Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/04/14 - Agenda PacketAPRIL 14, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A enda 2 - 6 A, B, C Environmental Assessment & Development 7 - 193 District Amendment DRC2003-01037 Environmental Assessment & Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-01036 D & I Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel 194 - 309 Map SUBTPM16487 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-00987 E & J Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel 310 - 442 Map SUBTPM16323 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-01001 F & K Environmental Assessment & Tentative Parcel 443 - 561 Map SUBTPM16369 Environmental Assessment & Development Review DRC2003-01007 G & H Environmental Assessment & Etiwanda Specific 562 - 656 Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 Environmental Assessment & Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 L Discussion of Roofin Ordinance 657 - 680 • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA jZANCHO Aril 14 2004 - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA I~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roli Call Chairman Maaas _ Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart _ IL ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 24, 2004 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings m which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Comm~ss~on by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limned to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in aRer speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the zone from Community Commercial to Mixed Use fora 7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located north of Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN 0208-151-20 thru 23 Related Fdes Tentative Tract Map PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 14, 2004 Ci~ ONGA 2 SUBTT16567, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC200400139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12 74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots for the development of 18single-family detached condominums and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed Use Distract (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 Related Files Development Distract Amendment DRC2003-01037, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00105, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop 18single-family detached condomnums fronting San Bernardino Road and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation faalities and common area landscaping on 12 74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 Related Files Development Distract Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industrial condominium purposes on 1 2 acre of land, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street -APN 0208-352-11 Related files Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488, and Development Review DRC2003-00988 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 14, 2004 R~~HO (/vcnMONCn 3 E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP -The proposed subdivision of 4 27 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Haven Avenue Overlay Distract and Industrial Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street - APN 0210-081-26 Related files Development Review DRC2003-01001 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 4 23 acres of land into 6 parcels in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue -APN 0229-321-10 Related file Development Review DRC2003-01007 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda Speafic Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on 9 87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway interchange -APN 0228-011-31 Related file Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to master plan and develop a RV storage facility on 9 87 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway interchange - APN 0228-011-31 Related file Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration V. NEW BUSINESS I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 16,448 square foot office budding on 1 2 acre of land in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street -APN 0208-352-11 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488, and Development Review DRC2003-00988 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 14, 2004 jZAxcxo G'UCAMONGA 4 J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS -The master plan and design rewew of 4 two-story office bwldings totaling 66,190 square feet on 4 27 acres of land in the in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street - APN 0210-081-26 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a master planned industrial protect containing 6 industrial buildings totaling 81,812 square feet on 4 23 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue - APN 0229-321-10 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address fhe commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS L DISCUSSION OF ROOFING ORDINANCE -WILLIAM TRUDEAU - A request to change the City's roofing ordinance to allow homeowners the opporturnty to choose between multiple types of roofing products, including but not limited to, changing existing tale roofs to composition shingle VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that hme, theyshall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2004-00336 - HPJ ARCHITECTS n C~ L.J L J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 14, 2004 C~ ONGAJ 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 14, 2004, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code monga Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cuca pp ~C/°"'~.G~-lam If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours pnor to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map • Planning Commission Apri 114, 2004 ~, * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • N City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE April 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the zone from Community Commercial to Mixed Use fora 7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located north of Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN 0208-151-20 thru 23 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development Review • DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12 74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots for the development of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed Use District of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 Related Files Development Distract Amendment DRC2003-01037, Development Review DRC2003-01036, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00105, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop 18 single-family detached condominiums fronting San Bemardino Road and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping on 12 74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues - APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139, and Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 ITEMS A thru C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT A small, 7-acre portion of the site, is being rezoned in conformance with the Mixed Use designation of the General Plan The zone change is necessary to make the project consistent with the adopted General Plan (Exhibit "A") and consistent with the land use of the matority of this block The Mixed Use Distract allows residential development PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 12 24 dwelling units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - San Bernardino Road and Single-family Detached/Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Foothill Boulevard and Retail Commeraal/Community Commeraal East - Commercial and Office/Community Commeraal and Mixed Use West - Mobile Home Park and Single-family Residential/Mixed Use C General Plan Designations Probed Site - Mixed use and Community Commeraal North - Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - General Commeraal East - Mixed Use West - Mixed Use D Site Characteristics The site is composed of several existing parcels with only 11 of the 13 parcels that front on Foothill Boulevard that are occupied by older single-family residences and some converted commeraal and office uses Most of the site is vacant and has not been used for many years The site has frontage on both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard and gently slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent There are several scattered mature trees that are in various stages of decline E Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided 18 Single-Family Plan 1 - 2,543 2 38 36 Garages 36 Garages Detached Plan 2 - 2,858 5 Open 7 Open 138 Townhouse Plan 1 - 1,355 2 41 279 Garage 284 Garage Condominwms up to 34 Open 49 Open Plan 5 - 1,681 Total 354 376 Ir 1 LJ • A-~- Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ORC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 3 ANALYSIS A General The Planning Commission conducted aPre-Application Review workshop on this protect on June 11, 2003, and August 13, 2003 As a mid block in-fill protect, this development has had a number of significant challenges The challenges include relating to the Foothill Boulevard Improvement regwrements on the south, while responding to the different surrounding land uses including single-family detached homes to the north, commercial to the east, and a mobile home community to the west The applicant has responded by using single-family detached units along the San Bemardino Road (north side) frontage as a transition of density and extensive landscape setbacks on the other three sides, in addition to providing multiple pedestrian connections to the Foothill Boulevard frontage for strong linkage to adjacent commercial properties Access to the site is provided via gated driveways on Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardino Road Also, the internal motor court design is reminiscent of the Route 66 Motor Courts historically found along Foothill Boulevard in the past The proposed development has incorporated all of the City's recommended design criteria B Tract Mao and Project Desion The following factors are noted about the Protect • The Commission's policy on 360-degree architecture has been adequately addressed, particularly on the most publicly visible units • Total open space provided at 53 percent exceeds 45 percent regwred at this density • Landscaping is adequate with a total of 588 trees proposed and 585 regwred In addition, 20 percent of the trees are 24-inch or larger • Because the applicant is providing a standard two-car garage per dwelling unit, there are 5 garage spaces provided above the minimum requirement and, in addition, there are 8 open parking spaces above the minimum requrement The open parking spaces appear to be reasonably distributed throughout the development with 33 spaces on the west side and 32 spaces on the east side There are 22 extra parking spaces above mirnmum Code requirements C Master Plan The Master Plan is provided for under Section 17 32 020 Foothill Boulevard Districts of the Development Code and is required as part of the Mixed Use District The previously referenced section states in part "Each Mixed-Use/Retail site shall provide a master plan illustrating land use, site planning, circulation, access, and overall architectural and landscape architectural design concepts (see Section 17 32 030 -Use Regulations) "See Exhibit "B" attached for reference D Neighborhood Meeting The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 14, 2004, which was well attended and generated a good discussion on the design and the concerns of the neighborhood A copy of the meeting minutes is attached for reference (Exhibit "H") During the meeting, the installation of a traffic signal at San Bernardino Road and Archibald Avenue was requested This request will be fulfilled by the applicant in exchange for a Transportation Facility Fee credit A- C~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, AND SUBTT16567-JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 4 E Design Review Committee On March 2, 2004, the DRC Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) unarnmously recommended approval of the protect noting that there were only a few minor issues to consider and that the overall protect was appropriate for the Mixed Use concept A copy of the DRC action is attached for reference (Exhibit "I") F Technical Review Committee On March 2, 2004, the TRC met and recommended moving forward subtect to the conditions attached to the Resolutions of Approval G Environmental Assessment On the basis of the Irntial Study, a Negative Declaration is recommended for Certification CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site A letter of support from Ned G Surati (Owner of Property at 9575 San Bernardino Road, apre-school day care facility) was been received and is attached (Exhibit "J") RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Master Plan by minute action and all other applications by adoption of the attached Resolutions Respecttull bmitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB LH\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Development Distract Amendment Site Layout Exhibit "B" -Master Plan and Development Plans (Provided under separate cover) Exhibit "C" -Tentative Tract Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" -Tentative Tract Detail Site Plan Exhibit "E" -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" -Landscape Master Plan Exhibit "G" -Floor Plans and Budding Elevations Exhibit "H" -January 14, 2004, Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Exhibit "I" -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated March 2, 2004 Exhibit "J" - Letter of Support from Neil G Surati Exhibit "K" -Budding Square Footage Summary Exhibit "L" -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037 Draft Resol ution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01036 r1 n -~ ---------------- ^Qo N, o ppnpJEEU.ONE of y BnUNUM~ LWE 11 r~ ~~ rI I ~r ~~~ o' ~EGEND ESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL ~~~ ~~ I COMMERCIAL SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL SITE MAP FOR DRC2003-01037 (DDA) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT OFFICE PUBLIC MU MIXED USE U UTILITY O OFFICE P PUBLIC CO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLAN r \` EXHIBIT "B" Master Plan and Development Plans Provided Under Separate Cover ~` ~ ~ ''~ ~ S xo~ ~_ U ~ o If ~ !~a~ ~U r~~ 1 ~ ~i a Q ~o Z ~ oa n J ~Q I U ~ U QO pU J Z m_ °~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ U Z W W 3 F- Z Wm ~ W N ~_ F n' m ~p F l1 \~ N / ~ 0 W Wo OL ~ ~ 0 00 W m z~ 0 ~ ;z~ m ~ Io 0 ~ ~o m ,~ T ,K ~~~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Main Street of Route 66 rs a mixed-use revdenhol neighborhood consahng of two residen hal product types single-family detached homes and motorcourf fownhomes The vie is located within the Fonthdl Boulevard Between Archr6uld and //e/Irnnn areo of the Cdy s General Plan Ii a the first portion of this General Plan area to be developed The 13 02-acre site rs bounded by Foothill Boulevard (Route 66J fo the south, San Bernardino Road to the north Foothill Mobile Manor a mobile home park fo the west and a day care center and vacant property fo the east the site plan concept proposes 18 single-family detached fee lot homes and I38 motorcourf townhome condommums the vfe plan provides a single family detached edge olong San Bernardino Road fo remlorce the residential neighborhood character along this street and provides generous landscope setbacks along Foothill Boulevard while orienting the townhome front doors, porches and pnvafe outdoor open space towords the southern perimeter of the sde Development standards /or Main Sireef at Route 66 (tract I6667J shall be esiabLshed per the Detailed Site Plan as approved by the Qty of Rancho Cucamonga The Planning Director shall have authority to interpret setbacks and other development standards as being in substantial conformance with the Defad Site Plan The community will be managed by a Homeowner's Association (HOAJ The HOA will be responvble for the mamteannce of all common area including the gated entries the recreation area including the clubhouse and pool bwldmg all common orea walls and landscaping benches barbeque areas sde furnrt ure such as pergolas and gazebos pnvafe streets Dncludmg sewer, water storm dram asphalt, curb and gufterJ staus etc The HOA will also maintain the exterior painting and roofs of the motorcourf townhome condommmms The individual condommum homeowners will maintain their own excluvve use polio areas and the interior of their homes the HOA will maintain the front yards of the vngle-(omdy detached homes as well as all landscaping occurring oufvde of their private yard fencing The vngle-family detached homeowner will be responvble for maintenance of their interior yard and patio space and ore also responsible for the exterior pain ling and maintenance of then home and root Nevertheless all exterior improvements of any nature are subject to the review and approval of the HOA Vehicular access to the neighborhood is provided along the southern boundary at Foothill Boulevord Vehicular tra(tic a restricted to right m/right out turning movements because there a no median opening along Foothill Boulevard An adddional vehicular entry is locofed near the northeastern portion of the vfe along San Bernardino Road Both entry roads are gated and all interior roadways are pnvafe Pedestnan connechvdy between the existing revden hal neighborhood to the north and Foothill Boulevard to the south a enhanced through the site Pedestnan circ ulahon rs provided by sidewalks and pedestnon paseos that meander through the site Two inviting pedestrian portals are sited along Foothill Boulevard and sidewalks are also located at both neighborhood entries, The pedestnan cuculahon concept (or Main Sf of Route 66 will provide for duect pedestnon cuculahon between the revden hal neighborhoods to the north and the destination retail areas along Foothill Boulevard The townhome buildings are oriented around a common recreation area locofed at the visual terminus o/ the northern entry road and at the eastern end of the interior greenbelt The mom recreation area includes a commundy budding consrshng of meeting rooms and a kdchen pool spa sundeck area resiroom cabana and covered seating h66' o VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Icont ~ Additional open space and recreation areas are located wdhin the site and are easily accessed by neighborhood sidewalks and greenbelt walkways throughout A secondary open space area with a tot lot benches open turf area and accent landscaping a located m the western portion of the interior greenbelt and a thud open space area m the northeastern portion of the site includes a rose garden that further reinforces the archdeciural character of the neighborhood The prolecf has been designed fo address the vaned land uses that surround the sie Exahng vngle-family homes are located across San Bernardino Rood to the north The vie plan proposes single-family homes along the northern portion of the site m order to reflect the existing character m that area This planning concept will strengthen and reinforce the detached residential character of San Bernardino Road within the Master Plan area Fooihdl Boulevard (Route 661 is located duecily south of the vfe The use's sloping topography provides the opporiundy to create some grade ddference between the proposed townhomes and this arsenal street to act as a buffer This buffer provides the landscape foreground o/ the proposed neighborhood from Fooihdl Boulevard Sei well behind the Fooihdl Boulevard right of way the townhomes propose front elevations wrth patios and Irons doors faang Route 66 Layering of low walls and pianimg provide an attractive sireefscape along Fooihdl Boulevard thematic irelhses and walls incorporate devgn elements that reflect the Giy's plon for historic Route 66 6~. The adlacenf land uses to the east and west are a day care facilely and a mobile home park These uses are compatible wdh medium densely revdenhal development the vie plan provides a terrace grading design that minimizes grade dJferences along the perimeter of the sde The planning process has involved the residents of the surrounding neighborhood The budder met wdh the neighbors on several occasions After each meeting the builder made revisions fo the sde plan to incorporate the input from the surrounding community At the request of the neighbors who attended the meetings wdh the builder the revisions to the site plan included incorporating the single family homes along San Bernardino Road relocating the north neighborhood entry fo its current location gating the vehicular access to the neighborhood to e6mmate through traffic from Foothill through the proposed neighborhood and providing pedestrian connectively Irom San Bernardino Rood fo Foothill Boulevard The builder met separately with the owner of Foothill Mobile Manor the adlacenf mobile home park, and proposes fo construct the masonry perimeter wall requested by this neighbor Maln Sfreef of Route 66 proposes private streets with guest parking provided m parallel and perpendicular parking spaces Decorafrve paving a incorporated into the auto-court areas of the townhome bmldmgs at the prolecf enhies and to define pedestrian crosswalk areas wdhm the neighborhood `66 '' ~a- RECREATION CENTER •POOL AND SUN DECK •SPA AND SEAiW ALL •BUlli IN BARBECUE •FlREPLACE AND OUTDOOR PAilO •WOOD PERGOLA WILH ACCENT $tONE COLUMNS •ENiRY PLAZA WITH DECORATIVE PAVING MAIN STREET AT ROUTE 66 ~ ~ ' RECREATION AREA /TOT LOT 66 °~ PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN the Masser Plan for the area defined In the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as "Foothill Boulevard Between Archibald and Hellman" is Intended as a Mixed Use area The area a envivoned as a "minrdatnct" with an Intimate walkable character In tegrahng business and residential and crea ling a dahncf appearance that sets the area apart from other portions of Foothill Boulevard The Crty's Intent os stated m the General Plana "A small but dahnct complex of multi-family houvng that glues the neighborhood a permanent residential anchor " Mom Street of Route 66 provides this permanent revdenhal anchor to ilia Mixed Use area and provides the initial development In the Master Plan area that will revrtahze the "mini-datnct" and the surrounding commundy The sde plan and motorcourt townhome product will add vanety and enhance achvrfy along ilia segment of Pooihdl Boulevard The plan also includes a single family product In the northern portion of the vie along San Bernardino Road to provade a land use transition along the exahng revdenhal neighborhood to the north of the Masser Plan Area The Masser Plan establishes the general land use framework for the area defined by Hellman Avenue to the west Foothill Boulevard (Route 66J to the south Archibald Avenue to the east and San Bernardino Road to the north Klusman Road a local residential street connects Foothill to San Bernardino wdhm the Mosier Plan area and Estanaa Lane connects Klusman to Archibald There are no other public streets wdhm the Masterplan Area The land use con(iq urahons within the Master Plan consat of exerting long- term land uses and future lond uses The long-term land uses Include the exahng Water Dlstnci (acdiiy along San Bernardino Road the office bmlding of Klusman and Foothill existing commercial development along Foothill (including the service station) the exahng vngle family development along Estanaa Lane and the existing residen hal and mobile home pork at the western poriron of the Master Plan area Future Land Uses Include the Mam Street at Route 66 property and the adloceni residential parcels to the east and west of that properly, the cammercal frontage along Foothill near the Hellman and Archibald Intersections the commercal parcel on the southwest corner of San Bernardino and Archlbald and the commercial/office parcel adjacent to the ewshng office complex along Foothtll The Mosier Plan identifies a potential park vie and delines the pedesfnan arc ulahon and proposed sireeiscape design along Foothill Boulevard consateni wdh the Crty's General Plan the proposed sireeiscape design Is consateni wdh the Ofy of Rancho Cucamonga -Foothill Boulevard Hlsionc Route 66 Vauol Improvement Plan PEOESiRIAN ENTRY OFF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD a r 66 TABULATION EXISFING/LONG TERM COMMERCVil.IOFFICE IIAC - - E%ISTING RCSIOENTIAL PROPOSED RFSBIEMIAL FUTURE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE )SAC - - / TOTAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE 96AC - - L%141NG FUNRP EXISTMG I LONG TERM RFSIDFNIIGL 9 d AC - - COMMCRCIAL COMAfERCULL O ® m PROPOSED RFSIDENf1AL I]IAC 156 DU 119 DUPC FUTURE AESIDENFIAL BdAC Sd DU 1390U/AC ~ E%ISTINC Ot41C4 FUNRC OFFICE TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 159nC 310 DU IEIDUPC CXISTDIG PUBLIC FACll.ITY 29AC - - ~ F%ISTING PUBLIC ~ ~ S E J.IC/4/ TOTAL: 775AC FACILITY PA RI( C vEHILULAR PEUESTRIAN F ~ -~ ACCESS ~ ACCL95 I T N 5 I °"`° W, LAND USE PLAN ~I~ 1^_~' GROUP ~i FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARC HIBALD AND HELLMAN -- a `~- ARCHIeALD ncnvlrY CENTER PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FORMAL SfREETSCAPE DESIGN TMNSI I TONAL STRLLTSCAP4 U451GN ~` . 66 ° 6 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD /ROUTE 66 SCENIC CORRIDOR The streeiscape along Foothill Boulevard will reflect the histoncal character of Route 66 the Foothill Boulevard Hatonc Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan identifies an achvdy center ai the in fersechon of Foothill and Archibald Avenue the intent of this Master Plan Is to identify the Archibald Achvdy Center and the streeiscape design proposed for the Foothill Boulevard frontage Commeraal corners ai Hellmon and Archibald will provide a /ormal streeiscape design consatent wish the Visual Improvement Plon The frontage area along the Mom Sheet of Roufe 66 mixed-use revdenhal neighborhood is designed as a transdronal sfreeiscape design The Visual Improvement plan calls for a meandering sidewalk along residential development A low seat wall at the base o/ a landscaped slope is proposed along the meandering sidewalk Focal pedesinan entry portals rein/orce the historic icons of Roufe 66 and identify pedesinan connec hng from the destination retail along Foothill Boulevard and future residents within Ma(n Sfreef of Roufe bb and existing residential neighborhoods to the north n ~~ 66 °' PEDESTRIAN ENTRY OFF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FOOTHILL PLAN VIEW STREETSCENE ELEVATION eouLSV~ ~• 66 Two pedestrian entry features with stone columns and wood pergolas are spaced along the Foothill /roniage reinforce the historic character o! Route 66 Route 66 icons are proposed on the stone columns The entry }o Main Sfreel of Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard will also reflect the historic character of Route 66 A thematic logo wdh Route 66 imagery will be incorporated m the neighborhood entry walls the proposed landscape palette uhhzed plant matenal that is mdigenous to the region and the landscape concept is reflective of older neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga the plant material wiih~n the parkway and on the landscaped slopes faang Foothill Boulevard will be consrsteni with the Foothill Boulevard/Hafonc Route bb Visual Improvement Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Master Landscape Plan The landscape treatment will provide a lush layering of plant matenal and wtll soften the massing of the proposed fownhome buildings COURTYARD WALLS AND ENTRY GATES _= n, a 1°o aF~~o, ' v 66 io ~m.~n+. u...:u. •~~ PLAV IA PIAP SC PfAN IB PLAN lA ^n.unrm. S F D STREETSCENE SAN BERNARDINO -CROSS SECTION ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ._i _ - ~, ~, "j ,, MOTORCOURT STREETSCENE ~ ~ r 66 °~ ii w+OiOR000Rt ELEVa LION SEE BELOW r.w~~~wa~imawinwurwnnua ~_~~,~~ ',on„u' ~„mia~~p w.uw.n ~ }. I I lI ~~ SUS-2LL (606) ON Hd bLBL6 YJ 'MgHOJ 001 3INI5 133XlS NOJMb 3 SSL S3/pG4 OxM Av,V/' mm ~rcia nm,~ °a,.e®_ ~~_ 13} f(010b~~COIIH'0 tlfDIIfBOS ~~ee:.~ ae:. IMbOCilLYN71tBY L9S9f 1J1'Nl 3.1/11'lN3l Fl!lM dNYACYLYI1Ln~6 SLFwD N4 IJIW L1LifU 4~MV 7y~ ggwm~a e D R ? ~ p ; ; 9 Ct~~ !~ e~ ! p 0 p @ ~~__!~ ~,,~~p // p ~7d11- ~CLj- Y x ,e _ ~ ~ ti~ € ~ g _ .Q _ ~ J -f . ~C~cZio ~~""pp~ th _ ,f., '}{ ~ Hwy ,j{ ...,,,' ~' ~ g 4r o ,. ~ 8 ~a~.. p _ : O > ~ ~. s. 1 .n! V ~ ~ ' ~ a ~ ? y ~ .. ~. ~ t fn ~f tl •/ `w ~C f C Y ' I i t, . \ t ~ f t 9= I I r / ,.ir I µs__~ "a"- ~n -t z !. ~3'. it ^r. w •'' - 1 I ~ ~ .1• D~ _ ~ a' aCr s d "~" I N ~y ~ f i Ap F•if ~ ~~' 2 .<~+ ' yi ~ +I ~I ~. ~ .~~wlll ~~~~ I/ ~ ~-11 - t~ ~ -1~' 4'~.d~ yjyy~'~- ~ ~ ~ i f ~. _~i_ .f~ .ni-~ Fad try ~ a r . ~. .I.., I_ I~ I l l i i t ~ I I~ ~ ~~ 1~-L- , ~~,_,, ~~ sus-ra leoSJ oN fu oars n ~ 001 ]/b1S 133N[S NOJ~wY 7 SSZ SAWII 0//M /xY0/' Yvm m ~~~ s~ ~ m.. .r say 99 . e rro~o-roasam ernmons ~w'm~iw'iaeiw i L9S91 lJYN1 3A/lY1NJ[ M,y~,n~ , en.~o w ~anw uww arw _ ~~ I ~~ _ _ __ ____ _ l~ - _ ;.,~ Y -~_ ii ~i~ ______ _ __ __ ___~ afro Yr2'I 9WSVJ __ _- _l r_ -~ a • ' __ _ ? _ ._ _ ~~ -- L: slls-ur (sos/ av Ne 6rB16 YJ 1TYk'O7 OVA 7/MI$ L3Jtlf5 nY.UV/N ] SSr s3irolr 'JNM ,wqf mm :amm ar~~ns rm 99 srmo-roorwo ncswsns :,,..~~ nn ubn awemv'n~ ;, [959/ I7ry1 3n/1r1N3! ~41~o0.'n ~~+~+ ~n'vdaw'mu~m :~ .... b 5~~- ~~~RR€ c 3 vYV~ ~ ~ e I 4 ~g gII ¢~ 6~ ~ m P 1 C f~ 4§ ti 9i9F~ ` o®®;, ~ ~ !d y -'`~ ~~ i ~ ~ i "~"~ a~ @~j i ai p ~ Ot3 `~ ~ v} -S ~ 7 ~i 6Gi ~I ~i Si P jOio' aP °Q 4Z~~ $~ is i . ° ~ ~ of°~Ec W ~ ~ :~ g A/ '~ c 1 _ i ~ U tiw~ ` cS i E~ i:4 ~ v' ~. wF~~~ ,. Ek 8 t~ _----, r Fn', ~ "' ~ i~ Ifi ~ i P ~ ~iP', P ~ ~ .i r Ji '~ i i -~G ~ : I G 'G yrl - ~ P. A =S- P A `~ ~~, --~- / PHA j i ~' p; PSi , ~~- -N~ P I ~, - ~~, _ '` r',i ,, _~ ~ ~ i~,~ °~~, >,~ /E6"Flu`~mvz~= tsss[b~1~n~~~sat=tirn~r --~ - -------- ------ ---~---- --- ,~. , r I I -,r - ~ . ~ -- I; ~ _ ~ ~; ~ ~ - , _ ' '' ~ --_ _~ -- _ Ijr~ ~ ;_ - _-_ - ~ .--- _-- . - r-~ _ - - -~~ i .- ----- - --- _ _____.__.._ ---- _ -____ `~. ~_~_tr o~,e _ -e ~ 111H 100! I ~ - _ -_-_ _ _ _ 6 _ ~ ~ ' ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ =~ ' I I . ~ - ~ ~ ~ r;; ~I; ; w ;, , ~ ; ®m m® ~ ® ~~ a v ,.~,~ -~ ( ~ ~.~ ~ ' ~Y~ p y ~ ~ Y~i __ I~~a 1 s. _ _ r r 1 ) 1 _ i ®® _- - ~- I ~ 1 1 • ~ _ T , _ ~ _ .. - - c y .~ - .~- =~ ~ ~ k r ~ YI ~ _ r ~Y V ~® ~ ~ 1 .A m ~ #i~ ~! ~ -- --- -- '~i ~~ .~ D,... e1J ~ - ~ ~ - ~~` 1 s ~ ®mmm . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® _ ~ 4 ,~,~,~ gj~. f `~"~Q~ a n 1 - ~ - r ~~ I ~~ - ~ N. II~~~ ~ a ~.! k ~ /fFf ' ~ J . ,, I I I - - 1 -' t' ~ dl~ I IIII e ~ - - ~ ~I t~ i~ - e _ _ ~-: -~ r_, 3r q ~ ~ ri ~ ~ _ A I ~ / ~ _ J~~~ 'u~l di 1 it ' ~ ~ III r ~~ ~~ I ~i cgs ~~~~ ~ I„ I~~ ~ ~ _ ~ + , , g I i )~ r 11 ~I -i I ~~ I~ ym~~ ,~~~ ~ ~,; !~~' +1_-- ~ -, ~'~I I 'N6'7d 9N/OV?ID 7V!]~Ld~ON00 §.p uor awiwov rr ssao saoa uon rzar awaw nm r" ~ ~~ ~ 17NN(4fI7q J(1 S(YJ$ 'ONIQYYNtl3B NYS JO .1.{N/10.J 'IJNOIrYJIIJ ONJNYN JO J.IlJ 9NJ NI ~9B9J 'ON d.~V?LL ~ALL6'dN~.L S350d7//ld fYl1/N/WOONOJ rYOd 1 '~ +! ~Ir ._!~a-w-___~.-_. __ I 4 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ . . ~. . g~. .. ~. n~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~~ ?E ~~ E c' ~P 9, SE 5 ~ ~ ~~ ~€ ~2 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ®g®~o0o0a ~ 0~ C i ~a~{~]]~tf gl ~~lS jkail~~t~i~~~~~s ~~ tl jlii~~iij4i~(}~ 11111;111111d~1~ ~~ g -- ~~ ~~s 5~~~ i. k... . ~ 4 a~i " xz_ d~~g 88P ~~~~ ~~~ ey.. eca p-{ i ~~~ ~$6~ R 8 ~ ~ ~`y € i R 7 E ~ ¢ ~`~ ~ a ~~~~~~ l~ `\ _ ~~:. t s~ ~ { '® ~~ { t 9" ~ ~ t `~ ~ g ~F~j~ ~{j~~l~$~~t ~i~'tili[~iEi;~~~93~ ~~~~~i~3~#~~~~~~rt~ ~ooooo000000 = 00000 0 a 4 o ` z ~ 4 3~ ~~ S E k0 iLL ~ ~6-V $ g ~ O ~?~ v S~O~ it pSVC~ GZ~¢ p~~ ~~H ~~ oN ~i o~~ O ~~ qi z 4,~ ~e v 6 pE ~ ~tl 9; Qi6 ~~ z ~is v € y ~~ O I A c-\2 ~I;r ~e+ e ~ ~® rc a J {($OJ_~. d, N Q~ ~a d i~ '~ Z e V/~ 0 J ~~ 6 ~../ D 4 ~~ J 4 ~O F~ U ~ 6 ~2~ ~/~ ~1..y Ze- V `/ OJ4 Z~ Q ~~O • ~~ ~~ ~a ~~ i W~+"/ a® d I 's s ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ f L ; ' ~ § ~ j~tl.9 s`t ~~ E t s ~ != 3 ~ ~ ~_ 5~~ ~~~;f~f ~~33~ f~'~ep~~ V ~9~s $~B~~j~~g~a~a ~il~jaf~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~€4e~~~=~~~~~ a ~oo0 000000®00000000000®®00 0 J A ~[/~ L / ~ V \~ O S~~ VO ~a ~Q~ c ie ~f~ ~ ~ ~ `aiR '+M '~`-_~~ F T 4 b ~-c, ~a S O 4 4 D Cf 4 V ~../ Z J 3 ~® 3 4 a ~D ° .O .`_. Z 0 .. 3~ s ~ggq~g ~oC L'/SY 4LL(6 s3woH ON~tlI wool oU ~,. vwa,m ir~vor+owv~n>oi<~va =~ 4~UI~100~111ft100t 9N01~ N011~~~1?1U0143)NO) ce=.~ ~tl~ ONtlA3'Ifl08l'IailOOJ WO1H H.LllON ONIJIOOI NOLLtlA3'13 1~` r ~~ ¢ 4~M1ryy1/~~ .~ e19~t:! ,s~~ ipy~ ~` d s£ i • ~p p35 5a~ app~ 99 O F a ~'4 O~ ~^ CJ ~6 O~ rc E E g e ~: ~~ ~~ ~€ -~ 3® ~ ' FZ W u rc a ~o mm Z~ 5 `. L6 C~ O V z C Z ...-~ 1-- f w v 4 0 0 0 E a 4 0 Z 4 ~' J ~~ 0 5~ FJ V~ 3 z5~ a ~_ ~o; `I Second Floor Plan Plan 2-1364 sf 255 E Rincon Strcet Ste 100 Caro ne, Caltfornie 92879 1370 bhn W~ (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 B°~ _ N yJ ~ w v Bdrm 3 M w r 0 _; ~ '~ l ~ _ ~_`z_ ~ Q ~ t M auer HdI>a M,M Mr, Second Floor Plan Plan 1 - 1355 s f UNIT PLANS M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~, BUB7TN16S67 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cuca~nga, California A-1 KT6~( r..e r ... ;, ~ 3 crar ...r x uw F1rst Floor Plan First Floor Plan - -1-- et drm was Second Floor Plan m - - --® _-- ~_ -•-~ ~ -I R h Ir ~ p+lt~ %IZ. I • ». n ~_ E~ _ ` e r.. ° _ 9 _ "° ~ u Liry1Ne Fvst Floor P lan sr Plan 4 - 1334 s f 255 E Rincon Ssrcc r, Slc 100 Corona Cal iforn~e 92879-1130 IuW W~Blbn~s (909)272-5100 FAX (909)7JR-9454 Baw w2 -- Lott/ Hdrm 3 ww 6are~e w t6' 2TY I I t , , i a O = w,. ~ ~ i ewee _ .~a 6anee NV ~ y }r ~ ~~ ~ , First Floor Plan Plan 3 - 1360 s f UNIT PLANS M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ,~ SUBTT~16567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho Cucam onga, Calif otnia A-2 KT6Y GT2IX1Pr d trot rm++a r....sr w ero, Second Ploor Plan Motor eery N,M M,~, Barm i ww Bdrm 3 N,M Nr! /11~ ~ 1 PrLLo ..~.r yw §_ O ~_ i Second Floor Plan f! Y ~• r err ~ M1 ~ ((,+ Lim p~N t T F .~.. a C Q~raee w ii, ~ r~r v'. I ~•w Dini°rt - ® ~. _ 'r ]ri• Iri' r sr r First Floor Plan Plan 4-B - 1439 s f UNIT PLANS 255 E Rincan xirc cl Sic 100 Coro ne Cell ro role 928]9-1770 ~~ . (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 73x.9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ SUBTTA165 DRC2003-01036 Rancho Cuca nga, California Second Floor Plan W ir' rr rr ]rr q - _- - _ __ __ _ __ _ ____ _ h u N ~I ~)aE E(~ ~ v~.a w Puio Entrv _ f. sa d~nae P Wk~• ~ M ~ .rr ~ - ,~, 4 .. .. _ ~~ S,p -- _~ w ..4 M ~ First Floor Plan Plan 4A - 1334 s f A-3 KT6r • ~1••`. ~~ Second Fioor Plan Plan 5 - 1681 s f F1rst Floor Plan UNIT PLANS i~ 255 E Rincon 51rce1 51c 100 Corane, Celifc rn~e 928]9 IJJO b1+~Lwpilame (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) ]3a-9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~, SUBTTN16567 DRCf003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, Call [ornia A-0 KTO~:m crop xes~>a mw a eeee to vl~ eallalnc omov.eer R•1 / U 1 lyp v mo•roe0 WM noon aeae s,lt2 at af.a.c f.rn u Oaem0 noor. ofJfe fJ30 at ewale, wl.l. 19Jf1 .r N~ l F1rst Floor Plan 10-PLEX BUILDING f, J 255 E Rincon Slrce~ Sic 100 7f!~~1tl1 Cotane, Celifornn 92879-I )JO ~ (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 778-9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTTM1656]]]...,,,,~,DDR C3003 01036 Rancho Cuca ga, California A•5 KT6~ f CIRdJP~•.... .. =~•=: eraT 4 few C' u i Second Floor Plen 10- PLEX BUILDING 255 E Rincon Slreel Sle 100 u. Corona, Cali to role 92879-1770 FJm WN thaw (909) 272 5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTTR16567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California • A-6 KT6^aq_-~ ~r~~i ~'~~ ~~~ not wesur aa.w ~4 waa 1, 255 E Rincon S1rcc 1, Ste 100 Corona Cali (o rn ie 92A79 I)IU lduda4~ (909)272-5100 PAX (909) 738 945d Roof Plan Elevatlon'A' 10-PLEX BUILDING M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~, SUB1TN1 6567 DRC]003-01036 Rancho Cuca ~nga, Call f ornia A-7 KT6C OUP~.M rrar w A4 ieel • Front Eleveton Slde Elevenon IcR mE RIM Elrnlbn RonIW _ i~ a..~~ k ~ ------ ~ ~ w ;~_~ y ~ ~ .,. is^, r Rear Elevenon !; ~J 255 E Rlncon Slrccl Stc 100 ~'J!CTJ„I Cornne Cel lfornn 92879 1730 bM1s1 Ib~a. (909) 272-5100 FAX (9U9) 738-9454 .. ~. IO- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "A" M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTTM16567 DRC3003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California Key Notes. OI c®.a rv ro. nmr Qz wwl~W,~r.• Qi ~.. ~..sm..e r.a r~ O wmITJ. OS wme wa. © C.I..W 4ge9z Y.m Qi ~~~ OR wme,... r~ O9 o.vJW.am. IO wak srk s4-.R ii wme o.mc,. 13 wme e.. a,.s i/ wma ticn IS ~w. maalrwm ra.m 16 rent snl~.l c.~.m I© weoer.,eJ IB rr e~p yHr.n cm.m ntra raa WJI W M' iotaY Letl Gr 19 .nwJr 2~ eae,.e wA.ecaam A-8 KT6Y CROIFI-. •rot Raoul i..w w us. r z55 E Rlncon $trnel $le 100 s• Corona Cell forn is 978]9-1770 kM (909) P2-5100 FAX (909) AP-9454 ~' Courtyard Elevation rur~ a'(EI Side Sm1iW Rear Courtyard Elevation M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTCA16567 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cuca~nga, California Key Notes Q CmaNefl~Tl4 amr : ~ 0 s.~e rid~ua...r ra,T~ OI Wm1Tr6 O Wm1iv1 © lLSNI~eSweevm O 641V® © wmlylT~m O9 sar+.. sam. 10 9•g45ry45•ia I I Ib®slS~ I] wmeams:,. I7 Wmea.r~4.r 14 wme4.oy IS smee.mre rsd r~ 16 Ne.l" •or~e mr I] Wmeud 19 Tr sW Sµl r.>ravum r.. Wn~x-rn.l. swia4 19 rrsu Bred Wd Celum A-9 KT6mr*rS~i~/t ..6 [re~>~rnw M fdka Front Courtyard Elevation 10- PLEX BOILDING ELEVATION wArr " C~ l.J ]55 E Rincon Slre el, Sre 100 Corona, Ca Lforn re 91P79 1770 1dmW~Flom (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) ]78-9454 Roof Plan Elevallon'B' 10- PLEX BUILDING M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ SU8TTA16567 DRC2003.01036 Rancho Cucamonga, Caltforala A-10 KT6C C,120UP1• :. aror »um m..,. w eeee ~\~) \^l l~ i~ 155 E Rincon Street, Src 100 Corona, California 91879 laJn I"M (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 r 10- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "B" M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 r,, SUB7TA16367 DRC1003 01036 Rancho C u c e~ a g a, C a l i f o r n i a Front Elevatmn Side Elevation ~~vq 0.ieM Ele~+ew Sm~ilr Rear Elevation Key Notes: O Cm,leNTkllml O Wk 4e4m iLi OJ Sd neMfemwv,m~]A, O wane !O wd r..k © avr.a l.as, m.v® O] mav® O wdrw~n.. O9 om.".am. 10 pade,pk sua II ne~mri sr~w Iz wdaed... u wd a..,~ 11 wd aaq IS s.a. a."er,...s ras.m I6 skin s:m.i c.~m. I] wd~ IB ,r krss,k,e cmay"y te. w.n~a Tassel c.e 19 tern em.dwdnek® A-11 KT6Y 1 ~. r~~ ..a.n ». xaa ~\/t N • Courtyard Elevation loll mE RiSRI Sih SenIW Rear Courtyard Elevation 255 E Renton Street, Ste I00 Corona Cel lforn lR 928'/9 1370 kJu, WM tbnr (909) 2'12-5100 FAX (909) 73a-9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBITA16567 DRC1003-01036 RaBCho Cucamonga, California Key Notes Q t~,aY,~..~r O LYb Le LUmiM OJ SN fYlrfsnvavi®Tm O/ wm,Rn OS Wm, i,eL © L1iYN1~, ASV® O1 dd Vma O wr r..lTY. O9 oa.~.. SYSn 10 ShMfryR SYfq II xv®.I SSrt 12 wmeoumkn 13 wmaR- •. IA wme uny IS s®`_ .r..arm 16 .... aemlc.yeo,s IS ,r L~l T,s~ve c®..em im WY1lY iWI~SMfrt 19 tneMl nmrtl Wptl Caleu A-12 Kral ~~~.-* r~.~" RTIIT mRYm m...T IR. xw Front Courtyard Elevation 10- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "B"N• ` u vl~ emlmec omay.a~ a.•1 ~ U•1 7YVe V mo•ntaa POU tkw: nnae g41t at. sRre te~ s,7K r.t amens floor an0 e 10,163 R.f. swmel ww. 23A13 R t n~ l ~ I Fvst Floor Plen 12- PLEX BUILDING I. `7 255 F Rincon Slrcel Stc 100 '~~fYy~~ Corona Celifornre 92R)9 I7I0 4M1 (909) 272-5100 FAX (9(19) 7J8 9454 r M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTTR16567 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cuca~nge, Callfornin A•13 KT6 crot ~u M aea J~ Second Floor Plan 12- PLEX BUILDING ~ 255 E Rincon svecl sip loo Corona Cal~(ornie 92879 1370 bMl A~noa, (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) 73R-9454 ,~ ,. M A I A T ancho N S T R E E T R O U T E 6 6 ee SUB1TM16567 DRC2003.01036 Cucamonga, California ^'14 KT6Y C173011Pi ~~~ ,^; *?~ ;;^,7;5; ; ;~; cror »uin ~....rs w as ~' Roof Plnn Elevehon'A' 12-PLEX BUILDING ~~ 255 E Rincon Slree 1, Sle 100 Corona California 92679-1370 Ids (909) 2'12-5100 FAX (909) 776-9454 M A I A T Rancho N S T R E E T R O U T E 6 6 ~, SUBITRI6567 DRC3003-01036 ~Cuca nga, California ® A-Is KT6YC~xoua,.:. ; --';-' ^^r""!(55;:'„^„'. aro. au.ua aa, aaa ~J t W U~ f, J 255 E Rlncon Slreel Ste 100 7J?C'JI°I Coron4 Callfornle 92879-I JJO b8.~^Ri6."n (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) 7J6-9454 12- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "A" M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUB7TA16567 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California Front Elevahon Slde Elevahon fell vd R18ht Elmvwm SImIW Rear Elevahon Key Notes O C"ene NTiktml O Lr/kla, yrtmiM OJ SNflNd SV¢a pv fart TYn O wMTIw OS Wdisk © LVYdIey,Sew V"m O bd Vaav OB WmCMITds nen..k. a.n. l0 a„k Sryk sdy I1 x.m.lny Iz wa,eo.._. Il wme a...en: Id Wrte uuy 16 ~iau~c"r.om 17 W,.ard.l IB ,r,We fgnier m.d iY WJIIM T/vYgslfi 19 r~u e.."a woes rd® A-16 uray' ssr.'.ro.`: r~ ~•~~ ctot ~anm L.w r4 ww Rear Courtyard Elevanon Front Courtyard Elevatlon ~~ 255 E Rlncon Strce r, Stc 100 Coron! Call fJrnle 92879 1770 bMt. (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 7Ja-9454 12- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "A" M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~, SUB7Ttl16567 DRC200101036 Rancho C u c a~ n g a, C a l i f o r n i a Key Notes QI c..WW rY ru,imr QQ uea l~.smwTma. Ol sr r,Jasm..,e lusTm O wmana O Wmaiss © MeN We YeVam O Bm1V® O Mm1MlTm O9 davWY9sn~ la SYwk Sryk SJYw it Nsuunl5~iq Il WmegNmb. U wme e.w.Y.W Id wma Ya.W IS s~e.ce.a r.dram 16 uWJ S.amwr~~ I] W.aCblJ 18 ar Yp roY r.:r .n mvf iOp WJI! M TidaY 9sIGWe 19 rwear 2® e.Ww ww r.Ye. A-17 ~~~ ['10Y ~uWCn M. lOM c~ f~ ~~r s • • Roof Plan Eleva0on'B' 12-PLEX BUILDING 255 F Rincon Slrcc 1, Slc 100 Corona Celi forme 928'/9-I Jl0 bM W~{imv, (909)2'12-5100 FAX (909)"!1ft-9454 M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTTi16567 DRC3003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California A-18 KT6m. T ~fti~ R ^... ~ ~~ If OT fOLLtll lYYO X HM /11 !~_~ zss a aincnn slrenr, sIR loo '1~.' Corone Cellfo role 928]9-1330 bMa~r (909) 272-5100 FAX (9n9) 7J8-9454 12- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATION "B" M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 SUBTT+l1636 DRC3003-01036 Rancho Cuca~ nge, California Front Elevation Side Elevahon iuRc~ R~iM Elrn4wv SImN Reer Elevation Key Notes O Cmane NTh RmI O2 Nwl~ew®r.e OJ s.~a rm,a s.®ewrm nv O Wr Tm OS Wme r..k © nre..a W.a.ev® Q mia v".. OR Wm1 r..etn. O9 o..W~.._._ la ugkeyk SNq 11 im®rsaq 12 wmeae.w IJ We.enea,o Id WmJ 4Aq IS s.a.ewrr."ecs0 16 wv.~k:ea~c.,p tm I© wmea.wl IB meWeyc~rec.."e~ua r.. wela u-na.k.s~u~ (] 19 rJdeR aWW"a wme ca® A-19 KTdY Cl20l.Pi..W cmv R• • •• ,....~ grieve ~t ~~ 235 E Rlncon Slrccr, Slc 100 Coronr, Cel i(ornle 928]9 1330 bM Lwplbw. (909)2]2-5100 FAX (909)]Jft-9454 Rlght Courtyazd Elevahon lea nW Rlghl 514s 9mlav Reer Courtyard Elevahon M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ SUH1TrR16567 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California Key Notes• OI fawele fW TJetwi O Libra Aem iMd OJ fMMdSbavwp ianTm O wm1Tm SO wmai... © alnme Ly.va v.a O7 a.a vm.. O9 wme re.•rn. O9 Aeu+rveAwn la Slupk sryk Sdp II Nvlvnnlldip 13 wme wxmr.,. Il wme tmetnm 14 wmak.np; IS snm<r.w ia.icennn 16 MnY Smemtl G.ye Rv 1] wa1Rh1 IB u~nMsN~~iacm.n.eke r.. wYls x. nmb, volts 19 rda.v Bdkrttl WmlCdu~ A-20 KTGiY C7~ i ~~. ~~"n.,.1"~~)IS ~.s trot ra4r.rn ruw x mei Front Courtyard Elevation 12- PLEX BUILDING ELEVATIONN•"B" /' u' 1o s' 8'-0- 114• b o v Q D / ~ 1\ ( \ Pool •~ ~ ~ ~°~ !r N ~ 0 0 l n~ POOL H U I L D I N O 6 3 0 9 P 255 E Rincon Slreer Sre 100 Corona California 928]9-1770 ) ~ 1909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) 73R-9454 Ir-r ra• n o- off C~ , - BIwOhOa ~a _________ r___________________ ______~ O ~ \ ' J\ Commoe Roo m ~ _ __ __ w ,. ~~ ____________________ I___________________ ______ ______~ _______ a w::a wel4_______ m.° wwa 1/'-0• II' 0• 173• 4P$ COMMUNITY B U I L D I N G 1 9 7 9 S F COMMUNITY & POOL BUILDING M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ,~ SUBTTN16367 DRC2003.01036 Rancho Cuca~ga, California RIAh bme wra CI wie~ I Clmle~ Z a./ S A L B S F A V I L L I O N CONFIOU RATION 1979 gF A-21 KT6Y GROUPI cror asasl •••••• q~mw ! ! ~ I1~^' ~i~ 233 E Rincon Suee4 Sle 100 Corona Celiforme 92879-IJJa 1~IrN Ibm. (909) 2]2-3100 FAX (909) ]3a-9434 Entry /Plaza Elevation Pool Side Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS COMMUNITY BUILDING M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ SUBTTR16567 DRC2003 01036 Rancho Cucamonga, Cal t forme Key Notes: Oi c®rrl+Tr emr Q wk~.~..r lO e.drda sWaee`.r®Ta. Q wmene OS wme r... © eae.m u{e smsv® O e.av® O WmIMeTm O9 0¢viin 9wa 10 ,ti.,k:u..Sa, 11 rb®WISIa~ 12 wmeo~, IJ W¢l Res~6v II wme ewy IS rw.. rieac~ 16 ued sm.ia.~eom I] wmerda 18 ce.va. ekn r.uew.o 19 r.... 2~ a.e,.a waaeca~.m A-22 KT6Yn..T-S"'I~SIiS'~~~~ i iL ~ esp. eao>r wuw ruwr ». u9e Street / Alght Elevation Rear Elevation ~J f ~ - f ~ j Q Q mm ;d a ~ Roo( Plan 253 E R~ncon Streer, Sle 100 Corona Celr(orn~e 918]9 1370 bMl ym„ (909) 2]2-slnu FAX (909) 73R-9454 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS POOL BUILDING M A I N S T R E E T A T R O U T E 6 6 9U BTTd16567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho C uca~nga, Ca lifornln Pool Slde Elevanon Key Notes: OI cmurr rk Mr Qz up iow®rr~ Ol s.w nae ~....r..Tm O/ w~anr O WmI FSY © (11Yd W~lveV® O &vV® O wmI M4TrYe O9 nm~M ~e 10 LqY wFk sdy II n~r.ls~ 12 wmemrae 13 wedn~e 11 wmenay IS S,m F:,l Cam 16 u,.i,.. .c... oe I] waal Cab IB C®ee YA Mewl 19 wa4r a.w w,dun.. A•23 KT6Y C,T201P1•m ,.;;r:: ~iT.SF..~~: trot ~..w M fw Rlght Elevanon Street /Rear Elevanon s i i~ 255 E R,ncon Street, Ste 100 Carona Cal~forn is 92879 1310 IoMwnpHomee (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 738-9454 i CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 THE BUNGALOWS A T R O U T E 6 6 ~ SUBTT~l16567 DRC2003 0103fi Rancho Cucamonga, California Key Notes: O C efL Tik Mar O LITIVISe AUm IYe~ O SW fInLSmwmimnilr IO WmtlTrki O Wml faun © CJlued lade 9,me Vev O7 eon Vnp O Wmd MIT,Fs O9 nno+rveAwn IU Sbgk 5ryk 5Jq II r~wswq 12 wmdgdo.b,. U wmex,~,b.a 1/ wmd un.Y IS smeb.ecdm 16 MNJ 9uamal GvyeUa 17 wmecwu 18 caoa<atr, nne w.e 19 mane 2® enk.ad wowcnfm a-za KT6Y CROIPr..y ~""J3 :^^.SS:~ ~: tiOY fCOTIa 0.mM M. ]M] Plan 1 Elevatron A -Ranch Plan 1 Elevation B - Amencana Plan 1 Elevation C - Creftsman a.a....wa.rr• BAnas N r, at e N 255 E Rrncon Street Ste 100 ~ Cora ne, California 92879 1770 bll Y~r (909) 272-5100 FAX 1909) 7JR-9454 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN I - 2250 s f THE BUNGALOWS A T R O U T E 6 6 SUB1T+l16567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho Cuca~nga, California Optional Hdrm 4 A-25 KT61( GROUPr.,.. ~~~i AMT at K fam Second Floor Arta 918af y~r V Left Elevation Rtght Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN I -"A" THE BUNGALOW S ~ 3SS E Rincon Sveel Sre 100 Cur"tie Cali forme 93879 i3)o A T R O U T E 6 6 r~ Wu,iy~ Ike (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) 71R-9454 SUBTTMI6361 DRC200)-01036 ._, Rancho Cucamonga, California a \y~ m m ae "A" Root Plan Dnve Elevaton A•26 KT6~-~ ~i [MT fMYlfl Oe~ly K ]Mf Left Elevation LJ I~ 255 E Rincon Rrtcci Sle 100 Corona, Celi forme 92A09 Il)0 ~ ly (909) 272-5100 FnX (909) 73R 9d5a ~5 Right Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 -"B" THE BUNGALOWS A T R O U T E 6 6 SUB7Tt116567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho C u c a~n g a, C a l i f o r n i a Dnve Elevation A-27 KTGY CS20UPf ~.~. c+o~ ••••••••••, ~ Kmsr "B" Roof Plan 1 L ' LeR Elevation Rlgh[ Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN I -"C" THE BUNGALOWS zss E Rincon Slreel Sle loo A T R O U T E 6 6 dd Corona Cal~fornie 92879 IJ70 (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909 ]JA 9454 SUBTTAl16567 DRC2003.01036 I°'°'`'"~Ar'°""' 1 Rancho Cucamon ge, California "C" Raof Plan Dnve Elevation A-28 KT6m,a-1l aim [roT fMLIL dww q fyy j- 353 E Rlncon Street Ste 100 I Corona, Cell forme 93979 IJJO klm W (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) 778-9454 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN2 THE BUNGALOWS A T R O U T E 6 6 ,~ aUBTTA16567 DRC3003.01036 Rancho C u c e ~n g a, C a l i f o r n i a Key Notes. OI weerL TNr Na! O2 IyY Imo. sem rlwy OJ s.errasw®...rmne IO w» m. O MmIOSb © LIMNINYSm Vam O ena vse O wud MkTYn O L~v~M SNUkn 10 SNgk Sryk Stllq I I Ilvnmwl SIJq 13 wmelwxw.. IJ wmo N..a.a 11 Wm14Nq IS iwm reacwi. 16 wn.lsnkort c.~.m I© wmev,ea IB c.ew eel r.e. w.v 19 r.i+.rc e.eia W..4 rem A-29 r ~ as tloi ` K mu Poan 2 Elevatan A -Ranch Plan 2 Elevatron B - Arnencana Plan 2 Elevatron C -Craftsman ~ ! i w.._._~ __~.. MlL ,l u_ ~~ M. Bdrm. "°'~ raw r C) ' ' Cf -'-'--- __r_ 1__a_. r Laue ww w 9Arm ] M~~ I1\^I J ^; y dB _ral~ Sccond Floor Aree 1790sf Bdrm 4 ~~ 255 E Rincon Suecl, Sle 100 Corona, California 92879-1770 bAnt ~faon~l (909) 2]2-5100 FAX (909) ]JB-9454 x,~°;~~. CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 - 2458 s f THE BUNGALOWS A T R O U T E 6 6 SUB7Tsl16567 DRCZ003-01036 Rancho Cucamonga, California Bdrm S Miy Ootional Bedroom 5 C• M~ ODtionai Den A-30 KT6Y C.ROIIPr.a _ _ [MT fMLIL p„wM 1{, ]001 ('1 1 Y,~YM,L~r Left Elevation Rfght Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2-"A" THE BUNGALOWS I~ 253 E Rincon Strner sr~ ia9 A T R O U T E 6 6 Corona, Cnliforn ie 92879-1730 ~ (909) 2]2-StOO FAX (909) 738-9454 SUB7TA16567 DRC3003 01036 ;_ Rancho Cuea~nga, California Dnve Elevation A-31 KTdr.2ttd2~rmm~~ ~r crag r K ua~ "A" Roof Plen i ! r I Left Elevanon R1ght Elevanon CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2-"B" THE BUNGALOWS 235 E Rincon srr<"r, s1. 100 A T R O U T E 6 6 ae Corona Celi Pornie 928]9 1770 ~~ 1~ (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 739-9434 SUBTTN16367 DRC2003 01036 ,.~.„, Rancho Cucamonga, California "B" Roof Plan Dnve Elevanon A-32 [TOT 190Yril e",s4~ K f W `~ V ~~ LeR Elevation Rlght Elevation CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS PLAN 2-"C" THE BUNGALOWS r zss F a."`°" s""', srn '°° A T R O U T E 6 6 ae Corona, C,lifornn 92879-I J30 b~ (909) 272-5100 FAX (909) 778-9454 SUBTTi~16567 DRC2003-01036 Rancho Cuca~aga, California Dnve Elevation A•33 KT6Y r•:: CA1 ••••••••••' Y Kuu "C" Roof Plan Main Street at Ronte 66 DILC2OO3-01036 SIJBTT16567 M)ZVCh'TES ~;ommunity Meeting held January 14.2004 Notice. Meeting v<as noticed per attached letter invrtation which w Soinar~aitendees City's requrred Planntng Commission notification area (list attached). word_of- indi:ated that mey aid not receive the invrtahon and arrivted f ~ m o~~bto sign the mouth. We advised that all who wanted to~enhstsitr~~ els used for the mailing, all but sign-ur sheet. Upon crc ss-checking the stg¢' ar U.S. tv.+o o:'ihose wno said :1tey did not receive an mvitationbad been sent one by regal ,Mail (Invitailons vier<; mailed on December 22~.) Attendees: 1 Comrnuiity attendees per the attached sign-in sheet. 2, lohm Lawg Hanes a Tun Tines, Vicepresrdent b RY.onda Neely, Senior Project Manager c. Lrs~ Bass t'roject Manager d (§rerg I~oster, Dtrector of Land Acquisition 3 Term Crallow.ty, presrdent of The Galloway Group (Land Planner) 4 Dav_~ Knit, princrpal, and Charles Addington, Project Designer, of KTGY Croup. Inc. (~+_t'chitect) 5 Free Spaeth, '=7oject Manager, of Madole & Associates, Inc. (Civil Engineer) 6 Lchar~ f{-~rywiede, President of Archtterra Desrgn Group (Landscape Architect) preients~ticiti• ~ team. She I. B. C`Ieel welcomed the comwunity and introduced the Icing regae`tec that everyone sign in tf they bad trot already done so. II F \eely yrovided an entitlement history of the project including: a. pr~~•7 pus developer proposed affordable multi-family for rent housing; the comuaunity objected to this proposal b. :.ain; ~ is proposing single family attached and detached for sate housing; In re-ponse to prevrous meetings, support has been expressed by the day czre owner, the owner of Mobile Manor, and members oc Sege tnmunt~ to me north. Laing has incorporated the followurg coni'tunity requests: _. The project has been gated to vehtcular traffic to prevent through traffic from Foothill Blvd , . t. The northern project entry 'a'cs relocated to align wrth Malachute vs. Layton r,~, pedestrian access was maintained to facilitate access to commeacral uses on Foothill Blvd. ~ v. Single family detached homes were introduced along San Bemard:no Road as a buffer to existing resrdents to the north. v. A bloclc wall has been incorporated on the eastern and western ~~ ~I protect perimeters. c ,~ f~~rmal apphcahon was made to the Ctty m December 2003 ~l A ~ pring planning Commission hearing ie anticipated ~-~ ~\ ZO d ~V•9: UOOZ Z 4ad ~, power point Presentation a A power point presentation was provided Laing product including The i :'t Neely narrated slides depicting :hchards which is a similaz o°~ied non-pro housing pro~ja g -aroposed. A slide of a Laing sp for abused women & children was includ ~ific ~ i•. T. Galloway narrated slides of the sp PLOJ pTOp°~ including an aerial, the Master Plan, cross-sections of the architectural along Foothill 8c San Bernardino Rd., elevations and detazLS of the land plan. ly, Questions and Answers were then fielded. Following is a a ,71ESti;,ns from the cominumty >g res oases (not is order, suuun~iry of the key questions asked and Laing P hrased and but gr:uped into categories) Questions and answers are P~ are no- intended to be sword-for-word transcript: b' ~ a traft"ic si at Archibald ~.iesnon• `why can't Laing install g~ f _^ and San Bernardino Road?„ 11Zesl.onse: "The City determines the need for these types of improvements and will condition our project accordingly Laing will query the City sad respond to the entleman the uestion (Mr. Dou Pure ." Que:tion• "Why don't you put a break in the median in Foothill Boulevard so that people can make left-hand turns into our roject~" Res ~onse: "The City's traffic engineer has spacing requirements for these types of improvements. We will contact the City for their response and will provide the answer to Mr. Pure „ i C~u~stion• .,Piave you been in contact with the school district re their ability to accommodate our students?" 2e.~onse: "Yes. We received letters from both school districts - stating that they can accommodate our students. In addttton, Laing will be required to pay state-mandated school fees." Q~ eshon: "How are you going to prevent excessive pazking on San ~ponse. "All of our homes have an enclosed two-caz garage and we have exceeded the required guest Parking within our prolect. Also, we will be improving San Bernardino Road to its ultimate right-of--way. However, this is a public road and the City's public parking rules will 2 ~-~ S'a £C d :D~9t b00Z Z And u "Why can't we have both of Y u ss o Question main ac° osa1 had the Boulevard? The P~O~ Pr°p on Foothill." ~g between "Because there w°~d not be ~~ ~ Response: osal was for ~ ~'O ~~~' ~~' the P on a bus t a singl ~ ap~nents. Apartments wan £or a for-sale riate o i s appr p street for advertising. fk residential commttttity to have hvo convenient safe means of access.° access to ]me up our northern ' Question: t you move y "Why don , ~ R with Laytonm "That was our original design but we relocated it to its espo,~se: current location due to strong eommttnttY eoncem about vnth Layton which is a through entr y lining up our street " "Mow tall is the wall between Laing and the mobile Cuesuon; home ark?" a~ f `°Iypically eight feet or less composed of Response: ~ ` arden wall on top of a two foot retaining g height is exceeded for a short distance on both the "Do onse• "There are no shvctttres :sp .,ahnnal re2rStN a5 hi5t0 >, either state or (h~era~l, rha artlience Lked the project and appreciated the lower density of this proposal anc the fart rhat w. responded to their eazher concerns. amt the Planning Commte'ssion buffer and nas}• residents expressed a desire to app ha>_nng ui support. A-~ ~'~ roc 'd :a a. roooz z aad 3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 40 p.m Larry Henderson March 2, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 - JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12 74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots related to develop 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation faality, common area landscaping, within the Mixed Use Distnct of the Foothill Boulevard Distncts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardmo Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38, and 208-151-07, 14, and 23 thru 29 Related File Development Review DRC2003-01036, Development DistnctAmendment DRC2003-01037, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01035, and Histonc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to develop 18 single-family detached condominiums facing San Bemardmo Road, and 138 attached condominiums with common recreation faality, common area landscaping, on 12 74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use Distnct of the Foothill Boulevard Distncts located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardmo Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38, and 0208-151-07, 14, and 23 thru 29 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, Development Distnct Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01035, and Histonc Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 Background The Planning Commission reviewed aPre-Application Review DRC2003-00503 on June 11, 2003, and again on August 13, 2003 (Exhibit "A") A neighborhood meeting was conducted by the developer on January 14, 2004 Since then, the developer has been working closely with staff to address Commission and neighborhood concems Master Plan Pursuant to the City Regwrements for the Mixed Use Designation, the applicant has submitted a Master Plan which provides an illustrative Land Use Plan for the entire block and a conceptual design features and development standards for the speafic residential project that is proposed Subtect to the DRC recommendations, staff is supportive of the overall concepts and development standards as shown in the Master Plan Design Parameters As a mid block in-fill protect, this development has had a number of significant challenges The challenges include relating to the Foothill Boulevard Improvement regwrements on the south, while responding to the different surrounding land uses including single-family detached homes to the north, commercial to the east, and a mobile home community to the west The applicant has responded by using single-family detached units along the San Bernardino Road (north side) frontage and extensive landscape setbacks on the other three sides, in addition to providing multiple pedestnan connections to the Foothill Boulevard frontage for strong linkage to adjacent commeraal properties Access to the site is provided via gated driveways on Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardmo Road Also, the internal motor court design is reminiscent of the Route 66 Motor Courts histoncally found along Foothill Boulevard in the past The proposed development has incorporated all of the Citys recommended design cntena and, therefore, there are no outstanding major issues or policy questions identified herein DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16567 AND DRC2003-01039 -JOHN LAING HOMES March 2, 2004 • Page 2 Other noteworthy details include the following 1. Architecture It appears that the Commission's policy on 360-degree architecture has been adequately addressed, particularly on the most publiclyvisible units. 2 Total open space provided at 53 percent exceeds 45 percent required at this density 3 Landscaping appears adequate with a total of 588 trees proposed and 585 required Twenty percent of the trees are 24-inch or larger 4 Parking Because the applicant is providing a standard two-car garage per dwelling unit, there are five garage spaces provided above the minimum regwrement and, in addition, there are eight open parking spaces above the minimum regwrement The open parking spaces appears to be reasonably distnbuted throughout the developmentwith 33 spaces on the west side and 32 spaces on the east side There are 22 extra parking spaces above minimum Code regwrements Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues All mator issues were addressed subsequent to the previous Pre-Application Review conducted by the Planning Commission in 2003 Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee v~nll discuss the following secondary design issues Site Plan -The Committee should review the proposed building setbacks along the protect boundary, particularly in relation to the adtoining mobtle homes. The two-story multi-family bwldings propose setbacks varying from 19 9 feet (one third) to 29 9 feet (two thirds) The minimum setback regwred is 20 feet Note in the areas with 19 9 feet setback (which include pnvate patio areas), no trees are provided as a buffer At a minimum, staff would recommend a continuous buffer of the Podocarpus evergreen trees along the protect boundary 2 Motor Court -The Development Code regwres a minimum of 24 feet wide dnveway access for two-way traffic, whereas, only 20 feet is proposed in the "neck" The provision of the regwred 24-foot wide dnveway with vine pockets only is acceptable 3 Recreation Amenities -A total of five are required, however, the Development Code stipulates the Planning Commission shall determine the number and locations of multiple tot lots forthis size protect, whereas, the protect only has one, and the applicant has proposed the Rose Garden and Gazebo instead of an additional Tot Lot The amenities shown are well designed 4 Mailboxes -None are shown on plans for multi-family area The preferred option is a centralized mailbox within community bwlding Altemat~vely, gang mailboxes designed into architectural structures (e g ,trellis) maybe located throughout protect 5 Foothill Boulevard Landscaping -The following elements should be provided consistent with the Suburban Parkway design of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan ~~~ ~ J DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16567 AND DRC2003-01039 -JOHN LAING HOMES March 2, 2004 Page 3 In addition to London Plane trees, the informal tree clusters should include California Sycamore, and Purple Plum Rhus Lances is no longer the desired tree speaes m the parkway There should be greater meander m the public sidewalk, except where the nght-turn lane rs located This may necessitate sidewalk easement, slope changes andlor retairnng walls The intent was for the sidewalk to meander within a 16-foot parkway (not 13 feet as proposed) Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design Hnthout discussion 1 Xenscape pnnaples should be incorporated into landscape and imgation design 2 Air condrtiornng units located outside pnvate patios should be screened by shrubs 3 All stone veneer should extend below ground surface Design Review Committee Action Members Present Cnstme McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Lany Henderson The Committee recommended approval based on the applicant's response letter dated March 1, 2004, and vwth the additional following conditions The split rail wood fence be substituted vwth concrete rails All wood gates have metal frames as verbally indicate by the applicant • A-C~ ~~~ Neil G Surah (Gen Manager) Knights Inn 1225 W Beale Street Kingman, AZ 86401 February 9, 2004 To. The Plarmmg Commission Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Sub.. Proposed Tentative Tract 16567 Mani Street at Route 66 Honorable Commissioner(s) FEB ~ ~ 2004 CITY OF Rr1`1CH0 CUCA1110NGA n~ FEB 1'7 2004 nor. I am the US Cmzen and the resident of State of Anzona I own a Mixed used rental property m the city of Rancho Cucamonga at 9575 San Bernardino Road (parcel number 02 08 151050000) My property ~s a preschool and day care facility run by a pnvate California cmzen family members on a lease contract basis My property ~s m the neighborhood of the above-mentioned Tract No 16567 A pnvate development company, John Laing Homes, ~s planning to bwld and develop 156 single family homes on this tract which is about 13 02 acres of mixed-use land This developer has noticed property owner's w~thm the vic~mty of their protect regarding their proposal 1 received a letter and knew about this very nice proposal and also. I personally visited the developer's office to see the whole protect I was really impressed to see This protect There will be a very good outcome from this protect and I believe rt will be an asset to our Rancho Cucamonga community 1 strongly express my support as one of the neighborhood real estate property owners Thank you very much for cons~denng my opinion as one of the property owners m making your decision I wish good luck to every mdmdual party and department for the success of this beautiful protect If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 928 - 753 - 3881 S ely, Neil G Surati Main Street at Route 66 Rancho Cucamonga DRC200301036 SUBTT16567 March 22, 2004 BUILDING SOUARE FOOTAGE Bungalows: S_F. DU Total S.F. Plan 1 2,143 9 19,287 Plan 2 2,458 9 22,122 Total Bungalow S.F. 41,409 Motorcourts: 10-Plex Plan 1 1,355 2 2,710 Plan 2 1,364 2 2,728 Plan 3 1,360 2 2,720 Plan 4 1,334 2 2,668 Plan 5 1,681 2 3,362 14,188 x 9 buldings Total 10-Plex Sq Footage 127,692 12-Plex Plan 1 1,355 2 2,710 Plan 2 1,364 2 2,726 Plan 3 1,360 2 2,720 Plan 4 1,334 2 2,668 Plan 5 1,681 4 6,724 17,550 x 4 buildings Total 12-Plex Sq Footage 70,200 Total Motorcourt S.F. 197,gg2 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL S.F. 239,301 CLUBHOUSE S.F. 1,979 POOL BUILDING S.F. 650 I, ~ ~~5~ K Crty o/Rancho Cueamorpa Plannrng Dmsron laoe> anmso _ ~~~,`~`,li)ilU,~ 'v. ~ C,r , ~T 212003 .,,, r ~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM -,-~ (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink Use the tab key fo move Irom one line to the next Ime ) The purpose of this foram is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed ,project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances; and Guidelines; -the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. -It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Appkcabon Number /or the pro/ect to which this form pertains / G/~'7A7 ~~ /YQ G! ~tP~ S7 ~ ~~P/~•~,~lZedital ~`~ ro/0 ~ ; ~~rpi,f`'~ss~,afi~s„ r.~mGw.r.~'1.,~1±7in3~ Pro/ect Tdle Main Street ~ Route 66 ame & Address o/pro/ect owner(s) ee attached Name & Address of developer or protect sponsor W L Homes LLC dba John Lainq Homes 255E Rlncon Street, Suite 100 Corona, CA 92879-1330 Contact Person 8 Address Rhonda Neely -Protect Manager -John Laing Homes 255E Rlncon Street, Swte 100 Corona, CA 92879-1330 Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (d dl//erent from above) Lisa Bass -Protect Coordinator -John Laing Homes 255E Rincon Street, Suite 100 ~orona, CA 92879-1330 Telephone Number 909 272-5127 EnvironmentallnfoForrn -Route 66 Page 1 of 9 I~ ~ Created on 10/7 6/2003 11 49 AM INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt isthe responsibildy o/the applicant to ensure that the applicabon is complete at the hme o/submittal, City stall wdl not be evadable to perform work required to provide missing m/ormahon '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set o/color photographs that show representative views u o the site /rom the north, south, east and west, wows rn o and /rom the site /rom the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views o/ srgn~cant textures /rom the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) North of Foothill Blvd between Hellman and Archibald 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached 'S) Gross Site Area (arJsq ff ) 13 02 acres '8) Net Sde Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 12 74 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet rf necessary) Protect contemplates a Development District Amendment 8) Include a description of all permits whrch wdl be necessary from the Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to /ully implement the pro/ect Tentative Tract Map, Final Map, Grading & Improvement Plans, Bullding Permits 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the pro/ect including in/ormation on topography, sort stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trans and roads, drernage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (mcludmg age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs or sgmficant features described In addition, cite all sources o/m/ormahon (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, trefFc studies) Topographically, the property is essentially planar, sloping to the south at approx two percent grade Vegetation consists primarily of a moderate to heavy growth of annual grasses and weeds A few eucalyptus trees are present in the eastern and northern portions of the property Onslte earth materials and soils are suitable for placement as fill from a geotechnical perspectwe EnvironmentallnfoFOrm -Route 66 Page 2 of 9 /~ , ~ ~ ~ ; Created on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM Information indicated by an asterisk (') rs not required o/nonconstructron CUP's unless othenwse requested by stall No state or federally listed as endangered threatened or sensitwe speaes were encountered on the site and none are expected to occur based upon the degraded condition of the habitat No unique habitat were encounted on the site No wnsdictional Waters or Wetlands of the US or Califomia State Streambeds were identrfied on the site Eight structures were detected These structures were built from 1927 - 1954 and consist mainly of Spanish Colonial Revwal style single family residences There is also a Craftsman style single family residence as well as a venacular painted brick garage built in 1947 All structures appear to be m fair condition 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or h/stoncal aspects of the site Crte all sources of mformahon (books, published reports and oral h/story) The exisiting structures were evaluated for significance and determined non-eligible under CEQA for inclusion in the National or California Historic Registers, therefore, no mitigation is regwred or recommended The structures have been photo-documented by Brandman Associates 11) Descnbe any notse sources and thetr levels that now affect the stte (atroreR, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses The site is impacted by traffic on Foothill Blvd An accoustical study has been completed which requires 6'high noise barriers to protect certain exteriorlwinq areas 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail Th/s should provide an adequate descnptton of the sde m terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed protect Indicate rt there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development fo occur with each phase, and the anhctpated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) rt necessary The prolect consists of 18 single family detached bngalows and 138 single family attached motorcourt condos with common recreation facility, common area landscaping and Foothill Blvd improvements consistent with the Visual Improvement Plan Assuming prolect approval in January, 2004, we anticipate the grading phase to be completed by September, 2004 and the infrastructure improvements phase to be completed by December, 2004 We anticipate 13 bwlding/construction phases with models to be completed by June, 2005 First move-in's anticipated m May, 2005 (see attached phasing exhibit) EnvironmenfallnfoFOrm -Route 66 Page 3 of 9 ~ ~ ~` Created on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM 13) Descnbe the surroundmg properties, mcludmg m/ormat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroral, etc ), mtensrty of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) To the North - Single family detached residential neighborhood of single story homes meeting standard setbacks To the West -mobile home park neighborhood of approximately 90 residential units and two single family residences To the South (Foothill Blvd) Is Blockbuster Video and other compatible uses To the East - a day care facility, gas station and vacant field (See Arborist Report by Jim Borer and Cultural Resources Assessment by Brandman Associates) 14) Wdl the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character o/the surroundmg general area of the pro/ect~ The proposed protect will provide an infill development that is consistent with the scale and character of ~...J the surrounding area and provides a transition between commercial development to the south and single family residential development to the north The proposed pro)ect is consistent with the General Plan and implements the Foothill Corridor vision 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How will these noise levels af/ect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproo(ng are proposed Short-term noise -usual and customary construction activity Long-term noise -those associated with residential uses (See accoustical report by Mestre-Greve) '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees There is one tree on site that would meat consideration for boxing or relocation (see tree #55 in Arborist Report) and miscellaneous palm trees The oak would require a methodical boxing operating requiring 3-4 months of forward preparation and future viability is not guaranteed Do not recommend saving Palms are relocatabie, however, replacing said palms would be more practical and would come with a contractor's guarantee 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Protect designed to tie Into existing municipal infrastructure EnvironmenfallnfoFortn -Route 66 Page 4 of 9 ~ ~ 1 : 1~~ Createtl on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For /urther clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 . a Restdenbal (gaUday) 66.000 00 Peak use (gaway) 132.000 00 b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Peak use (gaUmiNac) ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer Nsepbc tanks are proposed, attach perco/shoo tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed md~cate expected dally sewage generehon (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For /urther clan(cabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Otstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUday) b CommeroraUlndustnal (gel/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdent~al units 156 Detac a (md~cate range of parcel saes, mmrmum lot sae and maximum lot s¢e Approximately 3880 sg ft to 4885 sg ft Attached (md~cate whether unds are rental or for sale units) . 138 For Sale Units 21) Anbctpated range o/sale prates and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $250.000 00 to $350.000 00 Renf(permonth) $ to $ 22) Specdy number o/ bedrooms by unit type Single family detached bungalows - 4 & 5 bedrooms Attached motorcourt townhomes - 2-4 bedrooms 23) Indicate anbapated household s¢e by umt type Single family detached = 4 2 persons • Townhomes = 3 5 persons EnvironmenfallnfoForm -Route 66 Page 5 of 9 ~-~ ~~ ~ Createtl on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM 24) Indicate the expected numbero/school children who will be residing wdhin the protect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary 93 b Junior High c Senior High 46 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commeroial, industrial or instduhonal uses • 26) Total floor area oI commeroial, industrial, or institutional uses by type 27) lnd~cate hours a/operation 28) 29) Numbero)employees Total Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift Provide breakdown of anticipatedlob c/asst(cations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) 30) '31) Estimation of the number o/workers to be hied that currently reside in the Gty For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) EnwronmentallnfoFortn -Route 66 Page 6 of 9 ~~ I !`~ Created on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, Flro, and Flood control agencies serving the pro/act been contacted to determine they ability to prowde adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please md~cate their response Yes Cucamonga County Water Distract operates water facddies in both Foothill Blvd and San Bernardino Rd which can prowde domestic water and fire supply In addition CCWD operates a sewer Ilne within Foothill Blvd which can serve this prolect The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates flood control facilities up to the intersection of Foothill Blvd and Hellman Ave which have the capacity to serve this prolect Direct run-off from this prolect will drain into Foothill Blvd 33) In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s include, but are not l~mded to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other Flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known No recognized environmental conditions observed in relation to the prolect site Various items studied are not considered recognized environmental conditions in accordance with ASTM- 1527-00 These items may possibly include asbestos-containing materials lead based paints PCB's photo developing materials, automotive repair-related chemicals anti-freeze "separator" drum storage container and drums, chemical storage trailers, tires, numerous vehicles, underground heating oil tank, septic systems, possible buried materials associated with existing soil piles 34) Will the proposed protect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limded to those examples listed above If yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans N/A (however, common pesticides may be used in normal course of landscaping) I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required /or adequate evaluation of this pro/act to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and in/ormabon presented are true and correct tot he best ofmy knowledge and bel~el I further understand that additional inlormation maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluahon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 1 G ' :d. ~ -Ci-~ Signatu2.~ ~ ~ '~'~+<' \ _~' Tdle 4'~1 C~.1. ~'iu^,~C i ~~-~-?1,~L~ L • EnvironmentallnfoForm -Route 66 Page 7 of 9 /y. _r Ins Created on 10/16/2003 11 49 AM BIOLOGICAL SURVEY ON AN APPROXIMATELY 13-ACRE PARCEL IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA Prcparcd (or John Latng Homes 255 East Rrncon Street, Sutte 100 Corona, Cahfornta 92879 Prepared by Tom Dodson & Assoctates 2150 N Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, Cahfotnta 92405 Mazch 2003 Certfica4on I hereby ~emty that the statements furnished herein and m the attached eahibrts present data and mtortnanon regmred for Ihts &ological Survey to the best of my ability, and the facts, statements and mformahon presented are true and correct to [he best of my F,nowledge and belief ~~~ ~,~~- Pamela M Wnght BIOLOGICAL SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS I METHODOLOGY I RESULTS I CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES ~ LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES TABLEI CNDDB OVERLAY ; FIGURE l REGIONAL MAP q FIGURE 2 VICINITY MAP ~ PHOTOS 1-2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 6 fL-011 Rancho Cuca redevelopment parcel 2001 wpd -I I- TOM DODSON d'C ASSOCIATES -~~ BIOLOGICAL SURVEY . INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The purpose of this report rs to assess the brologrcal resources and the potential impacts associated with the proposal to develop a 13-acre parcel in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardmo County, Cahfomra (Please refer to Ftgure ]s) The srte rs located generally m the central thud of the block west of Hellman Avenue and east of Kinsman Avenue and rs dtrectly bounded by San Bemardmo Road on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south (Please refer to Figure 2) The srte is found in an unsectioned portion of Township 1 South, Range 7 West, SBM as shown on the USGS - GuasL, 7 5 Minute Series Quadrangle The srte rs an refill parcel surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, a mobile home park tot he west and mixed commercial development to the south and east The result of the general biological survey was that no state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensrtrve specres were rdenttfied on the srte and none are expected to occur on the srte The srte rs not located within designated critical habitat for any federally listed species While no bird nests were encountered during the surveys, the State of Cahfomra prohrbrts the take of active bird nests Cleating and grabbing of the vegetation on the property should be conducted outside of the State identified breeding season of Febmary 15 through September 1 to prevent the take of an active bird nest Alternatively, the site would need to be evaluated by a qualified biologist to detennme if bads were nesting on the srte prior to initiation of ground disturbance There are a number of trees on the srte Removing or damaging trees may requue a pemut from the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga METHODOLOGY The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and literature references were examined to obtain uiformation on species occurrences m the project vicinity Pamela Wright conducted field surveys on Febmary 26, 2003 by walking the property Photos were taken tocharactenzehabitatcondrtrons Drsturbancecharactensticsandanmialspecieswere recorded RESULTS The protect srte consists of numerous parcels wrth diverse current land uses The ma~onty of the srte is characterized by disturbed, dense, nonnative grassland interspersed wrth ornamental landscaping specres Dominant specres include short-podded mustard (Hrrschjeldra rncana), several specres of Bromus, wild radish (Raphanus snnvus), common mallow (Malva neglrcta) and landscape omanientals including tamarisk (Tamarrx ramosrssrma), eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus sp ), nonnative yucca (Yucca sp ), nonnative prickly pear (Opunna sp) and elderberry (.S'ambucus mexrcnnus) The nonnative grassland contains well worn bike paths wrth dumps and prts m addition to fight littering The very southern portion of the srte are currently mixed uses including vehicles storage and assorted commercial wrth lots maintained as compacted dirt, concrete or mowed nonnative grasses The animal specres observed on the srte were Anna's Hummingbird (Calypte anna), American crow (('orvus hrachyrhynchos) and northern mockingbird (M~mus poly,~lottos) No state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive specres were encountered on the srte No unique or sensrtrve habitat was encountered on the srte A list of sensrtrve specres which occur wrthm [he USGS Guasti JL-Oil Rancho Nca rcdevelopmtnl panel 2003 wpd 'I - TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES ~~ W BIOLOGICAL SURVEY TopograplncQuadranglepertheCahfomtaNaturalDrversrtyDataBase(CNDDB)andadtscusstonofthetroccurrence potential is provided in Table 1 In summary, the dense, tall growth of the grassland effectively out competes and precludes native sensrtrve spectes from occumng on the project site The inhospitable habitat ofthe site, combined with the biologically isolated nature of the site and the continuing disturbance create circumstances where tt is exceedingly unhkelxtthat sensitive spectes documented from the Guastr Quadrangle could occur on the site Table 1 CNDDB Occurrence Overlay for Guastt USGS Too a htc Q d I ua ran e Scientific Common Status Name Name Federal/State TYPical Habitat Occurrence Potential Navarreha prostrate none / S2 1'> Grows on alkaline sods to The site is heavily disturbed, prostrata navarretia grassland or vernal pools and no sortable habitat for between 15 and 700 meters Ihrs spectes occurs on the project site Therefore n rs very unlikely that this species could occur on the site Perognathus Los Angeles none/ spectes Inhabits open ground with fine Moderately sortable habitat longrmembns pocket mouse of concern sandy sods m low elevation occurs m the portions of the brewnasus grasslands and coastal sage site vegetated by coastal sage comnmmttes m the Los Angeles scmb and early successional basin May not dig e~tensrve chaparral No sortable burrows, hiding under weeds habitat occurs on the portion and dead leaves instead of the site proposed for development Phrynosoma San Diego none /spectes hiltabrts Enable, rocky, or The site is heavily drsturbed coronatum homed lizard of concern shallow sandy sods m coastal and no sortable habitat for hlarnvrller sage scmb and chaparral this specres occurs on the Requires open areas for sunning project site Therefore n is and is most frequent m sparsely unlikely [hat this specres vegetated washes could occur on the site Rhaphromrdas Delhi Sands endangered / Thts spectes only occurs m Accordutg to Figure 6 termrnatus flower-loving none areas of the Delhi Sands Ontano Recover Unrt of the abdomrnalrs fly fOlTilatlOn m southwestern San USFWS Final Recovery Plan Bernardino & northwestern for the Delhi Sands Flog+er- Rtverstde Counties It regwres loving Fly, no Delhi Sands fine, sandy soils on wholly or formation occurs on the partly consolidated dunes and project site or trnntedrate sparse vegetation vtctmty No sortable habitat occurs on the project site, mid therefore this spectes will not occur on the site 1L-U31 RancLo Cuca redevelopment parcrl 2003 wpd -2- TOM DOD90N ~S ASSOCIATES R-C~ ~t BIOLOGICAL SURVEY Coding and Terms Federal Species of Concem "taxa for which the U S Fish and Wddhfe Service has information that mdtcates proposing to list the taaa as endangered or threatened is possibly appropriate, but for which substaitttal data on the biological vulnerability and threats are not currently known or on file to support the immediate preparation of rules " (Arnold) All of these species have a limited range In fact, some species are lumted to the San Bernardino Mountains area, however, they are locally common State Species of Special Concem An administrative designation given to vertebrate species that appear to be vulnerable to extinction because of decbnmg populations, limited acreages, and/or continuing threats * Raptor and owls are protected under section 3502 i of the Cahforn~a Fish and Game code "It ~s unlawful to take, posses or destroy any birds m the orders Falcomfornies or Stng~fomtes or to take, possess or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird " State Plant Rankings S 1 -less than 6 element occurrences, or less than 1,000 individuals, or less than 2,000 acres S2 - 6 to 20 element occurrences, or between 1,000 and 3,000 individuals, or between 2,000 and 10,000 acres S3 - 21 to 100 element occurrences, or between 3,000 and 10,000 mdrv~duals, or between 10,000 and 50,000 acres S4 - No Threat Rank SS - No Threat Rank R-E-D Code 1 -very threatened 2 -threatened 3 - no current threats known CONCLUSIONS No state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or sensitive species were encountered on the site and none are expected to occur based upon the degraded condmon of the habitat No unique habitat was encountered on the site No~unsdict~onal Waters or Wetlands of the United States or California State Streambed were identified on the site While no bird nests were encountered during the surveys, the State of Cahfomia Fish and Ganie Codes 3503 and 3503 5 proh~bu the take of active bird nests (please refer to references for a full citation) Clearing and grubbing of the vegetation on the property should be conducted outside of the State identified breeding season of February IS through September 1 to prevent the take of an active buds nest Alternatively, the site would need to be evaluated by a qualified biologist to detenrune tf buds were nesting on the site prior to mnianon of ground disturbance The project proponent ~s hereby informed that m the unlikely event that a fisted species ~s observed within the constrnct~on areas prior to or during grading/construction, that the loss of any listed species is considered an illegal take under both state and federal law IL-U31 kaflL~lU Cuw rcdevelopmem parcel ?OOl wpd -3- 1^r TOM DtODSON b'C ASSOCIATES -~ 11 FIGURE 1 Regional Map I~ - ~ i~ 1 r 1 ~ - _ _ _ _. _ .., ~ ;, , 71.