Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004/09/08 - Agenda PacketSEPTEMBER 8, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A ends 2 - 6 A - B Development Review DRC2004-00276 7 - 87 Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT16726 C Environmental Assessment for Metrolink 88 - 167 Railroad /Haven Avenue Underpass -City of Rancho Cucamon a D Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-00243 168 - 193 E Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT16972-1 194 - 208 F, G, I Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 209 - 313 Map SUBTT16769 Variance DRC2001-00155 Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2001-00154 H, J Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel 314 - 426 Map SUBTPM16507 Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2004-00109 r~ lJ r~ L_J THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA GUCAMONGA September 8, 2004 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias _ Vice Chairman McNiel _ Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 14, 2004 July 14, 2004, Adjourned July 17, 2004, Adjourned August 11, 2004 August 11, 2004, Adjourned IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 8, 2004 RANCHO CucAMONGA Z A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 15single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Tentatwe Tract Map SUBTT16726 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public hearings ~n which concerned ~ndiv~duals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wart to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per ~nd~v~dual for each pro~ecf Please sign m after speaking B TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A residential subdivision of 15 single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Development Review DRC2004-00276 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors m June 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectwely, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR METROLINK RAILROAD/HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to lower the existing grade of Haven Avenue where it intersects to SCRRA railroad tracks The proposed action also includes construction of a temporary • • n u • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 8, 2004 C~ ONGA 3 detour of Haven Avenue (approximately 90 feet wide) and the railroad tracks (within the existing railroad right-of-way), a new bridge for the railroad tracks over Haven Avenue, and realignment of 8th Street The project area includes Haven Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and 7th Street, and approximately 1700 feet of the railroad track on either side of the intersection with Haven Avenue The proposed protect will not increase the number of lanes along Haven Avenue nor result in an increase in quantity of traffic Construction duration is expected to last approximately two years and will be initiated in 2004 Funding for this project is being provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The California Public Utilities Commission will be requested to approve the grade separation and temporary realignment of the railroad tracks The purpose and need of this protect is to improve the circulation of traffic at Haven Avenue and the SCRRA railroad tracks Three structures will be demolished or relocated as result of the temporary detour of Haven Avenue The structures include winery facilities (APN 0209-131-02) on the northwest side of the intersection of the railroad and Haven Avenue and two residences (APN 209-242-06 and 07) on the southwest side of the intersection of 8th Street and Haven Avenue Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 7,600 square foot BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse on 2 acres of land within the General Industrial Distrct (Subarea 12), located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Pittsburgh Avenue -APN 0229-263-48 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300 This action has been determined to be within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 E TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P - A subdivision for condominium purposes of 18 54 acres of land related to the development of 467 residential condominium units in the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18 Specific Plan), located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue -APN 0210-082-47 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00505 On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 8, 2004 ~~HO c[rcnMONCn 4 F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16769 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN -The proposed subdivision of 1 46 acre of land into three parcels in the General Industnal District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Variance DRC2001-00155 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON THIS ITEM. G VARIANCE DRC2001-00155 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to reduce the bwlding and landscape setbacks along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue on 1 46 acre of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street -APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16769 H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16507-HPA, INC -A request to subdivide 9 57 acres of land into four parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industnal District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-05 Related file Development Review DRC2004-00109 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VI. NEW BUSINESS I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00154 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to construct three light industrial bwidings (Bulding "A" - 6,274 square feet, Budding "B" - 7,312 square feet and Building "C" - 7,222 square feet) on 1 46 acres of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street -APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Variance DRC2001-00155 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16769 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109 -HPA, INC - A request to develop four industrial buildings totaling 196,995 square feet on 9 57 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-05 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration n ICJ n U C~ L_J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 8, 2004 RANGHG G'UCAMONGA rj VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 2, 2004, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~/LLy~wsy ~Ii~~ - If you need special assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission September 8, 2004 ~,B F E • • * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • N City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A residential subdivision of 15 single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Development Review DRC2004-00276 Staff has found the protect to be within the • scope of the protect covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Irntial Study/Addendum DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - Thedesign review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 15single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Et~wanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the protect covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Initial Study/Addendum certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2001, respectively, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • A Protect Density 3 42 dwelling urnts per acre ITEMS A & B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16726 AND DRC2004-00276-YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 2 B Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Single-Family Residential, South - Mass-Graded Subdwision, East - Single-Family Residential, West - Single-Family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Desipnatwns Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) D Site Characteristics The subject site has been rough graded and is surrounded by single-family dwelling units to the north, west and east that were recently constructed Single-family residences have been approved for the vacant parcel to the south, across Banyan Street The site slopes to the south and no urnque physical charactenstics are evident on the site All properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) BACKGROUND In June 1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the . University/Crest Planned Development in the City's Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commercial, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the Urnversity portion of the development from the Crest portion The University portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda ANALYSIS A General The density of the project will be 3 42 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the Basic Development Standards of the Development Code, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The homes will include four different plans, and each plan will have four different architectural styles (Bungalow, Country, Santa Barbara, and Ranch) The models include front porches or an option for aside-on third car garage Ali models that rear-on to Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street will have decks as a standard feature These are the same homes that the Planning Commission approved on September 11, 2002, for Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 and for Tract 16306 that was approved on June 25, 2003 B Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT16726 The applicant is proposing lot sizes ranging from 7,200 to 17,600 square feet, with an average lot size of 8,270. Intex properties originally owned the project site, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement includes provisions for either commercial or residential development The Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement includes an exhibit fora 15-lot layout should commercial development by Intex Properties not materialize Young California Homes has since acgwred the parcel and is proposing to ~~g a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16726 AND DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 3 subdivide the parcel into 15 single-family lots, as provided in the lot layout exhibit in the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement C Design Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Mc Phail, and Fong) on July 20, 2004 At the meeting, the Committee requested that the rear elevations of houses that have reverse frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street receive additional treatment and that the deck posts be modified to include a secondary material The Committee approved the project, directing the applicant to work with staff and revise the rear elevations to reflect the architectural enhancements and upgrades to the decks The rear elevations for lots that have reverse frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street (Lots 7-15) have been modified to include the following enhancements covered decks with supporting posts that have secondary materials (stacked stone, brick, or ledgestone) from the finished grade to the top of the deck ratling, variation in the deck railings, shutters, corbels, and divided light windows The applicant has presented revised drawings that reflect the architectural upgrades (Exhibit "H") The attached Resolution of Approval includes specific conditions that reflect the recent upgrades to the rear elevations and decks D Grading Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on July 20, 2004 The Committee approved the project subject to the following condition A 2-foot bench shall be provided at ail perimeter walls The Committee's condition has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval E Techrncal Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on July 20, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval F Environmental Assessment In June of 1991, the San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) forthe University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the project from the Crest portion The proposed project falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the project that would require a major revision to the previous EIR The project will be required to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development), as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and Initial Study/Addendum, as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A~' ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16726 AND DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 4 Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest Prolect requires that acoustical studies be prepared to assess noise levels for subsequent tracts within the University/Crest Prolect area In accordance with this regwrement, a noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 (March 16, 2004) The prolect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards, according to the sound study conducted Mestre Greve Associates The sound study evaluated the sound of levels of traffic from Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and the 210 Freeway Additionally, the sound study recorded early morning (5 30 a m to 9 a m.) noise measurements from heavy trucks traveling from the Hanson Aggregate processing faality located northwest of the prolect site The sound study concluded that building surfaces would be exposed to worst-case sound levels of 71 8 CNEL from roadway traffic The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with a 6-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed along the prolect frontage at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street Sound walls, in accordance with the height recommendations of the sound study, are included as conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 In accordance with the condition of approval for Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest prolect regwring that detailed indoor noise analysis for house product be performed, an interior noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Assocates (March 16, 2004) The detailed interior noise analysis concluded that standard construction practices (tile roofs, insulation in the stud cavities, 1/2-inch drywall, etc) would provide adequate exterior to interior sound attenuation for all 15 proposed dwelling units of Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi 6726 The sound study performed by Mestre Greve Associates utilized the SOUND32 model (March 16, 2004) Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga protocol, the sound study completed by Mestre Greve Assoaates was evaluated by an independent third parry, Marlund Hale, P.E ,PhD The evaluation of the independent third party concurred with the sound analysis and the corresponding sound wall mitigation measures recommended by Mestre Greve Associates Staff is of the opinion that no further environmental review is necessary because the prolect is (1) consistent with the approved Development Agreement for Rancho Etiwanda; (2) within the prolect scope of the above-cited, prior Environmental Assessments, and (3) all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed prolect NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed prolect on June 29, 2004 One resident attended the meeting The resident had general questions (estimated dates of construction, prices, etc) and stated support of the prolect The applicant answered all of the resident's questions CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within fI £ 8 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16726 AND DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 5 a 300-foot radius of the protect site Staff regwred the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public heanng notice RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 and Development Review DRC2004-00276 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DG ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Photo Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "H" - Enhanced Rear Elevations for Lots 7-15 Exhibit "I" - Fioor Plans Exhibit "J" - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated July 20, 2004 Exhibit "K" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 Draft Resolut ion of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00276 A ~~ +'~~+Y, k ~ ~~ /fit .il~^~ LEGEND _ __ _ app PApN9 VJCMRY MAP y".~~tik'~1 ~~' ~'.~, ~.. ~ . ~ ~''^(`-w' i' ~~ PREPARED FOFT ~ ~ G„Mr~ ,~,~;,~~!ti .ti ,, ~, _ ~, ;~, YOtiVG CALIFORNIA E]ONES x ti ~rav °`^O..~ G p ys,.~ mox[ (sxsl ev-raao a ~~ y ~~ R s' ~q €~C~i 's ppa „a ` ~~,~1 'b zy~ ~` ~ z' r" .. ¢~~~ PREPARED BY - ° ~2 ~"y. - :,~~y^^~i ~;~ ~ ~ ;", ~~~Z~ @L°z .., sert ern uoac mwmxz~ +~, i~ A, T TENTATIVE TRACT No 16726 ~" RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-15 ~~'# SITE UTILIZATION PHOTC ~_~ W~600' RADIUS DER'IR~IIm 1YICN t ]~ t ~t CIfT aF HANCFIO CUCAMOIgA CIXMTY OF 9AN BEFlNPA[NNO STATE OF CALIFCPMA ~ s SHEET 2 OF 8 _ r j -ctvDESOatE- - - -- _~~~ _Tr _ ~M_~ ,_ ', „~ \~\ L 3 4 ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,(/ :. w^~ti\~ /I =h ~~__ ~ i i~ ~ ."~_ '~ '~~ ,\ . ~ 9 I t_`l 6 P '~ L ,~„®.,.~x,wa,.~, RANCFb ETMlANDA PARK P nacruo '-`~i ax woo asJwn. ro~.o w. -11'OIIIYINTNM W1111lIMYtl [M1VICRW ~~i -BANXAN- - - --~ -~ - - n -BLU E--- - --- 11 ti ti .... '~ - - --~ -~-- - - ~_ ~a~ _ \~.~ P{BNi~ FOFF YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES ezio ~sxroi«iz°sm zoo reoxz po)ez~-soon L ~- PflEPAF~D BY .. ,..__ ,CT NO ~ .~"'• .`_._ ~'NZ ... _ _.... .E-(AMI. )EMWW i ---- I .,~..,,.x,o~m®. TENTATIVE TRACT No. 16726 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-15 SITE UTILIZATION MAP wrzin®unnm are rxeum wiw s m qIY OF RNKNO G1CAIKYlOA, COUNfY OF 9AN B6NAfiDNO, HfATE OF CALIFOFNA SHEET 3 OF 8 13 ib I 75 I i6 I#C~~ ~ -4~ I 44 I 4S I 46 I 47 ~ 48 ~ __-- _curucauntz-~L _ -__ _r-r_-. ~_ t i 4^nr-1- _-_ -r--_'-__ - ~ 60f I~50~ 58 ~~57 I 5H I 55 54 5T~ ~ n 51Y 4 50 49 ~' ~, I 1 N ., , _ 61 62 63 .a ~~_ _ _ _ I _ r~ ww ~ ~ 4 3 ~ 2 1 !1 1 Fx .. ROC P1Ci T 14 04 ~ E (SING _FM__M_.Y jRES__ ~AL)_,~ I 5 9 ~.~wv. LI' BN~_ _ _ _ Twy'ry ~IiLL ~e YLULIM~ . ~ ` __ _ _~ I _ _ _ __ ~ _ ~~ _ ~ _ 1 rr ~ 17 16 ~ b 2f1 ~ ~~ W .. ~ .:'. 3. 'l.L.~ • ~: ~ m ~~~m '(-/ Ir~ I J ~ 6rHE I ~E ~x"s~-~~ ~~e=r_=~ \! ~'~. v ~I TYP~C!I srn~'i eECiIONB - ~ w :env roF.~ zse.v w ivev roi,L xmv ~ ~pn v '" naaR ie]noon. ~ .. v sr i .a v mnoo+ ~ m v nm..~ws 'w uv wonaoa as noon ~ ~sav ao~ ~s ow.oE eus o.a.ae. exv awns ms v PLOTTMG MIX --T ~ RANCHO u o E fPN ANDA PARf< LOT SUMMARY 11!'b 5F WIOE9T lOT 911E ILOT 9) g ]Y.p 9F 9MN1FST lOT SQE POT ~) ezro sF evEwwFim s~ ~~~... _T4 ~ ~amr~s -i / m v . . m~. 1.J YRACT t`b '°°°'~ 15002 °°'~°"' ~ • ••• (SW6lF-FMAI.Y PREPARES RY eiiul J~[!1 • um neum vww a my CRY OF RANCHO CUCN10N04 COWRT OF 9AN BHd1APON0. SPATE 6 CALFOFNA SHEEP 6 OF B 12 I 13 I 14 I U I Y~ I 43 44 45 ^,0 47 40 i _ _.._...~=,~~ d~ ,•x.1:4 a,_ 60 5p 53 57 50 55 54 53 52 51 50 4p ' TFiA Y fU 4 ~~~-_ ~ inY.l r_cn InV n. MUTIAI I i J_ 1 _ L _J. `1 / / zm ,,,x~ + ro- 4 3 2 1 r, ~ _ K E PL 4 ( w iOC ING HO E .r >eR n is iD zp I ( " 'F17 ii zn z3 zz zi - r _ ...~- -- l f -~- ___25_ ___ ~ ___ 27 28 21 ;~ ~ (S i ~ ~~_ :I ' -- - - b ~ I 33 ~c 3 ~~FI i II 5~ e~7~ ~~ ~~ L_i x~~M ~~ _ c ~~,e~~ RANGFIO o'W°+°"°°°" /J1I+i. EYM'ANDA PARK NO1E3 - - =:_~s PpEPAFiED ~R YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES i ni°u:ivraxElu iieepa a IxOx{ (9I5/631-1¢O i PFiBAF>® BY .. r_r- TRACY ND -'"" ___° . _ ~". m..w m...m mma.. su~tE-PANIC RESIDENTIAL) I~ serrmenoae nuaom TENTATIVE TRACT No 16726 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-15 ROUGH GRADINGRPLAN Cli'! OF RANCFIO CUCAMCH9~ COUNfY of 9AN S39JAFagJ, SPATE of CAI.FOIIIJIA SHEET 5 OF 8 -~ I 13 14 15 I43 44 aw l~,~ ~~~~~ Il 45 46 47- ~s >--_` L'tYDE9E3At-E'_.I....__ra - -.. _~ ._-DRIVE-' ~_ ---__--+.-~ < 80 I 555 57 ~~ 55 54 53_ fi2~51 ~ 50 ~0 ' ~~ 61 62 63 i -~---,J6Q~ _ ~~ D. ---- ~..114r--'' d,~.~_ ~ - ~'~2 1 I h ~ 'D ~ iD ~ 20 ~r "Y`r -'~ ~~ i a . F- '_ ~pRtlCE -1.,~-I~RI~ ii/~ "~°` TYPICAL HiR~f 9E:fIOt/~ -=--T-- -r-~ -~-~- ti. ~ o"_ o.,. ~".. n.wr.umww~l ~nnNrv~owwral ma..~wow.~l aw~...uoow..oei TYPICAL LOT GRAINAGE NT9 'ET~FN ANA r,t_-°:°', ~4~..,.~w,s.~..~ I PARK ., j ""' •, ,_ ~_ ~-m.d~ -..- ,-r - t TRACT NJ ~ ~ ® -•Y - ~~~' 15002 -ere-" -- (SINGLE-FAMILY a®.~ a 4~ Pf1~AREO eY ro.+~ ~ /® PNBAR® FOR • 1 ~ 57 55 55 5r, RACT W40 53 52 51 SU 4F7 ; I I ~ i v N f ,~ 1 i 2 9 ,.6' ~ 1 'b ~ .7- F - _ K S3 -- ~ p- ~® M e • ~T! ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~ PY ANNA , ~ ' ~ ~~ , ~ 1 •.-/ t PAR}< y i r `~ ,` r. ~ , , i , N - - ~= - - ~~_ ' ~ ~. BANYAN -- _ ST REET ~~~ .~ -- - - _~-- -- ~ - I ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 I 8 BEGTgN MDEX - ~. _-~- .s __.. ..~.-~ ~.~ __....9EC110M 1i-H r~ .~~,... __ BECTIOti F~F .. PREPAi~ Hri PFi~ARED FOR .. .~...- YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES ~ =-- a~os~ 4e~exao -~ rxa[ (exs em-sooo •~•• •••~• eurteme uooc mmen "'~ TENTATIVE TRACT No 16726 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-15 GRADING SECTIONS m ~i ~' ~ n d,e~ ~mm u~...>ku~ ~s`$ CRY 6 RANCHO CUCA)ACtAA CClf1i1' OF 9AN BERINUNO 3fATE OF CALIFORdA SHEET 7 OF B ~.l®IEKa~WV~i.... t d 1~ C O ~I ~',F N~J i i N (p h tl N x~ ~~G ~_- ~ U' . ~ ~. N p~_ 7 ~~s_I E VV 4 i~ [ ! i~ ~ ~~~ll a ~ a o~"a ~y I I g~l~~llt sit ~ oI~FFi. . . -z- \_.~ m ;o °u N~ X ~~ g gp~~11 ~ 1 y+ yg N ~ 1y , tl I g5~~.li 0, 32~' ~~ O~'g~ m f EE 0 ~r i"" ® U~ 4~ ~~~ 1 ggil:lg gl I~; z S~ ~~~It ~ w ", ~" ' •, ~ U F ~ as ~ N 0 Sg.lgg.! !! z \J 1!!6 ~ I :: 0@ti~l~le Iggy3tl e e I' sieieillgll 1 Eta Q OQ pgi g{•g ~tli~~l-' t E wuiivlio F~9!_.0 ~ w~ ggtgt.gggl . ~ 1°~, ~~8 I~~ { @I ~ ~1t.1~;FIS 51 . , . Q: : g•.Ig s ~Ig ila o e s I Ilti F w ~ 4 1~ .~ ~ }t~ Z i W 11! ~ ~ a ~illp~ip9 ~~g °~g Z I t I i I 1 6 (I g~~~~e ~~o~~ ~ aF .! aF eC II 9iii,ttca$iggsA 1: ~ - ~IIIIIII11E19EI9~I. a ili rv~ 1 >~ `. l ~~, j ~~li /~ i ~ ~~a \ -~ i ^~~a.. ~ IC~4; `~I 1 ~~< T ~i ~: ~~ i'u ~r 3 ~ L ~~ ~= ll ",_~ , ;i~ .ii .; - y ~: w xa z~~~ O ~~~ d~~"E U .~F c75 z a 0 r I ~~ ~ ~~ ~r.~.e....~. .. ii~'+y L - ~-^~T: ~uti~m .~ ^RANYAN PERIMETER WALL..nm,a.nrl n.^°nl s.` S^ Iq~...~ ~~"'1 .. I .z AYCREEH fE RW L 1~° 1 .~ IMfAIOR fRIVA 0.ETU W LL ~ L ~1 MENORSHA0.EDPRECISIDN WALL 1 ~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN TRACT NO 16726 TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY RANChiO CUCAMONGA CA YOUNG CALIFORNIA CUCAMONGA, L P ~ MONTERRA IV of Rancho Ehwanda +I M! cx ve-~ -:~sxr ~ JR=':.v'Ya ~11'ERIMEIER 0.CTAMNS WALL$ _ l®~ / ne.~n v. ~~~a~.u„m / / i~ // WAILIEGEND O ~ ,..~+nln~..r...,.... ~. n.iw5nr O, r~niM rrn wrn.,.e n.u.~~~ O __ .n.... n.mi iw,,....,...,n......i o -.nm..~:M,,,~ o ~,~,~.r..n~..w,~~,.,,,t.,,_,.~..~ SLOI'L PLAN4INC NOTES vnrv.rve~ n~ni~x~v.w.nil °iru°,~nirr ~rnze.m~.nu •~sa~uve PLANT PALCTTE r ~+ ~~ v.n o.i. ~Oo wo...~R~n. rs.._~.. ,.....,,.. v ,12 MONIIAIENf WAIL LRUNI f1 EVATIDNAA -Y O v.erv.~cm M.wr„i.roi..a. © ~r~~~Rnn uM.rc~rn.... P PICAL FRONTI ARD LAYOUT r~_.a ~..,._ ,_._., I ~''~IIny~D~/\RI^y~V\(E~AW~IIAY OPTIONS ~' u .nc ir.'.~mn ~%_ -~m ~g~~a . ~m~ or r~~oaT "f ~ U • m0 2 V 3 ~; w~ 00 x~ ~¢ ~o Qw V ~¢ W C7 ~O ....... i~ ~~ m I/r~J,'1 1 V `M. ~_ C~ • A BLACK R STUCCO C STUCCO C00.BEL5 D SXUTIERS E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFPIG O MANUFAOURF.O SfOMG H MANUFACNRED STONE 1 WOOD PoRCH MII,LNG SECIlONA1 GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE 50% WfIH wDJDOWS K STUCCOOVER FOAM T0.DA SURROUND AT WRNOWS AND D00R5 4 OUROOKER M OPf10NAl DE[K II~_I ~~ ' ~ %i'~ xlc;H i LEFT ELEVATION 2 A BUNGALOW ' MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA s YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ,a ^..~Y ..............~.. Yo.Twrn t T.Matlw TrM 1lT36 13 Lob Cu. NUmWn SUSTT IET2l AND DRC 30W-0031! Y.y To, zow ~1 N IC l ~M_ s .~~ee newawT" 3 - i ..,_...,..ry..._. sn s A Bacx e sTUCCo c sTUCCOCOaBELs D SHUTTERS E STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFING O MANUFACNRFD SD)MG H MANUFACNRED STONE I WOOD PORCH RAILDIG 1 SECTONAL GARAGE D00R PROVIDE 50X WITH WINDOWS K SNCCO OVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WRJDOWS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OPTIONAL DECK ELEVATION 2 B COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ~~K 1 Nonbrtn ~ Tenbtlva Tnd 1672! t! LOb Cne Number lUBTT 16T26 AND DRC i0W-OOii! Nq 10 IOM a (~ ~~ ,~ v A BRICK B STUCCO C STUCCO CORBEIS D SHIfITERS E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFING G MANIhACNRED SRIMG H MANIhACNRED STONE 1 WOOD PORCH RARDJO 1 SECf10NAL GARAGE DDOR PROVIDE 50% WITH WINDOWS K SNCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WNDOWS ANO DOOPS L OUTLOOKER M OPf10NAL DECK • RIGHT a ,~- _~ ELEVATION 2 C RANCH 1 ( •.~m..u u.~mm~ N srr D MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP Monbnn ~ T.nn1n TrM Seim 16 Lob Can NUmban SUB1T iRTm AND ORC 30W-0OiT6 May 10, 3001 ~~ -` M . ~A o0 ti BRIGK B SNCCO C STUCCO CORBELS D SHUI'IERS ¢ SNCCO OVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE 0.00FMG O MANUFACFURED SIOMG H MANUFACNRED eNNE I WOOD PoRCH RAILING 1 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR P0.0VIDE5~ WITH WMDOWS K STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM SURROIMD AT WRJDO WS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OPTIONAL DECK ...,.,.. ELEVATION 2 D SANTA BARBARA t 1 /1 srr MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWAN~A YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP RIGHT Mom.mn. Tn+IaBV. me leT:a to Lob Laaa NUmEan SUBTT 1eTxe ANO Dnc xaaaoxye May 10 InoA • s C~ s ~£~~~ s°: ak£ U a WG ~~ s E i u Q Q Q 1--~ 3~ Hw w~ 00 zx 7UryQJ W ¢w F~1 ZU< C U W C7 a ~Z ~~ ., _ ;d 1 L_ _ - L V L n r~ ''1^~1 / V A BRICK B SNCCO C SNCCO CORBELS D SHUTTERS E' STUCCO OVER FOAM TRIM F CONCREffi ROOFMO G MANUFACRIRED SIOMG H MANUFACFURED STONE 1 WOOD PORCH RAILMO J SECTONAL GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE fOX WITH WMDOWS K STUCCOOVER FOAM T0.IM SURROUND AT WMDOWS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OPTIONAL BECK ~~ RIGHT .a ~M. Q v ~I ~ /_) j ~ /~ I :~ ~e n ~w~- i~ REAR I ELEVATION 3 A BUNGALOW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP F H~ LEFT ' M,M.m.t T.Bnnw Tr,c++e]ta ,3 LRh C.,a NUmbn $UBTT 16]25 ANO D0.C 2001-002]8 M.Y 10. ZSBC /G • n U V / J ~M 1~``1 4W` V .,, ,.,- w BRICK B STllCCO C STUCCO CORBELS D sxuTrEu E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFING G MANUFACNRED EIDMO H MANUFACNRED STONE I WOOD PORCH RA¢INO 1 SECf10NAL GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE SOX WITH WINDOWS K SNCCOOVE0. FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WMpOWS ANp DOORS L OUD.OOKER M OPTIONAL DECK E11 / i ~1I REAR ELEVATION 3 B COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP Monbrm { r.nbtlvR rl«11a)ze ,! Lob 6u Numbn 9UBTT 15)]! ANO ORC tOMAO])! M.y 1a, zoa n _ ~tl x C' ~~ 0. BRICK ~. E{ b: B S1V000 C STUCCO CORBELS D SHVtTERS E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFMG ~ G MANUFACFURED SIDMO H MANUFACTURED STONE I WOOD PORCH RAILMG 1 SECTIONAL GARAGE D000. PROVIDE 5414 WITN WINDOWS K STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WINDOWS AND ODORS L OVROOKER M OPTIONAL DECK RIGHT " l''1. Q ~i I IVU_t_A\ttll'I\1115 architecture 1\LiAl\ ELEVATION 3 C RANCH MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP Monnrtn TmMW~TncHST26 16 Lob CReR NUmbn 8UB1T 1SIIS AND oac 2oaaane MRy to,:ooA n ~^ Vf1J ' y ` '~M- L1 _~ A sn +..- A B BRICK -- STUCCO -- ~ ` Y C STUCCO CORBELS D SHUTTERS E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFMG G MANUFACNRED SIDMG B 1 MANUFACTURED STONE WOOD PoRCH RAILMG I SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE SO%WIT}1 WINpOp~S K STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SII0.1t0UND AT WMDOWS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OPf10NAL DECK R ~ RIGHT ~~~ REAR I ELEVATION 3 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP LISC 1 M0111.11I.. renhtlv. rhm +eTZe 15 Loh Cu•Numbn 9UBTT 1e136 AND DRC 3001-002Te M•Y 10 300• ,g I G ~~~ I I~II~~~d - I ~II- -~ ~~- a - 9~ B- BARBARA -•- a, - rctuv~.n PLAN 4 °1o,,b,,,,, i° lab ~ MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA ]'"b"""°"'°"° tw NumCm SOBTT IDRS AND • t YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP pgC2001-003'° May 1D 300 ......... ..~.vM. 7/ e rr ~+•>w s ~, V ' /` 4 ~ _ `~V ( .~ ~I ~~'~'~~ s ~ A BRICK B STUCCO C S1L000 CORBELS D sxlrrtms E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRlZE ROOFP'G G MANUFACNRED SB)MG H MANUFnCNRED STONE I WOOD PORCH MILMG 1 SECTIONAL OAMGE DDOR PROVIDE 50%WITx WMDOWS K STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT W RJDOW 5 AND DOORS L OUTLOOKE0. M OTONAL DECK I L ~~ ,: ~I_~~I~ REAR ELEVATION 4 A BUNGALOW MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP I I 1_I_~ ~~ I I 1 1 I ~~~ I~-, ~%~i RIGHT K~ ,_/ E~ LEFT ' wm.~... a TmhIM rlm tern 16 Loh a.. Numh.n sueTT tnze AND Dac zoowo:re Lhy+o, zuo. ,,. e n ~r~- t~ x c= N ,(\~ V A BwcK B STUCCO C STUCCO CORBELS o sSnnTERs E 9TV000OVEA FOAM TNIM F CONCRhZE ROOFING O MANUFAC)UREp SIDING H MANUFAC)URED STONE I WOOD PORCH RAILOJG 1 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOD0. P0.0VIDE 50'/. WITH WDJpOWS K SNCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUI AT WINDOWS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OFpONAL DECK S ~ MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETI WANDA t _.,,_,._..... _ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP e n .`s~ i f FApIn.Rn TmbOr. TnN 161]5 16 Lob G». NUmWn 9UBTT 551]5 AND DRC ]OW-00]15 M.y SD, ]ow i 7~ ~enR~ ELEVATION 4 B COUNTRY A Baclc B SNCCO C SNCCO CORBELS o slRlrrexs E SNCCO OVER iOAM TRIM F CON[REFE ROOFMG /~ ~ G MANUFACNRED SIDING 1 ` ' H MANUFACNRED STONE V 1 WOOD FORCH RAILING f 1 SECHONALOARAGE DOOR PROVIDE 50% WITH WNDOWS R SNCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROIB AT WINDOWS AND DOORS v L OUTI.OOKER .. M OPTIONAL DECK ~~ ~ ELEVATION 4 C RANCH f ~ MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA t YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP MODbrtA ~ r«muw rncl+ene 16 Lab CRO NVmbm 9UBT+ST33 AND DRC IDDI-0031! M•r+a, xow N cn yr /` A BRICK R SNCCO C SNCCO CORBELS D SHUTTERS E SNCCOOVER iOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFING _ O MANIIFACNREp a1DMG (~ N MANUFACTURED STONE U T 1 WOOD PORCN RAILMG 1 SECTIONAL OAMGE DOOR PROVIpE SOX WITH WINDOWS ~ K SNCCOOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND r AT WMI%1W5 AND ODORS ~i L OUTLOOKER M OPTIONAL DECK -, M , Ai o0 i~ ,:>° it Kr;AK ELEVATION 4 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ~ ~~ ~~ F RIGHT LEFT Monbrtn ~ bndtlve Tnc[ 18]26 15 Lab c... NUmbel. sueTr le]2e ANo oac xao,-acne May 10 2660 JS ~'1 ~_~ _~~ ~~ ~i~~ x, l~~, ~~~~~ €~°<~~ ~~°s~ ~~ ms ,. m; ~~ ~~ Q A Q~ E~ W W~ Ux F, O Q~ U ~¢ H~ a ~~ . ~ _- L =o x ~ I_, d i, .: _s _. U L CJ X~~ ~ ~E d a ll -~S I ~- ~' i _`R~` V 1 M ~` c C A BMCx e sTUCCo C SNCCO CORBELS D SFRfFI'E0.S B STUCCOOVER FOAM T0.IM F CONCREFE 0.00FMG G MANUFACNRED SIDING N MANUFACTURED STDNE 1 WOOD Po0.CN MLLING 1 SECItONAL GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE fOX WfIH WMDOWS K STUCCOOVE0. FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WMDOWS AND D000.3 L OVILODKER M OPTIONAL DECK ~~ B L ~I RIGHT ELEVATION 5 A BUNGALOW Montenre ~ TenMOVe Ind 18Y30 MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA 'SLR, DRD 300400318 r _ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP De.. NumE.n SDBTT,8T33 AND .,...' .... .......... Mry 10. 30M 7c e.I•~iFa-u.. ~ • i _~ c= J a (!~ A BRICK B SNCCO C STVCCO CORBEL3 O SHUTTERS E STUCCO OVER FOAM TRPI F CONCRETE ROOFING G MANUFACNRED SIDING H MANUFACNRED STONE I WORD PORCH HIEING 1 SECOONAL GARAGE DOOR P0.0VIDE 50% WITH WMOD We K STUCCOOVE0. FOAM TRIM SORROUND AT WMDOW9 AND DOORS L OIIILOOKER M OPLIONAL DECK ELEVATION SB COUNTRY MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA e YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP RIGHT Monbrm r•Rbn.. Tr•cl lerx Se Lob c•••HUme.~ suety ~eTZe •ND Dac zoawone M•r lo, zoa r e H +~.- ~- r _~ A~ I PDA dctirn 1.1111.1 architecture A BRICK B SNCCO c sTVCCO CORREu D SHUTTERS E STUCCOOVE0. PoAM TRIM F CONCRETE 0.00FING G MANUFACNRED SIDfNG H MANUFACtURED STONE I WOOD PoRCH RAILMG 1 aECfiONAL OAMGE pOpR PROVIDE 50% WITH WMDO WS K STUCCOOVER PoAM TRIM SURRDUND AT WMDG WS AND DOO0.5 L OUTLOOKE0. M OPTIONAL DECK ELEVATION 5 C RANCH. MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP ~i ~ IL~!I .~ _ I-i.~.i I-'I I ~~ I I RIGHT LEFT Manbrrn ~ Tnbtlva Tract 18)]8 to Lou c,a. HUmwn suerr /aTm AHD DRC mw.ssna May 1a, 3aa1 V /~ V '' -(~.. . ~ ~ ! A BacK B SNCCO C 3T0000 CORBELS O 3HUTTERS E STUCCOOVER FOAM TRIM F CONCRETE ROOFMG G MANUFACNRED 3101NG H MANUFACNRED STONE 1 WOOD PORCH RAILING 1 3ERIONAL GARAGE DOOR PROVIDE SOX WITH WINDOW3 K 3T000OOVER FOAM TRIM SURROUND AT WMDOWS AND DOORS L OUTLOOKER M OP11ONAL DECK ~ ~~ RIGHT 1Wl1A\ ELEVATION 5 D SANTA BARBARA MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA s YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP s lami..Y ....a~.,~.....~..,... Monbrtro 1 r•m.NV. Troe FRns 16 Lob Cas Numb•n BUBTf 10]36 ANC ORC 1001-0OtT! May 10 3001 a/ x ~~ _~ C~ ...C_ PLAN 4A -LOT 7 TRACT No 16726 MONTERRA IV at RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP. PLAN 4D -LOT 12 PLAN SC -LOT 8 x ~~ (`n i ! A -LOT 10 B -LOT 13 • )D TRACT No 1672b PLAN 3 MONTERRA IV at RANCHO ETIWANDA m~oM®,~, ~,~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP. C -LOT 15 P ~~ I N_ _~.- A-LOT 14 PLEXIC BEFIIND RA'. TRACT No 16726 PLAN 2 MONTERRA IV at RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP. B-LOT9 C - LOT l l • s • ,X C1 ~I N~ (~ - \' ~n ovr Deck a ~ m ~ \~ a •~ ~ r ~ ~ BIDROOM2 MASTPR MHATH O eEDROOM y'{'~~3 (^r~~~'~,,II'+II"~ 9 ~{ \lC ~, ~1 r o I.ORPBHDRM. S O ~ B ID ROOM 3 'I l i ! l7 BAZ ~ tl IT1 1-! BoIDRDOM L Y J- ~_r tt ~~ SOUASE FOOTAGE PLAN 2 2168 TO 2348 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA 8 _ m ~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP an ~ Mom•rtne r•mm• rr.c<tene 1e toe. Om RUmb•r• eUHTT ieIxe AND ORC x0040031! xN Mry te, 20M e yI~'~r ~_ 14-0 _--'1 '1 N___________ ______________G DPl' DECK j'~ ,yam - a CI ~ O i eeDRM.a`r _ RETREAT O M BATH MASTER E flEDR00M ~ F 7 i.na ~- y 1: OPTIONAL IT~__ ___ ~ - BONVS ROOM/ II v~.~6 II ~ BA2 ' II ~ U ~ fi a`: II ....~ ""^ ~PDROOM! ~~ rr -~~ ~~----TT BEDROOM 2 _ ~ l--L A--4 ~ n i a PLAN 3 2289 TO 2698 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA _ # a,....~,.,. YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP a i] Ama • • NNOOK t KRCHEN DINING anY. , M-I- I~LR'INO 11 1 III / !1 PORt71 P~ U _ _(i SUPeR ~: ~ FAMD.Y IR. a.a~ .. I =__ __ WORK SPACE y__ ~- - :LAU BED S/DEN b' u t aARADe » _ lOUARE FOOTAGE r„i,~.a r .~~ Mamama/ brMlha Tract 1fi]2fi °"' r~ 1l Lab Loa NUmbm BDBTT I!]2fi AMO '~~~'~~ '~~ r.. ORL EO04fi02ifi MaY 10, t00a H i i i N~ N- ~~ Illl NOOK ~ 0 peDROOMS PAMR.Y p1"~ PAMR.Y e l - ~ uveao .4 ~' exrRY .... r DARAae yew WORK SPACPJ DIN/OFPICe ..e .+ + PLAN 4 2511 TO 3026 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA ~ YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP e i>,> ama- ....s........~...... 90UAflE FOOTAGE T.nblly. Tnc1191M t9lob Co. NumMn 9UBTT ID1x9 ANC one xoorao:l9 M.100, xoa n x ~A 9 t~ _ ~ • b/1 fml- PLAN 5 2350 SQ FT MONTERRA AT RANCHO ETIWANDA YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, LP SOUARE FOOTAGE Mo/rtema t r.m.w. m./ lots is gym. c... MwnGn suers lens y,ao oac xsswsns May 10, SOM w • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Donald Granger July 20, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A residential subdivision of 15single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Development Review DRC2004-00276 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 15 single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Background The applicant is proposing a 15-lot subdivision with house product (Monterra 4) The homes have been designed with four architectural styles (Bungalow, Country, Ranch, and Santa Barbara), and will include a total of four floor plans Three of the plans include front porches, and the remaining plan has an option for aside-on garage The applicant is proposing the same house product that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on September 1 t, 2002, for Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 (Development Review DRC2002-00442), and for Tentative Tract 16306 (Development Review DRC2002-01029), which was approved on June 25, 2003. Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 (Monterra 1) are located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, on the north and south sides of Vintage Drive Tract 16306 (Monterra 2) is located at the southwest corner of Vintage Dnve and Day Creek Boulevard Monterra 3 (Development Review DRC2003-01186), located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee on May 18, 2004 The model homes for Tracts 14493-1 and 14522 will serve as the model homes for the proposed protect Design Parameters The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda planned development, a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County in May 1991, and, subsequently, annexed in to the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect site was rough graded when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed The site is bordered bysingle-family homes to the north and west, and future single-family homes, to the south, across Banyan Street Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all mator issues • Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues i< <' i DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P July 20, 2004 Page 2 1 The decks should be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The decks shall have variation including, but not limited to, in the railing, deck sizes, materials, and supporting posts Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 All interior private yard slopes are regwred to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 2 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used. Stone veneers are not permitted 3 Provide decorative pavement on driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdivision Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that with the Secondary Issue addressed, the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Fong, McPhail Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the protect and recommend approval, sublect to policy issues and the following conditions The decks shall be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The supporting structural members on the decks shall match the secondary materials on the houses (river rock, stacked stone, bnck, etc) The bnck work, stacked stone, or river rock shall be carved up to the deck flooring The decks shall also have upgraded treatment and variation including, but not limited, to plexiglass or covered elements with exposed trusses Final design shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval The rear elevations on houses that have reverse frontages on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard shall be substantially enhanced to provide visual interest Enhancement shall include the addition of several elements including, but not limited to, greater use of divided light windows, corbels, shutters, potshelfs, and keystones in the window surrounds Final design shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval • • `~ ~, ~Ic~sa~- --s-~ R~L3~'a BACKGROUND INITIAL STUDY PART II City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Project File: Tentative Tract DRC2004-00276 2. Related Files: None Map SUBTT16726 and Development Review 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P - A residential subdivision of 15single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 15 single-family lots on 4 39 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-101-34 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Young California Homes 6210 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street The protect site was rough graded when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed The site is bordered by a subdivision under construction to the west, Banyan Street to the south, Day Creek Boulevard to the east, and future single-family homes to the south The site slopes to the south and no unique physical characteristics are evident on the site C~ 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner tl (909) 477-2750 ~ ~Eb~3 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tanrativa Tract Mao SUBTT16726 and Development Review DRC2004-00276 Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred: None ANALYSIS: The Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda area provides fora 15-lot single-family subdivision for this property on the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The Site Plan and Grading Plan for proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 and Development Review DRC2004-00276 are m substantial compliance for the residential option plotting layout previously approved in the Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development The protect will be regwred to implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and Initial Study/Addendum, as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest Protect regwres that acoustical studies be prepared to assess noise levels for subsequent tracts within the University/Crest Protect area In accordance with this regwrement, a noise study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 (March 16, 2004) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards, according to the sound study conducted Mestre Greve Associates The sound study evaluated the sound of levels of traffic from Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street and the 210 Freeway Additionally, the sound study recorded early morning (5 30 a m to 9 a m) noise measurements from heavy trucks traveling from the Hanson Aggregate processing facility located northwest of the protect site The sound study concluded that bwlding surfaces would be exposed to worst-case sound levels of 71 8 CNEL from roadway traffic The exterior noise level can to mitigated to less than 60 dBA with a 6-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed along the protect frontage at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street Sound walls, in accordance with the height recommendations of the sound study, are proposed as conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 In accordance with the condition of approval for Mitigation measure No 101 for the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR for the University/Crest protect regwring that detailed indoor noise analysis for house product be performed, an interior nose study was completed by Mestre Greve Associates (March 16, 2004) The detailed mtenor noise analysis concluded that standard construction practices (tile roofs, insulation in the stud cavities, 1/2-mch drywall, etc ) would prowde adequate exterior to interior sound attenuation for all 15 proposed dwelling units of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 The sound study performed by Mestre Greve Associates utilized the SOUND32 model (March 16, 2004) Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga protocol, the sound study completed by Mestre Greve Associates was evaluated by an independent third party, Marlund Hale, P E , PhD The evaluation of the independent third party concurred with the sound analysis and the corresponding sound wall mitigation measures recommended by Mestre Greve Assoaates A~ ~ ~~ C~ initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 and Development Review DRC2004-00276 Page 3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect Prepared By Date z Reviewed By ate ~/Z~` EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised Urnversity protect (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Protect (Certified August 1, 2001) (X) Nose Analysis for Tentative Tract 14493 Mestre Greve Assoaates (March 16, 2004) (X) Third Party Review of Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 14493 Marlund Hale, Ph D, P E (May 8, 2004) ~~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16726 and Development Review DRC2004-00276 Page 4 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature /~~ r,,, /~~ /_ O Date ~ ^ , Pnnt Name and Title 1 Il6 f~C.. / ~ t e+u~c~D.. ~ P ~. ~/'C.~L~~1~1~L ~' ~c C ~~ RESOLUTION NO 04-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 15SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 4 39 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-101-34 A Recitals 1 Young California Homes, L P filed an application for the approval of Tentabve Tract Map SUBTT16726, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On September B, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced heanng on September 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the south is vacant with an approved entitlement for single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the east is developed vnth single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to west is developed v~nth single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity, and d The proposed subdivision falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development and is designed in substantial compliance with the approved Development Agreement for the Rancho Etiwanda area, and f~~t3 y~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-103 SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 2 e All lots of the proposed subdrvision meet the minimum 7,200 square foot area minimum, and f The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback, and g The proposed subdivision wdl have gross density of 3 42 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on September 8, 2004, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property wdhin the proposed subd~wsion 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development m June 1991 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 2001, the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial Reporte5 Basedpupon t e facts land nforrnatontocontamed in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together vnih all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment, and concludes as follows a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that regwre mator revisions • substantial~ncrease~n the selventy ofRhe p ev oc slyedentfied sig9ficant effects, andntal effectsor ~~ e ys' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-103 SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 3 b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the arcumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will regwre mayor revisions to the previous Envvonmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects, and c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) sigmficant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown m the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives prewouslyfound not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altematrve, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decime to adopt the mitigation measure or altematrve 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condilion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) As regwred per the Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, a 6-foot high sound wall shall be constructed along the penmeter of Lots 7 through 15 The grease Grading Plan submitted for plan check for development of the subdivision shall indicate the penmeter wall 2) The penmeter wall shall be constructed in accordance vnth the height and the location recommendations made in the acoustical reports by Mestre Greve Associates, dated March 16, 2004 3) The Developer shall provide wntten notice, in the form of a disclosure, to each prospective buyer of the Fourth Street Rock Crushing Facility located northwest of the protect site The disclosure shall inform the homebuyer of the use of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard as a truck route to and from the rock crushing facility and the occurrence of truck traffic noise 4) A 2-foot wide bench shall be provided at all penmeter walls 5) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 6) Ail penmeter walls and all walls exposed to public view shall be decorative Penmeter walls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street shall adhere to the approved wall design and matenals palette for Day Creek Boulevard and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to, river rock pilasters ~~6 y9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-103 SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 4 7) Where slope conditions require retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner pnor to issuance of grading permits 8) The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check for development of the subdivision shall indicate a neighborhood entry monument wall at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street The entry wall shall be constructed in accordance with the approved design for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development 9) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between the back of the sidewalk and 6-foot block wall on all comer side lots 10) Side yard retaining wall heights shall be a maximum of 4 feet 11) The cut-de-sac street name is not approved by this application and shall regwre separate submittal for review and approval pursuant to the Street Naming Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 12 12) ~~ 12) The final map(s) shall utilize the tentative tract number (e g , 16726, 16726-1, etc ) Enaineennp Division 1) Existing public improvements along Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street frontages shall be protected in place or repaired, as needed 2) Internal streets to be improved m accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, including, but not limited to the following a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and asphalt pavement, as requred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide traffic stnping and signage, as regwred 3) Provide sidewalk easement on both sides of Ironstone Dnve 4) Owner of Lot 15 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said lot along Rocking Horse Place Provide mow stops to separate public and pnvate maintenance areas 5) Parkways shall slope a12 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 6) Street trees along Rocking Horse Place shall be installed per City Drawing No 1811 ~E 6~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-103 SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P • September 8, 2004 Page 5 7) Landscape Maintenance Distnct (LMD) plans shall be consistent with existing Drawing No 1803-L, including the monument walls at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street 8) This protect is connected to or will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and imgation area Pnor to new construction, a toint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector The existing imgation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area fora minimum of 90 days after reconstruction A follow-up inspection of both areas is regwred pnor to the City's acceptance of the new area 9) The City has established a traffiGcirculation improvement fee for the general surrounding development area This development shall participate in the fair share cost distnbution for the traffiGcirculation improvements Environmental Mibpatwn i 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development), as covered by the EIR certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and the Supplemental EIR and Initial Study/Addendum, as certified by the City ' of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2002, respectively 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Macias, Chairman ATTEST • Brad Buller, Secretary I ~~651 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-103 SUBTT16726 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~~ ~~a 5a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 SUBJECT: 15 LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to detend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Ctty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-04 ( 1 i\planning\final\pingcomm\subtt16726std cond 9-6 doc ~~ ~~~ Protect No SUBTr16726 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be D iwsion submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safely to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Rewsed site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, buildmg, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 Street names shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _J~_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs fast A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to . the issuance of bwldmg permits D. Landscaping 1 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~_!_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineerrng Division E. En vironmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _/_/_ Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the Ctty Adopted Special _/_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways _/_/_ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm~subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc 2 ~ t ~5~1 Protect No SU8TTt6726 Completion Date noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the . Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 6 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Cary staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall prowde a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE. ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, • b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and av conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , SUBTT16726) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Bulding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements .H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked SC-1-04 , i \planning\final\pingcomm\.subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc 3 ~ £ ~ ~~ _/_/. -/~- / / / / / / / / -/-/- -/-/- Protect No SUBTTi6726 with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT16726) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or motor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limned to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no constructton on Sunday or holidays New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for requred occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be to accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new constructton protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Comoleaon Date -~-~- ~_~- ~ ~~- -/~- -/~- ~-~_ _/~ _/~- -/~_ -/~- -/~- S~-,_o4 t \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc 4 ~~ 65~ Praiect No SUBTT16726 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE ~ITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Clty for all Interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faculties as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following nghts-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 49-55 total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard 40 total feet on Banvan Street 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty L. Street Improvements • 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Medren Island Bike Trail Other Day Creek Boulevard le) Banyan Street (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided . for this item rat Existing improvements to be protected In place or replaced as needed SC-1-04 Comoletion Date / / / / ~~- / / / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / i\planning\final\pingcommGsubtt16726std cond 9-8 doc 5 t'1~' J/ 1 Project No SUBTT76726 Completion Date Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on _/~ future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completjon of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs fast b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/~_ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office jn addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic sjgnal conduit, and _/~_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Cjty Engineer d Signal condut with pull boxes shall be installed wjth any new construction or reconstruction ~_/_ protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards _/_/_ or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate _/ detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall ~ be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Undersidewalk drains shall be installed ~~_ to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Cary Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~~_ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Crry Standards in accordance ~~_ with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and constructjon notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typjcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans ~1 LJ SC-1-04 i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc 6AE$5~ Protect No SUBTT76726 Comole4on Date M. The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Stze Oty Ironstone Drwe Prunus blireiana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal Fill In Rocking Horse Place Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3' 25 O C 15 Gal Banyan Street Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3' 20' O C 24" Box 'Muskogee' Lavender Background 30 % Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20' O C Min 15 Gel 35' O C Min Back round 70 % Pinus Eldarica At han Pine 8' 15 Gal Day Creek Boulevard Street Tree Washingtonia Robusta Mewcan Fan Palm 4' 25' O C 15' B T H Min of 5' Away From Staggered Min or Street Ught Rows On Match Est Altemate Heights Side of Walk 25'OC Street Tree Pyrus calleryana NCN 4' Staggered 15 Gal 'Aristocrat' Rows On Matched Altemate Standards Sde of Walk 25'OC Beckground Background Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree 5' Where Room 15 Gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas SC-1-04 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Creek Boulevard and Banvan Street Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc ~~BSq / / _/~_ / / / / Protect No SUBTT16726 Completion Date 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the -/-/- developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/~ Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas O. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric _/_/_ power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilitles as necessary -/-/-- 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the _/_/_ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdiwsion or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of _/_/_ the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them ls d A s pprova P. General Requirements an 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new ~_/_ streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwiding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be _/~_ paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit 1s fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submltted to the Engineering Division when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-oa i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt16726std cond 9-8 doc a A~bino • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 8, 2004 Young Cahfom~a Homes SFR Tract 16726 DRC2004-00276 & SUBTT16726 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gwdehnes for Fn•e Hydrants The following provides design gu~dehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m single-farmly residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or res~dent~al protect from the public roadways 2 At mtersect~ons 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As regmred by the Fue Safety Dw~s~on to meet operational needs of the Fire D~stnct 5 A rmmmum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow I The regmred fire flow for this protect will be calculated m gallons per nunute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This reginrement ~s made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire D~stnct Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regmred fue flow subtect to Fire D~stnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes regmre approved Fire D~stnct vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application ~ §~~ P~lv ~ Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire D~stnct "Apphcauon for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall subrrut a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all ex~stmg fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Subrmttal Procedure Standard #9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the mstallat~on and witness the hydrant flushing Fue Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber ~s dropped 2 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the regmrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the fm~shed surface of the road 3. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant ~s responsible for obtaining the fire flow mformat~on from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Public Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed to accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with m~mmum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bmldmg setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, add~t~onal 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry ~}E C3lo~ RESOLUTION NO 04-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2004-00276, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 15SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16726 ON 4 39 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-101-34 A Recitals 1 Young California Homes, L P filed an application for the approval of Development Review No DRC2004-00276, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Parl A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on September 8, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street with a street frontage of approximately 289 feet along Day Creek Boulevard and a street frontage of approximately 658 feet along Banyan Street, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the south is vacant with an approved entitlement for single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the east is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, the property to west is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low Residential, and c The project site has a density of 3 42 dwelling units to the acre, which is within the permitted density range of the Low Residential District, and d The applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain their feedback, and ~}~ 3 lv3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-104 DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 2 e The pro/ect falls vvithm the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, which inGuded a conceptual layout fora 15 lot single-family development at this location, and f The pro/ect meets or exceeds all applicable technical requirements and design gwdelines of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement No CO 00-088 and the Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed pro/act is consistent with the ob/actives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is m accordance with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct m which the site is located, and c The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in/unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development m July 1991 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 2001, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues assoaated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes m the protect that would requre a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained m the certified Environmental Impact Report, together with all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and concudes as follows a There have not been substantial changes m the protect that require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects, and b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will regwre mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase m the seventy of previously identified significant effects, and c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known vnth the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental A£j~lo~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-104 DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 3 Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would m fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Where slope conditions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading permits 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of sidewalk and block walls on all comer lots 3) As required per the Interior Noise Analysis by Mestre Greve AssoGates dated March 16, 2004, for the protect site, a 6-foot high sound wall along the penmeter of Lots 7 through 15 shall be constructed 4) A 2-foot wide bench shall be provided at all penmeter walls 5) Side yard retaining wall heights shall be a maximum of 4 feet 6) All intenor side and rear walls shall be of block matenal 7) The Developer shall provide wntten notice, m the form of a disclosure, to each prospective buyer of the Fourth Street Rock Crushing Faality located northwest of the protect site The disclosure shall inform the homebuyer of the use of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard as a truck route to and from the rock crushing facility and the occurrence of truck traffic noise S) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots wntten notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 9) The decks shall be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard The deck railings shall have vanation, and the supporting structural ~~ B ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-104 DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 4 members on the decks shall match the secondary matenals on the houses (nver rock, stacked stone, bnck, etc) The bnckwork, stacked stone, or nver rock shall be tamed up to deck railing On Lots 7, 9-11 and 13-15 the decks shall have a solid roof that matches the roof matenal on the dwelling umt Final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 10) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real, or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 11) Decorative pavement shall be provided on the dnveways Decorative dnveways shall have vanation throughout the subdivision 12) Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a matenal more durable than wood gates Acceptable matenals mGude, but are not limited to, wrought iron and plastic 13) The protect wll be developed according to the approved Site Plan and corresponding Extenor and Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, adhenng to all regwremenis of the Intenor Noise Analysis Replotting of the houses wll regwre additional mtenor noise analysis to be performed in order to demonstrate that the houses will meet the City's Intenor Noise Standards 14) The rear elevations on houses that have reverse frontages on Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard shall be m conformance with the revised elevations m Exhibit "H" of the staff report 15) All penmeter walls, and all walls exposed to public view shall be decorative Penmeter walls fronting Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street shall adhere to the approved wall design and matenals palette for Day Creek Boulevard, Banyan Street, and Rancho Etiwanda, including, but not limited to, nver rock plasters Engineenng Division 1) Existing public improvements along Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street frontages shall be protected in place or repaired, as needed 2) Internal streets to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, including but not limited to the following a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees and asphalt pavement, as regwred b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as regwred c) Provide traffic stnpmg and signage, as required 3) Provde sidewalk easement on both sides of Ironstone Dnve A~B~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-104 DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 5 4) Owner of Lot 15 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said lot along Rocking Horse Place Provide mow stnps to separate public and pnvate maintenance areas 5) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 6) Street trees along Rocking Horse Place shall be installed per City Drawing No 1811 7) Landscape Maintenance Distnct (LMD) plans shall be consistent with existing Drawing No 1803-L, including the monument walls at the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street 8) This project is connected to or wdl disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and imgation area Pnor to new construction, a toint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector The existing imgation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction A follow-up inspection of both areas is regwred pnor to the City's acceptance of the new area 9) The City has established a traffiGcirculation improvement fee for the general surrounding development area This development shall participate in the fair share cost distnbution for the traffidcirculation improvements Environmental Mdi_ aq lion 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development), as covered by the EIR certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and the Supplemental EIR and Initial Study/Addendum, as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 26, 1999, and August 1, 2002, respectively 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~}~ ~ lo~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-104 DRC2004-00276 -YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P September 8, 2004 Page 6 BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~~1~8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00276 SUBJECT: 15 LOT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: YOUNG CALIFORNIA HOMES, L P LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-104, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations SC-1-04 ~ Completion Date -// / r / / ~~B1~9 i \planning\final\pingcomm\dre2004-00276std cond 9-6 doc ( Project No DRC2004-00276 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of _/_/_ Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be -/-/- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All stte, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for -/-/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/- all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/~- located out of public wew and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermtng, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/~_ including proper illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/~ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Cary Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 11 Six-foot decoratve block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/~_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoirnng property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect perimeter 12 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along rnterior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 13 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/~- gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limned to, wrought iron and PVC 14 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/-/- 15 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views sc-l-oa 2 ~}E ~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00276 Comolet~on Date • D. E. 16 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and urigation in additton to the regwred street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 17 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers maybe manufactured products Building Design 1 All dwellings shall have the rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street C~ Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 OS 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften then appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent urigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy / / / / -/-/- ~-/- / / / / _/~. -/_J_ / / SC-1-04 3 ~~ ~~ I l Project No DRC2004-00276 Comole0on Date 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained m a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Day Creek Boulevard 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-ot-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located m public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Dmsion 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red H~II Fault, in a standard tormat as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwidrng & Safety Dvision prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes H. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits / / / / / / / / /_/_ / / / / /-/~ / / / / • SC-1-04 ~ A-~ ~~a Protect Na DRC2004-00276 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Rooi Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00276) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bulding and Safety Division 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Buiding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00276) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or motor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Droision pnor to permit Issuance Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordaticn and prior to issuance of building permits / / -/-/- -/-/- -/~- -/-/- -/-/- -1-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-1-04 5 ~~ ~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00276 Completion Date 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through -/-/- Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances -/-/- considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations -/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions -/-/- L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading -/-/- Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to -/-/- perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time -/-/- of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, -/-/- and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for -/-/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cron Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, -/-/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and publtc drainage faalities as shown on the plans and/or tentatroe map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentatroe map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from -/-/- street centerline) 49-55 total feet on Day Creek Boulevard -/-/- / / 40 total feet on Banvan Street - - - 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -/-/- 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the -/-/- final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be -/-/- dedicated to the City SC-1-04 t 6 ~~6~~ Protect No DRC2004-00276 Comvletion Date ~N. Street Improvements All publlc Improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, community trans, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interlor street Improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements requlred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Councll, except that in developments containing more than one bullding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Day Creek Boulevard (e) Banyan Street (e) • Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item fey Existino Improvements to be protected in place or repaired as needed Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, poor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In publlc right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro)ect along mayor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer • ~_/ ~-/- / / -/~_ -/~- -/-/- / / SC-1-04 I 7~~8~-J Prgect No DRC2004-00276 Completion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on ail corners of intersections per City ~_/._ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/~_ 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are requued, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other • variables For additional information, contact the Prolt'ct Engineer S~-,.o4 8 ~ ~ a ~ Protect No DRC2004-00276 Comolet~on Date • • O. Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Stze qty Ironstone Drive Prunus bhre)ana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal FII In Rocking Horse Place Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3' 20 O C 15 Gal Banyan Street Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid- 3' 20 O C 24" Box 'Muskogee' Lavender Background 30 % Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 20' O C 15 Gal Mm Background 70 % Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine 8' 35' O C 15 Gal Mm Day Creek Boulevard ' ' Street Tree Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm 4' 25 O C 15 Staggered B T H Rows On Min or Altemete Match Sides of Est Walk Heights Street Tree Pyrus calleryana NCN 4' 25' O C 15' 'Aristocrat' Staggered B T H Rows On Min or Alternate Match Sides of Est Walk Heights Background Brachychilton populneus Bodle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gal Background Where Room Construction N otes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with c;iry stancara plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutrient deficiencies may require backfdl sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Ciry Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas 2 3 • SC-1-04 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District D~a rr Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40% of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces A signed consent and waiver form to Coln and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 9 ~~ a ~-~- / / -~-~- / / Project No DRC2004-00276 Comolehon Date All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautifjcation Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard P. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas Q. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) jn accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W afar District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval rn the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be recejved from them R. General Requirements and Approvals Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be pajd for the Construction and Demolition Diversjon Program The deposit js fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completjon of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices SC-1-04 10 ~~ ~~~ i / / -~ ~ ~ / / I / / I / / /_ -- . / / / / / / / / _/_/~ Protect No DRC2004-00276 Completion Date ~T. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner U. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- -J-/- SC-~ -oa „ ~}~6~-~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 8, 2004 Young California Homes SFR Tract 16726 DRC2004-00276 & SUBTT16726 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gmdelmes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gmdelmes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m single-farmly residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential project from the pubhc roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Drvision to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project will be calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the requued fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are regwred for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wrthm 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-9Single-family Residential Sales Model homes requue approved Fue Distnct vehicle • access and water supply from a pubhc or pnvate water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application ~ ~~~~~ Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire)Systeins The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Ftre Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants wtthm a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standazd #9-8 All regmred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the pubbc water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporazy utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 3. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dmeway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Public Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 3 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry ~~ ~} ~ 68 I 2 DATE. September 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM William J O'Neil, City Engineer BY' Mana E Perez, Associate Engineer SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR METROLINK RAILROAD/HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS -The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to lower the existing grade of Haven Avenue where it intersects to SCRRA railroad tracks The proposed action also includes construction of a temporary detour of Haven Avenue (approximately 90 feet wide) and the railroad tracks (within the existing railroad nght- of-way), a new bodge for the railroad tracks over Haven Avenue, and realignment of 8th Street The protect area includes Haven Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and 7th Street, and approximately 1700 feet of the railroad track on either side of the - intersection with Haven Avenue The proposed project will not increase the numberof lanes along Haven Avenue nor result in an increase in quantity of traffic. Construction duration is expected to last approximately two years and will be initiated in 2004 Funding for this project is being provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The California Public Utilities Commission will be requested to approve the grade separation and temporary realignment of the railroad tracks The purpose and need of this protect is to improve the circulation of traffic at Haven Avenue and the SCRRA railroad tracks Three structures will be demolished or relocated as a result of the temporary detour of Haven Avenue The structures include winery facilities (APN 0209-131-02) on the northwest side of the intersection of the railroad and Haven Avenue and lwo residences (APN 0209-242-06 and 07) on the southwest side of the intersection of 8th Street and Haven Avenue Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundino Land Use and Zoning Northeast - Vacant land, Industnal Park Distnct, Haven Overlay Distrct (Subarea 6) Southeast - Industnal and office bwldings, Industnal Park Distnct, Haven Overlay Distnct (Subarea 6) Northwest - Industnal buildings and vacant land, Industrial Park District, Haven Overlay Distrct (Subarea 6) Southwest - Vacant land, residential and industrial buildings, Industrial Park Distnct, Haven Overlay Distnct (Subarea 6) ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT METROLINK RAILROAD/HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 8, 2004 Page 2 B General Pla Protect Site Northeast Southeast Northwest Southwest n Desionations - Street and Railroad Right-of-way - Industnal Park - Industnal Park - Industnal Park - Industnal Park C Site Charactenstics The subject site is located on Haven Avenue, from north of Jersey Boulevard to south of 7th Street There is an existing light Industnal/office complex southeast of the site There are several parcels at the southwest comer of 8th SVeet and Haven Avenue that are developed with homes or undeveloped The parcel to the northwest is an abandoned winery with a preliminary proposal for redevelopment The parcel to the northeast is undeveloped, vacant land The pro/ect site is currently a mator divided artenal street vwth a landscaped raised median There is an at grade crossing with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail line dust north of 8th Street The site topography currently slopes genUyand drains from north to south ANALYSIS: General The subtect protect will lower the street and bndge the SCRRA railroad tracks It will include a temporary detour of Haven Avenue and the railroad tracks, a rail bndge over Haven Avenue, and realignment of 8th Street The pro/ect area includes Haven Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and 7th Street, and approximately 1700 feet of the railroad track on either side of the intersection with Haven Avenue The protect is expected to last two years. The protect is expected to improve the arculation of traffic on Haven Avenue and the SCRRA railroad tracks There are structures on three parcels that may be impacted by the protect in the event City Counal deades to move forward with the project A Design Review The architectural rendenngs were reviewed by the Public Works Subcommittee on May 5, 2004 (draft copy of minutes attached), which gave recommendation to staff which aesthetic direction to pursue B Environmental Assessment The City's design consultant has completed an Initial Study and supporting studies (copy sent under separate cover) of the protect and the surrounding properties and found that there could be adverse environmental impacts, that with regwred mitigation measures, will be reduced to a less than significant impact If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order Mitigation for the Pioneer Winery, for the proposed loss of the scale house along with the recommended photo documentation of the entire site has been completed by the property owner, in anticipation of development A wpy of the resolution for the Pioneer Winery's histonc designation, including approval for demolition with mitigation conditions, is attached for reference C~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT METROLINK RAILROAD/HAVEN AVENUE UNDERPASS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • September 8, 2004 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Environmental Assessment of the Metrolink Railroad/Haven Avenue Underpass through the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Respectfully submitted, ills J O'Neil, City Engineer WJO MP Attachments Exhibit "A" -Architectural Rendenngs Exhibit "B" -Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Preliminary Plans Exhibit "D" - Draft Public Works Subcommittee Minutes, dated July 6, 2004 Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Exhibit "F" Histonc Preservation Commission Resolution 04-02, Pioneer Winery ~~ C3 ~~ ILt AY w111111:IIN I III\ \1111\ . vii i ` 1 u nw n.~i unnl .nv uun n. .mi.n \n ~nwi nwi ..n 1 nn 1nn.1 u..~u ni xi i~ni~~imi~i n, nnl. i 1 iwii 1'M 11Y n11111611x IIII\ \14 ~\ 11111\\\\11111 \\11'1 YI I\A v1 ~i ~u•. n n nn,u xx i..n .Anun~i n Hf~'•/C,il ~11'i~l~E'.~I'AI';111~ii1 Conceptual Budge Facade -Stained Concrete Option CrtY 1d liom hu Cui mnonga,CoLlunv.i vin.u in wvni v ii. . X 2 -i i 11 D v ' ui,~l vni nal.unni lviu via EXHIBIT B ~_~ LOCATION °~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION VICINITY MAP e EXHIBIT C g i o ~~~' Y111 ~~ kP$$$~$=~I a o je ~6b~ S: SSEEEE&.~: i ~ + ~y8~e eI ee~~e ~~~ a ''le ~ z6~j~Y ~ I O ~ O ~ I 1 3 ~ iO ~i:~ g ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Y ~ ,. _ ~ I rr,~ ~ i ~~Cl~~ $ t~Y ~IiI~~~~ ~ € I I b i~~@~~6~~~~~ ~ ° l~l~lllll~lllb 1 t-a 133H5 33s 3N17F191 rN 00+86 r15 Ir } ~ ~, 1 , L-b 133FiS 33S ~ ,, ~ 3N17FCI1 rN t I I I ~ ~~ ;,~', _., 00+61 r15 ~ i ~ ~ I Isr~' ~ i i I% ?~' N ~ ~~ ~I ~I ' n ' ~ I ~ r ~~ 13 .m' ', •~i I• ~ :' ~ r P •I I it I, r . 1 r I ~ I I i~~l „~ , ~y..} i I,,,a 1 gg a ~ ~t I ~t p _ "- - i - -- .J.... ( I •x.~• Lp jHylS YDYJV ~~ ~ ~xr ~ .' r ~ me i •~ ~' I I ~ ~+IFII} ~~ ,y~l~~n~~'~ _~' i , ' ,'~p~ ~v;,l. i tl rmn, ~I I I ~~I II+I II, ~. ~ i t'r~~- r, - If ~„ar» ~ d I I I~~'~I, I ai fi, ~ (, ";.;i I ''' ; e ',. II ;, I I I III ~$'~ ~ ,.,',~ ~ Vii, F ~ II ~`,~',I I I '~{~~, I,i ~~'~ ,•• 666 1 i , ' ;, I ~; ~'•I' ; I , iii tip ~ 3NI7FA~~ 13 ~+335Y1 S ~i W o~~ 2 KO ~~C Clo B °~ 61 ~ a t~ 66 ~w MwPiG4illi4~w Q ly l~ ~ytt tc LLL GG G[G t U ~O ~ ' 3~ 8 0o aaoaeeoa~a ' :~~e^ F ~ s ~ <o d iiYg et F- y4 .'„ II ~9:5~ ~ i' r ytltl b C ~T ~ ~~Y6 ~sY3 = 9 i ?q 4 ~ a =~ ~ ! 1 Ys yy ! bg~ ~ ~~~ B a ~~, '~ ~ ~ E m 93$ ~€~~~ g~~ ~ U ~~ I i l l io ~ ~La~$~~~~I~:~tl y'- ~~ l~l~lbl~ ll~lb ~ ~ ~; B-b 133N5 335 3NIlFg1 vW 00+LS v1S _ __~ F _,_ --.-^ -_ - _~ --i y ~ i ' I I Ili - - __ '~i ti;4 I S_ 1 I ~~ ~fl ~~iry Icy' ,~~ I ~1 ~ 1 11 ,$(' ~~ ^p it _ ~_r- : _ ' i~ I I ~II 'III ~ ~ ^ ~~ -~-- It ~_ ~~I~ R ' ~ µ~y 1 !g '~~ ~• ~ ~ 1 I I~ ~ J a .I'II ~ I ~~., ~~ ,~., r 1 p l 1 1 I ~ i IIC l ~~~ ~~~ ~I ~~ ~ -I i I ~ tl ~ ~ l ~ 1 II „~.. '~~~ ~-~ ~ ~l`/~- - ~` y II~y_~~ f_l 1 1 1 I y ' ~Lr~^'~~ Vi'1~ 7i-' nn 1-~_ t~ ._us-~--~ O ~Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ `i I / to _ __ ~__. _.-, -I~ JFae ~1, (( --~~.{-~~~"~~~~ ~I. ,..~ ..u: -- wM ~q I` 1 I I i~ .1f~'I''' ~i~.~ ~ ,. '" - r -der - - ~ e, > n,, , I y ~l - , ~~ ~ ~'T-T,,, :~~~'y~ „ I~ ,_~ ; I st , ; i i i i t+ ''/1N'~~ ~~~ -~_I, i ~i L~ i~~ ~;~~~-, 1 , I / 1 II. r ~ " ~ ~ ~y' Il tab `I it I _ .r' `I- -'V m ,1"=` I I ~~~~II`;p.-„ _,~r, ii ~-- yi ,.. :I l,l i y 11 _ 1_~ ,. I'~ 1 „ „ ~' ~ ~ 111 ~ ~ i f I i' ~~ , i i '•~ ,. ~ , S I M nI .I ~, ..q 2~. .. ~ 1 I' I , ~ a o I I ~~ Iii ~~., I b ly IlH~l vW 00+6t v15 W~~ 9-~/ 133N5 335 ~ ~ ~ ~ pZC 1 _ ~ ~ - 3N17N~1 vW oa+tt vls a ~9-b 133H5 335 ~ aeaaaa_SAA I ~~~&~&~~~1 1 ~ 0 ~~ ' 1 Ff€€€11€€€ I w 1 QQ ~p v ~ Q ! < Z F EE e ~ U $ ~ $ ~ ~j ~' ~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ apppp- _ ~ ~ ~ dd~Y • ~ I ~ O ~ ~ ~ E 8 d;~~ ~~~ 1~~~ ~ I yi j ~~ I 1 j dd g ~ gg @ g ~-'_ ~fl~!!il1116~@9~ i _, ~ ~ alb -s,,o~ = r~ ~ I I . ~ i(lu; »- ..,,, ~~,-~,,.a: \ ~~x~i~„Ai~ I} ~ l~-`jy /F,I ~i~ar11VIY``~'d_ ~ I ~~IIi +~ 1~~3~~~`l /Iy~ lu . ) +__ .~_`~~9, ~1,,..,'a YYyy IG) " .r (;, I ~ . ,.. ` I ~~, ,,,~ innn~C; '^ S _ _- _ ~.:w~~l,{{{ ~{- 1 I ;~IIIII, „_, fffl l'~ ~C~,Ix ~__ -- - _ - - .133M1S 1/191- I I l ~I~III I .r, ~.. ~ Ih rye' -------~,- -,e--~, ~ I I r r ; ;, , ~_° - -----~~ it i yL~411 ~~ ;II . ~ p a l I J I 1 f 13 ~ S I I ~~ - ,~ s~ I{',~, I',il.;Iy{III1p~ I ~ _ ;~Ip,• ~ az u'~f _--' . I i~ luax ~ ~ Iii .~ x~ 1~ Ix~tyl l,~ _ I ~( ~ //' I~'` tl~l' S~''A' jj1 • l ~~ -~ ,~ ~ - 1 J ~- - - ~ ~ ~ ti ,~-oj , ,~1 I f _ - -- ' I _ __ I _ rd ai ,i ,, ~ +... ~~, -.+ II\I - [• .!a l ,~e l , I 1 pYa Y ~. ~ i il -- I' I ~I ~#1( j{ I i III "s:- {llil I I~ 'I i ~ 1 e 1 ! g 1 ~.! _ ~' N K • ~~ . I; I ~ I; ~ .,.,. 'E, s ~ a aeas~a~, . 1,~ ; Z , . I 'I; ~ ~ 1 I. 5 ~a .I ~ ~ , 11 - aaa {~, I ~- I I ., . -- --- „ III Ip 1~ .., '. I I ~~ , II 1 I I I` I ~ ~ II ,~ . ' I ' _ ~ `III , II" I ~ ~ . ` f ` I {I~ ~. I~ ~ 11 S _ ~ 1~_ _ E ~ ~~ .. ~~ Ii ~ I ~ I ~ ~~ Q - - I ' I 't I I ~i 1 I 1 Y - I, ~ , , , ~ - ~ I - - ~ 1 x ' 3NlIHJ1YW OD•CS Y3~~ C•M 133H5 335 b , ~I' I • • • II I . __ _~~ S.D~/<i X91 ---~--~-~ ti •- ~_ __?~ - ------ .. _ I I I --~ ~ =i >\ - _~ \ ~, , f ` C \ I I ~ ~ ~~ ~ i s R p i i _~ . --59 ~ yj l I ~ ~ I i _ k" ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ _ `-_ i4 ~ + _~ .y_~ .si m~ ;' . -_---- . ~ , ~~, ~_ ,--- - -~~ :., = I ,- ~ _•_ j ~'1 ~~ ~~~, --~-- -_-~ --_ i ~ i'_. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a o ~~~ I ~ ~ 9 p 6 •pv ~pp ll q E ~ V t • 6~ ~ q€ ~p x y ~ g96" ~'e ~ ~ ~~B ~ ~ ~~ p Q ~~~ ~ ~Y 4 1 igyy 95 !yy ~~ l d ~ ~ q 5 4yy `~j( ~ pp p!! y p 5 pp ~ ~ ~~ C U U ~ ee 6 g gp 5CC, 9~~ I ! 8 d ~~ vl 1 ~i f i~~r I ' ~ I ~ fl ` - _ ~;, , it ' , ` r..~ I r. ~ ' .I I ~~i' '~ ~ I d '~ ~r ~ =, ~; ~ I '` 1. I ~ ~ i rte= ~y . ~ i t i, ~ =-. -~ ~ ' ^ I , , I,, I- _ f,-, L ~ , InF ; ~~; ~ I ,, ~~ ._~, ~Ir '' Z I' I ~ vi I~7 I fr j;-.;~~ . r it ~ ~' - •I , .. -- I ,I~ .. ~I ;. r~; . ~ i ; ~- _i -~', I `'.~ ' ~ ~i~ _ - I i ~ 1. II i I Iii I ~{u \ ~ ~ I i ~l ~' ' ~~~ Id ~, i --i {~P'j(i I I I I'41 i~ I C 111 ~ti ~I ~ ilj~ Inl I ~ ~ i BIZ i it L III III Q~ . ,; i~, ~' I~-~ T~~ __~ ,~~ ~ill~ N I II ~ j L11 I Y 'K ' r _ _ ~ 4 `~..~~~' 1 ~ , ; ~ IAr r~ ~cq I ix 1 ~6 '•~ ~,~ ffi ~ $ t O ' !' > > ~, ~, ..~ ~•=r---fir F ___-. ~=__- amp ~~ I ~s ~g; EXHIBIT D May 5, 2004 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMNIITI'EE MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Works subcomtnittee was held on Wednesday, May 5, 2004. The meeting was held m the Tapia Room of the Ctvtc Center, located at 10500 Ctvtc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m Present were Subcommittee members• Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams and Council Member Robert Howdyshell Also present was William J O'Neil, Crty Engineer, Robert Lemon, Management Analyst II, Enca Darplee, Management Analyst I B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. June 4, 2003, August 6, 2003, November 2003, December 3, 2003 and January 21, 12004 Minutes approved B2 REQUEST FOR MEDIAN ISLAND OPENING ON FOOTHII.L BOULEVARD WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FOR LEFT TURN ACCESS INTO THE REGENCY SHOPPING CENTER The City Engineer made a presentation regarding the issue of the opening on Foothill Boulevard. The Developer and his engineer were to attendance and avazlable to answer any questions The Subeomm~ttee felt based on the s~gntficance of the proximity of the mall to this protect tt was very important to do anything that would azde the traffic flow at the intersection of Day Creek and Foothill Boulevard The Public Works Subcommittee's feeling was the median opening would help relieve pressure at the Day Creek/Foothill intersection and therefore was able to recommend the developer be allowed flits median break. The Subcorrtmtttee was emphatic this was not to establish a precedent for median openings to Rancho Cucamonga The overall policy is median breaks at non- stgnahzed intersections are to be discouraged However, m this case the ovemdtng impact of the mall and surrounding traffic circulation patterns were such that approval could be recotttmended The Crty Engineer indicated he will follow-up on this issue with the remaznder of the Ctty Counctl by memo and work with the Ctty Attorney to regards to the General Plan Amendment tf necessary ~~~`' ~~o Public Works Subcommittee Ivfinutes May 5, 2004 Page 2 B3. HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION -ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS OF THE BRIDGE The Subcommittee was present with two alternatives (1) a rock cobble treatment and (2) a stain concrete option. The Subcommittee felt the stained concrete option was the better alternative. The Subcommittee felt the concrete rock appeazance was good; however, the stained concrete approach looked a little more classy and more in keeping with the Planning motif along Haven Avenue B4 CAPPI'AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 The Subcommittee reviewed the program and recommended approval. B5. DIS~TRIC (PD 85) OR SC~AI~ AR 2 04~/200~5 NO INCREASE OFASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED B6. ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS I, 2, 3A, 3B> 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED B7, ?,NI~lIJALASSESSMENTWITHINSTREETLIGHTMAINTENANCEDISTRICTNOS 1, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED All three items (B5, B6, and B7), were taken together. They are the annual assessments for the Landscape Maintenance Distncts, Street Lighting Distncts, and Park and Recreation Improvement Distract (PD-85) Staff indicated there aze no increases recommended m the assessment distracts this yeaz. The Public Works Subcommmttee concurred with staffs recommendation ****** C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None ****** CII Public Works Subcomrmttee NLnutes May 5, 2004 Page 3 D. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC . None ****** E. ADJOURNIVLENT The Public Works Subcomrtuttee meeting adjourned at 5:45 P M Respectfully submttted, Wtlham J. O'Netl Crty Engineer Approved: CJ Cia EXHf61T E i DRAFT INITIAL STUDY HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION AT SCRRA RAILROAD TRACKS CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA preparedjor Crty o{Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Crvic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 July 22, 2004 Prepared by /~~J URS Corporation 2020 East First Street, Swte 400 Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-835-6886 Fax 714-433-7701 URS Pro~eci No 29864853 11 ~~ ~ ~ i3 INITIAL STUDY Table of Contents ,~•k. ... 2 INTROD - - UCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTI •• - ... .. - -- ... ..... ..3 .. .--- DETERMQ`1ATION ...... ..... .. ....... ...... .. 4 .... ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST ..... ..... ............ . ...... _ _ 4 I AESTHEITCS ... ... - II ...... .... .. AGRICULTURE RESOUR .......... 6 . ~ °• AIIZ QUALITY - -' " .. IV • .. ...... . .. . BIOLOGICAL RESOUR -- • • •• ... 11 V. ............. ...... . CULTURAL RESOURCES ......... • .. - 13 . • VL . ...... ........ GEOLOGY AND SOILS .... .--• - -• - • • •• . . IS VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................ .... VIII ........ HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ................. .. .... I S .- - 20 . . . IX. .... . .. LAND USE AND PLANNING ....... .. - .... ... .. ... .21 X .. .... MINERAL RESOURCES ... - -- .............. ... XI NOISE ...... .. •--• -- - 7{II ... . . --- - POPULATION AND HOUSIN .......- •-- ••- ... 27 JQII --....... PUBLIC SERVICES... - - ••• • -• - .... .29 - XP/ .. ... RECREATION .. ... - 30 - J(V TRANSPORTATIONrI'RAFFTC .......... .. .. .. .... . . 34 ~{VI ..... UTILTfIES AND SERVICE SYSTEM .. ... ..... .. .....36 7CVII - - MANDATORY FWDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ..-• • -- •• ..... ... . TABLE 1 -PEAK DAY FUGIi7VE DUST AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EXHAUST EMISSIONS N W.m A.mu~Vmd 5wd.'.CEQA CIC~kIst Admen Pafi-0"linoa doc ]/SYS00+ 1 C-~' Determination INITIAL STUDY INTRODUC'T`ION Project Name: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Address: Cooperating Agency: Responsible Agencies: AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Haven Avenue Grade Sepa~i~n°~ T~o~hem Cahfomta Regional Railroad Authonty (SCRRA) City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Ih Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SCRRA City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfomta Public Uhhhes Commission Project Loeatioo: Haven Avenue, from Jersey Boulevard to 7'" Street, Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Cahfomta (Figure 1, Protect Location and Vicinity Map) ProjeM Description: The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to lower the existing grade of Haven Avenue where tt intersects the SCRRA ntlroad tracks The proposed action also includes co~Ytructiliioe ex sung railroad detour of Havrn Avenue (approximately 90 feet wide) and the ntlroad tracks tight of way), a new budge for the railroad tracks over Haven Avenue, and realignment of 8'" Street (see Figure 2) The protect area includes Haven Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and 7 Street, and appro~ t o act will no tmcrease the number of lanes a ong HaventAvenue nor result m an increase m propo Pr ] quantity of traffic. Construction duration s expec ro dedaby therC ty of 1Rancho Cucainonga.lThe tmtiated m 2004• Funding for this protect is being p California Public Uhhhes Commission will b se and needtof this pro act ~ toetmprove the circule ahon f realtgrnnrnt of the raihoad tucks. The putpo traffic at Haven Avrnue and the SCRRA railroad tracks Three structures will be demolished or relocated as a result of the temporary detour of Haven Avenue. There structures include winery facilities (APN 209-131-02) on the northwest side of the intersection of the raihnad and Haven Avenue and two residences (APN 209-242-06 and -G%) on the southwest side of the intersection of 8°i Street and Havrn Avenue Upon cornplehon of the proposed protect, the temporary roadway detour of Haven Avenue will be removed. The former detour areas will be restored to a condition acceptable to the property owner Sitnilarly, the temporary railroad track detour will be restored as acceptable to the SC1tRA ,J ~t1aKn ArmuNn6d S,~dy~CEOA prrtlm A~v~ p1flQ]lVJ~ ~ ••"" Cl5 INITIAL STUDY Determination ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED one tmpac hat s af"Po~enhallykStgntficant Impact' as indicated by the heckh s on thetfollow g pagest ^ Aesthetics ^ Biological Resources ^ Hazards & Hazardous Matenals ^ Mineral Resotrces ^ public Services ^ Utilities /Service Systems ^ Agncultural Resources ^ Cultural Resources ^ Hydrology /Water Quality ^ Air Quality ^ Geology /Sods ^ Land Use /Planning ^ Noise ^ Population /Housing ^ Recreation ^ Transportation /Traffic ^ Mandatory Fmdmgs of Significance DETERA'IINATION On the hosts of this rmhal evaluation. ^ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the envirotunent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION ivill be prepared X I find chat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m ~i cA bMI I,IuGATED iNEGATIVE DECLvARATION will be agreed to by the protect propon prepared. ^ I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an E1,lygtpNMEN'fAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ~ otenhall ^ I find that the proposed protect MAC ~eern~Ponment,lbut~tfi aansto~effectrl) has been stgnrficant unless mitigated" imps adequately analyzed m an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has barn addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on ~~ cltkie sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regmred, but rt must analyze Y effects that remain to be addressed ^ I find that although the proposed protect could have a stgnrficant effect on the environment. because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequatehave been avoided or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIIZ or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further rs required Date Signature (Lead Agen~cy~rRepresentative) /+~ r la-1'I ~I Llh"f~A ~l~.s Wr1~pYG~0Y1 Prrrited Name ~J r1 fr....J L ' s _ H Wnrn A~~\iwul SiuYy1CE0A CLCkiM AEmm pnfiM:OM ~ 1l27R00~ C ~ ~P • t tl t sCern t Los Angeles ~a r /' 1 California 0 0~~`-- ` L 4~ n ll ~ n i~ / Bernardino Probed Location p~~~~ I t A t ~~ -~ ~~, zo o zo ~aw~nlma i '1~1 Haven Avenue Grnde Project Locanon San Bemardmo lime 2003 29864853 Separanon Prgect and V¢mny Map Figure ~ Counry - - --- - -- - C~~- -- -- ----- -- - - - -- --- -- -~ ~ , ~; . ° r s t~ it ~r :. ... t..3s:m:a+ ~.~,' n w t• ;~ a ~'r '/t L r 3 R r\ e' i A - ` - ----~ ~' i .~ v ~ ~ ~ 4: J ,~ + y "7. .+~ ra v c V. i v V rt L 1 f I x X s I!, i C a a c a s ~; -- INITIAL STUDY Environmental Sii Less Tban Significant Potrnhally With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Checklist Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST This checklist idrntifies physical, biological, social and econorme factors that may be affected by the proposed project The words "significant" and "significance" used in the checklist relate to impact determinations associated with potential impacts as defined by CEQA guidelines. I, AESTHETICS Existing Setting: The project site is located vnthin an existing road and railroad tight-of--way, surrounded by residrntial, corrimercial, and open space uses The topography in the protect azea is generally flat and the overall aesthetic semng is not unique. R'ould the pro,/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ ^ Based upon a reconnaissance of the protect site, there appear to be no scrntc vistas along the project altgrunrnt that would be impacted. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scrntc vista. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ~ ~ ^ not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Haven Avenue is not a designated state scenic highway and therefore, the protect would not substantially damage scenic resources c) Substantially degrade the ezasting visual character or ^ ^ quality of the site and its surroundings? The protect is compnsed of a road grade separation pto~ect and is not anticipated to degrade the existing quality or character of the site and its surroundings The grade separation protect is reflected m the approved 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Circulation Plan. Temporary aesthetic impacts may occur doting construction, however, it is anticipated that the visual character and quality of the site and surroundings would be generally remain the same after construction of the protect The visual character after protect implementation would include a new at-grade railroad budge at Haven Avenue and abelow-grade pomon of Haven Avenue at the intersection with the railroad tracks Therefore, the protect would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site a iw.m w.~uewmm s~s0~ a~ ram,.. a,n-0noo~ nix rnv:ow 4 C-q INITIAL STUDY Environmental Sid Checklist Less Than Stgntficant Potenually Wtth Less Than Srgntficant Mtnganon Stgntficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Itrtpact d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ^ ~ ^X which would adversely affeM day or nighttime views in the area? Project construction achnhes would typically occur dttrmg daylight hours so no mghmme glare from construction lighting is anticipated. Ncw streetlights will be installed along the grade separation portion of Haven Avenue and the trzhgned new segnrnt of 8'" Street. Approximately 20 lights will be placed between Acacia Street and Jersey Boulevard along Haven Avenue and 7 lights will be placed along the 8'" Street realtgnmrnt. The location of residences, except for one on 8i° Street aze more than 500 feet downward VThe one remaining re dente on the 81h Street wll be buffered from the tree~hghtmg by ~00 feet and an existing building Therefore, the new light sources would not adversely affect day or nlghmme news m the azea. References: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 General Plan, Ctrculanon Plan Exhtbtt II~ October 17. .~ State ofHagl~W y' S D ~artmrnaoe htanspo~w dot calgov/hq/LandAreh/scetnc/ ahtsyts.htm emc by g ttP~ II, pGRICULTIIRE RESOURCES Exrsdng Setting: The State Department of Conservanon detr•rrmned that approximately 1,300 acres of undeveloped land wtthtn the Ctty is designated as agncultiiral land of some level of significance. However, this does not mean that this land is or has been to agncultittal production, but that they contain quality sods for agnculttiial producnon An addinonal 666 acres of land designated by the State have either been developed or have approved tract maps and are in the process of being developed. The ma]or concrnttahons of designated fartnlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the Ctty (City of Rancho Cucamonga, 2001) In determinrng whether rmpacts to agrrcultural resources are significant envrronmentaJ eJjecu, lead agencies Wray refer to the Caltjornta Agricultural Land Evaluanon and Srte Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Caltjornta Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use rri assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland Would the protect. ^ ^ a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ~ Faztnland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources 4 [ ~~ ~~w NWnm A.murJnnulSwd,~CEQA QclMiAdm~Or,lld]TOW dx 9l!YNIwJ cao INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist ~~ Significant Potentially Wtth Less Than Significant NLnganon Significant Nu Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Agency, to non-agricultural use? The project involves work within existing street and railroad nghts-of--ways, except fora 90-foot wide temporary detour area during construction and the realignment of 816 Street which will become permanent project nghtof--way The temporary detour area will not permanently convert land to a non-agnculttira] use; however, the 8'" Street realignment will result in a permanent conversion of land The Land Use plan map (Exhibit III-1, d oea nPl t-o)f-way d t thpertenanent nghlt-of-away, designated as "lndustnaaParka including the tempo ry gh No impacts are anticipated. Although the State has designated ]ands wit}iin the Ctty as farmland of some level of importance (see Existing Setting discussion above), the City does not map these areas because the Grneral Plan reflects the City's desire to develop the City with no agncultiu-al land designations (Fong 2003) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural nse, or a ^ Williamson Act contract? See Response IIa Proposed project activittes will result to a permanrnt change outside of the project nm~pa s to agricultiual land or lands under Williamson Act contract aze azon patedagncultiira] use No c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ^ ^ ~ ^X which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? See Response IIa Proposed project actinties will result in a permanent change outside of the project nght-of--way to the existing environment, however, the project is not zoned for agncultiiia] use. No impacts to farmlands are anticipated. References: City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2001. General Plan• Chapter N, Managing Environmental Resource. Section 2 1.2.2, Agnculttiral Land Resources. October 17. Fong, Nancy. Senior Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2003. Telecotmnuntcation with K Ellis (URS Coip.) Mazch 4 III. AIR QUALITY ~~ Existing Sening: An air quality assessmrnt for the proposed project was completed by URS Corpontio CE dA Handbook, guidelines provided m the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) Q dated Apnl 1993 Project construction is expected to last two years and it is assumed that two scrapers, one excavator, one motor grader, and two trucks for importing and exporting soil will be required for N YfaaA.eweVn~al Sed+l.'EOw acl~^AMm, IkN-0'130a Ex ilPJlow v cai INITIAL STUDY Less Than Stgmficant Potentially Wrdt Less Than Stgntficant Mitigation Stgntftccant Irk act Impact Incorporated Imp Environmental Significance Checklist construction activthes Construction emtsstons from the proposed protect were quantified and the results are presrnted to Table 1, attached No rnerease to operational emtsstons will result from this protect Therefore, operational errusstons were not gttanttfied m this analysts The proposed protect is located m the City of Rancho Cucamongcarbon mtonox de (CO), and p tcBulate (SCAB). The SCAB is a non-attammrnt azea for omne (O3t , matter smaller than !0 microns (PMto) The closest av monrtotmg station is m Upland. The momtonng data from the Upland station showed that the area has occastonal exceedances of Oi and PMio Where available, the srgnrficance cntena established by the applicable air quality management or mr pollution control d:stnc[ may be relied upon to make the jolloinng determinations. Would the protect. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ^ ^ applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan? The sources of azr pollutant emissions (PMto, CO, Oi, oxtdes of nitrogrn (NO,J, reactive organic gases (ROGs), oxtdes of sulfur (SO,J) associated with this proposed protect aze exhaust emissions from "~ construction egmpmrnt such as excavators, graders, scrapers, and concrete trucks. Fugtnve dust and _ construcuon equipment emtsstons are quantified and presrnted m Table 1, attached The emtsstons from construction activities aze temporary and can be lowered by reducing the construction azea. Thus, eaussttms from the co~h ~~ ~P~~s laze expe utdt to remain t ~e samepbecause no addtttonal ltraffic av quality plan. Op tops will be generated as a result of the proposed protect. Overall, the purpose of the Proed leveltof snernce will reti ult m lower emts ons m the p o ect areaatThe SCRRA railroad tracks. Lnpro tmplemrntatton of the proposed protect would not worsrn the existing av quality or prevent the azea from achieving desired av quality Plans b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ~ ~ a substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? This protect would be located in a region that expenrnces occastonal exceedances of 03 and PM. The types and amotmu of emissions from construction of the protect were calculated and then compared to the construction emtsstons thresholds established for air quality by SCAQMD SCAQMD ermsston thresholds for construction activities arc as follows. 2.5 tons per quarter or 75 pounds per day of ROC, • 2.5 tons per quarter or 100 pounds per day of NO,,, • 24.75 tons per quarter or 550 pounds per day of CO, • 6.75 tons per quarter or 150 pounds per day of PMto. and _~ ._N y ~~ w N Ulam ArmuNnnul S~uOyGFAA OsctlW AO.u PaRVlI0U1 Eoc T~1113'C~+ can INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist • 6.75 tons per quarter or 150 potmds per day of SO,. Less Than Significant Potentially With Sigtuficant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Sigttificant No Impact Impact As shown m Table I, attached, the proposed protect will generate emissions diinng constrochon activities, but will not exceed the SCAQMD emission thresholds for construction activities. It is also expected that the proposed protect will improve the crroulahon of traffic on Haven Avenue and at SCRRA railroad tracks The proposed protect will not increase the number of lanes along Haven Avenue or result in an increase in the amount of traflc. Hence, the construction and operation emissions from this protect will not contribute to any existing or protected air quality violations c) Restilt In a cumulatively considerable net increase of ^ ^ any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? The SCAB is a designated non-attainment for ambirnt standards for 03, PMio, and CO 03 is a secondary pollutant formed through photochemical reactions involving ROG and NOx. PMio is eimtted directly to the atmosphere from sources such as rntrained road dust and combustion exhaust and is also a secondary pollutant formed through photochermcal reactions involving ROG. It u likely that construction of other protects may occur simultaneously with the proposed project's construction schedule However, the proposed protect is small enough in size so that pollutant emissions are not expected to ctimulanvely exceed standards established for pollutant criteria ninon-attainment azeas whrn considering other protects m the vrcimty. d) Expose sensttive receptors to substantial pollutant ^ ^ a concentrations? Construction activities are expected to generate minimal emissions because of the protect sue. Since the construction rnussioru were short-term and below the significant level, rt is expected that the construction emisnons will not impact the sensttive receptors in the protect vicinity There vnll be no substantial pollutant exposure to the sensttive receptors due to the operation of this project e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ^ ^ number of people? The proposed protect is expected to generate some objectionable odors from the rue of tar and asphalt dtnutg construction of the roadway However, these odor irnpacts are considered less than significant in that these acnvihes are short-term and temporary m nature In addition, the proposed project would adhere to the requirements of the SCAQMD rules, including Rule 402 (Nuisance) and Rule 1120 (Asphalt Pavement Heaters) References: n vr~ ~.~eu~.d s~myseon cnatm, nm~m own onaa aM rrsmoo. 8 Ca3 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Sid Checklist Less Than Significant Potenaaily With Less Than S,gnificant M,nganon S,gmficant No Impact Inco,porated Impact impact City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 Grneral Plan Chapter V, Maintaining Public Health and Safety Section 2.1 10, A,r Quality October 17 South Coast Au Quality Management Ihstnct (SCAQMD) 1993 CEQA Handbook April. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The project work hmiss include tudetal, former agnculttnai fields, a htstonc winery facility, and landscaped parkways and parking lots of commercial developments (i.e., office buildings, wazehouses). The project hm,ss and surveyed property ncimty do not support native habitats. All areas have been previously graded Areas not developed with structures are charactrnud as paved, baze ground, or ruderal fields Vegetation, where present, is comprised of annual non-native plant spec,es. The sue supports urban-adapted species and, appazently, some over-vnntering and migratory birds, based on observed species In addition, the vacant loss provide foraging habitat for raptors. Would the project ~,, a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ^ ^ a ' through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? As described in the project's Biologtcai Resoiirces Assessmrnt, other than raptors and nesting buds (which are protected to the State of Californ,a or by the Federal Migratory Bud Treaty Act of 1918), no sensitive wildlife species have bern observed on, or adjacrnt to, the project site or project azea. Because the proposed work lupus and potrnhal staging area arc either developed or heavily disturbed from tilling and grading, the likelihood of sensitive animals nesting or defending a temtory on the site is generally very low. Sensitive aniinal species reported as etnrently or historically cecumng within 10 miles of the protect site include the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly, and Memam's Kangazoo Rat The Fly is restricted to Del}u sands fotmahon present in the Rancho Cucamonga, Colton, and Ontano azeas Survey delineation for potential habitat did not include the project area as known or potrnhal habitat (Psorrias 2001). Sirtulazly, the Memam's Kangaroo Rat is not expected to occur onsite or be affected by the proposed project action. The stuveyed area does not support the necessary native alluvial sage scrub habitat, is not within a over system, and is not within 500 feet of suitable habitat for this species. b) Have a substantial adverse e[fect an an ri arian habitat or other sensitive natural commum'ty identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and ,'A y~ ~~>,~ ~i~.inn.a,~..w.msw,KEOaa~~mnm,.,a,nmzoam~,r~mm9 ca4 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially Wtth Less Than Significant Mitigation Stgmficant No Impact Incotporated Impact Itttpact Wildlife Service? The protect lirruts do not support any native plant habitat Surveys conducted for the protect observed no srnsihve plant species on or adtacrnt to the protect site. Searches were conducted on the protect site for plant and animal species and habitats that have been histoncally recorded from the protect vicinity by the USFWS, CNPS, and the CDFG The site lacks suitable habitat for state and federal listed sensitive or protected species. Because the protect site is ether developed or heavily disturbed, the hkeliliood of sensitive plant species becoming established within the work limas is very low c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ~ ~ ~ ^X protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, bat not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? There aze no wetlands on or adtacrnt to the protect site. The protect would not affect any Junsdicnonal Waters or Wetlands of the U.S. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ~ a native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established Dative resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the nse of native wildlife nursery sites? The property's structures (buildings), mature trees, and fallow fields may support some nesting migratory birds and raptors, which are protected imder the Migratory Bad Tteary Act of 1918. Direct impacts oa these specter may occur if the resoiirces aze being used by nesting birds diinng demohhon and construction. In addition, indvect impacts associated with dust, noise, and vi~brahon may Decor to nesting Mids. To reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance, the following mitigation measiires would be implemented • To the extent feasible, schedule structure demolition and vegetation cleating outside of the active bird breeding season, normally Mazch I to August 31, and as early as Febrttary 1 for raptors. • If demolition and construction activities are to occur diutng the bvd breeding season, then conduct pre-construction bvd nesting surveys mthin the protect area and adtacrnt areas (within 300 feet for protected native buds and 500 feet for raptors). • All demolition and construction activities within 300 feat of an active nest (within 500 feet for raptors) of any bird listed on the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 would be prohibited until tin incidrnta] take permit is approved by the CDFG, or the nest is naturally vacated and the tuvrniles have fledged ^tC1s~ NW,aaw,vuWrd Swd,1CE0A l1d~6¢AmellnfN2IXM doc ]?1ROW lO ca5 _ I1~TITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist less Than Stgrit6cant Poteunally Wtth Less Than Stgntficant Mtnganon Stgntficant No Impact Incorporated Itrtpact Impact • Should structures on the site be demolished, they should be surveyed and cleared of roosting bats pnor to construction activity. A qualified btologtst will be retained to survey for and remove any bats pnor to construction. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ^ ~ ^ a protecting biological resonrces,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? The protect would not conflict with the provisions of any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ^ ^ ~ a Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The protect would not conflict wtth the provisions of any of these listed plans References: - URS Corporation Biological Resources Report, Havrn Avenue Grade Separation July 29, 2003 V. CiJI.TiTRAL RESOURCES Existing Seating: The Protect is located m the ethnographic temtory of the Gabnekno/Tongva, the Serrano occupied the San Gabriel Mountains to the north The Protect area was utilized intensively m the 20'" Crntury for viticulture and an the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery is located within the Protect Area of Potential Effect (APE) for cultural resotuces. Background researched revealed 13 previously recorded cultural resources within 0.5 mile of the Protect APE. The field surveys resulted m the recordation of six cultural resources within the Protect APE two archaeological resotuces (HA-1 and HA-2), three htstonc architectural resources (residences at 10463, 10483 and 10489 Eighth Street), and one htstonc distract that includes both archaeological and htstonc architectural componrnts (Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Distract) (iJRS 2003). Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ~ ^X significance of a historical resource as defined in §150645? The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was recorded as an htstonc distract The Cucamonga Ptoneer Winery Distract was evaluated as potentially eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Htstoncal Resources (CRHR). The Protect involves the demolition or removal of two contnbutmg elements of the *7'fft~+ w.w.~~.~w.,.i swa,'CEO~ch~,~e~a,n.onoa e~rrs:aooe 11 l~ W INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially Wrth Less Ilan Significant Mitigation Srgoificam No impact Incorporated Impact Impact Dismct. the Scale House and Crusher, actions that could cause a substantial adverse change m the significance of an historical resource (The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Ihstrict). However, these potentially significant unpacts will be mitigated to a less than significant level through aubomb~ catttion measures including Historic American Bmidmg Survey (NABS)-level documentation, p azcel and interpretation, and/or transportation of the buildings to another location within the Winery P (URS 2003). One newly recorded azchaeological resource, historic artifact scatter HA-1 (temporary number) will be directly affected by the Protect. The resource appears to be a secondary surficial deposR of various artifacts, prunanly glass fragmrnts, which can be attributed to a 40-year period spanning from approximately 1880 to 1920. However, resource HA-1 does not appear eligible for mclunon on the CRHR under any of the eligibility criteria. Monitoring is recotrmirnded at historic aztifact scatter HA-l. If intact subsurface deposits are detected dm-ing protect excavations, thrn a qualified a ~ eolmo~al should be obtained to properly assess the finds. If the finds cannot be assessed as upo grposure, thrn testing may be requued to determine the resource's eligibility to the CRHR. If the resource is evaluated as eligible for inclusion on the CRFIR, and the resource cannot be avoided through protect redesign and/or avoidance, then appropriate mitigation measures maybe required. b) Canse a snbstanUal adverse change in the ^ X^ ^ ^ . significance of an archaeological resoarce pursuant to §15064.5? Historic arn1 act as m Uga on to reduce potential tmpactstto a less than s gttficant lei elcti(UItS 2003)~g will be emp y The Protect area is considered sensmve for historic archaeological resources, and the potential exists for previously unlmown cultural resources to be found dining construction at any location. Potentially sigiificant impacts to archaeological resources will be mitigated to a less than significant level through sensitivity training, and work istoppagenandhevaluaU~on of mtantrespaed d scovenes of archa~eologrcal resources and human remains (URS 2003). c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ^ ^ ^ ^ resource or site or nnique geologic feature? The Protect area is considered potentially sensitive for paleontological resources. The Quaternary alluvial soils al the site may contain fossilized remains of Pleistocene fauna and/or flora, and potentially fossils from earlier periods. Ground disturbing construction has the potential to impact subterranean paleontological resources. Potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources will be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implemrntation of the following mitigation measur°s' paleontologscal monitoring of construction, sensitivity training, and work stoppage and evaluation of unanticipated discoveries of paleontological resources (IJKS 2003). d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ^ ^ ^ ^ outside of for•nial cemeteries? ~!!~!~ N Wain A.eeeUeud 9Wf~AA Gittkbn Ad,n DnM1OTlODI Ooc T/I]1100, 12 Co~~' INITIAL STUDY Environmental Sid Checklist Less Than • Stgntficant Potentially wtdt ~ Tin Stgntficant Mitigation Stgnt6cant No Impact Incorporated Impact beP~t Ground dtsturbmg construction activity vnll be monitored by a qualified archaeoldo~ sty h~ut ~~ remains are found at the protect site doting earth moving acrivtties such as gra g shall be si,.sprnded and the San Bematdmo County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by Caltfonua law provides for the treatment of skeletal matenal of Nattvc Arrirncan ongm (Caltfomia Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of hitman remains are found m, "A professional Gwde for the Presmation and protecrion of Native Amencan Httman Retrains ~ d03Assootated Grave Goods," published by the Cabfomia Native Amcncan Hentage Corunission (URS References: URS Corporarion, 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Cultural Resources Technical Report. VL GEOLOGY AIVD SOILS Existing Setting: The City is located near two active faults, the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults. The Cucamonga fault a is located in the northcrnriost area of the City and the Red Hill fault haverses they iiil and a orsnble direction. An Algwst-Pnolo Fault Zone was designated m 1981 for the Cucamonga grids, northeast pttensron of the Red Hiil Fault The underlying soils coot[ V~ m~e -bed~t site itys l~ca~ d m an and gravels. According to the Ctty Grneral Plan Slope map (Exh ) Pro] area tvith a less than trn percent slope gradient. Would the probed: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk oCloss, injury, or death involving: a.i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as deIIneated ^ a on the most reeeat Alquist-Priolo Earthgaske Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division ojMines and Geology Special Publication 42. The project is located wtthm an earthquake-prone region. The proposed protect is not located wtthm an Alquist-Pnolo Zone boundary, Per the Ctty Grneral Plan, Exhibit V-1, Fault Hazards (2001). Impacts to people or structures resulting from protect implementation would be considered less than significant because no housing or commercial bwlding structtues are proposed as part of the protect. The Pro owed, temporary and permanent roadway and new bodge will be designed m compliance with trap modern seismic safety standards _.._... rrai..a ~.~u~ s~~,'~o~ oK,iw ,,..~ w.nanou m~ i~ 13 cos I1~IITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist less'IUan Stgnificant Potentially With less Than Significant Mttiganon Significant No ' Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a.ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ~ ~ D The protect is located within an earthquake-prone regron. The project would be designed and constructed in accordance with modem standards and specifications for serstmc safety. The proposed protect would not increase the capacrty of the railroad oz Havrn Avrnue. The protect involves modification of exrsmig transportation facilities and does not include new bwidings that would be cecupred by people. As such, no new or additional exposure (beyond existing conditions) of people to sersrmc hazards would result from the protect a.lii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ^ liquefaction? The soils underlying the project srte have a low potrntial for liquefaction. Hrstonc water levels underlying the srte are shown to be greater than 100 feet below ground surface (CDMG, 1976). As such, liquefaction potrntial is not considered a hazard to the protect The sods underlying the site may have a potrntial for settlement dunrg strong ground shaking. Site specific soil analysts has shown that the upper 50 feet of soils may experirnce a reduction in strength ss a result of strong ground motion, resulting m settlement of the ground surface. Ground settlement will be accounted for dunng final design m accordance with modem swsmic rngmeenng design standards. a.iv) Landslides? The topography of the immediate protect vrcurity is relatively flat terrain that would not be prone to landslides. According to the Ctty General Plan Slope map (Exhrbrt V-4) the protect srte is located m an area with a less than ten percent slope gradirnt The proposed below-grade portion of Haven Avrnue will include slopes. The proposcd protect will be designed m compliance with improved, modem seismic safety standards to minimize the nsk of landslides. For example, the final design may include rtnnirmang of slope gradients, and or installation of retaining walls or structures. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The malonty of the existing proposed protect area is paved or covered over with trnpermeable matenal. The proposed project includes the tearporary detota of a paved street into unpaved land during constnuctian. The detour nghtof--way will be located on property zoned for futtae development, per the City General Plan. The permanent project footprint is similar to the extcting Paved Havrn Avenue nght- of-way and will not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed project tvill not result m substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ~ ^ a a or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral ~~!\!~ NVb,mA.mNetriyd/[:EDA Octfn AEee On6AROW do[ 12IlNM 14 cap I1vITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Srgntficaat Potrnttally With Less Tian Srgntficaat Mruganon Sigatficant No ' Impact Incorporated Impact Impact spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? The site is located on Quatctnary age ailuvtal fan deposits (CDMG 1976). The tmderlyrng alluvial soils consrst of inter-bedded edryroaec~ The geo ogtc unrtorvsotl wil, not become unstableebccause of the support and the propo p ) proposed pro)ect d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- ~ ~ a 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creatiag substantial risks to life or property? The underlying soils consrst of inter-bedded silty sands, sands, and gravels, winch are not considered eatpansive soils (as defined by 2000 Intemahonal Building Colo, Section 1802.31) The nsk for expansive soils impacung the proposed pro)ect is less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ~ X^ of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The proposed pro)ect does not involve the use of septic tanks or altemahve waste water disposal rystems. References: California Ihvtstan of Cal fomra' Srnet~Report 1 3. 1976, "Geologic Haards m Southwestern San Bernazdmo County. ~ Pc City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2001. General Plan: Chapter V, Marntavting Publrc Health and Safety. Section 2.1.1, Setsmtc Hazards. October 17. VII, RAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Existing Setting: In May 2003 URS Corporation completed an Initial Stte Assessmrnt (ISA) to rdrnhfy potential hazards and hazardous materials wrthrn the pro)ect area. The ISA included a visual site survey, a govemmrnt tuords search, and an evaluation of lustonc Lmd use informauon to determine if there rs any hazardous waste and/or matrnals that would trttpact the pro)ect area. The ISA concluded that several hazardous waste generator saes are located umnedrately adjacrnt to the proposed pro)ect study area, no lealang tmderground storage tanks were tdrnhfied within close proxtrmty of the pro)ect area, and no features of an envrromnrntal concern were observed m historic aerial photographs. Pot be ao~hazards related to lead, asbestos, and yellow stnprng on Haven Avenue aze discussed rn Section VII, N J1~,a, A.a.cWmd 5~.d,K.EO~ aaHn Am,e pM-0lroa eoc )RY30M 1 J C'~0 INTTIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Stgntfirant Potrnnally Wrth Less Than Srgndicant Mmganon Srgndirant No Impact Incorporated Impazt Impact Would the pro~eet. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ ~ ^ environment through the routiae transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? The project would not expand the existing transport a]ong Haven Avenue, would not allow for an increase m traffic capacity and would not create a signficant new hazard to the public or the rnvrronmrnt. If hazardous materials are needed far selected construction activities, than rise would be short-term m nature and regulated to rnstire safety b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ~ ^ ^ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? A protect health and safety plan m accordance with the "Caltiaris Construction Hazardous Waste ~y Contmgrncy Plan" would be implemrnted dtinng construction to m,nm„~P potrntial hazards to ' construction workers associated with grading and soil excavation activities Areas of exposed soil affected by project construction would be tested for aerially-deposited lead contamination poor to earthmovrng acnvines. If detected, serially-deposited lead contaminated soils would be collected, tested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with applicable State and federal regulations. Two structures would be acgwred and demolished as part of the project These structrues cvtll requirs analytical testing for asbestos and lead-based paint poor to demolition. if lead and/or asbestos levels regwre treatinrnt and drsposal, a certified contractor will be hired to complete the task prior to demo]ition. These measures would reduce the potrntial hazard impact to less than significant. The project would not expand the exrsting transport along Haven Avenue, would not allow for an increase m traffic capacity and would not create a significant new operational hazard to the public or the rnnronmrnt. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ^ ^ a acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an eristing or proposed school? The only local school m the project vrcinity is the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School (located at 10022 Feron Boulevard, approxiinately one-quarter mile north of the western extrnt of the railroad track realignment activities). Hazardous materials, substances, or waste would be transported and routed m accordance vnth applicable DOT regulations to rnsure the safety of adlacrnt schools and other land uses d) Be located on a site that is included on a list of ~ ^ a ~.S Nw..m~.~.is..a,+~wcsarw,~a.no,maa~-mrmo~ 16 Cal INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially Wtth Less Than Sigiuficant Mitigation SignEfican[ No Impact [ncotporated Impact lmpact hazardons materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? The project study azea is not located on a list of hazardous matenals sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and updated by the Califomta Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) (DTSC 2003). No unpacts would occur. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ^ or, where snch a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the projeM result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project is located approximately 4 miles north of the Cmtano International Aiiport The protect sne is not located vnthm the boundanes of the Ontano Airport Land Use Plan (Zeledon 2003) t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. ^ ^ ^ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The prolcct is not located wit}un the vicinity of a pnvate atrstnp. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ^ ^ ~ ^ an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The project would improve circulation along this portion of Haven Avenue, by bypassing the existing railroad crossing Tcmpoiary mcrcases m traffic congestion would occur along Haven Avenue and ad~acrnt crosstreets may occur dunng construction of the protect. However, a temporary detour of Havrn Avenue would be maintained and open to traffic dunng protect construction Emergency access routes would be maintained during protect construction to ensure public safety The project would not mteifcre with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h) Expose people ar structures to a significant nsk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanaed areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The proposed protect is located to an urbanized environment, nor located immediately ad~acrnt to wildlands, and therefore would not expose people or structures to loss, injury, or death associated with wtldland fires References: **ta C n Il~.rn A.muNnaW SiudnCEOA (lackbl AAwi DM 0)EOOa doc )!2]1200! 17 C...,.. INITIAL STUDY Environmental S Checklist Less Than Srgmfiaant Potrnaally with Less Than Significant Miagaaon Srgmficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) 2003 Hazardous Waste and Substances Site Ltst (Cortese List). As updated May 1, 2003 IJRS Corporation, 2003 Haven Avenue Gnde Separation Inma] Stte Assessment. Zxledon, Rudy Planner, City of Ontano 2003 Telecorimiunicahon with R. Ellis (URS Corp.). Febntary 28 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Existing Setting: in accordance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Boazd, Santa Ana Region National Pollutant Discharge Ehnunahon System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Ihschazge Requirements (Order No R8-2002-0012, NPDES No. CAS618036) Section XV, Municipal Constmchon ProjecUAchvihes, the proposed action will require the developmrnt and Implement a storm wale pol]uhon prevention plan (SWPPP) and a monrtonng program that is specific for the construction protect pnor to the commencement of any of the construction activities. The SWPPP shall be kept at the construction site and released to the public and/or Regional Board staff' upon request. The SWPPP and the monitonng program for the construction protects will be consistent with the requiremrnts of the latest version of the State's General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. Project landscaping will use ezistmg water supply lines. No new water resources writ be required doting opeiahon of the proposed protect Would the pro~ect• a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ^ ~ a requirements? The protect will increase the amount of itripernous surfaces with additional pavement azea in the realignmrnt of 8'" Street to Acacia Street and by adding curb, gutters, and sidewalk along Havrn Avenue However, parkways will be landscaped and the vegetation will help filter runoff from these arras The project would incorporate best management practices, as appropnate, via a SWPPP dlmng constroction along the temporary detour and within construction zones to minimize potential impacts to water quality. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere^ ^ ^ substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-eristing nearby wells would drop to a level , which would not support existing laud uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ii~C Nw..,.evrnue~~m~ds,wyeeo~o~w.~av,u..nnnaaa«tru~mo, 18 C33 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Tban Significant Potentially Widi Less Than Sigmficant Mtngauon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The proposed prolec.t would not directly or induectly deplete groundwater supplies ~r recharge. The existing project tight of way is covered predominantly with impermeable matenals There are no recharge balms or spreading grounds within 1 mile of the project sue c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ^ ^ ^X ^ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? The protect would not substantially alter existing drainage patterns, nor result in substantial erosion or siltahan, as the existing protect tight of way is covered predominantly wuh impermeable surfaces. Site eroston and siltation control meastues would be incorporated into the protect design and SWPPP to prevent runoff from entenng offsite areas doting constiucnon d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ^ ^ ^X ^ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result fn flooding on- or off-site? See Response VIIIc The existing pro)ecoianghtincfrease thecamount of surfacee rtinoffthHowevereathe surfaces. The roadway detour may temp Y rnalonty of the temporary roadway will be removed after protect completion and therefore, the tmpctmcable surface area will increase slightly after protect completion The grade separation slope of Have Avenue may increase the rate of nmoff along the roadway However, the storm water drainage facility at the lowest section of Haven Avenue veil be designed to properly drain the roadway The project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff as to result in flooding. e) Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed ^ ^ X^ ^ the capacity of culling or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? See Response V1IIc. The project would include one new storm diam pipe as part of the drainage plan for the change in grade along Have Avenue The project would not increase sources of polluted runoff beyond those that are existing within the Haven Avenue tight of way t) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ^ ^ ^ ^ The proposed protect would incorporate best management practices doting construction na a SWPPP along the roadway to mimmtze potential impacts to water quality g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ^ ^ ^ ^ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood . ~.~w w ~x..~, n.a~w~w ~~wyccvn cxuia~ ns~ o~n.orzow ax rrzirsao~ 19 C3'~ INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist • Less Than Stgntficant Potentially Wtth Less Than Stgntficant Mmgauon Stgnificant No Impact Incoxpotated Impact Impact Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No housing rs proposed as part of the protect. 6) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ^ ^ ~ ~X which would impede or redirect flood flows? The proposed protect would not place sitl~itbttures5wttwlthmch is based on ooFEMA flood utformation.g to the City General Plan Flood Hazards map (E ), 1) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ^ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? The proposed protect would not significantly tnaease the potential nsk for flooding to the protect azea because tt would not alter the existing drainage capacrty or system No new bwldtngs to be occupied by people would be constructed as part of the protect. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ^ ^ ^ There is no nsk of setche or tsunartu in the protect azea The proposed protect would not stgnrficantly maease the potential nsk to people or structures of tntmdation by mudflow, as no new buildings to be occupied by people would be constructed as part of the protect. References: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001. Grneral Plan, Flood Hazazds map, Exhibit V-5 October 17. IJC. LAND USE AND PLANNING Existing Setting: The City's Land Use Plan (General Plan Exhtbtt III-1) shows "Industnal Park," "Railroad," and "General Industnal" ]and uses immediately adtacent to the protect nghtof--way Land uses within a one-halfmtle of the protect nght-of--way include those listed above plus "Flood ControWhhty Comdor," "Low- Restdenhal," "Medmm- Residential," "General Commercial," "Open Space," Schools," and "Mixed Use " Would the project a) Physically divide au established community? ^ ^ ^ f7'!\n NU4,snA,mmUvW SuM'~FRA UcYIm Minn DnCdlSOW Joe ]R'JSOM ?O C35 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than • Stgmficant Potenually Wtth Less Than Stgmficant Mtnganon Stgmficant No hrrpact Incorporated Impact Impact The proposed protect would matntatn the extsttng use of the protect area and would not result to physical division of an established community b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ~ ~ a regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The proposed protect compnses the grade separation of an extsttng roadway, construction of a cut-de- sac, ashort realignment of 8i° Street, and a tumor modification of the railroad track ahgnmrn[ at its tntersechon vnth Haven Avenue. A preliminary review of the land use plans, policies, and regulations of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga tdenhfied no land use mconststrnctes associated with the protect. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ~ ~ ~ ^X or natural community conservation plan? See Response Nf • References: City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2001 General Plan, Land Use Plan (Exhtbu IIl-1) October 17 I{, MiNFRAL RESOURCES Existing Setting: There are four coalescing alluvtal fans in and neaz the Ctty compnsmg a significant local sand and gravel resource. From west to east these alluvtal fans are known as San Antonio, Cucamonga, Deer Creek, and Day Creek fans The Cahfomta Department of Mmes and Geology have tdrnttfied these areas as regionally significant aggegate resources (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001) Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ^ ~ ~ X~ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? The Cahfomta Dmston of Mmes and Geology has tdenhfied areas of significant aggregate resotrces wtthm the Ctty These azeas are tdenhfied m the 2001 Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Genera] Plan, General Plan Exhtbtt N-1 The proposed project site is not located on or near regionally significant aggregate resources The construction and operation of the proposed Bade separation protect will not result m )oss of a known mineral resource b) Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important ^ ^ *T~C ~t1la.mw,arvellviW ~iudrLEQA Oi¢k4a wEmm DnfiA"/?OM EOC tl1LAW 21 C'JlQ INITIAL STUDY Environmental . Less Than Srgttfirant Poteturally Wtth Srgntficant Mrngahon Impact Incorporated mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specsc plan or other land rise plan? See Response Xa. References: Checklist Less Than Srgarficant No Impact Impact Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. 2001• Genera] Plan Chapter IV• Managing Envtronmrntal Resources Section 2.1.1, Mineral Resoruces October 17. XI. 'NOISE Fxisting Sexing: 1JRS Corporation completed a Norse Study for the proposed project, see Attachment I. The analysts describes the existing Horse rnvtronmrnt m the vicinity of the protect and assesses potential Horse impacts associated vnth the proposed project. The City owns the proposed project site, crn~ ate are caned forAtestdent al and ormne ~ttse.l The hacks. The properties surrounding the propo ~"` nearest resrdennally-caned propertres are located northwest of the intersection, approximately 125 feet north of the exrshng rathroad tracks, between Mature Avenue and Crnter Avrnuc. Other nearby resrdennally zoned properties are located north and west of these properties and are all farther away from the proposed prolec4 The current tram volume along the 8'" Street rail Itne is 4 fraght hams at 55 tmles pet hour (mph) and 32 passrngv trains at 79 mph per day All trams run wrth dresel engines. Would the project result tn. a) Ezposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ~ a ezcess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Coxstruction Noise Norse regulations pertrrrrnt to receivers wrthin the Crty are presented in Secnon 2.1.9.3.3 of the City's Geeeral Plan Table V-3 specifies that the land use exterior Horse standards for resrdrnhal properties are 60 dBA during dre daytime hours of 7 a.m to 10 p.m. and 55 dBA during the mghttune horns of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m Pazagrrph D 4 of the Norse Abatement Secnon states that conshvchoti Horse is allowed between the hours of 6 30 a m. and 8 p.m on weekdays and Saturdays, provided that the noise level does not exceed 65 dBA for more than 15 rrunutes m any hour, 70 dBA for more than 10 minutes m any hour, 79 dBA for more than 5 minutes rn any hour, and 80 dBA at any time. Thrs nrnse level lima rs applicable at the property Ime of any other property The Ctty does not have specrfic regulations concermng the sound level hmrt for construction acnvtty Fxhtbtt V-11 of the General Plan rs a Norse Companbilrty Matrix. Thrs tnatroc states that srngle farmly restdrnha] land uses exposed to Horse levels up to 60 dBA are "normally acceptable" and those exposed to Horse levels up to 70 dBA aze "condrttonally acceptable " N W~ A~ameVoml S~ud,YEOA ChaWa ANm P+t-0ILIW Oz )IS]R001 LL C~ I IrTITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than • Significant Potrnnally With Less Than Signdicant Mtngaoon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The Federal Transit Authonty's Transit Norse and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (1995) provides both absolute and relative Horse impact cntena for transit pro]ects The cntena far Category 2, which includes "residences and buildings where people normally sleep, aze stated in the metnc of outdoor Lm,. The absolute cntena aze shown in Figure 3-] and Table 3-1 and the relative cntena are shown in Figure 3-2 and Table 3-3 of the Manual Dunng certain types of construction activities (i.e., demolition of exishrig paved surfaces and structures), the pro]ect construction may temporarily inaease existing noise levels in areas immediately ad]acrnt to the pro]ect alignmrnt. The URS Norse Study (Attachment 1) concludes that the worst-case noise level generated at the construction site would be approximately 88 dBA Lam, at a distance of 50 feet. The closest residence would be approxunately 100 feet away from the neazest construction activity, winch would consist of the achvuties to temporarly relocate the rarl line It is estimated that the rnhre track relocation effort would take place in 7 to 10 days, much of the realignment is located more than 400 feet from the nearest Horse-sensitive land uses and thus would not result in an exceedance of the City's Horse standards for construction noise. The work occurring within approximately 400 feet would be several days m duration; noise levels from construction activities dunng this pmod could exceed Crty Horse standards without Horse rmhgation. Mitigation measures that would reduce construction Horse levels to less than sigmficant are fisted below. Short-term, temporary exceedances of these levels would oceuu in the event that convrnhonal pile dnving is utilized for the pro]ect. Heavy construction egmpmrnt and operations can create perceptible vibrations at nearby receptors All planned equipment would be located at distances of 100 feet or more from any potentially impacted residrnces dunng construction activities The egwpmrnt may be closer dturrig beef pcnods of transit to or from the pro]ect site, but any nominal vibration caused by movement of the equipment would be damped to levels below FTA significance cntena through 100 feet of ground. No significant impact would occta. The temporary realignment of Haven Avenue to the west would bung the traffic noise closer to noise- sensitive receptors in the area. The centerline of Haven Avenue is currently approximately 720 feet east of the residential azea located north of Humboldt Avenue and 26'" Street; the temporary realigtunrnt of Havrn Avenue would bung the centerline to withn approximately 600 feet of the residrnces The Federal Highway Admimstrahon, Caittans and other state departmrnts of transportation typically utilize a distance of 500 feet as a screening distance for potential noise impacts. Restdences or other noise- sensihve land uses located more than 500 feet from a roadway are considered unlikely to have a Horse impact from traffic nurse. Nonetheless, the estimated temporary increase m traffic noise was estimated Assuiming that the speed, traffic volume, grade, and vehicle mix would not change, the noise level at the receptors would increase by approximately 1 dBA due to the decrease in distance betwern traffic on Haven Avrnue and the receptors The centerline of Haven Avenue is currently approximately 290 feet from the single residence located south of 8t° Street The temporary realignment of Haven Avenue would bung the centerline to within approximately 150 feet of the residence The estimated temporary increase in trafl-ic noise at t}us residence was estimated Assurmng that the speed, traffic volume, grade, vehicle mix and shielding pronded by intervening structures would not change, the Horse level at the receptors would increase by approximately 2 dBA due to the decrease m distance between traffic on Haven Avenue and the receptor * *~C N `NOUee A.euavnuul S,ud~OA CTsckls, AA,m Ikafl-0Y1t1D, d,c ~n]/200, 23 C ~~ INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With less Than Significant Ivlitiganon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The temporary realignment of the tram tracks to the north would bring rail traffic closer to the sensmve receptors. The centerline of the ham tracks is currently approximately 130 feet from the nearest residential area; the realignment would bung the centerline to approinmately 100 feet Under the assumptions that the speed, tram volume, tram length, grade, and commuter/fizight train mix would not change, the Horse level at the receptors would increase due to the decrease m distance between the noise Avenue and Marine Atvenue (the nearestsre ~denhal receptor) would increase by approxtmatelyFl.l dBAt No significant Horse m>pact would occur. The following measures will be incorporated into the protect contract specifications to minimize construction Horse mipacts to a less than significant level: 1. For high-noise achvihes (dumping of ballast matrnals or gnnding/weldmg rail, for example) taking place within approximately 400 feet of residences small, portable Horse bamers should be placed near the noise-producing equipment, between the Horse source and the receptors. These bamers stay be constructed on-site from (for example) 4' by 8' shcets of manse plywood (niimmum 1" thickness) or 1 1/8" T&G subfloar, backed month 3 Y=" thrck R-11 fiberglass insulation for sound absorption. Several such panels may be hinged together m order to be self- supporting and to provide a continuous bamer. 2. weekends or }iolndaysowttlmtol 0 t0 feet off occupied restdrnhal traits without wntten approval of the construction protect engineer. • 3. A]I construction eginpment shall be required to rmnitmu Horse from construction achvihes Egmpment mufflers shall be maintained m proper operating order. Al] egwpmen with local operated in the quietest manner practicable. The contractor ivill be required to comply noise control ordinances. 4. Where practical, sound-attenuatmB fabnc shrouds shall be utstalled and used around the ]tamater/pile impact area of pile dnver equipment dtirmg pile dnvmg. Ale l~ol~ fedleralbeGSA dulled where practical. To the extent practical, contractor shall comply contract noise specifications to limit pile dnnng noise to a maximum sound level of 95 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. 5. To the extrnt feasible, the noisiest operations shall be scheduled to occur simultaneously m the coistuction program to avoid prolonged prnods of amioyance. 6. Matrnal stockpiles and/or vehrcle staging areas shall be Iticated as far as piactical from dwellings. 7. Any public address system operated on the project site shall be designed and adjusted for mmtmum sound levels and mutimum "spillover" of sound onto adjacent properties 8. No music or electronically reinforced speech shall be audible at anoise-sensitive property N U1~.m A~uNMd Sud,'CEQA O¢t4P Ad,w Onfl-0]SOW Eoc ~/~'~~ L4 C~ 1 INITIAL STUDY _ Environmental Sig Liss Than Significant Potentially With Sigtifirznt Mitigation Impact Incorporated Checklist Less Than Stgtuticant No Impact Impact 9. All protect workers exposed to noise levels above 80 dBA shall be provided with personal protective equipmrnt for heating protection (i e , eazplugs and/or earmuffs), azeas where noise levels are routinely expected to exceed 80 dBA shall be cleazly posted with signs stating "Hearvig protection Required m tlvs Area " pQeradon Noise Upon completion of the protect, Haven Avenue would be slightly wider, but the crnterline would retinn to its ongu[al locatron. The increase in noise from Haven Avenue, if any, would be negligible The grade of Haven Avenue would decrease between Jttsey Avenue and Acacia Street, the natural earth bamer created by this grade change would act as a noise barrier, providing some shielding from traffic noise for sensitive receptors facing Haven Avenue The speed limit and traffic volume of Havrn Avrnue would not increase as a result of the protect, and the protect would not affect the traffic mix. Therefore, after protect completion, traffic noise from Haven Avenue would decrease or, at wont, remain the same at the srnsitive receptors as a result of the protect. Upon completion of the protect, the railroad tracks would return to their ongmal location, with no increase in width, speed, tram volume, tram lrngth, or grade, and no change m tram mix Therefore, after protect completion, train noise would remain the same at the srnsihve receptors as a result of the protect. Therefore, no operational impact would result from the operational activities associated with the proposed protect. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ^ ^ ^X ^ gronnd-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? the railroad tra k at HavrnoAvirnuemmay grnerate addi~ ongnalaground--borne vibration or grougnrid-borne Horse See Response XIa. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ^ ^ ^ X^ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The final alignmrnt of Haven Avenue (below grade) will not permanently affect ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity See Response XIa d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ^ ^X ^ ^ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels ezisting withouttbe project? Protect construction has the potential to generate temporary impacts to ambient noise levels m the protect vicinity The mitigation measures listed above in Response Xla will be implemented to reduce• noise impacts to a less than significant level ~~~ ~ ~ NWavm A,mueVa,W S~udyLEOA(]aeklm Admm lxsn4)iWtdoe i/S71EdO~2J C~O n INITIAL STUDY Environmental 5i~ ~~ Significant Potentially With Sigmficant Mitigation Impact Incorporated t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive hoise levels? The protect is not located withm the vicmity of a prvate airstnp. Checklist l.css than Significant No Impact Impact e) For a projectlocated within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ezcessive noise levels? 'Tito protect is not located withm two miles of an airport, nor wtthm an auport land use plan. See Response VIIe. References: Thomas Bros. Maps. 2003. San Bemardmo and Riverside Counties URS Corporation 2003. Noise Study- Haven Avenue Grade Separation Protect. Apnl 30. ~, pOPUI,A7'ION AND HOUSING Existing Setting: As of January 1, 2000 the state Depattirirnt of Finance estimated the City's population at 125,585. From 1994 to 2000, the population mcreased 5.9% This contracts with afive-year population mcrease ulation from 1989 to 1994 Based on build out projections for currrnt zoning, the City's build-out pop lulahori o bout 159,913. Residrnihal butlPd ut is anhcip to ed too of curuafter 2010 d probably before 2020. (City of Rancho Cucamonca 2001) Would the protect: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, ^ ^ ~ ~X either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (tor example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The project would lower the grade of an existing roadway, create a temporary detour for Haven Avenue, and realign the railroad track at Haven Avenue within a developed rnvtronmrnt. No new hotnes or businesses are proposed as part of the project The protect would improve ]ocaliud traffic operations The protect would accommodate existing local traffic demand more effectively and would not directly nor indirectly induce substantial population growth N Vla,m A,eryelmsl Sad,~{EQA Ordh° Aa,m [1nfl °/i°0~,~ iR`u1°Of LV C ~I" ~ INITIAL STUDY Environmental Si Checklist Less Than Stgmficant Potrnnally Wtdt Less Than Stgmficant Mmganon Stgm6cant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? At most two residrnhal structures will be purchased or relocated. Pnor to construction, a Relocation Impact Memorandum wtll be completed to address this Issue, per the Caltrans Relocanon Asststance and Hottsmg Program, Section 10.02.04.00 (Calttans 2002) Any relocated restdrnts or businesses would be entitled to relocation asststance m accordance wtth the guidelines of Public Law 91-646, the Uniform Relocanon Assistance and Real Property Acqutstnon Policies Act of 1970 (a.ka. "Umform Act"). Therefore, the project will not displace substantial ntimbers of existing housing. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ~ ~ ~X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? See Response XIIb. References: California Depaztinrnt of Transportation (Calttans). 2002 Caltrans Relocation Assistance and Housing program Online Manual, Chapter 10. As Revised. October Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga 2001. Grneral Plan: Chapter III, Developing the Community Section 4.3 6, Population Charactenshcs. 7tIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Existing Setting: Fire protection for the extshng protect area is provided by the Ctty of Ranch Cucamonga. Police protection for the extshng protect area is provided by the San Bernardino County Shenff Department. The Cucamonga School Ihstnct serves the protect azea and includes three elementary schools and one tinddle school. Rancho Cucamonga Middle School is located within one~uarter mile of the railroad tracks, on Feron Boulevazd. The railroad track portion of the proposed protect is located ad~acrnt to Old Town Pazk (north of the railroad tracks and south of Feron Boulevard) and Empire Lakes Golf Course (south of the railroad tracks and west of Milhkrn Avenue). a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need far new or physically altered governmental facilities, the *1'r~C~ N U4rrn Arm,~JmW S,uAy-CEQA CbckM Ab,m [M(t-0TJDD~ Eoc 1RL3001 27 c~-a INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less'ILan StgruScant Potennally Wtt6 Srgnilicant Mrhganon Less Tban Srgarficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact eoastrnction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response rimes or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ti ? ^ ^ ^ ^ on Fire protec Police protection? ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^ ^ ^ Schools? ^ ^ ^ ^ Parks? ^ ^ ^ ^ Other public facilities? Fire protection -Emergency access would be provtded per the requirerrtrnts of the Untform Ftre Code and applicable Ctty fire regulatrons. Construction rnatrnals, including waste, would be handled m accordance with Uniform Ftre Codes and applicable Ctty fire-regulauons The project would not result m the need for new or altered facirtes or semces related to fire protection. Police protectan -The project would not affect the potential for cnmes or aceidents, nor would tt require increased levels of police protection. Schools -The project does not include housing and would not result in the loss of existing school facilities. As such, the project wotild not generate the need for new school facilities, nor would tt create the need for physical modifications to existing school facilities. porky _'rhe project poses no potential to result m increased population for the area, would not affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational oppottunmes, and it would not create a substantial tired for new parks or recreational facilities. No nghtof--way impacts to area parks are antiapated as a result of the project. Other Public Factlities - No impacts to public facilmes are anticipated as a result of the project. References: City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1998. http://www.ci.tancho-cucamonga.ca.us/. Cucamonga School Ihstnct. 