Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004/10/27 - Agenda Packet
OCTOBER 27, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES A ends 2 - 4 A Vacation of portions of emergency access rights over lots "B" and "G" of Tract 15727-4 5 - 12 B Develo ment Review DRC2004-00330 13 - 98 C - D Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 99 - 278 E Hillside Desi n Review DRC2004-00122 279 - 297 F Hillside Desi n Review DRC2004-00143 298 - 321 ~J • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO October 27, 2004 - 7:00 PM CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center ' Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias _ Vice Chavman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 22, 2004 September 22, 2004, Adjourned September 25, 2004 - Adjourned October 13, 2004 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone hme without d~scuss~on If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for discussion A VACATION OF PORTIONS OF EMERGENCY ACCESS RIGHTS OVER LOTS "B" AND "G" OF TRACT 15727-4 (V-198) - CENTEX HOMES - A request to vacate portions of emergency access rights over tots "B" and "G" of Tract 15727-4, located on Sunglow Court and Cedar Glen Place respectively, west of Archibald Avenue -APN 0210-481-03 thru 08 and 0210-481-33 thru 38 Related File Tract 16058 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA October 27, 2004 RANCHO G'UCAMONGA 2 B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES - A review of site plan and elevations for 29 single family detached homes on 11 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per .. acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard -APN 0225-071-74 and 77 Related files Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT16100, SUBTT14496, and SUBTT14496-1 This protect is based on an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and 1999, respectively, and an addendum prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2000 This project is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please waif to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00272 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park to Low-Medum Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, with a Master Plan Designation for the entire site, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue -APN 0209-092-04 Related file Development Distract Amendment DRC2004-00273 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00273 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning from Industrial Park (Subarea 6) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, establish a Master Plan Overlay District pursuant to RCMC 17 20 030 for the entire site, and adjust the Haven Overlay District Boundary approximately 60 feet easterly consistent with the land use designation change, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue -APN 0209-092-04 Related file General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration • • • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA October 27, 2004 RANCHO cUCAMONGA 3 VI. NEW BUSINESS E HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW- DRC2004-00122 - ORTIZ - A request to '~ develop one single family hillside residence totaling 6,006 square feet on 47 acre in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) in the Haven View Estates, located at 10973 Stallion Way - APN 1074-551-15 F HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00143-ANDREWS & CHAPMAN - A request to construct a two story, single-family residence on 69 acre in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side off Reales Street, west of Beryl Street - APN 1061-801-15 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the trine and place for the general public to address the commtsston Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, theyshall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 21, 2004, at least 72 hours pnorto the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, R ancho C ucamonga n/ Q s!/~~O~rio~J If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the heanng impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission October 27.2004 • ~' Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • N City of Rancho Cucamonga i l R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE• October 27, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan James, Senior CIVII Engineer BY. Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: UVtH LUIS "C" AIVU "Cd" Ut IHAI;I 75/[r-w Iy-iyal-~,crv~cn HOMES - A request to vacate portions of emergency access rights over lots "B" and "G" of Tract 15727-4, located on Sunglow Court and Cedar Glen Place respectively, west of Archibald Avenue - APNs 210-481-03 thru 08 and APN's 210-481-33 thru 38. Related File; Tract 16058 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Centex Homes has already Installed the private street improvements for Tract 16058 and is ready for acceptance by the City. As part of the conditions of approval of Tract 16058, Sunglow Court and Cedar Glen Place have been extended and realigned A lot line adjustment was processed wherein all the affected property owners had signed and notarized Recordation of the lot line adjustment Is pending and per the recommendation of the title company, Centex Homes has to first process the vacation of portions of emergency access rights over lots "B" and "G" of Tract 15727-4 Said access rights are located on Sunglow Court and Cedar Glen Place, west of Archibald Avenue and was dedicated to the City per Tract Map 15727-4 as cul-de-sacs. Once vacated, said easement area well be part of lots 3 thru 8 and lots 33 through 38 of Tract 15727-4 Parcels 1 and 2 shown on the exhibits are street dedications currently under plan check and will be finalized prior to City Council action. Utility companies, other agencies and various City divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and were asked for comments. There were no objections to the vacation from any of the groups notified. Item "A" ~ ~ L. J The vacation is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because said portions of emergency access are presently unusable and therefore will be part of lots 33 through 38 and lots 33 through 38 of Tract 15727-4. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the fmdmg_through minute action that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. Respecfully submitted, ~~ Dan Jam~~~~~~~`~ Senior Civil Engineer DJ WV•tch Attachments. Vicinity Map Legal Description (Exhibit "A") Plat (Exhibit "B") ~J ~--a -~r- R~1 N~'HO 6th ~ STREET Q Z 4th STREET 10 O/~1T,~)R/O CUGAMONGA N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: V-198' TITLE: V~C~/V~Tr ~/ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~- 3 • EXHIBIT "A" VACATION OF EMERGENCY ACCESS PART1 That portion of Sunglow Court (Lot "B") of Tract 15727-4 as shown by map on file in Book 272 of Maps at Pages 13 through 15 thereof, Records of San Bernardino County, California, lying Westerly of a step of land 60 00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows. Commencing at the Northerly terminus of the centerline of said Sunglow Court (Lot "B"), Thence S 00°07'15"W along said centerline, a distance of 94 39 feet to the Point of Beginrnng of said centerline to be described, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Easterly, hawng a radius of 600 00 feet, through an angle of 11°16'15", an arc length of 118 03 feet (the initial radial line bears N 89°52'45"W) to a point of reverse curvature, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Westerly, hawng a radius of 600.00 feet, through an angle of 03°35'30", an arc length of 37 61 feet (the initial radial line bears S.78°36'30"E) to a point on the Northerly Ime of said Tract 15727-4, said point being the termination of said centerline description. The sidelines of said strip of land 60 00 feet wide shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate in the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4. PART 2 That portion of Sunglow Court (Lot "B") of Tract 15727-4 as shown by map on file m Book 272 of Maps at Pages 13 through 15 thereof, Records of San Bernardino County, California, lying Easterly of a step of land 60 00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows Commencing at the Northerly terminus of the centerline of said Sunglow Court (Lot "B"), Thence S.00°07'15"W along said centerline, a distance of 94.39 feet to the Point of Beginning of said centerline to be described, ~~ ~ Page 2 • Thence Northerly on a curve concave Easterly, having a radws of 600 00 feet, through an angle of 11°16'15", an arc length of 118 03 feet (the initial radial line bears N 89°52'45"W) to a point of reverse curvature, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Westerly, having a radws of 600 00 feet, through an angle of 03°35'30", an arc length of 37 61 feet (the initial radial line bears S.78°36'30"E.) to a point on the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4, said point being the termination of said centerline description The sidelines of said step of land 60 00 feet wide shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate in the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4. PART 3 That portion of Cedar Glen Court (Lot "G") of Tract 15727-4 as shown by map on file in Book 272 of Maps at Pages 13 through 15 thereof, Records of San Bernardino County, Calrfornia, lying Westerly of a strip of land 60.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows: Commencing at the Northerly terminus of the centerline of said Cedar Glen Court (Lot "G"); Thence S.00°21'55"E along said centerline, a distance of 94 39 feet to the Point of Beginning of said centerline to be described, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Westerly, having a radius of 600 00 feet, through an angle of 09°50'02", an arc length of 102.98 feet (the initial radial line bears • N.89°38'05"E.) to a point of reverse curvature, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Easterly, having a radws of 600 00 feet, through an angle of 05°00'52", an arc length of 52 51 feet (the initial radial line bears S 79°48'03"W.) to a point on the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4, said point being the termination of said centerline description. The sidelines of said strip of land 60 00 feet wide shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate in the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4 PART 4 That portion of Cedar Glen Court (Lot "G") of Tract 15727-4 as shown by map on file in Book 272 of Maps at Pages 13 through 15 thereof, Records of San Bernardino County, California, lying Easterly of a strip of land 60.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows Commencing at the Northerly terminus of the centerline of said Cedar Glen Court (Lot "G"); Thence S.00°21'55"E along said centerline, a distance of 94.39 feet to the Point of Beginning of said centerline to be described; ~~~ Page 3 Thence Northerly on a curve concave Westerly, having a radius of 600 00 feet, . through an angle of 09°50'02", an arc length of 102 98 feet (the irntial radial line bears N 89°38'05"E) to a point of reverse curvature, Thence Northerly on a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 600.00 feet, through an angle of 05°00'52", an arc length of 52 51 feet (the initial radial line bears S 79°48'03"W.) to a point on the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4, said point being the termination of said centerline description The sidelines of said step of land 60 00 feet wide shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate in the Northerly line of said Tract 15727-4. .- CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP, iNC. Prepared under the supervision of. John W Canty R.C.E. 17550 Date • ~~ IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTYOF SAN BERNARDINO, CA VACATION OF EMERGENCYACCESS LOTS 3-8, 33-38, SUNGLOW CT. (LOT 'B) AND CEDAR CT (LOT "G"J OF TRACT MAP 157271 M.B. 272/ 13-15, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARD/NO COUNTY, CALIFORN/A OCTOBER 2004 SCALE 1'= 40' ,,, V ~ ~` M ~ ~n i ~ 1 N V m r~`~ ~ i~ u -- iJ\ •4/ ~-- ~ _ i- i . ._~ ~r~~ <~i .. '~-- .~- ~~_ -- -, ._. r~ V SHEET 1 OF2 SHEETS ~~ P ~ ~ _//A ~~ ~,~ r , ~ B~ 82;5-7 L`\ ~ ~~ ~-- /VB2'12 pp•~.y~~, N"LY LINE OF TRACT 15727-4 L07 ' C" R= 600 00' A=03'35'30" L=37 61 ' rJ. PART 4 TRACT 30' V 30' O Q o ~ "~ ~_ ~ orn ~ ^ h ~~ ~ .~. ~ ~ J~ ~ w ~ o~ o ~ o° ~ ~Q a 0 30' ~ 30' O A 2 I O (^ V 1 LEGEND ~ ® INDICATES VACATION OF EMERGENCYACCESS f7 78:36:30 E'(R ~~ PRCJ T2 7 95727-4 M B 272/13-15 a IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTYOF SAN BERNARDINO, CA VACAT/ON OF EMERGENCYACCESS LOTS 3-8, 33-38, SUNGLOW CT (LOT "B') AND CEDAR CT (LOT "G") OF TRACT MAP 15727-4 M.B. 272/ >3-15, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARD/NO COUNTY, CAL/PORN/A OCTOBER 2004 SCALE f' = 40' i pp ~9 30' 30' ~ ~~~~i ~, ~ aa~aa J~d~~1 ~~~l~d ~ ~ SHEET 2 OF2 SHEETS 1~~.~ M B 282/5--7 -N'LY LINE OF ~ `~` TR,4CT 15727=N84_48'S5"~RZ -_-- n V- R=soo oo' L07 " H" A=05'00'52" L=52 51 ' 25 I 3~ ~ 30' ~ ~ 3s 8'03"W~~ 3~ - p 7R~ ~ °~ PART 3 a~ °~ ~ ~:1 ~ N~ ~ PART 4 27 34 ` ° ~ W o ~ ~ h ~ 37 ¢p N - ~ ~ ~O ~ 0 Q 2 3 3 3 ~ 30' 30' 3 3 7RAC7 J ~ ~ - ~ O M B 272/13- 0 ~ 32 v 39 LEGEND ® INDICATES VACATION OF EMERGENCYACCESS ~--g T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE October 27, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES - A rewew of site plan and elevations for 29 single family detached homes on 11 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0225-071-74 and 77 Related files Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT16100, • SUBTT14496, and SUBTT14496-1 This protect is based on an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and 1999, respectively, and an addendum prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2000 This protect ~s within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 6 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant, Utility Corridor South - Etiwanda School District Middle School (under construction) and Vacant, Open Space and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant and water storage facility, Utility Corridor and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Public Facilities -Utility Corridor South - Public Facilities ;Park and Low and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Public Facilities -Utility Corndor and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site slopes to the southwest and has been rough graded in antiapation of the proposed protect ITEM "B" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES October 27, 2004 Page 2 • E BACKGROUND In June 1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development in the City's Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commercial, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion The University portion of the development has" since become Rancho Etiwanda The protect was re-designated from Open Space to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) by the City Council on August 1, 2001 ANALYSIS A General The density of the protect will be 2 6 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the basic development standards of the Development Code, the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The houses will include four different plans, and each plan will have four different architectural styles (Ranch, Country, Craftsman, and Monterey) Some of the houses include front porches or an offset third car garage and all houses have a strong 360-degree architectural style All houses that rear-on to Day Creek Boulevard will have decorative decks (such as brick and stoned shrouds on the support columns) B Desion Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, and Fong) on August 17, 2004 The applicantwas instructed to work with staff to enhance the architecture of the houses On August 31, 2004, the Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission, based upon the applicant's enhancements to the houses The Committee's recommended conditions are contained in the attached Resolution of Approval C Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on August 17, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the protect D Technical Review Committee The Techrncal Review Committee reviewed the protect on August 17, 2004 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment In June 1991, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors certifed an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the County Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The proposed protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 20009, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues assoaated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no . substantial changes in the protect that would regwre a mator revision to the previous EIR -~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES October 27, 2004 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2004-00330 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Cond~ttons Respectfully submitted, ~~ Brad Buller City Planner BB.DF/ge Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Draft Reso - Site Utilization Map - Detailed Site Plan - Bwlding Elevations and Floor Plans - Conceptual Grading Plans Conceptual Landscape Plans - Design Review Committee Action Agenda !ution of Approval for Development Revew DRC2004-00330 ~-3 ~~ o - < ~~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ =N N~ C a ~ Z ~ ~aE' OO~N U ~~ L FVD 3 -__ _ F z yd vii ~ ~3 f' ~ > N40 -r 33 F wul ¢ ~~`~ 3 ~ z bo ~ ~ o b$ ~ N ~ o ~GF i ~ ~~ ~ ~ /~~ , ~~~_ i I ,. r ___ ;~~ 9 ~ ~'C. -~ ,~ i ' ~~ ~~ .~, I \ __Jl_c I ~ I \~~~~~ u~ \\~ \\\~\ ', ~~ a ~~ I ~~ ~~~ ~ I ~ .\~\, ~~ ~~ `, ~\ \~ ~. ~~ ~ ~- _ I ~~ ~~ ~~~~ i "~- ~ ~~ ,y\ ~~ ~~ ~„ ; ~~, ~~ ' ~~ 'mil i i it i i ~(~~ r ~~ ~~ ~~ ~( ~< f F8 V ~ ~ ~ A 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~B 3 gee ~~a 3t?~~ p#1r p ~; ##s € a ~ @5~~ ~ ~'' ° # ~~~---~ ~ ~. ~\ I ~ __ ~ ~ \ _ ~ ~~ -- ~ / „`` ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 a\ `\ ~ / /~ \ V'Y ~ \~ ~~ ~a ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~, / ~ J I ~_~~ / ~ a~ a 3 ~ o e3 + ~ ~ ~~€-AS G re g e R ~~ ` ~ d s 33§~e~ ~ ~aEt§°s P~" gs9 I ip = ~ ~g~ ° d~ S; O F~lg esp~ e~gaS~~@~ 70 ~ O ypwa o y@E5~3'lyBBBBBB~` g~e[ABg~~e eB ~ W2 ~ y _ 4 ~ 9g~E Cp~' ~e~@@€~@ [ 9a ~ A jEj f N!sa ~a ~ggggp t@qeq a~a ~ ~55 ~j ~ E ~ g ~ a w e~~'~i~SF fi~o~4C~~9 E~ V t 3 3 ; ~ ~ gE.~ Epp@ ~ @~ €3~- W ~Y i~~ d ~_ ? ~a[f5°69gE -€~~K eg €€€~ ~€ }}sqSp£ ~a i4yy agS@ ~F~# agg ~ E@ 3€~R ~_ ~ e ~ i eid~g~s° ggC° 4~ @ e Cgs i b 83~°& ~~g ~~~cc Kgc ~~S ~$~ ~$°g ~~@,@A u ~3~99 w g ~&,~~~' fiB~1~€~ ~ = 4~,g S ii ~, ~°~~€ a, ~s@€ ~=€€~~ss€,y~~€€ Y ~€ ~ ~~~~€g ~ s~e€€ > ~~~@ ~pgE a Y ~ i &ea 3 ~s, s ' i ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ ~ ~3~€~? u C %~Ea c Ce3@~C7°~ A~8~~3€Is@ Y~9 ~~afl t d? ~ e ~~~, ~ ~ gg,~_\ ~ ,c.s A 3 a a ~~ a ~Z ~ ° ~° "~ ~ °` :_ K $w~ ~„ > ..fir- ~ _o~ ~` _ x a Q z ~ ~ ! .......................~,.... ~ ~~ fQ~, Q O S_. ~.eR:A;SFKCiA T ~~~~ ~go W m~ Q U ~~ Y a 0 R~ C s qe ~Y€Ai P ~g~ elegy ~~? 3~e ~ ~~~; gig> ~~! E~° ~S@@e € 1 C~ G~~ eetl`~n aE~€! e ~p ~~~ ~ ~~~e~~~ _ ~ ~Ee~ ~ ~~€~~~ °~ ~~E o ~@t.~~~~~ r~ek~ E z S xp a ~g3~~e~ v g,~, @g9 °9~g;t 3-fi s'Iju ~ !;t~ ®F ~~i~g i 1 1 r_1 i _ ~ 1 9 ~~ e ~~ ~ M e ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ M ~ ~ Q[ € ~ ~ ,~ ~~ s 9 s ~~ ~ Y ~y r ~F ~ Y /, i ~~~ ~ ~ ~~s~ ~/ \~ ~ ~ t ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~.~ - ~ ~, t • r i \ .~ I ~"` _ _ _ - ;,__ __ _ ~,~, l\\ \~4 ~ ~ \ \\`\\ L.{``\ 1\1\\ 1\~ 1\I ~ i\I\I ~ I\I ,I III II I~ ~r i ~ ~ i ~y~i I~"% I i iii "II ~ ~, ~lrii i r I 4T I i ~ ~,p I I I 1 I I ~~„ I ~ I I ~+'` ~ I I~ E~ I I AI II I" I fad Ig I ~~/ ~r c, I I I''t~ ~ L;;; r~~ 'iii ~'' i u iiln i i ~ iF%> ~~ ~~'~ilp.':, --~Tl~ z Z ~ ~ I "s ° ~ `~ ~ F$ I y SaT 'l `? t ~ O ~~ ~ ~ F, I Y] f O p U E ~~ .a a ~~ +~ ~ A t F ~~~~+! ~ ~a9 ~! ~~-k i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ B iq N ' ~ = =~ - -- --- -~--- ~,n F\~q` V y V~ O PLAN 2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS ~~ GRANITEHOMES B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Caltforuta • -, Key Notes OI b~bBkhuw YTYRm! O2 PYC TYROR O I1~CIa9Rm IW O !e! WIHO~aw1®Tls © WMUnIMv p W~,F.. O WWPo O ^~ la ~_~. II uo.a.evm 12 oene.. P,.,, m,m Il aYe..YSmv®. is W,..p,Rm Raw Is rll¢pSm R® 1© wme R.ll.e IT n._ .wwecw,.,., Itl rG,eY 19 Md e.®.Ia..M a.. IY~Yn4~+I Q td ueme~ 21 oprwm n..R 1$ FPTYI SIbryJ Mvvy WYl 2l 1 nag ~^R.un A-1 KTGY t'F30UP~ ,.. b= ..__ FICY IIM}.&NIl Fim9WmuW MM ]Y TW Pwe„mml ~e,.R xm, P,vl ammo wry a tYm `1 u Elevation B Country V" ~` GRANITE HOMES ~..,~~.,~ ~:.°:r:..,, PLAN 2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, California K`ey Notes ~ v..~.M~.,.,.s,n.M ~ er~.srrlmr p ~MI.~,.,e.,~ p 9...wM..emo~vY®„~. © w~,_.. O w~.b © Netl Wh O9 PWV 10 nu.n..~Mn, I I Ib'vtlnvp II o®.i. we M.n u 3~~® 14 w,wp,,~wuy IS 3 Dapflu®Pma 16 wnnv lhy Il e.mmwm raxm, la wura.u 19 MW imvlf 5e.lla 19~P~M^ell 20 Y.aaan no.mx.. 21 „o.awme o:t O sv'rr 9MS,ren~wa 2J 3 py m.e.vme A-2 KTGY GROUPI ~,. PN8olmbl 1v<4Lw ib191vW Ay 1]3M 8levattoo D - Monterey Ool Deek ~r I I I ~J;d~ I e® ~o B4 I ~ I I ~ I I I -~_ _____ I M Bdrm I __ -, I I I ao..~o I I I ar...J l I I et ea Bdrm } ~ wrc f ~~ Boaua Rm M2 - `~ -n~a ,~ 7~1 w~ U ~ ~ ~JJ ^I (`-' Bdrm 3 1 Bdrm 4 1 ~~% ' "'°' JI :ern ~+ 1 Second Floor Area 2175 s f Fmt Flcor Mx 1770 B f CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 - 3945 S F GRANITEHOMES ~,bv~ ~:„ B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, California A-3 KTGY GROI.P ~.. um •r..s~+.d.l w.mw mot 40.EW l0!)1) YUI i GRANITEH06MES -- - -~ l ~~ __ ~~ o$ ~~ ~,~-, _ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ , aarn, s ~~ i w~ Oottonal Bdrm 5 OPTIONS CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 - 3945 S F A~ ~v c~amlT BLAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST 6_'-:'' ~_•, Rancho Cucamonga, Cali f orn~e em. mmn] vx+aew~w.owma PoI19~IW Me4Np1 PIS194vY,1 M,1] YM ~(~ ROOF PLAN ^A' REAR ELEVATION PLAN 2 - A RANCH ELEVATION S .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KSTON E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Callf orn la i • LEFT ELEVATION A-5 ~~ KTGY,.. ~fR,Ol1P ,.~ KTUY ILYq Wl O nu 6uM1nml Moo M 3MM PWI9,hNnW bKMM plm14u1aJpl IWy 11 TYN i RIGHT ELEVATION (~ GRANITE HOMES ~~ ROOF PLAN "B" REAR ELEVATION PLAN 2- B - COUNTRY E L B V A T I O N S B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Cal If ornla i LEFT ELEVATION A-6 KTGY GFfOIP~^=Y 5_ °' ~- •.m~umam re.w,,,w wa n,aa eu ~i ~ e vao, n.nammi wyu ma RIGHT ELEVATION -1 ,(V~_ v ' REAR ELEVA770N I~ ~~ PLAN 2 - C - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION S .GRANhTEH06MES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California LEFT ELEVATION A-7 KTGY Cd20lP~ ,.. I.IOY EU)Jfi MflWY M~JM ML MWdeY l.e• Zp ~I)I~ RIGHT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN'C RIGKT ELEVATION V GRANITEHOMES REAR ELEVATION PLAN 2 - D MONTEREY ELEVATION S B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Callf ornie LEFT ELEVATION A-8 KT6Y GFIOUPI~ rm~ ,..I,mw ROOF PLAN 'D" I e,;d M Ba i ~ li .~~ B rm w~ I as m _ a.~ f~ ~ _ X _ Semnd Floor Ama 2175 a f our Ihct ---, I I I M Bdpm II we.a I I I ~.. II ~! Bd am 4 GRANITEHOMES uai°r"~ni. s°ie°e • `~ .J I ~~ f Bonus R d2 ~ vaa°'. I ~ I I ,., I -- i D Family L' ~ w sa _____ ..u r, i in I ' wap '' I ° _______i 4 Cur O~ge O _______ _______ w p o~ ~ ~ I I n S[udy/ Liwina ~ ) Oor. Br. 5 ~- ~ u.n w~ w~ ___________ ~ f ®Porch ~, 3z~ o- ~ i -.. iY m 1770 a fV' ~~ CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 ALT - 3945 S F WRAP AROUND PORCH PLAN B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, California A-9 KTGYT~~OLIPi ,~~ b_.C.:m° ~..~_ rrarmi,n rn ae.~m M.an. aoa wn edmi >r4mu RJSWW MI)xM ;~ ` -- o I t 1 __ w~ I I Entrv I II II I edrm s i ~~ Optional Bdrm 5 OPTIONS CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 ALT - 3945 S F WRAP AROUND PORCH PLAN .GRANI~THHoMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California A-10 KTGY GROLIP~ ~. ~IOT]9Y0 P eSbeul MW NI.IIOI m algml 1®4~ PLa Sl~W 1vIY 1l w1 PLAN 2 • A - RANCH ELEVATION S A T W RAP A R O U N D P O R C H .GRANI~TEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Cai~forn~a • - LEFT ELEVATION A-11 KTGY Q20W -~ SR1Y ]MJdO F 0itip11bJ gyry ~ro~_1 M0.3m~ AIY II llM C~ PLAN 2 - B COUNTRY ELEVATION S A T WRAP AROUND P O R C H .GRnx1TEHo6MES B LACKSTON E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Cal If ornla LEFT ELEVATION A-12 KTGY Q20lPl. e~~~~..::..-- FTIIY 3WJM Fhv]LLmlml Neeh l4 Hd PYI1bMYl Is1A01 Fw see~wm nuy i~ zow PLAN 2 - C CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION S A T WRAP AROUND P O R C H GRnN-meHoMes B L A C K S T O N E RI DGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, California LEFT ELEVATION A-13 KTGV GROIPy.., ci[yvsm.yw rv..emmmn w.uwxov wn s~s.mi y.k4aw ~e.e~w yoy n na PLAN 3CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS .GRANI~TEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California ~y Notes p e.wwlwe~snl.pp~ p FLOmepil6 psf O] LIgH Waanvm MW O fist Trd ASmmFaeTmm OS Cm®~SWy © WmEQOImYn O Watl Pov O W~Ra~ O9 Faml 10 Ilsmprt VUS. II omw.. vw Il Cml.eFm lm, I] cunefim vm 11 wwpp.„wlly IS i 1Ypfilcvp®. ® wna4ay 1) nmaw~mrw.m IB wp„u~nel 19 wlsulmJa.r.,. m. (Ipsa4ws11 ® finelmsem~ 21 lymlweJ OSi 22 sm.Jl sla:ywm.,<y w.n 2) rwyLm.pme A-14 KT6T Ci2IX1P1 ~.. ~~ ~~_ [IOYIDm+m fve.emrl M.m14~91 hll flllelul 1me 6Y01 PuJ B.Y.iwl )ply l)]f4 B lerarion B Country 4WD \~ PLAN 3 CONCEPTUAL, ELEVATIONS .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Cal r CornSa i ! Key Notes ~i ~..w.n~rowrnmr ~ ti~,4~~ Q Mr~~r~ ~ ..1n,.cr...._r.r O r~^-M~. © w~,~w_,. O w~,ti © w~r.ww Q ~~ to Uwuwln 4up. 11 n®.i..vm 13 o.~.reb~ u Ne.vewm.v® IS rmyerm~ Ifi wml wuq IJ a.mi.awvarnm..i IB w~ram 19 MW wa~a..F re. tmWp~1 Me1M SV~lIa RI gviwn w~.Mm~t O eorm3NandN+r w.v O YltrywmvY® A-15 KTGY Q20U'~ ..~ FT(iYYY)#M iW BWnYW MWIDTm PJI&ihoYUl urcE llM rkM ~enw i.h l> mw elevation D Monterey oat per ------ =~ I I ru.. I I M Bdrta I e « I WdV I I L__-__~ _ V" ~ ~ - __ ' p V \ I ,. ~ _- ~~____ oft w~ Sewod Floor Area 2227 s t a - I rjti I I W~~ ~ ~ I I I I I w a I I m I I I I ~_-----~ I I I ___ .~ ~ ~ I W1C o Bdrm" 2 war I r W~ -r- Bdrm" ; ~.~ ~°~ w I I n etr t/ I I Exercise Room p.« w CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 3 - 4083 S F - 4288 S F .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KSTON E RIDGE EAST `~ °°° °°°° Rancho Cucamonga, C a l i f o r n i a A-16 Krtsr crta.Pr::° cmv m~m> ...~ u.ararau r1a-.... rr. IDY PWIr~W Idr ll.xp c~ i i i i i __-J -_-'~ ~~, ~~} Hdrm 4 I ~I buest Suite w '~ ~ ..a ~ ... n r~\ 1 Car Garaee Optional Bdrm 4 8c Bath 4 GRANITEHOMES Tt> o w~ Optional Wtne Storage [- Optional Guest SutteGuest Sutte zos er CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 3 - 4083 S F B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Calt forma A-17 KT6Y GROUP, ~.. K1GY 3WfJ0 M9,~W MaJ]Q Lp wo sae.m~ r.4mw RN aA~iY1 M~K mw Opttonal Guest Surte 2 /Bath 5 -- - W ROOF PLAN "A` REAR ELEVATION .uu yr i r • PLAN 3 - A - RANCH ELEVATION S .GRA~NI~EHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Cal~forn~a RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A-IS KT6Y GROIP ,K L_ __- cmr mmm Feaewam u.aximo~ RJI9om'ml 1~4L4 vwe„emmi iy n rm W ROOF PLAN 'B' REAR BLEVATION PLAN 3 - B - COUNTRY ELEVATION S .GRA~NImEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California LEFT ELEVATION A-l9 KTG V GROUPi ~.~ [1f1YEU4W) i-N 94mW 4~dWDD1 va _.... n..~ ma MI9@mnl lYy 1] lIW RIGHT ELEVATION - ~~ ROOF PLAN 'C REAR ELEVATION PLAN 3 - C - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION S .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KS TO N E RI DGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A-20 KT6Y GROUP ~. [)OY YOI W) P6x/1aW u~N )q#a roe9eWlm1 l~4mw PWB~M1i 1Wy 1) MIN ~_ ROOF PLAN "D' -- RICHT ELHVATION ~~~ -- - - - -- -~ REAR ELEVAi'ON PLAN 3 - D - MONTEREY ELEVATION S .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga. Cal~forn~a LEFT ELEVAVON A-21 ®~TGri "pQ200P= r_ S'RiYXY)tlN PIN SLpWeY MWi]p ypl Putl9MW bP MM IYY U Lq1 rW W ~u RIGHT ELEV A710N AT GUEST SUITE GRANITEHOMES ,.,;, ~o,~;® PLAN 3- A - RANCH E L B V A T I O N S AT GUEST SUITE. B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornla A-22 KTGV GRIX1P ~.. _- ~~~ ._ __. ~~ ~~~ waa..~ ,«. mo, .vim ,W, u,uw ELHV ATION A -RANCH (\~..7"~ W RIGHT ELEV ATION AT OUEST SUITE PLAN 3 • B - COUNTRY ELEVATION S A T GUEST SUIT E .GRANi~T'EHoMES B L AC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California A-23 KTOY GROUP ..: rmrmi.em rma~..w w,awm,. ~~ ti. ~~w iWr a mw ELEV AiION B -COUNTRY C~ r'Wle'' W • RICHT ELEV ATION AT GUEST SUITE .~,.. ~,..~ . t GRANITEI-IOMES um~ Ntiom PLAN 3 - C - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION S A T GUEST SUIT E B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Caltforn~a i A-2A KT6Y GROIR~... b. ..~_ Klt1Y}W]JN Peu9wmgw Medl4lttl Pwie.mww Pnme mo, AW fWwew ].y i] mo, w~~° ELEVATION C EUN CA LOW W PLAN 3• D - MONTEREY E L H V A T I O N S A T QUEST SUI T E .GRANI~TEHOMES """ ""' ` `" "' ` B LAC KS TO N E RI DGE EAST ~ Rancho Cucamonga, C a l i f o r n i a A-25 NTGY (iiOllPi~~ emr mmao~ rv. e.miw w.ewmo, gQ~~ ~LAa W/119p ,..,~~" ELEVATION C BUNGALOW RICHT ELEV A710N AT CUEST SUI7E i i V- GRANITEI-IOMES PLAN 4CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Callf ornia __ i ~y Notes O Iw A.Ab Gas YTy MY O TYGmuIY AvR o ~w~~~ © 6~FLJd Rw®midn TAm O$ Ce~mIYYx,6bY © WNIIWrm O W~Is © Wetllv4 O iNh°V 10 p®.4.am. 11 om.m..vm 12 omr..imwe. 13 _.. .em.v® 1~ wA.,uemuuy IS i y9m.,® wmAypy 1) a+w Wmecd~ 18 wml Catrl I9 ~mm~.m (ewM q+eel Q fwWmAVer 21 opbYwoam ~$ Ytl T~9Aih9utl RnY. WW A-26 KTGY f32IXJP1. cTmm~m n.e~r Almlq E01 M9~iwl >"420A NW B~OI luy IS Yw 81eve1lon A 0.eoeh B IeYe4I0a B - C.OOn1tr Key Notes: ~i 1..~.®,~a..,.w O M1llm/.RRef O1 IyYle4fe•.m M1M O WIW 9,sv va Yrrlffi OS D~B~ © VmLOWb OJ Wm1FUu O Wmi~YOu O los~V IQ om.u.. s.a. 11 o®.r..va 11 omwn Finan 13 oureos'..v® IR W~aW eao Raga Q rys.m c® w.oe p.By 1© o.neee wmB Car IR Wme_ . 19 uwS~YOgIb Im.tleB C~`IbYj ® Meiwn®4~ 31 opbw wump¢B © 6V iYIBWpq ITrti W,Y O i Cy 11mP® ^~ PLAN 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS .GRANITEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST ~~~ ~~~ ~.., ~ ~~~~ B°,., Rancho Cucamonga, Cal 3 f o r n 3 a s • - - A-27 KT6V~ ~~_` __OUP~ :: [1pY'SSIJtlI Fv9amW Mb b,Sp RY9ba1 in.4m~ IYy a mw B lavelioa C Bu o`alow H levatloa D - Sao Juao Gu J Second Floor Area 2446 s f CiRANITEI-IOMES ~,~rmre. _~ CONCEPTUAL FLOOA PLAN 4 - 4654 S.F B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, California A-28 KT6mm Y 1: e. ~~ ~~ ~xi~ r Mae.iw >m.tmw ~~ ,~~x~. ._ ___ ~ /\ ~ 1 N1C ; ->~ ~ MGdia w~i _ wW _ ~ `M1C M C G JC ` ~ _` ~ --- --- i a:b i B4 ~ ~ BQre'~ 0 w 0 ~~ a.r ~~ .err Optional Bdrm 6 Opttonal Medie Room Opt Wetbar ~r'~ ~ ~ - ^1 ~ ue,..r 1 I ~ L i~ i w ~'(~ _ _ - -_' _ ~ r~ Den w:b _ ~ ~~ i `M1C Bonus A)2 Retr t - _ rare wav _ ________ rm .aur Opt Bonus #2 & Retreat GRANITE HOMES OPTIONS Optional Den CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 4 - 4654 S F B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Calf orn~a A-29 KT6Y GROUP ,. ~_ ..__ [Il1Y ID]JJ0 PHBUmmW Nvi4)4IDL rm we.~ ~,aaw PW SeY~ml IWy 1) #W REAR ELEVATION PLAN 4 A - RANCH ELEVATION S GRnN[~ EHOMES B L A C K S T O N E RIDGE E A S T Rancho Cucamonga, Calif orn~a LEFT ELEVATION A-30 KTt;r caxalP .. erarmm m~ v.. ma.~u uuwmw RIILUYUI bs4D1M PW9~W IWF IIffi~ ROOF PLAN "A" RIGHT RLEVATION d ROOF PLAN "B" REAR ELEVATION PLAN 4 • B COUNTRY ELEVATION S .GRA~NI~TEHOMES B LAC KSTO N E RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California LEFT ELEVATION A-31 KTO~ _ _Y (~OUp~ amrmmam rn. e.em~ waMm~ na rrw rt~ow - __ _ _.._ ~+nxma _- . _ - RIGHT RLEV ATION • • ROOF PLAN "C" W --~ w • A REAR ELEVATION P L A N { C - C R A F T S M A N E L E V A T I O N S .GRA~NITEHOMES B LACKSTO N E RIDGE EAST Reecho Cucamonga, California - ~ ! -1 LEFT ELEVATION A-32 RTOr c~xar, emrmmam r _. , uw wma P4 mWw lu.4m ewes i.yu 3b RIC HT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN "D' l~ ,~-° ~ ~ ~ ~_ r~ 1~`' NFi~I-~,.•i REAR RLRV ATION i PLAN 4 - D - MONTEREY ELEVATION S .GRA~NITEHoMES B LAC KS TO N E RI DGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, California • LEFT ELEVATION A-33 KTGY GROIPI ~. ...,.,.. . cmr mm.tw e W~_ rsv.as.ew u.an moa MAWYI Ye4Ap FW SiW lal/II IDIX R1GHT ELEVATION i~ i ~ ~ 3g~ w F ~ I~ r~Je~~~~!'1~l~ia~$~]~aa~d k ~~~~~12~~~f1~~.P18~~~~.~ 0000000000000000000®OOOO d W+t ~~~ m =i~ Ldp ~~ ~ZI F z 0 m w 6 F m U Z O V d W = a W o A V H am A W' z~ O F~ y o ~ ~ U~ ~a a oa OSS W ~: F~+R zee ~.~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 'EE a d 1 1) a ;~! #~~ rgJ~1~~a1 ~1!lij~i~~~e~~a oEi~~~ Gila#1~$$$i~~~~~d$1~$d~~°~ _ 000000000000000000 O ®000 ~ !! (ZI a F ti d N a O = W o O o < ~ ~ w m > .mi m A U o ~ , ~ ~ H ~ ~i m 6 m o ~ ~ e Z ~ v z4 u Q o U F" y o a x x~ U m da .a ~~~ w1: ~I~ gzp c~`•1 /~!'~K ------- ~J 9 ~ ~ MASTER ~ ~ A a®ROOM ~I J ~~ I g ; o.s.. ~n F, ______________ I J r -- I I I I ; I 9 OpwmWw i 1 i I I ~ I ~ ~_____ BPDAOOMI m M aArx A ~1 n~l i ~EPDROOM3 i i O O i T~ImOON A ~ I L _J .mad P~OOr Area. 1546 s L Fuag Flmr Area. ~~/(g 6r CONCRPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 5 - J255 SP ~~GRAMTEHOMES BLACKSTONE RIDGE EAST ^S. e's ;.~;.:5 :. :.;~, Rancho Cucamonga, Calrf ornra A-36 N Lera raoeeL co. mmaeo,ma Mon 3galw Pm 9,bmMJ 3®ua and pea,bmltlW Augur, 31, ]IW ~-a~ v L 1 - BPDRODM B Optwod~8 mom6 @ Bonus Room L~GRntvrrE HOMES :..aea.,~,.... oPnoNAL 9 B®aooMs OotroNl Hedmom @ Teen Room OPTIONS CONCHPTUAL PLOOR PLAN 3 - 3253 TO 3613 aP BLACKSTONE RIDGE EAST Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla BEDROOMa BEDROOM OARAOB Oonoml Bedmom 7 @Smge ARa -206 aC t _ A-37 LEN NOBEL CO. RNa.4m1 MW Sq aW Pmsm~rcn Im,a2oM r ~mAw.nLmol ~- -- ~-- noelBwus Room m 6ange - 216 st V" ~! V 4 »m.» I I ~ o-.. ~ s f I I I A __ __a____ ____-0 __ .. ..'___ 1 b ROOP PLAN 'B' PLAN 5-B - COUNTRY - CONCEPTUAL BLBV ATIONS .GRANITEHOMES BLACKSTONE RIDGE EAST :..,....»,... «.......,, Raocho CocamoB ga, CallforBla A-38 IN L~~Nr~EE ~Cr0. wn9dmw ~udRma Pa0]~ Jo0.zd RsmbmNM A.pq )~ ana RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION rue v-v LEFT ELEVATION p~ \' x PLAN 5-C -BUNGALOW - CONCEPTUAL BLBVATIONS pig L~GRnxfTa HOMFS L~N.~^~B-E YCry^_ BLACKSTONE RIDGE EAST ~N~ ' ~::": ~:::~~ Rancho Cucamon ga, CallforBla Pen~mYUm]q and Pm9~rtW ~.4anl a.~+ma /~'wnJLaM ROOF PLAN'C' rug.-.. RIGHT ELEVATION cam. w-ev REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION .waw~ia s +~ - s PLAN 5-D - SAN /UAN CONCBPTU AL PLB NATIONS L-1GxnN[TEHoMFS BLACKSTONE RIDGE EAST ^3..::...:..~... Raacho CucamoDga, Cal~foro~a RIGHT ELEVATION A-40 N LEN NOBEL CO. Pca sww~w u.w ao, mo. wv wemtr.i ~ 4 mw aeanni~ Aupm )Lma I ROOF PLAN 'D' REAR ELH NATION LHFT HLHVATION =~i 43 4 e4 ~ ° z p . ~~ 4~ 4e ~ lie ~ tlp 5~ ~ €t ;€~[ i° ~ r ~ ~'~ ~ V ~ t 9 G'6 g@q po Fffs gg ~t ~° €~ ~e Ri€~ gg p e ~ ga q a ~ a ~ a ~~p@ std ':e ~! ~~@ ~ ~' ~~ e@ y "+~@ tl~ 'F~ ~ '~ A ~ j s ° ~ 8 ~ ~ ~pg$g$~yy ~; 4)g ~) tg~e) t ~p y)y~ ~~ ~ °~~ ~~ )~8 # ~x g~ at ~,s ~~ ~ ~ w AA~B g~~ g)y3t ~€ ~9 q ~g 4~ tl ~ ~~~ ~~ g4 tl i ~1 ?dd 4 g ~yg~~ ~1~g~R ~ cN.~ g@ ~s ~ ?tle ~~ S~ 4 S xe a~~ 6~a §a Ay~i @@3 ~~ i 4€~~@~~@5~g3a3Aa ° e 3 ~ 3 ~i ° t~d~ ~~~~ t~) R~ ~d; $ ~` t~ )~ £ ; a4 a9A"'~) e~€4 ' ~ ~ g ~ e a i @pQ38~,y~ €~@~ ygy@@~ 6a ae~ tl 9° )~ ~~ a a~~ )(~ ~ ,ryY~ g~ )i~ ~~ p~ ~ p ) ^tlt tg°9 Ydd t ~~ ~ $]~fd €. ~$~7 i8 ~q~@ a~t ~6P 3 t~F ~~ 4 A A ~A 3 'd 9 ~ ii ~.gg a C€t@ 3tl to tl~~ ~ !E` P e Ps t €4@ tl @ ° i =Ae@ 4 g gQ R~p iK 'a @ '~ ~d9~ s @ ~? g€@ ~. 5s ~p ntl3 e ~ ~ ~ ~y @@~ E ~~d ~~ ~ ~ ~e~k 3~e gAae~ ~ s'~ "a)~ a)~~ ~ `~~ @@~ )t ii@ ~ ~a tl~ ~" Y~ ~( 8g s i ~ ~ ~ @3p~ 4" ~~8 a ~~~~~ ~~t~ ~~e ~~~ ~9!) ~ ~~~ ~~) ~~~ )~ t~~ ~~) °~s~ ~ ~0~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~'!~ ~~tl td's€t~ ~~ae@ ~ ~ ~@~ a ~~,~ t ~~~~g~ ~ ~ -- ; eQ ea _... e) ~t i@a~ ~ ~ ! ' 1 I:i~i dli 7 ,a@. ~ .f)E t) ~ .fl ~i ~ ! dg a s Ere6~ a t~ i 7 i''~~ 1 ttt 4 A °~ ) f1. ~ eoas tt ~e~i)@t~~lafia@~;11 ~gt~tt dt ~) ~~ e~ 'ss 9 , C7 0 ~-6~M~ s ~ { t o;~a~gie~l~6~~t~t~~6ypp~ ~I ~OV c ~F@~61 al ~ ~; ' ..... ~ ~~ ylc o::?V a:9 Ye@'f~~Y W ~~ ~n ! 1!! r ~Up ~Fig~ :a T ~ 7 ') i. ' t~9 ~~~~ W~~ ej t@ t ~ q 5 ma A 1 ~$ . ~ ~ v~~e ~ ~ { ~ pev @P ° Y 'a ~ r 44e 4 e 4 ~ ~ o ~ygy p $gi`§§p fi))y9))t) ~) ~ t=^ p2eaidfia YF'~~etl e BiKK pp99 ~~jj gg 3yy ~d6'a6§~t ~g~fiF~gd-yye~ ~ ~ = '~ d) ~) t Y d ~ H 4 y ' 4 > 9 ~9~ ~~Egg ~ ~ ~ a a a~1~~e d@))~d) <;_T l 5 6 - ~' It.f t ~ ~ ~, d 4€& ° if1~t ,~ 1`,1~t N N w ~-S_ \I W N G nf 3F i .~. _ Z a ~ 1 ` ' ~ U _ C4 TJ > 1 1 ~ ~ I C~ ~pp i 3Y 1 ~ Z i 3 K4 p ~ ~ V d o ~ o g 9~ ~ U V d WN K 9 € O 1 ~ a s e ~3 3 . ° € e~ II ~ i 5 A ! a '~59F i Iry' / € i py GGG F 4 ~ ~a~E ~'-- -- rIDU6 ]]s ]xn4lplrrv / m vito I ~ 1~~I} I I~'k.~T /• ~~_ a, ~ ' ~ IIII I -_ - @ I ~I II F , `~`--`--- - i I II 4 I ,».~,~... a I IIII I ~ IIII IIII f zE I .~.~~, ~.. °-~ - I l p ~ i ~ ..~ III ~~` ~ 4 I I I ii f t i ~~ + p ~, Fea ~ i s~; l it/i ° u3 i I k A I II _ ~~; 9 fs !. ®~e 'I ~ ~ IIII I ~ ~~ ~ k I I I ~1 II q H I A \ t c I i IIII , ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ,?~l ~' _ ~ IIII-v 4G _ _ •~ t ~ I ~ I ~ II F~ N aa'a p~ ®~ t I I € j I II '? n...~ ~ .° I f.= F 1~' ~ ~ ' ~, e~ ~" { IIII ~ ' ( I ` m I &k I III I~' I :i ~g I IIII K• I Fin ~ III( L~ I I \ /~ ~ IIII ,.. .,<<-- - --- m 5~ I II ~~ p ~ i~ I A I C 21]]4L ]lG ]NOY~IV/IW/'^~] ~L/ ~~ 3~ ~ I 055551 n ; 7 ~ 95 § F~g£ 1~ q @ 9 $~ S _ ¢~ ~ £ 3 t~~ ;1 { "~ >~ d g,- ~ --- ~ @! @ 9 /' \ _ /. \ ' h4 ~~ ~~ ~~(\ 11 app ~ ,~ E ~~ ,,, ~~, ~: III ICI I S` F I I I ~~V I II1~„ ~_ t I I < d„r, 111 I '4 ~I ~~- ~- I I ~~ . f ~ I I ~ •,° + I IF III 1 1 III1' III N III FI 'III II II1F II ~ JJ I (~- ~ r ~S 14 1e - -N1- U • ~. ~ 6 g O a ? ~ UN ~ ~£ 3 09 ' ~ a ~~ ° ~ 8 h V O - u a 3 < be {. ~£ ~Li~! $g~ ~g~1 ~+_~! ik 4 ,~ g0 9 ,U ~ , t - --i _ -- i - - i '_ L~G°QC~]DD ~~ °, GEC GaG°~C~C~I~~C~~~'MG~LQL~ pL~,G°QC~I~ ~oc~ ' TRACT NO. 16100 SLOPES, TYPICAL FRONT YARDS STREET TREES AND FUEL MODIFICATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Q ~r ~ p °, G°~~ LM~I~La~La/~9 ~MD~C 700 OO ~~ ~/ ~ Ll V ~9 ~~i=~~ ~ ~~~~LY PflQ,~Ci ~^~ VICiNfTY MAP SHEET INDEX 1 TITLE SHEET - 2-6 IRRIGATION PLAN-SLOPES 6-9 PLANTING PLAN-SHRUBS 10 STREET TREES AND FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN 11 IRRIGATION PLANS-TYPICAL FRONT YARDS 12 PLANTING PLANS-TYPICAL FRONT YARDS 13 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS a• i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIJGA - - TN1.E SI~h'1' Ta ~ ~~ acr 1s1ao SLOPES „ ~ :'TiJ4 ep TYPICAL FRONT YARDS AND FITFL MODQ~lCAT10N /®.®.~/ RmEX MAP SEP 17 7~ U J ~,®• ®~~ ~ .; ~~ ® ~ _~ --._~ ® -- i ,~ _; .s~.....~.s... ~. 9 ~ ~ 2 i 1 i ~ , i ®® J 8 - °% ~r.., ~~ ~ - ~° ~~ A~ 9tREET REFER TO SHEET 3 FOR IRRIGATTON SPECIFICATIONS REPRR TO SHEET 13 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAn c snn ~~ 4- uW~~ aersroxs -~ o~ SEP 17 2004 i ~~:.~:.~~.M ~-=~.~ . ° ° ~.~._._.,.MS_~ -~.~~~ ..aa,s.~ m~.~. ~~ iFACi 16100 TYp~C SLOPES AND FUEAL MODIF7CA~'f7ON SEPl79Me REFER 7'O SHEET 2 POR IXRIGATfON I FPEND __~_ _ REFER TO SHEET ll FOR CONSTRUC17ON DEfAES tee, s ~, =.~-e-~ =~==a: .~.sL:_~ -ice i ~n'ay Ub Cltt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rre~ n ~~ ~ VUUCATION PLAN STAPES e "~ia'~C2 ~ rnecr isiao e.TYPm ~C~I. FRONT YARDS , CF0749M! _ KKYER TO 511EEI' 3 FOR IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS - a REFER TO SIIEEI' 13 FOR CONSTRUCRON DETAES r a 4 N ~.~ ~J L..J a NNN '~~ ~~~ ~~~'~ C ~~ iii ~ g~'~ ~ , 4~ I a ~~ SEP1?20de 3 Pp~~4y ~g ° @~ y~6Pi1 ~ ~ .4 ~`~~i4'~~ ~Y "E~~ 4~°~~~~BflF rP t~ ~t! E,€P6 ~ ~~ ~ ~~a~g'g~~~I~ ~~ ! Q pp ~tC a4" e i4°e 99s 4 ~9 ~~ ~ ~ l~~ti~~E°~~' Pi ~ ~~~ \, 1 ~ / ~ ~ 9 ~p ~ P [qP a ~ ~~~ ~' ~ % tl~tl iii! i ! t 444444$ + 7~ 7 ~ 6 A ~ [ P ° e ~ ~ 6x Q P ~ @ ~~ E ~ g e @F~ F C~ 9 9 ~ 9°~ p€ 9~ ~! 9 e 3 49 Q e 5 @yp A ~ ~ B ° p p !Y ~ }'{6 ~ p ; ~ E ~~ e~ i E{ tl '' 3 e~i ~ ~E y~p i} Q$~ ~d ~ SPP §§ f ~ P ~~ § 3~p~ ~f ~~ p3~ @P EP FP! ~ @gg i¢~~ j i1 @3~ ~9 ~ + ~i 43 6 P14~~ Q ~~~~ g~ do ~~ z o° ~~ e ~~ F ~~ j ~~ E h ~~ R _~ I~~ ^`-Eti-'~~---M a- CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA .~_ SHRUG PLAHPWG PLAN-STAPES -..~.. °a'8£~re raecr is~oo TYPICAL ~ON~'~AR~DS sunmmr SFP 1771V0 s • ~ J REPER TO SHEEP 7 FOR PLANTING SPEC~1GT10NS a REFER TO SHEEP 13 FOR CONSTRUCI70N DECAIIS - -- --- REFER TO SF~.Ef 6 POR PLANT LEGEND REFER TO SHEEP 7 FDR PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS REPER TO SHEET' i3 POR CONSTRUCTION DETARS y i CIN OF RANCHO ,~,Y°~." SHRUB PLANTINGP ~~O iRACi 1611 ~cY ~ypICAL FRON7 ~ _.. AND FUEL MODE -~~2'i a[vrsrole SEP 177aoe a W N ~_~ C_~ 3tl ~„ ' ``8/y33tli9 /~ j 1t: ~, .~. ~ ~` , ~ \ ` a - \ \ ~ 3 w ~ P o N ~~ \ ~ ®® ~ a~ ~., gg r ~a Y a ~ t i a ® `- ®® . - // ,0, y33tl15, J ~i /_ 4~ 1@ P •~~ m ~ ', n ~~ a ~`\ ~ U ~1~~ _~ ~ i ~- z a ~ ~6 Ml ~a ~ I ° 1 ~ ~~g~ P ~- ~ ~ ~ N~ O Z ~^ o ~ ~ •a^~ i U MV v@ f5 8 F E ~ ~ •'m• €! a K ®®~ ~~ s ~ ., \ ~ Rf6fRl6l6Rl6Fk66G9k6@~6R i i iiiii}}}iii iii ii 1@fi@fiB1Bfifi @If911i 11@0@~$ / ~11IIIOIIIptltltlplcil lp111tl0~e ~3~~ Ifltlll(I(llllfl'~I (I~(f!¢~it@„ ///,.,,//P,PPPPPPPPP,PtP@`@1@ 1 g@@@@@@!@@@!@@@@@@@@@@!@@pl pal~# i t......nse e ~~@PV@PO@vl# P9@PI Pv@P/@ ~PIPPIPPPP• vPPYP PPP/ ~~~~~I~l~ I~iII ~~~~~~~~~ a 11333#333 3#!1#YL!#Illt y i ~ ~@#!33#!#3! 3!S!!33#!33#!@15 @!tl @@@@@@@@@@ @@@@@@@ttlltt~ ~a~~a~ y~~,,II g. oo,~®~~~~~ L~ Z ~~ U D Z N [, ,~Uj oZ, ~CVOJ ~m ~i ~ ~~ N VI ~~ N ~~ 3~~J ,b• y33tly5 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a -°x y AFU n~ ~~I~ ,~pyP ~~~ e- ry !. @@ ~ ~ ~!~ / ~~ \ ~3 .rim <?%=`, t \`, ~ a ~ o i I w e 'a =0 a F ~~~' ~g~ ~~ 8~ 8 PPS , z ~ ~~ 0 / z a~ y C7 ~ Z 6 a C Q R ~ g RR 9 a e !PR 9 9lR9 4! i"! e e t 4 9 .": a i RJR p ~~Rp e~ ..f • 9 ppp!B Se f t~f f ~~; i j Y ;i pi ei eie ei ei ei ei t~tpip e+` +ie e°ej ! 999 9 9999 99 999 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ i~°~ i iEy~pi6~ 3 t ~ 3~. ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i~~l3 ~ A ~l~f~ ~1 F€ 41~ ~~~ l~e ~~e ii! i t#7E 3ii3 i 2e 2i° d O(~o ~ ~ ®~ '~8 ! a ~ U U ,~ Q- ~' '_R ~2 YSY ~. Z F a, tt Z~ 0 3 t h a N • e~`.m._ - -~ - ~_._ ~__ _~._ -d-__r._ .~a_~_ _o~~ _~, r... nn r~q 0. ~P eA~~A a .. P r®mvr _ ~-~.... A SHRUB SPRAY SPRINKLER/ROTOR B POP-UPSPRINKLEW ROTOR C ELECTRIC CONTROIAER D BAIL VALVE E ELECTRIC ANGLE VALVE f ~ _ ~.a.. Ll.,.a,.. ~~ »,...e .,rbx.:v r ~~„ lil mar ~i ~ ~ (~-~- ~ ._ ~~... i ter °~..., ` > I t~pV~ _ I e L ,..w L ~~ ~ .e ~.~ ..m ~~ F REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER G TYPICAL P O C H SHRUB SPRAY HEAD " I GROUND COVER FLAMING J TREE/ SHRUB PLANTING r .o~.~ .e.e.,.. A8.e ,e.e.,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ rmnmr-- ~.e N Es -='... ems. "", ^"°°'°'...^"m ^" ' „~° °^ ........,.. ~r~sw N DEEP ROOT BARRIER :4. ~---~' =--.••s T- -"`... "'"'°"' _ _- ~ _o~Y~u ---~ .~.p,... ..~s....~.r ~- ~ ~ _ - ~~Y~s ~ ~~ M ~ I-~ 9~i~ ~~ t ~_~r _ _ <. CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION DETARS rnncr iciou SI OPFS ,~ ., ~,.s,.... ""-'J '.~ I ~ '~g'~TID , TYPICAL FRONT YARDS AND FUEL MOD6~7CATION w nwmvw,u ftM5NNU5 ~~ _ ~~ ~____ R TREE STAKING L TREE STN(ING SLOPE ONLY M TREEI SHRUB PUWTING - SEP 17200A DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Doug Fenn August 31, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES - A review of site plan and elevations for 29single-family detached homes on 11 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of W ilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0225-071-74 and 77 Related files Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT16100, SUBTT14496, and SU8TT14496-1 This protect is based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) previously certified bythe County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and the Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m 2001 This protect is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR ORAL REPORT AND PLANS WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Coleman, McPhail, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant presented revised elevations and floor plans The Committee recommended approval as revised .~ ~Lp cam`` ,('> (4~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Doug Fenn August 17, 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES - A review of site plan and elevations for 29 single-family detached homes on 11 5 acres of land m the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of W ilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN 0225-071-74 and 77. Related files Tentative Tract Maps SUBTT16100, SUBTT14496, and SUBTT14496-1. This project is based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) previously certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors m 1991 and the Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2001 This project is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR. Design Parameters The applicant proposes the exact same elevation product of their previously approved single-family development of Blackstone Ridge across the street of Day Creek Boulevard. The proposed project, Blackstone Ridge East, is for 29 homes with four elevations such as Ranch, Country, Monterey, and Bungalow. The square footage of these homes varies from 3,889 to 4,633 square feet The prolect is in conformance with Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development. Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this prolect 1 Architecture -The Committee should carefully review the side and rear elevations based upon recent Commission concerns with "boxy appearance," lack of articulation, and detail Staff believes that the proposed design has suffiaent variation of form, massing, articulation The design details are consistent with the architectural style of the front elevations. 2 Decks -The decks should be a standard feature, not an option, for all lots that have reverse frontage on Day Creek Boulevard or lots along Street "A "The supporting structural members on the decks should match the secondary materials on the houses (aver rock, stacked stone, brick, etc) The secondary material should be carried up to the deck flooring The decks should have upgraded treatment and variation consistent with architectural style of home. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval subject to revised plans addressing the above comments prior to scheduling for Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Fong, Stewart Staff Planner Doug Fenn The Committee explained to the applicant that commentaries have been received recently from City leaders and concerned residents that the architecture of the homes are identical In response, the Planning Commission will regwre new projects to have/a vpariety of design, will not accept two-story ~'((~ / DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00330-GRANITE HOMES August 17, 2004 Page 2 box without substantial variation to the bwlding plane and roof plane, and, in a minimum, a single-story product will have to be included However, the Committee stated that because this product has been in the process for some time, they would not ask for the single-story product but would regwre the house design to have exceptional architectural treatment as follows The bwlding design should have architectural elements and treatment that would be true to its style For example a San Juan style home would not have the same roof pitch as a Country style home, or use of the same vents design for ali architectural styles The design for each archtectural style should be very distinctive 2. Break up the building plane for the side elevations with dormers, window pot-outs, etc 3. Design the fireplace and chimney to fit the architectural style and treat them with rich materials such as river rock, stone, etc 4. Use arch windows for the San Juan and Monterey architectural styles 5. Enhance the design of the balconies and decks with solid decorative columns and fence, and rich materials Some decks should include roof coverings Balcornes and decks are a standard for Lots 1 through 5 6. Use decorative material such as split-face block for perimeter protect walls, corner side, return walls, and interior side yard walls All walls should have a decorative cap 7. Provide disclosure statement to all future buyers regarding its proximity to a proposed school /~-~70 . RESOLUTION NO 04-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2004-00330, A REVIEW OF SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR 29 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON 11 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0172-74 AND 77 ` A Recitals 1 Granite Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review No DRC2004-00330, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of October 2004, the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on October 27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The protect site has a density of 2 6 dwelling units to the acre, which is within the permitted density range of the Low Residential Distnct, and b The project falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, which inGuded a conceptual layout fora 29 lot single-family development at this location, and c The project meets or exceeds all applicable technical regwrements and the design guidelines of Development Agreement No CO 00-088 and the Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and . b The proposed use is in accordance with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-113 DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES October 27, 2004 Page 2 c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity. 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the Urnversity/Crest Planned Development m July 1991 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bernardino certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No. 