~~ 4~ 1/~/ „~ _-_ l~ - Il ~ 2= '- ~ ~ --"~ ~ . ~~:,~ - ; - - - x~a _~A ~~ l i/~~/ - _ 'ivy n _ _ a , SITE I~ • I Source DeLorme TopoQuads I Tom Dodson 8 Associates Q /, Environmental Consultants ~r~ \~ ~~ Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants SITE PHOTOGRAPHS TOM DODSON 8 ASSOCIATES FIGURE 3 Environmental Consultants LJ 1~ BIOLOGICAL SURVEY . References Burt, William H and Richard P Grossenherder 1980 Peterson Field Gwdes Afield gwde to the Mammal North Antenca north of Mewco, thud edition Houghton Mifflin Company, New York s CalFlom InfonnatrononCahfomraplantsforeducation,researchandconservatron [webapphcation] 2000 Berkeley, Cahfomra The CalFlora Database [a non-profit organization] Available httn //www calflora org Cahfomra Natural Drversrty Data Base (NDDB) 2002 Annotated record search for special animals, plants and natural con>rrrunrtres Natural Hentage Drvrswn, Sacramento, Cahfomra Emrnel, Thomas C and John F Emmel 1973 The Butterflies of Southern Cahfomra Science Senes 26 Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Munz, P A 1974 A flora of Southern Cahfonua University of Cahfomra Press, Berkeley, Cahfomra Natrona) Geographic Socrery 1999 Field gwde to the bads of North Amenca, thud edmon Natrona) Geographic Society, Washington, D C Osborne, Kendall H 2001 Focused survey for the Deihr Sands Grant Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphromrdas termtnarus abdomrnalrs) on the 32 acre site on the west end of the Jurupa Mountains Unpublished survey report Stebbins, Robert C 1985 Afield gwde to western reptiles and amphibians Peterson Field Gwdes Houghton • Mifflin Company, Boston United States Frsh and Wddhfe Servrce 2000 Final Detennmation of Cntical Habitat for the Coastal Cahfomra Gnatcatcher, Final Rule 65 FR 63679 63743 United States Frsh and Wddhfe Servrce 1997 Delltr Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphromrdas [ermrnatus abdomrnahs) Recovery Plan United States Frsh and Wildlife Servce. Portland, OR Untied States Frsh and Wddhfe Sernce 1993 Deterntrnation of Threatened Status for the Coastal Cahfomra Gnatcatcher 58 FR 16742 16757 United States Frsh and Wddhfe Servrce 1993 Determination of Endangered Status for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fh 58 FR 49881 49887 Cahfomra Frsh and Game Code 3503 and 3103 5 read as follows 3503• It rs unlawful [o take, possess or needlessly des troy [he nest or eggs ofany hrrd except as otherwise provided by [his code or any regulation made pursuant [hereto 3503 5: It rs unlawful [o take, possess, or destroy any hrrds rn [he orders Falconrformes or S'trrgrformes (hrrds-of--prey) or to take, possess, or des troy the ties[ or e,~,Gs ofany such hrrd except as olherwrs e provided by this code ar anv ret;ulntmn adopted pursuant thereto r1 LJ rL-Oil Ramho tuu rcdivelopment parttl2UUi wpd -7- /{-~/~ TOM DODSON B. ASSOCIATES `~ City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, and Development Review DRC2003-01036 2. Related Files: Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01035 3. Description of Project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to change the zone from Community Commeraal to Mixed Use fora 7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located north of Foothill Boulevard, between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-151- 20 thru 23 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to subdivide 12 74 net acres of land into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots related to develop 18single-family detached condommwms and 138 attached condomwums with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping within the Mixed Use Distract (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES - A request to master plan and develop 18 single-family detached condominiums fronting San Bernardino Road and 138 attached condominwms with common recreation facilities and common area landscaping on 12 74 net acres of land within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: WL Homes, LLC dba John Laing Homes 255 East Rincon Street Suite 100 Carona, California 92879-1330 Attention Rhonda Neely 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use/Community Commercial 6 Zoning: Mixed Use/Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 3) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The 12 74-acre site contains eight structures each built between 1927 and 1954 Seven of the structures are bwlt in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, and one residence is constructed in the • Craftsman style A vanety of trees exist throughout the property, with remaining vegetation comprising moderate to heavy growth of grasses and weeds North of the protect site is a single- family residential neighborhood and south, on Foothill Boulevard, are commercial businesses ~~ ~p Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT 16567 Page 2 East of the proposed development are two childcare facilities, gas station, small strip commercial center, and vacant land To the west is a 90-unit mobtlehome park and two single-family homes 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Piannmg Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750n, Ext 4303 10. Other agencies whose approval Is required (e g ,permits, financing approval, ors participation agreement) • Regional Water Quality Control Board -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) Discharge Permit • City of Rancho Cucamonga - Gradmg and Buildmg Permits GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report EIR - Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o - Fme Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS2002 -Urban Emissions Model R- ~-'~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation incorporated," or °Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Qualty (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology/Soils Q Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology and Water Quality (/) Land Use/Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Population/Housing (/) Public Services ()Recreation (/) Transportationlfraffic ()Utilities/Service Systems (/) Mandatory Findings of Signrficance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a 'Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that ar i posed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared By Date 7 Reviewed By Date ~\~ IL' u Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmeneelly Less Then signmcen, Less Tnen Sgnifiran, I ecl eh Lkegaaon Into rated Sipiufiean, I No 1 1. AESTHETICS Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantlally damage scemc resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantlally degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () () (/) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a-c) The protect site is located within Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, which requires specific landscape, architectural, and aesthetic standards to meet the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and Development Code The protect's design would be compatible with City standards for the Foothill Boulevard Districts and would incorporate streetscape, building, and landscape elements to provide an overall positive identity for the area in conformance with City obtectives No scenic highways exist within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Upon design review approval, visual quality of the area would not degrade as a result of the protect No impact on aesthetics is expected d) All lighting, including security and street lighting, would be installed in accordance with Development Code standards as specified in the Foothill Boulevard Districts design standards All lighting elements of the protect would be approved by the City Planner No impact is expected from light or glare Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Less Then Signifisen, Leas Tnen S,gnihcen, ah Mitigation Signditant No I C Inco rated 1 act I act 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a/c) The site is not designated Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland ~-~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003.01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southem and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from three acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The sde is within the southem section of the City and was once used for agricultural purposes. Currently, much of the land wthin this area of the City is undergoing residential or commercial development and is characterized by existing and planned industrial, residential, and commercial land uses The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Additionally, there are no W illiamson Act contracts within the City Issues and Supporting Information Sources amam~enr ~~m~ Significnm ~ ,nen Sign,ICent I nh MNge-on Ingo ratatl Sigrchcant I No I ed 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () (/) () ( ) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (/) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () (/) ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a-c) The proposed residential development would contribute to pollutant levels within the area The South Coast Air Basin is currently in non-attainment status for Ozone (03) and Particulate Matter (PM,o) The addition of pollutants is an unavoidable significant impact for which the City has adopted a statement of overriding considerations In addition, the City implements mitigation measures as standard conditions of approval to control emissions using the best available control methods to reduce significant impacts from pollutants both during the construction and post-construction phases of a protect The residential development includes the construction of 18 detached single-family condominiums and 138 attached condominiums on 12 74 acres of land New development would add to pollutant levels in the area during construction and post-construction phases The criteria pollutants screened for using the URBEMIS 2002 model included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates ~-C,~b fmtial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 6 (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursors Air quality impacts caused during prolect development are discussed below m the Construction Emissions section, and long-term impacts are discussed in the Operations Emissions section The emission levels listed in Tables 1 and 2 reflect the estimated summer season levels, which are greater during the summer months than the winter months wilhm the South Coast Air Basin Construction Emissions Generally, during the grading phase of construction, fugitive dust (PM,o) would be generated and the site could exceed SCAOMD thresholds for PM,o and NOX The prolect site lies north of a large commercial development containing many different business types, and south of single-family homes The eastern portion of the prolect site borders a pre- school and the western boundary is next to a mobile home park The proposed prolect has been tentatively phased by the applicant to last an estimated 35 months, starting m July of 2004 and finishing in May of 2007 Infrastructure would be completed m a single phase (Phase I) and then housing units would be built in thirteen subsequent phases m groupings of 10 to 18 units per phase Table 1 depicts the calculated levels of emissions expected during each year of construction Table 1 Estimated Daily Emissions For Each Construction Year (2004-2007) • Pollutant Threshold of Significance Construction Year 2004 Construction Year 2005 Construction Year 2006 Construction Year 2007 Significant (Any Year) ROG's 75 12 65 12 60 9 68 68 35 No NO, 100 98 79 94 91 73 71 21 No CO 550 90 14 92 54 71 40 4 50 No PM,o 150 13 81 4 35 3 45 07 No As shown, construction emissions remain at, or below, levels established for construction actmties Settings within the URBEMIS model were modified to reflect actual egwpment to be used on-site and the realistic operational timeframes of the egwpment The emission estimates listed include mitigation measures used for the control of PM,o, NOx, CO, and ROG's Since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone (03) and suspended particulates (PM,o), and to control fugitive dust during construction actmties, potentially significant impacts would be mitigated by implementation of the following measures 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distract and Regional Water Duality Control Board) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 2) Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • ~~~ ~\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 7 3) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) or vegetative • ground covers shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 4) Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at 16 m.p.h. or below at all times. 6) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that there use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air f]uality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as Clty Planning Staff. 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD . Rule 1108. 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule actnrities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 m p.h.) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24mch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel • powered equipment where feasible. -~ ~~ Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 8 • 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures would decrease, to the extent feasible, construction emissions associated with grading, equpment exhaust, and exposed soil surtaces Operational Emissions The malonty of the site is a vacant field covered in grasses Small residences or individual commercial businesses occupy the frontage portion of the property The sde lies withrn Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Distract South of the property is a large commercaal development and north of the proposed site are single-family neighborhoods Once completed, the site would contain 18 smgie-family detached condominwms, and 138 attached condommwms The primary pollutant sources for the residential development would be vehicle exhaust and natural gas combustion Table 2 shows operational emissions attributable to dwelling units on-site Table 2 URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) • Source ROG NO, CO PM Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source Mobile Source 7 84 13 42 784 13 42 1 27 12 04 1 27 12 04 134 143 67 134 143 67 0 00 9 53 0 00 9 53 Totals SCAOMD Thres Si nificance 21 26 55 No 21 26 55 No 13 31 55 No 13 31 55 No 145 01 550 No 145 01 550 No 9 53 150 No 9 53 150 No Emission data estimates show that operational pollutant levels would remain below thresholds established by the SCAOMD and would not violate or contribute substantially to any air quality violation As noted in the City's General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed federal and state standards Mitigation measures included to control emissions during construction and adherence to City standard conditions of approval for energy efficiency (listed below) would result in less than significant impacts on air quality within the protect area 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, chid care centers, and athletic /~_~~5 Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pace 9 facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts rf they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site borders a mobile home park, and single-family residences, and the western edge of Pacific Coast Pre-school The above tables show that pollutants would not exceed established thresholds during construction or post-construction of the proposed protect Mobile emissions of the proposed residential development would minimally add to existing pollutant levels at concentrations substantially below currently allowable thresholds Pollutant concentrations on sensitive receptors would be less than signrficant e) Typically, residential developments do not create obtectionable odors No impacts are expected Issues and Supporting Information Sources vmemuur ~~ s,cn,fi=an+ ~ loan $ipiuficant I ,M ALa9aEOn Into lea Spruannt I ^ No 1 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (/) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in Iccal or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological Interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () (/) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) According to Exhibit IV-3, Sensitive 8lological Resources, within the City's General Plan, the protect site is not located within or near a biological resource area In March 2003, Tom Dodson and Associates pertormed a biological assessment of the site to determine if endangered, rare, or threatened species occur on-site • ~~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 10 The matority of the site is characterized by disturbed, dense, non-native grassland interspersed wdh ornamental landscaping species The non-native grassland contains well-worn bike paths with lumps and pits in addition to light littering No State or federally listed endangered, threatened or sensitve species were encountered on-site and no unique or sensitwe habitat was encountered on-site The existing conditions on-site including dense, tall grassland that preclude native sensitive speces from occurring on the protect site The site is biologically isolated creating a circumstance where rt is exceedingly unlikely that sensitive species would occur on-site Whde no bvd nests were encountered during the biologist's site survey, the following mitigation measure would protect birds potentially nesting on-site 1) Prior to clearing and grubbing activities, a qualified biologist shall examine the property to determine if birds are nesting on the site prior to initiation of ground disturbance. b-d) The site is characterized by dense, tall growths of grasses, which out compete native species from occurring on-site No turisdictional Waters or Wetlands of the United States or California State Streambeds were identified on-site The site is considered biologically isolated and would not support use as a migration corridor e) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has instituted a Tree Ordinance to protect "heritage" trees such as eucalyptus, palm, oak, sycamore, pine, and others to preserve the scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution An Arborist Report prepared in June 2003, by Jim Borer identified a total of 67 heritage trees with trunk diameters of 15 niches or larger at a point 4 5 feet above the soil level on- site The avocado tree #68 does not meet the City's Tree Ordinance criteria of a heritage tree because all fruit and nut bearing trees are exempt Furthermore, of the 67 trees only one heritage tree deserves special attention, a Coast Live Oak The Coast Live Oak is in typical condition for its type and maturity and has a good long- term disposition in its present condition on-site The Coast Live Oak is the only tree on-site that would merit consideration for preservation The arbonst concluded that this tree could be preserved in place by designating a preservation zone of non-disturbance at least as wide as drip line, however, the proposed development plans would regwre removal or relocation of tree due to conflicts with grading and improvements The arbonst indicated that there is a high level of expectation for long-term survival if the this Coast Live Oak tree were relocated under the supervision of a qualified and experienced contractor, as well as, the use of side boxing and tunneling methods Persistent attention to maintenance during construction and after re-planting would be critical to ensure long-term survival The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 2) The Coast Live Oak tree shall be moved or replaced in kind with mature specimen in a location to be determined by City Planner. Other trees on-site do not represent valuable resources Eucalyptus trees occurring on-site were generally declining and already represent a hazard for failure or collapse Palm trees could be saved, although, due to their small size, it would be more cost effective to plant other palms at the time of site landscaping The various other specimens of tree are no longer used in ornamental landscaping because of surtace rooting, growth forms, and early maturity decline The protect design includes extensive landscaping, including a minimum of 45 trees per acre of which at least 10 percent shall be 36-inch box size f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan Exhibit IV-4, Open Space and Conservation Plan, or Exhibit IV-3, Sensitive Biological Resources No conflicts with habitat conservation plans would occur ~~ 8r Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources I'~IgM~any Legg Than sanln~am Lags Than SipnlficaM ch Migpegon Sipn,hcant No I Intro ngtetl 1 an 1 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () (/) () ( ) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a-c) In March of 2003, Michael Brandman Associates evaluated the proposed residential development site for cultural resources in March of 2003 The report involved a cultural resource record search, transect survey, examination of aerial photographs, evaluation of the eight on-site structures, and a paleontological resource records review in accordance with Section 15064 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) A paleontological records search was conducted on March 18, 2003, by the San Bemardino County Museum The records search revealed that previous geologic mapping of the area showed a stratum of well-dissected Pleistocene fan deposits known to have a high potential for fossil resources The site visit and aerial photograph review showed that the entirety of the protect site has been utilized for agricultural purposes in the past and currently contains single-family residences Given the disturbances associated with past land use it is unlikely that fossil resources would have survived to the present day The report concluded that the potential for impacts to any existing fossil resources was minimal The archaeological records search was pertormed by Archaeological Information Center (AIC) at the San Bernardino County Museum on March 4, 2003 The AIC examined current lists of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR), Califomia Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) The AIC also reviewed the most current Califomia State Historic Resources Inventory (CHRI) for San Bemardino County to determine local resources previously evaluated for historic significance, and archival maps The search indicated that the protect area has never been surveyed, but several historical properties were identified occurring within aone-half mile radius of the study area The site survey revealed the presence of one previously recorded cultural resource, the Santolucito House at 9474 Foothill Boulevard, and seven unrecorded structures more than 45 years old, all of which are located on-site Of the eight homes, those located at 9424, 9434, 9456, 9474, 9482, 9494 Foothill Boulevard are potentially eligible for local listing as part of a historic district due to the association with a locally important family and the local agricultural industry The house at 9494 appears to be the most significant structure from an architectural and relocation feasibility standpoint and therefore an appropriate mitigation is provided However, the eight identified structures within the study area do not qualify for National or California Registers and are not considered significant under CEQA cultural resource criteria The City is considering designation of these eight structures as a Historic Point of Interest concurrently with this protect since the eight structures do not make a strong enough physical presence to constitute a historic district However the association to an ~J~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 12 important family and local agricultural past will be adequately preserved as a Historic Point of Interest and will include adequate signs and plaques on site to assure the historical information is not lost No additional cultural resources are known to occur wdhin the prolect area However, should cultural resources be unearthed during earthmoving activities the following mdigation measures would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level 1) Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard: The developer shall offer the structure(s) to the public, for relocation or salvage, for a period of thirty days prior to demolition. 2) Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified structures to the City Planner. Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed prior to the first occupancy. 3) If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered during earthmoving activities, earthmoving shall be stopped and uncovered resources shall be tested for historical significance under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Criterion A, B, C, and D prior to continued impact. 4) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho • Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) No significant religious or sacred uses occur on-site According to records used to identify the potential for cultural resources no burial grounds or cemeteries were located on the prolect site To avoid impacts to potential buried remains the following mitigation measure would ensure a less than significant impact . 5) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin r \-~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~lY h~m~ s~.r,~n ~ ~ $ipmhcant I Rh ALhpebM Into etl $iprnfiwtl 1 No I 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alqulst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O (/) ( ) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction Iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result In on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 16-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments- a) The site is not located within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone for fault-rupture hazard as defined by the Alqulst-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act or within a Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Designated fault hazard zone The site lies one-mile southeast of an uncertain segment of the Red HIII Fault Subsurtace investigations have found no evidence of its existence, nor any evidence of near surface faulting Surtace rupture would not impact the site The site is located in a seismically active area, as is the case throughout Southern California The two faults located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which could directly affect the site, are the Red Hill Fault and the Cucamonga Fault Other regional faults could produce shaking that could be felt at the site, but are not located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga r1 LJ • ~'~~O Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 14 • The Red Hill fault is a thrust fault approximately 15 5 miles in length Probable magnitudes on the fault segment range between 6 and 7 moment magnitude (M„,) The eastern end of the fault is believed to be more active than its western end, and possibly more related to the Cucamonga Fault rather than a part of the Red Hill Fault Based on subsurtace explorations of the Red Hill Fault, its existence has not been identified near the site The Cucamonga Fault is the most prominent seismic source in the vicinity of the site, located about four miles north of the site at tts nearest point This thrust fault is the primary fault along the southern front of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains separating the crystalline bedrock of the San Gabriel mountains from the valley alluvwm. Earthquakes as large as 7 0 M„, are believed to be possible along segments of the Cucamonga Fautt Ground rupture during a major event on this fault has been estimated at 6 5 feet To avoid signficant adverse impacts associated with ground shaking, the applicant would be required to adhere to the Caldomia Bwlding Code and the recommendations presented in the Geotechnical report, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed 200 Unit Townhouses W/o Klusman RD E/o Hellman Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, prepared for the site by RMA Group on March 6, 2003 Groundwater was not encountered during subsurtace exploration and was recorded at 550 feet below the surtace The potential for liquefaction is considered low due to the depth to groundwater and compaction of near surtace soils The two percent surtace gradient should preclude the site from the potential for landslides or mudflows No impact is expected from liquefaction or landslides b) The site is located on a broad, coalescing alluvial tan that emanates from the San Gabnel Mountains to the north subsurtace investigation revealed the site is mantled with a thin layer of loosed to medum dense brown silty sand that grades to yellowish-brown, medium dense to dense silty sand At depth, dense sand and gravelly sands with cobbles are present These soils lack sufficient amounts of clays to act as a binder and when disturbed by grading, excavation, or fill activities can become loosened and subject to erosion To comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the contractor must form a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) for post- construction management of stone water run-off, to avoid sedimentation off-site Stone water quality management must be considered during a project's planning phase, implemented dunng construction, and ultimately maintained for the life of the project Improperly managed run-off can be a significant source of water pollution causing impacts to aquatic habitat, wildlife, and water-dependent beneficial uses WOMP's are developed as required under State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) order number R6- 2002-0012 and NPDES number CAS616036 Each storm water quality plan will incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system The prolect proponent would be required to submit, for agency approval, a proposal identifying the BMPs, or pollution control measures, that would be incorporated into the project to control discharges into the storm water system A WOMP has been formed for the proposed John Laing Homes prolect, which identifies BMPs for the post-construction management of storm water run-off The following mitigation measures would be regwred to control storm water effluent 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to City Officials for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. -~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 15 2) Ail disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion c) Alluvium at the site has been recorded at approximately 1,000 to 1,100 feet thick and rests on a basement of granitic bedrock The density of underlying material and compaction of near surface sods would protect the site from impacts associated with an unstable geologic unit d) The site is mostly vacant, with tall, dense grasses covering the open areas Single-family residences occupy the southern property boundary and a portion of the south-central area is used for storing and parking of cars In the past the sde was used for citrus production and as a nursery According to expansion tests performed on soil samples taken from the site, the expansion classification is very low No impact is expected from expansive soils e) The protect would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed Issues and Supporting Information Sources PdenaNlT Lw Than sanM1~m Lals T~+ SPM1M1Cam I ~M1 AL9pa0on Into ed $ip,uM1Cent I No I 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident considerations involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O O (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan • ~J ~-~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 16 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a-b) The proposed protect would not be expected to be associated with the release, creation, or exposure of persons to hazardous substances A Phase I and limited Phase II site assessment was performed by Petra Geotechnical Inc for the site, which concluded that no recognized environmental conditions were observed, and based on soil analytical data, no soil removal was warranted In addition, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared for the site to ensure typical pollutants associated with the residential development would not impact adjacent water ways, or release pollutants beyond protect boundaries Implementation of drain inserts, resident education programs, and effiaent trngation would be used to control miscellaneous release of oil and grease, organic compounds, and pesticides No impact is expected due to the release or creation of health hazards related to the residential development c) The prolect site is located next to and west of the Pacific Coast Pre-school An elementary school is located 25 miles east of the prolect site A junior high school is located .52 miles north of the prolect site The prolect would not handle, or emit hazardous materials, substances or wastes No impact from hazardous wastes is expected on local schools d) The prolect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site The database search o~ pertinent federal, state, and local regulatory agency data did not reveal the presence of an unmitigated hazardous waste site During the Phase I site assessment, a gasoline spill was recorded, and remediation was performed to effectively remove the identified contamination The site would not pose a significant hazard to the public e-f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan, is not within two miles of a public airport, and uss not in the wanrty of a public airstrip No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster City Staff would review site plans to ensure the proposed prolect does not interfere with evacuation or emergency response Approval by the City's engineering and planning departments would ensure no impact from the prolect h) According to General Plan Exhibit V-7, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area According to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban W ildland Interface area found m the northern part of the City The prolect site currently contains tall, dense grasses on-site The initiation of construction would result in substantial grading actmties, leaving the site devoid of flammable vegetation Upon construction completion, the site would contain landscape elements consisting of natural vegetation and a program for maintenance of the site instituted through a Home Owners Assoaation No impact is expected due to flammable vegetation L ~~~ ~~ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 17 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ra~~lY laaa 7lun ~~~++ I..< .n>,~ Sipe/icant I M MroO~an trico e0 9ptrfieam I No I 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficd in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () (/) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the () () (/) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () (/) ( ) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () (/) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments. a/f) A Phase I Site Assessment was conducted for the site The report concluded that no recognized environmental conditions as defined by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) were identified Although no existing conditions were found, the site would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WpMP) to protect off- site water quality by controlling storm water discharges from the proposed residential site Pollutants associated with activities of tenants may include trash and debris, oil and grease, pesticides, or nutrients and sediments from landscaped areas Source control Best Management Practices (BMPs) chosen for the John Laing Homes development include site design to allow storm water percolation through pervious surtaces before water can migrate off-site, efficient irrigation to avoid over-watering, and stenciling of storm drains to inform ~-~ q2 Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 • residents that run-off drains into a watershed Additional BMPs to be implemented at the site would be media filters and dram inserts to remove gross pollutants such as trash, debns, sediments, particulates and hydrocarbons Implementation of suggested BMPs would minimize impacts on water quality to less than signficant b) Accordmg to Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water m the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 Accordmg to General Plan Exhibit IV-2, the proposed protect would not deplete groundwater supplies, nor would it intertere wdh recharge because it would not be within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground CCWD has plans to meet the increased need through the construction of future water faalities. The protect sde does not lie within an area used for groundwater recharge Groundwater basins within Rancho Cucamonga are replenished by natural precipitation, and through a number of spreading grounds and percolation srtes Groundwater pumping is also limited by a 1958 Superior Court tudgment, which limrted the extractable amount to less than the sustainable yield No impact on groundwater supplies is expected c-d) All runoff would be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The proposed protect would not alter the course of a river or stream, but would impact the current drainage pattern by use of pervious surtaces for parking, sidewalks, and common use areas such as pool grounds or play grounds To avoid siltation or flooding off-site the protect proponent has prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which would incorporate efficient design into the protect to retain sizable amounts of pervious areas such as recreation areas and vegetated slopes to allow infiltration dunng stone events The City Engineer must approve a grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of grading permits Adherence to the WQMP would ensure that impacts from stltation and flooding are less than significant e) The site would dram into the Cucamonga Creek channel The Cucamonga Creek channel has undergone significant flood control improvements such as concrete lining in order to handle significant storm water flows Run-off from the proposed development would be conveyed within pnvate streets, catch basins, and parkway culverts, which would then be duected into public storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue to a final destination of the Cucamonga Creek channel A WQMP was formulated for the site to control the addition of potential pollutants into the storm dram system Measures such as media filters and drain inserts would be used to remove trash, debns, sediments, and particulates from site run-off, combined wdh storm drain signage and site design Implementation of WQMP measures would ensure impacts to water quality are less than signfcant g-t) According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the site does not lie within a 100-year flood zone The site does not lie near any dams or levees No standing bodies of water exist near the site eliminating the risk of tsunami or seiche r 1 LJ ~-cam ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 19 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa~bmy ~~~ *~ Sipn~fira,t I fift Abbpeban IrKO eE $,prufiunt I No I 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically diwde an established community O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () (/) () regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the protect (including, but not limped to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments: a) Eight single-family residences currently occupy the land proposed for the condominium complex These homes would be demolished or removed in order to establish a new 156- unit condominium complex The project site is located in a neighborhood characterized by older single-family homes interspersed with a variety of commercial and office uses along Foothill Boulevard The loose and scattered arrangement of the residences occupying the site are not bound by a common link and would not fall into the formal definition of a community A less than significant impact is expected on the established residences on- site b) Land use in the vicinity of the prolect is a combination of single-family residential, multi- family residential, and community commercial uses Residential uses in conjunction with retail establishments are the designed land uses for the Mixed Use designation with in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts Development of the proposed 156-unit condominium complex would be in conformance with permitted uses, and would be required to conform to architectural and landscape designs contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Approval of the Development Distract Amendment, which would include the conversion of 0 7 acre of land from Community Commercial to Mixed Use, would reduce impacts associated with incompatible land use to a less than significant level c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the prolect site is not within an area known to contain sensitive biological resources, therefore, development would not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals or any conservation plans L r1 LJ ~~~ `~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenball r SiOniM1Cant I ect ~ecem Mi Miapabon Inw tea m Si9n,ficant 1 xt No I ct 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specrfic plan or other land use plan Comments: a) According to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, the site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, therefore, there is no impact b) According to the City's General Pian, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, the site is not designated as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact C Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwenbal~r Less TM1an SipniLCeM Lear Than S~pn,hcant I em rtll Mibpabon Into tatetl $iyml¢ant I n No I act 11. NOISE. Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () (/) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport Land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) In October 2003, Mestre Greve Associates and Wieland Associates separately prepared a Noise Analysis to identify noise impacts associated with the development of 18 single- . family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums The report utilized the City's noise standards, which are based upon the Community Noise Equivalent Level / \~l~ \~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 21 (CNEL) codex Standards adopted for the City of Rancho Cucamonga included a 65 CNEL • for exterior noise, and a 45 CNEL for interior noise. The primary noise source in the protect area is traffic noise from San Bemardmo Road and Foothill Boulevard For the analysis, noise measurements were obtained along Foothill Boulevard at three representative cross section locations on the protect site In addition, future traffic information was received from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Federal Highway Administration's Highway Noise Model was used to compute equivalent noise levels based on input information including, traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry Results of the study concluded that units with fast and second floor exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard would be exposed to maximum traffic noise levels of 68.7 CNEL. Maximum noise levels for dwelling units along San Bemardmo Road would be 61.5 CNEL Noise attenuation measures would be required for ands with fvst and second floor patio exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard Second floor condominiums along Foothill Boulevard would also require a 23 7-decibel exterior to interior noise reduction to be achieved through implementation of budding upgrades during construction The following measures would be required to mitigate impacts to noise standards established by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1) Noise barriers shall be required for units with first floor patio exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard. Buildings 3, 9, 10, and 11, will regwre 6-foot high barriers and building 12 will regwre a 5-foot barrier. All barriers shall be constructed with a surtace density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and • shall have no openings or gaps. 2) Noise barriers shall be required for units with second floor balcony exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard. Buildings 3, 9, and 11, shall require a 6-foot high barrier and building 12 shall require a 5.5-foot high barrier. All noise barriers must have a surtace density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot and shall have no openings or gaps. 3) Plan 4 master bedrooms shall require a building upgrede of dual glazed windows meeting a Sound Transmission Class 30 rating. 4) Mitigation measures recommended within the Noise Analysis shall be strictly adhered to, and stipulated as a condition of approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. b) The residential development would not generate excessive groundborne vibrations or noise levels Groundborne vibrations could be generated during on-site grading or construction actrvities but would only be short-term No impact is expected due to excessive groundborne vibration or noise c-d) During post-construction, the residential development would not exceed noise standards established by the City of Rancho Cucamonga nor would noise levels exceed current ambient noise levels According to the noise analysis performed for the protect site, the primary noise source within the area is traffic noise associated with Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road Implementation of mitgation measures within this section would reduce elevated noise levels to a less than significant level During construction short-term ambient noise levels may rise due to construction-related actnrities such as grading, hammering, or pneumatic tool operation The following ~~~ _ `~' Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 mdigation measures would be enforced to control short-term noise levels within the protect vicinity 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. The Planning Division may require monitoring at other times. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e-f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and there are no public or private airports wthin two miles of the site The site is located approximately three miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated Issues and Supporting Information Sources vnamta~ly ~ man siontficara ~~ roan S,Omhcant oft Miapaeon 9gnihcant No I Inro eE I n I en 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () (/) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () (/) ( ) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () (/) ( ) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments. a) The City of Rancho Cucamonga estimates the build-out population of the City to be approximately 160,000 individuals according to the General Plan The protect applicant has submitted a maximum occupancy of the 156-unit condominium complex to be 559 people The additional individuals represent less than one percent growth within the City of Rancho Cucamonga compared to population estimates obtained in January of 2003 (population of 137,119, January 2003, Planning Department) The protect site is surrounded by different types of residential and commercial development and would not ~~1~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 23 require extension of infrastructure that might Induce addtional growth Population growth Is considered a less than significant Impact. b-c) The eight houses currently occupying the site would have to be demolished or removed for development of a 156-unit condominium complex Although these houses would be destroyed or displaced, and may be affordable, they are not substantial in number and would be replaced with a larger amount of available housing The displacement of IndlVldn913 from thw clnhf hnmm~n , maw ,.. ...d,.-_~ I___ .~__ _ ----~_-~ ~~-~~ ••. ....,.v .r vv, ro,YGICU IGJ J tIISII JI 1111I1:am Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pdentlrtll r ory ~+ ,e°,~, SlprufiCant M MNpeEOn $,yilficerlt No t I ~ I I 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result In substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental faculties, the construction of which could cause signficant environmental Impacts, In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertonnance objectives for any of the public services a) Flre protection? () () (~) ( ) b) Police protections () () (~) ( ) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Parks () () () (~) e) Other public facillties~ () () (~) ( ) Comments: a) Flre Protection -The proposed protect site Is located north of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman Avenue on the west and Malachite Avenue on the east Fire station 172 is situated on San Bernardino Avenue, approximately 500 feet east of the protect site, adjacent to Malachite Avenue Standard Conditions of Approval from the California Building and Flre Codes would be enforced upon project approval A less than significant Impact Is expected on fire services b) Police Protection -Development of the site would Incrementally Increase the need for routine police protection services In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development Impact fees as adopted by the Clty Council This Is a less than significant Impact c) Schools -The proposed development would generate additional students Based on a 156-unit condominium complex, a total of 72 students would be generated within the Central School District (0 46 students per dwelling unit), and 32 high school aged students would be generated within the Chaffey Joint Unified Hlgh School District (0 20 students per dwelling unit) Total elementary/middle and high school aged children generated by the project would be an additional 104 students The applicant would be required to pay appropriate school Impact fees The Impact Is considered less than significant d) Parks -The Clty standard for parkland Is five acres for every 1,000 residents The Qwmby Act allows for the collection of 3 acres of parkland, or In-lieu fees, for new residential subdivisions The Clty also supplements the park system by encouraging development of private open space within large residential projects The 156-unit condominium complex Includes recreational amenities such as barbeque/picnic areas, and tot lots, and would pay ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 24 the appropriate developer impact fees as directed by City Planning Staff No Impact on parks Is expected e) Publlc Facilities/Services -Development of the site would Incrementally Increase traffic on adtacent streets In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would pay appropnate development Impact fees as adopted by the City Council Impacts on Publlc Services are considered to be less than signrficant • Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~Ir Sipirfiram I lean man san,rMam AUhpahan I ~ Lass ,non S,pnaoanl I No I 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a-b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan contains a park standard of five acres of parkland per 1000 residents The proposed development would add 559 additional residents to the area, and would provide 6 7 acres of private usable open space to Include BBQ/picnic areas and tot lots In addition, the Crty Implements developer Impact fees as an alternative funding source to reach the obtective for park acreage per resident The applicant would be required to pay any assessed impact fees and construction of on- srte recreational facilities would not create an adverse physical effect on the environment, therefore no impact Is expected Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paenhmlr lean man spfahcam Less n,en Sipruhcera 1 an Mihpahon Into te0 Sie,vhcent I No I 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial Increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result In a change In air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change In location that results in substantial safety risks ~-C, ~G\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTTi6567 Page 25 Issues and Supporting Information Sources' vo~ent,mlr Lau rnan s~nr.,", Lsv ,~,,,, Siprvfirant 1 M Lbbpebon I ~ sipnfieem I No I d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () (/) ( ) (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () (/) ( ) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a-b) The protect proposes the construction of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condominiums, which would generate an additional 1,070 vehicle trips per day Access is provided to the site via two gated driveways, one on Foothill Boulevard and one on San Bernardino Road Foothill Boulevard is a mafor east/west divided arterial street, estimated to service 23,800 vehicle taps per day Vehicle trips would increase by 4 5 percent due to the protect The Protect is in conformance wdh County CMP and Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model which, calculates 77 two-way vehicle taps during peak hour The protect will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land use, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis Conformance to Foothill Boulevard District design standards and implementation of street improvements associated with City . established standards would be required to maintain a Level of Service E or better at intersections As part of City designated standards, street improvements such as curb and gutter, street lighting, and additional fuming lanes would be installed along Foothill Boulevard to relieve impacts associated with the increased traffic generated along this mafor arterial Installation of directed improvements and the payment of any fees associated with the development would reduce the impacts from protect-generated traffic to less than significant c) The site is offset north of Ontario Airport by 3 1 miles and is approximately 1 mile north of the Metrolink rail lines The protect would not interfere with air or rail traffic d-e) The protect proposes the construction of 18 single-family detached condominiums and 138 attached condomimums, which would generate an additional 1,070 vehicle trips per day The protect would be required to conform to Foothill Boulevard District design standards and implement street improvements associated with City standards of approval As part of City designated standards, street improvements such as curb and gutter, street lighting, and additional turning lanes would be required along Foothill Boulevard Street improvements would ensure smooth traffic flow and increase access for emergency vehicles The protect design includes two access points for emergency vehicles Installation of directed improvements and the payment of any fees associated with the development would reduce the impacts from traffic hazards to less than significant f) According to the City's Development Code, a total of 354 parking spaces must be provided Of the total 156 dwelling units, 104 units require two spaces each, 26 of the units require 1 8 spaces each, and another 26 units require 2 3 spaces per unit Additionally, for every four units, one off-street parking stall is required The proposed site plan includes a total of . 376 spaces, which exceeds the City standard by 22 spaces, therefore, no impact is expected -~ 1~`-" • Imtlal Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 26 g) Foothill Boulevard Is an existing fixed route transit service corridor with the potential for transfer points and park and ride facilities Included in the Foothill Boulevard Districts are regwrements for sidewalks and pedestrian friendly areas Also along Foothill Boulevard are scheduled Class II bike lanes, which are located next to the curb or edge of paved roadways and are a minimum of five feet in width The proposed protect would be regwred to comply with adopted pollees, therefore, no conflicts with alternative transportation pollees are expected. Issues and Supporting Information Sources. POlmbell r a~ ~I m~ Slpn,hcant I rth MibObuon Inco etl Sipn~ficam I n No I 16. UTILRIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Requre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that rt has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commdments~ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity () () () (/) to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a-b/e) Existing housing on-site is served by underground septic systems The septic tanks would be removed in accordance with Environmental Health Department protocols, and disposed of properly The proposed protect would tie into existing wastewater infrastructure located within adtacent streets The developer would make all needed and necessary Improvements The protect is estimated to create 32,500 gallons per day of sewer flows The Cucamonga County Water District operates the sewer line within Foothill Boulevard south of the protect and has indicated the ability to serve the protect's wastewater needs No impact Is expected on wastewater facilities c) Development of the protect site would require the installation of storm water conveyance structures such as curb and gutter systems, catch basins, and culverts In addition, the applicant has formulated a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes / `~~ to` Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 27 signage on outlets to the storm water system, and the use of dram inserts to effectively remove debns including trash, grease and oil, sediments, and particulates The Cucamonga Creek Channel would be the final receptor for storm waters, and any additional improvements would be made to safely accept the additional flows No impact is expected on storm water drainage d) The Cucamonga County Water District has indicated the ability to serve the proposed development Existing water Imes have been installed in both San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard and serve other residential and commercial developments located north and south of the proposed protect New or altered water delivery systems are not anticipated i) The current City approved solid waste provider would serve the proposed development No alterations in the type or scope of services would be regwred. No impact on solid waste disposal is expected g) The protect would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 No impact to Federal, State, or local regulations is expected Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pne,meliv ~m~ sioninn,n, ~ than Sipn,ficnnt I en nn M,openon Inco mtetl Sipn,ficem 1 en No I en 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () (/) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistary~ b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () (/) ( ) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects, which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• ~1 u a) No State or federally listed endangered, threatened, or sensitive species were encountered on the site Based upon the degraded condition of the habitat, none are expected to occur No unique habitat was encountered on-site Mitigation has been proposed to protect possible nesting birds according to State Fish and Game Codes 3503 and 3503 5 Eight . structures currently stand on-site, of which, none qualify for National or California Registers and therefore are not considered significant under CEQA No additional cultural resources ~-~ 1~2 Initial Study for DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 are known for the protect area The cultural assessment determined that no impact to any existing or future fossil resources that may be located within the study area exists A less than significant impact is expected on cultural and biological resources b) Protect related impacts assocated with increased art emission and elevated noise levels would be mitigated to less than significant The protect location has been disturbed for many years dating back to the 1 BSOs when the land was used for ranching and agricultural actmties In 1928 residential structures were beginning to be established, followed by the establishment of several surrounding commercial businesses The residences currently occupying the srte are served by septic waste disposal systems The new development would utilize the City's sewer system and implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to control pollutants within storm, or site run-off The residential development would not be associated with significant emission of pollutants Development of other housing protects and some neighborhood commercial protects is occurring within the area These types of protects are encouraged by the City to meet both the housing and consumptive needs of current and new residents The new residential development would contribute to cumulative impacts c) The protect would not create substantially adverse impacts on humans either directly or indirectly Adding pollutants to an area where air quality is a problem would have an affect on immediate achievement of clean air goals but all operational pollutant levels are below thresholds set to avoid adverse health effects Mitigation measures contained m this Initial Study will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drrve (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) (/) Tom Dodson and Associates, Biological Survey on an Approximately 13-Acre Parcel in Rancho Cucamonga, March 2003 (/) Borer, Jim Certified Arbonst #496 Arborist Report, Protect Location Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2008-141-06 Through 17, 33 Through 35, 37, and 38, 208-151-20 Through 23, San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard Between Layton and Malachite (Approximately) Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, June 12, 2003 (/) Michael Brandman Assocates A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment, Paleontological Records Search, and Architectural History Evaluation Laing Homes' Due Diligence for Parcels Along Foothill Boulevard, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, May 16, 2003 (/) RMA Group, Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed 200 Unit Town Houses W/o Klusman Road E/o Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, March 6, 2003 ~~~ ~G~ Irntial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 29 (/) Petra Geotechmcal Inc , Envvonmental Division Final Phase I Environmental Site i Assessment and Limited Phase II Investigation, 13 Parcels Located on Foothill Boulevard, Bounded by San Bemardino Road to the North, Between Hellman Avenue and Klusman Road, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, March 28, 2003 (/) Mestre Greve Associates, Noise Analysis for Tentatve Tract 16567, City of Rancho Cucamonga, October 10, 2003 (/) Wieland Associates, Acoustical Evaluation for Tentative Tract 16567, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, October 9, 2003 ~~~ I ~~ Irntlal Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037, SUBTT16567 Page 30 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certrfy that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed m this India) Study. I acknowledge that I have read this India) Study and the proposed mdigation measures Further, I have revised the protect pla{~s or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mdigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signrficant environmental effects would occur. ApphcanYs Signet Date: 3'2 ~ y ~ A Pnnt Name and Tdle: - R~IIO'ft~a~, Nee.` t Se.r ~~y-a;c~ (Y~vvo.ge+~ r\plan n ing\final\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-01036i.s.. doc C~ s ~-~ 1~S ~J City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration ~s being cveulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Protect File No.: Development District Amendment DRC2003-01037, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567, and Development Review DRC2003-01036 Related Files: Historic Point of Interest DRC2004-00105 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139 Public Review Period Closes: April 14, 2004 Project Name: Prolect Applicant: John Laing Homes Prolect Location (also see attached map): Located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues -APN 0208-141-06 thru 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 38 and 0208-151-07, 14, and 19 thru 23 Protect Description A request to change the zone fora 7 acre portion of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard D~stncts from Community Commercial to Mixed Use, to subdrwde 12 74 net acres into 23 numbered and 9 lettered lots, and to develop 18 single-family detached condominwms and 138 attached condominwms with"common recreation facilities and common area landscaping FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fording: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially signrficant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period April 14. 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By {`~ ~ (~~~ 1~ RESOLUTION NO 0434 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2003-01037 REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FORA 7 ACRE PORTION OF SUBAREA 3 OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 020&151-20 THRU 23 A Rentals 1 John Laing Homes filed an application for Development Distnct Amendment DRC2003-01037, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development District Amendment is referred to as 'Yhe application " 2 On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites poor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on April 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approwmately 7 acre of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located north of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial, and b The property to the north of the subject site issingle-family residential, the property to the south consists of a commeroial retail center, the property to the east is commercial, and the property to the west is a mobile home park, and c This amendment does not conflict moth the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and Hall provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and moth related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially in~unous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties a-~ 1~~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-34 DRC2003-01037 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speufic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distnct m terms of access, sure, and compatibility with ewstmg land use m the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and mfortnat~on contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, together wrath all wntten and oral reports mGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration nnth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that null result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon nnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which vnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Secbon 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Distract Amendment DRC2003-01037 subject to each and every condition set forth below 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Gty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a ~-c,1~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-34 DRC2003-01037 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 3 result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiGpate at ds own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiGpation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condrt~on BY 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary . I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the following vote-to-Nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~~ lo~ . RESOLUTION NO 0435 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16567, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 12 74 NET ACRES OF LAND INTO 23 NUMBERED AND 9 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 18 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS AND 138 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS WITH COMMON RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND BETWEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-141-06 THRU 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, AND 38 AND 020&151-07, 14, AND 19 THRU 23 A Recitals 1 Laing Homes filed an application for the approval of Tentative Trail Map SUBTT16567, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detennrned, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 14, 2004, mdudmg wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to properties located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardmo Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, with a street frontage on Foothill Boulevard of 722 91 feet and lot depth of 682 47 feet, and is presently mostly undeveloped with some scattered single-story residential and commeroial structures, and b The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential, the property to the south consists of a commeroial retail center, the property to the east is commernal, and the property to the west is a mobile home park 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows I ~~ \ 1 O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0435 SUBTT16567-JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 Page 2 . a That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent ninth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans; and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent ninth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and The site is physiG~lly suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to G3use substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wnldlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to G~use senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict v~nth any easement acquved by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property vvithin the proposed subdwis~on 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, togethervwth all wntten and oral reports inGuded forthe environmental assessment for the appliG3tion, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance moth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative DeGarat~on and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Decaration ninth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration ident~es certain significant environmental effects that moll result if the project is approved, all significent effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mdigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect moll have potential for an adverse impact upon mnldlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the (`Mitigated) Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference C_ J ~' 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0435 SUBTT16567-JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 Page 3 Plamm~c Division 1) Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 is granted subtectto the approval of DRC2004-00105 (Histonc Point of Interest) and compliance v~nth applicable conditions of approval Enaineennc Division 1) Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance month City "Mator Divided Artenal" standards as regwred and including curb-to-curb 13-foot, 11-foot, 11-foot, and 14foot nght-tum lane a) Provde curb, gutter, sidewalk, 16,000 Lumens HPSV streetlights, street trees, R26 traffic signs, and other missing public improvements as regwred b) Provide a separate westbound nght-tum only lane (150 feet plus 60 feet reverse curve) on Foothill Boulevard at the protect dnveway per City Standard No 119 c) Foothill Boulevard entrance location shall be in accordance with the City's Dnveway Policy d) Gated dnveway shall conform to the City standard "Residential Protect Gated Entrance Design Gwde " e) Remove and replace the dnve approaches on the Shell Gas Station on Foothill Boulevard Also complete full frontage improvements The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the public improvements from future development ofAPN 020&151-19 if thedeveloperfailsto submit for said reimbursement agreement within suc months of the public improvements being accepted by the Gty, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall temtinate 2) San Bemardmo Road shall be improved m accordance with City "Collector" standards as regwred and including a) Provide a c pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnve approach, suc 5800 Lumens HPSV streetlights, street trees, and other missing public improvements, as requved b) Gated dnveway shall conform to the City standard "Residential Protect Gated Entrance Design Guide " 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the protect side of San Bernardino Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole west of Malachite Avenue to the first pole offsite of the easterly protect boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing San Bernardino Road shall be undergrounded at the same time including R-C~ ~\Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-35 SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 Page 4 the line service east of the westerly protect boundary The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement wwthin sa months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) The ewstmg overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) located on-site shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site of the westerly property boundary to the first pole off-site of the easterly protect boundary 5) An in-I~eu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utdit~es (telecommunication and electncal) on the opposite side of San Bernardino Road shall be paid to the City pnor to the approval of the final map or issuance of building pertmts, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted amount times the length of the protect frontage on San Bernardino Road 6) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and San Bernardino Road The developer shall receive credit of $120,000 00 against, and reimbursement costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance ninth City Policy If the developerfads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 7) Vacation of 2nd Avenue, located north of Foothill Boulevard, shall be processed, approved, and recorded pnor to approval of the final tract map or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first 8) Depending upon who receives ownership of the vacated 2nd Avenue, this development ~s responsible for all processing and improvements necessary to accomplish the vacation 9) Construct appropnate off-site street improvements from transition to ewstmg 10) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the back of the sidewalk to the top of the curb along Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road 11) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 12) Provide drainage devices to handle the runoff downward to the slopes on the east and south boundanes respectively 13) The final Tract Map SUBTT16567 shall be approved and recorded pnor to issuance of budding permits ~-e~ \\`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-35 SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 • Page 5 Environmental Mitigation Air Qualify 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated moth vehicle traclung of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) or vegetative ground covers shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 4) Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at 15 m p h orbelowat all Mmes . 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment ~s being properly serviced and mamtamed per manufacturers' speufications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 6) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply moth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through • seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads ~kC- ~\~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-35 SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 Page 6 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance vwth local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high Hnnds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 m p.h) in accordance vwth Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 10) The construction contractor shall utdu.e electric or clean altematrve fuel powered equipment where feasible 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans inGude a statement that work crews vvtll shut off egwpment when not in use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiGency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane vwndows and weather-stripping Bro/og~ca/ Resources 1) Prior to clearing and grubbing activities, a qualified biologist shall examine the property to determine if birds are nesting on the site pnor to initiation of ground disturbance 2) The Coast Live Oak tree shall be moved or replaced in kind wdh mature speGmen in a location to be detennined by City Planner Cultural Resources 1) Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard The developer shall offer the structure(s) to the public, for relocation or salvage, for a period of 30 days pnor to demolition 2) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to preserve the historical information relative to the eight identified structures to the City Planner Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed pnor to the first occupancy • r1 LJ A-C~ ~« PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0435 SUBTT16567-JOHN LAING HOMES April 5, 2004 • Page 7 3) If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered dunng earthmoving adrvit~es, earthmowng shall be stopped and uncovered resources shall be tested for historical significance under the Advisory Councl on Historic Preservation Criterion A, B, C, and D prior to continued impact 4) If any preh~stonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Nell retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction act~wties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Nnll • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sties from demoldion or significant modification Nnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites Nnthin new developments, using theirspecal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, • important, and unique prehistoric resources, folloNnng appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report vnth original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 5) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 dictates that ~f any human remains are unearthed dunng construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 Geology and Soils 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the pernit applicant shall submdto City Officals for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), specficelly identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on- site to reduce pollutants entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion /-~-~ „I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0435 SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 5, 2004 Page 8 • Norse 1) Noise bamers shall be regwred for units ~nnth first floor patio extenor livng areas along Foothill Boulevard Bwldings 3, 9, 10, and 11 will regwre 6-foot high bamers and Building 12 null require a 5-foot bamer All bamers shall be constructed nnth a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps 2) Noise bamers shall be regwred for units with second floor balcony extenor living areas along Foothill Boulevard Buildings 3, 9, and 11 shall require a 6-foot high bamer and Building 12 shall regwre a 5.5-foot high bamer All noise bamers must have a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot and shall have no openings or gaps 3) Plan 4 master bedrooms shall regwre a building upgrade of dual glazed ~nnndows meeting a Sound Transmission Class 30 rating 4) Mitigation measures recommended vnthin the Noise Analysis shall be stnctly adhered to, and stipulated as a condition of approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of • 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speufied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 The Planning Diwsion may require monitonng at other times Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division wnthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance vnth above nose standards or halted 7) Haul truck delrvenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • a-c~ ~~~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-35 SUBTT16567 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 5, 2004 Page 9 BY APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rich Mauas, Chavman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the follovwng vote-to-nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~-C~ 1\~b City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 and Development Rewew DRC2003-01036 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division/Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 and Development Review DRC2003-01036 • Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined bythe protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits u `~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037 Applicant: John Laing Homes Initial Study Prepared by: Alan Warren Date: February 20.2004 1 •. Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of plans C p shall submd construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be uttlized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C Z/q performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C Z noted in SCAQMD Rule 11013 Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be CE C Review of plans A q swept according to a schedule established bythe City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at CP C During A/C 2/q 15m p h or below at all times construction 1 of 6 s ~ • ^i 1 ; r .. .. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Streets shall be swept according to a schedule CE C During A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to construction adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils ~ BOICE C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BOICE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) dailyto reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A q RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 2of6 s ~' 1 ; U' -• .. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of plans A/C 2/q construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C p/q requred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercal structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z/q required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources Prior to clearing and grubbing achvdies, a qualified CP/CP B Prwr to AID 2 biologist shall examine the property to determine if birds grading are nesting on the site prior to initiation of ground disturbance The Coast Live Oak tree shall be preserved on-site in CP B/C Review of plans AIC 2/4 accordance with the recommendations of the arborist report Cultural Resources Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard, the CP B 30 days prior to D 2 developer shall offer the structure(s) to the public, for demolition relocation or salvage, for a period of thirty days prior to demolition Pnor to issuance of bulding permits, the applicant shall CP B Pnor to C p/3 submit plans for adequate plaque and exhibit issuance of documentation of the site to preserve the historical building information relative to the eight identified structures to permits/Review the City Planner Installation of the approved plaques of plans and exhibits shall be installed prior to the first occupancy If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered CP/CE C During A q during earthmoving activities, earthmoving shall be construction stopped and uncovered resources shall be tested for historical significance under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Criterion A, B, C, and D, prior to continued impact LJ 3 of 6 .. . . .. . . . . ... .. . . • ~ .. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to mondor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 sties from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 CP C Review of report AID q dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 4 of 6 c/ U . . . . .. . . .. . . . Geology and Soils Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant CP/CE B Prior to grading B/C 2 shall submit to CityOfficials for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SW PPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical All disturbed and bare or exposed sails shall be kept CP B Review of A/C 4 moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping plans/Dunng as soon as possible to avoid erosion construction Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A q hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Noise barriers shall be required for units with first floor CP BCD Review of Plans A/C 2/q patio exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard Buildings 3, 9, 10, and 11, will require 6-foot high barriers and building 12 wtll require a 5-foot barrier All barriers shall be constructed with a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps Noise barriers shall be required for units with second CP BCD Review of Plans A/C 2/4 floor balcony exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard Buildings 3, 9, and 11, shall require a 6-foot high barrier and building 12 shall require a 5 5-foot high barrier All noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot and shall have no openings or gaps Plan 4 master bedrooms shall require a bulding BO BCD Review of AIC 2/q upgrade of dual glazed windows meeting a Sound Plans/During Transmission Class 30 rating Construction Mitigation measures recommended within the Noise CP/BO BCD Review of A/C 2/4 Analysis shall be strictly adhered to, and stipulated as a Plans/Dunng condition of approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Construction 5of6 1 .. . . .. . . . . .. ... .. . . -. , .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Dtvision wdhin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced 1n intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POIBO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Cdy Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - Wdhhold CeKiflrate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposd or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdation i \planning\final\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-01036,37mmmcklst doc 6of6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16567 SUBJECT: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT APPLICANT: JOHN LAING HOMES LOCATION: NORTHSIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETW EEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE AVENUES ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16567 is granted subject to the approval of DRC2003-01037 and DRC2003-01036 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map ~s filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, DRC2003-01036, and Master Plan 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for • consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first SC-1-04 1 ~~~ \~ Comolehon Date -~-~- -~_~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- D. E. F. Prg ect No SUBlT16567 Comolehon Date 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / / other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Commurnty or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ time of building permit issuance 4 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ' / / Homeowners Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Droisions ,_ ___ _ and the Crty Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 5 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~ / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 6 The protect contains a designated Historic Point of Interest The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance wdh DRC2004-00105 _ _ 7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ regwrements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunityconcems, hours of construction actrviry, dust control measures, and security fencing Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on / / this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking _ _ _ on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for / / the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas _ _ _ within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of bwlding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation _ _ _ to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigahon measures The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report ' 2 The applicant shall submit certificahon from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of / / the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and _ _ _ exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Dmsion prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 3 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to _ _ _ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory • pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures, These funds maybe used by the City to SC-1-04 2 A ~ ~~ Protect No SU8TT76567 Completion Date retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mdigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for ati interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder tratls, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 33 total feet on San Bernardino Road 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs 1. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefaciiities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees SC-1-04 ~~_ / / -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / /_/ `~~ Protect No SUBTT16567 Comolehon Date 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a sourcE of energy, fuel or power to any budding service egwpment which Is regulated by technical code; and for which a permit Is regwred unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations anc ordinances, all Improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have beer completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more thar one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage o1 those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings of units be connected to energy prior to completlon and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 6 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Troll Median Island Bike Treil Other Foothill Boulevard X X (c) X X X San Bernardino Road X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Cary Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer SC-1-04 4 ~ _ n 1 2~ ~_ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- / / Protect No SUBTT16567 Comoleflon Date SC-1-04 Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connectior through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FITC) The size, placement, anc location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and sublect to Ciq Engineer review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits or final map approval whichever comes first 6 Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer Prior to any work being pertormed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required 7 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program 8 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size sty San Bemartlino Road Legerstroemia rndica Crape Myrtle Hybnd - 3 ft 20 ri o c 24-inch ?uscarora' Pmk box Foothill BoulevaW Rhus lances African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill- Non-actmry centers - Informal m Pnmenly in R O W groupdings not more than 25°h of total frontage trees STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR ON-SITE PLAN REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS Foothill Boulevard Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 ft Space per on- 15•gal Non-aclrviry centers - sine plans - 30 On-site ft o c suggested This pnmary theme tree for Foothill must be behintl the row per Caltrens ~.onstrucnon rvores rot sneer I tees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sublect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only _/___/_ -~-~- ~-/. ~~- -~-~- ~-C~ 1'~\ J. K. L. M. N. Prote ct No SU6TT16567 Comolet~on Date 9 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engteer for conformance with / / adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect _ _ intersections, including driveways Local restdenttal street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight platted as required Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to tom and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~ / Districts shall be fled with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding _ _ permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~ / approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall _ be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the / / property from adtacent areas _ _ _ Improvement Completion 1 If the requred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, / / an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed bythe Developer and the City _ _ will be required for Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility _ _ Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the /~ Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the _ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved / / Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from _ _ _ them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new streetlights for the first six months of operation, priorto final map approval or priorto building _ _ _ permit issuance if no map is involved u SC-1-04 6 / ,-~ 1~~ Protect No SU6TT16567 Completion Date 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable it at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the fvst bwldtng permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ._L__/_ sc-i-oa 2 ~ ~~~ 1 J~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS February 3, 2004 Main Street Route 66 J Laing Homes Tract 16567 N/S Foothill Blvd Between Hellman & Archibald DRC2003-01036 & SUBTT16567 MFR, SFR & Recreation Buildings THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gmdelmes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m multi-faintly residential projects is 400- feet No portion of the extenor wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b The maximum dtstance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500- feet No portton of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the dtstance shall not exceed 200-feet c Ftre hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regmred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route azound the extenor of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The regmred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed is 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch Thts flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station momtonng This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regmred fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow ~'~ ~~`~ 3 Firewater plans aze required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wrthm 600-feet of the proposed prolectsite. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system undergound supply piping Approval of the undergound supply piping system must be obtazned prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califomia Fire Code and the approved alternative method # 05678 require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed to accordance to NFPA 13-R & RCFPD Standard 10-5 section III-D 1 Multi-faintly residential structures m excess of 4 units. 2 All structures that do not meet Ftre Distnct access requirements (see Fire Access) 3 When the building access does not meet the regmrements of the 2001 Califomia Building Code and the RCFPD Ftre Department Access -Fire Lane Standazd #F191 10 20 4 When any applicable code or standazd requires the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System I The California Ftre Code and the RCFPD Approved Alternative Method requires a Central Station Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Fire Alann, based on the occupancy, lack of FD access and/or the number of sprinkler heads Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the approved alternative method # 05678, the California Building Code, RCFPD Ftre Alarm Standazd #10-6 and the California Ftre Code 2 Pnor to installation of the fire alarm system, Ftre Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Ftre Alann Standazd #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standazd #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1~` story exterior wall shall be located within the liit»ts of the approved alternative method and site plan for Fire Distnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route azound the exterior of the building Landscaped azeas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobsttvcted width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radms shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches . f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side -~ 1 ~~ g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20%. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adlacentto the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-Inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department appazatus 3. Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standazds. 4 Access Walkways Hazdscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Residential gates installed across Fire Distract access roads shall be installed m accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a. All automatic gates shall be provided wrth a Fire Distract approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device The devices shall be digital Analog dewces are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed m accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be ]ocated outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use m the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A Vaffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included m the azchrtectural plans subrrutted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: approved mitigation measures per the alternative method must be cleazly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-9Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Ftre Distract vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Ftre Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required wrth the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which m the~udgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazazdous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Public Assembly FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fue Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form a]ong with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 3 /~ -~ `~ 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access • a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property Itne, or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distnc[. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distnct approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Ftre Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal a. The current title reports to provide a legal descnphon and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement b. The assessor's pazcel numbers of each pazcel subject to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distnct access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regmrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regmred pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or aze located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adjacent propemes, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e. Is shazed by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemazdino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water math system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standazds Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regmred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 . and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 4 ~ ~ \~~ All pnvate on-sRe fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to dehvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Ftre construction Servtces will inspect the installation, wttness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped . 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The apphcant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Ftre Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants wrthm a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Subrmttal Procedure Standazd # and #9-5 All requtred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to dehvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and wttness the hydrant flushing Ftre Construction Servtces shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Ftre Construction Servtces must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Construction Access The access roads must be paved to accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Ftre Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The apphcant is responstble for obtumng the fire flow mfotmahon from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Servtces 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernazdtno PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Ftre Construction Servtces' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO . OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway to accordance with the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Engtneenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the putpose of final acceptance, a ][tensed spnnkler contractor, to the presence of Ftre Construction Servtces, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responstble for tilting the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Servtces venfymg the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the requtred fire flow m accordance with the California Ftre Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the tssuance of a Certtficate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Servtces 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the tssuance of a Certtficate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler monttonng system must be tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Servtces The fire spnnkler monttonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be tnspected, tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Servtces before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed m service 6 Fire Alarm System Pnor to the tssuance of a Certtficate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system . shall be installed, tnspected, tested and accepted by Ftre Construction Servtces 5 p-c ~ ~~ am 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the tssuance of a Cemficate of Occupancy, vehiculaz gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standazds #9-1 or #9-2 by . Fire Construction Services 8. Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the tssuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed to accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Ftre CODSIiuCUOn Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit pazking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-faintly dwellings shall post the address with rruntmum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Pnor to the tssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi-faintly buildings shall post the address with mtmmum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illutntnated dunng penods of dazkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch mtmmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or bmlt with lazge setbacks m multi-tenant commercial and mdustnal buildings The Butte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11. Hazardous Materials Pnor to the tssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must . demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernazdino County Ftre Department, Hazazdous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form Thts form provides contact information for Ftre Distnct use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the tssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standazd #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required to the standazd The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Ftre Inspector 6 A- C- ~~ RESOLUTION NO 04-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01036, AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2004-00139, A REQUEST TO MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOP 18 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS FRONTING SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND 138 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS WITH COMMON RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING ON 12 74 NET ACRES, LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND BETWEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITE AVENUES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0208-141-O6THRU 18, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, AND 38 AND 0208-151-07, 14, AND 19 THRU 23 A. Recitals 1 John Laing Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-01036, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meetng on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on April 14, 2004, inGuding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to properties located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, ninth a street frontage on Foothill Boulevard of 722 91 feet and lot depth of 682 47 feet, and is presently mostly undeveloped wrath some scattered single-story residential and commercial structures, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is single-family residential, the property to the south consists of commercial retail center, the property to the east is commercial, and the property to the west is a mobile home park 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent wrath the obtectrves of the General Plan, and \~O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed use rs rn accord vwth the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the drstnct m which the site rs located, and c The proposed use is rn compliance nnth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together vwth the conditions applicable thereto, v~nll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mtunous to properties or improvements m the vicrnrty. 4 Based upon the facts and rnfonnation contained rn the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there rs no substantial evidence that the project will have a srgnificant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative DeGaration has been prepared m compliance vwth the Cafrfomra Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the mfonnation contained rn said Mitigated Negative Decaration ninth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that vwll result if the protect rs approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect whwh are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decaration for the protect, there rs no evidence that the proposed protect v~nll have potential for an adverse impact upon vnldlife resources or the habitat upon which Hnldlrfe depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained rn the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mfortnation provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth rn paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condrGon setforth below and rn the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannma Division 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00139 rs hereby approved subtect to the mitigations measures contained herein below 2) Approval of Development Review DRC2003-01036 is granted subject to the approval of DRC2004-00105 (Historic Point of Interest) and compliance vnth applicable conditions of approval / ~~ \ `1\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0436 DRC2003-01036-JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 3 3) Site Plan -The patios along the west boundary shall be ad/usted to provide a mirnmum 20-foot setback and a continuous buffer of the Podocarpus evergreen trees shall be provided along the project boundary 4) Mailboxes - A central¢ed mailbox shall be provided within the community budding Alternatively, gang mailboxes designed into architectural structures (e g ,trellis) may be located throughout the probed subbed to the approval of the City Planner 5) Foothill Boulevard Landscaping -The follov~nng elements shall be provided consistent with the Suburban Parkway design of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan a) In addition to London Plane trees, the informal tree clusters shall include California Sycamore and Purple Plum Rhus lances is no longer the desired tree speaes in the parkway b) There shall be greater meander in the public sidewalk, except where the nght-turn lane is located This may necessitate sidewalk easement, slope changes, and/or retaining walls 6) All pertinent conddions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 shall apply 7) Air conditioning unds, located outside pnvate patios, shall be screened by shrubs 8) All stone veneer shall extend below ground surface 9) The split rail wood fence shall be substituted wrath concrete rails 10) All wood gates shall have metal frames Enoineenno Division 1) Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance v~nth City "Mayor Divided Arsenal" standards as regwred and including curb-to-curb 13-foot, 11-foot, 11-foot, and 14-foot nght-turn lane a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, 16,000 Lumens HPSV streetlights, street trees, R26 traffic signs, and other missing public improvements as regwred b) Provide a separate westbound nght-turn only lane (150 feet plus 60 feet reverse curve) on Foothill Boulevard at the probed dnveway per City Standard No 119 . c) Foothill Boulevard entrance location shall be in accordance v~nth the City's Dnveway Policy ~~ \'~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 4 • d) Gated dnveway shall conform to the City standard "Residential Protect Gated Entrance Design Gwde " e) Remove and replace the dnve approaches on the Shell Gas Station on Foothill Boulevard Also complete full frontage improvements The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the public improvements from future development of APN 020&151-19 If the developerfails to submit for said reimbursement agreement vinthm su; months of the public improvements bemg accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terrnnate 2) San Bemardmo Road shall be improved m accordance moth City "Collector" standards as required and mcludmg a) Prowde a c pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, dnve approach, suc 5800 Lumens HPSV streetlights, street trees, and other missing public improvements, as regwred b) Gated dnveway shall conform to the City standard "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Gwde " 3) The existing overhead utdrties (telecommunications and electrical) on • the protect side of San Bemardmo Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole west of Malachite Avenue to the first pole offsite of the easterly project boundary, poor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing San Bemardmo Road shall be undergrounded at the same time mcludmg the Ime service east of the westerly protect boundary The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergroundmg from future development as rt occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement mnthm six months of the public improvements bemg accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) The existing overhead utdihes (telecommunications and electrical) located on-site shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site ofthe westerly property boundary to the first pole off-site of the easterly protect boundary 5) An m-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of San Bemardmo Road shall be paid to the City poor to the approval of the final map or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted amount times the length of the protect frontage on San Bemardmo Road 6) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Arohibald Avenue and San • Bemardmo Road The developer shall receive credit of $120,000 00 ~ 1a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 5 against, and reimbursement costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance vnth City Poliq If the developerfads to submit for said reimbursement agreement vhthin sue months of the public improvements being accepted by the Gty, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 7) Vacation of 2nd Avenue, located north of Foothill Boulevard, shall be processed, approved, and recorded pnor to approval of the final tract map or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first 8) Depending upon who receives ownership of the vacated 2nd Avenue, this development is responsible for all processing and improvements necessary to accomplish the vacation 9) Construct appropnate off-site street improvements from transition to ewsting 10) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the back of the sidewalk to the top of the curb along Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road 11) Provde a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the satisfaction of the City engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 12) Provide drainage dewces to handle the runoff downward to the slopes on the east and south boundanes respectively 13) The final Tract Map SUBTT16567 shall be approved and recorded pnor to issuance of budding permits Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated vnth water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated month vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) or vegetative ground covers shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ,~-c, ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN I.AING HOMES Apnf 14, 2004 Page 6 4) Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at 15 m p.h orbelowat all times 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. 6) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that them use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall inGude the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed overto adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 m p h) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible Q /~ (\~v 1~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0436 DRC2003-01036-JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 Page 7 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews vnll shut off equipment when not in use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high effiGency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping Brolog~cal Resoun;es 1) Pnor to cleanng and grubbing activities, a qualified biologist shall examine the property to determine if birds are nesting on the site pnor to initiation of ground disturbance 2) The Coast Live Oak tree shall be moved or replaced in kind with mature specimen in a location to be determined by City Planner Cultu2/Resources 1) Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard The developer shall offer the structure(s) to the public, for relocation or salvage, for a penod of thirty days pnor to demolition 2) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans for adequate plaque and exhibit documentation of the site to preserve the histoncal information relative to the eight identified structures to the City Planner Installation of the approved plaques and exhibits shall be installed pnor to the first occupancy 3) If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered dunng earthmoving activities, earthmoving shall be stopped and uncovered resources shall be tested for histoncal significance under the Advisory Council on Histonc Preservation Cntenon A, B, C, and D pnor to continued impact 4) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sties Nnthin new developments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point \~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 8 Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mtigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 5) California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 dictates that if any human remains are unearthed dunng construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to ongin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 Geology and Sods 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submR to City Officals for approval, a Store Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and Water Qualify Management Plan (WQMP), specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on- site to reduce pollutants entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) All disturbed and bare or exposed sods shall be kept moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible to avoid erosion Noise 1) Noise bamers shall be required for units with first floor patio extenor living areas along Foothill Boulevard Buildings 3, 9, 10, and 11 will require 6-foot high bamers and Building 12 will require a 5-foot bamer All bamers shall be constructed with a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps 2) Noise bamers shall be required for units with second floor balcony extenor Irving areas along Foothill Boulevard Buildings 3, 9, and 11 shall require a 6-foot high bamer and Budding 12 shall require a 5 5-foot high bamer All noise bamers must have a surface density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot and shall have no openings or gaps 3) Plan 4 master bedrooms shall require a building upgrade of dual glazed windows meeting a Sound Transmission Class 30 rating a ~ i~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-36 DRC2003-01036-JOHN LAING HOMES April 14, 2004 . Page 9 4) Mitigation measures recommended wnthin the Noise Analysis shall be stnctly adhered to, and stipulated as a condition of approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120 The Planning Division may require monitonng at other times Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activdies shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance wrath above noise standards or halted 7) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of B 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any • time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily traps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Macias, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby • certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the following vote-to-wit ~~~ 1`\~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0436 DRC2003-01036 -JOHN LAING HOMES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 10 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. C~ • ~~~ ~u- \ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi 6567 and Development Review DRC2003-01036 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division/Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~-c,1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16567 and Development Review DRC2003-01036 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible Cdy department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may apse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits • ~-c, \S\ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01036, DRC2003-01037 Applicant: John Laing Homes Initial Study Prepared by: Alan Warren Date: February 20.2004 rf l i J • • -• .. Air Quality All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of plans C p shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be ~ infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as ~ well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C p/q performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or ~ high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shall be CE C Review of plans A q swept according to a schedule established by the Cityto reduce PM~o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Speeds on all unpaved haul roads shall be kept at CP C During AIC p/q 15m p h or below at all times construction 1 of 6 .. .. All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Streets shall be swept according to a schedule CE C Dunng A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to construction ad/acent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sals BO/CE C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The sale shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible U V 2of6 i • 1 e i .. . ... .. .. ... -. .. .: . .. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of plans AIC p/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not rn use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C p/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C p/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-strapping Biological Resources Prior to clearing and grubbing activities, a qualified CP/CP B Prior to A/D 2 biologist shall examine the property to determine if birds are nesting on the site prior to initiation of ground grading disturbance The Coast Lroe Oak tree shall be preserved on-site in CP B/C Review of plans A/C z/4 accordance with the recommendations of the arborist report Cultural Resources Regarding the house at 9494 Foothill Boulevard, the CP B 30 days prior to D developer shall offer the structure(s) to the public, for demolition 2 relocation or salvage, for a period of thirty days prior to demolition Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CP B Prior to C submit plans for adequate plaque and exhibit issuance of 2/g documentation of the site to preserve the historical bulding information relative to the eight identified structures to permitslReview the City Planner Installation of the approved plaques of plans and exhibits shall be installed prior to the first occupancy If potentially significant cultural resources are uncovered CP/CE C During q during earthmowng activdies, earthmowng shall be construction 4 stopped and uncovered resources shall be tested for historical signrficance under the Advisory Counctl on Historic Preservation Criterion A, B, C, and D, prior to continued impact 3of6 Sr V • .. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actmties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wail • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunely for the City to establish ds archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 5 CP C Review of report A/D q dictates that if any human remains are unearthed during construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origrn and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 • 4 of 6 • • i • .. . ... .. . ... .. . . . . ... .. . . .: : . . Geology and Soils Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant CPICE B Prior to grading B/C 2 shall submit to CityOffiaals for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SW PPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical All disturbed and bare or exposed soils shall be kept CP B Review of AIC 4 moist or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping plans/During as soon as possible to avoid erosion construction Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Noise barriers shall be required for units with first floor CP BCD Review of Plans A/C 2/4 patio exterior living areas along Foothill Boulevard Bwldmgs 3, 9, 10, and 11, wdl requre 6-foot high barriers and building 12 will require a 5-foot barrier All barriers shall be constructed with a surtace density of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps Noise barriers shall be required for units with second CP BCD Review of Plans AIC 2/4 Floor balcony exterior living areas along Foothill i Boulevard Bwldmgs 3, 9, and 11, shall require a 6-foot high barrier and building 12 shall require a 5 5-foot high barrier All noise barriers must have a surtace densityof at least 3 5 pounds per square foot and shall have no openings or gaps Plan 4 master bedrooms shall require a building BO BCD Review of AIC 2/4 upgrade of dual glazed windows meeting a Sound Plans/During Transmission Class 30 rating Construction Mitigation measures recommended within the Noise CPIBO BCD Review of A/C 2/4 Analysis shall be strictly adhered to, and stipulated as a Plans/During condition of approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Construction 5of6 Key to Checklist Abbreviations . . . . . . . . .. . . . Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ilne Developer shall here a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Satd consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, tf Horse levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m Intensity to a level of compliance wdh above noise standards or halted Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POIBO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, constructlon Intruding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Horse mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensdroe land uses or residential dwellings Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee 8 - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Cdy Engmeer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - W rthhold Certficate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 - Retain Deposd or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdation i lplamm~glfinal\pingcomm\envdoc\dre2003-01036,37mmmcklst dot 6 OfB .ii~ai COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01036 SUBJECT: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT APPLICANT: JOHN LAING HOMES LOCATION: NORTHSIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN HELLMAN AND MALACHITEAVENUES ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemattve, to relinquish such approval The appltcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, offtcers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of tits obligations under this condition 2 Approval of DRC2003-01036 is granted subtect to the approval of DRC2003-01037 and SUBTT16567 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-36, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved to the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire tf building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, DRC2003-01036, and Master Plan SC-1-04 1 ~~~ \~~ Comolehon Date -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / Protect N o DRC2003-01036 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ___ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Unrform Building Code and ~ / State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ___ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits _ _ _ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specrfic Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_ / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits __ _ Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding sc as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shati be for individual units with / / all receptacles shielded from public view --- 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identrfied in a clear and concise manner, ~_/ including proper illumination _ 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the /~ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions _ _ and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bwiding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 13 The protect contains a designated Point of Interest The site shall be developed and maintained _/_/ in accordance with DRC2004-00105 _ 14 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing SC-1-04 2 ~ ~ ~~ Prgect No DRC2003-07036 Comoleoon Date 15 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect penmeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad oimn ___/_/_ • t g property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's penmeter 16 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property Imes), rather than / / wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency _ _ _ 17 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood / / gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC _ ___ _ 18 For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 19 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as regwred by the Development Code _/~ 20 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space / / shall be provided _ _ _ 21 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as regwred by the Development Code _/_/_ 22 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured / / products _ _ _ D. Building Design 1 An alternative energy system ~s regwred to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and ~ / for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other attematrve energy systems are demonstrated to b f l _ _ • e o equiva ent capacity and efficiency All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating Details shall be included in the bwldmg plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 2 Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City / / Planner and Building Offiaal review and approval prior to issuance of building permits _ _ _ 3 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or / / protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and _ _ _ streets as requved by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwldmg design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldmg plans 4 For all residential development, provide condwt from each unrt/tot and a pull box to connect to the / / street Provide interior structured wrong for each house/bwldmg with minimum Category 5 _ _ _ copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the bwldmg, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of bwldmg permits E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts / / a bwldmg, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet _ _ _ wide 2 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided / / • throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ _ _ _ recreational uses SC-1-04 3 ~'~ I W~ F. Protect N o DRC2lH)3-01036 Completion Date 3 All parking spaces shall be double stnped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances / / , and exits shall be stnped per Cdy standards _ _ _ 4 All unds shall be provided with garage door openers d driveways are less than 18 feet in depth ~~ • from back of sidewalk 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on /~ this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking _ _ on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas 6 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho ~~ Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits _ For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _ _ _ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within ~ / the protect 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24-inch box or larger, _ _ 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 / / slope, shall be, at mwmum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion _ _ _ control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy . 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as _ _ _ follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, propertyowners are responsible for _/ / the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas _ _ within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertil¢ing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 6 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requred per the Development / / Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting _ _ _ 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in / / the requred landscape plans and shall be subtect to Cary Planner review and approval and _ _ _ coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Droision 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard • SC-1-04 4 / ~~~/ ~~ Project N o DRC2003-01036 Comoletion Date 9 Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the /~ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer _ _ • 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the / / design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division _ _ _ 11 Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of /~ Xeriscape as defined In Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code _ _ G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require _ _ _ separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominwm, ortown homes prior /~ to occupancy and shall requre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to _ issuance of building permits H. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation _ _ _ to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of / / the acoustical report were Implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior l l _ _ _ • noise eve s to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 3 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to _ _ _ past cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mtigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / / of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ _ _ mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements • 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ SC-1-04 5 ~-L/ 1~~ Prgect No DRC2003-01036 Comoletion Date Site/Plot Plan, Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Prolect Number (i.e., SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the prolect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Caltfomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential prolect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bemardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval L. New Structures Provide compliance with the Caltfomia Bwidtng Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Caltfomia Building Code for requred occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions -/_J ~~_ /_ _/-/ • _1_/_ _/ /_ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/_/_ SC-1-04 6 ~ ~ ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-07036 Completion Date 4 Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 _/_/_ 5 Prowde draft stops in attics in line with common walls ~~ 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance wdh CBC Table 5-A ~_/_ 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance wdh CBC Table 5-A _/~ 8 If the area of habdable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the / / construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum --- 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction _ _ M. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading /~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be to substantial _ conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualtfted engineer licensed by the State of California to / / pertorm such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualtfted engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding _/_/_ permits Additional Requirements/Comments 1 Protect shall fully comply wdh accessibility requirements of 2001 Califomia Building Code Chapter /~ 11A (Housing Accessibility) _ _ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment _ _ _ and maintenance, and public drainage facildies as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline) - - - 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard / / 33 total feet on San Bernardino Road _/_/_ 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point / / maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or _ _ _ deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map SC-1-04 7 ~ G `~~ Protect No DRC2003-01036 Completion Data P. 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qud-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to prowde a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, f uel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Straet Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights SVeet Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill8oulevard X X (c) X X X San Bernardino Road X X X X X X 4 Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) It so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer _/~_ _/ /_ _~_/_ -/~- _/-/ -~~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-1-04 8 T ~ ~./ \1Y1~ Protect No DRC2lx13-01036 ComoleUOn Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all comers of Intersections per Ciry Standards or as directed by the Ciry Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the Citys street tree program Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spaeing Slze Gty San Bernardino Road Lagerstrcemia indite Crape Myrtle Hybnd - 3 tt 20 h o c 24-inch 'Tuscarora' Pmk pox Foothill Boulevard Rhus lances African Sumac 5 h 20 tt o c 15-gal Non Activity Centers - Informal Pnmenly m R O W groupings not more than 25 % of total frontage trees STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR ON-SITE PLAN REFERENCE ONLY -NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS Foothill Boulevard Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 tt Spaces per 15-gal Non-ACtmty Centers - on-site plans On-site - 30 ft o c suggested This pnmary theme tree for Foothill must be behind the row per Caltrsns SC-1-04 l;Of15[rUCTIOn NOteS tOr S[reet I tees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ciry standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only -~ `W"~ ~~ ~_~_ ~-~. -~~_ -/_/ ~~ Prgect No DRC2003-01036 Completion Date 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance wilt adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all proles intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial of industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required ~. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwiding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adjacent areas S. Improvement Completion If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road T. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requrements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved ~_~. ~J- ~~ J_~. -~-~- _/___/ -/ /_ _/_/ -~-~- -~-~- SC-1-04 Protect No DRC2003-01036 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Dversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid forthe Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if . at least 50% of ali wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the fast bwlding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures W. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on ali sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used . 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices X. Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security Penang and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Y. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner Z. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . SEE ATTACHED J_~_ -~~ -/~- -/~- -~-~- -/~_ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-1-04 „ ,~-~ 1~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS February 3, 2004 Matn Street Route 66 J Laing Homes Tract 16567 N/S Foothill Blvd Between Hellman & Archibald DRC2003-01036 & SUBTT16567 MFR, SFR & Recreation Bmldmgs THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gmdelmes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelmes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m multi-fanuly res~denhal protects ~s 400- feet No portion of the extenor wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants m single-farmly residential protects is 500- feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet • from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet c Fire hydrants aze to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants aze 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or res~denhal protect from the public roadways 2 At mtersect~ons 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regmred by the Fire Safety Dw~s~on to meet operational needs of the Fire D~stnct 5 A rmmmum of forty-feet (40') from any building f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extenor of the facility or building, addmonal pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regmred fire Flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The regmred rmmmum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed ~s 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per squaze inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monrtonng This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow sublec[ to Fire D~stnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regmred fire flow ~-~ ~~ 3. Firewater plans are regmred for all protects that must extend the ex~sttng water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. • 4 On all site plans to be subrmtted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Pnor to subtmtttng plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall subrrut plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply p~pmg Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to subrruthng the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Dtstnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Cahforn~a Fire Code and the approved altemahve method # 05678 regmre an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed m accordance to NFPA 13-R & RCFPD Standard 10-5 section III-D: 1 Multi-farmly res~denhal structures m excess of 4 units 2 All structures that do not meet Fire D~stnct access requirements (see Fire Access) 3 When the building access does not meet the regmrements of the 2001 Califom~a Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lane Standard #F191 10 20 4 When any applicable code or standard regmres the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 The Cahfom~a Fire Code and the RCFPD Approved Altemahve Method regmres a Central Station Fire spnnkler Momtonng Fire Alann, based on the occupancy, lack of FD access and/or the number of spnnkler heads Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the approved altemahve method # 05678, the Cabfornia Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and the Cahfom~a Fire Code. 2 Pnor to installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building penmt must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire D~stnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated 5re lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15` story extenor wall shall be located within the limits of the approved altematwe method and site plan for Fire Distrct vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the extenor of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The mm~mum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet c The mm~mum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet d The mm~mum radins for cut-de-sacs ~s 45-feet e The mm~mum vemcal clearance ~s 14-feet, 6-inches f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side ~~~ ~~~ g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20% h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% ~ Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided m accordance wIIh the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed m accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device. The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed m accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exumg from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset 6 Fire Lane Identification Bed curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A sue plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: approved mitigation measures per the alternative method must be cleazly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is requred with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activuy or operation not specifically described below, which m the~udgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames m public assemblies • Public Assembly FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Mazshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submuted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation ~-C~ 1~\ 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regmred Fire Department access a. Is located on property which is not under the control of [he applicant; or b. Crosses a property line, or c. Is shazed by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distnct The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed wrthm the dedicated access without Fire Distnct approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemazdino To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the subitiittal: a. The cun•ent title reports to provide a legal descnption and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distnct access, the width, tum radii and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regmred pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or aze located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line, or c. Provide service to adjacent properties, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernazdino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall subrrut construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-srte combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standazds # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 4 ~ ~ 1`~2 All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing matenals to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a cleazance before lumber is dropped. . 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fird District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Subinittal Procedure Standazd # and #9-5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to dehvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4. Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtazmng the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernazdino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance wtth Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR • TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for lilting the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow m accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitonng system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egmpment is placed m service 6. Fire Alarm System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alann system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Constructi on Services 1 5 ~ ~ \~~ 7. Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehtculaz gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standazds #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Consttuctton Services 8. Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the tssuance of any Certtficate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Ftre Consttuctton Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provtstons that prohibit pazking, specify the method of enforcement and tdenttfies who is responsible for the required annual mspectwns and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-farruly dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbeis shall be displayed at the property entry 10. Address: Pnor to the tssuance of a Certtficate of Occupancy, cotnmerctal and mull[-farruly buildings shall post the address with rrummum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, vtstble from the street and electncally illurrunated dunng penods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illutninated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regmred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks mmulti-tenant commercial and industnal buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all Buttes. 11. Hazardous Materials Pnor to the tssuance of a Certtficate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m wntmg from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Rtsk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Ftre Department, Hazadous Matenals/BmergencyReBponse and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Servtces 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Dtstnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Infonnahon" form. This form provides contact tnfoimation for Fire Distnct use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property Thts form must be presented to the Fire Constiuction Sernces Inspector 13. Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the tssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site to accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all dewces and building features as regmred m the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector .,, Apnl 14, 2004 John Laing Homes Hand crated since 1848 Honorable Plamm~g Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re SUBTT 16567 and DRC2003 01036 Dear Comrmssloners ~,Ye~r John Laing Homes is proud to present our proposed new commumty to you for approval this evening We have one request -that the following final map conditions be modified, as shown below, to allow model homes to be exempted from the followmg "pnor to building permit" condittons Recnlnfinn 04-35c Engmeenng Condition Revised wordhn m italics 7 "Vacation of 2" Avenue, located north of Foothill Boulevard, shall be processed, (Sheet A-C 113) approved, and recorded pnor to approval of the final tract map or issuance of buildm ermits, exce t or model homes, whichever occurs fist " 13 "The final Tract Map SUBTT16567 shall be approved and recorded prior to Sheet A-C 113 issuance of buildm emits, exce t or model homes ('nmmumh Develnnment Denarfinent Standard Conditions: Condthon Revtsed wordm in italics C. Site "The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrtchons (CC&R's) and Articles of Development Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association aze subJect to the approval of the Condthon 4 Planning and Engmeenng Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded (Sheet A-C 128) concurrently wnh the Final Map or pnor to [he issuance of building perrm[s, except kC¢t-, model homes, whichever occurs first " F. "Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and Condithon 4a. shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Secunty shall be (Sheet A-C 130) posted pnor to final map approval or the issuance of burldmg permits, except for model homes, whichever occurs first " We thank you for your kind consideration of this request Sincerely, Rhonda Neely Senior Protect Manager i(.~- ~V 255 h ILncon Street Swte 100 Corona CA 92879/-13130 tel 909-272-5100 faz 909-738-9454 m~ww phnlamghomes coin T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE Apnl 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPSUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision for industnal condominwm purposes on 1 2 acre of land, in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN 0208-352-11 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987 - OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 16,448 square foot office budding on 1 2 acre of land in the Industrial Park Distnct (Subarea 7), located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN 0208-352-11 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Starbucks Coffee Shop, Chipotle Fast Food Restaurant, and Chinese Restaurant, Industnal Park (Subarea 7) South - Office Buildings (Industrial Park, Subarea 7) East - Vacant Land, Industrial Park (Subarea 7) West - Vacant Land, Industnal Park, (Subarea 7) B General Pian Desionations Protect Site -Industnal Park North - Industnal Park South - Industrial Park East - Industnal Park West - Industnal Park ITEMS D and I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16487 AND DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT April 14, 2004 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The site is presently vacant with non-natroe, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site. The site was rough graded with the remainder of the block several years ago Evidence of reoccurring disang for fire abatement purposes is evident To the north is a Kinko's copy service, a dental office budding, Starbuck's coffee shop, and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings, to the west is Buddy's Bistro Italian restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1.82 acre parcel The proposed project should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area, and is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site D Parkno Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Foota a Ratio Regwred Provided Office 16,448 (gross area) 1/250 N/A N/A Non-factorable Uses 3,361 N/A N/A TOTAL 13,087 (net area) 52 52 ANALYSIS. A General The site is surrounded by buildings of varying architectural styles and matenals The protect site is located within the Industnal Park Haven Overlay District, which staves for high employment density and a high level of architectural quality Site planning must incorporate elements of a pedestrian-oriented, campus-like setting with generous amounts of landscaping Paseos, esplanades and courtyards are highly encouraged The applicant is proposing to construct atwo-story, 16,448 square foot office building The project site has been designed with a covered, outdoor employee eating area that includes tables and benches. The building has strong articulation in all wall planes, includes five balconies and a courtyard at the entrance of the bwlding with a fountain The exterior matenals consist of plaster, red brick, and a decorative cornice. The vacant property to the west is concurrently being proposed for development of two office/medical buildings totaling 23,962 square feet (DRC2003-00988) B Parcel Map Concurrent with the Development Review application is Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487. The parcel map proposes the subdiwsion of air space for Industnal condominium purposes, which will allow indiwdual ownership of the units. C Design Review Committee The site, bwlding elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping were reviewed on January 20, 2004 The Committee (McPhail, Fletcher, and Fong) recommended that the project be revised and brought back for further review The Committee directed the applicant to pay particular attention to providing a pedestrian sidewalk that connects to other buildings, reconfiguring the "T" intersection, using brick material instead of stacked stone, and adding additional treatment to the wall plane at the south and west elevations where the large towers that house the stairwells are located Over the next D, Z 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16487 AND DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT • April 14, 2004 Page 3 several weeks, the applicant worked diligently with staff and rewsed the protect m response to the Committee's comments On March 2, 2004, the Committee reviewed the rewsed protect, and recommended approval, subtect to conditions of approval. The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval D Gradino Review Committee. The protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on January 20, 2004 The Committee recommended that the protect be rewsed, and return to the Grading Committee for further review On March 2, 2004, the Committee reviewed the revised protect and recommended approval, subtect to conditions The Committee's conditions of approval have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval E Technical Review Committee. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on January 20, 2004, and recommended approval subtect to the standard conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval F. Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant, and staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. The site is m an area identified as potential Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) habitat The previously rough graded site is within the Ontano Habitat Recovery Unit for the DSF as identified within the US Fish and Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSF, dated September 14, 1997 In January of . 2004, Ecological Saences performed a Habitat Suitability Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly Results of the survey indicated that the protect site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF because of: 1 Dominant coverage of invasive, non-native vegetation, and 2. Lack of native plant communities that are characteristic of a DSF habitat, with the exception of the presence of some scattered telegraph weed, and 3 Recurring exposure to an on-site weed abatement program (discing) that has prevented microhabitat sod conditions and native plant communities from developing, and Surrounding development has resulted in extensive fragmentation of potential DSF habitats in the site vianity, and There is no apparent connectivity to the subtect site from the nearest known DSF population (approximately 5 0 miles south of the site) Based on the conclusions of the habitat swtability evaluation as summarized above, it is concluded that DSF are not expected to occur on-site as characteristics necessary to support a viable habitat for an extant DSF population are absent Staff concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on • short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be m order Q, ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16487 AND DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 . Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 and Development Rewew DRC2003-00987 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. Respectful ubmitt , Brad Bu City Planner BB DG/tm Attachments• Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - • Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 Exhibit "E" - Floor Plans Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" - Design Rewew Agenda and Action Comments, dated March 2, 2004 Exhibit "I" - Initial Study Draft Resoluti on of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 Draft Resoluti on of Approval for Development Rewew DRC2003-00987 r1 LJ p~~~ ~,~,.. ~ --: -- ~ ~ , i I ~ ~~ ~I ~~ ~, -- _ _ I • •- , - ~ ~~ ~ „- 1 -~ - - - -- --- --- ---- - ~ .~ -- IR ! I i 1 1 '.J ~ a' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ` ~ ~ a9i _ ~ `1 / l ;I 1 ;:t` f ~ `~ -. " -I P• j,. \ J II ~ ~' _~`~ ~ ~ / ~ - ~ ~~ _~ \ ~ / - -~ ~t~ \ - ~ ~!`i- ~ ~ -~ ~„ ,fi; !i I ~I' . ,.~. ~~ '~~i~ 1 ;~, ~r _ ~.. , _ _ L_ I i ~ _ ~ _ .I I ~ w ` ~~~~I `I a~ 1 ~° 1 it I v _ _ '- 1 _ I I A' ~ ~''~i@I 'I ' t!"F 1~ ~ JI(~i-` ilk., Fi ii _. X81 r~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I i'S . ~ - s ~4 ,i ~~ I { ' ~~~ ~ i 71 ~j 1 i I , {j9+{ t 1 I I'i I 1 1 i l ~~ - - I I I ~ .I ~~ 'I ((I~~ _ ~~ I I I _ I I '-mil 1 {~ _ ~ I I I_-___~ _ ~>~» _ 1 t~ .1~ I I I I I '1 \ ~ 1 II 1 U ~ I 1 i I 1 I ...~ _ . - -. - 1 I I I I n , I - Imo- ~ I • ~ µ ^ ~ ~~ I I -- i •, n -- -- - -- , ; I I I I I I _ ~ ~J __ ~ _' I I _I 'EfiN"~=~ ~ ~ \ _ _ _ NOId 345 ' WD4 io arn a w ~ ra i ~ OI!l~101E oaIM IOB r a~+ ro~ i R rm / t i nteNB ~ c t ' t - t t t f ~ 4 ~ e 5 e t R •y: i ~ t ~ r ~ 3 _ ~ t)qa~ a~i ! ;t ;; ~p R ~ 3 ! ~{ r t r.. i i r = ~! r t ~ ~~~~~~4 i ~ ~ g 9 8 193 7 ~ ~1t~ ~ ( g ig ~( ~~~" ~l6~ !€6~ ;s{ ; ~ ! 3 ~ r ~ ,tlt ~ d ~Si~ ~~l~rtf ~ !i ; ; ~ + t ~ ~ ~ : ~~ ~ ` ! ! ~ i f ~F i t i r ~ ' ~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~ ~ s i9~46~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 6 ( ( y 1 C ( a + ( q i q y i ~ ~i 3 3 iif ~ 3 9 ~ ~ ~ `• ~ !!~y ~ ( { ~ ~ ~ fgli ! ~ it .... eS7711! i r n i Y 1 i . __ 3tIN31~V 3'JfRJdS ®~ ,j Y _--_ _ , --_--_ -~ --7 T ~ = _ ~ i.. ;,,; ------- - . -- ; ,II ~ i ., i ' ~ --- - _-_ - __ - I ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ a~~i 1, - 1 i 1 --~--• -- ~. , r -~~ ~ - ' // , ~ , -iiA ' JJ • / ~ h ~ ,e \` ~ i i i i i ~ ~ j ~ / ~ , ~ f~~-l rI•l ~ i i / i l ~% , ; 1 ~ / a ~ J ~,, x ., ;, `J • ~~ i Q cZ G J W ~a -. `~~ ~ ,~ -.~ ~ ~ Y .~'. 3 o.a I '~! -, ~r i ii I I • ! SI ~ V~ I w __________ __.__ ________ __ 133tl15 __ ___________ 3~IltldS _____ _ ___________ ______ ______I ~~ ii Q.. N -- i }-~-- li YB6 ~~ < _ ___________ ______________ _________-__ ______ __ -_ __________ ` ~ . n of ~ v i~ °w v~~ ~ ~L J~ ~ ~ i ~' J n 1 ~ i i ~ ~~ .I ~ • . ii i v i u ~ ~ ~ s _ ~ __ ~ i I ~ i n ice, _!,^~t ~~.i~ _~~_ ~~I~ ii i _1 i ~~ i I~-~i " ' , e ee _ ;' I ~ 1 0 ' N ,1'' I ep ~~ 1 ~ i lei, ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~~I ~ I i ~ I 1 1~• W 1 ~ :~ ' ~ J ~ ~ d c ` ` 1 ~ _ ~ C~ ' ! i ~ e 1 ~~ E~!~ ~ ~ ~~ l I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e l` @ r - -___ _ - - - i e N 8 ~ ~~ - _ n I ~ e e~ ~ 1 ~, 7 ~ ~ , _ _ __ _ - i~~SE _'__ _ _ Sv ~ ! ~~-~ G ~ _ '' r _ W, v ~ 4QW, ~1 /~ ~• a; I f ' r, _ -- r, ~~ ~ -_ _ ~1 _- ti ~ ey p Ep 3 ~[ ev t X h;e: V e 6 e }gyppe _~eSa Sf. F f i: i S. a a v E illl~~ll~l Ae 9rie. a 'e -3!e~c eli_e~ " o s3es•. ayee~ ~-e.!cEze31!!e~ w' :~_.~:e~ee:dc i; t~ i° s ~ `' ~ °`gp iE ,S V 4 8 <~ SS ~. i` i , brC! ~ i ?~ o; .~ ~ oii i F ~ i~ 1 ' ~ ia, 1 1 I is~ i v I I oq ~i m W.e E~ m;; iii dl jjf gPE E3 i ~ io ~t ' bl3 N I 6 I ~~ s !e G I I ~ <._ ~~ ~ 4i I u: i ~ ~ r ~ f ` f i I I 1 [S ~ ~ ~~ i; ~ 96 + ui W ~ I I 1 ~ 1 c ~ 111 i ~- I 1~ E, ~ "~ 0 Ag ~ ~ ~ , ~ ° ~ ~vi'~ k : i ` ~. _ ~ to .. i i \ [ ~~ O O iif ~ I \ * z" o ~ r~i ~t 1~ ii ~' q tl b „ p /~`~~ i` is / ~ 91 f v - ~ ~ i ii tr [X'l~ ,`1rJ',, /I // \' ~•~ 1 / \ `I•% ~„a a.~q4 , »A Ra eNnZi uu ~~)N iNM-j .TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 16487 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES PARCEL 1 Cf PARCEL MAP Np 11236 IN 1HE CITY (If RANCHO CUCUAMONGA COUNir O< SAN RERNARDINO STATE Of CALIFORNIA sS PER PLAT RECORpED IN BOOR Iii OF PARCEL MAPS PAGES 68-69 RECgtDS OF Sap COUNTY avlro u[.~PwuPl<..N,n/ Lf VCIMER [KlWnup u5E EONMC/PRCaVSEO u5E UnU11C5 ~ ~~r CROJECI pPiP PROJECT APN SEE PRCIMIHARY GRADING RPN fpi IOPVGRPPNIC REAIURES P BIAHxEt ORAINRQ >Np ACCf iS EPSENFHi WPS OEOICPI[p IV LNY L! RPNCNp CUCAMVNL4 PER PN IIE]fi PMB i]P/6869 YMm nnRe ov n mRt ~wui mrPnr RPRm Ru .A lNP[E mm Y ao a.. ma. ~( / ~~~~~ \/ OP,~ 41 ~8 14V1d UOOI! aa~+cxa ovrorioe raaw ~xuo m lSllj ~ ~ i ami ~~ \ 6 : c (~ `Y I .~ ~~ . b~ __ __ M e ___ _ ___ 3 . ~® , 1 m-__ -_-_ ~% _- F® r~ ~ 6 __-~ i 1 1 ~ -~ - -- ~ ~ - - -~- ~ \ - . - - - t ~~i 9® -= _.- 2 ~ ~ B i ® ~ ...,a. fJ1 _._1 --- - ~ ~.. s _ J F , A ~ ~® F ... . . ~ L d qq .i 3~ 'b ~r ;o _ 0 ~ aS 3 3 ; €~ ti~pp E 1 } 7 q rzs ! ~! a IS 7 i' 6~6 3yay/E ~ 3 3? t Elie 3 ~ ~ ~~ f ~, ~, z , e ~ `J • :o ~ +} 7 .. w • ~rivnve `~® w 1 -i ~ i - ~ ° tbt ~ 0 ~® E Q y 0 7 ®f ~ y .J. 1 , t [®~ _ ~ ` ~® u ~~ i o e P L _. _. ~. :, /$, ~g ei~ @r~S6:;lt! ~ d \\ sNOUrn3a ~oxaxa ....w. ~° ;...-.-.. ~... ~. cx~a~raa oUNMOB vao~ ~o r:o ®a i arni 9 ~ i j 1 e ~r; ~~s9i6~9 ~:r P~?i?~~~~lii!'~~4~ ~~H=~~ ~ ,`~ \2 ~\ ~-} Q d~ 9 ~~~~! ~ 1 ~~0~ .o°®~-oo :..: ~ E ~~, ~ ` ((f~t'~~i s ~~ I i~ ~~~ ( t L~ t ~ ° ( ~ t sj s (E t~( € it iili t}}}t}i 6 ~ j ~i (~~ y ~}~ 1 i ie ~ FI F FF ili F i iii I, et ~~~ ~~ ~~ n ~~=N~~ _,, `~~~~. ~ 00~®~~ ~~ ~ ~ ( ( ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !i ~ ~ ~ t 3~ f r d t S ¢~ t _ i ;, ~i ~.~AELMWFT WOY31'4 PLiN mmv ..wna w.nm.. 'r- ~ ~"' IAUREI-2EDOAK OASIS HOMES,INC ENVIRONS ,*1 R OFFICE BUILDWG uxosurc,un~mnurE 3r IUMtlNCAMJNfA [~ wum.uvc~u ~~.~ ~~ ^J DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.20 p m Donald Granger March 2, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industnal Condominium Purposes, in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street -APN 0208-352-11 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT -A request to construct a 16,448 square foot office building on 1.2 acres of land in the Industnal Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street -APN 0208-352-11 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Backoround On January 6, 2004, the Committee reviewed the protect and recommended that the protect be revised and brought back for further review The Committee directed the applicant )o pay particular attention to providing a pedestrian sidewalk that connects to other bwldings, reconfiguring the'T" intersection, using bnck material instead of stacked stone, and adding additional treatment to the wall plane at the south and west elevations where the large towers that house the stamvells are located The Committee requested that the protect return to the Design Review Committee as a regular item Desion Parameters The protect site is located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street The protect site is located within the Industnal Park Haven Overlay District, which strives for high employment density and a high level of architectural quality Site planning must incorporate elements of a pedestrian-oriented, campus-like setting with generous amounts of landscaping Paseos, esplanades, and courtyards are highly encouraged The applicant is proposing to construct atwo-story, 16,448 square foot office bwldmg The protect site has been designed with a covered, outdoor employee eating area that includes tables and benches The bwldmg has strong articulation in all wall planes, five balconies, and a courtyard at the entrance of the bwldmg with a fountain The two primary exterior materials consist of stucco and red bnck Horizontal fry reglets provide additional relief to the wall planes The vacant property to the west is concurrently being proposed for development of two office/medical bwldings totaling 23,762 square feet (DRC2003-00988) In response to the Design Review Committee's comments at the January 6, 2004, meeting, the applicant has revised the protect to include the following • A sidewalk along the south side of the main east-west drive aisle and along the west property line has been added • The north drive aisle opening has been shifted to the north, and the previous offset "T' intersection has been eliminated • The Landscape Plan has been upgraded with intensified plantings and additional color • The employee outdoor eating area is oriented to provide a logical connection to the bwldmg Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion ~ l\ ~rw~=T ``H~ tZ ~`"~ CLJ DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTPM16487 AND DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT March 2, 2004 Page 2 Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this pro/ect The application of bnck is cntical to the overall architectural concept The bnck should be modified to include the following The wood posts with a plaster finish at the balconies create an awkward transition from the bnck columns at the first floor The columns at the balconies on the second floor should be boxed out to match the supporting columns on the first floor Bnck should be added to the columns at the second floor balconies At the south elevation, the two isolated vertical bnck bands with the offset battered cap at the base should be redesigned to provide a logical connection with the rest of the budding The bnck band an-owpoints at the south and west elevations do not blend with the dominant bnck patterns on the building and should be eliminated 2 The two large elements that house the stairvvells at the south and west elevations are a departure from the form and the rooflme of the rest of the building They appear as "add-ons" because of their distinctly different appearance from the architecture of the building Their only purpose seems to be to allow a person to access the roof via stairs, rather than a roof hatch, which is very unusual fora 2-story bwlding The two towerelements should be lowered to be only slightly above the rooflme, and should be redesigned with a comics that matches • the rest of the building Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1 Large member lumber sizes (8-inch by 8-inch posts, 8-inch by 10-inch beams, and 2-inch by 6-inch lattice) and beams with decorative ends should be utilized at the employee outdoor eating area Posts should be placed on a 2-foot by 2-foot bnck base that is a minimum of 4 feet high in order to complement the budding design Colored concrete with score Imes should be used m the employee outdoor eating area 2 The courtyard at the primary entrance (north elevation) of the budding should be redesigned to include landscaping 3 Colored concrete or 24-inch by 24-inch scored concrete should be used in the first nine spaces in front of the buildings (carpool and handicap) and in the courtyard at the main entrance at the south elevation Colored/scored concrete will define the bwldmgs entrances and enhance the architecture of the budding Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area 2 All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc) shall be uniform • 3 The protect will regwre review and approval of a Uniform Sign Program Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the pro/ect be revised and return to Design Review Committee prior to being scheduled for Planning Commission DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTPM16487 AND DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT March 2, 2004 Page 3 , Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Cnstme McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Donald Granger At the meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mator and Secondary Issues raised by the Committee at its January 20, 2004, meeting The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval with the following conditions 1 The columns at the balconies on the second floor shall be boxed out to match the supporting columns on the first floor The boxed out columns shall extend to the bottom of the cornice Bnck should be added to the columns at all second floor balconies 2. At the south elevation, west of the exit, the center plaster columns shall be eliminated and the bnck recess shall be deepened to a depth of 12 inches. 3 The bnck band arrowpomts at the south and west elevations shall be eliminated 4 The two large elements that house the stainvelis at the south and west elevations shall be lowered to be only slightly above the roofline, and shall be redesigned with a two-tiered, cap that matches the rest of the building Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval , 5 Large member lumber sizes (8-inch by 8-inch posts, 8-inch by 10-inch beams, and 2-inch by 6-inch lattice) and beams with decorative ends shall be utilized at the employee outdoor eating area Posts shall be placed on a 2-foot by 2-foot bnck base that is a minimum of 4 feet high, and colored concrete with score lines shall be used m the employee outdoor eating area 6. The courtyard at the pnmary entrance (north elevation) of the building shall be redesigned to include landscaping Final design shall include large-size potted plants Colored concrete or 24-inch by 24-inch scored concrete shall be used m the first nine spaces m front of the buildings (carpool and handicap) and m the courtyard at the main entrance at the south elevation C • i ~~ Crty o! Aandro Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using Ink Use Planning Donsoon ~~ f~~_OO~~~ (909)477-2750 I' The purpose of this'foFrri~is,to_inform:t}e ,City,-,-~of~the_b ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) he tab key to move Irom one line to the next line.) SugT~llto~l~d~} ,. ,~,~-,= ~r - _, _ - sic~components'of the proposed ~' project so tfiaftfie.City may,review3heproject pursuant to`City;Folicies;O~dinances;tlarid:,: ~Guidehnes;= they Californiay~Envifoninentaj ~Quallty =Act, and~the~}City s~Rulesr~anda, Procedu`res~to==Implemerit`CEQA. _IirFl_s, important;ihatthe4informationr^requested'iri this' ',application be provided iii"fulls ~'~3,~,'`''„*.! $u~ r ~~ 3 ~,~ ;f,','~ ~'`' ~,~ ~3, r _ `. " %,=1'~ r• z,la7'pp qld , tr ror i ti it ' ~rdve ~ i ~, k r, ~~: ~} ~~ r~r 13~ iaA~d i~ re' r, ' . i ~ VM r~r,I ~ral'~,i is r+ - i Iv par al a~~n f ~ ~i Upon review ofr~ t~e,(compliaed Iniilaf,'S.tlUdyi;P,art I and the development application, , rt.~additional trifor'ma~tion~sich`as but~i'ot~ll~inited'to''trafflc- noise°~blolo/yicsl• dralna a ;and, } ro wy~ ,a ~ _f __ ! ~l riGF'.f rt~.r1' ~ , !, ,!}3f a cr.i7~,r i~~ i t ~t,~f r r . ,geolo ical•re~orfs.may,be9required.~The~proJect'application'will!not tieedeeme~ complete ,~ a „ 1 9 - ',.p :- _. r i .i r„ ~~ -z--_~_ ,°ra.. siFN(ti Y-C 4S' . ~ F.. , --a.~ _x-`.vs..s_ r,, it era^y.~i rSt-s ~ 9 ~_ ,uriless;tfie identified special stu_dies/repor~s~areysutimittedifor,review~and accep~ted'as~~ ;complete arid adequate =The protect application writ not be scFieduled,for-Committees 4 E :review ur9less'all'requfr`ed~repoi~ssare~suti~mlttedaand,,deemed complete_for~staff-to° ~, ~,pr`epare tF_ie-Initial~Study.,Fart.IlTasrequi'r`etl,tiy,'CEQA In~additionjfo;the filing fee;,the•;~ a licant willbe~res` onsttile'to a "'oft eimtiuse tfie=Ci ' lts~a erits,;;officers, and/orti'' ;~I pp ~ r~~, P,., m, ,,, p, ~!w, , ~ tY~. 9 ''co"'risultants fo~i'a~ll~;costs; for" 4he ip~,ep~a~ation,~ review, analysis~;~recommendations, ' ~~rriitlgations etc:~~of~ariy,specialstudies~orr~reports.-_ =q' ',r;tii°++;'~~~h~,;;;'~~;~;_ ~'~' Application Number for the protect to which this /onn pertains • ProlectTtfle Lk~~~~12En or~~ e~>=1c~ (:p~vIP~~X- Name 8 Address ofpro/ecl owner(s) lJi~itS CAMMF c~'1-1/~L bE~e~C(~M ~ I ~{2!~ ( N-~y>cl~ AJ~. `7iN7E 24G'I3~ ~tG-b Ly[Ahu~N'C~t, Gtr `~(7~i Name 8 Address of developer orprolect sponsor LAME l4s ~"~ ' I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORM1!S\COUNTER\EnvvonmentallnloFonn7 docPaye 1 ~ \~ \~ Rev fi/30/0~ INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbllrty o/the applicant to ensure that the app6cahon Is complete at the hme of submittal, Cdy stall wdl not be available to perlonn work required to provide missmg mlormahon Contact Person & Address tv y -~~ 1~ ~ ~PI l~f~f Name & Address of person prepanng this form (d different Irom above) ~~~ U71L~ p~lE - 5~ t T~ ~~7 ~lat~CrF D C~c.A M,tINCar E CFl ~rl~o Telephone Number Cgo9~ l`iT~~ l~2- 'i) Provide a Tull scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and md~cate the sde boundanes i 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the slfe /rom the north, south, east, and west, views into and /rom the site Irom the pnmary access points that serve the slfe, and representative views o/ s,gmticant /eafures Irom the sde Include a map showing location of each photograph i 3) Pro/ect Location (descnbe) ~ ~-~ d~- -~ f~ ~ ~ ~e~~,-~l (~~ J ~ L~~ ~. fy~ D • FZ ~D CftK p J E ~ tint p E,a s-, nF -Tt-tE ~+CCESS ~ Ar~Js~ t t ~I T Tn l au rz~t~ sr 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary) ~~0~ _ 7~.>~ _ ~ (_ 0 _ ~j~ '5) Gross Sde Area (ac/sq R) _("j2 / 272 5 ~ , ~- 7 - ~ !, Z A GPG 5) '6J Net Sde Area (total sde s¢e minus area o/ public streets & proposed A ~ q,~ ~ ~.r / (. C / ~ ~~~\ ded~cahons) `T (J l ~/ 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would aflect the protect sde (att~a/ch additional sheet d necessary) /y C/~ • fl,-~ ~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnvnonmenlallnfoForml docPage 2 Rev 6/30/03 Inlormat~on indicated by en astensk (') is not required o/non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by sfa8 8) Include a descnptron of all permits which wdl be necessary Irom the Crty o1 Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmenfal agencies rn order to fully implement the protect ~~iC~N 1=GNIEW ~~~APIriEt,4nle Y~'tLVING- ~Y~ 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as It exists before the protect mcludmg fn/ormaflon on topography, soil stebll~ty, plants end animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage crourses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (mcludmg age and condrtfon) and the use of the structures Attach photographs o/slgnrflranf /eafures descnbed In add~6on, crte all sources of information (i e , geological and/orhydrologlc studies, brotlc end archeological surveys, trethc studies) \I~GAr\IT (.AN~7 #~r~c-~r~b wlrtH o~f~inu~- M~as-~~.Hr( s N ~o f:XI ~~TI N ~ tr? f bs oN i1tE TAO PE2~'' 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o1 the site Cde all souroes of mformahon (books, published reports and oral history) I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\EnvnonmenlallnloForml docPage 3 Rev 6/30/03 11) Descnbeanyno~sesourcesandtherrlevelsfhatnowalfectthesrte(aircraft,roadwaynorse,etc)andhowfheywdla(lect proposed uses NONE ~ 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/act m detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnphon of the sde m farms o1 ultimate use that wtll result from the proposed protect Indreate tf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion o1 each increment Attach additional sheet(s) i( necessary ~ p~JE~-r I Nu.v~s 2 - rwt~ ~a~ Y q~~cE X111 ~ ol~c~s C,ONN~C1~ 7N~DUC~N ~ CaMNtti7N ~vlcd l.cP~y' ~ 1ZESi~bMS Any? ~~77G~1. G1 PGU1,1kT1 nl~ WHIC1-} lNGLUD~S RN E~~ilh'>~ • ~L-L !s DWG 7?~ ~iE SUUI LT I r( ahl E `~PSr/ ~~ b rrr~ ~'P--~~C-~T I ~X~T(r7 TD [3E CgMI~i.E7~ At~X(M~-4' IN 5~Ca MnNrNs A'F"fC'[Z i'e~N11~ A7.E ISSUI/D . 13) Descdbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals end any cultural, histortcal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroial, etc), Intensify of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and stele of development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) ~At~.G~l, 1~ `~,~oUN[7ED ~Jti jitE r~Cf2-Ti{ P6~ ~"WO lkt/G(,GPEb PRGFi/t~1i3 ~17N ~T1+yt24~nt(~~(1ri I,oFFe~'' fti ~ ~ CN 1"Hf CflX ~ rTLK~ iS A /r~Cl~ti' i t'~2~~(. , n/~ 'i h f ~~0\r(N /~~'TEfi wEst i ~ >~~N~ ~ L n~~c,~ y~•, ANy ~~~ 9~ g u~ - ptl\I D ON Tt{~ 4v C/T A }`0>~\~~ f1 a-~>S ptJ A t, ND~~r; ~C~PEY7 ~~CEi. 14) Wdl the proposed pro/act change ilia palfem, scale, or character o1 the surrounding general area o/the prolect~ Z I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnvlronmentallnloForml docPage 4 Rev 6!30!03 i 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source andamount How will these noise levels aflect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproolmg are proposed '18) Ind~cafe proposed removals and/or replacements olmature orscenic trees. 17J Ind~cale any bodes of water (mcludrng domesbc watersupplres) into which the sae drains 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For lurther clanfica[ion, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) b Commeroial/Ind (gaUday/acJ li /~ Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) ~~~ ~ 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank Sewer 11 septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests ll discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed rndreate expecteddeilysewagegeneretron (SeeAttachmentAlorusageestimatesJ For lurthercladfica6on,pleasecontactthe Cucamonga County Water Distnct et 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) b CommemiaUlndustnal(gaUday/ac) ~d'~~~~L~ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20J Number of residential unds Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot srze Attached (indicate whether units are rental or /or sale units) I \PLANNIN(i\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\EnvvonmeniallnloFotml docPage 5 Rev 6/30/03 21) Anhapafed range of sale pnces and/or rents ~/~ Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ I . Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Speaty number of bedrooms by unit type ~(f/{ ' 23) lnd~cate anbc~pated household slze by unit type f~/~ i 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be restdmg wdhm the pmlect Contact the appropnate, School Drsfncts as shown mAttachment B /~//~ i a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High _ COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 251 Descnbe type of use(s) and major lunchon(s) of commercial, mdustnal or msbtuhonal uses C7EnlE~- ~rICE 28) Total floor area of commeraal, mdustnal, or mshtuttonal uses by type ~~, t~.[F~ ~~ , FT 27) Ind~cafe hours of operation ~ ~l~ ~ Lj ~ ^~ , 28) Number of employees Total (~P/ KND bL/) Maximum ShtR /~ Time of Maximum ShtR -) \ Z 22 11PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnwronmentallnloForml docPage 6 Rev 6/30/03 29) Provide breakdown of anhcrpated/ob classrficahons, including wage end salary ranges, as well as an mdicahon o/ihe rate of hire for each classrficahon (attach additional sheet 11 necessary) • UA1Kl~IDINnI 30) Eshmahon oI the number o! worlrer; to be hued that currently reside In the Ctty ~rN KNO y,rn/ '31) For commercial and rndustnal uses only, lnd~cate the source, type, and amount of air polluGOn emissions (Data should be ven8ed through the South (:oast Arr Oual~ty Management Dlstnct, al (818) 572-6283) No~~ ALL PROJECTS . 32) Have the water, sewer, /tie, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine then ability to provide adequate service to the proposed prolect7 ll so, please tnd~cate their response KO 33) In the known history o/thts property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioaclrve substances, pesticides and herbrctdes,luels,otls,solvents, and other8ammablel~qutdsandgases Also note underground storageolanyoltheabove Plsese list the matenals and descnbe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dales o/use, tl known rJaJ~ ~ti~ Z~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnvnonmentallnfoForml docPage 7 Rev fy'30/03 34) Wdllheproposedprolectrnvolvethetemporaryorlong-term use,storage, ord~schargeolhazardousand/ortoz~cmatenals, rncludmg but not limited fc those examples Irsted above? 1(yes, provide an inventory o(all such mafenals to be used and proposed method o/disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and . labeled on the application plans NG 1 hereby certrly (hat the statements fumrshed above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and inlormahon required for adequate evaluahon of this protect to the best of my ability, thatthe /acts, statements, and rnlormahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge end belief I further understand that add~flonal in/ormahon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluahon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date' f~- 7-03 • {~ ,Z 2u I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\EnvtronmenlallnfoForml docPage 8 Rev 6/30/03 nue. cc-~ TOPO~ map punted on OB/01/03 from "California tpo" and "Untltled tpg" 000' W 117°35000' W WGS(34117°34000' W ~' . L V` ('`V _ * i ~_ ~ t~ ±Y~Sa~ \ _NUV54[Md .iF- l _tiy~ - ~ _ _ ~ ~_~-.i~'~~=_ ~. '+.V^ ~' \ _ / _ _ •• _ ufam ' ~ r ~ ~° _ _ _ __ j~~ v - ~_ _~_ a'1@6 tot - ~ ~ -~ .. __ - __ - _________ ___ -_- _ _____ - _'_S___-_-__ ~' J - __ ...__ _.. - '~ i'~- _ __ -_`_ - _ ____ __ _ __- _ ______ _ _ • - ~ _~-~I . - .:.i .... -' A ERA = a __ -~ - ~\ ~_.-?:.a:: _ - - Rw.o~ _ ~ + _ _ _ _-~ _ _ _ -vim- '- ~r:. -8F _ :- ° _ - -- - ---- wen -_I` .'- - - - -._.._ _.-~ _ ~}_ -.r::~.q:-_ ~ o N ,1. ~ _ _ - ..~ - _ '-cif -_ _ _~~ - - - -f 'w`~-. ~_y-~-- u_Y-'. ~'---'c _ = N B. l a _ X __ 1 a I _ + _, - _- a v_ ~ -~ -i _ _ _ _ _ _~Yt __ +_~__9.~v - _-'.--P v ~ W nk ' ! • WSIF _- - `4 - _ _ _ - I ONTAl1In~--- ~ _ _ _ -- ___ 'T-_ _ nnUNOA kn ~M1. ~` - - -i'- iii `_ _ -- =wn.~_.._ ern c a, ~ _ ~ ~ akem .~. I c-~ ~~ ~I 'y~~'~'<', RIQ .MOT~e •' DWM 1~ _ ~ 11 '•. 1' ~ ~ - ((" - _ • TaQ' ~..-~ ~ =s • we ~ le -- o 117°36 000' W 117°36 000' W WG584 117°34 000' W TN hiN B s i FntE V 13Y• ~nnU FEEL 0 ~0 1000 MFTFnS Ported form TOPOi 02001 Nehmml Oe°papl°c N° (aawt°p° 1~ ~ 1 ~.. ?i ' ~, ~ ~. ._ _ . C ' S. ~ .. ..._ ~.~~+.. .. u* , V .. ,~ ~ _ n ' ~ ~ S _ .. o . ~ iii.. .,G :7 : -.T': .. .. ' _ ~. ~.: _ ~ R II -I I II -I I a J ~ ihl it s fa ~... i ~~~ .~r~ n ~ ~ ~ m Y N ~ f ~r `i ~~l > ar. n~. Y ~ rI'h '. t J v~ e t ~.e~ ~E.F~iv '` r ~ ~ ~, i r ~4+.~~c~~4 y~~ r]~,~.yl~~""~y~ ~.,. %~`fcry X: t~ r 1 ~?y ~+3~ .r.~~'iY jam '4- ~ y~y,'?~~ ~ W~ ~ ~~3 ~ ~ ~ . 7 t~ sTti`~'. ~ • ~~ '.~T} ~ ~.~ -fir l:;' T G^ + as .w ~~ , ~ ;v'FCr ,1 c'v7 ., '+ . ..-,.... a I II I I II ~ I I l • 1 ~ g~R~,~2,~0~03`~~~8} LOCATION MAP '.I ~~~, ~~ ~ ~~ ,~;, ~i ~ a 19 ~, _, ~ ,, ;i, ~ _ ~i E- .~!_,- ~ I,I i' j ~, ~ %;. ~ i i ~ I ~ ~ ' _, ~ + ~ `~ ~ ', \ ,~ . ~~) ~j ~, -~ ~ •, ~ _~ !~ _ ~_ --- a° ~ r ,,;, ~~' -_ lil. ----~-- L _r'` ' II,-- _1_ , _ F ,~ ~ , ~ - ~ ~ - ~ l ~ ' ~~ -- I ~ ~~ l - - : ;; 1 _ ._ _ ~ , ~ I,- ~- jj j~~mnm h°P'~_I ~ ~_ ~_ ~_ ~ _ ~' ~ ~ - ~ 1 - ~~ - -- -)~ -- - ~-~ -~ - - -- ~ -- ~ r I: T C i 1~ r-? .j - ( ~ ~ ~ r , . r~ u N W E S 0.4 0 0.4 0.8 Mlles BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Flle: Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, Development Review DRC2003-00988, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPMt 6488 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominium purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN. 0208-352-11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct a 16,448 square foot office building on 1 2 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN 0208-352-11 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16488 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request for a single parcel subdivision for Industrial Condominwm purposes, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north side of Laurel Street, west of Red Oak Avenue - APN 0208-352-91 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00988 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - A request to construct two buildings totaling 23,762 square feet consisting of office, medical and retail use on 2 27 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north side of Laurel Street, west of Red Oak Avenue - APN 0208-352-91 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Oasis Commeraal Development 9267 Haven Avenue, Suite 2406 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. 2onmg. Industrial Park (Subarea 7) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The two properties combine into a 3 47 acre protect site (hereinafter referred to as °the site" or the "rough-graded site°) The site is located at the northwest corner of Laurel Street and Red Oak Avenue, and continues west on the north side of Laurel Street for approximately 690 feet The site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matonty of the site The site was rough graded with the remainder of the block many years ago Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evident To the north are a Kinko's copy service, a dental office budding, Starbuck's coffee shop and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings To the west is Buddy's Bistro Italian restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1 62 acre parcel The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses m the area and is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site 8. Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D , ~ 2~ r-1 U C~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, Development Review DRC2003-00988, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 70. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: \_J EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Av Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Signirficant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or'Less Than Signficant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Guttural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ORecreation (/) Mandatory Findings of (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils (/) Land Use/Planning () Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION witl be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed prctect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a °Potentially Significant Impact° or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed D,z. 2°~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, Development Ro~~~~w DR 2004-00988 and Tentative Parcel Man SuBTPM16488 Page 3 () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significart effect on the environment, • because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoid~d or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is requued Prepared By - Date January 22, 2004 ~~~ Reviewed By ~~~ Date • ~7~.J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 4 Lees men $iprehCenl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pine^^e~~r siy~ncem wen Auuvenon men 3ipnficent No I aC Into IBD I ect I act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS. Would the prolect , a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic butldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) or duality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buldings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Laurel Street and Red Oak Avenue, and continues west on the north side of Laurel Street for approximately 690 feet The rough- graded site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evident To the north is a Kinko's copy service, a dental office building, Starbuck's coffee shop and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings To the west is Buddy's Bistro Italian restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1 82 acre parcel The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design rewew is regwred prior to approval City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site ~s currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which regwre rewew for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses Q ,z 3\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 5 Less men Spruficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Faenually 9prvficenl wnn wfipeueo Tnan s~pnfiaem No I n Intro retatl I n I n b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or () () () (/) a Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the northwest corner of Laurel Street and Red Oak Avenue, and continues west on the north side of Laurel Street for approximately 690 feet The site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matority of the site Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evdent To the north is a Kinko's copy service, a dental office building, Starbuck's coffee shop and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings To the west is a sit-down restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1 82 acre parcel There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Wiliiamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the northwest comer of Laurel Street and Red Oak Avenue, and continues west on the north side of Laurel Street for approximately 690 feet The site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matority of the site Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evident To the north is a Kinko's copy service, a dental office building, Starbuck's coffee shop and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings To the west is a sit-down restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1 82 acre parcel The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles southwest of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O O (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation p,= ~Z Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 6 Lau roan S,tlafitant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Polentlally 9gnhcant won Mmpatlon roan S,pnifirRnt No I Inca tad I azn I c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCA~MD) as well as City Planning Staff. • 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. Diz~a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 7 Les., men Signihcanf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Foteneally Sign,hcant wnn Miegeeon teen S,gni6canf No 1 ect Into retetl I ect I 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if gilt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 8) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water ~uallty Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce PM~q emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~q emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,q would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented D ,Z.