•________ Ff r, _ s« I r i rsio m~ GRANT • 00 ` m ' - 1 • ~l za OJ ^ y~ -. n ~ , a9v{y.d i ~~ { ~ ` c V ]5 /~65 T ~ i<5< - • 230000 FEET \ \ r ~ ~ ~ • ~ _ ,~~ \ ~>~ , IM ~ ~ . ~ ~~° - _ o I D F 0'~ •... p~ ... .......... ................. ~ u' ^ .. ...... • . o UPliA $ ~ : :: ............. n.... ... I ..... ..... ~ '.t eK< w ~ry' t~• ...... t~ ;~ ~ FF1 ..... :. ' ~ I * • •• . ..: .: . 34°07'30" 4 4 ' < 2 1 <43 117 ° 3 T.~O" ~EE -'~q5~ ~/~ - / 16.( J~ ] <46 35~ D~ Mapped, edited, and pubhst / N ~~ 1 \ ~y~+ Revised In cooperation with , ~~ry~~ CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF W R u9 ater \O esources IN N N ry T NE /40NTARI015 OUADRANCLE G I Control by USGS and NOS/NOAA 34117-B5-TF-024 I Topography by photogrammetrla~ 13K° taken 1952 and planetable sun 1966 0.19 6 MILS 2a0MILs PHOTOREVISED 1988 Revised from aerial photograph DMA 2452 II NE-SERIES V895 Polyconic prolectmn 1927 Nortn American uatum 10,000 foot grid based on Callforn la coordinate system, zone 5 1000 meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid licks uTM cRlo nNO 7988 MAGNETIC NORTH ZOOe 11, shown 10 blue DECLINATION AT CENTER Or SNEEi To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 I move the protection Imes 2 meters north and ~~~111 83 meters east as shown by dashed corner ticks O\• ~- There may be private Inholdmgs within the boundaries of .~., ni' __,I . c ............... ...~.. ~~ .4,. ,...., .L,....... Beryl Parcel Map CITY OF RANCHO C~ u ~ f ~ 1 2003 RECEIVED - PLANNIN( '" 1. View from SEC of project site of home on southern most parcel. Palm trees to be relocated from this area to along frontage Beryl. 2. View from NWC of southernmost parcel facing north through center parcel along Beryl. Shows improved storm drain and widened street. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parcel Map Charlestoseph Associates JJ wat,ciamvaE gaoa MHNnGE~nEM SERJiCES Pagel Bery/ Parcel Map 3. View from SEC of project site toward west portion of property. 4. View from SWC of project site west toward Beryl Avenue. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Bery/ Parce/ Map O~ Charles ioseph Associates J weucranvaESEC,oa MMIAGEMEM ffRJICFS Paget Beryl Parcel Map 5. View from SWC facing north. 6. View from SWC of project site facing south toward neighboring property. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parce/ Map ^~ Charlesioseph Associates ~,~ J weucivmvnrE sECioa MANAGEMEM fffMCES Page3 Beryl Parcel Map 7. View from NEC of southern most parcel of SWC project site to- ward Beryl. View includes active chicken coup, weeds growing through gravel with dying on site trees. In the distance windrow Eucalyptus trees that must be removed to widen street. 8. View of citrus trees within center parcel from Beryl toward west side of residential with adjacent existing barn and random boat and automobile materials. Site Photooraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Bery/ Parcel Map oa\ Charles ioseph Associates J %RIIC/Ni1VAlE SEC10R MANAGEMEM SERVICES Page4 Beryl Parcel Map 9. View of NWC of center parcel looking south behind barn of fruit trees and random material. 30. View from SWC of Northern most parcel facing toward Beryl of abandoned material and overgrown bushes and fruit trees. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parce/ Map ~~ Charles1oseph Associates J RI&ICIPRIVAlE 5EC1OR MANAGEMEM SERVICEE Pages Bery/ Parcel Map 11. View from NWC of northern most property toward Beryl with overgrown bushes growing onto abandon garage structure and ran- dom fruit trees in site. Automobile trailer, firewood, and random materials scattered throughout site. ,~-„_, 12. Close up of above mentioned structure. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parce/ Map ~a3 Charles ioseph Associates .1 PU&K/PtnvA1E SECTOR MnrvnGEMEM SEfMCES Page6 Beryl Parcel Map 13. View from structure in picture 12 looking toward NWC of pro- ject site. Includes some of the fallen trees partially on neighbors property and various wood, weeds and citrus material in front of truck, boat, camper, camper shell and trailer. 14. View of west side of house next to abandoned garage structure of Northern most parcel. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Bery/ Parce/ Map Charlesioseph Associates JJ waz,c~aavaE sECrGa MArvnGEMEM ¢RJICES Pagel Beryl Parcel Map 15. View from abandon structure toward from structure in picture 12 looking toward NEC of project site toward Beryl. 16. View from NEC of project site along Northern parcel of house and random plant material and trees. Site Photoorauhs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parcel Map ~` Charles~oseph Associates 7 PIRIICNItIVAIE SEC10R MIINAGEMENI ffRJICES PageB Beryl Parcel Map 17. View from above NEC of project site adjacent to new develop- ment along Beryl facing south toward trees to be removed for street widening. 18. View from SEC of Northern Parcel along Beryi of overgrown bushes, cacti, and street poles area that will be part of street widening. Site Photographs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parcel Map Charlesioseph Associates oar ~.,~,.M~hr_=~,~R A.Fti~C U3Ji $ER.~,'e5 • Paee9 Beryl Parcel Map 19. View from NEC of center parcel along Beryl facing south toward Eucalyptus and ]unipers to be removed for street widening. In the distance palm trees that will be relocated with large bush tree bor- Bering theright side of photo. aabove NEC of project site adjacent to new development along Beryl 'racing south toward trees to be re- moved for street widening. 2Q. View from driveway of southern most parcel north along Beryl toward junipers and various shrubs. • Site Photographs Exhibit Provided bv: Bery! Parcel Map ~~ Charles ioseph Associates MAM.~'eMEq•, IIRdCE~ PaRe10 Beryl Parce/ Map 21. View from driveway of Center parcel north of livestock structure facing north along Beryl toward Northern most parcel boundary de- picting overgrown plant and shrub material. 22. View of NEC of center parcel toward barn structure from Beryl on north side of home. Site Photoorauhs Exhibit Provided bv: Beryl Parcel Map pa$ CharlesJoseph Associates nnux~arvAr sECroa tdANAGF V cN. RFYICES u PebE'I Beryl Parcel Map V 23. View of home on center parcel east of barn. 24. View of livestock along Beryl of Southern most parcel adjacent to Center parcel. Site Photograahs Exhibit Provided bv: Bery! Parce( Map Dan Charles~oseph Associates NM1114GfMEN1 SEINCF_ Paee L City of Rancho Cucamonga i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 2. Related Fdes: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide a 3 33 acre property into 16 single-family lots m the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN 0202-751-36 and 37, and 0202-741-64 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low-Medwm Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting• North Single-Family Residential South Single-Family Residential East Single-Family Residential West Single-Family Residential 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number: Lisa Kuschel, Contract Planner (909) 477.2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: ElR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model C ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 City of Rancho Cucamonga Charles Joseph Associates Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportationlfraffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a stgnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions m the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ( ), I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Sigmficant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation mea~s[ures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared by - v Date ' -~~~ Reviewed by ~ ®/~ ~ _//SzY~~~ Date ~~ 7^Q¢ ~~ ~~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Assoaates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ O U O (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views m the area Comments: a) There are no sigrnficant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Ciel~to Street, and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is regwred prior to approval City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and g~are, however, lighting will be that typical of single-family residential neighborhoods The design and placement of light fixtures will'be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered signrficant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland O U (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result m conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The prolect site is not within Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, i pia Irntial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 to 30 acres, and then economic wability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a s~gmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is not farmland and is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west The nearest agricultural use ~s more than one mile to the north from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated L_ J 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict wdh or obstruct implementation of the applicable O O O (/) av quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violahon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtect~onable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and egwpment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate JJ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 an av quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equpment emissions are regwred to be assessed by the South Coast Au Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Praor to the Issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the fallowing provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCADMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain mactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. V ./ \ Irntial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equtpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates rn Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. L J 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than- significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 2 O J~ Initial Study for SUBTTi 6644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or U O O (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through dvect removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established natroe resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () (/) () ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with single-family residences uses The site has been previously disrupted dunng construction of the existing on-site structures According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not withrn an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are heritage trees on the prolect site A tree survey prepared by David Evans and Associates on December 8, 2004, revealed a total of 18 trees satisfy at least one criteria of the City's criteria for heritage trees Of these 18 trees, 12 trees are in poor health/form and recommended to be removed, 4 are in good health/form and recommended to be relocated, and 2 are in very good health/form and recommended to be protected if possible The remaining trees on-site are fruit or WaInuUPecan trees which are not considered heritage D~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 trees and are proposed to be removed The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1. The tour Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused within the protect landscaping. 2. The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in place, if possible, by using curb adtacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wall around tree drip line. If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not posslble, the trees shall be removed and replaced. 3. The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans wail occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Duectly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feacure~ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or total point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines ~3~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 9 • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- mfluence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of existing on-site bwldings No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would fhe project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquetaction~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table 16-1-8 () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to I~fe or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibd V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Pian FEIR The Red Hdl Fault, passes within 1 mde south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles to the north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 8 4 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 10 9 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windbloe~m sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Ramona Sandy Loam RmD Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated D~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Ramona Sandy Loam RmD Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 13 These soils are typically well drained, gently sloping alluvial fan deposits No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project wtll connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the envuonment~ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected ~~ D~,o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 12 b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City partiapates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the prolect site The protect site is located within approximately 1/4 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Alta Loma High School Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private avstnp, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated . g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the prolect is regwred to comply with ail applicable City codes, rncluding local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire m the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or mtertere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site ~~ Intttal Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Assoaates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a sigmficant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudilow~ () () () (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect wdl not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, drvers~ons, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant ~~ d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff once the site is developed, however, the protect will not alter . the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits nya L J Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Assoaates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff once the site is developed, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated Grading actnrities assoaated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is more than one acre, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared by Robert R Otte, Civil Engineer The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudilow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debrs dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City \_J U~ J Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Assoaates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established community O O U (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west This prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east, and west The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is Low-Medium Residential The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (`~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact D`~`~ i Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 11. NOISE. Would the prolect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent mcrease m ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic mcrease m ambient O (/) O ( ) noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use avport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the prolect expose people residing or working m the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The prolect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out The prolect site is subject to 210 Freeway traffic noise levels greater than the City's standard for residential of 60dBA according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 The Prel~mmary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group on October 9, 2004, determined that acceptable noise levels for residential outdoor noise (60 dBA CNEL) and indoor noise (45 dBA CNEL) will be met under the City's General Plan standards Mitigation for outdoor noise will be reduced to a level of less-than-significance using 6-foot high noise barriers along'Beryl Avenue and "windows closed" mitigation for interior noise wdl be reduced for select lots The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Exterior Noise - A noise barrier of 6.0 feet m height shall be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the northwest and southeast corners of the tract per Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. 2) Interior Noise -Mechanical ventdatfon (i.e., air conditioning) and upgraded windows shall be included on some locations in home construction per PrelrminaryAcoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. i The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied m Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime. The Dy5 Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other trines may be requved by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, tf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The block wall proposed on the south property Ime shall be constructed as early as possible. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction egwpment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be regwred 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, i( heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the constructton site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses assoaated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed actmties will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 m0es to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth m an area, either O O U (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () (/) ( ) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () (/) ( ) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located m a predominantly developed area In the future it is likely that the three existing single-family homes will be demolished and replaced with 16 new single-family Oyu • Inltlal Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 homes However, the growth rnduang impact of these new homes is not considered significant because the surrounding area is already developed with single-family homes No impacts are anticipated b,c) The project site contains three existing single-family homes In the future it is likely that these homes will be demolished and 16 new single-family homes will be constructed on the subject property No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental faaldies, need for new or physically altered governmental faalities, the construction of which could cause sigmf~cant environmental tmpacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obfechves for any of the public services a) Fire protections U U O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facdities~ O O O (/) Comments. a) The site, located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1/2 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes wdl be placed on the project so no impacts to faro services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the project site The project will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated C e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a ~~~ Initial Study for SUBTTi 6644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14 RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational faclit~es such that substantial physical detenoration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational faclities or regwre () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facl~ties which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing new housing that may cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities However, it is anticipated that 16 new single-family homes will eventually be constructed on the proposed tract of land A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial m () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at mtersections)~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacty~ () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted polices, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design i u py~ Inltlal Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate 16 two-way peak hour vehicle trips which is less than the 250 two- way peak hour taps for the non-retail threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requving a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticpated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parkmg, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Reqwre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Reqwre or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have suffiaent water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments v~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Assoaates City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 f) Be served by a landftll with sufficient permitted capacity to ~) () ~) ~/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ~) ~) ~) (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Duality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity The protect is requred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwldmg Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the prolect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable (°Cumulatrvely considerable" means that the incremental effects of a prolect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the prolect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indvectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased nose levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels DS\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 23 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~ ~~ Date ~ ~~ Print Name and Title A% v~ ~~+(,[,V~~ lr^'~(~ir'~ osa City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Oualrty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 Public Review Period Closes: February 11, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN 0202-751-36 and 37, and 0202-741-64 Project Description: A request to subdivide a 3 33 acre property into 16single-family lots FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ® The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment ^ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the prolect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period February 11, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By DS3 RESOLUTION NO 04-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644, A SUBDIVISION OF 16SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 3 33 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN MIGNONETTE STREET AND CIELITO STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN~ 0202- 741-64, 0202-751-36 AND 37 A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph Assoaates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On February 11, 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, togetherv~nth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to 3 33 acres of vacant property located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street, and The protect consists of the subdivision of 16 single-family lots, and c The lot sizes range from 5,004 to 9,816 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,393 square feet, and d The subdivision design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible with the Low-Medium District, and e A Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-01040) has been submitted because development of the site will regwre the removal and replacement of trees on-site, and f The site will gam access from Beryl Street and include public improvements such as, but not limited to, new curb, sidewalk, and gutter, and Q5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision ~s not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative trail is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract vnll not conflict v~nth any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property vnthin the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wnrien and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect vnll have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mtigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the infomtation contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration vwth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that v~nll result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations D SS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnna Division 1) Any minor exception or vanance request for reduced setbacks associated vinth future house products shall not be granted 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site The applicanUdeveloper shall be required to remove and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Number 1 under Biological Resources listed below The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading permits 3) All penmeter walls, inGuding retaining walls, visible to the public shall be made of a decorative block matenal with decorative cap to the satisfaction of the City Planner 4) The applicant shall obtain permission from adlacent property owners pnor to any off-site grading Engineenng Division ~ 1) Install pnvate landscaping and imgation systems in the parkways of comer Lots 1 and 16 along Beryl Street pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City (side-on to Artenal streets, where rear-on would be LMD) 2) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except for the 66 kV eledncal) on the opposite side of Beryl Street shall be paid to the City pnor to final map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage 3) Transitions to existing curb and gutter (pavement) north and south of the project boundary shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 5) Landscape Maintenance Distnct plans for Lots 12-14 shall incorporate attractive, low maintenance designs, compatible with or transitioning to adlacent landscape areas, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3 1 Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the wall Slope widths should be minimized through the use of 30-inch maximum height freestanding retaining walls D~.o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0423 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 4 and up to 4 feet of retaining beneath penmeter walls Low maintenance wall treatments should be used Planting areas for shrubs should have a minimum width of 3 feet, clear of wall footings Trees vnll regwre vwder planting areas, as determined by the Gty Engineer 6) Grading information pertaining to publicly maintained areas, such as landscape easements, paseos, parks, etc , shall appear on plans approved by the City Engineer 7) Dnveways to Beryl Street shall be prohibited 8) Internal 'A' Street, provide traffic stnping and signage as regwred 9) Dedication shall be made of the following nghts-of-way on the penmeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on 'A' Street 10) Install vvithin existing nght of way a route to school public sidewalk as pedestnan access as determined by the City Engineer `.J 11) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first bwlding pertrnt application is submitted to Building and Safety Forth CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division vvithin 60 days follovng the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 12) Provide 5 feet between sidewalk and penmeter wall along Beryl Landscape Maintenance Area, top of slope benches (1 foot or 2 feet) Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low' emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction p S`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 5 measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equpment shall comply vwth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the folloHnng provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance wrath local orclinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabd~zing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~a) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible O Gf1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0423 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 6 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans inGude a statement that work crews Hell shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeroial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane ~nnndows and weather-stnpping Bio/ogrca/ Resources 1) The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused vnthin the pro/ect landscaping 2) The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in place, if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and meandenng penmeter wall around the tree dnp line If the City Engineer and City Planner deternine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees shall be removed and replaced 3) The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speGal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 7 v~nthin the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report wrath original illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrucbon field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speufic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties. Should fossils be found wdhin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately desert construction and notify the monitor of the find . . Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speGmens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdrzing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated v~nth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, Duo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 8 precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, ten'aces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wall be used on-sde to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wrath the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2000 3) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submd to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Extenor noise - A noise bamer of 6 0 feet in height shall be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the northwest and southeast comers of the tract per PnlimrnaryAcoustical Study prepared by RK Engineenng Group 2) Intenor noise -Mechanical ventilation (i e , air conditiornng) and upgraded ~nnndows shall be included on some locations in home construction per Pre%mmary Acoust~ca/ Study prepared by RK Engineenng Group 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as speafied m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times maybe regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actrvdies shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or hatred . 5) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase ^` ~Q~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-23 SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 9 6) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 datly tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~a City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect Fde No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed prolect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the prolect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the prolect The prolect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The prolect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the prolect file with the department having the original authority for processing the prolect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Page 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that requre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits ~~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16644 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Lisa Kuschel Date: January 27. 2004 .. • ... -. ' -. . ~ .. ~ . Av Ouality .;~; -,~~ ~ ~:o~a~~~~-~~:~ ,~5 St ~ s '-~k` a,r. w $.~*~~s':~ A 1, r~ w ~y , ~ A ~ ° s t~X~p ~ ~ 3 t o- ~~~~~ ~ . a- i if .. A } - L" , ~ .a°4'."'eY~`f~On . .{ ~ P . ~ p a L ib r.< two Ti' ,:: . . lAS n _a a'l~ a .:. x-.3 All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C Z4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coahngs shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray - Allasphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and waterin r~ V 1 0~ s s s . . .... .. . ... .. . -. .. Pave or apply gravel to any on•site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soli during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Rewew of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn ractices Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C by the City ii silt is carried over to adfacent public Rewew of Plans A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , CE C Review of Plans A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 re uirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Rewew of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternatroe fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high efhciency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 2of7 .. .. . -. ., . . All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C yq regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological ~ ~: .'i° !° ~, ~ t'rr~:~, ~`M 's ,hcj ra ~ Se ~<'~t °~a',: ,~- -,`i~Pt`~~,. v ~ ^E'. `8 ' 5 F'~ ~,,y~. ~ 'i 33A ~~,• ~~?;,~' ~ ' ,~ ~.~;~ '~€~~~`,ara~*§-''.5-: ` .. ~'~'.~,++r ts, ~ The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting CP r . , D k a. .M ~ , . kac ,a ih&!„~o~''~+ ,tit°' ~ „ 4 ~„ , 9Vd , .v and reused within the project landscaping During A 3/4 Construction The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California CP D During A Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in 3/4 place, if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and Construction meandering perimeter wall around tree drip line If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees shall be removed and replaced The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced CP D Duri ng A 3/4 Construction Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wail • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report ~ 3oi s .. • - • . .. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA wdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Rewew of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Rewew of A/D 4 field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP 8 Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notii the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a Report copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 4 of 7 .. . - .. .. ~ • . .