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August 2000, the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes m the project that would require a mayor revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together with all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and concludes as follows a There have not been substantial changes m the protect that require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase m the seventy of the previously identified significant effects, and b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase m the seventy of previously identified significant effects, and c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed m the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown m the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altemative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altemative 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every conddion set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-113 DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES • October 27, 2004 Page 3 Planning Division 1) Where slope conditions require retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading permits 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of sidewalk and block walls on all comer lots 3) A 2-foot wide bench shall be provided at all perimeter walls 4) Side yard retaining wall heights shall be a maximum of 4 feet 5) All return, interior side and rear walls shall be of block matenai 6) The Developer shall provide a written nonce, in the form of a disclosure, to each prospective buyer of the Fourth Street Rock Crushing Facility located northwest of the project site The disclosure shall inform the homebuyer of the use of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard as a truck route to and from the rock crushing facility and the occurrence of truck traffic noise 7) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of comer lots written notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of cash deposit on the property 8) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real, or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 9) Decorative pavement shall be provided on the driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdivision Engineering Division 1) „All applicable conditions of Planning Resolution No 02-08 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16100 shall apply 2) Install private landscaping and imgation system in the side yard parkways of comer Lots, 1, 9, 10, 17, and 18 pnor to public improvements being accepted by the City Environmental Mitigation • 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development), as covered by the EIR and Supplemental EIR /i~~ // PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-113 DRC2004-00330 -GRANITE HOMES October 27, 2004 Page 4 (SEIR) certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991 and October 1999, respectively, and Initial Study! Addendum, prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2000 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Acting Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00330 SUBJECT: 29 LOT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: GRANITE HOMES LOCATION: NORTH OF W ILSON -EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-113, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file rn the Planning Diwsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code . regulations, the Etiwanda University Planned Development SC-1-04 1 Comoletlon Date -/-/- / / / / / / ~`/~/ Protect No DRC2004-00330 Comole6on Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Rewsed site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 Ali site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdwision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/ /_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, _/ / including proper illumination 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape ~ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/ /_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 12 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 13 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 14 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 15 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/ maintain an open feeling and enhance views 16 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property SC-1-04 ~J ~~"' Protect No DRC200400330 Comolehon Date 17 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products ~D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage drroeways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees requred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requued by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained m a healthy and thnvmg condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Dvision / / / / / / / / / / -/-~ / / / / / / / / SC-1-04 3 ~'~ Protect No DRC2004-00330 Comolehon Date 8 Specal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Day Creek Boulevard ublic right-of-way on the red to be installed within the t / /~ p ems requ 9 Landscaping and irrigation sys _ _ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _I_/_ Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposd on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special _/_/ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways _/_/_ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/_/_ tssuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if • appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of _/_/ the acousttcal report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and ~ exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR • COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, SC-1-04 Y~~7 g Project No DRC2004-00330 Comolehon Date d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00330) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _I_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _I_I_ the City poor to permd tssuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls -/-/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Budding and Safety Drvision 6 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal regwrements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (t e , DRC2004-00330) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mayor addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ SC-1-04 ~~ Protect No DRC2004-00330 Comolehon Date L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading _/_/ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial ~ conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of building permits , 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _!_/ N. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/ from frame or track in any manner O. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/ /_ visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 6 ~-g0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS June 23, 2004 Tract 16100 SFR E/S Daycreek Blvd & N/O Wilson DRC2004-00330 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT, WHICH REFLECT CONDITIONS FOR FUEL MODIFICATION PLANS, THE GUIDELINES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS AND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION WITH A SINGLE POINT OF ACCESS, PLEASE REFERENCE FSC-4 AND FSC-7. FR-2 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND FUEL MODIFICATION PLANS APPLY TO LOTS 3-7,12-15 AND 20-21. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdehnes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gmdehnes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a For single-family residential projects m the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants aze to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extenor of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances For structures m excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 /~1 d 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provtde requtred fire flow 4 Fire protection water plans are requtred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for revtew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire spnitkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Cahfomia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed in' 1. Buildings constructed m the designed Hazardous Fire Areas which include a. All structures that do not meet Fire Distnct access requirements (see Fire Access) b When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure Approved Fire Department Access: The approved mitigation for construction and automatic fire spnitklers installation is as follows 1) Homes on lots 1-9 located on Moondance and Brookstone Place may be constructed with a single point of access from Daycreek Blvd. 2) Homes on lots 10-17 on Dundee Ct may be constructed with a single point of access if automatic fire spnnklers are installed in all the homes and garages west of lot 17 3) Homes on lots east of lot 17 may not be built until the second point of access is completed 4) A copy of the approved Alternative Method, if applicable, must be reproduced on the azchrtectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Frre Hazazd Seventy Zone" (VHFHSZ), Crty of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside Distnct", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhtbtt V-7 as HiQki Probability-HiQkt Consequence for Fue Rtsk These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Ftre Area" as defined by the Ftre Dtstnct The Hazardous Ftre Area is based on maps produced by the Caltfomta Department of Forestry and Ftre Protection and the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga 1. Hazard Reduction Plans The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the constructton of the buildings in accordance with the County of San Bemardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A Ftre Area FR-1 or FR-2 requirements apply to the construction of the buildings based on the slope of the teiram and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans The development code provides standards regulating and requinng a Fire resistive roof assemblies b Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c Ftre Dtstnct access roadways d Fue resistive construction and protection of openings 2 e Ftre spnnkler systems f Ftre flow cntena . For construction requrements m the "Hazard Ftre Area" refer to the following web site http //www co san-bernardmo ca us/landuseservtces/DevCode (Chapter 2 Hazard Protectiou, Article 2 Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy Also reference RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A 2 Construction requirements for the Hazardous Fire Area (This is not a complete list of requtrements and some requrements may not apply to FR-2 Areas) a The roof shall be a Class "A" fire-resistive assembly approved by Building and Safety Fire- retardant Class "A" wood shakes and shingles shall be listed to comply with the 10-year "natural" weathenng test Class "A" roof assemblies shall be installed to accordance with their hstmg and manufacturer's instructions b The space between rafters at the extenor walls shall be-solidly filled with tight-fitting wood blocks 1-1/2 inches thick The eaves may also be "boxed" c The exposed surface of extenor wall must be a part of a list2d one-hour fire resistive assembly d All extenor doors must be of a solid wood core type Dual pane glass is required for all glass m doors e All windows and shdmg glass doors shall be constructed of dual-pane glass f. Cantilevered or standard type decks shall be constructed in accordance with one of the following 1 A minimum of 1-1/2 inch lumber for all the framing and any deck matenals 2 Protection must be provided on the underside of the deck by matenals approved for one (1) hour fire-resistive construction. 3 Be ofnon-combustible matenals, as defined in the Building Code g Patio covers attached or within 10-feet of a residential structure shall not be constructed of matenals less than 1/2-inch in thickness Plastic, bamboo, straw, fiberglass or wood-lattice less than 1/2-inch m thickness are not permitted h All required fences adjacent to fuel modification azeas or wildland areas built as conditions of approval shall be of non-combustible matenals as defined in the Building Code Any fence within 10-feet of the fuel modification azea or wildland azea shall be non-combustible; Beyond 10-fee[, [he fence may be constructed of any approved matenal All other fences, including those on the intenor of the project are not subject to this requirement i Roadways shall be provided along the project penmeter exposed to a fire hazard or fuel modified area The roadway is to allow fire distnct vehicle access Such roadways shall be a minimum twenty (20) feet in width, with a grade not to exceed fourteen percent (14%) and capable of supporting fire ftghting vehicles 3 Fuel Modification Requirements The applicant shall prepaze fuel modification plans for the site m accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Gmdelmes and RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A For the fuel medication plan requirements, refer to the following web site httn //www lacofd orpJforestry%SFfolder/pdf/fmnQ ndf A The preliminary fuel medication plans shall: 1 Show all property lines, contour lines and locations of proposed buildings or structures 2 Show the 100-foot defensible space for slopes less than 15%, for steeper slopes and lazger defensible space may be required (Per RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A) around the structure 3 Show each fuel modification zone (setback, imgation method, thinning and interface thinning) 3 ~~ 4 Show existing vegetation impacted by the required fuel modification and proposed vegetation to be planted m the fuel modification azea, if any The preliminary plans should be sensitive to rare, threatened or endangered species and the applicant must be prepared to address their disposition in the final plans • 5 Include photographs of the area that show the type of vegetation currently existing, including the height, density and relationship to grade 6 Describe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply with the fuel modification plans 7 Descnbe on the plans the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, pazks and/or green space 600-feet beyond the site or development property line in all directions State on the plans who will have ultimate responsibility for maintenance of the fuel modification zones The applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modification hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures B The final fuel modification plans shall: 1 Clearly indicate each fuel modification zone (setback, imgation method, thinning and interface thinning). Also indicate locations of permanent zone identification mazkers 2. Include imgation plans and specifications 3. Include the landscape plan The landscape plan must identify the location and type of supplemental plantings The plans and specifications shall include both the common and botanical names of new and existing plants within the fuel modification azea Cleazly indicate on the plans the disposition of impacted existing vegetation and identifying those proposed for retention All groundcover, shrub, plants and trees are required to be fire- resistive maccordance with three (3) published references for fire safe vegetation Refer to the following web site http://www.ucfpl.cuop.edu/FMI-Zone.XIV paEes 168 to 177.htm 4 Indicate any special or specific landscape maintenance intended for the site such as pruning, "hmbing up", mowing, etc 5. Descnbe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply with the fuel modification plans 6. Descnbe the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, parks and/or green space 600- feetbeyond the site or development property tine m ali directions 7. Note the names, addresses and phone numbers of the responsible parties for the maintenance of the fuel modification zones 8. Include on the title sheet the conditions of approval, CC&R's and/or any deed instructions related to the site or final fuel modification area Include a copy of the approved prehmmazy fuel modification plans with this submittal 9 Provide a copy of the proposed fuel modification maintenance documents to be recorded The maintenance agreements must be perpetual m the event of property transfer and/or a change m Board of Directors for the Homeowner's Association 10 Indicate that the developer will implement the required measures of the approved fuel modification hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District, before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project Fire Construction Services must be summoned for an on-site inspection and approval prior to the issuance of the building permit 5 Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval Specific fire protection measures that may be regwred to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to ~ig a A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle b Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks . c Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day d For welding, cutting or gnndeng work, clear away all combustible matenal from the area azound such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services pnor to cutting, welding or gnndmg work e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate azea dunng the operation FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire Distnct approval of a preliminary fuel modification hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an mdrndual or firm qualified and expenenced m wildfire hazard mitigation planning Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modificahon/hazazd reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire Distnct before the introduction of any combustible matenals into the project area Approval Is subject to an on-site mspechon. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modificahon/hazazd reduction plan requirements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire Distnct staff Schedule the mspechon with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 . FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any buildiug permits: 1 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project All required publtc fire hydrants shall be Installed, flushed and operable pnor to dellvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and wetness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Sernces shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a cleazance before lumber is dropped 2 Fuel Modification Plaus Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Flre Hazardous Area requerements 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the requerements of • the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road ~' 0~ 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and subm~ttmg the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER . The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Fire Construction Services' policies PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker md~cating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkers" On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 3 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 4. Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with mm~mum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be mtemally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bu~ldmg setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 5 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 6 ~'~~ T H E C I T Y O RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE October 27, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Lawrence J Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00272 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, with a Master Plan Designation for the entire site, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue - APN 0209-092-04 Related file Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00273 -LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning from Industrial Park (Subarea 6) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site; establish a Master Plan Overlay District pursuant to RCMC 17 20 030 for the entire site, and adjust the Haven Overlay District Boundary approximately 60 feet easterly consistent with the land use designation change, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue -APN 0209-092-04 Related file General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density The proposal would allow for Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unit per acre) for approximately 20 55 acres There is no development application or master plan proposed at this time B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Apartments, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) • South - Single-family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant land, Industrial Park and Haven Office Overlay District West - Single-family detached homes, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS "E & D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00272 AND DRC2004-00273 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 2 C General Plan Desionations Pro/ect Site - Industrial Park, Haven Avenue Office Overlay Distract over the easterly half North - Medum-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Industnal Park West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site is vacant and was previously used as the "La Mancha" Golf Course, which was abandoned over two decades ago (Exhibit "A") The property is a relatively flat site with many trees in a state of decline ANALYSIS A General General Plan Amendments are supported when it is determined that they are consistent with other goals within the current General Plan and when there is new information that was not known during the last revision that /ustifies the requested amendment In June, at the applicant's request, the City Council held a toint workshop with the Planning Commission to discuss the Haven Avenue Overlay District and the possibility of housing adtacent to, but outside, the overlay district The matority of the City Council expressed an openness to housing as requested by the applicant There was a unanimous position of the City Council and the Planning Commission that any protect proposed should be upscale There was also strong support for retaining the use and character of the Haven Overlay District The toint workshop concluded that the City should have an open mind to the applicant's proposal In light of the comments from the /oint City Council/Planning Commission meeting of June 15, 2004, the applicant has prepared documents tustifying the proposed change. The Justification for a Zone Change outlines changes in the current real estate market place (Exhibit "B") The Fiscal Impact Analysis demonstrates a positive revenue protection for residential over office use (Exhibit "C") Staff has reviewed the reports and agrees with the applicant that changes have and will continue to occur that would cause us to consider a mix of uses on this property This property is one of the last large, single ownership parcels of its kind in the heart of the City's industrial area It has always been designated with a Master Plan regwrement Budding the block as a Master Plan is critical Therefore, it is staffs opinion that a Master Plan requirement should always remain with the property even if a change of use is considered In changing land uses from Industrial/Commercal Office to Residential, a critical goal is the desired fobs-housing balance that we envision for our City A truly balanced goal would be to have an equal number of fobs available for the number of workers that reside in the City Our current projection under the existing General Plan is about 7 fobs per person The City's first General Plan envisioned a S fobs per person goal This reduction is the result of land use. changes over the last 15 years that changed approximately 542 acres of Industnal/Commercial land to residential This is an average of 36 acres of land per year It is estimated that on average, 13 fobs are created per acre of Industrial/Commercial land Citywide C~~ a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00272 AND DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY • October 27, 2004 Page 3 Cumulative impact in the conversion of Industrial Park/Office to Residential is a concern from a loss of lobs As the City moves to bwld-out in approximately 2008, each land use request must be carefully considered In addition to the lobs-housing balance, and the change of land use from Industrial to Residential, there are several concerns, most notably, land use compatibility with neighboring uses of both an existing and planned nature and possible impacts to muniapal and school district services of both a protect and cumulative nature The applicant has "submitted a protect justification statement referenced earlier that states the land use change is warranted from a land real estate market analysis standpoint (Exhibit "B") In summary, the applicant's information indicates a strong demand for residential and a low demand for Industnal Park, especially Office If residential uses are to be considered for this protect site, the type and intensity of residential is important to both the existing and future surrounding uses A neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant on September 19, 2004, and those present were concerned with any change that would negatively effect their current home values and that they would have a chance to review any new proposal There was also a request that some affordable housing be included with the protect No affordable housing is being considered at this time In response to concerns to increased service demands in comparison to new development revenue for Residential versus Industnal Park and Office, the applicant prepared a Fiscal Impact Analysis dated September 7, 2004 (Exhibit "C") This report indicates there will still be a positive outcome of revenue to service costs for the proposed protect The residential amendment request is reasonably compatible with the existing residential uses and designations to the west, north, and south The concern regarding land use compatibility is primarily related to the remaining 17 23 acres of Industnal Park, Haven Boulevard Office Overlay area to the east of the subject amendment area If approved, the amendment would place future single-faintly residential use immediately adjacent to the Haven Boulevard Office Overlay zone, which is not currently experienced anywhere else along this major thoroughfare The primary incompatible factor would be the loss of privacy for the future residential use adjacent to future multi-story office development The regwrement for a Master Plan overlay as part of the amendment will allow the City to place controls on both the residential protect and the office protect to address issues of buffering techniques such as building setbacks, height, and landscape setbacks and access issues between the two protects Because it is typically not a good land use transition to go from a high-rise office zone to asingle-family detached housing zone, buffering techrnques through the master plan review will be critical Applicable General Plan policies, which may have a bearing on the requested amendment, are provided as follows 2.6.1.5.4 Development design should capitalize on clustering techniques to facilitate efficient use of land and provide for open space and other neighborhood amenities. e ~~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00272 AND DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY . October 27, 2004 Page 4 Discussion: We particularly seek this approach for residential uses in the Medium, Medrum-High, and Hrgh Densely categories, although rt can apply to any land use, including commercial, office, industrial, and civic uses Our extensrve use of master planning and specific planning techniques has resulted in excellent examples of this approach We want to see more of that approach used wherever the size and configuration of development pro/ects will allow 2.6.1.5.5 Development for properties of sufficient size should be designed through some form of master planning device. Discussion: Some of our best developments have used community plan, specrfic plan, or some other form of master plannrng to create a coherent and livable environment We support that approach wherever rt can be applied Our General Plan and zoning maps designate such areas, but others maybe subsequently added for appl~cat~on of this approach as well. 6.4.1.6 The intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, extending south to 4th Street, should form the central business hub of the City with higher intensity office, commercial, and . public/quasi-public uses. bu Iduoutrw thin orur ctommunoity.a Business s tes fronU g onto Haviein Avenue aretreserved for multiple story office and other commercral business uses pursuant to an overlay district established in connection with our extensrve Indusfial Area specrfic Plan Thrs General Plan further provides policy direction fora 31-acre mixed-use development at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Thrs intersection is now comprised of a strong and vibrant mix of public serwce, commercral, and historic uses at three of the four corners. Future development at the remaining comer will anchor the Haven Avenue office comdor, as well as strengthen the role of this intersection as a "town center" complex with complementary community-oriented uses 7.2 Economic Development Issues. Issue: How does the City maintain a strong and diversified industnalfbusiness park economy Discussion: The industnaUbusiness park pattern for the City is already well established and should be maintained to provide economic balance and diversrficatron There are a number of locational attributes including rail service, freeway access, and a good network of arterial roads Also, the opening of the 1-210 Freeway in the near future will further enhance the locational desirability of the City The long-term capital budgeting program needs to maintain the existing public facilities and expand the system as appropriate Issue: How does the City continue to maintain a fiscally healthy City in order to continue to provide a high quality of public services prov ded which attract both res dents and bus ~esses bland usesr~hat axle p pose) d to become patrt of the General Plan need to be evaluated as to their abil~fy to continue to generate sufficient public ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00272 AND DRC2004-00273 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY + October 27, 2004 Page 5 revenues to offset future public costs and prowde for adequate reserves The General Plan fiscal model needs to be applied and updated on a regular basis 7.4.11 Enhance Haven Avenue Overlay District. Discussion: Currently, the City has an overlay zone along Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard The issue is whether the overlay, which regulates the height of office buildings m the d~stnct, should be retained That rs, will the demand for higher density office space over the General Plan bwld-out period make this the highest and best uses The growth of the business sector rn Rancho Cucamonga and the expansion of the Ontario Airport will continue to mFluence this demand Wdl the demand be strong enough to retain the overlay or should lower density business park and R&D uses be allowed with an eventual recycling of those land uses when the office demand becomes sfronger~ The City should continue to maintain this overlay district to encourage higher density office development, but also evaluate development proposals on a case-by-case basis as the office market evolves in Inland Empire 7.4.18 Maintain a Strong and Diversified Industrial Economy. Discussion: The Industrial belt along the southern edge of the City should be protected from intrusions of other uses that would weaken the competitive value of this area for industrial uses It is well served by rail, arterial highway, and freeway access The employment and revenue value of the industrial sector to the City, including strong non-retail taxable sales, is too great to let it erode away through piecemeal conversions to other uses In selected cases, there maybe compelling reasons to shift from traditional industrial uses, such as those ad/scent to the Ontario Mtlls along 4th Street and along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor The mdustnal/business park pattern for this area is already well established and should be maintained to provide economic balance, labor force, income, and taxable sales benefits B Joint City Council / Planrnng Commission Workshop A joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop was held on June 15, 2004 Minutes of the workshop are attached for reference (Exhibit "D") C Technical Review Committee Since the applicant withdrew the Tentative Tract Map and Master Plan documents on July 15, 2004, there are no technical review comments In addition, a Land Use Amendment may not be conditioned under state law D Neiohborhood Meetmg A neighborhood meeting was held on September 19, 2004 Several residents from the neighborhood attended with most questions related to the future Development aspects A copy of the meeting notes and sign-m sheet is attached (Exhibit "E") E Environmental Assessment A Mitigated Negatwe Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes The Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore are attached to this report The mitigations noted in the Initial Study will be imposed on any future development ~~~ s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00272 AND DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 6 FACTS FOR FINDING Facts for finding are contained in the attached resolutions for each application CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within an extended notification area beyond the standard 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION Based on the discussions that took place during the toint City Counal/Planning Commission Workshop, staff is prepared to follow the possible change in land use policy direction accordingly Therefore, draft Resolutions of Approval have been attached for Planning Commission consideration However, because some of the Planning Commissioners had expressed concerns with the proposed amendment, and in the interest of not delaying the applicant's ability to proceed to the City Council, Resolutions recommending denial have also been included for consideration, The Planning Commission's recommendations will be forwarded to the City Counal for final action Respectful) ubmitted, A~ Brad uller City Planner BB LH\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Site Location Map Exhibit "B" -Justification for a Zone Change Exhibit "C" -Fiscal Impact Analysis Exhibit "D" -Joint City Counal/Planning Commission Minutes dated June 15, 2004 Exhibit "E" -Neighborhood Meeting Notes and Sign In Sheet Exhibit "F" -Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 Draft Resolution of Denial for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Distract Amendment DRC2004-00273 Draft Resolution of Denial for Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 C~~~~ • EXHIBIT "A" S#TE LC?G~.T#~Jt~# ~~#.1^ ~ ,/ /~ ~RC2oo~-00272 (~~~,, ~ rS ~i/, ( ~,'RC20Q4-0027::. (t~}. C)~':, Lewis Operating Corp. • 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P 0 Box 670 /Upland, Caltforma 91785-0670 Telephone (909) 985-0971 FAX (909) 949-6700 Justification for Zone Change: Haven and Arrow Site The following report rllustrates the~ustrficatron for changing a portion of the Haven and Arrow site from office use to resrdentral use National Office Demand Drivers Subsequent to the approval of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the office mazket m the United States was reasonably robust rn most metropolrtan azeas Shortly after 2000, many U S corporatrons began to recognize the benefits of using the labor forces of . emerging mazkets to assrst them m dnvrng costs downward and qualrty upwazd. At the same trine, many emerging market countries began mazketmg therr hrghly educated English speakrng labor force Specrfically, countries tike the Phrlrppmes and Indra began provrdmg servrces to consu]Ung, medreal, and consumer finance companies At the same rime, long drstance telephone compazues became de-regulated, experienced mayor financral restructururgs (including the farlure of WorldCom), and rmplemented new technology and constructed new infrastructure that, combined, led to raprd downwazd pressure on long drstance telephone rates The result of the reduced long drstance rates and the orgazuzatlon of highly skrlled ]ow cost off=shore labor pools was a decrease m demand for domesric office space and an exportation of millions of fobs to overseas employers The exportatron oflobs has led to the decreased demand for office space in the Unrted States In Downtown Los Angeles, for example, office burldrngs thapt~odnc~e Dxl. 3/152004 T " ~l I Puryose To pmv~de~usnficavon for the rezoning of the Havrn and Arrow sue to residcnual use 11 C ~l~ ~ • housed finance and consulting employers are being converted to residental dwelling units Moreover, subsequent to the adoption of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the consulring rndustry began relying on the pracrice of "hotelmg," a concept that involves multiple employees shanng the same work space at different rimes, generally, flits phenomenon has reduced the average space per worker by more than 15% since the adoption of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (National Assoctat~on of Office and Industrial Properties-2003) The sluff m national office demand has caused a downward sluff rn the demand for local office space, which rs ~usnficat~on for the re-designation of a portion of the Arrow and Haven site from the industrial park des~gnahon to residential. State Office Demand Drivers • The State of California has experienced an exodus of~obs as a result of high costs of workers compensation and the relatively unfriendly business environment in California. The result of the fob exodus is a sluff m corporate demands for office space in California as corporations find more business fi-iendly environments and less expensive labor costs m Nevada and Arizona. The shift m corporate demand for office space as a result of Cahfomia public policy is addrttonal~ustificarion for the re-designation of a portion of the Haven and Arrow site from industrial park to residential Local Office Supply Prior to the adoption of the general plan, the Ontario Center (approximately 200 acres) was not expected to be developed in the near tenn due to the known existence of asbestos containing material on the site and the City of Ontario's announce plans for a mayor sports arena (including a proposed NFL arena) and the City of Ontario's plans for an Prepared by DRL snsnooa Purpose To prov,deiusnfiwnon for the rezoning of the Haven and Arrow site to resdrnnal use ~ ~v ~ extension of the Ontano Mill's retail operation to include a hfestyle retatl component Subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan the City of Ontano scrapped its plans for a mator sports azena Moreover, the realization of the Vtctona Gardens Regtonal Mal] has virtually eliminated any of Ontano's hopes for a hfestyle retail center As a result of the ehminatron of a mayor sports component and a hfestyle retatl component to the Ontano Center, the Ctty of Ontano has indicated that tt expects the Ontano Center to become a destination for mayor high nse corporate offices The change m land uses in the Ontano Center will result to the addition of approxtmately 500,000 squaze feet of potential office space that clearly out-positions the Haven and Arrow site Moreover, the Vtctona Gardens Regtonal Mall office component, surrounded by sernces desired by office users, coupled with excellent freeway access, will easily out-position the Haven and Arrow site In addition to the Ontano Center and Vtctona Gardens build out, Cazo] . plowman of Lee and Associates and Taylor Ing of CB Rtchazd Ellis, the regions most knowledgeable experts of the office mazket m the Inland Empire, forecast approxtmately ],000,000 square feet of office ]and that is ctitrently to the supply pipeline. In 2003 about 300,000 square feet of office space was net-absorbed to the area Based on the addttton of new office space m the next 18 months, tt is anticipated that office vacancy will increase and that potential office users will have a wide vanety of office product to choose from The fact that the office market is on the verge of being over-built, and the fact that there aze a multitude of sites that corporate office users will choose over the Haven and Arrow site provides a compelling justification for the re-designation of this relatively small pomon of the Haven and Arrow site Prepared by DRL 3/112004 Puryose To provtdeiust~ficatton for the rezoning of the Havrn and Arrow ste to restdrnttal use ~~~ /0 Perception of Haven Corridor Pnor to the adoprion of the General plan, the City's leaders believed that Haven Avenue would be the "next MacArthur Blvd " Subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan, the owner occupied office market, fueled by low long term interest rates and avazlable financing, caused an abnormally high level of "for-sale" office and condominium office development A lazge portion of this development has occurred on Haven Avenue. The replacement of corporate office with owner occupied service-type office along Haven has re-set the office user's perceprion of Haven as a corporate office destination. With the exception of Haven Avenue in Ontano, corporate offices will not locate on Haven Avenue south of Arrow Avenue. Since corporate offices will not locate on Haven Avenue, the Haven Avenue office demand will be limited to service office and owner- • occupied or small scale rental office product, this type of product does not require the depth or parking that mid-nse and high nse office does. Based on the fact that the most likely office users will only want Haven Avenue frontage, and these office users do not have parking fields that require significant depth, there is ~ushficarion for the re- designation of a portion of the Haven and Arrow site for residential development to reflect realistic future demand Cues from Milliken Avenue Milliken Avenue has many similaz charactenstics to Haven Avenue Pnor to the Adoption of the General Plan, office industry experts expected the comer of 4a' and Milliken to become a mayor office and retail hub Subsequent to the approval of the General plan, the City approved a mixed use project that included aparrinents and stnp retail, upon approval of the 4th and Milliken project, industry experts began t oaga, ae~ Dan 3/152004 Purpose To pmvrde tusnficanon for [he rezoning of the Haven and Arrow' sne to resrdenLa] use e~~il corporate office users will generally not locate north of 4a' Street to Arrow Avenue, to be • sure, some office users will continue to locate north of Arrow adjacent to City and County buildings and neaz Foothill Boulevard Most industry experts, including Cazol Plowman and Taylor Ing, regard the Millilten and 6a' Street office protect as a failure The Milliken and 7`s street office complex was vacant for neazly 18 months after completion and has currently been leased at extremely discounted rates Industry experts have regazded the Milliken and 7`" street project as a predictor of future corporate office success north of 4`s Street. The fact that Milliken Avenue, subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan, has proven to be increasingly less desirable for office tenants provides a cue and ~usUfication for the re-zomng of a portion of Haven Avenue and Arrow to reflect current market demands Cues from the Past The Barton Plaza at Foothill and Arrow was one of Rancho Cucaznonga's first mayor modem corporate office locations The Barton plaza has been hugely unsuccessful and has been in foreclosure three tunes since its opemng m the late 1980's Currently, Barton Plaza houses the Umversity of La Verne and Century 21-Beachside, these tenants aze hardly corporate office users and, in fact, could have located in ]ow-nse office space anywhere m the City The fact that corporate office has not been sustainable at one of the City's mayor intersections is justification for the re-designation of a portion of the Haven and Arrow site to residential use from office use. r1 L..J Prepazed by DRL 3/152004 Purpose To provide )usnficanon for the remrung of the Havrn and Arrow sne to res~drnnal use ~ An /~ Community Stabilization Pnor to the General Plan Adoption, the portion of Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to 26's Street was undeveloped and it was uncertain what the future land uses would be in the City Subsequent to the approval of the General Plan, Footlull and Haven was vacant, the site is currently under construction with more than 400 apartment homes. The fact that there will ultimately be a lazge section of the Foothill to 26a' Street azea that will house rental tenants means that there is a greater chance for instability in the area as there will be a lazge group ofnon-stakeholder residents The addition of for-sale detached housing will provide commumty stabilization m the area and therefore provides additional ~ustificahon for the re-designation of a portion of the Haven and Arrow site as a means of stabilizing the current housing stock and the commumty itself • Stimulation of Retail Development The Arrow and Haven site is 37 acres, the site is larger than needed for commercial and retail users The change of a portion of the site to a residential designation.vill stimulate retazl and office use as the site will transfer hands from investors to developers. The fact that retail and commercial development will occur as a result of the change inland use for the westerly portion of the site provides additional~ustification for the change in land use from office to residential Land Use Context The Haven and Arrow site has a greater depth than the mdustna] park designated pazcels to the north and south of it The site is flanked by medrom high, low medium and ]ow • density residential designated areas to the north, west and south The site is zoned Prepared by DRL 3/15/2004 Purpose To prohdeiusttficanon for the rezoning of the Haven acid Arrow site to roscdennal use ~ ~D /3 industnal park, however the half of the site fronting Haven Avenue is designated with the Haven Avenue Overlay The Haven Avenue Overlay indicates that this mayor travel route for the City has the potential for high-end office development m a "campus-tike" setting with high Prestige value The character is intended to be intensive and lvgh quality. The proposed development for this site carves forward the intent of this Overlay designation on the portion of the site fronting Haven, while proposing residential development at the rear of the site which is more compatible with the residential development already surrounding the site on three sides Further, because a relatively intense, rriixed use development project, with a high density residential component, as well as hve/work amts, is on the ground to the north of the site at Haven and Footlnll Blvd , the rmxed office/cornmercial/residential nature of this comdor is akeady being reinforced with current development Finally, given the housing demand m southern Califomra today, and the demographic shifts m our population requiring the diversification of the housing product available to serve the mazket, an additional for sale housing product developed directly adjacent to, and within walking distance of, office, commercial, civic and open space uses in the City will provide convement hying opporhiities for Rancho Cucamonga's residents Fiscal Context In fight of the State of Cahfonia's current fiscal cnsis, it is also important to bear m mind changes which may occur m the near future to state and local financing structures The "fiscalization of land use" has traditionally colored mumcipalmes land use decision n LJ i making m favor ofnon-residential uses The so called "tnple flip", part of the March 2 passage of Proposition 57, suspends one-quarter of the Bradley-Burns sales andP ~ bYa D>u. siisnooa Purpose To prov~deiusuficauon for the rezoning of the Haven and Arrow site to resdrnnal use ~ ~n/~0 which went to local mumcipahhes, replaces the lost revenues on adollar-for-dollar basis with funds set aside from the countywide property tax revenues (pnmanly ERAF), and increases the State's sales and use tax by one-quarter percent with the State increase dedicated to repayment of the bond measure Though a lawsuit has been filed challenging the reduction m the Bradley-Bums sales tax, the tnple flip is set to go into effect on July 1, 2004 Fundamentally, this "tnple flip" may start local governments on a new path and dec~s~on-making process with regard to approval of res~denhal land uses, as property tax revenues regain some importance in the overall mumcrpal finance prctur'e. Conclusion Given the ex~stmg land use context in the azea of this site, and based on the fact that, subsequent to the approval of the General Plan, the Rancho Cucamonga office sub- market, the Cahfortua office market, and the nattona] office market have expenenced a substantial downward sluff m demand ~s ample Jushficat~on for the change m land use designation for a portion of the Haven and Arrow site from office to res~dentra] use. Moreover, the change m office demand ~s not a lull, but m fact a long term fundamental sluff, the housing demand m southern Cahfornra is well documented and long-term m nature, and cities may soon receive a greater benefit from property tax revenue than m the past Based on the fact that, subsequent to the adoption of the general plan, the office product under construction and currently approved rs sigmficantly different than the stock ant~c~pated by the authors and creators of the general plan pnor to its approval, there rs ample ~ushficarion for changes m the land use designation for a portion of the Haven and Arrow site Finally, based on more focused study and office performance analysis subsequent to the approval of the general plan, industry experts have drastically changed Prepared by DRL 3/] 52004 Purpose To provtde~usnficanon for the rezoning of the Haven and Arrow site to resdennal use C ~~ /S their forecasts for the area. causing ~ust~ficatlon for the re-designation of the office designated parcels m the City • Prepared by DRL 3/152004 Purpose To provtdelusnficanon for the rezoning of the Haven and Arrow site to restdenna] use (' ~~ /~ -~ -~-~ Lewis Apartment Communities A memfRr of the Lewis group of companies 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P O Box 670 /Upland, Cahfomra 91785-0670 (909) 946-7514 /Fax (909) 931-5518 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL September 7, 2004 To: Mr Larry Henderson ~ Protect Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Crvic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 909-477-2700,x4303 From: Jams M Seiler/John R Young CI7y p~ Rq,UCN p CUCAMONCq stw o ? 200 N~NEI~~~ ` ~~ANNIr john young@lewiso~`tom (909)946-7514 Hand Delivered Re: Fiscal Impact Analysis Arrow and Haven -Tract Number 16909 DPFG -Development Planning and Financing Group, Inc. ITEMS BEING TRANSMITTED 1 copy - Fiscal Impact Analysis Arrow and Haven -Tract Number 16909 REMARKS Enclosed is the above referenced document for your review and use ACTION Please call me after you have reviewed this document I can be reached at (909) 946- 7514 Thank you ~XFI.1l.~~ ~ uCi, ~ ~ /~ r~~r DPFG DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & FINANCING GROUP INC September 2, 2004 Tom Ashcroft Lewis Operating CorporaUOn 1156 N Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 RE• Piscal Impact Analysts Arcow & Haven -Tract 16909 Dear Tom 2i127CAIIF,ARROYO,SUITI3IJIU s~v lunn cnNls'rRAN<~,CA 9167 TLL (949) 388-9269 FAX (949) ?Sri-9271 w„•e• dpig nom I am sending you this Fiscal Impact Analysts ("FIA") for your review and consideration. The FIA was prepazed to be consistent with a February 11, 2004 City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by Stanley R. ]ioffman Associates for the Henderson Creek States Project (the "Henderson Creek FIA") and the General Update Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc ,dated October 2, 2000 We ITave prepared three Runs as summarized below• Run No Land Usc Fiscal Impact Revenue/Cost Ratia Revenue/Cost Ratio . Analysis -No MVLF Impact -66%MVLF Result Reduction I Residential Only - 82 Units Positive 1 19 100 (lowest dense ) 2 RestdenUalOnly-164Unds Positive 139 l.lb (hi hest density) 3 Non-Residential Only Negative 0 30 0.30 - 275,000 SF Office As with the Henderson Creek FIA presentation, we have prepared each Run to show revenues from Motor Vehicle License Fees ("MVLf") under two scenarios (i) No cuts in MVLF, and (ti) 66%MVLF reduction due to potential California State budget cuts Runs 1 to 3 are also based on the 2003-04 fiscal year City budget For Run 3, we used the office valuation of $140 per sq k (i e, $120 per sq ft- for total secured valuation and $20 per sq. ft for unsecured valuation) to be consistent with the General Update Fiscal impact Analysis prepared by Stanley R Hoffman Associates, Inc ,dated October 2, 2000 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact myself, or Maik Aagaard at (949) 218-6030 Sincerely, ~" c ~~ ~ ~ Chns Lightbuine / RUN 1 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 1 -FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 sis~noos NO MVLF Im d Im ad on MVLF After Percent After Percent TABLE Buildout of Total Buildout of Total Annual Recurtina Revenues 2 $ 815 18 29 0°h $ 18,815 34 5% Property Tax Property Transfer Tax 2 , 1,421 2 2°h 1,421 2 6% Off-site sales and use tax 4 16,347 25 2% 16,347 30 0% Motor VehiGe Ucense In-Lieu 3 15,115 23 3% 5,038 9 2% Proposition 172 Sales Tax 4 335 0 5% Franchise Fees Utility 3 3,228 5 0% 3,228 5 9% Franchise Fees Refuse 3 2,066 3 2% 2,066 3 8% Franchise Fees Cable 3 1,556 24% 1,556 29% Fines 8 Foreitures 3 1,409 2 2% 1,409 2 6% Charges for Services 3 160 0 2% 160 0 3% Other Revenue 3 132 0 2% 132 0 2% Library Revenue 3 387 0 6% 387 0 7% Gasoline Tax 3 3,967 6 1 % 3,967 7 3% Interest Earnings 3 $ - 64,939 0 0% 100 0% $ 54,527 0 0% 100 0% Annual Recurring Costs 5 $ 19,861 41 9% $ 19,861 41 9% Police Protection 5 687 1 4% 687 1 4% Animal Control 5 3 065 6 5°k 3,065 6 5% Public Work Engineenng 5 , 509 6 13 7°~ 6,509 13 7% Public Work Maintenance 5 , 601 1 3% 601 1 3% Public Work Faralities 5 1,420 30% 1,420 30% Planning 5 332 3 7 0°h 3,332 7 0% Library Service 5 , 4 117 8 7% 4,117 8 7% Community Services 5 , 1 514 32% 1,514 32% Fve Disnd Tansfer S , 6 289 13 3 % 6,289 13 3% General Government Dared Rewmng Costs $ , 47,393 100 0°/, $ 47,393 100 0% plus Estimated Contingency cost (15% of Dvect Recurring costs) $ 7,109 $ 7,109 Total Rewrnng Costs $ 54.502 $ 54,502 Net Annual Surplus $ 10,436 $ 25 Revenue/Cost Ratio 1 19 1 00 / 1 L_~ F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCuramonga\AmowHaven V7 5 9/1/20043 PM/ i Page 1 of 1 RUN 1 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 2 -LAND USE INFORMATION AND PROPERTY TAX CALCULATIONS ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 8/27/2005 Pian Plan Type Base Pnce Total Pnce Total Valuation ~ Type Product Sq Ft Quantity Per Unit Per Unit Total Pnce Residential All Plan Types 45 x 90 2270 82 450,000 450,000 36,900,000 82 ~~ $ 36,900,000 Non-Residen4al Bmldmg A Building B Building C Building D Building E Building F Building G Building H Total Procenv Tax Basic Rate eas¢ Tax Paid City Share of Basic Tax Cary Tax Share Cary Tax Share-Rounded Residents per HH Total Residents Square Feet per Employee Totel Employees Transfer Parameters Turnover Rate Average Value Taxed Percent Assessed Valuation Amount Transfer Taz Rate Amount Amount-Rounded Building Sq Ft Assessetl Value Per Sq Ft $ 75 00 - 75 00 - 75 00 - 75 00 $ 36,900,000 1 000 $ 369,000 5 10% $ 18,815 $ 18,815 3 1500 258 250 7% 100% 36,900,000 $ 2,583,000 0 0550% $ 7,427 $ 1,421 F Gkz\LewislRanchoCucamonga\ArrowHaven V1 5 9/112004 72 23 PM Page 1 of 4 c ~~ ~-° RUN 1 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 3 -GENERAL FUND REVENUE INFORMATION ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Franchise Fees Ubliry Franchise Fees Refuse Total Franchise Fees Cable Fines 8 Foreitures Total Motor VehiGe License Charges for Semces Total RentaULeases/Sales of Fized Assets Interest Eamings Library Fund Llbmry Fines and Fees Library Rentals/Sales Intererst Eamings Gas and Tax Fund State Gas Tax Secoon 2105 Section 2706 SecGOn 2707 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Property Tax $ 2,423,180 12 50 per capita & employee $ 7,773,379 800 per capita $ 1,309,000 2773 per employee $ 889,260 18 97 per unit $ 7,057,180 545 per capita 5 45 per employee $ 8,582,310 58 52 per capita $ 120,460 0 62 per capita $ 0 62 per employee $ 98,830 $ 0 51 per capita not used $ 0 80 $ 0 70 F yl¢\Lewis\RanchoCucemongaWrrowHaven Vi 5 $ - $ 5 03 $ 318 $ 715 72 46 % of Assessed Value $ 9/1/2004 12 23 PM C ~iD ~.l 258 $ 3,228 258 $ 2,066 $ 2,066 82 $ 1,556 258 $ 1,409 $ 1,409 258 $ 15,115 258 $ 160 $ 160 258 $ 132 258 $ 207 258 181 $ 387 258 258 $ 1,299 258 821 258 1,847 $ 3,967 369,000 $ 45,977 Page 2 of 4 RUN 1 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 5 -GENERAL FUND COST INFORMATION ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Police Protection $ 15,280,650 $ 14,906.050 76 89 per capita & empl 258 30 $ Animal Control 452,250 390,490 2 66 per capita 258 30 0 $ $ Public Work Engineenng 3,201,920 1,942,240 74952 per developed acre 205 20 50 $ Public Work Maintenance 4,551,630 4,124,260 317 49 per developed acre 20 50 $ Public Work Facilities 1,903,950 380,790 29 31 per developed acre 2050 $ Planning 1,749,700 899,700 6926 per developed acre Building 8 Safety 4,142.290 - - per developed acre 20 50 2 8 30 $ $ Community Service 2,337,520 2,337,520 1594 per cepiia 5 258 30 $ Ubrary Service 1,891,680 1,891,680 12 90 Per cePiti3 30 $ Fve Disnct Transfer 1,136,770 1,136,770 5 86 per capita 8 empl 258 General Government 10,483,060 10,483,060 15 3% of tlvect line costs 41,104 19 $ 15 0% of General Fund Costs Contingency (1) Marginal allocation to new development per city fiscal impact analysis for Hentlerson Creek Estates 19,861 667 3,065 6,509 601 1,420 4,117 3,332 1,514 6,269 C F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamongaWmowHaven Vi 5 9/1/2004 12 23 PM Page 3 of 4 ~.