~`~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 8 • Less Then SIpNhCala Les Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Poremlally 9prvhranl WM Mltlpaeon Than 9pnlficant No I Into Ie0 I 1 acl 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All ,residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR . identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts ii they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Within a 1/4 mile south of the site is a hospital, which provides emergency services Within a 1/4 mile east of the site is a Best Western Heritage Inn Hotel The office and retail uses are not expected to generate toxic air contaminants Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures . listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the office and retail uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated D ,~ "~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 9 Lass marl SiOn'ftant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Prnam~any $ignihcanl wnn Mmpaoon may $IpNhcdlll No ~ act Inca re~eE ~ act ~ ecl 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () (/) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlde Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, i marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with office and retail uses The rough-graded site has been previously disrupted during the construction of surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) habitats as identified by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (1997) In January of 2004, Ecological Sciences performed a Habitat Suitability Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly • Results of the survey indicated that the prolect site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF due to 1) dominant coverage of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) lack of native plant communities that are characteristic of a DSF habitat, with the exception of the presence of • some scattered telegraph weed, 3) recurring exposure to an on-site weed abatement program (discing) that have prevented microhabitat soil conditions and native plant communities from developing, 4) surrounding development has resulted in extensive ~ ~ ~ n~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 10 Les3 Than Sprvfrosnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,a~,n°~;,; ,,,,,,~,~, s,~ ~„ No ~ a Into tae ~ I fragmentation of potential DSF habitats in the site vicinity, and 5) there is no apparent connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known DSF population (approximately 5 0 miles south of the site) Based on the conclusions of the habitat swtability evaluation as summarized above, it is concluded that DSF are not expected to occur onsite as characteristics necessary to support a viable habitat for an extant DSF population are absent Open, sandy areas more commonly associated with DSF habitat are absent on the project site Long-standing surtace disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development activities ~ have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Recurring soil disruptions may also preclude potentially suitable DSF microhabitat soil conditions from developing and likely inhibit the growth of native Delhi plant communities Absent preventing recurring anthropogenic site disturbances, the establishment of a viable DSF would likely be precluded As such, occurrence potential for DSF would therefore be considered low Also, the subject site would not likely be considered and essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commeraal and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adjacent to the site b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the project will not have any impacts . c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage or mature trees on the project site, therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change m the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O (/) O ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those O O O (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries 'Q ,~ ~`~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 11 Less Than Sipruficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Po,a""a~'Y Sipruficant wnn Mnipaaon Than Siprvficant No ~ Incro ea ~ Comments: a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl• r1 LJ • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. i • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or . focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring ~s appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: t y Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 12 ~ m~ ssr~~m ~ss Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 aaa"°~"Y svmecam wnn ~woeaan "'°" aorv~~ No ~ ~~o ~ i n i Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleareii or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mmes and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) nQ Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the prolect, and potentially result m on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater ~~Z ~ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 13 Less 7nan Sipruficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pmem~allr Sipnficant wnn M2paoon Tnan Sipmhcanl I No I act Into teE I n en Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and rt is not in an Earthquake Fautt Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga Ciry Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes approximately 1 25 miles north of the site, apd the Cucamonga Fault Zane Iles approximately 3 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„. 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 13 5 miles northeasterly of the sRe and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code wail ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project undgr the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels r~ u 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~p emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RW~CB]) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~p emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Fine Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Fine Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils typically have very slow runoff, and the hazard of soil blowing is moderate Delhi fine Sand can be nearly level to strongly sloping The project site • has gentle grades in southerly direction No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater di`sp`osal is proposed 1~ ~-'1~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 14 i ~,~ Sipnficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~~o~i M. ~oo~ so ~„ Ne i ins ~~ i i 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the protect ~) ~) ~) (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ~) ~) () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the enwronment~ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ~) () ~) ~/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be~located on a site which is included on a list of ~) ~) ~) ~/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the enwronment~ e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () ~) ~) ~/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O ~) ~) ~/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with ~) () ~) ~/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ~) ~) ~) ~/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wiidlands~ Comments. a) The protect, consisting of office, medical and retail uses, will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential far significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected . b) The proposed protect, consisting of office, medical and retail uses, does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Dmsion that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies D~~`~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 15 Less 71ian Sipn,hcam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 'ot8n081y s~pmrram won rtupeoon m'" $,yn~ficant No ~ loco tetl I act I n Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticpated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 6 miles of the nearest existing (Coyote Canyon Elementary) or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed offx:e, retail and med~cai office protect is not I~sted as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 mites of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Avport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticpated , f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Avport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated u g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies • and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fue hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () () () (/) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit m aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site • fl,~ ~2 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page i6 Less man s~m~fieam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 vine"sally 90nihcent vino MNpsson man SiOrvficam No 1 IncO ed I I d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result ' in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff i) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCW D has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A -J~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 17 Less man SiOnificent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fa~an~ialiy spnecam wnn hLUpeoon man S,pruf~cant No ~ el Into rata0 ~ C ~ %1 grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the a9nount of new bulding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Offical and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or oft-site No impacts are antiapated e) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are antiapated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution A Water Quality Management Plan was prepared by Goodman 8 Associates and concluded that the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) Storm Drain Signage (ID number SD-13) shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check 3) Medla Filters or (number MP-40) or Drain Inserts (MP-52) shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check. 4) The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall include "Fact Sheets" from the Caltforma Stormwater BMP Handbook. 5) The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall indicate m the Site Description that the project is m the Upper Santa Ana River watershed and that known problems include the following contaminates: salinity, total dissolved solids, nutrients, pathogens and chlorides. 6) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected 0 ,T `a'~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 18 ~-1 LJ Less Than Sprvficant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 vaemialiy 9pruficant won wapaoon loan Siprvficant No ~ n ~~ ~~ ~ ~ h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensroe 'storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected t) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sds at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community O O U (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () (/) ( ) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located at the northwest corner of Laurel Street and Red Oak Avenue, and continues west on the north side of Laurel Street for approximately 690 feet The site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matonty of the site Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evident To the north is a Kinko's copy service, a dental office building, Starbuck's coffee shop and Chipotle fast-food restaurant To the south, across Laurel Street, are several office/professional buildings To the west is a sit-down restaurant, and to the east is a vacant 1 82 acre parcel This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding development to the north, west and east The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Industrial Park The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated • c) The protect site is located in an area developed with office and retail uses The rough-graded site has been previously disrupted during the construction of surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources fl ,-~ u~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 19 Less Then S,prufitaM Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g ao~enaelly Si~vficant vim, MnipaOOn Than Siprvficent I No I n Inm taa ~ n C The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Umt for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) habitats as identified by the US Fish & Wddiife Service (1997) In January of 2004, Ecological Sciences performed a Habitat Swtability Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly Results of the survey indicated that the prolbct site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF due to 1) dominant coverage of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) lack of native plant communities that are characteristic of a DSF habitat, with the exception of the presence of some scattered telegraph weed; 3) reoccurring exposure to an on-site weed abatement program (discmg) that have prevented microhabitat soil conditions and native plant communities from developing, 4) surrounding development has resulted in extensive fragmentation of potential DSF habitats in the site viamty, and 5) there is no apparent connectivity to the sublect site from the nearest known DSF population (approximately 5 0 miles south of the site) Based on the conclusions of the habitat swtability evaluation as summarized above, d is concluded that DSF are not expected to occur onsite as characteristics necessary to support a viable habitat for an extant DSF population are absent Open, sandy areas more commonly associated with DSF habitat are absent on the protect site Long-standing surface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development actmties have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Recurring soil disruptions may also preclude potentially sutable DSF microhabitat soil condtions from developing and likely inhibit the growth of natroe Delhi plant communities Absent preventing recurring anthropogemc site disturbances, the establishment of a viable DSF would likely be precluded As such, occurrence potential for DSF would therefore be considered low Also, the sublect site would not likely be considered and essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commercial and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adjacent to the site 70. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result in the loss of avaiability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact D,~ ~~ LJ J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 20 Lass roan 9gnificent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Y s~,q,^fi4cenj M petlp~ yyufican~ No i i~ ~ ~ i 11. NOISE. Would the protect result m a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () (/) () ( ) levels in excess of standards established in the ' local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an arport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public arport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect wdhm the vicinity of a private avstnp, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The protect site will be subtect to 65dBA noise levels within 368 feet of Foothill Boulevard However, the City's Development Code requires that all industrial, commercial and office uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy- duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. C~ 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted p~~`~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 21 Less Than $ipnfcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Poteneaily SiQrvficant WM MNgaoon Then 9pnacarn No 1 act Into rate0 I I act The preceding mitigation measures well reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential Impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mltlgatlon measures shall then be required 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not Induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect • d) See a) response above • e) The site Is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No Impact Is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other Infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located In a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the • employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated ~ \Z ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 22 L_ J lass Than 9pnihnun Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~'ry'~~I; g µwrtn pabon Than Siproficant No I an I tad I an I act b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provision o/ new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, rn order fo maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection b) Police protecUOn~ O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments: a) The site, located on the north side of Laurel Street, west of Red Oak Avenue, would be served by a fire station located less than 1 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract The prolect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Mtlliken Park, is located approximately 6 miles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the • construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the ~ ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 23 Less marl Siprvbcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Folemially sip,vfieam wnn Mnipabon Tnen Siprvbcem No I ect Into tetl I C I acl cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse I physical effect on the environment Comments- I a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ The nearest park, Milliken Park, is located approximately 6 miles from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/1'RAFFIC. Would the prolect. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () " () (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) \~ `~ - Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 24 Less marl Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP fd Potemielly $ipruficent win /Mipebon m," spnhcent , h» I sc! Inco tetl I acl 1 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated I b) A two-way, a m and p m peak hour trip generation analysis was completed for the protect The protect is forecasted to generate 38 two-way a m peak hour non-retail trips, and 23 two- way a m peak hour retail trips The protect is forecasted to generate 49 two-way p m peak hour non-retail trips, and 80 two-way p m peak hour retail trips Trip generation calculations were based on the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model Aland use designation of Community Commercial was used to calculate the two-way peak trips for retail use since the protect has access to Foothill Boulevard, a mator commercial corridor Additionally, directly across the protect site is a shopping center, which is zoned Community Commercial Since the protect will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail use, and less than 1,000 two-way peak hour trips for retail land use, the protect is well below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated • f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated D, z S\ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 25 ~, mar. S,pruficant °.' Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 `°'QMi81y seror~m "'"" A4opaco~ m~ s~m,~e~i No ~ ~ ~~ ,~ i i g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Reqwre or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sigrnficant environmental effects c) Reqwre or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, nether of which are at capacity The protect is regwred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated ~1 LJ c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and • City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario and n ,~ SZ i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 26 I Less Than SiOniUCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pma^^=I~r Significant wan M~upebon man SiBn~ficant No 1 act Intro tetl I act I n Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current dally water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent The proposed protect would include the con§truction/operation of one office building and two office/medicaVretail buildings totaling 40,210 square feet Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221, and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CCWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilities Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated , e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which . are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated L 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () (/) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly ~) ; = S~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 27 Less Than Sigmhcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially SigmiKent wnn Mibpabon Tnan Siprufirant No I Inm retetl I I as Comments. a) The protect site is located in an area developed with office and retail uses The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources. The previously rough graded site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) habitats as identified by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (1997) In January of 2004, Ecological Sciences performed a Habitat Suitability Evaluation for the site to evaluate potential habitat to support the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly Results of the survey indicated that the protect site does not provide optimal habitat for DSF due to 1) dominant coverage of invasive, non-native vegetation, 2) lack of native plant communities that are characteristic of a DSF habitat, with the exception of the presence of some scattered telegraph weed, 3) recurring exposure to an on-site weed abatement program (discing) that have prevented microhabitat soil conditions and native plant communities from developing, 4) surrounding development has resulted in extensive fragmentation of potential DSF habitats in the site vicinity, and 5) there is no apparent connectivrty to the subtect site from the nearest known DSF population (approximately 5 0 miles south of the site) Based on the conclusions of the habitat suitability evaluation as summarized above, it is • concluded that DSF are not expected to occur onsite as characteristics necessary to support a viable habitat for an extant DSF population are absent Open, sandy areas more commonly associated with DSF habitat are absent on the protect site Long-standing surface disturbances, such as exposure to recurring weed abatement and other development activities have substantial negative impacts on potential DSF habitat Recurring soil disruptions may also preclude potentially suitable DSF microhabitat soil conditions from developing and likely inhibit the growth of native Delhi plant communities Absent preventing recurring anthropogenic site disturbances, the establishment of a viable DSF would likely be precluded As such, occurrence potential for DSF would therefore be considered low Also, the subtect site would not likely be considered and essential or viable property for preservation or restoration due to its geographic location, surrounding commercial and office developments, and overall absence of suitable habitat on or adtacent to the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing • mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required fl,-~ ~a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 28 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study idenrtifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from au quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study wdl ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (/) Habitat Swtability Evaluation, Ecological Sciences (January 4, 2004) (/) Water Quality Management Plan, (Goodman & Associates, December, 2003) p;~s~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, and SUBTPM16488 Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the prolect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the prolect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature i - ~ Date• 2-'3~ ~5~ Print Name and Title ~~/ °- ~i ~ [ ' D ,Z 5~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 and Development Review DRC2003-00987 Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988 Public Review Period Closes• Apnl 14, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Oasis Commercial Development Project Location (also see attached map)• Located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street - APN 0208-352-11 Project Description: A request to subdivide 1 2 acre of land for a single parcel subdivision for indystrial condominium purposes and to construct a 16,448 square foot office budding within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) ' FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment • If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required Reasons to support this fmdmg are included m the attached Initial Study The project fde and all related documents are available for review at the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod Aonl 14 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By fl,~ `~~ RESOLUTION NO 04-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16487, A SUBDIVISION OF 1 2 ACRE OF LAND FOR OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK AVENUE AND LAUREL STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-352-11 A Recitals 1 Oasis Commeraal Development filed an application forthe approval of Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentatwe Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speufically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reatals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on April 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together v~nth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a 1 2 acre property, located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street, and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north of the subtect site are developed with a restaurant, coffee shop and fast food restaurant, and are zoned Industnal Park, the property to the south is vacant and is zoned Industnal Park, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Industnal Park, the property to west is vacant and presently has an application filed for the development of two office bwldings, and The application proposes the subdiwsion of air space for Office Condominium purposes, and d The application, in contunction Huth Development Review DRC2003-00987, proposes the development of an office building, and • e The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Q ,~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT April 14, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng) the above-referenced public heanng and upon the spec findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 7 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That the tentative parcel map is consistent month the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map vwll not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the fads and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for • the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the probed will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative peGaretion and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaretion has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Ad (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaretion and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative pecaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that anll result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations . D,-s~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every cond~Uon setforth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Approval is for the subdivision of air space for office condommwm purposes fora 16,448 square foot budding 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Development Review DRC2003-00987 shall apply Enaineenno Dwision 1) Incorporate dram inserts, a Best Management Practice (BMP), (ID number MP-52) into the design and identify them on the Conceptual Grading Plan Storm drain signage (number SD-13) shall also be installed 2) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be addressed in the project Covenants, Conditions, and • Restnctions (CC&Rs) 3) The parkway, from one-foot behind the sidewalk to the top of curb, shall slope downward at a two percent grade 4) Retaining walls, inGuding their footings, shall not cross property Imes unless evidence of permission from the neighbonng owners is provided 5) Pnor to the issuance of budding permits, a Dnrers~on Deposit and related admirnstrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rfat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division when the first budding pertrnt application is submitted to Bwiding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division v~nthin 60 days follo~nnng the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Environmental Mitigation Air Qualty 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Q ~~ (n0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 4 - 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading perrrnts, the developer shall submil construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment well be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Qualty Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Plannrng`staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted rn SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follownng provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or appty gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule actrwt~es to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance ~nnth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City rf silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible D ,~. ~\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 5 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All mdustnal and commercal facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of ten minutes) 11) All mdustnal and commercial fatalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters d t 15) o All residential and commercial structures shall be require incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspetaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdehnes . Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, D,=lot PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 month onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrucUon field survey of the proled site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wall also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigafton measures (i a ,paleontological momtonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the follownng measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils month minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found wnthin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speumens month a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sor/s 1) The site shall be treated month water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality IL J 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins D,z ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 . Page 7 2) Storm Dram Signage (ID number SD-13) shall be indicated on the preGSe Grading Plan submitted for plan check 3) Media Filters or (number MP-40) or Drain Inserts (MP-52) shall be indicated on the preGSe Grading Plan submitted for plan check 4) The preGSe Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall include "Fact Sheets" from the California Stortnwater BMP Handbook 5) The grease Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall indicate m the Site Descnption that the project is in the Upper Santa Ana River watershed and that known problems include the following contaminates salinity, total dissolved solids, nutnents, pathogens, and chlondes 6) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply ~nnth obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Store Water Pernit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construcbon Pernd • Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance v~nth above noise standards or halted 3) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily legs (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings fl ,~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-37 SUBTPM16487 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page B The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chaurnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the follovwng vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~ ,Z l.oS City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00987, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487, Development Review DRC2003-00988, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect fde with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ ,~ lr~.o DRC2003-00987, SUBTPM16487, DRC2003-00988, AND SUBTPM16488 OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigy~ion activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. '' 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unantiapated circumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indwidual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The momtoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00987 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPMi6487 Development Review DRC2003-00988. and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 Applicant: Oasis Commercial Development Initial Study Prepared by: _Donald Granger, Assistant Planner Date: October 29. 2003 • .. ... -. -, .. AirQUallty ~r ~ ~° -- ,>s, z^ , Uaw~,°,~'; ,e ~mn x~ ~~~s,r,,~«~~- All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifica4ons Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C - 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in South Coast Av Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied ether by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions C N 1 of 7 .- -. ..- Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C R areas to erosion over extended eriods of time eview of Plans A/C 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work eriods Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn racbces • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C R by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public eview of Plans A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high words (i e , gO/CE C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 re uirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils gO/CE C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng A/C 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) shall Construction be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use _ . 20 7 ~ i ~ .. • . . .: All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of-Plans D- 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules m conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shail be regwred to configure then operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air condit~omng, appliances and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources .` Ii any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modrfication Report without an opporturnty for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report N 3 of 7 C N .. ... -. - .- .. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Rewew of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evacuation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archrom A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Rewew of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shalt Report submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and CP B Review of A/D - 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbm activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Rewew of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Rewew of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods , The site shall be treated with water or other sod- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) - Corf"struction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 ~~ N .. .. -. .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction - from the site during such episodes Chemical sod stabd¢ers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality , Structures to retain precipdation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins Storm Drain Signage (ID number SD-13) shall be CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check Media Filters or (number MP-40) or Drain Inserts (MP- CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 52) shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 include "Fact Sheets" from the California Stormwater ' BMP Handbook The precse Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 indicate in the Site Description that the protect is in the Upper Santa Ana River watershed and that known problems include the following contaminates salirnty, total dissolved solids, nutrients, pathogens and chlorides 5 of 7 .. . . . . ~ .. ~ . .- -. . . .. . . . Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C y4 shall submit to the City engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ~ ' ~ , ~ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Durng Construction q 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During q standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Dvision Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Dvision within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted U 6of7 ~ • - -. . .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POBO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, tf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any _ construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings d H ~' Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res onsible Person P Monitorin Fie uenc' "3 FF 9 9 Y r a Methodpf Verlficatio~i ~-- ~~ ~• ~,,;~, ~g `Sarictlons`'~'r ,"~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -Ciry Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwldmg Permit CE -Ciry Engineer or designee C • Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Bwldmg Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-revs-03final doc 7 of 7 •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - SUBTPM16487 SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES APPLICANT: OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK AVENUE AND LAUREL STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: i ~, Completion Date •A. General Requirements 1 The applfcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any actfon brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relinquish such approval The applfcant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Cfty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such actfon but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 is granted subject to the approval ~~_ Development Review DRC2003-00987 B. Time Limits 1 Thfs tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance wtth the approved plans which include _/_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contarned herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-04 1 i \planning\final\pingcommGsubtpm16487 conds 4-14 doc D ~~ Protect No SUBTPM16487 Completion Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all ~ /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit tssuance 5 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Ctty Engineer review and approved pnor to the tssuance of building permtts D. Landscaping 1. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~~_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Division 2 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/~ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/ / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of aif mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fortett F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/~ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint /_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map C~ SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingwmm\subtpm16487 coeds 4-14 doc ~ ~~ Prgect No SUBTPM16487 Comolehon Date H. Street Improvements 1 All publlc Improvements (Interlorstreets, drainagefaclllties, communltytralls, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street Improvements shall Include, but are not Ilmited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Ilghts, and street trees Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions Of approval of development. Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not Ilmited to Street Name Curb 8 ,Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other LAUREL STREET (c) X X RED OAK AVENUE X X X (e) (f) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) ADA access ramp (f) Curbside drain 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlc and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In publlc right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signmg, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and Interconnect condwt shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at Intersections far future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer SC-1-04 Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersecttons per Clty Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer -~~- ~~- ~-~- ~-~. -~-~- ~-~- / / -~-~- i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtpm76487 conds 4-14 doc D t~ Protect No SUBTPM16487 Completion Date Existing Ctty roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Crty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Ctty Planner prior to submittal for fvst plan check Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) ° Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mln. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size aty. Laurel Street Pyrus calleryana NCN 3 ft 20 ft 15 gal Fdl-In OC Red Oak Avenue Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft 15 gal P.A 8 feet or O C greater Construction Notes for Street Trees• 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fled with the Ctty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer J. Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects ~-~_ -/-~- ~-~_ ~~- ~~_ -~~_ ~-~_ SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtpm16487 conds 4-14 doc 4 D,z ~ Project No SUBTPM76487 Completion Date K. General Requirements and Approvals An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first, for Driveways to the north and northwest A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • SC-i-oa -~-~- / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtpm16487 coeds 4-14 doc J D ~ ~ \ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS DRC2003-00987 & , PROJECT/FILE #: SUBTPM16487 APPLICANT NAME: PROJECT NAME: LaureVRed Oak Offlce OCCUPANCY CLASS: LOCATION: Laurel and Red Oak FLOQR AREA: DATE: March 11, 20[)4 TYPE CONSTRUCTION. PLAN TYPE: Office bwldmg FD REVIEW BY: Oasis Commercial Development B 16,648sgft V-N Moises Eskenazl THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT during the course of development Please note that building permits will not be issued until the on-site and off-site water (fire) plans are approved by CCWD and RCFPD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply i 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fue hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fue hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located. 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At rntersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Dwision to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control afire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 1750galtons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square mch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow• Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fue hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow ~~ u DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 n Page 1 of 5 ~ = G 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwidmg, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Prowde one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spacing and distribution requirements 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fve lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specdications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radws shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 46-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openings 5 Vegetation. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- mchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fue vehicles 6 Fire Lane Identification. All regwred red curbing and signage shall identify fue lanes A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved FCS-5 Fire code permit that may be required on your protect. 1 General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or ro ert DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 [~ Page 2 of 5 ~ \~ Zi\ 2 Operate a place of public assembly FSC-6 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Buil ,ing, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSG7 Aftemate Materials and Methods ` The Fve Safety Division will review requests for attemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption equipment for the surrounding controlled intersections 2 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submmed indicate that a requved point of Fire District access ' a Reqwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or ' b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan regwred below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the requvements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surtace, etc shall be provided Contact the Fve Construction Services 909 477-2713 -_I DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 (~ Page 3 of 5 V ~~ 3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and built-in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fve Safety Dmsion The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fve Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans; specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fve Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The budder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior io issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-toot radws of the protect 4 Public Installation: All regwred public fire hydrants shall be rnstalled, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engrneering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bulding and Safety/Fire Construction Servces (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit• Plans for the requved automatic fve sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for rewew and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 D 9C2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 ^ \~ Pa e4of5 ll 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire Suppression System• Plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protects n of commercial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Buildin and Safe /Fire Construction Services 909 477-2713 7 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fve District permit Contact Building and Safety/Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 , 8 Access Control/1'raffic Calming Device Permit A Fire District permit is required to install any access control device, trafficcalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as trafficcalming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without pnor wntten approval of the Fire Distract, Fire Safety Divson 9 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fue Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 10 Construction Access: Fve Distract access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards Contact the Fue Safety Division ~ (909)477-2770 11 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 Address- Other Than Single-family: New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 14 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fue suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services 15 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing. Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the Fire sprinkler Monitoring alarm system shall be tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services 16 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 Q Page 5 of 5 D ~~ "~ RESOLUTION NO 04-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 16,448 SQUARE FEET ON 1 2 ACRE OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK AVENUE AND LAUREL STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0206-352-11 A Rentals 1 Oasis Commercial Development filed an application for approval of Development Revew DRC2003-00987, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of April 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced meeting on April 14, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a vacant 1 2 acre parcel of land, located at the northeast comer of Red Oak Avenue and Laurel Street, and b The properties to the north of the subtect site are developed with a restaurant, coffee shop and fast food restaurant, and are zoned Industnal Park, the property to the south is vacant and is zoned Industnal Park, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Industnal Park, the property to the west is vacant and presently has an application filed for the development of two office bwldings, and c The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story office bwldmg, which is a permitted use within the Industnal Park District, and d The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The project wdl provide office faalities for a variety of professional offices and promote a high employment density, which is a land use goal of the Industnal Park District, and p,Z ~s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0438 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 f The project design incorporates an extenor courtyard, covered outdoor employee eating area vvith a decorative wood trellis and the use of two pnmary matenals on the extenor of the bwlding, thereby meeting the design goals of the Industnal Park Distnct by providing a high-level of architectural design and an outdoor pedestnan amenity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting, and upon the speafic finding of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludesas follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance Huth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applcable thereto, wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity i 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negatroe Declaration, togetherHnth all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative DeGarehon has been prepared in compliance Huth the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Decaration Huth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that Hall result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wtldlife resources orthe habdat upon which Hnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the meeting, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~_ O~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-38 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannmp Diwsion 1) The columns at the balconies on the second floor shall be boxed out to match the supporting columns on the first floor The boxed out columns shall extend to the bottom of the comics Bnck should be added to the columns at all second floor balconies 2) At the south elevation, west of the exit, the center plaster column shall be eliminated and the bnck recess shall be deepened to a depth of 12 inches 3) The bnck band "arrowpoints" at the south and west elevations shall be ehmmated 4) The two large elements that house the stairwells at the south and west elevations shall be lowered to be only slightly above the rooflme, and shall be redesigned vnth a two-tiered cap that matches the rest of the bwlding Final design shall be subject to City Planner rewew and . approval 5) Large member lumber s¢es (8-inch by 8-mch posts, B-mch by 10-inch beams, and 2-inch by 6-inch lattice), and beams v~nth decorative ends shall be utilized at the employee outdoor eating area Posts shall be placed on a 2-foot by 2-foot bock base that ~s a minimum of 4 feet high, and colored concrete v~nth score Imes shall be used in the employee outdoor eating area 6) The courtyard at the pnmary entrance (north elevation) of the bwlding shall be redesigned to include landscaping Final design shall include large-size potted plants 7) Colored concrete or 24-inch by 24-inch scored concrete shall be used m the first nine spaces in front of the buildings (carpool and handicap), and in the courtyard at the main entrance at the south elevation 8) All outdoorfumiture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc ) shall be uniform 9) Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating area 10) Decorative concrete pavers shall be provided at the entrance of the two dnve aisles Concrete pavers shall match the existing concrete pavers in the pnmary east-west dnve aisle of the protect 11) All conditions from Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 shall apply D,Z`~`~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-38 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 4 Enaineenna Division 1) Incorporate drain inserts, a Best Management Practice (BMP), (ID number MP-52) into the design and identify them on the Conceptual Grading Plan Stone drain signage (number SD-13) shall also be installed 2) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CC&Rs) 3) The parkway, from one-foot behind the sidewalk to the top of curb, shall slope downward at a two percent grade 4) Retaining walls, inctuding their footings, shall not cross property Imes unless evidence of permission from the neighbonng owners is provided 5) Pnor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rfat least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropnate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Forte CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division vwthin 60 days follovnng the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Environmental Mdigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficetion 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Av Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray ~, ~ ~~, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-38 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 5 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply moth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follov~nng provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave, or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • ' Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance moth local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high moods (i e , ~nnnd speeds exceecJmg 25 miles per hour) m accordance ninth SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated ninth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, m accordance ninth SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use 10) All mdustnal and commercial faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , m excess often minutes) 11) All mdustnal and commercial faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools D,~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0438 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 12) All mdustnal and commercal site tenants ninth 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All mdustnal and commercal site tenants wrath 50 or more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliana:s, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane wnndows and weather-strapping Cukura/ Resoun~s 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wall • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification wnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites wnthin new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follownng appropnate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resouraas wnthin the pro/ect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrucLon field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures D,s ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0438 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT . Apnl 14, 2004 Page 7 Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils vnth minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found vinthm an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speumens vnth a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoGated vinth vehiGe tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the • time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when v~nnd speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Storm Drain Signage (ID number SD-13) shall be indicated on the prease Grading Plan submitted for plan check 3) Media Filters or (number MP-40) or Dram Inserts (MP-52) shall be indicated on the grease Grading Plan submitted for plan check 4) The grease Grading Plan submitied for plan check shall include "Fact Sheets" from the California Stormwater BMP Handbook 5) The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall mdwate m the Site Descnption that the protect is m the Upper Santa Ana River D ~~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0438 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 Page 8 • watershed and that known problems inGude the following contaminates Salinity, total dissolved solids, nutnents, pathogens, and chlondes 6) Pnor to issuance of grading or pawng permits, the applicant shall submit to the Gty Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Pertnit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineerforcoverage underthe NPDES General Construction Pertnd Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speGfied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the . Planning Division The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division vhthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Diwsion If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance v~nth above noise standards or halted 3) Haul truck delrvenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residenbal dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman p,~ ~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-38 DRC2003-00987 -OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 9 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the follo~nnng vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • D,z q~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File SUBTPM16488 SUBTPM16487 No.: Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00987 and Tentative Parcel Map This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. , 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary.iThis procedure designates who wtll take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 u • • p ~~ ~~ DRC2003-00988 AND SUBTPM16488 OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dvision The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Dvector or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits ~,~ C~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTPM16488 Related Files:, Development Review DRC2003-00987 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16487 Applicant: Oasis Commercial Development Initial Study Prepared by: _ Donald Granger, Assistant Planner Date: October 29. 2003 /C I • ~. .. Air Quality ' ,' _'~'a'~~~ -~ , x~' ;;~~^ ~R~u;~°~~~ ~ >q3 `~ ~ 4 ,r ~ ~~,~-.~ ~e ~ All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venhcation Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be - infeasiblefor the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted m South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C - Review of Plans A/C Z4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions 1 of 7 • • i Ci N ... .. .. .- • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Review of Plans A/C Z4 Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of - - - work enods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineerin ractices - Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C R by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public eview of Plans A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , g0/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 re wrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard raho on sods g0/CE C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During AIC 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A/C 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) shall Construction be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction•grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 2 of 7 b .. .. -. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C y3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D y3 more employees shall be requred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industral and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D y3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high eff~ciencyllow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C y4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources ', `',"a`,a ,fl ,--' ~""u. '_ '~.~ '~~'~ r ~ x~; fi.'~^~^,~e°;" , _ ~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will _ Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demoidion or signrficant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo icai value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C _ -Revew of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report . 30~ . L .. ... • .. . Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Revew of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect - - area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent - archivm A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that wilt also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mtigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report ' copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils ° " °~ s~ ~ x'~ ~~ " '~ a ` ~ ~ ~ ,~ ,~~~ ro°~ ~ ~ _ ; > ~~ ~ , at ~ . ~ ~ = W«. , t„~~. The site shall be treated with water or other sod- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 4 of 7 ~ -. . .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Ouahty ' Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the prolect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Storm Drain Signage (ID number SD-13) shall be CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check Media Filters or (number MP-40) or Drain Inserts (MP- CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 52) shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check The precise Grading Pian submitted for plan check shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 include "Fact Sheets" from the California Stormwater BMP Handbook The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 indicate in the Site Description that the prolect is in the Upper Santa Ana River watershed and that known problems include the following contaminates salinity, _ _ - _ total dissolved solids, nutrients, pathogens and chlorides • 5~ • ... .. -. .. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permds, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 ~ shall submit to the Cdy engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted _ - _ to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit NOISE ~, =fE ~~. , ..o ~°'~ t~ "~, ~~ z ~;'a:d" + Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specfied in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hue a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report then findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 6of7 -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used far hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings "N PCey to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Fteq(rtencji - ~ Method of Ver_Hlcetion"~~„t" ~~"; ~m>~,z~,,,~~r- Sancllons CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Finat Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Ciry Engineer or designee C -Throughout QOriSINCUOn C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdahon i \planning\final\cega\mmchklst-revs-03final doc ~ '~ ~ •~~I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00987 SUBJECT: OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT: OASIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK AVENUE AND LAUREL STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any acbon brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-38, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading achwties and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _I_I_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations • 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, ail Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-04 ~ i \planning\final\pingcommWrc2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc O ,~ \~ Protect No DRC2003-00987 Completion Dete 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the BwlcLng and Safety Division • to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and buiding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be I _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval to the case of a custom lot subdrviston, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all _/J_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speaftc Plans rn effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-sde lighting plan, mcluding a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of budding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adlacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of buildfng permits i 9 Ali ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be i_/~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermtng, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- ' family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults • 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~_/ including proper illumination 11 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ bulding colors E. Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/~_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall ~~_ contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb) • SC-1-04 2 ~~ L \ ~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc Protect No DRC2003-00987 Comoletion Date • F. G. C~ 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double strped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/~_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/~_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobtle parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the requred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 For industrial protects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be ~_/_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and egwpment shall be sufficient Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 Ail private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc 3 D \ ,].. \O~ Protect No DRC2003-00987 Comoletion Date shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 6 feet In vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shru~s shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requir d by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for ! _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all Landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced wthin 30 days from the date of damage S The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, land§caping, and sidewalks shall be Included In ~~_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~~_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ' _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined In Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code i H. Signs ~' 1 The signs Indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ~_/~ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _/~_ approval prior to issuance of building permits 1. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~_ Implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner In the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may tie used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Clty staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a soled overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permds SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\tlrc2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc 4 D ,_. \~ Protect No DRC2003-00987 Comole4on Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSRATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit flue complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and av conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~-/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/~_ Bwlding and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00987) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to Cary Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-1-04 i \planning\hnal\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc 5 D = \~ Project No DRC2003-00987 ComoleLOn Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Diwsion's public _/_/_ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwldmg Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~ ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness ' 2. Provide compliance with the California Buddrng Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops fn attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_J Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requved fve'rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Calfomia Budding Code, City Grading _/~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The fmai grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan i 2. A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/~_ pertorm such work i 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the i, _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwldfng permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildrngs where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fdl The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwi Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 2 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/_/_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (rnterior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees SC-1-04 6 (, \ ~ \~ i \planning\final~pingcommWrc2003-00987 conds 4-74 doc 11 Protect No DRC2003-00987 Comoleuon Date 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source • of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is requred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to SVeet Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Sitle- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trell Metlian Island Bike Trell Other LAUREL STREET (c) X X RED OAK AVENUE X X X (e) (f) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) ADA access ramp (f) Curbside drain 4. Improvement Plans and Construction C a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Crvil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Puil boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as duected by the Cary Engineer s SC-1-04 Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requned A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer -/~_ ~-~- -~-~- / / ~~_ ~-~_ -/ /_ -~-~. i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 contls 4-i4 doc - J ~J Proiecl No DRC2003-00987 Comolehon Date g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Cary Planner prior to submit~al for first plan check Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Profect Engineer Mln Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spaeing Size Qty. Laurel Street Pyrus calleryana NCN 3 tt 20 tt 15 gal Fill-In OC Red Oak Avenue Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 tt 15 gal PA Sfeetor OC greater Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfilf soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Cary Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first, for Driveways to the north and northwest 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved SC-1-04 / ~ / / . _/_/ _/~. / / .~_/- _/_/~ i \plannmg\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc 8 O\~\\~ Protect No DRC2003-00987 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR .COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldmgs shall have minimal securely lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, wdh direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Ltghhng in exterior areas shall be mvandal-resistant fixtures U. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibthty 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet m length and two feet m width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department 3 Atl developments shall submd an 8 Yz` x 11' sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-oa i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00987 conds 4-14 doc D,~ \~\ Completion Date -~~. ~~- -~-~ ~-~_ -~-~- -~-~- -/-/- RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS DRC2003-00987 & PROJECT/FILE #: SUBTPMi6487 PROJECT NAME: Laurel/Red Oak Office LOCATION: Laurel and Red Oak DATE: March 11, 2004 PLAN TYPE: Office budding APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA: TYPE CONSTRUCTION: FD REVIEW BY: Oasis Commercial Development B 16,648sgft V-N Moises Eskenazi THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT during the course of development. Please note that building permits will not be issued until the on-site and off-site water (fire) plans are approved by CCWD and RCFPD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS. FSG1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply i 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and I location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a prolect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers. The required minimum fire flow for this prolect is 1750gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed prolect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow r~ ~J J DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 Page 1 of 5 1~ ~~Z 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mams• Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not Ime of sight 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fve flow or fraction thereof, subtect to standard spaang and distribution requirements 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, and calculations for the fve sprinkler system underground to the Fue Safety Division for approval Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 FSC-4 Fire District Site Accbss- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drroe aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facilRy or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located wrthm 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire manes: The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum Unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radds shall be 20-feet c The outside tum radius shall be not less than 46-feet d The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surtace shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5 Vegetation. Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 6 Fire Lane Ident~tication: All regwred red curbing and signage shall identrfy fire lanes A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submttted to and approved FCS-5 Fire code permit that may be required on your protect. 1 General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgmenf of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or ro ert DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 Page 2 of 5 D '~ \\~ 2 Operate a place of public assembly FSC-6 Plan Submittal Regwred Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Bwl ing, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews wdl be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-7 Alternate Materials and Methods ' The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fue District "Application for Aitemate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact th@ Fve Safety Droision at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1 Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdmsion map, the Fire District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption egwpment for the surrounding controlled intersections 2 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a requred point of Fire District access i a Requires passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire Distract to gain access to the sublect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Safety Division prior to recordation shall approve the agreement To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other egwvalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all property sublect to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel sublect to the agreement d Site Plan• The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu, load-bearing capacity of roadway surface, etc shall be provided Contact the Fire Construction Services 909 477-2713 DRC2003-00987 8 SUBTPM16487 O \~ \\~\ Page 3 of 5 \`~ 3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a requred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and bwlt-m fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. The Fire Safety Diwsion prior to recordation shall approve the agreement PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans; specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fve Distract standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distract Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2 Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation All prvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shalt submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior io issuance of any bwlding permd, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water Distract inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On prroate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 2 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 (~ Page 4 of 5 D ~~ ~\ J 5 Sprinkler Monitoring The fre sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fue sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies Contact Bwldmg and Safety/Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire Suppression System: Plans and specrficat~ons for the fire suppression system for the protectio of commeraal-type crooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submrfted to Fire Construction Servces for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Bwidin and Safe /Fve Construction Services 909 477-2713 7 Fve Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submilted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work ~s allowed wthout a Fire District permit Contact Bwldmg and Safety/Fre Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8. Access ControllTraffic Calming Device Permit A Fue District permd is regwred to install any access control device, trafficoalming device, or gate on any access roadway Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as trafficcalming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways wrthout pnor wrilten approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Dmsion 9 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted pnor to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information Contact Bwldmg and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 10 Construction Access: Fire D~stnct access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minim m clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of ar)y obstructions at all times, in accordance wrfh Fve District Standards Contact the Fue Safety Division (sos> an-2no ' 11 Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways Dead-end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fre Code or Fire District standards 12 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibrf parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes Contact Bwldmg and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 13 Address- Other Than Single-family: New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an addilional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Bwiding and Safety/Fue Construction Services (909) 477-2713 14 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services 15 Frre Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing. Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the Fire sprinkler Monitoring alarm system shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 16 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Dmsion This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwlding or property C~ • • DRC2003-00987 & SUBTPM16487 D . Page 5 of 5 ) I \\~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 14, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Douglas Fenn, Assistant Planner, MPA SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP - The proposed subdivision of 4.27 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park Dlstnct, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street - APN• 0210-081-26 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003- 01001 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS -The master plan and design review of 4 two-story office buildings totaling 66,190 square feet on 4 27 acres of land in the in the Haven Avenue Overlay Distract and Industrial Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street - APN. 0210-061-26. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - Haven Bwlding Materials Supply Yard, Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park South - Trademark Office Complex; Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park East - Vacant and Strawberry Field, Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park West - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District and Industrial Park B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West- - Industrial Park C Slte Characteristics. The site Is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th street, and Is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site To the north of the site Is Haven Bwlding Materials supply yard To the east Is vacant land and to the south Is vacant land with the Trademark ITEMS E and J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTTM16323 & DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP April 14, 2004 Page 2 Office/industrial Park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The land slopes to the south with a grade of 2 percent. Evidence of reoccurring disang for fire abatement purposes is evident D Parkma All proposed parcels would be developed with required parking for their assoaated buildings There is enough parking for each parcel and approved land use. There will also be reaprocal vehicular access between all of the parcels. The total required parking for the protect is 265 stalls with a total of 267 proposed parking stalls. ANALYSIS: Parcel Mao In contunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel map to divide the site into 4 parcels, one for each building. The Development Code exempts the protect from the minimum parcel size requirements because it is a master planned development General The protect consists of a master planned development of 4 office buildings Buildings 1 and 2 front along Haven Avenue and are both 14,074 Square feet Buildings 3 and 4 are both 19,022 square feet The buildings are rectangular with urnque elements of design A striking feature of the protect is an enhanced entry treatment, lined with Date Palms, that starts with a decorative pavement entry and a public art water element and continues through the heart of the protect culminating in a plaza between Buildings 3 and 4 Access into the protect site is from Haven • Avenue and the Winston Avenue terminus on the east side of the protect Additionally, the applicant has provided a vast amount of landscaping, art, and a landscape corridor between Buildings 3 and 4 for pedestrian convenience and accessibility with amenities (such as a barbeque south of Building 1) The buildings have a rich 360-degree architectural theme that includes decorative details, recessed reflective glazing elements, and stone like vertical veneers, metallic roof corrnce (which gives the buildings a modern look) and other quality treatments to the professional office buildings A. Desion Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping on February 17, 2004. The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) recommended approval subtect to design recommendations The Committee complimented the applicant on their design A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of Approval B Gradino Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on February 17, and March 2, 2004 The Committee recommended approval. C Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committees reviewed the protect on February 17, 2004, and recommended approval subtect to the standard conditions outlined in the Resolutions of Approval D Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. The City completed Part II and the Environmental Checklist It was determined that the protect E,S 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTTM16323 & DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP . April 14, 2004 Page 3 could have significant adverse environmental impacts to short-term au and water quality dunng construction from grading, egwpment exhaust, erosion, and water runoff Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air and water quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site. , RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 and Development Review DRC2003-01001 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Respectfully submitted, /-'~ Brad Buller City Planner BB DF Is Attachments Exhibit °A" - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 Exhibit °B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C° - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Design Review Comments dated February 17, 2004 Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 Draft Resoluti on of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01001 C~ k,5 3 S 1058-002-01-03 Palmae Business Center\From Consultants\Crvil\TPM16323 DWG, 03/18/2004 12 51 58 PM h S`~ ,,~~ ~i~~ • ~~ ~~ = ~~ ~ ~a ~$ q g_ ~~ ~ ~ a~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~' ~a ~ ~~S ~g a z ~a ~n '.~~ a g" ° e a ~~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ n ' HAVBJ AVHJUE - _ R~ ~ .e ~, ~~ D ~'_ ~ g q 9~ ~ g ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ p ~~ y ,ml1Ti T'i ~r GFSG ~ ~~ ~ ~ O O ~ .r k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ CC ~ ~ i ~ y 3 w I i ,~ "0°' i~ , O u IYO /Y w r!!• Oro 6y6y ~p:g:~~aa lD ,err. is ~ a v mb loieirv~rwncP ~~ ~ t .w no-anw rKwrr w J 1 _ ~Dy iY~~y,O yP ~Wb~ JMMI m~YwAII1 ~w'm+SVWUS •31•N 11I31111X~G M! Q ` .~.o c a ama .1 ll ! ~ 1 r i~ ° ! ~3 ~! pg ~e Sa § c / ~ • E 1a i§ t ~ a ~ ~ a f 5:~ ~~ ~ '- -' 19~ t i ~ 3~V . ~ m mom®®®mm ~ ~- ~,? N NIM 1 y M ,95 ,Vl LYJ ! ,~ /EE ! ~ ~~~ __- - ~ - --- i ! 1 E ~ ~ R _ ~ o o ' [p~i @9 ~geplEE 1€! i1 ~ ! ~ l ~ -- i ------ o'l 5 1 i lf .e 9 l ' -t i mmmmommmm mmm ~! -z~--. ;- " ~Dl,~~81l~~4~Ya , ;` ,,,~ ,~, ;; mmmm mmommmmm , -%i`• . , I ` I ~ ~ ~ t4 O - - r .--Q-. .--0» ! ~ ~ E s ~ ' ~ ~ 1 ! ! F I ! ' ~ IE ~ ~ ® ! E~ E , ~E pE .rte o®oooo©®om mm . e .~ ^ - ~ ~ - 1 ~~ i ~ ' W .,P{~~ . " " ,~ '2~ ~ ~~`,- ~ ~ ! e - ` ~ ! i -----3- ~ _ ~ ' ~°~`~ " ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° i ~ 9 ~ t ~ ~ - Ya m I - - ~ . .-o-~ = - - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! i 0~ ° O o0 0 3 2 - - O O ~ ,r , • • • • •• • i a (e ~~ ~ ! 7 .-m. ` . .--o-~ h v I ~ ~ Im - e 1 .f' ! k f s _~ .-o-» ` -( , rtea;~r'~ ' , ~ p., , r +.„~. ~~ ~,~d~ ~ I 1 I O m q~ m M 8 • SS y,'~ifr Lh r v I"' - nr}~j! t s d••o z' -- ~ ~ •~ ~ . ,~~C~. Lk -kA ,S d~' ~' ~ ,~ ~y, =w ~'!: `, ,'~# 2Y ~~i SDiy - E ,r' • ' ~ § ~ 1 a f{ e 1` 7th ~ ~ i : ., ; •i #; a E ! 2 P c •i' t l .Sn . `~ ~ _ _- y~ a _-_-_ ~y O 0 ~ , D 1 i > 6 y,,,. 1 ______ E ~ ~ ~ • ,bL OEE M, 9h,61.A7N e ; 6 s e 6s ~~~/// - -- ---- - ----- -- --- i 3 ! ! 33 3 _ _ _ _ ~ om a~ ~ i - ua~ ~ g w ro aa ~ ~ ~ I J ~q ~ ~ ~ 1 1YY1~~~ O rn-s i Li ~ ~aa ~~ 9! i ~ ~7~~@~ 1iq~~~ v ~f~ I ~I~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °m ~~ ~ e ~ I aCtt~ iE ~~~ a ~ ~ U~~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~tt,~t~~~~~~~~ ~~~ t!lttte,-t~~11~ ~i ~ iLtLtyt-~~~ ~~~-~~ i I 15i _. 6 ~ 1 P e ~ ~ ~ r~~ LJ y P 6 a ~~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ m . ~ z ~ ~~ e ~. ~ ~ei ~ °i s L ! ~' U L°__°_'J II ® t ~ `° I _ ~ # -~ r ~t 3rr~nv ~nvH ~ ~.+=aw,..~ - - - - ejd ~pei~~ aouo~~EO-RL-7.L\u~~'fll~°:96;~ woi-'~~a~ua~ s.a~ inn aew e ~~~ ®~ T.4S-Y ~- t :w ~J. ~~ .. ~. r O:~ ®a 4 Y,. ~ ~~ ~ ~~~1 ~3i ~~~~ ~~gE~~~i~~i~~~ ~lle~le~C$~11~ ' @ae a~ ~ ~~ G~ ~~~ .~ e~4 E ~~~?~ ° ~ B @ g~~ i~ ~ ~ g }: I~rieliata...E~:tl~o. ? U ~ ~a i q ` O u ~j U~ dga P[ Q 6 O• ,. - ~. a I ( ~v I 7 r-i ~ I~I /~ L-J yV G U ~ .p U 6 I b 1 Y 3rw~nv v3nvH ~.d~~-~-~--------- - -------- -------------------- s u o ave anwu sae c~~~s ^~c~ ~.. ~: E~TRk ~ m°iain® nn Sa~91 MAlV ~. aW sm.~~~,~,-- T ~ 3 = isSt y ."r _.. xr.,u vrinanun3a v3x3n ~vm3un ~.ero -E~Z ~ E ,•" ~...y ~~v a r ~ :~ r rr~~~LS~~~-xsr~._a c.n~.oiw ~ [a nwxanwo wawa r~x~o sre.mv ~ =yT jo aMUaxvad w~u.on ~ a ~ ~&..im~~L9i; YII I :..w~u~ww~vsyl ~ mn ~nayv I wYIIVL tloou EBltl~Bl~ <~I .,,~..-~ T~pl xv,. uovu ~ a.o.r a t ~' 2 ----0 I l~~~l I I I I~ ~ I I I `r---=f'~--- ---~-- --' I I~ ~ I I I I I~ ~ I I I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ t, tl4 b L_~ ~----0 --~ o bo s-c ti~~e-~+~d-~~e-~ o~ee~sso~ s + auto sf ~~f fwd fY~YJ POnY i ~flNWr'JAMh~ Y V fO ~rYPm~6 WnI WZ ~ ~n ~ lb YMdlYAi13 1X3 t 613Q31B a ~' - ~""' ~vs~oaoiwi vn1Y1391X31 a~vfr _ ~ a _. _- _. ___. _.. __~_- __-. ____.. maw~o•..w aim r~~ww ~~Yr,~t ,Y~y, ^ $K ~!' " n' c ` F' . YY~FF ~ ~ ~ . ~~~ \\ S ;~ ~ ~ ~; ~ 1 P ~ P i I r I F O-- o- o--~ Rl ©- _~ 1 /1 ~~~ 6a ~~a PA-7 ~ 40 3M~ ~9 L dL ~!®af ®4y~y wYPO ~. y dV P.NY QMq iYIYOVtlYMW~ ~ply~ Ol Y 0 9I Y ~ W Wl or .sum awm m YO+wn wo ` YV ~r ~L'~O/Pr~~BQ' ww. ~ YLLbR+YV°"e~na°or.