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C Durng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quahry ' Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE 8/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identity the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Q 5 0~ ~ ~ s . -. .: Prwr to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C Z4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise ~~.~~, - ~,~. »~x Exterior Noise - A noise barrier of 6 0 feet in height shall BO C During Plan A/C 4 be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the Check and northwest and southeast corners of the tract per Construction Preliminary Acoushcal Study prepared by RK Engineering Group Interior Noise - Mechanical ventilation (i e , air BO C During Plan A/C 4 conditioning) and upgraded windows shall be included Check and on some locations in home construction per Preliminary Construction Acoushcal Study prepared by RK Engineering Group Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a nahonalhohday 6of7 ~ • - • . .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, ii noise levels exceed the above - standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Planning Division Ii noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced In intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The block wall on the south property line shall be CP C During q A constructed as early as possible in the first phase Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and f rom the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency s _ Method of,Verificatlori ~' ~;~~~yy ~~~a}ti ~ Sa~ctloris ~1~~ rva , CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B • Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 7 O~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 SUBJECT: 16 LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF BERYL, BETWEEN MIGNONETTE AND CIELITO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its awn expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the city Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Comoletion Date -~-~- _/-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 1 ~~ Protect No SUBTT16644 Comoleaon Date 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for Cary Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of any Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the Cary Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a Itst of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street E. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks to excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division F. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any houses The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report -~-~- -/~- ~-~- ~~_ ~~ ~~- ~-~~ ~-~_ -/-/ -~~. _/_/~ SC-10-03 2 D~~ Prgect No SU8TT76644 Completion Date 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bulding & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Cary staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit G. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Dmsion Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements SC-10-03 3 ~~ -/-/- -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- -/-/- _/~_ -/_/. -/-/- Protect No SUBTT16644 Completion Date I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submttted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/ marked with the prolect file number (t e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Dtwsion for availabildyof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map ~_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/ K. Grading ~ 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requved for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer SC-10-03 4 ~~ Protect No SUBTT16644 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Clty for all interior public streets, community trans, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-oi-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on 'A' Street 3 Corner property Itne cutoffs shall be dedicated per Ctty Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City M. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Stde- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Beryl Street X X X X X 'A' Street X X X X X X Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Handloapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~-~_ -~-~- ~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~-/. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 5 D~Q Protect No SU8TT16644 Completion Dale e Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer f Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots g Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Sheet Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size• Oty- Beryl Street P A 5' or greater Genera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o c 15 gal FIII in P A less than 5' Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3' 25' o c 15 gal FIII in 'A' Street Select appropriate tree trom approved street tree list for Rancho Cucamonga Llst each street as a separate line Item within this legend STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE TO APPEAR ON LMD PLANS, LISTED FOR REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS At rear yard lots Beryl Street P A 5' or greater Geltera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o c 15 gal P A less than 5' Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3' 25' o c 15 gal 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxiclties or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the Clry Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only N. Public Maintenance Areas 2 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Clty Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District The three rear yard lots on Beryl Street (Lots 12-14) Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-Irrigated surtaces / /_ -- -~-~- -/-(- / / -/~_ -~-/. -~-~- SC-10-03 8 ~ 1 l Protect No SUBTT16644 Completion Date 3 A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City O. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Cary Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the Cary Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the Courry of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requrements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ciry, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~_J -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- -/~- -/-/- _/-/. _1_/. ~-/- SC-10-03 7 ~' T p RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT/FILE #: Subtti 6644 APPLICANT NAME: Charles Joseph & Assoc PROJECT NAME: _Beryl Subdrvlswn OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 LOCATION: 6896 Beryl FLOOR AREA (S): Subdivision only DATE: 10-21-2003 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Type V-N PLAN TYPE: SFR tract 16-lot subdiv FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi PLANNER: Rick Fischer ANNEXATION N/R Fire: Non-High Hazard Building permits will not be issued without approved water plans from CCWD and FCS. Afire flow letter will be required upon plan check submittal for the home construction. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Pnvate Water Supply. Water (fire) plans must be approved by RCFPD and CCWD prior to permit issuance 1 General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m multifamily residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft c For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft d Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire D~ r i 2 The regwred fire flow for this prolect will be determined when the square footage of the homes are determined This Fire flow regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow sublect to Fue District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adlacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fve hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Number of Fire Hydrants Prowde one fue hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, sublect to standard spacing and distribution requirements FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Restncted Residential Access Mitigation: The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies to protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or conditions delaying response exists Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 3 Restncted Residential Access: Gated or access for all residential development shall comply with the following a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device Approved devices are available from Opticom (3M) and Tomar Electronics Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specrfications b A Knox Rapid Entry System Key Box is regwred to be installed adlacent to each gate in a Fire Distnct approved location The box shall be mounted where it is clearly visible and access is unobstructed c Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch d The key switch shall be located immediately adlacent to the Knox Box for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset Contact Bwldin and Safet /Fire Construction Services 909 477-2713 for ins ection FSC-5 Plan Submittal Regwred Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Building permits will not be issued until the water (fire) plans are submitted and approved by CCWD and Fire Construction Services Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards D~0 2. Private Fve Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, an operable prior to delivering any combustible budding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ) representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect 4 Public Installation: All requved public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwldmg materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on- sitefire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead- end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards J "\ Jason Hoover 6905 Beryl Street Alta Loma, CA 91701 January 30, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DNISION P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern. ~ 'b~~R11~]CFfD CUCAfNONGA FEB 0 5 2004 There aze three issues that require attention regazding my current residence at 6905 Beryl Street (APN-202-041-14) The Fast concern is that the proposed development has only one street. If for every household there aze three cars dnving in and out of the area each day then on average the number of cazs using that street each week will be 336 or 17,472 cars per year. All of the headlights from these vehicles, whether they aze traveling North or South, will be duectly aimed into my living room, kitchen, and bedrooms. Not only do I feel lilce tlis will infringe on my privacy and comfort but that rt wdl also lead to the devaluation of my property. I am asking the Planning Division to please review this issue To avoid this nuisance the in-let/out-let could be moved 107 feet to the north The second issue is that all proposed street unprovements are not con•ect at APN-202- 041-14. There ~s a 7 foot Jogged that ~s in a western duecrion of Beryl Street wlich does not meet the 66 foot mrnimum requirement. I have already discussed this violation with Lisa Kuscher and have not received a satisfactory response to this problem. The thud matter is that the added traffic already incurred from the proposed development has made rt extremely difficult to get out of my residence from 7 00 am until 10.00 am and the additional traffic from the residents of the development will only aggravate the problem I will be video taping the traffic jams. There should be a traffic sign or signal installed to help control the senous traffic condttions. I have discussed the matter with Dave Williams of Alta Loma High. I was disappointed with lvs reply of "I'm only concerned with some development rf it's across the street" I told lim that I feel rt rs a public safety issue for the children, elderly, and adults within aone-mile radtus of the school. He replied, " If I get a chance I will look in to rt". I appreciate your taking the rime to review my concerns and hope they will be resolved to the satisfaction of all those involved. Sincerely, ason Hoover ~Lrl -- --. __ ~ i I {1I ~- ' _I 'I r,_ ._ - `33' , ~.~3 • ~ x" APN 2Q2-822-01 _ ~ ~ ~i~ I .~ I' ~ . _ j I ~ ~r II ~ I 11 j I &~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ,~~~ EXIST//NC RfIA(NINC WACj. ~ 1 I I '~ 1 501 I y ii r~, ~ 1 ~ r'- '-li-,$---,/.-.-.-;~.- ry;9`i I~~~~~~ CI j ~ N R/W ,95.7- - c' ': ~; ' ~ 3~ ~ I OIN E~'%ST/NC SIDEWALK /"''~~`~ ~''~~ I ~o I III _ .A 2D2-BZ2-o4 ~ o s' i i '~~ ~ N P E _ X94-9 ~. ~./ ~ ~4~P3e -'--' 1°~ - r --- la NI I I _~ ~ ~ ~9;;'r//,~7'-~~l / //~~ I I II~ '-~- --- Ices ,, r-- I Zi ;\! ,~I PE.-- 94.s i i ^. jT i II i I L~RNVE ~ ~ I - ~ - r~ u' ~. ._' _'i ~l C lgy~O I I I , y___ a_,1 0ti~~ ~ C N85'13;48~E 102 2' + .3 I " N ( j ~ :.tY'.=;~= S= ,,~ _ B ice- ~ Il~yi, I ~° `~ M, ~ z ~~~ ~~ APN 202-7 1- 4 _ ~~~ ml I ~ i ~ y APN 20~-78f'= of ~ III ' ~ _ rn ~ ; O~ \ •°'! -/ QP~ ~ ~ ~ 1; ~>~ i i --'" IrNI i i ;~/}2; ?2-03 ~ q ~ ~{ ~ / l-I~1~/~rN85 3' k 4 1 ~ I ~I I I I( /j ~- I- ~ tg~~~~ / ~r 4P` ti '~ m I ~ Ili ` ~ \ ~---I---- o' }S 04' "-- ~ ~ I I 6n~Nl - l ~ Imo:o"~ ~ - j ~ ~ _ '16 I I I I i-I ;, - -- _ ---- ------ ----- ---- L=-28 2' _ 1-" I - ') I ~ !L , 6MH ~ f~ ' ' \ P E 88 7 " I _M --" ' ` "' . M x- _ --St's ~ ~- i .. ~ - - z ° --- - ~ -I=- , --~ ~-i; -~ c Ns TCN BAS/N _ r '" ~ -F `^ ~- I ~ ~- ~2"G/1 ~• EWi j STORM DRAIN SI,' ~ /~~~ G", ~ 277 BS L. ~j W i /~ ~ ' 6~ '~ 52 6' 96 4 3' ds U ~ `L1,• ~ °• "1 I 702- j-14 •„~ _ - _ _ I ,,-~~ ,/MOD/FYI EX SD BOX FOR NEW 36' RCP /NLET FROM NORTH tit `~ ~ - -~ -Y -~- t _ SMN 4 1 __ ~1~= OP OF_ EX BOX TO MATCH FS T -_ -__ - r +--- - ~ - - - - .WATER 46'09 E- - -19U0' - 1.00 °~~- ~ ~ ; r ~ r / JG SEWER B~ -- -- --- - I I ~ ,,- , O~ i , + SMH ' FL r ~ ~-^ j,'l~"` _ -- f~A > > -- - /, '' Ln ' ~ ~ ~~ /% ' ~.-86 A ,1 42.6 ti ~~ ~ ' i - - -I j~.'r ~ ' / // / /~ i 1 % j / i , , b l ~ ~, I I ~ II I ~ , ~ PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ~ TOP WALL 8° ABOVE P E 'w m ~ PE. I &8/1=,___. ~ti'~ = 8@.,1~ •~I I ( "~ m '~ PJ EXISTING ~ ~, _ - {- ~ ~ ~i r APN 202-041-24 ~ AC DRIVEWAY ~ ~ ti ~ _~ -' _ ~ ~ h ' ----- - -~' I I I ~ '^ 3 %'~l_ ~ m ~ I l= --- -__---ter - ~ ~ 16' B.S.L.'i~ I V I ~ I'F~yl I I ~. REM f~TING 12" SOUARE ti Z ' rya - - - ~ - - - 1 Y i l ~ 1£ INLET & PLUG 12" R.C P _ ~ ~_-_ _=i~----~- _ C - - -- -J'S 0' ' ~~~_ ._ ~. ' ~ - JOIN NC SIDEWALK -"-295.8 '---~y ~- ~\\ I -Ifi- i f ,,~E-~,AY t -y~~ I I I SECTIC - - - - ->~- -~ f-~r~ -~~s ~ I I I ,I ~ _~_____-= NOT r ~ i % ~- i J-'-{ i /~ ~ ~~~ I J' I ; t ~ ~/~ ~n~ -_, r ~jr // 11' Im i Q I I If 1 -----~ _ __; O ~O ~~ / ~ ~ / i / i I '~ I - ~ APN ?0?-OSi-2J t~ Ff ~i :' ~- , '~ ~ I Ln i2 ~ 8815 ~ ; ~;~'~ ~-~1 I ~ ~; .I'. EXIS1lNG SIDEWALK ~~ d ~~~ ~ ' I,,,I I I III I I r • S f ~ ¢f ~~ EX RETAINING WALL ~~ ~_ ; ~ , i ~- ~ +,. ~ f ,~ Z *~} ( - EXISTING PAD b ----__~ _ _, `- "'.. ELEV VARIES °j 0 w ~ ~i 0 ~~ 00 m a" 0 u, o ~g a~ ~o ~; ~~~ ~~° 0 ~° ~(qUt 8Y ~u0 i~w $a '~o uu ~~S :a s "p 9 j U £ g W ]~ob.~87 3~8~$a3C~ C =S~°E~ ~3~$e~SCk :o- aFy~='ga~~ s°,P~°~ o°Yo=~~~§~S~ :t7~an -< g°7~ ~~ :63kem ~Ypp~s'~`g~b Zg~~ ~ ~°4~..i~~~3$ lOl-OOl/SlZ 8 W Z49f1 ON 1Otl211 0 i w a S ' E ~ ~I~ ~ i ~ ; ~'~ ;_ ' _--_-_~_ ~rus r I I P c ~ ~ @ r m ~I S y ~ a o ~ of ` ~ = i ~ ~ U m T Q ~ ~ ~ LL~ ~I I ~ ~- 9 ~ 2 ~ ~ ,_ ~ B$-LS/9ll B W E£Sf ON 1Otl 81 ~ R @ B ~ ; ~ S _ _ _ i4 by O a a y ze iil $R = Y 1 ' L 4 ap 4 c R `~ ; _ p n era I - ~5 { ~ h + ^z gh 8 ~ ~ R sc jl_ `°u`a.° ~ 1332llS .tl. y . 9C! ~- tui _ gg anY+~ - 1 <~n H~ - iur3e - ;~ ~ r a rr ' ~.~. n., p ''~ ~ ~ J..2YO A { a °j 3' p5 a pal o ~ a 4 ekYe ~f~j p ~ m4 : ^~ P 0~ i~~8~ HY ~; ~' ~€j ~ r 46884; _ & ~ ' 4 0~ l s f ~ s € - _ ~" - - - - ~"~ - 'ova3wa`n- - ~ L6-66/lL~ 9W ~ 4t4Zt ON lOtltl1 \\ a m o~ d ° q ~ ~ E~ Q~ d~ 3 ~O ~m z ~ ~a u a s R { s `~a S 2 a S a a i C T H E C I T Y O F SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivision for condominium purposes on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel -APN 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 92 condominiums consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area wlthln Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN. 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A request to increase the maximum building height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area, for a proposed 92 condominium development on 6 90 acres of land In the Foothill Boulevard- Cucamonga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 0207-101-32, 33, and 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 BACKGROUND On March 19, 2003, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2002-00001, Development District Amendment DRC2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00001, to change the land use and zoning of the site from Office to Mixed-Use to allow for Office and/or Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Under the Medium Residential component (100 percent of the site), up to 96 units may be permitted The applicant is proposing 92 attached condominiums on the site ITEMS "E,F,G" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 13 3 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail/Existing abandoned railroad corridor, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Homes/Trader Park, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vineyard Town Center, Commurnty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard District) West - Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site- Mixed-Use North - Open Space South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - General Commercial West - Open Space D Site Characteristics This unusual 6 90 acre site is severely constrained by its triangular shape The site is vacant and slopes southerly at an average of approximately 4 to 5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of the site where the slopes exceed 25 percent The site includes several scattered mature trees and a remnant Eucalyptus windrow that exists near the southwest corner of the property The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard The structures had been deemed non-historic The site is bordered on the west and north by the slope embankment of the abandoned railroad that is planned for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trad, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land, followed by single-family development and a trailer park to the south, and the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Center to the east Access into the site is from Foothill Boulevard E Parking Calculations Number of Square Parking Spaces Type of Use Foota a Ratio Reguued Condominiums N/A 2 garage or carport 184 spaces spaces per unit Guest Parking N/A 1 space for each 4 units 23 spaces Total 207 The protect exceeds the guest-parking regwrement by 9 spaces ANALYSIS Number of Spaces Provided 184 garaged spaces 32 uncovered spaces 216 A General The applicant is proposing to develop 92 attached condominium units The protect will include two 4-plex units, 14 6-plex units, and a recreation center with a pool and spa for use by residents of the proposed private community The condominiums will ~, F~ G a u PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 3 be comprised of an "uphill" and "flat" bulding product, each with two separate floor plans The "uphill" product will include 1,650 and 1,923 square foot units with 228 and 349 square foot courtyards, respectively The "flat" bulding product will include 1,406 and 1,857 square foot units with 244 and 225, or 295 square foot courtyards, respectively The larger units are located at the ends of each building product The 6-plex "flat" product is proposed with a 442 square foot third story loft option The condomirnums and recreation center buildings are designed with stucco and stone veneer exteriors The stone veneer is incorporated as a wainscot treatment on parts of the buldings and around the building entries and tower elements Other elements on the buildings include stucco trim, shutters, corbels, iron accent treatments, and wrought iron railings B Variance DRC2003-00848 The design of the buildings exceed the 30-foot maximum building height allowed in the hillside district. As proposed, the "uphill" product will exceed the height by approximately 18 inches on a small portion of the roofline on the downhill (garage) side of the buildings, and the "flat" product will exceed the height by approximately 18 inches on a small section along the ridgeline for those bindings that include a loft option Because of the location and limited amount of area of the bindings that exceed the height, staff does not feel the binding designs would create a negative visual impact The site is nestled up against a steep slope embankment of the former Pacific Electric Railway, that measures approximately 15 to 20 feet in height, hence, the 18-inch increase in binding height will be greatly dimirnshed by the slope and related landscaping Included in the variance request is a request to extend the maximum retaining wall height allowed in the hillside district from 4 feet to approximately 12 feet along the north protect boundary, and 6 feet, 8 inches along the east boundary Each wall will include a 6-foot open wrought iron fence on top, for a total combination wall height of 12 feet, 8 inches for the east wall, and 18 feet for the north wall For calculating total combination wall heights in the City, the wall is measured up from the mid-point of the retaining wall, giving the wall along the east boundary a measured height of 9 feet, 4 inches and the wall along the north boundary a height of 12 feet The retaining walls proposed by the grading design are necessary to create a buidable area within the confines of this very narrow triangular parcel Given that the expansion in wall heights are not expected to be visible from Foothill Boulevard, and that the top 6 feet of the walls are an open wrought iron fenang material, the walls on the site are also not expected to have a negative casual impact to the surrounding area In conclusion, the unique triangular shape of the property presents a severe constraint for the physical site planning of the protect that warrants flexibility from the strict interpretation and application of the City's development standards for the Medium Residential District C Design Review Committee On January 6, 2004, the Design Review (Stewart, McPhail, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended it return to the next meeting with revisions The Committee stressed to the applicant that special design sensitivity and quality is important because the location of the site fronts on to, and is elevated above, the City's most important east-west arterial street The Committee believed that the proposed binding design should be revised to represent a true "Tuscany" architectural style in addition, the Committee agreed with staff that there was an insufficient amount of visitor parking on the site The Committee explained, that although the protect meets the minimum amount of visitor parking requred, the location of the protect does not allow for any off-site parking overflow because it is isolated and adtacent to Foothill Boulevard The Committee further explained that they wanted to make sure there would be no parking E,F,c3,3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 4 issues for the protect in the future (Exhibit "J") The developer agreed to come back to the next meeting with the requested revisions On January 20, 2004, the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Fletcher, Fong) reviewed the rewsed protect The applicant redesigned the protect to incorporate a more authentic "Tuscany" architectural style by adding additional stone treatment, shutters, window trim, iron elements, a softer color palette, and landscaping around the buldings In addition, the pool house was redesigned to include an enhanced entry, additional stone, shutters, and iron elements The parking issue was addressed by adding an additional 7 guest parking spaces to the site Two of the spaces were added near the pool house in a parallel parking design A staircase was also added between Buildings 15 and 16 to allow better pedestrian access to the pool area The applicant agreed to continue to work with the adtacent property owner to incorporate the vacant property in front of the site into the protect design. The Committee recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval with no additional comments or corrections (Exhibit "K") D Technical and Grading Review Committees The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval E Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit for removal of trees on-site An arboncultural report was performed by California Arbor Care on September 23, 2003 The report stated that trees growing on-site have been there for 40 years or more, and have lacked sufficient care and irrigation The 25 trees on-site are structurally poor, contain dead wood, and have signs of disease associated with the Eucalyptus Borer and Bark Beetle The report suggested that the trees be removed and replaced because of the increased value of new, properly cared for plantings To meet replacement regwrements, environmental mitigation and conditions of approval, all Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance F Neighborhood Meeting On January 8, 2004, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the protect Seven people attended the meeting The residents were primarily interested in the protect design, which included the protect density, layout, architecture, unit size and cost, as well as the proposed landscaping design and fate of the existing mature trees on- site The developer showed the residents the layout of the site and explained that the protect consists of 92 attached condominium units on 6 90 acres of land, with a density of lust over 13 units per acre In addition, the developer explained that the protect is designed with a "Tuscany" architectural theme, which includes units that range approximately 1,400 to 1,900 square feet in size The final design of the buildings is still being worked out with the City The developer also indicated that the cost of the units would probably start in the mid $200,000's, and that all of the trees on the site would have to be removed as part of the development The residents were generally in favor of the overall protect design, type, and location G Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II It was determined the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on the following 1 Short-term air quality during site grading ~t r~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 5 Biological Resources in terms of tree removal Cultural Resources, if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or durng gradmg 4 Geology and Sods for storm water pollution prevention 5. Hydrology and Water Quality for water quality 6 Noise for during construction and protect sound attenuation The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval wdl reduce the short-term impacts to less than significant CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to ali property owners within a 500-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651, Development Review DRC2003-00847, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respecttu submitte Br Buller City Planner BB WM/tm Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Site Pian Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651 Exhibit "E" - Budding Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Phasing Ptan Exhibit "H" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "I" - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated January 6, 2004 Exhibit "J" - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated January 20, 2004 Exhibit "K" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00847 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2003-00848 E,F, G S f ".~- EYSfHO LOW R4EMNL ~~ ,~~ ,I~ I ' /" i I i i e -~~ i ." 9 I I \ ~ ~~ E>~ /~ I I I _ ~ ~ ~ / ~ 'Fl-@-A ~ E164Rq /~ / M138R8OtB 9KRRA'1 CEWIEp I~ / / A]-pF~t I ~~ N.®114 I~ / II I ' 1 L E}8fW / LO'M IE3CMVL F. Qi1Wp LON IE3ENIUL <' P ~ ~ / / 3 \ / M-pF31 w~u u4 ~ W~ ~ P P ' \ MI-11F'A / ~\ I ~ ~~ ~I S /' i i 1j ~ i I 'M-31Fp ~ ~ Ill ^ I ~ // ` I / ~ xo1-v I I I IEiMW 49[fNfI4L I ~ ~ I 1' N SCALE (-100 SITE UTILIZATION MAP TUSCANY VILLAS LEGEND .ac< .re sen++ ~~ ~ mnc..~.. p<»-m. ~rm.avn~ap.a .~..,_. ~~~~T r ~ ~~ i 1 i TiCffi,TTw~ •h ~ ' ~i ..w..e .~ „ ° i r~~~ F[T ~r ,uruT u LEGEND mLOi c xunxrn ~~ F~FUT /-U ~ UPHILL RECREATION ARFA ~ ° POOL ° CABANA ~ MAIN PRO.IECi F.NTRY ° GAZE ° LANDSCAPE MONUMENTATION ~ MIMBEROF UNITS I~ J i~ ` '1/ / J a .~ 11 /1 6PLEX UPHILL ° ]TOTAL BUILDDJGS • a2 rorv, uNlrs d-PLE%UPHH.L - ° 1 TOTAL BUB.DDJG ° 0 TOTAL UNITS "Y Zn,~C~ .e -VJ Sl 1 " ~° w° ~.E ~'„ _ ,=x u ,fix ~.~ 6 ~ 1 _ __ - g L tmow AREA a es nG t _ _ __ _ ~ ( ' l l 6F _ p I _...~ s : ~ L(~L-t1t'r 1 VIII-IiAS°~':=rt. _ - ~ - _ ' ~ 9T' - _-_ __- ______ ____. ._ _ - onc.~cuavaPNu -' ~ CLIENT K&SPROPERTY LLC - - _ coNTACr MP K.Frol.o~m... ~ PTUAL SITE P 369M Nigewuoa ctrde - - „_ ~D,-0„ Wguo. 111 CA 9265] , CASE q SU~TT16651, DRC3001-0OBtl, DRC3001-00808 - _ sM p~ ~ - . ~i I ~ "6 ~ ,~ - ~~ L I N ' r II/ ll x ~ I~ f _~ , / f 9 ,, ~' Jr `~~l ' ~\ - - 6-PLE%PLAT ° ]TOTAL BUILDINGS ° 42 TOTAL UNITS -- - d-PLEX FLAT ° I TOTAL BUILDMG ° 4TOTAL UNITS MAIL KIOSK DECELLERATION LANE ~EMERCENCV ACCESS SCE EASEMENT f ~_ P-1 ~ ' ~ ~\ E \ \ \ [ i Ij ~ ~ s ' ~ n~~ b ~ -`' ~ ,~ ! t ~ A~ ,, r, S a~a~~ ~~ [4 t 1~ 'i~ ~ ! ; s .Is} 3 I. ~ ~ 19i != •il •.'1 t. ~. !,'t~... ~~:ii.E}l e[~~I l.~ ~ ' a '~~'~~~g~ ~' v ~ ~~~,~ ~ ttr a~a tyit4Ny~f~l~~lll:e~lltiSiitfi~i~~i ~!(IL~P~fff ~bf~i1 ~~~~1 ~F~~11 ~_~f~ & O ~ ~~ ~~~'~.1 ~1 ~ `. ~ >~ ~~ ~ ^~+b I .._.. ..ai..il. .k...,. u~i~y~iiati• ~~ ~ I 1 dl I ®m ~~ ~ 6 { ~1o,•'E~• ,q, ~ al;~ 6 s~~,~~, ~~ •~ ~I~ o- ~ ~ ~ ~ o ^~ ` \ \ ~' ~~I q b ~ \ , b ha \ ~ q ~ ~~~ qq ~ ~~~ \ ~ \ \ 3 ~ / ~ ~ /\ ' \ e a ~ / 1 ~ •\ 6 • \` \~ Y q b` 4p ~ S \ ff ~Id \ F ~ \ q R ~,y 4 ~ ~ ~ qq ~ ~ ~ \ 4 i ~ ~~~ ~` a / s `` ~ J ~ r , Z ~ \ ~ ~ ~ e ` •'a ~ a ~ ~ . ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ a , a J t a.X . q ~° f~i y ~ ~ Z Z Q ~ O ~` ~ __ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~ ~ ~ t < ~. '"~ dM1 ~' ~~ ~, ~ d ll(y~ b ~ 4 b' T ~ ~ ~ ~ ( 8 ~ a9 \ ~ . • p ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z 1 ~{.} L . ~ q III ~ g t ~ \ ~~'~ 4 C b t ~ ~ ' ' J --JJ Q i 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ i x A ~ "r~ B~ ~ N ~ W U ~ - ~ -- \ °t e~\.~\ c i ~ e ~ _ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ W , ~ U 0 ~ pp F; ,~ e ~ ~ b ~ ~~~ ~ y ~°' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ e ~ ~ ` 1~'i-- 3 \ \ t tQ 4 ~ ~ 1 i AI_ !' ~ \ ~ a. ~ c s.b ~. - +-a_p _~1j ~ '~ i__- { t ~ ~ n Y r f ~ \ ~ ~ og ~ r ~ " °~ \\ \ b1 ~\ I ~ 1 ~ ~ \ ~ . / 1 t~ y~\ `~ / :l Y ~ b ~' \ b ~ Y. v ~'• \ ~y Z M i 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ el O ~s `-~ ~- Z U li ~= `` I W / ~ ~ F~ ~\ ~~~~~~~\~ ~ 1' ~ i ~ ~~ ~;~b; ~ C ' __..__ ..__m.~.__.._. _____ r ,w~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ?Ir ~~~~~~~ A ~~ a ~ ii ''ii ~{I e ~ ~~ ~~II 1~1 ~ \ ~ ~ s ~ J ' `~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ a s- F 4~~' {{{ 1 ,_ ~ ~ ^' ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~A \ ~ ~ ~ JI X68 { t g~ ~ ~,~\ ~ A c I ~ ~~ ~- ~.. - \~~V ~ ~_\ A ~. - e i z .-, o ~ a ~I w z /~ U1 " Oz a ~ N 0 ~ Q. z z ~ o~ Q` `o ~ ~ = ~ ~ a << ~' U Z EC '~ U (aI ~F ~ O O uF ~~ ^j q O Vl ~, L. z ~ 04 E-~ ° ~ ~F W O ~, E-e -- `~ z \ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ C 1 { ~< _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V~~~ . ~ a {~ \ ~ !' ~ \ I ~, { _ ~`' \ I t0 ~'y~ ~i~i i`~:3y~2s ale . {` a'{ t ~i;~gv.n.{ ~:{ ~ iii, ~'s'"'a= =e: \ ` I \ , ~O \ X01 ~~ 1 ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ , ~~~~' A, . ~ ~~\' o~ ~~~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ {~ .~. ~ gg ~ e ~ ~~~ g@;~~ s ~'~ S s{f?it°itil E{1{9.~Is ~ .~ , <aeisi' f~ s{{c{`.~fple ~{!{- ers - \ ` . \~ \ . .. ~ S9ye 5~ s ~, a SI l III 1~ i~.il, ~~ / 'I I 1. 6' mot'' ~y rn 0 TUSCANY VILLAS C~„ AT REDHILL 4-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT a~ncxocucnworvcA cALRORNIA SCALE JOb" ~ 1'-0" CLIENT K&SPROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Koeraw Omidvur .°,°~"r~1OA'"~'',4"`.' ~ • ""°^"' 16901 H1pphwood Cirtle ~~- -~ "`~'~""' L~euu~Hllb CA 91651 s. ,.,.~....,., Ad CASE M SU~1T166J1, ORCi00J-0080], HRC2001-00808 PLAN 1 YI,AIV 1 PLAN J FRONT ELEVATION PLAN J PLAN 1 PLAN t PLAN J REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION rn PLAN JJ LEFT ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL unrno cuc.anroxc.a, cwrolwu CLIENT K A S PROPERTY LLC CONTA ¢CT Mr Kaaraa Omidnr W~Oue~HRI CA 913653 CASE N SU~TT16651, DRC100J-008tl, DRCJ00J-0OSdB 4-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT SCALE ]l16"-1'-0" .mvm .a.nc~~~ .v.: .-~ ...,.... ~, A-5 PLAN) FRONT ELEVATION ~~ N REAR ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS /~ AT REDHILL 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/LOFT ~Ol SCALE ]/16' ~ 1'-0" P.W CNO NCAMOMG.r. C.V.IFORMA CLIENT K k S PROPERTY LLC euvuuenm ronm~° ~s CONTACT Mr Kmrow Omidvrt ° 26901 FD¢bwood Circle sw--- +~~~~~ A-IJ G • Rllb CA 92fi5J CAFEq SU~TT166J1, DRC200J-0OBC], DRC3003-00808 ~ s ~ PLAN 3 PLAN I PLAN 1 PLAN 1 YLArv 1 rr.wrv a PLAN J PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 rLArv 1 RIGHT ELEVATION rn S' PLAN 3 LEFT ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL CLIENT K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Korrorv OmlAVrr 36901 NI¢¢hnooA Circle U ao~HlRr CA 93657 CASE p SU131T16651, DRCt00J-00847, DRC2007-00848 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/LOFT SCALE J//6" -1'-0" wnw~mam ~:- n~~..w.n.. A-ld PLAN J rn y TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL PLAN ~ RW CNO CUCAMONCA, CALffOPMA CLIENT K & 5 PROPERTY LLC CONTALT Mr Kmrow Omidv~r 36901 Nlghwood Circle Legvvo LOh CA 9369 CASE M SU73TT16651, DRC3007-006tl, DRC300J-OOBd6 PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 REAR ELEVATION 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT ELEVATIONS OF PRODUCTS FACING FOOTHILL BLVD. SCALE 7/16" -1'-0" PLAN 1 PLAN d ~~~ri.~- -'_ yueam I I I I I ...,, PLAN) PLANT PLANT PLAN] PLANT PLAN) FRONT ELEVATION 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/LOFT LEFT ELEVATION 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/LOFT rn =n PLAn a LEFT ELEVATION 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL CLfE1VT K & 5 PROPERTY LLC CORTAC¢¢T Mr Kartow Omidvrt L ¢voeHE1~CA9 653 CASE 0 5 TTI0651, DRC200J-0Oeq, DRCI00J-0OOdO ELEVATIONS OF PRODUCTS FACING FOOTHILL BLVD. SCALE J/16"=1'-0" ~~~ v~ ..... ~.~ A-0 PLAN3 r.v. ~rw..~ ~ ~ ~ttew vT~ma LaNC<Onu PLAN I<~~ ~ PLAN 2 PLAN 2 ~ PLAN d FRONT ELEVATION 11+ _~ REAR ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS ~ AT REDHILL ry~ _ 4-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT / f C SCALE J/16"=1'-0" / IIANC11000CAMOHGACALffORNU _ - - CLIENT K & 5 PROPERTY LLC " " ° °"" CONTACT Afr Korrow Ooildvar ~'9.= ~ r ` " ` ~ ~ 26901 HI hwood Clale ~ -- ~"-= ~` "~' ""'°"`^" e4"19 Na CA 92653 Laguva CASE M 8I1~TTI6651, DRC200J-008tl, DRC200J-00848 I i PLAN d PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN d RIGHT ELEVATION m PLAN / LEFT ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL x.vax o cucunanc~, cu,vowx.~ CLIENT K @ S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT 81r Kmrvr OMdv~r 36901 FII¢hw'ood C4rle L~gvv~ Hill CA 9165] CA&EM Sl~Ti16651, ORC1001-0Ox1], DRC3003-00818 4-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT SCALE 1116"-1'-0" ~~_ eo..