~/~ of ~- r~ u r -~ ~~ RUN 1 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 4 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 4 -SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 Assessed Valuaaon Household Income (Q25 % of valuation) Retail Taxable Sales ((t~32% of household income) Protected Oif-Srte Taxable Sales Captured m Cary (Q50°h of valuation) Project Indvect Sales and Use Tax to CiN Sales Tax (Qt % of taxable sales) Use Tax (Q11 % of sales tax) Proposmon 172 - Ha0 Cent Sales Tax per 1,000 sales antl use tax F gkz\Lewis\RanchoCucamongaWrrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 12 23 PM !/~~}//Y/)Q $ 36,900,000 25 0% $ 9,225,000 32 0°k $ 2,952,000 500% $ 1,476,000 1 00% $ 14,760 1075% $ 1,587 $ 16,347 20 48 $ 335 Page 4 of a RUN 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 8 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 1 -FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 NO MVLF Im ad Im ad on MVLF After Percent After Percent TABLE Buildout of Total Bwidout of Total Annual Recurtina Revenues 2 $ 37,631 29 0% $ 37,631 34 5°k Property Tax 2 2,841 2 2% 2,841 2 6% Properly Transfer Tax 4 32 693 25 2% 32,693 30 0% Off-site sales and use lax 3 , 229 30 23 3% 10,076 9 2% Motor VehiGe Ucense In-Ueu , Proposrtron 172 Sales Tax 4 670 6 457 0 5% 5 0% 6,457 5 9% Franchise Fees U41ity 3 3 , 4 133 3 2% 4,133 3 8% Franchise Fees Refuse 3 , 112 3 2 4% 3,112 2 9% Franchise Fees Cable 3 , 2.817 2 2% 2,817 2 6% Fines 8 Foreitures 3 321 0 2% 321 0 3% Charges far Services 3 263 0 2°~ 263 0 2% Other Revenue 3 775 O 6% 775 0 7% Ubrary Revenue 3 7,935 6 1% 7,935 7 3°,6 Gasoline Tax 3 0 0% 0 0% Interest Earnings $ 129,877 100 0% $ 109,055 100 0% Annual Recurring Costs 5 $ 39,721 48 8°/, $ 39,721 48 8 Police Protection 5 1,374 1 7% 1,374 1 7°k Animal Control 5 3,065 3 8% 3,065 3 8% Public Work Eng~neenng 5 6,509 8 0% 6,509 8 0% Public Work Maintenance 5 601 0 7% 601 0 7% Public Work Faalmes 5 1,420 17% 1,420 17% Planning 5 6,663 8 2% 6,663 8 2% Library Sernce 5 8,233 101% 8,233 101% Community Services 5 3,027 3 7°h 3,027 3 7% Fue Disnd Transfer 5 10,804 13 3No 10,804 13 3% General Government $ 418 81 100 0% $ 81,418 100 0% Dued Rewmng Costs , plus Esumated Contingency cost (15% of Direct Rewrtmg ws[s) $ 12,213 $ 12,213 Total Rewmng Costs $ 93,630 $ 93,630 Net Annual Surplus $ 36,247 $ 15,424 Revenue/Cost Ratio 1 39 1 16 Page 1 of 1 F \Ikz\Lewis\RanchoCuwmongaV+rrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 1~PM RUN 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 8 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 2 -LAND USE INFORMATION AND PROPERTY TAX CALCULATIONS ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 8127/2005 Plan Plan Type Base Pnce Total Pnce Total Valuation ~ Type Product Sq Ft Guan4ry Per Unit Per Unlt Total Pnce Resitlentlal 164 450,000 450,000 73,800,000 All Plan Types 45 x 90 2270 169 $ 73,800,000 Building Sq Ft Non-Residential Buildng A Building B Building C Building D Building E Building F Budding G Building H Total ProoeM Tax Basic Rate Basic lax Paid Cary Share of Basic Tax City Tax Share Ciry Tax Share-Rounded Residents per HH Total Residents Square Feet per Employee Total Employees Transfer Parameters Turnover Rate Average Value Taxed Percent Assessed Valuation Amount Transfer Tax Rate Amoun[ Amount-Rounded l~ u F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamonga\ArrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 12 22 PM c~~~~ Assessed Value Per Sq Ft $ 75 00 75 00 75 00 75 00 $ 73,800,000 1 000 $ 738,000 510% $ 37,631 $ 37,631 3 1500 517 250 7Ya 100% 73,800,000 $ 5,166,000 0 0550 % $ 2.841 $ 2,841 Page 1 of 4 • RUN 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 8 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 3 -GENERAL FUND REVENUE INFORMATION ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Franchise Fees Uhhy Franchise Fees Refuse Total Franchise Fees Cable Fines 8 Foreitures Total Motor Vehicle License Charges for Services Total RentaVLeases/Sales of Fazed Assets Interest Earnings Library Fund Library Fines antl Fees Library Rentals/Sales Intererst Earnings Gas and Tax Fund State Gas Tax Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Property Tex $ 5 03 $ 318 $ 715 12 a6 % of Assessed value $ 517 $ 6,457 517 $ 4,133 $ 4,133 164 $ 3,112 517 $ 2,817 $ 2,817 517 $ 30,229 517 $ 321 $ 321 517 $ 263 $ - 517 $ 413 517 362 $ 775 517 517 $ 2,598 517 1,643 517 3,694 $ 7,935 738,000 $ 91,955 • i F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCuramonga\ArrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 12 22 PM Page 2 of 4 ~~~ acs $ 2,423,180 12 50 per capita 8 employee $ 1,173,379 800 per wprta $ 7,309,000 27 73 per employee $ 889,260 18 97 per unit $ 1,057,180 545 per capita 545 peremployee $ 8,582,310 58 52 per capita $ 120,460 062 per capita $ 0 62 per employee $ 98,830 $ 0 51 per capita not used $ 0 80 $ 0 70 RUN 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 8 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 5 -GENERAL FUND COST INFORMATION ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Police Protecbon $ 15,280,650 $14,906 050 76 89 per capita & empl 516 60 516 60 $ $ 39,721 374 1 Animal Control 452,250 390,490 2 66 per capita 20 50 $ , 065 3 Public Work Engineenng 3,201 920 1,942,240 149 52 per developetl acre 20 50 $ , 509 6 Public Work Maintenance 4,551,630 4,124 260 317 49 per developed acre 20 50 $ , 601 Public Work Facilises 1,903,950 380,790 29 31 per developetl acre 2050 $ 420 1 Planning 1,749,700 899,700 6926 per developed acre 20 50 $ , Building 8 Safety 4.142.290 - - per developed acre 516 60 $ 233 8 Community Service 2 337,520 2,337.520 1594 per capita 51660 $ , 663 6 Ubrary Service 1,891,680 770 1 136 7,891,680 136 770 1 1290 per capita 5 86 per capita 8 empl 516 60 $ , 3,027 Fire Disnct Transfer General Government , , 10,483 060 , , 10,483,060 un t t 70,613 83 $ 10,804 Costs ral F tl 15 0% of Gene ConOngency (1) Marginal allocation to new development per ary fiscal impact analysis for Hentler;on Creek Estates F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamongaWrrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004/y12 22 PM ~~J}~/ Page 3 of 4 i RUN 2 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 8 UNITS PER ACRE TABLE 4 -SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 76909 8/27/2005 Descn lion Amount Assessed Valuaaon $ 73,800,000 Household Income (@25% of valuation) 25 0% $ 78,450,000 Retail Taxable Sales (Q32% of household inwme) 32 0°/ $ 5,904,000 Protected Off-Site Taxable Sales Captured in Cary (~50%of valuaUOn) 50 0°/ $ 2,952,000 Project Indirect Sales and Use Tax to CM Sales Tax (~1 % of taxable sales) 1 00% $ 29,520 Use Tax (~11 % of sales tax) 10 75% $ 3,173 $ 32,693 Proposibon 172 • Half Cent Sales Tax per 1,000 sales and use [ax 20 48 $ 670 ~_~ F \IkzlLewis\RanchoCucamongaWrowHaven V7 5 9/1/2004 12 22 P ^ xn Page 4 of 4 o~U RUN 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL ONLY TABLE 1 -FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ARROW 8 HAVEN • TRACT 16909 TABLE NO MVLF Im d After Bwldout Percent of Total Annual Recumina Revenues 2 631 19 $ Property Tax 2 , 1,059 Property Transfer Tax Off•site sales and use tax 4 - Motor VehiGe License In•Lieu 3 ProposiUOn 172 Sales Tax 4 - Fmnchise Fees Utility 3 13,749 Franchise Fees Refuse 3 - Franchise Fees Cable 3 - Fines & Foreitures 3 5,998 683 Charges for Services 3 ONer Revenue 3 Lib2ry Revenue 3 _ Gasoline Tax 3 _ Interest Earnings 3 _ $ 41,121 Annual Reeumrna Costs 5 $ 84,579 Police Protection Animal Control 5 5 3,065 Public Work Engineering 509 6 Public Work Maintenance 5 , 601 Public Work FaaliUes 5 1 420 Planning 5 , Library Sernce 5 Community Servces 5 5 _ 6,446 Fire Disnd Transfer 5 15,701 General Government 320 $ 118 Dared Rewmng Costs , plus Estimated Contingency cost (15% of Duect Recumng costs) $ 17,746 Total Rewmng Costs $ 136,068 Net Annual Surplus $ (94'948_ Revenue/Cost Ratio 0 30 F \Ikz\Lewis\RanchoCucamongaV+rrowHaven V7 5 9/1!2004 1 21 PM ~~ 47 7% 2 6% 00% 00% 00% 33 4% 00% 00% 14 6% 17% 00% 0 0% 00% 00% 1000% Im ad on MVLF After Percent Buildout of Total $ 19,631 47 7% 1,059 26% - 00% - 00% 13,749 5,998 683 $ 41,121 33 4% 00% 0 0% 14 6% 17% 00% 00% 00% 0 0% 100 0% 715% $ 84,579 715% 00% - 00% 2 6% 3,065 2 6% 5 5% 6,509 5 5% O S% 601 O S% 12% 1,420 12% 00% - 00% 00% - 00% 54% 6,446 54% 13 3% 15,701 13 3% 100 0% $ 118,320 100 0% $ 17,748 $ 136,068 $ (94.948) 0 30 Page 1 of 1 ~~ RUN 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL ONLY TABLE 2 -LAND USE INFORMATION AND PROPERTY TAX CALCULATIONS ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 Plan Type Base Pnce Total Pnce Total Valuation ~ Plan 7 Product Sq Ft Quanaty Per Unit Per Und Totai Pnce - yp~ Residential $ Non-Residential Building Assessed Value Per Sq Ft Sq Ft 140 00 38,500,000 ORce Buildings 275,000 $ 38,500,000 Total ProoeM Tax Basic Rate Basic Tax Paid Cary Share of Basic Taz City Tax Share Ciry Tax Share-Rounded Residents per HH Total Residents Square Feet per Employee Total Empbyees Transfer Parameters Turnover Rate Average Value Taxed Percent Assessed Valuation Amount Transfer Tax Rate Amount Amount-Rounded 1 000% $ 385,000 510% $ 19,631 $ 19,631 3 1500 250 1,100 5°/ 100% 38,500,000 $ 1,925,000 0 0550 $ 1,059 $ 1,059 F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamonga\ArrowHaven V7 S 9~1f2004~20 PT+1~ ~ O Page 1 of 4 ~/ RUN 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL ONLY TABLE 3 -GENERAL FUND REVENUE INFORMATION ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Franchise Fees Utlllry Franchise Fees Refuse Total Franchise Fees Cable Fnes & Forolturos Total Motor VehiGe License Charges for Services Total RenlaVLeaseslSales of Fixed Assess Interest Eammgs Librorv Fund Library Fines antl Fees Lrbrory Rentals/Sales Intererst Earnings Gas and lax Fund State Gas Tax Secllon 2105 Secaon 2106 Sectwn 2107 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Property Tax C~ $ - $ 5 03 $ 318 $ 715 12 46°h of Assessed Value $ 1,100 $ 13,749 $ - 1,100 30,503 $ 30,503 _ $ _ $ 1,100 5,998 $ 5.998 _ $ _ 1,100 683 $ 683 $ _ $ _ $ _ _ $ 385,000 $ 47,971 F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamonga\ArrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 12 20 PM Page 2 of 4 ~/ $ 2,423,180 12 50 per capita & employee $ 1,173 379 8 00 per capita $ 1,309,000 27 73 per employee $ 889,260 18 97 per unit $ 1,057,180 545 per capita 545 per employee $ 8,582,310 58 52 per capita $ 120,460 062 per capda $ 0 62 per employee $ 98,830 $ 0 51 per capita not usetl $ 0 80 $ 0 70 RUN 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL ONLY TABLE 5 -GENERAL FUND COST INFORMATION ARROW 8 HAVEN -TRACT 16909 CITY GENERAL FUND Police Protection $ 15,280,650 $14,906,050 76 89 per capita 8 empl 1,100 00 $ Animal Control 452,250 390,490 2 66 per capita - $ Public Work Engineenng 3,207,920 1,942,240 149 52 per developetl acre 20 50 20 50 $ $ Public Work Maintenance 4,551 630 4,124,260 317 49 per developed acre 2050 $ Public WOrk Facilities 1,903,950 380,790 2931 per developed acre Planning 1,749,700 899,700 6926 per developed acre 2050 $ Building 8 Safety 4,142,290 - - per developetl acre 20 50 - $ $ Community Service 2,337,520 2,337,520 1594 per capita - $ Library Service 1,691,680 136 770 1 1,891,680 136 770 1 1290 per capita 586 per cepna8empl 1,10000 $ Fire Disnd Transfer General Government , , 10,483,060 , , 10,483,060 15 3% of direct line costs 102,61956 $ 15 0% of General Fund Costs Contingency (7) Marginal allocation to new development per ~ry Oscel impact analysis for Henderson Creek Estates F ykz\Lewis\RanchoCucamongaWrrowHaven V7 5 9/1/2004 12 20 PM ~,~~ ~ a-- 84,579 3,065 6,509 601 1,420 6,446 15,701 Page 3 of 4 s RUN 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL ONLY TABLE 4 -SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES ARROW & HAVEN -TRACT 16909 8/27/2005 $ - Assessed Valuaaon Householtl Income (Q25 % of valuation) 25 0°~ $ Retail Taxable Sales (@32% of household income) 32 0% $ - Prolectetl Off-SRe Taxable Sales Captured m City (@50% of valuation) 50 0% $ - Project Indirect Sales and Use Tax to CiN 1 00% $ - Sales Tax (~1% of taxable sales) 10 75% $ Use Tax (f~11% of sales tax) $ Proposition 172 -Half Cent Sales Tax per 1,000 sales and use tax 20 48 $ F ykzlLewis\RanchoCucamongaV+rrowHaven V1 5 9/1/2004 72 20 PM Page 4 of 4 ~~ ~3 June 15, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIUPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Joint Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 15, 2004, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California The meeting was called to order at 5 44 p m Present were Councilmembers Rex Gutierrez, Robert J Howdyshell, Dr Donald J Kurth, Diane Williams and Mayor William J Alexander Present were Planning Commissioners Richard Fletcher, Larry McNiel, Cnstine McPhail, Pam Stewart, and Chairman Rich Macias Also present were Jack Lam, City Manager, Brad Buller, City Planner, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, and Debra J Adams, City Clerk }1R1fI B COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public ,.,.., C. ITEM OF BUSINESS C1 DISCUSSION OF HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Brad Buller, City Planner, referred to a drawing on the wall that was provided by Lewis Homes and gave some background information on the Haven Overlay Distract (HOD) He indicated the City's center point was intended to be Haven and Foothill He stated Haven Avenue was referred to as the "premier street " Mr Buller also referred to information distnbuted to the Council and Commission, which is on file m the City Clerk's office Mr Buller reported the highest demand of construction in the City is for housing units He also felt a meeting of this type is productive so it can be discussed the possibility for more housing units rn the City Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is not opposed to housing as long as it is not overdone, but also felt there should be a good mixed use He also indicated he felt Haven Avenue was beginning to be the stepchild Councilmember Gutierrez asked what happens when a developer comes in and indicates they want to bwld something in a certain area Brad Buller, City Planner, advised they can test the water, and that there is a process for doing that Councilmember Gutierrez stated he hopes the applicants are encouraged and not shot down He stated the Council likes to know and cares what is going on He felt a lot of attention has been put on Foothill He stated Haven is a very interesting street with a lot going on He hoped the City will keep an open mind ~~H ~~t ~ „Dlf ~~~ 3~ Joint City Council/Planning Commisson Minutes June 15, 2004 Page 2 Commissioner McNiel stated in the early years, the Planning Commission got a reputation of being tough in its standards He felt things do not have to happen immediately, and that the City and Haven do not have to be maxed out He also indicated he did not think the mall would be a downtown area He felt the housing on Haven, if approved, should be upper class and treated like the housing around the golf course Councilmember W illiams felt the old KMART Center should be developed and did not feel housing should come right up to Haven Avenue She felt the overlay of Haven should include the original plan with office buildings along there Mayor Alexander suggested there be mixed uses along Haven and felt they should be upscale Chairman Macias stated they use the General Plan as a gwding document He stated as a group they are open to innovative planning Mayor Alexander felt the City should be open to ideas and listen to what developers are proposing Counalmember Gutierrez also felt the KMART Center should have something done to it Councdmember Kurth felt there should be a way to have it all and have it look nice and be upscale Commissioner Fletcher stated he has always thought of Haven as upscale He felt there should be a place for residents to go to work He felt there were better areas, other than Haven Avenue, for mixed uses He thought Haven should be preserved as office Commissioner McPhail stated the Planning Commission does welcome innovative designs She stated sometimes the market hinders the design that is presented to them She felt the Planning Commission should encourage the finest of design, the best of materials and innovation, and that they should not settle for less Commissioner Stewart stated she is not going to give up on Haven Avenue as office, but felt she is willing to listen to other ideas as well She expressed the City needs senior housing, and felt there could be a high-end senior protect on Haven Mayor Alexander felt the Planning Commission needs to think about low and moderate housing as well because of State mandates Addressing the Council and Commission was David Lewis, Lewis Homes, stated they have envisioned first class office faalities for Haven Avenue lust as the Council has mentioned He stated what they are proposing is to have housing next to the existing housing on the west side of their property He indicated this would be of the highest standards as they have done in the past for other protects Councilmember Kurth felt the proposed plan portrays the goals he has in mind Councilmember Williams added she did not feel any of this property should be retail A**Yf1 Councilmember Kurth left the meeting at 7 10 p m ._..._ • Commissioner Stewart suggested the whole thing needs to be master planned ~o ~ Joint Cdy Council/Planning Commission Minutes June 15, 2004 Page 3 D ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7 15 p m Sinc~rely, De ra J Ada , CMC City Clerk Approved by Planning Commission July 14, 2004 Approved by City Councl August 4, 2004 G~D 3la Lewis Investment Company A Member of the Lewis Group of Companies Memo To: Larry Henderson, City of Rancho Cucamonga Protect Planner From: John Young Date: September 21, 2004 Re: DRC2004-272 and DRC2004-273 We held a community meeting on Thursday, September 16, 2004 at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center regarding the above referenced zone change and General Plan amendment. The items of concern that were addressed at the meeting were 1 Neighbors were concerned that apartments and condos may affect properly values This included discussions on whether the buildings would be attached or detached housing and the maximum density allowed 2 Neighbors were concemed that this was the last time that they would be able to review the protect 3 One neighbor (Nacho Garcia) wanted some affordable housing to be included in the approvals 4 Termde mdigatlon -The site currently has termdes (per local residents) that could be displaced rf built on 5 Rodent mitigation -The site currently has rodents (per local residents) that could be displaced rf built on If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 909-946-7514 Thank you Imo'} 1 ~ I7/~ i l ~~11 l~l I V~~ 1156 North Mountain AvenueiPO Box 670Npland, CA 91785-0670 Direct 909-946-7514 Far 90&931-5518 email fohn youngCa~lewlsop coin G~d~ ~ • r-~ 1' ,! r n _ $ 6 ~8 C ree.K s ~ deg :..~ -. a, __ ~ -_ .~.~---~-r---__ `~ __ _.- __.- y~jq~rr0 rq, ydHas ___._.__. /aaLs .yw N~crrac,~.s a*• _~-- ___ ;~, ct-,~•~2~ Gv vrT~ 8'684 .~'~N /~ ! ~ v~ L ~~ . - _-- -~l~i-r`~G' css ~'' --__----- A~vr~ A,~A~os --- -- ~S~ sa~~~~~~ DMZ'. -- ---•--- qCr ~55Z SAnl~f~r~.,-ft, rD~2- ~c .-- ~ C U ~g CAy of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Drvs7on (908)477-2750 NcNOC~cp~~~GP oFOp ~~~`~ ENVIRONMENTAL `~ SEe' b,P~NN~NO INFORMATION FORM ~~.~~N~o (Parf I -Initial Study) (Please typ~jfnnt clearly using Ink. Use the tab key to move from one Ime to the next Ime.) • rr+;tr- T,he-Puw•pose ofMth ,project so that'th'e Guidelines; the'. Procedures to~im may review the prtiject•pursual5t to city Policies, vromances; aria xnia-Environmeritel'rQtiality Act; and: ithe;`City'-s Rules and _ _, ent CEQA. It is im'portanf that the infoi`mation'requested,in this, ~- .- ~~~' _. _ „'A,• ,~,f''' ,his, ~ ~.~~ ~ . _ _ ~~x. ,~` ~..; ~,,~,. _ Appbcabon Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains DRC 2004-00272, DRC 2004-00273 I . Protect Title THE OASIS Name 8 Address of pro/ed owner(s) Haven and Arrow Partnership, A Calrfomia Limited Partnership, do Frank Tierney Ko ' 461 S 7th Ave City of Industry, CA 91746-3119 Name & Address of developer orpro/ect sponsor Levns Investment Company PO Box 670 Upland, CA 91785 i Contact Person &Address (1) John Young Lewis Investment Company Telephone (909 94 5 PO Box 670, Upland, CA 91785, or (2) Mark Bertone, Madole & Associates, Inc ,Telephone (909) 937-9151 760-A South Rochester Avenue, Ontario, CA 91764 i Name & Address of person preparing fh,s form (r(drfferent from above) John Young, Lewis Investment Company (see address above) Mark Bertone, Madole & Associates Inc (see address above) Telephone Number John Young (909) 946-7514 Mark Bertone (909) 937-9151 IS -Rancho Cucanronga modified 091404 ~ ~Q ~ ~ Created on 9/14!2004 158 PM ~~~ i, INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note marrtls merespons,ounyw me epp„w,u,v a„~,.,c ~~.,. the applicabon Is complete et the bme of submMal, Crty stab will not be evadable to perform wodr required to provide miss(ng mformabon PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: 'i) Prowde a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project sde, and indicate the sde boundaries ' 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representabve yews into the sde from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of ~ srgnfiicant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/act Location (describe) Located on the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route ~ Bounded on the north by Arrow Route on the east by Haven Avenue on the south by 26"' Street, and on _ the west by Center Street _ 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheetdnecessary) 209-092-04 Informabon indicated by an asterisk (') rs not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff ' "5) Gross Srte Area (adsq ft ) 42.46 ac / 1,849,558 sf `6) Net Srte Area (total sde size minus area of public streets & proposed ded~cabons) 37 77 ac / 1,645,396 sf 7) Describe any proposed gene2l plan amendment or zone change whrch would aBect the protect Srte (attach addihonal sheet if necessary) The proposed residential use on the western 20 55 acres of the site requires a zonlnq change from "Industrial Park" to "Low-Medium Residential " and a general plan amendment to permit residential use. The antiapated future use of the site's eastern 17 23 acres is consistent with zoning and general plan designations and no general plan or zonlnq change is necessary for the eastern half of the site 8) Include a descnpbon o/ell permits whrch will be necessary from the Crly of Rancho Cucamonga end other governmental agencies in order fo fully implement the project tentative tract map (City) design review (City) NPDES permit (L A RWQCB) rough grading permit (City), __ public streets and sewers permit (City) private streets and sewers permit (City) grease grading _and drainage permd (City) public street improvement permd (City) bwlding permd (City) 9) Describe the physical setting of the Srte as rt exists before the protect including rnformatlon on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, matum frees, trans and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on Srte (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features descdbed In addrbon, cite all sources of rnformabon (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brobc and archeological surveys, trarirc studies) The sub/act site was previously used as a golf course prior to 1983 and is currently vacant with no existing buildings or structures There are no defined drainage courses trails or roads traversing the site, which slopes from north to south at approximately 2% The site's surface is generally level without any apparent swales or depressions where water might collect IS -Rancho Cucamonga modified 091404 ~~~ / ^n Created on 9N4Y2004 1 58 PM . The site is vegetated vnth non-natroe grasses and scattered ornamental trees, many of which appear to be dead or dying The site does not contain suitable habitat for any state or federally listed (threatened or endangered) species One state species of speaal concern (Cooper's hawk) has been observed at the site and the site is believed to have potentially sutable habitat for one other state and federal species of specialconcem (loggerhead shrike) (The above information is based on site reconnaissance and a Draft Blolgical Survey of the Haven and i i Arrow Property dated March 12 2004 provided to the applicant by Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc ) 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cde all souroes of nformabon (books, published reports and oral h~storyJ The applicant is not aware of any wltural historical or archaeological resources at the site. Groan the prior use of the site as a golf course such resources are unlikely to be present ' (Applicant consulted the Draft EIR for the City's General Plan City Planning Department's H~stonc Sdes I List and the website for the Chaffey Community Cultural Center at http /Iwww culturalcenter org ) 11) Descnbe any noise sources and theu levels that now affect the srte (atroraft, roadway nose, etc J and how they will affect proposed uses ~ Noise around fhe site is primarily generated by traffic on Haven Avenue and Arrow Route i A perimeter wall Nall mitigate traffic noise Reference should be made to the detailed Noise Impact Anal is report submitted along with this application i 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/act in detail This should provide an adequate descnpbon of the sde in terms of utbmate use that will result from the proposed pro/act Indurate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the antrapated compleLOn of each increment Attach addAronal sheet(s) d necessary The proposed protect will re-zone the westerly 20 55 net acres of the site to the LM zone designation In the future a submittal will be made for the approval of a residential development consistent with the LM zone designation with a range of dwelling units ranging from 82 to 164 (cont'd on next page) • The eastern 17 23 acres will be developed in a manner consistent wdh existing zoning and general plan designations as shown on master plan graphics submitted with this application. IS -Rancho Cucamonga rtadifiad 091404 ~~ ~ ~ ~ Createtl on 9/14/2004 1 58 PM For Informational purposes It shall be noted that along with the Initial submittal of this prolect, the included a tentative tract map for 143 lots and a design review submlttal for a detached residential _The applicant has acted to rescind the application for the tentative tract map and design review In order to achieve a design best suited for the property and surrounding neighbors The tentative tract map and desi n review will be resubmitted to the City under separate application and will not be a part of this a hcation 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including rnformabon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, efc ), intensity of land use (one-hamily, apartment houses, shops, department stores, eic) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) North of the site across Arrow Route on the west side there is a 2-story apartment complex set back approximately 25 feet from the street and on the east side along Haven Avenue, the land is vacant West _of the site across Center Street is a gated community of one- and two-story single-family homes South _of the site across 26~ Street there are single-story detached homes and asingle-story industrial park East of the site across Haven Avenue there Is an office park and vacant land 14) Will the proposed prolect change the pattem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect7 _ The future residential prolect will have a toes-medium density (4 - 8 du/ac) consistent wdh the medium high density north of the site and the low-medium and low density west and south of the site The future commercial center thrill not differ from the pattem scale or character of the surrounding area 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How wtll these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing am proposed _ Future development will enerate temporary construction noise construction will compN with all a liceble state and local noise re ulations and ordinances Reference should be made to detailed Noise Im act Anal sis submitted alon with this a Ilcations '15) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees The future development of this site will require the removal of existing trees Reference should be made to the detailed Arborist Re ort submitted alon with this a Ilcations 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domesbc water supplies) Into which the site areins The site currently surtace drains to existin street Improvements primarily on 26"' Street The prolect will ultimately drain to a proposed system in 26'" SVeet which empties Into the Deer Creek drainage system IS -Rancho Cucamonga modified 091404 C WV {~ ~ Created on 9/14Y2004 1 58 PM 660 feet west of the ro ect 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For further clanficaUon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commeraal/Ind (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolat~on tests if discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed Indreate expected dally sewage generahon (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For further clanflcaUOn, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a ResdenUal (gaUday) b CommerotaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number ofresdenUalunds 0 Detached (indicate range of parcel srzes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze Attached (mdreate whether ands are rental or for sale ands) n/a 21) AnUapated range of sale prates andror rents Sale Pnce(s) $0 00 to $0 00 Reni (per month) $ to $ 22) Specrfy number of bedrooms by and type n/a 23) Indicate anbapafed household srze by unit type nla IS -Rancho Cucamonga modified 091404 ~ ((..~ !~ ~~ Created on 9/14/2004'1 SB PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the protect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8 a Elementary _____ b Junior Hrgh c Senior High _ COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 251 Describe type of use(s) and major funcbon(s) of commercial, industrial orinstrtubonal uses The a licant antics ales that the future use of the eastem 18 29 acres of the site well be commercial, consistent with General Pian and zonin desi nations See answer to Question 12 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or rnsMuhonal uses by type To be determined 27) Indicate hours of operabon To be determined 28) Number of employees. Total Maximum Shift Time of Maxmum Shift 29) Prowde breakdown of anticipated/ob class>rcabons, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndreabon of the rate of hire far each c/assdicabon (attach additional sheet rf necessary) Plans for the future commercial use on the eastem side of the sde have not yet been developed All information COnceminq employment at the commercial development -including lob classifications, wage and salary ranges, number of employees, maximum shift, time of the maximum shill, and the number of residents to be hired at the develo merit -are to be determined 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that cumentty reside in the City `31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) Plans for the future commercial use on the eastem side of the site have not yet been developed IS -Rancho Cucamonga modified 091404 v ~ ~ ~ Geated on 9/14/2004 158 PM . ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the wafer, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ if so, please indicate them response The Cucamonga County Water Distract wdl review protect plans dunng the tentative stage and provide mfor- matron about water and sewer service The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract will review protect tans dunn the tentative staoe and provide Information about fire protection service The City of Rancho Cucamon a Engineerino Department will review protect plans dunng the tentative stage and provde information about flood control service 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCt3's, redioacbve substances, pest~crdes and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable I~quids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Ptease list the matenals and descnbe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as fhe dates of use, i(known In the known history of the site there has been no storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals. Based on the ste's use more than twenty years ago as a golf course the applicant believes~eshcides or herbicides may have been used at the site The applicant plans to undertake further investigation of the site's environmental histo 34) tMll the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-fens use, storage or discharge of hazanfous and/or toxic matenals, inGudmg but not limited to those examples I~sted above? if yes, provde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The locabon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeledon the appl~cabon plans No long term or temporary use storaoe or dischar a of hazardous and/or toxic materials isplanned for the I hereby certity that the statements iumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informabon required for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and rnformebon presented are true end correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that addibonal informabon may be required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the City of Rancho Cu Date ` D~ Signature Trfle IS -Rancho Cucamonga rtwdified 091404 ~~ ~ Created on 9/142004 ~ 58 PM ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gaUday Apt/Condo 400 al/day g Commercial/lndustriat General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gaVda lac y Neighborhood Commercial /ac t,500 aUda General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industnal Park 3,000 gaUdaylac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential 270 gaUday Single Family 200 gallday Apt/Condos Commercialllndustrial 2,000 gaUday/ac General Commercial x,000 aUda /ac Neighborhood Commercial t,500 gal/day/ac General Industnal 3,000 gaUday/ac Heavy Industnal Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 ~~ U ~ ~ Created on 9/14/2004 1 58 PM IS -Rancho Cucamonga modified 091404 ~~~-----~~~~~~ ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 IS -Rancho Cucartanga modfied 091404 ~~ ~~ Created on 9/142004 158 PM ~J City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' - INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, with a Master Plan Designation for the entire site, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue - APN 0209-092-04 Related file Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to change the zoning from Industrial Park (Subarea 6), to Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, establish a Master Plan Overlay District pursuant to RCMC 17 20 030 for the entire site, and adjust the Haven Overlay District Boundary approximately 60 feet easterly, consistent with the land use designation change, on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue - APN 0209-092-04 Related file General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lewis Investment Company 1156 North Mountain Avenue/PO Box 670 Upland CA 91785-0670 5. General Plan Designation: industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park/Haven Office Overlay District (Easterly Half of Parcel) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Existing land uses are, Residential Condominwms to the west, Apartment and vineyards to the north, Office and vacant land to the east, and vacant, industrial and single family residential to the south The site is vacant and was previously used as the "La Mancha" Golf Course that was abandoned over two decades ago 8. Lead Agency Name and Address. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 c~a ~g Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 2 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o - Fme Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Au Quality Management Distract URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Signrficant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics ()Biological Resources (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Air Qualty (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality / ()Land Use & Planning ()Population & Housing ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ) Noise ( ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) i find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared Reviewed By Date Q Date ~ ~ r~ LJ e ~d ~ • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 3 Less man significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PWenaally sigmhcant With MnigaOOn Than Sipco(cant No I act Into retetl I acl I aM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would fhe prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O O (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but ' () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site Is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue and is characterized by residential condominiums to the west, apartment and vineyards to the north, offices and vacant land to the east, and vacant, industrial and single-family residential to the south The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site Is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on the site plans, which require review for consistency with the City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Convert Pnme Farmland, Unique Farmland, or O O (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agncultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c~~ ~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 4 Less man Sgrvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g P°ta°aally Sigrvficant wrtn MNgaaon Than Sigrvficant No I ad Into tetl Impact I d c) Involve other changes in the exsting environment, O O O (/) which, due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments - a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue and is characterized by residential condominiums to the west, apartments and vineyards to the north, offices and vacant land to the east, and vacant, industrial and single-family residential to the south There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue and is characterized by residential condominiums to the west, apartments and vineyards to the north, offices and vacant land to the east, and vacant, industrial and single-family residential to the south The nearest agricultural use is north across Arrow Route from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ecf a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (/) U ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result m a cumulatively considerable net increase of O O O (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people c~ s~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 5 less Than 9piuficenf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenvally SiBn'M1wnt WM Mivgavon Than Sign,ficarlt NO I an Inco ratetl I ct 1 an Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible Tor the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. ~~~ • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g P^la^naly s,gauwm wpm Mioga9on Tnan Sgrvfcent No I act Incro atetl I as I • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCADMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted In the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~g would exceed SCADMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they. cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide Increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping ~~/~ ~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 7 Less man Slgnl(ICant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Folenbaily Sigmi¢ant wnn A4vgabon rnan Sigmhcem No 1 act Into tetl I att I et1 After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent wdh the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create signficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create sigmficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor residences to the north, west and south Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally O O O (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means u • C~ ~~d s~ LJ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 8 Less Than Sipmtlcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g Potentially Siprefcam vmn Miupatlon men Sprvficant No 1 an Inco 2tetl I I d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a/b) The protect site is located in an area developed with Residential Condominiums to the west, Apartment and vineyards to the north, Office and vacant land to the east, and vacant, industrial and single-family residential to the south The site has been previously disrupted during construction of a previous Golf Course use, infrastructure and surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, a portion of the protect site is within the Delhi Soils area of sensitive biological resources for the Delhi Sands flower loving-fly, however, studies by LSA Associates Inc have determined that, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect site does not have sensitive soil or habitat previously thought to exist and the site is surrounded primarily by urbanized land uses and is consistent wdh the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are numerous heritage trees on the protect site, and an arborist report has been prepared At this time, there is no development application, so there is no way to determine the impacts, if any, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur Aga ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 9 Less Then 9prvficant Less Issues and Su oRin Information Sources pp g Dotenhelly Signd¢ant wnn Mmpahon man Slpnifiwnt No I act Inco ratetl I act 1 as 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O U (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource° per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) However, the site has been recognized by both, the County (1975), and the City (1979), as a point of Historical Interest, as the site of the Milliken Ranch House was built in 1891 by Newell Milliken The House burned down many years ago, so the Historic Point of Interest is for information purposes only There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~~J ,J, ~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgnihcant WRh Miogauon Than Significant No Inpact Inco atetl I act 1 act c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited dunng the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect sde is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the prolect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until .the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by (construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual disking for weed abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated IL_~ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, injury, or death involving q Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as O O U (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Droision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (~) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) hquefaction~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgmhwnt Wnh MiOgation Than Significant No I act Inco tetl I ecl 1 act ro) Landshdes~ O O U (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it Is not in an Earthquake Fautt Zone, nor is tt in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hdl Fautt, passes within 1 5 miles north of the stte, and the Cucamonga Fautt Zone lies approximately 3 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0.7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 4 9 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 7.2 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unrfonn Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be Implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCADMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Cdy to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCADMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions c. ~o ~-~ ~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 12 Lesa man Sipn~nram Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenvally Signifcant wnn MNpa9on man Sipnificent No I n Inco oreted I n 1 en c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally assoaated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The prolect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types onsite consist of TvB Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist of TvB Tujunga Loamy Sand Soii assocation according to General Plan ExhibR V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a sigmficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals~ b) Create a sigmficant hazard to the public or the O O U (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the enwronment~ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed schooi~ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the enwronment~ e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the viclmty of a private airstrip, () () () (/J would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of O O U (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ G ~~ ~9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 13 ~ Than Si9nificeM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potaneally Sgndicant WHh Mmpaaon Then Sipnihcent No I act Inco rated I en ~ ecl Comments. a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergenaes Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous matenals or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergenaes Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous matenals or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticpated c) The protect site is located within 5 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anUCpated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials sde Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticpated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site Is located approximately 2 to 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is antiapated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is antiapated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes polices and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are antiapated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 r~ LJ L_J ~~~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 14 Less Than Sigmgwnt Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signifcant wrtn MiTgaaon Than SigniliceM No I act Intro reted I acl 1 act 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () () (~) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquder volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (`~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (~) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of O O O (~) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (~) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water Is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spre ding ground according to General Plan Exhibit c~ 6~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 15 Less Than Sgnd¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s~e~~roam WM IAdipauon Then Signifcent No Irtpact Into rated I 1 act IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this Increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the prolect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor tc issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary Increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant r~ I~ ~~_ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 16 Less Than S,gruficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgnificant WM ALtigation Than Signmcant No I act Into tetl I ad I aM Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 ] No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i u t) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established commundy~ O O O (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments a) The site is located on east side of Center, between Arrow and 26th Street and is characterized by Low-medium residential development to the west, high density apartments to the north, single-family and industrial to the south, industrial to the east This protect will be of similar design and size to neighboring development to the west The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated Cy0la~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 17 Less mar, Sipnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgrnficant with Miopa4on Than S,Wifitant No b) The protect site current land use designation is Industrial Park The proposed protect would be consistent upon amendment with the General Plan and does not intertere wdh any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are antiapated. c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural commundy plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within an area of sensitive biological resources (DSF) however, studies have determined the site does not contain the Delhi sods or habdat necessary to the existence of the Delhi Sands flower loving fly, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mmeral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other Land use plan Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mmeral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (~) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenaes~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (~) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (~) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (~) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels LJ ~~ 6~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 18 Leas Then Sipnihcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PMenUelly Significant WM M,t,pauon Than Sipnificent No I act Inco ratetl I act I C f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate austnp, O O O (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out A noise study was prepared (LSA, July 9, 2004) with additional study required at the time of a development proposal The Mitigations proposed in the Noise Study will mitigate for adverse traffic noise impacts and will include 1) For all residences along Center Avenue and Arrow Route, provide alr- conditioning units to allow windows to remain closed, thereby reducing noise. 