2002. http.//www.cuca.kl2 ca.uslschools.htm. ~~ sw,.m~.~u~s~w~so~o~m,~o.~em:a.e~ nnmo. 28 C't3 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist LG$$ Than StgntGcant Potentially Wtdt Less Than Significant Mtnganon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Thomas Bros Maps 2003. San Bemardtno and Riverside Counties 7(ry, RECREATION Pxisting Setting: The razkoad track portion of the proposed protect is located adjacent to Old Town Pazk (north of the railroad tracks and south of Feron Boulevard) and Erripue Lakes Golf Course (south of the railroad tracks and west of Milliken Avenue). Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ~ ~ ~ ~X regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The recreation areas adjacent to the project would not be impacted dttnng construction or operation of the protect. The protect would not generate increased use of the pazk (i.e. there would be no new access created for the park nor new park structures built) that would accelerate detenoratron of park factlthes b) Include recreational facilities or require the ^ ~ ~ X~ construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The protect does not include recreational facilities nor require the construction or expansion of recreational factlthes. References: City of Rancho Cucamonga 1998 http //www.ct.rancho-cucamonga ca.us/. Thomas Bros Maps 2003 San Bemardmo and Riverside Counties NVi~vrn nvweVmid s~Wi4CEQn Osctlm nEmm DnA-o)30w da "IRL20M L7 i C'~y INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Thatt Srgntficant Potentially Wtth Less Than Srgnilicant Mrtiganon Srgmficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impart XV. TRANSPORTATION/I'RAFFIC Existing Setting: The proposed protect rs located m the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Cahfomta. The Ctty proposes to construct a grade separation crossing of Haven Avenue at the SCRRA (formerly Atchinson, Topeka and Santa Fe, or AT&SF) railroad tracks Haven Avenue, asix-lane dtvrded artetta] crosses two SCRRA tracks and vehrculaz traffic along Havrn Avenue rs currrntly intemtpted by rail crossing activities throughout the day. The tram crosstgs results in the mtrnuphon m the traffic flow along Havrn Avenue and the formation of vehicle queues as they stop at the crossing until the tracks are cleared with the Passage of the barns Frre, ponce and medical emergency vehicles are also affected by the existing tram crossings as they have to take alternate routes resulting m longer response times The proposed grade separation would eliminate the grade crossing and allow unmtenupted vehrculaz flow along this segment of Haven Avrnue. Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in ~ ~ X^ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at interseMions)? The proposed protect rs a road grade separation project and rs not included wrthrrtt any of the trap grnerating land use categones in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (TCE) Tnp Grneration Manua]. Since the project rs not a trap generator tt will not grnerate new added traps along to Haven Avenue and the surrounding roadway system. Potential increases in future traffic due m part to the attraction to grade separated feature of Haven Avenue and the rail crossing cannot be accurately quantified at this time, as changes in future dnvmg Patterns are pnmanhy based on indrv~dual dnver be}ravtor and preferrnces. Nanethelus, any increases are not anticipated to have a substantial effect on the capacity of the street system. Continuous traffic monnanng of vehicle traffic before and after the grade separation rs suggested. b) Eaceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ~ ~ ~X service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Since the proposed project rs located in San Bernardino County, the San Bemazdino Association of Governments (SANBAG) is the designated Congestion Management Agency (CMA) as defined m the Cahfomta Government Code Section 65089 (t.e ,the county transportation corrintssron or other public agency designated by the county boazd of supernsors and the city councils of a malonty of the ernes representing a malonty of the population within the incorporated area of the county) ~f N V1nm A.n,ucVnnd S,utrnCCpA CMilm Amen DM V'R00~ mK ~/1]/_'~d 30 C'~5 Environmental Significance Checklist INITIAL STUDY Less Than Stgmficant Potentially With Less Than N o Signtficam Mitigation Stgtaficant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact study~ri nseci An existing conditions traffic analysts was conducted at threa ect a d o drag to the o e segments within the immediate vicinity of the proposed gra ep P dmo Cotmty Congestion Management Program (CMP) 2001 B emar gmdehnes set forth m the San P c San Bemardmo County CM f Level of Sernce Standards was excerpted from he n ss p ~ o o wtng d cu lo fol 2001 Update "The CMP level of sernce standazds apply to AM and PM weekday peak-ho o Weekends e traffic peaks occtmmg ra h g ere ave recreational areas such as Btg Bear Lake, w 1 l fi d 7 y M tn Table 2-1 sted as rnce ~ destgnated level of se except those hons t d tl en ersec tn ts an gm se Table 2-1 also shows portions of the CMP system detemuned to be deficient by the 1993 or 1995 of the CMP system identified to Table 2-1 CMP momtonng programs. Each deficient portion ddressed though the deficiency process stipulated m Chapter 8 of t}us doctunent must be a Intersections and segments designated level of sernce F were computed to be F for either the AM or PM weekday peak-hour " "Any facility with a LOS F standard m 1992 .vtll be defined to have exceeded its LOS standard tf more than 10 percent (see Table 2-1) Thts rates b t d y erio e the ntunencal value of level of sernce rovision is included to not permit dismissal of a serious level of servtce problem lust because tt p is at the lowest letter grade m level of sernce " Traffic Analysis The study intersections and roadway segments analyzed witiun the project study area aze wholly within Iiinsdictions of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. The City's uses the traffic study guideline contained m the °CMP Gwdelmes for San Bemardmo County " The current technical grade for the evaluation of roadway level of servtce (LOS) is the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The 2000 HCM defines the level of servtce criteria for the various roadway elements and provides computational methods for esttrnatmg LOS The evaluated items for the proposed protect fall under the categories of signalized and unstgnalized (one-way stop) intersections and suburban arterials and are discussed below p lec twould oc ~dHart~a~e near-term, therefore sextshng traffic ctounts were used m the analysts used Signalized Intersections The San Bemardmo County CMP default assumptions used m the tntersection analysts include signal timing with minimum phase time of ten seconds and amval Type 3 Saturation flow rates of 1,800 vehicles per hour of green (vphg) for each through lane, 1,600 vphg for exclusive tight-tum lane, 1,700 vphg for one lh~ a12it3,paend~j210~~ vg~ic] were also used as defaults m lieu ofactual field data rid . lost time per p N W~sn AvmuAlnnd Siud~^CEQA CMCkhn Admn Dr+ARROW dx '1/1]1300a 31 C 1 r INITIA STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Stgtttficant Potentially Wtth Less Than Significant Minganon Stgwficant No lttipact Incorporated Impact Impact The result of the operational analysts procedures for signalized intersections contained m the 2000 HCM are shown below: • Haven Avenue/Jersey Boulevard (LOS A, AM/PM); and • Havrn Avrnue/7ths Street (LOS A AM, LOS B PM) As shown above, both signalized study mtersecuons are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS B or better under existing conditions. Uasignalized (Oue-~'Vay Stop) Intersections and the re ultant~ltev of s1etvtc~e is LOS B for both AM and PM pe k hours of Havrn Avrnue/26th Street Suburban Arterials According to the San Bernardino County CMP document, the urs 20 & 21rbThe HCM procedure was ~'' were based on the procedures described m the 2000 HCM Chap simplified m the Florida Tables Methodology developed by the Florida Department of TranspoRahon ` (FOOT) and was used as the altemahve Arterial analysts methodo]ogy for the CMP The Florida Tables Methodology presrnts threshold hourly volumes for eshrnaung the peak-hour peak dtrecnon level of ~e proceduee also p ovtdes thee generalized assumpttonsnused toeestablshothreshold toluenes The roadway segments analyzed and level of service results are shown below• • Haven Avenue (north of SCCRA tram crossing) -LOS D, AM/PM • Haven Avenue -south of SCRRA tram crossing -LOS D, AM/PM c) Resnit in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The nearest airport facility vnthin the study area is the One la~~ mtktae main atrpnrt runway ~ Due to the south of protect site measured along Havrn Avenue peril low structure height of the mdmdual protect components (at-grade ntlroad budge and depressed Haven Avenue under crossing), the proposed protect would not alter or change the existing air traffic patterns within the vicinity of the protect site The construction and operation of the proposed protect is not muses of aunh"°fftctrale els. rThere w 11 beano hangevin to ahon hat could pose safety nsksnot result in d) Substancurves or dangerousanters ctions)sorn feature ^ (e.g., sharp ~a • F Y~ r w..~..~iMw s,ud~'CFRn a~xia, ~m,m, ix.ri-0naa ex Tn+s~oe C'~'`~' INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist • Less Than Stgmficant Potrnually Wtth Less Than Sigiii5cant Mmganon Stgmficaat No Impact Incorporated Impact Irrtpact Incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? AD rnnue~eA tempotrarypvehtol~e bypasslowtllHbee onstructed wtthmean approxhmat lyt 125-fooltl-wide altgnmrnt and would have the following features Begrnntng on the southwest quadrant of Havrn Avrnue and 26th Street, the intersection of Haven Avenue and terse ;Sal will ba drovided at Haven Avtrnue/Jerseey Street follow detour ahgiimrnt A temporary gn P The detour continues on a southwesterly, then southerly direction parallel to Manne Avenue then intersects with Humbolt Avenue, the SCRRA tracks and 8th Street Past 8th Street, the detour continues on a southeasterly direction towazds the merge with Haven Avenue rust north of Havrn Avenue and 7th Street intersection Roadway construction-related hazards can be minimized by a City approved Detour Plan in conttnction with the following measures • Speed reduction advisory within the construction zone • • Double fines for traffic infractions within the construction zone • Adequate detour signage and lighting • Advance warning signs, road construction advisory, and dissemination of construction mfoirnahon to the public. Upon completion of construction, the proposed protect would not introduce protect design features such as sharp curves or additional intersections within the protect site, adtacent intersections, or roadway segments The following mtersecnons would be eliminated Haven Avrnue/SCCRA - aosstng will be grade separated Havrn Avrnue/Htunboldt Avenue -Humboldt Avenue will be vacated between Havrn Avenue and Marine Avenue, as the grade separation eliminated tnis at-grade intersectton Haven Avenue/8th Street - 8th Street will be realigned to connect to Haven Avenue at Acacia Street, as the grade separation regwres relocation of this at-grade intersection e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ^ The protect would improve ctrculation along this portion of Haven Avenue, by bypassing the existing railroad crossing Temporary increases in traffic congestion along Haven Avenue and adtacent cross- streezs may occur dunng construction of the protect However, a temporary detour of Haven Avenue would be tnaintamedo ect onstruchon to ensure publiccsafetyctiThe pro ec~ would notsmterfere with an maintained dunng pr t . adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan ~~~ A ~ \Wvrn A,vweVnn W S,W,iCEQA O16klw Anew IhaflA'l30W due rnvzoos 3J C • U INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist u ~1 Less Than Srgmficant Potennally Wnh Less Than S~gntficant Mmganon Srgndicant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact ~ Result iu inadequate parking capacity? ~ ^ No extstmg parking tvtll be dtsplaced along Haven Avenue since on-street pazkmg is ctnrently not allowed along the roadway segment wtthm the study area ~ Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ~ X~ supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The proposed protect is not anhmpated to conflmt wrth adopted pohctes, plans, or programs supporting altemahve transportation. Wtthtn the vtmmty of the protect sue, there are no btcycle racks or other alternative transportation facilities currently m place Dunng the construction prnod, the bus tumour on the southwest comer of Haven Avenue/7th Street wtll not be affected, however, the bus turnout on the southwest comer of Haven Avenue/Jersey Boulevard wtll be temporanly removed based on the proposed detour alignment. After construction, the bus turnout wtll be restored to its current location References: Rancho Cucamonga Crrculahon Element 2001 Rancho Cucamonga Grneral Plan San Bernardino County CMP Update. 2001 Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Calrfomta Governmrnt Code Section 65089 2003 Code of Federal Regulations 2002 Title 14 Aeronaurtrs and Space, Federal Aviation Admrnutraaon Trip Generation 6th Edtnon ]997 Institute ofTransportahon Engineers Fung, Kenneth. Assistant Ctnl Engineer, Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga 2002 Response to 8-21-02 URS Traffic Data Request Letter (URS Corp) 24-Hour ADT Roadway and Peak Hour Intersection Counts 2003 Soutliland Caz Counters XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Existing Setting: The proposed protect includes the installation of a new storm water drainage pipe to be built front the intersection of Haven Avenue and the railroad hacks to 7'" Street Also, the protect may include the installation of new tmgahon pipelines All existing utilities within the road nght of way unit be AWvrn AVrnur`IwdStuEACEOA OecklciAd~m'Onfi-0'11W/dec T2YSOW J4 C~ INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than StgmScaot Potentially With Less Than St>mificant Mmgation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact permanrntly relocated to either the excavated slopes of the Haven Avenue tight of way or within the temporary roadway detow as a permanrnt utility easement Soils excavated dut-mg construction vnll either be reused by the City or vnll be transported to a regional landfill Would the project. a) Eaceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ^ ^ ~ ^ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The protect would not grncrate new sowces of water consumption or wastewater discharge The protect would temporanly increase the amotmt of impcrvtous surface via the detour of Haven Avrnue. However, dtn~ng operation the proposed protect would not substantially increase the amount of impervious surfaces and the volume of swface runofUwastewater production would not bhces diwmgtlconstru non alongtthe conditions The protect would mcorporate best manag pia roadway to minimize potential tmpacts to water quality b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ^ wastewateratreatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? f nepwtwater orswastewater treatmen ct m t a t t fec lines or ion o the constru or result re requ protect would no expansion of cxishng facibties c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or eapansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The project includes the extension of an existmg storm water drainage pipe from 7t° tion of Haven Avrnue and the railroad tracks, approxunately 0.5-miles The storm Street to the water system intersec would gravity dram and would not require the installation of a pump d) Have suircient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Local water supplies aze sufficient to serve construction and landscaping needs Protect operation would not regwre the use of water Should utility relocations be necessary dunng construction, interruptions in domestic water sernce to surrounding properties would be short-term and temporary The protect will not regwre new water entitlements e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment N W ren AmaNm~il Smdy CEpA Chactlm Atlmm the04+2a01 do,' ,rzvzw, .' ~ C5o -_ h' '` TNTTIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than SigaiLcaat Potentrally With LessTtian Significant Mitrganon Significant No impact Incorpornted Impact Impact provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projeM's projected demand in addition to the provider's eidsting commitments? The protect would not generate new sources of wastewater A detemm~ationob~t ae waval Should uttttl~ityt provider that serves the protect areaconsotruchonpamtemtpuonse >~ a~et'+a C1 semce to siirrotmdmg relocations be necessary dutvig properties would be short-term and temporary n Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ^ ^ ^ ^ capacity to accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? Solid waste generated dining protect construction would be transported to a regional landfill or another appropnate solid waste facibty with sufficient permitted capacity. After construction, the protect would not generate solid waste g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ^ ^ ^ a regulations related to solid waste? Solid waste generated doting protect construction would be handled and disposed of m compliance with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. After constroction, the protect would not generate solid waste. References: None. 7{VII, iyIANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Doesthepro~ect ^ ^ ^ a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ^ ennronment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The protect would not have a significant adverse impact upon the resources identified above b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but ^ ^ ^X ^ cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" N Jla.m Avm~NntlW S~uCJKLOA Cl,~ckb, Adrtm daM1-0TSOW der l~y~ 36 C51 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Significance Checklist Less Than Stgmficant Potentially Wtth Less Than Stguficant Mmganon Srgntficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? The project would not result m potentially stgntficant impacts, nor stgntficant cttmulauve impacts, as described m the secbons above. c) Have environmental effects which will cause ^ ^ ^ a substantial adverse effects oo human beings, either directly or indirectly? The protect would not cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, as descnbed m the sections above References: None N Jlartn Arcnue`rx~W Siua~ACCOA Cl~ ~mn, pad-0]_ODa Ox 1~Z1/LW+ J ~ C5a ~~ TABLE 1 PEAK DAY FUGITIVE DUST AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EXHAUST EMISSIONS 'h C 53 A r ^,t e e n E W n 0 ti; m oW a`m of a ~9 mW n ~m°~ ..y o ? /- p mV C9 m n mp ~m = 7 LL O e a° 8 v i `^ W~ ~ a~ ~{ S ~~ ~ ~~ f 4~~~ W m~j <Ob~ ~ ~~~E ~~~ a ~~g~ E iX~##pppOOp ~n9eC~ 9P~~y~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ y~~~~~ ~reag u~Y~3 u5 =sa~s~ CS`~ C~ City of Rancho Cucamonga HAVEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect File No.: 800-2001-18 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the miUgaUon measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom . and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP hachan es et gncom Ilan ede rocedu es a ay Ibbe gnecelssary basedn'tupon progresses, 9 P P recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect The protect manager and inspector, assigned by the City Engineer, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect manager oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Engineering Division) 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C55 Mitigation Monitoring Program 800-2001-18 Page 2 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the project manager 3 The project manager or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 4 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the protect manager or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn 5 Unanticipated arcumstances may anse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project manager or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 6 The protect manager, inspector, or responsible City department has the authority to stop the • work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after wntten notification has been issued 7. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineenng Division 0510 ! i • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: 800-2001-18 Applicant: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study Prepared by: _ Curt Billings, Assistant Engineer Date: Seatember 1, 2004 Archaeolo ical'Resources T ~,,._._-,.~~'~-`,~ '•'r~'-' ~xs~ .~, 9 _ _ - `-~' - j~+j~~, •~ta~ ~ :l _'!?~~~~1.. ~}~~j u •. '~i^~`= 3 } ~~~,, C..: T.`i~' - - WF`et ~~Y ' - ~~6 .. . • - ~aZ3 cA .~. r~ ~~y ~-~. .~~: _; A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving CE C During A 4 construction activity The monitoring will be on an construction intermittent, spot-check basis The City will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is regwred The archaeological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity framing (crew education) as outlined below If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented The archaeological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities CE C During A 4 (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below) They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to then commencement of earth movng construction acbvdies The City wilt be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the protect 1of11 In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during CE C excavation actvities associated with the protect, work shall Dunng A 4 be stopped immediately, and a qualified archaeologist, construction pursuant to the procedures set forth in CEQA Section ' 15064 5, shall evaluate the discovery If the find ~s evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be develo ed in concert with the Ci If human skeletal remains are found at the protect site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work CE C During A 4 shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County construction Coroner's Office shall be notified Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097 98 et seq ,Health and Safety Code, Section 7050 5 and others) Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide for the Preservation and protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods;' published by the California Native American Herita a Commission Paleontological~Resources - _`%~~'~~kr4z,m ~:v~"'*;H' ~a-~w, ~.x~n,~~~~ ~ S ~ tN x1; ;~w~,~ , ;...,~fr ~ „"..a,'-i! A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving CE C Dunng A 4 construction activity The monitoring will be on an construction intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist The City will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required The paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vianitywill be hatted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented The paleontological monitor wdl have the authority to stop andlor redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery_ 2 0~ i • • ... .. . .. . . .... .. . .. . . Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities CE C During A 4 (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological potential for paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources The construction personnel shall also be .informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources (as outlined below) They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities The City will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the ro ect In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during CE C During A 4 excavation activities associated with the protect, work shall construction be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no otentiai to im act other resources Air Quality ~ ., ~ ` , - _ ~ -, 3 ~!~~a~ bi~.~~ , ~. . F~~ „/~e'=~,''~-`rte ~ spa:.;:~,; _ _ .. , ~4 ~ ~., •;~. ., za.•, . ; ~,, " All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CE C Dunng A 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions construction Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 3of11 ,. . - .. ... ~. •, .. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, contractor shall CE/BO C submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed Review of C 2 schedule and protected equipment use Construction plans contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction me asures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance CE C R standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and eview of A/C 2/q coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low- plans pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exce d rt e pe ormance standards CE B R noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 eview of AIC 2 plans All construction e ui t h ll q pmen s a comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of A/C Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the 2/4 fallowing provisions plans • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering plans • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads CE C Review of AIC 2/4 plans • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas CE C Review of AIC 2/4 to erosion over extended periods of time plans Schedule actmties to minimize the amounts of exposed CE C Review of A/C 2l4 excavated soil during and after the end of work periods plans • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance CE C Review of A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineering plans practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by CE C During A 4 the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction r 6 t 4 of, , ~ • ! . ... ... . ... .. . . _ Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind CE C Dunng A 4 speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul CE C trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable During A q means Construction The site shall be treated w th t i wa er or other soil-stabilizing CE C agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Qualit During q q y Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in construction accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical sod stabilizers d (approve by SCAQMD and CE C Dunng A RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas q that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM construction ~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CE B/C Durin AIC alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible g 4 construction The construction contractor shall ensure that construction- CE B/C Review of A/C grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut plans /During 2/4 off equipment when not in use construction All industrial and commeraal facilities shall post signs CE B/C Dunng A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged construction periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) Biological Resources ~ -~.•, ^ s« :~,I ~' '-., '^`;' : "~`t~~:~r~ a-vt~ . ~ ~yy~ x ,~,~ ~- ~~, ..~ni`:r:~ ,_ , ~ .: ] ,:c s 'ica~ +~x'~~Y a4 , Hb J~*1ii Al`... °,.a _ Schedule structure demolition and vegetation clearing CE C Review of A/D 2/4 outside of the active bird-breeding season, normally March 1 construction to August 31, and as early as February 1 for raptors schedule/ Dunng Construction 5 of 11 ., .. If demolition and construction of trees is to occur during the CE C Review of AID 2/4 bird breeding season, then City will have qualified biologist construction conduct preconstruction bird nesting surveys within the schedule/ project area and ail adjacent areas (within 300 feet for During protected native birds and 500 feet for raptors) Only after a Construction qualified biologist has determined the absence of nesting birds would demolition and construction be permitted to begin All demolition and construction activities within 300 feet of an CE C Review of PJD 2l4 active nest (within 500 feet for raptors) of any bird listed on construction the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 would be prohibited schedule/ until an inadental take permit is approved by the CDFG, or During the nest is naturally vacated and the juveniles have fledged Construction Should structures on the site be demolished, they should be CE C Review of AID 2/4 surveyed and cleared of roosting bats pnor to construction construction activity A qualified biologist will be retained to surveyfor and schedule/ remove any bats pnor to construction During Construction Cultural Resources ~ ; , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered CE C Review of P/D 3/4 before or during grading, the City Engineer will retain a report qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CE C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or CE B/C Review of AID 4 graded, divert earth-disturbing actroities elsewhere until report the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor ' should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 6 of. ' ~~ • ... ~. . .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga CE D Review of D 3 Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods r '_ ~• .. _~...~~^.r; ~...a~'_ _, ~ ~ - ~,. ri . ,~,.x;=="~.,i ~ .G , 6'' ~r=.-• ~ t, ' 'r'~~~r,. ,<-~?; " SY q lx. r."'~ ~ ~"*~~* ~y xy:3'-.. ~'~i('~'~"~y~ "A - .- tt:`y'~`.y'`£V'~ t24).. ' r. ~~ . ~^' ~ ry. ~`F _ The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizin r,- =. CE ' ' -~~ .i.G" C s re ~tiX~~.'r~~ Y;S T" ve.~2ji''~`.1.:i1.~`. vL ~ , { .. g agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce During q q PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 construction Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A q schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions construction associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CE C During A 4 exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site construction during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas construction that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hazards-and'Waste~Matenals - , r __- - ~~ :-F ~; rN. . .z-< ; For unknown hazardous waste material encountered dunng CE C Dunng A 4 construction, the procedures outlined in the "Caltrans construction Construction Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan" shall be adhered to A project health and safety plan in accordance with the CE C During A 4 "Caltrans Construction Hazardous Waste Contingency Pian" construction would be implemented during construction to minimize potential hazards to construction workers assocated wdh grading and soil excavation activities Areas of exposed sod affected by protect construction would be tested for aenally deposited lead contamination pnor to earthmoving activities If detected, aerially deposited lead contaminated sods would be collected, tested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with applicable State and federal regulations 7of11 ~, .. Two structures would be acgwred and demolished as part of CE 8/CID Review of AIC 2/4 the protect These structures will requre analytical testing for plans asbestos and lead-based paint prior to demolition If lead and for asbestos levels require treatment and disposal, a certified contractor will be hired to complete the task prior to demolition These measures would reduce the potential hazard impact to less than significant The only local school in the protect vianity is the Rancho CE C During A 4 Cucamonga Middle School (located at 10022 Feron construction Boulevard, approximately one-quarter mde north of the western extent of the railroad track realignment activities) ~ Hazardous materials, substances, or waste would be transported and routed in accordance with applicable DOT regulations to ensure the safety of adtacent schools and other land uses Wydrology and'Water'Quality "- - "- ~ - - - .i_ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~,x`r ~ .rte'°;:~ c~;~;iF ~- = ~ ~ - ° Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W afar Quality plans Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) ihatwill be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE BICID Review of AIC 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining plans coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submdted to the City Building Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit _ _ Noise - = - 8 of s ~ s .. Construction or grading shall not take place between the CE C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including construction Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or radin l g g noise evels shall not exceed the CE C D standards specified in Development Code Section uring A q 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line If noise construction levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Where practicable sound tt , -a enuating fabric shrouds shall CE C During q be installed and used around the hammerlp0e impact area of q pde dnver equipment dunng pde dnwng, pde holes shall be construction pre-dulled and contractor shall comply with federal GSA contract noise specifications to limit pile driving noise to a maximum sound level of 95 dBA at a distance of 50 feet If not practicable, then relocation of severely affected residents during pde-dnving or acoustical treatment of the receptor location should be considered To the extent feasible, the noisiest operations shall be CE C During A 4 scheduled to occur simultaneously in the construction construction program to avoid prolonged penods of annoyance Material stockpiles and or vehicle staging areas shall be CE C Dunng A 4,7 located as far as practical from dwellings construction Any public address system operated on the protect site shall CE C Dunng A 4,7 be designed and adjusted for minimum sound levels and construction minimum "spillover" of sound onto adjacent properties No music or electronically reinforced speech shall be audible CE C Dunng A 4,7 at anoise-sensitive property construction All protect workers exposed to noise levels above 80 dBA CE C During A 4 shall be provided with personal protectoe equipment for construction hearing protection (i e , earplugs and or earmuffs), areas where noise levels are routinely expected to exceed 80 dBA shall be clearly posted with signs stating "Heanng Protection Regwred in this Area " 9of11 -. .. The noisiest construction operations, such as pile-dnwng (rf CE C Durng A 4 necessary), shall not occur between 8 p m and 6 30 a m or construction on weekends or holidays within 1000 feet of occupied residential units without written approval of the protect engineer All construction equipment shall be required to minimize CE C During A 4 7 noise from construction activities Equipment mufflers shall construction be maintained in proper operating order All equipment shall be operated in the quietest manner practicable The contractor will be required to comply with local noise control ordinances For high-noise activities (dumping of ballast materials or CE C During A 4 grinding/welding rail, for example) taking place within construction approximately 400 feet of residences, small, portable noise harriers should be placed near the noise-producing equipment, between the noise source and the receptors These barriers may be constructed on-site from (for example) 4' by 8' sheets of marine plywood (minimum 1" thickness) or 1-1 IS" tongue-in-groove sub floor, backed with 3-1/2" thick R-11 fiberglass insulation for sound absorption Several such panels may be hinged together in order to be self-supporting and to provide a continuous barrier Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours CE C During A 4/7 of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, construction or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday During the construction period, the bus tumout on the CE C During A 4 southwest comer of Haven Avenne/7th Street well not be construction affected, however, the bus tumout on the southwest comer of Haven AvenuelJersey Boulevard will be temporarily removed based on the proposed detour alignment Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res onsibleiPersop , = w P - m ~M~iilfiir,In~a~~Ne c <~~n, ,U ~ ~9,,x 91'~Y~. ' " ~Mia3f~d" ~^s?~r .=''~ ` ,;-es"~~' ~~C , ;;, ~ (r~~' ,i;'-s ti ~S~n~'t~7iF~'-s?~`;-•i'~ ` ~' , CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWdion B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Greding or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Ocwpancy BO -Building or designee D - On Completion paste Submittal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order ~ 10 ofd ~ PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chiaf or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citation i \engdesgn\perez_prolects\haven ave grade separation\01 b eir\monitoring plan\mmchklst-rev7-04final doc n /"' "7" 11 of 11 City of Rancho Cucamonga • NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: 500-2001-18 Public Review Period Closes: September 8, 2004 Project Name: Metrolink Railroad/Haven Underpass Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Protect Location (also see attached map): Haven Avenue, from Jersey Boulevard to 7thStreet, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Project Description. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to lower the existing grade of Haven Avenue where it intersects the SCRRA railroad tracks The proposed action also includes construction of a temporary detour of Haven Avenue (approximately 90 feet wide) and the railroad tracks (within the existing railroad right-of-way), a new badge for the railroad tracks over Haven Avenue, and realignment of 8th Street The protect area includes Haven Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and 7th Street, and approximately 1700 feet of the railroad track on either side of the intersection with Haven Avenue The proposed protect will not • increase the number of lanes along Haven Avenue nor result in an increase in quantity of traffic Construction duration is expected to last approximately two years and will be initiated in 2004 Funding for this protect is being provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The California Public Utibhes Commission wtll be requested to approve the grade separation and temporary realignment of the ratlroad tracks The purpose and need of this protect is to improve the circulation of traffic at Haven Avenue and the SCRRA railroad tracks Three structures will be demolished or relocated as result of the temporary detour of Haven Avenue The structures include winery facilities (APN 209-131-02) on the northwest side of the intersection of the railroad and Haven Avenue and two residences (APN 209-242-06 and -07) on the southwest side of the intersection of 8th Street and Haven Avenue Upon completion of the proposed protect, the temporary roadway detour of Haven Avenue will be removed The former detour areas will be restored to a condition acceptable to the property owner Similarly, the temporary railroad track detour will be restored as acceptable to the SCRRA FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ~]X The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this . proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment Glog i r~ ~J If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The protect file and alt related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Seotember 8 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By cc~q EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO 04-02 • A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2003-01048, DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERY A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0209-131-02 A Recitals 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Histonc Point of Interest as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Interest is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 28, 2004, the Histonc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public heanng on the application 3. All legal preregwsites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred F B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, d is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Histonc Preservation Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct 2 The application applies to approximately 9 65 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 8812 Haven Avenue 3 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic heanng on January 28, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24 090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the follo~nnng findings and facts a Histoncal and Cultural Significance Findina 1 The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an histoncal penod, type, style, region, or way of life FacUs The winery represents the agncultural penod of the Cucamonga region, and relates to the livelihood of many residents Findina 2 The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality FacUs The Hnnery was owned at one time by Garrett and Company, one of Cucamonga's prominent winenes The cooperative involved several significant families within the Cucamonga region, including the 11 Thomases, DeBerards, Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers C ~~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 DRC2003-01048 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . January 28, 2004 Page 2 Finding 3 The proposed Point of Interest is connected Huth a business or use, which was once common but is now rare Facts Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines detained and the region began to be subdivided by developers Fact/s• The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own Hnnery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, togetherHnth all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Histonc Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CE~A guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared Commi sionflhas reviewed and cons der d the informationnconta ned in said Mit gated Negat vie Decaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Histonc Preservation Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative DeGaretion for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Histonc Preservation Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2 24 080, Section C 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code The "Histonc Point of Interest' designation is merely recognition for historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations, the Histonc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of Histonc Point of Interest DRC2003-01048 . contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures (~' ~'~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 DRC2003-01048 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 3 Environmental Mitigation Cultural Resoun;es 1) The property owner will place a plaque at the protect site descnbing the histoncal importance of the Pioneer Winery 2) The property owner well conduct two oral histones for individuals that were connected wrath the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery A maximum of $2,500 per interview will be deposited wrath the City Planning Division pnor to issuance of a demolition pennd 3) The developer budding any new development on this property will inGude an interpretive art and architectural component This component shall be processed as part of the Development Review Application 4) Pnor to issuance of demolition permits the property ownerwnll complete Histoncal Architectural Budding Survey (HABS) Level III documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contnbuting buildings wnthin the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery Distract An expenenced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important extenor and intenor features of each structure The photographs record textures, odet~tten wordPatAn relationships not easily conveyed by drav~nng archival-quality deliverable including wntten reports, black and white large-format photographic punts would be completed The onginal documents and one single sided reproduable copy shall be deposited wrath the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center 5) A professional archaeologist wnll monitor earth moving construction activity The monitonng will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis The developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor wrath the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is regwred The archaeologica c ew1teducationd as on-site cultural resources sensitivity training ( ) outlined below If previously unknown subsurface cultural matenals are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures descnbed below well be implemented The archaeological monitor will have the authonty to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery 6) Pnorto the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources The construction personnel shall also be informed of G-~-a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 0402 DRC2003-01048 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 4 procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below) They shall be cautioned not to collect art'rfacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological mondor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities The developer will be responsible for notifying the archaeological momtor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. ~ In the event archaeological resources are unearthed dunng excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City 8) If human skeletal remains are found at the proiect site dunng earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroners Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by Califomia law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (Califomia Public Resources Code, Sections 5097 98 et seq ,Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others) Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide forthe Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Assoaated Grave Goods," published by the Califomia Native American Heritage Commission 9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist The developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required The paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered, construction work in roceduresidescribed belowewilltbe and the emergency discovery p implemented The paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery 10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources (as G~-'J HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-02 DRC2003-01048 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 5 outlined below) They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsrte paleontological morntor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered dunng the course of construction The paleontological monror shall administer supplemental bnefings to all new construction personnel, pnor to their commencement of earth mowng construction activities The developer wall be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to worts on the protect 11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed dunng excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate viGnity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource Dunng the evaluation penod, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. 6 The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. HISTnRIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• ATTr=a i Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Colemado here' b cert fy that the foregoingPReso ution a dullysand~egularly nit oda sect, Cucamonga, Y passed, and adopted by the Histonc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Histonc Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of January 2004, by the follownng vote-to-Hnt AYES COMMISSIONERS FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS McNIEL L'.~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect Fde No.. Histonc Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 progresseshachanges eto mcompl anted procedures emay abbe gnecessary Abased Itupon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its coresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. All momtonng and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request atthe following address . City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C~5 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2003-01048 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists wtll be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provde appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 as omp sled by the p o ect plannePor respons ble rCity departhment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mrtigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Cary staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. g. In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actiwties at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. U ~' ~P MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01048 Applicant: Paul B. Hofer III Initial Study Prepared by: Lori Shriver Date: December 2.2003 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Cultural"+Resource`s~^-~;;,;; ~ _ ~ '~`~5 , Z The property owner will place a plaque at the protect site CP D Rewew of A 3 describmg the historical importance of the Pioneer concept material Winery for plaque The property owner will conduct two oral histories for CP B Rewew of report D 4/7 individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer W mery A maximum of $2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit The developer bwlding any new development on this CP B/C Rewew of D/C 4l7 roperty will include an interpretive art and architectural concept plans omponent This component shall be processed as part of the Development Rewew Application Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property CP B Rewew of plans D 4/7 owner will complete Historical Architectural Bwlding Survey (NABS) Levei III documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing bwldings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HAGS level photographer will use large- format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure The photographs record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word An archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic pants, and measured drawings, would be completed The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center 1 of 4 . . . . . . . . . . A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving CPBO B Prior to on-site D 4!7 construction actrvdy The mondonng wdl be on an activities intermittent, spot-check basis The developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor rf any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is regwred The archaeological monitor wdl conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below If previously unknown subsurtace cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented The archaeological monitor wdl have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction CP/BO B Prior to D 4/7 activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), construction II construction personnel (including management) shall activities e informed of the cultural resource values involved and , of the regulatory protections afforded those resources The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below) They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the on-site archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activates The developer wdl be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the protect. • •of 4 In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Protect, work shall be stopped immediately and a quaiified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064 5, shall evaluate the discovery If the find is evaluated as signd~cant under CEQA, further mitigation measures wdl be developed in concert with the Cdy CPBO -. C Throughout construction activities D .. 4/7 If human skeletal remains are found at the protect site CP/BO C Throughout D 4/7 during earth moving activities such as grading or construction trenching, work shall be suspended and the San activities Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (Californa Public Resources Code, Sections 5097 98 et seq , Health and Safety Code, Section 7050 5 and others) Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide for the Preservation and Protection f Natroe American Human Remains and Assoaated Grave Goods," published by the California Native American Heritage Commission A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving CPBO B Prior to D 4/7 construction activity The monitoring will be on an construction intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate actvities by a qualified paleontologist The developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitorwith the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is regwred 'fhe paleontological monitor wtll conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity wdl be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below wdl be implemented The Qaleontological monitor wdl have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unantlapated discovery 3 of 4 ~ .. ... -. . - . Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction CPBO B Prior to B 4/7 activities (Including initial grading of vegetation removal), construction all construction personnel (Including management) shall activities be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities The developer will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the pro)ect in the event paleontological resources are unearthed CP/BO C Throughout D 3 during excavation activities associated with the Pro)ect, construction work shall be suspended in the Immediate vicinity of the activities finds, and a qualltied paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource. During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to Impact other resources. Key to Checklist Abbreviations !HY o• }'-W 'Us8Y5i ~'iY15 S S p C ersoi~ ~ ~ ~v° w ~';? ~~ Responsl6le P ~.Y *i+~'l` A"$A.TN1 -0~~.F.YARt t N~ onltorlr~g;F uer cy ; ; ` e S d } h4 Ij9f etor3(o~1)~le a~ ~N~ l# ~ '43ViF. Y lkt - ~rdtS pn•'A~^~S*'~'~ J/+n 1 anc~Iofis ~; « ~M~'~ ~ ~ a;~ ; ~ ;* ; ti ~; ; ~:; 3f ; ~ ~, ,~ ,~ . , ~ ~ ~ . r g , ~ , c J t , ~ , , ~ ,,, W CDD -Community Development Director or designee A • W ilh Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - Cily Planner or designee B • Prior To Construction B • Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 - W Ithhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C • Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - W ithhotd Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bulding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Orcler PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP FC -Fire Chief or designee 7 - Cdabon • ~f 4 • T H E C I T Y O r .K ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 8, 2004 TO Chairman' and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 7,600 square foot BJ's Restaurant 8 Brewhouse on 2 acres of land within the General Industnal District (Subarea 12), located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Pittsburgh Avenue - APN 0229-263-48 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300 This action has been determined to be within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004, and no additional environmental notice for the discretionary actions pertaining to the proposed protect is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 BACKGROUND The site is a part of the master plan DRC2003-00770, which included three 4-story hotels and four restaurant pads, approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Industnal bwldings/Industnal Park (Subarea 12) South - 4th Street/City of Ontario East -Vacant land/Industrial Park (Subarea 12) West -Vacant land/Industrial Park (Subarea 12) B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industnal Park North -Industnal Park South - 4th Street/City of Ontario East -Industrial Park West -Industrial Park ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES September 8, 2004 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The site is vacant and contains no trees The frontages of the site are improved with curb and gutter D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided BJ'S Brewhouse 7,600 1/100 sq ft 60 121 and Restaurant 1/55 sg ft 30 _ Total 90 121 ANALYSIS A General The site is a part of the recently approved master plan DRC2003-00770 for three 4-story hotels, which are as follows Courtyard by Marriott, Hilton Garden Inn, and Hilton Homewood Swtes There are four restaurant building pads (which wdl come under a . separate entitlement) that front along 4th Street This 7,600 square foot protect is the first restaurant to request design review The elevations of the buldng are richly designed to reflect the ambiance and character of the proposed use The architectural materials consist of a brick header course and large mural, decorative light sconces, cornice work at the corners and main entry way (which fronts 4th Street), spandrel and vision glass, canopies, and a detached silo A Conditional Use Permit is required because of the proposed sale of alcoholic drinks for on-site consumption B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on July 6, 2004 The Committee was pleased that the applicant had addressed the many mator and minor issues The Committee recommended approval subtect to working out the remaining issues with staff C Technical and Grading Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Committees on June 1, 2004, and was approved by both Committees All issues have been addressed and are included in the Standard Conditions of Approval and in the attached Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment On May 12, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Development Review DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300, of which "the proposed master planned protect" and impacts were addressed in Initial Study Parts I and II with associated mitigation measures that reduced all impacts to less-than-significant The adopted Negative Declaration was circulated for public review in accordance with the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code No further environmental review or notice is required va PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES September 8, 2004 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-00243 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval Respectfully submitted, Brad City Planner BB DF\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Draft Reso - Site Plan - Landscape Plan • Bwlding Elevations - Floor Plan - Design Review Committee Action dated July 6, 2004 ution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-00243 D3 naarvooz •••••, __•.•.. «•~ ___""_' ~ ON JaO umn.~xon+ao o~oxn ~~~.~ e.,,~ai'a ., our „o s3mwss.~axonron rnunx frvW 3115 ~/ U ' - 1 a E a ~ ~ e $ ~E: E dl e`> 3 i¢ F 5pg € ~ a s A !~ y ~PS !Qp 4 OY i~ d e s P 9 { f N ~{ Ei ® ~ N i - { e d P ~ 1 3 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~il ~ i~ f ~ e 4 { 5 6 } Y` §+~ f a ~ ~ f}, ~ ~ t Y ~~ ~ ~ E ~ ! ! ° ~ Qe erg[ ! ~3 34 pq (6 @~ d [ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~lY~v 1 ; r _ i : ~9~4ss i( ~~ F t5 s ~ ! ee ~~ F~ [ ~ ~ { e 1 ~ { i 9 {: i P ° { S { i e!{ ~ ~3 €a 1 d ^a a ^oooo^oao©ooo ooo®o©©ooo©o ~ W o00000o af! C ~6a:`-~u..~n I~ r- >~ o 3 5 4 ! ~Ep P v~-i Y6. {6 j iyl" tt 1 ~ E 6 9 gIS °~€ E ~ _ 3Jtild ONOWI-IJIM 6 ~ g! ( s e ( ~ -,, ~_ -- i i i, e s ~ -'- - _~ d ~-O YY~ tl 9~i }~36 E {{l~lP~f! d G ~ ~ e i ~~~ tli i r ~ ~~ ~o ~'' ~ ~ ail ,, O :~ ~ i f r~ Ylr, ^ 1 ° e 'sla~ ~g PI j+tspsS3s~ ~ iyi d9~€ 7 ft~q 4 YEE of4 ~ . + I ' • ~ a(7 ~ i ag e ~. ~ Iii ; I~ ~ Y { E eEt}[r {i {3. g ~Y~gee C ~ Y°`v Z ~ ~ 4 ~ 1 , E ' - - ~ - y~ ~{Ij! FR ySl9sEEyFp~P;~ 9 ~, ~~ , i-.n .~~~r ~ -__ 1I ° o cy ~ o ;I ~, a d ~ e {e ~ee =d 'pi S~gg3{~ ,E6pE,{g ~!i~~!i~B 1632!! I ¢o- - s Y n .I I i - . -o III 1 V , ... _ {4 4 ------------ _ ( p QQ° ~ i +-~ r I --yl~ I F' o ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ rJ ( II ® ® ®' ® ~ ~ I~ I W ii I W • ~ ~ q I ? q ~ 'I ; V , _ ~~ ~ " '---------~------ { ® ~ 4 Eo r5 .~. -0 t J. 1~~ ~ 7 y ~ ., I~ I: I i ~ F I i ; , ~ ~ I I~ I l I 1 7 I I ®I I I [1 6^ I, e~ r II I h P i ~ I ~ a t r' ,' vvv._va..,u~•-wvvu~~uu vuvvuuu vv_+av.a~vvvvuu v,~u~~ ,(J 1 ~ 0 I ;~ _. I ~~'! I ~/~/ '' ~l J ~ ,~ ~ PLANTING PALETTE ' s~+ SYMBOL BOTANIUL NAME COMMON NAME T~RR ! ~P6 s ~ L oP I F0.A HOLOT0.ICHA'MOMINE' MORAINE ASH ; ~~ 1 Ei y _ ~~ _ _ _ QEDRBU TRL SHADFMASTER SHADE M/STFR HONEY IONST pp I 1 ~ ~ t MNNL j~N ~RF ~ / ~ MFULEUU QUINQUINERVN CNEPUT T0.EE ~ ~ 6 ... 4 ~ ~ i { ~ I mMT~id~eELlA~rexAn 0 / PIATANUS ACERPow STUMORE i ~~ 6 oHm saRAR 555 PATMHT ~ ~ ~~ _ t ~ ~ ~ s PRUNUS CERASIEERA RIRRf IFAF PLUM i d I ~ ~ ~~ n I - - 1~ U Tlw CORDATA LITTLE IFAF LINDEN ~ < _ ~ I VUZ _ a ~ gSZoSZ I Z WASMINLTONM ROBUSTA MF%IUN FAN PAw ~ ~Olj` I _ v` p l ~ ~ 'i-~o - t~ V ShWTa Ga.vlcmv ~ ~~~ ` ~ [ _ _ I" BAR S~15fAR R URf% COMNJS NFW ZEALAND HAI0. SEDGE 1 OIETFS VEQTA fORTMCM LILY ~ ~ HFOFAA HELIX 'MINNIA DWARS NY ~ r ® HFMFROCAl05 SPECIES DAT UlY ® LIRIOPE GIWNTFA LILY NRF 1 ® ~ C` MTRTIS COMMUNIS BEOl1U BFOTIU T TGE IRLF M9.YeKA OLIRVLIRBMI MUHIfNBgCM RIBFSCENS SOif BLVE Mf%IUN MUHIfNOERQA ® RNNLSETUM SET iUBRUM R1R%F FWNIAJN C0.A55 3 u I 1~i ® PHORMRIM TENA% NFW ZEALAND fLAM `` U> • ROSMARINUS OTF P0.051RA1'US DWARF ROSEMARY tF --- ----- , y_ TMCHD.OSPERMUM ASUnG IDO ASMPC IISIM NE I "-~vWi" ~;Z• ~ ~ "=%n 1~K~~ VIBURNUM TVRIS UURUSTINVS i e.~•~~ ~~~` qT',';-°~ FNRATHONB TVRf I 8` W ::'i> Yom,?=~.d ~~ ~-.. I Em sTREn slRmsvn la INIRr ATTDIT na f .~n ~• ~~ 4TH STREET ~~ NOTES ^`° ~~ NI PROPOSED WIDSC.VF MEAS 51Wl Bf YRIUTFO WIMAfULL AUTOMATED ABLUTION $YSiFM M1001 MCORIpAIFS IHf MOST EfP1OFIR ANO WATER CONSFRNNC fQU1PAOET AIID PRACPC6 THE RRIUIION SYSTEM SHALL BE DFSIQIFO TO MEET AND gCIID THE REQUIREMENTS OF 1HF STATE WATq EETICIFNCT MODEL ORgNN1CF fOR WMq CONSFRVATgN n... SGLLF Y.LB L.1 ...«._~.~._. s~____~~. ~ [KWYNL rtrelMeS ~~ ox Ana aw n vaw~nn~ aa.+~e wauvnte wmtA - a- ~ ~°~ ~ ~ w U~ M ° ~~<, li ® 531vU055v OuOI~rv]n 11n10rv f 6 ~ ~ 4 ~ '(~ f s ! ~ g~ 4 4 i 8 za r t i~ B B i~ @ @x 3~ t (~2 z O ~ va a p )1 @~ H ~ j~3@3~~f g0p -- ~ ` _ "' W @ ii y @ i R 23 H p 9 ii 9 iH y' i e f i R W ~ ~ o00 oooa oo ®©oooao ~~ ~ r - -- - ~ _. p0 3 o---- ~ E o- _ -_ -__ e o e o n en ~ ~ p 9?P p : R e 8 I e @ @ i ~ E p ~ ° ~ ~ p e E a ~ ~ i F f SS y 6 1 9R~ R p F~ ^ I e 1 y ~ ~ E 1~64RR Rae:~9iR~i 6' ? _ i s i ~ ~ o ^ooo©oaoooa® 0 % - g e pp e ~- ~ ~ 6 ' RAP i~iRi u y x 6 ~R ~E~ - ~9 ~ e~E q ' ,~ n r}.pii~3p ® v ~ ~ p ~ y9ippp°5335i gag i i e ~ _ 3~ p Fp'' 9 Di ~ I i ~ R ! Y Hp.E ~ Iipf~sR~ °s f E c-0 (__Y ; ~ 'RED ° ~*FeP9K4 ~- i ~ ~ p 1 pv2H i i~{~H!@SfP 3 6 , . E o0 0o aoo .. ~ JI yi v ~ .Y.'-. .~. ~N~~YYn 1 - E f 1 iy 1 ~ e i p f'. !p ~ ( ~ :Pi'H 3 ~ i _ ~ of ` ~ tR i ~ - 5 E ~ .~ E - ~ ~ ~ i° yH t ~ : RR il i --- ~ i~ ia ii; ~ $ ~~ A a y~ I s51 ! o- )) I ~ _ _ G L. CM ~f£ _ _ .f H ~ R4 6 ¢s i + _ f - , $ i. ~ i 0--- E s ® ® E~3 U ~ © _ ~ i iis~ P 0i~ ~i 3p f 9 Y H i i 9 i S w } ' Q t 1 ¢ , >> !! e ~~ `~ ~ ya r "t pr 7 I~ Q e~ V '3 >' ex° &~ y F O Ou g R ! p f i a ~ ~ 49 i~ y =' R = ~r ~ < yy 9 yy 3 Rp ii pp 4i it / /~ -~ ~ , ® ® o o pJ Q Q 4 , Q ~ ~~ . - ... __ ,fag `I - _i ~,I :, [ a~ g t .. .~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~Z~ ~ _ ~9TRJ Ri.T P.fREc 11QUffi T_ ,~I{ f ~" i ~ ~ II I . D ,~ I I, ,,a ~ ~$ as SOUTH ELEVATION ~ f I _ I i I i I ~ 3 = ~ { Q ,r ~ i '~ i ~- ~ --' - --- 3 z - _ _ - -- - - - - : R ' `_ F~ ~] 1 o-ar.®r,aue~.~s.a ; ®lat•.•„ro-a®~sffi '- ~ ~ ~~ , °-- -- i:i s ~ ~~ -mgr ~ I!~~ e ~, ~ ~ i ~ m ~ _ ~ -,.... --- ~ ; _ ~ a~ -r -' - - -~~ I o -~.. ~ ~ c EAST ELEVATION ° 3 ~ M ATERIAL /COLOR KEY KEY NOTES ~ ~"`~ ~~ _ ;'...,...,.,.. O v m : © ~ m., a o 0 p....~,~..,.„,_.m.o... . . . .,.m.....,,, o,~. __.._,,.. 0...-..e.~_, ~ o~_,,..e.,.ea. o CR•4 o..,,,.M._....._.,Am,.,n ... ®-.-, p+.. REV ...r _ ...,..,..e'-___._.._• nzoorooc n. r mss ~ \ orr Ana +~~ oo~w+. zs..z xi. refl. irvu uooa l LJ SLnJO55v Ox03MM lTUnx .ii,~~jj;:. - ~a ~ q ~pQ _~ ®_ ~®~ I _ _ ~® ., ' S I - ~o - - ~ - - - - I I ®rl ~ Ia, -~ J ~ ~® j° I - - -~- --® I I - T~ ~_ fi--j- e~ F~ 0 /~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 40 p m Doug Fenn July 6, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00243-NUTTALL-UCHIZONOASSOCIATES-A request to develop a 7,600 square foot BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse on 2 acres of land within General Industrial District (Subarea 12), located on the north side of 4th Streei, east of Pittsburgh Avenue - APN 0229-263-48 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300 Desion Parameters The site is a part of the recently approved master plan DRC2003-00770 for three 4-story hotels, which are as follows Courtyard by Marriott, Hilton Garden Inn, and Hilton Homewood Suites There are four restaurant bwlding pads (which will come under a separate entitlement), which will front along 4th Street and total 22,111 square feet. This 7,600 square foot prolect is the fvst restaurant to request design review The elevations of the building are richly designed to reflect the ambiance and character of the proposed use The architectural materials consists of, a brick header course, and large mural, decorative light sconces, cornice work at the corners and main entry way (which fronts 4th Street), spandrel and vision glass, canopies, and a detached silo Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this prolect The applicant has done a good lob of addressing staff's earlier recommendations, athe following are some further recommendations that would give the prolect a enhanced and polished look 1 The detached silo should be walled with a brick base that is at least four feet high This should help keep children and teenagers from climbing on the support poles of the silo 2. Provide a decorative frame-like structure (brick) around the mural The applicant forgot to submit elevations in the submittal packet for the north and east elevation The north-south elevation is mislabeled as the north elevation. The elevations on the south and east should reflect the richness and variety of the north elevation 4 Extend the decorative vertical brick and cornice element above the roofline 5 The west side of the building where the metal seam roof is located should have metal support rods to mimic the canopy over the primary entrance Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the prolect design without discussion 1 The following inconsistencies with the Sign Ordinance should be resolved a There is a maximum of three wall signs (one per building face) or two wall signs and a monument sign Five wall signs are shown ~~B~T ..E.. ~9 DRC AGENDA DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES July 6, 2004 Page 5 There is a maximum of one wall sign permitted per building face Two wall signs are shown on the south elevation facing 4th Street Delete "Restaurant Brwhouse" from the entry canopy The maximum wall sign area is 10 percent of the buldmg face, not to exceed 150 square feet 2 No signs will be permitted on equipment, such as the silo 3 No exterior downspouts are to be visible on any of the buildings 4 Landscaping should surround the trash enclosures 5 Parapets are to be high enough so as to screen all roof mounted equipment The warehouse areas of the bulding do not appear to have sufficient parapet to screen any HVAC units. 6. Transformers should be screened by decorative wall material which matches the architectural material of the building with landscaping m front of the screen wall. 7 Ail freestanding lighting standards should be the same as the light standards for the entire master planed protect Staff Recommendation Staff recommends redesign of the protect and return as a Consent Calendar item Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant presented revised elevations that addressed the identified issues in the staff report The Committee reviewed the revised plans and recommended the protect be scheduled for City Planner review ~)~ RESOLUTION NO 04-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-00243, TO DEVELOP A 7,600 SQUARE FOOT BJ'S RESTAURANT & BREWHOUSE ON 2 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 12), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET, EAST OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-263-48 A ReGtals 1 Nuttal-Uchizono Associates filed an application for the approval of Cond~onal Use Permit DRC2004-00243, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subiect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng to consider the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September 8, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the north side of 4th Street, between Pittsburgh Avenue and Richmond Place, and b The site is surrounded by mdustnal/office uses to the north, vacant land to the east, 4th Street and the City of Ontano to the south, and vacant land to the west, and c The application proposes the development of a restaurant on 2 acres of land, and d The subject property is a part of the master plan DRC2003-00770, which included three 4-story hotels and four restaurant pads, and was approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004 e The application contemplates the manufacture of fermented alcoholic beverages and their sale for on-site consumption • f The subtect property is located along 4th Street, a mator artenal street, and across from the Ontano Mdls' restaurant row, which includes several sit-down restaurants featunng beer, wine, and hard liquor, such as Olrve Garden and Chevys ~) ) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-105 DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES . September 8, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on September 8, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds and concludes as follows That the proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district m which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements m the viGnity 4 On May 12, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative DeGaration for Development Review DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300, of which "the proposed master planned protect" and impacts were addressed in Initial Study Parts I and II with associated mitigation measures that reduced all impacts to less-than-significant The adopted Negative Declaration was circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Decaration 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission adopts the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) No entertainment is approved by this permit Any entertainment, as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Chapter 5 12, shall regwre separate application and approval of an Entertainment Permit Enameenng Department 1) All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No 04-53 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300 shall apply 2) Prior to the issuance of budding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided . to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division pia PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-105 DRC2004-00243 - NUTTALL-UCHIZONO ASSOCIATES . September 8, 2004 Page 3 within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect Environmental Mtigation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted on May 12, 2004, by the Plamm~g Commission Resolution No 04-53 for the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Development Review DRC2003-00770 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16300, which included this proposed pro/ect 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-00243 SUBJECT: BJ'S RESTAURANT & BREWHOUSE APPLICANT: NUTTALL-UCHIZONO LOCATION• NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET, EAST OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Plannrng Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-105, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations all Conditions being commenced thereon ect site or business activit f th / / , y e prot 2 Prior to any use o _ _ _ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ ~~ I Protect No DRC2004-00243 Completion Date D. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwiding Code and -/-/~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be -/-/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~-/- consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _J~- other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detatled on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _J~- bythe City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties S Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~-/- the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~- located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- • family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~-/- mcludtng proper dlummation 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _J-/- homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of buiding permits Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, -/-/- tree-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City _J-/- Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project) _l-/- b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to -/-/- include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins -/-/- d Roll-up doors -/-/- e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids -/-/~ f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis -/-/- ZUJS Project No DRC2004-00243 Completion Date g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area hghtmg fixtures, budding hghtmg fixtures (exterwr), and parking lot hghtmg fixtures 6 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved bythe City Planner prior to the issuance of bulding permits E. Building Design An alternative energy system is requued to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating Details shall be included in the bulding plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main bulding colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet G. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the requred automobile parking spaces W arehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number _~-/_ ~~- -/-/- _/~- -/-/- _/~_ ~_/- ~~_ -/-/- ~~- _/~- -/-/- -/~- / / 3 ~) ~p Protect No DRC2004-00243 Completion Date H. 2 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/~ non-residential development 3 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus _/_/_ shelters shall also include an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ___/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/~_ stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ~_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of bulding ~ 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner revew and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Diwsion 10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 4th Street ~ 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 4 Q~-~. Protect No DRC2004-00243 Completion Date 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits J. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verrfy the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 4 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Division priorto final occupancy release of the affected homes 5 Mitigation measures are requred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following Site/Plot Plan, Foundation Plan, _/-/- / / ~-/- _/~_ _1-/_ / / -/~- -/-/- ~~- / / 5 ~~O Protect No DRC2004-00243 Comoletion Date c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (I e , SUBTT #, SUBTPM#, DRC #) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City pnor to permd Issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~~- 5 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~_ Bulding and Safety Dwision 6 Developers wishing to participate In the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~_/_ contact the Bulding and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requrements M. Site Development 1 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant ~_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 2 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public ~_/_ counter) N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/~ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/-/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ s -Di9 Protect No DRC2004-00243 Comoletion Date . O. Grading 1 Grading of the sub Standards, and a conformance with 2 A soils report sha perform such wor 3 A geological report time of application 4 The final grading submitted, and ap permds APPLICANT SHALL CO COMPLIANCE WITH THE P. Security Hardware lect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading ccepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial the approved grading plan II be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to k shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the for grading plan check appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, proved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding NTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices O. Windows • 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner 2 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 3 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars R. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibdity 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department S. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . SEE ATTACHED -~-~- -~-~- ~-~- _/~- _/.~- ~-/- ~-~- -1-~. -~-~- / / ~~- / / -~-~- / / 7~a O RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS April 26, 2004 BJ's Restaurant & Brewery Mission & Pittsburgh DRC2004-00243 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelmes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire. hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At mtersecUons ni On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 150 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflect a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances gal 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed pro)ect may be used to provide the required fire flow sub)ect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on ad)acent • property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all pro)ects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits wdl not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed pro)ect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 All dunking and or droning establishments that exceed an occupant load of 50 per local ordinance 2 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered . FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system If the number of sprinkler heads exceeds 100 the bulding must be monitored FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fve Department Access -Fire lanes Standard #F191 10 200 Location of Access All portions of the structures is' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet • d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches 2paa f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent • h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width • When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet Gates are not required to be motorized Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan rewew FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Candles and open flames in public assemblies Compressed Gases . Public Assembly 3 p o'Z 3 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application . Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distnct The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino . To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adtacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners • Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The 4 'Day L agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Prvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwiding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivenng any combustibles framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and v~ntness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fir hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamong Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 5 ~a5 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for truction C d t F ire ons o hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitte Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler montoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler montoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subtect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercal and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subtect bwldmg or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 11 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of ail devices and bwldmg features as requued in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 6'po~(p • A ~ C M O C U C A M O R C A Staff Report DATE September 8, 2004 TO Chavman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P - A subdivision for condominium purposes of 18 54 acres of land related to the development of 467 residential condominium units in the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18 Specific Plan), located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue - APN 0210-082-47 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00505 On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan BACKGROUND On October 24, 2003, the City Planner conditionally approved Development Review DRC2003-00505, fora 467 multi-family apartment complex and a 29,571 square foot retail center on the subfect property PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Professional office bwlding and vacant land, Mixed Use (Subarea 18) South - 4th Street, Mixed Use (Subarea 18) East - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 12) West - Apartment Complex Land, Mixed Use (Subarea 18) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use East - Industrial Park West - Mixed Use C Site Characteristics The northern portion of the property is under construction for development of 467 multi-family units and the southern portion is under construction for retail IIEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P September 8, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The applicants propose the subdivision of the 467 multi-family rental apartment complex into condominium, "for sale" units Because of the accelerating housing prices m our city and the surrounding communities, this proposed subdivision would be beneficial to the community and in the spirit of the affordable housing goals of the City's General Plan housing element Staff believes that this will be an opportunity for first-time homebuyers the option of owning a residence B Design Grading and Technical Committees The affiliated Committees recommended approval at their meeting on July 7, 2004 The Committees determined that, with the recommended standard and special conditions of approval, the protect is consistent with the City's standards and ordinances C Environmental Assessment On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan The California Environmental Quality Act provides that once a Program Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Program Environmental Impact Report CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to ail property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16972-1 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respecttully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DF\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" -Tentative Tract Map 16972-1 Exhibit "B" -Design Review Action dated July 6, 2004 Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for SUBTT16972-1 i ~a !• VN ~~ W o ', ~ ~~! T a 11. O z ~~ ilk H Z S :~'I: Qa~~~l; ~ Q g fy H ~ ~ ~ I~ g~ i,~ .ti~ (J ~;i 4 L=. `C .l ~_~_~ eec iiiuou a! !I t 1 !! ! 1 ! SSSIII!II 9 fff99yf99 1 eeeeeeeeeeeeeem a ~y uuu.auuua y i 9?19!1l99i; ~IlS 1 9±uuttu__~___ Is~ ~eag~ `I[-- alI ! a if Ta f f f6{ I 41, 1ll;g II'' ~~ II% I~{ ~' E Ills F L }a t s II 6I,,.iii. 1~~,~ iI~ '!~! il:! 9'~ ~°I~~ 9p i E'C I ai°! ~ '•`! ~ ~ ¢ ~f!~ ~ 1!f ! ti i ~~ ~ ~ lj~B~ !I ~11: °iI ~li~ jQi~ II: iRll91 ` IIi~I811~IgIlIE6 y ~ f $I~~tii! I'ellll illl II~II 11 ~ #4:e1 3 :III ill Ilil liil III 9 911111 nly_y_a-e_._e. ~I I 1 ® ~ ~ ~,~ @ ~ . d 5 S 3 ~ z S, ~ [S ®i ~ / ~l DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Doug Fenn July 6, 2004 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P - A request for a condo map related to 467 multi-family apartments on 18 54 acres m the Mixed Use Distract (Subarea 18), located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue - APN 0210-082-47 Related Fde Development Review DRC2003-00505 On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 18 The applicant proposes the subdivision of the apartment complex mto condo units Because of the accelerating housing prices in our city and the surrounding communities, this subdivision propose will be beneficial to the community and m the spirit of the city's housing element m our General Plan Staff believes that this would be an opportunity for first time homebuyers with the option of owning a residence Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission C_J u ~p(~I ~ l ~ ~, ~, J E4 RESOLUTION NO 04-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16972-1, A SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON 18 54 ACRES IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT (SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0210-082-47 A Rentals 1 Jefferson on Fourth, L P filed an application for approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16972-1, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public heanng for the above-descnbed map and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September S, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The subtect property is within the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, and b The subject site is under construction of multi-family apartment units and retail, and c The application proposes to subdivide the site into 467 residential condominwm units, and d In October 2003, the City Planner approved Development Review DRC2003-00505 for 467 multi-family rental apartment unds e The proposed subdivision would create 467 condominium ownership unds consistent with the following goals and objectives of the General Plan Housing Element i To provide "a vanety of housing types for economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group " u "Allow and create opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types, maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units, and provide suffiaent numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations " ui "Provide opportunities so that 30 percent of the persons employed in the City may live in the City " E~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-106 SUBTPM16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P September 8, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b That the design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and That the site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e That the tentative tract map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f That the design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 On June 1, 1994, an Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 93102055) was prepared and certified by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Speafic Plan The California Environmental Quality Act provides that once a Program Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Program Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the pnor Environmental Impact Report, together with the wntten and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision is within the scope of the pnor Environmental Impact Report There are no substantial changes in the protector the site or its surrounding conditions that would regwre revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~g Division 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planrnng Commission Resolution No 03-166 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16245 shall apply 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Elv PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-106 SUBTPM16972-1 -JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P September 8, 2004 Page 3 BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS E~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16972- SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: JEFFERSON ON FOURTH, L P LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a _/_/_ complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • SC-1-04 i planning\final~pingcomm~subtt19672-l stdcond 9-8 doc T g Protect No SUBTT16972-1 Comoletron Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced wthin 30 days from the date of damage 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the . Engineering Division E. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of ali mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Crtyto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits / ~ / / ~-~- _/_I- ~_/- -~-~- / 1 ~-/- SC-1-04 2Q i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt19672-1 stdcond 9-8 doc E -I Protect No SUBTT16972-1 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condihonmg, and g Planning Division Pro/ect Number (i e , SUBTT16972-1) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/~ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Droision H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the pro/ect file number (i e , SUBTT16972-1) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new residential pro/ect or ma/or addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-1-04 i \planninglfinal\pingcomm\subtt19672-lstdcond 9-8 doc ~ )~ Protect No SUBTT76972-1 ComoleM1On Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) •. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provde compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed J. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check • 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califom+a registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ SC-i-oa / / / / ~-~_ ~~- -/~- ~_/- ~-~- ~_~- -~-~- -~-~- a i \planning\final\pingcomm\subtt19672-1 stdcond 9-8 doc E I' RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 24, 2004 Jefferson on 4th 4th & Milliken Condominium Conversion SUBTT16972 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets, drive aisles, and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1s` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are deemed obstructions • 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnwng surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption dewce The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications . b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch ~-a c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adiacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate • d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset 4 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please prowde a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building, or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino . To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessors parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, tum radu, and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adjacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please prowde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County . of San Bernardino 2 t~~ RCFPD Stan PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 2 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested, and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested, and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must • be recorded with the County of San Bernardino 3 ~~~ 9 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&Rs, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 10 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, individual dwellings units shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background Multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 13 Fire Emergency Guide: The owner of the buildings or their agent must produce a Fire Emergency guide for Multi-Family Dwellings in accordance to Standards # 13- 2, which must be reviewed by Fire district personnel and approved Upon Fire Distract approval the Owners and or their agent must distribute a copy of the approved guide to new owner of each unit ~1 4 Ei5 ancho l:ucamonga Staff Report DATE September 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2001-00154 - HP,RMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to construct three light industnal bwldings (Building "A" - 6,274 square feet, Bulding "B" - 7,312 square feet, and Building "C" - 7,222 square feet) on 1 46 acre of land in the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street -APN 0209-013-15 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16769 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN -The proposed subdivision of 1 46 acre of land into three parcels in the General Industnal District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street-APN 0209-013-15 VARIANCE DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to reduce the bwlding and landscape setbacks along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue on 1 46 acre of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street -APN 0209-013-15 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink), Flood control channel, and vacant land, Flood Control (FC), and General Industnal (Subarea 2) South - City of Ontaro, vacant East - Flood Control Channel, and vacant land, Flood Control (FC), and General Industnal (Subarea 2) West - Industnal Buildings, General industrial (Subarea 1) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -General Industnal North - Flood Control /Utility Corndor, and General Industrial South - City of Ontario East - Generallndustnal West - Generallndustnal ITEM F, G, I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00 1 54 AND DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 2 C Site Charactenstics The site is severely constrained by its small size and shallowness This infill site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line The site is approximately 6 feet below the adjoining BNSF Railroad (used by Metrolink) to the north The site slopes to the south with a fall of less than 2 percent To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south, across 8th Street, are residential condominwms, to the west, across Vineyard Avenue, is a bar and automotive repair uses, and to the southwest is a small stnp commercial center D Parkino Calculations The total requred parking for the project is parked per parcel, per Development Code Regulations129 stalls, with a total 170 proposed parking stalls The protect is in conformance with the required ratio of parking stalls ANALYSIS A General The project contains three small sized buildings, which range in size from 6,274 square feet to 7,312 square feet, and are similar to other industnal buildings along 8th Street The buildings are rectangular shaped, which is conduave for the intended use Access into the protect site is off of 8th Street Additionally, the applicant has provided an outdoor employees' area for the project The stucco buildings include decorative details, recessed reflective glazing, metal seam . roofing, fiberglass molding around windows, multi-colored paint scheme, and slate tde accents at the entryways Building "A,"which fronts the comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, has a tower element When you consider the existing development in the area, this protect will be a mator architectural improvement The General Plan designates this comer as a gateway that should feature an Entry Monument in similar Mission Removal forms and cobblestone walls as the existing Archibald Avenue/4th Street gateway designate this intersection B Subdivision The project also has an assoaated parcel map for each budding and assoaated parking The subdivision was mistakenly filed as a tract map and must be re-advertised as a parcel map The parcel map will be brought to the Commission at a later date C Variance The purpose of a Vanance is to provide flexibility from the stnct application of development standards, however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve the request The following are facts to support these findings Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code Facts The applicant has requested flexibility with the required bwlding and landscape setbacks along both street frontages The small area and shallow depth of the site is similar to nearby properties on 8th Street, for which the Planning Commission has granted setback variances 2 Findin That there are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district +-,~, N a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT . DRC2001-00154 AND DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 3 Facts The protect site is unusual because it is a narrow triangular shaped lot that is very narrow on the east portion of the property 3 Findin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract Facts W ithout the Variance, the protect would be deprived of privileges entoyed by other businesses within the same distract The small area and shallow depth of the site is simtlar to nearby properties on 8th Street, forwhich the Planning Commission has granted setback vanances 4 Findin That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the vicinity Facts Because this is a unique narrow lot width, the proposed protect will be in the spent of other vanances that have been approved in the general area with similar lot dimensions 5 Findin That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vanity Facts Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially incurious to properties or improvements in the viamty because the protect wdl be developed per applicable City Code criteria and will be in concert with the approved master plan Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are sufficient facts to support the findings D Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on February 17, 2004, and on July 6, 2004 recommended approval of the protect to the Planning Commission (Exhibit "F") E Technical and Grading Review Committees The Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval F Reouest for Condition Relief Staff received a letter from the property owner on August 24, 2004 (Exhibit "G") requesting relief from certain conditions related to monumentation, undergrounding of utilities along the Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street frontage, and development fees Staff has the following comments in response to the request 1 Monumentation Engineering Division Special Condition No 7 regwres the developerto construct a City Standard Entry Monument at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The monument type is "Gateway T" per Exhibit III-14 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (Exhibit "H") The monument will be located in a public easement, but the property ownerwill maintain the landscaping The developer is ~,G,I3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT . DRC2001-00154 AND DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 4 requesting City assistance with the cost of constructing the monument, but there are no City funds available for this purpose This is one of the smaller monument types, and the developer would be required to landscape this comer regardless, so staff does not believe the marginal cost of adding a monument to standard parkway improvements is unreasonable Vmevard Underoroundmg Engineering Division Specal Condition No 8 requres the developer topay an in-lieu fee for the future undergroundmg of existing overhead utilities suspended from 66 kV poles along the Vineyard Avenue frontage Since the existing utilities are on the protect side of the street, a full fee amount would be charged based on the length from the centerline of 8th Street to the center of the S C R R A /SANBAG easement (approximately 190 feet) The developer is requesting that the Planning Commission waive this regwrement since the City of Ontario is not Iikelyto underground south of 8th Street, so his funds would never be used The condition is currentlywntten consistent with paragraph 1 b of Planning Commission Resolution 87-96 (Exhibit "I") which allows a fee instead of undergroundmg that is impractical at presentforfrontage of less than 300 feet The Commission can choose to a Grant the exemption request and delete condition number 8, since the 66 kV poles will remain in any event, or b Keep the condition as written, per Planning Commission policy, or c Require the undergroundmg at this time, from a pole on the southeast comer of 8th Street and Vineyard to the first pole north of the S C R R A /SANBAG easement (280 feet) Permits would be regwred from the City of Ontario and SANBAG 3 8th Street Underproundino Engineering Division Special Condition No 9 requires the developer to underground existing overhead utilities along the 8th Street frontage Future reimbursement for half the cost of this undergroundmg is not possible from properties across the street in the City of Ontario It is not clear that requiring an in-lieu fee would be any less of a burden to the developer, but the Commission could consider reduang the length of undergroundmg by revising the first sentence of the condition to read "extending from the first pole west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel to the first pole west of Vineyard Avenue " 4 Development Fees Development fees are established by Ordinance The Planning Commission cannot reduce them Drainage and Transportation Development fees will be charged at the time of building permit issuance, based on net acreage and land use (building square footage) respectively G Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be a significant adverse environmental impact onshort-term air quality during site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant impact Also, the protect would necessitate removal of a Eucalyptus Windrow, hence, replacement planting is regwred as mitigation If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order r, ~i1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00154 AND DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daiiy Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2001-00154, and Vanance DRC2001-00155 through the adoption of the attached Draft Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Respectfully submitted, Br r City Planner BB DF\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan • Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit"D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" -Design Review Action dated July 6, 2004 Exhibit "G" - Letter from EBS Companies dated August 24, 2004 Exhibit "H" - General Plan Exhibit 111-14 and Table III-26 Exhibit "I" - Planning Commission Resolution 87-96 Exhibit "J" -Initial Study Draft Resol ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00154 Draft Resol ution of Approval for Vanance DRC2001-00155 ~J r,C~,25 r . -~~ ~ ~. 1 +- 7 OAK VALE PL ~- ~~ .:_; _ ~ r J ,: ~~,, ~ e NICI1EpNl t~ ~e~ ' c _ I - r~- a e NAPA Q = ' - -. ~ _~ _ J ~ VALLEY DR a ~cUM4 t ~ ~ T ~ $f-1,1 JA tT 0 ~ 1 SNOW flIOGE WY ( ~ T~•~ Z 6ACDY YiST DR ~ y SNOW CREEK DR ~ 81 ~ ~ ~~ 3 SI-N GOR 10 n ~ 3 SNOW VIEW PL I ~M ~ SANDSTONE PL ,C Q 4 AUTUMNHIIL DR ~ Z 6 370NESIOf 1 ~ 5 ' AI,iTUMNHILL PL ~ Q ~~: W 6 BAYBERRY flD ~'T ~ - - S LN 5 ~a~ T - SE E3 '. ~ ~ z -- t CMEN etOSSOnA ST •, '. J 7 AU7lMAN LEAf Dil •,' E ST 3 GREEl+11EAF tN - ` ~ FOREST GA 1 5 SUNNVGIE T b BLUEBERRY 7 LEMON ~ < b FERNtEAF DR ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~ _ • ~~ ~~ ` ~ J t a YM4. ST ~ ~ 1 ~ Q VE Q - ~ T a ~ a ~ "1.~P ~ • '•Z i ~ ~' 7TH z ~ CT ~ Q •~~ •: rN flcHO-1 ,, ~ ' ~ LY ~ '•. '.1 PK CIR 1 ~ ~~i of 4 .. gT ~ 4 , ~~ <~ I ~ DEODIIR ~ ~" `O CQII~T HS .... DM ~ ~~~ 11 /- ~~ 6T ST cs '~~• - ~.GT (~ !~ Qf . s'f t NEY /~C L ~~ G INa !5 °~°~ jy! _~.~. -C Ida ~w- ~~ N a M1N ~ `FYI ...« ~ 0 4 1 1 m `^ pl)\fplb`CEL 1 1°' Ln w BJILgING A z I i / Lie ~ w - I~oA~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA H LHi-H-FHFI+c~/Li__ iEF}~3~taxu~aa~,~',uuu'J.~j~E$i~l~ '„~, _+ } m -may _ ~{~i.el-~ p.~~}~ -~~ •„ F~~ K K~ PARCEL 2 i - ~ _ L0"_ I ~° ~'~ nIl1LU1NC. n ® u / ~ ~~~JJJ ~_ PARQEI. 3 ~"~ _ ~~ ~..= _ 1~15T - 37~~~ ® --- s nmIIII???lnc c ~, ~L ~ { ~' z ~ ,, ) - ° miv- ~~r-. _~w _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0th STRBEf '- 8 3 ` .e .. ~ TRACT 12218 ~ MB lfi:i/14-15 ~_~ rTr rimm~ ~ I _____ _~.°~-~--------- -- ---- --- ------- ------ VINEYARD r ~I)L~I~ ~oMpaN/E5 ~ - GATEWAY :Wnsm cwor.. rmw. ro VICINITY_' MAP as L10' "x SITE AREA - 1464 ACRES -63 772 S F u°~ _R1tLllNE Nm0's °'~ > PROPOSED BUILDINGS m a rr~Kno meroa i X IIpR MAMIFACTURIN6 °^~ t BUILDING A - 6274 5 F. u1t~°A°/°°x }~~, B'm s1R[a-! Nr5 BUILDING B-73125E me.~am ba. a, ~ I BUILDING C - 7222 5 F cL.wa m.wi m»ui. ~ 10 FREEWAY mur .ev aua I ~ I TOTAL BUILDINGS - 20,808 5 F ai avm r.T ra...nl.r COMMON AREAS - 25287 S F rwme~o e~.n ~ .va. ,wq m. sue J pARRiNG4fAR51/500° 21.0005E •LLOWEO VWtlLB ipNm LWE IH.~L 9E5LR~ILN~ i IENI (QYIER ~K sw°~ u .emwm wLarn+.+sn ~w"wm~ i ees°cxe erw+a w.`wivniFn.«m'eranro ram Iwan~ruvxnx)/ur ,waeo-° +en nLce evc BUILDING A a w,.Ww: w ~' (ta~.rrav] 8T" ST. H ~ OO REAR ELEVATION BUILDING B . ~~ ~~ ~~r ,ri,=.~~ va+zd o-w ra.a..-. ao~ irrcnu ~ ~ ~ D ~~~ REAR ELEVATION ELEVAT~VS VINEYARD ELEVATION PARKING 1 ELEVATION PARKING 2 ELEVATION PARKING 1 ELEVATION BUILDING C ~~~,..~, ~~.~o~, .~ •M 11NLi 11111` INNR4) +d+2o a.N.16.P^~~sn) -t-1 .G~ I~ 8T" ST. B -® - PARKING 3 ELEVATION VINEYARD GATEWAY SIGN ^ -0 0 REAR ELEVATION SECTION _ z.s..~,,, ~, ~ r-~ f I I I i I I n 'LJ L_J o r- ~ r ~ I -}~~-==-~j- Y 4vA _ c~ r-, I -~ L_J ,,I BUILDING A r-t I L_J ,~~.,~/ 0 -i - i ~ it ~~~ II I I I I L_J L_J I I II I LJ iii r i i i V ~ i j , I I I I x I I ~~ dmisur(t~rJ II I I I I I i I I L_J L_J I I I~ L_J BUILDING B i II ~f+n u~umo~ I ri II r-7 l I l r ~i9 r 1 ~~ i I a L_l - ' 1 LJ L_J ~ L_1 r~ I L-, _ cr.~ ~ r~ 9) I 1 r , ~~ I I , I ~~ r, I ~ I t__1 I I I I L_1 I I I ~~ L J ~-~ i ~ ~~ Y - c am r~1vrJ ~ ~ ~~ r-~ r-l i -~ II r- ~ r ,~ I I I I I I I I a ~ I 1 a L LJ L-, LJ ~~ _ r . ,.~ BUILDING C FLOOR P~NS I C +.+ru u A~~ ~ e ~. _~w.r. s~ rarmvea+-~~ s t l'~ ~1'~f ~~ ,+.~, ;~~j ~ 1+ ~ .I (!~(~ 1~~ e•~1 .yd.. I i' i. Il . Ilnd~' lt~ Idl' ~ ~1 _1 , U+ 111 1 {p ~ .il 1~ ail 1~ 1~' ~ Y a;illl j17ri ~!li~ 7~ ~Y~u 1~ lla".° i 1 ~ !nl4 ~! :1'11 ~ ,'li l 11 III i ! S iY ~ Ili 1.'•1 (t iil 111 I ~ ~ '•1 I, 1 ffi dh ,a .1 11 it 'i~l 1 llil I,/Y p 1 1 • ' ~~1111~ l~tll :1 ~Llll i !lp i111,. ° ,1 }, ~ ~ ~i ® ~u awu uu !71 (~dt i tltl •~ ''1 1~ E ~~~ !~~il~ l~f~ !a: g ` ~ a ~ i ~~ ~ ~~ ~ # 1f~'{~ ~ ~I I ~ 9 ~eie ~S7tiE s£2 €!e :37 7 1 1 a ~ 111 F!+ t '{ , 1 ~ ll~ 1' E t+, 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~'i i~ j! ~; ~ ;~~ I~ 1 ,' 9 1: s : ~i ~,II K ~~ 0 N 0 3 a w . J tv 0 m J 11 ~~ O I z O ~ a Ql Q O{~ ~ 1~ o i ~ O ~ o' a c~ F,G.zI l /I ~` ~~ -. _ - - - --~,1,,,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ -link- r -~rvrY~ vaaY• 1 nal- mY _ i -1 Inaal~~ wert^n 'x'4 e -E- ~ maTfr ~ i ~r l .u I .amp ~ 1 +.. ~ ~ ° „ „wl~ ~ "a awl ~ .a° ~~ B ILpING A AD,o / .we ® ® n L11 / F = 177260 Z BUILDING ~~at--- 'dR91~IP a / ' fnli X) $ FF=1111 BV Iwe 9 ~~ ~, K® / IN.. .~. BUI DING C 2 '111~1(/~ I)a s) FF- 1050 y'. _ _~.wJ -Ll_ - I "^, -wn=+--~ aa>9 - 's'RTde-~-elhJ STREET ^,~~../- N- / /~ c SECTIO~~r1-N BBB NOTE tlcu o[srnvnae ANV OVERHEAD UTILITIES WILL ~p,~i, ~~~+,ry,,,, ,~°^,'^' N: W DE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND V.°N°m^" vw.n<m.«N SECTIO___~~C" SECTIO__~N~~U=O °~^ ew[N N~ ~ C^xG~[MY SIAIFN[NI Ns iu[ anune uc ~Nr~~ ~ ws.v^~ow I~eI!°ewp^ RCr pM ~ r ~ ~,~' c. so^m nut lu-esae w ..nae +°" wrz 11 VP 1lAly VIIV ~v~. nin ~.ar~. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 1YMA11VC 1RAR NAP IBfBO Fe a %~t~) JNL JNL coxsuuwc cm[ v+GINnP9 JNL " "+.rr'~..'~'%.r M1 OF 1 JNL °" ^n 1 1 .ar. . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Doug Fenn July 6, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16769 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN -The proposed subdivision of 1 46 acres of land into five parcels m the General Industrial District (Subareal), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Variance DRC2001-00155 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00154 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to construct three light industrial buildings (Building "A" - 6,033 square feet, Building "B" - 7,210 square feet, and Building "C" - 7,125 square feet) on 1 46 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Variance DRC2001-00155 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi6769 VARIANCE DRC2001-00155 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to reduce the bwldmg and landscape setbacks along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue on 1 46 acres of land m the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16769 The applicant addressed issues Please see attached plans Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn Staff informed the Committee that the applicant had worked with staff and had revised the development plans that addressed the design issues identified at the February 17, 2004, Design Revew Committee meeting The Committee reviewed the revised protect and agreed with staff that the protect had addressed all their concerns The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission ~' T l3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 00 P M Doug Fenn February 17, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16769 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN -The proposed subdivision of 1 46 acres of land into five parcels in the General Industrial District (Subareas ), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN. 0209-013-15 Related Files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Variance DRC2001-00155 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00154 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to construct three light industrial bwldmgs (Budding "A" - 6,033 square feet, Building "B" - 7,210 square feet, and Building "C" - 7,125 square feet) on 1 46 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Variance DRC2001-00155 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16769 VARIANCE DRC2001-00155 -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to reduce the building and landscape setbacks along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue on 1 46 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-15 Related Files Development Review DRC2001-00154 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16769 Design Parameters The site is severely constrained by its small size and shallowness This infill site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line The site is approximately 6 feet below the adtoining Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) to the north The site slopes to the south with a fall of less than 2 percent. To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south, across 8th Street, are residential condominiums, to the west, across Vineyard Avenue, is a bar and automotive repair uses; and to the southwest is a small strip commercial center This intersection is designated by the General Plan as a gateway that should feature an Entry Monument in similar Mission Revival forms and cobblestone walls as the existing Archibald Avenue/4th Street gateway The protect contains three small sized buildings, which range in size from 6,033 square feet to 7,210 square feet, and are similar to other industrial bwldmgs along 8th Street The buildings are rectangular shaped, which is conducive for the intended use Access into the protect site is off of 8th Street Additionally, the applicant has provided an outdoors employees' area for the protect The protect also has an associated parcel map for each building and associated parking The stucco buildings include decorative details, recessed reflective glazing, metal seam roofing, fiberglass molding around windows, multi colored paint scheme, and slate file accents at the entryways Budding "A," which fronts the corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, has a tower element When you consider the existing development in the area, this protect will be a mator architectural improvement . Variance The applicant has requested flexibility from the required building and landscape setbacks along both street frontages The small area and shallow depth of the site is similar to nearby F,G,LI`f DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16769, DRC2001-00154, AND DRC2001-00155-HARMA MAGHAKIAN February 17, 2004 Page 2 properties on 8th Street for which the Planning Commission has granted setback variances Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. 1 Site Plan -The site is overdeveloped or poorly conceived as evidenced by these elements Location Site Plan Challen e Buildings A, B, C Does not comply with one tree per 30 linear feet because of the lack of lanters or lanters too narrow for the trees. Bwidmg A Trash enclosure has no landscaping to soften and creates a blinds of for drivers backin out of ad omm arkin stall. Budding B Cannot count the space m front of the loading door on the west elevation as a parking stall. Why is a 5-foot walkway shown between the outdoor plaza and the loading zone Trash enclosure has no landsca in to soften Building C Angled loading zone is impossible for trucks to maneuver in/out. Angled parking space cannot be backed out of without making a multiple-point turn No handica arkm s ace is rowded Lot A, B, C North property line does not comply with the 5-foot minimum continuous landsca a stn Lot A No stacking distance -vehicles exiting the protect will block the on-site parking stalls Outdoor plaza relegated to "left-over" space and has no shade trees or trellis Lot B Does not comply with the landscape "island" at the south end of the arkin rows Lot C No landscaping north of the parking spaces Outdoor plaza relegated to "left-over" space and has no shade trees or trellis 2 City Entry Monument -Redesign to be consistent with the General Plan regwrement to use similar Mission Revival forms and cobblestone walls as the existing Archibald Avenue/4th Street gateway (Exhibit A") Staff will make this a condition of approval 3 Architecture -Provide larger areas of the 12-inch by 12-inch slate tiles as the second two primary exterior materials This material will mostly be hidden by cars or landscaping as currently proposed along the base of the buildings Also, additional design elements are needed along the north elevations of the buildings facing the Metrolink Spandrel glass and material changes are recommended 4 Landscaping -Only one tree is proposed on-site Also, diamond-shaped tree planters must be installed in the parking lots in order to shade at least 50 percent of the pavement and to satisfy 1=,C~,Z 15 DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16769, DRC2001-00154, AND DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN . February 17, 2004 Page 3 the minimum City standard of one tree per each 3 parking stalls and one tree per 30 linear feet of bwldmg Secondary Issues Once all of the mattor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1. The block wall that is proposed along the north property line should be decorative and reflect the architecture of the bwldings 2. Parking Space #40 for Bwldmg C may conflict with the other adtacent parking spaces when a vehicle attempts to back out 3. No exterior downspouts are to be visible on any of the bwldings 4 The employee eating areas should have trellises and furniture that can withstand the Santa Ana winds 5 Landscape needs to be provided around trash enclosures 6. Parapets are to be high enough so as to screen all roof-mounted equipment 7 Shrubs should screen transformers Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be Incorporated into the protect design without discussion. 1. Paint roll-up doors and service doors to match the building elevations Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the protect be rewsed and return for further review by the Design Review Committee as a regular agenda item Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Doug Fenn At the meeting, the applicant attempted to explain how they had addressed many of the mattor issues The Committee stated that the design issues outline under the mattor and secondary issues as listed in the report have not been addressed The Committee specifically expressed that each parcel shall meet the parking requirements The Committee stated that leasing the adtacent MetroLink land for outdoor storage and yard area would not be acceptable because the yard area would not be screened from view The Committee instructed the applicant to redesign the protect and work out the many technical issues with staff before rescheduling the protect for a Design Review meeting The Committee empathized with the applicant, but informed him that he was trying to do too much on a small piece of land F,G,z i~ 00 EBS Companies, Inc. Real Estate Development -siNCe,sas 18892 Fowler Avenue, Cowan Heights, CA 92705 - 714-744-6506/fax 714-602-2180 August 24, 2004 Planning Commission Rancho Cucamonga c/o Mark Brawthen and Doug Fenn 500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Re DRC2001-00154, N E corner of 8`" & Vineyard Request for Development Assistance Dear Honorable Chairman and Planning Commissioner Thank you for the opportunity to develop this protect It has taken us three years to conform to all the required modifications requested because this is a narrow, difficult to develop and disadvantaged property . Because of the impractical arcumstances of this property, as listed below, this is my third attempt at developing this property over the last ten years One of the reasons I have been unsuccessful is because of the difficult nature of the property Further, I have had the property listed for sale over eight years but any potential developers also could not find feasibility with its impractical circumstances Subject Property Disadvantages: 1 The property is located at the Vineyard Ave Gateway entrance to the City Whereas, certain development would not be appropriate, such as a funk-recycling center (proposed but opposed by the neighborhood) Furthermore, the City regwres a monument with specific landscaping at this gateway entrance and thus wanted a more appropriate development at this location 2 The property is very narrow for a commercial development (about 95' x 570'). The property narrows down even more at the Cucamonga Creek Channel 3 It is wedged between a railroad track along the entire north side and 8`" street to the south Additional 8`" Street curb widening, right turn lane and setback will squeeze the bwld-able lot depth to the very minimum regwred to make this protect pencil out It sits 8ff + below grade from Vineyard Ave and therefore requires that a significantly gentle slope be constructed to stabilize the embankment Our bwld-able space will be setback further as a result of the revised toe of slope ~~(A F,C~, z. l ~- Honorable Chairman and Planning Commissioner August 24, 2004 Page 2 • 5 On the South side of 8"' Street is the City of Ontario, the North side is the railroad, the West is Vineyard and the East is the Cucamonga Creek Channel The south side, under normal circumstances, would share in the cost of the under-grounding The full burden of the under-grounding cost has been put solely on this development without a chance for reimbursement of one-half the cost from future redevelopment across the street Under these disadvantages and impractical feasibility in the development of this property, I am requesting help by the Planning Commission regarding the following development issues I Monument Finanaal partiapation by the City for the monument and its landscaping The disadvantage is that this is the smallest property and therefore has the greatest finanaal burden per square foot compared to any other monument sites Developer will provide all maintenance II Vineyard Under-grounding I am requesting that the existing overhead utilities remain overhead and/or no in-lieu fee to be applied because the improvement would be impractical This is because the City of Ontario is immediately to the south and adfacent to the development where the City of Ontario has no policy or indication of under-grounding in the future According to the City of Ontario, the possibility of under-grounding is zero So, even if the in-lieu fee were paid it would never be used Also, under-grounding would be impractical for the less than 95 feet on Vineyard III 8~' Street Under-grounding Please split the in-lieu fee (reduce by 50%) and give this development the option to pay reduced in-I~eu fee or contract for the under- grounding as required IV Development Fees Please reduce the development fees such as transportation fee, drainage fee, street light fee and other related fees by 50% to facilitate this development and its impractical disadvantages as stated above Thank you for your considerations Sincerel/y~~, .Q~~ ~ ~jLlt+'J~i- d"""" Frank Lane Owner ~,~,Zi~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Exhlblt III-14 Entry Monumentatlon Locations ~~~ C F c A B C D E LEGEND BIANK SYMBOLS=PROPOSED PILLEPIN SYMBOLS = E%ISTING o MID-BLOCK ENTRY MONUMENT t,~pRn.{ p STANDARD ENTRY- SINGLE CORNER Qp STANDARD ENTRY-TWO CORNERS 4 STANDARD ENTRY -THREE CORNERS MAJOR GATEWAY ENTRY MONUMENT -TWO CORNERS FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY MONUMENTATION ® SECONDARY GATE WAY ~~ ` L ~! Page III-212 D (General Plan /arpnrrtmglGP LU Master Report doc ~' ~ 1 The Planning Center October 17, 2001 ~_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN TABLE 111-26 GATEWAY DESIGN ELtmtN ~ s A This existing gateway has elements of Mission Revival fomts, with cobblestone walls Its elements may be included in future gateway locations where a more histonc or This existing gateway is constructed of cobblestone, concrete, granite tiles wn brass letters Both sides of the street are completed This gateway is completed and vnll act as an example for future smaller entry This gateway should be designed to generally follow existing gateway D above, on th north west comer of the intersection, wnh placement and landscaping to complement the adlacent design elements This gateway should be similar to existing gateway D The design should complemer the adlacent landscaping in ns placement and landscaping This gateway is located on the histonc Route 66, and should be designed to follow thi more histonc style of gateway A above The design should also incorporate text and graphics identifying histonc Route 66 This gateway should match Gateway O. This gateway should be on the north side of the street, and similar in farms and matenals to existing gateways B and C. The design should complement the adlacent landscaping in iLs placement and landscaping This gateway should be designed to generaly follow Gateway D above, on the north east comer of the intersection, vnth placement and landscaping to complement the adlacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limned, a design similar to existing gateway P should be utnrzed K,L, These gateways wall identify our Ciry from the off 2mps from the new route 21 o Ideally M,N the gateways would be at the intersection of the major street and each off ramp, as shown in the illustration below The gateways should be similar to ewsting gateway D, wrath placement and landscaping to match adlacent design elements H 11J r W -~_.~__~._I Q gtn MONUMENT P~ ZJr~ rVLn~3" iLJ' ~~1 ~~ °~. _ Q r__.~..~._.~ s. __-..~'~--1' ~ ._~ ENTRY tin MONUMENT~I lllustration showing typical freeway off ramp configuration O This gateway should be designed to generally follow Gateway D above, on the south side of the street, with placement and landscaping to complement the adlacent design elements If the area for the gateway placement is limited, a design similar to existing natewav P should be utdrzed is a small existing cobblestone and ~_ ~. Page III-216 77te Planning Center D 1C3enera/ Plan IarpnnanglGP L(/ Master Report tloc ~ (~ T ~Q October 17, l~~l III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY TABLE 111-26 GATEWAY DESIGN ELEMENTS' p This gateway is located on the histonc Route 66, and should be designed to follow the more histonc style of gateway A above The design should also Incorporate teM and ra hits Ident in histonc Route 66 This atewa should match Gatewa G R This gateway should be on the south side of the Artow Highway, and similar In forms and matenals to existing Gateway D. The design should complement the adlacent landsca in In its lacement and lantin S This gateway should be designed to generally follow Gateway D, on the north east comer of the Intersection, oath placement and landscaping to complement the adlacent design elements If the area for the gateway placement Is Ilmrted, a design similar to ov,et,nn natewav P should be utilized T This gateway should be on both sides of Vineyard Avenue, and similar In ronns ana matenals to existing gateway A The design should complement the adlacent landscaping In its placement and planting Note 1 Descnpnons are keyed to location shown on Exhibit III-14, Entry Movement LocaLOns 6.3.5 Accessibility Accessibility for all people, Including those wrfh special needs, has always been an important commrfment for our City. Early visions of accessibility were guided by the community and evolving State laws While the State was a leader in establishing accessiblliry provisions, the Americans wrfh Disability Act of 1990 (ADA) provided addrfional regulations. The current State provisions are provided under Chapter 11 of the Calrfornia Building Code The regulations address new construction, remodeling and historic preservation projects. These guidelines are applied to each protect that passes through our City's building and planning process The provisions of the Amencans with Disabilities Act take a very proactive position in addressing accessibility, setting time limits for compliance for both the pnvate and public sector. Our City has completed two Transition Plans to address accessibility 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Amencans with Disabilities Act Phase I Transition Plan was completed in October 1997. This plan addressed City parks and recreation facilrfies, curb ramps, and driveways along our mator arterials. The plan provides for communication services, document transcription, equipment, and review processes as well as recommended changes to the physical environment Each item is identrfied, a description of its barrier definition is provided, and a suggested action is given, with cost, schedule and funding sources identified The schedule for implementation is through 2006 City oJRancho Cucamonga General Plan Page III-217 Oewberl7, 2001 ~' ~ I ~~ ` D~GsntmlP/anlorpsWU,B~+PLUMmISrRepnrLdoe RESOLUTION N0. 8796 A RESOLUTION OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION N0. 86-77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 1 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*:_ a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the project: The Developer s all pay a fee to the City for one-half the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section 1 above an be eligible for reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containen 66KV or lar er electrical lines: All lines shall be undergrounded or in-lieu fees pay in accordance with section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines F,~,I as t 5. Limits of Responsibilities: a developed fromsprope ty lane toppropertyll~neh(the tcenteroof adjacent streets for corner properties). b. Under grounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per Section .a times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 7. Exem ti~ons_ The following types of projects shall be exempt from this po icy: a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment scree m ng, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d, interior tennant improvements and non-construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to contribute to future undergrounding. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel . rights-of-way, etc. F,G,T~3 t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JUNE 1987. PLANNING COMh}ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r ~ n 1 \ /' BY: ATTEST: McNi,~l, Chairman ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY CJ l 11 Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Orvisron (9U9)477-2750 uoisiniQ 6umue~, a6uoweon~ o4ousy ~^ r ,~ IOOZ 9 Z 0,; ~~.. paniaaa~ n ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed,{~, project so that the City may review,tFie project pursuant to°City policies, ordinances, arid` a~~~.. guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City Rulesyand~'Procedures to Implement CEC~A. It is important that the information requested in this application be ,, provided in full. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r" ~ - -~ ~ ' r ,. -, , _ ~ n t >• .' I °i 0. ~, Orr' ' INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbrllty of the applicant to ensure that he app6cahon rs complete at the bme of submittal, Crty stall wdl not be available to perform work regmred to prowde missmg information Application Number for the protect to which this fomY pertains T-.--.-~- - - - ~- = %r` Pro/ect Title Name & Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor ~~G ~/~O-0/.S4 }-,C7i2 as iING' =1NAL\FORMSr~OUNTER\INffSTD1 WPD 3/00 Page 1 Name & Address of pro/ect ~~ K. `"~''"~ Contact Person & "~h!~ ~~ ~ u-'i" (u^` ~ ~' ~" " Name & Address of person preparing this (orm (~f different lrom above) Number •1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ect site, and rnd~cate the site boundaries 2) Provide asst o/color photographs which show representative wews into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing locahon o/each photograph s 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) l_.J 4) Assessor=s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet r/ ~ ~ r ©/,~ - /~~ ~•_., , _ ,.._. necessary) 6 ~y U/- •5) Gross Srte Area (ac/sq ff) ~ 3~7/ • f34 ~{~ ~ - ~5) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cat~ons) 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach add~honal sheet rf necessary u~~~ ~,C,zac~ Informahon md~cated by asterisk (') ~s not regwred of nonconstmchon CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff . 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies m order to /ully implement the pro/ect 9)Descnbe the physcal sethng of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stabddy, plants and animals, matu2 tn;es, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any ewsting structures on srte (including age and condd~on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant /eatums descnbed In addition, site all sources of mformahon (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, b~ot~c and archeological surveys, traffic studies) 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/or h~stoncal aspects of the ste Srte all sources o(mformat~on (books, published reports and oral history) w I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 3 11)Descnbe any nose sources and their levels that now affect the site (a~roraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl affect proposed uses 12)Descnbe the proposed pro/ecf ~n detail l is should provide an adequate descnpbon of the site m terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed protect Indicate if the2 a2 proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anhapated completion o/each increment Attach addrt~onal sheet(s) r/necessary T~~ 5~~ w~~~ --4QVF 3 8v1cD1-.Y' u~~ „~.. -~°T°~ ~,, ,n n~ ~,,,-rnr~ nt I7, 3 7r~ ~~ ~H1l.~iiVG' ~l~o~!e s 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including mformat~on on plants and animals and any cultural, h~stoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (resrdenbal, commeroral, etc ), mtensrty of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, (rootage, setback, rear yard, etc ) 14) ill the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the profect~ ~v ~', G, Tab 15JInd~cate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, rncludrng source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-srte uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed ~~ L~ ~~/I.,E' ~riLlJ f E Llb/F /yi~C~i'JE GUO/7/~ ~- ~lJ.r~ '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/matun: or scenic trees 17) Indicate any bodies of water (~ncludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams ®l~2 ~ / 7" 18Jlndicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUdayJ b Commercral/Ind (gal/day/acJ Peak use (gaVmrn/ac/ _ 19)Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal ~~Septic Tank ewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewagd system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage est~matesJ For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987- 2591 a Resrdenhal(gaVdayJ b CommeroraUlnd (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of resrdent~al units Peak use (gaUDay) Detached (md~cate range of paroel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze 11PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 5 Attached (md~cate whether unds are rental or for sale units) 21)Anhcipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (per month) $ to 22) Speafy number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate antiapated household srze by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wtll be res~dmg w~fhm [he protect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary b Jurnor High c SemorH~gh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type oI use(s) and mayor function(s) o/ commen:~al, mdustnal or msbtubonal uses 26) Total /loor area of commercial, mdustnal, or msbtubonal uses by type ~ G, L 30 27) Indicate hours of opembon 28) Numberof Total employees Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift 29) Provide breakdown of ant~c~pated/o6 classifications, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdicabon of the rate o(h~re for each classification (attach add~t~onal sheet rf necessary) 30) Est~mat~on o/the number of workers to be hired that currently resde m the Cdy • •31)For commercial and mdustnal uses only, md~cate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South CoastA~rQualrty Management Distract, at (818J 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their abtlrty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ It so, please indicate their response F,C~,T31 i \PI ANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 7 • ! In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals 33)Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not I~mited to PCB=s, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable l~gwds and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe then use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known ~~ O 34) X11 the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not l~mrted to [hose examples listed abovev 11 yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans I hereby cerfrty that the statements /um~shed above and m the attached exhibits present the data and mformat~on requned for adequ evaluahon of this pro/ect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and in/ormat~on presented ara tine and correct tot he b of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional in/ormation may be requned to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~/Signature Tale +=,~tz ~a _. .___......,,.. ~.._~~„~.,.T..r... ,.,.,.. ~,.... Paae 8 ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day ApUCondo 400 gaVday Commereral/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3000 gallday/ac Neighborhood Commercal 1500 gallday/ac General Industrial 1500 gallday/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Famlly 270 gal/day ApUCondos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General Commercal 2000 gallday/ac Neighborhood Commercial 100-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9/86 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 9 • ATTACHMENT B ~J Contact the school distract for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Distracts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Ehwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 ~~ +' ~~~T~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 10 ~ ~ 710000 ~ ~ r z. ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ •y~ ~. . _ ' __ ~ _.~ . FEET 16) ' ~ ~ ~l ~. _ ~° ~ f ~, ~ , ., i~S. . ~ _" - f ~Fi - ~ , C I~ ~~. >, • ~ rA, f' o ~ ;~ . _ ` filer .. \ ~ l ~ ~ ng a '(H st mal n mark) r fib _ _ / I PI P~ =~P %• ~ _ 'OOJ llc ~ ~' lx r ~ ? 'n 2 0 ~ -iir. .. I A o iz~ p I _ is ~ ~.. wQ Tr ~ -~-` W ~~ Qa r f ~~ Q~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ a _ / ~,~ n r` J ~1 4 ' ~ ^ A I^ 0 Well _ Ilq 14 i ' •III-- ~l H w S 13 •,~. R MAR 2 6 ?_001 ~,' ~' i~.J;~ . ;, R; 3 ~ I~' ~ ~~ '',~ . t 'U ..!~ ~~ i C~ y~, ;ice- - ~,; ~, / ,c ~ ' ~~ _ ~ ; ~ ..~ 7 __ 'rte _ ~" - -_ + r ~ .. "~ . _ :- .~ ? _ _ ~_ g te -:; s s s ~'~i'~: '"~' ~.~ ~i~~{~ ~ j~ ~ ~; ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~Y~" 1~ ' ~ ~ ~ `4~` `t til , IV r ~ r f i r i • ~ ~ ~ n ' ~ ~ ~ ~ !''~ ~, ! rl „. ~ ~~~ n ~ f ~~~, QT ~r e~ :' pp ` .t ,i4 4 . . ~ J~~ ~~~ { .~ t.. „ ~ ' O V ~.1- L.J r1 F,C~,T 39 L.J -\ X71 F.c~,z~+o • • ~9; ~_~ ~,G,~yl ro) CJ 1 1 f 1 i=,C~~T4a H c~ O • 14; • 4 i ~J' F, ~,r ~~ r ~ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Fde• Development Review DRC2001-00154 Related Files: Variance DRC2001-00155 Description of Project• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (DRC2001-00154) -HARMA MAGHAKIAN - A request to construct three light industrial bwldings (Bwlding "A" 6,003 square feet, Buldng "B" - 7,210 square feet and Building "C" - 7,125 square feet) on 1 46 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street- APN 0209-013-13 and 15 Rela ted File Variance DRC2001-00155 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Frank Lane 6505 Esplande Suite #3 Playa Del Rey 90293 5 General Plan Designation: Industrial 6 Zoning Generallndustrial 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line The site slopes to the south with a fall of less than 2 percent To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commeraal center Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number Douglas Fenn, Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) None ~ ~ ~, T ~{S Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00 1 54 Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR-Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model F, Gi, Z ~co Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) HydrologyNVater Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation r/~ nnanriatnrv Findings of Swnfic (/) Air Quality (/) GeologylSods ()Land UselPlanning () PopulationlHousing () TransportationlTraffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a sigmficant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigmficant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date Initial Study for nar7nnl-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Tian Signifimnl Less Polenbally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signifiwnl MiOphon Sign,ficanl No Impact Into oratetl 1 d I ct EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O O (/) b) Substantially damage scenlc resources, Including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property Ilne To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrofink) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center The proposed prolect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines less than 66Kv and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The Impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract F,y,r 48 Initial Study for nRC:2oo1-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signifiwnl Mibgaaon Significant No I atl Inm tea I d 1 d c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, 2/3 of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center This site has not been used for agricultural use for over ten years and there are no nearby sensitive uses No adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () ('~) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people F,G~ ~ 49 Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 less Than Signifimnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenUally Signifipnl Wlh Mingafion Than Significant Nc I ct Inco letl I d 1 ad Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development well contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • F,C~, T Sc~ • Initial Study for DRC2001-00 1 54 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Sigmfrant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With MNgahon Than Sigmfinnl No I act Inc tetl I d I d • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the city if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result o} hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) • 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas ~F, G, T 5 ~ Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenfially Sigrvfinnl wu~ Miagafion roan Signficant No I tl In led I cl I C 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within '/.-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located less than Y.-mile from the nearest sensitive receptor there are existing residential condominiums across 8`" Street and single-family residential homes to the west/southwest Industnal use is not expected to generate toxic air contaminants The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for toxic air contaminants will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated e) Typically, the industrial uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or U O O (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wddhfe Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on npanan habitat or O O O (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means • • ~,C-y.,TS~t • C J Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than S,gnifiranl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenOally Sigmfinnt With Minga4on Than Significant No I act Inco led I act Im C d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () (/) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habdat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial related uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement b) This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property Ilne To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect Implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed Also see comments noted under a) above for additional documentation No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are heritage trees on the protect site The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a tree ordinance which states, 'The eucalyptus, palm, oak, sycamore, pine, and other trees growing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a natural aesthetic resource which help define the character of the city Such trees are worthy of protection in order to preserve the scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution " There is a stand old eucalyptus trees along the north property line, and they are not in good shape The applicant must obtain a tree removal permit before construction and grading for proposed buildings six and seven The following mitigation measure shall be implemented F, ~, , T 53 initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Slgnifipnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Scurces Polenhally Slgnifipnl With Mlagallon Than Signifiont No I ct Inco IeE I q I C 1) Tree removal shall require replacement planting on aone-for-one basis with the largest nursery grown specimens available as determined by the City Planner. f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (`~) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () Q of an archeological resource pursuant tc § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The prolect site has not been Identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider estabhshmg provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original i F, C•y. ~ T CJ I • Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than S,gnifitant Less Polenfially Wtlh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~gryfimnl n~,ogafio~ SiBnlfimn~ I Nan illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation momtonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of street improvements, a flood control channel and railroad, surrounding developments and annual disang for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated • 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on () () () (`~) the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ O O O (~) F,g,z s5 Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sigmfinnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigmficanl With Mmgaaan Than Sigmfinnt No Im act Inco a21ea I C I ct III) Seismic-related ground failure, including hquefaction~ O O O (/) iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result In substantial Boll erosion or the loss of topsoll~ () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soli that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to Ilfe or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and It Is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red HIII Fault, passes approximately 2 miles north of the of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 00 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Aiso, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 9 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 14 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-th an-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the Impacts of windblown sand, resulting In temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Soil types onsite consist of Tulunga Gravelly LOAMY SAND (TvB), according to General Plan Exhibit V-3, with the moderate to high potential for bare soil blowing if left unprotected Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be Implemented to reduce Impacts to less-than-sigmficant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. ~J • ~', G,r SCE Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Signifiwm less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Wifi MM1igafion Than Stgmficant No Im act Inco ted I d I ct 4) Chemical soli-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) Indicates that subsidence Is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of Tutunga Gravelly LOAMY SAND, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 No adverse Impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial Boll deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly LOAMY SAND soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils typically have high permeability and runoff is slow to very slow Tutunga Gravelly LOAMY SAND can be nearly level to strongly sloping The protect site has very gentle grades In southerly direction No adverse impacts are anhapated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would fhe pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials Into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working In the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan F, G, r5~ Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenfially Sigmfcanl win MNgahon Than Sigmfipnt No I d Inc tea I n 1 d h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for hazardous materials will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for hazardous materials will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level-less-than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are a couple of schools in the City of Ontario to the south of the project that are within '/, mile of the protect site The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code requires that all uses within this Subarea "to be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors, which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed industrial building protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Project site is located approximately 1 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 1 5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project Includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated ~J F.G. Z58 Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially WN Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgm aranl I MeingaYOnea Significant I NpaCl h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-7 ~_~ HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project 8 . a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (/) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there uld be a net defeat in aquifer volume or a lowering of wo the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support exlsting land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the exlsting drainage pattern of the site () (/) () ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site O O O (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) a3paaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing wthin a 100-year flood hazard area as O O O (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seethe, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) thec Cucamonga aDnd4Ch no Bas nshe CCWD hasi adopted) apmasterd plan ghat estimates F,C ,rsq Indial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00154 Page 16 Less Tian Signifipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenfially Sigmfiwnl wth MM1iga4on Tian Signifinnt No I act Inco oralee 1 d I d demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because It is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer poor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No Impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution ~, C~, T (co Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than SlgnNwnl Less Polenhally WIN Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant MNgahon SlBnlficant No I act Inm te0 1 n I 3) Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. q) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse Impacts are expected h/i) The protect site is located within the 100-year flood hazard area of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, aconcrete-lined flood control faculty that borders the eastern edge of the protect site The Cucamonga Creek Channel protects the site from major storm runoff A Hydrology Study was prepared by Environmental HlghTech Engineering (October 17, 1986) The study determined that the proposed structures would be protected from possible overflow of the Channel because the building pads are elevated above adtacent land The study also concluded that there is a localized sump condition In 8th Street in front of the site which drains into a catch basin that outlets into the existing 42" diameter storm drain system In 8th Street The runoff from the site In its existing undeveloped condition is 2 cubic feet per second ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, Impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sets a[ the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the level of non-significance within the Clty This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict wuh any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O O (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or O O O (/) natural community conservation plan Fi~itT(~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00154 Page 18 Less Than SiBryficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Petenfially Sigmficanl WiN Mifigaaon Tian Sign,finnt No I n Inw teE I d I ct Comments a) This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrollnk) To the east is the Cucamonga Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center The proposed prolect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan for the site The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The land use designation of the prolect site is Industrial The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The prolect site is located in an area developed with industrial uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Result m the loss of avadabddy of a known mineral O O O (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use piano Comments. a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenciesv b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect C~ F, ~, T coo • Inltlal Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Tl,an Sign,fipnt less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgnifrant Wilh Mdiga4on Than Sgnificanl No I ct Incor oratetl I d I n d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the protect vianity above levels existing without the prolect~ () (/) () ( ) e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people restding or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the wcmdy of a private airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive Horse levels Comments• a) The City's Development Code requres that all uses in Subarea 1 be operated in a manner so as to not generate noise level exceeding 75Ldn as measured at the lot Ime of the source The City's standard is 65Ldn and 75Ldn for interior and exterior nose levels m the general industrial area According to General Plan Exhibit V-11, conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will suffice without any speaal noise insulation requirements The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of S•00 p m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17.02 120•D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly nose level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted i b) The industrial uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticpated to increase the ambient noise levels wdhm the vicmdy of the protect d) See a)response above F,~tZ'~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00154 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Poten4aily Significant wnn MNpa4on Than Sigmficanl No i a inm yea i a i a e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticpated The nearest prwate airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 '/s miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction, actwdies at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area If commeraal or industrial include this sentence Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matonty of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result m substantial adverse physical impacts assoaated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental (acd~hes, need for new or physically altered governmental faal~ties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, m order to mamtam acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other performance ob/echoes for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O ('~) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? O O O (/) Comments a) This infill site is located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street The site is vacant with a stand of Eucalyptus trees along the north property line To the north is the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (used by Metrolink) To the east is the Cucamonga C~ n LJ • Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Signifi~nt Less Potentially Wlh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant MNgaLOn Significant No I an Inm waled 1 C I tl Creek concrete flood control channel To the south across 8th Street are residential condominiums, to the west across Vineyard Avenue is a bar and automotive repair uses, to the southwest is a small strip commercial center The site would be served by a Fire Station 172 located approximately 1 5 miles northeast, and Fire Station 174 located approximately 2 25 miles east, from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated r1 LJ b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anhapated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City LJ 14 RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment ~; ~ , T (~ S Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . DRC2001-00154 Page 22 Less Than Sign,fican~ Less Issues and Su ortin information Sources PP g Fo~enUally 9gnifirdnl Wih Mdigahon Tnan Signifiranl No I ad Inco reteE I d Im d Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park, is located approximately 5 miles from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will regwre the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above 15 TRANSPORTATIONffRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial Increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either mdroidually or cumulatroely, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either O O O (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capaaty~ () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in prolect design The prolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect consists of three light Industrial buildings totaling 20,368 square feet The prolect will generate 20 two-way peak hour vehicle trips which is less than the 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land use, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements • F,c~,rc~~ • Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenaally significant Wih Mnlgawn Than Significant No I tl Inco lee I C I h existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated • C_J g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signifcant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the O O O (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity O O O (/) to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply wdh Federal, State, and local statutes and O O O (/) regulations related to solid waste Fr~tTc~~- Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Sign~ficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenfially Sigrufinnt Wih M,4gafion Than Sigrufinnt No I C Inc tetl I d I h Comments. a) The proposed prolect Is served by the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No Impacts are anticipated b) The proposed prolect is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the aties of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CCWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) Is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent The proposed protect would include the construction/operation of 3 industrial buildings totaling 20,368 square feet Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221, and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CCWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CCWD Is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilities Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be in accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and is not considered significant The protect is served by the Cucamonga County Water Dlstrlct water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect Is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs • • g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid • waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to Implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no Impacts are anticipated ~'ryi~ X08 Irntial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g ?olenbally SlgnlfiWnl With Mingafian Tnan Sgmficant No I ad Inmrpatated I act Im ct 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () (/) ( ) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are indmduaily () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial and office/professional uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balanang the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study Identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels t=- , ~,, r coq Initial Study for DRC2001-00154 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Sigmfipnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sigmfinnl With M,hgahon Than 9gnificant No I act Inco orated I C 1 n EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) (/) Hyrdology Study (Environmental Hightech Engineering, October 17, 1986) ri~7~ TAD Inttial Study for DRC2001-00154 Issues and Supporting Information Sources APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than $igtYfiont Less With Than A4bgahan S~grvfiranl No I certrfy that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Imtlal Study and the proposed mitlgation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~~~;~ ~\~ Date ~' 1~~0 Print Name and Title _~ra,~r=,,, 1 At" ~ "~" ~~~~ F , ~ , ?' 