~mmm ~~ ~~~~~ -~~~......n~ A-i0 PLAN 1 ------- -- -- - FRONT ELEVATION rn REAR ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT SCALE J116"~1'-0" pANCNO NCAMONGA CALOORNIA CLIENT K k S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Kmrow Omidvar ~'~10.. ~"O,°~`^..'°•^"A° ~"` 36901 HlRhwood Circh ~ ~~~~ ...v.. r Ads Laxuna III CA 93651 CASE M SU~TT16661, DRCS00J-00849, DRC300J-00848 M v. ! ! i .~ s.rz PLAN 4 PLANS PLANS PLANS PLANS PLAN 4~n..o PLAN < PLAN 2 PLANS PLANS PLAN 3 PLAN ~ • l J RIGHT ELEVATION rn =n PLAN a LEFT ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL PANCPO CUCMIOryGA CALROPtIIA CLIENT K&SPROPERTV LLC CONTACT Mr Kosrow Omidvv 16901 HI¢hwood Cirtl< Ls¢vv W CA 9365) CASE p SU~TT16651, DRC300J-0OBdJ, DRC30h}098d8 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT SCAL¢ 7116" =1'-0" s ~M ee..umm ucvr[cw[ ~ nw.c PLAN d ROOF PLAN ~ r t~ tlJ , 3 ~~ d. ~h i~ ~_~ y FRONT ELEVATION I ~ ^I tlI 4~ LEFT ELEVATION TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL 0.W COO NCAMONC.L GV. V ORm.~ CL~NT K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Kmrow Omidvr 26901 NI¢¢hwood Circle WguvHllb CA 92651 CAg E # SO1STT16651, DRC200J-008p, DRC20pJ-008W RIGHT ELEVATION CABANA Cy~ SCALE 3/16" a 1'-0" ~,~-- mn.wmm ..nrur o. ~~~ ~..+..A~ T A-2T PIRST PLOOR PLAN s _~ ~,- _~ i • i i _ i __ _ - ~~"a ___ _ __ .n+~r "y par ger Oar per ",.~_ . ~ _ ~ ~T.~ L- _ 3. ~ lK - ~ :~. - ~~ ~~ ~ klt F > r klt~ I kl[~ ~ / klt -- -_ , ~ ' ~_~ PF - -- - _ _ tlln tlin ] ~ _+ tlln ! ~ e ~ IN r nh! ~ ~._ . - . +. IN en '" tlln f _ _. PLAN len sp rr TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL RANCHO CUCAMONCA. C.U. VORNIA CLIENT K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Koerow Omidver 36901 DIyhwood Circle W¢uRr 9v6 CA 93651 CASE p SIJf~TT16651, DRC3007-0OStl, DRC300J-0OSdB PLAN1 PLAN1 PLAN) I~D6 Sp Pf ILM Sp {T Illl6p Yr FIRST FLOOR PLAN 6CAL[ N6""1 J" 4-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT ~M e.~n~uwam ..r .w: ~~~~ .w...~.. A-1 m N PLAN J PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN J SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE ]l16"-H TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDffiLL RANC9000CAMOHGA. CALIiOPMA CLIENT K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Kwrow OmldvEr 36901 HI¢¢pwood Clrcle LEpuvi Hllb CA 9S65J CASE N SU~TT16651, DRCS00J-UpMO, DRC300J-OOSiB 4-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT ~~~ umvm .w w ~,~~~ s ~ ~ perO° par ° pers° parry p~s° parF L ---r „ - ~-.e ,~____ .__~ ,~ ~a,7 __ ____~.. ~_ ,.~... ". ~, ____ __ ~ i _. _ _ __ ..~~ ~ ..t __ ___ ~L w`ti.: kit ~\ ~ ~ kl[ ~ ~ kl[. ~ Y~L x y ~ kl(~ " kl( kit r ~ ~~ i ~ -. _ _ ___ .. __a., am mn mn am IN '° ° °' IN IN '° ° °° IN am .... .. IN . °. r ,° .. e, inP °"P .e a IN , .. aln ._. ..s ~ __ .. ._ I i Y._ 1 - _. ._ ~ - _. .. _ ...~ ."~.. .-.. a...~_ ..... ____________ _______ rn W PLAN 7 PLAN 1 un s0 yr IuK Sp i< TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL pwNCAO NCAMONGh Ct,I.IPOkNu CLIENT K&BPROPERTV LLC CONTACT Atr Korrow Omidv~r 269801 RIgbrood Circle CASE p SD~TT16651~DRC200J-0OBdT, DRC2003-00808 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN J Ita sprt It0{$QR 11M Sp rr Ien SpR FD28T FLOOR PLAN SCAL[ M6" ° I J" 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT FACING FOOTHILL BLVD ONLY ~~_ ~.~ ~~~~..o.... ~. A6 1- ~-l ~l , i .. ~ ~ ~ r i i --_ __ a y ^ _ . .. - _ _ _ ___ - L' ~~ -- -` `1 ~E~~ klt ~~ ~ \ klt ~ ~ kl[_ kl[i - k[[~ ~ N klt am am ain aen° IN ' ° '-°' IN IN IN IN .., .a a ,. IN ~.. .. e'a ' - ~i . <. ~~C11 __ - _____ -_- ~ _ e.s ..w ran ..a. ___ er .. r ' rn =r, y PLAN J lu]6Q rr TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL PANCIIO NCAMONCA, CALIFORMA CLIENT K&SPROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Kmrow Omidvv 36901 fllpAnood Clrclc La¢oea Hill CA 91651 CASE k SI1~TT16651, DRC2001-008d], DRC100J-OOBdB PLANT PLANT PLANT PLAN1 PLANJ 1106 sQ Fr tat sp Pr IMf 6p rt IYf 6Q rt Ian 6p rt F[RST FLOOR PLAN 6CAll 116' ° I ~^ 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT (~1 TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL PLAN 3 PLANT PLANT PLANT SECOND FLOOR PLAN 6CAL[ YIP ~ 1 i' PANCnO N[AMOXCA. CALffOPn1A CLR!NT K & 8 PROPERTY LLC 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT CON7ACf OU Kosrow Omltlver 36901 R Awood Cirel< LeQane N CA 92657 CASE A SUBTT16651, DACTOOJ-0081), DRC200J-00848 PLAN 1 PLAN J ~~~.r-- e ~.le~m .r ~..~. ...w ~~~ ,u.u.. ~. e.. A-10 TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL MNCl10 CUCAMONCh C.V.Ii0U11A CLIENT K @ S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Koerow Omidver 26901 HI¢¢M1wood Clrcle La¢unv Ii18e CA 9265] CASE % SU~TT16651, DRC2007-0080, DRC200J-00848 i PLANT PLANT u~sOrt PLANT wEQrt ut sQ rt THIRD FLOOR PLAN 6CALE ylf^~1-0^ 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/LOFT OPTIONS e wwfvaa~m un~rtc~~: 4Y: v.w~ ~'-~+w~. ~.. A-II i rn =n TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL qAN C00 CUCAMONG.~. CLL V OYHIA CLIENT K~SPROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Ko~row Omidvv ]6901 RI¢Anood Clrcle W eun~ Hlllr, CA 95653 CASE # SUBTT16631, ORCI003-0OSC], DRCi003-00818 PLAN 0 PLAN S PLAN2 PLANT GROUND FLOOR PLAN SC.UL Nf•-14' 4-PLEX UPffiLL PRODUCT CY /~~- errm_ _m ..mrznue ~ n..wc m ~ nk nk ~ ktt '~ kit ism ~ ... a ... _ rem e -klt ~ klt °-~°~ am i .-I ~, 1 am ~...I_ 'sl .- . .- .~ ~q~ "~~ ~ ~~ IN IN _~ ~ ~~ IN ~~ Ilv 1 i -~ I PLANd Im sQ rt TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDffiLL lurvrno cuc.vnonc~, cuo-'ocmn CLIENT K k S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Korrow Omiaver 569¢e01 elghwma Cirtle CASEq SII~TTI6681~DRC3003-008d7, DRC300J-008/8 PLANS PLAN 3 PLAN d 1{x s0rt IwsOn 1+v sR rr FDiSf FLOOR PLAN SCALL HI{` -1 ~` 4-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT m ..c,.rtr,urc { nww ..~:~~~~ uru.,.d A-16 • . • i ~ rn PLAN d PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN d SECOND FLOOR PLAN TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL PANC90 NGMONGA CAL60RNIA CLIENT K & 5 PROPERTY LLC CONTALT Mr Korrow Omlever 16901 RlQhwood Circle Le¢uvv lilll15~,, CA 93653 CASE 0 8URTT16651, DRC200J-008tl, DRC200J-00808 4-PLEX UPHII.L PRODUCT eeoam ..mrm Ye~~T ,.:~ ~ ...~,..~.,~ A-17 r r'~r` V i _ _ r ~ %~s.i er rs 4''_ _~~a-'r: '. ri. lz"_ __ _ _i7;. ___ _ 7i ,~: ."_ c~_ __ c«~-,';g ;.i £.. l~ 1 y m' %x . 2-qer per Z-w eper 2-oer per Y-oe tiger 2-o =r per t-aar per .. v rev ~' _ ~ ,~ -- I w ~y-..~ _ ii '1-'m 1-oar per "" ~ 1-aSr per t.oer gar 1-ear pm t-oar ger ;- ~ 1 em gm PLAN 4 TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL RANCNO CUCAMONGA C.W V OPNI.e CLIENT K k S PROPERTY LLC CONTA gCgT Mr Kosrow Omldvar Le ua~H15 eCA 9 653 C g E N SU~TTt6631, DRCS00J-0OBdT, DRC200J-00845 PLAN 3 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN scu.e ms^. ra, 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT PLAN 3 PLAN 4 -- -, ~Li ~~~_ oweuruwmm ..m~r~ . n...w ..~.: ~ ...,... ~.~ .. A31 • i ~ • • s rn PLAN 1 wU 6Q R TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL pANCBO NUMOXCA CALIiO0.M.{ CLIENT K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT Mr Korrow UmiEYR ~69g0I~Rlgbw{,ooC 9i65J CASE p NRSU6TT16651, DRCI007-0080'!, DRC300J-008<e PLANT PLANT PLANS PLANS PLANT 1{p6Q FT 16M SQ R IHO SQ R 16N SQ R IfU SQ R FR3ST FLOOR PLAN scels an{^-ra. 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT rn =~ N PLAN < PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 1 TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL uvcxo cuwnonc,~. c..uronnu CLIENT K A S PROPERTY LLC CONPACf Mr Kmmw OmMvrr 369¢¢0uu1 HI¢¢bwaod Cirtlc CASE% SDU~TT16651~DRC300]-0OStl, DRC300J-0U81E SECOND FLOOR PLAN seu.e vie•-~ a• 6-PLEX UPffiLL PRODUCT • (~/_ _ moomrnx.n..w o.. ~ ~ ..~.... ~, T A iJ i Lr a1M°InR\ ,°.r ' Ir.: .mu ~ ou ~ . ..°. W~•r w ~~°w°.°° ,. ~. `~ .. ~.rs~ LEGEND - U - UPHILL u~,l[i!6U F_FL,,T NUMBER OF UNNS rn ~~ y' e uaow ARFaoev Ac ~ ~ Ti~SCA A'C- _- RECREATION AREA ° POOL ° CABANA MAIN PROJECT ENTRY - ° GATE ~ ° LANDSCAPE MONUMENTATION VILL~S~R• - OPEN °TOT b-PLE%UPNILL ° ]TOTAL BUILDMGS ° 42 TOTAL UNITS 4-PLE%UPNILL - ° 1 TOTAL BUILDMG ° 4TOTAL UNITS v ~ f i~x - •_ le ux - -_ -__ ___ -'P /lll IS - r / 11 6F 1 '__ O~ONOA CALR'OPNIA -~TJ~ ~r - ~ CLIENT K & S PROPERTY LLC _ TUAL PHA~S-IINS CONTACT Mr Korrow Omldvv 26901 RlggBwaed Circle ". l0'-0" Leyune N116 CA 9269 DRC200J-00847, DRC200J-00848 CAt Ep 8U~TT16651, - 1 jK J / ~' W ~ sa ~ /~YY ~ ~~y ~T JT~-i~ ° t ,,~/i e'llw~ ~- ~. i ~ / i // i 3 ~ ~ i~L;° .Ilw % ~~ ya ~ 7 6 _ ~:; ~'~ 6 G 4 Lly--- b PLEX FLAT / ]TOTAL BUR.DMGS ° 42 TOTAL UNITS ~~- d-PLEX FLAT °ITOTAL BULLDMG ° 4 TOTAL UNITS MAIL KIOSK DECELLERATION LAN E EMERGENCY ACCESS SCE EASEMENT ~ !~ P-J bOT~FP~P~~€/i8--- -- ~ CRT APIAO4 EO FIXYFIIILI AIFNUERRC ETTRFE$ ~ PFu. Lvea Ah¢an Srmx • ® n,l,nm.armwbn I,.wm ham r,+. ' }}} ++ +yy~ linu•+'+nnrunvi. tan+rvl•lanrl l`Ini FVFRCRCCN fnNOPY SI FCIMEN TP4F O4 rtump.rn Prvi11n.OLveLm Quarcu•aynlaL+ Cnerllna Oak 4nm+,. mnua c.nmr++.o Rpp, ~O PVt0.CPCFN UNOIY bTREET FREC rne~.,am••waolm, FrmRre ~ Gvum+mun+umPMna ~++mn. m+xm famr6+`Lm cMdm+la rrrr., O UP0.1fIR EVFR[-REFN TREE . BrnrnvrM1ihn l.ryyilmv hnrle Tme Arnmm Nar N n/a Ismv. mnll a Flaale+l ralwrbar4 ® UrPI<HI DFCIDUOUSTRLf nln.a,nnmbnm~` wnm nln~r nr~mrmtr+m e,npn.., u+np nrr rmnma, nemmna Inndnnnm. Irtn O DFCIOUWSpLOWFRINC nCCENCTRE6 Iegvnbiwmm iM¢a Cnpr MYrcle 0 VCPTICAL ACCCM IRCE Cup.raaw rniperv+rau Cypar 1.1 V SHRUB PALETPF K.mrepa++.l a~pRr.me anrm PaneN wn,k+ng lh.w,np may +rclWebm a+e rxx hmnrd m W IMIm+mP Ln I AkuM UVJV 5mwbaary Trtt oaNaa purpurev. orcbM Pru+m. Lmlinreia anatne GilleNu Haenwek nbmdnlln L+ym IGlnnanr+e pnnau qrt Planl Liurm nubeo Swml bay t..anema a+„anaa spaNab Laaemle+ Myrsire nlneana • Alnan &nwrc-0 Nermm MearNU geaMv (kmanNm lraprana Swa~l Olrve 141aapm,um nprcral G.am~m I'bbm+a lruvn•u M++ulem Sge n N le fie Rrsma nu +(Irc+nal+a ry ~.Iv~. g+agR+l puNmn Gpe Thymus aeryyllum fm}ung TFyme w~alme n~.~nnne. wmma TURF APPAS ~SIIRUP ANp GROUNFKOVFR AR6A5 F;a3~ POSE GARDEN FOOTHILL AVENUE LANDSCAPE SUMMARY a OF 1AEL~PEWIRED SY Area M19 gana Atief YA fms sW.ad as sbmrr+ IR4minMmn Nbe Jfi-Rna .n IIIYmin alTrees NCa 3s-&+v .l) Mlk. max MTam mbelSCallu+ N3 AMENUY SUMMARY 9f,minlwl M1ammino ngoiM I Rn165pa z Pa Rmm w,en sbaeeoban. 3 TM Id a Rme Gadm rnmlJ) Olm apse mdn wiN Mad anade ahu[aur< pa++c unlra am wne<ee FIJ Ifil4aeng Nvln COQ iN(~CEPTT~UiAL~L)ANDSCAPE MASTER rPLAN TUSCANY Y~SAT RE~I~IILL RANCNOCUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA K&SPROPERTYL~ FE ~TURE MFG~ND~ n.am rx"m~.a*v n.u.m..rm l..a wa,.+r ~•c+am..+..aa.r.r..rn a a....++.•...a...rm.m.a.a.m.+.m..+a, r•h+•-.,r... a,r.Mmn : er.+... a..e....w mrr.aa,.m.wnas p......nn T.. n w,r.m..w.m.~...m,+r.d.,+...a.~ra.raa l..<.m.... a n+...ar..a+m.,.~..ie.ia,m.u....,r. m...l.a..... ahr.b n`r-m.-r ..an+r4« .h. ir..a.m... r,.... w.r. a.wwar,a,a+.. ~.n-~m lr.wan.xmah +o ..a•..m.x,.r,,...,.rp.a•..I...na~o ++ ov....nwh..n.i.h.r.w..n..rm~ m+l....m....nh rs rc.a+.ea..romn.rcra ... •..~wa..++..a. ...m. n n mxwrM •^e•r• D o+...,a„„.alm..r.b.w.no-+n...rrr•+.-. +. Ir Nanrn.aena~.+...n. ra... n i.+lu.fpq.,rpymna wAOnr¢.wmn.,aRan.ps•e r (M~`Wntln.+n6...wr.ndme.rtMtlaAadaldtlr~..a N+ualnNbxaa+.. +e rk.W b.+grnwlaann M.+m l..n.nlMl.+w m 6unra~ntlnnn. n.M. 11 umwa.ofayuha.mna.mmn.../•m.~m+a.a~..nrm II III a ci ww.n.nw amxull n.mnnmlmm....N^• i+ r.m+n a mm OB[naE ••. n ufwni•`n ~ V[YaELi1IPE ]r amf+Nm.unv.n•.m.mT S 9REwG a, r.`.~r~ro.~.rv,h.m.lm.,u~e•ea,...,am 4 - ~. le I. MrNmm.. w.a. im.,•..Ten." _ _m.. ... .. n w.. r.a..r n.+.,„ ~ L-I eW~LL ND FIPR$ - ~ - - -_ A LOPFN VICW Ft NCC 1 -- 1 iuVim unninwrv. mn~m~nr nnmmn m _~ (V V •I ~~OPEN VIEW FFNfyE~WRH PIIASTFR51~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~'~ . ~~~~ q. i~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 C - I , - ,_.; ' ~ - - _ 'ONCEPTUAL WALL A(N~ D I"ENCE PLAN rUSI-.AIV 1 VILLAJ AT ~E~ HILL RANCIIO CIICAMONGA CALIFORNIA K&SPROPERTY LLC -. .e-.~.y.1 ..~ 1 y, Q ~ / ~~~ (Zl 1. ~~ ~„ FEATURE LECEN6 Q rrm me..mi n,.. xn.,~~~e....~.u...,~iwne OI C nYeN Vami.g4M'tlknp'nniMlm m~6mely lnoenu quMem wen~n~lo etc ~~ ,I III E.x U9 p.VF L '~- ~ C \VENWRA REEAWING WALLS15fFM / C ...~... ~ ...... .. .......r~~i :.'•tlfn DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 30 p m Warren Morelion January 6, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivision for condominwm purposes on 6 90 acres of land m the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 ofthe Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 Related Files Pre-Application Rewew DRC2002-00441, Development Rewew DRC2003-00847, Vanance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) -The design rewew of building elevations and detailed site plan for 92 condominiums consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A request to increase the maximum building height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area, for a proposed 92 condominwms on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard- Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 Background On March 19, 2003, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2002-00001, Development Distract Amendment DRC2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00001, to change the land use and zoning of the site from Office to Mixed Use to allowfor Office and/or Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units peracre) Under the Medwm Residential component (100 percent of the site) up to 96 units may be permitted The applicant is proposing 92 attached condominiums on the site Deswn Parameters The 6 9 acre site is vacant and slopes southerly an average of approximately 4-5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of the site where the slopes exceed 25 percent The site is triangular in shape with several scattered mature trees and a Eucalyptus windrow at the southwest end The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard The structures have been deemed non-historic The site is bordered by the Paafic Electric Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land followed bysingle-family development and a trailer park to the south, the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Center to the east, and vacant land to the west Access into the site is from Foothill Boulevard At aPre-Application rewew meeting dated May 28, 2003, the Planning Commission stressed to the applicant that it was important that the vacant land between the site and Foothill Boulevard be incorporated m the overall project design even though the property is off-site The applicant is proposing to develop 92 attached condominiums on the site The protect will include two 4-plexs, fourteen 6-plexs, and a recreation center with a pool and spa for use by residents of the propped private community The condominwms will be comprised of an "uphill" and "flat" building product, each with two separate floor plans The "uphill" product will include 1,650 and 1,923 square foot units with 228 and 349 square foot courtyards, respectively The "flat" budding product will include 1,406 and 1,857 square foot units with 244 and 225 square foot courtyards, respectively The larger units are proposed at the ends of each bulding product The 6-plex "flat" product is proposed with a 442 square foot third story loft option The condominwms and recreation Exh'~b;~ ''~`' ~tF,G~ DRC ACTION AGENDA TT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING January 6, 2004 Page 2 center bwldmg are designed with stucco and stone veneer exterior The stone veneer is incorporated as a wainscot treatment on parts of the buildings and around the bwldmg entries The "flat" bwiding product incorporates substantially less stone veneer on the bwldmg exterior than the "uphill" product Other elements on the bwldings include stucco trim, shutters, corbels, and wrought iron railings The design of the bwidings exceed the 30-foot maximum bwldmg height allowed in the hillside district As proposed, the "uphill" product will exceed the height on a small portion of the roofline on the downhill (garage) side of the buildings, and the "flat" will exceed the height on a small section along the ndgeline for those buildings that include the loft option The applicant has submitted a variance application requesting relief from the 30-foot maximum bwldmg height regwrement Because of the location and limited amount of areas of the bwldings that exceed the height limitations, staff does not feel the bwldmg design would have a negative visual impact Included in the variance request is a request to extend the maximum retaining wall height from 4 feet to approximately 12 feet to accommodate a wall at the northeast comer of the site The applicant is requesting to use a "Vendura" retaining wall system design Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 Building Architecture -The bwldmg architecture should be enhanced to a level that would warrant the location of the protect along Foothill Boulevard To do so, the bwldmg architecture should be enhance by incorporating additional shutters, wrought iron trellis and otherfeatures, and additional decorative treatments to create a 360-degree architectural theme In addition, a substantial amount of rock treatment should be added to the buildings, especally the "uphill" bwldmg product which has substantially less stone m its design than the "flat" bwldmg product Those buildings fronting Foothill Boulevard should be especially enhanced above the rest of the mfdl buildings because of their location. Parking -The protect exceeds the City's minimum guest parking spaces by 2 spaces, however, recently completed comparable multi-family protects in the City have found that the City's minimum standards do not provide enough surface parking and created overspill illegal parking onto public streets (Note The number of guest spaces provided m Parking Summary Table on Site Plan is incorrect The correct number is 25 spaces provided versus 23 required) 3 The western half of the protect site is setback from an existing Foothill Boulevard right-of-way and vacant parcel (APN 0207-101-13) that fronts on Foothill Boulevard Per the direction of the Planning Commission from the May 28, 2003, Pre-Application Workshop, the adtoining property along Foothill Boulevard should be incorporated into the protect design as landscaping The Committee and staff feel that if the vacant land were left to be undeveloped in front of the protect site, it would diminish the visual appearance of the overall protect Staff has been working with the applicant and the adtoining landowner regarding this issue . Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Cabana Architecture -The architectural design of the cabana is very plain and should be revised to incorporate many of the design elements and architectural features of the other buildings This would include a defined entry on the north side of the bwldmg, and possibly a DRC ACTION AGENDA TT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING January 6, 2004 Page 3 fake entry or enhanced design on the south side of the building for appearance purposes, in addition to the other features mentioned above Additionally, the proposed fence on the south side of the building should be designed not to obstruct the bulling as it is viewed from the south Therefore, suggest ending the fence at the southwest and southeast comers of the bulling Route 66 -The streetscape of the protect should include elements celebrating the histonc Route 66 pursuant to the design concepts of the Foothill Boulevard Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Pian for suburban parkways, including meandenng sidewalk and informal drifts of London Planes, California Sycamores, and Purple Plum trees (not Canary Island Pine and Afncan Sumac) See attached for a copy outlining the typical suburban parkway design 3 Landscaping -Provide planters between garage doors and functional pot shelves on some upstairs windows to soften the 3-story Rear Elevations 4 Design interior private open space areas so they are enclosed by solid decorative block In the areas along Foothill Boulevard and Red Hili Country Club Drive, the walls may have to be designed for sound attenuation The final design of the walls shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner 5 Stone pilasters used on the penmeter, the wrought iron fence, and entry monument shall be a minimum of 30 inches by 30 inches in size 6 Stone plasters used on the courtyard fencing, pool fencing, and retaining seatwalls shall be a minimum of 24 inches by 24 inches in size 7 Windows should be provided in all garage doors to allow the Homeowners Assoaation to quickly ascertain whether garages are being used for storage instead of vehicle parking This is an important component of parking enforcement Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion Mal kiosks should be provided throughout protect or centralized in the Cabana If detached, they should be designed in the same architectural style Garage door designs should vary, such as in pairs Design Review Committee Action Members Present Pam Steward, Cristine McPhal, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Warren Morelion The Design Review Committee reviewed the protect and recommended it return to the January 20, 2004, meeting after it has been revised to address the Committee's comments The Committee stressed to the applicant the location of the site and the importance of a quality protect • The Committee believed that the proposed bulling design should be revised to represent a true "Tuscany" architectural style The buldng design should include elements such as, but not limited to, the following EI~`^ DRC ACTION AGENDA TT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • January 6, 2004 Page 4 Architecture Provide a substantial amount of additional stone treatment to all bwlding elevations The buildings visible from Foothill Boulevard should especially be enhanced with stone 2 Revise stucco color so it has a softer color pallete 3 Replace proposed wrought iron balcony and courtyard railings with railings that are more consistent with a 'Tuscany" architectural theme/style Provide gnll work on windows 5 Add additional shutters and other architectural elements consistent with a 'Tuscany" architectural theme/style Enhance architecture on the rear (garage side) of those buildings (Building 1 and 2) that are visible from Foothill Boulevard Enhance cabana architectural design so it has the same quality of design (revised) as the condominium buildings • In addition, the Committee agreed with staff that there was insufficient amount of visitor parking on the site The Committee explained that although the project meets the amount of visitor parking required, the location of the protect does not allow for any off-site parking overflow because it is isolated and adtacent to Foothill Boulevard The Committee explained that they wanted to make sure that there would be no parking issues for the protect in the future The committee recommended the following Parkin Provide additional visitor parking Suggest a minimum of 1 space for every 3 condominium units 2 Provide visitor parking closer to the pool and area Lastly, the Committee also asked the developer to work with the adtacent property owner to resolve the vacant property issue in front of the protect site • E,F,G~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 30 P M Warren Morelion January 20, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivision for condominwm purposes on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Development Review DRC2003-00847, Vanance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 92 condominwms consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters on 6 90 acres of land m the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distncts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A request to increase the maximum building height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area, for a proposed 92 condominiums on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard- Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distncts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 207-101-32, 33, 50 Background At the January 6, 2004, DRC meeting, the Committee reviewed the protect and • recommended it return to the next meeting with corrections The Committee asked the developerto revise the protect to reflect the attached action comments The Committee requested revised plans be presented at this meeting for revew PLANS AVAILABLE AT MEETING Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Design Review Committee forward the protect to the Planning Commission for approval subtect to addressing all of the issues outlined in the attached January 6, 2004, DRC Action Comments Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner Warren Morelion Members Present Richard Fletcher, Cristine McPhail, Nancy Fong The Design Review Committee reviewed the protect again and was happy with all of the applicant's revisions The applicant redesigned the protect to incorporate a more'Tuscany" architectural design by adding additional stone treatment, shutters, window tnm, iron elements, a softer color palette, and landscaping around the buildings In addition, the pool house was redesign to include an enhanced entry, additional stone, shutters, and iron elements The parking issue was addressed by adding an additional 7 guest parking spaces to the site Two of the spaces were added near the pool house in a parallel parking design A staircase was also added between Buildings 15 and 16 to allow better pedestrian access to the pool area The applicant agreed to continue to work with the adtacent property owner to incorporate the vacant property in front of the site into the protect design The Committee recommended the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval with no additional comments or corrections ~xh~bi~' ~1~,~ E,F,G y0 City of Random Cucananga Planning Dmson Isost an-riso USG, Iwo ~- OM I (~V~~- ~~o I ~-1-i6t-hwr~v~ Li~~ LI~~vNA N i t,~s ti C~ . a~ zS~53 Name 8 Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor xh~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or prfnt clearly using ink Use fhe fah key to move from one Itne to fhe next Ilne.) 'rTFie,pp~pose,of this°for"m;is to;inform the City of the basic components,of the proposed--_ project so that the Ctty may review ihe.project pursuanbto,City~Polictes, Ordinerices,aand~= Guidelines,;ythey-Californiav'EnGiroririientalrrQuality:,Aci;;; and the=Citys_~Rulesp ands= -Proceduresito~lmplement CEQA y It is tm~ortant that the~irifo~mation requested;ii%this,:z „ ~h s,~°i--~"" ~ ~iiy ~, sSi _ t" '-=- 1 .~~#,ti p;'" F-~ ~~-. -fro,,.,~'.n -3~',". :c.. - r. Y ~ ma=r ,e:_ ~.~ -~- a Itcation 1ie_ rovliie_d in~full '~- ' ~'"-~~P:=ti - _ °~~= " "' 6 ~'pp~ ~~~~~~~~7e°~fr~'.~S'.Jt~: 'f~~~x' ~ ':-°ci~f ~~~~;`~..~~~ ~,~c-, ~~i;3~W_y sa~_ ,r:~k- 3~~~~= y Upon~._reviewofhe~completedi,InitiahStudy~Pant, land,the,,rtievelopm•ent,~appl~cation ~,~additionalmf~ormattorisuch as; bui nothmtted to; traffic; nsOlse, biologics~1;~}dr~amag'e~and;.„~,, ~,geologica reports,may be regwred ,The protect application virillinot be tleemetl~complete~~~ finless tf fie~idieiiied~specal~studies%repo'rtsare~su'bmttted:for<_review'ahd~ac ec pted~as~; t{`+is.: °•'AM`~S'-' :w5 „,~;s; ""hi+.. '~n+'"^a}a .~> ~'R..?~~;~t~y'w° d;.;s s..-x'su. ~~Fk~;.:+.~tr5 ,nr-~.'p`q'~'Y^".'Y.«~: S`-'"'k;.'3*,:~'"'~•„s~'q'm„.s~r.~~`t: "~Fr+_ix°~s,'3"r~' ~complete~anda~ eq_uat'e~~Theprotect=applicafionzwtll~not~tleach`etluled~for~omm~t[e~es~.~: -~'~GaQ'f~ ~a s+"'?~r~'~.s~+k~:~~-,. ~"yl,~+r"r.~' .; .-a='°°-' re*,t ^S=$+..~r::,.,;:,•° ^3~,."~". ~i~,g„r^v.:>,.~ r 1.{`~a ~review,~u niess~alf~r~equtred~;"reports}aFe submitte~ and_,deemed~oomplete~for~staff~to_.V r~prepa~e~thexlnt„~tie~Study~YPart Il;aswrequt~red~tijt~CEQA'~:Inzaddit~o n~o£ th~ftling"•f,~ee;~th r apPlica~nt wtll~res'ponstble to.pay, orreimbu~rse„the City; its ag ts~-~~of~icers ^a ~or"s ;wconsulta ts-ior~aU<cost~for~~tFie;,~pieparation;'revie_w,,,analysts;rrecommendatlons,~ > rL <:;~u ~r ~ ~ b°-~ .,..~> .;C- 'a :i .-- ~=5;s.'¢~ty. -mac- -i "i ~-r,'..- a .. e~ Z' ~'miii attons;~etc ~,of aiiy'sPecial studtes,orrepo'rts:~s -"~~ ~~~ ~' ~r.~ ,~? `"_4~.. F ,rv ~•=~~n~'-a~^'-`~ .`~".'. , ~;•: c.~5:r 3,-,,"~rrG'~.£:a.-~n_ w s',.ti ,.~o'~`y _tiYvi:'~K"`~.5..._~ ~',-iti ~ ' ~ AppUcahon Number /or the protect to which this /orm pertains ~~~ I I I ~O ~p 5 ~(+-G 2003 - OOg~1 ~ ~L 2ov3 - do ~ t~-g Proled rne• ~ U~ Glki.1 `( V I L ~kh ~ 'P-~Di-F I L~ Name 8 Address o/protect owner(s)- I- i•{ I ~PLANNING~FINAL~FORM3~f:0UNiER~EnvironmenfallnloFonnl docPage 1 of 10 Rev 6/30/03 INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbilay of [he applicant to ensure that the appkcahon is complete at the bme of submittal, City staf/ will not be available to perform work required to provide missing lnformahon Contact Person & Address Izv N ~~ C ~~~~~ D C~ ~jtio0~ Name & Address of person preparing this loan (d different from above) Telephone Number ~/) 2) ~`r5 - b°1~'~ 3) Pro/ed Locauon (describe) -_ -' _ -N Q~-T ~ ~j l ~~ Q~ ~(]U'~ ~ I L ~. Y L~ ~ , /~ r(~ . ~MMEDIP~I~`( W~~i'r O1: CUGAMn~~t~/k G(~~1~ GNANN~I~~ ~ocrr+~ o f ~vr1-r~~r~ wa i ~w~Y W. o w 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach add~6onal sheet if necessary) ~~ ~~- col - ~Z ~ 33 ~ ~0 'S) Gross site Area (adsq IL) ~ , of ~i '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o/ public streets & proposed ded~cabons) ~/ ~ " I 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or mne change which would affect the protect site (attach addrt~onal sheet if necessary) ~,F, ~ yZ I ~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~EnvnonmentallnfoForml docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3130/03 In/ormation indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless othennse requested by stall 8) Include a description olall permits which will be necessary from the City o(Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect i QP-~DI N(r pf=~l N~y~l~ ~~ (ZMI ; ~ ~~1`ft~`'.-~ ~ M~~(il~V~f~'~ ~^f'i" P~ ~ i ~t,,i~,uiN~, ~~12Mir/ ~Mo~iTioN ~ ~;r~r~li-r ~ C'o. rwoD C-d N T fw ~- ?'~I~-N1' T 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including rnformahon on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condi0onJ and the use o/the structures Attach photographs ofsignificant /eatures described In addition, cite all sources of information (i e , geological and/orhydrologicstudies, biohcand archeological surveys, traffic sfud~es) -~ ~ i~ i~ V~(`r( rtiN T~ MO5 j P~-fyT . S. 5 ~~ ~ TIC S~~ 5~~ ~T .k~~°iw><. Q-•/, ~(wr~ F~fxt~ 1`b f2vN 1.2 ~G (~oNT/kiN`7 h~M~ Sl,(}p~Gi C9(1~>//k~`E`(-~ T!-IAN ~d°A . "rl-~ roM7uND GoJF:Iv 15 N~STiW ~R.a,sS~~i AN(> SC~ut~ g;k,~ No ~NiMa~ N~riITATS ~ OISSLf-VeD Nn~'(.~I 1~v~°~TY UN~ Ih p~oJNp~-D tom( A~ I,~DS~ 1 U ,~ ~o(~M~-~' Iv~i TWA`( (LibC-+~"-~-W4'r ~~1~ I G V I ~w l ~ f~~A I (~!~(~lk~i '~P'Of"~ TNT `' l"i'l: T~ t 4~ sou-r}~ ~ ~AzS ~~ND W>;~. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o/the site Cde all sources ofrnformahon (books, published reports and oral history) ~("~-rid ~~i'~ ~~ /~ATAC~NT `~ tN-~ ~on-~~i~L 'i~LUD b I STP-1 ~ T ( N'I `'`~(~ L t~ u'(~ bb E,F,~ ~3 I \PLANNING\FlNAL\FORMS\COUN7ER\EnvtronmentallnfoFonnt docPage 3 of 10 Rev 6130/03 1l) Descnbe anynorse sources and thenlevels that now a//ect the site (arrcratt, roadwayno~se, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses ~v,AOWAY Nol ~ ~P'~M ~vvt"Ni~J~ ~W~ , wtvt, f'~~ N11 T I (p ~T ~ ~ '~Y 4~DC> GII`C~ }JO (91.~2If~tG ~ FYI(- V N ~ ~5 ~ Fo N i I N (off A'wN(~ ' ~~orl~ I I.~- P.~yD , 12) Descnhe [he proposed protect in detail Thls should provide an adequate descnphon o1 the sde rn terms o/ultimate use that will result /rom the proposed protect Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the ant~clpated completion o/each increment Attach additional sheet(s) rl necessary N~a N Y Vi ~~~ ~ R-~ N i ~,~.- i 5 f~~~,n ~s ~ Z C-rt~~ `7fbR-Y ~fUWN~M~-j ~2 UN~'~S Ur/'~~ ~ij~.5 ~nr(nVs 1'x^1 ±~y-oo ~.~ -~ I,q~~ S.F. ~~ wil,~ I~~ ~ fiYf~s of ~ui~lt~lCs `I'-~t,~X ~~ ~ b-~P~`X t'~ 4 -i'~ t,a~~}I~~ I {{N~ b-~(-Rc v~l,~- T~~ ,~ V~x~l~-rY of I''>:Ufl'~=~T~uN~ ,~sn~wifii~ ~uGtl As ~w~ S1°/h I fifes- l.©r I~kWN aCY~/~ CAA NA 1 P~~? A~~ ` <t Nr> ~~Gm N~ Ar»!~: Pn~vJ~-t Y~wip~ 'f~t~T~ c~ zIS 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including rn/ormation on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/ land use (residential, commerolal, etc ), intensity of land use (one-/amdy, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc) Noll-~ - P~P~ANDOc~~h wit, iy. y w . ,~N9 l.cw D~`~~i~-~ (~`~I~~NTf ~- ~ ~~ ~ ~l,tiyD GIr/'(YVV(~ GNo.NNIi~, (>,ND R~l~~-'rLiUNh ciNv~lt~k W~ - -ptlPx,iG t~Nr~ R 5aU11"fi - N~DIUM, ~N~•~ r `( f J ~4'J {~M~~ • 14) III [he proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area o/the pro/ect~ ~ 1'I~ SC/,i~i 0~ r\M1~/~ W l Ll, f~lp'r ~ f1N~D , Ti/€ ~W N ~N'~ .~N~S~-~1' wl~ ~~ A~So(~-~~D f~Y TNL~ A~/~ ,o~ND ~s (1'~` `~ I DL ~ ? ~ AL C N ~,~-A-~ I~ w i c,~ ~i ~ ~~ f~1 f~N ~ . E, F, G 4y I API.ANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~EnrtronmenfallnfoForml docPage 4 of 10 Rev 6/30N3 15) Indicate the type olshort-term and long-term nose to be generated, including source and amount How will these nose levels aflect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed l'Jcn-c~~,n, ~- (,rf~N~,1 f`t/uf i ocJ Nu'~~ ~,,~ ~r~' G C.~ f•~ 1~=~i p~~ i r~~l ~F~ ~~i~ti ~>~ Miilh~fl:D 6`( NP~~~(~"L 'NPoI~P-A~%;.,~ SGI~l2-r.il,N~, ~ S7~~Db r-(TC Fip~` P7~~-(il~(l~ .PND -1~1TAtJ Cam- f fWtJ1 Ali I ~i °i0U(+-~1~ rD 5~1~-1~OUN~~~ N~ V`~~j 'i6) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o1 mature orscemc trees "~`{l'`~ ~ S fJJ (V\/k'~1/ (4~ ~(~ S~cJ~G TNt,`~,c, oN S 1'f~ 17) Indicate any bodes o/ water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Gi~M/I '(ZV~ -~ F ~ M ~. ~y~ DI ~~ ~ Y~'~ 1~i ~I AtP~ ~11~5 ~t~TD C~C,AMvN~ac C~~ cyfFNN~. Lb 4~o~x q'v goo ~/px q2 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) = -7 ~, bU0 fi ( ~ b CommerolaUlnd (gaUday/ac) ~ (~~ U Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~ Sewer 18) Indicate expected amount o/ water usage (See Attachment A /or usage eshmates) For further clanlicahon, please ntact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 I/ septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests 1/discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expecteddadysewagegenerat~on (SeeAttachmentAtorusageeshmates) For furtherclanficahon,pleasecontactthe Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) ~O ~ / DA / ~ ~ L J ~~'~~ DD ~' b CommeroiaUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/ residential units v Detached (indicate range of parcel saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) ~(/ ~' ~J A~ V (`/ 1 ~~ E,F,a y5 1 ~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMSCOUNTER~EnrlronmenfallntoFonnl docPage 5 of 70 Rev 6130/03 21) Anticipated range o(sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ ~~~ W ~ to $ ~r7~~V _ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specdy number of bedrooms by unit type ~(.,gN I - ~ ~- p~~ ti - 2 P~tti- p t~N '3 - '~i t~R- 23) Indicate anGC~pated household size by unit type P~,tirJ ~v - 3 TNtI,~ ~~~I~~ 5 " ~ C~t1 P ~~ `-f' `~' i'oU' 24) Indicate the expected number o/school children who wilt be res~dmg wrthm the protect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary: b Jurnor High _ c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major /unct~on(s) of commeraal, mdustnal or msGtuGonal uses 26) Total floor area o/ commeraal, mdustnal, or mshtut~onal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Number of employees • • Total Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shin i I ~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~EnvinximentallnfoForml docPage 6 of 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ L71 \ W Rev 6/30/03 29) Provide breakdown ofanticipatedlobciassifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication olthe rate of hire for each classif~cahon (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City '31) For commeroial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct, at (B 18) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, (re, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed profect~ 11 so, please indicate their response ,~w A'~~U~ }1av~ 1N~~~nr'~ THE NE1,~=SSr-~(~-v~ V`f t ti`c`-( t~novi 5~~atJ S Wi w ~ ,6cV/~~ ~A~l~ TU `I~'1 i5 f~~. 