2) Provide sires-standing noise wall for all residences along Arrow Route approximately 12 feet in height. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Ilne. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction ~~Q r~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEW IS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 19 Less Then Sgrvflcant Less Potentially Wrth Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~g~~tican, InMCOlgar~eted Sigmflcent N~ traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) Future Industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculatwe wdh no defwtwe users at this time The Citys Development Code regwres that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial +uses is expected However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department wtll review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools The proposed residential uses associated with this type application normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the wcindy of the protect • d) See a) response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 3 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Arport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce substantial population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • ~~~ ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 20 Less man Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenually Significant wan Mmpauon man Sipmfrtant No I act Into tetl I ael I act 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental lacil~tres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other peAormance obtectives for any of the public services ' a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protections O U O (~) c) Schools O O O (`~) d) Parks O O O (~) e) Other public faahties~ O O O (~) Comments• a) The site, located on east side of Center, between Arrow and 26th Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 2 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Substantial additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not significantly change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Old Towne Park) is located 3 miles from the protect site The protect well not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately c ~~'1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 21 Less man S,gnifirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PMenllally Significant wnn Mi4gaLOn rnan Srgn~ficant No 1 act Inro tad I I adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City ,„_ 14. RECREATION Would the prolect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational,facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Old Towne Park) is located 3 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any substantial new housing or large employment generator that would cause a significant increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONrrRAFFIC. Would the prolect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersecfions)v b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () (/) ( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O U O (/) coo ~~ i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 22 Less Than Sgrvficant Les Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paentielly si0nm~aN Wnh nvoeafion Than Sigrvficant No I act Into tetl I~acl I ad g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by, LSA Asssociates, and is attached for reference The Study determmed that because the total new trips are relatively minor, and provided the mitigation measures are implemented, the proposed Protect will have less than significant impact on traffic The protect is in an area that ~s mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be requred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards The City has established a .Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of bwlding permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Less than significant impacts are anticipated The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) The Protect shall pay the "fair share" contribution for traffic impacts estimated in a study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2) The mitigation measures specified m the TIA are hereby incorporated by reference. 3) Mitigation Measure TC-9 from the GP EIR, permitmg certain key intersects (Including Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard) to operate at level of service E or better, is hereby incorporated Into the Project. b) A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by, LSA Asssociates, and is attached for reference The Study determined that because the total new trips are relatively minor, and provided the mitigation measures are implemented, the proposed Protect will have less than significant impact on traffic The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk). along the street frontage of the site Less than significant impacts are anticipated The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Same as 15a, shown above. c) Located approximately 3 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be requred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated C~~ ~~' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 23 Less Than $IBN(ILal11 L255 PaenLelly WM Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Siomficanl eAa9an°n s~9NS°an, "° 1 as Intro rated I a I a c) Located approximately 3 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site Is offset north of the flight path and wul not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that Is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous Intersections or farming uses The protect well, therefore, not create a substantial Increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) theeefor et not crieateeanenadequate emergency ac ess r Nlo pa cs area tlcipated nd will f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an Inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design Includes, or the protect well be cbusitbays, bcycle racksfcarpool supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g , parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result In the construction of new water or O O O ('~) wastewater treatment faculties or expansion of existing faculties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () l) () (~) water drainage faculties or expansion of existing faculties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that It has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments () () (~) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () capacity to accommodate the protect's soled waste disposal needs O O (~) g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O regulations related to soled waste Comments: a) wh ch has waster~reated by he Inbland Emp ra Ut li9ies Agencytatthe RP 4 treatment plant ~ ~o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga nRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 24 Less men significant Less Issues and Supporting InformaUOn Sources Potentially Sigmfcant Wrtft MiLgebon Tien 9gmfcara No I an into oretetl I I act located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered signrficant d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated • e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually O O O (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c~ ~i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 25 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~ Then SiO~OCent Less WHh Than Na 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually O O O (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable (°Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Pian FEIR, a portion of the protect site is within the Delhi Soils area of sensitive biological resources for the Delhi Sands flower loving-fly, however, studies by LSA Associates Inc have determined that, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because the protect site does not have sensitive soil or habitat previously thought to exist and the site is surrounded primarily by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred ~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 26 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study wtll ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analysis were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) SPECIAL STUDIES The following special studies have been submitted and made part of the record of the Initial Study and are available for review at the Planning Division Offices during regular working hours 1 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, by LOR Geotechnical Group Inc ,dated March 2, 2004 2 Air Qualdy Impact Analysis, by LSA, dated July 12, 2004, and clarification letter dated August 24, 2004 3 Habitat Assessment by MBA, dated May 25, 2004 4 Surface Soil Evaluation by RMA Group, dated May 21, 2004 5 Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, by Leighton and Associates, Inc ,dated April 2, 2004 6 Noise Impact Analysis by LSA, dated July 9, 2004, and clarification letter dated August 24, 2004 . 7 Traffic Impact Analysis by LSA, dated June 11, 2004, and clarif~cat~on letter dated August 24, 2004 C~1~ X73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga nczr~nna_nm~~ - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY Page 27 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no shat environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature Date ~ Z~ Print Name and Title r~ LJ ~ ~ I~ u c~jp 'ly ISA ASSOCIATPS, WC OTeffR OFFICES FT COL' WS 20 EKECUTIVE PARK SUITE 2W 9x955306(6 TF1. BERKELEY RNERS~UE piVQJE CAI.Q~'ORMA 9261x 9495578076 FAX PP RICHMO.W ROCKLW • ~J LSA August 24, 2004 Mr John Young Lewis Operaung Corporation 1156 North Mountain Avenue P O Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Subtect Noise and Air Quality Impact Study for the Proposed Haven/Arrow Protect (DRC2004- 00272 and DRC2004-00273), m the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfomia Dear Mr Young At your request, LSA Associates, Inc (LSA) has reviewed the potentia] Horse and air quality impacts from the proposed changes to the Haven/Arrow Protect (DRC2004-00272 and DRC2004-00273) Based on our telephone conversation earlier today, rt is anticipated that the maximum number of dwelling units would change from 143 to 164, an Increase of 21 dwelling units In addition, the square footage for the proposed on-site coenmercia] uses would be reduced from 250,000 sq ft to 230,000 sq ft Based on the daily tnp generation data proveded by LSA's traffic staff (Mr Steven Green, LSA Riverside Office), these changes would result en a reduction of 28 mps a day the protect's total daily tnps (from 4,224 to 4,196) Thls is a less than one percent change in total daily tnps LSA prepared both the Norse Impact Analyses (LSA, July 9, 2004) and the Air Quality Impact Analysis (July 12, 2004) for this protect Based on the above discussion on the potential small reductton to protect daily tnps, rt is our opmton that no substantial changes would occur on the findings included m the Horse and air quality Impact analyses The findings would remain the same as identified in the above-mentioned reports Please contact me at (949) SS3-0666 if you have any questions regarding the above Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. `~~... Tung-chen Chung, Ph D Pnncipal ~~ ~~ PLAMlAO I FiS~ONMRTAL SCIENCES I DESIC.h LSA ASSOCIATES IbC IRVINE BE0.CELET L C /A IGSo SPRUCE STREET STX FLOOR 909 TRI g31L TEL PT R,CNMORD ROCCLIR J \ RIV ERSIDF Cn L1iORAlA 9~3~1 9L9 ]81 «]4 FA% FT COLLIVS SwN LU15 ORISPO August 24, 2004 John Young Lewis Operating Cotp Post Office Box 670 Upland, Caltfomia 91785-0670 Subject DRC 2004-00272 DRC 2004-00273 Dear Mr Young On Lune 11, 2004, LSA Associates, Inc (LSA) prepared a Traffic Impact Analysts (TIA) for "The Haven/Arrow Mixed-Use Project" (now called "The Oasis") The project analyzed m the TIA included an office park of approximately 250,000 square feet, as well as 143 single-family residential units It is our understanding that Lewis Operating Corp has withdra P itsg pphcation for the tentative tract map resulting in the 143 residential amts, and is now a 1 m for a zone change for the same area that would permri up to 164 single-family residential amts In addmon, the area devoted to office uses has decreased by 20,000 squaze feet, resulting in 230,000 square feet of office space The purpose of this letter is to compare the traffic impact of the currently proposed protect (164 residenhal units and 230,000 square feet of office space) to that of the previously analyzed protect The attain a eakahour, and dail0yetnppgenerationnare sh ghtly less than [hat analyzed m the T1A e SA hour, P P has prepared revised analyses of Vaffic operations for the currently proposed protect Year 2005 an year 2025 intersection level of service (LOS) tables at the study intersections included in the TIA are shown in [he attached Tables B and C, respectively Detailed LOS calculation worksheets are included m Appendix A Companson of Tables B and C with the corresponding tables m the TIA show [hat no LOS letter grades change as a result of the modifications to the project Because the changes in traffic operations resulting from the modifications to [he project are so small, the mtigation measures identified m the TIA are also sufficient for the present project The attached Tables D and E show year 2005 and year 2025 intersection levels of service after implementation of the mitigation measures included m the TIA As shown m these tables, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's LOS standard of D is maintained at all study intersections Finally, because of the slight increase m residential tnp generation and the slight decrease in office tnp generation, the project's fair share contribution to the identified mmganon measures will change slightly The attached table F shows the current project's contnbuhon towards these mmganon measures 8R4/04(R ll.E W 431 \Trafhc\Zone Change Lttter wpd) c~U ~6 ILn vNI VG Ev VIRONMENTnL SCIEACES DESIGN LSn w550 CIATCa~1~C Ifyou have any questions or require addtttonal tnfotmatton, please feel free to contact me at (951) 78]-9310 or via e-mail at Steven greene@lsa-assoc coin Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven Greene Associate Encl Table A - Project Tnp Generation Table B - Year 2005 Wdh Project Intersection Levels of Service Table C - Year 2025 Wtth Protect Intersection Levels of Servtce Table D - Year 2005 Wrth Protect Wrih Improvements Mtttgated Intersection Levels of Servtce Table E - Year 2025 Wtth Pro~ec[ Wtth Improvements Mtttgated Intersection Levels of Sernce Table F - Project Conmbution to Year 2025 Circulation Improvement Costs Appendix A -Level of Sernce Calculation Worksheets SR4/oath LLEW4311Trarficlone ChanBc Lcncnvpd) 2 C~ '~`~ LSA n150 ClAl ra IvC Table A - Protect Tnp Generation A.M. Peak Hour P n7. Peak Hour Land Use Umts In Out Total In Out Total Dady Single Family Resdenhal 164 D U Tnps/Umtt 0 19 0 56 0 75 0 65 0 36 1 Ol 9 57 Tnp Generation 31 92 123 107 59 166 1,569 Office Park 230 TSF TnpsNmtz 1 55 0 19 1 74 0 21 129 1 50 11 42 Tnp Generation 357 44 401 48 297 345 2,627 otal Tnp Generation 388 136 524 155 356 511 4,196 I Rates based on Land Use 210 -Single Family Detached Housing from Instuute of Transponation Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation , 7th Edmon 'Rates based on Land Use 750 - O[6ce Park from Institute of Transportauon Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation , 7th Edmon ?S f 1 ~_ J `~`--~,, u R'd.ER~431\Trzffic\Tnp Gen\Tnp Gen (8/242001) LSn ASSUCInTES IvC Table B -Opening Year Wttb Pro)ect Intersection Le~'els of Sen'tce AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Intersection Con[rol V/C (sec) LOS V/C (sec) LOS ] Hermosa Avenue/Arrow Route Stgnel 0 67 29 8 C 0 69 > ' 2 Center Avenue/Artow Route TWSC 254 0 F s 300 F 3 Residential Access/Artow Route TWSC 12 5 B 13 0 B 4 Office Park Access/Artow Route TWSC 12 5 B 17 4 C 5 Havrn AvenueBase Line Road Stgnal 0 64 30 0 ' C 0 74 32 6 C 6 Havrn Avenue/Foothtll Boulevard Stgnal 0 71 32 6 C 0 82 36 8 D 7 Haven Avenue/Artow Route Sgnal 0 66 29 9 C 0 84 ; 2 ~ B 8 Haven Avenue/Office Park Access TWSC 13 3 B 9 Haven Avenue/26th Street TWSC 13 9 B 14 0 B 10 Haven Avenue/6th Street Stgnal 0 65 22 1 C 0 70 22 2 C 11 Haven Avenue/4th Street Stgnal 0 73 25 1 C 0 89 33 4 C 12 Haven Avenue/1-10 WB Rams St al 0 74 18 8 B 0 56 12 2 B 1~-11 u " Exceeds level of service standard Notes For two way stop controlled mtersechons, reported delay a for worst-case approach V/C=Volume/Capacity Rauo V/C not applicable to TWSC mtersechons LOS = Level of Service TWSC =Two Way Stop Control RiLEN'411 Qra(ficU.OS120UsP (8~2a200a) ~~A ~y LSA A]SO CI ATE] It+C Table C -Year 2025 With Pro)ect Intersection Levels of Service Ahi Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Control V/C (sec) L OS V/C (sec) LOS Intersection I Hermosa Avenue/Artow Route Signal 0 63 > % 0 80 >300 F " 2 Center Avenue/Artow Route 300 TWSC F 16 5 C 3 Resdennal Access/Artow Route 12 9 TWSC B . 28 6 D 4 Ottice Park Access/Arrow Route 13 0 TWSC B C 0 89 39 7 D 5 Haven Avenue/Base Lme Road Signal 0 79 32 6 C 1 02 52 I ~ F 6 Haven Avenue/Foothtll Boulevard Signal 0 78 33 4 C 0 94 42 5 D 7 Haven AvenudArtow Route 9gnal 0 79 32 I 149 B 8 Haven AvenudOffice Park Access 151 TWSC C IS 4 C 9 Havrn Avenue/26th Street 14 8 B C 0 92 30 8 C 10 Haven Avenue/6th Street Signal 0 67 23 8 F " 1 19 95 ] F 11 Haven Avenue/4th Street Signal 1 03 52 0 C 0 66 9 6 A 12 Haven Avenue/1-10 N'B Rams St al 0 85 21 3 ' Exceeds level o(servtce standard Notes For two way stop controlled intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach V/C= Volume/Capactry Rano V/C not applicable to TWSC mtersechons LOS =Level of Service TWSC =Two Way Stop Control ~~ ~~ R GLEN 4311TatfidLOS'¢02+ P (6248004) LSA n550CILTES I4C u Table D -Year 2005 Wdh Protect ~~hth Improvements Intersection Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delav Intersection Control V/C (sec) LOS V/C (sec) LOS 1 Hermosa Avenue/Arrow Route Stgnal 0 67 29 8 C 0 69 31 3 C 2 Center Avenue/Artow Route 9gna1 0 42 9 9 A 0 46 1 3 Resdennal Access/Artow Route TWSC 12 5 B 3 0 B 4 Office Pazk Access/Artow Route TWSC 12 5 B I7 4 C 5 Haven Avenue/Base Lme Road Stgnal 0 64 30 0 C 0 74 32 6 C 6 Haven Avenue/Foothtll Boulevard Stgnal 0 71 32 6 C 0 82 36 8 D 7 Haven Avenue/Arrow Route Signal 0 66 29 9 C 0 84 8 Haven Avenue/Office Park Access TWSC 13 3 B 12 6 B 9 Haven Avenue/26th Street TWSC 13 9 B 14 0 B 0 Haven Avenue/6th Street Stgnal 0 65 22 1 C 0 70 22 2 C 1 1 Haven Avenue/4th Street Stgnal 0 73 25 1 C 0 89 33 4 C 12 Haven Avenue/1-]0 WB Rams SI al 0 74 18 8 B 0 56 12 2 B L_J Notes For two way stop controlled mtersechons, reported delay is for worst-case approach V/C =Volume/Capanry Rano V/C not applicable to TWSC mtersecnons LOS =Level of Servse TWSC =Two Way Stop Control R \LE0. a31\TrafGcU.OS\200= MIT (8Ra200a) ~ ~~ 8/ LSA ASS OCIATES IAC Table E- Year 2025 V1'tth Protect Wtth Improvements Intersection Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Control V/C (sec) LOS V/C (sec) LOS Intersection I Hermosa Avenue/Arow Route Signal 0 63 24 9 C 0 80 30 4 C 2 Center AvenuelArrow Route Signal 0 41 2 9 B 0 S9 3 Restdennal Access/Arow Route TWSC 6 5 C 4 Office Park Access/Arow Route TWSC 13 0 B 28 6 D 5 Haven Avenue/Base Lme Road Signal 0 79 32 6 C 0 89 39 7 D 6 Haven Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard Signal 0 70 32 2 C 0 94 41 6 D 7 Havrn Avenue/Arow Route Signal 0 79 32 1 C 0 94 42 5 D 8 Havrn Avenue/Office Park Access TWSC 1 S 1 C 14 9 S B C 9 Haven Avenue/26th Street TWSC Iqg g ] 4 C 10 Haven Avenue/6th Street Signal 0 67 23 8 C 0 92 30 8 I I Haven Avenue/4th Street Signal 0 93 40 7 D 0 97 47 2 D 12 Haven Avenue/1-10 WB Rams St ai 0 85 21 3 C 0 66 9 6 A Notes For two way stop controlled mtersechons, reported delay is for worst-case approach V/C= Volume/Capan[y Rauo V/C not applicable to TWSC mtersecuons LOS =Level of Service TWSC =Two Way Stop Control R \LEN+4J I\TraffinL05`d025 MIT (824/2004) ~~o ~a ' 1 L J L5. lS~OC~nTFS ILC Table F -Protect Contribution to Year 2025 Circulation Improvements Costs Total Protect Protect Improvement Fatr Share Fair Share Intersection Cost Percent Cost Center Avenue/Arrow Route $130,500 15 3% $20,014 Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard $145,730 6 5% $9,505 Haven Avenue/4th Street $256,650 5 3% $13,672 Total Off-Site Improvements $532,880 $43,191 • R 1LEw431\Trz(fictart<nal cost t8/248004) ~~ ~~ • APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION WORKSHEETS i 8/24/04(R \LEN'4? 1\Tamc\Zone Change Lener wpd) ~ ey YEAR 2005 WITH PROJECT • 824/04(R\LEW431\Tramc\Zone Change Leiter wpd) ~a ~s • Opening Year-with pro]ect-AT ue Aug 24, 2004 17 23 35 Page 2-1 Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Y ear with Pro]ect C __________________ onditions - AM __________________ ____ _____ _______ _________________ ___________ Level Of Service Computa tion Repozt 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) lfrrtf+ff rtf#rtf}rt}f f#f 11f+1111 rtf111f1f•#f#rtlrtf#rt }1f }111rt1ff11f#•#f+rtrt+ lf##f 11f+f}f Intersection #1 Hermosa Aven ue/Arrow Route ff+flrtfkrtff#}} 1f#111rtff+1 f1f11f11f1f1f#+flrt +ff+ff }ffflf+lRf+#l rtff iflff }f llf rtf Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 670 9 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 2 8 Optimal Cycle 95 Level O f Service ##f}rt C !#+rtfff ffrt lrtfl#fflf#1f+f #if###f}+#f ff#+#f+rtrtifrtfll}ff f!#fR+ff+###1f #4#lf 4ff Approach No rth Hound South Sound East Bound w est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R _______ L - T - R _______________ L I____ T _____ R ______ _____ _ ___ Control P ___________ rotected ~________ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Incl ude Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes ____I____ ___________ II_______________ _______________ I____ _____ ______ ________ Volume Module 97 163 133 131 940 92 56 660 86 147 648 62 Base Vol Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 47 163 133 131 490 92 56 660 86 147 698 62 1 00 User Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 PHF Adz lume 51 PHF V 176 145 143 479 100 61 719 94 160 706 68 o Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 51 178 145 143 479 100 61 719 99 160 706 66 PCE Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] Final Vol 51 178 145 143 479 100 61 719 94 160 706 68 Saturation Flow Module 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Sat/Lane 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 DO Adz ustment 00 1 10 0 90 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 77 0 23 1 00 1 B3 0 17 Lanes 1 Final Sat 1700 ____ 1982 1618 __________ 1700 1800 1800 ~_______________ 1700 3185 415 _______________I 1700 ____ 3286 ______ 314 _____~ _____________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sa[ 0 03 0 09 0 09 0 O8 0 27 0 06 ±+ 0 23 0 04 0 Of 09 0 21 0 21 Crit Moves '1rt" 111# 7 # 6 8 33 7 33 7 14 1 40 9 40 9 Green Time 4 5 22 8 22 8 21 4 39 7 39 Volume/Cap 0 67 0 39 0 39 0 39 0 67 0 19 0 53 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 63 0 53 Delay/Veh 67 7 33 0 33 0 34 4 27 2 19 3 49 4 29 9 29 9 97 9 22 6 22 6 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 67 7 33 0 33 0 39 4 27 2 19 3 49 4 29 9 29 9 47 9 22 6 22 6 HCM2kAvg 3 4 4 4 13 2 3 12 12 6 9 9 #f ff# +#1f.ff}ff#.rtf.#+# .#f+ff+}f.f#+1rtf#...+f##++f+ #++#f rtf+f.ff+f #.+# +#rt+ f+###rt f Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~o p~ Opening Year-with prOJect-ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 23 35 Page 3-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Y ear with Pro3ect Conditions - AM ____________________________________ __________ ____________ ________________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Unsigna lized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1f 1f1t1ff#ll fffffiif lfflfffl fffflffffff}ifRfff lf4flf 11ffflf11t t1f 1ftfflRlfififff Intersection q2 Center Avenu e/Arrow Route f ftf lffiflfff#if flfffffiffffffRf lfff#ffllfffifffff f lf*f1f }f1f}lff lffRiflftlfktfl Average Dela y (sec/veh) 20 5 Worst Case Level Of Service F[254 0] 44f tf 1ff ffffhlffi*ff fifffffff4ifM1lff fflff}f1R+4f1ff1fh ff1ff11fiffffffiffff if if if Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R __ L - T R _______________' L T R _______________I l _ I Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Contro Include include Include Include Rights ' 0 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 Volume Modul e 61 1 46 52 2 37 14 990 19 44 731 10 Base Vol 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 61 1 96 52 2 37 19 990 19 44 731 10 Initial Bse 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ada 1 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 PHF Ada 68 1 51 58 2 41 16 1050 21 49 817 11 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 68 1 51 58 2 91 16 1050 21 49 817 11 Final Vol Critical Gap Module 7 5 6 5 6 9 7 5 6 5 6 9 4 1 xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp Fo1lowUpTim 3 5 4 0 3 3 3 5 4 0 3 3 2 2 xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Mod ule 828 xxxx xxxxx 1072 xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol 1600 2018 536 1478 2023 914 Potent Cap 72 59 494 89 59 593 812 xxxx xxxxx 658 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 61 54 494 73 53 593 812 xxxx xxxxx 658 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap _ 1 13 0 02 0 10 I_______________ 0 79 0 04 0 07 _______________ 0 02 xxxx xxxx _______________I 0 07 xxxx xxxx _______________ ___________ Level Of Ser vice Module 0 2 xxxx xxxxx xx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 1 xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xx xxx xxxxx 9 5 xxxx xxxxx 9 xxxx xxxxx lO Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x B LOS by Move ' " " LT - LTR - RT ` " LT - LTR - RT A LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xxxx Shared Cap xxxx 97 xxxxx xxxx 112 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxx 8 4 xxxxx 5 6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xx xxxxx x xxxxx Shrd SGpDel xxxxx 254 xxxxx xxxxx 132 xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxx f f Shared LOS F ` " f F ApproachDel 254 0 132 3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS F F Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~~ ~7 I~ LJ Opening Year-with project-ATUe Aug 24, 2009 17 23 35 Page 9-1 __________________________________Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year Wrth Protect Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Servrce Computatron Report 2000 HCM Unsrgnalrzed Method (Base Volume Alternative) 11#111 1rtff1f 1f 1!111!!•#rt1111!!11#1l 11rt11f#rt11ff1f1f 1!11!1#a#11+#11f11f11faa11f+1 Intersec[ron $3 Resrdentral Access/Arrow Route lfrt1f 1f 11111111##1f 1f11krt1f11f###1f1frt 1f lilt11111!##1111#kf111frt#11111 1f 1111! 111 Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 2 Worst Case Level Of Servrce B[ 12 5) •1##rtif#kff#f#1f 1krtf11ff1t1f1111##f#itilf##11ff#if if irtf f!!#111t#iflffflf111rtkfff Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I_______________II_____________________________________________ Control Stop Srgr Stop Srgn Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rrghts Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 D 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 ____________I_______________II______________________________~_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1038 8 0 785 0 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtral Bse 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1038 8 0 785 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Volume 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1038 8 0 785 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frnal Vol 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1038 8 0 785 0 ___________________________I~_______________II_______________I_______________ Crrtrcal Gap Module Crrtrcal Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTrm xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx %XXKX xxxx X ____________~_______________I______________________________~_______________ Capacr[y Module Cnf lrct Vol xxxx xxxx 523 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ~X xxxx ~~ Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 504 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXX XXX~XX Move Cap xxxx xxxx 509 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx %XXXX x~ocx xx~oc X Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx %XXX XXXX x~cxx ____________I____________________________________________________________ Level Of Servrce Module Queue xxxxx xxxx 0 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 12 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX ~oocx ~~ LOS by Move ' ' B rt " ` ` Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xx~cx x~cxx x~oocx ~oocx ~X ~'~ SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX~ xx~cx xxx~cx ~cxxrzx xx~oc xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x~cxrzx xxrzx X X xxecx x~oc *cx Shared LOS rt 1 # # ` # ApproachDel 12 5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xx~cxrzx ApproachL05 B f Traffrx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowlrng Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA C~'~ S8 Opening Year-with pro3ect-ATUe Aug 24, 2009 17 23 35 Page Sil ________________________________________ ___ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year Wzth Project Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Repozt 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 11111*f1+*f1f++1f1r*1++f++++#11111+*++f1+111111+++*11#1111#111+1l11l1+f++11111+f IntezsecCion #4 Commercial Access/Arrow Route 11+111+f+#1114+1114+1111411f*ff141*f+f++*11ff**R4+*1f+11111f11f1fiff14*+*f11f 111 Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 2 Worst Case Level Of Service B[ 12 5] +ff111f11fff+1*111+1111111111+*++*ffflffflf*ffffl#f 111}1f 1f 11R*1f *t11f1f f~f It+R+f Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Hound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T'- R L - T - R ____ ________ ______________ ______________ Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 ____________I______________________________I______________________________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 967 68 0 809 0 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 967 68 0 809 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Volume 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 967 68 0 809 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 967 68 0 809 0 ___________________________I_______________I______________________________I Critical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FoilowUpTzm xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx __________________________________________II_______________I_______________ Capacity Module Cnf lzct vol xxxx xxxx 518 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 508 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx 508 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 OS xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ___________________________I_______________I______________________________I Level Of Service Module 4ueue xxxxx xxxx o 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 12 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * 1 B * + + + + Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxx-ti xxxx ~cxx~cx xxxxx xxxx ~cxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx4cx xxxx xxx'cx Shared LOS f 1 1 * + f * f f ApproachDel 12 5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS B 1 + Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA Cyan gq Opening Year-with pro3ect-ATUe Aug 29, 2009 17 23 35 Page 6-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year with Pro]ecC Conditions - AM _______________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) fikl#1f*f#fk*f*#llffif*##ff*1#f1f*#ff4#f11*fffkf4#*f ##f 11!11!#1f*##f1#*flfftR lRf Intersectron #5 Haven Avenue/Baselrne Road fff*ff11#1f#flff##f1**#f1f#1*fliff##fflf#ff*#11ff11f 1iffl}##IfRf 1f #f IR#fR*f#11ff Cycle (sec) 100 Critrcal Vol /Cap (X) 0 638 Loss Trme (sec) 8 (YaR = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 30`C Optimal Cycle 42 Level Of Service f1*k 11R#*#f##f##*i#f 1f1i#1f *41111 #f if*#1f*fff*#*#fff#f 41#!1#!!4*#*f*##ff *f 1#ffk Approach North Hound South Bound Ease Bound west Hound Movement L - - T - R L - T - R L T R - T R L _____I_______________I__________ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Include Include Include Include Rights Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ____________I_______________I_____________________________________________ Volume Module Hase Vol 86 527 82 137 1198 141 169 399 183 200 602 194 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 86 527 B2 137 1198 191 169 399 183 200 602 194 User Ada 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adl 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 PHF Volume 93 571 89 148 1298 153 183 432 198 217 652 210 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 93 571 89 148 1298 153 183 432 198 217 652 210 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 93 571 89 148 1298 153 183 432 198 217 652 210 ____________I_______________I_______________I_______________I_______________ Saturaeion Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Ad3ustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 68 0 32 1 00 2 00 1 00 1 00 2 00 1 00 Final Sat 3200 5900 1800 3200 4831 569 1700 3600 1800 1700 3600 1800 Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 03 0 11 0 OS 0 OS 0 27 0 27 0 11 0 12 0 11 0 13 0#*8 0 12 Crit Moves *"** *.1. 1811 Green Time 4 6 32 5 32 5 19 2 42 1 92 1 16 9 22 0 22 0 23 3 28 4 28 4 Volume/Cap 0 64 0 33 0 15 0 33 0 69 0 64 0 69 0 55 0 50 0 55 0 69 0 91 Delay/Veh 55 9 25 6 29 1 39 0 23 5 23 5 43 4 35 4 35 2 35 3 32 6 29 6 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad3De1/Veh 55 9 25 6 29 1 39 0 23 5 23 5 93 4 35 4 35 2 35 3 32 6 29 6 HCM2kAVg 3 4 2 2 12 12 6 6 6 6 10 5 *f1*1*f1*+#f*f#+#111#111#111*#*111##f**#rf1+#x*+#1xr1*#w1**+w*##x*#f1*#rx11*#f#1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c~D 9d Opera ng Year-with pro]ect-ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 23 35 Page 7=1 Haven/Arrow Cary of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Y ___________ ear with Pro? ect Conditions - AM ___________________________________ _____ _________ ___ ____________ _____ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) • flff•11f1fff flf•lfafflfffrff ffflflfflfffflffff ff++f++1f 11ffffflffaff fafffffff fff Intersection #6 Haven Avenue /Foothill Boulevar d ff..fffff.fl fflf••fffffffflf lflffffffffffffaff lff lfflfffflf+fflfflff lffflff if +ff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 709 Loss Time (s ec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 32`3 Optimal Cycl e 49 Level O f Service C f lf• ff•lfffffff fflr••flflfffff• fflfflflfff11ff1f1 fffff+fffffffffffffflf lfffllff Approach North Bound South Hound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R _____ _ L - T - R _______________ L ____ - T - _________ R __ ____________ Control _______________ Protected _ I~________ Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 Lanes _ _______________ _______________ _______________I ____ _________ __I ___________ Volume Module Base Vol 220 567 109 236 1353 107 233 510 187 351 569 95 Growth Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtial Bse 220 567 104 236 1353 107 233 510 187 351 569 95 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad] 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 PHF Volume 230 599 109 247 1417 112 299 534 196 368 596 99 . Reduct Vol 0 0 0 230 594 109 0 0 0 247 1417 112 0 0 0 244 534 196 0 368 0 596 0 99 Reduced Vol PCE Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 230 594 109 247 1417 112 249 534 196 368 596 99 Saturation Fl Sat/Lane ow Module 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 18 00 Ad]ustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 2 00 3 38 0 62 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 1 96 0 54 2 00 3 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3200 6089 1116 ______________ 3200 5400 1800 I_______________I 3200 2634 966 _______________II 3200 ____ 5900 18 _________ 00 __I ____________~ Capacity Anal _ ysis Module Vol/Sat 0 07 0 10 0 10 0 08 0 26 0 06 0 OB 0 20 0 20 1111 0 11 .fff 0 11 0 06 Crit Moves 111' 10 2 26 3 26 3 lfff 20 8 37 0 37 0 18 3 28 6 28 6 16 2 26 5 26 5 Green Time 0 71 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 71 0 17 0 92 0 71 0 71 0 71 0 42 0 21 Volume/Cap Delay/Veh 50 5 30 2 30 2 39 3 28 1 21 3 36 6 34 3 34 3 44 2 30 6 28 8 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 50 5 30 2 30 2 34 3 28 1 21 3 36 6 34 3 39 3 94 2 30 6 28 B HCM2kAvg 5 5 5 9 13 2 4 11 11 7 5 2 fifffflffif if f1f41fflflffffff lflfhf!lfflflRf+14 11+411l4!!!l4fiRf ff'Yf lflffiflf fff Traffix 7 6 0715 Ic) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~ip 9/ n LJ Opening Year-with prof ect-ATUe Aug 24, 2009 17 23 35 Page 8=1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year With Prolec[ Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) wlff lr llfrl+ffw1+1f 111aflfrr+rlfflrlfalflstew lffffrlf1fw11f 111fff•r1111f111rlfaw Intersection {j7 Haven Avenue/Arrow ROUte •1111rfflrfflfflfflff+affflflffflffl11f1ff11kf1#f af44f+r 1f awf 1!!!114!! l+lf wfR lff Cycle (sec) 100 Cn tical Vol /Cap (X) 0 656 Loss Time (sec) 8 IY*R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 29 9 Optimal Cycle 43 Level Of Service C w•f lllaf+flwf lira!afrfafflllrrff11r11f1fllffllr++frla off~f 111!1! lafflr+aaaf •ff1+ Approach North Bound South Hound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R __ _____I_______________I_______________ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 __________________________________________II_______________I_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 241 933 191 196 1187 113 219 597 175 205 595 55 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 291 933 191 146 1187 113 219 597 175 205 595 55 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adl 0 99 0 99 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 PHF Volume 257 997 204 156 1268 121 234 638 187 219 636 59 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 257 997 204 156 1268 121 234 638 187 219 636 59 PCE AdJ 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 257 997 204 156 1268 121 234 638 187 219 636 59 ___________________________I______________________________I_______________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adz ustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 B9 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 74 0 26 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 1 83 0 17 Final Sa[ 3200 5900 1800 3200 4931 969 3200 3600 1800 3200 3295 305 ___________________________II_______________II_______________~I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 08 0 18 0 11 0 OS 0 26 0 26 0 07 0 18 0 10 0 07 0 19 0 19 frla rfff +f rf Crit Moves 11+f Green Time 12 3 90 7 90 7 10 8 39 2 39 2 11 1 29 2 29 2 11 3 29 9 29 4 Volume/Cap 0 66 0 45 0 28 0 45 0 66 0 66 0 66 0 61 0 36 0 61 0 66 0 66 Delay/Veh 95 9 21 7 20 0 92 8 25 6 25 6 97 0 31 4 28 3 95 2 32 4 32 4 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adz Del/veh 45 9 21 7 20 0 42 B 25 6 25 6 47 0 31 4 28 3 45 2 32 4 32 4 HCM2kAvg 5 B 9 3 12 12 5 9 5 4 10 10 rlr+afflraf•f1f•flaff+lfffrfr++11+r1+ffffr+alf+laa•rf lffrfff+ffrlf++f +11111!!1!! Traffix 7 6 0715 Ic) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • c~0 9a • Opening Year-with pro3ect-ATUe Aug 29, 2004 17 23 35 Page 9-1 _________________________________________________ ____ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Open.ng Year With Pro3ect Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Me[hod (Base Volume Alternative) ».~~+•i~i~i~t~»>r•••~~ya~~~~~M~~~~i~~~i~~tr.~r:~~i~~akii ~~x~ssr~r~~y~~~~~~t•:»+ Intersection $8 Haven Avenue/Cortunercial Access Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 0 Worst Case Level Of Service B[ 13 3] Approach North Bound South Hound East Hound West Bound MovemenC L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________I_____________________________________________I Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ____________I_______________~~______________________________~_______________I Volume Module Hase Vol 0 1362 0 0 1486 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 1362 0 0 1486 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adl 1 00 I 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Volume 0 1362 0 0 1486 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 1362 0 0 1486 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 _______ ______________________I_______________ ____________I_____ __I ________ Critical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx~cxrz x7c~cx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTrm xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ________________________________________________________________________I Capacity Module Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxti xxxx xxxxx x~ooc 7nc:cx 606 xxxx x.`cxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx Xxxx Xxxxx xxxx JC.X.)(% XXXXX ~~ 7cxxx 445 xrzxx xXxx xxxxX Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x~cxx 945 x~sxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx7c 0 02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ___________________________~_______________I_______________~_______________~ Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXX'~ x~cxxx ~"~ 13 3 7cxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move ' ' ' ' ' B t ~ Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX x7cx~c ~~ ~~ xx~cx rz~ocx X Shared4veue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx:oc:c xxxxx xrzxx 7c~c7cx '~X x~ocx ~~ Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX ~`~ ~~ xxxxx xxxx ~~ Shared LOS ' ' ' ~ ~ AppzoachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 13 3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS ' ' B Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc L>censed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ c~p 93 n LJ Opening Year-with pro]ect-ATUe Aug 29, 2004 17 23 35 _____________________________________ Pagz 10-1 ___ ______________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year with Project Conditions - AM ___________________________________ ________________ _____________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1111!1!11! 1ff 11!11!! 111ffff.•f1f11111111f1111!!1!!11! 11f1fff111ff11ff 1ff 1111! 111 Intersection q9 Haven Avenue/26th Street f11f11Iff#111!!!1111111111111l1f lff lflt lfff#lff if 1ff1111t11fIYf1111f11111l Yff Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 2 Worst Case Level Of Service B[ 13 9] 1111ff1t1f 1 1 f11f11R11111f1fff 1111f1f1ff1ffiflfffflff#1f111f11fk 1111f111t11 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I_______________~ L T R _______________ ___ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Include include 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes __________________II_______________I_______________I _______________ _________ Volume Module 0 1628 0 0 1996 83 0 0 54 0 0 0 Base Vol Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Hse 0 1628 0 0 1496 83 0 0 54 0 0 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 PHF Volume 0 1756 0 0 1619 90 0 0 58 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 1756 0 0 1614 90 0 0 58 _______________~_______________~ 0 _______________I Critical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 x ___________________________I_______________I_______________I xxxx xxxx xxxxx _______________~ Capacity Module Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 583 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 461 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 961 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 13 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 13 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move f 1 ` f ` B LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx cx xxx cx xxxx xx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx*cx xxx+cx x 1 - ' # Shared LOS f ` " ' ' 1 ApproachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 13 9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS " f B Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~y4p 9u • Opening Year-with prol ect-ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 23 36 Page 11-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Y ______ ear With Project Conditions - AM ___________________________________ _____ ____________ _________________ _____ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) #1f1f+1f}411+111f ++1ff+11+fl ffllf ll111ff1fx1f1 fxxlf if +Iflff1R11 fff+1 11ff+f 111 1ff Intersection tt10 Haven Avenu e/6th Street kflflflflf+1+f11! }+f+ff11f+1 111R 111+f +f+ff++11 11!11 +fiff+lfffxf llf++ f}1f 1f 111 1ff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 646 Loss Time (sec) 6 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 22.1 Optimal Cycle 37 Level O f Service C .1111!x11!!.!1++f +11!1.!1.1x 111111.1.fff.lff.f xff..xf.ffllff..l +x+ff l.++f .f.f+.+ Approach No rth Bound South Hound East Bound w est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ________I L - T - R _______________I L ____ - T - R ___________ ____ ______________ Control I Protected I_______ Protected Permitted Permitted Rights Include Include Include include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 i~ 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Lanes __I____ ___________ II_______________ ~_______________ ____ ___________~ __________ Volume Module Base Vol 123 1583 82 139 1212 97 93 189 71 119 206 43 Growth Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtial Bse 123 1983 82 139 1212 47 93 189 71 114 206 43 User Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad) 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 PHF Volume 136 1755 91 154 1349 52 103 210 79 126 228 48 Reduct Vol 0 Reduced Vol 136 0 0 1755 91 0 0 0 154 1349 52 0 0 0 103 210 79 0 126 0 0 228 98 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 136 _____ 1755 91 __________I 154 1344 52 I_______________II 103 210 79 _______________ 126 __-_ 228 98 ___________ ____________I Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Ada ustment 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 2 85 0 15 2 00 2 89 0 11 0 26 0 59 0 20 1 00 1 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 1700 ____ 5134 266 __________I 3200 5198 202 I_______________II 974 964 362 _______________II 1700 ____ 1800 1800 ___________I _____________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OB 0 34 0 34 0 OS 0 26 0 26 0 22 0 22 0 22 0 07 0 13 0 03 Crit Moves ff•f **•• 1f.f Green Time 19 3 52 9 52 9 7 6 46 1 96 1 33 6 33 6 33 6 33 6 33 6 33 6 Volume/Cap 0 56 0 65 0 65 0 65 0 56 0 56 0 65 0 65 0 65 0 22 0 38 0 08 Delay/Veh 92 9 17 9 17 4 51 0 19 9 19 9 30 6 30 6 30 6 24 0 25 6 22 7 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad7De1/Veh 42 9 17 4 17 9 51 0 19 9 19 9 30 6 30 6 30 6 24 0 25 6 22 7 HCM2kAvg 5 14 14 4 11 11 11 11 11 3 5 1 +ff++lf+f11x11fx+1 1fxlx+flfx+ xx+fxx+alwwxalfxlx afflx+fffxx++flxx +xllxf++ff if l+++ Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c~ 9S Opening Year-with pro? ect-ATUe Aug 24, 2009 17 23 35 Page 12-1 • Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year with Project Conditions - AM ___________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) fYfti'Mf1R#ifRlf Rf111!1iittffflflktltRff#lttittfflfttRffflfffffffif Rif ifltk}ltfif Intersection #11 Haven Avenue/4th Street 1!111!+1!111! iRf++ff iffw lff+tfRiff•fffR1R111ffti1tflfRfRlitfft1f 1!1!110!72611! of Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 25`1 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y.R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) C Optimal Cycle 52 Level Of Service fif1181!!!if11ft11tiff}ifif11tf1tk1t4411fRRf fifltlRllfif1t1f11fR1t4}1111! tfltiff North Bound South Hound East Bound West Bound Approach _ _ _ Movement L - T - R L - T - R L T R L T R __~_______________I_______________ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Include Include Include Include MinhtGreen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ____________I_______________I_______________~_______________I_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 141 1799 212 62 1251 52 89 223 196 184 394 190 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 141 1799 212 62 1251 52 89 223 146 189 394 140 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0 89 • PHF Volume 159 1970 239 70 1409 59 95 251 169 207 494 158 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 159 1970 239 70 1409 59 95 251 164 207 494 158 PCE Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 159 1970 239 70 1409 59 95 251 164 207 944 1581 ____________'_______________I_____________________________________________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 B9 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 2 68 0 32 2 00 2 88 0 12 1 00 1 21 0 79 1 00 1 48 0 52 Final Sat 3200 4816 584 3200 5189 216 1700 2176 1424 1700 2656 994 __________________________________________I______________________________I Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 41 0 91 0 02 0 27 0 27 0 06 Of:* 0 12 OR~1* 0 17 0 17 Crit Moves *i1R fief Green Time 9 2 56 3 56 3 3 0 50 2 50 2 8 2 15 9 15 9 16 B 24 5 24 5 Volume/Cap 0 54 0 73 0 73 0 73 0 54 0 59 0 68 0 73 0 73 0 73 0 68 0 68 Delay/Veh 45 5 17 0 17 0 72 1 17 3 17 3 57 6 99 6 44 6 98 4 36 4 36 4 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adz Del/Veh 4535 1180 1180 7221 1103 1103 5746 9486 4486 4889 3694 3104 HCM2kAvg 1111Rf4fii4fiRRfRRiiiifRiitf iffifRi4RRt1RYTRiRRRfR1RRRf if1R#tiRlRfff Rffif 1111181 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~p 9G Opening Year-with project-ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 23 35 Page 13-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Y __ ear With Project Conditions - AM ____________________________________ _____ ___________ _________________ ________ _ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) **}f1*ffif*4+**#+ 1f#++#ff1+* ff***kif 11k111f*## Yf*+flflfff**f111f*}#11 1*#kf *f#k}f Intersection #12 Haven Avenu e/I-10 Westbound R amps 11++1111111++*#++ ..1.+111+#* 11+11!11111!1111+f +1*f.11++...1.1111*+.11 11##1111.!1 Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 741 Loss Time (sec) 9 (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 18"-8 Optimal Cycle 90 Level O f Service B !1 1111+1+111+1111 *a11+++f 111 #!1111##f #1+##111+ +ff1#a11 +f #111#+#1111+1 1111+1111 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ____________ L - T - R _______________ L - I_____ T - R __________I _____I____ Control ___________ Permitted I___ Permitted Split Phase Spl it Phase Rights Ignore include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Lanes ____ ___________ '_______________ _______________ _____ __________I ____________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 2554 289 0 1405 468 0 0 0 456 0 892 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 2554 289 0 1405 468 0 0 0 456 0 892 1 00 r Ad Us 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z e 0 88 PHF Ad 0 BB 0 00 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 88 z pHF Volume 0 2916 0 0 1604 534 0 0 0 521 0 1018 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 2916 0 0 0 0 0 1609 539 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 521 0 0 0 1018 Reduced Vol 1 00 PCE Ad 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 a 1 00 MLF Ad 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z Final Vol 0 2916 0 0 1609 539 0 0 0 521 0 1018 Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 0 94 0 00 4 00 1 00 0 00 3 75 1 25 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 00 0 00 2 00 Lanes Final Sat 0 ____ 7200 1800 __________ 0 6751 2249 I_______________ 0 0 0 I_______________~ 1700 _____ 0 3900 __________ _____________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 00 0 40 0 00 0 00 0 24 0 24 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 31 111+ 0 00 0 30 Crit Moves 111' 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 3 0 0 41 3 Green Time 0 0 59 7 0 0 0 0 59 7 54 Volume/Cap 0 00 0 79 0 00 0 00 0 93 0 93 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 74 0 00 0 72 Delay/Veh 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 13 5 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 26 5 User DelAd3 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 AdjDel/Veh 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 13 S 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 26 5 HCM2kAvg 0 16 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 15 0 14 #f1*f1+1#*14*1#1** #1111#+1}1* *411R###Y11##1*1+f #1*#11k#i#RR#+#11 11*++ #111+##f 1*+ Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RZYERSZDE, CA • C D 9'~ Opening Year-with pro]ect-PTue Aug 24, 2009 17 24 40 Page 2-1 • ____________________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year With Pro]ect Conditions - PM ______________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) #1tf++i+f*#f#f##f#Iff*f#Iff lfflflf#+fllfff#t+4f*f*+#+f+**f 1}+4111ffitt##tk11fl1f Intersection #1 Hermosa Avenue/Arrow Route ffffff+fff+f##++fffff+l+fff+***f+llfff**1f+1ff*f+fffff#1f*+a #f+f+++•#f 0!690!!