°~°nYi Nldl.'HY M ~~B 1.G ~ f 1 a Y s ~ L1a ~1~ sT ~1~ oT~ T x ~1~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ oT~ e « ~ 1~ a o o g I 1 I~ ' I I ' I 1 I I I I 1 I s s1.1pq~~ b1~ §~ b1~ 1 ~,~ ~I ~ L ~I~ 715 ~I~ ~I~ , ~ O- ~ 1o Q §~ ~ I ~ /' a I I I- 1 1 u~ I Y ~ ~ 1 I I ~ d I m I I I I I I I I y y ~ ~- ,-- I ~ ~ ~--- ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ ~I 6 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ P ~ ~ O- Y ~ ~' • / r ~~ ?~ `~ I y ~~ 1 w F--- ~J ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ v __ (~}~ __ ~_-_ \~~ u.n~., n~ ucnn ••o a ~ ~LITiVL~'l `S 0 Q Q Q 4 Q Q - o--- ------- -------- -- ---- ------- ------- i i i i i i ---0 ~ I ' ~4 o--- ' --------t---------+---------i---------r-------- ~ ---o ~ , ............t.~ -----------------t.......---•----.......t.......---•------.~ ~..~., 6 - - .........i ............. ..I ......-I f - ~ ~ ~ f 1 ~ o--- ~ P ~~ 7.r. -----r---------~- ~~ - ~ --'r----- ~ ---0 i~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i i i ~ - - -- ---- -- - - -- - - - -- - -- o--- N ---o b b b b ~ ~~~ b b COH C ~f ~OF.WRILMI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 {, 1'~ ~ ~~~ ~ o--- L ------ ------- -- - - ------- ------ ---o R i d - I I I i i i , I I I i i i = a ~~ a ~ " _ o--- i i -----r---------~------ i i i i --;---------r-------- - i ---o ~ ~ ~ ~ ode _ i I- ~ ~, . - i _ i i i i i - i ~ ~~ o--- ------- ------- -- ---- ------- ------- - ---o b b b----- --- -------- - b b b PA-8 ccwr~r rrer rt {~Itil mvona~o ~ I a~RO~~ ~ 1B WplYA~9 sBMV~B ~ d J ~~ I 1 I ~ I i I o- o- I t 1j~~~~~wJs~~ : s i I I s I I i o---=---~--- -~ ~ a-=---- 3 ~ I ~i P ~ ~ ~ 1 ! ~ I I ~ I. t l I , E,S1S •E 1 64~ ~~~M WaY .~.-.o~+cnw uz ••~I `eh .lY~ bOl•Ytl _ ~ r ~F' e~_r c miraw ao rww. ~ iawa.~u.w iw°N1~' oR em®rauaia s~a~e i 1 a c~ ~~Q ~~ ! S ~ Glx o1~ L~ S~~ ~~ el~ a~4~ L~~ o yl~ 3ia ~~~ '~~'~~ =~~ ?~3 ~~ I ~° t ; ~ ~v IF I I I I I I I i I I I I I ~ IF i~ ` I« I~ IF I I~ I I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I / I / / i it i r" r" ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I I I I I ~ I I ~ I I I i I ~~ I ~ ~ ; I Y I yy 6~ ~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I 0 I I . . I I I ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ I d I I ~ I I a T Y9 a ~ a ~ I I I ~ ~ fY I I 7 C ~ ~ w I ~ ' 2 C 2 I ~ 1 2 I I ~ ~ ~ @ I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ° t I ~ a I ~ I ~ ~i ~ I I ~ I ~ d I ~° "a i ~ I ~i' I I qy~ ~~~ L 7QW16_ \S Wd 6 21' ~ J}~9i Pm~G VA Yl I do sruruw~~w. Y19Y:AY TMY S r M ! ~! ~ ~~ '~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~€~~ !~~ s -~ y~~ ! ~ .. ~ .~ _ ~ .. n s ~ ._ . . _ ~ ! i~ ~ ~i !? ~~ ! ~! ~ ;, i ~sa s~l~ ~'~~ ! ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ i!'+ i! ` ~~~ ~~~' l~i~ `p ~Y ~ ~ .r .rr .. + .r w N a y 1 V J \~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 P M Doug Fenn February 17, 2004 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16323 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP -The proposed subdivision of 4 27 acres of land into four parcels in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industnal Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately660 feet south of 6th Street - APN 0210-081-26 Related File Development Rewew DRC2003-01001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01001-WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP -The master plan and design review of fourtwo-story office buildings totaling 72,744 square feet on 4 27 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industnal Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street- APN. 0210-081-26 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 Desion Parameters The site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matonty of the site To the north of the site is Haven Building Materials supply yard To the east is vacant land, and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark officehndustnal park directly south Across Haven Avenue, to the west, is vacant land The land slopes to the south with a grade of 2 percent Evidence of reoccumng discing for fire abatement purposes is evident The protect consists of a master planned development of four office buildings Buildings 1 and 2 front along Haven Avenue and are both 15,758 square feet Buildings 3 and 4 are both 20,687 square feet, respectively The bwldmgs are rectangular and in a couple instances uniquely designed within the confines of the shape of the property A striking feature of the protect is an enhanced entry treatment, lined with Date Palm trees, that starts with decorative pavement entry and a public art water element and continues through the heart of the protect culminating in a plaza between Buildings 3 and 4 Access into the protect site is from Haven Avenue and the Winston Avenue terminus on the east side of the protect Additionally, the applicant has provided a vast amount of landscaping, art, and a landscape comdor between Buildings 3 and 4 for pedestrian convenience and accessibility with amenities (such as a BBO south of Building 1) The buildings have a rich 360-degree architectural theme that includes decorative details, recessed reflective glazing elements, stone like vertical veneers, metallic roof cornice (which gives the buildings a modem look), and other quality treatments to the professional office buildings Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect None -Applicant has done a "splendid" tob of addressing staffs earlier design contains Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time pennitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues No exterior downspouts are to be visible from the public right-of-way and protect site EXHIBIT "F" E, S 20 Design Review Committee Action: • DRC2003-00988 Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Fong Staff Planner Donald Granger At the meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mayor and Secondary Issues The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval with the following conditions: Brick shall be added in the following areas to emphasize the office/professional use of the project. On the north elevation, back shall be applied to the entire wall plane, up to the comce, on Units 2, 5, 7, and 10 On the south elevation, back shall be applied to the entire wall plane, up to the cornice, on Units 2, 5, 7, and 10 Bnck shall cover the enure wall plane on all elevations for both towers. The foam window surrounds in the two towers shall be eliminated, and replaced with back surrounds with soldier courses and back ledges Bnck shall be used as a border treatment around the stamped concrete at the arcular plaza 4. Colored concrete or 24-inch by 24-inch scored concrete shall be used m the first 16 spaces m • front of the buildings (carpool and handicap) and m the courtyard at the main entrance at the south elevation 5 The bollards at the plaza shall be decorative and illuminated. Decorative pavement, matching the existing stamped concrete m the pnmarydnve aisle, shall be added at the two east-west drive aisles near the west property line of the protect. C t ~ ~~ •~ \ • • ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM . (Part I -Initial Study) Gry d RanUro Cucanwnga (Please type or print eleaAy using !nk Use the tab key to move Irom one Ilne to the next Ime.) Glanru~ DMs/on teoal an•zrso The'purpose ofttiis form ~is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed ~, projectzso;thafxthe`,City,rriay;review the,project.pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances; and•-° Guidelines;'~~the`~Califoriiia- Environmental 'Quality= Act; and the City's. Rules'and Procedures to~lmplement_CEQA. It i_s important-thaYthe information requested in this , ~-applicatianlienprovided`in>futl:;== - _,-,.,;; `;~.~ ~,.*;`, ,~ , r,;, _ _ _ _- _ ~.: - INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that h rs the responsrbrlrty of the applrcant to ensure that the appl~cabon is complete et the 6me of submittal, Crfy stall will not be available to peAorm work required to prowde mrssrng infonnabon. AppOcabon Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains .Jr!% ~///f ~~P ~ Z3 ~~ EPG~3'0/CY~I Pro/ectTdle PAI_MAE 1~USI1.lE5~S PF~i.I"rE~~ i NameBAddressofpro/ectowner(s) I F,(~~'SMA ~ ME`jF_G~j T~EVEI.a~MGl.l1'r 1IlLG, ~')2~ /JTIGA AVENUE r SU1TE ln0 Q,A~tc~lo Cr~c_a~tb r.~a#~9 91'130 Name B Address ofdeveloper or pro/ect sponsor (~~rr,L~G M F-`f E -2. i31~' V E LO p~A EN'r~ I -.I (, , q 22~i L1TI G/~ AV E NU i/~ U I'j'E IOb RAt~ll'_Hn G~AMbI.ICoA, CA gI'13b ContactPerson6Address M. RFS.1E C~L`fj~h L~IILL~/~,MS CHL•40Afr~IrEG; 2'1 Lo N. SEG~I.Ib A~/EtJ U F_ _ _ U PLA N D k~°,~1 °I I'18 7 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form pfdrHerent from above) SAME AS GOt~1'~L'~ hE IZSOt~I, r~ r~ G 1 t~ p • Telephone Nu/m/_b~er ~-I (]9~ " 1 ~ ~ ^ : 71 CJ C7 `` ~/1r n Page 1 of 1 ~ `~ 2Z Created on 9/22!2003 10 33 AM i~ • • '1) Provide a full scale (&1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide aset o/color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and /rom the site from the primary access points [hat serve the site, and ropresentative views of significant features from the site Incude a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Pro/ectLocation(descnbe) yAGALIT LOT (71.1 FAST SIC7F_ CAF NAVE1.l /.1t/F-hll.1E So--TN OF EXI~'fl-Jt~ I,-1,4y 1.1 f3 IIl.D11.ILy SL1QpL`( °.~-TE 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary) A ~ 1.1 ~ 2. I n ~ Ofd I ~ 2C0 •5) Gross Srte Area (arJsq tt) 4, ~ 7 AC 12F~'S f 20PR~ 12 . FT. '6) Net Sde Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) q , 2.1 /-~LR ES 185t9(~O SGT. P'f' 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet rtnecessary) ~~A ~I 9J Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, trarttc studies) TF-4 'P 1E T SI"['1/ IS A VAGAN'r DI1ZT' l1"(' WHIG!-E HAS . 'p1ZE V l D US L`~ f3E~ti1 CoRA~E.17 A-J D 3L0 P FJS C~E.-.1'j~( 'TTY IA1AR.b TI-4E °~bU'j'4-1. "i'V-1~ ~il'~ WAS CI.EAt~Eb OF VII.LE~(RRt-~~ 11~ "Tl41: LATE. Iq~C~tS THE SI"('F COhI'rAl1.1S I.It'~ Rancho EnvlronmenfallntoFOrm doc Page 2 of 2 ~ `~ 2 j Created on 9222003 10 33 AM Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of nonconshuctron CUP's unless otherwise requested 6y staff 9) Include a description of all perrr~rts which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmenial agencies in ordeq to fully implement the pro/ect ~bR WE~,D GOI.I'T'1~0 -T•H RP AP,E. 1.1[•~ SIC~UI~IC/AN"~ ('.tll ~'I1RAL- HIS'1'hR_IL'A L ~2 'SCEIJIG ASPEG'~'S TD TNti/ ~1-I- ~ . 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or histonca/aspects of the site Crte all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) ?N~ 51'['1/ WAS DFVK 10~~(~ A~421CLILTU2ALl-~At.lb WAS OCCUPIED E3`( VII.IE~(A'p,DS F7,bM AT LEA~•~I~l~q L~ITIL THE LATE IAAOIS t WI-IEl~1 TI--E SITE WAS CLEARED A+.ID . IF FT U-.l bEVEL.O PE'D ~P4;ASP T F~yIP+~I:MEI:TaL SITE, A~E`f*"~NT R~Por 11) roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses 'R+oA'PwAY -JOISe FF~DM 1-IAVie/t~l AVE-.U.t~ lS ONI.`~ t~1O15~ SD11 t/ ALI ~LAZIt~1C~ IiJ OCCUPIED S~A(• S 15 QSSUI-I I; ID 'iL~ l3L= buAL l' LA7 Fit TFI lS WILL. Ml'[~GATE. -~ ni~,c _ T1ZA N S M I Ss 1 O t..! -tf'~ 11.LT'FJ21 f7YL 51'AGF~S 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnption of the site in terms of ultimate use that wdl result from the proposed project Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completron of each increment Attach addrtronal sheet(s) dnecessary 1'Qf~ J EGT' CONSIST S ~~ A l4.aS'i'E>Z PI.A N N)=~i n ~VE~.OP M ENT D~ ~_R~ T'WO•S'1~~Y_~Fl(~E 8U1l~ll.1C.,~ `ME'SU-LDIhk~S --~?uA a RE Cbt 1STRU~.t•Eb o~ ~TF~I, FRAM;c~ ALu M t I•lLa M AI~it7 ASS Wi1JDDW S~{~ EMtFXTEI?,IDi~ IN~t.ILA7'ION Flt~-51-1 SYSTEM A>,ID M.4t~luFACZ'tiRE~ S-~t~4.lE THE ~]_T'F t~KVELDPY1E1.1"~ II.IGLUDES A DRIVEDVEI~ PLIP~LIL Pl-/aZA WITH WA'r~~E~TLR ~ PEDFSTRIAI-l nAT!-1 Rancho EnvlronmentallntoForm doc Page 3 of 3 Created on 9/22/2003'10 33 AM E~~Z`~ bp,1~/~°~ Atlb LAIJDSC.,A'QE. T1-IE E1.ITIRE PRpJEG'1' 15 SGNEDULEI] 'FOR A °.~II.1Ll..E pHAS'E O~ GO~LS"j'RUG"[' -n~l A ~1 r.~ Wll,l.. EE CO M P~'i'F D APPRDX l NLATEL`( OI.I E ~F_L~R. gF'~EQ~ C~iUIL.OI~IC~ PERMITS AI~,E APPRf~VED. 13) Descnbe the surrounding properbes, including informatron on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) -.IOATH OF DRc~.1EGT SITE IS ExlST11,1L~ 1-{AYEIJ BLIIL.b11JCySUPpI.`{ ,~ t"nMM~PtI41.~-~'AIL I~11511JE~S I AI..ID "ib TFIE WESTc~F I-tAV~-.l -S AtaR-GULTUpat USE T1+E °.~IT~ 1 F T~~ Tb T'1-IE 5o~j'1.1 Is ~4 VAC.4 hlT LD'T' C71 BELT L`( TD THE °~OU"~h} bF "fNE VAGA+,LT ~1- 14) Wilt the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character o(the surrounding general area of the ERL~: NO TN PQ.OIECT IS E3EIt~1Ca bE1/ELI~PED PER THE C~EI~IERAL PLAN A1.ID ZoNINC~ At~lD 15 C.OMPATlC3L~ WITH THE S I I R,RO u r~1 D l l~l t:~ U S'F 5. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How will these noise levels affect adfacent properties and on-srte uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed Nntz,T TERM I.IOISE C~EIJEILA710N Wll.lr PEE ~bM Ct~t.lS'~UG'~'IOt.I ~~I11PM~,~T fIO1gE Ir~ILL l~F MITI<r,L1TEh C+~~(1'bhl"['RbLl.ll.l(., F-IOUPf~ OF CoUSTRU~TInt~l TI-IERF -s tilb 1JbISE CoEhlE2AT11.lt:y ACTIVITY ?RoPOSEt~ FOR SITE, '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/mature or scenic trees 17) Indicate any bodies of water Qncludmg domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams ~/A ~, ~ Zs Rancho EnvtronmentallnfoForm doc Page 4 of 4 Created on 9222003 10 33 AM • 18J Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficaUon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct et 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/acJ -3'nf~ Peak use (gaUmm/acJ Imo, n~ o 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank 'Sewer II If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A (or usage estimates) For lurther clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Wafer Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) b Commeroral/Indusfial (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units Detached (md~cate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or for sale units) 21J Anticipated range o/sa/epnces and/orronts Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household size 6y unit type ~ ~ ~~ Rancho EnwronmentallnfoFonn doc Page 5 of 5 Geated on 9/2212003 10 33 AM C~ r~ u 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be res~dmg wrthm the prgect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B • a Elementary b Junior High c Senwr High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descn6e type o/use(s) and major /unchon(s) of commeraal, mdusfial ar mstrtuhonal uses OF F l G E L15E 26) Total floor area of cammerc~al, mdustnal, or msMuhonal uses by type ~ ~ I GE USE Cf~MME4,GA1_ TYQE = '12t144S.F_ 27) Indicate hours of operation '~ A M . -1Z~ '~ ~. M . N b I.I bA`(- F {'{ I D~~( r7GC.AS1b1-LAL WFn,ir-~1t7 U5E . • 28) 29) Number of employees Total 2 Sb 2 ~C] Maximum ShrR ~f ~~/-1. Time of Mawmum Shdt ~(~0 Provide breakdown o(ant~apated/ob classrficahons, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdicabon of the rate of hue Ior each classdicahon (attach additional sheet rf necessary) SPECULATIVE ~~ICE I1~~. 30) '31) Estimation o/the number o/workers to be hired that currently reside m the city U~IK llO W hl For commercial and industnal uses only, mdreate the source, type and amount oI air pollution emissions (Data should be veered through the South Coast Air Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-8283) AUTnMOt'~1LE IS ~i.lL`( SUIIF2GF OF ~M1SSIbhiS . E,S 2~ Rancho EnvtronmenhallnfoFortn doc Page 6 of 6 Created on 9/22/2003 10 33 AM • ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and hood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ability to • provide adequate sernce to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please indicate their response ~ I ~~ WDg i~ltSPDIJ -G = TN RE ISADECJIIA'T"E SEfZVIGF IFDI' W ATE.1z. S 'SE W ~2 FLUbO C nwl'('2o L = NAB UoT FSF,EPI t~Di.1T'~kGTEU 33J In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not l~mded to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o/any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known ~~. i 34) ill the proposed pro/act involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic • matenals, including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above9 If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to 6e used and proposed method of disposal The /oration o(such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cat~on plans ~n. l hereby ceKdy that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/act to the best ofmy ability, [hat the facts, statements, and information presented a2 true and corned tot he best ofmy knowledge and belief l further understand that additional information may be required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga r Date / ~ Signature _ ~QjJ,(,L f Title ~EN1012 ASSOG/ATE WII.LIAMS GHif+o A1ZCH 1 TLCTSr LL'P t ,5 2~ Rancho EnhronmentallnfoFortn doc Page 7 of 7 Created on 9/22/2003 10 33 AM Water Usaoe ATTACHMENT A Average use per day Residential Single Famly ApUCondo CommerciaVlndusMal General and Regional Commerclal Neighborhood Commerclal Generallndustrlal Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family ApUCondos Commercial/Industrial General Commercal Neighborhood Commerclal General Industrial Heavy Industrial Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 Rancho EnvironmenhallnfoFOnn doc 600 gal/day 400 gal/day 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac ' 2,500 gaVday/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac ~~~Z-\ Page 8 of 8 Created on 9/22x2003 10 33 AM ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sulte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 I~ J E,S~ Rancho EnhronmentallnfoFOrm doc Page 9 of 9 Created on 9/22/2003 10 33 AM - = ate.' • A ,A~ • ~, ° ~ l - • t _ " I / LS NE ~ D ` "]I] ~ ISO] A 1 ~_~ B ..°~~ :.... 1209 p _~ ~ n ° ' it ~ 1 ~ I . IE~ _~i. ~ railer 4 ar ' y `/~~ ! e , u ~ ' ~~ u,° ~ Y~~ ° n e ' IIr0 ~ - ' i ~ , , r I,`\ L e 4 IL_' i ~1 a .. ~ ~1 nl II e i ~ r- ~ , , ~'\~ I 1I i 9~ . I x , v w . ~ ,a a Iis0 :•:r, .• ,. : .: ~o AT •~ EKA ~-'' N NTA iFE L .. °: ••••• . ~ ~ ___ . _i_ ___ ~ sr Rochester ' ° \ ~®Reserwl II ___ n .- ~~ 1OBO \~ _ ~%~ ~ , ° a IIOO II Well ~~ u , ~~~~/~ , ~ ^~ f ii /- Well I ~N^ ~ -~ p ~ ~ °~ Well \~ - , , I I t ~0s I p o ~ 109O ~ W ~ ~ OS J \ I a ~~ ° Well~n \ O II n ~' II ` - ~ R DIN I VE RANOHO ~~~CCfCA~L OR - v.J _______ ____ ___= BOUNDA .L~-~-_ a w ,I . . , I. ~ II y .II/ 2 I e ° • n , 1 ° ~ 1 _ ~~ 23 1°00 ~ ~ w • I~~= _ ' _~_ ~>~4t _,5=e~ ----- - ~ n n _~ ~ II ~/a ter ' T~>< \ _ : ~ - ~ _ _ 0 - ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ _ _ D a iwne ~AgA . 1 c ti `~ •~~ ~ ~ ~ -III ~ ' a , IS J wr IE ~ ^ . ` 96] Well ~ ~~~ ii I II ° u n ti, p ~ >s II II II n ° ° o e II 7I II v J I ii 9''0 ° > 11 e . ° ¢ II ~ 11 ti - , u ~ o n n 1 \ II ~i~ ~ II o a ° II 950 II \ II 7pWenl ° u ° ~~ I II II - ~~ ____ _~ ~ ° ~~ ~~ 936 °ai G uAST l „ LI II ~~_ ~'~° £ ~' ~; E f4 0 ' o i5 QUA ~ \ / ~ C II ^ ;~~I '~ ' ` 1 /-y(>~ , ~ 1 11I~y c _ ~ ° 1 II / ~~ I ~ I \ ~i ' ^~.-. a I' p~ ~ , I 30 ! am w 1~a ./ \ ` 1 ''JV9 ° a ~~ ~ I ~~.__15...:--=~... ~ _ ~~ ,~-'•. 194 /R. __- PNO1bREV iSEt7 148 _J l ~ 3f1N3/~V tY711f1 ~'' ~ ~' r-~U~ Nw~ g t- ~ ,,iQ FF _ ~~]] Irw~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wO ml N ~ ~ ~ L_J Z _ Z ` ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ N ~ zo X O O~ O O~ x I N L w w L _ -Lx~ w i ~ __~ L~ ~~ 3nV NO1S~ ~ _ ..: r I O ~ ~ z ~ z z ~ z ~ ~ a O Q V N F f-wO > Z {(~ J x w~m N 7 ' - 7 w C '~ ~ 3f1N3/~V N3hVH _~ W O z '^ vJ ~ z L r O ~ U N V W Z V ~ O W ~3~ ~ a •` ' , ' ~ ' JM4 N dl 1~~:' 9Z 6E 60 £OOZ/SOIO d NOIl VZilll fl 311S l-Vd\aliS WSS3aM 7.0- ~eH1Sa3A3W b 0-100 890\ S C~ ...A- ~.~T..- ~r.,,-mJ ~~~" ~~"s i ~~~Mdi~r.t~hau,~•~~,~., ~ _ ., ' a .w ~ ~' i' r yy3~' " _ i ~ F {, t'.4 ^i y10 ~~ i ~~ ~ ~i~-.! _~ ~i _~ 5~~ {{ •~ r,l ~ ~ i ~ z " { .~ ~ d , r~7~a~ AJL ~ .,. t} ~*. 1~ F~° ,i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ } n ~ ~ r{ a ' ~'ix, v i ~ ~c {~'~ti~1{~. ~ f '~ ' / ~ ~ ~ ~ n -' i ! . i~ ~ ~ ~ ~J a ~l T~` ~•y ~'. ~l . ~ ~ f ~ i. ~ r!' P ~ ~ '» ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~~ I ~ r ~Y ~~ ~ ~~ " .t d~Y~• t,~yt ~~~, . ,"~'' °'~~ , 4Vt-~Y ,'~i a ~~ " ~~ ~~ ~,, • LJ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Flle: Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 and Development Review DRC2003-01001 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16323 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP -The proposed subdiwsion of 4.27 acres of land mto four parcels in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industnal Park Distract, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street -APN 0210-081-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01001 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP -The master plan and design rewew of four, two-story office bwldings totaling 72,744 square feet on 4 27 acres of land in the in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and Industrial Park District, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street -APN 0210-081-26 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: • William Chiao Architects, LLP 276 N Second Avenue Upland, CA 91734 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site To the north of the site is vacant land and the existing Haven Bwlding Supply business To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark office/Industnal park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The land slopes to the south with a grade of 2 percent Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is ewdent 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dnrision 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 • 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or partiapation agreement) None ~,S 3~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 2 . GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 - Frne Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model • ~~~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving a least one impact that is a °Potenbally Significant Impact,° °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or °Less Than Significant Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology/Soils ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Land Use/Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ~ () Population/Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities/Service Systems (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed prolect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared , (/) 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a sigmficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a °Potentially Sigmficant Impact° or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated° impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potenti ly significant of is 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DEC A 10 purs t applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pur n t th ear ror NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation m s at i s ~ n the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared By -- Date -r~ "~~ a Reviewed ed /~1/A ~,/!J'///1~1///~1/1( Date E, S 3~ Irntial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 t. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) quality of the sde and ds surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views m the area Comments: a) There are no signii~cant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 Although the site is located within a wew corridor, the bwldings will be setback 45 from Haven Avenue The bwldings, site design and landscape palette will not obstruct wows of the north-south Haven Avenue scenic corridor b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The 4 27 acre site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site To the north of the site is vacant land and the existing Haven Building Supply business To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark officelndustnal park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The proposed prolect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site The casual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is regwred prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility Imes less than 66kV and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses ~~ C~ r~ L_ E t`, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 5 Comments: a) The 4 27 acre site is designated as Pnme Farmland by the State of California Department of Conservation The property is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally so~th of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matority of the site To the north of the site is vacant land and the existing Haven Bulding Supply business To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark office/industrial park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site There are approximately 1,300 acres of Pnme, Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is edher developed or committed to development according to General Pian Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, 2/3 of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City • c) The 4.27 acre site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the matonty of the site To the north of the site are vacant land and the existing Haven Building Supply business To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark Officelndustnal Park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The nearest agricultural use is across the street of Haven Avenue west of the protect site No adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR t]UALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected av quality wolation~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development wail contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State t~ n~ standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated dunng grading and construction actvities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain m the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry m the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and egwpment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions assoaated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an au quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugdrve dust and egwpment emissions are requued to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mdigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-signrficant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as fo reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material In accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e, wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • i ~,.~ yo Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 • Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio or• soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. II 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6). Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for sigmfic~nce, therefore, would all be cumulatively sigmficant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a signficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatwely significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-sigmficant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left Idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a sigmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council ~ ,S `~1 Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions Ias a signficant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations! was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as senstive receptors. long-tens health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create signilicant impacts il they are located within 1/4-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic av contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401. The protect site is located more than 1/2-mile from the nearest sensitive receptor Office use is not expected to generate toxic av contaminants Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect ~ a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () 0 ( / ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified , as a candidate, sensdive, or special status species m local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identfied in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildiile Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limiled to, marsh, veinal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sdes~ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict wdh the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial and office/professional uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources Compliance Biology prepared r1 L J • F, ~ yZ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 9 a DSF habitat survey this past December 2003 No Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Flies were observed on or near the site during a survey on a field investigation December 12, 2003 Additionally, Impact Sciences, Inc conducted ahabitat-based evaluation for DSF on the site in June 2000 This report concluded that the site had low potential to support DSF based on existing vegetation, past site disturbance, and lack of DSF in the immediate vicinity b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-sde, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The malordy of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed Also see comments noted under a) above for additional documentation No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the prolect site, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans wdi occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change m the significance () (/) () () of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Duectly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemetenes~ Comments: a) The prolect sde has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction actmty, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ~,~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 10 • Consider establishing provisions to require mc{orporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. II • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the aFea. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one Gopy of the completed report with original Illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary penod, when the last °Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain sigmficant vertebrate fossils The protect sde is underlain by Quatgrnary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented i 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monkor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is m an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure (curb, gutter, and streets), surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated ~_~ ~, ~ y`{ • Inltlal Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 8. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect• a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on () () () (/) the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area , or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mmes and Geology Specal Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefactions () () () (/) iv) Lands6des~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or altematwe waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and tt is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is rt in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hdl Fault, passes approximately 1 5 miles north of the of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 75 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producng up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 8 miles northeasterly of The site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„. 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 13 miles northeasterly of the stte Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant • b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions dunng September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction actmties may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts m the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. F,~~IS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 12 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according tb a schedule established by • the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAaMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aqufer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not wrfhin a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Delhi fine sand, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matonty of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Delhi fine sand sod association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3. These sods typically have very slow runoff, and the hazard of soil blowing is moderate Delhi fine sand can be nearly level to strongly sloping The prolect site has very gentle grades in southerly dvecbon. No adverse impacts are antiapated e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater • disposal No septic tanks or altematwe wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the prolect a) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mde of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area i) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area E ,~ ~1b Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 I~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ~) ~) ~) (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () ~) ~) (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed office buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time, however, office uses are not expected to use hazardous materials No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will • reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level-less-than significant No adverse impacts are antiapated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site The project site is located within a 1/2 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. Typically, the office and professional uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed office and professional building project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an arport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Project site is located approximately 2 6 miles north of the Ontario Avport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Auport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban . Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the Crty according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 ~,~ ~ 1 Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requvements~ I b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defeat in aquiler volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () (/) () ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-sde~ d) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () ~/) capaaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of ~ polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redvect flood flows Q Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water D~stnct (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor wtll it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development atywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water faalities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented r_~ L • E, ~ y~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be mtegreted into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration Include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or over All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the proiect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The following mtigation measure shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be Implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be Identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bulding Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and Cdy Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities assoaated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to mwmize water pollution A Water Quality Management Plan was prepared by Williams Chiao Architects, LLP The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 3) Source control of BMPs, (ID number SD-10: Site Design, SD-11: Roof Runoff, SD- 12: Efficient Irrigation, and SD-32:Trash Enclosures), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plans submitted for plan check. 4) Treatment Control BMPs (number TC-30 Vegetated Swale), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check. 5) Manual BMPs (number MP-40: Media Fllter), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check. 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water duality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will E,S ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum eMent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-sVuctural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 7) Prior to Issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing unds are proposed with this prolect No adverse impacts are expected. h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-5. No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debrs dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibd V-6 The prolect site is not located wrthin a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sds at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the Ctty This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically droide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limded to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The 4 27 acre site is located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, and is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covering the majority of the site To the north of the site is vacant land and the existing Haven Bwlding Supply business To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark office/industrial park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land The proposed prolect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan for the site The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated ~~~ i Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 b) The land use designation of the protect site is Industrial Park. The proposed protect is consistent wdh the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial and office/professional uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect sde is within an area of sensitive biological resources 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect. a) Result in the loss of avadabdity of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result m the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resoume recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Pian, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • 11. NOISE. Would the protect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessve () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantal permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect viandy above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessve noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstrip, would () () () (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out Future noise levels are protected to exceed 60dBA and 65dBA within 680 feet and 315 feet, respectively, of the centerline of Haven Avenue Existing noise levels exceed 60dBA and 65dBA within 500 feet and 232 feet, respectively, of the centerline of Haven Avenue The City's standard is 60Ldn and 65Ldn for interior and EI ~ S\ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 exterior noise levels in the industrial park area According tP General Plan Exhibit V-11, conventional construction will suffice without any special noise insulation requirements The Cdys Development Code regwres that all commercial and industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed budding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby coin ercial uses is expected. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including' Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. b) The uses assoaated with this type of protect (office professional) normally do not iriduce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are antiapated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Arport and ~s offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new • E,~ sa Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 employees to the area If commeraal or industrial include this sentence Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limded number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matonty of the employees will likely be hired from wdhin the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are ant~apated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result m substantial adverse physical impacts associated wrth the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance oblechves for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments• a) The site, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, generally south of 6th Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 25 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faaldies or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilties Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Addtional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be requred to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of budding permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 75 miles from the protect site. The protect will not requre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a ~,~ Sj Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by tf•e City Council The proposed prolect is consistent welh the General Plan for which the Eli was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library ithin the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, wh~ch is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect~ a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilties such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilely would'occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or requre () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately .75 miles from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety nsks~ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: l~ J f•J a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in prolect design The prolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume E, S ~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be regwred to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addilion, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permds Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect will generate approximately 137 two-way peak hour traps (RCTM Tnp Generation Methodology), which is less than 250 two-way peak hour traps for nori-retail, therefore, the proposed prolect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) crdena for requiring a traffic impact analysis The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The prolect will be regwred to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticpated. c) Located approximately 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the sde is offset north of the flight path and will not change au traffic patterns No impacts are anticpated d) The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed The prolect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticpated. e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated The prolect design has adequate parking m compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticpated g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to prowde, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the prolect. a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envronmental effects c) Requre or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments t~ 5S Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 f) Be served by a landfill wdh sufficient permitted capacity ( () () (/) to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and Iocai statutes and () () () ~(/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located wthin Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empre Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located wthin Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capaaty The protect is regwred to meet the requrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer poor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered sigmficant d) The Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and pnvate) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent The proposed protect would include the construction/operation of 4 office bwldings totaling 32,506 square feet Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the regwrements of SB 610 and SB 221, and, therefore, would not regwre a Water Supply Assessment. The CCWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater faalihes Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticpated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-t located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated ~~J ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 23 f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated C J 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () (/) ( ) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant , or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of Cahfom~a history or prehistory b) Does th,e protect have impacts that are indmdually () () () (/) I~mited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial and office/professional uses The sde has been previously disrupted dunng annual disang for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibd IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources Compliance Biology prepared a DSF habitat survey this past December 2003 No Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Flies were observed on or near the site dunng a survey on a field investigation December 12, 2003. Additionally, Impact Sciences, Inc conducted ahabitat-based evaluation for DSF on the site in June 2000 This report concluded that the site had low potential to support DSF based on existing vegetation, past site disturbance, and lack of DSF in the immediate vianity b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required E,~ S`~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use chang~ would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirect) The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant i pact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, i~pacts resulting from au quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Drnsion offices, 10500 Cmc Center Dnve (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Industral Area Speafic Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certfied June 15, 1994) (/) Other Biological Habitat Assessment (Compliance Biology, December 16, 2003) (/) Other Williams Chiao Architects, LLP (December, 2003) CJ ~I~ C~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Page 25 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have rewsed the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature T . ~^GGf~_~g'~/~Ai~ Date ~ ~ d Print Name and Title • C ~IJ ~ 1 DRCZvo3-o%/ S~~TpM /b3a3 comp(iance•biology • December 16, 2003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Joseph Ledesma Ledesma & Meyer Constructron Co., Inc. DEC 2 2 2003 9229 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Cabforma 91730 RECENED -PLANNING SUBJECT: Results of Habitat-Based Evaluation for Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly on a 4.27-acre Site, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, CA Deaz Mr. Ledesma, Tlus letter report discusses findings of a reconnaissance-level habitat evaluaton conducted to determine potential habitat swtabilrty or the federally-bsted endangered Dellu sands flower-loving fly (Raphiomulas terminahts abdomwnl~s) (DSF) on an approxunately 4.27-acre property located in the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cah[orma (Exhibit 1). The evaluaton also considered the habitat swtabil~ty for additronal special-status wildlife species known from the azea. . Introduction Compliance Biology, Inc understands that a development plan has been prepared on the subject property. The currently undeveloped property u located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Trademazk Pazkway North and 6a Avenue, at the northwest terminus of Winston Avenue (Exhibit 2). This report ~s intended to provrde the applicant and regulatory authonties w<th general biological informatron regazding potentially suitable habitat to support special-status wdd>fe species for use m evaluating potential consequences of Endangered Speaes Act compliance and permitting. Methods Literature Search Documentation pertinent to the biologrcal resources in the v~cuuty of the site was reviewed and analyzed. Infonnatron revrewed included: (1) the federal Regrster listing package for DSF; (2) literature pertauung to habitat requirements of special-status wildlife speoes potentially occumng on the subject property; (3) the Cahforrua Natural Ihvers~ty Database (CDFG 2003) information from the Ontano and Guasti USGS 7.Sminute quadrangle maps regazding special-status wddbfe specres potentially occumng on and adjacent to the proled site; and (4) review of available reports from this and other projects located in the general vicinity r1 u ~ ,~ ~0 euasiow 1 1 MINKLEY r I A BARSTOIV 1 , ~ XELF110PLE 1 ~ NEwOEPPv SPWNGS 11 1 1 I `\~_~ ~~ ~ r t$ 1 L. Nail ~'J i `~.!-J aflo GPAODE 1 PUELPNiO 1 ~ee~c `_~ PXELPN Ir XESPEflIP ~W /~~ /ICY FONiNiP I " 'NCPIPI / CHIN &'{ 1 y / ~ J ~ PIVEPSIOE OLTON CPONESP „ I ~Q `` _ ! % ~ \ I$ AfOFENO ~\ J VOLLEY r ® PROJECT LOCATION ® ze is o ze ~S ~ ~ SCet c IN YSFS BANIONG PALN SPPINGS I~Y~Trv M exJubd 1 Bgbnel Usatl~o ~~ \, ~1 fiUt SL ""'e° t ~ -: ' /!m hr a rs ~ I o ~ Ir ~ . sa ~ r.e.rra , a r i ; • ~~ ,...~. mn st L PROJECT - P LOCATION ~u~nulrt:..:_.. r a 1'rsrlc t ~ , s3 IntetM EIOWIe aNG. 10 @ye t~ Duarlo /W I AbOm Ouestl Rd ~_~.: 3 E ptrp0~ Dr m N D 2 ~ _ ~~ 01 < a ^ arto /nl'1 Alr t ~ D O O m I ~0 m m ~~ A lD E L ISt x ~ ' Jurupa St 15 Mlga lOn e/ ~'d _- sen x..m.m„o Cr.lus -- Pln.ibeCOeen ® ~ ® ~ \ ' \ ~1! - S®IGNMIIl6 CYI~!)f~ Pnl~ct vicinity s ~r l1 U t ,~ ~Oa Mr Ledesma December 16, 2003 Page 4 of 9 Field Survey Compliance Biology prmapal biologist David Crawford conducted areconnaissance-level field survey to evaluate potential habitat for DSF and other locallyoccurring special-status wildlife on December 12, 2003. ]vlr Crawford has observed DSF and other known special-status wildlife in the vicinity and is familiar with the biotic chazacteristics of habitat occupied by DSF, as well as other locally occurring species. The site was examined on foot by walking a series of transects across the subtect property. The primary obtective of the filed visit was to generally evaluate the site s potential to support DSF, and to evaluate habitat swtabihty for other potentially occumng sensitive wildlife species based on existing site conditions Plant and wildlife species present at the tune of the survey were identified to aide in the assessment of the overall habitat values. Weather conditions during the site survey included mostly cleaz skies, a slight breeze, and temperature approxunately 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Results Literature Search The literature seazch revealed that in addition to DSF, two bud species, two mammal species, and one reptile species considered to be of special-status by state and/or federal regultory agencies have . been recorded from the protect region. Attachment A provides details regazding the special-status wildlife speaes known from the area including then current status, habitat requirements, and then potential to occur on the subtect property Additionally, ahabitat-based evaluation for DSF was conducted on this site by Impact Soences, Inc in June, 2000. The report concluded that the subtect property had a low potential to support DSF based on existing vegetation, site disturbance history, and lack of records of DSF in the immediate vicinity. Field Survey The subtect property totals 4 27 acres and has been regularly disked and mowed for weed abatement Elevation at the site is approxunately 1080 feet above mean sea level. Curb and gutter are present along the western site boundary along Haven Avenue Exhibits 3 and 3a photograptucally illustrate existing condibons on site Informal Soils Analyse The US Depaztment of Agriculture Soil Survey for San Bernazdino County have mapped the site as supporting both Hanford sandy loam and Delhi fine sand series Though there aze some sandy soils on the site, the on-site evaluation indicated that the matonty of soils present on site have more of a loam element that would be expected m Delhi fine sands This is further indicted by the grasses • o>ma~•~ E,S(~3 Mr Ledesma December 76, 2003 Page 5 of 9 ~~-~x~d q, +, `br .tix~ M -x.`_. = a'v-.~`"''X~^F°FS°m °£ ,gym rs 4 a ~ ~ ° ~.~~. ' ._ -7i _ r EXHIBIT 3 ,~~~ nanp~~[e•6ldogy • • Mr Ledesma fkcember 16, 2003 Page 6 of 9 r 1 ~J EXHIBIT 3a 1~ ~ caodf~a biotaPl Mr Ledesrna December 16, 2003 Page 7 of 9 across the sate as these would not be expected to occur m such density m fine sands. Approxunately 10 percent of the slte contains exposed patches of soil Vegetation The subject pazcel ns dommated by non-native grasses and weedy annual specnes. Predommant grasses aze Bermuda (Cynodon dadylon), and brome (Bromus spp.) that form neazly a lawn effect. Annual specnes mlude non-native black mustazd (Brassrca mgra), bur-clover (Medreago polymarpha), filazee (Erodnum sp ), and Russnan thnstle (Salsola tragus). Native annuals present mclude western ragweed (Am6rosra psAostachya) and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandrflora). Vegetation mver on the sate totals approxunately 90 percent. WQAhfe Vertebrate wildlife observed on the sublecl property durmg the evaluation mcluded California ground squuiel (Spermoplulus 6eecheyn), Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), Amencan crow (Corpus brachyrhynchos), and yellow-nunped wazbler (Dendrmca coronata) Adcbtionally, a red-tailed hawk (Butte lamauxnsu) and a great egret (Casmerodrus albus) were observed flymg overhead Sunoundmg 11rnd Use The sate ns located m an azea of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga zoned for mmmeraal and fight mdustnal busmess Exnstmg development occurs to the north, and south of the sate Deposlhon of fill sods and prehmmary gradmg has begun on the pazcel to the east, and to the west, across haven, the sate ns currenUy under cultivation with cactus. Discussion Optimal DSF habitat ns chazaclenzed by low-growmg perennial shrubs lvnth frequent patches of exposed sandy sods. However, results of past focused DSF surveys m Ontano suggest that DSF may occur m azeas that do not support perennial shrubs, and that DSF may occur m suboptunal condntions Conversely, observations of a Kmgsley (1996) study suggest that both buckwheat and telegraph weed may be necessary for long-term surnval of DSF and that the arrangement and density of cover ns unportant. Kmgsley further suggests that bnolognsts would Lkely Enid more swtable DSF habntat where both of these plant specnes aze present m patchy arrangements, rather than on sates ~+nthout these specnes, or on sates that supoprt very dense vegetation. As stated m the DSF Recovery Plan (USFWS 1997), these plants may be present m low denslty. Moreover, snghtmgs of adults are more likely m relatively undcsturbed habntats, as mdncated by the presence of native annuals and perennials (USFWS 1997) Kmgsley concluded that DSF have very narrow habntat requiements that aze detennmed by appropnate plant specnes and open sand as defusing chazaclenshcs 1_ 1~+~^ o~mluxe•ekbyg • (\ J Mr l.edesma DeternEer76,2003 t~aors Invasrve non-native vegetation severely degrades or eliminates DSF habitat. Exotic plants may also alter soil moisture or make the substrate physically unswtable for the surnval of DSF and other natrve subterranean invertebrates (USFWS 1996, 1997). Mustazd and non-native annual grasses reduce vesrculaz-arbusculaz mymrrhva propagules and shrft the remauung forms to weedy mycorrhrzal fungr. Jf such invasive specres become predominant, they can arrest ecological sucoessron resulting m a permanent "annuahzation" of the area (Drake 1990) Conclusions Results of the habrtat-based survey indreate the subject site does not support high quality or optimal DSF habitat due to the prevalence of relatively dense grasses and weedy vegetation, exposure to yeazs of hrstonc disking and mowing, and relatrve isolation from undrsturbed or natural habitats. These drsturbanoe-related factors collectively contnbute to reduce the occurrence potential of DSF. Although the aforementioned srte condrtions are not chazactenstrc of optimal DSF habrtat, the srde does support a small amount of Delta serves sands wrth scattered natrve plant specre5 (eg. telegraph weed), whrch aze often analogous wrth occupred DSF habrtats. Notwrthstanding, the subject srte does not currently support optunal DSF habrtat and the site rs not connected by azeas of undeveloped open space to other azeas of hrgh quality or known occupred DSF habrtat. Further, since DSF was listed, no DSF have been observed wrthin the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on these factors and the results of the on-srte evaluation, the subject pazcel has a very low potential to support DSF. Additionally, no other special-status wildlife are expected to occur on site While the subject property has a very low potential to support DSF based on the ewsting environmental factors, defrmtrve conclusions relative to this species' presence or absence on site cannot be ascertained absent conducting focused protocol DSF surveys. As such, rt is possible that the US Frsh and Wildlife Sernce may not accept any efforts short of protocol surveys. Thank you for the opportunity to provide l.edesma & Meyer Constivction Company with biological sernces. If you have any questions regazding the results presented in this report, please feel free to contaM me Very truly yours, Dave Crawford Pnncrpal Brologst 1 ~ ~ 1 ~~•~ Mr Ledesma December 76, 2003 Page 9 of 9 REFERENCES California Natural Drversiiy Database (CNDDB). 2003. Computer reports for the Guasfi and Ontano, CA 7.5-mmute USGS quadrangle maps Drake, James. 1990. The Mechanics of Community Assembly and Succession. Journal of Theoretical Bwlogy: 147, pp. 213-233. ` Kingsley, Kenneth J 1996. Behaviour of the Dellis Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Drptera. Mydidae), a Tattle Known Endangered Species. Ann Entomological Sonety of America: 89(6): 883-891. U.S. Frsh and Wildlife Sernce. 1996. Interun General Survey Gwdehnes for the Dellis Sand Flower- Lovmg Fly (Raphwmulas tenninatus abdominalis). December 30, 19% U S. Frsh and Wildlife Sernce 1997. Dellis Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Raphromidas termrnatus abdomrnalrs) Recovery Plan U S Frsh and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. 51 pp. ~ L 1 ~ ~yj' ~.Mima Atl~g r~ u Attachment A Special-Status Wildlife Recorded Fmm the Project Region R~ Common Name Statue Sdenttfic Name Federal State Habitat Regniremente Potential Occurrence on the Project Site INVERTEBRATES Dells Sends flower-lovmq fly Fg _ Open, undisturbed sQUb Low potential Soils on sde have been lthaphiomidas terminatus ahdominalts habitats supporting Delhi subttutted to long-term disturbance, end Bite serves fine sands is dominated by non-native vegetation, no recorded sightings in vlcmity since apexes hated REPTILES Coast horned h7srd [FSC) CSC, CP Exposed gravelly-sandy Low potential Vegetation lilcely too dense Phrynosoma coronatum (full species) soils with mimmel end site too isolated to support species shrubs, npenan woodland deennga, dry cham~se chaparral, end annual grasslands with scattered seepweed or ealtbush. BIIiDS Western yellow-billed cuckoo (nesting) FC CE Ripenan forest nester, Not expected No suitable habitat on site Caccyzus amertcanus occtdentahs (full spaces) along the broad, lower flood-bottoms of larger nver systems Westem bunowmg owl (burrow sites) [FSC] CSC Grasslands end open Low potential Vegetation on site likely too Athena ctmiculana hypugea scrub tall and too dense to support speaea Site's proximity to freeway may further d~ssuede species from occurring. ~dh~•a~99 Attachment A (continued) Special-Status Wildlife Recorded Fmm the PmjeM Region rn Common Name gtalae SdrnHfic Name Federal Skate Habitat Requiremenla Potential Occurrence on the Project Site Celiforrua gnatcetcher FT CSC Coastal sage scrub in Not expelled. No suitable habitat on site Poltoptila rnhfornica areas of flat or gently eloping terrain MAMMALS Los Angeles pocket mouse [FSC] CSC Grasslands end coastal Low potential Vegetation likely too dense Pnognathue longtmnnbrts brwtnasus saga scrub, prefers lower and ante too disturbed end isolated to support elevahonal areas with species open ground end sandy soils. San Diego desert woodret [FSC] CSC Chaparral end coastal Not expected No sortable habitat on Bite Neotoma lep~da tntmnedm sage sQUb KEY: Federal - U S Fish and Wildlife Sernce FE Federally Endangered FT. Federally Threatened FC Federal Candidate for listing as threatened or endangered State - CelrforNa Department of Fieh end Game CSC: California Species of Special Concern CP; California Protected [FSC] Federal Spenes of Concern Speaes denoted with tlua term pnmanly include those considered C2 spades under the old dessihcation system Thie term ra only to be used es a "term-of-art" end rs not to imply any legal protection or mdusron on the Federal ESA list -® wmplknce•ddo99 • L J i (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigmficent effects would occur, and The following Negative Declaration is being ciroulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 o/the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 and Development Review DRC2003-01001 Public Review Period Closes: April 14, 2004 Project Name. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 660 feet south of 6th Street - APN 0210-081-26 Project Description' Subdivision of 4 27 acres of land into 4 parcels and a master plan and design review of 4 two-story office buildings totaling 66,190 square feet in the Haven Avenue Overlay Distract and Industrial Park Distract FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there ~s no substantial evidence that the protect may have a sigmficant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION Protect Applicant: William Chiao Architect, LLP (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment C J If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Envvonmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project Tile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Aoril 14. 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~~ ~\ RESOLUTION NO 04-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16323, A SUBDIVISION OF 4 PARCELS ON 4.27 ACRES IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN• 0210-081-26 A. ReGtals 1. Williams Chiao Architects, LLP, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323, as described m the tkle of this Resolution Hereinafter ~n this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together wrath public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to vacant property located on the east side of Haven Avenue, and generally south of 6th Street, and b. The site is presently vacant with non-native, sparse vegetation covenng the ma~orrty of the site To the north of the site is Haven Bwldmg Matenals supply yard To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark office/mdustnal park directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land, and The application proposes the subdivision of 4.27 acres into 4 parcels, and d The application, in conjunction vnth Development Review DRC2003-01001, proposes the construction of 4 professional office bwldmgs ranging in size from 14,074 square feet to 19,022 square feet, and e The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga ~,~ ~-a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-39 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP April 14, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent wrath the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map rs consistent wrath the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site rs physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision rs not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wnldlrfe or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map well not conflict wrath any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision ~~ 4 Based upon the facts and information contared in the proposed Mrtigated Negative Declaration, togetherwnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commissron finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect vvill have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEOA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Calrfomra Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~~~ ~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0439 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and condusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every cond~Uon set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Enaineenno Division 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance v~nth City Mayor Dmded Artenal standards induding: a) Provide and/or proted existing curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, and streetlights b) Provide nght turn lane for dove approach c) Proted or replace existing R26(s) "No Stopping" signs d) Protect or replace traffic sloping and signage, as regwred e) No new openings in Haven Avenue median 2) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicabonsand electncal, except for the 66tCV eledncal) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City poor to the approval of the final parcel map or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit times the length of the project frontage 3) Condwt for a future fiber optic cable link shall be installed vwthin the parkway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (V11QMP), to the satisfadion of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Predices (BMPs) on the grading plan 5) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WOMP shall be addressed in the prated Covenants, Conditions and Restndions (CCBRs) 6) In the event adtacent property owner develops vwth alternate design that indudes extending Winston Avenue, this developer shall deposit suffiGent cash to reimburse an adjacent developer for half the cost of construding a street along the entire prated frontage Said deposit, ar unused portions thereof, will be reimbursed once adtacent improvements have been installed 7) The final Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 shall be approved and recorded, poor to issuance of bwlding permits • E,S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0439 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP Apnl 14, 2004 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation AirQualrty 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condkion so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speufications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading pemtds, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern Califom~a Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as Gty Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply vnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follovnng provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if sik is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high Hnnds (i a ,wend speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance vnth Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board E,S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-39 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP . Apnl 14, 2004 Page 5 [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403. n Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemattve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construcLorrgrading plans inGude a statement that work crews vwll shut off equipment when not in use 10) All mdustnal and commercial fatalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged pencils (i e., in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All mdustnal and commercal fatalities shall designate preferential parlung for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commercal site tenants wrath 50 or more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate high effitaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane wnndows and weather-strapping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer well retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cuta3monga well Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification wnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point LI.~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-39 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources Hnthin the proled area Submit one copy of the completed report nnth onginal dlustretrons to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiwng 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstructron field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speGfic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (r a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followwng measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allowthe rapid removal of fossils wrath minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notdy the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated wrath water or other sod stabd¢ing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance vwih SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated with vehiGe traGung of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when Hnnd speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ~I ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-39 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP Apnl 14, 2004 Page 7 Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain preupitatron and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration mdude Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of grading pertmts, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that ident~es BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site rs under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. 3) Source control of BMPs (ID number SD-10 Site Design, SD-11. Roof Runoff, SD-12 Effluent Imgation, and SD-32. Trash EnGosures), shall be indicated on the preuse Grading Plans submitted for Plan Check 4) Treatment Control BMPs (number TG30 Vegetated Swale) shall be indicated on the preuse Grading Plan submitted for plan check 5) Manual BMPs (number MP MP-40 Media Filter) shall be indicated on the preuse Grading Plan submitted for plan check 6) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wall be used on-srte to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the mawmum extent pradiuable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent v~nth the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopmenf adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga rn June 2000 7) Pnorto issuance of grading or paving pertmts, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Crty Engineer for coverage underthe NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday L ~ ~ rl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-39 SUBTT16323 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS, LLP April 14, 2004 Page 8 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified rn Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Planning Dvision Said consultant shall report then findings to the Planning Division v~nthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Dvision If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced rn intensity to a level of compliance vnth above noise standards or halted 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certrfy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissron of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissron held on the 14th day of April 2004, by the following vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-01001 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported . 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelmes As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be avatlable from the City upon request at the following address' City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency • Planning Droision 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~t~ ~o DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Williams Chaio Architects, LLP Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the CilystafPs ~s needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form: 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. r1 L_J The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff ume to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9. In those instances regwnng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits t~~ ~\ • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01001 and SUBTPM323 ~ Applicant: Williams Chalo Architects, LLP Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn. Assciate Planner Date: November 12. 2003 m ICp AirQuality' a"' ~ r`.~r~.~~~~~~"~?'~s -• - All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speatications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City veril~cation Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Revew of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rute 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or - high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Revew of Plans A/C - 4 throw h seedin and watenn - _ • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 1 of 7 nixx vl U' - . -• • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C R areas to erosion over extended mods of time eview of Plans A/C 2/4 Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en meenn ractices - - • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public Dunng A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction - Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , gO/CE C wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Dunng A 4 Rule 403 re wrements Construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods gO/CE C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means Construction The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C - 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Revew of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes). All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C Z3 preferential parking for vanpools • 2~ ~ r~ vl r • s . ...- ... . ... . . . . .... -. . . .: . . Ail industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D Z3 mare employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercal site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters _ All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping hiUltUfal Reaources _ `-i ~r as fi ~ =`w'aa°`'° ~;:2wa.,` 5;...~i,ks'.-±%nF'bk `'°f`f i:.'44x /. ;> ~,ry aa'~ r-''a`-q~k < X-a. £+9-GndaT a.' ti', '~s"a~:'.. ~t{.{ i+~.S '~.[~e[a~Ya'd(i `~' ~'r v srt~~ <n~•~~4~ , ~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualdied archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of Report A/D 3/4 sties from demolition or significant modrfication without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Rewew of Report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the CPBO C Rewew of Report A/D 3/4 archaeolo ical herita a of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of Report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropriate CEQA _ _ _ _ wdelines 3of7 rn '~'n V\ ~ . .. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of Report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archwin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of Report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specdic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological momtonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B RewewofReport A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin actiwties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of Report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology ariii Solls`° - '# ~~ ~ " ~ ' ° ~ "r ~ ' ~ The site shall be treated with water or other sod BO/CE C During A - 4 stabilizing agent (approved bySCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o Construction emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 4 of 7 m (`~ ~ • . .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During q q RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrolajyand;Wate~O,uality~` =~'rTk-~ ~ ~,2 ;~~~~~~'~ Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C ~ 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Source control of BMPs, (ID number SD-10 Site CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 Design, SD-11 Roof Runoff, SD-12• Efficient Irrigation, - and SD-32 Trash Enclosures), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plans submitted for plan check Treatment Control BMPs (number TC-30 Vegetated CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 - Swale), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check Manual BMPs (number MP-40 Media Filter), shall be CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check 5 of 7 • - -. .. Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identdying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants mto the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identdythe structural and - - non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimmation System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtamed (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8'00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, Construction mcluding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday ~hh W T • bpi • f ! ~ Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specfied in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Mondonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report then findings to the Planning Diwsion within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~~ ~\ (~ 7 of 7 •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Tentative Parcel MaD 16323 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: Williams Chian Architects LOCATION: East of Haven Avenue, south of 6th Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the aRemative, to relmquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first D. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the SC-1-04 1 Comoletion Date ~~- ~~_ ~_~_ i ~plenningUmal~pingcommtsubtpm 16323cond 4-74 doc ~ ~ Prolecl No SUBTPM16323 overhead structure shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reaprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint malntenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map '2 All existing easements lying wdhin future rights-of-waq shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 3 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty 4. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs F. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Councl Resolution No 81i-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one budding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by condtions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the bwldings or unds be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements requred by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 6 Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trell Other Haven Avenue X X c X X X (e) Notes (c), if so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114, (e) right tum lane Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Clwl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer SC-1-04 Completion Date ~~ ~~- ~~ ~~- ~ ~~- ~~ ~J ~~. / / ~~- ~~ i \planning\hnal\pingcomm\subtpm 16323cond 4-14 doc E \ S \V Protect No SUBTPM16323 Comolefion Dale d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all comers of Intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelrnes and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street . improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a Ilne item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend" Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The CIty Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables Far additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Common Grow Street Name Botanical Name Name Spaee Spacing Size cxy. Haven Avenue Foreground P A 8' or greater, Magnolia grandlflora NCN 8' 60' O C 15 FIII generally In front 'Magestic Beauty' Intentionally Gal In of sidewalk spaced this far apart 20'OC P A Less than 8' Magnolia grandlflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 FIII 'St Mary' Gal In Primary tree In Brachychiton Bottle 8' 25' O C Informal If 15 FIII masses, mainly populneus Tree maintained by CIty Gal In behind sidewalk Winston Avenue Pinus canariensis Canary 8' 25' O C 15 FIII Island Gal In Pine SC-1.04 -~-~- -~-~ / / / / -~-~. -~-~. / / I \planning\final\pingcommisubtpm 16323cond 4-14 doc ~ ~ ~ '~ \ Protect No SUBTPM16323 Comolebon Date Construction Notes far Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods repprt shall be furnished to f a • ill soil y regwre back the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient deficiencies amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Drvtsion 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required G. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the follo~nng street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue H. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from ad/scent areas ' I. Improvement Completion 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _I_/ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for Haven Avenue J. Utilities t Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sandary sewerage system, water, gas, /_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them SC-1-04 i \planning\finallpingcommisubtpm 16323cond 4-14 doc 4 ~~ 1~ Probed No SUBTPM16323 •K. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bwldmg permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administratNe fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submtted to the Engmeering Diwsion when the first budding permit application is submitted to•Buddmg and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • SC-~-oa Comolehon Date -/-/- -/-/- i \planning\final\pingcommisubfpm 16323cond 4-14 doc ~ `~ `~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS December 5, 2003 Palmea Business Center FJS Haven, S/O 6"' DRC2003-01001 & SUPTPM16323 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustrial protects is 300- feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet ~ b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public • roadways. 2. At intersections. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any budding f. If any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow • 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. t ~~ ~~ 4. On all site plans to be submitted for rewew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shalt submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: t. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System i RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 Pnor to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191.10.200. t Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1s1 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 46-feet d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the dnwng surface shall not exceed 12%. ~ Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum M of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 2 ~,=T °~S 3 Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings. 5 CommerciaUlndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District StandSrd #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of requred width. c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet. d. Gates are not regwred to be motorized. 6 Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must bb clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternatroe Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products Magneswm Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards Open Burning • Battery Systems Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate Powder Coating • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures 3 ~ ~~ \`l' • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ' 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized unttl the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency'Plan. Cahforma Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased aroaertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business ~s subi~ct to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Altemate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access• a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line; or c. Is shared by multiple owners, or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to • recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino ~,~ ~~ To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all a . properties included in the agreement b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement th dth t rn ~ad i and Di t t th f th F l h i h e wi , u i rac access, o e ire s c. A scaled site p an s ow ng t e pa slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required prroate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Provide service to adjacent properties; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded vyithin the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delroerang any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect The required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. . 5 ~ ~ ~ \~L~ 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access . roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflectroe Hydrant Markers°. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3 Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of ail regwred fire access roadways. 6 ~~J ~\ 9. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible ~ from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10. Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciallindu~trial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with ' large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings. The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11. Hazardous Materials: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services 13. Inspector. Mapping Site plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" • x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be rewsed by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 7 ~ `~ I w RESOLUTION NO 04-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2003-01001, FOR 4 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS, TOTALING 66,190 SQUARE FEET ON 427 ACRES IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-081-26 A Recitals 1 Williams Chiao Architects, LLP, filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-01001, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it ~s herebyfound, detertnined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 Thrs Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speufically finds as follows a The application applies to vacant property located on the east side of Haven Avenue and generally south of 6th Street, and b The site is presently vacant wrath non-native, sparse vegetation covenng the ma~orrty of the site To the north of the site is Haven Budding Matenals supply yard To the east is vacant land and to the south is vacant land with the Trademark officeAndustnalyark directly south Across Haven Avenue to the west is vacant land, and c The application is m contunction wdh the subdivision of 4 27 acres into 4 parcels ranging m size from 92 acre to 1 66 acre, and d The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets or exceeds all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The project will provide warehousing/distnbution and manufactunng facilities for industnal uses of incubator and start-up to moderate size, convernently located relative to the industnal area and regional circulation routes, and E,S 101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS April 14, 2004 Page 2 f The architectural design of the protect incorporates stonework, reflective glazing, plaster accents, and metal work Each building has 360-degree architecture, thereby meeting the design goals of the Industrial Park Distract by providing ahigh-level of architectural design with building entrances that are well articulated 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed protect is consistent wrath the obtedrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord wrath the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance wrath each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, together wrath all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect well have a significent effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negatwe Decaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negatwe Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that well result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect well have potential for an adverse impact upon wnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~~ 1~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS . Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 af~ove, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condd~on set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~a Division Undulating berms shall be provided in the landscaped setback area along Haven Avenue Berms shall have an average height of 3 feet, and final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall indicate the regwred bermng 2 Tables, chairs, and shade shall be provided in each employee outdoor eating area 3 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design incuding seating benches, trash receptaGes, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, Tight bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be compatible v~nth the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding pernds 4 Textured pavement shall be provided across arculation aisle, pedestnan walkway, and plaza They shall be of bnck/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits. 5 All future budding pads shall be seeded and imgated forerosion control Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and imgation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits 6 The lighting facture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall inGude the plaza area lighting fixtures, bwlding lighting fixtures (extenor), and parlung lot fighting fixtures Enaineenna Division 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City Mator Divided Artenal standards including a) Provide and/or protect existing curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, and streetlights b) Provide nght tam lane for dnve approach • c) Protect or replace existing R26(s) "No Stopping" signs d) Protect or replace traffic stnping and signage, as regwred e) No new openings in Haven Avenue median EIS 10~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS April 14, 2004 Page 4 • 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the Gty prior to the approval of the final Parcel Map or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit times the length of the protect frontage 3) Condwt for a future fiber optic cable link shall be installed within the parkway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfacton of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan 5) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions and Restncbons (CC&Rs) 6) In the event adtacent property owner develops with alternate design that includes extending Winston Avenue, this developer shall deposit sufficient cash to reimburse an adjacent developer for half the cost of constructing a street along the entire protect frontage Said deposit, or unused portions thereof, will be reimbursed once adtacent improvements have been installed • 7) This development shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required drainage easement from the property to the east, prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever comes first 8) The final Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 shall be approved and recorded, prior to issuance of budding permits Environmental MdigaUon Arr Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the pro/ect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California Air Quality Management • District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff ~ S 1C`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS Apnl 14, 2004 Page 5 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed perfomtance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply wrath SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall incude the follownng provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seedrng and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule adrvities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt ~s tamed overto adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a • result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , Hnnd speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated v~nth water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpmentwhen not in use 10) All industnal and commercial facilities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 . minutes) 11) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools E,S ILS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 12) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high effiGency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stopping Cukura/ Resouroes 1) If any prehrstonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study Wrth the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wall • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significent modification without an opportunity for the Gty to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological hentage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehrstonc resources, following appropnate CEOA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources ~nnthrn the pro)ect area Submit one copy of the completed report with ongrnal illustrations to the San Bernardino County Arohaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudron field survey of the pro)ect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the following measures ~J E,S loo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS Apnl 14, 2004 Page 7 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties Should fossils be found Hnthm an area ,being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the mdmtor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speumens oath a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Gty to reduce PM10 emissions assoGated wrath vehiGe tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration mGude Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and becks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP) that identifies BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer 3) Source control of BMPs (ID number SD-10 Site Design, SD-11 Roof Runoff, SD-12 Efficient Imgation, and SD-32 Trash Enclosures), shall be indicated on the grease Grading Plans submitted for Plan Check ~jlo~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS April 14, 2004 Page 8 4) Treatment Control BMPs (number TG30 Vegetated Swale) shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check 5) BMPs (number MP MP-40• Media Filter) shall be indicated on the precse Grading Plan submitted for plan check 6) Prior to issuance of bwlding pemnts, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a pro/ect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that well be used on-sde to reduce pollutants into the stone dram system to the mawmum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wrath the Gurdel~nes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2000 ~ Pnorto issuance of grading or paving pertrots, applicant shall submdto the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply wrath obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Stone Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pertmt Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speufied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as speGfied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be required by the Plamm~g Diwsion Said consultant shall report their findings to the Plamm~g Dmsion wnthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ IVV PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-40 DRC2003-01001 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS • Apnl 14, 2004 Page 9 BY Richard MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certdy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r~ t. E,~S ICS City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-01001 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary ~ This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive . Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~~ IIU DRC2003-01001 AND SUBTPM16323 Williams Chaio Architects, LLP Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists wtll be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activties and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further morntonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form'. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for morntoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Duector or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits ~,~ 11~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01001 and SUBTPM323 Applicant: Williams Chafo Architects, LLP Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn. Assciate Planner Date: November 12, 2003 rn N i - •• .. . Air Quality ,. r~a~,-.,-y,~. . i~ .. :,t~~~ ara. 3 u.~.a~~z .r', aq''~. , ~i ~ C :k1 ~ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP ., ti, , C Review of Plans A/C CL °SU ~. 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficatwn Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, _ or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAOMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or - high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 throw h seedin and watenn - - - • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 1 of 7 • S • .. . . -. .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work enods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound _ en ineerin radices - Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C D by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public uring A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , g0/CE C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 re wrements Construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods g0/CE C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all mactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C - 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools 2 of 7 i • . - ~. . .. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans A/C Z3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Revew of Plans C y4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualitied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modrfication without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 - incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the CP/BO C Revew of Report A/D 3/4 archaeolo ical herita a of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C RewewofReport A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA _ _ wdelines _ _ 3 of 7 r1"h vl ,,in V i • . .. : .. ~ .. ... .. . . .- . . . . .. . . • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of Report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of Report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wail also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and CP B Review of Report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunn the interval of earth-disturbin activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 or graded, droert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of Report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens wiih a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods ~ ~ ~ ~z '~~•~ ~' _*'• s~ Ky '~ yr~"y -$N s , ~ The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil ofi-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 4 of 7 _rn p • - -. .. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Y 9Y andWat >~~.a~~~ H droto er Quality ~ : ~ , ~ 'x~, a ,. ~ ,<,~~`v'S : ~ M= ~, t ~ , ~ ~,<< ~., ~,< ` - ~ a <~~ . ~z , ti.. :~ ;~ `~ . . ,. ., ~ f.a ~a' , ~, ,n ~ ~ , ~ Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 prepare a SW PPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Source control of BMPs, (ID number SD-10 Site CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Design, SD-11 Roof Runoff, SD-12 Efficient Irrigation, - and SD-32 Trash Enclosures), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plans submitted for plan check Treatment Control BMPs (number TC-30 Vegetated CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 - Swale), shall be indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check Manual BMPs (number MP-40 Media Filter), shall be CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 indicated on the precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check • 50 7 • i • • .. ~ . -. . .: .. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and _ _ _ non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to complywith obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit •'~ , ~. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a na4onalhohday rn J~ 6 of 7 •- ~. .. Constructton or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ ;, ~"' "" " si ~ sMonftorln0 F~,~aq~ no"y y~;~y~'',r ,e '^ ~ ~~ i,Method~f,Ve~Hl~a,..~n ~ A ~ ~ .~ ~~ ,T- ~ of olis~~ '~ ~;.` "-`. ~, , ~' •. - CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A • On-stte Inspection - 1 • Withhold Recordation of Flnal Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 - W Ithhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building OHiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit br Bonds FC - Flre Chief or designee 6 • Revoke CUP 7 -Citation m P 7 of 7 • • ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Review DRC2003-01001 SUBJECT: Office Bwldmgs APPLICANT: William Chiao Architects LOCATION: East of Haven Avenue, South of 6th Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comole6on Date ~ 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-40, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Haven Overlay District . 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-04 1 i\planning\final\pingwmm\dre2003-0~001cond4-14 doc ~ \~ \\~ Project No DRC2003-01001 Comole6on Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and _/_I_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Build ng and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance pr~or to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be I /_ submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance Huth ail sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, inGuding a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _I_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect ad/scent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_I_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits ~ 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_I_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete ~ or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- ' family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_I_ including proper dlummation 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured /_/_ products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be - included in building plans 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors E. Parki ng and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _I_I_ a budding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01001 condo-14 doc 2 ~~ \ ~~ Protect No DRC2003-01001 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaceslplazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commerctal and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, addrhonal storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office bwldtngs and other non-residential development G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commerctal and office protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bulding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be • installed by the developer prior to occupancy SC-1-04 i \plamm~g\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01001cond4-14 doc ~ ,~ \2\ Comole4on Date /_/. /_/_ / I / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / I / I / / / / / Proied No DRC2003-01001 Comolehon Date 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope are , 1-gallon or larger size ~ addition, slope banks shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover I in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rack, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intens~ed landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the i _/_/_ perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment It located in public maintenance areas, the i _/_/_ ~ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/~ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _I_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall compiywith the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the pro/ect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of ail mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for ~ mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the SC•1-04 i lplanning\final\pingwmm\dre2003-01001contl4-14 doc `~ ~~ \~~ Prgect No DRC2003-01001 ComoleGOn Date • overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map ' 2 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map , 3 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public nght-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 4 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs L. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Counal Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bulding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Counal, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance: of all improvements requred by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Streel Lights Street Trees Comm Troll Median Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X X c X X X (e) Notes (e) right tum lane Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required SC-1-04 Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / / i \planning\fnal\pingcomm\dre2003-01001 wnd4-14 doc v l- ` J 1 V~ Prgect No DRC2003-01001 Comolehon Date Stgnal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of th street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engine~r Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer ,. f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards m accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend" Where public landscape plans are requved, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Common Grow Street Name Botanical Name Name Spaee Spacing Size Qty Haven Avenue Foreground P A 8' or greater, Magnolia NCN 8' 60' O C 15 Fill generally in front 9randiflora Intentionally Gal In of sidewalk 'Magestic Beauty' spaced this far apart 20'OC P A Less than 8' Magnolia NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Fill grandiflora Gal In 'St Mary' Primary tree in Brachychiton Bottle 8' 25' O C Informal if 15 Fill masses, mainly populneus Tree maintained by City Gal In behind sidewalk Winston Avenue Pinus canariensis Canary 8' 25' O C 15 Fill Island Gal In Pine SC-1-04 ~ ~_ -- • / / / / / / / I i I I i i -~-~- u \`'\~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01001wnd4-14 doc ~ \ ~ `~ ` Project No DRC2003-01001 ComoleGOn Date Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ctty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficienaes may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or Industrial drveways may have lines of sight plotted as required M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to foin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adtacent areas O. Improvement Completion ~ 1 If the regwred public Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, - I_/_ an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for Haven Avenue P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _I_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from ail utilities and other interested agencies Involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them i 1 SC•1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01001cond4-14 doc ~ \~ ~~ Prgect No DRC2003-01001 Comolehon Date Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is prowded to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Droision within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition prot®ct APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be prowded by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire i development S. Security Hardware ' 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/~ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used T. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ wsibdity 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be _/_/_ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. SEE ATTACHED sc-~ -oa i \plannmg\final\pingcomm\dre2003-01001 wnd4-14 doc 4~ \~ \~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS December 5, 2003 Palmea Business Center E/S Haven, S/O 6m DRC2003-01001 & SUPTPM16323 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaUindustrial projects is 300- feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: • 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways 2. At intersectiohs. 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4. As requred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any budding f If any portion of a faality or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provde required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. ~ ~S \2`~ 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. . FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the appli ant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, thg 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fue alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or s4ite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained. Plans and specfications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 ' FSC-6 Fire District Site Access • Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drroe aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191.10.200 1 Location of Access: All portions of the structures 15` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radds shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire • Department apparatus E ,S \2~ 3 Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be • provided as follows. a In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings 4 Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings 5 CommerciaUlndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire Distract Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply: a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width. c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet. d Gates are not regwred to be motorized. 6 Fire Lane Identification. Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. • FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the judgment of the Fue Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products Magneswm Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • • Fruit Ripening Plants Hazardous Materials Structures Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported 3 • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Wood Produ,Cts/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San (Bernardino J The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dw~s~on at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the CaUEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. Californa Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality. 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased gropertv which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of • egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c. Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to • recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. 4 E,~ \`~ To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal. a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement• The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances ' a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Provide service to adfacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards. Approval of the on-site (prvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Droision and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the project The required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 5 E,~ \3\ 3. Construction Access. The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surfac of the road. 4 Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. ~ 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially corrapleted in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or drroeway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hmng the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler morntonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fir: access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 6 ~ ~ ~ 1~~ 9. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address • with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-mch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaUindustnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated dunng periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 11. Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subtect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17 site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. ~ l ~ \J ' t h e c i t y o f Rancho Cucamonga Staff Report DATE Apnl 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16369 - CHARLESJOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 4 23 acres of land into 6 parcels m the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue - APN 0229-321-10 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01007 - CHARLESJOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a master planned mdustnal protect containing 6 Industnal bwldmgs totaling 81,812 square feet on 4 23 acres of land m the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue - APN 0229-321-10 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Sun-oundmg Land Use and Zomno North - Vacant, General Industnal (Subarea 14) South - Vacant and Industnal Bwidings, General Industnal (Subarea 14) East - Vacant, General Industnal (Subarea 14) West - Vacant and Utility Comdor and Day Creek Flood Control Channel, General Industrial (Subarea 14) B General Plan Designations Protect Site - General Industnal North - Generallndustnal South - Generallndustnal East - Generallndustnal West - Generallndustnal C Site Charactenstics The site is surrounded by Industnal development to the north, south, and east A utility Comdor containing power transmission lines and Day Creek flood control channel exists to the west Evidence of reoccumng disang for fire abatement purposes is evident The site presently drams from the northwest to the southwest, with an overall fall of 2 to 3 feet D Parkmg Calculations All proposed parcels would be developed with regwred parking for their assoaated bwldmgs There is enough parking for each parcel and approved land use There will also be reaprocal vehicular access between all of the parcels The total regwred parking for the protect is 265 stalls with a total 267 proposed parking stalls In addition to the above parking requirements, one semi-trailer parking space is regwred for each dock-high door The protect is in conformance with this regwred ratio of truck stalls ITEMS F and K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16369 AND DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A Parcel Map In contunction Hnth the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel map to divide the site into six parcels, one for each budding The Development Code exempts the protect from the minimum parcel size regwrements because it is a master planned development B General The infill industnal development contains six small sized bwldings, which range in size from 9,526 square feet to 19,617 square feet Access into the protect site is via Santa Anita Avenue Additionally, the applicant has provided an outdoor employee area forthe protect The protect also has an associated parcel map for each budding and assocated parking The buildings have a 360-degree architectural theme that includes decorative details, recessed blue reflective glavng, and sandblasted concrete, wdh a multi-color paint scheme Over each pnmary entry way is a metal clad canopy with steel suspension rods Note All elevations of Budding 6 are drawn incorrectly and would actually be a reverse of that shown C Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on February 17, 2004, and recommended approval of the protect to the Planning Commission (Exhibit "F") D Technical and Grading Review Committees The Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study, and found that there could be a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality dunng site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant impact If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369, and Development Review DRC2003-01007 through the adoption of the attached Draft Resolutions of Approval with Conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaraton. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Cdy Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" -Parcel Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "D" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated February 17, 2004 Exhibit "G" -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for DRC2003-01007 Draft Resolution of Approval SUBTPM16369 F, ~ 2 ~J ~- o ~ __ 5 v~ o yx tla ~ • ~ N o ` Z g~ sg li j ?~~6 yy~'. f~tl ~ o ec ~S tl~ SQy! tom' 'j- E ~' - F E ~y~i~~l i~~~e'~ ~~~Z e y~ pt6 ~ e SRI /, !, {' r[ p • z~ g.~ i2~ @ppp .pge 'tl Q~B~~Qi5@piQ ~ ~S n °~ _ .~ ~e 1 ~ _ ~ _ ti ~_7~4 i ~~ .iii /fib°m ~/ I ' z° 4 ~- ~ i~ / ig ~ I .J I ' ~ ~.J'y({'N ~~ ~ G 1 ~ I ~! -F I ITS [ ~ Q' e ^' ~ + ,_ •0 ~ I wl • I ' 1' ~ -_- _ - ~ 1~ <- ~r1. ~ ~kk m. rtu Ihm i ', man J- ~ n.we i FAN ~1 ~ _ a S ! I ~ I, ;~ z~• ~~~~ i~,t( I \ Nat) ~ 1 N It ~ ~} ~~~ Ir ,.~Wa _ ti -~--- ~ y) I ''i va;d '~ c°ii 3s ' C I ~ _ .. e~ '~F ~ ~ ' 1 ~~ " ~ 0. ' 1 d ~~ ` ~~ ~~ ~~~ ' ~ k- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ t ~ a ~ , ,~,rl, II §..p..e....,. i . a ~I a ~ I ~~ qq ~ I ~ ~Ji I I _ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~ (h 6 9~ @ . '. -----'- --n---1 ___''_^--'~ --- --'~---_-----'--=-- -- ' -' -------- e a ''-+-ti' I ' ' i . ~~ LI 'H' uwme I- I i ; _ _, - ~ a}i}lq4~~aeaa9s~i@§e~Fa -_--_ - ---'~L~ _-'~~K `ms=s _-~ ~'.Pr-i+w~=- ----~'~-^"'--- i E i Ip ~--- _ - - _- -I~ ~- <-•- ---- - 1-"F_~ E - (~ a jzc~o re~ _ ail ~. Y ) - p p C i -__ _- s._~=..iAZ..s„--~ ;----~'- -----z---- ------- -- -a =-=: - _`--- `9_ikQ6lo ~p~1ya~@ a~ 11 ~$ r ~ ~ ~ ~ 'aglY9J.799SJ AQ'- •~--v..••~•••:r-~-°' RGBBB9~~~9~9~39~99B~e€~ __ _ i i ~~-'IOYYN09 POOY A]111109 OwU}R/NU9B ;M6 ~ . _-~_ - u~ I ' •' ' _%_~~..__..._a--..-~~ _ _ J __...r_..._._...__.r~_ v. iae.eeesPvvetO_.i.v~ ~. ..v --__-_-~. _ -__~Y__ __ M1__L- - - --_ -_~_ __ ~l ~ 6 "a 9 >3 ~$ ~ s aa ~9 A & 0 5 ~ ~ 9 'a ae p A f ~ ® ~ i ~ n '} £ i3 9 5 i 'a a 's i `s °e C e ~~ y - z = ~~ a - x n - ° ~~ z c d d a ~a C 8 Y k M y L ~S 4 h 4 A 4 4 ~ i y i y ~ ~ o ~OrJ~ ~ ea ~ m L/I °~si,: g iris list ;~ ~ s 4Fo ~9 E 3~ t 9D .1 i- - -~""" o s t `' - we~ammroT vur«wsueumK m.nw as SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 1- _-__- I r~------ I I I I r ~ ~~ ~~ r I CI Lq ~I LI ~- I r CI L F- ~ it i _~ ~ ~ a~ S N N ._ GTIL11llJ ~ 1 ]III I i lrl ~ ~ o m ~ ~~ i ~ ~I ~~( + B \ ~ ~ I O'_I~~L_l m II ~ - I I - B ~~ SANTA ANITA AVENUE I I IIWII it II II ITI II II II ® -mv_--v- o-- B®BB®®®B @BB BBBBB BB iii~~~'i~~~lii,i~;ii i9i+ligi,i~i~i~i+.. aii t t•i,io ~. i ii~ii iiii' i~~ ~~€~ iii !a 9 ~ 1 SANTA ANITA INDUSTRIAL PARK SNYDER LANGSTON OPERON GROUP INCNO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA WARE MALCOMB SAN B ~J • • v~r+aodim~ 'vowowv~no oNOnva t0 [LWlV1LN8f15llNNIVId mO pp tOWOYJMp fi1~I0 ~'I~Y~I ~2ItfM _ dnOMJ NON3d0 Nou~rm es3aurs - ' ~ . i~ _ 6 v NiNd IVRllSf10N1 VlIMl tl1NVS o~a~rn~s uom3~x3 i ;e Q P ~ ~ e ~ i I F B6 I ~9 !5 iF9 ppy B ' 33~~' E6 p = §6a! e g E' ! i ~ acet~6 a { ([ 33~ ~~CiEj~4~IF i 3 1 ~ z P414~~1 BBB~BB88E®BB®® w ~ © ~ eeeeeo a m ~ o ~~ o` ~ F- ~~ r- ~~ F ~ ~ w ffi w ~ w s r ~ m ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ o-- g s ~ ~ ' o-_ m 9 s a- ~ . m _ - -__ m m ~ a i _ i O- ~ '~ , ~ ~ ~ i i ~ I i o-- ~ ~ b b 1' ~ J -~ --~ oaeeee ~ ~~ °1E'e°._ ~E~ ~ I' o E E E~oes = gs~l'e ~ ~ i~ •~ A ~ N ~~~ ---0 --~ ---0 SANTA ANRA INDUSTRVLL PARK SNYDER LANGSfOU OPERON GROUP --O -~ --0 ®®®®®eeeeeeeee m °~~ s'ii'Ea;l9 ii~~'~E 9a #s~ ~jiEi6 ~~~ i' Z 6~ s ~ ~ ~ 4 WARE MALCOMB VINNO~IIYJ VJNOWYJf1,70MJNVtl S ~ Ch ~~~~TT r^~r~~~t !~`* _ dfgMJ NOL3d0 ~Y`IOJ 1Y YY .1Q~A~ NO1S'JNYI N3OAN9 ~ I ~ HNVd ltlRilSfl~Nl tlllNtl tllN'dS ~~~~n i~~ Q ~~ .ia~.~. ~~ a ~~ I i 1 i ~ p~ ; , t ~ i4RJl~ ti !~i !}~~~f g 5so~ ' w ~al~~ ii~@9cIlE~'Be~ g ~ ! o ~~9Rl~~ BBBBBBBBB®®®®© ~ p s eeeeee o-- o- o- o- o- o- o- o- a -O eeees©~ ~~~ ®~'®eefieE~el~~ iyip~ $ 16 ~4" 0 gr o i c Ii~~r'ilri ~it $ ire.. ~ IJ'ii~ i"1 ~! ~ ~Iitr~ °i ~I i ~ r! i C i I i t ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ems. SANTA ANITA INDUSTRIAL PARK a _ ; ~ sNVOeRLANCSroN - WARE MA_LCOMB A Y ~ OPERON GROUP ~~ = _ Y- { RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ola~atom cuwwaiwmwmi~a terr--, sue. ^ NNNO~IIVJ 'MFNIgW~fIJ OH7M g~0~1~~~ ~~M df10L`J NON3d0 NO1S`JNVl N3OANS N2Md T1RiLSf10Nl tl11Ntl tl1NtlS . ~®~ . ~a.~. v e A I S t m E!o f3~~0~ ~l=.~ ~,Ioj;iliF `6irE3~i!>;6~6ce eaeaeeeeae®®®® gll'COlV1LN&5 `JMNIVN 100LOW0A Mp1Y/39 tlp1lp1X3 ~ ' ~ ! t 1 3 ~ icj~ i 0 66e" y2j a eel~il ~ 9 ~ ffi 29iCi1! ~~ ~ eeeeee 3~O • .L'" o---- --- a- a- C~ o--- c~-- i~, ~ o--- ~i `F '& gLITOlY1LI10116 DHNlVb LOpICfL __ naaoirly~ v~aowr~n~ oa~ava ` = CO gYQO~'I~LV ~VtN - df Wa J NOa3d0 r+o~srornnaaaws ~' 4 ~ HMtld TdR11Sf1ONl tlllNtl tllNb'S viaL~n3v uom~z3 I i ~ Q em. R 1 O 9 { ~ ~ k ~~~~ 1 ' ~1l~1 1~ t ~ l Q W aae13E i e Ely~ l 6 y9 1 F e{ {~!I O o5~~6le f ~eis ~ i ~ 1 eeeeeeaeaee®®~ , Q ~ ~ 0888e0 O- o-- ~" O- O- O- ~- f=-, ~~ ~ ~- O-- 0--- ~-- 0---- ~~~~ • • i • • q4'W lYL11191R ONMIVV f-Y10mOCJlp [[~~~~T rr~~r~~~~~tt YINtlOjI1WJ Y'JNOWYJfYJ ON'JNVtl }i a Y\IO.J'IYYY '~ZI~M _ NOlS'JNV1tl3UANS fit F(y _ ~2itldTdRilSflONItllIMltllNtlS ~euoauaor.ovre iii a { ~ 9 ~ ~ 1~ ~66c~l:~~l~ eaeee eeee® ~~ o 9 m U [O Q ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .. ... ~ ' Y . . i h i ~ ~ ?~ °ffi ~ m;,$ ~~~ ~ Z w e 1 e < < < ~~ i • ~~ ~O LIW lY1LIIBl15 `JIYfMb /DO40fGGOq _ hr+aojrno 'vonowvono oH~va , i M anoaoNOaaao Cryy gW ~.7Z~~ '~~/h _ roO~tm a3aaas 9: r 9 Q NiNd TdRLLSflaNl tlllNtl V1M/S 1 ~ 1 MlN UOOUSaMR111B : 1 E g ~i ~ is li;~~7EcB~~ {iic~lc~cl~ eases eases ~1 _ MILW T'1L11&IS UlYIIlYtl lWLptO®Ip __ _ VINLOjIN'J V'JNOYIVJfI'J OIYJNtltl ' L ~ flWOJ`It~W ~2I~dM _ enoa~raa3do NO1S'JNY1 M30ANS ~ 9 (Y NNtld lM2i1Sf10Nl tlllNtl tllM/S ~vu uovu~ora~re ~ i ~ Q LJ • °' i ~ ~ ~ ri ~i6~~lei~l~ BBBL-1B BB99® ~L \` b<LW ~ILIWBfI6 ptlNHIL1 LOGIP[002;R10 YINUO~IIYJ 'NJNOWYJfI'J OH~MM ' ~ ~ dN01S~JM/1 N30AN5 ~ (y HWOO'ItFW ~2IVM - ~' Q MNd NI2ilSf10Nl tllIN'd tl1NtlS ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 9 ~~ ~i6i~~i~il~ eases eases ~, c ~, ~~ J LL N GxZ_ J m U m Q ~J F ~< \ C C t : ° i~ ~§~ ~ $_ ee 0 s R J, tl `\J G i _ t _ t / j- ~_ jI r . • - n - t110ZOLK0 N1LW8fIS N~3lK7 NVl • !L df10!!fl NOi13d0 NOLSflNVI U30AN5 ~ O ~~~~TT r-~r7~,~~ r~~ (!i LOOLOEOOZ ~UUOW 35V~flNINNtlId 5110 ~/ lY ll .IQ~M -sl~',ii tllNllOdIlYJ Y9NO1W~fIJ ON'JNV!! 1 J 1. NLNd TdliilSflONI tllINtl tllMlS MrLa aar.~som.~mrsrt~a ili .e ~. .. .. s ....H~ a N~n`d `dllNtl _dl_[Vb' CO ~ ~ Hill i9 r' >~ i? ~i! ' ! ~'~ i i t i ii i i~~~ll~ ~~~ L ~ N b L ~,ii IL~ ~II~~~Il~ ii lip L~ a ~ n ~ ~ it Il h • i0~00 I Di01 e e ~'~ LEI ! ~~! ~ i o t 1 €~~i ijl E! i'~ y y L L II (I ~ ~~ai ~~~~ i+ tlli~ i~ I `~ II ! 9 i ~ ~~ °I i g .~ i! °t~~e ~~B 11 III ~ YI ~~3~~ III ~~~ Iii ~~~ L~li g~ ii:IlB:IE! dill` I 11 I~ ~~~ ~~ PE ~ !e ~~ ~~ ~ ~! ! {Y ~~ Il 6~ !I LI I ii I~ ~; I !~ 3 L.. .. .. x iiilii 5 ~' I! !' !I'ili~l`I'•I'I !l '~'' p~lj1S !l••I ~l••! ef6CE~~al Ftio ...,.,~~ ~~~ , n l~Ii~~~lll6illl~illl119l11!!I E v pF E, _ _ i U I ~ F T' 4 ~ ~~ N 'I N e~, _ t p~~ I L.'Y~ ___{ I __li 3 r ~~ ~~ B I i~ ~ Y; _.-__-_ 79NN7B0 >898J A7Q. __ 7091NOJ 00071 A.WI10~ ONI09YN999 NY9 __--___i-._-___~____-___.`___-___ __ti____i. N N b ~g -- a.. ~., ~~~i ~=-'. --- ~~--==1: A' a.~..`~^ t.._ + ~ ~ s, ~~ f~ ~! ~ _ F { 11 ' I~lv ~\ __ _ ~r_ I ~ _r ~ •I ~ _i I i I 9' ~ bi ;/ I I~ $ r~ , __-._ i. ~ ._ , ~;-i '-----'= ~, ;' t~ , " _ -_ ~~ _` ;:- ~o~ f 8x: 7, ~~~~ ~F~, .aap ;{'R~R ~ DpEy~ 9~;a 3¢ ~ g ~.~i~ • i TI A-A ~~--- SECTION -B SECTION C-C -m~r-.T DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS i 7.40 P.M Doug Fenn February 17, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16369-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 4.23 acres of land into six parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Amta Avenue -APN• 0229-321-10 Related File Development Review DRC2003-01007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop six industrial buildings totaling 84,494 square feet on 4.23 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Amta Avenue -APN. 0229-321-10 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Deswn Parameters The site is surrounded by mdustnal development to the north, south, and east A utility corridor containing power transmission lines, and the Day Creek flood control channel exists to the west Evidence of reoccurring disang for fire abatement purposes is ewdent The site presently drams from the northwest to the southwest, with an overall fall of 2 to 3 feet. The infill mdustnal development contains six small sized bwidings, which range in size from 9,526 square feet to 19,617 square feet The buldings are rectangular shaped, which is conducive for the intended use. Access into the protect site is via Santa Anita Avenue Additionally, the applicant has provided an outdoors employees' area for the protect. The protect also has an associated parcel map for each building and associated parking. The buildings have a 360-degree architectural theme that includes decorative details, recessed blue reflective glazing, and sandblasted concrete, with a multi color paint scheme. Over each primary entry way is a metal clad canopy with steel suspension rods Note All elevations of Bwldng 6 are drawn incorrectly and would actually be a reverse of that shown. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Architecture -Additional sandblasted concrete needs to be added higher up at all primary entryways, and should be added at secondary entrances The sandblasted concrete shown is limited to a band around the base of the buildings where it will be hidden by cars and landscaping ~( 2 Landscaping -Planters need to be added along the entire north, south, and west property lines The diamond-shaped tree wells do not meet Code standard for a continuous 5-foot perimeter landscaped step (RCMC 17 12 030.A 11 b and 17 30 040E 4.c) 3 In addition, one tree per each 3 parking stalls is required to shade parking spaces along the west side of Buildings 3 and 4 (RCMC17 12.030 A 11 a and 17 30 040E 4 a) Also, one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding face is requred along the north, south, and west sides of ~ Bwldings 3 and 4 (RCMC17 12 030 A 11 a and 17 30 040E 4 b) ~ F, ~~ 2~ DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRCSUBTPM16369 AND DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 17, 2004 Page 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 5 No exterior downspouts are to be visible on any of the bwldings. 6 Parapets are to be high enough so as to screen all roof-mounted egwpment 7. Transformers should be screened by shrubs. Policv Issues. The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be Incorporated into the protect design without discussion 3 Paint roll-up doors and service doors to match the building elevations Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the protect be revised and return as a Consent Calendar item Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Cristme McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong . Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant showed revised elevation to the Committee The changes to the design addressed the staff comments m the staff report 1 Provided additional sandblasting at entryways 2 Provided a 5-foot wide planter on perimeter property Imes and landscaping around buildings, which were m compliance with City regulations. 3 There will not be exterior down spouts, and the parapet walls will be high enough to screen all roof-mounted egwpment The Committee recommended approval of the protect • ~~~ ~\ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) CM orRandro Cucamonga (Please type or pdnt eleady using Ink Use the tab key ro move from one line ro the neat line) Planning Orvrsron (909) 477-2750 ~ The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuantto City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS bVILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the appl~cabon rs complete at the 6me of submittal, City staff will not be evadable to peAorm work requued to provide missing rnforma6on ~~ ~3 GYd07 Application Number for the pm/ect to which this form peRams ~U.~r~~~~~9 , Pro/ect Title Santa Anita Industnal Business Park Name & Address of pm/ect owner(s) Synder Langston Operon Group 4 Upper Newport Plaza, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone 949-833-5400 Tyler Stonebreaker/Donald Russell Fax 949-833-5401 Name & Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor Synder Langston Operon Group 4 Upper Newport Plaza, Swte 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tyler Stonebreaker/Donald Russell Phone 949-833-5400 Fax 949-833-5401 Contact Person & Address Chuck Buquet - Charles Joseph Associates, 16081 Foothill Blvd Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address of person prepanng this form (d ddferent from above) Chuck Buquet - Charles Joseph Assoaates, 16081 Foothill Blvd Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number 909-481-1822 ~ ~ ZZ EnvironmentallMoFormSy~'-- Page 1 Created on 101102003 12 03 PM ~~~~~~~ r-1 LJ Street Info abon mdreated by an astensk (') rs not requrrnd of non~onstruchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) rovrde a full scale (8-12 x 11 J copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the profed site, and indicate t e sde boundanes 2) rowde a set of color photographs that show representahve views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the pnmary access points that serve the site, and reprosentahve views of significant features from the sde Incude a map showing location of each photograph 3) Proled Locahon (descnbe) West side of Santa Anita, North of 4"' 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach add~honal sheet d necessary) -10-0000 'S) Net Srte Area (total Srte size minus area of public streets 8 proposed • dedreahons) 3 80 •5) Gmss Srte An;a (arJsq ft) 4 23 7) Descnbe any pmposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the protect site (attach add~honal sheet rtnecessary) None 8) Include a descnption of alt permits whrch wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes rn order to Tully implement fhe pro/ect Grading and Building Permits 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the Srte as it exists befog the protect including rnformatron on topography, sort stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trans and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on Srte (including age and condition) and the use of the structues Attach photographs of significant features descnbed In addrhon, cite all sources of rnformatron (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studres, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studres) West of the site is Flood Control with surrounding weeds and non esential shurbs Srte rs generally flat and slopes to south ~7 L~ EnvironmentallnfoFormSynder Page 2 Created on 10!10/2003 12 03 PM i • l_.J 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the sde Cde all sources of informahon (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known htstoncal aspects of thts site 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now aHed the sde (airoraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Interstate 15 freeway West of the site and should have mtnlmal Impact on an Industrial park protect • 12) Describe the proposed pro/ed m detail Thts should pmv~de an adequate descnphon of the site m terms of ultimate use that will rnsutt from the proposed pro/ed Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wrth each phase, and the anticipated completion oI each increment Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary Proposed development of 6 Industrial Park Office/Warehouse buildings to General Industrial Sub Area 14 of the CIry of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Buildings range from 9 526 square feet to 19 617 square feet Thls bulldtngs will be constructed In one phase on 4 23 acres on the west side of Santa Anita Street, North of 4"' Street • EnwronmentallnfoFonnSynder Page 3 ~ Created on 10/1012003 12 03 PM i ~J 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, hisfoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (rosidenhal, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) West Flood Control and Vacant land to the 15 freeway North - North proved Noodle Manufactunng Plant East -Industnal Park South -Industnal Park, current) under construction 14) Will the proposed pro)ed change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ The proposed protect is generally consistent with the existing and proposed Industnal development in the area 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term none to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-srte uses What methods of soundproofing are pmposed ~ Short term construction noise during protect construction phase Industrial park business operations will be consistent wdh applicable City noise standards _ '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic tines None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None ~~ ~. ~~ EnvironmentallntoFOrmSynder Page 4 Created on 10/10!2003 12 03 PM 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdentral (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b l;ommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ac) 6.345 00 Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) 12.960 00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^Sepbc Tank ®Sewer If Sepbc tanks are proposed, attach peroolahon tests If discharge to a sandery sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 e Resrdenhal (gal/day) b CommercraVlndustnal (gal/day/ac) 2 000 00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenbal unds N/A Detached (indicate range o/parcel sizes, mrnrmum lot Sze and maximum lot size i Attached (md~cate whetherunrts are rental or for sale unds) N/A 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specdy number o/bedrooms by and type 23) Indicate anhcrpated household size by and type N/A ~~~ 2la EnwronmentailnfoFOnnSynder Page ° Created on 101102003 12 03 PM • 24) Indreate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the protect Contact the appmpnate School Distnds as shown in Attachment B • a Elementary 0 b Junior Hrgh 0 c Senior Hrgh 0 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or lunchon(s) of commercal, mdustnal or msbtubonal uses , Master Plan Industnal uses with small office component for ancillary admtnstrative functions 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or institutional uses by type i 27) Indreate hours of operation TBD-Speculative Master Plan Industnal Park Protect 28) Numbero/employees Maximum Shift • 29) Pmwde breakdown of anticipated fob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) TBD Master Plan speculative mdustnal Park Protect 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the TBD City '31) For commercial and Industnal uses only, Indreate the source, type and amount of airpollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast AIr Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) Total Time of Maximum Shftt Faculty operations will be consistent with all applicable standards Environments II ntoFormSynder Page 6 Created on 101102003 12 03 PM i ALL PROJECTS C~ 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to detertnrne their abrl~ty to prowde adequate service to the proposed pro/ed~ If so, please indicate their response All agencies contacted have Indicated their ability to prowde adequate service to the protect site 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o(any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known No 34) Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, rnclud~ng but not limited to those examples I~sted above If yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans None are proposed for this protect I hereby ceRdy that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and rnfomtat~on required for adequate evaluation o/[his pro/ect to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and infonnabon presented are true and coned tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date 10/13/03 Signature Title Chuck euquet Charles Joseph Associates • EnvvonmentallntoFormSynder Page 7 ~t I~ ~~ Created on 10/10/2003 12 03 PM ' -___ --1 .n~_. I r - -- -' -• --- - I _ _ ._ , I -, ~ I I 3i - I_ ~ - c~ ~_ >„ _ - I- - ~~. - -~ _ - - ~ I -_ ~ . ^ ~ 1 -_ ~ _-- _'~~lr- -- dl awry `E-- ---- ~-~ ~ - = ~ ~ roaena I a-N°_ _--~-- - --~ - 11--~~ -l_ _ $7 RM I1PCtPT 1 - Pew • ~ ~ - _ ' / .-~i - -~~ r. - i ~ „~~~ Santa Anita/ndustria/Park Site --~ ~ I I is ,rte s ~ ~ _ ~ - I t ~•. _ I .l - .I _ _-_- _ -- ~ _ ~1 --' q I ' " ~I ~ ,,I,,.r , - - -- -- _- --,_z~, n~E I\\Uln _ _-_ __- ___--_ -=p</'rEa~~..nl)irv~L Z ~ %: ~rT~r PIO M(li(1P SP~EDWF~ ~ - I :_ - ~ - ~ FPEEIM1'A. ~~ CA -'I -' -- 1 ~ I _ _ `C ,i``~` _ _ ,,~ _~ \~ ____ ___ -- I_,_ I _- I I _ - - LI - _ I `I • I / u I /~ ~ I ~~ I ~,~ Syndery Langston Project Site Photos 1. View of NWC of project site on Santa Anita facing west; south of Nong Shim. i 2. View from NWC of project site facing south along Santa Anita Site Photographs Exhibit Provided bv: • Langston Properties Charlesioseph Associates Pagel ~\>~ ~~ Synder Langston Project Site Photos 3. View from SEC of project site facing east toward Santa Anita. 4. View from SEC of project site facing north along Santa Anitia to- ward future 6th street. i Site Photooraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Langston Properties Charlesioseph Associates J plRI1C/PGIVAIE $K10P MANAGEMEM ffRJICES Paget Synder Langston Project Site Photos 5. View from NWC of project site facing south down toward Existing Santa Anita ave. 6. View from SWC of project site facing west toward Santa Anita. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Langston Properties ~2 Charlesioseph Associates J PU&1CIRiNAfE SEC10R AMNIIGEMEM SERJICES Page3 Synder Langston Project Site Photos 7. View from SEC of project site facing south down toward Existing Santa Anita ave development and street improvements. 8. View from SEC of project site facing west toward Flood Control Channel. Site Photoaraohs Exhibit Provided bv: Langston Properties ', Charles Joseph Associates ~~ J HRUC/PRIVAiE SK10H MANAGEMF}ff fffMCES BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 and Development Review DRC2003-01007 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 4 23 acres of land into six parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue -APN 0229-321-10 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop 6 industrial buildings totaling 84,494 square feet on 4 23 acres of land rn the General Industnal District (Subarea 14), located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue -APN 0229-321-10 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industnal (Subarea 2) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is surrounded by industrial development to the north, south, containing power transmission lines and the Day Creek flood control Evidence of reoccurring disking for fire abatement purposes is evident from the northwest to the southwest, with an overall fall of 2 to 3 feet 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 and east A utility corridor channel exists to the west The site presently drains 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None ~~ F, 1~ J~ Irntial Study for DRC2003-01007 AND SUBTPM16369 GLOSSARY -The following abbrev~at,ons are used m this report: EIR - Envvonmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o-Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ~l Inltlal Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01007 AND SUBTPM16369 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or "Less Than Sigmficant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology/Soils ()Hazards & Hazardous (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Land Use/Planning Materials ()Energy and Mineral Resources ~ () populationMousing ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Transportation/Traffic ()Public Services ()Recreation DETERMINATION On the bans of this initial evaluation i find that the proposed prolect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions m the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () 1 find that the proposed prolect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed prolect MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects t) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions mitigation measures that are~nposed upon the proposed prolect, nothing further is requred Prepared By Reviewed By Date Date or Z 60 ~t~ ~0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 4 Less man S,p,ahcenf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotemiauy sioniucent wnn MNpaaon rnan SianNCant No I Into refeC 1 acl I act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and ds surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area ~~ Comments: I a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a wew corridor according to General Plan Exhibrt III-15 i b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State scenic highway Then=. are no State scemc highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The sde is located west of Santa Anita Avenue and generally north of 4th Street The site is bordered on the north by vacant land and industrial buildings across Santa Anita to the east To the south is an industrial building, and to the west is the Day Creek Channel of the San Bernardino Flood Control District Landscaping would be in accordance with approved plans and would buffer site activity The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans, which regwre review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine illuminated areas within the prolect site The impact is not considered signihcant AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract F, ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 5 Less marl Significant Legs Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pete^ually SiO~lzent wpm Miopefion man Siglaficant No I d Into tail I C I eel c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses , Comments: a) The site is not designated as prime farmlands, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance The site is located west of Santa Anita Avenue and generally north of 4th Street The sde is bordered on the north by vacant land and industrial buildings across Santa Anita to the east To the south is an industrial building, and to the west is the Day Creek Channel of the San Bernardrno Flood Control District There are approximately 1,300 acres of prime farmlands, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according, to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubttul, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located west of Santa Anita Avenue and generally north of 4th Street The site is bordered on the north by vacant land and industrial buildings across Santa Anita to the east To the south is an industrial building, and to the west is the Day Creek Channel of the San Bernardino Flood Control District The nearest agricultural use is approximately 5 mile to north of the prolect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the prolect () () () (~) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air qualty plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (~) O ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of O O O (~) any criteria pollutant for which the prolect region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () ( ) (~) concentrations F, h ~_~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 6 Lass Than &qru~cant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Potenaaliy S,grchcant wnn Miageson Tnan Sigmacant Nc I ^ Incro teD I cl e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (~) number of peoples ' Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 56), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction 4s an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Clty verification. 2. Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4 All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. J 5. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• ~, h Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 7 Lees Then Spruficent Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa~amielly $iprufirant wnn MNpebon Then S,pnifitant NO I ecl Inco tee I ecy I • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City If silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result o1 hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW~CB) dally to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAaMD Rule 403. 7. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water Ouallty Control Board [RW~CB]) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 8. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible 9. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the proceeding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates In Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,o would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant ~~~ to i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 8 Less Than $igndicam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signtliwnt With Mitigation Tasn $ignilmant No 1 an Inco rated I act act The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11. All industrial and commercial facilfties shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules m conspicuous areas. 13 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After Implementation of the proceeding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the atywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council ~ • c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywade increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitve receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create sigmficant impacts if they are located within f/a-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is not located within '/a-mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site e) The proposed protect would include the construction of seven industrial bwldings End use of the protect would include warehouse and manufacturing and would not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anUCipated • F, ~ ~1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 9 Less me„ Spnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially SiBnihcant Weft Miogaeon Then SiBnMCant No 1 act Inco ratetl I act I as 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () ~) (~) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a'substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () (~) ( ) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () (~) ( ) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (~) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan Comments. a) The prolect site is located in area developed with industrial, manufacturing and warehouse uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual disking for weed abatement purposes According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc prepared a Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) habitat survey on October 15, 2001, and October 17, 2002 Both analyses's found that no DSF were observed on or near the site during a survey on field investigations This reports concluded that the site had low potential to support DSF based on existing vegetation, past site disturbance, and lack of DSF in the immediate vicinity F~~~ y2. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 10 Lass Than Si9rvhcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fotan,iallr Siprvlicam wan MNpaeon Than Spnifwant No I acf Inco ra18E I atl I aq b) The prolect site Is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat Is present on-site As a result, prolect Implementation would have no Impact on these resources ,~ d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or Is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees or mature trees on the prolect site, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any Iocai ordinance f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. u 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance () () () ,(/) of a historical resource as defined In § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (~) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (~) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologicfeature~ d) Disturb any human remains, Including those Interred () () () (~) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The prolect site has not been Identified as a °Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area Is known to have been Inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soli excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be Implemented If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. f , \\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 11 Less Then S,prvfitani Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 PWant,elly $,prvhtam WM M,epepon Than Sipruficent No ~ an Into tail I atl ~ eh • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information ' Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary penod, when the last °Ice Age" and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (r.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be Ilm~ted to, the following measures• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere salvage. If construction personnel contractor should immediately divert of the find. until the monitor has completed make the discovery, the grading construction and notify the monitor • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by reoccurring disking for weed abatement purposes • ~, ~ ~~ C Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 12 Lass roan Sigrcficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrvhcant won Mingeoon ~,» ^.>IprvfiCent iNo I h Inco tad I I q No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No adverse impacts are anticipated C J 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the prolect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O I(/) ui) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) Ilquefaction~ ro) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoll~ () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that Is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result In on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have sails incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it Is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor Is d in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fautt, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red HIII Fault, Is located approximately 3 5 mile northeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone Iles approximately 7 25 miles northwest of the protect site These faults are both capable of producing M„ 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately eight miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, Is approximately 16 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwiding Code well ensure that geologic Impacts are less-than-signdicant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates airborne sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the Impacts of windblown sand, resulting In temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the r, ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 13 ~~ S,gmficant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Siprcfitant WM Mitigebon TTen Siprstitem No I d Irwo tad I bn I General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand Impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce Impacts to less-than-significant levels 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 2. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Fine Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Delhi Flne Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These sods are typically level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans, excessively drained, reworked by wind action, and can support proposed development New structures are required to meet current earthquake standards as required by the Uniform Building Code No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the O O U (~) envvonment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () ( ) () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () ( ) () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school F,1~ y~ • • J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 14 Less Tften $IQNIICOM LESS Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PManually sioNUCam wnn ALOpaaon rnan siomecam NO I act IMO tetl I act I eM d) Be located on a site which is included on a hst of O O O (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () ( ) () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () ( ) () (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () ( ) () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency ~ evacuation plans h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () ( ) () ~(/) intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any others in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, since the property is surrounded by similar industrial uses no adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any others in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, since the property is surrounded by similar industrial uses no adverse impacts are anticipated c) There no schools located within a'/<-mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 3 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, since the property is surrounded by similar industrial uses no impacts are anticipated I t F~ -\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Rewew DRC2003-01007 and Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 15 Less Than Syaecent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g °~BO081r Sipm6cant w,m 64upabM man $ipruficant No I a<t Incn tad ~ i act d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 9/a-mile of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 2 Ya miles northwesterly of the Ontario Avport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, located in the City of Upland, is located approximately 6 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildiand Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fue hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runofi~ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quahty~ O O O (/) ~ h -\~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 16 Less Than Siprvhtant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Polenuany Siprvhcant wpm A4hpahon man Siprvhcant No Inpect Into reteE ~ ect d g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) mtury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflowv O O O (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer seance is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems ~ b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect wtll not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCW D has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or nver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant 1..J d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or nver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in tlooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated \~ `'~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 17 ~ mom, son~~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,q ~;,; µ w,~, s,~„~,,, r~ i ~., ~ ~ i i e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the sde will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are antx:ipated f) Grading activdies associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, the site is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize ,water pollution A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMD) was prepared by Operon Group and concluded that the mitigation measure shall be implemented according to their study at plan check The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 2. Post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) as outlined as Non- structural BPMs and Routine Structural BMPs; shall be Implemented as described on 2.1 and 2.2 lists detailed m the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines /or New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 4. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~~\\ C_ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 18 Lass man Sproficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially $iprvfitRnt wnn MiagaaM maa $ipevfirant No I en Into tea ~ a t) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anbcipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance with Crty This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the Cdy, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City i \_J 9. LMDl1SEANDPLANNING. Would thepro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with tunsdiction over the protect ' (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effects ~ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plans ~ Comments: a) The site is located west of Santa Anita Avenue and generally north of 4th Street The site is bordered on the north by vacant land and industrial bwldings across Santa Anita to the east To the south is an industrial budding and to the west is the Day Creek Channel of the San Bernardino Flood Control District The proposed industrial bwlding would blend with existing surroundings This protect wdl be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial uses in the immediate area, and will become a part of the larger community of industrial uses in the surrounding area No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is General Industrial The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is located within the Ontario Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF) established by the U S Fish and Wildlife Service According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development may adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and ~s consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan DSF STUDY NEEDED 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would fhe protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plans 1 ~~~ ~\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPMi 6369 Page 19 Lass 71ian Sipruficant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Potamially S,c~hwm WM auapaam Than awficam No ~ Inco ted I n ~ Comments. a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact ' b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-2 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () (/) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenc+es~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () () () (/) noise levels in the protect vanity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adapted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels For a protect within the windy of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding Cdy standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out Normal construction techniques for concrete tilt-up buildings will provide sound attenuation The protect is located within an industrial area, hence, there are no sensitive receptors nearby that could be impacted The City's Development Code requres that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed bwldmg, hence, no adverse operational impact to the proposed use or employees is expected b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed bwlding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby industrial uses ~s expected c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect i • d) See a) response above C 1 t~ ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 20 Less men Sipmhcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g a^temiallr Sigmhcent wen MNgahon men SiOrnfitant No I cl Inco tetl I act act e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 4 miles of a public alrport Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 6 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated I1 LJ 12. POPULATIONANDHOl1SQJC: Would the protect. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere I c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere I I Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed industrial area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated wdh the provision of new or physrcally altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered govemmental facilities, fhe construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obfect~ves for any of the public services O O O (/) a) Fire protecbon~ b) Police protectioM O O U (/) c) Schools O O O (/) d) Parks U O O (/) e) Otherpubhcfacddies~ O O O (/) ~t `` S~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 21 Less Than Sigmfioant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g I=otantlally Spnificant wnn Mitlpatlon Than Sipnificent No 1 act Inco ratetl I act I ect Comments: a) The site is located west of Santa Anita Avenue and generally north of 4th Street The site would be served by a fire station, located approximately 3 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by state law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed industrial area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 3 miles from the protect site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a • decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the • environment ~,~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 22 Less man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially sgnmcant wnn Mrtigabon men Sipnificent No I cl Inco etl I act act Comments: a) The site is in a developed industrial area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard cpndition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e., result in a substantial increase in erther the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersectwns)~ i b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () (/) I( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways ! c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capaaty~ O U O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated . b) The protect will generate 232 two-way peak hour trips which is less than the 250 two-way t Pl M an anagemen peak hour trips for non-retail threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The proposed protect consists of 6 industrial buildings totaling "84,486 square feet A peak hour trip generation analysis was F, `~ ~S Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 23 ~~ rn~ Siprvfeem Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polemia~ly Siprutlcent wen Minpetlon rnen Siyehcent No I eh Irxn rated I I C prepared by a registered Traffic Engineer using trip generation data based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 6th Edition, to determine the a m and p m two-way peak hour taps Based upon the square footages, layout of the buildings (dock high doors, grade level doors, etc) and historical land use practice of industrial uses, the 7 buildings were divided into 3 land use categories for the trip generation analysis. industrial park, manufacturing, and warehouse The results of the a m./p m peak hour trip generation analysis have been reviewed and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Traffic Engineer Since the proposed 84,486 square foot total industrial protect is forecasted to generate less than 250 two-way a m peak hour trips (220 two-way trips in the a m peak hour) and less than 250 two-way p m peak hour trips (232 two-way trips in the p.m peak hour), preparation of a CMPlTIA is not required for the proposed protect according to CMP/TIA guidelines The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials. The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated ,4 c) Located approximately 4 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an industrial area that is mostly developed The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or fanning uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ \ ~` 1~ J • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 24 ~aa man $ipnificant leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potamially $iprvfirant wro~ M,bgebon maa $,grvficam No I act Into retail I ect d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () ( ) () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or,are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () ( ) () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity () ( ) () (/) to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () ( ) () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment iplant located within Rancho Cucamonga The prolect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The prolect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The CCW D provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent i Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use prolect including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and, B) any protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when 1) a protect that F,~ ~~- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 25 Less Than Sipnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Fotanaally Significant WM A4agatlon Than Significant No I acl 1 etl I I acl is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and 3) applies to development agreements that include such subdivision The City is required to determine if a protect is subtect to the requirements listed above If the City determines that a protect meets one of the regwrements, then a request for a protect specific Water Supply Assessment must be submitted to the CCWD The CCWD has 90 days to prepare a detailed Water Supply Assessment for the protect The Assessment requires CCW D Board of Directors approval The proposed protect would include the construction/operation of 6 industrial buildings totaling 84,486 square feet Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221 and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CCWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilRies. Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) ~/) ~/) i ~. 1~ .~C% Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 26 Less Then SiONfieent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~„fi°~;,; e, ~b~, s,~ ~,„ re ~ ~~ iea i n c) Does the protect have environmental effects which wdl O O O (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either duectly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, d ~s unlikely that any endangered or rare speaes would inhabit the site Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc prepared a DSF habitat survey on October 15, 2001, and October 17, 2002. Both analyses found that no DSF were observed on or near the site during a survey on field investigations This reports concluded that the site had low potential to support DSF based on existing vegetation, past site disturbance, and lack of DSF m the immediate vicinity b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance wdh the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effectts of bwld-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of she General Plan would result in signficant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, au quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mtigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the signrficant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelmes Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefts include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ether directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels ~t~ ~ \ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2003-01007 and Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 Page 27 . EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identrfied above for this protect were wRhin the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mdigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Indial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certfied October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment far the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Spec'rf~c Plan EIR (Certfied September 19, 1981) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certrfy that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Indial Study and the proposed mdigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mdigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature w ~r Date ~ ~' Print Name and Tdle ~ ~ T ~ua(uC ~ - ~~~ r1 L_ J ~\ u City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092,of the Public Resources Code. Protect File No.• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 and Development Review DRC2003-01007 Public Review Period Closes• April 14, 2004 Prolect Name. Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Assoaates Project Location (also see attached map). Located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue - APN 0229-321-10 Project Description: Subdivision of 4 23 acres of land into 6 parcels for the development of 6 industrial bwldings totaling 81,812 square feet in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) FINDING ' This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following findmg• ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. April 14 2004 . Date of Determination By ~~~ ( RESOLUTION NO 04-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL GENERAL NDIUSTRIAL D STRICTO(SUBAREA 14)E NTOO 6 PARCELS, LOCATED AT 9300 SANTA ANITA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-321-10 A Rectals 1 Charles Joseph Assouates filed an application forthe approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369, as descnbed rn the title of this Resolution Hereinafter rn this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request rs refen•ed to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded sard heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth rn the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 14, 2004, rnGudmg wntten and oral staff reports, together ~nnth public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to vacant property located at 9300 Santa Ands Avenue, and b The application proposes the subdivision of 4 23 acres into 6 parcels, and c The application, in contunction v~nth Development Review DRC2003-01007, proposes the construction of six industnal buildings ranging in size from 9,526 square feet to 19,617 square feet, and d The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and ~` ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 2 c The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and d The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and e The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict wth any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together vnth all wnrien and oral reports inGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect MolnitonngsProgramtattached heretoeand ncorporateddherein bytthaisereferentceeb seldupon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaretion has been prepared incompliance with the promulgiatednthereunderl thataea d Mitigated NegativemDeclarat ondandetheten teal Sd y prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further„ this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant reduced to anlacceptablealevell bysmlpos t on oromi g lion measures on9he protect, which are I sled below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project vnll have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resoumzs orthe habtat upon Negative) Declarat on, the st ff reports and exhibitsuand thelinforna on provided to the Pltanning adverse eiffect as sethforth mi Section 753.5(ca1 d) of ~t a 1i4 oif the Cahfomba Code of ReguPat~onsf 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, ahnd m the StandardrCondt ornseariached Iherteto andtmcotrpoaated heeefn by thstreferetncehbe)ow Enaineenna Division 1) Santa Anita Avenue shall be improved in ane ad scent s dewalk, "Industnal Local" standards, including property 1 streetlights, street trees, dnve approach, traffic signs, and stnping a) Protect existing curb and gutter, or repay as required Extend the curb and gutter northerly, if necessary t i~ ~l:_J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 2) Revise City Dramnng No 315 to reflect the above public improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, pnor to budding pernit issuance 3) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle Q,oo 4) Provide a secondary overflow drainage system in the event of blockage in the sump catch basins to avoid flooding in the buildings 5) of thee CityaEng neet~ anda9dentify applicable PBestt Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 6) Control Distnct approvedebamter shall behconstructed along the Flood Control Distnct's nght-of-way adjacent to the site 7) The final Parcel Map 16369 shall be approved and recorded, pnor to issuance of budding permits Environmental Mibflation • Arr Quality 1) s dThe contractorshalgl a e t A ll ssion em so as to reduce operationa nd on c ,o uipment rs bung properly serviced and on e t t q i ruc ensure that all cons maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Gty venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd nd l e a construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedu Construction contractors shall provide protected equipment use evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment moll be was investigated and found to be infeasible for utilized, or that their use the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction ct measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distra (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards d l ie noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be app either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) nsnd 0 D m s i c io g prov s nclude the fol ow hall nallyQco tractors Addit o 403 I t~ "~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 4 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated`matenal inaccordance vwth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high Nnnds (i e , Hnnd speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance month Rule 403 requvements • Maintain a mirnmum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated ~nnth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemaUve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans inGude a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial faGlit~es shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industnal and commeroial faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible • ~t~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION f2ESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 5 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc arohaeologia3l resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistana3 of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cua3monga wall Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sties from demolition or significant modifia3tion wnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its arohaeologia3l value ' Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of arohaeologia3l sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue edua3ting the public about the area's arohaeological ' hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report wrath onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudion field survey of the proled site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the follownng measures Assign a paleontolog~aal momtor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils wrath minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the momtor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the momtor of the find Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cua3monga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum Geology and Sods • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 F, ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Gty to reduce PM,o emissions associated meth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when mend speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactwe construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-sde shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and becks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) as outlined as Non-structural BMPs and Routine Structural BMPs shall be implemented as described on 2 1 and 2.2 lists detailed in the Water • Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3) Pnor to issuance of building pemvts, the applicant shall submit to the Gty Engineer for approval of a WQMP, inGuding a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the stone dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gurdel~nes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 4) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply moth obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-41 SUBTPM16369 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 7 BY Richard Macias, Cha~rtnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plannng Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannng Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the following vote-to-Hnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS `J F,~~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Rewew DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect i 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 r 1`~ ~` 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-00239 and SUBTPM16167 • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined bythe protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation actvities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may apse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9 In those instances requmng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~t MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01007 and SUBTPMi6369 Applicant: Charles Josea h Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn Date: November 12. 2003 i -. - .. Air Quality '`, `~.° `> ~ ~.~~, i s ~ 1~ n ~ j °,y~t~~C~y`~{1~ j `; x}~ '_ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 r if -v Lit n ' -:+"~~tY ~ {3i Y ~' i ~F /i . ~3~ ~~'FY/'p Q` ~ fnS Y..'&Pi~ o~~ All construction egwpment shall be maintained m good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction _ egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficaUon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied ether by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 - All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throu h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 i~fi • ~~ N • • .. ... -. ~. .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineerin ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Dunng A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high words (i e , gO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 re wrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods gO/CE C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C Dunng A/C 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Rewew of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) _ _ All ndusinal and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools 2of6 .. • ... -. ~. . .. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be requved to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible - - Cultural Resources ~ ` " ~~ ~ y, -,~~'~ ~. ~. axr :' ' ~ ~, If any prehistoric archaeological resources are - encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant moddication Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report ~ developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint Pursue educating the public about the area's • CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin T L 3~6 .. .. . -. .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide speatic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological montor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth•disturbin activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notii the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods - " ` ~ ,; . °= ~ ~ " The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A - 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, ~n accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 - Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil oif- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes 4 of 6 "r .. . - -. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construcbon Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and WaterQuahty - _ „ . """. t;..~<-~~.'~~ =~?~°~,,:~ ~ -.., w Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelmes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) CE B/C/D Revew of Plans 2/4 ' as outlined as Non-structural BMPs and Routine A/C Structural BMPs shall be implemented as described on 21 and 22 lists detailed in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ~ 5~ ~ • ~ ! Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res Onslble Person - ~ P e. '~ ~ """' ""°- *x= s,Rr~' -Mbnliodng,~C~i9de~ay~~+";,~~~,,xs~ ~ E«°« ~ s ~ e' Meffio~of~Varifl~6t~~~,~ ~' `~„a, ..~ ti e ~ - yra,=• r ~5an~tir~`n8~~r,*:~;~~t:,,.,,°"' ,`a~ ~z ex ~ CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - W dhhold Recordation of Fnal Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwiding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Offwial or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 • Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation ~_~ 6 of 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM16369 , SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: 9300 SANTA ANITA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftemative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first SC-1-04 ~ ~`~ Completion Date ~~- ~ ~ / / / / Protect No SUBTPM76369 Comoletion Date 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable Cary Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit Issuance 5 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to , the issuance of building permits D. Environmental ' 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~_ implementing said measures, Including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Clty Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for CIry staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fortelt E. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall prowde a solid overhead structure for i mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the - overhead structure shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of i building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR • COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point ~_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the ffnai parcel map 2 All existing easements lying within f uture nghts-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/ final map G. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to Ctty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source _/~_ of energy, fuel or power to any bulding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Cary Council, except that in developments containing more than one bulding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buldings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • SC-1-04 ~t,/ (~(~ 2 `tom j~J Protect No SUBTPM16369 Comolehon Date Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall tie submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney gyaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gurier AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights SVeet Trees Comm Treil Median Island Bike Trail Other Santa Anita Avenue X X X X X 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15•gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program / / ~~- ~~. ~~ ~~- ~- ~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-1-04 3 ~~ V Protect No SUBTPM16369 Completion Date Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Ciry Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Oty Santa Anita Avenue P A less than 8 feet Brachychaon populneus Bottle Tree 5 tt 25 tt o c 15-gal P A greeter than 8 Platanus ecenfol~a London Plane Tree 8 tt 30 tt o c 15-gal feet or background Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clry standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clry inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill Boll amendments, as determined by the Clry Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required H. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Ciry Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer J. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Clry Engineer. 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adjacent areas 3 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Is required for work within its right-of-way Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Ciry will be required for Santa Anita Avenue / / i _~-~- -~_ . -~-~ ~~ SC-1-04 4 ~t\~ Protect No SUBTPM16369 Completion Date .K. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County W ater District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects ' 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the fihal parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them L. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Dmsion when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project ~-/- _/~- / / ~-~. ~~- _/~- 5~-,-04 5 F,\~ ~\ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT • STANDARD CONDITIONS December 30, 2003 Charles Joseph and Associates Santa Anita Industrial complex W/S of Santa Anita N/O 6`" st. DRC2003-1007 & SUBTPM76369 Buildings #3 & #4 must be built in accordance to the approved alternative method #05722. A fire flow letter from CCWD is required prior to permit issuance. FSG1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply General Guidance for Fire Hydrants The following provides general gwdance for the spacing aria iocanon o fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants ' a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commerciaVindustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fue hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft e Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a protect from the existing public roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersecticns 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As requved by the Fire Safety Droision to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40' from any building . 2 Mm~mum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers. The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect is 37 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 oercent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station ~\ ~ ~ ~ Page 1 of 8 monitoring This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District rewew and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Requved Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet b All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (See Fire Access) c When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate flow or pressure 2 Access Mitigation. Any structure or bwlding that does not meet minimum Fire District access requirements shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access. All portions of the structure or faal~ty or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle axess, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes• The minimum specifications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside firm radws shall not be larger than 24-feet c The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent ~`~ ~`~ Page 2 of 8 h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Doorways: In addition to any exterior opening requred by the Bwlding or Fue Code, approved doorways, axessible wthout the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways or walkwa s 5 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings 6 Gates Standards: All gates shall be installed in aocordance with Fire District Standards The following general design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must fully open with one second for each one foot of regwred width, e g , 20-ft /20 sec c When fully open the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates on access roads designated "Emergency Services Use Only" may be manually opening e Gates on Commercial/Industrial facilities may be manually operated f After protect approval the applicant shall contact the Fire Safety Division for complete standard 7 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 6 Fire lane Ident'rfication: All requred fire lanes shall be identrfied by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard FSGS Fire Alarm System 1 Required Installation: An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system ~s regwred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard Refer to Ordinance 15 and/or the Calrfomia Fire Cade for specrfic regwrements FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit regwrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or budding construction As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fve Safety Division for specific information Note: Carefully review the Items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed protect. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 Operate a repair garage (Motor Vehicle H-4) 4 Flammable finishes ~ Page 3 of 8 5 Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanks, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating, and organic peroxides and dual component coatings (per booth fee) 6 Operate a mechanical refrigeration system (over 200-pounds of refrigerant) 7 Operate dust-producing processes and operations 8 Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, andlor use) Storage of flammable and combustible liquids in outside aboveground storage tanks is prohibited by Rancho Cucamonga Fire Code 9 High piled combustible storage 10 Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capacity) On a scaled site plan show the occupancy or use of all buildings within a 'Fz mile radius. Storage exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capacity is not permitted within lz mile of residential areas 11 Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) 12 Compressed natural gas Bulk storage is not permitted within a ~ mile radius of any residential area Bulk storage in non-residential areas shall not exceed 183,000 aggregate capacity Contact Fire Safety Diwsion for add~honal information 13 Battery system - To install or operate lead-acid batteries over 100-gallon capacity 14 Cryogenics Flammable cryogenics are not permitted to be stored, dispensed, or used Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion for additional information 15 Dry cleaning plant 16 Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation 17 Tire storage -Open area used to store more than 1,000 cubic feet of tires 18 Wood products -Store more than 200 cubic feet of chips, lumber, plywood, or hogged material FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for complia nce with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dwision at (909) 387-8412 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions• If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required rf regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dwision at (909) 386-8412 for forms and assistance 2 Rental or Lease Properties: Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after recemng a request from the owner ~`~ ~~ Page 4 of 8 FSG12 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safet)<Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards FSG14 ARemate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Attemate Method" form along with supporting documents ' PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1. Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fve District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Dewces The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption egwpment for the surrounding controlled intersections 2 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire District access a Requves passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provde a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that'no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan required below The agreement shall be recorded~with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fve Safety Division prior to recordation To assist the Fire Safety Division in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of ail property included in the agreement b Legal Description. A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of Private Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn ratio, load-bearing capacity of roadway surtace, etc shall be provided 3 Recprocel Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and bwlt-in fire protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior to recordation \`\ ~ Page 5 of 8 • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Pnvatel0n-site Frre Hydrants: Pnor to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards Contac the Fue Safety Division for a copy of "Fue District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc.) A representative of Fue Construction Services shall inspect the instailat~on and witness hydrant flushing. The bwlder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Pnor to issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fue hydrants for the revew and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water Distract On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect, 4 Public Installation: All required public fue hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delroering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water Distract inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion Contact Water District to schedule testing 5 Building Use Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submd a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for revew and approval A form that • may be used to meet this regwrement is attached at the end of the Fire District comments Provide a separate letter for each bulding or structure wdh storage use areas 6 Combustible Construction Letter- Required Letter: Pnor to the issuance of a building permd for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submd a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fue hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance• For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fue hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Construction Services 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the regwred automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fue sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services 4 Sprinkler Monitoring The fue sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fue sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupanaes 5 Fire Suppression System. Plans and specifications for the fue suppression system for the protection of commeraal-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fue Construction Services permit 6 Fire Alarm System• Plans for the fue alarm system shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fue District permit ~ ~ ~~ Page 6 of 8 7 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted poor to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 8 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in vii hand 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance wdh Fue District Standards Contact the Fue Construction Services (90~) 477-2713 9 Site Directory: A building or site directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The site directory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fve Safety Division Standards b Standard Directory in budding lobby 10 Ftre Lanes: Poor to the issuance of any Certficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance wdh the approved fve lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fue lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of atl required fire lanes Contact Butlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 11 Address- Other Than Single-family: New bwldings other than single-faintly dwellings shall post the address wdh minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwldmg setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an adddional non-tlluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance ~ 12 Mufti-unit Complexes: In multi-und complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwiding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, suites, or bwldings The Fire Distnct~shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination wdh the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services 14 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Poor to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services 15 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is requred to obtain a Fire District Permit for Storage of High-ptle Combustible material 16 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans: The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fire Construction Services The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fire Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classification for the building is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limited to light hazard classrfication only 17 Hazardous or Flammable Ltquid Storage Tanks- County Review: The plans for flammable or hazardous liquid storage tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials DivisionlTank Program Contact County Fire Dept at (909) 386-8407 18 Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- Fire District Review: The plans for hazardous or flammable Iigwd storage tanks shall also be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division Contact RC Fire Dept at (909) 477-2770 19 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan• The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 386-8412 20 Submittal to the Fire District: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fire Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs '~~ ~ ~ Page 7 of 8 • • \_J 21 Required County Permits. The applicant shall be regwred to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permd, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division/Field Services Section at (909) 384-8407 22 Fire Distract Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Forn and submit to the Fire Safety Diwsion This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subfect building or property ~~~ ll~ Page 8 of 8 RESOLUTION NO 04-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01007 TO CONSTRUCT 6 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, TOTALING 81,812 ON 4 23 ACRES OF LAND OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED AT 9300 SANTAANITA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0229- 321-10 A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph AssoGates filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2004-01007, for the development of 6 industnal buildings totaling 81,812 square feet on 4.23 acres of land Hnthin the General Industnal Distnct 2 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, d is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth ~n the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on Apnl 14, 2004, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speufically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 9300 Santa Anita Avenue, and b The application contemplates the construction of 6 mdustnal warehouse buildings totaling 81,812 square feet, and c The proposed protect, together Huth the conditions applicable thereto, well not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally mlunous to properties or improvements ~n the vianity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent Huth the General Plan, and b The design or improvements of the proposed protect is consistent with the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and F~~ °14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 . d The design of the protect is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable m~ury to humans and Hnldlife or their habitat, and e The proposed protect is not likely to cause senous public health problems 4 Based upon the facts and information contamed in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect well have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaretion and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decarebon has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plannng Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the mfornation contamed m said Mitigated Negative Declaret~on Nnth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that v~ll result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plannng Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect vvill have potential for an adverse impact upon vvildlife resouroes orthe hablat upon which Hnldlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contamed m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planrnng Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Secbon 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the appliaat~on subtect to each and every condl~on set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannma Division 1) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as viewed from adtacent properties and street 2) No chain Imk Penang is permitted Chain Imk fence shown on plans along the west property line wll be replaced v~nth the same type of wrought iron plaster fence that is depicted along the south property Ime 3) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for outdoor employee eating areas 4) Truck parking spaces shall be a minimum of 14 feet vhde by 50 feet deep F~~ °I\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 3 Enoineenng Division 1) Santa Anita Avenue shall be improved in accordance with City "Industnal Local" standards, including property line adjacent sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, dnve approach, traffic signs, and stnping. a) Protect existing curb and gutter, or repair as required Extend the curb and gutter northerly, if necessary 2) Revise City Drawing No 315 to reflect the above public improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, pnor to building permit issuance 3) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle Quo 4) Provide a secondary overflow drainage system in the event of blockage in the sump catch basins to avoid flooding in the buildings 5) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 6) A 6-foot block walUchain link fence or other Flood Control Distnct approved bamer shall be constructed along the Flood Control Distnct's nght-of--way adjacent to the site 7) The final Parcel Map 16369 shall be approved and recorded, pnor to issuance of budding permits Environmental Mdisaation Air Qua/ily 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnorto the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submd construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff . 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray ~~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 4 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply vnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Adddronally, contractors shall mGude the follomnng provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction srte'through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed ' excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high moods (i e , mood speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Mamtam a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated ninth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance moth SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain mactwe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use 10) All mdustnal and commercal fatalities shall post signs regwnng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All mdustnal and commercal facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be requved to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules m conspicuous areas • i ~t~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 • Page 5 13) All industnal and commercial site tenants Huth 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cukun3l Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Hell retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actrv~ties, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Hell Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Gty to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follownng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources Hnthin the project area Submit one copy of the completed report Huth onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that vwll also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the follownng measures Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils wrath minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval ofearth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found Hnthin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speGmens wrath a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum ~t h v \~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 6 . Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated wrath water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Gty to reduce PM,o emissions assouated wrath vehicle tracking of sod off-site T~m~ing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when vend speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabd¢ers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain preGpitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the proled where appropriate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infittretion inGude Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, dwersions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins 2) Post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) as outlined as Non-structural BMPs and Routine Structural BMPs shall be implemented as described on 2.1 and 2 2 lists detailed in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 3) Prior to issuance of building permts, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that vnll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistentwith the Gurde/mes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga rn June 2000 4) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply wrath obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storrs Water Pertmt from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pernit 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution . ~~ `~ ~iS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-42 DRC2003-01007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 7 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Macaas, Chavman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the folloMnng vote-to-Nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~t~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Rewew DRC2003-01007 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16369 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F,1~ °~~ Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-00239 and SUBTPM16167 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Citystaff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue regwring no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued. The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Commurnty Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ~J MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01007 and SUBTPM16369 Applicant: Charles Joseah Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn Date: November 12. 2003 t ~ •• .. . Air Quality -, ~n°;^- - 1M_.n e~;~~ ~~~.~ ma ;; ^ ~> '"~"';" ~~ ~ w .mss - w,. x ~-~ :Y ~, , ; All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that ail construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Mamtenancerecords shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shalt also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAOMD as well as City Planning Staff - All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAOMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following prows~ons • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C _ _Re~uew of Plans A/C _ 4 throw h seedin and waterin • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 ~ ,~ • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended enods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work enods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m CE C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn radices - • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling - Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , gO/CE C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 re wrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils gO/CE C Durng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A/C 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C ~ 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercal facdit~es shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial faalities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools T f 2 of 6 -. .. Ail industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D Z3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas Ail industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D Z3 more employees shall be required to configure then operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources `, t, ;, If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction - activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint _ • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 _ conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report eftects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA wdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent - - - - archiwn 1 i r C • 3~6 • 1 C .. • ... -. . .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate W here mitgation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures - _ • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time - dunn the interval of earth-disturbin actvities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately desert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods - "• ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~°-' ~" ~ "` The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes 4of6 -. .. Chemical sod stabd¢ers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and W afar Quality - ~ ~' ~ a°"" -;nn ' ~~ ~ ~=="~~ ~ ~ '- Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identdying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall ~dentifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) CE B/C/D Revew of Plans 2/4 as outlined as Non-structural BMPs and Routine A/C Structural BMPs shall be implemented as described on 2 1 and 2 2 tests detailed in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE 8/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtawng coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to - - - the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 5~ • ! ~ Key to Checklist Abbreviations Reaponslble Person Monftorlhg Frequency -' Method o4 VeriflcaUon' ~ m~"=. ' ~ ~- ' "-*" ~ Satictlona CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee A -With Each New Development A • On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction 8 -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bulding Permit CE -Cary Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdation 6of6 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01007 SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: 9300 SANTA ANITA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~A. General Requirements 1 The appltcant shall agree to defend at hts sole expense any actton brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or to the alternative, to reltngwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Ctty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-42, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the constructionlgradtng activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code • regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Comolehon Date -/-/. I / / ! / I /_I_ Pro)ect No DRC2003-01007 Completion Date D. E. 3 Occupancy of the taalities shall not commence until such time as all Unitorm Bulding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compltance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the tssuance of budding permtts 5 All site, grading, landscape, vrtgation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to tssuance of any permtts (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first ' 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compltance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all _/~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans to effect at the time of budding permit tssuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~_/_ by the Ctty Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the tssuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, tllumtnation, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner revtew and approval prior to the tssuance of bulding permtts 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults ~ 10 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified to a clear and concise manner, _/~ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Crty Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Ctty Planner and City Engineer revtew and approved prior to the issuance of building permits Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/ contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) ~ SC-1-04 ~\~ 1~ 2 Prgect No DRC2003-01007 Completion Date 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parkmg spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped , F G. 6 Motorcycle parkmg area shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parkingshall be a minimum of 56 square feet Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided m all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential prolects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the fast 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parkmg spaces W arehouse distnbution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results m a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parkmg close to the bwiding shall be provided for commercal, office, and industrial faalities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parkmg area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irngation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping m the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved m place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial prolects, and a minimum of 30% within commercal and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parkmg lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parkmg stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of balding -/-/- ~-/- / / / / ~~- I -/-/- ~~. ~~. ~~- -/~- -/-/. -// Protect No DRC2003-01007 Completion Date H. 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater ~_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften then appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy S For multi-family residential,and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for ~ /_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant matenal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/~_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~_/_ perimeter of this proiect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/~ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division ~ 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/~_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ~_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Division pnor to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ~_/_ approval prior to issuance of budding permits Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of ail mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete ail actions requred by the approved envvonmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for SC-1-04 4 [~t\/ \ ~ ~~ Protect No DRC2003-01007 Comoletion Date C~ mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits I APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map , All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map L. Street Improvements u Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and ail other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the bulidings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trell Median Island Bike Trail Other Santa Anita Avenue X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer L ~-~- -/~. -/~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- sc-l-oa ~1\I 1~c1 5 1~ Prgect No DRC2003-01007 Comoletlon Date d Stgnal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with fhe City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Santa Anita Avenue P A less than 8 feet Brachychlton populneus Bottle Tree 5 ft 25 fl o c 15-gal P A greater than 8 Platanus acenfolla London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 fl o c 15-gal feet or background Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the Clty inspector 3) Ail street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for ail protect Intersections, including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required / ~ ~-~_ ~~- ~-~- -~-~- ~~- ~-~- • -~-~- SC-1-04 ~`~ 11~ 6 Project No DRC2003-01007 •M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance anb disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adjacent areas 3 A permit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control Distract Is regwred for work within its right-of-way O. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed bythe Developer and the City will be regwred for Santa Anita Avenue P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential projects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 60% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to . the Engineering Droision when the first budding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project Comclelion Date _/~- ~J- ~-/ ~~- ~~- ~ / / _/_J- ~~- ~-~- _1_J_ SC-1-04 ~ l~/ \\\ 7 '(~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT • STANDARD CONDITIONS December 30, 2003 Charles Joseph and Associates Santa Anita Industrial complex W/S of Santa Anita WO 6`" st. DRC2003-1007 & SUBTPM16369 Buildings #3 & #4 must be built in accordance to the approved alternative method #05722. A fire flow letter from CCWD is required prior to permit Issuance. FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Flre Hydrants: The following provides general gwdance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fue hydrants in commerciaVindustrial prolects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential prolects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft d For single-family residential prolects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft e Fire hydrants are to be located 1 At the entrance(s) to a prolect from the existing publw roadways This includes subdivisions and industrial parks 2 At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Drnsion to meet operational needs 5 The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire 6 Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40' from any building Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Spnnklers• The required minimum fire flow for this prolect is 375 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station ~`~ \\~ Page 1 of 8 C~ monilonng This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Fiow: Public fue hydrants located withi a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow sublect to Fire Distr~t review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fue flow FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a fue hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding, on-site fue hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requred fue flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not Ime of sight 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fue hydrant foil each 1000 gpm of requred fue flow or fraction thereof, sublect to standard spaang and distribution requvements 3. Fire Sprinkler Underground: Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permil, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fue sprinkler system underground to the Fue Safety Dnrision for approval FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Regwred Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fve Distract Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requves an approved automatic fue sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following i a Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet i b All structures that do not meet Fue District access requvements (See Fue Access) c. When requved fue flow cannot be provided due to inadequate flow or pressure 2 Access Mitigation: Any structure or building that does not meet minimum Fue District access regwrements shall be protected by an approved automatic fue sprinkler system FSC-0 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined• Fue District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fue lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the fast story shall be located within 150-feet of Fue District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum specfications for private fue district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall not be larger than 24-feet c The outside tum radws shall be not less than 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent F 1~ ~~~~ Page 2 of 8 h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Access Doonvays• In addition to any exterior opening regwred by the Bwlding or Fire Code, approved doorways, accessible wthout the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, one or more approved access doors shall be provided in150 lineal feet or major fraction thereof along the exterior wall that faces regwred access roadways or walkwa s 5 Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings 6 Gates Standards: All gates shall be installed in accordance with Fire District Standards The following general design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must fully open with one second for each one foot of required width, e.g., 20-ft./20 sec c When fully open the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates on access roads designated "Emergency Services Use Only" may be manually opening e Gates on CommerciaVlndustrial facilities may be manually operated f After protect approval the applicant shall contact the Fire Safety Division for complete standard 7 Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fve vehicles Contact the Fve Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8 Fire Lane IdenYrfication: All regwred fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submAted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire lanes standard FSC-8 Fire Alarm System 1 Required Installation: An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system ~s requved by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard Refer to Ordinance 15 and/or the California Fire Code for specific requirements FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits-Technical Comments The below indicated permit regwrements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or building construction As noted below Special Permits may be requred, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific information Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any ac4vity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a place of public assembly 3 Operate a repair garage (Motor Vehicle H-4) 4 Flammable finishes r ~tV \\a Page 3 of 8 ~~ 5 Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanks, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating, and organic peroxides and dual component coatings (per booth fee) 6 Operate a mechanical refrigeration system (over 200-pounds of refrigerant) 7 Operate dust-producing processes and operations 8 Flammable and combustible ligwd (storage, handling, and/or use) Storage of flammable and~combustrble liquids rn outside aboveground storage tanks rs prohibited by Rancho Cucamonga Fire Code 9 High pled combustible storage ' 10 Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceedrng 100 gallons aggregate capacity) On a scaled site plan show the occupancy or use~pf all buildings wrthrn a ~ mile radus Storage exceedrng ' 100 gallons aggregate capacity rs not permitted wrthrn Jz mile of resrdental areas. 11 Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) 12 Compressed natural gas Bulk storage rs not permitted wrthrn a Yz mile radius of any resrdentral area Bulk storage rn non-resrdentral areas shall not exceed 183,000 aggregate capacity Contact Fire Safety Division for addrtronal rnforrnatron 13 Battery system - To install or operate lead-acid batteries over 100-gallon capacity 14 Cryogenics Flammable cryogenics are not permitted to be stored, dispensed, or used Contact the Fire Safety Division for addrtronal information ~ 15 Dry cleaning plant i 16 Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation 17 Tire storage -Open area used to store more than 1,000 cubic feet of tires 18. Wood products -Store more than 200 cubic feet of chips, lumber, plywood, or hogged material FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The San Bemardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bemardrno County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-8412 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the CaVEPA Certified Unrfied Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Certificate of Occupancy Restrictions: If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65650 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required rf regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 386-8412 for forms and assistance 2 Rental or Lease Properties: Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner f `\ \ \~ Page 4 of 8 FSC-72 Pian Submittal Required Notice Requued plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards FSC-14 Altemate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for atemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Altemate Method" form along with supporting documents PRIOR TO (PARCEL) MAP RECORDATION- For Each Development Phase 1. Pnor to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fve District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of'traffic signal preemption egwpment for the sunounding controlled intersections 2 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required point of Fire Distract access a Reqwres passage on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Does not access a public way, or c Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the adjacent property for use by the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan requred below The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division pnor to recordation To assist the Fue Safety Dvision in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a Title Report. A current title report, policy of title insurance, or other equivalent documentation proving ownership of all property included in the agreement b Legal Description A legal description of all property subject to the agreement c Assessor's Parcel Numbers. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement d Site Plan: The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of Pnvate Roadways and Fire Lanes listed above A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radu, load-beanng capacity of roadway surtace, etc shall be provided 3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances thereto a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner's granting a non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, fire hydrants, and bwlt-in fve protection systems The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Fire Safety Division The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The agreement shall be approved by the Fire Safety Division prior to recordation ~~ \\~ Page 5 of 8 • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for he private water main system for ~ omply with Fue District standards rewew and approval by the Fue District Plans and installation shall Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distract Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installs ,flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwldmg materials on-site (i e., lumber, roofing materials, etc ) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division 3 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permd, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water Distract On the plan show all existing fire hydrants wdhin a 600-toot radius of the protect 4 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwldmg materials on-sde (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bulder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fue Safety Division Contact Water Distract to schedule testing 5 Building Use Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any bwldmg permds, The applicant shall submd a detailed letter of intended use for each bwldmg on-site to the Fire Distract for rewew and approval A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fire Distract comments Prowde a separate letter for each budding or structure with storage use areas 6 Combustible Construction Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of a budding pennrt for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distract on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that megts Fue Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-sile The roadway shall be maintained at all times PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fue Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fue Construction Services 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit: Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for rewew and approval No work is allowed without a Fue Construction Services permit 3 Fire Sprinkler System- Final Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Sprnkler Monitoring The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred wdh 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies 5 Fire Suppression System: Plans and speaf~cations for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment or other special hazard shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services for rewew and approval No work is allowed without a Fue Construction Services pennR 6 Fire Alarm System: Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submrtted to Fue Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed wdhout a Fue Distract permd ~`~ \\~ Page 6 of 8 7 Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted poor to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Dvision for specific details and ordering information 8 Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance wdh Fire District Standards Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 9 Site Directory: A bwlding or sde directory shall be provided, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20-feet of each primary entrance to the site The sde directory shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with Fire Safety Division Standards b Standard Directory in bwlding lobby 10 Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibd parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documentetl The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fue lanes Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 11 Address- Other Than Single-family. New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum $-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 12 Mutti-unit Complexes: In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwlding identrfication letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, sudes, or bwldings The Fue District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fire Suppression Systems- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Service Construction Seances 14 Frre Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing: Prior to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, the fue alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services 15 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is required to obtain a Fue District Permit for Storage of High-pile Combustible material 16 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans: The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fue Construction Services The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fue Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classification for the bwlding ~s designated as Group S, D~wsion 2, commodities stored shall be limited to light hazard classrfication only 17 Hazardous or Flammable Liquid Storage Tanks- County Review: The plans for flammable or hazardous ligwd storage tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Fue Department, Hazardous Materials Divisionlfank Program Contact County Fue Dept at (909) 386-8407 18 Hazardous or Flammable Ligwd Storage Tanks- Fire District Revrew: The plans for hazardous or flammable ligwd storage tanks shall also be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Distract, Fue Safety Division Contact RC Fue Dept at (909) 477-2770 19 Business Emergency/Contingency Plan: The applicant shall submit a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for emergency release or threatened release of hazardous materials and wastes or provide a letter of exemption Contact the County Fue Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division at (909) 386-8412 20 Submittal to the Fire District. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the County Fue Department approved Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fue District In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs ~`~ \\~, Page 7 of 8 • 21 Required County Permits: The applicant shall be regwred to apply for one or more of the following Hazardous Materials Handler Permit, a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit, an Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, and/or an Underground Storage Tank Permit Contact the County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials DrnsioNField Services Section at (909) 384-8407 22 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subtect building or property ~~- \~~ Page 8 of 8 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE April 14, 2004 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, MPA SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etlwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on 9 87 acres of land In the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway Interchange - APN 0228-011-31 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003- 00t)48 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to master plan and develop a RV storage faculty on 9 87 acres of land in the Low Resldentlal Dlstnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 and I-15 freeway Interchange - APN 0228-011-31 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - 210 Interchange, 210 Freeway South - Vacant land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - I-15 Interchange, I-15 Interchange West - Etlwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel, Open Space B General Plan Designations Protect Slte - Low Resldentlal North - 2101nterchange South - Low Resldentlal East - I-151nterchange West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C Slte Characteristics Thls "landlocked" vacant parcel has no mature trees on the site The site has a gentle north to south fall of 28 feet The 210 and the I-15 freeway Interchange border the site to the north and east To the south is vacant land and to the west Is the Etlwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel ITEMS G and H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 2 D Parkin .There are three parking spaces for clients and the manager caretaker complex. In addition are five RV and boat spaces that will used as temporary spaces while the clients negotiate for onsite storage space. ANALYSIS A. Etiwanda Soeafic Plan Amendment. In contunction with the development proposal, the applicant is requesting the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended to allow Recreational and Vehicle (RV) and boat storage at the proposed location This amendment would only be in the Low (L) Residential Distract subtect to a Conditional Use Permit and special development criteria Because the applicant's proposed protect is bordered by two major freeway systems, and not directly adtacent to residential uses, staff agrees with the applicant's request. This location would be better swted for RV and boat storage in comparison to single- famdy and multi-family residences, which would be adtacent to the freeways. It is very dubious that staff would receive any noise complaints caused by the proposed protect. Staff recommends that the language in the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended as follows. Part l/Chapter 5 5.22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Add rn the "L° D~stnct 202 Other Uses Table that "Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat freewavs " GENERAL. The protect only includes approval of Phase I (see Exhibit °A°) Phase 2, located south of the protect site, is a master plan concept for future development and will regwre a separate Conditional Use Permit application and approval The protect, a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility, contains 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats Access to the landlocked site will be from Victoria Avenue, Lust west of the I-15 Freeway, along a San Bernardino County flood control service road A Design Revew Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, budding elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping on July 15, 2003, and January 20, and February 17, 2004. At the last design review meeting, the Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) recommended approval subtect to design recommendations. A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of Approval G,~ ~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • April 14, 2004 Page 3 B Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on July 15, 2003 The Committee recommended approval A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendation has been included m the Resolutions of Approval C Technical Review Committee• The Technical Review Committees reviewed the protect on July 15, 2003, and recommended approval subtect to the standard conditions outlined in the Resolutions of Approval , D Environmental Assessment. The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II and the Environmental Checklist It was determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts to short-term air and water quality dunng construction from grading, equipment exhaust, erosion, and water runoff Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air and water quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 and that it be forwarded to the City Council for final action Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Respectfully submit[ed, Brad Bu er City Planner BB DF Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Budding Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Design Review Comments Exhibit "E" - Applicant's Amendment Justification Letter Exhibit "F" - Irntial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 . Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 ~~`\~ ~ w~urr. r .ussaua-- -_f -_ __ _ -_pn`~ I ~I~Ie I'I .... ....u ~ ~ laLL9H10!(R1 ::::~ ::::::::. ' ...... ~ ; a~vcro~.s iv~r sovoesso~ro E ~~ ~ p ~,I i ~-~~~ "/~(' \~ t ~ ~'s {lil ~ ~ tili!1 ~ ~~ I~ ' ~s !+ Q rr i 3~ E~ ~ ~~ 14 ~ !! G,hy r Q i I i I r~ ~ ~~~' Z a ~_ ~ y; i i I I O .:.;-..-~wj I .:~ I ''''- I r i _ ~_ _ _ __~_ - r~ ~ I ~ I --~ ~ r~l I lJ LJ ' ~ L ~ j _, ~ I i--_1 ~ I L ~ I 1 _._- I __~ . I 1 I - ~ ' `J I ~ I - --I-- --- ~ ~ I I I I _L -- -~--"--- Y°• Grp pu I I I I I I ..~ ~ ~ L______________________________J 2ND FLOOR PLAN p~ ~- ~:_ r 1 ~"r ~ E ~' ,ter' I ~ I ~- ~-~ - - ---- , ; -~-; t .~® ® ;lid` i`` it O ~ - I_-_._ i ® 1 - i:~ I ~~I-_- 1 I___ _ ' - - ;- _ - _-1-® I it ;!~- --- ~ - - ~ ~ :I { O O ~ ~~ ~ f3T FL~LAN t~~3 .~~ ~• ~: ~• ~.. !!! tl} ~' W V ~ I 0 VJ Q :.. ~ f'~ ~vNi€ t. I ~ U~~ ~~ ' .r e..~.~. ,..» A2.1 .~,~,~, ~ . .......:............ - - - ~,,;, I I~I~I~I,I g~ I Q ........•,..::...., .::.:: aovaacs~va savoassoaa i 131 I C I I I I ...: -«i~.~-~ II O-- ri}- ,;~-;-r---~ I G; ~~ o- i ; o'^- ©- ;;~ ~~~ _ , IA ~ IE ;I ~ __ 's ~, a ~~~~. I O O I~ 'r ; _~-~ F .~ 0 ~ I' i 1 V f ~ ~' I I r~ f- ~"' ~~ _ _ ______ i I u ~ ® ~ Q I I I t ~ ' I ~ I ~ .. • I t4 ~ I I i__ I t4 ~ i I I ~ I ~~~ ~- r~pp LJ) ~ I 4 I I I I ~ ` I t9 i I r~ r~ p J • LJ ~ LJ s . G ~ ~ ~ ------ --- • TYPICAL COVERED RN 8TORAC,1~ PORT PARTIAL.QLAN w ~ _ ~. . _. _.___ ~, :, ` a~~,. ,~~„ , , , TYPICAL COVERED RN 3TORAQE PORT FRONT ELEVATION WPM r`rwwe , ~ ~ ~~--i~~.wr _ ~ __~ _. _ _ wrwr~ _ ~~ l ~~ ENLARGED TYPICAL COVERED RN STORAQE PORT FRONT ELEVATION ,..~ ~~ ,~, _~ w_. Iv _ w ~«. I ri TYPICAL END ELEVATION ~` ~e ' ~6 ~~. I~ ii ~ w I. Q ~, a I p~ I 5 ~O U~ I nnw w ~m~rlwr ~' ' ' A32 TYPICAL COVERED RN 8TORAQE PORT REAR /ROADWAY ELEVATION '~ ~' I ~ ~ ~.~~ . q ~ ~~ ~~. _~.~~ ;, .~. . x ~ { - M_ =. ~~ ~~:._ ~ ? ~~ , ~ ~~-------- r M MAY' w~11R~ w I .r - r TYPICAL COVERED RN STORAQE PORT SECTION (BLOCK WALU ~- i ,: ~:~. ~:. :. ~~~ ~~ ', v ~ Q m ~, ~o~ ~~~ ~~ ,~ 'wna+w~ rr~ ~rw i A5.1 ............... .,.... a~vtrals nra sovoessoua Q i i I i I ~ ~ ;m~ i C J ~- i Z i C~ -- ' , I --- -----G~-,-H~-- - --------- ------------ (~?- aovaolsnia savodss ~ ~I~ItI'I ~~ I ~ ~, s„,~.,..,~.., G;~ - ----- --- - ---- -------- - -~~ ~ ~ - { v-- - -- -- -- ----- ~-__ -.-= lj~~~~ __ ~ ~~ -~_~ ~ ,s~'l,9 ~e~sw ~d ~~O ~9~ ,......:.~a..°.L... • mmiw rwnna mo FRWY ~ANS~¶pN ~:~. ~:_ _. I _ z,p ~ ~ ~~ .~._ 4 ,~ -.._ _ ~:~ ~ ~- .~._ -~- ----- ~.__.__ GONGEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN g~ -'- ~-i • ~X~~cr r`Ct` C~,~~1` DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS I • 7:40 P.M. Doug Fenn February 17, 2004 ENVJRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 - CHARLESJOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct a recreational vehicle storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer interchange of the 210 >Jnd 15 Interstate Freeways interchange - ' APN: 0228-011-31 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present• Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Doug Fenn The applicant requested that the Design Review Committee review the proposed revisions to the project. He presented revised plans that show the changes as required by the Committe@ at the January 20, 2004 meeting. The changes were: 1. A landscape planter is provided along the south property line. ' 2. The applicant depicted the changes to the rear of the buildings with higher pilasters, the four . decorative elements to be adjacent to each other in a row all facing the 210 Freeway on-ramp as it merges into the I-15 Freeway. 3. Additional trees at the north portion of the property and changes to the Conceptual Landscape Plan. The Committee recommended approval of the proiect to the Planning Commission with the condition that the design of the Landscape Plan shall be subiected to City Planner review and approval. ri r 1 LJ ~„ N 12 . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:10 P.M. Doug Fenn January 20, 2004 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility including a caretaker's quarters on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer interchange of the 210 and 15 Interstate interchange - APN 0228-011-31. Background: This project was review by DRC on July 15, 2003 and recommended for revisions. Attached are the July 15, 2003 DRC Action Comments. The applicant was instructed to work with Staff and return the protect to DRC as a Consent Item. However, Issues still remain and staff is of the opinion that progress on this project has been with a minimalist approach. Because of this, Staff is not returning the protect as a Consent Item and the below referenced ftems must be fully addressed: Staff Comments: Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The covered R.V. storage buildings should stronoly "reflect the architectural °elements° of • the caretaker's residence. 2. The building wall along the south property boundary needs to be architecturally treated to break up the monotonous design or provide a 20-foot landscape area. 3. Provide a Conceptual Landscape Plan showing the density of trees at the north side of the site as required by the Planning Commission at the Pre-application meeting. Provide sight line studies and illustrative sections to prove that the area is screened from freeway view. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and Ume permitting, the Committee will discuss the following sewndary design issues: 1. Provide decorative pavement within dnve entry throats (outside public right-of-way). 2. Access gates shall be opaque. 3. Provide the nver rock columns to the Detailed Shop. 4. Delete six parking spaces to the west of the protect across the manager's office because of conflict with the entry area. 5. No outdoor lighting shall spill over unto neighboring residential neighborhoods. 6 The applicant shall apply for a Uniform Sign Program Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee address major and secondary issues and return before the Committee for review C J ~l ~~ 1~ DESIGN REVItVV C.UMMtrv i a 8:00 p m. Doug Fenn I July 15, 2003 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2002-Og544- CHARLESJOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct a recreational vehicle storage facility including a caretaker's quarters on 9.87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer interchange of the 210 and I-15 interstate interchange - APN: 0228-011-31. Design Parameters: The protect is a single phased `development. Phase two is located south of the project sfte and is a master plan concept for future development. The prolect, a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility, contains165 covered storage spaces, 276 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Access to the sfte will be via Victoria Avenue. No off site signage will be allowed and staff is recommending that a Uniform Sign Program be implemented because of the proximity of the freeways and single-family residences to the south. Stall Comments: Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: 1. The office and caretaker and has a colonnade on the west and south sides with some dry • stack vertical elements. Because the sde is within the Etiwanda Specrfic Plan area, the building design should reflect a historic craftsman/bungalow style. Provde decorative treatment and elements such as but not limited to battered shape river rock columns, dormers, reftertails, triangular braced supports, sidings, molding trim around windows, river rock wainscot around the unit, and other residential elements to complimentthe neighboring residences to the west. Use flat file for the roof instead of metal. 2. The covered R.V storage buildings should better reflect the architectural elements of the caretakers residence. The proposed surface material treatment next to the 4-foot recessed area should wrap to the recessed area. The material should be of river rock. Provide the same river rock columns treatment to the ends of each covered storage building. 3. The building wall along the south property boundary needs to be architecturally treated to break up the monotonous design or provide a 20-foot landscape area. 4. Provide a Conceptual Landscape Plan showing the density of trees at the north side of the site as required by the Planning Commission at the Pre-application meeting. Provide sight line studies and illustrative sections to proof that the area is screened from freeway view. Secondary Issues. Once all of the mafor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Provide decorative pavement within drive entry throats (outside public right-of-way). 2. Access gates shall be opaque. • 3. Provide the river rock columns to the Detailed Shop ~„ ~11y DRC COMMENTS DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • July 15, 2003 Page 2 4. Delete 6 parking spaces to the west of the protect across the managers office because of conflict with entry area. 5. No outdoor lighting shall spill over unto neighbonng residential neighborhoods. 6. Applicant shall apply for a Unrform Sign Program. ' Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee address major and secondary issues and come back before the Committee for review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Pam Stewart, Christine McPhail, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Doug Fenn The applicant agreed to address the identified mafor and secondary design issues of the staff comments. Staff stated m the meeting that item no. 6 of the secondary issues would be taken care of as a condition of approval. The Committee asked the applicant to provide a vertical element treatment to the recessed area for the covered RV storage building. The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff m revising the plans to address all the identified issues. Once staff determined that the revised plans have satisfactonly addressed the identified issues, then the protect could be forwarded back as a Consent Item. ~,,N ~S Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIGPRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES January 14, 2003 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re: Crossroads 210/15 Freeway R~ V. Storage Facility Request to Amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Dear Brad: 'YoF~ch~ OC 9~, /gNj~~o U~'~oy~ ~,p 0,~ This is as a follow-up to a number of meetings and conversations with you, Planning staff and City Pre-Application Review concerning the referenced matter This correspondence is to formalize our request that the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended to allow Recreational Vehicle/Self Storage as a permitted use in ~ Residential Zoning where the site is generally surrounded by freeway and flood control facilities. The proposed protect is located at the SWC of the 210/15 Freeway Interchange . and east and adtacent the County Flood Control channel. Existing freeway and interchange improvements generally surrounds the site on the north, east and south. The property is zoned for Residential Land Use, however the site is unsuitable for residential housing due to flood control channel and freeway impacts that would be associated with any residential development at this site Our intention is to design and construct a full service Recreational VehiGe Storage facility and to our knowledge, there are no existing facilities offering this type of service in Rancho Cucamonga. This proposed use would be very compatible with the existing residential uses located west of the flood control channel, as our site access would be taken from Victona Street and north into the site using County Flood Control access roads The proposed protect will be open seven days a week from 8.00 a m. to 600 p m., with restricted card key access available until 8 00 p m. for business tenants This proposed protect has been reviewed with existing residents west of the site and has received favorable response and preference over any additional residential development. As you may be aware, driving and recreational vehicle travel has hit new demand levels, and is currently the preferred mode of travel for secunty and convenience We also believe that this protect will be a positive addition to the City and provide a level of service and convenience that is needed in this community and should serve to help reduce on-street recreational vehicle parking in the City Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 Caty Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd ,Sucre 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION As you Hell recall, this proposed project received favorable response by the Planning Commission at the July 16, 2002, Pre-Application Review, and the project design submitted to the City as part of this Design/Development Rewew process is with the intent to incorporate this City feedback into this project We appreciate the conLnuing professional courtesy and assistance extended by City Planning vinth our proposed project Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance with this matter Sincerely, Charles J. Buquet Charles Joseph Associates G,1~ 1~ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ JAN 14 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL RECENED-PLANNING INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ~Y oI Raedn qa tYPe or prbrt ekraAy usln9 bdc Use fhe rab key fo move from one ~e [o fhe next Ibis.) 9 DlNnlun teos) m-rrso The 'purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinartcass, and Guidelines; the-•Califomia Environmental' Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Prticedur'es~to-lmplement,CEQA.__.It is'importar~#hat the infom~ation requested in this ...applicatiQri'tie;provided~in.futl:, , , - .. ~ . INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d is fhe rasponstbildy ofthe app/x~M to ensure that fhe app/aatan rs complete at the tune of submdtal, Cdy staff wdl rat be evadable to perform work regtured to prowde mrssrng ndorrnatron Application Number for the prgecY to which flu /orm pertaurs' Pre-application filed July 16, 2002 DRC 2002-00544 ~,LZCD3-t~~-7 ~ ~RC?,oo3-07JZJ~ Pro/ect Idle Crossroads R V Storage ~ Nerve 8 Address of pro/ed owner(s) Bruno Mananelh 7285 SVL Box, Vxdorville, CA 92392 Name 8 Address of devebper w proled sponsor Charles Joseph Assoaates 10881 Foothill Blvd Sude 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Address Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Assoaates 10681 Foothill Bhrd Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name 8 Address of person propanrg this Iorm (d ddferent born above) As shown above, Charles Joseph Assoaates ~fephorre Number 909 481-1822 r Info form RC ~ , , 1 '^ Created on 12/Z2002 440 PM `\ - C~ '1) Provide a lull scale (&12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which rnGudes the proled sde, end mdreete the sde boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representable views into the site from the north, south, east and west, vrews into and from the sde Irom the primary access points that serve the site, and representable views of srgnficent features from the sde Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Prolecf Location (describe) Southwest of 210-15 Freeway Interchange 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet dnecessary) 0228-011-31-000 5) Gross Sde Area (adsq ft) g 86 +l_ '6) Net Sde Area (tote/ sde see minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cahons) 9 86 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect fhe pro/ect sde (attach addd~onal sheet if necessary) Speaflc Plan Amendment to allow recreational vehicle/self storage as a permuted use m resdential zone where sue Is generally surrounded by freeway and flood control channels. 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permds which will be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga end other governmental agencres in order to fulty implement the pro/ed Grading and Bwldmg Permits • 9) Describe the physical setting of the sde es d exists before the proled inGudmg information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (including age and conddion) and the use of the structures Attach photogaphs of significant features described In edddion, cde all souroes of information (~ e , geologrce/ and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, tre/fic studies) Currently vacant land wuh weeds/vegetation on sue There are no stuctures See attached Biological Study performed on November 24, 2002 Enw Info form RC G 1 1 ` ` \ Created on 12/2/2002 440 PM Information indicated by an asterisk (7 is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stafi C~ 10) Describe the known cultural and/or hrstonca/ espeds of the site Crle all sources of rnformehon (books, published reports end oral history) i There are no known htstoncal or cultural aspects on thls slte ~ • 11) Describe any Horse sources end them levels that now effect the site (arrrxaft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Erashng roadway and freeway nose that III not affect proposed use of property 12) Describe the proposed protect rn detail ihrs should provide an adequate descnpbon o/the site rn terms of uft~mate use that will result Irom the proposed proled lndreate rfthere are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach addrt~onal sheet(s) rf necessary Recreabornal Vehicle Storage Faalrty conslshng of surface storage stalls as well as car port storage facllrhes Maintenance/sertnce bays, on sde office and caretaker reslden6al faallty • Enw Info form RC 1.-„ N 2~ Created on 12/2!2002 440 PM 13) Descnbe the srmoundmg properties, rncudmg mformatron on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstorrca/, w scenic espeds indicate the type of land use (resrdent~al, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-famry, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, Irontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) North-210 Freeway South-Undeveloped properties owned by County Flood Control East-15 Freeway West-Undeveloped resrcienUal zoned property 14) lMll the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale w character of the surrounding general area of fhe pro~ed~ No this project Noll enhance the area that Is currently vacant land The property Is currently zoned for residential R1 Thls project use will have less Impact then residential and ~ a needed use for the area. 15) indicate the type o/short-t3rm and long-term Horse to be generated, mcludmg source end amount How will these Horse levels affect ad/scent properties and orFSrte uses What methods of soundproofing ere proposed? Short term construction noise onty, no long term Impacts '16) Indicate proposed removals and/wreplacements o/mature or scenic trees None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drerns County of San Bernardino Flood Control Faculty directly weslt 1of and adjacent to project Enh IMo rortn RC ~ N ~` Created on 72I7J2002440 PM 1 Preliminary meeting with the Director of County Flood Control has determined they are amenable to having our protect site directly dram Into their exrshng channel 18) Indicate expelled amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanbcahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water D~strrd at 987-2591 e Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaVDay) b Commeroral/Ind (gaUday/ac) 3.000 Peak use (gaUmiNac) 6.000 19) Iridreate proposed method of sewage dispose! ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer tt septic Lanka ere proposed, attach percolation tests hdischarge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate ' expelled daily sewage gerieratwn (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /rather danhcetion, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Disbid et 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) b Commercialrlndustna! (gaUday/ec) 2000 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenba/units N A Detedied (ridreate range of parcel saves, mrmmum tit srze and mexirnum lot srze N/A Attadred (indicate whether units ere rental or for sale units) N/A 21) Ardicipated range of sale prices and/or rents Se/e Pnce(s) to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type pl/A 23) indicate antrcrpated household srze by unit type S Erin Info form RC ~ ~ ~`7 Created on 12/212002 440 PM ~ I [~ 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be resrdmg wrthm the pro/er.M Contact the appropriate School Dtstnds as shown m Attachment B a Elementary n/a b Jurnor High c Senwr Hrgh Recreational VeMcle Storage Faalfty with maintenance faahttes and on sRe office/caretaker resrdence Office/caretaker 1,200 square feet-Vehlde Detail Area 1,800 square feet Storage Area 101,096 square feet COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) end mapr function(s) of commerotal, industrial or mstdutronal uses 26) Total tktor area of commeroral, industrial, or rnstitutana/ uses by type 27) lnd~cate hours of operation 7 Days a week Office/Caretaker 8 A M to 6 P M Card Key Access for tenants unftl 8 00 PM 28) Numbero/amployeas Total Maxrmum ShAt Time of Maximum Shdt 29) ProvMe breakdown of ent~pated/ob clessrricetrons, mGudmg wage and salary ranges, es well as an mdreahon of the rate of hve for each Gassrficetion (attach addrfronal sheet Anecessary) One On Site Caretaker, Two maintenance staff ~) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currentty reside m the City unknown at this time '31) For commerota/ end industrial uses onty, mdraate the source, type end amount of air pollution em~ssrons (Data should be venhed through the South Coast Air QualRy Management District, at (81 B) 572-8283) RV Traffic In and out of the facllrly Access to stte Nell be wa County Flood Control Frontage Roads from yctona Street Errvi Info form RC ~ t " 2~ Created on 12/2/2002 440 PM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/act been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ecru Ifso, please indicate therrres Inse All agenaes contacted have indicated then ability to provide adequate sernce to the protect site 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mafenals ~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic mafenals include, but ere not limited to PCB's, red~oedrve substances, pesbades and herbiades, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammab/e l~qurds end gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the mafenals end descnbe their use, storage, aridror discharge on the property, as well es the dates of use, rf known 34) ~// the proposed pro/act involve the temporary or bng-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mafenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above if yes, provide an inventory of all such mafenals to be used end proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage end shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~catron plans Regular vehicle maintenanas mafenals such as an above ground hoist, oils, solvents, battenes Matenals will be disposed of by a Vicensed Hauler Business operabons will be conducted consistent with all applicable standards and requirements 1 hereby certey that the statements famished above and in the attached exMbits present the data and informabon required for adequate evaluation ofthrs pro/act to the best of my ability, that the fads, statements, and information presented ere true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and be/ref I further understand that additional rn/ormahon may be requimd to be submitted before en adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 1/13/02 Signature President Trt/e Envi Into form RC ~ y ~ 2y Crested on 12/212002 4 4o PM • ~... _. i COI OGtCAI $+CiEN•L C-v November 2002 9~ >:-~F prare v Sfte Photographs 12-acre Sete G,,~ 2s View to north from western property boundary VIeW TO nOfTrl I ICUI JVUII R-Vmcn i vv.. w.... r...,~_.., .J Etiwanda Flood Control Chaim r ~t ' tax ~ .+ t pW> ~.¢enx'>° '$f ~. o i ~. ~ t. n1.n .n .>..~ .. ~' a i~f: ra ~ '~' ~ - ~.. ~^ .u ~. u. ~ ...ru~wna.... ., .,_. s~1!. d ,. dew to south along wesrern property ovuncxaiy ~°'`~ rcox.oc~cnx SC{E~+CES November 2002 plate .SD Site Photographs. 12-acre Sde ~,~ 2l~ View to east from near center of site C~Ty OF RANCHO CUCgMONGA JAN 1 q 2003 RECENEp _ p~NN~N~ ,.. _ -, ~ ;~ fir;."_ s _ _ ...: ~ = a.~- -_ ~ ~ r ~.. G~~lf~n~ftS Ar-C y1 4 St El - -* ~~~ Pyi. - _ ^ _ ;•_ _ _ A ~ _; X27 ~ .~- „a~~~~ = z~;~ ~ I i I ? -- '. ~ - - - 1 -- I i^ _ ~- '- -{ I ..i ,, ; . at. .L I ---- { _ _ _ t. ~ • a - ~ j / , ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~` , '. .~ ~; - - i` - _ - f _. i;l City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Etiwanda Specific Plan DRC2003-00047 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Ebwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage for the southwest parcel on 9 87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of the 210 Freeway and I-15 interchange -APN 0228-011-31 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A master plan request to construct a RV storage factlity on 9 87 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling unds per acre), located at the southwest comer of the 210 Freeway and the I-15 interchange -APN 0228-011-31 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Bivd , Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The 210 Freeway off-ramp bounds the site to the north, which transitions into the I-15 on-ramp to the east To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed protect (but is not part of this proposal) To the west of the site is a flood control channel, and single-family homes beyond The subtect site is vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south There is no significant vegetation on the site and no improvements 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number Douglas Fenn (909) 477-2750 ir1 C,~2~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Access road rights from San Bernardino County Flood Control District GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx - Ndrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Au Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (x) Air Qualdy ()Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology/Soils ()Hazards & Hazardous (x) Hydrology/1Nater Quality ()Land Use/Planning Materials ()Noise ()Population/Housing () Mineral Resources ()Recreation () Transportationlfraffic ()Public Services ()Mandatory Findings of Significance ()Utilities/Service Systems DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed prolect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (X) I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions m the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared () I find that the proposed prolect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred () I find that the proposed prolect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remarn to be addressed () I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or C~ ,1~ 2`~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 mitigated pursuant to ti mitigation measures that Prepared By Douglas Reviewed By Dan NEGATIVE DECLARAITION, including revisions or ie proposed protect, no}}hang further is re/gwred -~ Date ~ 'i Date ~~/" ~ ~a 3~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Leas men SiOnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenaelly Siprvficam WM ALUpebon Than Sipnficent No I Ineo tea ~ ~ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect , a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limded to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwidings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (/) quality of the sde and as surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the areas , Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect sde The sde ~s not within a caeca corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 ~J b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic butldings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways wdhin the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the I-15 on- ramp to the east To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed protect (but is not part of this proposal) To the west of the site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond. The subtect site is vacant with an overall.fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south There is no significant vegetation on the site and no improvements The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design rewew is regwred pnor to approval City standards regwre the developer to underground existing and new utility Imes and factldies to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect wilt create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant `.J 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agncultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract Cam, t N `~\ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less 71ien 9pruficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s;~~; Mm~oon a, ~, N, I n Ir¢o ad ~ ~ ad c) Involve other changes in the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transdions into the I-15 on-ramp to the east To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed project (but is not part of this proposal) To the west of the sde is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond The subject sde is vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south There is no signrficant vegetation on the site and no improvements There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-thud is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and earstem portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres tp 30 acres, and their economic wabtlity is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended tp be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the Cdy c) The site is not farmland The nearest agricultural use (vineyard) is more than 1 mile southwest from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable av quality plan b) Violate any au quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected ar quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitatroe thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people G,ti 3a • Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Leas m~ Siprvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information S P°'e"fi°"Y "`"" man pp g ources Siprvficent IMtipe4on Siprvficent No I Iron tetl 1 ect I Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated s b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels wdhin the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and egwpment work and operate at one development sde until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Au Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. u 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering G ,133 Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 less men 9p^ificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources sv~~~ M wro, patron rnan Sigrvficam No I n Intro ea I cl • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. i • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWaCB]) daily to reduce PM~p emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 7) Chemicei soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 56) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 56-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~p would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide Increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council r~ LJ In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented ~,a3a Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~~~, Sipnficenl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paen4a1y 9pnficam `""" Mrtipetlon ~"~" $iprvficent No I ecl Ingo tetl I 1 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high etticlency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a signrficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase In emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than tha population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residerces, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic factlities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within less than 1/4 mile from the nearest sensitive receptor single-family residences to the west across a flood control channel Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated ~,~1 n~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Lass man $,p,uficent Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fmenfially Sipnihcant wnn MNpaban may 9prvficarrt No I n Intro e0 I 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either dvectly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identrfied as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, pollees, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and W ildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlrfe Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, ~ venial pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means i d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlrfe species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation poucy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habRat conservation plan Comments• a) The prolect site is located m an area developed with homes, freeways, and flood control facilities The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated ~,,a ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Then Sipnifiranl less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Siprvficant wren M2petlan men SipNfirern No I act Ineo etl I C I e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance The protect site is not located within a conservation area according'to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () 0 significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a °Historic Resource° per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Amercans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage G, N ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 I ea<man S~pnfiwm Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g Pmannaliy 9prnficam wnn rAapaoon lean Si9rufitaM No I Into ted I I • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and aroposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bemardmo County database, no paleontological sties or resources have been recorded within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quatemary period, when the last 'Ice Age" anb the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quatemary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated r\ L_J ~t~ `~v Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Paemialir Significant wan AUbpatlm Than Sipnficent No ~ Inco ted ~ ~ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving Q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alqu~st-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) m) Seismic-related ground fatlure, including () () () (/) hquefaction~ w) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsod~ () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or sotl that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have sons incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is tt in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hdl Fault, passes within 1 5 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 25 miles north These faults are both capable of produang Mw 6.0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„,7 5 earthquakes is 5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„. 