33) In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, rad~oactrve substances, pest~ades and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, end other flammable liquids andgases Also note underground storage olany olthe above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, !f known NoN ~ . 1 \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnWronmen1a11nfoForml docPage 7 of 10 ~ ~ ~\ v` `~ Rev 6/30N3 34) Will the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous andror toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above l/yes, provide an inventory o/all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o1 such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans N 1 hereby certity that the statements lumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inlormahon required (or adequate evaluation of this protect to the best ofmy ability, that the /aces, statements, and information presented are true and coned tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date 2 l l D Signature ~~~ti~L~t. /! ~~~ Title. ~,.r ~ S r 9~'rvi,ri-•%fF4 r:'-'~-- I \PIANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnvlmnmenlallnfoFonnl docPage 8 of 10 L I ~\ ~ y~ Rev. 6/30/03 ~J INDEX MAP 1 ~ `... .a I wal 1 • '' ~Welh ~aa 1\ ~ I< _5• A v ''r ~ _ j • 615E IaSa I Well- r II 51 x o ~~. W~ me ~ u 44 ~ i .._ 8 , .. ~o , - ' ,.Alta L `ma _-__ ~ {-;-g- -'~ .~ _ _ ~~- ~~- ~ >: 1.1\!__ N"~ M 1 ' r(: -y ~ - ROAD ~I. ~ i o . gllllll = - ~~~ ~qJ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~aQ/ II ~ / _~ t = ~J° Js 6 ~ ~Wa IA '• • • ~ ~ I M { I a FOOS i ~• %X ~ Trmler/~!~ ~ ] .1 LOr ~rl 1 ~ Z tl: S 1 ~ IrO ] F - Jr S y~•t~ a -.:•:. - tl • 9TM - •• -- !jl lr{p •F = I' R~TOwerso ',~ ~ + J = pL~/~_R~h SK1o •• ^ _ L~ PGA ,g '-- /y. ' R __ 1 .6 - ~ '~'. J.- ___ _' ` F ~ - ~,.. - it _-•- { I.::::. .tea __ ..... s• ~i _ -- -i ~ ' .- ~~entnl~, I f =•-• :GA ... lam... Seh _, I ;: ::- _ ¢among~ odl. •~ der .. -.. . .il _ AM. P istgncal 4anQmsrw) • rk •• '~~•' • :A 11. _ ..n ate -~ I :.i .mot . i r; ~ ~~ Trader~~-. " _ .:.' C(' / - . ~ : ] ~ d~ r n i i { j : : i i • { ~ ark 2, II +1-~ ~_I iJl ~ 'I~ i •~i"• i.......'_• lei ~ I~ t - .. .. .. .. J.._ 11 •.~.~ - - ' - i U~t p .. _ //< - _ * ~ _ J11~/rte Sch ~ ~ ST I ~'• ~ 'n• '' ~ r 7 ~Ja'Sa_ •~ .._r _ '.. . _._ /~ = ..c ~...._ .y.. .. ST - - -_ -~-'\ - FEEDER • • , ~~I' ~~ R ®Reserroi \ • 1. \~ J--- _ _ __ _ ____ H I _ •_ l /oen ~ I, -- P ~- ~J ~ 2000 4000 SCALE feet INDEX NAP E~F~G, ~°1 N ~~~~~ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Tentative Tract SUBTT16651, Development Review DRC2003-00847, and Variance DRC2003-00848 Related Files. Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivision for condominium purposes on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 0207-101-23, 33, 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Development Review DRC2003-00847, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 92 condominwms consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel -APN 0207-101-30, 33, 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Tentative Tract SUBTT16651, Variance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING - (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A request to increase the maximum bwlding height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area, for a proposed 92 condominwms on 6 90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard- Cucamonga Channel Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel -APN 0207-101-32, 33, 50 Related Files Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Tentative Tract SUBTT16651, Development Review DRC2003-00847, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: K & S Property, LLC Kosrow Omidvar 26901 Highwood Circle Laguna Hills, California 92653 5 General Plan Designation Mixed Use 6 Zoning Mixed Use, Subarea 1, Foothill Boulevard Districts 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The 6 9 acre site is vacant and slopes southerly an average of approximately 4 to 5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of • the site where the slopes exceed 25 percent The site is triangular in shape with several scattered mature trees and a Eucalyptus windrow at the southwest end The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard The structures were deemed non-historic The site is bordered by the Pacific Electric Inland Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land followed by single-family development ~,F, GS\ Initial Study for SUBTT16651 /DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 and a trailer park to the south, the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Center to the east, and vacant land to the west Access into the site is from Foothill Boulevard Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Regional Water Quality Control Board -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) Discharge Permit City of Rancho Cucamonga -1) Grading and Bwlding Permits San Bernardino County Flood Control District GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Envronmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG - Reactroe Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS2002 -Urban Emissions Model • Et F, G, SZ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTTi 6651/DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less-Than-Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics () Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality () Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology/Soils () Hazards & Hazardous (/,) Hydrology/Water Quality () Land Use/Planning Materials () Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Population/Housing () Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Transportation/Traffic () Public Services () Recreation Utilities/Service S stems (/) Mandato Findin s of Si nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, • there wdl not be a significant effect m this case because revisions m the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I frnd that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation easures that are posed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is re cared _~ ` (p Q ~ Prepared By Date Reveiwed By - Date / E, F, ~ S`~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 4 Less Than SiBn,hcanf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp 9 i orenually Sipndmem With MrtlpaYOn Than S,gmhcenf No 1 act Into rafetl I act I act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenlc resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a-c) The site is located in a hillside area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, and would be developed in conformance with the landscape and streetscape guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard District and Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan (FBVIP) All structures on-site must meet Hillside Ordinance requirements and receive City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee approval prior to protect approval A Variance is being requested by the applicant regarding the height limitations on retaining walls and buildings located within the hillside area Within a hillside area, the permitted wall height is four feet, and building height is a maximum of 30 feet The condominiums are designed with two different product types The "uphill" product is comprised of three levels that include a ground floor with "tuck under" garage, a first floor, and a second floor, for a total building height of approximately 34 feet The height is not consistent across the building but rather a point on the building The maximum height of the building from the front is only 27 feet The "flat" product is designed with two levels with an option third floor loft With the loft, the building will have a total height of approximately 32 feet In the northeast corner of the uniquely shaped site, the existing topography raises up significantly This results in a retaining wall approximately 12 feet at its peak The wall height is a point location only and is not consistent Also, the wall is located at the rear of the site and would be screened from outside the protect by the proposed buildings Upon development review approval, the applicant would be required to provide screening for the proposed retaining wall to maintain the visual character envisioned for the Foothill Boulevard District of Rancho Cucamonga The wall will be screened from public view by the proposed apartment structures and landscaping d) The residential development would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures would be shown on Site Plans to be reviewed by the City Engineer for approval The style, shielding, and type of fixture shall be consistent with Development Code standards Impacts of IighUglare will not be significant, as other residential and commercial development surrounds the site, and contains similar lighting • t ~t ~ J ~J Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 5 Less Than Sipnd¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potanaally Sgni4cant With Mitigaaon Than Significant No I act Inco ratetl I act I act 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () () (/) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Wtlliamson Act contract c) Involve other changes rn the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a/c) The prolect site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located in an area zoned for mixed uses consisting of residential homes and commercial businesses along the Foothill Boulevard District There are approximately 1,300 acres of Pnme Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The site is within the southern section of the City, which is now characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial development The proposed development would be consistent with surrounding approved development The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Additionally, there are no Williamson Act contracts within the City 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () (/) () ( ) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality wolation~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () (/) () ( ) cntena pollutant for which the prolect regwn is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Et F, GI SS Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than Sipnihcent Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g P^le^aally SiBnibcant wuh Miapaoon Than Slpa,i~Canl No I act Into rete0 I C I en Comments: a-c) Development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga would contribute to pollutant levels within the area The South Coast Air Basin is currently in non-attainment status for Ozone (03) and Particulate Matter (PM,p) The addition of pollutants is an unavoidable significant impact for which the City adopted a statement of overriding considerations However, as standard conditions of approval, the City implements mitigation measures to control emissions using the best available control methods to reduce significant impacts from both the construction and operations phases of a protect All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 2. All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. The proposed residential development was evaluated using the Urban Emission Model 2002 (URBEMIS 2002) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,p) Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursors Construction Emissions Though not required, construction emissions were screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures The URBEMIS 2002 model separates emission estimates based on the phases of construction activity and the year in which the particular activity would occur The three typical construction phases for most protects are demolition, site grading, and building, URBEMIS 2002 calculates emissions assuming the three phases do not overlap It was assumed construction of the Tuscany Villas would commence in mid-2004 and be completed a year later in 2005 The proposed protect was screened under its proposed land use of medium residential The 6 90 acre site would be developed with 92 townhouses consisting of six and four unit buildings covering approximately 35 percent of the site Tables 1 A and 1 B Ilst emissions for years 2004 and 2005 ~1 LJ l ~1 `-'~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 Page 7 • Less Than Sipnilicanl Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Spnd¢ant wan Mmgauon Tnan Sigmhcant No I ect Inco rafetl I act I act Table 1 A URBEMIS 2002 Construction Emissions Summary For Year 2004 Site Grading and Building Activities (Pounds per Day) C Source ROG NO. CO PM,p Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met 2004 Grading Fu itnre Dust - - - - - 12 00 4 61 Off-Road Diesel 8 61 8 61 75 28 75 28 56 59 56 59 3 62 3 62 Worker Tri s 0 11 0 11 0 13 0 13 2 56 2 56 0 01 0 01 Totals 8 72 8 72 75 41 75 41 59 15 59 15 15 63 8 24 SCAOMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant No No No No No No No No 2004 Const. Off-Road Diesel 8 09 8 09 68 87 68 87 54 70 54 70 3 29 3 29 Worker Tri s 25 25 13 13 2 90 2 90 04 04 Totals 8 34 8 34 69 00 69 00 57 60 57 60 3 33 3 33 SCAOMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant No No No No No No No No Table 16 URBEMIS 2002 Construction Emissions Summary For Year 2005 Building Activities (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO. CO PM,p 2005 Construction Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Mlt Unmet Mft Off-Road Diesel 8 09 8 09 66 05 66 05 56 75 56 75 3 OS 3 05 Worker Trl s 0 22 0 22 0 13 0 13 2 66 2 66 0 04 0 04 Paint Off-Gas 59 18 59 18 - - - - - Paent Worker Tre s 0 22 0 22 0 13 0 13 2 66 2 66 0 04 0 04 As halt Off-Gas 0 60 0 60 - - - - - As halt E ul 4 14 4 14 27 36 27 36 34 52 34 52 1 11 1 11 As halt Worker tr 0 02 0 02 0 01 0 01 0 30 0 30 - - Totals 72 47 72 47 93 68 93 68 96 89 96 89 4 24 4 24 SCAOMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nefecant~ No No No No No No No No E, ~, G S~' Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 8 Lass Than Sipnd¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp 9 Potenaally Spnihcant Wrtn Miapaaon Tnan SiBnilicant No I an Into oreteo I act 1 ecl Changes were made to default settings within the URBEMIS model to reflect reasonable assumptions associated with the proposed prolect The architectural coatings time frame was changed from one month to three months to coincide with the conceptual phasing plan provided by the applicant On-site operation of certain equipment, such as concrete saws, was also modified to reflect a factual representation of the actual operational duration Tables 1A and 16 show prolect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented During grading activities for the site, fugitive dust (PM,p) would be generated Since, there are residential units within the vicinity of the site, and since the region is in non- attainmentfor PM,p, fugitive dust would be mitigated by the following measures 3. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air duality Management District [SCAQMD]and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PMip emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 4. Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMip emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 5. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,p emissions from the site during such episodes. 6. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that there use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the prolect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff 9. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low- pressure spray. 10 All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 11. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and mediate on-site when appropriate ar as soon as feasible. E,F,~ S~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847. DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 9 Less Than Sipmhcant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP g PMenlially Significant Wah M,tipauon Than Signihcant No I M IOCO ratatl Fact 1 atl • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 12. Construction contractors shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 13. Construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 During construction of the Tuscany Villas townhomes, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surtaces would increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area The nearest sensitive receptors are located south of the site across Foothill Boulevard The nearest school is 0 5 mile northeast of the site The preceding mitigation measures would ensure emissions are reduced to lowest possible levels using the best available control methods Impacts to sensitive receptors would be less-than-significant In addition, as shown in Table 2, emissions associated with post-construction activities (area and mobile emissions) would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Development of the site with 92 townhouse units would yield 539 average daily trips (ADT) Emissions associated with the proposed land use would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for criteria pollutants and would therefore be less-than-significant E, r-, G ~, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 Page 10 Less Than Sipmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenually Significant WtN INapaaon Than Stgnihcant No I act Inco rateE I ad I act Table 2 Post Construction Emissions (Area and Mobile Emissions) (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO, CO PM~p Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source 4 64 4 64 0 70 0 70 0 88 0 88 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 8 05 7 76 7 65 7 29 90 74 86 46 6 17 5 88 Totals 12 69 12 40 8 35 7 99 91 62 87 34 6 17 5 88 SCAOMD Thres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificant~ No No No No No No No No e) The proposed residential development would not generate emissions that would cause objectionable odors Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wddhfe Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water ACt (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlde species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sltes~ e) Conflict with any local polices or ordinances protecting O O (/) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance E, Ft G l~0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 Page 11 Less Than SiBntl¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially significant W,ih rnmpanon Than swntl¢am No I act Inco orated I aM I an f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the areas east and south of the site are developed Based on previous on-site development, surrounding residential/commercial development, and adjacent streets, It Is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would Inhabit the site b-c) No wetland or riparian habitats exist on-site Therefore, no Impact on these resources would occur d) The site previously contained two commercial buildings that were demolished The structures have been deemed non-historic The site Is located immediately north of Foothill Boulevard Past uses at the site and surrounding development have eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have traversed the area in the past e) There are a number of mature trees throughout the site, mostly along the east and west property boundaries The applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 for removal of trees on-site Ordinance Number 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate an woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single truck circumference of 15 Inches or more and multi-trucks having a circumference of 30 inches or more, without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City In August 2003, the applicant submitted the application for a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-00849) with appropriate fees An Arboricultural report was performed by California Arbor Care on September 23, 2003 The report stated that trees growing on-site have been there for 40 years or more and have lacked sufficient care and irrigation The 25 trees on-site are structurally poor, contain dead wood, and have signs of disease associated with the Eucalyptus Borer and Bark beetle The report suggested that the trees be removed and replaced due to the increased value of new, properly cared for plantings The following mitigation measures, as required in the Tree Ordinance, will ensure impacts from the removal of trees are less-than-significant 1) All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculate (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Any beetle infested wood shall be chipped, removed, and bused at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or traders is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5. 2) All other removed heritage trees shall be replaced with new trees as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Table 17 08.040-G. The size, location, and species of the trees shall be to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and City Planner ~ ~ -'t G (PI Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 12 Less Then Sgndmam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially SiBnAicent Wite Mn,gaLOn Than Sipnilmam No I act Inco oralatl I an I azl The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4, or Exhibit IV-3 Sensitive Biological Resources No ennfLcis with hahitat cnnServatinn titans would occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () (/) () ( ) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a-c) No cultural resources have been observed during previous construction on-site However, additional grading on the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources The following mitigation measures would ensure impacts to potential cultural resources would be less-than- significant Since a portion of the site previously contained two commercial buildings that were deemed non-historic, the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal 1. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2 A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. ~~ r1 LJ E,~,C~ t~2 Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Leu Than Signiecant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signtlicanf Wnn M,Opatwn Than Sipmhcant No aM pCO Olaletl atl hipad Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The vacant site is located immediately north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of the Pacific Electric Trail Development has occurred on-site in the past, indicated by the presence of concrete slabs on the south portion of the site No signs of past burial grounds were witnessed during a site visit If the presence of a ceremonial burial ground or the uncovering of a skeleton occurs the following mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant 3. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98. u • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () (/) ( ) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O (/) ( ) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O U (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () () () (/) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () (/) ( ) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater E,F,G ~3 Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less man 9gmLCam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fo9teneally Si mM1Cant Winn Mite anon G an Si mhtant No I an Inca oretetl I act I act Comments: a,c) The proposed development lies north of Foothill Boulevard, west and adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek concrete lined channel, south of the future Pacific Electric Inland Trail, and east of the existing commercial development Past development on the site included single-story buildings with associated paved areas, a photo from 1938 shows that the site was once used for agriculture Information concerning the geologic setting of the site was been obtained from two geotechnical studies pertonned for the site One study was performed by Academy Consulting Corporation on August 8, 2003 entitled, Preliminary Geotechn~cal Evaluation, with a subsequent revision conducted on September 30, 2003 A second Geotechnical report, Engineenng Geologic and Fault Investigation of the Properties Composing the Vineyard Townhouses site, Rancho Cucamonga, North of Foothill, West of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, was completed on March 14, 2003, by James R Evans, CEG 974 Information from both of the investigations are discussed within this section Southern California contains many types of seismically active and inactive faults, which could produce ground shaking or surface rupture Two regional faults that could affect the project area are the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults Two local faults that directly affect the City of Rancho Cucamonga are the Cucamonga fault and the Red Hill fault The site lies within a special studies zone for the Red Hill fault The following discussion describes each fault in more detail San Andreas fault -the San Andreas fault is aright-lateral, strike-slip fault approximately 746 miles in length The San Andreas extends from northern California into southern California and has produced some of the most extreme seismic events in the state The last major rupture on the southern end of the San Andreas fault was in 1857 in the Fort Tejon area leaving a surtace rupture 225 miles in length The San Andreas fault lies 13 miles north of the site and could produce a magnitude 8 0 earthquake San Jacinto fault -The San Jacinto fault is aright-lateral, strike-slip, minor right-reverse fault 130 mites in length The San Jacinto starts at the southeastern corner of the San Gabriel Mountains and separates the San Jacinto Mountains from the Perris block and belongs to a wide zone of on-going crustal deformation that makes up the active Pacific-North American plate boundary The San Jacinto fault lies approximately 13 miles northeast of the site and could produce a magnitude 7 5 earthquake Cucamonga fault -The Cucamonga fault, located 2 4 miles north of the site, is a thrust fault affecting the communities of Claremont, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga The Cucamonga fault marks the southern boundary of the San Gabriel Mountains, separating the San Gabriel's from the upper Santa Ana River valley The Cucamonga fault is a historic fault (displacement within the last 200 years), and could produce a 7 0 magnitude earthquake Typical ground rupture during a major event on the Cucamonga fault is 6 5 feet Red HIII fault -The Red Hill fault is a thrust fault approximately 16 miles in length, which could produce a magnitude 7 0 earthquake The proposed project is located within a special study zone for the Red Hill fault The eastern end of the Red HIII fault has shown more activity than the western end of the fault, and the eastern end is actually considered to be a part of the Cucamonga fault rather than the Red HIII fault because of the similarities in surtace rupture According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, several studies completed in the area of the Red Hill fault suggest the presence of a fault, but investigations were unable to determine whether or not the fault was active • • E,F,G ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 Page 15 • Less Then Sipnil,canf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially 9gmhcanl WiN Mniganon Than Sign,hcanf No I atl Inco rafetl 1 aM 1 act Geotechnical Investigations were conducted using trenches excavated Into Pre-Holocene age materials The trenches covered lengths between 200 and 300 feet and were located so as to overlap any trace of the potential tault using generally accepted fault orientations No traces of any fault were found on-site A contact between Pre-Holocene age alluvium and older Holocene age Alluvium was found, but it revealed neither offset nor shearing consistent with faulting Although ground rupture was eliminated as a threat, the seismic activity of the southern California region could expose development within the area to strong groundshaking The protect would need to be designed In accordance with requirements of the Undorm Building Code (UBC), and using recommendations presented In the geotechnical report, to ensure foundation strength and quality construction The Implementation of the UBC in construction has shown that protects experience no more than minor damage from even high ampiltude earthquake vibrations and Impacts can be reduced to less-than-significant Liquefaction occurs when soils become saturated with groundwater, usually within 50 feet of the surtace No groundwater was encountered during soil borings and historically groundwater Is 180 feet below the ground surtace Liquefaction would not Impact the site The Cucamonga Creek Channel has been concrete Ilned to control water that could produce mudflows, and appropriate setbacks have been provided along channel banks to avoid debris accumulation In the creek Landsildes or mudflows would not be an Impact at the site b) The proposed protect site has been developed In the past with buildings, paved areas, and landscaping Soils in the vicinity are described as slightly silty and clean gravelly sands, and partially cemented clayey sand and gravel with 40 to 50 percent cobbles and boulders The alluvium underlying the site is approximately 400-800 feet thick Although soils are cemented and weathered they lack sufficient amounts of clay to act as a binder When soils are disturbed during grading, excavation, or fell activities they become loosened and can be subtect to erosion To comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the contractor must form a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction management of storm water run- off, to avoid sedimentation off-site The applicant has submitted a WQMP that was prepared by Fuscoe Engineering Storm water quality management must be considered during a protects planning phase, implemented during construction, and ultimately maintained for the life of the protect Improperly managed run-off can be a significant source of water pollution causing impacts to aquatic habitat, wildlife, and water-dependent beneficial uses WQMPs are developed as required under State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) order number R8-2002-0012 and NPDES number CAS618036 Each storm water quality plan must incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system The protect proponent must be required to submit, for agency approval, a proposal identifying the BMPs, or pollution control measures, that would be incorporated into the protect to control discharges into the storm water system A WQMP has been formed for the proposed Tuscany Villas protect, which identifies BMPs for the post-construction management of storm water run-oft The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to City Officials for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) specifically ~1 rt ~ Y.1~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Signibtant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polent,ally sgnihtant With Mitiga0tn Than smn~ucam Nt I act Inco oratetl I ect I ad identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2. All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion d) Expansion testing of the soils on the site revealed very low expansion potential according to Uniform Building Code Table 18-1-B The density of the alluvium underlying the site, which is between 400 and 800 feet thick, would reduce the risk of subsidence Adherence to recommendations made by the soils engineer would ensure impacts remain at less-than-significant levels e) The protect would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident considerations involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically Intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ ~I J ~,F,G ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16661/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less TAen SipniACam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g Potentially Sipmficant WM Mnipetion Tnen Spnil¢am No I act Inco rated I act I act Comments. a\b\d) Proposed development would not require the use of hazardous materials A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), as discussed in Sections 6 and 8 of this Initial Study, was prepared by Fuscoe Engineering and submitted with structural, non-structural, and treatment control BMPs to address and reduce pollutants associated with residential development, including oil and grease, trash and debris, and pesticides, to the maximum extent practical Observations at a recent site visit indicated that the site is kept in a clean manner and is disked frequently to control weeds Small amounts of dumped fill dirt and construction debris (bricks) were observed on-site No discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils were seen on-site Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels would reduce the potential for significant hazards No impact is expected in relation to accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances c) The protect site is not located within 0 25 mile of a school site The nearest school is approximately 0 5 mile northwest of the protect site e-f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan or near a private airstrip No impact to air traffic or workers is expected g) The City Engineer reviews Site Plans to ensure protect related traffic does not interfere with the flow of other traffic along Foothill Boulevard or with evacuation plans and other emergency responses h) The protect site is located along the north side of Foothill Boulevard The site is currently vacant Areas to the east and south are developed with commercial/residential land uses The site is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () (/) ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site O O (/) ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site C,~, G ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Loss Tftan SiBnihcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially SiBndicant Wnn MitiBaoon Tnan Sipni6canl No 1 ad Into ratetl 1 ect I act e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () (/) ( ) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () (/) () mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () (/) ( ) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments. a/e/f) The protect applicant submitted a WOMP (Fuscoe Engineering, October 2003) for post-construction operations at the site The WOMP has identified BMPs or pollution control measures that would be implemented on-site to reduce the possibility of pollutants entering water systems and disrupting water quality Typical pollutants associated with a medium residential development include trash and debris, oil and grease, organic compounds and pesticides, nutrients, or sediment from landscaped areas Source control BMPs that would be included in the protect are previous areas associated with landscaping, efficient irrigation and drought tolerant plant species, and signage on storm drains indicating the ultimate deposition of waters is located within the creek channel A vortex separator would also be implemented on-site within storm drains to treat stone waters before leaving the site Vortex separators are designed and sized to treat an appropriately determined quantity of water to remove gross pollutants such as trash, debris, sediments, particulates, and hydrocarbons from storm water Impacts to the quality of surtace and groundwater would be less- than-significant 1. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) (Fuscoe Engineering, October 2003). BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. 2 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e, a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit b) The protect site does not lie within an area used for groundwater recharge Groundwater basins within Rancho Cucamonga are replenished by natural precipitation and through a number of spreading grounds and percolation sites Groundwater pumping is also limited by a 1958 Superior Court tudgment, which limits the extractable amount to less than the sustainable yield Water would be supplied by the Cucamonga County Water Department, which oversees any groundwater pumping or recharge activities within the region No impacts to groundwater supplies would occur L_J • EtF~ ~ • • L~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than SiOmncant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pP 9 Polenueny Sipnihrant wan Mipgauon Then Sgml¢ant No I an Inco rated I ed 1 act c-d) Development of the site would result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns Approximately five acres of the site slopes gently from north to south at an approximate 4 to 5 percent gradient, and approximately one acre of the site contains slopes greater than 8 percent Currently, storm water run-oft moves as sheet flow in a north to south direction across the site When construction is completed, an additional 32 percent of the site would contain hardscape areas, which would increase the amount of run-off A WOMP was prepared for the site in conformance with State Water Resources Control Board order number R8-2002-0012 The WOMP was developed to control these additional flows The design of the protect would convey concentrated flows along the interior streets of the residential community and discharge these flows into proposed catch basin inlets at various locations within the protect site Storm water would then be transported off-site through a new storm drain traveling west to east along the southern portion of the protect site, ultimately discharging into the concrete lined Cucamonga Channel The incorporation of the WOMP into the design of the protect would make impacts associated with siltation or flooding less-than-significant g-h) According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood maps, the site is located within the 100-year flood plain for Cucamonga Creek However, channel Improvements including concrete lining were designed to handle the 100-year flow, and confine storm water flows within the Cucamonga Creek Channel The flood hazard is considered less-than-significant i-t) The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City The protect site is located in the southwestern portion of the City, away from dam sites and no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs exist near the protect site Impacts from seiche, tsunami, or dam failure are not expected 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () (/) ( ) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments• a-b) On March 19, 2003, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2002-00001, Development District Amendment DRC2002-00001, and Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00001, to change the land use and zoning of the site from Office to Mixed Use to allow for Office and/or Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Under the Medium Residential component (100 percent of the site) up to 96 units may be permitted The applicant is proposing 92 condominiums on the site The site is physically isolated from surrounding land uses by natural or man-made features East of the site is the Cucamonga Creek flood control channel, and further east is the Albertson's shopping center To the south is Foothill Boulevard, a mator divided arterial street To the north and west is a large slope embankment, on top of which is the abandoned Southern Pacific railroad line (tracks removed) that is planned for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire E, F~ U Initial Study for SUBTTi6651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 20 Less Than Sgnihcant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Fatanoally siOnJicant WM MiaBaiion Than si0ntlitant No 1 an Inco oratatl I act I C Trail The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted design standards for development within the hillside area and Foothill Boulevard District The applicant has applied for a Variance to allow an increase in the maximum heights permitted for the retaining wall height and building height Upon approval, the prolect would not conflict with General Plan designations or zoning for the area, nor be incompatible with existing land uses No impact would be expected to land use or planning c) The site is not within a conservation area as delineated on Exhibit IV-3, Sensitive Biological Species, or Exhibit IV-4, Open Space and Conservation Plan, in the General Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Result m the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site ~s not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE Would the prolect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established m the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () (/) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase m ambient noise levels () (/) () ( ) in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessve noise levels • • C~ ~f~) ~1 lV Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Sipmficant Less Issues and Su orten Information Sources pp g Potentially SiBn~ncam wnn Mnipauon Than SlBrofiwnf No I act Into rate0 I act I act Comments a/c) An Acoustical Analysis entitled, Acoustical Analysts, Vineyard Terraces Apartments, Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga was performed on September 23, 2002, by Gordon Bracken and Associates The report included a discussion of the expected exterior community noise environment and the recommendations for control of noise en the exterior and interior living areas of 200 senior apartments A revised Acoustical Analyses was prepared to reflect a change en the prolect from 200 sensor apartments to 92 townhouses The updated report, Addendum to Acoustical Report 02/566, Vineyard Townhomes-City of Rancho Cucamonga, completed on September 23, 2003, evaluated the prolect based on an exterior noose level of 65 dBA, and entereor noose level of 45 dBA, a unet-to-unit Sound Transmesseon Class (STC) of 50, and an Impact Insulateon Class (IIC) of 50 Evaluateon of noose levels ecluded current and future roadway nooses affecteng the sate 100 feet from the center of Foothell Boulevard The exesting roadway noose was measured at 68 dBA, 75 feet from the center of Foothell Boulevard Future noose levels were calculated to be 74 dBA, 100 feet from the center of Foothell Boulevard useng the Federal Heghway Admenestrateon's Heghway Noose Predectaon Model (FHWA RD-77-108) Metegateon measures presented below would reduce exterior and entereor noose levels to less-than-segnefecant levels Exterior 1. Sound barriers at least 6.5 feet high must be erected around all ferst floor private patios faceng Foothill Boulevard from the two southernmost buildings. 2. Sound barriers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected around the Mine-Park at the west end of the prolect site. 3 Sound walls at least 5.5 feet hegh must be erected around all other private patios wath any veew of Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerlene. 4. Each completed noise control barreer must present a solid face from top-to-bottom. Cutouts and openings are not permitted except for dram holes. Intereor 1. STC 30 glazing shall be added to all units weth a veew to Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline. 2. STC 28 glazing shall be added to all units with any veew of Foothell Boulevard but greater than 225 feet from the roadway centerlene 3 To maantaan ambient endoor noose levels at 45 dBA or less, adequate fresh aer ventalataon shall be proveded through the anstallataon of aer condetionang or a "summer swatch" and outside ducting. 4 Common floor to cealeng assemblies between units shall be constructed useng one of the followeng methods 8 ench concrete slab, 1.5 inch LWC, sub-floor, R-11 ansulataon, resileent channel, drywall cealeng, 1.375 ench Gyp-Crete, sub-floor, 2 inch by 10 ench toasts, R-11 ansulataon, resalaent channel, .5 ench drywall cealeng, E1F~ ~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTTi6651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than SiBnibcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information S r P°'e""°"Y w"" Than ou ces PP 9 Spm"cent MNgaaon Significant No I ct Inco rated I atl Irtpact Some recommended assemblies cannot meet the Impact Insulation Class 50 minimum requirement without carpet. Uncarpeted areas above other living units will require some form of proprietary isolation product under the floor to achieve the required rating such as Enkasonic, Acousti-Mat, Monsanto SC50, or others. Common wall assemblies between units shall be constructed of one of the following methods: • Two layers .5 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, fiberglass insulation, two layers .5 inch direct nailed drywall; • Two layers .625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, R-11 insulation, two layers .625 inch drywall; • .625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 4 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, 1 inch airspace at plate, with 2 inch by 4 inch plate with 2 inch by 4 four inch studs, .625 direct nailed drywall; • Same as last, with two layers of R-11 insulation; • Two layers .625 drywall direct nailed, 2 inch by 4 four inch studs, 1 inch airspace, 2 inch by four inch studs, R-11 insulation, two layers .625 drywall; • Same as last, with two layers of R-11 insulation 6. All plumbing and electrical installations shall be installed for compliance with the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 35. b) Groundborne vibrations or noise levels would be associated with protect grading activities Grading activities would be short-term and any vibrations created would occur during daytime hours and not impact residences during sensitive periods of time such as evening hours or sleeping hours Impacts from vibrations would be less-than-significant d) Traffic along Foothill Boulevard is the predominant source contributing to the ambient noise levels in the area Development of the site under the proposed Medium Residential District would be compatible with surrounding development Standard measures contained in the City's Development Code would ensure construction noise would be at less-than-significant levels The following mitigation measures would ensure impacts remain at less-than-significant levels 7. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 8. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 9. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. e-f) The protect is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan or near a private airstrip No noise impacts would be associated with airport operations n IL_J ~~ ~~1 Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Ttten Sipmhcam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s9 ^,.a..Y mLCant ;"" Mni anon ;lien S ni4cant No I act Inco reteC I ect I act 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (tor example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) Development of Tuscany Villas would result in construction of 92 new dwelling units consisting of 62 three-bedroom townhouses and 30 two-bedroom townhouses Maximum occupancy of the development would result in 308 additional residents The increase in residents would equal less than one percent growth in residents for the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to population figures obtained from planning staff in January 2003 The site has previously undergone development in the past Existing sewer and electrical service adtacent to the site would serve the proposed protect No extension of mator infrastructure would be required No impact associated with substantial growth would occur b-c) No residential structures currently exist on-site Therefore, no impacts to housing would occur 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental /acilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental factlities, the construction of which could cause sigmbcant environmental Impacts, In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obtectives for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protectioM b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard immediately west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and is served by a fire station located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue west of Archibald Avenue Standard Conditions of Approval of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes would be enforced upon protect approval Police Protection -Development of the site would incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council E~F`Ca ~3 Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 24 Less Than 9gmhcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant Waft Miogaoon Tien Signibcam No I aM Inco ratetl 1 ad I act Schools -The proposed protect would generate additional students into the local school districts Based on a total of 92 townhouses, a total of 43 students would be generated within the Central School District (046 students per dwelling unit), and 19 high school aged students would be generated within the Chaffey Joint Unified High School District (0 20 students per dwelling unit) Total elementary/middle and high school aged children generated by the protect would be an additional 62 students The applicant would be required to pay appropriate School Impact Fees Public Facilities/Services -Development of the site would incrementally increase traffic on adtacent streets in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Council 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The addition of 308 residents to the area would require an additional 1 54 acres of parkland for the city to maintain its standard of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents Within the development, several open space amenities are provided including tot lots and barbeque/picnic areas, but the additional residents would incrementally increase the use of existing parks within the Foothill Boulevard Districts The applicant would be required to pay Development Impact Fees as an alternative funding source for adding park acreage or making park improvements No impacts to existing recreation facilities is anticipated b) The protect site is located south of the future Pacific Electric Trail, aClass Imulti-use bicycle and pedestrian trail located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way, which varies in width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga Evaluation of Site Plans would ensure development at the site would not impact the use or entoyment of the Pacific Electric Trail or any park in City of Rancho Cucamonga 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in O O (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial Increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections) b) Exceed, ether individually or cumulatively, a level of O O l) (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways ~~ ~tF,G ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 Page 25 Less Then Sipmhcenl Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP 9 Potentially SipnA¢ant Wah Miopaaon Than Significant No I act Into retetl I act I act d) Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or Incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result In inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted pohcees, plans, or programs O O O (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a-b) In October 2002, a Traffic Analysis entitled, Rancho Cucamonga Mixed Use Traffic Report, was prepared for the site, and considered the development of 200 senior apartments and 8,000 square feet of retail space Conclusions reached In the previous study determined that a full Traffic Impact Analyses was not required because vehicle trips were below the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) threshold level of 250 peak hour trips Additionally, et was determined that protect traffic would be below the level of segnificance used for analysis A revised traffec analysis was prepared by Austin-Foust on September 23, 2003, to analyze the change in land use intensity from 200 senior apartments to 92 townhouses at the site The conclusions presented in the revised traffec analysis showed a drop in Average Daily Traffic (ADT) • by 261 vehicles, from 800 ADT to 539 ADT Peak hour volumes also varied dureng a m and p m hours When development changed from senior apartments to townhouses, a m trips Increased by two vehicles (from 39 to 41) and p m trips decreased by six vehicles (from 56 to 50) The findings presented in the revised traffic analysis stated that while the change en residential units from 200 senior apartments to 92 townhouses does result in a substantial reduction in overall daily trips, the change In the critical peak hour trips Is nominal and the previously reported levels of service remain unchanged Condetions of approval required by the City's Engineering Division would adequately address the street emprovements necessary to accommodate protect traffic In addition, the applicant would be responsible for paying the City's Traffic Impact Fees and improving the frontage of the protect along Foothill Boulevard The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the fair share of the protect of roadway Improvements as Identified by the Clty Engineer c) The protect site is located approximately three moles north of Ontareo Airport, and Is northerly of the flight path and would not impact users of aircraft d-e) Proposed plans Include a separate emergency access located near the southeastern corner of the site Approval of the Slte Plans by the Flre Department, Police Department, and City Public Works Department would alleviate Impacts assoceated with hazards and emergency access f) Accordeng to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, the proposed residential development would require a total of 201 parking spaces The protect includes 30 two-bedroom townhouses, which require 1 8off-street parking spaces, and 62 three bedroom townhouses, which require two off-street parking spaces, In addition to one off-street parking space which must be proveded for every four units for visitor parking The applicant has designed the protect to include 209 parking • spaces, an exceedance of 8 spaces, two of which are that of guest parking No impacts to parking would occur L t~1 Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 less Than Sipntlitant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially 9gnilmant Wah MitiBeoon Than Sgmhcant No I act Inco reletl I t1 I etl spaces, an exceedance of 8 spaces, two of which are that of guest parking No impacts to parking would occur g) The protect site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard immediately west of Cucamonga Channel According to Exhibit III-7 of the City General Plan, a Class II Bike Lane occurs on Foothill Boulevard Class II Bike Lanes are located next to the curb or edge of paved roadways and are a minimum of five feet in width The cyclist shares the road shoulder with vehicles in a Class II Bike route, which includes signage, special lane lines, and other pavement markings In addition, a Class I Bike Path is planned north of the site within the existing Pacific Electnc Railroad right-of-way, and along the Cucamonga Creek Channel Class I Bike Paths are fully separated from vehicles Bus service is also provided near the site (approximately one block east on the south side of Foothill Boulevard) Development of the site would be in accordance with the Development Code and would not create a hazard to bicyclists or pedestrians, nor conflict with policies supporting alternative transportation 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of ewshng facihUes, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, in which waste is treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga, and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The r~ U C~ ~,~, G ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less TM1an Sivmfcant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially 9gmhcant WitM1 Miopauvn TM1en Signibcant No I act Inco rataE I acl I act protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water duality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All run-off would be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows Proposed drainage must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits In addition, the developer has formulated a WQMP designed to avoid significant impacts to water quality from run-off originating on-site The plan incorporates Best Management Practices including resident education, signage, and drain inserts to accomplish goals established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system The Tuscany Villas as proposed would use 73,600 gallons of water per day at peak usage According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, in the year 2000, residential water use was estimated at 23 9 million gallons per day The peak usage for the proposed residential development represents less than one percent increase in water usage for the City Additionally, Cucamonga County Water District has indicated it has the ability to serve the protect No impact is expected on the availability of public water supplies e) The proposed protect is served the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The wastewater treatment provider has also indicated their ability to serve the protect No impact to wastewater treatment is expected f) The current City contracted hauler would provide solid waste disposal needs Waste would be disposed of at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle solid waste requirements No impact is expected on solid waste disposal g) The protect would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, which requires a 50 percent reduction in the amount waste deposited in landfills by the year 2000 No impacts are anticipated to compliance with federal, state, or local statues 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () (/) ( ) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 28 Lass Tnan S,BnNCent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po9lennally Si nihcanl W~,ih Min anon ~Tnan Si niLCanl No I eM Inco oreted 1 act I act c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () (/) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Currently, the site is vacant except for remnants of past development including foundations and parking areas Areas north, south, and east of the site are developed Based on surrounding residential/commercial development and adtacent streets, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site Development of the site will require the removal of the trees Ordinance Number 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate an woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single truck circumference of 15 inches or more and multi-trucks having a circumference of 30 inches or more, without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City In August 2003, the applicant submitted the application for a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-00849) with appropriate fees An Arboricultural report was performed by California Arbor Care on September 23, 2003 The report stated that trees growing on-site have been there for 40 years or more and have lacked sufficient care and irrigation The 25 trees on-site are structurally poor, contain dead wood, and have signs of disease associated with the Eucalyptus Borer and Bark beetles The report suggested that the trees be removed and replaced due to the increased value of new, properly cared for plantings The mitigation measure contained in the initial study will ensure impacts from the removal of the trees are less-than-significant b) Proposed development of 92 condominiums would add additional residents to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and cause short-term impacts to air quality and noise Other residential development occurs south, southeast, and north of the protect All service providers have confirmed their ability to serve the proposed development New residents would not exceed buildout population estimates The applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with design standards established in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code The General Plan was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, aesthetics, and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Proposed development at the site would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities are completed '•' 1 F1 u\ i Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Lass man Significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenaalty Sipnihcant Wnfi MiLpaaon man 9pnd¢ant No I act Inco ratetl I act I ad EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed an the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) (/) Gordon Bracken and Associates, Acoustical Analysis, Vineyard Terraces Apartments, City of Rancho Cucamonga, September 23, 2002 (/) Gordon Bracken and Associates, Addendum to Acoustical Report 02/0566, Vineyard Townhomes, City of Rancho Cucamonga, September 30, 2003 (/) James R Evans, CEG 974, Engineering Geologic and Fault Investigation of the Properties comprising the Vineyard Townhouses site, Rancho Cucamonga, North of Foothill, West or the Cucamonga Creek Channel, March 14, 2003 (/) Academy Consulting Corporation, Preliminary Geothchnical Evaluation for the Site Located on Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, Assessor's Parcel Number 207-101-32, 33 and 50, Riverside County California, August 8, 2002 (/) Academy Consulting Corporation, Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Update for the Site Located on Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, Assessor's Parcel Number 207-101-32, 33 and 50, Riverside County, Calafornaa, Addendum to Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Protect Number 0207-1764-F, Dated August 8, 2002, September 30, 2003 (/) Fuscoe Engineering, Inc, Water QualAy Management Plan, Tuscany Villas at Redhall, October 30, 2003 (/) Fuscoe Engineenng, Inc, Local Hydrology/Hydraulic Report, Tuscany Villas at Redhill, October 2003 (/) Austin-Foust Associates, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga Mixed Use Traffic Report, October 8, 2002 (/) Austin-Foust Associates, Inc Rancho Cucamonga Mixed Use Traffic Report Update, September 26, 2003 (/) Calafornaa Arbor Care, Arboriculture Report, Foothill Boulevard/Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, September 22, 2003 ~~` ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847, DRC2003-00848 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 30 Less Than Signibwnt Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g '°le"sally Significant W"" Mnigao°n Than Sipmi¢am N° I ect Inc° ratetl 1 act I act APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clea/rl~y%n~'~;ignificant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~ ~~4%'tGG~,~~~~ Date f~(v~ ¢- Pnnt Name and T~tie ~S(~~~ L ~C.L! S D/f//S/9~/ /~/I~.`~ r72. • C~ ~, rrt ~ `~30 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated /or public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21097 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651, Development Review DRC2003-00847, and Variance DRC2003-00848 Public Review Penod Closes: February 11, 2004 Project Name: Tuscany Villas at Redhill Prolect Applicant: Fuscoe Engineering Prolect Location (also see attached map) Located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN 0207-101-23, 30, 32, 33, and 50 Project Description. A residential subdivision of 6 90 acres and design review for the development of 92 condominwms consisting of 4 and 6 unit clusters, and a Variance request to increase the maximum bwlding height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area FINDING . This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing thts Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review penod. February 11 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO 04-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16651, A SINGLE LOT SUBDIVISION OF 6 90 ACRES OF LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-CUCAMONGA CHANNEL MIXED-USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-32, 33, AND 50 A Recitals 1 Fuscoe Engmeenng filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Tentatve Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 8, 2004, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting to present the project and solicit commurnty feedback Seven residents attended the meeting 3 On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 4 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detennmed, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on February 11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to 6 90 acres of vacant property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel, south and east of the abandoned Paafic Electric Railway comdor, and b The site is triangular in shape and slopes southerly at an average of approximatey 4 to 5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of the site where the slopes exceed 25 percent, and c The site is bordered by the planned Paafic Electric Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land, followed bysingle-family development and a trader park to the south, the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Centerto the east, and vacant land to the west, and d The site has several scattered mature trees and a remnant Eucalyptus windrow at the southwest end, and r') Ft ~ ~ n PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 2 e The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard, and The protect consists of a single lot subdivision for residential condominium purposes, and g The subdivision is to accommodate 92 condominiums units that range in size from 1,406 to 1,923 square feet, and h A Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-00849) has been submitted because development of the site wall require removal and replacement of 25 trees on-site, and i A Vanance application (DRC2003-00848) has been submitted in contunction with the tract for relief from the 30-foot maximum building height and 4-foot retaining wall height, and The site will gain access from Foothill Boulevard 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application E, Fi ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • February 11, 2004 Page 3 b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there rs no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application sublect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00849 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site The • applicanUdeveloper shall be required to remove and replace trees sublect to Environmental Mitigation Numbers 1 and 2 under Biological Resources listed below The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading permits 2) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements shall be in accordance vnth ' s the Foothill Boulevard Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan typical suburban parkway design adopted by City Council Resolution No 02-037 3) All retaining walls shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, sublect to review and approval by the City Planner 4) The applicant shall get permission from adjacent property owners for any off-site grading or improvements 5) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to incorporate the vacant offsde parcel (APN 0207-101-13) that runs along Foothill Boulevard into the protect and landscape design If this cannot be achieved, the entry wall on the west side of the dnve aisle shall be relocated on-site, to the satisfaction of the City Planner Engineenng Division • 1) According to the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 8630, a portion of the southwest comer of the property may be located in Flood Zone 'A' The easterly end of this area fronts Foothill Boulevard near the location that provides main PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 • Page 4 access to the site It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone'A' designation removed from the project area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faalities suffiaent to obtain an un-shaded Zone 'X' designation for the protect area The developer's engineer shall prepare all of the necessary reports, plans, and hydrologiGhydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the FEMA pnor to approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A LOMR shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first If the FEMA is unvnlling to revise the FIRM, elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the Flood Zone a) Plot Zone'A' limits on the Grading Plan Determine and show the necessary mitigation measures (flood walls, etc) Your area of responsibility shall include any and all property that may be obtained (for entry access purposes) to the west southwest of the onginal protect boundary b) Ordinance No 669 contains the City's floodplain management regulations Flood Zone 'A' is a "Specal Flood Hazard Area" (SERA) and is defined on page 10 of the ordinance c) The ordinance includes standards for construction (page 16) of structures within areas of Special Flood Hazard 2) Provide a Portland Concrete Cement (PCC) drainage swale adtacent to the fill side of the retaining wall(s) along the northwest property line (see TRC Grading Plan Section D-1, submittal date stamped December 15, 2003) Collect the concentrated flows from the swales and convey through on-site pnvate storm dram system Provide calculations forthe sizing of this swale and drainage system pnor to the issuance of grading penmts 3) The protect proposes to dram to and/or could be impacted by Cucamonga Creek, a Flood Control Distnct faalrty, therefore, wntten comments will be requested by the developer from San Bernardino County Flood Control Distnct (SBCFCD), and those comments shall be provided to the City pnor to Public Improvement Plan approval In the event that SBCFCD does not allow direct connection with the channel a) Construct City Master Plan Stonn Dram Line No III-1 to Foothill Boulevard from existing location, south of Foothill Boulevard, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent Master Plan faa6ties, in accordance with City policy b) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to • the master plan storm drains The cost of local storm drams shall be borne by this development with no fee credit