#f* Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 8 (Y*R = 4 sec) Avezage Delay (sec/veh) 31 3 Loss Time (sec) C Optimal Cycle 47 Level Of Service •*fff#+fff+fff*f++f•#f*ff#+}f*f+#+f+fff#f+f1f*f**f *f+##+f}.*f#11f+f+r*f+#*ff+f Approach North Bound South Bound East Hound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L T R L T R --- -~ Protected Protected Control Protected Protected Include Rights Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module Base Vol 121 464 173 119 224 54 144 875 80 128 839 125 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 121 464 173 119 224 54 144 875 80 128 839 125 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ad] PHF Ad] 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 99 0 94 0 99 0 94 PHF Volume 128 992 1B3 126 237 57 153 927 B5 136 889 132 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 128 492 183 126 237 57 153 927 85 136 889 132 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 128 492 183 126 237 57 153 927 85 136 889 132 Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1600 1800 Ad]ustment 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 Lanes 1 00 1 96 0 59 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 83 0 17 1.00 1 74 0 26 Final Sat 1700 2622 978 1700 1800 1800 1700 3298 302 1700 3133 467 Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OB 0 19 0 19 0 07 0 13 0 03 0 09 0 28 0 28 0 OB Of;B 0 28 ##ff ff#* *f*f Crit Moves Green Time 0355 0769 0769 0069 0455 0413 0369 0267 0267 0260 0169 0169 Volume/Cap Delay/Veh 42 9 39 8 34 8 53 7 34 6 29 9 50 S 24 9 24 4 50 3 25 6 25 6 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 42 9 34 H 39 8 53 7 3476 2919 5065 2134 2139 5053 2196 2146 HCM2kAvg 4 10 10 5 f+IffflRf*1f#**#f+f#*#1f*1f ##fff}1f+*#*4ff*f+#*f#1f }f11f*#1f}f**if lflf*1f*f#kf*# Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~U 98 Opening Year-with project-PTue Aug 24, 2009 17 24 40 Page 3=1 Hagen/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye _ ar With Project C __________________ onditions - PM __________________ __ ____________ _______________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Unsigna lized Method (Base Volume Alternative) +i+z•w~~~~t+ ~~*•i~•R~••ty•a• i~~~~~~~~•:•:~iar~ na~i.i~~R~~+~~a ~~t+,•+r.~ ~Rt»~~~~~+ Intersection #2 Center Avenu z.:.ii.+. e/Arrow Route ....::...t..+.:.~: ~.~:~.::..~.:,..:....... ..:~:....... ..k..:.,~: ~..+... F[726 7] e Dela Av ra y (sec/veh) 36 8 Worst Case Level Of Service .. g e w...... .:.........:...: ..,.......::...... ...~.+...~::.....:.~... .....t:.. .r.~.. Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound we st Sound R Movement L - T - R L - T - R _______ L T R '_______________I L _____ T __________ ____________ l ___ I____________ Stop Sign ~________ SCOp Sign Uncontrolled Unc ontrolled Contro Include Include Include Include Rights 0 ' 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes __ 0 0 0 1 ~_______________ _______________ '_______________ I_____ __________ __________ Volume Modul e 36 33 0 18 90 1049 53 109 1053 41 Base Vol 66 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adl 1 00 1 00 1 18 90 1049 53 109 1053 41 Initial Bse 66 0 36 33 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ada 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 PHF Adz 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 0 18 91 1069 59 111 1073 42 PHF Volume 67 0 37 34 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 91 1069 54 111 1073 42 ' Final Vol 67 0 37 34 __I I_______________I _____ __________ Critical Gap Module 6 9 H 7 8 xxxx 6 9 9 1 xxxx xxxxx q 1 xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp xxxx 7 2 2 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim ____ 3 5 xxxx 3 3 I_______________ 3 5 xxxx 3 3 I_______________ 2 2 xxxx xxxxx I_______________I _____ __________ ________ Capacity Mod ule 562 1933 xxxx 558 1115 xxxx xxxxx 1123 xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol 1937 xxxx x 629 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap 40 xxxx 476 41 xxxx 479 634 xxxx xxxx x 629 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 32 xxxx 476 31 xxxx 979 634 xxxx xxxx 0 18 xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap 2 10 xxxx 0 08 _______________ 1 09 xxxx 0 04 I_______________ 0 06 xxxx xxxx I_______________ _____ __________ ____________ Level Of Serv ice Module 6 xxxx xx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 2 xxxx xxxxx 0 xxxx x Queue xxxxx xxxx xxx x xxxx xxx 1 xxxX xxxxx 11 11 9 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * xxxxx 8 LOS by Move ' LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 8 LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx 98 xxxxx xxxx 96 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 10 7 xxxxx xxxxx 4 8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx x x xxxx x Shrd StpDel xxxxx 727 xxxxx xxxxx 312 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx - ~ Shared LOS ` F ` ' F xx cx xx ApproachDel 726 7 312 5 xxx~cx e ApproachLOS F F Trafflx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~¢p 99 Opening Year-with project-PTue Aug 29, 2004 17 24 90 Page 4-1 ______________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year With Pro)ec[ Conditions - PM ___________________________________ _____________________________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Uns3gnalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) frf if a+f11111}11111}1!#11#rflf}1f•111f1f11r11} 1f1#1111 111111#111 1f#f#111}ff11f1r Intersection #3 Residential Access/Arrow Route 11arf11ff}1# flf if rfffatlfff• f#}1f 1##1111111 1f rlf #1111111111}}flflfflff#111 1}1fff B[ 13 0] e Delay (sec/veh) 0 1 Worst Case A Level Of Service 1 111 ~ verag aliffaffffl}11111tff#1lflffflr}f}ffllffRfRff1# af f 11111 lkff 1111}f}f }ff 111111 1 Approach North Hound South Sound East Bound west Bound T R Movement L - T - R L - T - R ____ __ L T R I_______________I L _ 9 _____ ________I______P_ _______ ncrol Stop Sign Sto Si n C Uncontrolled Uncontrolled o Include Include Include Include Rights 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Lanes 0 ___~_______________I_______________ I_______________I _______________I _________ Volume Module 0 0 0 0 1117 27 0 1203 0 Base Vol 0 0 16 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 6 0 0 0 0 1117 27 0 1203 0 Initial Bse 0 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ad) 1 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 16 0 0 0 0 1117 27 ~ 0 1203 0 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 1117 27 0 1203 0 Final Vol 0 0 16 ___________I_______________ _ Critical GaplMOdule x x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ____I______________________________ xxxxx xxxx xx I_______________ I_______________ ________ Capacity Module x xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lic[ Vol xxxx xxxx 572 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx xx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 468 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx xx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx 468 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxex 0 03 xxxx xxxx xxxx ________________I_______________ xxxx xxxx I_______________ I_______________I ___________ Level Of Service Module xx xxxx 0 1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxx xxx~cx `x cx xxx xxxcx xx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 13 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx e * LOS by Move } f H LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movemene xx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xx x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxx x x xxxx xxx cx ~cxx x~cxx~c xx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx*x R i xxxex f - ~ f f Shared LOS } xxxxxx ApproachDel 13 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS B Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~p ~a~ Opening Year-with project-PTue Aug 29, 2009 17 24 40 Page 5-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year with Project C _____________________ onditions - PM __ __________________ __ Level Of Service Computa tion Repcrt 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) fitlflf;ffiffi}#1f4f##Yf11f;f;ifflfff+f11f11f# ;fif##f#1f}ff+f+4 #llfaffil}1f#klfi Intersection #4 Commercial Access/Arrow Rovte f+ffflfflfff+fif}f if if+lf+fiif11+!11!;+f+ffif# #+;1fi+1f#f;;#1 r+ffff;;+ff#11;;111 Average Delay (sec/veh) 1 2 Worst Case Level Of Service C[ 17 4] ff;#;fi}f11f}#++fR}+##fifff;++t#f#ffi#1111#ff+ +f##1#+1f if+ffk#4+;ff;f+#;11111 iff Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ____I _ L - T '- R _______________ L - T - R _______________ __ ____________I_______________________ Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 _______________I~_______________ 0 0 1 1 0 _______________ 0 0 2 0 0 I_______________ ____________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 1197 9 0 1296 0 Growth Adj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inltlal Hse 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 1147 9 0 1246 0 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Volume 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 1147 9 0 1246 0 ReduCt Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 0 175 0 0 0 ______________________________I 0 1147 9 _______________ 0 1246 0 _______________ ____________I Critical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module Cnflict Vol xxxx xxxx 57B xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 964 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move CaP xxxx xxxX 469 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 38 xxxx xxxx xxxx ______________________________ xxxx xxxx xxxx _______________I xxxx xxxx xxxx _______________ ____________ Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx 1 7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 17 4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move 1 C 1 f i " 1 Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx-X XXXX X~~ xxacx x~ocx ~~ Sharedpueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx %XXX X~X x x;c~cx xxxx ~~04 Shared LOS * • # * f f f + # ApproachDel 17 9 xxxxxx xxxxxx XXX~tXX ApproachLOS C 1 TraffiX 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling AsSOC Licensed Co LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c ~D /QI • Opening Year -with pro)ect-PT ______________ Ue Aug 24, 2004 17 __________________ 29 40 _____ Page 6-1 ____ ____________ __ Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye ar with Pro]ect Conditions - PM _____________________ _____ __________ ____________ ________________ Level ______________ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) #*f#f*###1ff 1f*1f #*lf1t1111f ###11t1 #f111f1}!ff }f}f#f 4*fl lffl#iR f#f }f 1**f 11f #f *f• intersection #5 Haven Avenue /Baseline Road ffrf**1#f}#f *#ff*ff}**lfffff fof##lfff*fflfff## ff**1fff+*f #*f 1f1 f1f#* flff#1**lfff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 740 ' Loss Time (s ec) 8 (Y*R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 32 C Optimal Cycle 54 Level O f Service }f 11 ff#*f*1ft• }*1k**ff}#*f ###kff}#*11f*##* flfk*fff#!!ff#ff#* f}#f1f##f *f!*!1f * f 1f Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound w est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ________I L - T - R ______________I _ L I____ T R ___________ _____ Control I_______________ Protected _______ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Lanes ___ _______________ II_______________~ _______________ I____ ___________ _________ Volume Module 276 1584 171 175 962 93 279 609 187 188 511 216 Base Vol th Ad G 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] row Initial Bse 276 1584 171 175 962 93 279 609 187 158 511 216 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 PHF Ad] PHF Volume 287 1698 178 182 1001 97 290 634 195 169 532 225 Reduct Vol V l 0 0 0 287 1648 178 0 0 0 182 1001 97 0 0 0 290 634 195 0 164 0 0 532 225 o Reduced 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] Final Vol 287 1648 178 _______________ 182 1001 97 _______________ 290 634 195 _______________ 164 ____ 532 225 ___________I ____________ Saturation Fl ow Module 1800 1600 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Sat/Lane 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 Ad)ustment 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 74 0 26 1 00 2 00 1 00 1 00 2 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3200 5900 1800 _______________I 3200 9924 976 I_______________' 1700 3600 1800 _______________I 1700 ____ 3600 1800 ___________) ____________I Capacity Anal ysis Module 0 10 0 12 0 Vol/Sat 0 09 0 31 0 10 0 06 0 20 0 20 0 17 0 18 0 11 #*± f##* #}** f+ff CriC Moves 15 0 91 3 91 3 7 7 34 0 39 0 23 1 27 8 27 8 15 3 20 0 20 0 Green Time 60 0 74 0 29 0 74 0 60 0 60 0 74 0 63 0 39 0 63 0 74 0 63 Volume/Cap Delay/Veh 0 91 8 26 2 19 3 56 5 27 9 27 9 43 0 33 0 29 7 44 8 91 7 40 0 r DelAd) U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 se Adz Del/Veh 41 8 26 2 19 3 56 5 27 9 27 9 43 0 33 0 29 7 44 B 91 7 90 0 HCM2kAvg 5 15 9 4 10 10 10 9 5 6 9 7 iff Ikff#if#f4*I# f*Yf1f##f!k##*}f #}f*}ff}#!f#}f}##rt }+f}#*R#*f #iff##} ###f *4##ff#}f Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~ p l~pa- • Opening Year-with project-PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 29 40 Page 7-1 Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye _ ar Wi[h Project _________________ Conditions - PM __________________ ______ _____ ______ _________________ __________ Level Of Service Comput ation Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) •t lraw1f1f11x1ff1 wf1w111f+x1 x1f 1wwaf1lffa•w1f 11f11f tf1:tw1r1rx1 r1ax11 1fxffftflrf Intersection q6 H aven Avenue /Foothill Bouleva rd •kllffitlff wlf ilf 111ffffRlfw f 1f 1k4r44ft111ftw ffifftf xf }1111111}!1111# xxfl111ww1f Cycle (sec) 100 Critic al Vol /Cap (X) 0 823 Loss Time (sec) a (Y+R = 4 sec) Averag e Delay (sec/veh) 36 8 Optimal Cycle 71 Level Of Service D 1wxf fwlw xxlflrx lfrlfx xf rxrxr+xll rrxx1r11r1111111f 111f1•lrwr rflxxxllrxrflr f1x1f11 Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R _________ L - T - R ~_______________ L - _____ T ____ - R ______ ___________________ Control Protected I______ Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 Lanes _________ ___________ I_______________ II_______________ _____ ____ ______ _______ Volume Module Base Vol 399 1577 251 232 750 80 493 902 131 362 758 287 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 399 1577 251 232 750 80 993 902 131 362 758 287 1 00 er Ad U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z s 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 PHF Adz PHF Volume 916 1644 262 242 782 83 514 941 137 377 790 299 . Reduct Vol 0 l 416 0 0 1699 262 0 0 0 242 782 83 0 0 0 514 941 137 0 377 0 790 0 299 Reduced Vo 1 00 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 1 00 MLF Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z Final Vol 416 _____ 1694 262 __________ 292 782 83 _______________ 514 941 137 II_______________' 377 _____ 790 _____ 299 _____ ____________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 2 00 3 46 0 59 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 1 78 0 29 2 00 3 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3200 ____ 6211 989 __________I 3200 5900 1800 I_______________ 3200 3143 457 ~~_______________I 3200 _____ 5900 _____ 1800 _____ ____________I_ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 13 0 26 0 26 0 08 0 14 0 OS 0 16 0 30 0 30 0 12 11x1 0 15 0 17 Crit Moves f11r 32 2 32 2 x111 9 2 21 8 21 8 +111 24 9 36 3 36 3 14 3 25 8 25 8 Green Time 19 6 66 0 21 0 65 0 82 0 82 0 82 0 57 0 65 Volume/Cap 0 66 0 82 0 82 0 82 0 Delay/Veh 39 9 33 8 33 8 61 5 37 2 32 9 35 4 33 3 33 3 53 1 32 8 36 2 User DelAdj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad7De1/Veh 39 9 33 8 33 8 61 5 37 2 32 4 35 4 33 3 33 3 53 1 32 8 36 2 HCM2kAvg 7 16 16 6 8 2 8 17 18 8 8 9 xx xlxlffxx111x1fx11x wxrx1141x1 x 11xxxxx1xx41fx11f 1x1f lxRx*xxx4 xxiRxxllxx xx11w11 x1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c ~.p /03 Gpening Year -with project-PT ______________ Ue Aug 24, 2004 17 __________________ 24 90 _______ Page 8-1 ___ ____________ __ Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye ar With Project Conditions - PM _______________________ _____ ____________ ____________ ________________ Level ____________ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) ixifffifir}f f wf i+if111f1f111 1lf}}fiM/~1f11fi}1} ffiffilflfrxlwflflfifl fff llf+f }1ff Intersection #7 Haven Avenue /Arrow Route 11f:ef1111f 1} ff}f if}11l 111411 }iif1t11111fi1f1f4 11fifflfl111f 1111}Ifll flRlfflif}w1 Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 839 Loss Time (s ec) B (Y.R = 4 sec) Average Delay (set/veh) 3G•2 Optimal Cycl e 75 Level O f Service D 1f}w1f w11 fif i fflfiflffaf xf+ai }f ifllfifflfuf1f 1 111 111fiff11f 1f iafiff 1 f1 1 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ____ __ L - T - R _______________ L I____ - T R ___________ ____________ Control _______________ Protected II_________ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 Lanes __ ~_______________ I_______________ _______________ ____ ___________~ __________ Volume Module l 333 1665 327 V 91 1000 189 373 834 115 316 793 171 o Base Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 333 1665 327 91 1000 189 373 834 115 316 743 171 User Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 j 0 92 0 52 0 S2 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 C 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 FHF Ad] PHF Volume 364 1818 357 99 1092 206 907 910 126 345 811 187 . Redact Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 364 1818 357 99 1092 206 407 910 126 395 811 187 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adj Final Vol 364 1818 357 _______________I 99 1092 206 ___-___________ 407 910 126 _______________I 345 ____ 811 187 ___________ ____________I Saturation Fl Sat/Lane ow Module 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 t 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Adz ustmen 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 52 0 48 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 1 63 0 37 Lanes Final Sat 2 3200 5900 1800 ______________I 3200 4542 858 _______________ 3200 3600 1800 _______________~ 3200 ____ 2926 674 ___________ ____________ Capacity Anal _ ysis Module Vol/Sat 0 11 0 34 0 20 0 03 0 24 0 24 3 0 25 0 07 0 1 0 11 0118 0 28 Crit Moves .f.f iii+ 29 7 2 x 111 15 2 33 8 33 8 19 4 33 0 33 0 Green Time 14 1 40 1 40 1 9 7 3 7 Volume/Cap 0 81 0 89 0 99 0 89 0 81 0 81 0 B4 0 75 0 21 0 75 0 84 0 84 Delay/Veh 52 1 30 1 22 9 86 3 35 6 35 6 53 5 32 0 23 7 47 7 36 5 36 5 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/veh 52 1 30 1 22 9 86 3 35 6 35 6 53 5 32 0 23 7 97 7 36 5 36 5 HCM2kAvg 8 19 8 3 14 14 9 14 3 7 17 17 f 1.11if1fifl.f +tiiR11f 1f 11111f ..ftlffflifilxlx+f +lfi.1f 1f1f1f..fi flli ifi1.11fff. Traffix 7 6 0715 Ic) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSP, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~ ~,~ ~o~ Opening Year-wiCh protect-PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 24 40 Page 9-1 ___________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year With Pro3ect Conditions - PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t ~~ir••~~sr~x~i.~aia~~i+~•~~t~~~~a rsr:i~»~~»i~~a: ~~~~r~•+~~~i+~i~ia~~i a~•:~~~• Intersection t{8 Haven Avenue/Commercial Access ::...:~...:~~.....h......+.~~~.:.......w..R.:.......a...R...xx.........R.:+s+:.... Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 2 Worst Case Level Of Service B[ 12 6] .~~.~.:.~.~:..:....r....::.:::............:.+...t......:+ia »++::.~~...:.~.~::.. Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Hound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __________________________ _ L - T - R _______________ __ ___________________________I_ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights Include Include Include Znclude 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes ___I_____________________________________________ _______________ _________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 2309 0 0 1920 30 0 0 59 0 0 0 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 2309 0 0 1420 30 0 0 59 0 0 0 User Ada 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Volume 0 2309 0 0 1420 30 0 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 2309 0 0 1420 30 0 0 59 ______________II_______________I_______________I~ 0 0 0 _______________ _____________ Critical Gap Module . Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 x ____________I_______________II______________________________ xxxx xxxx xxxxx _______________I Capacity Module Cnflict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 531 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 531 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 it ___I_______________~_______________I_______________ xxxx xxxx xxxx _______________I _________ Level Of Service Module xx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12 6 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move ' ' ' ' ' ' ' B Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT x x xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x x SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x ~ xx*cx xxecx xxxecx Shared LOS ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ApproachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 12 6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS ' B Traffrx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA C ~1~ !b~ Opening Year-with protect-PTue Aug 24, 2004 17 24 40 ______________________________________ Page 10=1 _____________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year with Protect Conditions - PM ____________________________________ _______ ____________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) iRf*f if it4f }Rf1f 114!1*4ff11tf ffff 1ft41f4if411ff*f44fflffftlf**1f 4*1f *f *fitfff ift Intersection #9 Haven Avenue/26th street ffif*f44*f11ff*1f**fi *41f ifRlf iffllft 1ff*fflfi4f}lfkfftffftlfff4tffti}fii*f1f*fi B( 14 0) Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 3 worst Case Level Of Service *if11ff 1411 •f*14f lfftf 4!144!! 1ffff*ffff*ffff+fffiflfif*4}lfiff *ffi*ff*fffkl ff *ff Approach Vorth Hound South Bound East Bound west Bound R Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T R ______________~ __________ L T ____' ___ ______ _ ____ ~_______________I______ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign g P Sto Si n Rights Include Include Include Include 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lanes _____I_______________II_______________II_______________II _______________I _______ Volume Module. 20 0 0 72 0 0 0 Base Vol 0 2265 0 0 1960 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 0 0 0 Initral Bse 0 2265 0 0 1460 20 0 0 72 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 User Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 PHF Adz 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 PHF Volume 0 2531 0 0 1631 22 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 2531 0 0 1631 22 0 0 80 ___ ______________________I__ Critical Gap Module • Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module x xxxxx xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx xxxx ~~ ~xx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 17 xxxx xxxx xxxx volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx _______________~_______________I~_______________ _______________~ ____________ Level Of Service Module xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 6 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x 0 x cx 14 xxxxx xxxxx xx x xxxxx xxxx xx ' Slopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx * 8 * * f f LOS by Move LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement x xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx xx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ~~ xxxxx x x x xx cx xxxx x xx ~ * Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx~*cx ~~ xx * } e ~ Shared LOS 4 f ApprcachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 14 0 ~~ * ApproachLOS * B Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • c.~ D la ~ Opening Year-with ____ pro]ect-PTue Aug 24, 2004 17 _______________________ 24 90 Page 11=1 ___ _____________ Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino Cour,.y Opening Ye ___ ar With Pro]ect Conditions - PM ____________________________________ ____ _________ ___ _________________ ________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) •1+«1l 11l1!«1111+ f}+f+}•+1+f 1f1111«!+lf1+•f}1« 141!!}f+1}441!++«f+1f 1 1+1!11!+f +f+ Intersection #10 Haven Avenue/6th Street fffRlfff l#f}1411 i f lfflff+f «1 11l+4411++fflff+f} +++ff111}f 1++kf+++f}++ +1+++}f }+ +14 Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 703 Loss Time (sec) 6 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 22 2 Optimal Cycle 42 Level Of Service C +++a1++ +}+ flff}+f+f+f+}1+ 1f}f+1+f++f 1+1++1f}+4414!+11+ 111}+f if+f l+ff}+a +++41 11 Approach No rth Bound Sou[h Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R _____~ L - T - R '_______________ L ____ - T _________ R __ ____ ____________I___________ Control Protected I__________ Protected Permitted Permitted Rights Include Include include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Lanes ___I____ ___________ I_______________ _______________ ____ _________ __I _________ Volume Module l 108 V 1821 143 123 1588 81 90 225 102 182 282 83 o Base Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 108 1821 193 123 1588 81 90 225 102 182 282 83 1 00 er Ad U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] s 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 0 96 PHF Adz PHF Volume 113 1899 199 128 1656 84 94 235 106 190 299 87 Redact Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 113 1899 149 128 1656 84 99 235 106 190 299 87 PCE Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Val 113 ____ 1899 149 __________ 128 1656 89 _______________I 94 235 106 I_______________ 190 ____ 299 _________ 87 __) ____________~_ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 18 00 Ad]ustment 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 2 78 0 22 2 00 2 85 0 15 0 22 0 54 0 24 1 00 1 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 1700 ____ 5007 393 __________~ 3200 5138 262 _______________ 388 971 490 _______________ 1700 ____ 1800 18 _________ 00 __ ____________I_ Capacity Analyses Module Vol/Sa[ 0 07 0 38 0 38 0 04 0 32 0 32 0 24 0 29 0 29 f1}f 0 11 0 16 0 OS Crit Moves 10 2 1f}f 53 9 53 9 f4++ 5 7 49 5 49 5 34 9 34 4 34 4 34 4 34 4 34 4 Green Time 65 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 65 0 65 0 70 0 70 0 70 D 32 0 48 0 14 Volume/Cap 0 51 7 17 9 17 9 58 0 19 4 19 4 32 1 32 1 32 1 24 6 26 3 22 7 Delay/Veh 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAd3 51 7 17 9 17 9 58 0 19 4 19 4 32 1 32 1 32 1 24 6 26 3 22 7 Ad]Del/Veh 16 3 14 13 12 13 13 9 7 2 HCM2kAvg 5 16 1!!1«+ 1 f 11 f}«f+«+}f++f+++++4 411+++++x44 1!«+4111+++a+++41 4+a141f++1+«++++a4 f++1 1 x Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ YID 6a ~I Opening Year-with ______ pro? ect-PT ___________ Ue Aug 24, 2004 17 __________________ 24 40 _____ Page 12-1 ___ ___________ Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye ar With Project C onditions - PM Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) f•+}1111}f}111 *f 1 1*}11!11*}f *+111}#!1111!!11 *f 111frf*1f1}1111111#111 !1}1!!111111 Intersection #11 Haven Avenu e/4th Street •1f11f 1ff }f 41k}4# f1441111}t1 1}111f111111111111 11f}41141!}!11}*4ff411 ff111411111t Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 885 " Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y4R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) :4 33 Optimal Cycle 93 Level O f Service C 1111}! ! #14}14}1#11!11#11 1}11111}}1! 1!11}}*1f1+11!14+1 *a+flfaff}f 114111}!114 441! 1 Approach No rth Hound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ______ L - T - R _______________~ L ____ - T - R ___________ ______________ Control Protected I_________ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes _______ ___________ I_______________ I_______________I ~____ ___________I _________ Volume Module l 197 V 1906 231 176 1652 90 98 530 160 220 422 119 o Base Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Hse 147 1906 231 176 1652 90 98 530 160 220 922 119 User Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz PHF Volume 155 2011 294 186 1793 95 103 559 169 232 445 126 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 155 2011 294 186 1743 95 103 599 169 232 445 126 1 00 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 1 00 MLF Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z Final Vol 155 _____ 2011 249 __________I 186 1743 95 _______________II 103 559 169 _______________I 232 ____ 995 126 ___________ ____________I Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 Adjustment 00 2 68 0 32 2 00 2 85 0 15 1 00 1 54 0 46 1 DO 1 56 0 44 Lanes 2 Final Sat 3200 ____ 9816 9B9 __________I 3200 5121 279 I_______________I 1700 2765 835 _______________I 1700 ____ 2808 792 ___________ _____________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 92 0 42 0 06 0 34 0 34 0 06 Of±O 0 20 0 14 f}R 0 16 0 16 Crit Moves 6 7 f*4* 47 2 47 2 441! 6 6 97 0 47 0 10 6 22 8 22 8 15 4 27 7 27 7 Green Time 0 72 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 72 0 72 0 57 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 57 0 57 Volume/Cap Delay/Veh 57 3 28 1 28 1 79 3 22 3 22 3 97 0 98 6 98 6 69 4 31 9 31 9 User DelAd3 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad3De1/Veh 57 3 28 1 28 1 79 3 22 3 22 3 97 0 48 6 98 6 69 4 31 9 31 9 HCM2kAVg 4 29 25 S 16 17 9 i9 14 10 B 8 44 f}*f#f 1}f}4f}f1Rf* f}4}*f1114} *44fY11}*ifTf 4i#*4 }}Y14}44}*14Yf 1f} f}}4 1114}4111! Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c$o ras' Opening Year-with pro]ect-PTue Aug 24, 2004 17 24 40 Page 13-1 Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye _____ ar With Pro]ect Conditions - PM ___________________________________ ______ ___________ _________________ ______ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) '111 11111+1111+ +1R+if111faf11faR+ 118+111faf R++8181811+1 R 111f++if Rf+ 11118+1116+rf Intersection }Y12 Haven Avenu e/I-10 Westbound R amps f11+fa1Rfi1111111 Rf1ff11f111 111+111111 1111#f11 111f11t1f 1}1111}1 R1f1f R 1f111f1f1ff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 561 ` Loss Time (sec) 4 (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/~eh) 12 2 Optimal Cycle 25 Level O f Service k B 111111f11f1 1+181 1fa111f of 111 11111 814111 11}}111f+111faff11 11i1114f11#1f+181 R1f 11 Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R --------I --- L - T - R ___________I __ I- L - I_____ T R __________I _ (--- ------------ Control ___________ Permitted - II--- Permitted P S lit Phase Spl it Phase Rights Ignore Include Include Include Mtn Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Lanes ____I____ ___________ II_______________I I_______________I I_____ __________I ________ Volume Module 0 0 0 274 0 528 Base Vol 0 2936 987 0 1889 985 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Hse 0 2436 487 0 1889 985 0 0 0 274 0 528 1 00 er Ad U 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z s 0 93 0 93 0 00 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 PHF Ad] PHF Volume 0 2628 0 0 2038 1063 0 0 0 296 0 570 Redact VO1 0 0 0 0 2628 0 0 0 0 0 2038 1063 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 0 0 0 570 Reduced Vol PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 0 ____ 2628 0 ___________I 0 2038 1063 I_______________I 0 0 0 I_______________II 296 _____ 0 570 __________I ____________I Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Ad]ustment 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 0 94 0 00 4 00 1 00 0 00 3 29 1 71 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 00 0 00 2 00 Lanes Final Sat 0 ____ 7200 1800 __________I 0 5915 3085 I_______________I 0 0 0 I_______________II 1700 _____ 0 3900 __________I ____________I_ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 00 0 36 0 00 0 00 0 34 0 34 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 17 1f+ 0 00 0 17 Crit Moves 1fi} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 31 0 Green Time 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 65 Volume/Cap 0 00 0 56 0 00 0 00 0 53 0 53 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 56 0 00 0 59 0 0 9 8 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 29 2 Delay/Veh 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAd] 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 29 2 Ad]Del/Veh 0 0 9 8 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 4 HCM2kAvg 0 11 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 8 0 8 f 111 1* kill**+111111#R1f+ #1ff 184111+ 1R*R11 F1##111811+841111+1111 R1R1Rf11ff+1 1111 R Traff ix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~~ Go9 lJ YEAR 2025 WITH PROJECT C~ 8224;04(R GLEN'431\Tremc\Zone Change Leiter wpd) ~ ~~~ l La Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATue Aug 24, 2004 17 25 11 Page 2-1 _____________________________________________________ _____ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro]ect Conditions - AM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volume Alternative) +++a+rrrrrrrwarrrr++rr++a+•r+ra+•rrrr+rr+a+rrrr•rrrr+rrrrr++++rrarr++++++++++++• Intersection ql Hezmosa Avenue/Arrow Route ++r+a+rrarrr++rrr•rarr++arr+rra+arrrrr+a+rrrrrrarrrraarr+r++aarrrara+++++rr+++rr Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 625 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 24W9 Optimal Cycle 40 Level Of Service C +rra+rrr+rrra+rrrra+a+aa+ararrraarrr++araarrrraarrrraa:rrraaa++rarrr+++++++++..+ Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________I______________________________I______________________________~ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ____________I_______________I_______________'_______________II_______________I Volume Module Base Vol 77 131 184 70 226 90 39 816 196 236 955 45 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 77 131 184 70 226 90 39 816 196 236 955 45 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad] 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 81 138 199 79 238 42 91 859 154 248 1005 47 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 81 138 199 79 238 42 91 859 159 298 1005 47 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 OO 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol B1 138 199 74 238 42 41 859 154 ~ 298 1005 47 Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Lanes 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 70 0 30 1 00 1 91 0 09 Final Sat 1800 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1800 3223 577 1800 3629 171 ___________________________I_______________I_______________~I_______________I Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 07 0 10 0 04 0 13 0 02 0 02 0 27 0 27 0 14 0 28 0 28 Crit Moves aa'. +*+• 'r.a .r+a Green Time 7 2 19 9 19 9 7 8 20 0 20 0 4 9 42 7 92 7 22 1 59 8 59 8 Volume/Cap 0 62 0 37 0 52 0 52 0 62 0 it 0 46 0 62 0 62 0 62 0 96 0 96 Delay/Veh 59 3 35 3 36 9 47 9 39 8 32 8 50 0 23 2 23 2 38 3 11 3 11 3 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adz Del/Veh 59 3 35 3 36 9 47 9 39 8 32 8 SO 0 23 2 23 2 38 3 11 3 11 3 HCM2kAVg 9 4 6 3 8 1 2 13 13 B 9 9 .+a+arrrrr+rrraar+aaraarr+ra.a+rr++raa+arr•w++asra+.arwar+rrr«xarr+ar++++ar+arrr Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • G~D /ll Year 2025 - with project- ATue Aug 24, 2004 17 25 11 Page 3-1 Hagen/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditrons - AM ______________________ _____ ___________ ____________ ______________________________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) #111!#1! #111 1 1ff 1##ff1+111ff1f111f11ff1f1f#ff1 #111r11ff #1!111!##1f 111 1!!111!1!!! Intersection #2 Center Avenue/Arrow Route f 1f 1f #f lff 1f 1111!##1111!#Yfflfff14f1f#lfff##ff #4111#f 1f 1f 1f #fk##ff##f fff1f1f 1111 Avezage Dela y (sec/veh) 39 3 Worst Case Level Of Service F[494 6] 11 w1f111ff 111! 1!11!!1!111#11!!11!#af 11!1!1!1#111 #1111+1l111!l111##11#11 1 1f #f 1l 11 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound we st Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R _______ L - T - R _______________I L _____ T R __________ ____ Control ______________________ I Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Unc ontrolled Rights Include include Include Include 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes ___ I_______________~_______________ _______________~ _____ __________I _________ Volume Module 61 1 96 52 2 37 14 1030 19 94 1136 10 Base Vol th Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 l Grow Initial Bse 61 1 46 52 2 37 14 1030 19 44 1136 10 User Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 99 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Ad) PHF Volume 64 1 48 55 2 39 15 1084 20 46 1196 it Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol _ 64 1 98 55 2 39 ______________________________ 15 1089 20 I_______________ 46 _____ 1196 11 __________ ___________ Critical Gap Module Crrtrcal Gp 7 9 6 S 6 9 7 5 6 5 6 9 9 1 xxxx xxxxx 4 1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim ____ 3 5 4 0 3 3 3 5 4 0 3 3 _______________I_______________ 2 2 xxxx xxxxx _______________~ 2 2 _____ xxxx xxxxx __________ ________ Capacity Module Cnflict Val 1815 2423 552 1866 2427 603 1206 xxxx xxxxx 1109 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap 50 33 482 46 33 947 9B5 xxxx xxxxx 640 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 40 30 982 37 29 947 9B5 xxxx xxxxx 640 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap _I 1 61 0 04 0 10 1 98 0 07 0 09 _______________I_______________ 0 03 xxxx xxxx _______________~ 0 07 _____ xxxx xxxx __________I ___________ Level Of Servrce Module xx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 1 xxxx xxxxx 0 2 xxxx xxxxx Queue x xxxx xx x xxxx xxxxx it 3 xxxx xxxxx 11 1 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del x xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move 1 1 f ' 1 1 LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT B LT - LTR - RT B LT - LTR - RT Movement Shared Cap xxxx 65 xxxxx xxxx 59 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue x xxxx 10 2 xxxxx xxxxx 8 8 xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd S[pDel x xxxx 495 xxxxx xxxxx 465 xxxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx x # xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS # F • * F f ApproachDel 994 6 965 2 xxxxxx xx xxxx ApproachLOS F F TTafflx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling ASSOC Lrcensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~~ pia . Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATUe Aug 29, 2004 17 26 11 Page 4-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - AM _____________________________ ___________ ________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 4+ff#+If+ff}fff}+1ff}ff4ff#f11f}++++f1t#f}ifflf#4+f#iff}if11##fTf+}}# }ff#itfl }ff Intersection k3 Residential Access/Arrow Route !!!11111!1 #f 1}}+f }1f++f 11 !+41!11! 41f1f1111fiff+1}1#1}4}1f #fflRif 1 111 111#1 #+f e Delay (sec/veh) 0 1 Worst Case Level Of Service Avera B[ 12 9] g 111!1+1}}aff1.}1}#}1f 1f+#1111!+f1f.}1f.f+!.1.1!1!11.}1f 1f++1f+lfff+f . f }1111 11111 Approach North Bound South Bound Eas[ Bound we ~ st Bound - R L Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T __I____________________ ___ T R __________I ____________I_______________I__________ Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Unc ontrolled Rights Include Include Include Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Lanes _I_______________II_______________I____________________ __________ ___________ Volume Module B 0 1190 0 Base Vol 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 1039 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 1039 8 0 1190 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 r Ad U 1 00 1 00 z se 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 9H 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 98 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 1099 8 0 1253 0 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 D 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1094 8 0 1253 0 Final Vol 0 0 26 0 __________I_ _________________ _ __________ __I __ __ Critical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x ~~ Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ____________________II___________________________________ x~ __________ _______ Capacity Module xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol xxxx xxxx 551 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 983 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x x Move Cap xxxx xxxx 983 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx x Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 OS xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ______________________________I~____________________ xxxx xxxx __________ ____________ Level Of Service Module xxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx 0 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x x xxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 12 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx } xxx x k R 1 } B f f f 4 LOS by Move LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx'cx xxxxx f f # xx ycx xxxxx 1 Shared LOS * + * 1 . f 12 9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel 1 ~ 1 ApproachLOS B + Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling A55oc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~ l~3 Year 2025 - with pro? ect- Aiue Aug 29, 2004 17 25 11 Page 5=1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County ]ear 2025 with Project Conditions - AM Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) • 1f11ff 1f 11f111ffff1f1ff11f1fff11fff1f+f 1f 1 f1rff 1111111!111 w1 f1ff11r1f 14!11! f111 In[ersecti on #9 Commercial Access/Arrow Route 4*f}11w 1f 1f111wff111f1 f1ff 1t 1f 1fl1iff 1f 1 414! 1wfw111ff 1wf 1l41l1lif'/flfiff}f 1f 111! B[ 13 0] Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 1 Worst Case Level Of Service 1f wf 1fffllfff if kw11f1fff4f1111f 1ff411ffif1f 111 wff#11ff1tf44111fffff1f1f1 f11 nd B Approach North Bound South Hound East Hound ou West T R Movement L- T- R L- T- R ____ L T R _______________II L _______________ ___ _____________________P___9 trol Stop Sign Sto Si n C Uncontrolled Uncontrolled on Include Include Include include Rights 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 Lanes 0 0 ___I_______________~I_______________ _______________ _______________I _________ Volume Module 0 0 0 0 996 68 0 1189 0 Base VO1 0 0 26 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 0 0 0 0 996 68 0 1184 0 Initial Bse 0 0 26 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 0 27 0 0 0 0 1048 72 0 1246 0 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RedUCt Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1048 72 0 1246 0 Final Vol 0 0 27 . Critical Gap Module xxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx Capacity Module xx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx 560 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 477 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx 477 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 06 xxxx xxxx xxxx _______________I_______________ xxxx xxxx _______________I _______________ ____________I Level Of Service Module xx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx 0 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx xxxx cx xxxxx x xx xx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 13 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx + f xxxxx xxxx x 1 * ~ LOS by Move • B LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement x xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx x x xxx ti X x xxx xxx~ x xx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx*cx ; xxx ~- ~ , , , Shared LOS f f f 1 xxxxxx 13 0 xxxxxx ApproachDel xxxxxx w f ApproachLOS H 1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA . ~ ~~ ~ !y S Year 2025 - with protect- ATue Aug 24, 2009 17 25 11 Page 6-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranch o Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Protect Conditions - AM __________________________ _____ _____ ____________ _________________ Level O _________ f Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operati ons Method (Base Volume Alternative) X11}44111!}4 }4f}111}#}}f}1#if f llTif}4f}f}#i44# +#fi4}14411ffi4411f 41l1 1411f4ttif} Intersection #5 Haven Avenue/ Baseline Road 1fii44 }4}444i4i414 f}4114411i41fiffl f}}}11}x1 44111}1i 44}4f1+4}11414441! 4.4l1 14111 Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 787 Loss Time (s ec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 32 C Optimal Cycl e 62 Level Of Service af 44f 44i44f i• f}4f 41x1:ff 1 f 41w 1f 1f}4}af}f41 ia#f}af14}1111411 }14f11f14f}1f.#1f414f Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound Movement L - T - A L - T - R ______ L - T - R I_______________ L _____ T R __________I Control __ Protected I_________ Protected Protected Pr otected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Lanes __ _______________I I_______________I _______________ I_____ __________ __________ Volume Module 153 699 87 128 1469 219 230 407 251 197 836 213 Base Vol 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 153 694 87 128 1464 219 230 407 251 197 836 213 Initial Bse 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User AdJ 1 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz pHF Volume 161 731 92 135 1541 231 242 928 264 207 880 224 . Reduct Vol 0 0 0 731 92 0 0 0 135 1941 231 0 0 0 292 428 264 0 207 0 0 880 224 Reduced Vol 161 1 00 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF AdJ Final Vol 161 731 92 _______________ 135 1541 231 _______________ 292 428 264 _______________I 207 _____ 880 2241 __________ ____________ Saturation Flow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Adtustment 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 61 0 39 1 00 2 00 1 00 1 00 2 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3400 5700 1900 _______________I 3900 9958 792 _______________ 1800 3800 1900 _______________ 1800 _____ 3800 1900 __________ ____________ Capacrty Analysis Module 0 14 0 12 0 12 0 Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 13 0 OS 0 09 0 31 0 31 0 13 0 11 41* Crit Moves 41}1 ++i. 39 5 39 5 }11. 17 1 25 4 28 4 21 1 29 9 29 4 Green Time 6 0 34 8 39 8 10 7 0 55 0 55 0 79 0 40 Volume/Cap 0 79 0 37 0 19 0 37 0 79 0 79 0 79 0 44 Delay/Veh 64 5 24 5 22 5 92 1 28 5 28 5 52 9 31 7 33 6 36 9 36 2 28 7 r DelAd7 U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 se Adz Del/Veh 64 5 24 5 22 5 42 1 28 5 28 5 52 4 31 7 33 6 36 9 36 2 28 7 HCM2kAvg 4 6 2 2 18 18 9 6 8 6 14 6 t14441k 4!14!4*#f4}41 1}flf iflk+}}f1#11 tt1}1f##44+1441i 441~1}}4}1}111}1+1 44114 #1ff Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RZVERSZDE, CA • C ~D lIS Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATUe Aug 29, 2009 17 2S 11 Page 7-1 • Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro]ect Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1"116##111#}1}11#1111#1!111}}flf1f1f1111f if*k111111fiflfffli"4}11fi}lfilf ififfii Intersection q6 Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard iflf if *f#1f#*f#11111 R1#11111##}}f}fif}f1f"}lfif}lf if #ffi*f}"ii}1111}11!!11l4fi}f Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 777 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y*R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 33 4 Optimal Cycle 60 Level Of Service C •!ffi*#}1ff#}f#flf llfi#1111}f#tfi1}fif#if11fif11"if 111#1}i{f}}#f}111!!111#f I1Yf}}+ Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R ____________________I_______________I_______________~I_______________ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 ____________I_______________I_______________I______________________________ Volume Module Hase Vol 293 754 131 275 1523 174 230 598 263 338 971 122 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 293 754 131 275 1523 174 230 598 263 338 971 122 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad] 0 95 0 98 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 308 794 138 289 1603 183 242 629 277 356 1022 128 Reduct Vol 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 308 794 138 289 1603 183 242 629 277 356 1022 128 PCE Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 308 794 138 289 1603 183 292 629 277 356 1022 128 ____________~______________________________I______________________________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad]ustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 41 0 59 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 1 39 0 61 2 00 3 00 1 00 Final Sat 3900 6975 1125 3400 5700 1900 3400 2639 1161 3400 5700 1900 ____________I_______________I_______________I______________________________I Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 09 0 12 0 12 0 09 0 28 0 10 0 07 0 29 0 24 0 10 0 18 0 07 Crit Moves "ff* ffi! fi*f+ f#f# Green Time 11 7 28 2 28 2 19 6 36 2 36 2 12 5 30 7 30 7 13 5 31 6 31 6 Volume/Cap 0 78 0 93 0 43 0 43 0 78 0 27 0 57 0 78 0 78 0 78 0 57 0 21 Delay/veh 52 3 29 5 29 5 35 8 30 3 22 7 43 0 34 9 39 9 50 0 28 9 29 3 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adz Del/veh 52 3 29 5 29 5 35 8 30 3 22 7 93 0 34 9 34 9 50 0 28 9 26 3 HCM2kAvg 7 6 6 4 16 9 4 14 14 7 9 3 i}1i}if}f#}ffi}f1}wlff}f}ff}f1##f}#}}#}1ffi}fii}}f+ff#+11#f#1if }}1f }#}}}#}#}f +1ff Traffzx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Lrcensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA c~0 /i4 . Year 2025 - wi*_h protect- ATUe Aug 29, 2009 17 25 11 Page &-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino Count}• Year 202 5 With Protect Conditions - AM _________________________ ____ ______ ______ _________________ ___________ Level ___________ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) +*fYf#f##f**f*#****###1f*i}I #+f*}1f*lltffffll} *}*f 111111141*11f#1f4} k1#f#f*}t#}f Intersection #7 H aven Avenue /Arrow Route 1111:..}.11.1*}f} 1.}++}#f 1f* 1.111f}f1+}11+11*a #aff.f.}.111 }1w1f+:... 