8 2 earthquakes, is 7 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following G,~ `~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 ~~ m~ Signigcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g aae^ne~~Y Sigrobcent wrtn A4bgebon men Sgn,ficant No I Into ea I n fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. ' 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aqufer The protect woulii not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types onsite consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand and Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand soil associations according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand and Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand soil associations according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3. These soils are typically excessively or somewhat excessively drained nearly level to moderately sloping soil on alluvial tans Runoff is slow to very slow, and the hazard of soil blowing is moderate to high on bare soil In unprotected area, however, the hazard of soil blowing is high No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternauve wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) envronment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the enwronment~ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school ~,~ yo • Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less ma„ $gnificeM Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially S,B~~~~ent WM Miogeoon Then Si~ificem No I ^ Inm rztetl I ~ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public arport or public use airport, would the protect result m a safety hazard for people residing or working m the protect area f) For a protect within the wcmity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working m the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, mtury or death mvolwng wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates m a countywide mteragency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concemmg the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for signficant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates m a countywide mteragency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) The Etiwanda High school is to the southwest of the protect is lust over a 1/4 of a mile from the protect site However, this type of protect will not generate students due to the fact that it is a RV storage facility No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated G 1 ~ `11 Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP fd Peen"~"'' Sigmficent wnn MNgebon ~"~" Signifirant No I act Inro etl I ecl eel e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 4 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is~ffnticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wddland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Pian 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-7. I 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect~ I a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-sde~ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps J G,~ ~~ ~_~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less men $,QNQC811~ Le55 Issues and Supporting Information Sources SgruficeN MN~Ean $ip ~~ Nu ~ i~ ~~ i i h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows () () () (/) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by se~che, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is prowded by the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the Citys water is currently prowded from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect wdl not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will requve the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water faalities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented. 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance Infiltration Include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm dram faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Offiaal and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signficant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwiding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase m runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect wail cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to l/t-~h~,e amount of new building and hardscape ~'' 1 1 Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Lexa Then $ipn,ficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotenually Si0^~ficam Wah FLapaoon Than ^agmficent No I Into te0 I proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result m substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, mcrease in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated ' f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result m a temporary mcrease in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows dunng a concurrent storm event, thus resulting m surface water qualRy impacts The following mdigation measures shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000.1 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the Cary This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City ~J G,~ yy Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Lau Then S,pNI¢ent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polenbalir $ipnificanl wnn Mitlpeban Than Sipnficent No I Inco tatl I I 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect a) Physically droide an established community O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the I-15 on- ramp to the east To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed protect (but is not part of this proposal) To the west of the site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond The subtect site is vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south There is no significant vegetation on the site and no improvements The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Low Residential A Specific Plan amendment is proposed to allow this type of use on the property This use may be more suitable than residential because the site is adtacent to the 210 and I-15 interchange WRh the allowance of the Specrfic Plan Amendment, the proposed protect would be consistent with the General Play: and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no adverse impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () (/) ( ) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () (/) ( ) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments• a/b) The southerly portion of the site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan, Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1 The site's small size and access through residential areas makes mining impractical, and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery due to conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surtace mining G,,~ y5 Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less men S,pn,fiteM less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~o~fi~; M,W~nan s. ~r~em No ~ IncO ted ~ ecl ecl operations Conversely, the open flood control basin to the south offers greater aggregate mining opportundies The impact is considered IesS than sigrnficant 11. NOISE. Would the prolect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of rSoise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenaes~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excesswe () () () (/) groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the prolect viandy above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () () () i(/) ambient noise levels in the prolect vicirnty above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, O O O (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public arport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels? f) For a prolect within the vicindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect ores to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The prolect sde is wthin an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out, however, the proposed storage use would not expose large numbers of people to noise The prolect site is almost at the same elevation as the freeway transdion lane from the 210 Freeway to the 1-15 The construction of these buildings will act as an additional sound barrier for the residential neighborhood to the west The storage use wdl not produce excessive noise The primary source of noise affecting the prolect is traffic from Route 210 and I-15 Freeways At build-out in the year 2020, future noise levels are estimated to be 65dBA and 60dBA within 1,464 feet and 3,155 feet, respectively, of the centerline of the 210 Freeway according to General Plan Table V-6 At bwld-out, future noise levels are estimated to be 65dBA and 60dBA within 1,991 feet and 4,288 feet, respectively, of the centerline of the I-15 Freeway This estimated noise level exceeds the City Noise standard that specifies that exterior living areas shall not exceed 60dBA and the interior Irnng space shall not exceed 45dBA, between 7 00 a m to 10 00 p m Therefore, the following mitigation measures are regwred for the manager's apartment for the storage facility. • 1) A nose study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer prior to issuance of building permits The report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45dBA, the building materials and construction • techniques provided The interior nose standard is to be met with windows and doors closed. Therefore, ventilation is needed in order to provide a G , ~1 y~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 ~~ Sipurcem Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g va~wnY SioNawm wrtn Afuoeom m~ SiyvRam No i i ~ i i habitable environment. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the study. 2) The appllcent shall submit certification from the acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, Including measurements of Interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the manager's apartment. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-sde stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The residential tract to the west that is currently under construction includes a tall sound attenuation wall along the flood control channel The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 1702.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, H noise levels exceed tFe above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be regwred 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated G,K ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Then SOn~ficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ neatly p,ufiram wrtn nuaoenon men SiOnRCaM No I act Inco ed I act c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a) response above e) The sde is not located wthin an airport land use plan and is wthin 4 miles of a public airport Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and I businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) I b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental /acilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives Ior any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) L ~~ Gl~iy~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Lass Than SiBn~ficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~oN ear Mb nn peoon man sig~uficent No ~ Inm tetl ~ ~ d) Parks O O O (/) e) Other public facildies~ O O U (/) Comments: a) The site is located south of the 210 Freeway off-ramp which transitions into the I-15 on- ramp to the east To the south is vacant land which the applicant intends to develop as a future phase of the proposed protect (but is not part of this proposal). To the west of the site is a flood control channel, with single-family homes beyond The subtect site is vacant with an overall fall of 28 feet from north of the property to the south There is no significant vegetation on the site and no improvements The protect will not requve the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Bwlding and Fve Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are antiapated b) Additional police protection is not regwred as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Umon High School District. The protect will be regwred to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga The existing Etiwanda Creek Commundy park is located about 1 mile to the northwest of the protect site The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any eristing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public faalities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not requve the construction of any new facilties or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Pian FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a sigmficant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City ~-,,1~ y~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 ~~~ S,pnifirant Leis Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Foten4ally Sipn,ficant wml MNgaeon man &pnificem Na I Inca tetl I eal ect 14. RECREATION. Would the prolect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faaldies such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational faalities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Community Park, is about 1 mile northwest from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated i b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the prolect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle tops, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, ether indmdually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or h~ghways~ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with vit~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 t~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Lass rna~ Sipnlhcant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Pmenoatir siaMfioarn wen Abupeeon rna~ svam~~ No i inro gad i i the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is m an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of bwlding permds Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic arculation No impacts are anticipated. b) The protect will generate less than 250 two-way peak hour taps, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bemardmo Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwnng a traffic impact analysis The protect is m an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticpated c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is m an area that is mostly developed The protect will be regwred to provide sliest improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated. f) The protect design has adequate parking m compliance wdh standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect site is landlocked, hence, the proposed development will not conflict with alternative transportation goals ~_~ 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board () () () (/) b) Regwre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause s~gmficant environmental effects ~ G,~ s~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Leas men siWneem uee Issues and Supporting Information Sources svNe~i Mrogtlon Sipimil enl No I Inco as I I d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacty to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilties Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Qualdy Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distrct sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity The protect is requred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Oualdy Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram faalit~es, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Distract sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacty No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated r 1 L~ ~J ~(K sa Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 L _~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 less rnen Sipnifirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g `°'B1"'e"Y 9pNficent w"" Mrtipatlon ThOn Sipnificent No I eCY Into ted I 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limded, but cumulatively considerable ('Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection wdh the effects of past protects, the effects of other 1 current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ether directly or indirectly Comments• a) The ste is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along wth the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted Tor each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space Wth these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site with the proposed Specific Pian Amendment will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once GIN ~~ Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 construction actmties were completed impacts associated with the exposure measures contained in this Initial Stud levels EARLIER ANALYSES The Initial Study identified potentially significant of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation y will ensure impacts are at less than significant Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the followmg earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completmg this Initial Study and are available for review in the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certrfied October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certfied January 4, 1989) (/) Industnal Area Speahc Plan EIR (Certfied September 19, 1961) (/) Industnal Area Speafic Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) (~) Biological Assessment (Ecological Sciences, November 24, 2002) C~,, ~ s~ l._ J Initial Study for DRC2003-00047 & DRC2003-00048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I (have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have rewsed the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Prepared By ~ Date Z Pnnt Name and Title eJ` 8u~ub~'- ~/,~ ~ _~ ~.~, ~ ~s City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration ~s being arculated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Etnvanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Public Review Period Closes• April 14, 2004 Project Name. Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest comer of the 210 and I-1 freeway interchange-APN 0228-011-31 Project Description: A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to allow RV storage on the southwest parcel of 9 87 acres in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and to master plan and develop a RV storage facility on that site FINDING This is to advise that the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial St:idy identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required Reasons to support this fmdmg are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod ~A ril 14 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By ~,N~ RESOLUTION NO 04-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 TO ALLOW RECREATIONAL AND BOAT STORAGE ON 9 87 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0228-011-31 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph AssoGates filed an application for the approval of Etrvvanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047, as described m the title of this resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Etrvvanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of April 2004, the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concuded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 14, 2004, inducting written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The proposed amendment applies to properties located within the Low Residential District Hnthm the Etiwanda community, and b The proposed amendment wdl not a have a significant impact on the environment, and c The application is m contunction Huth a Conditional Use Permit application DRC2003-00048 to permit RV and boat storage on the subject site, and d The proposed amendment contemplates allowing RV and boat storage facilities Hnthm the Low Residential District 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and ~,, H s~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-43 DRC2003-00047 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 The subtect application is consistent Huth the obtectives of the Etrvvanda Specific Plan, and c The proposed amendment v~nll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity 4 Based upon the fads and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together Nnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the amendment Hell not have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vwth the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration Huth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect Hell have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Cal~fomia Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2004-00047 by the adoption of this Resolution recommending approval of the attached Ordinance by the Gty Council 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Macias, Chairman • `-'[ I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-43 DRC2003-00047 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, by the following vote-to-~nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS • G,~ ORDINANCE NO 04- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2003-00047 TO ALLOW A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY ON 9 87 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0228-011-31 A Recitals 1 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and recommended approval 2 On ,the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dunng the above- referenced public heanng on ,including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Counal hereby specifically finds as follows The application applies to property located within the City, and and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, c The applia3tion is in contunction with Conditional Use Perrnit to allow RV and boat storage on the subject site, and 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and . c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and ~t" CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 04- DRC2003-00047 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negatwe Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no Substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negatwe Declaration with regard to the application ~ b Although the Mitigated Negatwe Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negatwe Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negatwe Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves the amendment subject to the text change as listed below Parf ll Chapter 5, 5 22 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Add in the "L"Distract, 202 Other Uses Table, that "Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat Storage"is a conditionally permitted use with the following footnote "Recreational Vehicle (RV) and Boat Storage rs permitted subject to not being adjacent to single- famdy or multiple-family residences, and must be adjacent to both the 210 and I-15 freeways " 6 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, forany reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent . junsdiction, or preempted by legislatwe enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, ~I~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 04- DRC2003-00047 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. G,~ ~~~ RESOLUTION NO 044 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00048, FOR A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY ON 9 87 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0228-011-31 A Rectals 1 Charles Joseph AssoGates filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Perrnrt DRC2003-00048, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Condd~onal Use Perrmt request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 14th day of Apnl 2004, the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Parl A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 14, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together vwth public testimony, thu Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to vacant property at the southwest comer of the 210 and I-15 interchange, and b The vacant parcel has no mature trees on the site The site has a gentle north to south fall of 28 feet The 210 and I-15 interchange borders the site to the north and east To the south is vacant land and to the west is the Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel, and c The application is in contunction vhth Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 to allow an RV and boat storage on the subject sde, and d The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets or exceeds all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and Cam,, ~ ~"?-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed use is in accord vnth the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity, 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed MR~gated Negative Decaration, together wrath all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a sigmficent effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative DeGaretion and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Md~gated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEOA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative peGaretion vmth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of appro~~al c Pursuant io the prows~ons of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect well have potential for an adverse impact upon Hnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~Uon set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Dmsion 1) The landscape and imgation plans shall be subfed to Crty Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of pernits 2) The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, budding lighting fixtures (extenor), and parking lot Irghting fixtures 1~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES . Apnl 14, 2004 Page 3 Enaineenna Division 1) Regarding Etrvvanda/San Sevaine drainage policy, pnor to issuance of bwldmg pertmts, wntten confirmation shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract (SBCFCD) and a copy provided to the City, indicating that SBCFCD is permitting the developed unmitigated surface runoff from this site into their exsting fauhties 2) Caltrans and SBCFCD approvals well be regwred pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits 3) The pro/ect proposes to use channel fatalities and/or easements and existing access budges of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract (SBCFCD) The developer shall obtain and provide the Gty wrath wntten approval and conditions of approval from the SBCFCD pnor to obtaining budding permits Provide documented proof of nght of pnmary and secondary access as well as substantiating physical improvements over the proposed access points 4) Victona Street shall be v~ndened to provide full street improvements on the north side from the school d~stnct property line to the Caltrans nght- of-way, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and street pavement in accordance with City "Collector" street standards a) Provide streetlights on Victona Street as regwred b) The dive approach on Victona Street shall be per City Standard No 101, Type-C, minimum 35-feet vwde and comply vwth City policy c) The curb and dnve approach on Victona shall be placed at the ultimate curb alignment of 22-feet from the centerline of the street Dnve isle access entrance to Victona Street shall intersect at a nght angle Line of sight study shall be provided d) Provide R-26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs 5) Victona access to include a paved roadway 26 feet minimum width and meeting minimum Fire Department fuming radws regwrements from Victona Street entrance to the RV storage facilities a) Provide roadway and turn around between Victona Street and the storage faality to accommodate Fire vehicles and egwpment b) Provide adequate lighting 6) Fisher Dnve shall be widened in accordance with City "Collector" street standards including curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and street pavement G , ~ 1,;5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 4 a) Provide streetlights on Fisher Dnve as required b) The dnve approach on Fisher Dnve shall be per City Standard No 101, Type-C, minimum 35-feet mode and comply v~nth City Policy. c) The curb and dnve approach on Fisher Dnve shall be placed at the ultimate curb alignment of 22-feet from the centerline of the street, d) Fisher Dnve to include a tum around to accommodate Fire vehiGes and equipment e) Provide R-26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs 7) In the protect area designated "Phase II", complete all grading and drainage moth Phase I Environmental Mitigation Arr Qualify 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the wnstruction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading pemtits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and proleded equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planrnng Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the follomnng provisions . • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng C,N ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 5 Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibd~ty of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance moth local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City "rf silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year, of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , mood speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance Huth Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod stabd~zing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Air Quality Control Board [RAQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance vmth SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altematrve fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews moll shut off egwpment when not in use. 10) All industnal and commercial faulities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (~ e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parlung for vanpools 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conddioning, appliances and water heaters 13) All residential and commeroial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stopping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist C~ ~ ~ ~D~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 6 to momtor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wall • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their specaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological ' hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following ' appropnate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documerrting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wnthin the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report wrath onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (~ e , paleontological momtonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng ~s appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological momtor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found Hnthm an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the momtor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the momtor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoGated with G,~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 14, 2004 Page 7 vehicle traGung of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wend speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approvdd by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactwe construction areas that remain inactwe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration inGude Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, dwersions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Pnorto issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submrttothe City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wall be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Gurdel~nes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply wrath obtaining coverage underthe National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) A noise study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer prior to issuance of budding permits The report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45dBA, the budding materials and construction techniques provided The interior noise standard is to be met with windows and doors closed Therefore, ventilation is . needed in order to provide a habitable environment The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measure contained in the study C-~,1~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 8 2) The applicant shall submit certification from the acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implements in construction, inGuding measurements of intenor and extenor noise levels to document compliance vnth City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Budding & Safety Diwsion prior to final occupancy of the manager's apartment 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any Ume on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speGfied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Morntonng at othertimes may be regwred by the Plannng Division Said consultant shall report their findings to the Plannng Division wdhin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notifythe Planning Diwsion If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance wrath above noise standards or halted 5) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in • the first phase 6) Haul tuck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily traps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensdrve land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Richard Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary `-'I I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-44 DRC2003-00048 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 14, 2004 Page 9 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, doh reby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted f~y the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 14th day of Apnl 2004, try the follovwng vote-to-wtt. AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~l~ \\ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00048 and Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003-00047 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed prolect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the prolect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelmes. As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management - Th. MMP will be m place through all phases of the prolect. The prolect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The prolect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitgation measure identified m the Mtigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the prolect file with the department having the original authority for processing the prolect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~,,M ~~ C. J Mitigation Monitoring DRC2003-00047 and Page 2 Program DRC2003-00048 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needeb, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Fonn After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form 6. Unantiapated circumstances may apse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel " 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation actrvties at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits G,,N~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-00048 and DRC2003-00047 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Douglas Fenn Date: March 31, 2004 .. . - -. ... , Av Quality ~ ~ - , >, u.. , , ;~,~ . ~~ _.,.-s, , -t' ,., ~"r~~: ~- a•- ~-•~ ~.~s. ~aR, . - - ~ All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational 2/4 emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/CE C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures Imposed bythe SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rute 1108 - All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall mclude the foiiowing provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibtlity of large CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time y• • .. .. ... • - -. .. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Revew of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public During A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , gO/CE C Durin A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with g Rule 403 re uirements Construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils gO/CE C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A/C 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and the BO/CE C Durng A/C 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) shall Construction be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain - inactroefor 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wilt shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools - - - Alf residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 requved to incorporate high efiiciencyAow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters 2of7 JC, • • -. . .. Ail residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will - - retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will _ • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modrficatwn Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County - Archaeological Information Center for permanent archrom A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Rewew of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that wdl also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures s . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Revew of A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report mammal construction delay, to the site full-time dunn the interval of earth-disturbin actiwhes • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Revew of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notii the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods "`~' ~~~. '.:'s '' ~' x• '=""~'i~°~~ : ~ f ~ ,.f~";Y~~a i ~+ ==.~s:~__ - - ,k. r;x _4JY `.~#> ~:+}'3n .. _.. ah .,R~`w.f ~ yy a ~ 1 z'~nF'S L`ri The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction _ Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 4of7 ~~ .- -. .. . . Hydrology and Water Quality ~ ~~ ~ -. •r ~>u -~ - - ~-~ ~.~, ,~„ y.,.,, ~,~-e«r ~,:~. s .. - , ~ Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge - - - basins Prior to issuance of bwiding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water _ Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or pawng permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ,Noise; '+, , ~t A noise study shall be prepared by an acoustical CP C During A 4 engineer prior to issuance of bulding permits The construction report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45dBA, the building materials and construction techniques provided The interior noise standard is to be met with windows and doors closed Therefore, ventilation is needed in order to provide a habitable environment The bulding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the study • ~ i J' ~ ~ . . .. The applicant shall submit certification from the CP C During A 4 acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the construction acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the manager's apartment Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120•D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Seciion 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be requued by the Planning Dvision Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Droision within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced _ in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denotrng any _ _ construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, _ the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 of 7 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person 'Monhoring Frequency ~' ~ Method of Veriflcetlon ' ' "'~-' -~, _; ~ 4 /, Senetiotis .. - '' CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or designee B -Prior To Construction C -Throughout Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval C -Plan Check 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit 3 - W ilhhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E • Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Crtaflon _~ ~ ~ s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00048 SUBJECT: CROSSROADS R.V APPLICANT: BRUNO MANCINELLI C/O CHARGES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: HIGHWAY 210 AND THE I-15 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altemat~ve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe roquired oy a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligat,ons under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-44, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actmties and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on ftle in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan SC-1-04 1 ComoleUOn Date -/-/- ~-/_ / / / / i \plannmg\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc ~ t ~ ~\ Prgect No DHC2003-00048 Completion Date 2 Pnor to any use of the project site or business acbwty being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~ ~_/ 3 of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Balding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permts. 5. All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~ consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fast. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometnc diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and ~_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, ~~_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/~- 2 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/ area lighting fixtures, budding lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking jot lighting fixtures. E. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans • SC-1-04 2 G~~Z i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-OOO48cond4-14 doc t Protect No DRC2003-00048 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors ~F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a bwldmg, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2. All parkmg lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parkmg spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space en front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 OS 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3- A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-mch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwldmg 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Drnsion SC-1-04 3 Q ~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doe ~~ ~ (, Comolehon Date -/~_ _/~_ -~ ~_ _/_/ ~~ ~ ~~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/~ ~_~ -~-~- _~-~. ~-~_ Protect IJo DRC2003~0048 Comole6on Date 10 Landscaping and vrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined In Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/~ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requue separate application and approval by the Planning Dwision prior to Installation of any signs. I. Environmental , 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit,, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner In the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertornance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Clty to retain consukants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~~_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval prior to the Issuance of budding permrs FOR 10 , APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-27 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five comNlete sets of plans incuding the following ~~ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans SC-1-04 4 G ~ ~~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc 1 Protect No DRC2003-00048 Completion Date 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ . Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~ ~~_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy Issued bythe _/~_ Budding and Safety Diwsion , L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approveii pnor to construction All plans shall be ~___/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or ~~_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permits issuance ~ 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map ~~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public ~~_ counter) 6 The following is regwred for side yard use for increase to allowable area _/ /_ a Provide a reduced site plan (8 Yz" x 11 "), which indicates the non-buildable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Bwldable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provde compliance wdh the Califomia Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Roofing materials shall be Class "A " _/_/_ 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc 5 C\~ Prgect No DRC2003-00048 Comolehon Dete Upon tenant Improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed N. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with Calrfomla Building Code, Clty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calrfomla to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a quallfled engineer or geologist and submtted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Calrfomla registered Civil Engineer- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 66 total feet on Fisher Drive P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equiprnent which is regulated bytechnicai codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Islantl Bike Trail Other Victoria Street X X X X X X (e) Fisher Drive X X X X X X Notes (e) Bike lane In pavement ~-~- ~~- ~_~_ ~~. ~~. ~~ -/~~ _~~ ~~- / / C~ SC-1-04 6 ~~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc -1 1 ~ ` Project No DRC2003-00048 Comolehon Date Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and uotersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addi4on to any other permits required , , c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro/ect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect winng Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless othennnse specfed by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requved A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated arainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Victoria Street Fisher Drive TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAN CHECK SC-1-04 i tplanning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc ~,~ ~~ -/-/- / / -/-/- / / / I -/-/- I / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2003-00048 Comolehon Date Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Ctty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficienaes may regwre backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraai or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 7 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right of-way I-15 and _/_/_ Highway 210 Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made far acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _I_/_ property from ad/scent areas 2 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is requred for work within its _/_/_ right-of-way S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be sub/ect to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_I_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved SC•1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc ~,~ ~~ Protect No DRC2003-00048 ComoleUOn Date 2 Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffiaent improvement plans shall be completed • beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the submittal to Planning Division Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days,following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo censored cell All bwldmgs shall'have mammal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures ~V. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fenang and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 W. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted from frame or track in any manner APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 / I / I I / / / / / -/-/- I / ' ~ ~ (.>~ i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2003-00048cond4-14 doc FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION RCFPD Standard Conditions PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): DRC2003-00048 Crossroads RV 7 Technical Review Varies, not specified on plans Assumed 39,601 sq ft TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type ASSUrnIriQ V-N FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED Sprnklers in all buddmgs LOCATION: I-15 and I-210 ' FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazl, Sr Plans Examiner PLANNER: Dou~q Fenn, .,~,,,,,.,~,,,,,.,.,.,~,~,~,,,.,.,.,,,.. ,,,,,,,~,,,~,~,,,.~,,,~,~ti,~,~,~,~,~N,,,~,,,,,~,,,..,~,~,.~,.,~,.,~„~,,,.~,~,.,,-,~~..,T__., THE FOLLOWING ARE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS THAT APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT A. Water Supply for fire fighting must be extended to the site regardless If the building are constructed. Water Report received 1 Minimum Fire Flow: The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 5500aallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards 2 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this protect is 2750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire District Ordinances and Standards B. Fire District Access Issues must Be Addressed Immediately The protect will not be permitted to be bwlt unless all the following issues are resolved • Public way to access the site • Load capabilities of the proposed use of budges must be proven to support 80,000GVW • On-site Fue lanes need be 26' wide extending from the public roadway • Provide a recorded reciprocal access agreement between the property owner and San Bernardino County Flood Control for site access and emergency access using the flood control access roads and bud es • C~ 1 Private Roadways and Fire l-anes• The minimum specfications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The inside tum radius shall be 24-feet c The outside tum radws shall be not less than 46-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surtace shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS The following Standard Conditions apply to the above project. FSC-1 General Reqwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacng and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants' a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet 2 Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this prolect is 5500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification of fire flow availability for the propcsed protect Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3 Minimum Fire Flow with Automatic Fire Sprinklers: The required minimum fire flow for this prolect is 2750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50 percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system with central station monitoring This requrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended, and Fire Distract Ordinances and Standards 4 Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1 Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight Contact the Fve Safety Droision (909) 477-2770 2 Number of Fire Hydrants Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion (909) 477-2770 3 Fire Sprinkler Underground. Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval Contact the Fve Safety Division (909) 477-2770 ~ ~\ FSC-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1 Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code I standard, requires an approved automatic fve sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following a Commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet b All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (See Fire Access) c When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate flow or pressure F$C-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1 Access Roadways Defined: Fue District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes 2 Location of Access: All portions of the structure or facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the fvst story shall be located within f 50-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwidmg Landscaped areas, unpaved changes rn elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 3 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes: The minimum speafications for private fire district access roadways are a The minimum unotutructed width is 26-feet ~ b The inside tum radius shall be 24-feet ~ c The outside tum radds shall be not less than 46-feet d The mirnmum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surtace shall not exceed t2% i Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 4 Fire Lane Identffication• All regwred fire lanes shall be identitied by red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fve Lanes standard FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or budding construction As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) the applicant must contact the Fire Safety Division for specific rnformation Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Italicized text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property ~~ ~~ 2 Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capaaty) On a scaled site plan show the occupancy or use of all butldings within a Y: mde radius Storage exceeding 100 gallons aggregate capacity ~s not permitted within Yz mde of residential areas FSC-12 Plan Submittal Requved Notice Regwred plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction in accordance with 2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 2001 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSG14 Altemate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Dwision will review requests for aitemate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Altemate Method" form along with supporting documents PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Private/On-site Flre Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the prwate water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Dwision for a copy of "Fve District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation. All private on-site fve hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion 3 Public Fire Hydrants• Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect 4 Public Installation: All required public fve hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delwering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Diwsion Contact Water District to schedule testing PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflectwe pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On prwate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 2 Fire Sprinkler System- Plans and Permit Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 ~,N ~ 3 Fire Sprnnkler System- Final Inspection: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 4 Sprinkler Monitonng The fire sprinkler system momtonng system~shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupanae~ Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 5 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submdted pnor to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Dmsion for specrfic details and ordenng information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 6 Fire Lanes: Pnor to the issuance of any Certrficatg of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance wdh the approved fve lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain an approved fire lane map and provisions that prohibil parking in the fue lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CCBR's shall also ~dentrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes Contact Bwlding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713. 7 Address- Other Than Single-fatuity: New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address wrfh minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated during penods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an addrfional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Contact Budding and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 8 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fire Safety Dwision This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property Contact Frre Safety Division (909) 477-2770 ~~ CJ ~,,~ ~a T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE Apnl 14, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner SUBJECT DISCUSSION OF ROOFING ORDINANCE -WILLIAM TRUDEAU - A request to change the City's Roofing Ordinance to allow homeowners the opportunity to choose between multiple types of roofing products, Including but not limited to, changing existing file roofs to composition shingle BACKGROUND Mr Trudeau first raised his request to the Planning Division In early 2003 Staff was not supportive of his specific request to re-roof his house at 6275 Celestite Avenue to composition shingle It was explained to Mr Trudeau that he would have to replace his roof with tile, the same matenal that was approved with his home when It was first approved by the City He requested the opportunity to present his request and tustification to the Planning Commission, and on May 14, 2003, the Planning Commission hosted a workshop with Mr Trudeau The Commission did not support his request to re-roof his home with composition shingles On March 3, 2004, Mr Trudeau presented his Issue to the Clty Council The Clty Council has referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation DISCUSSION Tonight the Planning Commisslon Is asked to review Mr Trudeau's request and consider whether a change to our Development Code to modify the City's roofing standards Is warranted The City's General Plan states "Rancho Cucamonga Is one of a handful of cities In Southern Callfomia known for the consistently high quality of our streetscapes and adtacent development " From the very Inception of Incorporation, the Clty has kept a careful eye on the aesthetics of our community The General Plan Is supported and Implemented through the Development Code The Development Code was last amended In 2001 and it specifically addressed the Issue of composition shingles as a matenal for roofing consideration It states that for roofing, use matenal made of tile, slate, copper, or the Imitation thereof, but not Including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual quality of the structure The visual quality of our community Is a hallmark The requirement for file roofs began In the 1980s and was made a standard for all new protects In 1987 The matority of our housing stock In the Clty has been built with file roofs A change to allow composition shingles for re-roofing of existing tiled roofs or new protects would have a drastic impact on our established neighborhoods f1EM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DISCUSSION OF ROOFING ORDINANCE -WILLIAM TRUDEAU Apnl 14, 2004 Page 2 The file roof industry already offers an extremely wide range of choices in styles, color, and fabncation It is staffs strong opinion that a change to the Code to allow the use of composition shingles as requested would not enhance the quality of our community, but would in fact lower the quality standards of our City COMMUNICATIONS Mr Trudeau submitted the attached petition (Exhibit B) to the City Counal at ds March 3, 2004, heanng Mr Trudeau's request can have an effect on his immediate neighborhood including those that signed the petition, therefore, staff sent notice of this meeting to the neighborhood Staff received a letter from former Mayor Dennis Stout opposing a change to the Roofing Ordinance (Exhibit E) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider Mr Trudeau's tustification for change, take public testimony, and direct staff to prepare a recommendation to the City Counal Staff would strongly recommend that an amendment to the Code not be supported Respectful) submitted, ~~ Brad Buller City Planner BB gs Attachments Exhibit "A" - Letter from William Trudeau dated January 1, 2004 Exhibit "B" - Petition for Roofing Ordinance submitted March 3, 2004 Exhibit "C" - Development Code Excerpts Exhibit "D" - Roofing Information Handout Exhibit "E" - Letter from Dennis Stout dated March 17, 2004 r1 L. J r1 ~.._J LZ January 1,2004 My name is William Trudesu a resident in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. I've asked to speak at the next city comrcil meeting regarding the cities roofing ordinance. On Apri117, 2003 I made a written request to speak at a planning commission meeting regarding the cities roofing ordinance. The requested change that I put forward to the committee was to allow the homeowner the opportunity to Seely choose between muhiple types of roofing products. The city ordinance as it stabes, mabeates that a home with a file roof in need of replacement must be replaced with tile. Homes with composition or wood shake may be replaced with either composition or tile. Ia my meeting with the planning commission I addressed four areas of comparison: 1. Fire rating, 2. Wind rating, 3. Walk ability, 4. Aesthetical comparison. 1. The fire rating of both file and composition roofs are both rated as a class A fire rated product. 2. The wind rating was essentially the same for both products. 3. The walk ability comparison was done to illuminate the problems with tile. First the file manufacture does not Dover broken file from being walked on. Homeowners on occasion may need to perform maintenance such as cleaning out chimneys, as well as valley flesh?ngs that accumulate tree litter; file roofs utilize the tarpaper beneath to shed the water. This paper deteriorates abe creates a leak from the accumulation of leaf litter. Standard weight file is less likely to break from walking however light weight file is almost sure to break. Common maintence would cause a homeowner to replace file at his own expense. Last but not least we saw firefighter through out our community protecting structures from advancing wild fires last year. Typical structrae protection places fire fighters on roofs in order to save homes. As a firefighter I know composition roofs are much safer to work on. Composition is not as slippery as file when wet abe with file I pose a risk of breaking the ties oa the roof, thus damaging the very strucnae I'm there to protect. The composition and the file roofs are both Class A fire rated materials as well. 4. Aesthetical comparison is the reason the city has the curnm roofing ordinance. The planning committee has made it very clear that many years ago they were directed by past councils to write a roofing ordinance that prevented composition roofs within the city. This was because the past councils felt that composition roofs were an aesthetically downgraded material from tile. I had met with Brad Buller prior to my meeting with the commission and knew this was the area I must debate. I fast showed that composition products have made huge strides m mzproving the beauty of their product line over the last 15 years. I provided a detailed list of homes in very affluent communities such as Laguna Beach, Brentwood, Arcadia and Laverne. These community's home values are not suffering from the diversity of roofing products. In some cases these homeowners ~~ csin afford to ra-roof with any product on the market and they still chose composition. In some cases the composition products are much more expensive than standard tile. The planning commission has made a strong stand against composition roofs based solely on their opinion that they are not equal in beauty to tile. They have made allowances for owners with wood shake, or composition to re-roof with the option of file or composition, how can that be if composition is unacceptable based on its lack of beauty. This is clearly disparate treatme~ fior those with file looking to re-roof with composition. Brad Buller asked if I courld provide a way to change the current roofing code, that would allow for high e~ 50 yr composition roof and yet preve~ the lower end 20-30yr less desirable types of composition roofs i~o the city. This could be accomplished by stating a minimum weight of 4501bs per square along with s dimensional appearance would accomplish this request. This language change was presented to Brad with no change in the status of my appeal My ebe resort was that I have presented a strong argument for change however the commission, by direction of the council, retains the ability to dictate through this type of code what leaks good on my home. I have included samples of roofing products as well as composition roof brochures and a list of hoares that are roofed with composition products; however the real question I seek an answer to is the question of freedom of choice? John F. Kennedy once wrote;" The unity of freedom has never relied on the uniformity of opinion." The leaders of our country and our communities must remember that freedom of choice is the foundation on which this country was buih. I also realize that governing a city means that a council must govern against one mans freedom of choice negatively impacting his neighbor's safety or property value, which composition roofs have no negative impact. The governing of aesthetics between high quality products is in poor judgment. I honestly feel that a simple roofing ordinance h'ke the one in place as well as the inability of the planning committee to see the obvious injunction of every man's unalienable right to the freedom of choice makes me wonder if this is still America. Under a government that can arbitrarily decide what is aesthetically beautiful for my home and what is not, we will no longer live in the land of the free. Do we not celebrate the 4m of July every year and remember how many lives have been given for a couctry that believes in freedom? Would the city of Rancho Cucamonga honestly deny a veteran of our armed services the freedom of choice, when his sacrifice provides the blanket of security we all have come to appreciate? I have also included a copy of the Declaration of Independence for inspiration as well as a reminder of what makes this country so great. Sincerely, William Trudeau i ~a c~ ~e~~ y~~ ~~Z Petition for roofing ordinance naK U 4 2004 ~' 3~5~ P/Ps9~~1~'H ~Z~z ~~~ c~~cn~ ~-~(~_~~: The current roofing ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga restricts the feedom of choice for some home owners. Residems with file roofs are not allowed to update their homes with certain roofing products. Home owners with shake or composition shingle roofs are allowed more options when choosing roofing products. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt a more open minded ordinance. All home owners should be regulated by the same standards, giving every residem equal freedom to choose. We have met with the Planning Commission as well as Mayor Bill Alexander to discuss this issue. This topic will be on the agenda for a council meeting in Febnauy. We are asking the city to grant home owners the freedom to choose what looks best on their houses while tbe city retains the ability to restrict products based on fire safety and maintaining neighborhood home values. Please support feedom of choice in our community. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE U ti.~ Sf ~N qN ~'~l ~o R ~y ,~,1 /0355~~ ~~ruuhrar ~ a / i /1iI iY/Z~-~ L.or,~, b l 2 IB~~Sf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfv10NGA nr'' _ ..,~~ING Liz. UF~FSY~T"~ la.~~~ L.~a-,v,Z (0 2S2 -t.r/os / ~ ~' ~~1 I • Petition for roofing ordinance . The current roofing ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga restricts the freedom of choice for some home owners. Residents with file roofs are not allowed to update their homes with certain roofing products. Home owners with shake or composition shingle roofs are allowed more options when choosing roofing products. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt a more open minded ordinance. All home owners should be regulated by the same standards, giving every resident equal freedom to choose. We have met with the Planning Commission as well as Mayor Bill Alexander to discuss this issue. This topic will be on the age~a for a council meeting in February. We are asking the city to grant home owners the freedom to choose what looks best on their houses while the city retains the ability to restrict products based on fire safety and maintaining neighborhood home values. Please support freedom of choice in our community. NAME ADDRESS ,SIGNATURE i ass i~l ~ ~OJ~/.~(%` ~a~ 5 ce~es7rr-ems ~,~~u 30 ~~r_rrrTr. ~-~Q CAD ~~~~,z Petition for rooSng ordinance The currem roofing ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga restricts the fieedom of choice for sow home owners. Residents with file roofs are not allowed to update their homes with certain roofing products. Home owners with shake or composition shingle roofs are allowed more options when choosing roofing products. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt a more open minded ordinance. All home owners should be regulated by the same standards, giving every resident equal freedom to choose. We have met with the Planning Commission as well as Mayor Bill Alexander to discuss this issue. This topic will be on the agenda for a council meeting in February. We are asking the city to grant home owners the freedom to choose what looks best on tbeir houses while the city retains the ability to restrict products based on fire safety abe maintaining neighborhood home values. Please support freedom of choice in our community. 1-`llu i ~ ADDRESS SIGNATURE Sc%Si~.~~ l~L~f/~t~)/)~/i S ~7~7 /V ~7~.1L4~.. ~•.~ i~i,'z ~y~,i.t2~~ ~~ ~~ Petition for roofing ordinance The current roofing ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga restricts the freedom of choice for some home owners. Residents with the roofs are not allowed to update their homes with certain roofing products. Home owners with shake or composition shingle roofs are allowed more options when choosing roofing products. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt a more open minded ordinance. All home owners should be regulated by the same standards, giving every resident equal freedom to choose. We have met with the Planning Commission as well as Mayor Bill Alexander to discuss this issue. 'Ibis topic will be on the agenda for a council meeting in February. We are asking the city to grant home owners the freedom to choose what looks best on their houses while the city retains the ability to restrict products based on fue safety and maintaining neighborhood home values. Please support freedom of choice in our community. v ~'s~~Ot- /C'HoEiUiN~' ~~ 3 8~ Tas P P~ 1 ~ .~~/y J ~~ NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Petition for roofing ordinance The current roofing ordinance in Rancho Cucamonga restricts the freedom of choice for some home owners. Residents with file roofs are not allowed to update their homes with certain roofing products. Home owners with shake or composition shingle roofs are allowed more options when choosing roofing products. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt a more open minded ordinance. All home owners should be regulated by the same standards, giving every resident equal freedom to choose. We have met with the Planning Comm;~~ion as well as Mayor Bill Alexander to discuss this issue. This topic will be on the agenda for a council meeting in February. We are asking the city to grarrt home owners the freedom to choose what looks best on their houses while the city retains the ability to restrict products based on fire safety and maintaining neighborhood home values. Please support freedom of choice in our community. ~~ NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Rancho Cucamonga Develonment Code Section 17 08 090 Air Quality Management District or the regwrements of any Av Quality Plan adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga K Fire and Explosion Hazards An operation or activity involving the storage of flammable or explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of fue and explosion and adequate fve fighting and fve suppression equipment and devices in accordance with the regwrements of the Foothill Fve District Unrform Bwlding Code, and Unrform Fve Code. Burning of waste materials in open fire is prohibited at any point. L Fissionable or Radioactive Materials No operation or activities shall be permitted which result at any time in the release or emission of any fissionable or radioactive materials into the atmosphere, the ground, or sewerage systems M Liquid or Solid Waste. • No operabon or action shall discharge at any point into any public street, public sewer, private sewage disposal system, stream, body of water, or into the ground of any materials of such nature or temperature as can contaminate any water supply, interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment, or otherwise cause the emission of dangerous or offensive elements, except in accord with standards approved by the Calrfomia Department of Public Health or such other governmental agency as shall have lunsdiction. Section 17.08.090 -General Design Guidelines A Intent The intent of the guidelines is to assist the developer in understanding and complying with the City's standards for bwlding and site design The gwdelines are based upon community design goals as expressed in the General Plan, and encourage the orderly and harmornous appearance of structures and property along with assoaated faalities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets The gwdelines establish a high standard for design quality but are flexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions B Applicability The provisions of this section shall apply to all development wrthtn all residential distracts, unless otherwise specrfied herein Any addition, remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a budding permit within any residential district subfect to DevelopmenUDesign Review pursuant to Chapter 1706 shall adhere to these guidelines where applicable. C Site Plan Design 1 Existing Srte Conditions Natural features should be used to an advantage as design elements, such as, mature vegetation, landforms, drainage courses, grading, rock outcroppings, and views Conversely, undesirable site features can be minimized through proper site planning and bwlding orientation 2 Bwlding Orientation Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings The setback from streets and adfacent properties should relate to the scale of the proposed building Larger buildings require more setback area for a balance of scale and compatibility with adjacent uses Buildings should be oriented along anorth-south axis, as much as possible, to encourage energy conservation For multi-family development, attached dwellings should be provided with relief and a sense of variety This could be achieved by staggering the units The placement of buildings should relate to one another and create a variety of view orientation for increased interest and openness This could be achieved by skewing or angling the buildings Buldngs should be clustered around common facilities L\O 7 08-44 Rancho CucamonPa Develoomenr Code Secaon 17 08 090 r. Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adfacent lots s. Integrate screens for all roof-mounted egwpment into the building design (i e , extend parapet walls) rather than as an afterthought t Design roof line in confunct~on with building mass for consistent composition u. On hillsides, design the form, mass, and profile of buldings and architectural features so as to compliment the natural topography v. Use native rock for fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products. w Design chimneystacks with accent materials used on the house, such as bock or stone, except on interior chimneys x. Use roofing material made of ble, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shmales• that will upgrade the character and the casual quality of the structure 3 Scale The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale Multiple tamAy product type (i e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adfacent to lower density single-family areas All attached protects adfacent to existing one-story single-family developments shall be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, wows, and general compatibility Bwldings should emphas¢e horizontal as well as vertical appearance This could be achieved by the use of protections or recessions of stones, balconies, windows and doors, and changes in roof levels and planes In particular for multiple family product type, buildings over three stones should consider stepping back. Materials and Colors Colors, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design The materials and colors chosen should complement the bwldmg character and enhance the casual quality Si rim Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing Provisions for sign placement, sign scale in relationship with building, and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept While providing the most effective signing, rt shall also be highly compatible with the bwldmg and site design relative to color, material, and placement Ecuioment Screemn~tc Any egwpment, whether on the roof, side of bwldmg, or ground, shall be screened The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible in terms of material, color, shape, and size The screening design shall blend with the building design Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable L~\ t 7 oa-ss vot ROOFING INFORMATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Planning Division Telephone (909) 477-2750 Building and Safety Telephone (909) 477-2710 c The following are some of the most frequently asked questions by homeowners regarding roofs. We hope this answers most of your questions. Should you need additional infonnation, please feel free to talk to our staff at the Building and Safety and Planning Counters, or phone us at the numbers listed above. Why is k Important to be informed about roofing in Rancho Cucamonga? Because of the seven: winds native to the Rancho Cucamonga area, and to maintain or improve the quality of roofing, the following irtfonnation is important and applies to all new and replacement roofs. What approvals from Rancho Cucamonga do I need when re-roofing my home? All re-roofing protects requinng a permit, must be approved by the Budding and Safety, Planning, and Engineenng Divisions. What are the roofing requirements? 1. All roofs shall be installed per the manufacturers high wind resistant specifications and the appropnate application tables contained within the most recently adopted California Budding Code (Tables 15-B-1 asphalt shingle, 15-D-1 all tiles, and 15-D-2 interlocking Ule Hnth protecting anchor lugs) 2. All new roofs shall be installed over solid sheathing. a) AsahaR Comaosition: Asphalt composition roofs are to be anchored with a minimum of 6 fasteners per shingle. Fasteners are to be long enough to penetrate into the roof sheathing a minimum of/+" or through the thickness of the sheathing whichever is less b) Tlle: The heads of all tiles shall be Waded. The noses of all eave course tiles shall be fastened with approved Gips. All rake tiles shall be Waded with two Wads, and the noses of all ndge, hip, and rake tiles shall be set in a bead of approved roofer's mastic. In addition, battens shall be provided when required by manufacturer's specifications or Table 15-D-2 (separate inspection required). Fasteners shall be long enough to penetrate into the roof sheathing aminimum of/+" or through the thickness of the sheathing, whichever is less. What about inspections? Inspections are required. For inspectior, purposes, a sturdy ladder and the inspection card must be present at the time of the inspection Packaging from the roofing matenal, along with the manufacturer's high wind resistant installation specifications, shall be made available to the inspector. The inspector will verify nailing and fastener penetration at all areas including eaves. Do not cover any portion until approved to do so by the inspector. Do I have to use special nails or fasteners and how should they be spaced? Roof sheathing shall be secured to the roof structure using 8d common or 6d deformed shank or common nails These fasteners shall be spaced at 6" on center at all panel edges and at 12" on center throughout the remainder of the panel • ~\'>/ Page 1 of 2 ~.LVLIVL~ ..i7Y OF RANCHU CGCwviu~. ADMIN15TRATION . MAR 17 2004 Mazch 17, 2004 4 ~n ~ ~ ~?.t.2.3,4.~ Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council 10500 Crv~c Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 . Honorable Mayor and Members of the Counc~l• I am wntmg this letter to urge that you deny Mr. Tntdeau's appeal Whte I beheve that mdrndual tights are tmportant, I also beheve that when we choose to live m a city we also have a respons~b~l~ty to our neighbors Each city is unique m what ~s important to its residents Many residents select a city based on what they beheve are its values They have an expectation that then city will maintarn those values For the past twenty years this city has required file roofing matenal on res~denrial development The reason for this was to promote an image of quality Quality ~s a value that I think ~s universally accepted here Because quality became a core value of Rancho Cucamonga, the city became a pioneer m the azea of quality design The city created the design review process to insure that quality was a mayor cons~derahon m all development At the lime the city made the • dec~s~on to require file roofing matenal it was embarking on a hard fought battle to establish the city as the leader in this county on issues of quality While stating that you beheve m quality is important, your actions are far more important I think rt ~s important that the leaderslup m the city make decisions that are consistent with the qty's values It sends the cleaz message that you beheve quality ~s important The fact that a few residents believe that compos~t~on roofing matenal is of equal or higher quality than rile ~s simply contrary to what most residents beheve The norion that there are vanous levels of quality m composition roofing and that you could require only the higher-end composition roofing presents an addmonal problem There ~s simply no legal way of defining this It would be would be totally unenforceable The I~ne between file and compostt~on roofing matenals ~s the fairest and easiest for all to understand In this specific case, the fact that all of [he other houses m the neighborhood aze file also is problematic Has the city notified all of the other residents and received their feed back? I would hope that the first time they hear about this is not the morning the new roofing is installed If file roofing is as dangerous and breakable as was asserted, then why haven't there been large numbers of residents compla~mng about the problems If the council were to allow this appeal for that reason, ~t would certainly be mcons~stent with requmng rt on new development There dust isn't any evidence that file ~s more dangerous than any roofing matenal L J \~ Rancho Cucamonga has been an example for many of the c~Ues around here on design issues The city should stnve to keep that leadership role. Standazds should be . constantly razsed not lowered. Granting this appeal would be a mayor step backward. Dom,.;,, L Si«.X 8104 Gazdema Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ~J n U ~~a April 10, 2004 Members of the Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Members of the Planning Commission. I am writing this letter to highlight the key points I would like to address regarding the upcoming Planning Commission meeting. A copy of the staff report from Brad Buller as well as a letter from Mr Stout a former Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga was sent to myself as well as to all of you. Ttus letter serves as an outline to the points I would respectfully address the night ofthe meeting. I agree with everyone from Brad Buller to Dennis Stout, that this is an exceptional community to live in and would give credit to the people such as the Planning Department/ Commission and the past and present city council for the aesthetical quality of the city. The very question that is up for debate is surrounding the image of quality. Do Composition roofs affect the image of quality as viewed by society? • Why has no other City along the foothill communities from Arcadia to Rancho Cucamonga restricted homeowners with file roofs the option to replace their roof with a high quality/lifetirrie guazanteed composition product? • I walked door to door in my neighborhood and was able to survey the majority of my neighbor's opinion regarding my choice to replace my roof with a high quality composition product I shazed brochures and pictures illustrating the product to everyone. The majority of my neighbors supports my choice and do not view the product as a downgraded product from tile. • Some may azgue that by allowing me to re-roof with composition would create a change in the feel of the neighborhood, however homeowners in a street that is all composiUOn can become different as well by selecting file as their replacement product. • The cities development code, which does not allow composition-roofing materials, was adopted to promote an unage of quality Why then has the city allowed hundreds of composition re-roofing permits a yeaz for many yeazs~ Are these homeowners m dvect violation of lowering the image of quality in the city? Why would some very well respected individuals on our curent city council lower the city standazds of quality in then neighborhoods by re-roofing with composition and yet have the people of this community elect them to office? ~ T~f-i L When suggesting that the city amend the development code to allow for premium quality composition roofing products as a replacement product for any roof. I was told that rt would be hard to define • The automotive industry has many manufactures of cars. Almost all manufactures of automobiles have different levels of quality. Toyota makes many lower paced cazs and yet also retains some very high end product lines that aze comparable to Mercedes or BMW By labeling all Toyota products as promoting a lower image of quality would become a very biased statemerrt • Roofing products aze just the same as the automotive industry. Almost all your standard weight file is less expensive than all of the Prermum Composrt~on products The lower end composition product usually has a15 yr warranty and aze fighter in weight than the tugh end 50 yr or lifetune warranty products. • The city could easily amend its code to allow only the high quality composition products available to any homeowner by setting a minimum weight limit per square as well as providing a shadowing effect. This change alone would allow equal protection under the law, which is currently questionable. Due to the fact that the current development code specifically states, "Roofing materials shall not include composition shingle". (17.08 090 letter }~. Is there equal protection under the ]aw when the city allows certain homeowners hundreds of re-roofing permits a year, against such a specific development code? Are file roofs more problematic than composition roofs? • The roofing compames that have come out and given me bid to replace my roof have all stated that of all the types of roofing products a composition roof is the type of roof that the have the least amount of problems with • Tile roofs utd~ze the taz paper to shed the water not the tile. The file may be a Lfetune product if not walked on, however it is the paper that fails. • Most of the people on my street have all kinds of leaks ranging from small to large These are homes that after 15 yeazs the roofs began to fail. Although they look mce they are not holding up as well as an inexpensive composition roof Why after 15 years of buying a new home would a homeowner want to use the same type ofproduct after it failed prematurely • Anytime someone walks on your file roof they risk breaking file and causing leaks There aze not any file manufactures that wan•anty their product if you walk on your roof • As a Firefighter I know that file is very easy to slip on when wet and working on file roofs in fire conditions is much more dangerous Mr. Stout as well as Mr Buller have expressed that any composition product would lower the quality of the city The west side of the city where 1 live, West of Carnelian And South of Banyan has a lot of homes with composrt~on roofs. However this part of town is very desirable to live m and I would feel very out of line telling those neighbors with compositwn roofs that their homes are m fact lowering the quality of the community. I respectfully appreciate the options of Mr Buller and Mr Stout The fact remains that Premium composition roof product are allowed already in this community as well as surrounding commumUes with all types of homes ranging up to million dollars homes m very exclusive communities. They provide homeowners with a beautiful class A fue rated, walkable roof that will stand up for more yeazs than file roofs and although more expensive than standazd file roofs they will save money m the long run Cities have a duty to wnte codes that prevent unsafe as well as products that lower home values from coming into the city. The people m trusted to set up these codes should not let personal opinion selectively lirrut people's freedom of choice We all have a responsibility to our neighbors to maintain a quality look and allow each other to express their freedom of choke. Freedom is what makes this country so great Respectfully, ~ ~ tee'-" William Trudeau ~~ N" 8 J ~ a~~ Y .i 4'~i;~ t ¢ . ~ c~°`I r ` ~ ` _ ~ r Y 6~ _ ~ ~~T. ~i i h C y ,l-/ Y`' fir-] T ~ t ~ .~~ Rr ~a~•r~1 :: ~~~ ~., a ~~ ~~ }` 4~ ~ }~ P R .a-a9 {;1 y'~j Yi 41 [ ~• ,_ ~„~ z - ~~ ~ ~ ;y 'a, ~~~ti <~Y ~~r ((il~ ti V ~I~ ~v ~ k{ ~6 1~ ~ 7 Y Y S ~~ i i ii { 1 ~~k _dA G V t~ V ~L V r- l~ 4- ~l c~~ ,~ -~- I~M- ~~ April 13, 2004 Brad Buller City Planner Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Mr Buller, I am writing in regard to the letter I received pertazmng to Mr William Trudeau and his interest in changing lus roof covering from the to composition At present, the city does not allow residents or contractors to change file roofing to any other material This policy is truly in the best interest of our citizens m maintaining a desired look m the city Having building standards and codes maintains umformity and keeps this city a quality place to live If we allowed anyone to choose building designs, roofing material and bizarre colors of their homes, we would have numerous vaziations of the like A the roof gives a home a beauty of its own and increases the value of the home This is why file roofing came into existence years ago It seems that ins stance on changing the material does not make complete sense since he is concerned about leaks that are present I am a contractor and realize that the cost to fix the areas that aze leaking is far less than the cost of removing the file roof and replacing it with a composition material Not to mention the replacement costs in the coming years when the roof deteriorates from exposure to the elements Not only will changing lus roofing material lower the value of his own home, it will lower the value of the surrounding homes that have worked so hard to make their home as beautiful as possible Mr Trudeau also states that he is a fireman and is concerned that there is a slipping hazard when working on a the roof Unfortunately, he has already forgotten about the recent Grand Pnx Fire that burned over the entire interface of the Rancho Cucamonga area and came down dust azound his home During this horrendous fire, ashes and brands were Gamed miles away, which could land on combustible roofing materials Fortunately, his home had a file roof at the time and prevented any flying branding from potentially catching his own home on fire I am also a firefighter and understand what we term "structure triage" during Wildland Firefighting During these situations we look at the structure and determine if it is "Defendable" or "Non-Defendable" The criteria that we use include type of construction, roofing material, clearance around the homes and area topography Tile roofing is a sigmficant advantage in protecting homes during these times In the Grand Prix Fire, we would have lost significantly more homes if the roofs were covered with wood shake or composition roofing material 1 je~~~ L I hope that you and your staff take these maters into consideration when making your final decision I am sure you will also consider the impact tlus will have if a change is allowed This could set a precedent that will have ramifications extending through the city When one homeowner ~s allowed this change, many more will Ime up for the same consideration, leading to a substantial decrease m overall property value to the entue city Sincerely, Ron and Terri Seymour 6249 Marble Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701