The developer ~, F, C~ ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 5 may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development wthin the same tnbutary area If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terrninate c) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle - Q100 4) On-site pnvate storm drain system shall be designed for 11100 5) Prowde a nght tum lane at the main project entry in accordance with City Standard No 119, street type (AC per Section B-B) a) Additional nght-of-way will be required to facilitate the westbound Foothill Boulevard nght tum lane into the site (reference Standard Conddions) b) Right tum lane shall be 200 feet long plus 60.foot transition c) Curvilinear sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard shall change to curb adtacent and 6 feet wide along the nght tum lane 6) Foothill Boulevard public frontage improvement through to Cucamonga Creek Channel to the east shall be installed in accordance vnth City "Mator Divided Artenal" standards and the Foothill Boulevard Distnd gwdelines outlined in the Development Code, including but not limded to a) Curbs and gutters, street pavement, drainage facilities, streetlights, street trees, curvilinear sidewalk, street type dnve approach, cross-gutter, pedestnan ramps, signing, stnping, etc b) Divided Mator Artenal, minimum 120-foot wide total nght-of-way includes 13-foot wide parkway Centerline of street and centerline improvements may not be the same Dedicate additional street frontage nght-of-way as required dunng plan check 7) Proposed main dnveway shall align with Highndge Place of Tract No 15540 a) Modify the traffic signal at Highndge Place to fit the new intersection configuration and provide a Traffic Signing and stnping Plan along Foothill Boulevard to the satisfaction of the • City Engineer (Reference City Drawing No 1805) b) All gated entrances shall conform to the City's Design Gwde Dnve approach shall be a maximum of 50 feet wide, inGuding two E t F, ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 . Page 6 20-foot wide ingress and egress lanes separated by a 10-foot Nude island c) In this location, v~nth the traffic signal, use a "street type" entry rather than a commercial dnve approach With street type, provide access ramps at the curb returns and a cross gutter Curb return radu shall be 35 feet d) Signal loops shall be located outside the gated entry area Provide an easement for maintenance of signal egwpment e) Lme-of-Sight designs shall be provided for the main project entrance, on the Grading and Landscape Plans 8) Reimburse developer of Tract 15540 (refer to street reimbursement agreement) for half the cost of traffic signal installation at Highndge Place 9) A contnbution in lieu of construction fee for the future median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the Gty pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first The amount of the contnbut~on shall be one half the cost of the median • (currently estimated at $60 00 per linear foot), times the length of the protect frontage 10) Grading Plan (TRC plan submittal date stamped December 15, 2003) indicates that the top of curb/flowline grades along Foothill Boulevard do not meet the City's minimum rate of slope Dunng plan check the flowline profile for Foothill Boulevard will need to meet the minimum standard of 0 4 percent 11) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan. Install WQMP system and show on the Grading Plan Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) 12) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or . demolition protect E . ~, ~ ~`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 7 Environmental Mitigation Arr Quality 1) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 2) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping 3) The site shall be treated vwth water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 4) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 5) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 6) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 7) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficetion 8) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD, as well as City Planning Staff 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 10) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 C r Q q LIi`I C5l pO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0424 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 8 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and mediate on-site when appropnate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if sdt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 12) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 13) The construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipmentwhen not in use Bro/og~ca/ Resources 1) All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance Any beetle infested wood shall be chipped, removed, and buned at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with sod, to prevent emerging Borer Beetles from reinfesting othertrees orwood The movement of Eucalyptus wood contairnng live Borer Beetles or their larvae in trucks or traders is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 2) All other removed hentage trees shall be replaced with new trees as • required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Table 17 OS O40-/G1 The size, location, and `1 F, n PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0424 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 9 speaes of the trees shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga v~nll Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification vnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspecaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological • hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follownng appropnate CEQA gwdehnes Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources vnihin the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report vnth onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actvities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 10 Submit summary report to Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum 3) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 dictates that if any human remains an: unearthed dunng construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to ongm and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 Geology And Soils 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submil to Gty Officals for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shell be used on-site to reduce pollutants entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical i 2) All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept moist orre-planted Huth drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion Hydrology and Water Quality S 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) (Fuscoe Engmeenng, October 2003) BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for rewew and approval by the City Engineer 2) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply Hnth obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submiried to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Sound bamers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected around all first floor pnvate patios facing Foothill Boulevard from the two southernmost buildings 2) Sound bamers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected around the Mini-Park at the west end of the protect site 3) Sound walls at least 5 5 feet high must be erected around all other • pnvate patios with any view of Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0424 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • February 11, 2004 Page 11 4) Each completed noise control bamer must present a solid face from top-to-bottom Cutouts and openings are not permitted exceptfordrain holes 5) STC 30 glazing shall be added to all units with a view to Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline 6) STC 26 glazmg shall be added to all units with any view of Foothill Boulevard but greater than 225 feet from the roadway centerline 7) To maintain ambient indoor noise levels at 45 dBA or less, adequate fresh air ventilation shall be provided through the installation of air conditioning or a "summer snntch" and outside ducting 8) Common floor to ceiling assemblies between units shall be constructed using one of the following methods • 8 inch concrete slab, • 1 5 inch LWC, sub-floor, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, drywall ceiling, • • 1 375-inch Gyp-Crete, sub-floor, 2 inch by 10 inch foists, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, 5 inch drywall ceding, Some recommended assemblies can not meet the Impact Insulation Class 50 mirnmum regwrement without carpet Uncarpeted areas above other liwng units will require some form of propnetary isolation product under the floor to achieve the required rating such as Enkasonic, Acousti-Mat, Monsanto SC50, or others 9) Common wall assemblies between units shall be constructed of one of the following methods • Two layers 5 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, fiberglass insulation, two layers 5 inch direct Waded drywall, Two layers 625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 inch drywall, 625 inch direct Waded drywall, 2 inch by 4 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, 1 inch airspace at plate, with 2 inch • by 4 inch plate with 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 625 direct Waded drywall, Same as last, with two layers of R-11 insulation, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 12 • Two layers 625 drywall direct Waded, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 1 inch airspace, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 drywall, Same as last, ninth two layers of R-11 insulation 10) All plumbing and eledncal installations shall be installed for compliance with the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 35 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as speafied m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning . Drwsion If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 13) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible rn first phase 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby • certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit E,F,c3c ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-24 SUBTT16651 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 13 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~~~~ _\~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847, AND VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EtF~~ `~S MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM • TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 December 29, 2003 page 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requved for the speafic phase of development All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that requre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibtlity of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwiding permits MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) _m Project File No.: SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 Initial Study Prepared by: _Warren Morelion. Assistant Planner Applicant: Fuscoe Engineering Date: December 29. 2003 -. .. Air Quality All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping The site shall be treated with water or other CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CE C Review of Plans A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions ~ from the sde during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venUcaLOn 1 l~ .. . . . . . ... . -. .. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAOMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and mediate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and waterin Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en meenn ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Review of Plans A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughtares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction "n n Y~ 2of8 ... -. .. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractors shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use Biological Resources All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall CP D Review of Plans A/C 2/3 be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance Any beetle infested wood shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or Carped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is ~ prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 i All other removed heritage trees shall be replaced with CP D Revew of Plans A/C 2/3 new trees trees as regwred by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Table 17 OS 040-G The size, location, and species of the trees shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CP B/D Review of Plans A/C 2/3 encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value lT ~o J 3 0~ • rn .n N 8 .. ... -. • • -• .. .. • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Revew of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique Report prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C documenting the inventory, evaluation and Review of A/D 3/4 , proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect Report area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiwn A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP g field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall Review of A/D 4 submit a report of findings that wail also provide specific Report recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP g Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared 80 B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and Hold the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum 4 of 8 rn 7 i • .. .. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 CP C Review of A/D 4 dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during Report construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 Geology and Soils Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to City Officials for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion Hydrology and Water Duality The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMD) (Fuscoe Engineering, October 2003) BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage underthe National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Sound barriers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around all first floor private patios facing Foothill Boulevard from the two southernmost buildings 5 0~ . . .. . . ... . . - -. .. Sound barriers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around the Mini-Park at the west end of the protect site Sound walls at least 5 5 feet high must be erected CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around all other private patios with any view of Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline Each completed noise control barrier must present a CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 solid face from top-to-bottom Cutouts and openings are not permitted except for drain holes STC 30 glazing shall be added to all units with a view to BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline STC 28 glazing shall be added to all units with any view BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 of Foothill Boulevard but greater than 225 feet from the roadway centerline To maintain ambient indoor noise levels at 45 dBA or BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 less, adequate fresh air ventilation shall be provided through the installation of air conditioning or a "summer switch" and outside ducting Common floor to ceiling assemblies between units shall BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be constructed using one of the following methods 8 inch concrete slab, 1 5 inch LW C, sub-floor, R-11 insulation, resilient • channel, drywall ceiling, 1 375 inch Gyp-Crete, sub-floor, 2 inch by 10 inch foists, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, 5 mch drywall ceding, • Some recommended assemblies cannot meet the Impact Insulation Class 50 minimum requirement without carpet Uncarpeted areas above other living units will require some farm of proprietary isolation product under the floor to achieve the regwred rating such as Enkasonic, Acousti-Mat, Monsanto SC50, or others rn n~ Y. N 6 of 8 • .. .. • -. . .. .• Common wall assemblies between units shall be BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C y4 constructed of one of the following methods • Two layers 5 inch direct Waded drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, fiberglass insulation, two layers 5 inch direct Waded drywall, • Two layers 625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 inch drywall, • 625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 4 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, 1 inch airspace at plate, with 2 inch by 4 inch plate with 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 625 direct nailed drywall, • Same as last, with two layers of R-11 insulation, Two layers 625 drywall direct nailed, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 1 inch airspace, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 drywall, • Same as last, with two la ers of R-11 insulation All plumbing and electrical installations shall be installed BO B/C/D Review of Pians A/C y4 for compliance with the California Code of Regulations ~ Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 35 n Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A ' hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction 4 ~ ~ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday i Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP/BO C During q q J / standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Dvision within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 7 tJ~ Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordason of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bulding Permit BO -Building Official or designee C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion C -Plan Check D S 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating - eparate Submidal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order FC - Fve Chief or designee 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation m 0 s 8 of 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16651 -TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL SINGLE-LOT SUBDIVISION FOR 92 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 6 90 ACRES SUBJECT: OF LAND APPLICANT: FUSCOE ENGINEERING LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements Completion Dete 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract Map No SUBTT16651 is granted subject to the approval of Variance _/_/_ DRC2003-00848 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expue, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and marntained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations all Conditions commenced thereon ect site or business activit bein of the ro t P / / , y g j p rior o any use 2 _ _ _ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner S~-,o-03 1 F,F,G 10~ Protect No SUBTT16667 Completion Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable Cary Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Namrng Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are sublect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits S Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter D. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit E. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ SC-10-03 2 ~ j ~t U 1"~ Protect Na SUBTT76657 Completion Date a Site/Plot Plan, • b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of ail plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848) . The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and ail other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Satety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval H. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manutacturer's "high wind" instructions 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 -/-/- -/~- -//- -/-/ / / -/-/- -//- -//- -/-/ -//- -/-/- -//- -/-/- SC-10-03 3 ~ t ~t G \O~ Protect No SUBTT16651 5 Provide draft stops in attics to line with common walls 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 8 If the area of habitable space above the fvst floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bulding shall be not less than 1-hour ftre-resistroe construction Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Caltfornia Bulding Code, Ctty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualtfied engineer or geologist and submttted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing butldings where tmprovements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The gradtng plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer J. Additional Requirements/Comments Protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Bulding Code Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) SEE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs L. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Ctty Council, except that in developments containing more than one bulding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of tmprovements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Completion Date _/_/_ -~-~~ -~-~- / / -~-~- /__J_ / / / / / / / / _/-~. ~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 4 ~ \ ~\ ~ 1" `~ Protect No SUBTT16651 Completion Date Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other FOOTHILL BLVD X X (c) (e) X X (b) (d) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) Ii so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item Medlan Island (e) Street type entry per Standard No 119, Section B-B, with cross-gutter Improvement Plans and constructlon a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic slgnal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Englneer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Englneer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, trafflc signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer • d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-Inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Ciry Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satlsfactlon of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sldewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In • accordance with the City's street tree program / / / / / / / / / / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / -~-~- SC-10-03 5 ~ ~ `~ ~ \~~ Protect No SU8TT16661 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those areas shall be perthe public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spaeing Size' dry Foothill Boulevard Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 tt 20 tt 15 gal " OC Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft 15 gal OC 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED "QUANTITIES DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAN CHECK Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Cary standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard N. Drainage and Flood Control The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer -/-~- -/-/- • / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- _/_/~ SC-10-03 6 ~1~1`-'\'10 Protect No SUBTT16651 Completion Date 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adlacentareas 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects P. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- -~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~- SC-10-03 7 E\F1C~ 1\\ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 8 DATE: 8/13/02 T0: HENRY MURAKOSHI, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK, CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER PROJECT: (PR) DRC2002-00579, DRC2003-00847, SUBTT16651 LOCATION: N/S FOOTHILL, W/0 VINEYARD DESIGN NOTES: 1 STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-OF-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK) ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909-477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION 2 STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BYTHE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME 3 STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4 INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE 5 INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BYTHE PLANNING DIVISION ON-SIT AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED 6 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW- IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT AIJY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE- STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET 7 (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) NON ACTIVITY CENTERS I Rhus lances I African Sumac I 5' 120' O C -PRIMARILY IN R 0 W INFORMAL GROUPINGS NOT MORE THAN 25% OF TOTAL FRONTAGE TREES NON ACTIVITY I Platanus acerlfolla I London Plane Tree I 8' I SPACE PER ON SITE CENTERS-ON SITE PLANS - 30' 0 C SUGGESTED 15 GAL I FILL IN E, F, G 1~2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS December 10, 2003 Tuscany Villas N/S Foothill Blvd & W/O Vineyard Ave Fuscoe Engineering DRC2003-00847 & SUBTT76651 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Note to the applicant: 1. Building permits will not be issued until the public and private water plans are approved. 2. A Fire flow letter is required prior to Building permit rssuance. The new 16"Water main on Foothill Blvd. must be installed prior to the test. 3. Reciprocal agreements including access easements from adjacent property owners must be recorded before permit issuance. CJ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS. FSC-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de- sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any bwlding 2 Mm~mum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers. The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect is 3000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring in accordance to NFPA 13R and 72 This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow• Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the requued fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size ~t~~ G \\~ FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance• When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fue hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution regwrements Contact the Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground. Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval FSC-3 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined• Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access. All portions of the structure or taality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specfications for private fire district access roadways are a The mirnmum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radws shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds grass vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles FSC-4 Single-family Residential Sales Models 1 Minimum Access and Water: Residential sales model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system 2 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or I property 3 Operate a place of public assembly G t~ ~1 U i r~ L • FSC-5 Plan Submittal Regwred Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Bwlding, Fve, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-6 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement. The plans as subm~ted indicate that a required point of Fire Distract access a Regwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adfacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subfect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all property subfect to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subfect to the agreement d Site Plan• The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radii, load-bearing capacity of roadway surface, etc shall be provided 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement. The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and built- in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement E, Ft ~, ~~s PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fue District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation• All prvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Satety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water Distract On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect 4 Public Installation• All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water Distract to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation o/ Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the requred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Frnal Inspection Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 Sprinkler Momtonng The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies 6 Frre Suppression System: Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 7 Fire Alarm System Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit 8 Access ControUTraffic Calming Device Permit A Fve District permit is required to install any access control deuce, traffic-calming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic-calming dewces (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Diwsion 9 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information • E,F,G~\~ 10 Construction Access• Fve District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards 11 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and prows~ons that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 13 Address- Other Than Single-family New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 14 Fire Suppression Systems-Final Inspection and Testing• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by FCS 15 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 16 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use £, F, G ~\~ • RESOLUTION NO 04-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-00847, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 92 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS CONSISTING OF 4 AND 6 UNIT CLUSTERS ON 6 90 ACRES OF LAND IN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-CUCAMONGA CHANNEL MIXED-USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-32, 33, AND 50 A Recitals 1 Fuscoe Engmeenng filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-00847, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 8, 2004, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting to present the protect and soliGt community feedback Seven residents attended the meeting 3 On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date . 4 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on February 11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to 6 90 acres of vacant property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel, south and east of the abandoned Pacific Electnc Railway comdor, and b The site is triangular m shape and slopes southerly an average of approwmately4-5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of the site where the slopes exceed 25 percent, and c The site is bordered by the planned Paafic Electnc Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land followed single-family development and a trader • park to the south, the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Center to the east, and vacant land to the west, and d The site has several scattered mature trees and a remnant Eucalyptus windrow at the southwest end, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0425 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 2 e The site has been cleared under a previous demolition pertnit of two vacant structures that were located near Foothill Boulevard, and f The protect consists of the development of 92 attached condominiums, which includes two 4plex unds, fourteen 6-plex units, and a recreation center ~nnth a pool and spa, and g The condominiums will be compnsed of an "uphill"and "flat" building product, each with two separate floor plans The "uphill" product will include 1,650 and 1,923 square foot units, with 228 and 349 square foot courtyards, respectively The "flat" building product will include 1,406 and 1,857 square foot unts, vwth 244 and 225 or 295 square foot courtyards, respectively, and h A Tree Removal Penrnt (DRC2003-00849) and arbonst report have been submitted for removal and replacement of 25 trees on-site, and i A Vanance application (DRC2003-00848) has been submitted in contunction with the tract for relief from the 30-foot mawmum bwldmg height and 4-foot retaining wall height, and The protect wall gain access from Foothill Boulevard 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together wdh the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative . Declaration with regard to the application PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING . February 11, 2004 Page 3 b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the prolect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the prolect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prolect, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Diwsion 1) All Conditions of Approval from Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651 and . Vanance DRC2003-00848, which pertain to this Development Review, shall apply 2) Tree Removal Permit ORC2003-00849 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site The applicanUdeveloper shall be regwred to remove and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Numbers 1 and 2 under Biological Resoun;es listed below The Tree Removal Pennit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading permits 3) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements shall be m accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Histonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan's typical suburban parkway design adopted by City Council Resolution No 02-037 4) All retaining walls shall be made of a decorative wall matenal, subject to review and approval by the City Planner 5) The applicant shall get permission from adjacent property owners for any off-site grading or improvements 6) Prowde direct access via a lockable gate from the site to the Cucamonga Channel Regional Trail 7) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to incorporate the vacant . offsite parcel (APN 0207-101-13) that runs along Foothill Boulevard into the prolect and landscape design If this cannot be achieved, the entry wall on the west side of the dnve aisle shall be relocated on-site, to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~1 ~ ~ C.