11+1111 1f *ff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 785 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 32 1 Optimal Cycle 62 Level O f Service C }}*:1}111:1}f 111 k }1114#{1}f1 }}1111!1111#1f}111 }f}i11ff+:#11111++f#*+ +ififl}:1111 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound W est Hound Movement L - T - R __ L - T - R _______________ L - T - R I_______________I~ L ____ - T ______ - R _____ _ ________________________ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rrghts Include Include Include Inclu de Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 Lanes _______ ___________ II_______________I _______________I ____ ______ _____ _________ Volume Module Hase Vol 310 1106 194 148 1911 172 286 632 217 217 841 46 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtral Bse 310 1106 194 148 1911 172 286 632 217 217 841 46 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 326 1169 204 156 1485 181 301 665 228 228 885 98 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 326 1164 209 156 1485 181 301 665 228 228 885 48 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 326 ___ 1164 209 ___________ 156 1985 181 _______________ 301 665 228 I_______________I 228 ____ 885 ______ 98 _____ _____________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 67 0 33 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 1 90 0 10 Final Sat 3400 ____ 5700 1900 __________~ 3900 5081 619 I_______________I 3900 3800 1900 _______________I 3900 ____ 3603 ______ 197 _____ ____________I_ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 10 0 20 0 11 0 OS 0 29 0 29 0 09 0 18 0 12 0 07 0 25 1111 0 25 Cr1t Moves y#11 1111 }*}} Green Time 12 2 40 9 90 9 9 1 37 2 37 2 11 3 30 8 30 8 11 8 31 3 31 3 Volume/Cap 0 79 0 51 0 27 0 51 0 79 0 79 0 79 0 57 0 39 0 57 0 79 0 79 Delay/Veh 52 1 22 5 20 1 44 7 29 9 29 9 53 9 29 7 27 7 93 6 39 8 34 8 User DelAdj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 AdjDel/Veh 52 1 22 5 20 1 44 7 29 9 29 9 53 9 29 7 27 7 43 6 34 8 34 8 HCM2kAVg 7 9 4 3 17 17 7 9 6 4 15 15 f*1}1*}1f*11*11111 #}114111}11 111}+Y}#111114#*}* 1*1111*+i11#+1#41 #4#:411111 *4*f*1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~~ ii7 r~ ~~ Year 2025 - with project- ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 25 11 Page 9-1 ________________________________________________________________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pzo]ect Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsrgnah zed Method (Base Volume Alternative) ff if lw+lff+lwxr11f w1f1+f +11xxftae}f+If }1f 1f 1+1f}111x1! +f111wf++}Iwxlx if •11111111 Intersection t!8 Haven Avenue/COnvnercial Access x1111}+11rf1wxaff11+1f11xxxxx+xl}+f}w11f+f1w}ifxfxf111w1}11f1x1x}1!x1}11xx1fefxf Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 0 Worst Case Level Of Service C~, 15 1J 1111!11}xxll}xlxf1f111+11}118 111fIfw11f11f 1f It}1k11w1111f11111f+f1xflw}lltfkf lff Approach North Bound South Bound East Hound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R ____II_______________I_____________________p___9____ ____________I___________ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Sto Si n Rights Include Include Include Include Lanes 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 0 0 0 ____________I_______________I_______________I_______________I_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 1608 0 0 1764 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initral Bse 0 1608 0 0 1764 221 0 0 9 0 0 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adj 0 98 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 0 1693 0 0 1857 233 0 0 9 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 1693 0 0 1857 233 0 0 9 0 0 O ____________II_______________II______________________________ Cn tical Gap Module Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ____________I_______________I_______________II_______________I_______________I Capacity Module Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 735 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 366 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 366 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 03 xxxx xxxx xxxx ___________________________II______________________________I_______________I Level Of Service Module 4ueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15 1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move f * 1 f } 1 1 + C w 1 Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx HharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx *oc xxxxx xx:x xxx*cx Shared LOS f f } w w } ApproachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 15 1 xxxxxx AppzoachLOS f C } Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Lrcensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA C~~ Gt ~ Year 2025 - with protect- ATUe Aug 29, 2004 17 25 11 Page 10=1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - AM _____________________________ __ ___________________________________ Level Of Service Compu[ation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Me[hod (Base Volume Alternative) f #1 t*f*1f#1111 #ft11111f**11tR11f**f1#*1tt*11111k*4f#*Yf#it*fi1f 4 ##*i #t1t#1111 iff Intersection tf9 Haven Avenue/26th Street f1t+1111l1f*f11111t11f#11twf*f*11111t*Ift*1 1 f11fIt11#1!111!1 1 111 t11 t1tIf111f a11f B( 14 8] 0 2 Worst Case Level Of Service Average Delay (sec/veh) 1iff11f#1111*11f*11f 1111+111*11R4#1111##111111+1f *f hf if lffif llf 111111#1111*1f*1f North Bound South Bound Ease Bound west Bound Approach T - R L - T - R L - T R L T R Movement L - __I ______________'_____________ _______________I _____I_______________I_ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Include Include Include Include Rights 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 ____________________I_______________I_______________I _______________I _______ Volume Module 0 0 54 0 0 0 Base Vol 0 1608 0 0 1690 83 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 0 0 0 Initial Bse 0 1608 0 0 1690 B3 0 0 54 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ada 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 96 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 98 0 95 0 95 0 0 0 PHF Volume 0 1693 0 0 1779 87 0 0 57 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 1693 0 0 1779 87 0 0 57 ____________ _____ __I__ Critical Gap Module xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx xxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 x ____________~_______________~_______________I_______________ xxxx xxxx xx _______________ Capacity Module xxxxx xxxx xxxx 637 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x >~x xxxx 425 xx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx - Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx x xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 425 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 13 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8 x xx~cx 14 xx xxxxx xxx cx xxx ecx xxxxx xx~ 8 k Slopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx 1 f l LOS by Move 1 LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shazed Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx BharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx x x xxx xxx cx xx Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x * * * . * * * R Shared LOS 1 1 ApproachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx 14 8 xxxxxx ApproachL05 * B Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~ ~~ ~i9 Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATUe _____________ Aug 24, 2004 17 ________________ 25 11 __________ Page 11-1 ___________ ______ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro]ect Conditions - AM _________________ __ ___________ ___________________ Level Of __ ______ Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM OperaCions Method (Base Volume Alternative) +f 1• +f++11111f1kf+141 111! 1+1++1++!111 +f1#f+f lf++111++lf ltfR1 11ff+1f 11111!#1141 11 Intersection #10 Haven Avenue/6th Street .+fll+1+.1.!.!11+ 11.!•!1.!!1++f .f.lf++11 1+.!1 1 1 ff+1.l111!1 ++1111+11++llf+.ff (X) l /Ca l V 669 0 Cycle (sec) 100 Cn tica p o c/veh) l ( 23 8 Loss Time ( 6 (Y+R = sec) 4 sec) Average se De ay C Optimal Cyc le 39 Level O f Service ++!1111!1.11+1 111.+ 1++111.!++1 111!1+1f 11. 1+1f+1.1!!11111++11 11.11111!1+f +llf +f ll W nd B proach A North Hound South Bound East Bound e ou st T - R p Movement L - T R - T - R _________ L - T - R _I ______________ L - _____ __________I ________ _I _ ____ Pzotected ______ Protected Permitted P ermitted Control Include Include include Include Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Green 0 2 1 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Lanes _ 1 0 2 1 0 _~_______________II 2 0 _______________I _______________I _____ __________ __________ Volume Modu le 189 1828 101 135 1372 54 110 213 93 218 394 71 Base Vol 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 169 1828 101 135 1372 54 110 213 93 218 394 71 Initial Bse 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 0 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 199 1924 106 142 1444 57 116 229 96 22 7 41 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 106 0 142 1494 57 116 224 98 229 415 75 Reduced Vol 199 1924 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 98 229 415 75 Final Vol 199 1929 106 _______________ 142 1444 57 _______________ 116 224 _______________ ~_____ __________I ___________ Saturation _ Flow Module 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 1900 190 0 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Ad]ustment 0 95 1 0 0 16 2 00 2 89 0 it 0 26 0 52 0 22 1 00 1 00 1 00 Lanes 1 00 2 84 1800 5402 298 3900 5984 216 502 973 425 1800 1900 1900 Final Sat I_______________I _______________1 1_______________1 1_____ 1 _____ ___________ Capacity An _ alysis Module 26 0 23 0 23 0 0 13 0 22 0 04 Vol/Sat 0 it 0 36 0 36 0 04 0 26 0 113 Crit Moves 3 1 1f.+ 6 3 91 9 41 9 34 5 39 5 39 5 34 5 34 5 34 5 Green Time 3 53 17 6 53 63 0 63 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 37 0 63 0 11 Volume/Cap 0 63 0 67 0 67 0 67 0 23 9 30 6 30 6 30 6 25 0 29 5 22 4 Delay/Veh 42 1 17 5 17 5 53 8 23 4 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 30 6 25 0 5 22 4 2 Ad]Del/Veh 42 1 17 5 17 5 53 8 23 9 23 9 30 6 30 6 5 2 11 7 16 15 3 13 13 12 12 12 HCM2kAvg 111 +11!1!.11.++1111 +11+f++1+1+11+f +f ff+1f 111!1+11+f.1 f+1111,*1f 1 1111+1'Y11f.11++f Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~~ ,~ Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATue Aug 29, 2004 17 25 11 Page 12-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 202 5 with Project Conditions - AM Level Of Service Comput ation Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method Base Volume Alternative) #fIT}}if}f#k#}if# Tff4#fff}*i ff}}ifff}#f}f 4ifT *f41#if *f T1f 1f }ff 1f T}1#f f#f }fik#ff# Intersection pll Haven Avenu e/4th Street #4TRiff}f}}f 4# ifff * f 111#f #f #f# #ff#1f*f##fR1f }ff ffflf}flfft *+1f}iff lff!!f##1 1T+i} Cycle (sec) 100 Critic al Vol /Cap (X) 1 028 " Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R 4 sec) Averag e Delay (sec/veh) -0 52 Optimal Cycle 180 Level Of Service #} 0 !!!!ifff#ff f}#f}f*#1f T#+f}+#ifff }af#T11f#}fff*#f1 T}#r}if x11!111#iff}fff Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound we st Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ________ L - T - R _______________ L _____ T R __________ ___ Control P TOt ected I_______ Protected Protected Pr otected Rights Include include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Lanes ___ ____ ___________ I_______________ _______________~ '_____ __________I _________ Volume Module l 238 V 1932 283 118 1362 152 117 398 106 192 1306 252 o Base Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ini[ial Bse 238 1932 283 118 1362 152 117 398 106 192 1306 252 er Ad U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z s 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Ad] PHF Volume 251 2039 298 124 1439 160 123 419 112 202 1375 265 • Redact Vol 0 0 0 298 0 0 0 124 1934 160 0 0 0 123 419 112 0 202 0 0 1375 265 Reduced Vol 251 2034 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] Final Vol 251 ____ 2039 298 ___________ 129 1439 160 _______________ 123 419 112 I_______________ 202 _____ 1375 265 __________ ____________ Saturation Fl ow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Ad]ustment 00 2 62 0 38 2 00 2 70 0 30 1 00 1 58 0 42 1 00 1 68 0 32 Lanes Final Sat 2 3400 ____ 4972 728 ___________ 3400 5128 572 I_______________ 1800 3001 799 _______________ 1800 _____ 3185 615 __________ ____________ Capacity Anal ysis Module 14 0 19 0 11 0 43 0 93 Vol/Sat 0 07 0 41 0 41 0 04 0 28 0 28 0 07 0 f.f Crit Moves f#if ..1f f.T+ 7 27 0 27 0 21 7 42 0 42 0 Green Time 9 0 39 8 39 8 3 6 39 3 39 3 6 52 0 52 0 52 1 03 1 03 Volume/Cap 0 81 1 03 1 03 1 03 0 81 0 81 1 03 0 Delay/Veh 60 0 56 5 56 5 137 7 32 7 32 7 136 5 31 5 31 5 35 8 58 9 58 9 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 60 0 56 5 56 5 137 7 32 7 32 7 136 5 31 5 31 5 35 8 58 9 58 9 HCM2kAvg 6 33 33 5 17 17 8 7 7 6 34 35 f*1f 1k#f T1!}fIT#T#f}f lfYf lRfiff4iff*ff111ffiTRflf#F11Tf 4#T+f1#if#+if#ifTf#Rf+ fR1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~~ iii Yeaz 2025 - with protect- ATVe Aug 29, 2009 17 25 11 Page 13=1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - AM _______________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) fiff11kt1f/iftit*#ff1f1f1t}ffli}ff4ffltf#ifftfii1f 1t4}tii}ff**iffff tf **11ff **tf* Intersection #12 Haven Avenue/I-1C Westbound Ramps It ifk4ff}tf lf *f111fffkfff111f1flfRtiflfftltf1f11f1f*ftf lf*111 tf 1f 11111 1111111iff Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 848 4 (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 21 3 Loss Time (sec) C Optimal Cycle 62 Level Of Service , *llfifffllfifft+fiflf}f*f*ff1f11f*lflfffiitfifflff**f 1f 1f 1111 11t 1ffffif}fff*fifi Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L T R Control Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights Ignore Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ___________________________II______________________________I~_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 3143 283 0 2128 397 0 0 0 648 0 738 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 3143 283 0 2128 347 0 0 0 648 0 738 User Adl 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 00 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 0 3308 0 0 2290 365 0 0 0 682 0 777 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 0 3308 0 0 2290 365 0 0 0 682 0 777 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adl 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 0 3308 0 0 2240 365 0 0 0 682 0 7771 ___________________________I'_____________________________________________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 D 95 Lanes 0 00 4 00 1 00 0 00 9 00 1 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 00 0 00 2 OD Final Sat 0 7600 1900 0 7600 1900 0 0 0 1800 0 36001 ___________________________I______________________________I______________ Capacity Analysis Module VO1/Sat 0 00 0 44 0 00 0 00 0 29 0 19 0 00 0 00 0 00 0**8 0 00 0 22 Crit Moves *fff Green Time 0 0 51 3 0 0 0 0 51 3 51 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 7 0 0 44 7 Volume/Cap 0 00 0 85 0 00 0 00 0 57 0 37 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 85 0 00 0 98 Delay/Veh 0 0 22 9 0 0 0 0 17 0 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 0 0 19 7 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad3De1/Veh 0 0 22 9 0 0 0 0 17 0 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 0 0 19 7 HCM2kAVg 0 24 0 0 12 7 0 0 0 21 0 9 *i1f11fif1fl.ff*itff.lf*.11111.:(.ff*.+111111.fff+fw.ffrilw*fii}.111111 llfff+.lf Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA C ~D /aa • Year 2025 - with project- PTUe Aug 29, 2009 17 27 21 Page 2-1 Hagen/Arrow C ity of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Protect Con ______ ditions - PM __________________ _____ __ ____________ _____ ____________ Level O ___________ £ Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) f#l114.11+#f f#f 4f 4##4f#.4f#44 !11#fff#1111!..## ff#4...fff if #f.f.fff.lf f lff.f #1111 Intersection #1 H ermosa Avenue/Arrow Route 1#4 1##4441!!!1###41l1 4!!!l f#f41f 1f 111 111f14111fa+ f afa1 4!411444!#44 +4#4111111l11l Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 803 Loss Time (sec) 8 IY+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 30 4 Optimal Cycle 66 Level O f Service f C 11!1 11!!1 ff#1411#f4#f#f ##f#f#4#11#1 141#444#41l 1411!1 f fl4f#44f141 41#h4#fff l' f 1 Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound R Movement L - T - R L - T - R __ _______ L - T - R I_______________I L _____ T ______ ____I ____ Control ____ P ___________ rotected I______ Protected Protected Pr otecte d Rights Include Include Include Includ e 0 Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 Lanes __ ____ ___________' _______________' _______________ ~_____ ______ ____I __________ Volume Module 153 348 296 91 174 30 85 1232 114 229 1134 101 Base Vol 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 153 398 296 91 179 30 85 1232 114 229 1134 101 Initial Bse 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User AdJ 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Ad] lume F V 161 366 312 96 183 32 89 1297 120 241 1194 106 o PH Redact Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 1297 120 0 241 0 1194 0 106 d Vol d 161 366 312 96 183 32 uce Re 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PCE Ad] 1 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] Final Vol 161 ____ 366 312 ___________ 96 183 32 _______________I 89 1297 120 _______________I 241 _____ 1194 ______ 106 ____ ____________ Saturation Flow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Adz ustment 1 00 92 1 08 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 83 0 17 1 00 1 84 0 16 Lanes Final Sat 1800 ____ , 2053 1747 __________II 1800 1900 1900 _______________ 1800 3478 322 I_______________ 1800 I_____ 3489 ______ 311 ____ ____________ Capacity Anal _ ysis Module 0 37 3 0 0 34 0 34 l/Sat V 0 09 0 18 0 18 0 OS 0 10 0 02 7 0 OS 0 1± o #1f # M Crit Moves 4441 22 2 22 2 f 6 6 15 0 15 0 8 0 46 5 46 9 16 7 55 1 55 1 Green Time 13 9 0 80 0 80 0 80 0 64 0 11 0 62 0 80 0 80 0 80 0 62 0 62 Volume/Cap 0 64 52 6 25 6 26 6 54 4 15 9 15 9 Delay/Veh 46 4 42 4 42 9 77 1 46 0 36 9 er DelAdJ U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 s Ad]Del/Veh 96 4 42 4 92 9 77 1 45 0 36 9 52 6 25 6 28 6 54 4 15 9 15 9 14 6 12 12 5 6 1 4 20 20 9 14 HCM2kAVg 4 1..11 11#. #.##.#.# +f1##4.#441#aflf #.###1f .f .111w1#4f+1#ff f. 1.1# .f#1# r4#4..f#1.#1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~~ l 23 Year 2025 - with pro]ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 27 21 _------------Page 3=1 Haven/Arrow Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro3ect Conditions - PM ______________ _________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternatrve) 1#f#r}fRrf#fff}f#f"r#1r41fk1ffffl#}1f1f1ff##rflf#r#f#!f#f #ff lft4rf#f#r}fkR1rR}1f Intersection N2 Center Avenue/Arrow Route 1111111411#1ff#f#f#f#1rf1f#1ffflf#rffrff#ra#fff#1f#f #1f 4}#1111#rf r#f r#11f111r1f# Average Delay (sec/veh) 186 1 Worst Case Level Of Service F[4826.11 irlf rf"1411}f##r"111"ltfrf#rff##ff#flrlff#"ffifff4R if#ff#fklf#ff#11111#lfYffl}f• North Hound South Hound East Bound west Sound Approach Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I_______________ _____ ________p___g___________________ I_____________ Control Stop Srgn Hto Sr n Uncontrolled Uncontrolled include Include Include Include Rights Lanes 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 O ____________I______________________________I_______________II_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 66 0 36 33 0 18 40 1500 53 109 1513 41 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtial Bse 66 0 36 33 0 18 40 1500 53 109 1513 41 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad) 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0.95 PHF Volume 69 0 38 35 0 19 42 1579 56 1150 15930 40 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 69 0 38 35 0 19 92 1579 56 115 1593 43 _I_______________ ____________I_______________I_______________I______________ Critical Gap Module 4 1 xxxx xxxxx Crrtical Gp 7 5 xxxx 6 9 7 5 xxxx 6 9 4 1 xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim 3 5 xxxx 3 3 3 5 xxxx 3 3 2 2 xxxx xxxxx 2 2 xxxx xxx~ ____________I_______________'I_____________________________________________ Capacity Module Cnflrct Vol 2717 xxxx 817 2717 xxxx 818 1636 xxxx xxxxx 1402 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap 10 xxxx 324 10 xxxx 323 402 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap 7 xxxx 324 6 xxxx 323 402 xxxx xxxxx 402 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap 10 06 xxxx 0 12 5 37 xxxx 0 06 0 10 xxxx xxxx 0 29 xxxx xxxx ___________________________II______________________________I_______________ Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx ~~ xxxxx xxxx '~~ 0 3 xxxx xxxxx 1 2 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx*cx xxxxx 15 0 xx'cx xxxxx 17 5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move " " * " C C Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx 11 xxxxx xxxx 10 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx 14 8 xxxxx xxxxx 8 0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel xxxxx 4826 xxxxx xxxxx 2737 xxxxx xxx4cx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1 p " F " " Shared LOS xxxxxx ApproachDel 9826 1 2737 2 xxxxxx f ApproachLOS F F Traff lx 7 6 0715 lc) 2003 Dowling Assoc Lrcensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ gay • Year 2025 - with protect- PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 27 21 Page 4-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection N3 Residential Access/Arrow Route Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 1 Worst Case Level Of Service C[ 16 51 Approach North Hound South Hound East Hound w est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L __________________ - T - R ___________I ___ _I_______________~________________ Control Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Un controlled Rights Include Include Include Include - 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Lanes ___I_________________________________________________ ___________) _________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1506 27 0 1662 0 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Inrtral Bse 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1506 27 0 1662 0 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 96 0 95 0 95 PHF Ad 0 95 0 95 l PHF Volume 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1585 2H 0 1799 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1585 2H 0 I_______________I___ 1749 0 ________________ __ Critical Gap Module . Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx %XXXX x~cx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ____I_______________'_______________I___________________ xrzxx ~~ ___________I ________ Capacity Module Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx 807 xxx< xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x~cx ~~ ~~ Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 329 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ~ocxx xx~cx X Move Cap xxxx xxxx 329 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 OS xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XX~ x~ocx _______________I______________________________I____ ~~ ~~ -__________I ____________ Level Of Service Module Queue xxxxx xxxx 0 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 16 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx * xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move * * C * + + * Movement LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx~cxx xx~cx xx:cx X Sha red4ueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x~ocxx X xrzxx ~~ Shrd S[pDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx X x~oocx + * ~~ ~~ + Shared LOS * ' ' ApproachDel 16 5 xxxxxx xxxxxx X X ApproachLOS C " Traffix 7 6 0715 (C) 2003 Dowling AsSOC Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~~ ~~ • Year 2025 - with prof ect- PTue Aug 24, 2004 17 27 21 Page 5-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - PM _________________________ ____________________________________ Level Of Se rvrce Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalrzed Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1f 1f f 1 ffiflff 1111+1f f11111ffff1f1111 ff'kf 11f111tt1t+ff iffif iif1f wff+lf kfflfllfxf l Intersection #t4 Commercial Access/Arrow Route lf11111f 111f11111!l if ffffkf11f 1ff 4f1ff11fIf111ffif •f ifiifff1f 11fffifkfflffiffflf D( 28 6] 1 5 Worst Case e Delay (sec/veh) ra A Level Of Service 11111 1tf 1111 ve g flf}flffiffffiff11fk1ffflf#fff11ff1ffff1f11ff 111!1!!!}1! 1f 11 f1111ffi North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Approach - - T- R T R L L T R L T R - Movement L :_I __ __ I_______________II _______________I _____ 9 I_______ _____II______P_ Stop Sign Sto Si n Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control Include Include Include Include Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 - -I---------------II---------------I I---------------I I---------------I --------- Volume Module 0 0 0 1513 9 0 1627 0 Base Vol 0 0 175 0 00 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 1 00 1 0 Growth Adz 1 0 0 0 0 1513 9 0 0 162 Initial Bse 0 0 175 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Ad] 1 00 1 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 99 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 0 0 0 0 1593 9 0 1713 0 0 0 184 PHF Volume 0 0 0 0 0 p Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1593 9 0 1713 ~ Frnal Vol 0 0 184 II_______________I ______________ _______-______ _I • I______________ _ Critical Gap Module xxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ Crrtrcal Gp xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x x xxxxx xxxxx ~~ ~~ Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ____I_______________II_______________I xxxxx xxx I_______________I I_______________I ________ Capacity Module xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx BO1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx 332 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxxx ~~ ~~ ~~ Move Cap xxxx xxxx 332 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx 0 56 xxxx xxxx xxxx _______________II_______________I xxxx xxx I_______________I I_______________ ____________I Level Of Service Module xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx 3 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx cx xxxxx cx cx xxx cx xx xxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx 28 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxycx xx* ' e * LOS by Move f D LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared0ueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x xx xxxx xxxxx cx xxxx xxxxx xxx Shrd S[pDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x f xx * f Shared LOS * 1 xxxxxx ApproachDel 28 6 xxxxxx xxxx.cx , ApproachLOS D Trafflx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA e~D /~6 year 2025 - with pro? ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2009 17 27 21 Page 6=1 _________________________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 Wieh Project Conditions - PM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) wr.k~r~a.~~w•rw~~+~~~~tr~~~~»rii+~~r~R+x+iR ~~it.~~~~~rRxtt»~rt~~:i~r~~~~~ai+~~tt• Intersection #6 Haven Avenue/Baseline Road Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 899 Loss Time (sec) a (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 34'0 Optimal Cycle 100 Level Of Service t+a~sr~i+rwiM~r»r~~~~~+~~••:+.~~~•+~x»~rir~~~~~~~»~MM••k ~~~~~~~~+~~~a~+~~~~ Approach North Hound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R _____ _ ____II_____________ _______________'_______________~ __________ __ Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include include Include Include Mrn Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ____________I_______________~_______________II______________________________ Volume Module Base Vol 406 1809 144 221 1121 165 949 853 266 133 586 198 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 406 1809 144 221 1121 165 949 853 266 133 586 198 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 96 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 427 1904 152 233 1180 174 973 898 280 140 617 208 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 427 1904 152 233 1180 174 473 898 280 190 617 208 PC£ Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 927 1904 152 233 1180 179 473 898 280 190 617 208 ___________________________I_____________________________________________ Saturaeion Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 62 0 38 1 00 2 00 1 00 1 00 2 00 1 00 Final Sat 3400 5700 1900 3400 9969 731 1800 3800 1900 1800 3800 1900 ___________________________I_______________I_______________I_______________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 13 0 33 0 08 0 07 0 29 0 24 0 26 0 24 0 15 0 08 0 16 0 11 Cr1t Moves " " Green Time 15 5 37 1 37 1 7 6 29 3 29 3 29 2 35 5 35 5 11 7 18 0 18 0 Volume/Cap 0 81 0 90 0 21 0 90 0 81 0 81 0 90 0 66 0 91 0 66 0 90 0 61 Delay/Veh 50 1 35 3 21 6 76 8 35 9 35 9 52 3 28 5 24 B SO 1 54 9 40 9 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/veh 50 1 35 3 21 6 76 8 35 9 35 9 52 3 28 5 24 8 SO 1 59 9 40 9 HCM2kAVg 9 22 3 6 15 15 18 12 7 5 13 7 •xai~~~~+~+~.r+'*a+~~~:i~~~~r~aw~rr++~•M•rxr~~•*+:r~~~++i•++i~x~+~+r•~+z •r.+~~~~MM+ Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ c ~'~ ~a~ Year 2025 - with pro]ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2009 17 ________________________ 27 21 _________________ _____ Page 7-1 ____________ _________________ _____ Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 202 5 With Project Con _________ ditions - PM _________________ _____ ____________ _________________ ___________ Level _________ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternative) 11411 i}114+kf4f1* 1f 41+44}!+! #444}f4Y4}44411+k4 444*}f4}4}4f1f414fif4i ff41#}441*}} Intersection #6 H aven Avenue /Foothill Boulevar d f4}ff1141f*1f1f4f +f4flf*+f1f f*+xf*+*f4#1+14111 #1114*f441ff441f4 1++44 +4+41k+4111} Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 1 018 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 52 1 Optimal Cycle 180 Level O f Service ~ D +4144* f*f*1414#4414}*4f *4++1444#14 +11}4+11!1#44111 i4 44f14f4*R1+ +1114*f 14++ #*+11l Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ________1 L - T - R ______________I 1_ L ____ - T - R ___________I _ ____I____ Control P ___________ rotected 11_______ Protected Protected P rotected Rights include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 Lanes Volume Module Base Vol 384 1898 295 271 879 95 556 1319 259 3B4 992 352 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Sse 384 1898 295 271 879 95 556 1319 259 384 992 352 1 00 er Ad U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ] s 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz PHF Volume 404 1945 311 285 925 100 585 1388 273 409 1044 371 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 904 1995 311 285 925 100 585 1388 273 409 1044 371 PCE Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 409 1_____ 1995 311 __________ 285 925 100 I_______________j 585 1388 273 j_______________11 404 ____ 1044 371 ___________1 ____________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 t 0 B9 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Ad]ustmen 2 00 3 45 0 55 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 1 67 0 33 2 00 3 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3400 6554 1046 3900 5700 1900 3400 3176 624 3400 5700 1900 Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 12 0 30 0 30 0 OB 0 16 0 OS 0 17 0 44 0 44 0 12 0 18 0 20 Crit Moves 5 8 ***• 29 2 29 2 ++#1 8 2 21 6 21 6 }141 25 6 42 9 42 9 ++44 11 7 29 D 29 0 Green Time 1 75 1 02 1 02 1 02 0 7S 0 24 0 67 1 02 1 02 1 02 0 63 G 67 Volume/Cap 0 Delay/Veh 96 1 59 2 59 2 104 9 39 4 32 8 35 5 55 5 55 5 94 0 31 7 34 6 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 96 1 59 2 59 2 104 4 39 4 32 8 35 5 55 5 55 5 99 0 31 7 34 6 HCM2kAvg 8 25 25 8 11 3 9 34 34 11 10 11 44Rf41 h+4f*1+4444# 4114*Rk44*# 11x4#4if**f4f 414+f 4**k4R*4*4*##4}+* 444k44414i441*f4 Traf £ix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~~ /emu Year 2025 - with protect- PTUe Aug 24, 2009 17 ___________________________ 27 21 ______ Page 8-1 __________ _________________ __ Haven/Arrow City of Fanch o Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Protect Con _________ __ ditions - PM __________________ ____ ____________ _________________ ____________ Level O _____ _ f Servue Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operati ons Method (Base Volume Alternative) 411#f11x 4441!ifl! !4l11T11fwf1 1wa1x4+##i#!T••ff x4f#1+41+wT1T4f44!#1f 1 T4##w1l if 111 Intersection #7 H aven Avenue/ Arrow Route 41fwi!!#T4fiixfxf #fTx!#f11ff# 1441#f 4a4fxilifif wfli4#f!#1x4Tf #4!1411! if 1xwilai#f! Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap 1X1 0 936 Loss Time (sec) B (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 42'5 Optimal Cycle 123 Level Of Service D !4 f4f #fi4##44fix#1f 41411141411# 4141#f4*w!#xi#fll R 1x44#h 1f##1tf 44}x44#f iRlMf 14111 Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound W es[ Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ___________ L - T - R ~_______________~ L I____ - T - R ___________I _____I____ Control P ___________I rotected ____ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 Lanes _______ ___________I ~_______________I I_______________ ____ ___________~ _________ Volume Module Base Vol 489 1870 375 87 1261 271 953 1136 182 331 885 198 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 489 1870 375 87 1261 271 953 1136 182 331 885 148 User AdJ 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 515 1968 395 92 1327 285 477 1196 192 348 932 156 Reduct Vol 0 l 515 0 0 1968 395 0 0 0 92 1327 285 0 0 0 477 1196 192 0 398 0 0 932 156 Reduced Vo PCE AdJ 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 J Final Vol 515 _____ 1968 395 __________ 92 1327 285 _______________ 477 1196 192 _______________ 348 ____ 932 156 ___________~ ____________I Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adtustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 47 0 53 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 1 71 0 29 Lanes Final Sat 3400 _____ 5700 1900 __________I 3900 9692 1008 _______________I 3900 3800 1900 _______________ 3400 ____ 3256 549 ___________I ____________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 15 0 35 0 21 0 03 0 28 0 28 0 14 0 31 0 10 +4. 0 10 0 29 0 29 1141 Crit Moves 1'•` 16 2 93 1 43 1 +Tf, 3 9 30 2 30 2 f 15 0 39 9 34 4 11 2 30 6 30 6 Green Time Volume/Cap 0 94 0 80 0 48 0 80 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 92 0 29 0 92 0 94 0 94 Delay/Veh 69 9 26 7 20 9 80 0 44 0 49 0 66 8 91 6 24 2 70 1 47 4 97 4 User DelAdt 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 AdJ Del/Veh 69 9 26 7 20 9 80 0 44 0 44 0 66 8 41 6 24 2 70 1 47 4 47 4 HCM2kAvg 12 19 9 3 21 21 11 22 9 9 21 21 1111x1#1TTlf4Tx4#1 1R#1T#f#T##T l1T4f#4fT444fx#44T4Txx#4xTixlxxx#f xlfi fTxlf1ff411f Traffix 7 6 0775 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ C~D ~a9 Year 2025 - with pro3ect- PTUe Aug 29, 2009 17 27 21 Page 9=1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 with Project Conditions - PM ______________ _ _____ __________ _______________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternativ e) f }f 4Rf ##I#1faiYf#iflff4#}4#4faf4**k44k}4#f 1#**1f *f4#f 4# 4*41t*f4#1 *11#f a#f#411f4f Intersection #S Haven Avenue/Commercial Access 14#1fa:41af4aaf4a#f#f aff lff 1141 144!!}1 1*f 441141 r}f 4a44#*4af**f 44111!14}41#14l111 B[ l4 9j sec/veh) 0 2 worst Case Level Of Service e Delay A 1#14! 11*}4* verag 1f4fa1*1411##1#411#f4*f11k4*f1a1f1*i114#f1#f*f1af 1111#14 !1144 ik#1141} North Bound South Hound East Bound west Hound Approach R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement L - T - _______I _ ____________~I______ _______________ p _______________ 9 Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n Stop Sign Control Include include Include Include Rights 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 3 0 0 ___________________I_______________II_______________ _______________ ________ Volume Module 0 0 1763 30 0 0 59 0 0 0 Base Vol 0 2719 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 0 59 0 0 0 Initial Bse 0 2719 0 0 1763 30 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 95 0 99 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adl 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume 0 2862 0 0 1856 32 0 0 62 0 0 0 Reduot VO1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 O Final Vol 0 2862 0 0 1896 32 0 I Critical Gap Module xxx 6 9 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx~ocx n~ocx x:cxxx xxxxx x 3 3 x xxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx~cx x~ocx xxxXx '~~ ~ocxx ____~_______________I~______________________________ _______________ ________ Capacity Module 634 xxX xxxxx xxXX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXx x xxXx ~~ ~~ ~X 426 xxxX xxxx XXX~ PotenC Cap xxxX ~ocxx ~~ X~ Cx ~~ X xXxx ~ocxx 426 xxxx Xxxx xXxxx Move Cap %XXX ~X x~oocx xJV x~cx Xxxx xxx~c x~cxx 0 15 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx x ______________________________I _______________ _______________~ ____________ Level Of Service Module 0 5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x x 'Y 14 9 x ` xxx cx ~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ; * Stopped Del xxxxX xx.~cx xxxxx x~oocx x ~ ~ , 1 B 1 LOS by Move LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT T LT - LTR - RT - Movement L x xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x~c ~cxxxx ~~ xx~cx ~~ Shared4ueue xxxxx ~~ " xxxxx xxxx X ~~ xx c x~cxxx ~ xx c xxrz c cx xx. xxx. ~ Shrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx X ~~ ~~ ~ k a 4 ~ ~ * 1 Shared LOS 4 a 14 9 ocxxx Xx ApproachDel x~ooocx x~ 1 ApproachLOS H Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling ASSOC Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA C ~D l3d 2004 17 27 21 24 Au PT Page 10-1 , g Ue Year 2025 - with project- __________________________________ ______________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - PM ____________________ _____________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Repor[ 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1!111# *}f*Rf*ff1*f*f11f11tf*4!111#!**ff#1!111*f4f*ffff**fkf if if 11 +*ffAfiff*1f*ff Intersection #9 Haven Avenue/26th Street #11!!!*11f*1**k1f*11#1f*#111 *ff 1!!111 11#111!1#11 *t 1f*f*ff**f*1111#!f#111!1#111 1* C[ 15 91 worst Case Level Of Service Average Delay (sec/veh) 0 2 ff*f 111111 rf 11!11! 1~#11111 1x1111111*1f#11x 111!1#1111*+l 11!11!!1!!#1#111*1f.a1f11 nd B North Hound South Bound East Hound Approach ou West L - T - R Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____ ___ _____ ____ ___ ______ 9 P ____________I_______________ Control Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n g p Sto Si n Include Include Include Include Rights 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 __~_____________________________________________ _______________I __________ Volume Module 0 0 72 0 0 0 Base Vol 0 2719 0 0 1802 20 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 72 0 0 0 Initial Bse 0 2719 0 0 1802 20 0 0 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 76 0 0 0 PHF Volume 0 2862 0 0 1897 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 76 0 0 O Final Vol 0 2862 0 0 1897 21 _____ Critical Gap Module 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Crita cal Gp xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx _____'_______________I______________________________ _____________ _______ Capacity Module xxxxx xxxx xxxx 693 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnf lict Vol xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 921 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 421 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx Move Cap xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 18 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x ________________I_______________I_______________ _______________ ___________ Level Of Se Nice Module 0 6 xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x.xxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx xxcx xxxxx xxxx 15 4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x 1 C * « LOS by Move 1 * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x cx xxx Cx xx x x x xx~cx xxx xxx , * R Bhrd StpDel xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxicx xx + . Shared LOS 1 f * 15 4 x~ xx~cxxx ApproachDel xxxxxx x" * * C 1 ApproachLOS Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA u C~D l3/ • Year 202_ - with protect- PTUe Aug 24, 2009 17 27 21 Page 11-1 Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 Kith Protect Conditions - PM _______________ Level Of Service Computation Repor[ 2000 HCM Operations Me[hod (Base Volume Alternative) f#ffkf#if##kllirtif 1111f1Rf#lrt4iflf###iifilflii##ifkfl4rtfi#rtllf!!i#rtYfrtf###fiff#k Intersection #10 Haven Avenue/6th Street llif#lflf+lffl11111f1fif11f•#lfff!#l:1f1flf!!flif1f 1111 1iilf 1ll1f1if 1#01929!!11! Cycle (sec) 100 Critical vol /Cap (X) 6 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 30 8 Loss Time (sec) C Optimal Cycle 109 Level Of Service , !!f #ff if#!!f #1111+ililf#f#lffiif.lf!!f!f##aifff##f firifllf#i#iff#af##fi#f+!###!# North Hound Sou[h Hound East Hound West Bound Approach Movement L - T - T - R L - T - R L - T - R __I______________________________ _ __~_____________R_~_____________ Control Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Include Include Include Rights Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module Base Vol 105 2139 309 229 1796 78 89 426 108 262 321 113 Growth Adt 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 1100 1100 1300 1200 1700 1 00 1 00 1400 1100 1200 1300 1100 User Ad] PHF Ad] 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 99 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 111 2252 325 291 1891 79 94 948 114 276 338 119 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 111 2252 325 291 1891 79 94 448 114 276 338 119 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 DO 1 00 Final Vol 111 2252 325 241 1891 79 94 448 114 276 338 1191 __________________________________________I_______________~_______________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad]ustment 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Lanes 1 00 2 62 0 38 2 00 2 88 0 12 0 14 0 69 0 17 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Sat 1800 4981 719 3400 5472 228 271 1299 329 1800 1900 19001 ____________I_______________~_____________________________________________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 06 0 95 0 45 Oi0* 0 35 0 35 0 35 0 35 0 35 0 15 0 18 0 06 111i 1fi1 Cnt Moves Green Time 8 5 49 0 99 0 7 7 48 1 98 1 37 4 37 4 37 4 37 9 37 4 37 4 Volume/Cap 0 72 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 72 0 72 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 91 0 48 0 17 Delay/Veh 59 7 29 6 29 6 81 7 21 5 21 5 97 7 47 7 97 7 23 6 24 4 21 0 User DelAdJ 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 AdJDel/Veh 59 7 29 6 29 6 81 7 2175 2175 4247 4247 4247 2366 2484 2120 HCM2kAvg 5 29 29 7 111.!#!f#lfli.iifl+f+1f1i1iiili.l+i#i1.+1#i1f#f1.rt#1rti1f1f 1++1+##1f #1i#lif if11f1 Trafflx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • Year 2025 - with pro]ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 27 21 Page 12=1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 202 5 Wrth Pro]ect Con _______ ditions - PM _________________ ______ _______ _________________ ___________ Level ___________ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat rons Method (Base Volume Alternativ e) i#ii##flilil##### I#+TIIi ilii ll#1111TiT##a#11## r111+11#+iT#ii1#a 1#iir1 1#I##+ii### Intersection #11 Haven Avenu e/9th Street 1ii11## #IiT#i1+w11Ti11#i 1TIi11 1#i1##i 111# i#ii1+1#ii+1#11## i#TiT##i1Ti i 1##i1T#i1T (sec) l C 100 Critica l vol /Cap (X) 1 191 yc e e (sec) T 8 IY#R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 95 P rm Loss Optimal Cycle 180 Level O f Service 1 1#I II+i111r +11+11+1x1+11+1 11++1111111 +11#+11+#1111#II++ 1x11+1 +IIIIi 11+1 111111 Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ___________ L - T - R _______________~ L _____ T R __________I _____ I____ Control P __ _________ rotected I____ Protected Protected Pr otected Include Include include Include Rrghts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mrn Green 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes 2 __I____ 0 2 1 0 ___________ 2 I_______________ I_______________ _____ __________ __________ Volume Module 170 2094 198 266 1753 177 313 1397 266 221 885 194 Base Vol 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Ad] Initial Bse 170 2099 198 266 1753 177 313 1397 266 221 885 194 1 00 User Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 a 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 99 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz lume 179 V 2209 208 280 1845 186 329 1971 280 233 932 204 • o pHF Reduct Vol 0 79 0 0 2204 208 0 0 0 280 1895 186 0 0 0 329 1971 280 0 233 0 0 932 204 Reduced Vol 1 1 00 1 00 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad] Final Vol 179 2204 208 280 1845 186 329 1971 280 233 932 204 Saturation Flow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 0 89 100 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Adz ustment 2 00 2 79 0 26 2 00 2 72 0 28 1 00 1 68 0 32 1 00 1 64 0 36 Lanes Final Sat 3400 ____ 5208 492 ___________ 3900 5177 523 _______________ 1800 3192 608 _______________ 1800 I_____ 3117 683 __________ ____________ Capacrty Analysis Module 6 0 0 30 0 30 Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 42 0 92 0 08 0 36 0 36 1#+' 0 18 0 46 0 9 IT Ty; Crit Moves 5 5 "** 35 5 35 5 6 9 37 0 37 0 18 8 38 7 38 7 10 9 30 7 30 7 Green Time 0 96 1 19 1 19 1 19 0 96 0 96 0 97 1 19 1 19 1 19 0 97 0 97 Volume/Cap 102 3 123 123 3 166 6 43 0 93 0 81 8 124 123 6 169 8 54 2 59 2 Delay/Veh 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAd] 1 102 3 123 123 3 166 6 93 0 43 0 81 8 124 723 6 169 8 54 2 54 2 Ad]Del/Veh 6 93 43 10 26 26 15 47 47 15 23 23 HCM2kAVg Tkill#+1#+ #1T4YT14#i1##i4TT #4+1#+1T##11#+1#i TT##11 #Ti1#i11RT# #ITTi1f1i1#i+1+1#i i Trafflx 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Lrcensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • ~~~, ~,~3 Year 2025 - with pro? ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 27 21 Page 13-1 • Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro]ect Conditions - PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) #fti4if#tt#f 1f ##1kif 1R 1111#ft#}1f##t}11111#1f#ffiff 1!111#fi#l ltlfitf #Itif #k #f##f Intersection #12 Haven Avenue/I-10 westbound Ramps t1f1.1..ft#ff#1fit1fff111ft1.#+111#1ff+1#1t1#f#f##lf if l.tftf#if1#ff tfllf#llfaff# Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 659 Loss Time (sec) 4 (Y.R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 9_6 Optimal Cycle 32 Level Of Service A #1t4f41#t#i}f}ftltii lff1f14114t#f###}11141##tf#ltkff#ff lff#1#f1i1t1#ilffiff##11# Approach North Hound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R _____I_______________I_______________I___p___________I ____________I__________ Control Permitted Permitted Spli[ Phase S lit Phase Rights Ignore Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ____________I_______________I_______________I_______________~_______________ Volume Module Base Vol 0 3408 477 0 2483 1038 0 0 0 275 0 359 Gzowth Ad] 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 0 3408 977 0 2983 1038 0 0 0 275 0 354 User Adz 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adl 0 95 0 95 0 00 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 0 3587 0 0 2619 1093 0 0 0 289 0 373 . Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 0 3587 0 0 2614 1093 0 0 0 289 0 373 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adl 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 0 3587 0 0 2614 1093 0 0 0 289 0 373 Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad]ustment 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 0 95 Lanes 0 00 4 00 1 00 0 00 3 53 1 47 0 00 0 00 0 00 1 00 0 00 2 00 Final Sat 0 7600 1900 0 6699 2801 0 0 0 1800 0 3600 ____________~_______________I~_______________II______________________________I Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 00 0 47 0 00 0 00 0 39 0 39 0 00 0 00 0 00 Of*6 0 00 0 10 Crit Moves ii}+ Green T1 me 0 0 71 6 0 0 0 0 71 6 71 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 29 4 Volume/Cap 0 00 0 66 0 00 0 00 0 54 0 54 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 66 0 00 0 92 Delay/Veh 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 0 6 7 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 7 0 0 32 2 User DelAd] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 , Ad]Del/Veh 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 0 6 7 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 7 0 0 32 2 HCM2kAvg 0 15 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 9 0 5 ff#i11tf#11k#f#ff#11fR11#f#f###14if11ff1ff#f1if41f1t 1####tfff #1ff##tY4if#1f 1f 1f# Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA . C~D i3y • YEAR 2005 WITH PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS 824/04(R LLER'43 i ~7affic~Zone Change Leter apd) C~~ t3S Opening Year with project-ATue Aug 27, 2004 17 29 OB Page 2-1 ____________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Year With Project Conditions - AM ________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa•aaaaaaaxaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaraaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa Intersection #2 Center Avenue/Arrow Route aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa•aaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 419 LOSS Time (Sec) 6 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 9' 9 Optimal Cycle 24 Level Of Service A as as aaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaa+aaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Approach North Bound South Hound East Bound west Hound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L T A _________ ____________________~~_______________I Control Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module Base Vol 61 1 46 52 2 37 19 940 19 99 731 10 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 61 1 96 52 2 37 14 940 19 44 731 10 User Adj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adj 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 PHF Volume 68 1 51 58 2 91 16 1050 21 49 817 11 Redact Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 68 1 51 58 2 41 16 1050 21 49 817 11 PCE Adj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 68 1 51 58 2 41 16 1050 21 99 817 11 ___________________________~______________________________I_______________I Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adz ustment 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 99 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 Lanes 0 56 0 O1 0 43 0 57 0 02 0 41 1 00 1 96 0 04 1 00 1 97 0 03 Final Sat 1017 17 767 1029 40 732 1700 3529 71 1700 3551 49 __________________________________________II_______________~_______________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 07 0 07 0 07 0 06 0 06 0 06 0 O1 0 30 0 30 0 03 0 23 0 23 aaa. aaaa aaaa Crit Moves Green Time 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 3 0 71 1 71 1 6 9 75 0 76 0 Volume/Cap 0 42 0 42 0 42 0 35 0 35 0 35 0 31 0 42 0 42 0 42 0 31 0 31 Delay/Veh 38 8 38 8 38 8 38 1 38 1 38 1 50 9 6 1 6 1 47 0 4 1 9 1 User DelAdj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adz Del/Veh 38 8 38 8 38 8 38 1 38 1 38 1 50 9 6 1 6 1 47 0 4 1 4 1 HCM2kAvg 9 3 9 3 3 3 1 7 7 2 4 4 aaaaaaa+aaaaaaa+aaaraaaaaaa+aaaaaxaaaaaaaaaaaaa+aa.aaaaaaaaaraa+aaaaa aaaa as aaaaa Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling A55oc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~Q !36 Year-with project-PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 29 07 Page 2-1 Openrng __ ___________ __________________ ________________ _______________ Haven/Arrow C ity of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Opening Ye ar With Project C __________________ onditrons - PM _______________ _________________ ___________ Level Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternatrve) 11R flf 11 tf4fIf11R11f f1if1111t1f lRlfiflf111fiiif11 11fi1tfiFf if}f#fi!}fiR1f4f 1RI}f Zntersec[ion #2 Center Avenu e/Arrow Route i 111111f1f1f111 11f'R if iff lfll Rff iiff f1 s flf}1111 fif ftfffffflR1ff1411f 111 (sec) Cycle 100 Crrtica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 463 10'5 (sec) 6 (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) Loss Time 25 Level O f Servrce H Optimal Cycle f11}f 11f 111i11f11f 111i 111! 1111!}f i11f}lfaffl}w11 ff111 f11R111 11f111i1ffffflif 1 1f1 th Bound S East Sound W est Bound No Approach rth Hound ou R L _ _ T R Movement L - R - T - T- R L _____ _____ _ L T I_______________ ____ ___________ _ ____ ___ I ___________ Permrtted I_____ Permitted Protected Protected Control Include Include Include Include Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mln Green 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes 0 ____I____ 0 1' 0 0 ___________ 0 I_______________I I_______________ ____ ___________I ________ Volume Module 36 33 0 18 90 1049 53 109 1053 41 Hase Vol 66 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 00 1 0 36 33 0 18 40 1049 53 109 1053 41 Znitial Bse 66 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 00 98 1 0 98 0 98 0 9B 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 9B 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 PHF Ad) 0 0 37 34 0 18 41 1069 59 111 1073 42 PHF Volume 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 37 0 0 39 0 1B 91 1069 54 111 1073 42 Reduced Vol 67 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 0 37 34 0 18 41 1069 54 111 1073 42 Frnal Vol 67 ____ ___________ _______________ _______________ ____ I ___________ ____________I Saturation Flow Module 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Sat/Lane 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 0 94 1 00 1 00 Ad)ustment 1 65 0 00 0 35 0 65 0 00 0 35 1 00 1 90 0 10 1 00 1 93 0 07 Lanes 0 1165 0 635 1165 0 635 1700 3427 173 1700 3465 135 Final Sat ___ ___________ I_______________ _______________ '____ 1 ___________ _____________ Capacity Analysis Module 03 0 31 0 02 O 0 0 0 31 0 31 0 06 0 00 0 06 0 03 0 00 0 ** 7 Vol/Sat f 1 Crit Maves 1Tf1 2 5 12 5 0 0 12 5 5 9 67 4 67 4 19 1 75 7 75 7 Green Time 12 5 0 0 1 96 0 23 0 00 0 23 0 41 0 46 0 46 0 46 0 91 0 41 Volume/Cap 0 96 0 00 0 7 9 90 9 4 4 9 9 Delay/Veh 92 2 0 0 92 2 40 0 0 0 40 0 48 1 7 9 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 9 4 4 Del/Veh 42 2 Ad 0 0 42 2 40 0 0 0 40 0 48 1 7 9 7 9 9 40 7 46 j 3 0 4 2 0 2 2 8 8 4 HCM2kAvg f11 f 111! 11!111! 11f a1f 1f111f 11f 11f 11111 +11a1 iff 11i111f}1 +1a11i1111111fi1+11a11ffr Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • C~D !37 YEAR 2025 WITH PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS C~ L~ S/24/04(R \LEW431\TraRc\Zone Change Letter ~~pd) / ~~D l~8 Year 2025 - with project- ATue Aug 24, 2004 17 29 50 Page 2-1 Haven/Arrow C ity of Rancho Cucamonga, San Hernardino County Year 2025 With Project Condiu ons - AM ___________________________ _____ _____ _________________ ____________ Level O ________ f Service Computa tion Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) f111k##1tf#+f#14f i#lf ltff#t#l tiff 4f111ff41#fkl ff#4141#if lt4ff##11114# f if 4#11 !14# Intersection #2 Center Avenue tflf#41ff4f#1f+ /Arrow Route f##++444ftff#tff# 4414441#frlf#f###1141#! 