'til City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Prolect File No Development Review DRC2001-00154 Public Review Period Closes• September 8, 2004 Project Name. Prolect Applicant Harma Maghakian Project Location (also see attached map)• Located at the northeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street - APN 0209-013-13 and 15 Project Description. The development of 3 light industrial buildings totaling 20,808 square feet on 1 46 acre in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding• ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negatwe Declaration during the review period. September 8 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO 04-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00154, TO CONSTRUCT THREE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ON 1 46 ACRE OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1), LOCATED ON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET -AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0209-013-15 A Recitals 1 Harma Maghakian filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001- 00154, for the development of 3 mdustnal buildings (Budding "A" - 6,274 Square feet, Building "B" 7,312 Square feet, and Budding "C" - 7,222) on 1 46 acres of land within the General Industnal Distnct Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to infill properties located at the northeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, adtacent to other similar uses, and b The application contemplates the construction of three light mdustnal buildings (Budding A - 6,274 Square feet, Budding B 7,312 Square feet, and Bwidmg C - 7,222), and c The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally mtunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity d The General Plan Transit Concept Plan designates Vineyard Avenue as an existing fixed route transit service (i a ,bus) corridor, however, there is insufficient linear frontage distance between 8th Street and the existing railroad comdor along the north boundary of the proposed protect to accommodate a bus bay F,~,T ~3 PIANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, and b The design or improvements of the proposed project is consistent wrath the Development Code, and the purposes of the distract m which the site is located, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and vhldlife or their habitat, and The proposed project is not likely to cause senous public health problems 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that well result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below • and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference F, G , r ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN • September 8, 2004 Page 3 Planrnna Division 1) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as viewed from adjacent properties and street 2) No chain link fencing is permitted 3) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for outdoor employee eating areas 4) Bwldings shall be maintained free of graffiti Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 5) The applicant shall obtain a Tree Removal Permit pnor to the issuance of any budding or grading permit En aineenna Diwsion 1) Widen 8th Street to 22 feet north of the existing street centerline (centerline to curb face) along the entire protect frontage, extending east to /oin with existing drainage faalities east of the site In addition, provide a westbound nght tum lane on 8th Street approaching the Vineyard Avenue intersection, per Standard Drawing No 119 2) Frontage improvements on Sth Street shall include curb & gutter, 6foot wide curb ad/scent sidewalk west of the westem most dnve approach, and 4-foot wide property line ad/scent sidewalk east of the westem most dnve approach Provide new catch basin with storm drainpipe lateral and related drainage facilities to convey and outlet flows to existing storm drain south and/or east of the site Prowde three 9500 lumen HPSV street lights, street trees as outlined in the standard conditions section S 9, street pavement to centerline of street, street stnping, and traffic signing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and additional items as follows a) Lane configuration at 8th & Vineyard intersection - 14-foot westbound nght tum, 12-foot westbound through, 12-foot through west left tum, and 16-foot eastbound through b) Transition to meet existing stnping west of the Vineyard Avenue intersection and include on the stnping plan the proposed transition to existing stnping to the east of the pro/ect c) Protect existing budge, channel, and other Flood Control Distnct facddies 3) Vineyard Avenue frontage improvements will include a) Provide City Monument on the northeast comer of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue t',G,T~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 Page 4 b) Build up a slope (2 1 maximum) adtacent to the existing sidewalk Top of 2 1 slope shall be 1 foot from edge of sidewalk c) Protect existing public improvements including, but not limited to, sidewalk, curb and gutter, streetlights, traffic signal, pavement, traffic striping, and signage, or replace d) Protect existing railroad faalities 4) In compliance with Engineering Condition No 2, the street design for the north side of 8th Street shall include the whole distance between Vineyard Avenue and the Flood Control District Bridge Channel east of the site (some off-site work) 5) Additional street dedications, measured from centerline of street, shall be as follows 33 feet on 8th Street, widening to 40 feet along the right tum lane, and 44 feet on Vineyard Avenue 6) Comer property line cut-offs shall be dedicated per City Standards 7) Provide sidewalk easements as needed for transitions from curb • adtacent to property Ime adtacent sidewalk at the west dnve approach on 8th Street In addition, provide sidewalk easement(s) as needed around other 8th Street dnve approaches 8) A City entry monument is regwred at the northeast comer of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue Sufficient additional dedication shall be provided to accommodate said monument (no public funds are available forthis, developer must bwid and maintain) The entry monument wall and landscaping are subtect to City Engineer's approval Related plans for the wall, including structural engineering, shall be submitted to the Engineering Drvision month the street improvement plans In addition to the street trees along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue, the City will be requinng multi-trunk Crape Myrtles at the monument, to be installed and maintained by the developer g) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of Vineyard Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits The fee shall be the full Gty adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the S C R R A /SANBAG Railway right-of-way to the centerline of 8th Street 10) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of 8th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending from the first pole east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel to the end of line pole east of Vineyard Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first Reimbursement oradditional in-lieu PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8, 2004 . Page 5 fee payments do not apply because future re-development across the street is within the City of Ontano and Ontano will determine undergrounding regwrements on that side of the street 11) The pro/ect is located within Flood Zone "A,"therefore, the probed must comply Huth Ordinance No 669, as amended, providing for fioodplain management regulations per Chapter 19 12, Section 19 12 051 under C2 12) A previous drainage report for this site will need to be revised to reflect the current San Bemardmo County Hydrology Manual (see Drainage Report Requirements -provided earlier) 13) The atywide Transportation Development Fee, covenng the City-adopted estimated costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development, shall be paid upon issuance of building permits 14) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan 15) Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect CC&Rs 16) A permit from the railroad company shall be required for any grading upon, access through, or other development work within their nght-of- way 17) A permit from the City of Ontano is required pnor to any work within their nght-of-way, including storm drain connections that may be made to storm drams within or conveyed through their nght-of-way Environmental Mitigation .4v Qualrty 1) All construction equpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for • the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAOMD), as well as City Planning Staff ~', ~, S ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN . September 8, 2004 Page 6 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares, or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible g) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans . include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use F,G,r~g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN • September 8, 2004 Page 7 10) All mdustnal and commeraal faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All mdustnal and commeraal faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All mdustnal and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resoun;es 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, • the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the archaeological hentage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follov~nng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudion field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation • measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures ~F, G, r ~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN • September 8, 2004 Page 8 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated v~nth • vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and WaterQual~ty 1) Pnor to the issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect descnption and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 2) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State • Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Consiruction Permit F, c~ , Z' go PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-107 DRC2001-00154 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN • September 8, 2004 Page 9 Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Bwlding Official The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Maaas, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • F,~,=8t City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2001-00154 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom • and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering alf costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency • Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F, ~, r sa Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2001-00154 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • F,~,.Z83 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2001-00154 Applicant: Frank Lane Initial Study Prepared by: Douulas Fenn. Assciate Planner Date: September 2. 2004 . ~ -~~, ,.,~,,...n~,~ Air Quality ,-t~, ~~ ,g„,, , _ n ~ • . . ~ . ~ x ,>, ~~_.~••~,",~. , ~ , ,_~` , ~~.~„ ,~ ~~., ; 3, ~ w~ a : i ~`'' ~ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C . operating condition so as to reduce operational Review of Plans AIC 2/4 emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the (]proposed schedule and protected equipment use ~ Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emissron mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site g0 C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 throw h seedin and waterin • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads g0 C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 1 of , , ~ i i Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large g0 C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of g0 C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work enods Dispose of surplus excavated material in g0 C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineerin ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established g0 C Review of Plans A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to ad/scent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , g0 C Review of Plans A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) ~n accordance with Rule 403 re uvements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils g0 C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO C Review of Plans AIC 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equpment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial faalities shall designate CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools 1~ f 2of6 . - •. .. , All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas i All industrial and commercial site tenants wdh 50 or CP C Revew of Plans D 2/3 more employees shall be requred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Review of Report AID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPIBO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a i theme or focal oint Pursue educating the public about the CP/BO C Review of Report A1D 3/4 archaeolo ical herita a of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of Report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of Report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the pro/ect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin 3 of • -. .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of Report AID 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate , the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B RewewofReport A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbin actiwties Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of Report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geologic Problems The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) Construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes h 4of6 .- -. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE BIC/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall CE B/CID Review of Pians A/C 2/4 prepare a SW PPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall BO BICID Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (W QMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/CID Review of Pians A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to complywith obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 5 of s ~ .. . .. Noise a~,r~~_ .... ... ., ,,~~.~ti ~ ... .. ~t.~. 4u,..ti- .. . ~w a ~.~~f? ;~ ... . ~ ~„~ .. .: ~~~. . . :. . Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards speafied in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Dvision The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ~ H T ~O Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permd CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bulding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports (Studies / Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdatwn 6 of 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00154 SUBJECT: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: HARMA MAGHAKIAN LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Development Review DRC2001-00154 is granted subject to the approval of _/_/_ Variance DRC2001-00155 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-107 Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed SC-1-04 ~, C~,T ~fo Protect No DRC2001-00154 Comolehon Date C. D. ent l D • opm eve Stte 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Condittons ~_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Dtvtston to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, urigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, ali ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~_/ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits ~ Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are requued and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ._/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Alt bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/~_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Ctty Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bulding permits 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter Bud ding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or -/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and SC-1-04 F, ~,T 9i Protect Na DRC2001-00154 Completion Date streets as required by the Planning Diwsion Such screening shall be architecturally integrated . with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a budding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the requred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercal, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development 4 For industrial protects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and egwpment shall be suffiaent G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 O8 110, and so noted on the grading plans The SC-1-04 / / _/~_ -~-~- -~-~- ~~- -/~- _/-J- -/-J- / / / / -~-~- ~, ~,I9a Project No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be • shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial prolects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/~- tree per 30 linear feet of bulding 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting requued bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften then appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shalt be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas ~ within the public right-of-way Ail landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Division 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~- perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 12 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval _//_ prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Sig ns 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs SC-1-04 ~' ~ T-9~ Project No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner revew and -/_/- approval prior to issuance of building permits I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of -/-/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used bythe Crtyto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mtigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The appltcant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location -/_/- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE. ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-J- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Cetirng and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and au condmonmg, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , DRC2001-00154) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~/_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls -//- SC-1-04 f=, ~,.z- 9y Project No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/~ Building and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Diwsion for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~_/_ recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public ~_/_ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for regwred occupancy separations ~_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~- 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/~ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits SC-1-04 6 Protect No DRC2001-00154 Comolehon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 33 total feet on 8th Street 44 total feet on Vineyard Avenue 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 7 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other 8th Street X X X X X X 3 Improvement Plans and t;onstruction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be SC-1-04 / / / / _/_/_ I / / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / f,Gi,z'9~ Prgect No DRC2001-00154 posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans Completion Date • / / I / / / / / / / / / / I / / r~ LJ sc-~-oa ~; ~, r 9~ Protect No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date The City Engineer reserves the right to ad)ust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Pro)ect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze Qty Vineyard Avenue Rhus lances African Sumac 5' 27' 15 Fill In Vineyard Avenue Platanus acerifolia London Plane 8' 35' 15 Fill (Background) In 8th SVeet Brachychiron acerifolia Flame Tree 5' 30' 15 Fill In 8th SVeet Lagerstrcemia White Crape Myrtle 3' 20' 15 Fill W/OH UGIiGes indica X faunei Hypbnd In ivatachez Construction Notes for Street I rees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are sub)ect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all pro)ect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required i Q. R. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to )pin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Crty Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from ad)acent areas S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro)ects SC-1-04 9 F, ~,rg8 / / / / ,/ / / / / / / / / / / Project No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the butldings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures V. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices W. Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 X. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibddy Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stenals for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Y. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives SC-1-04 10 _/_/~ / / / I / I / I ~-~ / / / / -/-~ Protect No DRC2001-00154 Completion Date . APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED r~ LJ r 1 U SC-1.04 ~, ~,T 100 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION RCFPD STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01 PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME: DATE: PLAN TYPE: APPLICANT NAME: OCCUPANCY CLASS: FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED• LOCATION: )1-00154 Industrial Park n U October 30,03 for Hioh Plle Fire FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazl, Sr Plans Examiner PLANNER: Doug Fenn ,~.,a~ ..,.~.~,.,~,~..,.,..aa,..-~.....,.,.,.._,.,,., ,.,rte,., ~,,.,~„~~, .,,,,d~„Af~,.~>,,,..,a~~...a,,.,...,....,.~,.,,.,,,.~,..,,.;..,,.~,~,..F,~,.. ,,,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Regwrements for Public and Private Water Supply 1 General Guidance for Fire Hydrants. The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fve hydrants The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial pro)ects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 100-feet 2 Minimum Fve Flow: The regwred fire flow for this pro)ect is 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended Please see "Water Availability' attachment for required verification of fire flow availability for the proposed pro)ect 3 Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow• Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed pro)ect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow sub)ect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on ad)acent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow =,C~,T101 Varies < 7500 The fire flow available at the site requues a minimum Type III-N building n LJ r~ FSC-S Fire Alarm System 1 Required Installation: An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard Refer to Ordinance 15 and/or the California Fire Code for specific requirements 2 Remodel and Changes• Prior to any remodel, modrfication, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are required Plans and specifications shall be subm~ted to Fire Constructon Services FSC-10 Hazard Control Permits- Technical Comments The below indicated permit requirements are based on those permits commonly associated with the protects operations or building construction As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) Note: Carefully review the items below. There may be significant impact on the proposed project. Itallazed text indicates a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District amendment. 1 General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 2 Operate a repair garage (Motor Vehicle H-4) 3 High piled combustible storage FSC-t2 Plan Submittal Required Notice Requred plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our authority The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents Contact the Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for assistance PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1 Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect Contact the Fire Safety Droision (909) 477-2770 2 Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division Contact Water District to schedule testing F,G,sloa 3 Building Use Letter- Required Letter Prior to the issuance of any bulding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fue District comments Provide a separate letter for each building or structure with storage use areas Contact the PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Fire Alarm System. Plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fue District permit 2 Knox Rapid Entry System. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specilic details and ordering information Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection 3 Address- Other Than Single-family New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an adddional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 4 Fire Alarm System- Final Inspection and Testing. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services 5 High-pile Combustible Storage-Permit: The applicant is required to obtain a Fue District Permd for Storage of High-pile Combustible material 6 High-pile Combustible Storage- Plans• The applicant shall submit plans for the storage arrangement to Fue Construction Services The applicant shall submit detailed plans and a Commodity Analysis report to Fue Construction Services for approval If the occupancy classification for the bulding is designated as Group S, Division 2, commodities stored shall be limited to light hazard classrfication only 7 Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Form and submit to the Fue Safety Division This form provides contact information for Fue District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property F. ~, ~ -~3 RESOLUTION NO 04-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2001-00155, TO REDUCE THE BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG VINEYARD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET, ON 1 46 ACRE OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET -AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 0209-013-15 A Recitals 1 Hamna Maghakian filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DRC2001-00155, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vanance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the subtect site, located at the northeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, with a depth that vanes from approximately 95 feet at the west property line to 35 feet at the east property line, and b The application has submitted a Variance Application requesting to reduce the building and landscape setbacks along Vineyard Avenue and 8th Streets, and c The Variance as specified in the application will not be detnmental to the goals and ob~ectrves of the General Plan or Development Code and wdl not promote detnmental conditions to the persons or properties in the immediate vianity on the subtect site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent wrath the objectives of the Development Code ~~,T lo~P PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-108 DRC2001-00155 - HARMA MAGHAKIAN September 8,2004 Page 2 b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distnct c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depnve the applicant of pnvdeges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct d That the granting of the Vanance wdl not constitute a grant of speGal pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct e That the granting of the Vanance wdl not be detnmental to the public heakh, safety, or welfare or matenally inlunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Gudelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Plamm~g Division 1) Vanance approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued wnthin 5 years from date of approval 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Butler, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS F,G,~ 105 ;x ~ - r- ,- . ~* ,s t h e c i t y o f ancno Cucamonga Staff Report DATE September 8, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16507 -HPA, INC - A request to subdivide 9 57 acres of land into four parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-05 Related file Development Review DRC2004-00109 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109-HPA, INC - A request to develop four industrial bwldmgs totaling 196,995 square feet on 9 57 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industnal Distnct (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-05 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonmg North - Industnal bwldmgs, Minimum Impact Heavy Industnal Distnct (Subarea 9) South - Industrial buildings, Minimum Impact Heavy Industnal District (Subarea 9) East - Industrial bwldmgs, General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Vacant land and industrial bwldmgs, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Heavy Industrial North - Heavy Industrial South - Heavy Industnal East - Generallndustnal West - Heavy Industrial C Site Charactenstics The subject site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use and an electrical substation To the south is an existing Industnal warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant with a gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from ITEM "H,J" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 ' Page 2 D Parking Calculations The total requred parking for the project is 175 stalls, with a total of 195 proposed parking stalls In addition to the above parking requirements, one semi-trailer parking space is required for each dock-high door The protect is in conformance with the required ratio of truck stalls ANALYSIS A General The infill industrial development contains four single-story industnal bwldings (not warehouse), which totals 196,995 square feet The bwldings are rectangular shaped, which is conducive for the intended use Access into the protect site will be off of RochesterAvenue and Boston Place Additionally, the applicant has provided outdoor eating areas for each bwlding The buildings wdl have blue medwm glazing and amulti-color paint scheme B Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on July 6, 2004, and recommended additional architectural elements and details to provide enhanced 360-degree architecture (Exhibit "D") The applicant worked with staff to address these recommendations C Technical and Grading Revew Committees The Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be a significant adverse environmental impact on • short-term air quality during site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality impact to a less-than-significant impact If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 and Development Review DRC2004-00109 through the adoption of the attached Draft Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Respectful submitt d, Brad er City Planner BB DF\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit"C"- Elevations/Landscape Exhibit "D" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated July 6, 2004 Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00109 H,~ ~ i i i I I I I _ _ _-_-__. i! ~ ~ ~a a~ _ ~ _ _.._ _ _ _ _ `1 ~T~ ~~ __ _ __ _ _, ~ - _ _-- __ -_~ h O.b.N -_- - r W ` _ ___ _1__e~,_y ___~__~_~ ______ _________ __ __ _ N may- A'-1 f ~-cr r °-B'~ ~-`- Y' I . ~ ` ~ -. -'-t. qe .~. g~t~~~Ei~t,9~8t ""~I~ @iS ~p Q ly.; tee. 1'w 3 yy •t ;~ ~ ~~ 7 131 Fl : / , rM. ~ _ 7' ~a+-_ ~~ t ,y --- ~Q -,' -,---~, i_ ~ s~~l~~~$a!l~~~~ ~~ s ,, ~-, f~_~~,. 1 i°#~ ~ ~ f~~ !' ~. '~ X11 _ ~,: FlC ' ~ . o Z •~ t ~ Q L, ' cr tt ~ _ -__ Q Q 4~ i~ ~a ~ }~ ~ ~ I ~ M ~ \ '-o ,!e F~t'1~ ~ S 3 i i ! ~ _ _ ~' M 0 ~~ B4 Bt~R g X11 p t!4 ,~1 "' ~A=- ~~ y gg4 p ! 4 3 p 3..~ 4• ' ~~ 4 e~ et@ i ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~. ~ , < gyp( ~.~>.>.~ t@~ 4 t4 ~ tg'a~ 4 , \ 1 ~ ~~ 0 Otyt ~ t(}eet f~pYg~ _~ iil ~~ -_ \ ,i ~a~pgepgSO iii ti-~88888~~d~ _ _ .I ~ t~ ~ i l n -f , , I~ ~ ~` 3, - ~ '- ~" _ „• [g t a A ~y q ~4 t ~ a ~~~t~p e 1 ~'dtq tt6 C~ ~ 'J~ 1 ~(~~'~ C i -~ - - ~`pt t 5 i333e39u it T ~ ~~ i ~,a~r : ~ e ( • ~ , { '~ 3 i 541 Ep -'-'Ye! 1i ~..- 3l~`_ _ ( _ a ~~~~ I ~ ,~ ~ ~ J~ i _ 99 ~ _ -~ p4 @4 t~~z - - - - ~~(~I.11~11 "~~ ~~ -3 otm~'H Drum E ~• R I~• R P 9 R Y_ a 5i C m C 0 d L m N d' d & 7 e ~L y6 /C ~ U4 N L W q Q ~l =~ .! i {e'1 ! "! s v S i ~p J i ~, tlt ~ . ~5!yg~ ~ a'!3R ~E ~~s" ~ .. a lt6;9 ~f~iiif aiiii~l~};i~ES~~!ipe~l~99ii4, 6e ~§§9P R~ Ia8 ~ io°• a 3« ed iigg Q Y@3 P q e¢Q~9F~~ +~ iF' ~ ~~~ S ~ ~ ~~i A ~~ ~e~4 $ ya5 ~qo~ a2 q1 3 63 s 333 it A i R~ A e~ I ~ ~, ~ ti ~i§~~ ~ y9 ,g~ B meeQ Q~p~3 3~~~6~05~ ~~e ~ 9 e i ~ ~ !~ a~AYpp AA ~3 ~ 6~C ~ ~iG 6 q Atap$ ~ Ro+. 4^• t I ag tot & yii;4~~ ~~~~ 1~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~i~s y~ e~~ Q~ ~f A3 !j ~ "" • Rc•R eg gg ~ 3' a G ~ Qs~ gtl9 y~r`1 c?eE~~QQ @~B~Y~~6~P~ae e ~~ j+. a ~~~~~ ~~,; ~ 3 g i 3 a ~a.tfa o ty / i t2 t• ~Oe~GI~ ttl l y 1 ~ g~~ 8g~; ~~~~ ~$ i ~ 4 ~~ ~q€Y e ~ ~ @ § tp ~PAP~~~~~~Q~~9 ~@ag ~g~iii~~7j8e~a e9e Qi ~Q~~ Qi~ 3s ~ iQ[eF~g ~~ €~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~°~~~ ~~~~ ~Qgpd'i~ ~I t e g y~y eaE~3~aR ~j~jQd~~p~$Qe t~S a~~S YF~6y IOpi •~R ~g q~ qg gq~g3 qQ ~ BeE ~ ~e ~~pq,~~ q;p°~~~ is ai 7A tl6f€Q q~ @ ~~M~aiQ . . • • c Ft q,~ ~Q °~ 9 e §pip) 7~p pp Q t ;~a q ~p0 3~p 3 ~~e~~~ a~ e'g~ 040~; yy' @ ~ Q Q~~~p~t 9Y ~ ~~&~ ~e~ ! 'p~~ ~ ~~ ~~~°~~ ~~ ~ I~i~ ~i~~ t ~ ~~~ ~9 ~ '.0 000 a oooeoo ~~" y f~,'/II ~ 'p ~ a fl h' Yf ~ ~ ~ it l~l l ~ ~-f-/ ~-~ O ~ '~ C a; ..E ~ 1 : . ee i n £ a Ini R. I I I I I- ~_ ~ E• m ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 I I ~ ~4 N y @' p 9 I of Nm -__~fi p d I ~ v W x I tm ~ ~ 2 CW Ic <~ __ m C I f ~ y y Z ~h E I J'l, .J I u i 9 9 ~ d5 m < W = Ig ~p ~~ ~ o ~° a ~OW~ ° ` ~~I ~tl ~@~Il ~.~t~ dt Off, 4 7~ Q °z E e ~, 8i `~ F a e ~= t &€ 6 0 < t/ Ge @ eSJ gy ~~ `~e~ LL ` ~ s ~~ }3~ 7 44 € e~P 9@3 CCCe ~'~ ~LF I s; E e t ~ o-, a~ I P{18~ I ^ ~ ~7 E ~ e~~ Iydy .~ ~pe 9 '3y q g a o I ~ ~~ er - ~ ..- a p~pp` a Y~ d ~~~' ~ g £e R ~fvxa avurm~ J i 4A@ P ~y 9~e~g~g tl~ ~~ el I -ml; e (7 ee I 3 @p I 5 ee ~~ i ~F~ f ' ' I - /f_ -- -1 !. - - g 3~ ~ ~ e <I \mJ ~U ` (OI (W) (W~ 11 5 (I ~ C g1 rl ~p~p ~~~~~g@~I~E I rI~~I~ ?~~&~@~~~ i $~~1~;~`~~€a~a~~ OG~ Oi•,UU :iCOCl3 Q° ~~ 0 €° ~R ~~~ N-,S-S [L' c ~ ! N ~ w~ UI c Z y ~ e `~ a i = i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ u $ j Q W 9 8 ' J • {~ ~yf LP W ~$ t~ q i e $ ~ ~a 9~1 ~~ ~ dg ` e i E ~ tdld eg r I Q eG~ IR ~ I 3E 9 $!~~ ~~ ! I i i l a I l l e p 6 I e Q Iea p@~ 8 j i i} 2~ II I ~~~_ ~ ~i~~s3 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 P~ I ~ 9 ~ ..... oooaoaaoo© ~~ g I e 0 W 7 0 q ©© J 1 y ~ t ~~ -- ~, 0 pTr ~u -ter N~ 2' i ~ R ~m R e 8888_ ,n N• a t `01 lU) COi rl ~LL ' S Ey ~ m ! ~ E -- , ru ' ~~ , i __'--- - 1, C O d w ,~ I - r n .. _ ± - o a ' 3 p - i _ ~i ~ . . p W ~~ ~ u C C I 4 ` E E E ~ it I li ~. W ! " ~ °~ N m N ~ 9 ~ E E C ~ N € p e i ~ ~ (L~ y 7 ! B E ~ d ~ O n ~ ~ q Q }~ ~ ~ @ ~ g ~ A E E ~_ 0 W i i ~ 5 F ~ ey ~` ° R Ey 4~ uS t T. i ~ ~~ 78X ~ e ~~ d _ ~ ~ IIM ~ ~ g §~~ ! ~ ii Y d y ~ ~ x~Pm~oo _ W ~ W t~iq F ` R E ~ i ~ Q ~ IbjB9 ]~ ~~a~ [ 1 999~ ~e!!~ ~~ e~ ul ~3y ~ g~ ~ B 1 u ~ ~: I . i o ~ ~ ~ f99 ~ ~ js ~ ~ 1 E [ ~ ~~ b I E Eq - ~ pp g 7AE tlY e_. Y.g e ~ ~ t gg ~ au .a . u ~ ~ R ~ I L ~ ~ h1~- - - f ~ ' ~ -~ - i_i ~} 1 ~~ ~. ;o, ~w~ LL~ ~ g g a a;~ ~ 3 !y ~ # e ~ ~ g s ~ iE s ~ ppyy i ~ €y S ~ €i~ ~ 5 3 Y 3 € ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ p ~ p~p 6 S @@€ °e ~ .1 ~ p B S 3 ~~~~6 g~:i5s~€i Ed 00(-J OE100 Ci CC.OC~ ( ~ Y ~ W ~ 4 R R ~ ¢ . p a e ~ _ J ~ 4 EP I~1 } a F m ~ I i - Y Y I ro I H { yy ~ i~ ii ~ ~e ~ ~ J a ~i I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Y E E ~~ ,., ~ .. I ~~~ E ~ pp ~ ~ 1 t~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ E (: _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 3oq ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 0 ' ~ - ' ~ ~ 1 yy ! 3 p 9~~3i;`o ~ l 111 ee !! 1 ' I a.. ~ I I i --- I -' E - °j y ~ {@ y ~ tl~ ~ ~~E ~ ~ ~ E ?? 3 ~0 ~ v E ' e I I ~ 4 s Aa 666 e¢ t8tEE s ~ ~ a f f C i C - _ - ¢ 7 7 [ 3 ad a { e p p p ~ ~ F _ 6 ! 8 99 ~ E f~AB A ~ A S ' _ x ~- ~ ~ . _ t_ - ' Gr_~ i - 1 ~ I x ~ E A _ ~ - ~~ 1~ ~ 1 ~ ~ IV I 1 _ , q ~r - I a ~ ~~ ~ 3 7~ I 4 . ~r • I I ~ ~ r a ~ ~ B ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~l _ ~ 5 8 ~ re 3 ~ I E ~e ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ©® I _ I 8 8 E 3 ~~~ E vOU OCi000C~000 ~~ / , / ~ _ V • i W - _ _ -- c ;H O , xc // ~~\\ U ~~ e• w ~~ O " { 3` ' m E ~q i <) ~mJ ~ (~ ~~ Y _ ~ (W) ILI j~ ~ 2 ^ ~ ~: ~: e ~ V a E 2 E~U ~; m I g i ~ I I ----- CV . `V O ~ d 4 3 E E E ~i (LLB ° N ~ F ° W - w ~ 5 y ° ~ ~ ~ d m 4 EA (~ i . ~ ' ~ C ~1 ~ ~ ~u ~ Hy ,C +~ ~ B ~ 3 ~ =n ~@j y~ ~ ~ i ; ~p ~~ ~ d L 4P ~ Z K 3¢¢¢ W ~ E = E S ~ { ~ U ! p / ~ e~ ~ p d ° 3 C Q~ q ~ ~ i E E ~ ~ O ~Nu ~ s 3 ~° 3 p EE§ ~ ryi~ Pp e2 3 Ee 4i ~ ~~ 5d ! 2 ' _ O ~ i Q ~ _ n W { ~ ~ E ~ e @! 6661 Y, glFe~ E~g @@ ~ e ~ .-rwo r ~ ~ ~ W __-___`- _ « E WD .g ~(~ ' j W z o ~ B p =i= Sgg )~ {a{ ~ kF _4 P 4$ E~;~P ~ ~ E p p~ s ~ a e ~ ~, ~ pi ~{ X yg6 99 E ~ ~ ~e ~ e~ ~~ ~g E e E ~ e pB P P Y 7 .~,...,. ~__ ; - - . l 4 C E--- -» ~- --- i~ ~ ~ - C--C E _ i ~• ~ ~ 5 7g g R i4e4 B 4 a y}4 4 9 ~~ gg qq ¢ e £ p ~` iy S ~ € !~ ~ S 41 Y g g ~sEy ~~99~ 4 6~ e i§ o p?9' Eg ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 E ~3 ~ ~ 4 €a k `/ Y~/ ( ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 M , ~ z i B~ P p a it u q ~ S y > zi F ~ I k ~ I y ru B ~~P ~~ `~' S l ` _ q y j x _ r F i F f4 S~ ~ ; E •~ °~ r ~ ~ Y~ ~ p 3; 1~ ~ p ~ q 4r iJt I - F ~ ~ i- ~i E : °tlP6ti~39(`0l I!! 1fEi ~ ~' i _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r ' o_ _ ~ ! 4 ~ P ~~~ ~~9 8~ 9 € A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~6 A _ E +..... " ~ y y pp ~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ a a 7€ } P ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yy ~ 40 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ +• I •°• 0000 OOOOOm _ ~ E ' ~ E } ` I ' 3 i a F i _ E ~ ~ ' " ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ' ~ ° a ~ RR 8 § i y J ^ a9 ~ °~ ~ e I E '- - ~ - ~ ~R A j ~ Q ki - G i l ~I g ~ C ga P q ~~ e @ ~ G ~ B 7 ~ ( P _ ~ _ dl i 9~ E4 ~ ° ~ I i _ _ f ~0 ~ P~ p { y P ~ e j ~( 6 " S Y ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ i [ E g E , 3p C 44 ~ 0 ,. _s.--- ' Y y 4 q y 5 q S q 7f1 6 0 8 8{~ ~i S S 8 i E Y ~ 1l . 3 _ UC1U UUOOGOCJOO ~ ~ ~) ~- ~ -- ~ O i F e ~") E n .~ s I ~ -I I I t i B ~p R v I I' 7 m ' I - y ' - i A l a E AI L~ ~I p m I I Ai ~ ~ a I I v , w, CJ O ~ a ~ Q ~ C~ i I ` ~ . I m ~ Y a z_ ~ = ! w 7 H ~ :a - I y ; I ~ ~ a m 3 3 5 ~ ~ W i ~ ~ y C _ ~ E a g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S} yQ~p ?4 g L W U '~ p ~ ~ + y €~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~~ y E E @ E a Y S@ ~i p ( ~ a• O O g y~ ~ M~gfi~p 9 ~ r~, - 1~ 3 of m ~~ p B 7 S 7 € {~ ~ Y ~ tl~ 9 A R~ `yi ~` on ~ 9 {~ ~ Y ~ A~ E ~ a @~ s3 a` a & { Q a 0 p o y ~ 9 p 9 p 9~~~ag~~~~~sg ~Q~ a i y l' e xm ciero uq E ~ z y AA ~flp p Y' ~ ie~ ~ ~ Y4 e ` _ -~~ a ~ .~ r a]~ R I ~ y i `__J Q p~ a ~ ~I ~ yq ~ ]SEE 1 , - s g aa# € $ ~ _ ~ ~ - - F § ~@ Y 8 ~ - ~ @ ~ a ~ 3 1 N ~ {~ s ~t~ ~ ; 1 (6 U IW~ ILL ~ ~J IVl _ I W x I g ~ 1 MQ ¢6 ~ ~ y € ~ y f ~ ~~ ~ 8 ~ ~ g~ aa ~ @ ~ qq a 6 6~~f~;~xi~ 9[!E3 OGO 000 ~ OuC>uG 0 y Y 0 U C W ~- L ' 1~ e __ 4 I ~- d ~ ~~ ~ I 1 1 ` 9 y ~ - { x - I ` ~ s~~~ ~ ~I B - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ '' ~ ~ ~ ~?etp ~ y y ~ I ~ ° I ' ~ ° ~ ~ ~ i E I - ~ s~ y a ~ _ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ i€ 3 j - - - x ~ ~ ~e ~ 1 a I e y 3 c ~ a - a I ~« ~~ a ~ ~ ~ y ~ 03 3 ~ ~ F! f a s !}! e _ _ ~8 ~~j 9 ~33 ~~2 3 y _ g ~ A .. I - ~ ~ ai ~ ~ } pp 7~ i ~ [ ~i~ ~k~ f{ p P I ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ { ~ I a ~ I - ...- P f 9 0000000 00 - @ # 1 0 G - a `~ ` I y l - 1 e _ - ~ d ~ - I i I Q ~_ 8 C _ I I B , _ . _ I - ~ I ~ c I I I _ ~ EE a J~ y a a ~ y ~ 1 I I a l I I eaa 3 g e 3 !2 c~ ~~ `fl ° p g ! f C i 8~~0~@eAAf€tEi ~ 1 000.,00007000 ~® C ~, J y C~ tt09W4 U1t1 o84 me~~RJ rmaR+v I mwr~rW-avMU rn r~~nwva~ oi~'aux ivus vume..~i v +ew~n'.ivwWrt sion wsnwv ~j p e f ~ F . +r+~~=..w~ois ' ~~[] `S3J1ATI3S 3StliS3 JRltld SS3HISf19 ZI3iS3HJ02[ g 4 O ~ ~~ 9dVJSaNtl 12I3.L[3C1H '7V321 i210dM3N ~ § " Ntl1d 9NLLNYld AlStlf~'dTdlld ~ ~ ~ `M ~ ~ ~ F E ~ BtldB kY ~ ~~r `.q ~ ~ii~ i~ S atatai ~~~~ ~~ i§!! 3i ~ di~13i 3~~4 ~I ~ ~~ ~il~~( ~~~la~~ 9 ~~ ~~t~~€ ~~I~~~~~~ ~ ~3 Q €~0 D W J p ~ ;~ ~! 4 i 3 i • f! t ~€ i9id R~ ~ ~ 4 ~ t ip 6~9 I~ ~~ f~S[ ~ ~ 3i$i4 ~~ 0~ ~~ ~~ F£ ~~ ~~ i~ ~4 /~}~1 ~e~ O®®OV©~ 6 ~., ~,, ~~;~ J: ~'/ fr)~ ~ I DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 8 00 p m Doug Fenn July 6, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16507- FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 9 57 acres of land into four parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Distract (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue - APN 0229-111-OS Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00109 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS - A request to develop four industrial buildings totaling 196,995 square feet on 9 57 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue - APN 0229-111-05 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507. Desion Parameters The subject site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard To the north is the heavy industrial steel forgery, Schlosser Forge Company To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex The site is vacant and with a gentle slope from north to south, and it presently drains from north to south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subject site The infill industrial development contains four single-story industrial buildings (not warehouse), which total 196,995 square feet The buildings are rectangular shaped, which is conduave for the . intended use Access into the prolect site will be off of Rochester Avenue and Boston Place. Additionally, the applicant has provided outdoor eating areas for each building The buildings have a nominal amount of 360-degree architectural elements The buildings do not have two primary materials as was directed by staff to add The buildings do not evoke a quality and contrast that has been submitted by the applicant in previous industrial warehouse type projects The building will have blue medwm performance glazing and amulti-color paint scheme. The map portion of the prolect is for financing purposing Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this prolect 1 Architecture -The applicant needs to provide at least two primary materials Staff recommends the bwlding reflect the richness and contrast of the existing industrial bwldings to the south of the site (which were also designed by HPA Architects) 2 The entire portion of Building "A" that fronts along Rochester Avenue should reflect a professional office facade 3 Ali screen walls between the gates of the building must be decorative to match the proposed architectural style of the protect 4 Call out the material of the decorative paving at all entryways into the prolect site DRC AGENDA SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS July 6, 2004 Page 2 5 The applicant must better depict how trucks can make the turn radius between all of the building entry points to the loading area Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 Parapets are to be high enough so as to screen all roof-mounted egwpment The warehouse areas of the building do not appear to have sufficient parapet to screen any HVAC units 2 Transformers should be screed by decorative concrete tilt-up wall Provide trellis over each of the outdoor employee eating areas Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the prolect design without discussion Paint roll-up doors to match the building elevations No exterior downspouts are to be visible on any of the bwldings Landscaping should surround the trash enclosures Staff Recommendation Staff recommends redesign of the prolect and return at the discretion of the Committee as either a consent or full item Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present Fong, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant came to the meeting prepared with revised elevations that depicted sandblasting instead of lust concrete tilt up However, staff informed the Committee that the additional changes were minimal and that more sandblasting and spandrel glass should be used on Bwlding "A "The Committee agreed with staff and also recommended that all of the bwldings should have additional architectural elements and details that wrap around the bwldmgs to prowde a 360-degree architecture The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff, and once the aforementioned items were addressed to the satisfaction of staff, then the prolect can be scheduled for City Planner review and approval ~~~-~~ ENVIRONMENTAL . r INFORMATION FORM '~ f (Part I -Initial Study) Crty o! Rancho Cucamonga Planning ~IVlslOn (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the Clty of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is Important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOTBEPROCESSED Please note that it /s the rosponsibillty o/the applicant to ensure that the appOcahon Is complete at the hme of submittal, CRy slat/ will not be available to perform work regwred to provide missing mformahon Apphcahon Number /or the pro/ect to which this loan pertains Protect Tnle Rochester Business Park Name & Address otpro/act owner(s) Saxes Regis o,,n 18802 Bardeen Ave. Irvine CA 92612 Phone• 949 756 5959/Fax• 949.756.5955 Name B Address of developer or protect sponsor Fullmer Construction 1725 S. Grove Ave, Ontario, CA 91761 Phone: 909.947.9467/Fax: 909.947.5241 Contact Person & Address FYanc1s Wang, HPA Inc. 4931 Birch St -Ste A, Newport Beach CA 92660 Phone: 949.863.1770, Ext. 108/Fax: 949.863.0851 Name 8 Address otperson pn:panng this form (if d~Berent from above) Same as above. Telephone Number ,/' EnwronmentallnfoFormt doc ` 'i/ Page 1 of 9 I~,S~Z Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM PROJECT INFORMATION b DESCRIPTION: '1) Provide a /ull scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ec[ site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set o/color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site lrom the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of sign cant /eatures from the site Include a map showing /ocabon o(each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) $626 Eochester Ave. r Rancho Ghcatttonga Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not regmred of non-constructwn CUP's unless othenv~se requested by staff 4J Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet i1 necessary) APN 0229-111-OS '6) Gross Site Area (ac/sq ft) 9.57 Acres '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 9.57 Acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach additional sheet i/necessary) N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which wdl be necessary from the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to /ully implement the pro/ect A C~ 9J Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists be/ore the pro/ect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs o/ significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) Flat vacant land with a few existing trees at the northwest corner. No structures on site. EnvironmentallnfoFonnl doc Page 2 of 9 I~,~ -13 Createtl on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM f0) Descnbe the known cultural and/or h/stoncal aspects o(the site Cde all sources of /n(ormabon (books, pubpshed reports and oral h/story) Vacant land. 11) Descnbe any nose sources and the/r levels that now affect the site (alrc2R, roadway nose, etc) and how they wilt affect proposed uses N/A 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect In detail Th/s should provide an adequate descnphon of the site In terms o/ u/hmate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect Indicate d there are proposed phases ror development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the ant~apated comp/etlon o/each Increment Attach addd~onal sheet(s) dnecessary Four utdustrial warehouse buildings are proposed for the 9.57-acre site. A truckyazd is provided for each building along with the frre lane hammerhead per the Fire Departtnent's standard. landscape and parking aze provided per the City's requirements. EnvvonmentallnfoFonnl doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM µ,S-~4 • 13) Describe the surroundmg properties, mcludmg m(ormahon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scemc aspects Indicate the type ofland use (res~dent~al, commeraal, etc J, mtensrty o/land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) basting warehouse buildings at the north side of the property. Vacant land at the east and west sides of the property. Three industrial buildings at the south side. 14) Will the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area o/ the pro/ect~ N/A 15) Indurate the type of short-term and long-term nose to be generated, mc/udmg source and amount How will these nose levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods ofsoundproofing are proposed N/A '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scemc trees N/A 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) mto which the site drams N/A M EnwronmentallnfoFOnnt doc Page 4 of 9 Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM ~{-~S -IS 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For (uRher clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercial/Ind (gaVday/ac) 500 peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank {] Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge [o a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further c/anfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b CommeraaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: N/A 20) Number of residential units Detached (indicate range o(paroel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether units are renlal or for sale units) 21) Anticipated range of sale prates and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anticipated household srze by unR type • EnvironmentallnloFOrm1 dot Page 5 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM y~, S -i ~ 24) Indicate the expected number o(school children who will be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary b Junwr Hrgh c Senior Hrgh COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 26J Describe type o/use(s) and ma/or (unchon(s) of commercial, industrial or insbtuhonal uses Industrldl warehouse use. 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or mshtuhona/ uses by type Total Warehouse Area: 188,275 s.f. Office T.I.: 8,720 s.f. 27) lnd~catehoursofoperatron $:00 a.m, - 5:00 p.m.r Nbnday through Friday ~~ 28) Number o/employees Maximum Shin Time of Maximum Shifl 29J Provide breakdown of anticipatedlob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classficatron (attach adddional sheet d necessary) N/A -Spec Buildings 30) Eshmahon of the number o/workers to be hired that currently reside m the Cdy 120 ~~ '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the souroe, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) Total EnvironmentallnfoFonnl doc Page 6 of 9 ~i --~ ^ I rl Created on 6/22/2002 4 09 PM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine then abdrty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ It so, please indicate their response CCWD has been contacted. Service is tentatively agreed. Staff conference review has been done by the City agencies. ~/QQfiia~ai~?/+g'r' /Z!/'1'~` /~/E'G 7-riv3 - G~~'7~ 33) In the known history o! this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s~ Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, radroacbve substances, pesbades and herbicides, /ue/s, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/ the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i/known Vacant land. 34) Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or towc matena/s, including but not limited to those examples listed above2 I(yes, provide an inventory o/all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans N/A I hereby certi/y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that add~bonal information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date 02/03/04 Signature ne ~~1~//7~G7 EnvironmentallntoForml doc Page 7 of 9 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM N-~J-Ig 12501 v~1 ~~ II ~i ~ v __ µ _ - _ II ~ _- I _ ___ ___ II I' ~ I~ I~ re ^ /~ ~~ • ~I II ~// `_J ~IZZO~t, II II IIl _______= I I k n ,~~~I ° ~~/zza ~i ill D °/1/J a /10] h FOOT SS.. ~ 6LVD _ cl . . y t n ~~ II 1 ~/ II ~ II _ 1q~ II I i I I u •. II III II ~\i- II • II 119° II II d 1~ II ~ •~ _______________-~~________________ _I II ; i~ II i II. />~ • 1 / II II //)p II ~ II ~ /i L II II II @ ~ II ~ I WI ARROW u6 /JSa .I 1/50 if ,/50 o Ri I ic3. ; i . ~ • 1.. ~ •. Avwr /oo _ ~ - Ehw Joel •. c '~ 11 --~~i/~j NTR iFE EKA N II sT Rochester I ~ •\ II II _ ~' ~ Power la 4 ~ I ___ _ __ _ _ - ' I•~l • ~ FEE( ___________ ___ _ ---- ----__-- -------- =,W w_ _ - -I II A O ~ u ® _ • I II II _ _ ~~~ _ _ _ . ~~_~_~' \I I~ II • ~ • I __ II ~ • II it 110° II - 1 ~ ®~ ~ ~ _" ell n _ ~~ --~ 1f ~C .I~ II II /°I \ I I II n ,_______ II ii /oeo II _______ •~. ~\/Olp TH ~ T ______ I I ' _______~~_ ~_ ___~_______====,s~F===-===~weli---= 1 GUASTI, CALIF. ~° - • ~„ ! II ° II {I n II 0>0 1 SE/1 ONTARIO IS OUADRANCLE a 'I ii rt N3400-W11730/7 5 < I'I' o n II I ~ 1966 Z ~ ~ i i p Ili ii PHOTOREVISED '1981 F I; ' -~ /oso II i ,oso~ DMA 2452 11 SE-SERIES VH83 ~ w „ ~ Well ~il II O II u - vJO 'osc II 0 ' RANCHO I CA I CORP BDY ~'~ ' E I SA BERNARD/ r av--- __~_-__ -__= BOUNDARY nl i ~ ~~ ~ III II a„ ~e ~a oResery~9 I ~O~` n .~0 =~ I II \~ ~f ~ /030 i .d: i ~~~ sm=a~ ~ II n w III/ '~ [ ' DWA'1' u I lu /010 I ~k ilio.: 1 y n n II \~~ 3~'A'i 1' m ~ 'I =pdtl~e 'I ill \ rc 1 ,~IQy~_ • ~~ ~~-.- v° III H4 2~1 ;; ai8; ,~ ~~A FREEWAY u ~ _I al `~ oG~~ a ~ ~~990 _ _ ____ - r~ 9B0 _ _ _ __. .wr E L • e .. ,1, 963 - >s ~ / II n II II , •~ II W I ~ I y0 > I .~ 9 I I u Q II U II / u ° ii a it n • li I o I / ~' 1'; li II 950 II ( y50 n __.__ _ __ __ _ l I, ~' ~ u ~ - n Ili 9J6 __ - II II ~ III ~/.'l Ij II I i ~'u II II ~~~ I ////^~I .. II o I F~ ,~ n0~\ l r~ ~ ~ --- -- -- - -- - --- -- - - - - t~ '~'A I west south Site Plan Rochester Business Park 0 0 SARES REGIS GROUP HPA, INC BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Fde• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109 Related Files TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM16507 Description of Protect DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS - A request to develop four industrial buildings totaling 196,995 square feet on 9 57 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industral District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-05 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16507- FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide 9 57 acres of land into four parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located at 8226 Rochester Avenue -APN 0229-111-OS Related files Development Review DRC2004-00109 2. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address Francs Wang HPA Archdects 4931 Birch Street, Suite A Newport Beach CA 92660 3 General Plan Designation Heavy Industrial 4 Zoning Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) 5 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The subject site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use with an electrical substation To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant with a gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue There are no mature trees on the subtect site 6. Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7. Contact Person and Phone Number Douglas Fenn, Assoaate Planner (909)477-2750 8. Other agencies whose approval is requved (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None -},~-a 1 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report. EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 • N-~S~a LJ r1 ILJ L~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16607 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources OHazards & Hazardous Matenals ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services O UtihUes/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ORecreation (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Au Quality (/) Geology/Sods ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/1"raffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect in this case because revisions m the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLAR TION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated py[suant t that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation sure are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared By Reviewed Date V / ,~,,,~// Date rP ~ Z Z ~~q'- {+, ~ a3 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Then $ipnd¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Foianlially Sipn~LCant won M,apaaon roan SBndmanl No I ect Inca aletl I an I an EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The subtect site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use with an electrical substation To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant with a gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subtect site Evidence of reoccurring discing for weed abatement purposes is evident The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines less than 66Kv and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant H-~~'-~~ IL r1 u Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Then SipmStant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sigml¢ant With Mniga9on Than Significant No I ap Inco rate0 I ad I att 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh existing zoning for agricultural use, or O O O (/) a W illiamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The subfect site is located between Boston Place and Rochester Avenue and is north of an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Arrow Route The site is vacant and with gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subfect site Evidence of reoccurring discing for fire abatement purposes is evident The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the site There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-thud is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mafor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for whrch the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The subfect site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use with an electrical substation To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant and with gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subfect site Evidence of reoccurring discing for weed abatement purposes is evident This site has not been used for agricultural use for over ten years and there are no nearby sensitive uses No adverse impacts are anticipated H, S aS Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Tftan Sigmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgmhcant won Mitigation roan Sipni6cant Nc I aM Inco oratetl I act I an 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality wolaUon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments. r1 u a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the • pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low- emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was H-, J -cam initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Sigmhcant Less Issues and Supporting informatton Sources Potentially Signd¢ant wan Mitigation roan Sigmhcant No I act Inco rated I act I an investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAt3MD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result o1 hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water l]uality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWaC6) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated }+ j -~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than SigmM1Cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g I=ntem~auy Sigmhcant wpm Miagaaon man Signtl¢ant No I act Inca ratetl I act Im act on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a prolect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The prolect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within i/a-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located more than i/z-mile from the nearest sensitive receptor the West Valley Detention Center and Juvenile Detention Center Light industrial business park use is not expected to generate toxic air contaminants The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for hazardous materials will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for odors will be evaluated at the time of tenant improvement plan check and business license No adverse impacts are anticipated ~J ~-~ j a 8 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than SiBnibcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgmbcant won Maigabon roan Sigrnticent No I aM Inca retetl I atl 1 ect 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either dvectly or O O U l/ ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The site is not located within the Delhi Soils sensitive biological resource area of the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly according to General Plan Exhibit IV-3 The subtect site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use with an electrical substation To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant and a gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subtect site Reoccurring discing for weed abatement purposes is evident • b) The subtect site is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, between Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route To the north is a steel forge manufacturing use with an electrical substation To the south is an existing industrial warehouse complex, which fronts along Jersey Boulevard The site is vacant and with a gentle slope from north to south The site presently drains from the north to the south The site has no public improvements of sidewalk, curb, and gutter along Rochester Avenue, except for Boston Place There are no mature trees on the subtect site The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural ~'~5~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Signd¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenLally s~en~+~=zn, Wlih Mmganon Then signin=am N= I act Inco rated 1 ad 1 act communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed Also see comments noted under a) above for additional documentation No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the O O O (/) significance of a historical resource as defined In § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O (/) O ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those O O O (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value.` I -~-/ ~ ~Q ~1 LJ r 1 L J Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than Sipnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polanhally $ipndv;anl won Mihpahon roan Sipmficant No I act Inco reteE I act I ect • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEDA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be Implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure (curb, gutter, and streets), surrounding developments and annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated ~~~- ~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less men Sipnificanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pelamielly Sipnihcant wen Maipeaon rasa Sipntl¢ant No I atl Inca atetl 1 as I act 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) ui) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O U (/) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and R is not in an Earthquake Fautt Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fautt, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red HIII Fautt, passes approximately 2 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 00 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 8 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Soil types on-site consist of Delhi fine sand , ~~ 3- ~a ~_ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Tian SiBnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotennally SigniTCant wnn MiLganon Tnan Signilicant No I act Inco ratetl I act I aq according to General Plan Exhibit V-3, with the moderate to high potential for bare soil blowing if left unprotected Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aqufer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Delhi fine sand, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga LOAMY SAND soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils typically have high permeability and runoff is slow to very slow Delhi fine sand can be nearly level to strongly sloping The protect site has very gentle grades in southerly direction No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect O O O (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school ~~, T -33 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Then SignJicam Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources pp g Potenaally Signiswnt With Mingamn Than Sigmhcant No I act Inco oratetl I act I aM d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a Ilst of O O O (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would It create a significant hazard to the public or the envlronment~ e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the protect area g) Impair Implementation of or physically Interfere with () () () (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, Intury or death Involving wlldland fires, Including where wlldlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are Intermixed with wlldlands~ Comments: a) The protect well not Involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The Clty participates In a countywide Interagency coalition that Is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that Is more comprehensive than any other In the state The Clty has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste well reduce the potential for slgmflcant Impacts to a level less-than-slgnlflcant The proposed Industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The potential for hazardous materials well be evaluated at the time of tenant Improvement plan check and business license No adverse Impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not Include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The proposed Industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no deflmtlve users at this time The potential for hazardous materials wdl be evaluated at the time of tenant Improvement plan check and business license The Clty participates In a countywide Interagency coalition that Is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that Is more comprehensive than any other In the state The Clty has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels well reduce the potential for significant Impacts to a level less-than-slgnlflcant No adverse Impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within Ya-mile of the protect site The protect site Is located within a f/z-mile of the nearest existing or proposed school The proposed Industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculatwe with no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code regwres that all uses within this Subarea S "to be operated so as not to ~-~, S -~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less roan Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenually SiBnihcam won Micgaaon man Significant No I act Into te0 I act I emit matter causing unpleasant odors, which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed industrial building protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No Impact Is anticipated e) The site Is not located within an airport land use plan and Is not within 3/< mile of a public airport The protect site Is located approximately 2 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and Is offset north of the flight path No impact Is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, Is located approximately 6 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Flre District In the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse Impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the Clty according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site Is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would [he protect O O O (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () (/) () ( ) Intertere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () (/) () ( ) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, In a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount of surface runoff In a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site~ lit 5 -~5 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Sprufitant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotenLally SipndiWnt w,tn Mrtipa9on Than Sigeuficenl No I ct lirco ate0 I n Irtpacl e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) structures which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems ' b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The following mitigation measure shall be implemented • u Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Sgmhcant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Significant wrtn Mingauon Tnan SigmLCam No I act Inco ratetl I aq I azt 2) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to Issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result In flooding on- or off-site No Impacts are anticipated e) The protect well cause changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result In flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase In the amount of suspended solids In surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality Impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution 3) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Ouallty Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 4) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area Is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially Improved and ~+, S -3~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Sigmhcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigmhcant With Mitigation Than Significant No 1 eM Inco rate0 1 ect I act provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservovs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community O O U (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The rough graded site is vacant The proposed protect should not create any conflicts with the existing land uses in the area and should remain consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan for the site The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The land use designation of the protect site is Industrial The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan ~~~, l...J f},1 38 Inltlal Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 less Than Signdcant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pp g Potentially Signtlu am with Mitigation Than Significant No i aM Inco orafetl 1 as I act Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () (/) () ( ) levels in excess of standards established m the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the wcinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments. a) The industrial uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce noise levels that would affect adtoining properties The Citys Development Code requires that all uses in the Minimum Impact Heavy industrial District (Subarea 9) be operated in a manner so as to not generate noise level exceeding 85Ldn as measured at the lot line of the source The protect site is within an area of traffic noise levels, from the I-15 Freeway, exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 today and at even higher levels at build-out in the year 2020 The City's standard is 65Ldn and 85Ldn for interior and exterior noise levels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) According to General Plan Exhibit V-11, conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will suffice without any special noise insulation regwrements The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed bwlding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy- duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts `'-J~~ I initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than S,gmhcanf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potent,ally signn,cam With Mmgaaon Than s~gn,wam No I act Inco ratetl I an I act 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if nose levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted b) The industrial uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce groundborne vibrations The Citys Development Code regwres that all uses in Subarea 9 be operated in a manner so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average persons beyond 600 feet from where the source is located As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a)response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 5 miles of a public airport Located approximately 2 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 6 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, O O O (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments. a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population rowth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new i L_~ 9 { ~ J ~ `~ r~ LJ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than SigrvM1Cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant Wnh ALapaaon Than Significant No I act Inco ratetl I act I act employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed prolect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired trom within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts assoaated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services O O O (/) a) Fire protechon~ b) Police protectioM () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public tacihties~ O O O (/) Comments• a) The site will be served by a fire station located approximately 75 miles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard Conditions of Approval from the Undorm Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated ~1 LJ b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School Distnct and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The prolect will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately Yz-mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will require the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in ~15~ J~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially S,gnihcam won Mmgaaon roan Significant No I act Into letl ~ R ~ ecf the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld- out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the faality would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or O O O (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 2 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A Standard Condition of Approval will regwre the developer to Pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic which is, substantial in O O O (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either mdiwdually or cumulatively, a level O O O (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks N~ 7 -~a C~ Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 CJ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Signihcam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g Potenuaily $IgrohWllt Wnh MIIIgdaOO man 9gmfican[ No I ct Incorporated I act I ad d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be requued to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) This industrial park protect consists of four light industrial buildings totaling 196,995 square feet (including mezzanine area) The protect will generate 205 two-way peak hour trips which is less than the 250 two-way peak hour trips threshold for non-retail land use under the Countywide Congestion Management Plan The protect is in an area that will be developed with all proposed and tie into existing street The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be requred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 2 Yz miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the Rochester Avenue street frontage The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for ail emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and wdl, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) H; S ~~3 Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less TM1an Sigrugcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g FolenLelly Sign+M1Cant wnn MiLgacon Than SignlficaM No I Inm mte0 1 I 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Regwre or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted O O O (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next la/rg/estl'consumer of water at 20 percent ~j ~' I • C~ • Initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Then ' Signrt¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially Sigmhcant Wrth Miogaeon Than Significant No I ad Inco oratetl Irtpacl I act Based on the proposed use and size, the protect does not fall under the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221, and, therefore, would not require a Water Supply Assessment The CVWD has an adopted master plan that estimated water demand and supply needs until the year 2030 The CVWD is responsible for collecting developer fees for the construction and operation of water and wastewater facilities Proposed water usage and sewer flows would be m accordance with what was determined at the time of the General Plan adoption, and ~s not considered significant The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticpated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () (/) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or mdirectly~ Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial and office/professional uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological reTsourc/e's~ initial Study for DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than $ignihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigmhcant Wnh M~tiga9on Than Sign,ficent No I aM Inco tetatl I act I ad b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels i J~_ 1 , .~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00109 and SUBTPM16507 Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Crnc Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature ~i/ ~) Date ~' ~° Pnnt Na nd Title ~1 ~u~7 lit/ ~ ~~~j y~ ~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declarahon ~s being arculated for public review m accordance with the Cal~forma Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Prolect File No.• Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM16507 and Development Review DRC2004-00109 Public Review Period Closes: September 8, 2004 Prolect Name Prolect Applicant Francis Wang, HPA, Inc Prolect Location (also see attached map) Located at 8226 Rochester Avenue - APN 0229-111-05 Protect Description A request to subdivide 9 57 acres of land into four parcels and to develop four industrial buildings totaling 196,995 square feet in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following fmdmg ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially signihcant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be required Reasons to support this fmdmg are included m the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. September 8, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By r 1 ~J ~l • RESOLUTION NO 04-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16507, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 9 57 ACRES OF LAND INTO FOUR PARCELS IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9), LOCATED AT 8226 ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0229-111-05 A Reatais 1 HPA Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16507, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referted to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurted B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission . of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on September 8, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to vacant property located at 8226 RochesterAvenue, and b The application proposes the subdivision of 9 57 acres into four parcels, and c The application, in con~unct~on with Development Review DRC2004-00109, proposes the construction of four industnal bwldings totaling 196,995 square feet, and d The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentatve Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and I~-, S -~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 2 c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~on set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval of this parcel map is granted subtect to vacation of the 70-foot wide access easement along the north portion of the property pnor to final map recordation or issuance of building permits, whichever comes . first y-~ ~ -z50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 3 Enoineenno Department 1) The removal of the dnveway serving the adjacent property to the north necessitates the removal of its nght-tum lane and replacement with curb and gutter All work is to be done according to City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 2) Vacate the 70-foot wide access easement along the north portion of the site from the adjacent property owner and record said vacation Alternatively, have the property owner sign the parcel map to acknowledge the vacation 3) The following shall be processed pnor to bwiding permit issuance a) The lot line adjustment b) Vacate the nght-of-way beyond 50 feet of the Rochester Avenue centerline (can be done on the parcel map) 4) The developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electnc service, and shall construct electncal distnbution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility regwrements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility The Rancho Cucamonga Municipality Utility shall be the electncal service provider for all related development 5) Provide at least 75 feet of stacking distance (distance between the street face of the curb to the nearest edge of a parking stall perpendicular to the dnve aisle) at the dnveway entrance on Rochester Avenue to comply with the City's Engineenng Division Dnveway Policy 6) Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) signed by the owner 7) Provide dnve approaches, which shall be constructed per City Standard Drawing 101 Type C Sidewalk shall cross the dnve approaches at the 0-inch curb face and radius of the curb returns shall equal the distance from the curb face to the near edge of the sidewalk and be between 6 5 and 20 feet Dnveway accent paving shall be located outside of the public nght-of-way Provide additional nght-of-way as needed to encompass sidewalks Environmental Mitigation ,4ir Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and ~~-~ ~ -mil PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 4 maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construcbon contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Av Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) Ali construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions r~, ~J Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Gty if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board }}~ J -5a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 5 [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requmng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , m excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeGal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, ~1~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 6 important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruc4on field survey of the proled site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoGated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to ali inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ~~~-5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8, 2004 Page 7 Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 2) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse r1 LJ 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Dvision The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Dvision If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ~~1-5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-109 SUBTPM16507 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA, INC September 8 2004 Page 8 • ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS J-}-~ f --~'!o City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 1 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As morntonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 l+~ 5-5~1 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements oradditions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after wntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requrng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits MITIGATION MONITORING CHE~LIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) • Project File No.: SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 Applicant: Francis Wang, HPA Architects Initial Study Prepared by: Doug Fenn Date: June 16, 2004 .~ Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City verrfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPICE C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and pro/ected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 1 of 6 L~ .. ... ~. ~. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to ad/acent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Revew of plans AIC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews wail shut off equipment when not in use Ail industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 regwnng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) ~6 • f~~ i • - ~ . .. All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpoois ' All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D p/g more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes 3 of 6 ~~ I p6 Y • -. • -. . .. - • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Revew of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruchon CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actwdies elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately dnrert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary a report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods ~ ~_'~ _ ~~~ ~" a i, ,, ~~ ~ r~ -' The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 • 4~6 • s ~ `'~ L W .. ~. .: : . Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During q q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactroe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise _ ~ - Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 5 of 6 .. a . .. . • . .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A q standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Droision The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted r~ av v~wem ma I1YY~GYIOV VIIp ~~ y Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or designee BO -Building Official or designee A -With Each New Development B -Prior To Construction C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion A - On-site Inspection 8 -Other Agency Permit /Approval C -Plan Check D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Cdation COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM16507 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 9 57 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: FRANCIS WANG, HPA LOCATION: 8226 ROCHESTER AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file rn the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- _/_/ ~"~" ri f ''~P5 Project No SUBTPM16507 Comolehon Date 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance • 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 3 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is requred along Rochester Avenue E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete ail actions requved by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/ `•t l ~ "' rG Protect No SUBTPM16507 Completion Date a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM16507) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Bulding and Safety Division H. Site Development ~ 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (SUBTPM16507) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Diwsion for availability of the Code Adoption Ordrnance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shat l provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _!_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for regwred occupancy separations _/_/_ 1j ~~~ Project No SUBTPM16507 Completion Date 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ . 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/_/_ J. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/~_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submttted at the _/~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /~_ submitted, and approved by the Bulding and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/~_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/~_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint ~_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded pnor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or ~_/_ noted on the final map L. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (intenorstreets, drainagefaalities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentatroe map shall be constructed to Ctty Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees r~ LJ 4 ~-,~-fig Protect No SUBTPM76507 2 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter 0.C Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Tratl Other Rochester Avenue X X (c) X X X (e) Boston Place X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Curbside drains 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty • Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless othenvlse specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or Lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Comolehon Date / / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/-/ / / -~-~- ~_~- ~157-~0 I Protect No SUBTPM16507 Completion Date Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subtect to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits or final map approval, whichever comes first Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Gty Rochester Avenue Foreground Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fdl-up Background Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5 ft 25 tt o c 15-gal Fill-up populneus Boston Place Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 tt o c 15-gal FIII-up 4Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfili soil amendments, as determined by the Ciry inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only M. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be tiled wdh the City Engmeer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer / / -~-~~ / / ~~_ • _/_l- _/~_ 6 ~t ~-~ Protect No SU8TPM76607 N. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects O. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable ii at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Comolenon Date -~-~- / / / / _/_1_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 10, 2004 Rochester Ave Industrial DRC 2004-00109, DRC2003-00974 & SUBTPM16507 (4) Industnal buddmgs THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants• a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/mdustnal protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants mmulti-family residential protects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, Industnal or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As requred by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A mirnmum of forty-feet (40') from any bwldmg If any portion of a facility or bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwldmg, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided ~~~ "~~ g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed prolect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fue District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provde regwred fire flow ' 3 Fire protection water plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Bwlding permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire spnnkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet The sprinkler system must be monitored by a listed Central Station Fire Alarm System FSC-5 Fire Alarm System Pnor to any installation removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwldmg or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specfications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures is' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwldmg Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions N"i S '-73 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The mirnmum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry'median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adfacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 CommeraaUlndustnal Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not regwred to be motorized 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval F~5- ~y 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Frwt Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials • • High-Pde Combustible Storage (HPS) Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refngeration Systems Repau Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in venting stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within froe (5) working days, if requested by the owner • l~l~-~J FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review all requests for alternate method, when District "Application for Alternate Method" form review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwldmg or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included m the agreement The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fue mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adiacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or 5 N-f ~'" Flo e Is shared by multiple owners Please prowde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans ~s required prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" 6 ~,3-nn PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or drroeway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- sitefire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fue flow available must meet or exceed the requred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power). Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fve alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino 7 County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services . 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distnct use in the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector r1 LJ 8 ~I~ r h I RESOLUTION NO 04-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00109, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP FOUR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 196,995 SQUARE FEET ON 9 57 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9), LOCATED AT 8226 ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-111-OS A Recitals 1 HPA, Inc filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2004-00109, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 8th day of September 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on September 8, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to in-fill properties located at the 8226 Rochester Avenue, adtacent to other similar industrial uses, and b The application contemplates the construction of four industrial warehouse buddmgs totaling 196,995 square feet, and c The proposed protect, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan, and b The design or improvements of the proposed protect is consistent with the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and I~! ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page 2 • The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The proposed protect is not likely to cause senous public health problems 4 Based upon the facts and mfomtation contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect Hall have a sigmficant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been . reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are I~sted below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Cal~fomia Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval of Development Review DRC2004-00109 is granted subfect to vacation of the 70-foot wide access easement along the north portion of the property pnor to final map recordation or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first 2) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as viewed from adfacent properties and street 3) No chain Imk fenang is permitted ~~~ ~ v PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page 3 4) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for outdoor employee eating areas 5) Truck parking spaces shall be a minimum of 14 feet wide by 50 feet deep Engineennp Department 1) The removal of the dnveway serving the adtacent property to the north necessitates the removal of its nght-tum lane and replacement with curb and gutter All work is to be done according to City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 2) Vacate the 70-foot wide access easement along the north portion of the site from the adtacent property owner and record said vacation Altematrvely, have the property owner sign the parcel map to acknowledge the vacation 3) The following shall be processed pnor to building permit issuance a) The lot Ime adjustment b) Vacate the nght-of-way beyond 50 feet of the Rochester Avenue centerime (can be done on the parcel map) 4) The developer shall execute a Lme Extension Agreement for electnc service, and shall construct electncal distnbution facilities m accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility The Rancho Cucamonga MumGpality Utility shall be the electncal service provider for all related development 5) Provide at least 75 feet of stacking distance (distance between the street face of the curb to the nearest edge of a parking stall perpendicular to the dnve aisle) at the dnveway entrance on Rochester Avenue to comply with the City's Engineenng Division Dnveway Policy 6) Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) signed by the owner 7) Provide dnve approaches, which shall be constructed perGtyStandard Drawing 101 Type C Sidewalk shall cross the dnve approaches at the 0-inch curb face and radws of the curb returns shall equal the distance from the curb face to the near edge of the sidewalk and be between 6 5 and 20 feet Dnveway accent paving shall be located outside of the public nght-of-way Provide additional nght-of-way as needed to encompass sidewalks • I}i5'8a` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page 4 . Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the pro/ect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in • SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall inGude the following provisions • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to ad/scent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements 1~,3-83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page 5 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altematrve fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs regwnng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) . 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speGal qualities as a theme or focal point f~fJ J0~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September S, 2004 Page 6 Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follovnng appropnate CEQA gwdehnes Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation momtonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow . the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed . 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes ~i ~ -$5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page 7 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Qualrty 1) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect descnption and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 2) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Division The said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~l~-~~O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-110 DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA INC September 8, 2004 Page S . BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS `~ ~-~J-g`~ n u City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 1 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All morntoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,QCAp 91730 I~7- v 0 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 -FRANCIS WANG, HPA ARCHITECTS Page 2 • 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the pro/ect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 Ail MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel The pro/ect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure . attached hereto is not occumng The pro/ect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits '-g~ ~ f~J MITIGATION MONITORING CHE LIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM16507 AND DRC2004-00109 Applicant: Francis Wang, HPA Architects Initial Study Prepared by: Doug Fenn Date: June 16, 2004 ~``11 c--1 i , .. Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPICE C Revew of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 1 of 6 . - -. .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the Cityaf stlt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other BO C During Construction A 4 ~ swtable means '- The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 2~6 nl , W r~ r~ r1 -. .. , All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrol~nk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Cultural Resources if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification wdhout an opportunity for the City to establish ds archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes 3of6 l ..9 r .. ... -. -. ~ , • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AID 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the pro/ect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with onginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroing A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation mondonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing acbvities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary a report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soiis The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 ~ ~6 ! t r~ i ... . .. . . . . .. ... .. . . . .. .: . . Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During q 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During q q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During q 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (W QMP), including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permd Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 5of6 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division The said consultant shall report their fmdings to the Planning Division within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Key to Checklist Abbreviations r~ `~ Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP -City Planner or designee A - Wdh Each New Development B -Prior To Construction A - On-sde Inspection B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 1 - Wdhhold Recordation of Fnal Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 6~6 STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00109 SUBJECT: FOUR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS APPLICANT: FRANCIS WANG, HPA LOCATION: 8226 ROCHESTER AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Development Review DRC2004-00109 is granted subtect to the approval Tenatrve _/_/_ Parcel Map SUBTPM16507 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-110, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire tf _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, stgn program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~"i ~' -q to Project No DRC2004-00709 Comolehon Date D. E. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/~ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer revew and approved pnor to the issuance of building permits Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including au conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or ~_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/~_ bulding colors Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a buiding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards ~-fS -~ ~ Project No DRC2004-00109 Comoletion Date 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District revew and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space m front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box tc avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential prolects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces requred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parkrng spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the bulding shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet • 3 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office bwldings and other non-residential development 4 For industrial prolects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and equipment shall be sufficient G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval 1n the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 OS 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial prolects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy -~-~- -/-~. -~_~. -~_~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~- - -~-~. -~-~. -~-~ L+f S-a g Project No DRC2004-00109 Completion Date H. 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 For multifamily residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant matenal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included rn _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Droision 10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/~_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is requred along Rochester Avenue 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 12 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 13 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval _/~ prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 14 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sig ns 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ~~_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division pnor to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of bulding permits Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Crtyto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit ~-~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00109 Completion Date J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submtt five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (DRC2004-00109) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00109) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwldmg permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permits issuance _/-/ -/-/- -/~. _/_/. _/~_ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2004-00109 Comolehon Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safery Official after tract/parcel map ~ _/~ recordation and prior to issuance of bwiding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~_/_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ___/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed ~_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, Ciry Grading _/_(_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by _/_/_ deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, where no map is involved 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint _/_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 H`iS~lp ~ Protect No DRC2004-00109 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map •P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Rochester Avenue X X (c) X X X (e) Boston Place X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Curbside drains 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlcand/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Completion Date -/-/ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~+,~-IOZ Protect No DRC2004-00109 Completion Date Existing City roads regwnng constructien shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Provide a minimum of 3-inch condwt for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the condwt shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to City Engineer review and approval prior to Issuance of bulding permits or final map approval, whichever comes first Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 7 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Mm Grow Space Spacing Size oty Rochester Avenue Foreground Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-up Background Brachychiton Bottle Tree 5 ft 25 tt o c 15-gal FIII-up populneus Boston Place Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-up Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only ~. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer ~ / -~-~- / / ~~- / / r 1 t -~-~- _/_/~ 8 ~-,S X03 Project No DRC2004-00109 Comole6on Date R. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred The developer shall be responsible far the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects S. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwiding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures U. Security Hardware One-rnch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices V. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime . Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- _/-/. / I -/-/- 1 / / / / / / / -/-/- ~tS-~~~ Protect No DRC2004-00109 Completion Date W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/~ wsibdity 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be ~_/_ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department X. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and ~_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I~ U y-,~-~o~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS May 10, 2004 Rochester Ave Industrial DRC 2004-00109, DRC2003-00974 & SUBTPM16507 (4) Industrial buildings THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants inmulti-family residential protects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wail facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwiding f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided t~ {~J7-~Ulo Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 3 Fire protection water plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specfications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprnkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califorma Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet The sprinkler system must be monitored by a listed Central Station Fire Alarm System FSC-5 Fire Alarm System Pnor to any installation removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwiding or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwlding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 ~i~ ~~~ 2 • 3 • 4 5 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) f Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required bwlding exterior openings Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not required to be motorized 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 3 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Frwt Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Any business that operates on rented or leased orooertv which is regwred to submd a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner r 1 L_J FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 Califorrna Bwldmg, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access• a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed w~thm the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provde a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subfect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property Ime, or c Provide service to adfacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or LL 5 II/` I ,~~ ~ 6W Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fue hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" 6 ~-,~-ttl PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- sitefire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the requued fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fue Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercal/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or bwit with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino 7 ~,~- ~-~, County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use m the event of an emergency at the subiect budding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 8