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 • Page 4 8) Provide a minimum of 4 additional feet between the parallel parking spaces that exist south of the pool house Enpineennp Division 1) According to the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 8630, a portion of the southwest comer of the property may be located m Flood Zone 'A' The easterly end of this area fronts Foothill Boulevard near the location that provides main access to the site It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone'A' designation removed from the project area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection fatalities sufficient to obtain an un-shaded Zone 'X' designation for the protect area The developer's engineer shall prepare all of the necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the FEMA pnor to approval of the final map or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first A LOMR shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first If the FEMA is unwilling to revise the FIRM, elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the Flood Zone a) Plot Zone'A' limits on the Grading Plan Determine and show the . necessary mitigation measures (flood walls, etc) Your area of responsibility shall include any and all property that may be obtained (for entry access purposes) to the wesUsouthwest of the onginal project boundary b) Ordinance No 669 contains the City's floodplain management regulations Flood Zone 'A' is a "Spetaal Flood Hazard Area" (SERA) and is defined on page 10 of the ordinance c) The ordinance includes standards for construction (page 16) of structures within areas of Spetaal Flood Hazard 2) Provide a Portland Concrete Cement (PCC) drainage Swale adtata:nt to the fill side of the retaining wall(s) along the northwest property line (see TRC Grading Plan Section D-1, submittal date stamped December 15, 2003) Collect the concentrated flows from the swales and convey through on-site pnvate storm dram system Provide calculations forthe sizing of this Swale and drainage system pnor to the issuance of grading perrmts 3) The protect proposes to drain to and/or could be impacted by Cucamonga Creek, a Flood Control Distnct facility, therefore, wntten comments will be requested by the developer from San Bernardino County Flood Control Distnct (SBCFCD), and those comments shall be • provided to the City pnor to Public Improvement Plan approval In the event that SBCFCD does not allow direct connection v~nth the channel ~, F, G \2\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0425 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 5 a) Construct City Master Plan Storm Drain Line No III-1 to Foothill Boulevard from existing location, south of Foothill Boulevard, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent Master Plan facddies, in accordance vnth City policy b) Install local storm drams to convey all development drainage to the master plan storm drains The cost of local storm drams shall be borne by this development with no fee credit The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees, from future developmentwilhinthe same tnbutary area If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the Gty, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate c) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle Q 100 4) On-site pnvate storm drain system shall be designed for Q100 5) Provide a nght turn lane at the main protect entry in accordance wdh City Standard No 119, street type (AC per Section B-B) a) Additional nght-of-way will be regwred to faGlitate the westbound Foothill Boulevard nght turn lane into the site (reference Standard Conditions) b) Right turn lane shall be 200 feet long plus 60-foot transition c) Curvilinear sidewalk on Foothill Boulevard shall change to curb adtacent and 6 feet wide along the nght turn lane 6) Foothill Boulevard public frontage improvement through to Cucamonga Creek Channel to the east shall be installed in accordance with City "Mator Divided Arlenal" standards and the Foothill Boulevard Distnct guidelines outlined in the Development Code, inGuding but not limited to a) Curbs and gutters, street pavement, drainage faalities, streetlights, street trees, curvilinear sidewalk, street type dnve approach, cross-gutter, pedestnan ramps, signing, stnping, etc b) Divided Mator Artenal, minimum 120-foot wide total nght-of-way includes 13-foot wide parkway Centerline of street and centerline improvements may not be the same Dedicate additional street frontage nght-of-way as required dunng plan check PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 6 7) Proposed mam dnveway shall align with Highndge Place of Tract No 15540 a) Modify the traffic signal at Highndge Place to fit the new intersection configuration and provde a Traffic Signing and Stnpmg Plan along Foothill Boulevard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (Reference City Drawnng No 1805) b) All gated entrances shall conform to the City's Design Guide Dnve approach shall be a ma~umum of 50 feet wide, mGuding two 20-foot wade ingress and egress lanes separated by a 10-foot wide island c) In this location, with the traffic signal, use a "street type" entry rather than a commercial dnve approach With street type, provide access ramps at the curb returns and a cross gutter Curb return radu shall be 35 feet d) Signal loops shall be located outside the gated entry area Provide an easement for maintenance of signal egwpment e) Line-of-Sight designs shall be provided for the mam project entrance, on the Grading and Landscape Plans 8) Reimburse developer of Tract 15540 (refer to street reimbursement agreement) for half the cost of traffic signal installation at Highndge Place 9) A contnbution in lieu of construction fee for the future median island m Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City pnor to the issuance of building pemnts or final map approval, whichever occurs first The amount of the contnbution shall be one half the cost of the median (currently estimated at $60 00 per linear foot), times the length of the protect frontage 10) Grading Plan (TRC plan submittal date stamped December 15, 2003) indicates that the top of curb/flowline grades along Foothill Boulevard do not meet the City's minimum rate of slope Dunng plan check the flowline profile for Foothill Boulevard will need to meet the minimum standard of 0 4 percent 11) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identdy applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan Install WQMP system and show on the Grading Plan Maintenance of BMPs identified m the WQMP shall be addressed in the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) 12) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related admimstratrve fees shall be paid for the Construction and r~I IL J E,F, G \2'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 7 Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable fat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Forn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first building perrnt application is submitted to Bwiding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Environmental Mdicabon Air Quality 1) All residential and commercial structures shall be requred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 2) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg 3) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 4) Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 5) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 6) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactwe construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 7) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 8) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and • protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for E.F,G. ~~-`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 8 the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD, as well as City Planning Staff 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 10) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 11) All construction equipment shall comply vnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and mediate on-site when appropnate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 12) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemahve fuel powered equipment where feasible 13) The construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not m use Biological Resources 1) All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced • v~nth 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance Any beetle infested wood shall be chipped, removed, and buned at a dump site or EtF,G ~'L~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • February 11, 2004 Page 9 tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging Borer Beetles from reinfesting other trees orwood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live Borer Beetles or their larvae in trucks or traders is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 2) All other removed hentage trees shall be replaced with new trees as requved by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Table 17 08 040-G The size, location, and species of the trees shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actwities to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga anll Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from • demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speGal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wdl also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation • measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures 1 F~ ~ ~ LAY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0425 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 10 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actrvities Should fossils be found mnthin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the montor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specmens moth a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum 3) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 dictates that if any human remains are unearthed dunng construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to ongin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 Geology and Soy/s 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to • City Officals for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entenng the storm dram system to the mawmum extent practical 2) All disturbed and bare or exposed sods shall be kept moist orre-planted ninth drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion Hydrology and Water Quality 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMD) (Fuscoe Engineenng, October 2003) BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer 2) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Pemtit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit E, F, c~,1`L~C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 11 Norse 1) Sound bamers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected around all first floor pnvate patios facing Foothill Boulevard from the two southernmost buildings 2) Sound bamers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected around the Mini-Park at the west end of the project site 3) Sound walls at least 5 5 feet high must be erected around all other pnvate patios with any view of Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline 4) Each completed noise control bamer must present a solid face from top-to-bottom Cutouts and openings are not permitted exceptfordrain holes 5) STC 30 glazing shall be added to all units with a view to Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline 6) STC 28 glazing shall be added to all units with any view of Foothill Boulevard but greater than 225 feet from the roadway centerline 7) To maintain ambient indoor noise levels at 45 dBA or less, adequate fresh air ventilation shall be provided through the installation of air conditioning or a "summer switch" and outside ducting 8) Common floor to ceiling assemblies between units shall be constructed using one of the following methods • 8 inch concrete slab, 1 5 inch LWC, sub-floor, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, drywall ceding, • 1 375 inch Gyp-Crete, sub-floor, 2 inch by 10 inch loisis, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, 5 inch drywall ceiling, • Some recommended assemblies cannot meet the Impact Insulation Class 50 minimum requirement without carpet Uncarpeted areas above other living units will regwre some form of propnetary isolation product under the floor to achieve the required rating such as Enkasonic, Acousti-Mat, Monsanto SC50, or others 9) Common wall assemblies between units shall be constructed of one of the following methods ~^ t ~~ ~l \ ITV PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 12 Two layers 5 inch direct Waded drywall, 2 mch by 6 inch plate, 2 mch by 4 inch staggered studs, fiberglass insulation, two layers 5 mch direct Waded drywall, Two layers 625 inch direct Waded drywall, 2 mch by 6 mch plate, 2 mch by 4 mch staggered studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 mch drywall, • 625 mch direct Waded drywall, 2 mch by 4 mch plate, 2 inch by 4 mch studs, R-11 insulation, 1 mch airspace at plate, with 2 mch by 4 mch plate with 2 mch by 4 mch studs, 625 direct nailed drywall, • Same as last, wrath two layers of R-11 insulation, • Two layers 625 drywall direct Waded, 2 mch by 4 mch studs, 1 mch airspace, 2 mch by inch studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 drywall, • Same as last, wrath two layers of R-11 insulation 10) All plumbing and electrical installations shall be installed forcompliance with the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 35 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Diwsion within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Drvision If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 13) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ , F, C~ \'L`1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-25 DRC2003-00847 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • February 11, 2004 Page 13 BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-vwt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • EIF~ G \'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847, AND VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelmes As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wtll be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially sigrnficant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • r1 LJ t r ~ ~ \~~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 December 29, 2003 page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to montor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form Unantiapated arcumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) iT rT y Project File No.: SUBTT16651/DRC2003-00847/DRC2003-00848 Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner Applicant: Fuscoe Engineering Date: December 29, 2003 • .. ... , -• .. Air duality All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C p/q required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping The site shall be treated with water or other CE C Revew of Plans A/C 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Foothill Boulevard shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CE C Review of Plans A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venhcation • 1 rn ~a V ~~ r~ ' - . .: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAOMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and mediate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible Reestablish ground cover on the construction site • CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and waterin • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineerin radices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Review of Plans A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2 of 8 rn T .. • • - • . .. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible The construction contractors shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use Biological Resources - All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall CP D Rewew of Pians A/C 2/3 be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance Any beetle infested wood shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or Carped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae m trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 All other removed heritage trees shall be replaced with CP D Review of Plans A/C 2/3 new trees trees as requred by Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Table 17 OS 040-G The size, location, and species of the trees shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CP B/D Review of Plans A/C Z3 encountered before or during grading, the developerwdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wili • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish ds archaeolo icai value 3 0~ rn tY~ .6 r1 L J n LJ .. ... , • -• ~. Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique Report prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, Cp documenting the inventory, evaluation and C Review of A/D 3/4 , proposed mitigation of resources within the protect Report area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archrvin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction Cp g field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Review of A/D 4 submit a report of findings that will also provide specific Report recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the tollowin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared g0 e/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum 4 of 8 rn (~ y • .. . - ... •- California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 Cp -• C Review of A/D .. dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during 4 construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the Report County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 Geology and Soils , h~; ~< < ~s,~; ~, r. - - Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to City Officials for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept CP B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion Hydrology and Water Quality ~x The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water puality Management Plan (WOMD) (Fuscoe Engineering, October 2003) BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Prior to issuance of grading or pawng permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Sound barriers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around all first floor private patios faang Foothill Boulevard from the two southernmost bwldings . 5 0~ rn N `] l J • ~ ... -. . .. Sound barriers at least 6 5 feet high must be erected CP/BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around the Mini-Park at the west end of the protect site Sound walls at least 5 5 feet high must be erected CPBO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 around all other pnvate patios with any view of Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline Each completed noise control barrier must present a CPBO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 solid face from top-to-bottom Cutouts and openings are not permitted except for drain holes STC 30 glazing shall be added to all units with a view to BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Foothill Boulevard and less than 225 feet from the roadway centerline STC 28 glazing shall be added to all units with any wew BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 of Foothill Boulevard but greater than 225 feet from the roadway centerline To maintain ambient indoor noise levels at 45 dBA or BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 less, adequate fresh air ventilation shall be provided through the installation of air conditioning or a "summer switch" and outside ducting Common floor to ceiling assemblies between units shall BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be constructed using one of the following methods • 8 inch concrete slab, 1 5 inch LWC, sub-floor, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, drywall ceiling, 1 375 inch Gyp-Crete, sub-floor, 2 inch by 10 inch foists, R-11 insulation, resilient channel, 5 inch drywall ceiling, • Some recommended assemblies cannot meet the Impact Insulation Class 50 minimum regwrement without carpet Uncarpeted areas above other living units will require some form of proprietary isolation product under the floor to achieve the required rating such as Enkasonic, AcoustrMat, Monsanto SC50, or others 6 of 8 • .. ... -. ' ~• .. Common wall assemblies between units shall be BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C p/4 constructed of one of the following methods • Two layers 5 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 6 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, fiberglass insulation, two layers 5 inch direct nailed dnrval I, Two layers 625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 rnch by 6 mch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch staggered studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 inch drywall, 625 inch direct nailed drywall, 2 inch by 4 inch plate, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, 1 inch airspace at plate, with 2 inch by 4 inch plate with 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 625 direct nailed drywall, Same as last, with two layers of R-11 insulation, • Two layers 625 drywall direct nailed, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, 1 inch airspace, 2 inch by 4 inch studs, R-11 insulation, two layers 625 drywall, Same as last, with two la ers of R-11 insulation All plumbing and electrical installations shall be installed BO B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 for compliance with the California Code of Regulations ;+; Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 35 ~ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A q ~ hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a ~ national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP/BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Irne Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Cade Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Dvision within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted n 7 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Methotl o1 Verification ~ "Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - W rthhold Certdmate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deport or Bonds FC - Fue Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citatwn m 0 8 of 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00847 -TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL SUBJECT: 92 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 6 90 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: FUSCOE ENGINEERING LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, offtcers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Development Review DRC2003-00847 is granted subfect to the approval Variance DRC2003-00848 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-25, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development • 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations satao3 t E t Ft G ~~~ Comolehon Date -/-/- -/_/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2003-00847 Comoleoon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwidings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/~_ all receptacles shielded from public view 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete . or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 11 Ail building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the Cary Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter n walls/fences and sidewalk tw t tb k b f 5 / /~ 15 se ac e ee oo - On corner side yards, provide minimum _ _ SC-10-03 2 ~ t F1 ~ \ `~ Protect No DRC2003-00847 Completion Date • D. 16 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided 17 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as regwred by the Development Code 18 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products Building Design Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Bwlding Official review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans • E. F. \J Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a budding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated vsdor parking areas 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. _/-/- ~-/- _/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/_/. -/-/- -/-/. _/-/- SC-10-03 3 ~ 1 1" ~ ~ \~ ,J Project No DRC2003-00847 Completion Date G. Landscaping • 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within _/_/_ the protect 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24-inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/~_ stalls 4 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required byth~s section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~~_ slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas ~ within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Foothill Boulevard 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_!_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and vrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Sig ns 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre ~ separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs SC-, 0-03 4 ~ , ~, ~ \ \~ Protect No DRC2003-00847 Comoletion Date Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto issuance of bulding permits Environmental A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes • The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements u Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing sa4sfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved envvonmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans -/-/- -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / SC-10-03 5 ~ 1 ~1 ~ ` `~ Project No DRC2003-00847 Completion Date L. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT16651 / DRC2003-00847 / DRC2003-00848) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other appl~cabie codes, ordinances, and regulations rn effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval M. New Structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A It the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction / /_ -- / / / / / / ~_/_ ~-/- / / -/-/~ / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / _/_/~ SC-10-03 6 ~ 1 F1 ~ \~`c Prgect No DRC2003-00847 Comolehon Date • N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be ~n substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sobs report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwl Engineer O. Additional Requirements/Comments Protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Budding Code, Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) SEE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Q. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those bindings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • SC-10-03 -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/~- -~-~- -~-~- / / -~-~- Project No DRC2003-00847 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other FOOTHILL BLVD X X (c) (e) X X (b) (d) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Median Island (e) Street type entry per Standard No 119, Section B-B, with cross-gutter Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program SC-10-03 Comoletion Date _/_/ -/~_ / / / / / /_ -- / / / / -~-~- / / -~-~- • Protect No DRC2003-00847 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed • legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Ciry Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size• qty Foothill Blvd Rhus iancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft 15 gal OC Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 tt 30 tt 15 gal OC 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED "QUANTITIES DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAN CHECK Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ciry standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Ciry Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required R. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard S. Drainage and Flood Control The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first . 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the Cdy Engineer Completion Date ~_/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/ -/-/- SC-10-03 9 ~ 1 F1 `~'t \~ Protect No DRC2003-00847 Completion Date 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/~_ property from adtacent areas • 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its _/_/ right-of-way T. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~_/ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_/ Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with ~_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ W. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ 4 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed X. Security Fencing . 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime SC-10-03 10 ~ 1 ~t - ` \SO Protect No DRC2003-00847 Prevention Unit along with plans if this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Y. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking dewces and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner Z. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibthty At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division All developments shall submit an 8'/z" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: `_ SC-10-03 SEE ATTACHED Completion Date -~-~- -~-~. / / _~-~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 8/27/01 DATE: 8/13/02 TO: HENRY MURAKOSHI, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK, CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER PROJECT: (PR) DRC2002-00579, DRC2003-00847, SUBTT16651 LOCATION: N/S FOOTHILL, W/0 VINEYARD DESIGN NOTES• 1 STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-OF-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK) ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909-477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION 2 STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME 3 STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4 INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE 5 INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ON-SIT AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED 6 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET _? (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) 8 NON ACT1VflY CENTERS I Rhus lances I Afrlran Sumac I 5' 120' 0 C - PRIMARILY IN R 0 W INFORMAL GROUPINGS NOT MORE THAN 25°6 OF TOTAL FRONTAGE TREES NON ACTIVITY I Patanus acerdolla I London Plane Tree I 8' I SPACE PER ON-SITE CENTERS-ON SITE PLANS - 3d 0 C SUGGESTED 15 GAL I FILL IN • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS December 10, 2003 Tuscany Villas N/S Foothill Blvd & W/O Vineyard Ave. Fuscoe Engineering DRC2003-00847 & SUBTT16651 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Note to the applicant: i. Building permits will not be issued until the public and private water plans are approved. 2. A Fire flow letter is required prior to Building permit issuance. The new 16"Water main on Foothill Blvd. must be installed prior to the test. 3. Reciprocal agreements including access easements from adjacent property owners must be recorded before permit issuance. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS. FSC-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Pnvate Water Supply 1 General Gwdance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of Tire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants inmulti-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de- sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Spnnklers. The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 3000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring in accordance to NFPA 13R and 72 This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Show Existing Fve Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requved fue flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Number of Fue Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fue flow or fraction thereof, subiect to standard spacing and distribution requvements Contact the Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fue sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fue sprinkler system underground to the Fue Safety Division for approval FSC-3 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fue District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fue lanes 2 Location of Access. All portions of the structure or faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the fast story shall be located within 150-feet of Fue District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire distract access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside turn radws shall be 20-feet c The outside turn radws shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fue apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings 5 Vegetation Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fue vehicles FSC-4 Single-family Residential Sales Models 1 Minimum Access and Water Residential sales model homes requve approved Fue District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system 2 General Use Permit shall be requved for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fue Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 3 Operate a place of public assembly ~ ~ \~`, C • • • FSC-5 Plan Submittal Required Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check tees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-6 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division wtll review requests for attemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plans as submtted indicate that a requred point of Fire District access a Requires passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Trtle Report A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Srte Plan. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surface, etc shall be provided 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and built- in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement 1 ~~~ \~~ PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Prrvate/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fve District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fve Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-toot radius of the protect 4 Publrc Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation o/ Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner + 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Droision 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fve Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies 6 Fire Suppression System. Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment or other speaal hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fue Construction Services permit 7 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit 8 Access ControUTraffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permd is required to install any access control device, traffic-calming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic-calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fue lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Division 9 Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information r, ~ J ~fr~ ~ 1 JW • 10 Construction Access Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained tree and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fue District Standards 11 Phased Construction• Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire Distract access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fve lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 13 Address- Other Than Single-family New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated dunng periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 14 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by FCS 15 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 16 Fire Drstnct Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use ~. ~ F, C~, ~S`~ . RESOLUTION NO 04-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT AND RETAINING WALL HEIGHT PERMITTED IN THE HILLSIDE AREA, FOR A PROPOSED 92 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 6 90 ACRES OF LAND IN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-CUCAMONGA CHANNEL MIXED-USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-32, 33, AND 50 A Recitals 1 Fuscoe Engineering filed an application forthe issuance of Variance DRC2003-00848 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vanance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public heanng on February 11, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to 6 90 acres of vacant property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel, and b The site is triangular in shape and slopes southerly at an average of approximately 4 to 5 percent, with the exception of an area at the northeast portion of the site, where the slopes exceed 25 percent, and c The site is bordered by the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land, followed by single-family development and a trailer park to the south, the Cucamonga Channel followed by Vineyard Town Center to the east, and vacant land to the west, and • d The applicant is requesting Vanance DRC2003-00848 in contunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651 and Development Review DRC2003-00847, to allow and increase the maximum budding height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the hillside area, where the Development Code allows a maximum height of 30 feet and 4 feet, respectively ~,F, G \5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-26 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 2 e Stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship in that it would substantially limit the size of the site and number of units allowed (both because of site area and building height) to be constructed that would not normally occurwith multi-family development in anon-hillside area The site is nestled up against a steep slope embankment of the former Pacific Electnc Railway, which measures approximately 15 to 20 feet in height, hence, the 18-inch increase in budding height will be greatly diminished by the slope and related landscaping The nearest existing residences to the north are considerably higher uphill, and more than 300 feet away from the protect site, therefore, will not be affected by the increased height The retaining walls proposed by the grading design are necessary to create a buildable area within the confines of this very narrow tnangular parcel f There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct, in that the protect is amulti-family development in an isolated hillside area The site is surrounded by the Pacific Electnc Inland Empire Trail and vacant land to the north, Foothill Boulevard and vacant land to the south, and the Cucamonga Channel to the east Because of the site location, the area and design of the protect is limited compared to other multi-family development in vacant areas outside of a hillside area • g Stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct, in that it would substantially limit the size of the site and number of units allowed to be constructed that would not normally occur with multi-family development in anon-hillside area h Granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct, in that other properties with similar site constraints and/or restnctions would warrant the granting of a Vanance i Granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public heakh, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, in that the buildings and walls will be constructed per building code and with decorative matenals to match existing development in the area 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent vv~th the obtectives of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the properly that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specfiied regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct • d That the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a grant of special pnvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct ~-~,G\~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-26 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING • February 11, 2004 Page 3 e That the granting of the Variance wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the wGnity 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is cetegoncaily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAd (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Gwdelmes 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Diwsion 1) All conditions of approval from Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16651 and Development Review DRC2003-00847 that pertain to this Variance shall apply 2) All walls shall be made of a decorative wall material, subtect to rewew and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer • 3) The applicant shall get permission from adtacent property owners for any off-site grading 4) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematwe, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the Gty, ds agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chairman ~~.I ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary Ct ~t ~ \~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-26 VARIANCE DRC2003-00848 - FUSCOE ENGINEERING February 11, 2004 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the follovnng vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r1 ~, F, ~ \~\ PLAN 4 TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL RANCI{O CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: K & S PROPERTY LLC CONTACT: Mr. Kosrow Omidvar 26901 Highwood Circle Laguna Hills, CA 92653 CASE #: SUBTT16651, DRC2003-00847; DRC2003-00848 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 REAR ELEVATION 6-PLEX UPHILL PRODUCT ELEVATIONS OF PRODUCTS FACING FOOTHILL BLVD. SCALE• 3/16" =1'-0" L1 / , PLAN 2 PLAN 4 ~Z~-- O.WE~IIANASSOGAiES ANCNIIECNNE & PUNNING wwr, u arms lw~e)sr.-mw ru (we)ir. it :eo~~a~a~oom e.wq~eea~,.ua~~m ~~ 0]00600 WAdrAO~1 J6MN/~RY IY ]OW A-7 I I ~ I ~ c°"R,Y..rs° PLAN 3 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 3 ~,u FRONT ELEVATION 6-PLEX FLAT PRODUCT W/ LOFT ~~ ~ ~ i i i T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE February 11, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER -The design review of elevations fora 12-plex Multi-Cinema, 2 story 61,283 square foot movie theater (AMC) In the Mixed-Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located in the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center at the southeast corner of . Cultural Center Drive and Kew Avenue - APN 0227-201-35 This action Is within the scope of the protect reviewed In an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 20010301028) prepared for Development Agreement 01-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Said EIR was certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002, and no additional environmental review for the discretionary actions mentioned In this notice is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 BACKGROUND The protect Is located within Phase 1 of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center The design review was approved by the Planning Commission In November of 2002 AMC Theater Is subtect to its own Independent design review, similar to the other large anchor tenants, such as Robinsons May, Macy's, and JC Penny PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonmg• The site Is surrounded by vacant land with various shops and restaurants and active open space elements of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center under construction, which is a Mixed-Use District in the Victoria Community Plan B General Plan Designations The site and surrounding area are designated Mixed-Use per the General Plan C Site Characteristics As mentioned, this portion of the site is under construction Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street are under construction to the west and north, respectively Access to the site will be provided by the internal circulation system of the Regional Center accessed by the aforementioned streets, as well as the planned Victoria Gardens Loop to the south and east ITEM "H" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER February 11, 2004 Page 2 D Parking Calculations The site is surrounding by large parking fields to be developed with Victoria Gardens The overall center is parked at a ratio of 4 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet This parking ratio was arrived at as a result of a special parking study done for the Regional Center ANALYSIS A General The AMC Theater bwlding will be located towards the northeast corner of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, east of the Cultural Arts Center It, along with the Police Substation, a storage bwlding, a restaurant, and a shop building, wdl occupy the block contained within Cultural Center Dnve to the north, North Mainstreet to the south, Kew Avenue to the west, and Eden Avenue to the east Because of its location, the AMC Theater will be casually prominent from the I-15 Freeway The bwlding walls are treated with color and reveal patterns, articulation, and stone file wainscoting, including a long pergola that runs the entire length of the east elevation The pergola provides visual relief and interest and softens the appearance of the east side of the building The pergola extends beyond the northeast corner of the bwlding that visually leads patrons entering from the north and northeast sections of the parking lot to the entrance to the theater off North Mainstreet The south and west sides of the theater bwlding will be partially obscured from view by smaller tenant buildings B Design Review Committee The Committee will reviewed the protect on February 3, 2004 The Committee's recommended approval subtect to the conditions found in the Resolution of Approval C Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee wdl reviewed the protect on February 3, 2004 The Committee's recommended approval subtect to the conditions reflected in the Resolution of Approval RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of DRC2003-01246 through adoption of the attached Resoiution of Approval submitted, Planner BB BLC\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Sight Line Study Exhibit "E" - Elevations • Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated February 3, 2004 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2003-01246 Na MOI1JOa1VMOJ aOJ lOM Aa INIM II]aY xINO NOlavua OlNl lJn \JIUJ N11e 4Y• . ~ eae _ - ~ ~: $ o ~E~:~a~_ = o e ~ ~~~~~~~~e~.~e ~s ~ ~~ _ ~rogi .^- anaaaaaaa 9 x ~ p Q ~~=~~aV ]ooi ac-m:a~e ~a°¢:e eR:?~~ ~~doge X ~~~+ ~ I I I I I I I I _ I 1 I I Cos ra o a) 3N~ ,. .. -- ----------- .J--- = - (a31xv madola Jo wm lox a 333x15 oreld) \-'' SN3ad~J b'IdOl~IA ' ,, ~ --- ` H 311 I W( I ~ I II ' ~~ I ppp~ I 1 sl I I ' ( I I VI ~ I 4( I I ~I 1 ~ py a I I I I ' 1 I \~ I / I ___ _ / I -}-~ - }_-- ~ ' I --- _ _-_-_ _ / ~ i ~ Y l i~ ~Y $g / 3~b'1d SN3Oatl'J NOIIIAVd I I ~ ~ _ _ ~ .{ i/ ~ ___ J ~ J ~/ / ---_ - / ~ U 1- J ' ~ ~ c~ ~, a '3- I ' N / W f _~ Q o ~ ~~~ I ,~ ~3 ~ ~ 9; ~ ~ ~ (53iavn m o a~ (NilN3J ~xbdO16 fO (tl'/d i 13 15 JfRM) --~~ - - 3Nd~~~09bV -- ------- r------ , 1 1 n F I 6 ' I °~ __ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~~ J ~ r-ti I 7 1 S I 1 pII 1 L... I____________Jm m ~ I gy4 d C O N ®®.®® ~~ ®®®® ~- sx ~~~ i ~- _ -- - , 1 O V C E O Y. V tl O O 2 tl I~I~IYIl~C 2 c_--s ~_ ~C'~ e ~~, amc. Limo. IE itl [AT Q[8 ~icfopa Gardens wo~aonaaanoo aoa aou as •w~u noae ~~ ~ ~ ~~~?~i~E~9,3;~~ ~G~ ~ ~ ~~ `\ ..., \ y \ ~ti ``\ \\ . \ \\ \ `~ \ ..diaol~in d, \ ~~` ~\ ~~ 'ul , 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ e ' yQyQ 9 1 SF,G I ttttt_ ~1 I ~sxa aoej~ ~ ~ + 1 _ _ I I ~ g l i 3NVl aoeav ~~ ~ I ~~ r ~ , li --~a ~ --------- - n ~ ~ h )q I• q~ g s y i /X\ 1]~ ~ I ~ ' 91 5' ~ ~ 1v/`1Yttff~' Y ~ l i 1 il~ _ I ~n s, ~.~ n .. ~ 9 aqua uo~a vuaoiai u _ yy66 p ~ [ ~ YC ~~ e P~ ~~ ~h ~ V a C°.,,:p ~ e e. g a zx a a e= a a le minso-miaase d: ?: .. .: 3 tos uouo evva ws a iG ~ B ~ @a ie ~ 9 ~ ;1 ~ ul ~ ~ ~ ia ~k g ~aiB Y ~ ~ g+ ~ l ~~ e ' ~: :~ ~i ~ ~P o o ~ M i ~ Z i ~ ~ ~ J E ~ m } w z i J i ~ ~ ~ 2 ~_ i w Q' Q \ w \ ~ \ \ ` Q ~\ . 5q~ , t .,. \ , r+o~aanaa vuoo aoa aou aaru~un~aa arno Y~ ` Y ~ ~~ ~ i ~ O~ ~ ~~ ~a ie~;,~fl~i~:s~~° ~E~ i ~E~:o~ E~ 6 ~~~ 9 E z ~~~' ~ ~~[;9 i9 1 ~ ~9Y `~~ a q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~S , i~E1Q 7~ ~ ~ fm~E ~ 5~~ ! ~ ! g~ pp~y~p_9~~~tyq~qty~~~laa„pp~wg,,9~ 7~ Q~ tg~i E~ ~ C1~50 C~1~~ 3 a ~1~~1 ACYCOSCI 3F iiP~i~~ ~ImE~! `-+ + n• +•+v + e+ a ++••f+40 1 ai ~o~aruao au~ aav woaua .rie e _ _ ~ 888 E~~~~~EEE ~;e~ __~~ ~~~~~€~~PE~ve ~f ~~ ~ ,~ ~ Cs ...~.~o sgaaapaagaa q a f noi~uo-r3ui~ E3 a; dekk8$a ~F~ari p a18i p ~4~~ ~; e ~g ~~ Eli ~B~~9a ~mm I' ~~ ffn ~ ~1~~! 3y ~ ''Q ~, 1, a @~°~Plg ~6 1 p p P f1 f Y 0 YS N Q t j e ~ i l l 9 ~ 1181 pp 9 e ~~!!E 99 Y ~1!!I 4e W JL_ 0_ n DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Brent LeCount February 3, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER -The design review of elevations for a 12 plexMulti-Cinema, 2 story 61,283 square foot move theater (AMC) in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, located m the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center at the southeast corner of Cultural Center Drive and Kew Avenue - APN 0227-201-35. Design Parameters The AMC Theater bwldmg will be located towards the northeast corner of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, east of the Cultural Arts Center It, along with the Police Substation, a storage budding, a restaurant and a shop bwldmg will occupy the block contained within Cultural Center Drive to the north, North Mainstreet to the south, Kew Avenue to the west, and Eden Avenue to the east Because of its location, the AMC Theater will be visually prominent from the I-15 Freeway The bwldmg walls are ordained with color and reveal patterns, articulation, and stone file wainscoting, including a long pergola that runs the entire length of the east elevation The pergola provides visual relief and interest along the east side of the budding and also extends north from the northeast corner of the building to lead patrons whom have parked in the north parking lot or the north end of the eastern parking lot (across Eden Avenue) to the entrance to the theater off North Mainstreet The south and west sides of the building have adjoining buildings that will block views of these sides of AMC Theater, except along narrow corridors by movie patrons exiting rear doors of theater r1 U Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outime for Committee discussion Major Issues The applicant's architect has worked diligently with staff over the past months to resolve major design issues Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Raise the parapet at the northeast corner of the building to create a vertical break in the north and east elevation to convey a tower like appearance This will foster a 360-degree architectural quality Staff is open to other methods of enhanang the northeast corner to avoid a boxy, back-door feel 2 Change pergola (i a ,trellis) materials from metal to wood, and plant with climbing vines, consistent with the garden arbor design theme Previous experience with metal trellis systems is that the metal becomes too hot for plants to survive 3 Provide enhanced landscape and hardscape treatment adjacent to the northeast corner of the building to enhance the node function of the north end of the pergola relative to patron pedestrian traffic from the north and east 4 Provide a molding around the curved entry feature as well as a corrnce along the top of the entry The color shall be the same as that of the entry but of a darker shade 5 Coordinate with the mall developer to provide decorative paving to enhance pedestrian walkways, which connect the site with the parking areas to the north and east Also . coordinate the provision of decorative paving within the main plaza area leading up to the theater entrance on the south side of the building 6 Budding wall reveals shall be of sufficient width and depth to provide strong shadows to break ~ ll up building surfaces into the square and rectangular shapes shown on elevations ~ ~ ~~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER • February 3, 2004 Page 2 7 Eliminate the "AMC" sign on the north elevation It will not be visible to a significant portion of the public and instead will be wsible from future residential to the north Furthermore, the other wall-mounted signs are three feet taller than similar wall signs that would be allowed elsewhere in the City so adequate business identification is provided without the northern sign Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee forvvard the protect to the Planning Commission subtect to the above comments and those of the Committee Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Richard Fletcher, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Brent Le Count The Committee recommends approval of the protect subtect to the following conditions to which the applicant agreed 1 Provide a cornice along the top edge of the curved wall on the front entrance to the building and a minimum 1-foot wide molding around the glazed opening at the entry Increase the overall height of the stone file wainscoting at the entry up to the base of the overhead canopy • to foster a richer appearance 2 The Design Revew Committee was in favor of the richer, less bright red color shown at the meeting on February 3, 2004 3 Provide enhanced landscape and hardscape treatment adtacent to the northeast corner of the bwldmg to enhance the node function of the north end of the pergola relative to patron pedestrian traffic from the north and east 4 Coordinate with the mall developer to provide a longer "carpet" hardscape treatment (darker area where fountain is) within the plaza leading into the AMC Theater entrance The water feature shall also be enlarged to be more in proportion to the surrounding bwldmg massing and landscaping and size of the plaza 5 Coordinate with the mall developer to provde decorative paving to enhance pedestrian walkways, which connect the site with the parking areas to the north and east 6 Bwlding wall reveals shall be of sufficient width and depth to provide strong shadows to break up bwldmg surfaces into the square and rectangular shapes shown on elevations 7 Relocate the "AMC" sign on the west side of the north elevation to the east side It is acceptable to enlarge the sign to 8 feet letter height consistent with the sign on the north end of the east elevation Every effort shall be taken to minimize glare from the sign upon future residential development to the north Should any of the future homeowners complain, the sign will either be required to be eliminated or the power shut off during evening/night time hours 8 Add substantial wainscoting on the east and north elevations Provide wainscoting application on the northeast and northwest corners of the building to add visual interest RESOLUTION NO 04-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-01246, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 12-PLEX MULTI-CINEMA, 2 STORY 61,283 SQUARE FOOT MOVIE THEATER (AMC) IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED IN THE VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CULTURAL CENTER DRIVE AND KEW AVENUE - APN 0227-201-35 A Rentals 1 AMC Theater filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-01246 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 11th day of February 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on February 11, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the Victona Gardens Regional Center to be accessed by the internal arculation system of the Center that is connected to Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, and Victona Gardens Lane, and is presently vacant with remnant vineyards, and b The surrounding property is vacant and under construction by the Victona Gardens Regional Center of which the subtect 12-plex theater is a part, with Day Creek Boulevard under construction to the west, Church Street under construction to the north, the I-15 Freewayto the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south, and c The protect is designed with 360-degree architectural quality consistent with the design objectives of the Development Code, and d The protect will provide the community and surrounding region with a conveniently accessible movie theater, and e The protect is part of the master planned Victona Gardens Regional Center and, thereby, exhibits compatibility with the planned surrounding circulation system and development N~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0427 DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER FEBRUARY 11, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findmgs of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed protect is consistent wrath the obtectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the Victona Community Plan, and the purposes of the distract m which the site is located, and c The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Victona Community Plan, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally mtunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 The City Council approved the overall Victona Gardens Regional Center by entenng into a Development Agreement and a Development Disposition Agreement with the applicant, and by approving a Tentative Parcel Map and Victona Community Plan Amendment on February 20, 2002 The City Council adopted a Protect Environmental Impact Report as environmental clearance for these agreements and entitlements The current Development Review application is consistentvnth the scope of work and type of development analyzed by the Protect EIR Furthermore, there have been no changes m the arcumstances surrounding the protect nor has new information surfaced to indicate that the protect would have substantial environmental impacts beyond those discussed m the EIR Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary based upon the findings as follows a The protect is within the scope of that evaluated by the Protect Environmental Impact Report forthe Victona Gardens Master Plan, Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map, Development Disposition Agreement, and Final Environmental Impact Report as certified by the City Council on February 20, 2002 (State Cleannghouse No 20010301028), and b There have been no substantial changes made either to the protect or the circumstances suroundmg the protect since the City Council certified the Protect Environmental Impact Report on February 20, 2002, and c No new information of substantial importance has ansen since the Protect ElRwas certified to indicate that the protect would have significant effects not discussed m the EIR orthat the mitigation measures imposed are infeasible 5 Notwithstanding any other provision or condition m this Resolution, nothing herein shall be interpreted as a waiver or modification of the approved Development Agreement and Master Plan for Victona Gardens, and m the event of any conflict between this Resolution and the Development Agreement or the Master Plan, the Development Agreement or Master Plan shall supersede and be controlling 6 Based upon the findmgs and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference `\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-27 DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER • FEBRUARY 11, 2004 Page 3 Planning Division 1) Provide a cornice along the top edge of the curved wall on the front entrance to the building and a minimum 1-foot wide molding around the glazed opening at the entry Increase the overall height of the stone tde wainscoting at the entry up to the base of the overhead canopy to foster a ncher appearance 2) The Design Review Committee was in favor of the ncher, less bright red color shown at the meeting on February 3, 2004 3) Provide enhanced landscape and hardscape treatment adtacent to the northeast comer of the budding to enhance the node function of the north end of the pergola relative to patron pedestrian traffic from the north and east 4) Coordinate wrath the mall developer to provide a longer "carpet" hardscape treatment (darker area where fountain is) within the plaza leading into the AMC Theater entrance The water feature shall also be enlarged to be more in proportion to the surrounding budding massing and landscaping and size of the plaza . 5) Coordinate vnth the mall developer to provide decorative pawng to enhance pedestrian walkways, which connect the site vnth the parking areas to the north and east 6) Budding wall reveals shall be of suffiaent width and depth to provide strong shadows to break up bwlding surfaces into the square and rectangular shapes shown on elevations 7) Relocate the "AMC" sign on the west side of the north elevation to the east side It is acceptable to enlarge the sign to 8 feet letter height consistent with the sign on the north end of the east elevation Every effort shall be taken to minimize glare from the sign upon future residential development to the north and should any of the future homeowners complain, the sign wdl either be regwred to be eliminated or the power shut off during evening/night time hours 8) Add substantial wainscoting on the east and north elevations Provide wainscoting application on the northeast and northwest comers of the budding to add visual interest 9) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 and the vctona Gardens Master Plan Development Agreement No 01-02 shall apply Enoineenna Droision 1) All pertinent conditions of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 and the Victoria Gardens Master Plan Development Agreement No 01-02 shall apply N~Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-27 DRC2003-01246 -AMC THEATER FEBRUARY 11, 2004 . Page 4 Env~ronmenta/ Mrtigation Measures 1) Protect shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures contained m the Final Environmental Impact Report as certified by the City Counal on February 20, 2002 (State Cleannghouse No 20010301028) The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby • certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r 1~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01246 SUBJECT: AMC THEATER APPLICANT: AMC THEATERS LOCATION: VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING, CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-27, Standard _//_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved _//_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _//_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-04 1 ~1 1 Protect No DRC2003-01246 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the factltties shall not commence until such time as all Unitorm Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submttted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwiding and Safety Division . to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submttted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, ungation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Ctty Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties B Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet Cary standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, _/_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City _/_/_ Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) _/_/_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_/_ d Roll-up doors _/_/_ e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids _/_/_ f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis _/_/_ g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/ to be hidden from view ~ I Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ S~_,_o4 his 2 Protect No ORC2003-01246 ComoleUOn Date 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " _/_/_ 6 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures E. Building Design 1 Ail roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/~_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ bwlding colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped G. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number H. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer _/_/_ SC_,_U4 N~lo 3 Protect N o DRC2003-01246 ComoleUOn Date 3 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/~_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~~_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, , c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Rooi Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system locaton, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditiornng, and g Planning Dvision Project Number (t e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Bwlding and Safety Division 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/ contact the Bwlding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements SC-,-04 , 1 ~~ 4 Protect No DRC2003-012d6 Completion Date L. Site Development SC-1-04 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-01246) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ motor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drarnage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/_ Health Services prior to issuance of building permits 5 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 6 Roofing materials shall be Class "A " _/_/_ 7 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ S Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire . development 3 Lighting m exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ ~'I~ V Prgect No DRC2003-01246 Completion Date P. Security Hardware One-mch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking dewce, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used Q. Windows Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire R. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibt6ty 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet to width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department S. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and to turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED _/_/~ -~-~- ~~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/~ • SC-1-oa i11n s {~' "1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS • January 6, 2004 AMC Theatres Christina Sternberg DRC2003-01246 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located i At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdiwsions and industrial parks ii At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs v The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire vi Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of forty (40) feet from any building 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The requred minimum fire flow for this protect is 3~ gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fve District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Show Existing Fue Hydrants and Mains Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size H2O FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Flre Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Dtstance• When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance ~s measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fue Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 FSC-4 Fire Distract Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined. Fue District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bulding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside firm radius shall be 20-feet c The outside firm radius shall be not less than 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surtace shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Walkways. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings 5 Vegetation. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles Contact the Fire Construction Services (909)477-2713 6 Fire Lane Identrfication• All regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fue District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fue Lanes standard • Nay Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 Candles and open flame in public assembly FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requved plans shall be subm~ted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fve, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In adddion to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fue protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-14 Altemate Materials and Methods The Fve Safety Diwsion will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submdted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption egwpment for the surrounding controlled intersections 2 Reaprocal Access Agreement: The plans as subm~ted indicate that a regwred point of Fire District access a Reqwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan requved below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior to recordation To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Site Plan The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radii, load-bearin ca acct of roadwa surface, etc shall be rovided Naa Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Reaprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting anon- exclusroe easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants, and bwlt-in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Distract, Fire Safety Diwsion The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Droision prior to recordation Contact the Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans "Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The budder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Public Installation. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "lnstallahon of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bulding and Satety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fve Sprinkler System- Plans and Permrt• Plans for the regwred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bwiding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 ~~ ~~ l~ i N o3 • 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire Suppression System: Plans and speafications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking egwpment or other speaal hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 7 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8 Access ControUl raffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permd is requred to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic-calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fue District, Fve Safety Division 9 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted pnor to final building plan approval Contact the Fve Safety Division for specific details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 10 Constructron Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) an-2no 11 Phased Constructron: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fue Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required Frre lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 Address- Other Than Single-family. New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 14 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 15 Frre Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 16 Frre District Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property Contact Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 ~~~