4f 41tfa ff4f 1111#4tftf#t## Cn tica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 410 Cycle (sec) (sec) T 100 6 (Y+R = 9 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 8 A 1me Loss Optimal Cycle 23 Level Of Service ~ fYf 44t4 f#ftf4t4f #f+f4# if#4Yf+f#4#R 11 }tft4#414ftt4## 4#f#1ft#4i#f 114##f##4f 4 ###t Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound we st Bound R Movement L - T - R L - T - R _ ______ L - T - R _______________ L _____ T _______ ___I ___________ ___ Control ___________I PermiCted ________ Permitted Protected Pr otected Include Include Include Include Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Green ~ 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes 0 _______ 0 1~ 0 0 ___________I 0 0 1 I_______________I _______________ _____ _______ ___ _________ Volume Module 61 1 46 52 2 37 14 1030 19 94 1136 10 Base Vol 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 L 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Growth Adz 1 46 52 2 37 14 1030 19 44 1136 10 Inltral Bse 61 1 00 1 DO 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 0 9H 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 64 1 48 55 2 39 15 1084 20 46 1196 11 PHF Volume Redact Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 0 0 0 15 1084 20 0 46 0 1196 0 11 Reduced Vol 64 1 48 00 1 00 55 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PCE Adl 1 00 1 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adj 1 00 1 00 1 98 55 2 39 15 1084 20 46 1196 11 Final Vol 64 ____ ___________I _______________ I_______________I I_____ _______ 1 ___ ____________ Saturation Flow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 900 Sat/Lane 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 98 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Adjustment 0 56 0 O1 0 43 0 57 0 02 0 91 1 00 1 96 0 09 1 00 1 98 0 02 Lanes 1073 18 809 1086 42 773 1900 3731 69 1800 3767 33 Final Sat Capacity Analysis Module 29 0 03 0 0 3 32 Vol/Sat 0 06 0 06 0 06 0 OS 0 OS 0 OS 0 O1 0 29 0 1 * Crit Moves 6 f#4f 14 6 14 6 14 6 19 6 19 6 f«## 2 0 72 9 72 9 6 5 77 4 7 7 4 Green Time 14 91 0 41 0 41 0 35 0 35 0 35 0 91 0 40 0 90 0 90 0 41 0 41 Volume/Cap 0 5 9 5 3 5 3 97 1 3 8 3 8 Delay/Veh 39 8 39 B 39 8 39 2 39 2 39 2 5 r DelAdj 1 00 U 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 se Adj Del/Veh 39 8 39 8 39 8 39 2 39 2 39 2 55 9 5 3 5 3 47 1 3 8 3 8 5 HCM2kAvg 9 3 4 1 3 3 3 #1111#1#114aas4f 1 7 6 2 44f4tff4#++..111 1x#!111 6 #+.###4 11#. •1141! 1f.1444#t1lf +wt+w4441f1 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA • C~0 /39 Year 2025 - with pro]ect- ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 ________________________ _ 29 50 _________________ _____ Page 3-1 ____________ ___________ _ _________ Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 202 5 With Pro]ect Conditions - AM _____________________________ _____ ____________ ___________ _________________ Level ______ Of Service Computa tion Report 2000 $CM Operat ions Method (Base Volume Alternativ e) f1*#f!4*fa* fw#f1w#ifklf#kf4f if1wf11f1f1faflflf ww*fIa#t*f #f #w4#f f#tff }f#f#af #1ff# Intersection #6 Haven Avenue /Foothill Boulevar d f##1f *#111f fwfff**fllf wf1f11 111f aw11111faf1faa aa wl rfalaff lf**f1 1fa#1 1fff 1ffw+lff Cycle (sec) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 698 ' Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 32 .2 Optimal Cycle 98 Level O f Service C aawwlwf#aw* awf lf#•#1f1faa1a1 f1faaa*11111f wf 11f aw wff•f•af if if#wl lfa wl #1f of 11#11!• Approach North Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ______ __ L - T - R _______________ L ____ - T - R ___________ ____ Control ________________ Protected I______ _ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 Lanes _ I_______________ II_______________~ I_______________ I____ ___________I ___________ Volume Module Base Vol 293 754 131 275 1523 174 230 598 263 338 971 122 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 OD 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 293 754 131 275 1523 174 230 598 263 338 971 122 User Ada 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 96 0 95 PHF Volume 308 799 138 289 1603 183 292 629 277 356 1022 128 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 308 799 138 289 1603 183 242 629 277 356 1022 128 PCE Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 308 794 138 ______________ 289 1603 183 _______________ 292 629 277 _______________~ 356 ____ 1022 128 ___________I ____________ Saturation F _ low Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad]ustmenG 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 2 00 3 41 0 59 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 3 00 1 00 Lanes Final Sat 3400 6475 1125 _____________~ 3400 5700 1900 _______________I 3400 3800 1900 _______________~~ 3400 ____ 5700 1900 ___________I ____________ Capacity Ana __ lysis Module Vol/Sat 0 09 0 12 0 12 0 09 0 28 0 10 0 07 0 17 0 15 0 10 *++* 0 18 0 07 Cn t Moves *f .. *+•* 1ff* Green Time 13 0 31 4 31 9 21 B 90 3 40 3 11 0 23 7 23 7 15 0 27 7 27 7 Volume/Cap 0 70 0 39 0 39 0 39 0 70 0 24 0 65 0 70 0 61 0 70 0 65 0 24 Delay/Veh 96 5 26 9 26 9 33 7 25 8 19 9 46 6 37 3 36 6 44 6 32 8 28 3 User DelAd] 1 00-1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 46 5 26 9 26 9 33 7 25 8 19 9 46 6 37 3 36 6 99 6 32 8 28 3 HCM2kAVg 6 6 6 9 19 4 5 10 8 7 10 3 IR##4#ifT#f1*I#a1*#1f**#*11## +##11#f1w#f##f 11R* 1#f**4##f**#*111T *11f ff#1f 111 11** Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~U ~ y° Year 2025 - with pro? ect- ATUe Aug 24, 2004 17 29 50 Page 9-1 Haven/Arrow C ity of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Pro? ect Conditions - AM ____________________________ ___ ____________ _____ ___________________ Level Of Service Computau on Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) fffff+f+ffffffffl lffffffllfTf +ffflffffffTffflTf1f11f111f 1111 1111 1ff1f 11ffff 11!11 Intersection #11 Haven Avenue/9th Street if 1f 11l11!l1f1t1T1 11f if fff 111 11 fff flfflffTffif1f 111 11#ftTiffiff lifffflff1f 1R 1f 1f cle (sec) C 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 927 " y Isec) T 8 (Y+R 4 se C) Average Delay (sec/veh) 40 7 ime Loss Optimal Cycle 117 Level Of Service f if 1 D 1111 11 11111 111 11f111f.T1f+11 111+fTTfaTf 1 1111 1f 1f1T1f11f 1!111!! lffff1111ftrf f Approach No rth Bound South Bound East Bound west Bou nd R Movement L - R - T - T - R L __________ L - T - R __ ~~_____________ L - _____ T - ______ ____I ____________ I____ P __ _________ rotected I_____ Protected Protected Protecte d Control Include Include Include Includ e Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min Green 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lanes __ 2 ____ 0 3 1 0 ___________I _______________ _______________ _____ ______ ____I __________ Volume Module 238 1932 283 118 1362 152 117 398 106 192 1306 252 Base Vol 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 Growth Adj 1 238 1932 283 118 1362 152 117 398 106 192 1306 252 Initial Bse 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 Oo 1 00 1 00 1 00 User Adz 1 00 95 1 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Adz 0 251 2039 298 124 1434 160 123 419 112 202 1375 265 pHF Volume Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 419 112 0 202 0 1375 0 265 Reduced Vol 251 2034 298 124 1439 160 1 PCE Ad 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 z 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF AdJ Final Vol 291 ____ 2039 298 ___________I 124 1434 160 _______________~ 123 419 112 ~_______________I 202 ____ 1375 _______ 265 ____ ____________ Saturation Flow Module 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane 0 B9 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Adjustment 00 3 49 0 51 2 00 2 70 0 30 1 00 2 37 0 63 1 00 1 68 0 32 Lanes 2 3400 6629 971 3400 5128 572 1800 4501 1199 1800 3185 615 Final Sat ___ ___________ _______________ I_______________ ~____ _______ ____ ____________ Capacity Anal _ ysis Module 0 09 0 li O 0 43 Vol/Sat 0 07 0 31 0 31 0 04 0 28 0 28 . Of 07 0 09 f** Cnt Moves '{1' 0 1f 4 1 30 1 30 1 7 4 24 9 29 9 29 5 46 5 46 5 Green Time 7 9 39 0 34 0 0 90 0 90 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 3B 0 38 0 38 0 93 0 93 Volume/Cap 0 93 0 9 3 1 43 1 102 3 31 7 31 7 28 5 39 2 39 2 Delay/Veh 81 6 36 2 36 2 96 0 9 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 User DelAdj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 7 28 5 34 2 39 2 Adj Del/Veh el 6 36 2 36 2 96 0 43 1 43 1 102 3 31 7 31 29 7 21 21 4 20 20 7 5 5 5 28 HCM2kAVg Tf'kf4ff1T:t 11T iTf}1fTi1*Tff4Yfl T41kT#11111+1141#fffTflRlfffllT'F TTlffff#Yfff l Rlfff Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~~~ /~~ Year 2025 - with project- PTUe Aug 24, 2009 17 29 98 Page 2-1 ________________________________________________________________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - PM ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Center Avenue/Arrow Route Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 586 Loss Time (sec) 6 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 8~9 Optimal Cycle 32 Level Of Service A Approach North Hound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____ ______________II_______________I_______________I_______________ Control I Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Mtn Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 1' 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 __________________________________________I______________________________ Volume Module Base Vol 66 0 36 33 0 18 90 1500 53 109 1513 41 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Hse 66 0 36 33 0 18 40 1500 53 109 1513 41 User Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ada 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 69 0 38 35 0 19 42 1579 56 115 1593 43 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 69 0 3B 35 0 19 92 1579 56 115 1593 43 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Ad) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 69 0 38 35 0 19 42 1579 56 115 1593 43 _________________________________________________________I_______________ Saturation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad)ustment 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Lanes 0 65 0 00 0 35 0 65 0 00 0 35 1 00 1 93 0 07 1 00 1 95 0 OS Final Sat 1229 0 671 1229 0 671 1800 3670 130 1800 3700 100 __________________________________________II______________________________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 06 0 00 0 06 0 03 0 00 0 03 0 02 0 43 0 43 0 06 0 43 0 43 Crit Moves """ """" """" Green Time 9 7 0 0 9 7 9 7 0 0 9 7 4 3 73 5 73 5 10 9 80 0 80 0 Volume/Cap 0 59 0 00 0 59 0 29 0 00 0 29 0 54 0 59 0 59 0 59 0 54 0 59 Delay/Veh 48 1 0 0 48 1 92 9 0 0 92 9 54 1 6 5 6 5 46 9 3 7 3 7 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Adl Del/Veh 48 1 0 0 48 1 42 9 0 0 42 9 54 1 6 5 6 5 96 9 3 7 3 7 HCM2kAVg 4 0 4 2 0 2 2 12 12 4 9 10 Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~~v eta 1I1 11I l_J Year 2025 - with pro]ect- PTUe Aug 24, 2004 17 29 48 Page 3-1 ____________________________________________________________________ Haven/Arrow City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 2025 With Project Conditions - PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Me[hod (Base Volume Alternative) flffwllRlfffflflflff k4ltllflflfaff+Iflfflxfllflfxlifl*Rflklflkltfllllfl#1t1Yf11f Intersection #6 Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Ifxlwf wl'kllfft11x11xx1fl if 1ll111lxxilf lfllafflxlx wf llflfxffllfl11f 1f 1111fIw1x if Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol /Cap (X) 0 940 41'~ 6 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) D Optimal Cycle 127 Level Of Sezvice Iflwf xf 1111 x1+1x11!!1! lw+flraf xllxwf: xlf l!!11l1111l111 x!1111 x111fII+ffIIf11w11 Approach North Hound South Hound East Bound West Sound Movement L- T- R L- T- R L T R L T R Control Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 Volume Module Base Vol 384 1898 295 271 879 95 556 1319 259 389 992 352 Growth Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 384 1848 295 271 879 95 556 1319 259 384 992 352 User Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Ad] 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 pHF Volume 904 1945 311 285 925 100 585 1388 273 904 1044 371 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 904 1945 311 285 925 100 585 1388 273 404 1049 371 PCE Ad] 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 409 1945 311 285 925 100 585 1388 273 404 1044 371 __________________________________________I_______________~~_______________ Satuzation Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ad]ustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 45 0 55 2 00 3 00 1 00 2 00 2 00 1 00 2 00 3 00 1 00 Final Sat 3400 6554 1096 3900 5700 1900 3900 3800 1900 3400 5700 1900 ____________I______________________________I______________________________ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 12 0 30 0 30 0 OB 0 16 0 OS 0 17 0 37 0 14 0 12 0 18 0 20 1x+f x11: 1114 11w1 Crit Moves Green Time 17 1 31 6 31 6 8 9 23 4 23 4 24 1 38 9 38 9 12 6 27 4 27 4 Volume/Cap 0 69 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 69 0 23 0 71 0 94 0 37 0 94 0 67 0 71 Delay/Veh 42 6 91 5 91 5 81 3 36 7 31 2 37 7 41 4 22 1 72 1 33 4 37 4 User DelAd7 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Ad]Del/Veh 42 6 91 5 41 5 81 3 36 7 31 2 37 7 41 4 22 1 72 1 33 4 37 4 HCM2kAVg 7 22 22 8 10 3 10 26 6 10 10 12 11x1111111!1+11:.111111111xfw+fxw+:1:1x1!!:+lflxl:xlf lxwf xx xf1x+11:11x111+f1xw1+ Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA ~ ~~o ~~~ • Year 2025 - with project- PT ue Aug 24, 2004 17 29 48 Page 4-1 Haven/Arrow City of Ranc ho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County Year 202 5 With Project Conditions - PM ________________________ _ _____ ____________ __________ __________________ Level ________ __ Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operat ions Me[hod (Base Volume Alternativ e) 1111! 11111 1if 1f 1f111if if 1111 1f iif111i1fifrfll} 11111!111 ifa 1f 111 11!1 1 //111111 111! Intersection #11 Haven Avenu e/4th Street tiff}}1ff} }}f }111}11f11lifiR }1!111! 11!1}!11#11 111#1111!1}111}11 11! 11 11!1}111 1f1t Cycle (sec ) 100 Critica l Vol /Cap (X) 0 968 Loss Time (sec) 8 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) 9T 2 Optimal Cycle 158 Level Of Service 1 D f1f}fIf}11 1iff1ffflf}11+11f1 1114ii1}1f 11f111fI 1t1f11 kf1+f 111!} f }}Y1 f#1111!#111! Approach North Bound South Bound east Bound w est Hound Movement L - T - R L - T - R ___________ L - T - R I_______________ L ____ - T - R ___________ __________ Control _________________ Protected ____ Protected Protected P rotected Rights Include Include Include Include Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes _ 2 0 3 1 0 _I_______________ 2 0 2 1 0 _______________I 1 0 2 1 0 _______________I 1 ____ 0 1 1 0 ___________~ __________ Volume Module Base Vol 170 2094 198 266 1753 177 313 1397 266 221 885 194 Growth Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse 170 2094 198 266 1753 177 313 1397 266 221 885 194 User Adl 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 PHF Adz 0 99 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 95 PHF Volume 179 2204 208 280 1845 186 329 1971 280 233 932 204 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol 179 2209 208 280 1845 186 329 1471 280 233 932 204 PCE Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 MLF Adz 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Final Vol 179 2204 208 ______________ 280 1895 186 I_______________ 329 1971 280 _______________ 233 _____ 932 204 __________ ___________ Saturation __ Flow Module Sat/Lane 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 89 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 Lanes 2 00 3 65 0 35 2 00 2 72 0 28 1 00 2 52 0 48 1 00 1 64 0 36 Final Sat 3400 6943 657 ______________I 3400 5177 523 I_______________II 1800 4788 912 _______________II 1800 _____ 3117 683 __________ ____________I_ Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat 0 OS 0 32 0 32 0 OB 0 36 0 36 0 18 0 31 0 31 0 13 0 30 0 30 Crit Moves {1f4 }.1f 1111 i1}1 Green Time 8 9 33 5 33 5 8 7 36 8 36 8 18 9 35 0 35 0 19 7 30 9 30 9 Volume/Cap 0 97 0 95 0 95 0 95 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 88 0 88 0 88 0 97 0 97 Delay/Veh 109 0 90 8 90 8 83 5 99 1 94 1 80 9 35 2 35 2 68 0 53 2 53 2 User DelAdj 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 AdjDel/Veh 104 0 90 8 90 8 83 5 49 1 94 1 80 5 35 2 35 2 68 0 53 2 53 2 HCM2kAvg 6 23 23 B 26 26 15 20 20 10 23 23 1k111R1fff}f111T1ffIf11f1fi111 if1fff111f 1f 4}1f1 fYf}if4f11111}111 11111 l11114fR11f Traffix 7 6 0715 (c) 2003 Dowling Assoc Licensed to LSA, RIVERSIDE, CA /^1 ~L ~~ •JRMA GrOYp GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 10851 EDISON CT , RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 909-989-1751 FAX 909-98911287 May 21, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lewis Operating Corp JUN 2 8 2004 1156 N Mountain Ave P O Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 RECEIVED -PLANNING Attention Mr. Dave Lewis subJect Surface Soil Evaluation Delhi Sand Flower-Loving Fly La Mancha Golf Course SW Haven & Arrow Rancho Cucamonga, CA Reference Unites States Department of Agnculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of . San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, CA, January 1980 Gentlemen In accordance with your request, we have performed an evaluation of the surficial soils at the subJect site with respect to their USDA Soil Conservation Service classification Based on the results of our study it is our opinion that the surficial soils at the subJect site do not meet the referenced USDA Soil Conservation Service's gadation cntena for Delhi sand Sr a fha lnvacfiga The general scope of this investigation was to evaluate the surficial soils at the site with respect to then USDA Soils Conservation Service classification of Delhi Sand Flower-Loving Fly Our investigation consisted of reviewing the referenced reports and maps, performing a visual reconnaissance of the site, obtaining samples of the neaz surface soils within the upper 18 inches from existing gades, laboratory testing to detennme the gam size distnbution of the surficial soils, and prepazaUon of this report Our investigation has been preformed m a manner consistent with generally accepted engineenng and geologic pnnciples and practices, and has incorporated codes, ordinances, regulations and laws that, m our professional opinion, are applicable. Definitions of technical tennis and symbols used m this report aze those of the Amencan Society for Testing and Matenals, the Uniform Building Code, . and standazd geologic references ~ ~U ~ ~~ ~RMA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewis Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 Samples of the surfic~al soils were obtained dunng our field reconnaissance and returned to our laboratory for testing The gram size d~stnbution of each of the samples obtained was determined m accordance with ASTM D422. The results of these tests are plotted along with the USDA Soil Conservation Service upper and lower boundanes for Della fine sand, and are presented m Appendix A The USDA upper and lower limits for Della fine sand 18" below existing grades are as follows Percentage Less Than 3 m Passing Sieve Delhi Sand No 4 Sieve No 10 Sieve No 40 Sieve No. 200 Sieve Boundanes (4 7 mml (? 0 mm) (0.42 mml (0 074 mml Upper L~m~ts 100 100 85 25 Lower Limits 100 90 60 15 These tests md~cate that the surfic~al soils at the site are classified as SM by the Unified Soils Classification System. The Delhi fine sand ~s defined as a fine sand classified as SM by the Unified Soils Classification System, however as md~cated m the results of our laboratory analysis, the soils at the subJect site contain portions of matenals that fall outside the Upper and Lower gadation hm~ts for the Delhi sand Based on the results of our field and laboratory tests ~t ~s our professional op~mon that the surfic~al soils at the subJect site do not meet the USDA Soil Conservation Service's cnteria for Delta sand Delhi sand ~s defined as loose, fine silty sand, which ~s aeohan in ongm The results of our gam size d~stnbution tests md~cate that the surfic~al soils at the site generally contain s~gmficant quantities of matenal which fall outside the upper and lower bounds established for the Delhi fine sand C~D /y4 C RMA Job N° 04-096-O1 Page 2 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewis Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 This report compnses a statement of professional opm~on That opinion is based on information and data obtained from the referenced report and a geotechmcal evaluation of the compiled data This report does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of any type and none should be inferred. Thank you for the opportunity to be of continued service to you on this protect If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Respectfully, RMA Group Isaac Chun, PE Protect Engineer RCE 59431 y~ Ed L on, PE Vice President GE 2362 ~~ B. No 59431 Exp. 12131105 c~o l~~ RMA Job N° 04-096-01 Page 3 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ~~D /U~ RMA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewis Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Protect No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-1 Fraction A Dry Net Werght (gtrs) 6417 Fiactl0^ B Dry Net Weight (gtrs) 513 6 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight (grits) Werght (guts) %Passing Ftactron A 3" 0 6417 100 I-1/2" 0 6417 ]00 3/4" 36 6381 99 3/8" 133 6284 98 #4 216 6201 97 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenSrze Werght(grrts) Werght(gtrts) %Passing Fraction B #8 5 5 508 ] 96 # 16 16 7 496 9 93 #30 45 9 467 7 88 #50 135 3 378 3 71 # 100 299 2 214 4 40 #200 432 3 81 3 15 ~~ LJ _ _ 100 so ~ ~ Delhi Sand 60 Upper Limn 70 60 ~' ~ c ~ ~ 50 Delhi Sand ~ `~ ~ 40 a Lower Lirtut ~ 30 \ 20 ~ I ~ ~ 10 0 100 10 1 01 001 Gram Srze (mm) RMA Job N° 04-096-01 ~'~ ~~q Page Al GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewes Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Pro3ect No 04-09601 Sample Id T-2 FncUOn A Dry Net Weight (gns) 6664 Fraction B Dry Net W eight (gtrs) 513 2 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenStze Wetgh[(grrs) Wetgh[(gms) %Passing Ftachon A 3" 0 6664 100 1-1/2" 0 6664 100 3/4" 0 6664 100 3/g" 59 6605 99 #4 157 6507 98 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenStze Wetght(grr~s) Wetght(gms) %Passing Fraction B #8 8 2 505 0 96 # 16 18 9 494 3 94 #30 43 3 469 9 89 #50 123 1 3901 74 # ] lXl 267 5 245 7 47 #200 4181 95 1 18 100 90 SO 70 60 ~ 50 m a 40 e 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 01 001 Grain Size (mm) ~~ Delhi Sand Upper Lunt T ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ De Lo lhi San wer Li d m t ~ RMA Job N° 04-096-01 Page A2 n l..J PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-3 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewts Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 Fraction A Dry Net Weight (grr~s) 5586 Fraction B Dry Net Weight (gtrs) 5224 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenSrze We~ght(grrs) Werght(gms) %Passing Fraction A 3" 0 5586 100 I-1/2" 0 5586 100 3/4" 42 5544 99 3/8" 102 5484 98 #4 155 5431 97 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight (grrs) Weight (grrs) %Passing Fraction B #8 6 8 515 6 96 # 16 16 0 506 4 94 #30 49 5 472 9 88 # 50 146 5 375 9 70 # 100 316 0 206 4 38 #200 443 1 79 3 15 _ _ 100 so ~~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Lunt 70 so ~ ~ 50 ~ ` a Delhi Sand ~ 40 >° Lower Lunt ~ 30 20 10 p 100 10 1 01 001 Gram Size (mm) RMA Job N° 04-096-01 G~D l5l Page A3 GEOTECfINICAL CONSULTANT'S Lewes Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Pro3ect No 04096-01 Sample Id T-4 Fracton A Dry Net Weight (grrs) 5021 Fraction B Dry Net Weight (guts) 523 Net Retained Net Passing Screen S~ Weight (gnts) Weight (guts) %Passing Fraction A 3" 0 5021 100 1-1/2" 0 5021 100 3/4" 0 5021 100 3/8" 30 4991 99 #4 68 4953 99 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenS~ze We~ght(gms) We~ght(grrs) %Passing Fraction B #8 1 5 521 5 98 #]6 59 5171 98 #30 23 9 499 1 94 #50 1105 4125 78 # 100 300 6 222 4 42 #200 440 0 83 0 16 ~' l ~ /~~ Pa e A4 RMA Job N° 04-096-O1 g GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewis Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 Sample ]d T-5 Fraction A Dry Net Weight (guts) 4458 FtacUOn B Dry Net Werght (gins) 483 2 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenS~ze We~ght(grrs) We~ght(grrts) %Passing Ftact~on A 3" 0 4458 100 1-1/2" 0 4458 ]00 3/4" 0 4458 100 3/g" 4 4454 100 #4 13 4445 100 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenS~ze Werght(gms) Werght(gms) %Passing Fractron B #8 1 8 481 4 99 #16 64 4768 98 # 30 19 7 463 5 96 # 50 78 5 404 7 84 # ] 00 221 0 262 2 54 #200 361 0 122 2 25 ioo so ~~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Limn 70 60 ~' ~ ~ ~ \ ~` 50 a Delhi Sand ~ 40 =° Lower Lunt ~ 30 \ 20 I I ~ ~ ,o 0 '100 'I O 1 0 1 0 01 Gram Size (mm) RMA Job N° 04-096-01 c~~ ~y3 Page AS RMA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewis Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-6 , Fraction A Dry Net Weight (grrs) 4054 FlaCtlOn B Dry Net Weight (gns) 503 3 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight(gtrs) Weight(grrts) %Passing FraCLOn A 3" 0 4054 100 ]-1/2" 0 4054 100 3/4" 0 4054 100 3/8" 60 3994 99 #4 100 3954 98 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Sue Weight (grt~s) Weight (grrs) %Passing Fraction B #8 3 0 500 3 97 # 16 7 6 495 7 96 #30 ]82 4851 94 # 50 80 5 422 8 82 # 100 309 9 ] 93 4 37 #200 464 3 39 0 8 ~J r~ u RMA Job N° 04-096-O1 c~a ~sy Page A6 • GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewts Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Pro3ect No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-7 Fmctron A Dry Net Werght (gins) 4333 Fraction B Dry Net W eight (gars) 523 4 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight (gins) Werght (grr5) %Passing FiaCUO^ A 3" 0 4333 100 1.1/2^ 0 4333 100 3/4" 74 4259 98 3/8" 93 4240 98 #4 IIS 42]5 97 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight (guts) Werght (gins) %Passing Fractron B #8 4 9 518 5 96 # 16 15 8 507 6 94 #30 323 4911 9] #50 99 6 423 8 79 # 100 226 7 296 7 55 #200 361 4 162 0 30 _ 100 90 ~~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Linvt 70 60 ~ ~ ~ 50 ~ ~ a Delhi Sand ~ ~ 40 =° Lower Lirrut ~ 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0 1 0 01 Gram Size (mm) RMA Job N° 04-096-O1 c~~ ass Page A7 ~RMA Grovp GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewes Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 -~ Sample Id T-8 Frncnon A Dry Net Weight (gins) 5423 Frncuon B Dry Net Werght (gns) 5096 Net Retained Net Passing ScreenSrze Werght(grrs) Werght(grrts) %Passing Fraction A 3" 0 5423 100 1-1/2" 0 5423 100 3/4" 177 5246 97 3/8" 315 5108 94 #4 423 5000 92 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Werght (grrn) Werght (gins) %Passing FmctronB #8 95 5001 90 # 16 27 4 482 2 87 # 30 68 8 440 8 80 # 50 144 0 365 6 66 # 100 299 2 210 4 38 #200 448 0 61 6 11 100 90 ~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Lunt 70 60 ~ ~ c ~ ~ 50 ~ ~` a Delhi Sand 40 ;e Lower Lunt ~ 30 10 0 100 10 1 O 1 0 01 Gram Sae (m m ) RMA Job N° 04-096-01 ~ ~!~ 151.E Page A8 • GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Lewts Operating Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-9 Fraction A Dry Net Weight (gins) 5988 Fraction B Dry Net Weight (girls) 5193 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight(gms) Weight(grrts) %Passing Fraction A 3" 0 5988 100 1-1/2" 0 5988 100 3/4" 0 5988 100 3/g" 5 5983 100 #4 7 5981 100 . Screen Size Net Retained Weight(grris) Net Passing Weigh[(gim) %Passing Fraction B #8 1.2 518 1 ]00 #16 44 5149 99 #30 191 5002 96 #50 105 9 413 4 80 # 100 307 3 212 0 41 #200 462 8 56 5 11 100 90 ~~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Lirtut 70 60 ~' ~ c ~ ~ 50 m ~ ~` a Delhi Sand 40 =° Lower Lim[ ~ 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 01 001 Gram Sae (m m ) RMA Job N° 04-096-0] ~ ~.~ ~s~ Page A9 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D422 Project No 04-096-01 Sample Id T-10 Fraction A Dry Net Weight (gins) 3897 Fraction B Dry Net Weight (gins) 502 8 Lewis Operaring Corporation La Mancha Golf Course Rancho Cucamonga, CA May 21, 2004 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight(grrn) Weigh[(gms) %Passing Fraction A 3" 0 3897 100 ]-1/2" 0 3897 100 3/4" 0 3897 100 3/8" 3 3894 100 #4 12 3885 100 Net Retained Net Passing Screen Size Weight (gins) Weight (gins) %Passing FractionB #8 07 5021 100 # 16 4 5 498 3 99 #30 30 6 472 2 94 #50 1297 3731 74 # 100 324 3 ] 78 5 35 #200 460 0 42 8 8 100 90 ~~ Delhi Sand 80 Upper Lunt 70 60 ~ ~ c ~ ~ 50 Delhi Sand ` \~ 40 a Lower Limn 30 ` 20 10 I 0 '100 7O 1 01 001 Grain Size (m m ) RMA Job N° 04-096-01 c ~D is8 Page A10 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The followrng Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 Public Review Period Closes. October 27, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Investment Company Project Location (also see attached map)• The property generally bounded by Center Avenue, Arrow Route, 26th Street, and Haven Avenue - APN 029-092-04 Project Description: A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park and the zoning from Industrial Park (Subarea 6) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on the westerly 20 55 acres of a total 37 78 acre site, establish a Master Plan Designation for the entire site, and adjust the Haven Overlay District Boundary approximately 60 feet easterly, consistent with the land use designation change FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the followrng finding. ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study The project fde and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477.2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period Date of Determination ^ Adopted By ~~ Resolution Recommending Approval RESOLUTION NO 04-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00272 FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON THE WESTERLY 20 55 ACRES OF THE TOTAL 37 78 ACRES, AND WITH A MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CENTER AVENUE, ARROW ROUTE, 26TH STREET, AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0209-092-04 A Recitals 1 Lewis Investment Company has filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On October 27, 2004, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on October 27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the westerly 20 55 acres of the total 37 78 acres, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the east side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Route and 26th Street, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as industnal Park, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medwm-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with apartments The property to the west is designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single-family detached units The property to the east is designated Industnal Park and is vacant The property to the south is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single- famdy detached units c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distnct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and oblectrves of the Land Use Element, and ~~~ ~ ~Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-114 DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 2 e This amendment would not be matenally in~unous or detnmental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substaniial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distnct m terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and c That the proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togethervwth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration vnth regard to the application b That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed protect, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 and directs the Land Use Map be amended as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto for reference 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~1J / (ol PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-114 DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-~nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ ~....J L' ~D l!0 2 C~ GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT LAND USE AMENDMENT BOUNDARY GENERAL PLAN ® LOW ® LOW MEDIUM ® MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGH GENERAL COMMERCIAL ® INDUSTRALL PARK ® GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ~.. HEAW INDUSTRIAL ~ FLOOD CONTROL /UTILITY CORRIDOR Exhibit A DRC2004-00272 (GPA) CIE INDICATES MASTERPLAN REQUIREMENT FOR ENTIRE 37.78 ACRE AREA PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT OF ANY PORTION. 300 0 300 600 Fe ~~p 1~3 ~///%% Reso/ubon Recommending Denial RESOLUTION NO 04-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF TO LOW-MEDIUM RES DENT ALR4-8 DOWELLING UONITS PER ACRE) ON THE WESTERLY 20 55 ACRES OF THE TOTAL 37.78 ACRES, AND WITH A MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CENTER AVENUE, ARROW ROUTE, 26TH STREET, AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0209-092-04 A ReGtals 1 Lewis Investment Company has filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On October 27, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date • 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on October 27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the westerly 20 55 acres of the total 37 78 acres, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the east side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Route and 26th Street, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as mdustnal Park, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with apartments The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and isdeveloped wdhsingle-family detached urnts The property to the east is designated Industnal Park and is vacant The property to the south is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) and is developed wrath smgle- familydetached units c This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and . will not provide for development within the distract in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and ~~~,^ ~~ i / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-114 DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 2 e This amendment would not be materially inlunous or detrimental to the adjacent properties and will not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibilitywith existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and c That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together Huth all wnrien and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project wall have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Dedarat~on and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed protect, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur c Pursuant to the provisions of Sed~on 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed probed wall have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends denial of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ iio~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-114 DRC2004-00272 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 3 BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST' Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS CJ coo ins Resolution Recommending Approval RESOLUTION NO 04-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00273 REQUESTING POARK DESIGNATION OF SUBAREA 6, TO LOW-MEDIUM RES DENTIAL (4 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON THE WESTERLY 20 55 ACRES OF THE TOTAL 37 78 ACRE SITE, ESTABLISHING A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT PURSUANT TO RCMC 17 20 030 FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, AND ADJUSTING THE HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT BOUNDARY APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET EASTERLY, CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CENTER AVENUE, ARROW ROUTE, 26TH STREET, AND HAVEN AVENUE. APN.0209-092-04 A Rentals 1 Lewis Investment Company filed an application for Development Distnct Amendment DRC2004-00273, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Distncl Amendment is referred to as "the application " CJ 2 On October 27, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga • conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application DRC2004-00273 and issued Resolution No 04-114 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 be approved 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred g Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on October 27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togethervnth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 20 55 acres of land of the total 37 78 acres, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the east side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Route and 26th Street, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Industnal Park, and b nhtsprePacreoandnsrtde~elopedbwith a'partmentsnaThe property tohtheswest'sl (14-24 dwelling P ) . designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed vwth single-family the south s des gnated Low Res dental (2-4 dwelling unt ssper acne) and is developed ~nnth s ngle~ family detached urots ~~ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-115 DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 . Page 2 c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the distnct, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and This amendment does promote the goals and oblectrves of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be matenally in~unous or detnmental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subtect property is suitable for the uses permdted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and c That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as . amended 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the pro~ectwhich are listed in the Initial Study and will be imposed on any future development c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1n-d) of Title 14 ofnthe Califomia Code of Regulations C~ ~~ ~ ~o r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-115 DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 . Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Distnct Amendment DRC2004-00273 and directs the Development Distncts Map be amended m conformance with the attached Exhibit "A" Map 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-~nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ct~p ~~8 r1 ~J DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT • HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE DEV DISTRICT AMENDMENT BOUNDARY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS ® L ® ~ ® M ® ~ MU ® IP ® GI MIHI ® FC Exhibit A DRC2004-00273 (DDA) 300 0 300 600 Feet c~a «~ Reso/uGon Recommending Denral RESOLUTION NO 04-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2004-00273 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK DESIGNATION OF SUBAREA 6, TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON THE WESTERLY 20 55 ACRES OF THE TOTAL 37 78 ACRE SITE, ESTABLISHING A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT PURSUANT TO RCMC 17.20 030 FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, AND ADJUSTING THE HAVEN OVERLAY DISTRICT BOUNDARY APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET EASTERLY, CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CENTER AVENUE, ARROW ROUTE, 26TH STREET, AND HAVEN AVENUE. APN 0209-092-04 A Recitals 1 Lev~ns Investment Company filed an application for Development Distnct Amendment DRC2004-00273, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Development Distnct Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On October 27, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application DRC2004-00273 and issued Resolution No 04-114 recommending to the City Council that the assoaated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00272 be denied All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred g Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, rt is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on October27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, togethervnth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 20 55 acres of land of the total 37 78 acres, basically a rectangle configuration, located on the east side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Route and 26th Street, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Industnal Park, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with apartments The property to the west is designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed v~nth single-family detached units The property to the east is designated Industnal Park and is vacant The property to the south is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed wrath single- famdy detached units C~jU I~1o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-115 DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 2 c This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e This amendment would not be materially m~unous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the, environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speufic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subtect property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distnd m terms of access, size, and compatibility with ewstmg land use m the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and c That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Plan as amended 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wall have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Decaration month regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, alt significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are shown m the Initial Study and will be imposed on any future development c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~~~ i~o~+ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-115 DRC2004-00273 - LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY October 27, 2004 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends denial of Development Distnct Amendment DRC2004-00273 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall cerliry to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-wnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS c Ao i~,r To Planning Commissioners and City Council Members From: Richard Fletcher, Planning Commission Re• General Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-(?0272 Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment DRC2004-00273 LewZS Investment Company I would like to start by saying that I have the greatest adrmration and respect for the Lewis Family and the Lewis Group of Companies, both for what they have done for the community of Rancho Cucamonga and for Southern California. They have been instrumental for a large part in the development and cultural enhancements for our community and I'm am thankfiil for that. I do, however, respectfully disagree in this instance about the need for a General Plan Amendment for the "La Mancha Golf Course" propertv The "new information' provided to justify the amendment, the "Fiscal Impact Analysis", is based on current mazket data and the demand for housing We all know that the demand for housing currently exceeds the supply and that the migration to the Inland Empire is dnven in large part by the low cost of land and houses We have taken the housing element into account when the Master Plan was first developed and again vv hen a ~: as last reviewed There is plenty of land left available within the City as designated in the General Plan for residential development. In fact, as the staff report suggests. we have ahead} convened a good deal of acreage from Industnal/Commercial to residential and I have no doubt that in the future we wil] convert other properties to residential as we look at infills and redevelopments, especially in regazds to affordable and senior housins The La Mancha property is significant to our'~ision' for the Haven Avenue Overlay Dtstnct. That'tiision" is for `upscale sophisticated" office buildings or office parks, something suitable to attract regional or national headquarters to the city. Why is this important' Because it provides places for our residents to work without having to commute on consested freeways This property was specifically designated within the General Plan to fulfill a balance of places to work per residents Irving here. It was part of the Economic Development considerations and quality of Life considerations that went into the General Plan. This type of land is severely limited within our city and once you take rt avvav you have forever eliminated thepossibility for office development of the scale vv e envision This is the last parcel of this size. The importance of the size is that rt allows more flexibiliq~ in dev eloping a high rise office building or office park. If in ten years or menty years the vision is not fulfilled we can always build the houses. But it doesn't vv ork the other wav azound The Applicanu ~ushfication for a Plan and Zone change are based on "current market" conditions and demands. That's good if you want to develop and sell something fast, but it is not best for good planning. Shortly after becoming a Planning Commissioner I was informed and Teamed that our decisions should not be made based on "immediate mazket pressures" but on what we feel is best for the community, balanced against the rights of propem owners. Often this takes a lot of time to get it right Even the courts have • = .- .~ -;; ~.r .. ._ _ .r`h.< recognized that `good plarirttng" takes tune to fulfill. It doesn't happen overnight and sometimes it doesn't happen for years. The applicant makes the argument that there isn't the demand for the type of office development that we desire. They state that the office mazket is overbtnlt and corporate office users will choose available sites other than the La Mancha property This may very well be true for the present time, but we aze planning for what can be in the future, not necessarily what can be built and sold today. Besides, much of what I've been reading lately indicateslust the opposite, That the Inland Empire is both economically and demographically pursed to support office development. In a recent supplement to the Business Press there was an article titled "The Neat Wave is Office Development" It indicated that office space typically follows commercial and residential growth. To quote, "The Inland Empire is seeing the kind of office development that is going to set records for the area", said Tom Pietik, senior vice president for Lee & Assoctates '`Real estate and public officials are keeping a watchful eve on how office space develops in their regions, but absorption doesn't seem to be a problem. even with more than one million square feet of office space under construction and another rno million planned " Mazk Piscitelli. executive vice president and managing director for the Ontano office of Grubb and Ellis made a reference to Ontano, San Betriazdino. and Riverside statins "These cities have seen heavy residential. commercial and industnal developments that have already attracted residents and businesses to the region. It only makes sense for office developments to follow.'' Real estate officials predict high office space growth in those markets, at least until the land runs out or the puce goes up Next tier cities like Rancho Cucamonga ,Fontana, and Corona expect to get the heavy growth Headquarters are Needed While local officials respect the need for small businesses, they know that it's the presence of mayor corporations that realh• grow a community. The Inland Empire is home to only 20 publicly traded companies, and only a handful are nationally recognized names Several mayor national companies hav e branches or divisions in the region that help attract other businesses "That's what we need to focus on now"' said John Htuing, rice president of Redlands-based Econonucs and Politics Inc °The area is now used for backend offices or smaller divisions The azea needs to show corporate America that it is poised and ready to take on businesses that want to put their national headquarters here. We need to shove them that we have the white and blue collaz work force, the office space and the community that will support theta. And that happens through marketing:' The Inland Empire Economic Paztneislup has started a new three year marketing campaign pointing out the strengths of the Inland Empire. Iu new- President and CEO. Mazk Hiller, states, "W"e're going to be aggressn e in our public relations campazgn. There is no question in my mind that the Inland Empire is ready to take this major step. R'e have seen gmvvth in all areas. including office space It's an exciting time'. This is vv hat the business community envisions and what wE envisioned in our General Plan It can be a realm In resazds to our General Plan, I believe we have a very good one. It doesn't mean we can't or won't review it as changes occur, but we have to give it time to work. My opinion of our General Plan was reinforced recently at the CCAPA convention in Palm Springs this month. I had an opportunity to meet some employees of the consulting firm that helped with the last revision to our plan. They had some _ _ _ _, ~. ~ _~._ brochures from BuilderlArehitect titled "Rancho Cucamonga: Where Quality is the Rule". I helped myself to a handful and they are enclosed for review. I understand many of you may have already seen this, but it makes for a good reminder of the process the city went through vnth the last plan review . It is an awazd winning plan and it's review started with the question'`How do you get better if you are already doine well". The answer was to insist on nothine but the best in a contemporary, finely tuned General Plan and that is what the cite got. One of the objectives of the update to the plan was to reposition the city to achieve the right amount, type, and location of commercial, recreation, and office development. The time frame for this was 20 years, to 2020. The article ended with the comment that the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga can look forward to an even greater focus on the excellence that has made this one of the most desirable communities in the region. I happen to strongly agree with that but if we are to get there we have to maintain our vzsrlance m good planning To consider a Plan Amendment and zone chance without a development apphcanon or master plan of the azea would not be good planning procedure I think it would be wTOng to constder a plan amendment at this nine It is stmpl} the wTOng tune and the wTOng property to change~tts_ptece of land is extremely ,mnnnam to the City as it is planned and zoned, but it will take riine'to ful t p -""iI tzroperties It satd "We must make some disciplined decisions about where to build, and where not to build, and not let the pressures of the moment overwhelm us". I feel any chance at this time would be a mistake and I feel it would be detrunental to Rancho's business community and it s restdeats I would not be supporti~ e of this requested plan amendment. r Y Q 6 W m x ti 0 i W f W J a r V z_ N W 'e a ~ex~ wave is ot°fice development Offtce space typtcally follotivs commercial and restdenttal growth, experts say z BY JIN NARTYRA yl SPEQ1L iD T}{F 0L51\E551'RF55 The Inland Emptre hu gamed a rc umUOn u a hot spot (or rcs~denaal commercial and mdusmal growth Th growth can be seen from highly popular markets tike On[ano and Rnernde t more aolated spots tike the Htgh DL~scrt and Coachella Vauey malang the Inland Empuc [he new sliming star m the Galdcn State Office development has been the slow est to catch on m [he Inland Cmptrc follownng the pattern found m vmdar markets where office span [tads other types of deselopment and growth Thc Inland Empire lacks the abundance o office space found m Orange and San Diego counties and no major bwldmg projects planned tt s Line for office space OfLce deselopment is about to explodL m [hL Inland Empire and lust as employ ees mine [o the area and small and IargL businesses took to open dinvons bmnchLS and headquarters m [he area Thc Inland Emptre fices the challenges of catching up with the rest of Southern California an its office space deselopmen[ and using tt to a[vact business to an area [hat has been long oserlooked 'ate Inland Emptre is sccmgthL land of office space developmentthat rthas once seen hfore the land of drselopmen[that rs going [o set records Cor the area' Bard Tom Acnk semontce prestdem (or IAL & Associates 9t sernang but them ~s alsoa tittle apprchenvon [hu we might bL desclapmg a tittle more than wr can absorb We ma} time to watt and see I[ wouldn the out of the ordmarv Ithmk this is an ceanng Ume but the Inland Emp~rc probably sell expenence SomL growing pmns nmv that u s m thL office duelopntcnt market' Rrat L~stare and public afiiaals arc kcepmG a wa[chml ere on how o(Lce>pacc desrlops m flier ng~ons but absarpttan down r seem [o be a problun nen w~[h nmre than l mtlhon square feet of office space under cons[rumon and another 2 million planned Major crLes gow first 'nterc are some markets that am smply rtadv for [tits land of growth " said Vark Ptsntelh e\ecvme wtce pressden[ and managing dtrLttor for the Ontano office ofOmbbR Ellis 'Omm~o is ofceursc the biggest San &mardmo and Rncrnde arc tight them as well These ones halt Bern henry restdrwal commernal and mdus- [nal dmelopments that hate already attmtted residents and businesses [o [he region II only makes sense for office deselopments to follow' Real estate otfinals predttt hrgh office space growth m [hose markets at Ieu[ until the land runs out or the pncc gas up P (current m[rs of about 525 a square foot for Class A Spam are stgntficantly Iowcr e than other Sou[hem Galrfomta ngtans ed but mtteumg steaddyl Next uer ones o Irks Rancho Cuomonga Fontana and Corona expett to get the henry growth and so on and so on 'I[ s amazrng how gmckly flits growth happens bu[ludaly we were ready font' said Rueben Estrada chairman of [he On[ano Chamber of Commerce 'The Inland Emptre in general has embraced [tits kind ofgrowth espenally now when ( ¢ is the goal of many tnmmunrtres to a[tratt more business to the area' The arcs must a[tratt businesses to fill nesv office space There arc plenty of smaller firms that Benue [he area espy wally m the finannal scones and medal sectors Thev are taking up gwte a brt aC the new office space wNch typ¢ally ~s done as a threestary or less bwldmg Headquarters needed Whde local ofTinals respect the nttd for small buvnesses they know chat it 5 [tic presence ofmalor corpomnons that really growacommumry The Inland Emptre is home to only 20 pubady traded mmpames and only a handful arc nanonatly recognized names Several major nanonal mmpanigs hale branches or dmsions m the rcg~on that help a[matt other businesses 'That s what we need to focus on now' said John Hustng nee pms~dcn[ o(Red- lands based Economms R Potion Inc 'Rte area is now used for backend offices or smalhr dmsons The area needs to show corporate Amenca [hat rt s poised and rradv [o take on businesses that wan[ [o pm therz nanonal headquarters here \1e toed to show them that we hose the whnr and blurcollarswrk force the office space and thL commumry that wolf support them .Ind [hat happens through market ing " ilru is one of [hL mom aasons [hL Inland Emptre Economic Pattnershtp brought m new Prestdc tit and CEO Paul Hdlcr Ind so brans what he calls a thrmycar marketing campaign po~nttng out the strengths of the Inland Emptre "Nanv pLVplelust don [ realize how the area has changed and n s our lob to let them know' he Bard "\Ve m going to be aggressne m our public relations cam paign There a no question m my mind that the Inland Emptre a ready to rake thu molar step We hale seen growth m all areas mdudmg office Spam I[ s an exnnngnme'^ Inland Empire In Square Feet 1,200,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 Office Space Construction Source Grubb & EIIis Research Inland Empire Office Vacancy Rates asses of space 1% ._._. 137°5 8°5 6'S ,'. 24r02 34'02 4402 1(1/03 24/03 30/03 ~Cr03 10-Oa 20.01 Source Grubo & EIIis Research Inland Empire Net Office Absorption In Square Feet 600 000 350 000 300 000 150 000 ae .x. - w-• ~-r - ~ a+ +.r.w.n vn. t. - v ~! b~ert ~ ~ -.w ~+,~+u ~'~m~< r m ~. '~ c - ae wl E ReilEstateJournal ~ Office Office October 1. Market Shows More Improvement Guide 1o Property The Wall Street Journal Careerlournal College)ournal OpinionJOUrnal StartupJOUrnal WSJbooks CareerJournalASla Career]ournalEurope By RYAN CHITTUM Staff ReDOrter of The Wall Street Journal From The Wa/I Street Journal OnOne The U.S. office market showed further signs of Improvement In the third quarter as companies took up more space than In any quarter in nearly four years, according to a new survey The increase pushed the vacancy rate down to 16 6% in the quarter from 16 8% In the second quarter Asking rents were unchanged in the third quarter at $24.09 per square foot per year, ending more than three years of quarterly declines, according to the survey of the top 64 U.S. office markets by Reis Inc., a New York-based coin inertial-rea I-estate research firm Actual rents fell lust two cents, or 0 1%, to $20 11 Page 1 of 3 -- - - , advanced sears IN THIS STORY So-called absorption -- the net amount of occupied real estate -- lumped to 11 2 million square feet in the third quarter, up from 7 6 million square feet in the second quarter and the most since the fourth quarter of 2000 http.//www.realestate~ovlnal.com/propertyreport/office/20041012-chtttum html 10/27/2004 RehlEstateJournal ~ Office That is a good sign for the U S economy as a whole, because employers lease more space when they are adding workers and dump space when they are laying them off The numbers are also good news for landlords, who have been battered by the economy's downturn -- which caused vacancies to more than double from a low of 7.7% four years ago and rents to plummet by more than 20% from a high of $25.34 per square foot in the first quarter of 2001 Page 2 of 3 OFFICE DACE Vas~rtoy rate and average rent per square foot per year ~ the tap 84 U S. markets VaoanoNs Sian scale) - Ratt y^ (rghi scale) 7pW 2004 Sounr Rota Mc Landlords have come through what has been one of the worst periods ever in the office market, and did so without the rash of bankruptcies and foreclosures that plagued the market in the late 1980s and early 1990s, helping to send the U S economy into recession. This time, despite a record stretch where 10 of 11 quarters saw negative absorption, landlords have gotten by because of low interest rates and more discipline by developers. Commercial Real Estate Loans Black's Guide: National And Featured Companies Innovative Investing Tools Int'I Council of shopping Centers "We're looking forward to a brighter picture in 2005 and a very bright picture in 2006," said Michael Silver, president of Equis Corp ,commercial-real-estate services firm based in Chicago Mr Silver, whose company represents tenants in lease deals, said he is advising his clients to lock in rents now before they start rising Washington continued to be the tightest market in the country in the third quarter, with a vacancy rate of 7.7%. The nation's capital and San Bernardino, Calif., are the only two markets in the U S with single-digit vacancies Dallas's vacancy rate went down to 26 1% in the third quarter from 26.5% in the second, but it was still the highest in the country. But in a sign that the recovery is taking hold nationwide, 46 of the 64 markets Reis surveyed saw more space occupied "The evidence of stabilization is becoming more apparent, but that doesn't mean that happy days are here again," said Lloyd Lynford, chief executive of Reis Investors' appetite for top-notch, well-leased buildings and their willingness to take a lower return after the stock-market bust has driven investment sales to record prices Despite that, developers so far have remained disciplined About eight million square feet of new construction became available in the third quarter, the most in five quarters, but the pace is still well below historical averages The http://www.realestate~ournal com/propertyreport/office/20041012-cluttum.html 10/27/2004 ReatlEstateJottrnal ~ Office Page 3 of 3 amount of new office space built this year, protected to be about 29 mlillon square feet, will be the lowest in eight years. Reis protects 2005 will see about 34 mlillon square feet of new space become available Reis protects that the vacancy rate will fall to 15.7% by the end of next year, with rents rising 1 1% Home E-mall to a Friend Print-Friendly Format Write to the Editor Too of Paae Subscribe to The Wall Street Journal Online or take a tour Easy Home Financing Hfgh-Tech Degrees Fast Auto Financing . Bad credit? Bankruptcy? Interested in earning your Pre-quality for a bad credA Homeowners high-tech degree9 auto financing www e,lend9 cpm www awonline=degree www_fundmgway_Gpm Copyright p 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc All Rights Reserved By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy R55 ~ http.//www realestate~otunal.com/propertyreport/office/20041012-cluttiJm html 10/27/2004 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: October 27, 2004 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW- DRC2004-00122 - ORTIZ - A request to develop one single-family hillside residence totaling 6,006 square feet on 47 acre in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) in the Haven View Estates, located at 10973 Stallion Way - APN 1074-551-15 • ANALYSIS A General The property is a single-family lot located in the Haven View Estates gated community north of Hillside Avenue, west of Haven Avenue Because of its location in the hillside area, the design is subject to the City Hillside Development Regulations The lot slopes to the south at a relatively uniform 13 percent The house is located within the 30- foot building envelope as required by the City's Hillside Development Standards and within the maximum lot coverage regwrements for of the Very Low Residential Distnct The applicant has proposed afour-car, tuck-under garage This garage will provide a cut of 7 feet into the natural terrain, and, hence, regwres Planning Commission approval The entry of the garage faces towards the west, away from the streeUpublic view The applicant has met with staff regarding the placement of the garage and ways to reduce the cut of the natural terrain Hypothetically, if the garage was raised to be less than 5 feet, this would raise the slope of the driveway above the 20 percent maximum and would regwre additional retaining walls B Grading Committee On July 20, 2004, the Committee originally reviewed the protect The Committee recommended several revisions and the applicant addressed all issues The revised plans were brought back for approval by the Grading Committee The applicant has met numerous times with staff to incorporate special hillside design features into the design of the home such as stepped planter areas on the east and south . elevations, terraced walls, and stepped floor systems ITEM "E" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00122 - ORTIZ Single Family Hillside Home Page 2 C Desion Review Committee On September 14, 2004, the Committee reviewed the site, grading, and architecture of the protect The Committee (McPhail, Fletcher, Fong) recommended approval subtect to staff and Grading Committee recommendations D Environmental Assessment This protect is environmentally exempt from CEQA review. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Hillside Design Revew DRC2004-00122 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectt submitted Brad Buller City Planner BB EW\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan and Elevations Draft Resolution of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2004-00122 • • i ~-~ s ~a~~ a YLANXINO WE• ~ ~MI~ b .n °'eaw ~ :' ~91 o sm~•v•m° `w Y • C-1 SM1e Plan, Sheel Index Propct InformaLOn OROf004SOdII _ , w u m .m irk ~4-n.l ~y ~ a.n. ~ ~rrw"_= x A-1 Fimt Floa Plan --a-: te -- -- - -__ y r O { STALLION WAY A-2 Second Floor Plan ~, y Y ~ ,.~,~,,, A-3 Rool Plan ~~ .~e. ~~ A-4 Extenor EI<wtrong ..~ ~ "'°°°"""e m°,„S A-5 Exterior Elewliong ~~ / { g ~ w•w _ ( ~ I Preliminary Grading k Drainage Plan ~ W.. " .rte .m° ~ ~ ^ ~+w 2 ulsc Secbong k Prolile / ` ~ 4 r N I \ V °e Sheet InAex xm E ) Mme J a..e +x. t X rmrwcw ° Pro act Deecr et en Proposed 6006 gq ^ (Habdable space) _ A Two-stay Single-lamly Reaidence ~'- I ~ ~ ;~~ l P p 9 d _ '~ ~ roiJes _Adereas Lot 9i, Slollion Way Roncbo Cucamonga Co 91]3] g -- „,n,,,,~,~ San Bernardino Counly ~ ~ d el naoncsto ®~ ,,,,, L4L_SIiL 20 45] sq It (0 4] acres) _ i r 6 ]-STORI SINGLE mlbl own4wc ^ r.,~'~".°°~^,,,,,e~I P.eoased Frst Rce r }61] sq It (excluding e garage+pach m oared to outsde wall) t w~ Provo=ed Garaae 1102 sq Il 1 I "` 4 ~ xk~ • B • •A :i e°.: =___i/` ___= _ ~~~ -- /" ~ ~ N m ~ a Pro Dosed Covered Porctl }55 9q ll Prooosed Second Floor 2489 s Il q (Wxcludmg deckg/bolconys memuretl fa outaitle oIQ n~io~iio rw. arna w ~y1n 1~1 o e nn a~ w_ eau ~w ~ /a ~ _° J Ai ~w+~ ~~ Z v 5ecend Floa Balcanw 550 sq ^ pJ1 10]4-551-15 im 11iw%MS w wo~~~ 1ii i. . r _ ~ a , 1 e-e ez ru ; ___ _ ' F l D rl T L l 12332 2 t 92 Q . caa escr o on rac - Lo ~. s m. sham s Gulde Pa 5]3-C1 = ~eM am~yv ..e, +~S "` °'^' F ~` I ~ 2 .,,. ~ .~ ~. s Proleet nformqilon ~ ~ r..~d.__ _ _ _ -_ - _ x ; ti d'~ 1 F _ ~ _ •' ` ~ *, ~ \ ~ \ a~.n.n ~: ate. ~t E i y( „ '$ ,i .d ^ ~ ~i~ \ ~ I I r !/ r . ILJLOr~g1 .neermu , ti I +oy y ~ ' !~ I J JI 1# ~I a 1...• `_~If _ _ `1,L t I mIn ~ . e.w.ae..r.uem ~e ..,i. IAN r e k R eme" _ jl rugoE ao,~ .~.~ ~ ~il ~ ~ - ' II _ __L-_.-JI_. • j P.weeee sn. nen gneel Ineex eYr A `, I) r ~ i '{+` ~ ig t ~r ~. e NdnpY Mop Y e4. __ _ne rw ~ .il ~r ... +~, x ' '"' "" r /J~ rV'I w ZtD j.- w eI- - 1~ ruvr~uwn(O /I~ ~~/ _ ° C-~ Sde Plon sme uI -0 4 Y<mlly Map xrs ~~ 3 J GARAGE PLAN DELOw HOUSE -_-5TH9Y-_-_ rr yum ~--~ II--- sacx GUEST ROOM MED~Ao, ri.x:im Rm EAMILY p00M G.iam` LMNG ROOM rr_v. m~ DINING WWE ii BUYERS GWiRV N I KI`C=HE~ of r 9REY KF AST PLMINIMO fAIF / ONC/O/{OOtII .~„tip e n.~a~vom e®esese~wmiuml a N. ' Wti nroeNe ran Rea Nan clay. Hm ~Mp ~,., q-1 J &L4CONV PALCCNT I -a_1_a O Cw~ ~I~FEO - BEDROOM b3 9xgONV MASTER to i> s N _ 9A„B . m I - ___ i O --- _ - -~ - utt..w i ~ is ~.os _-bP~N-TO i ' ~ ~. w BELbw ''_--------- cLO ; I ___ CLOSET O 'v^i --- CLO ~ ~ I ' ' ' ' 1 1 ' ___ I _______ ___I___ _______ EDROOM ~4 I I I 02EI~,~0, ASTER BEDRM tT ? i~ FAMIyYtR00M 8 9 rr. v 9EI~OW. I 1 1 ; s Po - . - BALCONY I I BALCONY .: ne.m 1 ~J amo.m soma nod nm - .uNmxa eAeE. ,~ um®m,®_v+m ~Ine...-.. ~ o.n v,wm.u smma nod nm mw °r A-2 q R E6 g-6.~ @ Ey ~ a ~E {p{E ~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 E° ~r%E - p ~ T° 9 ~c6 EK YFA bP b 4 ~ ~ ~5 € • ;A t : f¢ S ' o nnnnn ~ooo ooooo [ iiiiii g a i~I d I 6 yy I If c Fqq_ttt ~ ~ ~ ~ i S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IIII~I~ ~ sE~/ i 2 t 6 ~k ~~ _ - - - I L ~ _ i' ~I I P , 8 ~ 11 ~B ~~ 0p ! II ,~~ ~ ' n I - I ' - --- 1 - - _ _ t _ - - ~. _ °L~ i 1 I I ~ 1' ~ I i1 II II II I r JI I i, I 1 d I I ~I I F I 1 ~1 ~ I pp~p[ ~ I I P{ € ~ I e I' ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~eg~ ~1 p @~ ia~ se ~ ~ s- ~ ~p:~ ~ 33 I ~ ~C E'g p 5 r ~ e~ &?E i~ 5? ~ Q ~~£N ?".~ e3 S~ ~ ^c i3cA a ~ r& ~ooooo ooo o®oooa oo iiiiii A ~~i ~~~~~~ .-tllu~ sail ~ ~ ~` ~ - - - E ~ Fg a~ 1 i9~ ~~ .. >. P ~~ ~g i i i i l 5 E-~ ~; RESOLUTION NO 04-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00122, A REQUESTTO CONSTRUCTA6,006 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON 47 ACRE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) IN THE HAVEN VIEW ESTATES, LOCATED AT 10973 STALLION WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 1074-551-15 A Recitals 1 Tito and Alicia Ortiz filed an application on behalf of Gregory and Donelle Bentleyforthe approval of Development Review DRC2004-00122 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of October 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Parl A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on October 27, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 10973 Stallion Way, with a street frontage of 100 34 feet and lot depth of 203 07 feet, and b The properties to the east and west have been developed wrath single-family homes The property to the north is vacant, to the south is Stallion Way, and c The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs, and d The proposed development is consistent with single-faintly development in the area (Tract 11626), and e The applicant is proposing to cut 1,006 cubic yards (up to 7 feet deep) and fill 180 cubic yards cubic yards of soil from the site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-116 DRC2004-00122 - ORTIZ October 27, 2004 Page 2 b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the wGnity 4 The Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAcl of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division • 1) Approval is fora 6,006 square foot home located at 10973 Stallion Way 2) In addition to the landscaping required by the Hillside Ordinance, extensive ground cover plantings wdl be regwred to provide erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3) Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a natural appearance 4) Retaining walls exposed to public view and return walls are to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style 5) A detailed Planting and Imgation Plan, including slope planting, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 6) Wntten approval of Haven View Homeowners Association shall be submitted prior to the approval of construction drawings 7) Any change or modification to the extenor elevations or grading is subtect to review by the Design Review and Grading Rewew Committee 8) In addition to the Conceptual Landscape Plans being approved, landscape and irngation plans for slope planting shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to the approval of construction drawings ~. / • PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2004-00122 - ORTIZ October 27, 2004 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO 04-116 Engmeennp Division 1) Revise existing City Street Improvement Drawing No 1289, Sheets 1 and 15, as required by the City Engineer 2) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 3) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the right-of-way to the top of the curb along the street frontage 4) Prior to the issuance of budding permits, Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first budding permit application is submitted to the Budding and Safety Drnsion Single-family residential protects are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 J PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY, Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ 1~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00122 SUBJECT: SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE APPLICANT: ANDREWS & CHAPMAN ARCHITECTS LOCATION: 10973 STALLION WAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comole6on Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such parlicipahon shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 04-116, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the constructionlgrading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code . regulations, and Hillside Development Code Requirements 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner C ~~ Protect No DRC2004-00122 Completion Date D. E. F 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _I_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, _/_I_ including proper illumination 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the pro/ect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad/Dining • property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 11 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _//_ 12 Slope fencing along side property lines maybe wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ pro/ections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street _/_/ Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior . final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision is Pro~ecf No DRC2004-00122 Comoleoon Date 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigatfon system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For sfngle-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requred per the Development Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division G. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, ~-l3 / / / / I / I / I / / I -/_/ / I / / Protect No DRC2004-00122 Comoleaon Date K. f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Pro/ect Number (DRC2004-00122) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _I_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls - _/_/_ Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the pro/ect file number (DRC2004-00122) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro/ect or ma/or addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Offiaal after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordatwn and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_I_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separations _I_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check Protect No DRC2004-00122 Completion Date 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Ctty Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Itghts, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Stallion Way X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Remove drive approach and replace curb and gutter 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new constructiDn or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer ~~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- Protect Na DRC2004-00122 Existing City roads requmng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of~the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Size l]ty Stallion Way Liquidambar styraciflua American Sweet Gum 8 ft 25 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only M. Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices O. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner Comolehon Date _/_~~ / / / / / / / I r1 L_J / / / / / / _/_/~ ~%/ Project No DRC2004-00122 Comole6on Date • P. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibddy APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- ~' / RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS February 25, 2004 Fecteau Residence 10973 Stallion Way DRC2004-00122 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The regwred fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per squaze inch This requirement ~s made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances On all site plans to be • submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wr[hm 600-feet of the proposed project site Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant ~s responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submmmg the letter to Fire Construction Sernces 2. Address: Note on the plans that pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with mm~mum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be mtemally or externally ~llummated dunng penods of dazkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry /8 Staff Report DATE: October 27, 2004 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00143 -ANDREWS 8 CHAPMAN - A request to construct a two story, single-family residence on 69 acre in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Reales Street, west of BerylStreet-APN 1061-801-15 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION ANALYSIS A General The property is asingle-family lot located within Tract 11626 on the south side of Reales Street dust west of Beryl Street Because the property is located within the hillside area, the design is subtect to the Hillside Development Regulations The lot slopes to the south at approximately 20 percent, with the most significant slope at the rear of the property The house is located within the 30-foot building envelope as required by the City's Hillside Development Standards and within the maximum lot coverage regwrements of the Very Low Residential Distract The applicant has proposed afour-car, detached garage at the front of the property This garage will utilize a cut of 8 feet into the natural terrain and hence, regwres Planning Commission approval The entry of the garage faces towards the east away from the streeUpublic wew and is also enhanced by a large bay window at the front elevation The applicant has met with staff regarding the placement of the garage and ways to reduce the cut of the natural terrain If the garage were raised to accommodate the maximum of 4-feet 11-inches of cut regwred by the Hillside Ordinance, the slope of the driveway would exceed the maximum and would regwre additional retaining walls creating a need for a vanance for wall heights on the west elevation B Grading Review Committee On September 14, 2004, the Committee reviewed the protect The Committee recommended approval of the project subtect to staff recommendations The applicant has met numerous times with staff to incorporate hillside regulations into the site design of the home such as, stepped planter areas on the east and south, terraced walls to reduce maximum wall heights to 6 feet, and stepped floor systems The applicant has also ITEM "F" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00143 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN October 27, 2004 Page 2 revised the horse corral to be rectangular in shape (24 feet by 48 feet) to provide a larger setback from the proposed single family home C Environmental Assessment This pro)ect is environmentally exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA -Section No 15300) review RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2004-00143 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectful ubmitted Brad u City Planner BB EW\ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan and Elevations • ' Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2004-00143 ~-a emm n.u AgAP~ y r m >.. on {.o! b~t e~ 0 a 6~ Q 0 '~ h a~~ \ ~~~ i ~b 1-~( e p Slle Plan q~, i ^\` ~ C`i~ \~ °~_~ .~ ( 1 \ I 1Q~ i ~ „~- . . . ' {~ 8.Q I ~ f 11;1 `b t r ~ \II J \ t~~~p \ I1 r (r 11 'n 1~ 11 39 ~ 1 It 11 / \\ ,I 11 d Q 1 G ~ ~ { 1 1 11 \ 1 p 1 1 9\~~ \1 PN'0~ t P11 4y ~ I 9} 1 ~11 1 1 / t 1~, 1 1 1 t ( 1 1 ~~~~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ye# 1 \ 11 0~'~ 114 ~'^ 1~ ,lam 11 / 1 1 11 \~ _awaF~ ,, C-I Sde Plan Sheet Intlex Pro)ecl Infwmalion A-0 Garage Plan A-I Pnsl Plow Plon A-2 5<contl Floor Plan A-3 Exterior ElevatlOa9 q-4 Evlenw ElevoLOns --Survey 1 Conceptual Grodmq Plon k Sections Sheet Index (-- l Pro.rl DescnGhan. Proposed 5595 s9 II Two-glory Single-lamely Residence p~yecl Atltlrese. lot 22 Raales S! Rancho Cucamonga Ca 9031 San Bernortlmo County L°t~. 29 200 sq rl Prooeeetl F rsl FlGer 3301 s f (axdudmg garage and entry porch meoeuree to outside wall) Proeoe d caveree GPrch 149 s 1 p Does d Secontl Flao. 2439 sf (exdudnq evtenor decks measured to outside wall) S sand Ilow deck=_ 681 s i p „..d Oelached farm ]60 s 1 (mmsured 1a oNSde wall) a~ 1JR (In<luemg covered palm one eaves overhang) ~, m61-fim-u e al Descr of an. Tract 11626 Lol 22 Th mas c~ee Poae. 5]3-CI xa. Pra7ecl InfromaUon xarE ~ ~ ~ ew~.' a, a f Ya.rG "a"r' ~~ Y.94 e _ x~.G ] 9 r~enp ` ybtla ,~j [ ~V iw MN~ei F i~ pe... ~--~ a .r.iw F-~ -,~_ e ~ p (~Q_ (/n ~ 1 e e t ~N e _ o~uvro eyw ry PIANMMO CAEE~ oxmamsn colwt ewru~o onrz O)q -inrrn ~a io10s s..mcsr`u .°so~i " )).w.vs wrcNrta jiil sro-e~ex nx - wv a me..,~.. s..~.. aropa..e sl. Plea 9i..1 lee. NcNlly Yap N C-1 J T T 2 439 SF PIANNINOCbE~ ONC]OMd01p NM yn.f A-2 J SECOND FLOOR PLAN .u„~,o~. owe~ewsmn - +~ Rge~N fill flw Hm fNN ~~~ A-1 J so °:° iy ~1 ~uiiu w ~, . 3~ ~~ z ~ ~~ ~ r e ~ : ^~qpF ~5g ~~q s ~ S ~ '~ ~~I sa i '¢ n' S [S ~~ ~ ~e ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~0 j6 SA ~6 ~ 3 jEFRR ~ i ~1~ o .. jt € 8g ~ : ~~, ~e^~,t~ ~rn nfl fl fl fn f_l f•InOO~ g~ 111111 I~I~~1~~ §~~ ~ e (S( ~ iitiii III ' 7 e ~ sp ~ Y SF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ I I I ii11~1 ~ ~ I 'a pe e ~ '~' ~q~ 9 ~' ~g~ a °$ ° ~ yep ~" "'@ ~g ~ F ~ i I '~ e ~ E 5 k a n~ n ~n n3 Q ~ ?~ y' a $s r ~ n~d c~ ,: n¢ ~ 5 i I !III E ~~ ~ooooo0000000000000o g~ iiiiii ill!!1!~ g11 ~ s ;: ~-m ~ N ill Fl"a ~ 7 '~_ 6= r E 1 +r ~g g~: I I I~ III I I I I ® I II 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ~~ I I I 1 I I I I I I I I ~ j I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~ I I I I ®I 1 I O r a J W V I 1 I 1 1 ~ I 11 c I 1 1 I rtt 1 I I I I P g 1 I 1~ BI u II 11 4~~ 8~ I 1 $y~ 55 I I ~ dl ~ 1 I ~~~ I l~g~ I ~- I ~ p-rr I I `(a(p~p I I I ~&5~ II i:7~ I I ~-- I I I I E I II ~p ~S §I i I € 6 [I I ~~ s !I ~ . \~ I ~ ~ ~ e ~ e II Q-~' ~\ { ~ ~~ ~ ~'? I ~ $ ~ I \ ~ I I 1 \~ I ~J_ ~ I 'I ~ ~^^ ~ ~ ~ °C_ I 1 ^^ 1 ~ I ^^ 1 I I I I I I o- ^^ 1 o- 1 1 ~ ^° I _ ^ ^ s I A 1 II ^^^ ~ ~ o- s o- II $ Il pl `' `~ ~'/ 1 E 6 I SeS I I 5 I I F!I I I 1 I 1 1 J I I I I ~ I I 11 I II 1 I I I 1 I I I I I II YY E e P I EI I I~i I I I 1 I J I ~ 3~. I I ! ' I I I I !~~ 9Pe ~9ae9 ~E` I ~ I ®9~ ~ ' tv t~ 1 ~ 1 I •o• GARAGE-NORTH ELEVATION 60 ~i~r°` -in„ .~. -1_. GARAGE PLAN 780 SF RIANNdG CAlE. oacmwaetu - '° _ ,~, ~'T-eA RWwM Gauge Rm GARAGE-WEST ELEVATION vwow~a Nun ~m~+ A-0 J "!y' GARAGE-EAST ELEVATION GARAGE-SOUTH ELEVATION • RESOLUTION NO 04-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00143, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCTA 5,595 SQUARE N TOHESVERY LOW RESHDENTIOAL DISTRICT (O1U2 DWELLOING UNITS PER ACRE), IDENTIFIED AS LOT 22 OF TRACT 11626, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1061-801-15 A Recitals 1 Andrews & Chapman filed an application for the approval of Development Rewew DRC2004-00143 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of October 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on October 27, 2004, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within Tract 116256 on the south side of Reales Street, west of Beryl Street, with a street frontage of approximately 84 5 feet and lot depth of approximately 276 5 feet, and b The properties to the east and west have been developed v~nth single-family homes The property to the north is vacant, to the south is Reales Street, and c The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs, and d The proposed development is consistent with single-family development in the area (Tract 11626), and e The applicant is proposing to cut 1,150 cubic yards and fill 210 cubic yards cubic yards of soil from the site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-117 DRC2004-00143 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN October 27, 2004 Page 2 The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wtl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 The Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgatedtthereunderllfPursuant to Section) 9303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, an'd n~ he StandardrC ndt ornseattached Iherteto andtmcorpo at d herein byh sltreferetnceh below Plamm~a Deaartment 1) Approval is fora 5,595 square foot home located on Lot 22 of Tract 11626 on Reales Street 2) In addition to the vegetation regwred by the Hillside Ordinance, extensive ground cover plantings wtl be required to provide erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3) Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a natural appearance 4) Select plant matenals for their swtability to the environment and compatibility with Xenscape pnnciples 5) be decors vellmasonry and tcompatliblelwrth thetarchitectu aalstylee to 6) prepared bylaatiln ensed (landscape arch test and subm fled fo~allCb~ Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits Engineenna Division 1) Revise existing Gty Street Improvement Mylars, Drawing 847, Sheets 1, 5, and 6 2) Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the nght-of-way to the top of the curb along the street frontagGe ~/D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 04-117 • DRC2004-00143 -ANDREWS AND CHAPMAN October 27, 2004 Page 3 3) Slope of the driveway shall not exceed the 20 percent maximum allowable by the City's Hillside Development Code 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chamnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary . I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 27th day of October 2004, by the following vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~~ / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00143 SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY CUSTOM HOME APPLICANT: GEOFF CHAPMAN LOCATION: LOT 22, TRACT MAP 11626 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sale discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapaGon shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Hillside Regulations SC-1-04 ~ Completion Dale / / / / / / / / ~~a Pro7ecl No DRC2004-00143 Completion Date D. E. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions -/_/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and plans shall be ancy ccu t -/-/- , p o o State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be -/-/- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, tenc -/-I- y consis building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, orapproved use has commenced, whichever comes first , 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ble Community or Specific Plans in effect at the l d -I-I- ica app other applicable City Ordinances, an time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with -/-/- all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ned through the use of a combination of concrete t l -/-/- y scree e located out of public view and adequa or masonry walls, berming, andlor landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, -/-/~ including proper illumination 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall ith effort to work with the adtoining d f -I-/- a condition would result, the developer shall make a goo erty owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ro ' p p s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect perimeter 11 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry -/-/- 12 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant I-I - - 13 Slope Penang along side property lines maybe wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to -/-/- maintain an open feeling and enhance views Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or d the sound buffered from adtacent properties and -/-/_ protections, shall be shielded from view an streets as requued by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street _/= ~ SC-1-04 ~-13 Protect No DRC2004-00143 Comolehon Date F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in repared by a licensed landscape architect and shall be t l p opmen , the case of residential deve bmitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior su final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ion f or eros slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover ll include a permanent irrigation system to be h t a ion s control Slope planting required by this sec installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater nce as slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erasion control and to soften their appeara llon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size 15 -ga follows one shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks s of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or in exces larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in e planttng required by this section shall lane Slo l p ope p staggered clusters to soften and vary s ermanent trrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy de a l p inc u 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and urigation shall be continuously the developer until each individual unit is sold ondition b th y riving c maintained in a healthy and and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 n t thelrequired streetrtrees andesitope planlting ent dd h l n y o n a e Th s requ cement shall b Code k l 8 w and approval and reevae e tao City P anne slub l b h r e P e t lg a h t a e d s p ans a ape ands ed e requ h coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engmeenng Droision 7 nmeterlofthrsdpro ect area shallsbe continuously maantaineld byt he devleloper of-way on the 8 pe All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Diwsion G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, SC-1-04 3 1 ~I~ -/-/- / / / / I / / I /_/_ / I / I -/-/- / / Protect No DRC2004-00143 ComDleUOn Date b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f diagramgsewereor sepltic system Ilocahon,efxture unt srgas p p'mgaand heating and ae conditioning, and g Planning Divtsion Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00143) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect'slEngineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requred prior to plan check submittal Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance Separate permits are required for Penang and/or walls Site Development 1 mlarkedhwith the pro ectf leonumber (eek DRC OOr1 00001) rThe applicanlt shalAllcomplyw th the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations m effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availabilityof the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautifcation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Chec li ant shalom rtov de a copy of hellschool fees receip9lo he Budding and Safety D v sionl Fees App P prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Offiaal after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fue-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions / I / I I / I I i / / / / / I / I K. Grading 1 Standards t anduaccetpted grtadingllprecticesor The finah graldrngl p anll shalCbeenCsubstant al / conformance with the approved grading plan SC-1-04 4 t~~/~ Protect No DRC2004-00143 Comolehon Date 2 A Bolls report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to ~~ Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Reales Street X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) if so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) curbside drains (fl remove existing dnve approach Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro)ect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer SC-1-04 / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / I / / / / / / / ~-l~ Proled No DRC2004-00143 Comolehon Date Notes . 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwl shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _I_I_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h e Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 5 legtenld t(boxtrbe ow)r and sconsttructionsnotes (shall appears ona heats lell page of he stree / / improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construc~iln legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typ y sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans . The City Engineer reserves the right to ad/ust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze ~ Reales Street Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Tree 5' 35' O C 15 Gal Pd~ ~n Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) hre City inspectors Any unus as toxpi a es or nutr ent deficienc es mays equbre baclkfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas N. Utilities /_/_ 1 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2 Cucamonga CountylWater Dis bct (CCWD), Radncho Ctucamonga Fee Protec6onlDi tact and the / he CCW Dnsarequaled pnorato fnal map approval orsssuan a odf perm setwh chever olccus first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval SC-1-04 C6 r ~I Probed No DRC2004-00143 Comole6on Date C~ in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects O. General Requirements and Approvals Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Division when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices Q. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner R. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 7 F-/ I I / / I / / / / / RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS October 20, 2004 Lot 22 Residence NW side ofReales DRC2004-00143 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. Grading and Bwldmg permit will not be issued until fuel modification plans are received, reviewed and approved by FCS The Ftre Flow confirmation must also be received for Butldmg permit issuance. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelmes for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a For single-family residential projects m the designated Hazazdous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants aze to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants aze 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential project from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route azound the extenor of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances For structures m excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project maybe used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 Fire service plans are regwred for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show al] fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site r /~ FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to subm~ttmg plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specrfications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply p~pmg system must be obtained pnor to subm~ttrng the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire D~stnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 Cahfornra Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed m 1 Buildings constructed m the designed Hazardous Fire Areas whrch include a All structures that do not meet Fire D~stnct access regwrements (see Frre Access) b When requrred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This project rs located wrthm the "State Responsrb~lrty Area" (SRA), the "Very Hrgh Fire Hazard Seventy Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside Drstnct", and/or wtthrn the azea rdentified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exh~brt V-7 as H~QIr Probability-H~gh Consequence for Frre Risk These locations have been determined to be w~thrn the "Hazardous Frre Area" as defined by the Fire Drstnct. The Hazazdous Frre Area ~s based on maps produced by the Cahfornra Department of Forestry and Fue Protection and the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Hazard Reduction Plans The applicant shall prepaze the azch~tectural plans for the construction of the bwldmgs m accordance with the County of San Bemazdino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix lI-A Fire Area FR-1 or FR-2 requirements apply to the construction of the buildings based on the slope of the terrain and/or m~tigat~on of the fuel modrficatron plans The development code provides standards regulating and requrnng a. Fire resrstrve roof assemblies b Fuel Modrfication and hazard reduction plans c. Fire Drstnct access roadways d. Fire resrstive construction and protection of openings e. Fire spnnkler systems f Fue flow cntena For construction requirements m the "Hazazd Frre Area" refer to the following web srte h //www co san-bemardmo ca us/]andusesernces/DevCode (Chapter 2 Hazard Protection, Article 2 Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy Also reference RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A 2. Construction requirements for the Hazardous Fire Area (Thrs rs not a complete ]rst of requirements and some requirements may not apply to FR-2 Areas) a The roof shall be a Class "A" fire-resistive assembly approved by Building and Safety Fire- retazdant Class "A" wood shakes and shrngles shall be listed to comply with the 10-year "natural" weathenng test Class "A" roof assemblies shall be installed m accordance wtth them listrng and manufacturer's instructions b The space between rafters at the extenor walls shall be solydly filled wrth trght-fittrng wood blocks ]-1/2 rnches thick The eaves may also be "boxed" c The exposed surface of extenor wall must be a part of a listed one-hour fire resrstive assembly d All extenor doors must be of a solid wood core type Dual pane glass is requrred for all glass in doors e All wrndows and sliding glass doors shall be constructed of dual-pane glass 2~-a0 f Cantilevered or standard type decks shall be constructed m accordance with one of the following• 1 A minimum of 1-1/2 rnch lumber for all the framing and any deck matenals 2 Protection must be provided on the underside of the deck by matenals approved for one (1) hour fire-res~strve construction 3 Be ofnon-combustible matenals, as defined m the Building Code g Patio covers attached or within 10-feet of a residential structure shall not be constructed of matenals less than 1/2-inch m thickness Plastic, bamboo, straw, fiberglass or wood-lattrce less than 1/2-inch m thickness aze not permitted h All required fences adjacent to fuel modification areas or wildland areas built as cond~ttons of approval shall be ofnon-combustible matenals as defined m the Building Code. Any fence wrthm 10-feet of the fuel modrfication area or wildland azea shall be non-combustible, Beyond 10-feet, the fence maybe constructed of any approved matenal All other fences, rncludmg those on the rntenor of the project are not subject to this requrrement r Roadways shall be provrded along the project penmeter exposed to a fire hazard or fuel modrfied area The roadway rs to allow fire drstnct vehicle access Such roadways shall be a minimum twenty (20) feet m width, wrth a grade not to exceed fourteen percent (14%) and capable of supporting fire fighting vehicles 3 Fuel ModiScation Requirements The apphcant shall prepare fuel modrficatron plans for the srte rn accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Department's Fuel Modrficatron Plan Gurdelrnes and RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A For the fuel medication plan requrrements, refer to the following web site http //www lacofd ore/forestry%SFfolder/ydf/frnvQ ndf A The preliminary fuel medication plans shall: 1 Show al] property fines, contour tines and locations of proposed buildings or structures 2 Show the 100-foot defensrble space for slopes less than 15%, for se d x IIlA) around the defensrble space may be regwred (Per RCFPD Ordinance 39, App stnrcture 3 Show each fuel modification zone (setback, ~mgation method, thrnnrng and interface thrnnmg) 4 Show existing vegetation impacted by the regwred fuel modrfication and proposed vegetation to be planted m the fuel modification area, rf any The prehmmary plans should be sensrtive to raze, threatened or endangered specres and the apphcant must be prepared to address their disposition m the final plans 5 Include photographs of the azea that show the type of vegetation currently existing, rncludmg the height, density and relationship to grade 6 Descnbe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply wrth the fuel modification plans 7 Descnbe on the plans the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, pazks and/or green space 600-feet beyond the site or development property lrne rn all drrectrons State on the plans who will have ultimate responsrbrhty for maintenance of the fuel modification zones The apphcant shall obtain Frre Drstnct approval of a final fuel mod~ficat~on/hazazd reduction plan and program The plan shall mdreate the proposed means of achrevmg an acceptable level of nsk to the structures B The final fuel modification plans shall: 1 Clearly md~cate each fuel modification zone (setback, rmgation method, thrnnmg and interface thrnnmg) Also md~cate locations of permanent zone identification markers • 2 Include ~mgation plans and spec~ficahons 3 Include the landscape plan The landscape plan must ~dentrfy the locatron and type of supplemental plantings The plans and specifications shall include both the common and botanical names of new and ex~stmg plants wrthm the fuel modification area Clearly 3 /~~O't, indicate on the plans the disposition of impacted existing vegetation and identifying those • proposed for retention Al] groundcover, shrub, plants and trees are required to be fire- resistive maccordance with three (3) published references for fire safe vegetation Refer to the following web site http://www.ucfpl.cuop.edu/FMI-Zone.XIV paves 168 to 177.btm 4 Indicate any special or specific landscape maintenance intended for the site such as pruning, "hmbmg up", mowing, etc 5 Descnbe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply, with the fuel modification plans azks and/or een s ace 600- 6 Descnbe the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, p ~ P feet beyond the site or development property line in all directions. 7 Note the names, addresses and phone numbers of the responsible parties for the maintenance of the fuel modification zones 8 Include on the tale sheet the conditions of approval, CC&R's and/or any deed instructions related to the site or final fuel modification area Include a copy of the approved preliminary fuel modification plans with this submittal. 9 Provide a copy of the proposed fuel modification maintenance documents to be recorded The maintenance agreements must be perpetual m the event of property transfer and/or a change m Boazd of Directors for the Homeowner's Association 10 Indicate that the developer will implement the required measures of the approved fuel modification/hazazd reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District, before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project Fire Construction Sernces must be summoned for an on-site inspection and approval pnor to the issuance of the building permit 4 In-fill single-family dwelling projects located in the Hazardous Fire Area A simplified landscaping/fuel modification plan maybe acceptable. The plan shall detail the defensible space Provide a minimum 100-feet defensible space for slopes less than 15% and a lazger defensible space may be required for slopes of 15% or more The proposed and/or existing vegetation must be shown FR-1 construction requirements must be met The azchrtect must implement FR-1 Area construction requirements into the design of the home 5 of bieeused without theFire Safey Divsion's wntteniapproval Specfic fireoprotaction measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to a A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle b Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks c Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day d For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the azea around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-Feet A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services pnor to cutting, welding or gnndmg work e Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced m wildfire hazard mitigation planning Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel 4 ~,a ~, modification/hazazd reduction plan determined to be necessazy by the Fire Distnct before the introduction of any combustible matenals into the project area Approval is subject to an on-site inspection Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification hazard reduction plan requirements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire Distnct staff Schedule the mspecrion with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application , Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marsha] will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" fonn along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standazds Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standazds # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fue Construction Sernces will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Al] required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Fuel Modification Plans Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazazdous Area requirements 4 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with al] the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 5 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining [he fire flow mfoimation from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 6 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" 5 ~'L~ s s PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 2. 4 6 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ Engineenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers On pnvate property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnnkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Sernces, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perfonn the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services venfying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow m accordance with the Cahfomia Fire Code Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry Fuel ModiTication Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred m the standazd The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fue Inspector 6~-a~ ~ ~ 7~° Y Planning Commission Meetmg of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM n~v 9 zo S- S~'t ~p2a ~ ~~7 ~~~ i ~+ ~°b13. _ ~.Co-~ 5o~n-~ 4~a S. S~ G~~~o~--2~ ~-• C,~ -~o~r3